Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout033005 PC Agenda Gwyn Flores .. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE March 30, 2005 - 6:00 P.M. ******** Next in Order: Resolution No. 2005-015 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Commissioner Olhasso Roll Call: Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Olhasso, Telesio and Mathewson PUBLIC COMMENTS . A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: . 1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 30, 2005 R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2005\03-30-05.doc 2 Minutes . RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of January 19, 2005 2.2 Approve the Minutes of February 2, 2005 2.3 Approve the Minutes of February 16, 2005 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 3 Plannina Application No. PA04-0476 a Development Plan. submitted by Matthew Faaan. to construct two office/retail buildinas totalina 18.237 sauare feet on 2.5 acres (Buildina A is . 6.329 sauare feet. Buildina B is 11.908 sauare feet). located on the south side of Pauba Road. an estimated 312 feet west of the intersection of Marqarita and Pauba Road. Christine Damko. Associate Planner. 4 Plannina Application No. PA04-0728. a Development Plan. submitted by Scott Barone of Edqe Development, to construct 17 office buildinqs totalinq 54,093 square feet on a 4.71 acre vacant site in the Liaht Industrial zone, located on the west side of Business Park Drive between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road, Matthew Peters, Associate Planner. 5 Plannina Application Nos. PA04-0605 and PA04-0394, a Conditional Use Permit (PA04- 0605) and Development Plan (PA04-0394). submitted by Malkoff & Associates, to construct. establish and operate a 29,751 sauare foot church facility includina a sanctuary. preschool facility. parish hall, meetina rooms and offices on 3.75 acres, located at 44651 Avenida de Missiones, aenerally located on the west side of Avenida de Missiones approximately 300 feet south of Hiahway 79 South, Stuart Fisk. Associate Planner. 6 Planninq Application No. PA04-0525, a Development Plan, submitted by Riccardo Ferauson of McArdle Associates Architects, to construct two sinqle-story retail buildinas totalina 26.470 sauare feet within the Creekside Centre Shoppinq Plaza on a 6.3 acre site, located on the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane, Matthew Harris, Associate Planner. . R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2005\03-30-05.doc 2 . . . 7 PlanninQ Application No. PA04-0537. a Development Plan. submitted bv Dave Wakefield of Davcon Development. to construct seven commercial/retail/office buildinQs totalinQ 67.570 square feet on 6.88 acres within the approved Temecula Creek VillaQe Planned Development Overlav District (PDO-4), located at the southeast corner of State HiQhwav 79 South and Jedediah Smith Road. Emerv Papp. Senior Planner. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, April 6, 2005, 6:30 PM, Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2005\03-30-05.doc 3 . ITEM #2 . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 19, 2005 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, January 19, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso**, and Chairman Telesio. Absent: None. . "Commissioner Olhasso arrived at 6:23 P.M. . PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of January 19, 2005. It was noted by Chairman Telesio that Item No.4 will be considered after Item No. 9. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of October 6, 2004; Commissioner Mathewson abstained with regard to thi~ item. R:IMinutesPCI011905 1 2.2 Approve the Minutes of October 20, 2004; . 2.3 Approve the Minutes of November 3, 2004; Commissioner Guerriero abstained with regard to this item. 2.4 Approve the Minutes of November 17, 2004. 3 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for December, 2004. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-3. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who abstained with regard to Item 2.3; Commissioner Mathewson abstained with regard to Item No. 2.1; and Commissioner Olhasso was absent (arrived at 6:23 P.M.). COMMISSION BUSINESS Election of new Chairperson and Vice Chairperson MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to appoint Commissioner Mathewson as the . Commission Chairman for 2005. The motion was seconded by Chairman Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Olhasso who was absent. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to appoint Commissioner Guerriero as the Commission Vice Chairman for 2005. The motion was seconded by Chairman Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Olhasso who was absent. Expressing his appreciation to outgoing Chairman Telesio for his leadership, newly appointed Chairman Mathewson thanked the Commission for being given the opportunity to serve as the Commission Chairman for 2005. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Continued from December 15, 2004 4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0550. a Maior Modification to a Development Plan. submitted bv Brian Price. Breckenridqe Group. to allow exterior elevation chanqes and the conversion of a Coco's Restaurant to a Rubv's Diner. located at 26495 Ynez Road. west of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive in the Palm Plaza Shoppinq Center, Matt Peters. Associate Planner. This Item will be considered after Agenda Item No.9; seepage 13. . R:\MinutesPC\01190S 2 . . . Continued from January 5, 2005 5 Planninq Application Nos. PA04-0134 and PA04-136. a Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map No. 32113. submitted bv Matthew Faqan Consultants. to construct two. multi- tenant industrial buildinqs on 8.5 acres. Buildinq A is 73.148 square feet and includes 27 industrial condominium units ranqinq in size from 2,066 to 4,143 square feet and Buildinq B is 55,785 square feet and includes 17 industrial condominium units ranqinq in size from 2,066 to 4.143 square feet. located on the north side of Reminqton Avenue and south side of Dendv Road, between Diaz Road and Winchester Road, Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planner By way of overheads, Associate Planner Kitzerow reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material) and added the following condition to the resolution for the Development Plan: . That the revised and initial study include additional mitigation measure, requiring low volatile organic compound architectural coatings for the buildings that were added to the initial study. In response to Chairman Mathewson, Ms. Kitzerow advised that staff would be of the opinion that an additional Health Risk Assessment would not be necessary with regard to carcinogenic affects/diesel exhaust. Providing additional clarification, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that this matter will further be addressed in the General Plan which will include an environmental review and should address the concerns of the Air Quality Management District (AQMD). Mr. Mathewson questioned whether the new General Plan Element will satisfactorily address this issue. Noting that because a majority of the diesel emissions which penetrate this area are not directly from this area, Commissioner Chiniaeff concurred with staff's opinion that, at this time, an additional Health Risk Assessment would not be necessary. In light of the concern raised, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that in an effort to be proactive to AQMD's concerns, the City has preliminarily discussed the City adoption thresholds or some criteria within its local guidelines and advised that follow up with AQMD will occur in an effort to further understand its position. Having worked with Associate Planner Kitzerow, Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing CBC Remington, relayed concurrence of the conditions of approval and requested the Commission's support. With regard to the AQMD matter, Mr. Fagan noted that because the site of discussion has been graded, nominal construction emissions will result and could be mitigated and that as far as operational emissions, diesel-type vehicles will not visit this site. At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the request with the addition of a condition, as noted above, along with the adoption of the resolutions for the Tentative Tract Map and the Development Plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Olhasso who was absent. R:IMinulesPCI011905 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0136 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32113 TO CREATE 44 INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN TWO BUILDINGS RANGING IN SIZE FROM 2,066 SQUARE FEET TO 4,143 SQUARE FEET ON 8.5 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF REMINGTON AVENUE AND SOUTH OF DENDY ROAD, BETWEEN DIAZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-370-037 . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0134 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 128,933 SQUARE FEET ON 8.5 ACRES IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE, LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF REMINGTON AVENUE AND SOUTH SIDE OF DENDY ROAD, BETWEEN DlAZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOW AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-370-037 6 PlanninG Application Nos. PA04-0359 and PA04-0365. Tentative Tract Map No. 32104 and a Home Product Review. submitted by Greystone Homes, to subdivide 5.2 acres into 53 sinGle family residential lots, 18 open space lots. one street lot. and consider the architectural desiGn and placement of the proposed homes within the tract. located on the northwest corner of Lake House Road and Sarasota Lane within the Harveston Specific Plan area, Matthew Harris. Associate Planner . Associate Planner Harris highlighted the staff report (of record), advising that the Public Works Department has requested that Condition No. 19 be modified as follows: Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Logan Court on the Final Map with the exception of !Y!Q openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. . By way of the enhanced elevations' exhibit, Mr. Harris, for Commissioner Chiniaeff, confirmed that the longer side elevations are being enhanced. For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Harris clarified that all previously requested conditions have been incorporated. In response to Chairman Mathewson, Mr. Harris noted that this project will not exceed the 20% threshold, as per the Specific Plan, with regard architectural styles. Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Lennar - Greystone Homes, expressed the applicant's concurrence with staff's findings and conditions of approval, including the amended conditions. . R:\MinutesPC\011905 4 . . . Ms. Mary Anne Paradise, Temecula, representing Lennar - Greystone Homes, advised that there will be 60 homes in the Ashville I project. Elaborating on the reasons of why he and his family chose to move to the Harveston Community, Mr. Anthony Reiter, Temecula, a licensed architect, expressed concern with regard to the height (three-story) and density of the proposed project. For Mr. Reiter, Chairman Mathewson clarified that the proposed density will be consistent with the Specific Plan. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's inquiry, Ms. Paradise noted that the Lennar Sales Offices has fully disclosed and apprised potential buyers that the Harveston Specific Plan does include many different densities and architectural styles. Mr. Chiniaeff noted that residents should be required to sign a notice making them fully aware of the specifics of the Specific Plan. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with the three-story structures. Considering the Commission had previously approved three-story structures in the first phase of this project, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that it would be within the applicant's right to request three-story structures for the proposed phase. Commissioner Telesio suggested that the disclosure responsibility of the developer and the responsibility of the buyer be addressed and clarified. At this time, the public hearing was reopened. It was noted, by Chairman Mathewson, that of the proposed 53 structures, approximately 30 of them will be three-story structures and advised that the three-story structures will require an additional height of approximately 12'. Further clarifying the information that is disclosed to the potential buyers, Ms. Paradise advised that the Welcome Home Center does display a topographical map which reflects the Specific Plan. Addressing the disclosure information given to potential buyers, Mr. Mike Bender, Temecula, commented on a community pamphlet and a general rendering of Harveston Community. As far as the Welcome Home Center, Mr. Bender noted that he would not view the individuals working at the Center as helpful in providing pertinent information. Further elaborating on information provided to potential buyers, Mr. Greg Bucella, representing the applicant as the architect, commented on elevation/product information that was available in the Welcome Home Center, noting that concept elevations included three-story structures. At this time, Chairman Mathewson closed the public hearing. Considering what the Commission conceptually approved at the Specific Plan level, Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed his support of the request. R:IMinutesPCI011905 5 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the staff recommendation with the . recommended conditions of approval as well as amended by Condition No. 19 (Public Works Department; see page 4) and to adopt the associated resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0359 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TIM 32105) AND PA04-0365 (HOME PRODUCT REVIEW ASHVILLE II) TO SUBDIVIDE 5.23 ACRES INTO 53 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 18 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND A ONE PRIVATE STREET LOT AND APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF 53 HOMES WITHIN A PORTION OF PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN New Items 7 Planninq Application No. PA04-0358, Tentative Tract Map No. 32319. submitted bv Standard Pacific Homes. to subdivide 3.92 acres into 6 sinqle-familv residential lots with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. located in Planninq Area 16 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. southeast 01 Woll Vallev Road and Pechanqa Parkwav. west of the Redhawk Development. Chervl Kitzerow. Associate Planner . Associate Planner Kitzerow referenced the staff report (as per written material), advising that the downward trending slopes are part of the subject property; that the developer will plant the sloped area; that the homeowner will maintain the area; and noting that the Public Works Department has requested that Condition No. 73 (Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees) be deleted. Advising that he was in attendance to address any questions, Mr. Adam Smith, representing the applicant, thanked Associate Planner Kitzerow lor her presentation as well as other Planning Department staff members for their efforts. At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the staff recommendation, deleting Condition No. 73 (Public Works Department, as noted above) and to adopt the associated resolution. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Chiniaeff and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . R:IMinutesPCI011905 6 . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0358 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32319 SUBDIVIDING 3.92 ACRES INTO SIX-SINGLE FAMILY LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 16 OF THE WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF WOLF VALLEY ROAD AND PECHANGA PARKWAY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 962-010-001 8 Planninq Application No. PA04-0350. Tentative Tract Map No. 32436. submitted bv Lennar Communities Inc. to subdivide 10.8 acres into 76 sinqle-familv residential lots and 10 open space lots. located east of Ynez Road and north of Date Street within the Harveston Specific Plan area. Matthew Harris. Associate Planner Associate Planner Harris highlighted the staff report (as per agenda material), referencing letters (copies of which were distributed to the Commission) received from property owners in Murrieta as well as from the City of Murrieta. . In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Harris confirmed that the rear property line of the property of discussion will be located in the City; that this area will sit higher than the up sloped property abutting the City property line; and that the up sloped area is located in the City of Murrieta. Mr. Harris noted that a landscape buffer will be provided along the City's rear property line. With regard to the City of Murrieta retaining a one-foot non-access strip across North End Road, Mr. Harris and Deputy Director of Public Works Parks advised that Murrieta City Council approval would be necessary for the proposed connection; that the previous Tract had the imposition of a condition, requiring Murrieta City Council approval prior to final recordation; that this particular Tract does not have such a condition because this Tract does not have access requirements to connect to North End Road; that the two required points of access will be Vnez Road and to the circulation roads within the other tract; and that the Commission may opt to add a similar condition to this particular Tract, requiring Murrieta City Council approval prior to final recordation. Commissioner Chiniaeff was of the opinion that the same condition as was imposed on the previous Tract with regard to the City of Murrieta granting approval of the one-foot non-access strip should be imposed on this particular Tract. For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Harris advised that, for the previous tract, in an effort to ensure proper emergency response, the Fire Department required two access points; that the applicant has been discussing the matter with the City of Murrieta and one option would be to install a crash gate at the terminus of North End Road, serving as an emergency access but no general public access; and that this matter has not been unresolved with the City of Murrieta. Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that the proposed Tract not be approved until the previous Tentative Tract Map has been approved. . Planning Director Ubnoske clarified that staff is in support of approving the Tentative Tract Map because the City of Murrieta has approved the access through this Tentative Tract Map as being consistent with the Specific Plan. R:IMinutesPCI011905 7 Stating that the jurisdiction for the proposed action is in the City of Temecula and understanding . the Commission's concern, Assistant City Attorney Curley was of the opinion that the Commission would be justified to proceed with action at this meeting, applying the City of Temecula standards to a City of Temecula application. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Curley noted that the imposition of a condition to require a secondary access point prior to recordation would be viewed as a health and safety matter and, therefore, would be a defensible condition. Deputy Public Works Director Parks advised that within the Specific Plan and the Development Plan, there was an agreement between the applicant (Lennar) and the City of Murrieta to mitigate traffic issues; that Lennar has paid the City of Murrieta in excess oi $600,000 to address these issues; and that the City of Murrieta agreed to the Specific Plan which showed the connection and as well agreed to the proposed mitigations and accepted payment for it. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Advising that this will be the applicant's final single-family project, Mr. Kevin Lynch, representing Lennar Communities, commented on efforts undertaken to resolve this particular issue and voiced no objection to the imposition of a condition to require a secondary point prior to Map recordation. There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to adopt the Tentative Tract Map resolution and to proceed with the recommended action of approval with the addition of a condition, requiring no Tentative Tract Map recordation prior to the applicant obtaining approval from the City of . Murrieta with regard to the secondary access. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0350, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 32436 SUBDIVIDING PLANNING AREA 11 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN INTO 76 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND 10 OPEN SPACE LOTS FOR LENNAR COMMUNITIES ON 10.8 VACANT ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF YNEZ ROAD AND NORTH OF DATE STREET KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-100-007 AND -008 9 Planninq Application No. PA04-0393. a Development Plan. submitted bv Curry Brandaw Architects. to construct. establish. and operate a four-story senior conqreqate care facility consistinq of 115 units on 2.1 acres and an exception to the development standards to reduce the on site parkinq requirements bv 13 spaces. located on the southeast corner of Villaqe Road and Township Road within the Harveston Specific Plan. Matthew Harris. Associate Planner By way of overheads, Associate Planner Harris presented the staff report (of record), noting that . in the Specific Plan, a conceptual plan was proposed for a mixed-use Village which was to R:IMinutesPCI011905 8 . . . encompass an assisted living facility; that the proposed use would be for ambulatory residents in their late 70s and 80s; that it be a four-story structure (106,882 square feet) and would be located on 2.1 acres; that, as per the Development Plan, parking requirements will be 81 spaces (covered and uncovered spaces); that the applicant has requested an exception to the Development Standards, reducing the total number of parking spaces to 68 (34 covered and 34 uncovered); that this parking reduction has been requested because fewer than 25% of the residents own vehicles; that the facility will include the operation of a 20-passenger shuttle bus; that because of those two factors, staff would concur with the requested reduction in parking; that the applicant has agreed to construct a tower at the intersection of the Village similar to the one for ABC Preschool; and that the proposed building height (50'), as per the Development Code, will be below the maximum requirement for the lot. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Highlighting the proposed project, Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Lennar Communities, commented on the intent of the Village - to provide a variety of uses and requested the Commission's approval. For Chairman Mathewson, Mr. Fagan elaborated on how the Preschool and the proposed facility will provide a vibrant streetscape community, stating that the Main Street leads to numerous different places - park, lake park, community park, etc. By way of an exhibit, Mr. Garth Brandaw, representing the Holiday Retirement Corporation, provided background information with regard to the Holiday Retirement Corporation as well as the services provided to its residents; advised that the Corporation is a community-oriented facility; that for the majority, the residents of the Retirement facility enjoy being a part of the community, next to a school, daycare center, single-family residences, etc. Highlighting the proposed facility, Mr. Brandaw noted the following; . That the proposed height of the facility will 45' which will be 5' below the allowable height of the Specific Plan; . That the view corridors/visual impact of this project will be very limited; . That a tremendous amount of wall articulation, patios, terraces, roof elements, etc. will be provided; . That 115 suites would be the minimum number of suites necessary to make this project economically feasible; In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Brandaw clarified the following: . That three different types of suites will be offered - 60% one-bedroom suites, 30% studios, and 10% two-bedroom suites; . That no cooking facilities are provided within the suites; . That no nursing care/medication monitoring will be provided at this facility. Mr. Kevin Lynch, representing Lennar Communities, advised that the ABC Preschool as well as the Holiday Retirement Corporation were delicately picked by Lennar and requested the Commission's support of the project. R:\MinutesPC\011905 9 Wanting businesses specific to the community as well as ones that will continue to add value to . the community, Mr. Lynch, in response to Commissioner Olhasso, advised that the retail leasing process is progressing, noting that he would estimate that there will be approximately 5,000 to 7,000 square feet of retail available. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the proposed project: Ms. Bonnie Adams Harveston Community resident Ms. Kim Juarez Harveston Community resident Ms. Christina Grade Harveston Community resident Mr. Roger Logan Harveston Community resident Ms. Saundra Stormer-Simm - Harveston Community resident Mr. Anthony Reiter Harveston Community resident Mr. Jason Ehmke Harveston Community resident Mr. Spencer Simm Harveston Community resident Mr. Mike Bender Harveston Community resident (submitted a petition of opposition to the proposed facility signed by 200 Harveston residents) . The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition to the project for the following reasons and offered the following suggestions: . Lack of a Village feel . Height of the proposed building (45') . When signing paper work to purchase into the Harveston Community, were advised that there would be no buildings higher than two story; . Suggested underground parking to further reduce the height of the proposed building; . No opposition to a retirement community of a smaller scale; . Mass, along the street, of the proposed building; . Aesthetically not pleasing; would impact the small-town feeling of the Harveston Community; . Safety and traffic concerns (speed/increased traffic flow/not stopping at stop signs) considering its close proximity to the preschool and residences; . Would prefer a building no higher than two stories; . R:\MinutesPC\011905 10 . . . . Proposed building should be no higher than 35' and possibly permitting a three-story building; . Lack of continuity, as throughout the community, of the tower element on the proposed building; . Fire Department/ambulance access for medical assistance and its impacts on the existing residents; At 8:15 P.M., Chairman Mathewson called a short recess and reconvened the meeting at 8:23 P.M. and continued with the public hearing. . Lack of on-site parking for the residents of this facility as well as staff; . Scale of the proposed building inappropriate for a residential neighborhood; . Residents were not apprised of the proposed apartments/retirements facility/etc.; . Potential use of the Harveston Community bus by this facility's residents; that the Harveston Community bus is paid for the residents of Harveston. By way of overheads, at this time, Mr. Garth Brandaw, representing the applicant, responded to the above-mentioned comments as follows: . Parking ratio - .6 spaces per suite (including residents, staff, and visitors) of the existing 300 facilities that Holiday Retirement Corporation operates has been sufficient for the residents; . Mass/scale - structure will not be imposing on any view corridor; scale of the structure would be appropriate within the community; . Proposed structure necessary in order to make this facility economically viable. At this time, the public hearing was closed. In response to the Commissioners, Associate Planner Harris provided clarification and input as follows: . that the Specific Plan would permit a variety of different types of mixed uses for this particular site such as banks, barber shops, Boys and Girls Clubs, catering services, religious institution, office building, etc.; that the religious institution and office building would be in similar magnitude to what the applicant is proposing and of these two uses, an office building would generate more traffic; that a higher density could have been permitted on this parcel of discussion as long as the FAR requirements are met; . that no single-family residence will directly abut this facility; that some single-family residences will be located kitty corner from the proposed project (230' distance); . that the Specific Plan does not permit access either on Township or Village Roads and, therefore, access to the facility was relocated; R:\MinutesPC\011905 11 . that, as per the Specific Plan, the maximum height limit is 50'; . . that in an effort to create a pedestrian-oriented Village as to scale and design, as per the Specific Plan, special concentration has been given to the first-story of the building; . that originally the applicant had requested 120 units; that number has been reduced to 115 units in order to address staff's concern with parking; . that considering the small constraints of the proposed site, sub grade parking would not be economically feasible. Having been a part of this project since its inception and having attended tours provided by Mr. Fagan of other Lennar projects, Commissioner Guerriero noted that even though the proposed project will meet the City's guidelines, he does not recall seeing a four-story congregate care facility at any of those sites and that in his opinion, a four-story structure would not be suitable for this community. Although concurring with the need for congregate care in the City of Temecula, Mr. Guerriero questioned the size/mass of this particular project within the Harveston Community and its economic viability. Expressing his support of the residents' concerns with regard to the size of the proposed structure, Mr. Guerriero noted that the proposed size would be too large for a residential-village concept. Commending the applicant on the articulation of the proposed building, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that the issue would be massing and expressed his concurrence with Commissioner Guerriero's comment that the proposed structure would be too high for this community. Mr. Chiniaeff as well expressed concern with the applicant's request to reduce the number of . parking spaces, noting that by reducing the number of units, additional parking spaces could be provided. Disappointed by the limited amount of square feet of retail, Commissioner Olhasso expressed her opposition to the proposal. Because the approved Specific Plan would permit the construction of a structure up to 50' in height, Assistant City Attorney Curley, for Commissioner Telesio, advised that the Specific Plan does create a menu/range of opportunities, noting that the application before the Commission is a Development Plan which does require specific findings with regard to General Health, Safety, and Welfare. Based on findings that the Commission will provide, Mr. Curley advised that Commission may deny a four-story structure even though it would be permitted under the Specific Plan. Echoing concern with regard to the height and massing of the proposed project, Chairman Mathewson expressed concem with on-site parking, viewing the facility as under parked and questioned whether the proposed project would be compatible with the overall Harveston scheme. Having approved the Specific Plan, Mr. Mathewson relayed his expectation of varied residential products but also the development of a true mairi street retail opportunity, noting that the main street concept must be developed with retail opportunities and noted that the proposed project would not be a project heading into that main street concept direction. At this time, Mr. Mathewson recommended that the applicant address the noted issues and encouraged the applicant to explore the possibility of retail within its facility. Concurring with Chairman Mathewson's comment, Commissioner Olhasso stated that she . would not view, at this time, the village center concept as a vital concept. R:\MinutesPC\011905 12 . . . By eliminating one story from the proposed facility, Commissioner Telesio noted that such a reduction would not address the noted concerns with regard to the lack of retail, commenting on the location of such a facility within the village. If the proposed project were scaled down, Mr. Telesio questioned whether that would provide the desired type of retail concept. Commenting on the desired retail opportunities and the available locations for such opportunities, Commissioner Chiniaeff viewed the proposed use as acceptable. As per the Site Plan, Mr. Chiniaeff, with the exception of the proposed structure being four stories tall, has addressed concerns raised by the residents, such as: orientation, larger buffer to residential, etc., noting that basic questions would be whether or not the Commission is desirous of the proposed use. Referencing the concept of the Specific Plan, Mr. Chiniaeff commented on the Commission's original support of the retail component. Commissioner Guerriero reiterated that lack of commercial/retail element within the Harveston Community. Planning Director Ubnoske requested that the Commission consider a continuance for the applicant in effort to achieve a compromise between the City and the applicant. In an effort to address the noted concerns/comments, Mr. Brandaw relayed the applicant's desire to be given the opportunity to review other options and expressed support of a continuance. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue this matter to the March 2, 2005, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero. Chairman Mathewson suggested the formation of a subcommittee. Commissioner Guerriero requested that staff contact those in attendance of this meetings to ensure notification of the continuance to the March 2, 2005, Planning Commission meeting AMENDED MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue this matter to the March 2, 2005, Planning Commission meeting and requested that those residents in attendance of this meeting be informed of the continuance to the March 2, 2005, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. At 9:30 P.M., Chairman Mathewson called a short recess and reconvened the Commission meeting at 9:37 P.M. Item No.4 discussed out of order; see page 2. 4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0550. a Maior Modification to a Development Plan. submitted by Brian Price. Breckenridqe Group. to allow exterior elevation chanqes and the conversion of a Coco's Restaurant to a Ruby's Diner. located at 26495 Ynez Road. west of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive in the Palm Plaza Shoppinq Center. Matt Peters. Associate Planner Associate Planner Peters highlighted the staff report (of record), referencing supplemental material distributed to the Commission; advising that this particular item had been continued from the December 15, 2004, Commission; and summarizing the following design changes: R:IMinutesPCI01 1 905 13 removal of the tower element, replacement of the red accent bands on the cornice with grey . accent bands; replacement of the red ceramic tile in the base to grey tile; allowing red LED lighting within the red accent band subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning; permitting red entry doors; and permitting red awnings a white valance. Mr. Peters advised that staff would recommend approval as modified, as noted above, with the conditions of approval. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Associate Planner Peters noted that the applicant is in concurrence with the recommended modifications and the conditions of approval. Commissioner Olhasso expressed her preference of red awnings with red valances versus a white valances. Responding to the Commissioners, Mr. Brian Price, representing the applicant, noted that there was no intent to retexture the building because it will match the existing buildings in the center and voiced no opposition to the proposed conditions of approval and the recommended design changes. At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff recommendation with the design modifications, as noted above by staff, along with an amendment to include red awnings with red valances. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS . A. Commissioner Olhasso questioned whether a Commission ad hoc committee should be formed to address the retail issue in the Harveston Community. It was recommended that the applicant explore residential over retail. B. Thanking outgoing Chairman Telesio on a job well done, Commissioner Guerriero congratuiated incoming Chairman Mathewson on his newly appointed position. Due to his work responsibilities, Mr. Guerriero apologized to the Commission for the meetings he has missed. C. Appreciating the opportunity to serve as Commission Chairman, Mr. Mathewson encouraged the formation of an ad hoc committee to address the retail issues in the Harveston Community. Commissioners Guerriero and Telesio offered to serve on the committee. In response to Chairman Mathewson, Planning Director Ubnoske advised that she would confirm with the Public Works Department on how long the sand operation on Rancho California Road, next to the Kating apartments, will continue. D. In light of this evening's discussion with regard to the Harveston Community, Commissioner Chiniaeff commented on the need to address the type of information that is being disclosed through the sales offices to potential buyers, suggesting a signed specific form and/or by the applicant/developer posting each site of its future use. . R:\MinutesPCI01190S 14 . . . PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. Advising the Commission that Mr. Lynch, representing Harveston Community, has informed staff that the maintenance and replacement of street sign within the community will be the City's full responsibility, Planning Director Ubnoske noted that staff has been working with the developer in an effort to obtain requested information pertaining to the street signs, noting that typical street signs cost $200 to $300 per sign and that the specific street signs for the Harveston Community cost approximately $2,000 per sign. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to extend the meeting to 10:00 P.M. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. As part of the overall Planning Commission's approval process of the Harveston Community project, Chairman Mathewson commented on the uniqueness of this project that was presented to the Commission and expressed concern with the limited amount of uniqueness as this project is coming to completion and, therefore, requested that the Commissioners be given the opportunity to meet with the City Manager or the City Councilmernbers to discuss this matter. Commissioner Olhasso noted that the street signs for Meadowview and Los Ranchitos are replaced at the City's expense. ADJOURNMENT At 10:01 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetinq to be held on Wednesday. Februarv 2. 2005 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning Dave Mathewson Chairman R:IMinutesPCI011905 15 . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 2, 2005 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:02 P.M., on Wednesday, February 2, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio, and Chairman Mathewson. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS Chairman Mathewson informed the audience that, as per Fire Code requirements, any individual not seated will need to exit the City Council Chamber to the Main Conference Room which has been opened for overflow seating. Chairman Mathewson also implored the audience to remain courteous to speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 2, 2005 2 A request to rescind Planninq Commission Resolution 2004-066 which approved Planninq Application No. PA04-0260, a Development Plan for an additional 20 units at the approved Temecula Ridqe Apartments to result in the desiqn, construction and operation of a 240- unit. two and three-story apartment complex with a pool. clubhouse, workout buildinq and tot lot on approximately 21 acres located at the southeast corner of Rancho California Road and Moraqa Road, known as Assessor's Parcel No. 944-290-011 MOTION: Chairman Mathewson moved to approve the Consent Calendar Item Nos, 1-2. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Chairman Mathewson announced to the audience that the Planning Commission will only be focusing on the Circulation Element of the General Plan Update and that all other elements will R:IMinutesPCI020205 1 be considered at another Planning Commission meeting. He also informed those individuals wishing to speak with regard to the Anza Circulation Element should address their issues and concerns with the County. . Clarifying the hearing process, Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that Chairman Mathewson would be abstaining with regard to issues pertaining to Meadowview, North General Kearney, and Kahwea. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3 A General Plan Update to comprehensivelv update the followinq elements of the General Plan: Land Use Circulation. Open Space/Conservation. Growth Manaqement/Public Facilities. Public Safety. Noise. Air Quality. Community Desiqn. and Economic Development 3.1 Recommend that the City Council approve the Updated General Plan of Land Use, Open Space/Conservation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Public Safety, Noise, Air Quality, Economic Development, and Community Design Elements Principal Planner Hogan offered the following comments: . That the Update to the General Plan process began in 2001 with a Council Appointment of a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) representing local citizens, local businesses, and community organizations . That the purpose of the Committee was to work with staff and consultants to create a . General Plan that would update the existing 1993 General Plan and address issues within the community. At this time, Mr. Hogan introduced Mr. Henderson and Ms. Stetson of Cotton/Bridges and Associates. By way of PowerPoint, Mr. Henderson highlighted the Draft General Plan, noting the following: Status of General Plan . Public Comment period for Environmental Report (EIR) will end March 12,2005 . Responses to agency comments to be distributed prior to City Council Hearing scheduled in March 2005 . Airport Land Use Commission Determination of Consistency is pending . California Geological Survey review of Safety Element completed (recommended changes to Safety Element identified in staff report) . R:\MinutesPC\020205 2 . General Plan Elements . Land Use . Circulation . Housing (2002 Update) . Open Space/Conservation Element . Growth Management/Public Facilities Element . Public Safety Element . Noise Element . Air Quality Element . Community Design Element . Economic Development Element The above mentioned elements are from the previous General Plan and have had some form of update in the current effort. . General Plan Chanqes . Overall policy direction will remain consistent . Most proposed changes will fit within the framework of the current General Plan . Changes primarily affect the Land Use and Circulation Elements . Technical changes to the Plan are based on: . Changed circumstances, facts, and new information . Consolidation of similar policies . Updated implementation programs for each element . New policy directions . Encouraging mixed-use development near 1-15 corridor . Preserving established rural areas - Nicolas Valley, winery locations, SR 79 South, and Anza Road Land Use Policv Map . . Several recommended changes reviewed with City Council/Planning Commission Workshop in August 2004 R:IMinutesPCI020205 3 . Additional property owner requests described in staff report . . Rural residential . Vineyards/Agriculture . Tribal Trust Lands . Commercial Recreation Overlay . Industrial Park . Remaining Land Uses . Changes in French Valley . Plan will reflect entitlements granted by the County . Preservation of Open Space corridors . Consistency with French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALCUP) Circulation Element Primary Chanqes to policy direction: . . Provisions that allow for additional street dedication at high-volume intersections . CAC recommendation to consider opening closed connecting streets to improve City- wide circulation . New roadway cross-sections are introduced such as Modified Secondary Arterial, a Limited Secondary Arterial, and a Rural Highway; that these new roadway designations are not present in the current General Plan and are recommended for the updated General Plan . New Roadways are introduced in the roadway plan such as: Loma LindalAvenida de Missiones, Eastern/Southern Bypass, Sky Canyon Drive/Briggs Road . Roadway Improvements: within the Rancho California 1-15 corridor Roadway Plan Residents Concerns . Rainbow Canyon Road - Collector or Secondary Arterial . R:IMinutesPCI020205 4 . . . CAC Recommendation (not part of the Draft General Plan that is before the Planning Commission) . North General Kearny - Limited Secondary, La Colima to Nicolas Roads Chanaes to Other Elements Growth ManaaementlPublic Facilities . New statement will discourage street closures that may limit or delay access to emergency services Open Space/Conservation Element . New discussion of historic and cultural resources Community Desian Element . New discussion of mixed-use design concepts . Policies and implementation encouraging creation of public spaces and public art Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Draft EIR circulatina for public review and comment . 5 comment letters received to date . Responses will be in final EIR Sianificant unavoidable impact . Air Quality - short term construction impact . Air Quality - long term emissions exceed standards for particulate matter . Transportation - 3 intersections and 6 freeway ramps projected to operate below LOS standards All other impacts found to be less than sianificant . Required mitigation measures are incorporated in the General Plan as Implementation Findinas and statement of overridina considerations At this time, Mr. Henderson concluded his PowerPoint Presentation. Principal Planner Hogan presented the Planning Commission with additional changes to the General Plan Update (see staff report) R:IMinutesPCI020205 5 For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Assistant City Attorney Curley clarified that because the Planning . Commission would be acting as an advisory body making recommendations to the City Council, the Commission would not be required to adhere to the closing period for the EIR. In response to the Commissioner's Chiniaeff's query, Principal Planner Hogan stated that the proposed General Plan will be consistent with the current Housing Element. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hogan relayed that although the challenges and efforts of coordinating continual growth with the County will continue, with a newly elected representative on the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, improved awareness of the need to manage growth and to match it with resources is present. He noted that staff would be of the opinion that by incorporating and addressing the issues in the General Plan, it will give staff more weight and authority when dealing with the County. Deputy Public Works Director Parks stated that the City has been successful in challenging the County's approval of specific plans for the French Valley area; that staff has required the County to approve to require certain street improvements/infrastructure prior to the County's issuance of building permits; that the City has been proactive in working with the County; and that by including it in the General Plan, it would provide the City additional support. It was reiterated by Chairman Mathewson that all non-Meadowview related circulation matters will be addressed first and that he would be abstaining from any Meadowview-related circulation aspects. Principal Planner Hogan presented a brief staff report regarding Rainbow Canyon Road, . highlighting the following: . That when the General Plan was adopted in 1993, Rainbow Canyon Road was designated as a secondary arterial 88' right-of-way . That during the planning process, the recommendation was to retain it as an 88' right-of- way . That staff has received several letters from residents in the Rainbow Canyon area concerned with retaining Rainbow Canyon Road as a Secondary Arterial . That the residents' primary concern would be the difference in the current size of Rainbow Canyon Road (a collector with a 66' right-of-way) as that from the current General Plan designation (Secondary Arterial with an 88' right-of-way) . That staff would recommend that the roadway designation for Rainbow Canyon remain as a Secondary Arterial; and that once the Southern Bypass has been completed, the City will have an opportunity to readdress the designation of this roadway. Expanding on Mr. Hogan's comments, Director of Public Works Hughes stated that the current designation for Rainbow Canyon Road is as an 88' right-of-way with four lanes; that this designation would be an appropriate classification and should not be downgraded; and that with the new interchange and the Eastern Bypass connecting to the south, larger capacity road would be necessary; and that Rainbow Canyon Road is the only alternate route to the 1-15. . R:IMinutesPCI020205 6 . . . For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hughes stated that, in his opinion, the appropriate right-of-way width was not required when the existing 12 homes were buill; that there is a deficient right-of- way width along Rainbow Canyon Road for these 12 home fronting Rainbow Canyon Road; and that staff would be of the opinion that options are available to widen the road without impacting the existing homes, reiterating the need for these four lanes. In response to Chairman Mathewson, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks stated that the current 66' right-of-way on Rainbow Canyon Road would accommodate for two lanes and an additional 22' would be needed to accommodate for the 88' right-of-way. In response to the Commissioners, Mr. Parks offered the following comments: . That the subdivision was approved by the County and built as a County Plan . That the County had envisioned Rainbow Canyon Road as a 66' right-of-waylresidential collector . That the County did not perform a Circulation Element for the City . That once the City performed its first General Plan and Circulation Element, the City could foresee the potential need for four-lane road (88' right-of-way) . That as development occurs in the area, the City will be making the design to that particular standard. Assistant City Attorney Curley clarified that General Plan level planning does not create any exposure to any claim against a City, noting it is recognized that it is part of a long-range planning process. At this time, the public hearing was opened. The following individuals spoke in opposition of the Rainbow Canyon Road Draft General Plan Update: . Mr. David Payne . Ms. Renea Broderick . Mr. Mark Broderick . Ms. Roberta Adkins . Ms. Adrian McGregor . Ms. Kathleen Montaldo . Mr. Bernie Thomas The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition to widening Rainbow Canyon Road for the following reasons: . Potential destructions of the 12 existing homes . Significant noise, air, light, and aesthetic impacts the future 1-15 interchange and Bypass will create . Significant impacts with regard to air quality and transportation R:\MinutesPC\020205 7 . Traffic impacts . Property depreciation for the existing 12 homes that front Rainbow Canyon Road . Speaking in support of the proposed General Plan, Mr. Mike Kuhn, Temecula resident, noted that every community in the City should be considered as a whole and that the entire City would benefit from the Draft General Plan. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Addressing the above-mentioned concerns, Public Works Director Hughes stated the following: . That the current designation for Rainbow Canyon Road as a four-lane, secondary arterial has existed since 1988 . That the impacted residents would be compensated at fair market value . That with regard to the Eastern Bypass and the new interchange, staff does realize the challenges with coordinating the connection work; that the 1-15/SR 79 Interchange will be upgraded whether or not the Eastern Bypass Interchange is completed; and that . although the road widening will create impacts, the City will be required to mitigate them . That the City has plan on improving the operations near SR 79 South/I-15 . That staff is not aware of any legislation, guaranteeing transmission lines along any . route that would connect with a freeway. Mr. Hughes clarified projects that are currently funded for the SR 79 South: . Upgrade SR 79 South/I-15 to be completed in the next five to seven years . Upon City control of SR 79 South, the existing lanes will be restripped to eight lanes between Pechanga Parkway and the freeway northbound ramps; that a median will be installed from 1-15 to Butterfield Stage Road to assist with capacity and constricting turning movements Commissioner Chiniaeff, echoed by Commissioner Olhasso, stated that the City should be planning to create parkways that have limited access and would allow traffic flow without impacting and accessing local streets. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that Rainbow Canyon Road should be retained as an 88' right-of- way; that the interchange is necessary and should be included in the Draft General Plan; and that Anza between SR 79 South, near Auld Road, should be upgraded to a four-lane secondary road. Although expressing her support of the SR 79 South/I-15 Interchange, Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with the current designation for Rainbow Canyon Road (88' right-of-way). . R:IMinutesPCI020205 8 . For Commissioner Guerriero, Public Works Director Hughes advised that the proposed upgrades for Loma Linda Road will not impact Pechanga Parkway or SR 79 S. For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Hughes relayed that there are plans for development on Pechanga Parkway, including a golf course; that staff has had on-going conversations with the Tribal Council regarding secondary access to the casino; that while there is no firm commitment at this particular time, the Tribal Council does understand the traffic impacts; that the City has discussed the possibility of reserving corridors that such roadways but that the Tribal Council has made no commitment. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to recommend that the City Council adopt the Draft General Plan Update as presented by staff, including retaining Rainbow Canyon Road as an 88' right-of-way and upgrading SR 79 South to a secondary arterial with limited access as determined by traffic studies. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Removing himself from the dais, Chairman Mathewson abstained from the following discussion. At 8:03 P.M., a short recess was called and at 8:10 P.M. the Commission reconvened. Vice-Chairman Guerriero thanked the audience for their patience and stated the following issues to be discussed would be the North General Kearny Kahwea elements. . Vice Chairman Guerriero informed the public that additional seating was available in the downstairs lobby area. At this time, the public hearing was opened. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the extension of North General Kearny Road: . Ms. Lisa Stute Kardouce Mr. Joseph Wasek, Jr. . Mr. Nicolas Kardouche Mr. Steve Gossett . Ms. Maria Hetzner Ms. Linda Gossett . Mr. Richard Moriki Ms. Jennie Strutz . Mr. Norman Clark Mr. Robert Johnston . Ms. Lisa Weinmann Mr. John Austin . Mr. Williams Herrmann Ms. Nancy Ray . Ms. Diana Lovett-Webb Ms. Ellen Ellish . Mr. Terry Stute Ms. Adrian Mc Gregor . Ms. Cheryl Huber Mr. Peter Francheschina . Mr. Brett Saunders Mr. Jerry Throckmorton . Mr. Bernie Thomas Ms. Teri Biancardi . Ms. Lori Nelson Ms. Jessica Christopher . Mr. Jon Andrews The above-mentioned individuals spoke in opposition for the following reasons: . That building a road through Meadowview to even traffic flow will not be a solution . . That the citizens of Temecula should not have to be impacted as a result of City actions R:IMinutesPCI020205 9 . That solutions must be explored - especially ones that will not continue to destroy the neighborhoods and the City . . That Meadowview was created long before the traffic congestion . That no more construction permits should be granted . That extending North General Kearny Road would directly overlap with the use of the trails (bikers, horseback rides, walkers, and daily joggers) . That the City has a long and colorful history associated with the horse from Native American to the famous Vail and Roripaugh Ranches, the Stage Coach, and Pony Express; that horses have always been here; and that the City has a unique history for suburban area and horses have always been a part of it . That Meadowview is zoned as low-density residential with open space . That horse ownership is inherent in this zoning designation . That a General Plan goals is to preserve rural communities within Temecula and to preserve the quality and value of a single family neighborhood . That drivers tend to ignore horse crossing signs . That by opening Kahwea Road, the risk of horse/car accidents would increase . . That by extending North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads, the City would not be adhering to the goal to preserve rural areas and that the extension would not complement the zoning designation for Meadowview . That extending North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads would create a safety concern for the Meadowview residents . That there currently are existing traffic problems on residential streets such as Calle Pina Colada, Via Norte, Del Rey, and Avenida de Barca . That by opening another road into the Meadowview, the traffic congestion will significantly worsen . That Meadowview roads such as Del Rey and Via Norte were designed for low-density traffic usage; that drivers, not familiar with the Meadowview area, will not be accustomed to driving on streets with no sidewalks, streets with trails, and no lights . That the Meadowview area has numerous housing densities (two churches, a school, a public park, a doctor's office, and an equestrian center). which contribute to congestion. The following individuals spoke in favor of the proposed Draft General plan: . Ms. Evelyn Buchanan . Mr. Brian Harrold . Mr. Mike Kuhn . R:IMinutesPCI020205 10 . . Ms. Susan Zychovich . Ms. Diana Broderick . Ms. Jessica Christopher The above-mentioned individuals spoke in favor of the extension of North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads for the following reasons: . That the City of Temecula must take responsibility of opening roads and planned roads in the City, including North General Kearny Road . That Meadowview residents should have equal access to emergency services . That opening roads will help balance the traffic flow in other congested areas . That the removal of fences/barriers would assist local residents with daily driving routes . That the Meadowview residents should have equal access to traffic circulation . That the closed roads in Meadowview were planned to accommodate local traffic That Meadowview is within the City; that the streets are paid for and maintained by City services, funded by tax dollars; that the Meadowview streets are not private; that they are public streets and should be utilized as such; that maps show North General Kearny Road and Kahwea Roads as through streets . . That Meadowview may choose to be a private gated community, privately funding all required services and closing its streets to public access . . That opening North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads will not add more trips to City streets; that it will decrease traffic on Calle Medusa, Calle Pina Colada, Winchester, and Margarita Roads; and that residents of Calle Medusa and Calle Pina Colada should not have to bear the burden of daily local traffic . That by providing alternate traveling routes, traffic congestion on heavily burdened streets will decrease . That in an effort to create proper circulation, alternative routes are necessary; that all residents should share in the solution and benefits of improved circulation. Although always dependent on the location of the emergency, Fire Marshal McBride noted that road closures will negatively impact response times. Principal Planner Hogan offered the following comments: . That there would be one lane in each direction with space for a left-turn lane . . That in an attempt to design a road to minimize conflicts, the cross-section would have a separated trail from the roadway; that this would be an attempt to separate pedestrians and equestrians from the road surface; and that this cross-section is not currently in the existing General Plan but would be a proposed addition R:IMinutesPCI020205 11 . That when the Public Traffic Safety Commission reviewed this item, it was difficult for the Commission to achieve a recommendation with regard to the extension; that the Commissioners who opposed the extension were of the opinion that the extension would not be necessary to improve circulation efforts; that the Commissioners who were in favor of the extension were of the opinion that it was necessary to improve emergency access and response times; and that it was also noted by a Commissioner that traffic affects all residents and that a street closure would adversely impact all residents. Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that the City has a traffic problem that must be resolved and that the extension of North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads should be reflected in the General Plan for studying. Deputy Director Thornhill offered the following comments: . That the City has made limited General Plan changes . That City has constructed the Overland Bridge, provided improvements around the perimeter of the Promenade Mall, and installed signals near the Promenade Mall - totaling over $ 35 million . That the Promenade Mall generates $4 million a year in retail sales tax - monies which are then utilized for new road construction and Capital Improvement Projects . That the Roripaugh project at Pourroy and Nicholas Roads was preapproved by the County under development agreements prior to City incorporation . That the City inherited 10 to 11 thousand homes that were preapproved by the County under development agreements which the City was obligated to process and approve; that in addition, the City has had three Specific Plans that were transferred cases in 1990 from the County such as Wolf Creek, Harveston, and Roripaugh . That the City has been very judicial in its review and approval of projects. At this time, it was the consensus of the Planning Commission to extend the meeting another 20 minutes. At this time, the public hearing was closed. For the Planning Commission, Mr. Thornhill stated that Kahwea Road is not a General Plan element; that the Planning Commission would be dealing with a policy regarding the opening of closed streets; and that no separate action regarding Kahwea Road would be necessary. COMMISSION DISCUSSION . . Commenting on the importance of preserving the City's rural areas, Commissioner Olhasso advised that she could not support the opening of North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads. Although stating that the extension of North General Kearny and Kahwea Roads should be reflected in the General Plan, Commissioner Telesio, echoed by Commissioner Guerriero, . recommended that, at this time, no funding be proposed until a complete and comprehensive study of the area has been performed. R:IMinutesPCI020205 12 . . . MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to extend the Planning Commission's meeting another 20 minutes. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman Mathewson who abstained. MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to recommend to the City Council that the extension of North General Kearny Road be reflected in the General Plan but that no funding be proposed until a comprehensive study has been completed. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Olhasso who voted no and Chairman Mathewson who abstained. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to support the policy of opening roads. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Chairman Mathewson who abstained. It was the consensus of Commissioners Chiniaeff, Telesio, and Guerriero to start future Planning Commission meetings at 6:30 p.m. versus 6:00 P.M. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT No reports. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report ADJOURNMENT At 11 :45 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular meetina to be held on Wednesday. Februarv 16, 2005 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dave Mathewson Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\020205 13 . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2005 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, February 16, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Chairman Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Chiniaeff, Telesio, and Chairman Mathewson. Absent: Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Owners of 22 acres of property off Walcott Lane in the City of Temecula, Mr. Ed and Steven Galvez, Temecula, advised that in October 2003 a letter was submitted to the General Plan Advisory Committee, requesting a change in zone; that preliminary studies have been completed; and that an agreement had been reached with the Roripaugh Ranch project to deposit 100,000 cubic yards of dirt to level the property and to engineer a storm drain channel from Butterfield Stage to Walcott Lane. Dependent on the approval of the Map and the zone change request, Mr. Galvez advised that it would be their intent to contribute toward the paving of Liefer Road. By way of overheads, Mr. Galvez described the location of his property. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 16, 2005. 2 Director's Hearinq Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for January, 2005. R:IMinutesPCI021605 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero and Commissioner Olhasso who were absent. . PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Continued from February 2, 2005 3 A General Plan Update to comprehensivelv update the followinq elements of the General Plan: Land Use. Open Space/Conservation. Growth ManaqementlPublic Facilities. Public Safetv, Noise. Air Qualitv. Communitv Desiqn. and Economic Development - David Hoqan, Principal Planner In light of the significance of this matter and considering the absences of two Commissioners, Chairman Mathewson advised that it would be the desire of the Commission to continue this item to the March 16, 2005, Commission meeting. For those individuals that may not be able to attend the March 16, 2005, Planning Commission meeting, Mr. Mathewson encouraged them to submit their comments in writing to staff. At this time, Chairman Mathewson opened the public hearing. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue this public hearing to the March 16, 2005, Planning Commission meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who . were absent. New Items 4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0178 - Tract Map submitted bv Scott Carino to subdivide 28.6 acres into 71 sinqle-familv residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7.200 square feet and will include a pedestrian trail alonq the southern portion 0 the proposed subdivision near the creek (located on the north side of Nicolas Road, east of Joseph Road) - Christine Damko. Associate Planner Chairman Mathewson noted that it has been recommended by staff that this item be continued to the Commission meeting of March 16, 2006. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to continue this item to the Commission meeting of March 16, 2005. The motion was seconded by Commissioner T elesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were absent. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS No additional comments. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No additional comment. . R:IMinutesPCI021605 2 . . . ADJOURNMENT At 6:15 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetinq to be held on Wednesday. March 2, 2005 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dave Mathewson Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\021605 3 . ITEM #3 . . . . . Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 30, 2005 Title: Assistant Planner Prepared by: Christine Damko File Number PA04-0476 Application Type: Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) Planning Application No. PA04-0476 is a request for a Development Plan to construct two officelretail buildings totaling 18,237 square feet on 2.5 acres. Building A is 6,323 square feet and Building B is 11,908 square feet. The project site is located on the south side of Pauba Road, an estimated 312 feet west of the intersection of Margarita and Pauba Road in the City of Temecula. (Assessor's Parcel Number 945- 110-002) [:gJ Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial o Categorically Exempt (Class) o Notice of Determination (Section) [:gJ Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\D P'\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\STAFF REPORT.doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: Completion Date: Matthew Fagan March 1 , 2004 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: March 30, 2005 General Plan Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Public Park and Recreation (vacant) Low Density Residential (existing single family residences) Neighborhood Commercial (existing shopping center) Low Density Residential (vacant) Lot Area: 2.54 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio 18237 square feet/.16 . Landscape Area/Coverage 27,712 square feet/25.8 % Parking Required/Provided 60 spaces / 61 spaces provided (credits used for provision of bicycle and motorcycle spaces) BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~ 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. An application for a Development Plan was submitted on July 19, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on September 30, 2004 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture and other departmental issues. The applicant submitted revised plans on February 7, 2005. Between the resubmittal date and the DRC meeting, staff and the applicant have worked together to produce a project that meets all City codes and ordinances. The proposed building will be constructed of various materials, including precision block, stucco, and galvanized metal. The building provides both roof height variations and building articulations as required by the City's Design Guidelines. Access to the proposed buildings will be provided from a 24-foot wide drive aisle located on the northeast portion of the site off Pauba Road that partially exists due to the development of the neighboring shopping center to the east of the site. Landscaping will be provided around the site . measuring from 5 feet to 25 feet in width. Common areas are provided on the south and north elevations. R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\ST AFF REPORTdoc 2 . . . ANALYSIS Site Plan The project conforms to the development regulations of the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning district. The front building setbacks vary from 25 feet to more than 50 feet meeting and exceeding the setback requirements of the Development Code. The 0.16 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.25 for this zoning district and the proposed 9.3 percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 25 percent. The proposed project provides 61 parking spaces, while the parking requirement for this size of use is 60. One loading space has been provided along the west side of the building, thereby meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the Development Code. In addition, the proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site, as well as for emergency vehicles. The project proposes off-site grading to the residential property to the west which is owned by the same owner. However, this area will be contoured to blend with the existing hillside and will be planted according to Section 17.08.060 of the Development Code. Architecture The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The proposed architectural style of the building is an eclectic mix of simple contemporary and classical styles. Glass is used prominently to make use of natural lighting opportunities and energy efficiency. The block material provides a sense of durability and permanence. Building materials include precision block, stucco, and galvanized metal, designed and placed strategically to provide visual interest. The precision block will be in colors of yellow gold, mission, buff and terracotta. Floor to ceiling windows accentuate the individual entrances for each potential tenant. The buildings include various breaks in wall planes and the roof line. The roof forms of the building are varied pitch standing seam metal, and provide for unique outdoor pedestrian walking and break areas. A landscaped deck is visible on the roof from the north elevation, which faces Pauba Road, and provides additional visual interest from the streetscape. Access to the second floor and the roof deck is provided by an internal elevator and an outside stairway. The outside stairway is a necessary function and adds visual interest by breaking up the buildi[1g mass from the street view. The use of glass, exterior walkways and roof decks gives the building an inviting feel that welcomes people into the site. Landscapinq The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. Six species of trees and nine species of shrubs are proposed for this site. Tree species include California Sycamore, Western Redbud, Torrey Pine, Mexican Elderberry, Engelman Oak and Tipu Tree. The streetscape along Pauba Road will be planted with five 24" box Tipu Trees. Pacific Coast Iris, Autumn Sage and Firethorn will accent the frontage views. The main entrance is also framed with Pacific Coast Iris and the entryway will contain a landscaped median with a 36" box Engelman Oak and Iris. Six Engelman Oak Trees will provide shade for the courtyard off of Pauba Road, and seven California Sycamores will provide seasonal shade for the rear courtyard in the summer months and additional light in the fall. The perimeter of the site is fully landscaped and the parking area landscaping meets Development Code requirements. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\STAFF REPORT. doc 3 Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and soften . building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 27,712 square feet or 25.8 percent of the site, which meets the minimum 25 percent landscape requirements in the NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zone. There are existing 2:1 slopes along the south and west sides of the property. These areas will be irrigated and landscaped with an appropriate amount of groundcover, plants, and tress for erosion control that will consistent with Section 17.08.060 of the Development Code. In addition, the landscaping planted on these slopes will soften and partially screen the views from the existing single family residences looking over this project from the south. The project also provides landscaping around the perimeter of the site ranging from 5 feet to 25 feet in width and varied landscape setbacks around the building footprints. Access. Circulation and Parkinq The Department of Public Works has analyzed the proposed traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Access to the proposed building will be provided from a 24-foot wide drive aisle off Pauba Road. A portion of the drive aisle exists due to the development of the shopping center adjacent to the site. The applicant meets proposes 61 parking spaces, which meets the Development Code requirement of 60 spaces for the specific use. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8J 1. An Initial Study has been prepared and indicates that the project will not have a . potential for significant environmental impacts. Based on the following Initial Study, staff recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Plan PA04-0476, based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Neighborhood Commercial (NC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, convenience services, and office, as typical uses in the Neighborhood Commercial designation. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed retail/office buildings have been designed to be compatible with the surrounding buildings currently located adjacent to the subject site. In addition, the proposal is consistent with the development regulations of the Neighborhood Commercial . (NC) zoning district. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\ST AFF REPORT.doc 4 . . . 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Commercial Development Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 2. PC Resolution No. 2005-_- Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 3. Initial Study - Blue Page 8 R\D P\2004\Q4-0476 Pauba Road Offices\STAFF REPORT,doc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\ST AFF REPORT.doc 6 ,....."', .".""',,. ...u-..o_........__..,,"- """",_",_,._",~"",~~__",,,,,_'.""""''''''_^~'__~''_.'~'_''"~V''''''''''~__ ..."_..""""",...=."..._~,,..~,,~".,=~~~_.,,,,_>,,,,,,,_ ,.-,H,,-,''J'">''''''''--''' ~,.~,,,,_;__,,,,_-,.,,,,,,,,,...,", """'_"".._" '='~_'.,~""-,'''''~~ H'>I:6 ,!wQ~ro"ln'.W>l P"'ll'~"'d p""p""1j~~clI-",W '"'! .JOP.I!~"'~<'~~P! 3:)1:l103'v'llj saJ!lJO P~oH ~qn~d " , , , d<t . .. , :!iUI I ~ I I \\.'$~ . \-::::- ~\"\ tlH III I J r t ~ I I i' /"~"'''~'\\'\~J':::'';::~\\\\ Pld It! i ! I ~ ~ J ~ l _.,\~\ !~.., /j"'( ~i'~i h] f 5j! l i ~ ! t ~ . ~ l~ 1 ",- \....~ I 11:1,,' "11111111 ;! ,il"1 II,I '\ /\.-./,-- , . u., II . I ' . 1 '1 . . I [ . 1-- ,\ \ '" --,', IIiffi~t~ll'l!.llti{il jlf l~ .t li~:il _L_ \,_." -. , ! 11";" lip "l!' Ii, III ,II 'I', t -'I< ,h \\1",\ 11ll1Hl11ljljiJjlp! l!! i! lllli! I j Ijll,MIIr ;")i(- ".,; ;: II! i H).1i 1}!H:fh!1 i}ll I 1 f! (If f! 1 f ~ j ~ ~ifhdil-~~~" 1., ! ! ! llill! ImJimli !ll i I i 1 ; ill ! j ! 1 ! 11 U',II'[a-;(11 ,:: ElB888 EIEI - El0000E10E10000@!ElEl@0000Etitd~ " r...... /' / / I n q 113 ! f ~~~ H ] UJ dW I' ~~~ uld~ !H, . I I I 1 I , I ~ . ~ .~~~;L~ I , I ! " I I 1 t d ~ 'Illll,,'l; Ild'AII Jh '" ,HllllJ!J"hl ! '''''j =2~~" j , , ~ ~ ~ ~ B o ~ :i: ~ o. .tl . UUJ HIIIJ. IHI~ j~_ ~J ~l ! "11 I , , ~. " ,. .. . '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N ~~11 .' ~ . ~ -: ~ '" 0 ~ '-4~"'''"''''~''~''''I'''''-'O e..-.... ~NINNY1.;SJIlfll:JVJNOli'Q~J3H ","'_'. ",,' ,,"n, '.""m', I:='l :H:tnnJIIH:Jl:N JdV:)SONIf'l ~,." dnOI:lO 'v1:l8r-lVHlv' /'Ii ......~ ~' a-J:lWa....,,"""'JIC)~_..~~I_.........""VTl:a'Ql ~lat'QI..tlMlIMI&C> 0Wf-/'t OOOlfv::! 00 ~ \;/3l.N3::> aVY'lHV "\;/a ,~ ~---1 ----- -~----1 -----~-~------~ , ---;-~--~::::-~~-~~-=-------- , ~ ___ ~!=:::~~~r.:>/~- ; I ~.L:! 1;1;'1 ~ N :; _ ~ ~ .iL~~; ~Hi~i . , ! 'Ii ,.. , ~ .;U ! ::;::,::;"'ii mim!! l i ~~~h~ , I nBU ~~..~~~~~~ I I 111111111 , , S~~:I\~~ ... I illl~~;~;;~~ . ~u " , ~3~g~~ U~UilU~ , ll, . ~~~~~~ ~~~-.~~~~ "~.. - i i P , I j a i! .,j h~t i 1-- I:,ll" L Ii'll. ! .il ~.""", I :a~ ! 'II" Ill! j hi " H~~d ! n~~! 1"'1' ~. --1-' , 1m.! Ug ~ ~ .. H ~ ~::! ~ ;;( ", II. ~ ~ i! , " ~ a ~ tt:t:t:t:t: .: ~ ~ ~ Ii! 51 =1!H ~;; e g ;j ~ ::" ::i ! jl,! Ii /!! !' ili:,lll ii!;!l;i ~lhlll'! ~~dl ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !, I! () i ~ ~ i ~ ~ Ii !!!!H . :I! I - ill i i i Pldl ll"l'!" II! , I '!,ll " .PI I II , ! .1' 1 'I !.i. ". llinll lll!dlli il!l ~ I . ,,) .' ; . lw "h~H':I..gUP ~~I _!Ii' 2 L o !Hllj, HlldIHi;!lh ~ j 000 @ @ . 00 l I ~! 8IEBO e . 0 '" r DiD ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~""I-' " . 3j" l"m . r~~; .; Ii ". . !1!1:1 ! i .1l1 , ~ , o . :; 00 > > , 11 ~J ,fD ~. ~ I. i ~. Cl z F z <{ ....J ll.. >- a: <{ z :> :J w a: ll.. I I . I i I , ! ~ I I , I , i I I I I I i , , ! !. I ! I I ! ! I I . I I i I , I i i I I . ! ! I I I ! I , , i I I !. . - " ~I , c- ~ -- , oil< -, , d~ 'II II, ~. ~l!! III ii~ I~. I!I!I ii~ !!Ii - .. ,,~, d~ !II im t'li I;,: Ill! ~ 3 I;!I ~ !~!! !~IH~! 1111;; Uim!! , ~ i ~ ~ i ., ie! e E t ij e iH~Hh~1 l~H~ln! IHlhHi -1313l!lSeeee I jiit!h I ! .,'! · I ll.1 ~i~!i ~i" $iI', ~ ':~kjP ~ :l j ilii! ~ld ; n! I ~ Ii I! ' @ h~ Iii ~ ~ i.ii :~I'! &.......,=~" ~ ~'II Iii" ~ I" '> I' ~ ~ ~. ~~ o ~"' ~o ~~ ~ ~ ~ . . I , id Li\ ;i ". i~ ! ~ -- I t:~l~1!Z ~ ~ ~~ ~, ~u C~ t:~ " ill . . III . 1-.. i '. i :1:.. P ~:ii <!). . l' i: <-ClOlD It! ~ lI)::E"1 ,I. .. 0.. " !i! ~ "~l 1- ~ "A i: -lE ~'~I )( ....10 I - !~;. II w~f IoJia U 0. . I . ....,. ~~:':~--'"'="'''~ """"" .",,~<,,-<,~. ''',,"'*_....."'':'J.':~ _.- .....--""..~....~..."'._..~=~-~"'~:;::,:,'; ",,,;,,,~",,~.-.. P""lI'~ p"" ~~ ~:~~ ......_~..~_.."'~.....x,"..,...._..--" _._'-~ ~m+>~"","D<<C~P' DI:lI03Vllj P1!OH 1!qn1!d -- -.- I-.....'---.'.....~ j'1 , - . .... lid <( . I ' , 'I I I' ld " Ul'i d i! i H! Ii ~ :; j f {P .. ..11 j III i'!! ill )~~~llb~lM~l , , ii: , o o ii: '.: ~ ,- ii:! -I /- / /' . . \ ....w..._..~...~,~......"'....""'~.._..."""""...._,,,,_~,,_,.,..'~.,,.'........,."'""__,.~~'___'_""_~""'.'_'~_""'___ """,_">><.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-~,,~,,,,,-,,,,,,,,_~,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~~,,,,_,,__,, '''_''><~='''''''' ==_.,......~":;:.l P"'>IIt~~t.;:~~ ~';:.,~~ ~ ~ ~ N ~Id, 33',"1',";;1VI[; saJ!HO peolj eqned -,,, ! : J : ! :;i . , l'f ! If , I 'II, . 'I ; , II-l' I I J I 1 Ill. 1 ! j! i I i Iii II, III I I Ii'! J [I! 'I' II iI, III \Jill l I j j I! ml! ;1. ElGElElGElElBB00 . -) \ \ \ -~ \ . 1,\ '" ? '" , . \ . '" . \ ~_....""--.....-;.;~:-..-~.."''''''''''.''''~~.''''''*.....~--......_'' . --"""""","''''''~"'""''"'' l~~~""lIl:If'-.J~ --~>>~-->-->-,,>-,,~-",->>-....~._~-,-,>.., saJ!lJ~I!~~ I!lJ~I!E::':__=~' , '-;;;':;;;:~;,_..",__~'::i ..- 'J"P'I!~"o<'~r ~ljI3:J1;IG3VIL___,___ " ... 'I' , .... ' <l: A ! 1 . ~ _ _ . , , , 'J 1 11 , J. J I ~ i " ; Hi! I I I 1 1 lJ. I ' ' I It! ~ i 1 1 II, II f!1, 1 (I' ~I ~I ill, 1 Iii IJ~li, . , , , II! 1111 ~ III j II I~EJ.i& 5GBBGBElEl / J . . , I , II ! I t ~ I. · jl 1 1 ! ~ III II ! c . ~ g ~ ~ , . ., "' ., U .I . ') \ \ \ fiJ ,x: / / x , ,/, ' ,/\,\; / \. \\, \, \,\: <> \\ \ ,-,."...,...........,~.......~........".,."...........-.._" ..........-,.....,-;;";;::;1 =...,"'-"'--="~ l6Sl6.\:,O:;=lIl>lJd.lOW ""'-~-"''''"'~'' P=lI"'l""dP --... ~~::::;:;;;-.__~r.=..~"~._~_.._~~_'~~_.,-. ~JnP~I!~~'O < 'O~b D1JI03\i1: saJ!lJO PllOll m .."" -~ -~ , , I . t , I' !d ~ I J l ., . Ui! j I j 1 'II. j- I III f ! 'i i i I j , I I f !ll 1 In 1 j j 1 I ! III 11111 ~ III j j JIll MU~ ' ~~BBBBB '::8~~ / .) \ "'''-'",;~='~::. '. .... "j' , .... - <( ! 111 . , , 1 , , ! i ! i , . , , 0: . '0; ,- " J . '\ Q . . . . a'np.j'~"D<<O'P! D1JI03V!1 """""~"'''''''''''''_'_~_"'''_''''''''_;~'''"~~'_'~'_~'<_~'~''''''''''''''''''~___''''""_ ~__;"'''''__~'''''''_'-'''''''R__-'-' .....~,.,"'m""',..,'~...".."..~~_...,~_"'W,"...."',,~"'_~_....,, ""."-"""._,,,,",,,," '~".1F'~_.......~~;: P""lJt~~:.'~~o~~~~;,";':~ .... . I <t saJ!lJO p-eOl:l -eqn-ed . , , I I j , 1 I! t '>1'" -t if I I I" 1 " III ! i lH f .:t 888 i , I t h " . I ; · I h ~~ u ~ + ~ ,Ii hWl ~ ;~f:f , j, lr, ,",'t '" o 1 , I I , h t ":;-;,"- ! , . ! h l~ H ..;. +"f J~ ]1 h I. . . . h . . .., 0' .g~ ., ~j ~ a -'j'jj"-- ::::;i:~~:::::; f "'---",' ! i I ,. . llll I I! !J I - !df n 1{ If It I~ ~ .1 H ullfdd; iElBB0BB@ ~ o q .g~ ., ~j ~ o Z . , .3 : . w ~ . o :€ l! "ii ~ ,. ~ , .......,". _m', '''~~....,..'''...,_..U. __"_..____.-..-"'_,,~"""".....""-_""....._."',..,.,....=~.~.__....______.._~..~...~.._p,~~~_~...____._..."'............,_"..~'".....__~,._~.."""'_"...~,_._....,, '._""""""'''0 l6S<:6'fWo~I":l"I":,,,u"1 P""ll"I""dPU<P""~",,,,d...W .... ..; de:( , , I 1 1 I ., , j, !I! I 1 1(1" 1-' I I ! Jill! I ~ jj J I .;;. ElBElEJ I! I....) !:\~ \~ 0 '-r---,..>>--_.-t i,ii r--n- ~r_n_. n; e! "" , 8 ] ~ " <.0 ~~ ~ 0 '>{-.-----:;=;;------. i,ii '~j iDJ . o ] ~ j!~-...r--t !i saJ!lJO peoH eqned ~, 1 ~ n ), .". o 0' 0" '0' ~!! ~l ] I i , !. 'I', I I' III _ l,t "'I"lfl' ~ !Hlllllllh H i!.GBBeJElElB f I , , ! ~~ .. 1. j ~~ H ;;;. '}. - - ----T>i- . J, it ~" .,.,. 1 . , , " . > , w ~ . , :~ ~ 'ii ~ ~ j . i It '" o 0' .2~ e~ ". ~ . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Rood Offices\STAFFREPORT.doc 7 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0349, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 18,237 SQUARE FEET ON 2.5 ACRES. BUILDING "A" IS 6,323 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING "B" IS 11,908 SQUARE FEET LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD, AN ESTIMATED 312 FEET WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA AND PAUBA ROAD IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA (ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 945-110- 002). WHEREAS, Matthew Fagan, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0476 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA04- 0476; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 176.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan forTemecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Neighborhood Commercial (NC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, convenience services, and office, as typical uses in the Neighborhood Commercial designation. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that the proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed retail/office buildings have been designed to be compatible with the surrounding buildings currently located adjacent to the site. In addition, the proposal is consistent with the development regulations of the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning district. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public . health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of T emecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation; architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study has been prepared and indicates that the project will not have a potential for significant environmental impacts. Based on the following Initial Study, staff recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct a 18,237 square foot retail/office building as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of March 2005. . David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road,Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) i, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of T emecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of March 2005, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSiONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Qffices\Reso and COA's.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 4 . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA04-0476 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct two office/retail buildings totaling 18,237 square feet on 2.5 acres. Building A is 6,323 square feet and Building B is 11,908 square feet. The project site is located on the south side of Pauba Road, an estimated 312 feet west of the intersection of Margarita and Pauba Road in the City of Temecula. (Assessor's Parcel Number 945-110-002) DIF Category: Office/Retail MSHCP Category: Office/Retail Assessor Parcel No.: 945-110-002 Approval Date: March 30, 2005 . Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval at this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officiais, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 5 fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the . City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Site Plan, Grading Plan, Building Elevations, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Planning Department, or as amended by the conditions herein. The Site Plan must meet the following criteria prior to development of the project: a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall not be placed in prominent locations visible to the public. This equipment shall be screened from view. b. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of the transformer and the double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. The Landscaping Plan shall be amended as follows: a. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. b. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long- term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program. 7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 6. 8. The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 6 . . . . . real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Main Body texture and color Finish & Color RCP precision concrete block in Yellow Gold, Mission, Buff, and Terracotta; Frazee paint: Greige, over stucco Standing seam metal roof, color: Slate Grey Galvanized metal finish: anodized aluminum Roof Overhangs/Accents 9. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department during plan check for review priorto installation. The installation of wall pack style light shall not be used along the street side elevation. 10. This approval does not include necessary permits required for future installation of electric co-generation equipment. Such equipment will require separate permit as necessary. Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided to the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 12. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 14. If at any time during excavation!construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. This condition shall be added as a note on the Grading Plans. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's,doc 7 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits . 15. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 16. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan for the employee area. This area shall include decorative fumiture to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 17. The applicant shall submit a detail of the proposed flag pole subject to the approval of the Planning Director. The height of the flag pole shall be consistent with the proposed architecture. 18. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 19. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches to be painted "Intemational Orange." 20. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattem with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 21. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. . 22. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially to the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. . R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 8 . Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits . . 23. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 24. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: . 25. "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000." 26. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 27. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 28. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 29. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 9 30. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. . 31. Coordinate Pauba Road improvements with City of Temecula Capital Improvement Project No. PWOO-09. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 32. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 33. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 34. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 35. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. . 36. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 37. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the tollowing agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District . R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 10 . . . c. Planning Department Department of Public Works d. 38. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 39. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 41. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 42. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402. e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. f. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. g. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. h. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 43. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Pauba Road (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc ". 44. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. . 45. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Sewer and domestic water systems. d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines. 46. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street c10su re and detou r or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 47. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Pauba Road. 48. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 49. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. . 50. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 51. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Departrnent of Public Works 52. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 53. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. . R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Qffices\Reso and COA's.doc 12 . BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 54. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 55. The City of T emecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 56. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 57. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 58. . 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. . 68. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998) Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Officcs\Reso and COA's.doc 13 69. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. . 70. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 71. Show all building setbacks. 72. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. S~~~ 7:00am.-~Wp.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions: 73. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 74. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. . 75. The Applicant shall corn ply with the Public Art Ordinance. 76. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 77. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force atthe time of building plan submittal. 78. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1875 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2725 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 14 . . . 79. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 80. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 81. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 82. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 83. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC see 902) 84. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 85. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 86. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 87. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 88. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc IS 89. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 90. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 91. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval priorto installation. (CFC Article 10) 92. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4) 93. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 94. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 95. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 96. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 97. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 16 . . . . . . 98. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 99. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) OTHER AGENCIES 100. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Metropolitan Water District letter dated August 9, 2004, a copy of which is attached. 101. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's letter dated July 22, 2004, a copy of which is attached. 102. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho Water District letter dated August 3, 2004, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department Approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\Reso and COA's.doc 17 Executive Office . . MWD METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA F----..----.--~-~,~pR \rD)_~ U U S "~I fl, \~ ;; '.' \ .~1] 2004 'cJI \:;:'i \UU i ~~~---~-~-----~ MWD San Diego Pipelines Nos. 1,2 Sta. 1355+00 to 1359+00 MWD San Diego Pipelines No.3 Sta. 1476+00 to 1480+00 Substr. Job No. 2028-04-029 August 9,2004 Ms. Christine Clary City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dear Ms. Clary: Pauba Road Offices Proiect Thank you for your transmittal and a preliminary site plan for the proposed two- story office and retail building development on the south side ofPauba Road west of Margarita Road in the city ofTemecula. As shown on the enclosed map, our 54- and 60-inch-inside-diameter San Diego Pipelines Nos. 1 and 2 and our 75-inch-inside-diameter San Diego No.3 pipelines are located in the vicinity of the proposed project, but are outside the project limits as indicated on the site plan. We are transmitting a copy of our "Guidelines for Development in the Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and/or Easements of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California" and prints of our Drawings B-13768 through B-13770, B-69698 and B-69699 and Right-of-Way Map SDA-P-4 (Sheet 10f2) and SDN-23 (Sheet 4 on). We request that our facilities and right-of-way be fully shown and identified as Metropolitan's on any pertinent project plans and that prints of these plans be submitted for our review and written approval as they pertain to our facilities. 700 N.Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. Mailing Address: Box 54153, Los Angeles. California 90054.0153. Telephone (213) 217.6000 THE METROPOLITAN WATER OIS7llICT OF SOUTIIERN CAliFORNIA . Ms. Christine Clary Page 2 August 9, 2004 We request that a stipulation be added to any applicable plans and specifications to notify Mr. John Martinez of our Water System Operations Group, telephone (909) 776-2616 at least two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of our facilities. For any further correspondence with Metropolitan relating to this project, please make reference to the Substructures Job Number located in the upper right-hand comer of this letter. Should you require any additional information, please contact Ms. Kathy Meyer at (213) 217-7663. Very truly yours, 6WJcu-.- -m. ~ . Susan M. Walters Senior Engineering Technician Substructures Team SMW/KMfly DOC 2028-04-029 Enclosures (9) . o CCJNTY OF RIVERSIDE . HEAL..-I SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH July 22, 2004 ~~)~'~~': " ~~-'--,~' ~~II t;-i -~ iill li'\ iili [. n! '_"', ! rJ 1'1 I'll: C,.A ili LLJ';'o) ~ !!j l ,Sy __n__n~ ~C~V~-~--:-i=-nr:-,'i"l" ii'/ . ~. :; \,J., \! :i JUL i~ '/ I ' lU~_; , i1 ~.__.cc=:::.==~d City of Temecula Planning Depaltment P.O. Box 9033 Temeeula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Christine Clary RE: Plot Plan No. PA04-0476 Dear Ms. Clary: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0476 to construct a 18,237 sq. ft. office building and has no objections. Water and sewer services should be available in this area. 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering distJ1cts. . Sincerely, Sam Martinez, Supervising E' ental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not eovered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. . @ RwIw Water Board of Directors John E. Hoagland President Csaba F. Ko Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake Lisa D. Herman Michael R. McMillan Officers' Brian J. Brady Genera! Manager Phillip L. Forbes Director of Finance-Treasurer E.P. ''Bob" Lemons Director of Engineering Perry R. Louck Controller Linda M. Fregoso DistrictSecretary/Administralive Services Manager C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel August 3, 2u04 Christine Clary, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ~-'':::~ \\ :,') '\ \1\-,'\ ,-"-"""--"-i'-,l r-, \i\\\ ~ \11\ A qr: (\ 0 2004 \,\) !,11, Hu~,l u _ i........-'j I \ -J I\i\; \UU \"iV ___'--;c"-,,. '-~~.~:=--~,--_...,,_.'"... SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY; P AUBA ROAD OFFICES PARCEL NO.2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8455 APN 945-110-002; PA04-0476 [MATTHEW FAGAN] Dear Ms. Clary: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium development, with individual building owners and an owners' association maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection, and landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to this agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each condominium unit. -h. The project should also be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape V irrigation. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT /Y);IJJt-" r ~i~ael G. Meyerpe .E. Development Engineering Manager 04\MM:atl 03\FCF c: Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 INITIAL STUDY R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\STAFF REPORT-doc 8 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Pro'ect Title Lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Pro'ect S onsor's Name and Address General Plan Desi nation Zonin Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Other public agencies whose approval is re uired . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc Environmental Checklist Pauba Road Offices, PA 04-0476 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Christine Damko, Assistant Planner 951 694-6400 Southside of Pauba Road, an estimated 312 feet west of the intersection of Margarita and Pauba Road in the City of Temecula. Assessor's Parcel Number 945-110-002 Matthew Fa an, 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera, Temecula, CA 92591 Nei hborhood Commercial NC Nei hborhood Commercial NC PA04-0476 is a request for a Development Plan to construct two office/retail buildings totaling 18, 237 square feet on 2.5 acres. Buildin A is 6,323 s uare feet. Buildin B is 11,908 s uare feet. North: Public Park and Recreation (vacant) East: Neighborhood Commercial (existing shopping center) South: Low Density Residential (existing single family residences) West: Low Densit Residential vacant None Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics A riculture Resources Air Qualit Biolo ical Resources Cultural Resources Geolo and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials H drolo and Water Qualit Land Use and Plannin Mineral Resources Noise Po ulation and Housin Public Services Recreation Trans ortation/Traffic Utilities and Service S stems Mandator Findin s of Si nificance None Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal ze onl the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired. Si~V\!\A h1:1M.V }yJJ\Y\ \? JJ' SI n ure 7u ttulv Date --- .-- !:J I 24V) I Christine Damko, Assistant Planner Printed name City of Temecula For . RID P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Officesllnitial Study.doc 2 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a. b. Issues and Su ortin lnformation:Sources Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic hi hwa ? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ualit of the site and its surroundin s? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Significant 1m act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation hlcor 'orated No 1m act X X :LessThari Significant li'n act c. X d. X Comments: 1. a.-b: No Impact The proposed project is not located on or near a scenic vista; therefore, there will not be an adverse impact on a scenic vista. The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is a 2.5 acre site, and is currently vacant with no structures or rock outcroppings on the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including rock outcroppings or historic buildings. Due to the fact that the project site is vacant with no scenic vistas or resources, the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. .. c. - d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The surrounding area consists of an existing commercial shopping center to the east, existing single family homes to the south and west, and an existing church to the south west. To the north of the site is a sports park. Less than one mile west of the subject property is an existing fire station and site for a proposed City library. Less than one mile north east of the subject property is Temecula Valley High School. The homeowners to the south of the subject properly are located at a higher elevation than the proposed development, and will therefore be able to see the development. A line of site exhibit was prepared by HLC Engineering on February 1, 2005 which concentrated on this area. The line of site shows that the residents directly south of the proposed project will be able to overlook the top of the proposed two story building due to the sloping topography. The residents to the south east will have a partial view of the proposed development, since steep topography on site will help to screen the building. In addition, the building will be built close to Pauba Road while the parking lot will be located behind the building. Due to the steep sloping topography the project has left more than 160 feet of open space between the parking lot and the rear property line to add as an additional buffer and to preserve the drainage channel. The proposed project site is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. The proposed project will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with commerCial office/retail development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Riverside County Mount Palomar Ordinance 655. Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: R:ID P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offieesllnitial Study.doe 3 a. b. c. Issues and Su ortin "Iriforma1ionSources Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-a ricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-a ricultural use? Comments: , :(=lotel)tiany . Signific'ant 1m aCt .'Pol~~liaUy, siQ~ificcmtUn\e~~' . _ :Mitigil:tion' .:< . -Inco' orated No 'Im'.:ici X Less-Hhah'-; Signific~nt-' - 1ri1'acr<< X X 2. a.-c.: No Impact: According to Figure 5.2-1 labeled "Agricultural Resources" in the Agricultural Resources portion of the General Plan; the project site is not identified as land that is currently in agricultural production, nor in the past has the site have been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. .Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Contlict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air ualit Ian? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existin or ro'ected air ualit violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of eo Ie? Comments: ,- ;'~oteni'iaily Signilic~nt . >Im act Pbtenti~_"y Significant Unless Mitigation 'Ineor orated .-.No ;Im' act ; LessTnan ,; Significant 1m act X X X X X 3. a., b.: Potentially significant impact: The project site is comprised of 2.54 acres and the proposed development includes two office/retail commercial buildings consistent with the zoning and general plan designations for the site. The General Plan EIR assumed that development would occur on the subject sit. consistent with the General Plan land use designation of NC (Neighborhood Commercial), which i implemented through the NC zoning designation. The General Plan envisioned target floor area ratios (FAR's) for these designations and the General Plan EIR analyzed the potential impacts from potential uses in the NC R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Oftices\lnitial Study.doc 4 zone. The proposed project, while not specifically analyzed, was anticipated as part of the Commercial Developments for the City. In addition, the City of Temecula General Plan EIR adopted a Statement of _erriding Considerations in the 1993 plan, recognizing that the City could not attain Federal Standards for air .ality. The City of Temecula is currently in the process of completing a comprehensive update to the 1993 General Plan. The current Draft EIR fro the General Plan update also acknowledges that the City will not meet the AQMD standards and intends to adopt a Statement of Overriding Conditions for Air Quality sometime in the second quarter of 2005. The proposed project will not significantly violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The proposed project will create typical emissions and dust associated with commercial construction; however, standard Conditions of Approval will be part of this project approval that will reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. Earthwork quantities include an estimated 11,900 cubic yards of import to be transported on existing paved City streets. 3. C.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The proposed project will emit typical emissions and dust associated with commercial construction, which were anticipated in the General Plan EIR; therefore, this is not considered a significant impact. In addition, Temecula has adopted a Trip Reduction Ordinance, pursuant to requirements of the State Health and Safety Code. The Ordinance enables the City to receive revenues from vehicle registration fees to administer air pollution reduction programs. The main City strategies to reduce automobile emissions are continued enforcement form the Trip Reduction Ordinance and development of additional local employment opportunities. The City will also continue to pursue development of a local public transit program. No impact is anticipated as a.result of the proposed project. 3. d-e.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures:: There are sensitive receptors within the acinity of the project. A City library will soon be constructed less than one half mile west of the site on Pauba ~ad. Temecula Valley High School is located less than one half mile north east of the project site, in addition to two child care centers located near the High School and near the proposed Library site. The development of the project for commercial office/retail buildings will create minor pollutants during the grading and construction phase of the project emanating from fugitive dust and small quantities of construction equipment pollutants. Below lists Conditions of Approval that will be implemented with the project approval: a. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall verify that all earth moving and large equipment are properly tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In addition, alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used where feasible. Construction equipment should be selected considering emission factors and energy efficiency. b. Electrical and/or diesel-powered equipment should be utilized in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines. c. During construction and grading phases, the project site shall be watered down in the morning before grading and/or construction begins and in the evening once construction and/or grading is complete for the day. The project site shall be watered down no less than 3 times (not including the morning and evening water-down) during construction and/or grading activities to reduce dust. d. All fill being transported to and/or from the site shall be covered and the wheels and lower portion of transport trucks shall be sprayed with water to reduce/eliminate soil from the trucks before they leave the construction area. . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 5 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? a. b. c. d. e. f. Issuesand'Su ortin Information5ources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru tion, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? Conilict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Comments: "Potentially Significant 1m act. ,,', , . _ Potentially y Signific;ant ..IJntess.. '. .Mitigation . 1l1cor orated' Less'Than Significant liii- ad X No ,<lin act X X X X X 4. a-I.: Less than Significant Impact: The 2.5 acre property is characterized by rolling hills with a low, relatively flat valley that traverses the site from north to south. The site is characterized by upland areas that have been graded or disced during the construction of the adjacent commercial development, and a relatively wide-shallow water course traveling the western edge of the parcels of the site from north to south. This channel supports riparian vegetation in the eastern quarter of the channel. Wetlands occur along the ordinary flow line of the channel. The soils exhibited long duration of saturation during the growing season. In some areas towards the east of the property, the soils were still saturated in July of 2004. The channel topography is conductive to a riverine hydrological regime. This channel vegetation is dominated by riparian tree species such as willow and cottonwood. The channel transitions to the north into a more herbaceaous dominated channel with species such as cattails, salt grass, bermuda grass, and rhumex crispis. The channel falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; the CDFG under Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code; and the State Regional Water Quality Control Board under 401 of the Clean Water Act, as well as a Water of the State under Porter-Calogne Act. The proposed project avoids the channel. Therefore, permits from the above referenced agencies are not warranted. Should th. project design change, then the need for permits would need to be re-evaluated. In addition, there will be a 2: slope from the top of the building pads to the bottom of the slope where riparian habitat occurs. The bottom slope will be set back from the limits of the riparian vegetation by 10 to 60 feet. Tom Dodson & Associates R\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 6 prepared a general biological survey labeled, "General Biological Survey, Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation for APN # 945-110-002 and # 945-110-003 City of T emecula, Southwestem averside County" dated July 2004. The result of the biological survey is that the majority of the site is .,turbed. The disturbed areas are located on the northem portion of the property is characterized by upland non-native weedy species such as tumble weeds and brome grasses. Habitat Conservation fees will be required as a standard condition of approval to offset the effect of cumulative impacts to the species from urbanization occurring throughout westem Riverside County. The project site is a part of the Westem Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which was adopted by City Council on January 13, 2004, and became effective March 12, 2004. The site is not designated as a potential or existing conservation area, nor is it within a criteria cell. The plan requires that a habitat assessment be conducted for the burrowing owl on this parcel. The biologist also walked the site for this species. No burrowing owls or sign of any kind were found on the property or in the zone of influence transects. All natural (berms, dirt and grub piles, etc.) and artificial substrates (culverts on adjacent parcels) were checked for signs of burrowing owl, but no pellets, whitewash or burrows were found. The project site has previously been graded, and has also been grubbed and disturbed for many years in order to comply with the City's weed abatement ordinance (Ord 8.16). There are some grasses on the project site, however they are not considered sensitive habitat, nor is the site a part of a wildlife corridor. Standard Conditions of Approval will reduce the impacts to a level that is not significant. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: c. Issues'aridSiJ"' ortiri"lnforma'tionSblirees; , Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeolo ical resource ursuant to Section 15064.5? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or uni ue eolo ic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? "P6t~rltially/): , 's,ignifiei:int, >'- '; - )llm'act/.:./- _"Poten_tiaJly ~jgJ\ifica~~tLihl,~SS':" , .,':-Mit,ig,a~;io'ri_',.>' ,::tlncor orafed:y.:~J x b. x x d. x Comments: 5. a-d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula General Plan identifies the project site as a sensitive archaeological resource area and area of high paleontological sensitivity (Figure 5-6 and 5-7, respectively). CRM Tech submitted a "Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report"(dated January 6, 2005) which reviewed and summarized previous cultural resources investigations for the project area. According to records on file at the Eastem Information Center, the project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources prior to this study, and no cultural resources had been recorded on or adjacent to the property. Outside the project boundaries but within a one-mile radius, EIC records show 14 previous cultural resource studies covering various tracts of land and linear features. These and other similar studies resulted in the identification of three archaeological isolates. All three were prehistoric-i.e., Native American- in nature, consisting primarily of chipped or ground stone. None of these previously recorded isolates was located in the immediate vicinity of the project area, and thus none of them requires further consideration during this study. The intensive-level field survey produced no evidence of potential cultural resources on this site. The entire _roject area was closely inspected for any evidence of human activities dating to the prehistoric or historic eriods, but none was found. No buildings, Structures, objects, sites, features, or artifacts more than 50 years f age were encountered during the field survey. Based on the above information, identification and evaluation of potential 'historical resources' within the project area have been completed through the study, and no further impacts are anticipated. In order to ensure no significant impacts will result with the development of the project R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offiees\ln;l;al Study.doc 7 a. b. c. d. e. Comments: i. Issues anct'Su' ortin 'Informatio'n Sources . Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvin : Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geolo S ecial Publication 42. Stron seismic round shakin ? Seismic-related round failure, includin Ii uefaction? Landslides? Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readin ,subsidence, Ii uefaction or colla se? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or ro ert ? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? . Potentially 'Significant "Ilii aCt". ','p'bt~iltially" . Significan~, Unless , , M'i1igalion lnco orated No 1m act X LessThan S-igniflcant Imac! X ii. iii. iv. X X X X X X X 6. a. i, ii, iii: No Impact: According to Figure 7-1 and Figure 7-2 in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the proposed project is not located within a potential area for liquefaction. In addition, the project is not located within an Alquist-Priolo special studies zone. However, the Temecula General Plan Study Area is located in Groundshaking Zone II. Groundshaking Zone II is expected to vary from moderate to intense in the event of an earthquake, depending on the composition of underlying geologic formations, the earthquake's epicenter, and the order of magnitude of the seismic event. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction, which will be consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Furthermore, the project will be conditioned to provide a soil report concurrent with the submittal of precise grading plans. The soil report will contain recommendations for compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. 6. iv., b, c.: Less than Significant Impact: The project will not result in substantial soil erosion.or the loss of topsoil. The project site is will be developed in accordance with City standards, including National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, which require the implementation of erosion control an_ best management practices (BMP's). The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula Gener Plan has not identified any landslides that have occurred in the area, potential landslide conditions exist i hillside areas in southwest Temecula where slopes are greater than 15%. The project is not located on a R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 8 geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. Less than significant tfpacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6. d, e.: No Impact: The project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. The project site will not utilize septic tanks. A public sewer system is available and approvals from the Department of Environmental Health for solid wastes and waste water will be required. The project will connect to the public sewer system. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: , .', _., ':Potentially:" . >:~oterit!?1.ly Sigqifi~ant Unless Less Than . Issues and;Sua'oortina Inforrriali6ri'SQurces . " .,.... Signi!j9an~ _ _ - 'f>JIitigation-' Significant No Jmoact:: :locor;::'oraled lriibact. . Imoact . a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e, For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workina in the proiect area? f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinq in the moiect area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 7. a.: Less Than Significant Impact The proposed project will use existing Pauba Road as the ingress and .gress point. The proposed project site will be designed to include trash enclosures and recycling bins. The proposed use of the site is commercial office and retail. The proposed commercial uses do not propose the use or manufacture of hazardous materials or produce hazardous wastes to comply with existing federal, R:\P P\2DD4\04.0476 pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 9 State, and County Regulations. Therefore, there will be no significant hazard to the public or the environment from the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. 7. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes to construct an 18, 237 square foot commercia. building. It is not anticipated that the project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The operation of construction equipment and machinery during the development of this site may emit some hazardous emissions and or handle some hazardous material. However, these emissions and material should be of limited quantities over a short duration of time. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 7. d.: No Impact: The project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not result in a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. e-f.: No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public or private airstrip according to Figure 5.9-4 in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal. 7. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. h.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. The location of the proposed proiect would not expose people or structu~es t~ a significant risk o. loss, injury or death Involving wildland fires. No Impact IS anticipated as a result of this proJect. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. b. c. d. ;f~;~~~~~i~j~S,~ x Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge re uirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which ermits have been ranted? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result x x x R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 10 in floodino on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capaCity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially deQrade water quality? X g. Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? . j. Inundation bv seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 8. a.: No Impact: The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) overlies two major aquifers, the Temecula and the Pauba, which have been subject to water supply planning since 1980. RCWD will service the proposed project. Development will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No impacts are enticiPated as a result of this project. 8. b,f.: No Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. To avoid groundwater depletion, a conjunctive use program has been negotiated among RCWD and other local water districts to recharge the Murrieta-Temecula groundwater basin and other ground water basins serving the City. A conjunctive program was developed to manage the basin, which refers to the planned use of groundwater in conjunction with service and/or imported water to optimize total water resources and improve water supply reliability. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters or aquifer volume. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8. c-d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation and/or flooding on-site or off-site. Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff that is created. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. .. e.: No Impact: The project will not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capaCity of xisting or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. To ensure that adequate flood control capaCity is available to support new development, all proposed projects within the Planning Area are reviewed by the Riverside County Flood Control District prior to the approval by R:IP P\2004104.0476 Pauba Road Officesllnitial Study.doc 11 the City of Temecula. The project will be conditioned and designed to accommodate the drainage created as a result of the subject site. In addition, the project will be conditioned and designed so that the drainage will not impact surrounding properties. Less tha~ significant impacts are anticipatedas a result of this project. . 8. g - h: No Impact: The proposed project Will not place development Within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as mapped on figure 7-3 in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. i.: No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. According to Figure 7-4 in the Public Safety Element of the General Plan, the project is not located with an area that is subject to dam inundation. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. j.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located near a coast line which would be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: '<f:'O!~Qt!~I[y;~: f ~;Sigliificant ",c; . .~. ~',..:lm"acf: "Rote~tiaUY,': _c"' Signific:cml',Unless:., ~ Mitigation'- - IncO orated \, . "",,', 'LesscThan > . -Significant Im'acE :No " 1m 'ael X X a. b. Issues anClSiJ ortinlnformationSources Ph sicall divide an established communit ? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X c. Comments: 9. a.-c: No Impact The project will not disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community. The project will not conflict with the applicable General Plan designation, environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning land use designation of Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Impacts from all General Plan land use designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR have been applied to this project where necessary. Furthermore, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are being given the opportunity to comment on the project, and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or policies. The project site is a part of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), which was adopted by City Council on January 13, 2004, and became effective March 12, 2004. Staff reviewed the project under the MSHCP regulations and found that no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues'and Su ortiil' :lnformation'Sources,,'~ a. Result in the loss of availabilit of a known mineral R:ID P\2004104-0476 pauba Road Offlcesllni!ial Study.doc f>9(enti,:ilJy ;Sig~ifjcai1t' v .,;;;,:dm act"; Pote~tially 'SigniJ!cant U,nl~ss Mitigation ,-:lnco orated 'No ~Im act X 12 resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral lan, s ecific Ian or other land use Ian? x Comments: 10. a.-b.: No Impact: Public resources Code 2763 requires that the City land use decision affecting areas with minerals of regional or statewide significance be consistent with mineral resources within the Study Area identified by the State Department of Mines and Geology as being of regional or statewide significance be consistent with mineral resource management policies in the General Plan. There are no mineral resources within the Study Area identified by the State Department of Mines and Geology as being of regional or statewide significance. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: f. lssuesaridSu 6riin -:informati6nSources, . Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other a encies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive roundborne vibration or roundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro' ect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? "< W6\~~tia!ht_ ::_ _?i~njIic_ant <<::<dm'act':";" Po.tfmtially; S"ignificantUnless' ~ ,,'y1it.iQ'fition - ", <.0dncor orated'. . . :: -'LessiThan Significant :',,:'Im-act X , No ..Im act a. b. X X d. X e. X X Comments: 11, a.-d..: Less Than Significant Impact: The site is currently vacant and development of the land will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long- term. However, noise levels will be required to be within established noise level standards, According to Figure 5.10-3 labeled "2025 Noise Contours" in the Noise Element of the General Plan, Pauba Road has an anticipated build out roadway noise contour of 60 CNEL. The future noise contours have been estimated based on information about existing and projected transportation activity. The future noise contour is .consistent with Table 5.10-4 labeled "Noise/Land Use Compatibility Matrix" in the Noise Element of the General Plan. This matrix states that land uses such as office buildings, business commercial, and professional offices can have a normally acceptable noise condition of up to 65 CNEL. No activities are anticipated within the proposed project that would expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne R:ID P\2004104-0476 Pauba Road Officesllni!ial Study,doc 13 vibration or groundborne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating from the vacant land. However, those noises are not anticipated to create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The project may result i. temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery i capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However, noise from construction of the project will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. in industrial areas. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 11.e-f: No Impact: This project is not within two miles of a public airport or public or private use airport. According to Figure 5.10-4 of the French Valley Airport Future Noise Contours in the Noise Element of the General Plan, the project is not located in the noise impact area for the French Valley Airport. In addition, the project is not located in the French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zone according to Figure 5.9-3 in the Land Use and Planning Element of the General Plan. Therefore, people working in the project area will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport and no impacts will result from this project. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. b. c. Potentially Signi1icafrt.Uhless Mitigation Inca orated" }:, :-~_~6~ent(~ny Signifki;t'nt - "Am act ,LessThilJlc; Significant': 1m acL; X No . 1m act Issues "and Su6rtin ,Infdmlalion So'urces-. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? X X Comments: 12. a.: Less than Significant Impact: The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and zoning designations of Neighborhood Commercial (NC) . The proposed project will not produce residential units, but may indirectly increase growth due to future employees of the buildings. However, the proiect will not induce substantial growth beyond what is projected in the City's General Plan. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 12. b-c.: No Impact: The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is currently vacant. Therefore, the project will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing due to displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues'and Su' ortin' 'lnformation'Sources Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which .could cause si nificant environmental im acts, in order to R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc Potentially Sigriificant Jill 'act' . Poteiitially Significant Unless Mitigation lncor orated No '1m act Less Than Significant .Im act X a. 14 maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire rotection? Police rotection? Schools? Parks? Other ublic facilities? x X x x X Comments: 13. a, b, d, e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The development of the site will incrementally increase the need for these services. However, the project will contribute its fair share through the City's Development Impact Fees to the maintenance or provision of services from these entities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 13. c.: No Impact: The project itself is not creating residential use and therefore will have no impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. Development of the parcels within the project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees at the time the parcels are developed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14. RECREATION. a. b. X :':;;FP9!~'Htia!IYi:;; :: Signifi9ant ~Ullltis~ :" Mitigatio'n' "nco' 'orated,'. Issues'andSu ortln ;nfo~~~tjon s~Lrr~es Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilit would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 14. a-b.: No Impact: The project will have no impact on the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities, or affect existing recreational opportunities. The project proposes a commercial use and is not adding additional residential units. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. TRANSPORTATIONrrRAFFIC. Would the project: PCi,tentiauy":>" Signlfic',lnt Unless < _Mi~igatj6n' ._ lncor orated - -,; :>_~~s;s':tH~ri~-- e Significant :; No . - . ; 1m' 'aeL. _; ::Im act- " X . . . . -Issues ~hd Su artin infb~atjon's6u;ces', . Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capaCity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle tri s, the volume to ca aCit .".- . ,f-" :;-,-;~P6tkhti~IIY-' " SiQni~ca_nt ,,' 3hH acf:': R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 15 b. x x x x c. x d. x e. f. g. Comments: 15. a.-b: Less Than Significant: The City traffic engineer has reviewed this project and has found there are less than significant impacts to require a traffic study. There will be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets once the proposed project is developed. Based on ITE generation rates for the proposed project the 24-hour two-way volume associated with the office portion of the project will result in 99 Average Daily Trips, with 12 trips entering during the AM peak and 11 trips exiting during the PM peak. Based on the proposed retail use with approximately 9,000 square feet of space, the trips will be higher. The proposed projected 24- hour two-way volume associated with the retail portion of the project will result in 399 Average Daily Trips, with o trips entering in the AM peak and 14 trips exiting during the PM peak. The City's Traffic Engineer has indicated that the project would have a less than significant impact to the existing road system because tha existing roadways have been developed consistent with the City's General Plan in anticipation of the area'. proposed industrial development. Due to the project's consistency with the General Plan, no further traffic studies were required for this project. The project will be required to contribute to the Traffic Signal and Street Improvement components of the Development Impact Fees prior to the issuance of any building permits. No significant impacts are anticipated. 15. c.: No Impact: Development of this property will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. This site is not within the French Valley Airport influence area. Therefore, less than impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 15. d.: No Impact: The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. e.: No Impact: The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to nearby uses. The project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access and will not interfere with access to nearby uses. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. f.: No Impact: The proposed project will meet commercial use parking requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the City of Temecula Development Code. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. g.: No Impact: The project will be required to be designed consistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Therefore, no impacts will result from this project. . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Offices\lnitial Study.doc 16 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. I. ''': ',.:'::) .1ssuesandSu ortin Inforrri'ation'SOUfOOS Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the a licable Re ional Water Qualit Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or ex anded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capaCity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capaCity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and re ulations related to solid waste? ,^ f.';'Poten~!all/;:!. <Pote'rit\aily":) :"$ignificAn~Unles's;: >Le~SEThan:,' }Significanf''' <'-;_tv1it,igati~n"; ~::'Signjficfint "No ,'Im'act' -Inco orated " --. "liTi' act 'IIn ad X X X X X X X Comments: 16. a. b. e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities onsite. The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD) are addressing the flood control within Temecula through an improvement project in process through a contract with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE). To ensure that adequate flood control capacity is available to support new development, all proposed development projects are required to provide on-site drainage connecting to the City's drainage system and to pay the area drainage fee of $2,291 per acre of development. Drainage fee revenues from the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan are used to support capacity expansion within the local storm drain system. In addition, all proposed development projects are reviewed by the RCFCWCD. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD ~ave indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR _rther states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. In addition, the project will be conditioned to use recycled water for RID P\2004104-0476 Pauba Road Officesllnitial Study.doc 17 landscape irrigation. There will also be a condition of approval for the owner of the property to include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for on-site water facilities if the project becomes a commercial condominium with individual building owners. In addition to this condition of approval, the RCWa would require individual water meters for each condominium unit. . 16. f. g.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. b. c. ;;Pot€lntiaUy":,' . Significant tJ,hl~s,s ~,^. '"Mitigation_~ ,;' ", "Inca - orated ~ :_~)::~~~\Tha~<,:i ",,,Sign,ire-ant:;:: '. ':No';.---,' ,1m act..,',:,' ilrl1 act- X Issues alldSu ortin -Information Sources Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histor or rehisto ? Does the project have irnpacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current roo ects, and the effects of robable future roo ects ? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directl or indirectl ? ,:rF6Ienti~n(, ,':; -~'oSigrjificfint- i ,:Im act -, ,oj X X Comments: 17. a.: Less than significant Impact: No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The 2.5 acre property is characterized by rolling hills with a low, relatively flat valley that traverses the site from north to south. The site is characterized by upland areas that have been graded or disced during the construction of the adjacent commercial development, and a relatively wide-shallow water course traveling the western edge of the parcels of the site from north to south. This channel supports riparian vegetation in the eastern quarter of the channel. Wetlands occur along the ordinary flow line of the channel. The soils exhibited long duration of saturation during the growing season. In some areas towards the east of the property, the soils were still saturated in July of 2004. The channel topography is conductive to a riverine hydrological regime. This channel vegetation is dominated by riparian tree species such as willow and cottonwood. The channel transitions to the north into a more herbaceaous dominated channel with species such as cattails, salt grass, bermuda grass, and rhumex crisp is. The channel falls under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act; the CDFG under Section 1600 of the Fish and Game Code; and the State Regional Water Quality Control Board under 401 of the Clean Water Act, as well as a Water of the State under Porter-Calogne Act. The proposed project avoids the channel. Therefore, permits from the above referenced agencies are not warranted. Should the project design change, then the need for permits would need to be re-evaluated. In addition, there will be a2:1 slope from the top of the building pa_ to the bottom of the slope where riparian habitat occurs. The bottom slope will be set back from the limits the riparian vegetation by 10 to 60 feet. Tom Dodson & Associates prepared a general biological surve labeled, "General Biological Survey, Burrowing Owl Habitat Assessment, Jurisdictional Delineation for APN # R:ID P\2004104-0476 Pauba Road OHicesllnilial Study.doc 18 945-110-002 and # 945-110-003 City of T emecula, Southwestern Riverside County" dated July 2004. The result of the biological survey is that the majority of the site is disturbed. The disturbed areas are located on .e northern portion of the property is characterized by upland non-native weedy species such as tumble eeds and brome grasses. Therefore, the project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. 17. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The individual effects from the project are less than significant. The project will not have a cumulative effect on the environment since the project site is a commercial area in an urban area, surrounded by development. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures in place, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, the cumulative impacts related to the future development will not have a significant impact. 17. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The commercial project will be designed and developed consistent with Development Code, and the General Plan. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program ErR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. Comments: 18.a. The City's General Plan, Final Environment Impact Report, Draft Comprehensive General Plan, and Draft EIR were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 43200 Business Park Drive. Previously prepared historical/archaeological studies were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study. These documents are on file with the Eastern Information Center at University of California, Riverside. 18.b. Not applicable. 18. c. This Initial Study did not identify any "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated", therefore there are no mitigation measures for this project. . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Officesllnijial Study.doc 19 SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. . 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. Historical/Archaeological Resources Review prepared by CRM Tech, dated January 6, 2005. 4. MSHCP Consistency Findings prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates, dated February 1,2005 5. Line of Sight exhibits prepared by HLC Engineering, dated February 1, 2005 6. General Biological Survey, Burrowing Owl Assessment, and Jurisdiction Delineation prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates, dated July 2004 . . R:\D P\2004\04-0476 Pauba Road Oftices\lnitial Study.doc 20 . ITEM #4 . . . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 30, 2005 Matthew D. Peters, AICP Title: Associate Planner Application Type: Development Plan File Number PA03-0728 Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) A Development Plan to construct seventeen (17) office buildings totaling 54,093 square feet on a 4.71 acre vacant site in the Light Industrial (L1) zone, located on the west side of Business Park Drive between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road (APN 921-020-068). [8J Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial [8J Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFFREPORT.doc I PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: Lot 11 BPD LLC Completion Date: December 23, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: March 30, 2005 General Plan Designation: Business Park (BP) Zoning Designation: Light Industrial (L1) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant land totaling 205,544 square feet (4.71 acres) North: South: East: West: Vacant land Existing industrial buildings Existing industrial buildings Existing industrial buildings Lot Area: 205, 544 square feet or 4.71 acres Building Summary: 17 office buildings totaling 54,093 square feet . Building Height: 22 feet maximum (one story) Total Floor Area/Ratio 26.31% Landscape Area/Coverage 82,261 square feet (40%) Parking Required/Provided 181 spaces required /213 spaces provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~ 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concems have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. The Development Plan application for this project was submitted on December 23, 2003. The original application proposed a multi-use industrial complex consisting of four detached concrete tilt-up buildings. A DRC meeting was held on January 29, 2004. As a result of that meeting, the applicant changed direction and proposed multiple office buildings in the Light Industrial (L1) zone. A second DRC meeting was held July 15, 2004 to discuss the revised project. The meeting focused on the need to vary the building architecture of the office buildings, and meeting the Performance Standards outlined in the Development Code relative to plazas, courtyards, lunch areas for employees, outdoor seating and garden areas. . R:\D P\2003\03~0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 . . . Over the next several months, multiple revisions of the Site Plan, Grading Plan, and Landscape Plan were necessary to obtain the information required by the City to allow all departments to issue Conditions of Approval, and to achieve consistency between all three of the plans relative to drainage, cross sections, retaining walls, and pedestrian connections. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Planning Application No. PA03-0728 is a Development Plan to design and construct seventeen (17) office buildings totaling 54,093 square feet square on 4:71 acres in the Light Industrial (L1) zone, located on the west side of Business Park Drive between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road. The 17 office buildings consist of 13 single tenant, and 4 duplex tenant buildings. The buildings range in size from 2,138 square feet to 4,057 square feet, and are surrounded by common areas featuring outdoor seating/lunch areas and a water feature. The outdoor seating/lunch areas will be shaded by a trellis supported by posts covered with stone veneer that match the buildings. Each area will include concrete benches in tan earth tones. The water feature is conceptual, but will be approximately 16-feet wide and contain a fountain with cascading pools surrounded by a low seating wall. Final design of the water feature has been conditioned for review and approval by the Director of Planning (COA #22). The proposed buildings will contain smooth stucco painted a matte finish, and entrance columns covered with a stone veneer. Each building will incorporate a similar style and building materials, but a neutral color scheme will be slightly varied throughout the development to provide architectural interest. Buildings A, B, G, H, E, and F will be painted according to color scheme 1 where Balsam Bark serves as the main field color. Buildings D, 0, and P will be in color scheme 2 with Tony Taupe as the main field color. Buildings L, M, and N will be in color scheme 3 with Meadowlark as the main field color. The main entries have been accentuated with stone columns, and the buildings provide both parapet height variations and building articulations as required by the City's Design Guidelines. Vehicle access to the proposed site will be provided by two entries from Business Park Drive. The parking lot drive aisles will provide a clear path of travel around the buildings for adequate on-site circulation. Landscaping will be provided around the site ranging from 5 feet to 20 feet wide. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project conforms to all the development regulations of the Light Industrial (L1) zoning district. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and the 26.3 percent Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 40 percent for this zoning district. The proposed 26 percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40%. The building placement and circulation pattern for this site were directly influenced by a 55-foot drainage easement on the north side of the property and a fault line setback on the east side of the property along Business Park Drive. Both the easement and fault line setback limited building placement to the middle and back of the site, which further resulted in a modified loop drive that provides an efficient and adequate circulation for emergency and other vehicles. R:\D 1'\2003\03.0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitIPC STAFF REPORTduc 3 In addition to the onsite vehicle circulation, the project also encompasses a pedestrian . circulation system consisting of meandering sidewalks and seven outdoor seating/lunch areas for employees. The seating areas are strategically located throughout the site for easy access and use by employees. In the center of the project is a water feature with seating walls to provide visual interest and a distinctive character to the site. Architecture The proposed buildings are consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines and are compatible with other adjacent buildings within the business park. The proposed architecture includes smooth stucco finish with stone veneers. The colors for the buildings include natural grey, tan, brown, and ivory shades. The three color schemes are varied throughout the site to present each building with an individual style while maintaining a similar color palette throughout the entire development. The buildings include varied roof heights, breaks in the wall planes and an adequate number of glass windows, that when combined with landscaping, break up building mass from street view. The strategic placement of duplex buildings provides further variety and architectural interest throughout the site. In addition, the site features varied building setbacks along Business Park Drive, numerous common areas consisting of a columned trellis and a central water feature, which provides an additional common area and adds architectural interest from the street. Landscapinq The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The project proposes to landscape 82,261 square feet or 40 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum requirement of 20 percent in the LI (Light Industrial) zone. The . site includes multiple freestanding buildings that are clustered around a central courtyard that contains a water feature, and several smaller outdoor seating areas. In addition, the site includes extensive landscaping and pedestrian amenities that complement the architectural design of the buildings. Purple Leaf Plum and Fern Pine trees will accentuate the entryways, and Queen Palms will be located in front of most buildings and seating areas. Access and Circulation The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION I:8J 1. Pursuant to the findings of the County Geologist, and in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; the site is located on a parcel less than five acres in size within the City limits; no habitat occurs on the site for endangered, rare or threatened species; approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public . services. R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 . . . The eastern portion of this site contains an Alquist Priolo Fault Zone. These zones prohibit the location of structures for human occupancy within 50 feet of an active fault. However, the 50- foot setback requirement can be exempted upon a demonstration, through proper geologic investigation, that the zone is underlain by a fault that is inactive. This project proposes a 25- foot setback from the fault line. All of the required trenching and investigations were completed, and the County geologist has provided written confirmation to the City of Temecula approving the 25-foot setback and confirming that County Geologic Report No. 1375 satisfies the requirement for a fault rupture hazard report in accordance with the Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Ternecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and office, as typical uses in the Business Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Light Industrial zoning district. The proposed project has been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Additional Performance Standards for Office Buildings in the Light Industrial Zones of the Development Code and the City-Wide Design Guidelines. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 2. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFF REPORTdoc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 ,~ , ~ , ) ~.![-9tg-_ ~OJ""""'ld 16H6_1P'?"""'_l ,p-c...,~,,"o> 0<:,""""",,'_1 ""l)XlI:~W\",,a :nlQda tt.29' ~~ --- nlO1 .,",,_GlO:WOI ..I _UI6-_..U_ .e'.I~.. .ae8oJ..I ~'............,...."..,....",", ll' S~ mn Iln~~ k !,' . !'Il I!! 'I I ~ 8 I ~ ! I "II! ':;1 i \ 'M: 8 ,I I ~ 1,11'1 !Ji!,i! ; ~. "'I 1'1 I i'lll' " ~ . 'I!! I Ii ig. [ i I,ll "ill ~ I ! lli~!i~ ~ U~B~ ~ <{. NI !~~~~b"5 I ~ I~id g liilll ~ 'I i I ~i Il!!! ,1Il1l II I! i l!lll' II' &1'Hir dim ~Jii, ,II Ill! ~ 1111.1.11 ...." . r'I'lllml (j ,!. -' I" - , " I r :,_ ~ . I " i ~ .! ,hj I I ~ I 'ii HI ~1! Iii " ~ ~ eih!~I!!ql,'+!II" ~ t I iSl ndluB ,III MI hft ~ dllll ,IIID m~i ~i ! 2.~. . I I I !d!!11 .lll!t :lIlllllull/ --~- . r:~~;::~~:~_>~,->,~_ fn-vl ". !~ ri"' I.__~ 0v .! '--~ ..t-... i <::> I, i'> f1J in". L.l..: t C::',~: Ir";::;;-, "- <~-: _~ ;J 'i~ , , l , I " I' ' Il~ Ii .~,~ I II -UUU~)U~~~H)) :i ~ Im!llllm!!!!!! I II I - ! I iimmmmm ! II '.' at I ill! 1;111 h! II ImU . u I!( ,I' :11 II: Iii Ii! '" 'I I, , , IA ~ I ~ ! <l -' I L ~ I ill . l- I - I <l) ill > aLl Di i , I I~ I/~I If! I ~ ell ~ ro , , . I . !ilil !hll ~I ~Wli 'J!!, .!l1i If ill" I Ilill e "'I' ''I ,l,1 IIEi~ li!li f 1,~,1 'Ill; !lll' fl,,! r;r'l lllll! 1~1! I I , , i , I I , , I I , , i , I i , , I I , I I ; , ., I , , , , i I , I ., I , , ! 0 t. i () U. I , , , , I I I , i I I I I , I , i , I I I , , I z S j f2. ~gg: . ~i;: . .d~r... ' ~ ,,0 oSlf O'j..,,,, 0~8 '::1. . .--'0.;:\ <J: _'" ::> -u ~iJ~ ' p..,u~ u~.. - Q--. ~m- . d", ~;~ ... f : ~ i III i . ,;1 f ; l!il~dl~d ~ .. :f>~q'rll,- .. !l!!H:l~lEl I" '~ i!1I il" :i!! !"I' "( :lh 1M! " ! ~h. mil nl~nl!l I, Ii - " ~ s Ii h" ,ii' ~:I ~Iil' ill'! , I!. !~r: Ii I ! ii!~ ! l!'. ! .; 'II . i;l' i!!'I., I ~ i 9. B ! ! SI!:ii+ I ~ ill!i!i! ~=" . ,!111M Hh I; i ,~" II i ~*!I . f ~1'1 I ~ IIi! I " u~ , u _I ~, !;l I Ii ~~. ~ i~ ~ ~J ~ , ! '!I ll. ~lm i ! . 'I !hH Iii!'!! '>1" nl/! Iii' I" jI I'.., !~i!! I~ ~~ ~ Q " ~l m' ~ g - ~ I . o ; p.. " ! iil! .-,! l'li Iii; . I I ; I III J j ~~ I >i, l I ;. !: 1 I s ! f f J III ! ~! · I ! I I' .1 .~ ~ . '" . ~ : ~ ~ . . I' 'I" ':1 . " 'I" ,.", !' ,ill ,'1 II" · i:~ /'/'.111' ",ll I"" 'Wlil,! ~ !~llll:!.l! ~ ~~~l ~!~~. a: u lr 0 00 wfu 00 << : .. w. 009 .. o o ::::~ 2 9b ;::.- ~.b z N~ ~ ;;:;-:::- N rno :e ~ Zx ~ 0< ii:"" ~ W~i~ j!;! liil !l~, . , , , l ! , , , , , I , , , , I . . , '" 1m m 1 I , " , l j Ii .. . ! l 111< 111 . , , I ~ ~ ~ ;: ~ ~ ~ ? g :: ~ !i ~ . H ! " i ~ ~ ~ .~ ,i '" 5 ~ ~ 5 ~ , !, .. ~ N ~ ~ -.. -.,.,.,., .- !. 1 .. I II I .' ::1 'i! l!dl , I, I " lllll , II ; H~d 5i i ,I I 'I H ! ! I i ~ 11 Ii- i'l Illll ! .-1 ' , I .! I'I! j . I , P' I" i , HiI! ill lill , . Ii! ! ... , ~ . l ~ ~ .. .Q" ~~:~~ - ~;~~ ii ~~.,.~~.~i u: ~dtnh~ hod~~h ,$Cl)$ .. . " f ijJI ! ~~ SJ " .. -~ z W ~ > ...J a: a... Cl 0 z ~ F a: z ~ <( ...J Q.. a... (f) >- a: (f) ~ w z Z ~ (f) :J ;:) w r:D a: a... ~ ~ f- a ..J , " l' .1 i, Il j! : H H Ii II il ~i ~~ !< " , :.: ~ p ~ 5 , - w <> ~ a.. n:: ;;,,~ 6~~~i~ ~~:~~, <( !E~ 5 t~ a: <C.~ ~ ole" !!! ~i~ f! <( <.)5 2!~ :s ~~ ~ 5~ <<~ ~ 'I @ lmR ~~W~:~ONID 3l1NlAV HID HDlON 9l00L llf1lJlllH)W VW WVNlOIlM IllBOl HI ( I ~ .! Ii Ul. .m ~ VIN~OJIlV:> 'vlnJJl^ill 3~lND )IWd SS3NIsns SlN3\\mOO lNlV'IdOll^JO N~IS30 .Q-, , , , . i = F=j] . , , ... , I , I , I , I -+-----~- I , I , I , I , I ~ EJ EJ 1= __n nn n___._u__nun_nn o~,,-'J ...... ~. I I ~-- ~ EJ ....n - UuTnr I , < ... ...,....... - =-=-j 'I I" I <l I" J II ~ , :t u z 9 ;;:: . " , ~i ~ u z o ~ . . '" /" . (; 02 r-: '" 0 ~ "I r- !8~~ <( !~a...U::: ! :t . u z 9 5 m :t u z 9 ;;:: u z o ~ 5 o z o " ~ 5 u z 9 ;;:: u z 9 5 m o z o ~ u z 9 ;;:: '" u z 9 ;;:: u z o ~ o z o '" ~ . :t ..; z 9 5l ~ 0 0 ~ 5 ..; z 9 5 m ~ 0 0 ~ '" U z 9 ;;:: z ~ 0 0 . ~ . . . flBo-6l61Z:!1 zom YNOZl'W :JlVONID 3nN1\Y HlS9 I-U~ON 9l00L 1~f\D1IIH)W vrv ~VVNJOIlM msO! < ! II ill i!lj li ~g .~ .... ~ ; . ~~ ~ I , I , I , ---,----- , I , I , I VIN~OJnV) 'vln}JWJl l1l1ND )I'11Vd SS3NIsns SlNmmOO INJV'ldOlJA30 KJISJO c, z 9 0 :ii ~ ~ 0 0 '" 0 '-' z 9 :ii . ~ n ; ~ ; ~i 0 0 . '" 0 , '-' z 9 :ii '''"''.~.: ~ ~ 0 g ~D ~. ..... p~ ~- h~ '-' z 9 5 ~ . l I E3 E3 E3 l~ I I ~ '0.; I E3 r 1 v z ~ 15 o ~ o '-' z 9 :ii ~ 15 o ~ o '-' z 9 5 ~ z ~ 15 o ~ I'" i '. 'I,Jl . . - '-' z 9 5 ~ z o '" ~ o '-' z 9 5 ~ z o '" ~ o '-' z 9 :ii z o ~ '-' z 9 :ii 1 E3 E3 E3 E3 E3 I- << z o '" '" o '-' z 9 :ii << z o ~ o '-' z 9 :ii << z o ~ (; oz C"'.! '" 0 ~ "'j .,.- '8~~ -<( I",~~ I '-' z 9 :ii o z o '" ~ o '-' z 9 :ii " z o ~ o '-' z 9 :ii o z o ~ '-' z 9 :ii z o ~ o '-' z 9 :ii u z o ~ '" o '-' z 9 :ii u z o '" ~ am/'-Il91 ~OC59 VNOZID'1lVONID 3nNlflY lli59 I-U~ON 'JlDOl l!fU)lllfDW VW mN10IlM 1~90! Pi il!ll VIN~OJnY) 'VlO)lVill 3'lIlND )I~Vd SS3NISng SlNlV'ImOa INlVVd0l3A3a N~IS3a .~ ..... z ~ " <J Z z '3 z 5 <J " ~ z z '3 '3 " lii lii z 0 z .;, ~ :5 z ~ 0 1 ~ ~ 0 E3 :> il :il <J Z :> E3 :> '3 <J lii 1 <J Z z '3 " '3 E3 z lii 5 0 ~ ~ ----~ ~i z .;, -- z . 1 . i! 0 I ~ ", ~ 0 ~ 0 <J -.-1 '" z '3 ~ lii .1 ~ <J ~I <J z " z '3 '3 lii z 0 lii ~ ~ }JJ ~.l):, I...~ ~~J~) ~,U."I z z i! 0 ", ~ ~ 0 ~ :il ~, . ~ . i~ "~ ; , , " , .. .un ... _n_n_ --- .--"'] , 1 .. u__ --- _un_ , ~ Ii Ii Ii I ft~ ; lJ Ii j-Jt, ~ Ii , -Lil.q/~;UC>I5.1OC101 'J.,Jf.'iJ.oI<<<J~"""'" l!D " = = L. __nnnn____ .._.___n.._..________u_.... u ... .___oT I Ii, ! d,l~ ~ o ~ o z ~ g 18:s'2~ ! ll:ic..td 1 "'"l ...- <( . z " Z Z <J Z 9 z <J lii '3 z -< lii '3 5 z u ~ 0 Z 1= 0 ~ E3 ~ ", " i:; '" 0 E3 :> ~ " :> z " :> '3 z <J E3 lii '3 z lii '3 -< 5 is u ~ z z ", 0 :5 ~ ~ ~ i:; 0 ~ ~ " ~ " <J <J 9 z z 5 9 '3 w lii 5 -< ~ Z u, Z ; 0 z" ~ ", 0: ~ :- 1=' ~ <. ~ , ~l . o. ,d . . . """"6<l9'1 lOCSlI 'YNOZlW 1lYONID 3nN1\V Hl59 HllION 9WOl l~nDlllfDW vrv WVNlOllM H180~ ~ I ! 1,1 ;"1 WI VIN~OJIly) 'vln)lml 3~lND )I~Vd SS3NISnS SlNll^lmOO lNJI^IdOllAlO N~ISJO ,.~ ..... 111 ; . ~~:iE I ~ . !~ ..... ~~ ~ :: ~~ ...... ~, ~. non_n II -"-- ______noon __n_ u'-'--- UbJ i r " = " " -,~ '''-il ~ ! Ii ~bJ .' IB ,I " .... nmmmJ '_nnn_ II ____un__ ______nnn..._ I u '-' Z '" '3 , ~ Z ;;; ~ 0 g ~ ~ '-' Z '-' 9 z ~ '3 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ U '-' Z u '3 E3 u ~ z 15 ~ E3 '5 ~ 0 "" 0 2 ~ 0 " ~ " h, I t tli ! ill: ~ o ~ 02 "1: ::2 gj__ !8~~ -<C ltiQ..td ! ~ '-' z '3 ~ 0 Z 0 ~ u E3 '-' u z u '3 z ~ '3 ~ 0 Z 0 Z ~ 0 ~ "' t I I E3 I E3 E3 I E3 -n ~.< ~ '-' z '3 ~ u z o ~ u u z '3 ~ u Z~ 0: '" ~l lOrSlJ ~~W~ON3l'J ~nNlAY Hl59 HillON 9WOl J~()J}JlIfOW vrv WVNJOSM m80~ ~ 'I ( . ill!! VIN~OJllv) 'vln)lml l1l1ND ~~Yd SS3NISng SlNlI^In)oo INlWdOllMO N91S30 .. ,~ ..... ..... ~, .M .,. ..:;: .__""m"" "..1..1 ltJ r:: :; - 'Ll'.W.JOOlj;ldlO1S -Ll'.W.~~ <> - z ~~ ~~ U 9 z 5 ! 9 " ~ -< ! z~ , 3~ 0, FO Oil ~ . ~~ -. = ~l ~...*."""" I-ml------ '"'''''''' ~'::: I ., "' Ii, I II' , , ' , . " (; ~ o Z Lf). '" 0 ~ F 1-- 18'2:s~ <( l~o..i:d 1 . . . . . """6-((9 :1 WfSll VNOZlW '3lVOtHD 3fIN]AV H1S':l HUON lJrOO~ l~flDllIl{)lV VIV lVVN10IlM mao! Hi (,1 ~ ;;'1 h!~ VIN~OJI1v) 'vln)3W11 3~lND )I~V d SS3NISnS SlN3wmoo IN3WdOHA30 NJIS30 '. h: ,I jl .. II - ; ~~ ~. , I , I , I ----1----- , I , I Ol, " "- g- 5 ~i : ~ ~ o o ~ 1 . L!. ..J,:i:j if i : . ..... =.0 ..~ _mo_ i-j umnnnu..___ __._..........___m. liD ~ ,. , ~~ I i I I )j am....". II ~ !I~ " iI r II .unonn__ . -- __un_n___ ---- o VI ._ o Z '->J ~ 0 . ~ 1= ~ lo2'ilj I <( l~;;;," I 'i1N;;Odll'i? Vln?::J,{Jl I :~rC:llN~') )i~Vd SS:3NISng t I SlN:3v'mOQ IN:3HdOTlA:3Q N0IS:3Q ; i ; ! i ~O~GiL~~~~~~~~~19 3rN3.AV HHi/3 H1~ON 9WOI :l?JnD:llIH??J\;I \;11\;1 ?JWN:lOI:lM 1~:l90~ p! ~il'l ~I!l! r---., l< '" ~:;:;;: l~ . '" ~ 8 II '<! ~ t;j ~ ~~ t3l ol :j 8 u " ~ ~!Z ~ ~ :J: 11l :t "'l ~ ro ~ III it 0 --I it ~ ....I :I<t....l 0 ;! 8 ~;:! w Y! ~ ~ ~ If ~ ~~ o w ~ ., ll! ~ ll! ijl ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ fJ ~m ~li!! !Ill! I'~" .j 1'1 p. . IOAll ffip ~ J ~ ~ 8 a o ~ al ffi a~ ~ 1l:::I ~ ~~ UJ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~o ~ .,0 ~~ 1<' .. ~ 0 ~B w X ~ ~ N . " _::,:~ 2 ~ Vi, ,<!. crjt ~l r~ ~~. . ~ "-~ ~s >- ~ ~ ~ "" o is '" " es '" "" 8 "" t3; ol '. "' " , r a I':: . '" ~ ~ t;j ~:d ~~ ~!l il:P ~l ~l ~ ~ ~ '" @ "- ~ Vi ~G t3l o '" " ~ s ~ ~ ~ s I ~ "'~. :'C' toSl ~ ~ ! '" '" ~ 2 Cs $ 0 ..... "" t;j ..... ~'~ '" ~ ~ 0 0 d d ~ ~ ",! ",! Vi' Vi' . ~l ~l ~ ~ ! I , III !l! !II ; II a is ~ ..... l~ . d ~ [:q ~ "" ~' ~l I ."' N l ~ ~ , ~ . :-:" , , , ! (,~ l iJ- .' ~ . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 VICINITY MAP R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Rcsubmit\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ R\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\PC STAFF REPORT-doc 8 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0728, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT SEVENTEEN (17) OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 54,093 SQUARE FEET ON A 4.71 ACRE VACANT SITE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE BETWEEN RANCHO WAY AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (APN 921-020-068). WHEREAS, Scott Barone filed Planning Application No. PA03-0728 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application PA03- 0728; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. by reference. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 OF of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for T emecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consisfent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and office, as typical uses in the Business Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Light Industrial zoning district. The proposed project has been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:ID P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Reso & COAs.doc 1 The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of . T emecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Additional Performance Standards for Office Buildings in the Light Industrial Zones of the Development Code and the City- Wide Design Guidelines. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects, of the California Environmental Quality Act. No further environmental review is required for the proposed project. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct 17 office buildings totaling 54,093 square feet as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of March 2005. David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30'h day of March 2005, by the following vote of the Commission: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: AYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . R:IP P\2003\03.0728 spp LLCINov 12 ResubmillPratt Reso & COAs.doc 2 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDrafl Reso & COAs.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA03-0728 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct seventeen (17) office buildings totaling 54,093 square feet on a 4.71 acre vacant site in the Light Industrial Zone, located on the west side of Business Park Drive between Ranch Way and Rancho California Road (APN 921-020-068). DIF Category: TUMF Category: MSHCP Category: Business Park/Industrial Industrial Industrial Assessor Parcel No.'s: 921-020-068 Approval Date: March 30, 2005 Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval forthe project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any R:\D P\2003\03.0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Resa & COAs.doc 4 claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate . fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for theirliles. 6. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 7. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 8. All downspouts shall be internalized. 9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Site Plan, Grading Plan, Building Elevations, Floor Plans, Landscape Plan, and the Color and Material Board contained on file with the Planning Department, or as amended by the conditions herein. 10. The Landscaping Plan shall be amended as follows: a. All trees shown to be removed from the slope areas shall be replaced with minimum 24" box size trees. . b. All retaining walls shall be shown on the landscape plans and shall be appropriately screened with shrubs and wall vines. c. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 12. The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied . R:ID P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINav 12 ResubmitlDraft Resa & COAs.dac 5 . . . by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. COLOR SCHEDULE - SCHEME 1 Material Field Color Accent Color Accent Color Aluminum Mullion Color Stone Veneer Glazing Finish & Color Frazee #8224M-Balsom Bark Frazee #8694-Wood Cut Frazee #818IW-Maison Blanche Reynobond Anodic Bronze Eldorado - "Cascade Rustic Ledge W / Rubble" VS4-40 #2, v.." Bronze COLOR SCHEDULE - SCHEME 2 Material Field Color Accent Color Accent Color Aluminum Mullion Color Stone Veneer Glazing Finish & Color Sherwin Williams #7038-Tony Taupe Sherwin Williams #6079-Diverse Beige Frazee #8181W -Maison Blanche Reynobond Anodic Bronze Eldorado - "Cascade Rustic Ledge W / Rubble" VS4-20 #2, W' Bronze COLOR SCHEDULE - SCHEME 3 Material Field Color Accent Color Accent Color Aluminum Mullion Color Stone Veneer Glazing Finish & Color Frazee #8724M-Meadowlark Frazee #8683W-Tinderbox Frazee #818IW-Maison Blanche Reynobond Anodic Bronze Eldorado - "Cascade Rustic Ledge W / Rubble" VS4-20 #2, v.." Bronze 13. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 14. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" x 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 15. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department during plan check for review priorto installation. The installation of wall pack style light shall not be used along the street side elevation. R:ID P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitIDratt Reso & COAs.doc 6 Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits . 16. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 18. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 19. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." . Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 20. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 21. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan for the employee areas/ common areas. This area shall include decorative furniture and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 22. The applicant shall submit a detailed plan for the water feature subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Plans shall be substantially similar to the conceptual plan/photograph contained on file, PA03-0728 with the Planning Department. 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 24. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 25. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially to the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identity the total square . R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Reso & COAs.doc 7 . footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved plan). e. Submit an agronomic soils report with Construction Landscape Plans. f. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 26. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 4S-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. . Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 27. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet wall are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 28. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 29. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 30. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, . R:\D P\2003\03~0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\Draft Resa & COAs.doc 8 or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- . street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 31. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 32. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 33. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements . 34. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 35. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 36. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. . Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 37. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 38. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 39. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. . R:\D P\2003\03.0728 BPD LLCINov 12 Resubmil\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 9 . 40. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 41. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 42. . NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 43. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Planning Department b. Department of Public Works 44. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 45. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 46. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. . 47. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: RIO P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Reso & COAs.doc 10 a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207 A. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. b. c. d. e. I. 48. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approaches, street lights, storm drain facilities, sewer and domestic water systems b. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines 49. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 50. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 51. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 52. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 53. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 54. R:\D P\2003\03.0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 ResubmitIDraft Reso & COAs.doc 11 . . . . 55. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 56. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 57. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 58. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. . 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. . A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencernent of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. R:ID P\2003103-0728 SPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Reso & COAs.doc 12 68. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. . 69. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 70. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 71. Show all building setbacks. 72. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of T emecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions 73. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. . 74. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 75. All parkways including areas within the ROW, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 76. Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to issuance of Building Permits 77. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. FIRE DEPARTMENT The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 78. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. . R:IO P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINov 12 ResubmitlDraft Reso & COAs.doc 13 . 79. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1200 GPM for a total fire flow of 2700 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 80. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 400 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 81. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 82. . 83. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 84. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) . 85. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructedvertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 86. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 87. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 88. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After R:ID P\2003103-0728 SPD LLCINav 12 ResubmitIDratt Resa & COAs.dac 14 the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be . installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 89. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 91. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 92. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 93. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4) . 94. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 95. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 96. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) 97. . R:\D P\2003\03-0728 BPD LLC\Nov 12 Resubmit\Draft Resa & COAs.doc 15 . Special Conditions 98. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA -13,24,72 and 231-C. 99. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats rnay be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 100. The applicant shall comply with the requirernents of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 101. The applicant shall subrnit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) . By placing rny signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conforrnance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I rnay wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department Approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name . R:IO P\2003103-0728 BPD LLCINav 12 ResubmitlDraft Resa & COAs.dac 16 . ITEM #5 . . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: March 30, 2005 Prepared by: Stuart Fisk Title: Associate Planner File Number PA04-0394 and PA04-0605 Application Type: CUP/DP Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit (PA04-0605) and Development Plan (PA04- 0394) to construct, establish, and operate a 29,751 square foot church facility including a sanctuary, pre-school facility, parish hall, meeting rooms and offices on 3.75 acres. The subject property is located at 44651 Avenida de Missiones, generally located on the west side of Avenida de Missiones approximately 300 feet south of Highway 79 South (A.P.N. 961-290-003, 004 and 005). Recommendation: (Check One) ~ Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial CEQA: (Check One) ~ Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 (In-Fill) o Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas EpiscopaJ\STAFF REPORT-doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: Malkoff & Associates; Mel Malkoff General Plan Designation; Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Professional Office (PO) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant Open Space (flood channel) Single-Family Residential Open Space (flood channel) Lot Area: 3.74 Acres Total Floor Area/Ratio 30,273 sq. ft.!0.18 Landscape Area/Coverage 54,925 sq. ft.! 33.7% Parking Required/Provided 134 spaces required/137 spaces provided . BACKGROUND SUMMARY [8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. [8J 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment 2) has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-wide Design Guidelines, and the Development Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed St. Thomas of Canterbury Episcopal Church will be sited on approximately 3.75 acres located at 44651 Avenida de Missiones, generally located on the west side of Avenida de Missiones and approximately 300 feet south of Highway 79 South. The project will be comprised of two buildings, outdoor play areas and fellowship courtyards, and at-grade parking lots. The project will be built in two phases, beginning with a one-story 17,337 square foot sanctuary building with administration space. The sanctuary will accommodate approximately 266 seats for worship, plus approximately 26 seats for the choir during the first phase of the project. The sanctuary building will also include a state-licensed pre-school program and multi-purpose areas. The proposed pre-school use requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The church's administrative offices will be located in the sanctuary building during Phase One of the project, but will be relocated into the parish hall in Phase Two of the project, which will allow for . an expansion of the worship area of the sanctuary building to 386 seats. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 $1. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORTdoc 2 . . . At-grade permanent parking for 137 vehicles will be built in Phase One of the project, accommodating 127 standard spaces, 6 handicap accessible spaces, and 4 motorcycle spaces. The pad for the parish hall, to be constructed in Phase Two of the project, will be temporarily hydroseeded as a lawn area. Two points of access will be provided to/from Avenida de Missiones, and internal circulation driveways will contain a drop-off zone. Pedestrian areas and walkways with extensive landscaping, lighting, and monument signs will be included with Phase One. The 12,936 square foot parish hall will be built in the second phase of construction near the northwest corner of the project site. This building will contain a multi-purpose fellowship hall, catering-style kitchen, and service areas on the first floor. The second floor will contain administrative offices, and classrooms for various church ministries. ANALYSIS Conditional Use Permit The 3.74 acre subject property is zoned Professional Office (PO). Section 17.08.030 of the Development Code allows for religious institutions as a permitted use. However, religious institutions with a private school in the PO zone require a conditional use permit. Churches are allowed as either a permitted or conditionally permitted use in all zoning districts within the City. Single-family homes are located east of the project site. As the site is currently vacant, any development of the site will result in increased noise, lighting, and traffic in the surrounding area. As designed, however, the proposed project is consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. Furthermore, staff does not believe that the proposed project will result in impacts on the neighborhood beyond those of other uses permitted in the Professional Office zone. However, to minimize conflicts between the proposed church facilities and surrounding development, staff recommends a condition of approval that the outdoor play area for the pre- school shall not be utilized before 8:00 AM (condition no. 6). The applicant has provided staff with a schedule of worship and programs and a schedule for outdoor activities (Attachment No.6). This schedule provides a comprehensive list of regularly scheduled activities. In addition, various activities, meetings and programs (as defined in the attached schedules) may occur outside of the scheduled activities. To address future parking concerns, a reciprocal access easement has been recorded on the project site and the properties to the west. As a result, staff believes that sufficient parking will be available to serve the various project uses as described in the attached schedule of worship and programs and schedule for outdoor activities. Development Plan Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code and City-Wide Design Guidelines. The buildings meet the minimum setback requirements of the Development Code and the proposed lot coverage of 14.7 percent is well below the maximum allowed percentage of 50.0 percent. Staff has determined that 134 parking spaces are required to serve the proposed buildings, while 137 spaces will be provided. Staff believes that the distribution of parking is functional and provides access to all building entry points. In addition, an access easement has been recorded on project site and the properties to the west, allowing for additional parking opportunities if necessary. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\STAFF REPORT.doc 3 Access to the site will be provided from two drive aisles off Avenida de Missiones. The drive . aisles are connected to provide a looped access to and from the site. The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Elevations While staff had concerns with the initial project design, the elevations have been substantially revised and comply with the City's Design Guidelines. The proposed architecture is an early Spanish design with a tower element, tile roof, colonnades, exposed rafter tails, and wrought iron balcony elements. The two proposed buildings have been designed to compliment each other by using similar entry and colonnade elements, and by utilizing the same building colors and materials. The main body exterior building color will be Expo Stucco #52 Ivory and exterior trim will be painted Frazee Mission Brown. The scale and colors of the building are in proportion and compatible with the surrounding area. Landscapinq The proposed landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will effectively screen on site parking areas and soften building elevations. Project landscaping will cover 54,925 square feet or 33.7 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum requirement of 25.0 percent in the PO . (Professional Office) zone. Landscaping will be provided around the perimeter of the site, with a 10 foot landscaped setback along Avenida de Missiones and varied landscape planter areas of five to fifteen feet in width around the building footprints. Proposed trees include Almond "Garden Prince", Judas tree, Italian Cypress, Russian Olive, Ficus, Edible Fig, Raywood Ash, Southern California Black Walnut, Olive, Date. Palm, Pomegranate ''Wonderful'', London Plane, Holly Oak, Arroyo Willow, California Pepper, Queen Palm, Calfiornia Laurel, and Mexican Fan Palm. A total of 126 trees in either 15 gallon, 24 inch box or 36 inch box sizes are proposed. Proposed shrubs include Medicinal Aloe, Variegated Tobira, Bougainvillea, Japanese Boxwood, Papyrus, Lavender, Rockrose, Grape, Toyon, Sweet Bay, Texas Privet, Olive "Little Ollie", Hybrid Flax, Lemonadeberry, Chinese Wisteria, and Silverberry shrubs. A total of 459 shrubs in 5 gallon sizes are proposed. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION !:8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 32, In-Fill Development Project) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed church facility subject to the attached conditions of approval. . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 $1. Thomas Episcopal\STAFF REPORT.doc 4 . . . FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.050.010.F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The proposed project is also consistent with the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Professional Office zoning district. The project has been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Professional Office Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010.E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the general plan and the development code. The proposed church facility is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. A religious institution with a private school facility is a conditionally permitted use in the Professional Office (PO) zoning district. 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the general plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed church facility and private school against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed uses will be compatible with adjacent residential uses with conditions of approval. 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the development code and required by the planning commission or council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORT.doc 5 Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the Professional Office (PO) . development standards identified in the Development Code and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed church facility and private school and found that it will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Pianning Commission or City Council. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 2. Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 8 . 3. Development Plan PC Resolution No.2005-__ Blue Page 9 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 4. Conditional Use Permit PC Resolution No. 2005_- Blue Page 10 Exhibit A Conditions of Approval 5. Operational Statement - Blue Page 11 6. Schedule of Worship, Programs and Outdoor Activities - Blue Page 12 . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORT.doc 6 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\D P\2004\Q4-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\STAFF REPORT.doc 7 . . . ""' ~ :I: o p:; u ;;: ::J ~ ::2 ~ t5 o ~ ...l ~ ~ g . ~ ::,; t;; u ~ \.Ll ~ 'Jl = . eo= lrl - ~ ~~ ......\IS U .... QJ '5 .~ .. . 0 ~ "" ~ ~ , ~ " ~ " \} 0': bll c: < oa ...< :a ~ 0:: U '0 ~ 9 ~ ~ I:l is '"' oi o ~ >< c: Eo< :3 .... " u :g " " ~ ~ ~ " 0. ~ 0. VJ ~ g VJ VJ <I; " ~ li: ~ ~ :E . tr:: N ...- ...- ...- ...- N ...- N ...- N (') V w N , , , , , , , , III ...- ...- ...- 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. () () () ::3 ::;: <( a:: <( (f) C) C) C) C) --l --l --l , . . --l => 0.. 0.. 0.. , () () () () Z 0.. I- w w :!: e e e tI) e 0 0 0 :;::; 0 :;::; :;::; :;::; <Il <Il <Il <Il > > > Q) > Q) ro Q) w Q) e I W W w J!! .J:: t) .J:: 0.. .J:: - - t:: en en :::J Q) Q) Q) >- 'C <Il 0 S 0 en en e e e - <Il W (f) Z <Il <Il <Il <Il <Il e ~ 0.. .J:: .J:: 0.. 0 ""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. :;::; <Il ..... Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ <Il (f) 0 ~ ~ ~ I I Q) 0 ..... > 0 0 0 0 Q. 0 ;;: 0 0 Q) ~ (5 (5 (5 (5 Ol Ol Ol Ol <Il Q) e e e e "() u:: a:: w ~ :> () () () () ""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 en I ""0 I I I Q) I I I I <Il <Il <Il <Il e ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ro > ro ro C) C) C) C) <Il Q) Q) Q) Q) <Il <Il U <Il <Il --l Q. Q. Q. Q. I I I I I I I I - - - - <Il <Il <Il <Il !:: Q) Q. Q. Q. Q. ""0 () () () () UJ .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: Q. .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) en en en en !!! en en en en en en en en () () () () ~ en 0 ""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 .., :!: 'C 'C 'C "C ~ 'C 'C 'C 'C e e e e e e e e s::: x <Il <Il <Il <Il Q) <Il <Il <Il <Il 0 0 0 0 0 <Il <Il <Il <Il CD w 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. () () () () () --l --l --l --l .., C 0 . 0 .... 0 Q) - .0 ro tr:: ...- ...- N (') ...- N (') ...- ...- N ...- ...- ...- w , , , F III ...- 0.. 0.. 0.. ...- ...- ...- ...- N N ...- ...- ...- ::;: I- ({) ({) ({) <( <( <( Do: <( <( ({) I- <( => --l , , Z 0.. 0.. l- e e e e w 0 0 0 0 w :;::; :;::; :;::; :;::; :!: <Il <Il <Il <Il en > > > > ;;: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) W W W w :> - - - - tI) C en en en Q) <Il Q) <Il Q) >- c <Il Q) ;;: Q) ;;: W <Il :::J t5 .J:: .J:: .J:: .J:: - 0.. t:: t:: - - - 00 :::J :::J Q) '0 Q) c 0 0 0 0 Q) c Q) >- <Il ~ c c c c - Z Z (f) (f) .J:: <Il .J:: <Il tU <Il J!! e e ~ (f) (f) 0.. (JJ (f) 0.. !l. 0 0 ""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 !l. ~ ..... ~ I ~ 0.. :;::; :;::; CJ5 0 <D <D <D <D Q) ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ <Il ill ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ;;: 0 0 0 ..... > > ;;: 0 0 0 0 > > 0 ~ 0 0 Q) 0 0 0 .Q 0 Q) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 () u.. "2: () LL LL LL ~ W W ~ :> () () () () u... Q) I I I I I \ I I Q) I I I I I I > C C C C C C C C > C C C C ill ro 0 r r r U ill tii tii tii ill ill <Il ill ill ill ill ill ill tU co I .i- I- - :::J :::J :::J :::J OJ OJ OJ :::J Q) OJ :::J OJ OJ in () - D- o.. D- o t5 t5 0 0 0 1:5 Q. 0 t5 t5 0 .s:: .c Q) () ~ en en . ~ "~ S 2 Q) 2 S S S c c c S c e c c 'C "S ~I 0 ro ro Q) ~ ~ ~ ro <Il c: CJ5 iJj iJj iJj w w w w CJ5 w CJ5 CJ5 w (f) ({) (f) (f) (f) ({) 0.. (f) (f) 0.. 0.. I'll! j t Ii H!!!I ~~ U~ g G U~ ~~ ~ o U r./'J. s:: ~ ~~ O~ ~~ ~i . "< ~Ej CI.:)?1:l ._....,~ _~~GOa^~=>.l: ::::::;:~/, } >~ 3~:-~ Ii 2/ H~? '1'r'.so?Sld3 S'V'HOHJ. '19 """.........u,.,.,..~ J.:::I<lH<;;;-UIJ. ~ > j ~ ~ d~ ~~~~~ ~~i~~ ~q u ~ FF<-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !5 III III III III ~ ~~~~~ it . x w D <: ~ z W , W < r , "' i r , ~ . r c , , . " "" 'I ~ -: ~ ~'."" i II iHiii'llll n!nn ~ ! I I II !! '!I ! I II! I I : ~~~~~~t~ h ~ ~ i;: I ~ Ii ~n ~ ~ I r I, "',' i II' i IllIlll.1 ! II,'! I I . gill! ' . II'! I llqq! III Ii :l !l i Ii Ii I ill!! 1111 , o z ~ o . zz= G ~:t g~il i= ! 8 ~~8 ~GG -J --Cl -FF .~ 'il 88 ~o-- < ' "N~sg~~~e -i ~~!,~R8o. ffi QO '::R~"l::Ii~a r 83~g~';'':';:jr53tt'. I<J . !~hl!!I~:l ~ ~ d'!~mg'~. ~ <(<(<<l-(<<~t", ~ ~ mu~m'\l 8 ~ j~~~j~jj5iu l2 j! i! 11! i ,I: I! l!' nil 101 <" "! I ill! '!l ;!'q, , ",",1 Pjl!i ; I , l d 1B ~~ ~ t~;~~ 11.111111111 ! H!I III " gill ;'1 1111 Hill III I I I ~ i I I I ~ !I I l II iI' I ~ II Iii II, III III :~ ~ll! iil! !il: II! ~ij! 11 !m h ~!,!i ,. , , ~ h. ! '! I!! II I I ! 'I I H~'~ @i.U ~ ~ ; @ A i ~~ ,~ 1 It' ~, ~~~, .! ,~! ~ h ~ ~l i.' ~i A~ ~ ! ~~ ~~~~ ~.,~!~ " ~ z ffi , ~ ~ L . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ , ; ~ d ! ~ J PI . HIHi n ~! di ~iii ~l!~ . ~I'l . MI ~5j ~Ih I'~' ,dU , <~"l --' i < . ,. " ;~ ~~ Ill! ~ f Ii.! I. " I !1m !i !i ~ ill 9' 101 ~! Wl! <> ~!"~,,ll Li II I I I III Ge HH m H!!!!!! 1111111 m Ii Ii I I Ii :!i!i!i . ':1' 1 !!!!! !!! I d,! !! !! !! ! II!! 1 Ill! '~ Ii! Jd .'IIIIIIIIWl 1'1 I JII':'II II !"'['~ i., II ! ljlll! II !II! ',I!!>>l . III 1'!JlIiI ill \I 1111111111111 Jill M'l!l' i!I'Pft I luul:j M ~ ....:< ~ U'" 1'Ll~ ::Sm I'Ll'" E-", "'" ::r::E U...o Z 0::"" ~i;! <li ::r:"'" u'" ~. ... o..~....:<O ~ < ID ~o... ~~ UJ 0:; r>: 1'Ll~ (f)'" ~(I) ::Sr;j au ::r:r>: E-O: E- (f) " f: if1n 111m ',!II I! l~~fl5 ,,;1, I " ! , i l I i il~ lji PrS ~ ; i ". , rl" ~~~ '- 1'1" ..j;;; ~! r~~~;t i~ .~~ l! ~~~~~: ~ II, Ill" , ~" Ii! II ~ ~ I 'I' f. i i ~! ~ ~ i ! ~~~~~ !llm,,/! l!~ 'I I gjj H ~ ii,'~, Ii. I! ,::';;:" ~ ,iill ~.. ~ i!lLl till ;;1 i al ! ~ g .. ,! ii' , ~ ~ ..- I! i I . ~! ! I ~ ~ ~ . ~ > ~ 'I"" I::' :~~.~-~-:t;--:~~~<~::::::~~:~~~:~~~,~\\\\\/\\\:'l \ ..........a.,.:'f" """,w.1 \.1'1'\\,\\1\'\\ I I'..... Iii -I!, '. , r !,7~ u S> i~, !I!l' . .,! - , I r B3 ~ ~ , i , . ,iM ~~.~~ . oE. o::~~ag "~!~ lItj" B < :s @ ~ ~.. Q i d~; ~ ~ ~., ~I ~M !ii ~i' 0;,; ~ l', ~ l~" I I ~ 8 , " ~ ! 11 . . !I ! . )iil I I kl'l g '1 1 H ~ i j ! g ~ li] II ~ dl 1 ~ 100 j , g 'I , , , I. .. , .1". !!! ! 1!! · 1",'1 '. II" . ,', l Ii' '!. , , I i' I!i~~~~~~~~~i ~~;~1;~ri;~iI5,,~ j ~ ~ ~~ Ji~ 8 ~ m ~ ~ -, ~ !I ':l~.~, ~ It II i ~ OJ ~ ~ !! ~ ~ II . ~ ,,~: oj ~ 5 ~ iii :.. ~~ i; b ~ ~ , : !O ~ ~ 1 ::': t ~ 2 ~~ ,li<ldl":,'k. li!!I!~:j!'i!l:li"! ! " : I "! Il, l ,<1M ~gi !~~ ~~ii i!r:!IiI~:~~~~~i~;'~ ~gn il..!I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ld~ t ~~;~Si ili/'ir/1m,O!1 d1:fl!! i!lli jlHi!lhHpl!!H.!L';~1 i 'ihliillill dlil1! 1 11!!!1:!!!li,.jl,:I!M, ilJlljl,lfJl!II,! I !~Il Ii! ! I! II! II i i j II!! !! WI i, ! U! I iii i! W J I, !II111!1! 1i: ! II" -~.~~ ,~ ~~i ~~ .. L g ~SI. ~~~ ~ ~ ~: c ~ ~ r g i ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. Q 9 .. e "I: l!i!hhmil!iMi!iiil!l!!:! !ill!lm !llll~; d II! Iii! i!! d!; I ~:II! I: i I II: I! liMi!i i G8 80GG G@G @@@ ~@]) '" ~ ,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ g ,. ~ ;< ~ :<I >l ~ 1lI >l ~ :; ': :: ~ !l !l ~ ~ !l II 0; \'( ~ ~ ~ :'I ~ :II ~ ~ ~ '"' !% ',. ..' ~s n ~ i~ <J~ SIO,."'.,.?:;'r; , , ~*3i i "~!! l ;~ii i P~~': ~ . i Z I ""'_'WY"''''''~''I<'''''W6"''-'-om,~\", ~l: ! I~ 'I" '.".' i ~H jl:ii 1;i}EEI~ I, ~Ilm ~,,;l, "I i;""'I' :~ ~H"" ~ III:. [: \' , ! : I 'I"; I j ~I ~ i . ! ~ ~ 6 ~ . Ii Ii I, J Ii I , I illl!! ~Iill* ~~~l~i!~ i , 'i,5 ! i. ',' , ~ ~." i ~ ~ll '" "ill.!. ~' h:~~~", ~ !Ji;~i!5 i . -i,nL !i;/lg 11',1 . . 'i' i ;, -< ....:i ~ UN ~ ~~ ::S'" ""N ~ I'-<Il. (f] ~ U..., ""'" ~"1 '""" ~~ Po; ::q <<: ull. Ii:: ~ I ~....:iO g <.t: ID ~P-. Z~O~ ~~ug .1 [fJo ...... -~ /"'\ P-.:I: ...... "" E-< [fJ"" ~ -<'" L. ::S..., ::; 0 1:) rr. ::q ~ V" I'-< 0: ,: i d ,'I IIi! I'-< [fJ ! ! .x." 1'-.",:.; "'",.' ! _ J .~/ _"_____ _" --(""" -~~~~-l---- c<) <-t{,.,,~ i "'c,-'< j ~ c' &6'<:, .vl::, ~ ~ v~?Q- li' ~~ u~ ~ ~ ~I <Y ~ ~ ~ Ill! i ! ," 1 ,'I'! 'I ,;1 , jili III,! j:' iii 1 j;I.H 1i, II! i Ii I , I: !!.! , , , , I '" . ','" -. i I ! ' " .,', ;~;~~I~~I!;je lilgh.51'~;:~~~: l! l8 ';' ~~:; ~ ~~~i ,1Ii: ~ : ~~~,., I ~~i:t ~~~ i ~ ~ . > ~ ~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :0 i ~ ~ .. n f~..~ hr;~g~~~:~ i:~~1i~~~i!ili2~~~~!i~ ~ i~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ d~:O ~~~~~~ ~~:~IIJiJIH!!ill t i lIi111il i!!;i! I! !;nh Ill! h d i!! h d n I I j i!!ill! ! ii ! d mIl i, 1"I'i;~'!'I' "",'h!';';I"'l'P'I!'ll ''''''l''! "I!'"'!,I" !!'!lll!,.' lii/lIIIIIWil!!1 j, lliliil,iiil!il ilillij!III!! I Ii! Iii I i Ii Iii I!! I i III i i II Ii 1 E i Ii! mill i III 11 li!U !i !hil;l!H i1Mh:hbl!!1i lill!hlllll i i ~;!! i! ~ li i! II ~ d I ~ I!: i III: ill!! I! !il;!:! i! I 00 8800 ffi0 @@@ @iI@@~~~I:;:;~~~~=:;~=g~~~~~~~Jil~~:'~~~~~~;~~::~~~:II~Ill':i~ i i 1~ '-'~f;r-~'\--~' :{)~ Ile~iJ if '" \ \ "'" - , I 'c... " ! CI) j i . ! ~Iii I '~'!' i !, 'C. '~!si :3 ll.,!~E i3 !>l~t;" ~ ~ ~ Ie . . 13. >-il. ~ D ~ ~ I!! ! g!~~ I~ If ~ n~ ~ 8 ~li !~! ~ I!i ~ I,. I I " ~ ~ i'l ! ! Ii I 'Ii ~I Ii; . i' 'j ill I I ~d . i il .1 . I ' t. · I 1 ~rn"l ~l ,- . ~ """," . II i I , , ~~h I :j~U ~ :illl P~". i ...l ., i '-" . Q I . ""'_.....__..,...''''''-.....-....'_l-.-"u~ ~ t':':'~~ ~ r-'~ '-'H~ '"'~.~ .......~--. ""__N~ .__....... ._._... ~'_"H HI i il II I,d 'id Sl~X . i_,' ~~~~ ". !~l !' \ .11 ii' ".I f! '1- I,., III:, d I ~l> ,,~~ ;! Iii Ii: Ji {ii R III III ill! ., j l~: ~!.J 'j !. ,l .,,! ~!q . !! i' II,! II 'I ,I !, >, Iii i , , I 1! 'f ~~ , ! ..~ I~ 8~ '" " ;;i~ c' " i' , ", Ii ~G , , llll 'I '. ~ . ,jl". Ij, H i , , ~: ~: .~;I i.d" "! ,,~:: ~ ~;; !b~ e ! l 8 8 i , , ,~ , r<< $: ~jj ,ii,'",. > 5!~~it ~t ':<0 ::.~ ~ 'I" I"i' 'I, 3 :::'10 ~i1 ~g ~=t 3~ d.~~!I r~ 'i!it' """, L..... . ... ~~::; _~ N gH 3)0, .~~li g~ g[; I , , , >., ! I' , , , 'I Lil,i ~ !il ;; ; 8 ! . , e~ ! t "~i ;; 'I- t>~.,. 1'1 I, ~ '~..\.d i; " i< j) l ".." ~ '" I' " "1 gt lIIS ~S~ ~= ;1; I;e! e~~ ~~I ~ ~~illl!:~~ -' 11 "~~~!in == ~~ ;.h:: :!~~ ~ II l!fi!~!i ~ I ~~ , ~,., Ii ~! I !~~i I~ ~. ".,. , 'W;jl, !!!!ll G ,- II ....., .....~-_ r_ _..., "'__ ~".~_ _~_^_ ____ . , I Ii I! i! !! ~ I .~~ IlD T tt== II u ~ ~ . 1 @ I , , l I ! G I , , , i , I r_," H ! i I !I i I! ;1" l ~ '" ill,; e" ~ i~n~~~~ .j",.!! ~ ~ o C'? . I f Bo . i . ! ! Ii; i i !!!jll~~ , '~G' ~ ~~~~g :s t1j!!d ," ',.. ~ ~ ~ !"' . i is ! c 4i) 9G~ I : ti I!! @! ~m Iii l~: ~8 !~~ I.) 1,1 ~ !Ii ~ j,. I I li'l II i1 ! , Inl Ii, , 0 , , i'i j !J hj' j " I 'I . , , ~ I ';! , '. 1" ~ I 1 ~ i I I @ , . I, '" II i! Ii " i ~ I j @ "~. I l;!S~l! ....,1.es 5~" I ~~~!Ii "" .! I . ..._...,.."",,<OOU,,/!'....WIO...--,...II'._\~ Wi! t-.".,'nr>a<a.l _ao~<>MV>v...."" """""""'''''''''~ :;:::;:~t-d>>~ 3~:--~ /. ~ I NI/:1 ! i. i; Hlid H~? ,'V'dO?$ld. ST'v./OHJ. 'J.S N'v'1d 1!lOOl..l ).1!lV"nJ.:>N'lfS I I I . Lj ! i . \.-----,--~----_._._---,------ - - ,'~ r--' ! i "I "'-'""","" ~~ ~= ~) I (!l :!') . ~ i < ! ~ 'I, II ~r ! II !I !tl i I , j~ '1;1 ! ~i:; 'I I, ,Ii '\' 1:G3 , I, I. \ ::)1; ~Ii! ~ ;!; ) ~i(l!! " ' , I , , , ' II II ~ . ~ '. ~ ()" J (~ IL . . ~I'j ,I, ~ , - , ~I'! ~h o " -_-,It - ------ - ---~ T I i t.! I L ,; ~l u \)- Ul L .1t1,'1 ifj':.!1 !dl'~ "I!Jhl 1'!l'iil ,1'llf< .1,nN 111"jl' mil:' !Iitd:! . I ' f---~;.<.._----~ - ---~.. -- --- -- ~'.,,~.- <~'"_. ---,"- WI! :::!:;:~~n>>~ 3~:-~ Ii ~ I H?b!nH? "'T'1dO?Slda S'v'HOHJ. ".is <_."..,~ ..."......,v""'""v""'O< i. to 1 Ii!' J _ ~ Ill! Jl S.Lno;"V-1 3'b'I'UIN'/!Ir\;O A~VI1J.?N\iS . (.~ - .::(~):. '000'000' '000'000'000' 1OOSJr::=t ~ . -:.~}: - ~r & ~~iiinl~o "'~,',,',~""""~.. ~,-~ ~;:::'I. =~ ~O/ . ..J oi) Z ;::: ..: w <Jl - '.}- I oc ..: i'" \l z. ..: <Jl I- '" () ?;: ..J ~ m ;::: ..: w <Jl w \l z &I. w' z- () \l ~~ ..~ rO rO ~rOrO~ "~~rOrO~ ~~~~ ~D ~ I- '" () }- ~~ ~ " Ii' g g .. 1 1 ~ ~ , & e.. ~ . ~ iL U i I ~ ~ I J B . 0 I- ~ ..: ..J oi) Z ;::: ..: w <Jl I- w. ",' \l z. ..: III :~lj! 11ji:.lt 1!,!I'~ "Ihlll 1'!l'ill ll'lll' 1,'JUr. l~'jl,! !filll!! !I'll i . t tfhd .........,~ -""""~""Y'.''''' H~nH'::l 1'v'dO?Slda S'v'HOHJ. 'lS """..".,."."",",~ s~no)..'I'" ;n;ruIN~n.; ..........ru?N'o'S C1<laNVolX;::J il , .I.,~-'<< Iii I - !~!'..-' ! . j, i- <>~'\I ~l:,_ ~ ~uu~~m ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~'l (8 4"", 0 lH il.~~-';-i~ ~ ~!hqj:,;- -.,!T1..t ! / Ga 0 -' .I.-..:i..ot-= ~- II I I, \' ~ l F.J~! .,~;--- (k~;'-- --t~):.:.-- .~ , , , , " , : , , <>~'\ ; ~"l' O~I!i ~ ~ GaD ,.....",.A'; . IIlI.,11 -OJ, I P' I I I 1111 IIII 1"'" """ , , , , , , IH, , , , , , , I"'j , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , "~I "" ,"ti" "" Of9TJHi I I II \ jHlJ:. , Itl"'" ""'''' '''''''' ,,1 "~""''''_J ,>>~ ~~:-~ Ii ~ I . or'.-'J<r"r/-xr, .,,;-..~ It,,) "'zj '~b -';;H} l- e> () }- <{ -' III z ~ :lJ III \l z ill. III IL z. () \l " a a ~ ~ ~ iRiii ~ m ~t ~ I ~ ~" s <~ I J< , ! ~" r . ! II r~ i i. .< ! ,m H L~ l- e> () ~ -' III z i= <{ III ill I- Ill. <J z- <{ lfl . l- e> () }- <{ ;) z i= <{ III ill ~ <{ ~. \l z- <{ ill '1,11'1 li't!l !!!h'~ . t~l~j"1 1'!lI'11 ,I'lff. i~II!'r. l~lllr !lill!:! . i P II i,ti: HIli! . ,.,...."""'~"--""" ..<."".,,-...., :;:::~::':~r-7"~ 3~~~'.~ Ii ~ I .......,;'...-ro;o.w H~n-f? 'V~O?SI=;;~~:;'.:~ N'v'ld dOO~ ~ ]':' :-:-;-:"'" ;';"',,' ':f,;,,:,;,' i:i" J\! Ili ' ~Ii,'i' 'i ii ~c ' ie' , ,'- '" --"i ";, "..);!;:: 'I ,'_I';; I, ..~ :" ,: "'" ,,:," <:, 1;:, ~!), i" :i' :"', ~J:: ~- r----: !i ;! :,,:' ' d L:::, ~'I-,-f' ! : ,;. ,~ ," . '- ~ ie: ' .: :_" -'e 1I,':>:! ,_! I.' "<'i~' \ ," ii: ,- : ,; ;I,' ,i , . 1::1 I:. ",., :: - < -i ie-.;' , " L,i,L-<- ! ',',.!:' ":, ".,':;', " :'X/r^i ~ ,"~~:cir' ':. ' :, :i> .' " ::~ ! ,.:"'!' I,!." ,~:", .' /C"': I" ':,;;'[~ ~ : 1'..:i-}:t,>J, id ,,' " "" ,:: ;ei.-_ . '~ .' '_':~1;" ' , '!\' ,--" ;;, ;; i..h ',el,':-.-'< ":l,e; i":' :"1' ", "C, "'1__ I" '<i,L I. " ,-.i, ;'1' .',', ., J~ j ,,, -::idJ , 1-, ,..:" ::, b -, "'.': '.::-;' ' ':~_:eU ". c." ;:[ 'i' '-- '.",. i:::.,"'! Ie <, ,"~ ";'1.-. ~i .- ,.- : ~i ';; F !J~ ,e ',- 'I; 'e; !ro-,~~c ,: ," Ie ' :,ce ',I. ,,,!,:' I ,.' "'-, : ',I, ',:.' t. ; ,- ie ;c: :- ;' .'- J-- ' :',,' , :,' '- ,'J "" " :; ,- !-'::- ,-, : i';' ~ ~:l . . ftJ z <{ -' IL n. () () II" 'I,ll'! i/'[,jl Il!h'~ "n,lll j'!J1lij ,I'llf' .,1'1111 '~I'l ' 1ll'1'- !lilJHl iH ! ' 01 i _ t , flI III ..."...:~~~= OHJ. '.1<$ IToO?Slda S";'H H~? ,.";."",,,,;.,..".~ $NOI.L"^,"'i:llOOI'!!lOUX3 """~_.,-""'~ ''',,/1,--'''', --; 0'"-''' (<lrl-". C1 ""-'''(<',),u i.<( ....V ''',H)"-,>>(,. 3/1" ~ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- -----;;". gl <1 " ill'l -, ~ Ill; "-j ! "'I h ;;'1 l'!i':ii f lY.1~ ;>11 ~ M ~ iw ~ f II < I ! , k il' !l! ~!j! @ ,~ -.,. f @ '" W I '" Z lL i I ! I! -II 1 ~ II! hi h, ~ ~h. ;!!. !!l. ~ @ @ @ . ZI gi "-' ~I ~I "'I III s:.r TI~ 1--:; w.::~ 6'. -,II o !"' d !i . 'iI I'll I'~l':.fl II!'~ II, I"~ l~l~j II 1'!!I'll ~illf. 1~1J!IIH !Gill' l!illh! . ~ ~ ~ ~ f 1 " Ii 1't Ulld . II !! !., ;11 !j, 'II ill m!i, @ III @ III J: '!! z iL Ii' o iii I ! I !I j" l "! " I, dl Ih ~ii, jli; !il: @ @ @ . , ~ ._""?~ -><...."""""',,..,.. H~nH? iT'dO?Sld3 S'v'HOHJ. 'is """...""",~~ 9NOI.l."'^3"13 ~OI"!/3JX3 , , " , @ ~ ~ ~ f ", 8D __.J ~~ 1 "" ' "'.J I: Ie". Jh" "" ---.::' ~(--.~,~~- ~!i ."'.,,,..........,,.,., .'''-H.IU.) '$'f' ..,,-... (lJlJ ~3J ) ~3;:-~li ~ I .~~ .~....I, t d 'I !, ~ t II 'I l, ~I ~I '.., IllI idi ,.. ", <{; Illl :ri~ ~i~ 0' <nil t d !I ~I ill[ _I! (Uj ~! ~i i"1~ co, 2i1 t II II 1, r ~ :~ Ii' JI!I':.I1 Ij. I'~ "I~llh 1'!l'iij ,llllt' ",uli I~!"I!' mill' !Iill!:! ! Hi! t. ;, , < ! ' tl i! l z o i I II > d I'" I " ~1'::::'jH ~ :!l"!l d, g :Ill 111'/; _ ! :1 " I I I I:;: 1:;: I:;: w Q. ~ . w o , " i i ! I I! il , z . ~ ~ Iii 0 :!: ~; ~ ! ~ I <{ ~ , , ;f. ~~ 1; ,Ii > 11:1 I' '!' }- hi! i "/ ; " z <{ i L i ~ I " .,q "'10 " 0 i ~i .- w t ~ ~ I Q o. 0 ~~ " ~~ ~ ,~ Q. 1!1I Ii . ~ . Q ~ '" '" w ~ ~ I ~ , ; <i ;r! I i !I :< " 1>, ! ~..- , I ~..~ ~ ,Illln I I' .\ 'Iii z Q , ~ , II <{' , ~ l~ 1;' !: 1;' I: 1;' j'if ~ II ~ 11 ll, !; g ,M III III 'I; w Q ~ ;h 111 i'll! i 11;- i'" : 1;- , ll'!l < 11 ~ III III III <""",,,,,'~ ""-""~~--."cg,,,, ::;:~:;:':/.,. J"~ 3~~-~ Ii ~ I . H~? 1VdO~I..j;I SVHOHl "J.S N'r'1'" )..J.,.,J'o'S 01.111 III U $ ~1 l~~ t ': ~ , ';' Iii .. I'! i'!, * .' . N llll d. "":""'1'"., '.,','. :."C".,::.,;:;.:.:.-:.~--",;;",~--~o-~~~~ ~___.F"""-~--'-i'I,--:__._lT, :-'~l~.i.-!"" - ;' '. - . I r r'o" .. '''':'. ...w...L.. ."., . > ill: ,--,"- ~d~;-., ,"U';',_ -... ~:, if"" t~;~'-1-:rL'-'"'~~-"~~="-"<;"-"''-; F-n '", ;)~nf~~lL ~l~~-~~i' : ~.jn:) ~:i~ H ::1 (:_:; L:tIJ: [Ii ,o.:'-l-~i---" (,\7' ;~t iJ.;nn<nL.,. f I'u....... ,""I '-1 I:: 1 " . . <..'.l.!11.11.. ),' -, ~ 1 :;.~_, &1"1 ._..L- ;<.., i;; U.'!I! I !i'''~~I~iU I Wi li;:ii il,!.1 c' '" II' t, Il,f _.i :- .,'-!i: ,~!Il81 i-:C H _I b" ,1,."."",,, ..,. , ~ !" 1"""1' 'e "" 'i>fj ii I'. :' !~ J ':1 I'"'' U ilr'f I! ~I~! ';I~I:~~~I:!:: I ~" " .I .~lj~ ',L~"!f : i .I:I! ,j:; "c. .! ,'1, ! !I' 'I~I'"II .,"- ,-., .l.. ". : c.: r::.;w : _ ~;' g II; )-f~~. '~~d .~' ~. ~~ _1ff1 ~ i\ \; \ :1]Ef i~, _ .. .~i~ III ' ti r Ill;" I oJ 0 '~~L'" q.. I ",'if.>" "1'1 ,<0 I ,,~lii'P.' . Yf~': : :..~t!r : ~'~~~':! d:~) J____~,,, ::~' " - ~ \'0:./ ~. ~..,. ~i!J II. -:,~! /:: "' "-' "I --(-. ~! ~ \fI- J ;--! !!o .J " i ::!.~~~~~~ .C, IIi 1 ,I ;1' . - .! ~ b ::;-~~q~~~~; ~ I ':",(~!~~~~~&1 l I ~ . .!I ':~I:i~~ . ;'tt~!~U , , ~ " l) ~ 10 /':,1[;:-- -'~III!ii01~ i"r-J ~,,~ : ~ ~ ; ~~i l.~: ':8[~~~i"i0 I~. II , Sltl" ~il2i i;~.~ .~' ..-----.:;~. ~qLJ '"' 11 i; ,1 j, II !l!~,i~~rd!;;,;~tr ':J[j,,~~ ill: r" I'il ','!II Ill! I~:j Jq__jI ~ i <l-'- -~ il /- I'.' I' ~.~ ~I! I il,i .."c-....r.cc'.. ....,;;~;;';, ~.Lm , ~I:i' ; Ill; !"'J~L,,; illl ! I II hi;' __ __; ~ l! o;_.......\. 0 ,0 . ."'......-{-..:..:.:..:;.2j 8~ -... "'..... --- - "!ai'I-,1~ - ,~J IIr . 'If) ~ ~ riifil i. f:l :~ i-I -rJ :di,i ,J.Q !1 . II !!~ ~j: , ~~ ~ ~ .' ::, II Ei; ~~ i~ i z g ~ 31. I Ii ~~ pc ~ I, Iii ~ ; Ii ~h a Iii di g Ai I 'I, :.;,!, D < Q liill 1 E ~ ~ ~ ... z <{ ~ o " " o J < " 2 ~~"~ . 'Ii ;; I E ~., ~ ~i! j ;" 1,10 i w D ~ . , , . , < " . -. " " 0 'I 'I '! :! ! g ~!> I. !. " . . d II dd 0 ~ . " > -./. ~ ~ " ~ ~ 'I, Il'l f'"I'tll III" II'I'! "l!'!1 1'!J'iij 1I'Ill, "jJill I~ 'Ii!' mill' !Iilil:! ~ l~ii! . ' ~ : Ii ~ ill ~ Id . . . . IIllI . . . . I HI! i t .t t! I! d ~~ U'" ~! UB g g~ o u CZ) ~ ~ ~ CZ) ---'"1...-- ~)ooooooool ~ ; ~ g;]j ~i ....... ,- ,-,--. -..... rn "'''-'''1...) 'XI'~ ~"'''''l7/d P'm7. 6u;.;.oou""u3" _ ....::~"',;;6J1';;,,-;~;.~'~ i ~ .--~,,~ _.."""ataAV'.'>e ~rlH? "TTdO?Sldd SVHOH..L .,L<; .13311\;3"111.1 ~ ~ X d w . (\ ~ ~H < ~ ~ . 3 - . 0 w ~ ~ M ~ ~ w ~ t ~ I ~ 1 '" i . . ~ . . - . ~ ~ n~ ~ e , . . . . ~ ~ "1 ~ ? ~ . . l- i L . . ~ x ~ z ;:; , i ! I! i " 'I i l II h' ~ /II 111111 hi ill 5 ~I!. ~!I. !!I, !I. ~!I. I Ii !n~ !n~ , ~ ~ ~ ~k. ~ 1. f h g ~ g < '! ~ ~ ~o, ~ . -, " i ! i !h! " ~ . !' !.. 1 I I Ill! !! ~ I II!!, ~ ,I ,LHH~ '!I'''!' "'II ~h -,-..".... ~ D ~ ~ !!! t t <( ~il. hi l i ~! ~ ~ ~~; ~; ~ ~l s ~ ~i ~~ !i !!: ! II III111 i i. ~ ... " ... li!!1 'I' - < , · , ! i d. i ',I II ~ I - - - --!I!1 i ll'lI! ,',lIi-W .. i:! i! ., 'lllllllii 1Il !,!:n~ ~h~~l~ ^ . , gg;; i t r:;::li1 >= 8 ii' iM ~ ~ 8'~~8" ~ ' """3,,~2~~ t ,,0 '8S , ~~3~~~';'l: ~~ I: 33~~~~~~o8~ !!! ~ u~~~ss~~~~ & 3 ii~!~mgl~ <.o(<<<~<.(< :!l ~ ! mU~~Ul!l 3 f mmmh~ ! . I 1 'i II I ! l!l; ill jill' !l Ii! " ,- 11 i ill i I:! , i ill "I ' !. , i d Ii ill!!! Llil II ,III /.1111 j .. Ii!! 'I Iji Illli I! I iI II II ! 1\!1 ~~ . In~ ~;f Ii-! l' ~ " I H!. :'1 I, ~I ~:~ lp hI' ~! Ij \i 1 ~., Jl l ill! ~'~l it! iiU ------- - ---- --1111- . !!l! ! ,,2l ~ .J hi Ii! -'I 1 I'I! 1 !~,I Jd Iq III ~ ~~~~U II I; I I;; lllllll H !! I In ii Ii I iil i II 1 !! P! m :ku II!! lI!Hm Illl 'l'l'llllllllllllli" : 111'1,1 I, 'Ii II , I ' II " !!lllillillllil II! i . . ,!,Iil li':!!l !!!h'~ "I:,hl 1'!J1iij ,1'lff' "luli l!l'lli lUiI:' !Iil/I:! . I!! ! ! ' , " ill u I . . r-H I I I I ! i I ; il 'I i ! i I -, <>4i<>o""~ _...""'...",,...... H?l!InH? WdO?Slda SV'HOH.!. "J.S ""'''M'''_.''_ NV1o:J ~OOi=' l?1:l!.1 "'V'J1 fjSJ),J'V'd 8""'"'''''''''''''' ,....S..,_A.....,..W .".-....i<ic)n. 6u'''-''t>j,{''''''7' 6ul-'>'"'''''''' --: ""-1" U,.) ~.. U"J.<Oa .to!-<'/U/. I""""'l>~'~~' ,~ ....{, .,,/6..;0 ''''l. 3/1" r5Cd i iL "' I~ " o"i r- z <{ I 0:' !'ll Il' () () -' ~- IL I- 1Q j[ " -' -' <{ r @" r, III oc- <{ ,. IL @ I I ., '" "I ~---------____._n",.,,_____n_n~___-I (~ fS'-t.{ '0-(" I}') -tb If) m--!tl o.-~ 0~") 0',(.-J 0.0 -< 0';\ 1'>,,0, [':;.'9 00 \'l 1i:'\1t.l z ID 1:,1 It:..Jfl ~:OO] ;:: :G:C,J t~Q I;;lir;'; (:C':;;:' <( 'J [r) +.':>ck ~l1l:~1 0(';: III '!f <r'CH r%:<p 1-. ~ ,s!.(:.s lU- =>' J5& f~'::'I ~ 0\:1 if"' G It.r I~IJ ~('6) z IV!1' r.(Q ui <{ f.;~ :Gi0 ~ (:;0 f.u::j III ~'C): ('jl), :1::.-;:") 'tt. 0' 'It::u.91 fD o,j " c~ .';."::i,;j; ~, -~ 'i.:,':;;.> 0<;' r!j~~~ ll~~t' t~0 . " r~-g-eJ~w ~B&O{.+BJ~'- w~ W~I -< \'l z ;:: ~.:eai&U=:J ~~G4:,;i-t;il <{ OJ rs;;:;9IBoo III lU 19Se~BJ \l z ill, [~QiJOC:91 lU IL :fiB*0+3J z- () \l [e~*Ete1 '~ III ~ig:9J~G-eJ ~-' I ~" - .'-G-S'I .;;.. b -~ l'IJUt '8frJ'O;;ry !I. {'q D,l "Ihhl 1'!Pill ll'lh' i~I!lll ..' lS'jl,. 1"' jil !1I1.. " ! !Iii ! ,j , - . HIli! "-.Y')~ ...".................,,"'.""" .....,- ,-,.,--.,-,,,,, w ....-...w.)p~ 6uIUU"ldpu"71 6u>.u."J5u.i. N ""-'H"I".J'1U u~'a_'''11 I".ml'"l!V"'-1'1 ~ ''''1- '''A,;.-,,,I.. 3/1" ~ I iL L _ . H~I"lH? "TT'dO?SI,d;; SI,(WOH1",J.S _Th<>o""""d""""""'" N'I".. '!IOOlol QN07.:lS "'1'1-1 HSI'l!II'Ir'.. 1-- n_____________ II;! II II;! II !N *1 ~ ! !I,I ,,- -\ lit; z 4: ..J IL Ii () () ..J IL Q z () \l "' ill ..J ..J 4: r r. ill ii' 4: IL . II:! !Ill !llil !Il! ~------- i , , I r--~----------::;.:.z"~---- 'hl'll IfI'r,1! !!.II'~ "1111b 1'!lIiil ,J.tIf' "luH l~ 'Iii lMiI t !Iild:! . !Pl! ! ~ , i Ii I; uIHl . . . ....-""V?~ _..00 VaJi'W.",.,.... .,~..~,-.,..-- ,"""'_""JW~<I><a,oQ",,, ,,~,-,_. -'"'' rn c,,,-..,r,,.)...,,, 6"~"""ldPU"7' 6u........'''''3. - ....-... I.,.) ~.~ ..61....07 .........,u/. 1">~nl"lI'1~~r. it ''''r, "lIS.I._~nL. 3/1' t5C1 i 0.. H~? 1"".,jO-:)Slel3 S'iHOHJ, "J.S NV"'!d ..oo~ """'1-1 HSllOVd I~ z -( ...l II- II- () () ll' ...l ...l -( I I.. \ll it- Ii: '1,11'1 1""1 /111, I!, I'~ lllh"~ j'!l'lij 11"If, ~1'J1h I~"l!' l~ll r !Iill!:! H~~ ~ , "'I o l="-i ~I Ell ~i~ 01~ cOil u m , U , 'I H~f1H? -'_<>;;:Y"~"""""'" WdO?Sfd "",,^yo.- ~:':HOHJ. '.LS -. OSNQIJ.,. A'ai3 ~Ol:= ~ ~ ~ .....",- ::;:~...(mJiI"J "" ,....." ." ",,' ,. .:,;:",::;,:; . -::::.:-;:";'; rn ...." '''Ii,) . ".,,,,,,,,,,. Pi ,"/. 3/1/ ~; 1- IUu I ' . , Illl !,I ill ~!!! 1.0 @ 9 ~i~ ~ Iti; ~ I ' I ~il IL !' ! ~ II ill I ~ ~!l ~'!i !I!! x ~.!i ~!I, ~,' OJ @ @Lo' gh . @ M!m ~m<m " < _ m . m m " " , ,,' ~ U :{ m 'U ~ ~ , ZI 0' f':! ~I ful ~Il ~!l .,1 51 I I-I 4, ?,! ...Ji wi m @ l , . (51 0001 i-.! ~I UI iLlI, ~-" ~ to!!! lul, :{Il ~ , , :~Ijl II!I':.!I '! I(~ "h,lI' 1"Pill' ,filII' htlllli llljil!! !HuH! . ! HI' ! . i i .1; }!lid I I II ;11 ;'1 " > 1," ,,- ill ~II I, I: ~lll ~lll -l~ Ii. ~ .il ;'1 ;11 }.I ~;- h.. h~ "I ~ I' I' ~ !' ;i ;lli ~lli ~!il ~i! ! , ! 4: . . . ~ ,II .I, ,I! 9 lli ~;" ~;. L - D z o " " ~ ~ !l dl ~ll mril ~lil ~!il . , , , Ii !;h Ill! ;1 I'. ,., ii' I L 11 1'1- ~ Ii ' I; Ii !il I, . D o J L D z o " ! . 1,!,1j'l!h h. ~::~ ~::$l ILL \ il 'Ii Ii M 2 iii Iii II Ii .il.' :z I ~ 11 z o ~ " ~ "' }- " z <{ ~ ~ " " , I )1 ! ,'1', i .~ "~i1 i - ''t . -1.- . ~~ ~ ~ ihh Ii ! I I ,,! I i "I I~!; III :11 I I ' e;!!, ell liE 'ii;, ~ ,i l! ~ I di! I; ~ ili- .lh1ii, Ii ! ' !! iI ~~ .....,.'"".~ _1<O....,~a.....,,"...... "..."''''-.., ."."...r"'I-xu ""->'<("'),2. ,.~,--, -, "" rn 6..,....~ld PU~I' 6"~''';''''3' ........: ";..~;~;~.~ i t H~ iTdO?SldOl SVHOHl 'J.<;; "''''_'''''lo'Vd~ .~{, ',;;IJ} SN"'1.,1 )...13:1"'S il.1I"1 " II ii Ii iiI. !I~r " . I l1 ! I ,I II - .----y-='-~,._-,.,--'-"~~''''---''.>"-<::'1- ~-,..r.:-__~;fcoC --'~ ~~ - I Jlt~! J_lt~.,J~)%f~'i~1 II I :-::, ~:~<~::~~'~'~:\:8.\,-<~\::~~~'t I ll~~ \jjJ · (~'.~"~~~5~i]K~~H'~~11~i.J:; ?. .....~. I! i I.t : I,:! IP?((l!I'i i 'i Iii 'i,~_~~j'~,.i,.~I..tl'J',;;!'j ,i ' ! II'! Le Ci!'i! if.0~:;lot!,;,r ~~ ~~ ~:ool/l~;'ooc! ;1 I.~~~:..~~_ :L-~~ --<".;o_c;;;]';~__, [:'1 !::' :'} z <( ..J "- Ii () () ..J IL (\ z () <l UJ III ~ UJ IL <(, III UJ- !!c ..J " 'I !iii ,!;- !:!ll I! j :11 ,! ~~ Ii ! !ill -.-' Ii !I:I ll':i la 1 i' ~_'--~. 'C~:::. ----= ~:~ :-" 111 II! m n !II!! ~ Ii ~'I'! i1 i ~ t . I I! .. .', ~-...- ,.",jOf . II I! I '1',1 ::.:.:1......-1.... '=~~~'~:~==:'Ji.',~.. fu~tl~;~~:..-~~i~...'I_ ..1 ili I,','! II 1; , $f~t ' '-':i~' 1~~I!: f'; ~ 1; ~ 1 5::r-..:;-- I _.....~....." i) It:; \ j" ~ t ..- ...),J, ",ell -""- [jjR'" 'j. -. ~io Iltt,J. '[1.7:/- ".A Zj ~ ilID'f=J "'llcl\.iWt i : [:oJ", 1 '" .""':.:.~~I~::,; ~. .-;. ,() liLl "', ri"" if'_."\l ~ '~ liLJ. :!ill :1'idt\I'ji~~~,I,P!! i ,," [~J~t ii' , ~' ~)t;;J'i'i.;:r!rr#t"~,f ' Jl I!'-.--.' ii"~ I!i. ..""1. !h " oi, "':"'ai;1f' II! Ii! Ii! Iii Ii' r " il aj i Ii ,!" foh I' ,. s , , ! " II ii Ii ~. H- il ; i ~g ~ f 'hl'll f'"I'UI 111'~ 11'1" ltl!lrl 1'!Piil ,l'ill' ,1,lIh i!ft'l!i mill' !Iill!:! . . . . . . III 001 III rg WI mJ . m, Wi II Wi .00 . m . ,,- .."..., >-< ~ j ;::J CIJ U C\l <r.: ril;:; ::q ::;;: '" P-. ril C\l I E-< <;;: Z ::c::;: <r.: u"' . -, ~~ p:: ;::J ~ ::c:~ g ii c.;.ur..~l': Z~~o..; 'II., ~ g l ~~~ ~O"''''6 111!i ~ ~ i~~~ o ~ ~~ili!~ 'AO .. v.J. 0 ~ c.;-~< P.. P:: I I rill'-< , :;J U2 0) ii!,'ll ;:::J -<:t:;S ~I!I !1 E-< ::;;: ~ ~,!'!i! P-. O~ ~ ~o; U ZE-< QU2 U II'i!l, , 3 .~! ~B!';'J 'l!i~;;:" ~J~i!~ il il II 1,;1 ;ill liIi~J ,~-.. ,'.r ~, .~_:--,,;--,._.:, ... III - " '/'1 _.: '11, . .!!' I 't/" :jil ,:'-.rn,,-.: ',t)-'! '.!'.' ',,' . ',' , if': . -.~~~~. -' I~.~., '-'" . "1i~:I ,- :1.;! '-;;:;;-J ." II , I Co : i ~ ~ : l;! '~l 'I " I, "I'!'" I ',.. :I! i~ ~i ~ ~~~ ~~~~ r, ~ ,,'i, 'IL!"'.:l!I', ~h'! i'!!, 'I'Th!.!.!!, "!', 1"'!'li !,!P"'ilI! !I,I. t... 1111 ~h t 59 ~11 !!I!I!!!!~!il!I!lli'i!!!!1 1111111111111!~ 1_1~1~1.]~I.I~Ivt~ I i i !!, ! I , . !I ,I:,! I ill'.I,I':I'il'! ii' '1!!~1 '/!'11!!iid, ,,! , · , , . Ii"" '.L "j) i j"" 'I ':' 9~ !?3 i~ "' . : 8 .~ .. " >l I""""'h'~-'.. I .:.} . ~; D<, ~';~"" ~~' 'n' 9' . 'c~%h.'lf ;". .,,:/!!~;. - . .""'C' --k;~- ~~~:-, ~-':.-" t- ! ~ " . ! II! :! I ! , " i ' c, ~ ii ~ t g~ :II> I Q r.: ; ~ I~ ;!I '! In: I Hi I N ~~ ~~ ~"'I/ :'.-~ ~ 11 IT.' t*= " , , u H ,~, , , ' !I: , . 'iiI 'ill "'j '" :~ I, II , ,-'. I, I!/ \ . i , ""--- .------- i $ ! ; , .I '--.; ~ t I it ~/'Y l f l I, ~ I' F " :ig c-i ., ' I 11 ~!! li!i.....~., . ~ ,~ 1[, , " !i II i. , i '. ! . I Is I i, ! i . I . , · U!! ! m~l: "'t!j..~ :s ~!!~ " ~'." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. tie" ~ '~ G Q I,. ~ l-~ ~~ I;) "~ ~ Iii " ~ 1" ~ ;~ I I ~ ~i ~I 11 i! ! , Ii il I: . I , J.. I 11 , I ' ~ ., I ' i ill II . i , ~ oj i I, 1 J ; i ! . ~" ! ~~ ~~ ~ e:;: ji I pi 'lOp1,..n""-tom-,_,~",, ..,._....""""''''''''11I1 _-:.=-",,0'.""'-'"' ~'-6_,'_'-o'-"" '" , , I G u~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ : )I!~ I WI~ << '~(i~ :5 :.;j~d ~ ~~~i ~ . . -<"~,-I ,iil,,,:o.,' '" "- \;, ~\~~' I\DI;< - II~\ I. i!! !i'\ . , I~ , s " , d. .. , I ~ ~. $ . -130_'11<"""01""'-'''''__ ""'"W<rI:L):i",_'*"'-<aJ.\;o " " . "" ., Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ E 9 o~i! ~r ~i i~g r~ ~~- S ~r~~ !~ I1L'i~ii;l~I~lIIi ~ i~--"i~ ~~~~~fi~~. PifEt ~H f~p~ ." ~~ ~:~H H~~~hHi ~H~ H~; I ',!o" illllHI 'B I' !!I!I!i:!;i,gll ii"!! 1'1' i!I..I!!~\'!!'11..!!:.,. jjl'!lliii,I'i'!iill!II~1111 II ! "i ,! ...... "... ~ , I .. g, ~- ge i ill i ;, ! I ,I i ~ ~I~ ! ~ ~ l "i li'", i!IHI!l!:!jd'iH i:. ;!ml!!!h " : ".~, 1 ~ "I OJ T ~ ~t:h~t'lab~id!~..." ~ ~ <r: Zs .....< UN ~ f:il:3 p.. ::s ~ 'F f:il , , ;- , ~ p.., ';gi~~ _ ~ _ l? p::: ~ ~l!!m ~'~l Z U....:l ~'''M , , P:: t3 " i. f-; 0 po; " ~ -..: g." ~ ~p.., 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 g !^:~I~E ~l?: ~: ; !::~ ::r: 'l' ig~i! ,,~ ,,," I" "; ~ SS~ ~ , ~'G.: "' Po.:I1 I I ( ! ~.~ ...., f:ilE-< ~ I , ~~~",. E-< ! ,I., ' '. ", ,. .. '!$V , ti lfJ C'1 . !i~l~ \ >~, ~F/",L~, ." [;""''1:,,,,,,, !l """" <r: C/] ~I'l" 'I "I~' ,', i", ,.. ~ ::S....:l ~ ;,,;;, , :1]1 , ; , \", '" \ , .; Ii ": u :;; ~ · n~ iI \1'" lltl!, ,:Cd ~\ II 8 ~~ ->~~~~ ~lo' II~' I. I, , ! ~ ! !! ~ i' i :1 il l~ Ld 'i!! Si~l ! I : , ! jl' ;, I, i. 'I I !" ~ I ~ ~! ~ ~ ~~ e~ I A ~ ~ . Ii II iI !H! I n II i!~rr I' t" , , , , ~~ ,~-.. ,'.r .~. H . ! . ! / 'y. ! t ~ j,'4 '-./ II I. , ;. i \ ! \. ~, ~ u i i '. 1- ~ ---:t-- .~9' i, ~ . ~ ci.. :: r 8 I i ~ ~ ~ ' . , ~Ii~ ! !~il; '~.l~ <>.: ~g~t! :5 ~iJt;j" '-' U a ~ ~ ~ " u . ts., >- , ~ G 2 Ii! ~ ~~~ il~ I!i Il~. I;~ "'i!i~ Q gll ~ III E-4k I, II & ~ i ~I I ~ i! I , inl I' !' . I i ~' i'l J ~ 'I! ' I !1I !I .! , " . b , I m;r, . ~~ (;3 ~ :t CI. i~ (';. "?it " .".... II i ~ ~ il! I ::l~ U ~ : ~ ~~ I ~I ..........,..,,"" <DIIlI"".....,....-'oI!O-'_' ""'_.........~ ..---------- ";'rojA ' ~""""'-".- N , >>C '-~,-" :. ~_"'c,. r 0.. ! '-' '-' i ~ ! I ' , . ~!I~ . I iN' 0' . ~.. '< '~,i' c, '5 i':!!~ ~e,Oi')<; [0 tl..!:ltij" ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ o . :s . >- \ h G ~ I" '"'~~ !Ok r i "~ I ~~ ~" !f Q !~! ~ Iii ~ I" ., I I , " II i . ! Ii .Ii II . " I ~ . ; ! . !I " 0 I~ " c ~ . ,.. . -~. ---- ::;1- " : d I , , . III') , " ' ,Iii I f!ll' I ~i ~ ~' 11 f' /r II y' IF , , , -- '-'i " I "-, . wg ;t-~~~i--~.:,j--~ ~:e ~l! ~ ~~ U! ----+~-'''~ ~~d~ '" Ii ! -" ''''! _..._--~-..:- . -::~-' ,jl I I <:'.('/.::1:;::;"91 c> 6'" "',I- ,.."J -" :& /;..-1""'0'-'\ ..' '~.". .~ ..,._....,,'''''1......''If~'l<<9\'~\~ tt, ':,\ ~\ ',- . "-.\" l- \--"\ l J:.1,. . , I;~, "\\_~~-.:.f;'~; qq~~>:~;\ \, -:'I'~ 15" ~> I . '- ':'," ,,~...~ - I! '~" c~ -\;;j'~,";i:i;~ .\~.. i.. ::. ~' \ ;:~ -<,I 11-' ,~:I~ .i\.\~[;;)_ 4"'.' ~~~~ ,-;I" ':-,;/.. Z <t ~ (l, ",""" ..J -' . ~I ~= 'C;:: c-;: .........,.] :.:...::J' ::""'lC- ~ < b ~~ , , P-. ;-::;; &:i -.-. [:il ~it: -<" U ~~ Z.v,,- l~~C 00,.. UiL",-: ~o~ 1: ~. ~ v' ii.1 :1) C ~:;: ~J~~ <:;: .",.... -= ::::::~ "--' ~ ..,...- ="<-. :: U} Q '7 ".~ <t ....:l -, ;..;~ ~i I!lb:;,;ll!l I. ill ~< o .... .; ',::> !. ~ ~, < ~ " ,. " h. ." ~ ~ ,._ F !: ,~~!;inii m!hLi:!;!lh ,<::,;' L ;!H!~l:~di! ;;;l ~::!;i~~1j:;m:~ i;; ;~i Iii I -~i/i/:; i \ \\\,\~~e,,'Ii'..0'e"I,"' ~@I~m[J III M l'I~ ~~q/ I ,#Jt* .' -~<-~~~-c..-~"< ' 'f [' -1 C I 'j;, I ~ l \ " ,L:' , \ " ~ i' I "'J " ~~ . .' , , r )'.~. o i7. ~ " o ~ ... " > < .'1 " '..--1 I ,,:" , , . Hi' . ;; ~ j i ~ ,'~ .~, :< .. : : ~ ~ ~ ~ : I ,," " , .~ :-.'---- " )' -,\; "', \ f: , , I "~,I i\ i' \~ ,. i. ( '"I fj ~;~~~!~!~ ~ H~~~~?t ~ \, \,~J illililill lill!ii!:!!! ,,' ~.' ,j" . j." og !il: I~~iji; . ~.~ ~.l.1! .. tn ~": : Zs "" . ' ~ <;;: r ~ ;~~:i \.I '"'1\.'; ~ 19;: '--' >>" L'" ~:t~l 9.~8: ..,;;., :'" :::; < , ~,_: :~~ , 2"8 t~Ei~ lo.;S::;l"- ii;iI:~<; l'c~g" :'"z. ~ "<.t::;i!il :;:~j!;i: (.c~I'i" ~ "Si ~ ~i i'~; ~~!' -I--""~ ~~~~~ WzG~'<8 ~'I.l~ ~~h~ a:o..~~l ff1~g~ .:!c ~U~ ~5~~~ 1[1] 1---.. II j i:i ~~. I : I ! I ~- I ~~ ~~ 10 H_ ~ ~ fc t ~ ~I~ !: .f.__" .. f I L~.~~i ~ 1 ~ ~.Za!, l <( .. - '.::;j f ~ ttl; I' :.q, I o ~:l' ~ -"~,:. . il; m E-~~' ; 1~lpH~1 .......A' <r: Z S ~ UN . , >LI '" ....... ~;;; Po; >LI N E-o.. ~ ~ ::c:;g Po; u...., ~ ~'" U :::>iii ::c:~ Z..Uo.. ~ ~ O>'lO U~<r:"" ,0-. ~O::r: 'u'-' ~ [f)::> Po; >-< 0 ........ O-.@ '" >LI >-< U [f) '" ifl <r: (I) ~ ~~ Z Ou ::c:<>: ~ E-P: ....:l~ [f) I 'I,j'!;'!i ~5J~~~h~ 'II ,ldl :! t !:~ j~~ll~ ~. ,,' "'I'll 1!!lliill'llh Iii'!!!!'.' iI!!i:'%I;i ;ljil!!il!l:il'l. ll!.i!'lil'! 'I h, ! ,pi.'''!!!' ,!.!M~ll,iil ~ "',;. - ~ . . ~ ~. _ _ ~n , t~~ ~~ ~ _ ~~~!2:~"X~X : ~.~ ~ ;::; . ",I" 'II!'M li!:I!!l lil!!,il 'II. 'I 'ill!1I i"I"il _'I'!I! lI~t!:~ ~~ ,;111115' ,il!,i;lii Ill!' . ~u~~!ni I If ... ,! ! I ; ~;~~~~i ~u,J.l I _~<"x"~~~;;~;,, ~~~ ~~~~~W~jm, " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; .di; ,~.i~ 1l81G" :3 ~~;d 2) i:3~h (J Ullilt;" ~ ~ ~ "- ~~ o~ ~G':l' IUUJ~C O~ii~~ lUo~d m~:o~ lIlwE~~ ~ 0 ~ ~~i(j w~Fi ~ ~511~~ . I I i I ! I I ! ill ,I J.I!1 ,j I ,'I 2 ' "'II 'j'!""" "Ili 1 I , g ,hli..ll il!ili Ii I!II !!ll!i i, I!! / ~ I )" i! III 1I11! I II i ! i ! ~ II !ldli. Iii il' ( II !! I S 11 ~~ ! ilillll'Il!!!l1l dlljllld:~II' i!!lll1j'! II L .. ~~'0a".~!~I!llh i!!hl i! i!'I! hi'! ..' "00'00080 . .. ! Ill! i o 0 . .' 0 filllllllmD IIIIHl Ofll _~c-- .,_..-',~~;:_;-".:;:.:::._^_~~_:;:;/'-' ..:..::.c,' .. _,___-_-"-..;::,_"01\<;<1--'. :~i~t~:~~~H~7~;ci~2i/~,~",,~1~ :~ :\i,1 ~~,~\, 'Fl'!".!' I!,':~.'::~~'),t~., ! i ~~~,i\'i';~i':" r~r ., _"I'"., , , _.?~(i\ii i' ' ,. ~'", i,'f.l.,',....., o'TC'1111:i/ ' ~!'''li': .-,' _It?^~ll\ I I~ '\1 I~\ ! -t,7'" ,~V' I' . ::-Wjl .,\,!!' ';;)1'+1,' . 1:1! I:. ~~.~t.:wr,"".! /\:j ~'.;'.! .i.i\I..:.; ii;~l'.'.'c:.fi.! ":.1,".:.111",'1 ~ " _I~' r ' I' .j! : 1- . "t:liikli Ii Ii: 'I ii~.;}j~(I/' iLl," ~1.1.1:.I.fi''i,t~'~:I.''''. .!!\ __id", (ij" ' . g i :1 ~ .. ',,7".z~"'I-- j:b : Ul l>,' f.(,~r,1il:lf111'1 Fil~r 1'1..' '" ::...,~lli }I< I ~!'<I - Ii '(~P"\"j'! III1 El . 'j ~i i"",.'.i(I.I,~il': . ill :,-:~~~il'II'<:iiJ~ ~! ,...~,.,. ..., ''i ~.Sj.~.i'li I'i/ ./f .ii 11,.'\ .I!i ('I,il\,1 Jr,.n.f'!'..,.,-.,' , ~'ii l' I 'tr,.. \ 'Y'}- li"<; I Ir 1 ': :;' "H' !l'1! .' I'.': ,!" ,..:"",,,~; \' [' i fpJ' !' I! ~Jlj/h ' n;, 'II!: :::" =~' /1 i, ~1' ~ ~-J. t . ,__ _,," - ~ I I ~ ~ -=-.:-T'F~ "i' ~.,.._.,i:1 - -;, ;,.. r r'/ ,~>> " ' I' I I,d 'r';(,;:;:.~""'.' ;!~~"'" \' I tTi "~I ':\ 1 'i ~ ' " , ; ~ 'r i! II ::1 ii '-"~' \ I I ( ~! S f! I:~ i Mi "I ..!.F u.ili',l:i III 'c !11~'1!'"1 ! ~': !llill,!U!! i! i , /, I),jlm:; ;',1i ~ ;,( '1;'1"1" ii I mii!!I,'li i; "';.1 i :' I~~~~gi~ ~~ ~ /11\1 I!l!!:i!h'~ I \' I ~ t. I: ': ~~uuJ~t::rr ~ F';' !!'!'ll,~l- ! ;f'/ ,!!II!!iill! i i Ii I r I ~ ., ~ i , }: ~\.- "I~i rm'l'" .,,'t.' ~8'! ~ J>'; ilPi~ '" I. *ik:::~ 1M H I ,"""'''' i~' p .' _ ~,\~{ ~!i1~ ~ ..A ..'. 0 ~i' \:':;,;~-: ~ ~ .v/ r-:l ~. ~ !!I l., . , i . ._'oM ~ ~ ,. ~n~ ~~~.~~h~~!~~ ft.~"_ ~.. ~ II ~ _. h , ,"j ~ ~~~g~H!~~,i3d31 _ h ~~ ~ . ~" 3U 33 ~~~ ..~~~ U333U i I ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ;! I i I l' I !!!;,!llkll,d lil'l l I. II; ~ ! l1li!hiihi!ili ill!!, dldi! i !!! - , ~. . l,,1! !IB!!lIP ,I! Ii I, e" '!' . 'd' l ., ~ II il'!; Ii! i": I'!;' S _,! ii' !'ll!!l!"! -! ,'- dd""l! Ill) , ~~' 11I1l, lll;l!il HI. dl!l!ilil! hi! I! lln j I! ii ~ ~~o0...e :,um'!ll! i I! ': I h! I:' rn ~ .. o,,,,'_io'" d. ," Ii <: ~ .... .' . 0 !iIIDilJUIU ".. ;=J o' ~ UN ~ ~ ~ ~~C;;;C-~\;;:j-;~.:~;~;~~:_~ " ". 'il!;! .... ~ ~ :'~;'r~TIFSjf;'~~:~:;~,"'~~=~~i) ;=J 0>:-' .' · " ::c 0: ;;:.;:',,\,' 'i\I.J \: I ! E-<.. U ~~. \,<, '\," \~! i" "i p) H ~ ,.>'\:i!~!f ' 1'\1\ '\ Jl 'Q"'-: ',..i.,.1.1".i....'..i.....'........~. LD c' f:: :r-ljl i I l:~" 3::c =:A\\:VI\., , \1\ I I U '-' Lf;J: Ie- I' (r " en. ~ <-''jJ~ji \ if Ji i : \ \1; , Of-( 0 ~-L",j'~f~~ h .:; - p-. 0>: -.' --'1' ,.", "-,,.. I U ~::z::: ~-'-I r,!,!JI\ 'i -il E-< _; t~/~ Ii \ ,; ,j U) C'J _.,yi.;...{~'\ \!; \i ~ I'~ \ r....l ~ ~~I~'...:I l ~ ~ ---...... (f] '1_,; _-JI-~'i ': ~ i ' 0, ::e: oj .'ill'llll' i",' ' o u __r:lj-'o" ~'f1 n ;. i ~ ~ ~ ~--f.~f;,l' ; ~I U t--< ~ t;A';~I!11 :~ I'il d \ 1 rl~' J;' U) - 'I" Q t;; ';~- ::Htl' I' I I' Z 'i.I"I) I" ;, ",1[:' I~~' II; IlL .-of IC.~ -> cl' .... \, ~ \ ~ ",." ~, 11<1 ~ 'lIT ~ ,'( ....:l _.' . .(i.,i.I!!;!:' ..1 I; 1'1"0 '_..':-'1"'1:~,1~ J^"" ~~:,! ; " _.' ; 1--0;"1; "' 1 if 'I t~.i~r~1.jt;li~ ~llii : Ii. ' r",-,,,",'(,!i!'ll)! ~ . :i =;, . I ~ ~ :~-)---JA: I t~: < ' i11~_ '"' i'll'" ,",~'j;' I Ijll, h~~~ ~~(~~ ~~ '. '- ~I~I' 11'1 I II I-;~ \ ~~~ ~~rh ~( I, Ip,o': f ~I!~ Si~~~;~ \ ~<: I, I I "~t. 11 i,,'~!li!I'!!""'l" 11,!1l ' ;1,; ,!, !;I!lii !lli.;;",' 'i 'I 'ijl ,I I l'lllljl' '! _J", hi I, !Il~j,..!l i'i ~,P"<"! !' / J<f ' 'i .f!Mlh!;lii~(I)' n i llllj"!-'-.!.' ~,." ~~n tl~ '" - r - l: l \;l~ ~ ,i ~". '""i ~ ~~~ r'l'~~ ~..,j'J I .". . ~~;\!i III!; ....-j ""0_'\ .>"--,, . . ~ ; " ,'" . f ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ Ii ..tjt.. ,~IlI~~ 88i1G" <:( o::~hg :3 ~~t!e 8 :g~li" " < Q ~ :J ~ ~~ 13. t:b~~j Ow~~~.. I";~ ~~~~~ m~~Ii~ a:~~~! (/)U)~i ~o~ii r:i ~le~~ ~ '!I!'M lij,h,l 10 ~~e .!l:l!!!! 'ill!nl i'!IHI " ,I, w~~~lIn~~ 11'.llrr! i"-I!" lillljilli '1IIIl" f ~~~~J! 1,1,- ~ n~~ " .. o~. :I~i~~i~!l! ~~~:ol~~!i ~ !.,I;I!!!! ~i~~llt~!t~~ 1"I/IH'l !i!,...lll "'-"1' ! i"i"!'"'' ,s'I"I'l "11,,"1' illlidli!1 i!ll:jlj"; "'" I. llill'I'I'!' ,!',,!.U!! ~ Ii: ~II ~ II hi., i [.) ~I~ ~ ~!~ ~ i!1 ! ~~. I I Ii! Ii! , " d jl ! , li!1 Ii; i'i I II -n j i II! I _ I I J' ~~ -<" iH ' ~. ! 0.; ~ "'2 ~~ i E~b! It ~ ~ [ ~~ ~~ ~, li:1 3~!11 ~. _8- E_/:'.!.':1 " SldH ~l I~~!;&~I IJJ. o z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I:Q ~ ...:l ~ :r: u '" E-- >z:l '" ~ ;:;;:(; > >z:l'" f> E-< '" "'" :;r:::2: Z u'""' o ~"" ~ ~~ E-- :;r:<< .......u'" ~~ r.. ~~HO .......~~ ~~p... "' ,~o ::<1 l--IC>.u0 ~ ~~ p...C>: ~ >z:lg: ~ (fJ '" <C ~U) > ;:;;:'""' f> ol'J :;r:c>: ~ E-< C': Z <l1t;; IJJ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E-- l __.il- I =. in ," ~~ ~" 0< ~~~ "0< ~"';: :2~:;; , ~~ o .' 'ji . S ~ . ~~ ~~ Ul " z I::i .., ~ ~ "' "' t: i<o z o E=: " ::l "' .., ~ '" :;j Ul 3 "' ~ . M . f ~ " I . > . ~ . jl!~ !8'~: "' .Jl~ S ~~d U (l}i:lt;" ~ ~ ~ "- g. ~t;~~~ ~~~g~ ~~~<i W<t~O'" ~~EIi~ a.d~. ~~loz! ::;:!i ij~ I . I I , , , 'I d II J I' ,ii!1 i ; . l'j III . I ! J III I . I i }, . l 1"(1""" ~ ", '! II, ~!;'~~ ~- I~ ~ i~ '. . I. ~I~!: "I 1'- hi., I \.) ~I~ ~ 08' ~ Iii ! ", ". . m~ -<' g~ ~ ~ !! & ~~ ; ~~~I! It ~ i ~ .::I"!'~! r !il! ~;;!I! ~ ~ II ' ~ ~'olj I \ ~ ,-; '""' I ~ g H& . ( . ~ I . . o -' i1 "- ::, ~ " !Ill mi I! ~l " , }i ~ ::, I: ~ 1'1 m .I <C '"""' :=> UN "'"~ ;;;S'" ","N I'-<P. ~ :r::::E lfl u... , Po; '" ...... :=>~ ':j :r:: ~ "'-4 uP. ~~ '"' _,""",0 <C'" ~ 0.. ::c: ~00 r~'~U~ ...... [/]0 L. ~"" L' o..::c: ...... "'"""' lfl (') [/] <CUl ::;:;1;;j 0'-' ;J::"" 1'-<0: !iil !Ii Iii z z ,Ill 0 0 E=: E=: :Iil :~I .." :;: ;> '" '" ,..., ,..., '" '" en ...1 ::l ~ ...1 '" '" ;.. '" ~ '" '" .." en '" 3 0 ;.. '" en --- '" ------~-': ;.. -.~--. " ;'. " .~ ::, ~'3iE " L;;~' =j - c ',' 1'1 ;JlIII;;!/,!!: =1'1= !ll ~Ii !,,' ~l'r= Ill.l! '.0];..' .<. ~ 0 , ;:n:m = ~ " "L. ~~E !~I ~I EE-:~~~- ; r ~. ;J. .~~;-~::--=;:_~: _=-' j~~ I'-< if) ~ ~ '" '" >' >' z z :'i :'i '" '" I I! I en !', ~ ::l .I ...1 <::.":. "' ,~~ '" ;.. '" "' Z .." '" en ;:i 3 0 . ;.. ~ en " ;'. ." ~ ~ u " !., ~ ,., ~I~ Iii I! ~ ~ iii ~ " ;!~ 'wi '-'8~ W lli I ~ .~~ ~~. ~"1 " f:::5 i ~ ~ ~I!~ ij~lIi~ 8t.;)~ g :5 '~!h 2 bll:l~.. "' ~ a i'! ~ ~ a., ~ 'I G Ft;2~i ~~~h wi3~~~ m~: .~ IIll.lJti~~ o.:~~r~ (I)()~H w~~ij~ ~",,! ~b~lI~ I I I , , I !I i! ! ',' ,111/ I ; i' j J !I 'lJ ! ! 11 J . I 9 , }, l ~ ~ l; ,., ". , O' , ~ . ~ ~~~! ! ~ ~ i; g$ ~'I ! l:t ~ ~ to ;!~9 ~:m ~i I~!H~I . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET R\D P\2004\04-0394 51. Thomas EpiscQpal\ST AFF REPORT.doc 8 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial -P!tO Lf - n ,7; CJ Lf f ~ .jJ1~ Consistent? 6@'CL/ jl n Consistent? Planning Application Number: ) 1. General Plan Designation: rrA r 2. Zoning Designation: 3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: 4. Environmental Determination: %l 10 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: I flf ! o o ~ D Consistent I General Plan EIR Sensitive Biological Habitat Map Sensitive Archeological Area Map Sensitive Paleontological Area Map Fault Hazard Zone Map Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map 100 Year Flood Map Future Roadway Noise Contour Map Other (Specify) Previous EIRlN.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): o ~ ~\-Su,v....Q ~t. 11..-ffoL ~ie.w(/....in)catf- tflM-'t G,eev.5f"""\ E"fi~ I Arp. rZ,"J-oOL.f). (2) beo~\v...Q ~ ~ Cmf~ Other: 7-12A- ~(f;'1Gt3tJJ /1'1) )/, ;;hoO, 7!-/6 ( Ov'-eref..j 1>\.n1.,lM.d M- ((.eN ~ Z/} ';gJ D o o o Exempt Mitigated Negative Declaration Negative Declaration EIR 20 Day Review o 30 Day Review Inconsistent o o o Land Use Circulation Housing R:\FORMS\ST AFF REPORTS\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercial.dot 1 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Consistent Inconsistent o o o o o o o as/Conservation Growth Management/Public Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development . I :& I ta to 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: .~ Site Planninq: o A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area. I character? JJvJ0~-. ~LI -,fp if. (rer/~( _~,"!:..!"!:.~'-&vJ 1<> "'"""f.f "7 f'Tc7 ;p~" ;C<<-4:J ~ ~ -~ ~~ "/ u / . . ~ I'f~ ~ 4..f- ~ 4: SI~ ~ )vY' ?I- S. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating h-e-Uldl nuisances and hazards? p{~ c14.ftv ~~ p,-., ~5 M{lr,5~fl<.te.~. ~h 5+ 4 ~~~" C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots . to define the street edge? fl..>-- ~ -'(-tf..L- t.c..J bI ~ f., -fiR ~k;://~ z;,~A ~ /^'~ -fcr~'" -h "'<- ~;t,l.1Nz ~ ~~' td5 Parkinq and Circulation::/ 1/ . '-'I ~. /~/A:;f5 ar (A.~rers~ A. How does the parking lot de~ allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate throug'te jarking lot, and exit the site easily? ,or>- y(~ ~ d/TveJ (Vi 0 ;e:: ~ d'- <J~ -~ ~ I'~ (1""'04-/ ~ ~,;& #c B.-l4ow does iti"e- parking lot design provide safe and convenient access 0 &",-<{cJ fVl;7S pedestrians and bicyclists? 7Y~ ~I ~~ ~ ~ c.-CG cU' ~~ ~ ""';\di"-1::'. ~I w~d.s>-- O<rllr'-' I~ / d~wl\. J C. How are tfle service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffere~ ~ from public view? ~~ -:Jvuz-e+t./"j I'-J In Vicki IAfi/t1 j;Jc;U/J l ~~ BuildinqArchitecture: -(v.e(!/5 5o/~ ~ !~,~. A. How does the building esign provide articulation of the building mass? . ~VuJ . ~~ I~ b~ ~ jli<d.f/VLtJtrwr wrftdOiAfS ow-& \)~I d R:\FORMS\ST AFF REPORTS\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.conunerciaI.dot 2 . r . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity -I. _ Withi~~~e~1.. ~~7~ ~( /lYLr~/ (,<./r~ :>J./~ ~{~ ~/{'" urVie-v1/ rOV( ~#/if~ 6.e.~~ ~,).~, C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or ~~ful _ _,L~ open spac between the buildings and/or the street? ~ ~ . - f t4~. . f1..L cu-..I ~ f ~<//\. I IJ~ ~ D. How do each of the architectural element (building base, windows, ~/ '7f./~ doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials ~.~ meet the intent of the design guidelines? ~ II . r o Landscapinq: A. ~s the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? ~ Yes 0 No, why? Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Year Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the design guidelines? 0 Yes If.J-. No - rvtf;;:; f'Y'j ~'J fo+- f(~-?~' r>e'OU f re-d C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and _ separate them from the~urr/nding pavements? 8'~ )L-Y~ ~F>-'j :;:t:;~~/}t'i~ ~?r~ :~r~ D. How Goes the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls an fences integrate f~..J-.. with of the architecture and landscaping? I .-f-wxf.-1 . ,~J10Q ~tf('!Lt,~.r~~~ ~~Jp?& 7. DevelopmentCodeconsi~~ ~~ ~ '1'~. A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? R:\FORMS\STAFF REPORTS\PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercial.dot 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Circulation: 1N-- -5 i{..e ~1'14 (~'1t2-M +~ /~ (/oJ)!/ he- Pvzrrn fv.;o - rl-cMJ~ ~ f roVfdJ- o.-<::ce4<J fr tA.e- Si:J<- Architectural Desiqn: ~ ~ 5ik s-fr--U!:f, . bul~/~/ vwd( cv<-+f~2lY7;",?,C/-e--S. Site Planninq and Desiqn: ~ ~ 5"c.JlLJ_ tvitt-. {'hoAA~ay< ~Y4 ~' (D{-; ()F"- :)p~ ~ {l> ~ ..-r ~ Compatibilitv: ~ /o.G -fw~ b-.0 (cIt~s -10 fJ ro vicUl ~. B. Does e application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: D Yes, with conditions ~ 121:C ~;aP to ~~ I ftv4~()Y1 ~!c!rf1r1 lRf.~ 1:5~. ri). / -UU3'.7'1ct<:- (,C,3)ol./l . d--'1jlC){ q ~~\O!r, , ~~~!~:i~~~el!itffii!t&~~ Hillside/Slope Traffic Arch.lPaleo Habitat Fault Zone Subs.lLiqfctn Flood Stream/Creek Noise Air Quality North East West South oS . R:\FORMS\ST AFF REPORTS\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercial.dot 4 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORTdoc 9 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0394, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 29,751 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH FACILITY INCLUDING A SANCTUARY, PRE- SCHOOL, PARISH HALL, MEETING ROOMS AND OFFICES. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 44651 AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 961-290-003, 004 and 005. WHEREAS, Mel Malkoff, representing The Episcopal Diocese of San Diego, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0394, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0394 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA04-0394 on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA04-0394 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA04-0394 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA04-0394 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 O.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The proposed project is also consistent with the use regulations outlined in the Development Code for the Professional Office zoning district. The project has been conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public . health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Professional Office Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review (Class 32 - In-Fill Development) pursuant to section 15332 of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. Section 15332 applies when there are no potentially significant environmental constraints on the site; the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; the project is located on a site within the City limits, which is served by all utilities; and the project site is less than 5 acres in area. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA04-0394 (Development Plan) to construct, establish and operate a 29,751 square foot church facility with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of March, 2005. . David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 Sl. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of March, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D Pl2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\20Q4\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0394 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a 29,751 square foot church facility including a sanctuary, parish hall, meeting rooms and offices. The subject property is located at 44651 Avenida de Missiones, generally located on the west side of Avenida de Missiones approximately 300 feet south of Highway 79 South. Assessor's Parcel No: 961-290-003,004 and 005 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Service Commercial TUMF Category: Service Approval Date: March 30, 2005 Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any R\D N004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 5 agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, . employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 4. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 5. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 6. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 7. External downspouts may be used at the applicant's option, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. . 9. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco (Main Body) Trim & Wrought Iron Windows & Doors (Metal) Glazing Roofing. #52 Ivory (Expo Stucco) w/Santa Barbara finish Mission Brown (Frazee #AC140N) Medium Bronze Bronze #562 Valencia (Eagle Roofing Capistrano S-Tile) 10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 51. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 6 . . . 11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 13. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 14. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector. check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 15. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 17. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 18. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 19. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be R:\D N004\04-0394 51. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 7 consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the . following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans. d. Detail of outdoor employee eating area. This area shall include a trellis with appropriate vines to shade the outdoor employee break area, decorative furniture and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. e. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. t. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 20. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. . Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by this Permit 21. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 22. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 23. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 8 . . . a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 24. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 951 696-3000:' 25. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. All site improvements related to Phase 1, including but not limited to all parking areas and striping shall, be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit for Phase I (sanctuary). All remaining improvements shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit for Phase II (parish hall). 27. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 26. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 28. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 29. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 30. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 9 Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 31. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 32. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 33. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 34. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 35. 36. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post- construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction- phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes tor Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as 'listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with storm water and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department ot Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the tollowing agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Planning Department c. Department of Public Works 37. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 10 . . . . . . 38. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 39. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 40. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 41. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. 42. A Parcel Merger or Lot Line Adjustment shall be approved by the Director of Public Works and recorded. 43. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. 44. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34Kv or greater, shall be installed underground. d. e. R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 11 45. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. . 46. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 47. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 48. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 49. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 50. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. . BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 51. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 ,Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 52. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 53. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 54. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 51. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 12 . 55. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 56. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 57. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998) 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. . 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. . Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays R:\D P\2004\04-0394 51. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 13 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 71. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan subrnittal. 72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a rninimum fire flow for the rernodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assurned sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection rneasures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all inforrnation as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 73. 74. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-IlI-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrant, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet frorn a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 75. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 76. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 77. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minirnum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 78. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 79. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 14 . . . . 80. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 81. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 82. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 83. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 84. . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 85. . Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 86. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) . 87. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 88. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 89. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. R\D 1'\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 15 Special Conditions . 90. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions 91. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 92. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 93. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 94. All landscaping, including the area within the ROW, monumentation, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 95. The developer shall pay all costs for streetlight relocation. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits . 96. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 97. The developer shall provide all documentation necessary, including legal description (metes and bounds), to dedicate by grant deed the triangle section on the southwest corner of Lot 5 to the City for trail use. 98. The developer shall obtain all necessary approvals and provide all documentation acceptable to the City tor the easement required on the adjacent City owned open space parcel. OTHER AGENCIES 99. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 14, 2004 from the Rancho Calitornia Water District. 100. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 15, 2004 from the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. . R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 16 . . . 101. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 8 from the Eastern Municipal Water District. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\Draft Reso & COAs.doc 17 @ Rancho Water BoardofDiredors John E. Hoagland President Csaba F. Ko Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake Lisa D. Herman John V. Rossi Officers; Brian J. Brady General Manager Phillip L. Forbes Director of Finance-Treasurer E.P. "Bob" Lemons Director of Engineering Perl")' R.. Louck Controller Linda M. Fregoso District Secretary/Administrative Services Manager C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel June 14, 20t... Stuart Fisk, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 f~!~S~:~':--:~T~(:::;7 f'/'!/':""'?"/ JU^' ;i-,! )1 __ ,if; ,- , :' f " iJ Z004 If ID:I . ! _.1 ~ -" ~' SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY ST. THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH TEMECULA PARCELS NO.3 THROUGH NO.5 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 29132; APN 961-290-003, APN 961-290-004, AND APN 961- 290-005, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. P A04-0394 Dear Mr. Fisk: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. . RCWD owns and operates two water transmission pipelines within the subject property. A 20-inch cement mortar -lined and -coated (CML&C) steel pipeline lies along the property's southerly boundary within a 30-foot easement and connects to a 16-inch CML&C steel pipeline along the westerly boundary, which is within a 25-foot easement. RCWD requires that these pipelines remain in service at all times and that open ingress-egress access is provided for the maintenance of these pipelines. No permanent structures or trees may be placed within the RCWD easements. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Mich el G. Meyerpeter, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 041MM;at070IFCF . c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road. Post Office Box 9017 . Temecula, California 92589-9017 . {90g) 296-6900 . FAX (909) 296-6860 o CGJNTY OF RIVERSIDE . HEAL1_' SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HIEALTH . June 15, 2004 JU/V 1 '';~I.C.,I ,., 1.'1 ; .~_, :! i j lilli ',':I,lj o 2004 i}/ i.! il!" Uj ~J ",."_i City of Temeeula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Stuart Fisk i @y- RE: Plot Plan No. PA04-0394 Dear Mr. Fisk: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0394 to construct a 12,768 sg: ft. parish hall and a 16,953 sg. ft. sanctuary building and has no objections. Water and sewer services should be available in this area. . 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. Sincerely, Martinez, Sup rvising Env (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. . Local Enforcement Agency. PO. Box 1280. Rive,side, CA 92502-1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX (909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering. PO. Box 1206, Riverside, CA 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor. Riverside, CA 92501 Board of Directors President Richard R. Hall Vice President Randy A, Record Rodger D. Siems David J. Slawson Ronald W, Sullivan Board Secretary Rosemarie v. Howell General Manager Anthony J. Patk Director of the Melropolitan Water District of Sl1. Calif Randy A. Record Treasurer Jos..:=ph J. Ku..:=hkr. CPA Legal Counsel R..:=Jwine and Sherrill . EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT - SINCE 1950 ~ June 8. 2004 City of Temecula Planning Department PO BOX 9033 Temecula. CA 92589-9033 Dear Colleague: Re: SAN53-Sewer Will Serve APN 961-290-003, -004,-005; St. Thomas Episcopal Church, located south of Highway 79 South on the west side of Avenida De Missiones EMWD is willing to provide sewer service to the subject project The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules end regulations. EMWD expects the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMWD expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility construction, inspection. jurisdictional annexation. and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's New Business Development Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service, and to receive direction on the preparation of a facility Plan-of-Service. which is required prior to final engineering. . EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions. such as water shortages, regulatory requirements, legai issues. or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777. ext 4447. Sincerely, . L'i .' c?-e& ~~=---'- Fred Azimie Civil Engineering Associate II New Business Development Dept FA/jw . Cc: Temecula Engineering Consultants - Stanley Heaton Mailiag Address: 'P~fE/filS~rf,,~'&~~r~~~'9~~'7?tJ~~'r'M'Ng6r2t3~rR?rc<j1'9(9) 92X-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177 Locution: 2'270 Trumble Road Pen'is. C/\ ()2570 Internel: WWW.~fllwJ.()f!.! . . . ATTACHMENT NO.4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT) R:\D P\2004\04-0394 $1. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORT doc 10 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0605, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A STATE LICENSED PRE- SCHOOL FOR UP TO 92 CHILDREN AT 44651 AVENIDA DE MISSIONES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF AVENIDA DE MISSIONES APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NOS. 961-290-003, 004 and 005. WHEREAS, Mel Malkoff, representing The Episcopal Diocese of San Diego. filed Planning Application No. PA04-0605 (Conditional Use Permit), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law. at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony. the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections 17.04.01O.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed church facility is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. A religious institution with a private school facility is a conditionally permitted use in the Professional Office (PO) zoning district. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses. buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses. buildings or structures. R:\C U P\2004\PA04-0605 St. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 1 The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the . general plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed church facility and private school against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed uses will be compatible with adjacent residential uses with conditions of approval. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the development code and required by the planning commission or council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the Professional Office (PO) development standards identified in the Development Code and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed church facility and private school and found that it will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before . the Planning Commission or City Council. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review (Class 32 - In-Fill Development) pursuant to section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15332 applies when there are no potentially significant environmental constraints on the site; the project is consistent with the General Plan designation and zoning regulations; the project is located on a site within the City limits, which is served by all utilities; and the project site is less than 5 acres in area. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application PA04-0605 (Conditional Use Permit) to establish and operate a state licensed pre-school for up to 92 children a 44651 Avenida de Missiones with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. . R\C U P\2004\PA04-0605 St. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 2 . . . . Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30lh day of March, 2005. David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30lh day of March, 2005, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\C U Pl2004\PA04-0605 51. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\C V P\20D4\PAD4-0605 51. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0605 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit to establish and operate a state-licensed pre-school for up to 92 children at 44651 Avenida de Missiones, generally located on the west side of Avenida de Missiones approximately 300 feet south of Highway 79 South. Assessor's Parcel No.: 961-290-003, 991-290-004 and 961-290-005 NA MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: NA NA Approval Date: March 30, 2005 Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project General Requirements 1. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No. PA04-0394 (Development Plan), unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use permit. R\C U P\2004\PA04-0605 51. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 5 3. The applicant shall comply with the Statement of Operations for the project dated March 1, 2005, on file with the Planning Department, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. 4. Regular hours of operation for the pre-school facility shall be between 6:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M., Monday through Friday each week. 5. The outdoor play area for the pre-school shall not be utilized before 8:00 AM., Monday through Friday. 6. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 7. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\C U P\2004\PA04-0605 St. Thomas Episcopal Church\Draft Resolution & COA's.doc 6 . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.5 OPERATIONAL STATEMENT R\D P\2004\04-0394 St. Thomas Episcopal\ST AFF REPORT-doc 11 . . . STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS St. Thomas of Canterbury Episcopal Church 44651 Avenida de Missiones March 1, 2005 Hours of operation: Varies, but includes a state licensed pre- school operating from 6:00 AM to 6:00 PM, Sunday worship services beginning at 8:00 AM and ending at approximately 12:00 PM, student ministry on Sundays from 6:30 PM to 8:30 PM, men's ministry on Mondays from 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM, adult class on Tuesday from 4:00 PM to 5:30 PM, children's choir rehearsal on Tuesdays from 6:30 to approximately 8:00 PM, Wednesday worship services from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM, adult choir rehearsal on Wednesdays from 6:30 PM to approximately 8:00 PM, bible study on Wednesdays from 7:30 PM to 9:00 PM, and daily prayer from 7:30 AM to approximately 8:00 AM. Number of employees: 17 Number of required parking: 134 Average daily peak trips generated: 115 PM peak hour trips Type of equipment or processes used: none Description of hazardous materials: none . . . ATTACHMENT NO.6 SCHEDULE OF WORSHIP, PROGRAMS AND OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES R\D P\2004\04-OJ94 51. TIlOffiaS Episcopal\STAFF REPORT.doc 12 . . . .___,_____~_.__,....._ _,,~ __.. .,.._~. ...._ .......__ c. . .,~c _~""_"-__.~_,,___,,,.~~,__,,,_ "'_ ..',__,_, ~-'-. ,_. ,_",_'~"_"_ ,___'h.~..,,"~__"_ _.~_'. ...._....._..__. . w___"__'.._.,. __"'_'_._'_"_'___.__..__"'-'''_'''~'''-''__'_"''_'-_''-__'~~ .. Table 1. Schedule of Worship and Programs No. of Persons Facility Location Occurrence Day ofthe Activity Phase Build Week Phase One Build Out Starting One Out Time Duration 292 386 8:00 am Sunday Worship (Ine!. (incl. Sanctuary Sanctuary 9:30 am 1 hour Services each Choir) Choir) 11:00am Sunday Student Ministry 130 250 Sanctuary Sanctuary 6:30 pm 2 hours Monday Men's Ministry 50 250 Fellowship Fellowship Hall 7:00 pm 1.5 hours Evening Hall Tuesday Adult Class 12 20 Fellowship Fellowship Hall 4:00 pm 1.5 hours Even Ing Hall Tuesday Children's Choir 0 20 Fellowship Hall 6:30 pm Varies Evening Rehearsal - Wednesday Worship Service 50 150 Sanctuary Sanctuary 5:30 pm 1 hour Evening Wednesday Adult Choir' 12 40 Sanctuary Sanctuary 6:30 pm Varies Evening Rehearsal Wednesday Bible Study 50 150 Sanctuary Sanctuary 7:30 pm 1.5 hours Evening 1st Friday ot Couples 20 50 Sanctuary Sanctuary 7:30 pm Varies the month Fellowship Church Staff Admin. 8:00 am - Mon - Fri (Full & Part-time, 3 5 Offices Admin. Offices 5:00 pm 8 hours Work Week) Mon - Fri Pre-School 73 92 Children's Children's 6:00 am - 12 hours Students Facilities Facilities 6:00 pm Mon - Fri Pre-School Staff 5 12 Children's Children's 6:00 am - 12 hours Facilities Facilities 6:00 pm Daily, except. Daily Prayer varies varies Pastor's' Pastor's Cont. 7:30 am 0.5 hrs Sunday Cont. Rm. Rm. ~"__'_'h"..,_...,..-_ "".'___.'"'--"_~'~'.'-''-_'''~~~~='''''-"~_:'''_''_~_'_.~____ "" . Table 2. Church Ministries Accounting Ministry Adult Choir Adult Ministry Bible Teaching Book Store Ministry - limited due to space Children's Choir Children's Ministry Christmas Sharing Ministry Church Picnic Clothing Ministry - limited due to space Communion Table Ministry Counseling Ministry Discipleship Ministry Family Development Food Ministry - limited due to space Group Choir Hospital Ministry Hospitality Ministry . Hostess Married Couples Ministry Media Ministry Men's Fellowship Ministry Mission Outreach - limited due to space Music Ministry Nursery Ministry Praise & Worship Ministry Premarital Counseling Ministry Public Relations Ministry Singles Ministry Sunday School Ministry Traffic Control Ministry Transportation Ministry Tutorial Ministry Ushers Wedding Consultation Ministry - limited due to space Women's Fellowship Ministry Young Adult Bible Study Young Adult Ministry Youth Choir Youth Ministry . Ministries to be added at the New Church Facility Community Development Ministry Community Meeting Space Community Outreach Ministry Community Recreational Carnival (children-oriented) Finance Planning Ministry Handicapped Ministry Senior Citizens Ministry Wedding & Banquet Hall - 1 I I _,.......,_-:..-..._."...~.~~~;__.~,___."."-'"""_..~,.~~~,-.L."--~-"~:~._.,_.,_,.....",.c'_-'-,.~ . . . Table 3. Typical Outdoor Activities Day of Week Activity Starting Time Duration . Sunday . Easter Sunrise Services 6:00 a.m. 2 hours (patio/courtyard - 100 persons) Varies July 41h Patriotic Picnic 10:00 a.m. 4 hours (50 persons) Sunday Fail Ministry Fair (booths, tents, and other 1:00 p.m. 4 hours exhibits representing a variety of ministries at the church), September (patio/courtyard - 200- 350 persons) Saturday Fall Harvest Festival and Outdoor Crafts 8:00 a.m. 12 hours Festival, October (on patio/courtyard, and basketbail court - 200 persons) Sunday Blessing of the Animals, October (on basketbail 2:00 p.m. 7 hours court - 20 persons) varies Children's Christmas Craft Fair 4:00 p.m, 4 hours and Live Nativity . ITEM #6 . . . . . Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 30, 2005 Title: Associate Planner Prepared by: Matthew Harris File Number PA04-0525 Application Type: Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CECA: (Check One) PA04-0525 a Development Plan to construct two single-story retail buildings totaling 26,470 square feet respectively within the Creekside Centre Shopping Plaza on a 6.3 acre site located on the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane. (APN No. 921-810-025) ~ Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial ~ Exempt from further environmental review 15164(b), Addendum to Previously Adopted Negative Declaration R\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: McArdle Associates Architects General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Commercial Parking Lot Future Commercial Commercial Lot Area: 6.27 Acres - 216,691 Sq. Ft. Total Floor Area/Ratio 26,470 Square Feet/12% Landscape Area/Coverage 88,652 sq. ft./41 % Parking Required/Provided 188 Spaces Required (Includes Future Building Pad)/ 189 . Spaces Provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~ 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ~ 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-wide Design Guidelines, and the Development Code. In January 2003, the City Council approved a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to change the land use designation and zoning of the project site from Business Park to Community Commercial. The current owner, Davcon Development is now proposing to establish a commercial shopping center on the 6.3 acre site. "Creekside Centre" will consist of two retail buildings totaling 13,235 square feet each and a future developable area on the north end of the site which the owner intends to develop as either one or two dine-in restaurant pads. All on site parking and pedestrian improvements will be constructed along with Buildings "A" and "B" in a single phase with the restaurant(s) and surrounding hardscape to be constructed in the near future under separate approval(s). . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland JI\ST AFFREPORT.doc 2 . . Staff worked with the applicant to achieve a variety of project enhancements including the application of decorative stone veneer on both the building tower elements and arcade wall as well as additional articulation on the east elevation of Building "B" which is visible from the public street. In addition, enhanced landscaping treatments were added on each side of the main entrance into the center. The developer has also agreed to augment and further enhance the landscaping treatments at the corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane at such time that the adjacent restaurant pad(s) are developed. Moreover, staff worked with the applicant to achieve enhanced pedestrian amenities including multiple pedestrian plazas and decorative parking and pedestrian lighting. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site Plan The main entrance into the center will be located along the eastern property line off Nicole Lane. A secondary driveway and associated loading space may also be established at the southeast corner of the project site off Nicole Lane depending whether or not Nicole Lane becomes a public street in the near future. The property owners association in which the site is located is requesting that Nicole Lane be dedicated to the City. If the street is dedicated, the Public Works Department will not allow a second driveway to be established. Therefore, two design alternatives are provided on the project site plan, one with secondary access and one without. Should the second access point be deleted, the second required loading space will be relocated to the southwest corner of the site. A minimum 8-foot wide pedestrian walkway will be constructed across the entire length of the front building elevations and a seating plaza will serve to connect the two retail buildings. A centralized pedestrian corridor will traverse the parking lot between the two proposed retail buildings on the south and the future restaurant pads on the north. Two parkettes will be established within the parking lot area along the pedestrian corridor which will allow patrons to sit and wait for available seating at the restaurants within the center. Architecture A contemporary architectural style has been utilized for the two retail buildings which are connected by a pedestrian plaza and an arched arcade wall. The fronts and sides of the buildings will incorporate a variety of offsets and pop-outs to prohibit a box-like appearance. The flat roofs proposed for both buildings will be enhanced with a decorative cornice treatment. In addition, multiple tower elements with decorative barrel vault or hip roofs will be utilized to further . break-up rooflines. Metal canopies are provided at shop entrances for entrance identification and formality. Materials/Colors A smooth textured stucco siding and decorative stone veneer will be utilized along with a metal standing seam roof on tower elements and building entrance canopies. Four different colors will be used to differentiate between the body of the building and assorted accent features. Decorative light fixtures will be utilized on the building and within the parking lot, pedestrian access and landscape areas. Landscapinq . Landscaping has been provided between pedestrian and parking areas around the perimeter of the buildings. Accent trees and shrubs have also been provided on both sides of the main R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland Il\STAFFREPORT.doc 3 entrance into the center, around pedestrian parkettes and at the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane. Numerous trees and shrubs have also been provided around the . perimeter of the project site. Decorative paving treatments and outdoor furniture will be incorporated throughout the center. Six varieties of trees will be provided onsiteincluding Queen Palms, Camphor Trees and Crape Myrtle. In addition, eighteen varieties of shrubs will be planted including Abelia, Purple Fountain Grass and Society Garlic. Potted plants will be provided along front building elevations and at pedestrian plazas for accent purposes. ANALYSIS Parkinq The project conforms with all applicable onsite parking requirements as defined in the Development Code including loading facilities. The parking requirements were determined based on both proposed and future uses throughout the entire Creekside Centre property. The following analysis is provided: Proposed Retail Buildings "A" & "B" ~ Future Restaurant(s) - 26,470 Square Feet 10,000 Square Feet The Development Plan requires 1 space/300 SF-GFA of retail space and 1 space/100 SF-GFA for restaurants. Based on the proposed retail and future restaurant uses, staff has determined that 88 parking spaces are required for the retail uses and 100 spaces are required for the future restaurant (s). A total of 189 spaces will be provided. Should the proposed and future onsite . uses change, the proposed size or intensity of the specific use must conform to applicable onsite parking requirements. Site Plan The project site is not accessible on three sides due to topographic and drainage channel constraints. In addition, the location of the main driveway access off Nicole Lane is mandated by both its distance to Overland Drive and proximity to the driveway across Nicole Lane to the east. Given these factors and the developers desire to achieve building visibility, the resulting onsite parking area is irregular in shape. However, staff has determined that the project site plan conforms to all the applicable development standards in the Community Commercial (CC) zoning designation. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements. In addition, target floor area ratio and lot coverage requirements have not been exceeded. The Public Works Department has reviewed the location and design of the secondary access off Nicole Lane and has determined that on site circulation will not be significantly impacted should the secondary access not be provided. Buildinq Desiqn Staff believes the design and architectural style of the retail buildings are consistent with applicable provisions of the City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. Staff also believes the buildings are compatible with existing surrounding development including the shopping center to the west which is under the same ownership. . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc 4 . . . Landscapinq Staff has determined that the conceptual landscape plan, as conditioned conforms to the landscape requirements of City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code with regard to plant quantities sizes and spacing. The developer has indicated that additional onsite pedestrian amenities including such improvements as a water feature or outdoor fireplace will likely be added within the "retail plaza" along with tables and chairs once the needs of specific abutting tenants have been identified. In addition, the developer has agreed to augment and enhance the planting features at the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane in association with the development of the future restaurant pads. Until that time, this area will be landscaped in accordance with the proposed conceptual landscape plan. This has been made a recommended condition of approval. (see Condition No.6) Siqnaqe The applicant recently submitted a draft sign program for the Creekside Centre. The program is currently being reviewed by affected Departments. Staff has included a standard condition requiring that the sign program be approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The City Council adopted a Negative Declaration in association with the land use designation and zoning amendment from Business Park (BP to Community Commercial (CC) in 2003. Based on the proposed project description and associated additional information, staff has completed an addendum to the previously adopted negative declaration. The addendum incorporates minor analysis changes in association with two resource categories including Air Quality and Transportationrrraffic. The addendum concludes that the proposed project will not result in any new impacts to either of the resource categories. Therefore, staff recommends that the Commission determine that no supplemental environmental review is required. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed retail buildings subject to the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other City ordinances. The plan to develop the retail center and two retail buildings totaling 26,470 square feet is consistent with the Community Commercial land use designation contained in the General Plan. Moreover, the project conforms with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. The retail center is properly planned, designed and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The R:\D Pl2004\Q4-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc 5 project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law . and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to occupancy, City staff will inspect all construction. The site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 2. Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 8 3. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 9 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 4. Previously Adopted Negative Declaration - Blue Page 10 5. Addendum to Previously Adopted Negative Declaration - Blue Page 11 . . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc 6 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\STAFFREPORT.doc 7 iliH! J "'. '!! ", ~ _U~ [ill' ~ ! I . !l.~ ,I- '@!, '" V) YlfD3l\lll -"""""") l?llNlJ ]Q/S>lH?lJ !.IIIIII !i!iJ ,I I !iillllW III I Z . :s t{ ~ ~ !! I '= I ~ q .,...- !<( I ~ z'. -,.-~- '~''4"\-\~o~" /I )4\\ I !III~ '''':z: ~ ~ ''l,\._ / h '. .~, L~--~__ 'j/h 'ili "o..!('; NICO!, ",C . - ",00- ~~ _ .:;., nr~--l I l./'6';/:R.. " 1,1'11 . t!: j ;;z - .-,- ~--- I' ./ I ~ ".- I. ",\..oil!....... -'=''''- ~ - ~ -==- - .- -=--~::::'=:'::-_-'--:-~::"--rl:-- .f' c , I... 1 " 0 II t o~~lll ~ II , - """".1 ' i , " I 11 1 \ I' :s' f) :::> u ::.:::: ~ ..u ~ / ..u I- ~ ...J II " ~ .. ..... -... " !I i. 11':-,', ' j'i; 11 ___ ~ ~~~ --l <:( '...) ::l<::: ..w ~-< ~~ J2 '...):;;;! u = :s- ::> ~~ Zi::5 <:(>- --l ::l<::: ..w > J VJ V1fDlWll 1~lNlj1Ol5)flJ8J " I ; 'I I I!. '~ ' , 1 " I. j ii, I ~ :1!,.IIW II I'lg LI~ ~)~ li~I!II~1 ~. III!i! t ~ __~~~.;t_~ _~___~___::.._:~ __ . :v -'="oc -II ,'" , , 9\\ .~QJi II , , ^ ~ " , . ! ! , , . . , r-: 1< I '" " :>- \S ~ " v, \) ~ rE: i:; ~ ,. e z".o ~.~ ~ ::s 1 0.., ~ ~ i . v, . . C- . VJ YlnJll'ill ~ lIfflIW)) l~/lNlJ laI5)111~J . 'III i :ljlu II I ! , i~ !l . i~ ~ ~ ~ Cl I 3 II~ 15i <:( '<""-: l~ 1<:( o hi o ;<~<i<> ',-:',; <." {$i~{ \\' ~ '" \) 't \) r;: I I i I ~ I ~ I'@ \\ I , o \ \ , \ \ \ @ " \ 1\\ ~ \ \\\ 1\ \, \~\ " , \'\ \, ~I \ It- V\ ,I, \ ~ '\\ , \~ \ II , \irt; \\' ~ \\\ - V.\ \ \~\ ~ \ ,.:<:c \\\ S< \\Ie " '" \ :2 . ~, ~~ ",1 I , il . . ~ , 5 . , , , \ I "% \~\ ,. 'I .,;.;~, @i @"% flIt J..J ..\ :l:::::: !ill ~ "-, '< 7 \' J..J ..J <( Z J..J "" 0 0 :) W- I :::; ~ <( n u -" 0 ,L, :s- I " ~! J..J ~ " J..J U 0: u.J :l:::::::;: '" ",! -e I Id ;;Sl , ~ ' "I il !!it ~ti . ~I Ii Ii ~ ~ ,3 . II i,!ii ~ i!liuh~ , VJ Y1IDJI'ill ~""""^,,l l~lN1J lO/5>EmlJ ~~ i I' '-I I I ! ~ 'J ~ J D l;,j I IJ5i co .....-: p;: . ; !~ , I' (.-))jl~"""" ',-, ~~l I' . " ~),~J(~ ) , till ill!;l \\ "" / "N~r-''--'.J\/ \ ~ ~ ll; 'Il' ;~ 111 -j !! ~I! 'l')'~':,:~. 'I "\\ ~II.~;' ( ~~; ''77~__(' It- 6 :2: '<Jilt"'\\'" /,\~-...;: Ii; i':: 0 ):::-..J{:: 'f'<:r,~ :~ :2: ~ 6 ::s .... :;: ~ "-i "" "" "". ~ ~, ~ tri tri. tri ~ ~l ~ ~ 0< ~ ::s cJ Ol I ~ ",,' I . l u9G ~l , r " ! I , " 'qi I! ~~ '=~=' ~ I . ,-.- .-.- , N ~'f ,~ I i ~ · i ~I , ! I , " phi. i;! I I , .-.- :2: , ::,; 2"hl "W. ~ .-.- ~ ~ I .... ~ UH ~ii~ ~U ;=~=: ~ I tri " "" ..... ~ (5 ; tri , ~ ~l e: " " :z: ~I :z:l 0< u U .l---- ,,;;_,~ '."'1 ::s ~' ~; a d ~,. ~i "" I Gl ~ i .~ ( , i "", ~ ..J 0<' :::: ~ ! osl .. ~5 i L t~ .0 t;J i -r ir, ~ a:; <I <" ~ h~!1 ;::: ~ ..J m' tri 3~ . " ) ;,..l;? . .... ~ Cl ..: r!' a5j z 11~~p ~! ~ ..J "" ..... :z:' 0 " "< < ~l :::J u... .~.i ~ ~~ ~i . :::; ihl ! '"-, ..: .~ , ") u . ~< ~l '" . Vi ..J ::> , !Q ..J u ~ u :::: "" ;;z I . II 6 . ~ DJI ,L ) "" rl !I I ~ mill 1'1 Ii 6 I- @' <;; At ui .' .~',~ ,I II :;: I .... , ~ ~ I ,~ ~ " "~~i lli ~ ~d "<I :2:; I, .I~ i ~. ~l ~il . t .~ ~i ~,' ,cr~';-J ~ i ~, ,,, .L",t v:;! Ii I ~ , I' z < Y.J VlrDlWll :~:L I :s j I <:; .- ~ CJNV1IW)} IN J lOI5)/IJ~J '1'-'8 1 ll~<i 1< . 1/ z r I I 2 I,ll ,I ~ II li!H~lil i~ ~ n I ~ i7 I ,g Ii -1J I .rd ~7 z ~~ I ~' ~i ! ll/!': L I I' oj '1":"11 ~ lj 'i.l!d II ~ ~! il'I~!llil I ! II' ,". , i7 ~ ;'!~:ii,llli . ; U~. q~- 0~. ill "i ,IOP,j, IIp.f;'llllii 1111 I 1 ~i~I~! !i!:i!! =1 $ I I ; ;1 i7 I ! . ! , . . ~ . I D 'II I ~ I, - "I I , ~ 1:'1 I I . ";' I iii' pill - , ill!i !!ili i i! I 0 ! '"l. ! Ii. -"C" eeeeee000@ " i7 /I @l' . l 01 " /I - I. I i7 @ . l , 0 0, 0 II I' " u . - N ~ ~ ~ II.: <( " D $ I' II: ! '" ft ~ , II '! ~ % Y.l YlIDlWll p (tMllAO) l~IlNlJ laI5)/11~J ;I~~l~ ~ ~ ~~ o 0\ I @ . , 97 - " < I !. I i~ @i " II - 01 I I , I ~~ gi ~~ ,. o ~ i~ s' ~ $ I I =~ Ill~~ c:o ..- .C".i 1< " '4 z . . .. , ~~! I ~ IUI~~I! ill Ii . , .~ li ~! .,,11 II !.j I 'I !Ill ,'I I I:; 'I!' lid!,I' hilll!!, ! Iq~h', ~,.!ij'il,!!li . i ill.. . ,,', ill"i"I"ll.l: ll'II.I!.ii Ilii ,j~h!h;!lil! . I I 'I' Jj II', ~ !~I ! ':'1 ilI'JIli1d J!! ! II Ii II i I ! 'I !I!!. !Ii. ~ eeeeee000@€ . ill.: . ,I' " il '. . ~~ /In / I / I III iii mu _""....,r. ~~ VJ VlIDJWll ~ tJMlB.\Ol JlIIND lGIS>I31?JJ , , Ii , , , I _____ , e-l! , i L I ' ~' I i / 1 +---e , , ~ , , , , ,,.. , L _-_-~"_.-_-~::__-__ _-_ -_-___~ __-..: : , , , , --0 z o (5 ~ ~\ .; <:); I ~i e--ri \ , , I ---------- I 0------ .. : I t ~!' " : I: ~ ~ :: it: ill ~ I In ij ~, i L~1l1T~ '1 I : " I I : e--i-I ' , , , , T-0 , , , , , ~ :~: !~ I 'I z I ~ 1:3~:5 ("'o'j e z.. Q.. -<( I i I~"O I 1~:c2 1 !!l -,,' r 2: ~ "- a a '"' i l i iil i" I j, : :, ~; ! i!~>!~; ~i!!i l2 ." ! I "" 'I '11 '1" ~ II ; ill!! :1 hid: '<' I 111!!!!lj!!. il ; 1;/ Ii Ii es . "l ! III I l 'I I! d 8 ill! I! II' 'I' Ii i Iii 'j ~. z lJ'I!1 id!iM:~l: :1: ;1 !i ::s IOl 'I!"! Iii ,!" 'I . ~ il~; Il !i 1I11I1' I 1>11, r o l.hl !!!i!!!!l Ill!. !I l! ac:: "''' <l <l .; "'.; '" ~.. '" ..J d ~ !ji I ~ hi IH ~" Ii l2 l: l!~. I, o III 'l ~Ii ?: ol! II Iii i I~, !;;! llf"!iil 3 II'" ~!"I '", ! '" l!l!!~p-,q 8 n! I! !ill IiI. ""0000000 , 'i I II, ~ ~ll m! '" ~ 8f:]l~~ "" g~"" i H~ il; ] 1;~ i ~i~ t~ ~ ---r , i I I I . JI >- ~ ll: "" o ;:= ~ <i:l is C5 "" VlNNCHI1VJ 'vIrmwn. (l" ONYIIBAO Vl\1 1~lN1J lOI5)1l1~J I I , UlllWllljlll1 Iii I '!lJ! I I I!' I I i IIi I I I I, 1111 I!I\! ,!!II!! 1I11 I >- "" o ll: . ~ ~ ;:= ~ <i:l is 2 ~i ~~ ",,- 0101 "'" II1I l!_ ;11;J .... "" o ll: , <" ~ ;:= ~ ..... <i:l is "" o "" ~i ~t ",,- ""I '" ~ ~ z u'" 0 ~ ;;:;1"", ...... i g..it I --... 1~~u:: 1 a" <1> ~<1l B3l" . "- ~. :>-' ~l ~t ....z . I eo, I :) !! I , ~Il!l!d i I I ~ jli ild I!ll.!ll on",,! > ed'I'I'llll! III 1 v G00000001 . 11___- ~ ~=~. . ili! .:l' .:~ ~ ;.:: < 'l/NI/OJ/7V) YlfDJWJl (l' ONYIIJ1AO vm l?J1N1J lOJS)fll?JJ . i , . I I ...., 9 , ;:1 I 0 ;:= 1;j ~ <!j >-- ~! "'" "" ~l ~ -.- I ___P-<JC I I .... I :) III @ lillll II Ii 0 ~ '" iii, illl iill i , I ('5 I ~ !l~~illllli " 8 ~ II I GGG0GG'i). Ie e I I '" ;:s ~ I '" '" ; I Z ;:s ! III I 0 '" ....' '" ;:s I ;:= 6 '" I $' 91 z I "-' ;::: ;:1 0 I <!j $' ;::: .... 0 I <!j ;::: $' ~ 1;j .... <!j <!j is 0 >-- '" ~~ ::, ~\ 0 II ~l '" i::::l '" ~l ~l '" ...., -.....-- 1 II Iii I II '" z Lr) ;Ibl II ~ g ~o ..0( 1< ,~ ~ .-. I ~~:<l-U $ [f' '[f "- @l' ~, (::;' ",I ~t <t' .:;::.:;g5i~~ mo-~" :>N,.~":;=~.a ~.~0 'JNI NaSS01:J '" NOSSor.; ~ ,/ v:;:l v;rr.:l=wal. SN'V'1 a1o:;liN 1 ~O ~O -~ . ~ i' I " '=- ,_ ="'~Ml::l =OIS~==~::l ~O _ -I . ..,.'=1.'':''''l:.e~~=-.:.~''':.:'_____..:.r.....r.J:'':'~':.:' _~.::"'_-_... .._..._~.,., ~.~.:l::":.~~ __...::.__..._~ -;==-=,f'~.=~'I." ! ' . . , ~ .. ;;--. to j ~! ~ , , i i :i x x. . ~ ! 1 , !p, ! ! ! hlhl Q Ii z d f Ii i I i ill " ill -' " i I Pdl. z .~!ki i i= z <{ -' ~ IL ~ ~ ~ . x.. , i;i . , l! ! W ~! ! m ! 1!! II ! ~1 i i ! I i , I dilll ! !ill! II I ,1 . ,- ! ! i1. I. ~ I ffid!!IP ~ I @lliMld @ ;1 nng ! Hi 111,I.LII I 1;11 Ii ! !Ii lll!l illlihhlll!i!! I 'i I I I' i 1 " .' I' iiI.! . I III ! il !-liil!! j- iillllh 11 III Ii II lili!ll ill ..' '" .. flI ..e.... e. ee . eo . . I ~ ~ 1 IIli'I l!!l j; II ~ I 'Ii! I ~ ~n: j. . ! :1 ~!! I~,.I 5 .~5 i I lV. ~!i!l !Ii! ~~~~S ~ ,,*-l!: 5: ~mi:'nl~ . . . (~ Z , !i ,. !l 'j'lll.. ", ! I ~ f! ~-~ ... h !Il !l;' ., 'ii d i! 'I ""m" Il,'l n l! - I!' . I' ., llll!l! lij~ !!I'I~'I' !!!!~ ;~~ f! d~ "'11 Ill!!! iji;iIIG~ l,,,!:!lil'l'~ "..ll2i.,Ili! .... ...... . . !. ., I ~ I~u~ ! ~ liUi!m '. l~!,!i5'! fi! '!IIiUU 111 I !lhh,. !iil Il!!!!!ll !l:! ;1,0,.11 ~! NI!i!:1 1lI! ,',,,,.! i '!'II'i" oj <J) !1!~~;~ Ii I 5!11"hi!!;'<1 ZI"li!!!'II' ~ !,I~l!m bl! )[ ah!9\1..... Ij;m~ . . < . 101 .---=- ~II~[TI ---"'i~=='~ (]a '\ ::;lNI 'J.I'Gl.ldO"13^aO NO:<^'VCl I ! .--.~~.~~"'_, . _.........rr.o ... , -IN]'NOSS(J7:J'::',,OSSOT.> ~:,_:.~., 'V::;l'V1roaloaJ.'aNV"'lli10:)IN1 l:iQaNV'"1::aAO ~ooar-no~'~ ,I . ~ _- , =~~Ml:) =QIS,*==~:) --:,-::="';:"U~~'r,;"',::,~~"...--...-,::,'~-~::.,:,,;:;-;::'~~'';-,.::',;:'''_-~~~-';::~':.:.:.l''~~~=-::--=-'':''''~-:'==:,==~w.:'..;;:::=:.=~"t.." . . ,1 " , :; ; ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ dH . <- dll JI !lid i! j j ;t;t.. .. ! !l ! bin! ! II Ii> I! 11'''1 ocli!!n II ! Ii I i @'ililll !! I !!dl hn~~D ~~"X1!Ii., ' ~ !llIIHJBJ .\) W" ~. M '", . ' 1t"" ,.- I 1 ! I ! I I-::: C, ~, t::... . qli . \.., t' . \J_l ~~- I I 'I \ I]' i , " I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I , '-'. '''', '", '. "0' '" "0 '. ))'" "';, , '" "'+ :, ~.'''';-''''+''' ". / " )0- / ' "'. 01' ' , '.,>, ~ '''''' 1'0" ..... "0 ~ ......<0 ~ "", ~. ""'. ~... . '-.... I ....... c. ....... . ~ :- s ,....~ ...... Zl w ~ . u ~ .1 ! ~l !i !'~ !! ~I ~a ..~ , .!! i; ~ ! ~~ ' . " ~ I tJ lli'l~l ;\il!~l ~eU~1 . . , il l'idl. ~ I illl i i.q~l ! !ii!f;! i' " 'I"'" I II ~,~ I "l~ll,!' II! I ~lltl!l I l!i - l! dillll!!! Ii 'j i'I'I k I'ill Ii! il!I!!!! !I' :l!'II. I." I',ll:~ IP' . ll";!l ~,~.',..!!l!!i ..~==",----~._- ~ .--:.=- [;J1I~l;j __.........._...,,_ 'liI\t\ ':;lNI'~~",a ,- - .... -""""'"-'......... . ......~._.PJDI....._J . , , _~ .. . I ";;IN] "1I0SS(YJ:l Jf' NaSSrrD ~:J ';I":;) V""1f'l::;=n..sJ. !/N'II" =riO?lN r ~ ~O er2:!t'+; ': i I .. ~ =<:l~N=::l =OI'O::>l==<:l::l .-1 .....~.-.=-"-l:::-'-~..:.~-~~.::::.:.:;:.:;~':'~~-:'...::r.o:'"_-~~:--==-~--:.:.."\l"Z~='='.::;."J::'~"':'.~::'=;::<;::...~~=~0;,... W H 1 ~H lll! !! 111 j i "I I !' I I' I II! !i i l "II"! ill 1 ! ! !Ii i! ! Ill!! Mil II!! II ! Illl 1.1 1.1 II 1 I II !" Ell Ii !.' 'Ill!l Ij . :lIP Ii! iil'iI lit 11l1!!l II I II l;". I" " _ , W II' ! ..' . . It .... '" . ... .... . o. II ~~/'II - ,II- - ; I' I 5~'1i11 'ffjl UIII - ~,I I, , J , I I, , l.- e-, C. I.- t::' I.- ~ , ill! . \.1 \J . ~--=-- \\\ \)\\ " "-. ',,- " <1", "- "'0> " >p. "- .9-} ", ?,,( "- ~p. ..... >0' "-, o~ '''-, .'.;~o<, "'-,~000 "-, ',,- c "-, '''-, "-. . ~ (~ ~ Z ~ I ~ J 3 m ~ ~ i ~ l'~ ~ ~ Ii] ~ j ~ JI ill L ~ '" I I~ ~! ; m ! Ii! I ~ ~~a! . . :. 'i -iW!! :,' 'Ii Ii! !Elilll "I~'ll' 111'1 i lllji ! . '1IIlI !!jr'mf'"lj! i!/I'~ 1'0' qlj .11~!llill! !Ii ;5I'~lllil ~ U' .ll!'L!l ~!,~ il!~}!h . I . 'Ill\! IMll;1 ~~ Ii!!!""! r- llli'!'l! ! '--- 'llilhl m II"!.,,,. I "l:d!l! Ii! lli~i!,ll i!i I :;il!!iij lil: lIllil'llo !1l,,! ::l!lllli!!!!I!l!ll ~ !IHII!llI~lll ~!;!luql ~ JI,U,n., ,fill II ~ .. .. . ., i Ii I i. -----~~ ., '~~ 1II:::111~lu$Tdlm6' ----~~ ' !. h l: o o~:<-~-_~ 'il/ill .1. II --------..... ~ i!ll'!!"ii!, ~iiiHHLnil:lll: ~~~illlmli 1l1111111li - It ~ ... ~ ~ ,... ... <= ... n, :i ..... .", ~ ~ ... t .." <= .", . -, .." "" -!1l_____ ~ ----------- ~ ---- -, --- ---------- . . 1 Ii ill"; 13~1 rl~i ud~ i' al;!~l ~llli! ,I 1'1"1 1;11-1; ~!iili t I! I! II ~: ~f i I'll! ~1 '11 ,.f. ffi !, -l!i .r ." 'i".-' Iii _j_ "! ,.-li~ I!.l !I:".... 1",- !~i~h Ill:! .!.dl@ ! i',' . ! I, ll' I 'II " ! I i' 'ill i; "i'l II~. I: Il ~ lil!l Ii;;;!,",'!' iii' ,.." II l;" J <il :i'~E Ii ,h. l~ . Ii ..:lEi 'V, '! i. . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET R\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc 8 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Planning Application Number: fit 04- 05::J..~ 1. General Plan Designation: CO...........,,,;!-t CO""''''''-f'Cio..' (ee) Consistent? 2. Zoning Designation: C. .",..,vn;~ t o.......e.rr,"'\ r ~0 Consistent? 3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: ~ General Plan EIR I2(l Sensitive Biological Habitat Map 1M Sensitive Archeological Area Map ~ Sensitive Paleontological Area Map ~ Fault Hazard Zone Map @ Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map ~ 100 Year Flood Map rr Future Roadway Noise Contour Map o Other (Specify) o Previous EIR/ND. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): l'l~ :a",'Tht., SlN~"fU \-;"".., f6"'- fA- t\\- OA\q \,A-~'-O S-lu+- ~A- D\-05"Il"l t o Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): o Other: 4. Environmental Determination: o Exempt o Mitigated Negative Declaration o Negative Declaration o EIR " \81. A~e"dv"'TO 'f"",,;O>l:,"t ~~~ Nc.;<'h.... ~'''('o,:no..... o 20 Day Review 0 30 Day Review ~ 10 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: Consistent Inconsistent o o o land Use Circulation Housing ~ 81 81 R:\FORMS\ST AFF REPORTS\PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercia1.dot I PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Consistent Inconsistent o o o o o o o as/Conservation Growth ManagemenUPublic Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development . ~ g] ~ fg] 181 ~ ~ 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: o Site Planninq: o A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area character? '''''' f""'~"L'\- ..i \-L eon>i..h ~ .y,,,cl.tJ to........".. ,,0<1 . '" , ""'l~ ~\"f~ ..,.ilol-.> tAl....,""- ~"':'~....... ?<Of..n-, h'M. "'~~'i'....1 \7....I"i",~ h.,..... b..,..s;~ 50 ~ ovo~ ~ "",Il,,,,'ioofo..... ~..!>I"f'" 1\.,. "''7I-_~IlI'r:6'",.l;~, e:. ",....<\-. 1\",-"1.. L........~J ....... 17<U' ",,,,"1,;~"""1 ~\cJ.. B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating nuisances and hazards? '...... ~..!,.. >i~i.. ~e.l ~ \-..00 S.iel..!>.., .s.~, tA.oI............,.... ~..""u...... T\.e. "'..,..........a..... ,.....~...,..-..leel..H......""'-N ~""""~''''''"",~","~o(\>\':'''\\o.\-fo... "'.....i'lo.""'\..~" ~ \o\a"t..ta.......J's \'" "",t\;WI'\\'fL"'...l t~ f'c.w-;YV\c.lrc.'I"'" o+'r\,.", s..tka""',\\ ~ N\ly \..~ o....c. 'iooV<:o"led. C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots . to define the street edge? ""......~ ..n~uf-~lcl.;..,'b ha.., '"~ \"C/>oW ...u-....~ -1\ lIIi<ol.. \.....'\t.~.....c:\;).j."... +-:1"'- ~\\6;"",...;\\....~'rtl;c.o\..L.."" ......~n_~ ~ _..;~,,~....;~ ~-: \._~"k ""+ r....",\oot.u.H7 t\......'Ip&.~-..~. Y'a~UL7 ~ -]rv t.uw_,,'a.t"r..~,...~ fT~,4.. ~""'.."'- \1.-fu~ ",iel... \.,,"'~..\r""f\"~"" wi" >"""...~ ~l""''''' \+...~ylc.i...., lor.w-OM t\-.~ Parkinq and Circulation: . o A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate through the Rarking lot, and exit the site easily? J. J\J i:":~~o:~":,,,"~~~~S::~,~ ~t..t'~'~~~~~~ho.ti;:,j i~ ~.y:\'%t.. f...c.\\\,",... ~_ "I"'"c.f"-M.\"'l lo\- I"'"io~'l-..,\",,~ 01)\"....<1:) e"'~. ..",) "",,\-'I-o\<. '>\l-e.o:o.s,\"1- B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to pedestrians and bicyclists?1\- dc.;;"...nJ. ~~""" <:00"".;.\0.......;\\ \lrc..C)t..Ii9\.cJ ~,,~ ~:.'l~~~t.. ~f;~:ti~~:~~t~~~~ ~~7.~~~~~~~?~ +0 ..........."""'~ .......>''''? ..~-.>, C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered from publi.c view? S"",^l.C.~~ill\-\~<;,u.n \o<.o..~...'r 'I:'ne'>O\lH-~*c-.~"'of-G~\\J{~'W'. '-C ~...c;.,\;\-1.~~ "''''-V\o'l- ",c;,\Io'c..m",..nj f"'11\il '" ~~cf-~'1' ')ho,,\,} ~II)",).\'" s~ ~ L6,Y\~x-,q\"r""'\ Sc.w<!. n Sc.Y...~ ~~,\\M'+:...ol'""l\4,eo.O..l-..te"'t- ;~i+:: Buildinq Architecture: A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass? \-u.<'lc. h\..",\' a~1,.- .."..,\ ""il\..~"e.~>" c.<>.,).,," <-'V""'~ "1,0,", \\\tl.c." "'i'~UL"''''V\l-''- . h:....~ b<-<=:" ~"Q{.:I~cI.j-I..,^,~'.h ~I>L"..... .f--"I'~;hC.W"\'l-j'Q?-.")-) ...",,} ~eY'd,* ""'j->- \::1",IJ,''''')5-' l." ....l.)"h."", "lN1IJ-,,,, o'if>e.\-:. ..",J. ..c."~,,,-rc...d...w..\1 ho.v.... \1"~,,, ,. "c..v-fb.r_~ ..."."'5 \4-.... ~.~-\" ~\ev...'ri.,,^ of-"-v.c.\.. ?v(\'^,....., w\",c.\... """v(<l~ ~cl..i...\<>.,..~' ..yo \-\c....o'","", ,... "'....,), ,'Y\.\-eo J \ , . I 1 '.- R:\FORMS\STAFFREPORTS\PROJECTREVIEWWORKSHEET.commercla1.dot V"t~r. A ecoy-tI'oT""~ (.o..s~"1t:Jo,Y"cf\ Wi \'\ l:?e.. 2 es....I.I;)l..~ \?~ev..~-hI.Wlo\r"j~ ....hi...). ~..YV") ru b.....J.c.4.tp H.... \"\'nev,.Y""'<>S.5 6+ +l... <:..- ,....... 0 b v(lt.!.i "'5 ~ . . . o PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity wittlin itself?Tl->c. "'J\...~ I(u...."'of ~ \--w.....u-~;\'o~il<X;"~s..i,, ~hli.ti~\\'t L.."5;S~+- . IoN! +-....... ~c.. b\-\.Aev. s,-"..... Y1)tl;~ ~~..........,...". g,,'l""",-y-\-iu.:..J.. 0.\110.....' w\-\-h""'.....h..\...\ "", bV\\c1.h..., ~G..\c;. Go\'I""V). ~\".,....s.1\....r '7o.........f' ~Ic- ""--~ }.,..e.~'I"\.1.I \-\\;1'A!...J. nl"\. t...o.r\..... ;'V\d~"~J..Jo,..\ h tJ;\J"''1''''t.\{N-i~~ c.V"""~~....,J.C?i.'_MfV'f"/lO"""'f ,,"l'o.c).. Ctl.""'-\-\....\J\'rf +\"''n",h~,,\- \-\.-.'C..-~.'T-o...;\Ce_\-'~.:Y"'... C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful open space between the buildings and/or the street? ~ht; 1'\<0(<."",""," <>~ +h:, *-\-~;l ~\\~in... Alonqtnelo~"'~ :ror,~..rt lit\C,......'\."'..~~~;"'..-\"'Si..,,;\'I-:t~.......~e'7~.~.....r , . """ \W<<~T>'" $'"'........ s~ ,~~\1 ~.....e""" "" 'r"-_\"'......,.,~. /l. h...,tc.l .._""" or.r..~n; D. Ho~"aOta'~ho~th~c~rrec'fu'Faf6l1;'ments (building base, windows, doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials meet t.he intent of the design guidelines? Oeto.....\-i".... ''''''''<:' wi \I b..."'yr!,....d to u.~ buna)'f'\C) b6.~e, o.:r(..o.~~ <l't'\.d. hwc.~ fur'" -to'l"'",""",o.J'"\-j. W'II'\~o...J ,h.~~ o.~ 5rLc.."7 h:-,-1t. b-e.c:..V'\ . . . '. . ..". n"l""",,k. \ <.0("<..",.. \\--.,,- :""f h,....., "'''0 .....~...;..h V~W .,,+,,"- ",,,,\J,;~~~ .~51y 11:;'1-1 "..,,'{ ,"",,"'tt......>,-. Landscapinq: ""'l'\l",~...",,-..~"i''';h~ H,..<l.... r....~. A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? aVes 0 No, why? Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Vear Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conforrn with the design guidelines? ~Ves 0 No f>l) 01V\d(-\-\O~ ' C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and .separate them from the surrounding pavements? l.o.~~ ",I.."w> h.._ ~_ f,YIlvic:l:J -c..,.""<-""" ;;.........''"' "'~.> ,,^d f'kc... \:N\\di""p .1'0<.4\'1"\0."'\-\"')> "'.."'~ko-y....vAA.:.d G'o'r 'r\.,~ >h<>'f'I'\Y'I'j <;;c..~ ~(,c.. :sr.ck. 'W'=:. ~vc. ll~-ft"ovlc:l.w~.pc.;le,.h-l"""'6'}'''''c;J. D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate w[th of the architecture and landscaping? Pl.."l.~ fv~"av,.... ",,,,J fi~I--X~... ....-r.. c"".."..'r;l:>\o:,. w,~ \-\...e.. bu,\d.\"", CIo......o,....\\-e.l,..\v~Q.\"\O" \",.,..o.c;~,n5' M.bf't.O...,L.....1 J.ec.u"""-~ve p",,~, w~....... .c.~o-\-v~'7 ~d- n\,....\.--e...... r'\...u.._~~v,-<\..r,..J1"\.....v..s- ~p""'" -h.. w.......\-hf>,.".. C.~""""f\~""".""7 .....M v""f-t \-h~ ~\o,.O\""""'-5 c.e.-.\1o,-. $~ t-r_..."...l:x.tA\ froviclccl o.'!-l'cJt.>HlM f'j.,~s. 7. Development Code Consistency: A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? R\FORMS\STAFF REPORTS\PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercial.dot 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Circulation: . Architectural Desiqn: t.jc.":>7i"c- .......>~ ..,,~ \:N\lc. o<;-~ \;7uilJ,,,,'Y 1.,,,> p.c.n "".0.~J wi~ H,.. u.sc.O+-.. (.u".~")...vJ. h "7~~r-'"'~ ""\....-.),...:\...~~ 1:...... Q-AI'\'~'r..,^ do. ....1~{^r....~.....v~ ^"fT'.....rl.~ I~~...'\\ .,^",,,,,,;,P o..",d::h'04 (o\;~~;\-i~:\'::~~Y,).,,~)-i\)'"t.~ o\C)~ ~\\\....~\cl.;'^, ~i:f-o~>o..~ o~~T> r\) e",,~~ ~ Site Planninq and Desiqn: .."'<~ ",y<- h.~ <-",,-,,+...1. Compatibility: \h'Ly"'j<.4- 'i~ i" "'.\- ,.""~<A<\i..<..,,,...+t. ..-{,,,\-i"'') 0'-1"1..",,,,<..\ ,r~,;J..",lh", \ vIe..... """" tl...'"~~".._,J".....\ 50"':1\~ c.a...,.,d. r).e",),^ 1')+ ~@ (:~'""_~, r.......\........ ,,'~ r...~~ y-~\-{\..\~ u.u'~ l~".v'" <>,; "'l .......;, )-\~~ c..,..........Y"t\..\ ",..... ...".1 ...!l1 \x.p. <.o""~i.......... \-"""1 o.dJ.il-io" \" rh<:<VtP.- B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? W D Yes, with conditions -- No Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: loll,., (PC{ I 't;{\ (0.;17 Ac.v-e~ .:1(, +1o'rs. I 17"/0 F..." ".~.... """i' "\\b,,"-,e.rl . ;E8Vironmenta:l1;lss@slJf~if(;l1riaIIW'iatWf~-I" Hillside/Slope Arch.lPaleo Fault Zone Flood Noise ':!:: ~SetoaCK'sr ~~r ~:~.~ ' Front Side Side Rear Parkin '~I'.! Traffic Habitat Subs.lLiqfctn Stream/Creek Air Quality / North East West South c (',v . e > . R:\FORMS\ST AFF REPORTS\PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.commercial.dot 4 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_ R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\STAFFREPORT.doc 9 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0525 A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO SINGLE-STORY RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 26,470 SQUARE-FEET WITHIN THE CREEKSIDE CENTRE SHOPPING PLAZA ON 6.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND NICOLE LANE ALSO KNOWN AS APN 921-810- 025. WHEREAS, McArdle Associates Architects filed Planning Application No. PA04-0525 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at regular meetings, considered the Application on March 30, 2005 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby . incorporated by reference. Section 2. Development Plan Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The plan to develop the retail center and two retail buildings totaling 26,470 square feet is consistent with the Community Commercial land use designation contained in the General Plan. Moreover, the project conforms with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. The retail center is properly planned, designed and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes. R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft PC Reso.doc B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public . health, safety and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to occupancy City staff will inspect all construction. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA04-0525) a Development Plan for a retail center consisting of two-retail building totaling 26,470 square-feet for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of March 2005. David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary . [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of March 2005, by the following vote: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: . AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft PC Reso.doc 2 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft PC Reso.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0525 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct two-single story retail building totaling 26,470 square feet within the Creekside Centre shopping Plaza located at the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane Assessor's Parcel No. 921-81 0-025 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Commercial Retail Commercial Retail Approval Date: March 30, 2005 Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty- eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to Indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:\D P\2004\04~0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 1 3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. . 4. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 5. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 6. The approved landscape construction drawings for Creekside Centre shall be revised to include enhanced landscaping, decorative features and monumentation improvements at the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane. The revisions shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of building permits for the restaurant(s) located at the northeast corner of the site and shall be fully installed prior to issuance of restaurant(s) final occupancy. 7. Site amenities to include tables and chairs shall be provided within the "Retail Plaza" area prior to occupancy of abutting tenant spaces. . The type and design of the furniture shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 8. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 9. All downspouts shall be internalized. . 10. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 11. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco: ICI "Manilla Tan" #551 Stucco: ICI "Taupewood" #372 Stucco: ICI "Onionskin Tan" #421 Roofing: AEP-Span Metal Standing Seam "Agean Copper" Metal Canopies: Same as Roofing Stone Base: Ledgestone Aluminum Storefront: Timely White #CC301 Glass: Clear . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 2 . . . 12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 14. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staft, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 15. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 16. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 17. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the aftected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 18. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 19. A comprehensive shopping center sign program shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. 20. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 3 21. genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be . consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. In addition, the plans shall show the following a. Street landscaping is existing and shall remain on Overland Drive and Nicole Lane. New plantings on the project shall coordinate and be compatible with these existing plantings. The existing landscape shall be refurbished as necessary. b. If the access altemative is developed at the at the southeast comer of Building B, plantings shall be revised as approved by the Planning Director to insure an effective screen is provided to screen the rear of the building from Nicole Lane. c. Slope banks 5' or greater in vertical height with slopes greater than or equal to 3:1 shall be landscaped at a minimum with an appropriate ground cover, one 15 gallon or larger size tree per 600 square feet of slope area, and one 1 gallon or larger shrub for each 100 square feet of slope area. Slope banks in excess of 10' in vertical height with slopes greater than or equal to 2:1 shall also be provided with one 5 gallon or larger tree per 1,000 square feet of slope area in addition to the above requirements. d. One landscape planter shall be provided per 10 parking spaces. The finger planting width shall be a minimum of 5' wide with the length equal to the adjoining parking space. The planter shall contain a minimum one tree with surrounding groundcover, shrubs or both. e. Areas proposed for future development at the north end of the project site shall be temporarily tufted, seeded and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control as approved by the Director of Planning. The landscape construction plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans. d. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). g. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long.term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 22. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after. thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 23. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "Intemational Orange". R:\D P\2004\04.0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 4 . . . 24. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Prior to Building Occupancy 25. Prior to the release of occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent public right-of-ways. 11 upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 26. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 27. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the pJantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. . 28. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 951 696-3000." 29. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3 square feet in size. 30. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. . 31. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland 11\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 5 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . 32. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 33. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 34. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 35. If Nicole Lane remains a private street, the southerly driveway will be approved as shown on the approved site plan. 36. If Nicole Lane is to be dedicated as a public street, the southerly driveway shall be eliminated as shown on the approved site plan as the "Alternative Driveway" detail. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 37. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 38. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. . 39. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 40. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 41. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 6 . . . stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 42. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Planning Department b. Department of Public Works 43. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 44. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 45. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 46. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 47. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveway(s) shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400. d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. 48. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive approaches, and street lights. b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland ll\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 7 49. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. . 50. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 51. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniforrn Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 52. As deemed necessary by the Departrnent of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 53. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 54. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. . FIRE DEPARTMENT 55. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 56. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 57. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) . R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 8 . . . 58. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet frorn a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 59. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 60. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 61. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 62. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 63. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 64. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 65. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 66. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters andlor numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 67. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. R:ID P\2004104-0525 Overland IIIDraft Conditions of Approval.doc 9 Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to . installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 68. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 69. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 70. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 71. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 72. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions . 73. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 74. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 75. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the City; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 76. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 77. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on . R:\D P\2004\04~0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 10 . 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. . 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. 91. 92. . March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the Califomia Building Code Appendix 29. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 93. Show all building setbacks. R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 11 94. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions 95. The trash enclosures shall be larger to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 96. Any damage done to the existing Class II bike lanes on Overland will be repaired to the satisfaction of Public Works. 97. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 98. All parkways, interior landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 99. Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. . Prior to Issuance of the First Building Permit 100. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 101. The developer shall comply with the attached correspondence from Rancho California Water District dated October 12, 2004. 102. The developer shall comply with the attached correspondence from Riverside County Flood Control District dated November 1 , 2004. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date . Applicant's Printed Name R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc 12 @ 11_ later Board{)fnirector~ Juhn E. Hoag-Jand Presidenl Csaba F. Ko Sf. VieePI-esidcnt Stephen J. Corona Ralph If. Daily Ben R. D.'akc Lisa D. Herman Michael R. MeMiIlan Officers: Brian J. Brady Gcneralj\hn:lgcr Phillip L. Forbes Director of FimU1cc-TrNl~llrcr E.P. "Bob" Lemons DirectorofEngine~J'ine; Perry R. Louck CnntrolJcr Linda M. Fregoso Di~trid Secretary/Administrative Service~Man<lgcJ: C. Micll3el Cowctt Best Best & Krieger LLP Gener<<.lCounsel October 12, 2004 W f~~ ~ ;1 ;;D;'wl By Matthew Harris, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ...........,'-=--- SUBJECT: WATER A V AILABILITY, OVERLAND II COMMERCIAL PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 30107, APN 921.810-025 PA04-0525 [DA VCONJ Dear Mr. Harris: P~case be advised tl~at the J.bc\'e refe::.-~nced pr~perty 1'3 10c~ted \vithi!! tnf': boundaries of Rancho Califomia Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon constmction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium development, with individual building owners and an owners' association maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection, and landscape irrigation facilities. RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities as a condition of approval for the project. In addition to this agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each condominium unit. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 7J1~2?l;pf- Development Engineering Manager 04\MM:mc037\FCF c: Laurie \Villiams, Engineering Services Supervisor Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road. Post Offi~e B"x 9017 . TemecuJa, California 92589-9017 . (951) 296.6900 . FAX (951) 296.6860 WARREN D. W]LLlAMS :Jencral Manager-Chief Engineer ]995 MARKET STREET RlVERSIDE, CA 9250] 951.955.]200 951.788.9965 FAX 51180.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CityofTemecula ANDWATERCONSERVATIONDlST I,~!!~.n\.' r~. [] m ~1ni~1 Planning Department ' II1I Post Office Box 9033 ! n: ~,OV (; d 2004 i U' I Temecula, California 92589-9033 lJ U ' Ll1) Attention: M,o.-T\i>,.J ~S ladies and Gentlemen: 'PA.oLJ p ., Re: The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be consicfered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project With respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such Issue: No comment. -L This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional Interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such faCilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection Will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. This project is located within the limits of the District's \o.\.",l"?\~ qt.F~- "Il'Ml"Gitl../>. J",uz;.y Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopteO;aj5plicable fees should be paid by cashiers check or money order only to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of building or grading permits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate In effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION ~ This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other information reCjuired to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional letter of Map Revision (ClOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this prot'ect, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Departmen of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, ~~ ARTURO DIAZ Senior Civil Engineer Date /1/{lf! ~ cPt:7t!?-/ c: Transportation and land Management Agency Attn: Greg Neal AN . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.4 PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION R\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\STAFFREPORT.doc 10 - . City of Temecula Planning DI~partment . Notice of Proposed Negative Declaration PROJECT: Planning Application No. 01-0418 (General Plan Amendment) Planning Application No. 01-0509 (Specific Plan Amendment) Planning Application No. 01-0510 (Zone Change) APPLICANT: Eli Lilly & Company LOCATION: South side of Overland Drive between Margarita and Ynez Roads DESCRIPTION: A proposal to change the General Plan land use designations from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial (CC); to amend the Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) by removing Planning Area No.3 from SP-7; and change the Zoning designations from SP-7 on one parcel and from BP to CC on two parcels. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission will recommend that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration lor this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Negative Declaration is October 31,2002 to November 19,2002. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033. City Hall is located at 43200 Business Park Drive. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Negative Declaration is provided through: X The Local Newspaper. X Posting the Site. X Notice to Adjacent Property Owners. If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Emery J. Papp, Associate Planner at (909) 694-6400. Prepared by: ~9J' 1- f..,if Emery J. Papp, Associate Planner . (Signature) (Name and Title) R:\G P AIPAOI.0418 Eli UllylNOTICE OF PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION.doc I City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Planning Application No. PA01-0418, General Plan Amendment Planning Application No. PA01-0510, Specific Plan Amendment Plannin A lication No. PA01-0509, Zone Chan e Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Emery J. Papp, Associate Planner 909 694-6400 Project Location West side of Margarita Road, south side of Overland Drive and north of Solana Way (Lot Nos. 1,2, and 3 of TPM 30107 see attached ma Project Sponsor's Name and Address Excel Engineering 440 State Place Escondido, CA. 92029 General Plan Designation Business Park (BP) Zoning BP and SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center, SP-7) Description of Project PA01-0418 is a request to change the General Plan Land Use designations from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial (CC). PA01-0510 is a request to change the Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) by removing Planning Area No.3 from SP-7. PA01-0509 is a request to change Zoning from SP-7 to CC on one arcel, from BP to CC on two arcels. Surrounding Land Uses and SE,tting North: SP-7; Costco retail store and vacant land East: High Density Residential (H); Solana Ridge Apartments South: H and Service Commercial (SC); Acacia Park Resort Apartments and Paradise Chevrolet West: LI and SC; Guidant Corporation building and parking lot, and Norm Reeves overflow parking lot and vehicle repair buildin Other public agencies whose approval is re uired Approach to Analysis . R:\G P AIPA01.0418 Eli UlIy\Eli Ully Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc . Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use Plannina Hazards Population and Housina Noise Geoloaic Problems Public Services Water Utilities and Service Systems Air QualltV Aesthetics TransDortation/Circulation Cultural Resources Sioloaical Resources Recreation Enerav and Mineral Rescurces Mandatory Findinas of SlCnificance ~ None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ~ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be oreoared I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environmimt, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the oroiect proponen!. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a 'potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is reouired, but it must analvze onlv the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuantto that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imoosed uoon the prooosed oroiect, nothino further is reauired. ~ 4.fh~ Signature I .~ 10 Iz~ /O~ Date I . For R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli LillylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 2 1. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Suooortina Information Sources Incorporated a. Physically divide an established community? ..J b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agem:y with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific ..J plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ..J natural communitv conservation clan? . Comments: The project site is vacant and is surrounded by SP-7 (Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan) zoned properties to the north that include a Costco retail store and vacant land, High Density Residential (H) zoned property to the east that includes the Solana Ridge Apartments, H and Service Commercial (SC) zoned properties to the south that contain the Acacia Park Resort Apartments and Paradise Chevrolet, and LI and SC zoned properties to the west that include the Guidant Corporation building and parking lot, and a Norm Reeve:; overflow parking lot and vehicle repair building. The development of this site. will be consistent with the commercial land use patterns found in the surrounding properties. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. The project will not conflict with applicable General Plan designations, environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. Impacts from all General Plan land use designations were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency. Mitigation measures approved with the EIR will be applied to this project where necessary. Further, all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are also being given the opportunity to comment on the project, and it is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific environmental plans or policies. The project site has been previously graded and services are available into the area. There will be no impacts on adopted environmental plans or policies. The proposed project will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The site has been graded and continuously grubbed for weed abatement and fire protection. This site is not within any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli UllylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 3 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated less Than SignifICant No Impact Impact b. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? " a. " c. " Comments: The project is consistent with the City's General Plan Community Commercial land use designation, and the proposed zoning designations. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing as the site is vacant and has non-residential General Plan Land Use designations. The site is zoned for industrial and commercial development. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:\G P AIPA01-Q418 Eli UllylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 4 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? I Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and SUDDortina Information Sources Incorporated a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death -J involvina: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based ..J on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and GeoloDv Soecial Publication 42. Ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? . -J iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? ..J iv) Landslides? -J b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? -J c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, -J and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral sDreadinQ, subsidence, liouefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial -J risks to life or DroDertv? e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems ..J where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? . . Comments: 3.a.i. _ a.iv. The most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area shows that there are no faults through this property; therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 3. b,c,d,e. The approval of the GPA, the SPA and the ZC are actions that will not directly lead to development. Consequently, there will be no impacts to geology and soils. . R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli LillylEli Ully Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC)_doc . 5 4. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Supportina Information Sources Incorporated a. Violate any water qw:dity standards or waste discharge ..J reauirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater lable level (e.g., the production rate ..J of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have be,en aranted\? c. Substantially alter the ,~xisting drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a ..J stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on. or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a ..J stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodina on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage ..J systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantial~( degrade water quality? ..J g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood -.J Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area structures ..J which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or stru(:tures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a -.J result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ..J Comments: These actions will not cleate a need for additional water supplies, nor will they impact issues of quality, drainage, or flood zones. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:\G P AIPAQ1-Q41S Eli LillylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 6 5. AIR QUALITY. Where ~Ivailable, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and SupportinQ Information Sources Incorporated a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ..J air Quality plan? b. Violate any air quality ~ltandard or contribute substantially ..J to an existinq or proiected air oualitv violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient ..J air quality standard (induding releasing emissions which exceed Quantitative thresholds for ozone orecursors? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ..J concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ..J of people? . Comments: Approval of these actions will not conflict with applicable air quality plans nor violate air quality or pollution . standards. No new impacts am anticipated as a result of this project. . R:\G P AIPA01.0418 Eli LillylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 7 6. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially SignifICant Unle"" Mitigation Incorporated less Than Significant No Impact Impact Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or con estion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion mana ement a enc for desi nated roads or hi hwa s? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safet risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incorn atible uses e. ., farm e ui ment? Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted ~.olicies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bic cle racks? " " " " " " " Comments: . Approval of these actions will not conflict with applicable transportation or circulation plans or standards. A traffic study was prepared for this project in January 2001 that discusses trip generation equivalency at the General Plan level. The traffic study indicates that average daily trip generation will be within Level of Service "D" during peak periods, and Level of Service "C" or better during non-peak periods as required by the City's General Plan and Growth Management Action Plan. The average daily trip counts for the intersections affected by this project at the time the traffic study was prepared, are as follows: INTERSECTION AVERAGE DAILY TRIP COUNTS - EXISTING PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS - NORTH BOUND SOUTH BOUND EAST BOUND WEST BOUND INTERSECTION Peak L T R L T R L T R L T R LEVEL OF Hour SERVICE Margarita Rd. at AM 386 587 0 0 754 192 80 0 78 0 0 0 C Overland Dr. PM 288 855 0 0 926 131 310 o. 621 0 0 0 B Ynez Rd. at Overland AM 164 478 45 50 476 29 38 161 85 46 377 109 C Dr. PM 189 954 242 221 897 108 239 .570 289 138 250 157 C R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli UllylEii Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA. ZC).doc 8 The traffic study also identifies the impacts to the affected intersections at project buildout. The traffic counts shown in the Table below incorporate trip counts from two additional parcels related to the future development. of the site but are not includecl as part of the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, or Zone Change. The average daily trip count takes into consideration the proposed land use changes for the parcels on the south side of Overland Drive between Margarita and Ynez Roads. and the parcels north of Solana Way and west of Margarita Road. Because the traffic study takes a larger project area into consideration, it is important to note that the traffic impacts created by the proposed land use and zone change will be less than the cumulative impacts identified for the future development of this site. The peak hour traffic analysis for the intersections affected by the project at the time the traffic study was prepared are summarized as follows: INTERSECTION AVERAGE DAILY TRIP COUNTS - PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS WITH PROJECT - NOETH BOUND SOUTH BOUND EAST BOUND WEST BOUND LEVEL INTERSECTION Peak L T R L T R L T R L T R OF Hour SERVICE Margarita Rd. AM 411 598 0 0 924 221 156 0 101 0 0 0 C at Overland Dr. PM 541 928 o. 0 .1062 .::180. 502 .. : 635 .0 . . 0 0 0 o. Ynez Rd. at .AM 1.193 509 77 188 529 29 38 228 108 46 406 174 C Overland Dr. PM 238 1014 307 . 391 925 108 239 655 293 138 335 352 C The results of the study indicate that impacts to circulation are within the goals established by the City's General Plan, and conform to policies contained in the City's Growth Management Action Plan. The study has. been reviewed and accepted by the Public Works Department. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:IG P AIPA01-Q418 Ell UllylEli Lilly Inilial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 9 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. f. . Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mmgation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish an,j Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? " " " Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, slJch as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? " " " Comments: The area is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. However, habitat Conservation fees will not be required to mitigat'~ the effect of cumulative impacts to the species from urbanization occurring throughout western Riverside County because this project is an administrative approval only. Future development of the site will require these fees to be paid. The applicant has already miti9ated potential impacts to burrowing owls by relocating their dens. A report filed by the project biologist indicates that there are no immitigable impacts to burrowing owls as a result of the relocation. Mass grading ha'l already occurred on the site per approval of Tentative Map 30107. Per Condition of Approval No. 14 for TPM 30107, the applicant will obtain clearance from the Department of Fish and Game concerning the presence of Riverside Fairy Shrimp in the drainage channel that runs through the westerly portion of the site, prier to obtaining precise grading permits. It should be noted that the site has already been disturbed and that approval of the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Zone Change will not directly lead to development of the site. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\G P AIPAOH'418 Eli UllylEli Lilly Inl~al Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 10 8. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Supportina Information Sources Incorporated a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would bE' of value to the region and the ..J residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally.important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local ..J oeneral plan, specific [llan or other land use olan? . Comments: The project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources or in the loss of an available, locally important mineral reSource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified the City of Temecula a classification of MRZ.3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits, which have the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are determined as not containing deposits of significant economic value based upon available data in reports prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . . R:\G P AIPA01.0418 Ell LillylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 11 . 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Potentially Potantlally Significant less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or ..J disposal of hazardous materials? b. Crate a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and ..J accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ..J d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials siles compiled pursuant to Government Code Sec:tion 65962.5 and, as a result, " would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the ..J project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workina in the proiect area? f. For a project within the. vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or ..J workina in the proiect area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency ..J , evacuation olan? h. Expose people or stru(:tures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involvin'~ wildland fires, including where ..J wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermi;(ed with wildlands? Comments: These actions are for the future development of commercial and office buildings. No hazardous materials or other risks to health will occur as a result of this project. When an application is made for future development proposals, a Statement of OpElration and a Business Plan will be required that will be reviewed by the City's Fire Department. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . , R:IG P AIPA01-o41a ElllillylEIi Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 12 10. NOISE. Would the proje(:t result in: Potentially Potentially SignifICant less Than Significant Unless Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Mitigalion impact Impact Incorporated a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess 01 standards established in the local general plan or noise " ordinance, or aoolicable standards of other aaencies? b. Exposure 01 persons to or generation 01 excessive " aroundborne vibration or aroundborne noise levels? c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the " oroiect? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the proi.,ct vicinity above levels existing " without the oroiect? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles 01 a public airport or public use airport, would the " project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive nois" levels? l. For a project within the vicinity 01 a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the " orolect area to excessive noise levels? . . Comments: This project site is currently designated for the development 01 industrial or business park buildings. The site is vacant and development of the land logically will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long run. However, the proposal to change the General Plan Land Uses and Zoning will not create noise. Therefore, no impacts will result from this project. . R:\G P AIPA01-Q418 Ell LillylEli Ully Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 13 11. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the following areas: Potentially Potentially Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Supportinq Information Sources Incorporated a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction " of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? b. Fire protection? " c. Police protection? " d. Schools? " e. Parks? " f. Other public facilities? " Comments: . The project will have no impact on, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The liJlure development of this site will incrementally increase the need for these services. However, no impacts will result from this project. . R:\G P AIPA01.o418 Eli UllylEli Ully Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 14 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Potootially Potentially Significant less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Millgation Impact Impact Issues and Supportina Information Sources Incorporated a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the -J applicable Reaional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the. construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing -J facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the -J construction of which c:ould cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are -J new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected -J demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to -J accommodate the proiect's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and -J reQulations related to solid waste? . . Comments: The project will have ne, impact on, or result in a need for new water, wastewater, storm drains or other public infrastructure. Tile future development of this site will incrementally increase the need for these services. However, no impacts will result from this project. . R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli LillylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 15 13. AESTHETICS. Would the> project: Potentially Significant Impect Potentially Significant Unless Mitlgation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact d. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage l;cenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic hi hwa ? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ualit of the site and its surround in s? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ..J ..J a. b. c. ..J ..J Comments: The project will not affeGt a scenic vista or scenic highway. The project is not located in an area where there is a scenic vista. The City does not have any designated scenic highways. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . . R:\G P AIPA01-0418 Eli LillylElI Ully Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 16 'r-' I i 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: potentially Potentiany Significant Less Than Significant Unless Significant No Impact Mitigation Impact Impact Issues and Supportina Information Sources Incorporated a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of " a historical resource aB defined in Section 1506.5? b. Cause a substantial ac:verse change in the significance of " an archaeolonical resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological " resource or site or unique aeoloaic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred " outside of formal cemeteries? . Comments: The southeast portion of the project site is located in an area of sensitivity for archaeological resources pursuant 10 1he General Plan (Figure, 5-6). The Eas1ern Information Center of the University of California at Riverside (UCR) states in its response dated April 9, 2001 that a previous Phase I cultural resources study (MF#4~124) identified no cultural resources. However, there will be no grading resulting from this action, therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . . R:\G P A\PA01.0418 Eli LillylEIi Lilly Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 17 15. RECREATION. Would thl~ project: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated less Than Significant No Impact Impact b. Issues and Su ortin Information Sources Would the project incmase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that sub:;tantial physical deterioration of the facili would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? ~ a. ~ Comments: The project will have no impact on the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities, or affect existing recreational opportunities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . - R:IG P AIPA01.0418 Eli LillylElI Ully Initial Study (GPA. SPA, ZC).doc 18 16. Agricultural Resources. Would the project: Poter'ltially Potell1ially Significant Unless Less Than Issues and $unnnJ1inn Information Sources Significant Mitigation SigniflCa1lt No Imoad IncorOOraled lmoaCl lmnact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and ..j Monitoring Program 01 the California Resources Agency, to non-aqricultural use? b. Conflict with the existil1g zoning for agricultural use, or a ..j Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion ..j of farmland, to non-aaricultural use? . The project site is not currently in agricultural production, does not have an agricultural zoning designation, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract. In addition, this property is not considered prime or unique Farmland of statewide importance pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency or the City of Temecula's General Plan. Therefore, there are no impacts related to this issue. . . R:\G P AIPAOHJ41B Eli 1I11ylEli Lilly Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 19 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation rncorporated less Than Significant No Impact Impact Issues and Su ortin Information Sources a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important '3xamples of the major periods of California histo or mhisto ? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current ro'ects, and the effects 01 robable future ro'ects? c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial advE,rse effects on human beings, either directl or indirectl ? . Comments: " " " 17.a. This site has been previously graded and is surrounded by industrial, commercial and high density residential development and does not contain any viable habitat for lish or wildlife species. This is an action that will lead to .In in-fill development project and it does not have the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the Ilumber or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Unless impacts are anticipated as a result of possible future spring USFWS protocol surveys for the aCB, California Gnatcatcher, or the. Riverside Fairy Shrimp, and if such surveys do not detect the presence of such species on the project site, no further mitigation is necessary, and therefore the proposed project would not have an impact on fish and wildlife species. 17.b. The cumulative effects from the project are not considered significant because the subject site will be developed in conformance with the City of Temecula's General Plan and Development Code. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the G"meral Plan Environmental Impact Report. Given the project's consistency with the General Plan and Development Code, the cumulative impact related to the future development of the site will not have a significant impact. H.c. The parcel map and th'3 future development of industrial lots or buildings will not have environmental effects that would caUS'3 substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The site will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code and General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:IG P AIPA01-0418 Ell L1l1ylElIlIlIy Initial Study (GPA, SPA, ZC).doc 20 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CECA process, one I~r more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the fOllowing on attached sheets. a. Earlier anal ses used. ldentif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above check list were within the scope of and adequatedy analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effl!cts were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sls. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecilic conditions for the ro'ect. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. R:IO P AIPA01-()41a Eli LillylEIi Lilly Initial Study (OPA, SPA, lC),doc 21 . . . . . . ATTACHMENT NO.5 ADDENDUM TO PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED NEGATIVE DECLARATION R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\STAFFREPORT.doc 11 . . . CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Addendum to Previously Adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration For Creekside Center Shopping Plaza (PA04-0525) Backqround In November, 2002 the Temecula City Council adopted a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to modify the land use designation and zoning from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial on a 6.27 acre site located at the southwest corner of Overland Drive and Nicole Lane. A Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council in association with the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. The current property owner is requesting a Development Plan (PA04-0525) to construct establish and operate a retail commercial center consisting of two single-story retail buildings and associated on site parking on the proposed project site. Based upon staff's review of the proposed retail center project, a determination has been made by the City of Temecula to prepare an Addendum to the Negative Declaration. CEOA Basis for this Addendum State CEOA Guidelines, Section 15164(b) allows a lead agency to prepare an addendum to an adopted negative declaration..."if only minor technical changes o.r additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent negative declaration have occurred". Under CEOA Guidelines Section 15162 (a), when a negative declaration has been adopted for a project, no subsequent environmental review shall be undertaken for the project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one of the following: a. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require revisions to the negative declaration. b. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken that will require major revisions to the negative declaration, or c. New information of substantial importance for the project, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the negative declaration was adopted, becomes available. (CEOA Guidelines, Section 15162 (a)). Previouslv Adopted Neqative Declaration Proiect Description In November 2002, the Temecula City Council adopted a Negative Declaration to amend the General Plan to change the land use designation on the project site from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial (CC) and to change the zoning designation from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial (CC). R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Negative Declaration Addendum.doc 1 Proposed Proiect Description . The current property owner has made application for a Development Plan to construct, establish an operate a retail shopping center onsite consisting of two single-story retail building totaling 26,470 square feet with associated onsite parking facilities. A maximum of 10,000 square-feet of future sit-down restaurant space will also be developed on the portion of the project site under separate permit approvals. Summary of Impact Comparison Based on the scope of the previously approved Negative Declaration and new information associated with the proposed project, planning staff has determined that minor technical changes are necessary in association with Air Quality and Transportationrrraffic resource categories. The following is a comparison of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration analysis and proposed project analysis for those two resource categories: AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting- Sburces a. b. c. d. e. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air ualit Ian? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone recursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of eo Ie? v v v v v R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\Negative Declaration Addendum.doc 2 . Previouslv Adopted Neqative Declaration Comments Approval of these actions will not conflict with applicable air quality plans nor violate air quality or pollution standards. The site. has already been mass graded per approvals issued for Tentative Map 30107. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Proposed Project Comments The project applicant completed a 2002 URBEMIS Study in association with the proposed retail center project in January 2005. The study concludes that emissions associated with both site grading and building construction will not exceed applicable air quality significance thresholds as adopted by the Southern California Air Quality Management District. Therefore, no new air quality impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project: . '" Issues and Suppciiiinglnformation . Sources a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or con estion at intersections? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or hi hwa s? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safet risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e. ., farm e ui ment? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? Result in inadequate parking ca acit ? .' Potentially ;SIgni.fican! Irripacb . Potentially . Significant. Unless Mitigation . .. I neor orated: --J --J --J --J --J --J R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland lI\Negative Declaration Addendum.doc 3 g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bic de racks? ;j Previouslv Adopted Neqative Declaration Comments: Approval of these actions will not conflict with applicable transportation or circulation plans or standards. The applicant has submitted a traffic study prepared in January 2001. The study shows existing conditions and project buildout conditions for trip generation equivalency at the General Plan level. The submitted traffic study contains the traffic impacts generated by the development of five parcels within a larger project area than the three parcels being considered under the General Plan Amendment. The combined traffic impacts for the larger five-parcel project will be within the level of service limits required by the City's General Plan and Growth Management Plan. The future development impact of the parcels being considered under this environmental assessment will be less than the total number of trips identified in the traffic study. The traffic study indicates that average daily trip generation will be within acceptable levels as defined by the General Plan. The study has been reviewed and accepted by the Public Works Department. No new impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Proposed Project Comments: Based on the size of the site and the allowable Floor Area Ratio of .30 within the existing . Community Commercial zoning designation, the Public Works Department has determined that the following trip generation rates could occur in association with the development of the project site: Dailv Trips AM Peak Trips PM Peak Trips 5,966 139 549 (Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual) Based on the proposed project description for the retail complex, and a total of 10,000 square feet of future restaurant space, the Public Works Department has determined that the proposed project will generate the following trip generation rates: Dailv Trips AM Peak Trips PM Peak Trips 4,134 185 270 (Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual) Overall, the proposed retail center will generate significantly less trips than could be developed if the project site were developed to the maximum allowable density. Therefore, the Public Works Department has determined that the project will be well within acceptable trip generation . levels as defined by the General Plan. No new traffic/transportation issues are anticipated as a result of this project. R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland II\Negative Declaration Addendum.doc 4 . . . Conclusion The proposed project to develop a retail shopping center consisting of two single-story retail buildings totaling 26,470 square-feet on the 6.27 acre project site would not result in any new significant environmental impacts. In addition, the project would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Consequently, major revisions to the previously adopted Negative Declaration are not required and none of the other conditions listed in Section 15162(a) that would require the preparation of a subsequent Negative Declaration has occurred. Impacts associated with the two potentially affected resource categories evaluated in the previously adopted Negative Declaration (Air Quality & TransportationfTraffic) would be either unchanged or reduced. Other resource categories are not impacted at all by the proposed project. This conclusion is supported by the impact analysis included in this report and attached documentation. Therefore, no supplemental environmental review is required. Attachments 1. URBEMIS 2002 Air Quality Model prepared by McArdle Associates, January 2005 2. Southern California Air Quality Management District Air Quality Significance Thresholds R:\D P\2004\04-0525 Overland Il\Negative Declaration Addendum.doc 5 9512965226 01/31/20J5 10:04 FAX 9512965226 [//f!f.i'; - (;.) r~~ -;jf-''', ~ fr'1l--," ~.,"'...c ...,:f:_'~ or! " . - _v~. ~ _ ~ DAVCON HUNCO MPl ,i~t!:f<; ($.Y,ltC:i11Y' .,' {' DA VCON DEVI:LOPMENT, INC 42389 WINCHESTER RD~ SUITE B TEMECULA, CJ, . 92590 PH: (9(19) 296-5225, I 'AX: (909) 296-5226 FAXTRANSMlTIAL COVER SHEET SEND TO: FRfIM: MCARDLE &ASSO JIM PATTON, P.M. DA"E: 1/31/05 FAX, RE, (760) 431-7585 CREEKSIDE TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVER: AIR UALITY ANALYSIS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIOl'i S PLEASE CALL ME AT THE OFFICE JIM PATTON Ii!J 001/006 . . . 01/31/2005 10:04 FAX 9512965226 page: 1 URBEMIS 2002 For Windows File Name: P_t Name: P Loca tien: O. d Motor Vehicle 7.5.0 DAVCON RUNCO MPI I4i 002/006 C:\Program Files\~RBEMIS 2002 For Windows\Projects2k2\Creekside Centre.urb retail South Coast Air B<sin (Los Angeles area) Emissions Based on EMFAC200; version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (Pounds/Day - Summer) Construction Start Month and Year: April, 2005 Construction Duration: 6 Total Land Use Area to be Developed: 6.27 acres Maximum Acreage Disturbed Per Day: 0 acres Single Family Units: 0 ~ulti-Family Units: 0 Retail/Office/lnst!tutional/lndustrial Square Footage: 14000 CONSTRUCTION EMISSION ESTIMATES UNMITIGATED (lbs/C9Y) Source "*.,,* 2005*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust Off-Road Diese~ On-Road Diesel Worker Trips Maximum Ibslday Phase 2 - Site Grading Fugitive Dust Off-Road Diesel On-Road Diesel Worker Trips Maximum lbs/day Emissions Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel Bldg Canst Worker Trips Arch Coatings Off-Gas Arch coatings Worker Trips ASlt Off-Gas As Off-Road Diesel As On-Road Diesel Aspna t Worker Trips Maximum Ibs/day Max Ibs/day all phases *** 2006*** Phase 1 - Demolition Emissions Fugitive Dust Off-Road Diesel On-Road Diesel Worker Trips Maximum Ibs/day Phase 2 - Site Grading Fugitive Dust Off-Road Diesel On-Road Diesel Worker Trips Maximum Ibs/day Emission.s Phase 3 - Building Construction Bldg Const Off-Road Diesel Bldg Canst Worker Trips Arch coatings Off-Gas Arch Coatings Worker Trips Asphalt Off-Gas Asphalt Off-Road Diesel Asphalt On-Road Diesel Asphalt WorkeL Trips Maximum Ibs/day Max lbs/day all phases . ROG 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.13 0.36 0.16 10.65 0.00 0.09 23.55 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.67 23.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 NOx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 68.13 6.62 0.19 74.94 0.00 0.11 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 74.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.11 co 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 82.31 1. 36 3.72 87.39 0.00 2.11 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 87.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.09 2.09 S02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM10 TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.19 0.01 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 3.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PMIQ EXHAUST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.16 0.00 3.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PMIO DUST 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/31/2005 10:04 FAX 9512965226 Page: 2 Phase 1 - Demolition Assumptions: Phase Turned DE~ Phase 2 - Site Grading AS5urnptions Start Month/Year for Phase 2: Apr '05 Phase 2 Duration: 1.2 months On-Road Truck Travel (VMT): 268 Off-Road Equipment No. Type 1 Excavators 1 GraderS 1 Pavers 1 Rollers 1 Scrapers 1 Tractor/Loaders/Backhoes HorSE :Jower lE) 17~ l.3~ 11' 313 73 Phase 3 - Building construction Assumptions Start Month/Year for Phase 3: May '05 Phase 3 Duration: 10.2 months Start Month/Year for Subphase Building: Feb '05 SubPhase Building Duration: 10.2 months Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horse lower Start Month/Year for subPnase ArChitectural Coat .ngs: SubPhase Architectural Coatings Duration: 1 mont IS Start Month/Year for Subphase Asphalt: Feb '05 SubPhase Asphalt Duration: 0.5 months Acres to be Paved: 0 Off-Road Equipment No. Type Horse lower DAVCON RUNCO MPI Load Factor 0.580 0.575 0.590 0.430 0.660 0.465 Load E'actor Feb '05 Load Factor 141 003/006 . Hours/Day B.O 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Hours/Day Hours/Day . . 01/31/2005 10:04 FAX 9512965226 ~age: J AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer Source ROG Natural Gas 0.00 _Stoves - No summer emissions laces - No summer emissions caping 0.08 Consumer Prdcts 0.00 TOTALS (lbs/day,unmitigated) 0.08 AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES Source Natural Gas Wood Stoves - No summer emissions Fireplaces - No summer e~ssions Landscaping Consumer Prdcts TOTALS (lbs/day, mitigated) Area Source Mitigation Measures . . DAVCON RUNCO MPI Ii!I 004/006 ROO 0.00 Pounds pex Day, Unmitigated) NOx CO s02 PMIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.00 NOx CO S02 PM!O 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.58 0.00 0.00 o.oe 0.00 0.08 01/31/2005 10:04 FAX 9512965226 vage: q UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSION: Free-standing discount st TOTAL EMISSIONS fIbs/day) ROG 0.27 0.27 NOx 0.00 0.00 DAVCUN HUNCU MYl co 0.00 502 0.00 0.00 0.00 Does not include correction for passby trips. Does not include double counting adjustment for it ternal trips. OPERATIONAL <vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 2004 Temperature (F): 90 EMFAC Version: EMFAC2002 (9/2002) Uni t Type Summary of Land Uses: Free-standing discount st Fleet Mix: Vehicle Assumptions: Vehicle Type Light Auto Light Truck Light Truck Med Truck Lite-Heavy Lite-Heavy Med-Heavy Heavy-Heavy Line Haul > Orban Bus Motorcycle School Bus Motor Home < 3,750 Ibs 3,751- 5,750 5,751- 8,500 8,501-10,000 10,001-14,000 14,001-33,000 33,001-60,000 60,000 lb. Travel Conditions Urban Trip Length (miles) Rural Trip Length (miles) Trip Speeds (mph) % of Trips - Residential Trip Rate Season: Summer l{(J UUD/ UUU PMIO 0.00 . 0.00 0.00 trips / 26470 s~. ft. Size Total Trips Percent Type 56.10 15.10 15.60 6.90 1.00 0.30 1. 00 0.80 0.00 0.10 1. 60 0.20 1.30 Home- Work 11. 5 11.5 35.0 20.0 Residential Home- Shop 4.9 4.9 40.0 37.0 % of Trips - Commercial (by land use) Free-standing discount store Non-Catal/st 2.70 4.60 2.60 2.90 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.50 0.00 15.40 Home Othe 6.0 6.0 40.0 43.0 14.00 0.00 Catalyst 96.80 92.70 96.20 94.20 BO.OO 66.70 20.00 12.50 0.00 0.00 12.50 0.00 76.90 Commercial Commute 10.3 10.3 40.0 Non-Work 5.5 5.5 40.0 2.0 Diesel 0.50 2.70 1. 20 2.90 20.00 33.30 70.00 87.50 100.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 7.70 . C\.1stomer 5.5 5.5 40.0 1.0 97.0 . 01/31/2005 10:04 FAX 9512965226 .t'age: :;l DAVCON BUNCO MPI 14l006/006 Changes made to the default values for Land Use T: ip Percentages cas made T_et" has to the default values for Constructi(n overridden the Default Phase Lengths Changes made to.the default values ~or Area The natural gas option switch changed from on to ~ff. The wood stove option switch changed from on to otf. The fireplcase option switch changed from on to otf. The area souce mitigation measure option switch c~~nged from oft to on. Mitigation measure Central Water Heater: Rsdntl ~3ace Heat. has been changed from off to on. . Changes made to the default values for Operations . . SCAQMD AIR QUALITY SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS . 100 lbs/day 55 IbsJday VOC 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day PM 10 1501bs/day 150lbs/day SOx 150lbsJday 150lbs/day CO 550 Ibs/day 550 Ibs/day Lead 3 Ibs/day 3 Ibs/day N02 SCAQMD is in attainment; project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: 0.25 ppm (state) 0.053 ppm (federal) I-hour average annual average PM 10 24-hour average lOA !tglm' (recommended for construction) b 2.5 !tglm' (operation) 1.0 !tglm' 20 m' . annual geometric average annual arithmetic mean I uglm' SCAQMD is in attainment; project is significant if it causes or contributes to an exceedance of the following attainment standards: I-hour average 20 ppm (state) 8-hour average 9.0 ppm (state/federal) a Ambient air quality thresholds for criteria pollutants based on SCAQMD Rule 1303. Table A-2 unless otherwise stated. b Ambient air quality threshold based on SCAQMD Rule 403. Sulfate 24-hour average CO KEY: lbs/day = pounds per day ppm = parts per million ugfmJ = microgram per cubic meter ?: greater than or equal to . . ITEM #7 . . . . . Date of Meeting: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 30, 2005 Prepared by: Emery J. Papp, AICP Title: Senior Planner File Number PA04-0537 Application Type: Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) Planning Application No. PA04-0537 is a request for a Development Plan to construct seven commercial/office/retail buildings totaling 67,570 square feet on 6.88 acres (Sub-Area A of the approved Temecula Creek Village project). The project is generally located at the southeast corner of Hwy. 79 S. and Jedediah Smith Road. i:8'l Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial o Categorically Exempt (Class) l8J Notice of Determination (Section) 15162 o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\D P\20Q4\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\ST AFF REPORT.dote PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Completion Date: Dave Wakefield, Davcon Development, Inc. September 29, 2004 Applicant: Mandatory Action Deadline Date: March 30, 2005 General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay District NO.4 (PDO-4) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Rancho Community Church (under construction) Open Space (Temecula Creek) Vacant (Multi-Family Apartments) Vacant (Approved Creekside Plaza Development Plan) Lot Area: 6.88 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio 0.23 . Landscape Area/Coverage 70,000 s.1./25% Parking Required/Provided 290/289 BACKGROUND SUMMARY ~ 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. On May 1, 2002, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA01-0610 and PA01-0611, a Tentative Parcel Map and a Development Plan to allow for the construction of 123,000 square feet of combined commercial/office/retail floor space and 400 apartment units. After a change in ownership and several minor site plan changes due to cultural resource finds, construction of Sub-Areas C and D began in August of 2003. Sub-Area B is currently vacant. In 2004, Temecula Creek Village, LLC sold Sub-Area A of the approved project to Davcon Development. In doing their due diligence for the site, Davcon discovered that on-site control valves for the San Diego Aqueduct owned and operated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) could not be relocated, as was originally intended. It would be cost prohibitive to do so, and cost aside, doing so would also shut down a primary source of domestic water to San Diego. As a result, the MWD is not willing to relocate these facilities. Rather than apply for a Substantial Conformance Application for Sub-Area A, Davcon applied for a new Development Plan Application for the site on September 29, 2004. The new Development . Plan was designed around the MWD facilities to avoid them completely. The resulting site plan R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\ST AFF REPORT.dotc 2 . . . did not change the number of buildings, but slightly changed their locations and some materials and design elements of the buildings have changed as well. Entry to the site remains largely unchanged. Two points of access are provided, one off of Highway 79 South and one off of Jedediah Smith Road. The Jedediah Smith Road access drive has been "pushed" slightly southward to accommodate a proposed Walgreen's store at the northwest corner of the site. ANALYSIS Site Plan The proposed site plan closely follows the approved Development Plan in that it contains the same number of buildings, has similar building orientation and similar internal circulation. Decorative paving is placed at entryways into the site and in the drive aisle between Shop "0" and Pad "P' to demarcate pedestrian pathways. Sub-Area A is a retail and support commercial area encompassing the westerly 6.88 acres of the Temecula Creek Village project site. The proposed uses include a 3,700 square foot bank, a 6,040 square foot restaurant, a 14,380 square foot drug store, 19,000 square feet of speculative office space, and 24,010 square feet of speculative retail space. The restaurant, bank and drug store are oriented along the Highway 79 South frontage to encourage pedestrian access. The office and retail buildings are located along the rear of the site, which can be accessed from the public trail. The proposed project conforms to the development regulations of the PDO-4 zoning district including building setbacks, height, and Floor Area Ratio (0.23 proposed/0.5 permitted). Architecture The commercial buildings feature a contemporary architectural style that incorporates classical and modern features. All of the buildings will have a uniform Aegean copper metal seam roof as an element that ties this project to the Village Commercial area (Sub-Area C) of Temecula Creek Village. Tower structures will be a common theme throughout the project that will accent building entrances and also tie in with the Village Commercial area. The building exteriors will consist of a painted stucco body with two body colors, two accent colors, three trim colors, heavy use of stone veneer, hanging metal canopies, and canvas awnings. The applicant has submitted a material sample board that shows the proposed colors and materials that closely resemble, or are the same as, the colors and materials approved for the original Development Plan. Staff supports the proposed changes of color and materials. The project was reviewed by the City's consulting architect (Attachment #3) who provided comments to improve the overall design concept. The applicant has included many, but not all, of the recommendations made by the City Architect. In general, the applicant has lowered many elements of the roof and tower structures, mainly at building edges, to reduce the mass at these parts of the buildings to a more inviting pedestrian scale. Also, the roof treatment of the buildings has changed slightly to give the buildings a sense of balanced asymmetry. The height of many of the parapets has remained unchanged to provide for tenant signage. Staff feels that the applicant has met the intent of the comments provided by the City's Architect and supports the project architecture. R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\STAFF REPORT.dote 3 Landscapinq . The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen on-site parking areas and soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape approximately 70,000 square feet, or 25 percent of the site, which meets the landscape requirements of the Professional Office zone. The project will include a total of 235 new trees consisting of Japanese Crape Myrtle, Bottle Tree, Chinese Flame, Crape Myrtle, London Plane, Chinese Pistache, Queen Palm, and the two existing oak trees shall be protected in place. Of the original approved plan, only the Chinese Flame and the Queen Palms remain. The previous approval also called for Fern Pines, Engelman Oaks, and Mondell Pines. The project has been conditioned that the tree palette for the perimeter landscaping match the previously approved landscape plans for Temecula Creek Village to ensure a consistent streetscape along 79 South and consistent plantings along the public trail at the rear of the site (Condition No. 13). Staff has no objection to changing the internal site landscape palette. Access. Circulation and Parkinq Traffic impacts were analyzed under the Mitigated Negative Declaration that was approved for the entire Temecula Creek Village Development. The project proposes the same intensity of development as the previous approvals, the ingress and egress for the site has not changed, and only minor changes to the internal circulation system are proposed. Primary access to the site is unchanged and provided by a full-turn movement signalized intersection at Highway 79 South and Jedediah Smith Road. Right in/right out access is also provided from a main project entry off of Highway 79 South at the east end of the project site (Sub-Area A). As a result, staff . has determined that the previous traffic studies are adequate and no additional studies were required to process the new plan. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plans and determined that there is proper access to the site and that internal circulation is acceptable for emergency vehicle access with one minor problem area. The landscaped parking finger planter near the southwest corner of Pad G did not meet the Fire Department turn radius criteria. As a result, this planter had to be "trimmed" to meet the turning radius requirement. The end result is that one parking space had to be removed and the landscape planter was actually made shorter to facilitate turn movement, and wider. This is why the site plan is one parking space short of the Development Code requirement. With this minor change to the site plan, emergency vehicle access throughout the site can be achieved. Staff supports the proposed change. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ~ 1. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Negative Declaration and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached . conditions of approval. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaz.a\STAFF REPORT.dotc 4 . . . FINDINGS Development Plan(17.05.01 OF) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan identifies retail, commercial and office uses as typical uses in the Professional Office designation. Retail, commercial and office uses are permitted uses in the Planned Development Overlay NO.4 (PDO-4) zoning district of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Planned Development Overlay District NO.4 (PDO-4) Standards in the City's Development Code. The proposed project has met the development standards relative to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 2. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 3. City Architectural Consultant Comment Letter - Blue Page 8 R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\STAFF REPORT.dote 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\STAFF REPORT.dote 6 . I' ..! . ! 1 I, I' i I, I' , I ~ [ I i. ! . ! i , . , I: I' j ~ r: , r Il If I. 1 r , i ~ ., r i, .t;; [' ,. <( N <( ---.J 0....<( ~O tl]<c a;::---.J 0::> o <(w ---.J~ ::>w 01"- W ~ W I"- "~. . 0<11 Zw -I- f-:::> ZOOo W -en 0...., 2<(N o...oen 00::<( 0::0 . -I w - WI-::l >00:::> wwo OIw 0:2 zZw 0$1- o.lil . >~ .e:( "" o v .'1 >-, ..- (0 o ;f :t:l:: f- o W -" o 0::: 0... o e:( /-', . , . , I , ! . i I ~ dl m 15 ~ a ~. -J '. ^. a ffi ~e; ~ = 1lI 1lI ~ III ~ llIll1 1lI "" U ~;i B~ HU~H ~ .1 g~i i i i m i ~ ~ h Iltli Ih ~dl g: ~I ~~Uli; wijaUi ~ ~~ i; i I a~~ " s I- I ~h l~ i li ~"~ ~ limu i 'Ihli ,gUiH ~..- il ii1", :=l. ~ ~i ~ I ~ if Ii I ~ h ",hi i! '~In" i B~ ~ ~.q ,; ~ ~~n!J~nh ~i ~ r 0 i ~~ I~ ~ 1 i~ -I UiI III IU i i~ d g~ j;;{ ft:i N r-HUls uh oU Uh ~~ ~ ~ -._ i.a a,.. - ~~ j ~ [-~ i"i i~:~ I ~~~ ~. I ~i~ .i~ .~s~ .~.;~ , ' , . , , . [ . I, " I, 1111111 .. II I: ! r I i, II II II II ~ I II i!ig II Ii , I II III II III II IIII11 LIIIII 1~~1 II ! ~i' II II [g II IIEIII II ~III 1111 III 11,111 j 1II11 " ;11111 ill III I 1I11II IIII11 IIIIII .: l~\ IIIII . ~H 1III IIIII I \ II \ I I \ \ III \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \I \ \ 1\\ \ II \'\.\ 11.1 , ' I I , ' i i, 1 , t: r' L r: I j. \ [ l[ I' 1 I, I! 1 ' L I [ 1: , ~ HBII ,I ,'_' j ~N'~:, I~ , g~ ~f ~i ------------ So-9l-tQ lVlllnans 3ij NYld.lJOl'ld~a,"" , "" III!' "U!! ~' c[ GJ l1J ~ <::( :5 o l1J , ~ ,~ Lul Q)! :<:;, ~I o! I ::2! :<:; (,) ~ l:':!l !lJ ~', ' ~ Cl: Ci5 <<: I , . (j ~I ~-! a51 5:: Sl ' ~ ~- 51 ~I <( i, Cl I r' 1\ r' i. , - i i I \: " I. r; If J: 1 i ! ~ J , j ~ p [' i - l. S\)-SI-fO 1W"llWlOns WId l/f3I'ldQ-rn](J .- '. ~i ~~~Io;l .... 'II """r--' .:.: " =t\ ~ll~ u~d L__j J >0:-\\ ~~ \\ r--' """\] C.oJ J\, II I' . <;':l\' '. \j ;;:)\ . .. J\\"""'''...... =1 -II l< Ii " ~g ~10; ;, II ;; , , , r--~ c-- , ., , , ,. ., , , ..1 , , , , , , .,. , , .., \d;\\ II 1\ r~.:r L__J u; ~ "' . g~,.' ~_i'g" "" ~!"I' o.~ ,~ o,il' ~~l1~ A~ r--' L__J l-- '_'c..~0 r--' _-:J , j\ ,..Ii .....<f , i~ . ;~ .1', /, EB~ c "" <i; 1*1 Iii!! ~,I;I -jlll ,'I :r: LlJI a.. <.91 o ;z:' :r: ~! U) O! , I ;z: ~ ~! lJ.. ~I o :Ei o (,). ~ ~I o ' o G:' ~ ~ m lU n::: o :s :J o ~ ~ <..:i ~I .....-! aJ! ::;;1 a.. I ~! itl Q. ;z:i 01 ~i ~l r '-1 , \ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , d , \ , , , , I~/,\ ,_J, /' '.1 ' ,--JJ./ <f \ ~I// ; '-- 1='1 C1 ,- ! m;1 _~ if "I .[ 1 !I 'it I u ,r "=1 It=, j! 'J \f ---, , , '---.. i' \ , , 'I I I ~ r I, I I ~~ '1 'I ',I I r--.., l__.... ~-'#Jo- l; I /r/1 C1 . / ~ t:'=! - H CI) .:, ;;;,i' ::;,;1 W I ' I-\J-~J :-:/ r--:' j l__J ! , U tnu:':j- No;!~ti = .'0' I ~Ojjj "o"l! , c:~ ~ h~ :1 ro-Sl-~O WllImlnS hVld llHlIdOl3i\3Q (Y) , <<: 1*1 1\;11 . i!lH .lld .1111 CO lUl Cl ~. C[ <:, ~I <: 0' I ~ ~I lL.. 0 0 ~I 0 :r:i ~ 01 0 ~i 0 , i:i:' ~ ~ I I .. ,- ,. a III . f , " I I I , , , , , , " , , , , , , , , , , , " , '~l , , , , '. ~~ Ii .,1 h5 ~ Q. (j ~ ~I t-"J djl 0::: :::;;' <.) Cl..1 '<( ~l :s it! . <.) Cl. <:1 LU 01 ~ aJ ~I f-.:: (5' I( \: ~ . ":1 '=--/1.-=11 ,--, J . Ii ~ '----.. / II I! ," - . do ;t1l" ',/ -I; ~ ';;'i "I r: !,---, . - \ .---; {"/ ~ I . \, '-~ I [[ ;~i If I' jr, '/ 'I .I / / ~t<:""":_ C,'] ! '\- i -- I \. I/ ;/' , / 1I --- " 1 , l ~ j !! l' .1 hI " ~l ;j.' ,I " ',. i '/' <;O--1lI--"\:O""llI"ansNYld~ll'OO , . i . ! ' L,--.-J . 0 lU 1- & ~f iJ5 ~! O' <: I I' ~ ~! 0 I "- ~l 0 :i:1 0 01 ~ ~ ~I 0 . 0 ~ ii -------- ------ ~ ! ! . , ",. 't' ~ ,~/ I; N <:( ct GJ lLl ~ .<:l:: :5 Cl ~ ..~ S .~ fl [1 ![ -1 i. r l (j ~I I-~f ail ~! QI ~! ail Cl. :;::1 01 01 :::>1 cst [1 ( ! I: r-r 1, ! ' I, I' , . , , I, L ( , 1 ; [I I. I! I 1.. I; f r II r r . j. - - ~ I r II l' 11 W-9l-rol'l'illI'UlfISlNldlNJl1dQU\3l] . ~u.d .~ c.rH 0.. :2:' ~ ~! '? OJ :2: ~l .~ Of u.. ~ o 5:1 o oJ ~ Cl:1 u:: <<:, o o ii . ~0 IT] ~l l1.J ro I n:: ~[ (.) 0..1 01 "'C ..... I :5 ~i (.) OJ l1.J 15 I ~ ~I l::! dl . r' \\ \ \ \ \ . I' \J I .. I, Ir .. !: (' '> .J .'-- f' i I, i' I Ie !: I ! I, !.[ 1 (' Ii I J 1 [ l 3dOl5lf.)lJOOll ;" 1'-- -, , ' , ' '-____~__1 , ;; II ill .!! ill __0 . 1-- -., , , ' ...._____..1 , ...... ".~'- / / + . (l ~ ;~ . '~ l IIIII ffi" \I7~ <0 ..;; , t11 In! jihi .JJt! ,ll >O-91-fOl'fUJI'IBrlS tNldLN:Jl'ldOl3rOO 1 /1 / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I( 1:$" I) 1 I 1 1 I 1 ' I ' 1 . I'" ! 1 I , ""'1$)1""'" ;------.., , ' , ' '-_____...1 I! ,J 'd u: W ~ ~j'" :;f !II ~"!l i. . "I' . ~g'l!l, c...:5.8 l!~~ 1'--- ., , ' , ' .... __.J """"lS-"..... .0-.'" I' ! ! ! . .. 1 ( ) ;; ~I Cf. :?:' , ~I :?: 0' ~ f2! lJ.. 0 o ~l o :r:i ~ O' o 0::1 o <<::(! tC J ;J ;~ '1 Ii " .1 N <:( ~ (j <" ~ ~I Lu \-.,1 fLu:?:' )" _~ ~l .= '-J 0..1 ~:S ~! ::::> Et! Cl q. J.. :?:; ~ 01 Lu ~I f-.,: dl J 1 LLl_LLLJ1WlJ . ... ... ,.. ... '. .. ......... ... . ... .' ..... ... ... ...... ..... . . 00000 \ It , '. , '. '. , , , , '. , , , '. 'I \ , , . , \ , \ , '. , '. \p-o , ... , , '. Ii 'I 11- M ,i '"1 -I Ii d u! ~ r' '" I i , . ! : I ( . ! ' I ~ I' l. 1 ' i I. ~." I' l, lj ;:;;;Il.ti oil ir il '-'.!"'-\} u: OO'j o~ ~ ~l~~ ~iill ~111!i a..~ ll~.. r' , , I. .. r, , , l...J ! r, , , .' I I u r' I, 1: I I I ,,-----~--- 7\ I "" ~ // r I" / r I ',~ // I I ~"""'" 'X/""""", I I . / " I / " Ij> ..----- ~ ~ I , , , , , , , \ \ , , , , , , , , 1 @ c' ~ f l o;o-gl-rol'i!ll/l811SWldlN3l'1d013AJQ ,--, , , , , , , , , , , L__...J "'- <i: l!!t JI;!! .!1lI .lld I,ll . w.. UJI Q C!H Sl: ~, en.: cH . O' ~ 1 ~ ~! o ::s l:':!1 o 5'::1 ~ 01 o ~I o ' ii c . c A ~ (j ~ ~I t-~ f a]1 0::: ~I 0 0..1 ~ 3! ~ UJI . 0 Q. <::1 Lu 01 .~ ~I ~ til co , ;O-9t-rOlVllIi'IIlns~OOl'ldOl]lOO "'C " 11!!1 .' f" .. ~ l"l! . j , . , ;~ .!lil , .'1'1 , ,1111, , ',II , fr- ~ , EB'" , ~ , I ,. , , .~ - .. ~ Q) lJ.J1 Q Q). I <:1 ~. Cf i?! i. I, , ~!:l* <: O' r.lli I 1 11 g !ll:l '1: ~ [21 II' 0 ,Il, .1 l1.. ~l "'!I III 0 ~I h ,,!l! 0 5:! !: == ~ 01 ~. 0:::, 0 ~I 0 ii ., .. I I ::J 1. I , r-;--- ~ I, I \ ", li / A ~) .,....."..,. \ " /~" t \~x \' / , I /r' \ / ~ , I / . L___ - It u: 0; I ~~f.r qa~_ :i ~!l!' 11,1 ! , , ~!II!' ~~~/;;~ )11 Ii ., . ~i~~~ 1I! :r g:S ~3~ i !I! ,Ii , .. ., t \ , '.I , II , .. , , .,....."..,. ~. I ! --r--/i (j , [5 ~i ,. " ~ // 1 \ ,,~/ \ 1--' i ! ! "-<f'( 'x/""~",, 1 LlJ ail / , I 0:::: :::;;1 / i , I / ~- , () 0..1 I r ":t: ~l :5 it! . () Q. LlJ <:1 01 i aJ ~I J-: ;:'it [ r , rJ. f!'~ I~ ~ Ii ~;q if I I' ~I II PI' ~I II d I 'il IL'~J' I! dt ~d nnHdn ~ g ~ ! ! I ~ .~. ~ i ~ ..! ~ S . i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ f>> , q n~ n.,d I n ~ I~ ouhHllIllU HUUIIIHI BBBGBGBGBffi~00 0000000~~ [' i~~' -~ , ~ 1111, Il!l , !IW i!lli !llll III . r r I a i::: ~ uJ ~ .~ , ~I ;, "" 0 ~ ';;:! ~! f2J ~I 5:1 ~t 0::, <1::, [ l J. a ~ ::;: "~ l- :I: (!) '0:: ~ a .'" CI; @), CI) ;;;:' o j:.:: ~' Uj (!) ,~ 5:1 :5 tl:l . r ~ Ie ! ' I ! l, J: is ';;: 0 r f::; c_p: ~ .Sl: hS, ! ;~ l(j l(j '<:( 0:: ~ rt 1 'l1i 0 ($ 0:: 0:: m ~I ,U; ~ Lll ;;;d I 5 ~l u.1 01 . ::s ~! :::::> m () Lll ~i r ~ ~I I ~ L 2i, ! ili '" w r-1' ~ 1 ' ~ i , "' w 1;< ,. I: '" U> g ~ I' , I I ! I l ! I I [ I I . Ii I , , I , , r r I ) ! ! f I i i , I r I i ~- - 1 , i.l ! ~ I ill I~ I i II III ~II III III n H~ ~pl nHqdn~ Hpd~ Ilq~ HuhpP~ ~ ~ ~~. ~ ~tt ~ · i.~. i' ~ ~ . . . S . i ~ Hlnnqlgn dU!PUi~~ Hdh2i~dn dnHn~n! 8888B8888~@@@0000.0000000 , ~ .lU I i ~i ~J ot . i f3i It!l i}f ~l <ei , [0 a Cf. @) 0). .:;:. o f:;: ~ .~ Uj <!> .:;::. q .~ ::i !Q ~.. Lt. ~.. ill 0::. o <:( -J :::>.. () ~ ~ tS ~l ~l .< ~I Q.I 01 ~! ~J 6i 0' ;:>o! C'ii r ~ ~ l'}il t ~ '(II III ill II h L I ~B IHtql. I~~~IH~IIJ' 1[' n~n"~ ~Ip~ nnqn i "r~: II i II II I hill HI Ii II II Hi . ~n!L~~BL. HUB~U.~ , .' .. 8BBBB138813IIDEltmIID 0000000~0 r r [ , .' I' i i, :;;: Q ;.i=:: "-S; m It !tl I j I. I' I I. I 1. l: I' {; 1 I .J [ [ .5 j::: .~ Uj 1 f ! If 1) r! L , . , , 1 ~ LJ r~ . I!hi _jld ,II ~ ~ ~l . ~. <: ,. tEl t 0, ~'I u g!i .S: I 0 ~l "". .<;: Q ! .1- , :t: P fQ ll:: & :r: c(). @) ~ . 0 i=:. :'3: I.IJ td cr> ~ ;) '.:j' m ..~ Q __r:: s: ~. ~ Q IE ~. . cE ti ~. ~I !J.t .~ ( lli ~~ a: ~t r.. n t '-' 01 S rut :::) :s; o ~i lLJ.ai ~ ~I /.lI ''''C f r- CH . I' i l , ~ ~. , ~I.' f!h ~ . ~ !i! ,~p d! . i' II $. ,i! ~ fl q i l d ~ 5 . 'i in HL htl. !iHln~lil "'I U"n.. do.' iPqP~ ~ i~. nh~~LnPI ~d!ilq!~i1 1!1~~l~~ii!I~' ~~~~~~~~I~' ;:: in!Uliniill UinlnlU~ GBBG8GBGG~~@@ 00000000~0 r ~ ! ' l. :;;: o R ~ ~ I' I, \ '. ! ~ I i . " L I; 11 [ r " 11 <= ,0 ! .~ [ ; If u ~ 1 : i: Ij r , I !~ ,;~ ! Jill< a m ~ ".n:: ,II!l 'l!I~ }I'.. , A,hl -lid ,II ~ ~ ll..ll . ,~. ~ "'. ~ ;:;;:. ~J , I f2} <..:l.. }Hl -. . ::c I <..:lr 0::. "1:: fl ~ ::c Ql @} Ql a "j::: .~ ~. ~ S .;:} co :<:( 5 Q.. Q ~ ~1 IJJIJJ J-: I ;<::. n:: ~ I' U gsl :s ~! :;) \.!Sf ()<::: ~ oi ..:::: uI ~ ~I r"t , , i , i I ~ ~ ~!q'l! 1.11 ~ Ii dl III a ~ I ~ h ~ n H~iq~ nni~ 111l! i Haq!1 h.~~ Hnd~~ h ~ np~fgaHnl H::pPi-l~ ~lhUdlliUI uUdlBUi BB8G88BB800~@~ 00000000000 ! : r: I' I, a j::: ~ i:i:J ~ I' i. I' i. I' I 1. I' I, I:. . I; [ [ .' II 5 j::: ~ i I I H u 1! 1 r , ,. L~ r f Li .<: o j::: ~ UJ h :t: (!) il: <: o j::: :g; ~ h a ,ff ~ a.. m l1J a:: o S :::> o ~ ~ ~~ '~ ~ ~ III" ,~ Mr ~ i liJ I ~ (!)! ~ ;;;::, ~! O' . I f21 0' ~I 5:! . ~Ii <<:, 1t- a 0': @ .~ Q t-:: ~ .~ LU .~ .Cj .;,! :::> co . <i ~l 1-'[ ;;;::, ~l &1 ~!l. ~i ;;;::' 01 ~f ~I [' , I I, ~ ~ ! PI Ii j I H dr, Ih dllLI n H~ f~d BHlnl~lI~ . . . . ii i ffi i ~.~ ~ ~ a;] g is. ~ ~ i ~ UHn~ ~ql; ~~U!~i ~p 111111111111111(111111111 .~~.,._.i!...~ ~~<~~~5~'''~ 8888888880000 00000000000 ! I I' , , a j:: ~ ~ h ,~ I' I. I' ~ Ii n U [J U !l -. ~ -.Q ,~ ~ Uj (l: us '(l: 1 r 1.1- a j:: ~' IlJ n:l i ~, Q. ~ ill a::: <..) ::s :::) <..) llJ m .. t-:. '*1 d!;!l '<tl.1 .1\11 I,ll . i UJ I ~ ~i ~ ~J 0'" , I ~! t.) ~l ~l gl "1:1 , ~ ~ @ ~, 0, i:::: ~ oj (!) <:, a ~ :s (l) <J ~I 1-:'1 ;z:~ ~l gs: !Jji ::;;:! ~J ~i ~I de---. f--. r"-, ( ~ I " ~ r' ! . I j i ! ' I . !J . II I II ql di LI w lU U B p~ in~ H[!nqn~ ~ i ~ ! ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ i ~ --n .~ jil . - ~ - . ~ . 3 I ~' . UH!in~p- ',., [ ~ f ~ ~ - I I ~ i . g ~ ~ . ~ ~ ! ~ ~ < ~ . I · · gg-d~H~r' ~ ~I !' ill f I I ~ i I I. i ~ ~~~ ~~ j " i nn~nU !l " l" ElElElGElBEl88@@]@J@J 000000*000 ~ ~! 0:::. f' Oa f2! t:l ~l [ r :tV fEl t, q;f , B <;: I: 0 j::: j::: I, ~ ~ ~ \1j I' Ii; I- J:: ~ I ,<.'J i. .... 1i: 8> I' 1;3 j @) I U) . I, a j:;: ~ ,..J. I; l(j Q) < Q "", I [ ::i (Q II .' Il ~ 0 j::: .", ~ r r l(j 1-, ~ !l B a: ! r c[ 0 j, ~' ~l '.-> ~ 1--, ,<:> 1 [ a:: ~t . () 0.:' 01 <t:: ~i , r :5 ~i ! i () LJ lU <I a1 Of , , ~, I! J-:: '3: ~ , , Ci! i, ,> I' . r' i J A M ~c: ~~ ," Y'':;! -:::111 m I! I ",' , I: :' y~ :~ 'g.... ~~: I: ~~, A~ €G~1i1 ~W~ 6:1:(4 ~ru oy ! : SO-9I-rolYUJntlllS Iff1d J.NJJIdOl3A3O a ~ "* 1*1 II;I! ~lf" i11I .!Id 'ill I~ fJs l~ N~ _u ~w \ , I~, "'~ "" '. ~w , 03 E9~ ~ " I . , . I: "~l ;.;~ ~ Q 0 IT] ~I 1-,"1 Lu rEI a:: ::;;;1 () 0..1 "'<: ~! '. S > UJI () 0; \ Lu <:1 \ 0' \ ~ ~I \ 1--= (!i! ~'. ~ [ ! , , i [ r , I I I U r i ! 1 . - I I 1 i L1 , I 1 ~~h~ ~;~i o;d"~ ~ig5 Eo ~ o I ~ ,. " II '1 I' 'I. ~ ~ o I ~ 1j ! dl !nil ~I }1-lli!! I ( Ill~ t ~~ml!hiJ,llhu1!1!i!i ifll'llbi\lli . = Ill. .Un.llfil,Lolll.1 1 j!i' u~ . ill I',. !ii 'iii .n .n ,. j">, - !- ::; !. , Hi <: :s 0.. C,) [g UJ .::;;; 2 o 5: Llil Q). <:, ~! O' I' ~! f::!! :r:i C,)" a:: 1 ~I f' , ! ; r, , t. ,. , I. r: I r: ! : ! ' r: l. ! . Ii [ : !! lJ [[ [ ! !r u 11 1 : , I l.i [i ......~.......... .....__.........~..- 11, . Iii till lil'l~, ii, O. . . it. ~ ~i ~~ III """ ill Ii I ~ Ii il! ; 8i.' i !!i'li II1I iil'ld f1lhi~1 " !Ill ~"''' III! if Ihl ":Il>l Ill; li:,! li!- ~!!li ~ <- C') '" o. j.\.' ll.~1 " ~. . " i~ iil ~1 ~ {1111:j'I~I.~Td' i6~ f<:!Hh!" ~ .:': l!: .11: ., .11 .I,W!'.'....... . ""'lIi L.l. "'11 '11 1'1 I". II" "jdllh~,lllllllllll '11111111111111111111 Ji v Q I I Ii I:U I '\ ' I; ',' I 1\ i I , \' I \ , I \ \ I I . I ! 'i l~ i-' !Ii lil i! . iI' II " ~-I' I I i . {~i! "',I 1'1 i . i! i! I! i. >i! . '~-~~~ /0, I, ~~~=:~~~o~~ ~~ mmITllQl~II' ~ 3~Vll~ ~33~J VlnJ3~31 ~~ ~lii'W~ "'IiID"L~.I'\I!ilI!l'''''''~~Ili'IlUiWl'lIBlIIlUlt'~.....'IJ'' I: [ : !: L " j, I' I ( . , I: I! [i J !J f [ ! f L . 1 ' tj ,.....~ .....~ za ~........... . "..-.-- "''''. '" '" '" . . i III 1= ".1 IS s laIU.; IIl11bll S i ( I I 0 I .. tj ~ ,J,iJ~, Ii i 'Jr i, Iii i illlhll'm .L III on 1:1 I:, I 11 5 ..... .. . . , JAIII In! I: k I II ! 1'. .. · . i " : 1:1 ~ I . I I' Ii' ~! i "lli\ aill.I.I.! ~~ II. " , ~ :, n I ,PI ~l J r, 1\1, ~q Uti ~' gl · ~ \ \1 ~ ~ I I I ~., , , \, Ul . Os m fA o ~ lJ ~I ,', 04f ~ I ,'" g- ..::';.:t="_ II~~ 1-~.'-'-'~t:= '::>NI 'lN3nd013l\30 NOOAVO INld i!1~m= V1n:BYG!..:lO.AlO '6L AMH otIIJKId DlIl. . : .. 3~VlllII >l33HJ VlnJ3t'l31 AlIVNI.113lld 0 I ~! 0 ~lIl".Y~ "IiIIiD'L~I"BIlfIHllir'D~~iIf'IUI'!Il'lI--~"""Y [: 1 ! r , I , [ I i . r CJj(~ Cl ~~ ~~ Cl i , I I r I I , [ I I 1 1 I . (~~ za ~ i ! J JI II I ~ . . 11k k k k . ~ I IIIPI I OlLIL1LI11 ! IE uhn I . . :;lClI ~' .r~ II p~: ~. ra I I ~~ I I I I ~.u . 0 8~ ~o-tf . I 10," '~N' 1..:r.;d~NO,,^VO """"...... .~l n~ 'I Vln:l3YOl .:K> All:> 'BL AMH HWXllHlOW IWt III"RlHS' I 3:)\1'11111 >l33~:l \1'ln:l31"l31 AllY"'Om"d '1lIN~ "IIlIlIft..~nntf~~~lr:I'II.IIIYlI"'~""'Y rf J: Ii ~ i It I l. !: I r I' I. [' ~ [ [ II I I I I ,11,1 !lI! I I'll: I I iii I II I I~ I I II I I II l, I ..L' I t_L III I: I III n III li~f 1\11: 1 1~ ~,I Ill! l I I I I \1\ 1\ I rJ 11 [[ H Ii . I r Ii L,l; r l ~...u....... "'............... ~ nlll~IILlilJ ~lInl~ 11._11 ~ J~II~LIJI J ~ L ~ l!!!'riIH'! '" ~ L S. "h h ~H I Ul' I 08! I Ul ....l! I ~ i I I 81, , ~ ~ f]:' o ,- ~! ;.', "'A~ 1I111.:"C Z~ . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek: Plaza\ST AFF REPORT. dote 7 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0537, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT SEVEN COMMERCIAUOFFICElRETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 67,570 SQUARE FEET ON 6.88 ACRES (SUB-AREA A OF THE APPROVED TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PROJECT). THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HWY. 79 S. AND JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 961-010-006. WHEREAS, Dave Wakefield, representing Davcon Development, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0537 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0537 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA04-0537 on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA04-0537 subject to conditions of approval and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA04-0537, hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.D10.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan identifies retail, commercial and office uses as typical uses in the Professional Office designation. Retail, commercial and office uses are permitted uses in the Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PDO-4) zoning district of the City of Temecula Development Code. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc I 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public . health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Planned Development Overlay District No.4 (PDO-4) Standards in the City's Development Code. The proposed project has met the development standards relative to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15162 applies when a previous Negative Declaration or EIR has been approved for a project site and conditions on that site have not changed. The project is consistent with the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application numbers PA01-0610 and PA01-0611 (Development Plan and Tentative parcel Map), and further environmental review is not required. This project will be conditioned to comply with the Mitigation Measures adopted for the development of this site. Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA04-0537, a request for a Development Plan to construct seven commercial/office/retail buildings totaling 67,570 square feet on 6.88 acres (Sub-Area A of the approved Temecula Creek Village project) with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reierence. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 30th day of March 2005. . David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ss I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30'h day of March 2005, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 4 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0537, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT SEVEN. COMMERCIAUOFFICElRETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 67,570 SQUARE FEET ON 6.88 ACRES (SUB-AREA A OF THE APPROVED TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PROJECT). THE PROJECT IS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HWY. 79 S. AND JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 961-010-006. WHEREAS, Dave Wakefield, representing Davcon Development, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0537 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0537 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA04-0537 on March 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA04-0537 subject to conditions of approval and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinos The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA04-0537, hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Professional Office (PO) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan identifies retail, commercial and office uses as typical uses in the Professional Office designation. Retail, commercial and office uses are permitted uses in the Planned Development Overlay No. 4 (PDO-4) zoning district of the' City of Temecula Development Code. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUT10N and COAdoc 1 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public . health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Planned Development Overlay District NO.4 (PDO-4) Standards in the City's Development Code. The proposed project has met the development standards relative to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The proposed project as conditioned is consistent with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15162 applies when a previous Negative Declaration or EIR has been approved for a project site and conditions on that site have not changed. The project is consistent with the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for Planning Application numbers PA01-0610 and PA01-0611 (Development Plan and Tentative parcel Map), and further environmental review is not required. This project will be conditioned to comply with the Mitigation Measures adopted for the development of this site. Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Cornrnission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA04-0537, a request for a Development Plan to construct seven commercial/officelretail buildings totaling 67,570 square feet on 6.88 acres (Sub-Area A of the approved Temecula Creek Village project) with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Ternecula Planning Commission this 30'h day of March 2005. . David Mathewson, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] . R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30'h day of March 2005, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R;\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0537 Project Description: A Development Plan request to construct seven commercial/office/retail buildings totaling 67,570 square feet on 6.88 acres (Sub-Area A of the approved Temecula Creek Village project). The project is generally located at the southeast corner of Hwy. 79 S. and Jedediah Smith Road, known as Assessor Parcel No. 961-010-006. DIF Category: TUMF Category: Retail Commercial/Service Commercial/Office Retail/Service MSHCP Category: Commercial Assessor Parcel Nos.: 961-010-006 Approval Date: March 30, 2005 Expiration Date: March 30, 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. All underlying Conditions of Approval for Planning Applications PA01-0610 and PA01- 0611 shall apply unless superseded by these conditions. 3. All Mitigations Measures adopted for Planning Applications PA01-061 0 and PA01-0611 shall apply and shall be implemented. 4. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 5 5. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, conceming the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 6. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 7. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 9. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. No sign permits, including center identification signs, shall be issued prior to approval of a comprehensive sign program. 8. 10. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits contained on file with the Planning Department. 11. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 12. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. 13. Perimeter landscaping shall conform to the previously approved conceptual landscape plans for Temecula Creek Village to ensure a consistent streetscape along Highway 79 South and along the Public Trail. 14. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaz.a\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 6 . . . . 15. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. 16. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. 17. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Exhibit "0" (Color and Materials Board), contained on file with the Planning Department. Buildinq Bodv Description/Color . Main Wall A (Stucco): Main Wall B (Stucco): Accent Color A: Accent Color B: All buildings - Plaster cornice and trim: Windows & Doors: Eaves, Projecting Cornices, Corbels Hanging Metal Canopies: Standing Seam Metal Roof: Awnings: Stone Veneer: Frazee 8684M Frazee 8231W Frazee 7754M Frazee 82440 Frazee 8742 M Arcadia Medium Bronze AB-4 Frazee 88350 Frazee 88350 Aegean Copper Canvas, John Boyle #21 OMS "Cranberry" Eldorado "China Mountain Ledge" 18. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by the Director of Planning's prior. approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that the Director of Planning determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. The Director of Plannihg may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which.case the real party in interest may appeal the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. . R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 7 19. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 20. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 21. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department and Public Works Department. 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. 24. The applicant shall submit a sign program application, sign program application fees and a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of a building permit. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. 25. 26. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. f. An agronomic soils report shall be submitted with the construction landscape plans. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaz.a\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 8 . . . . . . around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. 27. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. 28. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. 29. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the project, which shall consist of masonry walls, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. 30. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". Prior to Release of Power 31. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. 32. Prior to the release of. power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, all mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the roofline or behind architecturally integrated screen walls. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment or roof equipment is visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide architecturally integrated screening subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. 33. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, existing 3- ply rolled roofing shall be fully screened from public view. If upon final inspection it is determined that any rolled roofing is visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site or from areas on-site that are open to the public, the developer shall replace the rolled roofing with the asphalt composition shingles approved for the project. 34. Prior to release of power, all site improvements shall be installed. 35. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R:\D Pl2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and CQA.doc 9 General Requirements . 36. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 37. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 38. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 39. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 40. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with. applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 41. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. . 42. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground. shaking and liquefaction. 43. 44. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post- construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction- phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include . R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 10 . . . a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post- construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 45. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Planning Department c. Department of Public Works 46. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 47. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 48. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to streets, or to a storm drain. 49. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps as Flood Zone "A" and is subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, the Developer shall demonstrate that the project complies with Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code for development within Flood Zone "A". A Flood Plain Development Permit is required prior to issuance of any permit. Residential subdivisions shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) prior to occupancy of any unit. Commercial subdivisions may obtain a LOMR at their discretion. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 50. The access taper on the south-west side of parcel must be designed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works. 51. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: 52. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. 53. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. 54. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COAdoc 11 55. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400. 56. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. 57. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. 58. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: 59. Improve Jedediah Smith Road (Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 60. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' RIW) to included dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 61. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. 63. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lights, signing, striping. a. Storm drain facilities 62. b. Sewer and domestic water systems c. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines 64. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 65. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 67. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaz.a\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 12 . . . . . . 68. and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 69. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 70. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 71. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 72. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.. BUILDING AND SAFETY 73. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 74. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 75. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 76. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 77. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. R:\D 1'\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 13 78. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. . 79. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access'Regulations effective April 1,1998) 80. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 81. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 82. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 84. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 85. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 86. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 87. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. . 88. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 89. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 90. Show all building setbacks. 91. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 92. Any previous existing conditions on this land or project will remain in full force and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here. . R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaz.a\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 14 . 93. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 94. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 95. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 96. . The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 97. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 98. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4) . 99. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COAdoc 15 100. Prior to' building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have . approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 101. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 102. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 103. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 104. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 105. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall . be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 106. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 107. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided wi~h the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 108. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland-vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A) 109. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A) . R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doe 16 . . . 110. Prior to map recordation a simple map in an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. COMMUNITY SERVICES General Conditions 111. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 112. All trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 113. Identify trash enclosure for Pad B. 114. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 115. All parkways, landscaping, including 12 foot wide landscape trail buffer, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to issuance of Building Permit 116. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 117. If additional streetlights are to be installed as a result of this project, than prior to the installation of street lights or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees to the TCSD, submit the approved Edison streetlight plans for the dedication of arterial street lights into the appropriate TCSD maintenance program. 118. Provide a connection from the sidewalk along the east side of Jedediah Smith Road to the trail along the southern property line, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Services. The trail along the southern property line can terminate at the connection point. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\Draft PC RESOLUTION and COA.doc 17 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 CITY ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANT COMMENT LETTER R:\D P\2004\04-0537 Temecula Creek Plaza\STAFF REPORTdote 8 ROGER CANTRELL AlA Architect . AIGP Planner M E M 0 RAN DUM To: Emery Papp, Senior Planner From: Roger Cantrell, Consulting Architect Date: February 10,2005 Subject: Temecula Creek Shopping Center (PA04-0537) Preliminary Review Based on a review of the drawings of the current phase and the approved drawings of the Temecula Creek Village development plan, I offer the following comments: Site Plan: I. Building Orientation and Placement Functional orientation is primarily toward the parking lot. Close-range street views of the four south buildings, from residential areas and a dedicated trail, are limited to the rear elevations. For the north buildings, orientations are ambiguous. The northeast building, Pad G, is similar to the south buildings in that it is entirely oriented to the parking lot, despite its frontage on Highway 79. Pad F, the bank, faces Highway 79 with its drive-through lane, while its pedestrian entry elevation faces the side so as to be visible from part of the shopping center and to some extent Highway 79. Pad A, Walgreens, is the only building that faces the street with a pedestrian entry. Its familiar comer entry aligns with the street comer, but the connection is only visual, and the orientation is made possible only through the provision of its dozens of parking spaces in front of that entry. Walgreens is further compromised by having its side and rear elevations facing the shopping center, so that it largely fails to contribute to the communal character of that center. The lack of visual or pedestrian linkages between the west side of the center (Walgreen's and the Pad B office building) and the rest of the center probably means that Walgreen's customers would likely drive the few hundred feet to the pad buildings to the east. The approved Temecula Creek Village development plan ~as even more internally-oriented, with a large overflow parking lot facing the major intersection. That allowed it the advantageous clustering of its retail and office uses. Unlike the proposed plan, it would not have led to driving movements between its' buildings. Thus the current site plan's nonconformity with the approved development plan deserves only a mixed review. With Walgreen's as an end use, integration into a more clustered site plan would require the drug store's side and rear to face the intersection. All things considered, the proposed plan should be regarded as a reasonable adaptation of the approved plan to new tenant needs. Temecula Creek Shopping Center Preliminary Review February 10, 2005 Page 2 of5 . At a more detailed level of concern, the plan departs from orthogonal orientation, allowing its south buildings to meander along a slightly shifting course. That could be avoided easily, but it also introduces slightly varied open spaces that work well with the informal character of the buildings. The site plan does not lend itself to a central feature around which the buildings can be massed. That would have allowed the offsite view of the project to have a more compelling and dramatic feeling than simply viewing the rears of buildings. Given that, it is important to simply provide the most effective landscape screening possible along much of the highway frontage: the service side of Walgreen's, the east side of the bank, and the rear of Pad Building G. 2. Walgreen's Service Elevation The site plan clearly indicates the service vehicle path of travel around Walgreen's. It appears that the open view of the dock elevation from the store's southeast corner should be largely screened from shopping center view by installing a planter with large shrubs at that comer outside of that path of travel. . 3. Walgreen's Drive-Through An awkward circulation path is created by the drive-through lane orientation. However, these lanes typically have a very low volume of use, allowing such conditions to exist without significant disruption. 4. Trash Enclosures The trash enclosures are questionable. East of Shop H is a trash enclosure that would be axially viewed down the major entry from Highway 79. Another small trash enclosure is situated in the middle of the lot between Shop D, Shop C, and Pad F. A more convenient and larger trash area is worth pursuing. 5. Parking Lot Lighting The lighting fixtures called out on the photometric plan seem utilitarian for a shopping center of the style submitted. Elevations: . Phone 818.762.6782 RC@ RogerCantrell.com . . . Temecu/a Creek Shopping Center Preliminary Review February 10, 2005 Page30fS 1. Pad Buildings in General There are many good qualities to the elevations. Individually, the store buildings are attractive. Their massing is varied and yet balanced. There is variety to their components that enlivens the designs, with enough continuity to achieve a high level of integrity. Sheet A-9 conveniently places all of the front elevations together. This is especially useful in viewing Shops C, D, and H, since they are closely spaced and nearly aligned along their storefronts. Once the buildings are viewed together, a major design concern becomes apparent. At this larger scale of consideration, the project loses its charm and interest. What was a pleasing set of elements within a single building becomes much less when repeated among several buildings. The repetition of these elements on all of the buildings might be intended as a way to achieve continuity and integrity. However, this is negated by the programmatic effect that is created. The visitor to this center would get the feeling of being manipulated as in an institutional setting. With a more formal or less eclectic style of architecture, the proposed amount of repetition among buildings could be acceptable. As proposed, each building has an informal combination of features that is very inviting, but not adaptable to repeated structures. The informal eclectic nature of the buildings raises the visitors' expectations of a rich, varied experience - an expectation that is betrayed by the building-to-building repetition. Aside from a more formal style, a larger selection of elements is called for, particularly on the retail and restaurant buildings. As presented, the office building is somewhat different, with a less punctuated rhythm and the hint of formal symmetry. This differentiation between retail and office should be accentuated by keeping the office building at a narrower range of variety. The drawings included in this memorandum show pad buildings C, D, and H together with separations to scale. The adjacent Pad B office building is also viewed together with those buildings, although it would be recessed considerably. No information was available on pad elevations, so the buildings were shown as if on level ground. In any event, the effect of grade change between buildings would not have an effect on the design issues discussed and illustrated here. The City Alternate drawings are intended as a guide to the strategy, but not necessarily the specific elements, recommended for use by the project architects. This would apply to all seven buildings of the center, since they uniformly use the limited selection of design features. A number of elements are shown in the City Alternate design or recommended beyond those illustrations: . nested gables and other roof variations Phone 818.762.6782 RC@RogerCantrell.com Temecula Creek ShopPing Center Preliminary Review Febmary 10, 2005 Page 4 of5 . . parapet step within buildings . keeping building scale low adjacent to patios between buildings . garden structures (arch trellis, curving pergola) terminating patios . reducing horizontal scale of "bridge" portions . eccentric touches . variation of sign types and mounting positions * . variation in storefront and fascia design (fewer flattened arches, less ledgestone, variation in canopy type and height, etc.) * . refined massing for office building (smaller tower at end of step-down mass) . higher ground floor canopy on office building (proper vertical proportion) . higher level of top parapet detail on office building * * recommended refinement not shown on City Alternate elevations Much of the continuity that was apparently sought through the repeated design elements can be gained through the use of trellises and other landscape structures that lead the visitor through the project. Those elements, not shown on these elevations, need not achieve a large-scale expression of variety. . Shops C, D, and H: City Alternate (above); as submitted (below). Further revision of storefronts beyond illustration is recommended. Office Building B's revisions (left) allow expression of the near- symmetry of the submittal (below left) through the lower fascia portion and smaller tower at left. The lower floor's glazing is higher, allowing for better vertical proportions. 2. Walgreen's Building . Phone 818.762.6782 RC@RogetCantrell.com . . . . . Temecula Creek Shopping Center Preliminary Review February 10, 2005 Page 5 of 5 An obvious design dilemma involves the siting of Walgreen's where it is potentially exposed to 3600 view. The elevations treat the building as if it would not have a loading dock or service area. If these functional parts of the building are to be included, they must be shown in the elevations and either architecturally treated or screened as appropriate to view. There is great variety among Walgreen's stores, but their preferred corporate model for new buildings features only one comer as a visual and entry feature. The adjacent two side elevations are given a minimal level of interest through the use of an arcade along a blank wall below clerestory windows. That model works better in a setting where the side and rear abut other stores or visual edges than in a more exposed setting as at Temecula Creek. Showcase windows would give the building a more inviting appearance. These would be viewed from the street, but the distance from the street is such that the displays in the windows would not be easily read from offsite. Therefore, showcase windows would seem to be an asset to the building, without the concern of dominant displays potentially degrading the building's appearance. Signs should be prohibited in any showcase windows. 3. Other Buildings: Aside from the issues already described for Walgreen's and for the pad buildings in general as illustrated for the south buildings, I have relatively minor concerns about the two other other buildings. Pad Building G's use of a prominent entry-style canopy over an exit door on the rear elevation is a misguided gesture toward making this highway-facing elevation read as a buiding front, contrary to everything else about the building and project. Bank Building F has the most awkward massing, with the fascia too tall for the scale of the small building. That is most pronounced in the fascia's extension over the drive-through lanes. That area in particular should be revised to a graceful sloped roof or flat canopy. 4. Details Careful detailing of the trim, soffits, railings, windows, and other elements will be essential to giving this project a high-quality appearance. Of particular concern is the provision of adequately detailed cornices and moldings, and avoidance of oversizing fascia boards or brackets (hinted at in drawings). Further review is needed, following submittal of a redesigned concept. Line-of-sight diagrams assuring screening of mechanical equipment are also needed. I look forward to further review of this project following resolution of its conceptual design problems and development of design details. Please contact me with any further questions or concerns. ee: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning Don Hazen, Principal Planner Phone 818.762.6782 RC@ RogerCantrel1. com