HomeMy WebLinkAbout033105 CC Special Meeting Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MARCH 31, 2005 -11 :00 A.M.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2005-05
Resolution: No. 2005-29
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Jeff Comerchero
Flag Salute:
Councilman Washington
ROLL CALL:
Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
1 Redhawk Annexation - Initiation of Proceedinas to Detach and Re-annex for the Purpose
of Chanaina the Effective Date of the Redhawk Annexation from July 1, 2005 to June 30,
2005
. RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\Agenda\033105
1
RESOLUTION NO. OS-_
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE
CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS FROM THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT AND CONCURRENT ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT (REDHAWK AREA)
1.2 Authorize the City Manager to take all other actions necessary and to execute such
other documents as may be necessary to effectuate the requested reorganization
through LAFCO.
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, April 12, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda\033105
2
ITEM 1
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE ~
CITY MANAGER _~
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager
DATE:
March 31, 2005
SUBJECT: Redhawk Annexation - Initiation of Proceedings to Detach and Reannex for the
Purpose of Changing the Effective Date of the Redhawk Annexation from July 1, 2005 to June 30,
2005
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council take the following actions:
1. That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 05-_
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND CONCURRENT
ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (REDHAWK
AREA)
2. Authorize the City Manager to take all other actions necessary and to execute such other
documents as may be necessary to effectuate the requested reorganization though LAFCO
BACKGROUND: The Redhawk Area will be annexed to the City of Temecula whether or not
the proposed action is approved by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission. The
proposed action would simply move up the effective date of the annexation one day from July 1, 2005
to June 30, 2005.
By moving the effective date by one day the City will retain approximately $512,000.00 per year in
revenue which it had been projected to receive as part of the fiscal. analysis of the Redhawk
Annexation.
R/Agenda ReportsfTem RedhawkAnnexation (2) 033105
Under the complex Budget Act of 2004 and the "vehicle license fee swap" legislation, the calculation
of the City's revenue changes radically if the annexation is effective in fiscal year 2004-5 as opposed
to fiscal year 2005-6.
According to LAFCO staff, this is the only method to accomplish the change in the effective date of
the Redhawk Annexation.
DISCUSSION
On November 20, 2003, the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO")
approved the annexation of the Redhawk Area to the City of Temecula by Resolution No. 53-03
("Redhawk Annexation"). A Certificate of Completion for the Redhawk Annexation was filed by
LAFCO on January 23, 2004 and the Redhawk Annexation will be effective on July 1, 2005.
Approval of the Redhawk Annexation on November 20, 2003 was preceded by the preparation of
extensive financial studies of the revenues and expenditures necessary to provide the high level of
municipal service to the Redhawk Annexation Area as are provided to the other areas of the City of
Temecula.
On March 2, 2004, the voters in the Redhawk Area overwhelmingly approved the Redhawk
Annexation with 93.86 % voting in favor. The voters also overwhelmingly approved the City parcel
tax to be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs,
median landscaping, and arterial streetlights and traffic signals with 93.12 % voting in favor. The
voters also overwhelmingly approved the Temecula Community Services District's rates and charges
to be levied against parcels in the Redhawk Area for residential street lighting and slope maintenance
with 92.62% voting in favor.
With the voters' approval of the Redhawk Annexation and the voters' approval of the two tax
measures, the Redhawk Annexation was projected to generate sufficient revenues to pay for the
municipal services required for this area as projected in the fiscal analysis prepared for the
annexation proceedings before LAFCO.
Following the completion of the Redhawk Annexation and the two revenue measures, the Legislature
enacted Chapter 211 of the Statutes of 2004 and Chapter 610 of the Statutes of 2004 amending
Revenue and Taxation Code Section 97.70 which radically altered the in-lieu vehicle license fee
adjustments and the complex formulas for distributing in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues to cities.
The legislation specifies that assessed value of an area during its first year of annexation is to be
ignored for purposes of calculating growth in the city's property tax in-lieu vehicle license fee
distribution. The effect of this is to substantially reduce the added revenues that would come with an
annexation depending on the extent of build-out of the area upon annexation. The more fully built out
the area prior to annexation, the greater the revenue loss to the annexing city. This provision is
inconsistent with the statutory plan for the equitable distribution of in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues
to cities based on assessed valuations and improperly deprives cities of the revenues necessary to
fulfill its obligations to provide municipal services to areas annexed to the city.
This legislation reduces the in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues to the City of T emecula projected as
part of the fiscal analysis of the Redhawk Annexation by $512,000.00 for the first year of the
Redhawk Annexation and by a similar amount each year there after.
The proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District of the Redhawk Area would enable the City to retain the full amount of in-lieu vehicle
license fees and fulfill the voters' intent that the Redhawk Annexation proceed on the basis of the
R/Agenda ReportsfTem Redhawk Annexalion (2) 033105 2
providing municipal services to the Redhawk Area upon a sound fiscal basis. The proposed actions
enable the City of Temecula to retain revenue to which it is entitled as part of the Redhawk
Annexation.
The proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of T emecula and the T emecula Community
Services District of the Redhawk Area does nothing more than change the effective date of the
Redhawk Annexation from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005 and thus avoids the inequitable and
unintended harsh consequences of the legislation amending Section 97.70.
The proposed action will have no fiscal impact on the County of Riverside nor on any other city in
Riverside County because the additional $512,000.00 in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues which
would come to the City of Temecula would be from State revenues under the 2004 Budget Act
"vehicle license fee swap."
If the proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District of the Redhawk Area is not approved so as to make the effective date of the
Redhawk Annexation June 30, 2005, the Redhawk Annexation will be effective on July 1, 2005, but
the City will lose the projected $512,000.00 per year necessary to make the Redhawk Annexation
financially viable.
As part of the approval of the Redhawk Annexation in 2003, the City approved a Negative
Declaration pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
None of the factual situations described in Sections 15162, 15163 and 15164 of CEQA Guidelines
(Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations) exist. These sections set forth various factual
situations which would require preparation of subsequent environmental review documents.
Therefore, the proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula
Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of T emecula and the T emecula
Community Services District of the Redhawk Area is exempt from further environmental review.
Quite simply, under the proposed action, the only change from the existing Redhawk Annexation is
that the effective day will be moved up one day from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005. The effect of this
change in the effective date affects City revenues but has no effect on the environment. All of the
environmental effects of the Redhawk Annexation were analyzed in accordance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act as part of the approval of the Redhawk
Annexation in 2003 and there have been no changes in the project or the environment which would
warrant further environmental review. Therefore, the environmental review for the proposed
concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District
and concurrent annexations to the City of T emecula and the T emecula Community Services District
of the Redhawk Area is exempt from further environmental review and complies with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
FISCAL IMPACT: If the Reorganization is approved, the City will retain $512,000 per year in in-lieu
vehicle license fee revenues as a result of the Redhawk Annexation. If the Reorganization is not
approved or not completed, the City will lose $512,000 per year in in-lieu vehicle license fee revenue
as a result of the Redhawk Annexation.
ATTACHMENT: Resolution Initiation LAFCO Proceedings
R/Agenda Reports/Tem RedhawkAnnexation (2) 033105 3
RESOLUTION NO. OS-_
A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE LOCAL
AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE
PROCEEDINGS FOR THE REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE
CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS FROM THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT AND CONCURRENT ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT (REDHAWK AREA)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
a. The City of Temecula desires to initiate a proposal pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-
Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of
the California Government Code, for the concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area.
b. Notice of the Intent to adopt this resolution of application has not been given to
the Commission and each interested party and subject agency at least 20 days prior to the
adoption of this Resolution.
c. The territory proposed to be concurrently detached from the City of T emecula
and the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexed to the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District is inhabited, and a description of the boundaries
of the territory is set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein
("Redhawk Area").
d. This proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence of the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District.
e. The Council desires to provide that the proposed concurrent detachments from
the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent
annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District of the
Redhawk Area be effective as of June 30, 2005.
f. The reasons for the proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of
Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area are as follows:
(1) On November 20, 2003, the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
Commission ("LAFCO") approved the annexation of the Redhawk Area to the City of Temecula
by Resolution No. 53-03 ("Redhawk Annexation"). A Certificate of Completion for the Redhawk
Annexation was filed by LAFCO on April 6, 2004 and the Redhawk Annexation will be effective
on July 1, 2005.
R:/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
(2) Approval of the Redhawk Annexation on November 20, 2003 was
preceded by the preparation of extensive financial studies of the revenues and expenditures
necessary to provide the high level of municipal service to the Redhawk Annexation Area as are
provided to the other areas of the City of Temecula.
(3) On March 2, 2004, the voters in the Redhawk Area overwhelmingly
approved the Redhawk Annexation with 93.86% voting in favor. The voters also overwhelmingly
approved the City parcel tax to be used for parks, recreational facilities, recreational and
community services programs, median landscaping, and arterial streetlights and traffic signals
with 93.12% voting in favor. The voters also overwhelmingly approved the Temecula Community
Services District's rates and charges to be levied against. parcels in the Redhawk Area for
residential street lighting and slope maintenance with 92.62% voting in favor.
(4) With the voters' approval of the Redhawk Annexation and the voters'
approval of the two tax measures, the Redhawk Annexation was projected to generate sufficient
revenues to pay for the municipal services required for this area as projected in the fiscal
analysis prepared for the annexation proceedings before LAFCO.
(5) Following the completion of the Redhawk Annexation and the two
revenue measures, the Legislature enacted Chapter 211 of the Statutes of 2004 and Chapter
610 of the Statutes of 2004 amending Revenue and Taxation Code Section 97.70 which radically
altered the in-lieu vehicle license fee adjustments and the complex formulas for distributing in-
lieu vehicle license fee revenues to cities. The legislation specifies that assessed value of an
area during its first year of annexation is to be ignored for purposes of calculating growth in the
city's property tax in-lieu vehicle license fee distribution. The effect of this is to substantially
reduce the added revenues that would come with an annexation depending on the extent of
build-out of the area upon annexation. The more fully built out the area prior to annexation, the
greater the revenue loss to the annexing city. This provision is inconsistent with the statutory
plan for the equitable distribution of in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues to cities based on
assessed valuations and improperly deprives cities of the revenues necessary to fulfill its
obligations to provide municipal services to areas annexed to the city.
(6) This legislation reduces the in-lieu vehicle license fee revenues to the City
of Temecula projected as part of the fiscal analysis of the Redhawk Annexation by $512,000.00
for the first year of the Redhawk Annexation and by a similar amount each year there after.
(7) The proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the
Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area would enable the City to retain
the full amount of vehicle license fees to fulfill the voters' intent that the Redhawk Annexation
proceed on the basis of the providing municipal services to the Redhawk Area upon a sound
fiscal basis. The proposed actions enable the City of Temecula to retain revenue to which it is
entitled as part of the Redhawk Annexation.
(8) The proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the
Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area does nothing more than change
the effective date of the Redhawk Annexation from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005 and thus
avoids the inequitable and unintended harsh consequences of the legislation amending Section
97.70.
R/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
2
(9) The proposed action will have no fiscal impact on the County of
Riverside nor on any other city in Riverside County because the additional $512,000.00 in-lieu
vehicle license fee revenues which would come to the City of TemecuJa would be from State
revenues under the 2004 Budget Act "vehicle license fee swap."
(10) If the proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area is not approved so as to
make the effective date of the Redhawk Annexation June 30, 2005, the Redhawk Annexation will
be effective on July 1, 2005, but the City will lose the projected $512,000.00 per year necessary
to make the Redhawk Annexation financially viable.
g. As part of the approval of the Redhawk Annexation in 2003, the City approved a
Negative Declaration pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
None of the factual situations described in Sections 15162, 15163 and 15164 of the CEQA
Guidelines (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations) exist. These sections required
subsequent environmental review in specified factual situations. Therefore, the proposed
concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and the TemecuJa Community Services
District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
Services District of the Redhawk Area are exempt from further environmental review. Quite
simply, under the proposed action, the only change from the existing Redhawk Annexation is
that the effective day will be moved up one day from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005. The effect
of this change in the effective date affects City revenues but has no effect on the environment.
All of the environmental effects of the Redhawk Annexation were analyzed in accordance with
the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act as part of the approval of the
Redhawk Annexation in 2003 and there have been no changes in the project or the environment
which would warrant further environmental review. Therefore, the City Council certifies that the
environmental review for the proposed concurrent detachments from the City of Temecula and
the Temecula Community Services District and concurrent annexations to the City of Temecula
and the Temecula Community Services District of the Redhawk Area is exempt from further
environmental review and complies with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act. The Planning Director is authorized and directed to file a Notice of Exemption as
provided by law.
h. As described above, the voters in the Redhawk Area overwhelmingly approved
the Redhawk Annexation, the City parcel tax, and the TCSD rates and charges. The proposed
detachment and annexation only changes the effective date of the Redhawk Annexation and
does not modify in any way the revenue measures approved by the voters.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby requests the Local
Agency Formation Commission to take all proceedings necessary for the concurrent
detachments from the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District and
concurrent annexations to the City ofTemecula and the Temecula Community Services District
of the Redhawk Area, as described in Exhibit 1, according to the terms and conditions stated
above and in the manner provided by the Cortese-Know-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000.
R:/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
3
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 31st day of March, 2005.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 05-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 31st day of March, 2005, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
5
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF REDHAWK ANNEXATION AREA
R/Resos 2005/Resos 05-_
6
.
.
HI\lEJ(~~II).E Lf\FC;()
January 23, 2004
State Board of Equalization
Tax Area Services Section
Post Office Box 942879
Sacramento, California 94279-0059
SUBJECT:
LAFCO 2003-26-3-Reorganization of 'l'erritory to Include
Concurrent Annexations to the City of 'l'emecula and the
'l'emecula Community Services District, and Concurrent
Detachments from County Service Areas 143, 152 and the
Riverside County Waste Resources Management District.
Pursuant . to California law, you will find enclosed the following
documents relating to the above-referenced action:
1. Statement of Boundary Change.
2. Certificate of Completion
3. LAFCO Resolution No. C-01-04
4. Map and legal description
5. Warrant to cover the fee.
Property tax transfer negotiations have been completed as required by
the Revenue and Taxation Code, and resolutions of affected agencies are
on file in this office. Please file the above documents and acknowledge
receipt at your earliest convenience.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
~~~
Elena G. Medina .
LAFCO Assistant
'Enclosures
Continued----
RIVERSIDE WeAL AnRNrv HY"IR7I.".6'T'Jnl\T r"f"\'I\ '" KT............................
cc: Assessor
Auditor-Controller, Robert E. Byrd
Registrar of Voters
Sheriff's Department, Captain
Fire Department, Chief
Environmental Health, Deputy Director
Executive Office, Kathy Gifford
Riverside County Office of Education
CALTRANS, District 11
California Highway Patrol, Captain
Auto Club of Southern California
Southern California Edison Company,
Southern California Gas Company
E911-MSAG COORDINATION -Sheriff's Dept.
Thomas Brothers Maps, Source Department
Transportation Agency/Survey Section
Subject Agencies
Applicant
LAFCO File
RIVERSIDE WCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION. 3850 VINE STREIT, SUITE 110 . RIVERSIDE, CA 92507-4225
Statement of Boundary Change
State Board of Equalization
Tax Area Services Section
450 N Street, MIC: 59
P. O. BOX 942879
Sacramento, Califomia 94279-0059
B.O.E File No:
County: RIVERSIDE I County #: 33 I Acreal!e; ],344 I Fee:$3,500 Reso]ution/Ord.No
Conductim Authoritv: Riverside Local Al!encv Formation Commission LAFCO Res. No.: 40-03
Short Title LAFCO 2003-26-3 Effective Date: ] 2-03-03
Type of Action:
City/Districl{s)
Affected by
Action
Affected Territory
is legally:
The affected
territory;
Enclosed are the
following items
required at the time
offiling:
City Boundary
Changes Only:
kJ] Annexation to District 106 Consolidation oflRA's 10 Formation Redevelovment
Kl2 Annexation to City 107 Detachment from District 11 Name Chan"e
04 City Incorporation 108 Disso]ution of District X 12 ReofP"anization
5 Consolidation of District 109 Formation-District 13 Schoo] District Chan"e
BOE
Code# District Tvne of Chanae
Citvof Temecu]a Annexation
Temecula Community Services District Annexation
County Service Area 143 Detachment
Countv Service Area 152 Detachment
. Riverside Co. Waste Resources Manae:ement District Detachment
~eveloped
ndeveloped
nhabited
ninhabited
Number of Areas:
twill be taxed for existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations as set forth by the terms and
Conditions as stated in the resolution.
X twill not be'taxed for existinv bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations.
X ees
X e al Descri tion
X eso]ution of Conductin Authorit
X Certificate of Co letion
X
X
X
X
X
street numbers
Board of Equalization will acknowledge receipt affiling to:
B.O.E. use only
chk#:
Name: GEORGE SPILIOTIS
Title: EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Agency: RIVERSIDE LAFCO
amt
Street: 3850 Vine Street, Ste. 110
City and Zip Code: RIVERSIDE CA 92507-4225
),
369-063 ]
Janua 23,2004
Date"
Mar 29 05 02:37p
Riverside LAFCO
(9091369-8479
p.B
..
DOC " 2004-0246124
f)4106120B4
Conformed Copy
Has not be~n eomp.red with orIginal
IeI\fE}{SIIllt rl~qF(~(}
Gary L Orso
County of Riverside
Assessor, CO~nty Clerk & Recorder
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION
STOP #1030
Pursuant to the Cortese.Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Sections 57200 et seq. this Certificate is
hereby issued by the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County, California.
1 . Short-form designation, as designated by LAFCO is 2003-26-3.
2. The name of the city/districts involved in this reorganization and the kind or type of change ordered for the annexation is as
follows:
Cilv & District
Tvpe of Chance of Oroanizatlon
City of Temecula
Temecula Community Services District
County Service Area 143
County Service Area 152
Riverside County Waste Resources Mgt. Dis!.
Annexation
Annexation
Detachment
Detachment
Detachment
3. The above-listed district is located within the following county: Riverside.
4. A description of the boundaries of the above-cited change of reorganization is shown on the attached map and legal
description, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference incorporated herein,
5. The territory is inhabited.
6. This reorganization has been approved subject to the terms and conditions outiined as follows:
a. Prior to recordation of the Certificate of Completion, all applicable taxes, assessments and charges for services to
be provided by the T emecula Community Services District shall be approved in accordance with the requirements of
Proposition 218.
b. The City of Temecula shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCO), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against lAFCO, its
agents, officers, and employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of LAFCO concerning this proposal.
c. Establish the effective date of the reorganization as July 1, 2005.
7. Resolution No. C-01-04 ordering this'reorganization was adopted on January 14, 2004. A Certified copy of the Resolution
is atlached hereto and by reference incorporated herein.
I hereby certity that as Executive Officer for the Local Agency Formation Commission of Riverside County, the above~isted agency
has completed change r a 'zation pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.
Date: April 6, 2004
RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FDRMATION COMMISSION. 3650 VINE SIREET, SUITE 110 . RNERSIDE. CA 92507-4277
Phone (909) 369-0631 . www.lafco.org. Fax 19091 369.8479
."
1
Local Agency Formation Commission
County of Riverside
2
3 RESOLUTION NO. C-01-04
4 ORDERING REORGANIZATION OF TERRITORY TO INCLUDE CONCURRENT
5 ANNEXATIONS TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY
6 SERVICES DISTRICT, AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS FROM COUNTY
7 SERVICE AREAS 143, 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES
8 MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
9 LAFCO NO. 2003-26-3
10
WHEREAS, proceedings have been initiated pursuant to
11 the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act
12 of 2000, commencing with Section 56000 of the California
13 Government Code, for reorganization of 1,344 acres of land
14 located south of Highway 79, east of pechanga Parkway/Pala
15 Road,
west of Anza Road and north of
Pechanga Indian
16 Reservation as more particularly described in Exhibit "Au,
17 attached hereto and made a part hereof, and
18
WHEREAS, the short form designation of the proposal
19 is LAFCO No. 2003-26-3-Reorganization to Include Concurrent
20 Annexations to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community
21
Services District,
and Concurrent Detachments from County
22 Service Areas 143, 152 and the Riverside County Waste Resources
23 Management District, and
24
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of
25 the County of Riverside adopted Resolution No. 53-03 on
RIVUSIDIt
weAL J\.GSNCT
tA'l':ION COIOUSS:IOH
ISO Vine St".et
Suite 110
"side., California
92501-.225
"ng) ]69-0&11
26
27
28
November 20, 2003, approving the Reorganization, and
WHEREAS, by LAFCO Resolution No. 44-01, the
Commission has delegated authority over all conducting
- 1 -
..
1 authority functions to the Executive Officer; and
2 WHEREAS, Resolution 53-03 directed the Executive
3 Officer to commence protest proceedings pursuant to Part 4 of
4 the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act
5 of 2000, commencing with Section 57000; and
6
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
7 Formation Commission acting on behalf of the Commission as the
8 conducting authority, held a properly noticed public hearing on
9 this matter on Thursday, January 8, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. at 3850
10 Vine Street, Suite 110, Riverside, California, and
11
WHEREAS, the Executive Officer has found that the
12 value of the written protests filed and not withdrawn was less
13 than 25 percent of the registered voters within the affected
14 area and less than 25 percent of the number of owners of land
15 owning 25 percent of the assessed value of land within the
16 affected territory in accordance with Government Code Section
17 57075 (a) .
18
WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the proposal as
19 approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission are as
20 follows:
21
a.
Prior to recordation of the Certificate of
22 Completion, all applicable taxes, assessments and charges for
23 services to be provided by the Temecula Community Services
24 District shall be approved in accordance with the requirements
25 of Proposition 218.
26 b. The City of Temecula shall defend, indemnify and
27 hold harmless the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
llIVE:RSrIlli:
oc,,~ "GlBNCY
rlOll COMll:J:$SJ:OH .
l) Vine Str..t
Suit.. 110
ide, CaU.fornia
US07.U25
U13U_06U ')
28 Commission (LAFCO), its agents, officers, and employees from
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
:RIV2RSIPIl
LOCAL AGENCY
lRKA't'IOIf COlollUSSJ:ON
3150 Vine Stre.t
Suite 110
"."side, Califgrnia
92507.4225
(tau 3U-O'Jl
any claim, action, or proceeding against LAFCO, its agents,
officers, and employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of LAFCO concerning this proposal.
c.
Establish
the
the
effective
date
of
reorganization as July 1, 2005.
WHEREAS, the reason for this proposed annexation is
to provide municipal services by the City of Temecula, and
WHEREAS,
the regular County assessment roll
is
utilized by the subject agencies; and
WHEREAS,
the Commission determined the territory
proposed to be reorganized is legally inhabited as defined in
Government Code Section 56046; and
WHEREAS, the affected. territory will not be taxed
for existing general bonded indebtedness of this City; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Executive
Officer, on behalf of the Local Agency Formation Commission,
pursuant
the
Government
to
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg
Local
Reorganization Act of 2000, orders the reorganization of the
territory described in Exhibit "AU to include Annexations to
the City of Temecula, and the Temecula Community Services
District, and Concurrent Detachments from County Service Areas
142, 152 and the Riverside County Waste Resources Management
District.
1111111111
1111111111
IIIIIIIIII
1111111111
IIIIIIIIII
- 3 -
.
.,
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RIVIlRSIDE
LOCAL AGII:NCY
)RMATIOI COMKISSrON
]850 Vin.. Street
S"itell0
verside, California
92S~1 _4225
(909) JU-063L
1
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Officer
2 shall complete this proposal pursuant to State Law subject to
3 terms and conditions as approved by the Commission.
4
ADOPTED, this 14th day of January 2004.
I'
1
Acknowledged:
dLA-J.J/7>...../
ERSON, CHAIR
FORM APPROVED
COUNTY COUNSE"t
JAN 1 5 2004
BY ~~~.~
ASSISTANT COUNTY COUNSEL
- 4 -
LAFCO 2003-26-3
. EXHIBIT "A"
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDHA WK
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
That certain parcel of land situated in the unincorporated territory of the County of Riverside,
State of California, described as follows:
COMMENCING at an angle point on the existing City of Temecula boundary as
. described in adocument recorded December 9, 1994 as Instrument No. 461244,
Official Records of said County hereinafter referred to as LAFCO No. 88-70-1,
said point being the intersection of the southeasterly right-of-way of State
Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide) and the centerline of Butterfield Stage Road (100
feet wide) as shown by Tract No. 23172, on file in Book 251 of Maps at Pages 94
through 99 inclusive, records of said County;
Thence hereafter along said City of Temecula boundary and the centerline of said
Butterfield Stage Road, South 22057'33" East, a distance of 1,016.04 feet
(recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as North 22056'22" West, a distance of
1,016.04 feet) also being the northwest comer of Parcel Map 24387 as shown by
map on file in Book 164 of Parcel Maps at Pages 5 through 20 thereof, records of
Riverside County and the beginning of a non-tangent curve, concave southerly
and having a radius of 3,000.00 feet, a radial line to said beginning bears North
9046'23" West, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
Thence easterly along said curve and northerly boundary of said Parcel Map
24387, through a central angle of 1024'19", an arc distance of 73.58 feet
(recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as a central angle of 1024'38", and an arc
distance of73.86 feet);
Thence continuing along the northerly line of said Parcel Map 24387 North
81037'56" East, a distance of 738.45 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as
South 81039'22" West, a distance of 737.32 fe~t);
Thence leaving said City of Temecula boundary and continuing along the
northerly boundary of Parcel Map 24387 North 81037'56" East, a distance of
1,758.87 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northwesterly and
having a radius of 4,200.00 feet;
Thence continuing along the northerly boundary of said Parcel Map 24387,
. northeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of 10054'38", an arc
distance of 799.79 feet;
Page I of 14
".
--
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the northerly boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North
70043'18" East, a distance of3,539.21 feet to the centerline of Anza Road and the
beginning of a non-tangent curve concave northeasterly and having a radius of
1,200.00 feel, a radial line to said beginning bears South 82035'43" West;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, southeasterly
along said curve, also being the centerline of Anza Road, through a central angle
of 16029'04", an arc distance of345.25 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387, also being the
centerline of Anza Road, South 23053'21" East, a distance of 140.16 feet to the
most easterly comer of Parcel 18 as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence leaving the centerline of Anza Road, along the southerly line of said
Parcel 18 South 71011'03" West, a distance of 3,092.94 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
11007'17" East, a distance of 1,273.78 feet to the most easterly comer of Parcel
14 as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along the southeasterly boundary of said Parcel 14 South 71058'24"
West, a distance of 1,051.49 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
50032'59" West, a distance of582.84 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
39052'38" Wesl, a distance of2,189.7Ifeet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
29037'22" East, a distance of 1,305.54 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
73010'23" West, a distance of 449.26 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
43057'13" West, a distance of 773.17 feet to the intersection of the southwesterly
line ofPauba Rancho as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along said Pauba Rancho line and the boundary of said Parcel Map
24387 North 46046'24" West, a distance of210.00 feet to the intersection of the
southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho as shown by said Parcel Map24387;
Thence along said southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho and the boundary of
said Parcel Map 24387 South 53006'24" West, a distance of68.13 feet;
Page 2 of14
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 0053'12"
West, a distance of I, I 43 .59 feet to the southeast comer of Parcel II as shown by
said Parcel Map 24387, said southeast comer also being the intersection of the
centerline of Wool pert Lane and the southerly line of said of Parcel II;
Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel II North 88020'45" West, a
distance of 1,450.44 feet to the intersection of the southerly line of Little
Temecula Rancho as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along said southerly line of Little Temecula Rancho and the boundary of
said Parcel Map 24387 South 53006'24" West, a distance of 1,510.57 feet;
Thence leaving said Little Temecula Rancho line and continuing along the
boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 0014'33" East, a distance of 1,684.12
feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South
88"21'31" East, a distance of 393.97 feet to a point on the centerline of Anza
Road;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 and said
centerline of Anza Road South 88021'31" East, a distance of 530.73 feet;
Thence leaving the centerline of said Anza Road and continuing along the
boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 88021'31" East, a distance of 372.65
feet to the northeast comer of Parcel 24 as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 24 South 1013'00" East, a distance
of 1,278.36 feet to the southeast comer thereof;
Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 24 North 89035'41" West, a
distance of 1,3 15.76 feet;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 South 0020'15"
East, a distance of 1,306.96 feet to the southeast comer of Parcel 23 as shown by
said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along the southerly line of said Parcel 23 North 89024'49" West, a
distance of 1,319.25 feet to the most northeast comer of Parcel 25 as shown by
said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence along the easterly line of said Parcel 25 of said Parcel Map 24387 South
0039'20" West, a distance of 1,335.55 feet to the southeast comer thereof;
Thence along the most southerly line of said Parcel 25 and the westerly
prolongation thereof North 89048'50" West, a distance of 1,993.66 feet to a
comer of said Parcel Map 24387;
Page 3 of 14
~~;f
\ g,~ ".""
'.~~ < 'i! ~
I ()f;~ IJ:j
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence leaving the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 and continuing North
89048'50" West, a distance of 41.16 feet to the intersection of the centerline of
Pala Road;
Thence along the centerline of said Pala Road as shown by said Parcel Map
24387 North 43001'34" West, a distance of 520.55 feet;
Thence continuing along the centerline of Pala Road as shown by said Parcel
Map 24387 North 44049'36" West, a distance 372.50 feet to a point on the
centerline of Deer Hollow Way, said point also described by document referred
to herein as LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the southwesterly end of Course No. 82;
Hereafter, the following courses are described to follow the boundary of the City
of Temecula as described by said document referred to herein as LAFCO No. 88-
70-1:
Thence along the centerline of Deer Hollow Way also being the
boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North 42023'18" East, a distance of
2,254.53 feet (recorded in LAFCO No, 88-70-1 as South 42023'59"
West, a distance of 2,254.57 feet) to the most southerly comer of Parcel
27 as shown by said Parcel Map 24387;
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North
24050'41" West, a distance of 832.36 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 24049'53" East, a distance of 832.36 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North
30048'15" West, a distance of 1,705.39 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 30047'27" East, a distance of 1,705.39 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Parcel Map 24387 North
61002'24" West, a distance of 448.25 feet to the most westerly comer of
said Parcel Map 24387, said comer also being the most southerly comer
of Tract No. 23063-5 as shown by map on file in Book 221 of Maps at
pages 21 through 29, records of said Riverside County;
Thence continuing North 61002'24" West along the boundary line of said
Tract No. 23063-5, a distance of 169.00 feet (the sum of the previous 2
courses was recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 61001'36" East, a
distance of 617 .25 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary line of said Tract No. 23063-5
North 45033'18" West, a distance of 711.38 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 88-70-1 as South 45032'22" East, a distance of7I1.56 feet);
Page 4 of 14
I~
\~~ ~(1\
~~~~ll t'w, )
-::,~,jI;- Th I
,-'
f{ - -(/j
,
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the boundary line of said Tract No. 23063-5
North 45048'11" East, a distance of 415.51 feet to the southwesterly
boundary line of Tract No. 23063-4 as shown by map on file in Book
221 of Maps at Pages 12 through 20 thereof, records of said Riverside
County (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 45048'16" West, a
distance of 415.45 feet);
Thence North 41021'23" West along the boundary of said Tract No.
23063-4, a distance of 442.13 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as
South 41019'56" East, a distance of 442.14 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-4 South
45058'28" West, a distance of 416.34 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 45058'31" East, a distance of 416.34 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-4 North
35027'12" West, a distance of 710.25 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 35026'16" East, a distance of 709.90 feet) to a point on the
centerline of W olf Valley Road, said point also being the most southerly
comer of Tract 23063-3 on file in Book 220 of Maps at Pages 40 through
56 thereof, records of said Riverside County;
Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North 35027'12"
West, a distance of 88.47 feet (this course was not described in LAFCO
No. 88-70-1);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
53034'28" West, a distance of 726.59 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 53033'32" East, a distance of 726.59 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
65016'26" West, a distance of 955.73 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 65015'30" East, a distance of 634.63 feet and South
65015'30" East, a distance of321.10feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
4018'10 East, a distance of 173.65 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1
as South 4018'36" West, a distance of 173.52 feet) to the beginning ofa
non-tangent curve, concave northerly, and having a radius of 1,200.00
feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as 1,200.00 feet), a radial line to
said beginning bears South 4018'10" West;
Thence easterly continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3
and said curve through a central angle of 7058'45", an arc distance of
167.12 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as westerly along the arc
of said curve through a central angle of 7057'33", a distance of 166.70
feet);
Page 5 of 14
".
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
86019'25" East, a distance of 119.99 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 86020'45" West, a distance of 120.05 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
37024'25" East, a distance of 300.1 5 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 37027'00" West, a distance of300.09 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-3 North
40004'56" West, a distance of 28.05 feet to the comer of Tract No.
23063-2 as shown by map on file in Book 220 of Maps at Pages 30
through 39 thereof, records of said Riverside County;
Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North 40004'56"
West, a distance of 411.25 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the
sum of the previous 2 courses being South 40003'40" East, a distance of
439.27 feet);
,
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North
21013'17" East, a distance of 171.28 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 21017'35" West, a distance of 171.27 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North
20023'03" East, a distance of 286.33 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 20022'30" West, a distance of 286.32 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North
61043'07" East, a distance of 216.05 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 61044'20" West, a distance of216.03 feet)
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North
81033'01" East, a distance of 315.81 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 81033'05" West, a distance of315.83 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 South
84039'28" East, a distance of 208.85 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 84037'55" West, a distance of208.85 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 South
48039'10" East, a distance of 247.87 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 48037'40" West, a distance of247.90 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 South
69039'18" East, a distance of 336.15 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 69038'35" West, a distance of336.25 feet);
Page 6 ofl4
,........"'...,~
/. '" "-
l ,;~7~ m.&? \
\~t'!J! !iii\l:" }
-"(y
II- 0 -r/}
EXHIBIT "Au
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 North
70044'12" East, a distance of 452.93 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 70045'05" West, a distance of 452.95 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 South
67057'32" East, a distance of 532.15 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 67056'54" West, a distance of532.09 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No 23063-2 South
63029'28" East, a distance of 282.47 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 63029'11" West, a distance of 282.48 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-2 and the
easterly prolongation thereof North 83015'57" East, a distance of 724.10
feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as South 83016'35" West, a
distance of 724.11 feet) to the comer of Tract No. 23063-6 as shown by
map on file in Book 222 of Maps at Pages 84 through 98 thereof, records
of said Riverside County;
Thence along the boundary of said Tract No. 23063-6 North 16040'07"
West, a distance of 885.05 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as
South 16038'12" East, a distance of885.01 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 South
56041'35" West, a distance of 654.72 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 56042'21" East, a distance of 654.77 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 North
74059'09" West, a distance of 578.70 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 74058'19" East, a distance of 578.70 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-6 North
53008'15" West, a distance of 36.74 feet to the most southerly comer of
Tract No. 23063-1 as shown by map on file in Book 212 of Maps at
Pages 49 through 58 thereof, records of said Riverside County;
Thence along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North 53008'15" West,
a distance of 110.10 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-1 as the sum of
the preceding 2 courses, South 53007'41" East, a distance ofl46.84 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North
80054'34" West, a distance of 250.04 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 80053'58" East, a distance of250.08 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 South
88020'52" West, a distance of 193.02 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 88021'44" East, a distance of 192.98 feet);
Page 7 of!4
;;;;:,,~'"
~".".'.'I'.b'"
!;;~;2)~;;"@' 1
:~~ti : ~ U1
-.
I ( ]0 ,I/?
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North
70001'39" West, a distance of 199.56 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 70001'17" East, a distance of 199.56 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North
86059'58" West, a distance of 141.49 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 86059'50" East, a distance of 141.46 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of said Tract 23063-1 North
0031'07" West, a distance of 305.00 feet to the southerly comer of Parcel
I of Parcel Map 24332 as shown by map on file in Book 156 of Parcel
Maps at Pages 98 through 103 thereof, records of said Riverside County;
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
0031'07" West, a distance of263.08 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-
I as the sum of the preceding 2 course, South 0030'33" East, a distance of
568.12 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
21016'25" West, a distance of 858.96 feet (recorded in LAFCO 88-70-1
as South 21015'55" East, a distance of 859.04 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I South
88017'35" East, a distance of 523.72 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as North 88017'14" West, a distance of 523.70 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
63050'16" East, a distance of 285.06 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 63051'00" West, a distance of285.07 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
46030'39" West, a distance of 215.14 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-
70-1 as South 46030'00" East, a distance of215.19 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
4004'38" West, a distance of 148.52 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 88-70-
I as South 4003'15" East, a distance of 148.41 feet);
Thence continuing along the westerly line of said Parcel I North
50001 '58" East, a distance of 360.94 feet to a non-tangent curve, concave
northeasterly and having a radius of 1,200.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 88-70-1 as having a radius of 1,200.00 feet), a radial line to said
beginning bears South 40025'23 " West, said curve also being the
centerline of Redhawk Parkway (recorded in LAFCO No. . 88-70-1 as
South 50002'41" West, a distance of361.13 feet);
Page 8 ofl4
~ m~1 ft~
\~...., ""Of
"-<';;I< .;,
11_ .1)3
EXHIBIT "Au
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence northwesterly along said curve also being the centerline of
Redhawk Parkway as shown by Parcel Map 27987-1 on file in Book 187
of Parcel Maps at Pages 93 through 98 thereof, records of said Riverside
County, through a central angle of 22057'41", an arc distance of 480.90
feet to the southwesterly comer of Parcel 2 as described in a document
recorded June 11,2001 as Instrument No. 2001-259872, Official Records
of said County, hereinafter referred to as LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 said
comer being on the existing City of Temecula boundary, a radial line at
said comer bears North 63023'04" East;
Hereafter, the following courses are described to follow the boundary of
the City of Temecula described by said document referred to herein as
LAFCO No. 2000-10-1:
Thence along the boundary of last mentioned Parcel 2 North 63023'04"
East, a distance of 66.83 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line
of said Redhawk Parkway (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as South
63023'04" West, a distance of66.83 feet);
Thence continuing along the boundary of last mentioned Parcel 2 North
73022'11" East, a distance of391.17 feet (recorded in LAFCO 2000-10-1
as South 73022'11" West, a distance of 180.00 feet and South 73022'11"
West, a distance of21 1.17 feet) to the southeasterly comer thereof;
Thence continuing along the boundary of last mentioned Parcel 2 North
16037'49" West, a distance of 225.00 feet to the northeasterly corner
thereof, said comer being on the southeasterly right-of-way line of State
Highway 79 (142.00 feet wide) as shown by Tract No. 23172 on file in
Book 251 of Maps at Pages 94 through 99 thereof, records of said
Riverside County and the City of Temecula boundary as described by
said LAFCO No. 88-70-1;
Thence along the southeasterly right-of-way line of said State Highway
79 and the City of Temecula boundary North 73022'11" East, a distance
of 2,028,71 feet to the northwesterly comer of Parcel 3 as described by
said LAFCO No. 2000-10-1;
Thence along the westerly boundary of last mentioned Parcel 3 South
16037'49" East, a distance of283.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as North 16037'49" West, a distance of 283.00 feet) to the
southwesterly comer thereof;
Thence along the southerly boundary of last mentioned Parcel 3 North
73022'11" East, a distance of 283.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as South 73022'11" West, a distance of 283;00 feet) to the
southeasterly comer thereof;
Page 9 of 14
/::::".')
j ~,.~-" ~ 'e;_ ,'"
l i:{J % r~ftt
\:'f~ U. .},.~, I
~
/h~{)-/J3
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence along the easterly boundary of last mentioned Parcel 3 North
16037'49" West, a distance of 283.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No.
2000-10-1 as South 16037'49" East, a distance of 283.00 feet) to the
northeasterly corner thereof, said corner being on the southeasterly right-
of-way line of said State Highway 79 and the existing City of Temecula
boundary;
Thence along the southeasterly right-of-way line of said State Highway
79 and the existing City of Temecula boundary North 73022'1 I" East, a
distance of 957.76 feet to an angle point in said City of Temecula
boundary as described in said LAFCO 2000- 10-1, said angle point also
being the northeasterly corner of Lot 19 of said Tract No. 23172;
Thence along the easterly line of said Lot 19 South 16037'49" East, a
distance of 754.15 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as North
16037'49" West, a distance of 754.15 feet) to the southeasterly corner
thereof, said corner being on the southerly line of said Tract No. 23172;
Thence along the southerly line of said Tract No. 23172 South 68058'51"
West, a distance of3,161.86 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as
North 68058'51" East, a distance of 3,161.86 feet) to an angle point
therein;
Thence continuing along the southerly line of said Tract No. 23 I 72
North 87001'26" West, a distance of 126.59 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 2000-10-1 as South 87001'26" East, a distance of 126.59 feet) to a
point on the easterly right-of-way line of said Redhawk Parkway;
Thence continuing along the southerly line of said Tract No. 23 I 72
South 33046'37" West a distance of 50.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No.
2000-10-1 as North 33046'37" East, a distance of 50.00 feet) to the
centerline of said Redhawk Parkway and the southwesterly corner of said
Tract No. 23 172;
Thence along the centerline of said Redhawk Parkway South 56013'23"
East, a distance of 1,287.57 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as
North 56013'23" West, a distance of 1,287.57 feet) to the intersection of .
Paseo Parallon and said Redhawk Parkway, said point also being the
beginning of a tangent curve concave southwesterly, having a radius of
1,200.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along said curve, also being the centerline of said
Redhawk Parkway, through a central angle of34051'26" an arc distance
of 730.05 feet (recorded in LAFCO 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,200.00
feet, through a central angle of3405I'27", an arc distance of 730,05 feet);
Page 10 of 14
/~.
. .._'..-'"'
( '~l'\_" j-'-l ^,.,
l~;hl f:,~f: I
~ ,~-"..- " }:J..\.
/1-) ~tJ3
EXHIBIT" A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Redhawk Parkway South
21021'57" East, a distance of 297.87 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as North 21021'57" West, a distance of297.87 feet) to the beginning
of a tangent curve concave northeasterly, having a radius of 630.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along said curve, also being the centerline of said
Redhawk Parkway, through a central angle of 17013'56", an arc distance
of 189.48 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of630.00
feet, through a central angle of IT13'56", an arc distance of 189.48
feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Redhawk Parkway South
38035'53" East, a distance of 160.53 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as North 38035'53" West, a distance of 160.53 feet) to the
intersection of the centerlines of said Redhawk Parkway and Vail Ranch
Parkway (100.00 feet wide), said point being the beginning of a non-
tangent curve concave southeasterly, having a radius of 1,000.00 feet, a
radial line at said intersection bears South 38035'53" East;
Thence southwesterly along said non-tangent curve, also being the
centerline of said Vail Ranch Parkway, through a central angle of
6018'25", an arc distance of 110.08 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as a radius of 1,000.00 feet, through a central angle of 6018'25", an
arc distance of 110.08 feet) to a point of cusp in said City of Temecula
boundary, a radial line to said point of cusp bears North 44054'18" West;
Thence leaving said centerline South 84001'58" East, a distance of
203.69 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as North 84001'58"
West, a distance of 203.69 feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve
concave southerly, having a radius of 1,600.00 feet;
Thence easterly along said curve, through a central angle of 17056'55",
an arc distance of 501.22 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a
radius of 1,600.00 feet, through a central angle of 17056'55", an arc
distance of501.22 feet);
Thence South 66005'03" East, a distance of 742.19 feet (recorded in
.LAFCO No, 2000-10-1 as North 66005'03" West, a distance of 742.19
feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northerly, having a
radius of 1,200.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly and easterly along said curve, through a central
angle of 40053'24", an arc distance of 856.40 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,200.00 feet, through a central angle of
40053'24", an arc distance of 856.40 feet);
Page 11 ofl4
~-..."
('H r:~q\
\"~.,.,,,.;.1
.'.....' ".;'-
11-). -P3
EXHIBIT" A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
Thence North 73001'33" East, a distance of 552.40 feet (recorded in
LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as South 73001'33" West, a distance of 552.40
feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve concave southerly, having a
radius of 1,200.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly and easterly along said curve, through a central
angle of 40053'24", an arc distance of 856.40 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,200.00 feet, through a central angle of
40053'24", an arc distance of 856.40 feet);
Thence South 66005'03" East, a distance of 545.80 feet (recorded in
LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as North 66005'03" West, a distance of 545.80
feet) to the beginning of a tangent curve concave northerly, having a
radius of 4,000.00 feet;
Thence southeasterly along said curve, through a central angle of
6016'51", an arc distance of 438.49 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as a radius of 4,000.00 feet, through a central angle of 6016'51", an
arc distance of 438.49 feet);
Thence South 72021'54" East a distance of 719.17 feet (recorded in
LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as North 72021'54" East, a distance of 719.17
feet) to an intersection with the centerline of Vail Ranch Parkway
(100.00 feet wide), said intersection being the beginning of a non-tangent
curve concave westerly, having a radius of 2,500.00 feet, a radial line at
said intersection bears North 64050'22" West;
Thence northerly along said curve, also being the centerline of said Vail
Ranch Parkway, through a central angle of 8026'51", an arc distance of
368.59 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 2,500.00
feet, through a central angle of 8026'51", an arc distance of368.59 feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Vail Ranch Parkway
North 16042'47" East, a distance of 101.80 feet (recorded in LAFCO No.
2000-10-1 as South 16042'47" West, a distance of 101.80 feet) to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave westerly, having a radius of
1,000.00 feet;
Thence northerly along said curve, also being the centerline of said Vail
Ranch Parkway, through a central angle of 35016'58", an arc distance of
615.80 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,000.00.
feet, through a central angle of35016'58", an arc distance of615.80 feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Vail Ranch Parkway
North 18034'11" West, a distance of 134.68 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 2000-10-1 as South 18034'11" East, a distance of 134.68 feet) to the
Page 12 of 14
/-~
/,"".. ':\
(ll~!}J ~.,;)
._~ .. '''~.
/1- v-fJ3
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
intersection of the centerline of said Vail Ranch Parkway and Nighthawk
Pass (88.00 feet wide);
Thence along the centerline of said Nighthawk Pass North 71025'49"
East, a distance of 130.56 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000- 10-1 as
South 71025'49" West, a distance of 130.56 feet) to the beginning of a
tangent curve concave northwesterly, having a radius of 1,000.00 feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve, also being the centerline of said
Nighthawk Pass, through a central angle of 49030'49", an arc distance of
864.18 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,000.00
feet, through a central angle of 49030'49", an arc distance of 864.18 feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Nighthawk Pass North
21055'00" East, a distance of 167.64 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as South 21055'00" West, a distance of 167.64 feet) to the beginning
of a tangent curve concave southeasterly, having a radius of 1,000.00
feet;
Thence northeasterly along said curve, also being the centerline of said
Nighthawk Pass, through a central angle of 18041'32", an arc distance of
326.24 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of 1,000.00
feet, through a central angle of 18041'32", an arc distance of 326.24
feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Nighthawk Pass North
40036'32" East, a distance of 884.29 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-
10-1 as South 40036'32" West, a distance of 884.29 feet) to the
intersection of the centerline of said Nighthawk Pass and said Butterfield
Stage Road;
Thence along the centerline of said Butterfield Stage Road North
49023'23" West, a distance of 1,514.00 feet (recorded in LAFCO No.
2000-10-1 as South 49023'23" East, a distance of 1,514.00 feet) to the
beginning of a tangent curve concave northeasterly, having a radius of
2,000.00 feet;
Thence northwesterly along said curve, also being the centerline of said
Butterfield Stage Road, through a central angle of 26025'50", an arc
distance of 922.60 feet (recorded in LAFCO No. 2000-10-1 as a radius of
2,000.00 feet, through a central angle of 26025'50", an arc distance of
922.60 feet);
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Butterfield Stage Road
North 22057'33" West, a distance of 55.54 feet (recorded in LAFCO No.
2000-10-1 as South 22057'33" East, a distance of 55.54 feet) to the
Page 13 of 14
;::-""")
to.,.., ~"""
, --.:,''-',:c',''
JfE""""">
. ,v,)! ~'?~\
. :7
II ~,}./) -03
EXHIBIT "A"
(continued)
LAFCO 2003-26-3
northeast corner of Parcel Map 23780 filed in Book 161 of Parcel Maps
at Pages 92 through 99 inclusive, records of said Riverside County;
Thence continuing along the centerline of said Butterfield Stage Road
North 22057'33" West, a distance of 238.79 feet (recorded in LAFCO
No. 2000-10-1 as South 22057'33" East, a distance of238.79 feet) to the
TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Contains.I,344 acres, more or less.
MWE/Igm
878-2A
10/28/03
Page 14 of14
MURRIETA
".
J
CAll.E
ESCADIi:RO
~
\.~ DEER
HOLLOW WAY
/lOT TO SCALE
VICINITY MAP
N
I
'"
r--
'"
SCALE: N.T.S.
DATE: 7 /31/03
~1
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDRAWK
TO THE CITY OF TEIdECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 876-2
KRIWER
,. <b
~TEW^R.T
IN COR P 0 R A r [D
EXHIBIT
"A"
3602 UniversilyAve.. Riverside, CA. 92501'909-6M-6900
F1GIJRI: I or 8
.
~
GRAPIDC SCALE
1000 0 500 1000 2000 JOOO
~.A.....- ....... ' I
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 5 SOUTHEASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
HWY. 79 .. :,~""",.,,:':':':c''''':':''!'':':':'''':':''':'::
....-:
...-:.<.":: ?~:~{t'. P.O.C. I ':V+~<L~01f:~BF.f~fQ&
...-:'. '. .:-::.:.,,:..!.. :.:.:.:.:.......,.... I ~ ":':".cSTAGE ROAD.:.....:.:.......
. .....:.~..:.~~T.P.O.s:. I
r..:.~:f@:;M REDHAWK VAIL! RAN~H
. .................................... PARKWAY I I
\tj~t.Qj~~;~ r---------t---~
PARALLON........::;-.. . I I
I ............................... <t VAIL RANCH PK
11Ii{'li;&i~m'ltt&t~~11L~t%t;(:?y.:::.~
m'JE~ "
';;'.%ljgllljll~'Ji#E;;5;'i · ~10
.................................S ~~ ........4..... ct. I--- t WOOLPERT
~...r............~:..
~.:.../@@WXUhX
*o~~LA ~. ~~~ltiltlll.:.:.:.:.:.::.:-:.:.:
FIGURE 4 \..... ........
,
ct. ANZA ~
ROAD
FIGURE 3
-. - EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARIY
PROPERTY LINE
J<.~
ct. DEER
HOLLOW WAY
LEGEND
r..........~
.-----.-----
............
STREET CENTERLINE
REDHAWK ANNEXATION AREA
ANNEXATION AREA=1344 ACRES, MORE OR LESS
IN COR P 0 RAT E 0
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDRAWK
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 '" 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3.
DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By,RAN W.O.: 878-2
EXHIBIT
KRIEGEQ
&
(j)TEWA12T
"A"
3602 University Ave.> Riverside, CA. 92501 . 909-684-6900
N
I
'"
:;:; SCALE: N.T.S. DATE: 7 /31/03
FIGURE 2 OF 8
..--.-.-....
.h_........
.------.....
.....n____ ............._nu.
':/,:::::::/'::",-:':':-:c:::/::~:::/:::PARCEL:..
"wi,l/filii
"""IlfIaig", 7~
t/tHgtKi~kEti%gEifLE~ilt~!.::-,. - \
:niiiEEtEt:ttEWt&:tW&ttWkWL:2o
EXISTING . :w~&t~ltl~;tr2~4tt;~t8illf?:~Zill1h~:_,_ ~\~._!/~':,.
PARCEL MAP . ~--,_:,:,:,:,:,:,,'t,\,>/ ,I. VAIL RANCH ]J.,.-,!".=-,:.:-:-,.,-~;,.:-:,,:-.
. ...................... "," ~.. -. -~....hC-.
17782 \';:::~>/':-'~' t BUTTERFIELD PARKWAY ~ . '-'~-':.I.r.:._
-.~ STAGE ROAD ----- '7
.,
~
\.- t ANZA
ROAD
o
.cd
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 1000 2000
I I I
1000
~
1 inch = 1000 It.
\..7
P.O.C.
\..\
SOUTH EASTERLY
. RIGHT-OF-WAY
HWY. 79
KRIEGER
~.t
~TIWART
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCWDE ANNEXATION OF REDRAWK
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
. DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W,O.: 678-2
INCORPORATEO
3000
I
/5
/;
EXHIBIT
"A"
FIGURE 3 OF 8
.,
<t VAIL RANCH '\ ~ .flXtZf.~
PARKWAY -tJ1'Jifjiiiji&,!
;>~~X:<\\<;~\////~::/:~::::':2~2/:':~::::::~;./::::;:::,~{;/~:~Y:::i:j:~"i/:::?'
"""""""..""""""""""""""'.'"",,,"""""""'."'"''''''Ti';'''..'''''''''''
f11~itltf~1:Jtltlli1tlf&!1iW>>"""""."""".".'. ....:'.'.:.:.:.::.:.:."'.I
.X!?/~:>X/X'A~:~X?>~~:~:::~:/" ~ t WOOLPERT
@~t%~iE~iLi~%EX:"i' I LANE
::::::;::;:::~~:::::::::;:~::::~::::::,,::;::::::;::,;. I
ii!~ii\lliliti:' I
.:~::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::::::~.~
t ANZA
ROAD
120 121 122
.............................................--.-- ................
.............-..--..---......-........................................
............................._u_.__..__.._..._...._......___..........
............... h _ _ n .h. _ .h. _ ___ _. __ ___ _ ... _ _ __. _ _ _ __. __ _ _ _ _ _ u. __ _ ___
____n___n______..___________._......__..._...........................
._...hnh.____u.__._____............................................
.......................__..................n..........__......u..h..
................................_..__......__..........................
............-........................_.................................
111"",,,,,,,,m!";;!"!'
~IJliUI~tlii~~ 1000 0
~~::::~::~~~T'/:::+}L26;f:~~::::::// ~-~
GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 2000
I I
::.,.....
.~,:~
500
I
1 inch = 1000 ft.
3000
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 678-2
KRIEGER
~
~TEW^RT
IN COR P 0 RA TE 0
N
1
'"
"-
'"
3602 University Ave.. Riverside, CA. 92501.909-684-6900
SCALE: 1"=1000'
DATE: 7 /31/03
EXHIBIT
"A"
FIGURE 4 OF 8
1000 0
~
GRAPHIC SCALE
500 1000 2000
I I I
1 inch = 1000 ft.
,
""
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK
TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND TIlE RIVERSIDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003~26-3
DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 676-2
KQleCEQ
-0/>
~TEWAQT
IN COR P 0 R" T E 0
3602 University Ave.- Riverside, CA. 92501- 909-684-6900
OJ
I
"'
:;; SCALE: 1"-1000' DATE: 7 /31/03
EXHIBIT
"A"
FIGURE 5 OF 8
"
".
<t. BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD
GRAPHIC SCALE
1000 0
~-~
500 1000
I I
--------- --
2000
I
3000
I
1 inch = 1000 ft.
SOUTHEASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY
HWY. 79
N
I
<0
....
<0
SCALE: 1"-1000'
DATE: 7 /31/03
(fij()
~,~
CITY OF TEMECULA
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDRAWK
TO TIlE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND TIlE RIVEllslDE
COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 878-2
EXHIBIT
KIlItGER
"'910
~TIWART
IN COR P 0 R II TED
" A"
3602 Unwersily Ave.' Riverside, CA. 92501 . 909-684-6900
I1GURE 6 OF 6
.'
OJ
I
U)
"
U)
COURSE SHEET
LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE LINE DIRECTION DISTANCE
11 S22'57'33"E 1016.04' L40 S45'58'28~W 416.34'
L2 N81'37'56~E 738.45' L41 N35'27'12~W 710.25'
L3 N81'37'56~E 1758.87' L42 N35'27' 12~W 88.47'
L4 N70'43'18"E 3539.21' L43 N53'34'28~W 726.59'
L5 S23'53'21 ~E 140.16' L44 N65'16'26~W 955.73'
L6 S71'11'03~W 3092.94' L45 N04'18'10"E 173.65'
L7 SI1'07'17~E 1273.78' L46 N86'19'25~E 119.99'
L8 S71'58'24~W 1051.49' L47 N3r24'25~E 300.15'
L9 S50'32'59~W 582.84' L48 N40'04'56~W 28.05'
LtO S39'52'38"W 2189.71' L49 N40'04'56~W 411.25'
Ltl S29'37'22"E 1305.54' L50 N21'13'I7"E 171.28'
Lt2 S73'1 0'23~W 449.26' L51 N20'23'03~E 286.33'
L13 S43'57'13"W 773.17' L52 N61'43'07"E 216.05'
Lt4 N46'46'24"W 210.00' L53 N81'33'01 ~E 315.81'
Lt5 S53'06'24"W 68.13' L54 S84'39'28~E 208.85'
Lt6 SOO'53'12"W 1143.59' L55 S48'39'1O"E 247.87'
Lt7 N88'20' 45"W 1450.44' L56 S69'39'18~E 336.15'
Lt8 S53'06'24~W 1510.57' L57 N70'44'12~E 452.93'
Lt9 SOO'14'33~E 1684.12' L58 S67'57'32~E 532.15'
L20 S88'21'31"E 393.97' L59 S63'29'28~E 282.47'
L21 S88'21 '31 "E 530.73' L60 N83'15'57"E 724.10'
L22 S88'21 '31 "E 372.65' L61 NI6'40'07~W 885.05'
L23 SOI'13'00"E 1278.36' L62 .S56' 41 '35 "w 654.72'
L24 N89'35' 41 ~W 1315.76' L63 N74'59'09~W 578.70'
L25 SOO'20'15"E 1306.96' L64 N53'08'15~W 36.74'
L26 N89'24' 49"W 1319.25' L65 N53'08'15~W 110.10'
L27 SOO'39'20~W 1335.55' L66 N80'54'34~W 250.04'
L28 N89'48'50"W 1993.66' L67 S88'20'52"W 193.02'
L29 N89'48'50"W 41.16' L68 N70'01 '39~W 199.56'
L30 N43'01 '34"W 520.55' L69 N86'59'58"W 141.49'
L31 N44'49'36~W 372.50' L70 NOO'31'07~W 305.00'
L32 N42'23'18~E 2254.53' L71 NOO'31 '07~W 263.08'
l33 N24'50' 41 ~W 832.36' L72 N21'16'25~W 858.96'
L34 N30'48'15"W 1705.39' L73 S88'17'35"E 523.72'
l35 N61'02'24~W 448.25' L74 N63'50'16"E 285.06'
L36 N61'02'24~W 169.00' L75 N46'30'39"W 215.14'
L37 N45'33'18"W 711.38' L76 N04'04'38~W 148.52'
L38 N45'48'11"E 415.51' L77 N50'01 '58"E 360.94'
l39 N41'21 '23"W 442.13' ~\.~ lAHD SV,p
~ ~~, A. #..:: ~
--.;:j ~""
~rOVED BY THE * Exp. 12-3H15 *
LO~AL ~ CY PjRi710N COMMISION
j/\ ~; .L r- .;?()- tJ:? .J ~ n. ~ /
7. ~. /; or CAl~? ()
KRIEGER CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT
=,g. REORGANIZATION TO INCUJDE ANNEXATION OF REDHAWK . "A"
~TEW^I2T I" C D R P 0 R AT E 0 TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND TIlE RIVERSIDE
J602UnivefsilyAve.' Rivers;de, CA. 92501'909-684-6900 COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003~26-3
SCALE: N/A DATE: 7/31/03 DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED By:RAN W.O.: 676-2 !lGUR!: 7 OF 6
..
"
N
I
'"
f"-
'"
COURSE SHEET
LINE OIRECTlON DI5TANCE CURVE TABLE
L78 N63'23'04"[ 66.83' CURVE LENGTH RADIU5 DELTA
L79 N73'22'll"E 391. 17' Cl. 73.58 3000.00 01'24'19"
L80 N16'37'49"W 225.00' C2 799.79 4200.00 10'54'38"
L81 N73'22' 11"E 2028.71 ' C3 345.25 1200.00 16'29'04 "
L82 516'37'49"E 283.00' C4 167.12 1200.00 07'58'45"
L83 N73'22'll"E 283.00' C5 480.90 1200.00 22'57' 41 "
L84 N16'37'49"W 283.00' C6 730.05 1200.00 34'51'27"
L85 N73'22' 11"[ 957.76' C7 189.48 630.00 17'13'56"
L86 516'37'49"E 754,15' C8 110.08 1000.00 06'18'25"
L87 568'58'51"W 3161.86' C9 501.22 1600.00 17'56'55"
L88 N8rOl '26"W 126.59' Cl0 856.40 1200.00 40'53'24 "
L89 533'46'37"W 50.00' C11 856.40 1200.00 40'53'24"
L90 556'13'23"E 1287.57' C12 438.49 4000.00 06'16'51"
L91 521'21'57"[ 297,87' C13 . 368.59 2500.00 08'26'51"
L92 538'35'53"E 160.53' C14- 615.80 1000.00 35'16'58"
L93 584'Ol'58"E 203,69' C15 864.18 1000.00 49'30'49"
L94 566'05'03"E 742.19' C16 326.24 1000.00 18'41'32"
L95 N73'Ol'33"E 552.40' C17 922.60 2000.00 26'25'50"
L96 566'05'03"E 545.80'
L97 572'21'54"[ 719.17'
L98 N16'42'47"E 101.80'
L99 N18'34'll"W 134.68'
L100 N71'25'49"[ 130.56'
L101 N21'55'OO"E 167.64'
L102 N40'36'32"[ 884.29'
L103 N49'23'23"W 1514.00'
L104 N22'57'33"W 55.54'
L105 N22'57'33"W 238.79'
~~ lAND SI/J'.
~C; 'I':.
1APPROYED BY THE ~\' A. #..: ~
L~ fJ=:.NT;/1,fMATION COMMISION ~ ~,..,
,~ If -do-t?3 * Exp. 12-3H)5 *
'f I ~ 738~ 4"'/~
( J ..2.. t. OF c~ld~
- '\" . I -1'1.....1.
KRIEGER CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT
REORGANIZATION TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION OF REDRAWK "A"
=(!,
~T~W^RT t" COR POll; ATE 0 TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CONCURRENT DETACHMENTS
FROM COUNTY SERVICE AREAS 143 & 152 AND THE RIVERSIDE
3602 University Ave.. Riverside, CA. 92501 . 909-684-6900 COUNTY WASTE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
LAFCO 2003-26-3
SCALE: N/A DATE: 7 /31/03 DRAWN BY:MWE CHECKED BY;RAN W.O.; B7B 2 I1GURE B OF 8
"