Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
09272022 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn INVOCATION: Chaplain Themba M. Mzizi of Riverside County Sheriffs Department FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS - NONE BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on Page 1 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of September 13, 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of September 13, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands Page 2 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 4. Adopt Ordinance 2022-11 Approving the Planned Development Overlay Amendment (PA20-1324) (Second Reading) 5. 6. Recommendation Attachments That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.2022-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324) Agenda Report Ordinance Exhibit A Approve a Three-year Microsoft Enterprise Renewal Agreement with CDW-G for Microsoft Software Licenses Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve a three-year Microsoft Enterprise Renewal Agreement with CDW-G, in the annual amount of $231,100.44, for a total contract amount of $693,301.32 subject to the annual True -up costs as described in recommendation 2; and 2. Approve 20% of the total contract, in the amount of $138,660.26, for the annual True -up cost for the term of the three-year agreement. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Approve the Seventh Amendment to the Franchise Agreement with CR & R Incorporated Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH CR & R, INC., FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS Page 3 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 7. 8. AND FOR TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Seventh Amendment Award a Construction Contract to Act 1 Construction, Inc. for Community Recreation Center Renovations - Phase 1, PW19-07 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to Act 1 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $3,568,395, for Community Recreation Center Renovations - Phase 1, PW19-07; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve construction contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, $356,839.50; and 3. Make a finding that Community Recreation Center Renovations - Phase 1, PW 19-07 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. Attachments: Agenda Report Contract Project Description Project Location Map Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractors Affidavit and Final Release Page 4 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 5 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 9. Approve Action Minutes of September 13, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of September 13, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 6 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, October 11, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 7 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart TPFA PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. TPFA PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Board of Directors before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Board. The Chair may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Chair may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 10. Approve Resolutions Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Page 8 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 Recommendation: 1. That the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Board") hold a public hearing relating to the proposed annexation of territory to Zone 1 of the Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2), and adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO ZONE 1OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTOR 2. That the Board hold an election regarding the annexation, and adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution - Annexation Resolution - Election Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien Second Amendment to Acquisition Agreement TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS TPFA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will be held on Tuesday, October 11, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 9 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 11. Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibili . Act (TEFRA) Hearing, Adopt a Resolution Approving the Issuance of Not to Exceed $25,000,000 of California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Vine Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Project Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the issuance by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") of not to exceed $25,000,000 of the Authority's Revenue Obligations (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership (the "Borrower"); and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of educational facilities for the benefit of the Borrower. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA Page 10 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $25,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING OF MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING FOR THE BENEFIT OF VINE CREEK APARTMENTS AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED Attachments: Agenda Report RPcnlntinn Resolution No. 19-45 Notice of Public Hearing RIT..g1NF.CC Any member of the public may address the City Council on items that appear on the Business portion of the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 12. Introduce Ordinance Adopting 2022 California Fire Code Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BASED ON THE 2019 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, IN ITS ENTIRETY, REGULATING AND GOVERNING THE SAFEGUARD OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS ARISING FROM THE STORAGE, HANDLING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, MATERIALS AND DEVICES, AND FROM CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE OR PROPERTY IN THE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS AND PREMISES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, INCLUDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND THE COLLECTION OF FEES Page 11 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 Attachments: Agenda Report (lydinnncP 13. Introduce Ordinance Adopting 2022 California Building Code Recommendation: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; AND CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (RECEIVE AND FILE) 14. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Planning Activity Report 15. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Fire Department Report 16. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report Page 12 City Council Agenda September 27, 2022 ITEMS FOR PLACEMENT CONSIDERATION ON FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes unless extended by a majority vote of the City Council. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. General discussion amongst the City Council on items listed under this section of the agenda shall be limited to 15 minutes. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. A. Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, October 11, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 13 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council convened in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to two matters of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Mayor Matt Rahn INVOCATION: Marti Treckman of Grace Presbyterian Church FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Proclamation for Fire Prevention Week Proclamation for National Preparedness Month Proclamation for National Hispanic Heritage Month BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Debbie Aiton • Tim Thompson • Maribel Sebastian • Rudy Gonzalez • Liana Weskamp • Janette Chun The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment: 0 Payam Daneshvar PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Alex Madrid (Item #17) The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment: • Jason Cohen, Esq. (Item # 17) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2. Approve Action Minutes of August 23, 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of August 23, 2022. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-69 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. Accent the Notice of Draft Amendments for the 2022 Conflict of Interest Code Recommendation: That the City Council accept the notice of draft amendments to the Conflict of Interest Code for the 2022 calendar year pursuant to Government Code 87306.5 and direct the City Clerk to publish the Notice of Intent. 5. Approve Service Agreement with the County of Riverside for Murrieta Hot Springs Road Slurry Seal Improvements Recommendation: That the City Council approve a service agreement with the County of Riverside for Murrieta Hot Springs Road Slurry Seal Improvements and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. 6. Approve Cooperative Agreement Between Riverside County Transportation Commission and City of Temecula Regarding French Valley Parkway Project Incorporation of I-15 Smart Freeway Project Elements Recommendation: That the City Council approve a cooperative agreement between the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and City of Temecula regarding incorporation of I-15 Smart Freeway Project elements into the City's I-15/French Valley Parkway, Phase II Project; and funding for the projects. 7. Approve First Amendment to the Agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., for Fencing Maintenance Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the first amendment to the minor maintenance agreement with Moore Fence Company, Inc., in the amount of $320,000, and extend the term through June 30, 2025, for a total agreement amount of $500,000. 8. Award Construction Contract to LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - Fiscal Year 2021-22. PW22-01 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award construction contract to LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. in the amount of $272,369.97 for the Citywide Concrete Repairs - Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve construction contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $27,237, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; and 3. Make a finding that the Citywide Concrete Repairs - Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 9. Award Construction Contract to International Line Builders, Inc. for the Traffic Promenade Mall Ring Road, PW21-15 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award construction contract to International Line Builders, Inc. in the amount of $412,206, for the Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road, PW21-15; and 2. Approve construction contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $41,220.60, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; and 3. Make a finding that the Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road, PW21-15 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. 10. Increase the Design -Build Contingency Authorization for the Margarita Recreation Center, Project No. PW17-21 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve an increase to the contingency for design -build of the Margarita Recreation Center Project, PW17-21 by $895,000; and 2. Increase the City Manager Authority to approve change orders to the design -build contract by $895,000. 11. Increase the Professional Services Contingency Authorization for the Margarita Recreation Center, Project No. PW17-21 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve an increase to the contingency for professional services for the Margarita Recreation Center Project, PW 17-21 by $80,000; and 2. Increase the City Manager Authority to approve change orders to the project services contract by $80,000. 12. Reject All Bids for Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13, and Authorize the Proiect to be Rebid Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Reject all Construction Bids for Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13; and 2. Authorize the Department of Public Works to re -advertise Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 for Construction Bids. RECESS: At 6:59 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Temecula Public Financing Authority Meeting. At 7:04 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 15. Approve Fiscal Year 2021-22 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Rebort (CAPER) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2021-22 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) WITH THE ADDITION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE REPORT TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 16. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Substantial Amendment to the 2020-21 CDBG Annual Action Plan Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO THE 2020-21 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ANNUAL ACTION PLAN Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 17. Consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) (Continued from August 23, 2022) Recommendation: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve the project including a General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) and adopt related resolutions and introduce ordinance: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 5 TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323) ORDINANCE NO. 2022-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326) Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 6 ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT The City Attorney stated there was no reportable actions from closed session. ADJOURNMENT At 7:46 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, September 27, 2022, at 4:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Memory of Ed Morel Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pam Espinoza, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 10,764,796.29. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 08/30/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 08/31/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/06/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/08/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/09/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 09/01/2022 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 9/27/2022 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 573,246.67 8,075,682.17 85,984.60 1,312,421.18 11,748.90 705,712.77 $ 10,764,796.29 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 8,837,341.92 110 COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT 375.25 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 1,456.18 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 28,116.35 165 RDA DEV- LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 3,879.30 170 MEASURE A FUND 84,880.00 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 243,174.48 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 23,414.00 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,047.01 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 9,811.19 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 7,274.48 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 574,728.08 300 INSURANCE FUND 4,678.47 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 5,420.24 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 55,339.86 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 10,316.88 340 FACILITIES 25,860.68 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 9,144.79 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 11,276.15 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 32,647.40 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,377.55 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 19,572.30 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 33,083.00 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 764.09 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 581.04 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 69.52 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,120.77 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 458.87 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 471.31 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 3,523.83 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 94.78 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 316.02 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE I MEADOWVIEW 99.64 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 2,274.49 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 553.75 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 141.29 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 311.64 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 61.59 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 1,819.96 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 372.86 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 6,466.72 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 94.00 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 172.07 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 960.35 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 76.24 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 602.64 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 93.49 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 12,367.00 $ 10,059,083.52 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 363,754.04 110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 918.40 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 642.88 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,166.14 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 200,469.67 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,491.24 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 201.67 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,990.19 300 INSURANCE FUND 3,147.98 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 3,148.07 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 40,391.81 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 4,440.22 340 FACILITIES 8,526.85 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 70,423.61 705,712.77 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 10,764,796.29 apChkLst 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 14005 8/19/2022 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VAR JUL WATER 3003793 28250 YNEZ 24,324.89 24,324.89 DISTRICT RD LAKE 14041 7/21/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 400.90 400.90 RETIREMENT) 14042 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 51.31 51.31 DIST LOOP RD 14043 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 39656 DIEGO DR 141.29 141.29 DIST 14044 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 31991 RORIPAUGH 146.73 146.73 DIST VALLEY 14045 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 32101 SOMMERS 161.08 161.08 DIST BEND 14046 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 2O1.60 201.60 DIST LOOP RD 14047 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH 269.32 269.32 DIST LOOP RD 14048 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 31991 RORIPAUGH 2,601.06 2,601.06 DIST RD 14049 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 0 SOMMERS BEND 10,197.21 10,197.21 DIST 14050 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT 70.74 70.74 DIST SPRINGS RD 14051 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT 458.21 458.21 DIST SPRINGS RD 14052 8/18/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JULY WATER SVCS 39569 SERAPHINA 602.64 602.64 DIST RD 14053 8/18/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC AUG INTERNET SVCS: LIBRARY 5.31 5.31 14054 8/18/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC AUG INTERNET SVCS: LIBRARY 5.31 5.31 14055 8/18/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 30875 600.91 600.91 RANCHO VISTA Page:1 apChkLst 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 14056 8/19/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 32131 S 282.73 282.73 LOOP RD 14057 8/19/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN 298.38 298.38 ST 14058 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700618534991 30395 MURRIETA 40.12 40.12 HOT 14059 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700030933344 26706 YNEZ RD 79.10 79.10 14060 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700145715868 30499 RANCHO 90.81 90.81 14061 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700246573943 26953 YNEZ RD 170.21 170.21 14062 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700367835663 28582 HARVESTON 1,071.45 1,071.45 DR 14063 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700036969370 40820 1,239.58 1,239.58 WINCHESTER RD 14064 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700408183926 40233 VILLAGE RD 3,740.17 3,740.17 14065 8/22/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 600001004059 28000 LA SERENA 6,900.89 6,900.89 WAY 14066 8/23/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC AUG INTERNET SVCS: CHILDREN'S 130.98 130.98 MUSEUM 14067 8/24/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC AUG INTERNET SVCS: DMV LINE 100.98 100.98 14068 8/23/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUL 091-085-1632-0: 41951 MORAGA RD 96.98 96.98 14069 8/24/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUL 055-475-6169-5: 32380 DEER 14.30 14.30 HOLLOW 14071 8/23/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 30600 625.16 625.16 PAUBA RD 14072 8/23/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700246548782 26953 YNEZ RD 105.74 105.74 14073 8/23/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JULY 700475634086 26034 YNEZ RD 395.70 395.70 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 14074 8/24/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 14075 8/19/2022 005460 U S BANK 14076 8/19/2022 005460 US BANK 14077 8/25/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 14078 8/25/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE (Continued) Description Amount Paid JULY 700252118808 29721 RYECREST 18.54 SS3 & SP2 REMITTNACE: FINANCE 108,101.19 INVESTMENT PURCHASE: FINANCE 5,000,000.00 AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 28816 PUJOL 600.91 ST AUGUST INTERNET SVCS 42569 600.91 MARGARITA RD 14079 9/1/2022 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 169.27 SUPPORT 14081 9/1/2022 021301 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 384.62 106474 PAYMENT 14082 9/1/2022 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 18,328.44 303355 PAYMENT 209957 8/31/2022 010905 ALLIED TRAFFIC & LIGHT TOWER RENTAL: JULY 4: TCSD 800.00 EQUIPMENT, RENTALS INC 209958 8/31/2022 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC EQUIPMT: MEDIC: FIRE 512.57 INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CHIEF: FIRE 81.55 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIF 62.04 209959 8/31/2022 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE JUL ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS: 10,500.00 VALLEYS TEMECULA 209960 8/31/2022 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: 28.55 THEATER AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JR 28.55 JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: LIB 28.28 209961 8/31/2022 021689 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC SEIR: TEM VLY HOSPITAL: PA22-0105 55,628.88 INITIAL STUDY: RENDEZVOUS PHA, 2,758.75 209962 8/31/2022 022568 BIO CLEAN ENVIRONMENTAL, INLET FILTER & INSTALLATION: NPDES: 10,395.00 SERVICES INC PW 209963 8/31/2022 001323 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, 7/23-8/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: TES POOL 318.65 DBA READYREFRESH 7/23-8/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP 106.03 7/23-8/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: SKATE P 11.30 Check Total 18.54 108,101.19 5,000,000.00 600.91 600.91 IM-11VIN 384.62 18, 328.44 800.00 656.16 10, 500.00 85.38 58,387.63 10, 395.00 435.98 Page:3 apChkLst 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 209964 8/31/2022 011348 BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS 8/18-9/14 WTR FILTER: FIRE STA 73 300.00 300.00 LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER SOFT 209965 8/31/2022 020692 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL, DIRECT & OVERLAP DEBT STATEMENT 1,000.00 1,000.00 STATISTICS INC 6/30/22 209966 8/31/2022 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOC 489.38 DIST ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC 457.57 946.95 209967 8/31/2022 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 SPECIAL EVENT SUPPLIES: 211.66 211.66 PREVENTION: FIRE 209968 8/31/2022 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA491 MISC SUPPLIES: CONTRACT CLASSES: 130.57 130.57 TCSD 209969 8/31/2022 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,767.85 1,767.85 209970 8/31/2022 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE LLC, HEALTH FAIR VENDOR RFSHMNTS: 3,836.52 3,836.52 DBA CORNER BAKERY CAFE TCSD 209971 8/31/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPT 21.95 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: PARKS: PW 7.77 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: ECON DEV 6.62 36.34 209972 8/31/2022 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00 50.00 209973 8/31/2022 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & JUL-SEPT SALES TAX & RECOVERY 7,924.95 7,924.95 ASSOC SVCS 209974 8/31/2022 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: PW 372.13 MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: PW 49.62 421.75 209975 8/31/2022 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA NAME BADGES: ECO DEV 17.40 17.40 TEMECULA TROPHY & DES 209976 8/31/2022 015034 EMPLOYEE #00487 REIMB: EXCURSION: MPSC 319.00 319.00 209977 8/31/2022 017427 MATCHETT, VIVIAN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 327.60 327.60 209978 8/31/2022 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL PAYMENT 13,614.04 13,614.04 COMPANY 209979 8/31/2022 010167 ODYSSEY POWER UPS PREVENTATIVE MAIN: CITY HALL 2,900.00 CORPORATION UPS PREVENTATIVE MAIN: TPL 1,425.00 4,325.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209980 8/31/2022 010338 POOLAND ELECTRICAL, PRODUCTS INC 209981 8/31/2022 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND, RECORDER 209982 8/31/2022 010777 RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE OFFICE 209983 8/31/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 209984 8/31/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 209985 8/31/2022 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 209986 8/31/2022 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW 50.00 50.00 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS: PLANNING 50.00 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS: PLANNI 20.00 LEGAL DOCUMENTS/MAPS: PLANNI 10.00 80.00 Animal Shelter Debt service fees FY 93,860.00 93,860.00 07/01-07/27 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,386,451.81 2,386,451.81 FY21/22 RMS/CLETS SRVCS: POLICE 180,937.00 180,937.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: DARRELL 175.00 ISSA PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: LAND U 175.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: COUNC 175.00 525.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: VARIOUS 493.00 PARKS PEST CONTROL SVCS: TCC 123.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: TCC/PANTRI 123.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CIVIC CTR 120.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CIVIC CENTE 120.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: HARVESTON 95.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CRC 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: THEATER 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: PARKING GP 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: THEATER 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CRC 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: JRC 74.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: BIRDSALL PI 70.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: TVE2 56.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: FOC 52.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WOLF CREE 49.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WOLF CREE 49.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: MUSEUM 42.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: MUSEUM 42.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WEST WING 40.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CHILDRENS 36.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CHILDRENS 36.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WEDDING Cl 32.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WEDDING Cl 32.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: SENIOR CTF 29.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: SENIOR CEN 29.00 2,192.00 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 209987 8/31/2022 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 209988 8/31/2022 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 209989 8/31/2022 018688 SUPERIOR READY MX L.P. CONCRETE MATERIALS: STREET MAINT: PW CONCRETE MATERIALS: STREET M 209990 8/31/2022 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT 209991 8/31/2022 007709 TOYOTA OF TEMECULA VALLEY PRIUS REPAIRS: PLANNING 209992 8/31/2022 011618 TSI INCORPORATED SOUND METERS: CODE ENF 209993 8/31/2022 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC MUNIS MAINTENANCE: FINANCE 209994 8/31/2022 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO SPA JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: LLC STREET MAINT JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: STR JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: CIP: 209995 8/31/2022 014850 VALLEY PRINTING SERVICES, PRINTING SVCS: FLYERS: CITY MGR INC. 209996 8/31/2022 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: FOC Amount Paid Check Total 10,476.69 10,476.69 1,215.38 1,215.38 1,519.35 1,479.35 2,998.70 4,487.96 4,487.96 441.80 441.80 5,580.33 5,580.33 85,853.00 85,853.00 25.00 5.00 5.00 35.00 100.05 100.05 82.00 82.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 8,075,682.17 Page.-6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 08/31/2022 3:39:30PM CITY OF TEMECULA 81 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 8,075,682.17 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 08/30/2022 1:31:12PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 502985 9/1/2022 022546 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, ANTENNA SPEAKER MICS: RISK ENTERPRISES 502986 9/1/2022 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES SEP STAND BY FEE: POLICE AFN DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIF DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIF 502987 9/1/2022 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: MPSC: PW AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TCC: P AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: FOC: P AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW AUG DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC C 502988 9/1/2022 021400 AYERS ELECTRIC INC ELECTRICAL MAINT SVCS: RRSP: PARKS ELECTRICAL MAINT SVCS: HARVESTON ELECTRICAL WORK: TCC MAT'LS INSTALLATION: UTILITY UNDERC 502989 9/1/2022 022790 CLEARSTAR INC PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR 502990 9/1/2022 017542 COX, KRISTI LYN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 502991 9/1/2022 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC 502992 9/1/2022 001393 DATA TICKET INC, DBA REVENUE EXPERTS 502993 9/1/2022 020648 DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 INC, CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES 502994 9/1/2022 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 502995 9/1/2022 019720 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES INC PLUMBING REPAIR: FIRE STA 92 FLOOR SINK REPLACE: FOC: PW JUL CITATIONS PROCESSING: POLICE MAINT OF SECURITY SYSTEM: INFO TECH PORTABLE RESTROOMS: PW PARKS PORTABLE RESTROOMS: PW PARKS RESTROOM RENTAL: 4TH OF JULY: TCSI RESTROOM RENTAL: 4TH OF JULY: TCSI PORTABLE RESTROOMS: PW PARKS PORTABLE RESTROOMS: PW PARKS MAR WTR QUALITY MAINT: DUCK POND/HARVEST Amount Paid Check Total 2,426.37 1,420.55 157.91 62.01 35.89 28.28 28.28 29.09 213.97 213.97 200.00 200.00 1,500.00 550.00 139.55 106.69 1,146.60 277.19 2,467.32 947.12 1,412.80 110.88 165.88 1,464.20 15,916.15 110.88 110.88 7,213.00 2,426.37 1,640.47 549.48 2,450.00 246.24 1,146.60 2,744.51 947.12 1,412.80 17,878.87 7,213.00 Page:1 apChkLst 08/30/2022 1:31:12PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 502996 9/1/2022 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT 232.65 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PV1 521.07 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARKS: PW 1,701.30 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP 101.88 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 790.94 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: P 133.00 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 570.91 4,051.75 502997 9/1/2022 012217 DUDEK JUL URBAN FOREST MGMT PLAN & 5,530.00 INVENTORY JUL URBAN FOREST MGMT PLAN & INVE 165.00 5,695.00 502998 9/1/2022 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT JUL'22 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: WC 1,250.00 1,250.00 INC 502999 9/1/2022 015966 ERGO SOLUTION INC ERGONOMIC EVALUATION: STUART 500.00 500.00 KUHN 503000 9/1/2022 022726 FORENSIC NURSING OF Sexual assault exams: Tern Sheriff 800.00 800.00 SOCAL INC 503001 9/1/2022 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, PROMOTIONAL ITEMS: ECON DEV 383.51 383.51 CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS 503002 9/1/2022 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES: FIRE STA84 31.81 INC Misc office supplies: Finance— 36.41 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE 58.73 126.95 503003 9/1/2022 003792 GRAINGER SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: PARKS 63.55 MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 53.42 116.97 503004 9/1/2022 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, CDBG REIMB: TANIS 11,518.16 INLAND VALLEY INC CDBG REIMB: TERRELL 14,973.16 26,491.32 503005 9/1/2022 020628 HASA INC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI 1,205.16 POOLS POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI PO 526.56 1,731.72 503006 9/1/2022 000520 HDL COREN AND CONE JUL-SEP PROP TAX CONSULTING: 6,557.69 6,557.69 FINANCE 503007 9/1/2022 001135 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 100.00 GROUP INC, DBA: FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 1,448.00 MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 138.00 1,686.00 503008 9/1/2022 022033 IE GENERAL ENGINEERING CONSTN CONTRACT SVCS: RRSP: CIP 168,247.38 168,247.38 INC Paget apChkLst Final Check List 08/30/2022 1:31:12PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 503009 9/1/2022 005579 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES, INC 503010 9/1/2022 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC 503011 9/1/2022 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 503012 9/1/2022 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC 503013 9/1/2022 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 503014 9/1/2022 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 687.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 1,127.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 642.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 477.00 WEED ABATEMENT & TRASH REMOVAL SVCS 8,858.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 322.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 349.50 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 322.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 377.00 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 2,224.50 WEED ABATEMENT SVCS - CODE ENF 2,112.00 MISC POOL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 113.00 MAT'L TESTING SVCS: RRSP RENO 4,672.80 EMERGENCY RESP EQUIP: CRC: TCSD 318.91 JUL LABOR COMPLIANCE SVCS: 1,106.88 PW20-13 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC -132.38 CTR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 503.34 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATER 41.06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 460.08 503015 9/1/2022 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,841.00 DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 503016 9/1/2022 020946 MUSSON THEATRICAL INC Misc.Supplies: Theater 93.50 503017 9/1/2022 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC JUL LDSCP MAINT: MEDIANS 20,836.90 TURF REPLACEMENT PROJECT: DUCK POND 34,502.00 JUL LDSCP MAINT: 1-15/79 INTERCHANGE 6,977.00 503018 9/1/2022 014173 NPG INC DBA, GOLDSTAR ASPHALT REPAIRS: GEN 41,990.00 ASPHALT PRODUCTS KEARNY/MARGARITA ASPHALT REPAIRS: MEADOWVIEW 84,880.00 503019 9/1/2022 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT: TRAFFIC MAINT 1,827.76 INC VEHICLE MAINT: TRAFFIC MAINT: PW 1,724.00 VEHICLE MAINT: STREET MAINT: PW 701.32 MAINT SVS REC N ROLL: MINIVAN: TCSD 48.78 CITY VEHICLE MAINT: PREVENTION: FIRE 39.94 Page: 3 Check Total 17,498.00 113.00 4,672.80 318.91 1,106.88 872.10 1,841.00 93.50 62,315.90 126,870.00 4,341.80 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 08/30/2022 1:31:12PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 503020 9/1/2022 022537 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 503021 9/1/2022 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CENTER 310.38 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: TVE2 113.52 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: THEATER 343.07 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CENTER 286.88 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 201.50 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: THEATER 13.85 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CONF CTR: PW 76.30 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 1,055.97 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 236.00 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 20,291.37 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 23,688.88 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 59.00 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 528.00 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 396.50 JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 2,274.27 503022 9/1/2022 004274 SAFE AND SECURE SECURITY SAFE WITH DIGITIAL SAFE: 1,339.80 LOCKSMITH SRVC FINANC LOCKSMITH SVCS: PARKS: PW 55.46 503023 9/1/2022 020922 EMPLOYEE #00529 REIMB: PTSC COMMISSION: TRAFFIC 82.03 503024 9/1/2022 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC JAZZ @ THE MERC 8/18 685.00 503025 9/1/2022 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC RFRSHMNTS: HUMAN SVCS & MPSC 298.05 503026 9/1/2022 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CARPET/TILE CLEANING: THEATER 1,720.00 CLEANING 503027 9/1/2022 003840 STRONG'S PAINTING PAINT SEAT ARMRESTS: THEATER 4,320.00 503028 9/1/2022 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC DJ SVCS: ART OFF THE WALLS: TVM 700.00 DJ SVCS: SECOND SAT: TVM 275.00 503029 9/1/2022 017415 TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS: CRC 5,359.20 503030 9/1/2022 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L. DJ/MC SVCS: BOAT REGATTA: TCSD 525.00 503031 9/1/2022 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC PROJECT INSP & OVERSIGHT: 69.00 CONSULTING LLC, ANSER PW18-03 ADVISORY MNGMT LLC INSPECTION SVS: PW-LAND DEV/NPDE; 31,467.00 PROJECT INSP & OVERSIGHT: PW18-11 138.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 2,401.47 47,474.02 1,395.26 82.03 685.00 298.05 1.720.00 4,320.00 975.00 5,359.20 525.00 31,674.00 573,246.67 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 08/30/2022 1:31:12PM CITY OF TEMECULA 47 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 573,246.67 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 13896 8/29/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT RETIREMENT) 14006 8/26/2022 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER 3031158 NACKE DR DISTRICT 14070 8/24/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUL 015-575-0195-2: 32211 WOLF VALLEY RD 14080 9/1/2022 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 14083 9/1/2022 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAX PAYMENT 14084 9/1/2022 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 14085 9/1/2022 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT SOLUTION 14086 9/1/2022 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 14087 9/1/2022 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 14088 9/1/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT PREMIUM PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 209997 9/8/2022 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SEP EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM: LLC, DBA AETNA RESOURCES HR Amount Paid Check Total 139,511.82 139,511.82 31,290.22 31,290.22 206.25 206.25 23,504.18 23,504.18 39,809.73 39,809.73 118, 700.45 118, 700.45 14,937.21 14,937.21 427.79 427.79 5,064.18 5,064.18 158,533.75 0.00 158,533.75 1,535.60 1,535.60 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209998 9/8/2022 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 209999 9/8/2022 007065 B&H PHOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP 210000 9/8/2022 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC 210001 9/8/2022 022568 BIO CLEAN ENVIRONMENTAL, SERVICES INC ►�iGId�y�7E:if����i>i�E:TiK)♦ 1�):�C�P►[K�L�I7_1�1'1 (Continued) Description BLUETOOTH SPKR: VINEYARD CONF RM: IT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC SUPPLIES: HR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIRE MISC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIRE MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TEM SHERIFF MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 12 CAMERA REPLACEMENT: HARVESTON MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HR MISC AV EQUIPMENT. -PEG MISC AV EQUIPMENT. PEG STAFF UNIFORMS: TEAM PACE STAFF UNIFORMS: SPEC EVENTS: TCSC INLET FILTER & INSTALLATION: NPDES: PW RETAIL SITE SELECT/RECRUITMENT: ECON 210003 9/8/2022 023031 CABUGUAS, JUN ANGELO FROM THE GROUND UP 8/26 210004 9/8/2022 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES AUG COPIERS LEASE: LIBRARY INC 210005 9/8/2022 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND, JUL COMM ERCIAL/IND'L INSPECTIONS: CONSULTING INC NPDES 210006 9/8/2022 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:IT GOVERNMENT LLC MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:IT MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:IT KEYBOARD & MOUSE REPLACEMENT: Il MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECI MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: IT Amount Paid Check Total 140.28 46.74 109.04 82.16 249.85 39.98 379.46 491.88 -20.65 20.65 32.61 42.92 123.90 19.56 55.76 386.61 20.65 206.61 113.49 1,103.85 352.33 619.46 264.96 366,439.92 7,500.00 311.50 671.56 165.00 492.83 415.55 18.38 363.09 176.44 55.63 2,541.50 1,456.18 884.42 366,439.92 7,500.00 311.50 671.56 165.00 1,521.92 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 210007 9/8/2022 021363 CELLEBRITE INC CERTIFIED OPERATOR TRAINING: POLICE 210008 9/8/2022 009640 CERTIFION CORP DBA AUG ONLINE DATABASE SUBSCR: ENTERSECT POLICE 210009 9/8/2022 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW DIST 210010 9/8/2022 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 television:FOC fitness center 210011 9/8/2022 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA491 SUPPLIES: MPSC & HUMAN SVCS: TCSD SUPPLIES: MPSC & HUMAN SVCS: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: TVM/ACE 210012 9/8/2022 021077 EMPLOYEE #00542 REIMB: RFRSHMNTS: SPECIAL EVENTS 210013 9/8/2022 001233 DANS FEED AND SEED INC MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT 210014 9/8/2022 012600 DAVID EVANS AND JUL DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ ASSOCIATES INC PW17-25 210015 9/8/2022 014359 DPREP INC CRIME PREVENTION TRAINING: POLICE CRIME PREVENTION TRAINING: POLICE CRIME PREVENTION TRAINING: POLICE CRIME PREVENTION TRAINING: POLICE 210016 9/8/2022 022798 DS SERVICES OF AMERICA WATER DELIVERY: CMO INC, SPARKLETTS 210017 9/8/2022 023045 ESSENCE OYOS REFUND: YOUTH MUSICAL PRODUCTION REFUND: YOUTH MUSICAL PRODUCTION 210018 9/8/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: INFO TECH 210019 9/8/2022 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: THEATER SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: THEATER 210020 9/8/2022 019721 GOVCONNECTION INC Computer loan purchases:IT COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: INFO TECH Amount Paid Check Total 3,850.00 3,850.00 200.00 200.00 244.69 244.69 502.19 502.19 216.41 216.48 125.31 558.20 94.93 94.93 32.65 32.65 13,852.66 13,852.66 625.00 625.00 625.00 625.00 2,500.00 48.21 48.21 200.00 200.00 400.00 17.63 17.63 782.58 278.40 1,060.98 1,193.11 605.13 1,798.24 Page:3 apChkLst 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 210021 9/8/2022 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MISC SUPPLIES: SPEC EVENTS: TCSD 454.51 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM/ACE: TCSD 16.23 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: LAND DE\ 74.58 SMALL TOOLS AND EQUIP: TRAFFIC 212.33 EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES: SPORTS: TCSD 1,073.18 1,830.83 210022 9/8/2022 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 698.76 CRC EQUIPMENT: CABINETS: TCSD 761.23 1,459.99 210023 9/8/2022 020893 JEFF KATZ ARCHITECTURAL DSGN SVCS: CRC SPLASH PAD: 41,995.00 41,995.00 CORP PW21-07 210024 9/8/2022 014097 JIMNI SYSTEMS, INC. SVC/INSPECT: PUMP STATIONS: 9,193.75 9,193.75 RRSP/RED HAW 210025 9/8/2022 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA LOCKER TAGS: FIRE STA 95 147.90 TEMECULA TROPHY& DES TROPHIES/AWARDS/PLAQUES: TCSD 43.50 NAMETAGS: THEATER 70.69 262.09 210026 9/8/2022 014432 LANAIR GROUP LLC ADDITIONAL MITEL LICENSES: INFO 2,056.00 2,056.00 TECH 210027 9/8/2022 019884 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC STP NTC: SOCAL STORMWATER -4,612.50 RUNOFF SANTA GERTRUDIS CRK PEDESTRIAN E 192,863.14 188,250.64 210028 9/8/2022 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDYAND JUL HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 2,152.50 WHITMORE JUL HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00011 3,155.50 MEMBERSHIP DUES: ERC MEMBERSHIP 900.00 6,208.00 210029 9/8/2022 015953 LLOYDS DESIGNS GRAPHIC DESIGN: TCSD 2,500.00 2,500.00 210030 9/8/2022 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA VARIOUS SIGNS & SUPPLIES: PARKS: 404.06 404.06 ATHACO INC PW 210031 9/8/2022 015959 MEHEULA MUSIC 1ST INSTALLMENT PERF: THEATER 5,000.00 5,000.00 PRODUCTIONS, AKA JAMES L. FY22/23 MARABOTTO 210032 9/8/2022 019252 NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE REFUND: SEC DEP: CRC 200.00 200.00 210033 9/8/2022 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION SUPPLIES: FIRE PREVENTION WEEK: 3,598.91 3,598.91 ASSN, LEADS ETC INC FIRE 210034 9/8/2022 013319 NEW TANGRAM LLC, DBA ERGO DESK MATERIALS: RISK 1,024.72 1,024.72 TANGRAM Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 210035 9/8/2022 002297 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER ACQUISITION SVCS: NICOLAS/CALLE LLC GIRASOL 210036 9/8/2022 008143 EMPLOYEE #00382 COMPUTER PURCHASE PRGM 210037 9/8/2022 010338 POOLAND ELECTRICAL, VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW PRODUCTS INC 210038 9/8/2022 023006 POS SUPPLY SOLUTIONS INC THERMAL PAPER FOR TRAFFIC: TEM SHERIFF 210039 9/8/2022 019440 QUADIENT INC POSTAGE FOR METER: TEM SHERIFF 210040 9/8/2022 014365 QUADIENT LEASING USA INC POSTAGE METER LEASE: CENTRAL SVCS 210041 9/8/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS BIO-TOX LAB FEES: PD DEPT 210042 9/8/2022 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: THEATER PRESTON PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: FUTURE PHYSIC PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: AOTW 8/5: TVM PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SUMMER MEALS 210043 9/8/2022 017113 SCHOLASTIC INC EDUCATION MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD 210044 9/8/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON AUGUST 700039423268 VARIOUS LOCATIONS AUGUST 700276704365 VARIOUS LOCAT AUGUST 700116137841 VARIOUS LOCAT 210045 9/8/2022 021516 SOMERSET LP, DBA CDBG RENTAL ASSISTANCE: STONEWOOD APT HOMES ROBERSON 210046 9/8/2022 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST PEST CONTROL SVCS: SEVERAL CONTROL INC PARKS PEST CONTROL SVCS: LIBRARY EMERGENCY PEST CTRL: CHANTEMAR PEST CONTROL SVCS: HARVESTON PK EMERG PEST CONTROL SVCS: FRIEND; PEST CONTROL: VAIL RANCH SLOPE 210047 9/8/2022 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC RFRSHMNTS: TCSD 210048 9/8/2022 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT CREDIT: OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD Amount Paid Check Total 28,190.00 28,190.00 1,945.06 1,945.06 1,023.15 1,023.15 439.36 439.36 23.76 23.76 4,985.10 4,985.10 4,002.00 4,002.00 250.00 175.00 225.00 175.00 825.00 20.38 20.38 1,030.32 479.52 33,068.40 34,578.24 1,017.00 1,017.00 493.00 90.00 94.00 95.00 94.00 94.00 960.00 223.02 223.02 -28.59 32.34 3.75 Page:5 apChkLst 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 210049 9/8/2022 017814 STC TRAFFIC INC TRAFFIC ENG SVCS: FIBER OPTIC 6,635.00 6,635.00 COMM PLAN 210050 9/8/2022 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON MISC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS 661.20 661.20 COMPANY 210051 9/8/2022 021242 TWOS COMPANY INC WHOLESALE GIFT PRODUCTS: GIFT 272.60 SHOP:TVM WHOLESALE GIFT PRODUCTS: GIFT SH, 1,131.17 1,403.77 210052 9/8/2022 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: FIRE 80.00 SPA LLC JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: PW PAR 15.00 JUL VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: TCSD 10.00 105.00 210053 9/8/2022 007987 WALMART MISC SUPPLIES FOR TVM/ACE: TCSD 44.12 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 312.53 356.65 210054 9/8/2022 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 3,090.24 CLEANING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 7,761.76 10,852.00 210055 9/8/2022 000339 WEST PUBLISHING AUG CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION: TEM 1,053.45 1,053.45 CORPORATION, SHERIFF DBA:THOMSON REUTERS 210056 9/8/2022 022900 WESTERN SYSTEMS INC TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT: PW TRAFFIC 6,256.17 6,256.17 210057 9/8/2022 021148 WEX BANK 08/07-09/06 FUEL USAGE: POLICE 2,704.57 2,704.57 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,312,421.18 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 09/08/2022 3:58:08PM CITY OF TEMECULA checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,312,421.18 Page:? apChkLst 09/06/2022 1:26:48PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 503032 9/8/2022 021959 AMERICAN HEART CPR/FIRSTAID: MEDIC: FIRE DEPT 2,476.95 2,476.95 ASSOCIATION INC 503033 9/8/2022 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS, LIFEGAURD TRAINING CERTS: 128.25 128.25 HEALTH AND SAFETY SVCS AQUATICS: TCSD 503034 9/8/2022 022670 BROWN, JAMAL DEON, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 3,080.00 3,080.00 JDB TRAINING 503035 9/8/2022 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG 397.42 INSPECTORS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 37.04 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK RANGE 257.20 691.66 503036 9/8/2022 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,226.00 2,226.00 AILEEN 503037 9/8/2022 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES, ENG CONSULT SVCS: OVERLAND: 7,257.20 7,257.20 OF SOUTHERN CALIF., INC. PW20-11 503038 9/8/2022 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, PROMOTIONAL ITEMS: ECO DEV 879.55 CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS MISC PROMOTIONAL ITEMS: ECO DEV 729.82 1,609.37 503039 9/8/2022 021365 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION: RISK 2,032.80 2,032.80 503040 9/8/2022 010530 I P C INDUSTRIES INC, DBA: GOLF CART RENTAL: COLOR RUN: 2,322.88 2,322.88 PRESTIGE GOLF CARS TCSD 503041 9/8/2022 022056 IDETAIL SUPPLY CO ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 92 189.73 189.73 503042 9/8/2022 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 40.00 40.00 PAYMENT 503043 9/8/2022 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC EMERG MEDICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE 239.47 EMERG MEDICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE 20.25 MEDICAL SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE 196.73 456.45 503044 9/8/2022 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 487.20 487.20 503045 9/8/2022 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 732.45 INC MAINT ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS 3,085.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: HISTORY MUSE 139.74 3,957.21 503046 9/8/2022 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC AUG LDSCP MAINT SVCS: PW FACS 10,454.50 AUG LDSCP MAINT SVCS: I-15/79 S: PWC 6,977.00 17,431.50 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/06/2022 1:26:48PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 503047 9/8/2022 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR PRE -EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR 503048 9/8/2022 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT: PREVENTION: INC FIRE 503049 9/8/2022 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT SUPPLY FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CRC FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CRC FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CRC FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVIC C FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS UNIFORM SVCS: PARKS MAINT: PW UNIFORM SVCS: PARKS MAINT: PW UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVIC C FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVIC C FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVIC C FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CHILDR FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CIVIC C UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS UNIFORM SVCS: PW STREETS FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: SENIOR UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS UNIFORM SVCS: PW PARKS 503050 9/8/2022 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES GERSHON JUL 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 503051 9/8/2022 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW SIGN POSTING SVCS: PLANNING SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA21-0987: PLNG SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA21-1455: PLNG SIGN POSTING SVCS: PLANNING 503052 9/8/2022 013482 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES SECURITY SVCS: COLOR RUN: TCSD INC, DBA BAS SECURITY Amount Paid Check Total 108.00 105.00 213.00 21.75 21.75 81.73 29.51 29.51 29.51 95.70 9.70 60.06 60.06 60.06 60.06 48.59 48.59 95.70 95.70 95.70 9.70 9.70 21.37 95.70 57.63 57.63 44.18 23.15 60.06 60.06 1,339.36 71.50 1,563.50 1,635.00 590.63 213.75 427.50 213.75 1,445.63 406.87 406.87 Paget apChkLst 09/06/2022 1:26:48PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 503053 9/8/2022 022051 SINGH GROUP INC HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP 3,651.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP 7,252.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP 3,626.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP 3,701.00 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEANUP 7,227.00 25,457.00 503054 9/8/2022 014783 SOFTRESOURCES, LLC CONSULTING: FINANCIAL SYS 462.52 462.52 UPGRADE MUNIS 503055 9/8/2022 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY Employee Service Recognition 90.64 EMPLOYEE SVC RECOGNITION: HR 211.58 EMPLOYEE SVC RECOGNITION: HR 112.05 414.27 503056 9/8/2022 008977 VALLEY EVENTS INC RENTALS/FACE PAINT: COLOR RUN: 5,395.00 5,395.00 TCSD 503057 9/8/2022 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L. DJ/MC SOUND SVCS: PUMP TRACK 1,950.00 1,950.00 EVENT 503058 9/8/2022 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC ON -CALL CM SVCS: VARIOUS CIP 897.00 897.00 CONSULTING LLC, ANSER PROJECTS ADVISORY MNGMT LLC 503059 9/8/2022 000820 WINCHAK KRIS R, DBA K R W & ENG PLAN CHECK & REVIEW: LAND 1,960.00 1,960.00 ASSOCIATES DEV Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 85,984.60 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 09/06/2022 1:26:48PM CITY OF TEMECULA 28 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 85,984.60 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 09/09/2022 2:13:46PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 210058 9/9/2022 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC 3,601.61 CTR/OLD TOWN MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS MAIM 3,181.23 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 1,316.36 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS MAIM 1,096.72 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 817.86 MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 469.58 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 468.31 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 323.55 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 134.18 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM 123.40 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 47.67 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: FOC 47.08 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL 38.66 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PRKG GARAGE 34.78 SUPPLIES/SMALL TOOLS: HARVESTON: 24.35 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM 23.56 11,748.90 Grand total for UNION BANK: 11.748.90 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 09/09/2022 2:13:46PM CITY OF TEMECULA checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 11,748.90 Paget Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance 2022-11 Approving the Planned Development Overlay Amendment (PA20-1324) (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2022-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324) BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 2022-11 was first introduced at the regularly scheduled meeting of September 13, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Exhibit A ORDINANCE NO.2022-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay was approved by the City Council on October 22, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-05. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as approved shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "PDO". B. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. F. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-19 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-21 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." I. On September 13, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-72"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." Resolution No. 2022-72 and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Provisions for Fiscal Impact Payments A. The City and owner estimate that the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the area resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the Project will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the Project ("City Services Deficit"). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated as of June, 2022 ("FIA"), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City the sum of sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year's payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. "Occupied Residential Property" means an assessor's parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City's budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Planned Development Overlay/Zone Change hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element, as amended. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal I Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community's labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Section 4. Zoning Code Amendment. The City Council hereby amends Chapter 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (PDO-5)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code by amending Article VI, entitled "Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District 5" to read as provided in Exhibit A, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as thought set forth in full. Section 6. Consistency with General Plan. On September 13, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-73, which amended the Land Use Element Map of the Temecula General Plan to change the land use designation of the Project area from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density (M) residential. Therefore, the foregoing amendments outlined in this Ordinance are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. Section 7. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 9. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 131h day of September, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District Chapter 17.22, Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 Table of Contents 17.22.140 Title 17.22.142 Purpose and Intent 17.22.143 Project Vision 17.22.144 Relationship With Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines 1. Development Standards 2. Design Guidelines 3. Approval Authority 17.22.146 Use Regulations 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses 17.22.150 Design Standards and Setback Standards 17.22.152 Vehicular Circulation System Standards 17.22.154 Architectural and Landscape Design Standards 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board Text of new section 17.22.156: 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board E RENDEZVOUS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.140 TITLE Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 shall be known as "PDO-5" (Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.142 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) is intended to provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique residential area within the City. PDO-5 encompasses 22.97 acres and is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Way. PDO-5 consists of Medium Density Residential (7-12.9 dwelling units/acre). The PDO area is surrounded by existing multi -family developments to the north and to the west and existing single-family developments to the south and to the east. This special overlay zoning district regulation is intended to be compatible and complimentary to the existing residential development and M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12.9 dwelling units/acre) proposed as part of the PDO. Performance standards, in addition to those referenced from the City's Development Code and City- wide Design Guidelines, have been provided to ensure internal project compatibility as well as compatibility with the adjacent single-family residential development and to protect these adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Development Code. 17.22.143 PROJECT VISION The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) is intended to provide a comprehensive planning approach to the development of 22.97 acres. The project will include many design features including pedestrian scale of development, unique signage, gathering places, and transit provisions. This is accomplished through its design, development standards and guidelines that will be implemented at the Development Plan stage. A total of two hundred ninety-four (294) apartment units may be developed in the PDO. As depicted on Exhibit A-1, one hundred sixty (160) apartment units may be developed on the upper portion of the PDO ("Upper Site"), which is on the south side, and one hundred thirty-four (134) apartment units may be developed on the lower portion of the PDO ("Lower Site"), which is the North side of the PDO. Large, landscaped buffer areas have been provided within the PDO and the existing single-family development to the east and south. Several obstacles to pedestrian access exist within the PDO, as well as to the existing single-family residential to the east and south, the existing multi -family residential to the north (across Rancho California Road) and the multi -family residential development to the west. A comprehensive sidewalk plan, which has been coordinated 3 with the landscape plan, is included as Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). This plan will foster pedestrian access within the site. When coupled with the existing/proposed pedestrian network, obstacles to pedestrian movement will be greatly reduced. At the time of the Building Department review, the internal access will be reviewed to ensure it complies with the current California Building Code. 17.22.144 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Only multi -family residential land use shall be allowed in the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. 1. Development Standards. a. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.06) that would apply to any development within a Medium Density Residential zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for the PDO except as approved along with this application. This includes site open space and private open space requirements, as well as overall project density. b. Off -Street Parking and Loading Requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. c. Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. 2. Design Guidelines. The City -Wide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. a. Chapter 5 (Multi -Family Residential Design Guidelines) for the PDO. 3. Approval Authority. The Conceptual Site Plan is depicted in Exhibits A-1 through A-3. Approximate building location, as well as approximate location of parking, drive lanes, and access, are shown on these Exhibits. The Conceptual Landscape Plan is depicted in Exhibit C and the Project Statistics are shown in Exhibits G-1 through G-3. Conformance with these Exhibits, as well as the provisions contained below will allow the Approval Authority for projects approved under PDO-5 as follows: a. The approval requirements contained in the City of Temecula Development Code that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete within the PDO. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 17.22.146 USE REGULATIONS M Only multi -family residential land uses shall be allowed in the PDO. 17.22.150 DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The following standards are designed to increase the compatibility within and adjacent to the PDO. A. Building Setbacks. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the eastern property line, which abuts existing single-family residential development. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. 2. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the western property line. 3. All structures shall be setback a minimum of forty-five feet along the southerly property line, which also abuts existing single-family residential development. 4. The northern setback from the property line at Rancho California Road shall be twenty-five feet except for the setback at Building 11, which shall be fifteen feet. B. Pedestrian Linkages. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). C. A pedestrian pathway system shall be provided within the PDO as shown on the Sidewalk Plan. D. Building Height. The height of structures shall not exceed three (3) stories or forty (40) feet in height. E. Trash Enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with landscaping. Exact location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage. F. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided. Final location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer. 17.22.152 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM STANDARDS Vehicular Circulation System Standards have been developed to assure that adequate vehicular access ingress and egress exist for the project, that internal project circulation and vehicle stacking are sufficient and that necessary emergency vehicle access requirements are met. A Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit A) has been prepared with input from the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments. Locations for buildings, access points from Rancho California Road and the western road, drive lanes, parking lots and parking lot landscaping have been provided on the conceptual plan in an effort to depict the overall development of the site. Minor changes or modifications to the conceptual plan may occur provided they are reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula at the development plan stage. Access Points: One access point to the project has been provided to the site from Rancho California Road and one from the westerly drive that is contiguous to the west property line. 1. Access to the PDO shall be provided from the access point on Rancho California Road. 2. A secondary access has been provided along the existing drive that runs along the PDO's westerly boundary. 17.22.154 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES Unless expressly stated below, Residential Architectural Guidelines for the PDO are contained within Chapter 5 of the City -Wide Design Guidelines. A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Form, Height And Massing The Guidelines contained below correspond to the Conceptual Building Elevations (Elevations), contained in Exhibit D. Final design of the individual buildings will utilize the design concepts depicted on the Elevations and may vary from the Elevations depicted in ExhibitD. • Buildings shall not exceed forty feet (40') in height. • Offsets in planes shall be used to reduce the mass of building walls, accent entry areas, and create architectural interest. • Building forms shall be of simple geometry with sculptural or traditional forms acceptable. • Pediment entries, colorful window and door trim shall be used for accent purposes. • Building entries shall be defined and articulated through the use of items such as columns and stone veneers. • Recessed windows and entryways shall be used, especially at the ground level as they add interest tothe product. • Windows or window -type elements are encouraged on second story elements. • Windows on the second floor shall line up with windows on the first floor, making the column/structure apparent. • All sides of the buildings shall receive adequate detail treatment; however, reduced articulation shall be permitted for those sides of the buildings that are not clearly visible from public view. 2. Colors & Materials The colors and materials for the PDO shall be consistent with the color and material boards (Exhibit F). The purpose of the color and material board is to provide continuity between the components of the Rendezvous PDO. A. Colors The predominant building color includes a mixture of earth tones (grays, whites, yellows, tans and browns), similar to colors already used throughout the City of Temecula, other Southern California cities, Warm or light colors are the mostappropriate for trim. Brighter colors shall be limited to signs, doors, window trim and other detailing related to pedestrian areas. B. Materials • Cement Plaster, or similar materials will be used predominantly throughout as will manufactured natural color stone, wood trellis and traditionally inspired concrete red "S" the roofing. • Textured concrete tiles may be used on building elevations. • High quality, dark colored roofing, such as concrete S the are recommended. • Beams, posts and wooden or stone columns shall be simple with camps and toes. Care should be taken so that the width of the column is in proportion to the scale of the building. 3. Roof Forms • Roofs shall be high enough to hide rooftop equipment. • Varied roof heights shall be incorporated to reduce building massing. • The use of cornices is strongly encouraged. B. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Project -Wide Landscaping The landscape theme is intended to support the architectural guidelines by creating screens and buffers where needed and views where opportunities exist. Guidelines: Plant material selection for street trees shall be determined by the City -Wide Design Guidelines and the Temecula Municipal Code, which shall complement the existing street trees on Rancho California Road. Introduced plant materials will be installed so that they reflect the surrounding plant species. Irrigation systems shall include low flow drip systems, consistent with the Section 17.32 of the City's Development Code (Water -Efficient Landscape Design). 2. Project Edges Project edges will be the most visible components of the project. The intent is to provide a comprehensive landscape approach to the project, while paying attention to the particular needs of each edge condition. Plans and Sections are provided to guide future Development Plans in these areas. The Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections are included as Exhibit C. a. Rancho California Road Edae Landscaping along Rancho California Road shall be complimentary to existing landscaping along Rancho California Road, as well as serve to identify the project. Streetscape plantings will be coordinated with interior streetscape and parking treatments as well as with adjacent parcel landscaping. An enhanced project entry will provide a gateway into the project. Reference Exhibits C-1 (Plan) and C-1a (Section): Rancho California Road / Lower Site. . b. Residential (External) /Residential Edge This edge shall serve to buffer the proposed development from the existing single-family residential to the east. A minimum fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer shall be required from the eastern property line to any structure. Evergreen trees with broad canopies may be utilized to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibits C-3 and C-3a: Lower Site Interface at East. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. c. Residential (Internal)/Residential (External) Edge Slopes created on the eastern and southern slopes shall be extensively landscaped to meet current City Development Code standards. Since these are down slopes of various lengths, trees and shrubs are provided near the top of the slope to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibit C-4 (Section): Upper Site Interface at East and Exhibit C-5 (Section): Upper Site Interface atSouth. 3. Major Entries Special landscaping will occur at the Rancho California Entry that will identify the points of entry and set the tone for the PDO. Plantings will be coordinated with the Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify major entries, as follows. 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Entry Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board S 7-22-IMMEM i, -i L on.. �o41s( EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SECTION LEGEND, PLANS AND SECTIONS Exhibit C-1: Landscape Plan View Rancho California Road / Lower Site Exhibit C-1 a Section 1-1 Rancho California Rd. / Lower Site Exhibits C-2 Plan View Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3 Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3a Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-4 6-6 Upper Site Interface at East Exhibits C-5 Section 7-7 Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-6 Plan View Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-7 Elevation Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-8 Plan View Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-9 Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 1) Exhibit C-9a Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 2) 10 -l-C 2J� � � L11 �• } T 17 rI ;� � • f I r � r PLAN VIEW Lower Site Interface at East Nis Exhibit C-2 Section A HOUSE dim Section C Section D SECTION 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibit C-3a BROAD CANOPY DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL BROAD CANOPY EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL SLOPE OROUNOCOVER & SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL LARGE WKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL .7 I11. M-FAMLY 2:1 SLOPE; DIARIES VARIES FF.SDENTIAL VARIES NATURAL OPEN SPACE VARIES SECTION - � U p per S i to Interface East NTS 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPICAL RF_AR YARD VARIES SWCLE FAMILY FDETiAL I Fes! I I:III.-11 {EXISTING WOOD FENCE TYPICAL Exhibit C-4 R STEEL FENCE TrPIM VINES ATTACHED BROW�Fi4�111{{S.ViI7 ''WW77 DITCH REAR YARD 2:1 SLOPE VARIES VAeR I E SEC310 - Upper Site Interface at So& NTS LAKE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL -�-� MALL EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. SQL FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUB MASSING 7Y?lCAL TIDAL DED1DUCLIS ACCENT TREE 'TYPICAL - 14 tp `- muuF Y FE0De0VL -111 1 i 1 r 11111 11 i =i 41=111— I 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYPICAL a 9 1--1 PQ h} ICh n M T'7 sEcTlox 17.22.155 C LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASS NC TYPICAL BRW CANCPY RCREEN TREE TYP)CAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. PYRAMIDAL EV'E R£EN TREE TYPI kL - 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPICAL. SMALL EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE TYPIM PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS AC ENT TREE TYPICAL 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYPICAL upv �T SINGLE' FAMILY RESIDE TIC. PLAN VIE Upper Site Interface t South NTIS 23 H Chiseled limestone face with concrete cap and base Raised metal letters Date Palms Decorative pots Evergreen trees f Flowering shrubs I Flowering groundcover E, EZVOU, S,r IF . 1.. ELEVATION Major Entry Monument nts RANCHO CALIFORNIARO. - _ " r PROJECT SIGNAGE ACCENT PLANTING 1 INTERLOCKING PAVERS I i CONCRETE BANDS f�; ALTERNATING EVERGREEN TREES AND PALMS FLOWERING SHRUBS v d v f a ��J I • VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENTRY GATES I PLAN VIEW Major Entry Monument nts Exhibit C-a Guidelines: Accent trees with fall or flowering color should be used as identify plantings. Low -scale walls, shrubs, and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used to highlight key areas, such as the base of project entry monuments. Trees should be massed to create an effect similar to native plantings in undisturbed areas. 11 Secondary Entry The secondary entry is located at the westerly edge of the project along an un-named road between this project and the multi -family development to the west. Design elements may include accent plantings, low scale walls, and monumentation. Guidelines: • Shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used at the base of project entry monumentation. • Accent trees, such as palm trees or crape myrtle varieties should be used to identify entries. 12 Project -Wide Hardscape Concept Hardscape elements shall be used in coordination with the architecture and landscaping to provide a link between the street edge and the development. Attention to hardscape details creates a strong sense of community by relating different areas of the developments to an overriding theme. In addition, property hardscaping can improve pedestrian safety, movement and visual enjoyment of public areas. a. Pavina Materials The use of enriched paving treatment has been recommended for the major entry into the site and intersections to highlight key areas of the streetscape. Guidelines: Paving materials that incorporate natural rock or stone are highly recommended. Major intersection and project entry crosswalks shall be highlighted by enriched paving treatments such as stamped, colored concrete, interlocking pavers or cobblestones to visually denote crosswalks. Near buildings, paving materials should be consistent with major intersection treatments, using interlocking pavers, cobblestone, natural stone, ortextured concrete. 13 EXHIBIT SECTION .17.22.156 C SMOOTH CONCRETE BANOS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL Enhanced Alternate FREE STANDING PILASTER W/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE & BUILT-IN LAMP TYPICAL at Intersection EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.1S6 C INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL c� SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL COBBLE STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE TYPICAL--- I & tSUIL PLAN VIEW (2 Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 2 NTS 15 b. Street Furniture Hardscape elements such as benches, bollards, paving and light standards shall reflect the theme of the overall PDO, complimenting the architecture and landscape. Materials used in construction of street furniture should complement architectural materials used on adjacent buildings. Safety and durability need special consideration. Guidelines: • Natural stone, rock, textured concrete, wood, or metal are all acceptable building materials for street furniture. • Street furniture should be located within gathering and/or shaded seating areas within the property. • All benches should be of simple design of wrought -iron metal, or concrete with supports and scroll detailing and finished natural wood slats for the sitting area. • Trash receptacles and other minor details must relate to the architectural style of buildings. 16 ®1S SIITLIH 17.22.156 C BENCH c. Walls and Fences When necessary for security or to mitigate grading, walls or retaining walls and fences shall reinforce the project's identity and image. The material, style, and height of walls and fences shall in order to ensure visual consistency, provide an element of continuity throughout the property. Guidelines: • Construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project architecture with dark -toned hues and earthtone colors preferred. The use of a hedge/bollard treatment is acceptable and encouraged. • For walls built to screen ancillary structures adjacent to buildings, such as trash enclosures, construction materials should complement the architecture. • The horizontal mass of continuous walls should be softened by landscape planting and vines. • Tubular steel or an equivalent may be used for fencing. 4. Lighting Concept In the design of lighting, careful consideration must be given the overall architectural theme as well as to the safety of the site users. An emphasis should be made to emphasize human scale in public areas adjacent to buildings and along walks. Guidelines: • Warm white lighting is encouraged, bright colored or blinking lights shall not be allowed. • Light standards will blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, and other hardscape elements. • Design and placement of site lighting must minimize glare affecting adjacent properties, buildings and roadways. • Natural stone and concrete may be used for light standard bases. • All lighting shall be consistent with the Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. • "Old town Style" lighting fixtures, either attached to building or pedestal mounted along pedestrian walkways and gathering areas shall be utilized. 17 EXHIBIT SECTION 17. 22.156 C LIGHTING STANDARD 5. Monument Signs a. General Requirements • All portions of Entry Monuments including the base and cap, shall be constructed with materials and colors as shown on Exhibit F. All monument signs shall include the name of the project and the lettering shall be no higher than 19" and no smaller than three inches (3") in height. Low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or annual color shall surround the base of the sign. 19 0 0 o o Sohn Watson ® ® ® ® ® ® Architects, Inc. Way Sa726 nta Santa arr bara Sa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 �• FMA _. :. . BuildingT #12 (Type G ) End Elevation Color Scheme 2 3/16" - 1'-0" 14 w° CQi W U O\ � N O � � 30063 —_ 30063 Qa U m 41 -- r ®® �� d � Q Q PA20-1325 ®® I �� inii� �� F�M11L N n Building #12 (Type G) Side Elevation Copyright Color Scheme 2 o DATE 3/16" =1'-0" sx a Rendezvous Phase II Color Schemes and Materials Color Scheme #1 Scheme #2 Scheme #3 Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Scheme#7 Scheme #8 Integral Plaster Color Similar To: Description 1 Omega #20 Body Color I Body Color 2 Body Clr Body Clr DE6155 Soft Ivory Light Cream 2 Omega #2-1/2 A 948 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DE6312 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grey/Green 3 Omega #413 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 DET654 Creme Fraiche Light/Medium Cream 4 Omega #A 560 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DET605 Drifting Doumstream Dark "Dull" Green 5 Omega #414 Body Color 1 Body Clr DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray 6 Omega #1/2 A 865 Body Color 1 DET665 Grain Mill Medium Cream/Oranme 7 Omega #418 Body Clr DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brawn COLOR 8 Omega #18 Trim Trim Trim Trim Entry Trm Trim Trim Trim DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whitish SCHEME 9 Boral Tesoro Blend Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile B-317- R Roof Bundle Taupe - Same Color G 10 DE158 Nor[hem Territory All Doors All Doors All Doors DEA 158 Northern Territory —pprx Dark Br— -Semi-Gloss BUILDING I I French Limestone "Ryland Buff' Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile I Wall Tile I Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 SCHEME 2 12 Chiseled Limestone "Cavenpe" Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 13 Sand Canvon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile A6.2 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Bind" Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt N=,CohwSchemc#lnotmedonPhasI Exhibit E— I 0l 0j Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) End Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32" = P-0" mono RI '.' IIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIII� '' :: :: Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) Long Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32"= V_0"__________ ::No umom 0000 0000 0000 iiiiiil IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Iliiiiiiiiiiiliiiliii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) Short Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 -41 Exhibit E-3 Sohn Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chetham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 PA20-1325 10. SCHEME BUILDING 3A A6-4 Sohn Watson a2 la ,roe=.�.��, Architects, Inc. 726 Chethant Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 0 �i OO ® �i � � — (805)-969-7280 MM r'1 ®ME JT] ®®0063 Tj _06 w L ME w Building #11 (Type H) rx End Elevation ° Color Scheme 4 a o 3/32" = P-0" q U. W U D\ y � � 7 �i . P1 ix; o c 3 d a F OO OO OO o PA20-1325 30063 30063 4 Copyright DATE -_-_ �rmmm��mmm�� Buildings #11 (Type H) Long Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 COLOR 3/32" = 1'-0" SCHEME BUILDING H SCHEME A6-5 Exhibit E-4 Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage Ph Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Color Schcvic XB Color9cFcmc XB .iiwm, a„wWimr Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Gera a Color Scheme Assi ents Typical Garage Trash Enclosure With �n -,.a Bldg #16/Garage 38 Fnd Fl—firm North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Scheme #5 East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 West and South Elevation 1/8" = 11-0 Color Scheme #5 ILw.nc. Pool Bathrooms North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 r7-- T �Pool Bathrooms South Elevation Eathrouin Shower Glcvation Elevation Along Enhy Walk a Garage #35 with Mail Room North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" P Garage #35 with Mail Room South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" Garage #35 with Mail Room West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" Garage #35 with Mail room East Elevation Exhibit E-5 Sohn Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME SMALLER A6.6 Color Scheme #1 "Left and Right" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 Color Scheme #1 "Front and Back" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 2 Story Apartment Building Color Scheme Assignments Color Scheme #2 "Front and Back" Building Type 2A 1/811 = 11-0t1 "Left and Right" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 Building 2 Scheme 1 with Base Tile Building 3 Scheme 2 with Base Tile Building 4 Sche1 with Base Tile Alt Building 8 Schememe 2 with Base Tilc Alt Project Color Schemes and Materials Leasing Pool Baths 2 Story Bldg 2 Story Bldg 3 Story Bldg 3 Story Bldg Exercise Garage Garage Garage Color Scheme #1 Scheme 42 Scheme #3 Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Sche=#7 Scheme #8 Comment Description 1 Omega #20 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Ch Body Clr Formally DE6155 Soft Ivory Light Cream 2 Omega #2-1/2 A 948 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Formally DE6312 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grey/Green 3 Omega #413 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Formally DET654 Creme Fraische Light/Medium Cream 4 Omega #A 560 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Formally DET605 Drifting Downstream Dark "Dull" Green 5 Omega 9414 Body Color 1 Body Clr Formally DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray 6 Omega #1/2 A 865 Body Color 1 Formally DET665 Grain Mill Medium Cream/Orange 7 Omega #418 Body Ch Formally DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brown 8 Omega #18 Trim Trim Trim Trim Entry Trm Trim Trim Trim Formally DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whitish 9 Bond Tesoro Blend Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Formally B-317- R Roof Bandle Taupe - Apprx Same Color 10 DE158 Northern Territory All Doors All Doors All Doors Formally DEA 158 Northern Territory Dark Brown - Semi -Gloss 11 French Limestone "Ryland Buff' Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 12 Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 13 Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Bind" Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Exhibit E-6 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME 2STORY A6.1 John Watson Color Scheme#3 Color Schcnia ?4 Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 ® ® ® ff ® in �e ® ��JE "Left" "Left" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" w Color sd- c #3 Color Scheme 14 a� O101 O O O O 101 O O O masc^w,i O ' ® Q ® IQmill n. U N 4 U "Top" "Top" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A `� H 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" PA18-1380 Color Scheme #3 Color Scheme #4 O O O O O O O O O O Copyright .,. DATE Q Q Q Q Q LOA "Bottom" 'Bottom" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" COLOR SCHEME Apartment Building 3 STORY 3 Story P g BUILDLINGS Color Scheme Assignments Building 1 Scb—e 4 with Base Tile Building 5 Scheme 4 with Base Tile Alt A6-2 Building 6 Scheme 3 with Base Tile Alt Building Scheme3with B—Tile Exhibit E-7 Typical Garage MTrash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage Wlth Trash Enclosure Game Color Scheme Assimunents Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Wln _ ���■ ����� MEND �� .I: ���■ ����� moms �� ■�■ ���■ ����� moms _ �� ... �e!;st■ ����� momzs: 2: as: 2.. mom � ";' �2 11,1q, ICI � -- IIII .I ,I =Mn mom i II IIII MnM- -------------------------- II II. nm NONE 111mm�n 11 11 nmm�n n nm �ersl� nm North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Schcmc A� East Flcration 1'-o West and South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Scheme #5 Ellwu re . Pool Bathrooms North Elevation 1/8" = P-0 Tool Bathrooms South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 -'1 Bathroom Shower Elevation Elevation Along Enhv Walk 1/8 1 0 1/8" 1'-0 Exhibit E-8 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME 3STORY A6.3 Color 1: Omega #20 (Similar to DE 6155 Soft Ivory) Color 2: Omega #2-1/2 A948 (Similar to DE 6312 Dusty Dream) Color 6: Omega #1/2 A 865 (Similar to DET665 Grain Mill) Color 7: Omega #418 (Similar to DE6200 Handwoven) Color 3: Omega #413 Color 8: Omega #18 (Similar to DET654 (Similar to DEW325 Creme Fraische) Vanilla Shake) Color 4: Omega #A 560 (Similar to DET605 Drifting Downstream) Color 5: Omega #414 (Similar to DE6380 Clouded Vision) i ` i rAh4,. i 64, � :4 arm h4, � :4 r,64, C4 rA L4 , r,64, 6 r'Ah. i. .� ra 64 rj h4. ,rok4 rA k4 ra: , 4 ra4, rA i. r,64, r�4 i. rA: 0A VA VA VA VA V4 VA VA V4 Color 10: DEA 15 8 Northern Territory) "McNichols Grecian 17840032 Used at Gas Meter Doors 1 Roof Tile: Tesoro Blend Barcelona 900 Boral Roofing White Vinyl Window Colosseum Travertine "Roman" Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" French Limestone " French White " Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Blend" Exhibit F John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 0 ct � � o o � ct Cct ct ct �D PA20-1325 Johj A CRMaCA\-� Copyright 0 I DATE November 6, 2020 February 1, 2021 MATERIALS A6.1 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Michael Heslin, Director of Information Technology & Support Services DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve a Three-year Microsoft Enterprise Renewal Agreement with CDW-G for Microsoft Software Licenses PREPARED BY: Damion Patrick, Assistant Director of Information Technology & Support Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a three-year Microsoft Enterprise Renewal Agreement with CDW-G, in the annual amount of $231,100.44, for a total contract amount of $693,301.32 subject to the annual True -up cost as described in recommendation 2; and 2. Approve 20% of the total contract, in the amount of $138,660.26, for the annual True - up cost for the term of the three-year agreement. BACKGROUND: The City standardizes on Microsoft products for its desktop and server operating systems/office applications and has previously participated in the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA). In October of 2016 and November of 2019, the City Council approved a three-year Microsoft EA, utilizing a Master Agreement through the County of Riverside. The Microsoft EA is a cost-effective way to purchase software based on the organization's size, the benefits of Office 365, as well as simplified licensing management. Renewal of the Microsoft EA will provide the City the ability to continue operations, access to email in the Office 365 cloud, and efficiently manage its computing environment and to optimize licensing expenditures. Staff recommends that the City approve a three-year Microsoft Enterprise Renewal Agreement with CDW-G. There are no local vendors on the County of Riverside Reseller List. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds have been budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Information Technology Budget. Subsequent years will be subject to budget approval. ATTACHMENTS: Microsoft Agreement Microsoft Enterprise Enrollment Enterprise Enrollment number 71116973 (Microsoft to complete) Previous Enrollment number 8738290 (Reseller to complete) Volume Licensing Framework ID (if applicable) State and Local This Enrollment must be attached to a signature form to be valid. This Microsoft Enterprise Enrollment is entered into between the entities as identified in the signature form as of the effective date. Enrolled Affiliate represents and warrants it is the same Customer, or an Affiliate of the Customer, that entered into the Enterprise Agreement identified on the program signature form. This Enrollment consists of: (1) these terms and conditions, (2) the terms of the Enterprise Agreement identified on the signature form, (3) the Product Selection Form, (4) the Product Terms, (5) the Online Services Terms, (6) any Supplemental Contact Information Form, Previous Agreement/Enrollment form, and other forms that may be required, and (7) any order submitted under this Enrollment. This Enrollment may only be entered into under a 2011 or later Enterprise Agreement. By entering into this Enrollment, Enrolled Affiliate agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the Enterprise Agreement. All terms used but not defined are located at htto://www.microsoft.corrVlicensinct/contracts. In the event of any conflict the terms of this Agreement control. Effective date. If Enrolled Affiliate is renewing Software Assurance or Subscription Licenses from one or more previous Enrollments or agreements, then the effective date will be the day after the first prior Enrollment or agreement expires or terminates. If this Enrollment is renewed, the effective date of the renewal term will be the day after the Expiration Date of the initial term. Otherwise, the effective date will be the date this Enrollment is accepted by Microsoft. Any reference to "anniversary date" refers to the anniversary of the effective date of the applicable initial or renewal term for each year this Enrollment is in effect. Term. The initial term of this Enrollment will expire on the last day of the month, 36 full calendar months from the effective date of the initial term. The renewal term will expire 36 full calendar months after the effective date of the renewal term. Terms and Conditions 1. Definitions. Terms used but not defined in this Enrollmentwill have the definition in the EnterpriseAgreement. The following definitions are used in this Enrollment: "Additional Product"means any Product identified as such in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment. "Community" means the community consisting of one or more of the following: (1) a Government, (2) an Enrolled Affiliate using eligible Government Community Cloud Services to provide solutions to a Government or a qualified member of the Community, or (3) a Customer with Customer Data that is subject to Government regulations for which Customer determines and Microsoft agrees that the use of Government Community Cloud Services is appropriate to meet Customer's regulatory requirements. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 1 of 10 Document X20-10635 Membership in the Community is ultimately at Microsoft's discretion, which may vary by Government Community Cloud Service. "Enterprise Online Service" means any Online Service designated as an Enterprise Online Service in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate under this Enrollment. Enterprise Online Services are treated as Online Services, except as noted. "Enterprise Product" means any Desktop Platform Product that Microsoft designates as an Enterprise Product in the Product Terms and chosen by Enrolled Affiliate underthis Enrollment. Enterprise Products must be licensed for all Qualified Devices and Qualified Users on an Enterprise -wide basis under this program. "Expiration Date" means the date upon which the Enrollment expires. "Federal Agency" means a bureau, office, agency, department or other entity of the United States Government. "Government" means a Federal Agency, State/Local Entity, or Tribal Entity acting in its governmental capacity. "Government Community Cloud Services" means Microsoft Online Services that are provisioned in Microsoft's multi -tenant data centers for exclusive use by orforthe Community and offered in accordance with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Special Publication 800-145. Microsoft Online Services that are Government Community Cloud Services are designated as such in the Use Rights and Product Terms. "Industry Device" (also known as line of business device) means any devicethat: (1) is not useable in its deployed configuration as a general purpose personal computing device (such as a personal computer), a multi -function server, or a commercially viable substitute for one of these systems; and (2) only employs an industry or task -specific software program (e.g. a computer -aided design program used by an architect or a point of sale program) ("Industry Program"). The device may include features and functions derived from Microsoft software or third -party software. If the device performs desktop functions (such as email, word processing, spreadsheets, database, network or Internet browsing, or scheduling, or personal finance), then the desktop functions: (1) may only be used for the purpose of supporting the Industry Program functionality; and (2) must be technically integrated with the Industry Program or employ technically enforced policies or architecture to operate only when used with the Industry Program functionality. "Managed Device" means any device on which any Affiliate in the Enterprise directly or indirectly controls one or more operating system environments. Examples of Managed Devices can be found in the Product Terms. "Qualified Device" means any device that is used by or for the benefit of Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise and is: (1) a personal desktop computer, portable computer, workstation, or similar device capable of running Windows Pro locally (in a physical or virtual operating system environment), or (2) a device used to access a virtual desktop infrastructure ("VDI"). Qualified Devices do not include any device that is: (1) designated as a server and not used as a personal computer, (2) an Industry Device, or (3) not a Managed Device. At its option, the Enrolled Affiliate may designate any device excluded above (e.g., Industry Device) that is used by orfor the benefit of the Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise as a Qualified Device for all or a subset of Enterprise Products or Online Services the Enrolled Affiliate has selected. "Qualified User' means a person (e g., employee, consultant, contingent staff) who: (1) is a user of a Qualified Device, or (2) accesses any server software requiring an Enterprise Product Client Access License or any Enterprise Online Service. It does not include a person who accesses server software or an Online Service solely under a License identified in the Qualified User exemptions in the Product Terms. "Reseller" means an entity authorized by Microsoft to resell Licenses under this program and engaged by an Enrolled Affiliate to provide pre- and post -transaction assistance related to this agreement, - "Reserved License" means for an Online Service identified as eligible for true -ups in the Product Terms, the License reserved by Enrolled Affiliate priorto use and for which Microsoft will make the Online Service available for activation. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0Ct2019) Page 2 of 10 Document X20-10635 "State/Local Entity" means (1) any agency of a state or local government in the United States, or (2) any United States county, borough, commonwealth, city, municipality, town, township, special purpose district, or other similar type of governmental instrumentality established by the laws of Customer's state and located within Customer's state'sjurisdiction and geographic boundaries "Tribal Entity" means a federally recognized tribal entity performing tribal governmental functions and eligible forfunding and services from the U.S. Departmentof Interior by virtue of its status as an Indian tribe. "Use Rights" means, with respect to any licensing program, the use rights orterms of servicefor each Productand version published forthat licensing program at the Volume Licensing Site and updated from time to time. The Use Rights include the Product -Specific License Terms, the License Model terms, the Universal License Terms, the Data Protection Terms, and the Other Legal Terms. The Use Rights supersede the terms of any end user license agreement (on -screen or otherwise) that accompanies a Prod uct "Volume Licensing Site" means http://w Av microsoft.corNlicensing/contracts ora successorsite 2. Order requirements. a. Minimum order requirements. Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise must have a minimum of 250 Qualified Users or Qualified Devices. The initial order must include at least 250 Licenses for Enterprise Products or Enterprise Online Services. (i) Enterprise commitment. Enrolled Affiliate must order enough Licenses to cover all Qualified Users or Qualified Devices, depending on the License Type, with one or more Enterprise Products or a mix of Enterprise Products and the corresponding Enterprise Online Services (as long as all Qualified Devices not covered by a License are only used by users covered with a user License). (ii) Enterprise Online Services only. If no Enterprise Product is ordered, then Enrolled Affiliate need only maintain at least 250 Subscription Licenses for Enterprise Online Services. b. Additional Products. Upon satisfying the minimum order requirements above, Enrolled Affiliate may order Additional Products. c. Use Rights for Enterprise Products. For Enterprise Products, if a new Product version has more restrictive use rights than the version that is current at the start of the applicable initial or renewal term of the Enrollment, those more restrictive use rights will not apply to Enrolled Affiliate's use of that Productduring that term. d. Countryof usage. Enrolled Affiliate must specify the countries where Licenses will be used on its initial order and on any additional orders. e. Resellers. Enrolled Affiliate must choose and maintain a Reseller authorized in the United States. Enrolled Affiliate will acquire its Licenses through its chosen Reseller. Orders must be submitted to the Reseller who will transmit the order to Microsoft. The Reseller and Enrolled Affiliate determine pricing and payment terms as between them, and Microsoftwill invoicethe Reseller based on those terms. Throughout this Agreement the term "price" refers to reference price. Resellers and other third parties do not have authority to bind or impose any obligation or liability on Microsoft. f. Adding Products. (i) Adding new Products not previously ordered. New Enterprise Products or Enterprise Online Services maybe added at any time by contacting a Microsoft Account Manager or Reseller. New Additional Products, other than Online Services, may be used if an order is placed in the month the Product is first used. For Additional Products that are Online Services, an initial order for the Online Service is required prior to use. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 3 of 10 Document X20-10635 (ii) Adding Licenses for previously ordered Products. Additional Licenses for previously ordered Products other than Online Services may be added at any time but must be included in the next true -up order. Additional Licenses for Online Services must beordered prior to use, unless the Online Services are (1) identified as eligible for true -up in the Product Terms or (2) included as part of other Licenses. g. True -up requirements. Enrolled Affiliate must submit an annual true -up order that accounts for any changes since the initial order or last order. If there are no changes, then an update statement must be submitted instead of a true -up order. (i) Enterprise Products. For Enterprise Products, Enrolled Affiliate must determine the numberof Qualified Devices and Qualified Users (if ordering user -based Licenses) at the timethetrue-up orderis placed and must order additional Licenses for alI Qualified Devices and Qualified Users that are not already covered by existing Licenses, including any Enterprise Online Services. (ii) Additional Products. For Additional Products that have been previously ordered under this Enrollment, Enrolled Affiliate must determine the maximum number of Additional Products used since the latter of the initial order, the last true -up order, or the prior anniversary date and submit a true -up order that accounts for any increase (iii)Online Services. For Online Services identified as eligible for true -up in the Product Terms, Enrolled Affiliate may place a reservation orderforthe additional Licenses priorto use and payment may be deferred until the next true -up order. Microsoft will provide a report of Reserved Licenses ordered but not yet invoiced to Enrolled Affiliate and its Reseller. Reserved Licenseswill be invoiced retrospectively to the month in which they were ordered. (iv) Subscription License reductions. Enrolled Affiliate may reduce the quantity of Subscription Licenses at the Enrollment anniversary date on a prospective basis if permitted in the Product Terms, as follows. 1) For Subscription Licenses that are part of an Enterprise -wide purchase, Licenses may be reduced if the total quantity of Licenses and Software Assurancefor an applicable group meets or exceeds the quantity of Qualified Devices and Qualified Users (if ordering user -based Licenses) identified on the Product Selection Form, and includes any additional Qualified Devicesand Qualified Usersadded in any priortrue-up orders. Step-up Licenses do not count towards this total count. 2) For Enterprise Online Services that are not a part of an Enterprise -wide purchase, Licenses can be reduced as long as the initial order minimum requirements are maintained. 3) For Additional Products available as Subscription Licenses, Enrolled Affiliate may reduce the Licenses. If the License count is reduced to zero, then Enrolled Affiliate's use of the applicable Subscription Licensewill be cancelled. Invoices will be adjusted to reflectany reductions in Subscription Licenses at the true -up order Enrollment anniversary date and effective as of such date. (v) Update statement. An update statement must be submitted instead of a true -up order if, since the initial order or last true -up order, Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise: (1) has not changed the number of Qualified Devices and Qualified Users licensed with Enterprise Prod ucts or Enterprise Online Services; and (2) has not increased its usage of Additional Products. This update statement must be signed by Enrolled Affiliate's authorized representative. (vi) True -up order period. The true -up order or update statement must be received by Microsoft between 60 and 30 days priorto each Enrollment anniversary date. The third- yeartrue-up orderor update statement is due within 30 days priorto the Expiration Date, and any license reservationswithin this 30 day period will notbe accepted. Enrolled Affiliate EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 4 of 10 Document X20-10635 may submit true -up orders more often to account for increases in Product usage, but an annual true -up order or update statement must still be submitted during the annual order period. (vii)Late true -up order. If the true -up order or update statement is not received when due, Microsoft will invoice Reseller for all Reserved Licenses not previously invoiced and Subscription License reductions cannot be reported until the following Enrollment anniversary date (or at Enrollment renewal, as applicable). h. Step-up Licenses. For Licenses eligible for a step-up under this Enrollment, Enrolled Affiliate may step-up to a higher ed ition or suite as follows: (i) For step-up Licenses included on an initial order, Enrolled Affiliate may order according to the true -up process. (i i) If step-up Licenses are not included on an initial order, Enrolled Affiliate may step-up initially by following the process described in the Section titled "Adding new Products not previously ordered," then foradditional step-up Licenses, by following the true -up order process. i. Clerical errors. Microsoft may correct clerical errors in this Enrollment, and any documents submitted with or under this Enrollment, by providing notice by email and a reasonable opportunity for Enrolled Affiliate to object to the correction. Clerical errors include minor mistakes, unintentional additions and omissions. This provision does not apply to material terms, such as the identity, quantity or price of a Product ordered. j. Verifying compliance. Microsoft may, in its discretion and at its expense, verify compliance with this Enrollmentas setforth in the Enterprise Agreement. 3. Pricing. a. Price Levels. For both the initial and any renewal term Enrolled Affiliate's Price Level for all Products ordered under this Enrollment will be Level "D" throughout the term of the Enrollment. b. Setting Prices. Enrolled Affiliate's prices for each Product or Service will be established by its Reseller Except for Online Services designated in the Product Terms as being exempt from fixed pricing, As long as Enrolled Affiliate continues to qualify for the same price level, Microsoft's prices for Resellers for each Product or Service ordered will be fixed throughout the applicable initial or renewal Enrollment term. Microsoft's prices to Resellers are reestablished at the beginning of the renewal term. 4. Payment terms. For the initial or renewal order, Microsoft will invoice Enrolled Affiliate's Reseller in three equal annual installments. The first installment will be invoiced upon Microsoft's acceptance of this Enrollment and remaining installments will be invoiced on each subsequent Enrollment anniversary date. Subsequent orders are invoiced upon acceptance of the order and Enrolled Affiliate may elect to pay annually or upfront for Online Services and upfrontfor all other Licenses. 5. End of Enrollment term and termination. a. General. At the Expiration Date, Enrolled Affiliate must immediately order and pay for Licenses for Products it has used but has not previously submitted an order, except as otherwise provided in this Enrollment. b. Renewal option. At the Expiration Date of the initial term, Enrolled Affiliate can renew Products by renewing this Enrollment for one additional 36-month term or by signing a new Enrollment. Microsoft must receive a Renewal Form, Product Selection Form, and renewal order prior to or at the Expiration Date. Microsoft will not unreasonably reject any renewal. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 5 of 10 Document X20-10635 Microsoft may make changes to this program that will make it necessary for Customer and its Enrolled Affiliates to enter into new agreements and Enrollments at renewal. c. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew. (i) Software Assurance. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew Software Assurance for any Product under its Enrollment, then Enrolled Affiliate will not be permitted to order Software Assurance later without first acquiring a new License with Software Assurance. (ii) Online Services eligible for an Extended Term. ForOnline Services identified as eligible for an Extended Term in the Product Terms, the following options are available at the end of the Enrollment initial or renewal term. 1) Extended Term. Licenses for Online Services will automatically expire in accordance with the terms of the Enrollment. An extended term feature that allows Online Services to continue month -to -month ("Extended Term") is available. During the Extended Term, Online Services will be invoiced monthly at the then -current published price as of the Expiration Date plus a 3% administrative fee for up to one year. If Enrolled Affiliate wants an Extended Term, Enrolled Affiliate must submit a request to Microsoft at least 30 days prior to the Expiration Date. 2) Cancellation during Extended Term. At any time during the first year of the Extended Term, Enrolled Affiliate may terminate the Extended Term by submitting a notice of cancellation to Microsoft for each Online Service. Thereafter, either party may terminate the Extended Term by providing the other with a notice of cancellation foreach Online Service. Cancellation will be effective at the end of the month following 30 days after Microsoft has received or issued the notice (iii)Subscription Licenses and Online Services not eligible for an Extended Term. If Enrolled Affiliate elects not to renew, the Licenses will be cancelled and will terminate as of the Expiration Date. Any associated media must be uninstalled and destroyed and Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise must discontinue use. Microsoft may request written certification to verify compliance. d. Termination for cause. Any termination for cause of this Enrollment will be subject to the "Termination for cause" section of the Agreement. In addition, it shall be a breach of this Enrollment if Enrolled Affiliate or any Affiliate in the Enterprise that uses Government Community Cloud Services fails to meet and maintain the conditions of membership in the definition of Community. e. Early termination. Any early termination of this Enrollment will be subject to the "Early Termination" Section of the Enterprise Agreement. For Subscription Licenses, in the event of a breach by Microsoft, or if Microsoft terminates an Online Sery ice for reg ulatory reasons, M icrosoftwi I I issue Reseller a credit for any amount paid in advance forthe period after termination. 6. Government Community Cloud. a. Community requirements. If Enrolled Affiliate purchases Government Community Goud Services, Enrolled Affiliate certifies that it is a member of the Community and agrees to use Government Community Cloud Services solely in its capacity as a member of the Community and, for eligible Government Community Cloud Services, for the benefit of end users that are members of the Community. Use of Government Community Cloud Services by an entity that is not a memberof the Community orto provide services to non -Community members is strictly prohibited and could result in termination of Enrolled Affiliate's license(s) for Govemment Community Cloud Services without notice. Enrolled Affiliate acknowledges that only Community members may use Government Community Cloud Services. b. All terms and conditions applicable to non -Government Community Cloud Services also apply EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0Ct2019) Page 6 of 10 Document X20-10635 to their corresponding Government Community Cloud Services, except as otherwise noted in the Use Rights, Product Terms, and this Enrollment. c. Enrolled Affiliate may not deploy or use Government Community Cloud Services and corresponding non -Government Community Cloud Services in the same domain. d. Use Rights for Government Community Cloud Services. For Government Community Cloud Services, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Use Rights: (i) Government Community Cloud Services will be offered only within the United States. (ii) Additional European Terms, as set forth in the Use Rights, will not apply. (iii) References to geographic areas in the Use Rights with respect to the location of Customer Data at rest, as set forth in the Use Rights, refer only to the United States. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(Oct2019) Page 7 of 10 DocumentX20-10635 Enrollment Details 1, Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise. a. Identify which Agency Affiliates are included in the Enterprise. (Required) Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise must consist of entire offices, bureaus, agencies, departments or other entities of Enrolled Affiliate, notpartial offices, bureaus, agencies, ordepartments, orother partial entities. Check only one box in this section. If no boxes are checked, Microsoft will deem the Enterprise to include the Enrolled Affiliate only. If more than one box is checked, Microsoftwill deem the Enterprise to include the largest number of Affiliates: 0 Enrolled Affiliate only ❑ Enrolled Affiliate and all Affiliates ❑ Enrolled Affiliate and the following Affiliate(s) (Only identify specific affiliates to be included if fewer than all Affiliates are to be included in the Enterprise): ❑ Enrolled Affiliate and all Affiliates, with following Affiliate(s) excluded: b. Please indicate whetherthe Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise will include all newAffiliates acquired after the start of this Enrollment: Include future Affiliates 2. Contact information. Each party will notify the other in writing if any of the information in the following contact information page(s) changes. The asterisks(*) indicate required fields. By providing contact information, Enrolled Affiliate co nsentsto its use for purposes of administering this Enrollment by Microsoft, its Affiliates, and other parties that help administerthis Enrollment. The personal information provided in connection with this Enrollment will be used and protected in accordance with the privacy statement available at htt s.//www.microsoft.comJlicensin lservicecenter. a. Primarycontact. This contact is the primary contact for the Enrollment from within Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise. This contact is also an Online Administratorfor the Volume Licensing Service Center and may grant online access to others. The primary contact will be the default contact for all purposes unless separate contacts are identified for specific purposes Name of entity (must be legal entity name)* City of Temecula Contact name* First Michael Last Heslin Contact email address* Michael.Heslin@temeculaca.gov Street address* 41000 Main Street City* Temecula State* CA Postal code* 92590-2764- (P lease provide the zip + 4, e.g. xxxxx-xxxx) Country* United States Phone* 951-308-6300 Tax ID * indicates required fields b. Notices contactand Online Administrator. This contact (1) receivesthe contractual notices, (2) is the Online Administrator for the Volume Licensing Service Center and may g rant online access to others, and(3)is authorized to order Reserved Licenses for eligible Online Servies, including adding or reassigning Licenses and stepping -up prior to a true -up order. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 8 of 10 Document X20-10635 ❑ Same as primary contact (default if no information is provided below, even if the box is not checked). Contact name* First Michael Last Heslin Contact email address* Michael.Heslin@temeculaca.gov Street address* 41000 Main Street City* Temecula State* CA Postal code* 92590-2764- (Please provide the zip + 4, e.g. xxxxx-xxxx) Country* United States Phone* 951-308-6300 Language preference. Choose the language for notices. English ❑ This contact is a third party (not the Enrolled Affiliate). Warning: This contact receives personally identifiable information of the Customer and its Affiliates. * indicates required fields c. Online Services Manager. This contact is authorized to manage the Online Services ordered under the Enrollment and (for applicable Online Services) to add or reassign Licenses and step-up prior to a true -up order. Same as notices contact and Online Administrator (defaultif no information is provided below, even if box is not checked) Contact name*: First Last Contact email address* Phone* This contact is from a third party organization (not the entity). Warning: This contact receives personally identifiable information of the entity. * indicates required fields d. Reseller information. Reseller contact for this Enrollment is: Reseller company name* CDWLogistics LLC. Street address (PO boxes will not be accepted)* 200 N. Milwaukee Avenue City* Vernon Hills State* IL Postal code* 60061 Country* United States Contact name* Brent Cameron Phone* 847-465-6000 Contact email address* brencam@cdw.com * indicates required fields By signing below, the Reseller identified above confirms that all information provided in this Enrollment is correct. Signature* gt4. ' _knee, Printed name* Brent Cameron Printed title* Software Solutions Advisor Date* 9/8/2022 bfmca,m@ Cdvi-Cow, * indicates required fields Changing a Reseller. If Microsoft or the Reseller chooses to discontinue doing business with each other, Enrolled Affiliate must choose a replacement Reseller. If Enrolled Affiliate or the Reseller intends to terminate their relationship, the initiating party must notify Microsoft and the EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 9 of 10 Document X20-10635 other party using a form provided by Microsoft at least 90 days prior to the date on which the change is to take effect. e. If Enrolled Affiliate requires a separate contactfor any of the following, attach the Supplemental Contact Information form. Otherwise, the notices contact and Online Administrator remains the default. (i) Additional notices contact (ii) Software Assurance manager (iii)Subscriptions manager (iv) Customer Support Manager (CSM) contact 3. Financing elections. Is a purchase under this Enrollment being financed through MS Financing? ❑ Yes, 0 No. If a purchase underthis Enrollment is financed through MS Financing, and Enrolled Affiliate chooses notto finance any associated taxes, it must pay these taxes directly to Microsoft. EA20201 EnrGov(US)SLG(ENG)(0ct2019) Page 10 of 10 Document X20-10635 Microsoft Volume Licensing Amendment to Contract Documents Enrollment Number [ 1 5-0000009095660 This amendment ("Amendment") is entered into between the parties identified on the attached program signature form. It amends the Enrollment or Agreement identified above. All terms used but not defined in this Amendment will have the same meanings provided in that Enrollment or Agreement. Enterprise Enrollment (Indirect) Invoice for Quoted Price Amendment ID M97 The price quoted to Enrolled Affiliate's Reseller is a fixed price based on an estimated order submission date. Microsoft will invoice Enrolled Affiliate's Reseller based on this fixed price quote. If this order is submitted later than the estimated order submission date, Enrolled Affiliate's Reseller will be charged for net new Monthly Subscriptions (including Online Services) forthe period during which these services were not provided Pricing to Enrolled Affiliate is agreed between Enrolled Affiliate and Enrolled Affiliate's Reseller. SKU Number AAF-21855 AAD-34700 AAD-34704 3G U-00001 NYH-00001 SKU Description Win G5 Step-up Win G3 GCC M365 G3 Unified FSA GCC Sub Per User Existing Quantity 500 300 M365 G3 Unified FUSL ` 200 GCC Sub Per User Defender 0365 P1 GCC 500 Sub Per User Teams AC with Dial Out US/CA GCC Sub Add -on 500 Incremental Except for changes made by this Amendment, the Enrollment or Agreement identified above remains unchanged and in full force and effect If there is any conflict between any provision in this Amendment and any provision in the Enrollment or Agreement identified above, this Amendment shall control. L::This_A_mendment must be attached to a signature form to be valid. AmendmentApp v4 0 M97 H Page 1 of 2 Micrnenff Infarnal Ilea Oni - (M97)EnrAmend(Ind)(InvoiceforQuotedPrice)( TM97 B WVW (ENG)(Oct2020)(IU).docx:1 AmendmentApp v4 0 M97 B Page 2 of 2 Enterprise Enrollment Product Selection Form Proposal ID 1237781.003 1 anauane Fnolish (United States) Microsoft I Volume Licensing Enrollment Number Enrolled Affiliate's Enterprise Products and Enterprise Online Services summary for the initial order: Qualified IDevice I User CAL Licensing Profile Devices Qualified Users (Ratio Enterprise Product Platform Model Enterprise 50o 500 1,0 No User Licenses Products Enterprise Quantity Windows Desktop WIN E5 StepUp frm WIN E3 GCC 500 11Aicrosoft 365 Enterprise M365 G3 GCC USL Unified M365 G3 GCC FromSA Unified 200 300 (Enrolled Affiliate's Product Quantities: (Price Group 1 2 3 4 (Enterprise Products Office Professional Plus + Client Access License + Client Access Win E3 + Win E5 + M365 Apps For Enterprise + Office 365 (Plans E1, E3 License + Windows Win VDA + Office 365 (Plans E3 and E5) + and E5) + Microsoft 365 Intune + EMS USL + Microsoft 365 Microsoft 365 Enterprise Enterprise Microsoft 365 Enterprise Enterprise Quantity 500 500 500 500 (Enrolled Affiliate's Price Level: Product Offering I Pool Price Level Enterprise Products and Enterprise Online Services USLs: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using the highest quantity from Groups 1 through 4, D Additional Product Application Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using quantity from Group 1, D Additional Product Server Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using the highest quantity from Group 2 or 3, D Additional Product Systems Pool: Unless otherwise indicated in associated contract documents, Price level set using quantity from Group 4. D NOTES Page 1 of 2 EA-EASProdSelForm(WW)(ENG) MS Quote Enterprise Enrollment Product Selection Form Microsoft I Volume Licensing Unless otherwise indicated in the associated contract documents, the price level For each Product offering I pool is set as described aboye, based upon the quantity to price level mapping below: Quantity of Licenses and Software Assurance Price Level 2,399 and below A 2,400 to 5,999 B 6,000 to 14,999 C 15 000 and above O Note 1: Enterprise Online Services may not be available in all locations. Please see the Product List for a list of locations where these nay be purchased. Note 2: Enrolled Affiliate acknowledges that in order to use a third party to reimage the Windows Operating System Upgrade, Enrolled 4ffiliate must certify that it has acquired qualifying operating system licenses. The requirement applies to Windows Enterprise OS JpgradeiSee Product Terms for details, Note 3: If Enrolled Affiliate does not order an Enterprise Product or Enterprise Online Service associated with an applicable Product pool, the price level for Additional Products in the same pool will be price level -'A" throughout the term of the Enrollment. Refer to the Qualifying Government Entity Addendum pricing provision for more details on price leveling, Page 2 of 2 EA-EASProdSelForm(VVVV)(ENG) MS Quote 00 Microsoft Volume Licensing Previous Enrollment(s)/Agreement(s) Form Entity Name: City of Temecula Contract that this form is attached to: State Local Government For the purposes of this form, "entity" can mean the signing entity, Customer, Enrolled Affiliate, Government Partner, Institution, or other party entering into a volume licensing program agreement. Please provide a description of the previous Enrollment(s), Agreement(s), Purchasing Account(s), and/or Affiliate Registration(s) being renewed or consolidated into the new contract identified above. a. Entity may select below any previous contract(s) from which to transfer MSDN subscribers to this new contract. Entity shall ensure that each MSDN subscriber transferred is either properly licensed under the new contract or is removed. b. Entity may select below only one previous contract from which to transfer the Software Assurance (SA) Benefit contact details, i.e., benefits contact (not the SA manager) and the program codes, to this new contract. c. An Open License cannot be used to transfer either the SA Benefit details or MSDN subscribers d. The date of the earliest expiring Enrollment/Agreement that contains SA or Online Services will be the effective date of the new contract (or SA coverage period for Select Plus). e. Please insert the number of the earliest expiring Enrollment/Agreement with SA or Online Services in the appropriate fields of the new contract. PrevEnrAgrForm(WW)(ENG)(Oct2019) Page 1 of 1 Document X20-12873 rn C M a` O �O U m w d O to -d 7 m O C Q Ey R E MCD E O a CD p W C F� 0 W v. o O Microsoft Program Signature Form MBA/MBSA number Agreement number 8084445 Volume Licensing 5-0000009095660 Note: Enter the applicable active numbers associated with the documents below. Microsoft requires the associated active number be indicated here, or listed below as new For the purposes of this form, "Customer" can mean the signing entity, Enrolled Affiliate, Government Partner, Institution, or other party entering into a volume licensing program agreement. This signature form and all contract documents identified in the table below are entered into between the Customer and the Microsoft Affiliate signing, as of the effective date identified below. Enterprise Amendment Product Selection Form By signing below, Customer and the Microsoft Affiliate agree that both parties (1) have received, read and understand the above contract documents, including any websites or documents incorporated by reference and any amendments and (2) agree to be bound by the terms of all such documents. Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)* City of Temecula Printed First and Last Name* Ma Printed Title Mayor Signature Date* * indicates required field Signature Printed First and Last Name Printed Title Signature Date (date Microsoft Affiliate countersigns) Agreement Effective Date (may be different than Microsoft's signature date) ProgramSignForm(MSSign)(NA, LatAm)ExBRA, MLI(ENG)(May2020) Page 1 of 2 Document X20-12883 Vll� o5i2 Optional 2nd Customer signature or Outsourcer signature (if applicable) Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)* Signature* Printed First and Last Name* Printed Title Signature Date* * indicates required field Name of Entity (must be legal entity name)* Signature* Printed First and Last Name* Printed Title Signature Date* * indicates required field If Customer requires additional contacts or is reporting multiple previous Enrollments, include the appropriate form(s) with this signature form. After this signature form is signed by the Customer, send it and the Contract Documents to Customer's channel partner or Microsoft account manager, who must submit them to the following address. When the signature form is fully executed by Microsoft, Customer will receive a confirmation copy. Microsoft Corporation Dept. 551, Volume Licensing 6880 Sierra Center Parkway Reno, Nevada 89511 USA ProgramSignForm(MSSign)(NA,LatAm)ExBRA,MLI(ENG)(May2020) Page 2 of 2 Document X20-12883 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve the Seventh Amendment to the Franchise Agreement with CR & R Incorporated PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH CR & R, INC., FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FOR TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES BACKGROUND: On May 28, 1991, the City entered into an exclusive franchise agreement with CR & R Incorporated to provide for the Collection, Transportation, Recycling, Composting, and Disposal for Solid Waste and Construction Debris and for providing Temporary Bin/Roll off Services. The Agreement is periodically amended to reflect changes in legislation, collection services, and methodology for calculating rates. In accordance with SB 1383 regulatory requirements, the Seventh Amendment is to incorporate the deletion of, and or to add or amend various definitions, and certain provisions to include, but are not limited to, procurement, container requirements, schedule for delivery of temporary bin/roll off services, missed collections, indemnification, and force majeure language as it pertains to temporarily interrupted or discontinued services due to unforeseeable circumstances or catastrophic events. The Seventh Amendment also includes required provided services to be performed by CR & R to continue a three -container collection program for source separated recyclable materials, organic waste to include green waste and food waste, and for disposal and collection of trash. The Amendment also includes provisions that require CR & R to implement contamination monitoring and perform route reviews and waste evaluations to ensure both residential and commercial customers within the City of Temecula are disposing of waste in the appropriate collection containers, to minimize contamination and meet SB1383 compliance measures. CR & R will also be responsible for producing applicable education materials and conduct education programs and activities. CR & R will assist the City to develop, and update annually, a list of Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services and provide Commercial Edible Food Generators with information about the City's Edible Food Recovery program. The Seventh Amendment includes additional services that CR & R develop and implement online/web-based application and website tools for improved customer service capability. The City and CR & R will continue to collaborate, coordinate, and assist one another for the implementation and on -going monitoring, and reporting to fulfill the requirements of SB1383 regulations. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City to approve the Seventh Amendment with CR & R Incorporated. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Seventh Amendment RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH CR & R, INC., FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FOR TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On May 28, 1991 the City and CR & R entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement Between the City of Temecula and CR & R Incorporated, for the Collection, Transportation, Recycling, Composting, and Disposal for Solid Waste and Construction Debris and for providing Temporary Bin/Rolloff Services." This Agreement has since been amended, on August 27, 1996, June 24, 1997, July 25, 2000, June 13, 2006, October 27, 2015, and November 28, 2017. Section 2. The State of California has found and declared that the amount of Solid Waste generated in California, coupled with diminishing disposal capacity and interest in minimizing potential environmental impacts from landfilling and the need to conserve natural resources, have created an urgent need for State and local agencies to enact and implement aggressive integrated waste management programs, and the State has, through enactment of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) (California Public Resources Code Section 40000, et seq.) and subsequent related legislation including, but not limited to: the Jobs and Recycling Act of 2011 (AB 341), the Event and Venue Recycling Act of 2004 (AB 2176), SB 1016 (Chapter 343, Statutes of 2008), the Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling Act of 2014 (AB 1826), and the Short -Lived Climate Pollutants Bill of 2016 (SB 1383), directed the responsible State agency, and all local agencies, to promote a reduction in landfill disposal and to maximize the use of feasible waste reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting options in order to reduce the amount of material that must be disposed. Section 3. SB 1383 establishes regulatory requirements for jurisdictions, Generators, haulers, solid waste facilities, and other entities to support achievement of State-wide organic waste disposal reduction targets. Section 4. Regulations implementing SB 1383 require the City to implement collection programs, meet processing facility requirements, conduct contamination monitoring, provide education, maintain records, submit reports, monitor compliance, conduct enforcement, and fulfill other requirements; and, the City has chosen to delegate some of its responsibilities to the Grantee, acting as the City's designee, and Grantee desires to take on these responsibilities. Section 5. The City adopted Ordinance No. 2021-05 (hereinafter "the Ordinance") on December 14, 2021 to implement SB 1383 by amending the Temecula Municipal Code. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment entitled "Seventh Amendment" to the Franchise Agreement with CR & R Incorporated, for the Collection, Transportation, Recycling, Composting, and Disposal of Solid Waste and Construction Debris and for providing Temporary Bin/Rolloff Services. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and attest, respectively, the Amendment, on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2022. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Matt Rahn, Mayor N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CR&R INC., FOR THE COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND FOR PROVIDING TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT to the Franchise Agreement (the "Seventh Amendment") is made and entered into as of , a2022 by and between the City of Temecula a municipal corporation (hereinafter referre to as "City") and CR&R Incorporated (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about May 28, 1991, the City and Grantee entered into an Agreement for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary bin/roll off services, which City and Grantee thereafter amended by mutual agreement times (hereinafter referred to collectively and inclusive of prior amendments as the "Agreement") and, WHEREAS, the State of California has found and declared that the amount of Solid Waste generated in California, coupled with diminishing disposal capacity and interest in minimizing potential environmental impacts from landfilling and the need to conserve natural resources, have created an urgent need for State and local agencies to enact and implement aggressive integrated waste management programs, and the State has, through enactment of the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) (California Public Resources Code Section 40000, et seq.) and subsequent related legislation including, but not limited to: the Jobs and Recycling Act of 2011 (AB 341), the Event and Venue Recycling Act of 2004 (AB 2176), SB 1016 (Chapter 343, Statutes of 2008), the Mandatory Commercial Organics Recycling Act of 2014 (AB 1826), and the Short -Lived Climate Pollutants Bill of 2016 (SB 1383), directed the responsible State agency, and all local agencies, to promote a reduction in landfill disposal and to maximize the use of feasible waste reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting options in order to reduce the amount of material that must be disposed; and, WHEREAS, SB 1383 establishes regulatory requirements for jurisdictions, Generators, haulers, solid waste facilities, and other entities to support achievement of State-wide organic waste disposal reduction targets; and WHEREAS, regulations implementing SB 1383 require the City to implement collection programs, meet processing facility requirements, conduct contamination monitoring, provide education, maintain records, submit reports, monitor compliance, conduct enforcement, and fulfill other requirements; and, the City has chosen to delegate some of its responsibilities to the Grantee, acting as the City's designee, and Grantee desires to take on these responsibilities; and WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance No. 2021-05 (hereinafter "the Ordinance") on December 14, 2021, to implement SB 1383 by amending the Temecula Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, City and Grantee desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein 11086-0022\2648852v4. doe NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises made and recited herein, the parties do hereby enter into this Seventh Amendment as follows: AMENDMENT 1. DEFINITIONS. 1.1 This Seventh Amendment and all terms used herein shall be subject to and construed in a manner consistent Section 2 of the Agreement as amended by Amendment No. 1. to the Agreement, which states: "Whenever any term used in this Franchise Agreement has been defined by Chapter 8.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code or Division 30, Part 1, Chapter 2 of the California Public Resources Code, the definitions in the Municipal Code or Public Resources Code shall apply unless the term is otherwise defined in this Agreement. In the event of any conflict between the defines definitions in the Municipal Code and the definitions in the Public Resources Code, the definitions in the Municipal Code shall control." 1.2 Section 2 (Definitions) of the Agreement is amended to delete the definitions of "Compost Facility," "Extremely Hazardous Waste," "Solid Waste Facility," and "System Facility." 1.3 Section 2 (Definitions) of the Agreement is amended to add or amend, as applicable, the following definitions: "Compost" has the same meaning as in 14 CCR Section 17896.2(a)(4). "Compostable Plastics" or "Compostable Plastic" means plastic materials that meet the ASTM D6400 standard for compostability, or as otherwise described in 14 CCR Section 18984.1(a)(1)(A) or 18984.2(a)(1)(C). "Diversion (or any variation thereof including "Divert")" means activities which reduce or eliminate Discarded Materials from Disposal, including, but not limited to, source reduction, Reuse, salvage, Recycling, and composting. "Excluded Waste" means Hazardous Substance, Hazardous Waste, Infectious Waste, Designated Waste, volatile, corrosive, Medical Waste, infectious, regulated radioactive waste, and toxic substances or material that Facility operator(s) reasonably believe(s) would, as a result of or upon acceptance, Transfer, Processing, or Disposal, be a violation of local, State, or Federal law, regulation, or ordinance, including: land use restrictions or conditions, waste that cannot be Disposed of in Class III 11086-0022\2648852v4.doc 2 Landfills or accepted at the Facility by permit conditions, waste that in Grantee's reasonable opinion would present a significant risk to human health or the environment, cause a nuisance or otherwise create or expose Grantee or City to potential liability; but not including de minimis volumes or concentrations of waste of a type and amount normally found in Single -Family or Multi -Family Solid Waste after implementation of programs for the safe Collection, Processing, Recycling, treatment, and Disposal of batteries and paint in compliance with Sections 41500 and 41802 of the California Public Resources Code. "Facility" or "System Facility" or "Solid Waste Facility" means a Solid Waste Facility, as defined in Public Resources Code section 40194, that for the purposes of this Agreement is designated by the City to be used by the Grantee for the processing, recovery and/or disposal of Solid Waste, including Recyclable Materials and Organic Waste. "Non-Compostable Paper" includes, but is not limited to, paper that is coated in a plastic material that will not breakdown in the composting process, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 18982(a)(41). "Performance -based Compliance Approach" means the method of complying with the SB 1383 Regulations through implementation of a collection system, programs, and policies in accordance with 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 17, or as otherwise defined by 18982(a) (52.5), and all associated requirements. "Process" or "Processing" means the controlled separation, recovery, volume reduction, conversion, or Recycling of Solid Waste including, but not limited to, organized, manual, automated, or mechanical sorting, the use of vehicles for spreading of waste for the purpose of recovery, and/or includes the use of conveyor belts, sorting lines, or volume reduction equipment, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17402(a)(20). "Recyclable Material" means the same thing as Non -Organic Recyclables, they are a subset of Source Separated Recyclable Materials. "Recycle" or "Recycling" means the process of Collecting, sorting, cleansing, treating, and reconfiguring materials for the purpose of returning them to the economic mainstream in the form of raw material for new, Reused, or reconstituted products that meet the quality standards necessary to be used in the marketplace. Recycling includes processes deemed to constitute a reduction of Landfill Disposal pursuant to 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 2. Recycling does not include gasification or transformation as defined in Public Resources Code Section 40201. 11086-0022\2648852v4. doc 3 "Reuse" or any variation thereof, means the use, in the same, or similar, form as it was produced, of a material which might otherwise be discarded, or as otherwise defined in 14 CCR Section 17402.5(b)(2). "Service Level" refers to the number and size of a Generator's Container(s) and the frequency of Collection service, as well as ancillary services such as lock/unlock service, Container push/pull service, etc. "Solid Waste" has the same meaning as defined in Chapter 8.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code and includes for purposes of the Agreement Organic Waste and Recyclable Materials unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. "Source Separated" has the same meaning as defined in Chapter 8.20 of the Temecula Municipal Code, and includes for the purposes of the Agreement, separation of materials by the Generator, Property Owner, Property Owner's employee, property manager, or property manager's employee into different Containers for the purpose of Collection such that Source Separated materials are separated from Gray/Black Container Waste and other Solid Waste for the purposes of Collection and Processing. "SSBCOW" means the same thing as Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste. "SSGCOW" means the same things as Source Separated Blue Container Organic Waste. "Standard Compliance Approach" means the method for complying with the SB 1383 Regulations through implementation of a collection system pursuant to 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 3, and all associated program and policy requirements "Yard Trimmings" means types of SSGCOW resulting from normal yard and landscaping installation, maintenance, or removal that the Generators Source Separate and set out in Green Containers for Collection for the purpose of Processing by the Grantee. 2. SB 1383 SERVICES. A new paragraph J (SB 1383 Services) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) of the Agreement to read as follows: "J. SB 1383 Services. Grantee shall provide all SB 1383- related services required by, and subject to, the provisions of Exhibit "G," which is incorporated as though set forth in full. In the event of any conflict between Exhibit "G" and any of Grantee's other service obligations under the Agreement, the requirements of Exhibit G shall control." 11086-0022\2648852v4, doc 4 3. NEW EXHIBIT. A new Exhibit "G" (Provided Services) is hereby added to the Agreement and incorporated as though set forth in full, to read as set forth in Attachment A to this Seventh Amendment. 4. PROCUREMENT. A new paragraph K (Procurement) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) of the Agreement to read as follows: "K. Procurement. Grantee agrees to coordinate and cooperate with the City to meet its Organic Waste produce procurement target, as required by SB 1383 Regulations." 5. CONTAINERS. A new paragraph L (Container Requirements) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) to read as follows: "L. Container Requirements. Grantee shall use the Grantee - provided Collection containers that are currently located at Generators' premises or provide Generators with collection containers from Grantee's current inventory. No later than January 1, 2036, Grantee shall provide all Generators with collection containers that comply with the container color requirements specified in this Agreement or as otherwise specified in the SB 1383 Regulations. If an existing container breaks or is otherwise rendered non-functional on or after January 1, 2022, the Grantee shall replace the non-functional container with a container that complies with the color requirements of the SB 1383 Regulations. Notwithstanding this paragraph, the Grantee is not required to replace functional containers, including containers purchased prior to January 1, 2022, that do not comply with the color requirements of this Agreement prior to the end of the useful life of those containers, or prior to January 1, 2036, whichever comes first." 6. IDENTIFICATION OF FACILITIES. A new paragraph M (Identification of Facilities) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) of the Agreement to read as follows: "M. Identification of Facilities. If using a Standard Compliance Approach, Grantee shall identify the Facilities to which they will transport Organic Waste as required by the SB 1383 Regulations." 7. SCHEDULE FOR DELIVERY OF CONSTRUCTION AND TEMPORARY BIN/ROLLOFF SERVICES. A new paragraph N (Schedule for Delivery of Construction and Temporary Bin/Roll off Services) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) of the Agreement to read as follows: "N. Schedule for Delivery of Construction and Temporary Bin/Roll off services. Grantee shall deliver construction and temporary bin/roll off services to customers within three working days of request 11086-0022\2648852v4.doc 5 from customer. If Grantee is not able to deliver services within this time period, the City may cause services to be performed by a third party, and the Grantee shall reimburse the City for its costs for such services." 8. MISSED COLLECTION. A new paragraph O (Missed Collection) is added to Section 5 (Services Provided by Grantee) of the Agreement to read as follows: "O. Missed Collection. The Grantee will provide a special pickup, or other corrective action acceptable to a Customer, within forty- eight (48) hours (Saturdays, Sundays and holidays excepted) of oral or written notice to the Grantee of a missed scheduled collection at no charge to the Customer. If the Grantee does not provide corrective action in a timely manner, the City may cause the collection to be performed by a third party, and the Grantee shall reimburse the City for its costs for such collection. In cases where the Grantee has documented that the Customer's Container was not set out at the normal service time, the following conditions apply: (1) For the first occurrence each year the Grantee shall pick up the Container, within forty-eight (48) hours of oral or written notice, at no charge to the Customer. (2) For each subsequent occurrence that year, the Grantee can charge the Customer a "return trip charge" if the Customer requests collection prior to the next scheduled service day for that Customer." 9. ADDITIONAL SERVICES. Section 5.H. (8) is hereby added to the Agreement to read as follows: (8) Grantee shall develop and implement online/web-based application and website tools for improved customer service capability, to include, but not limited to, report missed pickups, allow for ordering of bulky item pickups, temporary bin/roll off services, to request new and additional services, manage customer complaints, and other customer service needs. 10. INDEMNIFICATION. A new paragraph H is added to Section 25 of the Agreement to read as follows: "H Diversion Indemnification. "Grantee's duty to defend and indemnify herein includes payment of all fines and/or penalties imposed by Cal Recycle, subject to the restrictions set forth in Public Resources Code Section 40059.1, if the requirements of AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and/or SB 1383 and corresponding regulations are not met by the Grantee with respect to Solid Waste collected under this Agreement, and such failure is: (i) due to the 11086-0022\2648852v4.doc 6 failure of Grantee to meet its obligations under this Agreement, or, (ii) due to Grantee delays in providing information that prevents Grantee or City from submitting reports required by AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, and/or SB 1383 and corresponding regulations in a timely manner. The foregoing indemnity is expressly conditioned upon the City's implementation of required programs or activities, requested by the Grantee, which are within the City's authority and ability to implement, and which would be effective as a means to increase diversion and maintain compliance with State regulations. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement." 11. FORCE MAJEURE. Section 27.A. (Force Majeure) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced as follows: "A. Force Majeure. "Subject to the notice provisions set forth in this paragraph, Grantee shall not be in default under this Franchise Agreement in the event that any services provided under this agreement by Grantee are temporarily interrupted or discontinued for any of the following reasons: riots, wars, sabotage, civil disturbances, insurrections, explosions, pandemics or pandemic related issues, natural disasters such as floods, earthquakes, landslides and fires, strikes, lockouts, and other labor disruptions and disturbances or other catastrophic events which are beyond the reasonable control of the Grantee. Other catastrophic events do not include the financial inability of the Grantee to perform or failure of the Grantee to obtain any necessary permits or licenses from other governmental agencies. In the event a labor disturbance or disruption interrupts Grantee services, as required under this Franchise Agreement, City may elect to exercise its rights under Section 15 of this Agreement. Within ten (10) days of the force majeure event, Grantee shall notify the City in writing of the specific nature of the force majeure event, how it affects Grantee's performance under the Agreement, and the actions Grantee is taking to mitigate the impact of the force majeure event. Grantee shall thereafter notify the City every thirty (30) days of the continuation of the force majeure event, how it affects Grantee's performance under the Agreement, and the actions Grantee is taking to mitigate the impact of the force majeure event." 12. GENERAL PROVISIONS. 12.1 Remainder Unchanged. Except as specifically modified and amended in this Seventh Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect and binding upon the parties. 12.2 Integration. This Seventh Amendment constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties and supersedes all negotiations or previous agreements between the parties with respect to all or any part of the transaction discussed in this Fifth Amendment. 11086-0022\2648852v4.doc 7 12.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one agreement. 12.4 Effective Date. This Seventh Amendment shall not become effective until September 27, 2022. 12.5 At3t21icable Law. The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this Seventh Amendment. 12.6 References. All references to the Agreement include all their respective terms and provisions. All defined terms utilized in this Seventh Amendment have the same meaning as provided in the Agreement, unless expressly stated to the contrary in this Seventh Amendment. [SIGNATURE BLOCK ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE] 1 1086-0022\26488 52v4. doc 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Seventh Amendment on the date and year first -above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson City Attorney CR&R INCORPORATED Chairman and CEO j By: _ Ca David Ronnenberg COO and Secretary 11086-0022\2648852v4.doe 9 EXHIBIT G PROVIDED SERVICES I. Three -Container Collection Program A. General. Beginning January 1, 2022, Grantee shall provide a three -container Collection program for the separate Collection of Source Separated Recyclable Materials, SSGCOW, and Gray/Black Container Waste as specified in this Agreement, using containers that comply with the requirements of this Agreement and SB 1383 Regulations. Grantee shall not knowingly Collect Blue, Green, or Gray/Black Containers that include Prohibited Container Contaminants. B. Source Separated Reelable Materials Collection, (Blue Container or Lid). 1. Grantee shall provide Blue Containers to Generators for Collection of Source Separated Recyclable Materials and shall provide Source Separated Recyclable Materials Collection service, Grantee shall transport the Source Separated Recyclable Materials to a Facility that recovers the materials designated for Collection, in accordance with SB 1383 Regulations. 2. Source Separated Recyclable Materials that are to be accepted for Collection in the Source Separated Recyclable Materials Collection program include the following: (i) Non -Organic Recyclables such as: aluminum, glass bottles and jars, rigid plastics (marked # 1 through # 7), tin and bi-metal cans; and (ii) SSBCOW such as: Paper Products, Printing and Writing Papers, wood, and dry lumber. C. SSGCOW Collection Green Container). 1. Grantee shall provide Green Containers to Generators for Collection of SSGCOW and shall provide SSGCOW Collection service. Grantee shall transport the SSGCOW to a Facility in accordance with SB 1383 Regulations. 2. SSGCOW that are to be accepted for Collection in the SSGCOW Collection program include the following: Food Scraps; Food -Soiled Paper; Yard Trimmings, and Compostable Plastics. Carpets, Non-Compostable Paper, textiles, and Prohibited Container Contaminants shall not be Collected in the Green Containers. Yard Trimmings that are to be accepted for Collection in the SSGCOW Collection program include the following: green trimmings, grass, weeds, flowers, leaves, pruning's, branches, dead plants, brush, tree trimmings, dead trees weighing no more than 50lbs, and other types of SSGCOW resulting from normal yard and landscaping installation, maintenance, or removal, provided all SSGCOW fits inside the Green Container with the lid closed and does not exceed 150 pounds. 3. Grantee may Collect compliant Compostable Plastics in the Green Containers for Processing. At least two (2) months prior to the commencement of the Collection of Compostable Plastics in the SSGCOW program, Grantee shall provide written notification to the City whether the Facility can or cannot Process and recover these Compostable Plastics in accordance with SB 1383 Regulations. If the Facility can process and recover Compostable Plastics, and Grantee elects to Collect Compostable Plastics in the Green Container, then Grantee 11086-0022\2648852v4,doc 10 shall provide annual written notification to the City that the Facility has and will continue to have the capabilities to Process and recover the Compostable Plastics. If the Facility cannot process and recover Compostable Plastics, then Grantee will not Collect Compostable Plastics in the Green Container. It is also understood that Grantee proposes to process the City's organics through its Anaerobic Digester Facility (AD). AD Facilities do not accept compostable plastics at the current time. 4. Grantee may require Generators to place Food Waste in plastic bags or other wrappings and put the bagged or wrapped Food Waste in the Green Container. At least two (2) months prior to the commencement of the use of plastic bags for the Food Waste program, Grantee shall provide written notification to the City that allowing the use of bags does not inhibit the ability of the City to comply with SB 1383 Regulations, and that the Facility can Process and remove plastic bags when it recovers SSGCOW. Grantee shall provide annual written notification to the City that the Facility has and will continue to have the capabilities to Process and remove plastic bags when it recovers SSGCOW. It is also understood that Grantee proposes to process the City's organics through its Anaerobic Digester Facility (AD). AD Facilities do not accept plastic bags or other wrappings at the current time. D. Grav/Black Container Waste Collection. Grantee shall provide Gray/Black Containers or Lids to Generators for Collection of Gray/Black Container Waste and shall provide Gray/Black Container Waste Collection service. Grantee shall transport the Gray/Black Container Waste to a Facility in accordance with the SB 1383 Regulations. Grantee may allow carpets, and textiles to be placed in the Gray/Black Containers. Prohibited Container Contaminants shall not be Collected in the Gray/Black Containers. Il. Contamination Monitoring A. Route Reviews and Waste Evaluations. Commencing January 1, 2022, Grantee shall be responsible for contamination monitoring on all of its routes consistent with the requirements of the SB 1383 Regulations. Grantee may elect to use either Route Reviews or Waste Evaluations; provided however, that if Grantee complies with SB 1383 Regulations using a Performance -based Compliance Approach, it must use Waste Evaluations. Grantee may fulfill its contamination monitoring obligations in any reasonable manner not inconsistent with the SB 1383 Regulations and this Agreement. 1. Route Reviews. Grantee shall conduct any and all Hauler Route Reviews for Prohibited Container Contaminants in Collection Containers as follows: a. Route Reviews shall be done in a manner that is deemed safe by the Grantee; is approved by the City; is conducted in a manner that results in all Hauler Routes being reviewed annually and is consistent and in accordance with SB 1383 Regulations. b. Containers may be randomly selected along the Hauler Route, and nothing herein shall be construed to require Hauler to inspect every container on a Hauler Route every year. 11086-0022\2648852v4. doc I 1 C. Upon finding Prohibited Container Contaminants in the container, Grantee shall follow the contamination monitoring noticing procedures paragraph B.3 of this Section II. d. Grantee shall maintain all applicable records required under SB 1383 Regulations, and report to the City on a quarterly basis on contamination monitoring activities, route reviews and/or waste evaluations, and actions taken. 2. Waste Evaluations. Grantee shall conduct any and all Waste Evaluations in compliance with the requirements of 14 CCR Section 18984.5(c), and as follows: a. Grantee shall allow the City or its representatives to observe Grantee's Waste Evaluations. The City shall have the right hire a third party for this purpose. b. If Grantee uses a Standard Compliance Approach, Grantee shall conduct Waste Evaluations at least once per year and in two distinct seasons of the year. C. If Grantee uses a Performance -Based Compliance Approach, Grantee shall conduct Waste Evaluations at least twice per year for the Blue and Green Containers and at least once per quarter for the Gray/Black Containers. d. Waste Evaluations must include samples of Source Separated Recyclable Materials, SSGCOW, and Gray/Black Container Waste. e. Waste Evaluations shall include samples from each Container type serviced by the Grantee and shall include samples taken from different areas in the City that are representative of the City's waste stream. f. Waste Evaluations shall include at least the minimum number of samples specified in SB 1383 Regulations. g. Grantee shall Transport all of material Collected for sampling to a sorting area at a permitted Solid Waste Facility where the presence of Prohibited Container Contaminants for each Container type shall be measured to determine the ratio of Prohibited Container Contaminants present in each material stream by weight. To determine the ratio of Prohibited Container Contaminants, the Grantee shall use the following protocol: i. The Grantee shall take one sample of at least a 200 pounds from the material Collected from each material stream for sampling. ii. The 200-pound sample shall be randomly selected from different areas of the pile of Collected material for that material stream. iii. For each 200-pound sample, the Grantee shall remove any Prohibited Container Contaminants and determine the weight of Prohibited Container Contaminants. 11086-0022\2648852v4.doc 12 iv. The Grantee shall determine the ratio of Prohibited Container Contaminants in the sample by dividing the total weight of Prohibited Container Contaminants by the total weight of the sample. h. When the sampled weight of Prohibited Container Contaminants exceeds twenty-five percent (25%) of the measured sample for any material stream, Grantee shall, within fifteen (15) working days of the waste evaluation, notify all Generators on the sampled Hauler Route of their requirement to properly separate materials into the appropriate Containers. The Grantee may provide this information by placing a written notice on the Generators' Containers or the gate or door of the Premises; and/or by mail, email, or electronic message to the Generators. The format of the warning notice shall be approved by the City. If using a Performance -Based Compliance Approach, Grantee shall also notify the City with the same fifteen (15) working days and shall allow representatives of the City and/or Cal Recycle to oversee Grantee's next scheduled quarterly sampling of the Gray/Black Containers. 3. Material Exceptions. Organic Waste that is textiles, carpet, hazardous wood waste, human waste, pet waste, or material subject to a quarantine on movement issued by a County agricultural commissioner is not required to be measured as Organic Waste when calculating the amount of Organic Waste present in the Gray/Black Container Waste. B. Actions upon Identification of Prohibited Container Contaminants. Upon finding Prohibited Container Contaminants in a Container, Grantee shall follow the protocols set forth in this Section. 1. Record Keeping. Grantee's driver or other representative shall record each occurrence of Prohibited Container Contaminants in a written log or in an on -board computer system including date, time, Generator's address, and type of container (Blue, Green, or Gray/Black Container). 2. Courtesy Pick -Up Notices. Upon identification of Prohibited Container Contaminants in a Generator's container, Grantee shall provide the Generator a courtesy pick-up notice. The courtesy pick-up notification shall: (i) inform the Generator of the observed presence of Prohibited Container Contaminants; (ii) include the date and time the Prohibited Container Contaminants were observed; (iii) include information on the Generator's requirement to properly separate materials into the appropriate containers, and the accepted and prohibited materials for Collection in the Blue Container, Green Container, and/or Gray/Black Container; (iv) inform the Generator of the courtesy pick-up of the contaminated materials on this occasion with information that following three consecutive instances of Prohibited Container Contaminants within a six-month time period, Grantee may assess contamination Processing fees. Grantee shall leave the courtesy pick-up notice attached to or adhered to the Generator's contaminated containers; at the Premises' door or gate; or, subject to City's approval, may deliver the notice by mail, e-mail, text message, or other electronic message. 3. Notice of Assessment of Contamination Processing Fees. If the Grantee observes Prohibited Container Contaminants in a Generator's Container on more than three consecutive occasions within a six-month time period and issued courtesy pick-up notices on each of those occasions, the Grantee may impose a contamination Processing fee of $35.00 11086-0022\2648852v4.doe 13 (which will be adjusted annually pursuant to the same CPI Index used for annual rate adjustments). Grantee shall notify the City in its quarterly report of Generators for which contamination Processing fees were assessed. Grantee shall leave a contamination Processing fee notice attached to or adhered to the Generators' contaminated containers; at the Premises' door or gate; or, subject to City's approval, may deliver the notice by mail, e-mail, text message, or other electronic message. The contamination Processing fee notice shall describe the specific material(s) of issue, explain how to correct future set outs, and indicate that the Generator will be charged a contamination Processing fee on its next bill. The format of the contamination Processing fee notice shall be approved by the City. C. Disposal of Contaminated Materials. If the Grantee observes Prohibited Container Contaminants in a Generator's Container(s), Grantee may dispose of the Container's contents, provided Grantee complies with the noticing requirements in subsection A above. III. Education and Outreach A. Grantee shall create all applicable education materials and conduct all education programs and activities as provided by and in accordance with the SB 1383 Regulations. Grantee shall cooperate and coordinate with the City on public education activities. B. Grantee will assist the City to develop, and update annually, a list of Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services operating within the City. The list shall be posted and maintained on both the Grantee's City -specific website and the City's website and update the list annually. The list shall include, at a minimum, the following information about each Food Recovery Organization and each Food Recovery Service: (i) Name and physical address; (ii) Contact information; (iii) Collection service area; and (iv) an indication of types of Edible Food the Food Recovery Service or Food Recovery Organization can accept for Food Recovery. C. Grantee shall assist City to provide Commercial Edible Food Generators on an annual basis with the following information: (i) Information about the City's Edible Food Recovery program; (ii) Information about the Commercial Edible Food Generator requirements under 14 CCR, Division 7, Chapter 12, Article 10; (iii) Information about Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services operating within the City, and where a list of those Food Recovery Organizations and Food Recovery Services can be found; and (iv) Information about actions that Commercial Edible Food Generators can take to prevent the creation of Food Waste. D. The Grantee may provide the information required above by including it with regularly scheduled notices, education materials, billing inserts, or other information disseminated to commercial businesses. E. Grantee shall comply with all applicable public education and outreach record keeping and reporting requirements as provided by the SB 1383 Regulations. 11086-0022\2648852v4.doe 14 IV. Inspections and Enforcement After January 1, 2022, Grantee shall conduct, to the extent delegable, and/or assist City to conduct all inspections and enforcement required by the SB 1383 Regulations. Grantee shall maintain all required records from inspection and enforcement in accordance with the SB 1383 Regulations. If a Performance -based Compliance Approach is used, City agrees to only grant waivers if at least ninety percent (90%) of Single -Family Generators and ninety percent (90%) of Commercial Generators (including Multi -Family Generators) participate in the three -Container Collection program. V. Generator Waiver Program Coordination A. General. In accordance with SB 1383 Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code, the City may grant waivers (de minimis, physical space or Collection frequency) to Generators that impact the scope of Grantee's provision of service for those Generators. Waivers issued shall be subject to compliance with SB 1383 Regulatory requirements, pursuant to 14 CCR Section 18984.11. B. Requests Submitted to Grantee. Generators may submit requests for waivers to Grantee. Within fifteen (15) working days of receiving such a request, Grantee shall: (i) inspect the applicant's premises and verify the accuracy of the information found in the application; and (ii) submit the application, Grantee's recommendation, and any supporting documents to the City. The City shall retain final approval authority regardless of the Grantee's recommendation. Grantee shall report information regarding waivers reviewed on a quarterly basis. C. Grantee Change in Generators' Service Levels. The City shall notify Grantee within fifteen (15) days of any decision to approve a waiver request, and whether such decision will change the service level or Collection service requirements for the Generator. Grantee shall have ten (10 working days to modify the Generator's service level and billing statement, as needed. D. Reverification of Waivers. It shall be the responsibility of the Grantee to verify that the Generators with de minimis, physical space constraint, or Collection frequency waivers continue to meet the waiver requirements set forth in this Section. Grantee shall conduct such reverifications of waivers through inspection of each Generator's premises and review of applicable records at least once every five (5) years for de minimis and physical space constraint waivers. Grantee shall maintain a record of each waiver verification and provide a quarterly report to the City documenting the waiver reverifications performed and recommendations to the City on those waivers that Grantee concludes are no longer warranted. The City shall make a final determination of the waiver eligibility of Generators. E. Grantee Recordkeepiog„ of Generators Granted Waivers. Upon Grantee request, no more than two (2) times per year, the City shall provide Grantee an updated listing of waivers approved by the City, including the Generators' names, mailing address, service address, and type of waiver. Grantee shall maintain waiver -related records and report on waiver verifications, as required herein. 1 1086-0022\26488 52v4, doe 15 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract to Act 1 Construction, Inc. for Community Recreation Center Renovations — Phase 1, PW 19-07 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Principal Civil Engineer William Becerra, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to Act 1 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $3,568,395, for Community Recreation Center Renovations — Phase 1, PW 19-07; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve construction contract change orders up to 10% of the contract amount, $356,839.50; and 3. Make a finding that Community Recreation Center Renovations — Phase 1, PW 19-07 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. BACKGROUND: The Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations is an infrastructure project for the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the CRC. Phase 1 comprises the bulk of rehabilitation work by replacing, repairing, or updating portions of the building's mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, foundation, roof, and accessibility, as needed. This Phase will address all items identified in the ADA Transition Plan throughout the building interior and exterior. Subsequent phases of work will include expansion and renovation of existing office space, recreational rooms, and storage space. On July 12, 2022, City Council approved the plans and specifications, and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Community Recreation Center Renovations — Phase 1, PW 19-07. The construction contract was publicly advertised for bids between August 10, 2022, and September 1, 2022, on the City's online bidding service, PlanetBids. Five (5) bids were received and publicly opened on September 1, 2022. The results are as follows: Rank Bidder Amount 1. Act 1 Construction, Inc. $3,568,395.00 Bo h Engineering, Inc. Non -Responsive Horizon Construction Co. Int'l, Inc. Non -Responsive Spec Construction Co., Inc. Non -Responsive LDCo., Inc. Non -Responsive Bids received from four (4) contractors were found to be non -responsive. Staff has deemed the bids submitted by Bogh Engineering, Inc., and LDCo., Inc. as non -responsive because the contractors are self -performing less than 50% of the contract work. The construction contract, specifically Section 3-2 Self Performance of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, requires that the contractor self -perform at least 50% of the contract work. Additionally, LDCo., Inc. did not provide a signed Addendum No. 1 with their bid. Spec Construction Co., Inc. provided a bid containing an incomplete Subcontractor's List, resulting in staff being unable to verify the percentage of work being self -performed by the contractor, and is therefore non -responsive. The bid submitted by Horizon Construction Company International, Inc. has been deemed as non -responsive because they did not provide bid prices for three (3) bid items. In the construction contract, Instruction to Bidders, 2. Proposal, Item a., states that "Any bid item left blank in the Electronic Schedule of Prices in PlanetBids will deem the entire bid unresponsive and the bid will be disqualified." Staff has completed its analysis of the submitted bids and found that Act 1 Construction, Inc. of Norco, California to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Act 1 Construction, Inc. has public contracting experience and has successfully completed similar projects for various public agencies in Southern California. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $3,400,000.00. The project specifications allow for 100 working days (approximately 5 months) to complete the work. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual adopted by Resolution 2020-013 on December 7, 2020. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Since July 1, 2008, the RCA has required that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90-days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right-of-way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Maintenance only projects, such as this project, are exempt from MSHCP fees. FISCAL IMPACT: The Community Recreation Center Renovations — Phase 1, PW19- 07 is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2023- 27, and is funded with Developer Contribution, DIF-Park & Rec Improvements, DIF-Quimby, and Measure S. Adequate funds are available in the project accounts to cover the construction contract amount of $3,568,395.00, plus the 10% contingency of $356,839.50, for a total encumbrance of $3,925,234.50. A portion of these appropriations was intended to cover the projected construction cost of Phase 2. To move forward with Phase 2 construction in the future, additional funds will be needed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Project Description 3. Project Location Map CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT for COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER RENOVATIONS - PHASE 1 PROJECT NO. PW19-07 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 27th day of September, 2022 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Act 1 Construction, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: That City and Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER RENOVATIONS - PHASE 1, PROJECT NO. PW19-07, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER RENOVATIONS - PHASE 1, PROJECT NO. PW19-07. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 990 Park Center Drive, Suite E Vista, CA 92081 (760) 734-1113 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER RENOVATIONS - PHASE 1, PROJECT NO. PW19-07. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER RENOVATIONS - PHASE 1, PROJECT NO. PW19-07 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by City. 3. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE The City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: THREE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY-EIGHT THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($3,568,395.00), the total amount of the base bid. Contractor agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed One Hundred (100) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by City. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by City. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS a. Lump Sum Bid Schedule: Before submittal of the first payment request, the Contractor shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the Contractor's payment requests. b. Unit Price Bid Schedule: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within 30 days after submission of a payment request to the City, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to 95% of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the 30th day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made 60 days after acceptance of final payment and the Contractor filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the City on forms provided by the City. C. Payment for Work Performed: Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. d. Payment of Interest: Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES / EXTENSION OF TIME a. Liquidated Damages: In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor agrees to forfeit and pay to City the sum of $1,000 per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to Contractor. b. Extension of Time: Contractor will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including delays caused by City. Within ten calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, Contractor shall give written notice to City. Within 30 calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, Contractor shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to City. Contractor's failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute Contractor's waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against City. 8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the Contractor has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the City related to the payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or subcontractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1720.9, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. This project, work, or service will 10. 11 12. 13. 14. be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this contract. Under no circumstances will any construction activity occur after April 24, 2023. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included), and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. The Contractor shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the City for any and all costs incurred by the City as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The City shall deduct such costs from progress payments or final payments due to the Contractor. GRATUITIES Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to City's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the City who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. Contractor further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the Contractor has been employed by the City within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to City. 16. 17. im 19. 20. 21 BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. PROHIBITED INTEREST No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the Contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. ADA REQUIREMENTS By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the City addressed as follows: Mailing and Delivery Address: Patrick A. Thomas, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 23. INSURANCE The Contractor shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the Contract, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Minimum Scope of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. Worker's' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Contract, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. Course of Construction insurance form providing coverage for "all risks' of loss. Minimum Limits of Insurance: The Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: Two Million Dollars $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury, and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2. Automobile Liability: One Million Dollars $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Course of Construction: Completed value of the project. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions: Any deductibles or self-insurance retentions shall not exceed Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars $25,000. Other Insurance Provisions: The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: The City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects to liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. 2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3. Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. 4. The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be cancelled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than 30 days prior to the cancellation effective date. 6. If insurance coverage is cancelled or reduced in coverage or in limits, the Contractor shall within two business days of notice from the insurer, phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 7. Course of construction policies shall contain the following provisions: (1) Additional insured shall be named as loss payee, and (2) The insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against entity. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-, VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. Verification of Coverage: Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. Subcontractors: Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. 24. RECOVERED MATERIALS AND SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT Contractor agrees to comply with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended (42 U.S.C. 6962), including but not limited to the regulatory provisions of 40 CFR Part 247, and Executive Order 12873, as they apply to the procurement of the items designated in Subpart B of 40 CFR Part 247. 25. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT Contractor shall not procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or enter into a contract to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that use covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115- 232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation, or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities. Covered equipment also includes video surveillance and telecommunications equipment or services provided by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, Dahua Technology Company, any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities, and any entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. 26. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, State and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time the Contractor performs pursuant to the Contract Documents, and shall comply with all grant or funding terms and conditions applicable to the Contract and/or the work. 27. CLAIM DISPUTE RESOLUTION In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work, but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute' and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters. All claims arising out of or related to the Contract or this project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must present a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to prosecuting any claim against the City. The filing or prosecution of a claim in compliance with Section 9204 and/or Article 1.5 (if applicable) does not in any way obviate the need to timely present a claim under the Government Claims Act, or in any toll the expiration of any limitations period for the timely presentation of a claim under the Government Claims Act. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: September 8, 2022 CONTRACTOR: Act 1 Construction, Inc. 444 Sixth St. Norco, CA 92860 951-735-1184 don@acticonst.com ey:� ,-ram Don Trenholm Print or type NAME President Print or type NAME VP/Sec Print or type TITLE* (*Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA 0 Matt Rahn, Mayor CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On September 08, 2022 before me, Cheri L. Bower, Notary Public Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Don Trenholm & Tiffany Trenholm----------------------------------------------- Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) W/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that 3e(they executed the same in I*X*ter/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by)t21~their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. CHERI L. BOWER Notary Public • California Riverside County b Commission # 2300617 My Comm. Expires Aug g, 2023 I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature�ZZ,//�fLL1N Signature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Contract Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Don Trenholm ® Corporate Officer — Title(s): President ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Act 1 Construction: Inc. Number of Pages: Signer's Name: Tiffany Trenholm ® Corporate Officer — Title(s): VP/Sec ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Act 1 Construction, Inc. ©2015 National Notary Association • www.NationaiNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 f ANk The Heart aF Sauthern Cali{arnia Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) RENOVATIONS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. Projects include: expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. The project will be delivered in phases. Phase 1 includes full repair, maintenance, and updating to current standards. Phases2 and 3 include expansion and improvements throughout the facility. Benefit: This project will create a safe, engaging place for teens to participate in individual and group social, recreational, physical, and educational activities, while also providing necessary renovations to the CRC facility. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Phase 1 design is complete. Phase 1 construction and Phase 2 design is scheduled for FY 2021-22. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.730 / PW19-07 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2021-22 Adjusted 2022-23 Adopted Budget 2023-24 2024-25 Projected Projected 2025-26 2026-27 Projected Projected Total Project Cost Administration 66,528 200,235 134,000 50,000 450,763 Construction 1,497,491 4,790,576 1,821,809 8,109,876 Construction Engineering 121,681 312,974 152,495 587,150 Design & Environmental 144,041 495,401 346,001 985,443 Information Technology 575,000 575,000 Total Expenditures 210,569 2,314,808 6,158,551 2,024,304 10,708,232 Source of Funds: Developer Contribution 750,000 750,000 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 200,000 806,048 515,160 400,000 1,921,208 DIF-Quimby 160,000 1,193,952 1,000,000 1,096,640 3,450,592 Measure S 150,000 15,377 3,893,391 527,664 4,586,432 Total Funding i 510,000 2,015,377 6,158,551 2,024,304 10,708,232 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution reflects the extraordinary community benefit payment from the Heirloom Farms development. 132 4TiiLcITY OF -0 TEMECULA Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations - Project Location ' UM 'I MIS 4a u, .k r.. I prt a •h Ir' 188.1 0 94.04 188.1 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be WGS 1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend Parcels City of Temecula Boundary Streets <all other values> COLLECTOR LIMITED SECONDARY ARTERIAL LOCAL MAJOR ARTERIAL MODIFIED SECONDARY ARTERI, PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL PRIVATE RURAL HIGHWAY SECONDARY ARTERIAL URBAN ARTERIAL Creeks ❑ Cities Notes 30875 RANCHO VISTA ROAD TEMECULA CA 92592 Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Principal Civil Engineer William Becerra, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On September 14, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Marin Concrete Construction, Inc., in the amount of $159,267.30 and authorized the City Manager to approve construction change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $39,816.83. On November 23, 2021, the City Council increased the contingency by $70,000.00 for a total authorization of $269,084.13 to complete Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek). The Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek) Project provided for construction of new sidewalks along the north side of Fifth Street, rolled curb, full -width street pavement grind and overlay, centerline ribbon gutter, signing and striping, street lighting, landscaping and irrigation, and bollards for the road terminus at Murrieta Creek. The Project improvements were designed in accordance with the Old Town Specific Plan. Marin Concrete Construction, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All work will be warranted for a period of one year from December 7, 2021, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements. The retention for this project was released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the project and filing and recording the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Marin Concrete Construction, Inc., 541 Placentia Avenue, Perris, CA 92571, to perform the following work of improvement: Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on September 27, 2022. That upon said contract Harco National Insurance Company, 2400 E. Katella Ave., Ste. 250, Anaheim, CA 92806, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 6. The location of said property is: Fifth Street in the City of Temecula Dated at Temecula, California, this 27t" day of September, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of September, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk 2021-231 SURETY BOND REVIEW FORM The attached surety bond(s) have been reviewed in the following amount(s): PROJECT: Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), Project No. PW20-02 CONTRACTOR: Marin Concrete Construction, Inc. SURETY BOND TYPE BOND NUMBER BOND AMOUNT Harco National Insurance Company Maintenance 0806190 $230,332.20 The surety company is ® is not ❑ an admitted company in the State of California: ■ Financial Strength Rating: A- XI ■ A.M. Best #: 000960 ■ NAIC #: 26433 ■ CA Company ID #: 3711-9 Insurance Verified By: 4/20/2022 Risk Management Division Date Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Date NOTES: CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 0806190 MAINTENANCE BOND for SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS (FIFTH STREET FROM FRONT STREET TO MURRIETA CREEK) PROJECT NO. PW20-02 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT Merin Concrete Construction, Inc., 541 Placentia Avenue, Perris, CA 92571 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a Corporation (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) (hereinafter called "Principal"), and Harco National Insurance Company, 2400 E. Katella Ave., Suite 250, Anaheim, CA 92806 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of Two Hundred Thirty Thousand Three Hundred • DOLLARS AND Twenty CENTS ($ 230,332.20 ) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. 'Thirty -Two THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 14th day of September . 20 21 , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS (FIFTH STREET FROM FRONT STREET TO MURRIETA CREEK), PROJECT NO. PW20-02. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 17th day of December 20 21 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 14th day of April , 20 22 (Seal) - SUR : Harm National Ins rance Company By: Shaunna Rozeile Ostrom (Name) Attorney -In -Fact APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL: Mann Concrete Constructlon, Inc By: 0 (Title)' By: SVRH C (Name) (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or valid!ty of that document. State of California County of onsen. ) On 4/14/2022 before me, Melissa Ann Vaccaro. Nolary Public (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Shaunna Rozelle Ostrom who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) !stare subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. MELISSA ANN VACCARO WITNESS my hand and official seal. COMM.#2241G0a Nois, Publlccai oraa ¢ Q-§4',C.rn.. ORANGECOURV EvInu May 12.2022 Signature (Seal) Melissa Ann Vacave POWER OF ATTORNEY HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY Bond No. 0806190 INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY Member companies of IAT Insurance Group, Headquartered: 4200 Six Forks Rd, Suite 1400, Raleigh, NC 27609 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois, and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, and having their principal offices located respectively in the cities of Rolling Meadows, Illinois and Newark, New Jersey, do hereby constitute and appoint BEN WOLFE, MICHAEL D. STONG, CHELSEA ARNOLD, BEN STONG, DWIGHT REILLY, DANIEL HUCKABAY, ARTURO AYALA, FRANK MORONES, SHAUNNA ROZELLE OSTROM, R. NAPPI Orange, CA their true and lawful attomey(s)4n-fact to execute, seal and deliver for and on its behaif as surety, any and aii bonds and undertakings, contracts of indemnity and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, which are or may be allowed, required or permitted by law, statute, rule, regulation, contract or otherwise, and the execution of such instrument(s) in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon the said HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if the same had been duly executed and acknowledged by their regularly elected officers at their principal offices. This Power of Attorney is executed, and may be revoked, pursuant to and by authority of the By -Laws of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY and is granted under and by authority of the following resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly held on the 13th day of December, 2018 and by the Board of Directors of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting heid on the 13th day of December, 2018. "RESOLVED, that (1) the Chief Executive Officer, President, Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President, Vice President, or Secretary of the Corporation shall have the power to appoint, and to revoke the appointments of, Attorneys -In -Fact or agents with power and authority as defined or limited in their respective powers of attorney, and to execute on behaif of the Corporation and affix the Corporation's seal thereto, bonds, undertakings, recognizances, contracts of indemnity and other written obiigations in the nature thereof or related thereto; and (2) any such Officers of the Corporation may appoint and revoke the appointments of joint -control custodians, agents for acceptance of process, and Attomeys-in-fact with authority to execute waivers and consents on behalf of the Corporation; and (3) the signature of any such Officer of the Corporation and the Corporation's seal may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certification given for the execution of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, contract of indemnity or other written obiigation in the nature thereof or related thereto, such signature and seals when so used whether heretofore or hereafter, being hereby adopted by the Corporation as the original signature of such officer and the original seal of the Corporation, to be valid and binding upon the Corporation with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." iN WITNESS WHEREOF, HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY have each executed and attested these presents on this 31st day of December, 2021 ,,,.l*,., '" 9, X/,�. STATE OF NEW JERSEY STATE OF ILLINOIS ,+�cr•OR j i s County of Essex County of Cook Z s1Fau �' o _ z: SEAS. r I9fl4 ,;rea % O i t 98a tEb' Kenneth Chapman +5►� Executive Vice President, Harco National Insurance Company and International Fidelity Insurance Company On this 31st day of December, 2021 , before me came the individual who executed the preceding instrument, to me personally known, and, being by me duly swom, said he is the therein described and authorized officer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY; that the seals affixed to said instrument are the Corporate Seals of said Companies; that the said Corporate Seals and his signature were duly affixed by order of the Boards of Directors of said Companies. £ A0qG�''. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand affixed my Official Seal, at the City of Newark, `dj OTAgy^g`fit: New Jersey the day and year first above written. cu •.�'Y JEA . Shirelle A. Outley a Notary Pubiic of New Jersey My Commission Expires April4,-2023 CERTIFICATION 1, the undersigned officer of HARCO NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and INTERNATIONAL FIDELITY INSURANCE COMPANY do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy. of the Power of Attorney and affidavit, and the copy of the Sections of the By -Laws of said Companies as set forth in said Power of Attorney, with the originals: on file. in the home office of said companies, and that the same are correct transcripts thereof, and of the whole of the said originals, and that-1 skid Pow r-of Attorney has not been revoked and is now in full force and effect. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereuntoaset my hand onlhis day, April A00835 - 14th, 2022 Irene Martins, Assistant Secretary CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CRIL CODE § 1 fW A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certfcate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of a iforvnl�a,,� ) County o 1ti1 ✓� ) /' 11 On Nn,l �� ��aa before me, C tty� VV1rQrtt —7 , Date TT � Here insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared a(L() Name(s) of Signer(e) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the pemon(s) whose name(e) Ware subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/ker/their authorized capacity(�es), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person ft or the entity upon behalf of which the person(* acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. .„ c M<TI9Civorma RiEz WITNESS my rid a official seal. l/� e r r F ac County C . n CZZ9 <)0 My Conn E.pvalJ �24. 2 Signature ' ature of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: 1 Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — Limited _ General Individual Attorney in Fact Trustee Guardian or Conservator Other: Signer is Representing: Signer's Name: Corporate Officer — Title(s): '.7 Partner — ❑ Limited 11 General Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator Fi (Bhec Signer is Representing: @2014 National Notary Association • www.NationaiNotary.org • 1-500-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item fi5907 2021-231 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS (FIFTH STREET FROM FRONT STREET TO MURRIETA CREEK) PROJECT NO. PW20-02 This is to certify that MARIN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS (FIFTH STREET FROM FRONT STREET TO MURRIETA CREEK), PROJECT NO. PW20-02, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS : FIFTH ST. FROM FRONT ST. TO MURRIETA CREEK ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACT R: Dated: 04/ 19/2022 By: Signature IVAN MARIN - PRESIDENT Print Name and Title Item No. 9 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 13, 2022 CALL TO ORDER at 6:59 PM: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS -None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 13. Approve Action Minutes of August 23, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of August 23, 2022. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:03 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 4:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James Stewart, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 10 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Aaron Adams, Executive Director DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Resolutions Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Board") hold a public hearing relating to the proposed annexation of territory to Zone 1 of the Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2), and adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTOR 2. That the Board hold an election regarding the annexation, and adopt the resolution enitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD") was formed and subsequently $42,815,000 principal amount of bonds were issued in 2017 by the Authority for the CFD to finance various public facilities required for the development of the property in the CFD. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of an annual special tax levied on property in the CFD. The Authority has received a Petition (Including Waivers) (the "Petition") from Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer") requesting that the Authority, among other matters, annex property identified in the Petition to Zone 1 of the CFD. Furthermore, the Developer would like the Authority to issue special tax bonds for the CFD (the "Bonds"), payable from special taxes levied on property in the CFD and in the property being annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD on a parity with the bonds issued in 2017, to provide funds to finance costs of improvements authorized to be financed by the CFD in excess of available 2017 bond proceeds. On August 23, 2022, the Board adopted a resolution of intention to annex territory owned by the Developer to Zone 1 of the CFD and levy special taxes on the property proposed to be annexed and set the date for a public hearing regarding the annexation for September 27, 2022. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: If, following the public hearing, no majority protest has been filed pertaining to the annexation, the Board will consider the adoption of the following resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTOR Following the adoption of the above resolution, the Secretary of the Board will tabulate the ballot cast in the special election called regarding the levy of a special tax within the territory annexed to the CFD. The Developer, as the sole owner of the land in the CFD, is the only entity entitled to vote in the election. If the results of the special election reveal that the propositions have received the affirmative vote of the Developer, the Authority is then requested to adopt the following resolution: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT The Resolution declares the subject property to be fully annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD and provides that special taxes now can be levied on the property. The Resolution directs the Secretary to record in the County Record's Office an amendment to the Notice of Special Tax Lien (previously recorded at the time the CFD was formed in 2016) that places a lien on the annexed property to secure the payment of the special taxes. The Resolution also approves a Second Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement between the Authority, for and on behalf of the CFD, and the Developer that governs the use of proceeds of the Bonds, when and if issued, to finance improvements authorized to be funded by the CFD. A prior First Amendment to the Acquisition Agreement, entered into by the Authority for the CFD and the Developer on March 9, 2022, set forth the priority for use of CFD Bond proceeds to finance improvements as follows: 1) First Priority Public Improvements: a. Butterfield Stage Road Improvements b. Rancho California Road Intersection and Transitions 2) Second Priority Public Improvements a. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements 3) Third Priority Public Improvements; in this order a. Nicolas Road from BSR to Phase 2 Boundary 1,200 feet b. Nicolas Road from Phase 2 Boundary to Westerly end of Improvements near Liefer Rd. c. Nicolas/Calle Girasol Culvert and Channel Improvements 4) Fourth Priority Public Improvements a. Winchester Road/Nicolas Road Intersection Improvements It is expected that staff will present a Resolution approving the issuance of the Bonds and related Bond documents at the October 25th Authority Board meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All costs associated with the annexation and the issuance of the Bonds will be paid for from amounts advanced by the Developer and/or out of the proceeds of the Bonds when and if they are issued. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolutions (2) 2. Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien 3. Second Amendment to Acquisition Agreement RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX THEREIN AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF SPECIAL TAX TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On August 23, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), adopted its Resolution No. TPFA 2022-12 (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to annex territory to Zone 1 of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"), pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. A copy of the Resolution of Intention, incorporating a description and map of the proposed boundaries of the territory to be annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD and stating the facilities to be financed by the CFD and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied on property in the CFD to pay for the facilities and/or the principal and interest on bonds issued for the CFD, is on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are fully incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein. Section 3. On the date hereof, the Board of Directors of the Authority held a noticed public hearing as required by the Act and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed annexation of territory to Zone 1 of the CFD, and at the hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the annexation of territory to Zone 1 of the CFD and the levy of special taxes within the area proposed to be annexed were heard and a full and fair hearing was held. Section 4. Prior to the closing of the public hearing, no written or oral protests had been made against the proposed annexation of territory to the CFD by (i) any registered voter residing in the existing territory of the CFD, or (ii) any registered voter residing in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD, or (iii) any of the owners of land in the existing territory of the CFD, or (iv) any of the owners of land in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD. Section 5. All prior proceedings taken by the Board of Directors of the Authority with respect to the CFD and the proposed annexation of territory thereto have been duly considered and are hereby determined to be valid and in conformity with the Act, and the CFD has been validly established pursuant to the Act. Section 6. The boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the CFD, as described on the Proposed Annexation No. 1 Boundary Map on file with the Secretary and heretofore recorded on August 25, 2022 at 12:35 p.m. in the Riverside County Recorder's Office in Book 89 at page 52 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities District (Document No. 2022-0372096), are hereby finally approved, and said territory is hereby ordered annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD, subject to voter approval of the levy of the special taxes therein as hereinafter provided. Section 7. Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the proposition of the levy of the special tax within the territory to be annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD shall be submitted to the qualified elector of the area to be annexed to the CFD at an election called therefor as hereinafter provided. Section 8. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD for each of the 90 days preceding the close of the public hearing heretofore conducted and concluded by the Board of Directors of the Authority for the purposes of these annexation proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326 of the Act, the Board of Directors of the Authority finds that the sole qualified elector for purposes of the annexation election is the owner of all of the land within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD and that the vote shall be by said landowner, having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD. Section 9. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described in Section 7 above, which election shall be held in the Temecula City Council chambers immediately following adoption of this Resolution. The Secretary is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the Secretary has on file a copy of the Resolution of Intention, a copy of the map of the proposed boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the CFD, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to determine the boundaries of the territory to be annexed to the CFD. The voted ballot shall be returned to the Secretary no later than immediately following the adoption of this Resolution; and when the sole qualified elector has voted the election shall be closed. Section 10. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Act, the election shall be conducted by hand - delivered ballot pursuant to the California Elections Code. The Board of Directors of the Authority acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered to the sole qualified elector of the territory to be annexed to the CFD a ballot in the form set forth in Exhibit "A" hereto. The ballot indicated the number of votes to be voted by the landowner. The ballot was accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. The envelope to be used to return the ballot was enclosed with the ballot, had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration pursuant to clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the canvassing board. Section 11. The Secretary shall accept the ballot of the qualified elector in the Temecula City Council chambers upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether the ballot is personally delivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available a ballot which may be marked at said location on the election day by the qualified elector. Section 12. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby further finds that the provisions of Section 53326 of the Act requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of this Resolution to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified elector of the territory to be annexed to the CFD. The ballot to be executed by the sole qualified elector of the area to be annexed to the CFD contains a waiver of any time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and a waiver of any requirement for ballot measure analysis and arguments in connection with the election. Accordingly, the Board of Directors of the Authority finds and determines that to the extent that the qualified elector submits its ballot, the qualified elector will have been fully apprised of and will have agreed to the shortened time for the election and waiver of ballot measure analysis and arguments, and will have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. The Board of Directors of the Authority also finds and determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of September, 2022. Matt Rahn, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) OFFICIAL BALLOT ANNEXATION ELECTION (September 27, 2022) This ballot is for the special, landowner election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed postage paid envelope to the office of the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority no later than immediately after adoption of the resolution of the Board of Directors of the Authority calling said election, either by mail or in person. To vote, mark a cross (X) in the voting line after the word "YES" or after the word "NO." All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority and obtain another. BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Temecula Public Financing Authority, by and for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16- 01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), be YES: authorized to levy special taxes within the territory being annexed to Zone 1 of the District pursuant to and as NO: described in Resolution No. TPFA-2022-12, adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on August 23, 2022? By execution in the space provided below, you also confirm your waiver of any time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for notice of election and analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the California Government Code. Number of Votes: 32 Property Owned by Property Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Nos. Owner: 964-640-015 and 964-640-016 A-1 Property Owner: Woodside 055, LP, a California limited partnership By: WDS GP, Inc. a California corporation, its general partner In Name: Title: A-2 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ANNEXATION ELECTION, DETERMINING VALIDITY OF PRIOR PROCEEDINGS, DIRECTING RECORDING OF AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN AND APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. In proceedings conducted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), the Board of Directors of the Authority has adopted a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Annexation of Territory to Zone 1 of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Therein and Submitting Levy of Special Tax to the Qualified Elector" (the "Resolution of Annexation"), which called for a special election of the sole landowner elector in the territory of land proposed to be annexed to Zone 1 of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"). Section 2. Pursuant to the terms of the Resolution of Annexation, which is by this reference incorporated herein, the special election has been held and the Secretary has filed a Canvass and Statement of Result of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and the Board of Directors of the Authority has reviewed the canvass and hereby approves it. Section 3. The issue presented at the special election was the levy of a special tax within the territory annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD, to be levied in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of special tax for the CFD heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of the Authority, all as described in Resolution No. TPFA 2022-12, entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Intention to Annex Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein," adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority on August 23, 2022. Section 4. Pursuant to the Canvass on file with the Secretary, the issue presented at the special election was approved by the sole owner of the territory annexed to the CFD at the special election. Section 5. Pursuant to the voter approval, the annexed territory is hereby declared to be fully annexed to and part of Zone 1 of the CFD and the Board of Directors of the Authority may levy special taxes therein as heretofore provided in these proceedings. Section 6. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by the Board of Directors of the Authority with respect to the CFD and the territory annexed thereto were valid and in conformity with the Act. Section 7. Within 15 days of the date of adoption hereof, the Secretary shall execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, a First Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien, in the form provided by Bond Counsel and otherwise as required by Section 3117.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Section 8. As a consequence of the annexation of territory to the CFD, and the increase in the taxing capacity of the CFD, the Authority expects to consider the issuance of additional special tax bonds for the CFD. The Second Amendment to Acquisition Agreement (the "Second Amendment") related to the use of proceeds of special tax bonds that may be issued by the Authority for the CFD to acquire certain of the facilities authorized to be funded by the CFD, between the Authority and Woodside 05S, LP, in the form presented to the Board of Directors at this meeting, is hereby approved. The Executive Director is hereby authorized, for the Authority on behalf of the CFD, to execute and deliver the Second Amendment in said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as are deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate by the Executive Director upon consultation with the Authority's General Counsel and Bond Counsel, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Executive Director of the Second Amendment. It is expressly acknowledged that the approval of the Second Amendment does not obligate the Authority to issue any additional special tax bonds for the CFD. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of September, 2022. Matt Rahn, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of September, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) ANNEXATION ELECTION CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF ELECTION I hereby certify that on this date, I canvassed the returns of the election held on this date in the territory annexed to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) which election is designated as the Annexation Election, and the total number of ballots cast in the territory to be annexed and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct: Qualified Landowner Votes Votes Cast YES NO Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 Annexation Election, September 27, 2022. 32 32 BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Temecula Public Financing Authority, by and for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), be authorized to levy special taxes within the territory being annexed to Zone 1 of the District pursuant to and as described in Resolution No. TPFA 2022-12 adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on August 23, 2022? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 27th day of September, 2022. TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Randi Johl, Secretary A-1 Quint & Thimmig LLP 8/29/22 9/9/22 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 (THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY) AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION (GOVT. CODE 27361.1) 20009.22:J 18474 AMENDMENT TO NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of California and Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code, the undersigned Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax is hereby imposed by the Authority on the property described herein. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds issued and to be issued for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), the proceeds of which were used to prepay certain special taxes and are being and are to be used to finance a portion of the costs of certain public improvements, as well as pay for certain public services and administrative expenses, as described in, and said special tax is to be levied according to the rate and method of apportionment of special tax set forth in, that certain Notice of Special Tax Lien heretofore recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California on May 4, 2016 at the hour of 3:14 p.m. as Document No. 2016- 0180604 (the "Original Notice"), to which recorded Original Notice reference is hereby made and the provisions of which are by this referenced incorporated herein. This Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien amends the Original Notice to add to the territory of Zone 1 of the District the lands set forth in that certain map entitled "Proposed Annexation No. 1 Boundary Map of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2), City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California," heretofore recorded on August 25, 2022 at 12:35 p.m., in Book 89 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 52 (Document No. 2022-0372096) in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside, State of California. The assessor's tax parcel numbers of all parcels or any portion thereof which are included in this Amendment to Notice of Special Tax Lien, together with the name of the owner thereof, as they appear on the latest secured assessment roll as of the date of recording hereof or as are otherwise known to the Authority are as set forth in Exhibit A hereto and by this referenced made a part hereof. -1- For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Treasurer of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, telephone number (951) 693-3945. Dated: 12022. 91 Randi Johl, Secretary, Temecula Public Financing Authority -2- EXHIBIT A ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNER OF LAND WITHIN TERRITORY OF ANNEXATION TO ZONE 1 OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) Assessor's Parcel Nos. Names of Property Owner 964-640-015 Woodside 05S, LP 964-640-016 1250 Corona Pointe, Suite 500 Corona, CA 92879 A-1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT DATED AS OF MARCH 1, 2017 BY AND BETWEEN THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND WOODSIDE 055, LP THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (the "Second Amendment") is made and entered into as of September 27, 2022, by and between (i) the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a joint exercise of powers authority organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "Authority"), for and on behalf of the Authority's Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "2005 CFD") and the Authority's Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "2016 CFD"), and (ii) Woodside 055, LP ("Woodside"), as successor to Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company under the Acquisition Agreement referenced below. In consideration of the mutual agreements set forth herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS. This Second Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and for the following purposes, each of which are acknowledged as true and correct by the parties: A. The Authority established Community Facilities District 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) and Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and issued bonds to fund the public improvements (the "Facilities") as described in Section 3.03 and Exhibit D of that certain Acquisition Agreement by and between the Temecula Public Financing Authority and Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC dated as of March 1, 2017 ("Acquisition Agreement"). Woodside is the successor to the rights and obligations of Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC under the Acquisition Agreement. B. The Authority and Woodside entered into a First Amendment to Acquisition Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017 by and between the Temecula Public Financing Authority and Woodside 055, LP as of March 9, 2022 (the "First Amendment"). C. The City has conducted proceedings to annex certain property owned by Woodside into Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "2016 CFD") and, at the request of Woodside, now is considering the issuance of additional special tax bonds of the Authority for the 2016 CFD (the "2022 Special Tax Bonds") in order to provide additional funds for the acquisition of Facilities pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment. D. It is expected that the principal amount of the 2022 Special Tax Bonds will reflect, in part, the additional special tax revenue of the 2016 CFD generated by the expected build out of Woodside's annexed property, and that proceeds of the 2022 Special Tax Bonds, when and if issued by the Authority, will be available to fund costs of Facilities in accordance with the priorities established in the Acquisition Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment. #211556 v1 9103.34 2. ACKNOWLEDGMENT. The Authority and Woodside acknowledge and agree that the Authority is proceeding with actions necessary for the issuance of the 2022 Special Tax Bonds, but the Authority is not obligated to issue the 2022 Special Tax Bonds. When and if the 2022 Special Tax Bonds are issued, the Authority will reserve proceeds of the 2022 Special Tax Bonds to be used, together with any amounts available in an Improvement Fund (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement), to finance Facilities in accordance with the priorities established in the Acquisition Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment. 3. GENERAL. A. In entering into this Second Amendment, the parties represent that they have relied upon the legal advice of their attorneys, who are the attorneys of their own choice, and that these terms are fully undertaken and voluntary accepted by them. The parties further represent that they have no questions with regard to the legal import of any term, work phrase, or portion of this Second Amendment, or the Second Amendment in its entirety, and accept the terms of this Second Amendment as written. B. The parties on behalf of themselves and their successors and assigns, acknowledge and agree that this Second Amendment is valid, lawful, and biding upon the each of the respective parties and their successors and assigns. C. This Second Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and this Second Amendment supersedes all previous negotiations, discussion, and agreement between the parties to this Second Amendment with respect to its terms. D. Except for the terms specifically set forth in this Second Amendment with respect to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, all other terms and conditions of the Acquisition Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect and all capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Acquisition Agreement. E. The recitals set forth in Section 1 of this Second Amendment are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference. F. Woodside warrants and represents to the Authority that it has obtained all required third -party approvals required for its approval of this Second Amendment. [Signature Page Follows] #211556 vl 9103.34 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and entered into this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above written. TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Aaron Adams, Executive Director ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel WOODSIDE 05S, LP, a California limited partnership By: WDS GP, Inc., a California corporation, its General Partner By: Name: Its: #211556 vl 9103.34 3 Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing, Adopt a Resolution Approving the Issuance of Not to Exceed $25,000,000 of California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Vine Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Project PREPARED BY: Haide Urias, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the issuance by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") of not to exceed $25,000,000 of the Authority's Revenue Obligations (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership (the "Borrower"); and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of educational facilities for the benefit of the Borrower. RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $25,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING OF MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING FOR THE BENEFIT OF VINE CREEK APARTMENTS AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED BACKGROUND: The Authority. The California Municipal Finance Authority (CMFA) was created on January 1, 2004, pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement to promote economic, cultural and community development, through the financing of economic development and charitable activities throughout California. To date, over 330 municipalities, including the City of Temecula, have become members of CMFA. The CMFA was formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations, and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds aimed at improving the standard of living in California. The CMFA's representatives and its Board of Directors have considerable experience in bond financings. There are no costs associated with membership in the CMFA and the City will in no way become exposed to any financial liability by reason of its membership in the CMFA. In addition, participation by the City in the CMFA will not impact the City's appropriations limits and will not constitute any type of indebtedness by the City. Outside of holding the TEFRA hearing, adopting the required resolution, no other participation or activity of the City or the City Council with respect to the issuance of the Bonds will be required. The Borrower. Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership (the 'Borrower") a partnership of which Pacific West Communities, Inc. (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner. Pacific West Communities, Inc. ("PWC") was formed as a real estate development and financing firm, specializing in the construction and rehabilitation of affordable workforce housing throughout the western United States. With a particular emphasis on the use of the affordable housing tax credits, PWC and its related companies develop multi- family and senior citizen housing in the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Oregon, Montana, Idaho, Nevada, Colorado, Washington, and Wyoming. Currently PWC owns and operates approximately 110 developments with over 6,000 units of affordable housing. The Prot. Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership (the 'Borrower") a partnership of which Pacific West Communities, Inc. (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the "CMFA") serve as the municipal issuer of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement and equipping of a multifamily rental housing project to be located at the northwest corner of Main Street and Pujol Street (APNs 922-053-047-6, 922-053-021-2 and 922-053-048-7), Temecula, California (the "Project"). For all or a portion of the Bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of Temecula must conduct a public hearing (the "TEFRA Hearing") providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Vine Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Project ("Project"). Prior to such TEFRA Hearing, reasonable notice must be provided to the members of the community. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, an "applicable elected representative" of the governmental unit hosting the Project must provide its approval of the issuance of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. The site for the proposed project, Vine Creek Apartments, is approximately 2.27 acres of land located on the northwest corner of Main Street and Pujol Street in the City of Temecula. The proposed development will be a 60-unit rental new construction project. With a mix of seven (7) one -bedroom units, 32 two -bedroom units, and 21 three -bedroom units, Vine Creek Apartments will provide affordable housing for families earning up to 60% of the area median income for Riverside County. The project will include two residential buildings. The units will be newly constructed three-story garden style apartments. Exterior design elements are incorporated with the design style of Andalusian Spanish Architecture to conform to the Temecula Old Town Specific Plan. Within the units, residents will enjoy standard features including refrigerators, exhaust fans, dishwashers, disposals, and ranges with ovens. All units feature an outdoor balcony or patio with storage space. Project amenities are distributed throughout the site, providing community space in both residential buildings. Amenities include a large community room with kitchen, fitness center, centrally located pool with pool deck, and outdoor children's playground. This financing will create 59 units of affordable housing for low-income households in the City of Temecula for the next 55 years. FISCAL IMPACT: The Bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for the Project or the repayment of the Bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the Bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the Bonds are not obligations of the City or the State of California but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower. The Board of Directors of the California Foundation for Stronger Communities, a California non- profit public benefit corporation (the "Foundation"), acts as the Board of Directors for the CMFA. Through its conduit issuance activities, the CMFA shares a portion of the issuance fees it receives with its member communities and donates a portion of these issuance fees to the Foundation for the support of local charities. With respect to the City of Temecula, it is expected that a portion of the issuance fee attributable to the City will be granted by the CMFA to the general fund of the City. Such grant may be used for any lawful purpose of the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. City Council Resolution No. 19-45, California Association for Local Economic Development Membership 3. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $25,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING OF MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING FOR THE BENEFIT OF VINE CREEK APARTMENTS AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED WHEREAS, Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership (the "Borrower") a partnership of which Pacific West Communities, Inc. (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner, has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the "Authority") adopt a plan of financing and providing for the issuance of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, and at no time to exceed $25,000,000 in aggregate principal amount (the 'Bonds"), to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement and equipping of a multifamily rental housing project to be located at the northwest corner of Main Street and Pujol Street (APNs 922-053-047-6, 922-053-021-2 and 922-053-048-7), Temecula, California (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority must be approved by the City of Temecula (the "City") because the Project is located within the territorial limits of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City (the "City Council") is the elected legislative body of the City and is one of the "applicable elected representatives" required to approve the issuance of the Bonds under Section 147(f) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Authority has requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of Section 4 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the "Agreement"), among certain local agencies, including the City; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Bonds, and now desires to approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The foregoing resolutions are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this resolution constitutes approval of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, for the purposes of (a) Section 147(f) of the Code by the applicable elected representative of the governmental unit having jurisdiction over the area in which the Project is located, in accordance with said Section 147(f) and (b) Section 4 of the Agreement. Section 3. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the Bonds. Section 4. The adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to: 1. Provide any financing to acquire or construct the Project or any refinancing of the Project. 2. Approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, installation, or operation of the Project. 3. Make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority. 4. Take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein. Section 5. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they deem necessary or advisable in order to carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution and the financing transaction approved hereby. Section 6. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. N PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of September, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 19-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EXECUTION OF AN ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT RELATING TO ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITY IN THE AUTHORITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, California (the "City") is a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City, upon authorization of the City Council (the "City Coucil"), may pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 6500 (the "JPA Law") enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement with one or more other public agencies pursuant to which such contracting parties may jointly exercise any power common to them; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Selma, Lancaster and Eureka have entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), establishing the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") and prescribing its purposes and powers; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the City's economic development efforts, the City desires to become an associate member of the Authority; and WHEREAS, under the JPA Law and the Agreement, the Authority is a public entity separate and apart from the parties to the Agreement and the debts, liabilities and obligations of the Authority will not be the debts, liabilities or obligations of the City or the other members of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the form of associate membership agreement (the "Associate Membership Agreement") between the City and the Authority has been filed with the City, and the members of the City Council, with the aid of the City's staff, have reviewed the Associate Membership Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: Section 1. Associate Membership in the Authority. The City Council hereby approves associate membership by the City in the Authority. Section 2. Approval of Associate Membership Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the form of, and authorizes the Mayor, the City Manager or any designee of such officers, to execute the Associate Membership Agreement and authorizes the City Clerk to 1 1 attest to such signature, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the official signing the Associate Membership Agreement. Section 3. Official Action. The Mayor, the City Manger, the City Clerk and other officers and officials of the City, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary with respect to associate membership in the Authority including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents which are necessary to effectuate the purposes of this resolution. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 9�" day of July, 2019. ATTEST: Randi Jo , ity Clerk [SEAL] Michael S. Naggar, Mayor 1 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19-45 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 9 h day of July, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Rahn, Schwank, Stewart, Naggar NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Randi Johl, City Clerk 3 CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula duly and regularly held in Temecula, California, on July 9, 2019, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice. I further certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing copy with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office; that said copy is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and that said resolution has not been amended, modified, rescinded or revoked in any manner since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate and affixed the seal of the City of Temecula hereto this 9d` day of July, 2019. 42 � Randi Jo ,- ity Clerk n Notice of Public Hearin THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR22-0946 Applicant: California Municipal Finance Authority Location: Northwest corner of Main Street & Pujol Street (APNs 922-053-047-6, 922-053-021-2 and 922-053-048-7), Temecula, California Proposal: The City Council of the City of Temecula will hold a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code") with respect to a proposed plan of financing providing for the issuance by the California Municipal Finance Authority of exempt facility bonds for a qualified residential rental project pursuant to Section 142(a)(7) of the Code in one or more series issued from time to time, including bonds issued to refund such exempt facility bonds in one or more series from time to time, in an amount not to exceed $25,000,000 in aggregate principal amount (the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used to: (1) finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, improvement and equipping of Vine Creek Apartments, a multifamily rental housing project to be located at the northwest corner of Main Street & Pujol Street (APNs 922-053-047-6, 922-053-021-2 and 922- 053-048-7), Temecula, California; and (2) pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. The facilities are to be owned by Temecula Pacific Associates, a California Limited Partnership or a partnership of which Pacific West Communities, Inc. (the "Developer") or a related person to the Developer is the general partner. Environmental Action: None PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA DATE OF HEARING: September 27, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Haide Urias, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 693-3918. Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance Adopting 2022 California Fire Code PREPARED BY: Elsa Wigle, Assistant Fire Marshal Wendy Miller, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BASED ON THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, IN ITS ENTIRETY, REGULATING AND GOVERNING THE SAFEGUARD OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS ARISING FROM THE STORAGE, HANDLING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, MATERIALS AND DEVICES, AND FROM CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE OR PROPERTY IN THE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS AND PREMISES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, INCLUDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND THE COLLECTION OF FEES SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: Code adoption of the new California Fire Code, 2022 Edition as well as local amendments to the code. BACKGROUND: In accordance with the requirements of State law, and in order to maintain appropriate standards and regulations pertaining to the protection of life and property from fire and explosion, it is now necessary to incorporate within the Temecula Municipal Code, the 2022 Edition of the California Fire Code, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, inclusive of all of the inclusions and exclusions set forth in each chapter's matrix. This Code shall constitute the Fire Code of the City of Temecula. The Ordinance adopts regulations dealing with the various aspects of administration of said Fire Code including, but not limited to, its scope of application, alternative materials and methods, applicable standards, enforcement of said Code by designated officials, appeals of determinations by the Fire Chief and permit fees pursuant to said Code. The Code, together with certain amendments, additions and deletions, generally deals with all aspects of safeguarding life and property, establishes fire and panic safety -related building regulations, and specific regulations pertaining to the hazards of fire and explosion arising from the storage, handling and use of hazardous substances, materials and devices. Further, the Fire Code of the City of Temecula, together with the amendments, additions and deletions set forth in the Ordinance, establish regulations to safeguard life and property from hazardous conditions in the use or occupancy of buildings or premises within the City of Temecula. The Ordinance provides that violations of the Ordinance may be enforced pursuant to the enforcement provisions set forth in Title 1 of the Temecula Municipal Code, including the use of civil remedies. A certified copy of the entirety of the text of this ordinance, together with a copy of the 2022 California Fire Code, shall be maintained in the office of the City Clerk, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, and shall be made available for public inspection. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE BASED ON THE 2021 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, IN ITS ENTIRETY, REGULATING AND GOVERNING THE SAFEGUARD OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FROM FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS ARISING FROM THE STORAGE, HANDLING AND USE OF HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES, MATERIALS AND DEVICES, AND FROM CONDITIONS HAZARDOUS TO LIFE OR PROPERTY IN THE OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS AND PREMISES IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, INCLUDING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND DELETIONS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND THE COLLECTION OF FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 15.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code, including all provisions of all codes adopted by reference therein, is hereby repealed provided, however, that such repeal shall not affect or excuse any violation occurring prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. A new Chapter 15.16 is hereby added to Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: Chapter 15.16 FIRE CODE 15.16.010 Code adopted. The City of Temecula hereby adopts by reference the California Fire Code, 2022 Edition, as set forth in Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, except as stated in this Section or as amended below in Section 15.16.020 of this Ordinance, including all provisions and appendices B, BB, C, CC and H and all of the inclusions and exclusions set forth in each chapter's matrix, and the same shall apply to the City of Temecula. In addition, the following provisions that are excluded in the 2022 California Fire Code are hereby adopted: Chapter 1, Division II is hereby adopted, except that Sections 103.2 and 111.3 are not adopted, and Chapters 3, 25, and Sections 403.11, 503, 510.2, and 1103.2 are adopted. 15.16.020 Amendments. The following amendments, additions, and deletions are made to the California Fire Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. CHAPTER 1: SCOPE AND ADMINISTRATION Section 101.4 is added to read as follows: 101.4 Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this ordinance are hereby declared to be severable. Section 102.5 is amended to read as follows: 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Where structures are designed and constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code, the provisions of this code shall apply as follows: 1. Construction and design provisions of this code pertaining to the exterior of the structure shall apply including, but not limited to, premises identification, fire apparatus access and water supplies. Where interior or exterior systems or devices are installed, construction permits required by Section 105.7 of this code shall apply. 2. Administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of this code shall apply. 3. Automatic fire sprinkler system requirements of this code shall apply to detached accessory buildings 3,600 square feet or greater in accordance with Section 903.2. The provisions contained in Section 903.2.18 of the California Fire Code or Section R309.6 of the California Residential Code may be used for the design of the automatic fire sprinkler system for detached private garages. Section 103.4 is amended to read as follows: 103.4 Liability. Any liability against Riverside County or any officer or employee for damages resulting from the discharge of their duties shall be as provided by law. Section 104.1.1 is added to read as follows: 104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department. 1. The Fire Chief is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable State fire laws and provisions of this ordinance and to perform such duties as directed by the City Council. 2. The Fire Chief is authorized to administer, interpret and enforce this ordinance. Under the Fire Chief s direction, the Riverside County Fire Department is authorized to enforce ordinances of the City of Temecula pertaining to the following: 2.1. The prevention of fires. 2.2. The suppression or extinguishment of dangerous or hazardous fires. 2.3. The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials. 2.4. The installation and maintenance of automatic, manual and other private fire alarm systems and fire extinguishing equipment. 2.5. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes. 2.6. The maintenance of fire protection and the elimination of fire hazards on land, in buildings, structures and other property, including those under construction. 2.7. The maintenance of means of egress and occupant loads. 2.8. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of fire and unauthorized releases of hazardous materials. 3. The following persons are hereby authorized to interpret and enforce the provisions of this ordinance and to make arrests and issue citations as authorized by law: 3.1. The Unit Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 3.2. The Fire Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.3. The Riverside County Sheriff and any deputy sheriff. 3.4. The Police Chief and any police officer of any city served by the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.5. Officers of the California Highway Patrol. 3.6. Code Officers of the City of Temecula Code Enforcement Department. 3.7. Peace Officers of the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 3.8. The law enforcement officer of the Federal Bureau of Land Management. 3 Section 104.13 is added to read as follows: 104.13 Authority of the Fire Chief to close hazardous fire areas. Except upon National Forest Land, the Fire Chief is authorized to determine and announce the closure of any hazardous fire area or portion thereof. Any closure by the Fire Chief for a period of more than fifteen (15) calendar days must be approved by the City Council within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Fire Chief s original order of closure. Upon such closure, no person shall go in or be upon any hazardous fire area, except upon the public roadways and inhabited areas. During such closure, the Fire Chief shall erect and maintain at all entrances to the closed area sufficient signs giving notice of closure. This section shall not prohibit residents or owners of private property within any closed area, or their invitees, from going in or being upon their lands. This section shall not apply to any entry, in the course of duty, by a peace officer, duly authorized public officer or fire department personnel. For the purpose of this section, "hazardous fire area" shall mean public or private land that is covered with grass, grain, brush or forest and situated in a location that makes suppression difficult, resulting in great damage. Such areas are designated on Hazardous Fire Area maps filed with the office of the Fire Chief. Section 107.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 107.2 Schedule of permit fees. Fees for services and permits shall be as set forth in the City of Temecula fee schedule. Section 107.7 is added to read as follows: 107.7 Cost recovery. Fire suppression, investigation, rescue or emergency medical costs are recoverable in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 13009 and 13009.1, as may be amended from time to time. Additionally, any person who negligently, intentionally or in violation of law causes an emergency response, including, but not limited to, a traffic accident, spill of toxic or flammable fluids or chemicals is liable for the costs of securing such emergency, including those costs pursuant to Government Code Section 53150 et seq., as may be amended from time to time. Any expense incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for securing such emergency shall constitute a debt of such person and shall be collectable by Riverside County in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, express or implied. Section 111.1 is deleted and replaced with the following: 111.1 Board of appeals established. The Board of Appeals shall be the City Manager. If he or she determines an outside board is needed, he or she shall designate an outside hearing officer to hear the appeal. The Fire Chief shall be notified of any appeal and the Fire Chief or designee shall be in attendance at the appeal hearing. Depending on the subject of the appeal, specialized expertise may be solicited, at the expense of the applicant, for the purpose of providing input to the Appeals Board. 4 B. CHAPTER 2: DEFINITIONS SECTION 202 — GENERAL DEFINITIONS is amended by revising the definition of Fire Chief, as follows: FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of Riverside County or the Fire Chief s designee C. CHAPTER 3: OPEN FLAMES Section 308.1.6.3 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirely and replaced with the following: 308.1.6.3 Sky lanterns or similar devices. A person shall not release or cause to be released a sky lantern or similar device. D. CHAPTER 5: FIRE SERVICE FEATURES Section 503.2.1 is amended to read as follows: 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24-feet, exclusive of shoulders, for single family dwellings tract homes, multifamily homes, commercial, and industrial development, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13-feet 6-inches. Exception: New custom home lot driveway access shall be a minimum of 20-feet in width. Section 503.2.2 deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall be the only authority authorized to designate fire apparatus access roads and fire lanes and to modify the minimum fire lane access widths for fire or rescue operations. Section 503.2.3 Surface is amended to read as follows: Section 503.2.3 Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be of a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities such as asphalt or cement (AC). Access roads shall have a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. Section 503.2.5 is amended to read as follows: 503.2.5 Dead ends. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150-feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. The maximum length of a dead-end road or cul-de-sac shall not exceed 1320 feet, unless a second access point is provided for fire access. Section 503.6.1 is added to read as follows: 503.6.1 Automatic opener. New motorized gates shall be provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicle in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time. Exception: Gates serving individual one- and two-family dwelling parcels. Section 503.7 is added to read as follows: 503.7 Loading areas and passenger drop-off areas. On private properties, where fire apparatus access roads are utilized for loading or unloading or utilized for passenger drop- off or pick-up, an additional eight (8) feet of width shall be added to the minimum required width for the fire apparatus access road. Section 505.1 is amended to read as follows: 505.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Commercial, multi -family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Address numbers shall be maintained. EXCEPTION: Building address numbers within the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) of the Old Town Specific Plan, are permitted to be a minimum of eight (8) inches in size. Sections 507.5.7 is added to read as follows: 507.5.7 Fire hydrant size and outlets. As determined by the fire code official, fire hydrant sizes and outlets shall be based on the following: 1. Super Hydrant Standard — one (1) four (4) inch outlet and two (2) two and one half (2 1/2) inch outlet. 2. Super Hydrant Enhanced — two (2) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and one half (2 1/2) inch outlet. Section 507.5.8 is added to read as follows: 507.5.8 Fire hydrant street marker. Fire hydrant locations shall be identified by the Installation of reflective markers (blue dots). Any hydrant marker damaged or removed during the course of street construction or repair shall be immediately replaced by the contractor, developer or person responsible for removal or damage. Section 508.1 is amended to read as follows: 508.1 General. Where required by other sections of this code and in all buildings classified as high-rise buildings by the California Building Code, in buildings greater than 300,000 square feet in area and in Group I-2 occupancies having occupied floors located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, a fire command center for fire department operations shall be provided and comply with Sections 508.1.1 through 508.1.8. Section 508.1.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 508.1.1 Location and access. The fire command center shall be located adjacent to the main lobby and shall be accessible from fire department vehicular access or as approved by the fire code official. The room shall have direct access from the building exterior at the lowest level of fire department access. Section 508.1.3 is amended by adding the following: Exception: A fire command center solely required because a building is greater than 300,000 square feet in area shall be a minimum of 96 square feet (9 m2) with a minimum dimension of 8 feet (2438mm). Section 508.1.6 is amended by adding the following: Exception: A fire command center solely required because a building is greater than 300,000 square feet in area shall comply with NFPA 72 and contain the features set forth in Section 508.1.6 subsections 5, 8, 10, 12, 13 and 14. The features set forth in Section 508.1.6 subsections 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 shall be required when such building contains systems or functions related to these features. Section 508.1.8 is amended to read as follows: 508.1.8 Fire command center identification. The fire command center shall be identified by a permanent easily visible sign stating "Fire Dept. Command Center," located on the door to the fire command center. Section 509.2.1 is added to read as follows: 509.2.1 Minimum clearances. A 3-foot clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of exterior fire protection system control valves, or any other exterior fire protection system component that may require immediate access, except as otherwise required or approved. Section 509.3 is added to read as follows: 509.3 Fire sprinkler system riser room. Fire sprinkler risers shall not be obstructed in any manner. The fire system riser(s) is to be provided with eighteen (18) inch clearance to each side and to the front of the system riser. Access shall be provided by means of an exterior door with the minimum dimensions two (2) feet six (6) inches wide by six (6) feet eight (8) inches tall. The fire system riser room shall house the fire sprinkler riser(s) and main fire alarm control panel and not share with any other equipment (i.e. mechanical, electrical, etc.). The fire sprinkler riser room will be located on an accessible corner of the structure with easy access for all fire department personnel. E. CHAPTER 6: BUILDING SERVICES AND SYSTEMS Section 608.11.1.2 is amended to read as follows: Section 608.11.1.2 Manual operation. When required by the fire code official, automatic crossover valves shall be capable of manual operation. The manual valve shall be located in an approved location immediately outside of the machinery room in a secure metal box or equivalent and marked as Emergency Controls. F. CHAPTER 9: FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS Section 901.2.2 is added to read as follows: 901.2.2 As-built/Revised documents. Three (3) sets of as-built/revised drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to final of any permits. Redlines are not considered as-builts/revised plans. Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 903.2 Where required. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification. Where the Sections 903.2.1 — 903.2.21 of the California Fire Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence. In addition the following is required for existing buildings/structures: A. 1. All new tenants and new occupancies hereafter constructed, which exceeds 3,600 square feet shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 2. All existing occupancies to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds 3,600 square feet, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of use or occupancy that exceeds 3,600 square feet shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. B. Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Building Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following: 1. Detached Group U occupancies used for agriculture constructed in accordance with the California Building Code. 2. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena shade canopies that are open on all sides and used for riding only - no commercial, assembly or storage uses. 3. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade structures that are open on all sides and used to shade playground equipment, temporary storage of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking. 4 Where determined by the Fire Chief that no major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load does not pose a significant threat to firefighter safety or to other structures or property, automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted. C. One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with the California Residential Code. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobile homes, manufactured homes and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. The following exceptions in the California Fire Code shall not be allowed: a. Exception in Section 903.2.3 b. Exception in Section 903.2.11.3 Section 903.3.5.3 is added to read as follows: 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity. Section 903.4.3 is amended to read as follows: 903.4.3 Floor control valves. Approved supervised indication control valves shall be provided at the point of connection to the riser in all buildings. Valve locations will be placed in the fire sprinkler riser room on each riser. Section 904.2.2.1 is added to read as follows: 904.2.2.1 Extinguishing system monitoring requirements. All automatic fire - extinguishing systems will be required to be monitored by a fire alarm/sprinkler monitoring system. If a fire alarm/sprinkler monitoring system is not present, one will be required to be installed to provide monitoring for the automatic fire -extinguishing system. Sections 907.1.6,907.1.7 and 907.1.8 are added to read as follows: 907.1.6 Fire alarm control panel (FACP). The main fire alarm control panel shall be located in the same room as, and sharing the same access as the fire sprinkler riser. The FACP shall have a minimum 36 inches of face clearance and 6 inches side clearance from any other wall or equipment. 907.1.7 Notification appliance. New tenant spaces and new occupancy buildings shall require alarm notification appliances. For multi -tenant buildings, an alarm notification appliance shall be placed in each tenant suite. For existing buildings with new tenants an alarm notification appliance shall be required in each tenant space. For existing buildings that are not equipped with a fire alarm system or sprinkler monitoring system, new tenants or owners shall be required to install the appropriate type of fire alarm system. 907.1.8 Duct Detectors. Duct detectors located in any buildings that have a fire alarm system shall be powered from the main building fire alarm power supply. G. CHAPTER 32: HIGH PILED COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE Section 3204.2.1 is added to read as follows: 3204.2.1 Minimum requirements for client leased or occupant owned warehouses. Designs of an automatic sprinkler system for client leased or occupant owned buildings containing high pile storage shall be based on the requirements of NFPA 13. The responsible designer/consultant shall perform a survey of the building to determine commodity classification, storage configuration, building height and other information related to the development of an appropriate sprinkler system design. The designer/consultant shall also make reasonable efforts to meet with the building owner or operator to understand seasonal or customer related fluctuations to the stored commodities, storage height, and configuration. The sprinkler design shall be based on the most demanding requirements determined through the onsite survey and discussions with the building owner or operator. The technical report shall describe the basis for determining the commodity and sprinkler design selection, how the commodities will be isolated or separated, and include referenced design document(s), including NFPA 13 or the current applicable factory mutual data sheets. If a specific fire test is used as the basis of design, a copy of the fire test report shall be provided at the time of plan review. H. CHAPTER 49: REQUIREMENTS FOR WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREAS. 10 Section 4904.2.1 is added to read as follows: 4904.2.1 High Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps. In accordance with Government Code Sections 51175 through 51189, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones are designated as shown on a map titled Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, dated December 24, 2009 and retained on file at the office of the Fire Chief, which supersedes other maps previously adopted by Riverside County designating high fire hazard areas. I. APPENDICES Appendix B Table B105.2 of the California Fire Code is amended to read as follows: TABLE B105.2 REQUIRED FIRE -FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS, GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND TOWNHOUSES AUTOMATIC MINIMUM FIRE -FLOW FLOW DURATION SPRINKLER SYSTEM (gallons per minute) (hours) (Design Standard) No automatic sprinkler Value in Table B 105.1(2) Duration in Table system B 105.1(2) Section 903.3.1.1 of the 50% of the value in Table Duration in Table California Fire Code B 105.1(2)a B 105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate Section 903.3.1.2 of the 50% of the value in Table Duration in Table California Fire Code B 105.1(2)b B 105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate For SI: 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/m. a. The reduced fire -flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute. b. The reduced fire -flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute. Appendix C Section C103.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: C103.1 Hydrant spacing. Fire apparatus access roads and public streets providing required access to buildings in accordance with Section 503 of the International Fire Code shall be provided with one or more fire hydrants, as determined by Section C102.1. Where more than one fire hydrant is required, the distance between required fire hydrants shall be in accordance with Sections C103.2 and C103.3. Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections. IF J. 15.16.030 Penalties for violation. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association of persons to violate any provision of this Chapter, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this Chapter. Any person, firm, corporation or association of persons violating any provision of this Chapter or the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this Chapter, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor unless specifically designated as an infraction. Such person or entity shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this Chapter, is committed, continued, or permitted. Violations shall be punishable as provided in Chapters 1.20, 1.21, and 1.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Payment of any fine or penalty herein shall not relieve a person or entity from the responsibility for correcting the violation. K. 15.16.040 Civil Remedies Available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances." Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof and intends that the invalid portions should be severed and the balance of the Ordinance be enforced. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective upon the later of January 1, 2023, or thirty (30) days after adoption. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law. 12 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Matt Rahn, Mayor 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of September, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 14 Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance Adopting 2022 California Building Code PREPARED BY: Brian Clements, Building Official RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; AND CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE BACKGROUND: The adoption of the most current California Building and Fire Codes is important for the public health, safety, and welfare of the community. The Fire and Building Codes enforced by local jurisdictions in the State of California are reviewed, amended, and adopted by the Building Standards Commission on a three (3) year code adoption cycle. Upon the adoption and publication of the State Codes, each local jurisdiction has a period of 180 days to further modify these codes with more stringent local amendments based upon local geographical, topographical, or climatic conditions, before the State Code provisions become applicable. The ordinances propose very few local amendments. Many of the provisions in the ordinances are substantially the same as previous editions of the current Municipal Code. SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: Adoption of the 2022 Editions of the California Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Code, California Electrical Code, California Administrative Code, California Energy Code, California Green Building Standards Code, California Historical Building Code, California Existing Building Code, California Residential Code, and California Referenced Standards Code, with amendments and deletions to Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2022 EDITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; AND CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS, AND AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Sections 15.04.010 through 15.04.080 of Chapter 15.04 Construction Codes of Title 15 (Building and Construction) of the Temecula Municipal Code are hereby deleted. New Sections 15.04.010 through 15.04.080 are hereby added to Chapter 15.04 to read as follows: "15.04.010 Codes adopted. Except as hereinafter provided in this Chapter, the following codes are adopted by reference as the Building Codes of the City of Temecula: A. California Building Code, 2022 Edition, Volumes 1 and 2 (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendix C-Agricultural Buildings, and Appendix F — Rodent Proofing; B. California Historical Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 8 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); C. California Existing Building Code, 2022 Edition (Part 10 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); D. California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition (Part 3 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); E. California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition (Part 4 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); F. California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition (Part 5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendix A, B, D, H, IAPMO 31-2014 of Appendix I, and J. G. California Administrative Code, 2022 Edition (Part 1 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations); H. California Energy Code, 2022 Edition (Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), I. California Green Building Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendix A4 Residential Voluntary Measures and Appendix A5 Non Residential Voluntary Measures. J. California Reference Standards Code, 2022 Edition (Part 12 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), K. California Residential Code, 2022 Edition (Part 2.5 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including Appendix AX. A copy of each of the above codes shall be maintained in the office of City Clerk and shall be made available for public inspection while such codes are in force." 15.04.020 California Building Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Building Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 105.2 is hereby amended by modifying subsection 4 under Building, to read as follows: 4. Retaining walls that are not over three (3) feet in height unless supporting a sloped surcharge and garden walls not over four (4) feet in height, measured from the top of footing to top of wall or impounding flammable Class I, Class II or III -A liquids. B. Section 105.3 is hereby amended by adding Subsection 8 to read as follows: 8. All contractors and their subcontractors must have current and valid city business licenses. C. Section 105.5 is amended to read as follows: 105.5 Expiration: Every permit issued by the building official under the provisions of this code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 12 months or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days or if the permit is revoked. Before such work can be recommenced a new permit shall first be obtained by reinstatement of the permit and the fee therefore shall be one half the amount required for reinstating the permit for such work. A permittee may request an extension of a permit. The Building Official may grant in writing, one or more extensions of time for periods of not more than 180 days per extension. The permittee shall request an extension pursuant to this subdivision in writing and demonstrate justifiable cause for the extension. D. Section 110.3.8 is amended to read as follows: 110.3.8 Fire- and smoke -resistant penetrations. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance -rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire-resistant penetrations shall be installed and certified by a third party, state of California licensed fireproofing company and certification of compliance shall be provided for building official's final approval. E. Section 111.1 is hereby amended by adding the following: To ensure appropriate continued use of any occupied space the building official will issue a new Certificate of Occupancy upon any change of tenant at the fee rates established by resolution of the City Council. F. Section 114.4.1 is hereby added to read as follows: 114.4.1 Civil Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who shall proceed with or commence work for which a permit is required by these building and construction regulations without first having obtained such permit shall, if subsequently permitted to obtain a permit therefor, pay double the fee fixed for such work. The original permit fee shall be for issuance of the permit and the balance shall be a civil penalty. This provision shall not apply to emergency work when it shall be proved to the satisfaction of the building official that such work was urgently necessary and that it was not practical to obtain a permit before commencement of the work. In all such cases a permit must be secured as soon as it is practicable to do so, and if there is an unreasonable delay in securing the required permit, the civil penalty as provided in this section shall be charged. In no event shall such civil penalty exceed the permit fee plus five hundred dollars. The civil penalty provided in this section shall be in addition to any other fines and remedies prescribed elsewhere in this code. The payment of such fees and fine shall not relieve any person from fully complying with the requirements of these building and construction regulations in the execution of the work. Section 502.1 is hereby amended to read as follows: 502.1 Address identification. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Where required by the fire code official, address numbers shall be provided in additional approved locations to facilitate emergency response. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from the public way, a monument, pole or other sign or means shall be used to identify the structure. Commercial, multi- family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of twelve (12) 3 inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi -family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Address numbers shall be maintained. H. Section 901.2.1 is added to read as follows: 901.2.1 As-built/Revised documents. Three (3) sets of as-built/revised drawings shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to final of any permits. Redlines are not considered as-builts/revised plans. I. Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 903.2 Where required. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification. Where Sections 903.2.1 — 903.2.21 of the California Fire Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence. In addition the following is required for existing buildings/structures: A. 1. All new tenants and new occupancies hereafter constructed, which exceed 3,600 square feet shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout. 2. All existing occupancies to which additions are made, where either the addition itself or the building and the addition in total exceeds 3,600 square feet, shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. 3. Change of use or occupancy that exceeds 3,600 square feet shall have an approved automatic fire sprinkler system installed throughout therein. B. Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Building Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following: 1. Detached Group U occupancies used for agricultural Constructed in accordance with the California Building Code. 2. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena shade canopies that are open on all sides and used for riding only - no commercial, assembly or storage uses. 3. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade structures that are open on all sides and used to shade playground equipment, temporary storage of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking. 4. Where determined by the Fire Chief that no major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load does not pose a significant threat to firefighter safety or to other structures or property, automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted. C. One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with the California Residential Code. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobile homes, manufactured homes and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. The following exceptions in the California Fire Code shall not be allowed: a. Exception in Section 903.2.3 b. Exception in Section 903.2.11.3 J. Section 903.3.5.3 is added to read as follows: 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically calculated systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity. K. Section 903.4.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: 903.4.3 Floor Control Valves. Approved supervised indication control valves shall be provided at the point of connection to the riser in all buildings. Valve locations will be placed in the fire sprinkler riser room on each riser. L. Section 904.2.2.1 is added to read as follows: 904.2.2.1 Extinguishing system monitoring requirements. All automatic fire - extinguishing systems will be required to be monitored by a fire alarm/sprinkler monitoring system. If a fire alarm/sprinkler monitoring system is not present, one will be required to be installed to provide monitoring for the automatic fire - extinguishing system. M. Sections 907.1.6, 907.1.7 and 907.1.8 are added to read as follows: 907.1.6 Fire alarm control panel (FACP). The main fire alarm control panel shall be located in the same room as, and sharing the same access as the fire sprinkler riser. The FACP shall have a minimum 36 inches of face clearance and 6 inches side clearance from any other wall or equipment. 5 907.1.7 Notification appliance. New tenant spaces and new occupancy buildings shall require alarm notification appliances. For multi -tenant buildings, an alarm notification appliance shall be placed in each tenant suite. For existing buildings with new tenants an alarm notification appliance shall be required in each tenant space. For existing buildings that are not equipped with a fire alarm system or sprinkler monitoring system, new tenants or owners shall be required to install the appropriate type of fire alarm system. 907.1.8 Duct Detectors. Duct detectors located in any buildings that have a fire alarm system shall be powered from the main building fire alarm power supply. N. Section 1505.1 is hereby amended to read as follows: 1505.1 General. Roof assemblies shall be divided into the classes defined in this section. Class A, B and C roof assemblies and roof coverings required to be listed by this section shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E108 or UL 790. In addition, fire -retardant wood roof coverings shall be tested in accordance with ASTM D2898. The minimum roof coverings installed on buildings shall comply with Table 105.1 base do the type of construction of the building. The roof covering or roofing assembly on any structure regulated by this Code within the Historical District Overlay, generally known as the Old Town Temecula Historical Preservation District, shall not be less than a Class C roofing assembly. O. Section 1907A.2 is added to read as follows: 1907A.2 Additional requirements. Slab Dowels in all occupancies, slab connection from existing slabs to new construction shall be placed at a minimum twenty-four (24) inches on center with reinforcing steel of one-half inch minimum diameter, eight (18) inches in length. Embedment to existing shall be a minimum of six (6) inches. P. The following Appendices are deleted in their entirety: Appendices A, B, D, E, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O and P Q. Chapter 29 is deleted in its entirety from the California Building Code 15.04.030 California Residential Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Residential Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter. A. All Appendences, except AX are deleted. B. Appendix AX is amended by adding item (8) to Section 115922(a) to read as follows: (8) One (1) of the two (2) required pool safety features of the seven (7) specified above and from the Health and Safety Code 115922, must be an enclosure that meets the requirements of Section 115923 of that code. The second required pool safety feature must be one of the remaining six (6) features listed in Section 115922. 15.04.040 California Electrical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Electrical Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 90.4 is hereby amended by adding the following to the end of the code section: 90.4 Enforcement. Violations of this Code are subject to the prohibitions set forth in Section 15.02.060 and the penalties set forth in Chapter 1.20, of this Municipal Code. For commercial projects an electrical contractor shall be responsible for obtaining permits for electrical work performed. B. Section 90.8 is hereby amended by adding the following: (C) Connecting Conductors. Accessory uses or other building, or signs, separately located on the same lot or premises shall have connecting conductors run underground. (Agricultural area excepted.) (D) Spare Circuits. Where spare circuit protective devices are provided or space for future circuit protective devices are provided on the bus in any flush or semi -flush mounted panel, then raceways of sufficient capacity to permit utilization of such space or spaces shall be provided to an approved accessible location. (E) Electric Vehicles. Circuits for electric vehicle charging stations shall meet all the requirements of CEC Article 625. Residential garages shall have a minimum one (1) inch metal flex conduit ran from meter box to the garage fire wall and terminated in a metal box at forty-two (42) inches above finished floor for future electric vehicle charging station. All residential electrical applications shall provide two (2) future expansion conduits from the meter box, one each stubbed to an approved, accessible upper and lower location. C. Section 110.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: 110.5 Conductors. Conductors used to carry current shall be of copper, aluminum, or copper -clad aluminum unless otherwise provided in this Code. Where the conductor material is not specified, the sizes given in this Code shall apply to copper conductors. Where other materials are used, the size shall be changed accordingly. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no aluminum conductors smaller than #6 A.W.G. shall be used. 7 D. Table 300.5, Location of Wiring Method or Circuit is amended by revising `Under a building' to read as follows: Under a building: `Six (6) inches beneath the bottom of slab', in all corresponding columns. E. Section 334.10 is hereby amended to read as follows: 334.10 Uses permitted. Type NM, Type NMC, and Type NMS cables shall be permitted to be used in the following: (1) One and two-family dwellings. O Multi -family dwellings permitted to be types III, IV, and V construction xcept as prohibited in Section 334.12. (3) No type NM, NMC, or NMS, or non-metallic sheathed cable (Romex) shall be used in commercial applications regardless of mixed -use occupancy. F. Section 690.4 (A) is hereby amended to read as follows: (A) Photovoltaic Systems. Solar Photovoltaic Systems shall only be installed by registered California Contractors License Board entities with a valid A, B, C- 10 or C-46 contractor license or the property owner. Valid copies of the contractor's City of Temecula Business License and California Contractors License Board license shall be submitted on the plans. The current carrying conductors of all sources of energy *shall be designed to de -energize, and remain de -energized, from their respective source of energy generation when the utility -supplied service's main breaker is opened (set to the "off' position) on the electrical system being energized by the aforementioned sources of energy. *For purposes of this section, "sources of energy" includes alternating current, solar, wind, battery and fuel cell. The point where the current carrying conductors are to be de -energized and remain de -energized shall be immediately adjacent to the point of energy generation or immediately adjacent to a combiner box, if so equipped. This shall apply to all electrical system installations, regardless of location of conductors inside or outside of any structures. Solar systems not installed on roofs — Foundation and/or footings size plans and substantiating design calculations shall be submitted showing supporting member sizes, dimensions, materials and the loads which will be imposed on the foundation or footings. Where the supporting framework of the modules or arrays is shown as part of the 8 laboratory approved system, design calculations will not be required for the supporting framework of the modules or arrays provided they are included in the approved listing. 15.04.050 California Mechanical Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Mechanical Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter. A. Section 104.5 is hereby deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the California Mechanical Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by Resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. B. Section 106.3 is hereby amended to read as follows: 106.3 Penalties. Violations of this Code are subject to the prohibitions set forth in Section 15.02.060 and the penalties set forth in Chapter 1.20, of this Municipal Code. C. Section 504.1 is hereby amended by adding the following: 504.1 General. Where not specified in this chapter, exhaust ducts shall be constructed and installed in accordance with Chapter 6 and shall be airtight as approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Environmental air ducts that have an alternate function as a part of an approved smoke -control system do not require design as Class I product -conveying ducts. Aluminum flex ducts are not permitted to be installed horizontally n rooms that produce steam. An angle greater than forty- five degrees from the vertical is considered a horizontal run. 15.04.060 California Plumbing Code. The following amendments, additions and deletions are made to the California Plumbing Code, 2022 Edition, as adopted by this Chapter: A. Section 106.3 is amended to read as follows: 106.3 Penalties. Violations of this Code are subject to the prohibitions set forth in Section 15.02.060 and the penalties set forth in Chapter 1.20, of this Municipal Code. B. Section 104.5 is deleted in its entirety and superseded by Sections 15.02.010 through 15.02.050 of this Municipal Code, expressly incorporated herein by reference. All references in the California Plumbing Code to fees, fee schedules, or fee tables shall mean the fee schedule as established by resolution of the City Council in accordance with Section 15.02.010 herein. G1 C. Section 211.0 is amended by revising the definition of `industrial waste pipe' to read as follows: Indirect Waste Pipe. An indirect waste pipe is a pipe that does not connect directly with the drainage system but conveys liquid wastes by discharging through an approved air gap into a plumbing fixture, interceptor or receptacle which is directly connected to the drainage system. D. Section 719.5 is hereby amended to read as follows: 719.5 Access. Cleanouts installed under concrete or asphalt paving shall be made accessible by yard boxes, or by extending flush in paving with a `brass cap' or other approved material for installation where subject to vehicular traffic. E. Section 1213.3.1 is added to read as follows: 1213.3.1 Testing. Testing of gas piping two (2) inches or greater or exceeding twenty (20) feet in length shall require a thirty (30) minute test witnessed by the jurisdiction. Such test shall be sixty (60) p.s.i. All welded pipe shall be graph tested for twenty-four (24) hours at sixty (60) p.s.i. witnessed by the jurisdiction. No gas tests shall be performed at less than ten (10) p.s.i and at not less than fifteen (15) minutes witnessed by the jurisdiction. F. Section 1211.8.1 is added to read as follows: 1211.8.1 Installation. The installation of Seismic Gas Shutoff Valves shall comply with the following requirements: Be installed by a contractor licensed in the appropriate classification by the State of California. Exception: Seismic gas shutoff valves may be installed by a gas utility provided a permit is obtained and the valves are installed and approved in accordance with this section. 2. Be mounted rigidly to the exterior of the building or structure containing the fuel gas piping. Exception: This requirement need not apply if the Building Department determines that the seismic gas shutoff valve has been tested and listed for an alternate method of installation. 3. Be listed by an approved testing laboratory and certified by the Office of the State Architect. 4. Be approved by the Building and Safety Department. 10 5. Have thirty (30) year warranty, which warrants that the valve is free from defects, and will continue to properly operate for thirty (30) years from the date of installation. 6. Where seismic gas shutoff valves are installed as required by this section, they shall be maintained for the life of the building or structure or be replaced with a valve complying with the requirements of this section. H. The following chapter of the 2022 California Plumbing Code IS adopted in its entirety: Chapter 13, Health Care Facilities and Medical Gas and Vacuum Systems. I. The following Appendices of the 2022 California Plumbing Code are adopted in their entirety: Appendix A, B, D, H, IAPMO 31-2014 of Appendix I, and J. 15.04.070 Penalties for violation of Chapter 15.04. Any person, firm, partnership, or corporation violating any provision or to failing to comply with any of the requirements of this Chapter or any of the Codes hereby adopted, shall be subject to the penalties set forth in Chapters 1.20, 1.21 and 1.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Each and every person, firm, partnership, or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each and every day or any portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or the Codes hereby adopted is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm, partnership or corporation, and shall be deemed punishable therefore as provided in this Chapter. 15.04.080 Civil remedies available. The violation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or any of the Codes hereby adopted shall constitute a nuisance and may be abated by the City through civil process by means of restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction or in any other manner provided by law for the abatement of such nuisances." Section 2. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Ordinance or the Codes hereby adopted be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences and words of this Ordinance and the Codes hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. This Ordinance shall become effective upon the later of January 1, 2023, or thirty (30) days after adoption. Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. M PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Matt Rahn, Mayor 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27th day of September, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 13 Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of August 2022. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed thirty-nine (39) new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted two (2) Public Hearings in August 2022. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Planning Statistics August2022 Long Ranize Projecu 9 Accessory Duxelling Unit 1 Conditional Use Perinit3 1 Development Plan Extension of Time I Home Occupations Minor Exception 2 Modifications Pre-App 4 Temporary Use Permit Variance 1 Wireless Antenna Facility Zoning or Plannin¢ Letter 3 Tuial Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City has worked with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis along with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. The project is scheduled for City Council on September 13, 2022. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER) Firenze (PA21-1023): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 498,557 square foot hotel and apartment project. The approximately 148,545 square foot, five story, 224 room hotel includes a conference center, restaurant, wine market multi -tenant space, and outdoor courtyard dining space. The approximately 350,012 square foot, seven story, 121-unit apartment building include a roof top area that contains a pool/spa, cabanas, fire pit, media wall, kitchen, fitness area, and lawn/game area. The parking for the project is located on the interior of the apartment building that is wrapped with the residential units. The project is located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER) MS Mountain View Phase V (PAs 22-0593, 22-0594, 22-0595): The City is processing three (3) Development Plan applications for industrial buildings of 21,793 square feet, 11,369 square feet, and 22,769 square feet located along Avenida Alvarado. The projects are scheduled for Planning Commission on September 21, 2022. (COOPER) Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 130,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 14,000 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. A public scoping meeting for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was held on March 23, 2022, at the Ronald H. Roberts Library. The Draft SEIR was provided to staff for review. (COOPER) Temecula Resort and Spa (PAs 22-0035, 22-0037): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90-foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilitiesiballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1 st Street and 2nd Street. (COOPER) Temecula Hyundai (PA22-0293): The City is processing a Modification to a Development Plan for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road. (COOPER) Sommers Bend SHAWOOD Home Product Review (PAs 22-0494, 0495, 0496): The City is Processing Home Product Reviews for Planning Area's 19, 20B, and 21 of Sommers Bend. There are a total of 57 homes ranging in size from 3,203 square feet to 4,974 square feet with three (3) different architectural styles. Home Product Review for these planning areas was previously approved on June 2, 2021. The applicant is proposing new architectural styles with new construction techniques for these larger homes. (COOPER) Seraphina Tentative Tract Map No. 38267 (PA22-0830): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38267) for the creation of 39 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 12.77 acres located on the southwest corner of Joseph Road and Rita Way (APN: 957-080-027). (COOPER) Boutique Luxury Hotel (PAs 22-0929, 0930, 0931): The City is processing Development Plan for an approximately 54,699 square foot, four-story, 45 room hotel that includes retail spaces, a gym, meeting space, and a rooftop restaurant and pool area. The project is located on the west side of Old Town Front Street approximately 400' south of Santiago Road adjacent to the U-Haul dealership. The application package also includes requests for a Minor Exception for the height of the building to accommodate architectural tower elements and a Variance to allow for parking within the setback due to the narrow width of the project site. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING General Plan Update The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update: On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City's six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City's Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. The last BRC meeting is scheduled for July 21, 2022. The Preliminary Draft document will be presented to all Boards and Commissions in August and September. The Final Draft QLMP is tentatively scheduled for the September 27, 2022, City Council meeting. (PETERS) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the Community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building & Safety, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. On, October 19, 2021, staff presented at the draft site plan and architecture designs to the Southern Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR). On November 30, 2021, staff held an Open House to solicit feedback from the professional community (i.e., Engineers, Contractors, Architects, etc.), the meeting will be open to the public. Staff is currently reviewing the construction drawings. (RABIDOU) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment (LR19-1458): An amendment to the Uptown Specific Plan to implement the following changes: modify graphics to reflect consistency with text regarding allowable frontage types, amend street cross sections (graphics), amend plant pallet and Silva cell requirements for street trees, implement a street naming convention, amend streetlight spacing and other typographical errors. A meeting to discuss the street cross sections is scheduled for 8/11/2022. (COLLINS) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for the California Environmental Quality Act evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS) Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. Staff took the draft to Community Development Brainstorming Meeting on May 4, 2022, for review. Revisions necessary. (COLLINS) Shopping Cart Ordinance (LR21-0909): An ordinance to modify Title 9 Public Peace, Morals and Welfare of the Temecula Municipal Code to regulate shopping carts. Shopping carts continue to be left throughout the City, costing taxpayers and businesses money to retrieve, repair or replace these carts. The ordinance proposes mandatory physical measures for all retailers with shopping carts, exemptions provided for, exemptions are invalid for retailers whose carts are found more than 3 times in a 12-month period. Staff presented the draft ordinance to the City Council Public Safety Subcommittee on January 18, 2022 (Rahn, Edwards), direction to staff was to conduct more outreach to businesses, chamber of commerce as well as to present the ordinance to the Planning Commission Commercial Center Subcommittee. Staff hand delivered 82 letters to all businesses within the City, presented the draft ordinance to the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce on January 11, 2022, and presented to Planning Commission Commercial Center Subcommittee on February 16, 2022 (Turley-Trejo, Watts). Commissioners were supportive of the ordinance, recommended the framing be as a responsibility and not assign blame. Staff was requested to present again to the Subcommittee's to show outreach efforts and report feedback. The Shopping Cart Ordinance (1st read) was passed on July 12th, 2022, staff will follow up with another in person visit with code enforcement in early September to further explain the requirements and timeframes for implementing theft prevention measures. (COLLINS) Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan (LR21-1331): Temecula applied for and was awarded a $300,000 grant to develop Temecula's first Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). The grant has a $78,000 match (staff time), the remainder is to onboard a consultant to draft the plan. RFP has closed and selection will take place week of September 5th. (COLLINS) Municipal Code Update (LR22-0182): An update to the Temecula Municipal Code Title 5 and 17. Updates to Title 5 are limited to clarification for exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 5.22 Massage Establishments specific to chair massage and specifies limits to existing exemptions. Updates to Title 17 include changes to the separate conveyance of Accessory Dwelling Units IAW AB 345. Additionally, ADU's would require all equipment (including window AC units) to be screened from the R-O-W and update the definition of guest house and secondary dwelling unit. Update PDO-4 & PDO-10 to require restaurants that provide live entertainment comply with Chapter 9.10 Live entertainment License. (COLLINS) WRCOG REAP Agreement (LR22-0664): An agreement between WRCOG and the City to provide consultation services to provide analysis of required municipal code updates as they relate to the new slate of housing laws, such as SB-9, ADU Laws, etc. Additionally, would evaluate changes to the municipal code required after the adoption of the 6th Cycle Housing Element. The cost is included as a benefit to member agencies of WRCOG. (COLLINS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021, City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March 2021. The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June 2021. The project is under construction. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019, for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. The project has received state tax credits as of June 2022. The applicant is moving forward with the project based on this additional funding. (WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process, community engagement, and California Environmental Quality Act. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Council Member Edwards and Mayor Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo, will serve as advisory bodies. Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. A Housing Workshop was held on August 17, 2021, with approximately 12 attendees. The item was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at the September 15, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection have signed -off on the Housing Element. The item was approved by the City Council on October 12, 2021. The City Council adopted the revised Housing Element on February 8, 2022. Staff has submitted an informal set of changes to HCD. (RABIDOU) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for August 2022 are highlighted in the following table. Building & Saficty StatisticsAqpw Permits 524 New Single Family Units 59 New Commercial BuildinE $ Flxotnyoltaic 190 Tenant Empro t ement 13 Non Construction C of O 47 Dumber of Active Plan Checks 259 Number of Kc-w Plan CheeL 12.7 Dumber of FinAed Permits 420 Inspections 3215 Inspections Per Darr 114.52 Inspections Per Person Per Day 22.96 Stcps Per-Xiontll 1028 Visitors to Counter 1132 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 SF) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 SF) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 SF) on Jefferson and Winchester • Hotel Curio (72,486 SF with 31,808 SF basement Parking) 41h Street • Solana Way Senior Assisted Living and Memory Care (72,882 SF) • Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 SF) • New Industrial Building (32,792 SF) • New Margarita Recreation Center (8,161 SF) • Nine (9) Industrial Buildings — Mountain View (219,609 SF total) • Longhorn Steakhouse (5,710 SF) (old Marie Callendar's location) Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy • The Urban Island Restaurant (2,600 SF) • Live Well Family Counseling (2,234 SF) Tenant Improvement • Dave's Hot Chicken (1,924 SF) • Boba Time (819 SF) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month August, Code Enforcement responded to 97 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 103 code cases, conducted 175 regular inspections, conducted 8 weed abatement inspections, and forwarded 50 referrals. Code Enforcement Statistics bandaned or Inoperable Vehicle 3 Vacant Home: Prop- Mamtenance : ufestaxionl Business or Home Occupation IV.. 0 license. CUP 1 Trash and Debris. Dumping Overzrown Vegetation IA`eeds . Fire Hazard 6 Green Pool.'. vector Control Stamant water Graffiti 7 ltiolse.Nuisanc Antmal Control 9 Trailer. RV Stored -Boat -Parking 1s Construction wib PennitlBuilding Cade 10 Encroach Public ROW/ Trash Cans 17 Zoning. signs 12 Public Safety- & Health 1 Total Number of Cases 103 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Statistics August 2022 Residential - Default 3- Residential - Foreclosure 17 Residential - RE 13 Total - Residential 64 Co=ercial - Default 1 Commemal - Foreclosure 0 Commercial - RED 0 Total - Commercial 1 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0849 40764 Winchester Rd 910-420-031 Jaime Cardenas 08/01/2022 Curtis Brownlow Temecula Towne PL Modifications Corrections Temecula, CA 92591 Center Assoc Case Title / Description: Safa Jewelers MOD: a Modification Application for a facade change to incorporate new colors and materials for the future Safa Jewelers located at 40764 Winchester Road, Suite 500. PA22-0858 28690 Old Town Front St 922-043-024 Eric Jones 08/03/2022 Bernard Truax Temecula Truax PL Extension of Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Hotel Partners Time Old Town, LLC Case Title / Description: Truax Hotel Development Plan Extension of Time: The 3rd Extension of Time for the previously approved Truax Hotel Development Plan. The project is generally located along the southside of Third Street between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street. PA22-0860 26201 Ynez Rd 910-281-001 Jaime Cardenas 08/03/2022 Aaron Snyder Crown Castle BRE 26201 Ynez PL Wireless Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 USA Inc -agent Antenna Facility for TMOBILE Case Title / Description: 26201 Ynez Monopalm WTF MOD: a wireless telecommunication application to replace existing wireless antenna facilities including antennas, radios, cabinets, brackets and other equipment to the monopalm located at 26201 Ynez Road. PA22-0861 31845 Temecula Pky 961-080-008 Jaime Cardenas 08/03/2022 Richard Brett GALILEO VAIL PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 RANCH LP Case Title / Description: DQ Patio MOD: a modification application for a proposed new patio cover outside of Dairy Queen located at 31845 Temecula Parkway, Suite 5. PA22-0874 39970 Cantrell Rd 957-130-020 Eric Jones 08/08/2022 Tina Naber Tina Naber PL Development Out Temecula, CA 92591 Plan Case Title / Description: A Development Plan Application for a proposed 9,100 square -foot daycare facility on the vacant 2.46-acre parcel located at 39970 Cantrell Road. PA22-0875 39970 Cantrell Rd 957-130-020 Eric Jones 08/08/2022 Tina Naber PL Conditional Out Temecula, CA 92591 Use Permit Case Title / Description: White Barn CUP: a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a daycare facility within a future 9,100 square -foot building at 39970 Cantrell Road. Page 1 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0893 26631 Ynez Rd 921-720-006 Jaime Cardenas 08/10/2022 Tom Rudnai PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Toyota EV Chargers: a Modification Application for the installation of one, dual charger and one, single car charger at the parking lot of the existing Toyota dealership located at 26631 Ynez Road. PA22-0895 45640 Jeronimo St 918-323-008 Jaime Cardenas 08/10/2022 Andrew Nunez Jefffry Gorman PL Minor Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Exception Case Title / Description: 45640 Jeronimo Setback Minor Exception: a minor exception application to allow for a 15% setback reduction to the proposed addition at the rear yard of the existing single family home located at 45640 Jeronimo Street. PA22-0897 27430 Ynez Rd 921-290-014 Jaime Cardenas 08/10/2022 Rochelle Owens BTAA Prop Inv II PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 27430 Ynez Road ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 27430 Ynez Road. PA22-0903 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 08/11/2022 Ryan Orr Temecula Towne PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Center Assoc Use Permit Case Title / Description: Temecula Promenade Pumpkin Patch (Pumpkinland): A Major Temporary Use Permit for a fall festival and pumpkin patch event between September 23rd through Oct. 31st, 2022 at the Promenade Mall North parking lot (near J.C. Penny's located at 40820 Winchester Road). PA22-0913 30684 Sky Terrace Dr 945-233-009 Jaime Cardenas 08/17/2022 08/17/2022 Robert Sheppard Robert Sheppard PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Sheppard Addition MOD: a Modification Application for a 120 square -foot room addition at the rear of the existing property located at 30684 Sky Terrace Drive. PA22-0920 32130 Temecula Pky 959-410-003 Scott Cooper 08/18/2022 08/25/2022 Nina Raey EF RH Real PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Estate Ventures Case Title / Description: Aldi Elevations MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to add an additional entrance for a future tenant, a new cart corral, and to expand the existing trellis and stone material of an existing building located at 32130 Temecula Parkway. PA22-0923 916-400-058 Scott Cooper 08/18/2022 08/31/2022 Domenic Solana PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA Ramundo Winchester LLC Case Title / Description: Solana Winchester Elevation & Site MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA20-1371) for a change in window types and locations, addition of architectural elements, removal of patio gates and non -required walkways, a reconfigured tot lot, and changes to planting and irrigation located at 41100 Temecula Center Drive. Page 2 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0924 29766 Rancho California Rd 921-310-024 Jaime Cardenas 08/18/2022 Kimberly Boone Kimberly Boone Kirk Kuzmanic PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Associates Associates Case Title / Description: Moraga Plaza Car Wash Repaint MOD: a modification application to apply to paint to ten existing car wash building located at 29766 Rancho California. PA22-0925 29762 Rancho California Rd 921-310-022 Jaime Cardenas 08/18/2022 Kimberly Boone Kimberly Boone Moraga Plaza PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Associates Associates Case Title / Description: 29762 & 29760 Rancho California Road Paint MOD: a Modification Application to repaint the existing commercial buildings located at 29762 and 29760 Rancho California Road. PA22-0926 33320 Temecula Pky 965-410-003 Jaime Cardenas 08/19/2022 Karin Corona Family PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Raubenheimer LTD Partnership Use Permit Case Title / Description: ABC Tree Farms, LLC Temporary Use Permit: A Temporary Use Permit to allow a pumpkin patch from September 1, 2022 to November 11, 2022. The project is located at 33320 Temecula Parkway. PA22-0929 922-100-048 Scott Cooper 08/19/2022 Sam Mohan OM PL Development Plan Review Temecula, CA RESIDENTIAL Plan REAL ESTATE Case Title / Description: Boutique Luxury Hotel DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 54,699 square foot, four-story, 45 room hotel that includes retail spaces, a gym, meeting space, and a rooftop restaurant and pool area. The project is located on the west side of Old Town Front Street approximately 400' south of Santiago Road adjacent to the U-Haul dealership. PA22-0930 922-100-048 Scott Cooper 08/19/2022 Sam Mohan OM PL Minor Plan Review Temecula, CA RESIDENTIAL Exception REAL ESTATE Case Title / Description: Boutique Luxury Hotel ME: A Minor Exception for the height of the building to accommodate architectural tower elements PA22-0931 922-100-048 Scott Cooper 08/19/2022 Sam Mohan OM PL Variance Plan Review Temecula, CA RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE Case Title / Description: Boutique Luxury Hotel VR: A Variance to allow for parking within the setback due to the narrow width of the project site Page 3 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0940 30528 Spica Ct 945-212-020 Jaime Cardenas 08/23/2022 Kristen PL Accessory Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Rodriguez Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Rodriguez ADU: an Accessory Dwelling Unit application for the addition of a 560 square foot ADU to the existing single-family home located at 30528 Spica Court. PA22-0941 42146 6Th St 922-053-037 08/23/2022 Ryan Oldham S&L Hasan, Inc. PL Development Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Plan Case Title / Description: Old Town Temecula Town Homes: a Development Plan Application for the construction of 14 multifamily residential units on the vacant .68-acre parcel located at 42146 Sixth Street. PA22-0948 28400 Rancho California Rd 921-020-041 Jaime Cardenas 08/24/2022 Renee Poteete Temecula HHG PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Hotel Planning Letter Development, LP Case Title / Description: 28400 Rancho California ZL: a Zoning Verification Letter for 28400 Rancho California Road. PA22-0951 31493 Rancho Pueblo Rd 959-071-043 Jaime Cardenas 08/25/2022 Spiro Azkoul Andrew Ho, MD PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Rancho Pueblo EV MOD: a Modification Application for the installation of 10 level two electric vehicle chargers at the parking lot of the existing property located at 31493 Rancho Pueblo Road. PA22-0952 32668 Via Destello 959-292-012 Scott Cooper 08/25/2022 09/01/2022 Kimmberlee Kimmberlee PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Bobadilla Bobadilla Case Title / Description: Bobadilla Patio MOD: a Modification Application for a proposed 385 square foot patio enclosure located at the rear of the existing property located at 32668 Via Destello PA22-0954 27350 Nicolas Rd 920-100-058 Scott Cooper 08/25/2022 Daniel Bowman Irwin Partner PROTEA PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Architects SENIOR LIVING TEMECULA Case Title / Description: Vineyard Ranch MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-0172) to revise the Phase II parking lot, relocate the trash room to an outdoor enclosure, updated the landscape plans, revised the elevations to include trellises and a new main entry to the Phase II building, and locate the site amenities within the Phase II Memory Care courtyards for use by the residents. The project is located at 27350 Nicolas Road. PA22-0957 28676 Old Town Front St 922-044-009 Jaime Cardenas 08/26/2022 Arianne O'Neill Kenneth (Ken) PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Rauton Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 28676 Old town front ZL: a Zoning Verification Letter for the commercial property located at 28676 Old Town Front Street (955-442-030). Page 4 of 5 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0967 43235 Corte Almonte 955-141-033 Scott Cooper 08/29/2022 09/07/2022 Stephen Jacob Fry PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Magerkurth Case Title / Description: Fry Room Addition MOD: A Modification for an approximately 297 square foot room addition at the rear of the existing property located at 43235 Corte Almonte PREAPP22-0 965-400-001 08/15/2022 Jim McMenamin STAGE & PL Plan Review 907 Temecula, CA DEPORTOLA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Stage Portola Property Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a proposed Map for 182 single-family residential units with related improvements. The project is generally located on the southeast corner of De Portola and Butterfield Stage Road PREAPP22-0 28677 Old Town Front St 922-045-033 Eric Jones 08/18/2022 Jayson Linda Lash PL Cancelled 921 Temecula, CA 92590 Johnstone Pre -Application Case Title / Description: OT Pub and Grub Patio Preapp: a pre -application for the addition of a 3500 square foot patio expansion for a new bar and outdoor dining over the existing parking lot located at 28677 Old Town Front Street. PREAPP22-0 28677 Old Town Front St 922-045-033 Eric Jones 08/22/2022 Jayson PL Plan Review 936 Temecula, CA 92590 Johnstone Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Pub and Grub Patio Expansion Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow for an approximately 3,500 square foot patio expansion for an existing establishment. The project is located at 28677 Old Town Front Street. PREAPP22-0 29485 Rancho California Rd 944-290-007 08/29/2022 Joe Barbano PL Plan Review 965 Temecula, CA 92591 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Temecula Gardens admin office and recreation center Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow for the review of a new leasing/administration and recreation center at an existing apartment complex. The project is located 29485 Rancho California Road. PREAPP22-0 29540 Rancho California Rd 921-320-061 Eric Jones 08/31/2022 George Ray PL Plan Review 981 Temecula, CA 92591 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Commercial Redevelopment Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review two new fast food establishments totaling approximately 4,500 square feet. The project is located at 29540 Rancho California Road. Page 5 of 5 Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Report Wendy Miller, Management Analyst That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Service Calls August 2022 � Incident Type Commercial Fire 1 False Alarms 83 Haz Mat 7 Medical 666 1959 Multi -Faro 0 �.�A o� 0 NVW Other Fire 3 Other Misc 6 Public Assist 47 Residential Fire 4 Rescue 2 Ringing Alarm 0 Standby 8 Traffic Collision 77 Wildland/Vehicle Fire 6 Total 910 5lel�r �3 � • • � �• • . ■ • ��-- M • ■ ■ • •w • ti • t• • • ■ • • •• ■ ■ • • •■.r • ■ ■ ■ +: i ■.■� • ■ ■ ■•■� • S!el iun 92 • ■ iii� w• � �• / • PE CH ANLACASINO AM RV n w City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections August 2022 �116 0481959/y i1 10 Plan Review and Inspections Plan Review Construction Inspections Annual Inspections Counter/Public Inquiries August Year to Date ------------ 1 573 3961 346 2946 454 4464 33 260 I� • r k. "016- 7 J _AL - J ■ r J , 1p I 9/11 Remembrance Celebration Fairview Fire Base Camp Temecula Duck Pond 1 Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: September 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new crossing of Murrieta Creek. Cost: $37,248,262 Status: The City received 30% plans for a low flow crossing. Environmental agencies have stated that a low -flow crossing is a non -starter. Design consultant is preparing a bridge planning study, to be completed in Summer 2023. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $14,255,991 Status: Phase 1 design, Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies, and Phase 1 permitting November 2019 — January 2023. The Initial Study has been approved, Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted, and Notice of Determination filed in May 2022. Design is 90% complete. Regulatory permit applications have been submitted for USACE 404 Nationwide Permit and CDFW Streambed Alteration 1602. Current activities include consultant review of 90% plan check comments, design coordination with utility purveyors (SCE, RCWD, and EMWD) and City project PW16-05 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, Riverside County Flood Control review of 90% design plans and Encroachment Permit application, and preparation of regulatory permit applications for SWRCB 401 Water Quality Certification and USACE Section 408. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase 11, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $138,736,346 Status: Design and environmental revalidation is complete. Right of way acquisition process is complete. Construction funds have been authorized/obligated. City is evaluating proposals received September 1, 2022 in response to RFP 270 for Construction Management / Resident Engineering services. The Construction Contract is out to bid August 29 through October 6, 2022. Target for beginning of construction is December 2022. 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $8,971,710 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — November 2022. Current activities include Caltrans review of 100% Roadway and Structures PSE, Storm Water Data Report, Drainage Report, and Permit Engineering Evaluation Report. Caltrans has tentatively approved the CEQA Categorical Exemption. City is preparing a supplemental cultural resources study to support the revalidation of the environmental document. The Notice of Determination will be filed upon project approval under the Permit Engineering Evaluation Report. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $26,073,374 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019, meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA JPR Conformance is approved. NEPA approval is anticipated in September of 2022, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. Project has received MSHCP conformance. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management had proposed reducing the curb -to -curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff has been able to address this issue with Caltrans and the majority of the bridge width will remain as a participating cost. 2022 HBP Bridge Update was submitted in August. Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $2,894,420 Status: The Design Consultant submitted 60% submittal package in mid -July. Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive. Cost: $448,045.00 Status: Construction contract was awarded by City Council on August 9, 2022. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access to the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,347,674 Status: The traffic signal and the new access road to the Park and Ride are fully operational. Access to Park and Ride from Vallejo Ave. has been closed and a permanent block wall will be constructed. Construction completion is anticipated in October of 2022. 4 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting, PW21-16 Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road. Cost: $400,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Citywide Drainage Master Plan, PW19-16 Description: Project will prepare a report that shows all drainage courses within the City. Also includes a master hydrology study showing the anticipated storm flows at build -out. Cost: $600,000 Status: Design consultant is cataloguing all drainage in GIS. Project completion anticipated for Spring 2023. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $10,708,232 Status: Phase 1 award of construction contract is scheduled for 9/27/2022. Fire Station 84 Renovation, PW19-14 Description: This project includes the design, construction, and renovation to Fire Station 84. The renovations include, adding a Wellness Room, expanding the Storage Room, and upgrading the Training Room. Also, the upgrades include, electrical, windows, flooring, paint, tile, HVAC, cabinets, plumbing fixtures, garage bay doors and any necessary improvements needed to conform to ADA accessibility access. Cost: $1,641,028 Status: Advertisement for construction bids was cancelled. Contract documents are under revision and project will be re -advertised. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $3,58,483 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — October 2022. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, and Design Engineering Evaluation Report. Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $12,601,508 Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020, to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021, City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Major demolition activities commenced mid -March. City Groundbreaking occurred on March 31, 2022. Building footings have been poured. Foundation was completed mid -August andframing is well underway. Pool excavation, placement of steel reinforcement, and concrete for the pool base is complete. Roofing is expected to start end of September 2022.. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in spring 2023 with a grand opening in Summer 2023 after the building is furnished and equipped. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows. Cost: $1,262,025 Status: On 9/13/2022, City Council rejected all bids and authorized staff to re -bid the project. N. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area, PW22-08 Description: The project includes the design and construction of a shuffleboard court area adjacent to Mary Phillips Senior Center. In addition, the HVAC units will be replaced. Cost: $650,000 Status: Project kickoff on 9/14/2022. Design estimated to be completed by November 2022 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $7,173,595 Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State S131 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Jefferson undercrossing section is complete. Ynez undercrossing section is complete. Asphalt for entire trail is complete. Tieback wall section under 1-15 section is complete. Contractor is currently working on wall and concrete trail sections under 1-15. The current concrete shortage has significantly extended the completion date as most of the remaining work requires concrete. The last remaining wall under the I-15 was poured on September 7, 2022, The last concrete work was completed on September 14, 2022. Remaining work will be completed the last week of September 2022 with the Grand Opening scheduled for Saturday October 1, 2022. Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Cost: $2,716,764 Status: The project is in design. 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) expected in January 2023. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: ADA Access Ramps have to be revised. The project is scheduled to be advertised for construction bids in September 2022. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $467,403 Status: Project is currently in design. Pavement Management Program — Meadowview/Paloma Del Sol, PW21-06 Description: Pavement rehabilitation project on various internal streets in the Meadowview Community as well as Amarita Way, Montelegro Way, and Santiago Road in Paloma Del Sol. Pavement rehabilitation includes a asphalt leveling course, asphalt rubber aggregate membrane (ARAM), and slurry seal. Replacement of existing pedestrian ramps and restriping is also included in the project Cost: $4,732,266.70 Status: Construction contract was awarded at the July 26, 2022 City Council Meeting. Construction started on August 15, 2022 and is anticipated to be completed in December of 2022. l' City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures, PW21-07 Description: This project provides for the conversion of the CRC's wading pool into a splash pad, and the addition of shade structures in the area. Cost: $1,100,000 Status: Project is at 60% design. Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Construction was completed on March 20, 2022. Project was accepted by Council on August 23, 2022. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Vail Ranch Park and Long Canyon Creek Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $800,000 Status: An RFP is being prepared for the design, purchase & installation for three playground project sites — Redhawk Community Park, Long Canyon Creek Park & Temecula Creek Park. E City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of a new restroom building, including additional stalls and urinals, a large snack bar and a dedicated storage case. Cost: $1,120,000 Status: The construction contract was awarded at the April 12, 2022, City Council meeting. Construction began on May 16, 2022. Construction completion is anticipated in September 2022. 10 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS American Tire Depot Description: A 7,303 square foot building to be used for tire retail and repair, as well as minor auto repair services, located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive. Status: Parking lot has been paved. Wet utility tie-in construction has commenced. Arrive @ Rancho Highlands Description: A 270-unit multi -family community built on 12.32 acres that includes 55 affordable units. The project is located adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond approximately 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road. Status: Grading and onsite storm drain permits were issued in October 2021. Grading and onsite storm drain construction has commenced. Overflow parking lot has been paved. Heirloom Farms Description: A Development Plan for a 321-unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. Includes the installation of a new Traffic Signal at the intersection of Ynez Rod and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive Status: Rough grading permit has been issued in July 2021, the offsite and private onsite street and storm drain improvements permits were issued in October 2021 and the traffic signal permit was issued in September 2021. Grading, street, and storm drain improvements and the traffic signal installation has commenced. Precise Grading plans are currently being reviewed. Las Haciendas Apartments Description: A Development Plan to construct a 77-unit affordable housing project located at 28715 Las Haciendas Street in Uptown Temecula Status: Precise grading permit was issued in December 2021. Grading has commenced in January 2022 and is ongoing. 11 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT September 27, 2022 Longhorn Steakhouse Description: 5,708 square foot restaurant with outdoor patio located at 29363 Rancho California Road Status: Precise grading permit is approved. Construction expected to begin soon. Mountain View Description: Thirteen industrial buildings on Avenida Alvarado Status: Eight precise grading permits have been issued and construction has commenced. Improvements on Avenida Alvarado, along with street light installations is in process. Onsite storm drain installation has commenced. Solana Assisted Living Description: A 90,000 square foot, two-story, Senior Assisted Living Facility located on the southeast corner of the Margarita Road and Solana Way. Status: A rough grading permit was issued in January 2022. Grading began on February 7, 2022. Street improvements and precise grading plans have been submitted for review. Sommers Bend Description: Land Development has provided oversight of the following submittals for plan check and inspections: final maps, Community Sports Park, and recreation lots, precise grading; street and storm drain improvements; traffic signals; street lighting; and signing & striping. Status: The mass grading permit was issued in September 2018. Sommers Bend has been paved with streetlights installed. The community sports park, Ranch at Sommers Bend, construction is complete and has been accepted at the February 8, 2022, Council Meeting. The Sommers Bend recreation center construction is complete. Installation of streets, storm drains and streetlights on east end of project is in process. Grading has been completed in the Density Core, currently installing sewer. Installation of Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements northwest end of project is in process. 12 Supplemental Material Items for Placement Consideration on Future City Council Aqendas — A. Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) r ROB BONTA Attorney General September 23, 2022 Sent via email Matt Rahn Temecula Mayor 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Matt.RahnAtemeculaca.gov Zak Schwank Mayor Pro Tern 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Zak.Schwanka,temeculaca.gov Maryann Edwards James "Stew" Stewart Jessica Alexander Temecula City Council Members 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Maryann.Edwards(a)temeculaca.gov James.Stewart@temeculaca.gov Jessica.Alexanderntemeculaca.gov t 1. OI t4t pI ® M w State of California DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1300 I STREET, SUITE 125 P.O. BOX 944255 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2550 Public: (916) 445-9555 Telephone: (916) 210-7894 Facsimile: (916) 324-5567 Email: Renuka.George@doj.ca.gov RE: Proposal to Discuss a Resolution Banning Abortions in the City of Temecula Dear Mayor Rahn, Mayor Pro Tern Schwank, and City Council Members: It has come to the attention of the Attorney General's Office that at the September 13, 2022 meeting of the Temecula City Council, a member of the City Council stated her intent to introduce a resolution that would purport to ban abortions in the City of Temecula. It is our understanding that such a resolution may be on the agenda for your next City Council meeting on September 27, 2022. September 23, 2022 Page 2 As I am sure you are well aware, local laws may not conflict with state laws. (See Cal. Const. art. XI, § 7.) Local legislation that conflicts with the general laws of the state are void. (Cohen v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 40 Ca1.3d 277, 290; People ex rel Deukmejian v. County of Mendocino (1984) 36 Cal.3d 476, 484.) A conflict exists if the ordinance duplicates, contradicts, or enters an area occupied by general law, either expressly or by legislative implication. (Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1993) 4 Cal.4th 893, 897.) The California Legislature and the California Supreme Court have declared time and again that California is a reproductive freedom state and that Californians have a right to access abortion. In 1981, the California Supreme Court held that "all women in this state rich and poor alike possess a fundamental constitutional right to choose whether or not to bear a child." (Comm. to Defend Reprod. Rights v. Myers (1981) 29 Cal.3d 252, 262.) Consistent with this precedent, the Legislature enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which codified a woman's fundamental right to procreative choice. (Health & Saf. Code, § 123462.) To that end, the Legislature forbid the state "and every county, city, town and municipal corporation" in the state from interfering with a woman's right to choose to bear a child or to obtain an abortion. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 123464, subd. (c), 123466; see also Missionary Guadalupanas of Holy Spirit Inv. v. Rouillard (2019) 38 Cal.App.5th 421, 435 [abortions are a "basic health care service" and must be covered by health plans].) Any attempt by the City of Temecula to limit an individual's ability to exercise their right to reproductive choice and bodily autonomy would be a violation of state law. California's Attorney General takes seriously his obligation to protect Californians' right to reproductive freedom. Our office will not hesitate to take legal action should a local regulation conflict with California state law. Thank you very much. Sincerely, 4�-- RENUKA GEORGE Senior Assistant Attorney General For ROB BONTA Attorney General cc: Peter Thorson, Shareholder, Richards, Watson, and Gershon, City Attorney for the City of Temecula (pthorsonaaxwglaw.com) SA2022302797 AG Letter to Temecula-9-23.docx REQUESTS TO SPEAK AND ELECTRONIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD REQUEST TO SPEAK \, CITY OF TEMECULA �vsv Date: Z-1 Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ')6 Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. 0 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. -f' Name: � � el C �� Phone Number: `/� Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: —a7 Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Iterrf Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. / ) Name: Phone Number: - Address: Email address: F If you are representi an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK c CITY OF TEMECULA 19 1989 _ Date: L Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. ofN C7"iJ 4 IT Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: S/ M OtJ , /^'I V2!lil3%/� eA �Z�Z If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK < CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record.. % Name: T� I [�'�� 1\ i�� _ Phone Number::] � Address: _; Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK Y CITY OF TEMECULA 912 �7 / J� Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: X❑ Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. x°1^ 0o" Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp iior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Address: Email address: . If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: x,11A � Phone Numberl — Yjurtt�+, C1 �zsGZ Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK �9 CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: - I 2 ZZ Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: k Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. [A! t Q, 10 St � 5/� 64 f XA, DJ e(- Abol � cw fall ,1/ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the G�ity Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record., Name: Cb f i 6k,P e, [ 1 C r en D Phone Number: Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non-Ag v--e_ -� Item Descr tion or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: a Item: tN Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ �Ia Aq 4n-6 0" Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar magi ?submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record., % 0 /` _ Name Addres Email a If you a Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK ® CITY OF TEMECULA wxv l Date: /o� 7Z 2 > Public Comment: Non -Agenda Iterrk-,E] Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name forthe Name Addres Email a If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA I Z � ' �] _% Date: vI (- (- Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: 4 Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Zan Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: SQ Y� n`�h� jU / eA I Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 10 CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Qi a1 ,J n Date: ` � //"��•G7,i Y` Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item/�q Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. \/'fit Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: 1� ( c�� &ec1 Phone Number: Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK -�_ CITY OF TEMECULA 19H9 Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda J rd Item Description or Item No. 1� Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items lisjed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Publ�lpz6mment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak for ay be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is cal d to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: ��� (� ' ?7� r Phone Number: Address Email address: If you are ,King an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CO19N9.) CITY OF TEMECULA Date: _ �/J i/ fi/ j Public Comment: Non-Aqenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Aqenda Item: te Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. <--I i, -, /n_._ Name Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Phone Number: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK G1989 CITY OF TEMECULA lay �a0aa Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item:LVJ II `` 1 it t Item Description or Item No. JL 551Ca F LXa nd tr c, P ro G air � ko bon AorllT toh5 G� Lt nary C i� y Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Lioa to _ Phone Number: Address: Email address: � If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: F1 Agenda Item: Future Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. lv1� K-.1�il�i�� a`% S Request to Speak forms for Public Comrtfents or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the rec//��ord. I / Name: !"��I Xf V��J�Jur� � V 1l la46,(ePhone Number: Address Email ac If you ar give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK , \ CITY OF TEMECULA Date: /L, J Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: C Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. r t� Name: Phone Number: Address: �� ,, Email address: � you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK N CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 L Dater Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: El Agenda Item: Future Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. 14. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar fnay be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. c Name: �3c�—}— ! "'� �t Phone Number: Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: l/-.,r' 0 �cl 0-4 �6 fc _-6s 1 �^ o c c-2__ Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA I'M Date: ctZ'Z Z�ZZ Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. A- 04, Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: i�!k�(O Phone Number: Address Email address: e�uula-. If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ a Item Description or Item No. A - REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: O�C2�tl �nz2 Agenda Item: M_Flut`u're Agenda Item: mac+ p. __11 v V 1p aS `� �=NyQGJ� G. �N�F&20, Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar: may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. '- Name: �`C� JS Phone Number: Address: V�Sco mod, C_w l� Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK r'a CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item: Future Agenda Ite Item Description or Item No.c� r Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Phone Number:_,' Address Email adc If you are representing an organizaiion or group, please give ine name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 19xk) Date: 1 7' �, 7-2 Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item: Future Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. � �- ��'� � ' � 1^� ��� ��%�!? Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk Liar to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record, Name: ,IBC M nA r , I / Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 6� CITY OF TEMECULA 6 rnty Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item:1Z Future Agenda Item Item Description or Item No. LS - t- 4-1 `^ �2 de-cl-tl l e—me_1_41L, 44 Request to to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Gre �p^ w°1' Email address: ± ►'� If you are representing an organization ollr group, please give the name: C. ;�T Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Agenda Item: Future Agenda Item: Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. J; ,, /� Name: �� fires"Ala Pk ' Phone Number: _ Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:21 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: City council meeting From: Jennifer Gacek < Date: September 14, 2022 at 3:44:20 PM PDT To: Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@temeculaca.gov>, James Stewart <James.Stewart@temeculaca.gov>, Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@temeculaca.gov>, Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City council meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I'm emailing you in response to the upcoming meeting about declaring Temecula as an "anti -abortion" city. The fact that this is even up for discussion is wrong on so many levels. Please vote against the declaration. It does not speak for the city of Temecula rather it only speaks for a group of people within the city. Please do what is right....vote no. Best.. Jenn Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:16 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Time to go From: Kim Olivares < Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 9:00 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Time to go CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Abortion ban ... are you kidding? Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:16 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: From: Mari Glionna < Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 9:21 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Council Member Alexander, As a resident of Temecula for several years I am appalled that you would even suggest an abortion ban within our city. Stripping away the fundamental rights to govern one's own body is offensive and out of touch with the community. Why is it so hard for people to separate church from state? How dare you impose your personal beliefs on the people who voted for you. You most definitely lost my vote the next time you are up for re-election. Please focus on pressing issues such as traffic, growth, and homelessness. That's what we are paying you for, not to suggest some ridiculous legislation imposing your religious beliefs on your constituents. Sincerely, M Glionna Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:15 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban From: isellhomes michaelcrawford.biz <isellhomes@michaelcrawford.biz> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 5:33 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.Bov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. You need to keep your religious beliefs out of city business. You were elected to help run the city, NOT to run peoples lives. I will do my best to start a "recall" on you. Michael Crawford Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:20 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Opposition to resolution to proclaim Temecula a "city of life sanctuary" From: Lynn Lambrecht < Date: September 15, 2022 at 7:07:25 AM PDT To: Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@temeculaca.gov>, James Stewart <James.Stewart@temeculaca.gov>, Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@temeculaca.gov>, Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>, randilohlcouncilassistant@temeculaca.gov Subject: Opposition to resolution to proclaim Temecula a "city of life sanctuary" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To all: The first clause in the Bill of Rights states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion." The United States was founded as a democracy, embracing the separation of church and state and pluralism. The idea of pluralism is that people of different cultures can co -exist in society even though they have different political opinions. Society benefits from various people with different beliefs equally participating in the same society. Imposing a "city of life sanctuary" status to our city does not respect the constitution, pluralism or democracy that our country embraces. This is a private matter between a woman and her medical provider, not the City Council or the government. Government officials place their hand on a bible as they swear an oath to uphold the constitution, rather than placing a hand on the constitution and pledging to uphold the bible. In our society, we are free to practice (or not) religion. I urge you to be reminded of the values you pledge an oath to. You are free to have personal opinions, yet as a representative of all, your job is uphold the freedoms of ALL. I am strongly opposed to the resolution of our inclusive city to become a "sanctuary of life" city. Temecula has heart means something to me as a resident for 17 years. Thank you for registering my opinion. I urge you to reconsider this resolution. Sincerely, Lynn Lambrecht Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:15 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city -----Original Message ----- From: Doug Ferrette < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 10:28 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Matt, I want to thank you for managing such a great city. My family and I have lived her since 2007 in Harveston and enjoy raising our children here. We are proud of our city and invite family and friends over to enjoy the abundant activities the city offers. I am an Air Force officer and C17 pilot at March ARB. I have over 1,000 combat hours protecting American values and freedoms abroad. I am asking you to not drag Temecula into divisive politics and not vote on creating Temecula as a sanctuary city for the Pro Life movement. Don't divide neighbors and friends that live in harmony in this city. We are better than this and creating a city that aligns with one side will split our city like many politicians are doing to the country. I hope the council considers the feelings and choices of half it's constituents that support Pro Choice. Thank you for your time and feel free to respond. Douglas and Michelle Ferrette Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:09 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion From: Patricia Sullivan < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 2:18 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. September 15, 2022 Temecula City Council 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To all Temecula City Council Members: I was shocked this morning to hear that you're considering making Temecula a Safe City, forbidding women to have abortions. I do not support either side of the abortion argument. Neithershould you. I do not believe this is any business of the City Council — I certainly don't believe it's in your Charter of Responsibilities. It is none of my business; it's none of your business either! To abort or carry a fetus is a very difficult, individual decision only a woman in that position can make. I pity the woman who has to make that decision. Should you continue down this path, I will take my business (tax related business) to Lake Elsinore and Menifee. I will also exert whatever influence I have with my friends and neighbors to do the same. Every woman had the right to make her own decisions — medical or economical. Your business is the Economical health of Temecula City. Stay out of the Medical life of women. Respectfully, Patricia A. Sullivan Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:20 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city proposal From: Kathy McCarthy < Date: September 15, 2022 at 4:40:18 PM PDT To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@temeculaca.gov>, Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>, Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@temeculaca.gov>, James Stewart <James.Stewart@temeculaca.gov>, Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I seriously hope the council does not entertain the request made by Ms Alexander for Temecula to become a Pro Life sanctuary city. Once again she is inserting her religious views into governmental affairs. California state law allows abortions - period full stop. I certainly hope the council has more important issues relative to actual city business than to allow her once again to promote her for right agenda. Her previous ridiculous remarks about masks and her Rosa Parks moment made the rounds on national comedy shows - (Trevor Noah and Stephen Colbert) . Does the council really want our city to be known as fodder for comedians? I would hope we would want to promote our beautiful city and wineries for tourists. This type of stunt to make us a sanctuary city could lead to boycotts that would adversely impact our tourist dollars. Ms Alexander is certainly entitled to her religious beliefs and I suggest to exercise them in the church of her choice, not by wasting the council's time. Thank you. Kathy McCarthy Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:06 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban From: Timothy Robbins < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 6:16 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think its completely hypocritical of you to spout off building a stronger, unified community, and then propose a ban on abortion. Keep your personal views out of it. By removing someone else's bodily autonomy to match your world views makes you a terrible person. No one is being forced to have an abortion. It is a personal choice. And taking that away from someone else makes you the monster, not them. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:06 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: From: Sylvia Aguirre < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 6:31 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.eov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor, Pro. Tern and City Council Members, I would like to commend you all for taking a stand against abortion. As a young woman who was working and going to school and found herself with the hard decision of having an abortion or quit school. I chose to have my baby. I married my now husband and we had our daughter. I am proud to say she is a Marine Biologist who teaches Science to at risk high school students in the Marin County. She is a beautiful, bright and hardworking woman and would have never had the opportunity had I had the abortion. I can only wonder how many of those beautiful babies might have grown to be brilliant contributions to our world. I would like the thank you again and pray for blessings for you and your family. Sylvia Aguirre Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:19 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula-#1202887 City Clerk [15723] From: Temecula <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 6:49 PM To: Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula-#1202887 City Clerk [15723] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Temecula New Report Submitted - #1202887 Status new Work Order #1202887 Issue Type City Clerk Notes Disgusted with your city council. We have spent a lot of money in your town, but no more. We will never spend another penny on anything made in Temecula. Reporter Name Fuck your City council Email Phone Report Submitted SEP 15, 2022 - 6:49 PM Open Report Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:05 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Mind your own business -----Original Message ----- From: C Wilson < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 6:57 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Mind your own business CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jessica I suggest that you mind your own business about what abortions. You are a misogynist fool. I suspect you also have some kind of religious beliefs that you think need to be imposed on everyone around you. Temecula is far from being any place I would ever want to spend a dollar. If you want to keep on with your bullshit abortion ban you should just know that I will make it my time consuming hobby to let the world know what a shithole back water hillbilly dump you rule over. Go away and take your fucked up ideas about abortion bans with you. This is California not some imaginary red state where you and your ilk can run roughshod over the rights of women. You know for a f at that if you were raped or got drunk and had sex and ended up pregnant that you would be the first in line for an abortion. The difference is that you would just make it a special exception in your fucked up head. Go to Hell in a handbag Jessica, you twunt! Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:19 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula-#1202894 City Clerk [15724] From: Temecula <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 7:10 PM To: Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randiJohl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula-#1202894 City Clerk [15724] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Temecula New Report Submitted - #1202894 Status new Work Order #1202894 Issue Type City Clerk Notes What a shame that Temecula wants to become a sanctuary city for fetuses. As a woman, you are completely ignoring my rights. As an already born full grown human. You are choosing the wrong fight. I will never again visit your city, wineries, restaurants or other tourist destinations. I wonder how much money a fetus will spend. Choose wisely! Reporter Name Connie Garver Email Phone Report Submitted SEP 15, 2022 - 7:09 PM Open Report Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:05 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Anti -Abortion From: Dawn Culp < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 7:38 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Anti -Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Alexander. Who in the world do you think you are? How dare you even suggest to take free will away from every woman in Temecula? We are given free will and freedom of choice by God himself. Who are you to pass judgement on anyone or to speak and demand that an entire city of women be told what they can or can not do with their body? You dont have to agree with it, you dont even have to like it, but you Do Not have the right to force your female constituents to abide by your beliefs, NO MATTER WHAT!!!. It is all over the news and social media. If their is a demonstration I will have everyone I know there protesting your BSM I will also have a very large boycott of Temecula, especially your precious Old Town and your wineries. Knock you religious BS off!!. First judge yourself. and secondly free yourself of your sin. Leave the rest of us alone. WE CAN MAKE OUR OWN DECISIONS with out your hypocritical, judgemental, religious BS getting in the way. I cant wait until you come up for re-election. I will remind everyone what Bs you tried to pull and if there is a recall, I will help have your butt kicked out Openminded citizen Dawn Culp Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:04 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban From: Will Wilson < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 7:49 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I live outside the city limits, however, I have been a Temecula resident since 1991. When you use language such as "this is our city" it might be wise to consider the position of the city as a whole. It is doubtful the entire city shares your position on abortion. It is certainly unwise to allow 5 individuals to make policy or statements for the entire population. You are, of course, free to state your personal opinion but you cannot speak for the city. I suspect your proposal will fail but I recognize your personal position on the matter. Regards, Will Wilson Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:04 PM To: RandiJohl Subject: FW: Resign From: Christian Frable < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 7:51 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistantCa@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Resign CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. You need to resign. You do not represent the will or needs of your constituents, let alone of people across our state. Shame on you for oppressing other women with your narrow-minded beliefs. Go find another profession. - Disgusted with you Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:03 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Anti Abortion From: loan Kepich < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 8:28 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Anti Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Find your recent statement on anti abortion offensive. Women can decide individually on the issues regarding their own body not you or anyone else. Resident of Temecula Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:02 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Really From: Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 8:37 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Really CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization, Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Maybe it's time for you to move to Alabama Sent from my Galaxy Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:02 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Anti -Abortion Agenda Proposal From: Tyler Evans < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 8:51 PM To: Maryann Edwards<MarYann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Anti -Abortion Agenda Proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, As a constituent in your district, I have grave concerns about what our city and this council have become since 2020. Temecula was a great community of people with an outstanding city council, but national politics have cratered this community into a hotly divided and shifting city. I cannot fathom that the city council would even entertain a proposal to prevent abortions, a right protected by the state of California and a right that was protected by the United States Supreme Court for over 50 years. This completely violates every persons individual freedom to have access to abortion, adequate fertility care, and proper health care. For a council member who claims they are here to unite this community, they have done nothing but create and sow more division. I am always proud of the local community members who often check the rhetoric of this council member that has often been anti-LGBTO, anti -diversity, anti -inclusion, and has been solely bent on nationalizing far -right politics into this community. There is absolutely no right, no privilege, no capacity for this city and its council members entertain yet another media circus on this "sanctuary" from abortion access. With all due respect, this should not be on an agenda, should not continue to be a topic of any discussion, and should be quickly moved past as a protected right by the citizens and people in California. Her place of work and religious views should have no direct inclusion of her actions within our community. I understand she was democratically elected, however, the four other council members must stand against the continued push by far -right candidates who are trying to dismantle this once great community. Due to new school board and city council candidates, I have never been more than wanting to leave this community that I have called home for over 12 years now. I cannot have my daughter attend schools potentially controlled by a board fraught with such political ambitions as well as a potential city council that continually fails to respond appropriately to hateful, insensitive, and intolerant messages by its own members. You have my full support and I will be a voice in favor of your incumbency, however, I am gravely disappointed in the city council for even remotely considering or listening to such proposals. Thank you, Tyler Evans Get Outlook for Android Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:01 PM To: RandiJohl Subject: FW: Concerned Resident From: Tyler Evans (Student) < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 8:59 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.eov> Subject: Concerned Resident CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, As a Temecula resident for over 12 years, I am completely horrified by your time as a city council member. You have no right to attack the LGBTQ community, be so opposed to inclusiveness and diversity in this community, and now creating a national media grabbing circus about a sanctuary against abortion. As a California citizens, we have every right to access fertility care, healthcare, and abortion treatments. You have no right to try to deny those to the people in your community. For a person who touts that they are seeking to unite this community, you're statements and actions since your time in 2020 have been nothing short of divisive. You truly do not represent the entirety of your district or community, but your narrowed interests and bringing in nationalized politics to a local community position that is supposed to be non -partisan at its heart. I am disappointed in this council for entertaining your proposal and I am disappointed of what you have brought this once proud and friendly community. You're representing a divisive, often hateful, and controlling movement that has no place in this community. While you may garner some local support, your actions cannot and will never control my wife or my daughter's rights and many others in this community. Sincerely, Tyler Evans Get Outlook for Android Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:01 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: LA TIMES From: Victoria Serrano < Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 10:22 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: LA TIMES CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Concerned family of Temecula, California. We have recently seen this article in the Times - hope you can you're fucking embarrassing. give up your seat to someone who actually represents the people of california. none of us want a conservative veteran who went to a country they probably look down on to "help disadvantaged families". go read a book and get therapy you fucking weirdo Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:01 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: The New "Sanctuary City" -----Original Message ----- From: Jamie Adkins < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 12:00 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: The New "Sanctuary City" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Evening Council Member Alexander, Hello. My name is Jamie Adkins. I am apart of Temecula's youth. I have been here since I was a child, I just graduated from Chaparral High School and am currently attending California State University San Marcos. I am emailing you today in regards to your very recent statement, "Let the world know that Temecula stands for life from womb to tomb." You may not care to see your emails, as I understand you may have had multiple disagreements in the past concerning your views. I hope you see this one, though. If you care so much to make Temecula a "safe haven" for it's residents, you would care to take a look at the mental health of the youth in your town that you claim to love so dearly. You would help with the homeless population. You cannot claim to love a town you represent and not do anything to help with the people that live amongst you. You might have heard this argument multiple times before, but not allowing abortions only makes more room for unhealthy, unsafe, DEADLY practices. Making this statement alone ensures that you are willing to KILL the women of Temecula. Your sisters, neighbors, mothers, daughters. You do not care about the people of Temecula, you care about forcing birth, protecting rapists, and adding on to the homeless population. Abortions aren't just "killing", they ensure that the mother can stay financially stable, to keep mothers in focus of their education, enter higher -paying jobs, less -likely to fall into poverty... but that doesn't matter to you, correct? Because we need to ensure that Temecula is not an abortion sanctuary! Let alone the foster care system is a joke. I know multiple teachers, friends and family who have gone through it only to experience mass trauma and PTSD. You are adding onto that by pursuing this statement. Please, if you care deeply about the people you represent, I urge you not to do anything regarding abortions. Temecula is growing in a positive way in this moment, however, making abortions illegal in this town would mean that we grow within the homeless population. Help your people, do not disable them from pursuing the right goals that lead to their success. We deserve our rights just as much as a council member does. Have the day you deserve, Jamie Adkins (She/her) Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:15 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Bye bye tourist dollars!!!! From: Diana Blaine < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 7:14 AM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Bye bye tourist dollars!!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I and all of my middle-class suburban friends who enjoy coming to Temecula for our girl's weekends agree that we will NEVER spend another cent in your city. NEVER. My husband and I are not even going to stop at the gas stations on our way home from San Diego anymore. Yes, your decision to even consider taking away the civil liberties of females matters. Hope those fetuses have lots of expendable income so your wineries can stay afloat. Better yet, more to Texas if you hate freedom so much. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:18 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Anti abortion bill From: Rozanne Kraft < Date: September 16, 2022 at 8:21:39 AM PDT To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Anti abortion bill CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please don't buy into this political stunt that Ms Alexander is proposing. It's divisive and has nothing to do with the running of our city. Rozanne Kraft Sent from my Wad Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:14 PM To: Randi Joh) Subject: FW: Temecula-#1203309 City Manager's Office [157261 From: Temecula <reply@mycivicapps.com> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 8:39 AM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Stacey Brown <stacey.brown@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula-#1203309 City Manager's Office [15726] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Temecula New Report Submitted - #1203309 Status new Work Order #1203309 Issue Type City Manager's Office Notes The city Council woman who is proposing a sanctuary city for anti -abortion, should be fired. This is absolutely the worst thing that could put Temecula on the map. To go along with all the other idiots out there that don't believe in pro choice. Absolutely ridiculous. Is banning books next, so we can be just like Texas? This is California. Reporter Name Jill Hardy Email Phone Report Submitted SEP 16, 2022 - 8:38 AM Open Report Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:15 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Jessica Alexander and her political proposal does not represent the city From: Susan Kendall < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 9:02 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander and her political proposal does not represent the city CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This proposal is a ruse and makes the city seem foolish. any time in Temecula or the surrounding area. In fact, there will be a boycott organized for this purpose full council and city. If perchance, it is approved I will no longer spend any money or I may do so anyway if this political ploy is not denied by the It is not within the purview of a city and elected council members to make such a proposal. Instead, why doesn't Jessica do her job of fully representing the city and working toward real issues that affect everyday life and the children and families of the city. Schools, water, traffic, crime, healthcare, jobs --I could go on. Maybe she is not capable of actually doing her job. And this is an easy, oh so easy out for someone who has no leadership skills. Step up, council and make the city a model city not afraid to do real work that makes for strong and vital communities. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:14 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Message - Laurie Malstrom From: Luisa Tovar Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 9:13 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Message - Laurie Malstrom Hi Mayor, Just received a message for you with regard to the upcoming agenda item on September 27tn Resident Laurie Malstrom wanted you to know that it is absurd that the abortion ban is even being considered to be discussed at next Council Meeting. She wanted to remind you that in California it is legal to have an abortion and to try to ban it in Temecula is a violation of women's rights. She stated she has also contact the California Attorney general and if you would like to speak to her about this you are welcome to call her. Caller: Laurie Malstrom Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951)694-6416 Iuisa.tovar(a)temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:14 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank you From: Joe Figueroa < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:06 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.pov> Subject: Thank you CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Councilwoman Alexander. I want to say thank you for your recent position on making Temecula a Sanctuary City against abortion. I live in district 1, Redhawk area but I will gladly support you in future campaigns. God Bless Joe Figueroa Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:13 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Article in the press ent.Temecula sanctuary city for the unborn From: Genevieve Tyler < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:27 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Article in the press ent.Temecula sanctuary city for the unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Miss Alexander: Thank you for the courage you have displayed at the Temecula City meeting last Tuesday and standing up for The Unborn. I correspond through email with one of the Board of Supervisors for Riverside County. He's the Board of Supervisors for our district. I live in the city of Riverside. I would like to communicate with him to find out if the Riverside County Board of Supervisors could meet to discuss a resolution making Riverside County a sanctuary City for The Unborn. I know there will be excessive pushback because I have attended meetings in the past and it can be disturbing. However, I would like to know if you can advise the best way for me to approach our supervisor. I am a retired resident living near downtown Riverside so I'm located near city and County Government. I believe if enough people who are like-minded about protecting The Unborn as to what we are capable of doing to the best of our ability, I believe the fruit from this endeavor will be worth it and will not go to waste. Thank you for reading my email! Respectfully, Genevieve Tyler (Genny for short) Riverside resident Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:59 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary From: Doug Ferrette < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:30 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Jessica, I want to thank you for managing such a great city. My family and I have lived her since 2007 in Harveston and enjoy raising our children here. We are proud of our city and invite family and friends over to enjoy the abundant activities the city offers. I am an Air Force officer and C17 pilot at March ARB. Like you, I have served our country and have over 1,000 combat hours protecting American values and freedoms. I am asking you to not drag Temecula into divisive politics and not vote on creating Temecula as a sanctuary city for the Pro Life movement. Don't divide neighbors and friends that live in harmony in this city. We are better than this and creating a city that aligns with one side will split our city like many politicians are doing to the country. I hope the council is mindful of the feelings and choices of half it's constituents that support Pro Choice including my wife and two daughters (age 16 and 22). Thank you for your time and feel free to respond. Douglas and Michelle Ferrette Sent from my Whone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:59 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula-#1203509 City Manager's Office [15731] From: Temecula <reply@mvcivicapps.com> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:33 AM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov_>; Stacey Brown <stacey.brown@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula-#1203509 City Manager's Office [15731] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Temecula New Report Submitted - #1203509 Status new Work Order #1203509 Issue Type City Manager's Office Notes Support of Jessica Alexander and Temecula becoming a sanctuary city for pregnant women. I appreciate so much her stance and boldness and I pray she will get the support of fellow council members. Please let her know she has our family's support. Reporter Name Nancy Lopez Email Phone Report Submitted SEP 16, 2022 - 10:33 AM Open Report Please do not change subject line when responding. 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:59 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed abortion ban From: Tom Rapport < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:27 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposed abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. You have no right to interfere with a woman's right to control her own body. If you pass this bill, my family along with multiple friends will cancel our wine club memberships and no longer vacation or spend any money at Temecula businesses. I am sure we are not the only ones who will do this. Reproductive rights do not fall under the purview of any City Council. It is disgusting you are even considering this. Tom Rapport Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:58 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Do Not Ban Abortions -----Original Message ----- From: Cait McDonald < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:46 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Do Not Ban Abortions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Mrs. Alexander my name is Caitlin Mcdonald and I saw that you were trying go ban abortions in temecula so that it can be a santuuary. I would like to let you know as a former Temecula Valley Highschool student, if you want temecula to be a sanctuary abortion is not what needs to be changed. Highschools are full of racism, sexual assualt, and rape. Schools will dissmiss racism and SA all the time. Schools are not safe places for kids. I left Temecula Valley Highschool because I did not feel safe. I remember kids bringing guns to school and a lot of kids were doing drugs. Schools are not safe, don't make women not feel safe in their home town. I have lived in temecula my whole life I am 18 years old and have had multiple pregnancy scares and everytime I said I would get an abortion, even though I was terrified of the thought the comfort of knowing I am not forced to have this random boys kid for the rest of my life was something I took for granted. I hope you can see your decision was wrong especially as a women. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:58 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Protection From: Susan Sar < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 12:39 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.Pov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Protection CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Mayor and Council Members, Please see below regarding recent correspondence sent to Jessica Alexander. Thank you, Susan Sar From: Susan Sar < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 12:31 PM To: Jessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov <iessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov>; council.assistant@temeculaca.gov <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Protection Dear Jessica, First, I'd like to thank you for your service, both in the Marine Corps and on the Temecula City Council. Being a public representative is a labor of love and exposes you and your family to stressors not for the faint of heart. As a proud American and daughter of a Vietnam Veteran I am proud of our system of government and am sure to vote in all elections. And I support the civic role of those with whom I disagree. Unfortunately it seems that you are one of those people. Second, I'm writing because your proposition to make Temecula a place where uterus owners cannot get critical healthcare is alarming and disappointing. I suspect that you have little familiarity with abortions or people who need them. Please know, nobody ever wants to have an abortion, they are necessary healthcare. To insert a governmental gatekeeper between a person and healthcare is a clear sign of moral corruption. I will pray for you. Finally, as a mother of a daughter it terrifies me that she could live in a world where she has neither authority over her body nor the support of her civic leaders simply due to the fact that she has a uterus and ovaries. I will fight for her and others until I take my last breath, good Lord willing it's a lifetime away. Peace be with you, Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:57 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion proposal -----Original Message ----- From: Chloe S < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 12:42 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, My name is Chloe Schembri, and I would like to take a moment out of your day to address the agenda for Temecula City council. You claim to want this city to be known as a safe haven, yet you a risking many young girls, and woman's safety, and healthy. Banning abortion is not going to create a sanctuary city, it's going to cause unsafe abortions. Ana Langer a professor and coordinator or Woman's Health Initiative at Harvard says 23,000 woman die from unsafe abortions each year. From a young woman's perspective I am terrified to see this topic be brought up in my own very town. It should be a basic human right to choose what you want to do with your body. What happens to a young woman that has no stable income, or knowledge on how to raise a baby, and she gets raped. Now this girl has a baby, and what does she do? She gives the baby to foster care flooding the system even more than it already is. Thank you for your time, and I really do hope you take a young persons words into consideration. We are the future, and we are the ones that will be having the children. Shouldn't it be left up to us decide what we do with our bodies? -chloe Schembri Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:57 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion From: Tony Brancato < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 12:50 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization, Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sent from Mail for Windows Jessica, You have a great bio dear but you got a hole in your head when it comes to woman rights. There is a million reasons why your stand is wrong and I'm sure you know them all. Tony from Fontana Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:57 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban in Temecula? -----Original Message ----- From: bailey gregory < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 1:10 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban in Temecula? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon, My name is Bailey and I have lived in Temecula for 22 out of my 24 years of my life and have made such amazing memories and friends here. I went to public schools here my whole life, got to learn from the people who had moved here in the 80's or even earlier, I've had so many great experiences in this city I call home. I can assure you that I want our city to be safe and welcoming, and I'm assuming you do as well. So I'm confused as to why you think an abortion ban in my home town of Temecula is going to have a positive impact. Housing here is not cheap, even apartments. And continuing to build new and nicer places to live is increasing the cost of living all together. Health insurance is expensive, if you can even get health insurance. The minimum wage is still not enough to make ends meet for people who rely on those jobs. People who couldn't afford to go to college. Or for people with college degrees whose salary is still incredibly low. If you want to protect the people in our city and assure they're happy here, you have to address them individually. And I don't mean speaking to every person in Temecula, I mean letting them decide what they do or don't do with their body. You cannot take away peoples bodily autonomy and expect them to still respect you. Governor Gavin Newsom wants California to be a safe space for everyone who lives here, EVERYONE! You cannot take away our choice to our own life. Abortion bans may seem like they work but they only stop safe abortions. People will find a way, and that way is usually more traumatic and dangerous. Instead of just losing a clump of cells with the possibility for life, we will be losing real humans who maybe haven't graduated high school yet, real people who just want a better life for themselves. And you are okay with that? You're okay with more people killing themselves intentionally because they can't provide for a child or unintentionally getting an unsafe abortion? Or if you plan to take after Texas, you want to put people in jail or in prison simply because you disagree with their beliefs? In most cases, the person who is pregnant does not want to have an abortion. It's painful and traumatic regardless of the reason. It's not used as "birth control", and if that's what you think then maybe we need to focus on making actual birth control more accessible to the people. If you're against abortion for religious reasons, keep that out of your politics. You cannot force your religious views on an entire city, let alone a single person. Did you forget about separation of church and state? At the end of the day, what I or anyone else chooses to do with their body is not up to you. You can't decide if we get piercings, tattoos, plastic surgery, abortions, etc... If you do not want an abortion, don't have one. That goes for everyone. At least allow them the opportunity to decide. Thank you for your time and please seriously reconsider this proposition, Sincerely, Bailey Gregory Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:57 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban From: jeff aubel < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 1:44 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please just move to Texas already. Get Outlook for Android Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:56 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban -----Original Message ----- From: Juanita Gonzalez < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 2:17 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Jessica I appreciate you serving the city of Temecula. Your proposal to ban abortions is un-constitutional. This country is founded on the principals of religious freedoms. Your proposed ban on abortion imposes on those rights. Your view is not representative of many women in Temecula. Perhaps you should learn more about the harm this will cause women's reproductive health before weaponzing your position on the board. Next time your run for council please be more transparent on your views. Sent from my Whone 1 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:56 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban -----Original Message ----- From: Ginny Williams < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 2:23 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. How dare you express your personal opinion on abortion? As a City council person you are obligated to carry forward the wishes of the MAJORITY of your constituents in this regard! I am ashamed of you. Don't have an abortion if you somehow manage to get pregnant without consent. You, personally. Ginny Williams Q Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:55 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposal to ban abortion... From: Resa Rosenstein < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 2:51 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; zak.schwant@temeculaca.gov; marvann.edwards@temeculaca.go; James Stewart <James.Stewart TemeculaCA.eov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Re: Proposal to ban abortion... CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Honorable Mayor and City Council Members of Temecula, I don't know which city council member suggested such an atrocity, but the ramifications will be greater than merely opposing abortion. This will be an invitation to protests, more than likely violence (because people today have no tolerance for opposition in a peaceful manner). The ensuing bloodshed, due to protesting this proposal, will be on each City Council members' hands and the Mayor's for the abortion pathway you are suggesting. Each one of you will be accountable for the results of your actions for approving this ban if it passes, as protests will take place. In addition, you haven't considered the financial ramifications involved. I can tell you as a former "Woman of Distinction" of Menifee and the myriad of social and community groups I am involved with, that the city of Temecula will be considered a plague and that many residents in the surrounding area that financially support Temecula will cease. Example in place- if I happen to be in Temecula and this ban is approved, I will not shop at CostCo, as I will go to the one in Murrieta. I will not take family, friends, and tourists to Temecula, instead I will go to surrounding communities for restaurants, entertainment, and, yes, even vineyards, like San Antonio and others in Ontario, as an example. The loss of city taxes will be a shock to the city of Temecula, and they may never return if this ban goes through. It will forever damage the City of Temecula as being branded by this action. This is not the path that Temecula should venture down. Sometimes, decisions made momentarily will have a lifetime catastrophic effect that time will not erase. I implore you to not approve this proposed ban on abortion. Sincerely, Dr. Resa Rosenstein Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:56 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban -----Original Message ----- From: Anthony Orrico < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 3:43 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Do you not know or not care that this would violate California state law. Or are you just trying to gain political clout. Sent from my Whone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:55 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Mind your own uterus From: Maegan Mize < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 4:06 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Mind your own uterus CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Why don't you try fixing real problems instead of trying to force your own opinions on a whole city. Banning abortions is RIDICULOUS and UNSAFE. Forcing women to carry a child they don't want is stupid and dangerous. What kind of life would that child be born into? Being unwated and resented with a mother who is maybe too poor to even care for them or is mentally unstable and subjecting them to abuse. As a woman I am absolutely appaled and shocked that another woman is so ignorant and willing to take away womens rights. No one cares about a sanctuary for the unborn. How about you do something for the living breathing children in our town not a clump of cells. Why don't you work to fix the foster system so that children aren't being abused and assulted by a faulty system. If you were really pro life you would do something to help them or make sure sex education was still instilled in ALL schools. How about make sure contraceptives are easily available and affordable for all. You're an embarrassment to all women. Sincerely, Every educated woman in America who cares about Women Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:54 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Citywide Abortion Ban From: Jeff Wittek < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 4:29 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov_>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart<James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.go_v>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Opposition to Proposed Citywide Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon Temecula City Council Members, This correspondence is meant to express our strong opposition to the proposed citywide ban on abortions. With so many challenges facing our city and residents, it is extremely troubling that Temecula City Council would involve itself and our City in such acts of political theater. Finally, we want to clearly express our unwavering commitment to vigorously work against the re-election of Jessica Alexander, and any/all Temecula Council Members that support this proposal, during the next election cycle. Regards, Jeffrey A. & CindySue Wittek Temecula, CA 92591 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:54 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Recent statements on abortion From: Luke Downer < Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 5:12 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Recent statements on abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mrs. Alexander, I recently listened and read your statements regarding abortion and actions you would like to see taken in Temecula to ban this option for women. I have been a member of the Temecula community for many years. While I support the right for individuals to express their opinions and positions, I am offended that you would make statements that assumptively and incorrectly attach me to yours. "This is our city, and what happens in our city is our responsibility." "Are we willing to stand up and fight for every resident? Let us be the first city in California to make a stand. Let's mark our city as a sanctuary city for Temecula's unborn." If this is truly our city and you are interested in fighting for every resident then you would not make such general statements that ignore those who believe in and support a woman's right to choose. As a representative of the City of Temecula you should be incorporating and considering the position of all its residents, not just the ones that share your beliefs. I am firmly pro -choice and would much prefer Temecula to be seen as a sanctuary that protects a woman's right to choose and embraces a thoughtfulness when considering the complexities and health implications that are inexorably tied to this decision. As much as I disagree with your position, I do value diversity of opinion and thought. It is with this understanding that, when given the opportunity to represent others, it is critical to make every effort to eliminate broad and careless statements that alienate, insult and minimize any portion of that community. It is concerning that an individual with a clear lack of this consideration and understanding has been given the opportunity to make sweeping statements that are offensive and not supported by many members that call Temecula home. When preparing for your next speech or other communication(s) that shares the intent and purpose of initiatives, I would suggest the use of pronouns that reflect your position (I and me) and refrain from catch all words (every). Your position in no way reflects that of my own and many others. To assume that it does is both arrogant and ignorant. Regards, Luke Downer Temecula Resident Sent from my iPad Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Do not ban abortion -----Original Message ----- From: Jeanne Kingston < Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 11:02 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Do not ban abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization, Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Council - Please do not ban abortion. This shouldn't be an issue the city is considering. The City of Temecula banning abortion does not fit with the "Temecula Safe" motto. Temecula needs to be a safe space for women - women who need safe healthcare options. Why should the city take this on- why make our city less inclusive, less safe and take away rights for half of our (tax paying) population? It seems a council member has a conflict of interest on this issue and should excuse herself from this vote. Adding this issue to the agenda brings unfavorable attention to our city and hurts our tourism industry- passing this will do further damage to our reputation, tourism dollars and ultimately make women less safe. Abortion saves lives of women- from a married mother who miscarries and needs a lifesaving medical procedure to the young girl who has been raped and had all innocence stolen from her. Please do not ban abortion. (From a concerned conservative resident who wants to protect the rights and lives of women and girls.) Jeanne Kingston Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban -----Original Message ----- From: Danielle Bojorquez < Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 12:54 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. YOU ARE A SAD EXCUSE FOR A WOMAN!! We are ready to protest you every bit of the way! I hope you have a daughter who falls pregnant at 16! I'm sure your stance on abortion would change then! You are going to ruin this city!! People are already talking about boycotting wineries ... YOU ARE BAD FOR BUSINESS! YOU ARE BAD FOR OUR CITY! You are TRASH and never forget that!! Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: You contemplated abortion ban From: Meryl Lander < Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 3:57 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: You contemplated abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a partner in a wine distribution firm and broker Temecula wines for numerous restaurants in California and other states across the country. Most likely almost, if not, all of our restaurants and wine selling establishments will refuse to carry Temecula grown / bottled wine g should you decide to pass this ill-conceived, misogynistic, dangerous, anti -freedom, backwards, disturbing law. Women who lack access to all normative pre -natal care often DIE because some ill-informed pro -lifer thinks he will save babies lives. And would you personally adopt a born with fetal -alcohol syndrome, one addicted to meth or heroine, or one born with extreme congenital abnormalities? I think 2) not. So, the state will pay for their healthcare, and our TAXES WILL GO UP BECAUSE YOU WANT TO BE THE CHRISTIAN SAVIOR. Not everyone in the US or Temecula is Christian. There are two synagogues, Chanda, and an Islamic Center in Temecula. Both religions believe in the sanctity in a mother's life and gives precedence over that of the unborn. One cousin had almost died of an ectopic pregnancy when her fallopian tube burst. My aunt aborted a Tay -Sachs baby — they didn't have genetic testing. I expect tourism to dry up. In addition any Jewish customers will refuse to buy or drink Temecula wine, again, as this goes against their religious tenets to put the health of a living woman before that of a fetus. Again this goes along with the word dangerous. Thank you Cocoa Mojo (yes, I don't need death threats for expressing the truth) Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sasha Giryan - Concerns From: Sasha Giryan < Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2022 7:29 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sasha Giryan - Concerns CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mrs. Alexander, My name is Sasha Giryan, and I live in the Temecula valley area. I am emailing because I have some concerns over an article I read about you on ABC7. I have linked the article for you below, in case you would like to read it yourself. You seem to want Temecula to have a city wide ban on abortions. Not only does this go against the position of leaving the devious up to the states, it is also unconstitutional and morally wrong. I will quote you from the article itself: ,Are we willing to stand up and fight for every resident including the unborn babies who are voiceless? Let us be the first city in California to make a stand. Let's mark our city as a sanctuary city for Temecula's unborn." I find this abhorrent and disgusting, especially the fact that you want to bar a coroner from holding an inquest after a fetal death, including in cases where a stillborn was believed to be caused by drugs. As someone who will be looking for another potential Councilperson after your term, I would like to see what you have to say about this bill you have proposed, and why you think it would be a good idea. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Sasha Giryan Sent from Gmail Mobile Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:51 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: "Safe Haven" Proposal for Unborn Babies From: Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2022 5:10:04 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.pov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: "Safe Haven" Proposal for Unborn Babies CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members - it has come to my attention a "Safe Haven" proposal for unborn babies has been added to the agenda for the next Temecula, CA City Council meeting. Though I live in NJ I'm urging you to support this proposal. Science proves that life begins at conception. An unborn baby is distinct from his/her mother. He/she is a unique living human being with his/her own DNA, blood, heartbeat and organs. Abortion is an assault on innocent human life. It is so prevalent and the most straightforward attack on innocent babies that it is the most important human rights issue today. By supporting this proposal, you can save babies' lives and help change our culture. Thank you. Diane DiGiovacchino Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:51 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank you! From: judith seki < Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2022 10:12:31 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistantCc@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Thank you! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for your strong, correct stance on human life from conception to natural death. I wish you were running for San Gabriel City Council so that I could vote for you! Judy Seki San Gabriel, CA Sent from my Whone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:50 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Message - Louis Shapiro From: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 8:49 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Message - Louis Shapiro MCC - Good morning, I just received a phone call from Louis Shapiro asking I relay the message to City Council to congratulate Temecula for making it a sanctuary city for the unborn. I told him I would relay his message. Caller: Louis Shapiro Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951)694-6416 luisa.tovarnu temeculaca.00v 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:50 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Keep Abortion Access -----Original Message ----- From: Eric Wurst < Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 3:32 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Rebecca Wurst <rmwurst@verizon.net> Subject: Keep Abortion Access CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Rahn, Mayor Pro Tem Schwank, and Councilmembers Edwards, Stewart and Alexander, As a longtime residents of Temecula, we urge you to to reject any action that would seek to ban abortion access in the City of Temecula.. Respectfully, Eric & Rebecca Wurst Temecula CA, Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion proposal From: Glen Joyce < Date: September 19, 2022 at 4:29:19 PM PDT To: Matt Rahn <matt.rah nC@temeculaca.gov>, Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>, Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@temeculaca.gov>, James Stewart <James.Stewart@temeculaca.eov>, Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Temecula City Council, Some of your council public profiles say one of your main objectives as council members is to work to unify our Temecula community. Do you really think Jessica Alexander's controversial proposal about abortion is going to unify our community? If so, then I think your judgement is poor. I can't think of a more divisive issue for you to take sides on and force upon your citizens. If Jessica Alexander's proposal passes, you will have put a permanent tattoo on every citizen of Temecula. A tattoo that expresses Jessica Alexander's personal religious beliefs. I don't want her tattoo. Temecula hospitality businesses don't want her extremist tattoo either. Since news of Jessica Alexander's proposal broke a few days ago, 2 parties who had previously shown interest in our property are no longer interested. They have concerns about living in such a politically charged community that appears to invite controversy, where the city council could allow the extreme political and religious views of one council member to be imposed on the entire community. For those 2 parties, buying property in Temecula would now be a source of embarrassment rather than a source of pride. I don't blame them. I have lived in Temecula since before it was named Temecula. People used to equate Temecula with wineries, golf, and good weather. Now, most people equate Temecula with political and religious extremism. Please do not approve Jessica Alexander's proposal. Don't approve extremism. Keep Jessica Alexander's personal religious beliefs out of our lives. Thank you, Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:50 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City Proposal From: Linda Cioppa < Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 4:43 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.eov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Cioppa Ralph < Subject: Sanctuary City Proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We are writing to express our deep disappointment and dismay that Temecula would even consider making this city an anti abortion sanctuary.This should not be a political issue and should not be considered by a political body. Decisions regarding a woman's health should be solely between her and her physician. To allow others to participate in that decision, based not on medicine but on politics, when no other medical decisions are decided by political considerations, is completely unacceptable and denigrates women and their equal status. Please reject this despicable proposal. On top of any other consideration it would put this city, which is dependent on tourists and their revenues, in a position that is not acceptable to a majority of this country's citizens. They may decide to show their unhappiness by going elsewhere. Linda and Ralph Cioppa Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City From: Sandi Siler < Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:12 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.Qov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please do not let Temecula become a sanctuary city against abortion . It is totally wrong Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban From: Michael Sheahan < Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 6:21 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I will make this short and sweet. Your bio says nothing of religious affiliation, but I will assume a Christian one. If your philosophy on this issue is Christian based then by the first amendment of the constitution, it doesn't hold water. Anywho, you might want to read freakonomics... Specifically the main reason why crime decreased in the late 80's; when there was an expected spike upwards. Had nothing to do with increased policing and money in that regard, or any other governmental policy. 2/3 of the reason for the decrease in crime was directly related to Roe v Wade. Beware! You may reap what you sow. Read it before responding.. Best Regards, MichaelSheahan Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:48 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban -----Original Message ----- From: Diana Hofman < Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 8:27 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. NOT your job to remove the rights of women !!! When you start showing active help for the children in need, then you will be acting responsibly. You will NOT force your views on everyone else!!! Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:54 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Call - Resident Sherri Ritter From: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 8:55 AM To: Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temecuIaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Call - Resident Sherri Ritter Good morning Maryann, I just received a call from resident Sheri Ritter whom you may remember. She asked me to relay a message to you regarding that "woman's proposition to take away women's rights" and wanted to tell you she is completely against it. She knows you have always been good for the City and hopes you are able to keep "her" from doing this to our beautiful City. She wanted you to know she used to work at Macy's for 16 years and she used to have red hair. She stated she is very supportive of your leadership. I told her I would relay her message to you. Caller: Sherri Ritter Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951) 694-6416 luisa.tovar(a)temeculaca.4ov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:54 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Comment for sanctuary of life From: Karen Brann < Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 9:29 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment for sanctuary of life CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Randi, Thank you for taking my comment: Good evening council members This past weekend a creepy old man exposed himself to me just after a hike in Santa Rosa. I'm fine now, but the reason that is so traumatizing is because he took from me something that should've been in my control. He forced my eyes to see something they can't unsee. My eyes, my body, he forced them to his own benefit. This is the same reason rape is traumatizing, because someone forces your body for their experience. People say this is the same reason you can't force someone to give birth. When I was pregnant with my second child I was rejected and abandoned. I became a single mom of two not having finished my degree and dependent on family. When I pushed that 81b 5ounce cutie out without any medication it was the single most empowering thing I've ever experienced. I roared her out and she came out roaring right back. I was so motivated after that, I knew I could take care of those babies myself. I felt I could do anything. Then I started my own business. I became one of the busiest doulas and childbirth educators in this area. I helped hundreds of women through their pregnancies and births by telling them their bodies can do this. When a birthing woman does not experience this, she describes the experience as feeling hijacked. When I was 18 1 was raped at a party. I went to planned parenthood a few days later. They gave me the plan B pill with the explanation that it would "keep me from becoming pregnant." I didn't know. Then they gave me a Pap smear, which id never had before. After having just been raped, I was so further traumatized by that Pap smear, because it was so invasive to me on my body, that I decided I would never have one again. If I had waited weeks to go in there and if they'd done an abortion, that would've been further trauma. It would not have helped me reach my goals and dreams. It would not have empowered me. You know who would've loved that and benefited from it? The rapist. Rapists love abortion. Traffickers love abortion. Pimps love abortion. And they love it when we lie and say it helps women. No, abortion keeps women enslaved to those people. If you believe that rape is wrong because the rapist is forcing something on someone's body for their benefit, then you MUST also believe that abortion is wrong! Abortion is forcing death on someone's body for another's perceived benefit. No one forces a pregnant woman to birth, her body does that itself. Her body is the one that grows and births the baby, and that empowers her. Regardless of how she got pregnant, she does it. Her body grew the baby and her body births the baby. When you lie and say she's being forced, you are telling her that the very thing that could make her the strongest makes her weak. Please empower women by making Temecula a sanctuary for life. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Message - Diane Beavers From: Luisa Tovar Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 12:06 PM To: Jessica Alexander <iessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Message - Diane Beavers Hi Jessica, I received a call from resident Diane Beavers asking me to relay a phone message to you. She wanted to tell you thank you for standing up for the unborn, continue your efforts and God bless. Caller: Diane Beavers Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951)694-6416 Iuisa.tovare-temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Call/Message - Resident, Paula Yeany From: Luisa Tovar Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 12:23 PM To: Jessica Alexander<iessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Call/Message - Resident, Paula Yeany Hi Jessica, I received a call for you from Ms. Yeany asking to relay her message to you. She wants to tell you that your proposal to ban abortions in Temecula is outrageous and she is extremely upset. Your views do not reflect everyone else's in Temecula and you should not be on the City Council. Instead you need to listen to your constituents, she will be sure to never vote for you again. Your proposition is ridiculous. Caller: Paula Yeany Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951)694-6416 luisa.tovar(EDtemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed Resolution to Make Temecula a Sanctuary City for the unborn From: Eva Smith < Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 1:17 PM To: Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposed Resolution to Make Temecula a Sanctuary City for the unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon Mayor and City Council members, I am also copying Randi Johl and Erika Ramirez to request that my statements be read into record respectfully at the City Council meeting. My name is Eva Smith, I am a registered voter, retired Wireless Communications Engineer, Community Volunteer, Faithful voter and a proud resident of Temecula for over 24 years. I am asking the City council to vote no on the resolution to make Temecula a Sanctuary city for the unborn. The council member wants the city of Temecula to be the sanctuary of the unborn, but it doesn't provide the same support for access to affordable sexual healthcare, reproductive healthcare or mental healthcare. By adopting the resolution the City of Temecula will put the lives of mothers who have miscarriages or loss of a child which requires an abortion to save their lives. By adopting the resolution the City will send the community a message that the City doesn't care about the living, the unhoused or access to affordable health care. By adopting the resolution the city will be violate federal and state laws which will also subject the City to a lawsuit and boycotts from residents and tourists who will choose to visit other destination cities such as Napa, San Diego Wine Country or Paso Robles for their wine country vacations. This proposal is making the city look bad. Just take a look at some of the comments of social media pages for an example of some of the national feedback from CNN to the LATimes. I also do not want my taxpayer money wasted on litigations and I also do not want to see our city lose their reputation and revenue due to to the reduction in tourism if this resolution passes. If our city is willing to take the steps to focus on the well being of others, please pass a resolution to provide housing for the homeless, affordable housing for middle income residents or start a resolution to protect our children in our schools from gun violence, fentanyl overdose or suicide, Temecula City council, please vote no on this resolution. It's time to focus on the needs of our community and not frivolous resolutions. The future of our thriving community depends on it. Eva Smith Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Anti Abortion Resolution From: Pete Ramos < Date: September 20, 2022 at 2:38:22 PM PDT To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Anti Abortion Resolution CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I oppose the proposed resolution by Alexander regarding Temecula an anti abortion sanctuary city. Pete Ramos Former Temecula City Commissioner Sent from Mail for Windows Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:51 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Homeless Crisis & Fire Hazards in the wash behind VRMS From: Stephanie Laue < Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 3:26:54 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Homeless Crisis & Fire Hazards in the wash behind VRMS CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon Council Woman Alexander, First of all, thank you for your service to the City of Temecula. Temecula is amazing! As a resident of Temecula, I am very concerned for the people living in the among the dry brush and the wash behind Vail Ranch Middle School and in the overgrown wash that runs all the way down to in back off In-N-Out off of Temecula Parkway. I write to you because I feel their important lives and the surrounding community that rents or pays pays property taxes deserve your attention more than your efforts you placed on a "sanctuary city" during the last city council meeting. I wonder if your passion could serve the city better if you problem solved: What can be done to reduce Temecula's homeless problem? What can be done to make sure more fires aren't started in the wash and jeopardize surrounding homes? These are both pressing city topics that we need the city council to address. Abortion is a State and Federal issue; not a local city issue. I appreciate your time and consideration. Respectfully, Stephanie Laue Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Waste Of Tax Payers Money From: Beverly Williams < Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 12:55:52 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.Qov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Waste Of Tax Payers Money CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I did not vote for you. When I read your resume of achievements I knew you and I would never see eye to eye on much. Your quest to be a leader would make you a one size fits all dictatorship style leader. You have five kids to boss around and now that's not enough. Why don't you take on some of the disadvantage children in the Foster care system. Then you can experience first hand what happens to unwanted child. Child raised without the financial equality your child were raised with. I would love to sign the recall because you possess more negative qualities then positive but the taxpayer deserves more for there money. May we endure two more years of your racist and homophobic beliefs after all we survived trump. Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Women's Rights From: David < Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 2:30 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Women's Rights CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Council Members, The fact you would even consider the madness purposed by Ms. Alexander is pathetic and unconscionable. To officially deny women the right to healthcare and reproductive rights is not only immoral but indefensible. Your charge is to represent all of the people of Temecula and to make our community better, more inclusive, and welcoming. Not to support the minority dogma of fundamentalist extremists. Please do you job! Respectively, David David McClendon Temecula Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:48 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Council meeting September 27th From: paul davies < Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 3:06 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.Pov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Council meeting September 27th CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Matt, Congratulations on being Temecula's mayor, I'm sure you have your heart in making this a better place for all of us to live. I will be out of town the week of September 27th when there is a council meeting talking about the aborton ban proposed by Temecula City Councilmember Jessica Alexander. My family and neighbors were furious that a far right wing religious extremist is trying to dictate how other people should live by trying to pass a vote through the city council meeting. This hot topic needs to be a vote by the people and not by the few in government. We Americans are not Iranians where religious extremists restrict people's freedom. In America, the church and state are supposed to be separate. I believe in women's rights and I don't want us to go down a slippery slope. Even my Catholic wife commented, we are going back in time to the 19th century. Please do the right thing, let the people make this decision about the abortion, not the government. In the meantime, a petition to recall Jessica Alexander is being processed. https•//www change org/p/temecula-city-council-recall-jessica-alexander-from-the-city-council Thank you and have a great day! Paul Davies A family of 6 and Temecula residence for 20.5 years. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Offer of Assistance From: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 5:37 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Offer of Assistance Joette Koelsch called to offer to CC Alexander assistance at the next City Council Meeting with pro -life support. I recommended she send an email to CC Alexander herself; however, Ms. Koelsch said her email doesn't work and was adamant that I send this message for her, and also insisted CC Alexander call as soon as possible. Caller ID: John Koelsch Stacey Brown Senior Office Specialist City of Temecula (951) 694-6413 stacev.brown @@TemeculaCA.gov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:48 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: You know -----Original Message ----- From: KAREN Doherty < Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2022 6:29 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: You know CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. So the first 20 yrs in Temecula was bliss , was so proud of my city, bragged about it to my OC friends BUT the last 6 yrs, oh vey! ( coincidental?) When we moved here in 1996 1 figured pretty quick I was surrounded by conservatives. It didn't seem to matter tho ...the city council at that time never showed any bias , what they did , they did for the good of the community ( the quarry fight for one ) so it was great.... But now ! it seems you CC people are just in there for your political agenda. Especially that JA. is this what small town ( yes we are still small potatoes , I'm from L.A) is suppose to be all about ? pushing this right wing woman's non pro choice agenda down our throats ?? Please ! you are not doing yourselves any favors with most folks, whether they admit it or not Enough already ! Thank you for your time. Have a nice day PS can we do anything about the out of control barking dogs in this city ?? Animal friends need help K Andrews Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:47 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Phone Message from Valarie Avalos From: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 11:46 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov>; Cassandra Tabares<cassandra.tabares@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Phone Message from Valarie Avalos Good afternoon, I just received a phone message from resident Valarie Avalos asking I relay her message to all City Council about her opposition to the proposed abortion ban at the next Council Meeting. She wants you to know she feels this is not an issue for the City to take away women rights that California has given them and is not representative of all decisions of residents. Religion should not be up to Council Member Alexander to impose on them. If a woman wants to have an abortion that should be left up to the individual and not up to Jessica Alexander. Specifically Ms. Avalos wants to let Council Member Alexaner know that she does not speak for all of "us and her beliefs and she should not be enforcing her religious belief on us." Caller: Valarie Avalos Luisa Tovar Executive Assistant City of Temecula (951)694-6416 luisa.tovar cDtemeculaca.gov 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 A�}} r Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:46 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Council Agenda Items, see below From: Julie Torres Zuanich < Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 12:59 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.sov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.p,ov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Council Agenda Items, see below CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. September 22, 2022 Dear Mayor and Council members, My family moved to Temecula 3 years ago, because we thought it would be a nice city to live as we had visited many times and always enjoyed it here. We looked forward to learning all that Temecula has to offer. Unfortunately, we were delayed in exploring our new community, because this is when the World Pandemic hit. Life has moved along and we got to know our neighbors and find them to be kind and inclusive humans. So, it was surprising to have family members and friends mention that Temecula does not seem inclusive. I asked why they would say such a thing and they shared this article from the LA Times: https://www.latimes.com/california/storV/2022-09-15/`abortion-ban-temecula-sanctuary- citV After reading this article, we are concerned that this council member is using a civic position as a pulpit for personal views. In my opinion these views do not serve or represent the entire community. It seems that investing in the marketing for the City of Temecula as "Live Glass Full" is a positive marketing strategy, which implies that the city is welcoming, inclusive, and wants people to come, enjoy life and have fun. This positive strategy brings tourism and helps the community as a whole. This is what you want the City of Temecula to be known for, correct? We assured our family and friends that this article only represents the views of one council member and not the community. The purpose of my letter is to inform you as a member of the community that my family does NOT support making Temecula a Sanctuary City as requested by this council member. We would like to see council members working on items that directly improve the quality of life for people in the community. One item that we have been struggling with since moving to Temecula is the limited internet available to us. I respectfully request council members to add the following topic to the agenda: Improve infrastructure to allow competitive internet services to the rural parts of Temecula, specifically the Wine Country (92592). Due to the lack of infrastructure there is not a competitive environment for internet providers and therefore residents are victims of price gouging by the few providers. Companies such as Frontier Communications have a monopoly in this area. There has been a complaint filed with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) against them, which you can read here: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/05/ftc-takes-action-against-frontier-lying-about- internet-speeds-ripping-customers-who-paid-high-speed This has not helped this situation as Frontier continues to price gouge. An example of the price gouging, my family is being charged $75.00 monthly for 10 to 12 Mbps (megabits per second), where residents in other areas of Temecula are paying $39.99 for 500 Mbps, yes you read that correctly the difference in internet is 12 Mbps to 500 Mbps. If you break down the unit price for Mbps, we should be paying under $15.00, it's astonishing that Frontier is getting away with this! This would be like paying the price of a gallon of milk for a cup of milk. We recently reached out to the CEO of Frontier, Nick Jeffery, with our concern and his representative said they could reduce our bill by $10.00 for 1 year, meaning we would be paying $65.00 for 12 Mbps, this is still price gouging. I don't think we should be charged more than $39.99 as other residents in the city are paying for 500 Mbps. We are in a rural part of the city not a third world country. I don't understand why this monopoly is allowed. If the companies can only provide a certain level of internet, because the actual cost of improving the infrastructure is out of reach, then they should be charging customers close to the actual Mbps customers are receiving. This is not a complicated concept. Having limited access to the internet affects emergency communications. During the last evacuation, due to the Fairview Fire in Hemet, our internet access was slow as we searched for updates on the evacuation notices and for hotels to stay at. So many systems are monitored on the internet; security systems, solar energy systems, air conditioning systems, health monitoring applications, and the telephone line is connected to the internet line. Therefore, having a reasonable amount of internet service is a necessity and not a luxury. We really need improved infrastructure in the rural areas of Temecula, and we are requesting that our council members give attention to this problem. Can you please inform me of any current projects to improve the infrastructure; and access to the internet in rural areas of Temecula? How can I monitor the progress of these projects, if any? If there is not any current projects, who else can I contact about this problem and the need for this project? Sincerely, Julie Zuanich Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:44 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed Agenda Item for Unborn Sanctuary City From: ctmassa < Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 8:09 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.eov> Subject: Proposed Agenda Item for Unborn Sanctuary City CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of our Temecula City Council, As I am not able to attend the September 27 council meeting in person, I am writing to address the agenda item regarding future agenda items. In particular, I am addressing Councilmember Alexander's proposal to discuss making Temecula a Sanctuary City for unborn life. I'm not going to launch into a diatribe about a woman's right to reproductive choice, as that's not what this agenda item is about. As I understand it, you are discussing if you should discuss it in the future. The answer is a simple no. A woman's right to reproductive choice is protected under CA state law, and therefore, is not within the council's purview for discussion. Regardless of where you stand on the matter of reproductive choice, this isn't part of your responsibilities as Temecula City Council, and I request that you not entertain this agenda item on that principle alone. Refer to the recent San Clemente City Council meeting that Alexander is so blatantly ripping off - they've already given you the playbook on why this discussion is unnecessary. This is yet another headline -grabbing tactic by Councilmember Alexander to draw attention to two things: • Her faith, which has no place in matters of city government. Her employment at Birth Choice, which presents an immediate conflict of interest. Unfortunately these headline -grabbing tactics once again bring shame and embarrassment to our town. At work, I hear comments like, "I see Temecula made national news again" and it was for some display or racism, homophobia, or misogyny, usually perpetrated by Councilmember Alexander, and the church members whose opinions she is parroting and whose scripts she is reading. I am sure that our much -needed tourism business is suffering due the reputation our town is receiving nationally. I know we are so much more than what she represents. Mayor Rahn, Mayor Pro-tem Schwank, and Councilmembers Edwards and Stewart, aren't you just so tired of these time -wasting tactics and damage control efforts you must constantly withstand? Please put an end to this now by not entertaining this proposed agenda item any further. Do not indulge in discussion; do not give it any air. If you'd like to discuss making Temecula a "Sanctuary City" for anything, let's have it be something positive. Here are some ideas for future Sanctuary City agenda items: • Inclusion. • Love. • Dogs that get carted around in strollers (I don't understand this, but we seem to have a lot of • them here, and they don't hurt anybody). • Being decent human beings. Thank you for your time, Christine Massa Temecula resident since 2003 Proud mom of Chaparral Pumas (2022, 2024, 2026) Catholic Mother of Daughters 2 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:43 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: -----Original Message ----- From: Jeremy -Christie Anderson < Sent: Friday, September 23, 2022 5:15 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Rahn, My wife and I would like to clearly voice our support for council member Jessica Alexander's abortion ban resolution. As you know the Superman Court returned this decision to the states. Just this afternoon Arizona has essentially banned all abortions, along with several other states. Americans, along with the citizens of the world, overwhelming do not support abortion. You have a unique opportunity to protect the unborn with your vote. Thank you, Jeremy and Christine Anderson Crowne Hill, Temecula Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:42 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion agenda From: Melanie Roth < Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2022 7:19 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion agenda CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear council member, I read in the LA Times about an abortion ban that you have proposed for the city of Temecula. This proposal is outlandish and quite frankly, a personal soapbox issue you hold. I also believe it is a conflict of interest item for you, as your business will benefit by the passing of this proposal. It is not the duty of the Temecula city council to pass resolutions that are against state law. I urge you to vote down this asinine resolution and carry on with worthy city business. Thank you for your time and consideration. Melanie Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:41 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Opposition to Proposed Citywide Abortion Ban From: Jeff Wittek < Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2022 10:09 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.eov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Kevin Hawkins <kevin.hawkins@temeculaca.gov>; Luke Watson <luke.watson@temeculaca.gov>; Betsy Lowrey <betsy.lowrev@temeculaca.gov>; Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Opposition to Proposed Citywide Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning Temecula City Council Members, As a followup to our 16Sep22 email, in which we expressed STRONG OPPOSITION to the proposed citywide ban on abortions, we offer the following final throughts; First and foremost, the Temecula City Government is not a theocracy and was not created to allow any group or individual to impose their religious beliefs/views on others. Second, while Christian Nationalists (like Jessica Alexander) are often quite vocal in expressing their anti -abortion views, these views are actually held by a minority of people. Pew Research (a highly respected, non -partisan, fact -based American think tank) reported in July 2022 (link below) that "62% of Americans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases". https:l/www. pewresearch. oralpoliticsl2022/07/06/majority-of-public-disapproves-of-supreme-courts-decision-to- overturn-roe-v-wade/#americans-views-of-abortion In closing, we once again strongly encourage Temecula City Council Members to REJECT the citywide ban on abortions proposed by Jessica Alexander and to not involve our City in political theatre. Regards, Jeffrey A. & CindySue Wittek Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:45 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Jessica Alexander From: layla k < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 10:15 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: re: Jessica Alexander CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern: I am writing in an attempt to express my concern over having councilwoman Jessica Alexander be a representative of Temecula Valley. A quick google search of her name and we are met with headlines associated with articles addressing her homophobia, a petition to have her repealed, her want of barring access to healthcare for women (even when it is a protected right in the states constitution), and her own realization that she is unable to separate her religious beliefs from her daily job. I don't believe this is the kind of publicity Temecula needs or wants. I have lived in Temecula Valley for over 20 years and I cannot believe I have to speak up for my own rights in this city. I will not stand to allow what Jessica Alexander may believe is "right" according to her bible. I could not care any less. I stand for what is written in our states constitution, and the Attorney General has every right to pursue legal actions - which in turn, will hurt Temecula taxpayers like myself. Not to mention the negative outpour of feedback on the LA times publication with hundreds of comments saying people will no longer come to Temecula Wine Country over this ludicrous person that is representing our Valley. As someone who works in our tourism industry, this will vastly negatively affect our economy. I look forward to the end of her term, and electing someone who stands for the laws in this beautiful state we are so lucky to live in. Best Regards, Layla S. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:45 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula City Council Meeting 9/27/22 From: Terilee < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 12:46 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Terilee < Subject: Temecula City Council Meeting 9/27/22 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and Council Members: The topic of legal abortion in the state of California has no place on the City Council's agenda. This is a decision between a woman and her physician, not between a woman and the city council members. Abortion needs to remain safe, legal and accessible in this city. I urge you to REMOVE this resolution proposal from further consideration. Sincerely, Terilee Hammett Temecula, CA Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:44 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comments -----Original Message ----- From: Amrie Weiss, RD < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 12:50 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Randi, I'd like to submit a public comment in regard to Jessica Alexander's intention to propose the topic of Temecula as a sanctuary city for abortions. Her involvement with Tim Thompson and 412 Church is influencing her ability to honor the oath she took as a city council member. Extremist religious beliefs do not belong in our local decisions, and we surely don't need someone wasting resources on an issue that is protected at the state level. Ms. Alexander's commentary is causing harm to many Temecula citizens. When abortions are banned, they don't stop happening. Instead, there is an increase in unsafe abortions, PTSD, postpartum depression, and more. This particularly affects BIPOC women, people that Ms. Alexander has shown no regard for in previous comments she has made, such as referring to herself as Rosa Parks because she was asked to wear a mask to protect fellow community members. Please, City Council members, do not allow this conversation on banning abortion in Temecula to take up any more time in your meetings. Women have already been given the right by the state of California to make decisions about their own bodies. A human right that should not be threatened. Trying to pass any sort of local legislation on this will only be a waste of resources. Thank you, Amrie DeFrates Temecula Resident Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:44 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proclamation to Banning Abortion From: Latina Association < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 1:08 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann.Edwards@temecula.gov; James.Stewart@temecula.gov; Jessica.Alexander@temecula.gov; Randi Johl <randi Johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proclamation to Banning Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. September 25, 2022 Mayor Matt Rahn, Mayor Pro Tem Zak Schwant, Councilmembers M. Edwards, J. Stewart, and J. Alexander. RE: Temecula Proclamation to Banning Abortion. The law undoubtedly concludes that Councilwoman J. Alexander attempt to elicit your support to ban abortion in our city is a violation to "The Establishment Clause" When she is using time and again a public non -partisan city council position to imposing her personal faith and dogmatic doctrines using our tax funds; this council must take a stand rejecting her personal agenda. Jessica Alexander is becoming a financial liability exposing our city to legal confrontations in which not a red cent will come from her income, but we the Temecula residents will have to pay. You cannot support the use of public funding for religious indoctrinations for the benefit of a council member with "dilutional savior complex." Let me end stating that denying the right to choose is using religion to execute violence against women. Mayor Rahn, Mayor Pro Tem Shwank, and council members I urged you to reject the proposition. In unity for a safe and healthy community, Martha A. Howard Martha Angelica Howard Latina Association Riverside County, President 2021 Bosworth Award 75th Assembly District LULAC Council 3190 Member Former Temecula City Council District 5 Candidate Temecula Woman of the Year NAACP-W.I.N. Latina Association Riverside County "To make a difference through engaging in public policy, education, and culture affirmation. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Latina-Association-of-Riverside-County/209501775871863 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:44 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comment on Proposed "Sanctuary City for the Unborn" -----Original Message ----- From: Jessamine Walker < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 6:08 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment on Proposed "Sanctuary City for the Unborn" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. During the last council meeting Jessica Alexander proposed that Temecula adopt a resolution in favor of becoming a "sanctuary city for the unborn". While she did not elaborate on any specific details, the agenda seems clear. The proposal is designed to make reproductive choice as difficult as possible within the city while intentionally provoking public outcry in order to gain political capital on her part. This is NOT the role of our city government. Reproductive freedom is enshrined in our state legislation. Those of us who live here do not intend our city government to waste valuable time and resources with useless grand standing or political division. This resolution would undoubtedly lead to costly litigation with the state. A complete waste of tax dollars! As a resident, business owner, and mother of two teens in TVUSD I urge the city council to shut down this proposal and any similar to it. I further urge you to find Jessica Alexander unfit for any role in local city government. Jessamine Walker Sent from my iPhone Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:40 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: counsel woman Alexander's abortion ban From: Sarah Peyton < Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2022 10:56 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: counsel woman Alexander's abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I am writing again since I did not get any receipt or response that you received my concern. I would like to add a bit more information about myself. My husband and I have lived in Temecula and have been homeowners here since 2012. We have 3 children, all daughters, one of which is in the public school system in Temecula, and the other two will eventually follow. We have always planned on living in Temecula until our children are grown and flown, but if these extremist values keep being pushed on the citizens here, I feel we will have no choice but to abandon this city. We cannot in good conscience raise 3 daughters in a city that is actively trying to infringe on their healthcare rights and bodily autonomy. Once again, I ask you to speak out against this violation of state law and morality, and publicly denounce the proposition of a "sanctuary city" or any abortion regulations/bans. Thank you, Sarah Peyton ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Sarah Peyton < Date: Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 1:08 PM Subject: Re: counsel woman Alexander's abortion ban To: <matt.rahn@temeculaca.gov>, <zak.schwank@temeculaca.gov>,<iessica.alexander@temeculaca.gov>, <iames.stewart@temeculaca.gov>,<maryann.edwards@temeculaca.gov> Cc: <Council.Assistant@temeculaca.gov> I am writing to share my disgust with Counsel Woman Alexander's abortion ban proposal. My name is Sarah Peyton, I'm 36 years old and the mother to 3 daughters. I can assure you that after carrying and giving birth to 3 children I am very well aware of the gravity of the decision to bring children into this world. Everyone who can bear a child should have the choice to do so or not. A bundle of cells does not have more rights than the person carrying it. I implore you all to publicly strike down Council Woman Alexander's proposal and show that we care more about the people who live here than a fetus with no thoughts or feelings. Sarah Peyton Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:39 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City Item From: Lynn and Michael Kollar < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 8:14 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.Rov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.sov> Subject: Sanctuary City Item CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members, We wholeheartedly disagree with the idea Temecula should declare itself a "sanctuary city for the unborn" as Councilwoman Alexander has suggested. We strongly support every woman's right to pursue medical decisions for themselves and to not be treated as second class citizens. Councilwoman Alexander has the right to advocate for her beliefs, but neither she nor the City Council should force others to live by them. Lynn Kollar Mike Kollar Temecula, California Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:41 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comment for Tuesday's Council Meeting -- re Sanctuary City From: A Cox < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 8:42 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment for Tuesday's Council Meeting -- re Sanctuary City CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've lived in Temecula since 1999 and must speak up now regarding the illegal and illogical resolution by Council Member Alexander. Proposing a "sanctuary city for the unborn" is fundamentally incompatible with our society as a whole on all moral and ethical grounds. I am disgusted that someone newly elected to power in our city is so uneducated about the law. She is ignorant of the Health and Safety Code which is a subset of the California Constitution. In 1981, the California Supreme Court held that "all women in this state rich and poor alike possess a fundamental constitutional right to choose whether or not to bear a child." (Comm. to Defend Reprod. Rights v. Myers (1981) 29 Ca1.3d 252, 262). Consistent with this precedent, the Legislature enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which codified a woman's fundamental right to procreative choice (Health & Saf. Code, § 123462). To that end, the Legislature forbid the state "and every county, city, town and municipal corporation" in the state from interfering with a woman's right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 123464 subd. (c), 123466; see also Missionary Guadalupanas of Holy Spirit Inv. v. Rouillard (2019) 38CalApp.5th 421, 435 [abortions are a "basic health care service" and must be covered by health plans].) Those who violate established laws designed to protect vulnerable people should and will be stopped, and their personal bigotry and irrational fears are not to be respected. Instead, our Council should focus on the struggles (homelessness, poverty, public transit, etc.) now in our community. A. L. Cox Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:23 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula is not a "City of Life Sanctuary" From: Camaray Davalos < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:56 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula is not a "City of Life Sanctuary" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please submit this for public comment. Thank you. Dear Temecula City Council Members, I write you as a descendant of the original people of this land, a Pay6mkawish woman from Pechanga. I will get right to the point. Our people believe that life begins at the first breath, so the moment a baby comes out of the womb, and makes their first cries, they are alive. Not anytime before, while in the womb. If you disagree with me based on your religious or cultural beliefs, that's fine. However, I ask that you give me and countless others who feel the same way, the same respect that we allow you to have based on your own beliefs, therefore maintaining the clear separation of church and state. Christianity is not the only religion around here, and it definitely is not the original religion or way of thinking of this land, as my people can attest to. We have already suffered the impacts of colonization and the traumas that Christiantiy has brought to the land and our people; To affirm this foreign religious dogma on our land is frankly re -traumatizing. This is why I cannot in good conscience support the recommendation to make Temecula, Indigenous Pay6mkawish land, a "City of Life Sanctuary". Furthermore, the negative impact to businesses should this resolution pass could be absolutely detrimental. People have already commented that they will boycott the city and wineries, and I assume they would also boycott the casino, all of which support thousands of our residents. We cannot let this resolution negatively impact the livelihood of our residents who have already suffered so much due to the pandemic. This is also clearly a conflict of interest as Jessica Alexander is privately employed with Birth Choice. Further, reproductive choice in California is still legal. It is a highly private matter between a pregnant person and their medical professional, not Temecula's City Council. This is why I strongly oppose the resolution to make Temecula a City of Life Sanctuary. Thank you for your time. With strength, Camaray Davalos Camaray Davalos Editor/Literary PR Great Oak Press ( repress 2pechanga ov Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:22 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: opposed to resolution requested by Alexander From: Paisley Cato < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:11 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: opposed to resolution requested by Alexander CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Randi.iohl@temeculaca.gov Matt.Rahn@temeculaca.gov Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov Marvann.Edwards@temeculaca.eov James.Stewart@temeculaca.gov Jessica.Alexander@temeculaca.gov RE: "Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn (At the Request of Council Member Alexander)" As a citizen of Temecula for the last 26 years, I adamantly oppose any effort by the city council to adopt the resolution presented by Council Member Alexander. It would be irresponsible to adopt a resolution that is in direct conflict with the state of California's laws to ensure a right to access abortion as such action would predictably open up the city for legal action and lawsuits. It would be inappropriate to adopt such a resolution as it does NOT reflect the opinion of the majority of citizens in the city, who instead support the state's status as a reproductive freedom state. It would be inappropriate to support the resolution as it reflects a personal religious opinion of a councilmember, and might possibly even be considered a conflict of interest as the resolution appears to promote the services of an organization that she is personally involved with. As noted in the letter from the Attorney General's office, the California Supreme Court held that "all women in this state rich and poor alike possess a fundamental constitutional right to choose whether or not to bear a child." The city of Temecula should not promote any stance contrary to that legal finding. Respectfully, Paisley S Cato Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:22 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city for the Unborn -----Original Message ----- From: David Pjontek < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 11:22 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city for the Unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Matt We are residents in district 1 of Temecula, , 92592. We support Jessica Alexander petition for the unborn. David and Catherine Pjontek Sent from my iPad Randi Johl From: Council Comments Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 3:10 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: For public comment -----Original Message ----- From: Becca Spence Dobias < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 12:43 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: For public comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Entertaining this "sanctuary city" resolution is emboldening extremists. Anyone who thinks otherwise should look into this group's propaganda. Their ideology glorifies end times, which they are eager to hasten by encouraging conflict and strife. Please stand up against their efforts to make others' lives worse and help keep California an actual sanctuary for those in need. Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:25 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comment on Temecula Proclamation to Ban Abortion From: Latina Association < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 1:23 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment on Temecula Proclamation to Ban Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. September 26, 2022 Mayor Matt Rahn, and Councilmembers, Regarding Temecula Proclamation to Banning Abortion, the law undoubtedly concludes that Councilwoman J. Alexander attempting to elicit your support to ban abortion in our city is a violation to "The Establishment Clause." She is using (time and again) our tax funds abusing a public non -partisan city council position to impose her personal faith and dogmatic doctrines. This council must take a stand rejecting her personal agenda. Jessica Alexander is becoming a financial liability exposing our city to legal confrontations in which not a red cent will come from her income, but we Temecula residents will have to pay. You cannot support the use of public funding for religious indoctrinations for the benefit of a council member with "dilutional savior complex." Let me end stating that denying the right to choose is using religion to execute violence against women. Mayor Rahn, Mayor Pro Tem Schwank, and council members it's well known that "what's predictable is preventable" that's why I urged you to reject the proposition thus preventing further social unrest, division, and bankrupting our city. In unity for a safe and healthy community, Martha Angelica Howard Latina Association Riverside County, President 2021 Bosworth Award 75th Assembly District LULAC Council 3190 Member Former Temecula City Council District 5 Candidate Temecula Woman of the Year NAACP-W.I.N. Latina Association Riverside County "To make a difference through engaging in public policy, education, and culture affirmation. " https://www.facebook.com/pages/Latina-Association-of-Riverside-County/209501775871863 Randi Johl From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 2:41 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposing to ban abortions city wide in Temecula From: Robin Taylor < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 2:13 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.eov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposing to ban abortions city wide in Temecula CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jessica and all council members, If you think for a minute that this city council has the right to control a woman's body it tells me what kind of city council member you are. Then let's make male masturbation illegal while you are at it! I didn't realize I lived in Gilead wannabe town but I will make sure this doesn't happen. And many of you call yourself christians... what a joke killing and harassing people in the name of God. IF YOU LIVED BY THE GOLDEN RULE you'd know in your heart what you are trying to do is wrong, at the misdirection of the KKK white male that has been afraid of the White Woman ending the race. You want to keep people of color pregnant so the United States has a workforce they control. Ever since E-verify started making this country legal you switched up and now no longer want a workforce from outside the US, but you are attempting to control from within by people like you on our city council Your type of thinking needs to go and is not welcome in this town or any town in the United States of America! Robin Taylor Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Against proposal for sanctuary city for pro life From: S Trapp < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 5:41 PM To: Maryann Edwards<Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Against proposal for sanctuary city for pro life CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council member Edwards: It is upsetting as a 15 plus year homeowner that I have to waste my time to make sure that your rogue colleague keeps going against the majority residents in things that are essential to good governance. Councilmember Alexander keeps putting this city in a negative light and ridicule . Via state law and the Supreme Court recent decision on ABORTION , Abortion decisions will be decided by the individual state. Our state and Governor has decided that we are pro choice. MS . ALEXANDER Religious views are also abhorrent since she is a public servant and ger personal religious views should never influence her public decision that effects all city residents. I am hoping you have the courage to follow San Clemente's city council and make this a non endorsement for the city. Regards, Mr. Stephen Trapp Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:45 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Tearing Down the (Years in the making) Positve Branding of Temecula From: Brynley Lee < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 5:52 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Tearing Down the (Years in the making) Positve Branding of Temecula CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Clerk Ms. Johl. I sent the following letter tonight to each council member and would like it to be read into the record for tomorrow's Council meeting (Tuesday, September 27, 2022). Thank you. Dear Council Member (all). On behalf of the four voting, adult constituents of our City of Temecula home, I write to express our outrage, once again, at Council Member Jessica Alexander's vain, attention -seeking attempts to tarnish the positive branding image of our city by pushing for the Council to vote to declare our City an anti abortion sanctuary. Such absurd, wasteful folly, if enacted, would lose our Council all credibility with their constituents and the general public at large, would invite unwanted negative publicity upon our City and would (perhaps rightly) portray Temecula as a place overrun by zealots who do not serve the public good but instead only serve the narrow, self-serving and self-aggrandizing agendas of a small group of extremists. You already know that such an act would instantly put our city in direct confrontation with California law and would invite an immediate lawsuit against the city by the State - which, if this vote succeeds, we in this household would support as a check on an out -of -touch and out -of -control activist Council trying to inappropriately use public resources to extra -judiciously take away citizens' rights granted them in law. Vast majorities of the populace of this state, country and dare we also say, this City, do not want to see a woman's right to choose taken away. Recklessly inviting this costly, misguided fight (that the City would surely lose) cannot be justified from the perspective of your duty to protect the City from harm and to exercise fiduciary responsibility in carrying out your sworn duties to protect the laws of the State. What value could be derived from the avalanche of negative publicity that would surely follow such a vote?I? Is that how you want your legacy in public service to be defined? Many of you have worked tirelessly over the years to help build Temecula's image and brand as a popular destination and a positive place for people to visit and live. Voting in favor of this motion puts all of that in jeopardy. It's probable that many visitors and potential new residents would decide to avoid Temecula - not wanting to contribute to a place overrun by zealots. This could directly impact the City's tax revenues. Don't get caught now on the wrong side of that history by contributing to an effort to destroy that (decades in the making) image and damage that lucrative brand, perhaps irreparably, by caving in to extremists. Think twice about what you want Temecula to be known for, and what you don't want it to be known for. Think twice about how you want to be remembered in that conversation. We respectfully ask that you do what's the most right for the most people and ensure that this reactionary, brand - damaging folly ends in defeat. Let's keep Temecula being viewed positively by visitors and residents alike. Say no to imposing reckless, self-inflicted damage to our brand! Thank you. Best Regards, Brynley Lee Leni Lee Caherine Angel Olivia Lee From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:43 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: No to Resolution Re Temecula's Unborn From: Aaron Cook < Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 10:02 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.eov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: No to Resolution Re Temecula's Unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Members of the City Council, I'm a resident of Temecula and am concerned about the recent proposal for a resolution declaring Temecula a sanctuary city for Temecula's unborn. Abortion is a polarizing issue with reasonable arguments on both sides. While I'm personally opposed to abortion, I recognize the challenging and nuanced situations others may find themselves in, and believe they should have the right to make decisions based on personalized medical and spiritual advice. I applaud the people who spoke out in support of the birth choice center in the last council meeting and the work they do. However, the leap from offering beneficial services to restricting others choices is an overstep. Regardless of the arguments for or against abortion, I also don't believe it is appropriate for the city to be involved in this issue. I'm concerned it would bring negative attention and expose the city to unnecessary lawsuits that will cost residents money. Please keep the focus on the business of the city. Thank you for your service to our community. I'm sure your time spent on the council is under appreciated. Overall I'm very happy with the quality of services in the city and hope that continues while staying out of partisan culture war issues. Sincerely, Aaron From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:43 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City -----Original Message ----- From: Therese Buckles < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:02 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Matt Rahn: I am adamantly against Temecula becoming a sanctuary city!!! Citizen of Temecula since 1989. Sincerely, Therese buckles Sent from my Whone From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:40 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Intended proposal at 9-27 council meeting. From: Jennifer Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:10 AM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Intended proposal at 9-27 council meeting. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Members of the city council, I am writing to you today due to the proposal being pushed by Mrs. Alexander. While I respect her conviction to her faith, I can not respect that this conviction comes with a misuse of her position to push this belief on those of us who do not follow it. What Mrs. Alexander is proposing is not only illegal but it with far outside of the scope of her position in city council and shows yet again her lack of respect for her position. It is a proposal that could have dangerous and harmful affects on many. Mrs. Alexander will not end abortion in this city, she would only end safe abortions. And if all lives truly matter, than the lives of those should matter too. I have a petition that in just a few days has garnered over 200 local signatures. This petition is of those who want to keep abortions safe in Temecula. While I realize there is no legal standing to this petition i believe it shows there are many who do not support this proposal. With this I ask that not only do you vote against this illegal proposal, but that you also censure Mrs. Alexander for constantly going against her position on the council and the waste in tax payer funds she has used to promote her religious agendas. Thank you, Jenn Reeves Help your petition be successful. X See what you can do now Dashboard Petition details Edit Comments 111K !. { �MY P.iND � r MY BODY Keep Abortion Safe in Temecula Ca 203 have signed. Let's get to 500! At 500 signatures, this petition is mo e likely to be featured in recommendations! 2 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:38 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city for life. -----Original Message ----- From: Chuck Colburn < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:30 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city for life. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I want you to know that a Life Group from North Coast Church meets in our home every Tuesday night. We will devote the beginning of our time together tonight to pray for you and this vital decision that must be made in our fine city. Thank you so much for your service to our community. Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:24 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Reading Item 11 for 9/27 City Council Meeting From: Lloyd Mize < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:22 AM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Reading Item 11 for 9/27 City Council Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Request: Please read my comments tonight during public comments for item 11, resolution declaring Temecula a sanctuary city for unborn babies, "Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn" Temecula City Council Members, Staff and Citizens of Temecula: Local control of our city that represents, most of our citizens verses mandates that come from the State Government is important, and our legal constitutional right. An opportunity we have, as a City, is to proclaim we are the voice of the "Unborn", "Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn". Psalm 127 says, "Unless the Lord protects a city, guarding it with sentries will do no good." Who will speak for the unborn whose lives are threatened by the State Government of California, who says to the Unborn, "The State of California will make it easy to have your life ended, even after you are born, by disallowing investigations into the cause of the death of newborn babies in California." AB-2223. The State is aggressively letting the rest of our nation know, "if you are a mother of an "Unborn" and your state will not will not allow you to have an abortion, come to California, we will pay for you to come and have an abortion, with our citizens tax dollars. " AB 1666 Who will be the voice of the "Unborn"? Since the 1970's over 64,000,000 American lives have been taken, aborted, killed. These lives have been given life by God. They have souls, heart beats and feelings. We are at a turning point in our culture. Who will represent those of us who Believe God, The Holy and Sovereign God of all creation. He has created all and is Sovereign over all. He Blesses and He takes away. He has a great plan for all Creation. He has given us His written, infallible & inerrant Word. It has been proven in history and prophecy. He has a plan for all of us, including the unborn and the 64,000,000 lives that have been taken. Some of our citizens do not believe in God and there are those that do believe and will not submit to Him and keep His ways. That's okay. Those of us that lift Him up and take a stand to lift Him up in our community, we encourage others to see Him and receive Him and His Love and our love. We are called to love all and not judge. He will do the judging. Regarding being a voice for the "Unborn", This is about encouraging mothers and fathers of the "Unborn" to give their "Unborn" children, a healthy and abundant life outside of the womb. Give them the choice of life outside the womb. This is not about "anti -abortion" or a mother's right to choose. It is about being a voice for the "Unborn" that says don't take my life, give me life outside the womb, please do not take my life in vain. This is the Proclamation, let's let the world know the City of Temecula, above all else, is the voice for the "Unborn". With the Election coming in November this is awkward for some that are in "elected public seats" because of opposition that says it is not for the City to have such a proclamation, and they will speak against you if you make such a proclamation. There are more of us that will stand with those that have the boldness and courage to be the voice of the "Unborn", than those that oppose God, His creation and right to protect life, the "Unborn". God will bless those that keep His ways, honor Him and be the voice for those who do not have a voice. Let's be the Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn. God Calls us to have no fear, to be bold and courageous and to keep and mediate on His Word. Joshua 1:8-9 "Study this Book of Instruction continually. Meditate on it day and night so you will be sure to obey everything written in it. Only then will you prosper and succeed in all you do. This is my command —be strong and courageous! Do not be afraid or discouraged. For the Lord your God is with you wherever you go. " Be the Voice and Provide for those with no voice or means Luke 4:18-19 "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he has anointed me to bring Good News to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim that captives will be released, that the blind will see, that the oppressed will be set free, and that the time of the Lord's favor has come. " Luke 4:18-19 Lloyd Mize Coldwell Banker Temecula Broker Assoicate DRE 00640092 Since 1978 COLDWELL BANKER REALTY From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:31 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Opposition to Council Agenda Item Sept. 27, 2022 From: * Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:24 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Opposition to Council Agenda Item Sept. 27, 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The misguided attempt by Council Member Jessica Anderson to have Temecula declared "a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn" is not an appropriate subject for consideration by our City Council. It is a conservative idea displaying the ideology of this particular Council Member, and should receive no further attention by the Council. Further, the California Attorney General has clearly presented the State's position on the matter; if it is pursued further, the City will likely face indeterminate legal expenses in attempting to defend against action by the State. Please let this matter drop without further consideration. Thank you John B. Rogers Temecula CA 92591-4970 ( Council District Four From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:35 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Council - do not share my email or name From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10:32 AM To: Council Comments <CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Re: Council - do not share my email or name CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ok no problem - I want it read Brigitte -----Original Message ----- From: Council Comments <CouncilComments(o)-TemeculaCA.gov> To: ' Sent: Tue, Sep 27, 2022 10:22 am Subject: RE: Council - do not share my email or name Please note that comments to Council are public record. While names are public record, personal email addresses and phone numbers are redacted and confidential. Given your request for confidentiality, we will not process the comment as a further public record unless you indicate otherwise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC, CDE Legislative Director / City Clerk (951) 694-6421 randi.johl6Zi)temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 10.16 AM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments(aD_TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Council - do not share my email or name CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. There are many choices as to a woman's body reproduction system. IG\R:'. There are many options for women not to use an abortion as an option. Pills, IUD's etc. Why would anyone even consider an abortion in these modern times - Keep the email private please ! I do not want to reveal my name - Because my dear mother suffered all her life and had several abortions due to the fact these options were not available and during the WW!! She had several abortions because she had no food or milk or any type of nutrition and many women during these horrible times suffered and it is a known fact women never forget ! A fetus is a human being and it is Murder to kill. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:36 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: September 27 Temecula City Council Comments ... Re: A. Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:08 AM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ram irez@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; REDI Commission <REDICommission@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: September 27 Temecula City Council Comments ... Re: A. Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn (At the Request of Council Member Alexander) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Temecula City Council, Temecula can and should promote the protection of innocent unborn life. Such an endeavor could easily include the promotion and recognition of parenthood and the support of non -government organizations helping mothers and families keep their unborn babies to term. On another note and in a broader sense ... in now post Roe v. Wade America, it should be imperative that innocent unborn babies receive some amount of the due process rights that even convicted murderers routinely get while decades waiting on death row. Is it so out of the question to endow even a fraction of the due process guaranteed to a condemned vicious murderer, during an innocent baby's first nine months inside of his or her mother's womb? The Left routinely harps on the 3/5ths compromise in the original US Constitution. How about an unborn baby qualifying for even 3/5ths of the rights that a serial killer enjoys while locked up on death row? At this point even 3/5ths is better than none. Some reasonable due process should not be that great or impossible to guarantee. In the meantime, science clearly demonstrates that the unborn are not merely a clump of cells, or something akin to a tumor, as the pro -abortion left would have us believe. 1 Baby elephant in utero, not a clump of cells; courtesy of National Geographic Baby dolphin in utero, not a tumor; courtesy of National Geographic Baby cheetah in utero, let's keep this one; courtesy of National Geographic z Baby polar bears in utero, not clumps of cells; courtesy of National Geographic Baby Chihuahua puppy in utero, man's best friend; courtesy of National Geographic i Baby human in utero, also worthy of life too; courtesy of National Geographic 3 Civil rights movements have always been about expanding the freedoms for those whom are worthy of life, dignity, and due process; from freed slaves to Native Americans, to women and other minorities, and now to the unborn. The late liberal free speech writer Nat Hentoff wrote that he was deeply influenced by Mary Meehan,_a fellow liberal and pro -life thinker by citing her and cited her quote: It is out of character for the left to neglect the weak and helpless. The traditional mark of the left has been its protection of the underdog, the weak and the poor. The unborn child is the most helpless form of humanity, even more in need of protection than the poor tenant farmer or the mental patient. The basic instinct of the left is to aid those who cannot aid themselves. And that instinct is absolutely sound. It's what keeps the human proposition going. The Left betrays itself by its dogmatic push for abortion on demand, even up to the moment of birth; and even heinously after birth. Their social utopian visions promote gas -lighting and coerced abortions, more akin to barbarous totalitarian regimes like Communist China. Their vision is inspired by racist eugenicists like Margaret Sanger whose ideas were readily adopted by totalitarian regimes in Europe almost a century ago. Perhaps in the wake of the Dobbs decision America has earned back a little piece of its soul. In this same vein, let's take this stand for our City of Temecula too. Sincerely, Rick Reiss Temecula, California P.S. I have Cc this to the City Council Members, Staff and Bcc this to various interested parties as well as media contacts. Sent from my Wad 4 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:38 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Resident Call regarding Abortion Sanctuary Recommendation From: Cassandra Tabares <cassandra.tabares@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:21 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov>; Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Resident Call regarding Abortion Sanctuary Recommendation Hello, We received a call from Paula Yeany, resident in District 2 who wanted to relay that she is begging for Council Members not to follow Jessica Alexander's recommendations regarding the abortion comments. She mentioned that this is not the Temecula she once lived in, and it is not the Temecula she wants to live in. She is a longtime resident and feels like it is absurd to suggest this and is shocked that is happing. No contact information was given. Cassandra Tabares Administrative Assistant City of Temecula (951) 694-6459 cassandra.tabares(&temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:53 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Introduction From: Jenny Adamo < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:30 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Re: Introduction CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor Rahn, I reached out last August after that infamous city council meeting that lasted into the wee hours of the morning. I felt awful after watching a pastor attack your personal beliefs and relationship to God/religion. And to do so in such a public forum, in front of your family, was more than just distasteful. So, you must understand my surprise when I saw that you are aligned with that same pastor and his church now. Last year I had no idea who you or Tim Thompson were. Now I have seen him in several forums and feel like he terrorizes this community with his "religious" grandiosity. He attended a school board meeting that I sit on and openly stated that he tells his congregation how to vote. While I still hold that your spiritual relationship is your personal choice, it is hard to look past that comment, how he spoke to you, and you now as sitting Mayor of our city linked to him and his church. I do not respect Tim's confrontational approach. I believe that he continues to divide our city in the name of "God". This is a time where we need to come together as a community more than ever, and he is a part of the problem, not the solution. I will close with this. Keep religion out of politics! Please remember that church only represents a portion of our community. There are others here with very different views and approaches and you represent us as well. Sincerely, Jenny Adamo From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:21 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Vote no on the city ban on abortion -----Original Message ----- From: C D < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:50 AM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Vote no on the city ban on abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I do not support our city banning abortion. I can not believe that this city would violate a woman's right to determine their life. In doing so I would suspect that many who would support this ban are also those that complain about child welfare programs and ignore the teens lingering in foster care. They are likely those that don't support child protection agencies with funding, and would rather mail individuals that ensure supportive services are provided. Furthermore, there is nothing done to Fathers who don't help care for these children once they are born. They are generally not held accountable. Make a decision not based on your personal religious or radical beliefs, but instead on facts. You can't say one thing and do another as every decision made impacts others. Furthermore, no one has the right to determine a woman's life, no one but her. Sincerely, Carla Dunn, MSW, PPS From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:20 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Let's Stand Together From: Natalie Potter < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:55 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Let's Stand Together CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Temecula City Council, Thank you so much for your service within the Temecula community. Your dedication and commitment are admirable as I know that this is in addition to your personal lives. As you know Temecula is taking steps to break out of the mold by introducing a sanctuary for life city. This too is admirable as you are looking to step out of the status quo and be different from surrounding agencies. Protecting the unborn is a responsibility, they are voiceless, and we as humans need to protect that voice. How we do this is to have resources for parents, for women and men that did not want to be pregnant like adoption, support that is needed for individual needs, parenting support, and necessities support. I encourage the council to continue to stand out and stand up for the voiceless. Natalie Potter From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:19 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Tonights City Council Meeting From: Rachel Bollin < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 11:59 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Tonights City Council Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Temecula City Council, This letter is in response to an item on your agenda created by Jessica Alexander in order to remove the right to privacy from the women and men of Temecula. I know that most of you on the council are quite aware of the insanity of this agenda item to make Temecula and anti choice city. I know that the majority of you are very clear that moving forward with this proposal will have a financially negative impact on our city that would harm the goals the city has created to improve the lives of our citizens. Not only will this movement create a law suit by the state's district attorney, it will also decrease tourism and make the city a less desirable place to live. Does the city of Temecula have millions to support a potential law suit? Would you not rather spend the money on what the citizens have actually been asking for? Think of the number of pickle ball courts you could put in or better yet, think of the 50 meter pool that we now have 1000 signatures for from citizens. I highly doubt creating massive lawsuits, along with lost tourism has the backing of your residents. The city council was not voted in to change laws and cause massive disruption. You were hired to increase the quality of life of the people you represent. I recommend the city council vote down this item and repremand the member who continually brings negative press to a flourishing city with great potential. Sincerely, Rachel Bollin From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:18 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Encouraging the members of this Beautiful Cuty and its Council Members From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 12:13 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Encouraging the members of this Beautiful Cuty and its Council Members CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello my name is Sonia Mir, I'm thanking you in advance for considering even if just on Calebdar, to make your City a Sanctuary City for Life. You will shine far and beyond, even abroad , sending the message that Life counts from the tiniest of all (in the womb), to those facing the end of years. I pray you do make this stand and affirm Life in your City. Eternity watches and Heavens will applaud you, as well as all of us living in surrounding cities. You will set the pattern to follow. Blaze stters! Thank you, Sonia Mir Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:19 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: public comment From: Julie Geary < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 12:15 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: public comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Why is Julie so critical of the 412 church, Tim Thomspon, and his affiliated candidates and office holders? You might have asked yourself this question. It's a valid question and it boils down to passion and principles. I am passionate about this country. I am passionate about our Constitution, our freedoms and our rights. They shall NOT be infringed and I will not watch them being trampled on. Tim Thompson tells Jessica Alexander what to think, what to say, and what to do. She is subservient to her pastor and puts him above all else. She puts him above the law, the constitution, and her community. Once again we are here because she is making a mockery of OUR city, and trying to use her privilege and power as a public official to promote her extremist religious ideology upon our city and take rights away from those that she is supposed to serve. This extremist thinking is seeping into our public governance. This thinking is incompatible with our laws in this country. We do not and should not write laws purview to only one particular viewpoint or belief system. Trying to ban abortion in the city violates the California Constitution where reproductive choices are protected and rights have been declared through legal precedence in case law. Why are we allowing an extremist religious thinking of ONE church to control our cities reputation, our legacy, and our future? Why hasn't our city attorney sanctioned and or censured Jessica for violating her oath to the constitution? Are we waiting for a huge lawsuit? Are we waiting for a member of the church to hurt someone? Why are we giving this conversation the light of day? Why wasn't she stopped the minute the words "Rosa Parks" fell out of her mouth? This extremist ideology has no home in Temecula. Jessica refused to learn about the history of our community and its indigenous roots when she refused to participate during the league of cities training. She refused to acknowledge our Igbtq community during the PRIDE month proclamation. She is also afraid about talking about racial inequality and wanted to remove the R in REDI. This is a similar narrative that churches had during Jim Crow (and not just in the south). Many Pastors and parishioners didn't want to desegregate churches, schools, sport teams, restaurants etc. They didn't want women going to college. They didn't want women taking birth control, and they didn't want women working. We hear the murmurings of this with 412 members calling to end drag brunch, when LGBT businesses receive threatening calls and have the health department come multiple times a month. We hear this when they want to ban certain books from our beloved Scholastic book fairs. When they want the district to fire LGBT teachers for having a picture of their family on their desk. We see them attacking people in our public restrooms for their precieved gender identity. What's going to happen next, a lynching? Why are we allowing the cruel, hurtful words and actions of Jessica and 412's Tim Thompson to be the conservation centered around our valley? As a city you have the power to put an end to this. Actions NEED consequences. Be proactive and take a stand for liberty and justice for ALL. You can put an end to this tonight by formally repremindeding or removing Jessica from office. From: Council Comments Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:16 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Make Abortion Accessible for Everyone From: Carmelita S < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 12:27 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Make Abortion Accessible for Everyone CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, Temecula should not be a "Sanctuary city for the unborn" quote unquote. Abortion should be accessible to EVERY person with a uterus. Making abortion inaccessible is a violation of human rights. Abortion should be provided for free to any person with a uterus that requests it. The rights of people with uteruses should be respected. Making Temecula a "Sanctuary City" quote unquote forces birth to those that do not want it, causes poor health outcomes for pregnant people, and exacerbates social inequalities to the most marginalized people. Get your act together Temecula. -Anonymous From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:18 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed resolution by Jessica Alexander -----Original Message ----- From: Cynthia Bustos < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 12:50 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposed resolution by Jessica Alexander CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon Council Members, My husband, Jorge and I are long time residents of Temecula. We have lived here since 1984 and participated in voting for the city's name and incorporation. We are so very proud of Temecula and what it has accomplished. We remember seeing the long term plans and it is jaw dropping to see the fruition of this plans to make such a beautiful city. We are extremely concerned about what councilwoman Jessica Alexander spoke of at the last meeting. She wishes to have Temecula become a non abortion haven. She is a member of the 412 church which is behind this measure. Everyone has a right to their religion and personal beliefs but we do have a constitution which demands separation of church and state. If this measure gets eventually approved, Temecula would no doubt be boycotted. People would choose to buy their cars elsewhere. They would not frequent our Old Town or Wine Country. We would lose so much credibility And money. The job of the city council as we know it is to ensure the safety of its citizens, provide local transportation, support local businesses etc. It most certainly is Not a position that engages in political circus. It does not concern itself with national political issues. Please keep it local folks. Keep our city one that everyone loves to live in and visit. Respectfully yours, Cynthia and Jorge Bustos From: Council Comments Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:16 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comment for September 27, 2022 From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 1:28 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Public Comment for September 27, 2022 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Councilmember Alexander has proposed that a Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn is considered by the Council. Ms. Alexander's proposal is a self -interested attempt to thwart the laws of the State of California and bolster her own conservative agenda while abridging the fundamental human rights of the women of Temecula. The right to a legal and safe abortion in California is unassailable and if passed, the California attorney general has made clear that Alexander's resolution will be immediately challenged and ultimately overturned by the state. Alexander's resolution will only serve to make Temecula a laughingstock with a growing reputation as a right-wing enclave that is on the wrong side of history. Although Alexander is selfishly willing to ignore the human rights of the women in her community and state mandates, I would hope that this City Council will do better and refuse to place this matter on any future Council agenda. Nkechi Odu District 2 Nkechi C. Odu Esq., Principal 131805 Temecula Parkway #720, Temecula, CA 92592 1 nkechi@odulaw.com I p: 951- 215-6212 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:17 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Jessica Alexander proposal From: Rhonda Williams < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 1:38 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Jessica Alexander proposal CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My email was returned due to my inputting the wrong email address. Please scroll below for my original message. Thank you Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Rhonda Williams < Date: September 27, 2022 at 12:52:55 PM PDT To: randi.iohl@temecula.Rov Subject: Jessica Alexander proposal I have been a resident of Temecula for 29 years. Like many others I moved here to give my family a safe an affordable place to live. Recently Jessica Alexander and the leadership at the 412 Church have decided to interject their opinions into our community and attempt to present them as the general consensus of the population in Temecula. Jessica Alexander has proposed that the city of Temecula become a "sanctuary city" for abortion, ultimately stating that the city of Temecula is "Pro -life" as a whole. I am not "pro abortion" but am absolutely and unhesitatingly Pro Choice. I do not believe that our government should interfere in a woman's right to make a choice concerning her body. I do not believe that anyone else should be involved in this very difficult choice other than a woman and her physician. As a community we need to provide education and resources and support to each other and especially to women who have had or will have to make this very difficult decision. I prefer Ms. Alexander and the 412 church do not attempt to use their voice to express the beliefs of an entire community. Ms Alexander herself has made it very clear that she does not support a woman's right to choose. She also is clearly not even pro life but for forced birth as she would not even wear a mask to protect others from a potentially dangerous infection. The great State of California has made a decision that We as a state will not take away a woman's right to choose. Ms Alexander does not get to state that our city will then not uphold the decision from our state. I am wholeheartedly against the proposal by Ms. Alexander to make Temecula an anti choice city. I am also appalled at how the first amendment to our constitution is clearly skipped over by Ms Alexander and the 412 church - the separation of church and state must be upheld. Rhonda Williams Temecula Resident since 1993 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:17 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed City of Life Resolution From: mnmusn < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 1:44 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <zakschwank@gmail.com>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Proposed City of Life Resolution CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing to express my disgust at the continuous grandstanding by Jessica Alexander and attempts to insert her religious views into the City of Temecula's government. "Government shall make no establishment of religion", is a tenant of our founding documents. As the manager of Birth Choice she has a clear conflict of interest in attempting to impose the, "City of Life Sanctuary" resolution on the residents of this area. I am curious, if a gun shop owner is elected to city council, will the council entertain that shop owner proposing a "mandatory gun ownership" resolution? As ridiculous as that sounds, so does Jessica's latest position. Jessica's PR stunts may please her extreme Political Action Committee (disguised as a house of worship), but to the rest of the residents, visitors to the area and to local business owners, it is already having a negative impact locally and beyond our city. Please stick to governing Temecula and not proselytizing while in public office. Abortion is LEGAL in CA and is a medical matter between a woman and her medical provider, not the City Council. Thank you, Mary Ann We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors; we borrow it from our children and grandchildren. Chief Seattle, 1849 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:16 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public Comment From: Candace Cole < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 1:45 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jessica Alexander is an embarrassment to the city of Temecula and it's residents. At no time in her position on city council has she put aside her personal agenda to focus on the needs of Temecula. Instead, she has consistently used her position to draw negative media attention with racist remarks and now litigation. The tax payers of Temecula should not have to pay for her failures, especially on this issue that is not supported by the majority of residents. Abortion services are healthcare, and are guaranteed in California's constitution. I ask that Jessica Alexander resign from her position on Temecula City Council immediately, as she doesn't represent the values nor practice the professionalism necessary to hold this position. Candace 27 year resident of Temecula From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:21 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Making Temecula a Sanctuary city for unborn. From: JOLENE ARMENDARIZ < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 1:50 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Making Temecula a Sanctuary city for unborn. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon , I want to first of all say how thankful and encouraged I was to hear that you have preposed this meeting to vote on making Temecula a Sanctuary city for the unborn,that takes great courage. I have been told that 3 of the members are opposing it which of 2 are professing believers in Christ. I wanted to admonish and encourage you dear brothers or sister to be brave and courageous in doing what's right in the Lords eyes and not yeilding to the fear of man. You have am opportunity for such a time as this to be a light on a shining hill and changing the lives of countless children not just in your city but possibly in the world as they gain courage to stand for life beside your example! I'm praying for you all to honor your Lord Jesus Christ tonight and vote yes to save his children. Jolene From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:21 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Temecula City Council From: Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:19 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.eov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula City Council CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Temecula City Council, Thank you for your willingness to stand and be courageous. Often when two or three take a stand for what is right, they discover that there is an army willing to support them and cheer them on. I will be one in that army that chooses to support and cheer you on. Be strong and courageous in all that is good and true! Cities are looking for strong leaders that support and value life. I hope to see you stand and make a difference in Temecula and I hope other cities will be alerted to your strong stand. Families are suffering from the lack of strong leaders. We need you to stand firm. Thank you, Gale Parker Sent from Mail for Windows From: Council Comments Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 3:32 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Public comment for 9-27-22 city council mtg From: Cindy Kennedy < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 2:55 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Public comment for 9-27-22 city council mtg CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. City Council Members, I would like to thank Councilwomen Jessica Alexander for standing up for the unborn. It is so sad to see so many use abortion as birth control, not to mention late/full term abortions. As a very longtime resident ... I would like to thank you for having the courage to stand up for the constituents that voted for you. You uphold our conservative values of God, Country and Freedom us. The city doesn't seem to have any issue with proclamations for everything under the sun including BLM, Hispanic month, Pride month, LGBTQRSS+-...why not one for the unborn? IQ Ps- I am not a member of any church in this valley.... including 412. 1 was not told to write this by any pastor or person. Sent with Proton Mail secure email. From: Council Comments Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 3:31 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Non-Agendized Public comment for 09/27/2022 meeting From: Ellen G. < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 3:16 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Non-Agendized Public comment for 09/27/2022 meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mayor and Council Members, my name is Ellen Gross and I live in San Diego. I am commenting tonight after reading that a certain member may bring up a discussion about making the City of Temecula a "sanctuary city" against abortion and women's reproductive health rights to protect fetuses, and likely also embryos. While I do not live in your beautiful city, I visit often for the wonderful wineries, tasty restaurants and other amenities your city offers. As a citizen of San Diego and the State of California, and a lover of Temecula, I know that we all face myriad serious issues such as homelessness, poverty, drought caused by climate change, and weather conditions also caused by climate change. Municipalities with limited precious resources cannot and should not take any time from such serious issues to address the "personhood" of fetuses and embryos that one of your colleagues has raised and publicized for selfish political gain in the press and social media and perhaps tonight in public session. In anticipation of the agenda where you all can request items to be agendized, please swiftly and decisively take the issue of personhood for fetuses and embryos and being a "sanctuary city" for same off the table, if raised, never to arise again. It is illegal for you all as the legislative body in the State of California to attempt in any way to marginalize women's reproductive health. The oaths of office you take also preclude such activity. Thank you very much for your time and consideration. From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:10 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban From: Emily Beile < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 3:31 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council, It has become impossible for me to come speak to you all tonight, face to face as I had hoped for, but I still wanted to make my voice, and others, heard. I am addressing you not as part of an organization, group, or company, solely as a person filled with concern. What I have to say is only directed towards a few of you, but out of respect for your position I do not feel the need to name you off. I am concerned and embarrassed to live in a town like this where there are people who want to get rid of MY basic human rights. I am embarrassed that I even feel the need to express my thoughts. It is not only a priveilege but a RIGHT to have an abortion. I can still support said groups who help grieving women after an abortion but that is not the case for most. Are you really telling me that as an 18 year old college student who also works and is active in her community but cannot even afford to live on my own would have to face being a TEEN mother if I was forced into a sexual act without my consent? I may be an adult but I am not the same adult as you. You are an adult who can afford a home, a car, taxes, bills, groceries, and maybe even to keep other humans alive. I am an adult who lives with her parents, goes to work and to college, but cannot afford to buy my own groceries, pay my own medical bills or car payments, or even afford the basics on my own. Are you really telling me that you want to bring more children into this world that will not get to feel LOVE and be given the privilege of a good childhood as some of us did? If you were genuinely Pro -Life then you would be doing more to help all the children stuck in the foster system and being forced through violent and harmful homes their entire childhood life. If you were truly Pro -Life, you would be doing more for all of the people with mental health problems that are contemplating taking their own lives. If you were genuinely and truly Pro -Life, you would be more to keep the people in your life, alive. Are you telling me that you want to force YOUR opinion onto an entire city? It is in fact your opinion, and there is no other way to explain it. I can agree with you that an abortion SEEMS wrong and that it is scary, but it is not YOU receiving the abortion. I can agree with you that your RELIGION or your POLITICAL PARTY may be against abortion, but this has nothing to do with your religion or political party. I can agree with YOUR DECISION to be Pro -life, but I need you to also agree with MY DECISION to be pro -choice. I thought we were all taught from a young age to respect people's opinions and decisions, but at this moment I feel I was wrong. I understand that you have received negative backlash from your community because of this, but it is for a REASON. I have grown up in this city and this community, but I have never felt so scared for my future in this city. I urge you to reconsider your initial decision to spring this on the public, and leave the TOUGH decision of receiving an abortion to the women. PLEASE, keep your opinions out of my body. Thank you, Emily Beile From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:10 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Supporting women and babies -----Original Message ----- From: Dawnielle Selden < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 4:39 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Supporting women and babies CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I'd like to voice my support for the motion to make Temecula a sanctuary for life. We can best provide love and support to women when we value their lives and the lives of their babies! What a wonderful proclamation it would be to support the most basic of human rights for the most vulnerable. Having worked with trafficked young ladies, I know the pain they go through when they realize they've been used and abused, forced into abortion and living with that regret. It harms them immeasurably and affects them physically, mentally, emotionally, and even financially. I have watched these young ladies suffer for years, harming themselves with their life choices which are ramifications from the pain they have endured. Abortion is life changing for women and life ending for babies. While women in CA are certainly free to do as they wish, it would be profound to take a stand as a city to not allow abortion clinics to operate in this town. Thank you, Dawnielle Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:10 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn Importance: High From: Linda McDonald < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 5:00 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Resolution Declaring Temecula a Sanctuary City for Temecula's Unborn Importance: High CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I'm writing tonight in regards to Jessica Alexanders "Resolution" being brought to the city council agenda for tonight — making Temecula a "sanctuary" city for fetuses. To say I'm disappointed in this city councils ALLOWING one of its own members to attempt to blatantly bring her OWN personal religious agenda into this city is an understatement. You have taken an oath to the citizens of this city to do whats best FOR this city, and that means keeping RELIGION OUT of our government! I am an atheist myself and yet I don't insist everybody must reject god, that's their own personal right and part of our freedoms in this country, to believe what we CHOOSE to believe, not whats forced upon us! Frankly I see no place at city council meetings for PRAYER either, and that practice needs to be discontinued asap, its offensive to many of us. The State of California, thankfully, has stayed a state where women can still choose whether or not they wish to bring a life into this world and take care of that life, it's a good law, and to attempt to undermine it is not only foolish but illegal, and our Attorney General has stated as much. It seems to me that Jessica Alexander is simply trying to get attention in her party similar to Lauren Boebert and Marjorie Taylor Green. Maybe its time for our City Council to start actually concerning themselves with what needs doing in this city — possibly our OWN police department?!, and what to LEAVE ALONE! When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the bible, and here it is right here in Temecula! Sincerely, Temecula, CA 92592 ( Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:09 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City (I am against) From: Johanna Lack < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 5:04 PM To: Matt Rahn < matt. rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.eov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City (I am against) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I work in Temecula and my children attend Temecula schools. I want to add my voice to say that I strongly oppose the idea of Temecula becoming a "sanctuary city" where abortions cannot be performed. This is not the role of city governments and we must follow the laws of the State of California which allow women to choose autonomy over their own bodies. Considering that the Attorney General has already warned the City Council not to adopt this measure, I definitely hope that the issue will no longer be considered or discussed. Regards, Johanna Lack Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:09 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city From: Dan Brown < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 5:55 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If choice is what they demand, then make them own choice. I fully support Temecula as a sanctuary city for life. I believe viability and value start at the moment of conception. In fact Psalm 139 13-16 tells us that God forms us in our mothers womb, and that God, even before the substance of us existed, documented all about us in His book. I am not going quote scripture, but I am going to use a stories out of the bible for analogy. In the story of David and Goliath, David only needed a small smooth stone to slay the giant who desired to have his will over a nation. I'd like to offer you a small smooth stone to slay the giant you face today. The giant whose desire is have his choice alone. That is what they mean by pro -choice. Though they sell it as giving women a choice. My main reason for comment is to show you the smooth small stone within your grasp and to encourage you to do what it takes to get make history. This is a history making moment. It takes something other than courage to do so. To stand against vitriol, and hypocrisy of choice by those who claim to desire it. You can slay that giant. The pro choice opponents of a sanctuary city, cry that if choice is removed, that real freedom is taken away because their privacy is. So, if they want choice, then make them have one. Pass an ordinance that mandates every person entering a reproductive center that offers or refers abortion services, must provide the information given by those who value not only the life of the mother, but the life of the unborn. You would acquire the information offered by both sides, approve it, and keep a copy so you can audit compliance to it. The ordinance would require the patient to receive everything they would receive if they were to enter a pro -life, pro adoption center, including receiving and seeing the ultrasounds, with the audio turned on. This way, the patient can actually make an informed consent decision. They would actually then have a real choice. It's a win -win. The pro -choice get their choice, and the pro life get to present the life in the womb. As city council members you took an oath to defend the weak, to preserve life, to make safety, your highest priority. This would be a good way to ensure Temecula is safe place for everyone. You must defend the young, the immature, the emotionally unstable, the frightened, from those who will use that to their advantage. Think about this for a moment. They want choice, so how can they then fight against that which they use as their moniker: Pro -choice. Someone may ask, so why does the pro -choice organizations have to be the only ones this ordinance applies too? Simple. 1st they identify as pro -choice and 2nd. they are ones advocating for the act of violence on the patient and on the life inside her. Every pregnant person knows if they do nothing, they will be eventually giving birth to a child. That "tissue" is alive. It is an act of violence to end it. Therefore, the greater burden for the justification of ending that which is life, falls squarely on their shoulders. That is what a sanctuary does. It make is difficult to end life. Now, if it took both groups to have to present the information, I wouldn't fight against it. I know that when presented with the actual truth, women will by far choose life. They know that too. So, the giant will threaten, fight, get violent, intolerant. See real choice actually scares them. They prefer the silence of a womb, not the heartbeat of one. It is not their "choice". A servant of Elisha the prophet woke up one morning, walked outside his tent and saw an army surrounding the tent. He tells Elisha who yawns and says there are more with us then against us. The servant's eyes were opened and he saw thousands of angels on chariots of fire all round the other army. That truth exists for you. There are more with you than against you. The choice, the pro -choice cry for is the small smooth stone. It is their Achilles heel. The giant before you will fall if you take the stone and use it. This is not a question of " do you have the courage?". You do. That is why you are serving in those seats. It doesn't take courage to do the right thing. It takes integrity. Only you can surrender that way in cowardice.. The powers of our state capital have threatened you because they are scared. They know if you stand in your integrity, they will lose. They are losing already. There are more with you than against you. Call their bluff. Vote Yes. Sling the stone of mandated choice and slay that faux giant and save lives. Create a sanctuary for both mother and child. Make history. Sent from the all new AOL app for Android 2 From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:08 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: City Of Temecula City Council Meeting 09-27-22 Public Comment From: Lizzy Garcia < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 6:22 PM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: City Of Temecula City Council Meeting 09-27-22 Public Comment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Regarding Making Temecula a Pro -Life Sanctuary: As a resident of Temecula who is capable of having kids, I am embarrassed that this topic ever made the agenda. You can't force someone to have a child if they don't want one. We all know there are an infinite amount of reasons why a person would choose not to keep a pregnancy. However, that is between them and their doctor. You, the city council, are not included in that. It's funny how some people like to complain about their rights being taken away, but are more than okay with removing a federal right that had been on the books for 50 years. Roe v. Wade did not require people to have abortions. It gave them a chance to choose if having a kid right then was what they needed. A bunch of people complained about Obamacare and government overreach into medical decisions back when it went into effect. Are you not doing the same by making the local government take a stance on reproductive medical rights? I know I am one of many who DO NOT support making Temecula, or anywhere in the world, a pro -Life sanctuary. If you don't ever want an abortion, that is your choice. But do not take away the right to choose from the rest of us. - Elizabeth Garcia Temecula Resident and Pro -Choice Advocate From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:56 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: "Sanctuary City for the Unborn" Agenda 9/27 From: Carol Brown < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 7:18 PM To: Matt Rahn < matt. rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: "Sanctuary City for the Unborn" Agenda 9/27 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Attn: Temecula City Council - "Sanctuary City for the Unborn" I am here this evening to speak up and to be just one of the advocates, a voice for the unborn ... a voice for life!!! "For God so loved the world that He GAVE His one and only Son, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life." "Children are a gift from God". Termination of a baby is inhumane in Gods eyes and the doing away with any innocent life is murder Let's give the unborn a chance to live... Praying for each of you to voice yes... We need to respect All life - that is not what abortion does. Thank you for your time. Respectfully, Carol Brown Sent from the all new AOL app for Android From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:56 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed " sanctuary city' -----Original Message ----- From: Jennifer Speck < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 7:36 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposed " sanctuary city" CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Alexander, Thank you from the bottom of my heart for this proposal. I am here as the council speaks right now. I pray for the results, for you & your family. I fully support you 100%!!! Jen Speck Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:55 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: I support making Temecula a sanctuary for the unborn From: Mary Pearson < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 7:39 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.go >; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Subject: I support making Temecula a sanctuary for the unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am a 32 year old, life-long Temecula resident. I would be proud to belong to the one city in CA that supports pregnant women, and values lives of all people, born and unborn. Stand up! Let's have Temecula be on the right side of history. -- Mary Pearson From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:55 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City Resolution From: 3 J < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 7:56 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City Resolution CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am opposed to the Jessica Alexander propaganda resolution. Please do not allow her to bring her political grand standing policies to Temecula. Thank you. Ms. D. Lanik Temecula CA 92592. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:54 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposed "sanctuary city" -----Original Message ----- From: Jennifer Speck < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 7:57 PM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposed "sanctuary city' CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Schwank I am currently present at the city council meeting. You do not speak for me as a resident of Temecula. I would love to be a sanctuary city for the unborn. By the way I do not go to the 412 church! The way you spoke to Ms. Alexander was so disrespectful I was appalled. Shame on you! Sincerely, Jen Speck Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Proposal of pro life From: Neil Mazer < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:01 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Proposal of pro life CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I've lived in Temecula since 1999 and must speak up now regarding the illegal and illogical resolution by Council Member Alexander. Proposing a "sanctuary city for the unborn" is fundamentally incompatible with our society as a whole on all moral and ethical grounds. I am disgusted that someone newly elected to power in our city is so uneducated about the law. She is ignorant of the Health and Safety Code which is a subset of the California Constitution. In 1981, the California Supreme Court held that "all women in this state rich and poor alike possess a fundamental constitutional right to choose whether or not to bear a child." (Comm. to Defend Reprod. Rights v. Myers (1981) 29 Cal.3d 252, 262). Consistent with this precedent, the Legislature enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act (RPA), which codified a woman's fundamental right to procreative choice (Health & Saf. Code, § 123462). To that end, the Legislature forbid the state "and every county, city, town and municipal corporation" in the state from interfering with a woman's right to choose to bear a child or obtain an abortion (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 123464 subd. (c), 123466; see also Missionary Guadalupanas of Holy Spirit Inv. v. Rouillard (2019) 38CalApp.5th 421, 435 [abortions are a "basic health care service" and must be covered by health plans].) Those who violate established laws designed to protect vulnerable people should and will be stopped, and their personal bigotry and irrational fears are not to be respected. Instead, our Council should focus on the struggles (homelessness, poverty, public transit, etc.) now in our community. Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:S3 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Tonight's Ridiculous Meeting From: Bob Schindler < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:07 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Tonight's Ridiculous Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Sorry, the majority of you people are just a bunch of Democrats and not Christian's. If some of you say you are Christian's I laugh. Better read the bible people. Other than Jessica you are all just lying political Gavin Newsome pawns. I heard so many lies in your individual speeches that it made me sick. By the way our city is not safe because of any of you. It is safe because of our sheriff not you worthless political jerks. Good luck all ..... you will have to answer for your stupid personal decisions and if you really think you are a Christian you know what I mean. By the way there is only one law and that is God's and you will have to answer to Him one day. Let's see how that works out. If any of you wish to respond I welcome your comments but I doubt I will get any that make any sense. Oh by the way I didn't vote for any of you in the past and will continue that pattern in the future. From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:53 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: I support making Temecula a sanctuary city for the unborn From: I would like to state that I support making Temecula a sanctuary city for the unborn. I support Jessica Alexander's resolution. < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:14 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.pov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.P,ov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.pov> Subject: I support making Temecula a sanctuary city for the unborn CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I would like to share my support as a member of the community for Jessica Alexander's resolution to make Temecula a sanctuary city for the unborn. Thank you -Elizabeth Craig Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Against ban on abortion From: Nyssa Finn < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:00 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.eov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Marvann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Against ban on abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please remove this issue from the agenda. I am against making this a sanctuary city. I am a constituent of this city and believe firmly that reproductive rights belong to all and the city has no place in dictating my choice. Please take this topic off the table. Sincerely, Nyssa Finn From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:54 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: City Council From: Julie Reeder < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 8:26 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistantCate meculaca.gov> Subject: City Council CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I was so proud of you tonight at the council meeting and I would like to remind the council that Valley News didn't do what the other papers did. We are here 52 weeks of the year and reflect the community in a healthy way. From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Municipal legislative actions From: Kara Noel < Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 9:59 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Municipal legislative actions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Alexander, During the Temecula City Council meeting this evening, you stated your belief that "a resolution is not a law," and thus it cannot go beyond matters of municipal concern that have been preempted by state law. This is incorrect. Legislative actions of municipalities may take the form of an ordinance or resolution. Crowe v. Boyle (1920) 184 Cal. 117.). "A municipal resolution is used to express the opinion of the legislative body, or to reflect the action taken." Sausalito v. County of Morin (1970) 12 Cal. App. 3d 550; Central Manufacturing District, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1960) 176 Cal. App. 2d 850. Since a resolution can be revoked by a vote, it may be a more appropriate legislative action when dealing with temporary or special matters. In contrast, an ordinance can only be repealed by a subsequent ordinance, making it a more binding and robust option. Municipal resolutions that exceed the scope of matters of municipal concern may be preempted by state law. For example, in Younger v. Berkeley City Council, the court affirmed a grant of permanent injunction "which barred the application of city council's resolution ... because the field was preempted by state law and the resolution dealt with a matter beyond matters of municipal concern." Younger v. Berkeley City Council (1975) 45 Cal App.3d 825. I hope this helps to clarify the nature of the actions that may be taken by the City Council. Going forward, perhaps you could stop wasting the time of the city council and focus on something productive and within the scope of your job. Learning the basics of municipal legislation and ethics would be a good start. Best, Kara Gelman From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:12 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion From: Cs Cat < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 6:03 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think your heart is in the right place but women need to have access to healthcare. It is hard to understand unless you are in the medical field. Please try to understand that abortion is a necessary evil. I am a nurse of 25 years. Thank you, Cynthia Chesy From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Tuesday's vote -----Original Message ----- From: WILLIAM EISEMANN < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 8:14 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Tuesday's vote CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Morning Jessica, We've never met and I'm not from your district but I wanted to write and thank you for the stand you take in our community for life, morality and sanity. As I listened to the comments of those opposing your Sanctuary City proposal, my heart was grieved for you and your family. Please don't give up the battle. Many appreciate you, your efforts and are standing with you and will be praying for God to give you the strength to endure the attacks against you and lead us to a life saving and God honoring community. Grateful that you're here... Rick & Brenda Eisemann 1 From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:49 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion From: An wie < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 8:29 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jessica , my body and other women in this town are not your or council business. Women needs to decided for their own bodies ,not anybody else. It is better focused on people ,who are homeless now then abortion. You will add more homeless on the street in future, if you ban the abortion. Take off this ban and you have to know Americans women bodies are not your business.... not business of the councils and not business of any churches.... A citizen of Temecula From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 10:45 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Please Resign From: Kim Vaughan < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 9:34 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.Rov> Subject: Please Resign CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Councilmember Alexander - you have shamelessly used your position on our city council for blatant self promotion and as a platform for your religious beliefs. You have had more than your 15 minutes of fame. It is time for you to resign from your position and allow someone that understands their role as a council member to take your place. Sincerely, Kim Vaughan Temecula, CA 92591 Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:54 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank You- Council Meeting 9/27/22 From: Jeff Kingsberg < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:12 AM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Thank You- Council Meeting 9/27/22 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Stew, I watched a recording last night of the meeting after my evening coaching responsibilities at Great Oak High School. As a District 4 resident, I appreciate your comments toward the fact you represent ALL constituents, rather than just a single political group or passionate faction. I was pleased that the council voted 4-1 to not further pursue Ms. Alexander's interest in a city resolution. Your comments provided sound backing as to why the city and city council could not pursue this. I find it unfortunate that the council had to spend a significant period of time on this and be the host of a public debate over an issue that has polarized our states and nation for well over fifty years without resolution. Thank you for your diligence and commitment to our citizens as a whole. Jeff Kingsberg Temecula Valley Resident Since 1987 Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:30 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary city -----Original Message ----- From: Paula Worthington < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:17 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary city CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Having attended the council meeting last night, I wondered if the council members saw what I was seeing ... the anger and vitriol with which pro -abortion supporters ALWAYS express themselves. You cannot reasonably defend what is indefensible without the forces of evil being exposed. There was such a contrast between them and the pro -life crowd, that you would have to be blind or in denial not to see or sense that. Half truths and out-and-out denial is their mantra. Although I'm saddened with the outcome, it was not a surprise. It's been clear, over time, politics reigns supreme, even when you call yourself pro -life. To defend your stance, it was brought up over and over again that you must serve all Temecula citizens... but that's a screen. Last night's conclusion certainly did not serve all. What happened was you took the easy route which would inflict the least amount of damage to the woke mentality which is currently prevalent in society (and within our city council) and the least amount of damage to your political aspirations. Pro -Life warriors know what they're up against at all times, and when Jessica spoke about these evil forces, she was correct... Satan, demons ... all of it is real whether you believe it or not. Rest assured (or not), we all have an exit interview at the end, and we must ask ourselves how our actions will line up with the teachings of Our Lord. Thank you, Paula Worthington Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:30 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion issue From: C Billing < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:27 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.Rov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion issue CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I recently read your City Council are considering banning abortions. This is a womans right to make a decision. If you are going to control a person's body then why not make a man who has fathered several kids and refuses to pay child support have a vasectomy? It goes both ways. We have a right to decide what we want. The government is taking the women's fundamental rights away. We are being put back in time. Next our voting rights will be taken. This is our body. If you decide to take this right there will be deaths due to the back -room abortions like it was before. Funny how do many men feel they should control a woman's body. Yet how many laws are in place to control men. So, if you decide to take enforcing abortion make a law to make men get a vasectomy. Get Outlook for Android From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:31 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City -----Original Message ----- From: Paula Worthington < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:29 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Ms. Alexander: Below is the email sent to your fellow council members. Many prayers are being prayed for you, then and now. From a prayer warrior who stands prayer vigil in front of FPA twice a week for over two years and has been in the fight for over 45 years, I want to thank you for your perseverance, dedication and love for the precious babies. Last night was so difficult to watch and hear. The blasphemy toward you, but especially Our Lord, was heartbreaking. The 40 Days for Life campaign begins today and we started off with a bang last night! We know who wins the battle in the end! Blessings to you and your family... Here is the email I sent today - Having attended the council meeting last night, I wondered if the council members saw what I was seeing ... the anger and vitriol with which pro -abortion supporters ALWAYS express themselves. You can't reasonably defend what is indefensible without the forces of evil being exposed. There was such a contrast between them and the pro -life crowd, that you would have to be blind or in denial not to see or sense that. Half truths and out-and-out denial is their mantra. Although I'm saddened with the outcome, it was not a surprise. It's been clear, over time, politics reigns supreme, even when you call yourself pro -life. To defend your stance, it was brought up over and over again that you must serve all Temecula citizens ... but that's a screen. Last night's conclusion certainly did not serve all. What happened was you took the easy route which would inflict the least amount of damage to the woke mentality which is currently prevalent in society (and within our city council) and the least amount of damage to your political aspirations. Pro -Life warriors know what they're up against at all times, and when Jessica spoke about these evil forces, she was correct... Satan, demons ... all of it is real whether you believe it or not. Rest assured (or not), we all have an exit interview at the end, and we must ask ourselves how our actions will line up with the teachings of Our Lord. Thank you, Paula Worthington From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:17 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Citizen Comment - "Unborn Sanctuary City" Resolution From: David Tekle < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 11:45 AM To: Council Comments<CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Citizen Comment - "Unborn Sanctuary City" Resolution CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I would like to submit a citizen comment on the proposed resolution by Councilperson Jessica Alexander to make Temecula a "sanctuary city for the unborn." I strongly disagree with the action to infringe on our population's body autonomy and do not see how a city council responsible for zoning, redistricting, and budgeting decisions would be legally able to overstep the clear law set forward by our state government. The California Attorney General has already voiced that if a resolution is adopted it will be challenged in the courts, leading to my tax dollars being used to fight for a personal opinion put forward by a council member. If the city council has in fact been re-created as a governing body that circumvents the rule of law set forward by the state, then at a minimum I strongly disagree with the resolution and feel there should be made more opportunity for those of us in opposition to raise our concerns rather than having minimal open discussion time and a disorganized comment submission process. Thank you, David Tekle From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:18 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Resident Call: Outcome of 09-27-22 CC Meeting From: Cassandra Tabares <cassandra.tabares@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 12:10 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.goy>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Stacey Brown <stacey.brown @temeculaca.gov>; Luisa Tovar <luisa.tovar@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Resident Call: Outcome of 09-27-22 CC Meeting Hello, We received a call from resident Julie Georgiow. She wanted to express her disappointment in the Council Members decision not to move forward with adding the request of claiming Temecula as a sanctuary City for the unborn. She also mentioned that she is disappointed that there are Council Members who claim to be Christian on the council and they don't care about this issue, and it is saddening to see they are for killing babies. She says we live in such a good City, and it is going in a direction that is not very family oriented. No contact information was given. Cassandra Tabares Administrative Assistant City of Temecula (951) 694-6459 cassandra.tabares0temeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 2:54 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Please Resign From: Andrea valenzuela < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 2:30 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Please Resign CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Councilmember Alexander - You have failed your constituents by choosing to use your position on city council to promote your own self interests. Your actions are a violation of the oath you took and a clear demonstration of your disregard for the residents of Temecula. Please resign immediately and allow someone that understands their role as a council member to take your place. Sincerely, Andrea Valenzuela Temecula, CA 92591 From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:50 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Last nights meeting From: judy seagondollar < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:21:53 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Last nights meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I would like to thank you for your bravery in keeping your composure in the face of the brutal attacks you endured last night. The ignorance of your fellow members who caved to the pressure brought to them by the bureaucracy in Sacramento was astounding. The abortion activists in the room was undeniable and unfortunately the American people have strayed so far away from God that I pray they wake up before meeting their maker. God bless you for all you have tried to do. Thank You againM From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:50 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Last nights meeting From: judy seagondollar < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:38 PM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Last nights meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Your attack on Jessica Alexander was unprecedented you could have made your comments known without all the nasty rhetoric. She was trying to make Temecula a safe place for woman to come who needed help with an unplanned pregnancy. Instead you are opening the door to have woman come from everywhere, paying for their transportation and their abortion to the City of Temecula. You may have stated you received 85% of emails against it and that's only due to the fact that the rest of the hardworking taxpayers were to busy trying to earn a living to support themselves. I for one can only pray that your term is ended soon! From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:53 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: last nights meeting From: judy seagondollar < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 4:51 PM To: Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: last nights meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. It was a shame to see you cave to the bureaucracy in Sacramento, have you considered the expense of flying young women in to have that abortion? You say you are pro life when will take a stand for the murdering of babies? Unfortunately for you that you did not see all the God fearing patriots in the room down the hall and that your chances for reelection were severely compromised.. I do not want my tax paying monies to go to this abomination and I thought the purpose of this council was to stand up for its citizens..lf we do not start speaking out our country will see its demise don't you even see the writing on the wall? From: Randi Johl Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:09 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: last nights meeting From: judy seagondollar < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:03 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: last nights meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I really thought that when you started speaking last night that you would take a stand for the life of a child, unfortunately that was not the case. Jessica Alexander is the only brave soul on the City Council! If we do not start defending the unborn who will? Instead we will go along with the Governors agenda to get rid of as many as possible, fly them in from everywhere pay for their air fares and abortions and murder a life. This is so evil and sick and if folks don't wake up to this evil agenda we are doomed. When it's time to meet your maker can you go with a clear conscious? I have pity on your soul. From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:12 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Ashamed Temecula Citizen From: TINA JOHNSON < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:40 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.raInn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Ashamed Temecula Citizen CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Council, I have been a resident of Temecula for 18 years. I am a homeowner, a mother, a voter. and a taxpayer. I am absolutely disgusted by the behavior of Ms Alexander. I can no longer brag about my community or be a proud member of this City. Ms Alexander is supposed to represent ALL of the Temecula community. It is appalling that Temecula is represented on local news as an anti -abortion, anti-women's rights community. We have now made the news for our council member's racism, bigotry, ignorance, and hate. I just signed the Change.org petition to recall Ms Alexander and I can only hope it gets traction and moves forward. I promise to vote in every election moving forward to combat the disgusting turn our city council has taken. Today I am embarrassed to be a Temecula City resident. Be better! Tina Johnson Tina Johnson ( From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:12 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: lasts night meeting From: judy seagondollar < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 5:44 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: lasts night meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I could not believe your flippant approach at the meeting last night. What has happened to the city of Temecula you have taken it from a safe God fearing place to a place where gay bars are Ok and now come one come all and get your abortion on taxpayer money. You have given in to the bureaucracy in Sacramento and their evil agenda. Where are the people who will take a stand instead of cowering? Our founding fathers did not put abortion into our Constitution and it is not a right! There are safeguards in unwanted pregnancies such as contraception, morning after pills in rape cases. We are going down a road where there will be no turning back we have to stand up and fight for whats right is this not your job as council member? Jessica Alexander is the only brave soul on that Council and I pity and pray for all of you! From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:11 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Follow up from meeting 9/27 -----Original Message ----- From: Erin Garcia < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 6:52 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Follow up from meeting 9/27 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Mr. Rahn, I understand that last night's city council meeting was a difficult one to lead. While I appreciate your attempt to keep the tone cordial and neighborly, the issue brought forth by Ms. Alexander was not intended to be innocuous, innocent, or neutral. She intentionally introduced an inflammatory topic and then sat on the dais acting shocked when the public was outraged. Women's rights are not a topic to speak politely about. I did not appreciate your lecturing of the public for their rightfully placed anger. You came across as condescending and "fatherly". The people of Temecula do not need a parent to tell us to not be mad when our basic rights are challenged. I am proud of our community for coming out and showing up. Your vote against the continuation of this resolution was not unnoticed. Thank you for ultimately standing with the beliefs of the community. Sincerely, Erin Garcia From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:11 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Follow up re: 9/27 -----Original Message ----- From: Erin Garcia < Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2022 7:20 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Follow up re: 9/27 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Stew, I wanted to reach out to thank you for standing up for the good city of Temecula last night. Your comments were to the point and hit on what my family has discussed in our home. We appreciate the city council and your role in building a wonderful community to live in. Wading into state politics and religious ideology is not the place for this council. Thank you, Erin Garcia District 4 1 From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:11 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Personal views -----Original Message ----- From: Ben McCoy < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 8:24 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Personal views CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Keep your religion and personal beliefs out of government. You were elected to run government, not to try to influence people's personal actions and choices they make with their doctor. You have ZERO right to try to stand above others and castigate your personal beliefs and religion upon them. The 4-1 vote by the counsel shows how out of touch you are with reality and how unpopular you are. You are a hypocrite. Shame on you. Your antics have marred Temecula's image on the national stage, much like Trump has. If that's your goal, move to Florida. Many will be working to make sure you aren't re-elected in 2024. From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:10 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Stay strong From: Sue Whiting < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 8:42 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stay strong CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for having the courage to stand up for the unborn. Your City Council colleagues should be ashamed of their responses, especially Maryann Edwards and Schwank. Gavin Newsom and his ilk are formidable foes, but you tried to take them on. Keep up the good fight. Susan and Mike Whiting Recently relocated, long-time residents of Temecula Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:09 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank you for your comments at the last council meeting From: Kim Vaughan < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 9:54 AM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.eov> Subject: Thank you for your comments at the last council meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Councilmember Schwank, My name is Kim Vaughan. I am a native of the state of California and I made Temecula my home in 2018. 1 lived in South Orange County, specifically Laguna Niguel for 25 years where my 2 children grew up. I have been watching from the sidelines and learning about the "vibe" of this city since I moved here and it has been very interesting to say the least. I have recently become aware of certain issues that have been percolating in this area that continue to blur the lines between government and religion. I believe that others have the right to live, worship and vote according to their own values, but that their right ends there. A number of people and certain religious leaders that don't understand that concept of freedom are compelled to impose their values of everyone else. This is not appropriate and is certainly not acceptable. The good news is that these issues have brought many people in this city to the table and I see the call to action growing. I found your comments at the last council meeting encouraging. You were able to present a voice of reason that is desperately needed at this time in our local leadership. Keep up the good work! Sincerely, Kim Vaughan Temecula, CA 92591 Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:09 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Jessica... Keep fighting for the unborn! There is much support for you out here, even though your fellow council members still don't get it. From: Bruce Rogers < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 10:36 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica... Keep fighting for the unborn! There is much support for you out here, even though your fellow council members still don't get it. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Blessings in Christ, Bruce R. Rogers From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:03 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank you! From: Chuck Toro < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 11:18 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Thank you! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Temecula City Councilwoman Jessica Alexander, Thank you for standing your ground and providing a compelling argument against abortion in support of Temecula being a sanctuary city, Tuesday 27 September 2022. I sent a similar statement to a friend and wrote, "Remember William Wilberforce." He wrote back, "Remember John Paul Jones — We have just begun to fight." How is it that bacteria on Mars is considered life, but a viable fetus is not? Every pre -born child is a human being deserving of protection as the most vulnerable members of our society. Hung Cao — running for Congress in Virginia CD-10 Best regards, Chuck Toro From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 12:02 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion Ban -----Original Message ----- From: Beverly Williams < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 11:29 AM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am relieved to learn that for now this will not be the rule of law for Temecula. I really wanted to be at the meeting, but I have learned my mother is battling health issues so I had to make travel arrangements. My story is long but here is the short version. I was stationed in Spain when a dear friend found out she was pregnant after experiencing a medical emergency caused by the pregnancy. It was in her tubes and the military doctors did what needed to be done. I never questioned her about it I just supported her as a friend. I don't know what if any laws were in place then, but as an American service member on Foreign soil to have to shop around for medical care could have been a disaster. I've lived in Temecula for 25 years paying property taxes going to the same medical group I don't believe they provide this service but if they do I shouldn't have to shop around for care somewhere else. I hope you continue to keep an open mind towards a woman's right on this issue because the choice is not an easy one for them. Thank you Beverly Williams Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 3:33 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank you from Walnut Creek, CA Councilmember -----Original Message ----- From: Kevin Wilk < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 2:33 PM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Thank you from Walnut Creek, CA Councilmember CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mayor ProTem Schwank, I viewed the Temecula City Council Meeting from this past week and wanted to thank you for your thoughtful comments in response to Councilmember's Alexander "no -abortion" resolution. Your reasoned and intelligent (and correct) response is needed in this heightened time of hyper -partisanship and infringement on people's rights. Just this past year, I brought forth an item in Walnut Creek (the first in the East Bay) to protect women's safety at reproductive clinics with an 8 foot buffer zone to keep protestors from abusing or preventing the rights of women to be exercised. I just wanted to let you know that your comments were heard beyond Temecula and throughout California. I don't believe we've met before (at Cal Cities conference or a committee — I sit on the Environmental Quality Policy Committee for CalCities), but should we be at a league event in the future, I'd like to buy you a cup of coffee/drink and thank you in person. My best regards, Kevin Wilk, Walnut Creek City Councilmember (Mayor in 2021) From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:36 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: I am with you From: Dawn Thompson < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 4:05 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: I am with you CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Jessica, Just wanted to say thank you! I stand with you and we should protect our little babies. We have to ban together. We need to get other cities and communities involved. Please know this is such a calling on my heart. Please let me know if I can help you in anyway. The fact that they had 80% of the community calling in and supporting the right to an abortion..... I say bull!!!!! That is someone paying people to call —they are not real. Our communities are very conservative. Its time we take our local government and state back. Don't give up. If people could just understand. How many people do you know that would be ok with a dog who is pregnant to have her puppies pulled from her belly so she doesn't have puppies ... let the puppies die. NO ONE WOULD! Abortion is cruel and sick. Of course people will say- NO they would all be up in arms and work to find them homes- they wouldn't stand for it. People would cry and throw a fit over dogs and puppies but somehow it's ok with doing this to a human baby???? People have lost their minds. Anyways just wanted to say thank you! Lets not give up- people are just brainwashed and they really don't know what they are doing or saying. You are strong, they are weak- so thank you. I stand with you and would love to help in anyway that I can. Dawn Thompson Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 5:36 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Seriously From: Dawn Thompson < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 4:17 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Seriously CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Matt, I am emailing about the abortion topic and make Temecula a sanctuary city for babies. I believe you stated that you received several calls, 80% of the people supported keeping abortion... I say that is bull spit! You might have gotten the calls but they were not real people in the community. You are being deceived sir. A woman cannot have the right to kill another human being because that human is a hindrance to her. What if people did that in the community, just took out everyone that was a bother to them. I guess we should line up people on social programs and elderly, it's a bother to care and pay for them right- extra expense.... So wrong. Please stand up and listen to your true community... I didn't even know this was going on. I would have been there. I will be on the alert and this subject is coming back trust me. You have to stand strong and know that killing a human is not right. I wonder if you were having a meeting about dogs and aborting their puppies because the owner thought they were inconvenient... everyone in the community would be on the city doorsteps and you would be fighting along side them because it would not be the right thing to do, we could find homes for them right!!!! But for some reason a human life doesn't matter as much. It is disgusting. When are people going to stand up and be brave. You know what I am saying here is right! Stand up! M Make sure the community is aware of this and get all of us in to talk about it. People need to be vetted to make sure they are in the community before their voices should be heard, not just a phone call. Its easy to pay a group of people to call in and say whatever the big bucks want them to say. I pray that when this comes back you stand strong. Thank you Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:12 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: I'm with you! From: Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 8:31 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: I'm with you! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear coucilmember Jessica Alexander I'm a former east Los Angeles street cop of 7 years then was " called " to be a physician- I've practiced 33 years in Temecula - did missionary medicine in several countries and support your sanctuary city for the unborn children to save them from "convenience killing." I also affirm your China Virus or Chinese Communist Party Virus as does the Epoch Times newspaper. Abortion: As a medical student I've witnessed an abortion at 20+ weeks. I naively did a bimanual exam on a young woman thinking the surgery ( ILIP) was a ( (IVP) Intrauterine Pregnancy vs an Intravenous Pyelogram for removal of a kidney stone. I refused to assist the "surgeon " who constantly wanted me to participate in the killing of a baby I had moments before had cradled between my two hands in utero ! He called me every vial name in front of the sx team in the OR and threatened to have me kicked out of medical school. I've had patients who have had 4,6 up to 8 abortions - they use them as a convenience- paid for by tax$ by planned slaughterhouse. They say they don't but they do - millions and millions of. $ . It's a huge biz. Anyway, Keep up the fight!! If you need my help to talk from REAL EXPERIENCE to the knuckle heads I'd be glad to. God Bless your unwavering commitment for the unborn. Dr DavidC Robinson From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:11 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Thank You for Standing Up for What's Right From: David Burrus < Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2022 9:57 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Thank You for Standing Up for What's Right CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I have been a resident of Temecula for the last six years. This last Tuesday was the second time I've attended a city council meeting specifically to make sure I stood with my fellow citizens who correctly identified a misguided and inappropriate resolution proposal that would only serve to divide and hurt the people who live here. There were many powerful and amazing speeches made that denounced her and her idea. I did not speak or even have comments prepared in case I was called up because while strong rhetoric is called for in times like these, it is ultimately pointless to argue with a zealot. We were there to support you, not persuade her. Her "truth" is set in stone and no reasoned or well -supported argument can have any sway. It is stubborn and will not compromise or concede. This is not a strength but a weakness. It is why people laughed at her. It is why people, including me, shouted and let our anger be heard. It is why the community ultimately embraces better, healther ideas and isolates those who would do them harm. I would like to think that if I had a chance to speak I would have been eloquent or succinct but it doesn't matter. I hope I would have been able to gather my composure and say something simple enough for her to comprehend: Your God says YOU can't do that - ok, fine .... go live your life Your God says I can't do that - F*#k off, weirdo! Maybe that's immature to wish I could have told her off or it can be criticized as "disappointing" but ah, well..... doesn't really matter now. Americans should never tolerate morality police who would instill a theocratic order at any level of our society or use any official power to claim a self -declared moral high ground and look down upon the rest of us who believe differently. They deserve to be loudly told to go kick rocks. As we all experienced, Tuesday was a loud night. But something quieter happened that I'd like you to know about. Something I could see from my seat in the audience. I watched her face during the chaplin's invocation. It was still and calm during the first moments. Then, upon hearing him say the word "diverse" as an adjective to describe our community, she flinched. Surprise, then disgust, then a coldness rolled over her face. I believe, at that point, she stopped listening to the chaplin because she looked away from him, up to the ceiling and began to silently mouth her own prayer, if it could be called that. I held her in low esteem before; but, that moment convinced me that she does not respect all of us, the vision for our city, or truly the American ideals that were not fully realized upon our country's founding but still inspire us to be better than our past. She is not fit to serve our city. Her extremism is a cancer. I have my own religious beliefs. I do not bring them into my workplace. I may wish things were a certain way. I do not attempt to interfere with anyone else's life. I have privilege and a certain amount of ease walking in this world. I do not consciously use it to further an "us" versus "them" conflict. I have a wife and daughter. I do not want them to live under local, state, or federal laws that limit their rights. Please do not get conned into letting even a vague resolution about this matter get issued. With attacks from people like her, it's always the first crack in the armor that ultimately proves ruinous. Yes, some clarity about the process of issuing resolutions can get clarified but please know that if even the most innocuous wording drafted by her and those other soft -head charlatans comes up for debate, we will be back to shout it down again. Because it is clear. It's so dumb and blatant. We see it's her goal to either score a win and do something that can be hailed as a victory for her cultish movement or simply continue feeding the outrage cycle which she and Thompson hope will gain them increased notoriety and fundraising totals. She is playing politics. She is conning the marks. She is creating a hostile work environment for city staff and the police officers who had to be there last night to protect the peace which she is disrupting. I can't believe that, at a city council meeting, she had the audacity to proclaim that at the end of our lives, we "will meet (our) maker and be judged" and apparently, according to her, be eternally damned for not taking action to demean and discourage access to a legal healthcare procedure. I am a person of faith but I still yelled out "Not all of us believe that!" because as an American, I will always defend my non -believing fellow citizens and not allow bullies to use religion as a cudgel. Shame on her. Shame and dishonor for violating her oath. If a future resolution passes, it will endanger healthcare workers who provide necessary services to Temecula residents. It will make it look like the city favors only one group's religious beliefs. It will be seized upon as a foothold to try more of this nonsense. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for standing strong last Tuesday. Please do not waver. This is already a long message. I could write more about 412's concurrent effort to pack our school board. Her support for those individuals is another stain on our city. Hopefully, I am at this point, preaching to the choir. I believe you also see her true nature and know Temecula deserves so much better. My request is this - to the extent possible, do not allow her to preach from that seat she occupies during council meetings. It is unseemly and vulgar. It is un-American. Thank you for your time reading this email. Thank you for your service to our community. All my best, David Burrus From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:11 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: I live in Muurieta From: Joan Coale < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 7:21 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: I live in Muurieta CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. But wish I lived in Temecula so I could vote you out. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:11 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Sanctuary City? -----Original Message ----- From: Kenneth Dealy < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 8:35 AM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Sanctuary City? CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I sure hope the city can stay out of this controversial issue as far as passing some kind of local resolution or ordnance! The issue belongs with the state legislature and governor, NOT individual counties, cities, school boards, improvement districts, HOA's, etc.. If a council member needs to be pressing for action on these issues they need to step down locally and get elected to a state office. The Supreme Court left this to STATE Legislatures, not every local jurisdiction. Thank you K. Dealy PS We have a nightly camper at Riverton park. I have let Stacy Fox at City know last week but nothing has taken place. Got nothing against people being homeless but the park is CLOSED from 9 PM to 5 AM., at least according to the sign. From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 10:11 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Abortion ban -----Original Message ----- From: Kristy Milton < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 8:59 AM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Abortion ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jessica, I wanted to thank you for standing up against abortion and trying to get abortions banned in Temecula. Thank you for your hard work for Temecula, Kristy Milton From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:24 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Standing -----Original Message ----- From: Liana Weskamp < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 5:21 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Standing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am disappointed you didn't stand for life. If we cannot trust you to stand at the City level against evil, then we certainly cannot trust you to stand for truth and righteousness at any other level of government as it gets more wicked as you move up. Now we are not just a sanctuary state for murdering the innocent in the womb, we are a sanctuary state to destroy our youth as a sanctuary for transgender Ian because as children they think with emotions and not critical thinking. Shame on this evil government, shame on the 4 city council members who fear man more than God. You will account for what you did and didn't do while here, and that scares me for you all. Bless Jessica - God will say to her one day "Well done my good and faithful servant" Liana Weskamp Sent from my Phone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:24 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Not standing -----Original Message ----- From: Liana Weskamp < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 5:40 PM To: Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Not standing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am very disappointed that the majority of the city council caved to the fear of man over standing for righteousness. We all know it wasn't a law, it was a statement to go out to California that we stand for life. But you caved. I see you one award presented to you was a "Family First" award. I think your vote nullifies that. Evil is growing and it is because people are not standing up for righteousness. Now we are not just a Sanctuary State for the murder of the innocent we are a sanctuary state for the destruction of our youth, and our very identity. Feelings over biology. Convenience and selfishness over the sanctity of Life. When Jessica, meets God, she will be told "Well done my good and faithful servant." What will you hear? Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:24 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Stand for Righteousness -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 5:56 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stand for Righteousness CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Matt, I know your a new Christian and taking a stand with Jessica regarding the sanctify of life is critical . Our country is in peril because we have sacrifice 70 m lives at the alter of evil. How can I support you for State Assembly if you can't stand for the unborn at the local level ? Our country is losing its way because we are in a spiritual battle and it's time to take a stand against evil in all its forms and be counted by God . I urge you to stand up against Gov Newsome and his wicked leadership. Please don't get pulled into the evil corrupt ways of his Satanic leadership that continually attempts to erode the family and all its stands for. Doug Weskamp COL (ret) Sent from my Whone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:24 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Not Standing -----Original Message ----- From: Liana Weskamp < Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 S:S8 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Not Standing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As I read your bio, it surprises me that you did not Stand for Life. A Trinity graduate, children, 6 grandchildren would indicate a man who knows the word of God and is a family man. I am disappointed that you did not take a stand against this evil state and it's tyrannical entity that is destroying everything good. We are not dumb, we know Jessica was wanting a Resolution stating Temecula stand for Life - she wasn't passing a law. The fact that the news and the crazies keep trying to pass that lie off as truth is laughable and is being used for you all to justify your vote. The truth is you and the other 3 are more afraid of man than God. And this is why the evil entity in Sacramento keeps upping the evil here. Now we will do not just promote the murder of the innocent and relish in it, we will now allow the young to destroy themselves based on emotion and confusion and relish in that. This is abominable and evil will co ti he to abound unless His people stand. The fact that you caved on something as simple as standing for life gives me little hope you will stand for anything righteous. Jessica stood for her beliefs and will one day be told "Well done my good and faithful servant," if I were you I'd be afraid of the words you will hear. But that can change, and I hope it does. Standing for Life - Liana Weskamp Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:23 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Not Standing -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 6:07 PM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Not Standing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Stew, You will have to stand and be judged whether you personally believe or not. You had an opportunity to make a statement for the unborn that have no voice . You chose to the easy path that aligns with our evil CA Gov. Someday you will have to answer for this cowardly world view stand vs speaking for the unborn . You chose to align yourself with the vocal minority but the silent majority is watching I am watching your creator is watching . We will vote you out next election because of inaction like this . Stand for Life or be voted out Doug Weskamp COL (retired ) Sent from my iPhone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:23 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Stand for Life -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 7:29 PM To: Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stand for Life CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Zak, You had an opportunity to be courageous and stand for the unborn. Our Sheriff is elected and stands for his constituents vs with Corrupt CA leadership . He is still standing and will be re- elected because he of his moral courage . You will have to answer for this decision . If I'm the future you have an opportunity to demonstrate moral courage in the face of a vocal minority I pray that you demonstrate . The silent majority is waking up . Doug Weskamp COL ( ret ) Sent from my Whone 1 From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:23 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Stand for Life -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 7:36 PM To: Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stand for Life CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As someone who has received a previous award for family you recently voted against a resolution to respect the sanctify of life . Like Pastors in leadership who lead their flock astray they will be held accountable to God . I pray that you can exhibit moral courage in the face of the vocal minority the next time you are called to vote , otherwise you too will be held accountable to your creator. I will actively campaign against you the next time you run for a position . Sent from my Whone From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:21 AM To: Randi Johl Subject: FW: Warrior -----Original Message ----- From: Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 7:41 PM To: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Warrior CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Jessica Thank you for your courageous stance for life. My wife and I have emailed all other members and expressed our displeasure for their lack of moral courage . We are proud of you stay in the fight God has your back and you are in our prayers COL Doug Weskamp (ret) Sent from my iPhone 1 RECEIVED S s.,,.�,-4—� NATURAL COLOUR SEP 26 2022 PHOTOGRAVURE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICh T-e/itt CK �aJ W � SEP 2®�°15 T Pik°� L — ;'1 4-, -6 O '� f-�-i�►1 s c t+-) 1 AiD 0. _ �1 �0. orf��•- �rc� SgnC'fj . j c'1,j S'C2 War'4" r w,h.a ^ b s 1ALii o C�. �� Qc�sen�Q MCrrta�r 4,ea pVD ,V1cc(A THE RIVER COE, GLENCOE. Argyll, Scotland. - Trge Sisters" withthe ]�s�•t�hii �• t'As'fatural Colour hoto ph 1c'k14ul'lil{iiiiiii 3465 (6i/ Etirliijlillt�� r Sc k W 423 ppCA� � n�g 1r1t6Sur vIxon-- S'�'d�9i c-t4 a L C� CDT/A �r i nn «ter b-c ¢.ems w ar�a� � q(L),o o Ma t f 049r' ilis Ala/Af/- —12W ,�4, (� M INVERARAY CASTLE, ARGYLL, seat of the Duke of Argyll, Chief of Clan Campbell. The castle was built m C. 1746 by Roger Morris and stands in beautiful grounds a i tthrow h which flows the River Aror�it`'i��trtij,i'li,!"iil"i{il{i'II"li{iii'i'1{'{I�I'i{" 7 . r.t--� r..-. 1 S bb4 1T Lib Ib U7'" 4i�f7toifraph by J. Art r !An tudQi / (/9 3474 i(IYi Y# dean eaa utiru1 scene y pf Repulse Bay. SN Po' ZeOt,f �-S 32-ye- its ode,,- aF- ?-/ S v�9( "n j ipr oposa 40 4�; r,., l _� U O _o_ Main S4- 4h ca 1a !n-10 an ^Lor hok— �� �-, e-e^ q wpw�a� _------------------------ �d yer dd c toti, T a C,t 1�1 SEP 2 3 2022 �°�� 9s1� HONG KONG. 'k 90 DENNIS M O'CONNOR�L* sip 23• D TEMECULA, CA 92591 CIIy�AG 2022 E� S D� 9/20/2022 Dear Councilwomen Alexander, I have noted your actions regarding abortion. In this crazy world, it takes a lot of courage to stand up for what you believe. Abortion has been part of human's history since the first days of populating the earth. The life or death of a fetus sadly is part of our human's DNA. With God's direction the life of a fetus or baby is winning out. I am a retired citizen who loves this country and grew up in Illinois. I have had job assignments which have taken me to most parts of this country. I served as Councilman and elected Mayor for a city in Illinois. In California I have been a Senior Executive on some of the state's largest infrastructure and environmental projects and consulted and advised Governors, Mayors, Supervisors, council members, educator's and members of Congress. I also represented a major corporation In Washington DC and worked with both Senate and House members. The question of Abortion has always weighed heavy on me. I was 34 when it was legalized and I have witnessed over these past years the pain and confusion within my family, friends and acquaintances both men and especially women. I understood the right to respect the reproductive choice of a woman but I could never understand how women and policy -makers could use the unborn as some kind of money making and political power tool. Over these years I have seen how this whole issue has completely misused the real needs of women with hateful division. A real issue is one of responsibility over one's body to practice safe sex and for the women to choose a partner wisely. These actions too often are bad choices and end in pain for the woman, the man walks away and their creation pays the price. Not even Mother Nature could create such a destructive process. I had previously written the attached article and updated it recently. I pray it will of some value. God Bless. Denn ` t ,�� JVI 9� Abortion Requires Communication Not Division By Dennis M O'Connor There have been several events that have had a major impact with attitudes towards our fellow citizens and for the values of this country; first, the mass killing of young children in Newtown and recently in Texas second the changes to the law that legalized abortion. Both have amplified the social conflicts that are facing each of us as Americans including the control of guns and the control of a women's right to choose. We can and should reflect on each event and man's violent nature and ask the question "Is it really possible to have a better life". Linking them is also part of the overwhelming grief that is shared from these tragedies. It was stated by President Obama when he spoke of terrible shootings in Newtown, "They had their entire lives ahead of them, birthdays, graduations, w weddings, kids of their own." Pro -Life supporters supported the President and felt the pain of those 27 including the 20 % children who lost lives on December 14, 2012. On the June 2022 Superior Court ruling of Roe v. Wade pro -life supporters prayed that the President of these United States would be just as engaging towards the scores of unborn children that have been lost over 50 years. In my thirty's I personally remember the tragedy of women facing unsafe abortions and death. My focus was on protecting the women and the fetus was very secondary. As I grew so did science and technology and as I witnessed a growing fetus I saw two lives a woman with a child. I also witness the establishment of a moneymaking corporation that encouraged abortions and power hungry political leaders who have divided our country. It frightens me Are women's choices being communicated to unite women's needs? Are women's interests not as important as the privileged use of money and political power? When does life begin? And who has the right to give or take away life? One could argue that in our society. In today's abortion thinking the fetus or child must be destroyed, the life must end. We have become obsessed with ending life. We have forgotten how to improve and protect against rape, incest, medical procedures, and the trauma of terminating or carrying a baby to term not wanting that child. The privileged news, Social media and political leaders have made life seem so simple and strait forward that the natural virtue of life and its rights have lost their meaning. Life is inconvenient, the enemy or to be desensitized. Even in the judicial system the question of life has been raised, recall Justice Harry Blackmun's statement in Roe v. Wade, "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins. When those trained in the respective disciplines of medicine, philosophy, and theologies are unable to arrive at any consensus, the judiciary, at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer" There are those that would respond to Justice Blackmun's and pro -Life crusaders with the wise and simple statement especially with today's science that it is better to be "safe than sorry" when contemplating something as profound as when life begins. Induced termination of pregnancy has a long world history in fertility and population control; however there has always been controversy and debate. Differing theology, values, moral and philosophical orientations have created attitudes which have had a significant impact on the scientific, technological, educational and policy objectives of societies across the globe. In the United States gaining the access to safe and legal abortions in 1972 finally allowed a woman to have the basic right of controlling her own body. Prior to legal abortion, women had two options: undergo an unsafe, illegal abortion that put their bodies at risk, or continue their pregnancy, even in situations that were disadvantageous to both the woman and the unborn child. Pro - choice feminist crusaders viewed the right to an abortion as integral to a women's right to sovereignty. These concepts on the surface sounded logical," lets equalize women," let women control their own bodies." Their positions spawned crusader movements including "pro -choice" and" pro - life" and the social conflicts we now experience. The unfortunate reality was there was limited focus on other critical issues like the fetus, choice vs. murder, fertility control, religious values, education and the impact on the human species. These concerns needed to be communicated and understood along with the lasting effects abortion has had on marriage, family institutions and man's humanity. In 1964 then President Lyndon Johnson in his ideas for a Great Society stated "Many of you will live to see the day, perhaps fifty years from now, when there will be 400 million Americans." Fifty years later we have 350 million Americans, but in the last fifty years there have been 64 million abortions. Add the numbers, we have lost a third of our children's generation. Does it make sense that our leaders and judicial system have overstated man's rational moral judgment to putting his own species at risk? Accepting and Justifying abortions as a normal "way of life" can be quite puzzling. Pro -choice crusaders say we must have abortions because they are a useful tool if we are to protect the rights of women. The abortion operation is very innocent, they call it a procedure and the fetus is just an inconvenience to you. They tell you that you are doing the right thing and they treat you kindly. The room is sterile and the staff very friendly. Political leaders like Nancy Pelosi say it's the right thing, we are just protecting a women's right to chose. As far as concerns about religious beliefs, "It's just this conscience thing." Members of our society, the crusaders and the media have created the emotional distance that now allows a person to terminate a fetus and justify it more easily. Moral distance has also been created by defining motherhood and families as an inferior social status. The fetus is dehumanized and considered inferior. Like the Nazi's classified the Jews, in the United States, remember blacks and American Indians were also classified as inferior and subhuman. In the end with abortion we have lost an individual life that is capable in all respects as we once were, a life that only needed the opportunities and privileges which we possessed to enable its existence. We have lost the opportunity to be a society which shifts our violent values to better choices for women like contraception, sex education and smart parental planning. After all who really wins these wars of individual conscience? No one, all sides lose heavily, the mother, the unborn child, the women of America and our humanity. Freethinker Charles Darwin from his book The Origin of Species states, "How fleeting are the wishes and efforts of man! How short his time! And consequently how poor will be his results, compared with those accumulated by Nature during whole geological periods! Can we wonder, then, that Nature's productions should be far "truer" in character than man's productions; that they should be infinitely better adapted to the most complex conditions of life, and should plainly bear the stamp of far higher workmanship?" Might a normal person reading that quotation wonder, regardless of whether they are pro -life or pro -choice, that if it has taken Nature eons to create our human morality does it make sense that man can justify a system in 50 years to kill life like swatting a fly? There is hope in the tragedy of abortion and it will be the morality of our human nature that will finally sort out the abortion issue along with enhancing the real value of women in society. We need only to look to the evolutionary mechanism of natural selection and morality which makes an implicit distinction between "good" or "ethical" situations, and "bad" or "unethical" ones which are eventually eliminated. It is logical that we will see higher moral values with anything that contributes to survival of the species, and evil with anything that destroys kills or thwarts the development of ethical systems like the unborn which is the basis of the species. Respected Humanist, Philosopher A.J. Ayer in his book Language, Truth and Logic state "Ethics, too, are nothing but reverence for life. That is what gives me the fundamental principle of morality, namely, that good consists in maintaining, promoting, and enhancing life, and that destroying, injuring, and limiting life are evil." Noted Author Philosopher Immanuel Kant in his book on the moral law stated; "Why should we want to act morally? That is, why should we will in a rationally consistent manner? Why can one not make an exception of oneself and one's case?" Kant's arguments stem from his concept of freedom. He argues that "the very idea of morality, the limiting of oneself from engaging in certain behaviors because they are immoral, is the highest expression of the concept of freedom". In closing, each day we see new individuals take leadership roles knowing the unborn, like the born, share a common nature "humanity' and as a result they possess an irreducible moral and ethical value. Sir Arthur Keith in his essay on A New Theory of Evolution states, "It is a government's business to carry out "a partnership, not only between those living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born." In the past with abortion, that partnership was overlooked. Abortion has targeted the most weak and vulnerable of human beings for destruction and the impact of such killing clearly resembles historical genocides. Many of the political leaders realize that the massive abortion numbers will certainly impact our society for generations to come. Citizens are beginning to understand this is not the religious right against a woman's rights--- it is literally women vs. women and the moral and ethical value of our species. One could only imagine how difficult it will be to dislodge this killing machine that has existed for over 50 years but it can be done with the right leadership and ideas. The leadership of the pro - choice movement and their political supporters must find common ground or they will be remembered with the violence and moral horror of these 50 years and 64 million lost lives and become part of the trash heap of history just like the genocide leaders of the past. Even Margaret Sanger's the founder of Planned Parenthood "What contraception was; that abortion was the wrong way —no matter how early it was performed it was taking life; that contraception was the better way ... because life had not yet begun" She even pronounced that "the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year were a disgrace to civilization" Acknowledgements • Charles Darwin; On the Origin of Spices, The Decent of Man • Claire Pomeroy; Abortion and Women's Rights: Unification of Pro -Life and Pro -Choice through Feminism • A.J. Ayer; Language, Truth and Logic • Richard S. Krannich; Abortion in the United States • James Rachels; The Moral Implications of Darwinism • Frances Kissling; Essays • CNN Reporting; Remarks by President Barack Obama • President Lyndon Johnson, Remarks at the University of Michigan; Progressive idea of a "Great Society." • Immanuel Kant ; Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals; Critique of Practical Reason; Metaphysics of Morals • Sir Arthur Keith; A New Theory of Human Evolution • Margaret Sanger's quotes biography