Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
10192022 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 19, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Vice Chairperson Lanae Turley-Trejo ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of September 21, 2022Recommendation: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda October 19, 2022 Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca .gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Receive a Presentation on the Draft Quality of Life Master Plan That the Planning Commission receive and file the report .Recommendation: Agenda Report Draft Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) QLMP Timeline Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision . Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 3.Planning Application No. PA22-0494, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. Recommendation: Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda October 19, 2022 PA22-0494, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 19 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR FOUR (4) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 16 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions Draft PC Resolution Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 4.Planning Application No. PA22-0495, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0495, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 20B OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR FOUR (4) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 23 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions Draft PC Resolution Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 5.Planning Application No. PA22-0496, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots, Scott Cooper Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda October 19, 2022 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0496, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 21 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR SIX (6) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 18 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions Draft PC Resolution Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 6.Planning Application Number PA22-0996, a Modification Application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection, Eric Jones Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0996, A MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW FOR CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE AMENDED FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN STREET AND PUJOL STREET INTERSECTION, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) SECTION 15162, SUBSEQUENT EIRS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS (APN NOS. 922-053-047, 922-053-048, 922-053-021) Recommendation: Page 4 Planning Commission Agenda October 19, 2022 Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Revised DP COAs and Map COAs Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption Attachments: 7.Long Range Project Number LR21-0279, an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards, Eric Jones Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2009071049) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR21-0279)” Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Draft PC Resolution - EIR Addendum Exhibit A - CC Resolution EIR Addendum Exhibit A – EIR Addendum Draft PC Resolution – Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution Exhibit A – Specific Plan Amendment (Underline/Strikeout) Old Town Specific Plan Program EIR EIR Addendum No. 1 Notice of Public Hearing Draft Notice of Determination with County Clerk Attachments: Page 5 Planning Commission Agenda October 19, 2022 COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, November 2, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 6 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 21, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Adam Ruiz ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio (absent), Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Hagel, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of August 17, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Planning Application No. PA22-0593, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 21,793 square foot industrial building located at 42684 Avenida Alvarado, Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0593, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 21,793 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 42684 AVENIDA ALVARADO AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 2 3. Planning Application No. PA22-0594, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 11,369 square foot industrial building located at 42673 Avenida Alvarado, Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0594, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 11,369 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 42673 AVENIDA ALVARADO AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 4. Planning Application No. PA22-0595, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 22,679 square foot industrial building located at 42661 Avenida Alvarado, Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0595, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 22,679 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 42661 AVENIDA ALVARADO AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT 3 ADJOURNMENT At 6:21 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, October 5, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Gary Watts, Chairperson Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: October 19, 2022 SUBJECT: Receive a Presentation on the Draft Quality of Life Master Plan ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Matt Peters, Principal Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission receive and file the report. BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) has been updated to include seven Core Values including: 1. A Safe and Prepared Community; 2. Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; 3. Healthy and Livable City; 4. Economic Prosperity; 5. A Sustainable and Resilient City; 6. Accountable and Responsive City Government; and 7. Equity City staff and consultants worked with a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) during the last year to update the QLMP. The plan update includes specific goals; key accomplishments; key findings; metrics of progress; and strategic priorities. The City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Annual Operating Budget (AOB) are reviewed annually for conformance with the City’s Core Values identified in the QLMP. A presentation will be given highlighting the process, public input, and a summary of the goals and indicators in the plan update. Commissioners will have an opportunity to ask questions and provide input on the Draft QLMP. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) 2. Citizens’ 20-Year Priorities Timeline © 2022 City of Temecula • TemeculaCA.gov Lighting2040the Path to QUALITY OF LIFE MASTER PLAN DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 Commission and Board Representatives Lanae Turley-Trejo Planning Commission David Matics Public/Traffic Safety Commission Eric Faulkner Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Commission Kathy Sizemore Community Services Commission Ross Jackson Old Town Local Review Board Community Representatives Aaron Petroff Social Work Action Group Amy Minniear Special Needs Community Brooke Nunn Chamber of Commerce Carl Love Local Historian Darlene Wetton Temecula Valley Hospital Gary Oddi Bike Temecula Valley Coalition Jacob Mejia Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians Jeremy Brown Mount San Jacinto College Juan Carlos Duron Optiforms Karen Valdes TVUSD Kimberly Adams Visit Temecula Valley Sandy Rosenstein Interfaith Council Chad Pelekai Camp Pendleton Scott Treadway Rancho Christian Schools Tammy Marine Habitat for Humanity Teri Biancardi Sierra Club the Blue RiBBon Committee temeCula City CounCil the pRojeCt team Matt Rahn Mayor Zak Schwank Mayor Pro-Tem Maryann Edwards Council Member James “Stew” Stewart Council Member Jessica Alexander Council Member A Special Thank You and Acknowledgment to the Members of the QLMP Team. Aaron Adams City Manager Kevin Hawkins Assistant City Manager Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Matt Peters Principal Planner Brandon Rabidou Principal Mgmt. Analyst Stuart Fisk Planning Manager Mark Collins Assistant Planner taBle of Contents OUR VISION 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 CITIZENS’ 20 YEAR PRIORITY TIMELINE 8 SETTING THE STAGE 9 A Safe and Prepared Community 15 Transportation Mobility and Connectivity 21 Healthy and Livable City 27 Economic Prosperity 33 A Sustainable and Resilient City 39 Accountable and Responsive City Government 45 Equity 51 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 definitions Vision A statement describing Temecula’s approach to sustaining a high quality of life enjoyed by its residents. Core Value A statement of the values that comprise Temecula’s vision of its desired quality of life. Goals Outcomes the community desires to achieve in order to attain its desired quality of life. The City has overall goals, or aspirations, and also specific goals and objectives within each Core Value area. performance indicators Data points used to measure progress towards achieving Core Value goals. strategic priorities Projects to help implement the goals within each Core Value. the Quality of life master plan A framework of goals and performance measures that the City uses in its planning and budgeting process. Each City Department sets annual service goals in the budgeting process and is measured against those goals during the following year’s budget process. In addition, each project included in the Capital Improvement Program is aligned with the QLMP Core Values and must be justified in terms of how it helps to achieve the Core Value objectives. Contents Prepared for the City of Temecula By: Applied Development Economics adeusa.com True North Research tn-research.com MIG migcom.com CITY OF TEMECULA The QLMP Team Citizen’s Surveys Conducted By: 1 2 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 Our Vision With a deep understanding of our history, the City of Temecula is a community and culture on the move. We are dedicated to family, neighbor- hoods, economic prosperity, education, health, and safety. Focused on doing it right the first time, we continue to pursue the highest quality of life for all – something we call... “The Temecula Way” lighting2040the path to 3 4 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 The Temecula Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) 2040 is a visionary and living document created to express the aspirations, ideals, and strategic priorities of the City and community. This second edition continues the successful path established by our predecessors in 2009, when the City marked its 20-year incorporation anniversary. A look At the pAst During Temecula’s first twenty years, City leaders and residents engaged in proactive community building that resulted in many significant accomplishments and a cherished, high quality of life. With vision, focus, planning, and follow through, Temecula forged itself into a dynamic city and regional economic center for Southwest Riverside County. Throughout this transition Temecula retained its small town feel and character even in the midst of strong population and economic growth. Throughout the past ten years, the QLMP has been a very successful tool for City goal setting and project implementation. All City Departments maintain performance indicators based on the QLMP Core Values and all Capital Improvement Projects are evaluated in terms of their adherence to the QLMP values. The original QLMP was intended as a 20 year plan, but many of the goals and project priorities have already been accomplished. City leaders, anticipating the larger general plan update, determined that this was an important opportunity to update the QLMP to help set the stage for that comprehensive planning process. The first and second editions of the QLMP are framed between a series of major economic and social disruptions. In 2009, the Great Recession resulted in one of the worst economic declines in U.S. history. In 2020, as the City embarked on the QLMP update, the COVID-19 pandemic, in conjunction with a national social justice movement, culminated in historical socio- economic impacts that challenged basic health, cultural, and societal norms. Never one to shy away from a leadership role, the City and community engaged in difficult conversations and strategic actions to ensure a high quality of life for those who choose to live, work, visit and play in Temecula. The City’s commitment to strong fiscal stewardship and inclusiveness regardless of race, ethnicity, or ability, has helped the community to navigate through the pandemic and emerge even stronger. With a renewed strength and resolve to maintain our local control and high quality of life, Temecula is dedicated to building a resilient capital and social infrastructure and community support network. in 2010, the Blue Ribbon Committee appointees represent diverse geographic, demographic and economic interests of the City. The BRC held several meetings to review each Core Value, consider new data on population and economic trends, and to discuss evolving issues and conditions in Temecula that should be addressed in the updated QLMP. The QLMP process was supported by the consulting team of Applied Development Economics and Moore lacofano Goltsman, both California firms with extensive experience in long term strategic planning processes and community engagement. The Project team conducted an online survey of residents which supplemented the True North Survey and provided community input specifically on the QLMP Core Values and related issues. Other community outreach during the process included: • pop-up events in which the team set up booths at community events and solicited input from event participants. • A DeDICAteD projeCt Web pAge where members of the public could learn more about the QLMP 2040, watch video of each BRC meeting and stay engaged in the process. • publIC Workshops to engage the community, conducted both in person and online. CoMMunItY Input CoMMunItY surveY The City of Temecula regularly engages True North Research, Inc. to conduct community surveys of citizen satisfaction, priorities, and concerns on a variety of services that the City provides. True North uses a survey methodology that combines mail and telephone recruiting strategies with online data collection to ensure accessibility and statistically reliable samples. The most recent survey was conducted in Spring 2021. The results of the survey for topics relevant to the QLMP are provided throughout this document. publIC outreACh This update to the QLMP was developed through an extensive public outreach process and shaped by a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) appointed by the City Council. Similar to the first QLMP adopted ColleCtIng the DAtA for qlMp 2040 Executive Summary CITY OF TEMECULA 5 6 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 COREVALUES SAFE & PREPARED COMMUNITY Public safety is the foundation of Temecula and the most basic service for which the City is responsible. EQUITY Equity values help remove barriers to ensure opportunities for all to prosper through data- driven decisions personalized to residents of the City. TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY Transportation mobility, street maintenance and sanitation are basic but essential functions deemed highly important by residents. HEALTHY & LIVABLE CITY Opportunities for parks, recreation, cultural arts, programs and events for civic engagement help to define the great quality of life in Temecula.ECONOMIC PROSPERITY A business-friendly local economy providing diverse opportunities to live, work and play in Temecula. SUSTAINABLE & RESILIENT CITY Sustainable City values help plan for the future by meeting present needs without compromising the resources needed for future generations. ACCOUNTABLE & RESPONSIVE CITY GOVERNMENT Meeting requisite health and public safety needs while proactively seeking to enhance service delivery to the community and maintaining fiscal transparency and prudent stewardship of local resources. OUR 7 our 7 Core vAlues Each Core Value contributes to our overall quality of life. The diagram below is the compass by which we measure the strength of our goals as we develop the Citizen’s 20 Year Priorities Timeline to the right. Executive Summary 7 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 See Attached Timeline Where We Have Been Temecula grew from a small bedroom community to a regional center in its first 20 years, all the while maintaining a highly valued quality of life for its nearly 110,000 residents. Over the twelve years since the first QLMP was adopted, a number of systems have been put in place to protect and enhance the investments that were made during the City’s early years. The QLMP has been incorporated into the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget and its Annual Operating Budget (AOB). Increasingly, the focus is to ensure that the City is able to maintain the highest quality of services for its residents and that it is building its resiliency against all types of potential future disruptions, including economic, health, and natural disasters. As the City grows, Temecula can expect to experience continued demographic change, as well as continued innovations in communications, transportation tech- nologies, and in the ways work, life, and even shopping are conducted. The next section highlights some of the “Drivers of Change” the City has identified in its planning. The City anticipates private development will add more than 4,000 housing units by 2028, which will increase the population by more • Shifting demographics, with people over 65 the fastest growing population segment • Greater emphasis on health care delivery and mental health services • Increasingly diverse population in Temecula, with a wide range of needs for housing, employment and services • Evolving family structure, with more multi- generational households as well as single parent and single senior households • Greater emphasis on active transportation (biking and walking) and a wider variety of transportation options, particularly electric and micro mobility technologies than 12,000 residents. Many of these units will be pedestrian oriented multi-family housing in locations close to amenities such as the Jefferson Avenue Corridor, Old Town, and the Promenade Mall. Well-planned developments help to meet a variety of resident needs while protecting safety, providing smooth circulation, and offering access to the services, shopping and other amenities that are the foundation of Temecula’s high quality of life. Where We Are Going Setting the Stage • Variable work patterns • Evolving technology and increased internet access changing transportation systems and service delivery • Additional communication platforms and greater reliance on broadband infrastructure • Housing price pressure continuing to make it difficult for younger families and many local workers to stay in Temecula, increasing the need for smaller, less expensive (attainable) housing near amenities and services • Increasing effects of climate change, including extreme heat, wildfire risk and drought Drivers of Change over the next 20 Years Looking to the future CITY OF TEMECULA 9 10 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 paRks & ReC., open spaCe, haBitat & paRklands ■41 fully-equipped parks – 320 acres of developed parkland ■99% of residents within 3 miles of open space, 54% within walking distance ■7,000+ acres of open space, 29% in the City ■Eagle Soar Playground and Splash Pad. Safe and welcoming for children of all abilities ■ Annexed 4,200 acres of Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve (SMER) ■Update Community Services Master Plan ■Created an Urban Forest Master Plan ■4 Pump Tracks creating an action sports destination diVeRse eConomy ■5,600 businesses and 62,000 jobs ■Regional retail sector with over 4.5 million sq. ft. ■Top 13% in California retail sales generation ■Wine tourism drawing 3.1 million visitors annually and an economic engine in excess of $1.1 billion ■Over 2,900 hotel rooms in the Temecula area ■Pechanga Resort Casino ■Vibrant and Historic Old Town destination eduCation ■School District test scores rank in Top 20% in CA ■23 elementary schools recognized as “Gold Ribbon Schools” since 1995 ■Mt. San Jacinto College campus ■CSU San Marcos Temecula campus ■University of Redlands campus ■Accredited vocational, technical, and trade schools aRts & CultuRe ■Old Town Theater with 354 seats and The Merc with 48 seats ■Award-winning Professor Pennypickle’s Children’s Museum ■Two public libraries with state of the art technology ■Temecula History Museum tRanspoRtation ■$619.8 million in circulation improvements planned between 2022-2026 ■Old Town rated Very Walkable by Walk Score ■48 miles of trails and 74 miles of bike lanes, with a Bikeways and Trail Master Plan to add another 60 miles ■Future 17-mile loop trail health & safety ■Temecula Valley Hospital opened in 2013 ■Rated 16th in Public Safety nationwide ■Response times at 5 minutes or less ■Police Officer ratio more than 1 per 1,000 residents GoVeRnment seRViCes ■Excellence in Capital Improvement Program and Annual Operating Budget Awards annually since incorporation in 1989 ■20% budget reserve and 5% secondary reserve ■FY22-27 Capital Improvement Budget: $793.7M ■FY22-23 Annual Operating Budget/ General Fund: $103.4M ■178 Full-time employees ■Recreation and Community Services programs serving more than 18,000 annual participants ■1 Senior Center and 3 Community Centers with intergenerational programs state of the aRt CiViC CenteR ■LEED Certified ■Convention space for community functions and meetings ■Energy efficient facility utilizing electricity from a Southern California Edison solar project located in the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ■Emergency Operations Center Setting the Stage OurAccomplishments honoring our historic past while enhancing our community with the vision of a vibrant, modern city with a small town atmosphere CITY OF TEMECULA 11 12 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 CITY OF TEMECULASetting the Stage Our Aspirations for 2040 always pursuing the highest quality of life, something we call “the temecula way ” ■Continue to be one of the Safest Cities in the USA ■Facilitating a comprehensive human services delivery system that meets diverse needs across all age groups ■Recognized as a major “Destination” by the tourist and travel industry ■Supporting the fair and equitable treatment of all human beings in a just society ■Renowned for its entrepreneurial and creative economy, providing more quality jobs close to home for residents ■A City surrounded by unscarred natural terrain and bounded by the Escarpment and Wine Country, with pristine air quality ■Home to an expanding hospital offering state of the art medical and mental health care services ■Supportive of higher education, integrated with the Career Technical Education (CTE) programs offered at the high school level ■A family-oriented community with both a small town feel and urban amenities ■A City that continues to maintain pristine landscaping at parks, along roadways and at public facilities ■Protection of Wine Country from urban encroachment ■A City where local history is cherished, celebrated, and protected ■A City offering a healthy and active lifestyle for all, including seniors, veterans, and those with special needs ■A center of art, culture, heritage and lifelong learning opportunities ■Building a resilient community by minimizing impact to life, property and the environment from natural or man-made hazards and emergency situations by maintaining a high level of emergency management planning, facilities and technology, including coordination with regional partners ■Creating a safer community to include Murrieta Creek flood control improvements that also include trails on both banks and a major sports complex within the detention basin ■Aging commercial corridors revitalized into vibrant mixed use centers with a variety of housing types, access to transit and urban amenities ■An outdoor recreational environmental haven, with Temecula’s trails fully integrated with trails in Wine Country, the City of Murrieta and surrounding region ■A model for fiscal stewardship of the City’s assets, with opportunities for civic engagement and volunteerism ■A regional retail center offering higher-end shopping opportunities at the Promenade Mall and Old Town ■A great location for housing choices for all ages, incomes and needs, including for families, singles, seniors and those with special needs ■A platinum level bicycle-friendly community as recognized by the League of American Bicyclists ■Recognized as a major recreation center, offering competitive and training sites in Southern California for aquatics, tennis and other sports facilities ■A leader in sustainability and resilience, including renewable energy, innovative storm water management, urban forest and green waste management and fire safe hardening of the built environment ■A City with upgraded infrastructure, including enhanced connections from housing in the east to jobs in the west of Temecula, as well as improvements to I-15 and additional interchanges ■A vibrant Old Town Temecula that preserves its charming historic appeal 13 14 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 CITY OF TEMECULA 1 A SAFE AND PREPARED COMMUNITY1 COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY (>85%) progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) police protection Resident importance to maintain low crime rate 93.9% Resident satisfaction with Temecula's crime rate 79.6% Resident importance to provide neighborhood police patrols 76.0% Resident satisfaction with neighborhood police patrols 69.5% Resident satisfaction with enforcement of traffic laws 74.7% fire services Resident importance to provide fire protection and prevention services 92.0% Resident satisfaction with fire protection and prevention services 96.5% Resident importance to provide emergency paramedic services 95.6% Resident satisfaction with emergency paramedic services 94.6% it is impoRtant to addRess and pReVent Both the Reality and peRCeption of disoRdeR within the Community. A safe community is one that has low crime rates; responsive police, fire and emergency services; safe routes of travel for pedestrians, and those on bikes; well-publicized emergency evacuation routes; well-maintained proper- ties and spaces; and a strong sense of community that enhances the perception and experience of safety and well-being. The City’s approach to police protection continues to evolve to meet the ever- changing needs of its residents and businesses. The City has implemented Community Policing which provides for continuity in police personnel so they can build relationships with the neighborhoods they patrol. The City has established the Old Town Metro Team, which is comprised of dedicated deputies who provide added engagement with business owners, employees, visitors, and residents of the Old Town area. The deployment of the team helps improve enforcement efforts and enhance relationships with the community and visitors on a daily basis. 1CoRe Value A Safe & PreparedCommunity Sustaining a safe community is the city’s most important obligation. the community’s perception of safety and security is critical to its quality of life 15 16 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 A SAFE AND PREPARED COMMUNITY1 MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent fire protection and emergency services (Source: City Data) Effective response time for fire protection: Goals: 5 minutes or less, 90%+ of the time; "Progressing " is 80-89% of the time; "Needs Improvement" is less than 80% of the time 90% of response times (2021) Effective response time for ambulance, emergency services: Goals: 10 minutes or less; "Progressing " is 10-12 minutes; "Needs Improvement" is > 12 minutes Less than 10 minutes ISO Fire Insurance Rating: Goal: <3 ISO rating; "Progressing" is 3-3.5 ISO rating; "Needs Improvement" is 4+ ISO rating 3.5 Rating emergency preparedness (Source: City Data) Number of citizens trained in CPR, First Aid and healthcare provider CPR and Stop the Bleed program: Goal 850 per year; "Progressing" is 500-850 per year; "Needs Improvement" is <500 per year 633 Number of citizens trained in Community Emergency Response Team Training (CERT): Goal 175 per year; "Progressing " is 100-175 per year; "Needs Improvement" is <100 per year 139 Number of new enrollees per year in the mass notification system: Goal: 7,000 (20%) households per year; "Progressing" is 3,500- 7,000 (10-20%); "Needs Improvement" is <3,500 (10%) 3,000 registrants Number of partnerships developed with key community stakeholders – public and private partners, non-profits, tribal government, community groups, faith-based organizations, and schools – to enhance emergency preparedness, response and recovery within the City of Temecula. Goal=7-10, "Progressing” is 4-6; "Needs Improvement" is <4 7 traffic safety (Source: CA Office of Traffic Safety) Overall traffic safety for driving, cycling, walking: CA Office of Traffic Safety rating for cities with 100,000-250,000 populations: Goal: to rank in the top 10 cities; "Progressing” is in the top 11-20 cities; "Needs Improvement" is 20+ cities ranking Ranks #21 Graffiti abatement (City Data) Remove graffiti within 24 hours: Goal: 90% of the time; "Progressing" is 80-89% of the time; "Needs Improvement" is 79% or less of the time 59.1% MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent police protection (Source: City Data) Number of Police Officers: Goal is 1 officer per 1,000 residents "Progressing" is 0.90-0.99 per 1,000 residents, and "Needs Improvement" is less than .90 officers per 1,000 residents More than 1 officer per 1,000 residents Average response time for police for Priority I Crimes: Goal: 5 minutes or less "Progressing" is 5-6 minutes response, and "Needs Improvement" is more than 6 minutes* 4.96 minutes average response time (2021) Violent and property Crime (Source: City and FBI Data) FBI rating for Safest Cities in America: Goal: Be in the top ten; "Progressing” is 11-25 safest cities; "Needs Improvement" is 25+ safest cities Ranked 16th safest city in America Number of violent crimes per 100,000 residents: Goal: decreasing crimes more than 2.5%; "Progressing” is no increase in crimes (0-2.5%); "Needs Improvement" is increase in crimes more than 2.5% 166 crimes per 100,000 population, up from 153 in 2010 (3.5% increase) Number of property crimes per 100,000 residents: Goal: decreasing crimes more than 2.5%; "Progressing” is no increase in crimes (0-2.5%); "Needs Improvement" is increase in crimes more than 2.5% 2,626 crimes per 100,000, down from 2,834 in 2010 (7.3% decrease) * Priority I calls are those which require immediate response, and there is no reason to believe that an immediate threat to life exists. The Old Town Metro Team is supported by Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, and Fire Inspection personnel, so health and safety issues can be addressed proactively. The City also participates in the Community Behavioral Health Assessment Team (CBAT) that includes social workers and mental health professionals. The City has a very effective Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) with the mission to connect homeless individuals with services as well as to enforce the law. Communities and residents also need to be well prepared for natural and other disasters, as wildfires in the region have shown, with effective emergency communications and response systems. The City has hired an Emergency Manager and plans to undertake the creation of a comprehensive Emergency Management Master Plan. Important elements of this planning process include upgrading the City’s Emergency Operations center (EOC), establishing secondary/alternate EOCs, upgrading the technology used by the public safety communications system and establishing citywide Shelter in Place and Mass Evacuation Plans. In addition, training citizens to increase resiliency in case of emergency is an extremely effective strategy and remains an ongoing priority for the Fire Department and the Office of Emergency Management. Safe & PreparedCommunity 17 18 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 A SAFE AND PREPARED COMMUNITY1 Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments ■Renovations to Fire Station 84 located on Pauba Road. This renovation will include a new state of the art training facility to ensure our community is prepared. This training room will also give classroom space to ensure the personnel at the station stay update on training and education. The City will add a fireman’s gym to the facility as well as several other renovations ■Over the next two years, complete an addition to Fire Station 73 to add two additional bays to store the Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) and medical squad/swift water rescue vehicle. This addition will also include adding a gym to the facility ■Introduce new pre-planning programs and training tools for the Fire Department. The City of Temecula strives to be on the cutting edge on ways to respond to emergency incidents ■Implemented community policing which provides for continuity in police personnel so they can build relationships with the neighborhoods they patrol ■Established the Metro Team, which includes Sheriff’s Deputies supported by Code Enforcement, Building and Safety, and Fire Inspection personnel so that crime prevention can be addressed in a proactive and holistic approach ■Participation in the Community Behavioral Health Assessment Team (CBAT) that includes social workers and mental health professionals ■Very effective Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) with the mission to connect homeless individuals with services as well as to gain compliance with the law ■Purchased a new ladder truck in 2021 ■Installed personal thermal imaging cameras for every seat on each of Temecula’s fire engines and truck companies ■Filled the Emergency Manager position to run the Office of Emergency Management ■Expansion of Old Town Police Station ■Acquire Fire Station 12 from the state and update it to be a state of the art fire station that will continue to serve the Old Town area ■A new fire training facility ■Monitor need for a second ladder truck if highrise development intensifies ■Continuous updates to Emergency Preparedness and Response Plans, and upgrades to technologies at the City’s existing Emergency Operation Centers (EOCs) located at City Hall and the Library ■Implement Emergency Preparedness Programs to train citizens to be prepared in case of an emergency ■Wildfire Mitigation Fuel Management Program ■Neighborhood and City Facility Fire Hardening Program Prevention strategies are a more effective and a more cost-efficient means of sustaining a safe and secure community. This includes creating an attractive, stimulating, and safe environment for teens and young adults. Residents also expressed their desire to travel safely throughout the City on various modes of travel, including bike, pedestrian, equestrian trails and on complete streets. ■Continue to be one of the safest cities in California and the nation ■Ensure that funding for public safety remains the highest priority ■Maintain a ratio of one police officer per 1,000 population ■Support community oriented policing and maximize community leadership in public safety ■Achieve a City ISO rating of 1.0 (i.e. most exemplary level) ■Maintain a five minute or less response time for fire protection ■Minimize impact to life, property and the environment from natural hazards and emergency situations by maintaining a high level of emergency management planning, facilities and technology, including coordination with regional partners ■Provide recreational and other activities for youth that promote socially productive behavior ■Provide effective enforcement of City zoning, building, fire and grading codes, and graffiti abatement ■Continue to provide a high-level of public information and training for the community surrounding emergency management and public safety Our Goals for 2040 investment in public safety is the highest priority for the residents of temecula Safe & PreparedCommunity 20 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 CITY OF TEMECULA TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY22CoRe Value TransportationMobility&Connectivity tRanspoRtation moBility & ConneCtiVity means providing all residents with access to good jobs, housing choices and neighborhoods, quality schools and medical facilities, shopping, restaurants, recreation and the goods and services that make a city desirable and livable. Western Riverside County and the City of Temecula have grown rapidly over the past twenty years with high levels of population growth projected to continue. While local and regional policies emphasize development of more quality jobs within the City and region for Temecula’s residents, many must commute to jobs elsewhere, including San Diego County. These factors lead to long commutes, traffic congestion, air pollution, and strains on work/life balance. Congestion and travel delay add up to significant costs in lost productivity for businesses and increased costs for both households and employers. Temecula is located at a major regional crossroads in Southern California, and much of the traffic through the City is not locally generated. The City must collaborate with regional partners, including both Riverside County and San Diego County to address regional traffic patterns and mitigations. COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) local streets and Roads maintenance Resident importance to maintain local streets and roads 94.1% Resident satisfaction with maintenance of local streets and roads 70.7% traffic Congestion Resident satisfaction with efforts to improve traffic circulation by improving roads, intersections, signal timing and other measures 60.1% Resident importance of coordinating traffic signals 80.7% Resident satisfaction with coordinating traffic signals 71.4% Resident satisfaction with emergency paramedic services 94.6% transportation mobility means moving people and goods efficiently, safely and cost effectively throughout the community and region with well-planned networks 21 22 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY2 MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent local streets and Roads maintenance (Source: City Data) Goal: Ensure that 75% of City’s lane miles meet or exceed PCI (Pavement Condition Index) of 70 70% meet standards transportation Congestion/Circulation (Source: City Data) Goal: Ensure 85% of intersections along the roadway network defined by the Circulation Element of the General Plan operate at Level of Service “D” or better √ Goal: Ensure 90% of the road segments along the roadway network defined by the Circulation Element of the General Plan operate at Level of Service “D” or better √ Bike trails, pathways & walkability (Source: Temecula Bikeways and Trails Master Plan; City Public Works) Goal: Complete 80 miles of Bike Lanes 74 miles or 92.5% completed Goal: Complete 60 miles of Multipurpose trails 48 miles or 80% completed Goal: Maintain a "Very Walkable" rating for Old Town; 70-89 is a rating of “Very Walkable” based on Walk Score Rating: 78 Goal: Maintain a "Walkable" rating for Citywide average; 50-69 is a rating of “Walkable” based on Walk Score; less than 50 is very car dependent Rating: 29 Goal: A Gold Level Bicycle-Friendly Community; “Needs Improvement” is bronze; “Progressing” is silver; “Meets/ Exceed Goals” is gold Bronze Goal: Higher People for Bikes City Rating; “Needs Improvement” is 0-30; “Progressing” is 31-60; “Meets/Exceed s Goals” is 61-80 28 transit (Source: Riverside Transit Agency) Goal: Increase transit ridership by 5%11.4% increase Goal: Increase inter-regional transit ridership by 5%3.6% increase COMMUNITY SURVEY CONTINUED topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) Bike trails, pathways, walkability Resident importance to maintain local streets and roads 94.1% Resident satisfaction with maintenance of local streets and roads 70.7% transit Resident importance of providing local public transportation and shuttle services 45.8% Resident satisfaction with local public transportation and shuttle services 73.2% Rating of Resident spending priorities (medium and high priorities) Make infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation 93.2% Advocate to State, Federal Depts of Transportation to improve traffic circulation on I-15 91.7% Expand and improve the network of bicycling, pedestrian, recreational trails 62.9% Build additional park-n-ride lots for carpoolers 34.3% in the tRue noRth suRVey, residents expressed a strong desire to reduce traffic. In the upcoming General Plan Update, the City will adopt a new Circulation Element, which will provide an opportunity to identify ways to better manage traffic throughout the City. In 2022, the City has engaged in the development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) which is identifying high accident locations for both auto travel and bicycles/pedestrians. The City is studying further ways to integrate technology into the local transportation system to improve traffic flow and provide a foundation for the potential transition to autonomous vehicles and other new forms of mobility. Encouragement of micro mobility options, e-bikes, and scooters, in addition to further implementation of the Bikeways and Trails Master Plan, will help reduce vehicle trips in some areas of town. As stated by members of the Blue Ribbon Committee, “Let’s move people, not cars.” Options to improve transit connections as well as creating new options such as light rail travel may be explored. TransportationMobility&Connectivity 23 24 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY2 TransportationMobility&Connectivity Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments ■Temecula Parkway Interchange ■French Valley Parkway Improvements, Phase 1 ■Established Asset Management Fund for a variety of capital expenditures ■Adopted Local Road Safety Plan ■Updated the Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan ■Completed a Sidewalk Gap Study ■Freeway Landscape Beautification & I-15 Gateway Monuments ■Auxiliary lanes both directions on I-15 ■French Valley Parkway Phases 2 and 3 Improvements to I-15: 2 add’l NB and SB lanes and overpass at French Valley Parkway ■Initiate regional transportation discussions with Riverside and San Diego Counties for all transportation improvement options ■Tourism Transit Line linking Old Town, Wine Country and Pechanga, plus Park & Rides ■Additional Parking Structures in Old Town ■Improve Shade Structures at Bus Stops ■Increase park and ride facilities ■Median Enhancement and Street Revitalization ■Overland Bridge extension over Murrieta Creek ■Ynez Road widening north of Santiago Road ■Nicolas Road extension from Calle Girasol to Butterfield Stage Road ■Roundabout at Jedediah Smith & De Portola Road ■Implement Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) System ■Support walkable and transit- oriented neighborhoods with accessible commercial services ■Maintain and improve our roadway network so that the flow of traffic is efficient ■Promote job growth in Temecula and nearby areas to reduce commuting and market the opportunities to work and shop locally to residents ■Expand and enhance the transportation network by completing missing links with appropriately sized streets ■Establish a connected pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian transportation system consistent with the Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan ■Coordinate land use and transportation to create a balanced, modern, integrated transportation system ■Increase transportation and mobility options ■Develop a Complete Streets Policy document ■Additional public Electric Vehicle (EV) charging stations Our Goals for 2040 THE CITY’S TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY & CONNECTIVITY GOALS FOR 2040 ADDRESS INFRASTRUCTURE, TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM BUILDING, SERVICE LEVELS AND JOB CREATION IN TEMECULA AND THE SURROUNDING AREA THE CITY AND REGIONAL AGENCIES ARE MAkING CONTINUAL INVESTMENT IN TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE. MANY OF THE PROJECTS TAkE MULTIPLE YEARS TO COME TO FRUITION, AND COMPETITION FOR SCARCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES wILL BE A CHALLENGE CITY OF TEMECULA 25 26 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 HEALTHY & LIVABLE CITY3 COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) overall Quality of life Resident satisfaction with Overall Quality of Life 87.6% Resident importance of providing senior services 71.2% Resident satisfaction with senior services 81.7% Resident importance of providing teen services 62.8% Resident satisfaction with growth management and planning: commercial/ residential 79.7% (Commercial) 51.7% (Residential) 3CoRe Value Healthy & Livable City 27 28 developed and the hospital now has plans to expand, including a new Behavioral Health facility. The hospital is working to attract new doctors to serve the growing population and to provide an expanding range of services. Barriers that many employers experience are high housing costs in Temecula. Through its 6th cycle Housing Element and other programs, the City is striving to create more “Attainable Housing” in the community. This is housing that is affordable to working people so that workers can live close to their jobs in Temecula. healthy & liVaBle Cities are characterized by high levels of civic pride, community engagement and a strong sense of place. Increasingly, livability and community health also are synonymous with sustainability. Maintaining health means not only having access to high quality health care, but also the facilities and services needed to maintain an active and healthy lifestyle, such as parks and trails. The completion of the Temecula Valley Hospital was a major goal of the QLMP 2010, and was accomplished early in the decade. A network of health services has A HEALTHY AND LIVABLE CITY ENCOMPASSES ELEMENTS THAT REPRESENT A HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE: BUILT AND NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, ECONOMIC AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES, ACCESS TO CULTURAL, RELIGIOUS, RECREATIONAL, SHOPPING, AND ENTERTAINMENT RESOURCES, AND THE ABILITY TO HAVE A HEALTHY AND SAFE LIFESTYLE CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 HEALTHY & LIVABLE CITY3 COMMUNITY SURVEY CONTINUED topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) parks and Recreation Resident satisfaction with the variety of parks and recreation facilities 90.8% education, Civic and Cultural amenities Resident importance of providing cultural arts, public art, theater and museum services 62.1% Resident satisfaction with library services 90.5% Resident satisfaction with the quality of education of Temecula Valley Unified School District 85.4% Rating of Resident spending priorities For improved appearance of public infrastructure and landscapes 68.2% Expand Teen services and programs 68.4% Develop high quality arts, culture, history and sporting events and facilities 67.9% Increase recreational programs 67.4% MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent health indicators (Source: Strategic Health Alliance Pursuing Equity (SHAPE) Riverside County) Asthma (Goal: <8.4%; “Progressing” 8.4- 9.5%; “Needs Improvement” >9.5%)8.5% Adults with Diabetes (Goal: 10%; “Progressing” 10-13%; “Needs Improvement” 13%+) 7.5% Adults Who are Sedentary (Goal: 21.2%; “Progressing” 21.2-29.6%; “Needs Improvement” >29.6) 19.3% Poor Mental Health (Goal:<13.2%;”Progressing” 13.2 - 16.1%; “Needs Improvement”>16.1%) 13.3% parks & Recreation (Source: Community Services Master Plan; City Bike-Ped Counts) Developed parklands: Goal: 5 acres per 1,000 residents; “Progressing” is 3.0- 4.9 acres per 1,000 residents; “Need Improvement” is <3.0 acres per 1,000 residents) 2.8 acres Accessible Parks: Percent of population within 15 minute walk of a neighborhood park: Goal: 85%; “Progressing” is 70-84%; “Needs Improvement” is <70% 54% Pedestrian Use of Trails: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease Increasing Bicyclist Use of Trails Increase: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease Increasing arts, Culture & lifelong learning (Source: TCSD facility participation counts) Library Use: Goal: Circulation greater than 700,000; “Progressing” is Circulation between 500,000 and 699,000; “Needs Improvement” is Circulation of 499,000 or less 559,230 Circulation Visit to City Museums: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease Increasing Old Town Community Theater Ticket Sales: Goal: Increase; “Progressing” is steady level; “Needs Improvement” is a decrease Increasing and entertainment, but it is evident in normal everyday life that the ability of a place to nurture its residents spirits as well as their material needs is an essential aspect of livability. The City’s open spaces, libraries, museums, cultural and performance venues, places of worship and entertainment spots provide a rich contribution to community life that is highly valued by its residents. the Blue RiBBon Committee is espeCially CoGnizant of the importance of addressing mental health, and this QLMP includes a measure of mental health in Temecula from the Strategic Health Alliance Pursuing Equity or “SHAPE” Riverside County health surveys. The experience of the COVID pandemic certainly reinforced the critical importance of avenues for social interaction Healthy &Livable City 29 30 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 HEALTHY & LIVABLE CITY3 Healthy &Livable City ■Support healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs, parks, trails and competitive facilities for swimming, tennis, soccer, baseball, basketball, and other sports, including action sports ■Be a sustainable community that embraces residents’ quality of life through protect- ing the natural environment, maintaining the City’s fiscal health, and supporting the community’s health and equity ■Be a diverse community that values and supports people of all ages, backgrounds, cultures, disabilities and religious beliefs ■Provide accessible sports, recreational, cultural, health/therapeutic and community engagement facilities, programs and resources for all Temecula residents, including seniors, youth, families and those with special needs ■Enhance Temecula’s position as a regional medical center of excellence, offering advanced medical specialties and research facilities, and a sufficient ratio of physicians to residents ■Value the growth of non-profit organizations, churches, temples, mosques, and other places of worship ■Continue to be a community where local history is remembered and respected, and local culture and artistic creativity is supported Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments Our Goals for 2040 ■Expansion of Temecula Valley Hospital, including Behavioral Health facility ■Ensure a variety of housing choices for different life stages ■Phase Old Town into a mixed-use residential and culturally rich downtown ■Integrate and expand Teen facilities and services at the Community Recreation Center ■Explore mobile library resource vans to extend service more evenly throughout the City ■Temecula Valley Hospital ■Community Services Master Plan ■Western Escarpment Acquisition Completed ■State of the art technology for Temecula Library ■Eagles Soar Inclusive Needs Play Structure and Splash Pad ■Friendship Park with inclusive play structures for children of all abilities ■Replacement of multiple themed and enhanced new playgrounds citywide ■Built four pump tracks at various city parks ■Create Uptown Temecula Regional Sports Park ■Murrieta Creek Trail, Phase III ■Lake Skinner Trail via Metropolitan Water District easement ■Rehab Existing Tennis Facilities ■New Gym ■Additional pickle ball courts ■Become Gold Level Bicycle Friendly Community ■Open trails at the Roripaugh Preserve 3CORE VALUE AT ITS CORE, RESIDENTS DESIRE THAT TEMECULA BE A PLACE wHERE THEY CAN LIVE THROUGH THE ARC OF THEIR ENTIRE LIVES, wITH HOUSING AND SERVICES FOR ALL AGES, INCOMES AND ABILITIES – A CITY THAT ALLOwS EACH RESIDENT TO LIVE LIFE TO THEIR FULLEST AND MOST SATISFYING POTENTIAL 31 32 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY4 COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) employment and shopping Resident satisfaction with City's promotion of job development 72.0% Resident satisfaction with City's efforts to satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities 88.1% Rating of Resident spending priorities (medium to high priority) Encourage the upkeep and rehabilitation of existing commercial centers 76.8% Provide incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the city 76.2% Attract or expand institutions of higher learning, such as a college or university 65.9% Revitalize Jefferson Corridor and other outdated commercial areas of the city 64.6% Encourage the development of affordable housing 51.3% in today’s eConomy, highly skilled workers can perform their jobs almost anywhere; these workers are seeking communities that provide a high quality of life. Desirable communities such as Temecula possess a wide range of housing opportunities, quality schools, efficient transportation networks, parks and accessible open space, a variety of shopping and entertainment opportunities, cultural arts, accessibility to high speed telecommunications, excellent healthcare, and institutions of higher learning. 4CoRe Value Economic Prosperity A THRIVING, RESILIENT AND ADAPTABLE LOCAL ECONOMY IS THE FOUNDATION FOR TEMECULA’S LONG-TERM PROSPERITY AND CONTRIBUTES DIRECTLY TO THE HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE ENJOYED BY RESIDENTS CITY OF TEMECULA 33 34 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY4 temeCula’s Residents haVe expRessed a stRonG desiRe to Be aBle to liVe and woRk in temeCula, and to have more diverse and well-paying jobs available. They also want their children to be able to find meaningful work and affordable housing so they too can live and work in Temecula as they become young adults. Echoing residents’ concern for their children’s future job opportunities, the Blue Ribbon Committee highlighted the need to foster the Career Technical Education (CTE) system in the community. Temecula was fortunate that Mt. San Jacinto College (MSJC) acquired the former Abbott office campus. The new MSJC Temecula campus has further expansion potential and opportunities to merge CT curriculums at the high schools with MSJC programs to provide local students the opportunities to train for vocational jobs in Temecula. Further coordination with CSU San Marcos will also help to extend these workforce training and education opportunities to the four year degree level. The City is especially interested in fostering entrepreneurial opportunities. The Temecula Valley Entrepreneur’s Exchange (TVE2) is a business incubator and regional resource center managed by the City’s Economic Development Division that fosters business growth and economic vitality for entrepreneurs and early stage companies by providing access to low cost commercial space, technology, high quality resources, and leveraging a strong network of community partners located at the TVE2, including the Small Business Development Center (SBDC), the Economic Development Coalition (EDC), and Riverside County Workforce Development. Residents closely associate the presence of independent, locally-owned businesses with the City’s cherished small town atmosphere and the TVE2 is actively supporting new start-up small businesses to succeed in Temecula. Temecula features a number of strong business sectors that offer a wide range of job opportunities, as well as help to support City revenues and quality services. The biomedical cluster employs thousands in healthcare and manufacturing of medical devices. The tourism industry attracts sales exceeding $1.1 billion annually, anchored by the Pechanga Resort Casino and Temecula Valley Wine Country with more than 45 wineries, marketed through Visit Temecula Valley. The retail sector is especially strong, ranking Temecula in the top 13% sales tax generators in the State. The City has committed to growing these and other economic opportunities to benefit its residents, workforce and sales tax revenue funds that support enhanced infrastructure and public safety in Temecula. EconomicProsperity MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent employment (Source: American Community Survey: ACS)95%+93-95%<93% Annual Employment Rate: Goal: 95%+; “progressing” is 93-95%; “Needs Improvement” is <93% 96% household income (Source: ACS)increasing stable decreasing Household Income: Goal: Annual Increase; “Progressing” is stable; “Needs Improvement” is annual decrease 1.5% increase housing and development (Source: CA Assn. of Realtors; ACS; SW Riv. Co. Assn of Realtors; City Bldg. permit data) Housing Affordability Index: Goal: More than 65% for Riverside County 33.0% Housing Options: Goal: 65% single family; “Progressing” is 66-75%; “Needs Improvement” is >75% 78.5% Residential Building Permits: Goal: Increase 332% increase Commercial Building Permits: Goal: Increase 21.5% decrease Vacancy Rates: Commercial Buildings (SW Riverside Region): Goal: <10%; “Progressing” is 10-15%; “Needs Improvement” is >15% 15.7% (Office) 19.2% (Retail) Vacancy Rates: Industrial Buildings (SW Riverside Region): Goal: 5-7%; “Progressing” is 8-10%; “Needs Improvement” is >10%) 18.4% sales taxes (Source: CA Dept. of Tax & Fees)top 15%top 16-25%less than top 25% Per Capita Sales Tax Goal: Be in the top 15% among State agencies; “Progressing” is in top 16-25%; “Needs Improvement” is > 25% of agencies Ranking is 13% tourism (Source: City Data) Hotel Occupancy Rates: Goal: 70%; “Progressing” is 50-69%; “Needs Improvement” is <50%) 67.5% Transient Occupancy Tax Revenues: Goal: >5% annual increase; “Progressing” is 1-5% increase; “Needs Improvement” is annual decrease 24% increase Broadband access for Business (City Staff Data)100%70-99%<70% Broadband access for business: Goal: 100%; “Progressing” is 70-99%; “Needs Improvement” is <70% 80.0% 35 36 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 ECONOMIC PROSPERITY4 ■Provide an entrepreneurial culture that offers a growing number of diverse high-paying jobs in innovative and global companies, including those in the bio-medical cluster and other sectors ■Encourage the broadening of higher education opportunities both public and private ■Foster an integrated Career Technical Education (CTE) system that builds on curricula offered through Temecula Valley Unified School District, Mt. San Jacinto College and the CSU San Marcos urban campus at Temecula ■Continue to protect the City’s special natural resources – air quality, open space and parklands, wine country, and clean water – that provide a special quality of place Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments Our Goals for 2040 ■Launched and expanded TVE2 as a City’s business resource center and business incubator for entrepreneurs and businesses to include the presence of the SBDC, EDC and Riverside County Workforce providing tools and resources for a successful business ■Launched and continue to grow annual college and vocational fair hosted at Promenade Temecula, which also supports retail sales ■Produce new marketing materials and outreach campaigns each year to educate the community, promote existing Temecula businesses, and attract new companies to Temecula ■Uptown Temecula Specific Plan ■Opening of Mt. San Jacinto College Temecula Campus (MSJC), Cal State University San Marcos at Temecula, and the University of Redlands satellite campus ■Selected as the US Small Business Administration’s Community of Excellence recipient ■Created and implemented workforce programs, including the City’s intern program and an extern program that matches students with Temecula businesses 37 38 EconomicProsperity 4CoRe Value CITY OF TEMECULA ■Pursue long-term economic diversification for job creation ■Support the retail sector’s adaptation to a changing marketplace ■Nurture small businesses and regionally unique commercial uses ■Encourage development and activities that attract visitors and conventioneers ■Cultivate an entrepreneurial and academic environment ■Promote and protect the City’s brand as “Southern California’s Wine Country” ■Continue implementation of Uptown Temecula for Jefferson Avenue area revitalization ■Attract luxury hotels and a convention center ■Support Old Town’s revitalization as it evolves to protect its charm and historic appeal ■Continue support of the Pechanga Tribe and their ongoing development of upscale luxury resort(s) and entertainment ■Foster Career Technical Education in support of high school and MSJC curricula DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 the city’s overall economic goals are to create a high value, high growth and diversified economic base, increase access to higher education, expand cte opportunities offered through temecula valley unified school district and local colleges that are matched to the needs of local businesses and generate revenues to maintain important infrastructure and services like roads, parks and libraries. the city will also need to define and advance its goals for economic prosperity within the broader context of the regional economy 39 SUSTAINABLE & RESILIENT CITY55CoRe Value Sustainable & Resilient City focused on the concept of resiliency, which is to harden the built environment, and creating more redundant and efficient backup systems for energy, communi- cations, banking, etc. when disasters occur. This concept is inherent in the City’s efforts to prepare for emergencies as discussed in the Safe and Prepared Community Core Value, but it is also intrinsically connected to long term efforts to manage the incremental environmental effects of climate change. a sustainaBle City is one that conducts its daily business and plans for the future dedicated to these principles and en- courages and promotes residents and businesses to adopt sustainable practices. A sustainable city also focuses on the inter- connectedness of three vital systems – a prosperous economy, a healthy environment, and an equitable community – "the three E’s." Facing the increasing effects of climate change, communities are also becoming A SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY USES ITS RESOURCES TO MEET CURRENT NEEDS wHILE ENSURING THAT ADEQUATE RESOURCES ARE AVAILABLE FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS. IT SEEkS IMPROVED PUBLIC HEALTH AND BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE FOR ALL ITS RESIDENTS BY LIMITING wASTE, PREVENTING POLLUTION, MAXIMIZING CONSERVATION AND PROMOTING EFFICIENCY, AND DEVELOPING RESOURCES TO REVITALIZE THE LOCAL ECONOMY Sustainability can be defined in many ways. The following definition captures Temecula’s most commonly held concepts: CITY OF TEMECULA 40 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 SUSTAINABLE & RESILIENT CITY5 MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent air Quality (Source: South Coast AQMD) Ozone: Maximum 8 hr. concentration in ppm: Goal: .07 ppm; Progressing: <.085 0.091 (2020) energy use and Clean energy Generation (Source: So. Cal. Edison and City Data) City facilities energy usage baseline: Goal: Decreasing Trend √ Community-wide energy usage baseline: Goal: Reduction per capita √ Kilowatts/megawatts of renewable energy generated: Goal: Increasing trend √ open space, natural habitat and parks (Source: Community Services Master Plan) Preserved open space: Goal: 30% of City in parks and open space 29.0% waste Reduction (Source: City Data) 2010 State baseline of 7.5 lbs daily waste per person: Goal: Exceed State baseline 4.8 lbs per person Consistent with SB 1383, provide organics collection service to all residents and businesses √ water usage Reduction/Quality (source: Rancho California water district; City data) Community usage of potable water (non- agricultural): Goal: Decrease in usage Down 27% City facilities baseline usage of water: Goal: Decrease in usage √ Goal: Reduction of urban runoff - decrease √ Goal: Improved water quality in creeks √ COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) waste Reduction Resident importance to provide reliable garbage and recycling services 88.7% Resident satisfaction with City's efforts to provide reliable garbage and recycling services 91.5% open space Resident importance to acquire and protect open space 78.0% Resident satisfaction with City efforts to acquire and protect open space 70.4% in a number of actions to improve the efficiency of resource use and to protect environmental quality in the community. In addition, the City’s municipal utility and service partners, including Southern California Edison, the Rancho California Water District, and CR&R Environmental Services (solid waste) have also imple- mented a number of sustainability and resiliency measures. The City can also coordinate with the many regional, state and federal agencies and organizations working on resiliency and environmental quality. the City will CReate a Climate Action Plan (CAP), as required by state law, when it updates its General Plan in 2023-2025. The CAP will create a scientific baseline for Temecula of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and climate change risks. It will create metrics and adaptation strategies the community can use to reduce its impact on the environment. It is important to recognize the need for a commitment to adaptive management and a science-based approach to developing future strategies for both sustainability and resiliency. when we measuRe ouR pRoGRess, we can see that the City has engaged Sustainable& Resilient City 41 42 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 37 38 SUSTAINABLE & RESILIENT CITY5 ■Be the most sustainable city in Southern California – one that uses local resources effectively and efficiently; protects the City’s residents and environment; develops a more diverse, green and competitive economy, and improves the livability and quality of life for all its residents ■Ensure safe and sufficient water supplies for the 21st century, through continued conservation (reduced per capita use and recycling), infrastructure improvements, and protection of 100 year floodplains in their natural state ■Work to maintain the City’s high level of air quality possible in Temecula ■Develop community resiliency in infrastructure, the economy, around natural resources, and hazard mitigation ■Adopt a Climate Action Plan (CAP) as part of the General Plan update and Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments Our Goals for 2040 ■Urban Forest Management Plan ■Bicycle and Trails Master Plan ■Green Streets Program ■Alternative Compliance Program for Stormwater Management ■Solar Facility at the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve (SMER) ■Early implementation of SB 1383, Organics Recycling, and utilization of CR&Rs anaerobic digester ■Storm Water Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan ■Continued implementation of SB 1383 for green waste composting ■Incorporate the concept of Greenway Planning and “Green Infrastructure” into the General Plan ■Public education on energy efficiency, including solar, recycling and water conservation ■Integrated Watershed Management Plan ■Increase available electric vehicle (EV) charging stations ■Expand multi-modal transit options ■Promote a high level of green waste recycling and composting among residents and businesses ■Develop a City-wide Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 5CoRe ValueSustainable& Resilient City MANY OF THE THINGS THAT RESIDENTS VALUE MOST ABOUT LIVING IN TEMECULA ARE DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE PRISTINE ENVIRONMENT; THE CITY’S PICTURESQUE VISTAS, OPEN SPACE, SURROUNDING MOUNTAINS, FRESH wATER, AND CLEAN AIR CITY OF TEMECULA 43 44 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 ACCOUNTABLE & RESPONSIVE CITY GOVERNMENT66CoRe Value Accountable & ResponsiveCity Government An accountable and responsive City govern- ment is one that sets a standard for excellence in the governance of the City. It embodies leadership that is accessible to residents, businesses and employees; transparent in its temeCula Residents aRe deeply Com- mitted to theiR Community and a reliable two-way communication effort from their City government that provides information on issues vital to this relationship. TEMECULA’S STRENGTH IS ITS PEOPLE. THE CITY IS SUCCESSFUL TODAY BECAUSE OF HARD-wORkING, COMMUNITY-MINDED RESIDENTS wHO HAVE SHAPED THE CITY AND HAVE CHOSEN TEMECULA TO BE THEIR HOME. AS A RESULT, THE CITY OPERATES UNDER A THEME OF “BUILDING GREATNESS, MAINTAINING EXCELLENCE ” COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) Quality of life Resident satisfaction with Quality of Life 88% Resident satisfaction with municipal services 83% Resident satisfaction with community facilities and programs 85% waste Reduction Resident satisfaction with the services the City is providing 84.7% Resident importance of providing online access to City services, information, and resources 75.0% Resident satisfaction with providing online access to City services, information, and resources 85.6% Community involvement Resident satisfaction with the City's efforts to communicate with residents through newsletters, the Internet, social media, and other means 69.4% Resident importance of providing special events, Fourth of July Parade, summer concerts 58.4% CITY OF TEMECULA 45 46 DRAFT 10/6 DRAFT 10/6 ACCOUNTABLE & RESPONSIVE CITY GOVERNMENT6 decision making; committed to the effective and efficient delivery of services that the community most values; and is a steward of the City’s human and fiscal resources. An accountable and responsive City govern- ment demonstrates a culture of servant leadership that helps the community navigate through change. It also provides an opportunity for residents to be engaged and involved in their community. In its 30+ years as a City, Temecula’s City government, in partnership with residents, has set high standards for excellence and clear priorities that have made Temecula a great place to live, work and play. The City strives to balance these aspirations with the realities of resource constraints and competing demands, guided by deliberative processes that involve listening to the community, setting clear and achievable goals, making prudent investments, being adaptive to changing conditions, and assessing outcomes to improve future performance. MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent fiscal operations (Source: City Annual Operating Budget) Cost per capita of City operating budget: Goal: Maintain or reduce annual net per capita cost $938.46 General Fund Reserve 25% Revenues (source: City annual operating Budget) Sales tax per capita: Goal: Increase annually; "Needs Improvement" decrease annually charge 3.9% Transient Occupancy Tax: Goal: Increase annually 3.0% Citizen Communication and involvement (Source: City Data) Registered voter turnout: Goal: 80%+ registered voters 86.7% Participation in Boards, Commissions, Leadership activities: Goal: Increasing √ Number of public outreach messages, advisories, press releases or posts (in print or electronically) shared with the community daily on various platforms or delivery methods containing City education/ information: Goal: 1,600; "Progressing" 1,200- 1,600; "Needs Improvement" <1,200 1,460 Communication (Source: City Data) Increase in followers on City social media accounts: Goal: Facebook: 10%; Instagram: 20%; Twitter: 5% Instagram: 24%Facebook: 5% Twitter: 3% Number of Citywide social media posts: Goal: 2,300+ “Progressing” is 2,200-2,999; “Needs Improvement” is <2,000 2,200 Number of digital media communications, including Around and About Temecula, Park Adventure Scenes, Alumni Project, etc. Goal: 25; “Progressing” is 20-25; “needs Improvement” is <20 23 Number of updates to Temecula Outreach Channel 3 and YouTube: Goal: 100; "Progressing" is 75-99; "Needs Improvement" is <75 147 (2019-2020) Accountable & ResponsiveCity Government City depaRtments RepoRt on moRe than 160 peRfoRmanCe measuRes tied to the QLMP Core Values in the annual City Operating Budget. The QLMP is integral to how the City organizes its work and views its mission. The indicators dashboard on the following page highlights some key performance measures related to fiscal policy, funding for desired service levels and citizen communications and involvement, which is also a key element of the Equity Core Value in the next section. the City opeRates undeR a theme of “BuildinG GReatness, maintaininG exCellenCe.” As the City builds out, the focus is increasingly on maintenance of facilities and service levels that meet the expectations of current residents. As shown in the 20 year project goals at the beginning of the QLMP, investments in technology and operating systems are critical to maintaining exceptional service standards while achieving high levels of governmental efficiency. 47 48 DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 ACCOUNTABLE & RESPONSIVE CITY GOVERNMENT6 37 384950 ■Provide consistently professional services and information to customers and constituents ■Promote innovation and adopt technology that enhances access to information and data ■Maintain a flexible organization which responds to the changing needs and priorities of the community ■Provide the highest quality of service at the most cost-effective rate while being fiscally responsible ■Ensure transparency in all aspects of City government Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments Our Goals for 2040 ■Created a formal Asset Management Plan and dedicated accounts to maintain high quality amenities ■Created irrevocable trusts for pension obligations ■Implemented QLESS calendaring software which allows citizens to make appointments with City staff online ■Achieved and maintained a CIS Top 20 rating for excellent cybersecurity protection of City systems ■Created technology centers and extensive WIFI capability for the public at libraries, Old Town, parks and other City facilities, as well as locations in coordination with local schools ■Numerous state-recognized awards for programs, planning, and special events ■Developed a free City app to facilitate communication and input from residents ■Significant social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to inform the community of City business ■Significant long-term investments in digital capabilities, including permitting, remove work, and other related infrastructure that allows the City to be more flexible to workforce/ business needs ■Received yearly professional association awards for Annual Operating Budget, Capital Improvement Program Budget and Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports for past 30 years ■Prioritize funding and support for maintaining a safe community as top priority ■Sustain the asset management accounts to ensure the City has resources to replace capital assets as they reach the end of their useful lives ■Expand City use of paperless technology. Among other benefits, this will help facilitate electronic workflow management, greatly increasing efficiency ■Maintain an exceptional work environment for City employees to help attract and retain high quality staff ■Maintain staffing levels necessary to deliver desired service levels to residents ■Build out the City’s fiber optic network, not only to provide public broadband access but to help manage City facilities and equipment ■Install Smart City technology to increase efficiency of service delivery ■Continue to evolve social media outreach as technology changes 6CoRe ValueAccountable & ResponsiveCity Government THE CITY’S OVERARCHING GOAL IS TO BUILD A FISCALLY SOUND ORGANIZATION wHICH RESPONDS TO THE EXPECTATIONS OF ITS CONSTITUENTS, MAINTAINS SERVICE STANDARDS, DELIVERS SERVICES IN AN EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE MANNER, LISTENS AND COMMUNICATES AND IS CONSTANTLY STRIVING TO BE BETTER AND MORE PRODUCTIVE CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 tailored tools and resources that are provided to residents and businesses, thus ensuring that equitable opportunities (from housing and recreation to education and employment) are achievable for ALL members of the community. Social opportunity includes the ability to acknowledge and heal the struggles of an eQuitaBle Community is one that listens with empathy, and undeRstands with Compassion, that different barriers impact the lives of its residents in a variety of ways. To minimize these impacts and remove barriers, Temecula continues to build on our diverse and inclusive legacy with specifically 51 COMMUNITY SURVEY topiC exCeeDs expeCtations or is a high prioritY progressing or is a MeDiuM prioritY (70-84%) not satisfieD or is a Lower prioritY (<70%) City services Residents importance of providing programs and services to those with special needs 73.2% Residents satisfaction with programs and services to those with special needs 86.0% Community involvement Provide for diversity, inclusion in events, services, programs, policies 59.3% Residents satisfaction with City efforts to provide for diversity, inclusion in events, services, programs, policies 70.6% Rating of Residents spending priorities (medium and high priorities) Expand programs and services to those with special needs 70.7% 52 EQUITY77CoRe Value Equity “THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTS THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF ALL HUMAN BEINGS IN A JUST SOCIETY. THE CITY RECOGNIZES THE ROLE IT PLAYS IN FOSTERING A HEALTHY AND PROSPEROUS ENVIRONMENT FOR ALL RESIDENTS AND COMMITS TO THE MEANINGFUL ADVANCEMENT OF EQUITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION IN ITS COMMUNITY DIALOGUE, SERVICES, PROGRAMS AND POLICIES ” CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION #20-56 CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 inequity gaps are closed through appropriate resource allocation, enhanced programs, and service delivery. Policies are regularly reviewed and updated to ensure community satisfaction and a high quality of life remain at the forefront. An equitable environment fosters a sense of belonging through various cultural experiences and diversity of thought, where all individuals feel welcome, engaged, and part of the community. Equity is measured through and by the people. Inclusion is the measurable goal. An equitable community reflects a high level of community engagement and participation. The key to accountability and the equitable delivery of programs and services lies in the specific and direct qualitative and quantitative data. An equitable community consistently collects and shares data with the community it serves in a manner that is accessible and understandable.individuals and families that have been historically or presently underrepresented in the community. Regardless of ethnicity, gender, ability or socio-economic status, Temecula continues to have heart. suppoRt is pRoVided thRouGh aCC- essiBle eduCational pathways and need-Based assessments created with the full and inclusive participation of the diverse community. Once identified, EQUITY7 Equity MEASURING OUR PROGRESS inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent fair and equitable treatment (Source: CA EPA; HUD; City Data) CalEnvironScreen Composite Score: Goal: 25 or lower; "Progressing" is 26-35; "Needs Improvement" is >35 30.05 Number of HUD identified racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) in the City: Goal: 0 0 Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index: Goal: 39 or less; "Progressing" is 40-54; "Needs Improvement" >54. 19-26 (2010) Number of Certificates/ Proclamations/ Presentations recognizing community contributions 168 healthy and prosperous environment (Source: City Data; Annual Housing Reports) Number of Students in Youth in Government: Goal: 21; “Progressing” is 15-20; “Need Improvement” is <15 21 Collaborate with Riverside County Law Library to offer law related classes to the public: Goal: 6; “Progressing” is 4-6; “Needs Improvement” is <4 4 MEASURING OUR PROGRESS** inDiCator Meets/exCeeDs goaLs progressing neeDs iMproveMent healthy and prosperous environment (Continued) Number of nonprofit organizations funded through the Community Service funding and the City Council Grant Program: Goal: 25+; "Progressing": 15-24; "Needs Improvement" <15 25 Number of affordable (Extremely Low - Low Income) housing units constructed : Goal: 64 per year; "Progressing" is 32-63; "Needs Improvement" is <32 192* Resource allocation (Source: City Data; Point in Time Homeless Survey) No. of community-wide special needs specific programs presented through TCSD (12+; 8-11; <7) 5 Number of special needs participants provided with swim lessons and water safety programs: Goal: 90; “Progressing” is 50-90; “Needs Improvement” is <50 66 Human Service programs for at-risk youth: Goal: 32; "Progressing" is 25-32; "Needs Improvement" is <28 29 Computer classes provided in the technology homework center at the Temecula Public Library: Goal: 12; "Progressing" is 9-12; "Needs Improvement" is <8 12 (2021-2022) Continue to fund and track homeless outreach services and participate in the annual Point-in-Time Survey. Goal: Reduce homeless numbers (PIT count); "Progressing" is Stable; "Needs Improvement" is increasing 59 in 2019; Targets in 2020: 40; 2021: 35 53 54 * The City has 192 units approved through Las Haciendas, Vine Creek and Rancho Las Bolsas. These projects are in various stages of financing and construction. ** The City is creating a web-based dashboard to measure and track progress of the indicators over time. New indicators will be incorporated into the web-based dashboard as better data sources become available. DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 Equity EQUITY7 37 385556 ■Support the fair and equitable treatment of all human beings in a just society ■Foster a healthy environment and prosperous opportunities for all residents of Temecula and advance equity, diversity, engagement and inclusion in the City’s services, programs, cultural experiences and community dialogue, including access to language ■Exhaust all methods of communication and outreach between the City and its residents when providing services and programs to ensure transparency and inclusion among all segments of society ■Monitor the City’s budget and resource allocation to close inequity gaps to ensure that the City’s programs, services, educational pathways and infrastructure meet the needs of diverse communities Our Strategic ObjectivesOur Accomplishments Our Goals for 2040 ■Extensive community outreach from City Departments through multiple media channels ■Formation of the Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Commission ■Youth in Government and other Youth Intern/Extern, and vocational programs ■Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) with focus on intervention and street-level outreach ■Annual Pu’éska Mountain Day celebrating Pechanga ■Cultural Heritage Month and Culture Fest ■Established Wi-Fi Gardens for all ■Senior Center and shuttle services ■Created a Human Services Division ■Eagle Soar Park and Splash Pad with inclusion and special needs playground ■Reduction of chronically homeless based on county-wide point-in-time surveys ■Invested $1 million through COVID funds for behavioral health support ■Implement all three phases of the Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Initiative: 1) REDI Commission 2) Diversity training 3) Equity Core Value in QLMP ■Develop a web-based dashboard to help communicate with Temecula residents and track progress over time ■Consider incorporating transportation insecurity questions into City survey efforts ■Continued advocacy for under-represented groups ■Work with private sector to develop attainable housing IN ALL THAT IT DOES, TEMECULA CONTINUOUSLY STRIVES TO BE AN EQUITABLE COMMUNITY FOR ALL 7CoRe Value CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT 10/6DRAFT 10/6 Lighting2040the Path to Where We Have Been Temecula grew from a small bedroom community to a regional center in its first 20 years, all the while maintaining a highly valued quality of life for its nearly 110,000 residents. Over the twelve years since the first QLMP was adopted, a number of systems have been put in place to protect and enhance the investments that were made during the City’s early years. The QLMP has been integrated thoroughly into the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgeting and its Annual Operating Budget (AOB). Increasingly, the focus is to ensure that the City is able to maintain the highest quality of services for its residents and that it is building its resiliency against all types of potential future disruptions, including economic, health, and natural disasters. Setting the Stage 9 DRAFT 10/5 Citizen’s 20 Year PriorityTIMELINEDRAFT 10/5 FOLD-OUT TIMELINE SIDE 1 CITY OF TEMECULACitizen’s 20 Year PriorityTIMELINE GreatnessExcellenceMaintaining Building *City Development ** Private Development *** Public-Private Development or Multi-Public Agency Development NOTE: Timeline will change due to budget considerations and community priorities. Project placement on the timeline indicates approximate initiation/completion within a 5 to 10 year period, not the exact year it will take place.8 DRAFT 10/5DRAFT 10/5 Implement Comprehensive Community Policing Strategy (Metro, Core, etc.) * Expand Asset Management System * French Valley Parkway Interchange, Phase 2 *** Support Career Technical Education (CTE) Matching TVUSD Students to MSJC Programs and Local Business Needs *** Ynez Road Widening north of Santiago Road * Broadband Master Plan * Stormwater Master Plan * Temecula Valley Hospital Expansion **Auxiliary Lanes Both Directions On I-15 * Nicolas Road Extension * Renovate/Upgrade Community Recreation Center (CRC), including expanded Teen Room and new Police Substation * Integrated Watershed Management Plan * I-15 Gateway Monument * Murrieta Creek Bridge at Cherry, Connecting to French Valley Parkway *** Freeway Landscape Beautification *** Renovate Skate Park at Ronald Reagan Sports Park * New Pickleball Courts * Old Town Creek Walk Landscape Enhancements *Build new Margarita Recreation Center with Intergenerational Recreation Programming * Renovate In-line Hockey Rink at Ronald Reagan Sports Park Develop a Digital Dashboard to Track Data and Measure Accomplishment of City Goals * General Plan Update * Complete Fiber Optic Connections to City Facilities * Partner to Promote and Build Attainable Housing *** Wineries/Hotel/Old Town Transit Line and Park & Ride ** Mobile Library Resource Vans *** Emergency Management Master Plan * Expand City WIFI to All Public Spaces * Organic Community Garden *** Complete Temecula Loop Trail * New Tennis Complex ***South Side Senior Center for Active Adults * Performing Arts Center *** Aquatics Facility with Olympic-size Swimming Pool *** Complete Implementation of Old Town Specific Plan * Continued Implementation of Uptown Temecula Specific Plan * French Valley Parkway Interchange Phase 3 *** Overland Bridge Widening and extension over Murrieta Creek * Implement Smart City Technology to Increase Efficiency and City Service Delivery * Establish a Transportation Task Force to address Regional Circulation Needs *** Diaz Road Widening * Climate Action Plan with Greenways Infrastructure Element Including Master Drainage Study, Trails and Bikeways, and Urban Forest Management Plan *Old Town Parking Structure(s) * Build Fire Training Facility with Tower ***Western Bypass Corridor *** Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout * Complete Renovations to Fire Stations 73 and 84 * ! Wildlife Crossing Over I-15 *** Coordinate Acquisition of Fire Station 12 in Old Town * General Plan Update * Temecula 2022 - 2025 2025 - 2030 2030-2040 2040 FOLD-OUT TIMELINE SIDE 2 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0494, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Woodside Homes General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Open Space, Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Long Valley Wash / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) East: Single Family Residential / County of Riverside West: Vacant Land, Single Family Residential / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353 which allowed for the subdivision of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch. The approval on the proposed property for this tentative tract map expired. 2 On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan including updating the development standards and facilities within the sports park, providing a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allowing for age-qualified housing, adding design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revising the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improving trails and trail connections, updating the landscape architecture master plan, and revising the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for the community while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On June 6, 2018, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 which includes Planning Area 19. On June 2, 2021 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA20- 1414, Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots. Since that approval, the applicant has changed the building technique used for the planning area which resulted in a new set of elevations and changes to the architectural styles. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes submitted Planning Application PA22-0494, Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project involves the construction of single-family homes ranging in size from 3,874 square feet to 4,974 square feet on 16 lots of Planning Area 19 within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed architecture, plotting, landscaping, and walls and fences were reviewed for conformance with the development standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan. Architecture The project proposes four (4) floor plans and three (3) architectural styles. The architectural styles include Southwest, Prairie, and American Farmhouse, which are consistent with the Residential Architectural Standards specified in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines. Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance and provide variety along the streetscape and within the internal residential area. 3 The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the three proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials and with articulation provided on elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that work to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: American Farmhouse: vertical board and batten, horizontal siding accents, front to back main gable roof, concrete flat roof tile, vertical multi-panned windows Southwest: flat roofs of varying heights, divided pane windows, deep set windows, stucco walls Prairie: smooth flat concrete tile hip roof, horizontal design elements, vertical shaped windows Product Placement Plan The proposed product placement conforms to the requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Valley Neighborhood Design Guidelines. A varied and visually interesting street scene has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan, building setbacks, and elevation type to meet the intent of the design guidelines. This Specific Plan requires “Architecture Forward” concepts in all of the homes in this planning area. Architecture forward is defined as advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is recessed a minimum of eight (8) feet behind the living space for this planning area. This ensures that the architecture of the garage doors will not dominate the street scene. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on October 6, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002, as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single-family homes on 16 lots of Planning Area 19. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as 4 there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. Draft PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing HILLSTON E S T SOMMERSBENDProject Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-1414 \ Date Created: 4/13/2021 1:4,0001 inch = 333 feet 964-640-004 The map PA20-1414.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 820 16th Street, Suite 500 KTGY Group, Inc. Denver, Colorado 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 COPYRIGHT C8/1/2022 5:33:27 PMSHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND 08/01/2022 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name DEVELOPER WOODSIDE HOMES & SHRH 951.233.4898 Contact: Greg Hastings Greg.Hastings@woodsidehomes.com ARCHITECT KTGY GROUP, INC. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 303.389.6016 Contact: Nishka Maheshwary nmaheshwary@ktgy.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92507 951.782.0707 Contact: Emily Sipes esipes@rickengineering.com PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEXPROJECT SITE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER L.R. NELSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 6765 West Russel Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89118 702.798.7978 Contact: Sarah Bareng sarah.bareng@lrneng.com COLOR CONSULTANT AT DESIGN CONSULTING, INC. 2211 Michelson Dr. Suite 450 Irvine, CA 92612 949.724.1619 Contact: Annie Tutunjian annie@atconsulting.us PA19, PA20, PA21 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A0.1STYLE SHEET 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH 1C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 1A -SOUTHWEST 2C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 2A -SOUTHWEST 3C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 3B -PRAIRIE 4C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 4A -SOUTHWEST 5C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 5B -PRAIRIE 6C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 6B -PRAIRIE 7C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 7C -PRAIRIE 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.0PLAN 1 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 1 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" x 33'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 17'-4" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-6"BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BATH 3 BATH 2 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" DROP ZONE 10'-0"clg.5'-7" x 6'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 6'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 17'-6" PREP KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7"PANTRY POWDER barn door option barn door option BENCH linen HIS WIC HER WIC GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.19'-6" x 17'-8" CASUAL DINING 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 18'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.11'-7"x 9'-11" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.19'-9" x 12'-9" Courtyard5486.4018' - 0"26822.40 88' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"2438.408' - 0"1 A1.10 __________ 1 A1.10 __________ 2 A1.10 __________2 A1.10 __________2 A1-30 __________2 A1-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.1PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.2PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT RIGHT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 4 789121311 1 2 89 11 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.3PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH REAR LEFT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28 11 1 2 58 912611 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.4PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A1.11 __________2 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 11'-0"clg.11'-8" X 17'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 11'-0clg.17'-8" X 17'-4" 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" X 33'-7" GREAT ROOM 11'-0"clg.19'-6" X 17'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" X 6'-7"MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-7" X 6'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BATH 2 BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 15'-7" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7" Pantry Powder BATH 3 KITCHEN 11'-0"clg.19'-9" X 12'-9" CASUAL DINING 11'-0"clg.12'-1" X 18'-7" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-8"FOYER 11'-0"clg.11'-7" X 9'-11" COURTYARD 2 A1-61 __________2 A1-61 __________ 26822.40 88' - 0" 11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"18' - 0"34' - 0"8' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.5PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.6PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58 7411 2 638411 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.7PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58411 2 963811 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.8PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 1/4" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"1/4" / 12"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.9PLAN 1 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE LAUNDRY PREP KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE PREP KITCHEN PANTRY POWDER CASUAL DINING BEDROOM 2BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.10PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT.3073.4010' - 1"2438.408' - 0"GREAT ROOMKITCHENPrep KitchenLAUNDRYHOME OFFICE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen Pantry Powder BONUS ROOM BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.11PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.0PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 2 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH 2 A2.10 __________2 A2.10 __________ Courtyard HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6"BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 4 GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 2 W.I.C. 12080 sgd opt Storage Coats21945.6072' - 0"21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 10363.20 34' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.1PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.2PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 6 1 2 34 79121145 FRONT RIGHT 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.3PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 7811 12 8 91165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.4PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 1 A2.11 __________ 1 A2.11 __________ 2 A2.11 __________2 A2.11 __________ Storage Laundry 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" Great Room 11'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" Primary Bedroom 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" Bedroom 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" Bonus 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" Bedroom 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" W.I.C. Bath 3 2-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" Courtyard 1-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 4 W.I.C. Coats W.I.C. MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6" 21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"21945.6072' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.5PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.6PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 638411 2 96358 711 RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.7PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 635 8 411 2 96358 7411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.8PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.9PLAN 2 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HIS WICHER WIC KITCHEN CASUAL DINING BONUS ROOM W.I.C. BATH 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.10PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN Great Room T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC HIS WICStorage KITCHEN CASUAL DINING Bonus W.I.C.Bath 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.11PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.0PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 3 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 1 A3.10 __________ 1 A3.10 __________ 2 A3.10 __________2 A3.10 __________PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"PORCH Covered Patio 10'-0"clg.42'-0" x 12'-0" 27432.00 90' - 0" 21945.60 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC W.I.C. BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 2 BATH 2 BATH 3W.I.C. Coats BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9"GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10"KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" GREAT ROOMKITCHEN HER WIC HIS WIC NICHE STORAGE 1-CAR GARAGE LAUNDRY PANTRY PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOMPWDR. W.I.C. BATH 5 HOME PLUS SUITE 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 17'-9" SLEEP 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.1PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.2PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS FRONT RIGHT 1 289 11 1 234 7912131151413 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.3PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 128 11 1 2 38911 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.4PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A3.11 __________ 2 A3.11 __________ 1 A3.11 __________1 A3.11 __________ W.I.C. BATH 5 BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" ? BATH 3 W.I.C. Coats BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8"NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" W.I.C. BATH 4 21945.26 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 27431.66 90' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.5PLAN 3 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.6PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 47 9 10115 6 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.7PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 4 7865 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.8PLAN 3 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WHWH 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:121219.204' - 0"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"5" / 12"5" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.9PLAN 3 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PRIMARY BATH LAUNDRY PREP-KITCHEN 2-CAR GARAGE FOYER PWDR.BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.10PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BONUS ROOMPWDR.FOYER2-CAR GARAGEPREP-KITCHENPANTRYPrimary Bath T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.11PLAN 3 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.0PLAN 4 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 4 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH BATH 2 W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 Linen BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"W.I.C. HER WIC HIS WIC HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 7'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 28651.20 94' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"2 A4.10 __________2 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 2 A4-30 __________2 A4-30 __________ - --- __________- --- __________ BATH 4 1-CAR GARAGE EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.CoatsFOYER WIC Guest Casita 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.HER WIC HIS WIC STORAGE1-CAR GARAGE Sleep 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 11'-8" BATH 4 Multi-Gen Suite 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 17'-8" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.1PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. MULTI-GENERATION SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.2PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 1 2 34 79121311514 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.3PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1278 11 12 7 91261158 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.4PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C.BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 17'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 5'-8"Coats W.I.C. 2 A4.11 __________2 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 2 A4-61 __________2 A4-61 __________4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"5486.40 18' - 0" 12798.42 41' - 11 7/8" 4879.98 16' - 0 1/8" 5486.40 18' - 0" 28651.20 94' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.5PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.6PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 3 8 11 26 35 8 7119 FRONT RIGHT 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.7PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 6 3 8411 2 963 58411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.8PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 1/4" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.9PLAN 4 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BEDROOM 4 KITCHEN PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY MUDROOM FOYER FORMAL DINING PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.10PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER FORMAL DININGMUDROOMPANTRY PREP-KITCHENKITCHENBEDROOM 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.11PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA AUGUST 2, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.0PLAN 5 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 5 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE HIS WIC HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-3" x 11'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0"READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3"PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" STORAGE BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 3 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 2 WICBEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" STORAGE ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11"GLASS WALL/SGD OPTBOOKSHELF OPTWINE RACK OPT 1 A5.10 __________ 1 A5.10 __________ 2 A5.10 __________2 A5.10 __________ 14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"FORMAL DINING BEDROOM 4 BATH 5 BATH 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.1PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. DELUXE PREP KITCHEN OPT. MEDIA ROOM OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.2PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 478912131114 1 28911 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.3PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 1 28 11 1 2 961158 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.4PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 2 A5.11 __________2 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ WIC BATH 6 FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7"W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11" LAUNDRY STORAGE W.I.C. BATH 5 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 BATH 4 BATH 2 WIC BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"HIS WIC HER WIC 20116.8066' - 0"14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.5PLAN 5 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.6PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 11911 3 4 7561110 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.7PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 8 34 98 1165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.8PLAN 5 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12" 11" / 12"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 1219.204' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.9PLAN 5 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 3BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.10PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.11PLAN 5 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.0PLAN 6 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 6 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH HIS WIC HER WIC2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 9'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8"COATSGREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6"KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6"CASUAL DINING PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"17' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7"BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC BATH 3 PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC POWDER LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" BONUS ROOM 9'-0"clg.17'-7" X 19'-3" OTB wet bar opt 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"609.602' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"17373.6057' - 0"PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM HIS WIC HER WIC LAUNDRY POWDER PRIMARY BATH 2 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 HIS WIC HER WIC OTB 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.1PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT STACKED W/D WITH SINK OPT SUPER SHOWER OPT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.2PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28911 34 79121311515 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.3PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 811 1 2 98 12115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.4PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" X 9'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" GREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COATS PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 13'-6" CASUAL DINING 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"5486.4018' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"HIS WIC HER WIC POWDER BATH 3 WIC OTB OTB WIC BATH 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"5791.2019' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.5PLAN 6 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.6PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 7562 8 234 79610115 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.7PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 8567 234 9610115 8 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.8PLAN 6 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 11.0:12 11.0:12 1.5:1211.0:1211.0:121/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" DECK BELOW 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:121/4" / 12"1219.204' - 0"3.0:123.0:12 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.9PLAN 6 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC HER WICHIS WIC PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.10PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HIS WIC PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.11PLAN 6 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.0PLAN 7 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 7 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COURTYARD POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6"GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6"COATSDOG WASH OPT 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________4267.2014' - 0"9144.0030' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"6705.60 22' - 0" 6705.60 22' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 7924.80 26' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"20116.80 66' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 6645.28 21' - 9 5/8" 13471.53 44' - 2 3/8" 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" ENTERTAINMENT LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C. BATH 4 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" KITCHEN CASUAL DINING GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HIS WIC 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.1PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.2PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89116 12 3 4 7912131158 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.3PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2811 1 2 6 9128115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.4PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7"FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" COURTYARD PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6" HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" W.I.C. BATH 5 GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ Bedroom 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" HER WIC HIS WIC DECK W.I.C. BATH 3 ENTERTAINMENT 9'-0"clg.14'-1" X 10'-0" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.5PLAN 7 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.6PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756289 3 4 75628910 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.7PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4756 8 347 6 8 95 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.8PLAN 7 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 5.0:125.0:1211.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 5.0:125.0:121/4" / 12"COURTYARD DECK BELOW 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 DECK BELOW COURTYARD 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.9PLAN 7 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM PRIMARY BATH T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER T.O. BEAM DECK ENTERTAINMENT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.10PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. PRIMARY BATH 2-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER DECK ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.11PLAN 7 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0494, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 19 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR FOUR (4) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 16 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes filed Planning Application No. PA22-0494 a Home Product Review (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0494, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Home Product Review Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Environmental Impact Report or addenda prepared for the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Home Product Review: The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 16 lots of Planning Area 19. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0494, Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Wats, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22-0494 Sommers Bend PA19 Shawood HPR: Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots. Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-640-004 Exempt Per Development Agreement (DA) No. 2016-0156276 MSHCP Category: Residential Detached Per DA No. 2016-0156276 DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 October 19, 2022 October 19, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 11 Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 11 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligentl y pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 11. 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016 and Operating Memorandums. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Page 3 of 11 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent architectural style, materials, equipment, finishes or similar matters as specified in the Home Product Review plans, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an architectural style, materials, equipment, or finishes that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 14. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 15. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 16. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 17. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in lieu fees based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 18. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 19. Page 4 of 11 Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 20. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 21. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor as defined in the Eastern Municipal Water District water use guidelines. 22. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes above three (3) feet and common areas. 23. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron, tubular steel, or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 24. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 25. Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted. 26. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Page 5 of 11 Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been mai ntained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 27. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 28. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 29. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping for slopes greater than three (3) feet within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 30. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed. 31. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be installed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 32. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 33. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 34. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 35. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 36. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 37. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 38. Page 6 of 11 Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, (iv) Tentative Tract Map No. 37368, and/or (v) Tentative Tract Map No. 37341, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a.First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b.Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c.Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 d.Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37368 e.Fifth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 39. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 40. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 41. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 42. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 43. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 44. Page 7 of 11 Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 45. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 46. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 47. Driveways. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18’ in depth from back of sidewalk. 48. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 49. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 50. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 51. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 52. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 53. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 54. Page 8 of 11 Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 55. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 56. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 57. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 58. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 59. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 60. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 61. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 62. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 63. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 64. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 65. Page 9 of 11 Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 66. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 67. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 68. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial and multi -family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for all and for single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 69. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 70. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 71. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for residential track home roads with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 72. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Page 10 of 11 Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 73. Two Point Access. This development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two points of access, via all -weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 74. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 75. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Hydrant Markers. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots per Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 76. Knox Box. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5) 77. Page 11 of 11 VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com October 20, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA22-0494, Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506 -5137 or at email scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 1997121030 Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA19 (PA22-0494) Project Location: Tract 37341-10 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 19, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR . 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the EIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the EIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the EIR. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report and Addenda that were prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Woodside Homes Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA19 (PA22-0494) Location: Tract 37341-10 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Home Product Review for Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 16 lots of Planning Area 19. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 APPLICANT: Woodside Homes PROPOSAL: Home Product Review Applications for Sommers Bend Planning Area 19 (PA22-0494) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots; Planning Area 20B (PA22-0495) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots; and Planning Area 21 (PA22-0496) to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. The projects are located within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Section exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: October 19, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0495, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Woodside Homes General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Single Family Residential, Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Single Family Residential / County of Riverside East: Single Family Residential / County of Riverside West: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353 which allowed for the subdivision of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch. The approval on the proposed property for this tentative tract map expired. 2 On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan including updating the development standards and facilities within the sports park, providing a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allowing for age-qualified housing, adding design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revising the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improving trails and trail connections, updating the landscape architecture master plan, and revising the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for the community while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On June 6, 2018, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 which includes Planning Area 20B. On June 2, 2021 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA20- 1415, Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots. Since that approval, the applicant has changed the building technique used for the planning area which resulted in a new set of elevations and changes to the architectural styles. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes submitted Planning Application PA22-0495, Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project involves the construction of single family homes ranging in size from 3,203 square feet to 4,497 square feet on 23 lots of Planning Area 20B within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed architecture, plotting, landscaping, and walls and fences were reviewed for conformance with the development standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan. Architecture The project proposes four (4) floor plans and three (3) architectural styles. The architectural styles include Southwest, Prairie, and American Farmhouse, which are consistent with the Residential Architectural Standards specified in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines. Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance and provide variety along the streetscape and within the internal residential area. 3 The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the three proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials and with articulation provided on elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that work to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: American Farmhouse: vertical board and batten, horizontal siding accents, front to back main gable roof, concrete flat roof tile, vertical multi-panned windows Southwest: flat roofs of varying heights, divided pane windows, deep set windows, stucco walls Prairie: smooth flat concrete tile hip roof, horizontal design elements, vertical shaped windows Product Placement Plan The proposed product placement conforms to the requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Valley Neighborhood Design Guidelines. A varied and visually interesting street scene has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan, building setbacks, and elevation type to meet the intent of the design guidelines. This Specific Plan requires “Architecture Forward” concepts in all of the homes in this planning area. Architecture forward is defined as advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is recessed a minimum of eight (8) feet behind the living space for this planning area. This ensures that the architecture of the garage doors will not dominate the street scene. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on October 6, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002, as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single-family homes on 23 lots of Planning Area 20B. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as 4 there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. Draft PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing HILLSTON E S T SOMMERSBENDProject Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-1415 \ Date Created: 4/13/2021 1:4,0001 inch = 333 feet 964-640-007 The map PA20-1415.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 820 16th Street, Suite 500 KTGY Group, Inc. Denver, Colorado 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 COPYRIGHT C8/1/2022 5:33:27 PMSHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND 08/01/2022 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name DEVELOPER WOODSIDE HOMES & SHRH 951.233.4898 Contact: Greg Hastings Greg.Hastings@woodsidehomes.com ARCHITECT KTGY GROUP, INC. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 303.389.6016 Contact: Nishka Maheshwary nmaheshwary@ktgy.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92507 951.782.0707 Contact: Emily Sipes esipes@rickengineering.com PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEXPROJECT SITE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER L.R. NELSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 6765 West Russel Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89118 702.798.7978 Contact: Sarah Bareng sarah.bareng@lrneng.com COLOR CONSULTANT AT DESIGN CONSULTING, INC. 2211 Michelson Dr. Suite 450 Irvine, CA 92612 949.724.1619 Contact: Annie Tutunjian annie@atconsulting.us PA19, PA20, PA21 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A0.1STYLE SHEET 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH 1C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 1A -SOUTHWEST 2C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 2A -SOUTHWEST 3C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 3B -PRAIRIE 4C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 4A -SOUTHWEST 5C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 5B -PRAIRIE 6C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 6B -PRAIRIE 7C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 7C -PRAIRIE 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.0PLAN 1 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 1 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" x 33'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 17'-4" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-6"BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BATH 3 BATH 2 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" DROP ZONE 10'-0"clg.5'-7" x 6'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 6'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 17'-6" PREP KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7"PANTRY POWDER barn door option barn door option BENCH linen HIS WIC HER WIC GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.19'-6" x 17'-8" CASUAL DINING 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 18'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.11'-7"x 9'-11" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.19'-9" x 12'-9" Courtyard5486.4018' - 0"26822.40 88' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"2438.408' - 0"1 A1.10 __________ 1 A1.10 __________ 2 A1.10 __________2 A1.10 __________2 A1-30 __________2 A1-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.1PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.2PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT RIGHT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 4 789121311 1 2 89 11 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.3PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH REAR LEFT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28 11 1 2 58 912611 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.4PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A1.11 __________2 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 11'-0"clg.11'-8" X 17'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 11'-0clg.17'-8" X 17'-4" 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" X 33'-7" GREAT ROOM 11'-0"clg.19'-6" X 17'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" X 6'-7"MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-7" X 6'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BATH 2 BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 15'-7" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7" Pantry Powder BATH 3 KITCHEN 11'-0"clg.19'-9" X 12'-9" CASUAL DINING 11'-0"clg.12'-1" X 18'-7" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-8"FOYER 11'-0"clg.11'-7" X 9'-11" COURTYARD 2 A1-61 __________2 A1-61 __________ 26822.40 88' - 0" 11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"18' - 0"34' - 0"8' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.5PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.6PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58 7411 2 638411 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.7PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58411 2 963811 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.8PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 1/4" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"1/4" / 12"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.9PLAN 1 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE LAUNDRY PREP KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE PREP KITCHEN PANTRY POWDER CASUAL DINING BEDROOM 2BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.10PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT.3073.4010' - 1"2438.408' - 0"GREAT ROOMKITCHENPrep KitchenLAUNDRYHOME OFFICE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen Pantry Powder BONUS ROOM BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.11PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.0PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 2 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH 2 A2.10 __________2 A2.10 __________ Courtyard HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6"BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 4 GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 2 W.I.C. 12080 sgd opt Storage Coats21945.6072' - 0"21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 10363.20 34' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.1PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.2PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 6 1 2 34 79121145 FRONT RIGHT 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.3PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 7811 12 8 91165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.4PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 1 A2.11 __________ 1 A2.11 __________ 2 A2.11 __________2 A2.11 __________ Storage Laundry 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" Great Room 11'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" Primary Bedroom 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" Bedroom 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" Bonus 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" Bedroom 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" W.I.C. Bath 3 2-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" Courtyard 1-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 4 W.I.C. Coats W.I.C. MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6" 21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"21945.6072' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.5PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.6PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 638411 2 96358 711 RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.7PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 635 8 411 2 96358 7411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.8PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.9PLAN 2 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HIS WICHER WIC KITCHEN CASUAL DINING BONUS ROOM W.I.C. BATH 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.10PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN Great Room T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC HIS WICStorage KITCHEN CASUAL DINING Bonus W.I.C.Bath 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.11PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.0PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 3 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 1 A3.10 __________ 1 A3.10 __________ 2 A3.10 __________2 A3.10 __________PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"PORCH Covered Patio 10'-0"clg.42'-0" x 12'-0" 27432.00 90' - 0" 21945.60 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC W.I.C. BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 2 BATH 2 BATH 3W.I.C. Coats BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9"GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10"KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" GREAT ROOMKITCHEN HER WIC HIS WIC NICHE STORAGE 1-CAR GARAGE LAUNDRY PANTRY PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOMPWDR. W.I.C. BATH 5 HOME PLUS SUITE 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 17'-9" SLEEP 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.1PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.2PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS FRONT RIGHT 1 289 11 1 234 7912131151413 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.3PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 128 11 1 2 38911 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.4PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A3.11 __________ 2 A3.11 __________ 1 A3.11 __________1 A3.11 __________ W.I.C. BATH 5 BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" ? BATH 3 W.I.C. Coats BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8"NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" W.I.C. BATH 4 21945.26 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 27431.66 90' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.5PLAN 3 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.6PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 47 9 10115 6 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.7PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 4 7865 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.8PLAN 3 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WHWH 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:121219.204' - 0"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"5" / 12"5" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.9PLAN 3 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PRIMARY BATH LAUNDRY PREP-KITCHEN 2-CAR GARAGE FOYER PWDR.BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.10PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BONUS ROOMPWDR.FOYER2-CAR GARAGEPREP-KITCHENPANTRYPrimary Bath T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.11PLAN 3 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.0PLAN 4 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 4 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH BATH 2 W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 Linen BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"W.I.C. HER WIC HIS WIC HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 7'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 28651.20 94' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"2 A4.10 __________2 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 2 A4-30 __________2 A4-30 __________ - --- __________- --- __________ BATH 4 1-CAR GARAGE EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.CoatsFOYER WIC Guest Casita 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.HER WIC HIS WIC STORAGE1-CAR GARAGE Sleep 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 11'-8" BATH 4 Multi-Gen Suite 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 17'-8" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.1PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. MULTI-GENERATION SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.2PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 1 2 34 79121311514 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.3PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1278 11 12 7 91261158 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.4PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C.BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 17'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 5'-8"Coats W.I.C. 2 A4.11 __________2 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 2 A4-61 __________2 A4-61 __________4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"5486.40 18' - 0" 12798.42 41' - 11 7/8" 4879.98 16' - 0 1/8" 5486.40 18' - 0" 28651.20 94' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.5PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.6PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 3 8 11 26 35 8 7119 FRONT RIGHT 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.7PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 6 3 8411 2 963 58411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.8PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 1/4" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.9PLAN 4 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BEDROOM 4 KITCHEN PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY MUDROOM FOYER FORMAL DINING PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.10PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER FORMAL DININGMUDROOMPANTRY PREP-KITCHENKITCHENBEDROOM 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.11PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA AUGUST 2, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.0PLAN 5 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 5 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE HIS WIC HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-3" x 11'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0"READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3"PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" STORAGE BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 3 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 2 WICBEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" STORAGE ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11"GLASS WALL/SGD OPTBOOKSHELF OPTWINE RACK OPT 1 A5.10 __________ 1 A5.10 __________ 2 A5.10 __________2 A5.10 __________ 14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"FORMAL DINING BEDROOM 4 BATH 5 BATH 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.1PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. DELUXE PREP KITCHEN OPT. MEDIA ROOM OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.2PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 478912131114 1 28911 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.3PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 1 28 11 1 2 961158 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.4PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 2 A5.11 __________2 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ WIC BATH 6 FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7"W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11" LAUNDRY STORAGE W.I.C. BATH 5 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 BATH 4 BATH 2 WIC BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"HIS WIC HER WIC 20116.8066' - 0"14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.5PLAN 5 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.6PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 11911 3 4 7561110 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.7PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 8 34 98 1165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.8PLAN 5 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12" 11" / 12"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 1219.204' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.9PLAN 5 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 3BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.10PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.11PLAN 5 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.0PLAN 6 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 6 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH HIS WIC HER WIC2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 9'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8"COATSGREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6"KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6"CASUAL DINING PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"17' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7"BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC BATH 3 PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC POWDER LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" BONUS ROOM 9'-0"clg.17'-7" X 19'-3" OTB wet bar opt 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"609.602' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"17373.6057' - 0"PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM HIS WIC HER WIC LAUNDRY POWDER PRIMARY BATH 2 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 HIS WIC HER WIC OTB 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.1PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT STACKED W/D WITH SINK OPT SUPER SHOWER OPT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.2PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28911 34 79121311515 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.3PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 811 1 2 98 12115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.4PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" X 9'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" GREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COATS PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 13'-6" CASUAL DINING 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"5486.4018' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"HIS WIC HER WIC POWDER BATH 3 WIC OTB OTB WIC BATH 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"5791.2019' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.5PLAN 6 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.6PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 7562 8 234 79610115 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.7PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 8567 234 9610115 8 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.8PLAN 6 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 11.0:12 11.0:12 1.5:1211.0:1211.0:121/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" DECK BELOW 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:121/4" / 12"1219.204' - 0"3.0:123.0:12 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.9PLAN 6 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC HER WICHIS WIC PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.10PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HIS WIC PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.11PLAN 6 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.0PLAN 7 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 7 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COURTYARD POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6"GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6"COATSDOG WASH OPT 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________4267.2014' - 0"9144.0030' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"6705.60 22' - 0" 6705.60 22' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 7924.80 26' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"20116.80 66' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 6645.28 21' - 9 5/8" 13471.53 44' - 2 3/8" 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" ENTERTAINMENT LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C. BATH 4 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" KITCHEN CASUAL DINING GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HIS WIC 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.1PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.2PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89116 12 3 4 7912131158 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.3PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2811 1 2 6 9128115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.4PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7"FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" COURTYARD PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6" HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" W.I.C. BATH 5 GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ Bedroom 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" HER WIC HIS WIC DECK W.I.C. BATH 3 ENTERTAINMENT 9'-0"clg.14'-1" X 10'-0" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.5PLAN 7 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.6PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756289 3 4 75628910 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.7PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4756 8 347 6 8 95 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.8PLAN 7 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 5.0:125.0:1211.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 5.0:125.0:121/4" / 12"COURTYARD DECK BELOW 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 DECK BELOW COURTYARD 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.9PLAN 7 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM PRIMARY BATH T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER T.O. BEAM DECK ENTERTAINMENT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.10PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. PRIMARY BATH 2-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER DECK ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.11PLAN 7 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0495, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 20B OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR FOUR (4) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 23 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes filed Planning Application No. PA22-0495 a Home Product Review (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0495, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Home Product Review Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Environmental Impact Report or addenda prepared for the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Home Product Review: The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 23 lots of Planning Area 20B. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0495, Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Wats, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22-0495 Sommers Bend PA20B Shawood HPR: Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots. Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-740-001 964-740-002 964-740-003 964-740-004 964-740-005 964-740-006 964-740-007 964-740-008 964-740-009 964-740-010 964-740-011 964-740-012 964-750-001 964-750-002 964-750-003 964-750-004 964-750-005 964-750-006 964-750-007 964-750-008 964-750-009 964-750-010 964-750-011 Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 MSHCP Category: Residential Detached Per DA No. 2016-0156276 DIF Category: Page 1 of 11 TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 October 19, 2022 October 19, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Page 2 of 11 Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condi tion shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11. 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016, and Operating Memorandums. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Page 3 of 11 Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent architectural style, materials, equipment, finishes or similar matters as specified in the Home Product Review plans, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an architectural style, materials, equipment, or finishes that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 14. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 15. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 16. Page 4 of 11 Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 17. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in lieu fees based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 18. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 19. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 20. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 21. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor as defined in the Eastern Municipal Water District water use guidelines. 22. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes above three (3) feet and common areas. 23. Page 5 of 11 Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron, tubular steel, or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 24. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 25. Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted. 26. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 27. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 28. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy, or any use allowed by this approval. 29. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping for slopes greater than three (3) feet within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 30. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed. 31. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be installed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 32. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 33. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 34. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 35. Page 6 of 11 Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 36. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 37. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 38. Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, (iv) Tentative Tract Map No. 37368, and/or (v) Tentative Tract Map No. 37341, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 d. Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37368 e. Fifth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 39. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Landscape Easement Relocation. The Developer shall provide a recorded copy of the relocation of the landscape easement to Public Works. 40. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 41. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 42. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 43. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 44. Page 7 of 11 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 45. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 46. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24-hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 47. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 48. Driveways. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18’ in depth from back of sidewalk. 49. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 50. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 51. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 52. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Page 8 of 11 Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 53. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 54. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 55. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 56. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 57. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 58. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 59. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 60. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 61. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 62. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 63. Page 9 of 11 Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 64. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 65. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 66. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 67. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 68. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 69. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single-family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 70. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 71. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 72. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 73. Page 10 of 11 Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 74. Two Point Access. This development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two points of access, via all -weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 75. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of fire sprinkler plans and hydraulic calculations are required for each structure. The fire flow test can be no older than 6-months old per Chapter 80 amendments of the fire code. 76. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Hydrant Markers. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots per Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 77. Page 11 of 11 VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com October 20, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA22-0495, Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 1997121030 Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA20B (PA22-0495) Project Location: Tract 37341-12 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 19, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the EIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the EIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the EIR. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report and Addenda that were prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Woodside Homes Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA20B (PA22-0495) Location: Tract 37341-12 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Home Product Review for Planning Area 20B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already cont emplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 23 lots of Planning Area 20B. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 APPLICANT: Woodside Homes PROPOSAL: Home Product Review Applications for Sommers Bend Planning Area 19 (PA22-0494) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots; Planning Area 20B (PA22-0495) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots; and Planning Area 21 (PA22-0496) to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. The projects are located within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Section exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: October 19, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0496, a Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Woodside Homes General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Single Family Residential, Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Single Family Residential / County of Riverside East: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Fire Station 95 / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353 which allowed for the subdivision of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch. The approval on the proposed property for this tentative tract map expired. 2 On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan including an update to the development standards and facilities within the sports park, provide a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allow for age-qualified housing, add design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revise the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improve trails and trail connections, updates to the landscape architecture master plan, and revising the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for the community while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On June 6, 2018, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 which includes Planning Area 21. On June 2, 2021, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA20- 1416, Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. Since that approval, the applicant has changed the building technique used for the planning area which resulted in a new set of elevations and changes to the architectural styles. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes submitted Planning Application PA22-0496, Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project involves the construction of single-family homes ranging in size from 3,203 square feet to 4,974 square feet on 18 lots of Planning Area 21 within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed architecture, plotting, landscaping, and walls and fences were reviewed for conformance with the development standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan. Architecture The project proposes six (6) floor plans and three (3) architectural styles. The architectural styles include Southwest, Prairie, and American Farmhouse, which are consistent with the Residential Architectural Standards specified in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Design Guidelines. Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance and provide variety along the streetscape and within the internal residential area. 3 The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the three proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials and with articulation provided on elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that work to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: American Farmhouse: vertical board and batten, horizontal siding accents, front to back main gable roof, concrete flat roof tile, vertical multi-panned windows Southwest: flat roofs of varying heights, divided pane windows, deep set windows, stucco walls Prairie: smooth flat concrete tile hip roof, horizontal design elements, vertical shaped windows Product Placement Plan The proposed product placement conforms to the requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Valley Neighborhood Design Guidelines. A varied and visually interesting street scene has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan, building setbacks, and elevation type to meet the intent of the design guidelines. This Specific Plan requires “Architecture Forward” concepts in all of the homes in this planning area. Architecture forward is defined as advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is recessed a minimum of eight (8) feet behind the living space for this planning area. This ensures that the architecture of the garage doors will not dominate the street scene. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on October 6, 2022, and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002, as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single-family homes on 18 lots of Planning Area 21. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as 4 there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. Draft PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing BUTTERFIELD STAGE RDS O M M E RS BEND Project Site CITY OF TEMECULA \ Date Created: 9/29/2022 1:4,4001 inch = 367 feet The map PA22-0494.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 820 16th Street, Suite 500 KTGY Group, Inc. Denver, Colorado 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 COPYRIGHT C8/1/2022 5:33:27 PMSHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND 08/01/2022 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name Sheet Index - HPR Sheet Number Sheet Name DEVELOPER WOODSIDE HOMES & SHRH 951.233.4898 Contact: Greg Hastings Greg.Hastings@woodsidehomes.com ARCHITECT KTGY GROUP, INC. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 303.389.6016 Contact: Nishka Maheshwary nmaheshwary@ktgy.com CIVIL ENGINEER RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 1770 Iowa Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92507 951.782.0707 Contact: Emily Sipes esipes@rickengineering.com PROJECT DIRECTORY SHEET INDEXPROJECT SITE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER L.R. NELSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LLC 6765 West Russel Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, NV 89118 702.798.7978 Contact: Sarah Bareng sarah.bareng@lrneng.com COLOR CONSULTANT AT DESIGN CONSULTING, INC. 2211 Michelson Dr. Suite 450 Irvine, CA 92612 949.724.1619 Contact: Annie Tutunjian annie@atconsulting.us PA19, PA20, PA21 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A0.1STYLE SHEET 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH 1C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 1A -SOUTHWEST 2C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 2A -SOUTHWEST 3C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 3B -PRAIRIE 4C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 4A -SOUTHWEST 5C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 5B -PRAIRIE 6C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 6B -PRAIRIE 7C -AMERICAN FARMHOUSE 7C -PRAIRIE 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.0PLAN 1 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 1 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" x 33'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 17'-4" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-6"BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BATH 3 BATH 2 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" DROP ZONE 10'-0"clg.5'-7" x 6'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 6'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 17'-6" PREP KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7"PANTRY POWDER barn door option barn door option BENCH linen HIS WIC HER WIC GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.19'-6" x 17'-8" CASUAL DINING 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 18'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.11'-7"x 9'-11" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.19'-9" x 12'-9" Courtyard5486.4018' - 0"26822.40 88' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"2438.408' - 0"1 A1.10 __________ 1 A1.10 __________ 2 A1.10 __________2 A1.10 __________2 A1-30 __________2 A1-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.1PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.2PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT RIGHT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 4 789121311 1 2 89 11 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.3PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH REAR LEFT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28 11 1 2 58 912611 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.4PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A1.11 __________2 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ 1 A1.11 __________ HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 11'-0"clg.11'-8" X 17'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 11'-0clg.17'-8" X 17'-4" 3-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-7" X 33'-7" GREAT ROOM 11'-0"clg.19'-6" X 17'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-7" X 6'-7"MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-7" X 6'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BATH 2 BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 15'-7" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.8'-0" x 9'-7" Pantry Powder BATH 3 KITCHEN 11'-0"clg.19'-9" X 12'-9" CASUAL DINING 11'-0"clg.12'-1" X 18'-7" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 11'-8"FOYER 11'-0"clg.11'-7" X 9'-11" COURTYARD 2 A1-61 __________2 A1-61 __________ 26822.40 88' - 0" 11582.40 38' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 9144.00 30' - 0"14630.4048' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"18897.6062' - 0"18' - 0"34' - 0"8' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.5PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 AREA Name Area GARAGE 782 SF COVERED PATIO 360 SF COURTYARD 220 SF FIRST FLOOR 3203 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.6PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58 7411 2 638411 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.7PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 96 3 58411 2 963811 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.8PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 1/4" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"11" / 12"1/4" / 12"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.9PLAN 1 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE LAUNDRY PREP KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE PREP KITCHEN PANTRY POWDER CASUAL DINING BEDROOM 2BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.10PLAN 1 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT.3073.4010' - 1"2438.408' - 0"GREAT ROOMKITCHENPrep KitchenLAUNDRYHOME OFFICE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 3-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen Pantry Powder BONUS ROOM BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A1.11PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 1 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.0PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 2 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH 2 A2.10 __________2 A2.10 __________ Courtyard HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6"BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 4 GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 2 W.I.C. 12080 sgd opt Storage Coats21945.6072' - 0"21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 10363.20 34' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2.10 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 1 A2-30 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.1PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.2PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 6 1 2 34 79121145 FRONT RIGHT 13 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.3PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 7811 12 8 91165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.4PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 1 A2.11 __________ 1 A2.11 __________ 2 A2.11 __________2 A2.11 __________ Storage Laundry 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" Great Room 11'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" Primary Bedroom 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 15'-7" Bedroom 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" Bonus 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-8" Bedroom 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" W.I.C. Bath 3 2-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 13'-7" Courtyard 1-Car Garage 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" CASUAL DINING 12'-0"clg.16'-1" x 18'-1" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 6'-6" HER WIC HIS WIC BATH 4 W.I.C. Coats W.I.C. MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 8'2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 6'-6" 21336.00 70' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"21945.6072' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"26822.4088' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.5PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 326 SF 1 CAR GARAGE 331 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 3601 SF COVERED PATIO 528 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.6PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 638411 2 96358 711 RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.7PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 29 635 8 411 2 96358 7411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.8PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.9PLAN 2 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN GREAT ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HIS WICHER WIC KITCHEN CASUAL DINING BONUS ROOM W.I.C. BATH 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.10PLAN 2 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HOME OFFICE PREP-KITCHEN KITCHEN Great Room T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC HIS WICStorage KITCHEN CASUAL DINING Bonus W.I.C.Bath 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A2.11PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 2 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.0PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 3 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 1 A3.10 __________ 1 A3.10 __________ 2 A3.10 __________2 A3.10 __________PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"PORCH Covered Patio 10'-0"clg.42'-0" x 12'-0" 27432.00 90' - 0" 21945.60 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8" HER WIC HIS WIC W.I.C. BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 2 BATH 2 BATH 3W.I.C. Coats BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9"GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10"KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" GREAT ROOMKITCHEN HER WIC HIS WIC NICHE STORAGE 1-CAR GARAGE LAUNDRY PANTRY PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOMPWDR. W.I.C. BATH 5 HOME PLUS SUITE 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 17'-9" SLEEP 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.1PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.2PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS FRONT RIGHT 1 289 11 1 234 7912131151413 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.3PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 128 11 1 2 38911 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.4PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH 2 A3.11 __________ 2 A3.11 __________ 1 A3.11 __________1 A3.11 __________ W.I.C. BATH 5 BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 13'-4" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 15'-8" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 13'-6" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.17'-7" x 17'-10" FOYER 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 12'-5" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-6" BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" ? BATH 3 W.I.C. Coats BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'6" Primary Bath 11'-0"clg.17'-6" x 9'-9" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 11'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.11'-6" x 6'-2" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-1" x 11'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-8" x 5'-8"NICHE 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 5'-7" BONUS ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 13'-9" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-8" x 5'-3" W.I.C. BATH 4 21945.26 72' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 27431.66 90' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"1828.806' - 0"18291.1760' - 0 1/8"3657.6012' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.5PLAN 3 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AREA Name Area FIRST FLOOR 3874 SF GARAGE 937 SF COVERED PATIO 504 SF PORCH 157 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.6PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 47 9 10115 6 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.7PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 5 3 4 687 3 4 7865 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.8PLAN 3 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WHWH 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:121219.204' - 0"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"5" / 12"5" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12" 7" / 12" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.9PLAN 3 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 3 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PRIMARY BATH LAUNDRY PREP-KITCHEN 2-CAR GARAGE FOYER PWDR.BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.10PLAN 3 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BONUS ROOMPWDR.FOYER2-CAR GARAGEPREP-KITCHENPANTRYPrimary Bath T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE KITCHEN T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A3.11PLAN 3 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 3 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 3 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.0PLAN 4 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 4 STYLE 'A' SOUTHWEST WH WH BATH 2 W.I.C. W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 Linen BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"W.I.C. HER WIC HIS WIC HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 7'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 28651.20 94' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"2 A4.10 __________2 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4.10 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 1 A4-30 __________ 2 A4-30 __________2 A4-30 __________ - --- __________- --- __________ BATH 4 1-CAR GARAGE EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.CoatsFOYER WIC Guest Casita 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM EXERCISE ROOM PWDR.HER WIC HIS WIC STORAGE1-CAR GARAGE Sleep 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 11'-8" BATH 4 Multi-Gen Suite 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 17'-8" 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.1PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT. SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. MULTI-GENERATION SUITE OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.2PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89 11 1 2 34 79121311514 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.3PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1278 11 12 7 91261158 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.4PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 6'-1" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.9'-6" x 7'-7"PANTRY 10'-0"clg.5'-5" x 7'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-5" W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C.BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-1" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 19'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 17'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.19'-7" x 10'-0" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 13'-0" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-2" x 19'-6" BATH 2 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" STORAGE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 7'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.23'-7" x 13'-6" WORK SPACE 10'-0"clg.9'-7" x 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.5'-9" x 5'-8"Coats W.I.C. 2 A4.11 __________2 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4.11 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 1 A4-61 __________ 2 A4-61 __________2 A4-61 __________4876.8016' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"5486.40 18' - 0" 12798.42 41' - 11 7/8" 4879.98 16' - 0 1/8" 5486.40 18' - 0" 28651.20 94' - 0"23774.4078' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.5PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AREA Name Area COVERED PATIO 763 SF COURTYARD 422 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 4355 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 480 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.6PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 3 8 11 26 35 8 7119 FRONT RIGHT 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.7PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. SIMPLE 1-3 STORY STRUCTURES 2. FLAT ROOF SHAPES OF VARYING HEIGHTS 3. PARAPET ROOFS OF VARYING HEIGHTS 4. DOORS AND WINDOWS FLUSH WITH WALL SURFACE 5. DETAIL DEFINING ENTRIES 6. STUCCO COLUMNS AND WALLS 7. DEEP SET WINDOWS AND DOORS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 8. BELBURN TILE 9. ADHERED MASONRY VENEER ACCENTS 10. VARIATION OF MATERIALS AND TEXTURES TO CREATE INTEREST AND CONTRAST 11. NEUTRAL COLOR PALETTE TO BLEND WITH THE NATURAL LANDSCAPE 2 6 3 8411 2 963 58411 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.8PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 1/4" / 12" 7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"4' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.9PLAN 4 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. BEDROOM 4 KITCHEN PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY MUDROOM FOYER FORMAL DINING PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.10PLAN 4 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. PANTRY 2-CAR GARAGE T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER FORMAL DININGMUDROOMPANTRY PREP-KITCHENKITCHENBEDROOM 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM PRIMARY BATH T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A4.11PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 4 SOUTHWEST TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA AUGUST 2, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.0PLAN 5 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 5 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE HIS WIC HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.6'-3" x 11'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0"READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3"PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" STORAGE BATH 5 W.I.C. BATH 4 BATH 3 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 2 WICBEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" STORAGE ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11"GLASS WALL/SGD OPTBOOKSHELF OPTWINE RACK OPT 1 A5.10 __________ 1 A5.10 __________ 2 A5.10 __________2 A5.10 __________ 14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0"34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"20116.8066' - 0"FORMAL DINING BEDROOM 4 BATH 5 BATH 4 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.1PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT. DELUXE PREP KITCHEN OPT. MEDIA ROOM OPT. MULTI-GENERATIONAL SUITE OPT. GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.2PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 3 478912131114 1 28911 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.3PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS REAR LEFT 1 28 11 1 2 961158 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.4PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 2 A5.11 __________2 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ 1 A5.11 __________ WIC BATH 6 FORMAL DINING 10'-0"clg.15'-11" x 14'-0" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.17'-8" x 11'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.13'-9" x 9'-7" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" x 21'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.11'-8" x 7'-7"W.I.C. 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 7'-9" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.6'-0" x 7'-7" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.6'-7" x 7'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.8'-8" x 11'-3" READING ROOM 10'-0"clg.15'-0" x 11'-3" FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-7" KITCHEN 12'-0"clg.10'-4" x 21'-7" GREAT ROOM 12'-0"clg.31'-4" x 21'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"BEDROOM 5 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" BEDROOM 3 10'-0"clg.13'-7" x 11'-8" ZOOM 10'-0"clg.5'-9" X 7'-11" LAUNDRY STORAGE W.I.C. BATH 5 W.I.C. W.I.C. BATH 3 BATH 4 BATH 2 WIC BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.11'-7" x 13'-7"HIS WIC HER WIC 20116.8066' - 0"14020.80 46' - 0" 14630.40 48' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 34137.60 112' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.5PLAN 5 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLAN 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AREA Name Area GARAGE 971 SF FIRST FLOOR 4834 SF COVERED PATIO 476 SF PORCH 125 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.6PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 11911 3 4 7561110 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.7PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756 8 34 98 1165 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.8PLAN 5 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR 7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12" 11" / 12"1/4" / 12"11" / 12"7" / 12"7" / 12"11" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 1219.204' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.9PLAN 5 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 5 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 3BEDROOM 2 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.10PLAN 5 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. FOYER T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. HER WIC EXERCISE ROOM PRIMARY BEDROOM STORAGE KITCHEN GREAT ROOM BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 3 T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A5.11PLAN 5 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 5 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 5 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.0PLAN 6 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 6 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH HIS WIC HER WIC2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" x 9'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8"COATSGREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6"KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6"CASUAL DINING PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 13'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" 12080 SGD OPT 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"17' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7"BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC BATH 3 PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" WIC POWDER LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" BONUS ROOM 9'-0"clg.17'-7" X 19'-3" OTB wet bar opt 1 A6.10 __________1 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ 2 A6.10 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"609.602' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"17373.6057' - 0"PRIMARY BATH PRIMARY BEDROOM HIS WIC HER WIC LAUNDRY POWDER PRIMARY BATH 2 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 HIS WIC HER WIC OTB 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.1PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT STACKED W/D WITH SINK OPT SUPER SHOWER OPT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.2PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 28911 34 79121311515 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.3PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 811 1 2 98 12115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.4PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" X 21'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.7'-7" X 9'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.7'-7"x11'-8" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" GREAT ROOM HIGHclg.31'-4" X 19'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-6" X 17'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COATS PWDR. 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 3'-7" FOYER HIGHclg.10'-1" X 13'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 5'-7" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.7'-6" X 13'-5" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-7" x 11'-8" 1-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 13'-6" CASUAL DINING 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ 15240.00 50' - 0" 5486.08 18' - 0" 20726.08 68' - 0"3048.0010' - 0"13411.2044' - 0"5486.4018' - 0"21336.0070' - 0"HIS WIC HER WIC POWDER BATH 3 WIC OTB OTB WIC BATH 4 PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 13'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-8" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.11'-7" X 13'-7" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.6'-3" X 6'-0" 2 A6.11 __________ 2 A6.11 __________ 1 A6.11 __________1 A6.11 __________ BATH 4 5486.40 18' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 5486.40 18' - 0" 17068.80 56' - 0"5791.2019' - 0"11582.4038' - 0"16764.0055' - 0"820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.5PLAN 6 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AREA Name Area COURTYARD 267 SF 1-CAR GARAGE 314 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF COVERED PATIO 500 SF FIRST FLOOR 2649 SF DECK 290 SF SECOND FLOOR 1848 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.6PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 7562 8 234 79610115 8 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.7PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 8567 234 9610115 8 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.8PLAN 6 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 11.0:12 11.0:12 1.5:1211.0:1211.0:121/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" DECK BELOW 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:121/4" / 12"1219.204' - 0"3.0:123.0:12 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.9PLAN 6 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 6 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC HER WICHIS WIC PRIMARY BATH BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.10PLAN 6 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE MUDROOM FOYER HIS WIC PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HER WICPRIMARY BATH 2HIS WIC BONUS ROOM T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM FOYER T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A6.11PLAN 6 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 6 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 6 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.0PLAN 7 FRONT ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 STYLE 'C' AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PLAN 7 STYLE 'B' PRAIRIE WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HIS WIC HER WIC COURTYARD POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7" PREP-KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6"GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6"COATSDOG WASH OPT 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________4267.2014' - 0"9144.0030' - 0"6705.6022' - 0"6705.60 22' - 0" 6705.60 22' - 0" 4876.80 16' - 0" 7924.80 26' - 0"10363.2034' - 0"4876.8016' - 0"4267.2014' - 0"20116.80 66' - 0" 6096.00 20' - 0" 6645.28 21' - 9 5/8" 13471.53 44' - 2 3/8" 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION PLEXIGLASS GUARDRAIL OPTION 1 A7.10 __________1 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 2 A7.10 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 1 A7-30 __________ 3 A7-31 __________3 A7-31 __________4 A7-31 __________ 4 A7-31 __________ PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" ENTERTAINMENT LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" W.I.C. BATH 3 W.I.C. BATH 4 HER WIC HIS WIC EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" BEDROOM 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" KITCHEN CASUAL DINING GREAT ROOM PRIMARY BATH HER WIC HIS WIC 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.1PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF SUPER SHOWER OPT SLIDING GLASS DOOR OPT GUEST CASITA OPT. 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.2PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2 89116 12 3 4 7912131158 FRONT RIGHT 14 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.3PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROOF 2. ASPHALT SHINGLES OR SMOOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 3. 2X4 WOOD APPEARANCE WINDOW AND DOOR TRIM 4. HORIZONTAL SIDING ACCENTS 5. GARAGE DOOR PATTERNS COMPLIMENTARY TO THE STYLE 6. SIDE ELEVATION GABLE FORM 7. VERTICAL MULTI-PANNED WINDOWS 8. LIGHT TO MEDIUM SAND FINISH STUCCO ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 10. 18" OVERHANGS 11. 5:12, 7:12 & 11:12 ROOF PITCHES 12. BELBURN TILE 13. BROW ENTRY AND ACCENT DETAILING 14. FAUX GABLE END VENT DETAILING 15. STANDING SEAM ROOF ACCENTS 1 2811 1 2 6 9128115 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.4PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" X 21'-6" Prep Kitchen 10'-0"clg.12'-6" x 7'-7" PANTRY 10'-0"clg.8'-6" x 7'-7" 2-CAR GARAGE 10'-0"clg.21'-6" x 21'-7"FOYER 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 9'-6" COURTYARD PRIMARY BEDROOM 2 10'-0"clg.19'-6" x 15'-6" HIS WIC HER WIC PRIMARY BATH 2 10'-0"clg.15'-7" x 11'-8" HOME OFFICE 10'-0"clg.13'-8" x 13'-6" POWDER 10'-0"clg.5'-6" x 7'-7" W.I.C. BATH 5 GREAT ROOM 10'-0"clg.33'-3" x 19'-6" KITCHEN 10'-0"clg.10'-4" x 19'-6" CASUAL DINING LAUNDRY 10'-0"clg.9'-0" x 7'-6" MUDROOM 10'-0"clg.12'-1" x 7'-6" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ Bedroom 4 9'-0"clg.13'-7" X 13'-6" EXERCISE ROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 9'-7" PRIMARY BATH 10'-0"clg.13'-7" X 16'-8" PRIMARY BEDROOM 10'-0"clg.17'-6" X 16'-7" HER WIC HIS WIC DECK W.I.C. BATH 3 ENTERTAINMENT 9'-0"clg.14'-1" X 10'-0" LAUNDRY 9'-0"clg.7'-0" X 9'-11" BEDROOM 3 9'-0"clg.13'-6" X 13'-8" 2 A7.11 __________ 2 A7.11 __________ 1 A7.11 __________1 A7.11 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 1 A7-62 __________ 2 A7-62 __________2 A7-62 __________ 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.5PLAN 7 PRAIRIE FLOOR PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AREA Name Area 2-CAR GARAGE 488 SF 2-CAR GARAGE 483 SF FIRST FLOOR 2874 SF COURTYARD 243 SF COVERED PATIO 616 SF SECOND FLOOR 2100 SF DECK 193 SF DECK 507 SF 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.6PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4 756289 3 4 75628910 FRONT RIGHT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.7PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ELEVATIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH ELEMENTS FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. HORIZONTAL DESIGN ELEMENTS 2. 2-STORY MASSING WITH ONE STORY ELEMENTS 3. HIP ROOF DESIGN WITH BOXED STUCCO 4. 3:12 TO 4.5:12 ROOF PITCH 5.SMOOTH FLAT CONCRETE TILES 6. EARTH TONES WITH CONTRASTING TRIM 7. VERTICAL WINDOWS AT FIRST FLOOR 8. DEEP OVERHANGS ELEMENTS NOT FROM DESIGN GUIDELINES 9. STONE VENEER 10. BELBURN TILE 11. FLAT ROOF ACCENT MASSING (ENTRY DETAIL) 3 4756 8 347 6 8 95 REAR LEFT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.8PLAN 7 PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH FRONT REAR WH WH WH WH 5.0:125.0:1211.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 11.0:12 5.0:125.0:121/4" / 12"COURTYARD DECK BELOW 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1/4" / 12"3.0:123.0:12 3.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 3.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:123.0:12 3.0:12 DECK BELOW COURTYARD 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.9PLAN 7 ROOF PLANS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 18" OVERHANGS TYP. PLAN 7 PRAIRIE ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 48" OVERHANGS TYP. T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. 2-CAR GARAGE PREP-KITCHEN PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM PRIMARY BATH T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER T.O. BEAM DECK ENTERTAINMENT 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.10PLAN 7 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 FARMHOUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. PRIMARY BATH 2-CAR GARAGE Prep Kitchen PANTRY COURTYARD ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM T.O. PL. T.O. CONC. HDR HGT. T.O. SHTG. T.O. PLATE HDR. HGT. GREAT ROOM COURTYARD FOYER DECK ENTERTAINMENT T.O. BEAM 820 16th St., Suite 500 Denver, CO 80202 ktgy.com 303.825.6400 Architecture + Planning TEMECULA, CA JULY 28, 2022 PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 A7.11PLAN 7 PRAIRIE SECTIONS 210991 SHAWOOD AT SOMMERS BEND BUILDING DEPARTMENTWH/SHRH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1PLAN 7 PRAIRIE TRANSVERSE SECTION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2PLAN 7 PRAIRIE LONGITUDINAL SECTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0496, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 21 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR SIX (6) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH THREE (3) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 18 LOTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE EIR AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 3, 2022, Woodside Homes filed Planning Application No. PA22-0496 a Home Product Review (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0496, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Home Product Review Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City’s Development Code. The project is also consistent with General Plan land use of Specific Plan Implementation. The site is properly planned and zoned and, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Nothing proposed in the Home Product Review is anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Environmental Impact Report or addenda prepared for the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Home Product Review: The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 18 lots of Planning Area 21. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0496, Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Wats, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22-0496 Sommers Bend PA21 Shawood HPR: Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-760-001 964-760-002 964-760-003 964-760-004 964-760-005 964-760-006 964-760-007 964-760-008 964-760-009 964-760-010 964-760-011 964-770-001 964-770-002 964-770-003 964-770-004 964-770-005 964-770-006 964-770-007 964-770-009 964-770-011 Exempt Per Development Agreement (DA) No. 2016-0156276 MSHCP Category: Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 Exempt Per DA No. 2016-0156276 October 19, 2022 October 19, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (not located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) Page 1 of 11 PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 11 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11. 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016 and Operating Memorandums. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Page 3 of 11 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent architectural style, materials, equipment, finishes or similar matters as specified in the Home Product Review plans, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an architectural style, materials, equipment, or finishes that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 14. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 15. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 16. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 17. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in lieu fees based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 18. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 19. Page 4 of 11 Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 20. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 21. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor as defined in the Eastern Municipal Water District water use guidelines. 22. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes above three (3) feet and common areas. 23. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron, tubular steel, or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 24. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 25. Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted. 26. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Page 5 of 11 Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 27. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 28. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 29. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping for slopes greater than three (3) feet within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 30. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed. 31. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be installed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 32. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 33. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 34. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 35. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 36. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 37. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 38. Page 6 of 11 Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, (iv) Tentative Tract Map No. 37368, and/or (v) Tentative Tract Map No. 37341, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a.First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b.Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c.Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 d.Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37368 e.Fifth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 37341 39. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Landscape Easement Relocation. The Developer shall provide a recorded copy of the relocation of the landscape easement to Public Works. 40. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 41. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 42. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 43. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 44. Page 7 of 11 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 45. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 46. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 47. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 48. Driveways. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18’ in depth from back of sidewalk. 49. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 50. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 51. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 52. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Page 8 of 11 Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 53. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 54. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 55. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 56. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 57. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 58. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 59. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy C ode, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 60. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 61. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 62. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 63. Page 9 of 11 Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 64. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 65. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 66. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 67. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 68. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 69. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 70. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 71. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 65,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 72. Page 10 of 11 Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 73. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 74. Two Point Access. This development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two points of access, via all -weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 75. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of fire sprinkler plans and hydraulic calculations are required for each structure. The fire flow test can be no older than 6-months old per Chapter 80 amendments of the fire code. 76. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Hydrant Markers. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots per Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 77. Page 11 of 11 VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com October 20, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA22-0496, Home Product Review (Development Plan) for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 1997121030 Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA21 (PA22-0496) Project Location: Tract 37341-13 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 19, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the EIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the EIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the EIR. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report and Addenda that were prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Woodside Homes Project Title: Sommers Bend Home Product Review PA21 (PA22-0496) Location: Tract 37341-13 Project Description: Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Home Product Review for Planning Area 21 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five EIR Addendums have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR Addendum and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively, “Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the EIR and Addenda as the proposed project merely implements the development that was already contemplated and analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The EIR and Addenda analyzed the impacts of the construction of single family homes on 18 lots of Planning Area 21. As such, the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Additionally, the proposed project does not require the preparation of an addendum to the EIR as there are no changes or additions to the proposed project from what was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. Therefore, no further environmental review is required as all environmental impacts of the proposed project were analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated as set forth in the EIR and Addenda. Moreover, the mitigation measures imposed as part of the EIR and Addenda remain valid and applicable to the proposed project. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA22-0494, PA22-0495, PA22-0496 APPLICANT: Woodside Homes PROPOSAL: Home Product Review Applications for Sommers Bend Planning Area 19 (PA22-0494) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 16 lots; Planning Area 20B (PA22-0495) to allow for four (4) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 23 lots; and Planning Area 21 (PA22-0496) to allow for six (6) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 18 lots. The projects are located within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Section exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: October 19, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2022 PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application Number PA22-0996, a Modification Application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Jarrod Short General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Specific Plan 5 (Old Town) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Lot / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Existing Multifamily Residential / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Existing Multifamily Residential / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) East: Murrieta Creek / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Pujol Street, Existing Church, Vacant Lot, Residential / Specific Plan Implementation 2 Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 2.27 Acres 0.087 Acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: 26.5% N/A Parking Provided/Required: 102 (Minor Exception Application) 113 (Per Gov. Code 65915(p)(1)) AFFORDABLE/WORKFORCE HOUSING Located in Housing Element Vacant Sites Inventory (5th ) Yes No Located in Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ)? Yes No AHOZ Gain/Loss: + N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY On February 20, 2019, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA18-0081 and PA18-0497. This approval allowed for a three-story affordable multi-family housing project and related Tentative Parcel Map. The project totaled sixty units with fifteen units available for special needs occupants (twelve units for autism and three units for sensory) and created one lot from three. On September 21, 2022, Jarrod Sharp submitted Planning Application PA22-0996, a Modification application to allow revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval for PA18-0081 and PA18-0497. The applicant is seeking financial incentives from the State of California. The State has set timing thresholds for project milestones in order to remain eligible for the incentives. These revisions have been requested by the applicant in order to facilitate timing compliance with State of California requirements. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The modification application will allow for revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval (COA) for both the Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map. These COA amendments will focus on adjusting the implementation timing or removal of certain conditions. Timing revisions include, but are not limited to, when the Final Map needs to be reviewed and approved and when existing overhead wires need to be relocated underground. The applicant seeks to remove conditions, including, among others, the Burrowing Owl survey and internal downspout requirements. More Specifically, the applicant seeks to remove or modify the following Development Plan (PA18-0081) COAs: 3 Planning Department Revisions 21. Landscape Pre-construction Meeting. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits the start of construction, a pre-construction landscape meeting shall be held between the project manager, assigned Planner, and the City’s landscape consultant. 36. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 42. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized. 57. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include Prior to the start of construction, detailed plans for outdoor areas including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc. to match the style of the building shall be submitted for approval by the Director of Community Development. 59. Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision be installed per the approved entitlement plans; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development approval. Public Works Revisions 79. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 89. Move from Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved CLOMR shall be 4 submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 100. Final Map. Parcel Map No.37510 shall be approved and recorded submitted for review. 101. Western Bypass Corridor. The developer shall record a written offer to participate in and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be approved by the City. 102. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans (and the construction plans for landscaped medians) shall be approved submitted to by Public Works for review and approval The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, As outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards, all street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard – 60’ R/W) to include removal of existing curb and sidewalk, installation of rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 103. Move from Prior to Issuance of Building Permit to Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider ’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 104 Move from Prior to Issuance of Building Permit to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved LOMR shall be submitted to Public Works. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 106. Certifications. Should the start of grading be delayed, the required certifications shall be submitted prior to scheduling the first building inspection. The certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 107. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes 5 all on site work (including water quality facilities), the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement, and public improvements including but not limited to: a. Pujol Street Improvements b. Streetlights shall be installed and operational Additional Conditions of Approval not included with the original approval 111. Include with Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Final Map. Parcel Map No. 37510 shall be approved and recorded 112. Include with Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvements shall be completed: a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard – 60’ R/W) to include removal of existing curb and sidewalk, installation of rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). Building and Safety Revisions 128. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety- (4) complete sets of plans and (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval (Trusses can be deferred), including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable plan scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Study in accordance with the provisions of Section 1207 of the 2016 2019 Edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. Fire Revisions 135. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 3,500 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi-family. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. There may be two points of connections required in order to meet the onsite fire hydrant fire flow as well as the fire sprinkler demands. Number of connection points will be determined by Rancho Water and the Civil Engineer. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Revisions to the Tentative Parcel Map (PA18-0497) include the following: Public Works Revisions 24. Western Bypass Corridor. The developer shall record a written offer to participate in and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community 6 Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be approved by the City. 25. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard – 60’ R/W) to include removal of existing curb and sidewalk, installation of rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 27. Move to Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider ’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements 37. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA -approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 43. Final Map. Parcel Map No.37510 shall be approved and recorded submitted for review. 45. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved LOMR shall be submitted to Public Works. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 46. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 47. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes 7 all on site work (including water quality facilities) and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement, and public improvements including but not limited to: a. Pujol Street Improvements b. Streetlights shall be installed and operational Additional Conditions of Approval not included with the original approval: 51. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Final Map. Parcel Map No.37510 shall be approved and recorded. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press-Enterprise on October 6, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRS and Negative Declarations) An MND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) as part of the original project approval. The MND identified no areas where impacts were considered Significant and Unavoidable. The current modification application will allow for the utilization of external downspouts and various revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval. None of these revisions are anticipated to intensify impacts to the previously analyzed and approved MND. FINDINGS Modifications (Section 17.05.030.E) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project was originally approved as an affordable housing development. The modification will allow for revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval (COA) for both the Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map. These COA amendments will focus on adjusting the implementation timing or removal of certain conditions. Timing revisions include, but are not limited to, when the Final Map needs to be reviewed and approved and when existing overhead wires need to be relocated underground. Condition removals include, among others, the Burrowing Owl survey and internal downspout requirements. The project will remain an affordable housing development upon completion of the modification. Negative impacts are not anticipated. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. 8 The project has been reviewed to ensure that it is consistent with the Building and Development Codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. Negative Impacts are not anticipated. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Revised Development Plan and Map Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Public Hearing 6. Draft Notice of Exemption for County Clerk FELIXVALDEZAV FIFTH STOLD TO W N FRONT STMIMSY WYTHIRD STMAIN STSIXTH STPUJOL ST FOURTH STCi ty of Temecula PA18-0081 This m ap w as made by the C ity of Temecul a Geographi c Inform ati on System .The m ap is deriv ed fr om base data pr oduc ed by the Ri versi de County Assessor'sDepartment and the Transportation and Land M anagem ent Agency of Ri versi deCounty. T he C ity of Tem ec ul a ass um es no warr anty or l egal responsi bi l i ty for theinformation contained on thi s m ap. Data and i nform ati on represented on thi s m apare s ubj ec t to update and m odi fication. The Geographi c Inform ati on System andother sourc es shoul d be quer ied for the m ost current i nform ati on.This m ap i s not for r epr i nt or resal e. 0 500250Feet N Proj ect Site DDDDCOPYRIGHT DATEPacific West Architecture 430 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 100EAGLE, IDAHO 83616(208) 461−0022fax (208) 461−3267ALASKA −ARIZONA −CALIFORNIA −COLORADO −HAWAII −IDAHO −LOUISIANA −MONTANA −NEW MEXICO −NEVADA −NORTH DAKOTA −OREGON − SOUTH DAKOTA −U.S.V.I. −UTAH −WASHINGTON −WYOMINGDRAWN BYPROJECT #THIS DRAWING CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. NO UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OR DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT BY PACIFIC WEST ARCHITECTURE©PROJECTTEMECULA, CAAPN # 922−053−021, 922−053−047, 922−053−048 A6.1A08/26/22VINE CREEKAPARTMENTSPWH16−2 −PA18−0081BUILDING PERMIT SET −PC1 SUBMITTAL 08/26/2228580 & 28590 Pujol St.NRCN.T.S.2COLOR BOARD - BLDG. A - SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONSMOOTH STUCCO SIDINGCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "CLASSICAL WHITE" SW 2829 OR EQUALADOOR, WINDOW, BELLY BAND TRIMCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" SW2808 OR EQUALBCLOTH OVERHANGSOLARIUM OUTDOORCANVAS "RAVE CHERRY"# 13094388ESPANISH TILE ROOFINGCOLOR TO MATCH BORAL AMERICA ROOFING 2−PIECE MISSION TILE "PALERMO BLEND"ICOLOR TO MATCH HALQUIST STONE CASTLESTONE COLLECTION "LISBON BIANCO"WINDOW & GLAZINGLOW−E SOLAR FLOAT GLASSFWINDOW FRAMECOLOR TO MATCH ALSIDE "AMERICAN TERRA" OR EQUALGSTONE PAVERSACKER STONE PRODUCTS’TERRA COTTA’, FACE MIX W/ GRIND FINISHJWALL MTD. ELECTRICAL LIGHT FIXTURESLITHONIA / CLARITY BRAND COLOR TO MATCH "OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALLWROUGHT IRON RAILING & DOWNSPOUTSDECORATIVE, POWDER COATED.COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROYCRAFT BRONZE GREEN" SW2846 OR EQUALDATTIC VENTSHCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD TERRA COTTA" SW2803 OR EQUALWOOD STRUCTURE & TRELLISCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "RIVERWOOD" STAIN, SW3507CKSTONEMNERI MODELS: POST 1362.701, WITH 4102.116.500 TOP, AND S323 LANTERN (SEE E1.00 FOR LOCATIONS −TYPE 3 & 4 FIXTURES)E1.2 FOR SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAILS"OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALSITE POLE LIGHTING FIXTUREREVISIONS1 Ongoing Coordination 08/30/2212" = 1'-0"1COLOR BOARD - BLDG. A - NORTHEAST ELEVATION DDCOPYRIGHT DATEPacific West Architecture 430 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 100EAGLE, IDAHO 83616(208) 461−0022fax (208) 461−3267ALASKA −ARIZONA −CALIFORNIA −COLORADO −HAWAII −IDAHO −LOUISIANA −MONTANA −NEW MEXICO −NEVADA −NORTH DAKOTA −OREGON − SOUTH DAKOTA −U.S.V.I. −UTAH −WASHINGTON −WYOMINGDRAWN BYPROJECT #THIS DRAWING CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. NO UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OR DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT BY PACIFIC WEST ARCHITECTURE©PROJECTTEMECULA, CAAPN # 922−053−021, 922−053−047, 922−053−048 A6.2*08/26/22VINE CREEKAPARTMENTSPWH16−2 −PA18−0081BUILDING PERMIT SET −PC1 SUBMITTAL 08/26/2228580 & 28590 Pujol St.NRCN.T.S.1COLOR BOARD - BLDG. A - NORTHWEST ELEVATIONN.T.S.2COLOR BOARD - BLDG. A - SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONDOOR, WINDOW, BELLY BAND TRIMCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" SW2808 OR EQUALBCLOTH OVERHANGSOLARIUM OUTDOORCANVAS "RAVE CHERRY"# 13094388ESPANISH TILE ROOFINGCOLOR TO MATCH BORAL AMERICA ROOFING 2−PIECE MISSION TILE "PALERMO BLEND"ICOLOR TO MATCH HALQUIST STONE CASTLESTONE COLLECTION "LISBON BIANCO"WINDOW & GLAZINGLOW−E SOLAR FLOAT GLASSFWINDOW FRAMECOLOR TO MATCH ALSIDE "AMERICAN TERRA" OR EQUALGSTONE PAVERSACKER STONE PRODUCTS’TERRA COTTA’, FACE MIX W/ GRIND FINISHJWALL MTD. ELECTRICAL LIGHT FIXTURESLITHONIA / CLARITY BRAND COLOR TO MATCH "OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALLWROUGHT IRON RAILINGDECORATIVE, POWDER COATED.COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROYCRAFT BRONZE GREEN" SW2846 OR EQUALDATTIC VENTSHCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD TERRA COTTA" SW2803 OR EQUALWOOD STRUCTURE & TRELLISCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "RIVERWOOD" STAIN, SW3507CKSTONEMNERI MODELS: POST 1362.701, WITH 4102.116.500 TOP, AND S323 LANTERN (SEE E1.00 FOR LOCATIONS −TYPE 3 & 4 FIXTURES)E1.2 FOR SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAILS"OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALSITE POLE LIGHTING FIXTURESMOOTH STUCCO SIDINGCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "CLASSICAL WHITE" SW 2829 OR EQUALAREVISIONS1 Ongoing Coordination 08/30/22 DCOPYRIGHT DATEPacific West Architecture 430 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 100EAGLE, IDAHO 83616(208) 461−0022fax (208) 461−3267ALASKA −ARIZONA −CALIFORNIA −COLORADO −HAWAII −IDAHO −LOUISIANA −MONTANA −NEW MEXICO −NEVADA −NORTH DAKOTA −OREGON − SOUTH DAKOTA −U.S.V.I. −UTAH −WASHINGTON −WYOMINGDRAWN BYPROJECT #THIS DRAWING CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. NO UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OR DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT BY PACIFIC WEST ARCHITECTURE©PROJECTTEMECULA, CAAPN # 922−053−047−6, 922−053−021−2, 922−053−048−7 A12.1*08/26/22VINE CREEKAPARTMENTSPWH16−2 −− PA18−0081BUILDING PERMIT SET −PC1 SUBMITTAL 08/26/2228580 & 28590 PUJOL STREETNRCN.T.S.1COLOR BOARD - BLDG. B - NORTHEAST ELEVATIONN.T.S.2COLOR BOARD - BLDG. B - SOUTHWEST ELEVATIONDOOR, WINDOW, BELLY BAND TRIMCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" SW2808 OR EQUALBCLOTH OVERHANGSOLARIUM OUTDOORCANVAS "RAVE CHERRY"# 13094388ESPANISH TILE ROOFINGCOLOR TO MATCH BORAL AMERICA ROOFING 2−PIECE MISSION TILE "PALERMO BLEND"ICOLOR TO MATCH HALQUIST STONE CASTLESTONE COLLECTION "LISBON BIANCO"WINDOW & GLAZINGLOW−E SOLAR FLOAT GLASSFWINDOW FRAMECOLOR TO MATCH ALSIDE "AMERICAN TERRA" OR EQUALGSTONE PAVERSACKER STONE PRODUCTS’TERRA COTTA’, FACE MIX W/ GRIND FINISHJWALL MTD. ELECTRICAL LIGHT FIXTURESLITHONIA / CLARITY BRAND COLOR TO MATCH "OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALLDECORATIVE, POWDER COATED.COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROYCRAFT BRONZE GREEN" SW2846 OR EQUALDATTIC VENTSHCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD TERRA COTTA" SW2803 OR EQUALWOOD STRUCTURE & TRELLISCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "RIVERWOOD" STAIN, SW3507CKSTONEMNERI MODELS: POST 1362.701, WITH 4102.116.500 TOP, AND S323 LANTERN (SEE E1.00 FOR LOCATIONS −TYPE 3 & 4 FIXTURES)E1.2 FOR SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAILS"OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALSITE POLE LIGHTING FIXTURESMOOTH STUCCO SIDINGCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "CLASSICAL WHITE" SW 2829 OR EQUALAWROUGHT IRON RAILING & DOWNSPOUTSREVISIONS1 Revision 1 Date 1 DCOPYRIGHT DATEPacific West Architecture 430 E. STATE STREET, SUITE 100EAGLE, IDAHO 83616(208) 461−0022fax (208) 461−3267ALASKA −ARIZONA −CALIFORNIA −COLORADO −HAWAII −IDAHO −LOUISIANA −MONTANA −NEW MEXICO −NEVADA −NORTH DAKOTA −OREGON − SOUTH DAKOTA −U.S.V.I. −UTAH −WASHINGTON −WYOMINGDRAWN BYPROJECT #THIS DRAWING CONTAINS INFORMATION WHICH IS THE PROPRIETARY PROPERTY OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. NO UNAUTHORIZED REUSE OR DUPLICATION OF THESE PLANS OR ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF DOUGLAS L. GIBSON. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNTIL IT IS SIGNED BY THE ARCHITECT. COPYRIGHT BY PACIFIC WEST ARCHITECTURE©PROJECTTEMECULA, CAAPN # 922−053−047−6, 922−053−021−2, 922−053−048−7 A12.2*08/26/22VINE CREEKAPARTMENTSPWH16−2 −− PA18−0081BUILDING PERMIT SET −PC1 SUBMITTAL 08/26/2228580 & 28590 PUJOL STREETNRCN.T.S.1COLOR BOARD - BLDG. B - SOUTHEAST ELEVATIONN.T.S.2COLOR BOARD - BLDG. B - NORTHWEST ELEVATIONDOOR, WINDOW, BELLY BAND TRIMCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD DARK BROWN" SW2808 OR EQUALBCLOTH OVERHANGSOLARIUM OUTDOORCANVAS "RAVE CHERRY"# 13094388ESPANISH TILE ROOFINGCOLOR TO MATCH BORAL AMERICA ROOFING 2−PIECE MISSION TILE "PALERMO BLEND"ICOLOR TO MATCH HALQUIST STONE CASTLESTONE COLLECTION "LISBON BIANCO"WINDOW & GLAZINGLOW−E SOLAR FLOAT GLASSFWINDOW FRAMECOLOR TO MATCH ALSIDE "AMERICAN TERRA" OR EQUALGSTONE PAVERSACKER STONE PRODUCTS’TERRA COTTA’, FACE MIX W/ GRIND FINISHJWALL MTD. ELECTRICAL LIGHT FIXTURESLITHONIA / CLARITY BRAND COLOR TO MATCH "OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALLDECORATIVE, POWDER COATED.COLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROYCRAFT BRONZE GREEN" SW2846 OR EQUALDATTIC VENTSHCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "ROCKWOOD TERRA COTTA" SW2803 OR EQUALWOOD STRUCTURE & TRELLISCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "RIVERWOOD" STAIN, SW3507CKSTONEMNERI MODELS: POST 1362.701, WITH 4102.116.500 TOP, AND S323 LANTERN (SEE E1.00 FOR LOCATIONS −TYPE 3 & 4 FIXTURES)E1.2 FOR SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE DETAILS"OLD WORLD GRAY TEXTURE" OR EQUALSITE POLE LIGHTING FIXTURESMOOTH STUCCO SIDINGCOLOR TO MATCH SHERWIN WILLIAMS "CLASSICAL WHITE" SW 2829 OR EQUALAWROUGHT IRON RAILING & DOWNSPOUTSREVISIONS1 Revision 1 Date 1 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0996, A MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW FOR CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BE AMENDED FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED AFFORDABLE RESIDENTIAL PROJECT GENERALLY LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN STREET AND PUJOL STREET INTERSECTION, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) SECTION 15162, SUBSEQUENT EIRS AND NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS (APN NOS. 922-053-047, 922-053-048, 922- 053-021) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 20, 2019, the Planning Commission approved Planning Applications Nos. PA18-0081, a Development Plan, PA18-1230, A Minor Exception, PA18-0497, a Tentative Parcel Map, and PA18-0692, a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness collectively known as Vine Creek (“Project”) B. On September 21, 2022, Jarrod Short filed Planning Application No. PA22-0996 Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0996 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modifications, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project was originally approved as an affordable housing development. The modification application will allow for revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval (COA) for both the Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map. These COA amendments will focus on adjusting the implementation timing or removal of certain conditions. Timing revisions include, but are not limited to, when the Final Map needs to be reviewed and approved and when existing overhead wires need to be relocated underground. Condition removals include, among others, the Burrowing Owl Survey and internal downspout requirements. The project will remain an affordable housing development upon completion of the modification. Negative impacts are not anticipated. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed to ensure that it is consistent with the Building and Development Codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. Negative Impacts are not anticipated. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRS and Negative Declarations) An MND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) as part of the original project approval. The MND identified no areas where impacts were considered Significant and Unavoidable. The current modification application will allow for the utilization of external downspouts and various revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval. None of these revisions are anticipated to intensify impacts to the previously analyzed and approved MND. Section 4. Conditions, Statement of Operations, and Plans. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0996, a Modification Application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection., subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE Planning Application Number: PA22-0996 By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not limited to) any referenced documents, local state, or federal regulations, statement of operations, hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and understand them. I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions. Property Owner Printed Name _________________________ Applicant Printed Name _________________________ Property Owner Signature & Date ___________________________ Applicant Signature & Date ___________________________ Parcel Number(s): 922-053-021 922-053-047 922-053-048 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA 22-0996 Vine Creek Apartments DP: A Development Plan to allow an all affordable multi-family project totaling 60 units. The project is generally located approximately 130 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection on the east side of Pujol Street. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-053-021 922-053-047 922-053-048 Greater Than 14.1 DU MSHCP Category: Residential Attached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Per WRCOG Requirements Multi-Family Attached (Five or More Units) October 19, 2022 October 19, 2023 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not Located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Four Hundred and Four Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($2,404.75) which includes the Two Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($2,354.75) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. 1. General Requirements ADA Parking. All ADA parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 2. Page 1 of 20 Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 5 (Old Town). 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 7. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 9. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three-foot-by-three-foot section of the building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 10. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 11. Page 2 of 20 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Main Walls: Smooth Stucco, Sherwin Williams Classic White #SW2829 Door/Window Trim: Sherwin Williams Rockwood Dark Brown #SW2808 Wrought Iron Railing: Powder Coated Sherwin Williams Roycraft Bronze Green #SW2846 Cloth Overhang: Canvas Solarium Outdoor #13094388 Attic Vents: Sherwin Williams Rockwood Terra Cotta #SW2803 Roof: Tile Boral American Roofing Palermo Blend Pavers: Stone, Acker Stone Products Terra Cotta Grind Finish Stone Siding: Halquist Stone Castlestone Lisbon Blanco Wall Mounted Light Fixtures: Lithonia / Clarity Brand Site Pole Light Fixture: Neri Models Post1362.701, 4102.116.500, S323 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 16. Number of Affordable Housing Units. The owner shall, without economic or other contribution by the City, identify, construct, and thereafter maintain, not less than 59 units for and as affordable housing units. The developer shall ensure the continued affordability of all very low and low-income retail units. Units shall be maintained as affordable units by means of a Disposition and Development Agreement and covenant/deed restriction that burdens the title to the subject property for the benefit of the City, for the purpose of ensuring that the units are maintained as affordable for not less than 55 years. The form of agreement and covenant/deed restriction shall, for the City, be subject to the approval of the City Manager and City Attorney. 17. Mix of Affordable Housing Units. The agreement shall specify, in addition to all other terms deemed necessary by the City and owner to effectuate the intent of the parties, the quantity of three-bedroom units, two-bedroom units, and one-bedroom units that shall be maintained as affordable. The affordable units shall be allocated to the very low, low and moderate income categories as stipulated in the Disposition and Development Agreement. 18. Recordation of Affordable Agreement. No building permit shall be issued by the City for the project until the developer has executed a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with the City of Temecula as housing successor, and the covenant/deed restrict identified in condition 18 above has been recorded with the County of Riverside Recorders Office. 19. Compliance with Mitigated Negative Declaration. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2019011003 per the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. 20. Page 3 of 20 Landscape Pre-construction Meeting. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits the start of construction, a pre-construction landscape meeting shall be held between the project manager, assigned Planner, and the City’s landscape consultant. 21. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 22. Public Art Ordinance. The developer shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 23. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 24. Density Bonus Agreement. Applicant shall enter into a density bonus agreement with the City pertaining to parking. 25. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 26. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 27. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 28. Page 4 of 20 Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 29. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find and make recommendations as to treatment.” 30. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 31. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 32. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 33. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 34. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30 -day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 35. Page 5 of 20 Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 36. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 37. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation (See PL-4). The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 38. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 39. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. 40. Page 6 of 20 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 41. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized. 42. Creek Access. The project shall obtain all necessary approvals to provide pedestrian access for residents to the Murrieta Creek Trail. 43. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 44. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 0.73 acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 10.36% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. (Applies prior to recordation of Final Map if a map is part of the project, or at Building Permit if a map is not a part of the project) 45. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 46. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 47. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 48. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 49. Page 7 of 20 Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 50. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 51. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 52. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 53. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within private common areas. 54. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: Decorative block and wrought iron combination. 55. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 56. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include Prior to the start of construction, detailed plans for outdoor areas including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc. to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 57. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 58. Page 8 of 20 Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision be installed per the approved entitlement plans; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development approval. 59. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 60. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 61. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 62. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 63. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 64. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Disposition and Development Agreement. Execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with the City of Temecula as housing successor. The DDA shall include the City owned land that is contemplated to be included as part of the Final Map Contribution to the project (APN: 922-053-021 and 922-053-048) 65. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated February 7, 2018, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 66. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated January 17, 2019, a copy of which is attached. 67. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated January 15, 2019, a copy of which is attached. 68. Page 9 of 20 Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District’s transmittal dated January 9, 2019, a copy of which is attached. 69. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 70. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 71. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 72. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 73. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; and b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 74. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 75. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 76. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. 77. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 78. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 79. Page 10 of 20 Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as Southern California Edison (SCE), RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. 80. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 81. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 82. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 83. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP 84. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 85. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 86. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 87. Page 11 of 20 Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24-hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 88. Floodplain/Floodway Development. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 89. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 90. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 91. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 92. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 93. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 94. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 95. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 96. Page 12 of 20 Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 97. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 98. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 99. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Parcel Map No. 37510 shall be approved and recorded submitted for review. 100. Western Bypass Corridor. The developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be approved by the City. 101. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans (and the construction plans for landscaped medians) shall be approved by submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, As outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard - 60' R/W) to include removal of existing curb and sidewalk, installation of rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 102. Undergrounding Wires. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements 103. Floodplain/Floodway Development. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved LOMR shall be submitted to Public Works. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 104. Page 13 of 20 Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private streetlights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public streetlights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 105. Certifications. Should the start of grading be delayed, the required certifications shall be submitted prior to scheduling the first building inspection. The certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 106. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement, including but not limited to: a. Pujol Street Improvements b. Streetlights shall be installed and operational 107. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 108. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 109. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 110. Final Map. Parcel Map 37510 shall be approved and recorded. 111. Construction of Street Improvements. Include with Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy: All street improvements shall be completed. a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard - 60' R/W) to include removal of sidewalk, installation of sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 112. Page 14 of 20 BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 113. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2016 edition of the California Building, Residential, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2016 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2016 California Energy Codes, 2016 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 114. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 115. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 116. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 117. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 118. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 119. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 120. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 121. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 122. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 123. Page 15 of 20 House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 124. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 125. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 126. At Plan Review Submittal Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2016 2019 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. 128. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 129. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. 130. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. 131. Prior to Beginning of Construction Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 132. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Page 16 of 20 Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 133. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 134. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 3,500 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi-family. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. There may be two points of connections required in order to meet the on site fire hydrant fire flow as well as the fire sprinkler demands. Number of connection points will be determined by Rancho Water and the Civil Engineer. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 135. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 136. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 137. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 138. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 139. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. A set of plans is required for each set of buildings. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 140. Page 17 of 20 Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 141. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Address Directory (Multi-Family). A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 142. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 143. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). 144. Knox Box. A “Knox -Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 145. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi-family residential shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All units shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers near or on the front doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 146. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 147. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 148. Disable Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 149. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 150. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 151. Page 18 of 20 Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 152. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 153. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 154. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 155. Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 156. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 157. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 158. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 159. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 160. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 161. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a “call-out only” feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 162. Page 19 of 20 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 163. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 164. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 165. Page 20 of 20 CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE Planning Application Number: PA22-0996 By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not limited to) any referenced documents, local state, or federal regulations, statement of operations, hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and understand them. I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions. Property Owner Printed Name _________________________ Applicant Printed Name _________________________ Property Owner Signature & Date ___________________________ Applicant Signature & Date ___________________________ Parcel Number(s): 922-053-021 922-053-047 922-053-048 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA 22-0996 Vine Creek Apartments Tentative Parcel Map: A Tentative Parcel Map application for Vine Creek Apartments that will allow three lots to be turned into one. The project is located approximately 130 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection on the east side of Pujol Street. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-053-021 922-053-047 922-053-048 Greater than 14.1 DU MSHCP Category: Residential Attached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Per WRCOG Requirements Multi-Family Attached (5 or More Units) October 19, 2022 October 19, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not Located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Four Hundred and Four Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($2,404.75) which includes the Two Thousand Three Hundred Fifty-Four Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($2,354.75) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. 1. General Requirements Page 1 of 7 Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 5 (Old Town). 5. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to the corresponding Development Agreement. 6. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within MND No. 2019011003 7. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 8. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 9. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 10. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 0.73 acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 10.36% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. (applies prior to recordation of Final Map if a map is part of the project, or at Building Permit if a map is not a part of the project) 11. Density Bonus Agreement. Applicant shall enter into a Density Bonus Agreement with the City pertaining to Parking. 12. Page 2 of 7 Disposition and Development Agreement. Execution of the Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with the City of Temecula as housing successor. The DDA shall include the City owned land that is contemplated to be included as part of the Final Map Contribution to the project (APN: 922-053-021 and 922-053-048) 13. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Parcel Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 14. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 15. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; and b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 16. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 17. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 18. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 19. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Final or Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 20. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; b. Rancho California Water District; c. Eastern Municipal Water District; d. Cable TV Franchise; e. Telephone Company; f. Southern California Edison Company; g. The Gas Company; and other affected agencies 21. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Pujol Street on the Parcel Map with the exception of two (2) openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. 22. Page 3 of 7 RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to issuance of any permit. 23. PW-009: Western Bypass Corridor. The developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be approved by the City. 24. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Pujol Street (Old Town Specific Plan Street Standard – 60’ R/W) to include removal of existing curb and sidewalk, installation of rolled curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 25. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 26. Undergrounding Wires. Move to Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 27. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 28. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 29. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a AutoCAD drawing format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 30. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Southern California Edison b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; or other affected agencies. 31. Page 4 of 7 Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 32. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 33. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 34. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 35. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 36. Floodplain/Floodway Development. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 37. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 38. Page 5 of 7 Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 39. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 40. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 41. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 42. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Parcel Map Number 37510 shall be approved and recorded submitted for review. 43. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 44. Floodplain/Floodway Development. Move to Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved LOMR shall be submitted to Public Works. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 45. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall Show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 46. Page 6 of 7 Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement, include but not limited to: a. Pujol Street Improvements b. Streetlights shall be installed and operational 47. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 48. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 49. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 50. Final Map. Parcel Map 37510 shall be approved and recorded. 51. Page 7 of 7 Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA22-0996 APPLICANT: Jarrod Short PROPOSAL: A Modification application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIRS and Negative Declarations CASE PLANNER: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: October 19, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. 1 CD229 C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@EC1C8002\@BCL@EC1C8002.DOCX City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com October 20, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application Number PA22-0996, a Modification Application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Eric Jones at email: eric.jones@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt 2 CD229 C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@EC1C8002\@BCL@EC1C8002.DOCX City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Vine Creek Revisions (PA22-0996) Description of Project: A Modification Application to allow for certain conditions of approval to be amended for a previously approved affordable residential project Project Location: Generally located approximately 100 feet north of the Main Street and Pujol Street intersection. Applicant/Proponent: Jarrod Short The Planning Commission approved the above-described project on October 19, 2022 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) Other: Section 15162 Subsequent EIRS and Negative Declarations Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: An MND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA) as part of the original project approval. The MND identified no areas where impacts were considered Significant and Unavoidable. The current modification application will allow for the utilization of external downspouts and various revisions to the previously approved Conditions of Approval. None of these revisions are anticipated to intensify impacts to the previously analyzed and adopted MND. Contact Person/Title: Eric Jones Associate Planner Telephone Number (951) 506-5115 Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: 3 CD229 C:\USERS\UFC-PROD\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECHNOLOGIES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@EC1C8002\@BCL@EC1C8002.DOCX 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: October 19, 2022 PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner APPLICANT NAME: City of Temecula PROJECT SUMMARY: Long Range Project Number LR21-0279, an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards. CEQA: Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Addendum; Section 15164 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution recommending City Council adopt a Resolution adopting an EIR Addendum and adopt a Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt a Resolution amending the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards. BACKGROUND SUMMARY On May 25, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 10-09 to approve a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). This specific plan amendment utilized form- based zoning to establish standards for building placement, building form, and building type to facilitate pedestrian friendly development, and emphasized implementation of these standards over specific land uses. While land uses are addressed in the Specific Plan, more emphasis was placed on the form-based development standards considering that specific uses will come and go over the life of the building, and if the appropriate types of buildings for a pedestrian oriented downtown were developed within Old Town, the appropriate types of land uses would also occur as a result. ANALYSIS Since the adoption of the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment, staff has had the opportunity to implement the plan on a variety of projects. These projects have ranged from simple land use determinations to complex development plan applications. Staff has also received feedback from applicants regarding their experiences working with the Specific Plan. Staff’s implementation of the plan, as well as the candid dialogue with applicants, have provided an opportunity to discover areas of the document that require amendment. Staff has identified nine amendments that will 2 allow for refinement of the document. The amendments consist of simple clerical revisions as well as land use and development standard revisions that will provide greater flexibility for the development community and staff when working with the OTSP. A discussion of each amendment is below: 1. Revise maximum building height standards for three and four-story buildings in the Downtown Core from fifty feet to fifty-five feet: Applicants have expressed concern that the new California Mechanical and Energy Codes make it difficult to fit equipment such as ducting between floors in structures that have a maximum height of fifty feet. City building inspection staff have validated this concern. The extra five feet of height proposed will allow applicants greater flexibility when designing their projects. 2. Create Raised Commercial Porch Frontage Type: The OTSP currently contains a variety of building frontage types for applicants to choose from. The addition of a Raised Commercial Front Porch Frontage Type will allow structures to incorporate a two-foot- high raised porch. This height is ideal for applicants that wish to incorporate outdoor dining space in their building design. 3. Revise commercial ground floor façade standards: The OTSP currently prohibits aluminum shop front material and spandrel panels across the bulkhead only. The bulkhead is the area of the building typically found between the finished grade and first floor shop windows. The proposed amendment will prohibit these materials across the entire ground floor façade and not just the bulkhead. 4. Revise parking structure setback standards: The OTSP currently states that parking areas (including structures) shall be placed at least twenty-feet (preferably 50-feet) behind the build-to-line. The specific plan includes a footnote stating that this requirement shall apply to all stories. The amendment will revise the specific plan to state that parking structure levels above the ground floor can be built to the build-to-line. This will increase the amount of square footage available for parking. 5. Revise architectural guidelines to clarify the need for varied rooflines and create standards for fencing in Old Town not associated with dining uses: The OTSP language will be amended to ensure building facades that exceed fifty feet incorporate varied rooflines in their design. This requirement is consistent with the City of Temecula Design Guidelines and will help create visual interest for structures. Requirements for fencing not associated with dining uses will be added. The new requirements will be consistent with the existing OTSP fencing requirements for fencing associated with dining. Chain link will be added to the list of prohibited materials. 6. Revise non-conforming use language for Neighborhood Residential and Limited Mixed-Use Zones: The OTSP currently states that single-family homes within the Neighborhood Residential Zone are not subject to Section III.G (Non-Conforming Uses and Structures). Single-family homes within the Residential/Limited Mixed Use (R/LMU) 3 zone should have also been included in this section but were not. The amendment will ensure these homes are now included. 7. Revise alley requirements to clarify utility locations: The OTSP includes provisions to ensure utility equipment is placed within an alley when one exists. The amendment will revise this language to also ensure the equipment is placed underground in an alley unless proven unfeasible by the utility provider. 8. Amend the Use Matrix to allow beer tasting, escape rooms, entertainment, and restaurant definitions. The nightclub category will be removed from the Use Matrix: The Use Matrix will be revised to include beer tasting and escape rooms. These uses will require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The amendment will also include the recently approved entertainment license as well as restaurant definitions. Nightclubs will also be removed from the Use Matrix since these uses will now be categorized under the entertainment license provisions. 9. Revise language related to Bed and Breakfast establishments: Currently, the OTSP does not require a minimum lot size or that the primary residence be the principle use of the site. The City of Temecula Municipal Code requires that Bed and Breakfast establishments be developed on a minimum lot size of sixty thousand square feet. The Code also requires that the primary residence be the principal use of the site. The City desires consistency between the OTSP and Municipal Code. The amendment will revise the language to ensure that bed and breakfast establishments in Old Town are fully consistent with the Municipal Code. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press-Enterprise on October 6, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), staff has reviewed and considered the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) for the 2010 Old Town Specific Plan Amendment certified by the City Council on May 11, 2010, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendment that will require major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendment is undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with 4 the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous Program EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendment will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Addendum No. 1 to the EIR analyzed the impact of amending the Specific Plan to allow for four- story hotels in the Downtown Core district of the Old Town Specific Plan. This amendment also added language to clarify the intended use of Minor Exceptions for building height. Addendum No. 1 to the EIR was approved by the City Council on May 26, 2020. The proposed Specific Plan Amendments to allow for revisions to certain development and land use standards has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted 2010 Program EIR, and Addendum No. 1 to the EIR, and an EIR Addendum is the appropriate CEQA action for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment pursuant to CEQA Section 15164. FINDINGS The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having “A viable, high quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically, preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and gathering places for tourists and residents.” The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies, and objectives. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City’s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards, and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 5 The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan (page LU-32), the purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. As identified within the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (page LU-30), Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist, and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula’s downtown and the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further supports its downtown character. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding area. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map 2. Draft PC Resolution – EIR Addendum 3 Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution 4 Exhibit A – EIR Addendum 5. Draft PC Resolution – Specific Plan Amendment 6 Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution 7. Exhibit A – Specific Plan Amendment (Underline/Strikeout) 8. Old Town Specific Plan Program EIR 9. EIR Addendum No. 1 10. Notice of Public Hearing 11. Draft Notice of Determination with County Clerk R A N C H O CALIFORNIARDAVE N I D AA VILASANTIAGO RD MERCEDES STSIXTH STCA LL ELUMINATI E R RAVI STARDPUJOL ST AVENIDAABRILOLD TO W N FRONT STMORENORDFIFTH STFOURTH STR A N C HOHIGHLAND D R MAIN STCORT E F R ESCA CALLENACIDOTHIRD STSECOND STF EL I XVAL DE Z A V E YNEZ RDDI AZ RDCALLE REV A FIRSTSTProj ect Sit e CITY OF TE ME CULA LR21-02 79 0 400 800200 Feet\Date Cr ea te d: 08 /1 2/2022 1:6 ,0 001 inc h = 50 0 fe et The map LR21-0279.mx d is maintained by City of Temec ula G IS. Dat a and inf ormat ion repres ent ed on this map are subject t o updat eand modific ation. T he C it y of Tem ecula as sumes no warr anty or legal r es ponsibility f or t he infor mation contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the Cit y of Temecula G I S online at ht tps://tem eculaca.gov /gis !"#$15 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2009071049)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. In May 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”). At that time, the City certified a Final Program Environmental Impact Report, State Clearing House No. 2009071049 (“EIR”), to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (”CEQA”) for approval of the Specific Plan Amendment. B. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report was adopted May 26, 2020. C. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment N. 10 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards to allow for revisions to certain development and land use standards. D. The City has caused an Addendum No. 2 (“Addendum”) to be prepared for the Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a new or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164. E. Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report, addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Specific Plan Amendment. F. An Addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to the Final EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. G. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 2 in conjunction with the Program EIR. H. On October 19, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. I. The Planning Commission has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that they are based upon substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. The documents, staff reports, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination on the City’s website at www.TemeculaCA.gov. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve the Resolution hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The City has reviewed the potential impacts of Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) and the potential benefits to the City of Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) and has concluded that Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) in the best interest of the City. B. Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) is consistent with the City’s General Plan including the goals and objectives thereof and each element thereof. Section 3. Environmental Findings. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Planning Commission, hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment: A. Some changes or additions to the Program EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred. B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendments that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendments are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previously certified Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previously certified Program EIR was adopted or Addendum No. 1 was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendments will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City Declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2009071049) for Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan per Exhibit “A” attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 2009071049) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. In May 2010, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”). At that time, the City certified a Final Program Environmental Impact Report, State Clearing House No. 2009071049 (“EIR”), to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (”CEQA”) for approval of the Specific Plan Amendment. B. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report was adopted May 26, 2020. C. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment N. 10 to the Specific Plan would update and modify those standards to allow for revisions to certain development and land use standards. D. Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report, addresses potential environmental impacts that might result from the Specific Plan Amendment. E. The City has caused an Addendum No. 2 (“Addendum”) to be prepared for the Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Specific Plan Amendment does not require the preparation of a new or Supplemental Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164. F. An Addendum need not be circulated for public review but is attached to the Final EIR in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. G. The City Council has reviewed and considered the Addendum No. 2 in conjunction with the Program EIR. H. On October 19, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report and proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific 2 Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. I. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed actions and duly considering the comments, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-___ recommending to the City Council that Addendum No 2 to the Old Town Final Program Environmental Impact Report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2022-____ recommending to the City Council that the proposed Amendment No 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved. Resolution No. 2022- ____ and Resolution No. _____ are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. J. On _____ the City Council of the City of Temecula hel d a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report and the proposed Amendment No.10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and address the City Council. K. The City Council has reviewed the findings made in this Resolution and finds that they are based upon substantial evidence that has been presented to the City Council in the record of proceedings. The documents, staff report, and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution is based are on file and available for public examination on the City’s website at www.TemeculaCA.gov. The City Council has independently reviewed and considered the contents of Addendum No. 2 prior to deciding whether to approve the Specific Plan Amendment. Section 2. Further Findings. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the City Council finds and determines that Addendum No. 2 is the appropriate environmental document to analyze the proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Specific Plan (“Amendment”) because: A. Some changes or additions to the Program EIR are necessary, but none of the conditions described in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. B. There are no substantial changes proposed by the Amendment that will require major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; C. No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Amendment are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous Program EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and D. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at t he time the previous 3 Program EIR was adopted or Addendum No. 1 was adopted, showing that: (a) the Amendment will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the Program EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the Program EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the Program EIR would substant ially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 3. The City Council hereby adopts Addendum No. 2 which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , . Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH# 2009071049) Prepared by the City of Temecula In its capacity as a Lead Agency PROJECT TITLE: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment #10 (LR21-0279) PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning Application No. LR21-0279, an amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards. Proposed amendments include: 1. Revise maximum building height standards for three and four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district from 50 feet to 55 feet; 2. Add provisions to allow for raised outdoor patios (24-inch height) for commercial structures; 3. Revise commercial ground floor façade standards to prohibit the use of aluminum shop front or spandrel panels; 4. Clarify existing parking structure setback language so that it applies to all parking structure stories; 5. Revise architectural guidelines to clarify varied roofline and fencing language; 6. Revise non-conforming use language for Residential and Limited Mixed-Use Zones so that it is consistent with existing language in the specific plan; 7. Revise alley requirements to clarify utility locations, trash service, and deliveries requirements; 8. Amend Use Matrix to allow beer tasting, escape rooms, and Entertainment Licenses; 9. Clarify existing language related to bed and breakfast establishments for consistency with the City of Temecula Municipal Code. PURPOSE: This addendum to the Environmental Impact Report is being prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 which allows for a lead agency to prepare an addendum to a previously adopted Environmental Impact Report. Specifically, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) provides that an addendum to an adopted Environmental Impact Report may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report have occurred. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared for the project unless, on a basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following is determined: 1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 (LR21-0279) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@2004E951\@BCL@2004E951.doc 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the Environmental Impact Report due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance identifies one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Environmental Impact Report. FINDINGS CONCERNING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the environmental impacts of the original project were studied in a Final Program Environmental Impact Report (“FPEIR”) (SCH# 2009071049) that was certified on May 11, 2010 and in a subsequent addenda prepared in May 26, 2020 which is now final. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan which includes: Provisions to allow for raised outdoor patios (24-inch height) for commercial structures, revise commercial ground floor façade standards to prohibit the use of aluminum shop front or spandrel panels, clarify existing parking structure setback language so that it applies to all parking structure stories, revise architectural guidelines to clarify varied roofline and fencing language, revise non-conforming use language for Residential and Limited Mixed-Use Zones so that it is consistent with existing language in the specific plan, revise alley requirements to clarify utility locations, trash service, and deliveries requirements, amend Use Matrix to allow beer tasting, escape rooms, and Entertainment Licenses, and clarify existing language related to bed and breakfast establishments do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated and no further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary with the exception of aesthetics due to increased building height. The project includes a revision to the maximum building height standards for three and four-story buildings in the Downtown Core District from 50 feet to 55 feet. An analysis of how this increase will impact aesthetics in the project area is below: AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 (LR21-0279) Addendum to Initial Environmental Study C:\Users\ufc-prod\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@2004E951\@BCL@2004E951.doc 1.a., b. According to the City of Temecula General Plan Community Design Element, the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) area is not identified has having any scenic vistas. In addition, the OTSP does not identify any scenic resources that include, but are not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a State scenic highway. Furthermore, there are no State scenic highways identified within the project area. No impacts are anticipated. 1.c., d. A height increase from 50’ to 55’ for three and four-story structures will be permitted within the Downtown Core District of the OTSP as a result of the project. This district already allows for 100’ hotel structures within the Hotel Overlay. Thus, the visual character of the district has already been analyzed with the incorporation of buildings that will be substantially taller than what is proposed. This is also true with how these 100’ buildings will generate light, glare, and impact to day and nighttime views. The project will not allow buildings that are taller than the previously analyzed 100’ height. Therefore, the project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site or its surroundings nor will it adversely impact day or nighttime views in the area beyond what has already been analyzed. By: ________________________ Title:___________________________ Date: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR21-0279)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved by the City Council on February 22, 1994 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 94-05. Amendment No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on January 23, 1996 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 96 -01. Amendment No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 13, 1997 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-06. Amendment No. 3 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on July 13, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-12. Amendment No. 4 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on October 10, 2000 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 00-11. Amendment No. 5 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on August 24, 2004 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 04-08. Amendment No. 6 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on June 13, 2006 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 06-07. Amendment No. 7 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 25, 2010 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 10-09. Amendment No. 8 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on September 5, 2017 by the adoption of Resolution No. 17.56. Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved May 26, 2020 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2020-32. The Old Town Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-9 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the “Specific Plan”. B. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report (“FPEIR”) on May 11, 2010 C. Staff initiated Long Range Project No. LR21-0279, a Specific Plan Amendment, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and development Code. D. The project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. On October 19, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report and proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. After hearing all written and oral testimony by staff and all written comments from the public on the proposed actions and duly considered the comments received, the Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 2022-____ recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2022- _____ recommending approval of Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. Resolution No. 2022- ___ and Resolution No. 2022-____ are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020, the Planning Commission, in recommending to the City Council approve Amendment No. 10 to the Specific Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having “A viable, high quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically, preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and gathering places for tourists and residents.” The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City’s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan (page LU-32), the purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. As identified within the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (page LU-30), Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist, and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula’s downtown and the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further supports its downtown character. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding area. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of October, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of October 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR21-0279) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine, and declare that: A. The Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved by the City Council on February 22, 1994, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 94-05. Amendment No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on January 23, 1996, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 96-01. Amendment No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 13, 1997, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-06. Amendment No. 3 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on July 13, 1999, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-12. Amendment No. 4 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on October 10, 2000, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 00-11. Amendment No. 5 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on August 24, 2004, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 04-08. Amendment No. 6 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on June 13, 2006, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 06-07. Amendment No. 7 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on May 25, 2010, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 10-09. Amendment No. 8 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved on September 5, 2017, by the adoption of Resolution No. 17.56. Amendment No. 9 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) was approved May 26, 2020, by the adoption of Resolution No. 2020-32. The Old Town Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-9 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the “Specific Plan”. B. The City Council of the City of Temecula certified the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report (“FPEIR”) on May 11, 2010. C. Addendum No. 1 to the Old Town Specific Plan FPEIR was adopted on May 26, 2020. D. Staff initiated Long Range Project No. LR21-0279, a Specific Plan Amendment, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and development Code. E. The project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. F. On October 19, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report and proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific 2 (SP-5) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. G. After hearing all written and oral testimony by staff and all written comments from the public on the proposed actions and duly considered the comments received, the Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 2022-____ recommending to the City Council that the Addendum No. 2 to the Old Town Specific Plan Final Program Environmental Impact report be approved. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 2022-_____ recommending to the City Council that the proposed Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) be approved. Resolution No. 2023-___ and Resolution No. 2023-____ are hereby incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment conforms to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU-26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element Goal 7 of having “A viable, high quality Old Town Temecula area that enhances the City economically, preserves historic structures, and provides civic, cultural, shopping, and meeting and gathering places for tourists and residents.” The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also complies with all applicable Development Code standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to the General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City’s General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan (page LU-32), the purpose of a Specific Plan is to 3 provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire Specific Plan area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. As identified within the City’s General Plan Land Use Element (page LU-30), Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist, and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula’s downtown and the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan further supports its downtown character. The City’s General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU-40). As such, the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan provides a means to enhance the area economically while also ensuring the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding area. Section 3. Approval of Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5). The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves that certain Amendment No. 10 to the Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. Section 4. City Manager Authorization. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to implement this Specific Plan Amendment. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , . Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049 Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 951) 694-6400 April 2020 Overview This Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Addendum has been prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) Amendment No. 9 – Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards project. It is an Addendum to the 2010 Program EIR that was prepared and certified for the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 7, and which is now final. An Initial Study Checklist and environmental analysis has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental impacts will result from the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9), in comparison to the impacts identified in the certified and final 2010 PEIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one of the following conclusions: Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR As documented in the attached Initial Study checklist, the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 does not result in any new or increased impacts as compared to the analysis in the previously certified 2010 PEIR. As such, an EIR Addendum is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 1 City of Temecula California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Initial Study / Environmental Checklist Project Title Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 - Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards Project OTSP originally adopted on February 22, 1994 (Ordinance No. 94-05) Previous Adopted Specific Plan Amendments (SPA): SPA 1 - January 23, 1996 (Ordinance No. 96-01) SPA 2 - May 13, 1997 (Ordinance No. 97-06) SPA 3 - July 13, 1999 (Ordinance No. 99-12) SPA 4 - October 10, 2000 (Ordinance No. 00-11) SPA 5 - August 24, 2004 (Ordinance No. 04-08) SPA 6 - June 13, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06-07) SPA 7 - May 25, 2010 (Ordinance No. 10-09) SPA 8 - September 5, 2017 (Resolution No.17-56) Previous CEQA Document State Clearinghouse Number SCH# 2009071049 – Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 Program EIR – Certified February 2010 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 Contact Person and Phone Number Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner 951) 506-5159 Project Location/History Project Location The Project area is located in the southwest portion of the City of Temecula, which is located within the County of Riverside approximately 85 miles southeast of Los Angeles, 60 miles northeast of San Diego, and 25 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1). The Project site is located within the Old Town area of the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15 (I-15), south of Rancho California Road, east of Pujol Street and generally north of First Street/Santiago Road (Figure 2). The overall OTSP and the Downtown Core Zoning District and Downtown Core Hotel Overlay zone is shown in Figure 3. Project History Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989. On November 9, 1993, Temecula adopted the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan. Since then, 14 specific plans have been adopted to govern defined geographic regions of the City. The Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) was prepared in 1992 and 1993 under the direction of a City Council -appointed steering committee. The Steering Committee members represented a wide range of local business and resident interests. The OTSP was adopted by the City Council on February 8, 2 1994. The original purpose of the document was to provide a comprehensive plan for land use, development regulations, design guidelines, vehicular circulation, parking, development incentives and other related actions aimed at implementing the goals and objectives set forth in the document itself. The Specific Plan for Old Town was adopted on February 22, 1994. Between 1994 and 2006, six amendments were made to the Specific Plan, primarily with regard to building height standards, requirements for outdoor vendors, sign regulations, land uses, parking standards, historic preservation zoning and standards, and setback and landscape standards. On May 25, 2010, the City Council adopted the seventh amendment to the OTSP, which was a comprehensive revision to the entire Old Town Specific Plan, and a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. The eighth amendment to the OTSP relocated a portion of the Downtown Core Hotel Overlay zone. The OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 was adopted May 25, 2010 and a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified May 11, 2010). The primary purpose of the OTSP SPA No. 7 was to incorporate form-based code principles into the Specific Plan to more clearly define development regulations, to better facilitate pedestrian friendly development through building placement and streetscapes, and to encourage mixed-use development within Old Town. The Specific Plan Amendment was intended to achieve these goals through changes to site planning standards and guidelines, streetscape standards and guidelines, land use district locations and titles, architectural standards and guidelines, parking lot guidelines, public art guidelines, paving material guidelines, outdoor dining/sidewalk furniture guidelines, sign regulations and guidelines, alley guidelines, and landscape guidelines within the Specific Plan. SPA No. 7 also resulted in the annexation of approximately 2.4 acres into the Specific Plan at a location south of First Street, along the west side of Old Town Front Street, and the removal of approximately 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the intersection of 6th Street and Pujol Street. The proposed project site has also been evaluated in previous planning documents including: Old Town Specific Plan, Originally Adopted February 22, 1994 (Revised January 23, 1996, May 13, 1997, July 13, 1999, October 10, 2000, August 24, 2004, June 13, 2006, May 25, 2010, and September 5, 2017). City of Temecula General Plan EIR, prepared by The Planning Center, updated 2005. Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2009072049) – Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 (Certified May 11, 2010) Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 – Adopted May 25, 2010 3 Truax Hotel/Hotel Overlay Zone Boundary Modification EIR (SCH 2017011029), adopted September 2017 2010 Program EIR Summary The Program EIR evaluated the effect of SPA No. 7 on the following environmental factors: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Global Warming/Climate Change, Cultural Resources, Hydrology, Land Use & Planning, Noise, Utilities and Public Services and Traffic and Transportation. Project related temporary impacts to air quality, global warming/climate change and noise were determined to be significant and unavoidable, with the remaining issue areas (Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Land Use and Planning, Utilities and Public Services and Traffic and Transportation) determined to be less than significant. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the significant and unavoidable impacts. The Program EIR and findings are available for review at the City of Temecula. The Program EIR evaluated impacts associated with the following OTSP SPA 7 project description: Commercial: 1,043,928 Square Feet Hotel: 499 Rooms Residential (MF): 2,377 Units Residential (SF): 31 Units Civic: 159,809 Square Feet Office: 835,494 Square Feet The Program EIR project description included the following discussion of the Downtown Core District: Downtown Core District The Downtown Core District located along the east edge of the Open Space corridor, which contains Murrieta Creek, is intended to provide for uses that will support pedestrian-oriented and mixed-use development. This district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories that are intended to accommodate art galleries, museums, restaurants and small-scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops, or similar retail uses, offices and service-oriented uses. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core, but residential and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or office use (with parking). Cumulative projects included in the Program EIR impact evaluation included the Springhill Suites and Crown Plaza hotel projects 4 Project Sponsor’s Name and Address City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 General Plan Designation Specific Plan Implementation - Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5) – Downtown Core District Zoning SP-5 Description of Project Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 is proposed to modify the requirements in the Specific Plan for multi-story buildings within the Downtown Core Zoning District to allow four story hotels. Currently, the existing Specific Plan (Section IV.B.2.a) requires four story buildings to provide at least one floor of residential or one floor of office use with parking. The Downtown Core Hotel Overlay Zone, located within the Downtown Core zoning designation, does not require residential or office to be included in hotels. The existing OTSP allows for up to 499 Hotel Rooms within the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts, based on a market study that supported the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment and Program EIR. Of those 499 allowable hotel rooms, 343 hotel rooms have already either been constructed or approved, leaving a balance of 156 hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program EIR. Projects that exceed 499 total hotel rooms will be required to prepare additional CEQA documentation. SPA No. 9 also proposes to add footnotes to Table IV-8 (Allowable Building Types and Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District), Table IV-17 (Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District), and Table IV-28 (Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood Residential District) of the Specific Plan to state that “Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the building consistent with its architectural style analysis. A Minor Exception is not intended to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building or to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or more stories.” Because the Minor Exception is already available for development in Old Town and the footnote proposed above is intended to clarify the intended use of the Minor Exception and will not allow for anything different or greater than what is currently allowed, no further discussion of this proposed addition to the Specific Plan will occur in this Addendum. Section IV.B.2.a in the Specific Plan (Land Use and Urban Development Standards/Old Town Zoning Districts/Downtown Core (DTC) currently reads as follows: 5 The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed-use development. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office with parking) is provided). The Downtown Core is intended to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment-oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses, offices and service-oriented uses. Residential development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and mixed-use developments are also anticipated within this district. Service and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but are also restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor of office with on-site parking.” The proposed language for Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would revise Section IV.B. 2.a (Old Town Zoning Districts / Downtown Core (DTC) to read as follows: The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed-use development. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided; when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided, or when four floors of hotel are provided). The Downtown Core is intended to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment-oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses, offices and service- oriented uses. Residential development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and mixed-use developments are also anticipated within this district. Service uses identified in Table IV-1 and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but are also restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use, one floor of office with onsite parking; or four stories of hotel uses.” The footnote (P4) in Table IV-1 (Land Use Matrix) for hotel uses in the Downtown Core/Downtown Core-Hotel Overlay District will reference the above revised language. The above amended OTSP Downtown Core District text still allows for a maximum of 499 hotel rooms within the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts. This EIR Addendum will focus the environmental analysis on any changes in environmental impacts that would result from allowing four story hotels in addition to the Downtown Core Zoning 6 Appendix A: Traffic Memo District’s current allowance for 4-story buildings if one floor of residential or office (with parking) is provided in multi-story buildings. Four story hotel buildings may result in additional or fewer actual hotel projects, although the number of hotel rooms will not change from 499 as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. No specific hotel projects are proposed as part of this Specific Plan Amendment. Additional CEQA documentation will be required for future hotel project applications in the OTSP if they exceed the 499 total hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program EIR for the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed- Use Districts. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The following describes each land use surrounding the Project Site: North – The Specific Plan Area is bordered immediately to the north by Rancho California Road, which provides direct access to Interstate 15 (1- 15), central Temecula and the unincorporated De Luz area. Commercial and Business Park land uses are located north of the Specific Plan area. West – The Specific Plan area is bordered immediately to the west by the escarpment hillside and the Altair Specific Plan. South – The Project Site is generally bordered to the south by First Street/Santiago Road. The area south of First Street includes commercial and open space land uses. East – The Project Site is bordered immediately to the east by Interstate 15 I-15). Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required The Project is anticipated to require the following review and approvals: Agency Action City of Temecula • Approval of Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 Adoption of EIR Addendum 7 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected This Initial Study Checklist has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental impacts will result with adoption of the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9) in comparison to the impacts identified in the 2010 Certified Program EIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one of the following conclusions: Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR It is noted that the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Initial Study Checklist was updated in 2019 to modify some of the checklist questions and add additional checklist topical areas. The Initial Study checklist used to scope the content of the 2010 Program EIR was the pre-2019 version and does not entirely match the 2019 updated checklist used in this Addendum. Checklist questions contained in the previous checklist that are not included in the 2019 update, are not evaluated herein. Only those environmental factors evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR are reevaluated in this EIR Addendum checklist, with the exception of Tribal Cultural Resources, which was added to the Initial Study Checklist in 2019. Environmental factors not previously evaluated (except Tribal Cultural Resources) in the 2010 Program EIR are not evaluated herein to ensure consistency between the Program EIR and the EIR Addendum. Specific Plan Amendment 9 proposes to amend hotel-related land use policy within the Downtown Core District. No specific development proposals or locations have been proposed, and future development applications will be subject to further CEQA environmental review at the time that they are submitted. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population/Housing Biological Resources Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation Energy Transportation Geology/Soils Tribal Cultural Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Utilities/Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Wildfire Hydrology/Water Quality Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use/Planning Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise were found to be significant and unavoidable in the 2010 OTSP SPA No. 7 Program EIR. They remain so, within the context of the EIR Addendum, but no increases in these impacts occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 8 Determination To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) project impacts have been determined to be the same or less than identified in the earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM will be prepared and, nothing further is required. Signature Date City of Temecula Printed Name For 9 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 10 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 11 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 12 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan, and evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, aesthetic impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 1.a. Same Impact. Scenic vistas are views defined as having a valued resource and typically contain scenes such as waterways, the ocean, hills, valleys, or mountains. The City of Temecula contains several scenic vistas which include the hills surrounding the City of Temecula and Santa Ana Mountains to the west and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, the slopes in the Sphere of Influence located west and east of the City limits and other important landforms and historic landscape features as scenic vistas. The rolling hills surrounding the City of Temecula to the south east, and west are designated by the General Plan Community Design Element as important natural features whose public views should be protected and maintained. Therefore, all public and private development projects are subject to review by the City to ensure consistency with the General Plan Community Design Element to maintain public views of scenic resources. A portion of the I-15 from Corona South to the San Diego County line has been named as an Eligible State Scenic Highway. At this time, this area of the I-15 has been designated but is not yet considered a State Scenic Highway (Caltrans, 2016). The Project area is highly urbanized and exhibits relatively flat terrain. Views of the surrounding area, specifically of the Santa Ana Mountains, would not be substantially obstructed or impacted by Project implementation due to the similar elevation of the Project area compared to the surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the Project is required to comply with the General Plan Community Design Element and is subject to review by the City for consistency. Therefore, development within the Project area would result in less than significant impacts related to scenic vistas and the effects would be less than significant. 13 1.b. Same Impact. The Project Site, nearby roadways, and surrounding land are not considered a state scenic highway corridor. Within Riverside County the closest designated State Scenic Highways in Riverside County are along State Route 74 (SR-74) and State Route 243 (SR-243). The area designated as a State Scenic Highway is not visible from the Project Site or the surrounding area and is located approximately 50 miles northeast of the Project Site. The Project is located adjacent to the I-15, which is designated by Caltrans as an Eligible State Scenic Highway; however, it is not officially designated as a State Scenic Highway by Caltrans. Public views of the distant mountains (Cleveland National Forest) to the south from I- 15 would not be obscured by development of the Project. Under the Project, public views of the project area would change from a vacant land to a built environment with multiple story buildings. However, the proposed Project is consistent with surrounding residential and commercial uses. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts would occur to passenger views along the I-15 and impacts would be less than significant. 1.c. Same Impact. The Project area is currently developed with urban uses. The Project would modify the existing visual character and quality of the area through the addition of up to four (4) story hotels; however, the proposed hotel uses are located with an urban area and are consistent and visually compatible with the uses located in the vicinity of the project area. Additionally, four story buildings are a Permitted Use in the OTSP Downtown Core District (when at least one floor of residential or one floor of office (with parking) is provided) and are consistent with the City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance. Because the visual character would be similar to the surrounding land uses and is a permitted use under the OTSP and current zoning, the Project is consistent with surrounding land uses and would have a less than significant impact on the visual character of the area. 1.d. Same Impact. The Project Site is located within a developed and urban area within the City of Temecula. New sources of exterior lighting and interior lighting would be included as part of the Project and be subject to light pollution regulations in Chapter 17.22 Section 17.22.176 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, the County of Riverside’s Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance, and the City of Temecula General Plan Policy 2.5 of the Community Design Elements. Lighting would be downward shielded and dark sky compliant to minimize lighting and glare. Daytime glare is attributed to the reflection of artificial and natural lighting off of highly reflective surfaces, such as windows. Mid-rise buildings with large surface areas of reflective or mirrorlike materials are a common source of daytime glare, especially around sunrise and sunset. In addition to 4-story buildings with a minimum of one floor of residential or one floor of office (with parking), the proposed Project allows for up to four (4) story hotels which would be built with textured, non-reflective surfaces, non-reflective (mirrored) glass and downward shielded lighting to minimize glare and prevent spillover onto adjacent structures. As a result, the Project would result in a less than significant glare impact. References: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System. 14 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to initial Study location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Comments: 2.a-e. Agricultural and Forest Resources impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 15 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? X c Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X d Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential-Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, air quality impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 3.a. Same Impact. The 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) serves as South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) state implementation plan (SIP) submittal to California Air Resources Board (CARB) to track the path towards the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) reaching attainment under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The Project area is designated as OTSP Downtown Core District. The Project is a Permitted Use of the Downtown Core District and the City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance and would therefore be consistent with existing general plan land use designations. Emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 computer program (CAPCOA 2016). Detailed information regarding modeling assumptions and outputs can be found in Appendix A. Project construction would generate exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicle trips, fugitive dust from demolition and ground disturbing activities, and off-gas emissions from architectural coatings and paving. Operation of the Project would increase the amount of operational air emissions from vehicles accessing the project site (mobile sources), natural gas consumption (energy sources), and use of consumer products and operation of landscaping equipment (area sources). However, as discussed below, construction and operation of the project would not result in daily emissions in exceedance of the SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance for emissions of ROG, NO X , PM 10 , and PM2.5 . As discussed above, the SCAB is in nonattainment for several of the NAAQS (ozone and PM2.5 ) and CAAQS (ozone, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 ). Because emissions of ROG, NO X , PM 2.5 , and PM 10 would not exceed these thresholds, construction- and operation- related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors would not conflict with an applicable AQMP. This impact would be less than significant. 16 3.b. Same Impact. As discussed above, construction of the Project would generate criteria pollutants and precursor emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment, worker commute trips, and fugitive dust emissions. The Project would generate emissions associated with typical activities associated with congregate car including mobile source emissions from worker commute trips, persons visiting residents of the Project areas, and residents’ use of vehicles. Natural gas would also be directly consumed on-site from natural gas–powered stove tops and fireplaces as well as indirectly consumed to produce energy to power the Project. The infrequent application of paint, use of consumer products and landscaping equipment, and application of fertilizers on landscaped areas would also result in operational emissions of air pollutants. Thus, construction- and operation-related emissions of ROG, NOX , PM 2.5 , and PM 10 would remain significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no greater impacts would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 3.c. Same Impact. Implementation of the Project would not introduce any new long-term operational sources of TACs. Therefore, construction related TACs will comprise the analysis of substantial pollutant concentrations. In relation to air quality, sensitive receptors include infants and children, the elderly, people with illnesses, or others who are especially sensitive to the adverse health effects of air pollutants (discussed previously). Hospitals, schools, convalescent facilities, and residential housing are examples of land uses with populations who are sensitive to air quality impacts. Existing sensitive receptors within the Project Site include residences to the north, south, east, and west and the ABC Child Care Center to the northeast of the Project Site. Construction-related activities would result in temporary, intermittent emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) from the exhaust of heavy-duty off-road diesel equipment used for construction of the Project. On-road, diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the project site during construction to deliver materials and equipment would not operate at a single location for extended periods and therefore would not expose a single receptor to excessive diesel PM emissions. This analysis focuses primarily on heavy duty construction equipment used on-site that may affect nearby off- site land uses. Considering the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, the relatively low mass of diesel PM emissions that would be generated during project construction, the relatively short period during which diesel PM-emitting construction activity would take place in the same location near the same receptors, it is anticipated construction-related TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to an incremental increase in cancer risk that exceeds 10 in one million or a hazard index of 1.0 or greater. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no greater impacts would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 3.d. Same Impact. Odors are typically associated with industrial activities involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes. Odors are also associated with such uses as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided and would not change the types of uses allowed within the overall specific plan area. The Project would not introduce any major odor-producing uses that would have the potential to affect a substantial number of people. It is expected refuse generated from future development of the Project would be temporarily stored in covered containers and would be removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations. Activities and materials associated with construction would be typical of construction projects of similar type and size. Any odors that may be generated during construction of future development of the Project would be localized and would not be sufficient to affect a substantial number of people or result in a nuisance as defined by SCAQMD Rule 402. Impacts with regard to odors would be less than significant. 17 References: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2019. Area Designations Maps – State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019. CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019. 18 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery Sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a – f. Biological Resources were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 19 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? X c Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects submitted for development review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources are identified, and to ensure that appropriate conditions of approval are applied. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 5.a. Same Impact. A historical resource is defined in Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as any object, building, structure, Site, area, place, record, or manuscript determined to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. Historical resources are further defined as being associated with significant events, important persons, or distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; representing the work of an important creative individual; possessing high artistic values; or yielding information important in prehistory or history. Resources listed in or determined eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register, or identified as significant in a historic resource survey are also considered historical resources under CEQA. Future project construction consistent with SPA 9 would require grading and excavation in areas which could contain previously recorded historic resources. Additional CEQA analysis and documentation will be required when specific projects are proposed. Less than significant impact with prior mitigation incorporated. 5.b. Same Impact. Section 15064.5(a)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines generally defines archaeological resources as any resource that “has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.” Archaeological resources are features, such as tools, utensils, carvings, fabric, building foundations, etc., that document evidence of past human endeavors and that may be historically or culturally important to a significant earlier community. The City of Temecula consulted on April 21, 2020 with the Pechanga Tribe to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga Tribe identified the Old Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural 20 Property, 'éxva Teméeku. In addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources during ground disturbing activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. The following refinements to the 2010 PEIR mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new information. The mitigation measure refinements are as follows: Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project-specific basis prior to the City’s approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground- disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources, and/or re-burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning 21 Commission and/or City Council. Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: o Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV 22 Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report. Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. In addition, Tribal Cultural Resources are defined in the CEQA statute and Guidelines as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in a local register of historical resources, or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant. A cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources, unique archaeological resources, or non-unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet these criteria. Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources are evaluated in Section 18 of this Initial Study Checklist. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development review to the City of Temecula will be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources are identified, and where required, are mitigated. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan 23 Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. Less than significant impact with prior mitigation incorporated. 5.c. Same Impact. The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City. Project construction would require ground disturbing activities included grading and excavation in a previously undeveloped area. Although no known human remains exist onsite there is a potential that ground disturbing activates could disturb previously unknown human remains. Therefore, impacts to human remains would remain less than significant with implementation of the previously adopted mitigation measures. References: City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-2, Historic Structures and Sites, page OS-16. 24 6. ENERGY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? X b Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X Comments: 6.a-b. Energy Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 which does not change the types of uses allowed in the overall Old Town Specific Plan area. 25 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv. Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-Site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X f Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or Site or unique geologic feature? X Comments: 7.a-f. Geology and Soils Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area, including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of the current OTSP area. 26 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, greenhouse gas emission impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 8.a. Same Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would increase GHG emissions which have the potential to cumulatively result in a significant impact on the environment. Construction-related activities that would generate GHG emissions include operation of heavy-duty equipment and work commute vehicle trips to and from the Project site. Operation of the Project would result in GHG emissions from vehicle trips accessing the Project site (mobile sector), electricity and natural gas combustion (energy sector), operation of landscaping equipment (area sector), treatment of water and wastewater (water sector), and decomposition of solid wastes at landfills (solid waste sector). Emissions from these sectors and from construction-related activities were modeled using CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. For the reason stated above, construction and operation of the Project would result in a significant climate change impact. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 8.b. Same Impact. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may conflict with applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions, as discussed in CARB’s 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017 Scoping Plan), Southern California Association of Government’s SCAG’s) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and the City of Temecula’s Sustainability Plan. The Project’s location in proximity to commercial and other residential uses and its proximity to transit service renders the project consistent with and in support of the goals and benefits of the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS, which seeks “improved mobility and accessibility… to reach desired destinations with relative ease and within a reasonable time, using reasonably available transportation choices.” The project would support the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS implementation of “strategies focused on compact infill development, superior placemaking (the process of creating public spaces that are appealing), and expanded housing and transportation choices.” As such, the project would be consistent with regional plans to reduce VMT and associated GHG emissions. City of Temecula Sustainability Plan The City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to identify and address current and future climate change goals. The Sustainability Plan includes several goals for reducing GHG emissions through energy and water 27 efficiency, waste reduction, and embracing cleaner technology. The Project would be consistent with the applicable sustainability goals outlined in the plan. The Sustainability Plan incorporates the following goals which would be applicable to the Project: Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs that support this goal. Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs. Reduce total waste generated and reduce the use and release of household hazardous waste. Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). The Project would minimize energy consumption through the use on energy metering and would support the use of clean energy through meeting the Tier 1 Standards of the CalGreen Code. Energy consumption would additionally be reduced through compliance with the 2019 California Energy Code, which achieved a 53 percent reduction in residential energy use as compared to the 2016 California Energy Code through solar photovoltaic installation requirements. Furthermore, as discussed above, the project would be located close to existing public transit and would encourage multi- modal transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). The project’s consistency with these goals along with the 2017 Scoping Plan and SCAG RTP/SCS would ensure that the project would not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or regulations for reducing the emission of GHGs. As such the Project would not conflict with any applicable plans or policies and impacts would be less than significant. References: California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main- presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. 28 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a Site which is included on a list of hazardous materials Sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? X f Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X g Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? X Comments: 9.a-g. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area, including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of the current OTSP area. 29 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? X b Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of imperious surfaces, in a manner which would: X i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; X ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; X iii) create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or X iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X d In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk or release of pollutants due to project inundation? X e Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and Evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 10.a. Same Impact. The Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and is required to comply with the development planning requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) MS4 permit and the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance. As shown in Figure 3, the proposed Project design implements non-structural, structural, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs), which can include infiltration basin, detention basin, vegetated swale, media filter, pervious concrete, storm drain stenciling or signage, protection of material and trash storage areas from rainfall, and vector avoidance strategies. The proposed Project Site drainage would 30 implement the following BMPs in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan: capture and convey stormwater runoff from developed areas to underground retention/detention stormwater water quality mitigation system via private storm drain inlets and drainage networks. Development of the Project is required to comply with all water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. By complying with the requirements for a Priority Development Project impacts related to violation of water quality standards and waste discharge requirements of the Project are anticipated to be less than significant. 10.b. Same Impact. Water would be supplied to the Project by the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The Project would slightly increase the demand for water from the RCWD. The RCWD currently obtains water from the following primary water sources: 1) local groundwater from the Murrieta-Temecula Groundwater Basin; 2) imported State Water Project (SWP) and Colorado River water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) through the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD); and 3) recycled water from both the District and EMWD facilities. The Water Facilities Master Plan predicts an additional annual groundwater capacity which will be generated through increasing artificial recharge of the groundwater basin by 22,443 acres feet per year (AFY). An additional annual supply of 5,319 AFY of recycled water is also anticipated by buildout. The full build-out annual capacity of the EWMD is anticipated to be 115,002 AFY which is greater than the projected build-out annual production requirement of 110,714 AFY. The proposed Project is considered as part of the full build-out area, and therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply for the EMWD and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. As discussed in response 10.a. the Project is designed to promote stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Therefore, Project impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.i. Same Impact. The proposed Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and therefore the Project area is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Additionally, future Project design is required to comply with the local City of Temecula Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance (Chapter 8.28 et seq.) and regional MS4 Permit (California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100) requirements for stormwater management; as well as the requirements of the City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual (Chapter 18) and the City of Temecula Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (Chapter 18.18 et seq.) Potential erosion, siltation, and increased runoff would be minimized through implementation of the WQMP and adherence to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). With implementation of erosion and sediment control BMPs, construction would result in a less than significant erosion, siltation, and runoff impact. 10.c.ii. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone. The Project is required to implement a SWPPP during construction to reduce pollutants and stormwater runoff. Compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements minimize potential impacts related to flooding. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. Construction within the Project Site would be required to comply with the development planning requirements of the SDRWQCB MS4 permit and the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance. Future projects would be required to generate a project specific WQMP as required by the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance and as specified in the City’s Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan. The implementation of the specific drainage features within each WQMP, would ensure that the Project would meet the City’s MS4 Permit and Stormwater Ordinance requirements. As a part of the WQMP, the Project would be required to incorporate and maintain LID BMPs into the project design, which include measures to reduce increases in runoff through hydromodification and infiltration protection. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 10.c.iv. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone. Therefore, development of the Project area would not result in impacts related to impeding or redirecting flood flows. The Project would have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary. 31 10.d. Same Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a body of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin, such as a reservoir, harbor, lake, or storage tank. A tsunami is a great sea wave, commonly referred to as a tidal wave, produced by a significant undersea disturbance such as tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with large, shallow earthquakes. Mudflows result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone or within a dam inundation area. The Project Site is not subject to tsunami hazards given its distance to the Pacific Ocean. Furthermore, the gently sloping topography of the project area is not conducive to sustaining mudflows. The Project would have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary. 10.e. Same Impact. Future projects shall be designed to not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Future projects would be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. The Project would be required to implement a SWPPP during construction that includes BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from the Project Site. By complying with the NPDES requirements, potential impacts to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan are anticipated to be less than significant. No further analysis of this topic is required. References: City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, page PS-11. 32 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Physically divide an established community? X b Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, land use and planning impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 11.a. Same Impact. The Specific Plan Amendment would not divide and established community and would result in the same number of hotel rooms (499) as the existing Specific Plan. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi- story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided) or when four floors of hotel are provided. No changes to the existing General Plan land use designations would be made and the Project is consistent with surrounding residential and commercial land uses. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. 11.b. Same Impact. As discussed under Response 11.a., the proposed project would not change the existing General Plan land use designations or other policy or regulation, other than revising the Specific Plan to indicate that in the Downtown Core Zoning district four story hotels will be permitted in addition to buildings currently permitted of up to four stories when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided. As a result, land use and planning impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the current City General Plan and City Zoning. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and environmental impact. Project impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 33 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery Site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? X Comments: 12.a-b. Mineral Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 34 13. NOISE. Would the project result in the: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, noise impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. Comments: 13.a. Same Impact. Noise is defined as unwanted sound; however, not all unwanted sound rises to the level of a potentially significant noise impact. To differentiate unwanted sound from potentially significant noise impacts, the City has established noise regulations that consider noise-sensitive land uses. The following discussion includes a brief description of the fundamental principles of noise and commonly used noise descriptors, a summary of applicable noise standards, and an evaluation of project-generated construction and operational noise. NOISE PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTORS Audible sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured in units of decibels on a logarithmic scale. The “pitch” (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured in hertz. Most common environmental sounds are composed of a composite of frequencies. The time-varying characteristic of environmental noise over specified periods of time is described using statistical noise descriptors in terms of a single numerical value, expressed as A-weighted decibels (dbA). The noise descriptors used in this analysis are summarized below: L eq : The L eq , or equivalent sound level, is used to describe the noise level over a specified period of time, typically 1- hour, expressed as Leq . The L eq may also be referred to as the “average” sound level. 35 Lmax : The maximum, instantaneous noise level. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level is the average noise level over a 24-hour day that includes an addition of 5 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and an addition of 10 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours, respectively. CITY OF TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE The Municipal Code Title 8 Chapter 9.20,” Noise,” declares that the making, creating, or continuance of excessive noises are detrimental to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, and prosperity of the residents of the City. Section 9.20.060 establishes sound level limits. The exterior noise limits for each land use classification are summarized in Table 13-1. One-hour average sound levels are not to exceed the applicable limit. The noise subject to these limits is defined as that part of the total noise at the specified location that is due solely to the action of said person. Per the Municipal Code Section 9.20.060.D, construction noise levels measured at or beyond the property lines of any property zoned residential shall not exceed an average sound level greater than 65 dBA. Further, construction activity may only occur between 7:00 a.m. through 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction activities on Saturday are limited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. No construction activity shall be undertaken on Sunday and national recognized holidays unless exempted by Section 9.20.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Table 13-1 City of Temecula Land Use/Noise Standards Property Receiving Noise Maximum Noise Level (CNEL, dBA) Type of Land Use Land Use Designation Interior Exterior1 Residential Hillside, Rural, Very Low Density, Low Density, Low-Medium Density 45 65 Medium Density 45 65/702 High Density 45 702 Commercial and Office Neighborhood, Community, Highway Tourist, Service N/A 70 Professional Office 50 70 Light Industrial Industrial Park 55 75 Public/Institutional School 50 65 All Others 50 70 Open Space Vineyards/Agricultural N/A 70 Open Space N/A 70/653 Notes: CNEL = community noise equivalent level, dB = decibel, CNEL = community-noise equivalent level 1 Regarding aircraft-related noise, the maximum acceptable exposure for new residential development is 60 dBA CNEL. 2 Maximum exterior noise levels up to 70 dBA CNEL are allowed for Multiple-Family Housing. 3 Where quiet is a basis required for the land use. Source: City of Temecula 2005 CONSTRUCTION Construction hours are proposed to be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. No demolition would occur. Noise from construction activities would be generated by the operation of vehicles and equipment involved 36 during various stages of construction: site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and paving. The noise levels generated by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type and number of equipment, the specific model (horsepower rating), the construction activities being performed, and the maintenance condition of the equipment. The closest receptors to the project site are approximately 100 feet from the construction site. The City of Temecula has established a construction-noise significance threshold of 65 dB Leq at a site supporting a sensitive receptor. It is foreseeable that construction activities could introduce new levels of noise; however, the extent of construction equipment required to construct the proposed project would be minor due to the size of the project. Moreover, the proposed project would be constructed over a relatively short period (14 months) and would generate low construction- related Average Daily Trips (ADT). Project construction would also be required to adhere to Section 9.20.060.D of the City’s municipal code which stipulates that construction activity must be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction noise impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as documented in the 2010 Program EIR; the current SPA 9 proposal would not increase these impacts. OPERATION The existing noise environment in the project vicinity is dominated by traffic noise from nearby roadways, as well as nearby commercial activities. Long-term operations of the proposed project would have a minimal effect on the noise environment within the proximity of the project area. Noise generated by the proposed project would result primarily from the increased traffic on local roads. As a result, project-related traffic noise impacts would remain less than significant. 13.b. Same Impact. The proposed project would not result in any major operational sources of vibration (e.g., rail lines, transit stations), and therefore, this discussion focusses on short-term construction-generated vibration. Prior to the analysis, a brief discussion of vibration principles is included. FOUNDATIONS OF VIBRATION Vibration can be interpreted as energy transmitted in waves through the ground or man-made structures, which generally dissipate with distance from the vibration source. Because energy is lost during the transfer of energy from one particle to another, vibration becomes less perceptible with increasing distance from the source. Vibration sources include the use of heavy-duty equipment during construction. Operational sources include major transit (e.g., rail, transit stations) development. Maintenance operations and traffic traveling on roadways can also be a source of such vibration. If its amplitudes are high enough, ground vibration has the potential to damage structures, cause cosmetic damage or disrupt the operation of vibration-sensitive equipment such as electron microscopes and advanced technology production and research equipment. Ground vibration and ground-borne noise can also be a source of annoyance to individuals who live or work close to vibration-generating activities. Future projects consistent with SPA 9 will require additional CEQA documentation and analysis at the time applications are submitted. Vibration associated with hotel construction allowed by the Specific Plan is expected to be minor, as pile driving is not typically required Thus, impacts associated with construction-related ground vibration and vibration noise would remain less than significant. 13.c. Same Impact. According to Figure LU-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The French Valley Airport located at 37600 Sky Canyon Drive, Murrieta, is approximately 4.6 miles northeast of the Project Site. No further analysis of this topic in the Initial Study is required. Thus, impacts associated with airport related noise would remain less than significant. 37 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: Population and Housing Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 38 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, public service impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 15.a. Same Impact. Fire protection and emergency medical services are provided to the City and the Project Site by the Temecula Fire Department (FD), who contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth nor would it result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula FD services and facilities which would require new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Additionally, the future projects would be required to pay the Fire Development Impact Fee at the time of building permit. The Project would have a less than significant impact. 15.b. Same Impact. Police services for the City and the Project Site are provided by the City of Temecula Police Department PD), who contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff Department (RCSD). The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula PD services and facilities which could result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. No further analysis of this topic is required. The Project would have a less than significant impact. 15.c. Same Impact. The Project Site falls under the jurisdiction of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Project development would not generate school-aged children and thus would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. The Project would have a less than significant impact on schools. 39 15.d. Same Impact. Project implementation would ultimately introduce hotel occupants and temporary construction workers into the Downtown Core District. This population increase is considered temporary and could possibly increase short term demand on park services and facilities which is not expected to result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on parks. 15.e. Same Impact. The Project Site is currently served by the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, 3.5 miles away at 30600 Pauba Road. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on library services so that there was a need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on library resources. 40 16. RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 16a-b. Recreation Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 41 17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? X b Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X c Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X d Result in inadequate emergency access? X Comments: A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) memorandum has been prepared for the SPA by Fehr & Peers, and is included in Appendix A of this EIR Addendum. Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi- story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, transportation/traffic impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 17.a. Same Impact. Project-related construction activities have the potential to result in short-term, temporary impacts to surrounding roadways as a result of construction vehicles and worker vehicle trips, which may cause temporary traffic slowdown or partial road closures. There are no conflicts with a program, pan ordinance or other policy document. Therefore, since these impacts are temporary and short-term, the Project’s impacts would be less than significant. 17.b. Same Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Generally, vehicle miles traveled (or “VMT”) is identified as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. For the purposes of this CEQA section, “vehicle miles traveled” refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Lead agencies are required to approve a VMT significance threshold by July 1, 2020. Because the City of Temecula does not have an approved VMT significance threshold at this time, a VMT evaluation will not be conducted for the Project and it has been determined by the City that a level of service (LOS) evaluation is not required due to the limited changes proposed as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9, which does not change the overall number of hotel rooms that were previously analyzed in the certified Program EIR. The proposed allowance of hotel use in lieu of either residential or hotel use on the fourth floor, assuming an averaged rate in the Downtown Core could potentially add approximately 10.81 more trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area, including 0.27 more AM peak hour trips and 0.52 more PM peak hour trips per KSF. The trip rates are considered conservative. The conversion of the hotel trip rate to square feet/room does not factor in the hotel common space areas, such as the lobby and conference rooms, as is typically factored into published trip generation rates. Factoring in the common space areas would reduce the converted trip rate for hotel use. 42 Although Level of Service (LOS) analysis is no longer required by CEQA effective July 1, 2020, it was the applicable traffic impact analysis methodology in place when the 2010 Program EIR was certified. The Old Town Specific Plan states than an intersection specific level of service (LOS) E and F will be deemed acceptable along Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road (north loop)”, which is within the Downtown Core. Therefore, the proposed change in land use is not forecast to result in a significant traffic impact. The comparison showed that replacing residential or office use (based on an average rate) with hotel use may result in an additional 10.81 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area. This minor increase in trip generation would not substantially increase traffic or exceed significance thresholds in the OTSP. The Program EIR did not quantify the potential development of the OTSP policy that states “All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor of office with on- site parking”. Additionally, the number of hotel rooms within the Downtown Core is restricted to 499 rooms. Future development that proposes hotel use that exceeds what is covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR will require further CEQA environmental analysis regardless of how many stories are proposed. Since the height of the hotel projects does not change the cap of 499 rooms, the hotel use-related traffic that will be allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment was adequately covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR, and would remain less than significant. 17.c. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City of Temecula and do not contain sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Construction of the Project would alter pedestrian and vehicular access to the Project Site (i.e. new sidewalks, curbs, etc.). The proposed internal circulation and vehicular access adhere to the City’s design standards in relation to protection or pedestrian and bicycle traffic and does not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. No further analysis of this topic is required. 17.d. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City of Temecula. The Project includes adequate emergency access and would implement traffic control measures such as construction flagmen, signage, etc. as needed. Furthermore, final design plans would be reviewed by the City Public Works Department and Temecula FD to ensure adequate emergency access is maintained. The Project is not part of a City- designated emergency evacuation route nor would it prevent implementation of the City’s emergency response plan. Therefore, construction of the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access and would have a less than significant impact. 43 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a Site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: X i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Comments: Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified 2010 Program EIR, as it was certified prior to the existence of AB 52, which requires the evaluation of Tribal Cultural Resources in CEQA documents. The City of Temecula consulted with the Pechanga Tribe on April 21, 2020 to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga Tribe identified the Old Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural Property, 'éxva Teméeku. In addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources during ground disturbing activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. Changes in the California Environmental Quality Act, effective July 2015, require that the City address a new category of cultural resources – tribal cultural resources – not previously included within the law’s purview. Tribal Cultural Resources are those resources with inherent tribal values that are difficult to identify through the same means as archaeological resources. These resources can only be identified and understood through direct consultation with the tribes who attach tribal value to the resource. Through consultation pursuant to AB 52, the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians (“Tribe”) identified the Old Town Specific Plan (“Project”) as being located within the boundaries of a recorded Traditional Cultural Property, 'éxva Teméeku. All Luiseño People were created at ‘éxva Teméeku, and this expansive Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) also includes locations where pivotal historic events occurred related to the Tribe’s continued existence, including the creation of the Pechanga Indian Reservation. 44 The origin of the Luiseño people is the single most important account in the Tribe’s culture and oral tradition. The Tribe’s present-day practices, beliefs, cultural identity, and social structure are directly related to the Tribe’s Creation, which occurred within the Project area. Luiseño history begins with the Creation of all things at ‘éxva Teméeku and the surrounding places. The name ‘éxva (EXH-vah) can be translated as a “place of sand” and Teméeku (Teh-MEH-koo) means sun place.” The place known today as Temecula derives its etymology from this physical place, where the Murrieta and Temecula Creeks converge to form the Santa Margarita River, which flows onto the Pacific Ocean. Because the name ‘éxva Teméeku is so well known it is often mischaracterized as the place of Creation for Pechanga, but in fact, ‘éxva Teméeku is only one portion that is the central to a geographical area that is the place of Tribe’s origin. Éxva Teméeku has always been an integral part of Luiseño culture and identity. Mourning ceremonies and songs are directly related to the creation of the First People and the events surrounding Wuyóot’s death. Several scholars have recorded and analyzed Luiseño songs and ceremonies including Constance Dubois (1908), William Strong (1929), Helen H. Roberts (1933), John P. Harrington (1932-1941), and Ralph Heidsiek (1966). Their consultants always stressed the importance of the Origin account to the structure of Luiseño society and culture. Heidsiek recognized the creation account as “the source of subject matter for all significant Luiseño songs and the basis for guiding traditional social behavior” 1966, 53). Roberts, who interviewed Pechanga tribal elders, understood the death and mourning ceremonies to be related to the events surrounding Wuyóot’s death and that the songs and traditions are not only shared amongst the Luiseño, but also neighboring groups (Roberts 1933, 7). Strong found “all songs connected with the mourning ceremonies seem to refer to the creation story, especially that portion concerning the dying god Wiyot” (1929, 322). Harrington’s consultants also describe the importance of ‘éxvaTeméeku. Josefa Verdugo accompanied Harrington on a place name trip in 1933 and said “all the stories mention ‘éxva Teméeku as the first place for starting everything” (Harrington 1986, 3:119:264). One of Harrington’s main Luiseño consultants and traditional singer, Jose Albañes, stated “’éxva timéeku [is] the main place where the people were born” and the place where they “burned” Wuyóot (Harrington 1986, 3:125:165). Albañes and Juan Sotelo Calac, another prominent Luiseño ceremonial leader, said there are many songs that mention ‘éxva Teméeku (Harrington 1986, 3:119:166) Bernardo Cuevas, the son of Salvador Cuevas who was one of Constance DuBois’ consultants, told Harrington the “old people in ceremonials talk of that after Wuyóot died, the people were living at Temecula and from Temecula they scattered” (Harrington 1986, 3:115:260). In addition to being located within the TCP, there are placenames in the near vicinity of the Project, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The information on the tribal cultural resources within the Project area supports that the Old Town area of Temecula maintains cultural sensitivity. While the TCP was not included or assessed in the 2010 Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the impacts to the tribal cultural resource are consistent with those identified in the prior CEQA review. The Project area is located in in-fill, which means the surrounding area was largely developed prior to the 2010 EIR. The impacts to both cultural resources and tribal cultural resources have, for the most part, already occurred and additional impacts from the current Project can be reduced to a level below significance with the incorporation of slightly modified mitigation measures from the 2010 EIR. Given the sensitivity that continues to exist in the Old Town area of Temecula, the Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources and tribal cultural resources during ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. The inclusion of the Mitigation Measures listed below, which have only been modified slightly from the prior measures to provide additional process and clarity, will reduce the impacts to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources to less than significant. The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. These refinements are included in Section 5 Cultural Resources) of this Initial Study/EIR Addendum and are included herein again in this section for ease of reference. The refinements to the to the 2010 PEIR mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural/Tribal Cultural 45 Resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new information. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project-specific basis prior to the City’s approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground- disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources, and/or re-burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or 46 by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: o Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials 47 have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report. Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Tribal cultural resources are defined as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in a local register of historical resources, or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant. A cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources, unique archaeological resources, or non- unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet these criteria. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to tribal cultural resources are identified, and are conditioned appropriately. As a result, tribal cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan Amendment would be less than significant. 48 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? X b Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and responsibly foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? X c Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X d Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? X e Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, utilities and service systems impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 19.a. Same Impact. The Project would connect to the existing water system for the City of Temecula. As discussed in the Hydrology Section, the proposed drainage system is designed to increase stormwater retention and infiltration onsite for the treatment of wastewater. The Project would connect to existing electric power and would not require new telecommunication facilities. Relocation of utilities would not be required as part of the Project. Therefore, the impacts are less than significant, and no further analysis of this issue is necessary. 19.b. Same Impact. As discussed in the Hydrology Section Response 10.b, the Project is part of the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Implementation of the Project would not result in an increase in water demand. The proposed Project is considered as part of the full build-out area, and therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply expected for the RCWD during normal, dry, and multiple dry years and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on water supplies. 49 19.c. Same Impact. The Project area is designed to treat additional stormwater flow onsite and therefore would not exceed the capacity of wastewater treatment facilities serving the Project area. Therefore, the Project impacts would be less than significant and no further analysis of this issue is necessary. 19.d. and e. Same Impact. The City of Temecula has a contract with CR&R Inc. for trash and recycling services. CR&R Inc. have a total of six disposal facilities which provide state of the art recycling and green waste programs. Given the capabilities of the CR&R and the small amount of solid waste that would be generated by Project construction and operation, the Project is not expected to generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Additionally, solid waste management under CR&R Inc. is required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Therefore, the Project would also be in compliance with these requirements. Therefore, the impact of the Project on solid waste would be less than significant and would comply with all applicable regulations. 50 20. WILDFIRE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X b Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? X c Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? X d Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X Comments: Wildfire Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the site’s urbanized area. 51 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR and the mandatory findings of significance would be the same as identified in the 2010 Program EIR. 21.a. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not anticipated to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. Furthermore, any potential impacts would be less than significant. 21.b-c. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not anticipated to have incremental effects that would be cumulatively considerable effects in context of the effects of past, current and probable future projects nor is it expected to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly. Impacts would be less than significant. Sources California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System. 52 City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-3, Agricultural Resources, page OS-19. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2019. Area Designations Maps – State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019. CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019. City of Temecula. Chapter 8.48 Heritage Tree Ordinance. Available: http://www.qcode.us/codes/temecula/view.php?topic=8-8_48-i-8_48_150. Accessed December 12, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1, Seismic Hazards, page PS-7. 53 California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Land Use Element, Figure LU-2, French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones, page LU-7. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, page PS-11. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space/Conservation Element, page OS-21. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire), Orange County Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area (SRA), Adopted by Cal Fire on November 7, 2007. Accessed at http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_zones_maps. Accessed on June 27, 2019. Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards State Clearinghouse No. 2009071049 Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 951) 694-6400 April 2020 Overview This Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Addendum has been prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) Amendment No. 9 – Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards project. It is an Addendum to the 2010 Program EIR that was prepared and certified for the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 7, and which is now final. An Initial Study Checklist and environmental analysis has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental impacts will result from the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9), in comparison to the impacts identified in the certified and final 2010 PEIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one of the following conclusions: Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified PEIR As documented in the attached Initial Study checklist, the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 does not result in any new or increased impacts as compared to the analysis in the previously certified 2010 PEIR. As such, an EIR Addendum is the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document for Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 1 City of Temecula California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Initial Study / Environmental Checklist Project Title Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 - Downtown Core District Hotel Development Standards Project OTSP originally adopted on February 22, 1994 (Ordinance No. 94-05) Previous Adopted Specific Plan Amendments (SPA): SPA 1 - January 23, 1996 (Ordinance No. 96-01) SPA 2 - May 13, 1997 (Ordinance No. 97-06) SPA 3 - July 13, 1999 (Ordinance No. 99-12) SPA 4 - October 10, 2000 (Ordinance No. 00-11) SPA 5 - August 24, 2004 (Ordinance No. 04-08) SPA 6 - June 13, 2006 (Ordinance No. 06-07) SPA 7 - May 25, 2010 (Ordinance No. 10-09) SPA 8 - September 5, 2017 (Resolution No.17-56) Previous CEQA Document State Clearinghouse Number SCH# 2009071049 – Old Town Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 Program EIR – Certified February 2010 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 Contact Person and Phone Number Stuart Fisk, Principal Planner 951) 506-5159 Project Location/History Project Location The Project area is located in the southwest portion of the City of Temecula, which is located within the County of Riverside approximately 85 miles southeast of Los Angeles, 60 miles northeast of San Diego, and 25 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1). The Project site is located within the Old Town area of the City of Temecula, west of Interstate 15 (I-15), south of Rancho California Road, east of Pujol Street and generally north of First Street/Santiago Road (Figure 2). The overall OTSP and the Downtown Core Zoning District and Downtown Core Hotel Overlay zone is shown in Figure 3. Project History Temecula was incorporated on December 1, 1989. On November 9, 1993, Temecula adopted the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan. Since then, 14 specific plans have been adopted to govern defined geographic regions of the City. The Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) was prepared in 1992 and 1993 under the direction of a City Council -appointed steering committee. The Steering Committee members represented a wide range of local business and resident interests. The OTSP was adopted by the City Council on February 8, 2 1994. The original purpose of the document was to provide a comprehensive plan for land use, development regulations, design guidelines, vehicular circulation, parking, development incentives and other related actions aimed at implementing the goals and objectives set forth in the document itself. The Specific Plan for Old Town was adopted on February 22, 1994. Between 1994 and 2006, six amendments were made to the Specific Plan, primarily with regard to building height standards, requirements for outdoor vendors, sign regulations, land uses, parking standards, historic preservation zoning and standards, and setback and landscape standards. On May 25, 2010, the City Council adopted the seventh amendment to the OTSP, which was a comprehensive revision to the entire Old Town Specific Plan, and a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified. The eighth amendment to the OTSP relocated a portion of the Downtown Core Hotel Overlay zone. The OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 7 was adopted May 25, 2010 and a Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified May 11, 2010). The primary purpose of the OTSP SPA No. 7 was to incorporate form-based code principles into the Specific Plan to more clearly define development regulations, to better facilitate pedestrian friendly development through building placement and streetscapes, and to encourage mixed-use development within Old Town. The Specific Plan Amendment was intended to achieve these goals through changes to site planning standards and guidelines, streetscape standards and guidelines, land use district locations and titles, architectural standards and guidelines, parking lot guidelines, public art guidelines, paving material guidelines, outdoor dining/sidewalk furniture guidelines, sign regulations and guidelines, alley guidelines, and landscape guidelines within the Specific Plan. SPA No. 7 also resulted in the annexation of approximately 2.4 acres into the Specific Plan at a location south of First Street, along the west side of Old Town Front Street, and the removal of approximately 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the intersection of 6th Street and Pujol Street. The proposed project site has also been evaluated in previous planning documents including: Old Town Specific Plan, Originally Adopted February 22, 1994 (Revised January 23, 1996, May 13, 1997, July 13, 1999, October 10, 2000, August 24, 2004, June 13, 2006, May 25, 2010, and September 5, 2017). City of Temecula General Plan EIR, prepared by The Planning Center, updated 2005. Program Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2009072049) – Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 (Certified May 11, 2010) Old Town Specific Plan Specific Plan Amendment 7 – Adopted May 25, 2010 3 Truax Hotel/Hotel Overlay Zone Boundary Modification EIR (SCH 2017011029), adopted September 2017 2010 Program EIR Summary The Program EIR evaluated the effect of SPA No. 7 on the following environmental factors: Aesthetics, Air Quality, Global Warming/Climate Change, Cultural Resources, Hydrology, Land Use & Planning, Noise, Utilities and Public Services and Traffic and Transportation. Project related temporary impacts to air quality, global warming/climate change and noise were determined to be significant and unavoidable, with the remaining issue areas (Aesthetics, Cultural Resources, Land Use and Planning, Utilities and Public Services and Traffic and Transportation) determined to be less than significant. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for the significant and unavoidable impacts. The Program EIR and findings are available for review at the City of Temecula. The Program EIR evaluated impacts associated with the following OTSP SPA 7 project description: Commercial: 1,043,928 Square Feet Hotel: 499 Rooms Residential (MF): 2,377 Units Residential (SF): 31 Units Civic: 159,809 Square Feet Office: 835,494 Square Feet The Program EIR project description included the following discussion of the Downtown Core District: Downtown Core District The Downtown Core District located along the east edge of the Open Space corridor, which contains Murrieta Creek, is intended to provide for uses that will support pedestrian-oriented and mixed-use development. This district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories that are intended to accommodate art galleries, museums, restaurants and small-scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops, or similar retail uses, offices and service-oriented uses. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core, but residential and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or office use (with parking). Cumulative projects included in the Program EIR impact evaluation included the Springhill Suites and Crown Plaza hotel projects 4 Project Sponsor’s Name and Address City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 General Plan Designation Specific Plan Implementation - Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5) – Downtown Core District Zoning SP-5 Description of Project Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 9 is proposed to modify the requirements in the Specific Plan for multi-story buildings within the Downtown Core Zoning District to allow four story hotels. Currently, the existing Specific Plan (Section IV.B.2.a) requires four story buildings to provide at least one floor of residential or one floor of office use with parking. The Downtown Core Hotel Overlay Zone, located within the Downtown Core zoning designation, does not require residential or office to be included in hotels. The existing OTSP allows for up to 499 Hotel Rooms within the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts, based on a market study that supported the 2010 Specific Plan Amendment and Program EIR. Of those 499 allowable hotel rooms, 343 hotel rooms have already either been constructed or approved, leaving a balance of 156 hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program EIR. Projects that exceed 499 total hotel rooms will be required to prepare additional CEQA documentation. SPA No. 9 also proposes to add footnotes to Table IV-8 (Allowable Building Types and Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District), Table IV-17 (Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District), and Table IV-28 (Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood Residential District) of the Specific Plan to state that “Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the building consistent with its architectural style analysis. A Minor Exception is not intended to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building or to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or more stories.” Because the Minor Exception is already available for development in Old Town and the footnote proposed above is intended to clarify the intended use of the Minor Exception and will not allow for anything different or greater than what is currently allowed, no further discussion of this proposed addition to the Specific Plan will occur in this Addendum. Section IV.B.2.a in the Specific Plan (Land Use and Urban Development Standards/Old Town Zoning Districts/Downtown Core (DTC) currently reads as follows: 5 The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed-use development. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office with parking) is provided). The Downtown Core is intended to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment-oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses, offices and service-oriented uses. Residential development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and mixed-use developments are also anticipated within this district. Service and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but are also restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor of office with on-site parking.” The proposed language for Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would revise Section IV.B. 2.a (Old Town Zoning Districts / Downtown Core (DTC) to read as follows: The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed-use development. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided; when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided, or when four floors of hotel are provided). The Downtown Core is intended to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment-oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift, specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses, offices and service- oriented uses. Residential development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and mixed-use developments are also anticipated within this district. Service uses identified in Table IV-1 and office uses are restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but are also restricted to the second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street. All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use, one floor of office with onsite parking; or four stories of hotel uses.” The footnote (P4) in Table IV-1 (Land Use Matrix) for hotel uses in the Downtown Core/Downtown Core-Hotel Overlay District will reference the above revised language. The above amended OTSP Downtown Core District text still allows for a maximum of 499 hotel rooms within the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts. This EIR Addendum will focus the environmental analysis on any changes in environmental impacts that would result from allowing four story hotels in addition to the Downtown Core Zoning 6 Appendix A: Traffic Memo District’s current allowance for 4-story buildings if one floor of residential or office (with parking) is provided in multi-story buildings. Four story hotel buildings may result in additional or fewer actual hotel projects, although the number of hotel rooms will not change from 499 as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. No specific hotel projects are proposed as part of this Specific Plan Amendment. Additional CEQA documentation will be required for future hotel project applications in the OTSP if they exceed the 499 total hotel rooms analyzed in the 2010 Program EIR for the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed- Use Districts. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The following describes each land use surrounding the Project Site: North – The Specific Plan Area is bordered immediately to the north by Rancho California Road, which provides direct access to Interstate 15 (1- 15), central Temecula and the unincorporated De Luz area. Commercial and Business Park land uses are located north of the Specific Plan area. West – The Specific Plan area is bordered immediately to the west by the escarpment hillside and the Altair Specific Plan. South – The Project Site is generally bordered to the south by First Street/Santiago Road. The area south of First Street includes commercial and open space land uses. East – The Project Site is bordered immediately to the east by Interstate 15 I-15). Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required The Project is anticipated to require the following review and approvals: Agency Action City of Temecula • Approval of Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 Adoption of EIR Addendum 7 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected This Initial Study Checklist has been prepared to determine if any additional environmental impacts will result with adoption of the OTSP Specific Plan Amendment (No. 9) in comparison to the impacts identified in the 2010 Certified Program EIR. All environmental factors and checklist questions are evaluated and documented into one of the following conclusions: Increased impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR Same impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR Reduced impact as compared to the impact identified in the previously certified Program EIR It is noted that the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Initial Study Checklist was updated in 2019 to modify some of the checklist questions and add additional checklist topical areas. The Initial Study checklist used to scope the content of the 2010 Program EIR was the pre-2019 version and does not entirely match the 2019 updated checklist used in this Addendum. Checklist questions contained in the previous checklist that are not included in the 2019 update, are not evaluated herein. Only those environmental factors evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR are reevaluated in this EIR Addendum checklist, with the exception of Tribal Cultural Resources, which was added to the Initial Study Checklist in 2019. Environmental factors not previously evaluated (except Tribal Cultural Resources) in the 2010 Program EIR are not evaluated herein to ensure consistency between the Program EIR and the EIR Addendum. Specific Plan Amendment 9 proposes to amend hotel-related land use policy within the Downtown Core District. No specific development proposals or locations have been proposed, and future development applications will be subject to further CEQA environmental review at the time that they are submitted. The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population/Housing Biological Resources Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation Energy Transportation Geology/Soils Tribal Cultural Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Utilities/Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Wildfire Hydrology/Water Quality Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use/Planning Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Noise were found to be significant and unavoidable in the 2010 OTSP SPA No. 7 Program EIR. They remain so, within the context of the EIR Addendum, but no increases in these impacts occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 8 Determination To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) project impacts have been determined to be the same or less than identified in the earlier INITIAL STUDY, NEGATIVE DECLARATION or ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM will be prepared and, nothing further is required. Signature Date City of Temecula Printed Name For 9 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 10 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 11 Source: adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2020 12 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan, and evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi -story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, aesthetic impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 1.a. Same Impact. Scenic vistas are views defined as having a valued resource and typically contain scenes such as waterways, the ocean, hills, valleys, or mountains. The City of Temecula contains several scenic vistas which include the hills surrounding the City of Temecula and Santa Ana Mountains to the west and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, the slopes in the Sphere of Influence located west and east of the City limits and other important landforms and historic landscape features as scenic vistas. The rolling hills surrounding the City of Temecula to the south east, and west are designated by the General Plan Community Design Element as important natural features whose public views should be protected and maintained. Therefore, all public and private development projects are subject to review by the City to ensure consistency with the General Plan Community Design Element to maintain public views of scenic resources. A portion of the I-15 from Corona South to the San Diego County line has been named as an Eligible State Scenic Highway. At this time, this area of the I-15 has been designated but is not yet considered a State Scenic Highway (Caltrans, 2016). The Project area is highly urbanized and exhibits relatively flat terrain. Views of the surrounding area, specifically of the Santa Ana Mountains, would not be substantially obstructed or impacted by Project implementation due to the similar elevation of the Project area compared to the surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the Project is required to comply with the General Plan Community Design Element and is subject to review by the City for consistency. Therefore, development within the Project area would result in less than significant impacts related to scenic vistas and the effects would be less than significant. 13 1.b. Same Impact. The Project Site, nearby roadways, and surrounding land are not considered a state scenic highway corridor. Within Riverside County the closest designated State Scenic Highways in Riverside County are along State Route 74 (SR-74) and State Route 243 (SR-243). The area designated as a State Scenic Highway is not visible from the Project Site or the surrounding area and is located approximately 50 miles northeast of the Project Site. The Project is located adjacent to the I-15, which is designated by Caltrans as an Eligible State Scenic Highway; however, it is not officially designated as a State Scenic Highway by Caltrans. Public views of the distant mountains (Cleveland National Forest) to the south from I- 15 would not be obscured by development of the Project. Under the Project, public views of the project area would change from a vacant land to a built environment with multiple story buildings. However, the proposed Project is consistent with surrounding residential and commercial uses. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts would occur to passenger views along the I-15 and impacts would be less than significant. 1.c. Same Impact. The Project area is currently developed with urban uses. The Project would modify the existing visual character and quality of the area through the addition of up to four (4) story hotels; however, the proposed hotel uses are located with an urban area and are consistent and visually compatible with the uses located in the vicinity of the project area. Additionally, four story buildings are a Permitted Use in the OTSP Downtown Core District (when at least one floor of residential or one floor of office (with parking) is provided) and are consistent with the City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance. Because the visual character would be similar to the surrounding land uses and is a permitted use under the OTSP and current zoning, the Project is consistent with surrounding land uses and would have a less than significant impact on the visual character of the area. 1.d. Same Impact. The Project Site is located within a developed and urban area within the City of Temecula. New sources of exterior lighting and interior lighting would be included as part of the Project and be subject to light pollution regulations in Chapter 17.22 Section 17.22.176 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, the County of Riverside’s Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance, and the City of Temecula General Plan Policy 2.5 of the Community Design Elements. Lighting would be downward shielded and dark sky compliant to minimize lighting and glare. Daytime glare is attributed to the reflection of artificial and natural lighting off of highly reflective surfaces, such as windows. Mid-rise buildings with large surface areas of reflective or mirrorlike materials are a common source of daytime glare, especially around sunrise and sunset. In addition to 4-story buildings with a minimum of one floor of residential or one floor of office (with parking), the proposed Project allows for up to four (4) story hotels which would be built with textured, non-reflective surfaces, non-reflective (mirrored) glass and downward shielded lighting to minimize glare and prevent spillover onto adjacent structures. As a result, the Project would result in a less than significant glare impact. References: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System. 14 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to initial Study location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Comments: 2.a-e. Agricultural and Forest Resources impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 15 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? X c Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X d Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential-Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, air quality impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 3.a. Same Impact. The 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) serves as South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) state implementation plan (SIP) submittal to California Air Resources Board (CARB) to track the path towards the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) reaching attainment under the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). The Project area is designated as OTSP Downtown Core District. The Project is a Permitted Use of the Downtown Core District and the City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance and would therefore be consistent with existing general plan land use designations. Emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 computer program (CAPCOA 2016). Detailed information regarding modeling assumptions and outputs can be found in Appendix A. Project construction would generate exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicle trips, fugitive dust from demolition and ground disturbing activities, and off-gas emissions from architectural coatings and paving. Operation of the Project would increase the amount of operational air emissions from vehicles accessing the project site (mobile sources), natural gas consumption (energy sources), and use of consumer products and operation of landscaping equipment (area sources). However, as discussed below, construction and operation of the project would not result in daily emissions in exceedance of the SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance for emissions of ROG, NO X , PM 10 , and PM2.5 . As discussed above, the SCAB is in nonattainment for several of the NAAQS (ozone and PM2.5 ) and CAAQS (ozone, PM 10 , and PM 2.5 ). Because emissions of ROG, NO X , PM 2.5 , and PM 10 would not exceed these thresholds, construction- and operation- related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors would not conflict with an applicable AQMP. This impact would be less than significant. 16 3.b. Same Impact. As discussed above, construction of the Project would generate criteria pollutants and precursor emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment, worker commute trips, and fugitive dust emissions. The Project would generate emissions associated with typical activities associated with congregate car including mobile source emissions from worker commute trips, persons visiting residents of the Project areas, and residents’ use of vehicles. Natural gas would also be directly consumed on-site from natural gas–powered stove tops and fireplaces as well as indirectly consumed to produce energy to power the Project. The infrequent application of paint, use of consumer products and landscaping equipment, and application of fertilizers on landscaped areas would also result in operational emissions of air pollutants. Thus, construction- and operation-related emissions of ROG, NOX , PM 2.5 , and PM 10 would remain significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no greater impacts would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 3.c. Same Impact. Implementation of the Project would not introduce any new long-term operational sources of TACs. Therefore, construction related TACs will comprise the analysis of substantial pollutant concentrations. In relation to air quality, sensitive receptors include infants and children, the elderly, people with illnesses, or others who are especially sensitive to the adverse health effects of air pollutants (discussed previously). Hospitals, schools, convalescent facilities, and residential housing are examples of land uses with populations who are sensitive to air quality impacts. Existing sensitive receptors within the Project Site include residences to the north, south, east, and west and the ABC Child Care Center to the northeast of the Project Site. Construction-related activities would result in temporary, intermittent emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) from the exhaust of heavy-duty off-road diesel equipment used for construction of the Project. On-road, diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the project site during construction to deliver materials and equipment would not operate at a single location for extended periods and therefore would not expose a single receptor to excessive diesel PM emissions. This analysis focuses primarily on heavy duty construction equipment used on-site that may affect nearby off- site land uses. Considering the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, the relatively low mass of diesel PM emissions that would be generated during project construction, the relatively short period during which diesel PM-emitting construction activity would take place in the same location near the same receptors, it is anticipated construction-related TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to an incremental increase in cancer risk that exceeds 10 in one million or a hazard index of 1.0 or greater. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable based on the analysis in the previously certified EIR; no greater impacts would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 3.d. Same Impact. Odors are typically associated with industrial activities involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes. Odors are also associated with such uses as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided and would not change the types of uses allowed within the overall specific plan area. The Project would not introduce any major odor-producing uses that would have the potential to affect a substantial number of people. It is expected refuse generated from future development of the Project would be temporarily stored in covered containers and would be removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations. Activities and materials associated with construction would be typical of construction projects of similar type and size. Any odors that may be generated during construction of future development of the Project would be localized and would not be sufficient to affect a substantial number of people or result in a nuisance as defined by SCAQMD Rule 402. Impacts with regard to odors would be less than significant. 17 References: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2019. Area Designations Maps – State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019. CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019. 18 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery Sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a – f. Biological Resources were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 19 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? X c Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects submitted for development review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources are identified, and to ensure that appropriate conditions of approval are applied. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 5.a. Same Impact. A historical resource is defined in Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as any object, building, structure, Site, area, place, record, or manuscript determined to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. Historical resources are further defined as being associated with significant events, important persons, or distinctive characteristics of a type, period or method of construction; representing the work of an important creative individual; possessing high artistic values; or yielding information important in prehistory or history. Resources listed in or determined eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register, or identified as significant in a historic resource survey are also considered historical resources under CEQA. Future project construction consistent with SPA 9 would require grading and excavation in areas which could contain previously recorded historic resources. Additional CEQA analysis and documentation will be required when specific projects are proposed. Less than significant impact with prior mitigation incorporated. 5.b. Same Impact. Section 15064.5(a)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines generally defines archaeological resources as any resource that “has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.” Archaeological resources are features, such as tools, utensils, carvings, fabric, building foundations, etc., that document evidence of past human endeavors and that may be historically or culturally important to a significant earlier community. The City of Temecula consulted on April 21, 2020 with the Pechanga Tribe to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga Tribe identified the Old Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural 20 Property, 'éxva Teméeku. In addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources during ground disturbing activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. The following refinements to the 2010 PEIR mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new information. The mitigation measure refinements are as follows: Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project-specific basis prior to the City’s approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground- disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources, and/or re-burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning 21 Commission and/or City Council. Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: o Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV 22 Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report. Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. In addition, Tribal Cultural Resources are defined in the CEQA statute and Guidelines as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in a local register of historical resources, or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant. A cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources, unique archaeological resources, or non-unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet these criteria. Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources are evaluated in Section 18 of this Initial Study Checklist. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development review to the City of Temecula will be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to cultural resources are identified, and where required, are mitigated. As a result, cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan 23 Amendment would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. Less than significant impact with prior mitigation incorporated. 5.c. Same Impact. The Project Site is located in an urbanized area of the City. Project construction would require ground disturbing activities included grading and excavation in a previously undeveloped area. Although no known human remains exist onsite there is a potential that ground disturbing activates could disturb previously unknown human remains. Therefore, impacts to human remains would remain less than significant with implementation of the previously adopted mitigation measures. References: City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-2, Historic Structures and Sites, page OS-16. 24 6. ENERGY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? X b Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X Comments: 6.a-b. Energy Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 which does not change the types of uses allowed in the overall Old Town Specific Plan area. 25 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv. Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-Site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X f Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or Site or unique geologic feature? X Comments: 7.a-f. Geology and Soils Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area, including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of the current OTSP area. 26 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, greenhouse gas emission impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 8.a. Same Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would increase GHG emissions which have the potential to cumulatively result in a significant impact on the environment. Construction-related activities that would generate GHG emissions include operation of heavy-duty equipment and work commute vehicle trips to and from the Project site. Operation of the Project would result in GHG emissions from vehicle trips accessing the Project site (mobile sector), electricity and natural gas combustion (energy sector), operation of landscaping equipment (area sector), treatment of water and wastewater (water sector), and decomposition of solid wastes at landfills (solid waste sector). Emissions from these sectors and from construction-related activities were modeled using CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. For the reason stated above, construction and operation of the Project would result in a significant climate change impact. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. 8.b. Same Impact. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may conflict with applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions, as discussed in CARB’s 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017 Scoping Plan), Southern California Association of Government’s SCAG’s) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and the City of Temecula’s Sustainability Plan. The Project’s location in proximity to commercial and other residential uses and its proximity to transit service renders the project consistent with and in support of the goals and benefits of the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS, which seeks “improved mobility and accessibility… to reach desired destinations with relative ease and within a reasonable time, using reasonably available transportation choices.” The project would support the SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS implementation of “strategies focused on compact infill development, superior placemaking (the process of creating public spaces that are appealing), and expanded housing and transportation choices.” As such, the project would be consistent with regional plans to reduce VMT and associated GHG emissions. City of Temecula Sustainability Plan The City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to identify and address current and future climate change goals. The Sustainability Plan includes several goals for reducing GHG emissions through energy and water 27 efficiency, waste reduction, and embracing cleaner technology. The Project would be consistent with the applicable sustainability goals outlined in the plan. The Sustainability Plan incorporates the following goals which would be applicable to the Project: Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs that support this goal. Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs. Reduce total waste generated and reduce the use and release of household hazardous waste. Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). The Project would minimize energy consumption through the use on energy metering and would support the use of clean energy through meeting the Tier 1 Standards of the CalGreen Code. Energy consumption would additionally be reduced through compliance with the 2019 California Energy Code, which achieved a 53 percent reduction in residential energy use as compared to the 2016 California Energy Code through solar photovoltaic installation requirements. Furthermore, as discussed above, the project would be located close to existing public transit and would encourage multi- modal transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). The project’s consistency with these goals along with the 2017 Scoping Plan and SCAG RTP/SCS would ensure that the project would not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or regulations for reducing the emission of GHGs. As such the Project would not conflict with any applicable plans or policies and impacts would be less than significant. References: California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main- presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. 28 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a Site which is included on a list of hazardous materials Sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? X f Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X g Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? X Comments: 9.a-g. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area, including the fact that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would occur within the footprint of the current OTSP area. 29 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? X b Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the Site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of imperious surfaces, in a manner which would: X i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; X ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; X iii) create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or X iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X d In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk or release of pollutants due to project inundation? X e Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and Evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 10.a. Same Impact. The Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and is required to comply with the development planning requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) MS4 permit and the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance. As shown in Figure 3, the proposed Project design implements non-structural, structural, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs), which can include infiltration basin, detention basin, vegetated swale, media filter, pervious concrete, storm drain stenciling or signage, protection of material and trash storage areas from rainfall, and vector avoidance strategies. The proposed Project Site drainage would 30 implement the following BMPs in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan: capture and convey stormwater runoff from developed areas to underground retention/detention stormwater water quality mitigation system via private storm drain inlets and drainage networks. Development of the Project is required to comply with all water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. By complying with the requirements for a Priority Development Project impacts related to violation of water quality standards and waste discharge requirements of the Project are anticipated to be less than significant. 10.b. Same Impact. Water would be supplied to the Project by the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The Project would slightly increase the demand for water from the RCWD. The RCWD currently obtains water from the following primary water sources: 1) local groundwater from the Murrieta-Temecula Groundwater Basin; 2) imported State Water Project (SWP) and Colorado River water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) through the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD); and 3) recycled water from both the District and EMWD facilities. The Water Facilities Master Plan predicts an additional annual groundwater capacity which will be generated through increasing artificial recharge of the groundwater basin by 22,443 acres feet per year (AFY). An additional annual supply of 5,319 AFY of recycled water is also anticipated by buildout. The full build-out annual capacity of the EWMD is anticipated to be 115,002 AFY which is greater than the projected build-out annual production requirement of 110,714 AFY. The proposed Project is considered as part of the full build-out area, and therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply for the EMWD and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. As discussed in response 10.a. the Project is designed to promote stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Therefore, Project impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.i. Same Impact. The proposed Project area is designated a Priority Development Project area and therefore the Project area is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Additionally, future Project design is required to comply with the local City of Temecula Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance (Chapter 8.28 et seq.) and regional MS4 Permit (California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100) requirements for stormwater management; as well as the requirements of the City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual (Chapter 18) and the City of Temecula Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (Chapter 18.18 et seq.) Potential erosion, siltation, and increased runoff would be minimized through implementation of the WQMP and adherence to the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). With implementation of erosion and sediment control BMPs, construction would result in a less than significant erosion, siltation, and runoff impact. 10.c.ii. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone. The Project is required to implement a SWPPP during construction to reduce pollutants and stormwater runoff. Compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements minimize potential impacts related to flooding. Therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. Construction within the Project Site would be required to comply with the development planning requirements of the SDRWQCB MS4 permit and the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance. Future projects would be required to generate a project specific WQMP as required by the City of Temecula Stormwater Ordinance and as specified in the City’s Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan. The implementation of the specific drainage features within each WQMP, would ensure that the Project would meet the City’s MS4 Permit and Stormwater Ordinance requirements. As a part of the WQMP, the Project would be required to incorporate and maintain LID BMPs into the project design, which include measures to reduce increases in runoff through hydromodification and infiltration protection. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 10.c.iv. Same Impact. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone. Therefore, development of the Project area would not result in impacts related to impeding or redirecting flood flows. The Project would have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary. 31 10.d. Same Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a body of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin, such as a reservoir, harbor, lake, or storage tank. A tsunami is a great sea wave, commonly referred to as a tidal wave, produced by a significant undersea disturbance such as tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with large, shallow earthquakes. Mudflows result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity. According to Figure PS-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone or within a dam inundation area. The Project Site is not subject to tsunami hazards given its distance to the Pacific Ocean. Furthermore, the gently sloping topography of the project area is not conducive to sustaining mudflows. The Project would have no impact and analysis of this issue is not necessary. 10.e. Same Impact. Future projects shall be designed to not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Future projects would be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. The Project would be required to implement a SWPPP during construction that includes BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from the Project Site. By complying with the NPDES requirements, potential impacts to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan are anticipated to be less than significant. No further analysis of this topic is required. References: City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, page PS-11. 32 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Physically divide an established community? X b Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, land use and planning impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 11.a. Same Impact. The Specific Plan Amendment would not divide and established community and would result in the same number of hotel rooms (499) as the existing Specific Plan. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi- story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided) or when four floors of hotel are provided. No changes to the existing General Plan land use designations would be made and the Project is consistent with surrounding residential and commercial land uses. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. 11.b. Same Impact. As discussed under Response 11.a., the proposed project would not change the existing General Plan land use designations or other policy or regulation, other than revising the Specific Plan to indicate that in the Downtown Core Zoning district four story hotels will be permitted in addition to buildings currently permitted of up to four stories when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided. As a result, land use and planning impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the current City General Plan and City Zoning. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and environmental impact. Project impacts would be less than significant in this regard. 33 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery Site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? X Comments: 12.a-b. Mineral Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the current urbanized area. 34 13. NOISE. Would the project result in the: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, noise impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. Comments: 13.a. Same Impact. Noise is defined as unwanted sound; however, not all unwanted sound rises to the level of a potentially significant noise impact. To differentiate unwanted sound from potentially significant noise impacts, the City has established noise regulations that consider noise-sensitive land uses. The following discussion includes a brief description of the fundamental principles of noise and commonly used noise descriptors, a summary of applicable noise standards, and an evaluation of project-generated construction and operational noise. NOISE PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTORS Audible sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured in units of decibels on a logarithmic scale. The “pitch” (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured in hertz. Most common environmental sounds are composed of a composite of frequencies. The time-varying characteristic of environmental noise over specified periods of time is described using statistical noise descriptors in terms of a single numerical value, expressed as A-weighted decibels (dbA). The noise descriptors used in this analysis are summarized below: L eq : The L eq , or equivalent sound level, is used to describe the noise level over a specified period of time, typically 1- hour, expressed as Leq . The L eq may also be referred to as the “average” sound level. 35 Lmax : The maximum, instantaneous noise level. CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level is the average noise level over a 24-hour day that includes an addition of 5 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and an addition of 10 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours, respectively. CITY OF TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE The Municipal Code Title 8 Chapter 9.20,” Noise,” declares that the making, creating, or continuance of excessive noises are detrimental to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, and prosperity of the residents of the City. Section 9.20.060 establishes sound level limits. The exterior noise limits for each land use classification are summarized in Table 13-1. One-hour average sound levels are not to exceed the applicable limit. The noise subject to these limits is defined as that part of the total noise at the specified location that is due solely to the action of said person. Per the Municipal Code Section 9.20.060.D, construction noise levels measured at or beyond the property lines of any property zoned residential shall not exceed an average sound level greater than 65 dBA. Further, construction activity may only occur between 7:00 a.m. through 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction activities on Saturday are limited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. No construction activity shall be undertaken on Sunday and national recognized holidays unless exempted by Section 9.20.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Table 13-1 City of Temecula Land Use/Noise Standards Property Receiving Noise Maximum Noise Level (CNEL, dBA) Type of Land Use Land Use Designation Interior Exterior1 Residential Hillside, Rural, Very Low Density, Low Density, Low-Medium Density 45 65 Medium Density 45 65/702 High Density 45 702 Commercial and Office Neighborhood, Community, Highway Tourist, Service N/A 70 Professional Office 50 70 Light Industrial Industrial Park 55 75 Public/Institutional School 50 65 All Others 50 70 Open Space Vineyards/Agricultural N/A 70 Open Space N/A 70/653 Notes: CNEL = community noise equivalent level, dB = decibel, CNEL = community-noise equivalent level 1 Regarding aircraft-related noise, the maximum acceptable exposure for new residential development is 60 dBA CNEL. 2 Maximum exterior noise levels up to 70 dBA CNEL are allowed for Multiple-Family Housing. 3 Where quiet is a basis required for the land use. Source: City of Temecula 2005 CONSTRUCTION Construction hours are proposed to be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. No demolition would occur. Noise from construction activities would be generated by the operation of vehicles and equipment involved 36 during various stages of construction: site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and paving. The noise levels generated by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type and number of equipment, the specific model (horsepower rating), the construction activities being performed, and the maintenance condition of the equipment. The closest receptors to the project site are approximately 100 feet from the construction site. The City of Temecula has established a construction-noise significance threshold of 65 dB Leq at a site supporting a sensitive receptor. It is foreseeable that construction activities could introduce new levels of noise; however, the extent of construction equipment required to construct the proposed project would be minor due to the size of the project. Moreover, the proposed project would be constructed over a relatively short period (14 months) and would generate low construction- related Average Daily Trips (ADT). Project construction would also be required to adhere to Section 9.20.060.D of the City’s municipal code which stipulates that construction activity must be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Construction noise impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as documented in the 2010 Program EIR; the current SPA 9 proposal would not increase these impacts. OPERATION The existing noise environment in the project vicinity is dominated by traffic noise from nearby roadways, as well as nearby commercial activities. Long-term operations of the proposed project would have a minimal effect on the noise environment within the proximity of the project area. Noise generated by the proposed project would result primarily from the increased traffic on local roads. As a result, project-related traffic noise impacts would remain less than significant. 13.b. Same Impact. The proposed project would not result in any major operational sources of vibration (e.g., rail lines, transit stations), and therefore, this discussion focusses on short-term construction-generated vibration. Prior to the analysis, a brief discussion of vibration principles is included. FOUNDATIONS OF VIBRATION Vibration can be interpreted as energy transmitted in waves through the ground or man-made structures, which generally dissipate with distance from the vibration source. Because energy is lost during the transfer of energy from one particle to another, vibration becomes less perceptible with increasing distance from the source. Vibration sources include the use of heavy-duty equipment during construction. Operational sources include major transit (e.g., rail, transit stations) development. Maintenance operations and traffic traveling on roadways can also be a source of such vibration. If its amplitudes are high enough, ground vibration has the potential to damage structures, cause cosmetic damage or disrupt the operation of vibration-sensitive equipment such as electron microscopes and advanced technology production and research equipment. Ground vibration and ground-borne noise can also be a source of annoyance to individuals who live or work close to vibration-generating activities. Future projects consistent with SPA 9 will require additional CEQA documentation and analysis at the time applications are submitted. Vibration associated with hotel construction allowed by the Specific Plan is expected to be minor, as pile driving is not typically required Thus, impacts associated with construction-related ground vibration and vibration noise would remain less than significant. 13.c. Same Impact. According to Figure LU-2, of the City of Temecula General Plan, the Project Site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The French Valley Airport located at 37600 Sky Canyon Drive, Murrieta, is approximately 4.6 miles northeast of the Project Site. No further analysis of this topic in the Initial Study is required. Thus, impacts associated with airport related noise would remain less than significant. 37 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: Population and Housing Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 38 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, public service impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 15.a. Same Impact. Fire protection and emergency medical services are provided to the City and the Project Site by the Temecula Fire Department (FD), who contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth nor would it result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula FD services and facilities which would require new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Additionally, the future projects would be required to pay the Fire Development Impact Fee at the time of building permit. The Project would have a less than significant impact. 15.b. Same Impact. Police services for the City and the Project Site are provided by the City of Temecula Police Department PD), who contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff Department (RCSD). The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula PD services and facilities which could result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. No further analysis of this topic is required. The Project would have a less than significant impact. 15.c. Same Impact. The Project Site falls under the jurisdiction of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Project development would not generate school-aged children and thus would not result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. The Project would have a less than significant impact on schools. 39 15.d. Same Impact. Project implementation would ultimately introduce hotel occupants and temporary construction workers into the Downtown Core District. This population increase is considered temporary and could possibly increase short term demand on park services and facilities which is not expected to result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on parks. 15.e. Same Impact. The Project Site is currently served by the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, 3.5 miles away at 30600 Pauba Road. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on library services so that there was a need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on library resources. 40 16. RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 16a-b. Recreation Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9. 41 17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? X b Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X c Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X d Result in inadequate emergency access? X Comments: A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) memorandum has been prepared for the SPA by Fehr & Peers, and is included in Appendix A of this EIR Addendum. Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi- story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, transportation/traffic impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 17.a. Same Impact. Project-related construction activities have the potential to result in short-term, temporary impacts to surrounding roadways as a result of construction vehicles and worker vehicle trips, which may cause temporary traffic slowdown or partial road closures. There are no conflicts with a program, pan ordinance or other policy document. Therefore, since these impacts are temporary and short-term, the Project’s impacts would be less than significant. 17.b. Same Impact. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Generally, vehicle miles traveled (or “VMT”) is identified as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. For the purposes of this CEQA section, “vehicle miles traveled” refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Lead agencies are required to approve a VMT significance threshold by July 1, 2020. Because the City of Temecula does not have an approved VMT significance threshold at this time, a VMT evaluation will not be conducted for the Project and it has been determined by the City that a level of service (LOS) evaluation is not required due to the limited changes proposed as part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9, which does not change the overall number of hotel rooms that were previously analyzed in the certified Program EIR. The proposed allowance of hotel use in lieu of either residential or hotel use on the fourth floor, assuming an averaged rate in the Downtown Core could potentially add approximately 10.81 more trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area, including 0.27 more AM peak hour trips and 0.52 more PM peak hour trips per KSF. The trip rates are considered conservative. The conversion of the hotel trip rate to square feet/room does not factor in the hotel common space areas, such as the lobby and conference rooms, as is typically factored into published trip generation rates. Factoring in the common space areas would reduce the converted trip rate for hotel use. 42 Although Level of Service (LOS) analysis is no longer required by CEQA effective July 1, 2020, it was the applicable traffic impact analysis methodology in place when the 2010 Program EIR was certified. The Old Town Specific Plan states than an intersection specific level of service (LOS) E and F will be deemed acceptable along Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road (north loop)”, which is within the Downtown Core. Therefore, the proposed change in land use is not forecast to result in a significant traffic impact. The comparison showed that replacing residential or office use (based on an average rate) with hotel use may result in an additional 10.81 trips per day per 1,000 square feet of area. This minor increase in trip generation would not substantially increase traffic or exceed significance thresholds in the OTSP. The Program EIR did not quantify the potential development of the OTSP policy that states “All four-story buildings in the Downtown Core district must contain at least one floor restricted to residential use or one floor of office with on- site parking”. Additionally, the number of hotel rooms within the Downtown Core is restricted to 499 rooms. Future development that proposes hotel use that exceeds what is covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR will require further CEQA environmental analysis regardless of how many stories are proposed. Since the height of the hotel projects does not change the cap of 499 rooms, the hotel use-related traffic that will be allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment was adequately covered under the 2010 OTSP Program EIR, and would remain less than significant. 17.c. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City of Temecula and do not contain sharp curves or dangerous intersections. Construction of the Project would alter pedestrian and vehicular access to the Project Site (i.e. new sidewalks, curbs, etc.). The proposed internal circulation and vehicular access adhere to the City’s design standards in relation to protection or pedestrian and bicycle traffic and does not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature or incompatible use. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. No further analysis of this topic is required. 17.d. Same Impact. Roadways surrounding the Project Site are part of an established road network that serves the City of Temecula. The Project includes adequate emergency access and would implement traffic control measures such as construction flagmen, signage, etc. as needed. Furthermore, final design plans would be reviewed by the City Public Works Department and Temecula FD to ensure adequate emergency access is maintained. The Project is not part of a City- designated emergency evacuation route nor would it prevent implementation of the City’s emergency response plan. Therefore, construction of the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access and would have a less than significant impact. 43 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a Site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: X i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Comments: Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts were not evaluated in the certified 2010 Program EIR, as it was certified prior to the existence of AB 52, which requires the evaluation of Tribal Cultural Resources in CEQA documents. The City of Temecula consulted with the Pechanga Tribe on April 21, 2020 to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment on archaeological and Tribal Cultural Resources. Through consultation, the Pechanga Tribe identified the Old Town Specific Plan as being located within the boundaries of recorded Traditional Cultural Property, 'éxva Teméeku. In addition, there are placenames within the near vicinity of the Specific Plan, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources during ground disturbing activities within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. Changes in the California Environmental Quality Act, effective July 2015, require that the City address a new category of cultural resources – tribal cultural resources – not previously included within the law’s purview. Tribal Cultural Resources are those resources with inherent tribal values that are difficult to identify through the same means as archaeological resources. These resources can only be identified and understood through direct consultation with the tribes who attach tribal value to the resource. Through consultation pursuant to AB 52, the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians (“Tribe”) identified the Old Town Specific Plan (“Project”) as being located within the boundaries of a recorded Traditional Cultural Property, 'éxva Teméeku. All Luiseño People were created at ‘éxva Teméeku, and this expansive Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) also includes locations where pivotal historic events occurred related to the Tribe’s continued existence, including the creation of the Pechanga Indian Reservation. 44 The origin of the Luiseño people is the single most important account in the Tribe’s culture and oral tradition. The Tribe’s present-day practices, beliefs, cultural identity, and social structure are directly related to the Tribe’s Creation, which occurred within the Project area. Luiseño history begins with the Creation of all things at ‘éxva Teméeku and the surrounding places. The name ‘éxva (EXH-vah) can be translated as a “place of sand” and Teméeku (Teh-MEH-koo) means sun place.” The place known today as Temecula derives its etymology from this physical place, where the Murrieta and Temecula Creeks converge to form the Santa Margarita River, which flows onto the Pacific Ocean. Because the name ‘éxva Teméeku is so well known it is often mischaracterized as the place of Creation for Pechanga, but in fact, ‘éxva Teméeku is only one portion that is the central to a geographical area that is the place of Tribe’s origin. Éxva Teméeku has always been an integral part of Luiseño culture and identity. Mourning ceremonies and songs are directly related to the creation of the First People and the events surrounding Wuyóot’s death. Several scholars have recorded and analyzed Luiseño songs and ceremonies including Constance Dubois (1908), William Strong (1929), Helen H. Roberts (1933), John P. Harrington (1932-1941), and Ralph Heidsiek (1966). Their consultants always stressed the importance of the Origin account to the structure of Luiseño society and culture. Heidsiek recognized the creation account as “the source of subject matter for all significant Luiseño songs and the basis for guiding traditional social behavior” 1966, 53). Roberts, who interviewed Pechanga tribal elders, understood the death and mourning ceremonies to be related to the events surrounding Wuyóot’s death and that the songs and traditions are not only shared amongst the Luiseño, but also neighboring groups (Roberts 1933, 7). Strong found “all songs connected with the mourning ceremonies seem to refer to the creation story, especially that portion concerning the dying god Wiyot” (1929, 322). Harrington’s consultants also describe the importance of ‘éxvaTeméeku. Josefa Verdugo accompanied Harrington on a place name trip in 1933 and said “all the stories mention ‘éxva Teméeku as the first place for starting everything” (Harrington 1986, 3:119:264). One of Harrington’s main Luiseño consultants and traditional singer, Jose Albañes, stated “’éxva timéeku [is] the main place where the people were born” and the place where they “burned” Wuyóot (Harrington 1986, 3:125:165). Albañes and Juan Sotelo Calac, another prominent Luiseño ceremonial leader, said there are many songs that mention ‘éxva Teméeku (Harrington 1986, 3:119:166) Bernardo Cuevas, the son of Salvador Cuevas who was one of Constance DuBois’ consultants, told Harrington the “old people in ceremonials talk of that after Wuyóot died, the people were living at Temecula and from Temecula they scattered” (Harrington 1986, 3:115:260). In addition to being located within the TCP, there are placenames in the near vicinity of the Project, along with a number of recorded cultural resources. The information on the tribal cultural resources within the Project area supports that the Old Town area of Temecula maintains cultural sensitivity. While the TCP was not included or assessed in the 2010 Environmental Impact Report for the Project, the impacts to the tribal cultural resource are consistent with those identified in the prior CEQA review. The Project area is located in in-fill, which means the surrounding area was largely developed prior to the 2010 EIR. The impacts to both cultural resources and tribal cultural resources have, for the most part, already occurred and additional impacts from the current Project can be reduced to a level below significance with the incorporation of slightly modified mitigation measures from the 2010 EIR. Given the sensitivity that continues to exist in the Old Town area of Temecula, the Tribe identified the potential for finding subsurface prehistoric cultural resources and tribal cultural resources during ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed Specific Plan boundaries. The inclusion of the Mitigation Measures listed below, which have only been modified slightly from the prior measures to provide additional process and clarity, will reduce the impacts to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources to less than significant. The Pechanga Tribe provided additional input and refinement to the mitigation measures contained in the 2010 PEIR, due to the amount of time that has transpired since certification of that PEIR. These refinements are included in Section 5 Cultural Resources) of this Initial Study/EIR Addendum and are included herein again in this section for ease of reference. The refinements to the to the 2010 PEIR mitigation measures do not imply that any additional cultural/Tribal Cultural 45 Resource impacts are expected to occur beyond those identified in the 2010 PEIR, and do not represent significant new information. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all areas slated for development or other ground disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project-specific basis prior to the City’s approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground- disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4-1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that during construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors, if needed. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreement entered into with the Pechanga Tribe. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources, and/or re-burial on the property in perpetuity. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, or 46 by the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to certified PEIR MM 3.4-1a to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure 3.4-1f: Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS39, the City of Temecula shall require that in the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: o Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii.) Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Pechanga Tribe curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials 47 have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report. Mitigation Measure 3.4-4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the City of Temecula shall require that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendants regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Tribal cultural resources are defined as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) or included in a local register of historical resources, or a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant. A cultural landscape that meets these criteria is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. Historical resources, unique archaeological resources, or non- unique archaeological resources may also be tribal cultural resources if they meet these criteria. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not directly result in any site-specific hotel development proposals or projects. Future hotel development projects allowed by the Specific Plan Amendment and submitted for development review to the City of Temecula may be subjected to additional CEQA environmental review including cultural resource investigations and tribal consultation pursuant to the CEQA Statute and Guidelines, SB 18 and AB 52. The City of Temecula works closely with local Native American tribes to ensure that all aspects of potential project impacts to tribal cultural resources are identified, and are conditioned appropriately. As a result, tribal cultural resource impacts associated with the Specific Plan Amendment would be less than significant. 48 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? X b Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and responsibly foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? X c Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X d Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? X e Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, utilities and service systems impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR. 19.a. Same Impact. The Project would connect to the existing water system for the City of Temecula. As discussed in the Hydrology Section, the proposed drainage system is designed to increase stormwater retention and infiltration onsite for the treatment of wastewater. The Project would connect to existing electric power and would not require new telecommunication facilities. Relocation of utilities would not be required as part of the Project. Therefore, the impacts are less than significant, and no further analysis of this issue is necessary. 19.b. Same Impact. As discussed in the Hydrology Section Response 10.b, the Project is part of the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Implementation of the Project would not result in an increase in water demand. The proposed Project is considered as part of the full build-out area, and therefore would be adequately served by the projected water supply expected for the RCWD during normal, dry, and multiple dry years and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact on water supplies. 49 19.c. Same Impact. The Project area is designed to treat additional stormwater flow onsite and therefore would not exceed the capacity of wastewater treatment facilities serving the Project area. Therefore, the Project impacts would be less than significant and no further analysis of this issue is necessary. 19.d. and e. Same Impact. The City of Temecula has a contract with CR&R Inc. for trash and recycling services. CR&R Inc. have a total of six disposal facilities which provide state of the art recycling and green waste programs. Given the capabilities of the CR&R and the small amount of solid waste that would be generated by Project construction and operation, the Project is not expected to generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. Additionally, solid waste management under CR&R Inc. is required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Therefore, the Project would also be in compliance with these requirements. Therefore, the impact of the Project on solid waste would be less than significant and would comply with all applicable regulations. 50 20. WILDFIRE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X b Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? X c Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? X d Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X Comments: Wildfire Impacts were not evaluated in the certified Program EIR. No Additional analysis is warranted or required based on the limited scope of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 and the site’s urbanized area. 51 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Increased Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Same Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR Reduced Impact as Compared to Impact Documented in Previous EIR a Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: Implementation of Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would result in the same total number of hotel rooms (499) in the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts as allowed by the existing adopted specific plan and evaluated by the 2010 Program EIR. The Downtown Core Zoning district is defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four stories (when at least one floor of residential is provided, or when at least one floor of office (with parking) is provided). In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment No. 9 would also allow four story buildings in the Downtown Core District when four floors of hotel are provided. As a result, impacts associated with the 499 hotel rooms would remain the same as evaluated in the 2010 Program EIR and the mandatory findings of significance would be the same as identified in the 2010 Program EIR. 21.a. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not anticipated to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. Furthermore, any potential impacts would be less than significant. 21.b-c. Same Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Initial Study, Project development is not anticipated to have incremental effects that would be cumulatively considerable effects in context of the effects of past, current and probable future projects nor is it expected to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly. Impacts would be less than significant. Sources California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016. California Scenic Highways Mapping System. 52 City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-3, Agricultural Resources, page OS-19. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. 2016. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Computer Program. Available: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. Accessed November 13, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2005 (April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2015. User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Last Revised: March 17, 2015. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. 2019. Area Designations Maps – State/National Standards Homepage. Last updated October 24, 2019. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed November 12, 2019. CAPCOA. See California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Available: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Accessed November 13, 2019. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2017 (April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 12, 2019. City of Temecula. Chapter 8.48 Heritage Tree Ordinance. Available: http://www.qcode.us/codes/temecula/view.php?topic=8-8_48-i-8_48_150. Accessed December 12, 2019. California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-1, Seismic Hazards, page PS-7. 53 California Air Resources Board. 2017. 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan. Available: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. CARB. See California Air Resources Board. SCAG. See Southern California Association of Governments. SCAQMD. See South Coast Air Quality Management District. South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas GHG) Significance Threshold -- Attachment E. Available: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 2009 (November 19, 2009). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14 Presentation. Available: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)- ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. Southern California Association of Governments. 2016 (April). The 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Mobility, Accessibility, Sustainability and a High Quality of Life. Available: http://scagrtpscs.net/Documents/2016/final/f2016RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed November 18, 2019. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Land Use Element, Figure LU-2, French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones, page LU-7. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Public Safety Element, Figure PS-2, Flood Hazards and Dam Inundation Areas, page PS-11. City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, 1993, Updated 2005, Open Space/Conservation Element, page OS-21. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire), Orange County Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area (SRA), Adopted by Cal Fire on November 7, 2007. Accessed at http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_zones_maps. Accessed on June 27, 2019. Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: LR21-0279 APPLICANT: City of Temecula PROPOSAL: An amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the environmental impacts of the original project were studied in an EIR that was certified in 2010 (SCH 2009071049) and is now final. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the EIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed modifications do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required. CASE PLANNER: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: October 19, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com October 20, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing Notice of Determination for application Long Range Project No. LR21- 0279, a Specific Plan Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a receipt in the amount of $50.00 for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting to the email listed below. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Eric Jones at email: eric.jones@TemeculaCA.gov Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t e r e s t i n g p o i City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code (Long Range Project No. LR21-0279) State Clearinghouse No.: 2009071049 Project Title: Old Town Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 Project Location: The Old Town Specific Plan area, generally located between Rancho California Road and First Street from north to south, and between Interstate 15 and an area approximately 200 feet west of Pujol Street from east to west. Project Description: An amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to revise certain development standards and land use standards. Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Eric Jones Telephone Number: (951) 506-5115 This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above-described project on _________ and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That an Environmental Impact Report Addendum was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Addendum No. 2 to the EIR, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: