The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07112023 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 11, 2023 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Zak Schwank INVOCATION: Robin McCoy of Women Organizing Women, Inc. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Brown, Kalfus, Schwank, Stewart BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Fire Department (CAL FIRE) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited . Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports . CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request Page 1 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters on the Consent Calendar . Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca .gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Recommendation: Agenda ReportAttachments: 2.Approve Action Minutes of June 13, 2023 That the City Council approve the action minutes of June 13, 2023.Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: 3.Approve List of Demands That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - MAY 30, 2023 - JUNE 8, 2023 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - JUNE 13, 2023 - JUNE 26, 2023 Recommendation: Agenda Report Resolution - May 30 - June 8, 2023 List of Demands - May 30 - June 8, 2023 Resolution - June 13 - June 26, 2023 List of Demands - June 13 - June 26, 2023 Attachments: 4.Approve a Five-Year Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Through Fiscal Year 2027-28 (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Pro Tem Page 2 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 Stewart and Council Member Kalfus) That the City Council approve a Five-Year Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 2023-24 through Fiscal Year 2027-28. Recommendation: Agenda Report Agreement Attachments: 5.Approve Memorandum of Understanding Between the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula for Vector Control Services and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula for Vector Control Services and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. Recommendation: Agenda Report Memorandum of Understanding Attachments: 6.Adopt the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan That the City Council adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2022 CITY OF TEMECULA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ANNEX TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Recommendation: Agenda Report Resolution 2022 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Attachments: 7.Accept Easements Dedicated to the Public in Connection with the Sommers Bend Development and Authorization to Quitclaim Said Easement to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE Recommendation: Page 3 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 TRANSFER TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA’S INTEREST IN AND TO A CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO TRACT MAP 37368 AND TRACT MAP 37341-13 IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOMMERS BEND SOUTH LOOP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Agenda Report Resolution Quitclaim Deed Attachments: 8.Approve Tract Maps 37925, 37926 and 37928 (Located at the Northwest Corner of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road) That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Maps 37925, 37926, and 37928 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; and 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the Developer; and 3. Approve the Subdivision Monumentation Agreement with the Developer; and 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. Recommendation: Agenda Report Fees and Securities Report Vicinity Map Tract Map 37925 Tract Map 37926 Tract Map 37928 Attachments: 9.Establish All-Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF WOLF CREEK DRIVE NORTH AND REDWOOD ROAD/ALPINE PLACE AND FINDING THAT THE Recommendation: Page 4 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis Attachments: 10.Approve First Amendment with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc. for Lake and Pond Maintenance Services for Fiscal Years 2024-27 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc ., to provide Lake and Pond Maintenance Services for Fiscal Years 2024-27, in the amount of $600,000. Recommendation: Agenda Report First Amendment Attachments: 11.Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01 That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Recommendation: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release Attachments: RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 5 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Brown, Kalfus, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited . Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited . Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 12.Approve Action Minutes of June 13, 2023 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of June 13, 2023.Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: 13.Approve Agreement with Anthony J. Moramarco dba Bigfoot Graphics for Graphic Design, Event and Professional Goods and Services That the Board of Directors approve the agreement with Anthony J . Moramarco dba Bigfoot Graphics for graphic design, event and professional goods and services. Recommendation: Agenda Report Agreement Attachments: 14.Approve Agreement with BAMM Promotional Products, Inc. for Screen Printing, Embroidery, Artwork, and Promotional Items Page 6 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 That the Board of Directors approve the agreement with BAMM Promotional Products, Inc. for screen printing, embroidery, artwork, and promotional items. Recommendation: Agenda Report Agreement Attachments: CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, July 25, 2023, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 7 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca .gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant’s position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker’s time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 15.Adopt Resolution Reconfirming the Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Local Development Mitigation Fee Applicable to All Developments in the Plan Area Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.10.050.d That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECONFIRMING THE AUTOMATIC ANNUAL FEE ADJUSTMENT IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PLAN AREA PURSUANT TO Recommendation: Page 8 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.10.050.D AND MAKING CEQA FINDINGS (LR23-0221) Agenda Report Resolution WRCRCA Notice of Implementation Letter MSHCP Local Development Fee Schedule FY 2024 Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 16.Adopt Resolution to Approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2023-24 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Recommendation: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A - Proposed Rates Attachments: DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (RECEIVE AND FILE) 17.City Council Travel/Conference Report Agenda Report ICSC Schedule Washington DC Itinerary Attachments: 18.Community Development Department Monthly Report Agenda Report Planning Activity Report Attachments: 19.Police Department Monthly Report Agenda ReportAttachments: ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item Page 9 City Council Agenda July 11, 2023 on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, July 25, 2023, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk’s Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 10 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City’s website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 13, 2023 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council convened in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the acquisition of certain property interests, including certain permanent maintenance and access easements, temporary construction easements with a term of twelve months, covenants for construction of certain permanent improvements, and a conservation easement on four properties described below in connection with the proposed extension of Nicolas Road from its current termination at Calle Girasol easterly to Butterfield Stage Road, Project Number LD20-1114 (“Project”). Negotiators for the City are Patrick Thomas and Ron Moreno. The negotiators for the respective real property interests are set forth below. (i) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 31249 Indian Summer Drive in the City of Temecula (APN 957-090-022). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 83,324 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months, covenant authorizing the construction of certain p ermanent improvements in portions of that 83,324 square foot area, and an approximate 51,003 square foot conservation easement. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Lam Ngo and Huyen Lam Tran. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. (ii) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 39622 Leifer Road in the City of Temecula (APN 957-090-023). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 31,168 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months, covenant authorizing the construction of certain permanent improvements in portions of that 31,168 square foot area. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Isaac G. Navejar and Isabel L. Navejar, as Co-Trustees of the Navejar Living Trust, U/A dated July 18, 2019. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Mayor Zak Schwank INVOCATION: Sylvester Scott of Baha'is of Temecula FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Brown, Kalfus, Schwank, Stewart BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission, Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission and Traffic Safety Commission 2 PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriff's Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON-AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Frederic Ball • David Wilson • Joi Ji • Jeffrey A. Wittek • John Moore • Dean Vasquez • Savannah Sieja • Canine Support Teams • Judy Farnetti PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Lee Rosu (Item #21) • Steve Sommers (Item #21) • Louis Todd (Item #21) • Bob Kowell (Item #22) • Stephen Benavides (Item #21) All electronic comments received were made a part of the record of the meeting. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. Approve Action Minutes of May 23 and May 25, 2023 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of May 23 and May 25, 2023. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 4. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-04 Amending Chapter 10.44 of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Golf Carts on City Roadways (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2023-04 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 10.44 OF TITLE 10 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DESIGNATE CERTAIN STREETS AND CROSSINGS FOR THE JOINT USE OF GOLF CARTS AND VEHICLES AND ESTABLISH RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE OPERATION OF GOLF CARTS ON SUCH STREETS, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 5. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-05 Amending Section 10.28.010(D) of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Prima Facie Speed Limits on Certain Streets (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2023-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 10.28.010(D) OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS 6. Adopt Ordinance No. 2023-06 Repealing Temecula Municipal Code Chapters 2.44 and 2.48 Regarding Commissions (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2023-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REPEALING CHAPTER 2.44 AND CHAPTER 2.48 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AND THE COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION 7. Adopt Resolution Approving the Statement of Investment Policy and Delegating Investment Authority to the City Treasurer Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY AND DELEGATING INVESTMENT AUTHORITY TO THE CITY TREASURER 8. Approve Annual Renewal of City Insurance Policies Recommendation: That the City Council approve the following insurance policies and renewals and appropriate an additional $83,000 to Fund 300 - Insurance to cover the increased premiums: 1. 1st Excess Liability insurance with Illinois Union Insurance Company, in the amount of $347,099.58, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 2. 2nd Excess Liability insurance with Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company, in the amount of $305,447.88, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 3. 3rd Excess Liability insurance with Starstone Specialty Insurance Company, in the amount of $260,667.90, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 4. Excess Workers’ Compensation insurance with Arch Insurance Company, in the amount of $155,584.00, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 5. Property & Equipment Breakdown insurance with Hanover Insurance Company, in the amount of $168,130.35 for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 6. Difference in Conditions (Earth Movement and Flood) insurance with Steadfast Insurance Company and QBE Specialty Insurance Company in the amount of $350,605.64, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 7. Auto Physical Damage insurance with Hanover Insurance Company, in the amount of $25,783.00, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 8. Cyber Liability insurance with Houston Casualty Company, in the amount of $51,750.97, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 9. Crime insurance with Allmerica Financial Benefit Insurance Company, in the amount of $2,660.00, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 5 10. Pollution/Environmental Legal Liability insurance with Illinois Union Insurance Company, in the amount of $10,978.41, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 11. Volunteer Accident insurance with Berkley Life & Health Insurance Company, in the amount of $976.80, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 12. Standalone Terrorism Liability, Business Interruption, and Property Damage insurance with Lloyd’s Syndicate 33, in the amount of $8,234.25, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024; and 13. Drone Coverage with ACE American Insurance Company, in the amount of $3,456.00, for the period of July 1, 2023 to July 1, 2024. 9. Approve Third Amendment to the Broker Fee Agreement Between the City and Arthur J. Gallagher & Risk Management Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve a resolution entitled: RESOLUITON NO. 2023-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE BROKER FEE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC 10. Approve First Amendment with AppleOne for Temporary Staffing Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the first amendment to the agreement with AppleOne, to increase the payment amount of $135,000 for a total agreement amount of $300,000. 11. Adopt Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of the Annual Inspection Report Pursuant to SB 1205 Recommendation:That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE MARSHAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE SB 1205 STATE MANDATED ANNUAL INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13145, 13146 AND 17921 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE 6 12. Approve Recycled Water Agreements with Rancho California Water District for Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park and Presley Development Recommendation: That the City Council approve the recycled water agreements with Rancho California Water District (RCWD), for the use of recycled water at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park and Presley Development - Service Level C Zone 513, in association with the RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program. 13. Approve Agreement with Yunex, LLC, for On-Call Traffic Signal and Street Light Maintenance Services for Fiscal Years 2024-28 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the agreement with Yunex, LLC, for on-call traffic signal and street light maintenance services for fiscal years 2024-28, in the amount of $1,000,000. 14. Approve Amendment No. 1 to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Agreement to Reimburse TUMF Funds with Western Riverside Council of Governments for the Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Recommendation: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 1 to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program Agreement to reimburse TUMF Funds with Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for the Diaz Road Expansion (Western Bypass - Rancho California Road to Cherry Street), City Project No. PW17-25, and Authorize the City Manager to execute the Amendment. 15. Approve First Amendment to the Agreement with Aztec Landscape, Inc. d/b/a Aztec Janitorial, Inc., for Janitorial Services for Park Restrooms for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the first amendment to the minor maintenance agreement for janitorial services for park restrooms with Aztec Landscaping, Inc., d/b/a Aztec Janitorial, Inc., in the amount of $114,965.16 for Fiscal Year 2023-2024, for a total contract amount of $295,110.12; and 2. Approve contingency for extra work in the amount of $11,497, which is approximately 10% of the agreement amount. 16. Approve Second Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Mariposa Tree Management, Inc., for Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the minor maintenance agreement with Mariposa Tree Management, Inc., for citywide tree trimming maintenance services, in the amount of $700,000. 17. Approve Third Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services with Nieves Landscape, Inc. 7 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the third amendment to the minor maintenance agreement for landscape maintenance services with Nieves Landscape, Inc., in the amount of $2,836,584 for fiscal year 2023-24, and approve contingency for extra work in the amount of $567,316.80, which is 20% of the FY 2023-24 agreement amount. RECESS: At 6:54 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 6:58 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL, COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING 21. Approve Fiscal Years 2024-28 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Adopt Fiscal Year 2023-24 CIP and Annual Operating Budgets for the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2023-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2024-28 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2023-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 PRELIMINARY ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. SARDA 2023-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2024-28, ADOPTING THE CAPITAL 8 IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS RESOLUTION NO. 2023-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET, ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS, ESTABLISHING CONTRACT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER, ESTABLISHING LAWSUIT SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION NO. 2023-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. 2023-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Brown, Second by Kalfus. The vote reflected unanimous approval. BUSINESS 22. Approve Amendment No. 6 to City Manager Aaron Adams’ Employment Agreement Recommendation: That the City Council approve Amendment No. 6 to City Manager Aaron Adams’ Employment Agreement. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Brown, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT The City Attorney stated there was no reportable actions from closed session. 9 ADJOURNMENT At 8:35 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 27, 2023, at 5:00 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Pam Espinoza, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A – MAY 30, 2023 – JUNE 8, 2023 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A – JUNE 13, 2023 – JUNE 26, 2023 BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City’s policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolutions 2. List of Demands 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - MAY 30, 2023 - JUNE 8, 2023 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager’s Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 13,419,195.36. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 05/31/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN:120,148.39 06/01/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN:10,475,754.90 06/06/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN:1,304,056.27 06/08/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN:528,622.65 06/01/2023 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:99,445.38 06/08/2023 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:891,167.77 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07/11/2023 COUNCIL MEETING: 13,419,195.36$ CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS 001 GENERAL FUND 9,117,873.28 110 COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT 40,388.04 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 22,969.76 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 11,331.26 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 375,823.20 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 26,464.50 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,759.63 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 4,804.16 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 64,258.74 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,056,269.16 300 INSURANCE FUND 33,681.35 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 33,345.38 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 1,338.69 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 96,466.48 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,202.98 340 FACILITIES 68,624.02 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,433,905.37 481 TRUSTEE ADMIN FEES 88.50 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 154.65 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 288.38 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 35.79 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 628.35 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 251.35 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 279.04 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 2,509.77 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 79.55 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 200.57 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 42.96 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 1,200.31 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 280.74 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 118.52 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 254.69 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 35.79 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 673.75 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 159.70 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 3,773.68 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 35.79 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 24,299.62 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 122.92 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 58.48 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 410.71 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 24.51 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 68.09 12,428,582.21$ DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: PAYROLL 001 GENERAL FUND 561,802.08 110 COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT 856.21 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 642.84 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,419.56 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 248,508.05 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 3,178.58 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 302.57 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 5,042.13 300 INSURANCE FUND 4,573.11 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 4,572.98 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 68,902.58 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,773.87 340 FACILITIES 10,557.17 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 71,481.42 990,613.15$ TOTAL BY FUND:13,419,195.36$ 05/30/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 12:23:04PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,623.4179 FIELD HOCKEY INC0207246/1/2023504762 1,623.41 PIANO TUNING/MAINT: THEATER 560.00ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES DBA, ALLEGRO PIANO SERVICE 0093746/1/2023504763 560.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBEARD, RYAN, DBA SPORTS SAINTS 0232406/1/2023504764 1,925.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,512.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,428.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,008.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 756.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 756.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 588.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 514.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 504.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 420.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 420.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 336.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 10,419.50252.00 WATER DLVRY SVCS: FOCBLUETRITON BRANDS INC, DBA READYREFRESH 0013236/1/2023504765 154.20 WATER DLVRY SVCS: PBSP 57.03 WATER DLVRY SVCS: TES POOL 40.42 WATER DLVRY SVCS: TES POOL 31.95 WATER DLVRY SVCS: TES POOL 30.21 WATER DLVRY SVCS: TES POOL 20.43 WATER DLVRY SVCS: SKATE PARK 354.2420.00 MAY PLANTSCAPE SVC: CIVIC CTR 500.00BRAUN PETER, DBA TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE 0215886/1/2023504766 500.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 369.60BRIGHTON HILL ACADEMY, SPORTS & LEARNING ACADEMY 0225186/1/2023504767 369.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBRYANT, ROBERT0229486/1/2023504768 1,097.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 627.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 627.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 324.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,990.40313.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBUCHER, BRET PHILLIP0215026/1/2023504769 1,344.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 882.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,674.00448.00 1Page: 05/30/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 12:23:04PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # APR-JUN MONTHLY MAINT: HOUSING: PLNG 1,740.00CITY DATA SERVICES LLC0229406/1/2023504770 1,740.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR 158.19CLEARSTAR INC0227906/1/2023504771 158.19 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00COX, KRISTI LYN0175426/1/2023504772 280.00 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG & SAFETY DOWNS ENERGY FUEL0041926/1/2023504773 227.50 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE D 129.40 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE EN 87.04 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MA 2,282.27 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS 1,036.90 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC 424.22 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW 4,519.62332.29 MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 1,095.00HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL GROUP INC, DBA FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA 0011356/1/2023504774 1,095.00 BUSINESS CARDS: LAND DEV: PW 154.26JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 0218966/1/2023504775 154.26 APR DSGN CONSULTANT SVCS: CHERRY ST EXT 13,445.75MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY INC 0213706/1/2023504776 13,445.75 APR CDBG PRGM ADMIN: PLANNINGMDG ASSOCIATES INC0186756/1/2023504777 4,843.13 APR ADA LABOR COMPLIANCE: PW2 1,256.89 APR CDBG-CV EMER MORTG ASSIS 435.63 APR ADA LABOR COMPLIANCE: PW1 6,663.78128.13 ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: CIVIC CTR MODIFICATI MILLER ARCHITECTURAL CORP 0213436/1/2023504778 500.00 900.00ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: CIVIC CTR M 400.00 LED REPLACEMENT: TEMEKU HILLS PARK MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0040436/1/2023504779 1,629.51 1,690.29ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS MAI 60.78 2ND SAT. ART ROOM ACTIVITY: TVMMORAMARCO ANTHONY J, DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 0040406/1/2023504780 800.00 COMMUNITY MURAL PROJ: TCSD 700.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,588.2088.20 ROD RUN CLEANUP SVCS: PARKS: PWNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC0225996/1/2023504781 12,000.00 15,270.00LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS: CRC: PW 3,270.00 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 109.91NPG INC DBA, GOLDSTAR ASPHALT PRODUCTS 0141736/1/2023504782 109.91 2Page: 05/30/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 12:23:04PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HROCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 0211216/1/2023504783 38.00 76.00PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: H 38.00 VEHICLE REPAIR: PARKS: PW 703.44OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE INC 0219986/1/2023504784 703.44 CONSULTANT SVCS: STREETLIGHTS: PW22-17 4,200.00OMB ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS INC, SALAS OBRIEN 0232046/1/2023504785 4,200.00 STUDENT-LED THEATER: ALICE IN WONDERLAND 800.00PATTON, VICTORIA0231696/1/2023504786 800.00 UNIFORM SVCS: STREETS: DUPLICATE CREDIT PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY0050756/1/2023504787 272.30 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CRC 31.45 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MPS 24.52 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: IWT 22.73 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: LIBR 19.88 UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW 19.74 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TCC 14.32 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TVM 12.74 FLOOR MATS/TOWELS RENTALS: FO 10.28 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 10.28 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: THE 9.89 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 4.62 UNIFORM SVCS: STREETS: PW 412.73-40.02 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 0225376/1/2023504788 307.45 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: THEATER 74.79 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN M 20.40 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 400.42-2.22 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICESRICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 0024126/1/2023504789 16,314.91 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 12,832.23 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 4,130.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 969.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 952.47 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 405.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 181.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 115.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 35,926.1126.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSROBERTS, PATRICIA G0143476/1/2023504790 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 176.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 646.80176.40 3Page: 05/30/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 12:23:04PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: YOUTH INNOVATION CONF 275.00SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 0176996/1/2023504791 275.00 SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA23-0071: PLNG SIGNS BY TOMORROW0097466/1/2023504792 427.50 SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA23-0023: PL 427.50 SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA23-0025 213.75 SIGN POSTING SVCS: PA22-0722: PL 1,282.50213.75 LEGAL SRVCS: PLANNING 104.40TELECOM LAW FIRM PC0213616/1/2023504793 104.40 RFRSHMNTS: ACE EVENT 5/12/23 308.19URBANE CAFE, TGH ENTERPRISES LLC 0197936/1/2023504794 308.19 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 623.00WADDLETON, JEFFREY L0181476/1/2023504795 623.00 OCT '22 MSHCP PAYMENT 7,283.65WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO REG, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY 0084026/1/2023504796 7,283.65 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK:120,148.39 4Page: 05/30/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 12:23:04PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:35 120,148.39 5Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 148,281.85PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 0002465/22/202314935 148,281.85 STATE TAX PAYMENT 42,224.40INSTATAX EDD0004445/25/202314978 42,224.40 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 125,208.67INSTATAX IRS0002835/25/202314979 125,208.67 '17 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS DEBT SRVC 1,433,905.37U S BANK0054605/18/202314984 1,433,905.37 FUNDS FOR WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 30,000.00ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC 0180985/25/202314985 30,000.00 VARIOUS APR/MAY INTERNET SVCS 2,925.05FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC0188585/22/202314988 2,925.05 VARIOUS APR WATER SVCS 5,675.24EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DIST 0023905/23/202314989 5,675.24 ACTIVITY GUIDE: CLASSES: TCSD 35,786.04ADVANTAGE MAILING LLC, DBA ADVANTAGE 0135826/1/2023212542 35,786.04 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT0039516/1/2023212543 262.78 496.56ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT 233.78 MUSIC LICENSE: TCSD 1,088.00ALLTRACK PERFORMING RIGHTS LLC 0233266/1/2023212544 1,088.00 MUSIC LICENSE: TCSD 308.00AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS 0035206/1/2023212545 308.00 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCSDBAKER AND TAYLOR INC0119546/1/2023212546 2,542.05 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 49.95 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 647.68 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 123.24 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 33.50 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 1,066.96 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 531.19 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 50.82 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 106.39 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 5,176.5524.77 STAFF APPAREL: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD 2,692.22BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC 0155926/1/2023212547 2,692.22 1Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 280.00CANTRELL, TINA J0210546/1/2023212548 280.00 MAY JANITORIAL SVCS: CITY FACS 21,235.02CCS SAN DIEGO JANITORIAL INC, DBA CCS FACILITY SERVICES 0229306/1/2023212549 21,235.02 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STA 84: FIRE 120.01COMPLETE OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA, INC 0231756/1/2023212550 120.01 REFUND: ROD RUN CANCELLED 35.00COPELAND, WENDY0222046/1/2023212551 35.00 REHAB TRAILER: TCC: FIRE DEPT 898.98COSTCO TEMECULA 4910012646/1/2023212552 898.98 MISC SUPPLIES: SPEC EVENTS: TCSDCOSTCO TEMECULA 4910043296/1/2023212553 355.10 MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCS 1,799.46 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD 2,258.14103.58 REIMB: ICSC CONF: ECO DEV 270.44008533 EMPLOYEE #003816/1/2023212554 270.44 REIMB: TYLER CONNECT CONF: PW 32.75021515 EMPLOYEE #005876/1/2023212555 32.75 CNSTRCTN MGMT SVCS: SANTA GERTRUDIS CRK 4,602.44FALCON ENGINEERING SERVICES 0194696/1/2023212556 4,602.44 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPTFEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/1/2023212557 62.31 70.48EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPT 8.17 MAY INTERNET SVCS: CIVIC CTR 828.75FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC0188586/1/2023212558 828.75 VEHICLE INSPECTION: MPSC: TCSD 318.00GREENPOWER MOTOR COMPANY INC 0225346/1/2023212559 318.00 REIMB: CPRS CONF: TCSD 102.17023378 EMPLOYEE #072196/1/2023212560 102.17 FY 22/23 DISCRTIONARY GRANT FUNDS 2,500.00HARDING, SHAREEN V0233816/1/2023212561 2,500.00 FY 22/23 DISCRETIONARY GRANT FUNDS 5,000.00HIS LITTLE FEET INC0233696/1/2023212562 5,000.00 STTLMNT: GARTH BROOKS TRIBUTE 5/26 JAMES ELLIOTT ENTERTAINMENT 0183526/1/2023212563 4,548.16 8,223.48STTLMNT: DOORS TRIBUTE 5/27 3,675.32 2Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # TROPHIES: TVM: TCSD 84.83KRACH BREE B, DBA TEMECULA TROPHY & DES 0171186/1/2023212564 84.83 STTLMNT: ROLLING STONES TRIBUTE 5/19 LA JOLLA BOOKING AGENCY AKA, GEORGE ANDREW NAGLE 0137976/1/2023212565 4,808.15 5,507.15STTLMNT: OLIVIA NEWTON JOHN TR 699.00 GREETING CARDS: GIFT SHOP: TVMLEANIN TREE INC0211246/1/2023212566 1,015.50 GREETING CARDS: GIFT SHOP: TVM -0.98 GREETING CARDS: GIFT SHOP: TVM 814.52-200.00 JUMPER/GAME RENTALL: SPEC EVENTS: TCSD 850.00M AND J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC, DBA JOLLY JUMPS 0048136/1/2023212567 850.00 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA ATHACO INC 0037826/1/2023212568 517.20 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: 59.26 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: 822.13245.67 FY22/23 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PRGM 10,000.00NESTMATE FRANCHISE GROUP INC, NESTLE TOLL HOUSE CAFE 0233596/1/2023212569 10,000.00 TOOL & EQUIP: STREET MAINT: PW 428.75NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC0002096/1/2023212570 428.75 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE 57.83OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV 0039646/1/2023212571 57.83 REFUND: CITATION 15982: CODE ENFORCEMENT 300.00PUBLIC HOUSE0133376/1/2023212572 300.00 RENEW PERMIT: SNACK BAR: SAM HICKS PARK 156.00RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 0013656/1/2023212573 156.00 STAFFING: LIBRARY 34,580.00RIVERSIDE CO ECO DEV AGENCY, LIBRARY DIV 0140276/1/2023212574 34,580.00 FPARC-TM, INV 235012, 22/23, Q2 2,901,283.39RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPARTMENT 0002676/1/2023212575 2,901,283.39 ADDITIONAL DEP REQ: MURRRIETA CREEK: CIP 357.42RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD CONTROL AND, WATER CONSERVATION DIST 0004116/1/2023212576 357.42 APR EMERG RADIO RENTALS: EOC 77.67RIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION 0227156/1/2023212577 77.67 3Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 03/09/23-04/05/23 LAW ENFORCEMENTRIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 0004066/1/2023212578 2,835,857.94 5,599,441.2302/09/23-03/08/23 LAW ENFORCEMEN 2,763,583.29 REIMB: GOV'T SOCIAL MEDIA CONF 577.04023099 EMPLOYEE #006146/1/2023212579 577.04 COUNTRY LIVE! @ THE MERC 5/20 742.50SANBORN GWYNETH A, CO TEMECULA MUSIC ACADEMY 0099806/1/2023212580 742.50 ENG SURVEY SVCS: SIDEWALK: PW22-16 SB&O INC0213096/1/2023212581 9,602.00 ADA TRANSITION PLAN: PW18-16: C 3,433.20 12/22-05/14 ENG: CITYWIDE SDWLKS 13,941.20906.00 REIMB: RFRSHMNTS: PTSC COMMISSION 020922 EMPLOYEE #005296/1/2023212582 78.00 958.02REIMB: TYLER CONNECT CONF: PW 880.02 FY 23/24 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP DUES 1,030.00SISTER CITIES INTERNATIONAL 0006976/1/2023212583 1,030.00 REFUND: SHOW TICKET CREDITS 202.00SLOWINSKI, STANLEY0233776/1/2023212584 202.00 FY 22/23 COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PRGM 10,000.00SOURCE POINT PRODUCTS & SRVCS, DBA FULLY PROMOTED OF 0205486/1/2023212585 10,000.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: FIRE STA 12 74.00SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 0005196/1/2023212586 74.00 STTLMNT: JOURNEY THROUGH DECADES 5/7 1,490.01SOUTHWEST WOMENS CHORUS 0093796/1/2023212587 1,490.01 RFRSHMNTS: AQUATICS GUARDS MTG: TCSD 140.89STADIUM PIZZA INC0002936/1/2023212588 140.89 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT0083376/1/2023212589 372.13 MISC. OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW 38.25 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD 357.18 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CIP: PW 27.18 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: THEATER: -49.31 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: HUMAN SV -326.91 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD 628.10209.58 GPS LOCATE: TEM SHERIFF 25.00T MOBILE USA INC0209116/1/2023212590 25.00 MISC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKSTEMECULA WINNELSON COMPANY 0039416/1/2023212591 83.04 MISC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: LIBRAR 587.25 MISC PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS 826.89156.60 4Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # UTILITY CART: AQUATICS: TCSD 625.59ULINE INC0116596/1/2023212592 625.59 MISC SUPPLIES: SPECIAL GAMES: TCSD WALMART0079876/1/2023212593 390.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCSD 101.17 WORKFORCE PRGMS: SUPPLIES: TC 348.67 MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 117.69 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 157.18 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 1,448.99333.93 STTLMNT: COASTER, DRIFTERS & PLATTERS TR WEST COAST PERFORMING, ARTS PRESENTERS 0123436/1/2023212594 3,802.05 7,681.14STTLMNT: TOM PETTY HEARTBREA 3,879.09 REFUND: CANCELED SHOW TICKETS 59.00ZAUN, MADELINE0233766/1/2023212595 59.00 Grand total for UNION BANK:10,475,754.90 5Page: 06/01/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 4:26:47PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:61 10,475,754.90 6Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 14961 5/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA SFTWR RENEWAL: INFO TECHYAHOO FLICKR011998 71.99 HDONTAP: LIVE STREAMING: INFO TECH IP VIDEO SPECIALISTS INC022527 348.00 SOFTWARE 4K UPGRADE: INFO TECHVMIX.COM021837 350.00 ELECTRONIC RECYCLING: INFO TECHELIAN ELECTRONICS RECYCLYING 023354 250.00 LODGING: ARUBA CONF: INFO TECHVENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC 012081 -1,561.24 REGIST: STATE OF THE CITY: INFO TECH TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF, COMMERCE 000515 140.00 MEMBERSHIP: INFO TECHMUNICIPAL INFO SYS ASSN OF CAL 005872 65.00 LODGING: ARUBA CONF: INFO TECHVENETIAN CASINO RESORT, LLC 012081 1,561.24 MISC SUPPLIES: CABLE MGMT: INFO TECH FASTENATION INC020392 111.82 SUBSCRIPTIONS: HARVESTON: INFO TECH RING.COM021342 200.00 ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: CITY CNL 1,539.80APPLE STORE013338 2.99 14973 5/17/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA REPAIR & MAINT: PROPANE DUI CHECKPOINT TEMECULA VALLEY RV SERVICE INC 003067 42.52 RFRSHMNTS: VOLUNTEERS DUI CHECK: PD IN N OUT BURGER INC018389 24.71 LODGING: ICI TECH COURSE: POLICESHERATON HOTEL006714 704.34 BANK FEES: INTEREST CHARGE 781.90 10.33 Grand total for UNION BANK: 2,321.70 1Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # CONST CONTRACT SVCS: CRC RENO PH 1 ACT 1 CONSTRUCTION INC0230626/8/2023 504797 689,181.02 909,978.19CONST CONTRACT SVCS: CRC RENO PH 1 220,797.17 RE-CONSTITUTE: ERRCA/DAS: EOC 335.00AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, ENTERPRISES 0225466/8/2023 504798 335.00 ERGONOMIC SUPPLIES: HRAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 0072826/8/2023 504799 452.33 BUSINESS PRIME MEMBERSHIP: FINANCE 1,412.66 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: INFO TECH 49.75 STATION EQUIPMENT: FIRE DEPT 9.78 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: ECO DEV 10.16 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CREDIT: HR -34.99 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY CLERK 340.10 MISC. OFC SUPPLIES: ECO DEV 284.54 MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: HR 245.05 MISC TOOLS & EQUIP: INFO TECH 938.07 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE 4,523.41 815.96 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIFF AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES AFN 0042406/8/2023 504800 62.01 529.97DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIFF 467.96 MAY DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC CTR 213.97AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO0139506/8/2023 504801 213.97 STTLMNT: BRAZILIAN & LATIN JAZZ 5/19 990.55ARJONA, GLORIA0230306/8/2023 504802 990.55 CDBG FY 22/23 Subrecipient Community 7,226.00ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TEMECULA, VALLEY 0014456/8/2023 504803 7,226.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSB G P RECREATION INC0171496/8/2023 504804 2,675.40 5,497.80TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,822.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBEARD, RYAN, DBA SPORTS SAINTS 0232406/8/2023 504805 504.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 385.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 598.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,795.50 308.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBETTS, KENNETH0230496/8/2023 504806 708.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 579.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 644.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 772.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 644.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 4,186.00 837.20 WATER DLVRY SVCS: HARVESTON PARK 3.00BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, DBA READYREFRESH 0013236/8/2023 504807 3.00 2Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 532.00BRIGHTON HILL ACADEMY, SPORTS & LEARNING ACADEMY 0225186/8/2023 504808 532.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBROWN JAMAL DEON, DBA JDB TRAINING 0226706/8/2023 504809 700.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 595.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 840.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 3,395.00 1,260.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBRYANT, ROBERT0229486/8/2023 504810 1,346.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 224.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 392.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 466.20 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 362.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 3,444.00 358.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSBUCHER, BRET PHILLIP0215026/8/2023 504811 910.00 1,890.00TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 980.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: BLDG & SAFETY 295.00CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS, CALBO 0010546/8/2023 504812 295.00 LIGHT BAR INSTALL: COMM DEVELOPMENT CDCE INC0160646/8/2023 504813 5,377.94 5,610.88LIGHT BAR INSTALL: COMM DEVELOPMENT 232.94 DSGN CONSULTANT SVCS: RRSP SKATE PARK 6,176.75COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP, LLC 0044146/8/2023 504814 6,176.75 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSCOX, KRISTI LYN0175426/8/2023 504815 315.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 420.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 308.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 112.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,365.00 210.00 MAINT & REPAIR SECURITY SYS: INFO TECH DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 INC, CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES 0206486/8/2023 504816 790.00 MAINT & REPAIR OF SEC SYSTEM: INFO TECH 6,300.00 RECABLING: CRC: CIP 33,393.41 26,303.41 MAINT & REPAIR: SECURITY SYSTEM: INFO TE DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 INC, CONVERGINT TECHNOLOGIES 0206486/8/2023 504817 970.00 7,228.00MAINT & REPAIR OF SEC SYSTEM: INFO TECH 6,258.00 RESTROOM RENTAL: CITYWIDE CLEANUP DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 0039456/8/2023 504818 125.20 PORTABLE RESTROOM SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 133.21 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: RANCHO VISTA RD 5,278.41 5,020.00 3Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG & SAFETY DOWNS ENERGY FUEL0041926/8/2023 504819 308.52 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 163.09 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT 275.03 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFORCEMENT 25.38 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: EOC 100.83 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 1,207.26 334.41 REIMB: BIKE TO WORK DAY: HR 57.40020921 EMPLOYEE #005396/8/2023 504820 57.40 REIMB: CPRS CONF: TCSD 40.00016436 EMPLOYEE #004946/8/2023 504821 40.00 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIRS: FIRE STA 95 2,162.00GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 0048906/8/2023 504822 2,162.00 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS: PWGRAINGER0037926/8/2023 504823 248.25 617.08MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 368.83 MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 565.00HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL GROUP INC, DBA FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA 0011356/8/2023 504824 565.00 ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 12 96.74IDETAIL SUPPLY CO0220566/8/2023 504825 96.74 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: STREETS: PW 716.41INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS INC0225696/8/2023 504826 716.41 APR ENTERPRISES 911 SVC: INFO TECH 300.00INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC0132866/8/2023 504827 300.00 BUSINESS CARDS: B&S 81.82JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 0218966/8/2023 504828 81.82 REIMB: RFRSHMNTS: TEAM PACE 124.87022824 EMPLOYEE #006306/8/2023 504829 124.87 GEOTECHNICAL SVCS: RRSP: PW22-14 1,500.00LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC0004826/8/2023 504830 1,500.00 APR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 LIEBERT CASSIDY AND WHITMORE 0049056/8/2023 504831 2,160.00 APR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00020 170.00 APR HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00021 13,167.50 10,837.50 TREE SVCS: S-24 HARVESTON SLOPE: PARKS 24,299.62MARIPOSA TREE MANAGEMENT INC 0226646/8/2023 504832 24,299.62 DSGN & ENVIRO SVCS: CONG RELIEF: PW19-02 11,824.57MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY INC 0213706/8/2023 504833 11,824.57 4Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # APR ADA LABOR COMPLIANCE SVCS: PW20-13 1,096.26MDG ASSOCIATES INC0186756/8/2023 504834 1,096.26 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSMICHELLE MEDINA, DBA MICHELLE Q MEDINA 0209076/8/2023 504835 1,116.50 2,594.90TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,478.40 BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARYMIDWEST TAPE LLC0134436/8/2023 504836 152.43 BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY 249.32 BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY 444.26 42.51 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSMIRANDA, JULIO C0122646/8/2023 504837 184.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 218.40 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 924.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,705.20 378.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOCMISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0040436/8/2023 504838 315.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOC 42.99 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 1,336.06 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC 1,924.44 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 72.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR: PW 256.92 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR: PW 61.07 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR: PW 1,027.69 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 5,082.48 45.89 SIGNAGE: WELCOME CTR: TCSDMORAMARCO ANTHONY J, DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 0040406/8/2023 504839 600.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 747.25 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,851.25 504.00 AUTO PARTS & MISC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 12 11.41NAPA AUTO PARTS0029256/8/2023 504840 11.41 MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: FACS: PWNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC0225996/8/2023 504841 10,454.50 17,431.50MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: I-15/79S: PW04-08 6,977.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS: HR 38.00OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 0211216/8/2023 504842 38.00 VEHICLE MAINT: PREVENTION: FIRE 43.88OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE INC 0219986/8/2023 504843 43.88 UNIFORMS: LIFEGUARDS: TCSD 1,044.23ORIGINAL WATERMEN INC0088716/8/2023 504844 1,044.23 5Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PWPRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 0050756/8/2023 504845 81.89 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 82.01 UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW 22.05 UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW 52.44 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 4.62 UNIFORM SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW 52.44 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TCC 14.32 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 4.62 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: THEATER 9.89 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: LIBRARY 19.88 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TVM 12.74 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 367.18 10.28 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTRREFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 0225376/8/2023 504846 12.56 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 73 390.34 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 77.94 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: MPSC 150.00 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE 153.13 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 84 97.84 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 73 936.85 55.04 6Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICESRICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 0024126/8/2023 504847 494.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 11,799.07 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 560.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 118.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 1,258.81 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 782.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 378.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 3,787.65 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 5,113.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 4,197.94 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 541.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 973.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 59.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 1,541.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 88.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 354.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 1,741.49 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 2,219.15 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 2,255.90 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 6,077.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 118.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 14,132.76 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 598.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 6,960.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 41.56 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 738.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 1,888.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 4,705.00 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 73,551.83 29.50 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: THEATER: TCSD SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 0176996/8/2023 504848 1,000.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 250.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SUGARPLUM ZOO: ECO DEV 300.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: ART NIGHT: TCSD 250.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: CULTURE DAY: TCSD 275.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 175.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: THEATER: TCSD 3,600.00 1,350.00 JAZZ @ THE MERC 5/18SHERRY BERRY MUSIC0092136/8/2023 504849 353.50 JAZZ @ THE MERC 5/25 486.50 COMEDY @ THE MERC 5/27 2,472.00 1,632.00 05/08-06/04 SECURITY: ROTATING PARKS 5,005.00SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES INC, DBA BAS SECURITY 0134826/8/2023 504850 5,005.00 7Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # RFRSHMNTS: HUMAN SVCS: TCSDSMART AND FINAL INC0006456/8/2023 504851 477.84 MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 164.20 MISC SUPPLIES: SUMMER FOOD PRGM: TCSD 1,108.60 466.56 MAY SOLAR GENERATION: VARI LOCATIONS 28,078.77SMER RESEARCH 1 LLC0233416/8/2023 504852 28,078.77 APR HOMELESS/STREET OUTREACH: TCSD SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP0205456/8/2023 504853 32,136.40 41,303.07APR BRIDGE HOUSING/CDBG -CV: TCSD 9,166.67 CONSULTING SVCS: MUNIS: FINANCE 370.00SOFTRESOURCES LLC0147836/8/2023 504854 370.00 LEGAL SRVCS: PLANNING 2,085.00TELECOM LAW FIRM PC0213616/8/2023 504855 2,085.00 EMPLOYEE SVC RECOGNITION: HR 95.33TERRYBERRY COMPANY0038496/8/2023 504856 95.33 GRAPHIC DESIGN SVCS: THEATER 2,760.00TIERCE, NICHOLAS0163116/8/2023 504857 2,760.00 TEM NIGHT MARKET SVCS: TCSDTNT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC 0191006/8/2023 504858 10,000.00 DJ/MC SOUND SVCS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD 8,000.00 DJ/MC SOUND SVCS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD 36,500.00 18,500.00 REIMB: TEAM PACE 200.00021549 EMPLOYEE #005346/8/2023 504859 200.00 ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: STA 73 GYM/GARAGE 9,860.00TR DESIGN GROUP INC0213676/8/2023 504860 9,860.00 ERGONOIC SUPPLIES: HR 1,157.19VERSA PRODUCTS INC0226926/8/2023 504861 1,157.19 MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 292.27WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 0018816/8/2023 504862 292.27 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 1,301,734.57 8Page: 06/06/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 9 3:52:22PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks: 68 1,304,056.27 9Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # VARIOUS WATER APRIL BATCH 2 10,326.98RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 0002625/19/2023 14986 10,326.98 VARIOUS WATER APRIL BATCH 3 17,614.15RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 0002625/26/2023 14987 17,614.15 VARIOUS APR SO CAL GAS SVCS 12,411.09SO CALIF GAS COMPANY0012125/24/2023 14990 12,411.09 VARIOUS MAR SOCAL EDISON SVCS 166,062.30SO CALIF EDISON0005375/31/2023 14991 166,062.30 VARIOUS APR/MAY INTERNET SVCS 14,546.10TIME WARNER CABLE0102765/31/2023 14992 14,546.10 JUNE DISH NETWORK: 32121 BUTTERFIELD STG 175.38MOOD MEDIA NORTH AMERICA, HOLDINGS LLC 0229426/2/2023 14993 175.38 JUN DISH NETWORK: 41952 6TH ST 65.18MOOD MEDIA NORTH AMERICA, HOLDINGS LLC 0229426/2/2023 14994 65.18 SUPPORT PAYMENT 138.92CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT 0103496/8/2023 14995 138.92 ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN PAYMENT 384.62I C M A RETIREMENT PLAN 106474 0213016/8/2023 14996 384.62 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 15,171.21NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0010656/8/2023 15000 15,171.21 NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT PAYMENT 427.79NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0190886/8/2023 15001 427.79 OBRA - PROJECT RETIREMENT PAYMENT 6,392.98NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0003896/8/2023 15002 6,392.98 VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,982.68EYEMED VISION CARE0174326/7/2023 15005 1,982.68 04/16-5/15 CELLULAR/BROADBAND:CITYWIDE 13,534.45VERIZON WIRELESS0144866/6/2023 15006 13,534.45 STATE TAX PAYMENT 9,387.12INSTATAX EDD0004446/1/2023 15008 9,387.12 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 3,542.48NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0010656/1/2023 15010 3,542.48 1Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # REPLACEMENT DISHWASHER: FIRE STA 92 1,618.54ACTION APPLIANCE INC, DBA ACTION APPLIANCE 0042296/8/2023 212596 1,618.54 MAY TEMP HELP: FINANCE 2,057.51APPLEONE INC, DBA APPLEONE 0001016/8/2023 212597 2,057.51 REFRESHMENT SVCS: FOC 122.10ARAMARK SERVICES INC, DBA ARAMARK REFRESHMENT 0228886/8/2023 212598 122.10 CEQA ADVISORY CONSULTANT: LR22-0912 1,570.00ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC0216896/8/2023 212599 1,570.00 TEAM HATS: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC 0155926/8/2023 212600 380.25 2,084.43UNIFORM ORDER: MAINTENANCE: PW 1,704.18 FY 22/23 DISCRETIONARY GRANT FUNDS 1,000.00BIRTH CHOICE CENTERS INC, DBA BIRTH CHOICE OF 0057166/8/2023 212601 1,000.00 RIP RAP MATERIALS: VARI CHANNELS: PW CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN MATERIALS CO 0031386/8/2023 212602 3,164.24 3,806.33RIP RAP MATERIALS: VARI CHANNELS: PW 642.09 MAY COPIERS LEASE: LIBRARY 671.56CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES INC 0049716/8/2023 212603 671.56 JUN JANITORIAL SVCS: OTSF POLICE 616.04CCS SAN DIEGO JANITORIAL INC, DBA CCS FACILITY SERVICES 0229306/8/2023 212604 616.04 T-SHIRTS: PUBLIC OUTREACH: PW 788.44CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC, DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS 0164466/8/2023 212605 788.44 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMTCINTAS PROTECTION NO 2, CINTAS FIRE 636525 0054176/8/2023 212606 158.07 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 174.44 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 35.07 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 111.75 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 394.95 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 34.50 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 1,071.59 162.81 REIMB: UNIFORMS: CODE ENFORCEMENT 136.15005410 EMPLOYEE #002126/8/2023 212607 136.15 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNINGCOMPLETE OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA, INC 0231756/8/2023 212608 124.57 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 84 450.39 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING 741.55 166.59 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY 51.04COMPLETE OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA, INC 0231756/8/2023 212609 51.04 2Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # GYM EQUIPMENT: STA 95: FIRE 5,435.17CORE HEALTH AND FITNESS LLC 0232686/8/2023 212610 5,435.17 APR SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION: CODE ENF 592.50CORELOGIC INC, DBA CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS 0119226/8/2023 212611 592.50 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 350.00COSSOU, CELINE0133796/8/2023 212612 350.00 JUN '23 WEB SUBSCRIPTION: ECO DEV 1,296.00COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC 0145216/8/2023 212613 1,296.00 MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD 887.81COSTCO TEMECULA 4910012646/8/2023 212614 887.81 SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 2,189.14COSTCO TEMECULA 4910043296/8/2023 212615 2,189.14 CLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR 681.25CPS HR CONSULTING0170386/8/2023 212616 681.25 PHOTOGRAPHY RIGHTS: FIRE 750.00CREIGH RYAN MCINTYRE, DBA CREIGH PHOTOGRAPHY 0232866/8/2023 212617 750.00 ENG DSGN SVCS: HOCKEY RINK: PW22-06 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC 0126006/8/2023 212618 10,138.25 CONST SUPPORT SVC: RECYCLED WTR RETROFIT 1,890.00 APR DOG PARK RENOVATION: CIP: PW 15,688.25 3,660.00 MAY FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY MGR DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES 0029906/8/2023 212619 5,500.00 11,000.00APR FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY MGR 5,500.00 ROCKER RECLINER: FIRE DEPT 815.63DREAMSEATS LLC0232746/8/2023 212620 815.63 ADD'L LASERFICHE LICENSES: CITY CLERK 10,311.00E C S IMAGING INC0047996/8/2023 212621 10,311.00 VISION PLAN COBRA PAYMENT 35.42EYEMED VISION CARE0174326/8/2023 212622 35.42 EXPRESS MAIN SVCS: TCSD 22.43FEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/8/2023 212623 22.43 SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00FRANCHISE TAX BOARD0029826/8/2023 212624 50.00 REPLACEMENT B/W DESKTOP PRINTERS: I T 2,732.89GOVCONNECTION INC0197216/8/2023 212625 2,732.89 3Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # REGIST: BUDGET DOC BASICS: FINANCE 210.00GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS, ASSOCIATION GFOA 0001756/8/2023 212626 210.00 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCMHANKS HARDWARE INC0001866/8/2023 212627 107.92 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 3,450.93 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 152.24 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI FACS 3,939.87 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 129.25 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 194.96 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 228.18 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: FOC 120.69 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 863.07 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY 222.22 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TRAFFIC: PW 108.34 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC 246.11 MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 1,343.74 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 28.25 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 284.83 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 1,574.45 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM 13,078.00 82.95 VIDEOGRAPHY SVCS: CITY MGR 900.00HESS, JOHN PAUL0133216/8/2023 212628 900.00 APR-JUN SALES TAX & RECOVERY SVCS 5,282.99HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC 0010136/8/2023 212629 5,282.99 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: PARKS: PWHOME DEPOT0031986/8/2023 212630 98.05 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 29.35 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 426.35 298.95 HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 95.16JAVIER I GONZALEZ, DBA J QUALITY CONTROLS 0232106/8/2023 212631 95.16 TRAINING VIDEO: EMERGENCY MGMT: FIRE JDS VIDEO AND MEDIA, PRODUCTIONS INC 0233426/8/2023 212632 2,800.00 6,400.00TRAINING VIDEO: EMERGENCY MGMT: FIRE 3,600.00 ON CALL CONSULTANT SVCS: PLANNING 2,007.50KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 0010916/8/2023 212633 2,007.50 TEM GRANT PRGM: COMM REINVESTMENT 10,000.00LORY, SUSAN0068976/8/2023 212634 10,000.00 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA ATHACO INC 0037826/8/2023 212635 2,097.78 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 344.37 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 2,801.07 VARI SIGNS & SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 7,207.93 1,964.71 4Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # DENTAL COBRA PAYMENTMET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 0030766/8/2023 212636 419.14 DENTAL COBRA PAYMENT 256.76 DENTAL PAYMENT 15,212.13 14,536.23 FY 22/23 DISCRETIONARY GRANT FUNDS 1,000.00MICHELLES PLACE CANCER, RESOURCE CENTER 0056906/8/2023 212637 1,000.00 OFFICE FURNITURE: CRCNATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE, LLC 0217856/8/2023 212638 1,429.81 7,788.76OFFICE FURNITURE: CRC 6,358.95 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF OLD TOWN WISE RIDERS INC, OLD TOWN TEMECULA 0231556/8/2023 212639 51.34 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 988.91 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 1,165.92 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 56.21 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 1,511.64 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 571.06 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 497.72 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 431.61 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 297.80 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 1,058.49 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 1,031.65 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 988.91 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 1,840.89 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 335.33 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 674.38 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 413.22 VEH REPAIR & MAINTENANCE: TEM SHERIFF 12,315.24 400.16 MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD 185.61PENWORTHY COMPANY THE0134186/8/2023 212640 185.61 REIMB: TYLER CONNECT CONF: INFO TECH 1,095.10022784 EMPLOYEE #006116/8/2023 212641 1,095.10 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION: PW 710.41PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 0002546/8/2023 212642 710.41 CONSULTANT SVCS: HR 14,430.00RAMOS HR CONSULTING INC0232546/8/2023 212643 14,430.00 EXP MAIL DLVY SVCS: HR 90.00RANCHO RUNNERS INC0225016/8/2023 212644 90.00 MAY SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING: CLASSES 1,540.00RISE INTERPRETING INC0173916/8/2023 212645 1,540.00 5Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # RENEW PERMIT: FIRE STA 95 1,317.00RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 0013656/8/2023 212646 1,317.00 ADD'L DEP REQ: MURRIETA CRK CHANNEL: CIP 5,000.00RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD CONTROL AND, WATER CONSERVATION DIST 0004116/8/2023 212647 5,000.00 APR EMERG RADIO RENTALS: CODE ENF RIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION 0227156/8/2023 212648 388.35 776.70MAY EMERG RADIO RENTALS: CODE ENF 388.35 STREET MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC0010976/8/2023 212649 490.66 5,954.22TRAFFIC PAINT: STREET MAINT: PW 5,463.56 COUNTRY LIVE! @ THE MERC 540.00SANBORN GWYNETH A, CO TEMECULA MUSIC ACADEMY 0099806/8/2023 212650 540.00 DSGN, ENVIRO & SURVEY SVS: RRSP TRAILS 5,476.25SB&O INC0213096/8/2023 212651 5,476.25 REIMB: EIT TESTING & CERTIFICATION 1,408.31023387 EMPLOYEE #006426/8/2023 212652 1,408.31 PEST CONTROL SVCS: STA 95SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 0005196/8/2023 212653 80.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 36.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: THEATER 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: TCC 123.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: STA 92 42.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: STA 73 68.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CIVIC CTR 559.00 120.00 JUN GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,0978,0979 529.63SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, TELEPHONE COMPANY 0126526/8/2023 212654 529.63 FY 22/23 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING 5,000.00SOUTHWEST WOMENS CHORUS 0093796/8/2023 212655 5,000.00 BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 11,471.19STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 0077626/8/2023 212656 11,471.19 VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 1,766.63STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 0127236/8/2023 212657 1,766.63 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE 117.18STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT0083376/8/2023 212658 117.18 MISC MERCHANDISE: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD 1,284.70STEIN ANDREW, DBA PARKINK0156486/8/2023 212659 1,284.70 6Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PWTEMECULA WINNELSON COMPANY 0039416/8/2023 212660 53.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 134.31 PLUMBING SUPPLIES: CITY HALL 492.62 304.46 MUNIS MIGRATION SVCS: FINANCETYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC0001616/8/2023 212661 1,400.00 MUSIS MIGRATION SVCS: FINANCE 1,400.00 MUNIS MIGRATION SVCS: FINANCE 100.00 MUNIS MIGRATION SVCS: FINANCE 1,400.00 MUNIS MIGRATION SVCS: FINANCE 7,800.00 3,500.00 CONSULTING SVCS: PLANNING 21,500.00TYSON, LAUREN C0231606/8/2023 212662 21,500.00 TVE2 LEASE REIMBURSEMENT 200.00VAN DER LEE, REINIERUS H0233806/8/2023 212663 200.00 FY 22/23 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING 5,000.00VETERANS SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT, NETWORK 0187076/8/2023 212664 5,000.00 VIDEOGRAPHY SVCS: SOTC 4,883.40VISIONARIES IMAGE CO LLC0210106/8/2023 212665 4,883.40 BAY DOOR REPAIR: FIRE STA 84 751.26VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC0018906/8/2023 212666 751.26 PARAMEDIC SUPPLIES: FIRE 5,483.18ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION, GPO 0037766/8/2023 212667 5,483.18 Grand total for UNION BANK: 528,622.65 7Page: 06/08/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 2:58:41PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks: 88 528,622.65 8Page: 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A - JUNE 13, 2023 - JUNE 26, 2023 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager’s Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 9,677,019.92. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 06/13/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,117,545.66 06/15/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 879,896.67 06/20/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 381,604.45 06/22/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 6,387,740.09 06/26/2023 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 141,487.45 06/22/2023 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 768,745.60 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 07/11/2023 COUNCIL MEETING: 9,677,019.92$ CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS 001 GENERAL FUND 6,588,982.13 110 COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT 30,319.32 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 10,084.98 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 10,122.51 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 369,131.69 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 2,008.46 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 18,264.33 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 48,987.40 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,495,309.33 300 INSURANCE FUND 7,941.43 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 6,345.63 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 74,860.71 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 74,431.19 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 5,405.18 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 25,077.01 335 SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT FUND 6,157.43 340 FACILITIES 35,726.63 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 2,657.44 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,493.50 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 3,093.94 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 300.42 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,545.00 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 772.50 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 515.00 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 5,768.00 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 77.25 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 257.50 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 64.38 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 4,196.45 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 1,916.19 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 463.50 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 412.00 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 4,218.50 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 72.95 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 3,914.00 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 3,462.70 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 11,065.00 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 13,450.64 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 167.38 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 346.41 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 9,047.38 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 1,802.50 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 64.36 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 257.50 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 14,476.57 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 103.00 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 13,137.00 8,908,274.32$ DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: PAYROLL 001 GENERAL FUND 430,835.62 110 COVID-19 PANDEMIC COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT 1,082.48 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 759.62 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2,909.33 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 253,019.15 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,540.30 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 209.18 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 4,219.57 300 INSURANCE FUND 4,003.42 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 4,003.32 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 51,407.41 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,109.38 340 FACILITIES 9,646.82 768,745.60$ TOTAL BY FUND:9,677,019.92$ 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15011 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA QUERY: DOT: HRFMCSA D&A CLEARINGHOUSE022515 25.00 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: WELLNESSGIFTCARDS.COM021482 536.35 REGIST: LEAVE OF ABSENCE TRAINING: HR EVENTBRITE.COM015626 28.52 EXECUTIVE RETREAT '23: DEPOSIT: HR THE MISSION INN023383 2,500.00 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HRWESTLAKE VILLAGE INN023384 1,119.69 RFRSHMNTS: CALPERS SEMINAR: HRSTATER BROTHERS MARKETS008023 75.00 REGIST: STAFF TRAINING: HRCPS HR CONSULTING017038 150.00 EXECUTIVE RETREAT '23: HRPREDICTIVE INDEX LLC023289 3,500.75 RFRSHMNTS: CALPERS SEMINAR: HRSTATER BROTHERS MARKETS008023 25.83 TRANSCRIPTION SVCS: HRREV.COM022444 37.50 REGIST: EEOC TRAINING: HRPAY.GOV017371 145.00 SUNSHINE FUNDWES FLOWERS008668 96.55 SUNSHINE FUND 8,342.18WES FLOWERS008668 101.99 1Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15012 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN: TCSDRIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 453.00 HEALTH PERMIT: ROD RUN: TCSDRIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 10.74 HEALTH PERMIT: EXPO: TCSDRIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 207.00 HEALTH PERMIT: EXPO: TCSDRIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 4.91 HEALTH PERMIT: CULTURE FEST: TCSD RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 575.00 HEALTH PERMIT: CULTURE FEST: TCSD RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 001365 13.63 REGIST: SENIOR EXCURSION: TCSDSAN DIEGO COUNTY FAIR, REGISTRATION 021260 405.00 ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: TCSDPRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 000254 18.00 RFRSHMNTS: ROD RUN: TCSDPIZZA FACTORY023164 561.24 REGIST: DAY CAMP EXCURSION: TCSDREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY CA, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 010885 2,159.60 SUBSCRIPTION: PROMO IMAGES: TCSD ISTOCK INTL INC012085 120.00 RFRSHMNTS: RIBBON CUTTING EVENT: TCSD MEMORABLE BITES LLC, DBA FIREHOUSE SUBS 018925 287.06 LAUNDRY SVCS: TABLE CLOTHS: TCSD LAUND3R.COM LLC020249 94.35 MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION: TCSDCANVA.COM020792 12.99 VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO TRANSACTION: TCSD PAYPAL006952 198.20 MONTHLY SVC CHARGE: TEEN ROOM: CRC NETFLIX.COM020886 9.99 CANVAS PICTURES: TCSDEASYCANVASPRINTS.COM023023 77.83 FOOD HANDLERS TRAINING: TCSD 5,541.54STATEFOODSAFETY.COM017201 333.00 2Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15013 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA FLOWERS: KENT HINTERGARDT MEMORIAL: FIRE WES FLOWERS008668 141.36 RFRSHMNTS: HONOR GUARD MTG: FIRE PANERA BREAD008956 38.07 RFRSHMNTS: HONOR GUARD MTG: FIRE PANERA BREAD008956 253.18 RFRSHMNTS: EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION: FIRE TEMECULA OLIVE OIL COMPANY 010061 133.06 STAFF UNIFORMS: FIRECARHARTT WIP023368 217.26 EQUIPMENT CASE: FIREPELICAN PRODUCTS023370 163.07 CONDOLENCE FLOWERS: FIRECOSTCO TEMECULA 491001264 59.80 RFRSHMNTS: BATTALION CHIEF MTG: FIRE MARGARITAS COCINA Y CANTINA 022802 111.41 SMALL TOOL & EQUIP: FIREALL HANDS FIRE EQUIPMENT023371 26.99 REGIST: '23 CONFERENCE: FIRECALIFORNIA FIRE EMS & DISASTER, CONFERENCE 023372 450.00 REGIST: '23 CONFERENCE: FIRECALIFORNIA FIRE EMS & DISASTER, CONFERENCE 023372 710.00 REGIST: '23 CONFERENCE: FIRECALIFORNIA FIRE EMS & DISASTER, CONFERENCE 023372 710.00 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: TIC GEAR: FIRE MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC 021860 45.00 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: ENG 12: FIREMOTIS FIRE RESCUE023373 30.99 RFRSHMNTS: ROD RUN: FIREPRIMOS MEXICAN FOOD023374 221.60 ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: FIRE DEPTAPPLE STORE013338 0.99 RFRSHMNTS: ROD RUN: FIREMEMORABLE BITES LLC, DBA FIREHOUSE SUBS 018925 361.89 RFRSHMNTS: HONOR GUARD MTG: FIRE VONS008669 53.04 RFRSHMNTS: HONOR GUARD MTG: FIRE VONS008669 198.95 RFRSHMNTS: HONOR GUARD MTG: FIRE 3,943.58VONS00866916.92 3Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15015 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNL MTGHYDERABAD CAFE INDIAN CUISINE 023389 261.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: CITY CLERKINTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL, CLERKS 000501 125.00 RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNL MTGPEONY CHINESE CUISINE006117 247.15 ONLINE SUBSCRIPTIN: CITY CLERKPRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 000254 14.00 MISC SUPPLIES: CITY EVENT: CITY CLERK COSTCO TEMECULA 491001264 40.86 LODGING: CITY LEADERS SUMMIT: CITY CLERK 1,187.65HYATT001060499.64 Grand total for UNION BANK:19,014.95 4Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # BACKFLOW TESTING: VARI MEDIANSALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE SEMAN 0130156/15/2023504863 54.00 BACKFLOW TESTING: VARI LOCATIO 270.00 BACKFLOW TESTING: VARI LOCATIO 378.0054.00 MISC SUPPLIES: CITY EVENTS: TCSDAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 0072826/15/2023504864 842.41 MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD 578.53 MISC SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 521.99 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSD 102.20 MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVS: TCSD 488.33 MISC FILM SUPPLIES: TCSD 177.09 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIR 253.20 MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 452.08 MISC SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE 468.70 MISC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIRE DE 61.94 MISC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY 37.78 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS -9.39 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION:67.74 REC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 597.66 MISC BOOKS: RHRTPL: TCSD -14.67 MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD 34.76 MISC. OFC SUPPLIES: EM: FIRE DEP 813.63 MISC SUPPLIES: SPORTS: TCSD 10,798.615,324.63 MISC GRAPHIC DSGN SVCS: TEM NEWSLETTER ANN M HOWELL, DBA ANN HOWELL DESIGN 0206916/15/2023504865 3,200.00 3,795.00MISC GRAPHIC DSGN SVCS: SOTC 595.00 ELECTRICAL MAINT SVCS: DUCK POND AYERS ELECTRIC INC0214006/15/2023504866 300.00 ELECTRICAL MAINT SVCS: HARVEST 100.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: STA 12 200.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: PAT BIRDSAL 2,800.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 3,700.00300.00 MAY RESTROOM MAINT: PARKS: PW 9,098.22AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC0189416/15/2023504867 9,098.22 WATER DLVRY SVCS: TVE2 19.13BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, DBA READYREFRESH 0013236/15/2023504868 19.13 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 176.47DANS FEED AND SEED INC0012336/15/2023504869 176.47 5Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PORTABLE RESTROOMS: RIVERTON PARK DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 0039456/15/2023504870 146.88 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: VETERAN 146.88 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: VAIL RANC 214.88 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: RRSP 175.00 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: LONG CAN 146.88 PRICE CORRECTION: LONG CANYO -36.00 PRICE CORRECTION: RIVERTON PA -36.00 PRICE CORRECTION: VETERANS PA -36.00 PRICE CORRECTION: VAIL RANCH P 673.52-49.00 APR WTR QUALITY MAINT: DUCK POND/HARV 7,430.00DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES INC 0197206/15/2023504871 7,430.00 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT: PW DOWNS ENERGY FUEL0041926/15/2023504872 1,841.77 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DE 125.57 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE EN 218.54 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC 298.14 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW 209.01 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS 1,421.40 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INS 374.59 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEP 4,759.35270.33 CONSTRUCTION MGT SVCS: MPSC: PW20-13 19,800.00DUDEK0122176/15/2023504873 19,800.00 REIMB: ICSC CONFERENCE: ECO DEV 234.20022646 EMPLOYEE #006056/15/2023504874 234.20 MAY '23 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: WC 1,250.00ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT INC 0180986/15/2023504875 1,250.00 I-15/FV PKWY IMPROVEMENTS: PH II: CIP 743,812.79FLATIRON WEST INC0148196/15/2023504876 743,812.79 REIMB: CCWC CONF: 06/07-06/10/23 245.07022526 EMPLOYEE #005946/15/2023504877 245.07 SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF 1,200.00FORENSIC NURSES OF SOCAL INC 0227266/15/2023504878 1,200.00 MISC EQUIPMENT: CAP: POLICE 32.18GALLS LLC0019376/15/2023504879 32.18 REIMB: TEAM PACE022865 EMPLOYEE #005716/15/2023504880 91.94 296.66REIMB: TEAM PACE 204.72 ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: STA 84: PW19-14 740.00GILLIS & PANICHAPAN ARCHITECTS, INC 0213086/15/2023504881 740.00 6Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # REIMB: UNIFORMS: CODE ENFORCEMENT 94.53011898 EMPLOYEE #004596/15/2023504882 94.53 PLOTTER & COPIER SUPPLIES:CENTRAL SVCS INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 0069146/15/2023504883 2,332.69 3,899.78PLOTTER & COPIER SUPPLIES:CENT 1,567.09 MATL'S TESTING SVCS: CRC RENO: PW19-17 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC0004826/15/2023504884 3,301.92 9,356.22EMERGENCY GEOTECH SVCS: RAIN 6,054.30 WELDING SVCS: FIRE STA 95 2,155.00MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING INC 0049516/15/2023504885 2,155.00 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATER 19.54MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0040436/15/2023504886 19.54 7Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: MEDIANS: PW NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC0225996/15/2023504888 20,836.90 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 243.57 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VINTAGE HILL 247.75 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: MEADOWS PA 201.01 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 74.41 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 460.78 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 292.99 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 319.60 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 276.21 MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: SLOPES: P 60,309.58 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 348.95 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 452.45 TREE PLANTING: MURRIETA CRK TR 3,780.00 TREE PLANTING: TEMECULA PKWY 6,600.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 174.08 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKING GAR 354.79 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RANCHO HIG 443.84 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: REDHAWK ME 301.39 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS: CROWNHILL 8,640.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 326.34 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 880.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 880.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 70.30 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 73.15 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 163.16 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 1,525.96 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 642.84 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 254.41 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 347.42 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 166.39 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 114.17 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 113.63 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 113.63 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 650.00 LDSCP IMPROVEMENTS: HARVESTO 1,545.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI LOCATIO 322.25 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 212.42 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 336.72 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 136.14 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VINTAGE HILL 316.70 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 225.39 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 114,365.36591.04 FEB PROJ MGMT SVCS: MRC: PW17-21NV5 INC0093376/15/2023504889 34,485.60 63,502.80APR PROJ MGMT SVCS: MRC: PW17 29,017.20 8Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 9 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # VEHICLE REPAIRS/MAINT: STREETS: PW OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE INC 0219986/15/2023504890 199.14 VEHICE REPAIRS: FACILITIES 148.31 BUS SVCS: MPSC: TCSD 840.23 VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: STREETS 1,116.54 VEHICLE MAINT: FIRE DEPT 4,507.372,203.15 MAY PLAN REVIEW SVCS: FIRE PREVPRO ACTIVE FIRE DESIGN AND, CONSULTING 0129046/15/2023504891 14,824.00 28,286.70APR PLAN REVIEW SVCS: FIRE PRE 13,462.70 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PWPRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY0050756/15/2023504892 63.69 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 4.62 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: MPS 24.52 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TVM 12.74 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TCC 14.32 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 63.69 UNIFORM SVCS: STREETS: PW 19.74 UNIFORM SVCS: STREETS: PW 52.44 UNIFORM SVCS: PARK MAINT: PW 4.62 UNIFORM SVCS: STREETS: PW 52.44 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: THE 9.89 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: LIBR 342.5919.88 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTRREFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 0225376/15/2023504893 369.96 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: TVE2 598.13 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CHILDRENS 598.13 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: THEATER 598.13 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: JRC 2,511.40347.05 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICESRICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 0024126/15/2023504894 1,917.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 383.50 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 2,695.45 APR 2023 LEGAL SERVICES 5,024.9528.50 REIMB: UNIFORMS: CODE ENFORCEMENT 140.68504895 6/15/2023 005585 EMPLOYEE #00352 140.68 LOCKSMITH SVCS: TVE2: PW 345.00SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 0042746/15/2023504896 345.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SUNMIST/BERRY: ECO DEV SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 0176996/15/2023504897 300.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: FESTIVAL: C 300.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: COUNCIL MT 225.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: REDI COMMI 1,100.00275.00 JAZZ @ THE MERC 6/1 332.50SHERRY BERRY MUSIC0092136/15/2023504898 332.50 9Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 10 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UPSINGH GROUP INC0220516/15/2023504899 7,202.00 14,379.00HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-U 7,177.00 EMPLOYEE SERVICE RECOGNITION: HR TERRYBERRY COMPANY0038496/15/2023504900 128.61 281.89EMPLOYEE SERVICE RECOGNITION 153.28 DJ/MC SOUND DEPOSIT: JULY 4TH: TCSD 4,988.00TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC0006686/15/2023504901 4,988.00 APR-JUN ELEVATOR MAINT SVCS: CITY FACS 5,824.20TK ELEVATOR CORPORATION0174156/15/2023504902 5,824.20 JUN CONSULTING SVCS: CITY CLERK 6,000.00TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS INC 0215806/15/2023504903 6,000.00 PUBLICATION: BANNER COLUMN: CITY MGR 350.00VILLAGE NEWS INC0091946/15/2023504904 350.00 APR CONST MGMT SVCS: CRC: PW19-07 17,734.00WALLACE & ASSOC CONSULTING LLC, ANSER ADVISORY MNGMT LLC 0202756/15/2023504905 17,734.00 ENG PLAN CHECK & REVIEW: LAND DEV 4,550.00WINCHAK KRIS R, DBA K R W & ASSOCIATES 0008206/15/2023504906 4,550.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK:1,098,530.71 10Page: 06/13/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 11 2:04:16PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:47 1,117,545.66 11Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15016 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA PARKING: TYLER CONNECT CONF: LAND DEV SAN DIEGO AIRPORT PARKING015496 200.00 KENT HINTERGARDT MEMORIAL: CITY MGR 1800FLOWERS.COM017091 408.86 KENT HINTERGARDT MEMORIAL: CITY MGR 1800FLOWERS.COM017091 -408.86 LODGING: TYLER CONNECT CONF: LAND DEV LA QUINTA INN007087 847.56 LODGING: TYLER CONNECT CONF: LAND DEV LA QUINTA INN007087 847.56 LICENCE RENEWAL: CIVIL ENGINEER: PW CALIF BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL, ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS 022672 180.00 REFUND: REGIST: TYLER CONNECT CONF: PW 976.12TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC000161 -1,099.00 15017 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE RETREAT '23: HRTHE MISSION INN023383 2,534.87 RFRSHMNTS: TVE2 WORKSHOP: ECO DEV URBANE CAFE, TGH ENTERPRISES LLC 019793 209.78 AIRFARE: SOCIAL MEDIA CONF: ECO DEV JET BLUE022772 60.00 ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: SOCIAL MEDA: ECON APPLE STORE013338 9.99 EXECUTIVE RETREAT '23: HR 2,473.55THE MISSION INN023383 -341.09 15018 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA RFRSHMNTS: HOMESLESS OUTREACHCAMPINIS ITALIAN DELI010514 130.95 RFRSHMNTS: HOMELESS OUTREACHCAMPINIS ITALIAN DELI010514 11.42 RFRSHMNTS: HOMELESS OUTREACHRENE'S COWGIRL CANTINA021614 114.91 TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACHUBER022560 80.91 TRANSP: HOMELESS OUTREACHUBER022560 50.66 RFRSHMNTS: HOMELESS OUTREACH MTG 642.44BJS RESTAURANTS INC009612 253.59 15019 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATION: EOCCALIF SPECIALIZED TRAINING, INSTITUTE 023375 81.56 UNIFORMS: EOC 354.502 HOT UNIFORMS INC004594 272.94 1Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15020 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA TOLL ROADS USAGE: ECO DEVFOOTHILL EASTERN TRANSPORTN., CORRIDOR AGNCY (TOLL RDS) 003633 16.30 VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO TRANSACTION: FIN 41.30PAYPAL00695225.00 15021 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: CITY CNL 2.99APPLE STORE013338 2.99 15022 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA PARKING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING LOT 006942 45.00 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL TEQUILA MUSEO MAYAHUEL022746 48.99 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITITES CONF: CITY CNL CAMELLIA COFFEE ROAST023404 21.86 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL MANGO TACO023243 16.15 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLSACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRAIN 023402 5.00 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL CAFETERIA 15L, DBA: WOK IN THE PARK 020343 33.59 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL SAUCED BBQ & SPIRITS023403 32.82 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL STARBUCKS CORPORATION009720 12.24 PARKING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING LOT 006942 45.00 LODGING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL 760.29HYATT001060499.64 15023 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL TEQUILA MUSEO MAYAHUEL022746 24.46 PARKING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING LOT 006942 42.00 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLUBER022560 24.13 LODGING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLHYATT001060 249.82 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLUBER022560 25.91 REGIST: ICSC MEMBERSHIP/CONF: CITY CNL INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING, CENTERS INC 000198 1,100.00 AIRFARE: ICSC CONF: CITY CNLSOUTHWEST AIRLINES006937 273.98 AIRFARE: ICSC CONF: CITY CNL 1,959.28SOUTHWEST AIRLINES006937 218.98 2Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # 15024 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR HYATT001060 29.01 RFRSHMNTS: APPEAL HEARING: CITY CNL GOAT & VINE THE018323 116.90 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR CAFETERIA 15L, DBA: WOK IN THE PARK 020343 23.32 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR TEQUILA MUSEO MAYAHUEL022746 26.89 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR LA BOU BAKERY & CAFE023409 12.14 PHOTO BOOTH RENTAL: SOTC: CITY MGR THE PHOTOBOOTH GUY022881 100.00 PROMOTIONAL VIDEO PROP: CITY CNLRICHIES REAL AMERICAN DINER 006759 28.22 LODGING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR SHERATON HOTEL006714 521.03 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR BURGERS & BREW023411 15.38 PARKING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGRONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING LOT 006942 63.00 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY MGR 967.91LYFT02095332.02 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE2 HOT UNIFORMS INC0045946/15/2023212668 372.45 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE 332.21 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE 178.13 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE 332.21 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE 324.60 UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE 1,728.80189.20 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM: HR 1,797.80AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH LLC, DBA AETNA RESOURCES 0015176/15/2023212669 1,797.80 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 676.79ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT0039516/15/2023212670 676.79 FY 22/23 COMMUNITY SVC FUNDING 10,000.00AMERICAN ROSE SOCIETY, DBA TEMECULA VALLEY 0030746/15/2023212671 10,000.00 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 191.45ANDREWS, JEFFREY0233956/15/2023212672 191.45 STAFF UNIFORMS: CLASSES: TCSD 376.82BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC 0155926/15/2023212673 376.82 TEM GRANT PRGM: COMM REINVESTMENT 10,000.00BILINGUAL DICTIONARIES INC0233906/15/2023212674 10,000.00 3Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # FIELD EQUIPMENT: SPORTS: TCSD 4,742.46BSN SPORTS LLC0003196/15/2023212675 4,742.46 LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: PW19-09: PWCALIF NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 0218516/15/2023212676 3,368.01 3,684.79LEGAL PUBLICATIONS: CITY CLERK 316.78 janitorial svcs at mall substation: tem 814.77COMMERCIAL CLEANING BY ROGERS, SERVICEMASTER COMMERCIAL 0231586/15/2023212677 814.77 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: SPORTS: TCSD 1,175.96COMPLETE OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA, INC 0231756/15/2023212678 1,175.96 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PWCONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 0029456/15/2023212679 408.63 501.02ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 92.39 MISC SUPPLIES: WORKFORCE PRGMS: TCSD 404.06COSTCO TEMECULA 4910043296/15/2023212680 404.06 PAVEMENT REHAB PRGM: CIP: PW 123,018.00COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, TLMA ADMINISTRATION 0233886/15/2023212681 123,018.00 COMPUTER PURCHASE PROGRAM 1,310.07021796 EMPLOYEE #005536/15/2023212682 1,310.07 EMERGENCY REPAIR: RAINBOW CANYON RD 870.00ELLIS EQUIPMENT INC0232766/15/2023212683 870.00 CNSTCTN MGMT SVCS: I-15/FVP IMPROV PH II FALCON ENGINEERING SERVICES 0194696/15/2023212684 309,535.42 339,565.42CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: PW08 30,030.00 CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: PW08-04 57,233.02FALCON ENGINEERING SERVICES 0194696/15/2023212685 57,233.02 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: TCSD 94.25FEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/15/2023212686 94.25 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: TRAFFICFEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/15/2023212687 49.95 60.13EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: TCSD 10.18 GYM MEMBERSHIP: FIRE STA 84 500.00FITNESS 19 TEMECULA 302 LLC 0225416/15/2023212688 500.00 FIREWORKS DISPLAY: SPEC EVENTS: TCSD 20,750.00GARDEN STATE FIREWORKS INC 0178666/15/2023212689 20,750.00 COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: INFO TECH GOVCONNECTION INC0197216/15/2023212690 1,769.27 1,814.40COMPUTER LOAN PURCHASES: INF 45.13 4Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # code blue 911 VoIP call boxes:CRC & MRC 5,405.18GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 0001806/15/2023212691 5,405.18 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 365.10HEPHNER, JOSHUA0233996/15/2023212692 365.10 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 168.57HERNANDEZ, CELLINA0233966/15/2023212693 168.57 MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTRHOME DEPOT0031986/15/2023212694 1,146.38 1,378.60small tools: tem sheriff 232.22 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT: SR ASSIST PRGM 1,681.80HOSPICE OF THE VALLEYS SC0110496/15/2023212695 1,681.80 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW 1,028.05INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS INC0225696/15/2023212696 1,028.05 FSA & COBRA ADMIN FEES: HRINTERFLEX PAYMENT LLC0231506/15/2023212697 421.25 1,031.00FSA & COBRA ADMIN FEES: HR 609.75 REGIST: TRAINING CLASS: FIRE 450.00INTL CODE COUNCIL0032966/15/2023212698 450.00 TRAINING VIDEO: EMERGENCY MGMT: FIRE 1,525.00JDS VIDEO AND MEDIA, PRODUCTIONS INC 0233426/15/2023212699 1,525.00 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES:CENTRAL SVCS KELLY SPICERS INC, DBA KELLY SPICERS STORES 0162576/15/2023212700 429.24 1,224.64MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL S 795.40 MISC PARTS/SUPPLIES: AQUATICSKNORR SYSTEMS INC0012826/15/2023212701 1,881.64 2,186.41MISC PARTS/SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 304.77 NAME BADGES: ECO DEV 8.70KRACH BREE B, DBA TEMECULA TROPHY & DES 0171186/15/2023212702 8.70 REIMB: CAL CITIES CITY MGR CONF 562.46014796 EMPLOYEE #004436/15/2023212703 562.46 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 257.70LUCAS, CARLOS0234016/15/2023212704 257.70 MISC RENTALS: SPEC EVENTS: TCSD 2,240.00M AND J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC, DBA JOLLY JUMPS 0048136/15/2023212705 2,240.00 REIMB: CLASS: ICI TECH INVESTIGATIONS 364.87MARQUEZ, JOSEPH0122696/15/2023212706 364.87 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 165.15MITCHELL, GORDON0234006/15/2023212707 165.15 5Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # REIMB: RFRSHMNTS: RIV CNTY FLOOD CNTRL 84.05021969 EMPLOYEE #005406/15/2023212708 84.05 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCEOFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV 0039646/15/2023212709 102.71 200.28MISC OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW 97.57 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 259.14PEREZ, MICHAEL0233976/15/2023212710 259.14 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 311.84PETTY CASH0002496/15/2023212711 311.84 POOLS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PARKS 1,606.29POOL AND ELECTRICAL, PRODUCTS INC 0103386/15/2023212712 1,606.29 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE VACTRON: STREET MAINT 74,860.71R D O EQUIPMENT COMPANY0020126/15/2023212713 74,860.71 RENEW PERMIT: THEATER 572.00RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 0013656/15/2023212714 572.00 ADD'L DEPOSIT: MURRIETA CRK: PW21-13 1,000.00RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD CONTROL AND, WATER CONSERVATION DIST 0004116/15/2023212715 1,000.00 MAY EMERG RADIO RENTALS: POLICERIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION 0227156/15/2023212716 1,893.31 1,970.98MAY EMERG RADIO RENTALS: EOC 77.67 ENG SURVEY SVCS: RAINBOW CANYON RD SB&O INC0213096/15/2023212717 28,323.00 DESIGN, ENVIRO & SURVEY SVS: RR 380.00 DESIGN, ENVIRO & SURVEY SVS: RR 29,040.60337.60 DOCUMENT SHRED SVCS: POLICE 7.76SHRED IT US JV LLC, DBA SHRED IT USA LLC 0136956/15/2023212718 7.76 PEST CONTROL SVCS: TVE2SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 0005196/15/2023212719 56.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: TES POOL 59.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: JRC 74.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WEST WING 40.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: MARG SPLAS 49.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: DUCK POND 49.00 EMERG PEST CONTROL SVCS: MAR 421.0094.00 6Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSDSTAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT0083376/15/2023212720 109.70 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 125.67 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL:TCSD 70.83 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 30.62 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL:TCSD 25.34 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 2,419.17 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MALL STOREF 34.56 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 40.48 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 25.01 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: THEATER 261.17 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 58.61 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MALL STOREF 238.03 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CLASSES: TCS 445.86 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 171.37 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD -52.98 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CIP: PW 10.93 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: NPDES: PW 142.02 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: OTSF 162.73 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CIP: PW 4,789.84470.72 ASPAHLT: IC RELEASE: STREETS MAINT: PW 1,035.17STAR PRODUCTS LLC0211206/15/2023212721 1,035.17 NOTICE OF DEPOSIT: CVSW2303954 GARCIA 59,600.00STATE TREASURERS OFFICE0227176/15/2023212722 59,600.00 NOTICE OF DEPOSIT: CVSW2303952 SINGH 40,400.00STATE TREASURERS OFFICE0227176/15/2023212723 40,400.00 GIFT SHOP MERCH: TVM: TCSD 475.32STICKERS BY SANDSTONE0231046/15/2023212724 475.32 ENG & CONSULT SVCS: FVP PH IIT Y LIN INTERNATIONAL0035996/15/2023212725 3,995.32 43,899.17ENG & CONSULT SVCS: FVP PH II 39,903.85 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 179.95TAGGART, COLLEEN0233986/15/2023212726 179.95 MISC PACKING SUPPLIES: SUPPORT SVCS 1,872.61ULINE INC0116596/15/2023212727 1,872.61 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 295.43VALADEZ, ALFONSO0232296/15/2023212728 295.43 REIMB: GANG CONFERENCE: 05/30-06/02 264.48VALTIERRA, ADOLFO0193476/15/2023212729 264.48 7Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # CHALLENGE COINS: EOCWERLE TIMOTHY J, DBA CAMPAIGN FIRE COINS 0225296/15/2023212730 1,430.00 2,405.00CHALLENGE COINS: FIRE DEPT 975.00 MAY CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION: TEM SHERIFF 1,053.45WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, DBA THOMSON REUTERS 0003396/15/2023212731 1,053.45 05/07-06/06 FUEL USAGE: POLICE 2,979.02WEX BANK0211486/15/2023212732 2,979.02 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PWWHITE CAP LP0201936/15/2023212733 686.58 780.96MISC SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 94.38 Grand total for UNION BANK:879,896.67 8Page: 06/15/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 9 1:11:07PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:75 879,896.67 9Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # ANTENNA INSTALLATION: CHIEF: FIRE 1,158.85AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, ENTERPRISES 0225466/22/2023504907 1,158.85 MISC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSDAMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 0072826/22/2023504908 625.67 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW 66.04 MISC SUPPLIES: ACE PRGM: TCSD 80.43 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 283.23 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: OTSF: PD 212.57 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 1,336.3068.36 CPR/FIRST AID: MEDIC: FIRE DEPT 3,748.50AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC 0219596/22/2023504909 3,748.50 MILITARY BANNER PROGRAM: TCSD 233.75ANN M HOWELL, DBA ANN HOWELL DESIGN 0206916/22/2023504910 233.75 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JRCAQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO0139506/22/2023504911 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: SPO 69.60 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: FO 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: MP 35.89 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: HA 28.28 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TH 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: AU 62.53 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TVM 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIV 213.97 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PO 62.53 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: AQ 69.60 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: LIB 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TCC 28.55 JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW 743.0629.36 STTLMNT: BRAZILIAN & LATIN JAZZ 6/16 1,026.35ARJONA, GLORIA0230306/22/2023504912 1,026.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS: PARKS: PW 1,400.00AYERS ELECTRIC INC0214006/22/2023504913 1,400.00 READY REFRESH: HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD 2.16BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, DBA READYREFRESH 0013236/22/2023504914 2.16 JUN POOL MAINT: CRC & TESBOB CALLAHANS POOL SERVICE 0184086/22/2023504915 1,100.00 2,050.00JUN POOL MAINT: OLD TOWN FOUN 950.00 STAND AND CARPET: THEATER: TCSDBRAND ASSASSINS0226516/22/2023504916 2,606.68 BANNERS: THEATER: TCSD 1,821.25 MILITARY POLE BANNERS: ECO DEV 12,846.09 MILITARY POLE BANNERS: ECO DEV 19,183.071,909.05 1Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # JUN PLANTSCAPE SVC: CIVIC CTRBRAUN PETER, DBA TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE 0215886/22/2023504917 500.00 700.00JUN PLANTSCAPE SVC: LIBRARY 200.00 APR FINGERPRINTING SVCS: HRCALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE ACCTING 0042486/22/2023504918 392.00 MAY FINGERPRINTING SVCS: VOLUN 441.00 APR FINGERPRINTING SVCS: CUSTO 98.00 APR FINGERPRINTING SVCS: VOLUN 260.00 MAY FINGERPRINTING SVCS: HR 2,220.001,029.00 COMMUNICATION UPDATE: SAFE HOUSE 4,518.00COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS0004426/22/2023504919 4,518.00 SIGNAGE: AQUATICS: TCSD 2,359.34COOKE AARON, DBA PROPER MANAGEMENT 0212916/22/2023504920 2,359.34 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSCOSSOU, CELINE0133796/22/2023504921 2,100.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,100.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 6,300.002,100.00 PLUMBING SVCS: CITY FACSCRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC 0106506/22/2023504922 5,930.00 PLUMBING SVCS: CIVIC CENTER 472.00 PLUMBING SVCS: TCC 1,616.00 PLUMBING SVCS: CHAPEL 2,580.00 PLUMBING REPAIR: STA 84: FIRE 11,808.001,210.00 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 1,708.86DEMCO INC0104616/22/2023504923 1,708.86 PORTABLE TOILET SVC: AULD RD: POLICE DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS 0039456/22/2023504924 133.21 TEMPORARY FENCING: MCCABE CT 95.00 TEMPORARY ADA RESTROOMS: TES 553.97325.76 MAY WTR QUALITY MAINT: DUCK POND/HARV 7,430.00DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES INC 0197206/22/2023504925 7,430.00 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICEDOWNS ENERGY FUEL0041926/22/2023504926 123.61 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MA 1,695.75 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE D 140.47 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DE 57.92 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD 90.28 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEP 114.33 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC 247.23 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG & S 272.37 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW 292.64 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE EN 94.68 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS 1,061.83 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: EOC 4,295.09103.98 2Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # APR CONSULT SVCS: CITYWIDE DRAINAGE: CIP 3,313.84DUDEK0122176/22/2023504927 3,313.84 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSECALDRE MANALILI DE VILLA, AILEEN 0040686/22/2023504928 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 294.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 315.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 168.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,680.00609.00 EMBROIDERY SVCS: PREV: FIREFREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS 0148656/22/2023504929 85.33 PROMO ITEMS: WORKFORCE DEV: T 465.78 PROMO ITEMS: WORKFORCE DEV: T 518.58 PROMO ITEMS: WORKFORCE DEV: T 2,139.78 PROMO ITEMS: WORKFORCE DEV: T 640.86 SUN HATS: HR 5,152.67 MISC PROMOTIONAL ITEMS: HR 9,207.51204.51 MAY CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION: HR 2,143.80GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC0213656/22/2023504930 2,143.80 FIRE SPRINKLER MAINT: STA 92: FIRE DEPT 4,944.00GOLDEN STATE FIRE PROTECTION 0048906/22/2023504931 4,944.00 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI POOLS 1,330.69HASA INC0206286/22/2023504932 1,330.69 MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 1,078.00HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL GROUP INC, DBA FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA 0011356/22/2023504933 1,078.00 ADULT SOFTBALL OFFICIATING SVCS: SPORTS 4,032.00HINER DOUGLAS, DOUGLAS HINER UMPIRING 0225306/22/2023504934 4,032.00 ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 84IDETAIL SUPPLY CO0220566/22/2023504935 221.81 365.57ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 143.76 VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREETS: PW 639.65INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS INC0225696/22/2023504936 639.65 DSGB SVCS: CRC SPLASH PAD: PW21-07 901.50JEFF KATZ ARCHITECTURAL CORP 0208936/22/2023504937 901.50 PLUMBING SUPPLIES: OLD TOWNJOHNSTONE SUPPLY0122856/22/2023504938 505.85 MISC SUPPLIES: PARKING GARAGE 470.22 MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 706.34 MISC SUPPLIES: FOC 337.15 MISC SUPPLIES: TVM 387.63 MISC SUPPLIES: MPSC 2,895.48488.29 3Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # BUSINESS CARDS: PREVENTION: FIRE 81.82JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 0218966/22/2023504939 81.82 REIMB: TEAM PACE 238.17022824 EMPLOYEE #072056/22/2023504940 238.17 MATL TESTING: CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL: CIP M T G L INC0102046/22/2023504941 13,495.00 14,430.00MATL TESTING: CITYWIDE SLURRY S 935.00 TREE SVCS: MEDIANS: PARKSMARIPOSA TREE MANAGEMENT INC 0226646/22/2023504942 260.70 TREE SVCS: S-24: PARKS 3,434.00 TREE SVCS: SP-01 RRSP: PARKS 6,006.58 TREE SVCS: S-06 EMERGENCY: PAR 1,920.89 TREE SVCS: S-24: PARKS 404.00 TREE SVCS: MEDIANS: PARKS 592.90 TREE SVCS: S-18 EMERGENCY: PAR 2,585.44 TREE SVCS: DEBRIS REMOVAL: PAR 7,650.00 TREE SVCS: DUCK POND: PARKS 5,638.10 TREE SVCS: F-06 OLD TOWN: PARKS 606.00 TREE SVCS: S-18 EMERGENCY: PAR 1,700.46 TREE SVCS: S-24 REMOVAL: PARKS 36,278.335,479.26 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATERMISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 0040436/22/2023504943 246.65 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CENT 296.08 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CRC 3,752.66 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 4,046.79-248.60 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,763.13MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 0040406/22/2023504944 1,763.13 SPEAKEASY @ THE MERC: 06/10 628.60MUSIC CONNECTION LLC0190196/22/2023504945 628.60 AUTO SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE DEPT 174.46NAPA AUTO PARTS0029256/22/2023504946 174.46 MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: PARKS: PWNIEVES LANDSCAPE INC0225996/22/2023504947 58,420.50 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: FIRE STA 73 342.23 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RIVERTON PA 114.37 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: DUCK POND: 504.55 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RRSP: PARKS 460.78 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RRSP: PARKS 1,088.55 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: DUCK POND: 325.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RRSP: PARKS 138.77 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: SADDLEWOO 494.44 MAY LDSCP MAINT SVCS: CRC/PARK 140,069.4978,180.30 4Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # VEHICLE MAINT: STREET MAINT: PWOLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE INC 0219986/22/2023504948 543.18 VEHICLE MAINT: FIRE DEPT 123.14 VEHICLE REPAIRS: PARK MAINT: PW 1,783.87 VEHICLE MAINT: PREVENTION: FIRE 3,180.07729.88 CONSULTANT SVCS: STREETLIGHTS: PW22-17 930.00OMB ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS INC, SALAS OBRIEN 0232046/22/2023504949 930.00 TIRE SVCS: STREET MAINT: PWPARKHOUSE TIRE SERVICE INC 0205446/22/2023504950 1,818.79 2,061.59TIRE SVCS: STREET MAINT: PW 242.80 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: TCCPRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY0050756/22/2023504951 14.32 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 10.28 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: CRC 31.45 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 66.3310.28 MAY CAR WASH SVCS: POLICERANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH 0009076/22/2023504952 25.99 VEHICLE WASHING SVCS: INFO TEC 25.99 VEHICLE WASHING SVCS: INFO TEC 126.9875.00 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTRREFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, DISTRIBUTOR 0225376/22/2023504953 72.42 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: PARKING GA 103.10 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CRC 1,039.44 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CRC 1,738.86 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: TVM 3,183.07229.25 MAY '23 SAT PH AIRTIME/MAY FEE: EOC 349.15REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS INTL 0204296/22/2023504954 349.15 UNIFORMS: MAINTENANCE: PW 1,933.25ROSEN AND ROSEN INDUSTRIES INC, DBA R AND R INDUSTRIES 0175496/22/2023504955 1,933.25 LOCKSMITH SVCS: CIVIC CTR 20.00SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 0042746/22/2023504956 20.00 FY 2022-23 CDBG SUBRECIPIENT 3,506.18SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CENTERS 0053296/22/2023504957 3,506.18 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: COUNCIL MTGSARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 0176996/22/2023504958 175.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SPECIAL EVE 225.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SPECIAL EVE 825.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SPECIAL EVE 225.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: CULTURE DA 225.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: MPSC/HUMA 225.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: SPECIAL EVE 275.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: ART NIGHTS 250.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: HARVESTON 2,725.00300.00 5Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # JAZZ @ THE MERC 6/15/23SHERRY BERRY MUSIC0092136/22/2023504959 710.00 1,465.00STTLMNT: JAZZ @ THE MERC 6/8 755.00 STREET LIGHT REMOVAL: PREECE & BUCKEYE 2,014.92SIEMENS MOBILITY INC, YUNEX LLC 0216206/22/2023504960 2,014.92 SUPPLIES: SUMMER FOOD PRGM: TCSD 199.47SMART AND FINAL INC0006456/22/2023504961 199.47 EMERG PEST CONTROL SVCS: PARKS: PW SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 0005196/22/2023504962 94.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: MUSEUM 42.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: FIRE STA 12 74.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: MPSC 29.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: LIBRARY 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: CRC 90.00 PEST CONTROL SVCS: WEDDING CH 451.0032.00 CARPET CLEANING SVCS: LIBRARY 4,300.00STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CLEANING 0023666/22/2023504963 4,300.00 Employee Service Recognition 78.50TERRYBERRY COMPANY0038496/22/2023504964 78.50 DJ/Sound Setup for Special Events: TCSDTIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC0006686/22/2023504965 4,300.00 13,300.00DJ/MC SOUND SVCS: JUNETEENTH:9,000.00 ART OFF THE WALLS: TVM: TCSD 850.00TNT ENTERTAINMENT GROUP LLC 0191006/22/2023504966 850.00 MISC SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 150.36TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL, PRODUCTS INC 0024526/22/2023504967 150.36 MAY DIG SAFE BRD BILLABLE TIX: PWUNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT, OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 0077666/22/2023504968 70.85 374.85MAY DIG SAFE BRD BILLABLE TIX: P 304.00 RFRSHMNTS: ACE EVENT 06/02/23URBANE CAFE, TGH ENTERPRISES LLC 0197936/22/2023504969 661.63 823.01RFRSHMNTS: WORKFORCE PRGMS 161.38 EQUIP REPAIR: STREET MAINT: PW 1,124.46VAN OTTERLOO INC0230556/22/2023504970 1,124.46 CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: JAN-MAR '23 2,156.10VOICES FOR CHILDREN0203996/22/2023504971 2,156.10 DJ SVCS: SKATE PARK JAMS: CRC: TCSD WADDLETON, JEFFREY L0181476/22/2023504972 525.00 1,050.00DJ/MC SVCS: HIGH HOPES: MPSC: T 525.00 6Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSDWATER SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 0018816/22/2023504973 2,447.23 3,346.88MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 899.65 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SVCS: TRAFFIC: PW 2,005.15WILLDAN ASSOCIATES INC0003416/22/2023504974 2,005.15 MAR LDSCP PLN CK & INSPECTION: PLNG YANES BLANCA A, DBA DE GANGE CONSULTING 0210246/22/2023504975 8,050.00 APR LDSCP PLN CK & INSPECTION: 13,665.00 MAY LDSCP PLN CK & INSPECTION: 26,815.005,100.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK:381,604.45 7Page: 06/20/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 3:30:10PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:69 381,604.45 8Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 148,637.66PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 0002466/8/202314983 148,637.66 ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 PAYMENT 37,614.80I C M A RETIREMENT PLAN 303355 0001946/8/202314997 37,614.80 STATE TAX PAYMENT 60,728.37INSTATAX EDD0004446/8/202314998 60,728.37 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 180,511.48INSTATAX IRS0002836/8/202314999 180,511.48 PERS HEALTH PAYMENTPERS HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM 0002456/8/202315003 192,472.21 192,472.21PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.00 ICMA-RC DEF COMP 50 & OVER PAYMENT 3,023.12I C M A RETIREMENT PLAN 303355 0001946/2/202315007 3,023.12 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 35,606.94INSTATAX IRS0002836/1/202315009 35,606.94 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 200.00PERS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 0002466/12/202315014 200.00 15025 6/9/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL CAFETERIA 15L, DBA: WOK IN THE PARK 020343 32.37 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL TEQUILA MUSEO MAYAHUEL022746 22.83 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLROOZEE COACH023412 113.50 SERVICE FEE: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL SOUTHWEST AIRLINES006937 8.00 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLLYFT020953 34.79 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL HYATT001060 38.71 TRANSP: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLROOZEE COACH023412 113.50 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL LA BOU BAKERY & CAFE023409 25.33 LODGING: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNLSHERATON HOTEL006714 521.03 RFRSHMNTS: CAL CITIES CONF: CITY CNL 947.60HYATT00106037.54 MAY 800 SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER 67.06MATRIX TELECOM LLC DBA LINGO 0214346/13/202315026 67.06 1Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # VARIOUS WATER MAY BATCH 1 51,610.67RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 0002626/16/202315027 51,610.67 15029 6/21/2023 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA REGIST: STATE OF THE CITY: CITY CNCL 45.00MURRIETA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 020829 45.00 SUPPORT PAYMENT 138.92CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT 0103496/22/202315030 138.92 ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN PAYMENT 384.62I C M A RETIREMENT PLAN 106474 0213016/22/202315031 384.62 ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 PAYMENT 18,650.31I C M A RETIREMENT PLAN 303355 0001946/22/202315032 18,650.31 STATE TAX PAYMENT 46,872.54INSTATAX EDD0004446/22/202315033 46,872.54 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 15,171.21NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0010656/22/202315035 15,171.21 NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT PAYMENT 427.79NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0190886/22/202315036 427.79 OBRA - PROJECT RETIREMENT PAYMENT 8,077.82NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 0003896/22/202315037 8,077.82 REFUND: DBL PMT INV 00128318 184.20SOTO, NATALIA0234316/20/2023102141 184.20 ACESSIBILITY SFTWR: BLDG DEPT 695.00ACCESS TOOLKIT0225706/22/2023212734 695.00 APPLIANCE: FIRE STA 92 3,200.45ACTION APPLIANCE INC, DBA ACTION APPLIANCE 0042296/22/2023212735 3,200.45 RELEASE & SETTLEMENT OF CLAIM 457.00ADAMS, MICHAEL BRYAN0234056/22/2023212736 457.00 REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD19-3558 5,000.00AT HOME0233926/22/2023212737 5,000.00 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCSDBAKER AND TAYLOR INC0119546/22/2023212738 11.44 44.25BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRTPL: TCS 32.81 UNIFORMS: EMBROIDERY: PLANNING DEPT BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS INC 0155926/22/2023212739 1,814.25 4,073.10STAFF UNIFORMS: HUMAN SVCS: TC 2,258.85 2Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # TEM GRANT PRGM: COMM REINVESTMENT 10,000.00BILINGUAL DICTIONARIES INC0233906/22/2023212740 10,000.00 REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD17-0892 3,000.00CACHAT, MICHAEL0203696/22/2023212741 3,000.00 RIP RAP MATERIALS: VARI CHANNELS: PW CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN MATERIALS CO 0031386/22/2023212742 3,164.24 3,806.33RIP RAP MATERIALS: VARI CHANNEL 642.09 LEGAL PUBLICATION NOTICES: PLANNING 2,553.47CALIF NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 0218516/22/2023212743 2,553.47 DIRECT & OVERLAP DEBT STATEMENT 6/30/23 1,100.00CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL, STATISTICS INC 0206926/22/2023212744 1,100.00 MAY ONLINE DATABASE SUBSCR: POLICE 200.00CERTIFION CORP DBA ENTERSECT 0096406/22/2023212745 200.00 APR SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION: CODE ENF 345.00CORELOGIC INC, DBA CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS 0119226/22/2023212746 345.00 MISC SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPTCOSTCO TEMECULA 4910012646/22/2023212747 250.11 MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD 162.20 MISC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIRE 1,271.84859.53 MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CENTERCOSTCO TEMECULA 4910043296/22/2023212748 205.97 MISC SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: 1,348.50 MISC SUPPLIES: FOOD SVC PRGM: 1,883.00328.53 CLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR 187.50CPS HR CONSULTING0170386/22/2023212749 187.50 PLUMBING SVCS: PD STOREFRONT 262.00CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC 0106506/22/2023212750 262.00 REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE: FINANCE 39.00DEEPAMALA, FNU0234196/22/2023212751 39.00 CASE FILINGS: ANN SAUNA 355.00DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES DGS 0089436/22/2023212752 355.00 ROCKTOBER RECORDING SESSION: TCSD 180.00DISCRETE SOUNDS STUDIOS LLC 0231106/22/2023212753 180.00 APR PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEVESGIL LLC0001646/22/2023212754 20,685.00 FEB PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV 27,857.34 MAR PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV 73,090.5024,548.16 3Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 4 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # MAY SUB-RECIPIENT: FAIR HOUSING SVCS 1,869.83FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC 0153306/22/2023212755 1,869.83 REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD18-0955 3,000.00FCO CONSTRUCTION0233936/22/2023212756 3,000.00 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: COMM DEVFEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/22/2023212757 8.17 99.00EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: POLICE 90.83 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPTFEDERAL EXPRESS INC0001656/22/2023212758 7.18 40.82EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: SPEC EVENTS 33.64 MISC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSDGAYLORD BROS INC0104526/22/2023212759 644.60 981.00MISC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSD 336.40 VEHICLE TELEMATICS: CITY FLEET 1,639.11GEOTAB USA INC0228326/22/2023212760 1,639.11 REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE: FINANCE 39.00GHOLIPOOR, MEHRNAZ0234176/22/2023212761 39.00 breaching tools: tem sheriff 771.27GLOBAL ASSETS INTEGRATED LLC 0231716/22/2023212762 771.27 REIMB: CONDOLENCE WREATH: FIRE 352.11HAYES, MATT0229126/22/2023212763 352.11 ADDITIONAL RAM: INFO TECH 1,043.83HELIXSTORM INC0137496/22/2023212764 1,043.83 REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE: FINANCE 39.00HIZON, THERESA0234186/22/2023212765 39.00 REIMB: TEAM PACE: HR 163.12022946 EMPLOYEE #071156/22/2023212766 163.12 FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT 25,079.95INTERFLEX PAYMENT LLC0231506/22/2023212767 25,079.95 MEMBERSHIP DUES: FIRE DEPT 292.00INTL CODE COUNCIL0032966/22/2023212768 292.00 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL SVCS KELLY SPICERS INC, DBA KELLY SPICERS STORES 0162576/22/2023212769 2,774.28 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL S 200.95 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL S 143.31 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL S 294.79 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: CENTRAL S 192.79 WHITE COPY PAPER: CENTRAL SVC 8,605.894,999.77 4Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 5 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # MAY ANIMAL CONTROL SVCS: TEMECULA 10,500.00LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FRIENDS, DBA ANIMAL FRIENDS OF 0021876/22/2023212770 10,500.00 REIMB: POSTAGE 30.17021208 EMPLOYEE #005356/22/2023212771 30.17 REIMB: FACILITY SUPPLIES: TCSD 105.66021686 EMPLOYEE #006576/22/2023212772 105.66 REIMB: TEAM PACE 761.20011956 EMPLOYEE #004386/22/2023212773 761.20 APPEAL SVCS: THE BANK 616.00MEYERS NAVE, A PROFESSIONAL CORP 0163536/22/2023212774 616.00 REIMB: TEAM PACE 239.49022963 EMPLOYEE #005956/22/2023212775 239.49 DOT TESTING: HR 305.85NATIONAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE INC 0180996/22/2023212776 305.85 REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD16-2045 8,000.00OLD REPUBLIC TITLE COMPANY 0157326/22/2023212777 8,000.00 APPRAISAL SVCS: PLANNING 4,750.00PERDUE ROBERT S DBA, PERDUE RUSSELL & MATTHIES 0184626/22/2023212778 4,750.00 REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD18-3598 15,000.00PK I PALOMAR VILLAGE SC LP0228126/22/2023212779 15,000.00 DOCUMENT FOLDER: SUPPORT SVCS 6,157.43QUADIENT INC0194406/22/2023212780 6,157.43 POSTAGE FOR METER: TEM SHERIFF 257.25QUADIENT INC0194406/22/2023212781 257.25 EXHIBIT TRANSPORT FEE: TVM: TCSD 889.60RADIANT GLOBAL LOGISTICS INC, DBA DISTRIBUTION BY AIR 0207746/22/2023212782 889.60 REIMB: UNIFORMS: CODE ENFORCEMENT 54.34023407 EMPLOYEE #006506/22/2023212783 54.34 RENEW PERMIT: THEATER 114.40RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 0013656/22/2023212784 114.40 STAFFING: LIBRARY 34,580.00RIVERSIDE CO ECO DEV AGENCY, LIBRARY DIV 0140276/22/2023212785 34,580.00 5Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 6 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # FPARC-TM, INV# 235062, 22/23, Q3 2,274,692.73RIVERSIDE CO FIRE DEPARTMENT 0002676/22/2023212786 2,274,692.73 NOV '22 ELECTION SVCS: CITY CLERK 140,219.67RIVERSIDE CO REGISTRAR OF VOTE 0003556/22/2023212787 140,219.67 04/06/23-5/03/23 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,856,876.43RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 0004066/22/2023212788 2,856,876.43 REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE: FINANCE 39.00RODRIGUEZ, MARILYN0234166/22/2023212789 39.00 REFUND: BLDG PERMITS: BLDG & SAFETY 736.80SOLCIUS LLC0207276/22/2023212790 736.80 RFRSHMNTS: HIGH HOPES: TCSD 187.57STADIUM PIZZA INC0002936/22/2023212791 187.57 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSDSTAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT0083376/22/2023212792 75.68 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 77.20 MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 242.9090.02 DAY CAMP FANNY PACKS: CRC: TCSD 433.89STEIN ANDREW, DBA PARKINK0156486/22/2023212793 433.89 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGSSTUART, JENNIFER SARAH0127896/22/2023212794 6,320.00 12,640.00TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 6,320.00 REFUND: BLDG PERMITS: BLDG & PERMITS SUNRUN INSTALLATION SRVCS INC 0190186/22/2023212795 1,446.72 REFUND: BLDG PERMITS: BLDG & P 1,339.20 REFUND: BLDG PERMITS: BLDG & P 3,844.801,058.88 CONSULT SVCS: WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN 12,842.50SWCA INCORPORATED0232216/22/2023212796 12,842.50 PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PWTEMECULA WINNELSON COMPANY 0039416/22/2023212797 271.15 474.03PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 202.88 ENG REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT: LD19-1461 7,500.00TRI POINTE HOMES INC0171636/22/2023212798 7,500.00 REFUNDABLE DEP: LD18-0169: PW 12,500.00UHS OF DELAWARE INC0177546/22/2023212799 12,500.00 5/11-6/10 TASK FORCE TABLETS: POLICE 615.11VERIZON WIRELESS0144866/22/2023212800 615.11 DOOR REPAIRS: CIVIC CENTER 7,901.58VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC0018906/22/2023212801 7,901.58 6Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 7 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK (Continued) Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # REFUND: ENG DEPOSIT: LD18-3011 16,500.00WELLPROFIT INTERNATIONAL0118796/22/2023212802 16,500.00 Grand total for UNION BANK:6,387,740.09 7Page: 06/22/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 8 2:21:46PM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:89 6,387,740.09 8Page: 06/26/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1 10:46:09AM Page:apChkLst Final Bank : union UNION BANK Check TotalAmount PaidDescriptionVendorDateCheck # FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 138,057.12INSTATAX IRS0002836/22/202315034 138,057.12 AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY PAYMENT 3,145.43AFLAC PREMIUM HOLDING, C O BNB BANK LOCKBOX 0035526/26/2023212803 3,145.43 SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00FRANCHISE TAX BOARD0029826/26/2023212804 50.00 PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 234.90PRE PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 0058206/26/2023212805 234.90 Grand total for UNION BANK:141,487.45 1Page: 06/26/2023 Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2 10:46:09AM Page:apChkLst Final checks in this report.Grand Total All Checks:4 141,487.45 2Page: Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve a Five-Year Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement Between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 2023-24 Through Fiscal Year 2027-28 (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Pro Tem Stewart and Council Member Kalfus) ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Manager Cassandra Tabares, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a Five-Year Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce for Fiscal Year 2023-24 through Fiscal Year 2027-28. BACKGROUND: With nearly 1,000 local business/community members, the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (TVCC) is a pivotal component to Temecula’s business community and effecting positive impacts throughout Temecula Valley. The TVCC works on behalf of the City of Temecula with a focus on building a strong local economy through being the “boots on the ground” business advocate for Temecula’s robust and diverse business community. With over 55 years of experience serving the Temecula Valley, the TVCC accomplishes this through providing its members and the community at large unprecedented benefits, top notch educational events such as the Economic Forecast, Legislative Summit, State of the City Address, hundreds of classes/programs and networking opportunities, and resources to help one succeed in their business. These benefits are available to all businesses – whether it be a large manufacturing company, a local non-profit, or small one-person marketing firm. The TVCC serves as an advocate for all businesses dedicated to regional prosperity. The TVCC has become a focal point for business/community support and can direct its resources, as well as align partners, to address key issues. The TVCC Board of Directors is comprised of 21 respected business owners and members; each representing a key business segment. The TVCC also assists the City of Temecula in responding to numerous requests for information on a vast range of topics including relocation assistance, tourism, and business information via phone, walk-in, social media, email, and U.S. mail. The TVCC continues to assist companies seeking to relocate to Temecula and provides them with exceptional customer service, including guidance and information that could make or break a business’ decision to relocate. In addition, the TVCC’s CEO works in conjunction with City Staff and the Economic Development Coalition (EDC) to participate in site visits throughout the year in order to maintain continued, positive relationships with our existing businesses. The TVCC’s CEO is also credited for facilitating and overseeing the Southwest California Manufacturing Council (SCMC), which allows our manufacturing community to actively foster the economic development of a thriving manufacturing sector in Temecula Valley. The Manufacturing Council has a strong membership with a forum to share best practices, do business with one another, and serve as a catalyst for a high school summer internship program that helps educate our local high school students on good-paying manufacturing careers that are available locally. The TVCC currently coordinates over 170 events, programs, and opportunities each year for members to network and connect with other local businesses. The TVCC partners with the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) to offer business counseling services and, on a monthly basis, provides educational workshops offering information on key business issues, such as employer taxes, opportunities for doing business with the Government, and Small Business Assistance (SBA) Loans. The TVCC also provides meeting space to local non-profit organizations, at no charge, and is a strong partner in the Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2). As part of this agreement, the TVCC provides a trial one-year membership, to a maximum of ten start- up companies, who will locate within the City’s TVE2 Business Incubator. It is important to note that current City Economic Development Staff would not be able to absorb the amount of work and services that the TVCC Board of Directors, Staff and volunteer members do to support our business community. With the job count in the City reaching over 55,000 jobs, the highest ever in City history, the need for increased business support and services has also significantly increased. On March 14, 2023, the Economic Development Committee consisting of Mayor Pro Tem James Stewart and Council Member Brenden Kalfus convened a publicly noticed meeting to discuss the Economic Development Funding Requests for FY 2023-24. At this meeting, the Committee commented on how the TVCC works extremely close with the City Staff on economic development and business growth. Through this successful partnership, a healthy business community has been formed with various resources available for support and growth. The previous TVCC, 5-year Funding Agreement was $950,000 at $175,000 annually for the first two fiscal years and $200,000 for the remaining three fiscal years. The TVCC has now requested to increase Economic Development funding by a total of 5% to account for inflationary costs of operations after the COVID 19 pandemic and the growth that the Temecula Valley business community has seen in the past few years. This again is evidenced by our low unemployment rate and highest job count ever in City history. The Committee recommended approval of $200,000 annually for five fiscal years beginning Fiscal Year 2023-24 through Fiscal year 2027-28. Exhibit “A” to the attached agreement outlines services to be provided during Fiscal Years 2023-28. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $200,000 is identified in the City Manager’s/Economic Development line item in the FY 2023-24 Budget. The Finance Department has also programed the $200,000 for each year of the TVCC Agreement in the 5-year budget forecast. ATTACHMENTS: Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve Memorandum of Understanding Between the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula for Vector Control Services and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula for Vector Control Services and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula and the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health have maintained a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Vector Control Services and Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) since the City’s incorporation. Examples of these services include mosquito monitoring, education, prevention, and control, as well as plan check and inspections for properties that have septic systems. Riverside County Department of Environmental Health has extensive experience, staffing, and infrastructure to provide these services. To maintain these services, the City of Temecula and Riverside County Department of Environmental Health have maintained multiple agreements over the course of the City’s history. The proposed MOU consolidates all services into one agreement to efficiently ensure that services are delivered to the City of Temecula. The term of the MOU is for ten (10) years; however, the City of Temecula and County of Riverside may opt of the agreement with thirty (30) days advance notice if service changes were ever deemed necessary. FISCAL IMPACT: Vector Control Services cost approximately $30,000 per fiscal year, which has been budgeted in account 001.162.611.5250 (Other Outside Services). Other service payments are made directly by applicants to the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health. ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum of Understanding 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA (LR23-0171) This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as “CITY” and the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, hereinafter referred to as “COUNTY”, to be effective on the date approved by both parties. I. RECITALS WHEREAS, CITY desires the COUNTY to provide Vector Control Services that include mosquito surveillance and control, and fly, rodent and cockroach advice. Community awareness, public presentations, consultations, and public education with flyers and booklets can also be provided upon request; and WHEREAS, CITY has adopted Riverside County Code section 8.36 et seq., and desires the County to enforce said ordinances; and WHEREAS, CITY desires Environmental Planning review, Technical Assistance, and Plan Review for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) in accordance with the Riverside County Local Agency Management Program (LAMP) (the “Services”); and WHEREAS, CITY does not have an approved LAMP, does not have any existing OWTS ordinances, rules and regulations and the COUNTY’s LAMP was approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board; and WHEREAS, CITY agrees to enact necessary regulation to allow for billing of fees by COUNTY for services to be rendered, according to County of Riverside Ordinance No. 640; and 2 WHEREAS , COUNTY has personnel with sufficient training and expertise to provide such services noted above and as requested by the CITY; and WHEREAS, COUNTY is prepared to provide such services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Memorandum of Understanding; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY agree to now enter into this Memorandum of Understanding for a period of ten (10) years; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions contained herein, the parties mutually agree as follows: II. TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. SUMMARY The CITY requires professional services as described herein from the COUNTY in II.C. B. TERM The term of this MOU shall be effective on the date of execution and shall continue in effect for up to ten (10) years, or until terminated as outlined in Section IV below. C. SERVICES TO BE RENDERED 1) General Comment on COUNTY Services a) COUNTY will only respond to complaints referred directly by CITY staff to COUNTY. Citizen complaints received by COUNTY will be referred to CITY for approval. 3 b) COUNTY will only provide the services noted in 2, 3, 4 and 5 of this section at the request of CITY. c) COUNTY will provide services noted in 6, 7 and 8 for any plans submitted directly to COUNTY. 2) Mosquito Control Services a) COUNTY will respond to complaints and requests for assistance concerning mosquitoes and, when appropriate, take action(s) to abate or control the vector(s). b) COUNTY will conduct mosquito surveillance and control activities, including, but not limited to, fact-finding, inventory of breeding sources, education and consultation, issuing notices of violation, following-up with the offending party when necessary, appearing in court as witness, and taking direct control action to include biological and chemical control when necessary. c) COUNTY will investigate human West Nile virus cases for potential breeding sources. 3) Bee Control Services a) COUNTY will respond to complaints and requests for assistance concerning bees and, when appropriate, take action(s) to abate them. b) COUNTY will maintain a program of public education and consultation in bee identification and management. 4) Other Vector Control Services COUNTY will respond to requests for assistance and to complaints with information and advice. COUNTY will not provide chemical or biological treatment of house vectors. Other vectors include, but are not limited to flies, cockroaches, food-infesting pests and insects, ticks, mites, lice, fleas, and bed bugs; venomous insects such as wasps, yellow jackets, hornets and ants; other venomous arthropods such as scorpions and spiders, and vertebrate pests and vectors such 4 as native rodents, rattle snakes, pest birds, bats and skunks, among others. 5) Sewage, Trash and Garbage Complaints a) Overflowing Sewage: COUNTY will investigate complaints of overflowing sewage and abate the situation if justified, including legal action if requested, i.e., issuing notices of violation, issuing citations, follow-up contact with the offending party when necessary, and appearing in court as witness. b) Trash and Garbage: COUNTY will investigate complaints of illegal storage of household trash and garbage, i.e., solid waste, and abate the s ituation if justified, including legal action if required, i.e., issuing notices of violation, issuing citations, follow-up contact with the offending party when necessary, and appearing in court as witness. This does not include hazardous waste, concrete, wood, construction or demolition materials or debris, abandoned vehicles, tires, scrap metal, motor vehicle parts, or any other items not defined as household trash and garbage. 6) Plan Review Services COUNTY will provide plan review of OWTS for commercial and residential applications within the CITY. This review will include inspections of the property and technical review of the soil percolation study to ensure compliance with the Riverside County LAMP. Requests for an OWTS shall be accompanied by a Cit y application and/or building permit and shall be submitted in an acceptable format by the project proponent to a County Environmental Health office for their review. The project proponent shall be responsible for the payment of any applicable fees, as established in County Ordinance 640 and codified in Riverside County Code, Ch. 4.52 for the type of review requested at the time of submission of the request, to cover the cost of services provided. All such review shall be provided within fifteen (15) working days of submittal of a completed application. Any payments shall be made directly to COUNTY and CITY shall not be responsible for any payments due from applications. 5 7) Planning Review: COUNTY will provide environmental planning review to the CITY for all residential and commercial projects proposing OWTS, for the sole purpose of ensuring compliance with Riverside County LAMP. The project proponent shall be responsible for the payment of any applicable fees, at the current hourly rate established in County Ordinance 640 as codified in Riverside County Code, Ch. 4.52, to cover the cost of services provided. 8) Inspection/Review of Annual Evaluation for Advanced Treatment System (ATS): COUNTY will provide inspection and/or review of the annual evaluation report for ATSs as required in the Riverside County LAMP. The project proponent and/or property owner shall be responsible for the payment of any applicable fees, as established in County Ordinance 640 and codified in Riverside County Code, Ch. 4.52, to cover the cost of services provided. 9) OWTS Excluded Services Services to be rendered specifically exclude COUNTY response to, and enforcement of any complaints regarding malfunction or failure of an OWTS. CITY agrees to enact any ordinances or regulations necessary to enforce the correction of any failure of any OWTS, and to enforce in a manner consistent with the Riverside County LAMP. 10) Conflicting OWTS Regulations CITY shall rescind or suspend for the duration of this agreement and any subsequent renewals, any and all ordinances, regulations or other mandatory laws regarding OWTS systems within the CITY to avoid duplication of laws or conflicting laws. CITY shall also enact necessary implementation ordinances, regulations or other laws that would allow the provisions of the LAMP to control within the CITY’s border and also that would allow COUNTY to provide services under the LAMP. 6 D. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES 1) Services in Section II, C parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 a) CITY agrees to pay COUNTY at the rate in County Ordinance No. 640 for the cost of specific services rendered to CITY residents. CITY accepts the rate established in County Ordinance No. 640 as the total hourly cost to COUNTY to provide said services; CITY agrees to pay COUNTY such rate for all the time spent rendering such services as described herein, including travel time, and time spent attending City meetings. In addition, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for actual costs of pesticides and supplies used. This shall not include any additional costs for other services, such as aerial application of pesticides, or aerial photography, which shall be approved in advance by the CITY. b) COUNTY shall submit itemized billings for the items as outlined in Attachment “A” of Agreement to CITY on a quarterly basis, for all services rendered. CITY agrees to pay all such non-disputed charges within sixty (60) days of receipt of itemized statements therefore. c) All administrative citation amounts charged by the COUNTY agains t CITY residents and/or businesses for any of the actions taken by COUNTY shall be used to offset against amounts charged to the CITY minus the cost of processing the citation, which would be retained by the COUNTY. 2) Services in Section II. C parts 6, 7 and 8 CITY shall enact any necessary ordinances to allow for COUNTY to directly bill any applicant for services rendered. E. PERSONNEL The services provided by the COUNTY shall be performed by COUNTY personnel under the control and direction of COUNTY. To the extent that CITY personnel may also 7 participate in any of the activities herein provided for, any expenses by the CITY in this process shall be borne by CITY. F. MUTUAL HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION 1) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, CITY shall and does agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless COUNTY, its agencies, districts, special districts and departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives (collective “County indemnitees”) for, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, awards, judgements and expenses, attorney and/or consultant fees and costs, taxable or otherwise, of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity, directly or indirectly arising out of, caused by, or resulting from (1) any action taken by CITY in connection with this Agreement, or (2) any negligent act or omission of CITY, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents, or representatives (collectively, “City Liabilities”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the only City Liabilities with the respect to which CITY’s obligation to indemnify, including the cost to defend, the Indemnitees does not apply is with respect to City Liabilities resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of a County Indemnitee, or to the extent such claims do not arise out of, pertain to or relate to the Services contemplated in this Agreement. a) In the event there is conflict between this clause and California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civil Code Section 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve CITY from indemnifying the COUNTY to the fullest extent allowed by law. b) With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by CITY, CITY shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of th eir its own choice, subject to approval of COUNTY, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall have the right to a djust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of COUNTY; provided, however that 8 any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes CITY’s indemnification to COUNTY as set forth herein. CITY’S obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless County shall be subject to CITY having given COUNTY written notice within a reasonable period of time of the claim or of the commencement of the related action as the case may be, and information and reasonable assistance, at CITY’S expense, for the defense or settlement thereof. CITY’S obligation her eunder shall be satisfied when CITY has provided to COUNTY the appropriate form of dismissal relieving COUNTY from any liability for the action or claim involved. 2) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, COUNTY shall and does agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless CITY, its agencies, districts, special districts and departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives (collectively “City Indemnitees”) for, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, awards, judgements and expenses, attorney and/or consultant fees and costs, taxable or otherwise, of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity, directly or indirectly arising out of, caused by, or resulting from (1) the Services performed hereunder by COUNTY, or any part thereof, (2) the Agreement, including any approved amendments or modifications, or (3) any negligent act omission of COUNTY, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents, or representatives (collectively “County Liabilities”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the only County Liabilities with respect to which COUNTY’S obligation to indemnify, including the cost to defend, the Indemnitees does not apply is with respect to County Liabilities resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnitee, or to the extent such claims do not arise out of, pertain to or relate to the Services contemplated in this in the Agreement. a) In the event there is conflict between this clause and California Civil Code Section 2782, this clause shall be interpreted to comply with Civi l Code 2782. Such interpretation shall not relieve COUNTY from indemnifying the CITY to 9 the fullest extent allowed by law. b) With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by COUNTY, COUNTY shall, at their sole cost, have the right to use counsel of their own choice, subject to approval of CITY, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall have the right to adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim without the prior consent of CITY provided, however, that any such adjustment, settlement or compromise in no manner whatsoever limits or circumscribes COUNTY’S indemnification to CITY as set forth herein. COUNTY’S obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless CITY shall be subject to CITY having given written notice within a reasonable period of time of the claim, or of the commencement of the related action, as the case may be, and information and reasonable assistance, at CITY’S expense, for the defense or settlement thereof. COUTNY’S obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when COUNTY has provided to CITY the appropriate form of dismissal relieving CITY from an liability for the action or claim involved. III. RECORDS County agrees to maintain records and documentation of the services rendered and supplies used pursuant to this Agreement for a period of five (5) years past the close of each calendar year. Such records or copies thereof shall be accessible to CITY for review upon reasonable notification by CITY without copying charges. IV. AMENDMENTS Any amendment, modification, or variation from the terms of this MOU shall be in writing and shall be effective only upon mutual approval by the authorized parties. V. TERMINATION Either CITY or COUNTY may terminate this MOU at any time by giving thirty (30) day written notice with or without cause to the designated contacts. Upon receipt of any notice of termination on the agreed upon effective date of termination, services shall cease 10 thereafter. Upon termination of this MOU, any OWTS under permit and subject to annual inspection shall revert to the CITY for inspection and permitting. Any fees paid to the COUNTY for an annual permit prior to notification of termination, shall not be refunded by the COUNTY. Termination of this agreement does not terminate the parties’ responsibility for payment of prior services rendered. The CITY shall be responsible for payment of all services rendered by COUNTY prior to the effective termination date of this MOU. VI. COMPLETE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This written MOU, including all writings specifically incorporated hereby in reference, shall constitute the complete MOU between the parties hereto. No oral agreement or representation not reduced to writing and specifically incorporated herein shall be of any force or effect, nor shall any such oral agreement or representation be binding upon the parties hereto. Any previous agreements between the CITY and COUNTY, whether oral or written, with regards to the activities outlined in Section II.C of this MOU, shall be supplanted by this MOU. Other agreements or contracts between the CITY and COUNTY, not involving OWTS, shall be unaffected by this MOU. VII. JURISDICTION/VENUE This MOU shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. CITY and COUNTY agree and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of California for all purposes regarding this MOU, and further agrees that venue of any action brought hereunder shall be exclusively in the County of Riverside. 11 VIII. NOTICE All written notices to the parties hereto shall be sent by United States mail, postage prepaid by registered or certified mail addressed as follows: CITY: COUNTY: Attn: City Manager City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health 4065 County Circle Drive Riverside, CA 92503 IX. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Both CITY and COUNTY do covenant to each individual executing this MOU on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be executed on ______________________________ (Date) CITY OF TEMECULA _________________________________ Dated: Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Dated: Randi, Johl, City Clerk 12 APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ Dated: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE _________________________________ Dated: Jeff Johnson, Director of Environmental Health APPROVED AS TO FORM: Minh C. Tran County Counsel __________________________________ Dated: ___________________________ Caroline K. Monroy, Deputy County Counsel 13 ATTACHMENT “A” CITY OF TEMECULA QUARTERLY BILLING STATEMENT COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (Billing Timeline Dates), 20XX As per the Agreement signed between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health and the City of Temecula (LR23-0171) this is the Quarterly Billing Statement for activities performed by Environmental Health. Attached is documentation of activities performed, hours expended, and any pesticides or supplies used. The total amount billed for this quarterly period is: $ (Amount) Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Fire Chief DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Adopt the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Mikel Alford, Emergency Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2022 CITY OF TEMECULA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ANNEX TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI- JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN BACKGROUND: The Disaster Mitigation and Cost Recovery Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) amended the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act by placing a new emphasis on hazard mitigation planning, primarily moving from post-disaster mitigation to pre-disaster mitigation. As part of DMA 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the Act requiring local government, state, and special jurisdictions to develop and maintain hazard mitigation plans. In order to qualify for future hazard mitigation grants, each jurisdiction must prepare, and have approved by the Federal Government, a local hazard mitigation plan (LHMP). An LHMP must be approved every five years per DMA 2000. The City of Temecula’s efforts to update the 2017 LHMP Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional HMP began in early 2022. The goal was to bring together a multi-disciplinary team of stakeholders made up of local business, community members, city staff, and first responders to create a comprehensive LHMP that identified and assessed the multitude of hazards within the city. The planning process included a methodical approach to developing the LHMP inclusive of FEMA’s emphasis on the “whole community.” The whole community concept promotes inclusion of not only emergency managers into the planning process but other city department representatives and key external partners. Temecula’s planning process incorporated three phases: 1) prepare, 2) develop, and 3) finalize. The multi-disciplinary team was instrumental in the reorganization of the plan in order to bring it in alignment with current FEMA standards. As such, the plan is broken down into eight (8) easily identifiable chapters, they are: introduction, planning process, community profile, capability assessment, hazard assessment, risk & vulnerability assessment, mitigation strategies, and plan administration. The 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan) has been reviewed by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services and FEMA. On June 27, 2023, FEMA determined that the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was eligible for final approval. Final approval from FEMA requires a formal resolution from the City adopting the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan as a part of the City's hazard planning process. It is recommended that the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan be adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan will enable the City to maintain its eligibility for pre-disaster and post-disaster hazard mitigation grant funding from FEMA. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE 2022 CITY OF TEMECULA LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN ANNEX TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY OPERATIONAL AREA MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, President William J. Clinton signed H.R. 707, the Disaster Mitigation and Cost Reduction Act of 2000, into law on October 30, 2000; and WHEREAS, the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all jurisdictions to be covered by a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) to be eligible for Federal Emergency Management Agency pre- and post-disaster funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula acted as the lead agency in the development of the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula and the participating stakeholders are within the City of Temecula and the Riverside County Operational Area; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula is committed to establishing effective processes to mitigate potential losses from natural disasters before they occur; and WHEREAS, the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) have reviewed the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi- Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan; and WHEREAS, formal adoption of the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan by the City of Temecula is required before final approval of the plan can be obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and WHEREAS, The City of Temecula has determined that It would be in the best interest of the City of Temecula to adopt the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex to the Riverside County Operational Area Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council adopts the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Page|1 Page|2 This page is intentionally left blank Page|3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Plan 11 1.2 Scope of the Plan 11 1.3 Hazard Mitigation Planning Directive 11 1.4 Promulgation Authority 12 1.5 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption 12 1.6 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 12 2. Planning Process 2.1 Overview 13 2.2 Methodology and Timeline 13 2.2.1 Participation in the Regional OA Planning Process 15 2.3 Planning Team 16 2.3.1 Members 16 2.3.2 Meetings 16 2.4 Community Stakeholder Involvement 17 2.4.1 Recurring Coordination 17 2.4.2 Stakeholder Mitigation Related Planning Resources 18 2.5 Public Outreach 19 2.5.1 LHMP Awareness Campaign 19 2.5.2 Mitigation Awareness Campaign 20 3. Community Profile 3.1 Location 23 3.2 Geography 24 3.3 History 27 3.4 Climate 27 3.4.1 Precipitation and Rainfall 28 3.4.2 Wind 28 3.5 Demographics 29 3.6 Economy 30 3.6.1 Major Employers in Temecula and Surrounding Vicinity 32 3.7 Land Use 33 3.7.1 Potential Land Use 34 3.7.2 Existing Land Use 36 3.7.3 Development Trends 37 3.8 Key Assets 38 4. Capability Assessment 4.1 Personnel Resources 39 4.1.1 Government 39 4.1.2 Contractors 51 4.1.3 Volunteers 51 4.1.4 Mutual Aid 52 4.1.5 Partnerships 52 Page|4 4.2 Mitigation Governance Resources 52 4.2.1 Laws, Regulations, Codes, and Ordinances 53 4.2.2 Plans, Reports, Studies 55 4.2.3 Programs 57 4.3 Technical Resources 59 4.3.1 Proficiencies and Expertise 59 4.3.2 Technology 59 4.3.3 Communications 59 4.4 Fiscal Resources 60 4.4.1 Government Fund 61 4.4.1.1 City of Temecula Measure “S” Fund 62 4.4.2 Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds 63 4.4.3 Education and Outreach Capabilities 63 4.4.4 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Participation 65 4.5 Expansion of and Improvement Upon Mitigation Capabilities 66 5. Hazard Assessment 5.1 Overview 69 5.2 Hazard Identification 69 5.3 Hazard Screening Prioritization 70 5.4 Hazard Profiles 71 5.4.1 Top 10 Hazards 71 5.4.2 Other Hazards of Significance 104 6. Risk Assessment 6.1 Overview 125 6.2 Disaster Proclamation History 125 6.3 Disaster Proclamation Process 126 6.4 Vulnerability Assessment 127 6.5 Hazard Risk Rating 127 6.6 City of Temecula Vulnerability and Risk Assessment 120 6.6.1 Identification of Critical Facilities and Assets 130 6.6.2 Cultural and Natural Resources Inventory 130 6.6.3 Risk Assessment and Potential Loss 130 6.6.4 Vulnerable Populations 132 6.6.5 Analysis of Potential Losses 134 7. Mitigation Strategy 7.1 Overview 137 7.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives 137 7.3 Progress Implementing Mitigation Measures 139 7.4 Mitigation Measures Prioritization 139 7.5 Mitigation Measures and Projects 141 7.6 Mitigation Measure Implementation Plan 143 8. Plan Administration 8.1 Monitoring, Evaluation and Updating the Plan 147 8.1.1 Coordinating Body 147 Page|5 8.2 Incorporation into other Planning Efforts 148 8.3 Continued Stakeholder and Public Involvement 149 8.4 Point of Contact 149 Appendix 1 Adoption Resolution 151 Appendix 2 Planning Team Members TBD Appendix 3 Planning Team Members Meeting Attendance Matrix TBD Appendix 4 Public Outreach TBD Appendix 5 Key Assets and Facilities TBD Appendix 6 List of Significant Earthquakes in California since 1700 TBD Appendix 7 Public Survey Results TBD List of Tables Table 2.1 – Planning Team Meetings Table 3.1 – Average Temperatures – City of Temecula Table 3.2 – Major Employers Table 3.3 – Land Use Categories Table 3.4 – Building Stock Inventory – City of Temecula Table 4.1 – Education and Outreach Resources Table 4.2 – National Flood Insurance Program Participation Table 5.1 – Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale Table 5.2 – Richter Scale Table 5.3 – Recent Fires Occurring in or around the City of Temecula (2000-2022) Table 5.4 – FEMA Flood Zone Designations Table 5.5 – Beaufort Scale Table 5.6 - Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale Table 5.7 - Fujita Tornado Scale Table 6.1 - Emergency or Disaster Declarations, City of Temecula Table 6.2 – Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) Page|6 Table 6.3 - CPRI Hazard Scores and Risk Rating Table 6.4 - CPRI Hazard Rating Summary Table 6.5 - Analysis of City’s Critical Infrastructure Table 6.6 – City of Temecula Threatened-Population Metrics Table 6.7 - Analysis of Potential Losses Table 7.1 - Status of Previous Mitigation Measures Table 7.2 - Mitigation Actions (Hazard / Goal Alignment) Table 7.3 - Mitigation Projects Table 7.4 - Mitigation Actions – Implementation Plan List of Figures Figure 2.1 – Planning Methodology Figure 2.2 – Planning Timeline Figure 3.1 – City of Temecula Figure 3.2 – Surrounding Jurisdictions Figure 3.3 – Physical Features Surrounding the City of Temecula Figure 3.4 – Average Wind Speeds City of Temecula Figure 3.5 – Historical Population Estimates for the City of Temecula, 2012-2022 Figure 3.6 – SCAG Housing Statistics, Temecula 2020 Figure 3.7 – Total Number of Jobs in the City of Temecula 2007-2017 Figure 3.8 – Total Number of Jobs in the City of Temecula by Industry 2007-2017 Figure 3.9 – Unemployment Rate, City of Temecula Figure 3.10 – General Plan Land Use Map Figure 3.11 – Land Use Distribution Figure 3.12 – Existing Land Use Map Figure 4.1 - City of Temecula Organizational Structure (1) Figure 4.2 - City of Temecula Organizational Structure (2) Page|7 Figure 4.3 – General Fund Projections Figure 4.4 – General Fund Revenue Figure 4.5 – General Fund Expenditures Figure 4.6 – Measure S Appropriations Figure 5.1 - Hazard Prioritization Matrix Figure 5.2 – Riverside County / Temecula Current Drought Conditions Figure 5.3 – Riverside County / Temecula Current Drought Conditions Figure 5.4 – Elsinore Fault Line – City of Temecula Figure 5.5 – Temecula Fault Lines Figure 5.6 – San Andreas Fault – Historical Timeline Figure 5.7 – California 30-Year Earthquake Probabilities Figure 5.8 – NOAA’s National Weather Service Heat Index Figure 5.9 – Comparison between Historic and Projected Temperatures Figure 5.10 – Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Response Area (LRA) Figure 5.11 – Temecula 100 Year Flood Map Figure 5.12 – People Killed & Injured in Crashes Involving Large Trucks / Crash Type Figure 5.13 - Vail Dam Flood Inundation Map Figure 5.14 - Skinner Dam Inundation Map Figure 5.15 - Diamond Valley Lake Dam Inundation Map(s) Figure 5.16 – San Onofre Nuclear Zone Map Page|8 This page is intentionally left blank Page|9 Disasters can cause loss of life, damage buildings and infrastructure, and have devastating consequences for a community’s economic, social, and environmental well -being. Hazard mitigation, actions taken to reduce or eliminate long-term risk to life, property, and the environment from hazards, can significantly reduce these impacts. Impacts from hazards are a challenge to many jurisdictions, its leaders, and its citizens. After catastrophic disaster events , communities can experience power outages, loss of water and sewer service, loss of telecommunications, limited access to fuel, and closed roadways. Depending on the magnitude of the event, recovery from these events can take weeks, months, and in some cases, years. The goal of many communities is to reduce the potential impacts from disaster events thus effectively shortening the recovery time. In emergency management, this is generally called mitigation. Mitigation is defined by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as “any action taken to reduce and/or eliminate the long-term risk to human life and property from natural hazards.” Mitigation is one of the primary phases of the Disaster Cycle and is the only phase specifically dedicated to breaking the cycle of damage. The goal of mitigation is to build resiliency within the community, enabling a more efficient and effective response to and recovery from disasters and/or major emergencies. To assist communities become more resilient to hazards, FEMA developed a program and guidance around the creation of Local Hazard Mitigation Plans (LHMPs). LHMPs promote a comprehensive planning process, requiring an assessment of local capabilities against impacts from hazards in order to identify potential projects and/or strategies. Within an approved and adopted LHMP, cities, counties, and special districts are eligible for Federal Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants offered through FEMA: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC; formerly Pre- Disaster Mitigation – PDM), and Flood Management Assistance (FMA). The HMA grants are a great source of funding to help implement local mitigation actions identified in the LHMP. This update to the City of Temecula LHMP is built upon previous mitigation efforts within the City and incorporated new, relevant information into the plan. Part of this update process includes reassessing and reevaluating: local capabilities (personnel resources, governance, technical skills, and fiscal resources); community hazards (identification, impacts, and prioritization); and mitigation goals, objectives, and measures/actions. Significant consideration was given to acknowledging new (and existing) challenges and issues facing the City (i.e., pandemic, civil PREFACE Page|10 disturbance, technology disruption, and wind driven fire events). During this update, the city tried to take a more comprehensive, strategic approach to the LHMP. This led to reorganizing the plan and also adding, renaming, and expanding hazards as well as mitigation actions. Because the LHMP must include information to meet federal requirements and guidance , it includes information not traditionally found in other planning documents. This can lead to a large, cumbersome document, making it difficult to easily access specific information. In an attempt to ensure the LHMP contains all required information and is user-friendly; it has been organized as follows: Chapter 1: Introduction – provides information on the purpose of the plan, outlines the scope of the work, and presents the adoption process and authority. Chapter 2: Planning Process – provides information on the methodology used to prepare the LHMP, including a list of the Planning Team members and the public outreach efforts. Chapter 3: Community Profile – provides background information on the city, ensuring all Planning Team members have a common understanding of the dynamics within the community. Chapter 4: Capability Assessment – provides information on the current mitigation efforts by the city, including department roles and responsibilities, existing plans/programs/codes, and available funding. Chapter 5: Hazard Assessment – provides information on hazards within the city and assesses the priority of each hazard. Chapter 6: Risk & Vulnerability Assessment – provides information on the potential impacts, through exposure and loss (damage) estimates for each hazard within the city. Chapter 7: Mitigation Strategies – provides information on the actions/projects the city is proposing to address the vulnerabilities to the high-risk hazards within the city. Chapter 8: Plan Administration – provides information on how the city intends to keep the LHMP current, incorporate it into other efforts, and share it with the public. Page|11 The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) is a “living document” that should be reviewed, reevaluated, monitored, and revised to reflect changing conditions and new information. As required, the LHMP must be updated every five (5) years to remain in compliance with regulations to receive Federal Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants. At a minimum, this plan shall be reviewed annually. The City of Temecula has had several approved and adopted LHMP’s, the last being in 2017. This LHMP is an update to the 2017 City of Temecula LHMP. The City of Temecula’s efforts to update the LHMP began in early 2022. The goal was to br ing all members of the city (local business, community members) together to create a plan that identified and assessed the various hazards within the city. The desire was to have the city develop a comprehensive LHMP that was inclusive of all potential hazards that could affect the city. 1.1 Purpose of the Plan The purpose of this plan is to outline a mitigation strategy to help reduce and/or eliminate impacts from hazards within the City of Temecula. 1.2 Scope of the Plan The scope of this plan is to: 1) assess relevant existing conditions and capabilities within the city; 2) identify potential hazards and their impacts to the city; and 3) propose additional mitigation measures to address the impacts to the high-priority hazards within the city. In support of this scope, this update will: evaluate mitigation progress since the approved and adopted LHMP; implement and document a comprehensive planning process; present actions to maintain and integrate the LHMP with other City plans; and establish methods to continuously inform and educate the public on hazards and actions that can be taken to reduce and/or eliminate the impact. 1.3 Hazard Mitigation Planning Directive In 2000, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) adopted revisions to Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR). This revision is known as “Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) 2000”. Section 322 (a-d) of DMA 2000 requires that local governments, as a condition of receiving federal disaster mitigation funds, have an approved and adopted Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) that describes the process for assessing hazards, risks, and vulnerabilities; identifying and prioritizing mitigation actions; and soliciting input from the community (public), key stakeholders, and adjacent jurisdictions/agencies. A LHMP must be approved every five (5) years per DMA 2000. While the County of Riverside is responsible for adopting the 2022 Riverside County Operational Area Multi -Jurisdictional Local 1. INTRODUCTION Page|12 Hazard Mitigation Plan, the City of Temecula is responsible for adopting the annex to the County’s plan – more specifically, the 2022 City of Temecula Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. 1.4 Promulgation Authority The City Council is the legislative body of the City of Temecula. It decides policy for the municipal government, enacts laws, and oversees all activities of the City. The City Council also serves as the governing body of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency. This promulgation authority is vested in the members of the City Council. A list of members of the Temecula City Council include: Mayor Zack Schwank Council Member Brendan Kalfus Mayor Pro-Tem James “Stew” Stewart Council Member Curtis Brown Council Member Jessica Alexander 1.5 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Adoption The City of Temecula will submit plans to the Riverside County Emergen cy Management Department (EMD) who will review and collate prior to forwarding to the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) for review prior to being submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The City of Temecula will wait to receive an “Approval Pending Adoption” letter from FEMA before taking the plan to the City Council for adoption. The update of the City of Temecula LHMP was reviewed and adopted by the City Council on 25 July 2023 under Resolution NUMBER. A copy of the Resolution is located in Appendix 1. 1.6 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Categorical Exemption: This planning activity is categorically exempt under Title 14 of the Cal. Admin. Code Section 15061(b)(3)(common sense exemption) and Section 15262 (feasibility and planning studies), on a separate and independent basis. The commonsense exemption applies because it can be seen with certainty that the adoption of the LHMP and its’ incorporation into the General Plan by reference, will not have a significant effect on the environment. The LHMP is a planning study which informs the City of vulnerabilities to natural hazards and potential future actions to mitigate risks. Adoption of the LHMP is not a commitment to any future action, nor is it a decision to approve, adopt, or fund any of the potential mitigation actions identified. Page|13 2.1 Overview This section demonstrates the methodology used by the City of Temecula to develop the LHMP. FEMA’s LHMP development guidance outlines recommended actions, emphasizing the “whole community” approach in the planning process. The whole community concept promotes inclusion of not only emergency managers but other City department representatives (e.g., public works, economic development, community development, planning, building & safety), as well as outside partners (e.g., surrounding cities, special districts, business leaders) to participate in the LHMP planning effort. Soliciting and considering input from diverse interests is essential to building a comprehensive plan and gaining community-wide support for the plan. 2.2 Methodology and Timeline To complete the update of the LHMP, the City of Temecula incorporated a three (3) phase planning process: 1) Prepare; 2) Develop; and 3) Finalize (Figure 2.1). Phase 2 – Develop, has three (3) sub-phases that establish the current conditions, determine the risk and vulnerabilities, and identifies strategies and projects. In addition, Figure 2.2 depicts the timeline to complete the project. While this methodology is in alignment with the FEMA guidance, sequence and naming of the phases were adjusted to better suit the needs of the City of Temecula. Figure 2.1 – Planning Methodology (2022) icko Mee ng Work Plan Establish Planning Team Develop Outreach Plan Community Pro le Hazards Pro le Capabili es Fiscal esources ey Assets Exposure ulnerabili es Impacts Goals Ob ec ves Ac on Implementa on Plan Priori za on eview Approval Adopt Disseminate Training Exercises eview pdate Incorporate Info and Leverage Exis ng Plans PDATE 2. PLANNING PROCESS Page|14 Figure 2.2 – Planning Timeline (2022) Under the Prepare phase, general project tasks were completed. This included conducting an Administrative Kick-Off meeting with the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT), an identification of the Public Outreach effort, and a Kick-Off meeting with the city’s executive team. As mentioned, the Develop phase had three (3) sub-phases. During the Existing Conditions sub- phase, the Planning Team confirmed current City mitigation capabilities, including identification of departments supporting mitigation, current governance guiding mitigation efforts, identification of fiscal resource availability to possibly support mitigation, discussion of key assets, and identification and description of local hazards within the City. Under the Risk Assessment sub-phase, the Planning Team reviewed exposure and impacts of hazards within the City, and prioritized hazards. The final sub-phase, Mitigation Strategies, had the Planning Team discuss previous mitigation efforts, identify, and prioritize new mitigation projects, and develop and implementation plan for each project. Throughout the Develop Phase, plans and other documents, both internal and external, were also analyzed and leveraged to ensure decisions were based on the best available information and that proposed actions were compatible with other efforts. And conversely, efforts were made to encourage results from the LHMP planning process were considered and incorporated into other planning efforts. The last phase of the planning process methodology was Finalize. During this phase, the Planning Team reviewed and provided additional comments on the complete LHMP before being Page|15 forwarded to the County of iverside, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) and FEMA. This phase also included addressing both CalOES and FEMA comments and working with the City Council to adopt the LHMP. During the planning process, draft LHMP sections (i.e., capabilities, hazards, vulnerability, mitigation strategies) were disseminated for review and comment as the Planning Team moved through each phase and sub-phase. This helped the Planning Team focus their review on the subject matter at hand and enforced the relationship between the phases. At the end of the planning process, another review cycle was provided, this time with all draft sections under one cover. 2.2.1 Participation in Regional (OA) Planning Process The City of Temecula participated in the Regional LHMP planning process with the Riverside County Operational Area by attending LHMP meetings and public hearings. The City of Temecula participated in Riverside County wor kshops, conferences, and meetings, including: • 1 May 2022: Riverside County Emergency Management Department reached out to the City of Temecula to ascertain their intent to participate in the multi-jurisdiction LHMP planning process and obtain a letter of commitment. • 17 May 2022: The City of Temecula processed their letter of commitment to participate in the Riverside County Multi-Jurisdictional LHMP Planning Process and provided it to the Riverside County Emergency Management Department. • 1 June 2022: The City of Temecula received an invitation to participate in the Riverside County LHMP Multi-Jurisdiction Workshop that was scheduled to occur on 15 June 2022. • 15 June 2022: The City of Temecula participated in the Riverside County LHMP Jurisdiction Workshop to begin the planning process. o During this meeting, an introduction to the OA planning process was introduced. Numerous tools were provided to the participants to ensure they had a building block in which to begin their individual planning processes • 14 July 2022: Attended the Riverside County Emergency Managers Association (RCEMA) Meeting where the OA LHMP was discussed. • 3 August 2022: Attended the Riverside County OA LHMP Steering Committee Planning Meeting where the membership continued to discuss the p rocess, where the OA was at within the planning process, and discussed measures to assist the local jurisdictions in completing their individual plans. • 10 August 2022: Attended the Riverside County OA LHMP Workshop to work on planning updates to the current jurisdictional LHMP. • 5 Oct 2022: Attended the Riverside County OA LHMP Steering Committee Planning Meeting where the membership continued to discuss the process, where the OA was at Page|16 within the planning process, and discussed measures to assist the local jurisdictions in completing their individual plans. • 4 Jan 2023: Attended the Riverside County OA LHMP Steering Committee Planning Meeting where the membership continued to discuss the process, where the OA was at within the planning process, and discussed measures to assist the local jurisdictions in completing their individual plans. 2.3 Planning Team Building on the whole community concept, a Planning Team was established to assist with the updating of the City of Temecula LHMP. The primary goal of the Planning Team is to help define and identify the strategies within the LHMP. The Planning Team was led by representatives from the Office of Emergency Management. The Office of Emergency Management representatives took on the responsibility of Project Manager and facilitated and coordinated Planning Team activities. Additionally, the City of Temecula Office of Emergency Management utilized their organic Emergency Manager to provide technical support and provide the final updated LHMP. 2.3.1 Members The City of Temecula Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) was comprised of subject matter experts who could provide the greatest benefit to the team or represented specific topics covered by the LHMP. Leveraging the list of Planning Team members during the last update to the LHMP, the Office of Emergency Management evaluated, expanded, and confirmed the list of Planning Team members. An email invite was sent out to each Planning Team member and a series of follow-up phone calls were conducted to discuss the project and confirm participation. Keeping the Planning Team to a manageable number of members while ensuring that all perspectives are captured and/or included in the process is challenging. To balance this, the Planning Team members were urged to act as liaisons to community groups with whom they regularly interact with, exchanging thoughts on the LHMP with other groups in the community. Planning Team members were encouraged to communicate the direction and status of the planning effort to their outside members and in return they were expected to bring outside perspectives to the Planning Team. The City of Temecula took great efforts to engage and include as many Planning Team members as possible. A list of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team members can be found in Appendix 2. 2.3.2 Meetings There were a series of meetings held with the Planning Team. Each meeting had a primary focus and provided an opportunity to discuss/review information and exchange ideas. Below is a list of the Planning Team meetings (Table 2.1) and Planning Team member attendance at each meeting can be found at Appendix 3. Page|17 Table 2.1 – Planning Team Meetings Date Purpose of the Meeting 14 Sep 22 Kickoff Meeting 12 Oct 22 Capabilities Planning Meeting #1 (Community Profile / Key Assets) 27 Oct 22 Public Meeting – Public/Traffic Safety Commission 2 Nov 22 Capabilities Planning Meeting #2 17 Nov 22 Hazard Assessment Meeting #1 15 Dec 22 Hazard Assessment Meeting #2 18 Jan 23 Planning Review Meeting (Post Public Comment) 26 Jan 23 Public Meeting – Public/Traffic Safety Commission 01 Feb 23 Public Meeting – Planning Commission 2.4 Community Stakeholder Involvement 2.4.1 Recurring Coordination The City of Temecula attends and coordinates several meetings with community stakeholders focused on Emergency Management topics (i.e., response, recovery, mitigation, preparedness, and prevention). Prior to the LHMP update process, the city leverages these meetings to announce and discuss the City’s intent to update its LHMP and solicit participation from stakeholder representatives. A large number of these stakeholder meetings are organized by the Riverside County Emergency Management Department (RIVCO EMD). The Riverside County EMD leads the iverside County Operational Area (OA) efforts. It’s role as lead is to support local governments response and recovery operations. The Riverside County EMD also encourages coordination across local governments and community stakeholders. Some of these efforts include: • Riverside County LHMP Steering Committee – meetings focused on maintaining, coordinating, and updating the OA Multi-Jurisdictional LHMP and the individual agency LHMP annexes. • Operational Area Planning Committee (OAPC) – The OAPC was established by the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department (EMD) as the lead County department to ensure coordinated operation area level activities and administer the Emergency Management Program on behalf of the County of Riverside, Operational Area (OA), and the Director of Emergency Services. • Riverside County Emergency Managers Association (RCEMA) – To coordinate notification and information management for the Operational Area (OA); to maximize situational awareness; and to provide a common operating picture for all emergency management participants and stakeholders. • City of Temecula Planning Commission - The Planning Commission (PC), serving as the designated statutory planning agency for the City of Temecula, reviews and makes Page|18 recommendations on topics related to subdivisions, specific plans, zone changes, plot plans and conducts legally required public hearings. • City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission - The Public/Traffic Safety Commission (PTSC) reviews and makes recommendations on topics related to speed zones, stop signs, signals, pavement markings, traffic design and engineering. • Citizen Corps Advisory Board - The Temecula Citizens Corps (TCC) Advisory Board is an important and vital volunteer group that directly supports the TCC’s efforts to be a more prepared and disaster ready volunteer group within the city. As an advisory component, the team provides mentorship, advise, guidance and support in growing the program, increasing membership, and showcasing abilities and capabilities across the region. The City of Temecula also meets quarterly with the Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (VOAD) group. The Riverside County chapter of the VOAD group is a community network of non- partisan membership organizations that serves as the forum to share knowledge and resources to help communities prepare for and recover from disasters. Further, VO AD fosters efficient delivery of available member resources to persons with unmet needs affected by disaster. At the local level, the City of Temecula meets with the faith-based organizations monthly through the Murrieta/Temecula Valley Interfaith Council. This group coordinates all faith-based organizations within the City of Temecula. The group promotes positive interfaith relationships, enhances non-violent attitudes and behavior, supports peace, and promotes goodwill in Temecula and surrounding communities. During disasters, this group supports this city not only in having volunteers, but also in providing emotional and religious support upon request. 2.4.2 Stakeholder Mitigation Related Planning Resources To ensure consistency with the region, the City of Temecula’s Office of Emergency Management ensured the Planning Team reviewed and was aware of the State of California’s Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) and several LHMP’s from surrounding urisdictions. This list included: • State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan • Riverside County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • City of Menifee Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • City of Murrieta Local Hazard Mitigation Plan • Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians Tribal Hazard Mitigation Plan • Rancho California Water District Hazard Mitigation Plan While not technically considered a mitigation plan, the Planning Team also reviewed the new draft of the City’s Emergency Operations Plan, the General Plan and Quality of Life Master Plan. The value of reviewing EOP’s is to understand how the City of Temecula and other communities within the region will respond to events and the type of equipment and facilities that they will rely on. Gaining this perspective, the Planning Team was able to incorporate these considerations into its LHMP. Although there is a concerted effort to incorporate LHMP information into the Page|19 General Plan Safety Elements, that is not always the case. A review of the Safety Elements can provide additional insight into hazards within the community and pr esent a closer tie to community-wide goals and objectives. 2.5 Public Outreach For the purposes of the LHMP, the public is defined as any person within the jurisdiction or adjacent areas, not part of the planning team, not acting in an official capacity of a recognized form or level of government. There were two (2) different Public Outreach campaigns used during the City of Temecula LHMP update process: first informing the community of the efforts to update the LHMP and the second by educating the community of hazards and mitigation process. Below is a summary of the campaigns. 2.5.1 LHMP Awareness Campaign This campaign presents the strategy for how the City of Temecula engaged the public during the LHMP update process. A significant piece of FEMA’s LHMP guidance is to ensure the “whole community” is involved. A significant element of FEMA’s “whole community” is based on the general public. The public outreach strategy worked in conjunction with the LHMP planning process and the timeline. As the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) completed critical milestones, key information was disseminated to the public for consideration and input. This information was published via the Office of Emergency Management webpage. All public outreach event s were conducted in person and within the local community. The City of Temecula held three (3) public meetings: one (1) at the start of the project; and two (2) at the end of the project. In addition to the public meetings, pop-up booths at events across the city were used in providing update information on the LHMP to the general public in keeping with the intent of including the “whole community.” In between these meetings were a series of status updates provided through the city website, keeping the general public aware of the progress and status of the project. This outreach strategy shared information about the project kickoff, hazards and potential impacts within the community, current mitigation capabilities, and proposed mitigation actions. The information was shared through presentations, status updates, and a community -based survey. Additionally, social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Nextdoor) and email blasts were used heavily to promote the update to the plan and the need for the community’s input ensuring a comprehensive and inclusive plan. The for the update process, the City of Temecula leveraged the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to engage the public. This commission holds regular, ongoing meetings with the public and its purpose was in alignment with the LHMP efforts in promoting the public safety. On Oc tober 20, 2022, the City of Temecula published the commission agenda to the public announcing the LHMP as an agenda item for the October 27th Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. Page|20 A second public outreach meeting was held on 26 Jan 23 and presented to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission to provide an overview of the draft LHMP; a meeting announcement went out on 19 Jan 23. The presentation informed the community of the LHMP planning process and the hazards identified for validation for the updated plan. The presentation provided an overview of the chapters in the LHMP, highlighting the proposed mitigation actions; inviting the public to review and submit comments on the draft LHMP. Attendance at the three Public Outreach meetings were nominal. The presentations were prepared for each meeting to inform the public on mitigation, the LHMP update planning process, and to walk the public through the LHMP content. During the meetings, some comments were received, most requesting clarification of the content provided within the LHMP presented material as well as a few questions on local topics. The draft LHMP was made available through the City of Temecula’s Office of Emergency Management website. This website also provided a function that allowed the public to submit comments on the LHMP after their review. The HMPT received zero comments during the Public Outreach review and comment period. There were no public comments received during the 30 days comment period, however, comments received from the public survey were shared with the HMPT; and revisions were incorporated into the LHMP where appropriate. The public announcements and presentations for all meetings can be found at Appendix 4. 2.5.2 Mitigation Awareness Campaign Over the last 2 years, the City of Temecula has established both regular and AdHoc meetings and events geared towards the exchange of information on preparedness and mitigation efforts. AdHoc meetings/events consist of events run by the city or other organizations that may provide opportunities to share and exchange information about hazard mitigation. The City organized and/or participated in a number of local initiatives to inform the public of hazards in the community and discussed possible mitigation actions. The City sponsors and staff information booths at local events, annual State of the City addresses, and volunteer events where the promotion of hazard mitigation is one of the components to regular outreach. The City encourages increased participation within our Citizen Corps Council, the Temecula Citizen Corps, and promotes preparedness through the Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) program of instruction. CERT training helps educate the community about hazards and trains citizens to be self-sufficient and resilient immediately following a major emergency or disaster. The Office of Emergency Management conducted a citizen survey during the LHMP process to gauge and determine the level of knowledge local citizens have about potential disasters a nd assess areas of vulnerability to various types of disasters within their individual communities. The survey further discussed the level of preparedness from each respondent to determine the readiness level of families which will lead to better engagemen t of the publics needs during emergencies. The city also leverages its social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram), media (print, broadcast), and other general public announcements to disseminate vital information about Page|21 hazards in the community, relevant programs being undertaken to safeguard the public from effects of hazards, and actions the public can take to protect themselves during an emergent event. This information can be found at Appendix 4 – Public Outreach. Page|22 This page is intentionally left blank Page|23 The purpose of this section is to present an overview of the City of Temecula, providing the Planning Team with a common understanding of the existing conditions and perspective on select aspects within the community. Gaining a common understanding of the existing conditions provides the basis on which the Planning Team can assess the impacts of hazards, as well as identify needed mitigation actions. 3.1 Location The City of Temecula is located in the most southwestern portion of Riverside County and is the first city backing up to the San Diego County line. Temecula resides ninety (90) miles from downtown Los Angeles, forty-one (41) miles from downtown Riverside, and eighty (80) miles from the U.S. – Mexico border (Figure 3.1). The City of Temecula planning areas covers approximately 30.17 square miles. Figure 3.1 – City of Temecula (2022) 3. COMMUNITY PROFILE Page|24 The City is bordered by other local jurisdictions (Figure 3.2). The County of Riverside has jurisdiction over the unincorporated land surrounding Temecula on the western and eastern sides. The City of Temecula shares a border with the City of Murrieta along Murrieta Hot Springs Road, San Diego County on the southern section of town and at the Interstate 15 Border Checkpoint and Riverside County unincorporated areas of DeLuz to the west and Temecula Valley Wine Country to the east. Figure 3.2 – Surrounding Jurisdictions (2022) 3.2 Geography The city of Temecula’s elevation is 1,010 feet above sea level and spans 30.17 square miles. It is a graben rift valley making up portions of the Elsinore Trough created over time by the major fault lines of the Elsinore Fault Zone. The city is flanked by Rainbow Valley and Gavilan Mountain to the south, De Luz and Margarita Peak to the west, the City of Murrieta, and Lake Skinner to the north and Temecula Wine Country and Cahuilla Mountain in the distance to the east. The city harbors 6.1 miles of the Interstate 15 north and south from San Diego County to San Page|25 Bernardino County. State Highway 79 flanks the city north and south ends and offers travel from Santa Ysabel to the south end of Juniper Flats. The geographical coordinates of Temecula are 33.494 deg latitude, -117.148 deg longitude, and 1,010 ft elevation. The topography within 2 miles of Temecula contains very significant variations in elevation, with a maximum elevation change of 915 feet and an average elevation above sea level of 1,179 feet. Within 10 miles contains very significant variations in elevation (4,055 feet). Within 50 miles also contains extreme variations in elevation (11,490 feet). The area within 2 miles of Temecula is covered by shrubs (56%), artificial surfaces (31%), and grassland (10%), within 10 miles by shrubs (69%) and grassland (18%), and within 50 miles by shrubs (52%) and water (18%). Figure 3.3 – Physical Features Surrounding the City of Temecula (2022) There are two (2) principal streams/creeks that drain into the City of Te mecula, each present identifiable hazards at peak flows: • Temecula Creek – The Temecula Creek, formerly known as the Temecula iver, runs 32.6 miles through southern  iverside County, California, nited States, past the rural Page|26 communities of Sage and Aguanga, and ending 0.5 miles southeast of the original city center of Temecula. The creek is filled with boulders and is typically dry and sandy. It is a relatively undeveloped coastal-draining watershed. Until the 1920s, water flowed in Temecula Creek year-round. • Murrieta Creek - The Murrieta Creek runs 13 miles southeasterly through southwestern  iverside County, through the cities of Wildomar, Murrieta, and Temecula, ending 0.5 miles southeast of the city center of Temecula, where it has its confluence with Temecula Creek and forms the head of the Santa Margarita iver. Murrieta Creek drains over 220 square miles. The creek has several minor tributaries, including flows from Lake Skinner whose outlet is Tucalota Creek below the reservoir, which then flows to Santa Gertrudis Creek, then Murrieta Creek. The Santa Margarita River, one of the last free-flowing rivers in Southern California extends 30.9 miles from the confluence of Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek and is formed as a river where the creeks meet.  It flows southwest through the 5 miles of the Temecula Canyon at the south end of the Santa Ana Mountains. Along its lower 10 miles the river forms a large floodplain as it crosses Marine Corps Installations-West (MCI-West) Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton (MCB Camp Pendleton). It enters the Gulf of Santa Catalina on the Pacific Ocean approximately 3 miles northwest of the City of Oceanside. There are three (3) primary reservoirs that surround the City of Temecula that possess the ability to catastrophically flood the city along the north, west, and southern sections of the city limits. These are: • Vail Lake Reservoir – Vail Lake sits to the east of Temecula City at a surface elevation of 1,460’. The lake has a holding capacity of 45,000 acre-feet but due to drought currently holds 1/3 of its capacity. Temecula Creek and Wilson Creek provide inflow, and the lake outflows back into Temecula Creek. • Lake Skinner Reservoir - 10 miles northeast of the city at a surface elevation of 1,500 ‘. The lake has a capacity of 44,200 acre-feet. The lake is supplied by the Colorado River Aqueduct and the State Water Project and outflows into Tucalota Creek and the Santa Margarita River. • Diamond Valley Lake - Northeast of Temecula in unincorporated Hemet is one of the largest reservoirs in Southern California. The lake has a surface elevation of 1,748’ and a capacity of 800,000 acre-feet. The reservoir is supplied by the State Water Project and supplies potable water to the Metropolitan Water District customers. Page|27 3.3 History Temecula is one of the most historic communities in Southern California. Rancho California was incorporated into a city on the 1st of December in 1989 and the citizens themselves voted to officially name their city "Temecula". Today, Temecula is a vibrant and healthy City, culturally diverse and encompassing all the elements that represent a high quality of life: built and natural environment, economic and educational opportunities, recreation, shopping and entertainment resources, and the ability to have a safe and healthy lifestyle. Yet despite such rapid growth, the City of Temecula retains a sense of its past and a connection to its history. Since incorporation, Temecula has grown from a small bedroom community to a regional center of business and economic growth, which continues to prioritize a high quality of life for its 110,000 residents. In its 30+ years as a City, the Temecula City Government, in partnership with residents, has set high standards for excellence and clear priorities of safety that have made Temecula a great place to live, work and play. The City’s approach to safety continues to evolve to meet the everchanging needs of its residents and businesses as exampled by the creation of the City of Temecula comprehensive Emergency Management Program and the update to our Local Hazard Mitigation Plan so that Temecula may be a well-prepared and resilient City in the event of natural and other disasters. Sustaining a safe community is the City’s most important obligation and number one priority. 3.4 Climate Temecula’s climate is typical of Southern California inland areas. esidents of the City experience hot, arid summers and mostly clear winters that are long, cool, and partly cloudy. The temperature typically varies from 41 to 89 degrees Fahrenheit and is rarely below 34 degrees Fahrenheit or above 96 degrees Fahrenheit. (Table 3.1) Table 3.1 – Average Temperatures – City of Temecula (2022) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Max Avg. Temp 66°F 66°F 68°F 72°F 76°F 82°F 87°F 88°F 85°F 79°F 71°F 66°F Min Avg. Temp 42°F 44°F 46°F 49°F 54°F 58°F 62°F 63°F 60°F 54°F 47°F 42°F Precipitation (inches) 2.3″ 2.8″ 1.8″ 0.7″ 0.2″ 0.1″ 0.1″ 0.2″ 0.2″ 0.5″ 1.0″ 1.8″ Page|28 3.4.1 Precipitation and Rainfall Precipitation - A wet day is one with at least 0.04 inches of liquid or liquid -equivalent precipitation. The chance of wet days in Temecula varies throughout the year. The wetter season lasts 4.4 months, from November 21 to April 4, with a greater than 11% chance of a given day being a wet day. The month with the most wet days in Temecula is February, with an average of 5.6 days with at least 0.04 inches of precipitation. The drier season lasts 7.6 months, from April 4 to November 21. The month with the fewest wet days in Temecula is June, with an average of 0.3 days with at least 0.04 inches of precipitation. Among wet days, we distinguish between those that experience rain alone, snow alone, or a mixture of the two. The month with the most days of rain alone in Temecula is February, with an average of 5.6 days. Based on this categorization, the most common form of precipitation throughout the year is rain alone, with a peak probability of 21% on February 21. Rainfall - To show variation within the months and not just the monthly totals, we show the rainfall accumulated over a sliding 31-day period centered around each day of the year. Temecula experiences significant seasonal variation in monthly rainfall. The rainy period of the year lasts for 6.2 months, from October 18 to April 24, with a sliding 31-day rainfall of at least 0.5 inches. The month with the most rain in Temecula is February, with an average rainfall of 2.8 inches. The rainless period of the year lasts for 5.8 months, from April 24 to October 18. The mon th with the least rain in Temecula is June, with an average rainfall of 0.1 inches 3.4.2 Wind - The average hourly wind speed in Temecula experiences mild seasonal variation over the course of the year. The windier part of the year lasts for 7.2 months, from November 13 to June 18, with average wind speeds of more than 5.5 miles per hour. The windiest month of the year in Temecula is April, with an average hourly wind speed of 6.2 miles per hour. The calmer time of year lasts for 4.8 months, from June 18 to November 13. The calmest month of the year in Temecula is August, with an average hourly wind speed of 4.7 miles per hour . Figure 3.4 – Average Wind Speeds City of Temecula (2022) Page|29 3.5 Demographics According to the U. S. Census Bureau 2021 estimates, the total population of Riverside County is approximately 2,458,395 people. The ma ority of the County’s population resides in the Western and Southwestern portions of the county. The County’s population has grown by approximately 228,544 people (10.5 %) since the 2010 population of 2,189,641. The population of the City of Temecula is estimated to be 110,394 (U.S. Census, 2021 estimate), slightly down from the 2020 estimate of 112,512. The City of Temec ula’s population represents approximately 4.5 % of the population residing within iverside County. The City of Temecula’s population has increased approximately 9.8 % since 2010 however, the overall population has steadily decreased over the past three (3) years. The historical population estimates for the City of Temecula are shown in Figure 3.5. Figure 3.5 – Historical Population Estimates for the City of Temecula, 2012 -2022 Below are some additional relevant statistics from the 2021 U.S. Census estimate for the City of Temecula. • Persons under 18 years: 29.1% • Persons 65 years and over: 10.5% • Persons between the years of 18 and 65: 39.6% • Persons speaking a language other than English at home: 23.8% • Persons over the age of 25 that are High School graduates: 94.1% • Persons that have attained a bachelor’s degree or higher: 35% • Persons under the age of 65 with a disability: 6.6% • Median household income: $98,631 • Living below the poverty level: 7.2% Page|30 In addition to the above information, the HMPT reviewed information from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). In 2008, the SCAG initiated the Local Profiles which provided a variety of demographic, economic, education, housing, and tr ansportation information about each member jurisdiction and is updated every two years. The SCAG region includes six (6) counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) and 191 incorporated cities. Additionally, the SCAG region is a major hub of global economic activity and considered the nation’s gateway for international trade with two of the largest ports in the nation. Figure 3.6 below is some information from the SCAG Local Profile for the City of Temecula (2020): Figure 3.6 – SCAG Housing Statistics, Temecula 2020 3.6 Economy According to the SCAG report (2017), the total number of jobs within the City of Temecula is 56,994. The total number of jobs in Temecula reflects an 18% increase from 2007 (Figure 3.7 [ Page|31 2022]). A more detailed breakdown of the jobs in the City of Temecula is reflected in Figure 3.8 (2022). Below is a summary of some of the larger losses in job sectors since 2007. • Manufacturing: 1,285 jobs in 2017 (20.1% decrease) • Construction: 1,629 jobs in 2017 (37.2% decrease) • Professional/Management: 1,380 jobs in 2017 (20.3% decrease) Figure 3.7 – Total Number of Jobs in the City of Temecula 2007-2017 Figure 3.8 – Total Number of Jobs in the City of Temecula by Industry 2007-2017 Page|32 As presented in the Comprehensive Annual Financial eport, the City of Temecula’s economy is based largely on the service and trade sectors (health care, retail trade, real estate) and light manufacturing. From 2007 to 2017, education jobs increased by 4% while retail was responsible for the largest job sector growth and accounting for 17% of the total jobs within the City. Since the last update, the vacancy rate for industrial and manufacturing space has declined significantly as the City has expanded its manufacturing and industrial base. During the height of CO ID, the city’s unemployment rate rose to a staggering 9.1% in 2020, up from 3.2% in 2019. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (Aug 2022), Temecula’s unemployment rate has dropped back down to 3%, a change of 46.43% from the year before (Figure 3.9). Figure 3.9 – Unemployment Rate, City of Temecula (2022) 3.6.1 Major Employers in Temecula and Surrounding Vicinity Major industries with headquarters or division located within the City’s boundaries (or in close proximity) include computer technology manufacturing, financial and insurance institutions, educational institutions, medical, and warehouse distribution centers as presented in Table 3.2. Table 3.2 – Major Employers (2022) Employer Number of Employees City Temecula Unified School District 3,000 Abbott Laboratories 1,500 Temecula Valley Hospital 1,045 Infineon Technologies 566 Walmart 538 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0%HundredsCity of Temecula Unemployment Rate 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Page|33 Employer Number of Employees City Costco Wholesale 520 Southwest Traders Inc. 484 Milgard Manufacturing Inc. 468 The Scotts Company 456 FFF Enterprises 366 3.7 Land Use Land use within the City of Temecula is guided by the General Plan, Zoning Laws, and Municipal Building Codes. The Land Use element of the General Plan supports opportunities to create a cohesive and attractive image for each district and neighborhood. The City of Temecula’s Land Use Plan includes three (3) related parts: 1) description of allowed land uses; 2) overlay districts; and 3) the location of allowed land use. Table 3.3 provides a summary of the permitted Land Uses and the maximum density. Table 3.3 – Land Use Categories (2022) Land Use Maximum Density Residential Hillside 0.1 dwelling unit/gross acre Rural 0.2 dwelling unit/gross acre Very Low 0.4 dwelling unit/gross acre Low 2.0 dwelling unit/gross acre Low Medium 6.0 dwelling unit/gross acre Medium 12.0 dwelling unit/gross acre High 20.0 dwelling unit/gross acre Office, Commercial, Industrial Neighborhood 0.4 floor to area ratio Community 1.0 floor to area ratio Highway/Tourist 1.0 floor to area ratio Service 1.5 floor to area ratio Professional Offices 1.0 floor to area ratio Industrial Industrial Park 1.5 floor to area ratio Public/Institutional and Open Space Use Public/Institutional 0.7 floor to area ratio Vineyards/Agriculture 0.2 dwelling unit/gross acre/0.1 floor to area ratio Open Space 0.1 floor to area ratio Tribal Trust N/A Overlay Designation Mixed Use Varies Page|34 3.7.1 Potential Land Use The Land Use in the City of Temecula consists of the following categories: Agriculture; Commercial; Industrial; Office; Residential; Public/Institutional; Open Space; and mixed use. As presented in the City of Temecula General Plan, the proposed distribution of the land uses within the City limits can be seen in Figure 3.10. Figure 3.10 – General Plan Land Use Map (2012) Page|35 According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the breakdown of Land Use in the Planning Area (Figure 3.11) includes Residential (41%); Commercial (21%); Industrial (23%); Public/Institutional (13%); and Overlay (2%). Figure 3.11 – Land Use Distribution (2022) Residential 41% Commercial 21% Industrial 23% Public 13% Overlay 2% Residential Commercial Industrial Public Overlay Page|36 3.7.2 Existing Land Use While the General Plan Land Use illustrates the potential build out of the City, Figure 3.12 depicts the current, existing Land Use within Temecula. Figure 3.12 – Existing Land Use Map (2020) The LHMP also leveraged information from a city-sponsored GIS project. The GIS project improved model data to reflect what was currently “on -the-ground” and use it for flood and earthquake loss estimation analysis (damage) and exposure assessments for wildfire. Table 3.4 presents the “improved” data for the City of Temecula. Page|37 Table 3.4 – Building Stock Inventory – City of Temecula (2022) Building Stock Building Count Building Replacement Value ($1,000) Residential 30,969 $13.43 Billion Commercial 940 $4.056 Billion Industrial 2,455 $697.01 Million Vacant 485 $234.95 Million Other 61 $387.06 Million TOTAL 34,910 * Mfg. Housing 196 $16.68 Million Precast Concrete 719 Reinforced Masonry 9 Steel (Pre-Engineered) 24 Steel (Fireproof) 22 URM >5 Wood Frame (Other) 483 Wood Frame (SFR) 31,242 Undisclosed 175 TOTAL 32,875 * * Totals differ based on how units are counted in differing data sets 3.7.3 Development Trends The residential growth of the City of Temecula will continue to expand as there are many people attracted to the City and the amenities it offers within the community. Steady growth has occurred within the City of Temecula since the adopted 2017 LHMP. As anticipated, light commercial growth will follow residential growth in these parts of the city, such as along the Jefferson Corridor. Heavy commercial and industrial growth will continue to develop along the western portions of the city, along the base of the hills making up the Santa Margarita Ecological Preserve and along Interstate 15 and Highway 79. All development occurring over the past few years was constructed in accordance with all local land use, building codes, zoning, and environmental requirements, and applicable State and Federal regulations. Because of this growth and rigorous project review over the past five (5) years, there have been no changes to the community’s vulnerability. Because much of the City of Temecula has already been developed , no major growth is anticipated over the next five (5) years. Projected development is expected to center around the Jefferson Corridor and the Promenade Mall. The City has prepared specific plans for both of these areas to ensure measured and safe development. The City anticipates adding more than 4,000 housing units by 2028, which will increase the population by more than 12,000 residents. Many of these units will be pedestrian oriented multi-family housing. Page|38 According to the 2005 General Plan (currently under revision), the projected population at buildout in the City of Temecula is approximately 118,900 persons. Buildout projections in the update to the General Plan only factor in the potential maximums based on Land Use and Zoning designations; it does not consider other factors that may limit growth (e.g., downturn in the economy, building material shortages, etc.). We must acknowledge that there will be a slight difference in the text above since the calculations were based upon the 2005 plan. Based on current population with the anticipated increase in residents by 2028, this will push the number upwards of 122,000. 3.8 Key Assets A subset of the general building stock are key buildings the City will rely on when responding t o and recovering from disaster events. Because of the role and importance of these facilities, the City needs to ensure the facilities are maintained and will be functional during and after disasters. Also, part of these key assets are systems and equipment used to perform certain functions and/or operations. The list of key assets includes, but are not limited to: Police Stations, Fire Stations, City Hall, Water facilities, Hospitals/Medical facilities, Community Centers, Maintenance Yards, Mass Care & Shelter Sites, Libraries and Schools. A list of key assets can be found in Appendix 5. Page|39 The purpose of this section is to capture the different resources available to the City of Temecula in support of mitigation. In an effort to efficiently demonstrate these resources, this section has been organized by: Personnel Resources; Mitigation Governance Resources; Technical Resources; and Fiscal Resources. 4.1 Personnel Resources This sub section demonstration the City of Temecula’s capability to dedicate and or assign, long- term or short-term, workforce to mitigation efforts. There are four (4) primary ways that the City of Temecula can provide personnel resources: directly from the City of Temecula workforce; through contracts and volunteer organization; through mutual aid; and through existing partnerships. 4.1.1 Government The City of Temecula is a full service, general law city. The major services provided include Police, Fire, Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Engineering, Public Works, and Community Development. The City is governed by a five-member City Council, who also chair several Boards, Committees, and Commissions. The City Council is supported by the City Clerk’s Office, the City Treasurer, and the City Manager. The City Manager oversees the City Manager’s Office staff, Assistant City Manager, Deputy City Manager (Community Development), City Clerk, Finance, Police and Fire. The Assistant City Manager oversees the Directors of Community Services, Human Resources & Risk Management, and Information Technology. The organization structure of the City of Temecula is depicted at Figures 4.1 and 4.2. 4. CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT Page|40 Figure 4.1 - City of Temecula Organizational Structure (1) [2022] Figure 4.2 - City of Temecula Organizational Structure (2) [2022] Legend Blue: City Manager Orange: City Staff Red: CALFire (Contract) Green: Riverside County Sheriff’s Department (Contract) While each department plays a role with regard to emergency preparedness and response, not all will have a direct role in mitigation. This section demonstrates the City of Temecula’s capability Page|41 to dedicate and/or assign workforce to mitigation efforts. Th ere are five (5) primary ways the City of Temecula can provide personnel resources: Directly from the City of Temecula government workforce, through contracts, through volunteer organizations, through mutual aid agreements, and through partnerships. The City of Temecula ‘s ma or services include Police, Fire, Water, Wastewater, Solid Waste, Engineering, Public works and Community Development. The city is governed by a five-member City Council and the appointment to the position of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempo re is made on rotating basis among all Council Members. The City Manager oversees the Office of the City Manager Staff, Development Services, Management Services, Municipal Utilities and Engineering, Facilities and Community Services. The City of Temecula has established its first Office of Emergency Management nestled under the Human Resources and Risk Management Department. Below is a summary of the city departments and their roles: • Office of the City Clerk - The City Clerk’s office of the City of Temecula is committed to ethically serving the needs of the citizens of our community by: Bridging internal and external communication pathways, enhancing the public’s trust in local government, ensuring the integrity of the participatory process, providing equa l access to open and transparent government. o Election and Voter Information -The City of Temecula is a general law city with a five-member legislative body. Each of the five City Council Members are directly elected by the registered voters of their district. The positions of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore are ceremonial in nature and not directly elected. The City Council selects the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore amongst themselves and the positions typically serve a calendar year. o Redistricting Information and Archives -The City Council completed its redistricting process on March 8, 2022, selecting Map B below. This webpage is being preserved for 10 years for informational purposes pursuant to AB 849 (2019) and AB 1276 (2020) codified in Elections Code Section 21600 et seq. o Public Records and Municipal Code – Requests for public records, Fair Political Practices Commission Forms, and the Municipal Code can be accessed or made online and in person. o Public Notices and Comment Opportunities- Public comments for City Council meetings may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card or submitting electronically to CouncilComments@TemeculaCA.gov for inclusion into the record pursuant to the rules outlined on the agenda. Notices for upcoming public hearing dates are published on the city website. • Office of the City Manager - The City Manager Department serves as the City's executive office responsible to the City Council for implementing their priorities and objectives and effectively delivering exceptional services, projects, and programs to the citizens of Page|42 Temecula. The City Manager is responsible for implementing all City Council policies, as guided by the Quality-of-Life Master Plan (QLMP), overseeing the preparation and administration of a balanced annual budget, providing organizational leadership to City staff and operations. o City Attorney - The mission of the City Attorney’s Office is to provide quality, timely, and cost-effective legal analysis, opinion, and advice to the City’s elected officials, departments, appointed commissions and boards on a broad range of legal, administrative, legislative, and procedural matters, including application of constitutional, statutory, administrative, and local government law. The City Attorney’s Office strives to effectively provide timely research, analysis, evaluation, and drafting of legal and other documents necessary to the accomplishment of the City’s municipal functions and goals. The City Attorney’s mission includes representation of the city in judicial, administrative, and appellate proceedings in an efficient and cost-effective manner. o Community Service Funding Grants - The City's annual nonprofit organization grant program entitled Community Service Funding has historically awarded up to $5,000 per nonprofit organization, for a total of $100,000 budgeted annually. This Fiscal Year, beginning July 1, 2022, and next Fiscal Year, beginning July 1, 2023, the program will be revitalized as Community Service Funding - Reinvestment in Temecula and the budgeted amount will be increased by $1 million to $1.1 million each year, for a total of $2.2 million over two years. The program will be administered by the City Manager's Office and eligible nonprofit organizations are invited to apply for a grant up to $50,000 each year to fund services or programs that serve Temecula residents. o City News and Updates - The City Manager publishes a monthly e-newsletters to provide brief, informative updates intended to keep Temecula residents and businesses engaged with City Hall, and informed about current citywide projects, programs, and events. o Citizen Survey -The Community Opinion Survey is a study designed to provide a statistically reliable understanding of citizen satisfaction, priorities, and concerns on a variety of services that the city provides. The survey results help to ensure that the City’s priorities and goals remain aligned with citizen input o Economic Development - Our mission is to create a wide spectrum of job opportunities for Temecula residents by expanding the City's economic base and increasing local economic activity, and to generate new tax revenues for essential public service by expanding the City's tax base. o Public Information - In person, on paper and digitally, the City of Temecula Office of Public Information Team is committed to disseminating timely and factual information to all Temecula residents and businesses, the Press, and all other parties while adhering to our Core Values as outlined in the Quality-of-Life Master Plan. Page|43 ▪ Temecula TV: Channel 3-The Temecula TV Program is a comprehensive effort focused on providing public information in a timely manner as well as creating opportunities to educate our residents about local government, upcoming projects, and services. ▪ Social Networking - Find out the latest information about City of Temecula initiatives, opportunities, and fun things to do in the heart of Southern California Wine Country. ▪ Inside Temecula Newsletter - Annual newsletter published by the City of Temecula and mailed to residents and businesses within the City of Temecula. ▪ City’s Mobile App - The City of Temecula App is designed to enhance citizen engagement by streamlining access to City information. In addition to providing information, the City of Temecula App allows access to City services. Residents will have the ability to report non-emergency issues to the City at any time of the day or night. Issues such as potholes, graffiti, homeless concerns and more can be reported quickly and easily using photographs, location, and other information about the issue. Once the issue is submitted, staff is notified, and the resident can track the status of their issue through the app. • Community Development - Community Development is a multi-disciplinary department providing a range of planning and development services to appointed boards, citizens , city departments, commissions, elected officials. This is accomplished by promoting positive community and economic development within the city and includes adequate affordable housing and providing social service programs. o Affordable Housing - The City of Temecula has a variety of affordable housing opportunities for all economic segments of the community. By partnering with government agencies, non-profit organizations, and private property owners, we work to create safe and affordable housing for all residents of our community. o Building and Safety - The Building and Safety Division is responsible for the administration and enforcement of all applicable regulatory clearances, codes and standards, fees, plan review, inspections and application of City, State, and Federal laws and ordinances. o Planning Department - The primary goal of the Planning Department is to implement orderly and compatible development which creates livable neighborhoods, supports economic development, and sustains a high quality of life for Temecula’s citizens. The Planning Department is responsible for zoning, land use entitlements, current and long range planning, the General Plan, and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Page|44 o CEQA - The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is a state law that establishes a procedure for all California public agencies such as the City of Temecula for evaluating the environmental effects of a proposed project. o Long Range Planning - On June 27, 2012, Governor Brown signed into law Assembly Bill 1484 (AB 1484), a budget trailer bill that made substantial changes to the redevelopment agency dissolution process implemented by Assembly Bill 1X 26. One of the key components of AB 1484 is the requirement that all successor agencies develop a Long-Range Property Management Plan that governs the disposition and use of the former non-housing redevelopment agency properties. o SARDA - In June 2011, ABXI 26 dissolved all California redevelopment agencies, effective October 1, 2011. This legislation prevents redevelopment agencies, such as the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, from engaging in new activities. It also outlined a process for winding down the Agency's financial affairs. o Code Enforcement - The City of Temecula Code Enforcement team works with residents, property owners, business owners, and other partners to mitigate and resolve negative impacts in our community. Through voluntary compliance and cooperation, our Code Enforcement team works to address potential issues and ultimately make Temecula an even better place to live. o Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) - The City of Temecula receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) each year. CDBG funds are provided by the federal government to help people with extremely low, low, and moderate incomes and those who may be particularly vulnerable (for example people with disabilities). Assistance provided by CDBG funds is targeted toward affordable housing, establishing suitable living environments, and expanding opportunities for lower income residents. CDBG funds are broken down into three categories: 1. Capital Improvements – physical improvements to the private or public built environment to support low income and protected populations (e.g., people with disabilities). 2. Public Service Allocation – funds to support other organizations or nonprofits (known as public service providers) that serve low income and/or protected populations. 3. Administrative Funds – funds to administer the CDBG program and enforce the federal government’s stringent regulatory requirements . CDBG funds follow a regular cycle and process that ensures analysis, data collection, community involvement, transparency, and performance measurement. o Development Reports - Building Permits Issued, Planning Activity Report. Page|45 o Fees - Budget Management, Business Licenses, Debt Management, Fees, Financial Reports, Property Tax, Purchasing & Contract Administration, Transient Occupancy Tax. o Inspections - Building Inspections, Fire Inspections, Land Development Inspections, Planning/Landscape Inspections. o Land Development - The Land Development Division in the Department of Public Works provides for the review and engineering approval of all proposed private developments and residential/commercial subdivisions within City limits to ensure compliance with City and engineering standards, codes, ordinances, policies, and procedures as well as all applicable state and feder al regulations. o Planning - The primary goal of the Planning Department is to implement orderly and compatible development which creates livable neighborhoods, supports economic development, and sustains a high quality of life for Temecula’s citizens. o Sustainability - Temecula's Sustainability Plan was adopted by the City Council on June 22, 2010. This plan is a comprehensive program that includes 8 areas of focus: Air Resources, Community Outreach, Energy, Green Buildings, Open Space, Transportation, Waste Management, Water Resources. • Community Services - The Community Services Department is dedicated to providing an award-winning complement of recreational and cultural programs, community and human services and special events activities aimed at enhancing the high quality of life for our youth, teens, adults, seniors, and special needs population - We create community through people, parks, and programs. • Finance - The Finance Department serves as the City’s fiscal custodian and is responsible for managing the Accounting, Purchasing and Budgeting operations. The Department consists of 4 divisions: o Budget Management o Finance Support Services ▪ Debt Administration ▪ Procurement o Financial Reporting o Revenue Management o Budget Management - The Annual Operating Budget is developed after a considerable review process. Departmental budget submittals are prepared and reviewed by line-item in connection with projected revenues. Detailed measurable performance objectives are developed utilizing a unified set of Citywide strategic goals. Expenditure and 5-year revenue projections are developed to identify the future impacts of proposed staffing and program changes, as well as the impact of proposed capital improvement projects. The Page|46 result is that this document is a conservative, balanced budget that provides for quality services while effectively utilizing available resources. ▪ The CIP Budget document is to serve as a planning tool, which coordinates the financing and scheduling of major projects undertaken by the city. The CIP Budget document has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This document is dynamic and, consequently, must be revised annually to address changing needs, priorities, and financial conditions. The capital improvements pre sented in this document are the City’s ma or pro ects, which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are generally non-recurring. These projects include land and right of way acquisition, design, construction or rehabilitation of public buildings or facilities, public infrastructure design and construction, park design and construction, and redevelopment projects. o Business Licenses and Property Taxes - Guides and manages the process of obtaining a business license and/or paying property taxes in Temecula. o Debt Management - It is the mission of the Debt Management Division to effectively manage all of the City, Redevelopment Agency, and Temecula Public Financing Authority debt obligations by investing available funds responsibly, evaluating refinancing opportunities to save the City money and lower taxes on its citizens, and to provide outstanding customer service to all property owners, developers, and consultants while ensuring that all requirements are met for all debt obligations administered by the City and its legal authorities. o Financial Reports - Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) - The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) contains information that can be utilized to evaluate the City’s financial condition and its operational and fiscal accountability for the year. The ACFR consists of a comprehensive summary of the City’s finances and other relevant information for the audit year, including economic overviews, financial analyses, financial statement note disclosures, budgetary and other compliance schedules, and other statistical data. The ACFR is prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the nited States of America and is audited by the City’s independent auditors. The City participates in the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program established by the Government Finance Officers Association. This is the highest recognition Program in the area of government accounting and financial reporti ng. The City has received the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting annually since fiscal year 1991. Page|47 • Fire Department (CALFire/Riverside County Fire Department – Contracted Services) - The Temecula Fire Department is dedicated to the protection of life, property, and the environment. This is accomplished by following a comprehensive emergency service response program that utilizes a highly trained work force, progressive technology, modern equipment, and responsible fiscal management. The Temecula Fire Department is comprised of one (1) Division Chief, two (2) Battalion Chiefs and 60 firefighting personnel that serve from five (5) fire stations located within the city limits. Plan review and inspection services for development and construction throughout the city is provided by six (6) Fire Prevention staff members located at City Hall. There are 3 Administrative staff members that provide support for the implementation and management of the Temecula Fire Department. The Temecula Division encompasses 3 Riverside County Fire Department stations for a total of 8 stations within the Temecula Division. o Community Programs -The City of Temecula's Fire Department works in cooperation with other organizations to bring its citizens the most current fire safety information. o Fire Prevention - The mission of the Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau is to preserve and enhance the quality of life for the citizens of Temecula through the application of a comprehensive fire and hazard prevention program. This mission is carried out through the pursuit of the following goals: Conduct public information and education programs that emphasize fire and life safety and have a strong focus on fire prevention. Ensure a reasonable degree of life safety exists in all buildings through enforcement of applicable codes, regulations, and standards. o Public Training Opportunities 1. CPR/AED Course - This course teaches Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), the use of an Automated External Defibrillator (AED), and relief of Foreign Body Airway Obstruction (FBAO) for adult, child, and infant victims. 2. First Aid Classes - The Heartsaver First Aid course, developed using the same evidence-based process as all American Heart Association courses, provides training in basic first-aid procedures (including the first-aid skills recommended by OSHA) in a format that can be delivered in a single day. Also offered are elective modules in CPR, AED, and environmental emergencies. 3. Health Care Provider CPR-The Basic Life Support (BLS) for Healthcare Providers Course is designed to provide a wide variety of healthcare professionals the ability to recognize several life-threatening emergencies, proved CPR, use an AED, and relieve choking in a safe, timely and effective manner. 4. Pediatric First Aid-The City is pleased to offer American Heart Association, Heartsaver Pediatric First Aid courses. This class is designed to meet the regulatory and credentialed training requirements for childcare workers in all 50 states. Page|48 • Human Resources - The Human Resources Department is responsible for administering Human Resources policies, procedures, and practices. They provide vision and leadership to promote an environment that values excellence, diversity, creativity, and productivity at all levels of the organization. o Risk Management Division - The mission of the Risk Management Division is to identify, assess, and manage the impacts of operational risk on city government business by having policies in place to protect City personnel, property, and liabilities. o Office of Emergency Management - The Office of Emergency Management provides Emergency Management (EM) services to the City of Temecula through the provision of an Emergency Manager. The Emergency Manager is responsible for the development of the City’s disaster plans, disaster training and exercise program while providing direct oversight of the City’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC). • Information Technology & Support Services - The Information Technology department serves our community by researching, developing, implementing, and supporting effective and innovative use of technology through teamwork, collaboration, innovation, and accountability to our departmental partners. Responsibilities include planning, developing, implementing, supporting the technology systems and networks and use of Media Services to increase community involvement throughout the City of Temecula. The IT Department is divided into the following 6 divisions: o Enterprise Application Services (EAS) o Geographic Information Systems (GIS) o Media Services o Network Infrastructure o Tech Support and Support Services • Temecula Police ( u h ff’ – Contracted Services) - The Department employs officers at the rate of about 1 Officer per 1,063 residents. In addition to the main station, there are two substations available to the public for police services at the Promenade Mall Substation, and a second location in Old Town. The Department has a Promenade Mall Team, Traffic Team, Investigation Bureau, SET/Gang team, a Homeless Outreach Team, School Resource Officers, Volunteers, and a METRO Team. • Public Works - The mission of the Public Works Department is to provide quality services that support the infrastructure demands of the City of Temecula and enhance the safety, welfare and aesthetic environment of the residents, businesses, and visitors. This is Page|49 accomplished through the development and maintenance of City streets, sidewalks, traffic systems, bike lanes, parks, buildings, trails, and drainage facilities; professional engineering oversight of public and private improvement projects; and implemen tation of erosion/sediment controls and storm water quality measures. o Administration & Special Projects - The Administration and Special Projects Program within the Public Works Department provides coordination with other agencies and organizations involved in transportation, flood control, sanitary sewer, and water distribution. ▪ Responsibilities: • Representing the City at technical advisory committee meetings involving the Riverside County Transportation Commission and the Western Riverside Council of Governments on issues concerning federal funding, air quality, and congestion management • Coordinating all programs within the Public Works Department • Being involved in the Water Planning Task Force, various Santa Margarita Watershed groups, and the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee • Tracking the division budget o Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) - The Capital Improvement Division (CIP) administers the City's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program, which consists of projects for the construction of City facilities, roads, traffic signals, parks, and community centers. The primary sources of funding for the CIP are Developer Impact Fees (DIF), Measure A, General Fund, and grants from various sources, including local, state, and federal agencies. ▪ The CIP Division is responsible for the project planning, environmental documentation, design, and property acquisition, for streets, bridges, facilities, and park projects. The Division also manages the bidding process for Capital Improvement Projects, as well as construction inspection duties. All functions are done in coordination with various agencies, including utility companies, other departments with the city, Caltrans, and other governmental agencies. o Land Development - The Land Development Division in the Department of Public Works provides for the review and engineering approval of all proposed private developments and residential/commercial subdivisions within City limits to ensure compliance with City and engineering standards, codes, ordinances, policies, and procedures as well as all applicable state and federal regulations. ▪ The responsibilities of the Land Development Division include a vast range of engineering reviews and inspections ranging from “conceptual de sign” engineering reviews to ultimately, Public Works inspectors’ clearance for Page|50 issuance of a certificate of occupancy. These engineering responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following: • Administer the Land Development program • Collect, and ultimately release, the required securities for work within private developments and public rights-of-way • Inspect all private developments during construction • Issue Land Development permits including grading, haul route and encroachment permits • Provide complete and comprehensive Land Development comments (i.e., engineering, water quality, etc.) during the Development Services’ Pre-Application process • Provide complete and comprehensive Public Works’ Conditions of Approval for private developments • Provide excellent customer service to the general public regarding Land Development concerns and • Review, plan check and recommend approval of all private projects (including commercial, industrial, and residential developments, tract/parcel maps, legal documentation, etc.) within the City ▪ The Land Development Division strives to accomplish these responsibilities for the benefit of the community, local businesses, neighborhoods, and its residents, with minimal disruptions and inconveniences. o Traffic Engineering - The Traffic Engineering Division is responsible for day-to-day traffic operations, safety issues, and future transportation needs. ▪ Responsibilities • Collecting and analyzing traffic volume data • Establishing future traffic signal priorities • Maintaining traffic devices inventories • Monitoring traffic and implementing changes from traffic operation center • Monitoring, maintaining, and adjusting timing of existing traffic signals • Performing speed surveys • Responding to citizens' requests for traffic control devices • Reviewing accident reports • Reviewing all traffic control plans for construction zones • Reviewing all traffic signal, signing, and striping plans • Reviewing private development plans for traffic impacts and mitigation measures • Technical support of the Public Traffic/Safety Commission Page|51 o TRIP Report - The purpose of the TRIP Report (Traffic Restrictions in Progress) is to advise citizens of conditions affecting traffic flow within the City. o Water Quality & Storm Water - The City of Temecula is committed to improving water quality by implementing programs that systematically reduce and eliminate pollutants from urban runoff before reaching our local creeks. These creeks historically receive untreated runoff through numerous storm-drain systems throughout the city. Flows from each creek drain into the Santa Margarita River, which ultimately discharges into the Pacific Ocean. 4.1.2 Contractors The City of Temecula is able to hire contract employees. A contract employee is an individual retained by the City for a predetermined time and price. Benefits of hiring contract employees include: • Ability to hire workers for short-term projects, on an as needed basis • Ability to hire highly skilled individuals for which there is no one in -house qualifications o Little to no downtime as noticed with onboarding new staff • Lower overhead operating costs o Do not need to pay taxes (social security, workers compensation) or provide benefits (unemployment, health, sick leave, vacation time or retirement) o Usually do not need to provide office space or equipment Disadvantages of hiring contract employees include: • May work for several employers simultaneously and may not be available when needed • Integrating with City staff can be difficult because of remote working and unfamiliar with city organization and resources 4.1.3 Volunteers The City of Temecula has the ability to leverage volunteer workers. A volunteer worker generally means anyone who agrees to work for free, California labor laws narrow in on a more specific definition of a volunteer. According to California Labor Code Section 1720.4, which defines volunteering in California’s labor law, an individual must perform services freely and without coercion for a civic, humanitarian, or charitable purpose to be considered a volunteer. The legally volunteer, an individual must offer his/her services to a public agency or non -profit organization. Businesses may not legally utilize volunteers. California Labor Law permits the extension of workers’ compensation to volunteers during their time in service. Workers’ compensation is a type of insurance that covers employees in the event of industrial or occupational injury. Often, public agencies will grant volunteers insurance protection under workers’ compensation to help encourage volunteering and avoid the potential for lawsuits. In order to be deemed an employee for workers’ compensation, the organization – Page|52 whether public or private – usually must declare a volunteer as such prior to an injury incident. Under the law, this declaration should be in writing through a resolution of the governing body of the organization or agency, such as its board of directors. Unpaid internships are another volunteer opportunity the City can leverage; however, some criteria must be met California Labor Relations Department has provided some clarification regarding unpaid internships. Unpaid internships are a type of volunteering that is intended to provide educational opportunities – and in some cases, school credit – for volunteers. As of April of 2010, the California Labor Relations Department applies six (6) criteria based on federal law when determining the legality of an unpaid internship: 1) the experience must resemble those of vocational schools, 2) the experience is primarily for the benefit of the intern, 3) the intern does not displace a regular employee, 4) the intern’s services provide no immediate advantage to the employer, 5) the intern is not entitled to a job at the end of his/her internship, and 6) both the employer and intern have a mutual understanding that no compensation is expected for the internship. 4.1.4 Mutual Aid The City of Temecula has several mutual aid agreements, most focused on public safety and emergency management. An emergency management mutual aid agreement defines and formalizes the arrangement to lend assistance across jurisdictional boundaries in situations that have exhausted internal resources or there is a need for increased capabilities. Some of the City of Temecula mutual aid agreements are with the State of California. This enables the state to request or fulfill requests for mutual aid from one region to another; enabling locals to maintain their readiness in their region. 4.1.5 Partnerships The City of Temecula has the ability to enter into partnerships with surrounding cities and counties, outside agencies, special districts, and companies. Partnerships are an arrangement where parties agree to cooperate to advance their mutual interests. In most cases, partnerships are done through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) outlining the scope of work, the mission, and roles and responsibilities. 4.2 Mitigation Governance Resources There are a variety of governance that are directly related to or influence mitigation efforts. This governance falls under: 1) Laws, Regulations, Codes, and Ordinances; 2) Plans, Studies, and Reports; and 3) Programs. While the intent is to capture city-level information, there are some state-level and/or county-level information that has direct implications on the city. As can be expected, the city has greater ability to revise, adjust, add, and remove governance to better reflect the needs of governance and its sponsors. The city regularly assesses and evaluates the effectiveness of its governance and incorporates changes to help meet the intended goal. The city does provide input and comments on governance sponsored by other organizations but Page|53 because the intended audience of the governance is usually greater than the city, it is not always incorporated. To ensure that there is a comprehensive list of governance, relevant state -level and/or county-level information is also captured. 4.2.1 Laws, Regulations, Codes, and Ordinances Title: Senate Bill (SB) 379 Sponsor: State of California, Senate Description: In 2017, the California State Senate approved Senate Bill (SB) 379 which requires the General Plan’s Safety Element to address climate adaptation and resilience strategies. This must be done after the next revision to the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP ) or by January 2022 if the city/county does not have an LHMP. If the jurisdiction has an approved and adopted LHMP it can be summarized and incorporated by reference into the Safety Element. Title: Assembly Bill (AB) 477 Sponsor: State of California, Assembly Description: In 2019, the California State Assembly approved Assembly Bill (AB) 477. AB477 requires local jurisdictions (cities/counties) to include representatives from the access and functional needs population in the next update of the Emergency Plan. The primary focus areas include, but are not limited to emergency communications, emergency evacuations, and emergency sheltering. Title: Assembly Bill (AB) 2140 Sponsor: State of California, Assembly Description: In 2006, the California State Assembly approved Assembly Bill (AB) 2140. AB 2140 enables the state of California to provide greater than 75% of the eligible state share if a local urisdiction (city county) has an approved and adopted LHMP as part of the General Plan’s Safety Element. Title: California Building Codes Sponsor: State of California Description: The City abides by and is governed by California 2019 Building Codes including sections on electric, plumbing, mechanical, green, and residential requirements, standards, and regulations. Title: City of Temecula Municipal Code Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: The City abides by and is governed by its Municipal Code to provide a scheme of organization for the classification and grouping of ordinances which the City Council may adopt. The Temecula Municipal code is made up of all ordinances that are of a general and permanent nature. Page|54 Title: Riverside County Building Codes Sponsor: Riverside County Description: State law requires that all cities and counties in California enforce the building codes as mandated by the California Building Standards Commission. The County of Riverside has adopted by ordinance the California Building Code, 2019 edition, as modified b y the State of California. Title: California Zoning Ordinance Sponsor: State of California Description: The City has adopted a Zoning Ordinances as part of the General Plan process. These ordinances regulate land use and map the official land use and hazard overlay districts, to include safety hazard and environmental protection areas. Title: Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance Sponsor: State of California Description: Over the years, the State of California has been promoting water conservation for all new development within the State. In a drought -prone California, where approximately 60 percent of all residential water is used in landscape applications, California lawmakers have adopted such legislation as Assembly Bill (AB) 325 (1990), AB 2717 (2004), and AB 1881 (2006) that outline, and in some instances mandate, the practice of water conservation in landscape applications. As part of AB 325, the Department of Water Resources (DWR) prepare and promote the State’s first Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). In 2006, State lawmakers adopted AB 1881, which gave guidelines and timelines for revision of the State’s MWELO and mandated that every city, county, or other agency within the State of California adopt the State’s revised MWELO or be in compliance with it through their own ordinance, by January 2010. Title: Emergency Planning and Right to Know Act Sponsor: State of California Description: The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) was created to help communities plan for emergencies involving hazardous substances. EPCRA has four (4) major provisions: one (1) deals with emergency planning and three (3) deal with chemical reporting. EPCRA local emergency planning requirements (Sections 301 to 303) stipulate that every community in the United States must be part of a comprehensive emergency response plan. Facilities are required to participate in the planning process. State Emergency Response Commissions (SERCs) oversee the implementation of EPCRA requirements in each state. Page|55 4.2.2 Plans, Reports, Studies Title: General Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: All cities and counties in California are required to adopt a General Plan that lays out major policy and development goals. The General Plan includes elements, which are sections that address a variety of important topics. The element most closely related to Mitigation is the Safety Element, which focuses on natural, technological, and other human caused hazards. The aim o f the Safety Element is to reduce the potential risk of death, injury, property damage, and economic and social dislocation resulting from fires, floods, earthquakes, landslides, and other hazards. The Safety Element identifies all significant hazards and risks in a community and defines policies to mitigate and respond to those risks. In addition to ensuring that the General Plan incorporates information from the LHMP into the Safety Element, the General Plan is also reviewed while producing the LHMP to ensure goals, objectives, and mitigation actions are compatible and in sync with each other. Title: Quality of Life Master Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: A framework of goals and performance measures that the City uses in its planning and budgeting process. Each City Department sets annual service goals in the budgeting process and is measured against those goals during the following year’s budget process. In addition, each project included in the Capital Improvement Program is aligned with the QLMP Core Values and must be justified in terms of how it helps to achieve the Core Value objectives. Title: Emergency Operations Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: An all-hazards plan describing how the City will organize and respond to incidents. It is based on and is compatible with the laws, regulations, plans, and policies listed above. The Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) also addresses the integration and coordination of resources and activities with other Governmental Agencies, Special Districts, and private -sector partners. Title: Old Town Specific Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: The Old Town Specific Plan was adopted by the City Council in February of 1994. Since its adoption, the Specific Plan has been revised six (6) times. Old town is but a part, albeit an important part, of this larger community. New development surrounds the historic town site and while many of its historic structures have been torn down or moved, other still remain as a reminder of what Temecula was, and more importantly, as an inspiration for what it can be in the future. Based upon the visioning process, Old Town is envisioned to develop a vibrant pedestrian-friendly, walkable downtown destination in the heart of Temecula’s historic district. The ambiance of Old Town will be created by a vibrant streetscape which includes buildings Page|56 reminiscent of architecture from the 1880’s through the 1940’s. The distinct charm of the Old Town area will attract a wide range of interest throughout the community, the region, and beyond. Title: Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: The urban neighborhoods in Uptown Temecula are located within walking distance to a hub of quality and thriving business, technologically innovative employment centers, and higher education facilities. The vibe of Uptown Temecula fosters creativity, stimulates innovation, and provides a place for community members to work, learn, and refashion the world around them. In addition to expanding its service to traditional weekend -oriented tourism, the stronger presence of businesses and corporations fill hotel rooms and su pport small conventions and events that occur during the week. Uptown Temecula is designed and built from the collective, shared efforts of public participation, private development, and public investments. These efforts are driven by a community-based vision and priorities for strategic, feasible, and flexible revitalization. Title: Altair Specific Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: Altair is envisioned as the complimentary residential component to the Old Town Specific Plan area of the City of Temecula. The two plan areas are integral to a successful urban mixed-use environment. Altair will provide up to 1,750 new homes for a range of household sizes, incomes, and demographics. The homes of Altair will be a pedestrian-oriented community within walking distance of cycling distance of Old Town. The dense design will attract residents looking for an urban lifestyle, a demographic that tends to patronize the type of restaurants and shops already in Old Town. Title: Mass Care & Shelter Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: This plan describes the actions, roles, and responsibilities of coordinating and participating organizations within the City in their endeavor to manage the care and shelter process before, during, and after the emergency. This plan addresses only general strategies used for any emergency in general, and the EOC coordination efforts specifically. Tactical actions that are taken at the shelter or evacuation sites are described in individual Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Title: Growth Management Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The GMP provided a formal policy to implement growth management measures for the City of Temecula. All projects are reviewed for compliance with the Growth Management Plan. Projects Page|57 that involve Zone Changes, General Plan Amendments, Planned Development Overlays, Planned Development Overlay Amendments, Specific Plans, Specific Plan Amendments, Area Plans, and Community Plans have rigorous expectations in order to meet the goals and policies of the GMP. Title: City of Temecula Sustainability Plan Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: Adopted by the City Council in June of 2010, the city’s sustainability plan is a comprehensive framework for sustainability policy related to air resources, community outreach, energy, green buildings, open space, transportation, waste management and water resources. The plan involves strategies to conserve water and energy, encourage green building, expand alternative transportation opportunities, increase open space, promote better air quality and reduce waste. 4.2.3 Programs The City of Temecula currently has the following mitigation programs to address the top hazards which are transportation failures, fires, and flooding. It should be noted that some of these programs were listed under Mitigation Strategy under the previous LHMP. However, because they are ongoing programs, they have since been removed from the Mitigation Strategy section and only captured here. Title: Earthquake Program Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: The City of Temecula employs mitigation efforts that rely heavily on public education and outreach, workshops for residents, businesses, schools, and government agencies. Communication through the use of and upgrades to the mass warning and notification sy stem, local radio, improvement of cellular and Wi-Fi capabilities, building retrofits, building code compliance measures, improved inspections for local businesses, schools, and public facilities. Annual inspections of local bridges, sewer and water facilities, waterways, and strengthening of communications networks. Title: Wildfire Program Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: As a city, mitigation efforts include aggressive weed abatement program, public education, and workshops on wildfire defense, enhancing of firefighting apparatus and equipment, fire inspections of established businesses, updating and implementing new building codes for community development, and consistent work with homeless outreach to prevent the unintentional spread of wildfire from open warming fires. Page|58 Title: Mass Care and Shelter Program Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: To increase Mass Care and Shelter capability of the county, grants from the Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) and Riverside Regional Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) funded the Mass Care and Shelter Trailer/Cache Program. The program will have procured numerous trailers/caches equipped with mass care and shelter supplies, strategically placed throughout the County and ready for rapid deployment. As part of this program, the City of Temecula possesses two (2) forward deployed trailers within the city for use in mass care and shelter activations. Each trailer is equipped to support 100 persons. In addition to enhancing the comfort levels of shelter residents, the program will produce standardized documents and protocols for procuring and maintaining Mass Care and Shelter trailers/caches. Title: Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: Since 2003, the City of Temecula has had a robust CERT Team. Under the direction of the Fire Department, Temecula’s CE T team helps provide critical support by giving immediate assistance to victims, providing damage assessment information, and organizing other volunteer s at a disaster site. Volunteers trained in CERT also offer a potential workforce for performing duties such as shelter support, crowd control, and evacuation. The role of a CERT volunteer is to help others until trained emergency personnel arrive. Temecula’s CE T Program sponsors four (4) training courses annually, two (2) for adults and tow (2) for teens. Title: Citizen Corps Advisory Program Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: The Temecula Citizens Corps (TCC) Advisory Board is an important and vital volunteer group that directly supports the TCC’s efforts to be a more prepared and disaster ready volunteer group within the city. Over the years the advisory board has provided direct support and linkage to city sponsored events as well as others across the southwest region in the hopes of providing non-profit access. TCC is the organization at the forefront of our efforts to have disaster trained citizens through their commitment to teach adults and teenagers in the 20-hour basic CERT Course providing over 100 hours of preparation and execution to this task alone each calendar year. As an advisory component, the team provides mentorship, advise, guidance and support in growing the program, increasing membership, and showcasing ab ilities and capabilities across the region. Title: Emergency Communications Group Sponsor: City of Temecula Description: This group is responsible for redundant emergency communications and provides supplemental communication assistance to City agencies in the event of a disaster, emergency, or other designated event. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in Part 97, Sub -part E of the Commission’s ules provide for the adio Amateur Civil Emergency Service ( ACES). The Page|59 purpose of RACES is to provide communication support to government during periods of local, regional, or national emergency. Additionally, this group of individuals provide direct communication support to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in the use and maintenance of all radio equipment within the radio room. 4.3 Technical Resources 4.3.1 Proficiencies and Expertise The City of Temecula has many proficiencies and expertise that can be leveraged in support of mitigation efforts. In addition to public safety and fire suppression capabilities, the City has access to staff with skills in Engineering/Construction, Planning, En vironmental, Risk Management, Project/Grant Management, Economic Development, Debris Removal, and Emergency Management. 4.3.2 Technology As with many jurisdictions, the City of Temecula has been increasing its technology capabilities. This includes providing secure platforms to store and access information, means of ensuring continuity of government, cyber security, and general technical support. A significant capability available to support mitigation efforts is through the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) section of the Information Technology and Support Systems (ITSS) Department. GIS is a computer system for capturing, storing, checking, and displaying data related to positions on the Earth’s surface. By relating seemingly unrelated data, GIS can help individuals and organizations better understand spatial patterns and relationships. The GIS section of ITSS is able to analyze and generate reports of critical data (land use, built environment, natural environment), able to demonstrate potential ramifications of actions or events, and generate graphic representations of results. 4.3.3 Communications The City of Temecula has several platforms in which to communicate with staff, surrounding jurisdictions, and the general public. In addition to the standard methods (telephone/cellular telephone, emails), the City has interoperable communications capabilities (radio communications and satellite communications). In addition to the above 2-way communications platforms, there are several “push” platforms that can be used. These consist of television (city owned TV channel), broadcast radio, websites, and social media (Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram). The City of Temecula’s Emergency Mass Notification System, Temecula ALE T, will communicate emergency and other urgent messages to residents of Temecula and any others that have opted into our system thought the self-registration portal or SRP. The system uses both text and voice message to keep residents in Temecula informed in case of emergencies that affect are as in which they live or work. With this information, residents and businesses can make informed Page|60 decisions that help ensure the safety of family members, employees, pets, and property in the event of fires, flood, earthquakes, or other types of disasters. In the event of an emergency, residents will receive a message with the latest information and safety instruction. The system is programmed to know whether or not the message has been delivered to a person, recorded to voicemail, or was not delivered due to a telephone system error. The system will continue to attempt to deliver its messages until the message is successfully delivered to a person, or until the message expires. The system utilizes the area’s 9-1-1 database, provided by the local telephone company, and thus is able to contact land-line telephones whether listed or unlisted. 4.4 Fiscal Resources The financial resources of the City of Temecula are allocated to and accounted for in various funds based upon the purposes for which the funds are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds include Governmental Funds; Proprietary Funds; and, Fiduciary Funds. • Governmental Funds - Used for most of city governmental functions. There are four (4) types of Governmental Funds: General Fund; Special Fund; Debt Services Fund; and Capital Project Funds. o General Fund - The operating fund used to account for all activities, expect those requires to be accounted for in another fund o Special Fund - Used for proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted to expenditures of special purposes o Debt Services Fund - Used for accumulation of resources and the payment of principal, interest, and related costs of general long-0term debt o Capital Project Funds - Used for resources for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities • Proprietary Funds - Used for government’s business-type activities. These funds recover the cost of providing services through fees and charges on those who use their services. There are two (2) types of Proprietary Funds: Enterprise Funds, and Internal Services Funds. o Enterprise Funds - used for services provided primarily to external customers and legal requirements or management policy required services, including capital, be fully recovered through fees and charges o Internal Services Funds - used for services provided to other funds, departments, or agencies of the government. Costs are allocated to the benefitting funds in the form of fees and charges in order to recover the full cost of providing services • Fiduciary Funds - used for assets held in a trustee or agency capacity for outside parties, including individuals, private organizations, and other government. Page|61 4.4.1 Government Fund The primary account for the City of Temecula under the Government Fund is the General Fund. Reallocation of funds from the General Fund is the main source of funds the City can access to implement mitigation projects. For the City of Temecula, the General Fund forecast over the coming (5) five years is balanced, with its Reserve for Economic Uncertainty and its Secondary Reserve fully funded in all (5) five years. The City’s General Fund is pro ected to increase by 3.2% over the prior year. Our tax revenu es are projected to increase by 4.3% (Figure 4.3) providing for the City’s stability and ability to fund mitigation projects should an immediate need arise. Figure 4.3 – General Fund Projections (2022) The majority of Fiscal Year 2022-23 General Fund revenue is made up of Sales Tax, Property Tax, Property Tax in Lieu of ehicle License Fees, and contributions from the City’s one-percent Transactions and se Tax (Measure S). The City’s Sales Tax base is fairly well diversified with 28% coming from the Autos and Transportation sector, 22% from General Consumer Goods, 15% from the County Pool which include sales tax from online retail sales, another 11% from Restaurants and Hotels, and the remainder from Business and Industry, Food and Drugs and the Construction sector of the local economy. Figure 4.4 – General Fund Revenue (2022) Page|62 The largest expenditure of the General Fund is Public Safety, making up 57% of total General Fund expenditures. In accordance with the Measure S ballot language and City Council appropriation guidelines, the City has invested heavily in Public Safety over the past several years and continues to hold Public Safety as its highest priority. Overall, the General Fund remains structurally balanced, with revenues exceeding expenditures, and reserves are fully-funded each year of the ensuing five-year financial forecast. The City continues to budget in a conservative, yet realistic, manner while keeping close watch on several economic indicators. As conditions change, adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2022-23 revenue or expenditure budgets will be recommended and presented to the City Council for their approval. Figure 4.5 – General Fund Expenditures (2022) 4.4.1.1 City of Temecula Measure S Fund With the approval of a one-cent transactions and use tax measure in November 2016, the Measure S Fund was established to account for this new revenue source. Fiscal Year 2022-23 Measure S revenue is projected to increase by 4.0% to $37,610,081, as the local economy continues to expand. Measure S appropriations of $38,044,429 for Fiscal Year 2022-23 reflect the priorities established in Budget Policy IV – Transactions and Use Tax Funding. The ending fund balance within the Measure S Fund is projected to be $11,021,315, which will carry-forward to the ensuing fiscal year. Over the ensuing five-year period, Measure S is projected to have adequate resources to fund public safety, asset management, capital projects and general services. Page|63 As depicted in Figure 4.6 Measure S is an additional source of funding locally that provides for the City’s ability to fund mitigation projects should federal or state hazard mitigation funding is unavailable. Figure 4.6 – Measure S Appropriations (2022) 4.4.2 Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds Other means to implementing mitigation projects is the utilization of Proprietary and Fiduciary Funds. While there are a variety of options that the City may be able to access under these funds, the primary funds will be those secured through project grants, such as the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) programs - Hazard Mitigation Grant Program - HMGP, Flood Mitigation Assistance - FMA, or Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities - BRIC (formerly, the Pre-Disaster Mitigation- PDM program). Currently, the City has not received any FEMA HMA grants over the past five (5) years. 4.4.3 Education and Outreach Capabilities Table 4.1 lists the City of Temecula’s financial and public outreach capabilities. These capabilities include programs such as fire safety programs, hazard awareness campaigns, public information, or communications offices. Education and outreach capabilities can b e used to inform the public on current and potential mitigation activities. Page|64 Table 4.1 – Education and Outreach Resources Name Description (Effect on Hazard Mitigation) Lead Organization Stop the Bleed Starting after the Route 91 shooting in Las Vegas, it addresses preventing traumatic blood loss deaths. It would address any hazard that creates a traumatic injury that results in blood loss (e.g., earthquake, terrorism, etc.). Temecula Fire and Office of Emergency Management (OEM) County Emergency/Disaster Readiness App The City promotes the Riverside County readiness app (RivCo Ready). It is a great tool for the community to use in preparation for all major disaster types. Riverside County Emergency Management Department (EMD) Telephone Emergency Notification System The City operates the Telephone Emergency Notification System known as Temecula ALERT. A link is provided on the Office of Emergency Managements page. Since sixty percent (60%) of people only use cell phones, cell phone registration is encouraged. Office of Emergency Management Public Event Outreach and Awareness Programming The City OEM provides information on training, emergency preparedness, and resources every year at public events. These events include neighborhood pop-ups, the City’s Annual Preparedness Fair, and National Night Out. OEM performs outreach presentations to various community groups upon request. Office of Emergency Management CERT Team A team of dedicated volunteers supporting the City’s disaster response efforts. This team meets twice monthly and is a key asset to the City of Temecula. Temecula Fire and Office of Emergency Management City Website Office of Emergency Management Site that hosts information on earthquake preparedness, heat risk, warming/cooling centers, floods, and fires. Office of Emergency Management Disaster Preparedness and Shelter Training The American Red Cross offers free disaster preparedness for residents in addition to hands only CPR training. They also include free smoke alarm installations. A full shelter training curriculum consisting of Shelter Fundamentals, Shelter Supervisor and Shelter Operations Simulation is available upon request. American Red Cross Page|65 4.4.4 National Flood Insurance Program Participation The City of Temecula participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which Congress created in 1968 to subsidize flood insurance to homeowners who live in flood -prone areas. Individual communities have the option to participate in the NFIP. However, pr operty owners who live in nonparticipating communities with flood-prone areas will not be able to buy flood insurance through the program. Additionally, nonparticipating communities with mapped flood plains cannot receive federal grants or loans for development activities in flood-prone areas and cannot receive federal disaster assistance to repair flood-damaged buildings in mapped flood plains. Temecula has participated in the NFIP since 10/25/1989. Although participation is not a dedicated hazard mitigation action, Temecula will continue to participate in the NFIP and comply with the program’s requirements through continued enforcement of the City’s Floodplain Management egulations. These regulations apply to all areas identified as flood-prone within the City and identify the purpose, methods of reducing flood losses, basis for establishing flood hazard areas, development permit requirements, duties and responsibilities of the City’s Floodplain Administrator, development standards that apply in flood-prone areas, and required documentation and analysis for construction within these areas. As part of the City’s efforts to comply with NFIP, Temecula will update and revise the Floodplain Management regulations to minimize the threat of harm from future flood events. These updates and revisions may be promoted by changes in local demographics, shifts in land use, changes to flood regimes such as frequency and intensity of flood events, and other factors that may warrant municipal action. The City will also continue to incorporate any changes to the locations and designations of mapped flood plains into future planning documents, including future updates to this Plan. The City of Temecula has been designated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), as including Zone(s) A, AE, AH, D, and X, which are Special Flood Hazard Zones and Non-Special Flood Hazard Areas. Areas located within Zones D and X are not in any immediate danger from flooding caused by overflowing rivers or hard rains. However, it is noted that structures within a Non -Special Flood Hazard Area are still at risk. Because the City is within Zone(s) A, AE, AH, D, and X, insurance purchase is required for those locations residing within zones that begin with an A. Notwithstanding, the City participates in the NFIP. Special Flood Hazard Area(s) • Zone A: The flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the 1% annual chance floodplains. No base (1% annual chance) flood elevations or depths are shown within this zone. • Zone AE: The flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the 1% annual chance floodplains. Page|66 • Zone AH: The flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the areas of 1% annual chance shallow flooding (usually areas of ponding) where average depths are between 1 and 3 feet. • Other Areas of Flood Hazard • Zone D (Areas of Undetermined Flood Hazard): The flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to unstudied areas where flood hazards are undetermined, but possible. • Zone X: Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood hazards and areas of 1% annual chance flood hazards with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile. Table 4.2 – National Flood Insurance Program Participation NFIP Participation CID Community Name County Initial FHBM Identified Initial FIRM Identified Current Eff. Map Date Reg. Emer. Date Tribal #060742 Temecula, City of Riverside County 10/25/1989 09/02/1993 8/27/2008 8/28/1991 No There are no repetitive loss or severe repetitive loss properties within the City of Temecula. Additionally, the City has adopted language consistent with the NFIP flood plain management program into City code. 4.5 Expansion of and Improvement Upon Mitigation Capabil ities There are a multitude of methods and processes that a jurisdiction may use to improve upon current capabilities to mitigate emergencies or disasters. The City of Temecula has identified the below to support this thought process: Personnel: Hiring of new staff in departments with identified deficiencies in capabilities or processes can and will make the staff stronger thereby increasing capabilities. Ho wever, the addition of employees is always a point of contention that does not always materialize. Through training and implementation of additional support resources as well as the creation of working groups to support the mitigation project planning process may prove to be successful in the absence of additional staffing. • Governance: Continue to ensure that necessary regulations are put in place relating to building codes, ordinances, and state and federal requirements. • Administrative: The administrative capabilities can be improved upon by developing a mitigation actions implementation plan that is reviewed and updated on a recurring basis. This process would be used to update the LHMP over the coming years providing updates to the status of projects and actions. Page|67 • Technical: Incorporate technical expertise resident within the City staff into the emergency management planning process to include the development of mitigation projects. • Fiscal: Identify additional funding opportunities that can be expanded upon for mitigation. In previous years, hazard mitigation grants have not been utilized to complete any projects that have been identified by the hazard mitigation planning team. • Outreach: Expand current capability through an increase in the number of events participated in, presentations conducted to the community through integration with HOA’s and civic organizations. Promote preparedness through increased use of social media and the creation of an emergency management section to the City application. Page|68 This page is intentionally left blank Page|69 5.1 Overview The purpose of this section is to capture the approach used by the City of Temecula’s Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to identify and prioritize (screen) hazards within its community. This is an important step to ensure all potential hazards are considered and relevant hazards ranked as to the greatest concern within the community. This section also presents relevant information (profiles) on each hazard in the community. The “Hazard Profiles” provide a description of the hazard, the location and or extent of the hazard within the community, the history of the hazard within the community, the probability of the hazard occurring in the community, and a discussion of any considerations needed due to changing conditions (i.e., climate). This information was referenced when prioritizing hazards. 5.2 Hazard Identification The HMPT went through an extensive effort to identify all of the hazards present in the community. The Planning Team started with the list of hazards in the City of Temecula 2017 LHMP and augmented the list as necessary. This augmentation considered adding, removing, and renaming of hazards to create a list of all potential hazards in the community. The HMPT utilized several external resources to ensure they were considering all potential hazards. These resources included the State of California HMP (2018), the Riverside County OA LHMP (2017), and several other surrounding community LHMPs (i.e., Lake Elsinore, Murrieta, Menifee). This helped the Planning Team understand statewide, countywide, and surrounding area hazard concerns. Each hazard identified in the external resources were reviewed and considered by the Planning Team. After careful review and consideration, the Planning Team identified the following top 10 hazards for inclusion in the City of Temecula’s LHMP update: • Transportation Failure • Fire (Wildfire) • Earthquake • Electrical Failure (Public Safety Power Shutoff) • Flooding • Communications Failure • Pandemic • Hazardous Materials Incident • Extreme Weather – Heat • Drought As a note, no hazards from the City of Temecula’s 2017 LHMP were removed, however, the Planning Team did re-prioritize the list of hazards as listed above. It is also important to note that 5. HAZARD ASSESSMENT Page|70 the Planning Team did revise the name and description of some haz ards to provide more clarity and understanding of the hazard. This step also led to separating and creating distinct individual hazards (i.e., Power Outage (PSPS)/Extreme Weather - Heat). The changes to the hazard descriptions and other relevant hazard information are captured under sub section 5.4 - Hazard Profiles. The City of Temecula’s identified hazards align with the iverside County Multi -Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan for 2023 in totality. However, the prioritization of these hazards are specific to the County’s threats as a whole while Temecula’s are specific to the identified threats of our much smaller jurisdiction. 5.3 Hazard Screening and Prioritization After the list of hazards was identified, the Planning Team went through a process to prioritize (screen) the hazards to determine which hazards created the greatest concern in the community. The Planning Team utilized a non-numerical ranking system that was implemented during this update to the City of Temecula LHMP. This process consists of generating a qualitative ranking, High, Medium, or Low rating for: 1) Probability; and 2) Impact from each hazard. As part of this process, the following criteria (definitions) were applied: • Probability o High: (Highly Likely/Likely) There may or may not have been historic occurrences of the hazard in the community or region, but experts feel that it is likely that the hazard will occur in the community. Citizens feel that there is a likelihood of occurrence. o Medium: (Possible) There may or may not have been a historic occurrence of the hazard in the community or region, but experts feel that it is possible that the hazard could occur in the community. Citizens may feel that there is a likelihood of occurrence. o Low: (Unlikely) There have been no historic occurrences of the hazard in the community or region and both experts and citizens agree that it is highly unlikely that the hazard will occur in the community. • Impact o High: (Catastrophic/Critical) Both experts and citizens feel that the con sequences will be significant in terms of building damage and loss of life. o Medium: (Limited, but not insignificant) Consequences are thought to be modest in terms of building damage and loss of life, limited either in geographic extent or magnitude. o Low: (Negligible) Consequences are thought to be minimal in terms of building damage and loss of life, limited either in geographic extent or magnitude. After each hazard was ranked using the above criteria, the results were displayed in a graph to assist the Planning Team validate the results (Figure 5.1). The Planning Team determined all Page|71 hazards falling within the gray-colored boxes were Tier I priority hazards, those within the blue- colored boxes were Tier II priority hazards, and those within the purple-colored boxes were Tier III priority hazards. The higher priority hazards (Tier I and Tier II), reflect those hazards the Planning Team determined the community should focus on over the next five (5) years. This does not mean that the community will not address the lower priority hazards. It means if resources are limited (i.e., funding, staffing), the primary focus will be on the higher priority hazards. Figure 5.1 - Hazard Prioritization Matrix (2022) IMPACT High Medium Low PROBABILITY High Earthquake Wildfire Transportation Flood Drought Comm Failure Medium Extreme Heat Electrical Failure HAZMAT Pandemic Aqueduct Failure Storm Cyber Attack Pipeline Disruption Insect Infestation Landslide Nuclear Event Rad Incident Low Tornado Dam Failure Terrorist MCI Water Disruption Emergent Disease Civil Disorder Jail/Prison Event 5.4 Hazard Profiles The Hazard Profiles include the incorporation of all new information, material, and reports to better help the Planning Team and the community understand the hazard. The hazards are organized alphabetically as identified in the hazard priority matrix. The top 10 hazards assessed by the Planning Team are summarized below: 5.4.1 Top 10 Hazards The hazards, in alphabetical order, include Communications Failure; Drought; Earthquake; Electrical Failure; Extreme Weather – Heat; Fire (Wildfire); Flooding; Hazardous Materials Incident; Pandemic; and Transportation Failure. Page|72 5.4.1.1 Communications Failure • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - Medium • Description Technology disruption includes both deliberate (cyber -attacks) or accidental (equipment failure or human error) actions that can cause the loss of use of technology and/or data. A cyber threat/attack is a circumstance or event that has or indicates the potential to exploit technology vulnerabilities and to adversely impact organizational operations, organizational assets (including information and information systems), individuals, other organizations, or society. Critical infrastructure, such as utilities and telecommunications, are also potential targets. Cyber threats/attacks are most easily described as either external threats (where attacks originate outside of established networks) or internal/insider threats (where attacks origina te from users who have existing access to an internal network). Examples of cyber threats/attacks include malware and hacking, phishing, denial of service attacks, ransomware, and state -sponsored hacking. Any one of these threats, if initiated, and successful, can produce a cyber-attack that has major implications throughout the organization. Recent report produced by Verizon (2020) analyzes 32,002 security incidents and 3,950 confirmed breaches from 81 global contributors from 81 countries and indicate the following trends: ✓ 86% of data breaches for financial gain - up from 71% in 2019 ✓ Cloud-based data under attack – web application attacks double to 43% ✓ 67% of breaches caused by credential theft, errors, and social attacks ✓ Clearly identified cyber-breach pathways enable a “Defender Advantage” in the fight against cyber-crime ✓ On-going patching successful - fewer than 1 in 20 breaches exploit vulnerabilities ✓ 37% of credential theft breaches used stolen or weak credentials ✓ 25% involved phishing ✓ Human error accounted for 22% • Location and Extent Technology disruptions can happen anywhere within the City but will generally be targeted towards larger corporations or government organizations. • History While there have been several smaller cyber threats and hacking, none have reached a level of significance. However, the frequency of cyber-attacks on public and private sector organizations in general, continues to rise. • Probability The probability of technology disruptions is on the rise globally, national, and locally. The probability of occurrence of cyber threats is rapidly increasing, especially with increased reliance Page|73 on the Internet and cloud-based computing. However, cyber security threats/attacks will generally be targeted towards larger corporations or state/national governments which are not located within the county. Local governments are increasingly being targeted by cyber criminals on the basis that they have fewer resources to defend themselves. Unlike natural hazards, where there is historical data, and some predictive modeling can occur, cyber-attacks are an emerging hazard, which are more challenging to anticipate. • Climate Change Considerations While there is little evidence to link climate change to increase in occurrences of cyber security threats/attacks, the target could be related to persons/groups with issues with individuals or companies they perceive to have effect on the climate (i.e., greenhouse gas producers) within the community. And much like terrorism, depending on the consequence of the cyber -attack, it could hinder the response and recovery efforts. 5.4.1.2 Drought • Ranking: Probability – High; Impact - Medium • Description Drought can best be thought of as a condition of water shortage for a particular user in a particular location. Drought is a gradual phenomenon and generally are not signified by one or two dry years. California’s extensive system of water supply infrastructure (reservoirs, groundwater basins, and interregional conveyance facilities) generally mitigates the effects of short‐term dry periods for most water users. However, drought conditions are present when a region receives below-average precipitation, resulting in prolonged shortages in its water supply, whether its water supply is provided by atmospheric, surface, or ground water means. A drought can last for months or years or may be declared after as few as 15 days. Drought is not a purely physical phenomenon, but rather an interplay between natural water availability and human demands for water supply. The precise definition of drought is made complex owing to political considerations, but there are generally four (4) types of conditions that are referred to as drought: • Meteorological drought is brought about when there is a prolonged period with less than average precipitation. • Agricultural drought is brought about when there is insufficient moisture for average crop or range production. This condition can arise, even in times of average precipitation, owing to soil conditions or agricultural techniques. • Hydrologic drought is brought about when the water reserves available in sources such as aquifers, lakes, and reservoirs fall below the statistical average. This condition can Page|74 arise, even in times of average (or above average) precipitation, when increased usage of water diminishes the reserves. • Socioeconomic drought associates the supply and demand of water services with elements of meteorological, hydrologic, and agricultural drought. Socioeconomic drought occurs when the demand for water exceeds the supply as a result of weather- related supply shortfall. The U.S. Drought Monitor, established in 1999, is a weekly map of drought conditions produced jointly by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the National Drought Mitigation Center at the University of Nebraska -Lincoln. The map is based on measurements of climatic, hydrologic and soil conditions as well as report ed impacts and observations from more than 350 contributors around the country. Droughts are generally categorized into five (5) categories: D1) Abnormally Dry, D2) Moderate Drought; D3) Severe Drought; D4) Extreme Drought; and D5) Exceptional Drought. There are many considerations that are factored into the determining the drought status; these include consideration of status on the: Palmer Drought Severity Index; CPC Soil Moisture Model; USGS Weekly Streamflow; Standardized Precipitation Index; and Objective Drought Indicator Blends. • Location and Extent The entire City of Temecula is subject to drought conditions and water shortages. Figure(s) 5.2 and 5.3 – Riverside County / Temecula Current Drought Conditions (2021) Page|75 • History It was only recently that the State of California emerged from a proclaimed a State of Emergency due to extremely dry conditions. The longest duration of drought (D1-D4) in California lasted 376 weeks beginning on December 27, 2011 and ending on March 5, 2019. The most intense period of drought occurred 2014 and 2017, where at its peak over 50% of the land in California was under Exceptional Drought (D4) conditions. The City of Temecula has experienced several droughts, most recently during the statewide drought from 2011-2019. In March of 2022, the Governor of California re-issued a proclamation and orders from previous years placing communities back into water conservation efforts state-wide. • Probability In any given year, California and the City of Temecula can be subject to drought conditions and water shortages. This is especially true since much of the water is provided by outside resources, resources that are shared with others. It is also important to note that droughts do not happen overnight, they are a slow buildup of conditions. On average, seventy -five percent (75%) of the state’s annual precipitation occurs in the “wet season”- November thru March. December, January, and February generally see the most precipitation but there have been many early and late season storms that bring in a substantial amount of precipitation. One of the best ways to predict drought conditions is to study the status of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) patterns. In California. ENSO is a periodic shifting of ocean atmosphere conditions in the tropical Pacific that ranges from El Niño (warm phase) to neutral to La Niña (cold phase). La Niña conditions tend to favor a drier outlook for Southern California; while the El Niño conditions favor stronger, and wetter storms. • Climate Change Considerations Climate change has the potential to make drought events more common in the West, including California. Extreme heat creates conditions more conducive for evaporation of moisture from the ground, thereby increasing the possibility of drought. A warming planet could lead to earlier melting of winter snowpacks, leaving lower stream flows and drier conditions in the late spring and summer. Snowpacks are important in terms of providing water storage and ensuring adequate supply in the summer when water is most needed. Changing precipitation distribution and intensity have the potential to cause more of the precipitation that does fall to run-off rather than be stored. The result of these processes is an increased potential for more frequent and more severe periods of drought. 5.4.1.3 Earthquake • Ranking: Probability – High; Impact - High • Description The City of Temecula is located near several known active and potentially active earthquake faults including the Elsinore Fault, San Jacinto Fault, San Andreas Fault, and the Rose Canyon Fault. The Page|76 major potential for earthquake damage to Temecula is from activity along the San Jacinto Fault. The San Jacinto fault line is located approximately 50 miles to the East of Temecula. In the event of an earthquake, the location of the epicenter as well as the time of day could have a profound effect on the potential number of deaths and casualties. An earthquake occurring in or near this area could result in property damage, environmental damage, and disruption of normal government and community services and activities. The effects could be exacerbated by collateral damage such as fires, flooding, hazardous materials spills, utility disruptions, landslides, transportation failures and possible dam failures. Significant damage to buildings and infrastructure could occur due to severe ground shaking. The community needs could quickly exceed the response capability of the City of Temecula’s emergency management organization, requiring mutual aid from across the county and/or region. Response and disaster relief support could be required from the county, state, and fede ral government. The primary consideration during an earthquake is the preservation of life. Emergency response will include providing shelter to displaced citizens and restoring basic needs and services. A major effort will be made to remove debris and clearing of roadways, demolition of unsafe structures, assisting in the reestablishment of public services and utilities while providing care for affected citizens. After any earthquake, there could be a loss of income. Individuals could lose wages due to business closure or damage to goods. Economic recovery is critical to our community. A fault is a fracture in the earth’s crust whereby two blocks of the crust have slipped with respect to each other. Faults are divided into three main groups, depending on how they move. A: Strike-slip (lateral) Faults – These occur in response to either type of stress. The blocks move horizontally past one another. B: Normal Faults – These occur in response to pulling or tension. The overlying block moves down the dip of the fault plane. C: Thrust (reverse) Faults – These occur in response to squeezing or compression. The overlying block moves up the dip of the fault plane. The effect of an earthquake on various locations throughout the felt area is called the intensity. The intensity scale consists of a series of certain key responses such as people awakening, movement of furniture, damage to chimneys, and total destruction of property. The scale currently used in the United States is the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale (Table 5.1). It was developed in 1931 by the American seismologists Harry Wood and Frank Neumann. This scale is composed of increasing levels of intensity designated by Roman numerals that range from imperceptible shaking (MMI I) to Page|77 catastrophic destruction (MMI X). It does not have a mathematical basis; instead, it is an empirical scale based on observed effects. Table 5.1 – Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale However, most people are familiar with the Richter scale, a method of rating earthquakes based on the amplitude of seismic waves - an indirect measure of energy released (Table 5.2). The Richter scale is logarithmic. Each one-point increase corresponds to a 10-fold increase in the amplitude of the seismic shock waves and a 32-fold increase in energy released. For example, an earthquake registering magnitude 7.0 on the Richter scale releases over 1,000 times more energy than an earthquake registering magnitude 5.0. It should be noted that while an earthquake may have many intensity values across the impacted area, there is just one Richter magnitude associated with each event. Table 5.2 – Richter Scale Page|78 Ground shaking and ground deformation (i.e., surface fault rupture, landslides, and liquefaction) are the specific hazards associated with earthquakes. The severity of these hazards depends on several factors, including soil and slope conditions, proximity to the fault, magnitude, and the type of earthquake. • Ground Shaking- Ground shaking is the motion felt on the earth's surface caused by seismic waves generated by the earthquake. It is the primary cause of earthquake damage. The strength of ground shaking depends on the magnitude of the earthquake, the type of fault, distance from the epicenter (where the earthquake originates), and local soil conditions. Soils and soft sedimentary rocks near the earth's surface can amplify earthquake ground shaking. Amplification increases the magnitude of the seismic waves generated by the earthquake. The amount of amplification is influenced by the thickness of geologic materials and their physical properties. Buildings and structures built on soft and unconsolidated soils can face greater risk. Amplification can also occur in areas with deep sediment filled basins and on ridge tops. Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) is a measure of the strength of ground shaking. Larger PGAs result in greater damage to structures. PGA is used to depict the risk of damage from future earthquakes by showing earthquake ground motions that have a specified probability (10%, 5%, or 2%) of being exceeded in 50 years return period. These values are often used for reference in construction design, and in assessing relative hazards when making economic and safety decisions. • Surface Fault Rupture- As previously mentioned, the sudden sliding of one part of the earth’s crust past another releases the vast storage of elastic energy in the rocks as an earthquake. The resulting fracture is known as a fault, while the sl iding movement of earth on either side of a fault is called fault rupture. Fault rupture generally begins below the ground surface at the earthquake hypocenter, typically between three and ten miles below the ground surface in California. If an earthquake is large enough, the fault rupture will reach the ground surface (referred to as “surface fault rupture”), wreaking havoc on structures built across its path. Structures built across the fault are a risk of significant damage from surface fault rupture. In California, the 1972 Alquist- Priola Earthquake Fault Zoning Act prohibits the siting of most structures for human occupancy across traces of active faults that constitute a potential hazard to structures from surface faulting. Recent large earthquakes in Turkey and Taiwan have shown that few structures built across the surface traces of faults can withstand the large displacements that may occur during an earthquake. • Landslides- Earthquake-induced landslides are secondary earthquake hazards that occur from ground shaking. They can destroy the roads, buildings, utilities, and other critical facilities necessary to respond and recover from an earthquake. Many communities in Southern California have a high likelihood of encountering such risks, especially in areas with steep slopes. (NOTE: while mentioned here, landslides are covered under a separate hazard) Page|79 • Liquefaction- Liquefaction is the phenomenon that occurs when ground shaking causes loose, saturated soils to lose strength and act like viscous fluid. Liquefaction causes two types of ground failure: lateral spread and loss of bearing strength. Lateral spreads develop on gentle slopes and entail the sidelong movement of large masses of soil as an underlying layer liquefies. Loss of bearing strength occurs when the soil supporting structures liquefy, causing the structures to settle, resulting in damage and, in some cases, collapse. • Location and Extent There are several fault lines that pass through or are near the City of Temecula. The fault of most interest is the Elsinore Fault. The Elsinore Fault line passes through the western portion of the city and spans both sides of the I-15 Freeway. The fault is a right-lateral strike slip fault and is about 180km in length with a slip rate of roughly 4.0 mm/year. The Elsinore fault has the capability of producing a temblor of a 6.5 to 7.5 magnitude. The most recent rupture on record was recorded on the 15th of May of 1910 and was a magnitude 6.0. The Elsinore fault zone is one of the largest in southern California, and in historical times, has been one of the quietest. The southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salada fault, ruptured in 1892 in a magnitude 7 quake, but the main trace of the Elsinore fault zone has only seen one historical event greater than magnitude 5.2 -- the earthquake of 1910, a magnitude 6 shock near Temescal Valley, which produced no known surface rupture and did little damage. Figure 5.4 – Elsinore Fault Line – City of Temecula (2022) The San Jacinto Fault extends 125 miles from near El Centro to near San Bernardino intersecting freeways 10, 215, and 60. This fault is a right-lateral strike-slip and minor right-reverse fault. The slip rate is typically between 7 and 17mm/year and capable of producing an earthquake between Page|80 6.5M and 7.5M. The last known quake on this fault line was on the 9 th of April 1968 and registered a magnitude 6.5 on the Coyote Creek segment of the fault line. Figure 5.5 – Temecula Fault Lines The San Andreas Fault passes between 80-100 miles to the east of Temecula. There are only two large known historic earthquakes on the San Andreas Fault in Southern CA, the most recent in 1857, and before that one in 1812. With about 45 years between the historic earthquakes but about 160 years since the last one, it is clear that the fault does not behave like a clock with a regular beat. Historic information doesn’t provide enough data to establish whether or not there is a pattern in the timing of earthquakes, but paleoseismology has provided an abundance of data. Along the southernmost San Andreas, from Palm Springs to the Salton Sea, earthquakes happen infrequently, about every 200-300 years. The most recent earthquake occurred during the time of Spanish exploration, about 300 years ago, but there is no historic record of the event. Instead, radiocarbon dating provides the age of the most recent earthquake and six more that occurred since about 800 A.D. In total, the fault stretches from Northern California to the Mexican b order and is over 600 miles long. The San Andreas Fault has the potential for producing an 8.3 magnitude earthquake. • History There are 45 states and territories in the nited States at “moderate” to “very high” risk from earthquakes, and they are located in every region of the country. California experiences the most frequent damaging earthquakes; however, Alaska experiences the greatest number of large Page|81 earthquakes—most located in uninhabited areas. The largest earthquakes felt in the United States were along the New Madrid Fault in Missouri, where a three-month long series of quakes from 1811 to 1812 included three quakes larger than a magnitude of 8 on the Richter scale. These earthquakes were felt over the entire Eastern United States, with Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi experiencing the strongest ground shaking. Historical and geological records show that California has a long history of seismic events . In California, movement between the North American and the Pacific tectonic plates manifest primarily along a region known as the San Andreas Fault system. Experts believe the San Andreas Fault is capable of producing an earthquake of magnitude 8.0+ over the next few years. The San Andreas Fault is considered the “Master Fault” because it has frequent (geologically speaking), large earthquakes, and it controls the seismic hazard in southern California. Faults in the San Andreas Fault zone that passes through Los Angeles County are part of the very active southern segment. This segment includes historically active, active, potentially active, and inactive faults. In June of 1992, the M7.3 Landers Earthquake ruptured 85 km (53 miles) along a series of faults in a roughly contiguous fault system, including the Johnson Valley, Landers, Homestead Valley, Emerson, and Camp Rock faults. The largest aftershock of the Landers e arthquake was the M6.4 Big Bear Earthquake, which caused damage and landslides in the Big Bear area. Other significant earthquake events in the region included: • Newport-Inglewood Earthquake, 6.4m (1933)- 120 deaths, over $50 million in damage • San Fernando (Sylmar) Earthquake, 6.5m (1971)- 65 deaths, over $500 million in damage • Whittier Narrows Earthquake 5.9m (1987)- 8 deaths, over $358 million in damage • Sierra Madre Earthquake 5.8m (1991)- 2 deaths, over $40 million in damage • Chino Hills Earthquake 5.4m (2008)- no casualties and only minor damage • City of Los Angeles Earthquake 4.7m (2009)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • El Mayor Cucapah Earthquake 7.2m (2010)- major damages to the area and Imperial County • Calimesa 4.1m (2011)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • La Habra Earthquake 5.1m (2014)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Fontana Earthquake 4.4m (2014)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Running Springs 4.6m (2014)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Fontana 4.2m (2015)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Big Bear Lake 4.0m (2015)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Muscoy 4.4m (2015)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Banning 4.4m (2016)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Cabazon 4.5m (2017)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Big Bear 3.5m (2018)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Trona (2019)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage • Ridgecrest 7.1m (2019)- no casualties and minor to moderate damage Page|82 Figure 5.6 – San Andreas Fault – Historical Timeline Southern California area has experienced several earthquakes, two very large earthquakes, the Fort Tejon in 1857 (M7.9) and the Owens Valley in 1872 (M7.6) are evidence of the tremendously damaging potential of earthquakes in Southern California. The Fort Tejon earthquake surface rupture broke the portions of the central and southern segments of the San Andreas Fault system (Cholame, Carrizo, and Mojave segments), resulting in displacements of as much as 27 feet (9 meters) along the rupture zone. These fault segments are thought to have an incident recurrence interval of between 104 and 296 years. The most recent significant earthquake event affecting the region was the Northridge Earthquake. At 4:31 A.M. on Monday, Jan uary 17, 1994, a very damaging earthquake with a magnitude of 6.7 struck the San Fernando Valley. In the following days and weeks, thousands of aftershocks occurred, causing additional damage to affected structures. Effects of the earthquake were felt north into Ventura County, south in Orange County, and east into Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. • Probability Earthquakes strike suddenly, without warning. Earthquakes can occur at any time of the year and at any time of the day or night. On a yearly bas is, 70 to 75 damaging earthquakes occur throughout the world. Recent estimates of expected annualized earthquake loss for the U.S. totals $5.3 billion per year, with 66% ($3.5 billion) concentrated within the State of California, and $397 million in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties (FEMA, 2008). The probability of a significant (M6.7 or greater) earthquake occurring in Southern California in the next 30 years has been estimated to be 97% by the 2007 California Working Group on Earthquake Probability, as shown in Figure 5.7. California Area 30-Year Earthquake Probabilities. (USGS Open-File Report 2007-1437). Page|83 Figure 5.7 – California 30-Year Earthquake Probabilities (2016) • Climate Change Considerations To date, no credible evidence has been provided that links climate to earthquakes. However, climate and weather does play a significant role in the response and recovery from earthquakes. Effects from climate change could create cascading complications and impacts. 5.4.1.4 Electrical Failure • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - High • Description For the purposes of this LHMP, Electrical Failure hazards are confined to rolling blackouts or brownouts and Public Safety Power Shutdown (PSPS) events. While some accidents can cause energy electrical failures, they are usually smaller, localized events and are not part of this assessment. Additionally, electrical failures hazards can be consequences from other events. These electrical outage consequences are discussed under the primary hazard event (high winds, wildfire, earthquake). A brownout is a partial, temporary reduction in total system capacity, while a blackout is a complete interruption in power. A brownout is caused by high electricity demand that is near or above a utility’s production capacity. When this occurs, the utility may reduce the Page|84 flow of electricity to certain areas to prevent a blackout. The state of California has also implemented “Flex Alerts” to bring awareness to times in which supply and demand of power could become an issue. A blackout is a large-scale service interruption that can happen as a result of severe weather or equipment failure at power plants. There are several factors that can play into electrical failures: 1) increased demand within the city; and 2) increased demand elsewhere. Because Southern California Edison is part of the western power grid, increases in other parts in the west region could curtail the energy available to the City. PSPS events are initiated by power utility companies and are implemented in response to severe weather events. The purpose is to mitigate the increased fire risk during “red flag” we ather conditions. Red flag weather conditions include high winds, low humidity, and high temperatures. By shutting off power, the utility companies are ensuring that electrical equipment, which can arc and spark, during severe events, will not exacerbate o r start a fire. • Location and Extent A Power Outage event can occur throughout the entire city at any time. • History Southern California has experienced a population growth over the years. This coupled with changes to daily lifestyles (heavier reliance on power) and changing weather patterns have contributed to a higher demand for power over recent years. Because of this, the City of Temecula, like other parts of California, have had power outage events related to the failure of the statewide or regional systems not being able to meet demand. Electrical failure events usually occur during the warmer summer months and have lasted for a few hours and in some cases days. Recently, the City has experienced several power outages and electrical events due to the power company’s implementing PSPS events in response to ed Flag weather conditions. Similar to the power outage during the summer months, these PSPS power outage s are relativity short in duration. • Probability There are no studies that predict the probabilit y of electrical failure events; however, it is expected that there is a higher probability of events occurring during the warmer summer months and during Red Flag (high temperatures, low humidity, high wind) events. • Climate Change Considerations Climate can play a significant role in Electrical Failure and Outage events. As temperatures rise due to changing conditions, it will have significant impacts on energy supply and demand. Additionally, changing climate conditions can create more Red Flag events, causing the power companies to consider turning off power to lessen the potential fire threat. Page|85 5.4.1.5 Extreme Weather – Heat • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - High • Description Extreme Heat conditions, according to the EPA and CDC, is defined as weather that is much hotter and more humid than average for a particular time and place. The heat index is a measure of how hot it feels when relative humidity is factored in with the actual air tempe rature (Figure 5.8). Relative humidity is the percentage of moisture in the air compared with the maximum amount of moisture the air can hold. Humidity is an important factor in how hot it feels because when humidity is high, water does not evaporate as easily, so it is harder for your body to cool off by sweating. Figure 5.8 – NO ’ N W h H Extreme heat is not just a nuisance; it kills hundreds of Americans every year and causes many more to become seriously ill. Measures to prevent illness are generally common sense, including staying cool indoors, keeping hydrated, limiting physical activity, and monitoring those at highest risk. • Location and Extent The entire city is subject to Extreme Weather (Heat) conditions. While this will affect humans, a significant impact would be felt on livestock and agriculture. The City of Temecula is home to the Page|86 Temecula Wine Country and has several wineries and growers that produce grapes and other crops. • History The City of Temecula experiences extreme temperatures on an annual basis. In most instances, the events are short in duration and do not create significant impacts on the community. Some of the minor events do require the City to act including dissemination of Public Ser vice Announcements, checking in with vulnerable populations (elderly, homeless), and opening and/or coordinate with others to open cooling centers. Some of the more significant extreme weather events in the region include: • In August of 2022, an extreme heat event occurred impacting the Southwestern Region of Riverside County which includes Temecula. • In September of 2020, a severe early-September heat wave challenged record high temperatures across the region with local communities recording record high temperatures. • Probability In any given year Temecula could experience extreme heat events. • Climate Change Considerations Climate plays a significant role in Excessive Heat events. As temperatures rise and fall due to changing conditions, Californians will face greater possibility of Extreme Heat . By mid‐century, extreme heat events in urban centers could cause two to three times more heat‐related deaths than occur today. By 2100, The California Energy Commission is projecting hotter temperatures are expected throughout the state, with an increase of 3 to 5.5°F under the lower emissions scenario and 8 to 10.5°F under the higher emissions scenario (Figure 5.9). Figure 5.9 – Comparison between Historic and Projected Temperatures (2009) Page|87 According to the EPA and CDC, the chances are increasing that an Extreme Heat event could happen where you live because, the average temperatures are rising, both in the United States and around the world: ✓ Globally, the annual average temperature has been rising since the beginning of the 20th century, and temperatures are expected to continue to rise through the end of this century. ✓ Worldwide, 15 of the 16 warmest years on record have occurred since 2000, with the exception of 1998 5.4.1.6 Fire (Wildfire) • Ranking: Probability – High; Impact - High • Description Wildfires can be started by natural and mad-made causes. There are three (3) different classes of wild land or wildfires: 1) surface; 2) ground; and 3) crown. A “Surface fire” is the most common type and burns along the floor of a forest, moving slowly and killing or damaging trees. A “Ground fire”; usually started by lightning, are fed by subterranean roots, and smolder on or below the forest floor. A “Crown fire” spread rapidly by wind and move quickly by umping along the tops of trees. Wildfires can be classified as either a wildland fire or a wildland -urban interface (WUI) fire. Wildland fires involve situations where a fire occurs in an area that is relatively undeveloped except for the possible existence of basic infrastructure such as roads and power lines. A WUI fire includes situations in which a wildland fire enters an area that is developed with structures and other human developments. In WUI fires, the fire is fueled by both naturally occurring vegetation and the urban structural elements themselves. According to the National Fire Plan issued by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Interior, the wildland -urban interface is defined as “…the line, area, or zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland or vegetative fuels.” The WUI fire can be subdivided into three (3) categories (NWUIFPP, 1998): 1) classic wildland - urban interface; 2) the mixed wildland-urban interface; and 3) the occluded wildland-urban interface. The classic wildland-urban interface exists where well-defined urban and suburban development presses up against open expanses of wildland areas. The mixed wildland-urban interface is characterized by isolated homes, subdivisions, and small communities situated predominantly in wildland settings. The occluded wildland- urban interface exists where islands of wildland vegetation occur inside a largely urbanized area. Generally, many of the areas at risk within the City of Temecula fall into the classic wildland-urban interface category. Certain conditions must be present for a wildfire hazard to occur; a large source of fuel must be present, the weather must be conducive (generally hot, dry, and windy), and fire suppression sources must not be able to easily suppress and control the fire. The cause of a majority of Page|88 wildfires is human-induced or lightning; however, once burning, wildfire behavior is based on three (3) primary factors: 1) fuel; 2) topography; and 3) weather. Fuel will affect the potential size and behavior of a wildfire depending on the amount present, its burning qualities (e.g., level of moisture), and its horizontal and vertical continuity. Topography affects the movement of air, and thus the fire, over the ground surface. The terrain can also change the speed at which the fire travels, and the ability of firefighters to reach and extinguish the fire. Weather as manifested in temperature, humidity, and wind (both short and long term) affect the probability, severity, and duration of wildfires. Other factors that create concern are drought conditions and development (the build environment). Drought conditions bring on contributing concerns in that it can lead to relatively drier conditions and leave reservoirs and water tables lower; thus, creating hotter fires and less water to fight the fires. The expansion of the built environment into previously unoccupied areas introduces more people to the hazard and in some cases make response actions more challenging. • Location and Extent The climate, topography, and vegetation in Temecula is conducive to annual wildfire events. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program (CDF-FRAP) was established and mandated to map areas of significant fire hazards based on fuels (vegetation), terrain, weather, and other relevant factors. These zones, referred to as Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ), define the application of various mitigation strategies to reduce risk associated with wildland fires. CDF-FRAP developed data that displays the relative risk to areas of significant population density from wildfire. This data is created by intersecting residential housing unit density with proximate fire threat, to give a relative measure of potential loss of structures and threats to public safety from wildfire. The map below (shown on next page) depicts the “very high” Fire Hazard Severity Zone(s) located in Temecula for state and local responsibility areas (Figure 5.10). Page|89 Figure 5.10 – Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Response Area (LRA) (2022) Due to a combination of topography, weather, and fuel, and exacerbated by potentially high winds and limited access, the western portion of the City of Temecula is highly susceptible to wildland fire hazards. The slopes of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, the hills between Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway are not only difficult for firefighters and their equipment to reach, but the hill’s steepness and configuration can result in the rapid upslope spread of fire. Limited rainfall, low humidity, and seasonal high temperatures continue to contribute to the desiccation of the grasses and chaparral which cover the foothills, providing prime fuel for intense burns. Although some of the canyons are shielded from the direct impact of the powerful, dry Santa Ana winds, their occurrence generally aggravates the fire hazard. In addition, the presence of human activities in or near a wildland area dramatically increases the risk of a major fire due to careless smokers, homeless encampments, illegal campfires, and other related risks. • History Page|90 Historically, fires in the City of Temecula have started in either the creek beds and burn from a western to easterly direction, driven by prevailing winds and topography or above the city in the hills of the unincorporated area of DeLuz. Table 5.3 shows the year and acres of reported wildfires in the City of Temecula since 2000. Table 5.3 – Recent Fires Occurring in or around the City of Temecula (2000-2022) (2022) Name Acres Year Fairview * 28,307 2022 Meadows 5 2022 Creek 2 2022 Rainbow .25 2020 Eagle Fire * 8,900 2004 Mountain * 9,898 2003 Pechanga * 11,734 2000 *Denotes fires occurring in the local vicinity with a direct impact on the community • Probability The majority of work done to estimate the probability of wildfire occurrence has been around identifying the potential areas for wildfire to occur. As previously mentioned, vegetation, weather, and topography were the significant elements in identifying areas of potential threat to wildfire occurrences. The area south and west of the City of Temecula is marked by mountains, foothills, and canyons that are covered in susceptible vegetation. A large amount of the native vegetation in the Temecula area is commonly called chaparral, it is a dense and scrubby bush that has evolved to persist in a fire-prone habitat. Chaparral plants will eventually age and die; however, they will not be replaced by new growth until a fire rejuvenates the area. Chamise, manzanita and ceanothus are all examples of chaparral which are quite common in the Temecula area. The City of Temecula’s climate, with its warm and dry summers, contributes to low relative humidity and low fuel moistures. When combined with high fuel loading, the potential for a catastrophic wildfire event is significant. Three (3) weather conditions specific to Temecula that may cause the ignition and/or impact the behavior of wildfires are as follows: • Thunderstorms and the associated lightning are a significant source of fire starts, and usually occurs mid to late summer • High winds can become steady up to 20 mph and gust up to 30 -40 mph throughout the year but are most likely to exacerbate wildland fires during the months of August through October when dry vegetation conditions are generally present • Hot, dry conditions most commonly occur in August and September This knowledge and understanding are a key driver in the methodology of the CDF-FRAP program. According to the CDF, the F AP “very high” Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps are based on data and models of, potential fuels over a 30- to 50-year time horizon and their associated expected Page|91 fire behavior and expected burn probabilities to quantify the likelihood and nature of vegetation fore exposure to buildings. This indicates a very high likelihood of wildfire occurrence in the area. As such, Temecula is susceptible to annual wildfire risk. An aspect of wildfires that needs greater consideration within the City of Temecula is man-made caused wildfires. Over the past few years, the City has noticed an increase in the number of wildfires started by arsonists, illegal homeless encampments, and improper use of fireworks. All of these factors have increased the probability of wildfires in the City. • Climate Change Considerations Climate change plays a significant role in wildfire hazards. The changing conditions from wet to dry can create more fuel; the increased possibility of high winds increase risk and present a challenge, and drought conditions could hinder ability to contain fires. Large wildfires also have several indirect effects beyond those of a smaller, local fire. These may include air quality and health issues, road closures, business closures, and other forms of losses. Furthermore, large wildfires increase the threat of other disasters such as landslide and flooding. 5.4.1.7 Flooding • Ranking: Probability – High; Impact - Medium • Description A flood is a temporary condition (short-duration or long-duration) of partial or complete inundation on land that is normally dry. This condition is generally caused by precipitation (i.e., rainfall). Several factors determine the severity of floods, including rainfall intensity and duration, antecedent moisture conditions, surface permeability, and geographic characteristics of the watershed such as shape and slope. Other causes of flooding can include a ruptured dam or levee, rapid ice or snow melting in the mountains, under-engineered infrastructure, or even a poorly placed beaver dam can overwhelm a river or channel and send water spreading over adjacent land or floodplains. According to FEMA, there are several different types of floods and u nder some there are subtypes. The flooding types and subtypes include: • Riverine Flooding- River/Stream Overbank Flooding, Flash Floods, Dam and Levee Failure, Alluvia Fans, Ice Jam Flooding, Moveable Bed Streams • Urban Drainage- Drainage system capacity deficiencies • Ground Failures- Mud flood and Mud flows, Subsidence, Liquefaction • Fluctuating Lake Levels- Increase volume caused by rain, snowmelt, and other runoffs • Coastal Flooding and Erosion- Storm Surge In California, some of the more common types of flooding fall under Riverine Flooding (i.e., flash flooding), Urban Flooding, and Coastal Flooding (i.e., storm surge). Floods can take several hours to days to develop. A flash flood is a flood occurring in a watershed where the time of travel of Page|92 the peak of flow from one end of the watershed to the other is less than six hours. Coastal flooding occurs when storms produce large ocean waves that sweep across coastlines making landfall. The following flood characterization designates the amount of time for response: • Flood Watch- a flood is possible in the area. Advanced warning • Flood Warning- flooding is already occurring or will occur soon in the area. • Flash Flood Watch- a flash flood is possible in the area. Little-to-no advanced warning • Flash Flood Warning- flooding is already occurring or will occur soon in the area. Little- to-no advanced warning • Location and Extent The geographical location, climate, and topography of the City of Temecula make the city prone to flooding. In Temecula, floods usually occur during the winter “wet” season, the time of year with the highest precipitation totals or heavy rainfalls. During significant rainfall years, the season is characterized by high intensity rainfalls and rapid runoffs or discharge. These storm events have inundated streams; flooded areas; created debris flows (i.e., sediment, rock, dead trees) that have plugged culverts and damaged bridges/overpasses; and/or, eroded or scared the landscape. The common types of flooding in the City of Temecula are: • Flash Flood- A flash flood is a rapid flooding of low-lying areas, rivers and streams that is caused by the intense rainfall associated with a thunderstorm, or multiple thunderstorms. Flash floods also occur when a man-made structure, such as a dam, collapses. Flash flooding occurs when the ground under a storm becomes saturated with water so quickly that it cannot be absorbed. The runoff collects in low-lying areas and flows rapidly downhill. As a result, anything in its path is suddenly in rising water. A typical flash flood begins with a slow -moving thunderstorm. This usually takes longer to move out of the affected areas and causes the area to endure a greater amount of rainfall for a longer period of time. In addition, a thunderstorm may pass over an affected area repeatedly, dumping even more rainfall. A large amount of rainfall in a short time can result in flash flood conditions, as can a dam failure or other sudden spill. The National Weather Service’s definition of a flash flood is a flood occurring in a watershed where the time of travel of the peak of flow from one end of the watershed to the other is less than six hours. • Urban Drainage- The heavy rainfall associated with these storm systems contributes to urban flooding in a number of ways. Primarily, heavy rainfall will often overwhelm the capacity of the conventional drainage system made up of storm drains, catch basins, sewers, and additional natural mechanisms for storm- water management. These systems typically cannot handle more than one or two inches of rainfall per hour before they begin to backup and overflow. This amount is further diminished if the storm drains, and other components of the storm- Page|93 water management system, have not been adequately maintained, are clogged with debris such as trash or natural waste, or are old and in a state of disrepair. Heavy rainfall, combined with storm-water runoff, can cause local waterways to rise and overflow their banks. • History The City of Temecula has had a long history with heavy rains. The possibility of flood for the city stems from its location between two major drainage channels: the Murrieta Creek to the north and west of the city and the Temecula Creek on the south end. Both channels come together to form the Santa Margarita River in the southwest corner of the city. The last major flood experienced from these two creeks was in 1993. The city has taken steps to control flooding through vegetation reduction, creek maintenance, and bridge upkeep. While not always a significant event, floods inundate portions of the City of Temecula almost every year. These smaller flood events create issues for local residents and business with everything from traffic congestion to localized water damage. Most of the smaller flood events do not rise to the level of significance (i.e., requiring local, county, state, or federal declarations) and do not require activation of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC). The City has not experienced a significant flood event since 2019. The significant flood events have been known to create considerable impacts. During some significant flood events the flood waters from the Temecula/Murrieta Creek were responsible for extensive damage to Old Town Temecula, ranging from severe ponding to high flood waters, to extensive, permanent damages from uncontrollable runoff. The following information provides a summary of the available historic significant flooding events in the City of Temecula: • FEMA 4431-DR-CA: (February 2019) The City of Temecula sustained more than $130,000 in damages and costs associated with emergency repair and debris removal. The amounts included salaries, benefits, overtime and other professional and contractual services for repairs and maintenance supplies. The southern portion of the city along highway 79 south (Temecula Parkway) is subject to a 100 - year flood, meaning that a flood of that intensity might occur once in one hundred years (1% chance of occurring in any given year). Considering these features and other factors, FEMA has developed Flood Hazard Maps. The most common flood hazard map is the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100-year flood zone map (Figure 5.11). The 100-year flood zone map (utilizing FEMA flood hazard zones) depicts areas within the City of Temecula that may be prone to flooding. Definitions of FEMA’s flood zone designations are provided in Table 5.4. Page|94 Figure 5.11 – Temecula 100 Year Flood Map (2022) Page|95 Table 5.4 – FEMA Flood Zone Designations • Probability Flooding tends to occur in the summer and early fall because of the monsoon and is typified by increased humidity and high summer temperatures. The standard measure for flooding is the "100-year flood", a benchmark used by the FEMA to establish a standard of flood control in communities throughout the country. The 100-year flood is also referred to as the "regulatory" or "base" flood. The term 100-year flood is often incorrectly used and can be misleading. The correct designation is “the 1% annual chance flood”, meaning there is a 1% chance that a flood of that intensity and elevation will occur in any given year, not that the flood will occur once every hundred years. The 100-year Flood map of the City of Temecula is shown in Figure 5.11 above. As defined by FEMA, Zone A, AE, AE Floodway, AH, and AO (lighter shades of blue) indicate a 1% annual chance of flooding, while Zone Shaded X (dark blue) indicates a 0.2% of annual chance of flooding. Page|96 • Climate Change Considerations Climate change acts as an amplifier to flood hazards. Extreme weather events have become more frequent over the past 40 to 50 years and this trend is projected to continue. Rising sea levels and shifting weather patterns (temperate, winds) are expected to have a significant impa ct on rainfall frequency, intensity, and distribution, which in turn will have a significant impact on the frequency of flood occurrences. Additionally, warmer weather patterns increase snowmelt, which in turn produces more runoff to the lower elevations. 5.4.1.8 Hazardous Materials Incident • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - High • Description Hazardous materials are any substance or combination of substances that may pose a risk to human health and safety or the environment. Hazardous materials include toxic, corrosive, infectious, flammable, explosive and radioactive substances. Federal, state , and local governments have enacted a variety of laws and established programs to deal with the transport, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials to reduce the risks to the public health and environment. Hazardous materials incidents can happen anywhere and at any time, however, there are certain areas within the city that are at a higher risk than others. Roadways and railways that are used to transport hazardous materials have increasing potential as well as industrial facilities that use, store, and dispose of such materials. Releases of explosive, caustic, and flammable materials can cause many injuries and deaths as well as large-scale evacuations to sheltering-in-place. Hazardous materials are used and/or created in manufacturing, agriculture, service industries (e.g., gas stations, dry cleaners), and health care facilities. Several household products such as cleaning supplies and paint are also considered hazardous materials. These chemicals and hazardous materials may be corrosive or otherwise damaging over time. The US Department of Transportation (US DOT) classifies hazard chemicals/materials into the following classification system: ✓ Class 1- Explosives ✓ Class 2- Flammable, non-flammable, and poisonous gases ✓ Class 3- Flammable liquids ✓ Class 4- Flammable, spontaneously combustible, and dangerous when wet solids ✓ Class 5- Oxidizers and organic peroxides ✓ Class 6- Toxic (poisonous) substances ✓ Class 7- Radioactive materials ✓ Class 8- Corrosive substances ✓ Class 9- Miscellaneous dangerous goods/hazardous materials and articles Page|97 The release of these chemicals and/or materials into a community can have devastating effects. A hazardous materials release could also result in public health risks, fires, and/or explosions. Contamination may be carried out of the immediate area of the incident by people, vehicles, wind, and water. Weather conditions can increase the size and intensity of the Hazardous Materials Release. Typography, such as hills and canyons, can increase the size of the release or make it more difficult to contain. There are several types of hazardous materials releases: ✓ Fixed-Site Releases- releases involving the production and manufacturing, handling, and storage of a hazardous product at a single facility as well as any releases that may occur at a designated hazardous waste disposal site. ✓ Transportation-Related Releases- Includes releases that occur while the hazardous material is in transit from one facility to another or en route to be disposed of at a designated hazardous waste disposal site (e.g., on highways, railways, airports, or in pipelines). ✓ Intentional Releases- includes criminal acts and acts of terrorism in which a hazardous material is used to intentionally cause injuries and/or fatalities, damage the environment and/or property, or advance a political or social agenda. • Location and Extent As outlined above, hazardous materials can be found throughout the community. The location and identity of facilities that store hazardous materials must be reported to local and federal governments as required by the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA). Many facilities have their own hazardous materials guides and response plans, including transportation companies who transport hazardous materials. The release of hazardous materials into the environment can cause a multitude of problems. Although these incidents can happen almost anywhere, certain areas of Redlands are at higher risk, such as near roadways that are frequently used to transport hazardous materials and locations with industrial facilities that use, store, and/or dispose of such materials. Areas crossed by railways, waterways, airways, and pipelines also have increased potential for mishaps. • History Within the City of Temecula, the CALFire / Riverside County Fire Department has the responsibility for responding to hazardous materials incidents. The City of Temecula Fire Division has responded to a series of hazardous material incidents over the years. While most are routine in nature and do not require significant resources, there have been a handful of incidents that have required greater response and recovery coordination/effort. • Probability The release of chemicals and hazardous materials can occur anywhere in the cit y but are more likely on or near major transportation corridors. Incidences can occur during production, storage, transportation, and/or during use or disposal of materials. Communities can be at risk if a Page|98 chemical is used unsafely or released in harmful amounts into the environment. Hazardous materials can cause death, serious injury, long lasting health effects, and damage to buildings, the environment, homes, and other property. • Climate Change Considerations While there is little evidence to link climate change increase occurrences of chemical and hazardous material releases, weather plays a significant factor in certain aspects of chemical and hazardous material releases. Changing conditions can create more mishaps and accidents with production, storage, transportation, use, and disposal of chemicals and hazardous materials. Additionally, changing conditions could impact the response and recovery efforts after releases. 5.4.1.9 Pandemic • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - High • Description Infectious Disease is a broad term used to describe illness caused by a specific type of bacterium, parasite, virus, or fungus organisms. Below is a brief overview of the main infectious disease types: • Bacterial Infections- Responsible for a variety of diseases from strep throat to meningitis and tuberculosis. • Fungal Infections- There are roughly 300 types of fungi known to cause infectious disease. Common types include ringworm, blastomycosis, histoplasmosis, and pneumocystis pneumonia. • Parasitic Infections- Responsible for a variety of diseases including malaria, Chagas disease, and toxocariasis. • Viral Infections- Responsible for a variety of diseases including the common cold, influenza, mononucleosis, smallpox, and HIV/AIDS. These organisms can be transmitted: • Person-to-person (e.g., measles, mumps, meningococcal disease, tuberculosis) • By consuming contaminated food or water, also known as foodborne (e.g.: salmonella, E.coli, botulinum toxin) • Through animal bites (i.e., mosquito, ticks, fleas) also known as vector-borne (e.g.: West Nile virus, dengue, Zika, malaria). Newly emerging infectious diseases include Ebola, Zika, Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), avian influenza. The current pandemic (COVID- 19) is linked to the SARS virus. The SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a virus identified in 2003. SARS-CoV is thought to be an animal virus from an as-yet-uncertain animal reservoir, perhaps bats, that spread to other animals (civet cats) and first infected humans in the Guangdong province of southern China in 2002. In 2019, in Wuhan China a new coronavirus was discovered. The coronavirus is closely related to the SARS coronavirus. The new virus goes by both COVID - 19, standing for coronavirus disease 2019, and SARS CoV-2. Additional detail about the impacts of the COVID 19 can be found under the History section. Page|99 Also, of concern are the threats of potential biological terrorism (bioterrorism), the intentional release or spread of disease (or toxins). Bioterrorism, also known as biological warfare, is not new and has been used for centuries. As early as 600 BC, military leaders have implemented practices to poison water supplies and infect citizens/soldiers to gain strategic advantages in their efforts to conquer territories. Today there have been occurrences are both at the large scale (by military) and small scale (by terrorist organizations or individuals). No matter the purpose, the release of organisms could have devastating effects on an international, national, state, or local level if it is a highly infectious disease. • Location and Extent An emergent disease can occur throughout the entire city at any given time during the year. • History Infectious diseases have been of concern for many years. It is only recently, because of COVID- 19 that the potential risk has been heightened. As cited by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 20th century saw three (3) pandemics, the most notable of which was the 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic that was responsible for 20 million deaths throughout the world. The pandemics are now known to represent three (3) different antigenic subtypes of influenza A virus: H1N1 (in 1918), H2N2 (Asian Influenza in 1957), and H3N2 (Hong Kong Influenza in 1968). Not classified as true pandemics are three (3) notable epidemics: a pseudo pandemic in 1947 with low death rates, an epidemic in 1977 that was a pandemic in children, and an abortive epidemic of swine influenza in 1976 that was feared to have pandemic potential. Major influenza epidemics show no predictable periodicity or pattern, and all differ from one another. Evidence suggests that true pandemics with changes in hemagglutinin subtypes arise fr om genetic reassortment with animal influenza A viruses. The world is still dealing with the rolling effects of COVID-19 and identified sub-types. According to the CDC, COVID-19 was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. Although most people who have COVID-19 have mild symptoms, COVID-19 can also cause severe illness and even death. Some groups, including older adults and people who have certain underlying medical conditions, are at increased risk of severe illness. Because it is a new virus, scientists are learning more and more about it each day. New cases of and death rates from COVID-19 are rising globally daily but not at the rate it was during 2020 and 2021. Locally, the City of Temecula was impacted by COVID-19 both from an economic and community- based standpoint. Other infectious disease events that have impacted the city and operational area include the 2009 H1N1, 2003 Avian Flu, 2015-17 Zika, 2014-16 West African Ebola, 2015 West Nile, 2013 large scale Tuberculosis, 2004 botulism Type A, 2003 West Nile, and the 2020 Hepatitis A outbreak. Page|100 • Probability There is an annual risk of experiencing an infectious disease outbreak in the City of Temecula. While there is a continued threat from a novel influenza virus , the potential threat of outbreaks and epidemics have been increased due expanding global trade and accessible national and international travel. Infectious disease outbreaks and epidemics occur on an ongoing basis. Aside from the City of Temecula currently recovering from the effects from COVID-19, annual outbreaks of the seasonal flu usually occur during the late fall through early spring. Most people have natural immunity, and a seasonal flu vaccine is generally available. According to the CDC, in a typical year, approximately 5 to 20 percent of the population gets the seasonal flu and flu - related deaths range from 3,300 to 48,600 (average 23,600). Bird flu (H5N1) is an influenza A virus subtype that is highly contagious among birds; although rare, some human infections with the Bird flu virus have occurred. Most confirmed cases have occurred in Asia, Africa, the Pacific, Europe, and the Near East. According to the CDC, there are currently no confirmed human cases of Bird flu infections, but it remains a serious concern with the potential to cause a deadly pandemic. Swine flu (H1N1) was first detected in the United States in April 2009. This virus was a unique combination of influenza virus genes never previously identified in either animals or people. The Swine flu virus caused more illness in young people and pregnant women than is usual for prior flu seasons and was declared a Worldwide Pandemic by the World Health Organization. • Climate Change Considerations While many vector-borne diseases, such as malaria, yellow fever, dengue, and murine typhus, are rarely seen in the United States, the United States is susceptible to these vector-borne diseases. Many vector-borne diseases are climate sensitive and ecological shifts associated with climate change are expected to impact the distribution and incidences of these diseases. Changes in temperature and precipitation directly affect vector born disease transmission through pathogen-host interaction, and indirectly through ecosystem changes and species composition. As temperatures increases vectors can spread into new areas that were previously too cold. For example, two (2) mosquito vectors that carry malaria are now found at the U.S.-Mexico border. 5.4.1.10 Transportation Failure • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - High • Description Transportation systems in or near Temecula include airways and roadways. These systems provide services on a regional and local level. A major accident is possible with these two methods of transportation through the city. Large accidents are investigated by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is an independent Federal agency charged by Congress with investigating every civil aviation accident in the United States and significant accidents in the other modes of transportation – railroad, highway, marine and pipeline – and Page|101 issuing safety recommendations aimed at preventing future accidents. The Safety Board determines the probable cause of: • All U.S. civil aviation accidents and certain public-use aircraft accidents • Selected highway accidents • Railroad accidents involving passenger trains or any train accident that results in at least one fatality or major property damage • Major marine accidents and any marine accident involving a public and nonpublic vessel • Pipeline accidents involving a fatality or substantial property damage • Releases of hazardous materials in all forms of transportation • Selected transportation accidents that involve problems of a recurring nature Since its inception in 1967, the NTSB has investigated more than 132,000 aviation accidents and thousands of surface transportation accidents. The trucking industry has consistently increased in size over the last century. Today, there are more trucks on the road than 20 years ago. “In 2000, one out of every eight fatal car accidents involved a large truck. This can be attributed not only to the size and weight of these trucks but also to significant blind spots in the field of view of truck drivers (Trucking Accident Info Center, 2003).” According to the .S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), on average in the country and as of 2020, large trucks made up 9 percent of all vehicles involved in fatal crashes. The NHTSA says that large trucks were much more likely to be involved in a fatal multiple-vehicle crash. In 2020, The NHTSA reported that there were 4,965 people killed in crashes involving large trucks. This was a 1 percent decrease from 5,032 in 2019. 71 percent of all people killed in large truck crashes in 2020 were occupants of other vehicles. 17 percent were occupants of large trucks and 13 percent were non-occupants (pedestrians, cyclists, or other non-occupants). Since 2002, 13,966 fatalities were attributed to large trucks. Over a 10-year period, there was an unfortunate increase in the total number of people killed in large truck crashes, from 3,781 fatalities in 2011 to 4,965 fatalities in 2020. Of the fatalities in 2020: • 71 percent (3,512) were occupants of other vehicles • 17 percent (831) were occupants of large trucks • 13 percent (622) were non-occupants (pedestrians, pedal cyclists, etc.) From 2019 to 2020, there was a 7-percent decrease in the number of occupants of other vehicles killed in crashes involving large trucks. This is the first decrease in large-truck occupants killed, and occupants of other vehicles killed since 2013 to 2014. From 2019 to 2020 there was a 9 - percent increase in the number of non-occupants killed. The 622 killed is large truck crashes in 2020 is the highest number of non-occupants killed in the most recent 10-year period. Page|102 The chart below (Figure 5.12) shows 2020 Data collected by NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis. Figure 5.12 – People Killed & Injured in Crashes Involving Large Trucks / Crash Type (2020) The concern with an airplane crash in the City of Temecula is the potential for human casualties. A disabled aircraft striking the ground could result in explosions and fire. Temecula would need to address the medical needs as well as the mental health needs of victims and their families. • Location and Extent The City of Temecula is located within Riverside County and is served by one major freeway from the south, Interstate 15, and splits at the north end of the city into Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. All freeways run north and south through Temecula and serves as a major corridor from San Diego County to Los Angeles and Las Vegas. The closest airfield to Temecula is oper ated by the French Valley Airport Economic Development Agency. The French Valley Airport is located in Southwest Riverside County adjacent to the communities of Temecula, Murrieta, and Winchester. The airport is located on Highway 79 and is only minutes aw ay from Interstates 15 and 215 which is Northeast of Temecula. The flight operations present a potential risk for air crashes. The greatest risk is immediately under the takeoff and landing zone located at the south end of the airfield which is adjacent to the Somers Bend development. Page|103 • History In June of 2018, a major crash involving a large truck, resulted in a 10-hour closure creating chaos on the freeway with traffic backing up for miles. The driver attempted to bring his truck to a stop when vehicles in front of him collided, but he could not and clipped the car causing his truck to veer across all lanes of traffic and drove through a guardrail and partially plunged down an embankment at the Temecula Creek. Fortunately, there were no deaths as a result of the crash. (Temecula Patch, 2022) In November of 2021, a small privately owned aircraft enroute to the French Valley Airport crashed in a field just yards from a major housing development resulting in the death of the pilot. There was no damage to property beside the plan itself (Press Enterprise, 2022). • Probability The possibility of an aircraft accident/incident occurring or major transportation accident/incident on the freeway in the City of Temecula will continue to exist due to the location (and existing use) of the French Valley Airport and the I-15 Freeway. Based on historic events and known increases in safety standards, it is anticipated that future accidents/incidents will be minimal. The risk to the City of Temecula associated with these types of accidents/incidents is similar to other general aviation airports in Southern California as well as freeways across the nation. The issue is the fact that the current state of frontage roads and other routes of transportation from San Diego County into Riverside County increase the prob ability and dangers. • Climate Change Considerations While there are many devices that monitor and/or track weather conditions, it is expected that changing conditions are going to impact air travel but not affect ground transportation as heavily. From the simplest of impacts from temperatures altering takeoffs and landing, to increase in rains and winds altering flight patterns, changes in our environment could increase the likelihood of an aircraft accidents/incidents. Page|104 5.4.2 Other Hazards of Significance For the purposes of this LHMP, the following hazards are detailed as they are significant to the City of Temecula and pertinent to the local area. 5.4.2.1 Tornado (Windstorm) • Ranking: Probability – Low; Impact - High • Description Winds are often referred to according to their strength, and the direction from which they are blowing. Wind is caused by the difference in pressure from one point on the earth's surface to another. Wind is created by air moving from the area of “higher” pressure to the area of “lower” pressure; the difference in pressure over a certain distance, determines the strength of the wind. Air does not move directly from the point of highest pressure to the point of lowest pressure. The earth's rotation affects the air flow by deflecting it to the right. This effect is called the Coriolis Effect. In the Northern Hemisphere, this causes air to flow clockwise around high -pressure areas and counterclockwise around low-pressure areas. Winds are categorized by types and each type is associated with wind speeds: breeze (<0 -31 mph), gale (32-65 mph), storm (66-72 mph), and hurricane (73-139> mph). Within each category are sub classifications with differential names depending on geographic locat ion (i.e., tropical depression, tropical storm/cyclone) and/or categories (i.e., category 3 hurricane). Damage from winds account for half of all severe reports in the lower 48 states and is more common than damage from tornadoes. Winds are also measured using the Beaufort Scale. The Beaufort Scale categories winds by wind speed, using Force categories between 0-12 to measure speed and summarize descriptions (Table 5.5). Table 5.5 – Beaufort Scale Category (Force) Speed (MPH) Description Wind Effects 0 < 1 Calm Smoke rises vertically and the sea is flat. 1 1 - 3 Light Air The direction of the wind is shown by drifting smoke but not wind vanes. 2 4 - 7 Light Breeze Wind is felt on the face, leaves rustle and wind vanes move. Small wavelets appear on the ocean but do not break. 3 8 - 12 Gentle Breeze Leaves and small twigs are in motion and light flags extend. Large wavelets appear on the ocean and crests begin to break. 4 13 - 18 Moderate Breeze Dust and loose paper become airborne and small branches move. Small waves appear on the ocean. 5 19 - 24 Fresh Breeze Small trees begin to sway and moderate waves appear. Page|105 Category (Force) Speed (MPH) Description Wind Effects 6 25 - 31 Strong Breeze Large branches are in motion and holding an umbrella becomes difficult. Large waves begin to form. 7 32 - 38 Near Gale Whole trees are in motion and walking against the wind can be hard. Foam from breaking waves is blown in streaks. 8 39 - 46 Gale Walking is difficult and twigs break off trees. 9 47 - 54 Severe Gale There is slight structural damage, and the crests of waves begin to topple. 10 55 - 63 Storm Trees are uprooted and there is considerable damage to structures. Very high waves form in long, overhanging crests. 11 63 - 72 Violent Storm There is widespread structural damage, exceptionally high waves form, and the ocean is completely covered in foam. 12 > 73 Hurricane There is devastating structural damage. On the ocean the air is filled with foam and spray. For the purposes of the LHMP, windstorms include both 1) cyclonic winds and 2) significant straight-line, with little-to-no precipitation. Cyclonic winds are the wind which swirl counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere or clockwise in the southern hemisphere. The biggest differences between hurricanes and tornadoes are how big they are and how long they last. Hurricanes are typically hundreds of miles in diameter, with high winds and heavy rains over the entire region. Hurricanes can last for days or even weeks. Tornadoes usually last no more than a few minutes. • Hurricane- A rotating low-pressure weather system (storm) that has organized thunderstorms but no fronts (a boundary separating two air masses of different densities. Hurricanes originate in the Atlantic basin, which includes the Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico, the eastern North Pacific Ocean, and, less frequently, the central North Pacific Ocean. Hurricanes develop in stages, working their way up to hurricane status: ✓ Tropical Wave- A low-pressure trough moving generally westward with the trade winds. ✓ Tropical Disturbance- An organized area of thunderstorms that usually forms in the tropics. Typically, they maintain their identity for 24 hours and are accompanied by heavy rains and gusty winds. ✓ Tropical Cyclone- A generic term for any organized low pressure that develops over tropical and sometimes sub-tropical waters. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all example of tropical cyclones. Page|106 ✓ Tropical Depression- An organized area of low pressure in which sustained winds are 38 mph or less. ✓ Tropical Storm- A tropical cyclone with maximum sustained wind speeds that range from 39 to 73 mph. ✓ Hurricane- A tropical cyclone with sustained winds of at least 74 mph. After the storm reaches Hurricane status, the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale is used to categorizes hurricanes by sustained wind speeds (Table 5.6). Table 5.6 - Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale Category Winds (MPH) Damage Description 1 74 - 95 Minimal Well-constructed frame homes could have damage to roof, shingles, vinyl siding and gutters. Large branches of trees will snap, and shallowly rooted trees may be toppled. Extensive damage to power lines and poles likely will result in power outages that could last a few to several days. 2 96 - 110 Moderate Well-constructed frame homes could sustain major roof and siding damage. Many shallowly rooted trees will be snapped or uprooted and block numerous roads. Near-total power loss is expected with outage that could last from several days to weeks. 3 111 - 129 Extensive Well-built framed homes may incur major damage or removal of roof decking and gable ends. Many trees will be snapped or uprooted, blocking numerous roads. Electricity and water will be unavailable for several days to weeks after the storm passes. 4 130 - 156 Extreme Well-built framed homes can sustain severe damage with loss of most of the roof structure and/or some exterior walls. Most trees will be snapped or uprooted, and power poles downed. Fallen trees and power poles will isolate residential areas. Power outages will last weeks to possibly months. Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. 5 > 156 Catastrophic A high percentage of framed homes will be destroyed, with total roof failure and wall collapse. Fallen trees and power poles will isolate residential areas. Power outages will last for weeks to possibly months. Most of the area will be uninhabitable for weeks or months. Page|107 ✓ Tornado- A tornado is a rapidly (violent) rotating column of air that is in contact with both the surface of the Earth and a cumulonimbus cloud or, in rare cases, the base of a cumulus cloud. Tornadoes come in many shapes and sizes and are often visible in the form of a condensation funnel originating from the base of a cumulonimbus cloud, with a cloud of rotating debris and dust beneath it. Most tornadoes have wind speeds less than 110 miles per hour, are about 250 feet across, and travel a few miles before dissipating. The most violent tornadoes are capable of tremendous destruction with wind speeds of up to 300 mph. They can destroy large buildings, uproot trees, and throw vehicles hundreds of yards. They can also drive straw into trees. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide to 50 miles long. Most tornadoes form from thunderstorms. They need warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico and cool, dry air from Canada. When these two air masses meet, they create instability in the atmosphere. A change in wind direction and an increase in wind speed with increasing height creates an invisible, horizontal spinning effect in the lower atmosphere. Rising air within the updraft tilts the rotating air from horizontal to vertical. An area of rotation, 2-6 miles wide, now extends through much of the storm. Most strong and violent tornadoes form within this area of strong rotation. Tornadoes are measured by the Fujita Tornado Scale (Table 5.7) which classifies tornadoes by intensity categories, based on the maximum winds occurring within the funnel. Table 5.7 - Fujita Tornado Scale Page|108 Straight-line winds are common with the gust front of a thunderstorm or originate with a downburst from a thunderstorm. The winds can gust to 130 mph and winds of 58 mph or more and can last for more than twenty minutes. Straight-line wind events are most common during the spring when instability is highest and weather fronts routinely cross the country. These storms have wind speeds capable of reaching up to 100 mph, capable of producing a path of damage extending for hundreds of miles. Terms and characteristics of damaging straight -line wind events include: ✓ Derecho- Derechos, Spanish for “straight”, are a widespread, long -lived, straight-line windstorm event that is associated with a land -based, fast-moving group of severe thunderstorms. Derechos can cause hurricane-force winds, tornadoes, heavy rains, and flash floods. A warm-weather phenomenon, derechos occur mostly in summer, especially during June, July, and August. ✓ Updrafts/Downdraft- Localized regions of warm or cool air will exhibit vertical movement (updrafts downdrafts). pdrafts are small‐scale current of rising air, often within a cloud. A mass of warm air will typically be less dense than the surrounding region, and so will rise until it reaches air that is either warmer or less dense than itself. The converse will occur for a mass of cool air and is known as subsidence. This movement of large volumes of air, especially when regions of hot, wet air rise, can create large clouds, and is the central source of thunderstorms. Drafts can also be conceived by low or high-pressure regions. A low-pressure region will attract air from the surrounding area, which will move towards the center and then rise, creating an updraft. A high-pressure region will then attract air from the surrounding area, which will move towards the center and sink, spawning a downdraft. ✓ Downburst- Strong, downdraft winds flowing out of a thunderstorm cell. A downburst is a straight- direction surface wind in excess of 39 miles per hour caused by a small-scale, strong downdraft from the base of convective thundershowers and thunderstorms. Downbursts of all sizes descend from the upper regions of severe thunderstorms when the air accelerates downward through either exceptionally strong evaporative cooling or by very heavy rain, which drags dry air down with it. When the rapidly descending air strikes the ground, it spreads outward in all directions, like a fast-running faucet stream hitting the bottom of the sink. There are two (2) sub-categories of downbursts: the larger macrobursts and small microbursts. Page|109 Macroburst - Macrobursts are downbursts with winds up to 117 miles per hour which spread across a path greater than 2.5 miles wide at the surface and which last from 5 to 30 minutes. Microburst- Microbursts are strong, damaging winds which strike the ground and often give the impression a tornado has struck. They frequently occur during intense thunderstorms. The origin of a microburst is downward moving air from a thunderstorm’s core. But unlike a tornado, they affect only a rather small area, less than 2.5 miles in diameter from the initial point of downdraft impact. An intense microburst can result in damaging winds near 170 miles per hour and often lasts for less than five minutes. There are two (2) types of microburst windstorms: dry and wet. ✓ Gust Front- A gust front is the leading edge of rain-cooled air that clashes with warmer thunderstorm inflow. Gust fronts are characterized by a wind shift, temperature drop, and gusty winds out ahead of a thunderstorm. Sometimes the winds push up air above them, forming a shelf cloud or detached roll cloud. ✓ Haboob- Haboobs, Arabic for blasting/drifting, is a type of intense dust storm carried on an atmospheric gravity current (i.e., thunderstorm), also known as a weather front. When a thunderstorm collapses, and begins to release precipitation, wind directions reverse, gusting outward from the storm and generally gusting the strongest in the direction of the storm's travel. Haboobs occur regularly in arid regions throughout the world. In Southern California, Santa Ana winds are considered a windstorm event. Santa Ana winds are katabatic winds- Greek for “flowing downhill”. These winds occur below the passes and canyons of the coastal ranges of Southern California and in the Los Angeles basin. Santa Ana winds often blow with exceptional speed in the Santa Ana Canyon (the canyon from which it derives its name). Santa Ana winds are strong, extremely dry (low humidity) down-slope winds that originate from cool, dry high pressure air masses in the Great Basin region (the high plateau east of the Sierra Mountains and west of the Rocky Mountains, including most of Nevada and Utah) and affect Southern California. These winds come up, over, and are pulled southward down the eastern side of the Sierra Nevada’s and into the Southern California region. The air warms as it descends toward the California coast at the rate of 5 degrees Fahrenheit per 1000 feet due to compressional heating. Thus, compressional heating provides the primary source of warming. The air is dry since it originated in the desert, and it dries out even more as it is heated. Page|110 Forecasters at the National Weather Service offices in Oxnard and San Diego usually place speed minimums on these winds and reserve the use of “Santa Ana” for winds greater than 25 knots. These winds accelerate to speeds of 35 knots as they move through canyons and passes, with gusts to 50 or even 60 knots. Santa Ana winds can happen anytime during the year but are most prevalent in the autumn and winter months. The most significant hazard associated with Santa Ana winds is an increased wildfire danger, but Santa Ana winds can also cause downed trees and power lines, and property damage, as well as causing potentially hazardous conditions for ’s, semi-trailers, aircraft, and boaters. • Location and Extent Although tornadoes and hurricanes are rare, the entire City of Temecula is susceptible to various types of windstorms • History As mentioned, tornadoes and hurricanes are rare in the area, but the City of Temecula has experienced significant straight-line winds events as well as one tornado. In February of 2005, an F1 tornado brought between 70 and 100 mile per hour winds to the area along with pouring rain and some hail according to residents and news coverage. The event lasted approximately five (5) minutes with the majority of the damage isolated to a single square mile area. Over the past five (5) years, the City has noticed an increase in local straight -line wind events. Many of the straight-line wind events do not rise to the level of significance or require the activation of the City’s EOC but they do leave behind a trail of damage. The straight-line wind events range in strength of wind and duration but they all have similar impacts, downed trees and powerlines, injuries, and minor structural damage. These straight-line wind events create issues for local resident and business, including prope rty damage and traffic congestion. • Probability The City of Temecula is at risk of windstorms at any given time during the calendar year. However, as previously mentioned, they are more prevalent in the autumn and winter months. Santa Ana winds, which commonly occur between October and February, and can reach speeds of mor e than 100 miles per hour. Tornadoes and/or Hurricanes occur infrequently in California, which has a statewide average of just 5 tornadoes/hurricanes a year. This is significantly less than states located in the S’ “tornado alley”, which can experience as many as 50–100 tornadoes per year or along the southern Atlantic US/Gulf of Mexico region which can experience twelve (12) named storms, six (6) hurricanes, and three (3) major hurricanes each year. In addition, most California tornadoes and hurricanes are considered “weak”; the historical average occurrence rate of Strong – Violent events in California is zero. Page|111 • Climate Change Considerations Climate change will play a significant role with windstorm events. The changing conditions are expected to cause a significant amplification to many existing conditions. Because of this, climate change might impact the frequency and intensity of windstorms. Climate change, although still being studied, could have an effect on high - and low-pressure zones. High- and low-pressure zones are created by many factors, but many are related to uneven heating of the earth’s surface by the sun. Many of the factors that go into the heating of the earth’s surface, but many may be impacted by Climate change (i.e., type of vegetation in areas impact ability to absorb heat, amount of snow cover which reflects heat). In addition to altering and possibly increasing frequency of significant winds in the area. This indicates that the City of Temecula could experience a greater number of windstorm events in the future. 5.4.2.2 Dam Failure • Ranking: Probability – Low; Impact - High • Description Dam failure is the collapse or failure that causes significant downstream flooding. Dam failure may be caused by a severe storm, earthquakes, erosion or piping or foundation, loss of structural integrity, or landslides flowing into the dam. The main consequences of dam failure are inju ry, loss of life, and significant downstream property damage. Evacuations and extensive rescue efforts would be necessary to save the lives of those in or around the downstream areas. A major dam failure would require mutual aid from other local, state, an d federal governments and agencies. • Location and Extent Dam inundation is a potential flood hazard in several portions of the Temecula Valley. There are four specific locations of concern in Temecula, and they are: • Vail Lake Dam – Failure at this dam could result in extensive and catastrophic flooding along the downstream watercourse. Dam failure is limited to times during and immediately following major storms, however, seismic activity on any of the local fault lines have the potential to cause the dam to fail. The Vail Lake Dam, built in 1949, is a water storage reservoir that is located east of Temecula on the Temecula Creek. The reservoir has a storage capacity of approximately 45,000 acre-feet (AF); however, due to the long-term drought effects, there is approximately 15,000 AF currently stored at the lake. The reservoir itself covers and estimated 1,078 acres and if in failure, the water contained within will cover a drainage area of approximately 306 square miles. Its crest elevation is 1,482.60 feet with a crest length of 788 feet and width of 4 feet. • In 2013, the dam was found to be seismically insufficient and vulnerable to failure. The Vail Dam Seismic and Hydrologic Remediation Project will construct a new straight-axis concrete dam located downstream of the existing arch dam. The current Page|112 spillway is insufficient to pass the probable maximum flood without overtopping the dam, and the existing concrete arch dam would not resist the stresses induced by the maximum credible earthquake. The project purpose is to replace aging infrastructure, provide flood control from a major earthquake, and provide a locally water supply. Figure 5.13 - Vail Dam Flood Inundation Map (2022) Page|113 • Skinner Lake Dam – The Skinner Reservoir, also known as Lake Skinner, is a reservoir that is situated approximately 10 miles northeast of Temecula. Originally constructed in 1973 and expanded in 1991, the lake has a current capacity of 43,800 acre-feet of water (14,274,420,000 gallons). The reservoir surface area is 860 acres with a drainage capability of 51 square miles. The crest elevation is 1,493 feet with a width of 30 feet. The dam’s height sits at 109 feet. • A large seismic event occurring on one of the two fault lines located in southwest Riverside County is capable of causing the dam infrastructure to fail thus creating catastrophic flooding downstream from the dam. While flooding from a failure of this dam in comparison to the Vail dam is minimal, there will still be a significant enough of an impact to place the community at risk down the Highway 79 corridor leading to the Temecula/Murrieta Creek as it descends into Old Town and out to the Pacific Ocean. Figure 5.14 - Skinner Dam Inundation Map (2016) Page|114 • Diamond Valley Lake - The Diamond Valley Lake is a man-made off-stream reservoir that is located near Hemet, California. Diamond Valley Lake (DVL) is one of the largest reservoirs in Southern California with a capacity of 800,000 -acre feet of water. With this capacity, the lake nearly doubled the area’s surface water storage capacity and provides additional water supplies for drought, peak summer, and emergency needs. DVL features three earth fill dams, two located on either side of the valley and one along the north rim. • While this lake and its dams are 24 miles away from Temecula, the hazard it poses to the Temecula Valley during a catastrophic seismic event is worth noting. The design and construction of the dams took into consideration the threat of earthquakes with the San Jacinto Fault Zone, located approximately 4 miles from the reservoir, and the San Andreas Fault located about 19 miles from the reservoir. • Diamond Valley Lake (Saddle Dam) - The saddle dam rises 130 feet above the lowest point in the Domenigoni Mountains ridgeline of the north rim and is around ½ mile long. The dam was built to increase the storage capacity of the lake, which would have been limited dur to the low ridge in this area. • Diamond Valley Lake (West Dam) - The west dam rises to 285 feet above the valley floor. It spans 1.5 miles in length and its foundation was extended 90 feet below the original ground surface to remove liquefaction soils that would have made the dam unstable in an earthquake. Page|115 As depicted in the map to the right, the Inundation from the Saddle and West side dams will result in heavy flooding across the region. Flooding from a catastrophic failure will impact the City of Temecula primarily along the 79N (Winchester Road) through French Valley and the Warm Springs Creek before ending at the Murrieta Creek and dumping into the Uptown District of Temecula, Old Town, and across the I-15 freeway impacting the Promenade Mall and businesses along Ynez Road. The sunny day failure scenario places Temecula at approximately 3 hours from failure to the receipt of water in our area. Figure 5.15 - Diamond Valley Lake Dam Inundation Map(s) (2022) Page|116 • History No significant historical incidents to report to date. • Probability There are no studies that predict the probability of dam structural failure. However, there has been a study done that correlates earthquake activity to potential. • Climate Change Considerations While there is no direct linkage between climate change and dam rupture, there could be indirect linkages. As climate change impacts are either felt or perceived to be felt it could directly impact the dam and its ability to hold back large quantities of water from winter storms and runoff. 5.4.2.3 Terrorism • Ranking: Probability – Low; Impact - High • Description Terrorism, as defined by the FBI is "the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social objectives". The act of terrorism could involve biological agents, nuclear technology, incendiary devices, chemicals, or explosives. The public does not perceive that terrorism is thriving in the United States because few incidents have been spectacular, a high violence rate makes terrorist actions routine, and terrorist actions are typically against property (bombings) rather than people. U.S. terrorist incidents have included the joint effort of the Black Liberation Army and the Weathe r Underground to rob an armored car in Nyack, N.Y., on October 20, 1981; the 1983 bombing in the Capitol building; and bombings of abortion centers. A likely target category of future terrorist attacks is the nuclear power plant, given the number of demonstrations against them. Transnational terrorists funded by foreign governments could easily enter the United States and mount attacks. There are 6,000 miles of border that can be easily crossed and many ethnic populations which enable foreign terrorists to move about without suspicion. In 2018, most ideologically motivated murders in the United States were linked to right -wing extremism. As of 2020, right-wing terrorism accounted for the majority of terrorist attacks and plots in the U.S. and has killed more people in the continental U.S. since the September 11 attacks than Islamic terrorism (Antidefamation League, 2022). The Department of Homeland Security reported in October of 2020 that white supremacists posed the top domestic terrorism threat (Washington Post, 2021). Page|117 • Location and Extent Terrorism can occur throughout the entire city but due to terrorisms’ intended purpose to cause the greatest amount of destruction it would most likely happen in more populous areas (high value, visually recognized targets) where more devastation, fear, and chaos will ensue. • History There are no significant historical events that have occurred to date. • Probability All City businesses and facilities are perceived as a soft target; however, due to the intended purpose of terrorism, it would most likely happen in more populous urban areas where more devastation (and fear) will ensue. • Climate Change Considerations While there is little evidence to link climate change increasing occurrences of terrorism. However, depending on the type of attack, it could intensify the incident (i.e., Improvised Explosive Device - IED during high wind event), and hinder the response and recovery efforts (i.e., evacuation during flooding). 5.4.2.4 Insect Infestation • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - Low • Description Agricultural pests and disease infestation occur when an undesirable organism inhabits an area in a manner that causes serious harm to agriculture crops, livestock or poultry, and wild land vegetation or animals. Countless insects and diseases live on, in, and around plants and animals in all environments. Most are harmless, while some can cause significant damage and loss. Under some conditions, insects and diseases that have been relatively harmless can become hazardous. For example, severe drought conditions can weaken trees and make them more susceptible to destruction from insect attacks than they would be under normal conditions. • Location and Extent The City of Temecula has several agriculture crops (grapes) that are on the edges of the eastern end of the city and limited commercial livestock, predominantly horses. However, the City of Temecula, much like most cities have areas and vegetation susceptible to infestations. Impacts to local plants happen throughout the entire city. Impacts on wildland vegetation or animals generally happen in interface areas along edges of the community. • History Page|118 As mentioned, the city is vulnerable to insect infestation. Infestations of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly, Oriental Fruit Fly, Gypsy Moth, Glassy-winged Sharpshooter, Asian Citrus Psyllid, and Light-Brown Apple Moth have all occurred in the last 30 years; however, there are no detailed records to list each event. Diseases such as Chrysanthemum White ust and Pierce’s Disease of Grapes have caused significant losses to local plants and impacts on wildland vegetation or animals. Emergencies related to insect infestation have impacted Riverside County and its local jurisdictions in the last decade, including an increased fire risk due to Bark Beetle infestation of trees in 2003, and mosquito-borne West Nile Virus in 2007. Since 2002, the Bark Beetle infestation has required removal of thousands of acres of affected trees in the Angeles National Forest, as well as on private lands. However, both the Bark Beetle and West Nile Virus infestations are under control and did not seriously impact the City of Temecula. Additionally, while future infestation issues are possible, the impact on the City of Temecula is generally expected to be limited and no major impact to the community. • Probability Due to its interaction with the global economy, its mild Mediterranean and temperate climate, its diversified agricultural and native landscape, the City of Temecula can experience impacts from agricultural pests and diseases annually. • Climate Change Considerations Continued climate change is likely to alter the abundance and types of pest s, lengthen pests’ breeding season, and increase pathogen growth rates. For example, the pink bollworm, a common pest of cotton crops, is currently a problem only in southern desert valleys because it cannot survive winter frosts elsewhere in the state. However, if winter temperatures rise 3 to 4.5°F, the pink bollworm’s range would likely expand northward, which could lead to substantial economic and ecological consequences for the state. Temperature is not the only climatic influence on pests. For example, some insects are unable to cope in extreme drought, while others cannot survive in extremely wet conditions. Furthermore, while warming speeds up the lifecycles of many insects, suggesting that pest problems could increase, some insects may grow more slowly as elevated carbon dioxide levels decrease the protein content of the leaves on which they feed (California Climate Change Center 2006). 5.4.2.5 Landslide • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - Low • Description Landslides can be defined as the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down an incline. According to the SGS, the term “landslide” encompasses five (5) modes of slope movement: falls, topples, slides, spreads, and flows. Page|119 ✓ Falls are masses of soil or rock that dislodge from steep slopes and free-fall, bounce, or roll downslope. ✓ Topples move by the forward pivoting of a mass around an axis below the displaced mass. ✓ Spreads (lateral) commonly induced by liquefaction of material in an earthquake, move by horizontal extension and shear or tensile fractures. ✓ Slides displace masses of material along one or more discrete planes. – In “rotational” sliding, the slide plane is curved, and the mass rotates backwards around an axis parallel to the slope. – In “translational” sliding, the failure surface is more or less planar and the mass moves parallel to the ground surface. ✓ Flows mobilize as a deforming, viscous mass without a discrete failure plane. Landslides can be caused by natural processes or by man-made activities. Landslides occurs when down-slope forces (gravity) exceed the resistance (strength) of the earth materials. Landslides can be initiated by rainfall, snowmelt, changes in water level, stream erosion, changes in ground water, earthquakes, volcanic activity, disturbance by human activities, or any combination of these factors. Two (2) of the more common types of landslides include: ✓ Mudflows- defined as flows or rivers of liquid mud down a hillside on the surface of normally dry land. They occur when water saturates the ground, usually following long and heavy rain falls, or rapid snow melt. Mud forms and flows down slope if there is no ground cover such as brush or trees to hold the soil in place. ✓ Debris Flow- defined when water begins to wash material from a slope or when water sheets off of a newly burned stretch of land. Chaparral land is especially susceptible to debris flows after a fire. The flow will pick up speed and debris as it descends the slope. As the system gradually picks up speed it takes on the characteristics of a basic river system, carrying everything in its path along with it. Fast-moving (or rapidly moving) landslides present the greatest risk to human life, and people living in or traveling through areas prone to rapidly moving landslides are at increased risk of serious injury. Debris- flows can travel down a hillside with speeds up to 200 miles per hour (though more commonly, 30-50 miles per hour), depending on the slope angle and type of earth and debris in the flow. Slow-moving landslides can occur on relatively gentle slopes and can cause significant property damage but are less likely to result in serious human in juries. Slow-moving slides include rotational slides, where sliding material moves along a curved surface, and translational slides, where movement occurs along a flat surface. These slides are generally slow-moving and can be deep. Slumps are small rotational slides that are generally shallow. The size of a landslide usually depends on the geology and the initial cause of the landslide. Landslides vary greatly in their volume of rock and soil; the length, width, and depth of the area Page|120 affected; frequency of occurrence; and speed of movement. Some characteristics that determine the type of landslide are slope of the hillside, moisture content, and the nature of the underlying materials. Landslides are given different names, depending on the type of failure and their composition and characteristics. Many landslides are difficult to mitigate, particularly in areas of large historic movement with weak underlying geologic materials. As communities continue to modify the terrain and influence natural processes, it is important to be aware of the physical properties of the underlying soils as they, along with climate, create landslide hazards. Proper planning cannot completely eliminate the threat of landslides to the safety of people, property, and infrastructur e; however, without proper planning, landslide hazards will be even more common and more destructive. • Location and Extent The California Geological Survey is in the process of recording and mapping historical and potential landslides in the state. The location and extent of landslides are extremely difficult to predict and are usually based on historical event and/or soil type and topography. Landslides have the potential to occur in areas with one or more of the following conditions: ✓ On or close to steep hills ✓ Steep road-cuts or excavations ✓ Existing landslides or places of known historic landslides (such sites often have tilted power lines, trees tilted in various directions, cracks in the ground, and irregular- surfaced ground) ✓ Steep areas where surface runoff is channeled, such as below culverts, V -shaped valleys, canyon bottoms, and steep stream channels ✓ Fan-shaped areas of sediment and boulder accumulation at the outlets of canyons ✓ Canyon areas below hillside and mountains that have recently (within 1-6 years) been subjected to a wildland fire. • History There have been no known previous occurrences of landslides documented in the City of Temecula. • Probability Landslides are a common hazard in California. Weathering and the decomposition of geologic materials produce conditions conducive to landslides, and human activity further exacerbates many landslide problems. It is difficult to estimate the probability of occurrence for landslide as no landslide susceptibility maps have been prepared for Temecula. However, recently there has been increased probability for mud flows and debris flows due to wildfire events in the area. Page|121 • Climate Change Considerations Climate change can increase the probability, frequency, and/or intensity of landslides. Changes in precipitation, specifically the increased frequency of intense precipitation, can result in significant water run-off, which may cause landslides. Additionally, increase in wildfire hazards will result in loss of hillside vegetation. The loss of hillside vegetation will increase the likelihood of debris and mudflows. This could result in landslides occurring in areas not previously identified. 5.4.2.6 Nuclear Event • Ranking: Probability – Medium; Impact - Low • Description Radioactive materials are routinely transported in California, whether the materials are for medical or industrial use. Nuclear incidents can occur wherever radioactive materials are used, stored, or transported. In addition to nuclear plants, hospitals, universities, research laboratories, industry, highway transportation, railroads, and shipping yards could be the site of a nuclear transportation incident. Nuclear incidents might involve a nuclear power generating plant, a nuclear weapon, nuclear waste, or a ‘dirty bomb’. Nuclear Power Plants – In California, there are two nuclear power plants: Diablo Canyon, which is located in San Luis Obispo County and San Onofre, which is located in the northwestern corner of San Diego County along Interstate 5. For purposes of this plan, San Onofre will be discussed. The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) is a three-unit site, 10 miles south of San Clemente. Unit 1, which operated for 25 years, was shut down in 1992. Units 2 and 3 were pressured water reactor designs that were capable of producing enough power to serve the needs of the 2.75 million households. Unit 2 was started in 1983 and Unit 3 was started in 1984. Upgrades had been made that would increase their life of use to 20 years and was completed in 2010. However, both reactors were shut down in January of 2012 after premature wear was identified on more than 3 thousand tubes in replacement steam generators that were installed in 2010-2011 (Wikipedia, 2022). In 2013, Southern California Edison (SCE) announced the permanent retirement of San Onofre Units 2 and 3. Today, SONGS is in the process of decommissioning which will take up to 20 years to complete. All spent radioactive fuel would be held on -site indefinitely in dry casks while low- level radiation would be transported and disposed of in Texas and Utah. The threat of sabotage or terrorism is real and multiple scenarios have been discussed. However, while the potential and reality exist, the probability of an attack at this location are low (The Orange County Register, 2010). In an article written in May of 2020, also in the Orange County register, Southern California Page|122 Edison (SCE) held a community engagement panel to consider a handful of doomsday scenarios that included terrorism, cracks, and sabotage. Only scenarios were discussed and there were no specific threats against the location identified. Upon completion, the panel did mention a continuation of the discussion but there has been no additional information confirming any other meetings. Because of the potential health hazard associated with this type of fuel, power plants are built with multiple physical barriers to prevent the escape of radioactive material. Still, the possibility exists for an accidental release of radiation into the atmosphere. People could breathe contaminated air and radioactive particles could be deposited on the ground, in water, on property and on agricultural crops. Food and dairy animals could graze on contaminated pasture, passing on the contamination to consumers through milk and meat. • Location and Extent The City of Temecula is located within the 50-mile Ingestion Pathway Zone (Figure 5.16) for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating System (SONGS). Following an incident at San Onofre Nuclear Generating System (SONGS), the public will be notified of precautions to take with food and water. Home grown or commercial fruits and vegetables should be washed, scrubbed, and peeled to avoid contamination. For drinking water, bottled water or juices should be consumed. Avoid drinking water from the surface of lakes, streams, and water wells. As of September 2022, there are no known commercial dairy farms located in Temecula. There are other livestock ranches within our sphere of influence located within the Temecula Valley Wine Country. In order to avoid contamination, livestock owners will be notified to take precautions. Lactating cows should be removed from pastures and fed substituted, uncontaminated feed. Figure 5.16 – San Onofre Nuclear Zone Map (2011) Page|123 • History There is no record of any nuclear incident that has impacted the City of Temecula. The proximity of SONGS to the city presents an increased potential for exposure due to prevailing winds. • Probability The release of nuclear materials can occur anywhere, however, in Temecula it is unlikely as this facility resides in another county yet its impacts to the community from a release are certain. Communities can be at risk if nuclear material is not handled safely or released in harmful amounts into the environment. Exposure to nuclear material can cause death, serious injury, and long-lasting health effects. • Climate Change Considerations There is no evidence to link climate change occurrences with the rel ease of hazardous nuclear material. Changing conditions can create more mishaps and accidents with the erosion of the beaches that the plant sits on and from degradation of materials. 5.4.2.7 Civil Disorder • Ranking: Probability – Low; Impact - Low • Description Civil Disturbance is a term generally used to describe disorderly conduct or a breakdown of orderly society by a large group of people. Civil Disturbance can range from a form of protest against major socio-political problems to riots. • Location and Extent Civil Disturbance can occur in any part of the City of Temecula. However, it is generally located within larger, more concentrated, commercial areas along Ynez Road as well as City Hall. • History In 2020, there were threats against the City of Temecula to inflict damage to city infrastructure in response to events surrounding the death of George Floyd. However, there are no significant historical incidents that have occurred. However, there have been a few small incidents that have occurred due to recent social and political movements. • Probability There are no studies that predict the probability of civil disturbance occurrences. Page|124 • Climate Change Considerations While there is no direct linkage between climate change and civil disturbances, there could be indirect linkages. As climate change impacts are either felt or perceived to be felt it could ignite passions within people to demonstrate against possible causes or enablers. Page|125 6.1 Overview As defined by FEMA, risk is a combination of hazard, vulnerability, and exposure. “It is the impact that a hazard would have on people, services, facilities, and structures in a community and refers to the likelihood of a hazard event resulting in an adverse condition that causes injury or damage.” The risk assessment process identifies and profiles relevant hazards and assesses the exposure of lives, property, and infrastructure to these hazards. The process allows for a better understanding of a urisdiction’s potential risk to hazards and provides a framework for developing and prioritizing mitigation actions to reduce risk from future hazard events. 6.2 City Disaster Proclamation History One method to identify hazards based upon past occurrences is to look at what events triggered federal and/or state disaster declarations within the City (though disaster declarations are declared on a county basis). Disaster declarations are granted when the severity and magnitude of the event’s impact surpass the ability of the local government to respond and recover. Disaster assistance is supplemental and sequential. When the local government’s capacity has been surpassed, a state disaster declaration may be issued, following the local agency’s declaration, allowing for the provision of state assistance. Should the disaster be so severe that both the local and state government’s capacity is exceeded, a federal disaster declaration may be issued allowing for the provision of federal disaster assistance. The federal government may issue a disaster declaration through FEMA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and/or the Small Business Administration (SBA). FEMA also issues emergency declarations, which are more limited in scope and without the long-term federal recovery programs of major disaster declarations. The quantity and types of damage are the determining factors. This section focuses on state and federal disasters and emergency declarations. Table 6.1 - Emergency or Disaster Declarations, City of Temecula (2022) Year Resolution Number Emergency/Disaster Type 2021 2021-16 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2021 2021-06 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-83 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-65 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-55 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-35 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-20 COVID-19 (Reissuance) 2020 2020-17 COVID-19 Pandemic 6. RISK ASSESSMENT Page|126 Year Resolution Number Emergency/Disaster Type 2007 07-105 Flooding 2007 07-91 High Winds 1993 93-34 Flooding (Reissuance) 1993 93-25 Flooding (Reissuance) 1993 93-19 Flooding (Reissuance) 1993 93-08 Flooding (Reissuance) 1993 93-03 Extreme Flooding 6.3 Disaster Proclamation Process When there is a condition of extreme peril or potential peril to the safety of persons and property, and the condition is beyond the capability of the local jurisdiction to control effectively, the local governing body (i.e., city council, board of supervisors or a person authorized by ordinance) may proclaim that a local emergency exists. The local government may request the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) Director to concur in their proclamation of a local emergency and to provide assistance under the California Disaster Assistance Act (CDAA). The City of Temecula has proclaimed four (4) local emergencies since its incorporation in 1989. Most recently, on March 17, 2020, the City Manager in his capacity as Director of Emergency Services signed Proclamation No. 20-17 to address the COVID-19 pandemic. The City Council ratified the City Manager’s Proclamation by adopting esolution No. 20 -17 on March 24, 2020. A copy of the resolution must be provided to the Riverside County Operational Area as soon as possible for transmission of the resolution to Cal OES. When a county proclaims a local emergency pursuant to Section 8630 of the Government Code, based upon conditions which include both incorporated and unincorporated territory of the county, it is not necessary for the cities to also proclaim the existence of a local emergency independently. If sufficient conditions occur, the State may proclaim a state of emergency to fully commit state and mutual aid assistance and provide resources to assist local government. Following the proclamation of a state of emergency, the California OES Director may recommend that the Governor request a Presidential declaration of a major disaster under the authority of Public Law 93-288. The Governor’s request to the president is submitted through the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Since 1965, Riverside County has had over 45 Federal Disaster Declarations. The most recent Federally Declared Disaster was in September of 2022 as a result of the Fairview Fire which directly impacted the City of Temecula due to the establishment of two mass care and shelter sites to service the 22,000 homes that were evacuated into the City. Page|127 6.4 Vulnerability Assessment With Temecula’s hazards identified and profiled, the HMPC conducted a vulnerability assessment to describe the impact that each priority hazard would have on the City. The vulnerability assessment quantifies, to the extent feasible using best available data, assets at risk to natural hazards and estimates potential losses. This vulnerability assessment followed the methodology described in the FEMA publication Understanding Your Risks—Identifying Hazards and Estimating Losses. The vulnerability assessment first describes the total vulnerability of the City and values at risk and then discusses vulnerability by hazard. 6.5 Hazard Risk Rating A risk assessment involves evaluating vulnerable assets, describing potential impacts, and estimating losses for each hazard. The intention of a risk assessment is to help the community understand the greatest risks facing the City of Temecula. The risk assessment defines and quantifies vulnerable populations, building, critical facilities, and other assets at risk from hazard s and is based on the best available data and the significance of the hazard. The risk assessment further examines the impact of the identified hazards on the City, determines which areas of the City are most vulnerable to each hazard and estimates potential losses to City facilities for each hazard. For the 2022 LHMP the risk for each hazard was rated using the Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI). The CPRI examines four (4) criteria for each hazard (probability, magnitude/severity, warning time, and duration) as show below in Table 6.2. For each hazard, an index value is assigned for each CP I category from 0 to 4 with “0” being the least hazardous and “4” being the most hazardous situation. This value is then assigned a weighting factor and the result is a hazard ranking score as shows in Table 6.3. Table 6.4 is an overall summary of the hazard evaluations for the City. Table 6.2 – Calculated Priority Risk Index (CPRI) CPRI Category Degree of Risk Chart Assigned Weight Level ID Description Index Value Probability Unlikely Extremely rare with no documented history of occurrences or events. Annual probability of less than 0.001. 1 45% Possible Rare occurrences with at least one documented or anecdotal historic event. Annual probability of between 0.01 and 0.001. 2 Page|128 CPRI Category Degree of Risk Chart Assigned Weight Level ID Description Index Value Likely Occasional occurrence with at least two (2) or more documented historic events. Annual probability of between 0.1 and 0.01. 3 Highly Likely Frequent events with a well-documented history of occurrence. Annual probability of greater than 0.1. 4 Magnitude / Severity Negligible Negligible property damages (less than five percent (5%) of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses are treatable with first aid and there are no deaths. Negligible quality of life lost. Shut down of critical facilities for less than twenty-four (24) hours. 1 30% Limited Slight property damages (greater than five percent (5%) and less than twenty-five (25%) of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries and illnesses do not result in permanent disability and there are no deaths. Moderate quality of life lost. Shut down of critical facilities for more than one (1) day and less than one (1) week. 2 Critical Moderate property damages (greater than 25% and less than fifty (50%) of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructures). Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and at least one death. Shut down of critical facilities for more than one (1) week and less than one (1) month. 3 Catastrophic Severe property damages (greater than fifty (50%) of critical and non-critical facilities and infrastructure). Injuries or illnesses result in permanent disability and multiple deaths. Shut down of critical facilities for more than one (1) month. 4 Warning Time < than 6 hours Population receives less than six (6) hours of warning. 4 15% 6 to 12 hours Population receives between six (6) to twelve (12) hours of warning. 3 12 to 24 hours Population receives between twelve (12) to twenty-four (24) hours of warning. 2 > than 24 hours Population receives greater than twenty (24) hours of warning. 1 Page|129 CPRI Category Degree of Risk Chart Assigned Weight Level ID Description Index Value Duration < than 6 hours Disaster event will last less than six (6) hours. 1 10% 6 to 24 hours Disaster event will last between six (6) to twenty-four (24) hours. 2 24 hours to 1 week Disaster event will last between twenty-four (24) hours and one (1) week. 3 > than 1 week Disaster event will last more than one (1) week. 4 Table 6.3 - CPRI Hazard Scores and Risk Rating Risk Level Severe High Moderate Low Rank Score 4 3-3.99 2-2.99 1-1.99 Table 6.4 - CPRI Hazard Rating Summary (2022) Hazard Probability (45%) Magnitude / Severity (30%) Warning Time (15%) Duration (10%) Weighted Score Risk Level Earthquake 4 4 4 3 3.75 High Wildfire 4 3 4 3 3.5 High Transportation 4 3 4 2 3.25 High Flood 3 3 3 2 2.75 Moderate Drought 4 3 1 4 3 High Comm Failure 4 3 4 2 3.25 High Extreme Heat 3 4 1 3 2.75 Moderate Electrical Failure 3 4 4 2 3.5 High Pandemic 3 4 1 4 3 High HAZMAT 3 4 4 1 3 High The requirements for hazard profiles are stipulated in DMA 2000 and its implementing regulations. The hazards that the HMPT selected for this update of the LHMP have been profiled using federal, state, regional, and local resources that have been mapped, d ocumented, or reported on hazards. Both natural and man-made hazards are included. The hazards that exist in the City of Temecula are profiled in Section 5 Hazard Assessment. Each hazard includes a description of the type, location and extent, and previous history. Maps and graphs are used throughout this plan to display hazard identific ation data. Page|130 6.6 f T u ’ Vu This section of the LHMP meets requirements for hazard profiles and a risk assessment as provided in the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 44, 201.6(c)(2)(i). 6.6.1 Identification of Critical Facilities and Assets The location and operations of high-risk facilities such as critical infrastructure and key assets in or near Temecula are a significant concern with respect to a disaster. The HMPT used FEMA’s “Public Assistance Guide” (FEMA 322) that defines critical facilities such as shelters, hospitals, EOCs, data centers, utility plants or highly hazardous materials facilities. They also used the FEMA Hazard Mitigation Handbook which describes three categories of facilities for analysis to revise and update the list. Section 3.8 of this plan discusses Temecula’s key assets and critical facilities. These locations are identified in Appendix 5. The City’s Fire Marshall maintains and extensive list of childcare facilities, churches, elder care facilities and facilities containing hazardous materials. 6.6.2 Cultural and Natural Resources Inventory Historical Resources are those improvements, buildings, structures, signs, features, Historic Districts, landmarks, trees, or other objects of cultural, architectural, or historical significance to the City that are at least fifty (50) years old, and which have been determined to be eligible for historic designation and deemed appropriate by the Temecula History Museum. The Temecula Museum maintains a current list. There are many current local designated Historic Points of Interest in Old Town Temecula. These and other designated points of interest as well as future locally designated historic places shall be protected and not permitted to be modified, demolished (unless declared a public hazard by the Development Department i.e., Code Enforcement, Building or Fire), altered, renovated, remodeled, improved, or expanded unless approved by review. The review of the modification shall utilize the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. 6.6.3 Risk Assessment and Potential Loss A risk assessment determines the vulnerability of assets within the City by evaluating the inventory of City-owned existing property and the population exposed to a hazard. A quantitative vulnerability assessment is limited to the exposure of people, build ings, and infrastructure to the identified hazards. This risk assessment includes only those hazards that have the ability to cause damage to buildings and infrastructure. More detailed assessments of risk that would include deaths and injuries, and economic losses, are beyond the scope of this plan. Page|131 Table 6.5 - A f ’ Critical Infrastructure (2022) Critical Facilities Impacting Hazards Value Earthquake 25% Wildfire 15% Transportation 10% Flood 50% Drought 5% Communication Failure 20% Extreme Heat 5% Electrical Failure (PSPS) * Pandemic * HAZMAT 5% Facility Contents (estimates) Total Value Fire Station 12 X X X X X X X X X $2,260,700.00 $904,280 $3,164,980.00 Fire Station 73 X X X X X X X X $3,161,275.00 $1,264,510 $4,425,785.00 Fire Station 84 X X X X X X X X $2,934,750.00 $1,173,900 $4,108,650.00 Fire Station 92 X X X X X X X X $1,950,000.00 $780,000 $2,730,000.00 Fire Station 95 X X X X X X X X $2,260,700.00 $90,680 $2,351,380.00 Old Town Store Front (RSO) X X X X X X X (Part of Civic Center) HELP Center X X X X X X X X $585,000.00 $234,000 $819,000.00 S.A.F.E X X X X X X X $1,202,500.00 $481,000 $1,683,500.00 Civic Center X X X X X X X X $32,500,000.00 $13,000,000 $45,500,000.00 Temecula Wedding Chapel X X X X X X X $515,775.00 $206,310 $722,085.00 Temecula Valley Museum X X X X X X X $2,340,000.00 $936,000 $3,276,000.00 Old Town Theatre X X X X X X $7,257,250.00 $2,902,900 $10,160,150.00 Mary Phillips Senior Center X X X X X X X X X $3,021,200.00 $1,208,480 $4,229,680.00 Field Operations Center X X X X X X X $5,767,775.00 $2,307,110 $8,074,885.00 Field Operations Center (West Wing) X X X X X X $2,880,150.00 $1,152,060 $4,032,210.00 TVE2 X X X X X X $9,810,775.00 $3,924,310 $13,735,085.00 Temecula Public Library X X X X X X X $11,050,975.00 $4,420,390 $15,471,365.00 Jefferson Recreation Center X X X X X X X X $6,500,000.00 $2,600,000 $9,100,000.00 Temecula Community Center X X X X X X X $1,923,350.00 $769,340 $2,692,690.00 Page|132 Critical Facilities Impacting Hazards Value Earthquake 25% Wildfire 15% Transportation 10% Flood 50% Drought 5% Communication Failure 20% Extreme Heat 5% Electrical Failure (PSPS) * Pandemic * HAZMAT 5% Facility Contents (estimates) Total Value Community Recreation Center X X X X X X X $8,606,000.00 $3,442,400 $12,048,400.00 Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve Solar Farm X X X X X X X * Pandemic and Electrical Failure (PSPS) hazards do not have associated values for potential losses as they generally do not result in physical damage to infrastructure and facilities. Both can result in substantial costs for emergency protective measures and other response activities. 6.6.4 Vulnerable Populations Factors such as age, physical and/or mental condition, socioeconomic status, access to key services, and many other factors affect the ability of people to prepare for and protect themselves and their property from a hazard event. Even though some hazard events may impact all or parts of Temecula, different populations may experience the impacts differently. Higher- income households, for instance, are likely more able to afford the cost of retrofitti ng their homes to resist flooding or move to a location that is less prone to flooding than a lower-income household. As a result, the higher-income household is less likely to experience significant damage during a flood event than the lower-income household, even if the same amount of rain falls on both. There are situational and physical characteristics that help identify vulnerable populations , or populations at risk, that may not comfortable or safely access and use disaster / emergency resources. Specifically, when discussing emergency preparedness, the following groups could be considered vulnerable or at a greater risk during an emergency: • Infants and small children under age three (3) • Women who are pregnant • Elderly people (age 65 and older) • Homeless • Obese and bedridden • Mentally ill Page|133 • Those with cognitive disabilities • Those with medical conditions (e.g., heart disease, diabetes high blood pressure) • Those requiring life-saving medications (e.g., high blood pressure, depression, dementia) • Individuals with drug or alcohol addiction • Mobility constraints • Those who are non-ambulatory • The poor • Non-English speakers who may not have access to information A social threat analysis examines the ways hazard events are likely to impact different demographic populations in Temecula and where these different demographic populations live within the City. This includes assessing whether the people in an area of an elevated hazard risk are more likely than the average person to be considered a threatened population. The s ocial threat analysis uses the following criteria to assess the threat to vulnerable populations: • Disability status: Persons with disabilities may often have reduced mobility and experience difficulties living independently. As a result, they may have little or no ability to prepare for and mitigate hazard conditions without assistance from others. • Income levels: Lower-income households are less likely to have the financial resources to implement mitigation activities on their residences. They may also struggle with having the necessary time to find and access educational resources discussing hazard mitigation strategies. Furthermore, lower-income households are less likely to be able to afford to move to areas that are safer or less at risk of being impacted by a hazard. The national poverty limit standard for the U.S. for a four-person family is approximately an income of $27,750 or less. For Riverside County, the FY 2022 Extremely Low-Income Limits for a four- person family, according to the Riverside County Housing Authority is $27,750 (30% of median). The FY 2022 Very Low-Income Limits for a four-person family is $44.000 (50% of median). • Seniors (individuals at least 65 years of age): Seniors are more likely to have reduced mobility, physical and/or mental disabilities, and lower-income levels, all of which may decrease their ability to prepare for and mitigate a hazard event. The social threat analysis also shows the threat other populations may encounter, such as persons experiencing homelessness or persons without access to lifelines (vehicles or communication networks). Since data for these groups are not readily available, there is no definitive way to determine the amount of these persons in areas of elevated risk, so this assessment will discuss how these other threatened groups may also be affected on a general level. Page|134 Table 6.6 shows the amounts of people in Temecula who meet at least one of the criteria for threatened and/or vulnerable populations. For more detailed demographic information, please refer to Chapter 3. Table 6.6 – City of Temecula Threatened-Population Metrics (2023) Threatened Population Metric Community-Wide Data Population 110,846 Households 34,266 Median Household Income $103,546 Renter Households 32.4% Percentage of households with at least one person living with a disability 7.1% Percentage of households living under the poverty limit 7.7% Percentage of households with one-member aged 65+ 10.8% Percentage of households with a language other than English is spoken at home (ages 5 years +) 25.1% ***Population estimates rely on US Census ACS data. Any differences from other population estimates in this document may be related to how the data is analyzed. 6.6.5 Analysis of Potential Losses FEMA requires that an estimation of loss be conducted for the identified hazards to include the number of potential structures impacted by the hazards and the total potential costs. The analysis of potential losses calculated in Table 6.7 used the best data currently available to produce the estimations of loss. These estimates may be used to understand relative risk from hazards and potential losses. There are uncertainties in any loss estimation method, resulting from lack of scientific study and the exact result of hazard effects on the bui lt environment, and from the use of approximations that are necessary for a comprehensive analysis. In addition, this assessment does not include analysis of non-City owned facilities, even though they are deemed critical. The City does not have replacement or content values or insured values for critical infrastructure, private businesses, schools, and churches. A mitigation action was developed to acquire that information so a complete analysis of critical facilities can be completed to show total potential loss in the City. A quantitative assessment has been prepared for the critical facilities affected by each hazard assessed and multiplied by a value of percent damage. The percent damage was determined by the geographic area at stake, previous history of damage from the type of hazard, and potential for severity from the hazard profiles. Page|135 Table 6.7 - Analysis of Potential Losses (2022) Hazard Type # of Critical Facilities Percent Damage Replacement Value Content Value Estimated Replacement Loss Estimated Contents Loss Total Estimated Loss Earthquake 11 25 $85,354,750.00 $34,141,900.00 $21,336,686.25 $8,535,474.5 $30,691,160.75 Wildfire 7 15 $47,421,725.00 $18,968,690.00 $7,113,258.00 $2,845,003.00 $9,958,261.00 Transportation 5 10 $36,009,675.00 $14,403,870.00 $8,791,964.00 $1,440,387.00 $10,232,351.00 Flood 12 50 $61,933,950.00 $23,959,980.00 $30,971,973.00 $11,979,990.00 $42,951,963.00 Drought 15 5 $96,221,450.00 $37,674,980.00 $4,811,068.00 $1,883,747.00 $6,694,815.00 Comm Failure 15 20 $96,221,450.00 $37,674,980.00 $19,246,290.00 $7,534,996.00 $26,781,286.00 Extreme Heat 5 2 $30,341,025.00 $11,322,810.00 $606,810.00 $226,454.00 $833,264.00 Electrical Failure 15 * $96,221,450.00 $37,674,980.00 Pandemic 15 * $96,221,450.00 $37,674,980.00 HAZMAT 5 5 $30,341,025.00 $11,322,810.00 $1,517,050.00 $566,140.00 $2,083,190.00 * Because Pandemic and Power Failure/PSPS are not likely to result in physical damage to facilities, no values are assigned. However, both hazards can result in substantial costs for emergency protective measure, emergency response, lost revenue and human loss of life and injury. Page|136 This page is intentionally left blank Page|137 7.1 Overview The mitigation strategy for the City of Temecula is based on informed assumptions, recognizing both mitigation challenges and opportunities, with the ultimate mission of creating a disaster resistant and sustainable community for the future. The mitigation strategy is derived from an in-depth understanding of possible deficiencies between potential vulnerabilities and existing capabilities, with the mitigation objectives in mind. The mitigation strategy builds upon the previous mitigation actions identified by the City of Temecula 2017 LHMP and was expanded to consider current needs. 7.2 Mitigation Goals and Objectives To better assist with the identification of mitigation measures, mitigation goals and objectives were developed. The mitigation goals and ob ectives support the City’s mitigation mission to create a disaster ready, disaster resilient and sustainable community while remaining aligned with the Operational Area. As a result, some of the goals and objectives were removed and/or reworded. Well defined goals and objectives were used by the Planning Team as a starting point prior to identifying mitigation measures. The goals and objectives include: • Goal 1: Minimize Loss of Life and Injuries o Objective 1.1: Provide timely notification and direction to the public in preparation for imminent and potential hazards. o Objective 1.2: Protect public health and safety through mitigation, preparing for, responding to, and recovering from the effect of natural, technological, or man - made disasters. o Objective 1.3: Reduce hazard impacts and protect life, property, and the environment from damages. o Objective 1.4: Improve understanding of the type, location, and effects of hazards and vulnerabilities, as well as measures needed to protect life. o Objective 1.5: Improve community transportation corridors to allow for better evacuation routes for public and better access for emergency responders. o Objective 1.6: Develop policies and procedures to better serve disadvantaged and vulnerable populations. 7. MITIGATION STRATEGY Page|138 • Goal 2: Improve Community and Agency Awareness o Objective 2.1: Increase public awareness about the natura and extent of hazards they are exposed to, where they occur, what is vulnerable, and recommended response to identified hazards. o Objective 2.2: Improve mitigation and hazard related outreach to businesses, city departments, and stakeholders to increase their understanding of the threats within the city. o Objective 2.3: Establish and maintain partnerships between all levels of local government, the private sector, the business community, community groups, and institutions of higher learning that exchange information on hazards and the benefits of mitigation measures. • G : h u ’ Capability to Mitigate Hazards and Reduce Exposure to Hazard Related Losses o Objective 3.1: Reduce hazard related property losses by enforcing strong building codes. o Objective 3.2: Reduce repetitive losses for fire, flood, and earthquakes by encouraging community protective measures and by anticipating future events. o Objective 3.3: Reduce hazard impacts to critical facilities, utilities, and services through the implementation of low-cost mitigation strategies. o Objective 3.4: Continue to strengthen land use regulations in high hazard areas. • Goal 4: Reduce Hazard Related Property Losses o Objective 4.1: Reduce hazard impacts to critical facilities, utilities, and services through the implementation of low-cost mitigation strategies. o Objective 4.2: Continue to strengthen land use regulations in high hazard areas. • Goal 5: Maintain Coordination for Disaster Planning and Integrated Public Policy o Objective 5.1: Incorporate changes with CalOES and FEMA that may affect public policy and planning. o Objective 5.2: Incorporate mitigation related activities into other disaster planning mechanisms, such as the General Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. • Goal 6: Improve Emergency Management Capability o Objective 6.1: Identify the need for, and acquire, any special emergency management equipment to enhance response capabilities for specific hazards. o Objective 6.2: Develop and maintain emergency plans (Response, Recovery, Preparedness, Prevention, Mitigation). o Objective 6.3: Establish and maintain emergency management systems and facilities. o Objective 6.4: Develop and maintain Public-Private Partnerships. o Objective 6.5: Develop and maintain Memorandums of Understanding/Mutual Aid Agreements. Page|139 o Objective 6.6: Develop, maintain, and share essential data (demographics, hazards, buildings, resources, personnel). o Objective 6.7: Develop, maintain, and implement emergency management training curriculum. o Objective 6.8: Design and implement disaster response exercises (tabletop, functional, full-scale). 7.3 Progress Implementing Mitigation Measures As part of the LHMP update process, the Planning Team reviewed the mitigation actions included in the previous plan. The review included identifying the status of the prior mitigation actions (completed, not started, in progress, or no longer needed) from the previous plan. Those mitigation actions that were determined to be “on -going” were placed under the Mitigation Governance section of Capabilities Assessment chapter. In other words, the Planning Team deemed that since the measure did not have a stop or start date, it should not be placed under these sections and should be captured in the Mitigation Governance with the other ongoing mitigation programs. If deemed “as needed”, the mitigation measure was carried over to the new list of mitigation measures. Additionally, descriptions of the carried over, needed mitigation actions were reviewed, and in some cases, the name was changed, the scope was expanded, and/or the mitigation measure was merged with another (public outreach for all -hazards, not just flooding or fires). Table 7.1 indicates the status of each of the mitigation measures from the previous plan (2017). These actions will be carried over to the 2022 plan for potential funding over the next five (5) years or for continuation of their ongoing project(s). Table 7.1 - Status of Previous 2017 Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure Hazard Status Murrieta Creek Project Flood Ongoing Program Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Temecula Creek/Pala Community Park) Flood In Progress Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Empire Creek/Margarita Community Park) Flood Not Started (Carry over to 2022 List) Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Long Canyon Creek/Long Canyon Creek Park) Flood Not Started (Carry over to 2022 List) Wildfire – Weed abatement, Public Education, Fire Department Apparatus, Fire Inspections Wildfire Ongoing Program Earthquake – Public Education, Emergency Alert Systems Earthquake Ongoing Program 7.4 Mitigation Measure Prioritization The HMPT used the STAPLEE Criteria (Social, Technical, Administrative, Political, Legal, Economic, and Environmental) to evaluate the feasibility of each of the mitigation measures being considered for inclusion in the LHMP update. The STAPLEE process helped the HMPT understand Page|140 possible challenges that could hinder the ability to implement the mitigation measure. The STAPLEE Criteria includes the following considerations: • Social o Is the proposed action socially acceptable to the community? o Are there equity issues involved that would mean that one segment of the community is treated unfairly? o Will the action cause social disruption? • Technical o Will the proposed action work? o Will it create more problems that it will solve? o Does it involve a problem or only a symptom? o Is it the most useful action in light of other community goals? • Administrative o Can the community implement the action? o Is there someone to coordinate and lead the effort? o Is there sufficient funding, staff, and technical support available? o Are there ongoing administrative requirements that need to be met? • Political o Is the action politically acceptable? o Is there public support both to implement and to maintain the project? • Legal o Is the community authorized to implement the proposed action? Is there a clear legal basis or precedent for this activity? o Are there legal side effects? Could the activity be construed as a taking? o Is the proposed action allowed by the general plan, or must the general plan be amended to allow the proposed action? o Will the community be liable for action or lack of action? o Will the activity be challenged? • Economic o What are the costs and benefits of this action? o Do the benefits exceed the costs? o Are initial, maintenance, and administrative costs considered? o Has funding been secured for the proposed action? If not, what are the potential sources (public, non-profit, and private)? o How will this action affect the fiscal capability of the community? o What burden will this action place on the tax base or local economy? o What are the budget and revenue effects of this activity? o Does the action contribute to other community goals, such as capital improvements or economic development? o What benefits will the action provide? Page|141 • Environmental o How will the action affect the environment? o Will the action need environmental regulatory approvals? o Will it meet local and state regulatory requirements? o Are endangered or threatened species likely to be affected? Each proposed mitigation measure was assessed and given a score between 1-5 where 5 is favorable/beneficial (or no major issues/opposition) and 1 is unfavorable/not beneficial (or major issues/opposition) for each of the STAPLEE criteria. The scores were then totaled, and a final score was established for each mitigation measure. A relative comparison of mitigation measures helps understand which mitigation measure may have the greatest potential for implementation. However, the HMPT recognized that this ranking does not (and should not) preclude the City from funding mitigation actions lower on the list first, especially if funding is available. 7.5 Mitigation Measures & Projects The focus of the mitigation measures was on the “high” priority (Tier I) hazards (Transportation Failure, Energy Shortage/Power Outage, Flood, Wildfire, and Earthquake); however, some mitigation measures do address other hazards or cut across all hazards. Mitigation measures were identified by assessing the effectiveness of current capabilities (existing plans, policies, and programs) against the expected impacts (vulnerabilities). Table 7.2 represents the proposed mitigation measures identified by the Planning Team. Table 7.2 - Mitigation Actions (Hazard / Goal Alignment) (2022) Mitigation Action Hazard Goal 1 Create and maintain a Key Asset Database Multi 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 2 Develop and maintain Emergency Circulation (Traffic) Plan(s); acquire necessary equipment to support implementation (Mass Evacuation Plan) Transportation Failure 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 3 Develop and maintain Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) and Public-Private Partnerships in support of emergency management and business continuity Multi 3, 5, 6 4 Develop and maintain an Emergency Public Communications Plan; acquire necessary equipment and maintain systems to support implementation Multi 3, 5, 6 5 Develop and/or incorporate Emergency Management Training and Exercise Program into existing training and exercise programs Multi 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 6 Participate and continue support of the OA Stakeholder Group Multi 5, 6 7 Maintain the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Multi 5, 6 8 Increase coordination with Lifeline Stakeholders to better understand their improvement, mitigation, and resiliency efforts Multi 2, 3, 5, 6 9 Coordinate with Southern California Edison Emergency Management Multi 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 10 Coordinate with School District Emergency Management Multi 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 11 Formalize and expand the role of the Floodplain Manager/NFIP Coordinator Flood 3, 4, 5 12 Continue support of the County Floodplain Management Plan Flood 1, 3, 4, 5 Page|142 Mitigation Action Hazard Goal 13 Develop, maintain, and disseminate an Infectious Disease Response Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Pandemic 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 14 Ensure Fire Resistant Materials are incorporated into existing building modifications and/or future development Wildfire 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 15 Incorporate Defensive Space Standards in existing and future building designs Wildfire 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 16 Coordinate with the County, surrounding local cities, and the regional Fusion Center Civil 2, 5, 6 17 Coordinate with State and local Governments; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Drought 2, 5, 6 18 Develop and maintain a Water Conservation Plan; implement recommendations Drought 2, 3, 4, 5 19 Develop and maintain a Drought Emergency Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Drought 2, 3, 4, 5 20 Coordinate with State of California local Governments; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Extreme Temperature 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 21 Develop and maintain an Extreme Temperature Emergency Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support implementation Extreme Temperature 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 22 Continue to develop and maintain Mass Care and Shelter Program/Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support implementation Multi 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 23 Acquire and develop a process for obtaining food and water for disaster victims during emergencies Multi 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 24 Formalize, maintain, and promote the implementation of NIMS Credentialing and Qualifications; acquire necessary equipment, material, and supplies needed to support implementation Multi 5, 6 25 Resource Management System - Formalize, maintain, and promote the Resource Ordering Program; acquire necessary equipment, material, and supplies needed to support implementation Multi 5, 6 26 Coordinate with the County, surrounding local cities, and the regional Fusion Center; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Terrorism 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 27 Coordinate with NTSB, Regional Association of governments, and County Transportation Department; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Aviation 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 28 Develop and maintain Business Continuity Plan(s), emphasize loss of technology (Tech Down) situation Technology 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 The HMPT made assessments to determine if plans, policies, and/or programs needed to be expanded and/or improved; and whether those changes would support reducing the hazard. Any recommended changes to plans, policies, and programs are reflective in Table 7.2. It is also worth to note, that consideration was also given to needed plans, policies, and programs. They too are also included in Table 7.2. In addition to the proposed mitigation actions above, the HMPT decided to focus on three (3) mitigation projects that will support lessening the impact and reduction of hazards from floods Page|143 and wildfires. These Mitigation projects were identified by assessing the top hazards affecting the City of Temecula and validating their existence against curr ent capabilities (existing plans, policies, and programs) against the expected impacts (vulnerabilities ). Table 7.3 represents the proposed mitigation projects identified by the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. Table 7.3 - Mitigation Projects (2022) Project Hazard Funding Project Status Notes Temecula / Murrieta Creek Widening (continuation) Flood U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Ongoing Program New Project City-Wide Mass Evacuation Plan Flood / Wildfire / Transportation Failure General Fund / HMA Not Started New Project Loudspeaker Notification System along Dam Inundation and Flood Routes Flood / Mass Evacuation HMA Not Started New Project Wildland Vegetation Management – Temecula Creek Wildfire HMA In Progress New Project Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Temecula Creek/Pala Community Park) Flood City General Fund In Progress Carry Over from 2017 Annex Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Empire Creek/Margarita Community Park) Flood City General Fund Not Started Carry Over from 2017 Annex Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Long Canyon Creek/Long Canyon Creek Park) Flood City General Fund Not Started Carry Over from 2017 Annex Wildfire – Weed abatement, Public Education, Fire Department Apparatus, Fire Inspections Wildfire City General Fund / Emergency Management / Fire Department Ongoing Program Carry Over from 2017 Annex Earthquake – Public Education, Emergency Alert Systems Earthquake Emergency Management / HMA Ongoing Program Carry Over from 2017 Annex 7.6 Mitigation Measure Implementation Plan Table 7.4 reflects the implementation plan for each mitigation measure. The implementation plan identifies the lead department responsible for the action, the estimated cost, potential funding source to support the action, and the proposed timeframe for completion. It is important to note that while a lead department is identified that some other City departments (i.e., Information Technology, Police, Fire, or Facilities) may actually take the lead depending on the project (i.e., Memorandums of Understanding- MOUs and Business Continuity Plan- BCPs). Emergency Management may coordinate the effort, but the other City departments may actually Page|144 take the lead to complete the particular MOU or BCP. Additionally, the City intends to actively search for other possible funding source to help implement the mitigation measures, but those resources are not known at this time to be listed. It is also worth to note that Temecula has listed Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grants under several of the mitigation measures. The City recognizes that HMA grants include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC), and Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) funding. It was deemed better by the Planning Team t o list it collectively, instead of only selecting 1 or 2 of the grant programs as to not limit consideration under the other grant programs. Table 7.4 - Mitigation Actions – Implementation Plan (2022) Mitigation Action Lead Cost Timeframe Funding 1 Create and maintain a Key Asset Database Emergency Management <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 3 Develop and maintain Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs) and Public-Private Partnerships in support of emergency management and business continuity Emergency Management <$100,000 1-3 years General Fund 4 Develop and maintain an Emergency Public Communications Plan; acquire necessary equipment and maintain systems to support implementation Emergency Management <$100,000 1-3 years General Fund 5 Develop and/or incorporate Emergency Management Training and Exercise Program into existing training and exercise programs Emergency Management / Management Team <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 6 Participate and continue support of the OA Stakeholder Group Emergency Management <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 7 Maintain the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Emergency Management <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 8 Increase coordination with Lifeline Stakeholders to better understand their improvement, mitigation, and resiliency efforts Emergency Management <$100,000 1-3 years General Fund 9 Coordinate with Southern California Edison Emergency Management Emergency Management & Public Works <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 10 Coordinate with School District Emergency Management Emergency Management <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund 11 Formalize and expand the role of the Floodplain Manager/NFIP Coordinator Public Works <$100,000 < 2 years General Fund 12 Continue support of the County Floodplain Management Plan Public Works <$100,000 < 1 year General Fund/ HMA 13 Develop, maintain, and disseminate an Infectious Disease Response Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Emergency Management & Emergency Management Committee <$100,000 1-3 years General Fund/ HMA Page|145 Mitigation Action Lead Cost Timeframe Funding 14 Ensure Fire Resistant Materials are incorporated into existing building modifications and/or future development Fire $100,000- $300,000 1-3 years General Fund/ HMA 15 Incorporate Defensive Space Standards in existing and future building designs Fire/Community Development $100,000- $300,000 1-3 years General Fund/ HMA 16 Coordinate with the County, surrounding local cities, and the regional Fusion Center Police $300,000- $500,000 1-3 Years General Fund / EMPG 26 Coordinate with the County, surrounding local cities, and the regional Fusion Center; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Police <$100,000 < 1 Year General Fund / HMA 18 Develop and maintain a Water Conservation Plan; implement recommendations Emergency Management / Public Works / Community Development $100,000- $300,000 3-5 years General Fund / HMA 17 Coordinate with State and local Governments; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Emergency Management $100,000- $300,000 <1 year General Fund 19 Develop and maintain a Drought Emergency Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Emergency Management / Public Works / Community Development $100,000- $300,000 3-5 years General Fund 20 Coordinate with State of California local Governments; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Emergency Management $100,000- $300,000 3-5 years General Fund / HMA 21 Develop and maintain an Extreme Temperature Emergency Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support implementation Emergency Management $100,000- $300,000 2-4 years General Fund / HMA 22 Continue to develop and maintain Mass Care and Shelter Program/Plan; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support implementation Emergency Management / Community Services <$100,000 1-2 years General Fund 23 Acquire and develop a process for obtaining food and water for disaster victims during emergencies Emergency Management / Community Services <$100,000 1-2 years General Fund 24 Formalize, maintain, and promote the implementation of NIMS Credentialing and Qualifications; acquire necessary equipment, material, and supplies needed to support implementation Emergency Management <$100,000 2-4 years General Fund 25 Resource Management System - Formalize, maintain, and promote the Resource Ordering Program; acquire necessary equipment, material, and supplies needed to support implementation Emergency Management / Facilities / Public Works <$100,000 < 1 Year General Fund Page|146 Mitigation Action Lead Cost Timeframe Funding 27 Coordinate with NTSB, Regional Association of governments, and County Transportation Department; acquire equipment, supplies, and other material as needed to support role Emergency Management / Public Works <$100,000 <1 year General Fund 28 Develop and maintain Business Continuity Plan(s), emphasize loss of technology (Tech Down) situation Emergency Management $100,000- $300,000 1-3 years General Fund/HMA Page|147 8.1 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan The City of Temecula Office of Emergency Management (OEM) will lead the effort and will be responsible for ensuring that this plan is being monitored and evaluated over the next five (5) years. While there is not a confirmed meeting schedule, OEM will ensu re that at a minimum, there is an annual meeting of the Hazard Mitigation Planning Team (HMPT) and possibly other interested stakeholders to discuss the LHMP and any possible changes to hazards or vulnerabilities. The first annual meeting will occur at the beginning of the year following the date of FEMA approval. The annual review with the HMPT will include but not be limited to: • Status on progress towards implementing mitigation measures • The need for additional and/or removal of mitigation measures • Adjustments to the mitigation measure and/or implementation plan • Addition to the goals and/or objectives • Revisions to the hazard profiles, primarily focused on description, history, and location In addition to the annual meetings, OEM may also leverage existing meetings to review, evaluate, and discuss progress on the mitigation actions set forth in this plan. OEM will ensure that the LHMP is an agenda item or incorporated into the discussion notes in those meetings where appropriate. The HMPT will also visit the LHMP after significant hazard events; ensuring Lessons Learned and other vital information is captured for incorporation into future LHMP revisions. This will provide the HMPT with an opportunity to evaluate the value of any implemente d mitigation actions, validate the needs of the remaining mitigation actions, and possibly identify additional mitigation actions. Information obtained from all of these meetings will be captured by OEM and made available for the next LHMP update. 8.1.1 Coordinating Body OEM will also lead the effort to update the LHMP. The City of Temecula specific Hazard Mitigation Planning Team will continue to be responsible for Plan maintenance. The Temecula Team is made up of representatives from the following departments: • City Manager’s Office Economic Development • City Clerk’s Office • Finance Department • Community Services • Community Development / Building & Safety 8. PLAN ADMINISTRATION Page|148 • Office of Emergency Management • Public Works • Information Technology • Riverside County Sheriff's Department • Temecula Fire Department (CALFire / Riverside County Fire Department) Understanding the need not to have the LHMP expire, OEM will begin the process of updating the LHMP two (2) years prior to the plan expiration date. OEM may or may not seek a Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grant or the assistance of a consultant to support this effort. If this is true, OEM will incorporate appropriate time to account for this need. 8.2 Incorporating into other Planning Efforts The City of Temecula is aware of the hazards that face its community, as historic incidents prove that disasters continue to evolve as a common occurrence in this area. The City will continue to strive toward protecting the life, property, and economy of the City of Temecula. Temecula also supports an all-hazard approach, encouraging information sharing between City Departments to incorporate into other planning efforts. As other plans are developed, the LHMP information will be leveraged and incorporated when other plans could benefit from a better understanding of hazards and the potential mitigation measures that can be taken. Over the past five (5) years, personnel challenges have limited the City’s ability to fully incorporate the LHMP into other plans. While previous planning team members have championed and shared LHMP information during other planning efforts, there has not been a formalized process to truly integrate the LHMP information into other plans. The City, through the hiring of its first professional emergency manager, is committed to keep pushing for better integration of LHMP information. After a comprehensive review of the prior LHMP Annex, there was no identifiable integration of the identified pro ects or mitigation actions into any of the City’s key plans or plannin g efforts. As a result, the City of Temecula’s Office of Emergency Management will be incorporating and/or leveraging the information from the LHMP into the: • Emergency Operations Plan • General Plan • Climate Action Plan • Storm Water Collection Plan • Continuity of Government/Operations Plan • Wildland Vegetation Management Plan • Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area Plan(s) The City of Temecula will be incorporating the LHMP into the City’s update to the General Plan Safety Element. As opportunities present themselves, the City will make every effort to incorporate the new LHMP information into other plans where appropriate. In the meantime, the LHMP will be utilized to assess future developments in accordance with the General Plan. In Page|149 addition to reviewing future development against relevant land use and zoning regulations, building codes and fire codes, and environmental and engineering standards, it will also be reviewed against the LHMP. Proposed development projects will be assessed to determine exposure (or risk) to community hazards. The LHMP will also serve as a reference for suggested mitigation measure to reduce and/or eliminate risk from those hazards. 8.3 Continued Stakeholder and Public Involvement As mentioned under Section 2.4 and 2.5, the City of Temecula will organize and/or participate in a variety of meetings/events to share and exchange information about mitigation with stakeholders and the public. The City will use its social media platforms and when appropriate, leverage stakeholder and community social media platforms to announce the meetings/events. This City will also continue to provide public forums which gives the public and local emergency managers the opportunity to collaborate and coordinate prior to an emergency occurri ng. 8.4 Point of Contact Comments or suggestions regarding this plan may be submitted to: City of Temecula; Office of Emergency Management Mikel Alford, Emergency Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, Ca 92590 (951) 693-3971 / mikel.alford@temeculaca.gov Page|150 This page is intentionally left blank Page|151 Appendix 1 – Adoption Resolution Page|152 This page is intentionally left blank Page|153 Agency Department Staff Position City of Temecula City Manager’s Office Betsy Lowrey Assistant to the City Manager City of Temecula City Clerk’s Office Lanny Krage Records Manager City of Temecula Human Resources Mikel Alford Emergency Manager City of Temecula Human Resources Courtney Fletcher Management Assistant City of Temecula Finance Tina Rivera Purchasing Administrator City of Temecula Information Technology Oscar Lopez Network Administrator City of Temecula Information Technology (GIS) Aaron Matthews GIS Specialist City of Temecula Community Services Jeff Lawrence Community Services Manager City of Temecula Fire Department Wendy Miller Management Analyst City of Temecula Community Development Matt Peters Principal Planner City of Temecula Riverside County Sheriff Deputy J. Kenitzer Deputy – City Hall City of Temecula Building & Safety Brian Clements Building Official City of Temecula Community Development Brandon Rabidou Principal Management Analyst City of Temecula Public Works Ron Moreno Principal Civil Engineer City of Temecula Public Works Stuart Kuhn Associate Civil Engineer City of Temecula Economic Development Christine Damko Economic Development Manager American Red Cross Riverside County Gerald Winkel Disaster Program Manager American Red Cross Riverside County Alex Newman Disaster Program Manager CALFire Temecula Fire Department Chief John Crater Division Chief CALFire Temecula Fire Department Capt. Matthew Hayes Paramedic / Admin Capt. CalOES RIVCO EMD Jose Ortega Emergency Services Coordinator California Highway Patrol Temecula Division Mike Lassig PIO California Highway Patrol Temecula Division Capt. Jason Penner Commander City of Murrieta Fire Department Rachel Hollinger Disaster Preparedness Coordinator City of Menifee Human Resources Vanessa Barrera Emergency Management Analyst City of Lake Elsinore RIVCO EMD Ralph Mesa Emergency Services Coordinator Chamber of Commerce President/CEO Brooke Nunn President / CEO Temecula Valley Hospital Administration Darlene Wetton CEO Temecula Valley Hospital Plant Operations Ben Cossette Environment of Care / EM Temecula Valley Unified School District Superintendent Office Jason Vickery Director of Safety and Security National Weather Service Alex Tardy Senior Meteorologist Riverside County EMD Operations Camille Collins Emergency Services Coordinator Riverside County EMD Operations Eric Cadden EM Program Supervisor Visit Temecula Valley CEO Scott Wilson President SoCal Gas Adam Eventov Public Affairs Manager SoCal Edison Jeremy Goldman Rancho Water Tom Marcoux MSJC Regulatory Compliance Nicole Pina Director Abbott Vascular Amanda Molina Promenade Mall Operations Jeff Kurtz General Manager Pechanga Emergency Management Fire Department Edward Chacon Tribal Emergency Manager Riverside County District 3 County Supervisor Office Chuck Washington D3email@rivco.org CALTRANS District 8 CALTRANS Carolina Rojas PIO MCB Camp Pendleton Mission Assurance Jerry Vanlancker Emergency Manager Habitat for Humanity Administration Tammy Marine Executive Director First Light Home Care Administration Evangi Bello Office Manager Appendix 2 – Planning Team Members Page|154 This page is intentionally left blank Page|155 Appendix 3 – Planning Team Member Meeting Attendance Matrix Page|156 Page|157 Appendix 4 – Public Outreach Page|158 Page|159 Page|160 Page|161 Page|162 Page|163 Page|164 Page|165 Page|166 Page|167 Page|168 Page|169 Page|170 Page|171 Page|172 Page|173 Table App 5.1 - Essential (Critical) Facilities - City of Temecula Facility Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Building Replacement Cost Fire Department (FD) Fire Station 12 28330 Mercedes St 1947 6,000 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $ 1,065,000 Fire Station 73 27415 Enterprise Circle West 2016 6,956 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $2,260,700.00 Fire Station 84 30650 Pauba Rd 1996 9,727 sq ft Concrete Masonry bearing walls w wood roof deck supported by wood joists $3,161,275.00 Fire Station 92 32211 Wolf Creek Dr 2007 9,030 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $2,934,750.00 Fire Station 95 32131 South Loop Ranch 2005 6,000 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $1,950,000.00 Fire Station 73 27415 Enterprise Circle West 2016 6,956 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $2,260,700.00 Emergency Management Emergency Operations Center (Primary) 41000 Main St 2010 100,000 sq ft Pre-engineered Steel Structure over concrete pad column footings over a concrete slab foundation $32,500,000.00 Emergency Operations Center (Alternate) 30600 Pauba Rd 2006 34,003 sq ft Concrete tilt-up bearing walls, steel framing, wood roof deck supported by wood joists $11,050,975.00 TCC Trailer / CERT Compound 32364 Overland Trail 2005 1,000 sq ft Manufactured Trailer u h ff’ ( ) Old Town Temecula Store Front 28690 Mercedes St. St B 2009 3,330 sq ft Steel Frame w Concrete Topped Metal Decks $1,082,250.00 Promenade Mall Store Front 40820 Winchester Rd #2020 1999 3,000 sq ft Steel Frame w Concrete Topped Metal Decks California Highway Patrol 27685 Commerce Center Drive 6,950 sq ft Appendix 5 – Key Assets and Facilities Page|174 Facility Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Building Replacement Cost City of Temecula Facilities Food Pantry / Help Center and Barn 28922 Pujol St 1967 1,800 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over basement foundation $585,000.00 S.A.F.E. 28910 Pujol St 2009 3,700 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $1,202,500.00 Civic Center 41000 Main St 2010 100,000 sq ft Pre-engineered Steel Structure over concrete pad column footings over a concrete slab foundation $32,500,000.00 Temecula Wedding Chapel 41970 Moreno Rd 1997 1,587 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $515,775.00 Temecula Valley Museum 28314 Mercedes 1999 7,200 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation $2,340,000.00 Temecula Children's Museum 42081 Main Street 1990 7,600 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Structure over crawl space foundation $2,470,000.00 Mercantile Building 42051 Main Street 1890 22,330 sq ft Steel Frame w Metal Decks over concrete raft foundation slab for the new building. Masonry Bearing walls w roof deck supported by wood joists w wall footing foundation system for the old building. $7,257,250.00 Mary Phillips Senior Center 41845 Sixth St 1993 9,296 sq ft Masonry bearing walls and wood framed structure on concrete slab $3,021,200.00 Field Operations Center I 43230 Business Park Dr 2007 17,747 sq ft Steel Frame w Concrete Topped Metal Decks over concrete pad column footings $5,767,775.00 Field Operations Center II (West Wing) 43210 Business Park Dr 2001 8,862 sq ft Steel Frame w Concrete Topped Metal Decks over concrete pad column footings $2,880,150.00 Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2) 43200 Business Park Dr 1990 30,187 sq ft Concrete tilt-up bearing walls, steel framing, metal roof deck, steel joists $9,810,775.00 Page|175 Facility Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Building Replacement Cost Temecula Public / Ronald Roberts library 30600 Pauba Rd 2006 34,003 sq ft Concrete tilt-up bearing walls, steel framing, wood roof deck supported by wood joists $11,050,975.00 Grace Mellman 41000 County Center D 1972 15,000 sq ft Jefferson Recreation Center 41375 McCabe Court 1993 20,000 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Str over Concrete Slab Foundation $6,500,000.00 Harveston Community Room 28582 Harveston Dr 2004 1750 sq ft Mason Bearing Walls w Wood Frame Roof $568,750.00 Temecula community Center (TCC) 28816 Pujol St 1984 5918 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Str over Concrete Slab Foundation $1,923,350.00 Community Recreational Center (CRC) / Pool 30875 Rancho Vista Rd 1993 26480 sq ft Mason Bearing Walls w wood roof deck supported by wood joists $8,606,000.00 Margarita Recreation Center 29119 Margarita Rd 2016 8,069 sq ft Under Construction Mary Phillips Senior Center 41845 6th Street 1993 9,248 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Str over Concrete Slab Foundation $3,021,200 Old Town Temecula Community Theater 42051 Main St 2005 22,330 sq ft Mason Bearing Walls w wood roof deck supported by wood joists $7,257,250 Page|176 Table App 5.2 - Additional (Critical) Facilities - City of Temecula Facility Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost Fire Stations Pechanga Station 1 48240 Pechanga Rd 1998 Universities Mt. San Jacinto College (MSJC) Temecula Valley Campus 41888 Motor Car Pkwy 2008 358,500 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $ 152,824,913.00 California State University San Marcos (CSUSM) 43890 Margarita Rd University of Redlands One Better World Circle Suite 200 2005 4,773 sq ft San Joaquin Valley College (SJVC) 27270 Madison Ave #103 2003 1,649 sq ft The University of America 41707 Winchester Rd #301 1988 St. John's University 40945 County Center Drive Suite H 1988 1,433 sq ft Residential Care Facilities Temecula Healthcare Center 44280 Campanula Wy 2020 65,877 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $29,868,335.00 Temecula Memory Care 44320 Campanula Way 2020 25,441 sq ft Commercial /Industrial $29,868,335.00 Chardonnay Hills Care Home 31416 Chemin Chevalier 2002 3,352 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $660,000.00 Highgate Senior Living at Temecula 42301 Moraga Rd 2017 98,906 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $17,669,401.00 Atria Park of Vintage Hills 41780 Butterfield Stage Rd 2000 67,469 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $10,831,720.00 Family First Residential Care 42299 Faber Ct 2005 3,254 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $573,907.00 Senior Wyze Senior Care & Assisted Living 41593 Winchester Rd 1989 43,797 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $9,600,000.00 Rising Star Care Home 40600 Chantemar Wy 2001 1,999 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $348,845.00 Pebble Brook Senior Assisted Living 33722 Pebble Brook Cir 2006 3,528 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $720,590.00 The Hills of Alcoba 34038 Turtle Creek 2006 3,243 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $510,129.00 Gentle Care 39799 Longleaf St 2002 3,538 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $482,971.00 Page|177 Facility Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost Assisted Living Enterprises 30951 Sawgrass Ct 1986 2,288 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $525,384.00 Helping Hands Care Homes 33999 Tuscan Creek Way 2006 3,243 sq ft Modern Single- Family Residence (Post 1990) $590,513.00 Khayal Ami Care, Inc 27475 Ynez Rd 2016 5,107 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,827,374.00 Hospitals Temecula Valley Hospital 31700 Temecula Pkwy 2013 202,640 sq ft Commercial / industrial $133,521,929.00 Mass Care and Shelter Sites Community Recreation Center 30875 Rancho Vista Road 1993 26,480 sq ft Mason Bearing Walls w wood roof deck supported by wood joists $8,606,000.00 Temecula Valley High School 31555 Rancho Vista Road 1985 371,823 sq ft $119,693,420 Great Oak High School 32555 Deer Hollow Way 2004 290,388 sq ft $96,179,570 Chaparral High School 27215 Nicolas Road 1996 377,513 sq ft $84,778,820 Pechanga Resort and Casino 45000 Pechanga Parkway 1998 Conventional Wood Frame Structure over concrete slab foundation Page|178 Table App 5.3 – New Additional Critical Assets - City of Temecula Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost (estimate) Utilities SMER Solar Farm Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve 2017 16 acres 10,000 plus photovoltaic (PV) modules Rancho Ca Water District Solar Farm 42135 Winchester Road 2016 17 acres Solar Photovoltaic Parks Ranch at Sommers Bend Sports Park 32125 Verbena Way 2020 800 sq ft Conventional Wood Frame Str over Concrete Slab Foundation $260,000.00 Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park and Snack Shack 32380 Deer Hollow Way 2006 800 sq ft Mason Bearing Walls w wood roof deck supported by wood joists on a concrete raft slab foundation $260,000.00 Wastewater Complex Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility 42565 Avenida Alvarado 1975 95 sq ft Water Complex San Diego Aqueduct 1945 Pre-case concrete pipe, 48-96 inches in diameter Page|179 Table App 5.4 – Houses of Worship - City of Temecula Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost (estimate) Houses of Worship Crossroads Church 26090 Ynez Rd Ste A 1998 102,200 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $6,494,590.00 Crosspoint Church 28753 Via Montezuma 1987 19,480 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,809,708.00 Reliance Church 29825 Santiago Rd 1890 1,430 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,318,722.00 Sunridge Community Church 42299 Winchester Rd 1890 1,430 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,359,030.00 Calvary Chapel of Temecula 27462 Enterprise Circle West 1989 8,848 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,543,178.00 Rancho Church 31300 Rancho Community Wy 2017 73,783 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $19,532,446.00 Temecula Christian Fellowship 27715 Jefferson Ave Suite 114 1982 3,890 sq ft Beyond the Walls Community Church 42110 Remington Ave 2006 5,572 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $811,512.00 Temecula Hills Christian Fellowship 28780 Single Oak Dr Ste 120 1985 2,618 sq ft Commercial / Industrial Cornerstone Christian Baptist 40880 County Center Dr Ste N 1991 41,210 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,723,769.00 Rancho Baptist Church 29775 Santiago Rd 1992 4,200 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,394,308.00 Springs Community Church 41735 Winchester Rd 1992 Atmosphere Church 27500 Jefferson Ave. 2019 91,991 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $3,926,468.00 Calvary Baptist Church 31087 Nicolas Rd 1776 21,453 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $3,721,207.00 Hope Lutheran Church 29043 Vallejo Ave 2016 15,000 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $4,977,040.00 Fusion Christian Church 26770 Ynez Ct 1999 16,978 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,798,594.00 New Life Church 27620 Commerce Center Dr #105 1985 25,920 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,751,389.00 Grace A.M.E. Church 41625 Enterprise Cir S B-2 1987 5,850 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,383,182.00 Temecula United Methodist 42690 Margarita Rd 1995 5,063 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,558,073.00 Covenant Fountain Church 27645 Jefferson Ave Ste 111 1989 27,745 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $5,694,574.00 St Catherine of Alexandria 41875 C St 1991 11,295 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,996,171.00 True Vine Pentecostal Church 28780 Old Town Front St Ste D5 1776 Commercial / Industrial $4,369,816.00 Providence Presbyterian 31950 Pauba Rd 1990 14,278 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $9,510,737.00 Faith Bible Church Murrieta 27470 Jefferson Ave 1991 16,000 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,981,706.00 Page|180 Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost (estimate) Grace Presbyterian Church 31143 Nicolas Rd 2006 14,275 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $3,721,207.00 Trellis Community Church 27576 Commerce Center Dr Ste 108 Commercial / Industrial $5,916,000.00 The Place City of Miracles Cathedral 41823 Enterprise Cir N #100 2004 18,894 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,928,058.00 Light of Faith Christian Center 27727 Jefferson Ave 1987 17,285 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,529,079.00 Temecula Valley Church / St Thomas of Canterbury Episcopal 44651 Avenida De Missiones 2009 16,371 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $4,723,446.00 The Church in Temecula 45764 Corte Mislanca 2013 3,779 sq ft single family residence (post 1990) $472,082.00 The Potters House Christian Church 41669 Winchester Rd Ste 106 1991 18,555 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $3,213,000.00 The Church of Jesus Christ LDS 44650 La Paz St 2004 14,760 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $3,291,881.00 Nu-Way Christian Ministries 27576 Commerce Center Dr Commercial / Industrial Transformation Church 41636 Enterprise Cir N D-E 1999 3,564 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $529,200.00 Trinity Temecula 30470 Pauba Rd 1997 5,590 sq ft and 3,369 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $2,575,540.00 Grace Fellowship 41710 Enterprise Cir S #C 1989 14,848 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $867,339.00 The Call of Temecula Valley 43234 Business Park Dr #107 Commercial / Industrial $6,775,043.00 Oasis Christian Fellowship 27475 Ynez Rd $7,493,986.00 Iglesia Bautista Del Valle De Temecula 28639 Pujol St 1983 2,520 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,257,179.00 Bethlehem Temple Community Church 28780 Old Town Front St 1776 Commercial / Industrial $4,369,816.00 Ridgeline Community Church 41951 Moraga Rd School St Rafael Orthodox Christian Church 28924 Old Town Front St #102 $1,734,000.00 Jesus Love Korean Church 27570 Commerce Center #125 1988 23,794 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $4,008,249.00 Christian Science Society 28780 Old Town Front Street A6 1776 Commercial / Industrial $4,369,816.00 St Thomas the Hermit Coptic Orthodox 42101 Moraga Rd 1989 7,336 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $1,040,476.00 The Church of Jesus Christ LDS 32374 Pauba Rd 2006 24,119 sq ft Commercial / Industrial $6,565,232.00 Mosiac Assembly of God 31217 Pauba Rd $3,300,000.00 The Holy Spirit Empowered Presbyterian 39830 Longleaf St 2002 3,966 sq ft Single family residence (post 1990) $365,783.00 Page|181 Name Address Year Built Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Structure Type Replacement Cost (estimate) Harvest House Temecula 28975 Old Town Front St Ste 101 $3,393,062.00 Temecula Valley Korean Presbyterian 28030 Del Rio Rd 1973 10,000 sq ft Commercial / industrial $1,416,340.00 Iglesia Cristiana Jesu Cristo es la Respuesta 27713 Jefferson Ave #105 1984 9,560 sq ft Commercial / industrial $1,366,800.00 Virgin Mary Arabic Church, Melkite Catholic 42030 Avenida Alvarado Ste A $1,760,007.00 Family Life Church of the Valley 41743 Enterprise Cir N #108 $3,307,500.00 The Church in Temecula 41783 Niblick Rd 2000 2,552 sq ft Modern single- family residence (post 1990) $439,570.00 The Church of Jesus Christ LDS 29657 N General Kearny Rd 2003 6,558 sq ft Commercial / industrial $5,451,043.00 Essential Church 41710 Enterprise Cir S 1989 14,848 sq ft Commercial / industrial $867,339.00 Southern Cal District Church of Nazarene 28465 Old Town Front Street #313 1984 5,385 sq ft Commercial / industrial $1,081,107.00 Center for Spiritual Living 27895 Diaz Rd Suite A 1981 6,000 sq ft Commercial / industrial $415,210.00 World Mission Society Church 42041 Avenida Alvarado #A 1987 17,552 sq ft Commercial / industrial $612,379.00 Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship 34180 Rancho California Rd 1987 3,600 sq ft 11,056 sq ft 2,304 sq ft 1,200 sq ft Commercial / industrial $2,824,018.00 The Church of Jesus Christ LDS 43940 Pacific Sunset Dr 2009 16,300 sq ft Commercial / industrial $5,945,813.00 Iglesia Rancho en Espanol 31300 Rancho Community Way 2017 73,783 sq ft Commercial / industrial $18,953,105.00 Iglesia Ni Cristo 29385 Rancho California Rd 1997 14,481 sq ft Commercial / industrial $2,871,252.00 Unity Church Temecula Valley 41919 Moreno Rd 1977 2,560 sq ft Commercial / industrial $1,136,553.00 Circle of Care Ministry 26090 Ynez Rd 1998 102,200 sq ft Commercial / industrial $6,494,590.00 Church Growth Network 29850 Gateview Ct 1989 3,433 sq ft Modern single- family residence (1950-1990) $311,322.00 Renewal Life Christian Fellowship 27576 Commerce Center Dr Ste 111 $5,916,000.00 Islamic Center of Temecula 31061 Nicholas Rd 2018 4,205 sq ft Commercial / industrial $1,610,709.00 Temple Beth Sholom 28600 Mercedes St Ste 102 $1,586,589.00 Chabad of Temecula 42021 Avenida Vista Ladera 1988 3,673 sq ft Modern single- family residence (1950-1990) $440,400.00 Church of Scientology Mission 40945 County Center Dr C $2,880,696.00 Page|182 Table App 5.5 - Temecula Valley Unified School District Inventory Data by School Site Name Address Year Built* # of Buildings Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Building Replacement Value ($1,000) Permanent Portable TVUSD District Facilities 31350 Rancho Vista Road 1989 4 24 70,588 sq ft $12,766,890 TVUSD District & Transportation Facility 40516 Roripaugh Road 1995 8 1 41,621 sq ft $4,945,360 Abby Reinke Elementary School 43799 Sunny Meadows Drive 1999 8 2 88,119 sq ft $24,234,690 Alamos Elementary School 38200 Pacific Park Drive 2004 9 1 87,604 sq ft $25,639,780 Bella Vista Middle School 31650 Browning Street 2004 12 0 130,865 sq ft $41,418,360 Chapparal High School 27215 Nicolas Road 1996 29 31 377,513 sq ft $84,778,820 Crowne Hill Elementary School 33535 Old Kent Road 2005 8 1 87,925 sq ft $25,823,350 Earle Stanley Gardner Middle School 45125 Via Del Colorado 2003 8 0 110,781 sq ft $35,810,270 French Valley Elementary School 26680 Cady Road 2003 8 1 79,719 sq ft $25,452,510 Great Oak High School 32555 Deer Hollow Way 2004 39 0 290,388 sq ft $96,179,570 Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School 32400 Camino San Dimas 1999 2 15 59,048 sq ft $20,839,580 James L. Day Middle School 40775 Camino Campos Verdes 1999 6 24 97,653 sq ft $28,433,210 Joan F. Sparkman Alternative Education 32225 Pio Pico Road 1988 3 12 59,705 sq ft $20,435,020 K8 Steam Academy 35780 Abelia Street 2021 4 6 54,424 sq ft $18,904,480 Margarita Middle School 30600 Margarita Road 1990 4 19 114,730 sq ft $37,199,040 Nicolas Valley Elementary School 39600 North General Kearney Road 1990 2 33 78,351 sq ft $22,856,370 Paloma Elementary School 42940 Via Rami 1995 2 16 63,027 sq ft $21,679,810 Pauba Valley Elementary School 33125 Regina Drive 1996 3 10 70,976 sq ft $25,189,980 Rancho Elementary School 31530 La Serena Way 1986 9 0 70,619 sq ft $21,868,310 Red Hawk Elementary School 32045 Camino San Jose 1991 4 2 56,093 sq ft $21,928,830 Susan La Vorgna Elementary School 31777 Algarve 2004 9 1 78,839 sq ft $25,346,810 Temecula Elementary School 41951 Moraga Road 1978 7 1 63,719 sq ft $20,791,200 Temecula Luiseno 45754 Wolf Creek 2005 8 1 78,759 sq ft $25,276,510 Page|183 Name Address Year Built* # of Buildings Bldg. Area (Sq. Ft.) Building Replacement Value ($1,000) Permanent Portable Elementary School Drive North Temecula Middle School 42075 Meadows Parkway 1991 6 16 102,818 sq ft $31,719,950 Temecula Prepatory School 35777 Abelia Street 2006 1 62 74,600 sq ft $12,780,220 Temecula Valley Charter School 35755 Abelia Street 2008 31 1 33,168 sq ft $5,826,040 Temecula Valley High School 31555 Rancho Vista Road 1985 26 38 371,823 sq ft $119,693,420 Tony Tobin Elementary School 45200 Morgan Hill Drive 2005 8 2 80,678 sq ft $24,869,790 Vail Elementary School 29915 Mira Loma Drive 1979 7 3 71,387 sq ft $23,600,710 Vail Ranch Middle School 33340 Camino Piedra Rojo 1994 6 33 105,528 sq ft $29,769,170 Vintage Hills Elementary School 42240 Camino Romo 1997 2 13 68,827 sq ft $24,288,010 Ysabel Barnett Elementary School 39925 Harveston Drive 2001 9 1 78,708 sq ft $25,301,340 TOTAL 292 370 3,298,603 sq ft $985,647,400 Page|184 This page is intentionally left blank Page|185 Date Magnitude Name, Location, or Region Affected Loss of Life and Property 1700, Jan. 26 9.0 Offshore, somewhere between Cape Mendocino and Canada Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. Shook northern California, Oregon, Washington, and southern British Columbia; caused tsunami damage to villages in Japan and western US 1857, Jan 9 7.9 Great Fort Tejon earthquake 1 dead; damage from Monterey to San Bernardino County 1906, Apr 18 7.8 Great 1906 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire 3,000 dead; $524 million in property damage (includes damage from fire) 1838, Jun 7.4 San Francisco to San Juan Bautista Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. Damage to San Francisco and Santa Clara 1872, Mar 26 7.4 Owens Valley 27 dead; 56 injured; $250,000 in property damage 1980, Nov 8 7.4 West of Eureka 6 injured; $2 million in property damage 1812, Dec 8 7.3 Wrightwood Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. 40 dead at San Juan Capistrano 1892, Feb 24 7.3 Laguna Salida, Baja California Damage to San Diego and Imperial Valley 1922, Jan 31 7.3 Offshore, about 70 mi W of Eureka 1952, Jul 21 7.3 Kern County earthquake 12 dead; $60 million in property damage 1954, Dec 16 7.3 Fairview Peak, near Fallon, NV 1992, Jun 28 7.3 Landers 1 dead; 402 injured; $91.1 million in property damage 1923, Jan 22 7.2 Off Cape Mendocino Destructive in Humboldt County; strongly felt in Reno 1932, Dec 21 7.2 Cedar Mountain, near Gabb’s, N 1992, Apr 25 7.2 Petrolia 356 injured; $48.3 million in property damage 1812, Dec 21 7.1 Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. 1 dead 1927, Nov 4 7.1 40 km west of Lompoc Damage in Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo counties 1954, Dec 16 7.1 Dixie Valley, near Fallon, NV 1868, Oct 21 7.0 Hayward Fault 30 dead; $350,000 in property damage 1899, Apr 16 7.0 Offshore, about 80 miles west of Eureka 1934, Dec 31 7.0 In Mexico, about 100 miles SE of El Centro 1940, May 19 7.0 Imperial Valley 9 dead; $6 million in property damage 1991, Aug 17 7.0 Offshore, about 100 miles NW of Eureka Preceded by two quakes (M 6.3 and 6.2) on Aug. 16 and 17 Appendix 6 – List of Significant Earthquakes in California Since 1700 Page|186 Date Magnitude Name, Location, or Region Affected Loss of Life and Property 1994, Sep 1 7.0 Offshore, about 70 miles W of Cape Mendocino 1873, Nov 23 6.9 Crescent City region Damage in California-Oregon border area 1989, Oct 17 6.9 Loma Prieta 63 dead; 3,737 injured; $6 billion in property damage 1872, Mar 26 6.8 Owens Valley Aftershock of previous entry 1872, Apr 11 6.8 Owens Valley Aftershock of March 26, 1872, quake 1890, Feb 9 6.8 San Jacinto fault Little damage 1918, Apr 21 6.8 San Jacinto 1 dead; several injuries; $200,000 in property damage 1925, Jun 29 6.8 Santa Barbara 13 dead; $8 million in property damage 1954, Jul 6 6.8 Rainbow Mountain, near Fallon, NV 1999, Oct 16 7.1 Bullion Mountains (Hector Mine) Minimal injuries and damage due to sparse population in affected area 1954, Aug 24 6.8 Rainbow Mountain, near Fallon, NV 1976, Nov 26 6.8 Offshore, about 100 mi WNW of Eureka 1898, Apr 15 6.7 Fort Bragg - Mendocino Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. Damage from Fort Bragg to Mendocino; 3 houses collapsed; landslides reported 1899, Dec 25 6.7 San Jacinto and Hemet 6 dead; $50,000 in property damage 1994, Jan 17 6.7 Northridge 57 dead; more than 9,000 injured; about $40 billion in property damage 1892, Apr 19 6.6 Vacaville 1 dead; $225,000 in property damage 1915, Nov 21 6.6 In Mexico, about 60 miles S of El Centro 1941, Feb 9 6.6 Offshore, about 65 miles W of Eureka 1954, Dec 21 6.6 East of Arcata 1 dead; several injured; $2.1 million in property damage 1968, Apr 8 6.6 Borrego Mountain 1971, Feb 9 6.6 San Fernando 65 dead; more than 2,000 injured; $505 million in losses 1987, Nov 24 6.6 Superstition Hills part of above damage 1992, Apr 26 6.6 Petrolia Aftershock of the Apr. 25 quake 1992, Apr 26 6.6 Petrolia Another aftershock of Apr. 25 quake 1852, Nov 29 6.5 Near Fort Yuma, Arizona Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. 1860, Mar 15 6.5 Carson City Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. 1865, Oct 8 6.5 Santa Cruz Mountains $0.5 million in property damage 1918, Jul 15 6.5 Offshore, about 40 W of Eureka Page|187 Date Magnitude Name, Location, or Region Affected Loss of Life and Property 1934, Jul 6 6.5 Offshore, about 100 mi WNW of Eureka 1934, Dec 30 6.5 In Mexico, about 40 miles S of El Centro 1947, Apr 10 6.5 East of Yermo 1956, Feb 9 6.5 In Mexico, about 80 miles SW of El Centro 1979, Oct 15 6.5 Imperial Valley 9 injured; $30 million in property damage 1992, June 28 6.5 Big Bear Included with Landers losses, above 2003, Dec 22 6.5 San Simeon 1836, Jun 10 6.4 Near San Juan Bautista Limited data available, magnitude is estimate. Older reports reported quake as possibly larger and centered near Oakland 1898, Mar 31 6.4 Mare Island $350,000 in property damage 1991, Jul 12 6.6 Offshore west of Crescent City 1899, Jul 22 6.4 Wrightwood Chimneys knocked down; landslides reported 1911, Jul 1 6.4 Morgan Hill area 1933, Mar 11 6.4 Long Beach 115 dead; $40 million in property damage 1942, Oct 21 6.4 About 25 miles W of Westmoreland 1983, May 2 6.4 Coalinga 1986, Jul 21 6.4 Chalfant Valley 1800, Nov 22 6.3 San Diego/San Juan Capistrano region Limited data available, magnitude is an estimate. Damaged adobe walls of missions in San Diego and San Juan Capistrano 1922, Mar 10 6.3 Parkfield 1995, Feb 19 6.3 Offshore, about 70 miles W of Cape Mendocino 1980, May 25 6.2 Mammoth Lakes 1984, Apr 24 6.2 Morgan Hill $8 million in property damage 1908, Nov 4 6.0 SW of Death Valley 1948, Dec 4 6.0 East of Yermo 1980, May 25 6.0 Mammoth Lakes 1987, Oct 1 6.0 Whittier Narrows 8 dead; $358 million in property damage to 10,500 homes and businesses Page|188 This page is intentionally left blank Page|189 Appendix 7 – Public Survey Results Page|190 Page|191 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Accept Easements Dedicated to the Public in Connection with the Sommers Bend Development and Authorization to Quitclaim Said Easement to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant Ron Moreno, Assistant Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE TRANSFER TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA’S INTEREST IN AND TO A CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO TRACT MAP 37368 AND TRACT MAP 37341-13 IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOMMERS BEND SOUTH LOOP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BACKGROUND: Certain storm drain and drainage easements were dedicated to the public pursuant to (i) Tract Map 37368, which was recorded on July 25, 2019 at Pages 89-98 of Book 468 of Official Records of the County of Riverside, and (ii) Tract Map 37341-13, which was recorded on July 16, 2020 at Pages 87-93 of Book 473 of Official Records of the County of Riverside. The City Clerk’s Statement on Tract Map 37368 and Tract Map 37341-13 confirms that the City accepted the dedication of said easements. The construction of the Sommers Bend South Loop Road Improvements required in connection with Tract Map 37368 and Tract Map 37341-13 is completed. Pursuant to the Joint Community Facilities Cooperative Agreement for Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 03-02 Roripaugh Ranch (Cooperative Agreement) entered into between the City of Temecula (City), Temecula Public Financing Authority, the Temecula Community Services, District, the County of Riverside, and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), which was recorded on January 1, 2005, the parties agreed that upon completion of construction of the storm drain and drainage improvements constructed in connection with the Sommers Bend South Loop Road, the easements for the maintenance of said flood control improvements would be transferred to the District. The District has found the flood control improvements were constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications, and is prepared to accept the storm drain improvements for operation and maintenance of the subject storm drain and drainage facilities constructed in accordance with the dedicated easements. Pursuant to the attached Quitclaim Deed, the City will quitclaim to the District all of the City’s interests in and to the subject easement described in the Quitclaim Deed in accordance with the terms of the Joint Community Facilities Cooperative Agreement for Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 03-02 Roripaugh Ranch recorded on January 1, 2005 (Cooperative Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, the District will assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for the storm drain and drainage improvements constructed in the area of the subject easement after satisfactory completion of said improvements. Approval of the Resolution would authorize the City to quitclaim to the District the City’s interest and rights in and to the storm and drainage easement dedicated on Tract Map 37368 and Tract Map 37341-13 that is described more particularly in the legal description and plat map attached to the Quitclaim Deed. This would enable the District to maintain the subject storm and drainage improvements constructed in the area of the subject easement in accordance with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement. City Staff recommends the acceptance of the Quitclaim Deed conveying the subject storm drain and drainage easements to the District. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will be relieved of maintenance responsibility for the subject storm drain. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Quitclaim Deed 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A QUITCLAIM DEED FOR THE TRANSFER TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA’S INTEREST IN AND TO A CERTAIN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC PURSUANT TO TRACT MAP 37368 AND TRACT MAP 37341-13 IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOMMERS BEND SOUTH LOOP ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula (City) is a municipal corporation, located in the County of Riverside, State of California. The City has been working with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) to ensure that the District has the rights necessary to maintain certain storm drain and drainage improvements constructed in connection with the Sommers Bend South Loop Road. B. On January 1, 2005, the Joint Community Facilities Cooperative Agreement for Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 03-02 Roripaugh Ranch (Cooperative Agreement). The Cooperative Agreement required that upon completion of construction of the storm drain and drainage improvements constructed in connection with the Sommers Bend South Loop Road, the easements for the maintenance of said flood control improvements would be transferred to the District. The District has found the flood control improvements were constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications. C. The City seeks to quitclaim to the District the City’s interests in and to the subject storm drain and drainage easements that were dedicated to the City pursuant to the Tract Map 37368, which was recorded on July 25, 2019 at Pages 89-98 of Book 468 of Official Records of the County of Riverside. The City Clerk’s Statement on Tract Map 37368 confirms that the City accepted the storm drain and drainage easements dedicated on said map. D. The City also seeks to quitclaim to the District the City’s interests in and to the subject drainage easement dedicated to the public pursuant to Tract Map 37341-13, which was recorded on July 16, 2020 at Pages 87-93 of Book 473 of Official Records of the County of Riverside. The City Clerk’s Statement on Tract Map 37341-13 confirms that the City accepted the easement for public drainage purposes dedicated on said map. 2 E. The subject storm drain and drainage easements dedicated pursuant to Tract Map 37368 and Tract Map 37341-13 are located on portions of the real property identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 964-770-010, 964-770-011 and 964-770-012. The City’s quitclaim to the District of the subject storm drain and drainage easement described more particularly in the Exhibits to the attached Quitclaim Deed is consistent with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement. Section 2. Approval of Quitclaim Deeds. The City Council hereby approves the attached Quitclaim Deed, with such changes as may be mutually agreed upon by Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the City Manager. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Quitclaim Deed on behalf of the City. A copy of the final Quitclaim Deed, when executed by the City Manager, shall be placed on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Section 3. City Manager’s Authority. The City Manager (or his designee), is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City, to take all actions necessary and convenient to quitclaim to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District the City’s interest in and to the subject storm drain and drainage easement described more particularly in the Quitclaim Deed. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 250164 Recorded at request of, and return to: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, California 92501 NO FEE (GOV. CODE 6103) SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE Santa Gertrudis Valley - The undersigned grantor(s) declare(s) South Loop Road Storm Drain, Stage 2 DDT: - 0 - THE CONVEYANCE IS TO A GOVERNMENTAL Sommers Bend Storm Drain ENTITY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION R&T 11922 Project No. 7-0-00327 Tract No. 37368/TR 37341-13 APNs 964-770-010, 964-770-011 and 964-770-012 QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, does hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, a body corporate and politic, all right, title and interest in and to that said storm drain easement dedicated for the purpose of construction and maintenance of flood control facilities, located in real property situated in the city of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: See legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and "B", and made part hereof, to be referenced hereafter as RCFC Parcel No. 7327-500. CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation: Date By: Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTESTS: Randi Johl, Clerk to the City of Temecula By: City Clerk (SEAL) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by Quitclaim Deed, dated from CITY OF TEMECULA ("Grantor"), a municipal corporation to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ("Grantee"), a body corporate and politic, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer on behalf of the Board of Supervisors of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District pursuant to authority conferred by Resolution No. 474 of the Board of Supervisors of said District adopted on May 12, 1961, and the Grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Date: By: JASON E. UHLEY General Manager-Chief Engineer Project: Santa Gertrudis Valley – South Loop Road Storm Drain, Stage 2 Sommers Bend Storm Drain Project No. 7 -0-00327 RCFC Parcel No. 7327-500 AU:amh Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve Tract Maps 37925, 37926 and 37928 (Located at the Northwest Corner of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road) ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Assistant Director of Public Works Annie Bostre-Le, Public Works Development Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Maps 37925, 37926, and 37928 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; and 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the Developer; and 3. Approve the Subdivision Monumentation Agreement with the Developer; and 4. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. BACKGROUND: Tract Maps 37925, 37926 and 37928 have been approved for subdivision purposes. A table has been provided below to summarize each of the tracts with its corresponding information. All the tracts are located within Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, now known as “Sommers Bend”. Tract Map # of single family lots # of open space lot(s) Acreage Planning Area # within Sommers Bend 37925 13 1 8.12 10 37926 104 2 16.01 12 37928 15 2 11.60 33A Securities have been posted for the public improvements and monumentation as conditioned by the approval of the Tentative Parcel Maps at Planning Commission on October 21, 2020. The property owner/developer, Unicom Global, has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map recordation, and these Tract Maps are in conformance with the approved Tentative Tract Maps. The approval of a Subdivision Map, which substantially complies with the approved Tentative Tract Maps, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. All fees have been paid. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report 2. Vicinity Map 3. Tract Map 37925 4. Tract Map 37926 5. Tract Map 37928 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAPS 37925, 37926, and 37928 Date: July 11, 2023 TRACT MAP FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY LABOR & MATERIAL SECURITY MONUMENTATION SECURITY 37925 $ 531,000 $ 265,500 $ 9,460 37926 $ 2,279,000 $ 1,139,500 $ 41,480 37928 $ 475,000 $ 237,500 $ 8,960 TRACT MAP 37925 VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT N.T.S. WAY LA SERENA AULD RD NICOLAS RD RD MARGARITA STAGE RDBUTTERFIELD RD CANTRELLR DPOURROY SPRINGS RD MURRIETA HOT SITE 79 VICINITY MAP SCALE:DATE:NA \\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Survey\PA10 17883HMO\17883Eplt03_VMap.dgn c Rick Engineering Company2023PLOT DATE:JN 17883E14-JUN-2023 JUNE 14, 2023 Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Establish All-Way Stop Control at the Intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF WOLF CREEK DRIVE NORTH AND REDWOOD ROAD/ALPINE PLACE AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES BACKGROUND: In December 2022, City of Temecula staff received a citizen request to consider the feasibility of implementing all way stop controls to address concerns of excessive speeding and unsafe pedestrian conditions at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place (Exhibit A). The citizen referenced concerns with speeding and unsafe pedestrian crossings at this intersection specifically during pickup and drop-off times for nearby schools as there are no convenient controlled pedestrian crossings nearby. The request for an all way stop and pedestrian controls at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place would be to provide additional controlled access for students heading to/from Erle Stanley Gardner Middle School and Temecula Luiseno Elementary School. In January 2023, field reviews were performed by staff at this intersection and, based on vehicular and pedestrian activity observed, it was determined that the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place warranted further analysis for stop and pedestrian controls. Wolf Creek Drive North is a forty-four (44) foot wide residential collector roadway providing access to numerous single-family residences between Wolf Valley Road and Pechanga Parkway. The posted speed limit on Wolf Creek Drive North is 30 MPH and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on is approximately 4,990 ADT. Recent speed data collection confirmed an 85th percentile speed of 38 MPH for this stretch of Wolf Creek Drive North. Redwood Road is a fifty-four (54) foot wide residential collector roadway that provides access to Wolf Creek Drive North and Loma Linda Road for numerous single-family residences located within the area. Redwood Road has a speed limit of 30 MPH and carries approximately 1,048 ADT. Alpine Place is a thirty-six (36) foot wide local residential roadway that provides access to Wolf Creek Drive North for numerous single-family residences located within the neighborhood. Alpine Place has a speed limit of 25 MPH and carries approximately 297 ADT. In February 2023, staff generated speed and volume data between February 2022 thru April 2022 using Streetlight Data software. Over this three (3) month period, review of prevailing (85th percentile) speeds indicates that speeds vary from 36 to 39 miles per hour during peak AM and PM hours on posted 30 MPH segments of Wolf Creek Drive North. The result s of the speed data review indicate that most speeding is occurring during peak AM and PM hours. The collected volume data was used to evaluate entering volumes and prevailing speeds for the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place. In addition to the data collection, a review of intersection characteristics and conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of sight distance, collision history, and completion of a multi-way stop warrant analysis at both intersections. An evaluation of sight distance was performed at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 200 feet is required for the posted 30 mph speed limit on Wolf Creek Drive North. The results of the evaluation are shown in the table below: Location Sight Distance Required Visibility (Posted 30 MPH) Redwood Road (Southbound)  Looking East  Looking West Alpine Place (Northbound)  Looking East  Looking West 450’ 420’ 300’ 265’ 200’ 200’ 200’ 200’ As shown, the visibility at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place is more than adequate for the posted speed limit. A review of the collision history for the three (3) year period from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2022, indicates there were no (0) reported collisions at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place. The Multi-Way Stop Sign Installation Policy for Residential Streets’ warrant criteria was used to evaluate the need for multi-way stop signs at the intersection. The warrants allow for the installation of multi-way stop signs when the following conditions are satisfied: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches is equal to or greater than three hundred (300) vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day; and b. The combined vehicular volume and pedestrian volume from the minor street is equal to or greater than one hundred (100) per hour for the same eight (8) hours. 2. Collision History a. Three (3) or more reported collisions within a twelve (12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. 3. Roadway Characteristics a. The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, b. The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs. c. The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) split; and d. Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. Warrants for Minimum Traffic Volumes, Collision History and Roadway Characteristics must be met to justify the installation of a multi-way stop. Other criteria that may be considered when evaluating the need for multi-way stop signs include: 4. Visibility a. The intersections sight distance is less than:  150 feet for 25 MPH  200 feet for 30 MPH  250 feet for 35 MPH 5. The need to control left-turn conflicts. 6. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. 7. The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route to School plan. 8. There are no traffic signals or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of the intersection. 9. The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. The multi-way stop warrant analysis performed found that the required Warrants 1, 2 & 3 were not satisfied and all-way stop controls are not justified at the intersection based on quantitative data. The Policy does however provide the flexibility to consider the need to control vehicle and pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. During field reviews, staff noticed elevated amounts of pedestrian traffic based on the intersection being near Erle Stanley Gardner Middle School and Temecula Luiseno Elementary School. Staff observed that many of these school age pedestrians were crossing the uncontrolled without paying close attention to vehicles and their surroundings. Staff observed elevated speeds by motorists on Wolf Creek Drive and witnessed several close calls with distracted pedestrians. Based on the review of the intersection under these criteria, and the fact that it acts as a suggested school route between multiple schools in the area, staff has determined there is justification for all-way stop controls at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place. Staff recommends establishing all-way stop controls and striped pedestrian crosswalks at the intersection of Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with the recommended action. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A - Location Map 3. Exhibit B - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF WOLF CREEK DRIVE NORTH AND REDWOOD ROAD/ALPINE PLACE AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for stop signs at the location described in this resolution. A. The City Council hereby finds and determines the installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance public health, safety, and general welfare at the intersection. B. The City Council hereby finds the proposed stop signs will not create any adverse conditions in the area and the action is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15301(c) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following All-Way Stop Intersection is hereby established in the City of Temecula: Wolf Creek Drive North and Redwood Road/Alpine Place PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk N➤➤N Major Street: 30 MPH Minor Street:30/25 MPH Yes No X 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM Hour Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Ped Volume (All Parts Below Must Be Satisfied) 2.Collision History Satisfied Satisfied Options (Other Criteria That May Be Considered) B.The intersection has four (4) legs, with the streets extending 600 feet or more away The intersection sight distance is less than: 150 feet for 25 MPH split, and 303 272 147 63 253 81 64 63 79 546 365 200 feet for 30 MPH 0 (Minor Street) 3.Roadway Characteristics from the intersection on at least three (3) of the legs, D.Both streets are 44 feet wide or narrower. 4.Visibility C.The vehicular volumes on both streets are nearly equal to a forty/sixty percent (40/60%) A.The traffic volume on the uncontrolled street exceeds two thousand (2,000) vehicles per day, 1.Minimum Vehicular Volume Wolf Valley Creek Drive North Redwood Road/Alpine Place Wararnts 1, 2, and 3 Must Be Satisfied MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Total All 335Approaches Combined Vehicular MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT (Residential Streets) Critical Approach Speed Critical Approach Speed Satisfied NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS 300 422 5.The need to control left-turn conflicts. 8.There are no traffic signal or all-way stop controls located within 600 feet of 7.The roadways and intersection appear on a Suggested Route School plan. 6.The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes such as schools, parks and activity centers. the intersection. 9.The installation of multi-way stop signs is compatible with overall traffic circulation needs of the residential area. 250 feet for 35 MPH Satisfied 519 236 100 472 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 3 OR MORE Exhibit B Item No. 10 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve First Amendment with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc. for Lake and Pond Maintenance Services for Fiscal Years 2024-27 ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc., to provide Lake and Pond Maintenance Services for Fiscal Years 2024-27, in the amount of $600,000. BACKGROUND: On June 14, 2022, City Council approved an agreement with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc. for lake and pond maintenance services in the amount of $150,000 for Fiscal Year 2022-23. The First Amendment will extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2027, and increase payment in the amount of $600,000, for a total agreement amount of $750,000. Diversified Waterscapes, Inc., has an extensive knowledge in the management of lakes and ponds and has satisfactorily provided these services to the City for a number of years. As a res ult, staff is recommending the approval of an amendment with Diversified Waterscapes, Inc. for Lake and Pond Maintenance Services through FY 2024-27. The original agreement provides for price adjustments in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Statistical Area each fiscal year, and upon mutual agreement between the City and Contractor, may extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms, and in no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2027. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds will be made available in the Annual Operating Budget (AOB) in each of the Fiscal Years 2024-27. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01 ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Ryan Castillo, Supervising Public Works Inspector RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2021-22, PW22-01, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On July 26, 2022, the City Council awarded a construction contract to LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. in the amount of $272,369.97 and authorized the City Manager to approve changes up to $27,237 to construct the Citywide Concrete Repairs Fiscal Year 2021-22 Project, PW22-01. On January 24, 2023, the City Council approved an increase to the contingency in the amount of $40,000. The completed project included repairs to concrete facilities at over 70 locations. Existing curb and gutter, sidewalks, access ramps, cross gutters, and under sidewalk drains were removed and replaced. In addition, concrete access ramps and crosswalk striping were upgraded to ADA standards at several locations within school areas at Vail Elementary School, Pauba Elementary School, and Helen Hunt Jackson Elementary School. The increase to the contingency covered the installation of a curb ramp and striping at the intersection of Regina Drive and Garoli Pass and the replacement of curb and gutter and a commercial driveway at 28030 Del Rio Road. LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works / City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from March 17, 2023, the date the City obtained “beneficial use” of the Project. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The final contract amount is $338,876.47, which includes the original contract amount of $272,369.97 and three contract change orders totaling $66,506.50. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the Project and filing of the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor’s Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER’S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ N O T I C E O F C O M P L E T I O N NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. 620 Alpine Way Escondido, CA to perform the following work of improvement: CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 Project No. PW22-01 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that sa id work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on July 11, 2023. That upon said contract the Argonaut Insurance Company was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 Project No. PW22-01 6. The location of said property is: Citywide, Temecula, California. Dated at Temecula, California, this July 11, 2023. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this July 11, 2023. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk 2022-221 SURETY BOND REVIEW FORM The attached surety bond(s) have been reviewed in the following amount(s): PROJECT: Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2021-22, PW22-01 CONTRACTOR: L.C. Paving, Inc. SURETY BOND TYPE BOND NUMBER BOND AMOUNT Argonaut Insurance Company c/o CMGIA Maintenance CMGP00006101 $33,887.65 The surety company is is not an admitted company in the State of California:  Financial Strength Rating: A- XII  A.M. Best #: 002056  NAIC #: 19801  CA Company ID #: 1523-0 Insurance Verified By: 06/14/2023 Risk Management Division Date Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Date NOTES: • Sole Signature; Corporate Docs attached Item No. 12 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 13, 2023 CALL TO ORDER at 6:54 PM: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Brown, Kalfus, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Brown. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 18. Approve Action Minutes of May 23, 2023 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the Action Minutes of May 23, 2023. 19. Approve Agreement with Timmy D’ Productions, Inc. for Entertainment and Technical Services Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the agreement with Timmy D’ Productions, Inc. for entertainment and technical services in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for the five-year term of 2023-2028. 20. Approve Second Amendment with T & G Global, LLC dba St. Nick’s for Holiday Decor Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the second amendment with T & G Global, LLC dba St. Nick’s for amended scope of work for holiday decor and increased payment, for a total agreement amount of $300,000 over the term of the agreement through June 30, 2024. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 6:58 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, June 27, 2023 at 4:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James Stewart, President ATTEST: _______________________________ Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 13 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Erica Russo, Director of Community Services DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Anthony J. Moramarco dba Bigfoot Graphics for Graphic Design, Event and Professional Goods and Services ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Community Services Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the agreement with Anthony J. Moramarco dba Bigfoot Graphics for graphic design, event and professional goods and services. BACKGROUND: Dependable, professional vendors play an essential role in supporting the Community Services Department by providing second-to-none services. Bigfoot Graphics has a long history of providing high quality events, classes, programs and activities for Temecula residents and visitors. This includes mural coordination, Cartoon-A-Paloozah planning, and assistance with the Guide to Leisure Services Brochure. The referenced five-year agreement will provide for continued support for event entertainment, graphic design artwork, logo creation and consultation, design and production of signs and banners, design and production of promotional merchandise, apparel, and other goods and services as needed and requested; and demonstrations and art workshops. FISCAL IMPACT: The five-year agreement is for a total of $200,000. Adequate funds have been requested as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Operating Budget. Funds for future fiscal years will be requested as part of the normal annual budget process. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement Item No. 14 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Erica Russo, Director of Community Services DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with BAMM Promotional Products, Inc. for Screen Printing, Embroidery, Artwork, and Promotional Items ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Community Services Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the agreement with BAMM Promotional Products, Inc. for screen printing, embroidery, artwork, and promotional items. BACKGROUND: Dependable, professional vendors play an essential role in supporting the Community Services Department by providing second-to-none services. BAMM Promotional Products, Inc. has been providing high quality screen printing and embroidery work for events, programs, activities, and staff uniforms for over 15 years. The referenced five-year agreement will provide for continued support for these items. FISCAL IMPACT: The five-year agreement is for a total of $200,000. Adequate funds have been requested as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Annual Operating Budget for this multi- year agreement. Funds for future fiscal years will be requested as part of the normal annual budget process. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Reconfirming the Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Local Development Mitigation Fee Applicable to All Developments in the Plan Area Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.10.050.d ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Michelle Amezcua, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECONFIRMING THE AUTOMATIC ANNUAL FEE ADJUSTMENT IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PLAN AREA PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.10.050.D AND MAKING CEQA FINDINGS (LR23-0221) BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula (“City”) is a member agency of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“RCA”), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and the eighteen cities located in western Riverside County. The member agencies of RCA recognized that a habitat conservation plan is necessary to provide special protections for vegetation communities and natural areas containing habitat values to prevent future endangerment of the plant and animal species impacted by new development i n western Riverside County. In order to address these issues, the member agencies formulated a plan called the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (the “MSHCP”) in which a mitigation fee would be assessed on new development and would be used to fund the implementation of the MSHCP. In furtherance of the MSHCP, the City adopted Resolution 2021-18 approving and adopting the updated “Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update,” dated October 2020. ANALYSIS: Chapter 15.10 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the "Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee Ordinance," authorizes the City Council to impose the Local Development Mitigation Fee upon new development. Section 15.10.050.A. of the Temecula Municipal Code authorizes the City to adopt an applicable Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule by resolution. On April 15, 2021, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-18 that approved the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. Section 15.10.050.D of the Temecula Municipal Code provides for an Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in accordance with the RCA’s MSHCP Implementing Agreement: “D. Automatic annual fee adjustment. In addition to the periodic fee adjustment mentioned above, the RCA shall provide the city with an automatic annual fee adjustment for the local development mitigation fee established by this chapter as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual.” Additionally, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2021-18 also provides for an Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in accordance with the RCA’s MSHCP Implementing Agreement: “Section 8. In addition to the Periodic Fee Adjustment mentioned above, the RCA shall provide the City with an automatic annual fee adjustment for the Local Development Mitigation Fee established by this Resolution as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual adopted pursuant to the Local Development Mitigation Fee Ordinance.” Pursuant to Section 15.10.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2021- 18, RCA’s MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual and past practice, the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee adjusts annually by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). RCA has determined that based on the CPI increase for Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario, CA, that the MSHCP fees will increase 7.33% effective July 1, 2023. RCA has provided the City with revised MSHCP fees as provided in Section 3 of the proposed Resolution. The fees collected pursuant to the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the 2020 Nexus Study. AUTOMATIC MSCHP FEE ADJUSTMENT: For the period of July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be increased by the CPI, 7.33%, as follows: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023, TO JUNE 30, 2024) Fee Category Fee Residential, density between 8.0 and 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $1,766 Residential, density less than 8.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $4,236 Residential density greater than 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $781 Commercial (fee per acre) $19,066 Industrial (fee per acre) $19,066 In the event the proposed Resolution and Resolution No. 2021-18 are not further amended by July 1, 2024, the Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be the fee described in Section 5 of Resolution No. 2021-18.” FISCAL IMPACT: There will be a 7.33% increase in the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fees to be paid by new development. The MSHCP fees the City collects are pass-through payments. The City collects the payment at time of Building permit issuance and then passes through those payments to RCA, on or before the 30th day of the month following the date the fee payment was received. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Staff has determined that the Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines because CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of (a) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits or (b) obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. Staff has also determined, on a separate and independent basis, the Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA. Finally, on a separate and independent basis, the Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines because it implements the Fee as adopted by Resolution No. 2021-18. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. WRCRCA Notice of Implementation Fee Letter FY 2023-24 3. Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule FY2023-24 4. Notice of Public Hearing 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECONFIRMING THE AUTOMATIC ANNUAL FEE ADJUSTMENT IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PLAN AREA PURSUANT TO TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 15.10.050.D AND MAKING CEQA FINDINGS (LR23-0221) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. (a) The City of Temecula (“City”) is a member agency of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (“RCA”), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and the eighteen cities located in western Riverside County. (b) The member agencies of RCA recognized that a habitat conservation plan is necessary to provide special protections for vegetation communities and natural areas containing habitat values to prevent future endangerment of the plant and animal species impacted by new development in western Riverside County. (c) In order to address these issues, the member agencies formulated a plan called the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (the “MSHCP”) whereby a mitigation fee would be assessed on new development and would be used to fund the implementation of the MSHCP. (d) In furtherance of the MSHCP, the City adopted Resolution 2021-18 approving and adopting the updated “Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update,” dated October 2020. (e) Chapter 15.10 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the "Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee Ordinance," was adopted pursuant to California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. and authorizes the City Council to impose the Local Development Mitigation Fee upon new development. (f) Section 15.10.050.A. of the Temecula Municipal Code authorizes the City to adopt an applicable Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule by resolution. (g) Resolution No. 2021-18 adopted the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee. 2 (h) Section 15.10.050.D of the Temecula Municipal Code provides for an Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in accordance with the RCA’s MSHCP Implementing Agreement: “D. Automatic annual fee adjustment. In addition to the periodic fee adjustment mentioned above, the RCA shall provide the city with an automatic annual fee adjustment for the local development mitigation fee established by this chapter as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual.” (i) Additionally, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2021-18 provides for an Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment in accordance with the RCA’s MSHCP Implementing Agreement: “Section 8. In addition to the Periodic Fee Adjustment mentioned above, the RCA shall provide the City with an automatic annual fee adjustment for the Local Development Mitigation Fee established by this Resolution as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual adopted pursuant to the Local Development Mitigation Fee Ordinance.” (j) Pursuant to Section 15.10.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Section 8 of Resolution No. 2021-18, RCA’s MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual and past practice, the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee adjusts annually by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). RCA has determined that based on the CPI increase for Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario, CA, that the MSHCP fees will increase 7.33% effective July 1, 2023. RCA has provided the City with revised MSHCP fees as provided in Section 3. (k) The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the 2020 Nexus Study. The MSHCP fees the City collects are pass-through payments. The City collects the payment at time of Building permit issuance and then passes through those payments to RCA, on or before the 30th day of the month following the date the fee payment was received. Section 2. California Environmental Quality Act Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby make the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of the Local Development Mitigation Fee: (a) The Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the CEQA Guidelines because CEQA does not apply to the establishment, modification, structuring, restructuring, or approval of rates, tolls, fares, or other charges by public agencies which the public agency finds are for the purpose of (a) meeting operating expenses, including employee wage rates and fringe benefits or (b) obtaining funds for capital projects necessary to maintain service within existing service areas. (b) Further, on a separate and independent basis, the Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to Section 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines because 3 the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities, which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may resul t in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, is not a “project” for purposes of CEQA. (c) Further, on a separate and independent basis, the Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted by this Resolution is not subject to the requirements of CEQA and the City’s CEQA Guidelines because it implements the Fee as adopted by Resolution No. 2021-18. Section 3. Adoption of Adjusted Local Development Mitigation Fee. Based on the foregoing, the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby amend Section 5 of Resolution No. 2021-18 to read as follows: “A. For the period of July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024, the Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be as follows: WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 (EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2023, TO JUNE 30, 2024) Fee Category Fee Residential, density between 8.0 and 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $1,766 Residential, density less than 8.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $4,236 Residential density greater than 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $781 Commercial (fee per acre) $19,066 Industrial (fee per acre) $19,066 “B. In the event this Resolution and Resolution No. 2021-18 are not further amended by July 1, 2024. the Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be the fee set forth in Section 5 of Resolution No. 2021-18.” Section 4. Effective Date of the Adjusted Local Development Mitigation Fee. The adjusted Local Development Mitigation Fee established by Section 3 of this Resolution shall be effective on July 1, 2023. 4 Section 5. Effect on Resolution No. 2021-18. Except as provided in Section 3 of this Resolution, all other terms and provisions of Resolution No. 2021-18 shall remain in full force and effect. Section 6. Severability. This Resolution and the various parts, sections, and clauses thereof, are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Resolution, or its application to any person entity is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall affect only such part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Resolution, or person or entity; and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provision, parts, sentences, paragraphs, sections, or clauses of this Resolution, or its application to other persons or entities. The City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been adopted had such unconstitutional or invalid part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Resolution not been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted from the application of this Resolution. If the fees collected for the conservation of the land, including the monitoring and management thereof, are later adjudged by a final unappealable judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, the prior Local Development Mitigation Fee adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 2021-18 shall each be revived and shall continue for the life of the MSHCP until modified by resolution of the City Council. Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk April 17, 2023 Luke Watson City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92589 RE: NOTICE TO IMPLEMENT THE MSHCP LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE CPI ADJUSTMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 Dear Commuunity Development Director: In accordance with the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual and past practice, the MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee (LDMF) adjusts annually by the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Fee ordinances and resolutions adopted by the County of Riverside and cities pursuant to the MSHCP Implementing Agreement reflect this requirement. Based on the CPI increase for Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario, CA, MSHCP fees will increase 7.33 percent effective July 1, 2023. Member Agencies are required to implement the automatic CPI adjustment, effective July 1, 2023, and begin collecting fees at the Fiscal Year 2024 rates, as outlined in the attached. Outreach efforts to ensure local development mitigation fees are properly assessed include, but are not limited to, the following: • Updated fee forms are provided electronically to the Finance/Community Development/Planning Departments and posted to the RCA website at https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/ • Notification of the fee adjustment is posted the RCA website http://www.wrc- rca.org/development-applications/permits-and-fees/ for public awareness. • Updated MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual is posted to the RCA website at https://www.wrc-rca.org/document-library/ • MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual FAQ and Accessory Dwelling Unit and Renovations (Additions) Decision Map are posted to the RCA website at https://www.wrc-rca.org/document- library/ • RCA staff are developing LDMF fee training that will be available to Member Agencies later in the calendar year. Planning Directors April 17, 2023 Page 2 If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact Jennifer Fuller, Financial Administration Manager, at (951) 787-7141. Sincerely, Anne Mayer Executive Director Attachment cc: James Stewart, RCA Board Member Aaron Adams, City Manager Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 (Effective July 1, 2023 – June 30, 2024) Fee Category Fee Residential, density less than 8.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $4,236 Residential, density between 8.0 and 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $1,766 Residential density greater than 14.0 dwelling units per acre (fee per dwelling unit) $781 Commercial (fee per acre) $19,066 Industrial (fee per acre) $19,066 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: Long Range Planning Project No. LR23-0221, Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan Fee Update Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide PROPOSAL: Adopt a Resolution reconfirming the automatic annual fee adjustment in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Local Development Mitigation Fee applicable to all developments in the plan area pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.10.050.d. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), staff has determined that the resolution is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines and that there is no possibility that adoption of the resolution would have a significant impact on the environment. PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: July 11, 2023 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to Michelle Amezcua, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 506-5189. AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS RELATED TO THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION. Pursuant to Government Code sections 66016, 66017, and 66018, the City will: (a) make available to the public, at least ten (10) days prior to its public hearing, data indicating the estimated cost required to provide the facilities and infrastructure for which these development fees are levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide those facilities and infrastructure; (b) mail notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to this meeting to all interested parties that have requested notice of new or increased development fees. This data is included in the 2020 Nexus Study and the proposed resolution that will be posted on the City’s website not less than ten (10 days) prior to the public hearing. If you would like further information about the proposed MSHCP Fee Resolution, please contact Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager, at (951) 694-6415. JUDICIAL REVIEW. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution to Approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2023-24 ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 BACKGROUND: On May 23, 2023, the Public Works Department requested the City Council to Set the Public Hearing to Adopt a Resolution to Approve Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2023-24. On or before May 27, 2023, the City mailed notices to all affected business and/or commercial customers in the City with regards to the proposed rate increase for refuse collection and recycling services. At this time, the forty-five (45) day public hearing notice has concluded without a majority protest. In accordance with the Franchise Agreement between the City of Temecula and CR&R Incorporated stipulates the conditions upon which rates may be adjusted on an annual basis. Per the agreement, these rates shall be adjusted each July 1st to reflect the changes in various applicable indices. The commercial rates are due to adjust for fiscal year 2023-24, to include a 9.31% increase due to change in CPI, and a 7.3%, or $2.59 per ton increase in the landfill disposal rates. Commercial rates vary based on the bin size and frequency of collection. A comparison of the current and proposed rates is provided in the attached Exhibit A City of Temecula – Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution and approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers, effective July 1, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: Solid Waste and Recycling services for Commercial Customers are paid for directly by the property owner or business owner receiving services. No additional costs will be incurred by the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A City of Temecula – Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2023- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council does find, determine and declare that: (a) The City of Temecula and CR & R Incorporated entered into an exclusive solid waste Franchise Agreement on May 28, 1991, as amended on August 27,1996, June 24, 1997, July 25, 2000, June 13, 2006, October 27, 2015, November 28, 2017, and September 27, 2022, for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary bin/roll off services in the City. (b) Pursuant to the Franchise Agreement it specifically provides for rate adjustments which may be adjusted on an annual basis, and they shall be adjusted each July 1 st, based on certain criteria, and subject to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and changes to the County of Riverside landfill tipping fees, and any extraordinary costs which may be as a result of State mandated programs. (c) According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics for January 2022 through December 2022, the designated CPI has increased by 9.31%. (d) The County of Riverside’s Waste Management Department will adjust their landfill disposal rate by 7.3%, or $2.59 per ton. (e) The City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on July 11, 2023, on the proposed solid waste and recycling rates for commercial customers for fiscal year 2023-24. (f) The City Clerk published said notice of the time and place of the hearing pursuant to Government Code Section 6066 in the manner required by law. (g) Each affected commercial customer and commercial property owner in the City of Temecula was mailed notice of the proposed rate increase in the manner provided by law at least forty-five (45) days prior to the public hearing set on July 11, 2023. (h) At the public hearing, the City Council heard and considered any/all public comments, objections, or protests related to the proposed commercial rates. (i) Revenues derived from the proposed commercial rates shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property related service. 2 (j) Revenues derived from the proposed commercial rates shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the proposed commercial rates are imposed. (k) The amount of the proposed commercial rates do not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel. (l) The proposed commercial rates are being imposed for a service that is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the properties in question. (m) All legal requirements for the adoption of the maximum rates for commercial solid waste collection, including without limitation, Section 1, Section 6 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution, Assessment And Property-Related Fee Reform, have been fulfilled. Section 2. The City Council hereby overrules all protests and objections to the proposed commercial rate increases. Section 3. The City Council hereby approves the maximum rates for commercial solid waste collection set forth on Exhibit A, “City of Temecula – Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of July, 2023. Zak Schwank, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2023- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of July, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Commercial. industrial, and multi-family Proposed Rate Current Rate 2 cubic yard refuse bin 1 x week 138.15$ 127.49$ 2 x week 274.81$ 253.58$ 3 x week 411.42$ 379.62$ 4 x week 548.05$ 505.68$ 5 x week 684.69$ 631.75$ 6 x week 821.31$ 757.80$ 7 x week 957.96$ 883.88$ Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate:2.5 x monthly rate 3 cubic yard refuse bin 1 x week 157.36$ 145.50$ 2 x week 313.20$ 289.57$ 3 x week 469.08$ 433.68$ 4 x week 624.92$ 577.75$ 5 x week 780.71$ 721.78$ 6 x week 936.56$ 865.86$ 7 x week 1,092.43$ 1,009.96$ Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly:2.5 x monthly rate 3 cubic yard recycling bin 1 x week 67.54$ 61.79$ 2 x week 135.06$ 123.56$ 3 x week 202.58$ 185.33$ 4 x week 270.09$ 247.09$ 5 x week 337.56$ 308.82$ 6 x week 405.12$ 370.63$ 7 x week 472.60$ 432.36$ 4 cubic yard refuse bin 1 x week 176.61$ 163.55$ 2 x week 351.74$ 325.71$ 3 x week 526.85$ 487.85$ 4 x week 701.98$ 650.01$ 5 x week 877.08$ 812.14$ 6 x week 1,052.18$ 974.27$ 7 x week 1,227.31$ 1,136.43$ Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rate:2.5 x monthly rate 4 cubic yard recycling bin 1 x week 89.39$ 81.78$ 2 x week 178.85$ 163.62$ 3 x week 268.22$ 245.38$ 4 x week 357.64$ 327.19$ 5 x week 447.05$ 408.99$ 6 x week 536.47$ 490.79$ 7 x week 625.84$ 572.55$ 96-gallon recycling cart 1 x week 60.29$ 55.16$ Commercial Organic AD Rates Proposed Rate Current Rate Non-food 2-yard bin 1 x week 176.04$ 162.62$ 2 x week 350.85$ 324.12$ 3 x week 525.67$ 485.62$ 4 x week 700.49$ 647.13$ 5 x week 875.33$ 808.65$ 6 x week 1,050.13$ 970.14$ 7 x week 1,224.96$ 1,131.65$ Food 2-yard bin 1 x week 262.73$ 243.41$ 2 x week 524.26$ 485.73$ 3 x week 785.77$ 728.02$ 4 x week 1,047.27$ 970.31$ Exhibit A City of Temecula Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023 City of Temecula Proposed Rates Effective July 1, 2023 5 x week 1,308.82$ 1,212.65$ 6 x week 1,570.31$ 1,454.93$ 7 x week 1,831.83$ 1,697.23$ Non-food 3-yard bin 1 x week 232.72$ 215.23$ 2 x week 464.29$ 429.41$ 3 x week 695.80$ 643.53$ 4 x week 927.35$ 857.69$ 5 x week 1,158.82$ 1,071.78$ 6 x week 1,390.37$ 1,285.93$ 7 x week 1,621.92$ 1,500.10$ Non-food 64-gallon cart 1 x week 47.91$ 44.10$ 2 x week 95.80$ 88.19$ 3 x week 143.72$ 132.30$ 4 x week 191.61$ 176.39$ 5 x week 239.53$ 220.50$ 6 x week 287.44$ 264.61$ Extra pickup 35.83$ 33.39$ Food 64-gallon cart 1 x week 64.93$ 59.97$ 2 x week 129.86$ 119.93$ 3 x week 194.77$ 179.88$ 4 x week 259.72$ 239.86$ 5 x week 324.65$ 299.83$ 6 x week 389.60$ 359.82$ Extra pickup 48.21$ 44.93$ Commercial Additonal Services: Commercial Bin Delivery Fee per container 59.40$ 54.34$ Rollff False Run Fee per incident 87.61$ 80.15$ Commercial Stinger Fee per bin, per pickup 34.52$ 31.58$ Locking Bin Fee per bin, per month 29.96$ 27.41$ E-Waste Pick up: no charge no charge “Hard to service” vehicle usage rate: no charge no charge “Hard to service” bin moving rate: no charge no charge Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate: no charge no charge Deodorizing / replacing bin rate: no charge no charge Recycle Bin Contamination 59.94$ 54.84$ Redeliver and reinstatement rate: per occurrence 26.22$ 24.01$ Temporary Services Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate: 139.59$ 128.84$ Extra Temporary or Regular Service pick up per pickup 79.78$ 72.76$ (Includes all bin sizes 2, 3 and 4 yards) Commercial and Rolloff Setup Fee Commercial and Rolloff Setup Fee 60.02$ 54.91$ Redeliver and reinstatement rate: per occurrence 46.97$ 44.04$ Roll-off Delivery Fee: per rolloff 84.70$ 79.42$ Roll-off disposal rate: 301.65$ 282.83$ Roll-off recycling rate: plus market value 301.65$ 282.83$ Roll-off compactor rate: 419.99$ 393.79$ Roll-off recycling compactor rate: plus market value 419.99$ 393.79$ MRF Fee: per ton 62.03$ 56.75$ C&D Fee: per ton 62.03$ 56.75$ Inert Disposal: per load 160.04$ 146.41$ AD Fee: per ton 100.12$ 93.31$ Item No. 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report ______________________________________________________________________________ PREPARED BY: Luisa Tovar, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file. On May 21 - 23, 2023, Mayor Pro Tem James Stewart traveled to Las Vegas, Nevada to attend the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC). On June 19 - 22, 2023, Mayor Zak Schwank traveled to Washington, DC to meet with City lobbyist (Turch & Associates) and Federal Offices. ATTACHMENTS: 1. ICSC Schedule 2. Washington DC Itinerary ICSC LAS VEGAS Schedule Sunday May 21, 2023 8:00am - 2:00pm ICSC & UNC Retail Real Estate Case Competition Wynn Hotel – Bandol 1 8:00am - 5:30pm Badge Pickup & Registration Wynn Hotel - Latour Ballroom 11:00am - 1:00pm Volunteer Leadership Appreciation Brunch with Trustees’Distinguished Service Awards Wynn Hotel – Margaux By Invitation Only 1:00pm - 2:00pm Professional Development Workshop: Dealmaking Masterclass Wynn Hotel - Lafite 5 Join this session to gain insight into what it takes to get a deal done in today’s ever-changing market. We’ll address b... 1:00pm - 2:00pm Professional Development Workshop: Location, Location, Location Wynn Hotel - Lafite 1-2 Understanding the Retailer’s Site Selection Criteria Retail site selection is as much of a science as an art form. T... 1:00pm - 2:00pm Professional Development Workshop: Psychology of Real Estate Marketing Wynn Hotel – La Tache 1-2 Join this workshop to discover the seven Principles of Psychomarketing, developed by ATYPICAL, a commercial real estate–... 1:00pm - 2:00pm Professional Development Workshop: Roadmap to Innovation Wynn Hotel - Lafite 4, 7, 9 How to Build an Integrated Tech Strategy Join this workshop to hear from technology strategists on their best practice... 1:00pm - 2:00pm Volunteer Leadership Briefing Wynn Hotel – Montrachet By Invitation Only 2:15pm - 3:15pm Professional Development Workshop: Doing More With Less Wynn Hotel – La Tache 1-2 Marketing with Limited Resources We are all under pressure to deliver bigger and better results with increasingly fewe... 2:15pm - 3:15pm Professional Development Workshop: Mixed-Use Mastery Wynn Hotel - Lafite 1-2 Developing Where We Shop, Dine, Live, Work and Play Join leaders representing varying aspects of a mixed-use developmen... 2:15pm - 3:15pm Professional Development Workshop: The Numbers Behind the Deal Wynn Hotel - Lafite 5 Drafting Your Lease to Make More Money Ideal for landlords and tenants, this workshop delivers strategies and tactics fo... 2:15pm - 3:15pm Professional Development Workshop: Utilizing Economic Development Incentives Wynn Hotel - Lafite 4, 7, 9 What economic incentives are cities using to attract retail development in their communities? How can developers, owners... 3:30pm - 4:30pm Professional Development Workshop: Investing in Retail Properties and Structuring Partnerships Wynn Hotel - Lafite 5 Raising equity from friends and family as well as from institutional investors to acquire a retail property can be chall... 3:30pm - 4:30pm Professional Development Workshop: Practical Strategies to Future-Proof Your Supplier Network Wynn Hotel - Lafite 4, 7, 9 Significant challenges and disruptions in the supply chain have amplified the importance of supplier diversity. As resou... 3:30pm - 4:30pm Professional Development Workshop: Reshaping Communities Wynn Hotel - Lafite 1-2 Innovative Strategies for a Transformative Future From urban to suburban, cities have undergone monumental changes over... 4:00pm - 5:00pm ICSC Foundation Reception: Celebrating the Talent Incubator Project Wynn Hotel – Bollinger By Invitation Only 4:45pm - 6:00pm Keynote Presentation: COACH. CHIEF. CHAMPION. Wynn Hotel - Cristal Ballroom Get inspired as Andy Reid shares his insights as one of the most successful coaches in professional sports. His legendar... 5:30pm - 8:00pm Badge Pickup & Registration Wynn Hotel - Event Pavilion & Lawn Registration Desks A & B 6:00pm - 8:00pm Opening Reception Wynn Hotel - Event Pavilion & Lawn 6:30pm - 8:00pm ICSC Global Awards Ceremony Wynn Hotel - Margaux ICSC LAS VEGAS Schedule Monday May 22, 2023 6:30am - 5:00pm Badge Pickup & Registration LVCC – Central Hall, C5 6:30am - 5:00pm Badge Pickup & Registration LVCC – Lower South Hall 6:30am - 5:00pm Information Booth LVCC - Grand Lobby 6:30am - 5:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Central Hall, C5 Lobby 6:30am - 5:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Lower South Lobby 6:30am - 5:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Upper South Connector 6:30am - 5:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Upper South Entrance 7:30am - 8:30am Advancing Retail in Communities Breakfast LVCC - N110 Calling all retailers, city officials and community advancement leaders. Don't miss your chance to hear best practices o... 7:30am - 8:30am ICSC Women’s Forum & Breakfast LVCC – N112 Hosted in partnership with CREW Network Finding Your Path to the Boardroom Board leadership roles can be instrumental... 8:00am - 5:00pm DINE. PLAY. GATHER LVCC – Lower South Hall Rear Visit the Lower South Hall of the Las Vegas Convention Center to experience how today ’s consumers dine, play, and gather... 8:00am - 5:00pm Exhibit Hall Open LVCC – Central & South Halls 8:00am - 5:00pm ICSC Volunteer Lounge LVCC – N109 9:00am - 10:00am ICSC Foundation Scholarship Recipients Breakfast LVCC - N115 By Invitation Only 10:00am - 10:30am General Session: Marketplaces Industry Insights ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby The CEO Perspective Join top executives to hear their thoughts on the industry and leadership during this unique time in... 10:45am - 11:00am Microlearning Session: Tips for Community Advancers ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Attracting National Tenants Join this session to learn how your B or C center can put its best foot forward to attract... 11:00am - 12:00pm Student Speed Networking LVCC - N116 Pre-registration is required. 11:15am - 11:45am General Session: Restaurant Runway ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Emerging Trends in Dining Join dining experts and operators to learn more about consumer behavior, technology, and conc... 11:15am - 11:45am Sponsored Session: Mall of America - Beyond Points and Rewards LVCC – Show Floor Sponsor Theater How Mall of America Built an Innovative Loyalty Membership Experience In today's highly competitive retail landscape, s... 12:30pm - 1:30pm ICSC Foundation Student Lunch - Meet the Retailers! LVCC - N115 1:15pm - 1:45pm General Session: Business Watch ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Combating Organized Retail Crime (ORC) and Theft Inventory loss in 2022 reached $94 billion, and 75.9% of retailers rep... 2:00pm - 2:30pm General Session: Vacant Box, New Opportunity ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby The Non-Traditional Tenant As leasing professionals seek inventive ways to reduce vacancies and increase NOI, more p... 2:00pm - 2:30pm Sponsored Session: Coldwell Banker LVCC – Show Floor Sponsor Theater How Coldwell Banker Uses Consumer Behavior Data to Uncover Trends The uncertain economy, shifting cultural trends and ad... 2:00pm - 3:30pm ICSC & UNC Retail Real Estate Case Competition - Finals LVCC – N117 2:45pm - 3:00pm Microlearning Session: Tips for Motivated Sellers ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Leveraging MARKETPLACES IQ Join this session to discover ICSC’s MARKETPLACES IQ, a centralized platform to search commer... 3:15pm - 3:45pm General Session: CRE Investment ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby The Future of Capital Markets Join finance experts to discuss growth opportunities and a vision for the future of capit... 3:15pm - 3:45pm Sponsored Session: Men’s Wearhouse LVCC – Show Floor Sponsor Theater Helping People Love the Way They Look and Feel for Their Most Important Moments We are Tailored Brands – Men’s Wearhouse... 4:00pm - 4:30pm General Session: Development With a Cultural Focus ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Join commercial real estate and community advancement leaders as they discuss strategies and initiatives for development... 5:00pm - 6:30pm ICSC Next Generation Leadership Network & Chairs Reception Wynn Hotel – Montrachet By Invitation Only 5:30pm - 7:00pm Diversity Reception Wynn Hotel - Margaux Join us at the Wynn – Margaux for a celebration of our members and their efforts to advance diversity, equity and inclus... 6:30pm - 7:30pm Student Reception Wynn Hotel - La Tache ICSC LAS VEGAS Schedule Tuesday May 23, 2023 7:00am - 12:00pm Badge Pickup & Registration LVCC – Lower South Hall 7:00am - 3:00pm Badge Pickup & Registration LVCC – Central Hall, C5 7:00am - 3:00pm Information Booth LVCC - Grand Lobby 7:00am - 3:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Central Hall, C5 Lobby 7:00am - 3:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Lower South Lobby 7:00am - 3:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Upper South Connector 7:00am - 3:00pm Information Booth LVCC – Upper South Entrance 8:00am - 3:00pm DINE. PLAY. GATHER LVCC – Lower South Hall Rear Visit the Lower South Hall of the Las Vegas Convention Center to experience how today ’s consumers dine, play, and gather... 8:00am - 3:00pm Exhibit Hall Open LVCC – Central & South Halls 8:00am - 3:00pm ICSC Volunteer Lounge LVCC – N109 10:00am - 10:30am General Session: Technology Transforming the Shopper Journey ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Consumer-focused and tech-enabled strategies are forever changing every touchpoint along the customer journey. Join thi... 10:45am - 11:00am Microlearning Session: Tips for Placemakers ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Activating Your Common Area and Outdoor Space Join this session to learn how placemaking and brand activations can inc... 11:15am - 11:45am General Session: Health and Wellness ICSC Brand Activation: LVCC – Grand Lobby Leading the Way to Center Vibrancy With the heightened emphasis on health and safety over the last couple of years, con... CITY OF TEMECULA SCHEDULE WASHINGTON, DC JUNE 19 – 22, 2023 TUESDAY, JUNE 20 10:00 am Elisabeth (Morgan) Fondriest Chief, Recreation Grant Programs Branch State and Local Assistance Division, National Park Service National Park Service Department of Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 202-354-6916 elisabeth_fondriest@nps.gov Issue: Explore how best to access park funding through the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) which is administered as pass through funding to States.  Construct Modular Outdoor Skate Park on approximate 0.58 acre vacant parcel owned by City of Temecula, located adjacent to Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County property at 28790 Pujol Street (southeast corner of Pujol Street and First Street in Temecula, CA). Project includes: grading, asphalt paving, fencing, lighting and construction of ramps, platforms, decks, safety rails and rail features for use as outdoor skate park. Project includes parking for approximately 30 cars and modular skate park features to accommodate approximately skaters of all age ranges and ability levels. This location is strategically selected as it is surrounded by many diverse multi-family housing options and will provide needed recreational amenities within walking distance to benefit the youth in this area of Temecula which includes multiple Affordable Housing projects sponsored by the City of Temecula.  Construct a regional sports park on property owned by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Site is location of planned flood control detention basin for federally authorized Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project. Project includes grading, installation of irrigation, turf grass, lighting, access road, 500 parking spaces and 18 full size multi-use soccer fields, with fitness loop trail around perimeter. The City of Temecula Community Services Master Plan (CSMP), completed in 2020, identified a critical lack of park space in the project location, and lack of sports fields throughout the City. These additional sports fields will offer opportunities to develop and deliver new and innovative outdoor programming including programs for senior citizens, veterans groups, and individuals with special needs. Also, the City of Temecula is in the southwestern most region of Riverside County and significant distance from other regional sports parks. This park will provide valuable outdoor recreation opportunities for Temecula residents as well as other surrounding cities that also lack sports fields, many of which are economically disadvantaged. 12:00 pm Director Hugh T. Clements, Jr. Shannon Long, Deputy Director Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) US Department of Justice Two Constitution Square | 145 N Street, NE | Washington, DC 20530 POC: Andres Lopez, Assistant to the Director, Management Analyst III 202-288-4182 or 202-514-2064 Issue: Explore how a contract city can access grant funding for New Hire Program/School Resource Officers; School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) and Law Enforcement Mental Health and Wellness Act Program 2:00 pm Representative Ken Calvert Jack Lincoln, Legislative Director 2205 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202-225-1986 Issue: Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project 3:00 pm Sam Mahood, Transportation LA Andrew Baratta, Transportation Staffer Sarah Swig, Environmental Legislative Assistant Office of Senator Alex Padilla 112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 202-224-3553 Issue: 1) I-15 project and other transportation priorities; and 2) Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Western Riverside National Wildlife Refuge Act (S.4669/117th Congress) and Rep. Ken Calvert’s Wildlife Refuge Conservation and Recreation for the Community Act (H.R. 972/117th Congress) and efforts to protect Temecula Wine Country; 3:45 pm Alexis Segal, Environmental Legislative Assistant Freda Pachter, Transportation Legislative Assistant Office of Senator Dianne Feinstein 331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 202-224-3841 Issues: 1) Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Western Riverside National Wildlife Refuge Act (S.4669/117th Congress) and Rep. Ken Calvert’s Wildlife Refuge Conservation and Recreation for the Community Act (H.R. 972/117th Congress) and efforts to protect Temecula Wine Country; and 2) transportation priorities. WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21 9:30 am Susan Lucas, SAD/SPD RIT Deputy US Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street NW, Conf. Room 3K86 Washington, DC 20548 Susan Lucas 904-860-2211 Veronica Botts Bell, Administrative Support Assistant 202-761-4814 Veronica.bottsBell@usace.army.mil Issue: Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project 11:00 am Eleanor Billington, Civic Partnerships Manager National Endowment for the Arts 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20506 202-682-5728 Issue: Our Town is our creative placemaking grants program, using arts, culture, and design to strengthen communities and advance local priorities such as health, community development, environment/climate, and public safety, among other community issues and aspirations. 12:00 pm Representative Darrell Issa Jennifer Haynes, Legislative Director 2108 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 202-225-5672 Issues: City priorities and Murrieta Creek Flood Control Project 2:00 pm Charles Small, Deputy Assistant Secretary Intergovernmental Affairs - Office of the Secretary Heather Dean, FHWA Congressional Affairs Team US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Conference Room W85-310 Washington, DC 202-924-4011 POC: Landon Bailey Special Assistant for Governmental Affairs Email: landon.bailey@dot.gov 202-924-4270 Cell Heather.deane@dot.gov 202-366-2218 POC: Elena.Joa@dot.gov 202-366-2218 Issue: DOT INFRA, RAISE and Safe Streets and All Roads Grant Programs THURSDAY, JUNE 22 7:15 am Return flight back to California Item No. 18 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report ___________________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of May 2023. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed forty (40) new applications and conducted five (5) Public Hearings in May 2023. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. The project has been scheduled for Planning Commission on July 19, 2023. (COOPER) Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 130,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 14,000 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecul a Parkway. A public scoping meeting for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was held on March 23, 2022, at the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library. The public review period for the SEIR has ended. The Final SEIR has been completed by the consultant and meetings have taken place with the City Council and Planning Commission Subcommittee’s. A tour of a similar Behavioral Health Facility has been scheduled for June 6, 2023 for the City Council and Planning Commission. (COOPER) Temecula Resort and Spa (PAs 22-0035, 22-0037): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90 -foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street. The project was presented to the Old Town Steering Subcommittee on July 26, 2022, September 27, 2022, April 25, 2023, and May 23, 2023, and the Old Town Temecula Planning Commission Subcommittee on October 19, 2022. (COOPER) Seraphina Tentative Tract Map No. 38267 (PA22-0830): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38267) for the creation of 39 single family lots and two (2) open space lots on 12.77 acres located on the southwest corner of Joseph Road and Rita Way (APN: 957-080-027). (COOPER) Boutique Luxury Hotel (PAs 22-0929, 0930, 0931): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 54,699 square foot, four-story, 45 room hotel that includes retail spaces, a gym, meeting space, and a rooftop restaurant and pool area. The project is located on the west side of Old Town Front Street approximately 400’ south of Santiago Road adjacent to the U -Haul dealership. The application package also includes requests for a Minor Exception for the height of the building to accommodate architectural tower elements and a Variance to allow for parking within the setback due to the narrow width of the project site. (COOPER) Parker Medical Center II (PA22-0987): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 35,601 square-foot, three story, medical office building loc ated on the west side of Avenida De Missiones approximately 425 feet south of Temecula Parkway. (COOPER) Rally’s Burgers (PA22-1012): The City is processing a Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1572) for an approximately 998 square foot drive thru restaurant located on the southwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Mahlon Vail Road. (COOPER) Paradise Chevrolet (PAs 22-1124, 1125): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 47,727 square foot, two story structure that includes rooftop parking for a commercial and fleet truck dealership that includes maintenance and repair services for Paradise Chevrolet. The project is located on an undeveloped site at 42105 DLR Drive. An environmental consultant has been selected and is under contract to prepare an environmental document for the project. (COOPER) FORE Temecula (PA23-0057): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 213-unit apartment community built on 6.6 acres located at 27468 Ynez Road in the Temecula Town Center Shopping Center. The project is taking advantage of a mixed-use overlay within the City of Temecula General Plan. The project applicant met with the City Council General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee on March 14, 2023. (COOPER) U-HAUL (PA23-0056): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 40,883 square foot four story self-storage facility located on the southwest corner of Las Haciendas Street and Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER) Firenze Appeal (PA23-0045): The City is processing an Appeal to the approved Firenze Development Plan (PA21-1023). The project was originally approved on January 20, 2023 (APN: 921-060-058). (COOPER) Rancho-12 Tentative Tract Map (PA22-0047): A Tentative Tract Map for a 12-lot single-family development located at 31670 Rancho California Road. (JONES) Starbucks Ynez Road Modification (PA22-0722): A Major Modification application to allow revisions to an existing commercial site. Revisions will include façade and site improvements. The project is located at 27425 Ynez Road. (JONES) White Barn Development Plan (PA22-0874): A Development Plan Application for a proposed 9,100 square-foot daycare facility on the vacant 2.46-acre parcel located at 39970 Cantrell Road. (JONES) Be Good Hotel (PA22-0995): A Development Plan Application to review a four-story hotel featuring nine rooms, restaurant and subterranean parking. The project is generally located on the northwest corner of Fourth Street and Mercedes Street. (JONES) Amazon Delivery Van Parking Lot (PA22-1025): A modification application to allow a parking lot expansion to accommodate delivery van parking. The project is located at 27731 Diaz Road. (JONES) Better Buzz/Ono BBQ Development Plan (PA23-0030): A Development Plan to allow the construction of two commercial structures totaling approximately 4,414 square feet. Structures will be used for a restaurant and coffee shop. The project is located at 29540 Rancho California Road. (JONES) Old Town Townhomes Development Plan (PA22-0941): the City is processing a Development Plan Application for the construction of 14 multifamily residential units on the vacant .68-acre parcel located at 42146 Sixth Street. (CARDENAS) LONG RANGE PLANNING General Plan Update: The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four-phase, multi-year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City’s GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City’s Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City’s remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18 to 24-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update: On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City’s six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City’s Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City’s Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. The last BRC meeting was held on July 21, 2022. The Preliminary Draft document was presented to all the Commissions in October and November. The Final Draft QLMP was approved by the City Council on November 15, 2022. The QLMP will serve as the foundation for the General plan update. The final document is available online and hard copies have been distributed to the City Council, City Staff, Boards, and Commissions. (PETERS) QLMP Website for Measuring Progress (Dashboard): As part of the Quality of Life Master Plan Update, Planning staff is working with a consultant, MIG, and the IT Department to develop a website for the QLMP. The intent of the website is to provide a “dashboard” to display the seven Core Values and eventually incorporate the goals and policies of the updated General Plan. The website will also be used to measure the city’s progress towards achieving the Citizen’s 20-Year Priorities identified in the QLMP. The dashboard will be displayed on a third-party website and will incorporate links and useful indicators intended for user- friendly navigation. MIG is currently working on creating the digital assets needed for the development of the website. (GARCIA) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment (LR19-1458): An amendment to the Uptown Specific Plan to implement the following changes: modify graphics to reflect consistency with text regarding allowable frontage types, amend street cross sections (graphics), amend plant pallet and silva cell requirements for street trees, implement a street naming convention, amend streetlight spacing and other typographical errors. Staff has reached out to Spurlock Consulting for assistance in updating the Sidewalk and Streetscape Standards and is awaiting a scope of work and timeline. Public Works is drafting new street sections for the Specific Plan. Spurlock Consulting has provided a scope of work for the proposed changes to the streetscape and sidewalk standards and staff has executed the agreement for services and will begin updating the graphics as requested. Planning and Traffic Engineering have been working on updated street cross sections and a map to identify cross section placements. (COLLINS) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has retained Fehr & Peers (F&P) Transportation Consultants to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for the California Environmental Quality Act evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS) Old Town Parklets (LR22-1112): The previous Old Town Outdoor Dining Program was a project intended to make the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail Program (TED) permanent that was sparked by the COVID- 19 pandemic restrictions. However, due to the potential barriers that came to light such as loss of parking, ADA requirements, outside agency fees and more, the decision was made by City Council and staff to end the outdoor dining program when the license agreements expired on July 1, 2022. With that, other outdoor dining amenities were explored for Old Town which led to the Old Town Parklet Project. Parklets are the conversion of parking spaces on urban streets into a small public ‘park’ or enclosed seating area. The intent of the Parklet Project is to provide an additional amenity to the community and promote an increase in pedestrian activity and convenience. Staff is working with a consultant, Placeworks, to design and implement the Old Town Parklets. Locations and design themes will be determined throughout the process. Due to the project change, a new contract is currently being drafted with an updated scope and fees from Placeworks. This will include a reduction in the contract amount and term extension. Staff is currently working with the consultant on scheduling a public workshop in July at the Civic Center Conference Center. (GARCIA) Complete Streets (LR23-0043): This project will draft a citywide policy for the city to ensure transportation infrastructure is designed to enhance safety, accessibility, and mobility for all users. A Complete Streets Checklist will be developed to be used internally to ensure that transportation infrastructure projects are implementing Complete Streets where practical by considering the feasibility of Complete Streets improvements and ensuring consistency with other planning documents. The City has retained Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants to draft the Complete Streets Policy, implementation checklist, and mid-block crosswalk criteria. This project is being funded by the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant that was awarded by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). The Agreement with Fehr & Peers was approved by City Council on April 25, 2023. (GARCIA) Climate Action Plan (CAP) Baseline Evaluation (LR23-0083): The City was awarded funds from the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant opportunity by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal report of the city’s baseline Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) inventory. The intent is for the City to have full documentation of a baseline emissions inventory that c an be used as the City develops a Climate Action Plan. The City has hired WSP to collect data needed to estimate GHG emissions and include vehicle fuel economy standards, electric vehicle mandates, renewable electricity standards, waste reduction targets, and water use restrictions. The project kickoff meeting with city staff is scheduled for June 13, 2023. (GARCIA) Wayfinding Guide (LR23-0167): The city is working with a consultant, Alta Planning + Design, Inc., to implement a bicycle wayfinding system for the bike lanes and trails throughout the city. Alta will draft a wayfinding strategy memo that outlines best practices for destination selection, sign placement, and sign programming. The Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan that was adopted in 2016 will act as an implementation and style guide to create an interconnected network designed to encourage more residents to use active transportation. The contract with Alta is in the works and the project kickoff is anticipated for the end of June. (GARCIA) Land Use Economic Opportunity Study (LR23-0078): In preparation for the General Plan Update staff has engaged Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) to complete a new Land Use Economic Opportunity Study. Staff is presently working on the agreement, funded through a LEAP Grant and services will commence once executed. The kickoff meeting was held on May 25 between KMA and City Staff. (COLLINS) Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan (LR21-1331): Temecula applied for and was awarded a $300,000 grant to develop Temecula’s first Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). The grant has a $78,000 match (staff time), the remainder is to onboard a consultant to draft the plan. R FP has closed and SWCA Environmental was selected as the winning candidate. The contract was approved at the January 10th City Council Meeting and a kickoff is scheduled for February 6th in the conference center. The kickoff meeting was held with 18 in attendance, the Development Team has been assigned and consultant is planning for fieldwork in the coming weeks. Fieldwork was performed on March 28th and associated studies will be provided in due time. Consultant continues fieldwork and fire modeling with maps to be presented early this summer. (COLLINS) WRCOG REAP Agreement (LR22-0664): An agreement between WRCOG and the City to provide consultation services to provide analysis of required municipal code updates as they relate to the new slate of housing laws, such as SB-9, ADU Laws, etc. Additionally, would evaluate changes to the municipal code required after the adoption of the 6th Cycle Housing Element. The cost is included as a benefit to member agencies of WRCOG. WSP is the consultant selected by WRCOG to assist the city review its Municipal Code in relation to the new housing bills passed. Staff has bi-weekly meetings with the consultant to address the changes and will discuss proposed changes at a future date in consultation with the City Attorney’s Office. Staff has received the draft analysis and will be reaching out for policy direction. Staff approached the consultant to include recently approved legislation in their analysis, and was unwilling. For this reason, staff with the assistance of the City Attorney's office will draft the Ordinance and the consultant has been released from the agreement through WRCOG. Staff continues to work with the City Attorney’s Office on drafting the Ordinance. (COLLINS) Old Town Parking Management White Paper (LR22-0857): The project will allow for the creation of a white paper discussing various technology solutions designed to track and report on parking in Old Town in real time. The project encompasses the entire Old Town Specific Plan area. Staff has retained Fehr & Peers to create the document and recommend technology for monitoring parking in real time. (JONES) Quality of Life Ordinance (LR23-0050): An Ordinance to address some concerns in 4 key areas that Staff has public safety concerns, 1) Massage Businesses attempting to circumvent the exemptions provided for in the Municipal Code and address some operational concerns raise by RSO, 2) Tobacco or “Smoke” Shops increasing number within the City and the process of licensing such establishments, 3) Smoking along public sidewalks with a focus on Old Town and the impacts to the walkable family feel the City and business owners have worked so hard to create, and 4) The growing avail ability of Kratom. Staff met with the City Council Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee (JA/BK) on 4/25 to discuss the proposed scope of the ordinance and to obtain Councilmembers feedback and direction on the proposed ordinance. The Draft Ordinance will be presented to Planning Commission Municipal Code Maintenance Subcommittee on June 7th and City Council Public Safety Ad Hoc Subcommittee on June 13th with PC and CC Hearings to follow. (COLLINS) Annual Title 17 Cleanup (LR23-0180): An annual effort of Community Development to identify areas of the code that need clarification, correction or an update. This is also performed to implement various components of state law. Staff has begun compiling the proposed changes and an ordinance w ill be drafted shortly thereafter. (COLLINS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City has approved the construction of a 77-unit affordable multi-family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck-under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. Community HousingWorks (CHW), the developer, has closed their interest list to the public, the lottery has taken place, and the property management company ConAm Management is working on getting future tenants approved before the move in date. The project is currently under construction in Uptown Jefferson. (URIAS) Old Town Temecula Town Homes: The City is reviewing a Development Plan application for the construction of 14 multi-family residential units on the vacant .68-acre parcel located at 42146 Sixth Street. (CARDENAS) Habitat (6) Homes Affordable Project: The City has approved and executed the Disposition and Development agreement for the construction of six (6) homes that will be available for purchase to families that qualify under low income or very low-income homebuyer income qualifications. The developer is Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley, Inc., a California nonprofit developer, the City is working with the developer to get escrow opened in the upcoming weeks. (URIAS) Request For Proposal (RFP) of the Jefferson Ave/Uptown Vacant Parcel: The City is working on starting the process to RFP the vacant parcel located in Uptown on Jefferson Avenue to the South of the French Valley Interchange exit. This parcel has an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone and The City plans to build affordable housing on this parcel. (URIAS) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for May 2023 are highlighted in the following table. Non-Construction Certificate of Occupancy  Planet Fitness (17,554 SF)  Temecula Montessori Academy (7,900 SF)  Temecula Children’s Music Foundation (3,800 SF) Tenant Improvement  412 Church Murrieta (28,378 SF)  Shogun Remodel (1,300 sq ft)  Robeks Fresh Juice & Smoothies (961 SF) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of May, Code Enforcement responded to 114 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 169 code cases, conducted 374 regular inspections and forwarded 39 referrals. Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Status Owner Plan Type PA23 -0185 Yannin Marquez 05/01/2023 05/11/2023 Approved Moises Villegas 954-040-007 Suzanne Chesser PL Modifications 30975 Corte De Los Santos Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Chesser Residence Addition MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for a 90 square foot bathroom addition, removal of a window and addition of a new double door to the rear of an existing home located at 30975 Corte De Los Santos. PA23 -0188 Yannin Marquez 05/02/2023 Out Jason Sigler 945-160-015 Theodore K Lin PL Accessory Dwelling Unit 43938 Calle De Velardo , 2 Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Lin Residence ADU: an Accessory Dwelling Unit application for a detached 891 square foot accessory dwelling unit with carport and covered porches located at 43938 Calle De Velardo. PA23 -0190 Jaime Cardenas 05/02/2023 Plan Review Tom Johnson 959-070-024 Temecula Storage 18 CA LP PL Wireless Antenna Facility 31524 Rancho Pueblo Rd Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Verizon Redhawk Relo WTF MOD: a Wireless Facilities Application (Planning Review Only) for the addition of new antennas and remote radio units on the existing wireless communication site located at 31524 Rancho Pueblo Road. PA23 -0191 Jaime Cardenas 05/02/2023 05/16/2023 Completed Allie Herring 921-030-043 DIAZ RE HOLDINGS PL Zoning or Planning Letter 27635 Diaz Rd Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: 27635 Diaz Road ZL: a Zoning Verification letter for the property located at 27635 Diaz Road. PA23 -0192 Jaime Cardenas 05/03/2023 05/31/2023 Approved Sonny Mascarenas 962-381-006 Jeffrey Young PL Minor Exception 46422 Kohinoor Way Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Young Residence Pool Setback ME: A Minor Exception Application for the allowance of a 15% pool setback reduction from 5' to 4'-3" at the rear of the existing residence located at 46422 Kohinoor Way. PA23 -0195 Yannin Marquez 05/04/2023 Plan Review Magyar Mark A Trust DTD 8/24/11 944-252-022 Magyar Mark A Trust DTD 8/24/11 PL Modifications 42029 Cosmic Dr Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Magyar Residence Addition MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for an addition of 325 square foot at the rear of the residence located at 42029 Cosmic Drive. Page 1 of 5 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Status Owner Plan Type PA23 -0197 Eric Jones 05/04/2023 Out Brandon Humann 922-210-042 Catalyst Commercial Group, LLC PL Development Plan Temecula, CA Case Title / Description: Bedford Court DP: A Development Plan application to allow for the construction of two structures totaling approximately 4,546 square feet. Anticipated uses consist of a car wash and coffee shop. The project is generally located approximately 160 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection. PA23 -0198 Eric Jones 05/05/2023 Out Brandon Humann 922-210-042 Catalyst Commercial Group, LLC PL Conditional Use Permit Temecula, CA Case Title / Description: Bedford Court Drive-Thru and Car Wash CUP: A Conditional Use Permit to allow a car wash and restaurant Drive-Thru. The project is located approximately 160 feet from the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection. PA23 -0199 05/08/2023 Plan Review Marvin Jones 962-300-026 William Henderson PL Modifications 45346 Willowick St Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Jones Residential Garage MOD: a Modification Application to convert a single-car garage into a bedroom at the property located at 45346 Willowick Street. PA23 -0200 Jaime Cardenas 05/08/2023 Plan Review Dawn Carrington 916-400-054 Hoehn Enterprise 4 Temecula PL Zoning or Planning Letter 40955 Temecula Center Dr Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Audi Temecula ZL: a Zoning Verification Letter for the property located at 40955 Temecula Center. PA23 -0201 Yannin Marquez 05/09/2023 05/24/2023 Approved 922-024-003 Smith Family Trust PL Temporary Use Permit 41950 6Th St Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Wild Gypsea Boutique Grand Opening TUP: A Major Temporary Use Permit for a grand opening event for a new boutique with additional vendors and live music on Saturday, May 27, 2023, between the hours of 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. PA23 -0202 Yannin Marquez 05/09/2023 Plan Review Shane Takahashi 909-372-035 Zevo Park Industrial PL Modifications 42025 Zevo Dr Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: 60 Grit Studios Solar MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for roof-mounted solar panels on the existing warehouse located at 42025 Zevo Drive. PA23 -0203 Scott Cooper 05/09/2023 05/24/2023 Approved Nina Raey 910-320-035 Souplantation (dba) PL Modifications 26420 Ynez Rd Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Benihana Elevations MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for exterior color changes to a previously building (PA22-0458) located at 26420 Ynez Road. Page 2 of 5 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Status Owner Plan Type PA23 -0204 Eric Jones 05/10/2023 Plan Review Brandon Humann 922-210-042 Catalyst Commercial Group, LLC PL Maps Temecula, CA Case Title / Description: Bedford Court TPM: A Tentative Parcel Map to create two lots from one. The project is located approximately 150 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection (APN: 922-210-042). PA23 -0205 Yannin Marquez 05/10/2023 05/26/2023 Approved Casey Shaw 910-420-030 Temecula Towne Center Assoc PL Temporary Use Permit 40820 Winchester Rd Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Temecula Chamber of Commerce Electronic Waste Recycling Event TUP: a Temporary Use Permit Application for an electronic waste recycling event taking place at the parking lot adjacent to Ring Road and west of the Promenade Mall on June 3-4, August 12-13, and November 11-12 between the hours of 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. PA23 -0206 Yannin Marquez 05/11/2023 Out Kim Gerrish 910-420-030 Temecula Towne Center Assoc PL Temporary Use Permit 40820 Winchester Rd Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Michelle's Place Walk of Hope 2023 TUP: A Temporary Use Permit for Michelle's Place annual Walk of Hope taking place on October 22, 2023, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. located on Ring Road near the Promenade Mall at 40820 Winchester Road. PA23 -0207 Scott Cooper 05/12/2023 05/17/2023 Approved Mario Calvillo 909-290-048 MS-Mountain View, LLC PL Modifications 27562 Via Industria Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Bldg 15 MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA22-1034) to redesign the ADA path of travel to the ROW located at 27562 Via Industria. PA23 -0208 05/15/2023 Plan Review Gabriela Marks 910-310-016 M & J RAMSAY CORP PL Modifications 27410 Jefferson Ave Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Jack in the Box MOD: a Modification Application for Jack in the box to expand their drive-through from one (1) to (two) 2 lanes and to update the facade of the building located at 27410 Jefferson Avenue. PA23 -0209 Yannin Marquez 05/16/2023 Plan Review Karen Sanchez 909-290-071 MS-MOUNTAIN VIEW PL Modifications 42624 Avenida Alvarado Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Tri State General Contractors MOD: A Modification Application (Planning Review Only) to install a new roof mounted solar system consisting of 338 modules located at 42624 Avenida Alvarado. Page 3 of 5 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Status Owner Plan Type PA23 -0210 Eric Jones 05/18/2023 06/05/2023 Approved Neil Cleveland 922-073-026 First & Front PL Modifications 28721 Old Town Front St Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Temecula Stampede MOD: A Modification application to allow a roof revision to an existing commercial building located at 28721 Old Town Front Street. PA23 -0211 Eric Jones 05/19/2023 Cancelled Brandon Humann 922-210-042 Catalyst Commercial Group, LLC PL Maps Temecula, CA Case Title / Description: Bedford Court TPM: A Tentative Parcel Map to create two parcels from one for commercial uses. The project is generally located approximately 170 feet south of the Temecula Parkway and Bedford Court intersection (APN 922-210-042). PA23 -0214 Jaime Cardenas 05/23/2023 Cancelled Lynn Kelly-Lehner 921-281-018 Kornland Building PL Temporary Use Permit 28410 Vincent Moraga Dr Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Habitat for Humanity TUP: a Temporary Use Permit (Non-Profit) for Habitat for Humanity to host vendors that provide home-buyer related services on June 17, 2023 at 28410 Vincent Moraga Drive. PA23 -0215 Yannin Marquez 05/24/2023 Plan Review Sam Visnic 922-120-012 PL Massage Permits 28936 Old Town Front St Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Visnic Center for Integrated Health Inc. DBA Release Muscle Therapy MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit (Change of location) for Visnic Center for Integrated Health Inc. Release Muscle Therapy located at 28936 Old Town Front Steet, Suite 106. PA23 -0216 Jaime Cardenas 05/23/2023 Plan Review Michele Richmond 959-080-017 Jacksons Food Stores PL Sign Program 44239 Margarita Rd Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Jackson's Car Wash Sign Program: a Sign Program Application for an existing car wash and gas station located at 44239 Margarita Road. PA23 -0217 Scott Cooper 05/24/2023 05/25/2023 Approved Dena Upp 964-740-004 Escrow Acct 5074 Authorized User Shawood Communities PL Modifications 32363 Daybrook Terrace Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA20B PPP MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to modify the previously approved Product Placement Plan to change the building plotting on Lot 4 from 1CR to 1C within Planning Area 20B of Sommers Bend PA23 -0219 Yannin Marquez 05/25/2023 Plan Review Steve Kowalski 945-251-002 Steve Kowalski PL Modifications 30129 Calle Halcon Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Kowalski Deck and Patio MOD: a Modification Application for a new 192 square foot deck to the second-floor master bedroom and covered patio at the first floor and replacement of two windows to French doors located at 30129 Calle Halcon. Page 4 of 5 PA Number Project Address APN Assigned Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Status Owner Plan Type PA23 -0223 Yannin Marquez 05/25/2023 Plan Review Pablo Wolf 940-310-033 AEP Charter Inspire AEP Charter Inspire PL Modifications 43517 Ridge Park Dr , 100 Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Axos Imaging Temecula MOD: a Modification Application (Planning Review Only) for roof alterations to accommodate a new elevator located at 43517 Ridge Park Drive, Suite 100. PREAPP23-0 189 Jaime Cardenas 05/02/2023 06/01/2023 Completed Lianne Holgate 959-090-015 Redhawk Prop PL Pre-Application 44054 Margarita Rd Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Sprouts Montessori Daycare PreApp: a Pre-application for a proposed childcare facility with exterior modifications at 44054 Margarita Road, Suite 1. PREAPP23-0 213 Jaime Cardenas 05/23/2023 Corrections Carl Chrisman 921-680-003 Diego of Temecula PL Pre-Application 41902 Motor Car Pky Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Toyota Service Center PreApp: a Pre-application for a proposed service canopy and service waiting area and expansion of driveway access at the existing Toyota Service building located at 41902 Motor Car Parkway. Page 5 of 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Christ Durham, Captain DATE: July 11, 2023 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (May 2023) PREPARED BY: Chris Mattson, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file monthly report for May 2023. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for May 2023. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service.................................................................................................6,702 "Priority One" calls for service......................................................................................................63 Average response time for "Priority One" calls.........................................................................6.62 VOLUNTEERS Chaplain.........................................................................................................................................35 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours..................................................................................568.30 Reserve officer hours (patrol)........................................................................................................18 Explorer..........................................................................................................................................77 Station/Administration ...................................................................................................................16 Total Volunteer hours.............................................................................................................714.30 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served.....................................................................................756 Fingerprints/Live Scan.....................................................................................135 Policereports filed..............................................................................................3 Citationssigned off..........................................................................................14 Totalreceipts...........................................................................................................................$4,552 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings...........................................................................0 Safety presentations/Training................................................................................0 Specialevents...................................................................................................................................4 Residential/Business security surveys conducted............................................................................0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up.................................................................0 StationTours....................................................................................................................................0 Planning Review Projects.......................................................................................6 Temp Outdoor Use Permits....................................................................................7 SPECIAL TEAMS (CORE) ReportsWritten...............................................................................................4 1 Onsight felony arrests.....................................................................................................................3 On sight misdemeanor arrests................................................................................7 Felony arrest warrants served.................................................................................I Misdemeanor arrest warrants served.............................................................................................22 AreaChecks...................................................................................................116 CampChecks................................................................................................................................15 PedestrianChecks.....................................................................................................38 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks..................................................................................................... 4/4 Outreach attempts / Success........................................................................................................ 1/3 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team) On sight, felony arrests.......................................................................................6 Onsight, misdemeanor arrests.......................................................................................................12 Felony arrest warrants served.......................................................................................................... I Misdemeanor arrest warrants served.............................................................................................32 Bar/Business checks......................................................................................................................30 D.U.I. Arrests..................................................................................................................................9 Traffic/Parking citations.............................................................................................................284 FirearmsSeized................................................................................................1 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team) Onsight felony arrests......................................................................................................................9 On sight misdemeanor arrests...........................................................................................................6 Felony arrest warrants served...........................................................................................................5 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served..............................................................................................24 Follow-up investigations/search warrants....................................................................5 Parole/Probation Searches...............................................................................................................3 PedestrianChecks...................................................................................................8 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks.....................................................................................................17/6 Marijuana Dispensary Checks.........................................................................................................0 ROBBERY/BURGLARY SUPPRESSION TEAM BeginningCaseload.......................................................................................................................51 TotalCases Assigned....................................................................................................................25 TotalCases Closed........................................................................................................................15 Search Warrants prepared/served.................................................................................................12 Arrests............................................................................................................................................13 Outof Custody Filings............................................................................................ I TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations..................................................................................1406 Non -hazardous citations...............................................................................................................167 Parkingcitations...........................................................................................................................175 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations.........................................................50 Seatbelts.........................................................................................................................................25 CellPhone Cites...........................................................................................................................264 Injurycollisions.............................................................................................................................38 D.U.I. Arrests.................................................................................................................................30 Grant -funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints/saturation enforcement ........................................ I Grant -funded traffic click it or ticket/traffic enforcement..............................................................4 INVESTIGATIONS BeginningCaseload.......................................................................................................................79 TotalCases Assigned....................................................................................................................54 TotalCases Closed........................................................................................................................52 Search Warrants prepared/served.................................................................................................31 Arrests..............................................................................................................................................2 Outof Custody Filings............................................................................................8 Sex Offenders Processed....................................................................................18 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Callsfor service...........................................................................................................................122 Felonyarrest/filings.........................................................................................................................3 Misdemeanor arrest/filings............................................................................................................10 TrafficCitations................................................................................................6 Total customers served................................................................................................................944 Fingerprints/Live Scans...............................................................................................................269 Totalreceipts...........................................................................................$10,746 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felonyarrest.....................................................................................................................................3 Misdemeanor arrests......................................................................................................................12 Reports...........................................................................................................................................41 Citations.........................................................................................................................................49 Meetings/Presentations................................................................................................................199 REQUESTS TO SPEAK REQUEST TO SPEAK N k, ' CITY OF TEMECULA l y7i'1 Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: KA J2`J Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Re-o,�As <zkm N6 +V)e- Gn Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: ct' Q.y A• t' 'e-K Phone Number: Address: Email address: ( If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK` CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: ` Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item. ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speakers called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name Vv for the recor t , ,� I /(500 Lt5 address: t', you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: `�.__jr(,( eC-U L c� Vct Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: it 'Au J, Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. It IMWAIWIIAWNE'� i Phone Number Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: l ` I I 23 Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ N.A- -t--VL,( Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk RLiiqr to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: _ 2_n�/4 6, /'L T > Phone Number: Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: 2 _-7/ Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record./1 Name: 11_'2 0 �b 06_'L e / f Phone Number Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Al . A REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA +W j ^ 1989 Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Ix Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk REi2f to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name , I )1'1 �")� ` 1 (fr 1 ,1� Phone Number. Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name'�� Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK All CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: (/ Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: ❑ Future Agenda Item: ❑ Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Phone Number: Address. Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAKr� CITY OF TEMECULA tvsv Date: —LC `� La 3 Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: El Future Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. yC-! c4 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. p Name: (� ' lJ rc Phone Number: Address: ` `� �.L1-/ Email address-.'--? If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. CITY COUNCIL — PUBLIC HEARING JULY 11, 2023 Item #16 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution to Approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2023-24 WRITTEN PROTESTS 5TH & MERCEDES LLC 41911 FIFTH STREET, SUITE 300 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 TELEPHONE (951) 699-6600 FACSIMILE (951) 699-6616 June 5, 2023 RECEIVED JUN 0 8, 2023 CITY GL'4f KS OW, Written Protest of Proposed Increase of Temecula Solid Waste and Recycling Rates TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF TEMECULA The undersigned protests, as follows: 1. Identi , of Properly. APN 922-024-014 2. Identity of Owner. 5th & Mercedes, LLC 3. Opposition to Increase. The proposed increase exceeds the cost of living, and although negotiated, the City of Temecula should put the contract out for competitive bids. 4. Signature of Owner: 5th & Mercedes LLC By: LL # a��d H. Lieberg, A Managing Mem er �1 VailRanch SELF STORAGE & POSTAL CENTER May 31, 2023 City of Temecula City Clerk 41000 Main Street Temecula, Ca 92590 RE: Public Hearing July 11, 2023 To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my objection to the proposed monthly fee hike by CR&R. As the owner of Vail Ranch Self Storage situated at 43980 Mahlon Vail Road, Temecula, 92592, I am compelled to voice my concerns regarding the subpar service we have received from CR&R and the exorbitant charges we are currently subjected to. Regrettably, our waste and recycling collection route has been consistently neglected, with CR&R displaying a complete lack of accountability in rescheduling missed pickups or providing credit to the account for the missed collections. In January 2021, Vail Ranch reported a damaged recycle dumpster, and despite assurances of a new bin delivery on January 29, 2021, we are yet to receive a replacement, even after persistently contacting CR&R on a weekly basis for a year and a half. Given the deplorable quality of service we have endured, it is unjustifiable to endorse CR&R's proposed rate increase. Their substandard performance and monopolistic hold on the contract do not warrant any form of reward. It is important that alternative options be explored to secure the services of a more competent waste and recycling company capable of meeting the demands of our city. Yours sincere, Gene DiLuigi Vail Ranch Self Storage 43980 Mahlon Vail Road Temecula, California 92592 Ph. (951) 302.0204 Fax (951) 302-0216 www.vailranchselfstorage.com r ` RECEIVED JUN 2 2 20 TEMECULA BRAND INVESTMENTS �.ii Y wiRKS DEPT. FOR BILL ALDEN SHOOTERS SPORTS BAR & GRILL DBA: SHOOTERS 28950 OLD TOWN FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92590 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I WOULD LIKE TO OBJECT TO THE INCREASE THAT IS BEING HEARD ON JULY 11, 2023. TEMECULA WASTE CHARGES ARE ALREADY ONE OF THE HIGHEST IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY. OVER A YEAR AGO THEY TOLD US WE NEED A RECYCLING ROLL OF BOX THAT WE STILL HAVE NOT RECEIVED YET. TEMECULA BRAND INVESTMENTS, C. OWNER MELODY ALDEN