HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022 Old Town Specific PlanCity of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
OOLLDD TTOOWWNN
SSPPEECCIIFFIICC
PPLLAANN
CCiittyy ooff TTeemmeeccuullaa––MMaayy 2255,, 22001100
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
Comprehensively revised by the
City Of Temecula
Adopted by City Council on May 25, 2010
Ordinance No. 10-09: Specific Plan Amendment
Ordinance No. 10-10: Zone Change
Clerical revisions made August 11, 2010
Originally Adopted on February 22, 1994
Ordinance No. 94-05
Previous Revisions Adopted:
January 23, 1996 Ordinance No. 96-01
May 13, 1997 Ordinance No. 97-06
July 13, 1999 Ordinance No. 99-12
October 10, 2000 Ordinance No. 00-11
August 24, 2004 Ordinance No. 04-08
June 13, 2006
September 5, 2017
May 26, 2020
November 29, 2022
Ordinance No. 06-07
Resolution No. 17-56
Resolution No. 2020-32
Resolution No. 2022-90
OOLLDD TTOOWWNN
SSPPEECCIIFFIICC
PPLLAANN
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan AAcckknnoowwlleeddggeemmeennttss City Council: • Jeff Comerchero, Mayor • Ron Roberts, Mayor Pro Tem • Chuck Washington, Councilmember • Maryann Edwards, Councilmember • Mike Naggar, Councilmember Planning Commission: • Carl Carey, Chairman • Pat Kight, Vice Chairman • John Telesio, Planning Commissioner • Ron Guerriero, Planning Commissioner • Stan Harter, Planning Commissioner • Dennis Chiniaeff, Planning Commissioner (retired) Old Town Local Review Board: • John (Jack) Eden, Chairman • Gary Watts, Vice Chairman • Albert Blair, Board Member • Craig Puma, Board Member • Peg Moore, Board Member • William Harker, Board Member (retired) Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee: • Albert Blair, Committee Member • Pat Kight, Committee Member • Peg Moore, Committee Member • Ron Guerriero, Committee Member • Dennis Chiniaeff, Committee Member (retired) • William Harker, Committee Member (retired) City of Temecula Executive Staff: • Shawn Nelson, City Manager • Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager • Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager • Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager • Peter Thorson , City Attorney City of Temecula-Lead Planning, Redevelopment and Public Works Staff: • Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment • Stuart Fisk, Senior Planner – Project Manager • Katie Innes, Assistant Planner • Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner • Luke Watson, Redevelopment Management Analyst • Greg Butler, Director of Public Works • Dan York, City Engineer • Jerry Gonzales, Associate Engineer Technical Consultants to the City • Blanca Price - Landscape Consultant • Environmental Science Associates • Fehr and Peers - Parking Management, Traffic Calming and Street Cross Sections • Frank Miller - Architectural Consultant • Keyser Marston Associates - Economic and Market Analysis Many individuals assisted in the comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. In particular the contribution and involvement of the following individuals for assisting with the preparation of this Specific Plan is acknowledged: Aldo Licitra, Associate Engineer Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Cathy McCarthy, Development Svc. Administrator Christine Damko, Econ. Development Analyst I Eric Jones, Assistant Planner Frank Carranza, Central Services Supervisor Georgann Rauch, Office Specialist-Records Mgmt. Gwynn Flores, Records Manager Herman Parker, Director of Community Services John Degange, GIS Administrator John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer Kelli Beal, GIS Analyst Kevin Harrington, Maintenance Supt.-TCSD Norma Childs, Central Services Coordinator Sean Dakin, Cal Fire Battalion Chief Steve Charette, Associate Engineer
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan i
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
A. Specific Plan Organization ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... I-2
B. Background and History ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... I-4
C. Development of the Vision ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... I-7
1. Old Town Visioning Process ………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. I-7
2. Visioning Process Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………................. I-7
a. Historic Core …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................. I-8
b. Streets ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... I-8
c. Building Heights ……………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... I-8
d. Architecture ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. I-8
e. Murrieta Creek Walk…………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….I-9
f. Infrastructure ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… I-9
g. Residential Neighborhoods …………………………………………………………………………………………............................... I-9
h. Parking …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. I-9
i. Economic Development …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. I-10
j. North area of Old Town …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. I-10
D. Old Town Vision …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. I-11
II. GOALS, POLICIES AND OBJECTIVES
A. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................. II-3
B. Old Town Vision Statement …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................. II-4
C. Development of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… II-4
1. Community Design ……………………………………………………………………………………………………......................................... II-5
2. Sustainable Development ………………………………………………………………………………………..….............................................. II-8
3. Animating the Public Realm ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-11
4. Public Art …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……..................................... II-14
5. Land Use/Economics …………………………………………………………………………………………….................................................. II-17
6. Housing Renaissance ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………………. II-22
7. Mobility and Transportation ………………………………………………………………………………………..………………….................. II-25
8. Parking Management ……………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………................. II-29
9. Murrieta Creek ………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................................ II-33
D. Infrastructure Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………… II-37
1. Parks and Recreation Facilities …………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….. II-37
a. Parks and Recreation Facilities Objective …………………………………………………………………………................................ II-37
b. Park and Recreation Facilities Implementation ……………………………………………………………………................................ II-38
2. Water System………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................................... II-39
a. Water Service Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………………...................................... II-40
b. Water Service Implementation …………………………………………………………………………….…..……………………….. II-40
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan ii
3. Wastewater/Sewer System………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-42
a. Wastewater/Sewer Service Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………….................. II-42
b. Wastewater/Sewer Service Implementation …………………………………………………………………………............................. II-43
4. Drainage and Water Quality………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………… II-45
a. Drainage and Water Quality Objective ………………………………………………………………………………………................. II-45
b. Drainage and Water Quality Implementation ………………………………………………………………………............................... II-45
5. Electricity……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….………….. II-47
a. Electricity Service Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………………............................... II-47
b. Electricity Service Implementation ………………………………………………………………………………………….................. II-47
6. Natural Gas…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. II-47
a. Natural Gas Service Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………….. II-48
b. Natural Gas Service Implementation ……………………………………………………………………………………..…………….. II-48
7. Communication Network………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................. II-48
a. Telephone Service ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-48
b. Internet Service …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………… II-48
8. Solid Waste Disposal……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-48
a. Solid Waste Disposal Service Objective ……………………………………………………………………………………................... II-49
b. Solid Waste Disposal Service Implementation …………………………………………………………………………………………. II-49
9. Circulation Network………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-50
a. Circulation Network Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… II-50
b. Circulation Network Implementation …………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-50
c. Current Roadway Network ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-50
d. Future Roadway Network ……………………………………………………………………………………..…................................... II-52
i. Roadway Improvements …………………………………………………………………………………….............................. II-52
ii. Traffic Control Features ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-52
iii. Pedestrian Oriented Circulation Improvements ……………………………………………………….................................... II-52
iv. Level of Service………..………………………………………………………………………………………........................ II-53
v. Timing and Implementation..…………………………………………………………..……………………............................ II-53
vi. Funding ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………… II-53
vii. Cost Estimates ………………………………………………………………...……..…………….….................................... II-53
e. Future Sidewalk Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-53
i. Timing and Implementation……………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-53
ii. Funding……………………………………………………………………………..………………………………………….. II-53
iii. Cost Estimates………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… II-53
10. Public Parking Facilities……………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………… II-55
a. Cost Estimates…………………………………………………………………....…................................................................................ II-55
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan iii
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
A. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………….…..…………. III-2
B. Authority for the Plan ……………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….……...………. III-2
C. Relationship to the General Plan …………………………………………………………………………...………………………………..………..…… III-2
D. Relationship to Other Codes …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..….................. III-2
E. Relationship to the California Environmental Quality Act ………………………………………………………………………...………..…………...... III-3
1. Cultural and Historic Resources …………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………… III-3
F. Relationship to Other Regulations ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........ III-5
G. Non-Conforming Uses and Structures ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………...... III-5
H. Temecula Historic Preservation District ………………………………………………………………………………………….….................................. III-6
1. Purpose and Intent ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…......................... III-6
2. Historical Background ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…........................ III-6
3. Establishment of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District …………………………………………………………..…....................... III-6
4. Temecula Local Historic Register ………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………. III-6
I. Old Town Local Review Board ………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….III-11
1. Powers and Duties of the Old Town Local Review Board ………………………………………………………………………......................... III-11
2. Project Types and Old Town Local Review Board Review Requirements ………………………………………………….…………………... III-12
a. Level One Projects ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………... III-12
b. Level Two Projects ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….. III-12
3. Finding of Historic Appropriateness …………………………………………………………………………………………….……………...... III-13
a. Findings to Approve or Deny a Finding of Historic Appropriateness Application …………………………………………………….. III-14
J. Building Permits and Prohibitions ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….... III-15
K. Maintenance and Care …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..…………... III-15
L. Additional Provisions for Historic Structures …………………………………………….………………………………………..................................… III-15
M. Approval Authority …………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………….………….... III-15
N. Temporary Use Permits…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................. III-17
1. Purpose and Intent……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…. III-17
2. Permitted Uses……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. III-17
a. Major Temporary Use Permit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-17
b. Minor Temporary Use Permit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-17
3. Authority………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. III-18
4. Findings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... III-18
5. Conditions of Approval………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…. III-18
6. Revocation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-18
O. General Provisions and Regulations ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… III-19
1. Effect of the Specific Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……......................... III-19
2. Minimum Requirements of the Specific Plan ……………………………………………………………………………….……………...……. III-19
3. Severability ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. III-19
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan iv
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A.Introduction.…………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-8
1. What is a Form-Based Code?………………….………………………………………………………………………………….......................... IV-8
2. How to Use This Code…………………………………………………………...……………………………………………............................. IV-8
B. Establishment of the Zoning Districts………………….…………………………………..………………………………………………………............. IV-9
1. Zoning District Boundaries…………………….………………………………………………………………………………….……………… IV-9
2. Old Town Zoning Districts…………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-10
a. Downtown Core District (DTC)………………………………………………………………………………………............................ IV-10
b. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District (DTC/HO)…….……………………………………………………………………………….IV-10
c. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use (R/LMU)….…………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-10
d. Neighborhood Residential (NR)..……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-10
e. Civic District (CV)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-10
f. Open Space District (OS)…...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-10
C. Land Use Regulations….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-10
D. Urban Standards..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
1. Purpose and Intent.….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-13
2. Applicability …………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
3. Regulating Plan Criteria ………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………...……….. IV-13
a. Lot Design Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… IV-13
b. Building Placement ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
c. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-13
d. Parking Required…………...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-13
e. Allowable Building Types …………………………………………………………………………………………................................ IV-13
f. Allowable Building Frontages …………………………………………………………………………………………........................... IV-13
g. Allowable Building Height …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-13
h. Allowable Encroachments…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-13
i. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements …………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-13
j. Private Open Space Requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-13
4. Development Requirements by Zone …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-14
a. Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District (DTC and DTC/HO) ……………………………………………..…... IV-14
i. Lot Design Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… IV-14
ii. Building Placement Criteria ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………. IV-15
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-17
iv. Parking Required ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………. IV-19
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver.............................................................................................................................................. IV-19
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height ……………………………………………………………………………... IV-20
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………….…………….. IV-23
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line ………………………………………………………………………...... IV-27
ix. Allowable Encroachments …………………………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan v
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements …………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-29
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements …………………………………………………………………………...…... IV-30
b. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District (R/LMU) ………………………...………………………………………………………… IV-31
i. Lot Design Criteria ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…... IV-31
ii. Building Placement Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………...…… IV-32
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-33
iv. Parking Required ..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-34
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver …………………………………………………………………………….......................... IV-34
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height …………………………………………………………….......................... IV-35
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-38
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line …………………………………………………………......................... IV-43
ix. Allowable Encroachments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-44
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements ……………………………………………………………….…………………… IV-45
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements ……………………………………………………………….......................... IV-46
c. Neighborhood Residential District (NR) ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-47
i. Lot Design Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………......................... IV-47
ii. Building Placement Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-48
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-50
iv. Parking Required ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-52
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver ……………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-52
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height …………………………………………………………….......................... IV-53
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-55
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line ………………………………………………………..………………… IV-60
ix. Allowable Encroachments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-61
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements ……………………………………………………………………………………. IV-62
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements ……………………………………………………………………………....... IV-63
d. Civic District (CV) ………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. IV-64
i. Exemption from Standards ……………………………………………………………………………………......................... IV-64
e. Open Space (OS) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. IV-65
E. Building Type Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-67
1. Commercial Block ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……....................................... IV-68
a. Commercial Block- Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards……………………………………………………………………….. IV-69
b. Commercial Block- Parking Facilities Standards……………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-69
c. Commercial Block-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-70
d. Commercial Block- Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-70
e. Commercial Block-Landscape Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-71
f. Commercial Block-Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-71
g. Commercial Block- Building Size and Massing Standards……………………………………………………………………………... IV-71
2. Courtyard Building ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….... IV-72
a. Courtyard Building- Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards………………………………………………………………………. IV-73
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan vi
b. Courtyard Building- Parking Facilities Standards……………………………………………………………………………………… IV-73
c. Courtyard Building-Utilitarian Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
d. Courtyard Building- Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
e. Courtyard Building-Landscaping Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
f. Courtyard Building -Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-75
g. Courtyard Building- Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………………….. IV-75
3. Bungalow Courtyard ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-76
a. Bungalow Courtyard-Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards……………………………………………………………………. IV-77
b. Bungalow Courtyard-Parking Facilities Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-77
c. Bungalow Courtyard-Utilitarian Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-78
d. Bungalow Courtyard-Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
e. Bungalow Courtyard-Landscaping Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
f. Bungalow Courtyard-Floor Plan Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
g. Bungalow Courtyard-Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………………….IV-79
4. Rowhouse ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-80
a. Rowhouse-Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
b. Rowhouse-Parking Facilities Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
c. Rowhouse-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
d. Rowhouse-Private Open Space Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-82
e. Rowhouse-Landscaping Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-82
f. Rowhouse-Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-82
g. Rowhouse-Building Size and Massing Standards………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-82
5. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex ……..……………………………………………………………………………………....................................... IV-83
a. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards…………………………………………………………….. IV-84
b. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Parking Facilities Standards…………………………………………………………………………….. IV-84
c. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Utilitarian Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-84
d. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex-Private Open Space Standards………………………………………………………………………….. IV-85
e. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Landscaping Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-85
f. -Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex- Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-85
g. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………. IV-85
6. Detached House …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...................................... IV-86
a. Detached House -Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards…………………………………………………………………………. IV-87
b. Detached House-Parking Facilities Standards………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-87
c. Detached House-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-87
d. Detached House-Private Open Space Standards……………………………………………………………………………………… IV-87
e. Detached House-Landscaping Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-88
f. Detached House- Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-88
g. Detached House-Building Size and Massing Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-88
F. Building Frontage Standards ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-89
1. Frontage Types……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................................... IV-90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan vii
a. Shopfront Frontage …………………………………………………………………………………………........................................... IV-90
b. Arcade Frontage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-91
c. Gallery Frontage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-92
d. Two-story Gallery Frontage…………………………………………………………………………………….................................... IV-93
e. Forecourt Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-94
f. Residential Stoop Frontage……………………………………………………………………………………………........................... IV-95
g. Residential Porch Frontage……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-96
h. Raised Commercial Porch………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-97
2. General Requirements for Commercial Ground Floor Façades ………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-98
G. Supplemental and Special Use Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-99
1. Sidewalk Cafes/Outdoor Dining Areas …………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-99
b. Sidewalk Café/Outdoor Dining Areas Permitted………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
c. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-99
d. Conduct of Hours and Operation………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
e. Suspension or Revocation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-99
2. Vending Carts …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…................................. IV-100
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-100
b. Vendor Permit Required………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-100
c. Vending Cart Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-100
d. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation……………………………………………………………………………………………IV-100
e. Denial, Suspension or Revocation of a Vending Permit………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
3. Mixed-Use Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-101
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
b. Limitation and Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-101
i. Noise/Aesthetics……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
ii. Odor…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
iii. Lighting/Glare………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-102
4. Balconies, Patios and Porches ………………………………………………………………………………………………................................. IV-102
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-102
5. Bed and Breakfast Establishments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... IV-102
a. Intent……………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………… IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…….. IV-102
c. Supplemental Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...IV-102
6. Full Service Hotels ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-102
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-103
7. Loading Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
8. Parking …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan viii
9. Railroad Turntable Preservation Incentives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
10. Civic District Land Use and Development Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-105
H. Circulation and Streetscape Standards ……………………………………………………………………………………………..................................... VI-107
1. Old Town Sidewalk Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-107
a. Current Sidewalk Conditions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-107
b. Sidewalk Design Standards………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………...IV-107
c. Required Sidewalk Configuration Between the Property Line and Build-to Line……………………………………………………… IV-108
d. Sidewalk Cross Sections………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-109
e. Removal of Wooden Boardwalk……………………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-110
f. Establishment of the Sidewalk Zones …………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-111
i. Curb Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-111
ii. Street Furnishing Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-112
iii. Pedestrian Zone……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-113
iv. Frontage Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….IV-113
g. Typical Sidewalk Zone Widths………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-114
2. Old Town Street Standards ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-115
a. Typical Street Cross Sections…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-115
b. Moreno Road (north and south loop) Cross Sections…………………………………………………………………………………… IV-115
c. Termination of Third Street and Fifth Street Adjacent to Murrieta Creek……………………………………………………………… IV-127
3. Traffic Calming Measures………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-130
a. Curb-Bulb-outs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-131
b. Speed Tables and Raised Crosswalk……………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-132
c. Designated/Marked Crosswalks…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-132
d. Roundabouts…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-133
4. Old Town Street Tree Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-134
a. Existing Conditions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-134
b. Required Street Tree Design Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-135
c. Street Tree Placement…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-136
d. Example- Conceptual Street Tree Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-137
e. Tree Grate Specifications………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-137
f. Street Tree Landscape Palette…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….IV-138
5. Old Town Mobility Concept ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-141
a. Street Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-141
i. Roundabout Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-141
b. Pedestrian Connections/Pedestrian Bridges……………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-141
c. Transit Stops…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-142
d. Multi-Use Trails…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-142
I. Alley Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-145
1. Public Alley Cross Section and Construction Requirements ……………………………………………………………….................................. IV-146
a. Utilities…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-148
2. Private Residential and Commercial Alleyways ……………………………………………………………………………................................. IV-149
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan ix
3. Preservation of Existing Alleys in Old Town ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-149
J. Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................. IV-151
1. Objective………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-151
2. Architectural Compatibility……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-151
3. Colors……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-151
4. Materials and Construction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-152
5. Lighting Considerations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-152
6. Applicability………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-153
7. Permit Required…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
8. Sign Program……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
9. Prohibitions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-153
10. Prohibited Signs in Old Town…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
11. Temporary Banners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
12. Temporary Portable Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-154
13. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-154
14. Sign Lighting……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-155
15. Allowable Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
a. Single Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
b. Double Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-156
c. Interior Frontage/Courtyard…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
d. Rear/Secondary Entry…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-156
16. Allowable Sign Types…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-159
a. Wall Mounted/Painted Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-159
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-159
ii. Illumination…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… IV-159
iii. Sign Placement……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-159
iv. Ornamental Elements/Design…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-159
b. Plaque Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-160
c. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-161
d. Blade Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-162
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-162
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-162
iii. Sign Placement/Design……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-162
e. Awning Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-163
i. Illumination…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-163
ii. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-163
iii. Sign Placement/Design……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-163
f. Hanging Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-164
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan x
iii. Sign Placement…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…… IV-164
g. Under Canopy Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-164
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-164
iii. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-164
h. Window Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
i. Illumination ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-165
ii. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
iii. Maximum Sign Area………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-165
i. Accessory Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
i. Directory Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-165
ii. Menu Board……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-166
iii. Directional Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-166
iv. Building Name Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-166
v. Hours of Operations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-167
17. Sign Maintenance……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...… IV-167
K. Public Signage Concept …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….. IV-169
1. Old Town Gateway Signs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-169
2. Directory Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-169
a. Directory Sign Content………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-170
3. Directional Way Finding Signage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-170
a. Directional Way Finding Sign Content………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-171
4. Special Event/Light Pole Banners ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-172
5. Street Name Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-173
6. Old Town/Downtown Logo Signage …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-173
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
A.Introduction……………………………………………………………..……….…………………………………………………..……………………… V-4
1. Relationship to the Urban Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-4
2. Purpose of the Design Guidelines……………………………………………………………………………………............................................ V-5
B. Old Town Architectural Heritage……………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………. V-6
1. Historical Building Forms………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-6
2. Historical Frontage Types………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-7
3. Historical Architectural Styles………………………………………………………………………………...…….............................................. V-8
a. Temecula Mercantile Building……………………………………………………...………………………............................................ V-8
b. Welty Building…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-9
c. Peter Mouren General Merchandise……………………………………………………………………………………….......................V-10
d. Welty Hotel……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-11
e. First National Bank………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................... V-12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xi
f. Santa Fe Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………V-13
g. Palomar Hotel…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-14
h. Champion Building………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................... V-15
i. Craftsman Style………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-15
j. Victorian Style…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-15
k. Summary of Buildings, Circa 1930…………………………………………………………………………………………................... V-16
4. Historical Materials……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-17
5. Western Materials……………………………………………………………………………………………….................................................... V-18
C. Architectural Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-19
1. Building Form………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………. V-19
2. Building Frontages……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................... V-20
a.Shopfront…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-21
b. Gallery……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………V-22
c. Arcade…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-23
d. Two-Story Gallery………………………………….……………………………………..………………………………..…………… V-24
e. Forecourt……….……………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………….. V-25
f. Stoop……………………………………………………….…………………………………………….................................................. V-26
g. Porch ……………………………………………………………………………………………………................................................. V-27
h. Exterior Stairs…………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………................... V-28
i. Combining Frontage Types……………………………….…………………………………………………………………................... V-29
3. Architectural Style Guidelines………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………….... V-30
a. American Mercantile…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-31
b. Spanish Influence: Mission Revival, Spanish Renaissance, Andalusian………………………………………………………………... V-32
i. Mission Revival………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-32
ii. Spanish Renaissance…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-33
iii. Andalusian……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-33
iv. Spanish Influenced Façade Characteristics…………………………………………………………………………………… V-35
c. Monterey…………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………................... V-40
d. Early Modernism……………………………………………………………………………………………………………................... V-43
e. Neo-Classical Revival………………………………………………………………………………….................................................... V-45
f. Craftsman Bungalow…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-47
g. Queen Anne………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………. V-48
h. Western Frontier………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-49
D. Parking Lot Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-55
1. Parking Lot Orientation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-55
2. Joint Parking Facilities Encouraged ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-56
3. Parking Lot Design ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-56
4. Site Access/Driveways …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-57
5. Parking Facility Design for Residential Projects ………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-58
6. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Considerations/Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………. V-59
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xii
E. Urban Landscape Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………........................................................ V-61
1. General Landscape Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-61
2. General Landscape Materials Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
3. Old Town Plant Palette …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
4. Tree Preservation in Old Town …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
5. Water Quality Management Plan Considerations/Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………........................ V-65
6. Green Roof Technology Design Considerations …………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-66
F. Public Art Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................... V-67
1. Location of Public Art ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-68
2. Symbolic and Thematic Content …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-71
3. Mosaics and Murals ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-72
4. Sculptures and Monuments……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-73
5. Lighting Displays ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... V-73
6. Streetscape and Paving Treatments ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-73
7. Benches and Street Furniture ………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. V-74
8. Gateways …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-74
9. Way-Finder ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................. V-74
10. Landscape Treatments and Raised Seating Walls ………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-75
11. Other Types of Public Art ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-75
G. Outdoor Dining/Sidewalk Furniture Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-77
1. Furniture Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............... V-77
2. Umbrella Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-78
3. Fencing Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-79
4. Landscape Treatment Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-80
5. Fencing not Associated with Dining……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….V-81
H. Paving Material Guidelines……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...… V-82
1. Recommended Paving Treatment Types ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-81
2. Recommended Placement of Paving Materials ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-82
3. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Considerations/Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………… V-83
I. Streetscape Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………... V-85
1. Sidewalk Concept ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-85
2. Street Trees ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-86
3. Street Furnishings ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-86
a. Benches …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-86
b. Street Lighting ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-87
c. Trash Receptacles ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-88
d. Newspaper Racks ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-88
e. Mailboxes ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-89
f. Bus Shelters ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-89
g. Parking Meters …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-90
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xiii
4. Other Street Furnishings ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......... V-90
J. Alley Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… V-91
1. Public Alleyways …………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………….. V-91
2. Private Alleyways ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-92
K. Utility and Infrastructure Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-93
1. Water Service Design Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-93
2. Electrical Service Design Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….......... V-95
3. Natural Gas Service Design Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-96
VI. APPENDICES
A. Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-2
B. Old Town Plant List……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-11
C. Design Guidelines Case Studies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-45
1. Forecourt Frontage Type………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-46
2. Restoring Street Frontages: Adding to Existing Buildings……………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-47
3. In-fill Building Example………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-48
4. Murrieta Creek Walk……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-49
5. Paseos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-50
6. Examples of Attached Residential and Mixed-Use Buildings……………………………………………………………………………………. VI-52
7. Existing Example of Successful Mid-Block Parking Behind the Building………………………………………………………………………. VI-55
8. Moreno Road Neighborhood Market……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... VI-56
D. Old Town Parking Management Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-58
E. Examples of Compact Double Detector Check……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. VI-59
F. Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-63
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xiv
(This page is left blank intentionally).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xv
LIST OF EXHIBITS:
Exhibit I-1: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Area Map……………………………………………………………………………………………...……. I-6
Exhibit II-1: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Rancho California Water District Pipeline System..……………………………………………………… II-41
Exhibit II-2: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Eastern Municipal Water District Pipeline System……………………………………………………...… II-44
Exhibit II-3: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Storm Drain Lines……………………………………………………………………………………….… II-46
Exhibit II-4: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Existing Roadway Network………………………………………………………………………………. II-51
Exhibit II-5: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Future Roadway Network…………………………………………………………………………………. II-54
Exhibit III-1: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Historic Structures Map………………………………………………………………………………….. III-9
Exhibit III-2: Historic Structures Outside of Old Town………………………………………………………………………………………………………. III-10
Exhibit IV-1: Old Town Regulating Plan…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-9
Exhibit IV-2: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Historic Turntable Map…………...……………………………………………………………………… IV-104
Exhibit IV-3: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Street Tree Map………………………………...………………………………………………………… IV-140
Exhibit IV-4: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Old Town Mobility……………………………………………………………………………………… IV-143
Exhibit IV-5: Old Town Temecula Specific Plan-Alleys……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-150
LIST OF TABLES:
Table III-1: Historic Buildings and Structures in Old Town………………………………………………………………………………………………….. III-7
Table III-2: Historic Buildings and Structures Outside of Old Town……………………………………………………………………………………….... III-7
Table III-3: Historic Buildings and Structures Demolished Since the Adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan……………………………………………. III-8
Table III-4: Approval Authority………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. III-16
Table IV-1: Land Use Matrix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-11
Table IV-2: Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District Lot Design Criteria……………………………………………………………... IV-14
Table IV-3: Building Placement in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots without Murrieta Creek Frontage………… IV-15
Table IV-4: Building Placement in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots with Murrieta Creek…………………...….. IV-16
Table IV-5: Parking Placement in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots without Murrieta Creek……………………. IV-17
Table IV-6: Parking Placement in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots with Murrieta Creek Frontage……………... IV-18
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xvi
Table IV-7: Parking Requirements in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overland District………………………………………………….. IV-19
Table IV-8: Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District…………………..…….. IV-20
Table IV-9: Allowable Frontage Types in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District………………………………………………. IV-23
Table IV-10: Required Percentage of Frontage on the Build-to Line in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District………………... IV-27
Table IV-11: Allowable Encroachments in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District……………………………………………... IV-28
Table IV-12: Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District…………………………………………... IV-28
Table IV-13: Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District Lot Design Criteria………………………………………………………………………….……….. IV-31
Table IV-14: Building Placement in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District…………………………………………………………………………… IV-32
Table IV-15: Allowable Parking Placement in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District………………………………………………………………… IV-33
Table IV-16: Parking Requirements in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District………………………………………………………………………… IV-34
Table IV-17: Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District………………………………….………….. IV-35
Table IV-18: Allowable Frontage Types in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District………………………………………………………………….… IV-38
Table IV-19: Required Percentage of Building Frontage on the Build-to Line in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District……….……………………. IV-43
Table IV-20: Allowable Encroachments in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District……………………………………………………………...…….. IV-44
Table IV-21: Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District………………………………………………………………..... IV-44
Table IV-22: Neighborhood Residential District Lot Design Criteria………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-47
Table IV-23: Building Placement in the Neighborhood Residential District for Lots without Murrieta Creek Frontage……………………………………. IV-48
Table IV-24: Building Placement in the Neighborhood Residential District for Lots with Murrieta Creek Frontage……………………………………….. IV-49
Table IV-25: Parking Placement in the Neighborhood Residential District for Lots without Murrieta Creek Frontage…………………………………….. IV-50
Table IV-26: Parking Placement in the Neighborhood Residential District for Lots with Murrieta Creek Frontage……………………………..………….. IV-51
Table IV-27: Parking Requirements in the Neighborhood Residential District………………………………………………………………………………. IV-52
Table IV-28: Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Neighborhood Residential District…………………………………………………… IV-53
Table IV-29: Allowable Frontage Types in the Neighborhood Residential District………………………………………………………………………….. IV-55
Table IV-30: Required Percentage of Building Frontage on the Build-to Line in the Neighborhood Residential District……………………………….…. IV-60
Table IV-31: Allowable Encroachments in the Neighborhood Residential District………………………………………………………………………….. IV-61
Table IV-32: Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Neighborhood Residential District……………………………………………………………………….. IV-61
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xvii
Table IV-33: Typical Sidewalk Zone Widths………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-114
Table IV-34: Sign Area Calculations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-157
Table IV-35: Allowable Sign Area Matrix…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….. IV-158
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan xviii
(This page is left blank intentionally).
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-1
CONTENTS:
A. Specific Plan Organization ……………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………......................... I-2
B. Background and History ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…......................... I-4
C. Development of the Vision ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…......................... I-7
1. Old Town Visioning Process …………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… I-7
2. Visioning Process Recommendations …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... I-7
a. Historic Core ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…... I-8
b. Streets …………………………………………………………………………………………………………....................................... I-8
c. Building Heights ………………………………………………………………………………………………....................................... I-8
d. Architecture …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… I-8
e. Murrieta Creek ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. I-9
f. Infrastructure …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... I-9
g. Residential Neighborhoods ……………………………………………………………………………………....................................... I-9
h. Parking ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…… I-9
i. Economic Development …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…...... I-10
j. North Area of Old Town……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. I-10
D. Old Town Vision ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. I-11
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-2
A. SPECIFIC PLAN ORGANIZATION
The Old Town Specific Plan is organized into six core
chapters:
I. Introduction
The Introduction chapter provides a brief discussion of
the following:
• Old Town’s background and history
• The development of the Old Town vision and
the visioning process for the comprehensive
update to the Specific Plan
• The incorporation of form-based code
principles into the Old Town Specific Plan
document
• Ten specific overarching goals and
recommendations that emerged from the
visioning process
• The groundwork for Old Town’s future
evolution and development
II. Goals, Objectives and Policies
The Goals, Objectives and Policies chapter articulate
the community’s vision for Old Town based upon the
updated vision statement that was developed to reflect
the ten goals and recommendations that emerged from
the visioning process. Detailed goals, objectives and
policies are provided for the following focus areas:
• Community Design
• Sustainable Development
• Animating the Public Realm
• Public Art
• Land Use/Economics
• Housing Renaissance
• Mobility and Transportation
• Parking Management
• Murrieta Creek
• Infrastructure
III. Administration and Historic Preservation
The Administration and Historic Preservation chapter is
provided to outline the procedures for processing land
use permits, development permits and other
discretionary permits within the Old Town Specific
Plan area. This chapter also includes a discussion of the
historical buildings in Old Town and the importance of
their preservation in the future. A discussion of the
following is included in this chapter:
• Authority for the Old Town Specific Plan
• The Specific Plan’s relationship to the General
Plan, Development Code, Municipal Code and
other codes, laws, ordinances, regulations
• The establishment and purpose of the
Temecula Local Historic Preservation District
• Historic buildings listed on the Temecula
Local Historic Register
• The Old Town Local Review Board and its
authority, duties, power and meeting
procedures
• The purpose and intent of a Finding of
Historical Appropriateness application and the
findings to deny or approve such an
application
• The approval authority and processing
procedures for all projects proposed in Old
Town
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-3
IV. Urban Development Standards-Form-Based
Code
The Urban Development Standards chapter is a form-
based code which is visual in nature and intended to
clearly illustrate the development regulations and
standards in the Old Town area. The form-based code
emphasizes building form and a building’s relationship
to the public realm over land use. A discussion of the
following is included in this chapter:
• Establishment of the zoning districts and
regulating plan
• Land use matrix
• The form-based code which includes
development standards for building placement,
parking placement and parking ratio
requirements, building height, frontage type
requirements, building type requirements and
landscaping requirements for each zone
• Supplemental and Special Use Standards
• Circulation, streetscape, and sidewalk
standards
• Sidewalk zones, traffic calming measures,
street tree requirements and alley standards
• Sign guidelines, sign standards and the public
signage concept
V. Design Guidelines
The Design Guidelines chapter provides a discussion of
the historical architectural styles that were present in
Old Town in the 1880s through 1940s, and how the
historical character should be present in all
development projects in Old Town. This chapter also
discusses other recommended design criteria that should
be applied to all projects in Old Town. A discussion of
the following is included in this chapter:
• Historical building forms, historical building
types, historical architectural styles and
historical building materials
• Architectural Design Guidelines, including
recommendations for building form, building
frontages and architectural styles
• Parking lot, landscape, and public art design
guidelines
• Outdoor dining/sidewalk café design
guidelines
• Paving materials design guidelines
• Street, alleys and infrastructure/utility design
guidelines
VI. Appendices
The appendices provide a number of reference
documents. The following documents are included in
this chapter:
• Glossary of Terms
• Plant List
• Design Guidelines – Conceptual Case Studies
• Old Town Parking Management Plan
• Compact Double Detector Check
Specifications
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-4
B. BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
The site of Old Town Temecula, as we know it today,
came into being generally in the 1880s with the arrival
of the railroad and the moving of the post office to the
town's present location. The area did have a much
earlier beginning, however, dating back to the original
village settled by the Shoshonean Indians around 900
A.D. along the banks of the Temecula River.
The arrival of the first white visitors, Father Juan
Narberto de Santiago and seven soldiers who traveled to
the area from the Mission San Juan Capistrano, did not
occur until the early 1800s. In order to establish the
Mission's agricultural area, a granary and chapel were
established in 1818 which marked the first settlement in
the area by the white man. Not long after, in 1830,
John McGee built a general store near the Pauba Ranch
Headquarters, further increasing the presence of the
white man in the area.
The Indians lived a quiet existence until 1847 when
they clashed with the Californios, Mexican and Spanish
settlers who lived in California before it was annexed
by the United States, in one of the bloodiest battles of
the Mexican War. The "Temecula Massacre," as it is
referred to by local historians, changed the Indian's
relationship with the area and generally paved the way
for increased settlement.
During the next 25 years, white settlers began to move
into the area in increasing numbers, pushing the Indians
off the more desirable land and further into the foothills.
In 1885, John Butterfield founded a mail and passenger
stage coach route which had a regular stop in Temecula,
prompting Temecula’s first development boom. A post
office was built in 1859 on a site near John McGee's
general store, but due to the Civil War the stage line
was halted in 1861.
With the continuing arrival of settlers also came an
increasing concern about the Indians and a desire for
their precious river oriented land. In 1876 a San Diego
County Sheriff's posse came without warning and
physically moved the Indians to a site not far from the
present location of the Pechanga Indian Reservation.
The coming of the railroad to Temecula in 1882 marked
another boom period in the City's history. Granite
quarries became productive in the late 1880s and lasted
until 1915. Thousands of tons of cut granite were
shipped from Temecula to form the front steps of the
Riverside County courthouse, curbstones on Market
Street in San Francisco, cemetery monuments, and
hitching posts. Some of these curbs are still present in
Temecula in front of the old Machado Store/Long
Branch Saloon building, around the corner from the
Bank, as well as in front of the Temecula Hotel. The
largest piece, totaling 15 tons, is in Sam Hicks
Monument Park, on which are inscribed the names of
the notable visitors to the Temecula Valley.
These times brought prosperity to Temecula and the
town grew steadily. Notable buildings that were
constructed during this time include: the Temecula
Mercantile (Burnham Store) in 1891; First National
Bank in 1914; and the Palomar Hotel in 1927, to
mention a few. St. Catherine’s Catholic Church was
built in 1917 and was the first building in Temecula
actually built as a church. It continued to function as a
church until 1980, when a new church was built to
accommodate the growing congregation. The old
church has since become the Chapel of Memories and
has been relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park.
Some of the most important historic buildings in Old
Town come from this time period. The Welty Building,
built in 1891, served as a general store with rooms to
rent. In 1908, this building was transformed into the
Ramona Inn, housing the Blind Pig Saloon on the
ground floor and a boxing ring upstairs where the likes
of Jack Dempsey and Jack Sharkey would train. Other
key buildings from the late 1800s include the Hotel
Temecula, Machado Store, the Old Town Jail, and the
Temecula Mercantile building.
The Mercantile and Peter Mouren Buildings, Circa 1890
Temecula Train Depot, Circa 1882
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
The Bank, Circa 1914
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-5
The Welty Store
The Welty Building, pictured above, was built by R.J.
Welty in the 1890s and was used as a general store.
There were rooms upstairs for rent and Joe Winkels
operated his famous “Ramona Inn” here; and from
1908 until 1933 while most of Riverside County was
dry, Winkels offered “refreshments,” pool tables,
card games and even slot machines. It has been
known as “The Stallion,” “The Stable,” and later as
“The Corner,” which was a popular sandwich shop.
Today, Old Town is but a part, albeit an important part,
of this larger community. New development surrounds
the historic town site and while many of its historic
structures have been torn down or moved, others still
remain as a reminder of what Temecula was, and more
importantly, as an inspiration for what it can be in the
future.
The approval of the Old Town Temecula Historic
Preservation District by the Riverside Board of
Supervisors in October 1979 marked the first
recognition that Old Town Temecula truly is a unique
place with a historic character worth preserving and
enhancing. Since that initial recognition, other steps
have also been taken to help plan Old Town's future
and preserve its historic buildings and character.
With the preparation of Temecula's General Plan,
which began in early 1992, a focus on the issues facing
Old Town was established. Throughout the various
elements of the General Plan (including Land Use,
Circulation, Open Space, and Community Design),
policies were identified to preserve and revitalize Old
Town. The primary policy recommendation that
emerged from the General Plan was the need to prepare
a specific plan for the Old Town area. Acting on this
recommendation, the Temecula City Council authorized
the preparation of the Old Town Specif ic Plan (OTSP)
to provide a master plan for the future development of
the Old Town area. The boundaries of the Old Town
Specific Plan are depicted in Exhibit I-1.
The Old Town Specific Plan was prepared in 1992 and
1993 with the assistance of Urban Design Studio and
the Council-appointed Old Town Steering Committee.
The Steering Committee members represented a wide -
range of local business and resident interests. The
community is indebted to the following individuals for
their participation in this process: Helga Berger, Susan
Bridges, Carlene Danielsen, Linda Fahey, Christina
Grina, Bill Harker, Larry Markham, Peg Moore, La
Verne Parker, Bonnie Reed, and Steve Sanders.
The Old Town Specific Plan was adopted by the City
Council on February 22, 1994. Since its adoption, the
Specific Plan has been revised six times. The first
revision occurred in the year 1996, the second revision
occurred in 1997, and another revision was completed
in 1999. In 2000, when after more than six years of
using the plan it became apparent that it was in need of
revision with regard to sign regulations. Further
revisions were made to the plan in 2004 to adopt zoning
standards and historic preservation requirements, and
again in 2006 to amend portions of the zoning standards
and sign regulations, establish alley guidelines, and
expand the historic preservation provisions to selected
properties outside of Old Town. The fourth revision,
initiated in mid-2007 and completed in May of 2010,
was comprehensive in scope and resulted in completely
new street standards, development standards and design
guidelines for Old Town that focus on the form of the
buildings and streetscape with the intent being to guide
development in Old Town toward a more pedestrian
friendly traditional downtown design. Revisions were
also made to encourage mixed-use development
(combined commercial/residential uses) within Old
Town’s Downtown Core and within the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
St. Catherine’s Church
Pictured above, was built in 1917 and was the first church building in Temecula. The church was moved
from its original location to its present location in Sam Hicks Monument Park; and now serves as a wedding
chapel, known as the Chapel of Memories, to benefit the Temecula Valley Museum.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-6
Note:
True north is shown on
this map for reference.
However, whenever a
directional reference is
made throughout the
Old Town Specific Plan
document the
directional reference
shall follow the
direction of the streets.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-7
C. DEVELOPMENT OF THE VISION
Temecula’s rich history and cultural heritage has set the
foundation for the development of Old Town as the
heart of the historic district of the Temecula Valley. In
recent years, the Old Town area has experienced
increased growth and development largely occurring
since the year 2003. This increase in activity and
interest has since set the stage for the future
development and vision of the Old Town area.
1. Old Town Visioning Process
Six “Old Town Visioning Workshops” were held with
the community from June to December 2007. These
community workshops were held prior to the update of
the Old Town Specific Plan to acquire invaluable input,
perspective and ideas from business owners, property
owners, and other key stake-holders in the Old Town
area.
These workshops covered the topics of historic and
existing conditions, urban design elements, alternative
design concepts, market feasibility, and parking
management/demand. The six workshops were well
attended by a mix of business owners, property owners,
residents, interested citizens, and other Old Town
stakeholders. The community’s feedback included the
importance of respecting and maintaining the historic
character of Old Town, preserving the current mix of
buildings to ensure that small businesses are not forced
out as new development occurs, and providing a
connection between Old Town and Murrieta Creek.
The public was also interested in the intensity of
building height, building mass, and the adequacy of
parking facilities in Old Town.
Some individuals also expressed concerns that newer
developments do not maintain and respect the historic
character of Old Town. The Planning Commission and
Old Town Local Review Board expressed similar
concerns related to preserving the historical character of
Old Town in the future.
In response to the community’s concerns, the City
Council directed Planning and Redevelopment staff to
examine these issues and return with policy
recommendations for their consideration. In response
to this direction, staff worked in conjunction with
consulting firms Inland Planning + Design and Gibbs
Planning Group (planning, urban design, and retail
marketing), Keyser-Marston (economic feasibility), and
Fehr and Peers (parking and circulation) and developed
a three-pronged approach to analyzing the issues. This
approach recognized that the community’s concerns
transcend building design, height and mass, and include
the economic feasibility of different development
scenarios for the area, as well as the need to identify
and ensure adequate circulation and parking to serve the
Old Town area. As a result of the community
workshops a series of ten goals and recommendations
emerged which were overwhelmingly supported by the
workshop attendees.
2. Visioning Process Recommendations
The recommendations established through the “Old
Town Visioning” process set the foundation for Old
Town’s future evolution, and the City Council
authorized staff to proceed with a comprehensive
revision to the Old Town Specific Plan that focuses on
the following ten items:
• Historic Core
• Streets
• Building Heights
• Architecture
• Murrieta Creek
• Infrastructure
• Residential Neighborhoods
• Parking
• Economic Development
• North Area of Old Town (near Moreno Road)
The Palomar Hotel, pictured above, was constructed around
1915, and is a designated historic structure located in the
heart of the historic district in Old Town. Old Town’s future
development is intended to preserve and uphold the historic
legacy of buildings such as the Palomar Hotel and other
historic buildings in the area.
The Dalton I building pictured above was constructed in
2006 and is located on the corner of Fifth Street and
Mercedes Street in Old Town.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-8
a. Historic Core
The importance of preserving Old Town’s historic core
at the confluence of Old Town Front Street and Main
Street is emphasized to ensure that new development
respects the existing historical context of the area, as
well as the building form, massing and height of
existing historical structures.
b. Streets
The future development of Old Town will protect and
preserve the historic grid pattern of existing streets and
alley-ways. The maintenance of the grid-pattern and
purposeful placement of buildings to create activity on
the streets will enhance the historic character of the
area. The relationship between the streets, alleys and
buildings will promote walkability and pedestrian
activity in the Old Town area.
c. Building Heights
Development parameters on building height and
building placement on the lots in Old Town will be
achieved through “form-based” codes and detailed
performance standards that respect the relationship
between new development and existing adjacent
historic structures.
d. Architecture
New development will respect the historical heritage of
Old Town and promote a lively pedestrian oriented
streetscape by following architectural guidelines related
to building form, architectural style, street frontage
design, materials, color, and detailing resulting in high-
quality, well designed buildings.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-9
e. Murrieta Creek Walk
The visual and functional connection between Murrieta
Creek and Old Town will be achieved by orienting
buildings, courtyards and balconies to face the creek
and constructing trails and bike paths to promote
activity along the creek. In addition, new buildings will
be constructed in accordance with form -based
guidelines for massing and building placement in
relation to the creek.
f. Infrastructure
Improved infrastructure for water, sewer, power,
communications, road and alleyways, trash and
deliveries will be achieved in Old Town as a result of a
comprehensive understanding of existing and future
infrastructure needs. Additionally, the careful design
and encouraged placement of utilities adjacent to the
alleys will ensure a consistent streetscape and
pedestrian oriented design adjacent to building
frontages, sidewalks and alleyways.
g. Residential Neighborhoods
The development of high quality residential
neighborhoods are encouraged to support the mixed -
use, commercial and office core of Old Town. High
quality neighborhoods will develop in accordance with
“form-based” development and design standards which
allow for both residential-only developments as well as
mixed-use projects.
h. Parking
As new development occurs, adequate parking facilities
will be provided in Old Town by developing and
facilitating a number of strategies in accordance with
the Old Town Parking Management Plan to address
special event parking needs, and continuing to develop
a comprehensive parking strategy to ensure an adequate
parking supply in the future.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-10
i. Economic Development
Sustainable economic development in Old Town will
occur by anticipating the future needs of businesses and
residents by preparing an economic development plan
and marketing strategy for the area to attract growth and
desirable new business and development.
j. North area of Old Town
The visual and functional connection between Old
Town’s Downtown Core and the area north of Old
Town will be achieved by exploring opportunities to
extend the historical street and alley grid pattern into
the northern part of Old Town and utilizing form-based
code standards for new development that occurs in this
area.
With the goals and recommendations for the future
development of Old Town identified, staff proceeded
with a comprehensive update to the Old Town Specific
Plan that utilizes principles of form-based codes. The
updated Specific Plan is intended to protect and
preserve the historic core of Old Town near the
intersection of Old Town Front Street and Main Street,
and to identify streetscape designs that will improve
pedestrian accessibility and the walkable character of
Old Town.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-11
D. OLD TOWN VISION
Based upon the visioning process recommendations,
Old Town is envisioned to develop as a vibrant
pedestrian-friendly, walkable downtown destination in
the heart of Temecula’s historic district. The ambiance
of Old Town will be created by a vibrant streetscape
which includes buildings reminiscent of architecture
from the 1880s thru 1940s. The historical context of the
building designs and architectural styles are modernized
with a mix of up-to-date land uses and businesses. The
lively character of the Old Town area will be achieved
through a careful balance of residential uses constructed
amongst specialty retail shops, restaurants and dining
opportunities, small-scale boutiques and up-scale
entertainment oriented uses.
Old Town Temecula is attractive to both visitors and
residents because of its unique small-town character,
distinctive retail shops, exceptional restaurants,
boutique hotels, nearby wine country, and wide range of
special events. The evolution of the Old Town area into
a charming mixed-use district, complete with the
liveliness expected from an active small-scale urban
downtown, attracts visitors, residents and business
owners alike creating a viable economic district. The
distinctive charm of the Old Town area will attract a
wide-range of interest throughout the community , the
region, and beyond.
Old Town is envisioned to develop as a vibrant,
pedestrian-friendly, walkable downtown
destination in the heart of Temecula’s historic
district.
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan I-12
(This page is left blank intentionally).
I. INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIFIC PLAN
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-1
CONTENTS:
A. Introduction ……………………………………………………….………………………………………………………………..……………..……… II-3
B. Old Town Vision Statement ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......... II-4
C. Development of the Goals, Objectives, and Policies …………………………………………………………..…………………………………………. II-4
1. Community Design ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…................... II-5
2. Sustainable Development……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….………... II-8
3. Animating the Public Realm ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… II-11
4. Public Art ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................... II-14
5. Land Use/Economics …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..… II-17
6. Housing Renaissance …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......................... II-22
7. Mobility and Transportation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. II-25
8. Parking Management ………………………………………………………………………………………………….......................................... II-29
9. Murrieta Creek …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................... II-33
D. Infrastructure …..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... II-37
1. Parks and Recreation Facilities …………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..… II-37
a. Parks and Recreation Facilities Objective …………………………………………………………………………………………..….. II-37
b. Park and Recreation Facilities Implementation …………………………………………………………….…….................................. II-38
2. Water System………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…...................................... II-39
a. Water Service Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………….……………………..….. II-40
b. Water Service Implementation…………………………………………………………………………………...................................... II-40
3. Wastewater/Sewer System…………………………………………………………………………………………………................................... II-42
a. Wastewater/Sewer Service Objectives ………………………………………………………………………..………………………… II-42
b. Wastewater/Sewer Service Implementation ………………………………………………………………………................................. II-43
4. Drainage and Water Quality………………………………………………………………………………………………..................................... II-45
a. Drainage and Water Quality Objective ……………………………………………………………………….………………………... II-45
b. Drainage and Water Quality Implementation …………………………………………………………………..………………………. II-45
5. Electricity……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................................. II-47
a. Electricity Service Objectives …………………………………………………………………………………....……………………... II-47
b. Electricity Service Implementation ………………………………………………………………………….……................................. II-47
6. Natural Gas……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………................. II-47
a. Natural Gas Service Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………….…............................... II-48
b. Natural Gas Service Implementation ………………………………………………………………………………............................... II-48
7. Communication Network………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….... II-48
a. Telephone Service ………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………..… II-48
b. Internet Service ……………………………………………………………………………………………………................................. II-48
8. Solid Waste Disposal…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. II-48
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-2
a. Solid Waste Disposal Service Objective ………………………………………………………………………….…………………..... II-49
b. Solid Waste Disposal Service Implementation ……………………………………………………………………................................ II-49
9. Circulation Network……………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................. II-50
a. Circulation Network Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………….….............................. II-50
b. Circulation Network Implementation ……………………………………………………………………..……..….............................. II-50
c. Current Roadway Network ………………………………………………………………………………….…..…………………..….. II-50
d. Future Roadway Network ……………………………………………………………………………………..…................................... II-52
i. Roadway Improvements ……………………………………………………………………………………............................. II-52
ii. Traffic Control Features …………………………………………………………………………………………………….... II-52
iii. Pedestrian Oriented Circulation Improvements ……………………………………………………….................................... II-52
iv. Level of Service………..………………………………………………………………………………………....................... II-53
v. Timing and Implementation..…………………………………………………………..……………………............................ II-53
vi. Funding ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………………………... II-53
vii. Cost Estimates ………………………………………………………………...……..…………….….................................... II-53
e. Future Sidewalk Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. II-53
i. Timing and Implementation…………………………………………………………………………………………………… II-53
ii. Funding……………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………. II-53
iii. Cost Estimates………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… II-53
10. Public Parking Facilities………………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………… II-55
a. Cost Estimates……………………………………………………....…................................................................................................... II-55
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-3
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this section is to articulate the goals,
objectives and policies for the Old Town area based
upon the goals and recommendations that emerged as
part of the Old Town Visioning Process. The goals,
objectives and policies provide the framework for
future development in the area and provide a basis for
implementation of the vision for Old Town.
Goals
Goals are broad statements of purpose that define
the community and local government's hope for
the future. Goals are general in nature and do not
indicate when or how they are to be
accomplished.
Objectives
Objectives are statements of intent that generally
guide future decisions in specific topic areas.
Policies
Policies are more specific statements of intent to
deal with particular topics in a certain fashion.
They begin to define the approach to achieve the
Specific Plan’s goals and objectives. Policies are
the first step in the development of a solution.
Policies form the basis of development standards
and zoning regulations.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-4
B. OLD TOWN VISION STATEMENT
The vision statement for the Old Town Specific Plan
was initially developed by the Old Town Steering
Committee in 1992. Since this time, certain sections of
the Old Town Specific Plan have been amended as
needed. However the overall vision for Old Town was
not updated until work began on a comprehensive
amendment to the plan in 2008.
Prior to the commencement of the comprehensive
update to the Old Town Specific Plan, the Old Town
Visioning Process occurred from mid 2007 to the end
of 2008. During this process, the future vision for the
Old Town area was supported by community members
and stakeholders, as well as by the Planning
Commission, and was ultimately supported by the City
Council. This support allowed for staff to proceed with
a comprehensive update to the Specific Plan. This
comprehensive update to the Old Town Specific Plan
resulted in a revision to the overall vision statement for
the area. The vision statement defines the future
development concept for Old Town and encompasses
the comprehensive changes made to the document. The
updated vision statement is the basis for Old Town’s
prospective evolution and provides policy direction
and guidance for the future development and economic
vitality of the area.
C. DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOALS,
OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
In an effort to further define and prioritize the overall
vision statement for Old Town, detailed goals,
objectives and policies are provided for the following
thematic areas of focus:
• Community Design
• Sustainable Development
• Animating the Public Realm
• Public Art
• Land Use/Economics
• Housing Renaissance
• Mobility and Transportation
• Parking Management
• Murrieta Creek
• Infrastructure
Old Town Vision Statement
To create a dynamic, walkable and pedestrian
friendly mixed-use core in Old Town that consists
of attractive, high quality development, respectful
of its existing historic buildings, while
maintaining a unified design theme and unique
architectural characteristics through form-based
code principles, and by providing an
economically viable and sustainable community
to attract a mixture of local and tourist
commercial, administrative/professional, and
residential uses, while maintaining a safe,
efficient multi-modal circulation network that
supports future development and complements
Murrieta Creek, maintains an adequate
infrastructure system to serve the businesses and
residences, and ensures sufficient parking
facilities.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-5
1. Community Design
Temecula’s rich history and vibrant past as a bustling
boomtown has set the stage for future development in
Old Town. Buildings will reflect the architectural styles
of the 1880s to 1940s, which represents a signif icant
time period in the City’s past history and tradition.
Future development in the Old Town area will reflect
the architectural melting pot of American traditions and
European architecture that was adapted to the
conditions of the area.
Community Design-Objective 1:
Provide easy to follow form-based codes and design
guidelines for new development to complement and
promote the future vision and goals for the Old Town
area.
Community Design-Objective 2:
Maintain aesthetic interest by requiring that all sides of
a building visible from the right-of-way receive 360-
degree stylistic architectural treatments, except where
prohibited by Fire and Building codes, or inappropriate
due to zero-lot lines.
Community Design Goal
To create a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly, walkable
downtown destination in Old Town by developing
high quality commercial buildings and residential
neighborhoods through historically relevant and
architecturally authentic building design consistent
with the architectural styles of the 1880s to 1940s.
Community Design Objectives
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-6
Community Design-Objective 3:
Preserve Old Town’s architectural legacy by
encouraging authentic and historical building forms,
historical building frontage types, historically relevant
architectural styles, and historically appropriate
building materials and color schemes.
Community Design-Objective 4:
Define the space between the building façade, the
property line, and the street.
Community Design-Objective 5:
Reinforce historic building forms and development
patterns in Old Town by positioning buildings at
“build-to” lines in order to clearly define street edges,
enhance architectural character, and enliven the
pedestrian experience.
Community Design-Objective 6:
Revitalize existing building facades which do not
comply with form-based code principles, pedestrian
friendly streetscape design standards, historical
building forms, or architectural styles.
Community Design-Objective 7:
Promote a clearly pedestrian atmosphere within the
Downtown Core, which is the area bounded by First
Street to the south, Sixth Street to the north, Murrieta
Creek to the west, and Mercedes Avenue to the north
and east.
Community Design-Objective 8:
Design vehicular entry points which provide a sense of
arrival to Old Town and initiate the Old Town
streetscape theme.
Community Design-Objective 9:
Protect the historic grid pattern in Old Town,
specifically between First and Sixth Streets to maintain
the historic character and pedestrian oriented nature of
the streets. Explore opportunities to extend the grid
pattern within the Moreno Road triangle.
Community Design-Objective 10:
Provide for a comfortable pedestrian environment by
screening visually objectionable views such as outdoor
storage areas, utility equipment, trash bins,
roof-mounted equipment and loading areas.
Community Design-Objective 11:
Promote California Friendly Landscaping throughout
the Old Town area to conserve water and to enhance
building facades, storefronts and neighborhoods.
Community Design-Objective 12:
Enhance and promote the creation of enjoyable public
spaces throughout Old Town through the placement of
street furniture, landscaping, public art, and pedestrian
oriented building design.
Community Design-Objective 13:
Provide signs consistent with the Public Signage
Concept to guide tourists to important destinations and
other points of interest in Old Town.
Community Design-Objective 14:
Remove existing wooden plank sidewalks and replace
with stamped concrete to simulate wooden boardwalk
and maintain the historical aesthetic along Old Town
Front Street.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-7
Community Design-Policy 1:
Develop mutually dependent streetscape standards,
design guidelines, and urban standards to expedite
design review through greater design detail and to
ensure that future development acknowledges and
appreciates the variety of Old Town’s existing historical
buildings, provides a rich and varied character to the
streetscape and enables a variety of individual
expression in the design of future buildings.
Community Design-Policy 2:
Require compliance with the land use standards and
consistency with the Design Guidelines section of the
Old Town Specific Plan for all development projects
in Old Town.
Community Design-Policy 3:
Establish and require compliance with signage design
guidelines and standards that promote the pedestrian-
scale of the area and complement the varying
architectural styles and building forms in Old Town.
Community Design-Policy 4:
Consider economic incentives for owners who wish to
architecturally rehabilitate or refurbish Old Town
storefronts in accordance with the design and
streetscape guidelines of this Specific Plan.
Community Design-Policy 5:
Establish Front Street and Main Street as the “heart” of
Old Town by creating a pedestrian oriented mixed-use
core in this area through appropriate zoning and land
use standards.
Community Design-Policy 6:
Encourage neighborhood commercial-type uses within
the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use zoning district,
such as a small grocery store or corner market, to
support the residential uses in Old Town.
Community Design-Policy 7:
Encourage a mixture of 50 percent residential
development and 50 percent commercial development
within Old Town.
Community Design-Policy 8:
Encourage graffiti resistant materials whenever
feasible.
Community Design-Policy 9:
Eliminate overhead utility lines throughout Old Town
in accordance with Ordinance 04-02.
Community Design-Policy 10:
Require compliance with the Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance and encourage the use of native
landscape materials that are clean, safe, drought
tolerant and wind resistant.
Community Design Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-8
2. Sustainable Development
Sustainability is related to the overall quality of life in
a community. Sustainability does not have one
definition; however the general concept of
sustainability involves the ability to meet the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to also meet their own needs.
Sustainability focuses on three components: the natural
environment, the social connectedness among people,
and the economic and financial prosperity of a
community. The benefits of sustainability are three-
fold and positively impact the environment, the
economy and society.
Sustainable Development-Objective 1:
Ensure that all policy decisions have positive
implications for the long-term sustainability of the Old
Town area.
Sustainable Development-Objective 2:
Ensure that the protection, preservation and restoration
of the natural environment are mutually dependent on
economic health and social equity.
Sustainable Development-Objective 3:
Recognize the connection between the residents of Old
Town and the local, regional, national and global
communities.
Sustainable Development-Objective 4:
Promote community awareness, responsibility,
participation and education as essential elements for
establishing a sustainable community in Old Town.
Sustainable Development-Objective 5:
Prioritize key issues related to sustainability in Old
Town and balance the costs and benefits associated
with sustainable measures and practices.
Sustainable Development-Objective 6:
Strive to reduce energy use and support the use of
clean, renewable energy sources in Old Town.
Sustainable Development-Objective 7:
Encourage the construction of green buildings in Old
Town.
Sustainable Development-Objective 8:
Protect water resources and use water wisely.
Sustainable Development-Objective 9:
Protect indoor and outdoor air from contamination
sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Sustainable Development-Objective 10:
Reduce waste by using natural resources wisely.
Sustainable Development-Objective 11:
Improve mobility for all modes of transportation in
Old Town.
Sustainable Development-Objective 12:
Encourage passive and active public open spaces and
protect existing passive and active open spaces within
the Old Town area.
Sustainable Development Goal
Promote sustainability and sustainable
development by using local resources effectively
and efficiently, safeguarding human health and
the environment, maintaining a healthy and
diverse economy, and improving the livability and
quality of life in Old Town.
Sustainable Development Objectives
What is Sustainability?
Sustainability is the ability to meet the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs. Sustainability
benefits the community, the economy and the
environment.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-9
Sustainable Development-Policy 1:
Promote the long-term sustainability of the Old Town
area by encouraging energy and water conservation
measures and practices that result in healthy indoor air
quality.
Sustainable Development – Policy 2:
Encourage the use of renewable energy such as, but
not limited to solar panels and photovoltaic systems,
compact florescent light bulbs, HVAC duct sealing,
efficient shower heads and low flow toilets, water
efficient landscaping and irrigation, and other green
technologies/measures for all new development
projects in Old Town.
Sustainable Development-Policy 3:
Support the use of the latest technologies and
advancements in sustainable development and
sustainable practices.
Sustainable Development-Policy 4:
Ensure that all development and future construction in
the Old Town area comply with the Sustainability Plan
and Climate Action Plan adopted by the City.
Sustainable Development-Policy 5
Construct and certify the Civic Center building in Old
Town to a “LEED Silver” certified level and ensure
that all new municipal buildings in Old Town comply
with the City’s adopted Municipal Green Building
Policy which requires all new municipally owned
buildings to be built to the LEED Certified level
(Resolution No. 08-74).
Sustainable Development-Policy 6:
Encourage the incorporation of various green building
measures and technology into construction projects
when economically feasible.
What is “green building?”
Green building is an integrated “whole-systems” approach to the design, construction and operation of
buildings. Green building incorporates a number of sustainable principles such as water and energy
conservation, waste reduction, the use of renewable energy, indoor air quality measures that result in
health benefits, and the overall reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
Sustainable Development Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-10
Sustainable Development-Policy 7:
Promote resource efficient and healthy buildings by
encouraging the use of no/low VOC (volatile organic
compounds) building materials, the use of recycled
building materials or recycled content, pre-wiring for
PV systems, HVAC tight duct protocols, and other
green building measures, including the proper site
design and layout to promote energy efficiency and the
use of natural light/shade opportunities to reduce
operating costs.
Sustainable Development-Policy 8:
Require that all development in Old Town demonstrate
compliance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape
Ordinance. Protect water quality by encouraging the
use of various Best Management Practices (BMPs),
encourage opportunities for indoor and outdoor water
conservation measures by supporting the use of
drought tolerant plants, the installation of efficient
fixtures such as low-flow faucets, showerheads and
toilets, and other water saving devices or methods.
Sustainable Development-Policy 9:
Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by encouraging the
expansion of an efficient multi-modal alternative
transportation and trail network to support mobility in
the Old Town area.
Sustainable Development-Policy 10:
Promote and expand recycling opportunities by
continuing to implement the residential recycling
program in Old Town neighborhoods, encourage
commercial recycling, maintain the Temecula
Community Services District (TCSD) Construction
and Demolition Debris (C & D) waste recycling
program in Old Town for all construction projects, and
expand opportunities for additional recycling
programs.
Sustainable Development-Policy 11:
Encourage public open spaces throughout Old Town
and require multi-use trail connections, pedestrian
pathways and paseos from future development projects
to Murrieta Creek.
Sustainable Development-Policy 12:
Support the concept of “Smart Growth” and encourage
mixed-use and Transit Oriented Development (TOD)
where feasible and appropriate.
Sustainable Development-Policy 13:
Encourage safe and effective bike and pedestrian
circulation and access, and promote walkability and
connectivity within Old Town through appropriate
development standards, incentives and requirements.
Sustainable Development-Policy 14:
Encourage opportunities for Community Gardens in
the residential areas of Old Town that reflect the
unique character of the community.
Development in Old Town is encouraged to
implement the principles of “smart growth.” This
concept supports alternative transportation
opportunities, walkability and community health.
Connecting future development with bike lanes,
multi-use trails and transportation opportunities
results in the reduction of greenhouse gas.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-11
3. Animating the Public Realm
Streets, sidewalks, parks and other public places unite
our community; they are places where people meet and
mingle, where community members bond and connect,
and where children play. The quality and character of
the public realm in Old Town will play a vital role in
bringing people together. The ease, safety and vitality
of public places will impact how pedestrians
experience Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 1:
Provide for comfortable pedestrian corridors,
alleyways, and walking zones by providing wide
sidewalks, integrated street trees planted next to the
curb and incorporate appropriately placed street
furniture and public art displays in Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 2:
Improve existing public open spaces and create new
public open spaces and gathering areas in Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 3:
Enhance the public realm by encouraging
entertainment oriented uses within the downtown core
and encouraging sidewalk cafes or open-air dining
areas, and outdoor terraces or balconies above the first
story.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 4:
Promote the safety and walkability of the Old Town
area by encouraging the installation of wide sidewalks
along an urban street layout, providing well lit
pedestrian pathways that are separated from vehicular
traffic.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 5:
Encourage large at-grade windows and front door
entrances to help enliven the streets, provide visual
interest for pedestrians, and create synergy within the
Downtown Core District.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 6:
Provide appropriately integrated pedestrian amenities
such as street lighting, pedestrian seating, recycling
and trash receptacles, bike racks, newsstands,
landscaping and street trees into all public spaces in
Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm Goal
To create vibrant public spaces within Old Town by
designing the public realm to establish the
pedestrian as the priority through an imaginative
and walkable streetscape, connectivity and linkages
to features such as public parks, plazas, public
gathering areas, and Murrieta Creek, pedestrian
scale signage and way-finders, the use of public art,
and the continued availability of community events
within Old Town to ultimately activate the pub lic
realm.
Animating the Public Realm Objectives
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-12
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 7:
Encourage connectivity and walkability throughout
Old Town by linking sidewalks, alleyways, trails and
paseos to public areas and open spaces including
public parks, civic areas, public plazas and Murrieta
Creek.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 8:
Provide pedestrian scaled public signage including
way-finders, public directory signs, and gateway
signage in Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 9:
Explore alternative transportation opportunities in Old
Town to support the feasibility of transit oriented
development.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 10:
Utilize public art enhancements and displays to
beautify the public realm.
Animating the Public Ream-Objective 11:
Promote the use of the civic plaza for public
gatherings, outdoor concerts or festivals and other
community events in Old Town. Continue holding city
signature events such as the Rod Run, Bluegrass
Festival, Street Painting Festival and other activities in
Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Objective 12:
Preserve Old Town’s Gateway entry signs to mark the
arrival into the district.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 1:
Require compliance with the Old Town Circulation
and Streetscape Standards and with the established
Sidewalk Zones concept to ensure the design of wide
sidewalks with minimum obstructions and maximum
pedestrian comfort and walkability.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 2:
Require that the placement of street trees and tree
grates, street furniture, pedestrian seating areas, bus
shelters, recycling and trash receptacles, newsstands
and news racks, street lighting, mailboxes, utilities and
public art comply with the Old Town Circulation and
Streetscape Standards and established Sidewalk Zones
concept to enhance the public realm in Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 3:
Ensure that proposals for sidewalk cafes, outdoor
eating areas and terraces comply with the requirements
of Outdoor Dining/Sidewalk Furniture Guidelines and
Supplemental/Special Use Standards.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 4:
Develop appropriate zoning and land use standards that
encourage entertainment oriented uses and
development within the Downtown Core.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 5:
Consider developing incentives that encourage the
development of additional public gathering spaces and
public plazas within the Old Town area.
Animating the Public Realm Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-13
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 6:
As appropriate, require that new development projects
provide pedestrian paseos, open spaces and other
opportunities for connectivity and gathering spaces that
connect and relate to the public realm.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 7:
Continue to improve streets, parks, alleyways, trails,
and other public spaces in accordance with the
objectives and standards of this Specific Plan.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 8:
Encourage public open spaces throughout Old Town
and require multi-use trail connections, pedestrian
pathways and paseos from future development projects
to Murrieta Creek.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 9:
Identify the appropriate areas for public signage
locations, locations for public art, and directory and
directional signage in relation to the pedestrian scale
and public spaces in Old Town.
Animating the Public Realm-Policy 10:
Continue to hold and promote city signature events in
Old Town to maintain the vibrant atmosphere and
enjoyment of the area by residents and visitors alike.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-14
4. Public Art
Public Art-Objective 1:
Enhance the public realm and pedestrian vitality of Old
Town by encouraging art in public places and by
creating an atmosphere that enriches the aesthetic
character of the area.
Public Art-Objective 2:
Expand, cultivate and preserve a collection of diverse
public art in Old Town that is reflective of Temecula’s
historical heritage and diverse identity.
Public Art-Objective 3:
Encourage public art that can be experienced and
enjoyed by people of all ages and backgrounds.
Public Art-Objective 4:
Encourage public art that responds to the challenge of
climate change and promotes sustainability through the
use of sustainable or recycled building materials and
sustainable fabrication methods.
Public Art-Objective 5:
Cultivate a community identity in Old Town through
the display of public art and promote economic vitality
in the area by using public art displays to “brand” Old
Town as a destination for cultural tourism.
Public Art-Objective 6:
Utilize public plazas, gateways, trails, parks,
alleyways, civic areas, streets and other public spaces
to exhibit high quality works of art and ensure public
access and enjoyment of such displays.
Public Art-Objective 7:
Develop or encourage the development of first-class
venues for artistic production, performances, exhibits,
displays and cultural education, and the cultivation of
art in Old Town.
Public Art-Objective 8:
Encourage the development of artist live/work
residential units and arts-related commercial including
but not limited to art education facilities and studio
space available for rent to cultivate a vibrant arts
district in the heart of Old Town.
Public Art-Objective 9:
Facilitate the siting of, and programming for, a
municipal art gallery, and promote the establishment of
commercial art galleries in the Old Town area.
Public Art-Objective 10:
Seek funding opportunities that support Old Town’s art
and cultural assets.
Public Art Goal
Create a dynamic sense-of-place and unique identity
for Old Town by weaving art into the Old Town area,
cultivating imaginative artistic expression, and
promoting the display and placement of art in the
public realm.
Public Art Objectives
This beautiful, brightly colored tile mural pictured
above is called “A Children’s Wonderland.” It adds a
colorful backsplash to a large wall surface at the
Temecula Library.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-15
Public Art-Policy 1:
Ensure the establishment, preservation and
maintenance of a public art collection in the Old Town
area by requiring compliance with the City’s Art
Ordinance and the Art in Public Places Developer
Guidelines.
Public Art-Policy 2:
Require that all public art displays in Old Town are
granted approval by the Community Services
Commission.
Public Art-Policy 3:
Identify appropriate public art sites throughout the Old
Town area, including but not limited to parks, trails,
civic plazas, and public buildings as a part of Public
Works CIP projects, etc.
Public Art-Policy 4:
Establish and maintain zoning and land use standards
and design guidelines that encourage cultural arts
related uses/development in Old Town to promote Old
Town as Temecula’s cultural arts district.
Public Art-Policy 5:
Establish city-owned and privately-owned art galleries
to promote networking opportunities for artists and
cultural heritage organizations and agencies.
Public Art-Policy 6:
Explore opportunities and establish zoning and land
use standards to allow for artist live-work space and
artist housing in Old Town.
Public Art-Policy 7:
Promote the adaptive re-use of buildings in Old Town
to encourage the development or redevelopment of arts
related venues.
Public Art-Policy 8:
Analyze the possibility of incorporating cultural arts
facilities or displays into appropriate municipal
development projects in Old Town.
Public Art Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
This historically relevant painted
mural called “The History of
Temecula” depicts an image of a
train and is reminiscent of
Temecula’s past as a productive
boomtown. The arrival of the
railroad into the area in 1882
marked an important time period for
Temecula. This mural is located on
the façade of a building located on
Sixth Street in Old Town at the Old
Town Temecula Bus Depot.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-16
Public Art-Policy 9:
Establish partnerships with public and private entities,
such as the Temecula Valley Unified School District
(TVUSD), Arts Council of Temecula Valley,
Pennypickles-Temecula Children’s Museum, the
Temecula History Museum, and the Old Town
Temecula Theatre to facilitate arts education
opportunities in Old Town.
Public Art-Policy 10:
Raise awareness and understanding of art in public
places through education and community involvement
in Old Town.
Public Art-Policy 11:
Develop a Cultural Heritage and The Arts Marketing
Plan for the Old Town area.
Public Art-Policy 12:
Where feasible, incorporate community-based uses
into the Old Town History Museum to support the arts,
which may include use for visual arts exhibitions and
classrooms and/or meeting and office space for non-
profit arts and cultural groups.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
This intricately crafted tile mosaic piece is appropriately named “Imagination”
and is located in the Temecula Public Library. It evokes thought and promotes
creativity for all visitors and those who observe its brilliance and beauty.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-17
5. Land Use/Economics
The health of the local economy in Old Town is
directly related to the efficient use of land and
resources within the Specific Plan area. Efficient and
well thought-out land use patterns support economic
health and impact the quality of life within a
community. Old Town is envisioned to function as
Temecula’s urban town center. It is a place known for
its vitality, and is seen as a d esirable place for people
to live, work and play. Old Town’s economic strength
is based upon its ability to attract and maintain a
combination of specialty retail, restaurant and
entertainment oriented uses, multi- and single-family
residential housing opportunities, civic and cultural
facilities, and adequate parking. Together they will
preserve the area as Temecula’s vibrant downtown.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 1:
Maximize the economic development potential of Old
Town through well defined land use districts, and
encourage a balanced mix of land uses that provide a
sound economic base.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 2:
Encourage a broad range of land uses in Old Town that
provide a diverse mix of commercial, office, and
mixed-use development and a suitable and diverse
inventory of residential housing opportunities to
support the varied needs of the community, attract
employment, and promote business opportunities to
ultimately improve the jobs/housing balance.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 3:
Upgrade underutilized parcels that are currently
functioning at less than their market potential and
encourage their highest and best use.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 4:
Through economic development activities and
incentives, focus on attracting new commercial, retail
and office uses to Old Town which will add to the
unique character and economic vitality of the area,
while retaining existing development and businesses.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 5:
Promote and recognize Old Town’s potential as a “24-
hour” destination by attracting a mix of daytime and
nighttime uses into the area, including restaurants,
commercial retail uses, hotels and residential
development.
Land Use/Economics Goal
Establish Old Town as the focal point for social,
cultural, and civic activities, continue to promote
local tourism opportunities and attractions that will
continue to transform Old Town into a premier
southern California destination, and strengthen the
existing economic base by implementing strategic
and broad-range land use and economic
development planning programs that result in an
efficient, well-balanced community, a strong market
potential in Old Town, and a sound fiscal
foundation for the future.
Land Use/Economics Objectives
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-18
Land Use/Economics-Objective 6:
Recognize the significant economic benefits of
dispersing public open spaces such as parks, plazas,
trails, paseos, linear parks and landscaped areas
throughout Old Town, and acknowledge the
importance of connecting these public open spaces to
surrounding commercial, residential, civic, and mixed-
use developments.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 7:
Recognize the importance of supporting land uses,
businesses, and local commerce with a well-connected
multi-modal transportation network which includes:
alternative transportation infrastructure, multi-use
trails, bikeways, streets, alleys, and sidewalks.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 8:
Encourage projects located within the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District in Old Town
to include both residential and neighborhood
commercial oriented uses when appropriate and
compatible with surrounding uses and development in
the area.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 9:
Encourage projects within the Downtown Core to
include residential units constructed above the
specialty retail/commercial oriented uses on the ground
floor.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 10:
Encourage a mix of densities, housing types, and the
concentration of a residential population in Old Town
to support the surrounding commercial uses and
businesses.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 11:
Encourage shared parking facilities in Old Town and
promote the construction of parking structures, podium
parking, subterranean parking, or other appropriate
parking facilities as necessary to support local
businesses and development.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 12:
Recognize the importance of logical planning policy,
well thought out urban design, and the community’s
quality of life, and how they relate to, and are mutually
dependent upon, private economics including market
demand and market feasibility.
Land Use/Economics-Objective 13:
Recognize and take advantage of market strengths
including the rapid growth and significant investment
in Old Town. Remain cognizant of the changing
demographics of the population and how this impacts
the needs of the community and the economic market.
Remain aware of the rising land values and shrinking
inventory of vacant land in Old Town, and pursue
opportunities that have the potential to strengthen the
local economy.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-19
Land Use/Economics-Policy 1: Pursue an “Old Town
Branding and Marketing Plan” to support and maintain
a healthy local economy in Old Town and encourage
future economic development.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 2:
Implement regulations that promote pedestrian oriented
plazas, courtyards and other open space.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 3:
Encourage active retail commercial uses and high-
quality residential uses in the Downtown Core District
of Old Town.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 4:
Implement urban development standards and design
guidelines that clearly define the design expectations
for new development in the Old Town area.
Land Use Economics-Policy 5:
Ensure compatibility between both existing and new
commercial uses, and existing and new residential
uses.
Land Use Economics-Policy 6:
Require well-designed and well-integrated land uses by
emphasizing the importance of land use compatibility
and sensitivity to nearby businesses and to residential
uses within, and adjacent to, commercial districts in
Old Town.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 7:
Discourage land uses such as automotive sales, service
and repair, fast food drive-thrus, and mini marts in Old
Town.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 8:
Establish assistance programs to aid property and
businesses owners with property improvements that
further the implementation of the goals, objectives and
policies of the Old Town Specific Plan.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 9:
Recognize and market Old Town as an ideal location
for boutique hotels, bed and breakfast establishments,
conference hotels and hotel/tourist oriented support
uses, by implementing the Hotel Overlay in the
Downtown Core.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 10:
Promote and pursue opportunities to co-market Old
Town and wine country.
Land Use /Economics-Policy 11:
Use redevelopment powers and opportunities as a tool
to enhance and encourage development and promote
the revitalization of older commercial areas in Old
Town.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 12:
Establish land use and development guidelines that
encourage land uses that will support and promote both
daytime and nighttime activity in Old Town.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 13:
Encourage nighttime oriented uses of projects while
also being sensitive to nearby businesses and to
residents living in the Old Town area.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 14:
Recognize that new residential housing opportunities
and the presence of a concentrated residential
population in Old Town is essential to expanding the
retail and economic base.
Land Use/Economics Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-20
Land Use/Economics-Policy 15:
Develop land use standards that require ground floor
retail and restaurants along Main Street, Old Town
Front Street, and near the civic center.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 16:
Recognize the importance of adequate parking
facilities in Old Town to support the mix of residential
and commercial land uses and varying intensities of
development.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 17:
Take advantage of shared parking opportunities,
resources, and the civic center parking garage.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 18:
Develop land use and development standards and
guidelines that encourage tuck under parking, as
opposed to at-grade building adjacent parking lots, for
multi-family residential, commercial and mixed-use
development projects.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-21
Land Use/Economics-Policy 19:
Establish land use districts, land use designations and
zoning in Old Town that will attract development
opportunities and uses that will result in the
establishment of a self contained downtown
community and local economy, complete with uses
that provide and attract well-paying jobs, diverse and
reasonably priced housing opportunities, and
community amenities such as nearby open spaces and
outdoor recreational facilities, restaurants, shopping
opportunities and entertainment venues that are
supported by a multi-modal transportation network.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 20:
Identify multi-modal alternative transportation
opportunities in Old Town and encourage the
development of high quality mixed-use and transit
oriented development that will make the expansion of
the alternative transportation network feasible, and
make business enterprises in Old Town more viable
and accessible to consumers in the immediate and
surrounding communities.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 21:
Provide and maintain a high-quality of life in Old
Town to attract a highly-prized, talented, and
productive workforce and improve the job/housing
balance. Promote the concept of a self-contained
downtown community and local economy in Old
Town, where high-paying jobs and affordable housing
are available in close proximity to one another,
allowing for residents to live, work and play locally,
resulting in the support of the local economy and tax
base of the city.
Land Use/Economics-Policy 22:
Pursue funding opportunities to construct and maintain
new directory signage, new directional way finding
signage, and City Sponsored Special Event/light pole
banner signage in Old Town.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-22
6. Housing Renaissance
The revitalization efforts and recent development
boom in Old Town has resulted in a re-awakening of
the area that is desirable to sustain in the future. This
growth has brought new life into this historic
downtown area, as well as within the surrounding
neighborhoods, and has sparked an interest for the
development of more residential and mixed -use
development in Old Town.
Accommodating neighborhoods and residents in Old
Town, and providing the quality of life that is expected
by residents, means ensuring the construction of public
spaces such as parks and trails in Old Town,
maintaining pedestrian-friendly streets, and providing a
range of housing opportunities that meet the diverse
needs of the community. It also means demanding the
high quality development of neighborhoods and
convenient neighborhood commercial oriented uses
that support the needs of the nearby residents.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 1:
Encourage an even mix (50/50) of commercial and
residential development in the Old Town area.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 2:
Promote the construction of mixed-use development
that includes a residential component in the Downtown
Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use Districts.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 3:
Encourage the development of community facilities
such as public and private parks, trails, recreational
amenities and civic plazas to support the surrounding
neighborhoods.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 4:
Require the establishment and preservation of
pedestrian-friendly streets, sidewalks and trails that
provide a comfortable and convenient pedestrian
experience for residents in the area.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 5:
Encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and
access from the Neighborhood Residential and
Residential Limited Mixed-Use areas into the
Downtown Core and Civic Districts.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 6:
Encourage and promote the development of a wide
array of housing types and housing opportunities to
accommodate the diverse needs of the community.
Housing Renaissance Goal
Encourage historically relevant and high-quality
housing opportunities for a diverse range of needs
and encourage commercial land uses that support
the surrounding neighborhoods while improving the
overall residential livability of Old Town.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Housing Renaissance Objectives
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-23
Housing Renaissance-Objective 7:
Consider offering incentives to developers that
designate a portion of their project as low or moderate
income housing and recommend the dispersion of low
and moderate income housing throughout various
projects in the Old Town area.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 8:
Maximize housing opportunities by promoting efficient
use of land and resources.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 9:
Preserve the historic and unique character of Old Town
by ensuring that new residential development,
remodels and additions exhibit the highest standards of
authentic architecture and urban design in context with
development in Temecula from the 1880s-1940s time
period.
Housing Renaissance-Objective 10:
Encourage gated openings at the end of trails and cul-
de-sacs to connect neighborhoods to the public realm ,
thereby avoiding dead-end walkways and providing
pedestrian connectivity throughout Old Town.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 1:
Establish zoning and development standards that
promote the 50/50 mix of commercial and residential
development in the Old Town Area.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 2:
Establish zoning and land use standards that encourage
neighborhood commercial and residential-serving land
uses to support the presence of residents in the Old
Town area.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 3:
Establish zoning and development standards that
produce high-quality residential development projects
that are sensitive to the historical character of Old
Town. Require that all residential development
projects, including remodels, adhere to the Old Town
Design Guidelines and urban standards to sustain an
eclectic mix of historically relevant architectural styles.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 4:
Promote the walkability and connectivity of
neighborhoods and residences by requiring that all
residential development projects provide
walkways/bikeways and pedestrian/bicycle access to
Murrieta Creek and to public areas such as parks, trails,
sidewalks, streets and paseos. Encourage the provision
of openings or gated openings at the end of trails and
cul-de-sacs to connect neighborhoods and residences to
the public realm and to avoid dead-end walkways and
trails.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Housing Renaissance Policies
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-24
Housing Renaissance-Policy 5:
Continue to partner with non-profits, such as Habitat
for Humanity, private housing developers, and public
agencies to facilitate the production of a range of
affordable housing, live-work spaces, and low and
moderate income housing.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 6:
Partner with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency to
target expenditures of set-aside funds for housing
production and economic re-investment, including land
assembly, new programs and other housing strategies
to increase housing opportunities to serve the diverse
needs of the community.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 7:
Maintain the first-time home buyer program through
the Redevelopment Agency and promote this program
to help support home ownership in Old Town.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 8:
Require adequate lighting to improve pedestrian safety
and require the placement of buildings on a lot in such
a manner that keeps the “eyes on the street” to promote
the security and well-being of residents in the Old
Town area.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 9:
Discourage the accumulation of low and moderate
income housing projects in one geographic area of Old
Town by encouraging developers to designate a portion
of their units as low or moderate income housing units
throughout the Old Town area.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 10:
Maintain an inventory of vacant or under-utilized
parcels in Old Town and provide the inventory to
interested developers in conjunction with information
on available development incentive programs.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 11:
Consider various incentives such as reducing parking
requirements, reducing the landscaping requirements,
increasing building heights, and modifying the setback
requirements for low and moderate income housing
units to reduce developer burdens.
Housing Renaissance-Policy 12:
Develop a strategy to market residential reuse
opportunities on deteriorating commercial properties.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-25
7. Mobility and Transportation
Old Town is envisioned to develop as a pedestrian-
friendly, vibrant downtown. The activity that is
expected to occur by those biking, walking and getting
around the area requires that the entire right-of-way in
Old Town be oriented toward the safety and comfort of
the pedestrian, while concurrently encouraging the use
of transit. These principles, as well as the anticipated
increase in activity in the Old Town area , require that
the streets become less auto-oriented and more
pedestrian and people oriented.
Through this concept, the “streets” have taken on a
whole new meaning. Streets are no longer places
designated primarily for the fast-paced, high volume
movement of cars, trucks and other motorized vehicles;
the concept of a “street” has now been expanded to
include the safe, efficient movement of all pedestrians
- including young school age children, elderly citizens,
and those with disabilities. The new concept of a
“street” not only includes facilities that support the
pedestrian experience and encourage walkability an d
mobility for all, but also include facilities that support
the transit user and promote the use of alternative
modes of transportation. This new concept of a
“street” creates more livable neighborhoods and
promotes community health by accommodating all
users. “Streets” now include bike ways for bicyclists,
wide sidewalks for pedestrians, as well as trolley and
bus routes for transit users. These complete “streets”
and related multi-modal transportation networks link
the people and places in Old Town to surrounding
communities, and connect surrounding communities to
Old Town.
The transportation and circulation network in Old
Town is made up of a clear grid pattern of streets,
alleyways and sidewalks. It is also supported by a
secondary, but equally important, network of multi-use
trails, bikeways, paseos, and other pedestrian oriented
pathways. This intricate transportation network is
intended to support not only the circulation and access
of motorized vehicles, but is also expected to provide
safe, comfortable and logically planned pedestrian
facilities that enable mobility for those exploring Old
Town by bike, on foot, or by other means, such as a
wheelchair.
The “streets” in Old Town are intended to provide safe
pathways to and from alternative modes of
transportation, such as a bus or trolley stops, and to
provide safe routes to school for all children living in
and around the Old Town area. The “streets” in Old
Town are also intended to offer secure, convenient and
walkable routes to neighborhood conveniences, parks
and open spaces, and support those that live, work and
play in the Old Town area.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
What is walkability?
Walkability in a community is achieved through an
equal balance between the needs of cars and the needs
of all pedestrians. Walkable communities acknowledge
the importance between land use patterns and the
associated multi-modal transportation network – there is
an understanding that land use and transportation are
mutually dependant, and their relationship must be
carefully balanced to attain a walkable community.
Walkable communities are often compactly designed and
include an efficient network of traffic calmed streets
supported by, and connected to, an alternative
transportation network of bus routes, alleyways, trails,
bike routes and sidewalks, which in turn are supported
by appropriate land use patterns. Walkable communities
are livable and healthy communities. They reduce
greenhouse gas emissions by reducing vehicle trips,
promote a more active lifestyle, encourage social
interaction and community cohesiveness, and facilitate
convenience because most daily needs can be satisfied
within a short walk or bike ride.
Mobility and Transportation Goal
Achieve an equal balance between the needs of cars
and people in Old Town and ensure that the “streets”
accommodate all users including pedestrians of all
ages, cyclists, alternative transportation modes and
cars, recognize that the circulation network includes
the streets, alleyways, sidewalks, multi-use trails,
paseos, and other pathways that support the transit
network and the movement of people in Old Town and
acknowledge that land use, housing and the
transportation network are mutually dependent and
their careful balance supports efficient mobility.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-26
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 1:
Ensure that Old Town is pedestrian friendly and easily
walkable for all users by requiring that the sidewalks
and streets accommodate those traveling by foot, bike
or other means.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 2:
Ensure that the pedestrian network of sidewalks,
paseos, and trails support and connect to the transit
network in Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 3:
Support the concept of “Smart Growth,” mixed-use,
and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) in Old Town
to expand the availability and feasibility of alternative
transportation opportunities in the area.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 4:
Ensure connectivity and access throughout Old Town
to promote walkability.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 5:
Recognize the relationship between land use, housing,
and the circulation network in Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 6:
Recognize that the streets, sidewalks, trails and
bikeways are all part of the transportation network in
Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 7:
Work closely with RTA to provide safe, comfortable
and attractive transit stops to reduce auto dependency
and increase transit ridership.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 8:
Promote the concept of “complete streets” in Old
Town to make mobility and pedestrian access for all
users a priority for the area.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 9:
Seek additional funding opportunities to support the
Trolley, and/or other transit opportunities in Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 10:
Strive to make Old Town more walkable so that
walking or biking is the mode of choice for short trips.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 11:
Recognize that providing a safe walking and biking
environment is an essential part of improving public
mobility and alternative transportation in Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Objective 12:
Consider a provision for a vehicular/pedestrian creek
crossing at Sixth Street, a “pedestrian only” bridge
crossing at Third Street, and consider a provision for a
pedestrian bridge from Moreno Road over Interstate-15
to Rancho Highlands located to the east.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
What is Transit Oriented Development (TOD)?
Transit Oriented Development, or “smart growth,”
is a planning principle that recognizes the mutual
dependence between land use planning and mobility
planning which results in development that is
efficient and convenient by supporting the
movement of people by transit, foot, bicycle or other
means. Transit oriented development normally
includes a mix of land uses including residential
development, neighborhood commercial-type uses
and employment in close proximity to multi-use
trails and transit stops.
Mobility and Transportation Objectives
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-27
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 1:
Maintain the existing historic streets and alleys grid
pattern in Old Town and seek opportunities to enhance
the existing circulation network with pedestrian
friendly and bicycle oriented connections.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 2:
Expand the existing road network at Sixth Street, Main
Street and First Street southwest of Old Town Front
Street to reach Pujol Street and the future western
bypass.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 3:
Ensure that the streets in Old Town enable safe and
efficient mobility and access for all users including
pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit riders, and
those of all ages including children and elderly
citizens, and those with disabilities or impairments.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 4:
Adopt a “Complete Streets” policy (AB 1358) for Old
Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 5:
Require coordination between Planning, Public Works
and local transportation agencies to promote the
expansion of transit opportunities in Old Town.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 6:
Require coordination between Planning, Public Works
and local transportation agencies to determine the
appropriate location of additional transit stops in Old
Town. Transit stops should be located near major
activity nodes, employment and population centers.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 7:
Require facilities that provide pedestrian safety and
comfort including bus shelters, and shade trees at all
transit stops.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 8:
Require that all projects in Old Town comply with the
Circulation and Streetscape Standards contained in
Chapter IV.H of this Specific Plan.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 9:
Require that all projects in Old Town reflect the
desired pedestrian scale of the area through appropriate
building design, layout and connectivity to adjacent
trails, paseos, sidewalks and other pedestrian oriented
travel-ways including Murrieta Creek.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 10:
Develop land use standards and design guidelines that
ensure walkability and require pedestrian connectivity
to transit stops, multi-use trails, open space, parks, and
other nearby pedestrian oriented facilities.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 11:
Continue to pursue funding to ensure the completion of
the multi-use trail network and improvements
associated with the Murrieta Creek Improvement
Project.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 12:
Pursue opportunities to connect trails, bikeways and
sidewalks where missing connections exist in Old
Town.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Mobility and Transportation Policy
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-28
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 13:
Require the placement of pedestrian amenities that
ensure the safety and comfort of the pedestrian such as
street trees, bus shelters and bus signage, adequate
lighting, clearly marked crosswalks, bikeways and
trails, bike racks and other amenities as appropriate.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 14:
Encourage pedestrian activity by constructing
pedestrian crossings at Sixth Street (pedestrians and
vehicles) and Third Street (pedestrians only) as
consistent with the mitigation contained in the Traffic
Impact Analysis dated December 16, 2009.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 15:
Require the installation of traffic roundabouts at Old
Town Front Street and Moreno Road (south) and at
Old Town Front Street and Mercedes/First
Street/Santiago Road. Additionally, install various
traffic calming measures in Old Town, as warranted,
depending on the future growth and activity in the area.
Consider the following traffic calming methods
including speed tables/raised intersections and
designated/marked crosswalks.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 16:
Provide additional crosswalks, or enhanced crosswalk
treatments at key intersections such as near transit
stops, major shopping and entertainment areas, and
adjacent to the civic center and civic center parking
structure.
Mobility and Transportation-Policy 17:
Avoid dead-end walkways by encouraging gated
openings at the end of trails, cul-de-sacs, paseos and
courtyards to connect adjacent residential
neighborhoods to the Downtown Core and
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-29
8. Parking Management
Efficient parking management in Old Town will ensure
the most resourceful use of existing parking facilities
and improve the quality of the experience for those
who may visit the Old Town area. Ensuring that safe
and adequate parking is provided in Old Town will
support accessibility to local businesses, sustain local
commerce, create a more pedestrian oriented
environment, and prove to have environmental benefits
if drivers do not have to circle the block to find an
open parking space. The “park once” parking
management strategy will also promote more
pedestrian movement in the area by encouraging
people visiting Old Town to park only one time and
explore multiple businesses by foot.
The Old Town Temecula Parking Management
Strategy will provide the policy guidelines to
incrementally phase in a myriad of parking
management strategies over time to ensure that
adequate parking is provided as Old Town grows and
develops to build-out.
Parking Management-Objective 1:
Pursue a “Park Once” strategy in Old Town and
implement strategies that encourage people who visit
Old Town to park one time and visit multiple
businesses.
Parking Management-Objective 2:
Encourage shared parking and consider developing
incentives to promote shared parking when a use or
development project is required to provide private
parking facilities in Old Town.
Parking Management-Objective 3:
Encourage, but not require, private parking where the
need is determined to be significant due to a unique
land use or the unique characteristics of a given
development project.
Parking Management-Objective 4:
Make better use of existing parking in Old Town and
incrementally add parking facilities as necessary.
Approach parking in Old Town holistically and
exhaust all parking demand management options
before investing in additional parking facilities,
including additional parking garages.
Parking Management-Objective 5:
Utilize the recommended implementation programs
and timeframes outlined in the Old Town Parking
Management Plan.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
Parking Management Goal
Incrementally facilitate parking strategies in Old
Town in accordance with the Old Town Parking
Management Plan by providing safe, adequate, and
accessible parking throughout the area, and by
ensuring that all parking facilities in Old Town
support the safe movement of pedestrians and
vehicles to adequately support the expansion of
local commerce.
Parking Management Objectives
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-30
Parking Management-Objective 6:
Provide clearly marked, easily identifiable, adequate
and accessible parking facilities within an organized
and consistent circulation system throughout the Old
Town area.
Parking Management-Objective 7:
Redirect local through traffic vehicular trips away from
Old Town Front Street onto the future western bypass
road.
Parking Management-Objective 8:
Recognize the importance of developing and
maintaining parking information programs relate d to
parking facilities and parking availability in Old Town.
Parking Management-Objective 9:
Ensure that the merchants and business owners have a
vested interest in the establishment of a Commercial
Parking Benefit District and in ensuring that there is
sufficient parking in Old Town. Update the parking
management plan regularly to ensure that the parking
strategies are being implemented in a timely manner
and as consistent with the overall occupancy, growth
and demand in Old Town.
Parking Management-Policy 1:
Ensure that the future growth of Old Town coincides
with the strategies, implementations and
recommendations contained in the Old Town Parking
Management Plan (Section VI. D)
Parking Management-Policy 2:
Prepare parking utilization studies annually and
incrementally and incrementally institute parking time
limits in high parking demand areas when parking
space occupancy reaches 85 percent.
Parking Management-Policy 3:
Pursue the implementation of near-term (1-2 years)
parking management strategies, as outlined in the Old
Town Parking Management (Section VI .D) including
setting parking time limits on Old Town Front Street,
developing informational programs, and establishing a
Commercial Parking Benefit District in Old Town.
Parking Management-Policy 4:
Once parking time limits are implemented, review
these parking limits every 2 years to determine if a
modification in the hourly limits should be
implemented.
Parking Management-Policy 5:
Once occupancy thresholds are reached, as outlined in
the Old Town Parking Management Plan (Section
VI.D), pursue implementation of mid-term (3-10 years)
parking management strategies including expanding
parking time limits beyond Old Town Front Street,
beginning the first phase of parking charges for spaces
along Old Town Front Street, and beginning the design
and construction of additional parking garages once all
other strategies have been implemented.
Parking Management Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-31
Parking Management-Policy 6:
Analyze and establish parking performance
benchmarks to guide the incremental implementation
of parking charges in Old Town.
Parking Management-Policy 7:
Once occupancy thresholds are reached, as outlined in
the Old Town Parking Management Plan (Section
VI.D), pursue implementation of long-term (10+ years)
parking management strategies which include
expanding public parking facilities through the design
and construction of a second parking garage, and
expanding the phased implementation of parking
charges beyond Old Town Front Street.
Parking Management-Policy 8:
Develop an Old Town Parking Webpage that includes
information on parking facility locations, the cost of
parking, hours of operation and nearby transit facilities
in Old Town as a part of a public outreach program.
Parking Management-Policy 9:
Develop and maintain an informational map to be
included on the Old Town Parking Webpage, on
marketing brochures, and Old Town Directory Signs,
showing the location of parking within Old Town and
update the map as additional parking information and
facilities come on-line.
Parking Management-Policy 10:
Maintain informational signs at each entrance into Old
Town that list the location of major public parking
facilities including the civic center parking garage.
Parking Management-Policy 11:
Draft and adopt a Commercial Parking Benefit District
Ordinance to establish the boundaries, duties and
organization of the parking district in Old Town.
Require that all decisions of the district are subject to
final approval by the City Council.
Parking Management-Policy 12:
Require that revenues from parking charges are used to
fund parking facilities and also ensure that the
revenues are reinvested into Old Town to pay for
parking facility maintenance and streetscape
improvements and maintenance.
Parking Management-Policy 13:
Consider charging for parking in public garages only
after charges have been established for on-street
parking spaces in Old Town.
Parking Management-Policy 14:
Consider variation in parking charges through
discounted employee parking passes and validation
coupons to allow for local businesses to reduce the
costs of parking to customers and employees.
Parking Management-Policy 15:
Consider purchasing private parking spaces or leasing
existing private parking spaces from willing property
owners to add to the shared public parking supply.
Parking Management-Policy 16:
Encourage that private parking lots be made available
for public use outside the dedicated time period need ed
by the owner or specific use. Shared parking shall be
allowed through the recordation of a shared parking
agreement which clearly shows there is no conflict in
the hours of operation between the parties involved in
the agreement.
Parking Management-Policy 17:
Provide adequate parking identification signs for all
public parking areas not directly visible from the street.
Parking Management-Policy 18:
Require that parking is provided as consistent with the
Old Town Specific Plan Land Use and Urban
Development Standards.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-32
Parking Management-Policy 19:
Utilize landscape and hardscape design features to
soften parking and pedestrian areas for new and
existing development and public parking lots.
Parking Management-Policy 20:
Encourage the efficient use of alleyways and rear
building entrances to minimize the necessity for access
to parking facilities off primary and secondary streets.
Parking Management-Policy 21:
Provide adequate parking and parking facilities at the
north and south end of Old Town.
Parking Management-Policy 22:
Prohibit unscreened parking lots and public parking
facilities directly adjacent to the street and along
Murrieta Creek. Architectural integration of parking
facilities combined with appropriate screening methods
such as the use of landscape buffering techniques shall
be utilized to screen and soften parking facilities in Old
Town.
Parking Management-Policy 23:
Require that all parking garages in Old Town be
architecturally compatible with the surrounding
development and require the screening and softening of
these structures through architectural features and/or
heavy landscaping where appropriate.
Parking Management-Policy 24:
Consider designating truck routes and weight limits for
streets in Old Town.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
As required by the Old Town
Temecula Parking Management
Strategy, parking facilities should be
used in the most efficient manner
possible and should serve various
businesses from one lot.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-33
9. Murrieta Creek
Murrieta Creek and the neighboring hillsides provide a
beautiful backdrop and serene setting for Old Town.
The connection between the natural and the built
environment heavily influences the character and
ambiance of a community and Old Town’s future
development will be shaped by its proximity and
connection to Murrieta Creek. Murrieta Creek runs
through the heart of Old Town, providing an active
wildlife corridor at Old Town’s core and presenting the
opportunity for a wildlife corridor to co-exist within an
urbanized area. Murrieta Creek enhances the built
environment in Old Town, provides a vital connection
to nature and open spaces, and provides a natural
recreational amenity to be enjoyed by all.
In addition to the picturesque quality that Murrieta
Creek brings to Old Town, it also supports a unique
ecosystem which includes a variety of wetland species,
plant life, sensitive habitat, and biological resources.
Murrieta Creek provides a vital natural connection for
wildlife movement and is an ideal place for residents
and visitors to observe a variety of native plant and
animal species and enjoy the natural environment.
Murrieta Creek and its associated ecosystems have
been identified as an area of “extremely high concern”
by several resource agencies, including the U.S.
Department of Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. These agencies
have indicated that Murrieta Creek is the last high
quality, minimally disturbed Riverine environment in
Southern California. Consequently, the preservation of
Murrieta Creek and its compatibility with Old Town’s
future development is essential to its maintenance as a
vital ecological resource.
It is also important to note that Murrieta Creek leads
into the beginning of the Santa Margarita River system
that is located just one mile downstream from Santiago
Road. The Santa Margarita River is one of the last free
flowing rivers in Southern California and it is hom e to
500 plant species, 236 bird species, 52 mammal
species, 42 reptile species, 26 fish species, and 24
aquatic invertebrates.
Murrieta Creek Goal
Preserve Murrieta Creek’s existing ecosystems,
restore degraded habitat and biological
resources, promote Murrieta Creek as a natural
recreational amenity and wildlife observation
corridor, create a sense-of-connection between
the natural and built environment in Old Town,
and ensure adequate flood protection for all future
development.
As a part of Flood Control’s Murrieta Creek Improvement Project, over 160 acres will be planted with native riparian vegetation. This will provide habitat value to a
number of critical species and preserve the ecosystem and biological resources of Murrieta Creek.
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-34
Murrieta Creek connects to Temecula Creek just short of the Santa Ma rgarita River. The Santa Margarita River
continues to flow west to the Pacific Ocean. Murrieta Creek and its associated ecosystems have been identified
as an area of “extremely high concern” by several resource agencies. Murrieta Creek is the last high -quality,
minimally disturbed riverine environment in southern California. The Santa Margarita River is pictured above.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 1:
Preserve Murrieta Creek’s existing ecosystem,
including critical/sensitive habitat, biological
resources, hydrological resources, and wildlife/plant
species that are of “extremely high concern” to
resource agencies and to the City.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 2:
Encourage the restoration of degraded habitat and
ecological resources associated with Murrieta Creek
and the surrounding open space areas.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 3:
Re-connect Murrieta Creek with Old Town’s urban
downtown and residential core by establishing
appropriate zoning and development standards that
require connectivity from development projects in Old
Town to the Murrieta Creek.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 4:
Utilize the creek as a natural amenity for all future
development in Old Town.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 5:
Ensure that the future Murrieta Creek Environ mental
Restoration and Recreation Project improvements will
be aesthetically compatible with the future vision for
Old Town.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 6:
Coordinate improvement efforts with Riverside County
Flood Control to secure funding sources for the project
to ensure the completion of the Murrieta Creek
Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project.
Murrieta Creek-Objective 7:
Reduce the threat of flood to the area and ensure
adequate flood protection in Old Town to maintain the
health, safety and welfare of the public.
Murrieta Creek Objectives
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-35
Murrieta Creek-Policy 1:
Work with state, regional and local non -profit agencies
and organizations to preserve, protect and maintain the
biological and ecological resources associated with
Murrieta Creek.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 2:
Require that all new development projects exhibit
consistency with the Riverside County Multi-Species
Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and require
biological assessments for new development projects,
when necessary, to preserve Murrieta Creek’s
ecological and biological resources.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 3:
Regulate or manage lands adjacent to or affecting
Murrieta Creek as stipulated by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 4:
Increase pedestrian accessibility to Murrieta Creek by
requiring an interconnected network of sidewalks, bike
paths, pedestrian walkways, paseos, and multi-use
trails between Murrieta Creek and development
projects located in the Downtown Core and
surrounding residential district.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 5:
Require that all projects adjacent to Murrieta Creek
“front” the creek to encourage connectivity in Old
Town and maintain walkability along the creek.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 6:
Maintain the channel walls of the creek in their natural
state whenever possible by coordinating with Riverside
County Flood Control, the Army Corp of Engineers,
California Department of Fish and Game, and the San
Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, to
accomplish the desired natural character of the
Murrieta Creek improvements.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 7:
Ensure that the creek improvements incorporate living
native plant materials which are indigenous to a
watershed area and reduce the extent of undesired
exotic species that would negatively impact Murrieta
Creek’s ecosystem, Riverine environment and
biological resources.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 8:
Encourage the placement of public art displays along
the creek trails that promote the creek as an outdoor
amenity and wildlife viewing area. Way-finders that
are related to the wildlife or plant species associated
with Murrieta Creek may be appropriate to “tell a
story” along the adjacent trails or pathways.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 9:
Implement the City’s water quality program and
require all new development projects in Old Town to
implement water quality measures to eliminate
pollutants and decrease the runoff from these projects
in order to protect and enhance the water quality in
Murrieta Creek and connected watersheds.
Murrieta Creek-Policy 10:
Require pedestrian oriented connections such as trails
and plazas, and required pedestrian oriented amenities
including seating and public wildlife viewing areas
along Murrieta Creek as part of the normal
development review process.
Murrieta Creek Policies
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
In January and February of 1993, Riverside
County experienced severe storms which resulted
in flooding in the Old Town area. The storm
caused more than $10 million dollars in damages
along Murrieta Creek. Flood Control’s Murrieta
Creek Restoration and Recreation Project is
intended to restore lost habitat, better protect Old
Town from flooding, and provide a connection
between nature and the built environment. The
future Murrieta Creek Restoration project
includes a trail network along the creek channel
which will include recreational opportunities,
wildlife viewing areas, and will provide Old Town
residents and visitors a natural environment
within the urban core.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan II-36
(This page is left blank intentionally).
II. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-1
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
CONTENTS:
A. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………….…..…………. III-2
B. Authority for the Plan ……………………………………………………………………………………..……………………………….……...………. III-2
C. Relationship to the General Plan …………………………………………………………………………...………………………………..………..…… III-2
D. Relationship to Other Codes …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..….................. III-2
E. Relationship to the California Environmental Quality Act ………………………………………………………………………...………..…………...... III-3
1. Cultural and Historic Resources …………………………………………………………………………………………….….………………… III-3
F. Relationship to Other Regulations ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………........ III-5
G. Non-Conforming Uses and Structures ……………………………………………………………………………………………..………..…………...... III-5
H. Temecula Historic Preservation District ………………………………………………………………………………………….….................................. III-6
1. Purpose and Intent ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…......................... III-6
2. Historical Background ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…........................ III-6
3. Establishment of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District …………………………………………………………..…....................... III-6
4. Temecula Local Historic Register ………………………………………………………………………………………………..………………. III-6
I. Old Town Local Review Board ………………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………….III-11
1. Powers and Duties of the Old Town Local Review Board ………………………………………………………………………......................... III-11
2. Project Types and Old Town Local Review Board Review Requirements ………………………………………………….…………………... III-12
a. Level One Projects ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………... III-12
b. Level Two Projects ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………….. III-12
3. Finding of Historic Appropriateness …………………………………………………………………………………………….……………...... III-13
a. Findings to Approve or Deny a Finding of Historic Appropriateness Application …………………………………………………….. III-14
J. Building Permits and Prohibitions ………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………….... III-15
K. Maintenance and Care …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………..…………... III-15
L. Additional Provisions for Historic Structures …………………………………………….………………………………………..................................… III-15
M. Approval Authority …………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………….………….... III-15
N. Temporary Use Permits…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................. III-17
1. Purpose and Intent……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…. III-17
2. Permitted Uses……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. III-17
a. Major Temporary Use Permit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-17
b. Minor Temporary Use Permit…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-17
3. Authority………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. III-18
4. Findings………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... III-18
5. Conditions of Approval………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…. III-18
6. Revocation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… III-18
O. General Provisions and Regulations ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………… III-19
1. Effect of the Specific Plan ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……......................... III-19
2. Minimum Requirements of the Specific Plan ……………………………………………………………………………….……………...……. III-19
3. Severability ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. III-19
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-2
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this chapter is to outline the procedures
for processing land use permits, development permits
and other discretionary land use approvals in the Old
Town Specific Plan Area. This chapter identifies the
regulatory framework for the administration of the
Specific Plan and describes the relationship between the
Old Town Specific Plan and the City of Temecula
General Plan, Municipal Code, Development Code, and
planning laws including the California Environmental
Quality Act and Subdivision Map Act, as well as other
applicable codes and regulations.
Additionally, this chapter introduces and defines the
established Temecula Historic Preservation District and
identifies the location of the historic structures within
the Old Town Specific Plan boundaries. This chapter
also identifies the specific administrative procedures for
the processing, review, and approval of discretionary
land use permits for historic sites, structures and
buildings, including the Finding of Historic
Appropriateness.
A discussion of the establishment and authority of the
Old Town Local Review Board is also included in this
chapter, which defines the review process for the
OTLRB and discusses the project types that require the
review and recommendation of the Old Town Local
Review Board prior to project approval at the staff level
(administrative), at Director’s Hearing, Planning
Commission and/or City Council.
B. AUTHORITY FOR THE PLAN
California Government Code Sections 65450 through
65457 provides the necessary authorization for the City
of Temecula to prepare and adopt this Specific Plan.
The Old Town Specific Plan is a regulatory plan which
will serve as zoning law for properties within the
boundaries of the Specific Plan as depicted in Exhibit I-
1 in Chapter I. All proposed development plans or
agreements, tract or parcel maps, and any other
development approvals or Conditional Use Permits
must be consistent with this Specific Plan and with the
General Plan, (including the identification of the Old
Town area as a Village Center by the General Plan),
Development Code, Municipal Code and planning law,
including the California Environmental Quality Act.
The Specific Plan may be amended to further the
systematic implementation of the General Plan.
C. RELATIONSHIP TO THE GENERAL PLAN
The Old Town Specific Plan is intended to implement
the goals and policies of the General Plan, promote the
health, safety and welfare of the public, attain the
physical, social and economic advantages of orderly
land use and resource planning, provide development
standards and design guidelines resulting in the most
compatible land uses and well-designed buildings,
structures and land development, and facilitate adequate
provisions for infrastructure and public facilities.
A proposed use is considered to be consistent with the
General Plan when the following conditions exist:
1. The proposed use is allowed in the General Plan
Land Use Designation in which the use is located, as
shown on the Land Use Map, or is described in the text
of the General Plan.
2. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals,
policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the
General Plan.
3. The proposed use is established and maintained in a
manner which is consistent with the General Plan and
all applicable provisions contained therein.
D. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CODES
The Old Town Specific Plan development procedures,
regulations, standards, and specifications shall
supersede the relevant provisions of the Development
Code (Chapter 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code) as
they currently exist or may be amended in the future.
The provisions of the Development Code shall apply
when they do not conflict, undermine, or counteract the
provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan. Where there
is a conflict between the regulations of the Old Town
Specific Plan and the regulations of the Development
Code, the regulations provided herein shall prevail.
Where regulation is not provided in this Specific Plan,
the provisions of the Development Code shall prevail.
This provision shall not be used to permit uses,
architectural styles, site design, procedures or design
guidelines not specifically authorized or encouraged by
this Specific Plan or the Development Code.
Additionally, the City of Temecula shall administer the
Old Town Specific Plan in accordance with the State of
California Government Code, Subdivision Map Act and
Local Subdivision Ordinance.
Nothing in this Specific Plan shall be interpreted to
authorize the use of a lot, parcel or building in any way
that is in violation of any other applicable statute,
ordinance, or regulation. Examples of other regulations
or ordinances include, but are not limited to:
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-3
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
• Adult Business Ordinance
• Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance
• Smoking Ordinance
• Massage Ordinance
• Noise Ordinance
When provisions of various adopted regulations are
different than that of this Specific Plan, the regulations
of this Specific Plan shall apply. To the extent required
by law, the rights given by any permit, license or any
other approval under any ordinance repealed by this
Specific Plan may be continued; however, in the event
of changes or modifications of an approved project,
development plan or permit, the modified project must
be consistent with this Specific Plan.
E. RELATIONSHIP TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
All projects are subject to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
shall be reviewed in accordance with the provisions of
this Specific Plan, the California Environmental Quality
Act and guidelines, and the City’s guidelines for
CEQA.
1. Cultural and Historical Resources
Numerous laws and regulations, including CEQA,
require federal, state, and local agencies to consider the
effects a project may have on cultural and historic
resources. New development in Old Town has the
potential to disrupt undiscovered archeological and/or
paleontological resources during project construction
and may directly or indirectly impact sites of cultural or
historical importance. Previously unknown or
unrecorded archeological resources may exist anywhere
within the Old Town Specific Plan area, and may be
unearthed during excavation and grading activities for
individual projects. As such the following shall be
required in order to avoid destroying any cultural or
historical resources:
a. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-
39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which requires that all areas slated for
development or other ground-disturbing activities shall
be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1-mile radius
records search and intensive archaeological survey) for
archaeological resources on a project-specific basis
prior to the City’s approval of project plans. The survey
shall be carried out by a qualified archaeologist in
consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño
Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe
shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist
on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the
opportunity to comment on the archaeological report
which results from the evaluation. If archaeological
resources are encountered during the survey, the City
shall require that the resources are evaluated for their
eligibility for listing on the National Register or
California Register by a Riverside County qualified
archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that
recommendations are made for treatment of these
resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If
Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended,
the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test
plans and participate with the project archeologist
during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with
recommendations shall be completed prior to project
approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if
feasible. Ground-disturbing activity in areas which were
previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a
qualified archaeologist in consultation with the
Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources
shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified
archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s).
b. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-
39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which states that during construction, should
prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be
discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall
stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in
consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted
to assess the significance of the find according to
CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is
determined to be significant, the City and the
archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the
Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or
other appropriate mitigation. All cultural materials
recovered will be, as necessary and in consultation with
the Pechanga Tribe, subject to scientific analysis, and
documentation according to current professional
standards. Sacred and ceremonial items shall not be
subject to any scientific analysis. Upon completion of
earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish
ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred
items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that
are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for
proper treatment and disposition.
c. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-
39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which states that for projects in areas which were
previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a
qualified archaeologist in consultation with the
Pechanga Tribe (pursuant to Section III.E.1.a) to be
sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to
seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall
contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of
grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to
coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to
develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment
and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall
address the treatment of known cultural resources;
appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent
discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and
participation of Native American Tribal monitors
during grading, excavation and ground disturbing
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-4
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
activities; project grading and development scheduling;
terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment
and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred
sites, and human remains discovered on the site.
d. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-
39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which states that if inadvertent discoveries of
subsurface cultural resources are discovered during
grading, the Project Applicant, the Project
Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the
significance of such resources and shall meet and confer
regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the
project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree
on the significance or the mitigation for such resources,
these issues will be presented to the Planning Director
for decision. The Planning Director shall make the
determination based on the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act with respect to
archaeological resources and shall take into account the
religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the
Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights
available under the law, the decision of the Planning
Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula
City Council.
e. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-
39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which states all sacred sites, should they be
encountered within the project area, shall be avoided
and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible.
f. Consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan
Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS-2, the
Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy
which states that all areas slated for development or
other ground-disturbing activities in the Specific Plan
Area which contain structures 50 years old or older be
surveyed and evaluated for their potential historic
significance prior to the City’s approval of project
plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified
historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary
of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural History. If
potentially significant resources are encountered during
the survey, demolition or substantial alteration of such
resources identified shall be avoided. If avoidance of
identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the
City shall prepare a treatment plan to include, but not
limited to, photo-documentation and public
interpretation of the resource.
g. Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the
City of Temecula’s General Plan Goal 6 and
Implementation Procedure OS-26 and OS-39, the
Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy
which states that if human skeletal remains are
uncovered during project construction, work in the
vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County
coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the
County coroner determines that the remains are Native
American, he or she will contact the Native American
Heritage Commission (NAHC), in accordance with
Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c),
and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by
AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s)
thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the
deceased Native American, who will then help
determine what course of action should be taken in
dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code
5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate
vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or
archaeological standards or practices, where the Native
American human remains are located, is not damaged
or disturbed by further development activity until the
landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in
this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely
descendents regarding their recommendations, if
applicable, taking into account the possibility of
multiple human remains.
Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner
shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to
generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards
or practices, where the Native American human remains
are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further
development activity until the landowner has discussed
and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC
5097.98), with the most likely descendents regarding
their recommendations, if applicable, taking into
account the possibility of multiple human remains.
h. The Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new
policy which states that in the event that paleontological
resources are discovered, the project proponent will
notify a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist
will document the discovery as needed, evaluate the
potential resource, and assess the significance of the
find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines
Section 15064.5. If fossil or fossil bearing deposits are
discovered during construction, excavations within
50 feet of the find will be temporarily halted or diverted
until the discovery is examined by a qualified
paleontologist (in accordance with Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of
Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995)). The paleontologist
will notify the appropriate agencies to determine
procedures that would be followed before construction
is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the
City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the
paleontologist will prepare an excavation plan for
mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that
make the resource important. The plan will be
submitted to the City for review and approval prior to
implementation.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-5
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
F. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER REGULATIONS
All construction and development within the Old Town
Specific Plan area shall comply with the applicable
provisions of the California Building Code and with the
various related mechanical, electrical, and plumbing
codes, and with the Fire Code. In case a conflict arises
between the provisions of the building and fire codes
and this Specific Plan, the building and fire codes shall
prevail.
G. NON- CONFORMING USES AND
STRUCTURES
Where, at the time of passage of this Specific Plan, a
lawful use of land or structure exists which would not
be permitted by the regulations imposed by this Specific
Plan, such use or structure may be continued
indefinitely unless one of the following occurs:
• If the non-conforming use vacates the property
and the non-conforming use is not re-
established within one year, the use shall not
be re-established.
• If the non-conforming use voluntarily vacates
the property for any reason after the year 2013,
then the non-conforming use shall not be re-
established.
• If more than 50% of the non-conforming
structure is damaged or destroyed, the
structure shall not be re-established.
• If more than 25%, but less than 50% of the
non-conforming structure is damaged or
destroyed, the structure may be replaced if the
exterior of the repaired structure substantially
conforms to the approved urban architectural
standards and design guidelines contained
Chapter IV and Chapter V of this Specific
Plan.
• Existing detached single-family residences in
the Neighborhood Residential (NR) District
and Residential/Limited Mixed Use (R/LMU)
are not subject to the requirements above and
may be expanded subject to the approval of the
Director of Planning.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-6
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
H. TEMECULA HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DISTRICT
1. Purpose and Intent
This section is intended to provide information
regarding the establishment of the Temecula Local
Historic Preservation District and the administrative
process for the review and approval of discretionary
land use permits for historic structures, historic
buildings and/or historic sites. This section also
includes a discussion of the two project levels and
outlines the corresponding review and approval process.
Additionally, this section discusses the authority and
purview of the Old Town Local Review Board
(OTLRB), which is the advisory review board that
provides input to all major development projects and
projects involving a historic structure in Old Town. The
administrative framework for the review and approval
of projects in Old Town, as well as the input from the
Old Town Local Review Board, ensure that all
development projects in Old Town are consistent with
the historical context of the area.
2. Historical Background
Old Town’s rich historical heritage and colorful past is
still apparent in the area today. Several of the buildings
in the Old Town area are designated historic structures
and are reminiscent of the time period and traditions of
the 1800s to 1940s. Protecting the historical and
architectural resources found in Old Town and
elsewhere in the City will ensure that Temecula’s
legacy and historic past will be preserved for the
enjoyment of future generations. Old Town as we know
it today has been cultivated from a rich local history.
This acknowledgement is essential to the appreciation
of the City’s origin and expectations for the future.
The preservation of Temecula’s historical resources is
part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old
Town. In order to accomplish this goal, the Old Town
Specific Plan provides relief from modern codes and
requirements for designated historic buildings and
structures within Old Town. The Specific Plan also
provides relief for historic structures located outside of
Old Town. These eligible historic buildings and
structures are given relief from the contemporary
municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws that are
normally applied to newer structures.
3. Establishment of the Temecula Local Historic
Preservation District
The boundary of the Temecula Local Historic
Preservation District shall be coterminous with the
boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition,
the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall
also include the following historic structures located
outside of the Old Town Specific Plan area: Vail Ranch
Headquarters, Vail Ranch House, Wolf Tomb,
Gonzalez Adobe, Alec Escallier House and Barn, and
Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse.
4. Temecula Local Historic Register
The City Council has identified a number of historic
buildings and structures in Temecula. These buildings
and structures are officially designated on the Local
Historic Register for the City of Temecula and are
shown on the Historic Structures Map Exhibit III-1. All
buildings on this list are eligible to receive any and all
benefits authorized by the State of California for
designated historic structures. The use of the Historic
Building Code is also specifically authorized for all
historic structures officially designated on the Local
Historic Register.
The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures
in Old Town is provided in Table H-1. The list of
Designated Historic Buildings and Structures outside of
Old Town is provided in Table H-2. The Historic
Structures located outside of Old Town are shown on
the Historic Buildings and Structures Located Outside
of Old Town Map Exhibit III-2. All dates for the
historic structures are approximate and are based upon
the best available information.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-7
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Table III-1: Historic Buildings and Structures in Old Town
Historic Structure Name Approximate Date Location
Saint Catherine's Church 1920 28314 Mercedes Street
Welty Building 1897 28657 Old Town Front Street
Machado Store 1910 28656 Old Town Front Street
Clogstone 1932 28676 Old Town Front Street
First National Bank 1914 28645 Old Town Front Street
Palomar Hotel 1915 28522 Old Town Front Street
Burnham Store 1902 42051 Main Street
Friedeman Meat Market 1901 42050 Main Street
Welty Hotel 1891 42100 Main Street
Unnamed residence 1928 42251 6th Street
Bill Friedeman House 1922 42291 6th Street
Nienke House 1936 28575 Pujol Street
McConville House Early 1890s 28585 Pujol Street
Albert Nienke House Early 1920s 28649 Pujol Street
G.A. Burnham House Early 1880s 28653 Pujol Street
Al Otto House 1882 28717 Pujol Street
Table III-2: Historic Buildings and Structures Outside of Old Town
Historic Structure Name Approximate Date Location
Alec Escallier House and Barn 1927-1928 28870 Pujol Street
Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex 1906 32115, 32117, 32119, 32121,
32123, 32125, 32127 Temecula
Parkway
Vail Ranch House 1921 31658 Via San Carlos
Wolf Tomb 1887 45334 Maguey Court
Gonzoles Adobe 1879 27645 Jefferson Avenue
Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse 1889 28871 Santiago Road
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-8
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The following historic structures in Old Town
Temecula have been moved from their original
location:
• Saint Catherine’s Church building (Historic
Building “A” shown on Exhibit III-1) was
relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in
1992.
• The Bill Freideman House (Historic Building
“L” shown on Exhibit III-1) was relocated on
the same site in 2003 as part of housing project
sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency.
• The Alec Escallier House and Barn (Historic
Building shown on Exhibit III-2) was relocated
from Main Street to Pujol Street in 2008 as
part of the development of the Civic Center
site.
Additions and removals of structures on the Historic
Structures Map shall be at the direction of the Planning
Commission upon meeting all requirements for said
removal or addition, pursuant to the requirements of
this chapter.
Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific
Plan, a number of previously designated historic
structures in Old Town Temecula were determined to
be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe. It was
determined that these historic structures could not be
rehabilitated. Table H-3 lists the designated historic
structures that were demolished since the Specific
Plan’s initial adoption in 1994. This listing has been
provided for historical documentation purposes only.
Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse
Table III-3:
Historic Buildings and Structures Demolished Since the Adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan
Historic Structure Name Approximate Date Location Date Removed
Harry Walters House 1930s 28535 Pujol Street 1996
Unnamed Residence 1920 28735 Pujol Street 1999
Knott’s Garage 1910 28545 Old Town
Front Street
2000
Angel Ramirez House 1926 28731 Pujol Street 2002
Fred Ramirez House 1920 28725 Pujol Street 2002
J.D. Welty House 1926 42081 3rd Street 2008
Mercedes/Pujol Schoolhouse
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-9
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-10
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-11
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
I. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD
The Old Town Local Review Board is the advisory
board for the Temecula Local Historic Preservation
District. The Old Town Local Review Board provides
input into all major development projects proposed in
Old Town, or projects involving a historic site, building
or structure within (and outside) the Old Town Specific
Plan area.
The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed
of five members. Board members shall be appointed by
the City Council for terms of three years. The member
terms shall be staggered so that all the members of the
Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the
same time. All members shall exhibit an interest in, and
knowledge of, the history and architecture of Temecula.
It is preferred that at least one member shall be
knowledgeable in architectural and construction
techniques. Members shall serve without pay.
The Old Town Local Review Board shall hold regular
public meetings and establish such rules as may be
appropriate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its
business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At
its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall
elect a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson who will
facilitate the meetings when the Chairperson is absent.
At his or her sole discretion the Director of Planning
may provide the Old Town Local Review Board with
information on major projects that are adjacent to Old
Town that have the potential to affect the Old Town
area. The Director of Planning may also provide the Old
Town Local Review Board with information on major
projects that have the potential to affect any historic
structure or site within the Temecula Local Historical
Preservation District.
1. Powers and Duties of the Old Town Local Review
Board
The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the
following powers and duties in addition to those
otherwise provided in this ordinance:
a. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and
comment on all Level II Projects. (See Section III.I.2
for more discussion on project levels in Old Town).
b. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and
approve, or recommend the approval to the appropriate
approving body, for a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness.
c. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and
provide comments on all requests to alter any historic
structure or building.
d. For the review of all development projects in Old
Town, the Old Town Local Review Board shall utilize
the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines
to make determinations of consistency, authenticity and
appropriateness with the historical and architectural
framework that is unique to the Old Town area.
e. For modifications or alterations to historic buildings
or structures, the Old Town Local Review Board shall
use the Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines as a
basis for recommending the approval or denial of an
application for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness to
the appropriate approving body.
f. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness is required to
be made by the Old Town Local Review Board before a
historic building or structure is relocated. The project
shall meet all criteria and requirements outlined in this
chapter before the building can be relocated.
g. For historic structures outside of Old Town
Temecula, the Old Town Local Review Board shall
utilize the best available information related to the
architectural style of the historic structure to maintain
the integrity of existing historic architecture, as well as
preserve its local historic context.
h. The Old Town Local Review Board shall explore
means for the protection, retention, and use of any
historic structures, natural features, sites, and areas in
the district, including but not limited to appropriate
legislation and financing by independent funding
organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal
assistance.
i. The Old Town Local Review Board shall serve as an
advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters
pertaining to the Temecula Local Historic District, and
to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with
individuals, private organizations, and other
governmental agencies concerned with preservation of
the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural
heritage.
j. The Old Town Local Review Board shall render
advice and guidance, upon request of the property
owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration,
alteration, decoration, or maintenance of any structure,
natural feature, site or area within the district.
k. The Old Town Local Review Board shall encourage
public understanding and appreciation of the unique
architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the
district.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-12
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
2. Project Types and Old Town Local Review Board
Review Requirements:
For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the
Old Town Specific Plan and the requirements of the
Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, there are
two specific levels of development projects, based upon
project complexity and potential for aesthetic impacts.
The first level encompasses ministerial or minor
projects, referred to as Level One Projects. The second
category is for non-ministerial and major projects,
called Level Two Projects.
The Director of Planning, at his/her sole discretion, may
forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local
Review Board when unique circumstances exist, or the
sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses
indicate the potential for a significant aesthetic impact.
a. Level One Projects
Level One Projects do not require the review and
recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board.
Level One projects may be approved by administrative
(staff level) review. Typical examples of Level One
Projects include, but are not limited to, the following:
i. Interior alterations to historic structures. (Also
requires a Finding of Historic Appropriateness. See
Section III.I.3).
ii. Re-landscaping around an existing historic building
or structure.
iii. Re-roofing of an existing building or structure.
iv. Additions and remodels to non-historic single family
residences.
v. Exterior architectural modifications to an existing
non-historic commercial, office, residential, or mixed-
use building effecting less than 25% of the front or
street side exterior façade.
vi. The demolition of non-historic buildings and
structures.
vii. New individual signs that conform to the sign
standards contained within Section IV.J of this Specific
Plan.
viii. Any project that is minor in scope as determined by
the Director of Planning.
b. Level Two Projects
Level two projects have the potential for significant
aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always
require review by the Old Town Local Review Board
prior to action by the approving authority. Additionally,
no development application for Level Two projects in
Old Town, as described below, may be approved
without a recommendation from the Old Town Local
Review Board.
Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but
are not limited to, the following:
i. New multi-family residential projects.
ii. New commercial and office projects.
iii. New mixed-use projects.
iv. Exterior architectural modifications to an existing
non-historic commercial, office, residential, or mixed-
use building when 25% or more of an exterior facade is
affected.
v. Any substantial exterior alteration or modification to
a designated historic structure that may impact the
historical building form, detailing, materials and
architectural features (including paint colors) that are
important in defining the historic character of the
building or structure. (Also requires a Finding of
Historic Appropriateness. See Section III.I.3).
vi. The demolition of a designated historic structure.
(Also requires Planning Commission approval and the
approval of a Finding of Historic Appropriateness. See
Section III.I.3).
vii. Sign programs.
viii. Removal or addition of a property on the Temecula
Local Historic Register.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-13
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
3. Finding of Historic Appropriateness
The purpose of a Finding of Historic Appropriateness is
for the maintenance, retention, and preservation of the
historical building form, detailing, materials and
architectural features that are important in defining the
historic character of the building or structure. The
following guidelines for a finding of Historic
Appropriateness are intended to provide clear and
consistent guidance for any modification or alteration
proposed to be made to a designated historic structure
or building. The following shall be abided by:
a. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and
provide comments, feedback, direction, and, when
applicable, make a recommendation to the appropriate
hearing body, for all applications for a Finding of
Historic Appropriateness.
b. No existing designated historic building or structure
may be demolished, modified, relocated or altered in
any way, including alternations or modification to the
exterior or interior of the building or structure, without
a Finding of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the
provisions of this chapter.
c. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be made
prior to the issuance of a permit for the alteration,
modification, relocated or demolition of the building or
structure. The Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall
be incorporated into the review and approval process
for the requested change.
d. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness within Old
Town Temecula may be issued administratively (at the
staff level), by the Director of Planning, the Planning
Commission, or City Council as part of the approval
process for any development within the Old Town
Specific Plan. The approval authority for a Finding of
Historic Appropriateness shall be based upon the
approval authority established by the Specific Plan for
the accompanying application as outlined in Table III-4
(Approval Authority) of this Specific Plan.
e. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness for structures
located outside of the Old Town Specific Plan may be
approved administratively at the staff level, by the
Director of Planning, by the Planning Commission, or
by the City Council as part of the approval process and
approval authority as established by the Development
Code.
f. All applications shall be filed in a manner determined
appropriate by the Director of Planning. Requests for a
Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall not be
accepted unless they are accompanied by the
appropriate filing fee and such information and
drawings as may be required by the Director of
Planning. All applications for a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness shall be signed by either the owner of
the property or a person authorized by the owner.
g. All drawings shall be signed by the architect
responsible for the design and must be in sufficient
detail to show the proposed design for the site. This
includes the architectural design and elevations,
including signs, proposed materials, textures and colors
(including material samples), the site layout (including
all improvements affecting appearances), and walls,
walkways, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings,
lights, and other similar elements.
h. Following the receipt of a complete application, the
Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting of the
Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and
provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy
of the site plan and elevations. The Board shall review
the application materials and make a recommendation
to approve or deny the project, and if required a Finding
of Historic Appropriateness, with or without conditions,
to the approval authority designated by this Specific
Plan.
i. The expiration date for a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness shall be the same as the expiration date
for the accompanying planning application.
j. Extensions of Time for a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness shall be allowed pursuant to the
approval of a time extension for the accompanying
development application and/or Conditional Use
Permit.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-14
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
a. Findings to Approve or Deny a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness Application
i. In considering requests for Findings of Historic
Appropriateness, the Old Town Local Review Board
shall make the following findings:
• That the proposed project is in conformance with
the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other
ordinances of the City.
• The project is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare.
• That the proposed project is in conformance with
the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan,
including the goals, objectives and policies, and
architectural guidelines and standards.
ii. In considering requests for the demolition or
relocation of a historic building or structure, the Old
Town Local Review Board shall make the following
findings:
• In the event of the proposed demolition of a
designated historic building or structure, the Board
shall also be required to find that the applicant has
submitted substantial evidence that the structure is
imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the
structure cannot be effectively repaired or
retrofitted.
• In the event of a proposed relocation of a
designated historic structure, the Board shall be
required to find that the relocation of the building is
compatible with the surrounding land uses,
properties and businesses, and that the site in which
the building is proposed to be relocated can
adequately meet all required development
standards of this Specific Plan.
iii. In considering the request for the removal or
addition of structures to the Temecula Local Historic
Register, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make
the following findings:
• That the proposed structure is associated with
events that have made a significant contribution to
the broad patterns of Temecula’s historic and
cultural heritage.
• That the structure is associated with the lives of
persons important in Temecula’s past.
• That the structure embodies the distinctive
characteristics of a type, period, region, or method
of construction, or represents the work of an
important individual, or possesses high artistic
value.
• That the structure yielded, or may be likely to yield
information in prehistory or history of Temecula.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-15
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
J. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROHIBITIONS
In order to ensure the preservation of designated
historic structures listed on the Temecula Local Historic
Register (located in Old Town and elsewhere in the
City), the Old Town Specific Plan outlines a number of
requirements applicable only to designated historic
structures as follows:
1. Within the boundaries of the Temecula Local
Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish,
remove, relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or
cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be
constructed, or modify any designated historic building
or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans
approved in conjunction with a Finding of Historic
Appropriateness. (See Section III.I.3).
2. Within the boundaries of the Temecula Local
Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall
be issued for the modification, alteration or relocation
of a designated historic structure unless a Finding of
Historic Appropriateness is made.
3. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness must be made
in compliance with the provisions of this chapter prior
to the issuance of a building permit for the designated
historic structure.
4. Interior changes to historic buildings and structures
that do not affect the exterior of the building require a
building permit. Prior to the issuance of a building
permit for interior changes to a historic structure, a
Finding of Historic Appropriateness is required.
5. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to
exempt any person from complying with any other
provision of law.
K. MAINTENANCE AND CARE
1. The owner, occupant, or other person responsible for
the maintenance and/or care of a designated historic
building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic
Register shall keep the building in good repair. All
necessary maintenance to prevent deterioration and
decay of any interior portion of the building and
exterior architectural feature shall be completed.
2. Nothing in the requirements of this section shall be
construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance, care or
repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any
designated historic building or structure that does not
involve a change in design, material, or external
appearance thereof.
L. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC
STRUCTURES
In addition to the general violation provisions in this
chapter, any person or owner who demolishes, alters or
removes a building or structure on the Temecula Local
Historic Register, shall be required to restore the
building, site, or structure to its original condition and
setting within ninety days of the violation. For the
purpose of this section, the demolition shall be
presumed to have occurred on the date the City has
actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall
have the burden of providing an earlier date, if
entitlement to an earlier date is claimed.
1. If any person demolishes or removes a building or
structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register in
violation of this section, no land entitlement, building or
construction related permits, including grading permits,
land use permits or entitlements to utilize the property
as a parking area, or develop any other commercial,
residential or mixed-use project on the site, shall be
issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City
Council's discretion, based on the significance of the
resource from the date of demolition. Exceptions may
be made to these restrictions in order to replicate the
lost resource.
2. The failure to adequately maintain a designated
historic building or structure can also be considered to
constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or
structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register.
3. Any action to enforce this provision may be brought
by the City or any other interested party. This civil
remedy shall be in addition to any criminal prosecution
and penalty, and any other remedy provided by law.
M. APPROVAL AUTHORITY
The purpose of this section is to outline procedures for
the processing of all land use permits and other
discretionary approvals in the Old Town Specific Plan
area. Table III-4 (Approval Authority) identifies the
approval authority for various planning, zoning and
land use permits issued by the City as well as the
requirements for projects to be considered at the Old
Town Local Review Board. For a project that requires
more than one permit or approval, the approving body
for the entire project shall be the highest level of
approval required for any portion of the application.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-16
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
TABLE III-4: APPROVAL AUTHORITY
Application Type OTLRB Review Administrative
Approval
Director of
Planning Approval
Planning Commission
Approval
City Council
Approval
Development Plan – 10,000 s.f. and under X2 X6
Development Plan – over 10,000 s.f. X2 X
Major Modification X2 X3,6 X3 X3
Minor Modification8 X1 X6
Minor Conditional Use Permit – existing
building
X4,6
Conditional Use Permit X5,6 X5
Finding of Historic Appropriateness X2, 7 X6,7 X6,7 X7 X7
Temporary Use Permit9 X6
Footnotes:
1.) Considered a Level One Project which does not require the review and approval of the OTLRB. However, the Planning Director may forward a Level One Project to the OTLRB if
the project has the potential to have significant aesthetic impacts or special significance.
2.) Considered a Level Two Project which requires review and recommendation by the OTLRB before the project can be approved by the appropriate approving authority.
3.) Major Modifications may be approved administratively if the project was originally approved by the Director of Planning. Projects which were approved by the Planning
Commission or City Council must be considered by the original approving body. Increases in building square footage that results in a building larger than 10,000 square feet shall be
heard by the Planning Commission.
4.) Minor Conditional Use Permits, which are for conditionally permit uses to be conducted within an existing building, may be approved by the Director of Planning at a noticed public
hearing.
5.) A Conditional Use Permit with a Development Plan shall be approved by the hearing body required for the Development Plan.
6.) For matters that are considered to have unique circumstances, special significance or aesthetic impacts, the Director of Planning may refer such matters to the Planning Commission.
7.) All applications for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be reviewed by the OTLRB. A Finding of Historic Appropriateness may be issued either administratively, by the
Director of Planning, by the Planning Commission, or by the City Council as part of the approval process for any Minor Modification, Major Modification, or Development Plan. The
appropriate approval authority shall be based upon the approval authority for the application type.
8.) Outdoor Dining or Sidewalk Cafes require the approval of a Minor Modification if not approved as a part of the original Development Plan.
9.) Temporary Use Permits are limited to one permit per business per quarter for each calendar year.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-17
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
N. TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
1. Purpose and Intent
The provisions of this chapter shall govern special
events and temporary uses on private commercial
property in Old Town. Special events on public
property in Old Town shall be governed by Chapter
12.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Parades and
Special Events on Public Property.
The temporary use permit allows for short-term
activities or events that may be appropriate within the
Old Town Specific Plan area when regulated.
Temporary uses shall not exceed ninety days when not
occupying a structure, (including promotional
activities), or one year for all other uses occupying a
structure, or for a shorter period of time as determined
by the Director of Planning. Residential model home
complexes are exempt from the time limitations.
2. Permitted Uses
Temporary uses in Old Town are divided into two
general categories: major and minor. Major temporary
uses have a potential to create health and safety
problems, can occur on undeveloped property and/or
outdoors, may create traffic and noise problems, and/or
could potentially disrupt community life or surrounding
businesses and residents. Minor temporary uses occur
on developed commercial private property and/or
indoors, and for very short time periods. Minor
temporary uses produce little noise and/or traffic, and
have no significant impacts on adjacent properties.
Temporary Use Permits are limited to one permit per
business per quarter for each calendar year.
a. Major Temporary Uses
The following major temporary uses may be permitted,
subject to the review and approval a Major Temporary
Use Permit:
i. Fairs, festivals, concerts, outdoor live entertainment,
and similar activities when not held within a facility
designed to accommodate such an event or use such as
auditoriums, stadiums, or other public assembly
facilities. Major Temporary Use Permits issued for the
uses described above are subject to the following
requirements:
• The number of Major Temporary Use Permits
issued for fairs, festivals, concerts, outdoor
live entertainment, and similar activities in Old
Town may not exceed one per business for
every quarter for each calendar year. Fairs,
festivals, concerts, outdoor live entertainment,
and similar activities shall not exceed two
consecutive days in length.
• Major Temporary Use Permits issued for City
Sponsored Signature Events and/or special
events where the City is the applicant are not
subject to the quarterly limit.
• Major Temporary Uses for fairs, festivals,
concerts, outdoor live entertainment, and
similar activities shall not be permitted in the
Neighborhood Residential (NR) zoning
district.
ii. Real estate offices and model homes within approved
development projects.
iii. On and off-site contractors’ construction yards in
conjunction with an approved active development
project.
iv. Christmas tree sales lots. Such activity shall be only
held from November 1st through December 31st.
v. Pumpkin sales lots.
b. Minor Temporary Uses
The following minor temporary uses may be permitted,
subject to the review and approval of a Minor
Temporary Use Permit.
i. Outdoor display and sales of merchandise within the
Downtown Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use
districts that exceed the regulations set forth in Section
17.10.020(K) of the Development Code. Outdoor
display and sales of merchandise permitted with a
Minor Temporary Use Permit shall not exceed sixteen
days per calendar year per business or organization and
are subject to the following requirements:
• Merchandise displayed or sold must be
customarily sold on the premises by a
permanently established business.
• The maximum number of consecutive days for
any one event shall not exceed nine calendar
days.
• Events exceeding five consecutive calendar
days shall be fully enclosed in a tent so as to
minimize any aesthetic impacts.
• Set-up and take-down of tents, lighting,
fencing, merchandise and/or items for the
event shall not be counted towards the
allowable event days per calendar year, except
that set-up shall not exceed one and one-half
days and take-down shall not exceed one and
one-half days unless otherwise authorized by
the planning director.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-18
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
• Any event comprising of a partial day shall
count as one calendar day.
ii. Public health and safety activities, including
emergency clinics and temporary inoculation centers.
iii. Vendor stands (non-mobile).
iv. Veterinary clinics on developed sites that are not in
conjunction with a veterinary facility (i.e., pet store,
groomer).
v. For temporary uses that are not listed in subsections
(B) (1) and (B) (2) of this section, the Director of
Planning may, at his/her sole discretion, determine
whether an unlisted temporary use should be classified
as major, minor or not permitted. This determination
shall be based upon the similarities and differences with
the above listed uses and an assessment of the proposed
temporary use’s compatibility with the zoning district
and surrounding land uses.
3. Authority
A temporary use permit may be approved, conditionally
approved, or denied administratively by the Director of
Planning. The Director of Planning may refer such
initial application to the Planning Commission.
Decisions of the Director of Planning may be appealed
to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the
Development Code.
4. Findings
The Director of Planning may approve, or conditionally
approve a temporary use permit application, only when
the following findings can be made:
a. The proposed temporary use is compatible with the
nature, character and use of the surrounding area.
b. The temporary use will not adversely affect the
adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
c. The nature of the proposed use not detrimental to the
health, safety, or welfare of the community.
5. Conditions of Approval
In approving an application for a temporary use permit,
conditions may be imposed when deemed necessary to
ensure that the permit will be in accordance with the
intent of the Old Town Specific Plan. These conditions
may involve any pertinent factors affecting the
operation of such temporary event, or use, and may
include, but are not limited to:
a. Provision for temporary parking facilities, including
vehicular ingress and egress.
b. Regulation of nuisance factors such as, but not
limited to, prevention of glare or direct illumination on
adjacent properties, noise, vibration, smoke, dust, odors,
gases and heat.
c. Regulation of temporary structures and facilities,
including placement, height and size, location of
equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas and
other yards.
d. Provision for sanitary and medical facilities.
e. Provision for solid, hazardous and toxic waste
collection and disposal.
f. Provision for security and safety measures.
g. Regulation of signage.
h. Regulation of operating hours and days, including
limitation of the duration of the temporary use.
i. Submission of a performance bond or other surety
devices, to ensure that any temporary facilities or
structures used will be removed from the site within a
reasonable time following the event and that the
property will be restored to its former condition.
j. A requirement that the approval of the requested
temporary use permit is contingent upon compliance
with applicable provisions of the municipal code.
k. Any other conditions which will ensure the operation
of the proposed temporary use in an orderly and
efficient manner and in accordance with the intent and
purpose of this section.
6. Revocation
A temporary use permit may be revoked or modified by
the Director of Planning in accordance with the
Development Code.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-19
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
O. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND
REGULATIONS
1. Effect of the Specific Plan
No person shall use any premises except as specifically
permitted by and subject to the regulations of this
Specific Plan. Except as otherwise permitted herein,
whenever this Specific Plan prohibits the use of
property for a particular purpose, those premises and
any improvements on the premises shall not be used for
that purpose, and no structure or improvement shall be
constructed, altered or moved onto the premises which
is designed, arranged, or intended to be occupied or
used for that purpose.
2. Minimum Requirements of the Specific Plan
The provisions of this Specific Plan shall be interpreted
and applied as the minimum requirements for the
promotion of the public health, safety and general
welfare. The Director of Planning shall interpret the
Specific Plan based upon the policy directives of the
City Council.
3. Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or
portion of this Specific Plan, or future amendments or
additions hereto, is for any reason held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by the decision of a court of competent
jurisdiction, such decisions shall not affect the validity
of the remaining portions of this Specific Plan, or future
amendments or additions hereto. The City hereby
declares that it would have adopted these requirements
and each sentence, subsection, clause, phrase, portions
or any future amendments or additions hereto,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections,
subsections, clauses, phrases, portions or any future
amendments or additions hereto may be declared
invalid or unconstitutional.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan III-20
III. ADMINISTRATION AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
(This page is left blank intentionally).
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
CONTENTS:
A.Introduction.…………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-8
1. What is a Form-Based Code?………………….………………………………………………………………………………….......................... IV-8
2. How to Use This Code…………………………………………………………...……………………………………………............................. IV-8
B. Establishment of the Zoning Districts………………….…………………………………..………………………………………………………............. IV-9
1. Zoning District Boundaries…………………….………………………………………………………………………………….……………… IV-9
2. Old Town Zoning Districts…………………….…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-10
a. Downtown Core District (DTC)………………………………………………………………………………………............................ IV-10
b. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District (DTC/HO)…….……………………………………………………………………………….IV-10
c. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use (R/LMU)….…………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-10
d. Neighborhood Residential (NR)..……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-10
e. Civic District (CV)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-10
f. Open Space District (OS)…...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-10
C. Land Use Regulations….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-10
D. Urban Standards..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
1. Purpose and Intent.….…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-13
2. Applicability …………………………………….………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
3. Regulating Plan Criteria ………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………...……….. IV-13
a. Lot Design Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… IV-13
b. Building Placement ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-13
c. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-13
d. Parking Required…………...…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-13
e. Allowable Building Types …………………………………………………………………………………………................................ IV-13
f. Allowable Building Frontages …………………………………………………………………………………………........................... IV-13
g. Allowable Building Height …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-13
h. Allowable Encroachments…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-13
i. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements …………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-13
j. Private Open Space Requirements………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-13
4. Development Requirements by Zone …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-14
a. Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District (DTC and DTC/HO) ……………………………………………..…... IV-14
i. Lot Design Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… IV-14
ii. Building Placement Criteria ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………. IV-15
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-17
iv. Parking Required ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..………. IV-19
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver.............................................................................................................................................. IV-19
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height ……………………………………………………………………………... IV-20
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………….…………….. IV-23
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line ………………………………………………………………………...... IV-27
ix. Allowable Encroachments …………………………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-28
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements …………………………………………………………………………………..... IV-29
IV-1
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements …………………………………………………………………………...…... IV-30
b. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District (R/LMU) ………………………...………………………………………………………… IV-31
i. Lot Design Criteria ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…... IV-31
ii. Building Placement Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………...…… IV-32
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-33
iv. Parking Required ..……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-34
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver …………………………………………………………………………….......................... IV-34
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height …………………………………………………………….......................... IV-35
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-38
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line …………………………………………………………......................... IV-43
ix. Allowable Encroachments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-44
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements ……………………………………………………………….…………………… IV-45
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements ……………………………………………………………….......................... IV-46
c. Neighborhood Residential District (NR) ……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-47
i. Lot Design Criteria ……………………………………………………………………………………………......................... IV-47
ii. Building Placement Criteria …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-48
iii. Allowable Parking Placement ………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-50
iv. Parking Required ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-52
v. Adaptive Re-use Parking Waiver ……………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-52
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height …………………………………………………………….......................... IV-53
vii. Allowable Frontage Types …………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-55
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to Line ………………………………………………………..………………… IV-60
ix. Allowable Encroachments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-61
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements ……………………………………………………………………………………. IV-62
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements ……………………………………………………………………………....... IV-63
d. Civic District (CV) ………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. IV-64
i. Exemption from Standards ……………………………………………………………………………………......................... IV-64
e. Open Space (OS) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….….. IV-65
E. Building Type Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-67
1. Commercial Block ……………………………………………………………………………………………….……....................................... IV-68
a. Commercial Block- Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards……………………………………………………………………….. IV-69
b. Commercial Block- Parking Facilities Standards……………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-69
c. Commercial Block-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-70
d. Commercial Block- Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-70
e. Commercial Block-Landscape Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-71
f. Commercial Block-Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-71
g. Commercial Block- Building Size and Massing Standards……………………………………………………………………………... IV-71
2. Courtyard Building ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….... IV-72
a. Courtyard Building- Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards………………………………………………………………………. IV-73
b. Courtyard Building- Parking Facilities Standards……………………………………………………………………………………… IV-73
IV-2
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Courtyard Building-Utilitarian Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
d. Courtyard Building- Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
e. Courtyard Building-Landscaping Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-74
f. Courtyard Building -Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-75
g. Courtyard Building- Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………………….. IV-75
3. Bungalow Courtyard ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-76
a. Bungalow Courtyard-Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards……………………………………………………………………. IV-77
b. Bungalow Courtyard-Parking Facilities Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-77
c. Bungalow Courtyard-Utilitarian Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-78
d. Bungalow Courtyard-Private Open Space Standards…………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
e. Bungalow Courtyard-Landscaping Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
f. Bungalow Courtyard-Floor Plan Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-78
g. Bungalow Courtyard-Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………………….IV-79
4. Rowhouse ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-80
a. Rowhouse-Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
b. Rowhouse-Parking Facilities Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
c. Rowhouse-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-81
d. Rowhouse-Private Open Space Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-82
e. Rowhouse-Landscaping Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-82
f. Rowhouse-Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-82
g. Rowhouse-Building Size and Massing Standards………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-82
5. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex ……..……………………………………………………………………………………....................................... IV-83
a. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards…………………………………………………………….. IV-84
b. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Parking Facilities Standards…………………………………………………………………………….. IV-84
c. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Utilitarian Standards…………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-84
d. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex-Private Open Space Standards………………………………………………………………………….. IV-85
e. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Landscaping Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-85
f. -Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex- Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-85
g. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex -Building Size and Massing Standards…………………………………………………………………. IV-85
6. Detached House …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...................................... IV-86
a. Detached House -Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards…………………………………………………………………………. IV-87
b. Detached House-Parking Facilities Standards………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-87
c. Detached House-Utilitarian Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-87
d. Detached House-Private Open Space Standards……………………………………………………………………………………… IV-87
e. Detached House-Landscaping Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-88
f. Detached House- Floor Plan Standards………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-88
g. Detached House-Building Size and Massing Standards………………………………………………………………………………… IV-88
F. Building Frontage Standards ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-89
1. Frontage Types……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................................... IV-90
a. Shopfront Frontage …………………………………………………………………………………………........................................... IV-90
IV-3
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Arcade Frontage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-91
c. Gallery Frontage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-92
d. Two-story Gallery Frontage…………………………………………………………………………………….................................... IV-93
e. Forecourt Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-94
f. Residential Stoop Frontage……………………………………………………………………………………………........................... IV-95
g. Residential Porch Frontage……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-96
h. Raised Commercial Porch………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-97
2. General Requirements for Commercial Ground Floor Façades ………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-98
G. Supplemental and Special Use Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-99
1. Sidewalk Cafes/Outdoor Dining Areas …………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-99
b. Sidewalk Café/Outdoor Dining Areas Permitted………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
c. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-99
d. Conduct of Hours and Operation………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-99
e. Suspension or Revocation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-99
2. Vending Carts …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…................................. IV-100
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-100
b. Vendor Permit Required………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-100
c. Vending Cart Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-100
d. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation……………………………………………………………………………………………IV-100
e. Denial, Suspension or Revocation of a Vending Permit………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
3. Mixed-Use Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-101
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-101
b. Limitation and Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-101
i. Noise/Aesthetics………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-101
ii. Odor……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-101
iii. Lighting/Glare………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-102
4. Balconies, Patios and Porches ………………………………………………………………………………………………................................. IV-102
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-102
5. Bed and Breakfast Establishments ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...... IV-102
a. Intent……………………………………………………………………………..……………………………………………………… IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…….. IV-102
c. Supplemental Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...IV-102
6. Full Service Hotels ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-102
a. Intent…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-102
b. Requirements……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-103
7. Loading Facilities ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
8. Parking …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
9. Railroad Turntable Preservation Incentives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-103
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
10. Civic District Land Use and Development Standard s …………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-105
H. Circulation and Streetscape Standards ……………………………………………………………………………………………..................................... VI-107
1. Old Town Sidewalk Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-107
a. Current Sidewalk Conditions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-107
b. Sidewalk Design Standards………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………...IV-107
c. Required Sidewalk Configuration Between the Property Line and Build -to Line……………………………………………………… IV-108
d. Sidewalk Cross Sections………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-109
e. Removal of Wooden Boardwalk……………………………………………………………………………………………………….... IV-110
f. Establishment of the Sidewalk Zones …………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-111
i. Curb Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-111
ii. Street Furnishing Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-112
iii. Pedestrian Zone……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-113
iv. Frontage Zone………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….IV-113
g. Typical Sidewalk Zone Widths………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-114
2. Old Town Street Standards ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-115
a. Typical Street Cross Sections…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-115
b. Moreno Road (north and south loop) Cross Sections…………………………………………………………………………………… IV-115
c. Termination of Third Street and Fifth Street Adjacent to Murrieta Creek ……………………………………………………………… IV-127
3. Traffic Calming Measures………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-130
a. Curb-Bulb-outs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-131
b. Speed Tables and Raised Crosswalk……………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-132
c. Designated/Marked Crosswalks…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-132
d. Roundabouts…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-133
4. Old Town Street Tree Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-134
a. Existing Conditions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-134
b. Required Street Tree Design Standards…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-135
c. Street Tree Placement….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-136
d. Example- Conceptual Street Tree Plan………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-137
e. Tree Grate Specifications………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-137
f. Street Tree Landscape Palette…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….IV-138
5. Old Town Mobility Concept ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-141
a. Street Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-141
i. Roundabout Improvements…………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-141
b. Pedestrian Connections/Pedestrian Bridges……………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-141
c. Transit Stops…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-142
d. Multi-Use Trails…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-142
I. Alley Standards …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-145
1. Public Alley Cross Section and Construction Requirements ……………………………………………………………….................................. IV-146
a. Utilities…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-148
2. Private Residential and Commercial Alleyways ……………………………………………………………………………................................. IV-149
3. Preservation of Existing Alleys in Old Town ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-149
IV-4
IV-5
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
J. Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................. IV-151
1. Objective………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-151
2. Architectural Compatibility……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-151
3. Colors……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-151
4. Materials and Construction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-152
5. Lighting Considerations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-152
6. Applicability………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-153
7. Permit Required…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
8. Sign Program……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
9. Prohibitions……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-153
10. Prohibited Signs in Old Town…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
11. Temporary Banners……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-153
12. Temporary Portable Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-154
13. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-154
14. Sign Lighting……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-155
15. Allowable Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
a. Single Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
b. Double Frontage………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-156
c. Interior Frontage/Courtyard…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-156
d. Rear/Secondary Entry…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-156
16. Allowable Sign Types…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-159
a. Wall Mounted/Painted Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..IV-159
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-159
ii. Illumination…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……… IV-159
iii. Sign Placement……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-159
iv. Ornamental Elements/Design…………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-159
b. Plaque Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-160
c. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-161
d. Blade Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-162
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-162
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-162
iii. Sign Placement/Design……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-162
e. Awning Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-163
i. Illumination…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-163
ii. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-163
iii. Sign Placement/Design……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-163
f. Hanging Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-164
iii. Sign Placement…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…… IV-164
IV-6
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
g. Under Canopy Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-164
i. Maximum Sign Area…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-164
ii. Illumination……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-164
iii. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-164
h. Window Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
i. Illumination ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-165
ii. Sign Placement………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
iii. Maximum Sign Area………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-165
i. Accessory Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-165
i. Directory Signs…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-165
ii. Menu Board……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. IV-166
iii. Directional Signs……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-166
iv. Building Name Signs………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-166
v. Hours of Operations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… IV-167
17. Sign Maintenance……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...… IV-167
K. Public Signage Concept …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………………….. IV-169
1. Old Town Gateway Signs ……………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-169
2. Directory Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................... IV-169
a. Directory Sign Content………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-170
3. Directional Way Finding Signage ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-170
a. Directional Way Finding Sign Content………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-171
4. Special Event/Light Pole Banners ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-172
5. Street Name Signs ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... IV-173
6. Old Town/Downtown Logo Signage …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. IV-173
IV-7
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. INTRODUCTION
1. What is a Form-Based Code?
A form-based code regulates development projects by
providing specific regulations for the physical form of a
building (as opposed to the separation of uses) to foster
predictable built results and an active public realm.
Form-based codes emphasize building form ov er land
use and encourage mixed-use development in an urban
environment. Form-based codes also address the
relationship between the building façade and the public
realm to achieve a pedestrian friendly environment
along the streets, sidewalks and alleys.
Form-based code regulations are provided through what
is known as a Regulating Plan. The regulating plan
provides specific development regulations and
standards presented in both words and diagrams to
designate the appropriate building form, scale, massing
and character of a building relative to the district or
geographic location of a lot or property within the
Specific Plan area. More specifically, the regulating
plan regulates the site planning for buildings. This in
turn defines the streetscape to achieve the human scale
and walkability desired for the Old Town area. As part
of the regulating plan, six zones have been established
with their own distinct development regulations.
2. How to use this Code
A basic explanation of how to use this code is provided
below:
a. Identify the zone for your parcel (See Old Town
Regulating Plan Map Exhibit V-1).
For this example, your property is in the Downtown
Core district.
b. Is the proposed use/project allowed by right in the
zone, or is a Conditional Use Permit and/or
Entertainment License required? (See Land Use
Regulations Section IV.C and Table IV-1 Land Use
Matrix of this chapter).
Check the Land Use Matrix Table IV-1. This table will
identify if the land use is allowed by right, requires a
Conditional Use Permit and/or Entertainment License,
or is not permitted in the zone.
If you would like to construct a new building or modify
an existing building please proceed with the next steps
outlined below: (Please note that the application
processing procedures and approval process for projects
in Old Town are discussed in Chapter III-
Administration).
c. Apply the Urban Standards to your site. (See Section
IV.D of this chapter).
For this example, you would check the Downtown Core
district Development Requirements to identify:
• Allowable building placement
• Allowable building type, frontage type and
building height
• Allowable encroachments
• Allowable parking placement requirements
and number of spaces required
• Landscaping required
d. Apply the architectural standards to your site.
• Select from the allowable building types
defined by zone, (in this case determine what
type of buildings are allowed to be constructed
in the Downtown Core district).
• Select from the allowable frontage types
defined by zone, (in this case determine what
frontage types are allowed to be constructed in
the Downtown Core district).
Based upon this information the basic volume and
geometric building form will be established.
e. Apply Building Type and Frontage Type Standards
and Architectural Style and Design Guidelines (See
Chapter IV.E and IV.F and Chapter V.C.3).
IV-8
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE ZONING
DISTRICTS
The following zones have been established within the
Old Town Specific Plan area:
• Downtown Core District (DTC)
• Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District
(DTC/HO)
• Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District
(R/LMU)
• Neighborhood Residential District (NR)
• Civic District (CV)
• Open Space (OS)
Each zone is identified as a spatial district as shown in
Exhibit IV-1 Old Town Regulating Plan. Each zone
shown in the Old Town Regulating Plan has different
development regulations and standards for the physical
building form and building placement that shall apply
in the Old Town Specific Plan area.
1. Zoning District Boundaries
Where boundaries of the Zoning Districts appear to
follow streets, the boundary shall follow the centerlines
of said streets. Where boundaries appear to follow
existing property lines, they shall follow said property
lines and shall not bisect portions of existing lots of
record which are in effect at the time of adoption of this
Specific Plan. The boundaries of the Open Space
Zoning District along the channel of Murrieta Creek,
however, may bisect adjacent parcels.
IV-9
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Old Town Zoning Districts
a. Downtown Core (DTC)
The Downtown Core district is intended to provide for
uses that support pedestrian oriented and mixed-use
development. The Downtown Core Zoning d istrict is
defined by multi-story urban buildings of up to four
stories (when at least one floor of residential is
provided, or when at least one floor of office (with
parking) is provided). The Downtown Core is intended
to accommodate a variety of land uses that will create a
vibrant public realm. Uses include, but are not limited
to art galleries, museums, restaurants, entertainment-
oriented uses, small scale boutique retailers such as gift,
specialty food, and antique shops and similar retail uses,
offices and service oriented uses. Residential
development at 40 to 70 dwelling units per acre and
mixed-use developments are also anticipated within this
district. Service and office uses are restricted to the
second floor and higher for parcels along Old Town
Front Street and Main Street. Residential uses are
permitted in the Downtown Core Zoning district, but
are also restricted to the second floor and higher for
parcels along Old Town Front Street and Main Street.
All four story buildings in the Downtown Core district
must contain at least one floor restricted to residential
use or one floor of office with on-site parking.
b. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO)
The Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district is intended
to encourage the development of a hotel with
conference facilities, restaurant and other guest
services. The Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district
permits a full service hotel with conference facilities,
restaurant and other guest services, to be constructed at
a greater building height than other buildings (up to
eight stories) in the underlying Downtown Core district.
This will provide adequate visitor accommodations for
Old Town and the surrounding area.
c. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use (R/LMU)
The Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district is intended
to provide for attached residential at 20 to 70 dwelling
units per acre, or mixed-use development to
accommodate a variety of attached housing types with
some opportunities for ground floor retail and restaurant
uses. Office uses are also permitted and may be located
on the first or second floor. When a building in this
zone is proposed to be a fully residential use the
residential units may be located on the first floor. The
construction of a neighborhood market is also
anticipated in this district to support the surrounding
residential uses in this area.
d. Neighborhood Residential (NR)
The Neighborhood Residential district is intended to
provide for attached and detached three-story residential
development at a density of 20 to 35 dwelling units per
acre. Typical housing types include detached single
family, multi-family, duplexes, triplexes,
condominiums, and apartments. Commercial uses
proposed as a part of a live/work project are limited to
the first floor only.
e. Civic District (CV)
The Civic district is intended to provide for public and
quasi-public uses such as parks, City offices, and
government buildings, police/fire stations, senior citizen
centers, community centers and other community
assembly uses, public museums, libraries, public art
displays and similar facilities. Due to the unique nature
of buildings and uses located within the Civic district
strict application of the development standards do not
apply.
f. Open Space District (OS)
The Open Space district includes both public and
private areas of permanent open space along the
floodways of Murrieta Creek. The Open Space district
is intended to provide for the preservation of biological
and cultural resources, and to protect the public from
flood hazards. The future Murrieta Creek Restoration
Project and Trail is anticipated to be located within the
Open Space district. No other development will occur
in this zone.
C. LAND USE REGULATIONS
The land uses in the Old Town Specific Plan area are
regulated by district in order to achieve the mixed-use
character envisioned for the area.
Each zone establishes the land uses that are permitted,
conditionally permitted or not permitted in the zone.
Table IV-1, Land Use Matrix, outlines the allowable
land uses by zone. The land use regulations, combined
with the regulating plan for each zone, are intended to
implement the goals, policies and objectives of this
Specific Plan and accomplish the vision for Old Town.
If a land use is not listed in the land use matrix a land
use determination shall be made by the Planning
Commission.
The Civic district (CV) is exempt from the development
standards and not included in the land use matrix. The
Open Space (OS) zone is not included in the land use
matrix because there will be no development within this
district expect for what is constructed as part of the
Murrieta Creek Trail project.
IV-10
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
TABLE IV-1: LAND USE MATRIX
LIST OF USES
Residential-Limited Mixed-Use
(R/LMU)
Downtown Core (DTC)/ Downtown
Core-Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO)
Neighborhood Residential
(NR)
Adult Entertainment Businesses - - -
Alcoholic Beverage Sales C11 C11 -
Art Studio with or without a gallery P1 P1 -
Bar, Cocktail Lounge C1 C -
Beer Tasting Establishment C13 C13 -
Bed and Breakfast C - C
Community Care Facility (6 or Fewer) - - P
Community Care Facility (7 to 14) - - C
Day Care/Preschool C1 C2 -
Day Spa - (Full Service) P1 P -
Drive-thru Businesses (includes eating establishments and banks) - - -
Entertainment See Municipal Code5, 14 See Municipal Code5, 14 -
Escape Rooms C C -
Farmers Market C C -
Health and fitness, dance, martial arts studio P1 P2 -
Home Occupation P P P
Cigar/Hookah Club (private membership only) C C -
Hotel P3 P4 -
Massage Facilities - - -
Museum - P -
Neighborhood market, grocery store P1 P -
Office-Administrative/Professional/Medical P12 P2 -
Performing Arts - P -
Personal Services P1 P2 -
Residential - Attached P P6 P
Residential - Detached - - P
Residential – Live/Work C C C
Restaurant without Alcohol P9 P9 -
Restaurant with Beer and Wine P9 P9 -
Restaurant with Beer, Wine, and Distilled Spirits C C -
Restaurant with Entertainment (not including dancing) See Municipal Code5, 14 See Municipal Code5, 14 -
Restaurant with Entertainment and/or Dancing See Municipal Code5, 14 See Municipal Code5, 14 -
IV-11
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Retail P1 P -
Tattoo Studio - - -
Trade/Educational Institution P1 P2 -
Wine Producing/Micro Brewery – (Type 02 ABC License only) P7 P7 -
Wine Tasting Facility – (Type 02 ABC License only) P8 P8 -
Wine Tasting Facility C10 C10 -
Except hotel operations, business activities within the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use and Neighborhood Residential during the hours of 12:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. shall
require a Conditional Use Permit.
Any use not explicitly stated above shall require a use determination by the Planning Commission.
P Use is permitted by right
C Use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit
- Use is not permitted
1. Use is limited to ground floor only.
2. These uses are limited to either the second floo r (or higher) or to locations that do not front upon or open directly onto either Old Town Front Street
or Main Street.
3. This use is limited to locations that front Moreno Road. Full-service hotel uses with food service and conference facilities at heights greater than three stories but
limited to eight stories may be considered under a Conditional Use Permit. Subject to the Supplemental Standards for hotels over 3 stories.
4. Full-service hotel uses with food service and conference facilities in the Downtown Core -Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO) are allowed eight stories. Subject to the
Supplemental Standard and Special Use Standards in Section IV.G of this chapter, for hotels over three stories.
5. Outdoor entertainment is not permitted in Old Town. City sponsored signature events and/or events when the City is the applicant are exempt. Outdoor live
entertainment may be considered for priva te businesses in Old Town with a Temporary Use Permit as appropriately conditioned, limited to one event per quarter
per Section III.N.
6. Ground floor residential not permitted in the Downtown Core area along Old Town Front Street and Main Street.
7. Shall include a store front tasting room. Premises with or without the product sale for off-site consumption is limited to a Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control License Type 02 (Winery/Winegrower).
8. Premises with or without the product sale for off -site consumption is limited to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Type 02
(Winery/Winegrower).
9. Outdoor Dining or Sidewalk Cafes are permitted i n conjunction with a restaurant subject to the review and approval of a Minor Modification or as approved with a
Development Plan application.
10. Premises with or without the product sale for off-site consumption applying for any Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License type other than a Type 02
(Winery/Winegrower).
11. Subject to Chapter 17.10 Supplemental Development Standards of the Development Code.
12. This use is permitted on either the ground floor or second floor.
13. Premises with or without the product sale for off-site consumption is limited to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Type 23 (Small Beer
Manufacturing – Duplicate)
14. Subject to Municipal Code Section 9.10 (Entertainment License)
IV-12
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
D. URBAN STANDARDS
1. Purpose and Intent
This section identifies the development standards and
requirements for all projects within the Old Town
Specific Plan area. The Urban Standards are intended to
ensure that proposed development within the Old Town
area occurs in a manner that is consistent with the
community’s vision for building form, massing,
architectural character, and the building’s relationship
to the street and public realm.
2. Applicability
All proposed improvements, development projects, or
physical modification to any building in Old Town shall
be designed in compliance with the standards of this
chapter for the applicable zoning district, with the
exception of the Civic district (CV). Due to the unique
nature of buildings and uses located within the Civic
district, strict application of the development standards
do not apply. However, these projects will be reviewed
through the Capital Improvement Project process to
ensure compatibility with the surrounding buildings and
structures.
3. Regulating Plan Criteria
Each zone that is identified in the Old Town Regulating
Plan (Exhibit IV-1) has corresponding development
standards to achieve the vision for the Old Town area.
The following Regulating Plan criteria are outlined by
zone in Section IV.4 (Development Requirements by
Zone) of this chapter:
a. Lot Design Criteria–Addresses the minimum lot size
and required lot dimensions by zoning district.
b. Building Placement-Addresses where and to what
extent buildings can be placed on a site.
c. Allowable Parking Placement-Addresses where and
to what extent parking can be placed on a site.
d. Parking Required-Addresses what amount of parking
is required by use and by zone.
e. Allowable Building Types-Addresses which building
types are allowed in which zone in Old Town.
f. Allowable Building Frontages – Addresses which
building frontage types are allowed in which zones
and how much of the building façade is required to
be placed on the build-to line.
g. Allowable Building Height-Addresses how many
stories and the maximum number of feet in height a
building may be, and under what specific conditions
a building’s number of stories may vary.
h. Allowable Encroachments-Addresses where and to
what extent certain components and architectural
elements can extend over the build-to line or into
required setback areas.
i. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements-Addresses
how much landscaping, what type of landscape
treatments, and where landscaping is required within
parking areas by zone.
j. Private Open Space Requirements-Addresses how
much private open space is required for each
residential unit by zone.
IV-12
IV-13
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
4. Development Requirements by Zone
a. Downtown Core District (DTC) and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay District (DTC/HO)
The following requirements shall apply to all property
that is located within the Downtown Core district and
the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district.
i. Lot Design Criteria
The table below identifies the minimum lot size and
dimension criteria for all lots in Old Town tha t are
located within the Downtown Core district and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district.
Table IV-2:
Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay District Lot Design Criteria 1
Minimum Net Lot Area (square feet) 3,500
square feet
Minimum lot width at front property
line
25 linear
feet
Minimum lot depth 140 linear
feet
1 Criteria does not apply to existing legal lots.
Figure IV-1: Examples of typical buildings anticipated
in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay District.
IV-14
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
ii. Building Placement Criteria
Building Placement-Lots without Creek frontage:
The table below identifies the typical building
placement/setbacks on lots within the Downtown Core
and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district.
For the purposes of determining the front of a property
or the primary frontage for building placement in this
zone, properties that have frontage on more than one
street shall consider Old Town Front Street or Mercedes
Street as the front of the lot and meet the criteria
outlined below accordingly.
Table IV-3:
Building Placement in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots
without Murrieta Creek Frontage
Build-to Line/Setbacks:
In-feet:
A. Front Build-to Line
(primary frontage)
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind
the property line on
the build-to line
B. Side Street (secondary
frontage side on corner
lot)
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind
the property line on
the build-to line
C. Side Yard Setback 0 feet
D. Rear Yard Setback (no
alley)
5 feet
E. Alley Rear Yard
Setback
0 feet
Figure IV-2: Typical building placement in the DTC and DTC/HO district for lots without Murrieta Creek frontage.
IV-15
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
Building Placement- Lots with Creek frontage:
The table below identifies the typical building
placement/setbacks for lots adjacent to Murrieta Creek
within the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay district.
Buildings along Murrieta Creek should be designed to
front both the primary street frontage and front Murrieta
Creek. Building facades facing Murrieta Creek are
required to be placed on the secondary build-to line to
achieve uniformity in building placement along the
Murrieta Creek trail.
Projects facing Murrieta Creek shall be designed with
active frontage (useable, leasable area) that faces the
creek channel.
Table IV-4:
Building Placement in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District for Lots
with Murrieta Creek frontage
Build-to Line/Setbacks:
In-feet:
A. Building facade facing
Murrieta Creek
Building façade to be
placed 20 feet behind the
property line on the build-
to line
B. Building façade facing
secondary side street
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind the
property line on the build-
to line
C. Side Yard Setback 0 feet
D. Rear Yard Setback (no
alley)
5 feet
E. Alley Rear Yard
Setback
0 feet
IV-16
Figure IV-3: Typical building placement in the DTC and DRC/HO district for lots with Murrieta Creek frontage.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
iii. Allowable Parking Placement
Parking and loading facilities within the Downtown
Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district shall
be placed on the site in accordance with the following
requirements:
Table IV-5:
Parking Placement in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District (typical lot)
Parking
Facility
Setback
(behind build-
to line):2
Surface parking,
tuck under
parking, alley
loaded parking,
structured garage
parking1, podium
parking:3
Subterranean:
A. Front Yard
Setback
(primary street
frontage
and/or
Murrieta
Creek)
20 feet from the
build-to line along
the primary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended2
0 feet from
property line
B. Side Street
Setback
(secondary
street frontage
on corner lot)
20 feet minimum
from the build-to
line along the
secondary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended2
0 feet from
property line
C. Side Yard
Setback
0 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
D. Rear Yard
Setback (no
alley)
5 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
E. Alley Rear
Yard Setback
0 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
1All parking structure upper stories may be built to the build-to-line.
2Parking setbacks apply to the parking level adjacent to the sidewalk.
3When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent
of the site and screened from the street.
Figure IV-4: Allowable parking placement in the DTC and DTC/HO district for lots without Murrieta Creek
frontage.
IV-17
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
Table IV-6:
Parking Placement in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay District (lots with Murrieta Creek
frontage)
Parking Facility
Setback
(behind build-to
line):1
Surface, tuck under,
alley loaded,
structured garage1
and podium
parking:3
Subterranean:
A. Front Yard
Setback (primary
street frontage
and/or Murrieta
Creek)
20 feet from the
build-to line along
the primary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended2
0 feet from the
build-to line
B. Side Street
Setback
(secondary street
frontage on
corner lot)
20 feet minimum
from the build-to line
along the secondary
street frontage; 50
feet is recommended2
0 feet from the
build-to line
C. Side Yard
Setback
0 feet from property
line
0 feet from
property line
D. Rear Yard
Setback (no
alley)
5 feet from property
line
0 feet from
property line
E. Alley Rear
Yard Setback
0 feet from property
line
0 feet from
property line
1All parking structure upper stories may be built to the build-to-line.
2Parking setbacks apply to the parking level adjacent to the sidewalk.
3When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they
shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street.
IV-18
Figure IV-5: Allowable parking placement in the DTC and DTC/HO district for lots with Murrieta
Creek frontage.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
Parking Area Performance Standards:
• Parking shall not be visible from the street or
from Murrieta Creek.
• Parking setbacks shall be applied to all stories
with the exception of the top deck of parking
structures.
• When parking is provided adjacent to an alley,
access to these parking spaces shall be
provided directly from the alley.
• Where site conditions allow parking shall be
accessed from an alley or from a secondary
street. Direct access from Old Town Front
Street or Main Street is not permitted when
access is available from an alley or from a
secondary street.
• Additional parking design and parking layout
criteria is addressed by Building Type in
Section E of this chapter. Section V.D
(Parking Lot Design Guidelines) shall also be
applicable to all projects constructed in the
Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay district.
Driveway and Access Standards:
• Driveways on adjacent properties shall be
placed as far from one another as possible.
• Driveways shared by two or more projects are
encouraged whenever possible.
• Driveways on the same property shall be
located at least 250 feet apart.
iv. Parking Required
The table below indicates which land uses require
parking and the corresponding parking ratio that is
required in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district:
Table IV-7:
Parking Requirements in Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District
Land Use Parking Required:
Hotel 1 parking space/guest
room or suite (ancillary
conference rooms,
meeting rooms and
ballrooms within the
hotel shall be parked
separately at 1
space/300 SF GFA)
Office Parking shall be
provided as required by
the parking
requirements contained
in Chapter 17.24 of the
Temecula Municipal
Code
Residential 1 parking space per
residential dwelling
unit1
v. Adaptive Re-Use Parking Waiver
In order to preserve existing historic buildings located
within the Old Town Specific Plan area, additional off-
street parking shall not be required for the use or
intensification of the use for designated historic
structures. These designated historic buildings and
structures are identified in the Old Town Historic
Preservation District Ordinance contained in Section
III.H of this Specific Plan.
IV-19
1 All required residential parking spaces that are
provided for a project shall be dedicated
specifically for use by the associated residential
unit/tenant.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Height
The table below outlines the allowable building types
and building heights in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district. Additional
standards related to Building Types are addressed in
Section E of this chapter and shall be applied to all
projects in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district. Sections V.B and V.C of
the Design Guidelines Chapter, also discuss basic
building forms and the architectural character that is
required to reflect the historical context of Old Town
Temecula and shall be applied to all building
constructed in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district. The Design Guidelines
contained in Chapter V shall be used in concert with the
urban standards contained in this chapter.
Table IV-8:
Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the
Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District
Building Type1 Permitted
Not Permitted
Allowable Building
Height
(max. feet/ stories)2,3
Rowhouse X 55 feet maximum height in
4 stories
Courtyard Building X
55 feet maximum height in
3 stories; but up to 50 feet
in four stories allowed
when at least one level is
residential, or when one
level is office and parking
is provided.
Commercial Block X
55 feet maximum height in
3 stories; but up to 50 feet
in four stories when at least
one level is residential, or
when one level is office
and parking is provided.
Detached House
X N/A
Duplex, Tri-plex, Quad-
plex
X
N/A
Bungalow Courtyard
X N/A
1 Building Type and Building Frontage Standards
shall be applied as required in Section E and F of
this chapter.
2 Allowable Building Height in the Hotel Overlay is
eight stories equivalent to no more than 100 feet to
allow by right a full service boutique hotel with
food service and conference facilities.
3 Buildings adjacent to a designated historic
structure that share a street frontage shall not be
constructed more than one story or 25 feet higher
than the historic structure, in the adjacent 25 feet of
frontage.
IV-20
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
a. Typical Three-Story Scenario b. Typical Four-Story Scenario c. Typical Eight-Story Scenario (Hotel)
Figures IV-6a, b, c: Conceptual sketches of
typical allowable building height scenarios in
the Downtown Core and Downtown Core
Hotel Overlay District:
55’ Max 55’ Max
100’ Max
IV-21
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
IV-21 IV-6 d: Conceptual sketch of allowable building height
(typical) in relationship to the finished grade of the sidewalk
when the building facades are located on a slope.
55’
55’ 55’
IV-22
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
vii. Allowable Frontage Types
The table at right outlines the allowable building
frontages in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay district. Buildings facing Murrieta
Creek should be designed to front both the primary
street frontage and front Murrieta Creek. Building
Frontages along the Murrieta Creek shall incorporate
recessed courtyard areas and small semi-public plazas
into the building design to complement the Murrieta
Creek walk, to enhance the street terminations at Third
Street and Fifth Street, and to enhance adjacent open
space areas.
Additional standards for the frontage typ es are
discussed in Section IV.F Building Frontage Standards,
and shall be applied for all projects in the Downtown
Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district.
Additionally, Section V.B.2 of the Design Guidelines
contains criteria for each frontage type. The Design
Guidelines for building frontages shall be used in
concert with the standards in this chapter and shall be
applicable to all projects constructed in the Downtown
Core and the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay district.
The exhibits below show the various frontage ty pes
allowed in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core
Hotel/Overlay district and the allowable frontage types
in relationship to the property line, build-to line and
public realm.
Table IV-9:
Allowable Frontage Types in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District
Frontage Type1 Permitted Not Permitted
Shop Front X
Arcade X
Gallery X
Two-Story Gallery X
Forecourt X
Raised Commercial Porch X
Porch X
Stoop X
1 Buildings that have frontage on more than one street or frontage along Murrieta Creek should be
designed with the allowable building frontage type fronting both the primary street frontage, the
secondary street frontage (where applicable), and Murrieta Creek (where applicable).
IV-23
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
a. Typical Shopfront:
b. Typical Arcade:
IV-24
Figures IV-7 a-e: Conceptual sketches and photos showing
building frontage types allowed in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District:
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
c. Typical Gallery:
d. Typical Two-Story
Gallery:
IV-25
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
e. Typical Forecourt:
IV-26
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to
Line:
Recessed entrances and building articulation can be
incorporated into a building’s design in accordance with
the percentages outlined in the table below. The ground
floor of a building fronting a street within the
Downtown Core district and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay district shall comply with the following for the
building frontage percentage required to be placed on
the build-to line:
Table IV-10:
Required Percentage of Frontage on Build-to Line in
the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay District
Building Type: Percentage of building
frontage required to be
placed on build-to line:
Rowhouse 70%-100% minimum
Courtyard Building 70%-100% minimum
Commercial Block 70%-100% minimum
Figure IV-8: Building façade to lot width ratio in the Downtown Core and Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay District
IV-27
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
ix. Allowable Encroachments
The table below outlines the allowable encroachments
between the build-to line and the property line and into
the side and rear yard setbacks for buildings located in
the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay district.
Table IV-11:
Allowable Encroachments in Downtown Core/Downtown Core Hotel Overlay
District
Building Element: Over the build-
to line (typical
lot or lot with
creek frontage):
Over the build-to
line side street
(corner lot):
Into
Side/Rear
Yard setback
(with or
without
alley):
A. Architectural features
such as cornices, eaves,
overhangs, and other
decorative building elements
5 feet
maximum
5 feet maximum 0 feet
B. Balconies, patios or
terraces (above first floor)
10 feet
maximum
10 feet maximum 0 feet
C. Awning or Canopy 8 feet
maximum
8 feet maximum 0 feet
D. Bay Window 2 feet
maximum
2 feet maximum 0 feet
E. Urban accent landscaping
–potted, or hanging plants,
etc.
3 feet
maximum
3 feet maximum N/A
Table IV-12:
Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Downtown Core and Downtown Core/Hotel
Overlay District
F. Awnings, canopies, and other architectural features
such as building projections, eaves, overhangs, and
other decorative building elements
8 feet minimum
G. Balconies or terraces (above first floor) 12 feet minimum Figure IV-9: Allowable encroachments in the DTC and DTC/HO
IV-28
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
x. Parking Facility Landscaping Requirements
• Minimum three foot landscape planters shall
be maintained along the perimeter of at-grade
parking areas. When a parking lot is fully
screened, architecturally integrated into a
building, within a parking structure, or
underground, three foot wide perimeter
landscaping shall not be required.
• For parking areas that are visible from an
alley, landscape planters shall be placed at the
end of each row of parking. The landscape
planter adjacent to the parking rows shall be at
least three feet in width and the same length as
the adjacent parking stall.
• All development projects in the Downtown
Core and Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay
district shall comply with the approved plant
list in the Appendices of this Specific Plan.
• Additional criteria for landscaping are
discussed according to Building Type in
Section E of this chapter and Section V.E of
the Design Guidelines. Landscape Design
Guidelines shall be applied to all projects
constructed in the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core Hotel Overlay district.
3 feet minimum
Alley
IV-29
Figure IV-10a (above):
Photo of landscape
buffer adjacent to
parking area
10b (below):
Site plan view of parking
lot landscape buffers.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – DOWNTOWN CORE AND DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY DISTRICT
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements
• Private open space areas that do not face or
front upon Murrieta Creek shall be a minimum
of 100 square feet per residential unit.
• A minimum of 75 square feet of private open
space shall be provided for residential units
that face or front upon Murrieta Creek.
• The amount of private open space per unit may
be reduced by no more than 50 percent of the
required area when combined with common
private open space as long as the combined
total of private open space and common
private open space required for the project is
met.
• Outdoor balconies, patios and terraces are
subject to the requirements in the
Supplemental Standards Section IV.G.4 of this
chapter.
IV-30
Figure IV-11: Photo
examples of private
open space.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS –RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
b. Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District (R/LMU)
The following requirements shall apply to all property
that is located within the Residential/Limited Mixed-
Use district.
i. Lot Design Criteria
The table below identifies the minimum dimension
criteria for all lots in Old Town that are located within
the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district:
Table IV-13:
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District Lot
Design Criteria 1
Minimum net lot area (square feet) 3,125
square feet
Minimum lot width at front property
line
25 linear
feet
Minimum lot depth 125 linear
feet
1 Criteria does not apply to existing legal lots
IV-31
Figure IV-12: Photo examples of typical
buildings in the Residential/Limited Mixed-
Use District.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
ii. Building Placement Criteria
Typical Building Placement:
The table below identifies the typical building
placement/setbacks on a lot within the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district. For the purpose
of determining the front of the property or the primary
frontage for building placement in this zone, properties
that have frontage on more than one street shall
consider Mercedes Street and Old Town Front Street as
the front of the lot and meet the criteria outlined below
accordingly.
Buildings constructed within the Moreno Road Loop
and fronting both Old Town Front Street and Moreno
Road should be designed to front both street frontages.
Building façades facing the front property line or
secondary side street frontage are required to be placed
uniformly on the build-to line.
Table IV-14:
Typical Building Placement in the Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use District
Build-to Line/Setbacks: In-feet:
A. Front Build-to Line
(primary frontage)
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind the
property line on the
build-to line
B. Side Street (secondary
frontage side on corner lot)
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind the
property line on the
build-to line
C. Side Yard Setback 0 feet
D. Rear Yard Setback (no
alley)
5 feet
E. Alley Rear Yard Setback 0 feet
Figure IV-13: Typical building placement in the R/LMU district.
IV-32
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
iii. Allowable Parking Placement
Parking and loading facilities within the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district shall be placed
on the site in accordance with the following
requirements:
Table IV-15:
Allowable Parking Placement in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District
Parking
Facility
Setback
(behind build-
to line):2
Surface, tuck
under, alley
loaded, structured
garage1, and
podium parking:3
Subterranean:
A. Front Yard
Setback
(primary street
frontage and/or
Murrieta
Creek)
20 feet from the
build-to line along
the primary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended2
0 feet from
build-to line
B. Side Street
Setback
(secondary
street frontage
on corner lot)
20 feet minimum
from the build-to
line along the
secondary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended2
0 feet from
build-to line
C. Side Yard
Setback
0 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
D. Rear Yard
Setback (no
alley)
5 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
E. Alley Rear
Yard Setback
0 feet from
property line
0 feet from
property line
Figure IV-14: Allowable parking placement in the R/LMU district.
IV-33
1All parking structure upper stories may be built to the build-to-line.
2Parking setbacks apply to the parking level adjacent to the sidewalk.
3When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall
be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
Parking Area Performance Standards:
• Parking shall not be visible from the street.
• Parking setbacks shall be applied to all stories
with the exception of the top deck of a parking
structure.
• Parking and loading is required to be located at
the rear of the lot away from the street.
• On a corner lot, parking and loading facilities
shall be located on the interior rear of the lot
away from both street frontages in order to
screen the parking area from the street.
• Additional criteria for the design and layout of
parking facilities in Old Town are addressed
by Building Type in Section E of this chapter.
Additional criteria are also Section V.D
(Parking Lot Design Guidelines) which shall
be applicable to all projects constructed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
• Parking shall be accessed from the secondary
streets and shall not be accessed from
Mercedes Street or Old Town Front Street
(within the Moreno Road Loop) to the greatest
extent possible.
Driveway and Access Standards:
• Driveways shared by two or more projects is
encouraged whenever possible.
• Driveways on adjacent properties shall be
placed as far from one another as possible.
• Driveways on the same property shall be
shared or be located at least 250 feet apart.
iv. Parking Required
The table below indicates which land uses shall require
parking in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district
and the corresponding parking ratio that is required.
v. Adaptive Re-Use Parking Waiver
In order to preserve existing historic buildings located
within the Old Town Specific Plan area, additional off-
street parking shall not be required for the use or
intensification of the use for designated historic
structures. These designated historic buildings and
structures are identified in the Old Town Historic
Preservation District Ordinance contained in Section
III.H of this Specific Plan.
Table IV-16:
Parking Requirements in the Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use District
Land Use Required Parking
Space Ratio:
Hotel 1 parking space/guest
room or suite (ancillary
conference rooms,
meeting rooms and
ballrooms within the
hotel shall be parked
separately at 1 space/300
SF GFA)
Bed and Breakfast 1 parking space/guest
room
Residential All residential uses shall
provide on-site parking
as required by the
parking requirements
contained in Chapter
17.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.1
Commercial/Retail/Office
Uses
All commercial uses
shall provide on-site
parking as required by
the parking requirements
in Chapter 17.24 of the
Temecula Municipal
Code.
IV-34
1 When more than one parking space per residential unit is
required, tandem parking may be provided to meet the
parking requirements.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Heights
The table at right outlines the allowable building types
and building heights in the Residential/Limited Mixed-
Use district. Additional standards related to building
types are addressed in Section IV.E of this chapter and
shall be applied to all projects in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district. Section V.B
and V.C of the Design Guidelines, also discuss basic
building forms and the character required to reflect the
historical context of Old Town Temecula and shall be
applied to all buildings constructed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district. The Design
Guidelines contained in Chapter V shall be used in
concert with the urban standards contained in this
chapter.
Table IV-17:
Allowable Building Types and Building Height in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District
Building Type1 Permitted
Not Permitted
Allowable Building Height
(max. feet/stories) 2, 3, 4
Rowhouse X 40 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Courtyard Building X
40 feet maximum height in
three stories, or up to three
stories in 50 feet when a
mixed-use building includes at
least one floor of residential or
when one level is office and
parking is provided.
Commercial Block X
40 feet maximum height in
three stories, or up to three
stories in 50 feet when a
mixed-use building includes at
least one floor of residential or
when one level is office and
parking is provided.
Bungalow Courtyard X 40 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Duplex, Triplex, Quad-
plex X 40 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Detached House X N/A
1 Building Type Standards shall be applied as required in Section E
of this Chapter.
2 Buildings adjacent to a designated historic structure that share a
street frontage shall not be constructed more than one story or 25 feet
higher than the historic structure in the adjacent 25 feet of frontage.
3 Roof pitches shall not be counted toward the maximum height limit
for the zone.
4 Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides
criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be
utilized for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing
architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add
roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the
building consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is
not intended to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line
of the building nor to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or
more stories.
IV-35
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
a. Typical Three-Story Scenario b. Typical Mixed-Use Three-Story Scenario
(When at least one floor is residential or office).
Figure IV-15 a,b: Conceptual sketches of typical allowable building height scenarios in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
IV-36
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
IV-37
Figure IV-15 c: Conceptual sketch of allowable
building height (typical mixed-use building with
at least one floor residential) in relationship to
the finished grade of the sidewalk when the
building facades are located on a slope.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
vii. Allowable Frontage Types
The table at right outlines the allowable building types
in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
Buildings that have frontage on more than one street
should be designed with the allowable building frontage
type fronting both the primary street frontage and
secondary street frontage.
Additional standards for the frontage types are
discussed in Section IV.F Building Frontage Standards
in this chapter, and shall be applied for all projects in
the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
Additionally, Section V.B and V.C of the Design
Guidelines contain criteria for each frontage type. The
Design Guideline for building frontages shall be
applicable to all projects constructed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
Table IV-18:
Allowable Frontage Types in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District
Frontage Type1 Permitted Not Permitted
Shop Front X
Arcade X
Gallery X
Two-Story Gallery X
Forecourt X
Stoop X
Porch X
1 Buildings that have frontage on more than one street or frontage along Murrieta Creek should be
designed with the allowable building frontage type fronting both the primary street frontage and the
secondary street frontage (where applicable).
IV-38
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
Figures IV-16 a-g: Conceptual sketches and photos
showing building frontage types allowed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district.
a. Typical Shopfront:
b. Typical Arcade:
IV-39
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
c. Typical Gallery:
d. Typical Two-Story
Gallery:
IV-40
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
e. Typical
Forecourt:
f. Typical Stoop:
IV-41
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
g. Typical Porch:
IV-42
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to
Line
Recessed entrances and building articulation can be
incorporated into a building’s design in accordance with
the percentages outlined in the table below.
The ground floor of a building fronting a street within
the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district shall
comply with the following for the building frontage
percentage required to be placed on the build-to line:
Table IV-19:
Required Percentage of Building Frontage on
the Build-to Line in the Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use District
Building Type: Percentage of Frontage
required to be on build-to
line:
Rowhouse 70%-100% minimum
Courtyard
Building
70%-100% minimum
Commercial
Block
70%-100% minimum
Bungalow
Courtyard
70%-100% minimum
Duplex, Triplex,
Quadplex
70%-100% minimum
Figure IV-17: Building façade to lot width ratio in the R/LMU district.
IV-43
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
ix. Allowable Encroachments
Table IV-20 outlines the allowable architectural
encroachments over the build-to line and into the side
and rear yard setbacks for buildings located in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district. Table IV-21
outlines the minimum vertical clearance.
Table IV-20:
Allowable Encroachments in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use
District
Building Element: Over the
build-to line
(typical lot):
Over the build-
to line side
street (corner
lot):
Into
Side/Rear
Yard
setback
(with or
without
alley):
A. Architectural
features such as
building projections,
eaves, overhangs, and
other decorative
building elements
5 feet
maximum
5 feet
maximum
0 feet
B. Balconies, patios or
terraces (above first
floor)
10 feet
maximum
10 feet
maximum
0 feet
C. Awning or Canopy 8 feet
maximum
8 feet
maximum
0 feet
D. Bay Window 2 feet
maximum
2 feet
maximum
0 feet
E. Urban accent
landscaping –potted, or
hanging plants, etc.
3 feet
maximum
3 feet
maximum
N/A
F. Stoop and/or Porch
(stairs only)
10 feet 10 feet N/A
Table IV-21:
Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use
District
G. Awnings, canopies, and other
architectural features such as building
projections, eaves, overhangs, and other
decorative building elements
8 feet minimum
H. Balconies or terraces (above first floor) 12 feet minimum
Figure IV-18: Allowable encroachments in the R/LMU district.
IV-44
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements
• Minimum three-foot landscape planters shall
be maintained along the perimeter of at-grade
parking areas. When a parking lot is fully
screened, architecturally integrated into a
building, within a parking structure, or
underground, three-foot-wide perimeter
landscaping shall not be required.
• For parking areas that are visible from an
alley, landscape planters shall be placed at the
end of each row of parking. The landscape
planter adjacent to the parking rows shall be at
least three feet in width and the same length as
the adjacent parking stall.
• All development projects in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use district shall
comply with the approved plant list in the
appendices of this Specific Plan.
• Additional criteria for landscaping are
discussed according to Building Type in
Section E of this chapter and in Section V. E
of the Design Guidelines. The Design
Guidelines shall be applied to all projects
constructed in the Residential/Limited Mixed-
Use district.
3-feet minimum
IV-45
Figure IV-19a (above): Photo of
landscape buffer adjacent to
parking stall.
19b (below): Site plan view of
parking lot landscape buffers.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – RESIDENTIAL/LIMITED MIXED-USE DISTRICT
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements
• All projects constructed in the
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District that
include residential units shall provide a
minimum 75 square feet of private open space
per residential unit.
• The amount of private open space per unit may
be reduced by up to 50 percent of the required
area when combined with common private
open space as long as the combined total of
private open space and common open space
required for the project is met.
• Outdoor balconies, patios and terraces are
subject to the requirements in the
Supplemental Standards Section IV.G.4 of this
chapter.
IV-46
Figure IV-20: Photo
examples of private
open space
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS –NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
c. Neighborhood Residential District (NR)
The following requirements shall apply to all property
located within the Neighborhood Residential District.
i. Lot Design Criteria
The table below identifies the minimum lot dimension
criteria for all lots in Old Town that are located within
the Neighborhood Residential District.
Table IV-22:
Neighborhood Residential District Lot
Design Criteria 1
Minimum Lot Area 3,750 square
feet
Minimum lot width at front
property line
50 feet
Minimum lot depth 75 feet
1 Criteria does not apply to existing legal lots.
IV-47
Figures IV-21:
Photo examples of typical buildings anticipated in
the Neighborhood Residential District
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ii. Building Placement Criteria
Building Placement - (lots without creek frontage):
The table below identifies the typical building
placement on lots without Murrieta Creek frontage
within the Neighborhood Residential District.
For the purpose of determining the front of the property
or the primary frontage for building placement in this
zone, properties that have frontage on more than one
street shall consider Pujol Street as the primary
frontage. Building façades facing the primary street
and/or secondary side street are required to be placed
uniformly on the build-to line.
Table IV-23:
Building Placement in the Neighborhood
Residential District for Lots without Murrieta
Creek Frontage
Build-to Line/Setbacks:
In-feet:
A. Front Build-to Line
(primary street)
Building façade
placed 10 feet behind
the property line on
the build-to line
B. Side Street Build-to Line
(secondary frontage side on
corner lot)
Building façade
placed 10 feet behind
the property line on
the build-to line
C. Side Yard Setback 5 feet from property
line
D. Rear (no alley) 10 feet from property
line
IV-48
Figure IV-22: Typical building placement in the NR district for lots without Murrieta Creek frontage.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Building Placement - (lots with creek frontage):
The table below identifies the typical building
placement for lots with frontage along Murrieta Creek
within the Neighborhood Residential District.
Buildings in the Neighborhood Residential District that
have creek frontage shall be designed to front the
primary street frontage, secondary street frontage
(where applicable) and front Murrieta Creek. Building
facades facing Murrieta Creek are required to be placed
on the build-to line in order to achieve uniformity in
building placement along the creek trail edge and street
edge. All projects with Murrieta Creek frontage shall be
designed with active frontage (leasable, useable area)
facing the creek channel.
Table IV-24:
Building Placement in the Neighborhood Residential
District for Lots with Murrieta Creek frontage
Build-to Line/Setbacks:
In-feet:
A. Building facade along
primary street frontage
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind the
property line on the build-
to line
B. Building façade on
secondary street frontage
Building façade to be
placed 10 feet behind the
property line on the build-
to line
C. Building façade facing
Murrieta Creek
Building façade to be
placed 15-20 feet behind
the property line on the
build-to line
D. Side Yard Setback 5 feet from property line
Figure IV-23: Typical building placement in the NR district for lots with Murrieta Creek frontage.
IV-49
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
iii. Allowable Parking Placement
Parking and loading facilities within the Neighborhood
Residential District shall be placed on the site in
accordance with the following requirements:
Table IV-25:
Parking Placement in the Neighborhood Residential
District for Lots without Murrieta Creek Frontage
Parking
Facility
Setback
(behind the
build-to
line):1
Surface, tuck
under, alley
loaded, garage,
and podium
parking:2,3
Subterranean:
A. Front Yard
Setback
(primary street
frontage
and/or
Murrieta
Creek)
20 feet from the
build-to line along
the primary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended1
0 feet from
property line
B. Side Street
Setback
(secondary
street frontage
on corner lot)
20 feet minimum
from the build-to
line along the
secondary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended1
0 feet from
property line
C. Side Yard
Setback
5 feet 0 feet from
property line
D. Rear Yard
Setback (no
alley)
3 feet (to
accommodate
required perimeter
landscape buffer)
0 feet from
property line
IV-50
Figure IV-24: Allowable parking placement in the NR district for lots without Murrieta Creek frontage.
1 Parking setbacks applies to all stories of the building
2 When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of
the site and screened from the street.
3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street, however podium level
parking does not count as a story for the purposes of determining the maximum number of stories for a building.
Buildings with podium parking shall still comply with the maximum height limit for the zone.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
iii. Allowable Parking Placement (cont).
Parking and loading facilities within the Neighborhood
Residential District shall be placed on the site in
accordance with the following requirements:
Table IV-26:
Parking Placement in the Neighborhood Residential
District for Lots with Murrieta Creek Frontage
Parking
Facility
Setback
(behind the
build-to
line):1
Surface, tuck
under, alley
loaded, garage,
and podium
parking:2,3
Subterranean:
A. Front Yard
Setback
(primary street
frontage
and/or
Murrieta
Creek)
20 feet from the
build-to line along
the primary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended1
0 feet from
property line
B. Side Street
Setback
(secondary
street frontage
on corner lot)
20 feet minimum
from the build-to
line along the
secondary street
frontage; 50 feet is
recommended1
0 feet from
property line
C. Side Yard
Setback
5 feet 0 feet from
property line
Figure IV-25: Allowable parking placement in the NR district for lots with Murrieta Creek frontage.
1 Parking setbacks applies to all stories of the building.
2When individual detached garages are provided for any building type they shall be located at the rear 25 percent of the site and screened from the street.
3 Podium level parking must meet the required parking setback and may not front the street, however podium level parking does not count as a story for the purposes
of determining the maximum number of stories for a building. Buildings with podium parking shall still comply with the maximum height limit for the zone.
IV-51
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Parking Area Performance Standards -
• Parking shall not be visible from the street or
Murrieta Creek.
• Parking and loading is required to be located at
the rear of the lot, away from the street.
• On a corner lot, parking and loading facilities
shall be located on the interior rear of the lot
away from both street frontages in order to
screen the parking area from the street.
• Access to parking shall be taken from
secondary streets, not off of Pujol Street, when
possible.
• Additional criteria for the design and layout of
parking facilities in Old Town are contained in
Section IV.E of this chapter and in Section
V.D of the Design Guidelines Chapter, which
shall be applicable to all projects constructed
in the Neighborhood Residential District.
Pujol Driveway Access Standards -
Due to the character of development anticipated along
Pujol Street the following driveway access standards
shall be required:
• Driveways on adjacent properties shall be
placed as far apart from one another as
possible.
• Only one driveway per Pujol Street frontage
shall be allowed (except emergency access) on
lots with under 200 feet of street frontage
along Pujol.
• Driveways on the same property shall be
located at least 250 feet apart.
• Curb cuts for vehicular access taken from
Pujol Street should be minimized to the
greatest extent possible by utilizing shared
driveways or through the creation of private
alleys.
iv. Parking Required
The table below indicates which land uses shall require
parking in the Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District
and the corresponding parking ratio that is required.
v. Adaptive Re-Use Parking Waiver
In order to preserve existing historic buildings located
within the Old Town Specific Plan area, additional off-
street parking shall not be required for the use or
intensification of the use for designated historic
structures. These designated historic buildings and
structures are identified in the Old Town Historic
Preservation District Ordinance contained in Section
III.H of this Specific Plan.
Table IV-27:
Parking Requirements in the Neighborhood
Residential District
Land Use Required parking space
ratio:
Bed and Breakfast 1 parking space/guest
room
Residential All residential uses shall
provide on-site parking as
required by the parking
requirements contained in
Chapter 17.24 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.1
IV-52
1 When more than one parking space per residential
unit is required, tandem parking may be provided to
meet the parking requirements.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
vi. Allowable Building Types and Building Heights
Table IV-28 below outlines the allowable frontage
types and building heights in the Neighborhood
Residential District. Additional standards related to
building types are addressed in Section IV-E of this
chapter and shall be applied to all projects in the
Neighborhood Residential District. The Design
Guidelines contained in Chapter V Sections B and C
also discuss basic building forms and the character
required to reflect the historical context of Old Town
Temecula and shall be applied to all buildings
constructed in the Neighborhood Residential District.
The Design Guidelines contained in Chapter V shall be
used in concert with the urban standards contained in
this.
Table IV-28:
Allowable Building Types and Building Heights in the Neighborhood Residential District
Building Type1 Permitted
Not Permitted
Allowable Building Height
(max. feet/stories) 2, 3, 4
Rowhouse X 50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Courtyard Building X 50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Bungalow Courtyard X 50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Duplex, Triplex,
Quadplex X 50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Detached House X 50 feet maximum height in
three stories.
Commercial Block X N/A
1 Building Type Standards shall be applied as required in Section E of
this chapter.
2 Buildings adjacent to a designated historic structure that share a street
frontage shall not be constructed more than one story or 25 feet higher
than the historic structure in the adjacent 25 feet of frontage.
3 Roof pitches shall not be counted toward the maximum height limit for
the zone.
4 Section 17.03.060 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which provides
criteria for Minor Exceptions to development regulations, may be utilized
for building height in Old Town for the purpose of providing
architectural elements to a portion (or portions) of a building to add
roofline variation or to otherwise enhance the aesthetics of the building
consistent with its architectural style. A Minor Exception is not intended
to be utilized to add overall height to the base roof line of the building
nor to add extra floor to ceiling height of any one or more stories.
IV-53
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
Typical Three-Story Building
IV-54
Figure IV-26: Conceptual sketch of
allowable building height scenario
in the Neighborhood Residential
district.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
vii. Allowable Frontage Types
Table IV-29 outlines the allowable frontage types in the
Neighborhood Residential District. Additional
standards for the frontage types are discussed in Section
IV.F Building Frontage Standards in this chapter, and
shall be applied for all projects in the Neighborhood
Residential District. Additionally, Section V.B and V.C
of the Design Guidelines Chapter contain additional
design considerations for each frontage type. The
Design Guideline for building frontages and
architectural design shall be applicable to all projects
constructed in the Neighborhood Residential District.
Table IV- 29:
Allowable Frontages Types in the Neighborhood Residential District
Frontage Type 1 Permitted Not Permitted
Porch X
Arcade X
Gallery X
Two-Story Gallery X
Forecourt X
Stoop X
Shopfront X
1 Buildings that have frontage on more than one street or frontage along Murrieta Creek shall be
designed with the allowable building frontage type fronting both the primary street frontage and
secondary street frontage (where applicable), and Murrieta Creek (where applicable).
IV-55
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
a. Typical
Porch:
b. Typical
Arcade:
IV-56
Figures IV-27 a-f: Conceptual sketches and
photos showing building frontage types allowed in
the Neighborhood Residential District.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
c. Typical Gallery:
d. Typical Two-
Story
Gallery:
IV-57
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
e. Typical Forecourt:
f. Typical Stoop:
IV-58
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
IV-59
IV-27 g: Conceptual sketch of allowable building height
(typical) in relationship to the finished grade of the sidewalk
when the building facades are located on a slope.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
viii. Building Frontage Required on the Build-to
Line
Recessed entries and building articulation can be
incorporated into a building’s design in accordance with
the percentages outlined in the table below.
The ground floor of a building fronting a primary street,
secondary street, or Murrieta Creek within the
Neighborhood Residential District shall comply with
the following for frontage types and building frontage
percentage required to be placed on the build-to line.
Table IV-30:
Required Percentage of Building Frontage on
the Build-to Line in the Neighborhood
Residential District
Frontage Types
Allowed:
Percentage of Frontage
required to be placed on
build-to line:
Rowhouse 80%-100% minimum
Courtyard Building
80%-100% minimum
Bungalow
Courtyard
75%-100% minimum
Duplex, Triplex,
Quadplex
75%-100% minimum
Detached House 30%- 100% minimum
Figures IV-28: Building façade to lot width ratios in the NR District
IV-60
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ix. Allowable Encroachments
Table IV-31 below outlines the allowable architectural
encroachments that are allowed between the build-to
line and the property line and into the side and rear yard
setbacks for buildings located in the Neighborhood
Residential District.
Table IV- 31:
Allowable Encroachments in Neighborhood Residential District
Building Element: Over the build-to
line (typical lot or
lot with creek
frontage):
Over the
build-to line
side street
(corner lot)
Side/Rear
Yard (with
or without
alley)
A. Architectural
features such as
cornices, eaves,
overhangs, other
decorative building
elements above the
first floor
10 feet 10 feet 3 feet
B. Balconies, patios
and terraces (above
first floor)
10 feet 10 feet 5 feet
C. Bay Window 2 feet 2 feet 2 feet
D. Accent
Landscape
Treatments on the
first floor
3 feet 3 feet 5 feet
E. At grade or
raised landscape
planters
3 feet 3 feet 5 feet
F. Porch (stairs
only)
10 feet 10 feet N/A
G. Stoop (stairs
only)
10 feet 10 feet N/A
IV-61
Table IV-32:
Minimum Vertical Clearance in the Neighborhood Residential
District
H. Awnings, canopies, and other
architectural features such as building
projections, eaves, overhangs, and other
decorative building elements
8 feet minimum
I. Balconies or terraces (above first floor) 12 feet minimum
Figure IV-29a: Allowable encroachments
over the build-to line or side/rear setback in
the NR District
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
x. Parking Facility Landscape Requirements
• For multi-family development a minimum
three foot landscape planter shall be
maintained along the perimeter of at-grade
parking areas. When a parking area is fully
architecturally integrated and if the parking
area cannot be seen from the public right of
way or public open space area perimeter
landscaping shall not be required.
• For multi-family development three foot
landscape planters shall be placed at the end of
each row of parking. The landscape planter
shall be at least three feet in width and the
same length as the parking stall.
• When a detached garage is used in conjunction
with any building type there shall be a
minimum three foot wide perimeter landscape
planter on all sides of the garage (except where
the access driveway is placed).
• All development projects in the Neighborhood
Residential District shall comply with the
approved plant list in the appendices of this
Specific Plan.
• An additional criterion for landscaping is
discussed in Section V.F of the Design
Guidelines. Landscape Design Guidelines shall
be applied to all projects constructed in the
Neighborhood Residential District.
Figures IV-30: Site plan view of required landscape buffers within parking areas
IV-62
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
xi. Minimum Private Open Space Requirements
• All residential development projects
constructed in the Neighborhood Residential
District shall provide a minimum 100 square
feet of private open space per residential unit.
• Private open space areas such as (but not
limited to) patios and balconies that front upon
Murrieta Creek may be reduced to 75 square
feet minimum per unit.
• The amount of private open space per unit may
be reduced up to 50 percent when combined
with common private open space as long as the
combined total of private open space and
common open space required for the project is
met.
Figures IV-31: Photo example of private open space area
IV-63
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – CIVIC DISTRICT
d. Civic District (CV)
i. Exemption from Standards
This district is intended to accommodate a wide variety
of civic uses. Due to the unique nature of buildings and
uses anticipated within this district, development
characteristics may vary according to their public
purpose as programmed by the City of Temecula and as
dictated by Capital Improvement Project (CIP)
requirements and funding. Therefore, development
standards are not codified by this Specific Plan for
projects within the Civic District (CV). However,
projects in the Civic District should still comply with
the Circulation and Streetscape Standards contained in
Chapter IV. H.
IV-64
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS –OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
e. Open Space (OS)
The Open Space District includes both public and
private areas of permanent open space along the
Murrieta Creek channel. This district will allow for
passive recreational activities and will include the
construction of the Murrieta Creek Restoration Project
and Trail. No commercial buildings or structures shall
be constructed in this district. Therefore, no
development standards are codified by this Specific
Plan for the Open Space District (OS).
IV-65
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(This page is left blank intentionally).
IV-66
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
E. BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS
This section identifies the six building types allowed
within the Old Town Specific Plan area. Each building
type is subject to the Urban Standards and requirements
for each zoning district as outlined in Section IV.D,
“Urban Standards.” The building types allowed in the
Old Town area as follows, and are organized and
discussed in more detail in the following section:
• Commercial Block
• Courtyard Building
• Bungalow Courtyard
• Rowhouse
• Duplex, Triplex, or Quadplex
• Detached House
Design standards are provided herein for each building
type. The design standards address the following for
each building type allowed in the Old Town Specific
Plan area:
• Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Standards
• Parking Facilities Standards
• Utilitarian Standards
• Private Open Space Standards
• Landscape Standards
• Floor Plan Standards
• Building Size and Massing Standards
IV-67
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. Commercial Block
The Commercial Block building type is intended to
accommodate mixed-use and/or commercial development.
Commercial Block buildings may also be designed as a
“liner to conceal a parking garage.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by zoning
district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Commercial
Block
Building
Y Y N
Figures IV-32b, c, & d: Illustrative sketches of typical Commercial Block building type.
IV-68
Figures IV-32 a: Photo example of a
Commercial Block building type.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Commercial Block-Pedestrian and Vehicular
Access Standards:
i. Pedestrian access to the main entrance to each
storefront shall be from the street.
ii. The pedestrian entrance to residential portions of the
building or additional commercial suites (upper floors)
shall be accessed through a street level lobby,
architecturally integrated entry corridor, from an
adjacent alley, or from an internal parking area.
iii. Vehicular access shall be provided through the alley
when present.
iv. For lots without an alley, vehicular access shall be
provided from the secondary street (if a secondary street
exists).
v. For lots without a secondary street frontage and
without alley access, vehicular access may be permitted
from the primary street frontage if no other option is
feasible. In this case, reciprocal or shared access is
encouraged to decrease the number of driveways taking
access from the primary street frontage.
b. Commercial Block-Parking Facilities Standards:
i. Parking shall be accommodated in an internal or
underground garage, in an architecturally integrated
parking lot, a surface parking lot that is screened by the
building, tuck under parking configuration, podium
parking configuration, or any combination of the above
mentioned. All parking facilities shall meet the required
setbacks by zone as outlined in the Urban Standards,
Section IV.D.
ii. Parking shall not be visible from the street.
iii. Parking entrances that impact the aesthetics of any
building façade facing the street shall be architecturally
integrated into the building façade.
Figures IV-33a,b, &c: Illustrative sketched examples of acceptable pedestrian and vehicular
access for a typical Commercial Block building type.
IV-69
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Commercial Block-Utilitarian Standards:
i. When an alley exists, utilitarian items (including, but
not limited to utilities, trash pick-up areas, and above
ground equipment) shall be located adjacent to the alley
behind the property line. For lots without an alley,
utilitarian items shall be located in a side or rear yard.
ii. Utilitarian items may also be located within parking
areas, inside the building within a mechanical/utility
room, or within a building “notch out” when
appropriate.
iii. Service and utilities shall be designed in accordance
with the Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines in
Section V.K and with the Alley Design Guidelines in
Section V.J.
d. Commercial Block-Private Open Space
Standards:
i. Private outdoor patios, balconies or terraces shall face
the primary street frontage, secondary street frontage
and/or Murrieta Creek. They may also be located
internal to the building, face rear property lines or face
the side yard when allowed by building and fire codes.
ii. Balconies, patios or terraces above the first floor
shall meet the encroachment requirements for the zone.
iii. The minimum private open space requirement for
each residential unit shall be according to the Urban
Standards required for each zone.
iv. Residential dwelling units shall have at least two
sides of the façade exposed to outside light and air.
v. Each residential unit shall have at least one door
leading to an outdoor yard, patio, terrace or balcony.
Figures IV-34 a,b,c & d: The photos above show
examples of services, utilities, trash and
equipment appropriately integrated into the
building and/or parking lot design.
IV-70
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. Commercial Block-Landscape Standards:
i. City street trees are the dominant landscape feature
along the primary and secondary street frontage.
Limited urban accent landscaping such as, but not
limited to, potted or hanging plants may be used to
accent the building façade, however trees shall not be
permitted to be planted along the primary or secondary
street frontage on private property to avoid a conflict
with City street trees.
ii. All portions of private property not covered by
building area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped.
iii. All yard areas that are required to be landscaped
shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, groundcover and
flowering perennials. Trees may be planted as space
permits, dependent upon the setbacks for the zone.
iv. Built-in at-grade or raised landscape planters are not
permitted between the property line and build-to line
(along the primary and secondary street).
v. Limited accent landscaping (as defined in the
glossary) is permitted between the property line and the
build- to line but shall not encroach more than three feet
over the build-to line.
vi. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E of the
Design Guidelines.
vii. The plant palette shall be consistent with the
approved Old Town Specific Plan Plant List contained
in the appendices of this Specific Plan.
f. Commercial Block-Floor Plan Standards:
i. Leasable commercial space within the building on the
first floor shall be oriented toward the street and/or
Murrieta Creek.
ii. Service and utility rooms within the building shall be
oriented toward the side or rear of a site.
iii. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Commercial Block building type shall be in compliance
with the zone.
g. Commercial Block-Building Size and Massing
Standards:
i. Commercial Block buildings located on corner lots
shall be designed with two facades of equal
architectural expression.
ii. Commercial block buildings may be permitted to be
composed of one dominant volume but should meet the
design guideline criteria for architectural expression and
variation in the building facade.
iii. Dwelling units located on the top floor are
encouraged to be stepped back on all facades facing the
street to achieve variation in the wall plane and to
accommodate open air patios, balconies or terraces.
IV-71
IV-68
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Courtyard Building
The Courtyard Building type is characterized by the
configuration of a group of business suites and/or
residential dwelling units that are arranged to share one
or more common courtyards. The shared courtyard
space or spaces are intended to be semi-public space
that is an extension of the public realm.
Figure IV-35: Illustrative sketch of Courtyard Building
type.
Figure IV-36: Photo examples of Courtyard Building
type.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by zoning
district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Courtyard
Building
Y Y Y
IV-72
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Courtyard Building-Pedestrian and Vehicular
Access Standards:
i. The main entrance to each ground floor storefont or
residential unit shall be directly from the street. The
street frontage of this building type is intended to serve
as the primary entrance to the interior courtyard.
ii. Entrances for units without street frontage (e.g. units
facing the internal courtyard) or units that opt for a
secondary entrance may be from the courtyard or from
the alley (where they occur).
iii. If multiple courtyards exist they shall be connected
to one another and connected to the public right-of-way
by a paseo or zaguan.
iv. Entrances to the residential portion of the building or
additional commercial suites located in the upper floors
shall be accessed through a street level lobby, through a
courtyard, from an alley, or from an internal parking
area.
v. Vehicular access shall be provided from an alley
(when present).
vi. For lots without an alley, vehicular access shall be
provided from the secondary street.
vii. For lots without a secondary street frontage and
without alley access, vehicular access may be permitted
from the primary street frontage if no other option is
feasible. In this case, reciprocal or shared access is
encouraged.
b. Courtyard Building-Parking Facilities Standards:
i. Parking shall be accommodated in an internal or
subterranean parking garage, in an architecturally
integrated parking lot, surface parking lot that is
completely screened by the building, tuck under parking
configuration, or podium parking configuration, or any
combination of the above mentioned.
ii. The entrances to the parking facilities shall be
located as close as possible to the rear or side yards of
each lot. All parking facilities shall meet the required
setbacks outlined in Section IV.D, Urban Standards.
Parking shall not be visible from the street.
iii. The parking entrances that impact the aesthetic
quality of any building façade facing the street shall be
architecturally integrated into the building façade.
Figure IV-37: Illustrative conceptual sketch of acceptable pedestrian and vehicular access for typical Courtyard Building type.
IV-73
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Courtyard Building-Utilitarian Standards:
i. When an alley exists, utilitarian items (including, but
not limited to utilities, trash pick-up areas, and above
ground equipment) shall be located adjacent to the alley
behind the property line. For lots without an alley,
utilitarian items shall be located in a side or rear yard,
or within the internal courtyard when appropriate.
ii. Utilitarian items may also be located within parking
areas, inside the building within a mechanical/utility
room, or within a building “notch out” when
appropriate.
iii. When above ground utility or service equipment is
located within the courtyard they shall be grouped
together and screened with landscaping.
iv. Service and utilities shall be designed in accordance
with the Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines in
Section V.K and with the Alley Design Guidelines in
Section V.J.
d. Courtyard Building-Private Open Space
Standards:
i. The primary shared open space for the Courtyard
Building type is the internal courtyard area or areas.
This space or combined spaces (when multiple
courtyards exist) shall be equal to at least 15 percent of
the total net lot area.
ii. Courtyards are permitted to be located on the ground
floor or on a podium.
iii. Private outdoor patios, balconies or terraces for the
residential units or commercial suites are encouraged to
face the courtyard or courtyards, however they may be
permitted to also face the street and/or Murrieta Creek
where appropriate.
iv. Private outdoor patios, balconies or terraces are
permitted to face the rear or side yards when building
separation permits based upon building and fire codes.
v. The minimum private open space requirements shall
be met in accordance with the Urban Standards for each
zone.
e. Courtyard Building-Landscape Standards:
i. City’s street trees are the dominant landscape feature
along the primary and secondary streets. Limited
accent landscaping (as defined in the glossary) such as,
but not limited to, potted or hanging plants may be
placed within between the property line and build-to
line but shall not encroach into this are more than three
feet.
ii. All portions of private property not covered by
building area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped.
iii. At-grade or raised landscape planters are not
permitted to be located between the property line and
build-to line (along the primary and secondary street).
iv. At grade or raised landscape planters may be
permitted behind the build-to line when portions of the
building façade do not abut the build-to line. For
example, when the forecourt frontage type is used
and/or recessed entries are part of the building design.
v. Thirty percent of the interior courtyard areas shall be
landscaped. This landscaping shall include at least one
36-inch box specimen tree in combination with smaller
trees, shrubs, groundcover and flowering perennials.
vi. All yard areas that are required to be landscaped
shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, groundcover and
flowering perennials. Trees may be planted as space
permits dependent upon the setbacks for the zone.
vii. Any trees planted on private property within the
courtyard area shall not conflict with the City street
trees, as determined by the City’s landscape architect.
viii. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E.
ix. The plant palette shall be consistent with the
approved Old Town Specific Plan Plant List contained
in the appendices of this Specific Plan.
IV-74
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
f. Courtyard Building-Floor Plan Standards:
i. Leasable commercial space within the building on the
first floor shall be oriented toward the street and/or
Murrieta Creek, or toward the internal shared courtyard
area.
ii. Service and utility rooms within the building shall be
oriented toward the rear or side of the building or site.
iii. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Courtyard building type shall be in compliance with the
zone.
iv. If residential units within a courtyard building face
any street frontage or Murrieta Creek they shall be
slightly raised above the finished grade of the adjacent
sidewalk to avoid a view directly into the units from the
street.
g. Courtyard Building-Building Size and Massing
Standards:
i. Dwelling units located on the top floor are
encouraged to be stepped back on all facades facing the
street to achieve variation in the wall plane and to
accommodate open air patios, balconies or terraces.
IV-75
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
3. Bungalow Courtyard
The Bungalow Courtyard building type typically
consists of four or more single family detached houses,
or multi-family duplexes, triplexes or quadplexes
arrayed next to one another to form a shared interior
courtyard area that is partially or wholly open to the
public realm.
Figure IV-39: Photo examples of Bungalow
Courtyard building type.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by zoning
district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Bungalow
Courtyard
Building
N Y Y
Figure IV-38: Illustrative sketch of a typical Bungalow
Courtyard building type.
IV-76
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Bungalow Courtyard-Pedestrian and Vehicular
Access Standards:
i. The main pedestrian access to each ground floor
dwelling unit shall be taken directly from the street or
from the shared internal courtyard area.
ii. Access to second story dwelling units shall be taken
from an open or roofed stairway located within the
courtyard. Exterior stairs are not permitted to be located
between the property line and build-to line. Stairs
should be screened from the street and architecturally
integrated into the building design.
iii. If multiple courtyards exist they shall be connected
to one another and connected to the public right-of-way
by a paseo or zaguan.
iv. Vehicular access to the site shall be provided from a
private alley or from the secondary street.
v. Vehicular access from the primary street frontage is
permitted only if no other access to the site is feasible.
b. Bungalow Courtyard-Parking Facilities
Standards:
i. Parking shall be configured in a subterranean parking
lot or underground garage facility, tuck under parking
or podium configuration, individual at-grade garages,
alley loaded garages, or any combination of the above
mentioned parking configurations.
ii. At grade parking lots with or without carports may
be permitted when the parking area is completely
screened from the street.
iii. All parking facilities shall meet the required
setbacks outlined by zone in the Urban Standards
Section IV.D of this Specific Plan. Parking shall not be
visible from the street.
Figure IV-40: Illustrative sketched examples of
acceptable pedestrian and vehicular access for a typical
Bungalow Courtyard Building type.
IV-77
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Bungalow Courtyard-Utilitarian Standards:
i. When an alley exists, utilitarian items (including, but
not limited to utilities, trash pick-up areas, and above
ground equipment) shall be located adjacent to the alley
behind the property line. For lots without an alley,
utilitarian items shall be located in a side or rear yard,
or within internal courtyards when appropriate.
ii. When above ground service or utilitarian equipment
is located within the courtyard they shall be grouped
together and screened with landscaping.
iii. Utilitarian items may also be located within parking
areas, in or adjacent to garages, inside the building
within a mechanical/utility room, or in a building
“notch out” when appropriate.
iv. Service and utilities design and placement shall be in
accordance with the Utility and Infrastructure Design
Guidelines in Section V.K and the Alley Design
Guidelines in Section V.J.
d. Bungalow Courtyard-Private Open Space
Standards:
i. The central courtyard or courtyards shall be
comprised of at least 15 percent of the total net lot area.
ii. Courtyards are permitted to be located on the ground
floor or on a podium.
iii. Private outdoor patios, balconies and terraces are
required for each residential unit and are encouraged to
face the internal courtyard; however they may be
permitted to face the street and/or Murrieta Creek where
appropriate.
iv. Porches shall be permitted to count toward the
minimum private open space requirements.
v. The minimum private open space requirements shall
be met in accordance with the Urban Standards for each
zone.
e. Bungalow Courtyard-Landscape Standards:
i. The dominant landscape feature along the primary
and secondary street frontage is the City’s street trees.
Limited accent landscaping (as defined in the glossary)
such as potted or hanging plants may be placed between
the property line and the build-to line, not to encroach
more than 3 feet over the build-to line.
ii. All portions of private property not covered by
building area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped with
accent landscape treatments.
iii. At-grade or raised landscape planters are allowed to
be located between the property line and the build-to
line (along the primary and secondary street) but shall
not encroach more than three feet over the build-to line.
iv. Thirty percent of the interior courtyard shall be
landscaped. This landscaped area shall include at least
one 36-inch box sized specimen tree in combination
with smaller trees, shrub, groundcover and flowering
perennials.
v. All yard areas that are required to be landscaped shall
include a variety of shrubs, groundcover and flowering
perennials. Trees may be planted when space permits
dependent upon the required setbacks for each zone.
vi. Any trees planted on private property including
areas within the courtyard shall not conflict with City
street trees as determined by the City’s landscape
architect.
vii. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E.
viii. The plant palette shall be consistent with the Old
Town Specific Plan Plant List contained in the
appendices of this Specific Plan.
f. Bungalow Courtyard-Floor Plan Standards:
i. Residential units that directly face any street frontage
and/or Murrieta Creek shall be raised slightly above the
finished grade of the adjacent sidewalk to avoid a view
directly into the units from street level.
ii. Service and utility rooms shall be located at the rear
or side of the building or site to the greatest extent
possible. Service and utility rooms shall not front upon
the courtyard.
iii. Buildings shall be designed to orient living areas
such as living rooms, dining rooms and kitchens toward
the street or courtyard and orient sleeping areas and
bedrooms away from the street or courtyard.
iv. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Bungalow Courtyard building type shall be in
compliance with the zone.
IV-78
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
g. Bungalow Courtyard-Building Size and Massing
Standards:
i. Dwelling units located on the top floor are
encouraged to be stepped back on all facades facing the
street to achieve variation in the wall plane and to
accommodate open air patios, balconies or terraces.
IV-79
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND UR BAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4. Rowhouse
The Rowhouse building type consists of a single
building or multiple buildings containing attached
residential units typically connected by common walls.
Typically, Rowhouse buildings are placed on the lot in
a manner that creates space for a rear yard and space for
individual garages. Rowhouses are arrayed side-by-side
and give the appearance of a continuous stretch of
residential facades along the street.
Figure IV-41: Illustrative sketch of typical Rowhouse
building type.
Figure IV-42: Photo examples of typical Rowhouse
building type.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by zoning
district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Rowhouse
Building
Y Y Y
IV-80
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Rowhouse Building-Pedestrian and Vehicular
Access Standards:
i. The main entrance to each unit shall face the street.
ii. The main entrance to each unit shall be accessed
from the street.
iii. Vehicular access shall be provided from an alley
(when present).
iv. For lots without any alley, vehicular access shall be
provided from the secondary street.
v. For lots without a secondary street frontage and
without alley access, vehicular access may be permitted
to be taken (preferably through the building) from the
primary street frontage if no other option is feasible. In
this case, reciprocal or shared access is encouraged to
minimize the number of curb cuts taken from the
primary street.
b. Rowhouse Building-Parking Facilities Standards:
i. Parking areas and/or garages shall be located behind
the Rowhouse at the rear of the site to the greatest
extent possible.
ii. Parking facilities shall meet the required setbacks
outlined in the Urban Standards Section IV.D of this
Specific Plan.
iii. Parking facilities, including garages shall not be
visible from the street.
c. Rowhouse Building-Utilitarian Standards:
i. Utilitarian items (including but not limited to all
utilities, trash containers and above ground equipment)
shall be located adjacent to the alley behind the
property line or in the rear or side yard when no alley
exists.
ii. Utilitarian items may also be located within parking
areas or adjacent to, or within, individual garages when
appropriate.
iii. If a stoop or porch frontage is used in combination
with the Rowhouse building type the area located at the
front of the building in between each porch or stoop
may accommodate utility equipment if landscaping is
provided to completely screen the above ground utility
equipment.
iv. Utility and service equipment may be located inside
the building, within a mechanical/utility room, or within
a building “notch out” as appropriate.
v. Service and utilities shall be designed in accordance
with the Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines in
Section V.K and the Alley Design Guidelines in Section
V.J.
Figure IV-43: Illustrative sketched examples of acceptable pedestrian and vehicular access for a typical Rowhouse building type.
IV-81
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Rowhouse Building-Private Open Space
Requirements:
i. Patios on the first floor shall face the street.
ii. Private open space areas such as balconies and
terraces above the first floor shall meet the
encroachment requirements for the zone.
iii. Each unit shall have at least one door leading to an
outdoor yard, patio, terrace or balcony.
iv. The minimum private open space requirements shall
be according to the Urban Standards required for each
zone.
e. Rowhouse Building-Landscape Standards:
i. City street trees are the primary landscape treatments
along the primary and secondary streets for this
building type. Limited urban accent landscape
treatments such as but not limited to potted and/or
hanging plants are secondary to the City street trees.
ii. When a stoop or porch frontage type is used in
combination with the Rowhouse building type the area
located at the front of the building in-between each
stoop or porch shall be landscaped with shrubs,
groundcover and flowering perennials. Trees shall not
be permitted to be planted within these areas to avoid
conflicts with City street trees.
iii. All portions of private property not covered by
building area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped.
iv. At grade or raised landscape planters are not
permitted between the property line and the build-to
line (along the primary and secondary street) except
when a stoop or porch is used in combination with the
Rowhouse building type.
v. At grade or raised landscape planters may be
permitted behind the build-to line when portions of the
building façade do not abut the build-to line. For
example, when the forecourt frontage type is used
and/or recessed entries are part of the building design.
vi. Side and rear yard areas shall be landscaped with a
variety of shrubs, groundcover and flowering
perennials. Trees shall be planted within rear and side
yard areas as space permits as determined by the City’s
landscape architect.
vii. Plants selected shall be in compliance with the Old
Town Specific Plan Plant list contained in the
appendices of this Specific Plan.
viii. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E.
f. Rowhouse Building-Floor Plan Standards:
i. Residential units that directly face any street frontage
or Murrieta Creek shall be raised slightly above the
finished grade of the adjacent sidewalk to avoid a view
directly into the units from street level.
ii. Service and utility rooms shall be located at the rear
or side of the building or site to the greatest extent
possible.
iii. Buildings shall be designed to orient living areas
such as living rooms, dining rooms and kitchens toward
the street and orient sleeping areas and bedrooms away
from the street or courtyard.
iv. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Rowhouse building type shall be in compliance with the
zone.
g. Rowhouse Building-Building Size and Massing
Standards:
i. Rowhouse buildings may be permitted to be
composed of one dominant volume but should meet the
design guideline criteria for architectural expression and
variation in the building facade.
ii. Rowhouse buildings shall be designed to articulate
the individual units along the street.
IV-82
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
5. Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex
Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex buildings are configured
into two, three or four separate attached residential units
that are designed and architecturally presented as a
large single-family residence in their typical
neighborhood setting.
Figure IV-44: Illustrative sketch of a typical Duplex,
Triplex, Quadplex building type.
Figure IV-45: Photo examples of Duplex, Triplex and
Quadplex building type.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by
zoning district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Duplex,
Triplex,
Quadplex
Building
N Y Y
IV-83
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Duplex, Triplex, Quadplex Building-Pedestrian
and Vehicular Access Standards:
i. When a building façade is adjacent to the street, the
main entry shall front upon the street.
ii. Pedestrian access to buildings that do not front upon
the street shall be taken from a shared open space area
or other common area.
iii. Vehicular access to the site shall be provided from a
(private) alley or from the secondary street.
iv. Vehicular access from the primary street frontage is
permitted only if no other access to the site is feasible.
b. Duplex, Triplex, Quadplex Building-Parking
Facilities Standards:
i. Parking shall be accommodated in an internal parking
lot that is architecturally integrated or screened from the
street, in a tuck under parking configuration, alley
loaded garage configuration, individual garages, or any
combination of the above mentioned.
ii. All parking facilities shall meet the required setbacks
in the Urban Standards (Section IV.D of this chapter)
and shall not be visible from the street.
c. Duplex, Triplex, Quadplex- Utilitarian Standards:
i. Utilitarian items (including but not limited to utilities,
trash pick-up areas, and above ground equipment) shall
be located within the rear or side yard setbacks when no
private alley exists or within internal common areas. If
a private alley is created through site design and layout,
utilitarian items shall be provided adjacent to the private
alley.
ii. Utilitarian items may also be located within parking
areas, inside the building, within mechanical/utility
rooms, or within building “notch outs” when
appropriate.
iii. Service and utilities shall be designed in accordance
with the Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines in
Section V.K and with the Alley Design Guidelines in
Section V.J.
Figure IV-46: Illustrative conceptual sketch of
acceptable pedestrian and vehicular access for typical
Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex building type.
IV-84
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex Buildings-Private
Open Space Standards:
i. Private outdoor patios, balconies and terraces are
encouraged to face the street or Murrieta Creek, but
may also face shared internal common areas where
appropriate.
ii. Private outdoor patios, terraces and balconies are
permitted to face rear and/or side yards when allowed
by appropriate building separation requirements
outlined in building and fire codes.
iii. The minimum private open space requirements shall
be met in accordance with the Urban Standards for each
zone.
e. Duplex, Triplex, and Quadplex-Landscape
Standards:
i. City street trees are the primary landscape treatments
along the street. Limited urban accent landscape
treatments such as potted and/or hanging plants are
secondary to City street trees and should be used to
soften and accent the building façade.
ii. When a stoop or porch frontage type is used in
combination with the Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex
building type the area located at the front of the
building between each stoop or porch shall be
landscaped with shrubs, groundcover and flowering
perennials. Trees shall not be permitted to be planted
within these areas to avoid conflicts with City street
trees.
iii. Portions of private property not covered by building
area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped.
iv. At grade or raised landscape planters are not
permitted between the property line and the build-to
line (along the primary and secondary street) except
when a stoop or porch is used in combination with the
Duplex, Triplex and/or Quadplex building type.
v. At grade or raised landscape planters may be
permitted behind the build-to line when the building
façade does not abut the build-to line. For example,
when a project utilizes built-in planter boxes combined
with the forecourt frontage and/or when recessed entries
are part of the building design.
vi. Side and rear yard areas shall be landscaped with a
variety of shrubs, groundcover and flowering
perennials. Trees may be planted as space permits.
vii. Shared common areas that are created as a result of
clustering the buildings on a site shall be landscaped
and hardscaped.
viii. Plants selected shall be in compliance with the Old
Town Specific Plan Plant list contained in the
appendices of this Specific Plan.
ix. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E.
f. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex Building-Floor
Plan Standards
i. Residential units that directly face any street frontage
or Murrieta Creek shall be raised slightly above the
finished grade of the sidewalk to avoid a view directly
into the units from street level.
ii. Service and utility rooms shall be located at the rear
or side of the building or site to the greatest extent
possible.
iii. Buildings shall be designed to orient living areas
such as living rooms, dining rooms and kitchens toward
the street and orient sleeping areas and bedrooms away
from the street.
iv. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Duplex, Triplex, Quadplex building types shall be in
compliance with the zone.
g. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex Buildings-Building
Size and Massing Standards:
i. The incorporation of outdoor open spaces such as
patios, terraces and balconies shall be incorporated into
the building design.
ii. Duplex, Triplex and Quadplex buildings should be
designed to articulate the individual units along the
street.
IV-85
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
6. Detached House
The Detached House building type is a residential
structure that is not attached to any other residential
structure or unit and is intended for single-family
residential use only. Detached houses are not intended
for commercial occupancy (with the exception of Bed
and Breakfast establishments).
Figure IV-47: Illustrative sketch of a typical Detached
House building type.
Figure IV-48: Photo examples of a Detached House
building type.
Building
Type:
Allowable building type by
zoning district:
DTC &
DTC/HO
R/LMU NR
Detached
House
N N Y
IV-86
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Detached House-Pedestrian and Vehicular Access
Standards:
i. The main pedestrian entrance to the Detached House
Building type shall be taken from the street.
ii. The main vehicular access to the site shall be taken
from either the secondary street (where present) or from
the primary street via a twelve foot (minimum) to thirty
foot (maximum) wide vehicular driveway built per the
City’s Residential Driveway Standard No. 207.
b. Detached House-Parking Facilities Standards:
i. A minimum of two parking spaces shall be provided
within an enclosed garage with a minimum dimension
of 10 feet by 20 feet each.
ii. Garages shall meet the minimum setbacks for the
zone.
iii. Garages shall be placed as close to the rear or side of
the property as possible and shall not be readily visible
from the street.
iv. Garages may be attached to the Detached House
building or may be a freestanding structure.
c. Detached House-Utilitarian Standards:
i. Utilitarian items (including but not limited to utilities,
trash pick-up areas, and above ground equipment) shall
be placed at the rear or side of the property or in a
manner where the utilitarian items and equipment are
screened from public view.
d. Detached House-Private Open Space Standards:
i. Private open space areas such as patios and porches
are encouraged to front upon the street but are also
permitted to face the rear yard.
ii. The minimum private open space requirements shall
be met in accordance with the Urban Standards for each
zone.
Figure IV-49: Illustrative conceptual sketch of acceptable pedestrian and vehicular access for a typical Detached House building type.
IV-87
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. Detached House-Landscape Standards:
i. The primary landscape treatment along the street
frontage for the Detached House building type shall be
the City’s street trees.
ii. All portions of private property not covered with
building area and/or hardscape shall be landscaped.
iii. At grade or raised landscape planters are not
permitted between the property line and the build-to
line (along the primary and secondary street) except
when a stoop or porch is used in combination with the
Detached House building type.
iv. At grade landscape planters may be permitted
behind the build-to line when the building façade does
not abut the build-to line. For example, when recessed
entries or building articulation is utilized to allow for
landscaping between the build-to line and building
façade.
v. Trees may be planted, as space permits as determined
by the City’s landscape architect.
vi. Plants selected shall be in compliance with the Old
Town Specific Plan Plant list contained in the
appendices of this Specific Plan.
vii. Landscaping shall comply with the Landscape
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.E.
f. Detached House-Floor Plan Standards:
i. Service and utility rooms shall be located at the rear
or side of the building or site to the greatest extent
possible.
ii. Buildings shall be designed to orient living areas
such as living rooms, dining rooms and kitchens toward
the street and orient sleeping areas and bedrooms away
from the street.
iii. Building Frontages used in combination with the
Detached House building type shall be in compliance
with the requirements for the zone.
g. Detached House-Building Size and Massing
Standards:
i. Detached houses should employ variation in the roof
planes and incorporate single-story elements on
prominent elevations that face the street or public realm
(including Murrieta Creek).
IV-88
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
F. BUILDING FRONTAGE STANDARDS
This section identifies the seven frontage types that are
allowed within the Old Town Specific Plan area. Each
frontage type is subject to the Urban Standards and
requirements for each zoning district as outlined in
Section IV.D (Urban Standards) of this chapter. The
frontage types allowed in Old Town are as follows and
are organized and discussed in more detail in the
following section:
• Shopfront
• Arcade
• Gallery
• Two-Story Gallery
• Forecourt
• Stoop
• Porch
• Raised Commercial Porch
Additionally, this section includes a discussion of, and
provides specific requirements and standards for, all
commercial ground floor facades regardless of frontage
type.
IV-89
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. Frontage Types
a. Shopfront Frontage
Shopfront frontage is typically used for retail uses.
Various Shopfront designs are permitted as illustrated
in the Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines
addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Height of Bulkhead…………..…………. 3’ max.
B: Height of Display Window………………6’ min.
C: Top of Display Window………………… 8’ min.
D: Floor to Ceiling Height………………... 12’ min.
E: Width of Display Window……………...14’ max.
F: Depth of Recessed Entry……….…..…….6’ max.
G: Height of Canopy/Awning…..…………..8’ min.
ii. For the purposes of regulating the development and
massing of Shopfronts, no Shopfront facing a public
street shall be more than 100 feet wide without
incorporating architectural elements into the façade to
convey the appearance of multiple shops rather than one
large facade.
Figure IV-50a (above): Overview of a Shopfront
frontage.
Figure IV-50b, c (right): Side view and bird’s eye view
of a Shopfront frontage.
IV-90
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Arcade Frontage
Arcades are facades with an attached colonnade that
structurally supports the building above it. The design
of an Arcade shall compliment the overall appearance
of the facade and shall be consistent with the
architecture of the building. The ground floor façade is
aligned at the build-to line, and the upper stories extend
out to the property line but not into the public right-of-
way. Various Arcade designs are permitted as
illustrated in the Old Town Specific Plan Design
Guidelines addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Height of Bulkhead…………..…………. 3’ max.
B: Height of Display Window………………6’ min.
C: Top of Display Window………………… 8’ min.
D: Floor to Ceiling Height………………... 12’ min.
E: Width of Display Window……………...14’ max.
F: Depth of Recessed Entry……….…..…….6’ max.
G: Height of Arcade……………..………….12’ min.
H: Width Between Columns……….……….14’ max.
I: Not Used……………………………………….N/A
J. Width of Covered Walkway…….…8’ min., 10’ max
K: Column Dimensions………….10” min., 24” max
Figure IV-51a (above): Overview of an Arcade frontage.
Figure IV-51 b, c (right): Side view and bird’s eye view
of an Arcade frontage.
IV-90
IV-91
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Gallery Frontage
Gallery Frontage is the addition of an attached, covered
colonnade that structurally supports the roof or balcony
above it. The arcade shall correspond to the facade and
shall be consistent with the architecture of the building.
The ground floor façade is aligned at the build-to line,
and the upper stories extend out to the property line but
not into the public right-of-way.
Various Gallery designs are permitted as illustrated in
the Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines
addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Height of Bulkhead…………..…………. 3’ max.
B: Height of Display Window………………6’ min.
C: Top of Display Window………………… 8’ min.
D: Floor to Ceiling Height………………... 12’ min.
E: Width of Display Window……………...14’ max.
F: Depth of Recessed Entry……….…..…….6’ max.
G: Height of Arcade……………..………….12’ min.
H: Width Between Columns……….……….14’ max.
I: Not Used………………………………………N/A
J. Width of Covered Walkway…………….…8’ min.
K: Column Dimensions………….10” min., 24” max
L: Balcony Height…….………………...…30” min.
Figure IV-52a (above): Overview of a Gallery frontage.
Figure IV-52 b, c (right): Side view and bird’s eye view
of a Gallery frontage.
IV-91
IV-92
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Two-Story Gallery Frontage
A Two-Story Gallery frontage is the addition of an
attached, covered colonnade that structurally supports a
two-story arcade consisting of a variety of different
configurations including a balcony at the second floor
with a roof above it, a balcony at the second and third
floor with or without a roof, or a two-story covered
arcade with no balcony and a roof above the second
floor. The overall design of the Two-Story Gallery
shall complement the façade and shall be consistent
with the architectural style of the building. The ground
floor façade is aligned at the build-to line, and the upper
stories extend out to the property line but not into the
public right-of-way.
Various Two-Story Gallery designs are permitted as
illustrated in the Old Town Specific Plan Design
Guidelines addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Height of Bulkhead…………..…………. 3’ max.
B: Height of Display Window………………6’ min.
C: Top of Display Window………………… 8’ min.
D: Floor to Ceiling Height………….…….....12’ min.
E: Width of Display Window…….………...14’ max.
F: Depth of Recessed Entry……………..…6’ max.
G: Height of Arcade………………..12’ min. per floor
H: Width Between Columns……….……….14’ max.
I: Not Used…………………………………..N/A
J. Width of Covered Walkway……………….8’ min.
K: Column Dimensions…………..10” min., 24” max
L: Balcony Height…….………………...……30” min.
Figure IV-52a (above): Overview of a Two-Story
Gallery frontage.
Figure IV-52b, c (right): Side view and bird’s eye view
of a Two-Story Gallery frontage.
IV-92
IV-93
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. Forecourt Frontage
A Forecourt is an uncovered area in the front of the
building façade. A Forecourt is created by a portion of
the building that is set back from the build-to line which
creates a pedestrian friendly, semi-public open area that
is adjacent to the sidewalk. Forecourts may also
provide access to ground floor or upper floor tenants
and provide for restaurant seating or access to paseos or
other pedestrian connections. Forecourts may be
combined with other frontage types and may allow for
vehicular access to parking behind the building. The
minimum width of a Forecourt is 16 feet; however, if it
also provides vehicular access to the rear of the
building, the minimum width is 16 feet plus the width
of the drive lane.
Various Forecourt designs are permitted as illustrated in
the Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines
addressed in Chapter V. In addition, the Appendices
section of this Specific Plan also includes a case study
that discusses the Forecourt frontage type.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Width of Forecourt …………..………….15’ min.
B: Depth of Forecourt………………………60’ max.
Figure IV-53 (above): Bird’s eye view of a Forecourt
frontage.
IV-93
IV-94
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
f. Residential Stoop Frontage
A Residential Stoop frontage type is for residential
buildings that have a raised first floor entry. Exterior
stairs and a porch/landing provide access to the
residence. The building façade is positioned on the
build-to line, and the Stoop occupies the area between
the façade and the property line (the “Frontage Zone”).
The exterior stairs may be perpendicular and/or parallel
to the sidewalk. The landing/porch may be covered or
uncovered. The elevation of the first floor entry door
shall be a minimum of 36 inches above the walking
grade of the Pedestrian Zone of the sidewalk.
Various Stoop frontage designs are permitted as
illustrated in the Old Town Specific Plan Design
Guidelines addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A: Build-To Line from Property…....…….10’
B: Height of Stoop …………………………3’ min.
C: Width of Stoop…………………………..5’ min.
D. Depth of Stoop…………………………..4’ min.
IV-95
Figure IV-54: Bird’s eye view of
Stoop frontages.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
g. Residential Porch Frontage
A Residential Porch Frontage type is for residential
building types that have a raised first floor entry.
Exterior stairs and a Porch provides access to the
residence. The Porch landing is positioned at the
build-to line, and the stairs and pedestrian pathway to
the Porch extend into the area between the Porch
landing and the property line (the “Frontage Zone”).
The exterior stairs may be perpendicular and/or parallel
to the sidewalk. The Porch shall be 10 feet in width
and shall be consistent with the architecture of the
building. The elevation of the Porch shall be no more
than 36 inches above the grade of the building pad.
Various Porch frontage designs are permitted as
illustrated in the Old Town Specific Plan Design
Guidelines addressed in Chapter V.
The following dimensional standards shall apply:
A. Curb to Property Line…………………………..10’
B: Property Line to Build-to Line…....…………….10’
C. Depth of Porch..……………………………..6’ min.
D: Width of Porch...………………………… 10’ min.
E: Height of Porch Landing…....No more than 3’ from
the grade of the building pad
IV-96
Figure IV-55: Bird’s eye view of a
Porch frontage.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
h. Raised Commercial Porch
A Raised Commercial Front Porch type is for
commercial building types that have a raised first floor
porch and entry. Exterior stairs and a raised porch
provide access to the commercial uses. The porch
landing is positioned at the build-to-line, and the stairs
and pedestrian pathway to the Porch extend into the
area between the Porch landing and the property line
(the “Frontage Zone”). The exterior stairs may be
perpendicular and/or parallel to the sidewalk. The Porch
may incorporate all elevations facing the public right-of
way. Porch material finish shall be architecturally
compatible with the structure. The elevation of the
Porch shall be no more than 24 inches above the
adjoining sidewalk.
IV-97
2’
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
IV-98
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
G. SUPPLEMENTAL AND SPECIAL USE
STANDARDS
The following supplemental development standards
shall apply within the Old Town Specific Plan area.
1. Sidewalk Cafes/Outdoor Dining Areas
a. Intent
Sidewalk cafes/outdoor dining areas along building
frontages that enhance the pedestrian ambiance of Old
Town are encouraged. A sidewalk café/outdoor dining
area is defined as any group of tables and chairs, and
related amenities situated on private property to provide
for outdoor dining in connection with the consumption
of food and beverage sold to the public from an
adjoining indoor restaurant or eating establishment.
b. Sidewalk Cafes/Outdoor Dining Areas Permitted
Sidewalk cafés/outdoor dining areas may be permitted
only in the districts that allow indoor eating
establishments subject to the approval of a minor
modification to an approved development plan or as
part of a new development plan. Sidewalk
Cafes/Outdoor Dining areas are permitted only on
private property on the site where the indoor eating
establishment operates. Sidewalk cafes and outdoor
dining areas shall comply with the Outdoor
Dining/Sidewalk Café Design Guidelines contained in
Chapter V of this Specific Plan.
c. Requirements
A Sidewalk café/outdoor dining area may be permitted
on private property where space is adequate to
accommodate both the usual pedestrian traffic in the
area and the operation of the proposed Sidewalk Cafe.
There shall be a minimum 48" clear distance free of all
obstructions in order to allow adequate pedestrian
movement. A sidewalk café shall comply with all of
the following:
i. A sidewalk café shall be located immediately adjacent
to and abutting the indoor eating establishment.
ii. A sidewalk café shall not extend beyond the length
of the actual indoor eating establishment frontage.
iii. A sidewalk café shall not extend beyond the
Frontage Zone.
iv. All outdoor dining furniture including tables and
chairs, and all outdoor amenities (such as outdoor
heaters, planters, trash bins and umbrellas, etc.) shall be
reviewed by the Planning Department for approval.
v. Umbrellas must be secured with a base weighing no
less than 60 pounds.
vi. If a physical barrier is required by the Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control to serve alcoholic
beverages, the design of the barrier shall be approved
by the Planning Director. The physical barrier shall
comply with the Outdoor Dining/Sidewalk Café Design
Guidelines outlined in Chapter V of this Specific Plan.
d. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation
All sidewalk cafes shall comply with the following
performance standards:
i. A sidewalk cafe may serve only food and beverages
prepared or stocked for sale at the adjoining indoor
restaurant.
ii. All trash and litter shall be removed immediately.
Trash bins shall be emptied as trash accumulates but no
less than once a day. The permittee shall be responsible
for maintaining the outdoor dining area, including the
sidewalk surface and furniture and adjacent areas in a
clean and safe condition.
iii. The City shall have the right to prohibit the
operation of a sidewalk cafe at any time because of
anticipated or actual problems or conflicts in the use of
the sidewalk area. Such problems and conflicts may
arise from, but are not limited to, scheduled festivals
and similar events, parades, repairs to the street or
sidewalk, or emergencies occurring in the area. To the
extent possible, the permittee will be given prior written
notice of any time period during which the operation of
the sidewalk cafe will be prohibited by the City.
e. Suspension or Revocation
A permit to operate a sidewalk café may be suspended
or revoked upon a finding that one or more conditions
of approval for the permit or the requirements of this
Specific Plan have been violated, or that the sidewalk
cafe is being operated in a manner which constitutes a
nuisance, or that the operation of the sidewalk cafe
unduly impedes or restricts the movement of
pedestrians past the sidewalk cafe.
IV-99
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Vending Carts
a. Intent
Outdoor vending carts on private property promote
public interest by contributing to an active pedestrian
environment. However, reasonable regulation of
outdoor vending carts is necessary to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare. The purpose of this section
is to set forth the conditions and requirements under
which outdoor vendors may be permitted to operate on
private property within the Specific Plan area.
b. Vendor Permit Required
It shall be unlawful to sell, or offer for sale, any food,
beverage or merchandise from a vending cart on any
property within the Specific Plan area without first
obtaining a Vendors Permit. Applications for a vendors
permit shall include a description of the type of
merchandise or food to be sold, a detailed description
and photograph of the cart, and the approval of the
property owner of the site where the cart will be
located. Vending permit applications shall be reviewed
by the Old Town Local Review Board. Vendor permit
applications may be approved by administratively by
the Director of Planning. The Director of Planning may
apply any conditions necessary to protect the public
health, safety, and welfare.
c. c. Vending Cart Requirements
Vending carts shall comply with the following
requirements:
i. All vending carts shall be located only on privately
owned, developed commercial or mixed-use property.
There should be at least 150 square feet of useable or
recognizable plaza or courtyard area for each vending
cart.
ii. The design and appearance of the vending cart shall
be consistent with the character consistent with the
design guidelines of the Specific Plan. Colors used in
conjunction with any vending carts located in the Old
Town Specific Plan area shall be consistent with the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette.
iii. Any umbrellas or accessory items used with vending
carts shall be made from high quality canvas, utilize a
monochromatic color scheme consistent with the
Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette and have no
written or graphic advertising.
iv. No cart shall exceed 4 feet in width, 8 feet in length,
and 8 feet in height.
v. Vending carts should be free of all obstructions
within a six-foot perimeter.
vi. No advertising, except the posting of prices and
product identification, is permitted on any vending cart.
The total allowable square footage for vendor cart
signage shall not exceed four square feet on up to two
opposing sides of the cart.
vii. Pedestrian movement shall not be obstructed.
Vending Carts shall be placed on private property
where there is adequate space so that patrons waiting in
line do not extend into or obstruct the public right of
way.
d. Conduct of Business and Hours of Operation
All vending carts shall comply with the following
performance standards:
i. Operate only between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. unless in
conjunction with an approved special event.
ii. All items for sale shall be placed only in, on or under
the vending cart. No additional merchandise
preparation or sales table, crate, carton, rack, or any
other device to increase the selling or display capacity
of the cart shall be used unless it has been approved in
writing by the Director of Planning.
iii. The vending cart operator shall not solicit or conduct
business with persons in motor vehicles.
iv. Loudspeakers, public address (PA) system, radio,
sound amplifier, or similar devices shall not be operated
in conjunction with a vending cart.
v. All vending carts shall require an approved City of
Temecula business license.
vi. Vending carts selling food or beverages shall
comply with the requirements of the Health Department
and shall provide a trash receptacle for public use.
vii. The vending cart operator shall clean up the area
around where the vending cart had been. This includes
removing and disposing of all trash or refuse.
IV-100
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
viii.. The Director of Planning may require that the
vending cart be removed from the location and stored
out of public view when not in use.
e. Denial, Suspension or Revocation of a Vending
Permit
i. Any license may be denied, suspended, or revoked in
accordance with the procedures in the Development
Code for any of the following causes:
ii. Fraud or misrepresentation contained in the
application for the license.
iii. Fraud or misrepresentation made in the course of
carrying out the business of vending.
iv. Conduct of the licensed business in such manner as
to create a public nuisance, or constitute a danger to the
public health, safety, welfare, or morals or inconsistent
with any conditions of approval.
v. Conduct of the business which is contrary to the
provisions of this Specific Plan or the conditions of
approval for the vending cart permit.
3. Mixed-Use Standards
a. Intent
The development of commercial and residential uses in
close proximity can present unique design issues not
encountered in zones where uses are limited to only
commercial or only residential. The primary design
issues relate to successfully balancing the
characteristics of commercial and residential uses.
Typical examples include a residential need for privacy
and security mixed with the needs of commercial uses
for access, visibility, parking and loading. These
supplemental performance standards are provided to
ensure compatibility of mixed-uses.
It is the intent of the Old Town Specific Plan to use
these special standards to supplement the Old Town
Specific Plan Development Standards and ordinances
that exist within the Temecula Municipal Code to
protect neighboring uses from excessive noise, odor,
smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially
objectionable impacts. Mixed-use districts are defined
as districts of the Old Town Specific Plan which
combine both commercial and residential uses. Mixed-
use projects are defined as developments that combine
both commercial and residential uses on a single lot or
within a single structure. For purposes of this Specific
Plan, mixed-use standards shall apply to all mixed-use
districts within the Old Town Specific Plan, regardless
of whether a development is a mixed-use project.
b. Limitations and Requirements
i. Noise/Aesthetics:
• All uses shall comply with the Title 9 of the
Temecula Municipal Code to regulate noise
within all districts of the Old Town Specific
Plan.
• All roof mounted equipment shall be screened
in accordance with the requirements of the
Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
• Special consideration shall be given to the
location and screening of or noise generating
or vibrating equipment such as refrigeration
units, air conditioning, and exhaust fans.
• Vibration or noise reducing screens and
insulation may be required where such
equipment has the potential to impact
residential uses.
ii. Odor:
• Restaurants shall implement a kitchen exhaust
system for grease, odor and smoke control.
All machinery and equipment shall be installed
and maintained and the activity shall be
conducted so that noise, smoke, dust, odor and
all other objectionable factors, shall be
confined or reduced to the extent that no
annoyance or injury will result to residents or
persons in the vicinity.
IV-101
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
iii. Lighting/Glare:
• Lighting shall be located so as to minimize the
impact of lighting upon adjacent buildings and
properties, especially residential uses.
• Any lighting source, including illuminated
signs, shall be positioned so that light does not
shine directly into residential windows.
• No outdoor lights shall be permitted that blink,
revolve, flash or change intensity.
4. Balconies, Patios, and Porches
a. Intent
Balconies, patios and porches shall be maintained clean,
orderly and free of clutter. All furnishings shall be
designed for outdoor use only.
b. Requirements
i. No permanent or temporary enclosure including
shutters, blinds or partition shall be affixed to any area
of the porch, patio or balcony. If any change to the
exterior appearance of the porch, balcony or patio is
desired, a minor modification shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval.
ii. Freestanding spas, hot tubs or similar amenities shall
be screened from public view. The placement of such
items on balconies, patios and porches are subject to the
review and approval of the Director of Planning.
iii. Balconies, patios and porches may not be used for
storage.
iv. Clothing, sheets, blankets, laundry, water
accessories or rafts, toys and similar objects shall not be
hung from or exposed on the balconies, patios or
porches.
v. Planters containing live, well-groomed plants are
permitted provided the plant does not extend beyond the
interior of the balcony, patio or porch. No empty
planters or planters containing dead, diseased or dying
plants may be stored at any time within a balcony, patio
or porch. If it is determined that plants are not being
properly maintained, the Planning Director shall have
the authority to require the property owner to remove or
replace the plantings.
vi. Hoses on porches, patios and balconies shall be kept
in a hose reel or hose hideaway.
5. Bed and Breakfast Establishments
a. Intent
The purpose of this section is to provide standards for
the development and operation of Bed and Breakfast
establishments in Old Town.
b. Requirements
i. All Bed and Breakfast Establishments in Old
Town shall comply with the provisions
contained in Chapter 17.10 of the Temecula
Municipal Code.
c. Supplemental Requirements
In addition to the requirements stated above, the
following shall also apply to Bed and Breakfast
Establishments within the Specific Plan area:
i. Off-street parking shall be provided at a ratio of one
space for each bedroom available for rent in addition to
the parking required for the primary dwelling unit.
ii. Signage shall be limited to one on-site sign not to
exceed 6 square feet in area. The sign may not be
freestanding.
6. Full-Service Hotels
a. Intent
Full-Service Hotels within Old Town shall provide
quality hotel accommodations, with food service and
conference facilities. Full-Service Hotels that provides
amenities and quality hotel accommodations with
conference facilities and food service in a development
that complements commercial and mixed-uses within
the Old Town Specific Plan and would attract local and
regional visitors including businesses and tourists to the
area is encouraged. To assist in providing
accommodations for visitors and businesses, full-
service hotels that provide conference facilities and
food services may be considered for heights up to eight
stories (maximum 100 feet) at locations that front
Moreno Road within the Residential-Limited Mixed-
use (R/LMU) District, subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. Full-Service Hotels with food
service and conference facilities within the Downtown
Core Hotel Overlay (DTC/HO) District are permitted
up to eight stories without a Conditional Use Permit.
All Full-Service Hotels shall comply with the design
criteria and development standards of its zoning district
in addition to the supplemental requirements as follows:
IV-102
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Requirements
i. All hotel lobbies shall be located along streets, plazas,
courtyards, or sidewalks to create visual interest for
pedestrians.
ii. All hotel rooms shall be accessed from an interior
hallway.
iii. The hotel shall provide an onsite restaurant with
table service provided primarily by waitpersons, seating
for at least thirty customers, and full menu service
offering multiple entrees with on-site food preparation.
iv. The hotel shall provide conference facility space to
accommodate a minimum of 1,000 people.
iv. Development shall be designed to create an outdoor
pedestrian space(s) featuring amenities such as benches,
outdoor dining, public art, gardens, courtyard, forecourt
or a plaza.
v. All exterior HVAC and/or air conditioning units shall
be installed on the rooftop and shall be screened
appropriately to eliminate their visibility from adjacent
properties or public view and prevent noise from
disrupting the surrounding community.
vi. Building facades shall be articulated with wall
offsets, recesses, openings, ornamentation, and colors
and materials to add texture with special detail to the
streetscape.
vii. The public art requirement pursuant to Subsection
5.08.06 of Chapter 5.08 of Title 5 of the Temecula
Municipal Code shall be satisfied.
viii. Tandem automobile parking spaces are permitted
when valet services are provided.
ix. Full-service hotels are be permitted to have outdoor
pool and spa facilities on patios, balconies or terraces
located on the second floor or above when integrated
into the building architecture and design.
x. The project shall comply with one or more of the
following conservation programs:
• Utilize LEED (Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design) eligible recycled
building materials (such as exterior siding,
roofing materials, and carpet – 20 percent
minimum recycle content).
• Utilize LEED eligible energy efficient
materials and design to include any of the
following: roofing, insulation, exterior siding,
shading from awnings and deep recessed
windows, automated sensors and controls for
lighting, heating and air conditioning,
waterless urinals, low-flow toilets and faucets,
and aerators and timers on faucets.
• Provide for on-site renewable energy
(minimum of 10 percent of the facilities
energy needs).
• Utilize “green roof” technology.
• Provide water quality mitigation in excess of
minimum NPDES requirements.
• Provide all air conditioning equipment at a
SEER rating that exceeds the minimum
California Building Code requirements.
7. Loading Facilities
Loading and unloading facilities shall be visually
screened from access streets and adjacent properties and
constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and
restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such
function. When screening of loading and unloading
facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be
architecturally integrated into the overall design of the
building. Loading and unloading areas adjacent to
alleys do not require additional visual screening.
8. Parking
Assembly uses with high parking demands may be
required to provide additional off-site street parking. In
making this determination, project features such as
project size, location (including proximity to other
assembly and restaurant uses), hours of operation, and
availability of nearby on or off-street parking resources
will be considered.
9. Railroad Turntable Site Preservation Incentives
As a part of the review and approval of a development
plan or conditional use permit involving the historic
railroad turntable site located between Pujol Street and
Murrieta Creek and north of Main Street as identified in
Exhibit IV-2, in consideration of preservation and/or
restoration of the railroad turntable site the Planning
Commission may consider the following development
standard concessions:
a. A modification to the setback or required yard
provisions.
IV-103
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. An increase in the maximum allowable building
height.
c. A reduction in the amount of required on-site
parking.
The Planning Commission may also consider an
increase in the target residential density for the site as
identified in Exhibit IV-2 of this Specific Plan. The City
Engineer must determine that the project at the
increased density will not create unmitigable impacts on
the traffic circulation in the area or overburden the
utilities serving the area.
In considering whether proposed development standard
concessions are justified, a Certificate of Historical
Appropriateness shall be reviewed by the Old Town
Local Review Board with recommendations provided to
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission
shall determine that the project adequately preserves
and/or restores the railroad turntable site in accordance
with local history and provides access to the public so
that this cultural resource provides a benefit to the
community and visitors to Old Town.
IV-104
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
10. Civic District Land Use and Development
Standards
Structures within the Civic District are intended to be
civic structures and shall be constructed based upon the
development and architectural standards necessary for
public or quasi-public uses including but not limited to
parks, government offices, police/fire stations, public
community centers, public museums, public libraries,
and similar civic facilities.
Public civic structures and facilities benefit businesses
and residents within the Temecula area and/or assist the
community through civic service. Public civic
structures within the Civic District are intended to be
unique to the existing character of the area and serve as
public focal points and are subject to design review
approval but not subject to the Urban Standards of the
Old Town Specific Plan. The City encourages
creativity in design of public civic structures and
facilities. Except for legal nonconforming structures,
private structures that accommodate non-civic uses
shall otherwise comply with the Land Use and
Development Standards of the Old Town Specific Plan.
IV-105
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. URBAN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(This page is left blank intentionally).
IV-106
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
H. CIRCULATION AND STREETSCAPE
STANDARDS
The Circulation and Streetscape Standards are intended
to provide clear design requirements for the future
configuration of the streets and sidewalks in Old Town.
The Circulation and Streetscape Standards also address
the proper placement of streetlights and other sidewalk
items such as trash receptacles, newspaper racks,
benches, utilities and other sidewalk furnishings in a
manner that maintains the clear flow of pedestrian
movement. The Circulation and Streetscape Standards
provide the vision for a vibrant, pedestrian-friendly,
walkable Old Town. The Streetscape and Circulation
Standards provide specific criteria for how this will be
achieved. All development in Old Town is required to
comply with the Old Town Circulation and Streetscape
Standards. As a result, it is anticipated that compliance
with all streetscape standards and the completion of
streetscape improvements will be accomplished
incrementally as part of the requirements and conditions
for development as it occurs in the future.
1. Old Town Sidewalk Standards
The sidewalks in Old Town are intended to establish the
pedestrian as the priority from curb to storefront. The
functionality of Old Town as a walkable downtown is
achieved through logical streetscape design and
compliance with uniform sidewalk standards.
Implementation of the sidewalk standards in Old Town
will result in the safety and comfort expected in a
pedestrian-oriented urban area.
a. Current Sidewalk Conditions
The existing sidewalk configuration in Old Town does
not currently accommodate the free-flowing movement
of pedestrians. The current configuration, illustrated in
Figure IV-57a (left, below) illustrates the six-inch wide
rolled curb, six-foot wide wooden boardwalk, and four-
foot wide landscape planter. Many buildings are located
10 feet from the landscape planter. Many other
buildings have an attached gallery that may abut the
property line. This inconsistent sidewalk configuration
does not allow for the free-flow of pedestrian
movement because the walking path is narrow and often
obstructed by trees and planters. This configuration also
obstructs the clear view of shop storefronts from the
sidewalk and creates barriers for pedestrians between
the sidewalk and business windows and entries.
b. Sidewalk Design Standards
The sidewalk design standards (discussed in greater
detail below) emphasize the importance of the
placement of buildings in relation to the sidewalk, street
and public realm. The appropriate sidewalk width and
configuration is essential in creating a walkable
environment in Old Town. Consequently, the sidewalk
design standards take a two-pronged approach to
sidewalk design: they outline requirements for the
property located within the public right-of-way and they
provide requirements for the space located on private
property between the property line and build-to line.
The area between the property line and the build-to line
is referred to as the “frontage zone.”
Figure VI-57a: Existing sidewalk configuration in Old
Town.
Public right
of way
Private Property
(“frontage zone”)
Figure IV-57b,c (above and right): Examples of
pedestrian oriented sidewalk configurations.
IV-107
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
In order to allow for the clear flow of pedestrians,
building facades in Old Town are required to be placed
10 feet behind the property line, on the build-to line.
This configuration provides a wider walking path for
pedestrian activity and movement. It also provides
consistency in building placement along the street
which further defines the streets and sidewalks. The
uniform way in which the buildings are configured in
Old Town also allows for sidewalk dining opportunities
without impeding pedestrian movement.
In order to maintain pedestrian oriented pathways on
the sidewalks in Old Town all development projects
will be required to comply with the following
requirements:
c. Required Sidewalk Configuration Between the
Property Line and the Build-to Line
i. The area between the property line and the build-to
line is required to be ten feet wide. This is known as the
“frontage zone.”
ii. Sidewalk cafes are only permitted to be placed within
the “frontage zone.” Sidewalk cafes may not exceed a
depth of ten feet including any fencing or barriers that
might be placed within this area. It is also encouraged
that sidewalk cafes be placed within building courtyards
or forecourts.
iii. Items such as street furniture, benches, newspaper
racks, trash receptacles, and potted plants may be
located in the “frontage zone,” but may not exceed 3
feet in depth.
iv. Built-in, at-grade landscape planters are not
permitted to be located within the “frontage zone,”
(except when a stoop or porch frontage is used). Potted
and hanging plants are permitted within the “frontage
zone” to soften the building façade subject to the
allowable encroachment requirements for the zone.
v. A flat, solid, paved surface is required in the
“frontage zone” between the property line and the
build-to line. This surface is required to be contiguous
and at the same grade as the adjacent sidewalk surface
located within the right of way.
Required
Figure IV-59: Required sidewalk configuration
Figure IV-58: Example of pedestrian oriented sidewalk
configuration that accommodates an outdoor dining
area and also provides an unobstructed walkway for
pedestrians.
IV-108
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Sidewalk Cross Sections
In order to achieve adequate sidewalk width to
accommodate pedestrian movement, all development
projects in Old Town shall be required to comply with
the sidewalk cross sections show in Figures IV-60 and
IV-61, and shall meet the following requirements:
i. Building facades facing the street in Old Town shall
be placed on the build-to line, 10 feet behind the
property line, in order to accommodate the pedestrian
path-of-travel.
ii. For buildings that do not propose an arcade, a 6-inch
rolled curb, 4-foot wide furnishing zone, and 5.5-foot
pedestrian zone, totaling 10 feet, is required. An
additional 10 feet of sidewalk is also provided by
placing the building on the build-to line (10 feet behind
the property line), as shown in Figure IV-60.
iii. For buildings that have an optional arcade element, a
6-inch rolled-curb, 4-foot wide furnishing zone, and a
5.5 foot pedestrian zone, totaling ten feet, is required.
An additional 10 feet of sidewalk width is provided by
placing the building on the build-to line (10 feet behind
from the property line), and allowing for the second
story arcade to extend beyond the build-to line to the
property line, as shown in Figure IV-61.
iv. Sidewalk furnishings, such as benches, newspaper
racks, utilities, potted/hanging plants and light fixtures
are required to comply with the established Sidewalk
Zones (Figure IV-63) discussed in greater detail in the
following section.
Figure IV- 60: Required
sidewalk cross section -
building without an arcade
or gallery element.
Figure IV-61: Required
sidewalk cross section -
building with an optional
arcade or gallery element.
IV-109
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-62: Example of stamped concrete
installed to simulate a wooden plank boardwalk.
e. Removal of Wooden Boardwalk
As development continues to occur in the Old Town
area and the new sidewalk configuration is phased-in,
as illustrated in the cross sections above, the existing
wooden boardwalk material will also be phased out
over time. In order to ensure that the wooden boardwalk
is phased out over time the following shall be required:
• All development in Old Town along Old Town
Front Street will be required to install “faux-
wood” stamped concrete sidewalks in place of
the wooden boardwalk material as specified by
the Director of Public Works.
• The required color of the stamped concrete
boardwalk shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Public Works and specified on
the street improvement plans.
IV-110
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
f. Establishment of Sidewalk Zones in Old Town
The sidewalks in Old Town are split into four separate
zones in order to maintain an unobstructed pedestrian
path of travel. The four zones are illustrated in Figure
IV-63 and are described in greater detail below:
i. Curb zone
Zone 1 is the “curb zone”. This provides a small buffer
between the street and sidewalk and also defines the
edge of the pedestrian zone in relationship to the street.
The standards for the “curb zone” are as follows:
• Typically, the “curb zone” consists of the 6”
curb that is required to be constructed adjacent
to the street.
• Where pedestrian/freight loading and
unloading will not occur the “curb zone” shall
be a minimum of 6 inches wide.
IV-111
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ii. Street furnishing zone
Zone 2 is the “street furnishing zone.” The “street
furnishing zone” is intended to provide a linear and
uniform space for street fixtures such as street lights,
street signs, and parking meters. It is also intended to
provide an extension of the “curb zone” where
vehicular loading and unloading of passengers from the
street will occur. Street trees are also required to be
placed in the furnishings zone. Although placement of
utility equipment off the street/sidewalk right-of-way to
the greatest extent possible is preferred, in some cases
utility equipment (with the exception of double detector
checks) may be placed in this zone. The standards for
the “street furnishings zone” are as follows:
• All street fixtures such as but not limited to,
street lights, street trees, street signs, parking
meters, are required to be placed in the “street
furnishing zone.”
• All street fixtures shall be set back a minimum
of 12 inches from the “curb zone” adjacent to
the “street furnishing zone.”
• Typically the “street furnishing zone” is four
feet in width as consistent with the sidewalk
design standards for Old Town. However,
where the 5’ x 5’ street tree planters exist
along the sidewalk in Old Town it is
understood that the planters and tree grates
will overlap with the “pedestrian zone.”
• The “street furnishing zone” shall have a 12”
wide “step-off” area adjacent to the “curb
zone” to accommodate for the loading and
unloading of passengers from vehicles parked
along the street or freight.
Figure IV-65: Street
furnishings such as street
trees, street signs and
street lights are required to
be placed in the “street
furnishing zone.”
Figure IV-64: Example of
required placement of street
furnishings consistent with the
established Sidewalk Zones in
Old. Town.
Frontage Zone Pedestrian Zone Street Furnishing Zone Curb Zone
IV-112
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
iii. Pedestrian zone
Zone 3 is the “pedestrian zone.” This zone is located
between the “street furnishing zone” and the “frontage
zone” and serves as the area that is dedicated to
pedestrian movement. The following standards shall be
met for the “pedestrian zone”:
• The “pedestrian zone” is required to remain
free of all fixtures and unobstructed in order to
provide comfortable pedestrian movement.
• Typically this zone includes the entire 5.5-foot
wide walkway area located within the right-of-
way between the street furnishings zone and
the property line.
iv. Frontage zone
Zone 4 is the “frontage zone.” The frontage zone is
located immediately adjacent to the building façade and
is intended to provide for the linear and uniform
placement of various items such as street furniture,
benches, tables and chairs, newspaper racks, trash
receptacles, and potted plants. The “frontage zone” is
also intended to accommodate outdoor sidewalk cafes
without impeding pedestrian travel. The following
standards shall be met for the “frontage zone:”
• The maximum depth of the frontage zone is 10
feet. Between 18 to 36 inches wide (36”
maximum) of this zone may be utilized to
accommodate various items such as but not
limited to newspaper racks, benches, trash
receptacles and potted plants.
• Up to 10 feet of the “frontage zone” may be
utilized to accommodate sidewalk cafes or
outdoor dining areas in the Downtown Core
and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use zoning
districts.
• Sidewalk cafés are only permitted to be placed
within the “frontage zone.”
IV-113
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
g. Typical Sidewalk Zone Widths
Table IV-33 provides the typical sidewalk zone widths
when an outdoor dining area or sidewalk café is placed
within the “frontage zone.” Table IV-33 also provides
the typical sidewalk zone widths for a retail oriented
business/tenant. Sidewalk cafes/outdoor dining areas
shall also comply with the requirements in the
Supplemental Standards contained in Section G of this
chapter, and the Outdoor Dining/Sidewalk Café Design
Guidelines contained in Section V.G.
Table IV-33 Typical Sidewalk Zone Widths
Streetscape Type Curb Zone Furnishings Zone Pedestrian Through
Zone
Frontage Zone
Outdoor Dining or
Sidewalk Cafe Option
6” 4’ 5.5’ 10’
Retail Oriented 6” 4’ 12.5’ 3’
Figure IV-66: Typical sidewalk zone widths for the café oriented option. Figure IV-67: Typical sidewalk zone widths for the retail oriented option.
IV-114
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Old Town Street Standards
The purposeful design and pedestrian-friendly
configuration of streets play a key role in the
walkability of Old Town. Narrow lane widths, street
trees and street furniture, curb adjacent parking, short
blocks, curb bulb-outs, speed tables, and clearly marked
pedestrian crossings all contribute to a pleasant
pedestrian experience along the street. The design of
pedestrian friendly streets in Old Town will contribute
to the look, feel and function of the public realm. Well
designed streets and sidewalks create a sense of safety
and comfort for pedestrians. Street trees provide shade
and comfort along the streets and street furniture
provides a resting place for those exploring Old Town
by foot. Clearly marked pedestrian crossings provide a
visual queue to traffic and indicate where pedestrians
are intended to cross, adding to the walkabilty of the
streets.
a. Typical Street Cross Sections:
The following section provides the existing street cross
sections (typical) and the recommended street cross
sections (typical) for the following streets in Old Town:
• Old Town Front Street (between Moreno
Road- south loop and Moreno Road – north
loop)
• Old Town Front Street (north of Main Street)
• Old Town Front Street (near Santiago Road)
• Mercedes Street (north of the Civic Center)
• Pujol Street
• Main Street (typical for all east/west running
streets along Old Town Front from First Street
to Sixth Street, except Third and Fifth Street
west of Old Town Front Street)
• Termination of Fifth Street and Third Street
b. Moreno Road (north and south loop) Cross
Sections:
The following section also includes the existing street
cross sections (typical) for Moreno Road (north and
south loop). In addition to the typical cross sections for
these road segments, two recommended alternative
street cross sections are provided. Alternative 1 retains
the existing right-of-way at 88 feet for Moreno Road
(north loop) and 74 feet for Moreno Road (south loop).
45 degree pull in parking spaces are provided along the
street in Alternative 1. Alternative 2 reduces the right-
of-way to 60 feet for Moreno Road (north and south
loop) and provides parallel parking along the street.
IV-115
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-68:
Existing street cross
section (typical) for
Old Town Front
Street between the
north and south loop
of Moreno Road.
Figure IV-69:
Recommended
street cross section
(typical) for Old
Town Front Street
between the north
and south loop of
Moreno Road.
Note: West side of the
street adjacent to
Murrieta Creek trail is
not within the Old
Town Specific Plan
boundary.
Note: West side of
the street adjacent to
Murrieta Creek trail
is not within the Old
Town Specific Plan
boundary.
IV-116
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-71:
Recommended
street cross section
(typical) for Old
Town Front Street
north of Main
Street.
Figure IV-70:
Existing street
cross section
(typical) for Old
Town Front
Street north of
Main Street.
IV-117
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-73:
Recommended
typical street
cross section for
Old Town Front
Street near
Santiago Road.
Figure IV-72:
Existing typical
street cross
section for Old
Town Front
Street near
Santiago Road.
IV-118
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-75:
Recommended
street cross
section (typical)
for Mercedes
Street.
Figure IV-74:
Existing street
cross section
(typical) for
Mercedes
Street.
IV-119
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-77:
Recommended
street cross
section (typical)
for Pujol Street.
Figure IV-76:
Existing street
cross section
(typical) for
Pujol Street.
IV-120
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-78: Existing
street cross section
(typical) for Main Street.
Note: This cross section
is typical for all east/west
bound streets along Old
Town Front from First
Street to Sixth Street, with
the exception of the
segment of Third and
Fifth Street west of Old
Town Front Street.
Figure IV-79:
Recommended street
cross section (typical) for
Main Street. Typical for
all east/west running
streets along Old Town
Front from First Street to
Sixth Street, except Third
and Fifth Street west of
Old Town Front Street.
IV-121
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-80: Existing
street cross section
(typical) for Third and
Fifth Street (west of Old
Town Front Street).
Figure IV-81:
Recommended street
cross section (typical) for
Third and Fifth Street
(west of Old Town Front
Street).
IV-122
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-82: Existing
street cross section for
Moreno Road (north
loop).
IV-123
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-83:
Recommended
Alternative 1 street cross
section (typical) for
Moreno Road (north
loop). Alternative 1
retains existing 88 foot
right-of-way width.
Figure IV-84:
Recommended
Alternative 2 street cross
section (typical) for
Moreno Road (north
loop). Alternative 2
proposes 60 foot right-of-
way width.
450 Angled
Parking
450 Angled
Parking
Typical
Parallel
Parking
Typical
Parallel
Parking
IV-124
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-85: Existing
street cross section for
Moreno Road (south
loop).
IV-125
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-86:
Recommended
Alternative 1 street cross
section (typical) for
Moreno Road (south
loop). Alternative 1
retains existing 74 foot
right-of-way width.
Figure IV-87:
Recommended
Alternative 2 street cross
section (typical) for
Moreno Road (south
loop). Alternative 2
proposes 60-foot right-of-
way width.
450 Angled
Parking
450 Angled
Parking
IV-126
Typical
Parallel
Parking
Typical
Parallel
Parking
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Termination of Third and Fifth Street Adjacent to
Murrieta Creek
As illustrated in Figures IV-86 and IV-87 the
termination of Third Street and Fifth Street at Murrieta
Creek is not currently intended to allow for through
vehicular traffic. Although vehicular access is
terminated, the sidewalks along Third Street and Fifth
Street are required to continue to provide a contiguous
pedestrian pathway and safe access to the creek walk
trail and the pedestrian bridge connections. Requiring
sufficient connections that adjoin the existing sidewalk
circulation system to the future trail system along
Murrieta Creek will encourage pedestrian activity along
the creek and throughout the Old Town area. The
improvements and use of these right-of-way areas
present potential opportunities for the installation of
outdoor dining areas, pocket parks, passive pedestrian
open-spaces, public art displays, and designated wildlife
viewing areas adjacent to the creek. The City intends to
retain the existing right-of-way at the termination of
Third Street and Fifth Street, however the improvement
and use of these areas may be allowed with a revocable
encroachment permit. The issuance of an encroachment
permit for these right-of-way areas shall be reviewed
for compliance with the connectivity and open space
objectives discussed above.
Figure IV-86: Conceptual sketch of the termination of
the west side of Third Street.
IV-127
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-87: Concept sketch of the termination of Fifth Street at Murrieta Creek. The termination of Fifth Street
adjacent to the Murrieta Creek will abut the future trail and creek walk that is anticipated to develop as part of the
Murrieta Creek Improvement Project.
Encroachment areas at 3rd Street and 5th Street
provide opportunities for the installation of
outdoor dining areas, pocket parks, passive
pedestrian open-spaces, public art displays and
designated wildlife viewing areas adjacent to
the creek.
IV-128
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Exhibit IV-88:
Site plan view of the
conceptual design of
the termination of
Third Street and Fifth
Street (west of Old
Town Front Street).
IV-129
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
3. Traffic Calming Measures
Traffic calming utilizes a number of street and sidewalk
design strategies that are intended to slow vehicular
movement and also increase the visibility of those
walking along the streets and sidewalks in Old Town. In
order to maintain a walkable environment in Old Town
and provide a safe pedestrian environment a number of
traffic calming measures have been identified:
• Curb Bulb-outs
• Speed Tables/Raised Crosswalk
• Designated/Marked Crosswalks
• Roundabouts
• Curb Adjacent Parking
These traffic calming measures are discussed in detail
in the following section. The appropriate application,
location and timing of the construction and installation
of these traffic calming measures shall be determined
by the City’s Traffic Engineer.
IV-130
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Curb Bulb-outs
Curb bulb-outs, also referred to as chokers, are circular
extensions of the sidewalk that encroach into the street.
Curb bulb-outs are effective traffic calming measures
because they physically narrow the vehicular travel lane
and turning vehicles at intersections where pedestrians
are expected to cross. As a result, the driver perceives a
narrower drive lane and slows down. This makes
intersections narrower and easier to cross on foot,
resulting in pedestrian friendly streets, sidewalks and
crosswalks. Curb bulb-outs also act as an enclosure for
on-street parking.
Most of the intersections along Old Town Front Street
have existing curb bulb-outs, with the exception of the
intersections at Moreno Road (north and south loop)
and Old Town Front Street, the northeast corner of
Sixth Street and Old Town Front Street, the northwest
and southwest corners of Fourth Street and Old Town
Front Street, the northwest and southwest corner of
Second Street and Old Town Front Street, and the
intersection of First Street and Old Town Front Street.
The existing curb bulb-outs are intended to be retained
in Old Town in the future as an existing traffic calming
measure.
Figure IV- 89:
Typical intersection
with curb bulb-outs.
Typical Old Town Front Street
ramp/pedestrian crossing locations
include curb bulb-outs to shorten the
distance of the pedestrian crosswalk,
to slow passing vehicular traffic and
maintain a safe environment for those
exploring Old Town by foot.
Figure IV-90: Curb bulb-out at the intersection of Front Street
and Main Street.
Figure IV-91: Curb bulb-out at Old Town Front
Street and Main Street. Curb bulb-outs provide a
distinct ending point for on-street parking.
IV-131
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Speed Tables and Raised Crosswalk
Speed tables and raised crosswalks provide a designated
area for pedestrians to cross, thereby encouraging
pedestrians to cross only at desired locations. Speed
tables and raised crosswalks also slightly elevate the
pedestrian in the crosswalk, increasing the visibility of
the person crossing the street.
Currently the intersections in Old Town do not have
speed tables or raised crosswalks. Based upon a traffic
calming study that was conducted by Fehr and Peers
(February 2010), speed tables and raised crosswalks can
provide dedicated locations for pedestrians to cross and
also address vehicular speed issues in Old Town. Speed
tables and raised crosswalks are a recommended traffic
calming techniques that can be applied in Old Town.
However, it is important that the installation of the
speed tables and raised crosswalks in Old Town be
coordinated with the intersections that currently have
curb bulb-outs because the application of this approach
is likely to require the removal of the curb bulb-outs
and the installation of bollards at the more traditional
intersection radii.
Furthermore, aesthetic impacts should also be
considered due to the fact that speed tables and raised
intersections often require special striping and signage
to make drivers aware of the elevation change.
Additionally, construction materials should be selected
to enhance the streetscape. The use of special pavers or
a change in color and/or texture is recommended.
Figures IV-92a,b: Example of Speed Table (above) and
Raised Crosswalk (below).
c. Designated/Marked Crosswalks
Currently the streets in Old Town do not have
designated crosswalk striping or other indicators that
would direct pedestrians to cross at appropriate
locations. Based upon a traffic calming study that was
conducted by Fehr and Peers (February 2010),
designated cross walks have several advantages
including providing clear pedestrian crossings at
intersections for increased safety and providing a
pleasant aesthetic ambiance along the streets.
Additionally, marked crosswalks can be implemented in
Old Town without any modifications to the existing
bulb out configurations. Considering the advantages of
this measure, designated crosswalks should be
implemented in Old Town as a traffic calming and
pedestrian safety measure.
This strategy could be implemented through a variety of
measures including the marking or striping of
crosswalks. Since Old Town is intended to be a unique
area within Temecula the use of colored pavement,
special pavers or textures should be used to designate
the cross walks in Old Town. The application of marked
crosswalks should be implemented along all major
intersections along Old Town Front Street and
Mercedes Street. Additionally, marked crosswalks
should also be employed at any intersections in Old
Town that anticipate or experience heavy pedestrian
crossing, such as crossing areas proximate to the Civic
Center.
Figure IV-93:
Example of a crosswalk that has been marked with
decorative colored pavers. Marked crosswalks provide a
clear pedestrian crossing and add to an aesthetically
pleasing streetscape.
IV-132
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Roundabouts
A roundabout is a circular intersection where vehicles
travel around a raised central island in a counter
clockwise direction. Advantages of a roundabout
include reducing vehicular conflict points, achieving
greater safety due to slower vehicular travel speeds, the
elimination of left hand turns, and enhanced aesthetics
by providing an area that can accommodate decorative
landscape treatments. Based upon need, as determined
by future Traffic Impact Analyses, the installation of
roundabouts at the north and south entrances of Old
Town may be constructed in the future as a traffic
calming mitigation measure. The need for these
potential roundabouts and the timing of construction for
the roundabout improvements in Old Town shall be
determined by through future Traffic Impact Analyses.
Figure IV-94 a: Example of a roundabout
IV-133
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4. Old Town Street Tree Standards
The placement of urban street trees in Old Town are
expected to soften the streets and sidewalks, create a
more comfortable walking environment, and provide
human connection to nature. Street trees add color and
interest to the streets, provide shade, improve storm
water and air quality, and reduce greenhouse gas.
a. Existing Conditions
The existing placement of street trees in Old Town are
not uniform and often create a physical barrier between
pedestrians and the adjacent storefronts. Figure IV-95
shows an example of the existing tree placement in Old
Town. The trees are planted too close to the building
and the branches conflict with building frontage and
block the view of storefront windows from the
pedestrian path of travel.
Figure IV-95: Typical existing
configuration of street trees in
Old Town, trees are directly
adjacent to the building facade
and often obstruct the pedestrian
pathway.
Figure IV-96: Typical existing
sidewalk and street tree
configuration in Old Town.
IV-134
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Required Street Tree Design Standards
The uniform and linear placement of street trees in Old
Town will occur as development continues to occur
over time. The Figure IV-97 a, b illustrates examples of
consistent street tree placement in an urban
environment. The street trees are consistently planted
next to the curb with tree grates placed over the tree
wells to allow for a clear pedestrian pathway.
Figure IV-97a,b: Required street
tree placement in a uniform and
linear configuration adjacent to
the street.
IV-135
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Street Tree Placement
In order to ensure that the way in which trees are placed
in Old Town contribute the creation of a vibrant
pedestrian oriented environment, the placement of street
trees and landscaping in Old Town shall meet the
following requirements:
i. Street trees shall be placed in the “street furnishings
zone” within 5 x 5 foot tree grates.
ii. Trees shall be placed approximately 30 feet apart.
iii. To achieve a consistent streetscape informal or
random tree spacing shall be avoided.
iv. Street tree placement shall be coordinated with the
placement of street lighting and other items that may
conflict with the placement and growth of street trees.
v. Trees shall “mirror” each other on both sides of the
street.
vi. Street trees shall be uniformly integrated into the
sidewalk design by being placed adjacent to the curb.
Trees shall be maintained and manicured as to not block
the view of shop fronts along the pedestrian path of
travel.
vii. All street trees shall comply with the approved
street tree list and Street Tree Exhibit IV-3 contained
herein.
viii. All street trees shall be placed within a 5 x 5 foot
tree well.
ix. All tree wells are required to abut the curb.
xi. Root barriers shall be installed for all street trees.
x. All tree wells are required to be covered by the
approved tree grate for Old Town to create a smooth
sidewalk surface. Details related to the approved tree
grates for Old Town are shown in Figure IV-100.
Figure IV-98a
Figure IV-98b
Figure IV-98a: Illustrates the
existing placement of street
trees in Old Town.
Figure 98b: Illustrates the
required placement of street
trees within the 4-foot wide
“furnishings zone,” which is
expected to occur as develop
continues within the Old Town
area.
IV-136
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Example - Conceptual Street Tree Plan
Below is a conceptual street tree plan for the southeast
corner Old Town Front Street/Fifth Street. As illustrated
in Figure IV-99, the street trees are planted adjacent to
curb, and the tree wells are covered with tree grates
allowing for a clear path of travel. This configuration
also allows for sidewalk dining located between
property line and build-to line. This conceptual street
tree plan is anticipated to be replicated throughout Old
Town.
Figure IV-99: Conceptual drawings of street with curb
adjacent street trees.
e. Tree Grate Specifications
i. All tree wells are required to be covered with a tree
grate.
ii. All tree grates in Old Town shall be 5’ x 5’, uniform
in color, size and style and shall be installed in
accordance with the City standard:
• Size: 5’ x 5’
• Color: Natural (rusted) Finish
Figure IV-100: Required street tree grate.
IV-137
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
f. Street Tree Landscape Palette
In order to achieve an urban streetscape, the following
tree species (listed below and shown on the Street Tree
Map Exhibit IV-3) shall be required to be planted in
Old Town. All street trees shall be 36” box size:
Old Town Front Street:
Liquid Amber (Liquidambar Styraciflua ‘Rotundiloba’)
First Street (east of Old Town Front Street):
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Second Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Third Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Fourth Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Fifth Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Sixth Street (east of Old Town Front Street):
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Main Street east of Murrieta Creek:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Main Street west of Murrieta Creek:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Mercedes Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Moreno Road:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Pujol Street:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
First Street (west of Old Town Front Street):
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Sixth Street (west of Old Town Front Street):
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Felix Valdez:
London Plane (Plantus x Acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’)
Murrieta Creek Trail:
California Sycamore (Platanus Racemosa)
Figure IV-101: Liquid Amber Figure IV-102: London Plane
IV-138
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV-103: California Sycamore Figure IV-104: Chinese Elm
IV-139
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
IV-128
IV-140
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
5. Old Town Mobility Concept
In order to achieve Old Town’s Mobility and
Transportation goal, discussed in Chapter II of this
Specific Plan, a conceptual Old Town Mobility Plan has
been developed to help implement connectivity in Old
Town. The Old Town Mobility Concept focuses on
pedestrian connections along the streets and alleys and
along the Murrieta Creek Trail. The goal is to provide
pedestrian connectivity and pathways throughout Old
Town and link transit stops, designated bike routes and
points of interest in Old Town resulting in a more
walkable interconnected multi-modal transportation
network in Old Town. All projects in Old Town should
be designed to provide pedestrian connections to the
larger multi-modal network to the greatest extent
possible.
The Old Town Mobility Concept Map is intended to
provide a visual depiction of the interconnected multi-
modal transportation network that will develop
overtime and promote walkability, connectivity and
mobility in Old Town. Ultimately, this concept will
allow Old Town to develop as envisioned in the future
into a pedestrian friendly, walkable downtown
destination. The map is show in Exhibit IV-4.
a. Street Improvements
In order to accommodate vehicular movement in Old
Town the following street connections are proposed as a
part of the Old Town Mobility Concept:
• An extension of Pujol Street to the south of the
Old Town area to provide a vehicular
connection to Old Town Front Street, Highway
79/Temecula Parkway and Interstate-15.
• Interchange improvements along Interstate-15
(south bound ramps) at Highway 79/Temecula
Parkway.
• Construction of the Western Bypass along the
westerly boundary of the project site.
• Sixth Street extension to the west of Old Town
Front Street, across Murrieta Creek and to the
Western Bypass.
• Main Street extension to connect to the
Western Bypass.
• First Street extension to connect to the
Western Bypass.
• Vincent Moraga extension to connect to the
Western Bypass.
• Intersection enhancements at Old Town Front
Street and First Street.
i. Roundabout Improvements
In addition to the street improvements listed above,
based on need as determined by future Traffic Impact
Analyses, two future roundabouts may be constructed at
the north and south ends of Old Town to accommodate
vehicular movement.
b. Pedestrian Connections/Pedestrian Bridges
The following pedestrian connections are proposed as a
part of the Conceptual Old Town Mobility Plan:
• Construct an additional pedestrian-only bridge
crossing over Murrieta Creek at the
termination of Third Street to provide an
additional connection from the Downtown
Core to the Neighborhood Residential District.
• Construct a pedestrian-only bridge from Old
Town at Sixth Street across Interstate-15
freeway to connect Old Town’s Downtown
Core to the residential neighborhood located
east of Interstate-15.
• Ensure pedestrian access along the westerly
expansions of Sixth Street, Main Street, and
First Street, to the Western Bypass.
IV-141
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Transit Stops
Currently Old Town is served by the Riverside Transit
Agency by existing local transit and shuttle service.
There are four existing transit stops in Old Town:
• Old Town Front Street near Moreno Road
• Sixth Street Transit Stop
• Second Street Transit Stop
• Pujol Street Transit Stop
d. Multi-Use Trails
As part of the Murrieta Creek improvement project a
multi-use trail will be constructed adjacent to Murrieta
Creek. This trail will connect with the sidewalks and
streets in Old Town and provide a connection between
the Neighborhood Residential District to the Downtown
Core and Residential/Limited Mixed-Use District.
IV-142
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
IV-143
City of Temecula- Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(This page is left blank intentionally).
IV-144
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
I. ALLEY STANDARDS
The alleys in Old Town were created with the original
historical plat and subdivision that was established in
the 1880s. Since this time many of the original alleys
have been eliminated. However, as part of the
revitalization efforts in Old Town, the remaining alleys
are intended to be preserved and integrated as a part of
the overall circulation network and protected for public
use.
The Old Town Alley Standards are intended to provide
clear requirements for the configuration of alleys in Old
Town. All alleys in Old Town are intended to be urban
in design and in function. They are anticipated to be
used as unobstructed vehicular access ways in Old
Town and as a means to provide access to rear service
areas and parking lots. The alleys are also intended to
enhance pedestrian connectivity and walkability in Old
Town.
The Alley Standards contained herein address the
required width of public alleyways in Old Town, and
the construction methods and paving surface standards
that are required to be installed in the public alleyways.
The standards also discuss how the public alleyways are
required to function in relationship to placement of
utility equipment such as water lines, electrical lines,
trash collection areas, transformers, double detector
checks, post indicator valves and gas meters. The Alley
Standards also provide requirements for private
residential and commercial alleyways that might be
created as a part of the site layout of a private
development project. The Alley Standards are intended
to be supplemented by the Alley Design Guidelines and
Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines which are
discussed in Section V.J and Section V.K of this
Specific Plan.
Exhibit IV-105:
1884 Original Plat of Temecula
created the historical grid pattern
of streets and alleys.
IV-145
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. Public Alley Cross Section and Construction
Requirements
Designated alleys within Old Town shall be maintained
and protected for future use. The design components
within each alley shall be consistent with the cross
sections shown herein.
The standard cross sections for all public alleys in Old
Town are shown in Figure IV-106 and Figure IV-107.
All public alleyways in Old Town shall be constructed
and installed according to this typical alley cross section
standard. They shall also comply with the following
standards:
a. Development projects adjacent to a public alley will
be required to construct improvements in and adjacent
to the alley. The improvements may include paving,
lighting, or other necessary components to ensure the
functionality and safety of the alley.
b. All public alleys in Old Town shall be 20 feet in
width (10 feet on either side of the alley centerline).
c. All public alleys in Old Town shall include a
concrete ribbon gutter in the center of the alley. The
concrete ribbon gutter shall be 4 feet wide (2 feet on
either side of the alley centerline).
d. The public alleys shall drain toward the centerline. A
maximum 2% grade shall be provided within the public
alley to ensure proper drainage.
Figure IV-106:
Typical Public Alley Cross Section
IV-146
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. All alleys in Old Town shall include a 16-foot wide
segment (8 feet on either side of the alley center line)
constructed of asphalt concrete pavement (a.c.
pavement). The a.c. pavement is to be installed on
either side of the 4 foot wide concrete ribbon gutter.
f. There shall be no above ground utilities permitted to
be located within the 20 foot public alleyway.
g. Lighting shall be provided at a minimum of one
footcandle within all alleyways and a minimum two
footcandles at doorways that take access adjacent to the
alleyway.
h. The combined thickness of the base and surface
materials shall be determined by a soils test.
i. City of Temecula Public Words Department
Standards 113, 115 and 116 for pavement design
requirements and general notes shall also be required.
j. All curb and gutter shall be Type “A-6” unless
otherwise specified.
k. A 2” x 6” sized redwood header shall be installed as
consistent with the public alley cross section standard.
l. All public alleys in Old Town shall be constructed in
compliance with the Common Alley Drive Approach
design shown in Figure IV-108.
Figure III-X.
Public Alley Typical Driveway Approach
Figure IV-107:
Common Alley
Drive Approach
Figure IV-108:
Isometric View
IV-147
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Utilities
i. There shall be no above ground utilities permitted to
be located within the 20-foot public alleyway.
ii. There shall be no landscaping within the 20-foot
public alleyway, however landscaping may be provided
along the building façade adjacent to an alley on private
property.
iii. Utilities shall be placed underground within the
public alleyways in Old Town unless proven infeasible
by the utility provider.
iv. Utilities shall be placed in compliance with the
Utility and Infrastructure Design Guidelines contained
in Section V.K of this Specific Plan.
v. Above ground utilities shall be placed on private
property adjacent to the public alleyway within parking
areas, landscape planters, building “notch outs,” or
utility rooms as to not encroach or obstruct the required
20-foot public alleyway.
vi. All required utility easements shall be obtained and
recorded as a condition of approval for development.
vii. Buildings that are constructed adjacent to the public
alleyways in Old Town shall be designed to
accommodate trash pickup from the public alleyways
whenever feasible. The location of trash enclosures
shall be considered in a building’s design in order to
accommodate adequate access for waste disposal
trucks.
viii. The construction of a concrete stress pad shall be
required within an alleyway when the location of the
trash enclosure dictates that trash trucks access the
alleyway on a regular basis.
Figure IV-109: Example of an urban alley.
IV-148
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
2. Private Residential and Commercial Alleyways
The creation of alleyways on private property for both
commercial and residential projects may help achieve
the urban environment that is envisioned for the Old
Town area. Site layouts that include alley loaded
garages or parking areas that are accessed from behind
a building façade and away from the street will find that
the inclusion of private alleyways as a part of their
project design is consistent with the development
standards required for Old Town. Private alleyways can
also be designed as a part of a development project to
meet water quality management and stormwater
requirements. The following requirements shall be met
for private alleyways in Old Town:
a. Private alleys shall meet minimum fire lane widths.
b. Private alleyways shall be designed to accommodate
utility equipment.
c. Access to parking areas is encouraged to be taken
from private alleyways that are designed as a part of a
development project.
d. Private alleyways shall include decorative paving
treatments and help achieve water quality management
requirements.
e. Private alleyways shall be designed to provide
vehicular and pedestrian connectivity to the public
streets in Old Town. Private alleyways may be designed
to accommodate pedestrian access and movement only.
This is encouraged when a pedestrian access through a
private alleyway will increase pedestrian mobility and
connectivity on Old Town.
f. Private alleyways shall incorporate landscaping, shall
be well lit and designed in a manner that is inviting to
pedestrians.
g. The creation and location of private alleyways in Old
Town shall be coordinated with adjoining property
owners, when possible.
3. Preservation of Existing Alleys in Old Town
As Old Town continues to develop, the following
alleys, as shown on Exhibit IV-4, will be retained and
preserved:
• Alley between First Street and Second Street
• Alley between Third Street and Main Street
• Alley between Fourth Street and Fifth Street
• Alley between Fifth Street and Sixth Street
• Alley between Fourth Street and Fifth Street
on the west side of Old Town Front Street
Figure IV-110: Example of a private residential
alley with alley loaded garages.
IV-149
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
IV-149
IV-150
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
J. SIGNS
1. Objective Signs are used to establish identities of tenants, to contribute to a lively visual atmosphere, and to give clear functional information. a. Signs should be simple, clear, and consistent with the intended small town urban character. b. Signs should be attractively designed and contribute to the historic character of the area. c. Signs should not compete with each other or dominate the setting by inconsistent height, size, shape, number, color, or lighting.
2. Architectural Compatibility
a. Signs should not obscure or cover architectural elements or decorative features of the building. A building’s architectural style and overall proportions should guide the design and placement of signs and the sign types selected for each business. The size and shape of a sign should be proportionate with the scale of the structure and/or architectural feature on which the sign is placed.
b. Signs should be placed in a manner that is consistent
with the proportion and scale of architectural elements
on the building facade.
c. Signs may be placed on different areas of the
building facade dependent upon the architectural
features and available sign placement area. However, it
is preferred that all signs are placed in a manner that
establishes or continues facade rhythm.
3. Colors
a. Sign colors should be compatible with the building’s
color palette while providing sufficient contrast to
enhance the visibility of the signs on the building
façade.
b. Awning colors should be compatible with the
building’s color palette and architectural style.
c. Gold-leaf window signs should provide an attractive
appearance.
Figures IV-111 a,b,c,d & e: Examples of various signage types.
IV-151
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4. Materials and Construction
a. Appropriate sign materials include wood, faux wood,
or metal with painted, engraved or three-dimensional
letters, logos or ornamental figures (for silhouette or
figurative signs).
b. Awnings shall be made of canvas, nylon, or durable
fabric and may include painted or applied lettering.
Plastic or vinyl awnings are not appropriate.
c. As an alternative to a wall mounted sign, lettering
may be painted directly on the building facade.
d. The use of plastic on the exterior face of a sign is not
appropriate unless it is manufactured to appear like
wood or metal. Traditionally, sandblasted or wood
signs have been made from redwood or cedar.
However, synthetic wooden materials are acceptable
such as HDU (High Density Urethane) provided it is
constructed to create a wooden appearance. Ceramic or
stone accents are acceptable.
e.. Inlaid Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaics Signs are
encouraged to provide a creative sign option at business
entrances. Terrazzo is a mix of stone and aggregate
byproducts manufactured to create a polished marble-
style appearance and can be inlaid with designs
including business identification.
5. Lighting Considerations
a. Sensitivity to the mix of residential and commercial
uses should be considered. All lighting should be
arranged so it is directed at the signage and should not
shine on adjacent properties or impede the sight of
pedestrians, bicyclists or motorists.
b. The most appropriate lighting method for externally
illuminated signs is down-lit gooseneck lighting.
Fixtures shall be decorative with single or multiple
spotlights.
c. Internally illuminated signs shall be back-lit or halo
illuminated. Back-lit signboards with routed out letters,
emitting a white light are acceptable for certain sign
types.
Figures IV-112 a,b,c,d & e:
Examples of various signage types.
IV-152
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
6. Applicability
The regulations and criteria contained herein shall apply
to all signage within the Downtown Core and
Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay, Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use, and Civic Districts. The Neighborhood
Residential district shall comply with the residential
sign requirements contained in the Temecula Municipal
Code using the Design Criteria contained in the Old
Town Specific Plan. Photos contained in this chapter
are intended to provide visual or illustrative examples
and may not be representative of the actual allowable
dimensions of sign area.
7. Permit Required
Unless specifically stated in these regulations, a sign
permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving,
reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within
the Specific Plan area. All signs are subject to the
approval of the Director of Planning.
8. Sign Program
A Sign Program is required prior to obtaining a sign
permit for new or existing developments that propose to
erect or replace a permanent sign where any of the
following circumstances exist:
a. Whenever a building or center is greater than 100,000
square feet in total building area and has five or more
permanent signs.
b. Whenever the development contains a historic
structure.
c. Whenever a proposed permanent sign exceeds or
cannot comply with the standards required by this
chapter due to unique characteristics of the site or the
unique characteristics of the building façade upon
which the sign is placed.
9. Prohibitions
No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter,
move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or
sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done
contrary to, or in violation of, the provisions of these
sign regulations.
10. Prohibited Signs in Old Town
• Freestanding signs
• Roof mounted signs
• Animated, rotating, moving, emitting or flashing
signs
• Balloon signs
• Iridescent materials or day-glow/fluorescent colors
• Ambient air balloons
• Internally illuminated channel letters signs
• Internally illuminated can or cabinet signs
• Front facing exposed bulbs
• Window signs above the second story (except when
in compliance with Section IV.J.13.d).
• Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting- except
holiday decorations
• Formed plastic signs
• Paper signs affixed to the inside or outside of the
façade or window
• Exposed raceways
• Traffic sign replicas
• Multiple repetitive signs or repetitive use of words
or symbols as a sign element is not permitted
except for a single band of letters on the inside of a
glass storefront
• Any sign not permitted by this Specific Plan
• Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and
not expressly permitted in this Specific Plan
• Signs within the public right-of-way, unless
approved by the Public Works Director and
the Planning Director.
11. Temporary Banners
Temporary Banner signs in the Downtown Core, Downtown
Core/Hotel Overlay, Residential/Limited Use, Neighborhood
Residential and Open Space shall be non-illuminated and
shall comply with the Temecula Municipal Code, except the
following:
a. Temporary Banner signs shall not exceed 32 sq. ft.
b. Neon colored or day glow signs are prohibited.
c. Temporary Banner signs may be attached to banisters
or other elements of the building or site.
d. Temporary Banner signs in the Civic Zone are intended to
benefit businesses within Old Town and the Community
through special events that attract residents and tourists to Old
Town and Temecula. Design and duration of temporary
signage placed in the Civic District (CV) may vary or exceed
the limitations of the other Districts as needed to support
community events, City sponsored signature events, or civic
activities within Old Town.
IV-153
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Figure IV114b: Example of appropriate sign placement that respects the architectural scale of the façade. The signage fits entirely within the horizontal and vertical elements of the building.
Figure IV-114a: Example of inappropriate sign placement. Sign placement ignores the architectural scale of the façade and obscures the horizontal and vertical elements of the building.
12. Temporary Portable Sign a. One temporary portable sign (such as an A-frame or a movable pole sign) is allowed per business. b. Portable signs may encroach 4 feet into the “Frontage Zone” and shall be placed at the primary entryway of the business. A portable sign shall not extend within the public right-of-way or block the free movement of pedestrians. c. The size shall not exceed four feet high and three feet wide. d. A portable sign shall not be placed within the Pedestrian Zone. e. Portable signs shall not be illuminated or plastic. Portable signs shall be constructed of high quality, durable materials, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Planning. f. A portable sign is intended for daily restaurant or store specials and shall be entirely removed and placed inside the building during non-business hours. g. No permit is required for portable signs that comply with these provisions.
13. Sign Placement
a. Except as provided below, signs shall be placed on
the building facade above the primary public entrance
for the business.
b. Tenant wall signs shall be placed no higher than the
lowest of the following points on the building facade:
i. 25 feet above grade
ii. Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows
iii. Cornice line/signage band on the first floor of the
building
c. Signs shall be placed in harmony with the
architecture and façade of the building.
d. The following signs may be located above the first
floor, provided they are not internally illuminated:
i. Building Name Signs that are painted, etched, or
applied directly to the wall with three dimensional
channel cut letters not to project more than 2 inches
from the surface.
ii. Window Signs (gold leaf and/or black colored);
however, not above the second floor and only one window
per frontage per business.
iii. Signs on public buildings located within the Civic
Overlay.
iv. Non-illuminated tenant signs shall be permitted on the
second or third story (not above third floor) when the
primary entrance of the business is located on the second
or third floor and the primary business entrance door is
external to the building accessed only by an external
balcony or walkway via an external elevator/stairway or
courtyard. Signs shall be placed at business frontage only.
v. When a business or tenant occupies more than 50
percent of the total gross building area the tenant or
business may have a sign on the third or fourth story of the
building.
Figure IV-113 a,b: Example of a portable sign.
IV-154
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
14. Sign Lighting
Signs shall to utilize the following illumination methods
only:
a. External Illumination: Externally illuminated signs
shall be down-lit gooseneck light fixtures (or other
decorative spotlight fixtures) with single or multiple
spotlights.
b. Internal Illumination: Internally illuminated signs
shall be three dimensional back-lit halo letters and/or a
logo. Signage may also include an opaque signboard
with cut-through letters and/or a logo, providing a
backlit halo effect. Internal illumination is only
permitted for wall mounted signs, blade signs, or
hanging signs. Internally illuminated signs shall
comply with the following:
i. Lighting shall emit only a white backlit halo light (no
other color shall emit from the lighted sign). At no time
shall lighting emit through a front-facing translucent
material other than white. Internal illumination shall be
backlit, reflecting a white halo light against a wall or
back panel.
ii. Backlit letters or logos may be affixed directly onto
the building façade or sign board/panel. A sign board
panel may also be internally illuminated with cut-
through letters.
iii. Permitted font styles for internally illuminated signs
utilizing a sign board/panel with cut-through letters are
limited to italics, cursive, or narrow print styles such as
Lucida Sans, Arial Narrow, Univers, or similar fonts
subject to approval by the Director of Planning.
iv. If a sign board/panel is used for internally
illuminated signs, it shall be black or bronze in color.
Sign boards/panels with routed letters or logos shall
emit a backlit halo light from behind the edges of the
signboard.
v. Exposed bulbs, colored translucent lit material, can
signs, or cabinet signs are strictly prohibited.
Figures IV-115a-f: Examples of various lighting methods
IV-155
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
15. Allowable Sign Area
Each business (with the exception of Bed and Breakfast
establishments) may choose a combination of different
sign types not to exceed the maximum square footage
requirements for each sign type in Table IV-35 and the
combined allowable square footage as outlined in Table
IV-34.
Maximum sign area for Bed and Breakfast
Establishments is limited to six square feet. Signs for
Bed and Breakfast Establishments may not be
freestanding.
a. Single Frontage
i. Business establishments having a single frontage onto
a public street are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square
feet of total sign area per linear foot of business
establishment frontage.
ii. Each business shall be permitted no more than one
internally illuminated sign. Of the allowable sign types
only wall signs, hanging signs and blade signs may be
illuminated.
iii. Logos count toward total allowable square footage.
iv. Each business may use any combination of Wall
Mounted/Painted Signs or Hanging Signs, Blade Signs,
Awning Signs, Plaque Signs and Under Canopy Signs
to arrive at the total allowable square footage.
v. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs, Accessory Signs
and Temporary Signs shall not be counted toward the
overall total sign area permitted for the business except
as noted for Building Name Signs. Each sign type shall
not exceed the maximum square footage described in
this chapter.
b. Double Frontage
i. Business establishments having frontage on two public
streets are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of
total sign area per linear foot of business establishment
frontage along the primary street and 0.5 square feet of
total sign area per linear foot of business establishment
frontage along the secondary street.
ii. Business establishments that have frontage along
Murrieta Creek shall also be permitted a maximum of 1.5
square feet of total sign area per linear foot of business
establishment frontage along the creek frontage.
iii. Each business shall not be permitted more than one
internally illuminated sign. Of the one illuminated sign
only wall signs, hanging signs and blade signs may be
illuminated.
iv. Logos count toward total allowable square footage.
v. Each business may use any combination of Wall
Mounted/Painted Signs or Hanging Signs, Blade Signs,
Awning Signs, Plaque Signs and Under Canopy Signs to
arrive at the total allowable square footage.
vi. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs, Accessory Signs and
Temporary Signs shall not be counted toward the overall
total sign area permitted for the business except as noted
for Building Name Signs. Each sign type shall not exceed
the maximum square footage described in this chapter.
c. Interior Frontage/Courtyard
i. When a building has a courtyard or interior plaza
directly accessed from the public right-of-way, each
business located within the interior plaza or courtyard
shall be permitted a maximum sign area not to exceed one
square foot per linear foot of business
establishment/tenant leasehold frontage.
ii. Buildings with interior frontage/courtyard are
permitted to have the same combined sign types described
in the section above.
iii. If the primary business entrance door is external to the
building and accessed through the courtyard, internal
illumination at its business frontage is permitted
consistent with the lighting standards set forth in this
section. Secondary signs, placed to face streetside (not
the main entrance located within the courtyard) shall be
permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 0.5
square foot per linear foot of business establishment
frontage.
d. Rear/Secondary Entry
i. Businesses that have parking or pedestrian access at the
rear or alley of business, with public access through a rear
entry, are permitted a maximum of one Plaque Sign not to
exceed 2 feet or one Blade Sign not to exceed 3 square feet
and not internally illuminated.
ii. The rear facing sign shall be located adjacent to a rear
entry point or on the exterior wall of the business.
IV-156
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table IV-34: Sign Area Calculations
Sign Type Counted towards total combined allowable square footage area? Wall Mounted/Painted, or Hanging Signs
Yes
Blade Signs Yes
Awning Signs Yes Plaque Signs
Yes
Under Canopy Signs Yes
Interior Frontage/Courtyard Signs Yes
Rear/Secondary Signs Yes
Accessory Signs
• Directory Signs/Directory Signs No
• Menu Boards No
• Hours of Operation No
• Building Name Sign Yes, if the sign contains the tenant name
• Window Sign No
Sidewalk Terrazzo/ Mosaic Signs
No
Temporary Banners No A-Frame Signs No
Figure IV-116: Examples of various signage types allowed in Old Town. Businesses
are allowed to choose from a combination of allowable signage types. Red line
depicts measurement of tenant leasehold or business establishment’s linear frontage.
IV-157
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table IV-35: Allowable Sign Area Matrix
Sign Type Maximum Square Footage/ Sign Height/Sign Width/Sign Dimensions
Wall Mounted/Painted Signs
1 square foot per linear foot of architectural element on which the sign is placed. Height and width not to exceed 90% of the sign placement area.
Hanging Signs (must be parallel to the street)
Limited to 75% of the width of the business frontage or 75% of the width of the columns if located under a porch or arcade. Sign height shall not exceed 12 inches.
Blade Signs (must be perpendicular to the street) 6 square feet maximum
Awning Signs Sign area is limited to the valence of the awning. Maximum letter height is 7-inches. Plaque Signs
2 square feet maximum
Under Canopy Signs 3 square feet maximum
Sidewalk Terrazzo/ Mosaic Signs
Required to abut the entry door and shall not exceed 4 feet in height.
Temporary Banners 32 square feet maximum A-Frame Signs Shall not exceed 3 feet wide and four feet in height Accessory Signs
• Directory Signs 4 square feet
• Directional Signs 3 square feet
• Menu Boards 4 square feet
• Hours of Operation 2 square feet
• Building Name Sign Limited to 0.5 square foot per linear foot of the building frontage length upon which the sign is placed. Maximum letter height shall not exceed 15 inches.
• Window Sign Limited to 50% of the door or window area on which the sign is placed
IV-158
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
16. Allowable Sign Types
a. Wall Mounted/Painted Signs
All Wall Mounted/Painted signs shall be counted
toward the combined maximum allowable sign area
consistent with Table IV-34 and Table IV-35. Wall
signs may be painted directly on the parapet or sign
placement area.
i. Maximum Sign Area
• Sign area may not exceed one square foot per
linear foot of the architectural element on
which the sign is placed.
• Height and width of Wall Mounted/Painted
sign (measured from the edges of the letters,
logos or figurative shapes) shall not exceed 90
percent of the sign placement area on which
the sign is placed.
ii. Illumination
• Wall mounted and painted signs may be
internally or externally illuminated consistent
with Section IV.J.14 contained herein. Non-
Illuminated wall signs are also permitted.
iii. Sign Placement
• Wall Mounted/Painted signs shall align
vertically with major architectural elements,
such as doors and windows.
• Moldings, pilasters, arches, windows, roof
eaves, or cornice lines shall be used to frame
or dictate the sign placement area as the
architecture permits.
• If it is architecturally incompatible to locate a
Wall Mounted/Painted sign above the business
entry, a Wall Mounted/Painted sign located to
the right or left of the entry door may be
permitted.
• Wall signs and sign boards for shop fronts with
galleries or arcades may be brought forward to
the front façade provided there is 8 feet
clearance from the ground.
iv. Ornamental Elements/Design
• Figurative signs shaped to reflect the silhouette
of a particular object are permitted. All
elements of these signs shall be counted
toward the combined maximum allowable sign
area.
• Three diminsional letters shall be made of
metal, wood or synthetic wood. Shiny or
recognizably plastic or vinyl materials are
prohibited.
• Sign colors shall be compatible with the
building’s color palette.
Figure IV-117: Example of appropriate sign placement.
Sign is aligned vertically and to scale with the major
architectural elements of the building.
Figure IV-118 a-d: Examples of wall mounted
and painted signs.
IV-159
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
b. Plaque Signs
Plaque signs are attached to surfaces adjacent to
business entries and are smaller versions of wall signs.
These signs are intended to provide tenant identification
to pedestrians. All Plaque Signs shall be counted
toward the combined maximum allowable sign area.
i. Maximum Sign Area. Maximum projection: two
inches from the wall. Sign area may not exceed two
square feet.
ii. Illumination. Signs may be externally illuminated
consistent with Section IV.J.14 contained of this
chapter. Non-Illuminated wall signs are also permitted.
iii. Sign Placement. Plaque signs are limited to wall
surfaces adjacent to tenant entries.
Figures IV-119a,b,&c: Examples of Plaque Signs and their typical placement on a building façade.
IV-160
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
c. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs
Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs shall not be counted towards
the combined maximum allowable sign area.
Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs shall be inlaid on the
ground at the entrance of a business.
i. A Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Sign shall abut the entry
door(s) and shall not exceed 4 feet in height. A
different location or a larger dimension may be
permitted by the Planning Director through the
application of a Minor Modification.
ii. A Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic sign shall not be placed
within the public right of way.
iii. Sidewalk Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs shall relate to
commercial activities of the business, wine country or
the area’s historic identity, and may include the onsite
business name which shall not exceed 40 percent of the
overall area.
iv. These signs shall be professional artwork including,
but not limited to, mosaics and inlaid terrazzo artwork.
Terrazzo signs that appear as printed poster
advertisements or incorporate neon colors are
prohibited.
v. Adhesive Polycarbonate, plastic or laminated
materials are strictly prohibited.
Figures IV-120a,b,&c: Examples of sidewalk
Terrazzo/Mosaic Signs
IV-161
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
d. Blade Signs
All blade signs shall be counted toward the combined
maximum allowable sign area.
i. Maximum Sign Area
• Sign area may not exceed six square feet. The
bracket does not count toward the sign area
calculations. Blade signs shall not extend more
than four feet from the wall surface. No more
than one blade sign per tenant frontage is
permitted.
ii. Illumination
• Signs may be internally or externally
illuminated consistent with Section IV.J.14
contained herein. Non-illuminated blade signs
are also permitted.
iii. Sign Placement/Design
• Blade Signs shall be attached to buildings; not
to poles or other signs. Minimum vertical
clearance shall be 8 feet. Blade signs may
encroach into the public right-of-way a
maximum of three feet subject to the approval
of the Director of Planning and the Director of
Public Works.
• Projecting signs shall be sized and oriented to
the pedestrian scale.
• Figurative signs shaped to reflect the silhouette
of a particular object related to the business are
permitted.
• Blade signs shall be made of metal, wood or
synthetic wood. Shiny or recognizably plastic
materials are prohibited. Sign colors shall be
compatible with the building’s color palette.
Figure IV-121 a-e: Examples of Blade Signs
IV-162
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
e. Awning Signs
All Awning signs shall be counted toward the combined
maximum allowable sign area.
i. Illumination
• Awning Signs shall not be internally
illuminated or back lit. Gooseneck down
lighting or no illumination is permitted.
ii. Maximum Sign Area
• Sign area is limited to the valence of the
awning. Letters shall be a maximum of 7
inches in height. Valences shall be a minimum
of 8 inches in height. Awning sign size shall
be measured by sign area, not awning size.
The determination of awning size (as well as
color and location of awning) shall consider
surroundings.
iii. Sign Placement/Design
• Awning signs shall be permitted on the ground
floor only.
• Awnings shall be canvas, with letters dyed or
painted on fabric. Plastic or vinyl awnings are
prohibited.
• Awning colors shall be compatible with the
building’s color palette. Awning may be solid
or two toned only.
• The color of the letters shall be compatible
with the awning and the building’s color
palette and shall be easily legible.
• Awnings shall be maintained free of dust and
debris, and faded or torn awnings shall be
repaired or replaced.
• Minimum vertical clearance shall be 8 feet.
• Repeating the business name across the
valence of an awning is not permitted.
Business name or message shall be permitted
only on the front and each side of the awning.
Figure IV-122 a,b: Examples of Awning Signs
IV-163
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
f. Hanging Signs
As an alternative only to Wall Mounted/Painted Sign, a
Hanging Sign may be used only in cases where a Wall
Mounted/Painted sign is not architecturally feasible.
All Hanging Signs shall be counted toward the
combined maximum allowable sign area.
i. Maximum Sign Area
• Hanging signs must be parallel to the street or
business frontage and, in addition, hanging
signs may not exceed 75 percent of the width
of the business frontage or be more than 12
inches in height.
• Hanging signs may not exceed 75 percent of
the width between posts or columns if located
under a porch or arcade setting.
• If located over a walkway, the vertical
clearance between the bottom of the sign and
walking grade shall be a minimum of 8 feet.
ii. Illumination
• Signs may be externally illuminated consistent
with Section IV.J.14 contained herein.
• Signs shall not be internally illuminated or
back lit.
• Non-illuminated hanging signs are also
permitted.
iii. Sign Placement
• Hanging signs shall be permitted only as an
alternative to a standard Wall Mounted/Painted
Sign in cases where it would be more
architecturally compatible than a wall sign.
• Hanging signs shall be placed at the business
frontage only.
g. Under Canopy Signs
One Under Canopy sign per business is allowed under a
canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch at business
entrance. All Under Canopy Signs shall be counted
toward the combined maximum allowable sign area
i. Maximum Sign Area
• Maximum sign area is 3 square feet.
• The vertical clearance between the bottom of
the sign and walking grade shall be a minimum
of 8 feet.
ii. Illumination
• Signs may be externally illuminated consistent
with Section IV.J.14 contained herein.
• Under Canopy Signs shall not be internally
illuminated or back lit.
• Non-illuminated Under Canopy signs are also
permitted.
iii. Sign Placement
• Under a covered canopy, roof walkway or
porch, hanging signs are pedestrian oriented
signs and shall be located at the business
entrance.
IV-164
Figure IV-123: Example of a Hanging Sign
Figure IV-124: Example of an Under Canopy Sign
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
h. Window Signs
Window signs shall be permanent signs which are
directly affixed to the window. Window signs shall not
be counted towards the allowable sign area for frontage
signs described in Section IV.J.15 herein.
i. Illumination
• Window signs shall not be illuminated.
ii. Sign Placement
• One window sign is permitted per business.
• Window signs shall be gold-leaf and/or black
in color.
Professionally painted window signs are preferred,
however a vinyl application is permitted.
iii. Maximum Sign Area
• On ground level and second level: Window
signs are permitted on one window per
business frontage plus the entrance doorways.
Window signs are not permitted above the
second floor.
• Window signs shall be limited to 50 percent of
the door or window area upon which they are
affixed.
i. Accessory signs
Accessory signs shall not be counted towards the
combined maximum allowable sign area. Accessory
signs shall not be internally illuminated or back lit.
External illumination consistent with Section IV-J.14
contained herein or no illumination is acceptable.
Accessory signs include directory signs, menu boards,
directional signs, building name signs and hours of
operations. The specific criteria related to each one of
these accessory signs is outlined below:
i. Directory Signs
• Directory signs shall not be counted towards
the combined maximum allowable sign area.
• Directory signs shall be located on the
building’s exterior wall adjacent to public
access entrance(s) to the building.
• Directory signs are intended for pedestrian
visibility only and shall be maintained with
current tenants. The design of the sign shall
match the building’s architectural style.
• The color of the sign shall be compatible with
the color palette of the building and wall upon
which it is placed. Materials shall be
consistent with the allowable materials for
signs within this Specific Plan.
• The maximum size may not exceed 4 square
feet.
• Directory signs shall contain only the name of
the tenants and may contain address, suite
numbers or floor numbers. Projecting
Directory signs shall have an 8 foot clearance
to the walking grade.
Figure IV-126: Examples of Directory Signs.
Figure IV-125: Examples of Window Signs.
IV-165
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ii. Menu Boards
• Menu Boards shall not be counted towards the
combined maximum allowable sign area.
• One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or
other eating establishment.
• The maximum size may not exceed 4 square feet.
Menu Boards may contain only the name of the
establishment and the food available inside.
• The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent
to the main customer entrance and shall be
maintained with up-to-date menu items.
• No permit is required for a Menu Board that
complies with these provisions.
iii. Directional Signs
• Interior project directional signage is allowed in
interior courtyards.
• Directional signs are permitted on the exterior of a
building only adjacent to stairways and elevators to
guide patrons to rear area and upstairs tenants.
• The maximum size may not exceed three square
feet.
• No permit is required for a Directional Signs that
complies with these provisions.
• Directional Signs do not identify individual tenant
names.
Figure IV-127: Example of a Directory Sign.
iv. Building Name Signs
The purpose of allowing building name signs is to allow
for the identification of buildings. Building Name signs
shall not be counted towards the combined maximum
allowable sign area, except when the building name
signage advertises a tenant located within the building.
In this case the signage will not be considered a
building name sign but will be included in the total
square footage permitted for the business.
• Building Name Signs may be either externally
illuminated or not illuminated.
• The sign shall not exceed 0.5 square feet per
linear foot of building frontage length upon
which the sign is placed.
• Maximum letter height shall not exceed 15
inches.
• No logos are allowed as part of the Building
Name sign.
• The color and design shall be compatible with
the building.
IV-166
Figure IV-128: Example of a Building Name sign.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
v. Hours of Operation.
• Signs advertising the Hours of Operation for a
business shall be limited to 2 square feet and
shall not be illuminated.
• Detachable or hanging signs are permitted. If
applied to the window, lettering shall be gold
leaf and/or black in color.
• No permit is required for an “Hours of
Operation” sign that complies with these
provisions.
17. Sign Maintenance
Sign maintenance is the sole responsibility of the
tenants. Signs shall be kept in good repair. Neglect such
as, but not limited to peeling paint, rust stains, or
burned out light bulbs shall not be permitted and the
repairs shall be pursued in a timely manner. Signs must
also be maintained in a safe condition and poise not
safety hazard. Signs must meet all requirements of the
Uniform Building Code.
IV-167
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(This page is left blank intentionally).
IV-168
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
K. PUBLIC SIGNAGE DESIGN CONCEPT
Public signage is intended to provide a cohesive and
recognizable marketing identity for the Old Town area
for City signs. The strategic development of a public
signage concept in Old Town is intended to be a part of
the “Old Town Branding and Marketing Plan” that will
be developed and implemented as funding becomes
available. The public signage concept is intended to
“brand” Old Town as Temecula’s downtown
destination and maintain a lively pedestrian
environment by creating a comfortable and easily
navigable urban core. Public Signage in Old Town will
ensure that those visiting the area can quickly identify
the location of various destinations such as public
parking, the general location of retail shops, restaurants,
and entertainment venues, and other points of interest
within the area.
The public signage concept in Old Town consists of
Old Town Gateway Signs, Directory Signs, Directional
Way Finding Signs, Special Event/Light Pole Banner
Signs, and the Old Town/Downtown logo. The purpose
of the public signage design guidelines are to provide a
conceptual reference for implementing a cohesive and
uniform public signage plan in Old Town.
1. Old Town Gateway Signs-
The Old Town Gateway Signs were completed in
February 1999 and currently exist at the north end of
Old Town Front Street south of Moreno Road, and at
the south end of Old Town Front Street south of First
Street. The Old Town Gateway Signs are over the
traffic lanes and mark the entrance into the Downtown
Core. They also announce the arrival of visitors into the
Old Town area.
2. Directory Signs-
Directory Signs are intended to provide information
related to the location of various public or City owned
points of interest in Old Town. Directory Signs should
include a map of the area to orient pedestrians and
visitors within the area. The map should also include
the various locations of public places that may be of
interest to those visiting the area. The Directory Signs
should also be designed to incorporate a window or
changeable space to advertise the City’s signature
events, such as the Rod Run and Bluegrass Festival.
The ability to change the Directory Signs will allow for
themed signage that can be changed by the City as
seasonal promotions or events occur within the area
during different times of the year. Directory signs are
intended to be located in the right-of-way and will not
advertise specific businesses.
The placement of the Directory Signs in Old Town will
be phased in as the need arises. Directory signs should
be placed in a manner that will best serve pedestrians
and those visiting the area. The Directory Signage is
encouraged to be located on Old Town Front Street,
Main Street, Mercedes Street at the Civic Center
Parking Structure, and other locations as appropriate.
The location of Directory Signs may be permitted as
deemed appropriate by the Old Town Local Review
Board and the Director of Planning.
Figure IV-129:
Example images
of Directory
Signs.
IV-169
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Directory Sign Contents:
This section is intended to address the conceptual
contents to be included on the Directory Signs in Old
Town. The potential contents of Directory Signs in Old
Town may include:
• Public parks
• Public parking facilities
• Various points of interest such as the
Temecula Theatre, History Museum, and
Pennypickle’s Imagination Workshop
• Murrieta Creek Trail
• Designated Historic Buildings with a small
description of historic use
• Southern Emigrant Trail
• Civic Center/Civic Center Plaza
• Public Art Displays
The potential contents for the Directory Signs listed
above are conceptual ideas. The actual contents of the
signage will be developed in detail as a part of the “Old
Town Branding and Marketing Plan.” The “Old Town
Branding and Marketing Plan” is intended to address
the design, aesthetics, theme, and overall look of City
signs, banners, and other governmental signs in Old
Town.
3. Directional Way Finding Signage-
Directional Way Finding Signage is intended to provide
pedestrian oriented directional signage that will assist
those exploring Old Town by foot. These signs are
intended to continually direct pedestrians to various
public points of interest within the Old Town area.
Directional Way Finding Signage is intended to provide
frequent directional information that will assist
individuals in finding their way around Old Town.
Directional Way Finding Signs may be located (but are
not limited to) major intersections, major pedestrian
travel-ways such as along Murrieta Creek, along Old
Town Front Street, Main Street and Mercedes, and
along other streets as deemed appropriate and as needed
based upon the various land use patterns, future
development projects and public points of interest.
Directional Way Finding signage is intended to be
located in the right-of-way and will not advertise
specific businesses.
Figure IV-130: Example
images of directional way
finding signs
IV-170
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
a. Directional Way Finding Sign Content:
This section is intended to address the potential contents
to be included on the Directional Way Finding Signage
in Old Town. The potential contents of Directional Way
Finding Signs in Old Town may include the following:
• Way finding signage to various public parking
facilities in Old Town
• Way finding signage to the Civic Center and
Civic Center Plaza
• Changeable signage concept for City signature
special events
• Way finding signage to various public points
of interest such as Murrieta Creek, Temecula
Theatre, Pennypickles-Temecula Children’s
Museum, designated historic structures, and
public art displays
• Signs that point to the location of City
signature special events and provide pedestrian
direction to special event locations
The potential contents for the Directional Way Finding
Signs in Old Town are conceptual ideas. The actual
design of the signage will be developed in detail as a
part of the “Old Town Branding and Marketing Plan.”
IV-171
Figure IV-131: Example of a directional way
finding sign.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
4. Special Event/Light Pole Banners-
The Special Event/Light Pole banners that are placed on
the light poles in Old Town are intended to provide a
decorative element that adds to the vibrant streetscape
and lively ambiance in the area. The Special
Event/Light Pole Banner Signs are intended to be
included as a part of the public signage concept for Old
Town. The Special Event/Light Pole Banners Signs are
intended to provide visible and uniform promotion of
City signature special events and provide a decorative
marketing theme for seasonal promotions in Old Town.
The design and graphics of the Special Event/Light Pole
Banners should be maintained to provide an up-to-date
and current design and stylized image for the Old Town
area. The Special Event/Light Pole signs should be
maintained in good condition, quality and repair at all
times. Special Event/Light Pole Banner Signs should be
placed at least 7 feet above the finished grade and
should be designed to be in scale with the adjacent
buildings and structures. Special Event/Light Pole
Banner Signs should be consistent throughout Old
Town.
The thematic contents of the Special Event/Light Pole
Banner signs are intended to be fairly broad in scope to
allow for creativity in the design and marketing concept
for Old Town. The sign contents should be related to a
specific City sponsored signature special event in Old
Town. These signs should not depict or advertise any
specific tenants or privately sponsored events that have
no affiliation with the City.
The concept for the Special Event/Light Pole Banner
Signs discussed above is not intended to solidify the
actual design or contents of the signage. The actual
contents of the signage will be developed in detail as a
part of the “Old Town Branding and Marketing Plan.”
IV-172
Figure IV-132: Example of a Special Event/Light Pole
Banner.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
5. Street Name Signs
The Street Name Sign concept for Old Town is
intended to provide a design aesthetic that respects the
historical character of the area. The Street Name Signs
should be made of simple wood construction. Old
Town’s logo may be incorporated into the street name
placard or pole as appropriate. Directional Way Finding
Signage may be added to the Street Name Poles, as
approved by the Director of Planning and the Director
of Public Works, when it has been determined that such
signage is necessary to provide direction to assist
pedestrians and vehicles in navigating to public points
of interest in the area.
6. Old Town/Downtown Logo Signage-
The Old Town/Downtown logo should be developed as
a part of the “Old Town Branding and Marketing Plan.”
The Old Town Logo should relate to the historical
character of the area, but tie in modern day marketing
strategies. The development of the Old Town Logo
should consider the following:
• Vision Statement for Old Town
• Old Town’s Historical Legacy
• Cultural and artistic offerings that are available
in Old Town
• Promoting economic development and local
commerce
• The “branding” concepts that evolve as a part
of the “Old Town Branding and Marketing
Plan”
• Images that capture the essence of Old Town
as Temecula’s urban downtown destination
Figure IV-133: Example image of a street name
sign.
IV-173
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
IV. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
(This page is left blank intentionally).
IV-174
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
CONTENTS:
A.Introduction……………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………………..……………………… V-4
1. Relationship to the Urban Standards……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-4
2. Purpose of the Design Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………............................ V-5
B. Old Town Architectural Heritage……………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………. V-6
1. Historical Building Forms………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-6
2. Historical Frontage Types………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-7
3. Historical Architectural Styles………………………………………………………………………………...……….…..................................... V-8
a. Temecula Mercantile Building……………………………………………………………………………………….............................. V-8
b. Welty Building………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-9
c. Peter Mouren General Merchandise…………………………………………………………………………………………………...... V-10
d. Welty Hotel……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-11
e. First National Bank…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... V-12
f. Santa Fe Railroad…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………V-13
g. Palomar Hotel…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-14
h. Champion Building……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-15
i. Craftsman Style………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-15
j. Victorian Style…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-15
k. Summary of Buildings, Circa 1930……………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-16
4. Historical Materials……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-17
5. Western Materials………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................................... V-18
C. Architectural Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-19
1. Building Form…………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………………………. V-19
2. Building Frontages………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-20
a. Shopfront………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-21
b. Gallery……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………V-22
c. Arcade………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………………. V-23
d. Two-Story Gallery…………………………………………….……………………………………..………………………………..… V-24
e. Forecourt……….………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….. V-25
f. Stoop………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………................................. V-26
g. Porch ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………................................. V-27
h. Exterior Stairs……………………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………... V-28
i. Combining Frontage Types………………………………………….…………………………………………………………………... V-29
3. Architectural Style Guidelines………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………….... V-30
a. American Mercantile……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-31
b. Spanish Influence: Mission Revival, Spanish Renaissance, Andalusian……………………………………………………………….. V-32
i. Mission Revival……………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………. V-32
ii. Spanish Renaissance……………………………………………………………………….………………………………….. V-33
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-1
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
iii. Andalusian…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-33
iv. Spanish Influenced Façade Characteristics…………………………………………………………………………………… V-35
c. Monterey……………………………………………………………………………………………….………………………………... V-40
d. Early Modernism………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-43
e. Neo-Classical Revival……………………………………………………………………………………………................................... V-45
f. Craftsman Bungalow……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-47
g. Queen Anne…………………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………. V-48
h. Western Frontier………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-49
D. Parking Lot Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-55
1. Parking Lot Orientation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-55
2. Joint Parking Facilities Encouraged ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-56
3. Parking Lot Design ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-56
4. Site Access/Driveways …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-57
5. Parking Facility Design for Residential Projects ………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-58
6. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Considerations/Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………. V-59
E. Urban Landscape Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………........................................................ V-61
1. General Landscape Guidelines …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-61
2. General Landscape Materials Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
3. Old Town Plant Palette …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
4. Tree Preservation in Old Town …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-64
5. Water Quality Management Plan Considerations/Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………........................ V-65
6. Green Roof Technology Design Considerations …………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-66
F. Public Art Guidelines…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..................... V-67
1. Location of Public Art ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-68
2. Symbolic and Thematic Content …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-71
3. Mosaics and Murals ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-72
4. Sculptures and Monuments……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-73
5. Lighting Displays ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….... V-73
6. Streetscape and Paving Treatments ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-73
7. Benches and Street Furniture ………………………………………………………………………………………………….............................. V-74
8. Gateways …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-74
9. Way-Finder ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............................. V-74
10. Landscape Treatments and Raised Seating Walls ………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-75
11. Other Types of Public Art ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-75
G. Outdoor Dining/Sidewalk Furniture Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-77
1. Furniture Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………............... V-77
2. Umbrella Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-78
3. Fencing Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-79
4. Landscape Treatment Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-80
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-2
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
H. Paving Material Guidelines……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...… V-81
1. Recommended Paving Treatment Types ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-81
2. Recommended Placement of Paving Materials ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-82
3. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Considerations/Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………… V-83
I. Streetscape Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………... V-85
1. Sidewalk Concept ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-85
2. Street Trees ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-86
3. Street Furnishings ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-86
a. Benches …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-86
b. Street Lighting ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-87
c. Trash Receptacles ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-88
d. Newspaper Racks ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-88
e. Mailboxes ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-89
f. Bus Shelters ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-89
g. Parking Meters …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. V-90
4. Other Street Furnishings ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......... V-90
J. Alley Guidelines………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… V-91
1. Public Alleyways …………………………………………………………………………………..…………………………………………….. V-91
2. Private Alleyways ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-92
K. Utility and Infrastructure Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… V-93
1. Water Service Design Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... V-93
2. Electrical Service Design Guidelines ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….......... V-95
3. Natural Gas Service Design Guidelines ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. V-96
V-3
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
A. INTRODUCTION
The Design Guidelines contained in this chapter are
intended to provide clear recommendations for the
design and aesthetic quality of all development in Old
Town. The Design Guidelines highlight Old Town’s
historical heritage and aspire to respect Old Town’s
historic past. The implementation of the Design
Guidelines will preserve Old Town’s unique character.
During the visioning process the preservation of Old
Town’s historic core emerged as an overarching theme
for the Old Town Specific Plan’s comprehensive
amendment. As such, the Design Guidelines provide an
implementation tool for this goal in order to protect and
preserve Old Town’s historic core.
This chapter includes a discussion of Old Town’s
unique architectural history, the historical building
forms and historical building frontage types that were
prevalent during the late 1880s to 1940s. It also
includes a discussion of the historically appropriate
architectural styles and building materials for Old
Town.
This chapter is intended to implement the goals and
policies related to historic preservation and architectural
authenticity within the Old Town area.
This chapter also includes a number of site planning
Design Guidelines which include recommendations for
the following: parking lots, landscaping, public art,
outdoor dining areas, paving materials, streetscape
design, alleys, utility and infrastructure design and
placement.
1. Relationship to the Urban Standards
The Design Guidelines are intended to be used in
concert with the Urban Standards and zoning
requirements contained in Chapter IV. The Design
Guidelines provide detailed architectural standards and
design considerations that are not specifically addressed
in the Urban Standards Section.
The Design Guidelines shall apply to every project
regardless of zoning district and every project will be
required to demonstrate consistency with the
recommendations outlined in this chapter.
V-4
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
2. Purpose of the Design Guidelines
The purpose of the architectural design guidelines is to:
• Acknowledge and appreciate the variety of Old
Town’s historical buildings,
• Provide a rich and varied character to the
streetscapes in Old Town,
• Enable variety and individual expression within a
design framework,
• Expedite design review through greater guideline
detail.
By the time Old Town Temecula was platted in 1884,
the Spanish had been building in southern California for
over a century. The early buildings of Old Town reflect
the architectural melting pot of American traditions and
European ideas that were adapted to the conditions in
southern California. The names of some of the
Temecula pioneers who first built in Old Town reveal
their origins: Welty is Swiss/German, Machado is
Portuguese/Spanish, and Mouren is French. The
structures built in Old Town by 1930 established an
important historical foundation of building forms,
frontage types, architectural styles, and materials.
Spanish Colonial, Mission and Monterey styles were
introduced in southern California first. Early settlers
also introduced architectural traditions from the eastern
U.S. and Europe such as American Mercantile, Neo-
Classical, and Victorian. By 1927, even modernist
influences are evident. During years 1884 through
1927, Temecula built a diverse mix of architectural
styles that were common in towns across the west. In
the design of future buildings in Old Town, these
traditions are the most authentic and appropriate to use
as references for architectural style. Sections B and C
(below) describe these historic buildings in more detail,
focusing on the topics of building form, architectural
style, frontage type, and materials.
Old Town’s early architectural heritage reveals
insights into the early settlers. These early
buildings were carefully documented as part of the
process of drafting these design guidelines. The
architecture in Old Town built from 1882 to 1930
is more diverse and eclectic than most realize. In
addition to traditional western styles, it includes
examples of such diverse styles as Neo-Classical
and Early Modernism.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-5
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
B. OLD TOWN ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE
1. Historical Building Forms
The model of Old Town in the Temecula Museum
provides excellent documentation of Old Town circa
1914. The basic building forms that existed in Old
Town circa 1914 are shown in Figure V-2. All the
buildings included in the model of Old Town (shown in
Figure V-1) are represented by these five building
forms. Figure V-1 is a photo of the model, showing the
intersection of Front and Main Streets. The essential
character of Old Town was established by 1914, and the
key historically important buildings existed. All the
buildings included in the model of Old Town shown
above are represented by these five building forms.
Figure V-2 (above): The five building forms existing in Old Town circa 1914.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-6
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
2. Historical Frontage Types
For each of the building forms noted above, three
frontage types can be seen in the model. Each row of
sketches in Figure V-3 illustrates a different frontage
type. A gallery is a roofed structure, parallel to the
façade, providing a covered extension to the public
sidewalk. The ends of the gallery are open and
continuous with adjacent buildings.
Figure V-4 shows a cross section of Main Street. The
red dashed line indicates the 80-foot wide space of the
street that is enclosed by two opposing facades. Each
facade is positioned 10 feet back from the property line;
galleries may extend up to the property line. The public
sidewalk extends an additional 10 feet into the right-of-
way. Everything built within this dashed red line
defines the character of the public realm and the
pedestrian experience in Old Town.
Figure V-4 (right): Cross section showing existing
conditions on Main Street.
Figure V-3: A summary of frontage types existing in Old Town circa 1914.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-7
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
3. Historical Architectural Styles
This section provides a brief summary of the key
historical buildings in Old Town, with notes on their
architectural style. Detailed design guidelines for these
historical architectural styles, including other examples
of each style, are in Section V.C.3 of this chapter.
a. Temecula Mercantile Building, 1885; American
Mercantile Style.
Built originally as a general merchandise store, this
building is an example of the American Mercantile
style. It is a simple brick structure with a well-
proportioned and recognizable façade. As one of the
first buildings in the newly platted town, frontier
economics dictated a simple and affordable rectangular
building with a distinctive facade. Constructed of
locally fired brick, it is a substantial structure with
wood beamed roof. Special brick detailing is reserved
for the top band of the façade.
A sketch of the symmetrical façade is shown in Figure
V-6a. It is designed in a traditional fashion as three
vertical sections. The center section, containing the
entrance, is emphasized with a higher parapet topped
with an arch. The façade design also has three
horizontal elements: a base band (the bulkhead), a
middle band containing the display windows, and a top
band containing the parapet and signage. The display
windows were a standard product in 1885, purchased
from Sears & Roebuck. The photo in Figure V-5a
shows that the building originally had a wood cornice
above the display windows, and did not have a covered
gallery. A gallery was added sometime early in the
1900s, and was subsequently replaced during the 2004
renovation of the building (Figure V-5b).
Figure V-5a: Temecula Mercantile building on the left,
1914.
Figure V-6a. Original façade of the Temecula
Mercantile Building.
Figure V-5b: Temecula Mercantile building today.
Figure V-6b: The type of building form.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-8
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
b. Welty Building, 1896; American Mercantile style.
This building is a simple two-story wood structure with
a gable roof and a extended “false front” parapet. The
galleries were added during the 1900s. The windows
and doors are asymmetrically positioned, and access to
the second floor is from an exterior door. Three of the
second floor windows on the Main Street façade had
originally been doors providing access to a flat-roofed
balcony/gallery.
Figure V-7a: Main Street elevation of the Welty
Building.
Figure V-7b:
The building
form type.
Figure V-8: Photo of the Welty Building (left center) circa 1900, looking west down
Main Street.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-9: Recent photo of the Welty Building.
V-9
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
c. Peter Mouren (Escallier & Winkels) General
Merchandise; American Mercantile Style
(demolished).
A historic photo of this building is shown in figure V-
11. This building has since been demolished, however
when it was standing in Old Town it had a simple
rectangular building form with a gable roof facing the
street and a tall rectangular parapet facing the street and
covering the gable. A gallery with a shed roof was
attached to the façade, which covered the boardwalk.
The gallery posts divided the lower façade into thirds.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-10: Elevation sketch of the Escallier and Winkels
General Merchandise Store.
Figure V-12: Escallier and Winkels General Merchandise.
Figure V-11: Early photograph of Escallier and Winkels Genral
Merchandise, circa 1914.
V-10
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
d. Welty Hotel, 1887; Monterey Style.
The Welty Hotel is an example of the Monterey style,
characterized by low-pitched roofs and wrap-around
porches. This style is a cross between the adobe
architecture of the Mission Period in California and
New England Colonial Architecture prevalent in the
mid-1800s. Design characteristics of this style include
simple rectangular, horizontal building massing with
symmetrical placement of windows and doors.
Entrances typically have side and transom lites, modest
to large roof overhangs and wood window shutters.
Figure V-13. The Welty Hotel.
Figure V-14: Building form type
of the Welty Hotel
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-11
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
e. First National Bank, 1914; Neo-Classical style.
The facade of the First National Bank is based on Neo-
Classical architecture ideas. Neo-Classical architecture
(i.e., modern buildings based on ancient Greek and
Roman architecture) have been used for centuries in the
U.S. for commercial and civic buildings in order to
create the impression of permanence, tradition and
security. This building creates a strong presence on
Front Street, and its concrete construction reinforces the
impression of permanence. The facade of the bank is
based on a traditional composition of a base, middle and
top. The bank’s base consists of two elements: a 3-foot
tall watertable (foundation), and simulated stone
masonry up to the second floor. The first floor masonry
style with large blocks and deep mortar joints is called
rustication, and was commonly used in Classical
architecture to create the impression of a heavy and
solid base. Resting upon this textured base, the upper
floor of the bank has smooth surfaces and more refined
detailing. The façade is a clear and well-proportioned
example of architectural ideas traveling from ancient
Greece, through the European Renaissance, all the way
to Old Town Temecula.
Figure V-15a: Photo of the museum model.
Figure V-15c: Façade sketch of the First National
Bank
Figure V-15b: The First National Bank building.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-12
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
f. Santa Fe Railroad Station, circa 1882; Period
Railroad Station Style
The Temecula train station was constructed shortly after
the completion of the railroad in the early 1880s. The
design is typical of train stations during this period,
with a steeper pitched roof over the main structure and a
shallow pitch overhang shading the platforms.
Figure V-16a: The Santa Fe Railroad Station circa
1882.
Figure V-16b: Photo of the model in the Museum.
Figure V-16c: Sketch of the facade of the Santa Fe
railroad station.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-13
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
g. Palomar Hotel, 1927; (Early Modernism influenced
by Spanish traditions).
The Palomar Hotel consists of two separate buildings
with a courtyard between them. The simple rectangular
volumes contain the main hotel building on Front
Street, and an ancillary building with garages and an
apartment above on Fifth Street. The flat-topped arches
support an arcade. With enclosed space above the
public sidewalk, this was the first arcade built in
Temecula. The windows are approximately
symmetrical. The Palomar Hotel is architecturally
important in Old Town, because it represents a cross
between Spanish revival (white walls, arched openings)
and the modern movement (simple, clean volumes
lacking ornamentation). The non-circular arches denote
that it is not a masonry structure, but rather an
exploration into the new formal and structural
possibilities of stucco. It is the first building with
‘modern’ influences built in Old Town before 1930. A
more detailed discussion of the early years of the
modern movement in southern California is addressed
in Section C (3) (d) of this chapter.
Figure V-17a: Palomar Hotel today.
Figure V-17b: The arcade frontage type of the Palomar
Hotel.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-14
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
h. Champion Building, 1928; Mission Revival Style.
This building is the first in Temecula to have a gallery
supported by arched openings. The original columns
were thin; the thicker masonry surrounding the columns
was added at a later date.
Figure V-18a: The Champion Building today.
Figure V-18b: Gallery frontage type of the Champion
Building.
i. Craftsman Style in Old Town.
St. Catherine’s church, located in Sam Hicks Park, has
typical Craftsman details such as angled brackets
supporting wide fly rafters, horizontal siding, and flat
wood trim around windows and doors.
Figure V-19a: St Catherine’s Church, 1917.
j. Victorian Style in Old Town.
The Victorian style was common in early California. A
few examples exist in Old Town, with Victorian style
detailing on windows, doors, cornices and soffits.
Figure V-20a: The residence next to the old firehouse
Figure V-20b: The old firehouse.
Figure V-19b: House on Pujol Street with
Craftsman detailing and a wide porch.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-15
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
k. Summary of Old Town Buildings circa 1930.
By 1930, the buildings in Old Town represented a
diversity of architectural styles. The sketch below
provides an overview of some of the facades of these
early buildings, drawn at approximately the same scale.
The purpose of this summary is to emphasize the
variety of architectural traditions, materials and
character of historic buildings in Old Town.
Figure V-21: Facade sketches of
some of the early buildings in Old
Town.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-16
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
4. Historical Materials
Materials commonly used for
shopfronts in Old Town up to 1914
include stucco, painted wood, brick
(reminiscent of the locally
manufactured brick that was
prevalent in Temecula during the late
1800s and early 1900s), glass
windows, cast-in-place concrete, and
local granite for curbs and walls.
All building materials should reflect
the historical context of Old Town
and are subject to the review and
approval of the Director of Planning.
Figure V-22 a, b, c: Examples of materials from the buildings constructed by 1914. Left: Stucco wall, double hung window with 4 over
4 divided lites, and painted wood trim on the Welty Building. Center: Brick on the Mercantile Building. Right: Glass shopfront of the
Mercantile Building.
Figure V-23 a, b, c: Examples of materials from the buildings constructed by 1914. Left: granite masonry from the jail / wine cellar.
Center: Painted wood stair on the Welty Hotel. Right: Cast-in-place concrete and painted wood windows on the Bank building.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-17
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
5. “Western” Materials. During the 1970’s, 1980’s and 1990’s many buildings were built with a western pioneer theme, and included the following materials.
Figure V-24 a, b, c: Boardwalk, Mission clay tile roof, corrugated steel
Figure V-25 a, b, c:
Board and batten over
adobe; Painted and
unpainted wood.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-18
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
C. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
The architectural design guidelines for Old Town are
organized into four topics: building form, frontage type,
architectural style, and materials. While architectural
principles are defined, variety and individual expression
within this framework are encouraged. The community
desires a character of architecture and streetscape
reflecting Temecula Valley's history, natural landscape
and climate.
1. Building Form
By 1930, the buildings on Main Street provided clear
and well-defined edges to the public realm. The
building facades were all positioned on the build-to
line, and the building forms were strong, simple
volumes. Variety on street edges was created through
the use of various frontage types (galleries, arcades,
etc.). Future buildings in Old Town are encouraged to
reinforce this historic pattern through the use of simple
and clear building massing, enlivened with various
frontage types. Building facades that exceed 50 linear
feet should incorporate varying architectural expression,
character, and rooflines so as to appear to be made up of
various smaller building facades.
Figure V-26 illustrates some common examples of two,
three and four-story building forms that are encouraged
in Old Town. The heavy dashed line is the build-to line
on which the façade must be positioned, the heavy solid
line is the property line, and the double thin lines
represent the curb. The 10-foot wide public sidewalk
lies between the property line and the curb, and the 10-
foot extension of the sidewalk onto private land lies
between the property line and the build-to line.
Galleries, arcades, awnings, canopies, signage, etc. are
located within the 10 feet between the property line and
the facade.
The realm of the streets is the primary public asset in
Old Town. The goals for this public realm include
clearly defined street edges, architecture with character,
and a lively and interesting pedestrian experience.
While the private needs of tenants are met within the
interior spaces, the public responsibility is to contribute
to a clearly defined street providing a pleasant
pedestrian experience. The following section focuses on
frontage types that may be combined with simple
building forms to achieve these goals for the public
realm.
Figure V-26: Examples of permitted building forms in Old Town.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-19
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
2. Building Frontages
The building frontage is defined as the space between
the building façade and the property line adjacent to the
street. There are seven basic frontages types that will be
permitted in Old Town. They are listed below and
described in greater detail in the following pages:
a. Shopfront
b. Gallery
c. Arcade
d. Two-story Gallery
e. Forecourt
f. Stoop
g. Porch
The zoning district dictates which building frontages
are allowed in which zones. Details about the allowable
building frontages by zone can be found in Section
IV.E, Urban Standards.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-20
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
a. Shopfront
Shopfront frontages may be used for ground-floor
commercial uses, and may include entrances to
residential units on upper floors. The building facade is
aligned with the build-to line, which is 10 feet back
from the property line. Recessed entrances are
permitted. Building entrances are at sidewalk grade.
Shopfront elements include display windows, entrances,
awnings, canopies, signage, lighting, cornices, and
other architectural elements. A solid base or bulkhead
must be provided below the display windows. A cornice
or horizontal band must be provided above the display
windows to differentiate the shopfront from upper
levels of the building and provide a sign band.
Figure V-27a,b,c: Typical Shopfront Frontage
types.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-21
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
b. Gallery
A gallery frontage is created by the addition of a
covered colonnade to a standard shopfront and is ideal
for retail use. Gallery frontages typically contain
ground-floor storefronts. The building facade is aligned
with the build-to line, which is 10 feet back from the
property line. The gallery covers the area between the
build-to line and the property line, and does not
encroach into the public right-of-way. The gallery may
be covered with a shed roof, a flat roof, or a flat roof
with a balcony railing.
Figure V-28: Gallery frontage type.
Figure V-29a: Gallery frontage type. Figure V-29b: Gallery frontage type.
Figure V-30: Gallery frontage applied to various permitted building forms.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-22
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
c. Arcade
An arcade frontage is a covered private sidewalk with
enclosed space above. Arcades are ideal for retail use
when combined with ground floor storefronts. The
colonnade structurally supports the portion of the
building above the sidewalk. The ground-floor facade is
aligned with the build-to line that is 10 feet back from
the property line. The façade of the upper story may
extend out to the property line, but not into the public
right-of-way. The façade of the upper story may extend
out to the property line, but not into the public right-of-
way.
Figure V-31: Arcade frontage type.
Figure V-32a: Arcade frontage type. Figure V-32b: Arcade frontage type.
Figure V-33 a, b, c, d: Arcade frontage type applied to various building forms.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-23
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
d. Two-Story Gallery
This frontage type is a two-story covered colonnade
added to the façade of a standard shopfront. Two-story
galleries typically contain ground-floor storefronts and
second-floor commercial or residential. The building
facade is aligned with the build-to line, which is 10 feet
back from the property line. The gallery occupies the
area between the build-to line and the property line, and
does not encroach into the public right-of-way. The
gallery may be covered with a shed roof or a flat roof
(with or without a balcony railing).
Figure V-35 a, b: Examples of two-story galleries.
Figure V-36a, b, c, d: Two-story gallery frontage applied to various building forms.
Figure V-34: Two-story gallery frontage type.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-24
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
e. Forecourt
Forecourts are created by setting back a portion of a
buildings facade, typically the central portion.
Forecourts may access ground floor or upper floor
tenants, and provide for restaurant seating, access to
paseos, etc. Forecourts may also be combined with
other frontage types, and may allow for vehicular
access to parking behind the building.
Figure V-37a: Residential forecourt. Figure V-37b: Retail forecourt with car access to rear
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-25
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
f. Stoop
Stoops are a frontage type for residential buildings
having a raised first floor. Exterior stairs and a porch
provide access to the residence. The building façade is
positioned on the build-to line, and the stoop occupies
the area between the façade and the property line. The
exterior stair may be perpendicular or parallel to the
sidewalk. The landing/porch may be covered or
uncovered.
Figure V-40 a: Residential stoop
in a two story gallery.
Figure V-40b: Entry under stoop. Figure V-40c: Paired stoops.
Figure V-39: Stoop frontage type
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-26
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
g. Porch
Porches are a frontage type for residential buildings
having a raised first floor. Exterior stairs and a porch
provide access to the residence. The building façade is
positioned on the build-to line, and the porch occupies
the area between the façade and the property line. The
exterior stair may be perpendicular or parallel to the
sidewalk. The landing/porch may be covered or
uncovered.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-27
Figure V-41: Porch
frontage type
Figure V-41a, b, c: Examples of the porch frontage type.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
h. Exterior Stairs
In order to maximize the visibility of shopfronts from
the sidewalk and street, exterior stairs may not occupy
the area between the build-to line and the frontage
property line (Figure V-42a). If the exterior stairway is
within 6 feet of the build-to line, it must be oriented
perpendicular to the build-to line (Figure V-42b).
Exterior stairs are encouraged in forecourts if they
conform to the afore-mentioned rules (Figure V-42c). In
the drawings below, the dashed line is the build-to line,
the heavy solid line is the frontage property line, and
the double line is the curb. Stairs for residential stoops
are the exception, and are permitted to be located
between the build-to line and fronting property line (see
Figure V-39).
Figure V-42b: Exterior stairs within 6 feet of
the build-to line must be oriented
perpendicular to the building façade.
Figure V-42c: Exterior stairs are encouraged in
forecourts if they conform to the guidelines in
Figures 38a and 38b.
Figure V-42a: Exterior stairs are not
permitted between the built-to-line and the
front property line.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-28
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
i. Combining Frontage Types
Creating a strong, well defined street edge can be
achieved by combining different building forms and
frontage types (see Figure V-43). The primary building
facades (tan color) are positioned on the build-to line.
Variety on street edges was created through the use of
various frontage types (salmon color: forecourts,
galleries, arcades).
This assemblage could be constructed as two or more
structures. Note mid-block Paseo between the two
buildings, linking sidewalk with parking behind. Note
also that architectural style is a separate issue.
Figure V-43: Example of 3 and 4 story building forms
combined with different frontage types. The heavy solid
line is the property line, and the heavy dashed line is the
build-to line, on which the building façade must be
located.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-29
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
3. Architectural Style Guidelines
This section outlines the architectural styles that are
encouraged to achieve a rich and varied historical
character for future buildings in Old Town. These styles
include:
a. American Mercantile
b. Spanish Influence
c. Monterey
d. Early Modernism
e. Neo-Classical Revival
f. Craftsman Bungalow
g. Queen Anne
h. Western Frontier
The vibrant streetscape in Old Town shall result from
the assemblage and combination of buildings that are
derived from these styles.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-30
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
a. American Mercantile Style
This versatile mixed-use building type is found in small
downtowns across America. It is both a building type
and an architectural style. The ground floor is used for
retail or office, and the upper floors can be either office
or residential. The design of the retail ground floor
shopfront is the model for most successful retail
buildings located on pedestrian streets. It provides clear
and unobstructed views of the display windows from
both the sidewalk and the street.
Doors with glass panels are either recessed or flush with
the façade. In order to maximize daylight within the
store, transom windows are located above the awning
and display windows. Often glazed with prismatic
glass, transom windows are intended to project light far
back into the store’s interior. The sign band is located
within the cornice above the transom windows.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-44: Typical design features of ground floor retail facades.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-45: Examples of American Mercantile style
facades.
V-31
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
b. Spanish Influence: Mission Revival, Spanish
Renaissance, and Andalusian
The influence of Spanish architecture in southern
California is represented by several related styles,
including Mission Revival, Spanish Renaissance, and
Andalusian. While they share elements such as tile
roofs, smooth stucco exterior walls and iron balconies,
they represent different Spanish architectural traditions.
Mission Revival and Mediterranean styles are often
used for public or civic buildings, Spanish Renaissance
for commercial and urban structures, and Andalusian
style for more informal and asymmetrical structures
such as residential. In practice, elements of these three
styles are often blended together. By 1920, Spanish
Renaissance, Mission Revival and Andalusian
influences were enlivening this mixture, and the mix of
styles spread throughout California. While these styles
share many features, each style has unique
characteristics. The differences between these styles are
discussed below.
i. Mission Revival Style
The missions were the earliest architecture introduced
by the Spanish, built along the California Coast during
the 1700s and early 1800s. Beginning in the late 1800s,
new buildings were being designed based on the
architecture of the Missions. The original Spanish
missions shared several basic design features:
a) Pedimented gable facade containing the main
entrance to the church.
b) One or two bell towers, typically adjacent to the
church façade, often with two or three stacked
belfries.
c) Galleries or arcades with arched openings, providing
covered walkways between buildings and rooms.
d) One or more enclosed courtyards.
Figure V-46a: Spanish mission at San Luis Rey. Figure V-46b: Santa Barbara mission.
Figure V-47a: Mission Revival: San Diego Presidio (1927) Figure V-47b: San Diego Santa Fe Depot.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-32
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
ii. Spanish Renaissance Style
While sharing some characteristics with the mission
architecture, this style draws from Spanish architecture
that comes from a more urban setting. This is a more
formal style, and creates a more urban and elegant
impression than Mission Revival. Facades are either
symmetrical or asymmetrical, and building proportions
are more vertically oriented than Mission Revival.
Building forms for this style are simple rectangular
masses. This style often includes Neo-Classical
concepts such as base-middle-top façade composition,
and Doric or Ionic columns. Shutters and iron balconies
are common.
iii. Andalusian Style
The third primary Spanish style is inspired by the
vernacular architecture of southern Spain. This style is
common in smaller towns, villages and farmhouses.
This style is more informal than either Mission Revival
or Spanish Renaissance, and is well suited for
residential buildings. Facades are asymmetrical, and
building massing may consist of a mix of heights.
Arched arcades and towers are rare. Door and window
openings are often rectangular.
Figure V-48 a,b,c: Examples of Andalusian building
styles.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-33
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Figure V-49: Residential buildings
with Andalusian character.
Figure V-50 a, b: Andalusian
characteristics: residential
courtyard; Andalusian style mixed-
use building with retail on the
ground floor and residential above.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-34
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
iv. Spanish Influenced Façade Characteristics
The differences between the three Spanish-influenced styles are illustrated below. The buildings are about the
same size, all with three floors. Facades not visible from public streets may be finished with simpler detailing.
Figure V-51a: Mission Revival often incorporates a
mission-style tower, wrought iron window grilles and
balcony railings. Arch supports are substantial,
typically 30” x 30” or larger. Gallery frontage type
with tile roof common. Facades are typically
asymmetrical.
Figure V-51b: Spanish Renaissance often incorporates
thinner columns supporting arches, with Neo-Classical
capitals and bases. Arcades common. Windows are
sometimes ganged together in horizontal rows. Towers
are optional. Facades are often symmetrical.
Figure V-51c: Andalusian style buildings are often
broken into several smaller masses with a variety of
dimensions, roof types and openings. Facades are
asymmetrical, and arched openings are optional.
A summary of the general Spanish influenced style elements common to all three sub-styles include:
• Solid, massive walls with smooth stucco finishes;
• Larger openings on the ground floor, smaller windows above;
• Door and window openings recessed from the façade;
• Arcades or galleries with round arches, flat arches or rectangular openings, set on columns of wood or stucco;
• Enclosed courtyards accessible to the street by paseos and forecourts;
• White or soft pastel earth tone colors;
• Ceramic tile accents such as planters, benches and fountains.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-35
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Spanish Influenced Roofs
• Roof pitch for Spanish Colonial/Mission style
architecture is typically low pitch. A 3:12 to
6:12 roof pitch is recommended for all main
roof surfaces, with the exception of arcades or
colonnades.
• Roof pitch for attached arcades or colonnades
is recommended to be a minimum 2:12. Roof
types are recommended to be restricted to low
pitched gable roofs, with the occasional use of
hip or shed roof as an accent at the end of the
building. The use of a mansard, A-frame, or
jerkin-head gambrel are specifically not
allowed.
• Roof material should be standard mission
barrel (U-shaped) clay tiles. Each tile should
be a uniform reddish color and non-reflective
(unglazed) for a soft finish look. Plastic roof
tiles are not permitted.
• Roofs not visible from the public street may
utilize "S" tiles of clay or concrete. A random
application of tiles is recommended over
symmetrical design. Tiles at the ends of the
eaves shall be double or triple layered with
exposed mortar to emphasize thickness.
• Flashing, vents, pipes, and sheet metal are
recommended to be located out of view of the
public street, and colored to match the
adjoining roof or wall material.
Figure V-52 a, b:
Example of well
detailed roof with
“U” shaped
mission tiles.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-36
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Exterior Building Wall Materials for Spanish
Influenced Buildings
• Building exterior walls should be smooth
finished stucco. Heavily textured stucco walls
are not recommended.
• Simulated adobe walls (painted ‘slump block’)
should not be used for structural (load bearing)
walls. Wood, metal, glass, or ‘slump block’
are not recommended as predominant exterior
wall materials.
• At wall openings on primary (street facing)
exterior walls, an appearance of thickness and
mass is strongly recommended.
Spanish Influenced Windows
Windows in Spanish influenced architecture have
diverse shapes, including rectangular, square, arched
top and circular. Casements with multiple lites are most
common, and double hung are occasionally used.
Rectangular windows shall be oriented vertically, and
may be ganged together. Deeply recessed windows
(minimum of twelve inches) in thick walls are
recommended.
Figure V-53a: Santa Barbara, CA. Figure V-53b: San Juan Capistrano Figure V-53c: San Diego, CA
Figure V-54a: Single double hung. Figure V-54b: Paired double hung. Figure V-54c: Figural circular window.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-37
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Figure V-55 (right): a: Rectangular, b: arched, c:
double windows, d: double balcony doors, e: double
balcony doors with transom lites.
Figure V-56 (right): a: Double doors; b: Double doors
with transom; c: Open terrace on upper floor.
Figure V-57 (right): Balcony materials: a) iron
balcony with knee brace supports, no roof; b) masonry
with bracket supports, no roof; c) Wood with knee
brace supports and tile roof, and d) masonry bracket
supports with iron railing.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-38
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Spanish Influenced Galleries and Arcades
Mission revival style columns should be square in cross
and appear massive in thickness; 16 inches per side is
recommended. A capital of approximately two to three
inches thick by three to six inches high should be
incorporated at the top of the column shaft. The
column's height should be four to five times the width
of the column. A column base at least 12 inches tall is
encouraged.
Galleries and arcades are recommended to have semi-
circular arches in regular series with columns as
supports. Non-circular arches such as parabolic or
pointed arches are not recommended. Flat arches will
be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, and should express
wood timber spans. In the more formal Spanish
Renaissance and Mediterranean styles, columns may be
more Neo-Classical in appearance, have slender round
shafts, and taller proportions. Arcades, patios, and
colonnades are typically paved with tile, brick, or stone.
Color Palette
Spanish Colonial/Mission architecture is typified by
simple white and off-white wall colors. While other
light pastels might be proposed, their use is discouraged
in favor of white, beige or white with an antique wash
finish. Trim colors appropriate to this style include
primary shades of blue and red, terracotta, aqua,
medium to dark shades of green, and brown. Colors
should be selected from the Sherwin Williams
Preservation Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan); however other colors may also be
appropriate and will be considered on a case-by-case
basis as approved by the Director of Planning.
Figure V-58a: 1700s mission
gallery with square columns.
Figure V-58b: 1900s Mission
revival gallery with square
columns.
Figure V-58c: 1900s Mission
revival arcade with neo-
classical columns.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-39
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
c. Monterey Style
As settlers arrived in California from the east, they
brought their architecture with them, including Colonial
and Classical Revival architecture. These imported
forms were adapted to local conditions, and combined
with adobe and Mission traditions. One result of this
architectural melting pot was what we now call
Monterey Style. The most notable local example of this
style in Old Town is the Welty Hotel. New England
settlers adapted the two-story wood-frame Colonial
house to California, and built it of adobe instead of
wood. A cantilevered gallery provided an exterior
corridor for access to second floor rooms, and also
created a generous balcony. Later, the two-story gallery
was extended, and wrapped around the building on two
or three sides.
The Monterey Style originated as a rural residential
style. When built in more densely populated towns, the
first floor was raised several feet above the sidewalk to
increase the privacy from passers-by on the sidewalk.
This is a typical (and desirable) feature of all in-town
residential buildings. However, being raised above the
sidewalk is a disadvantage for retail as it creates a
barrier between pedestrians and the shopfront windows
and doors.
Figure V-61: Evolution of the building frontage of Monterey style: a) two-story adobe house with gable roof, b)
second floor exterior corridor, c) change from gable to hip roof, d) posts extended to ground (two-story gallery), e)
wrap-around porches and galleries
Figure V-60: The Larkin House in Monterey (1834) is considered the prototype of Monterey Colonial architecture.
Figure V-59: A Monterey style house in Redlands, CA.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-40
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Common Design Elements
The qualities and design elements of Monterey Style
buildings include:
• Gabled, low pitched, shingled roof with
modest to large roof overhangs;
• Tall first floor ceiling;
• Symmetrical placement of windows and doors,
entrances with side and transom lites, wood
window shutters;
• Wood porches and second floor balconies with
wood railings; rectangular façade with
minimal wall articulation.
Roof Pitch and Materials
Roof pitch for Monterey style architecture is typically
low pitch. A 3:12 to 6:12 (vertical to horizontal slope)
roof pitch is recommended for all main roof surfaces.
Roof material should be comprised of wood shingles,
composition roofing material, flat tile, slate or painted
metal seam floors.
Exterior Building Wall Materials
Exterior building walls are encouraged to use the
following materials in an appropriate arrangement.
These include:
• Smooth stucco;
• Board and batten wood siding;
• Horizontal wood siding;
• Brick/stone; and
• Adobe block (no bearing walls).
Figure V-62: Main features of the Monterey Style.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-41
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Windows
Wooden sash widows, double hung with true divided
lites shall have attached muntins located on the exterior
surface of the glass. Flat wood trim around the windows
is recommended. Wood window shutters are
encouraged.
Porch/Canopy Columns
Porches are almost always constructed as covered
balconies that are cantilevered out from the second
floor. It is recommended to have the balcony extend
from one end of the building to the other.
Balcony columns are typically 4 x 4's or 6 x 6's and
constructed of wood.
A typical feature of Monterey architecture is the wood
railings and balustrades on the second floor balcony.
See Figure V-64 a,b.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
Buildings of this style may remain unpainted, however
painting is encouraged. While use of these colors is
recommended, other similar colors will be considered.
The Temecula Planning Department maintains a full
color brochure of the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette for public inspection. The Director of
Planning may also identify other color palettes for Old
Town that have the potential to achieve the same
results.
Figure V-63: Double
hung windows are
typical.
Figure V-64 a, b:
Typical porch and
balcony.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-42
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
d. Early Modernism
The 1927 Palomar Hotel is unique in Old Town in that
it produces two contrasting impressions: 1) A simple,
unadorned rectangular mass, and 2) Mission influenced
white plaster walls and arched openings. Flat-topped
arches were not used in missions, and the clean cubic
form of the building lacks any ornamentation or
historical detailing. The building is architecturally
important in Old Town because it represents a cross
between the white walls and arched openings of
Spanish revival, and the modern movement’s desire for
simple, clean volumes without ornamentation.
Beginning in 1915, a group of California architects
were working to modify the popular mission style into a
simplified modernist style with a local southern
California flair. The architect of the Palomar Hotel must
have been aware of this movement, for it is the first
building in Old Town that deliberately bridges the
Mission style with simplified modern geometry.
One of the leading figures in this movement was
California architect Irving Gill, who designed many
buildings in San Diego and Los Angeles. In a 1916
essay, Gill argued against historical revivalism, and in
favor of simplified forms: "the straight line, the arch,
the cube and the circle." He advocated design based on
modern reason as opposed to being based on historical
revival. He believed that architecture should have
simple forms and subtle details, and “leave the
ornamentation of it to Nature.” The examples of Irving
Gill’s work in Figures V-67 and V-68 share some
similarities with the Palomar Hotel.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-66: Residential building by Irving Gill
located in San Diego.
Figure V-65:
The Palomar
Hotel.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-43
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Figure V-67: Building by Irving
Gill located in San Diego.
Figure V-68 a, b, c: House by De Silva, circa 2005; Oceanside City Hall, 1934; Santa Barbara Post Office, 1934.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-44
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
e. Neo-Classical Revival
Modern buildings designed according to ancient Greek
and Roman architectural principles are referred to as
Neo-Classical revival. This style has been used for
centuries in the U.S. to create the impression of
permanence, tradition and security for civic and
commercial buildings. Neo-Classical design can be
used for prominent free-standing buildings, or can be
used to create buildings that fit into a streetscape
composed of other styles. Facades of Neo-Classical
buildings are based on a traditional composition of a
base, middle and top and are composed of architectural
elements with standard detailing.
The First National Bank in Old Town illustrates a Neo-
Classical technique called rustication. The ground floor
appears to be constructed of masonry with large blocks
and deep mortar joints. This was commonly used on
classical facades to create the impression of a heavy and
solid base. Resting upon this textured base, the upper
floor of the bank has smooth surfaces and more refined
detailing.
Traditional stone buildings often emphasized the
difference between the base and the middle elements
through the use of horizontal courses of large masonry
blocks to create an impression of rugged strength. This
technique was popular during the Renaissance in
Europe, and was used with both “curved arch” openings
and “flat arch” openings (like the bank). While the bank
is constructed of cast in place concrete, the designer
utilized rustication to create a traditional impression.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-69a, b: Two examples of free-standing Neo-Classical style buildings.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-45
Figure V-70: Rusticated arches from the
European Renaissance.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Figure V-71a, b, c: Examples of Neo-Classical buildings that fit well into streetscapes with other architectural styles.
Figure V-72a, b: The First National Bank building in Old Town, and the Queen’s residence at the Royal Observatory in London.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-46
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
f. Craftsman Bungalow
The Craftsman Bungalow style is an integral part of the
architectural tradition throughout California. Influenced
by the Arts and Crafts movement from England, this
style incorporated the expressive use of wood and
timber construction techniques. Old Town has several
examples of note (see Figures V-19 a, b). The
Craftsman Bungalow style is found mainly in detached
residential buildings.
Essential elements of this style include:
• Base-Middle-Top organization of facades.
• Gable roofs with slopes less than 6:12.
• Deep roof overhangs from 2 to 4 feet.
• Prominent front porches with expressive
structural elements.
• Exposed structural elements in the eaves such
as rafters and brackets.
• A mixture of materials including stucco, stone,
shingles and horizontal wood siding.
• Asymmetrical arrangements of double-hung or
casement windows.
• Use of gable or shed roofed dormers.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-74: Examples of Craftsman
Bungalow style houses in Pasadena.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-73: Typical porch and balcony.
V-47
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
g. Queen Anne Style
Queen Anne was a prominent architectural style in the
1880s and 1890s. Of all the Victorian house styles,
Queen Anne is the most elaborate and the most
eccentric. Although easy to spot, the Queen Anne style
is difficult to define. Common elements include: bay
windows, balconies, stained glass, turrets, porches,
brackets, ornate trim elements, an abundance of
decorative details, with steeply pitched and irregular
roofs, all combined in symmetrical or unsymmetrical
ways.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-75 a, b: Queen Anne
style houses.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-48
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
h. Western Frontier Style
Early towns in the western Unites States were usually
established to support farming, ranching or mining. The
architecture of the retail and commercial Main Street
that emerged consisted of simple and affordable
building volumes combined with lively storefront,
arcade or gallery frontages. The building facades
typically were positioned on a build-to line, with the
result that the space of the street had clearly defined
edges. Many of Old Town’s early buildings reflect this
tradition, with articulated façades applied to simple
boxes. Common façade materials were wood, brick and
stone, with heavy cornices and vertically oriented
windows. One story galleries constructed of white
painted wood were common.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800s are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of another era.
While use of these colors is recommended, other similar
colors will be considered. The Temecula Planning
Department maintains a full color brochure of the
Sherwin-Williams Preservation Exterior Palette for
public inspection. The Director of Planning may also
identify other color palettes for Old Town that have the
potential to achieve the same results.
Figure V-765a, b: Western Frontier shopfronts and gallery.
V-49
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
The following illustrate examples of buildings that have
incorporated the Western Frontier architectural style
with other historic building forms:
Figure V-78 a, b: Western Frontier shopfronts and gallery.
Figure V-77 a, b: Western Frontier shopfronts and galleries.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-50
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Storefront Design combined with the Western
Frontier Style
The storefront on the ground floor is a key element in
creating a successful pedestrian environment. The
design elements of the storefront are similar to the
American Mercantile style, as shown in Figure V-79
below.
The glazed area of the storefront should be between 75
percent and 85 percent of the ground floor façade.
Figure V-79: The main elements of traditional shopfronts.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-51
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Roof Pitch and Materials
• Roofs may be flat or sloped. Western false
front parapet walls are encouraged but blank
parapet walls around flat roofs are not allowed
without a strong architectural cornice. The
visible portion of sloped roofs should be
sheathed with a roofing material having texture
meaningful at the pedestrian scale, such as
standing seam metal roofing, wood shingle, or
tile.
• Roof form should be consistent and integrated
into the building composition.
• The roof should be designed to screen rooftop
equipment from public view.
• Roofs or parapet walls should wrap around the
entire building. Wood shingles, composition
roofing material, tile, slate, or painted metal
seam roofs meeting City Codes are acceptable.
Parapet Walls
Parapet walls are an integral component of western
architecture. In addition to providing visual screening
of roof top equipment, they provide opportunity to
establish an architectural character and display of signs.
The integration of parapet walls into building design is
encouraged. Parapets shall conform to the following
guidelines.
• Parapet walls shall completely screen the roof
behind and all roof mounted equipment.
• They shall be finished on any side visible from
the street with materials compatible with those
predominantly used on the building.
• Parapet walls visible from rear or side yards
shall be finished as above. However, they may
utilize exterior plaster in lieu of wood siding.
• Parapet walls shall utilize significant
ornamental wood trim at the top, or utilize a
heavily ornamented cornice.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-52
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Exterior Building Wall Materials
Exterior building walls are encouraged to use the
following materials in a historically appropriate
arrangement.
• Board and batten wood siding, minimum of 12
inches with one inch by two inch bats
• Horizontal wood siding with a horizontal 'V'
joint, horizontal channel joint ship lap with a
minimum 3/8 inch channel, or beveled
• Brick
• Stone (granite preferred)
• Adobe block (except for bearing walls)
• Vertical wood siding with wood battens
Windows
• Wooden sash windows with decorative
pediment are recommended.
• Storefront windows typically project out from
wall surface and are multi-lite.
• Second floor windows were typically wooden
sash, double hung, traditional windows.
Window shutters are optional.
Figure V-80 a, b, c, d: Examples of upper story windows.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-52
V-53
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan
Porch/Canopy Columns
• Columns are typically 4x4 or 6x6 lumber
which is decoratively shaped to depict a base,
shaft, and capital.
• Metal columns are acceptable.
• Decoratively braced columns are
recommended.
Color Palette
The wide range of colors which might have been used
for exterior decoration in the late 1800's are well
represented in the Sherwin-Williams Preservation
Exterior Palette (see the appendices section of the
Specific Plan). These are historic 19th Century hues
that capture the grace and elegance of that era.
Buildings of this style may remain unpainted, however
painting is encouraged. While use of these colors is
recommended, other similar colors will be considered.
The Director may also identify other color palettes for
Old Town that have the potential to achieve the same
results.
Figure V-81 a, b, c, d: Examples of upper story windows.
IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-54
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-55
D. PARKING LOT/PARKING STRUCTURE
DESIGN GUIDELINES
Parking lots and parking structures are an integral
component of a healthy and functioning urban downtown.
Well designed, safe and functional parking facilities are
imperative for maintaining a pedestrian-oriented urban
core in the Old Town area. Parking lots and parking
structures that are designed as an integral part of the urban
environment, and compliment the surrounding buildings
and structures in the area, not only fulfill the practical
need for parking in Old Town, but also support
accessibility to local businesses and sustain local
commerce.
Integrated parking facilities contribute to vibrant streets
and maintain the activity that is anticipated from the
pedestrian-oriented urban development projects that will
continue to occur in Old Town. Well designed and
integrated parking facilities are required, regardless of
location in the Old Town area. The following design
guidelines are intended to provide clear recommendations
for the design and aesthetic quality expected for the
construction of parking lots and parking garages in Old
Town.
1. Parking Lot Orientation
a. Surface parking lots and parking structures should be
located so that they are screened or are designed to be
architecturally compatible and fully integrated with the
existing buildings along the streetscape. Parking lots and
parking garages should not be located immediately
adjacent to the street without screening or architectural
integration.
b. It is recommended that surface parking lots be located
50 feet behind the build-to line in order to provide for the
placement of a building in front of the parking area to
adequately screen the parking lot from public view.
Twenty feet is the minimum.
c. Parking lots should be screened by building facades and
are required to be located out of the public’s view. Off-
street surface parking lots or parking areas are not
permitted to be placed in front of a building façade.
d. Parking lots and/or parking structures should be
located, as much as possible, to the rear of a project site or
property.
e. Off-street parking facilities should be designed so that a
car within a facility will not have to enter a street to move
from one location to any other location within the same
parking facility.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-82 (above, right) shows an example of
parking facilities that are screened from the street by
the building façade and are architecturally integrated
into the design of the building. This
design/configuration is encouraged in Old Town to
preserve the integrity of the pedestrian environment.
20 feet min.
Figure V-83: Example of encouraged parking layout
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-56
2. Joint Parking Facilities Encouraged
a. Joint parking between adjacent businesses and/or
developments is strongly encouraged.
b. Joint parking should be considered when it has been
determined that the shared land uses within a
Development Project will not be in conflict with one
another.
c. Common driveways that provide vehicular access to
parking facilities that serve more than one site or business
are strongly encouraged.
d. Clear, easy to understand circulation patterns should be
utilized to allow drivers and pedestrians to move safely
through all parking areas. Where parking areas are
connected, interior circulation should provide a consistent
direction of travel and consistent layout of parking bays to
reduce conflict points.
3. Parking Lot Design
a. All parking lots and parking structures should be
architecturally integrated and/or fully screened to enhance
the urban, pedestrian-oriented environment in Old Town.
b. Parking should be internalized behind buildings and
away from the street.
c. Underground, podium style or tuck under parking
configurations are encouraged in order to integrate the
parking facilities into the building design and maximize
the use of property in Old Town.
d. The installation of shade trees within internal at grade
parking areas is encouraged to provide shade, minimize
the heat island effect and soften the expanses of hardscape
within the parking area. Shade trees should be placed
within landscape diamonds and within parking lot
landscape planters.
e. Clearly marked pedestrian walkways should be
provided in all parking facilities in Old Town. Pedestrian
walkways shall be safe, well lit, and visually attractive.
The use of decorative, stamped, or colored concrete or
paving is encouraged to delineate designated pedestrian
walkways.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-84: Example of shared
parking layout. Parking lots should be
shared between adjacent businesses.
Common driveways should be provided
to serve more than one site/business.
Business 1 Business 2
Business 3 Business 4
Shared Parking
Area
Figure V-86: An example of building design that fully
integrates the parking facilities into the building façade.
Parking is provided but is well screened from the street.
Parking garages should be fully integrated into the
building design and architecture in Old Town.
Figure V-85: Tuck-under parking is encouraged
in Old Town
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-57
f. Parking areas should be separated from buildings by
either a six-inch raised walkway or landscaped strip,
preferably both. Parking spaces which directly abut the
building are not permitted.
g. Parking facilities should be designed so that pedestrians
walk parallel to moving cars. Parking facilities should be
designed to minimize the need for the pedestrian to cross
parking aisles.
h. Trash enclosures, utilities and other objects that are
located in parking areas should be placed so that they
make the least negative aesthetic impact, maintain the
pedestrian oriented environment, and do not block the
line-of-sight for motorists.
i. The installation of solar panels is encouraged, when
feasible, on the top deck of all parking garages, and on the
top deck of at-grade carports and other parking facilities
that could accommodate the installation of solar panels.
The solar panels should be architecturally integrated into
the design of the parking facility.
4. Site Access/Driveways
a. Parking lot or parking structure access points taken
directly from Old Town Front Street or Main Streets are
discouraged in order to avoid breaking up the building
facades along the street and to avoid pedestrian/vehicular
conflicts.
b. It is encouraged that access to surface parking facilities
and parking structures be provided through rear alleyways
in Old Town.
c. Parking facility access points, whether located on front
or side streets should be located as far as possible from
street intersections. The minimum distance recommended
is 150 feet, but is subject to the review and approval of the
City’s traffic engineer.
d. Parking facility driveways should align with existing or
planned median openings and/or adjacent driveways or
streets.
e. All parking facilities in Old Town should provide a
minimum 40-foot stacking distance between the edge of
the travel lane and the first parking space.
f. Common driveways that provide access to more than
one site are strongly encouraged in order to allow for joint
parking opportunities.
g. Turn radiuses and drive aisle width to be determined by
Fire Department.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-87: Street Cross Section Showing Mid-Block Parking
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-58
5. Parking Facility Design for Residential Projects
a. At grade parking facilities that are provided for
residential development projects should be located at least
20 feet behind the build-to line to provide adequate space
for the placement of residential units or structures in front
of the parking areas in order to adequately screen the lot
from public view.
b. When at-grade garages or carports are provided for
residential uses, the attached or detached garages or
carports should be located to the rear of the building or
unit in order to avoid garage-dominated building facades.
At-grade garages or carports should not be visible from or
directly face the right-of-way or street.
c. Alley loaded garages or tuck under parking is
encouraged for residential development projects that
require covered parking in Old Town.
d. Carport structures are encouraged when the top deck of
a carport structure is designed as an outdoor amenity to be
utilized as a usable passive open space area, community
garden, tot lot, native landscape garden, or other outdoor
amenity.
e. For all residential projects in Old Town, vehicular
access to residential garages should be provided through
an existing public alley or through a newly created private
alleyway.
f. If there is not an existing alley and a new alleyway
cannot be created through project site design and layout, a
side driveway should be provided for access to the
parking areas located behind the building façades or
structures on-site.
g. If residential garages are provided in any zoning district
they may be either attached or detached from the primary
residential structure.
h. Underground, tuck-under or podium style parking
facilities are encouraged to be incorporated into multi-
family residential projects in all zones to maximize the
use of property in Old Town.
i. The installation of shade trees within internal at grade
parking areas is encouraged to provide shade, minimize
the heat island effect and soften the expanses of hardscape
within the parking area. Shade trees should be placed
within landscape diamonds and within parking lot
landscape planters.
Figure V-88 a (top): Alley loaded garages that are
screened from the street are encouraged for residential
projects in Old Town.
Figure V-88 b (bottom): Pedestrian access to parking
areas should be integrated into the building façade.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-59
6. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Considerations/Guidelines
a. Encourage efficient site design and spatial layout of
development projects in Old Town that create
opportunities to address WQMP requirements within all
parking facilities by utilizing various water quality
measures such as: bio-swales, pervious pavement
(including decorative interlocking pavers, porous
concrete, and pervious asphalt), cisterns, detention pipes,
grass pave systems, decorative rock swales, and mini-bio
cells, as warranted based upon site conditions and
individual project characteristics.
b. Balance the installation of impervious surfaces with
pervious surfaces within all parking facilities in Old
Town. The use of pervious asphalt, porous concrete or
decorative inter-locking pavers are encouraged to be used
in parking facilities whenever possible, and as required by
the Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the
project.
c. The use of decorative pavers as water quality measures
are encouraged within parking stalls, pedestrian
walkways, vehicular entry points, pedestrian crossings,
shopping cart corrals, and may also accent landscape
areas or bio-swales. Pavers utilized as water quality
measures should be decorative in nature and enhance and
beautify the built environment.
d. The combined use of decorative pavement treatments
such as decorative inter-locking pavers and grass pave
systems, combined with treatments that have a utilitarian
appearance, such as porous concrete and pervious asphalt,
are encouraged to be used as water quality measures in all
parking facilities in Old Town.
e. Decorative interlocking pavers should be used to
highlight pedestrian paths of travel, vehicular entry points,
exit points and parking stalls, to provide aesthetic interest
and achieve compliance with water quality management
requirements.
g. “Zero curbs” or breaks in 6” tall curbs may be allowed,
when combined with other decorative water quality
measures, in order to accommodate drainage and
infiltration as warranted by stormwater management
requirements and unique project and/or site
characteristics.
g. Covered at-grade parking facilities are encouraged
within Old Town and should be considered as a means to
achieve WQMP requirements.
h. The overall layout and structural integrity of carports or
other similar structures that cover parking lots in Old
Town should be designed to allow for usable outdoor
amenity space on the top deck of the structure. Outdoor
amenities such as passive open space areas, community
gardens, tot lots, native landscape gardens, and other
outdoor amenities are encouraged to be installed on the
top deck of carports or similar structures to meet water
quality management requirements and reduce the amount
of uncovered impervious parking lot surfaces in Old
Town.
i. Ribbon gutters within parking areas are encouraged to
be made of pervious or porous pavement including porous
concrete, pervious asphalt or decorative interlocking
pavers when feasible, and when no conflict exists with
underground utilities.
j. Water quality treatments should be maintained, as
recommended by industry standards, in order to ensure
optimal functionality, infiltration and treatment.
Figure IV-90: Example of decorative pavers used within
a vehicular driveway.
Figure V-89: Permeable ribbon gutters may be
used within parking lots as a water quality
management treatment.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-60
(This page is left blank intentionally).
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 61
E. URBAN LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES
The placement of urban landscaping in Old Town is
intended to achieve three specific design objectives: 1) to
establish a uniform urban streetscape in Old Town, 2) to
soften mixed-use, commercial, civic, and residential
development within Old Town’s urban context and 3)
establish an environment in Old Town that is pleasant and
comfortable for pedestrians, residents and visitors.
These landscape design objectives will be accomplished
by employing a variety of urban landscape treatments in
Old Town. Specific types of landscape treatments shall be
selected as deemed appropriate based upon the type of
development that is anticipated in each zone. These
various landscape treatments may include, but are not
limited to, the uniform placement of potted plants and
hanging plants in the Downtown Core,
Residential/Limited Mixed-Use, and Civic land use
districts, as well as more traditional landscape treatments,
such as raised and at-grade landscape planters within the
Neighborhood Residential zoning district and for
residential projects in Old Town.
Additionally, consistency and continuity will also be
achieved along the streetscape in Old Town through the
placement of an orderly and uniform street tree selection.
Street tree requirements are discussed in greater detail in
Chapter IV – Land Use and Development Standards, in
the Circulation and Streetscape Standards subsection of
this Specific Plan.
1. General Landscape Guidelines
All development projects in Old Town should follow
these general landscape guidelines:
a. All landscape treatments shall be placed in accordance
with the established Sidewalk Zones. The establishment
of the “Sidewalk Zones” in Old Town is shown in Figure
IV-63 in Chapter IV in the Circulation and Streetscape
Standards section of the Specific Plan.
b. Encourage the use of native plant varieties that are low
maintenance and drought tolerant.
c. The use of boxed, potted, or hanging plants in
decorative clay or wood containers, or similar urban
landscape treatments, should be used in the Downtown
Core, to enhance the public realm and maintain pedestrian
movement in the “Pedestrian Zone” along the sidewalks
in Old Town.
d. For projects that include second, third or fourth floor
open air balconies, terraces, eating areas, or gallery
walkways that are visible from the street, the use of urban
landscape treatments, such as potted and/or hanging
plants, planter boxes and flower boxes are encouraged to
soften the building façade. The use of green roof
technology is encouraged to be used in combination with
open air eating areas, balconies, and terraces, located
above the first floor.
e. For mixed-use projects in the Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use zoning district, the use of boxed, potted or
hanging plants is also encouraged. The use of flower
boxes, climbing vines or other treatments that might
soften the residential portions of a project should also be
used.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Urban landscape treatments such as decorative clay
or wooden plant containers, planter boxes, and
hanging plants should be used in Old Town to
soften the building façade, highlight building
entryways and add interest along the streets.
Figure V-91: Examples
of urban landscape
treatments.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 62
f. Attached and detached residential projects should
employ a combination of urban and traditional landscape
treatments. Traditional treatments include above and at-
grade and/or raised landscape planters, berms, and a
combination of trees, shrubs, groundcover, and flowering
plants. These landscape treatments should generally be
used in areas that are internal to the project and located
away from the street.
g. Traditional landscape treatments such as at-grade
planters, raised planters, and landscape berms may be
appropriate where building setbacks allow adequate space
for such plantings.
h. A combination of both traditional and urban landscape
treatments may be placed within the “Frontage Zone” for
projects that include courtyards, stoops, or outdoor patio
areas that front the street.
i. Urban landscape treatments are encouraged to be used
along the street, adjacent to the building façade within the
“Frontage Zone.” A variety of urban landscape treatments
that might be appropriate include, but are not limited to,
potted plants, hanging plants, and green roof technology,
where appropriate.
j. The use of freestanding earthen berms or earthen berms
located against the building façade is considered a
suburban landscape method and should not be used in Old
Town adjacent to the sidewalk or street. However, these
types of landscape treatments may be appropriate when
used in areas internal to the project site.
k. Landscaping placed along the streets or sidewalks in
Old Town should not impede pedestrian movement and
comfort. Small raised planters (in the Neighborhood
Residential zone only), potted plants or hanging plants
should be used and placed within the “Frontage Zone”
and shall not encroach more than 3 feet over the build-to
line.
l. The use of colorful plantings placed in planter boxes at
the base of the buildings should be used to create focal
points. The planters should be located as to not impede
pedestrian movement. It is recommended that these
planters be placed adjacent to the building facade in the
“Frontage Zone” and shall not encroach more than 3 feet
over the build-to line.
m. When covered parking (carport structures, parking
garages, etc.) is provided for a development project in Old
Town, it is encouraged that the top deck of such a
structure be designed as a landscape amenity when
appropriate or feasible.
n. The use of limited accent landscaping in pots, small
planters or boxes, and hanging landscape treatments,
should be provided between the front of the building and
the public right-of-way for all projects in the Downtown
Core. Accent landscaping should not encroach more than
3 feet over the build-to line. All landscaping adjacent to
the street should be urban in nature and maintain the
pedestrian character of the streets.
o. Urban accent landscaping treatments should be placed
to define building entries and highlight the architectural
elements of the buildings in Old Town.
p. Freestanding landscape elements such as trellises,
arbors, and other special landscape materials may be used
to add character to the urban environment. They are
encouraged to be used to define yard spaces for residential
and non-residential projects in Old Town. They should
not be used adjacent to the sidewalk or street.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-92 (right): Example of accent landscaping
in potted plants provided in the “frontage zone”
between the front of the building and the public right
of way. Accent landscaping should not encroach more
than 3 feet into the “Frontage Zone.” Landscaping
should not be placed in the “Street Furnishing Zone.”
Figure V-93: Example of “traditional” landscape
treatments most appropriate for residential development
projects in the in Old Town.
Correct placement of
landscape treatments
in the “Frontage
Zone.”
Incorrect placement of
landscape treatments in
the “Street Furnishing
Zone”
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 63
q. It is encouraged that above grade landscape planters be
designed to also function as a pedestrian seating area
where appropriate.
r. Landscaping material, such as climbing vines and
shrubs are the preferred method to soften and screen the
view of storage areas, trash enclosures, and public utility
equipment.
s. Landscaping should not obstruct the sightlines of
motorists or pedestrians, especially at pedestrian
crosswalks.
t. Trees and shrubbery on private property should not be
located so that they interfere with the effectiveness of
parking lot lights, street lighting, or conflict with street
trees.
u. Plant materials used for screening should be large
enough at the time of installation to provide effective
screening, and be capable of growing to the height and
density desired within a reasonable period of time.
v. Provide complete automatic sprinkler or drip irrigation
systems for all development projects in accordance with
citywide water efficient landscaping and irrigation
requirements.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figures V-95 a,
b, and c:
Various
examples of
landscape
treatments.
Combinations of
potted and
hanging plants
are encouraged
to be used in
Old Town. These
are considered
urban landscape
treatments.
Figure V-94: Example of hanging planters
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 64
2. General Landscape Material Guidelines
All development projects should exhibit consistency with
these general landscape material guidelines:
a. Select ground covers, plant types and species which
require little maintenance and are drought tolerant.
b. Authentic flower and vegetable gardens may be
developed to add to the historic character of Old Town.
c. Community vegetable and flower gardens are
encouraged to be planted for residential projects and
residential mixed-use projects. Community gardens may
count toward meeting the private open space requirement
for residential projects in Old Town.
d. The use of climbing vines and other climbing plant
types are encouraged to be used to soften building
facades, perimeter garden walls, and other building walls,
but should not be used in lieu of decorative wall
treatments or architectural enhancements. Plant types that
may be appropriate for this purpose include bougainvillea,
grape ivy, and wisteria vines. Bougainvillea should only
be used when it has been determined by the City’s
landscape architect that the manner in which they are
placed on a site does not make them subject to freeze.
e. The use of inorganic materials such as crushed rock,
decorative interlocking pavers, redwood bark chips,
pebbles, river rock, and stone or masonry slabs should be
used in combination with organic plant materials in
landscape areas.
3. Old Town Plant Palette
A plant palette has been developed specifically for the
Old Town area. The required plant palette list is in
Appendix B of this Specific Plan document.
4. Tree Preservation in Old Town
The treatment, relocation or removal of any Heritage Tree
(as defined by the City’s Heritage Tress Ordinance) in the
Old Town Specific Plan area, shall be completed in
accordance with this ordinance.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-96 a,b: Examples of drought tolerant
landscaping
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 65
5. Water Quality Management Considerations/
Guidelines
The following guidelines should be considered when
designing water quality management plans and landscape
plans for projects in Old Town:
a. Utilize landscape areas as stormwater treatment
facilities to actively capture and treat run-off from
impervious surfaces.
b. Landscape designs should consider including a variety
of water quality Best Management Practices (BMPs) to
achieve water quality requirements. Potential BMPs that
may be included as part of the landscape design for a
developmet project include: bio-swales/vegetated swales,
decorative rock swales, rain gardens, mini bio-cells,
infiltration/flow through planters, decorative interlocking
pavers, and grass pave systems.
c. Encourage efficient site layout in order to maximize the
utilization of various BMPs which may be incorporated
into the various landscape areas on a project site.
d. Sites should be designed to drain stormwater run-off
and roof drains into landscaped water quality treatment
areas in order to minimize underground pipe
infrastructure.
e. Consider the use of rain barrels or cisterns for
development projects in Old Town. These treatments may
be able to facilitate the collection of stormwater on site for
re-use as landscape irrigation.
f. Landscape should be designed as water quality
management treatments. These treatments should be used
within parking areas adjacent to pedestrian pathways,
within landscape planters throughout parking areas and
other landscape areas. Infiltration-based water quality
management treatments should not be placed adjacent to
building foundations.
g. Encourage that the design of various landscape BMP
treatments be based upon the project sites’ contextual land
use, unique site characteristics and constraints.
h.Water quality management treatments should be
maintained, as recommended by industry standards, in
order to ensure optimal functionality, infiltration and
treatment.
Swales are
shallow
landscaped areas
designed to
capture, convey
and infiltrate
stormwater
runoff as it moves
downstream.
Figure V-98: Rock Swale
Rain Gardens are shallow landscape areas that
collect, slow, filter and absorb large volumes of water
and delay discharge into the watershed system.
Figure V-97: Rain Garden
Figure V-99: Flow-through
Planter
Flow-through
planters are
contained in
landscape areas
and are designed
to capture and
retain stormwater
runoff.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V- 66
6. Green Roof Technology Design Considerations
Green roof technologies should be employed whenever
feasible in Old Town. The following guidelines should be
considered when a green roof is designed as a part of a
development project:
a. The use of green roof technology is encouraged to
minimize the urban heat island effect, provide a means for
effective stormwater management, and reduce the amount
of energy consumed for cooling.
b. The slope and maximum load of the roof structure
should be considered when determining the feasibility of
green roof technology for development projects in Old
Town.
c. Adequate access should be provided to the green roof
for installation, maintenance and fire protection. Access to
the green roof is encouraged to allow the public to
observe and enjoy the green roof, however if public
access is not feasible due to structural constraints it is
encouraged that the green roof be visible from a nearby
vantage point or observation tower.
d. A waterproof roof membrane should be used in
conjunction with a physical root barrier to form the base
layer of the green roof.
e. The drainage methods employed for a green roof should
be designed to capture water for later use or re-use. The
use of cisterns or other capture methods that pass the
water from the green roof to other planted areas around
the perimeter of the building, or located in other areas on
the project site should be considered. Capturing water to
irrigate the green roof during dry periods is also
encouraged.
f. Plant materials utilized on green roofs in Old Town
should consider the unique climatic conditions of the area.
In general, the plant materials that are utilized on green
roofs in Old Town should exhibit the following
characteristics: perennial or self-sowing, native and
drought tolerant, wind resistant, able to withstand extreme
temperatures, requires minimal mowing, trimming,
fertilizers or pesticides, is fire resistant, and has a shallow
root structure. Additionally, the use of succulents such as
sedums and sempervivums are encouraged on green roofs
in Old Town.
g. Plant materials are encouraged to be installed in
vegetation mats, in vegetation boxes, as plugs or potted
plants, or as seeds or sprigs.
h. The roof membrane, plant materials, irrigation,
drainage and other items such as but not limited to
cisterns and root barriers, making up the total green roof
system shall be continuously maintained and cared for
over the life of the green roof as required by industry
standards.
i. Irrigation installed on a green roof is encouraged to be
designed to minimize water use. Appropriate plant
selection combined with the use of efficient irrigation
techniques such as a drip irrigation system is encouraged
on all green roofs in Old Town.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-101:
Example cross
section of a
“green roof”
Figure V-100: Example “green roof”
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-67
F. PUBLIC ART DESIGN GUIDELINES
What is Public Art?
Public art is a creative work that is part of the public
experience and integrated into the built and natural
environment.
The expansion, cultivation and preservation of a diverse
pubic art collection in Old Town is essential to the
enhancement of the built environment and quality of life
in the area. There is a firm commitment to providing high
quality, relevant public art while preserving Old Town’s
historical context and unique character. The careful
balance of development with artistic and cultural
expression within the planning area will achieve a strong
cultural identity, animate the public realm and celebrate
creativity and innovation. Public art can be a memorable
and energetic part of the public domain and can contribute
to making Old Town a dynamic and vibrant place within
the City of Temecula.
Why is Public Art important?
Public art creates a sense-of-place and collective
community identity. It enhances the public realm and
encourages social gathering and interaction. It provides
opportunities for community members to use open and
public spaces actively, meet and mingle with others, and
participate in everyday community interactions. It
promotes a sense of civic pride and beautifies the
pedestrian environment. Public art also adds interest to
the public realm by reflecting cultural diversity, rich
historical heritage and distinct identity. All of these things
contribute to a high quality of life in Old Town and play
an important role in the success of an eclectic urban
community.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-102: Example of public art.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-68
Art in Public Places Requirement
As a result of the City’s acknowledgement that public art
is an important component of a community, an Art in
Public Places ordinance was adopted. Through this
ordinance, the City of Temecula requires that all private
development projects contribute a percentage of the
overall project cost to enhance the visual appeal of the
City through public art. Developers may elect to place
original artwork on their project site, off-site in a location
other than the project site, or pay the public art in-lieu fee.
These funds are used to place original works of art in the
public realm which further enhances the aesthetic quality
of the city. Proposals for public art in Old Town are
subject to the review and approval of the Community
Services Commission and must comply with the
following guidelines, as well as the requirements outlined
in the Public Art Ordinance and Art in Public Places
Developer Guidelines.
1. Location of Public Art
Public art in Old Town may be located in a wide range of
public spaces. Appropriate locations may include new and
existing residential neighborhoods, civic and community
buildings, new and existing commercial, retail and mixed-
use developments, schools, childcare centers and other
educational facilities, as well as within natural
environments and open spaces such as parks, play areas
and creek trails.
The placement of public art within the Old Town area is
encouraged on both private and public property. Public art
may be displayed in an exterior location on a privately
developed project site in a manner that complements the
surrounding development and buildings, while
maintaining accessibility to the general public. Public art
may also be placed off-site, as consistent with the Public
Art Ordinance. This allows for public art to be located on
a site other than that of a development project.
The following guidelines should be considered for
locating public art in Old Town:
a. Artwork shall be appropriate to the community context
and sited to carefully respond to the local area.
b. It should also be located to support the amenities of the
public environment, help orient people, and create
opportunities for social exchange.
c. Public art should be situated in highly visible locations
that are accessible to the public as consistent with the
Public Art Ordinance. If public art is placed on private
property then it must be accessible to the public. The
location of public art on a site should also consider the
safe and easy maintenance of the artwork.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figures V-103a, b, c: Examples of public art.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-69
d. Public art is encouraged to be placed throughout the
Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Area. Public art
should create a “focal point” for community spaces and is
encouraged in all gathering areas, civic plazas and public
buildings. Sites may also include major intersections,
traffic islands or medians, streets, transit corridors,
alleyways, major pedestrian corridors or paseos located
within the Old Town Specific Plan Area.
e. Locations such as pocket parks, trails, or other
specifically designed settings to accommodate particular
art pieces are also ideal public art locations.
f. Public art locations may also include surface areas such
as, but not limited to, building walls, retaining walls,
gates, bridges, doors, street furniture, and signage that is
consistent with the signage design guidelines for the Old
Town area.
g. A developer may elect to site permanent artwork as a
part of a development project. However, artwork sites for
public art that are not a part of a development project may
also be selected for their aesthetic possibilities or as
recommended and approved by the Community Services
Commission.
h. The location/placement of public art displays can also
be expanded by an artist’s creative ability to extend the
possibilities for public art, as determined on a case-by-
case basis by the Community Services Commission.
“Art is an expression of the creative spirit, of our
endless capacity to see the world with wit and
imagination, to be innovative with materials and
technologies, and to provide an engaging
commentary on the time in which we live”
-Marla Guppy
Cultural Planner
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-70
Community Services Public Art Subcommittee list of
potential locations for public art in Old Town:
On October 28, 2008 the Community Services Public Art
Subcommittee reviewed a list of potential locations for
public art in Old Town. The list of recommended
locations, outlined below, was developed by the
collaborative efforts of the Planning Department,
Community Services Department, and members of the
Community Services Commission.
This is not an exhaustive list of possible locations;
however the following locations are recommended for
future public art displays in Old Town:
• Along the walking trail, located north of the Old
Town Gateway, adjacent to Murrieta Creek and
Old Town Front Street
• At the post office northeast corner of Moreno
Road and Old Town Front Street
• At Sam Hicks Monument Park located on the
northeast corner of Moreno Road and Mercedes
Street
• At the west end of 5th Street at the convergence
of Murrieta Creek
• At the southeast corner of Felix Valdez Road
and Sixth Street
• At the Old Town Community Theater site
located east of Murrieta Creek and north of
Main Street
• At Pennypickle’s Workshop - Temecula
Children’s Museum located east of Murrieta
Creek and north of Main Street
• At the Civic Plaza located at Main Street west
of Mercedes
• At the west end of 3rd Street east of Murrieta
Creek
• At the northeast and northwest corner of Front
Street and First Street
• At the northeast corner of Pujol Street and Main
Street
• Along the sidewalks and streetscapes throughout
Old Town
• At new development projects throughout Old
Town
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-105: Example of a public art display.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-71
2. Symbolic and Thematic Content
“Artwork” is defined as an original creation of physical
art including without limitation a mobile, mosaic, mural,
painting, sculpture or tapestry. Artwork may be realized
through such mediums as bronze, ceramic tile, concrete,
stained glass, and electronics, steel or wood. An artwork
may be an integral part of a building or public space,
whether attached to, interior of, or external to a building.
Art pieces may be of significant scale or be integrated
into urban elements. For the purposes of this plan, a broad
definition of artwork is used to promote creativity and
innovation.
The following guidelines should be considered for the
symbolic and thematic content of public art displays in
Old Town:
a. The thematic content of the art pieces in Old Town are
encouraged to be eclectic and celebrate the energy of the
urban environment in Old Town.
b. A broad thematic and symbolic scope of artwork is
encouraged to enhance the visual and aesthetic interest of
the public realm in Old Town.
c. Public art pieces or displays in Old Town may relate to,
and represent the rich legacy and heritage of the
Temecula Valley. Literal and abstract representations of
local history may be appropriate depending on the
locations and surrounding development.
d. Art displays are encouraged to be as diverse as the
neighborhoods in which they are placed.
e. Public art should respond to the themes of people and
place – both past and present. It is encouraged that the art
displays respond to the social history of the locality, as
well as depicting visions and artwork representative of its
future.
f. Thematic and symbolic content of the artwork shall
complement and be in harmony with the physical
surroundings, buildings and development and be placed in
a manner that respects the spatial constraints of the site or
development.
g. Opportunities for art that responds to the challenges of
climate change through sustainable design, materials, and
processes are encouraged. Opportunities for creative
projects to engage the community in its participation and
awareness of sustainability and environmentally
responsible practices are also encouraged.
Figure V- 106a:
Example of public art display that responds
to the themes of people and place – both
past and present.
Figure V-106b:
Examples of various art pieces depicting a broad
thematic and symbolic content of artwork.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-72
3. Mosaics and Murals-
a. The pictorial designs of these artistic works should
complement the color and architectural composition of
the buildings on which they are painted. Mosaics and
murals should also be compatible with adjacent
structures, buildings and development features.
b. Ideal facades for murals are windowless walls that are
two or more floors in height.
c. Mosaics and murals may also be integrated and
designed as an integral part of a decorative wall, retaining
wall, landscape feature or other blank wall space as
deemed appropriate by the Community Services
Commission.
d. Wall mural signs may be painted on the façade of a
building to satisfy the public art requirement as approved
by the Community Services Commission. Wall mural
signs may be painted on the building façade facing the
“secondary” side streets or on the building façade facing
an alleyway. Wall mural signs are subject to design
review by the Planning Director prior to approval by the
Community Services Commission through the application
of a Minor Modification. Wall Mural-Style signs shall not
be placed on the front facing building façade. Wall mural-
sign graphics may include all types of professional
artwork including mosaics, murals, painted art, or
combination thereof. Printed graphics or decals, or any
type of adhesive polycarbonate/plastic or laminated
material, is strictly prohibited. Wall Mural-Style signs
are intended to accurately replicate wall graphics related
to commercial activities duplicating painted wall signage
from the late 1800s or early 1900s.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figures V-107a,b,c:
Examples of a wall
mural and wall mural
signage.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-73
4. Sculptures and Monuments -
a. Sculptures may be freestanding, wall supported or
suspended.
b. Pieces may be representative of historical figures and
events related to the Temecula Valley. This is encouraged
if the sculpture or monument is proposed to be located on
a historic site, or adjacent to a historical structure or
building.
c. Pieces may reflect a broad thematic and symbolic
content but are required to be in harmony with the
surrounding development, buildings and structures and
shall complement and enhance the area in which they are
placed.
d. Sculptures and monuments shall be placed in a manner
that respects the spatial relationship of its surroundings.
5. Lighting Displays-
a. Lighting used as artistic displays is allowed in Old
Town to enhance the public realm.
b. Lighting displays can also be constructed and
integrated with other artistic works to enhance a sculpture
or monument, or may stand alone as a primary display.
c. The displays must be compatible with surrounding land
uses and development, and shall not have a negative
impact on surrounding uses, buildings, businesses or
structures. The placement of lighting displays are
discouraged adjacent to residential development unless
the lighting display is able to be turned off at a reasonable
time during evening hours as to not disturb adjacent
residents or tenants.
d. Lighting displays are required to be in compliance with
the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
6. Streetscape and Paving Treatments-
a. Streetscape and decorative paving treatments may be
designed by an artist and displayed as public art.
b. A combination of materials and colors may be utilized
for varied interest and design; however the paving
treatments, materials, colors and overall design shall be
carefully designed as not to impede pedestrian, bicycle
and traffic safety, access and circulation.
c. The placement and design of such pieces should be
compatible with the surrounding development and
buildings and placed in a manner that respects the spatial
relationship of its surroundings.
Figure V- 109:
Example of decorative paving designed as public
art displays enhance the streetscape and add
vibrancy to the pedestrian experience.
Figure V-108:
Example of a sculpture created as a public art
display.
Figure V-110:
Example of a lighting display as a public art.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-74
7. Benches and Street Furniture-
a. Benches and street furniture may be customized and
designed as a public art display.
b. Artist designed benches and street furniture should be
placed and designed to enliven public spaces and
encourage social gathering and interaction.
8. Gateways-
a. Gateways should be designed as public art pieces that
create a sense of arrival and sense of destination in the
Old Town area.
b. Gateways may be placed to distinguish certain
neighborhoods and districts within the Old Town area.
c. Gateways should be used to mark certain important
destinations and be designed in a manner that is integrated
with the overall streetscape design strategy.
9. Way-Finders-
a. Way-finders are encouraged to be placed along trails
and creek walks to promote pedestrian interest, activity
and movement. They may also be placed in other areas of
Old Town to promote walkability and thematic ambiance
related to the built environment.
b. Where appropriate, way-finders are encouraged to “tell
a story” along the corridors in which they are placed.
Way-finders are encouraged to be placed along the
Southern Emigrant Trail.
What is a way-finder?
It is a type of public art
display that assists with
the navigation and
movement of pedestrians.
Often times way-finders
are encouraged to “tell a
story” along the
corridors in which they
are placed.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-112:
Example of a gateway.
The gateway arches are
located on the south and
north end of Old Town
Front Street and create a
sense of arrival and
mark the entrance into
the Downtown Core
District in Old Town.
Figure V-111:
Examples of
street furniture
designed as
public art.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-75
10. Landscape Treatments and Raised Seating Walls-
a. Public art displays may be integrated into landscape
treatments and raised seating walls and should encourage
social interaction and civic engagement.
b. These artistic works should complement the color and
architectural composition of surrounding structures,
buildings and development.
11. Other Types of Public Art -
a. It is understood that art can be expanded by an artist’s
abilities, creativity and innovation. As a result, other types
of public art displays in addition to the ones listed above
may be approved on a case-by-case basis as deemed
appropriate and as approved by the Community Services
Commission.
Figure V-113: Example of a decorative wall
created as public art.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-76
(This page is left blank intentionally).
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan V-77
G. OUTDOOR DINING AND SIDEWALK CAFÉ
GUIDELINES
Outdoor dining and sidewalk cafes are defined as any
group of tables and chairs and related decorative and
accessory items situated between the build-to line and
property line in connection with the consumption of
food and beverages sold to the public from an adjoining
restaurant or other eating establishment.
Outdoor dining and sidewalk cafes in Old Town are
anticipated to include a variety of patio-style items and
furniture such as tables, chairs, umbrellas trash
receptacles, fencing, and landscape treatments. The
placement and integration of these items in the public
realm spark pedestrian interest and promote activity in
the Old Town area. The following guidelines provide
clear design recommendations for outdoor dining areas
and sidewalk cafes and include recommendations
related to furniture, umbrellas, outdoor dining area
fencing/gates, and landscape treatments. These
guidelines are intended to supplement the Sidewalk
Café Development Standards that are addressed in the
Supplemental and Special Use Standards of this
Specific Plan (Chapter IV). All outdoor dining areas are
required to comply with the Sidewalk Café
Development Standards and should also demonstrate
conformance with the design guidelines outlined herein.
1. Furniture Guidelines
a. The placement of furniture to accommodate outdoor
dining and sidewalk cafes should comply with the Old
Town Circulation and Streetscape Standards, the
Supplemental Special Use/Sidewalk Café Development
Standards, as well as with the established “Sidewalk
Zones,” contained in Chapter IV.
b. Outdoor dining and sidewalk cafes should be placed
directly in front of the place of business, restaurant or
eating establishment, and directly adjacent to the
building wall. Outdoor dining/sidewalk cafes should be
placed between the build-to line and the property line
within the Downtown Core and Residential/Limited
Mixed-Use Districts.
c. If an outdoor dining area or sidewalk café is placed
within the right-of-way, such as at the western terminus
of Third Street or Fifth Street, the review and approval
of an encroachment permit is required. Outdoor dining
areas and sidewalk cafes should not be placed in the
right-of-way in areas where heavy pedestrian traffic
occurs, especially in the Downtown Core along Old
Town Front Street or Main Street.
d. The placement of outdoor furniture should not
interfere with crosswalks or curb ramps, vehicular
driveways, pedestrian crossings or access into
buildings.
e. Furniture placed to accommodate outdoor dining and
sidewalk cafes should be placed in a manner that
maintains adequate and comfortable pedestrian
movement.
f. Furniture placed within outdoor dining and sidewalk
café areas should be decorative in nature and
architecturally compatible with the surrounding
buildings and structures.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-115: Example of an outdoor dining area
in Old Town.
Figure V-116: Example of a sidewalk café.
Figure V-117: Example of decorative outdoor
furniture.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan V-78
g. The style, color and material selected for the outdoor
dining or sidewalk café furniture fixtures should be
complementary to the fencing selected for the area.
h. Tables and chairs should be comprised of metal, such
as wrought iron, tubular steel or cast aluminum, or of
natural wood or other material that resembles natural
wood, such as wicker. Other materials may be
considered subject to approval by the Director of
Planning on a case-by-case basis, dependant upon the
architectural compatibility, overall design and
appearance of the furniture.
i. All outdoor furniture (tables, chairs, serving stands
and bars) should be of high-quality, and durable design
and material that is suitable for outdoor use.
j. Outdoor furniture should be in scale and consistent
with both the architectural style and colors of the
adjacent building facade.
k. All outdoor furniture should be maintained in good
condition, quality and repair at all times. Tables and
chairs should be moveable and stored indoors when
necessary or as required by the Director of Planning.
l. It is preferred that trash receptacles are housed inside
the main portion of the business and not placed within
outdoor dining areas. However, if outdoor trash
receptacles in these areas are necessary the trash
receptacles should be complementary to the furniture
selected and should be placed in the least conspicuous
location possible.
2. Umbrellas Guidelines
a. Umbrellas shall be made of high quality canvas
material (not plastic, vinyl or aluminum) and be tall
enough to accommodate adequate pedestrian access.
b. Umbrella colors should be monotones compatible
with the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette and be
coordinated with the paint and architecture of adjacent
buildings. Multi-colored designs are discouraged and
should be avoided.
c. The name of the establishment may be printed on the
umbrella valance. Other types of advertising directly
related to the business may be printed on umbrella
valances subject to the review and approval of the
Director of Planning.
d. Umbrellas should be traditional designs that integrate
well with adjacent building architecture.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-118a, b, c & d (left): Examples of
appropriate furniture that may be used as a
part of a sidewalk café or sidewalk café. Figure V-119: Example of umbrellas used to shade
a sidewalk café.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan V-79
e. Wood and metal multi-post canopy structures used
with fabric umbrellas are permitted where historically
appropriate. Review by the Old Town Local Review
Board is required for these installations.
f. Aluminum easy-ups are prohibited except where used
in conjunction with an approved Temporary Use
Permit.
g. The umbrellas should be secured with a base and
should have a minimum clearance of at least 7 feet in
height, measured from the ground level to the lowest
point of the umbrella canopy or framework.
h. Umbrellas should not encroach into the pedestrian
zone.
3. Fencing Guidelines
a. Fencing should be constructed to delineate outdoor
dining and sidewalk café areas in Old Town. Fencing
combined with other barriers, such as landscaping,
potted plants, or small planters may be acceptable on a
case-by-case basis. If alcohol is served within the
outdoor dining or sidewalk café area, secure barrier
fencing surrounding the entire outdoor eating area or
sidewalk café is necessary to meet Temecula Police
Department and Alcoholic Beverage Control
requirements.
b. The fencing that is installed for outdoor dining or
sidewalk café facilities should be architecturally
compatible with the adjacent buildings and structures
and should complement the historical character of Old
Town.
c. Appropriate fencing materials include, but are not
limited to, decorative wrought iron, tubular steel,
natural wood or materials that resemble natural wood,
decorative masonry and landscape planter boxes.
Fences should be decorative in nature and enhance the
built environment. Other materials may be considered
and approved by the Director of Planning on a case-by-
case basis, dependent upon the architectural
compatibility, overall design and appearance of the
fencing materials.
d. When fencing is painted, the paint color should be
selected from the Sherwin Williams Preservation
Palette and should be coordinated with the paint and
architectural style of the adjacent buildings and
structures. Other colors may be considered subject to
the review and approval of the Director of Planning.
e. Natural wood should be sealed with a wood sealant to
preserve the color and finish of the wood and prevent
weathering.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-120: Example of an un-fenced sidewalk café.
Figure V-121 a,b,c: Examples of outdoor
dining areas and sidewalk cafes.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan V-80
f. Gates that are used in conjunction with the fencing
should be of similar color and material as the fencing
and should incorporate appropriate hardware to meet
Building and Fire code requirements.
g. The construction of decorative accent brick or stone
pilasters between stretches of fencing is recommended
to add interest and variety to the outdoor dining or
sidewalk café area. This is especially encouraged when
the pilasters may be able to appropriately tie in building
materials that have been used on the primary structure.
h. One pilaster is recommended for every 8 linear feet
of fencing.
i. The minimum fence height is 36” when alcoholic
beverages will be served within the outdoor
dining/sidewalk café area. It is encouraged that all
fencing in Old Town be between the heights of 36” and
42”.
j. Fencing and gates should be able to withstand outdoor
use and be continually maintained in good condition,
repair and quality at all times.
k. Requirements for Fencing not associated with dining
can be found in Section L.
4. Landscape Treatment Guidelines
a. The use of potted plants, flower boxes, and hanging
plants are encouraged to soften outdoor dining and
sidewalk cafes in Old Town.
b. The incorporation of potted landscaping and/or
landscape planters into the masonry walls/pilasters of
an outdoor dining or sidewalk café area is encouraged.
Flower boxes are encouraged to be used in combination
with barrier fencing.
c. If a solid masonry wall is utilized as the barrier to
delineate an outdoor dining or sidewalk café area, it
should be softened with climbing vines or other
landscape materials.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-122: Example of fencing and landscaping.
Figure V-124 (above): Examples of
landscape treatments that may be
appropriate to soften outdoor eating areas
or sidewalk cafes.
Figure V-123: Example of landscape planter boxes used as
fencing.
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan V-81
5. FENCING NOT ASSOCIATED WITH DINING
a. Appropriate fencing materials for commercial
projects include, but are not limited to, decorative
wrought iron, tubular steel, natural wood or
materials that resemble natural wood, decorative
masonry and landscape planter boxes. Fences
should be decorative in nature and enhance the
built environment. Other materials may be
considered and approved by the Director of
Planning on a case-by-case basis, dependent upon
the architectural compatibility, overall design and
appearance of the fencing materials.
b. All proposed fencing shall require the review and
approval of a Modification Application and any
appropriate building permits.
c. One pilaster is required for every 8 linear feet of
fencing.
d. All fencing in the Downtown Core shall be
between 36” and 42”. Fencing in the
Residential/Limited Mixed Use and Neighborhood
Residential Districts shall be between 36” and 42”
and no higher than 6 feet.
e. Fencing and gates shall be able to withstand
outdoor use and shall be continually maintained in
good condition, repair, and quality at all times.
f. Chain link fencing material is not permitted.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
H. PAVING MATERIAL GUIDELINES
Decorative paving materials such as brick, stamped and/or
colored concrete, decorative interlocking pavers, grass
pavers, and other decorative paving treatments are often
times used to enhance and highlight a variety of different
areas and spaces for development projects in Old Town.
It is recommended that decorative paving materials be
utilized in Old Town to beautify and enhance a variety of
outdoor areas for new development projects and
redevelopment projects. The paving materials that are
selected to be installed in Old Town will reflect the
historical character of the area and compliment the
various architectural styles and elements of a project.
Additionally, the installation of decorative paving
treatments will also be considered in the development and
preparation of Water Quality Management Plans
(WQMPs) and utilized as BMPs (Best Management
Practices) as appropriate, dependant upon the unique
stormwater management characteristics and requirements
of a given development project.
Paving treatments that are installed in Old Town should
achieve three specific design objectives: 1) The type of
paving treatments selected should enhance and
compliment the architectural characteristics of a project;
2) Paving treatments should be strategically located on a
project site to highlight and beautify areas such as
walkways, plazas, paseos, seating areas, parking areas,
courtyards and landscape areas; and 3) Paving treatments
should also be utilized to achieve water quality and
stormwater management requirements.
The Paving Material Design Guidelines, outlined below,
are intended to provide clear design recommendations for
the type of paving material selected for a site, appropriate
locations for decorative paving, and the utilization of
pavement treatments as BMPs to achieve water quality
management requirements in Old Town. The following
guidelines shall be considered during the initial design
and development phase of proposed projects in Old Town:
1. Recommended Paving Treatment Types:
a. The type of paving materials selected for a given
project shall be complementary to the historical context
and architectural style of the building and surrounding
structures.
b. The color, texture, pattern, and overall design of the
paving materials shall complement the architectural
design, color palette and building materials utilized for the
project.
c. The use of paving materials such as, but not limited to,
brick pavers, granite blocks, stone or faux stone tiles,
stamped, textured or colored concrete, cobble stone,
and/or grass pavers are encouraged to be used in Old
Town. The selection of the type of pavement treatments
should consider both the aesthetic quality and design of
the site and building, as well as how the paving treatments
could achieve fulfilling stormwater and water quality
requirements.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-125b: Example of interlocking porous
pavers used to beautify a development project,
highlight outdoor areas, and achieve water quality
management requirements.
Figure V-125a: Example of decorative paving.
Figure V-125c: Example of decorative paving.
V-82
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
d. Combining a variety of colors, textures, paving
patterns, and types of paving materials is encouraged to
add interest and variety to outdoor spaces and to define
and highlight certain development features.
e. The use of porous or pervious paving materials is
encouraged for stormwater management to meet water
quality requirements.
2. Recommended Placement of Paving Materials
a. A variety of paving treatments should be employed to
enhance and define areas such as, but not limited to,
walkways, plazas, paseos, and alleyways, seating areas,
parking lots, courtyards and stoops.
b. Decorative paving materials that are installed along Old
Town Front Street adjacent to the “faux” wooden
boardwalk material shall be complementary to, and
coordinate with, the appearance of wood and should also
complement the building’s architecture, color and
materials.
c. Decorative paving treatments that are installed for a
new development project should be complimentary to
existing adjacent paving treatments located within the
right of way, as well with the existing pavement
treatments located on the site of an adjacent development
project.
d. Decorative paving materials are encouraged to be
installed under galleries, arcades, within forecourts, and
on stoops and porches in Old Town.
e. Decorative paving is encouraged to be installed to
define or highlight outdoor dining areas and sidewalk
cafes.
f. The use of colored, stamped, textured or patterned
pavement treatments is also encouraged to be used within
residential alley loaded garage areas to make the
alleyways less utilitarian.
g. Colored, stamped, and/or textured pavement treatments
should be used at internal vehicular entry drives, internal
vehicular access points, and pedestrian walkways within
parking lots and parking garages.
h. Paving treatments are encouraged to be used to
highlight specific project features such as public art,
landscape areas, and other outdoor gathering spaces.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-126: Examples of decorative pervious paving
materials
Figure V-127: Example of a decorative paving
treatment used to beautify the area under an
arcade.
Figure V-128:
Example of
decorative paving
used to highlight
an open space
area.
V-83
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
i. Limiting the number of paving materials and patterns
used in one place is encouraged in Old Town.
j. The use of decorative paving treatments adjacent to a
building’s main entry points is encouraged to create
pedestrian oriented focal points and define pedestrian
walkways or paseos.
k. Vast expanses of concrete or asphalt, as in parking lots,
are discouraged and should be varied with differing
colors, textures, material types and paving patterns.
3. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
Considerations/Guidelines
a. A combination of impervious decorative paving
treatments and porous or pervious treatments such as
porous concrete, pervious asphalt, interlocking pavers and
grass paver systems should be used to achieve WQMP
requirements.
b. The selection and design of paving treatments in Old
Town should consider utilizing pervious or porous paving
treatments as water quality measures, in conjunction with
decorative impervious pavement treatments, to achieve
water quality management requirements.
c. Where appropriate, rock swales may be combined with
decorative paving treatments to achieve WQMP
requirements.
d. Site Plans prepared for all projects in Old Town should
take a comprehensive approach to water quality
management and coordinate the unique characteristics of
a project’s aesthetics, grading constraints, drainage, soil
conditions, and landscaping in conjunction with the
utilization of paving treatments in accordance with these
guidelines.
e. Water Quality treatments should be maintained, as
recommended by industry standards, in order to ensure
optimal functionality, infiltration and treatment.
f. Roof downspouts should be directed to allow
stormwater to run across pervious pavement treatments
or into landscape planters.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-130:
Examples of
WQMP Paving
Treatments:
Pervious
Concrete
Porous
Asphalt
Interlocking
pervious
pavers
Grass Pave
Systems
Rock swales
Paving treatments in Old Town should serve a dual
purpose: decorative paving should be selected to beautify
and enhance the built environment, and should be
combined with utilitarian water quality treatments, such as
porous concrete, to achieve storm water management
requirements.
Figure V-129: Example of decorative paving applied in
parking stalls, on a walkway and in an open space area.
V-84
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan
(This page is left blank intentionally).
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
V-85
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-85
I. STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES
The purpose of this section is to provide guidelines for
street furnishings and other streetscape elements that are
anticipated to be placed along the streets in Old Town.
The streetscape guidelines for Old Town include an
overview of the sidewalk and street tree concept for Old
Town, as well as specific guidelines for public signage,
and various street furnishings such as benches, trash
receptacles, street lights, bus shelters and other items that
are placed along the street in Old Town. These guidelines
are intended to preserve the pedestrian scale of Old Town
and maintain a uniform environment between the
buildings and the streets.
Old Town is intended to maintain an environment
oriented to the pedestrian. Thus, the ambiance along the
streetscape should meet not only the functional and
utilitarian needs of the pedestrians, but also appeal to the
pedestrian’s sensory perception and spatial awareness of
the built environment. This can be achieved by
maintaining a network of simple, well-defined spaces
along the street. The following guidelines are intended to
provide direction in achieving well defined spaces along
the street and a lively public realm.
1. Sidewalk Concept
The sidewalks in Old Town are intended to establish the
pedestrian as the priority from curb to storefront. In order
to achieve this, “Sidewalk Zones” have been established
for Old Town. The “Sidewalk Zones” (shown in Figure
IV-132) are discussed in greater detail in Chapter IV in
the Circulation and Streetscape Standards section. The
placement of all streetscape elements including street
trees, public signage, street furniture, street lights and bus
shelters, shall be placed in compliance with the
established “Sidewalk Zones” concept.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-132: Established Sidewalk Zones:
Street furnishings should be placed in the appropriate sidewalk
zone to provide unobstructed access in the pedestrian zone. Figure V-131: An example of a pedestrian oriented
streetscape with an outdoor dining area.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-86
2. Street Trees
The uniform and linear placement of street trees in Old
Town is required in order to maintain pedestrian friendly
streets and a downtown urban environment. Street trees
shall be planted in compliance with the Old Town Street
Tree Standards discussed in greater detail in Chapter IV in
the Circulation and Streetscape Standards section of this
Specific Plan.
3. Street Furnishings
Street furnishings and the placement of items such as
benches, streetlights, trash receptacles, and other fixtures,
can enliven the pedestrian environment and provide
interest to the outdoor spaces along the street. Street
furnishings serve an aesthetic and utilitarian function, and
contribute to urban “place-making.” The proper
placement of such amenities, in accordance with the
established “Sidewalk Zones” will reinforce the
pedestrian environment in Old Town and add to the urban
design theme. Street furnishings can create a lively and
festive atmosphere and promote pedestrian movement and
social interaction. The purpose of this section is to provide
guidance on the materials and appearance for street
furnishings and fixtures placed along the street within the
Old Town area.
a. Benches
i. Benches shall be placed in the “Frontage Zone” along
the building façade as to not impede pedestrian movement
or the “pedestrian zone”.
ii. Benches that include decorative elements such as
wrought iron and/or ornamental metal accents are
encouraged.
iii. All benches should be compatible with the character,
architectural style and scale of surrounding buildings and
structures.
iv. Benches with vertical back slats and horizontal seat
slats are preferred in Old Town.
v. Pressure treated or sandblasted wood may be utilized,
however vinyl or plastic benches that have the appearance
of wood are the preferred material for heavy use areas.
vi. If pressure treated or sandblasted wood benches are
utilized the wooden finish or varnish treatment used on
the benches shall be maintained in a “like-new” condition.
Figure V-133:
An example of the linear, uniform placement of street
trees adjacent to the street. This configuration in Old
Town will maintain a comfortable pedestrian
environment along the streets.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-134: Example of a decorative bench.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-87
b. Street Lighting
i. Decorative stylized light fixtures should be placed along
the streets in Old Town.
ii. The preferred street lighting in Old Town is a simple
lantern style light fixture. The light standard applicable in
most situations will be a double posted pole, subject to the
review and approval of the Director of Planning.
iii. Lantern style light fixtures should be compatible with
the surrounding development and are subject to the
approval of the Director of Planning.
iv. Stylized street light fixtures shall be used to achieve a
consistent streetscape. The placement of the same light
fixtures should not abruptly stop when one development
terminates and another commences, regardless of land use
district or project type. The installation of consistent light
fixtures should be considered as a CIP project for the Old
Town area as determined by the Director of Public Works.
v. When parking lot lighting is required, the use of
decorative, double-posted lantern style light fixtures is
encouraged to maintain consistency and a seamless
transition from the public right of way to adjacent private
property.
vi. Decorative double posted light fixtures should be
installed along Murrieta Creek as development
incrementally occurs along the creek channel.
vii. Single posted decorative light fixtures may be used
when appropriate subject to the review and approval of
the Director of Planning.
viii. Tivoli lighting may be draped across seating areas or
across streets on a case-by-case basis subject to the review
and approval of the Director of Planning. Director of
Public Works to approve lighting draped across streets.
ix. Lighting shall comply with the Mount Palomar
Lighting Ordinance 655.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-135
a,b: Examples
of decorative
double posted
lantern style
light fixtures in
Old Town.
Figure V-135 d:
Example of single
posted decorative
lantern style light
fixture.
Figure V-135 c: Example of Tivoli style lighting
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-88
c. Trash Receptacles
i. Trash receptacles shall be placed in the “Frontage
Zone,” and shall not be placed in a manner that impedes
the “pedestrian zone”.
ii. Trash receptacles should resemble a whiskey barrel,
wooden crate or wooden shipping box in order to
maintain the desired historical character of Old Town.
Other trash receptacle designs may be considered subject
to the review and approval of the Director of Planning if
they maintain Old Town’s historic character and are
compatible with the historic architecture and overall
aesthetics in the area.
iii. If a wood finish or varnish is used on trash receptacles,
it shall be maintained in a “like new” condition. The use
of plastic or vinyl that resembles a wooden finish is
encouraged.
iv. If a trash receptacle is placed adjacent to a bench, the
color and material should match or be complementary to
the bench design, color, finish and overall appearance.
v. Trash receptacles should be complementary to the
surrounding buildings and structures and reflect Old
Town’s historic character.
vi. Modern or contemporary trash receptacles that do not
maintain Old Town’s historic character are discouraged
along the street or adjacent to the public right-of-way in
Old Town.
d. Newspaper Racks
i. All newspaper racks located with the boundaries of the
Old Town Specific Plan area shall either be constructed of
rough-hewn wood or a plastic or vinyl faux wood or some
other material that preserves the historical character of the
area.
ii. Newspaper racks constructed of natural wood should
be stained dark or painted with a neutral color selected
from the Sherwin-Williams Preservation Palette as
approved by the Director of Planning. Natural wood
newspaper racks shall be continually maintained in a
“like-new” condition.
iii. In order to maintain an uncluttered streetscape,
newspaper racks shall be located adjacent to the building
façade within the “Frontage Zone” as to not impede
pedestrian movement.
iv. The design of the newspaper racks and facades must
be harmonious with Old Town’s historical character.
v. The placement of newspaper racks shall not block
emergency access, crosswalk entrances, handicapped
access facilities, or store entrances.
vi. The number of individual newspaper dispensers and
racks shall not exceed four.
Figure V-136:
Example of a wooden barrel trash
receptacle. Trash receptacles should
maintain the desired historic character of the
area.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Exhibit V-137:
Newspaper rack designs without the appropriate
surrounds or enclosures are not appropriate in Old
Town.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-89
e. Mailboxes
i. Mailboxes in Old Town shall not be permitted to be
placed along the sidewalk on Old Town Front Street,
Main Street or Mercedes Street.
ii. The mailboxes that are currently located along Old
Town Front Street should be relocated over time to the
side streets or alleys to better accommodate mail delivery
and not impede the free flow of traffic along Old Town
Front Street.
iii. In order to better accommodate mail pick up for
projects located along Old Town Front Street, Main Street
and Mercedes Street, mailboxes should be placed within
parking areas, or in a manner that allows for easy access
by mail carriers, but does not block the free flow of
vehicular traffic.
iv. The clustering of mailboxes in Old Town is
encouraged to allow for more efficient mail pick-up and
delivery.
v. Mailboxes should be designed to be architecturally
compatible with the surrounding buildings, structures and
adjacent development.
f. Bus Shelters
i. Bus shelters in Old Town should be compatible with the
historical context of the Old Town area, as well as with
the surrounding buildings and structures.
ii. The placement and design of bus shelters in Old Town
should be coordinated with the Riverside Transit Agency.
iii. Bus shelters should be constructed primarily of wood
or a similar material that gives the appearance of natural
wood, and should also include a pitched metal corrugated
roof structure. Metal and plexiglass contemporary designs
are not allowed.
iv. Bus shelters should be painted with a durable baked
powder coat finish color RAL 1001 Beige, to be
consistent with the existing bus shelters in Old Town.
v. Metal bus shelters should be phased out as Old Town
continues to develop.
vi. No signage or advertising shall be permitted to be
placed on bus shelters in Old Town.
Figure V-138: Example of clustered mailboxes.
Figure V-139:
This photo
depicts the
suggested style
of bus shelters
in Old Town.
Bus shelters
should be
constructed out
of wood (or
similar
material) and
include a
pitched roof.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-90
g. Parking Meters
i. Parking meters shall be placed within the “Street
Furnishing Zone.”
ii. Parking meters should be placed to serve an expansive
row of street parking. The clustering of parking meters or
the use of parking meters that can track the use of
multiple spaces is encouraged to avoid placing parking
meters at every parking space in Old Town.
iii. The use of the most technologically advanced parking
meters providing a variety of payment methods (coins,
bills, credit cards, etc.) is encouraged to better serve those
parking in Old Town.
iv. Parking meters are encouraged to complement the
surrounding environment and maintain the historic
character of the area to the greatest extent possible.
4. Other street furnishings
Other street furnishings not specifically described herein
may be placed along the street in a manner that is
consistent with the established “Sidewalk Zones.” The
placement of these other streetscape items may be
considered on a case-by-case basis subject to the approval
of the Director of Planning.
b. Preferred
Figure V-140a,b:
Photo examples of
discouraged and
preferred design of
parking meters in Old
Town.
a. Discouraged
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-91
J. ALLEY GUIDELINES
The alleys in Old Town Temecula were created with the
original historical plat and subdivision that was
established in the 1880s. Since that time, many of the
alleys have been eliminated. However, as part of the
revitalization efforts in Old Town, it has been determined
that the remaining alleys should be preserved and
integrated into the existing street grid pattern and
circulation network. The preservation of the alleys in Old
Town will accommodate the movement and circulation of
both pedestrians and vehicles and promote mobility and
walkability in Old Town. The alleys are intended to
support the primary street grid system and act as a
secondary circulation network that will provide additional
vehicular and pedestrian connections throughout Old
Town’s urban core, residential neighborhoods and across
Murrieta Creek. The purpose of this section is to provide
guidance and design considerations related to the use and
aesthetic concept of the alleys within Old Town. The
Alley Guidelines should also be used in concert with the
Alley Standards contained in Section IV.I of this Specific
Plan and in conjunction with the Utility and Infrastructure
Design Guidelines contained in Section V.K of this
chapter.
1. Public Alleyways
The alleys designated for primary vehicular access should
comply with the following criteria:
a. The minimum width of the alleyways in Old Town
shall be twenty (20) feet as consistent with the Alley
Standards contained in Chapter IV of this Specific Plan.
b. Off street parking should not be located within the
alleyways. Alleyways should be used to accommodate the
loading and unloading of large trucks and other
commercial vehicles only.
c. Utility rooms and service doors should take access off
of alleyways whenever possible.
d. The design and layout of buildings in Old Town should
locate trash collection and pick up areas adjacent to the
alleyways in Old Town to best accommodate trash trucks.
e. When a new development project requires off-street
parking, the parking lot should be located off of the
alleyway, behind the property line and at the rear the
building façade.
f. Building “notch-outs” and utility rooms should be
located off of the alleyways to accommodate utility
equipment for new development projects. Above ground
utility equipment should not be placed within the alleys in
Old Town.
g. Additional landscaping may be provided adjacent to the
alleyways behind the property line. No landscaping may
be placed within the 20 foot alleyway.
h. The alleyways should provide vehicular access for
service, loading and unloading, trash pick up, and provide
access to rear parking areas.
i. Businesses may establish secondary patron entrances
from alleyways if an area of at least six feet in width is
provided behind the property line to accommodate door
swing and safe pedestrian movement into and out of the
business.
j. Adequate lighting should be provided within the
alleyways to ensure pedestrian safety and comfort during
evening hours. Alleys are encouraged to be lit with
decorative wall pack light fixtures, gooseneck light
fixtures or some other decorative lighting method to meet
the minimum footcandle requirements contained in the
Alley Standards in Section IV.I of this Specific Plan.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-141: Example of a public alley.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-92
2. Private Alleyways
Private alleyways are encouraged to be created as a part of
a private development project. Private alleyways may be
created, for example, when alley loaded parking or
commercial or residential “paseos” are created as a result
of a project’s site layout. Private alleys may help achieve
the urban environment that is envisioned for Old Town.
When private alleyways are created they should comply
with the following guidelines:
a. Utility equipment should be placed within the private
alleyways.
b. Private alleyways should be created for vehicular
access to parking areas, or to provide internal pedestrian
linkages throughout a project site. Private alleyways
should always connect to the larger street/public alley
circulation network and add to the connectivity and
walkability within the Old Town area.
c. Private alleyways should include water quality
management measures such as decorative pavers,
permeable pavement, and porous asphalt when required to
meet the requirements of a water quality management
plan.
d. The creation of private alleyways should be
coordinated with adjoining property owners to maximize
the number of pedestrian and vehicular connections in Old
Town.
e. Private alleyways are encouraged to incorporate
landscaping and be well lit.
f. Private alleyways may be designed and constructed as a
“pedestrian paseo” to accommodate pedestrian access
only. This is encouraged for multi-family residential
projects, commercial projects, mixed-use projects and
when the land use and project type are likely to result in
heavy pedestrian traffic and the need to accommodate the
movement of pedestrians from the site and onto the larger
street network.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figures V-142 a,b:
Example of a
private commercial
and residential
alley. These may
also be referred to
as private paseos.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-93
K. UTILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN
GUIDELINES
1. Water Service Design Considerations:
a. Underground water plans should be provided to the
City to allow Planning Department staff to verify the
proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check (DDCs) prior to final agreement with the utility
companies.
b. Double detector check valves should be placed above
ground to meet RCWD’s Standard Drawing RW-20.
Double detector checks should be installed in a location
that is internal to the project site at locations not visible
from the public right-of-way, or placed in a manner that
is architecturally integrated into the building design.
c. The placement of DDCs and other water related
utilities in alleyways, parking lots, or within a building
“notch out” (internal to the project site) is encouraged
to better integrate the utility equipment into the
building’s architectural design.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-143:
Example of a building “notch out” to
accommodate utility equipment adjacent to
an alley or on an internal building
elevation.
Figure V-144:
Example of a vertical compact Double
Detector Check (DDC) located on the side
of a building façade.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-94
d. DDCs and other water related utilities should not be
placed adjacent to the sidewalk along the building
facades that face the street. This will ensure safe and
comfortable pedestrian path of travel along the
sidewalks in Old Town.
e. Compact, vertical DDC’s should be used in Old
Town whenever feasible. The use of compact, vertical
FEBCO Master Series 876V Double Detector Check
Assemblies is encouraged, or similar device. (See the
appendices section of this Specific Plan).
f. Landscape construction drawings should show and
label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A
three-foot clear zone should be provided around fire
double detector checks as required by the Fire
Department. Utility equipment should be grouped
together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of
utilities is not to look like an afterthought.
g. DDCs and other water utility equipment should be
placed on private property and not within the right of
way. Easements should be obtained for DDCs and other
water utility equipment when they are placed on private
property.
h. Fire Department Connections shall be wall mounted
on the street side of the building.
Figure V-145:
Example of utility equipment that is
placed in a location that is internal
to the project site. Water service
utility equipment should be placed
behind the property line along
alleyways, within parking lots, side
yards or within a building “notch
out.”
Rear
Alleyway
Figure V-146: DDCs and other water service
utilities should not be located in the pedestrian
path of travel.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Figure V-144 a: Example of a wall
mounted Fire Department Connection.
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-95
2. Electrical Service Design Considerations:
a. As required by Ordinance 04-02, all new electrical
lines up to 34 Kv shall be under-grounded in Old Town.
b. All electrical utility equipment, electrical meters, and
junction boxes are encouraged to be placed within a
utility room. If a utility room is not feasible or
appropriate, ensure that all utility equipment is designed
as an integral part of the building and screened from
public view.
c. Purposeful and aesthetically integrated placement of
electrical meters, junction boxes and other utility
equipment shall be achieved by encouraging that all
equipment be placed adjacent to alleyways, within
parking areas, within rear or side yards, or in a building
“notch out.” All utility equipment should be located out
of the pedestrian path of travel.
d. Narrow lots and urban development standards that
allow for minimal setbacks in Old Town pose
challenges in locating transformers and ensuring
adequate access for service and maintenance by
Southern California Edison. Early coordination with
Southern California Edison should occur in order to
ensure that transformers are placed in a manner that
makes the least aesthetic impact, and to ensure that
transformers are well screened and in compliance with
utility provider’s standards.
Figure V-148a,b:
Above: The placement of
electrical transformers and other
electrical utility equipment along
the street at the front of the
building is discouraged.
Below: Example of an electrical
transformer placed internal to the
site within a parking lot area that
is accessed off of a public
alleyway.
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
Encouraged
Figure V- 147:
Example of an
internal utility
room
Discouraged
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan V-96
3. Natural Gas Service Design Considerations:
a. Ensure safe ingress and egress to gas meters for
maintenance, meter reading, and service while
simultaneously encouraging the placement of
equipment that makes the least aesthetic impact to the
built environment in Old Town.
b. Purposeful and aesthetically integrated placement of
gas meters and other utility equipment should be
achieved by encouraging that all equipment be placed
adjacent to alleyways, within parking areas, rear or side
yards, or within building “notch outs.” All utility
equipment should be located out of the pedestrian path
of travel.
c. Gas meters should be well screened and in
compliance with utility provider’s standards. A 3-foot
wide minimum clearance should be provided when
landscaping is utilized as the screening method.
d. When appropriate, gas meters should be painted to
blend into the built environment.
e. Consultation with Southern California Gas regarding
meter cabinet design guidelines and appropriate
screening methods should occur early in the project
design process.
Figure V-149: Example of utility equipment that is clustered and
placed adjacent to an alleyway.
Rear
Alleyway
V. DESIGN GUIDELINES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-1
CONTENTS:
A. Glossary…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-2
B. Old Town Plant List……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-11
C. Design Guidelines Case Studies…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-45
1. Forecourt Frontage Type………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-46
2. Restoring Street Frontages: Adding to Existing Buildings……………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-47
3. In-fill Building Example………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-48
4. Murrieta Creek Walk……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-49
5. Paseos…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-50
6. Examples of Attached Residential and Mixed-Use Buildings……………………………………………………………………………………. VI-52
7. Existing Example of Successful Mid-Block Parking Behind the Building………………………………………………………………………. VI-55
8. Moreno Road Neighborhood Market……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... VI-56
D. Old Town Parking Management Plan……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… VI-58
E. Examples of Compact Double Detector Check……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. VI-59
F. Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. VI-63
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-2
A. GLOSSARY
This section provides definitions of terms and phrases
used in this Specific Plan that are technical or
specialized, or that may not reflect common usage. If
any of the definitions contained herein conflict with the
City of Temecula Development Code or other
provisions of the City’s Municipal Code, the definitions
contained herein shall apply to the Old Town Specific
Plan area. If a word is not defined in this section or in
other provisions of the City of Temecula Municipal
Code, the Director of Planning shall determine the
definition in the same manner as when determining
whether or not a use is allowed within the Specific Plan
area. The decision can be appealed to the Planning
Commission and/or City Council.
A
Abandoned-The termination of or suspension from
developing or maintaining a building or use for a stated
period of time.
Abandoned Activity-A business or activity with no
reported sales, or production for a period of at least 180
days. Exceptions are temporary closures for repair,
alterations, or similar situations.
Active Frontage-Building space that is usable, active
and leasable and promotes pedestrian activity in Old
Town by facing either a primary street frontage,
secondary street frontage or Murrieta Creek in Old
Town.
Access-The safe, adequate and usable ingress or egress
to a property or use.
Accessory structure-A detached building or structure,
part of a building or structure which is incidental or
subordinate to the main building, structure, or use on
the same parcel, without cooking facilities (e.g. storage
shed, garage, gazebo, etc.)
Adult Business-Shall have the same definition as
Section 5.09.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
A-Frame Sign-A portable temporary advertising device
which is commonly in the shape of an “A” or some
variation thereof, is located on the ground, is easily
moveable, and typically two-sided.
Affordable Housing-A residential unit that is restricted
to occupancy by an income eligible household as
defined by a local, state or federal program, as may be
amended from time to time.
Agent-Any person showing written verification that he
or she is acting for, and within the knowledge and
consent of the property owner.
Alley (private)-A narrow street or passageway
typically used for vehicular access between buildings,
behind a series of buildings, or adjacent to residential
alley loaded garages or parking areas.
Alley (public)-A narrow service way that provides a
permanently reserved but secondary means of public
access to abutting property, providing access to service
areas, trash pickup areas, parking lots, and often contain
utility easements. Alleys are typically located along rear
property lines and may accommodate both pedestrian
and vehicular traffic.
Amenities-A development feature that contributes to
physical or material comfort, and increases
attractiveness, aesthetics, or value or a project.
Apartment-A dwelling sharing a building or a lot with
other dwellings and/or other uses. Apartments may be
for rent or for sale as condominiums.
Arcade-A series of arches supported by columns, piers,
or pillars either freestanding or attached to a wall to
form a gallery.
Architectural Type-(Also see Building Type). A
structure defined by the combination of configuration,
placement and function.
Art Gallery-A room, building or unit devoted to the
exhibition of works of art.
Art Studio-A room, building or unit used as a working
place for an artist.
Articulation-The small parts of portions of a building
form that are expressed (materials, colors, texture,
pattern, modulation, etc.) and come together to define
the structure.
Asymmetry-The irregular correspondence of form and
configuration on the opposite sides of a dividing line or
plane, or about a center on an axis; having unbalanced
proportion.
Attic-The area found directly below the roof of a
building.
Attached-Joined by a wall, especially sharing a wall
with another building; not freestanding or detached.
Awning Sign- A painted or silk-screened, non-
electronic sign attached to an awning or canopy that is
attached to the exterior of a building.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-3
B
Baluster-Any of the small posts that make up a railing,
as in a staircase or as part of a gallery.
Balustrades-The combination of railings held up by
balusters.
Balcony-A platform that projects from the wall of a
building and is surrounded by railings, balustrades or a
parapet.
Belfry-A bell tower feature that is designed to contain
one or more bells, or which is designed to hold bells
even if it has none.
Bar/Cocktail Lounge-An establishment primarily
providing the preparation and retail sales of alcoholic
beverages as licensed by the California Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Bar/Nightclub-An establishment or facility providing
entertainment such as live music, dancing, and/or Disk
Jockey (DJ) in combination with on-site alcohol
consumption.
Bed and Breakfast-A single residential dwelling unit
or small hotel which provides temporary rental lodging
for members of the public and includes incidental food,
drink and services intended for the convenience of
guests.
Bedroom-Any habitable room other than a bathroom,
kitchen, dining room or living room.
Berm-A mound or embankment of earth, usually two to
six feet in height from the finished grade.
Bicycle Route-A thoroughfare suitable for the shared
use of bicycles and automobiles, moving at low speeds.
Block-The aggregate of private lots, passages, common
drives and lanes circumscribed by thoroughfares.
Block face-The aggregate of all building facades on one
side of a block. The block face provides the context for
establishing architectural harmony.
Building Function-The land uses accommodated by a
building and its lot.
Building Height-The vertical extent of a building
measured in stories, not including a raised basement or
a habitable attic. Height limits do not apply to masts,
belfries, clock towers, chimney flues, elevator
bulkheads and similar structures.
Building Type-(also known as Architectural Type) A
structure defined by the combination of configuration,
placement and function. The Building Types allowed
within the Specific Plan area are listed below and are
addressed in detail in Section IV-E.
• Commercial Block-The Commercial Block building
type is intended to accommodate mixed-use and/or
commercial development. Commercial Block
buildings may also be designed as a “liner” to conceal a
parking garage.
• Courtyard Building-The Courtyard Building
type is characterized by the configuration of a
group of business suites and/or residential
dwelling units that are arranged to share one or
more common courtyards. The shared
courtyard space or spaces are intended to be
semi-public space that is an extension of the
public realm.
• Bungalow Courtyard-The Bungalow
Courtyard building type typically consists of
four or more single family detached houses, or
multi-family duplexes, triplexes or quadplexes
arranged next to one another to form a shared
interior courtyard area that is partially or
wholly open to the public realm.
• Rowhouse-The Rowhouse building type
consists of a single building or multiple
buildings containing attached residential units
typically connected by common walls.
Typically, Rowhouse buildings are placed on
the lot in a manner that creates space for a rear
yard and space for individual garages.
Rowhouses are arranged side-by-side and give
the appearance of a continuous stretch of
residential facades along the street.
• Duplex, Triplex, Quadplex-Duplex, Triplex
or Quadplex buildings are configured into two,
three or four separate attached residential units
that are designed and architecturally presented
as a large single-family residence in their
typical neighborhood setting.
• Detached House-The Detached House
building type is a residential structure that is
not attached to any other residential structure
or unit and is intended for single-family
residential use only. Detached houses are not
intended for commercial occupancy (with the
exception of Bed and Breakfast
establishments).
Build-to line-A line that is located 10 feet behind the
property line in which the ground floor of the exterior
façade of a building is required to be placed.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-4
Building placement-The manner in which a building is
situated or placed on a property in relationship to the
required setbacks and build-to line for the zoning
district.
Bulkhead-A low partition located between the finished
grade and the window openings.
C
Can Sign-(also known as a cabinet sign) Any sign,
including logo boxes, that is shaped like a box to
enclose the source of internal illumination so that the
light shines through the translucent portions of the sign
panel.
Capital-The cap or crowning feature of a column
normally carved or heavily decorated.
Certificate of Occupancy-A document issued by the
City Building Official allowing the occupancy or use of
the building and certifying that the structure or use has
been constructed or will be used in compliance with all
of the applicable municipal codes and city ordinances.
Cigar Lounge/Cigar Bar (private membership
establishment only)-A private membership only
establishment where paying members smoke cigars in a
private lounge or bar.
Civic-A building or group of buildings owned or leased
by a public agency for the primary purpose of providing
a service to the general public. Uses may include public
parks, police and fire stations, senior citizen centers,
community centers, community assembly uses,
museums and other similar uses. New civic buildings or
changes to civic buildings will be reviewed through the
CIP process.
City Signature Event-A special event typically held in
Old Town where the city is the applicant or co-
applicant for the special event. Examples include the
Rod Run, Bluegrass Festival, and Hot Summer Nights.
Colonnade-A series of columns similar to an arcade but
spanned by straight lintels rather than arches and linked
together typically by an element of the building.
Commercial-The term collectively defining workplace,
office and retail functions or uses.
Commercial Block-(see Building Type).
Commercial Off-Premise Sign-Any sign structure
advertising an establishment, merchandise or
entertainment that is not sold, produced, manufactured,
or furnished at the location on which the sign is located.
Commercial off-premise signs are often referred to as
billboards.
Common area-An area focused around community
activity and acts as a social center for pedestrian
activity and social interaction.
Community Care Facility-Any facility, place or
building which is maintained and operated to provide
non-medical residential care, day treatment, adult day
care or foster family agency services for children,
adults, or children and adults, including, but not limited
to, the physically disabled, mentally impaired,
incompetent persons, and abused or neglected children,
and includes residential facilities, adult day care
facilities, day treatment facilities, foster family homes,
small family homes, social rehabilitation facilities,
community treatment facilities, and social day care
facilities.
Community Garden-A piece of land that is gardened,
cultivated, and/or maintained by a group of people
within a community. A community garden may be
counted toward meeting the private open space
requirements for residential projects in Old Town.
Complement-In new construction, it means to add to
the character of the area by attempting to incorporate
compatible architectural styles, building placement on
the build-to line, building height, scale, massing, colors
and materials.
Conditional Use-A use that is permitted in a particular
zoning district only upon showing that such use in a
specified location will comply with all the conditions
and standards of the General Plan and Old Town
Specific Plan for the location or operation of such use.
Connectivity-A concept which describes the extent to
which urban forms permit the comfortable, movement
of people and vehicles, and emphasizes equal
importance on vehicles and pedestrians in an urban
area. Connectivity permits the ease of multi-modal
movement and avoids severing neighborhoods; it also
encourages movement by foot, bike or transit rather
than by car.
Context-Surroundings, including a combination of land
uses, architectural, natural and civic elements that
define the specific character of a neighborhood,
commercial block or civic area.
Community Center-A facility that is typically operated
by the city which provides recreational, cultural or other
similar activities to the general public.
Curb-The edge of the vehicular pavement detailed as a
raised or rolled curb. The curb typically incorporates
into the drainage system.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-5
D
Day Care-Any child day care facility other than a
family day care home but including infant centers,
preschools and extended day care facilities.
Day Spa -(see “full service spa”).
Decibel (db)-A unit used to express the intensity of a
sound wave.
Dedication-The conveyance by a property owner or
developer of private land for public use, and the
acceptance of land for such use by the governmental
agency having jurisdiction over the public function for
which it will be used.
Density-The number of dwelling units within a measure
of land area, usually given as units per acre.
Demolish-To remove more than seventy-five percent of
the exterior walls of an existing building or structure, as
measured by the linear length of the walls.
Developable Areas-Those areas of a site that are not
designated as Open Space, or constrained by sensitive
habitat, right-of-way, flood control, slopes or site
constraints.
Driveway-A private vehicular lane or roadway
providing access to a lot, garage, alleyway or parking
area, dwelling or other structure.
Duplex, Triplex, or Quadplex-Structures are multiple
dwelling forms that are architecturally presented as
large single family houses in their typical neighborhood
setting.
Dwelling Unit-Any building or portion thereof that
contains living facilities including all of the following:
provisions for sleeping areas, a kitchen and bathroom.
E
Entrance-The principal point of access for pedestrians
into a building.
F
Façade-The exterior wall of a building.
Farmers Market-Retail market traditionally held
outdoors and open to the public for the sale of locally
grown produce and other food items such as but not
limited to nuts, eggs, and other processed food such as
baked goods or juices. Items at these markets are
produced by the seller or grown by local farmers.
Flats-Dwelling units that consist of a single floor level.
Form-based code-A type of zoning code that addresses
the relationship between building facades and the public
realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one
another, and the scale and types of streets and blocks.
Form-based codes foster predictable built results and a
high-quality public realm by using physical form (rather
than separation of uses) as the organizing principle for
the code.
Frontage Zone-The private property located between
the property line and the build-to line designed
primarily to accommodate comfortable pedestrian
movement.
Frontage Type-Building design features that interface
between the public and the private spaces along the
street. Design instructions and visual examples are
shown in the Urban Standards Section in the Design
Guidelines of this Specific Plan:
• Arcade
• Gallery
• Two story gallery
• Stoop
• Shopfront
• Porch
Full Service Hotel-A hotel which provides lodging
facilities and full service on-site restaurant facilities and
meeting space to accommodate at least 1,000 people,
such as a ballroom; along with additional ancillary
services within the facility, which may include health
club/spa services, concierge services, room service,
valet service, or similar hospitality related amenities, as
determined by the Director of Planning.
Full Service Spa-A full service spa offers a
combination of services that include but are not limited
to facials and skin care, body wraps, nail care (manicure
and pedicure), hair care, and massage therapy. A full
service spa must offer a combination of other spa
services in addition to massage therapy.
G
Gallery-A roofed structure, parallel to the façade, that
provides a covered extension to the public sidewalk.
General Retail (land use)-Stores and shops selling
many lines of merchandise. Examples of these stores
and merchandise may include:
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-6
Art galleries (retail)
Art Supplies, including framing services
Bicycles
Books, magazines and newspapers
Cameras and photographic supplies
Clothing, shoes and accessories
Drug stores and pharmacies
Dry goods
Fabrics and sewing supplies
Florist
Hobby store
Jewelry
Luggage and leather goods
Musical instruments
Small wares
Specialty shops
Sporting goods and equipment
Stationary
Toys and Games
Variety stores
Videos, DVDs, records, CDs
Green Building-An integrated “whole systems”
approach to the design, construction and operation of
buildings. Green building incorporates a number of
sustainable principles such as water and energy
conservation, the use of renewable energy, indoor air
quality measures that will result in health benefits and
the overall reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
H
Hookah Lounge/Hookah Bar (private membership
club only)-A private membership only establishment
where paying members smoke flavored tobacco from a
communal hookah pipe, water pipe, or nargile. These
establishments are also sometimes referred to as hookah
cafes, hookah salons, nargile bars, nargile cafes, nargile
lounges or nargile salons, shisha bars, shisha cafes,
shisha lounges or shisha salons.
Health and Fitness Establishment-Establishments
offering predominantly gymnasium style equipment
and/or participatory sports facilities, including a dance,
martial arts, yoga, jazzercise or aerobic studio, within
an enclosed building.
Historic Structure-A site, structure, building or feature
that is listed on a local, state or national historic register
or anything that is determined to be a Historic Resource
as defined by CEQA.
Home Occupation-A commercial activity conducted
solely by the owners and/or occupants of a particular
dwelling unit in a manner incidental to residential
occupancy.
Hotel-Hotel is defined as a residential building
containing six or more guest rooms or suites of rooms
which do not contain cooking facilities and which are
directly accessed through the lobby area.
Hotel, Full Service-(see “full service hotel”).
Hotel Overlay Zone- This zoning district is intended to
encourage the development of medium sized full
service hotel facilities and permits the development of
an eight-story full service hotel.
I
In-fill Development-A site seamlessly developed
within an existing urban fabric, balancing, completing
and/or enhancing the surrounding areas.
Infrastructure-Basic utilities, facilities and services
needed to sustain residential and commercial activities.
J
Jerkin- head gambrel roof-A shortened gable on a
hipped roof, not uncommon in "Eastlake" Victorians,
also known as a clipped gable roof.
K
(Reserved)
L
LEED (Leadership in Energy Efficient Design)-A
building certification program run under the auspices of
the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). LEED
concentrates its efforts on improving performance
across five key areas of environmental and human
health: energy efficiency, indoor environmental quality,
materials selection, sustainable site development, and
water savings.
Limited Accent Landscaping-Various landscape
treatments that are intended to highlight and accent the
building frontage along the street. These treatments may
include but are not limited to potted plants, hanging
plants, clay pots, small planter boxes, lattice treatments
with climbing vines, and other methods of landscaping
that soften the building façade along the street, but
provide adequate space for maximum pedestrian
clearance.
Live Entertainment-Typical examples include, but are
not limited to musicians or musical performances
(amplified or non-amplified), book/poetry readings,
karaoke, comedy performances, concerts, etc.
Live/Work Unit-An integrated residence and work
space; a building or unit that is structurally built to
accommodate both residential occupancy and non-
residential work activities.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-7
Liquor Store-A retail sales facility offering for sale an
assortment of distilled, fermented, brewed or similarly
prepared beverages that contain amounts of alcohol
sufficient to cause the sale of the beverage to be
regulated by the California State Department of
Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) and (1) where the
sale of such beverages is the prominent product sold in
such a facility, (whether such finding is determined by
total annual retail sales or square footage of the facility
dedicated to the storage and/or display area of such
merchandise), and (2) that the retail sales facility is not
the direct, corporately owned marketing and/or sales
facility of the producer of the alcoholic beverage and
where the alcoholic beverage is primarily intended to be
consumed off-site from the place of sale. A
convenience market selling distilled spirits that meet
criteria 1 and 2 shall also be considered a liquor store.
Logo-A trademark or symbol used to identify a
business.
Lot Line-The boundary that legally and geometrically
demarcates a lot.
M
Medical, Dental, Veterinarian (land uses)-
Establishment providing medical, psychiatric, surgical,
dental or other health related services. This includes
medical, dental, psychiatric or other therapeutic services
offered in individual suites. This excludes laboratories.
Massage Facilities-An establishment that offers
massage (as defined by Ordinance 08-12) without any
other spa services such as facials, body wraps, nail care,
or other services typically offered by a full service spa.
Mixed-Use-The development or project that includes
both commercial and residential uses.
Mixed-Use District-Areas of the Old Town Specific
Plan which allow both commercial and residential uses
within the same structure or building.
Mixed-Use Project-A development that combines both
commercial and residential uses on a single lot or
within a single structure.
MSHCP-The Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is a
comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional Habitat
Conservation Plan (HCP) focusing on conservation of
species and their associated Habitats in Western
Riverside County. This Plan is one of several large,
multi-jurisdictional habitat-planning efforts in Southern
California with the overall goal of maintaining
biological and ecological diversity within a rapidly
urbanizing region.
Multi-Family-The use of a site for two or more
dwellings within one or more buildings.
Multi-Use Trail-A path running independently of a
vehicular thoroughfare and non-traversable by vehicles;
often paved with a variety of materials (such as
decomposed granite, asphalt, etc) and often shared with
pedestrians, bicyclists and/or equestrians.
Museum-An institution for acquiring, collecting,
conserving, studying and displaying objects or artifacts
that have scientific, archeological, historical or artistic
value.
N
(Reserved)
O
Office-Consisting of offices of firms or organizations
that primarily provide executive, management,
administrative or financial services. It also refers to
establishments primarily engaged in providing
professional services to individuals or businesses but
excludes uses classified under the
Medical/Dental/Veterinarian classification.
P
Parking Structure-A building containing two or more
stories of parking.
Parks and Recreation-Open spaces intended for public
recreational use.
Paseo-A pathway or narrow alleyway that is often
between buildings and often partially covered, that
allows for safe connectivity, walkability and comfort
pedestrians in an urban area.
Pedestrian Zone-The sidewalk zone located between
the street furnishing zone and frontage zone, which is
intended to remain unobstructed and clear to
accommodate the safe and comfortable movement of
pedestrians.
Performing Arts-An artistic recital performed in front
of a live audience.
Permitted-Permitted by right, without the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
Personal Services-Commercial uses that provide goods
and services to meet the daily needs of the public.
Examples of such uses may include but are not limited
to:
Dry cleaners
Shoe repair
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-8
Drug Stores
Barber shops
Hair salons
Nail salons
Pet grooming (without boarding)
Tailors
Podium Parking-At grade parking that is fully
enclosed with a common entrance that has commercial
space or dwelling units over the parking level of a
building.
Private open space-A fenced or unfenced open outdoor
area that is reserved for the exclusive use by the
occupants of a specified dwelling.
Public Realm-A publicly accessible space which
typically includes the streets, sidewalks, park areas and
other public or quasi-public spaces that are adjacent to
the street or sidewalk.
R
Residential/Attached-Residential structures that have
an interior wall or roof in common with another
structure.
Residential/Detached-Residential structures that do not
have an interior wall or roof in common with another
structure.
Residential/Ground Floor-Residential units that are
confined to the first floor of a structure.
Residential/Live/Work-A residential unit in which the
occupant both formally resides and conducts the
operations of a home based business.
Restaurant-An establishment where food and drink is
prepared, served, and consumed primarily within the
principle building.
Retail-A premises selling goods or merchandise
directly to the ultimate consumer.
Rowhouse-Two or more attached one-story, two-story,
or three story dwellings, or townhome style units, with
zero side-yard setbacks arrayed side-by-side along the
primary frontage abutting the build-to line.
S
Sidewalk Café/Outdoor Eating Area-Any group of
tables and chairs, and related amenities situated on the
ground level within the Frontage Zone to provide for
outdoor dining in connection with the consumption of
food and beverage sold to the public from an adjoining
indoor restaurant or eating establishment.
Sidewalk Zones-Specific zones assigned to designated
areas of the sidewalk within both the public right of
way and private property located between the property
line and the build-to line. The specific zones call out the
minimum width of the zone and the placement of
various street furnishings such as benches, newspaper
racks, light poles, street trees, parking meters and
sidewalk cafes.
Street Furnishing Zone-The sidewalk zone is located
between the curb zone and the pedestrian zone and is
intended to provide a linear and uniform space for items
such as street fixtures, street trees, streetlights, parking
meters, and street signs.
Street Trees-Street adjacent trees located at a distance
of 2.5 feet from the back of curb and within a 5’ x 5’
foot tree grate located within the “street furnishing”
zone.
Streetscape-The urban element that establishes the
major part of the public realm. The streetscape is
comprised of thoroughfares such as streets, alleys,
sidewalks, visible building frontages, and amenities
such as, but not limited to street trees, benches and
other street furniture, and streetlights.
Subterranean parking-Parking that is contained
completely within an underground structure.
Sustainability-The ability to meet the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future
generations to also meet their own needs.
T
Tandem Parking-An off-street parking arrangement
where one vehicle is parked behind the other.
Tattoo Studio-An establishment where people receive
permanent tattoos and/or body piercings. Tattoos are
defined as a permanent mark or design made on the skin
by the insertion of ink or other pigments below the skin
using a sharp instrument. Tattoo studios are also known
as tattoo parlors or tattoo shops.
Trade/Educational Institution-Facilities that provide
vocational and/or educational services for the purposes
of preparing students for jobs in a trade or profession.
U
Utilitarian-Utility related items and their structural
components that relate to the maintenance and basic
functioning components of each land use or project.
These items may include but are not limited to trash and
recycling areas or enclosures, above ground equipment
and components of wet and dry utilities.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-9
W
Walkabilty-A measure of how friendly an area is to
movement and mobility for pedestrians.
Y
Yard-An open space area on a lot that is unoccupied by
building area and/or hardscape.
Z
Zaguan-A pedestrian passage between courtyards often
times fully or partially covered; similar to a paseo.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-10
(This page is left blank intentionally).
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-11
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Arctostaphylos Emerald Carpet 1 5 Groundcover 0.2 (low)
Baccharis “Centennial” Bentennial baccharis 2 5 Groundcover 0.2 (low)
Myoporum Parvifolium Myoporum 0.5 8 Groundcover 0.2 (low)
Teucrium Chamaedrys Germander 1 2 Groundcover 0.2 (low)
B. OLD TOWN PLANT LIST
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-12
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc /Water Usage
Fragaria Chiloensis
Wild Strawberry
0.5
1
Groundcover
0.5 (med.)
Pelargonium Peltatum Ivy Geranium 2 4 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Ceratostigma
Pumbarginoides
Dwarf Plumbago 1 4 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Geranium Incanum Cranesbill 0.5 2 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-13
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Hypericum Calycinum Aaron’s Beard 1 3 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Juniperus Conferta Shore Juniper 1 6 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Lirope Spicata Creeping Lily Turf 1 3 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Lotus Corniculatus Birdsfoot Trefoil 1 3 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-14
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Nam Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Trachelosperum
asiaticum
Asian Jasmine Star 1 3 Groundcover 0.5 (med.)
Cerastium Tomentosum Snow in Summer 0.5 3 Groundcover 0.5 (med).
Baileya Multiradiata Desert Marigold 1 1.5 Perennial 0.2 (low)
Coreopsis Auriculata
'Nana'
Dwarf Coreopsis 0.5 2 Perennial 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-15
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Coreopsis Lanceolata Coreopsis 1.5 1 Perennial 0.2 (low)
Epilobium Zauschneria California Fuschia 3 3 Perennial 0.2 (low)
Kniphofia Uvaria Red Hot Poker 2 3 Perennial 0.2 (low)
Narcissus Daffodil 2 3 Perennial 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-16
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Agapanthus Africanus Lily-of-the-Nile 1.5 1.5 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
Anigozanthos Flavidus Kangaroo Paw 2 2 Perennial
0.5 (med.)
Armeria Maritime Sea Pink 0.5 1 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
Chrysanthemum
Superbum
Shasta Daisy 2 2 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-17
VI. APPENDICES
Photo
Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Helictotrichon
Sempervirens
Blue Oat Grass 2 2 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
Gaura Lindhelmer Gaura 3 3 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
Hermerocallis Day Lily 1 2 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
Imperata Cylindrica
‘Rubra’
Japanese blood grass 1 2 Perennial 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-18
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Muhlenburia Rigens
Deer Grass 3 3 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Convolvulus Cneorum Bush Morning Glory 3 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Senna Artemisioides
Feathery Cassia 5 5 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Dasylirion Desert Spoon 3 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-19
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Echium Fastuosum
Pride of Madeira 5 5 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Euphorbia Rigida Euphorbia (Rigida) 2 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Euryops Pectinatus Europys/Shrub Daisy 5 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Grevillea Grevillea 4 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Hesperaloe Parviflora Red/Yellow Yucca 3 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-20
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Lantana Carnara Lantana 3 5 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Lavendula Spp. Lavender 3 3 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Lavatera Bicolor Tree Mallow 6 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Leptospermum
Scoparium
New Zealand tea tree 6 6 Shrub 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-21
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Leucophyllum
Frutescens
Texas Ranger 6 6 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Rosmarinus Officinalis Rosemary 5 5
Shrub 0.2 (low)
Ruellia Brittoniana Mexican Reullia 3 2 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Salvia Chamaedryoides Blue Sage 1 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-22
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Salvia Greggii Autumn Sage 4 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Salvia Leucantha Mexican Sage Bush 4 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Santolina Spp. Lavender Cotton 2 2 Shrub 0.2 (low)
Sollya Heterophylla Australian Bluebell
Creeper
2 4 Shrub 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-23
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Abelia ‘Edward
Goucher’
Pink Abelia 4 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Abelia X Grandiflora Glossy Abelia 5 5 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Abelia 'Sherwoodii' Sherwood Dwarf Abelia 3 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Aspidistra Elatior Cast Iron Plant 2 2 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-24
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Buxus Microphylla
Japonica
Japanese Boxwood 4 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Chamelaucium
Uncinatum
Geraldton Wax Flower 6 6 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Clivia Miniata Kafir Lily 2 2 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Euryops Pectinatus
Viridis
Green Euryops 5 5 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-25
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Felicia Amelloides Blue Marguerite 1.5 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Felicia Fruticosa Shrub Aster 2 3 Shrub 0.5 (med)
Gardenia Veitchii Gardenia 3 3 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Hypericum 'Hidcote' St. John’s Wort 4 4 Shrub 0.5 (med)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-26
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Mahonia Aquifolium Oregon Grape 6 6 Shrub 0.5 (med)
Myrtus Communis True Myrtle 5 4 Shrub 0.5 (med)
Nandina Domestica
‘Purpurea’
Heavenly Bamboo 1.5 1 Shrub 0.5 (med)
Perovskia Atriplicifolia Russian Sage 3 3 Shrub 0.5 (med)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-27
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Phormium Hybrids Flax 4 3 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Phormium Tenax New Zealand Flax 5 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Pittosporum Tobria
‘Wheelers Dwarf’
Dwarf Pittosporum 2 2 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Punica Granatum ‘Nana’ Dwarf Pomegranate 3 3 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-28
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Rhaphiolepis Spp. Indian Hawthorne 4 4 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Rosa ‘Cecile Brunner” Cecile Brunner Rose 6 6 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Rosa Hybrids Bush Rose varies varies Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Spiraea Japonica Spiraea 4 4 Shrub 0.5 (med)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-29
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Thymus Vulgaris Common Thyme 1 2 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Trachelospermum
Jasminoldes
Star Jasmine 1.5 5 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Veronica Spp. Veronica 1.5 1.5 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
Carex Testacea
Brown Sedge 2 6 Shrub 0.5 (med)
Carex Stricta
Tussock Sedge 2 2 Shrub 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-30
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Lagerstroemia Indica Crape Myrtle 20 15 Tree 0.2 (low)
Cercidium Praecox Sonoran Palo Verde 25 25 Tree 0.2 (low)
Chitalpa Tashkentensis Chitalpa 25 25 Tree 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-31
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Rhus Lancea African Sumac 25 25
Tree 0.2 (low)
Sophora Secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel 25 25 Tree 0.2 (low)
Alnus Cordata Italian Alder 35 20 Tree 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-32
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Arbutus Unedo Strawberry Tree 20 20 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Bauhinia Variegata Purple Orchid Tree 30 30 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Cercis Canadensis Eastern Rosebud 30 30 Tree 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-33
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Elaeagnus Angustifolia Russian Olive 20 20 Tree 0.2 (low)
Koelreuteria Bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree 30 30 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Ligustrum Lucidum Glossy Privet 35 30
Tree 0.5 (med)
Magnolia Soulangiana Saucer Magnolia 20 20 Tree 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-34
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Olea Europaea Olive 25 25 Tree 0.2 (low)
Prunus Spp.
(Ornamental)
Cherry/Plum
Flowering
Cherry/Flowering Plum
25 25 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Prunus Caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 35 20 Tree 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-35
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Tipuana Tipu Tipu Tree 30 30 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Vitex Agnus Castus Chaste Tree 20 20 Tree 0.5 (med)
Pyrus Calleryana
Cultivars
Callery Pear/Bradford Pear 40 20 Tree 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-36
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Tristaniopsis Laurina Little Leaf Myrtle 15 8 Tree 0.5 (med.)
Clematis Iasiantha Pipestem Clemantis 1 10 Vine 0.2 (low)
Lonicera Japonica Japanese Honeysuckle 1 10 Vine 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-37
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Lonicera Japonica
“Halliana”
Hali’s Honeysuckle 1 10 Vine 0.2 (low)
Macfadyena Unguis-cati Cat’s Claw 1 10 Vine 0.2 (low)
Vitis Californica California Wild Grape 1 10 Vine 0.2 (low)
Ficus Pumila Creeping Fig 6 6 Vine 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-38
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Clematis Armandii Evergreen Clematis 15 5 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Clytostoma
Callistegioides
Violet Trumpet Vine 15 5 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Distictus Buccinatoria Blood Red Trumpet Vine 20 5 Vine 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-39
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Distictis “Rivers” Royal Trumpet Vine 20 5 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Lonicera Sempervirens Trumpet Honeysuckle 20 5 Vine 0.5(med.)
Nyctaginaceae Bougainvillea 6 6 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Parthenocissus
Tricuspidata
Boston Ivy 15 15 Vine 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-40
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Rosa Banksiae Lady Banks Rose 15 15 Vine 0.5 (med)
Rosa Hybrids (climbing) Climbing Rose 10 15 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Solandra Maxima Cup of Gold Vine 10 10 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Solanum Jasminoides Potato Vine 10 10 Vine 0.5 (med.)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-41
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Wisteria Spp. Wisteria 20 20 Vine 0.5 (med.)
Clematis Hybrids Deciduous Clematis 15 5 Vine 0.8 (high)
Aloe Nobilis
Gold Tooth Aloe 1 1 Succulent 0.2 (low)
Dudleya Hassei
Hasse’s Dudleya 1 1 Succulent 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-42
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Opuntia Basilaris
Beavertail Prickly Pear 2 2 Succulent 0.1
(very low)
Opuntia Violacea Santa-
rita
Blue Clad Cactus 2 2 Succulent 0.1
(very low)
Dudleya Pulverulenta
Chalk Dudleya 2 1 Succulent 0.1
(very low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-43
VI. APPENDICES
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Kalanchoe Beharensis
Felt Plant 4 4 Succulent 0.5 (med)
Delosperma Cooperii
Ice Plant 1 N/A Succulent 0.2 (low)
Lampranthus productus
Lampranthus 1 2 Succulent 0.2 (low)
Sedum Seiboldii
October Daphne 0.5 1 Succulent 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula – Old Town Specific Plan VI-44
VI. APPENDICES
Source: Plant list derived from City of Temecula Development Code Chapter 17.32.
Photo Botanical Name Common Name Height (feet) Spread (feet) Plant Type Kc/Water Usage
Lampranthus Deltoides
Oscularia 1 1 Succulent 0.2 (low)
Sedum Spathulifolium
Purple Stonecrop 1 1 Succulent 0.2 (low)
Delosperma Alba
White Trailing Ice Plant 1 2 Succulent 0.2 (low)
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-45
C. DESIGN GUIDELINES CASE STUDIES
The case studies contained in this section are illustrative
examples that are intended to guide development under
various scenarios that may occur within the Old Town
Specific Plan area. The case studies are conceptual in
nature and are not intended to regulate the way in which
any particular piece of property should be developed,
nor are they intended to be viewed as urban standards.
These case studies should not be construed in any way
as concrete requirements.
The following areas are explored in greater detail below
and a case study is provided for each on the following
pages:
• Forecourt Frontage Type
• Restoring Street Frontages: Adding to Existing
Buildings
• Infill Building Example
• Murrieta Creek Walk
• Paseos
• Attached Residential and Mixed-Use Buildings
• Mid-Block Parking Behind Buildings
• Moreno Road Neighborhood Market
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-46
1. Case Study#1: Forecourt Frontage Type
Example of an existing Mission style forecourt in Santa
Barbara, currently used as a restaurant:
Figure VI-83a, b (above): Views of the forecourt
from the street.
Figure VI-84 a: Basic building form defining the forecourt. Figure VI-84 b: Addition of gallery and arcade
frontages inside the forecourt.
Figure VI-84 c: Addition of a balcony to the arcade, a low
wall at the sidewalk enclosing the forecourt, and steel posts
and chain separating the seating on the sidewalk from the
pedestrians.
Figure VI-84 d: The Mission architectural style and
detailing that completes the forecourt.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-47
2. Case Study #2: Restoring Street Frontages:
Adding to Existing Buildings
Example of a building in Old Town set back from the
frontage property line. Restoring the street frontage
while keeping the existing building could be done
several ways; one example is shown by adding onto the
building and creating a forecourt.
Figure VI-85 a: Existing conditions showing building
with parking lot in front.
Figure VI-85 b: Potential additions to the building to
bring facades to the street and create a forecourt.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-48
3. Case Study #3: Infill Building Example
Figure VI-86 a (right): Existing vacant lot on Third Street in Old
Town.
Figure VI-86 b (right): Example in-fill buildings on same site,
showing three and four story buildings. Facades are on the build-to
line, and galleries extend up to the property line. Development would
occur on both sides of the street. The best way to draw pedestrians up
toward Mercedes Street is with inviting, interesting pedestrian streets.
The development could be built as one or several projects. Parking is
in the rear, accessible by pedestrians via one or more paseos or
passages from the street.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-49
4. Case Study #4: Murrieta Creek Walk
Old Town has historically turned its back to Murrieta
Creek, using land along the creek for backyards, storage
and parking. The proposed flood control improvements
provide the opportunity for Old Town to create a
positive relationship with the creek. The concept of the
Murrieta Creek Walk includes the creation of a
pedestrian walkway along both sides of the water
course with buildings fronting portions of the creek.
Figure VI-87 a (right): Plan view of the Murrieta Creek Walk
concept.
Figure VI-87 b (right): Perspective view of the Murrieta Creek
Walk concept, with buildings fronting the creek.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-50
5. Case Study #5: Paseos
Paseos are uncovered pedestrian walkways linking the
street sidewalk to parking behind the building. The
simplest type of paseo is a gap between two buildings
with a barrier-free walking path extending to the rear of
the building. Planters with landscaping and trees are
common. To aid with way finding, paseos are often
named and marked with signage.
In Old Town, the primary pedestrian and shopping
experience is intended to be oriented toward the public
street. Paseos may provide secondary entrances and
display windows for shops, but shall not replace or
diminish the primary role of streets. While courtyards
are permitted in the middle of blocks, the intent is to
avoid turning the middle of the block into a mall with
shopfronts and restaurants. The images below show
examples of paseos with secondary entrances and
display windows.
Figure VI-88 a, b: Paseos connecting the street sidewalk with parking in the rear. Note the presence of
landscaping and trees, and the absence of entrances and display windows. Photo at left has a round sign
identifying the paseo.
Figure VI-89 a, b, c: Narrow paseos with secondary entrances and display windows. In narrow paseos,
landscaping is often placed in freestanding planters. Note the presence of awnings, balconies and lighting.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-51
Case Study #5: Paseos (continued)
Another type of paseo provides access from the
sidewalk to a commercial or retail building in the
middle of the block (figure VI-90 a,b). This type of
paseo may be “T” or “L” shaped, providing a lateral
connection to mid-block parking or out to an adjacent
street. Note the potted landscaping, awnings, display
windows and lighting.
The last type of paseo is the most highly developed and
functions as a pedestrian street internal to the block.
With widths up to 20 feet, the paseo can accommodate
trees and extensive landscaping, seating areas with
umbrellas, and full size awnings over shopfronts.
Figure VI-90 a, b: Paseos providing access from the sidewalk to a commercial or retail building in the middle of the
block.
Figure VI-91 a, b: Wider paseos become pedestrian streets.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-52
6. Case Study #6. Examples of Attached Residential
and Mixed-Use Buildings
Figure VI-92 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
Figure VI-93 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-53
6. Case Study #6. Examples of Attached Residential
and Mixed-Use Buildings (continued)
Figure VI-94 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
Figure VI-95 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-54
Case Study #6. Examples of Attached Residential
and Mixed-Use Buildings (continued)
Figure VI-97 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
Figure VI-96 a, b: Contemporary example of retail on the ground floor, residential above.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-55
7. Case Study #7: Existing Example of
Successful Mid-Block Parking Behind
Buildings.
Placing building facades close to the street is a key to
creating interesting and lively pedestrian streets. In Old
Town, the build-to line is 10 feet back from the
property line. Locating facades on this line was the
traditional practice in Old Town beginning in the
1880’s. The northwest corner of Main and Front Streets
illustrates a successful example of this practice (Figures
IV-100 and IV-102). Placing the buildings close to the
street also provides room in the back for parking. This
assemblage of building represents a well designed and
successful example of street-friendly buildings with
mid-block parking behind. While the number of spaces
in the parking lot does not satisfy the total parking
demand created by the buildings, it provides important
convenience parking.
Figure VI-99 (above): Aerial view of the buildings
placed close to the street with parking behind.
Figure VI-98 (left):
Plan view of the
northwest corner of
Main and Front
Streets.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-56
8. Case Study # 8: Moreno Road Neighborhood
Market
The north end of Old Town could be redeveloped into
a mixed-use neighborhood with greater density. A
traffic circle is shown at the intersection of Front and
Mercedes Streets, with Moreno Road realigned to
solve traffic issues. The edge of Front Street facing the
creek could be lined with retail and commercial with
residential above.
Figure VI-100: Plan view of possible realignment of
Moreno Road showing possible building footprints.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-57
Case Study # 8 (Cont).
Figure VI-101: Perspective view of Moreno
Road area showing possible redevelopment.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-58
D. OLD TOWN PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
Not incorporated herein. This document is contained
under a separate cover as retained by the City of
Temecula Planning Department.
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-59
E. EXAMPLES OF COMPACT DOUBLE
DETECTOR CHECKS
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-60
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-61
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-62
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-63
F. SHERWIN WILLIAMS PRESERVATION
PALETTE
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-64
VI. APPENDICES
City of Temecula - Old Town Specific Plan VI-65
(This page is left blank intentionally).
VI. APPENDICES