Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10272022 PTS Commission AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 27, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Richardson FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Ackerman ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PublicTrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PublicTrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. Page 1 Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 27, 2022 1.Approve Action Minutes of September 22, 2022 That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the action minutes of September 22, 2022. Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PublicTrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca .gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Receive a Presentation on Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update report. Recommendation: Agenda ReportAttachments: 3.Engineering and Traffic Survey Update That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance reaffirming and adjusting the speed limits identified in the Summary of Recommended Speed Limits . Recommendation: Agenda Report Summary of Recommended Speed Limits Willdan Engineering - 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey Attachments: DIVISION REPORT (Receive and File) 4.California Highway Patrol Report California Highway Patrol Report - September 2022Attachments: 5.Police Chief's Report Police Chief's Report - September 2022Attachments: 6.Fire Chief's Report Fire Chief's Report - September 2022Attachments: Page 2 Public / Traffic Safety Commission Agenda October 27, 2022 7.Traffic Engineer's Report Traffic Engineer's Report - September 2022Attachments: DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, November 24, 2022, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 Item No. 1 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC / TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Richardson FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Matics ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan (absent) PUBLIC COMMENTS – NON-AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the Commission: • Steve Castillo CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approve Action Minutes of September 22, 2022 Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of September 22, 2022. Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0; Sullivan absent): Motion by Carter, Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Sullivan absent. BUSINESS 2. De Portola Road Traffic Calming Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve the installation of VCalm Speed Advisory signs on De Portola Road. Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0; Sullivan absent): Motion by Ackerman, Second by Carter. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Sullivan absent. 3. Ynez Road at Quiet Meadow Road/Chantelle Court Striping Recommendation: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission approve maintaining the recently completed interim striping configuration. Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0; Sullivan absent): Motion by Ackerman, Second by Matics. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Sullivan absent. 2 DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File) 4. California Highway Patrol Report 5. Fire Chief’s Report 6. Police Chief’s Report DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT At 6:29 PM, the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, October 27, 2022, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James J. Richardson, Chairperson Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Item No. 2 PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Isaac Garibay, Director Human Resources & Risk Management DATE: October 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Receive a Presentation on Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update PREPARED BY: Mikel Alford, Emergency Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the Draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update report. BACKGROUND: The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Recovery Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) amended the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by placing a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning, primarily moving from post-disaster mitigation to pre-disaster mitigation. As part of DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is now responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Act requiring local government, state, and special jurisdictions to develop and maintain hazard mitigation plans. In order to qualify for future hazard mitigation grants, each jurisdiction must prepare, and have approved by the Federal Government a local hazard mitigation plan. A local hazard mitigation plan must be approved every five years per DMA 2000. While the County of Riverside is responsible for adopting the 2022 Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City of Temecula is responsible for providing a local annex to the County’s plan – more specifically, the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Riverside County's efforts to update the 2022 Riverside County Operational Area Multi- Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan began in mid-2022. The County’s goal was to bring all stakeholders of the Riverside County Operational Area (e.g., the County, cities, special districts local businesses, tribes, and the public) together to create a comprehensive and cohesive, multi- jurisdictional plan that identifies and assesses the hazards in the County of Riverside. The County of Riverside’s current planning process evaluates the potential impact of each identified hazard in the County, including those within city, special district, and tribal jurisdictions. All participating jurisdictions help establish a list of potential mitigation efforts via their LHMP Annex. Temecula will prioritize our project efforts based on the needs of our jurisdiction. In addition, Temecula will develop a specific hazard mitigation strategy based on information from 2017 through 2022. FEMA requires a formal resolution from the City adopting the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex as a part of the City's hazard planning process. The City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update kickoff is being presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission in preparation for City Council’s review and approval, then the plan will be submitted to FEMA for final approval before implementation. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: None. Item No. 3 1 PUBLIC TRAFFIC/SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Public/Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: October 27, 2022 SUBJECT: Engineering and Traffic Survey Update PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance reaffirming and adjusting the speed limits identified in the Summary of Recommended Speed Limits. BACKGROUND: The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires local authorities to review, reaffirm or adjust speed limits within their jurisdiction every seven (7) years based on an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey. The CVC also mandates that new speed limits be established based on an Engineering and Traffic Survey. The E&T survey provides the mechanism for the legal enforcement of the posted speed limit using radar or any other electronic speed- measuring device. As defined in the California Vehicle Code, an engineering and traffic survey is “a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.” The survey shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements, accident statistics, and highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. These characteristics are all considered when determining a reasonable and prudent posted speed limit. It should be noted that establishing a speed limit, which is not consistent with the 85th percentile speed, constitutes a “speed trap” and is not enforceable using radar or any other electronic speed- measuring device. Willdan Engineering conducted an E&T Survey on eleven (11) roadways, which included thirty- three (33) segments. The survey indicates that most existing speed limits do not require a change, and the recommended speed limits are consistent with the existing posted speed limits. There are, however, nine (9) segments where the existing posted speed limit is recommended to be adjusted. The segments are as follows:  Pechanga Parkway – Rainbow Canyon Road to Muirfield Drive 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Pechanga Parkway – Muirfield Drive to Loma Linda Road 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Pechanga Parkway – Loma Linda Road to Wolf Valley Road 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Pechanga Parkway – Casino Drive South to South City Limits 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Peppercorn Drive – Redhawk Parkway to Deer Hollow Way 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Solana Way – Margarita Road to Via Norte 45 MPH to 40 MPH 2  Winchester Road – Dendy Parkway to Fuller Road 45 MPH to 40 MPH  Winchester Road – Fuller Road to Diaz Road 50 MPH to 45 MPH  Winchester Road – Nicolas Road to East City Limits 55 MPH to 50 MPH The recommended posted speed limits conform to the requirements of the California Vehicle Code and the Caltrans MUTCD for establishing prudent posted speed limits that are consistent with roadway conditions, prevailing speeds, and more importantly, enforceable. Staff recommends the Commission approve a recommendation that the City Council adopt an Ordinance establishing the speed limits identified in Attachment 1 Summary of Recommendations. The public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission’s consideration of this issue through the agenda notification process. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available for installation of signs and pavement legends in the Public Works, Traffic Engineering Division’s Operating Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Summary of Recommended Speed Limits Willdan Engineering - 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey Summary of Recommended Speed Limits Name of Street Portion Affected Existing Speed Limit Proposed Speed Limit Del Rio Road Jefferson Avenue to Via Montezuma 35 35 Jedediah Smith Road Ynez Road De Portola Road to Margarita Road 40 40 Jefferson Avenue North City limits to Winchester Rd 40 40 Winchester Rd to Overland Dr 40 40 Overland Dr to Via Montezuma 40 40 Via Montezuma to Del Rio Rd 40 40 Del Rio Rd to Rancho California Rd 40 40 Leena Way Meadows Parkway to Campanula Way 40 40 Montelegro Way to Meadows Parkway 40 40 Pechanga Parkway Temecula Pkwy to Rainbow Canyon Rd 40 40 Rainbow Canyon Rd to Muirfield Dr 45 40 Muirfield Dr to Loma Linda Rd 45 40 Loma Linda Rd To Wolf Valley Rd 45 40 Wolf Valley Rd to Casino Dr South 40 40 Casino Dr South to South City Limits 45 40 Peppercorn Drive Redhawk Pkwy to Deer Hollow Way 45 40 Pujol Street First St to South Terminus 25 25 Roripaugh Road Winchester Rd to Nicolas Rd 25 25 Solana Way Ynez Road to Margarita Road 40 40 Margarita Road to Via Norte 45 40 Via Norte to Del Rey Road 40 40 Winchester Road Dendy Pkwy to Fuller Rd 45 40 Fuller Rd to Diaz Rd 50 45 Diaz Rd to Enterprise Cir 40 40 Enterprise Circle to Jefferson Ave 40 40 Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road 40 40 Ynez Rd to Promenade Mall West 40 40 Promenade Mall West to Promenade Mall East 40 40 Promenade Mall East to Margarita Rd 40 40 Margarita Rd to Roripaugh Rd 40 40 Roripaugh Rd to Nicolas Rd 50 50 Nicolas Rd to East City Limits 55 50 Wolf Creek Drive S Wolf Valley Rd to Pechanga Pkwy 35 35 Bold indicates speed limit changes. Engineering and Traffic Survey 2022 \2 SEPTEMBER October 13, 2022 Mr. Nick Minicilli, PE, TE Senior Civil Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey Dear Mr. Minicilli: As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey to justify and update the posted speed limits along 33 street segments in the City of Temecula. These segments were last surveyed in 2016 and require an update to comply with the 7- year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC). We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&T survey procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial a nd collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices. The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement. We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Temecula and the assistance and cooperation afforded to us during the course of this study. Very truly yours, WILLDAN Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E. Traffic Engineer Enclosure 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1-2 Elements of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ........................................ 2-3 SURVEY CONDITIONS ............................................................................... 4 Survey Locations ........................................................................................ 4 Data Collection ........................................................................................... 4 Speed Data ............................................................................................ 4 Collision Data ......................................................................................... 5 Field Review Data .................................................................................. 5 ANALYSIS ................................................................................................... 6 Criteria ........................................................................................................ 6 Results and Recommendations ................................................................. 6-7 Table 1-Street Segments With Recommended Speed Changes ............... 8 Table 2-Summary of Recommendations .................................................... 9-12 Segments with Special Conditions ............................................................. 13-14 LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................... 15 Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code .......................................... 15-20 APPENDIX A - Segment Data APPENDIX B - Radar Speed Distribution Forms - Raw Radar Speed Distribution Forms APPENDIX C - Survey Equipment Used 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 1 City of Temecula INTRODUCTION This Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Survey is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Temecula. This E&T Survey presents recommended speed limits for 33 street segments in the City of Temecula. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. These surveys must be updated every 7 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code (CVC). The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014. The survey was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s police officer(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to 14 years if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current. The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014 and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey: 1. Measurement of prevailing speed; 2. Accident history; and 3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist. Posted speed limits are established primarily to protect the general public from the reckless and unpredictable behavior of dangerous drivers. They provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 2 City of Temecula The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who dri ve the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually used to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers. Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion. Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement. ELEMENTS OF THE ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014 specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident histo ry and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&T Survey are discussed in more detail as follows: Speed Sampling Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85 th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. Therefore, a speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour (mph) increment to the 85th percentile speed, except as shown in the two options below. Options: 1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. 2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b). 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 3 City of Temecula If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5 The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria: A. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduce d by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. B. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS. C. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied. Collision History Reported collisions are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than average rate of collisions. A segment that has an above -average collision rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists. A summary of the collision rates for the 33 surveyed street segments is provided in Table 2. Conditions Not Readily Apparent To Motorists Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may no t be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. It is important to note that The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014 recommends exercising great care when establishing speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 4 City of Temecula SURVEY CONDITIONS SURVEY LOCATIONS The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Temecula. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following: 1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence. 2. Minimum visibility restrictions. 3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways. 4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle. DATA COLLECTION Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic collisions, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. Speed data and field reviews were conducted at 33 locations during the month of July 2022. Speed Data Radar speed measurements were conducted at 33 locations during the month of July 2022. The radar speed distribution forms are in Attachment B. All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 5 City of Temecula Collision Data Collision data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic collision database. For this study, collision data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021. The collision rates for the 33 segments are expressed in accidents per million vehicle miles (A/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the collision rate: xlxvyear daystx AxR 365 000,000,1= A = Number of midblock collisions over time period R = Collision Rate (accidents/million vehicle miles) t = Time Period Covered (in years) l = Length of Segment (miles) v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic) The segment collision rate was then compared to the average statewide collision rate. The average statewide collision rates were obtained from 2019 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans. Field Review Data A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors: 1. Street width and alignment (design speed); 2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; 3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns; 4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking; 5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices; 6. Visibility obstructions; 7. Land use and proximity to schools; 8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage; 9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and 10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 6 City of Temecula ANALYSIS CRITERIA Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (California MUTCD) dated November 2014. Some of the criteria used are: A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed. B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of s peeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed. C. The collision rate for each street segment is compared to average collision rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average collision rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Temecula. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of the available data and recommend a speed limit for each street segment surveyed. A complete summary of all recommendations is shown in Table 2. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a collision rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in this report. The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions. The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 7 City of Temecula speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (Section 22350 of CVC). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions. Table 1 identifies the street segments with recommended changes in posted speed limits and Table 2 summarizes the recommendations for all surveyed segments. TABLE 1 STREET SEGMENTS WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED CHANGES Street From To Existing New ChangeNo. Pechanga Parkway Rainbow Canyon Road Muirfield Drive 5404511- Pechanga Parkway Muirfield Drive Loma Linda Road 5404512- Pechanga Parkway Loma Linda Road Wolf Valley Road 5404513- Pechanga Parkway Casino Drive South South City Limits 5404515- Peppercorn Drive Redhawk Parkway Deer Hollow Way 5404516- Solana Way Margarita Road Via Norte 5404520- Winchester Road Dendy Parkway Fuller Drive 5404522- Winchester Road Fuller Drive Diaz Road 5455023- Winchester Road Nicolas Road East City Limits 5505532- 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula NP= Not Posted PL= Post Limit 8 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Street From To ADT Dist. (mi.) Collision Rate*** Exp. 85% Speed 10 mi. Pace % in PaceAct. Posted Speed Limit Rec. Speed Limit CommentsNo. Del Rio Road Jefferson Avenue Via Montezuma 1,396 351.60 25-340.000.53 63 Closest to 85th Speed35351% Jedediah Smith Road Ynez Road/ De Portola Road Margarita Road 2,506 431.60 33-420.001.1 61 California MUTCD Option 240402% Jefferson Avenue North City Limits Winchester Road 37,850 370.93 28-370.300.57 72 *40403% Jefferson Avenue Winchester Road Overland Drive 22,513 420.93 32-411.790.34 69 Closest to 85th Speed40404% Jefferson Avenue Overland Drive Via Montezuma 19,584 410.93 31-401.050.4 73 Closest to 85th Speed40405****% Jefferson Avenue Via Montezuma Del Rio Road 17,246 430.93 34-430.690.61 75 California MUTCD Option 240406% Jefferson Avenue Del Rio Road Rancho California Road 22,710 400.91 29-380.450.27 70 Closest to 85th Speed40407% Leena Way Meadows Parkway Campanula Way 619 401.60 32-410.000.43 79 Closest to 85th Speed40408% Leena Way Montelegro Way Meadows Parkway 1,528 371.60 28-370.000.27 87 *40409% Pechanga Parkway Temecula Parkway Rainbow Canyon Road 53,718 400.98 30-390.600.17 64 Closest to 85th Speed404010% 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments ** 25 mph when children are present 9 *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Collision Rate Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Street From To ADT Dist. (mi.) Collision Rate*** Exp. 85% Speed 10 mi. Pace % in PaceAct. Posted Speed Limit Rec. Speed Limit CommentsNo. Pechanga Parkway Rainbow Canyon Road Muirfield Drive 39,231 410.98 33-420.090.51 75 Closest to 85th Speed404511% Pechanga Parkway Muirfield Drive Loma Linda Road 48,640 421.60 32-410.000.14 70 Closest to 85th Speed404512% Pechanga Parkway Loma Linda Road Wolf Valley Road 33,553 441.60 33-420.110.77 70 California MUTCD Option 2404513****% Pechanga Parkway Wolf Valley Road Casino Drive South 32,202 420.91 33-420.090.33 86 Closest to 85th Speed404014% Pechanga Parkway Casino Drive South South City Limits 13,591 390.91 31-400.170.8 78 Closest to 85th Speed404515****% Peppercorn Drive Redhawk Parkway Deer Hollow Way 8,044 400.93 31-400.000.33 80 Closest to 85th Speed404516% Pujol Street First Street South Terminus 1,317 321.60 21-304.950.28 76 *252517% Roripaugh Road Winchester Road Nicolas Road 2,182 271.60 18-270.610.69 83 Closest to 85th Speed252518% Solana Way Ynez Road Margarita Road 11,418 350.91 26-350.000.3 84 *404019% Solana Way Margarita Road Via Norte 3,724 391.60 31-400.000.53 77 Closest to 85th Speed404520% 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments ** 25 mph when children are present 10 *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Collision Rate Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Street From To ADT Dist. (mi.) Collision Rate*** Exp. 85% Speed 10 mi. Pace % in PaceAct. Posted Speed Limit Rec. Speed Limit CommentsNo. Solana Way Via Norte Del Rey Road 1,733 391.60 31-400.980.54 86 Closest to 85th Speed404021****% Winchester Road Dendy Parkway Fuller Drive 1,539 400.93 26-350.000.69 53 Closest to 85th Speed404522% Winchester Road Fuller Drive Diaz Road 5,654 480.93 40-490.660.49 56 California MUTCD Option 2455023% Winchester Road Diaz Road Enterprise Circle 21,585 370.93 28-371.630.13 76 *404024% Winchester Road Enterprise Circle Jefferson Avenue 27,000 390.98 30-390.400.34 76 Closest to 85th Speed404025% Winchester Road Jefferson Avenue Ynez Road 61,219 370.41 28-370.750.36 67 *404026% Winchester Road Ynez Road Promenade Mall West 45,245 400.98 32-410.870.21 70 Closest to 85th Speed404027% Winchester Road Promenade Mall West Promenade Mall East 47,270 380.98 29-380.190.2 79 Closest to 85th Speed404028% Winchester Road Promenade Mall East Margarita Road 46,614 380.98 29-380.490.2 79 Closest to 85th Speed404029% Winchester Road Margarita Road Roripaugh Road 49,243 400.98 29-380.590.22 74 Closest to 85th Speed404030% 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments ** 25 mph when children are present 11 *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Collision Rate Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Street From To ADT Dist. (mi.) Collision Rate*** Exp. 85% Speed 10 mi. Pace % in PaceAct. Posted Speed Limit Rec. Speed Limit CommentsNo. Winchester Road Roripaugh Road Nicolas Road 50,478 490.98 40-490.160.44 70 Closest to 85th Speed505031% Winchester Road Nicolas Road East City Limits 53,459 490.98 41-500.180.75 76 Closest to 85th Speed505532% Wolf Creek Drive South Wolf Valley Road Pechanga Parkway 4,340 361.8 27-360.000.91 87 Closest to 85th Speed353533% 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula * See "Segments with Special Conditions" Section for Comments ** 25 mph when children are present 12 *** Accident rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles Act.: Actual Collision Rate Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 13 City of Temecula SEGMENTS WITH SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more below the critical speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver. Each segment is discussed below. Segment #3 – Jefferson Avenue – North City Limits to Winchester Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes with bike lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 37,850 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the 0.57-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #9 – Leena Way – Montelegro Way to Meadows Parkway This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has one through lane in each direction undivided with an ADT of 1,528 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.27-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #17 – Pujol Street – First Street to South Terminus This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has 1 through lane in each direction undivided with an ADT of 1,317 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.28-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, a high collision rate and vertical curves causing poor visibility that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 25 mph for the above reasons. Segment #19 – Solana Way – Ynez Road to Margarita Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 11,418 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the 0.30-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 14 City of Temecula Segment #24 – Winchester Road – Diaz Road to Enterprise Circle This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 21,585 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial and industrial along the 0.13-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. Segment #26 – Winchester Road – Ynez Road to Promenade Mall West This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has three through lanes in each direction undivided with an ADT of 61,219 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the 0.36-mile-long segment. The critical speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, to maintain uniformity between adjacent street segments, a higher speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 40 mph for the above reasons. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 15 City of Temecula LEGISLATIVE REFERENCES APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code: Section 627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities. (b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following: (1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records. (3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following: (1) Residential density, if any of the following conditio ns exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous there to, other than a business district: a. Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more se parate dwelling houses of business structures. b. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. c. The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or bus iness structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Section 21400. (b) The Department of Transportation shall revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on January 1, 2012, to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour incremen t, but then the Department o f Transportation or a local authority shall not reduce the speed limit any further for any reason. Basic Speed Law 22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway a t a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 16 City of Temecula Speed Law Violations Section 22351. (a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law. (b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said li mits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing. Prima Facie Speed Limits Section 22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unles s changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof: (a) Fifteen miles per hour: (1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a cl ear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the inte rsection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley. (b) Twenty-five miles per hour: (1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code. (2) When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The pri ma facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL" w arning sign. For purposes of this 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 17 City of Temecula subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL " warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds . (3) When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a s treet other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Pedestrian Safety Account pursuant to Section 894.7 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources. Increase of Local Spee d Limits to 65 Miles Per Hour Section 22357. (a) Whenever a local authority d etermines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25 mile per hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facili ty primarily used by senior citizens. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366. Downward Speed Zoning Section 22358.5. It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Sec tion 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions. Boundary Line Streets Section 22359. With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions. Speed Trap Prohibition 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 18 City of Temecula Section 40801. No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of th is code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed o f any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code. Speed Trap Section 40802. (a) A "speed trap" is either of the following: (1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subpara graph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of mo ving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. (b)(1) For purposes o f this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by t he Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. When a street or road does not appear on the “California Road System Maps,” it may be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting resi dential property and meets the following three conditions: (A) Roadway width o f not more than 40 feet. (B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction. (2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. (c)(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable: (A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully complete d a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 19 City of Temecula course was approved and certified by the Commission o n Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training cou rse of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (C)(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey ha s been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the req uirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406. (D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operat ional standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2) A “speed trap” is either of the following: (A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects: (I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone . Speed Trap Evidence Section 40803. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey 20 City of Temecula (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evide nce is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802. (c) When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Sec tion 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Sect ion 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802. 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula APPENDIX A Street Segment Data ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 1 STREET Del Rio Road FROM Jefferson Avenue TO Via Montezuma Average Daily Traffic 1,396 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:23 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 85th Percentile Speed 35 10 mph Pace Speed 25-34 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 63 Posted Speed Limit 35 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ JEFFERSON Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic NONE Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Length of Segment 0.530 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?NONE Driveways?EAST SIDE ONLY Lighting NONE Width 47 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 30 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 2 STREET Jedediah Smith Road FROM Ynez Road/ De Portola Road TO Margarita Road Average Daily Traffic 2,506 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2022 Time of Speed Survey 13:29 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 85th Percentile Speed 43 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 LANES (NO STRIPING) Type of Traffic Control STOP @ YNEZ Crosswalks?NONE Pedestrian Traffic NONE Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Length of Segment 1.100 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions POOR Sidewalks?NONE Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting NONE Width 31 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 38 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 3 STREET Jefferson Avenue FROM North City Limits TO Winchester Road Average Daily Traffic 37,850 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:58 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 85th Percentile Speed 37 10 mph Pace Speed 28-37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 7 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.30 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES + LEFT TURN LANE (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WINCHESTER, SANBORN Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.570 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 33 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 4 STREET Jefferson Avenue FROM Winchester Road TO Overland Drive Average Daily Traffic 22,513 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:32 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 85th Percentile Speed 42 10 mph Pace Speed 32-41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 15 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.79 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WINCHESTER, OVERLAND Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.340 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 37 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 5 STREET Jefferson Avenue FROM Overland Drive TO Via Montezuma Average Daily Traffic 19,584 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:13 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 85th Percentile Speed 41 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 9 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.05 Number of Lanes 4 + LEFT TURN LANE (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ OVERLAND, VIA MONTEZUMA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.400 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting @ T.S. ONLY Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 36 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 6 STREET Jefferson Avenue FROM Via Montezuma TO Del Rio Road Average Daily Traffic 17,246 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 10:52 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)38 85th Percentile Speed 43 10 mph Pace Speed 34-43 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 8 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.69 Number of Lanes 4 + LEFT TURN LANE (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ VIA MONTEZUMA, DEL RIO Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.610 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES - SCATTERED Driveways?WEST SIDE ONLY Lighting @ T.S. ONLY Width 78 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 38 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 7 STREET Jefferson Avenue FROM Del Rio Road TO Rancho California Road Average Daily Traffic 22,710 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:00 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 3 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.45 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DEL RIO, RANCHO CALIFORNIA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.270 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting EAST SIDE ONLY Width 78 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 36 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 8 STREET Leena Way FROM Meadows Parkway TO Campanula Way Average Daily Traffic 619 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:55 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 32-41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 + BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MEADOWS, STOP @ CAMPANULA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.430 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 43 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 63 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 36 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 9 STREET Leena Way FROM Montelegro Way TO Meadows Parkway Average Daily Traffic 1,528 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:59 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 85th Percentile Speed 37 10 mph Pace Speed 28-37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 LANES (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MEADOWS, STOP @ MONTELEGRO Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.270 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 43 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 107 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 33 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 10 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Temecula Parkway TO Rainbow Canyon Road Average Daily Traffic 53,718 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:24 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 64 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 6 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.60 Number of Lanes 6 LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ TEMECULA & RAINBOW CANYON Crosswalks?@T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.170 Vertical Curve?NONE Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?EAST SIDE ONLY Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 86 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 34 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 11 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Rainbow Canyon Road TO Muirfield Drive Average Daily Traffic 39,231 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 11:45 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 85th Percentile Speed 41 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 2 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.09 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ RAINBOW CANYON & MUIRFIELD Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.510 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions FAIR Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 105 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 37 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 12 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Muirfield Drive TO Loma Linda Road Average Daily Traffic 48,640 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 12:10 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 85th Percentile Speed 42 10 mph Pace Speed 32-41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MUIRFIELD & LOMA LINDA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.140 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 108 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 37 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 13 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Loma Linda Road TO Wolf Valley Road Average Daily Traffic 33,553 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 12:34 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)39 85th Percentile Speed 44 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 3 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.11 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ LOMA LINDA, WOLF CREEK & WOLF VALLEY Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.770 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 108 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 39 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 14 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Wolf Valley Road TO Casino Drive South Average Daily Traffic 32,202 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 13:04 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)38 85th Percentile Speed 42 10 mph Pace Speed 33-42 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 1 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.09 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WOLF VALLEY, N CASINO & S CASINO Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.330 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 88 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, CASINO Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 38 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 15 STREET Pechanga Parkway FROM Casino Drive South TO South City Limits Average Daily Traffic 13,591 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 13:28 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 85th Percentile Speed 39 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 78 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 2 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.17 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES ON EAST SIDE (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ S CASINO, PECHANGA RESORT, WOLF CREEK & DEER HOLLOW Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.800 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?WEST SIDE ONLY Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 86 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL, CASINO Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 36 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 16 STREET Peppercorn Drive FROM Redhawk Parkway TO Deer Hollow Way Average Daily Traffic 8,044 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:00 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 4 + BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ REDHAWK & DEER HOLLOW Crosswalks?@ T.S., UNCONTROLLED X-WALK @ VIA PLATA Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.330 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 63 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, SCHOOL, GOLF COURSE Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 35 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 17 STREET Pujol Street FROM First Street TO South Terminus Average Daily Traffic 1,317 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/21/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:57 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 85th Percentile Speed 32 10 mph Pace Speed 21-30 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Posted Speed Limit 25 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 2 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 4.95 Number of Lanes 2 LANES Type of Traffic Control NONE Crosswalks?NONE Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Length of Segment 0.280 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 37 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARK, CHURCH Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 105 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 25 COLLISION RATE mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 28 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 18 STREET Roripaugh Road FROM Winchester Road TO Nicolas Road Average Daily Traffic 2,182 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 12:25 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)23 85th Percentile Speed 27 10 mph Pace Speed 18-27 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83 Posted Speed Limit 25 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 1 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.61 Number of Lanes 2 + BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. WINCHESTER, STOP @ SWALLOW & NICOLAS Crosswalks?@ T.S., @ SWALLOW STOP Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking NEARBY PARK LOCATIONS - FEW Length of Segment 0.690 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 43 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, PARKS Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 25 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 23 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 19 STREET Solana Way FROM Ynez Road TO Margarita Road Average Daily Traffic 11,418 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:01 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)31 85th Percentile Speed 35 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.91 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 4 LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ YNEZ & MARGARITA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic NONE Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.300 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions FAIR Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting NONE Width 70 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 31 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 20 STREET Solana Way FROM Margarita Road TO Via Norte Average Daily Traffic 3,724 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 9:43 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 39 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 + BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MARGARITA, STOP @ VIA NORTE Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking SOUTH SIDE - VERY FEW Length of Segment 0.530 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?SOUTH SIDE - FEW Lighting NORTH SIDE Width 60 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 35 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 21 STREET Solana Way FROM Via Norte TO Del Rey Road Average Daily Traffic 1,733 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 10:56 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35 85th Percentile Speed 39 10 mph Pace Speed 31-40 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 1 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.60 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.98 Number of Lanes 2 + BIKE LANES Type of Traffic Control STOP @ VIA NORTE, DEL REY Crosswalks?NONE Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic LIGHT On-Street Parking BOTH SIDES Length of Segment 0.540 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?SOUTH SIDE Driveways?NORTH SIDE - VERY FEW Lighting SOUTH SIDE Width 43 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 122 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 36 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 22 STREET Winchester Road FROM Dendy Parkway TO Fuller Drive Average Daily Traffic 1,539 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 12:42 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 26-35 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 53 Posted Speed Limit 45 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 4 + LEFT TURN LANE (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control STOP @ REMINGTON Crosswalks?NONE Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.690 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 76 Adjacent Land Use INDUSTRIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 32 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 23 STREET Winchester Road FROM Fuller Drive TO Diaz Road Average Daily Traffic 5,654 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 13:54 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)42 85th Percentile Speed 48 10 mph Pace Speed 40-49 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56 Posted Speed Limit 50 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 2 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.66 Number of Lanes 4 + LEFT TURN LANE (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DIAZ Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.490 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 45 CALIFORNIA MUTCD OPTION 2 mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 42 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 24 STREET Winchester Road FROM Diaz Road TO Enterprise Circle Average Daily Traffic 21,585 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:34 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 85th Percentile Speed 37 10 mph Pace Speed 28-37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 5 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.93 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 1.63 Number of Lanes 4 + LEFT TURN LANE Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ DIAZ & ENTERPRISE CIRCLE Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.130 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NONE Lighting NORTH SIDE ONLY Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, INDUSTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 MAINTAINS UNIFORMITY mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 33 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 25 STREET Winchester Road FROM Enterprise Circle TO Jefferson Avenue Average Daily Traffic 27,000 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:56 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 39 10 mph Pace Speed 30-39 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 4 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.40 Number of Lanes 5 + LEFT TURN LANE (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ JEFFERSON & ENTERPRISE CIRCLE Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.340 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions FAIR Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES - SPARSED Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting SOUTH SIDE ONLY Width 76 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 34 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 26 STREET Winchester Road FROM Jefferson Avenue TO Ynez Road Average Daily Traffic 61,219 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/27/2022 Time of Speed Survey 15:18 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32 85th Percentile Speed 37 10 mph Pace Speed 28-37 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 18 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.41 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.75 Number of Lanes 6 LANES Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ JEFFERSON, I-15 NB RAMPS, I-15 SB RAMPS & YNEZ Crosswalks?@ JEFFERSON & YNEZ Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.360 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions FAIR Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?NORTH SIDE Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 122 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 32 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 27 STREET Winchester Road FROM Ynez Road TO Promenade Mall West Average Daily Traffic 45,245 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 15:47 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 32-41 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 9 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.87 Number of Lanes 8 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ YNEZ & PROMENADE MALL W Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.210 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 130 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 35 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 28 STREET Winchester Road FROM Promenade Mall West TO Promenade Mall East Average Daily Traffic 47,270 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 15:22 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 38 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 2 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.19 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ PROMENADE MALL W & PROMENADE MALL E Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.200 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?NO Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 110 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 34 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 29 STREET Winchester Road FROM Promenade Mall East TO Margarita Road Average Daily Traffic 46,614 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 15:01 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 38 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 5 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.49 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES ON SOUTH SIDE (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ PROMENADE MALL E & MARGARITA Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.200 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 110 Adjacent Land Use COMMERICAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 34 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 30 STREET Winchester Road FROM Margarita Road TO Roripaugh Road Average Daily Traffic 49,243 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:38 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)34 85th Percentile Speed 40 10 mph Pace Speed 29-38 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 Posted Speed Limit 40 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 7 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.59 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANE ON SOUTH SIDE (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ MARGARITA & RORIPAUGH Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic LIGHT Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.220 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 110 Adjacent Land Use COMMERICAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 40 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 34 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 31 STREET Winchester Road FROM Roripaugh Road TO Nicolas Road Average Daily Traffic 50,478 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:16 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)43 85th Percentile Speed 49 10 mph Pace Speed 40-49 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70 Posted Speed Limit 50 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 4 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.16 Number of Lanes 6 + BIKE LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ RORIPAUGH & NICOLAS Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.440 Vertical Curve?YES Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?EAST SIDE ONLY Lighting SOUTH SIDE ONLY Width 110 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, SCHOOL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 50 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 44 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 32 STREET Winchester Road FROM Nicolas Road TO East City Limits Average Daily Traffic 53,459 Date Counted 7/27/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/26/2022 Time of Speed Survey 13:55 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)45 85th Percentile Speed 49 10 mph Pace Speed 41-50 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76 Posted Speed Limit 55 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 8 Statewide Average Collision Rate 0.98 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.18 Number of Lanes 6 LANES (RAISED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ NICOLAS & WINCHESTER CREEK Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic MODERATE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.750 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility GOOD Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting WEST SIDE ONLY Width 110 Adjacent Land Use COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 200 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 50 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 45 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY CITY OF TEMECULA 33 STREET Wolf Creek Drive South FROM Wolf Valley Road TO Pechanga Parkway Average Daily Traffic 4,340 Date Counted 7/21/2022 Date of Speed Survey 7/20/2022 Time of Speed Survey 14:09 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32 85th Percentile Speed 36 10 mph Pace Speed 27-36 Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87 Posted Speed Limit 35 Number of Years Studied 3 Total Collisions 0 Statewide Average Collision Rate 1.8 Collisions per Million Vehicle Miles 0.00 Number of Lanes 2 LANES (PAINTED MEDIAN) Type of Traffic Control T.S. @ WOLF VALLEY & PECHANGA, STOP @ TETON & FIRESIDE Crosswalks?@ T.S. Pedestrian Traffic MODERATE Truck Traffic NONE On-Street Parking NONE Length of Segment 0.910 Vertical Curve?NO Horizontal Curve?YES Visibility FAIR Roadway Conditions GOOD Sidewalks?BOTH SIDES Driveways?BOTH SIDES Lighting BOTH SIDES Width 46 Adjacent Land Use RESIDENTIAL, CHURCH, PARK Field Study By MB Checked By NS CERTIFICATION DATE 9/21/2022 Number of Survey Samples 119 SPEED FACTORS mph mph COLLISION HISTORY TRAFFIC FACTORS ROADWAY FACTORS CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Temecula was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number TE 2933 Collisions/MVM years feet miles Recommended Speed Limit 35 CLOSEST TO 85TH SPEED mph Speed Justification mph Average Speed 32 mph Collisions/MVM 9/21/2022 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula APPENDIX B Radar Speed Distribution Forms DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:23AM 10:50AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):JEFFERSON AVE AND VIA MONTEZUMA 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:28030 DEL RIO RD 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 X 1 0 1 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 X 0 1 1 46 0 0 0 45 X 1 0 1 44 0 0 0 43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X 1 2 3 41 X X 2 0 2 40 X X 1 1 2 85TH %:36 35 35 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 3 1 4 38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %:29 28 29 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 36 X X X 1 2 3 15TH %:24 23 24 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12 *10 MPH PACE:26 - 35 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 * 32 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 P % IN PACE:62%65%63% 31 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 C % OVER PACE:16%16%19% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 *% UNDER PACE:22%19%19% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 13 19 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:30 29 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 24 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 SAMPLE VARIANCE:39 34 37 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 22 X X X 1 2 3 STANDARD DEVIATION:6 6 6 M.P.H. 21 X X X X 2 2 4 20 X X X X 3 1 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.39 0.34 0.18 19 X X 0 2 2 18 X 0 1 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.63 0.58 0.43 M.P.H. 17 X X 1 1 2 16 X 0 1 1 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO DEL RIO ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/21/22 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:1:29PM 2:47PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):YNEZ RD-DE PORTOLA RD AND MARGARITA RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:30655 JEDEDIAH SMITH RD 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 X X 1 1 2 51 X 0 1 1 50 0 0 0 49 X X 1 1 2 48 X X 1 1 2 47 X X X 0 3 3 46 X X X X X 3 2 5 45 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 44 X X X X X 0 5 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 40 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 85TH %:42 44 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 50TH %:36 38 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 15TH %:31 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 * 34 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 35 - 44 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 P % IN PACE:69%60%61% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 C % OVER PACE:21%14%19% 29 X X X X 3 1 4 E 28 X 0 1 1 *% UNDER PACE:10%26%21% 27 X X X 0 3 3 * 26 X X 1 1 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 38 38 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:28 33 31 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 6 6 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.28 0.33 0.15 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.52 0.57 0.39 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:58AM 12:37PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):NORTH CITY LIMIT AND WINCHESTER RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:27309 JEFFERSON AVE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 1 0 1 41 0 0 0 40 X X X X X X 2 4 6 85TH %:37 38 37 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 9 12 38 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 50TH %:32 34 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 15TH %:27 28 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 *10 MPH PACE:28 - 37 30 - 39 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 P % IN PACE:73%74%72% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 C % OVER PACE:10%4%15% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 *% UNDER PACE:17%22%13% 27 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 * 26 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:32 33 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X 6 1 7 24 X X 1 1 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:19 18 19 23 X 0 1 1 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.18 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.42 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEFFERSON AVENUE CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:32AM 11:52AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WINCHESTER RD AND OVERLAND DR 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:27560 JEFFERSON AVE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 X X X 2 1 3 47 X X X X X 3 2 5 46 X X X 2 1 3 45 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 44 X X 2 0 2 43 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 41 X X X X X X 4 2 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17 85TH %:43 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 50TH %:38 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 36 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 15TH %:33 31 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 *10 MPH PACE:34 - 43 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 P % IN PACE:70%70%69% 31 X X X 1 2 3 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE:14%14%19% 29 X X X X 2 2 4 E 28 X X X 2 1 3 *% UNDER PACE:16%16%13% 27 X X X 0 3 3 * 26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:38 36 37 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:23 24 24 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.24 0.12 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.49 0.35 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEFFERSON AVENUE CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:13AM 11:28AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):OVERLAND DR AND VIA MONTEZUMA 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:27710 JEFFERSON AVE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X X 0 2 2 49 X 0 1 1 48 X 0 1 1 47 X 0 1 1 46 X X 0 2 2 45 X X X X 1 3 4 44 X X X 2 1 3 43 X X X X X X 4 2 6 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 41 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 40 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 85TH %:40 42 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %:35 37 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 15TH %:30 33 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 33 - 42 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 P % IN PACE:73%76%73% 31 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 C % OVER PACE:19%13%18% 29 X 0 1 1 E 28 X X X 3 0 3 *% UNDER PACE:8%11%10% 27 X X 2 0 2 * 26 X X X 2 1 3 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:35 37 36 M.P.H. 25 X 1 0 1 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:21 22 22 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.21 0.22 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.47 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEFFERSON AVENUE CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:10:52AM 11:10AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VIA MONTEZUMA AND DEL RIO RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:28093 JEFFERSON AVE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X 1 0 1 49 X 1 0 1 48 X X 2 0 2 47 X X X X X X 5 1 6 46 X X 2 0 2 45 X X X X 2 2 4 44 X X X X 1 3 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 85TH %:43 42 43 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17 50TH %:38 37 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 15TH %:34 33 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *10 MPH PACE:34 - 43 33 - 42 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE:75%76%75% 31 X X X X X X 2 4 6 A 30 X X X 0 3 3 C % OVER PACE:14%11%10% 29 X 0 1 1 E 28 X X 1 1 2 *% UNDER PACE:11%13%15% 27 X X 1 1 2 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:39 37 38 M.P.H. 25 X 1 0 1 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:23 18 21 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 4 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.18 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.43 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEFFERSON AVENUE CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:18AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):DEL RIO RD AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:28165 JEFFERSON AVE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 X 1 0 1 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 X 0 1 1 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 X 0 1 1 50 X 0 1 1 49 X 1 0 1 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 X X 0 2 2 45 X X X 0 3 3 44 X X X 1 2 3 43 X X X 1 2 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X 0 5 5 41 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 12 15 85TH %:38 42 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X 2 3 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 50TH %:33 37 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 15TH %:30 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 9 2 11 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 32 - 41 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 P % IN PACE:81%66%70% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 6 19 C % OVER PACE:11%18%25% 29 X X X X X X 4 2 6 E 28 X X X X X 5 0 5 *% UNDER PACE:8%16%5% 27 X X X X 2 2 4 * 26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 37 36 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:23 30 29 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.30 0.15 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.54 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO JEFFERSON AVENUE CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/21/22 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:55AM 11:55AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MEADOWS PKWY AND CAMPANULA WAY 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:ABETO WAY/LEENA WAY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X 0 1 1 44 0 0 0 43 X 0 1 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X 2 1 3 41 X X 1 1 2 40 X X X X 3 1 4 85TH %:40 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 4 0 4 38 0 0 0 50TH %:36 35 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 36 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 15TH %:33 28 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 * 34 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *10 MPH PACE:33 - 42 28 - 37 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 4 0 4 * 32 X X X X 1 3 4 P % IN PACE:94%79%79% 31 X X 1 1 2 A 30 X X 0 2 2 C % OVER PACE:0%18%8% 29 0 0 0 E 28 X X X 0 3 3 *% UNDER PACE:6%4%13% 27 X 0 1 1 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 35 36 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:8 22 15 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 5 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.79 0.23 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.89 0.48 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 35 28 63 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO LEENA WAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/21/22 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:11:59AM 1:21PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MONTENEGRO WAY AND MEADOWS PKWY 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:VIZ RAZO/LEENA WAY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X 0 1 1 41 X 0 1 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %:35 37 37 M.P.H. 39 X X X 0 3 3 38 X X X 1 2 3 50TH %:31 34 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 36 X X X X X X 2 4 6 15TH %:28 31 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 * 34 X X X X X X X X X 2 7 9 *10 MPH PACE:28 - 37 30 - 39 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 P % IN PACE:88%91%87% 31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 C % OVER PACE:2%5%8% 29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E 28 X X X X 4 0 4 *% UNDER PACE:10%4%5% 27 X X 2 0 2 * 26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:31 34 33 M.P.H. 25 X 1 0 1 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:10 9 12 23 X 1 0 1 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.19 0.16 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.44 0.39 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 51 56 107 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO LEENA WAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:24AM 11:43AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):TEMECULA PKWY AND RAINBOW CANYON RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PECHANGA PKWY/CUPENO LN 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X 0 1 1 49 0 0 0 48 X 0 1 1 47 0 0 0 46 X 1 0 1 45 X 0 1 1 44 0 0 0 43 X X X X 3 1 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 41 X X X X X 2 3 5 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 85TH %:40 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 50TH %:33 34 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 15TH %:28 29 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *10 MPH PACE:26 - 35 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 P % IN PACE:62%67%64% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 C % OVER PACE:37%17%17% 29 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 *% UNDER PACE:1%16%20% 27 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 35 34 M.P.H. 25 X 0 1 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:26 26 26 23 X 1 0 1 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.26 0.26 0.13 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.51 0.51 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:11:45AM 12:02PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):RAINBOW CANYON AND MUIRFIELD DR 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PECHANGA PKWY/CLUBHOUSE DR 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X 0 1 1 49 X X 0 2 2 48 X X 0 2 2 47 X X X 1 2 3 46 X X 1 1 2 45 X X 1 1 2 44 X 0 1 1 43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 41 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 85TH %:40 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 50TH %:36 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 15TH %:30 33 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 *10 MPH PACE:33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 P % IN PACE:72%77%75% 31 X X X X X 2 3 5 A 30 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 C % OVER PACE:5%10%8% 29 X X 1 1 2 E 28 X X X X X X 4 2 6 *% UNDER PACE:23%13%18% 27 X X X 2 1 3 * 26 X X X 3 0 3 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 37 37 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:21 23 22 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.21 0.23 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.46 0.48 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:10PM 12:27PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MUIRFIELD DR AND LOMA LINDA RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DRIVEWAY NORTH OF BUS STOP ON EAST SIDE OF PECHANGA PKWY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X 0 1 1 49 X 1 0 1 48 X X 1 1 2 47 X X 0 2 2 46 X X X 1 2 3 45 X X X 0 3 3 44 X X X X 3 1 4 43 X X X X X 1 4 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 85TH %:41 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 50TH %:35 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 15TH %:30 33 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 P % IN PACE:69%73%70% 31 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 C % OVER PACE:16%14%16% 29 X X X X X 4 1 5 E 28 X X X X 4 0 4 *% UNDER PACE:15%13%15% 27 X 1 0 1 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 38 37 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:23 20 22 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.23 0.20 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.48 0.45 0.34 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:34PM 12:56PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):LOMA LINDA RD AND WOLF VALLEY RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PECHANGA PKWY/VIA GILBERTO 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 X 1 0 1 51 X 0 1 1 50 0 0 0 49 X 0 1 1 48 X X X X X 4 1 5 47 X X X X 3 1 4 46 X X X X X 3 2 5 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 44 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 43 X X X X X X X X X 7 2 9 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 85TH %:45 44 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 50TH %:39 39 39 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 15TH %:34 33 34 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * 34 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *10 MPH PACE:35 - 44 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12 * 32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE:69%73%70% 31 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 A 30 X X X X 1 3 4 C % OVER PACE:16%18%23% 29 0 0 0 E 28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:15%9%8% 27 0 0 0 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:39 39 39 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:24 21 22 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.24 0.21 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.45 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:1:04PM 1:25PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WOLF VALLEY RD AND CASINO DR SOUTH 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PECHANGA PKWY/NORTH CASINO DR 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 X 1 0 1 46 X X 0 2 2 45 X X 0 2 2 44 X X X X 2 2 4 43 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 85TH %:41 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 50TH %:38 38 38 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 7 19 15TH %:34 34 34 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *10 MPH PACE:33 - 42 33 - 42 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 32 X X X X X X 2 4 6 P % IN PACE:87%84%86% 31 X X X 1 2 3 A 30 X X 2 0 2 C % OVER PACE:7%10%9% 29 X 1 0 1 E 28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:6%6%6% 27 0 0 0 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:38 38 38 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:11 13 12 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 4 3 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.11 0.13 0.06 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.34 0.36 0.25 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:1:28PM 1:59PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):CASINO DR SOUTH AND SOUTH CITY LIMITS 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:GREAT OAK MARKETPLACE PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X X X 3 0 3 44 X X X X 3 1 4 43 X X X X X 4 1 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X 3 1 4 41 X X X X X 4 1 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 85TH %:41 39 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21 50TH %:37 35 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 15TH %:33 30 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 11 22 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 30 - 39 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 * 32 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 P % IN PACE:79%80%78% 31 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 A 30 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 C % OVER PACE:17%7%11% 29 X X X X X 1 4 5 E 28 X X X X 2 2 4 *% UNDER PACE:4%13%12% 27 X X X 0 3 3 * 26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:37 35 36 M.P.H. 25 X X 0 2 2 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:15 17 17 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.15 0.17 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.39 0.41 0.29 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PECHANGA PARKWAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/21/22 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:9:00AM 9:40AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):REDHAWK PKWY AND DEER HOLLOW DR 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PEPPERCORN DR/CORTE BARELLA 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:45 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X 0 1 1 44 X X X X X X 2 4 6 43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 2 9 11 41 X 0 1 1 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 11 16 85TH %:38 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X 0 8 8 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 50TH %:34 37 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 12 16 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 15TH %:30 33 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 6 18 P % IN PACE:85%83%80% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 A 30 X X X X X X 6 0 6 C % OVER PACE:10%15%10% 29 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 E 28 X X X X 4 0 4 *% UNDER PACE:5%2%10% 27 X 0 1 1 * 26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 37 35 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:15 14 16 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.15 0.14 0.08 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.38 0.38 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PEPPERCORN DRIVE CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/21/22 DAY:Thursday TIME PERIOD:2:57PM 4:13PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):FIRST ST AND SOUTH TERMINUS 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:30 MPH OBSERVER: 60 X 0 1 1 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X 0 1 1 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0 41 X 0 1 1 40 X 0 1 1 85TH %:31 33 32 M.P.H. 39 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %:26 27 27 M.P.H. 37 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %:24 22 23 M.P.H. 35 X X X 3 0 3 * 34 X X 1 1 2 *10 MPH PACE:24 - 33 21 - 30 21 - 30 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X 2 4 6 * 32 X X X X X 2 3 5 P % IN PACE:79%74%76% 31 X X X 2 1 3 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 C % OVER PACE:8%25%22% 29 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 E 28 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 *% UNDER PACE:13%2%2% 27 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:27 28 28 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 24 X X X X X X X X X X 8 2 10 SAMPLE VARIANCE:15 46 31 23 X X X X X X 2 4 6 22 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 7 6 M.P.H. 21 X X X X 2 2 4 20 X 1 0 1 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.29 0.88 0.29 19 X 0 1 1 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.53 0.94 0.54 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 52 53 105 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO PUJOL STREET CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:12:25PM 1:47PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WINCHESTER RD AND NICOLAS RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:RORIPAUGH RD/SENNA CT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:25 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 85TH %:28 24 27 M.P.H. 39 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 50TH %:25 21 23 M.P.H. 37 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 15TH %:21 18 19 M.P.H. 35 0 0 0 * 34 X X 2 0 2 *10 MPH PACE:19 - 28 17 - 26 18 - 27 M.P.H. 33 0 0 0 * 32 X 1 0 1 P % IN PACE:84%94%83% 31 X X X X 4 0 4 A 30 X X X 3 0 3 C % OVER PACE:13%3%12% 29 X X X X 3 1 4 E 28 X X X X X X X X X 8 1 9 *% UNDER PACE:3%3%6% 27 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:25 21 23 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 5 19 24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 SAMPLE VARIANCE:14 9 14 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 3 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 13 20 20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 13 17 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.14 0.09 0.07 19 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 18 X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 10 12 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.37 0.30 0.26 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X 0 7 7 16 X X X 0 3 3 15 X 1 0 1 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO RORIPAUGH ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:01AM 9:38AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):YNEZ RD AND MARGARITA RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:MOTOR CAR PKWY/SOLANA WAY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 X 1 0 1 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 0 41 X X X 3 0 3 40 X X 2 0 2 85TH %:36 34 35 M.P.H. 39 X X X X 3 1 4 38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %:32 30 31 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X 3 2 5 36 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 15TH %:28 27 27 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 P % IN PACE:79%91%84% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 10 19 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 13 21 C % OVER PACE:14%7%14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 *% UNDER PACE:7%2%3% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 * 26 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:32 30 31 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 4 1 5 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:17 10 14 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 3 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.17 0.10 0.07 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.31 0.27 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO SOLANA WAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:9:43AM 10:53AM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MARGARITA RD AND VIA NORTE 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CALLE FUEGO/SOLANA WAY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X X 2 0 2 44 X X 1 1 2 43 X X X X 2 2 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 41 X X X 2 1 3 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 85TH %:40 38 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 50TH %:35 33 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 5 16 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 15TH %:32 29 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8 22 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 29 - 38 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 9 21 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 P % IN PACE:84%75%77% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 15 20 A 30 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 C % OVER PACE:10%14%9% 29 X X X X X 0 5 5 E 28 X X X X X X 1 5 6 *% UNDER PACE:6%11%14% 27 X X X 0 3 3 * 26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 34 35 M.P.H. 25 X 0 1 1 24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:16 18 18 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.16 0.18 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.40 0.43 0.30 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO SOLANA WAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:10:56AM 12:10PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):VIA NORTE AND DEL REY RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:CALLE ARANDA/SOLANA WAY 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 X 1 0 1 45 0 0 0 44 X 1 0 1 43 X X X 2 1 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X 2 0 2 41 X 1 0 1 40 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 85TH %:40 39 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 50TH %:36 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 36 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 15TH %:32 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 *10 MPH PACE:31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 * 32 X X X X X X X X 4 4 8 P % IN PACE:81%92%86% 31 X X X X 2 2 4 A 30 X X X X 1 3 4 C % OVER PACE:10%2%7% 29 X X X 3 0 3 E 28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:9%6%7% 27 X X 2 0 2 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:36 36 36 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:15 10 13 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 3 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.22 0.19 0.11 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.43 0.33 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 70 52 122 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO SOLANA WAY CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:12:42PM 1:51PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):DENDY PKWY AND FULLER RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:WINCHESTER RD/COLT CT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:50 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 X 1 0 1 49 0 0 0 48 X 1 0 1 47 X 1 0 1 46 X X X 3 0 3 45 X X 2 0 2 44 X 0 1 1 43 X X X X 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X 4 2 6 41 X X X X X 4 1 5 40 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 85TH %:41 37 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X 3 3 6 38 X X X X X 4 1 5 50TH %:33 30 32 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 36 X X X X X 3 2 5 15TH %:27 22 23 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 *10 MPH PACE:27 - 36 26 - 35 26 - 35 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 P % IN PACE:54%51%53% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 C % OVER PACE:32%19%27% 29 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 E 28 X X X X X 3 2 5 *% UNDER PACE:14%30%21% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * 26 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 30 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X 0 5 5 24 X X X X X X 4 2 6 SAMPLE VARIANCE:49 47 52 23 X X X X X X X 0 7 7 22 X X X X X 2 3 5 STANDARD DEVIATION:7 7 7 M.P.H. 21 X X 2 0 2 20 X X X X 0 4 4 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.49 0.47 0.26 19 X X X X X 1 4 5 18 X X X X 1 3 4 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.70 0.69 0.51 M.P.H. 17 X 1 0 1 16 X X 0 2 2 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:1:54PM 2:29PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):FULLER RD AND DIAZ RD 65 0 0 0 64 X 1 0 1 OBSERVATION POINT:42235 WINCHESTER RD 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:50 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 X 0 1 1 57 X 0 1 1 ROAD SURFACE: 56 X X 0 2 2 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 X X X X 2 2 4 53 X X X 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 X X X X 1 3 4 51 X X 1 1 2 50 X X X X 0 4 4 49 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 46 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 44 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 43 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 3 13 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 85TH %:47 49 48 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 50TH %:42 42 42 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %:35 35 35 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 * 34 X X X X X X 3 3 6 *10 MPH PACE:39 - 48 40 - 49 40 - 49 M.P.H. 33 X X 2 0 2 * 32 X X X X 1 3 4 P % IN PACE:61%53%56% 31 0 0 0 A 30 X X X 1 2 3 C % OVER PACE:10%15%11% 29 X X 1 1 2 E 28 X X 2 0 2 *% UNDER PACE:29%32%33% 27 0 0 0 * 26 X 0 1 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:42 42 42 M.P.H. 25 X 0 1 1 24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:38 56 47 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:6 7 7 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.38 0.56 0.23 19 X 0 1 1 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.62 0.75 0.48 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:34PM 2:51PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):DIAZ RD AND ENTERPRISE CIR 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DRIVEWAY NORTH OF DIAZ RD PAST THE BRIDGE 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X 2 0 2 41 X 1 0 1 40 X X X X X 1 4 5 85TH %:37 36 37 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 38 X X X X X 2 3 5 50TH %:33 32 33 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 4 13 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 15TH %:28 27 28 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 *10 MPH PACE:28 - 37 27 - 36 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 P % IN PACE:78%79%76% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 C % OVER PACE:12%15%12% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 *% UNDER PACE:10%6%13% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 * 26 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 32 33 M.P.H. 25 X X X X 2 2 4 24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 16 17 23 X 1 0 1 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.16 0.08 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.40 0.29 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:56PM 3:13PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):ENTERPRISE CIR AND JEFFERSON AVE 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:41750 WINCHESTER RD 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X X X 0 3 3 44 X 0 1 1 43 X X X X X 3 2 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X 1 2 3 41 X X X 2 1 3 40 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 85TH %:39 39 39 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 50TH %:34 34 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 15TH %:30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 12 18 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 29 - 38 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 12 19 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 P % IN PACE:77%75%76% 31 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 C % OVER PACE:10%18%12% 29 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 E 28 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 *% UNDER PACE:13%7%13% 27 X X X 1 2 3 * 26 X X 2 0 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 35 34 M.P.H. 25 X X X X 3 1 4 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 19 19 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.19 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.43 0.44 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/27/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:3:18PM 3:36PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):JEFFERSON AVE AND YNEZ RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:SKECHERS PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 1 0 1 41 X X 2 0 2 40 X X X X X 3 2 5 85TH %:37 37 37 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 38 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 50TH %:33 31 32 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 3 12 36 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 15TH %:25 26 26 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 5 17 *10 MPH PACE:28 - 37 28 - 37 28 - 37 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 * 32 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 P % IN PACE:67%66%67% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 11 14 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 C % OVER PACE:13%14%14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 2 12 14 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 *% UNDER PACE:20%20%20% 27 X X X X 2 2 4 * 26 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:32 31 32 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X 2 4 6 24 X X X 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE:34 24 29 23 X X X 1 2 3 22 X 1 0 1 STANDARD DEVIATION:6 5 5 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X 2 3 5 20 X X X X X X 5 1 6 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.34 0.24 0.14 19 X X 2 0 2 18 X 1 0 1 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.58 0.49 0.38 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS PARTLY SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:3:47PM 4:09PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):YNEZ RD AND PROMENADE MALL WEST 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DOCTOR'S MEDICAL PARK PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 X X X X X 0 5 5 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X 1 2 3 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 85TH %:40 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 50TH %:35 36 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 8 21 36 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 15TH %:30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 * 34 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 P % IN PACE:70%75%70% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4 14 C % OVER PACE:16%7%4% 29 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 E 28 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *% UNDER PACE:14%18%26% 27 X X X X 3 1 4 * 26 X X X X X 3 2 5 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:35 36 35 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:20 20 20 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.20 0.20 0.10 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.45 0.44 0.32 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:3:22PM 3:41PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):PROMENADE MALL WEST AND PROMENADE MALL EAST 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:BUSHFIRE KITCHEN PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X X X X 3 1 4 44 X 0 1 1 43 X X 2 0 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X 1 0 1 41 X X X X 4 0 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 85TH %:39 38 38 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X 6 0 6 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 50TH %:34 33 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 36 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 15TH %:30 29 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 5 13 P % IN PACE:75%82%79% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 C % OVER PACE:20%7%14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 E 28 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *% UNDER PACE:5%11%8% 27 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:35 34 34 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 16 17 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.16 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.40 0.29 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:3:01PM 3:18PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):PROMENADE MALL EAST AND MARGARITA RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:BIG O TIRES PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 X 0 1 1 45 X 0 1 1 44 0 0 0 43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X 0 2 2 41 X X 0 2 2 40 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 85TH %:37 39 38 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 38 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 50TH %:34 33 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 6 17 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 15TH %:30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 4 12 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 14 26 *10 MPH PACE:30 - 39 29 - 38 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 P % IN PACE:81%78%79% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 C % OVER PACE:5%16%14% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 E 28 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *% UNDER PACE:14%6%8% 27 X X X X 3 1 4 * 26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 34 34 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 X X 2 0 2 SAMPLE VARIANCE:14 18 16 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.14 0.18 0.08 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.38 0.42 0.28 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:2:38PM 2:55PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):MARGARITA RD AND RORIPAUGH RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DICKEY'S BARBEQUE PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:40 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 X X 0 2 2 44 X X X 3 0 3 43 X X X X 2 2 4 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X 1 3 4 41 X X X X X X X X 1 7 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 3 8 11 85TH %:38 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 50TH %:34 34 34 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X 5 2 7 36 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 15TH %:29 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 11 23 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 32 - 41 29 - 38 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 9 18 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 P % IN PACE:80%70%74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 5 15 C % OVER PACE:13%7%20% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 E 28 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 *% UNDER PACE:7%23%7% 27 X X X 2 1 3 * 26 X 1 0 1 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:34 35 34 M.P.H. 25 X 1 0 1 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:18 19 19 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.18 0.19 0.09 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.42 0.44 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:2:16PM 2:34PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):RORIPAUGH RD AND NICOLAS RD 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:DRIVEWAY IN FRONT OF SPORTS FIELDS AT CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:50 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 X 1 0 1 55 X X 2 0 2 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 X X X 2 1 3 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 X X 1 1 2 51 X X X 0 3 3 50 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 47 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 44 X X X X X X X X X X 6 4 10 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 9 22 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 85TH %:49 49 49 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X 3 3 6 38 X X X X X 2 3 5 50TH %:44 43 43 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X 3 6 9 36 X X X X 3 1 4 15TH %:40 37 38 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X 1 5 6 * 34 X X X 2 1 3 *10 MPH PACE:40 - 49 41 - 50 40 - 49 M.P.H. 33 X 0 1 1 * 32 X X 0 2 2 P % IN PACE:75%64%70% 31 X 0 1 1 A 30 X X X 0 3 3 C % OVER PACE:11%5%11% 29 0 0 0 E 28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:14%31%20% 27 0 0 0 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:44 43 44 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 31 27 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 6 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.22 0.31 0.14 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.55 0.37 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/26/22 DAY:Tuesday TIME PERIOD:1:55PM 2:11PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):NICOLAS RD AND EAST CITY LIMIT 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:WINCHESTER RD/RUSTIC GLEN DR 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 X 1 0 1 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:55 MPH OBSERVER: 60 X 1 0 1 59 X X 1 1 2 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 X 0 1 1 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION: 54 X X X 2 1 3 53 X X 1 1 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 X X 1 1 2 51 X X 0 2 2 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 7 14 48 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 47 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 11 20 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 7 22 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 10 15 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7 41 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 85TH %:49 49 49 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X 2 3 5 38 X X X X 3 1 4 50TH %:45 45 45 M.P.H. 37 X X 1 1 2 36 X X 1 1 2 15TH %:40 39 40 M.P.H. 35 X X X X 1 3 4 * 34 0 0 0 *10 MPH PACE:40 - 49 41 - 50 41 - 50 M.P.H. 33 X X X 0 3 3 * 32 X X 0 2 2 P % IN PACE:78%75%76% 31 X 0 1 1 A 30 0 0 0 C % OVER PACE:14%7%8% 29 0 0 0 E 28 0 0 0 *% UNDER PACE:8%18%17% 27 0 0 0 * 26 0 0 0 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:46 45 45 M.P.H. 25 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:22 29 25 23 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:5 5 5 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.22 0.29 0.13 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.47 0.54 0.36 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 100 100 200 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WINCHESTER ROAD CARLOS SUNNY DRY DATE:07/20/22 DAY:Wednesday TIME PERIOD:2:09PM 3:33PM FOR ROADWAY: SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL (MPH)EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN):WOLF VALLEY RD AND PECHANGA PKWY 65 0 0 0 64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT:PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL SPORTS PARK PARKING LOT 63 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT:35 MPH OBSERVER: 60 0 0 0 59 0 0 0 COMMENTS:WEATHER: 58 0 0 0 57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE: 56 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION: 54 0 0 0 53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD: 52 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 49 0 0 0 48 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 44 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 0 0 0 41 X 1 0 1 40 0 0 0 85TH %:37 32 36 M.P.H. 39 X X X 3 0 3 38 X X X 3 0 3 50TH %:33 30 32 M.P.H. 37 X X X X 4 0 4 36 X X X X X X X X 7 1 8 15TH %:30 27 29 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 2 12 * 34 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 *10 MPH PACE:29 - 38 26 - 35 27 - 36 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 * 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14 P % IN PACE:90%94%87% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 C % OVER PACE:6%2%9% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 8 12 E 28 X X X X X X X X 2 6 8 *% UNDER PACE:4%4%3% 27 X X X X X 1 4 5 * 26 X X 0 2 2 *ARITHMETIC MEAN:33 30 32 M.P.H. 25 X 0 1 1 24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE:10 7 11 23 X 0 1 1 22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION:3 3 3 M.P.H. 21 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN:0.15 0.14 0.10 19 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN:0.38 0.37 0.31 M.P.H. 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 68 51 119 FAIR RADAR CITY OF TEMECULA TO WOLF CREEK DRIVE CARLOS SUNNY DRY 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula APPENDIX C Survey Equipment 2022 Engineering and Traffic Survey City of Temecula SURVEY EQUIPMENT USED The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano, Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 15, 2019 by RHF Inc. Willdan Engineering 13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405 City of Industry, CA 91746 562.908.6200 Item No. 4 California Highway Patrol Temecula Area Report for September 2022 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Services Provided •19 Child safety seat installations •6 Traffic Safety Presentations •3 Community outreach booths This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA-NC Enforcement Activity •Total Enforcement Contacts – 976 •September 29th Special Enforcement Units on I-15 (67 enforcement contacts between Via Rancho and SR- 74) This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Driving Under the Influence •Monthly Arrests –36 (17 DUI t/c’s) •Up 10 from last month This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-ND Traffic Collisions •Non-Injury –77 •Injury –54 •Fatal –2 •Fatal Year to Date –23 •Total Collisions –135 Fatal Traffic Collisions / Major Investigations •S/B I-15 s/of Olive •Zeiders Road s/of Keller Road This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA Item No. 5 Created by: Deputy R. Renick #2840 Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Temecula Traffic Incidents, Activities and Events Report for the month of September 2022 Created by: Deputy R. Renick #2840 Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Citation Totals Total Hazardous Citations 614 Total Non-Hazardous Citations 268 Seatbelt Citations (Included) 35 Cell phone Citations (Included) 210 Parking Citations 89 Written Warnings Issued (Included) 104 Total Citations Issued 1075 City Funded Targeted Enforcement S.L.A.P. Citations (Included) 48 Commercial Enforcement Citations (Included) 41 Created by: Deputy R. Renick #2840 Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report Driving Under the Influence D.U.I. Arrests 24 D.U.I. Arrests YTD 346 D.U.I. YTD Previous Year (2021) 331 OTS/City Funded Special Operations DUI Checkpoints 0 Know Your Limit Campaign 0 DUI Sweep 0 Targeted Traffic Enforcement Saturation 0 Created by: Deputy R. Renick #2840 Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula Southwest Station Traffic Report 2022 – Citations / Incidents July Aug Sept 3 Month Total Citations Issued for Hazardous Citations (Moving Viol.) 799 1442 614 2855 Non-Hazardous Citations 115 189 268 572 “Click It or Ticket” and/or Seatbelt Citations 18 47 35 100 Distracted Driver (Cell Phone Use) 291 426 210 927 Parking Citations 147 148 89 384 Written Warnings Issued 161 265 104 530 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) Red Light 47 93 48 188 Commercial Enforcement Citations 29 25 41 95 Non-Injury Collisions 27 28 33 88 Injury Collisions 20 31 27 78 DUI Arrests 44 51 24 119 Created by: Deputy R. Renick #2840 Southwest Station Traffic Division City of Temecula/Southwest Station Uniform Crime Report (August 2022) Jurisdiction Part 1 Homicide Sexual Assault Robbery Aggravated Assault Property Crime Burglary Vehicle Theft Larceny/ Theft Arson Total Pt 1 Crimes Southwest 13 0 0 1 12 44 9 4 31 0 57 Violent Crime = homicide, sexual assault, robbery, aggravated assault totals combined Property Crime = burglary, vehicle theft, larceny-theft totals combined Temecula 7 0 1 3 3 222 43 32 147 0 229 Item No. 6 City of Temecula Fire Department Incident Type Commercial Fire 1 False Alarms 92 Haz Mat 2 Medical 622 Multi-Fam 0 Other Fire 8 Other Misc 10 Public Assist 46 Residential Fire 0 Rescue 3 Ringing Alarm 6 Standby 6 Traffic Collision 62 Wildland/Vehicle Fire 4 Total 862 Temecula Fire Department Service Calls September 2022 City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections September 2022 Plan Review and Inspections August Year to Date Plan Review 607 4568 Construction Inspections 270 3216 Annual Inspections 424 4888 Counter/Public Inquiries 27 287 Item No. 7