Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12072022 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 7, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Bob Hagel ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of November 16, 2022Recommendation: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda December 7, 2022 Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca .gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.General Plan Consistency Review for an Amendment to the Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (Long Range Project Number LR22-1073), Katie Garcia Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (“CIP”) TO ADD ONE PROJECT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-1073) Recommendation: Agenda Report Planning Commission Resolution CIP Budget Amendment Sheet CWPP Area Map Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision . Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda December 7, 2022 Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 3.Planning Application No. PA22-0293, a Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0293, A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA99-0378) FOR THE ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,824 SQUARE FEET TO THE VEHICLE SHOWROOM AND SERVICE AREA OF AN EXISTING AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, A NEW APPROXIMATELY 674 SQUARE FOOT VEHICLE DELIVERY CANOPY AREA, ELEVATION REVISIONS TO ADHERE TO NEW CORPORATE COLORS, AND A NEW VEHICLE DISPLAY PAD AT THE ENTRY DRIVEWAY LOCATED AT 27430 YNEZ ROAD AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Plan Reductions Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 4.Planning Application No. PA22-0621, a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection, Jaime Cardenas Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- Recommendation: Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda December 7, 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0621, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 68,700 SQUARE FEET (41,805 SQUARE FEET AND 26,890 SQUARE FEET) ON 3.95 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 250-FEET WEST OF THE WINCHESTER AND DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing RCA Joint Review Findings (#22-04-13-01) Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, December 21, 2022, 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 4 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 16, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chair Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Ruiz ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio (absent), Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT The following individual(s) addressed the Commission on non-agendized items(s): • Sirvan Javahirzadeh • Jason Deweese • Ernest Bellenbaum The following individual(s) addressed the Commission on agendized item(s): • Ken Roycroft (Item #3) CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Turley-Trejo. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of October 19, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Long Range Planning Project Number LR22-0182, Amending Title 5 and 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code as detailed in Ordinance “2023- ” attached here as Exhibit A, Mark Collins Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLES 2 5 AND 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MAKE MINOR REVISIONS TO MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT, CAR WASH, FLAG POLE, AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REGULATIONS, ESTABLISH PARKING GARAGE STANDARDS, CLARIFY THE PERMITTED USES ALLOWED IN THE OPEN SPACE AND OPEN SPACE-CONSERVATION DISTRICT ZONES, CLARIFY THAT ENTERTAINMENT LICENSES ARE REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN USES IN PDO-4 AND PDO-10, MODIFY THE DEFINITION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MANUFACTURER AND GUEST HOUSE, ADD DEFINITIONS FOR ACTIVE AND PASSIVE RECREATION, MAKE OTHER CLERICAL REVISIONS TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3)" Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 3. Planning Application No. PA21-0128, a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan, Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND LENNAR HOMES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AND WINCHESTER HILLS I LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0128)" Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Hagel. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 3 COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 6:49 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, December 7, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Gary Watts, Chairperson Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: December 7, 2022 PREPARED BY: Katie Garcia, Planning Technician PROJECT SUMMARY: General Plan Consistency Review for an Amendment to the Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (LR22-1073) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed Amendment to the current Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program and make a determination that the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the adopted City of Temecula’s General Plan. CEQA: Exempt: Not a “Project” as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(4) BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Government Code Section 65103 of State Planning and Zoning Law requires that the Planning Commission review and provide comments to the City Council regarding the conformity of the proposed amendment to the current Fiscal Year 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the adopted General Plan. On June 14, 2022, the City Council approved the CIP Budget for FY 2023-27. The CIP included a number of projects to be completed during the five-year Capital Improvement Program. In addition to the approved CIP, staff is recommending the addition of one (1) project, consisting of one (1) new Infrastructure Project – Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). This project will be funded through a “Reimbursement Grant” from CalFire (Grant No. 5GG20167). Prior to Council appropriating funding to the project, the Planning Commission must first make findings that the project is consistent with the General Plan. ANALYSIS Infrastructure Projects The Fiscal Years 2023-27 CIP Amendment contains one (1) project in this category. 1. The Community Wildfire Protection Plan, entitled Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan, will utilize the highest-risk and most complex property within the City of Temecula as a model for how to develop comprehensive planning for other properties subject to fire risk throughout the City. The project is located in the southwest portion of the City at the confluence of Temecula and Murrieta Creeks, and includes 177 acres on both sides of I-15, as detailed in Attachment 3. Staff will work with a consultant, and group of other organizations and jurisdictions to reduce the risk of fire. Additionally, the project will address concerns relating to habitat, wildlife, human trespass and homelessness as staff will take a wholistic approach ensuring that varied interests cooperate for a common good. Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that this project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Open Space/Conservation Element and the Public Safety Element. Open Space/Conservation Element: Goal 3 Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species of concern, wildlife movement corridors, and general biodiversity. Policy 3.2 Work with State, regional and non-profit agencies and organizations to preserve and enhance significant biological resources. Policy 3.7 Maintain and enhance the resources of Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, Murrieta Creek, Santa Gertrudis Creek, Santa Margarita River, and other waterways to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat, wildlife, and wildlife movement corridors. Public Safety Element: Goal 1 Protection from natural hazards associated with geological instability, seismic events, wild land fires, flooding, and dam failures. Policy 1.8 Reduce the risk of wild land fire through imposition of site-specific development standards during project review and coordination with the City Fire Department and other organizations. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS No public hearing notice is required for the Planning Commission’s review and conformity finding of the proposed Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with Title 14 California Code of Regulations. The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Furthermore, the Amendment for FY 2023-27 CIP project is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the commonsense exemption, which provides that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in questions may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Planning Commission’s review and determination that the Amendment to the FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. CIP Budget Amendment Sheet 3. CWPP Area Map PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (“CIP”) TO ADD ONE PROJECT TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-1073) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula originally adopted a comprehensive General Plan in 2005, which has been amended to include specific policies and objectives for infrastructure, construction and maintenance of public facilities; and B. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65402 and 65403, the Planning Commission is required to review the Capital Improvement Program to determine that it is consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan; and C. Staff is proposing the addition of the following project to the Capital Improvement Program: Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP), an Infrastructure Project.; and D. Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that the Project is consistent with the General Plan, and furthers the goals and policies of the Public Safety and Open Space/Conservation Element of the adopted General Plan; and E. On December 7, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a public meeting to consider the proposed Project for Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and F. The Project within the CIP Amendment is categorized as Infrastructure; and G. This capital project is consistent with goals, policies and program of the Temecula General Plan including the Open Space/Conservation Element and the Public Safety Element. The findings of consistency set forth in the staff report are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Consistency Finding. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Projects are consistent with the General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution: A. The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with Title 14 California Code of Regulations. The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Furthermore, the Amendment for FY 2023-27 CIP project is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the commonsense exemption, which provides that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in questions may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Planning Commission’s review and determination that the Amendment to the FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of December, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7 th day of December, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2021-22 Adjusted 2022-23 Proposed Budget 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 Projected 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 378,000 378,000 Total Expenditures --378,000 ----378,000 Source of Funds: Grants 378,000 378,000 Total Funding --378,000 ----378,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Funding Source is CalFire Grant No. 5GG20167 Project Description: The Community Wildfire Protection Plan, entitled Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan, will utilize the highest-risk and most complex property within the City of Temecula as a model for how to develop comprehensive planning for other properties subject to fire risk throughout the City. Benefit: The project is critically needed for 177 acres in Temecula Creek within the Very High Fire Severity Zone. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) would be reduced with a plan to prevent wildfires, reduce burn area and protect the adjacent 28,491 acres and 3,048 structures worth an estimated $1.5 billion. The City will use this plan in other fire risk areas with sensitive habitat, and share it statewide to deter even more fires to reduce GHG. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This is a new project. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.NEW22- 23 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Infrastructure Project 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: December 7, 2022 PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0293, a Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Armen Kazanchyan General Plan Designation: Service Commercial (SC) Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing Automobile Dealership / Service Commercial (SC) North: Existing Multi-Family Residential Apartments/High Density Residential (H) South: Ynez Road/Existing Auto Dealership/Service Commercial (SC) East: Existing Restaurant/Community Commercial (CC) West: Existing Auto Dealership/Service Commercial (SC) 2 Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 3.62 Acres 0.92 Acres Minimum Total Floor Area/Ratio: 22,898 Square Feet of Proposed & Existing / 0.15 Proposed .30 Maximum Parking Required/Provided: 228 Parking Parking Spaces Proposed 111 Parking Spaces Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On December 15, 1999, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Development Plan to construct a 12,825-square-foot automobile dealership. On April 22, 2019, the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved a Modification to the previously approved Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 6,585 square-foot two-story building on the rear portion of the existing Temecula Hyundai site to include new service bays, parts storage, and offices. On March 8, 2022, Armen Kazanchyan, submitted Planning Application PA22-0293, a Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project is located in the Service Commercial (SC) district at 27430 Ynez Road on a developed lot. The applicant seeks to expand the existing building for additional showroom and service area space as well as the addition of a vehicle delivery area on the east side of the building and a vehicle display pad located along Ynez Road in order to showcase Hyundai product. There are four points of vehicular access to the project site with limited right in/right out access off of Ynez Road, access to the property to the west through a driveway, access from the north through an alley that exits onto Solana Way, and access to the east through an alley as well that exits onto Ynez Road. The proposed parking on the site exceeds the Development Code requirements. 3 Architecture Hyundai has changed the corporate colors from the existing silver, gray, and blue to earth tones consisting of browns and tans. As a result of this the building will undergo a complete repaint of all exterior walls in the new corporate colors. The front of the building will include an extensive wall of windows that wraps along the east side of the building as well as an additional roll up service door adjacent to the two existing service doors. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on November 24, 2022, and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects). (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because automobile dealerships are an allowable use within the Service Commercial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a developed site containing an automobile dealership that is less than five acres. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial development, residential development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on the portion of a fully developed project site that currently contains parking, asphalt, and landscaping which contains no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened. The project site is not located within a Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) criteria cell. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project and the proposed use is allowed within the Service Commercial zoning district. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to 4 traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project, as conditioned, is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. FINDINGS Modification (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Automobile dealerships, as conditioned, are an allowable use within the Service Commercial zone. Therefore, the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. PC Resolution 3. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 4. Exhibit B – Plan Reductions 5. Notice of Exemption 6. Notice of Public Hearing Y N E Z C T C O U R T N E Y P L C A R A W Y MA RGARI T A RDY NEZ R D D L R D R S O L A N A W Y Project Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA19-1307 0 400200 Feet\Date Created: 1/2/2020 1:2,4001 inch = 200 feet 921-290-014 The map PA19-1307.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0293, A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA99- 0378) FOR THE ADDITION OF APPROXIMATELY 3,824 SQUARE FEET TO THE VEHICLE SHOWROOM AND SERVICE AREA OF AN EXISTING AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, A NEW APPROXIMATELY 674 SQUARE FOOT VEHICLE DELIVERY CANOPY AREA, ELEVATION REVISIONS TO ADHERE TO NEW CORPORATE COLORS, AND A NEW VEHICLE DISPLAY PAD AT THE ENTRY DRIVEWAY LOCATED AT 27430 YNEZ ROAD AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On March 8, 2022, Armen Kazanchyan filed Planning Application No. PA22-0293, a Modification to a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 7, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0293, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Modification to the Development Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modification, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; Automobile dealerships, as conditioned, are an allowable use within the Service Commercial zone. Therefore, the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because automobile dealerships are an allowable use within the Service Commercial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a developed site containing an automobile dealership that is less than five acres. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial development, residential development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is not located within a Multi Species Habitation Conservation Strategy (MSHCP) criteria cell and therefore is not required by the Regional Conservation Authority and State and Federal agencies to take place in the Joint Project Review process. Therefore, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Service Commercial zoning district, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0293, Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plans set forth on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of December, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of December, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22 -0293 A Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-290-014 Commercial MSHCP Category: Retail Commercial DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Retail Commercial N/A (Non -Residential Project) December 7, 2022 December 7, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 12 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 12 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 5. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 6. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 7. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 8. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color EFIS Wall/Paint Kaffee (SW6104) EFIS Wall/Paint Antiler Velvet (SW9111) Metal Fascia Shaped Sky 9. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 10. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 11. Page 3 of 12 Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 12. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 13. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 14. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 15. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 16. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 17. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 18. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 19. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized. 20. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 21. Page 4 of 12 Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 22. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 23. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 24. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 25. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 26. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 27. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 28. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 29. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 30. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 31. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 32. Page 5 of 12 NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 33. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 34. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 35. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 36. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 37. Page 6 of 12 Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 38. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 39. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 40. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 41. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 42. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 43. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 44. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 45. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 46. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 47. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 48. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the Developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 49. Page 7 of 12 BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 50. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 51. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 52. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 53. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 54. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 55. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 56. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 57. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 58. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 59. Page 8 of 12 Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 60. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial and multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 61. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for commercial projects and industrial projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 62. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5). 63. F-100. Per the California Building Code and California Fire Code, along with Title 19 for Public Safety, the occupancy for this establishment must be complied with at all times. The owner will be responsible for assigning designees to count patrons as they enter and exit. At any given time, if the fire department and/or building department find you in violation of this they will be required to either close the facility entirely, have the owner remove patrons until the occupant load is at or less than allowed and request fines to be issued to the owner. If there is continued violations occurring within the establishment the building department and/or fire department will recommend that the city planning department revoke the owners CUP. 64. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 65. Fire Dept. Turnaround. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 66. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 67. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Page 9 of 12 Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 68. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish electronic copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). This is required for any changes to anything in regards to the underground fire system. 69. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 70. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 71. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 72. Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 73. Knox Box. A “Knox-Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 74. Additional Submittals (Hazardous Materials). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report. A full hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any building storing or using hazardous materials (CFC Chapters 1 and 50 through 67 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 75. Additional Submittals (Fire Above/Below Ground Tanks). The developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health Department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 57 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 76. Page 10 of 12 High Piled Stock. Buildings housing high-piles combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of California Fire Code Chapter 32 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The storage of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or modifications to the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some or all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire Department access roads (CFC Chapter 32 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 77. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower-level windows. 78. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 79. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 80. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 81. Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 82. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 83. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 84. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 85. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 86. Page 11 of 12 Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 87. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a “call-out only” feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 88. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 89. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 90. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 91. Page 12 of 12 EVEVYNEZ ROADN 31°26'08" W 367.43'S 5 8 ° 0 2 ' 4 7 " W 4 7 6 . 9 1 ' N 33°47'39" E 452.12'N 58°33'52" E 139.72'L=157.57'Δ=7°07'32" R=1267.00'(E)TELEC.(N) VEHICLEDELIVERY CANOPY674 S.F. (B.C.)(E) 2-STORYHYUNDAIDEALERSHIP BUILDINGTO BE REMODELED11,992 S.F. (B.C.)12,489 S.F. (Z.C. GROSS)11,260 S.F. (Z.C. NET)(E) 2-STORY SERVICEBUILDINGTO REMAINAPPROVED UNDERPA19-10375,752 S.F. (B.C.)6,585 S.F. (Z.C. GROSS)5,342 S.F. (Z.C. NET)(N) ADDITION4,403 S.F. (B.C.)3,824 S.F. (Z.C. GROSS)3,662 S.F. (Z.C. NET)PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPR O P E R T Y L I N E℄S 5 8 ° 0 2 ' 4 7 " W 4 7 6 . 9 1 ' N 33°47'39" E 452.12'N 56°12'21" W 39.10'(E) WALKWAY1TEMECULA HYUNDAIARCHITECT:ARMEN KAZANCHYAN3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201GLENDALE, CA 91208T: 818-395-2686armen.arch@gmail.comKAZANCHYANDESIGNPROJECT ADDRESS:27430 YNEZ RDTEMECULA, CA 92591File Location: C:\Users\Armen\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-102 PROPOSED SITE PLAN.dwg Last Saved: October 3, 2022, by Armen Plotted: Monday, October 3, 2022 9:10:00 AM by ArmenA-102SITE PLANPROPOSED SITE PLANVICINITY MAP:PROJECT SITEPARKING CALCULATION:SITE PLAN LEGEND:KEY NOTES:PROJECT / BUILDING INFO:SCOPE OF WORK: UPLEGEND:NOTES:1TEMECULA HYUNDAIARCHITECT:ARMEN KAZANCHYAN3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201GLENDALE, CA 91208T: 818-395-2686armen.arch@gmail.comKAZANCHYANDESIGNPROJECT ADDRESS:27430 YNEZ RDTEMECULA, CA 92591File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-111 DEMO 1ST FLOOR PLAN.dwg Last Saved: March 4, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, May 16, 2022 7:52:35 AM by ParuyrEXISTING & DEMOFIRST FLOOR PLANA-111EXISTING & DEMO FIRST FLOOR PLAN DNDNOPEN TOBELOWLEGEND:NOTES:1TEMECULA HYUNDAIARCHITECT:ARMEN KAZANCHYAN3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201GLENDALE, CA 91208T: 818-395-2686armen.arch@gmail.comKAZANCHYANDESIGNPROJECT ADDRESS:27430 YNEZ RDTEMECULA, CA 92591File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-112 DEMO 2ND FLOOR PLAN.dwg Last Saved: March 4, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, May 16, 2022 7:53:16 AM by ParuyrEXISTING & DEMOSECOND FLOOR PLANA-112EXISTING & DEMO SECOND FLOOR PLAN EVEV UPFILEFILE FILEFILE FILE FILE UPEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXITEXIT LEGEND:KEYNOTES:1TEMECULA HYUNDAIARCHITECT:ARMEN KAZANCHYAN3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201GLENDALE, CA 91208T: 818-395-2686armen.arch@gmail.comKAZANCHYANDESIGNPROJECT ADDRESS:27430 YNEZ RDTEMECULA, CA 92591File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-121 PROPOSED 1ST FLOOR PLAN.dwg Last Saved: July 18, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, July 18, 2022 10:14:45 AM by ParuyrFIRST FLOOR PLANA-121PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN GROSS FLOOR AREA:TOTAL:16,313 S.F.ZONING CODE AREAS: GROSS FLOOR AREA:TOTAL:16,395 S.F.BUILDING CODE AREA: NET FLOOR AREA:TOTAL:14,922 S.F. 1TEMECULA HYUNDAIARCHITECT:ARMEN KAZANCHYAN3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201GLENDALE, CA 91208T: 818-395-2686armen.arch@gmail.comKAZANCHYANDESIGNPROJECT ADDRESS:27430 YNEZ RDTEMECULA, CA 92591File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-123 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN.dwg Last Saved: February 17, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, May 16, 2022 7:55:02 AM by ParuyrROOF PLANA-123PROPOSED ROOF PLANNOTES:LEGEND: A-203 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION TEMECULA HYUNDAI ARCHITECT: ARMEN KAZANCHYAN 3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201 GLENDALE, CA 91208 T: 818-395-2686 armen.arch@gmail.com KAZANCHYANDESIGN PROJECT ADDRESS: 27430 YNEZ RD TEMECULA, CA 92591 File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-203 + EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .dwg Last Saved: May 13, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, May 16, 2022 7:48:01 AM by Paruyr EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE: TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR / DESCRIPTION MANF. / SUPPLIER EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (CONT'D): TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR MANF. / SUPPLIER EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (CONT'D): TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR / DESCRIPTION MANF. / SUPPLIER 1PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION A-204 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION TEMECULA HYUNDAI ARCHITECT: ARMEN KAZANCHYAN 3786 LA CRESCENTA AVE, SUITE 201 GLENDALE, CA 91208 T: 818-395-2686 armen.arch@gmail.com KAZANCHYANDESIGN PROJECT ADDRESS: 27430 YNEZ RD TEMECULA, CA 92591 File Location: C:\Users\Paruyr\AK Architecture Dropbox\A-AUTO\2102 - Temecula Hyundai - 27430 Ynez Rd, Temecula, CA 92591\Drawings\SD_DD\A-203 + EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS .dwg Last Saved: May 13, 2022, by Paruyr Plotted: Monday, May 16, 2022 7:48:20 AM by Paruyr EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE: TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR / DESCRIPTION MANF. / SUPPLIER EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (CONT'D): TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR MANF. / SUPPLIER EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE (CONT'D): TAG HATCH MATERIAL COLOR / DESCRIPTION MANF. / SUPPLIER 1PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com December 8, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA22-0293, Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form, Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov 1 City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Hyundai Modification (PA22-0293) Description of Project: A Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway Project Location: 27430 Ynez Road, Temecula, CA 92591 Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside The Planning Commission approved the above-described project on December 7, 2022 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: (Section Number 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) Other: Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because automobile dealerships are an allowable use within the Service Commercial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. 2 The project is located within City limits and is located on a developed site containing an automobile dealership that is less than five acres. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial development, residential development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on the portion of a fully developed project site that currently contains parking, asphalt, and landscaping which contains no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened. The project site is not located within a Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) criteria cell. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project and the proposed use is allowed within the Service Commercial zoning district. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project, as conditioned, is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner Phone Number: (951) 506-5137 Signature: Date: Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA - 41000 Main Street- Temecula, CA 92590 – TemeculaCA.gov A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No.: PA22-0293 Applicant: Armen Kazanchyan Project Location: 27430 Ynez Road, Temecula, CA 92591 Proposal: A Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA99-0378) for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area of an existing automobile dealership, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) Case Planner: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: December 7, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: December 7, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Jaime Cardenas, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0621, a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Daniel Lee (Phelan Development Company) General Plan Designation: Industrial Park (IP) Zoning Designation: Light Industrial (LI) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Industrial Park (IP) North: Existing Industrial Building, Industrial Park (IP) South: Existing Industrial Building, Industrial Park (IP) East: Existing Industrial Building, Industrial Park (IP) West: Existing Industrial Building, Industrial Park (IP) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required 2 Lot Area: 3.95 Acres 0.92 Acres Minimum Total Floor Area/Ratio: 0.39 FAR 0.40 FAR Maximum Landscape Area/Coverage: 22.3% 20.0% Minimum Parking Provided/Required: 79 Parking Spaces 79 Parking Spaces (required) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On June 6, 2022, Phelan Development Company submitted Planning Application PA22-0621, a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project is located in the Light Industrial (IP) zoning district. The applicant seeks to construct two new industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet. The project is consistent with the City of Temecula Design Guidelines for industrial development including building, site, and landscaping design. The vehicular access to the project is from two driveways on Winchester Road that utilizes enhanced paving with score lines. The project is required to provide seventy-nine (79) parking spaces for an office/warehouse use per the parking standards from Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The project proposes seventy-nine (79) parking spaces. The project provides two outdoor employee break areas that includes tables with seats, umbrellas, a trash receptacle, and enhanced paving. Architecture The architectural design of the project features “four-sided architecture” that incorporates contrasting painted concrete, anodized aluminum canopy and façade accents, and a prominent entrance to the building featuring taller walls and metal soffits over windows. The building is architecturally designed to match other buildings along Winchester Road and to be complementary to other business park and industrial buildings within the City of Temecula. Landscaping The project, when completed, would provide 22.3% landscaping which exceeds the minimum 20% landscape requirement of the development code. Plant types include London Plane Tree, Olive Tree, African Sumac, Australian Willow, Rosemary, Texas Ranger, and other shrubs throughout the site. 3 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on November 24, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because industrial buildings are an allowable use within the Light Industrial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 3.95 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project was required to go through the Habitat Assessment and Negotiation Strategy (HANS) process since the project site is located within a Multi Species Habitation Conservation Strategy (MSHCP) criteria cell. After review by the Regional Conservation Authority and State and Federal agencies, a Joint Project Review was issued (JPR 22-04-13-01) that determined the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Light Industrial zoning district, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan, and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. 4 The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because industrial buildings are an allowable use within the Light Industrial district. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Exemption 6. Notice of Public Hearing 7. RCA Joint Review Findings (#22-04-13-01) DIAZ RD W INCHESTERRDAVENIDA ALVARADOBLACKDEER LOOPENTERPRISECIR A Q U A VIS T AZEVODRR IO NEDOProject Site CITY O F TEMEC ULA PA22-0621 \Date Created: 11/14/2022 1:3,6001 inch = 300 feet 909-310 -002 The map PA22-0621.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"XXXXXXXXNORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING ANORTH ELEVATION - BUILDING BEAST ELEVATION - BUILDING AWEST ELEVATION - BUILDING ASOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING BSOUTH ELEVATION - BUILDING BEAST ELEVATION - BUILDING BWEST ELEVATION - BUILDING ACLEAR ANODIZEDACCENT CANOPYSTEEL C CHANNEL EYEBROWAT OFFICE ENTRY, typicalFUTURE PROPOSED TENANTSIGN LOCATION, typical12" HIGH FUTUREADDRESS SIGN LOCATIONCLEAR ANODIZEDSTOREFRONT SYSTEM, typical3'-0" x 7'-0" MANDOOR, typicalENTRY, typical12'-0" x 14'-0" GRADELEVEL DOOR, typical9'-0" x 10'-0" OVERHEADSECTIONAL DOOR, typicalPAINTED TILT-UPCONCRETE SCREENWALL, typicalVIEW OBSCURINGROLLING STEEL GATE;COLOR: BLACK, typicalCLEAR ANODIZEDSTOREFRONT SYSTEM, typicalPAINTED CONCRETEACCENT PILASTERPHELAN DEVELOPMENTLOGO, REFER TODETAIL B/A-6, typical35'-0" 37'-6" 39'-0" 35'-0" 38'-6" 36'-6" 39'-0" 39'-0" 35'-0" 39'-0" 35'-0"39'-0"35'-0" 39'-0" 35'-0" 36'-6" 37'-6" 36'-6" 35'-0"36'-6" 37'-6" 36'-6"36'-6"35'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 35'-0" 37'-6" 37'-6" 35'-0"36'-6" 8'-0" 8'-0" 36'-6"Winchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, California18600 MacArthur Boulevard - Suite 300 - Irvine, CA 92612 - Phone: (949) 833-1930Carlile Coatsworth Architects, IncPHELANDEVELOPMENT450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405Newport Beach, CA 92660G1P31" INSULATED DUAL PANE MEDIUM PERFORMANCEPPG VITRO PACIFICA GLASSCLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM MULLIONSP2P4P1TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL PANELFIELD COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS / HIGH REFLECTIVEWHITE / SW 7757TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL PANELACCENT COLORSHERWIN WILLIAMS / GRAY SCREEN / SW 7071TILT-UP CONCRETE WALL PANELACCENT COLORSHERWIN WILLIAMS / AFRICAN GRAY / SW 9162TILT-UP CONCRETE SCREEN WALL PANELACCENT COLORSHERWIN WILLIAMS / WEB GRAY / SW 7075LEGEND26 September 2022SCHEME 4BUILDING ELEVATIONSA-5PAINTED TILT-UPCONCRETE SCREENWALL, typicalVIEW OBSCURINGROLLING STEEL GATE;COLOR: BLACK, typical4'-0"1'-6" 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" 2'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" 4'-0"1'-6" 4'-0" 1'-6" 1'-6" 1'-6" Winchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, California18600 MacArthur Boulevard - Suite 300 - Irvine, CA 92612 - Phone: (949) 833-1930Carlile Coatsworth Architects, IncPHELANDEVELOPMENT450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405Newport Beach, CA 92660PROPOSED WAREHOUSEBUILDING A41,805 sf2,000 sfFUTUREOFFICE4 DOCK DOORS GLFLOOR PLAN (Building A)26 September 2022 ROOF PLAN (Building A)26 September 2022 CONCRETE SLAB9' x 10' OVERHEADSECTIONAL DOOR,typical3' x 7' MAN DOORWITH CONCRETESTAIRS, typical12' x 14' GRADELEVEL DOOR, typical3' x 7' MAN DOOR,typicalRIDGESLOPE1/4" PER FOOTSLOPE1/4" PER FOOTMETAL CANOPY BELOW, typicalFUTURE ROOFTOP UNIT TO BECOMPLETELY SCREENED BYPARAPET - FINAL LOCATION TOBE DETERMINED BY FUTURETENANT (UNDER SEPARATESUBMITTAL), typicalROOF DRAIN, typicalAA-6AA-640'60'50'210'50'50'52' 52'52'40'26'-3"31'-3"26'21'-1 1/4"10'20'10'21'-1 1/4"26'31'-3"26'-3"26'-3"31'-3"26'23'-10"23'-10"21'-11"31'-3"31'-3"35'-1"10'32'23'-10"23'-10"32'32'26'26'25'-7"28'-3 3/4"31'-3"26'-3"A-30'4'16'32'SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"PROPOSED FUTUREDEMISING WALLBETWEEN OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSEPROPOSED FUTURE FIRE SPRINKLER FIRERISER ROOM - SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGNER DURINGCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE. Winchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, California18600 MacArthur Boulevard - Suite 300 - Irvine, CA 92612 - Phone: (949) 833-1930Carlile Coatsworth Architects, IncPHELANDEVELOPMENT450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405Newport Beach, CA 926602,000 sfFUTUREOFFICEPROPOSED WAREHOUSEBUILDING B26,890 sf4 DOCK DOORS GLFLOOR PLAN (Building B)26 September 2022 ROOF PLAN (Building B)26 September 2022 CONCRETE SLABRIDGE SLOPE1/4" PER FOOTSLOPE1/4" PER FOOTMETAL CANOPY BELOW, typicalFUTURE ROOFTOP UNIT TO BECOMPLETELY SCREENED BYPARAPET - FINAL LOCATION TOBE DETERMINED BY FUTURETENANT (UNDER SEPARATESUBMITTAL), typicalROOF DRAIN, typicalAA-6AA-640'60'50'160'50'52'52'52' 26'-3"31'-3"19'-3"25'-7"26'26'26'-3"31'-3"18'-7"21'-8"18'-7"31'-3"26'-3"31'-3"28'-5 3/8"21'-8"19'-5 1/2"31'-3"26'-3"31'-3"20'20'23'-10"23'-10"20'21'-1"0'4'16'32'SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"A-4PROPOSED FUTUREDEMISING WALLBETWEEN OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSEPROPOSED FUTURE FIRE SPRINKLER FIRERISER ROOM - SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGNER DURINGCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE. Winchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, California18600 MacArthur Boulevard - Suite 300 - Irvine, CA 92612 - Phone: (949) 833-1930Carlile Coatsworth Architects, IncPHELANDEVELOPMENT450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405Newport Beach, CA 92660NORTHWinchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, CaliforniaVICINITY MAPSHEET INDEXPROJECT SUMMARYOWNER / APPLICANTPHELAN DEVELOPMENT450 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVESUITE 405NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660PHONE: (949) 531-6627kdearmey@phelandevco.comARCHITECTCARLILE COATSWORTH ARCHITECTS, INC.18600 MACARTHUR BOULEVARDSUITE 300IRVINE, CA 92612PHONE: (949) 833-1930jamiep@ccarchitects.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTSCOTT PETERSONLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC.2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAYFALLBROOK, CA 92028PHONE: (760) 842-8993scott@splainc.comCIVIL ENGINEERSDH & ASSOCIATES27363 VIA INDUSTRIATEMECULA, CA 92590PHONE: (951) 683-3691steve@sdhinc.netELECTRICALVAL ELECTRIC, INC.1261 E. FRANCIS STREET, SUITE BONTARIO, CA 91761PHONE: (909) 923-0070waynelee@valelectric.comPROJECT TEAMSCALE: NOT TO SCALEARCHITECTURALA-1COVER SHEETA-2PRELIMINARY SITE PLANA-3BUILDING A FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-4BUILDING B FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLANA-5EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA-6BUILDING WALL SECTION AND TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONSLANDSCAPEL-1CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLANCIVIL1 OF 3CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TITLE SHEET2 OF 3CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN3 OF 3SECTIONSELECTRICALE-1 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC STUDY PLANE-2LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONSGROSS LOT AREA:204,297 SF(4.69 acres)TOTAL BUILDING AREA:68,695 SF26 September 202239,805 SFOFFICE:WAREHOUSE:2,000 SF38,370 SFLANDSCAPE PROVIDED:22.31%PARKING REQUIRED:79 SPACES65 SPACES14 SPACESOFFICE: 4,000 S.F. (1/300 S.F.)PARKING PROVIDED:79 SPACES*75 SPACESSTANDARD:4 SPACESACCESSIBLE:8 SPACESDOCK DOORS:2 SPACESGRADE LEVEL DOORS:BUILDING COVERAGE:39.95%APPLICABLE CODESALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLELOCAL STATE AND FEDERAL CODES REGULATION AND LAWS,INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:BUILDING2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODEMECHANICAL2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODEPLUMBING2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODEELECTRICAL2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODEFIRE2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODEACCESSIBILITY2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 11BWAREHOUSE: 64,695 S.F. (1/1,000 S.F.)BUILDING A:OFFICE:WAREHOUSE:BUILDING B:41,805 SF24,890 SF2,000 SF26,890 SF*INCLUSIVE8 SPACES*CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV:5 SPACES*FUTURE EV:APN:331-060-036 / 331-060-021LEGAL DESCRIPTION:THE LAND REFERRED TO HERIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OFTEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND ISDESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 21383 AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP ONFILE IN BOOK 167, PAGES 18 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE OF PARCELMAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.UTILITIESGAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANYPHONE: FRONTIERELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONSEWER: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICTWATER: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT800.427.2200844.720.1909800.611.1911200.422.7676800.422.4133LAND USE DESIGNATION:INDUSTRIAL PARKZONING DESIGNATION:LIOCCUPANCY GROUP:S-1: WAREHOUSE, B: OFFICECONSTRUCTION TYPE:V-BDESCRIPTION OF WORK:THIS DEVELOPMENT CONSISTS OF TWO SPECULATIVE TILT-UPCONCRETE WAREHOUSE BUILDING WITH A TOTAL OF 68,695 SF(INCLUDING 4,000 S.F. OF ACCESSORY OFFICE PER BUILDING).TRASH AND RECYCLING BINS WILL BE CONTAINED WITHINTRASH ENCLOSURES CONSTRUCTED OF CONCRETE WITHSTEEL GATES PER CR&R STANDARDS TO SCREEN BINS FROMVIEW.AUTOMOBILE PARKING IS PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE SITE.A FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS LANE THROUGH THE SITE WILL BEMAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES, GATES WILL INCLUDE KNOXPADLOCK TO PROVIDE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS.DIAZ ROADZ E R O D R I V E WI N C H E S T E R R O A D R I O N E D O R O A DPROJECTLOCATION A-1F.A.R.:39.95%4 SPACESMOTORCYCLE PARKING:4 SPACESBICYCLE PARKING:NET LOT AREA:171,966 SF(3.95 acres)(inclues the public r.o.w. to the centerline of the street)(includes the area within the legal parcel boundaries)(of net area)(of net area) 0'5'20'40'SCALE: 1" = 20'CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV CLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVCLEAN AIR /VANPOOL / EVPROPOSED WAREHOUSEBUILDING A41,805 sf2,000 sfFUTUREOFFICE2,000 sfFUTUREOFFICEPROPOSED WAREHOUSEBUILDING B26,890 sfGATE GATE GATE4 DOCK DOORS GL 4 DOCK DOORS GL WINCHESTER ROADDECORATIVE COLORPAVING AT DRIVEWAY,typicalEMPLOYEE OUTDOORBREAK AREA, typicalTRASH / RECYCLINGENCLOSURE WITHSOLID ROOF PERCR&R STANDARDS,typical - REFER TOENLARGED PLANAND ELEVATIONSON SHEET A-6.ADA PATH OFTRAVEL, typical9'x18' STANDARDPARKING SPACE, typicalCONCRETE SCREENWALL TO SCREENLOADING DOCKAREA, typicalVIEW OBSCURING TUBESTEEL GATE WITH KNOXLOCK FOR FIRE DEPARTMENTACCESS, typicalVIEW OBSCURING 8'TALL TUBE STEEL GATEWITH KNOX LOCK FORFIRE DEPARTMENTACCESS, typical456688865995LANDSCAPING COVERAGE:20%STANDARD:OFF STREET PARKING:9' x 18'DRIVE AISLE:24'FIRE LANE:24'0'OVERHANG:REQUIRED PARKING:WAREHOUSE:OFFICE:1/10001/30010 PARKING SPACES DOCK DOORS:PARKING PROVIDED:79 SPACES *75 SPACES4 SPACESSTANDARD:ACCESSIBLE:8 SPACESGRADE LEVEL DOORS:2 SPACESLANDSCAPING COVERAGE PROVIDED:38,370 (22.31%)26 September 2022MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE:40%MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT:50'0'INTERIOR SIDE YARDREAR YARD10'GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:INDUSTRIAL PARKCITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:BUILDING TYPE:INDUSTRIALMAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO:1.0ZONING DESIGNATION:LIMIN. BUILDING SETBACKS (yards):PARKING LOT SHADING REQ'S:SHADE TREES - 50%FRONT YARD (Adjacent to a street)20'ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONE40'LANDSCAPE AROUND PARKING:TREE REQUIREMENTS:1 TREE / 4 PARKINGTOTAL BUILDING AREA:68,695 SFPARKING REQUIRED:79 SPACESPROJECT INFORMATIONGROSS LOT AREA:204,297 SF(4.69 acres)BUILDING COVERAGE:39.95%OFFICE: 4,000 sf (1/300)14 SPACESWAREHOUSE: 64,695 sf (1/1000)65 SPACESSCHEME 4PRELIMINARY SITE PLANBUILDING A:41,805 SFBUILDING B:26,890 SF2,000 SFOFFICE:2,000 SFWAREHOUSE:OFFICE:24,890 SFACCESSORY STRUCTURE5'5'LANDSCAPE PLANTERS/FINGERS:WAREHOUSE:39,805 SF20% REQUIRED8 SPACES *CLEAN AIR / VANPOOL / EV:5 SPACES *FUTURE EV:* INCLUSIVE4A-2F.A.R.:39.95%FUTUREACCESSIBLE EVPARKING STALLFUTUREACCESSIBLE EVPARKING STALLEXISTING NATIVEVEGETATION ALONG SOUTHPROPERTY LINE TO REMAIN.PROTECT IN PLACE.40'60'50'40'60'50'210'160'60'60'60'180'50'50'50'52'52'52' 52'52'52' 40'24'40'20'S.B.24' FIRE ACCESS DRIVE 24'FIREACCESSDRIVE 24'FIREACCESSDRIVE20' S.B.24'FIREACCESSDRIVE24'FIREACCESSDRIVE12'-4"5'5'24' 24'18'9'18'9'18'9'18'9'18'9'18'9'18'9'Winchester Road and Diaz RoadTemecula, California18600 MacArthur Boulevard - Suite 300 - Irvine, CA 92612 - Phone: (949) 833-1930Carlile Coatsworth Architects, IncPHELANDEVELOPMENT450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405Newport Beach, CA 926604'x7' STANDARD MOTORCYCLEPARKING SPACE, typical4 SPACESMOTORCYCLE PARKING:4 SPACESBICYCLE PARKING:BICYCLE PARKING,typical AT EACHOFFICE ENTRY PLAZA2250'FULL ACCESSDRIVEWAYFULL ACCESSDRIVEWAYRIGHT IN - RIGHT OUTACCESS DRIVEWAYNET LOT AREA:171,966 SF(3.95 acres)(inclues the public r.o.w. to the centerline of the street)PROPOSED FUTUREDEMISING WALLBETWEEN OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSEPROPOSED FUTUREDEMISING WALLBETWEEN OFFICE ANDWAREHOUSE(includes the area within the legal parcel boundaries)(of net area)(of net area)PROPOSED FUTURE FIRE SPRINKLER FIRERISER ROOM - SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGNER DURINGCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE.PROPOSED FUTURE FIRE SPRINKLER FIRERISER ROOM - SHALL BE COORDINATEDWITH FIRE SPRINKLER DESIGNER DURINGCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE.PROPERTY LINEN54°14'10"E337.59'PROPERTY LINEl=294.87'R=900-00''PROPERTY LINEN61°58'18"W248.47'PROPERTY LINEN45°22'27"W773.64'PROPERTY LINE N35°45'50"W 284.40'N35°45'50"W 259.42'EXISTING PARCEL LINETO BE MERGED(N35°45'50"W 259.42')N35°45'41"W 231.76'EXISTING PARCEL LINETO BE MERGED(N35°45'41"W 231.76')N46°59'56"W219.21'EXISTING PARCEL LINETO BE MERGED(N46°59'56"W 219.21')GROUP TABLEMANUF: QCP CORP.MODEL: QR-42RC FOOD COURT W/ UMBRELLAFINISH: FRENCH GRAYUMBRELLA: 78" WHITE UMBRELLA W/ PULLEY LIFTSURFACE MOUNTADA GROUP TABLEMANUF: QCP CORP.MODEL: QR-42FC3-ADA FOOD COURT ADA TABLE W/UMBRELLAFINISH: FRENCH GRAYUMBRELLA: 78" WHITE UMBRELLA W/ PULLEY LIFTSURFACE MOUNTWASTE RECEPTACLE (TRASH)MANUF: QCP-CORPMODEL: CALIFORNIA SQUARE QS-CAL2534W-C21FINISH: FRENCH GRAY. GRAY LIDSURFACE MOUNTWASTE RECEPTACLE (RECYCLING)MANUF: QCP-CORPMODEL: CALIFORNIA SQUARE QS-CAL2534W-C21(RECYCLING LID)FINISH: FRENCH GRAY. BLUE LIDSURFACE MOUNTPROPOSED PARCEL LINE PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0621, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR TWO INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 68,700 SQUARE FEET (41,805 SQUARE FEET AND 26,890 SQUARE FEET) ON 3.95 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 250-FEET WEST OF THE WINCHESTER AND DIAZ ROAD INTERSECTION, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15332 Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 6, 2022, Daniel Lee filed Planning Application No. PA22-0621 a Development Plan, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on December 7, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0621, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.05.010.F (Development Plan): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because industrial buildings are an allowable use within the Light Industrial district. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because industrial buildings are an allowable use within the Light Industrial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 3.95 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project was required to go through the Habitat Assessment and Negotiation Strategy (HANS) process since the project site is located within a Multi Species Habitation Conservation Strategy (MSHCP) criteria cell. After review by the Regional Conservation Authority and State and Federal agencies, a Joint Project Review was issued (JPR 22-04-13-01) that determined the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Light Industrial zoning district, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan, and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0621, a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of December, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of December, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE Planning Application Number: PA22-0621 By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not limited to) any referenced documents, local state, or federal regulations, statement of operations, hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and understand them. I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions. Property Owner Printed Name _________________________ Applicant Printed Name _________________________ Property Owner Signature & Date ___________________________ Applicant Signature & Date ___________________________ Parcel Number(s): 909-310-002 909-310-003 909-310-004 909-310-005 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22 -0621 Winchester & Diaz Industrial DP: a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection. Assessor's Parcel No.: 909-310-002 909-310-003 909-310-004 909-310-005 Commercial MSHCP Category: Business Park/Industrial Park DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Industrial/Business Park N/A (Not a Residential Project) December 7, 2022 December 7, 2022 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not Located Within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 15 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 15 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 5. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 6. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 7. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 8. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. The building shall incorporate “four-sided architecture” that incorporates contrasting painted concrete, anodized aluminum canopy and façade accents, and a prominent entrance to the building featuring taller walls and metal soffits over windows. 9. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 10. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 11. Page 3 of 15 Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 12. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 13. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 14. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 15. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 16. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at their sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development.” 17. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 18. Page 4 of 15 Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 19. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 20. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 21. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 22. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 23. MSHCP Consistency. Per the attached Regional Conservation Authority Joint Project Review (#22-04-13-01), to avoid and minimize impacts to areas proposed for conservation, all measures identified in the Joint Project Review shall be addressed by the project applicant/developer, including measures addressing Rough Step, item “b.” (Pages 4-5) for Rough Step, “a.” (Pages 6-7) for Section 6.1.2, Riparian/Riverine, “c” (Pages 7-8) for Section 6.3.2, Burrowing Owl, “d.”  (Pages 8-9) for Section 6.1.4 Urban/Wildlands Guidelines of the MSHCP, and “c.” (Pages 9-11) for MSHCP Volume I, Appendix C. 24. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 25. Page 5 of 15 Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 26. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 27. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 28. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 29. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 30. Page 6 of 15 Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 31. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 32. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 33. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 34. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 35. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. A copy of the Precise Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 36. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc. match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 38. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 39. Page 7 of 15 Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 40. Outside Agencies Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. The applicant shall submit to DEH plan review fees, provide will serve letters, and conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for review and approval. 41. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 42. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 43. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 44. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 45. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 46. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following vehicular movements restrictions: a. The future easterly driveway access onto Winchester Road from Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 21383 shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out movement. 47. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 48. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Parcel Merger. The Developer shall submit a Parcel Merger application to Public Works for review and approval. 49. Lot Line Adjustment. The Developer shall submit a Lot Line Adjustment application to Public Works for review and approval. 50. Southern California Edison Quitclaim. A recorded copy of the quitclaim of the Southern California Edison (SCE) easement shall be provided to Public Works. 51. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 52. Page 8 of 15 Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board (401 certification), Army Corps of Engineers (404 certification), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Section 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement), RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. 53. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 54. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 55. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 56. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 57. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 58. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 59. Page 9 of 15 Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 60. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24-hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 61. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 62. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 63. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 64. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 65. Reciprocal Access & Parking Easement. The developer shall obtain an easement for reciprocal access and parking between the properties. The easement information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. The reciprocal access and parking agreement shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. 66. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 67. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 68. Page 10 of 15 American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 69. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 70. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 71. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 72. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Parcel Merger. A recorded copy of the Parcel Merger shall be submitted to Public Works. 73. Lot Line Adjustment. A recorded copy of the Lot Line Adjustment shall be submitted to Public Works. 74. Reciprocal Access & Parking Easement. A recorded copy of the reciprocal access and parking easement shall be submitted to Public Works. 75. Floodplain/Floodway Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA-approved LOMR shall be submitted to Public Works. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. 76. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 77. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 78. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 79. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 80. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 81. Page 11 of 15 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the Developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 82. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 83. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 84. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 85. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 86. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 87. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 88. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 89. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 90. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 91. Page 12 of 15 Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 92. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 93. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5). 94. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 95. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for this commercial project. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 96. Occupancy Management. Per the California Building Code and California Fire Code, along with Title 19 for Public Safety, the occupancy for this establishment must be complied with at all times. The owner will be responsible for assigning designees to count patrons as they enter and exit. At any given time, if the fire department and/or building department find you in violation of this they will be required to either close the facility entirely, have the owner remove patrons until the occupant load is at or less than allowed and request fines to be issued to the owner. If there is continued violations occurring within the establishment the building department and/or fire department will recommend that the city planning department revoke the owners CUP. 97. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 98. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 99. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 100. Page 13 of 15 Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 101. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 102. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish electronic plans of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted electronically and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 103. Required Submittals (Structural Protection). Plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureaus for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Chapter 49). 104. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 105. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 106. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 107. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 108. Knox Box. A “Knox -Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 109. Page 14 of 15 Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 110. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 111. High Piled Stock. Speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of California Fire Code Chapter 32 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association Standards (CFC Chapter 32 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 112. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable 113. Page 15 of 15 1 City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application Number PA22-0621, a Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres located on the south side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Jaime Cardenas at email: jaime.cardenas@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt 1 City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Winchester & Diaz Industrial DP PA22-0621 Description of Project: A Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres Project Location: South side of Winchester Road, approximately 250-feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection Applicant/Proponent: Daniel Lee (Phelan Develoment Co.) The Planning Commission approved the above-described project on December 7, 2022 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: (Section 15332, Class 32, In- Fill Development Projects) Other: Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because industrial buildings are an allowable use within the Light Industrial district. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. 2 The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 3.95 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project was required to go through the Habitat Assessment and Negotiation Strategy (HANS) process since the project site is located within a Multi Species Habitation Conservation Strategy (MSHCP) criteria cell. After review by the Regional Conservation Authority and State and Federal agencies, a Joint Project Review was issued (JPR 22-04-13-01) that determined the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Light Industrial zoning district, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan, and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Contact Person/Title: Jaime Cardenas, Assistant Planner Telephone Number (951) 240-4215 Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA - 41000 Main Street- Temecula, CA 92590 – TemeculaCA.gov A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter(s) described below: Case No.: PA22-0621 Applicant: Daniel Lee Project Location: 3.95-acre site located along the south side of Winchester Road approximately 250- feet west of the Winchester and Diaz Road intersection. Proposal: A Development Plan application for two industrial buildings totaling approximately 68,700 square feet (41,805 square feet and 26,890 square feet) on 3.95 acres Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 15332, Class 32, In- Fill Development Projects Case Planner: Jaime Cardenas, 951-240-4215 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: December 7, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 1 Project Information Permittee: City of Temecula Case Information: PR22-0138 Winchester & Diaz Industrial Buildings Site Acreage: 4.14 acres (all permanent impact; on-site 4.02 acres and off-site 0.12 acre), of which 3.88 acres1 (on-site 3.76 acres and off-site 0.12 acre) are located within the Criteria Area2 Portion of Site Proposed for MSHCP Conservation Area: 0 Criteria Consistency Review Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements with implementation of the measures presented in these Findings (including any within the project information provided to the RCA by the Permittee for this JPR). Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 Area Plan: Southwest APN Sub-Unit Cell Group Cell 909-310-002 909-310-003 909-310-004 909-310-005 Right-of-way SU1 – Murrieta Creek N/A 6782 6783 Project Information a. Project Documentation. JPR submittal materials provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application Form (March 11, 2022), a HANS Application (March 18, 2022), a revised Habitat Assessment and Multiple Species Habitat Consistency Analysis (Analysis) prepared by Ruth Villalobos and Associates, Inc. (July 1, 2022), a revised Site Plan (May 10, 2022), and GIS shapefiles. b. Project Location. The proposed project is located southwest of Interstate 15 and Murrieta Creek. It is located along Winchester Road, south of Diaz Road, and north of Rio Nedo Road in the City of Temecula 1 Within the area of 3.88-acre permanent impacts within the Criteria Area, tree trimming would result in 0.03-acre of overlapping temporary impacts. Refer to Section 6.1.2 of these JPR Findings and Exhibit E for details. 2 Joint Project Review (JPR) only occurs within MSHCP Criteria Cells. Any portion of the project that extends beyond the Criteria is not included as part of these JPR Findings. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 2 within Riverside County (Exhibit A). The project site includes assessor’s parcel numbers (APNs) 909-310- 002, -003, -004, and -005. It is located in the southwestern portion of the MSHCP Area (Exhibit B). c. Project Description. The proposed project includes construction of two warehouse buildings. One building is 41,805 square feet with 2,000 square feet of office space and four dock doors. The other building is 26,890 square feet with 2,000 square feet of office space and four dock doors. Off-site improvements required include a new driveway and utility connections to existing utilities in Winchester Road. These off-site improvements will occur within the Winchester Road right-of-way between the northern boundary of the project and the edge of pavement and curb of the existing Winchester Road. The proposed project site, which includes the entire development footprint, is approximately 4.14 acres. The approximate 4.14-acre proposed project site includes on-site development of 4.02 acres and off-site improvements of approximately 0.12 acre (Exhibit E). Of the 4.14-acre project, only 3.88 acres are located within MSHCP Criteria Area (specifically, Cells 6782 and 6783), and as such, only 3.88-acre proposed development (on-site 3.76 acres and off-site 0.12 acre) is the subject of these JPR Findings (hereafter referred to as “project site”). The 3.88-acre project site consists of 3.76 acres of proposed development and 0.12 acre of off-site improvements consisting of driveways and utility connections. No fuel modification or weed abatement zones are proposed. Information on staging of equipment and construction materials was not provided with in the JPR application submittals. The site is surrounded by an industrial warehouse, business and medical offices, commercial buildings, and a drainage tributary to Murrieta Creek adjacent to the southeastern border of the site. The topography of the site is relatively flat. According to the Analysis, vegetation communities within the 3.88-acre site include disturbed habitat dominated by non-native grasses, ornamental plantings, and riparian trees (overhanging tree canopy). Baseline vegetation communities (1994) within the site consist of grasslands and developed or disturbed land (Exhibit C). As noted above, a tributary drainage to Murrieta Creek is located outside of the project site and adjacent to the southeastern portion. This drainage contains riparian vegetation (i.e., arroyo willow tree canopy) that overhangs within 0.03 acre of the project site. Soil series within the project site include Chino silt loam, drained, saline-alkali and Grangeville fine sandy loam, saline-alkali, 0 to 5 percent slopes (Exhibit D). None of these soils are directly related to or support Narrow Endemic Plant Species, Criteria Area Plant Species, or Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly which are further discussed in Section 6.1.3 and 6.3.2 below. The proposed project would result in 3.88 acres of permanent impacts, specifically on-site 3.76 acres and off-site 0.12 acre. Within the area of on-site 3.76-acre permanent impacts, there would be 0.03-acre of overlapping temporary impacts associated with riparian tree trimming (Exhibit E). The overlapping 0.03- acre of temporary impact is further discussed in Section 6.1.2 below. The project is not adjacent to any existing conservation area. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 3 Relation to Reserve Assembly a. Reserve Assembly Summary. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, “Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 [PCL-13] consists of Murrieta Creek, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. This Constrained Linkage connects Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Proposed Linkage 10 in the south. This Linkage is constrained along most of its length by existing urban Development and agricultural use and the planned land use surrounding the Linkage consists of city (Murrieta and Temecula). Therefore, care must be taken to maintain high quality riparian Habitat within the Linkage and along the edges for species such as yellow warbler, yellow-breasted chat, and least Bell's vireo, which have key populations located in or along the creek. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also important to western pond turtle and arroyo chub in this area. Guidelines Pertaining to Urban/Wildlands Interface for the management of edge factors such as lighting, urban runoff, toxics, and domestic predators are presented in Section 6.1.4 of this [MSHCP] document.” The proposed project site occurs within Independent Cells 6782 and Cell 6783. A portion of the project site (on-site 1.75 acres and off-site 0.08 acre, totaling 1.83 acres) is located within Independent Cell 6782. As stated in Section 3.3.15 of the MSHCP for Cell 6782, “Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13. Conservation within this Cell will focus on the existing Murrieta Creek channel and adjacent grassland habitat to the extent feasible. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #6656 to the northwest and to grassland and adjacent habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #6783 to the east. Conservation within this Cell is approximately 5% of the Cell focusing in the northeastern portion of the Cell.” Cell 6782 totals approximately 198 acres. Using the conservation goal (5%), approximately 10 acres are described for conservation within this approximate 198-acre Cell. To date, approximately 141 acres have been developed or are approved for development in this Cell, which includes the 1.83-acre proposed project acreage and 17 acres of covered roads acreage. With no lands conserved to date, approximately 10 acres are still needed for conservation in order to achieve the conservation goal of 10 acres. There are approximately 57 undeveloped acres available within the Cell, of which approximately 57 acres are potentially available within areas described for conservation (specifically PCL-13). In summary, with no lands conserved to date and 57 undeveloped acres potentially available for conservation that could also functionally contribute to PCL-13, Cell 6782 could achieve the goal of 10 acres, meaning that it is possible for this Cell to achieve its Reserve Assembly goal. Furthermore, the proposed project is located within the southeastern corner of the Cell, outside of the area described for conservation. A portion of the project site (on-site 2.01 acres and off-site 0.04 acre, totaling 2.05 acres) is located within Independent Cell 6783. As stated in Section 3.3.15 of the MSHCP for Cell 6783, “Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13. Conservation within this Cell will focus on the existing Murrieta Creek channel and adjacent riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat to the extent feasible. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to grassland and adjacent habitat RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 4 proposed for conservation in Cell #6782 to the west and to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #6890 to the south. Conservation within this Cell will be approximately 5% of the Cell focusing in the southwestern portion of the Cell.” Cell 6783 totals approximately 192 acres. Using the conservation goal (5%), approximately 10 acres are described for conservation within this approximate 192-acre Cell. To date, approximately 170 acres have been developed or are approved for development in this Cell, which includes the 2.05-acre proposed project acreage and 28 acres of covered roads acreage. With no lands conserved to date, approximately 10 acres are still needed for conservation in order to achieve the conservation goal of 10 acres. There are approximately 22 undeveloped acres available within the Cell, of which approximately 22 acres are potentially available within areas described for conservation. In summary, with no lands conserved to date and 10 undeveloped acres potentially available for conservation that could also functionally contribute to PCL-13, Cell 6783 could achieve the goal of 10 acres, meaning that it is possible for this Cell to achieve its Reserve Assembly goal. Although the proposed project is located within the southwestern corner of the Cell, which is the area described for conservation, the proposed project is not within the area described as the focus for conservation within this Cell (i.e., existing Murrieta Creek channel and adjacent riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat). The project site is surrounded by existing development, Winchester Road and Diaz Road, and an open drainage that is a tributary to Murrieta Creek bordering the southeastern property line. The open tributary drainage goes underground for almost 400 feet immediately prior to its confluence into Murrieta Creek causing some functional disconnect to PCL-13. The project site itself does not connect to PCL-13 nor contribute functionally to this Reserve feature. Conservation at the site would not provide any biological resource function or value, nor impede the conservation goals for PCL-13, nor result in issues regarding biological resource fragmentation. b. Rough Step. The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 5. As stated in Section 3 of the MSHCP 2020 Annual Report, “Rough Step Unit 5 encompasses 91,734 acres within the southwestern corner of western Riverside County and includes the Santa Rosa Plateau, the Tenaja Corridor, and Murrieta Creek (see Figure 4-6, Rough Step Unit #5). This Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the east, San Diego County to the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest to the west and north. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 5 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-8, Rough Step Unit 5 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals. Through 2020, a total of 534 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 5. Losses to this unit total 934 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 185 acres of coastal sage scrub, 150 acres of grasslands, 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 212 acres of woodlands and forests. The riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation category is out of rough step by 0.39 acre. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 5 The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring riparian scrub, woodland, forest back into Rough Step for Unit 5. The total acreage needed is 2.23 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest.” Although the 2021 Annual Report has not been finalized, the remaining development allowance for Rough Step Unit 5 as of the end of 2021 are as follows: 190 acres of coastal sage scrub; 243 acres of grassland; less than 1 acre (specifically 0.11-acre) of riparian scrub, woodland, and forest; 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and 214 acres of woodlands and forests. Baseline vegetation (1994) for the area of the site located within Cells 6782 and 6783 consists of grassland and developed or disturbed land; however, developed or disturbed lands are not tracked for rough step (Exhibit C). Based on the 2021 preliminary numbers, grasslands have a remaining development allowance of 243 acres. Therefore, based on the above discussion the proposed project does not conflict with Rough Step. The Rough Step Unit 5 development allowance may have changed by the time this project submits for a grading permit. As such, the RCA provides the following required Measure to ensure the City does not exceed Rough Step allowances: ROUGH STEP MEASURE. In accordance with Section 6.7 in Volume I of the Plan, it is the Permittees responsibility that [i]f the rough step rule is not met during any analysis period (performed annually by the RCA), the Permittees must conserve appropriate lands supporting a specified vegetation community within the analysis unit to bring the Plan back into the parameters of the rule prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation community for which the rule was not achieved. The Permittee is encouraged to consult with the RCA on current rough step allowances prior to working with project applicants developing grading plans. The Permittee must not cause additional loss of any rough step vegetation that is out of balance. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Permittee will confirm with the RCA that the Project will not impact out - of-balance Rough Step vegetation in the applicable rough step unit. Other Plan Requirements (MSHCP Volume I) Section 6.1.2 – Was Riparian/Riverine/Vernal Pool Mapping or Information Provided? Yes. There is 0.03 acre of riparian/riverine areas (i.e., overhanging arroyo willow tree canopy) on the project site. There are no vernal pools on the project site, and the well-drained soils present on the site do not support habitat considered suitable for fairy shrimp. There is no suitable riparian bird habitat within the project site; however, outside of and adjacent to the project site is a drainage feature containing riparian trees with some branches overhanging over the project site (i.e., 0.03 acres of riparian/riverine areas). Section 6.1.3 – Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 6 Section 6.3.2 – Was Additional Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located in a Criteria Area Species Survey Area for plants. The project site is not located in Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Areas for amphibians or small mammals. The project site does not support Delhi sands (Exhibit D) or in areas that would trigger additional review for Delhi sands flower-loving fly. However, the project site is located in an Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area for burrowing owl. Section 6.1.4 – Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided? Yes. The property is not located adjacent to existing conservation areas. However, the project site is adjacent to an open drainage feature that is a tributary flowing downstream into Murrieta Creek, which is approximately 400 feet from the project site. Murrieta Creek and its surrounding area is proposed MSHCP Conservation Area and a Section 6.1.2 riparian/riverine resource. Therefore, Section 6.1.4 measures are applicable. Comments on Other Plan Requirements: a. Section 6.1.2. The following discusses each requirement under this policy. Riparian/Riverine. The Analysis assessed the project site for potential natural drainage features, ponded areas, water bodies, or associated riparian vegetation that may be considered riparian/riverine habitat. According to the Analysis, the project site is primarily comprised of non-native herbaceous plant species; however, there is approximately 0.03 acre of arroyo willow tree branches overhanging over the project site from an adjacent drainage feature and is considered riparian/riverine habitat. Trimming of overhanging lateral branches (approximately seven feet in length and 0.75 inch to one inch in diameter; total area of 0.03 acres) will be needed during construction and installation of the drive aisle, curb, and tilt up wall. Future trimming of these tree branches will not be needed after installation of the wall. According to the Analysis, the tree branch trimming would not substantially damage the health of or kill the tree, nor change the functions and values of the riparian vegetation adjacent to the project site, and the trimming is considered a temporary impact. Thus, there will be no permanent impacts to riparian/riverine areas. Due to the minimal temporary impact, mitigation for this temporary impact would not be required. Vernal Pools/Fairy Shrimp. The Analysis assessed the project site for soil types, wetlands, and vegetation indicative of the presence of vernal pools. The site consists of well-drained soils, which are not suitable for the formation of vernal pools, and no wetland vegetation was observed on site. No evidence of vernal pools or other wetland features were observed on site. There were no other features (e.g., road ruts, depressions, etc.) observed on the project site that could provide habitat for fairy shrimp. Therefore, focused surveys for fairy shrimp were not warranted. Riparian Birds. The Analysis assessed the project site for potential natural drainage features, ponded areas, water bodies, or associated riparian habitat that may be considered riparian/riverine habitat. According to the Analysis, the project site is comprised of disturbed habitat with non-native grasses and RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 7 ornamental vegetation. There is approximately 0.03-acre of riparian habitat comprised of overhanging arroyo willow branches within the project site. According to the Analysis, below the overhanging arroyo willow branches is disturbed habitat (i.e., disturbed non-native grasses) that does not contain suitable habitat that would support riparian birds. According to the Analysis, riparian vegetation associated with the drainage feature is a narrow strip containing disturbed understory that lacks a dense understory shrub layer. The Analysis concludes this overhanging riparian habitat is not considered suitable least Bell’s vireo breeding habitat. In addition, this riparian habitat is not suitable habitat for southwestern willow flycatcher or western yellow-billed cuckoo. Therefore, no suitable habitat was found on site that would support riparian birds and focused riparian bird surveys were not war ranted. Because some riparian habitat is present adjacent to the site and on the site (i.e., overhanging arroyo willow branches), and least Bell’s vireo could briefly utilize this habitat as stopover habitat, the following measure is applicable to the project: TREE TRIMMING MEASURE. To ensure avoidance of indirect impacts to nesting birds and least Bell’s vireo, if present, on-site trimming of overhanging arroyo willow branches during construction will be completed outside of the nesting bird season (February 1 to August 31) and outside of the least Bell’s vireo breeding season (mid-March to September 30) in accordance with the MSHCP. Based on the information provided in the Analysis, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. b. Section 6.1.3 Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA) Plants. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area. Therefore, surveys for NEPSSA plants were not warranted. Based on the information provided in the Analysis , the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. c. Section 6.3.2. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The project site is not located in a Criteria Area Species Survey Area for plants nor a designated amphibian or small mammal survey area. Burrowing Owl. According to the Analysis, burrowing owl surveys were conducted in accordance with the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions (RCA 2006). A Step I (habitat assessment) was conducted by Ruth Villalobos and Associates, Inc. on January 13, 2022. Suitable burrowing owl habitat (non-native grasslands) was observed within the proposed project site; therefore, a Step II-A (focused burrow survey) was conducted concurrently with the habitat assessment. No burrows (i.e., 4 inches in diameter or other suitable man-made structures) with the potential to support burrowing owls were detected during the burrow survey. Due to the lack of suitable burrows for burrowing owls on site, Step II-B surveys (focused burrowing owl surveys) were not warranted. Because suitable habitat for burrowing is present on the site, and owls could colonize the site prior to the start of construction, the following measure is applicable to the project: BURROWING OWL MEASURE. Due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat, a 30-day pre- construction survey for burrowing owls is required prior to initial ground-disturbing activities RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 8 (including vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging, grading, etc.) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground-disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground-disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and the Wildlife Agencies, and will need to coordinate further with RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance. If ground -disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre-construction survey will again be necessary to ensure burrowing owl has not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If burrowing owl is found, the same coordination described above will be necessary. Based on the information provided by in the Analysis, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. d. Section 6.1.4. The project site is not adjacent to existing Conservation Areas. As previously discussed, despite the project site being within the area described for conservation within Cell 6783, the site is not within the area described as the focus for conservation within this Cell (i.e., existing Murrieta Creek channel and adjacent riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat). Additionally, the site does not provide any biological resource function or value for PCL-13. However, it is important to preserve the integrity of undeveloped areas in the vicinity of the project site, which could contain MSHCP resources, and proposed Conservation Areas (e.g., Murrieta Creek) downstream of the tributary drainage adjacent to the project site. The guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 related to controlling adverse effects for develo pment adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area should be considered, as applicable, by the Permittee in their actions relative to the project. SECTION 6.1.4 MEASURE. i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Conservation Areas. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm downstream biological resources or ecosystems. ii. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts, such as manure, that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, Habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest risk is from landscaping fertilization overspray and runoff. iii. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area and the avoided are a on site to protect species from direct night lighting. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 9 iv. Proposed noise-generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas, shall incorporate setbacks, berms, or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations, and guidelines related to land use noise standards. v. Avoid use of invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in approving landscape plans for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, including avoidance areas. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas and designated avoidance areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls, topography, and other features. vi. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate, in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass, or dumping into existing and future MSHCP Conservation Areas. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage, and/or other appropriate mechanisms. vii. Manufactured slopes associated with proposed site development shall not extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. viii. Weed abatement and fuel modification activities are not permitted in the Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas. e. Appendix C. The following best management practices (BMPs), as applicable, shall be implemented for the duration of construction: APPENDIX C MEASURE. i. A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished. ii. Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance with RWQCB requirements. iii. The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 10 iv. The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral limits of disturbance on either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by the biologist prior to initiation of work. v. Projects should be designed to avoid the placement of equipment and personnel within the stream channel or on sand and gravel bars, banks, and adjacent upland habitats used by target species of concern. vi. Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in sensitive habitats should be timed to avoid the breeding season of riparian species identified in MSHCP Global Species Objective No. 7. vii. When stream flows must be diverted, the diversions shall be conducted using sandbags or other methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing of other sediment trapping materials shall be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the transport of sediments off site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected shall be cleaned out in a manner that prevents the sediment from reentering the stream. Care shall be exercised when removing silt fences, as feasible, to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the stream. viii. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFG, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas. ix. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other similar debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks. x. The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint. xi. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species. xii. Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently removed from the site to the extent feasible. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 11 xiii. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s). xiv. Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas. xv. The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects including any restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions, including these BMPs. LJL/TC RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-04-13-01 Date: 08/11/22 12 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Rough Step 5 Rough Step 6 REGIONAL M ALLLOOPRDN G ENERALKEARNYRDCAL LEMADERO VENE T ODRMARGARITARDRORIPAUGHRDMA D I S O N A V E R A N CHOCALIFORNIARDME R C E D E S S T P A U B A R DVIAN O RTECHERRY STHUMBER DRFIG STSIXTH STA CACI AWAYAVENIDA DEL ORO RANCONCENTERBLVDHA Y E S A V E RAMSEYCTOVERLANDDR YNEZ RDGRANADO PLD I A Z RD VIA LA VIDAC ALLECORVETAMIRALOMADROL DT OWN F R ONTST AGENASTAVE NIDAS O NOMAC H A THAMLN F E L IX V A L D E Z AVE VIASANTA R O S A MORENORDRANC H O V IS T A R D CALLE HALCON JA N V A L E R I E R D C O L I NAVERDE AVE NI DA C I MA D E L S OL PREECELNCHANTEMARWAYELCHAVAL P L BU CK E YERDAVENIDAVIS T A LADE R ASELBYCIRMEADOWLARKRIDGE VILLAALTUR ASD R S A N T A C E CILIADRAVENIDABARCAE A G L ENE S T R D COSMICD R FIFTH STORMSBY RD DI A Z R DDELUZRD RYCRESTDRSTONEWOODRDRIDGE P A R K D R CHESTNUTDREQUITYDR VA I L B R OOKDR FOURTH STVIARENATECALLEREVAAUTOMALLPKWY MAIN STCALLENA C ID O ELINDARDTIE R R AVISTAR D ODESSADRC O R T E FRESCA LA C RUZDR B U S I N ESSPARKDR D E L R EYRD C O M M E R C E C E N T E R D R BUTTERNUTDRSANDIACREEKDRVIAPUESTADEL S O L DIAZ RDVIA IN D U S T RIA AD A M S A V E M A D I S O N A V E DO U G L A S S A V E THIRD STAV ENI DA V E RDEWINCHESTERRDVIAVUELTASST A N F O R D D R CALLECAPISTRANOPEARSTALCALDE LNS O L A N A WAY ARJ UNAAVEENTERPRISECIRW LOS N O G A L E S RDLON G VAL L EY DR NICOLE LN JO H N W A Y N E R D SKEI T HWAYHO B I E C I R AVENIDADELSOL CORTECANTERAMORAGARDCORNINGPLROANOAKESTCORT ERIALTOCAMINOCAMPOSVERDESVIAMONTEZUMADELRIO R DRIONEDO LACOLIMARDJE F F E R S O N A V E LYNDIEL N AVOYER AVEAVENIDAALVARADOVIAVEGAMA N C E R D PR ADERAWAY ELM STR E M ING TO NAVECHERRY STPUJ O L S T CARMELITACI R RANCHOHIGHLANDD RBUECKINGDRVIACEJITAMILES STCAMINO SECOROICK DRSKYWOOD DRSYCA M ORE ME S ARDREAGAN WAYP A R KPLAZA L NSARAH WAYSHAW LNSUGARBERRY LNS I NGLE O AK D R VIA L ASCOLIN AS RANCHOWAYVIA MEDEIROS VISTADERESACAHA Y E S A V E EASTMANDRWA S H I N G T O N A V E WESTERNB Y P A S S C O RRIDOR C OUNTYCENTERDRENTERPRISECIRNDENDY PKWYZEVO DRCity ofMurrieta City ofTemecula 6887 6658 6781 7005 7075 6782 7078 6656 6779 7021 6890 7079 7066 6780 6659 6891 0 7076 6888 7077 0 0 7069 6783 7008 §¨¦15 ÄÄ79 Cell Group J'Cell Group K' Cell Group L' Cell Group M'Cell Group M' I SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2022; County of Riverside 2022; Esri Basemap 2022. Map created on 8/10/2022. EXHIBIT A JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 - Regional01,000 2,000 Feet r14495 Permittee: City of Temecula (PR22-0138) Winchester & Diaz Rd Industrial Buildings G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22041301\JPR22041301-ExhibitA_Regional.mxdOrangeCounty San DiegoCounty San Bernardino County EasternRiversideCounty WesternRiversideCounty JPR Proposed Project Boundary Private Development Public Development Proposed/Future MSHCP Conservation Other Conservation Avoidance Area No Improvement MSHCP Conserved Land MSHCP Conservation Easement Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Land MSHCP Covered Road Rough Step Unit Cell Group Criteria Cell City Boundary Parcel Boundary Highway Centerline !!! !!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!·|}þ17 !"#$51 !"#$51 !"#$51 !"#$512 ·|}þ06 !"#$10 !"#$10 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ247 ·|}þ243 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ19 ·|}þ19 !"#$51 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ97 ·|}þ06 ·|}þ173 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ243 ·|}þ97 !"#$512 !"#$512 ·|}þ06 ·|}þ97 ·|}þ47 !"#$51 16 20 3 21 65 8 1 15 6 6 20 18 1 14 8 4 5 21 179 7 1 21 22 10 15 11 14 4 11 1 17 13 11 24 19 18 14 7 7 16 9 12 10 12 3 4 23 13 8 D D K B EB EA L MA I A A B A K C F A LG H D J B K C B B C 1 2 3 4 3 5 4 7 1 2 6 1 2 4 7 65 3 5 6 7 7 JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 - Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages EXHIBIT B SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (WRC-RCA). Map created on 8/10/2022 r14495 Permittee: City of Temecula (PR22-0138) Winchester & Diaz Rd Industrial Buildings G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22041301\JPR22041301-ExhibitB_MSHCP_SchematicCoresLinkages.mxd!(^JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 Proposed Linkages Constrained Linkage Linkage !!!!!!Existing Channel Existing Cores & Linkages Constrained Linkage Core Linkage Noncontiguous Habitat Block Proposed Cores & Habitat Blocks Core Proposed Extension of Existing Cores Noncontiguous Habitat Block I 0 2 4 Miles DIAZ R D RIO NEDOWINCHESTER RD6782 6783 6890 JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 - Vegetation EXHIBIT C SOURCE: WRC-RCA MSHCP Baseline Vegetation (1994). Map created on 8/10/2022. I 0 50 100 Feet r14495 Permittee: City of Temecula (PR22-0138) Winchester & Diaz Rd Industrial Buildings JPR Proposed Project Boundary Area Not Within Criteria CellVegetation Types Developed or Disturbed Land Grassland Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Criteria Cell Centerline G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22041301\JPR22041301-ExhibitC_Vegetation.mxdJPR Proposed Project Boundary Area Not Within Criteria Cell Vegetation Types Developed or Disturbed Land Grassland Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub Criteria Cell Centerline Vegetation Types: Developed or Disturbed Land Grassland Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub DIAZ R D RIO NEDOWINCHESTER RD6782 6783 6890 JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 - Soil EXHIBIT DI050100 Feet r14495 Permittee: City of Temecula (PR22-0138) Winchester & Diaz Rd Industrial Buildings SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2020; County of Riverside 2020; USDA/NRCS Soils 2017 G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22041301\JPR22041301-ExhibitD_Soil.mxdJPR Proposed Project Boundary Area Not Within Criteria Cell Soil Types Chino silt loam, drained, saline-alkali Grangeville fine sandy loam, drained, 0 to 2 percent sl opes Grangeville fine sandy loam, saline-alkali, 0 to 5 percent slopes Criteria Cell Centerline Rough Step 5 DIAZ R D RIO NEDOWINCHESTER RD6782 6890 0 6783 JPR Log No. 22-04-13-01 - Project Detail EXHIBIT E G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22041301\JPR22041301-ExhibitE_ProjectDetail.mxdI050100 Feet r14495 Permittee: City of Temecula (PR22-0138) Winchester & Diaz Rd Industrial Buildings SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2022; County of Riverside 2022; Esri Basemap 2022. Map created on 8/10/2022. * Overhanging riparian branch tree trimming overlapping with permanent impact on the ground. JPR Proposed Project Boundary Area Not Within Criteria Cell Development Impact Off-Site Permanent On-Site Temporary* On-Site Permanent Criteria Cell MSHCP Covered Road Parcel Boundary Centerline