The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About05152024 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 15, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chair Bob Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images maybe displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to 6:00 p.m. and submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the action minutes of April 17, 2024 Attachments: Minutes Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda May 15, 2024 BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images maybe displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 2. General Plan Consistency Review of the Proposed Draft Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets (Long Range Project No. LR24-0141), Katie Garcia Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED DRAFT FISCAL YEARS 2025-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET SHEETS AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4), 15061(B)(3), AND 15262 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR24-0141) Attachments: Agenda Report PC Resolution Draft FY2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda May 15, 2024 3. Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding_ garden; and PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023). Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0035, DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 288,269 SQUARE FOOT, 355 ROOM, SEVEN (7) STORY, 91-FOOT, FULL SERVICE HOTEL THAT INCLUDES AN APPROXIMATELY 174,382 SQUARE FOOT PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0037, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM 38349) TO COMBINE TEN EXISTING LOTS INTO A SINGLE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Attachments: Agenda Report Aerial Map PC Resolution - Development Plan Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Development Plan Exhibit B - Plan Reductions - Development Plan PC Resolution - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit B - Plan Reductions - Tentative Parcel Map Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda May 15, 2024 COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, June 5, 2024, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 4 Item No. 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 17, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chair Bob Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Chair Bob Hagel ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo (absent), Watts PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Turley-Trejo absent): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Watts. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Turley-Trejo absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the action minutes of March 20, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Planning Application Numbers PA23-0030, PA23-0026, and PA23-0027, a Development Plan to allow the construction of two commercial structures totaling approximately 4,414 square feet and related Conditional Use Permits for drive-thru lanes. Structures will be used for a restaurant and coffee shop. The project is located at 29540 Rancho California Road, Eric Jones Recommendation: Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA23-0030, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 4,414 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT 29540 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-320-061) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA23-0027, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A NEW RESTAURANT TO INCORPORATE A DRIVE-THRU LOCATED AT 29540 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-320-061) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA23-0026, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A NEW COFFEE SHOP TO INCORPORATE A DRIVE-THRU LOCATED AT 29540 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 921-320-061) Approved the Staff Recommendation (4 0, Turley-Trejo absent): Motion by Solis, Second by Watts. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Turley-Trejo absent. 3. Long Range Project Number LR21-1331, a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP), Mark Collins Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR21-1331, THE TEMECULA CREEK COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN (CWPP) AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PER SECTION 15061(13)(3) AND SECTION 15262 Approved the Staff Recommendation (4 0, Turley-Trejo absent): Motion by Watts, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Turley-Trejo absent. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT 2 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, May 1, 2023, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bob Hagel, Chair Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Item No. 2 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 15, 2024 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Katie Garcia, Planning Technician PROJECT General Plan Consistency Review of the Proposed Draft Fiscal Years SUMMARY: 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets (Long Range Project No. LR24-0141) CEQA: Exempt: Not a Project as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) and exempt under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(3) and 15262 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution making a finding of consistency with the General Plan for the Proposed Draft Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Sheets and make a finding of exemption under Sections 15378(b)(4), 15061(b)(3), and 15262 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Long Range Planning Project No. LR24-0141) BACKGROUND Sections 65402 and 65403 of State Planning and Zoning Law require that the Planning Commission review and provide comments to the City Council regarding the conformity of the proposed Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") with the adopted General Plan. The draft proposed CIP budget sheets were developed based on the previous CIP project list and current community needs. The public had an opportunity to provide input to the draft CIP budget sheets during a workshop with the City Council and City Staff on May 9, 2024. The primary focus of this workshop was to ensure that City Council's vision is in line with community needs in the areas of roads, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities, and housing projects. All projects are reviewed to ensure consistency with the provisions of the City's General Plan, as well as the long-term vision of the City as defined by the Quality of Life Master Plan. The projects within the Capital Improvement Program are divided into five general categories including Circulation, Infrastructure, Parks and Recreation, Housing, and Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds. Staff has reviewed the Capital Improvement Program for consistency with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The Capital Improvement Program is scheduled to be reviewed and approved by the City Council on May 28, 2024. The attached proposed draft for Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets are subject to change, pending City Council approval. ANALYSIS CIRCULATION PROJECTS The Fiscal Years 2025-29 CIP contains twenty-six (26) Circulation Projects. The Projects consist of new circulation infrastructure, public facilities, and traffic safety improvements. The Circulation Projects are as follows: 1. Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes 2. Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements 3. Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing 4. De Portola/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout Project 5. Diaz Road Expansion 6. Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs 7. French Valley Parkway/ I-15 Improvements - Phase II 8. French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements - Phase III 9. French Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements — Phase IV 10. I-15 Congestion Relief 11. I-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 12. Medians and Parkways — Citywide 13. Motor Car Parkway Improvements 14. Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland 15. North General Kearny Street Improvements 16. Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center 17. Overland Drive Widening 18. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide 19. Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation 20. Rancho California Road Median Improvements 21. Traffic Signal - Equipment Enhancement Program - Citywide 22. Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide 23. Traffic Signal - Park and Ride Access Improvements 24. Traffic Signal - System Upgrade (Protected/Permissive Signal Heads) 25. Ynez Road Improvements - Phase I 26. Ynez Road Improvements - Phase II Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with the provisions of the Circulation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Air Quality, and Community Design Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction, or that indicated an inconsistency between the Circulation Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. 2 Circulation Element Goal 1 Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non -peak hours. Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Goal A regional transportation system that accommodates the safe and efficient movement of people and goods to and from the community. Policy 2.1 Actively pursue the construction of system improvements outside the City's jurisdiction in cooperation with Caltrans, the City of Murrieta, Riverside County, the Pechanga Band, and local developers. Measures should be taken to preserve anticipated right-of-way needs and to identify funding mechanisms for needed interchange and regional arterial improvements. Policy 2.2 Develop a bypass system of roadways on the east, west and south sides of the City to accommodate traffic flow from development outside the City and improve center -of - town traffic conditions. Policy 2.3 Actively pursue improvements to current freeway interchanges within the City and construction of new overpasses as required to achieve performance standards. Goal 3 An efficient City circulation system through the use of transportation system management and travel demand management strategies. Policy 3.1 Require proper spacing and interconnect traffic signals where feasible to maximize the smooth progression of traffic flows and to minimize delay and stop -and -go conditions. Policy 3.3 Provide a comprehensive system of Class I and/or Class II bicycle lanes to meet the needs of cyclists traveling to and from work and other destinations within the City. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Goal 1 Cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County. Policy 1.7 Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development and protect and enhance quality of life. 3 Goal Orderly and efficient patterns of growth that enhance quality of life for Temecula residents. Policy 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occurs in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. Air Ouality Element Goal 3 Enhance mobility to minimize air pollutant emissions. Policy 3.2 Use transportation systems management techniques to maintain an orderly flow of traffic and improve mobility. Policy 3.4 Establish a convenient and efficient system of bicycle routes and pedestrian walkways. Policy 3.5 Promote the use of alternative clean -fueled vehicles, new transportation technologies, and combustion engine alternatives for personal and business use. Goal 4 Adopt effective energy conservation and recycling practices to reduce emissions. Policy 4.1 Encourage community -wide reductions in energy consumption through conservation. Policy 4.2 Promote local recycling of wastes and the use of recycled materials. Community Design Element Goal A streetscape system that provides cohesiveness and enhances community image. Policy 4.1 Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and trail system throughout the City. Policy 4.8 Work with Caltrans to implement a freeway and interchange landscaping and planting program to improve the appearance of the community. This program should incorporate appropriate native and drought tolerant species. HOUSING The Fiscal Year 2025-29 CIP contains four (4) Housing Projects. The Housing Projects focus on improving affordable housing opportunities within the City. The Housing Projects are as follows: 1. Habitat For Humanity — Old Town Units 2. Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project 3. Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site 4 4. Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with the provisions of the Land Use and Housing Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Housing Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Land Use Element Goal 1 A diverse and integrated mix of residential commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. Policy 1.2 Promote the use of innovative site planning techniques that contribute to development of a variety of residential product styles and designs, including housing suitable for the community's labor force. Policy 1.6 Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and facilities. Policy 1.7 Pursue opportunities to locate higher density housing with supporting commercial and public uses west of I-15. Housing Element Goal 1 Provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula. Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing types in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types. Policy 1.3 Require a mixture of diverse housing types and densities in new developments around the village centers to enhance their pedestrian orientation and diversity. Policy 1.4 Support the use of innovative site planning and architectural design in residential development. Policy 1.6 Encourage the development of compatible mixed -use projects that promote and enhance the village concept, facilitate the efficient use of public facilities, and support alternative transit options. Goal 2 Provide affordable housing in all economic segments of Temecula. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population and provide opportunities to meet the City's fair share of Low and Moderate Income housing. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups. INFRASTRUCTURE The Fiscal Years 2025-29 CIP contains fifty-seven (57) Infrastructure Projects. The Infrastructure Projects consist of enhancements or repairs to existing and new community infrastructure. The Infrastructure projects are as follows: 1. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation 2. Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs 3. Bike Lane and Trail Program - Citywide 4. Bike Lane and Trails Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting 5. Bike Lane and Trails Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails 6. Bike Lane and Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail 7. Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide 8. Bridge Maintenance 9. City Facilities Rehabilitation 10. City Facility Security 11. City Security Camera System 12. Citywide Drainage Master Plan 13. Citywide Financial System Upgrade 14. Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit 15. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations 16. Community Wildfire Protection Plan 17. Comprehensive General Plan Update 18. Electric Vehicles Charging Station 19. Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade 20. Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide 21. Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage 22. Fire Station 84 Renovation 23. I-15/ State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping 24. I-15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements 25. Library Alternate Emergency Operations Center Enhancements 26. Library Technology Enhancements 27. Margarita Recreation Center 28. Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator 29. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation 30. Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area 31. Medians and Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide 32. Murrieta Creek Improvements 33. Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension 6 34. Old Town Parking Structure 35. Old Town Security Camera & Sound System 36. Old Town Parklets Program 37. Pavement Management Program Update 38. Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades — Citywide 39. Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade — Citywide 40. RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program 41. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 42. Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing 43. Sidewalks — Citywide 44. Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements 45. Sidewalks — Third Street 46. Sidewalks — Pauba Road 47. Sixth Street Improvements 48. South Side Senior Center for Active Adults 49. Storm Drain Pipe Lining 50. Temecula Creek Fencing 51. Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation 52. Traffic Signal — Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade Phase 2 — Citywide 53. Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road 54. Traffic Signal — Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade — Citywide 55. Urban Forest Management Plan 56. Utility Undergrounding — Citywide 57. Vacant Parcel Clean-up and Beautification Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with provisions of the Land Use, Circulation, Open Space/Conservation, and Growth Management/Public Facilities, Public Safety, Community Design, Air Quality, and Economic Development Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Infrastructure Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Land Use Element Goal 1 A diverse and integrated mix of residential commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses. Policy 1.6 Encourage flexible zoning techniques in appropriate locations to encourage mixed use development, preserve natural features, achieve innovative site design, achieve a range of transition of densities, provide open space and recreation facilities, and/or provide necessary amenities and facilities. Policy 1.9 Establish paseos, greenbelts, linear parks and trails within buffer areas between developments and the City's edge. Goal A development pattern that preserves aesthetics and enhances the environmental resources of the Planning Area. Policy 6.1 Preserve the natural aesthetic quality of hillsides and reduce hazards associated with hillside development within the Planning Area. Policy 6.5 Create distinctive features at entry points to the City that emphasize Temecula's aesthetic and environmental setting. Circulation Element Goal 3 An efficient City circulation system through the use of transportation system management and travel demand management strategies. Policy 3.1 Require proper spacing and interconnect traffic signals where feasible to maximize the smooth progression of traffic flows and to minimize delay and stop -and -go conditions. Policy 3.3 Provide a comprehensive system of Class I and/or Class II bicycle lanes to meet the needs of cyclists traveling to and from work and other destinations within the City. Policy 3.5 Encourage the provision of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, including park -and -ride lots near the I-15 freeway and within mixed use overlay areas and village centers. Goal 5 Safe and efficient alternatives to motorized travel throughout the City. Policy 5.1 Promote pedestrian and bicycle safety by adhering to uniform trail standards and practices and communicating safety practices to the public. Policy 5.2 Minimize potential conflicts between off-street bicycle and equestrian trails and automobile cross traffic. Policy 5.3 Ensure the accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. 8 Policy 5.4 Provide a comprehensive network of multi -use trails and bikeways between residential areas and commercial/employment activity centers, public institutions, and recreation areas. Policy 5.6 Encourage the provision of facilities that support carpooling and public transportation within the City. Goal 6 Enhanced traffic safety on City streets. Policy 6.2 Require that future roads and improvements to current roads to be designed to minimize traffic conflicts which result from curb parking maneuvers, uncontrolled access along heavily traveled roadways, and development of private driveways on primary residential collector streets. Policy 6.3 Require that vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traffic be separated to the maximum extent feasible, especially in areas with high traffic volumes. Goal 7 An adequate supply of private and public parking to meet the needs of residents and visitors to the City. Policy 7.2 Provide additional public parking in the Old Town area where feasible through common parking areas or establishment of a parking district. Open Space/Conservation Element Goal 2 Conservation and protection of surface water, groundwater and imported water resources. Policy 2.1 Coordinate with the Riverside County Flood Control District to design flood control improvements that preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, important natural features and resources of the local creeks and riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River. Policy 2.3 Conserve potable water by requiring water conservation technical in all new development. Goal 5 Conservation of open space areas for a balance of recreation, scenic enjoyment, and protection of natural resources and features. Policy 5.1 Conserve the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in the Sphere of Influence, and other important landforms and historic landscape features through the development review process. Goal 8 Development of a trail system that serves both recreational and transportation needs. 9 Policy 8.1 Provide a Citywide recreation system that connects to the County's regional trail system which provides for bicycling, equestrian, hiking, and jogging trails with appropriate support facilities. Policy 8.3 Require proposed development of provide trail connections to the citywide trail system through the dedication of land and the provision of easements. Policy 8.5 Develop trails and sidewalks suitable for multiple users, including for the physically disabled and for personal transportation alternatives. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Goal 1 Cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County. Policy 1.7 Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development and protect and enhance quality of life. Goal Orderly and efficient patterns of growth that enhance quality of life for Temecula residents. Policy 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occurs in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. Goal Public and quasi -public facilities and services that provide for the social, cultural, civic, religious, and recreational need of the community. Policy 5.4 Explore opportunities to expand and provide additional community meeting space. Policy 5.5 Encourage provision of cultural facilities within the community, including museums, theaters, arts center, a performing arts center, special exhibitions, an outdoor amphitheater, and public art. Policy 5.7 Provide library facilities and services for educational, cultural, and recreational purposes. Goal 6 A water and wastewater infrastructure system that supports development in the planning area. Policy 6.4 Coordinate with the wastewater district to make reclaimed water available for irrigation purposes in the City. Policy 6.5 Encourage preparation of long-term water management programs by local water agencies. Goal 7 An effective, safe and environmentally compatible flood control system. 10 Policy 7.1 Work with the Riverside County Flood Control District and other agencies involved with Murrieta Creek flood control improvements to implement a solution that maximizes retention of natural resources and provision of recreation opportunities along the Creek. Policy 7.2 Develop master drainage plans, when appropriate, for the Sphere of Influence, in conjunction with the Flood Control District. Policy 7.3 Wherever possible, give priority to flood control methods that maintain natural areas, maximize the beneficial uses of water through natural systems, and provide additional trail opportunities. Public Safety Element Goal 3 A safe and secure community free from the threat of personal injury and loss of property. Policy 3.1 Ensure adequate facilities and police and fire service personnel are provided in the City. Goal 4 An effective response of emergency series following a disaster. Policy 4.1 Provide for and maintain a coordinated emergency services response to reduce community risks and property damage in the event of a disaster. Policy 4.5 Regulate the location of critical facilities to ensure they continue to function after a disaster. Community Design Element Goal 1 Enhancement of the City's image related to its regional and natural setting and its tourist orientation. Policy 1.1 Develop a comprehensive system of trails and open space areas connecting schools, public recreation areas, residential areas, and commercial centers. Policy 1.4 Promote community identity by providing specially designed gateway signs and landscape enhancements at the primary entrances to the City. Goal A streetscape system that provides cohesiveness and enhances community image. Policy 4.1 Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and trail system throughout the City. ilk Policy 4.3 Encourage variety in the design of sidewalks and trails, with respect to alignment and surface materials and separating sidewalks from the curb along arterial streets to provide Goal 5 Protection of public views of significant natural features. Policy 5.6 Promote and implement underground utilities (cable, power, etc.) where feasible. Goal 6 Maintain and enhance public spaces and resources within the City. Policy 6.3 Assure that operating and maintenance costs are adequately provided for public facilities. Policy 6.4 Promote use of public art in public spaces, specifically open space areas and entry points throughout the City. Goal 7 Community gathering areas which provide for the social, civic, cultural and recreational needs of the community. Policy 7.6 Promote the provision of cultural facilities within the community including: art museums, theaters, performing art centers, outdoor amphitheaters, special cultural exhibitions, and public art. Air Quality Element Goal 3 Enhance mobility to minimize air pollutant emissions. Policy 3.4 Establish a convenient and efficient system of bicycle routes and pedestrian walkways. Policy 3.5 Promote the use of alternative clean -fueled vehicles, new transportation technologies, and combustion engine alternatives for person and business use. Goal 4 Adopt effective energy conservation and recycling practices to reduce emissions. Policy 4.1 Encourage community -wide reduction in energy consumption through conservation. Economic Development Goal 1 A strong base of clean manufacturing activities which employs a skilled labor force and can be successfully integrated into Temecula's community character. Policy 1.2 Encourage the growth and expansion of industry by providing high quality municipal services, facilities, and economic development assistance. Goal 2 A diverse economic base including a range of manufacturing, retail, service, and knowledge -based professional activities. 12 Policy 2.2 Plan for land use and development patterns that allow succession of use, adapt to Temecula's economic conditions, and promote development of properly located and well -designed commercial centers meeting the diverse service needs for the City. Policy 2.5 Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services for resident, workers and tourists, including apparel general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. Goal A sound economic base providing a fiscal foundation for the City, quality community facilities, and high service levels. Policy 3.1 Encourage a pattern of development that balances revenue generating land uses in phase with other uses that have negative fiscal impacts. Policy 3.4 Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as a retail center. PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS The Fiscal Year 2025-29 CIP contains twenty (20) Parks and Recreation Projects. The Parks and Recreation Projects consist of maintenance or enhancements to existing parks and recreation facilities. The Parks and Recreation Projects are as follows: 1. Children's Museum Enhancement Project 2. Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures 3. Dog Park Renovation 4. Empire Creek Improvements 5. Harveston Community Park Building Renovations and Expansion 6. Infill Recreation Amenities 7. Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms 8. Park Restrooms Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Improvements 9. Parks Improvements Program 10. Pickleball Courts 11. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing 12. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink 13. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure 14. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation 15. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park 16. Sports Court Resurfacing 17. Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion 18. Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project 19. Uptown Temecula Sports Park 20. Vail Ranch Park Restrooms Disability Act (ADA) 13 Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with provisions of the Open Space/Conservation, Community Design, Growth Management/Public Facilities, and Air Quality Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Parks and Recreation Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Open Space/Conservation Element Goal 1 A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the diverse recreation needs of residents. Policy 1.4 Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses in park design and development, including location of buildings, activity areas, lighting, and parking. Policy 1.7 Consider the establishment of special use parks for seniors, pets, etc. Goal 2 Conservation and protection of surface water, groundwater and imported water resources. Policy 2.1 Coordinate with the Riverside County Flood Control District to design flood control improvements that preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, important natural features and resources of the local creeks and riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River. Policy 2.3 Conserve potable water by requiring water conservation technical in all new development. Community Design Element Goal 3 Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual district or neighborhoods. Policy 3.1 Improve the appearance of neighborhood areas and neighborhood edges through landscaping, location of open space buffers, and special landscape features. Goal 7 Community gathering areas which provide for the social, civic, cultural and recreational needs of the community. Policy 7.6 Promote provision of cultural facilities within the community including: art museums, theaters, performing art centers, outdoor amphitheaters, special cultural exhibitions, and public art. 14 Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Goal I Cooperative management of growth among local governments within Riverside County Policy 1.7 Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development, and protect and enhance quality of life. Goal 4 A quality school system with adequate facilities and funding to educate youth of Temecula. Policy 4.6 Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and desirable, including: school grounds, buildings, City parks, multi -purpose buildings, and recreation facilities. Goal 6 A water and wastewater infrastructure system that supports development in the planning area. Policy 6.4 Coordinate with the wastewater district to make reclaimed water available for irrigation purposes in the City. Air Quality Element Goal 4 Adopt effective energy conservation and recycling practices to reduce emission. Policy 4.1 Encourage community -wide reduction in energy consumption through conservation. PROJECTS FUNDED BY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BONDS The Fiscal Year 2025-29 CIP contains three (3) Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds. The Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds consist of constructing desired and authorized public improvements with costs of the projects paid for by the benefitted properties within the boundaries of a designated area. The costs are then financed through the issuance of bonds payable over a period of years. The Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds are as follows: 1. Butterfield Stage Road Extension 2. Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 3. Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with the provisions of the Circulation and Open Space/Conservation Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Projects Funded by Community Facilities 15 District Bonds and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Circulation Element Goal 1 Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non -peak hours. Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Open Space/Conservation Element Goal Conservation of important biological habitats and protection of plant and animal species of concern, wildlife movement corridors, and general biodiversity. Policy 3.7 Maintain and enhance the resources of Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, Murrieta Creek, Santa Gertrudis Creek, Santa Margarita River, and other waterways to ensure the long-term viability of the habitat, wildlife, and wildlife movement corridors. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program is not a "project" as defined by Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The Planning Commission's review and determination that the Fiscal Years 2025 -29 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. Moreover, if the Planning Commission's determination that the CIP is consistent with the General Plan is determined to be a project under CEQA, then it is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines which provides that a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City has not approved, adopted, or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this CIP and conducting public hearings on it, the Planning Commission has considered relevant environmental factors. The City, as the lead agency for environmental review pursuant CEQA, has reviewed the scope and nature of this CIP and has concluded that the planning and prioritization process comprising this activity is 16 not a project pursuant to CEQA because it does not order or authorize the commencement of any physical or other activity that would directly or indirectly have a significant effect upon the environment. The CIP merely establishes a listing of priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary planning studies, including review pursuant to CEQA, at a future unspecified date. The future planning studies will be conducted at the earliest possible time so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to CEQA. Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as regards to CEQA, the Planning Commission has also considered this CIP as if it were a Project pursuant to CEQA. The Planning Commission concludes the Project is exempt from review under CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the CIP are undertaken. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution 2. Draft FY2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets 17 PC RESOLUTION NO.2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED DRAFT FISCAL YEARS 2025-2029 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET SHEETS AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4), 15061(B)(3), AND 15262 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR24-0141) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby End, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula originally adopted a comprehensive General Plan in 2005, which has been amended to include specific policies and objectives for infrastructure, construction and maintenance of public facilities; and B. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65402 and 65403, the Planning Commission is required to review Capital Improvement Program to determine that it is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan; and C. Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with the provisions of the Circulation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Air Quality, Community Design, Land Use, Open Space/Conservation, Public Safety, Economic Development, and the Housing Elements of the adopted General Plan; and D. On May 15, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a public meeting to consider the proposed budget sheet for Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and E. The projects within the CIP are divided into five general categories including Circulation, Infrastructure, Parks and Recreation, Housing, and Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds; and F. The Eve categories listed in the attached Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program and the staff report analysis consistency hereto demonstrates that all of these capital projects are consistent with goals, policies and program of the Temecula General Plan. The findings of consistency set forth in the staff report are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution: A. The Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The Planning Commission's review and determination that the Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. Moreover, if the Planning Commission's determination that the CIP is consistent with the General Plan is determined to be a project under CEQA, then it is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines which provides that a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions, which actions the City has not approved, adopted, or funded, does not require preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors. In reviewing this CIP and conducting public hearings on it, the Planning Commission has considered relevant environmental factors. The City, as the lead agency for environmental review pursuant CEQA, has reviewed the scope and nature of this CIP and has concluded that the planning and prioritization process comprising this activity is not a project pursuant to CEQA because it does not order or authorize the commencement of any physical or other activity that would directly or indirectly have a significant effect upon the environment. The CIP merely establishes a listing of priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary planning studies, including review pursuant to CEQA, at a future unspecified date. The future planning studies will be conducted at the earliest possible time so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to CEQA. Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as regards to CEQA, the Planning Commission has also considered this CIP as if it were a Project pursuant to CEQA. The Planning Commission concludes the Project is exempt from review under CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the CIP are undertaken. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of May, 2024. Bob Hagel, Chair ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of May 2024, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary PROPOSED CAPITAl IMPROVFMFNT PRC PJF. -;, X � F � f "l. is y / � •. s' AN �T . FISCAL YEARS 2025-2029 oP may{ 1 9�" n, 1f4 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2025-29 City Council James "Stew" Stewart, Mayor Brenden Kalfus, Mayor Pro Tern Jessica Alexander, Council Member Zak Schwank, Council Member City of Temecula City Management Aaron Adams, City Manager Kevin Hawkins, Assistant City Manager Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Patrick Thomas, Public Works Director Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 (951) 694-6430 TemeculaCA.gov The Heart of S—ti- Wine Caunt,y TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................9 TransmittalMessage.............................................................................................................................9 California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) Certificate of Award................................17 CityOrganizational Chart....................................................................................................................18 Descriptionof Levels...........................................................................................................................19 Parameters for CIP Budget Cost Estimates.........................................................................................20 Description of Revenue Sources.........................................................................................................21 Capital Improvement Project List.......................................................................................................26 SUMMARIES..................................................................................................................................31 Projected Revenue Summary..............................................................................................................31 CIP Major Revenue Sources Graph.....................................................................................................34 CIPExpenditure Summary..................................................................................................................35 Expenditure Summary by Project Type Chart.....................................................................................39 Capital Projects Summary — by Funding Source.................................................................................40 Capital Projects Summary— by Project...............................................................................................55 Summary of Operating & Maintenance Impacts................................................................................67 CIRCULATION PROJECTS.................................................................................................................69 Circulation Projects Location Map..................................................................................................... 70 Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes.................................................................................... 71 Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements.......................................................................... 72 Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing.......................................................................... 73 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout Project............................................................. 74 DiazRoad Expansion.......................................................................................................................... 75 Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs......................................................................................... 77 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements —Phase II..................................................................... 78 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements —Phase III.................................................................... 80 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements —Phase IV.................................................................... 82 1-15 Congestion Relief........................................................................................................................ 83 1-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange............................................................................ 84 Medians& Parkways — Citywide........................................................................................................ 86 3 The Heart of S—ti- Wine Caunt,y TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Motor Car Parkway Improvements...................................................................................................87 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland...................................................................................................88 North General Kearny Street Improvements....................................................................................90 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center...................................................................................91 OverlandDrive Widening..................................................................................................................92 Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide..................................................................................93 Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation.............................................................................95 Rancho California Road Median Improvements...............................................................................96 Traffic Signal — Equipment Enhancement Program — Citywide........................................................97 Traffic Signal — Installation — Citywide..............................................................................................98 Traffic Signal — Park & Ride Access Improvements...........................................................................100 Traffic Signal — System Upgrade (Protected/Permissive Signal Heads)............................................101 Ynez Road Improvements — Phase I..................................................................................................102 YnezRoad Improvements —Phase II.................................................................................................103 HOUSING.....................................................................................................................................105 Housing Projects Location Map........................................................................................................106 Habitat for Humanity — Old Town Units............................................................................................107 Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project.......................................................................................108 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site......................................................................................109 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project.............................................................................................110 INFRASTRUCTURE/OTHER PROJECTS............................................................................................111 Infrastructure Projects Location Map...............................................................................................112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation............................................113 Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs..............................................................................................................114 Bike Lane and Trail Program — Citywide............................................................................................115 Bike Lane and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting....................................................................117 Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails.....................................................118 Bike Lane and Trail Program —Temecula Creek South Side Trail......................................................119 BikeLane Upgrades — Citywide.........................................................................................................120 BridgeMaintenance..........................................................................................................................121 4 The Heart of S—ti- Wine Caunt,y TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program City Facilities Rehabilitation..............................................................................................................122 CityFacility Security..........................................................................................................................123 CitySecurity Camera System............................................................................................................124 Citywide Drainage Master Plan.........................................................................................................125 Citywide Financial System Upgrade..................................................................................................126 Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit............................................127 Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations.......................................................................... 128 Community Wildfire Protection Plan............................................................................................... 129 Comprehensive General Plan Update...............................................................................................130 Electric Vehicles Charging Station.....................................................................................................132 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade...................................................................................133 Fiber Optic Communications Systems — Citywide.........................................................................................134 FireStation 73 Gym/Garage..............................................................................................................135 Fire Station 84 Renovation................................................................................................................136 1-15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping......................................................137 Interstate 15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements.........................................................138 Library Alternative Emergency Operations Center Enhancements..................................................139 Library Technology Enhancements...................................................................................................140 Margarita Recreation Center............................................................................................................141 Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator......................................................................... 142 Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation............................................................ 143 Mary Philips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area...................................................................144 Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements — Citywide.....................................................................145 Murrieta Creek Improvements.........................................................................................................146 Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension............................................................................................148 OldTown Parking Structure..............................................................................................................149 Old Town Security Camera &Sound System.....................................................................................150 Old Town Temecula Parklets Program..............................................................................................151 Pavement Management Program Update........................................................................................152 Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades — Citywide.............................................................................................153 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade — Citywide............................................................................154 RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program......................................................................155 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension................................................................156 Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under-Crossing............................................................157 Sidewalks— Citywide.........................................................................................................................158 Sidewalks — Old Town Improvements...............................................................................................159 Sidewalks —Third Street....................................................................................................................160 Sidewalks— Pauba Road....................................................................................................................161 Sixth Street Improvements...............................................................................................................162 South Side Senior Center for Active Adults.......................................................................................163 StormDrain Pipe Lining.....................................................................................................................164 Temecula Creek Fencing...................................................................................................................165 Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation.......................................................................166 Traffic Signal — Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade Phase 2 — Citywide......................................167 Traffic Signal — Promenade Mall Ring Road......................................................................................168 Traffic Signal — Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade — Citywide...............................169 Urban Forest Management Plan.......................................................................................................170 Utility Undergrounding— Citywide....................................................................................................171 Vacant Parcel Clean -Up and Beautification......................................................................................172 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS.............................................................................................173 Parks and Recreation Projects Location Map...................................................................................174 Children's Museum Enhancement Project........................................................................................175 Community Recreation Center Splash Pad &Shade Structures........................................................176 DogPark Renovation.........................................................................................................................177 EmpireCreek Improvements............................................................................................................178 Harveston Community Park Building Renovations and Expansion...................................................179 Infill Recreational Amenities.............................................................................................................180 Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms.................................................................................................181 Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvement 182 Parks Improvement Program............................................................................................................183 The Heart of S—the— CalH Wine Caunt,y TABLE OF CONTENTS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program PickleballCourts................................................................................................................................184 Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing................................................................185 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink...........................................................................................187 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure................................................................ 188 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation...................................................... 189 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park.............................................................................................190 Sports Court Resurfacing..................................................................................................................191 Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion.........................................................192 Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project..............................................................................................193 Uptown Temecula Sports Park..........................................................................................................194 VailRanch Park Restrooms...............................................................................................................195 PROJECTS FUNDED BY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BONDS PROJECTS ................................ 197 Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Project Locator Map................................198 Butterfield Stage Road Extension.....................................................................................................199 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements.........................................................................................200 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation................................................................................. 201 FUTUREYEAR PROJECTS............................................................................................................... 203 APPENDIX.................................................................................................................................... 205 LocatorMap..................................................................................................................................... 205 Summary of Completed Projects..................................................................................................... 206 Glossaryof Terms............................................................................................................................. 207 Summary of Affordable Housing Investment.................................................................................. 214 Fiscal Year 2024-25 Debt Obligations.............................................................................................. 216 Status of Pavement Management Program..................................................................................... 217 Ink [[ The Heart of So�[4� a!H Wine Cawtry TRANSMITTAL MESSAGE May 9, 2024 Members of the City Council: City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program It is with great pleasure that I submit the City of Temecula's Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2024-25 through 2028-29. This document is the result of several internal CIP review meetings, which incorporates previous City Council direction and feedback obtained from each of the City's Commissions. Staff has analyzed each project for feasibility, necessity, funding sources, and timing. All departments were involved in the process and contributed significantly to the discussions, resulting in a comprehensive Five -Year Capital Improvement Program. All projects presented in this five-year budget have been carefully programmed to ensure the community's capital improvement needs are met both now and in the future. CITY OF TEMECULA PROFILE AND DEMOGRAPHICS The City of Temecula is a dynamic community located approximately 60 miles north of San Diego, California. The City extends across 30 square miles of gently rolling hills and comprises approximately 108,899 residents from diverse cultural backgrounds. 4P(D 0 0 Population 42 City 345 Miles 29 K-12 Median Average Unemployment 108,899 Parks of Streets Schools Income Home Price o (2023) Rate 4.4/ $141,899 $797,500 (Mar'24) (Mar'24) Temecula's residents enjoy one of the finest lifestyles Southern California has to offer. Environmental and residential factors produce a beautiful setting that attracts young, well- educated families to homes that are inexpensive by Southern California standards. Geography contributes to the City's population and retail growth from San Diego and Orange Counties. Temecula's leadership has approached economic growth from a qualitative standpoint, providing Temecula with a favorable share of the region's higher paying and high technology career opportunities. The City's average income levels are higher than the surrounding region, the educational performance of its young people is above the State average, and Temecula has been recognized as one of Nation's safest cities. E The Heart of S—ti-- C.10. a Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program FISCAL YEARS 2025-29 CIP HIGHLIGHTS The CIP includes a total of 113 separate projects totaling $927,198,632, of which $629,152,335 in project funding has been secured. There is $298,046,303 in "Unspecified" project funding, indicating that a revenue source has not yet been identified for these projects, which have been deemed necessary infrastructure for the City, and will require that funding sources be identified before the project construction can commence. Capital projects are categorized into five Project Types, as noted in the adjacent table. A total of $51,126,166 has been spent in prior years, and Project Type Number of Projects Total Project Cost Circulation 26 647,366,739 Housing 4 20,401,000 Infrastructure 58 132,859,106 Parks/Rec 22 62,115,054 CFD-Funded 3 64,456,733 $51,728,967 is projected to be spent in Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25. Unspent budget amounts will roll forward to the ensuing fiscal year to ensure there is adequate funding to complete the capital project. Various sources contribute to the funding of the Capital Improvement Program, including many City Funds, State and Federal Grants, Community Facility District Funds, Successor Agency Funds, and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Funds. The City seeks all available funding sources for projects, including federal, state, and local grants, outside contributions and City sources. Total funding for the Fiscal Years 2025-29 CIP program reflects 64% from outside funding sources, with the remaining 36% provided by various City sources, including Measure S, Development Impact Fee Funds, General Fund, Capital Financing, and several other funding sources. Capital Project Project Funding TUMF , 54,161,598,8% City Funds, State/Local Grants, 244,544,003, 79,660,033, 13% 39% Reimbursements, 43,001,054, 7% Federal Grants, 96,996,928, 15% Development Community Impact Fees, Facility Districts, 54,198,117, 9% 55,840,601, 9% A total of 11 new projects have been added to the CIP including the following: 1) Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes 2) Empire Creek Improvements 3) 1-15/French Valley Parkway — Phase IV 4) Library Alternative Emergency Operations Center Enhancements 5) Library Technology Enhancements 6) Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms 7) North General Kearny Street Improvements 10 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 The Hean of t 1101e CaMar-a Wine C-try Capital Improvement Program 8) Sixth Street Improvements 9) South Side Senior Center for Active Adults 10) Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project 11) Vail Ranch Park Restrooms As part of the development of the Capital Improvement Program budget, each project is evaluated to identify any ongoing impacts to the Operating Budget. Eight projects reflect the addition of ongoing operating costs, while one project identifies ongoing operating savings. The amounts identified on the table are incorporated into the General Fund and TCSD Five -Year Forecasts. Summary of Operating & Maintenance Impacts Maintenance and Operations of PW17-01/711- CITY SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM 5250- OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Security Camera System 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 FN19-01/724- CITYWIDE FINANCIAL SYSTEM UPGRADE 5211- SOFTWARE &MAINTENANCE Annual Software Maintenance 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 PW17-18/688 - CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION & LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RETROFIT 5319-STREET LIGHTING Electricity Savings (695,564) (709,475) (723,665) (738,138) PW17-19/690 - I-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING 5415 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Required by Caltrans 60,830 62,046 63,289 65,188 PW17-21/692- MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER 5100- SALARIES &WAGES Staffing for MRC(4 positions) 527,453 548,551 570,493 591,600 Project Staffing for MRC 5119 - PART-TIME (PROJECT) (45 positions - 13.07 FTEs) 707,078 735,361 764,775 795,366 5240 - UTI LITI ES Additional Utility Costs 71,400 72,828 74,285 77,034 5250- OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial/Security 129,302 131,888 134,526 139,504 1,435,233 1,488,628 1,544,079 1,603,504 IT20-01/780 - OLD TOWN SECRUITY CAMERA & SOUND Maintenance fee for Old Town SYSTEM 5215 - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Sound System 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 PWPE07-03/PW23-18- LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOMS 5250- OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 PW PE-07/155 - PARK RESTROOMS RENOVATIONS, EXPANSION AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS 5250- OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 27.602 28.154 28.717 29.292 PWPE07-02- VAIL RANCH PARK RESTROOMS 5250- OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 LOCAL ECONOMY AND LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS Local Economy As the economic indicators noted above fluctuate, the impact on the local economy is evident in the retail activity and sales tax trends. The majority of the local sources of funding for capital projects come from Sales Tax, Measure S and Measure A revenue, all of which fluctuate with the health of the economy. Projections for these funding sources are conservative and range between 0-2.5% growth in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Despite a recent reduction of Sales Tax revenue, both national retailers and local entrepreneurs continue to invest in Temecula by opening businesses, undergoing expansion projects and starting new construction. 11 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program With Temecula's regional shopping mall, Old Town district, and auto mall, shoppers from the entire Temecula Valley region contribute to the City's sales tax base. Per the City's Sales Tax consultant, HdL Companies, Temecula residents generated $37,400 in sales tax per capita in 2023, which far outpaced neighboring cities and statewide averages. The Temecula economy continues to attract new businesses, with several new establishments that have recently opened or are expected to open soon. Both national franchises and local establishments alike will be a welcome addition to the local economy. New Business opening in 2024: • Silverlake Ramen • Lovesac Furniture • Aldi (2nd location) • Soho Ramen & Sake Bar • La Fata Tasting Room • Roadrunner Sports • Big Brand Tire & Service • Red Door Escape Room • Haven Haus Brunch • Smart & Final EXTRA New Businesses coming soon: • Better Buzz Coffee Roasters #2 • Ono Hawaiian BBQ • Sneaker Lounge • Portals Entertainment • Crafted Scone #2 • Ross Dress for Less #2 • Dogtopia • Dan Henderson Restaurant • Goucho Grill • Tasty Pot Temecula W2R0A❑ 17UIVIVER .5PORT-9 LOV C SAC Designed for Life Furniture Co _fBIGBRAND. TIRE R SERVICE • Humble Somm Marx Cellars • Cava • Harbor Freight • 85C Degree Bakery Cafe • Marshall Stuart Cellars Tasting Room • Bare Knuckle Brewing Company • Dutch Bros Coffee • UNtuckit Clothing 12 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Country Legislative Impacts City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program The City of Temecula actively follows state and federal legislative proposals each year and works closely with the League of California Cities and the National League of Cities to stay informed and engaged to ensure the City supports legislation that aligns with the City's local legislative platform guiding principles: I. Preservation of Local Control - Support measures that preserve and protect the City's general law powers and duties to enact legislation and policy direction concerning local affairs. Oppose measures that preempt local authority. II. Promotion of Fiscal Stability - Support measures that promote fiscal stability, predictability, and financial independence. Support measures that preserve and promote the City's revenue base. Oppose measures that mandate costs with no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefit. Oppose measures that shift local funds to the county, state, or federal government, without offsetting benefit. III. Supportlll. Support FundingOpportunities -Support measures that allow the City to compete for its fair share of regional, state and federal funding including competitive grants and other funding programs. Support measures that promote dedicated funding streams at the regional, state and federal levels allowing the City to maximize local revenues, offset and leverage capital expenditures, and maintain City goals and standards. Recent legislation that potentially impacts the City's operations include the following: Initiative 21-0042 (The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act) — This ballot measure has qualified for the November 5, 2024 ballot. The provisions of the measure make it more difficult for voters to pass measures needed to fund local services and infrastructure by increasing the threshold for passage and prohibiting local advisory measures. If passed, the measure would require the City to do an in-depth analysis of any new revenue sources and existing revenues streams subject to increases, Consumer Price Index adjustments or otherwise, to determine whether the revenue streams would be subject to voter approval. This would include new or increasing fees related to parks and recreation, community development, public safety, and public works. Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACA) 1 (55% Vote for Local Affordable Housing and Public Infrastructure) — This bill would lower necessary voter threshold from a two-thirds supermajority to 55% to approve local general obligation bods and special taxes for affordable housing and public infrastructure projects. Assembly Constitutional Amendment (ACA) 13 (Voting Thresholds) - The California Constitution provides that a proposed constitutional amendment and a statewide initiative measure each take effect only if approved by a majority of the votes cast on the amendment or measure. This bill 13 Ink [[ The Heart of so�[4� a!H Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program would require future ballot measures that increase voter approval requirements to also pass by the same margin. It would also preserve the right of local governments to place advisory questions on the ballot asking voters their opinions on issues. CIP BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS Each year in January, the City begins the annual Capital Improvement Program budget process with the review of revenue projections and funding sources available for capital projects. The Community Development, Public Works and Fire Departments review the City's projected development activity and corresponding permit fees, development impact fees and related revenues. Grant opportunities are identified as well as available funding from the various City funds. Once all funding sources have been identified, departments review and update their respective capital projects. Update Update Evaluate Prepare Council Final Revenue Project Funding Preliminary Budget Budget Forecasts Requests Options CIP Budget Workshop Adoption (Jan) (Feb/Mar) (Mar/Apr) (Apr) (May) (tun) During the March/April timeframe, all departments participate in an evaluation of the requested projects. Management evaluates project priorities to ensure the City's strategic priorities and goals are met. Additionally, management reviews alternative funding options for the requested projects to ensure eligibility and availability of the request funding sources. Additionally, Finance staff holds Budget Engagement Sessions with each of the City's four commissions to gain feedback on budget priorities. The commissions were asked to rank the priorities for each of the City's seven Core Values outlined in the Quality of Life Master Plan 2040, which is the City's 20-Year strategic plan. The commission also ranked their top six capital projects that had not yet been incorporated into the 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. As a result, the top projects have been added and, where applicable, funding has been identified to initiate the project. In May, the Annual Operating and Capital Improvement Program Budgets are presented to the City Council during their Budget Workshop on May 9, 2024. Any recommended changes from the workshop are then incorporated into the Final Budget, which is adopted by the City Council at the Final Budget Hearing scheduled for May 28, 2024. 14 The Heat of S—ti-. r, - wi e C CAPITAL BUDGET POLICIES City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program The purpose of the CIP Budget document is to serve as a planning tool, which coordinates the financing and scheduling of major projects undertaken by the City. The CIP Budget document has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. This document is dynamic and is revised annually to address changing needs, priorities, and financial conditions. The capital improvements presented in this document include major projects which exceed $30,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are generally non -recurring. Each project cost is identified based on current year estimates. Operating and maintenance costs associated with the projects are projected with a 2% annual inflator and are reflected in the City of Temecula's Annual Operating Budget. The City's Planning Commission reviews all capital projects for consistency with the General Plan as required by California Government Code Section 65401 and provides its findings to the Council prior to the adoption of the Final Capital Improvement Program. Amendments to the Capital Improvement Program up to $100,000 may be authorized by the City Manager. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $100,000 requires City Council action. CORE VALUES / STRATEGIC PRIORITIES The City Council recently adopted the Temecula 2040 Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) in November 2022. The Temecula 2040 Plan is a living document that reflects the vision and long-term goals of the City. As Temecula continues to grow and mature, the Temecula 2040 Plan will be a crucial part of not only maintaining the City's quality of life, but to take a proactive approach and identify specific community needs, goals, and possible improvements. The City of Temecula utilizes the QLMP to formulate and budget Citywide projects and programs. In addition, the QLMP is used to guide future planning, investment decisions, to provide vision and continuity for the next phase of the City's journey, and for continuous process improvement in partnership with Temecula's residents. In an effort to incorporate the QLMP into the City's budget process, the QLMP includes specific goals based on the Core Values of the QLMP. 15 City of Temecula 41 R Fiscal Years 2025-2029 The Heart of- Wi—C Capital Improvement Program The QLMP outlines 7 Core Values: Sustainable & Resilient City 0 Healthy & Livable City Transportation Mobility &Connectivity ® Economic Prosperity Accountable & Responsive City Government Safe & Prepared Community ® Equity All projects presented in the CIP are carefully programmed in concurrence with the City's Quality of Life Master Plan to ensure the community's capital improvement needs are met both now and in the future. The project budget sheets reference the specific Core Value(s) each project satisfies. The framework for the CIP is further defined in the City's CIP fiscal policy to provide a structure within which fiscal decisions can be made and to optimize all available resources toward the accomplishment of the City's Core Values as defined in the QLMP. Projects in this document have been scheduled in each of the five fiscal years based on community needs, as determined by the City Council and availability of funding. Priority rankings in each project category have been assigned in accordance with the priority guidelines as shown on the Description of Priorities page herein. Additionally, since many projects in the CIP are conceptual in nature, a general outline for cost estimates are utilized as shown on the Parameters for CIP Budget Cost page herein. CONCLUSION The revenue estimates, although conservative, are strictly estimates. The actual amount of funding available for construction will vary based upon the state of the economy. The City's major revenue sources are primarily received from various Federal grants, State grant programs, County programs and Special Districts. The City Council will be updated throughout the year on the status of projects and corresponding revenue sources. The Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program is a result of a total team effort of both City staff and City Council. These projects are intended to enhance the safety and quality of life for all citizens in the City of Temecula. I would like to thank staff and the City Council for all of the contributions that were made in developing the capital budget that will serve as the footprint for Temecula's future. Sincerely, 0c, 014"L- Aaron Adams City Manager 16 R The Heart of Southern Cafio—a Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FINANCE OFFICERS AWARD The California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) recognizes those entities with highly professional budget documents with two levels of certificates. The first level is the "Meritorious Budget Award," which requires the entity to meet a very specific list of criteria defined by CSMFO. The second level is the "Operating Budget Excellence Award," which requires that the organization meet even higher criteria which effectively enhances the usability of the document. In preparing the ensuing Fiscal Year Capital Budget, staff has once again followed CSMFO's criteria. This document will be submitted to the CSMFO for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget award program. California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Certificate of Award Capital Budget Excellence Award Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Presented to the City of Temecula I meeting the criteria established to achieve a CSMFO Award in Budgeting. January 29, 2024 Rich Lee 2023 CSMFO President James Russell -Field, Chair Recognition Commiuee Dedicated to Excellence in Municipal Financial Reporting 17 Zak Schwank Council Member District 5 Isaac Garibay Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Temecula Citizens Brendan Kalfus James Stewart Mayor Pro Tern Mayor District 3 District 4 Kevin Hawkins Assistant City Manager ,�*,j Michael Heslin Director of Information Systems Aaron Adams City Manager L 9 1 Jessica Alexander Council Member District 2 Peter Thorson City Attorney Betsy Lowrey I Luke Watson Assistant to the Deputy City Manager/Director City Manager of Community Development Erica Russo Patrick Thomas Director of Director of Public Community Services Works/City Engineer r& O r\ I Vacant Council Member District 1 ire Randi Johl Jennifer Hennessy Director of Legislative Director of Finance Affairs/City Clerk i Chris Durham John Crater Captain/Temecula Division Chief/Temecula Police Chief Fire Chief R The Heart of Southern Gafio—a Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF LEVEL RANKING AND FUTURE YEARS PROJECTS LEVEL I: The project is urgent and must be completed as soon as feasible. Failure to address the project may impact the health, safety, or welfare of the community or have a potential significant impact on the financial well- being of the City. The project must be initiated or financial opportunity losses may result. LEVEL II: The project is important and addressing it is necessary. The project impacts safety, law enforcement, health, welfare, economic base, quality of life, and has been identified as a priority in the Quality of Life Master Plan. LEVEL III: The project will enhance quality of life and will provide a benefit to the community. Completion of the project will improve the community by providing cultural, recreational, and/or aesthetic value, or is deemed as a necessary improvement to a public facility. FUTUREYEARS PROJECTS: The project will be an improvement to the community, but does not necessarily need to be completed within a five-year capital improvement program time frame. 19 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program PARAMETERS FOR CIP BUDGET COST ESTIMATES Estimated Total Project Administration Costs Estimated Cost Property Zoning Costs Percentage (vacant, per sq. ft.) Over $10 Million 7% Industrial Property $20.00 $5 Million to $10 Million 10% Commercial/Retail/Office $40.00 $1 Million to $5 Million 15% Commercial — Old Town $110.00 $500,000 to $1 Million 20% Rural/Residential $2.00 - $5.00 $100,000 to $500,000 25% Flood Plain $1.50 Less than $100,000 30% Multi -Family Residential $9.00 Single Family Residential $6.00 Estimated Total Design Costs Building Type Estimated Cost Construction Costs Percentage Over $10 Million 7% Assembly Use Building (persq. ft.) $450 $5 Million to $10 Million 10% Office (per sq. ft.) $400 $1 Million to $5 Million 15% Multi -Family Housing (persq. ft.) $300 $500,000 to $1 Million 18% Community Parks (per acre) $500,000 $100,000 to $500,000 20% Neighborhood Parks (per acre) $400,000 Less than $100,000 25% Parameters for the CIP cost estimates are adjusted annually to reflect current economic conditions and cost of living increases. Future projected cost appropriations are increased by 2% inflationary index. Future operating and maintenance costs are estimated based on the life of the project to maintain the project life with a 2% yearly inflator, where applicable, and are included in the City of Temecula annual operating budget. 20 Alk R The Heart of Southern Califo—a wne Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES Affordable Housing Fund The Affordable Housing fund contains the assets as well as loan and rental income from the former Redevelopment Agency which have been transferred to the City of Temecula. Assembly Bill 2766 (AB 2766) State funds that are available to implement programs and projects that reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. Capital Financing Funding available through financing proceeds to be used for Capital Improvements. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides funds through the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) for local community development, housing activities, and public services. The primary objective of the CDBG Program is the development of viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities primarily focused on low- and moderate -income persons and neighborhoods. Community Facilities District (CFD) A tool that allows the City to construct desired and authorized public improvements with costs of the projects paid for by the benefitted properties within the boundaries of a designated area. The costs are then financed through the issuance of bonds payable over a period of years. Community Reinvestment Program The fund was established to provide various community grants to support the local economy in its recover from the COVID-19 global pandemic. Department of Water Resources (DWR) Proposition 84 Funding made available from the State of California Department of Water Resources funding from the Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006. 2015 Proposition 84 Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Implementation Grant, California Public Resources Code Section 75026 of Divisions 26.5 of the California Water Code (CWC). Development Impact Fees (DIF) Fees generated by development applications to offset the effect of development to include infrastructure, fire protection, public facilities and services, libraries, roads, schools, parks, traffic signal mitigation and open space/public art. Fees are determined by the cost of the project at the time of application. Facilities Replacement Fund This Fund was established to accumulate resources necessary to replacement future Facilities systems, equipment and fixtures. 21 Alk R The Heart of Southern Califo—a wne Country Gas Tax Fund City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES The City maintains this fund to account for the Highway User's Tax revenues received from the State of California under Sections 2013, 2105, 2107, and 2107.5 of the Streets and Highways Code General Fund City General Funds retained for capital improvement projects. Highway Safety Improvement Program The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), codified as Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.0 §148), is a core federal -aid program to States for the purpose of achieving a significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. Highway Bridge Program This program is funded by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and authorized by United States Code (USC) Title 23, Section 144. The purpose of the Program is to replace or rehabilitate public highway bridges over waterways, other topographical barriers, other highways, or railroads when the State and the Federal Highway Administration determine that a bridge is significantly important and is unsafe because of structural deficiencies, physical deterioration, or functional obsolescence. Infrastructure for Rebuilding America (INFRA) The INFRA program provides dedicated, discretionary funding for projects that address critical issues facing our nation's highways and bridges. Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) Grant This grant program is provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). LEAP provides one-time grant funding to cities and counties to update their planning documents and implement process improvements that will facilitate the acceleration of housing production and help local governments prepare for their 6th cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Measure A (Local Streets and Roads) Riverside County's half -cent sales tax to fund transportation projects to improve local streets and roads, major highways, commuter rail, and public transit throughout Riverside County. Measure S Pursuant to Ordinance 16-06, on November 8, 2016, the people of Temecula approved a local 1% Transactions and Use Tax, effective on April 1, 2017, to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local paramedic, police, fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior, disabled services, improve freeway interchanges, reduce traffic and provide for other general services. Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC) The MSRC is the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee, established under state law (AB 2766) whose sole mission is to fund projects that reduce air pollution from motor vehicles within the South Coast Air District in Southern California. 22 Alk R The Heart of Southern Califo—a wne Country Public Art Fund City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES Public Artwork enhances the quality of life for individuals living and working in the Temecula. This fund was adopted by City Council for design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance and insurance of public artwork displayed on City property; offering of performing arts programs on City property for the community; and art education programs on City property for the community (provided, however, that not more than five percent of the fund's annual budget shall be used for this purpose). Quimby The City's park -in -lieu or park development fee is assessed under provisions of the Subdivision Map Act which allows the City to require the dedication of land or the payment of a fee in lieu of land to be used for the purchase (or development) of park property. Reimbursements/Other Funding made available from other agencies or sources on a reimbursement, donation, and contribution basis. The actual agreement states the conditions of monies specific to a particular project. Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient, Transportation Equity Act - Legacy for Users (SAFETEA— LU) Signed into law on August 10, 200S, and provides for highways, highway safety, and public transportation to improve safety, reduce traffic congestion, and other activities related to solving transportation problems. This new program takes off where STP, TEA-21, and ISTEA left off. Senate Bill 1/Road Repair and Accountability Act (RMRA)/Active Transportation Program (ATP) The State of California imposes per gallon excise and sales taxes on fuel sales, as well as registration taxes on motor vehicles, for allocation to agencies for transportation purposes. In 2017, the State established the Road Repair and Accountability Act (RMRA) to allocate a greater share of additional monies for transportation purposes. Senate Bill 2 SB 2 (2017) is part of a $1S billion housing package aimed at addressing the state's housing shortage and high housing costs. Specifically, SB 2 established a permanent source of revenue intended to increase the affordable housing stock in California. The PGP is intended for the preparation, adoption, and implementation of plans that streamline housing approvals and accelerate housing production. Senate Bill 621 Represents a regional organization made up of tribal governments primarily within Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations (TASIN) member tribes contribute a percentage of their gaming revenues to the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund (SDF), as established by the State Legislature, to offset the impacts of Indian gaming on public services and infrastructure. 23 Alk R The Heart of Southern Califo—a wne Country Senate Bill 821 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES B 821, the Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program, is provided through the Transportation Development Act (TDA), funded through a % cent of the general sales tax collected statewide. The TDA provides two major sources of funding for public transportation: the Local Transportation Fund (LTF) and the State Transit Assistance (STA). The LTF provides funding for essential transit and commuter rail services, SB 821 and planning. Each year, two percent of the LTF revenue is made available for use on bicycle and pedestrian facility projects through the SB 821 program. Service Level C Service Level C Fund reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance throughout the City. Service Level C assesses only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and are separated into 32 zones. The rate levels for Zones 6 and 29, are subject to a Consumer Price Index -Urban Consumers (CPI-U) annual inflator while all other rate levels will not increase. Zones 30-32 will not be assessed, as the property owners have elected to have the landscaping maintained by the respective Homeowner's Associations (HOAs). State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the biennial five-year plan adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for future allocations of certain state transportation funds for state highway improvements, intercity rail, and regional highway and transit improvements. State law requires the Commission to update the STIP biennially, in even -numbered years, with each new STIP adding two new years to prior programming commitments. State Highway Operation Protection Program & Minor Program (SHOPP) State Highway System's program that funds repair and preservations, emergency repairs, safety improvements and some highway operational improvements. Street Maintenance Fund This fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of streets and roads throughout the City. Surface Transportation Program (STP) Federal funds available for local agencies to improve the safety and efficiency of the local transportation system. Sustainable Communities Program The Sustainable Communities Program is a key Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) initiative for implementing the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), combining Integrated Land Use assistance for integrated land use and transportation planning with Green Region assistance aimed at local sustainability and Active Transportation assistance for bicycle and pedestrian planning efforts. 24 Alk R The Heart of Southern Califo—a wne Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program DESCRIPTION OF REVENUE SOURCES Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds Series 2017A and 2017B As of January 31, 2012, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula has been dissolved and the City has elected to become the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency will be responsible for the winding down of the remaining activities of the dissolved Redevelopment Agency. These remaining activities include completing affordable housing and infrastructure projects that are funded with tax allocation bonds issued by the former redevelopment agency. The Series 2017A and 2017B Refunding Bonds were issued in 2017 to refinance 2002, 2006, 2007, 2010, and 2011 Tax Allocation Bonds to provide financing for low and moderate income housing projects. The outstanding bonds will be repaid in full in 2038. Monies to pay bond debt service is requested from the State and disbursed by the County from the Trust Fund established to accumulate tax increment generated by the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency area. Technology Replacement Fund This fund is used for the replacements of computers, system Software and all other Information Technology equipment. TEAM Fund Expenditures reflect the transfer of funds to the Capital Improvement Program to fund an Electric Vehicle Charging Station project, lighting along Murrieta Creek and Sports Park Lighting upgrades. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Multi -jurisdictional development impact fee paid for by new development to provide the transportation infrastructure necessary to accommodate new development. Uptown Temecula new Streets In -Lieu Fees This fund was established in conjunction with the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee. The Specific Plan requires developers to dedicate right-of-way and construct new street improvements adjacent to or through their development sites. Developers within the Specific Plan who cannot contribute right-of-way and/or build new streets will be charged a new streets in -lieu fee. WRCOG-BEYOND Framework Fund Program Local assistance funding program for Economic Development and Sustainability Projects. 25 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program - Project List (Sorted by Account Number) 817 AH20-01 LAS HACIENDAS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT COMDV Housing 820 AH20-02 VINE CREEK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT COMDV Housing 827 AH22-01 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - OLD TOWN UNITS COMDV Housing AH23-01 UPTOWN TEMECULA AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITE COMDV Housing 703 CD18-01 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE COMDV Infrastructure 772 CD23-01 COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN COMDV Infrastructure CD24-01 OLD TOWN TEMECULA PARKLETS PROGRAM COMDV Infrastructure CD24-02 VACANT PARCEL CLEAN-UP AND BEAUTIFICATION COMDV Infrastructure 790 CM22-01 AUTO MALL WAYFINDING SIGNS CITY MGR Infrastructure 724 FN19-01 CITYWIDE FINANCIAL SYSTEM UPGRADE FIN Infrastructure 780 IT20-01 OLD TOWN SECURITY CAMERA & SOUND SYSTEM ITSS Infrastructure New TEMECULA DUCK POND SPILLWAY PROJECT PW Parks/Recreation NEW LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENTS ITSS Infrastructure (IT24-01) NEW LIBRARY ALTERNATE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER ITSS Infrastructure (IT24-02) ENHANCEMENTS NEW EMPIRE CREEK IMPROVEMENTS PW Parks/Recreation (PW23- 20) NEW NORTH GENERAL KEARNY STREET IMPROVEMENTS PW Circulation (PW24- 02) New 2 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE IV PW Circulation New 3 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD SEPARATED BIKE LANES PW Circulation NEW 4 SOUTH SIDE SENIOR CENTER FOR ACTIVE ADULTS PW Infrastructure 662 PW04-08 1-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE PW Circulation 187 PW05-13 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK CHANNEL SILT REMOVAL PW Parks/Recreation 747 PW06-09 TEMECULA PARK & RIDE PW Infrastructure 739 PW08-04 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRAIL PW Infrastructure EXTENSION 650 PW10-13 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - WINCHESTER RD PW Circulation 516 PW11-01 PECHANGA PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION PW Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds 153 PW13-09 LIBRARY PARKING - PHASE II PW Infrastructure 735 PW15-07 MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS PW Infrastructure 723 PW15-11 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION PW Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds 726 PW16-01 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 11 PW Circulation 26 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program - Project List (Sorted by Account Number) 648 PW16-05 MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AT OVERLAND PW Circulation 602 PW16-06 OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION COMMERCE CENTER PW Circulation 711 PW17-01 CITY SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM PW Infrastructure 694 PW17-15 OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE PW Infrastructure 696 PW17-16 SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN BOARDWALK ENHANCEMENT PW Infrastructure 535 PW17-17 YNEZ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II PW Circulation 688 PW17-18 CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION & LIGHT EMITTING PW Infrastructure DIODE (LED) RETROFIT 690 PW17-19 1-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE ENHANCED PW Infrastructure LANDSCAPING 692 PW17-21 MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER PW Infrastructure 521 PW17-25 DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION PW Circulation 689 PW17-29 RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT PW Infrastructure 114 PW18-03 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK RESTROOM EXPANSION & PW Parks/Recreation RENOVATION 550 PW18-05 FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE PW Infrastructure 605 PW18-11 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PARK & RIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS PW Circulation 612 PW18-16 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN PW Infrastructure IMPLEMENTATION 609 PW19-02 1-15 CONGESTION RELIEF PW Circulation 728 PW19-03 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III PW Circulation 732 PW19-04 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PHASE 11 - MARGARITA UNDER- PW Infrastructure CROSSING 125 PW19-05 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT TCSD Parks/Recreation 730 PW19-07 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) RENOVATIONS PW Infrastructure 610 PW19-09 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SYSTEM UPGRADE (Protected/Permissive PW Circulation Signal Heads) 518 PW19-10 PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure 720 PW19-11 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - TEMECULA CREEK SOUTH PW Infrastructure SIDE TRAIL 697 PW19-13 FIRE STATION 73 GYM/GARAGE FIRE Infrastructure 687 PW19-14 FIRE STATION 84 RENOVATION FIRE Infrastructure 524 PW19-15 CHERRY STREET EXTENSION & MURRIETA CREEK CROSSING PW Circulation 722 PW19-16 CITYWIDE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN PW Infrastructure 721 PW19-18 SIDEWALKS - DLR DRIVE PW Infrastructure 145 PW20-07 EAGLE SOAR SPLASH PAD CONTROL SYSTEM RENOVATION PW Parks/Recreation 781 PW20-09 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - MINI PUMP TRACK PW Infrastructure 783 PW20-11 OVERLAND DRIVE WIDENING PW Circulation 782 PW20-13 MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER ENHANCEMENT AND PW Infrastructure RENOVATION 27 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program - Project List (Sorted by Account Number) 604 PW20-14 NICOLAS ROAD EXTENSION & IMPROVEMENTS PW Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds 204 PW20-15 URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN PW Infrastructure 777 PW21-02 COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE COMDV Infrastructure 787 PW21-03 PICKLEBALL COURTS PW Parks/Recreation 206 PW21-04 RCWD RECYCLED WATER ACCELERATED RETROFIT PROGRAM PW Infrastructure 761 PW21-05 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - INFILL MINI PUMP TRACK PW Infrastructure 205 PW21-07 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER SPLASH PAD & SHADE PW Parks/Recreation STRUCTURES 771 PW21-08 MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER EMERGENCY GENERATOR PW Infrastructure 683 PW21-09 ELECTRIC VEHICLES CHARGING STATION PW Infrastructure 207 PW21-14 DOG PARK RENOVATION PW Parks/Recreation 788 PW21-15 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD PW Infrastructure 768 PW21-16 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - GREAT OAK TRAIL PW Infrastructure LIGHTING 793 PW22-05 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PW Infrastructure PARK TRAILS 223 PW22-06 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK HOCKEY RINK PW Parks/Recreation 222 PW22-07 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK SKATE PARK PW Parks/Recreation 796 PW22-08 MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL PW Infrastructure AREA 225 PW22-11 HARVESTON COMMUNITY PARK BUILDING RENOVATIONS PW Parks/Recreation AND EXPANSION 221 PW22-12 UPTOWN TEMECULA SPORTS PARK PW Parks/Recreation 224 PW22-14 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK PUMP TRACK SHADE PW Parks/Recreation STRUCTURE 786 PW22-15 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PW Circulation 797 PW23-01 DE PORTOLA ROAD / JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD ROUNDABOUT PW Circulation PROJECT 534 PW23-02 YNEZ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I PW Circulation PW23-03 SIDEWALKS - THIRD STREET PW Infrastructure 791 PW23-04 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PW Circulation 226 PW23-05 INFILL RECREATIONAL AMENITIES PW Parks/Recreation PW23-09 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE PW Infrastructure PW23-10 BIKE LANE UPGRADES - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure PW23-11 PEDESTRIAN RAMP UPGRADES - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure PW23-12 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE PW Infrastructure PHASE 2 - CITYWIDE 28 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program - Project List PW23-13 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SAFETY LIGHTS AND SIGNAL PW Infrastructure COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE- CITYWIDE 792 PW23-15 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS PW Circulation PW23-23 TEMECULA CREEK FENCING PW Infrastructure PWBM- BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PW Infrastructure 05 PWBV-24 INTERSTATE 15 CORRIDOR BRANDING AND VISIONING PW Infrastructure IMPROVEMENTS 670 PWFB-18 FLASHING BEACONS & SPEED ADVISORY SIGNS PW Circulation 127 PWFC-10 FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION & REPAIR PW Parks/Recreation 789 PWFO-21 FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS — CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure 701 PWFR-11 CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION PW Infrastructure 779 PWFS-08 CITY FACILITY SECURITY PW Infrastructure 620 PWMI-17 MOTOR CAR PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS PW Circulation 622 PWMP- MEDIANS & PARKWAYS - CITYWIDE PW Circulation 09 785 PWNT-25 NICOLAS ROAD MULTI -USE TRAIL EXTENSION PW Infrastructure 766 PWOT-03 SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS PW Infrastructure PWOT- SIXTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS PW Infrastructure 03- 01/PW22 -16 155 PWPE-07 PARK RESTROOMS RENOVATIONS, EXPANSION AND PW Parks/Recreation AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS PWPE- VAIL RANCH PARK RESTROOMS PW Parks/Recreation 07-02/ PW23-06 PWPE- LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOMS PW Parks/Recreation 07-03/ PW23-18 120 PWPG-13 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT & SAFETY PW Parks/Recreation SURFACING 130 PWPI-14 PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PW Parks/Recreation 655 PWPR-01 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE PW Circulation PWSD-23 STORM DRAIN PIPE LINING PW Infrastructure 113 PWSL-12 SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING - LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) PW Parks/Recreation CONVERSION 141 PWSR-15 SPORTS COURT RESURFACING PW Parks/Recreation 708 PWSW- SIDEWALKS - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure 02 PWSW- SIDEWALKS-PAUBA ROAD PW Infrastructure 02-02 29 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program Capital Improvement Program - Project List 704 PWTC-20 MEDIANS & TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure 680 PWTE-19 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - PW Circulation CITYWIDE 143 PWTP-16 TEMECULA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TES) POOL RENOVATION PW Infrastructure 682 PWTS-06 TRAFFIC SIGNAL - INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE PW Circulation 776 PWUG- UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING - CITYWIDE PW Infrastructure 04 30 Adk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Revenue Summary 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost City Funds Affordable Housing 9,617,578 5,091,359 Assembly Bill 2766 429,991 534,420 143,830 151,664 Capital Financing 6,405,000 Community Reinvestment Program 6,310,000 115,000 Contribution of Land 1,861,000 Facilities Replacement Fund 1,746,234 1,527,126 1,000,000 1,000,000 Gas Tax 1,200,000 General Fund 19,809,350 766,443 500,000 500,000 Measure A 25,125,288 5,818,512 2,095,547 2,872,160 Measure S 38,964,184 44,583,762 8,306,726 8,407,355 RMRA - Road Repair & Accountability Act 10,309,528 3,408,732 2,810,553 2,827,154 Service Level C - Zone 28 48,300 451,700 Street Maintenance Fund 3,600,000 2,937,307 TEAM - Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset Fund 115,807 683,122 Technology Replacement Fund 763,534 Uptown Temecula New Streets In Lieu Fee 500,857 City Funds Total 117,371,260 72,300,567 17,908,963 15,758,333 Community Facility District Funds CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 CFD 03-01 (Crowne Hill) 502,211 CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 38,413,523 8,331,133 CFD 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 837,236 27,808 CFD 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch -Phase II) 6,722,850 Community Facility Districts Total 40,758,810 15,081,791 Development Impact Fee Funds DIF-Corporate Facilities 1,519,144 82,943 388,651 DIF-Fire Protection Facilities 551,584 24,000 DIF-Library Facilities 940,000 DIF-Open Space & Trails 820,383 1,632,908 125,000 350,000 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 3,750,416 2,524,149 1,014,974 2,657,795 31 162,554 174,225 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,312,000 1,889,160 988,660 2,385,760 2,883,697 2,941,371 14,708, 186,595 1,783, 6,405, 6,425, 1,861, 1,000,000 8,273, 1,200, 21,575, 1,492,000 40,604, 788,660 104,425, 3,000,198 28,181, 500, 6,537, 6,346,911 8,390,516 6,467,453 502,21 46,744,65 865,04 6,722,85 1,990,73 575,58 940,00 2,928,29 9,947,33 Adk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Funding Source DIF-Police Facilities DIF-Quimby DIF-Street Improvements DIF-Traffic Signals Development Impact Fees Total Federal Grants BTA - Bicycle Transportation Account CDBG - Community Development Block Grant CDBG - Community Development Block Grant - COVID CMAQ-Congestion Mitigation Air Quality HBP-Highway Bridge Program HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program INFRA - Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Grant SAFETEA-LU - Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation STP (RCTC) - Surface Transportation Program Federal Grants Total Reimbursements/Other County AD 159 Developer Contribution Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA Reimbursements Reimbursements/Other Settlement Proceeds Reimbursements/Other Total RPTTF-Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund SARDA Total City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Revenue Summary 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected 1,232,369 25,744 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 3,170,029 3,810,563 868,109 500,000 12,208,875 2,802,633 1,939,172 806,000 5,493,331 1,900,925 239,753 639,667 375,000 24,602,141 11,670,277 6,346,573 4,130,795 6,493,331 100,000 Total 2028-29 Project Projected Cost 55,000 2,262,11 500,000 8,848,70 23,250,01 300,000 3,455,34 855,000 54,198,11 223,311 223,31 1,202,960 1,441,571 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 4,269,53 40,993 622,675 663,66 523,539 51,906 3,879,555 15,377,519 19,832,51 1,488,771 2,294,199 2,206,730 5,989,70 1,537,255 48,462,745 50,000,00 1,439,839 1,602,360 3,042,19 12,279,728 696,272 12,976,00 18,736,396 55,171,728 6,411,285 325,000 15,702,519 325,000 325,000 96,996,92 4,008,270 4,008, 682,514 10,900,565 4,853,630 16,436, 6,700,000 850,000 7,550, 9,280,609 4,034,884 13,315, 1,190,582 1,190, 500,000 500, 18,353,705 19,793,719 4,853,630 43,001, 750,000 750, 750,000 750, 32 Adk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Revenue Summary 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost State/Local Grants Beyond Grant Grants MSRC-Mobile Source Air Review Committee Grant Senate Bill 1 - Active Transportation Program Senate Bill 621 Senate Bill 821 SHOPP - State Highway Operation & Protection Program STIP-Surface Transportation Improvement Program State/Local Grants Total Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fund (TUMF) TUMF TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) TUMF (RCTC) TUMF (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fund (TUMF) Total 19,85 14 1,438,00 5,825,05 6,795,00 21,087,23 4,924,056 141,000 4,431,537 160,000 362,600 1,250,000 47,600,000 58,869,193 4,547,453 13,303,781 17,851,234 5,000,000 5,000,000 1,165,077 1,165,077 19,85 14,6 3 1 52 1,43 10,37 6,79 35,55 33 1 Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program CIP MAJOR REVENUE SOURCES Capital Project Funding Sources TUMF , 54,161,598, 8% State/Local Grants , 79,660,033, 13% Reimbursements, 43,001,054, 7% Federal Grants , 96,996,928, 15% De Impact Fees, 54,198,117, 9 % PROJECTED REVENUES: City Funds , 244, 544,003 , 39 % Facility Districts 55,840,601, 9% $629,1525335 34 Capital Project Expenditure Summary Project Name Prior Years _Ir Actuals 2023-24 2024-25 Amended Proposed Circulation Protects Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes 125,000 Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements 7,008,270 4,853,630 Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing 528,801 470,499 67,172 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout 9,659 1,440,341 753,000 Diaz Road Expansion 1,264,479 10,049,411 2,122,624 Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs 261,743 77,541 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 42,502,699 96,078,647 170,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 3,076,835 2,199,959 5,280,000 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements -Phase IV 1-15 Congestion Relief 1,529,803 7,728,907 I-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 49,321,491 1,770,407 Medians & Parkways - Citywide 666,838 228,000 Motor Car Parkway Improvements 750,000 Murrieta Creek Bridge At Overland 1,397,277 2,356,088 3,979,555 North General Kearny Street Improvements 557,337 450,000 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center 7,979,319 338,578 Overland Drive Widening 384,215 1,608,805 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 46,327,342 4,408,732 3,948,553 Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation 117,928 2,782,072 Rancho California Road Median Improvements 20,782 897,218 40,000 Traffic Signal - Equipment Enhancement Program - Citywide 1,107,408 1,379,381 260,000 Traffic Signal - Installation - Citywide 1,865,688 561,995 180,000 Traffic Signal - Park & Ride Access Improvements 1,963,365 247,531 Traffic Signal - System Upgrade 82,848 704,052 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase 1 42,759 2,907,241 1,046,172 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase II _ 347,255 160,798,532 145,801,010 24,025,706 Housing Proiects Habitat for Humanity Old Town Units 1,261,000 Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project 7,947,784 2,182,216 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site 2,300,000 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project 6,710,000 Wing Total 7,947,784 12,453,216 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 350,000 3,339,618 34,366,730 38,772,8 1,966,000 4,169,0 3,614,478 17,050,9 32,000 32,000 403,2 138,751,3 200,000 200,000 2,850,000 37,890,000 51,696,7 181,400,000 181,400,0 9,258,7 51,091,8 894,8 750,0 20,870,850 28,603,7 500,000 1,507,3 8,317,8 2,937,307 4,930,3 4,051,154 4,195,697 4,342,371 4,492,198 71,766,0 2,900,0 40,000 2,897,000 3,895,0 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 3,786,7 375,000 300,000 3,282,6 2,210,8 786,9 3,996,1 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 4,806,3 7,399,154 32,024,977 16,027,325 261,290,035 647,366,7 1,261,0 10,130,0 2,300,0 6,710,0 20,401,0 35 Project Infrastructure Projects American With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide Bike Lane and Trail Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails Bike Lane And Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide Bridge Maintenance City Facilities Rehabilitation City Facility Security City Security Camera System Citywide Drainage Master Plan Citywide Financial System Upgrade Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations Community Wildfire Protection Plan Comprehensive General Plan Update Electric Vehicles Charging Station Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage Fire Station 84 Training Room Renovation 1-15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping Interstate 15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements Library Alternate Emergency Operations Center Enhancements Library Technology Enhancements Margarita Recreation Center Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement And Renovation Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide Murrieta Creek Improvements Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension Old Town Parking Structure Old Town Security Camera & Sound System Old Town Temecula Parklets Program Pavement Management Program Update Capital Project Expenditure Summary 178, 59, 450, 3,466,53 73,22 3,333,54 260,84 616,80 7,970,75 485, 214. 304,5 8,387,27 216,31 107, 887,387 200,000 84,419 780,300 2,040,867 572,562 274,500 488,160 1,527,127 176,774 1,158,238 464,153 759,909 32,552 5,965,489 331,905 1,724,828 277,757 71,739 510,583 395,815 1,748,826 3,075,843 200,000 4,214,234 19,628 1,037,065 621,142 619,103 978,857 1,500,000 747,577 174,181 450,000 375,000 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 143,830 151,664 1,307,112 174,225 24,208 8,593,350 488,160 488,160 1,030,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 39,000 4,852,063 500,000 500,000 407,000 317,000 115,000 3,419,877 635,798 71,812 700,000 240,000 250,000 836,867 125,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 2, 2, 9, 2, 36 Capital Project Expenditure Summary Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades - Citywide Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade - Citywide RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing Sidewalks - Citywide Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements Sidewalks - Pauba Road Sidewalks - Third Street Sixth Street Improvements South Side Senior Center Storm Drain Pipe Lining Temecula Creek Fencing Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation Traffic Signal - Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade Phase 2 - Citywide Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade- Citywide Urban Forest Management Plan Utility Undergrounding - Citywide Vacant Parcel Clean-up and Beautification Infrastructure Tot Parks/Recreation Protects Children's Museum Enhancement Project Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures Dog Park Renovation Empire Creek Improvements Harveston Community Park Building Renovation and Expansion Infill Recreational Amenities Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms Park Restrooms Renovations, Expansion And Americans With Disabilities Act Parks Improvement Program Pickleball Courts Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park Sports Court Resurfacing City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 275,000 839,879 166,321 127,802 97,198 7,185,778 147,817 737,922 4,862,201 1,083,646 334,146 1,660,801 167,783 957,124 972,900 452,326 520,000 100,000 532,550 532,550 1,065,100 500,000 61,481 73,620 572,700 273,704 245,296 369,503 2,886,397 346,404 29,826 102,353 142,021 360,000 9,640,1861 45,744,852 8,803,572 11,764,974 11,629,122 3,431,145 313,257 231,833 277,433 2,224,715 157,894 882,106 115,000 523,948 400,000 4,343,659 63,745 2,686,255 347,677 4,126 395,874 945,000 362,930 241,880 1,137,919 2,863,532 864,841 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 256,718 3,044,160 175,000 3,918,678 2,238,971 500,000 500,000 125,935 1,959, 065 1,535,406 41,051 78,949 1,326,285 150,203 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 100,000 255,990 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 7,333 5,600 1,417 1,828 957 972 972 100 2,130 500 135 572 519 3,255 376 244 360 132,859 1,155 5,267 3,097 1,307 3,475 7,657 4, 37 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Project Expenditure Summary Project Project Name Sports Field Lighting - Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Actuals 1,065,417 Amended 1,164,583 Proposed Projected 500,000 Projected Projected Projected Cost 500,000 3,230,000 Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project 200,000 200,000 Uptown Temecula Sports Park 121,951 2,198,049 80,000 12,547,822 14,947,822 Vail Ranch Park Restrooms 945,000 377,930 1,322,930 11,093,771 23,560,858 6,668,9431ff 1,050,000 17,841,481 950,000 ML Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Butterfield Stage Road Extension 39,886,327 1,520,702 41,407,029 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 11,784 22,172,876 22,184,660 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation 865,044 865,044 Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Total 40,763,155 23,693,578 64,456,733 Project Type Number of Projects Total Project Cost Circulation 26 647,366,739 Housing 4 20,401,000 Infrastructure 58 132,859,106 Parks/Rec 22 62,115,054 CFD Funded 3 64,456,733 Chi Aft Tv:e �aea:x of $o�_ Cap=i City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY PROJECT TYPE Capital Project Expenditures by Type CFD-Funded, 64,456,733 , 7% Parks/Recreation, 62,115,054 , 7% Infrastructure, 132,859,106 , 14% i Housing, 20,401,000 , 2% Circulation, 647,366,739 , 70% PROJECTED EXPENDITURES: $927,198,632 39 Tk� fs-h-CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Assembly Bill 2766 Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide 256,463 84,420 143,830 151,664 162,554 174,225 186,595 1,159,751 Bike Lane And Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail 67,845 0 0 0 0 0 0 67,845 Electric Vehicles Charging Station 47,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 47,000 Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension 450,000 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 58,683 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,683 Project Funding 429,991 534,420 143,830 151,664 162,554 174,225 186,595 1,783,279 Revenue Projection 821,046 155,675 158,789 161,964 165,204 168,508 171,878 Available Funding 391,055 12,310 27,269 37,569 40,219 34,501 19,784 Capital Financing Margarita Recreation Center 6,405,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,405,000 Project Funding 6,405,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,405,000 Revenue Projection 6,405,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Facility Districts Butterfield Stage Road Extension 38,401,739 635,200 0 0 0 0 0 39,036,939 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 1,005,840 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,005,840 I-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 502,211 0 0 0 0 0 0 502,211 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 11,784 14,418,783 0 0 0 0 0 14,430,567 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation 837,236 27,808 0 0 0 0 0 865,044 Project Funding 40,758,810 15,081,791 0 0 0 0 0 55,840,601 Revenue Projection 58,620,323 0 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 17,861,513 2,779,722 2,779,722 2,779,722 2,779,722 2,779,722 2,779,722 40 Tk� fs-h-CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Community Reinvestment Program Old Town Temecula Parklets Program 0 450,000 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 Sixth Street Improvements 0 0 115,000 0 0 0 0 115,000 Temecula Creek Fencing 0 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 Vacant Parcel Clean-up and City Beautification 0 360,000 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project 0 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 4,000,000 Project Funding 0 6,310,000 115,000 0 0 0 0 6,425,000 Revenue Projection 0 6,310,000 115,000 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Development Impact Fees (DIF) DIF - Corporate Facilities City Facilities Rehabilitation 250,000 0 30,000 0 0 0 0 280,000 Citywide Security Cameras 752,087 0 0 0 0 0 0 752,087 Dog Park Renovation 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 100,000 Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage 0 0 43,651 0 0 0 0 43,651 Fire Station 84 Training Room Renovation 0 0 85,000 0 0 0 0 85,000 Murrieta Creek Improvements 0 0 130,000 0 0 0 0 130,000 Old Town Security Camera & Sound System 517,057 82,943 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 Project Funding 1,519,144 82,943 388,651 0 0 0 0 1,990,738 Revenue Projection 1,740,817 231,226 133,649 306,836 229,547 264,718 128,714 Available Funding 221,673 369,956 114,953 421,789 651,335 916,054 1,044,767 DIF - Fire Facilities Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage 0 103,336 24,000 0 0 0 0 127,336 Fire Station 84 Training Room Renovation 0 448,248 0 0 0 0 0 448,248 Project Funding 0 551,584 24,000 0 0 0 0 575,584 Revenue Projection 81,110 164,051 88,187 242,426 161,475 203,376 128,143 Available Funding 81,110 (306,423) (242,236) 189 161,664 365,040 493,183 41 Tk� fs-h-CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source Funding Source - Project Name DIF - Library Library Alternate Emergency Operations Center Enhancements Library Technology Enhancements Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Funding DIF - Open Space & Trails Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Funding DIF - Parks & Recreation Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails Children's Museum Enhancement Project Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations Margarita Recreation Center Pickleball Courts Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park South Side Senior Center Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation Urban Forest Management Plan Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Funding City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 0 0 700,000 0 0 0 0 700,000 0 0 240,000 0 0 0 0 240,000 0 0 940,000 0 0 0 0 940,000 1,714,182 367,321 414,379 426,831 228,910 213,167 208,551 1,714,182 2,081,503 1,555,882 1,982,713 2,211,623 2,424,791 2,633,342 72,177 0 0 0 0 0 0 72,177 59,133 70,000 0 0 0 0 0 129,133 0 0 125,000 350,000 0 0 0 475,000 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 389,073 0 0 0 0 0 389,073 1,562,908 0 0 0 0 0 1,562,908 820,383 1,632,908 125,000 350,000 0 0 0 2,928,291 1,783,165 301,589 392,501 451,065 157,752 47,771 43,755 962,782 (368,537) (101,037) 28 157,780 205,552 249,306 0 930,867 0 0 0 0 0 930,867 145,090 0 0 0 0 0 0 145,090 1,521,208 400,000 0 2,457,795 0 0 0 4,379,003 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 256,718 1,193,282 0 0 0 0 0 1,450,000 1,040,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,040,000 0 0 1,014,974 0 0 0 0 1,014,974 100,000 100,000 0 0 0 100,000 100,000 135,100 0 0 0 0 0 0 135,100 52,300 0 0 0 0 0 0 52,300 3,750,416 2,524,149 1,014,974 2,657,795 0 0 0 9,947,334 6,171,661 1,034,667 1,346,588 1,547,496 541,222 163,896 150,115 2,421,2451 931,763 1,263,376 153,078 694,300 858,196 1,008,311 42 Tk� fs-h- CC hf W- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source Funding Source - Project Name DIF - Police Facilities Citywide Security Cameras Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide Margarita Recreation Center Project Fundin@ Revenue Projection Available Funding DIF - Quimby Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations Harveston Community Park Building Renovation and Expansion Infill Recreational Amenities Parks Improvement Program Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink Uptown Temecula Sports Park Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Fundin@ City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 1,121,113 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,121,113 0 0 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 1,004,000 111,256 25,744 0 0 0 0 0 137,000 1,232,369 25,744 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 2,262,113 1,240,434 230,240 194,802 317,456 125,773 104,371 53,954 8,065 212,561 363 820 1,592 5,963 4,917 0 690,000 0 0 0 0 0 690,000 2,353,952 1,096,640 0 0 0 0 0 3,450,592 0 750,000 347,677 0 0 0 0 1,097,677 4,126 395,874 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 440,000 0 0 0 500,000 0 500,000 1,440,000 0 0 520,432 0 0 0 0 520,432 121,951 878,049 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 3,170,029 3,810,563 868,109 0 500,000 0 500,000 8,848,701 6,124,5871 1,389,690 1,055,783 591,945 8,835 8,835 0 2,954,5581 533,685 721,359 1,313,304 822,139 830,974 330,974 43 Tk� fs-h- CC hf W- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source Funding Source - Project Name DIF - Street Improvements De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout Diaz Road Expansion French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II Medians & Parkways - Citywide Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide Murrieta Creek Bridge At Overland Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center Overland Drive Widening Rancho California Road Median Improvements Ynez Road Improvements - Phase I Ynez Road Improvements - Phase 11 Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Funding DIF - Traffic Signals Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs Traffic Signal - Equipment Enhancement Program - Citywide Traffic Signal - Installation - Citywide Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade - Citywide Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Funding Development Impact Fee Total Project Funding Development Impact Fee Total Revenue Projectior Development Impact Fee Total Available Funding City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 9,659 640,341 753,000 806,000 0 0 0 2,209,000 590 0 0 0 0 0 0 590 75,360 0 0 0 0 0 0 75,360 854,839 39,999 0 0 0 0 0 894,838 40,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 40,000 2,010,960 166,960 100,000 0 5,493,331 0 0 7,771,251 8,082,475 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,082,475 452,000 1,541,020 0 0 0 0 0 1,993,020 20,782 690,018 40,000 0 0 0 0 750,800 42,759 (3,509) 1,046,172 0 0 0 0 1,085,422 619,451 (272,196) 0 0 0 0 0 347,255 12,208,875 2,802,633 1,939,172 806,000 5,493,331 0 0 23,250,011 15,204,599 1,696,681 1,006,441 2,770,651 2,654,061 2,570,087 373,352 2,995,724 1,889,772 957,042 2,921,693 82,423 2,652,510 3,025,862 0 81,284 0 0 0 0 0 0 81,284 519,831 21,957 0 0 0 0 0 541,788 1,299,810 82,873 180,000 0 375,000 0 300,000 2,237,683 0 134,923 459,667 0 0 0 0 594,590 1,900,925 239,753 639,667 0 375,000 0 300,000 3,455,345 1,900,925 280,734 183,693 416,118 506,260 496,920 52,850 0 40,981 (414,993) 1,125 132,385 629,305 382,155 24,602,141 11,670,277 6,346,573 4,130,795 6,493,331 100,000 855,000 54,198,117 35,961,480 5,696,199 4,816,021 7,070,824 4,613,835 4,073,141 1,139,435 11,359,339 5,385,261 3,854,710 6,794,738 4,915,243 8,888,384 9,172,819 44 Tk� fs-h- CC hf W- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Facilities Replacement Fund City Facilities Rehabilitation 1,466,540 1,527,126 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,993,666 Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement And Renovation 279,694 0 0 0 0 0 0 279,694 Project Funding 1,746,234 1,527,126 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 8,273,360 Revenue Projection 2,398,367 2,550,000 2,500,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 Available Funding 652,133 1,675,007 3,175,007 3,425,007 3,675,007 3,925,007 4,175,007 General Fund City Facilities Rehabilitation 1,750,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,750,000 Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit 2,503,311 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,503,311 Comprehensive General Plan Update 1,000,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 2,400,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 4,236,174 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,236,174 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 1-15 Congestion Relief 1,542,267 366,443 0 0 0 0 0 1,908,710 Murrieta Creek Improvements 135,858 0 0 0 0 0 0 135,858 Old Town Parking Structure 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center 235,422 0 0 0 0 0 0 235,422 Parks Improvement Program 1,003,059 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,003,059 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 5,692,614 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,692,614 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 78,920 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,920 Sidewalks - Citywide 375,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 375,000 Traffic Signal - Park & Ride Access Improvements 226,725 0 0 0 0 0 0 226,725 Project Funding 19,809,350 766,443 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 21,575,793 Revenue Projection 19,809,350 766,443 500,000 500,000 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Tk� fs-h- CC hf W- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Grants - Federal American With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation 134,574 602,947 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 2,362,521 Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide 0 224,550 0 0 0 0 0 224,550 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade 771,019 437,181 0 0 0 0 0 1,208,200 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 1,537,255 50,065,105 0 0 0 0 0 51,602,360 I-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 13,719,567 696,272 0 0 0 0 0 14,415,839 Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement And Renovation 218,959 838,625 0 0 0 0 0 1,057,584 Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area 40,993 622,675 0 0 0 0 0 663,668 Murrieta Creek Bridge At Overland 523,539 51,906 3,879,555 0 15,377,519 0 0 19,832,519 Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades - Citywide 0 225,000 0 0 0 0 0 225,000 Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade - Citywide 717,753 190,447 0 0 0 0 0 908,200 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 223,311 0 0 0 0 0 0 223,311 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements 849,426 0 0 0 0 0 0 849,426 Traffic Signal - Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade Phase 2 - Citywide 0 492,930 0 0 0 0 0 492,930 Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade - Citywide 0 234,580 2,206,730 0 0 0 0 2,441,310 Traffic Signal - System Upgrade 0 489,510 0 0 0 0 0 489,510 Project Funding 18,736,397 55,171,729 6,411,285 325,000 15,702,519 325,000 325,000 96,996,930 Revenue Projection 18,736,397 55,171,729 6,411,285 325,000 15,702,519 325,000 325,000 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grants - State & Local Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide 19,857 0 0 0 0 0 0 19,857 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 0 378,000 0 0 0 0 0 378,000 Comprehensive General Plan Update 310,000 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 810,000 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout 0 800,000 0 0 0 0 0 800,000 Dog Park Renovation 0 447,126 0 0 0 0 0 447,126 Electric Vehicles Charging Station 0 141,000 0 0 0 0 0 141,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 0 47,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 47,600,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 5,000,000 46 Tk� fs—h—CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 1-15 Congestion Relief 0 1,250,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,250,000 1-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 14,446,520 160,000 0 0 0 0 0 14,606,520 Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator 185,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 185,000 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 829,463 2,929,537 0 0 0 0 0 3,759,000 Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing 0 1,502,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,502,000 Sidewalks - Pauba Road 0 362,600 0 0 0 0 0 362,600 Urban Forest Management Plan 0 323,930 0 0 0 0 0 323,930 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase 1 0 2,475,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,475,000 Project Funding 15,790,840 58,869,193 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 79,660,033 Revenue Projection 15,790,840 58,869,193 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Housing French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase 111 1,669,794 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,669,794 Habitat for Humanity Old Town Units 0 1,261,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,261,000 Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project 7,947,784 1,681,359 0 0 0 0 0 9,629,143 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site 0 1,300,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project 0 2,710,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,710,000 Project Funding 9,617,578 6,952,359 0 0 0 0 0 16,569,937 Revenue Projection 9,617,578 6,952,359 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 Tk� fs-h-CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Measure A Bridge Maintenance 0 488,160 0 488,160 0 488,160 0 1,464,480 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout 0 0 0 1,160,000 0 0 0 1,160,000 Diaz Road Expansion 134,628 3,440,372 957,547 0 0 0 0 4,532,547 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 1,627,914 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,627,914 Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 600,000 Overland Drive Widening 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 23,222,746 1,289,980 1,138,000 1,224,000 1,312,000 1,401,000 1,492,000 31,079,726 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 140,000 Project Funding 25,125,288 5,818,512 2,095,547 2,872,160 1,312,000 1,889,160 1,492,000 40,604,667 Revenue Projection 32,221,376 4,154,919 1,138,000 1,224,000 1,312,000 1,401,000 1,492,000 Available Funding 7,096,088 5,432,495 4,474,948 2,826,788 2,826,788 2,338,628 2,338,628 Measure S American With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation 0 328,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 721,960 Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Bike Lane and Trail Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting 0 328,600 24,208 0 0 0 0 352,808 Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 Bike Lane And Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail 382,311 572,563 0 0 0 0 0 954,874 Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide 0 49,950 0 0 0 0 0 49,950 Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing 528,801 470,499 67,172 0 0 0 0 1,066,472 Children's Museum Enhancement Project 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 400,000 City Facility Security 100,000 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 City Security Camera System 2,018,585 600,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,618,585 Citywide Drainage Master Plan 260,847 464,153 39,000 0 0 0 0 764,000 Citywide Financial System Upgrade 500,000 113,184 0 0 0 0 0 613,184 Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit 5,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,500,000 Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations 862,473 3,850,601 0 2,394,268 0 0 0 7,107,342 Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures 277,433 2,224,714 0 0 0 0 0 2,502,147 Diaz Road Expansion 171,445 2,000,931 0 0 0 0 0 1,172,376 Dog Park Renovation 157,894 434,980 15,000 0 0 0 0 607,874 48 l I.- of S-h- Cohf. , W� r Funding Source - Project Name Empire Creek Improvements Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage Fire Station 84 Training Room Renovation Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 1-15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping Interstate 15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms Margarita Recreation Center Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement And Renovation Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide Murrieta Creek Bridge At Overland Murrieta Creek Improvements Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension North General Kearny Street Improvements Old Town Security Camera & Sound System Park Restrooms Renovations, Expansion And Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements Parks Improvement Program Pavement Management Program Update Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades - Citywide Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade - Citywide Pickleball Courts Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation Rancho California Road Median Improvements Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 Actuals Amended Budget Projected City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Tota 1 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Projected Projected Projected Cost 0 523,949 400,000 0 0 0 0 923,94 393,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 393,00 89,418 510,582 0 0 0 0 0 600,00 304,565 292,479 47,349 3,419,877 0 0 0 4,064,27 666,750 974,278 550,798 0 0 0 0 2,191,82 194,000 64,000 0 32,000 0 32,000 0 322,00 5,561,573 300,012 170,000 0 0 0 0 6,031,58 150,000 261,817 280,000 200,000 200,000 0 0 1,091,81 441,350 617,133 71,812 0 0 0 0 1,130,29 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,00 0 945,000 362,930 0 0 0 0 1,307,93 1,636,773 3,822,735 0 0 0 0 0 5,459,50 31,311 19,628 0 0 0 0 0 50,93 249,024 703,387 0 0 0 0 0 952,41 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,00 231,900 430,000 250,000 0 0 0 0 911,90 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,00 53,791 180,000 706,867 0 0 0 0 940,65 0 150,000 0 0 0 0 0 150,00 0 557,337 450,000 500,000 0 0 0 1,507,33 568,762 91,238 0 0 0 0 0 660,00 347,800 1,032,000 0 0 0 0 0 1,379 1,369,000 721,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3,840 0 85,020 0 0 0 0 0 85 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50 128,000 (30,000) 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 1,850,878 175,000 0 0 0 0 2,025 2,500,000 2,177,649 500,000 0 0 0 0 5,177 0 350,000 0 0 0 0 0 350 0 150,000 0 40,000 0 0 0 190 49 Heart of S-h- Coltfo ,, W� r Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program 104,786 97,198 0 0 0 0 0 201,984 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink 125,935 1,959,065 0 0 0 0 0 2,085,000 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure 41,051 78,949 0 0 0 0 0 120,000 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation 1,326,285 145,914 0 0 0 0 0 1,472,199 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 0 0 0 0 4,060,000 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension 2,824,608 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,824,608 Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing 737,922 1,797,293 0 0 0 0 0 2,535,215 Sidewalks - Citywide 736,533 306,259 0 0 0 0 0 1,042,792 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements 960,000 (120,842) 0 0 0 0 0 839,158 Sidewalks - Pauba Road 0 594,524 0 0 0 0 0 594,524 Sidewalks - Third Street 0 856,310 0 0 0 0 0 856,310 Sixth Street Improvements 0 452,326 405,000 0 0 0 0 857,326 Sports Court Resurfacing 255,990 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 770,257 Sports Field Lighting - Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion 1,065,417 864,583 0 500,000 0 500,000 0 2,930,000 Storm Drain Pipe Lining 0 532,550 0 532,550 0 1,065,100 0 2,130,200 Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project 0 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 Traffic Signal - Equipment Enhancement Program - Citywide 565,620 1,379,380 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 3,245,000 Traffic Signal - Installation - Citywide 236,242 558,758 0 0 0 0 0 795,000 Traffic Signal - Park & Ride Access Improvements 1,236,640 72,531 0 0 0 0 0 1,309,171 Traffic Signal - Pedestrian Signal Equip. Upgrade Phase 2 0 79,770 0 0 0 0 0 79,770 Traffic Signal -Promenade Mall Ring Road 273,704 200,850 0 0 0 0 0 474,554 Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade 0 0 220,000 0 0 0 0 220,000 Traffic Signal - System Upgrade 92,390 205,000 0 0 0 0 0 297,390 Uptown Temecula Sports Park 0 1,320,000 80,000 0 0 0 0 1,400,000 Utility Undergrounding - Citywide 244,375 244,375 Vail Ranch Park Restrooms 0 945,000 377,930 0 0 0 0 1,322,930 Project Funding 38,964,184 44,583,762 8,306,726 8,407,355 988,660 2,385,760 788,660 104,425,107 Revenue Projection 42,964,184 44,583,762 4,306,726 8,407,355 988,660 2,385,760 788,660 Available Funding 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 50 Tk� fs-h-CC hf W� C.-t,y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Public Art Fund Project Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Revenue Projection 119,150 6,100 3,500 1,450 2,400 2,350 650 Available Funding 119,150 125,250 128,750 130,200 132,600 134,950 135,600 Reimbursements/Other Butterfield Stage Road Extension 932,090 0 0 0 0 0 0 932,090 Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements 0 7,008,270 4,853,630 0 0 0 0 11,861,900 Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 0 750,000 Electric Vehicles Charging Station 0 5,800 0 0 0 0 0 5,800 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 6,023,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,023,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 165,183 0 0 0 0 0 0 165,183 Harveston Community Park Building Renovation and Expansion 0 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 1-15 Congestion Relief 2,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,600,000 I-15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping 2,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,500,000 I-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 1,929,774 694,068 0 0 0 0 0 2,623,842 Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 0 25,000 Motor Car Parkway Improvements 0 0 750,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 Murrieta Creek Improvements 911,085 5,000 0 0 0 0 0 916,085 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 0 7,754,093 0 0 0 0 0 7,754,093 Parks Improvement Program 103,315 282,000 0 0 0 0 0 385,315 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 302,454 0 0 0 0 0 0 302,454 Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation 1,700,000 850,000 0 0 0 0 0 2,550,000 Rancho California Road Median Improvements 0 57,200 0 0 0 0 0 57,200 RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program 0 23,016 0 0 0 0 0 23,016 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation 4,290 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,290 Sidewalks - Third Street 0 116,590 0 0 0 0 0 116,590 Traffic Signal - Installation - Citywide 246,764 3,236 0 0 0 0 0 250,000 Traffic Signal - Park & Ride Access Improvements 500,000 175,000 0 0 0 0 0 675,000 Traffic Signal -Promenade Mall Ring Road 0 44,446 0 0 0 0 0 44,446 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase 1 435,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 435,750 51 Tk� fs—h— CC hf w- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Project Funding 18,353,705 19,793,719 5,603,630 0 0 0 0 43,751,054 Revenue Projection 18,353,705 19,793,719 5,603,630 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SB1/Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) 0 289,980 0 0 0 0 0 289,980 Pavement Management Program Update Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 11,509,528 3,118,752 2,810,553 2,827,154 2,883,697 2,941,371 3,000,198 29,091,253 Project Funding 11,509,528 3,408,732 2,810,553 2,827,154 2,883,697 2,941,371 3,000,198 29,381,233 Revenue Projection 12,548,217 3,408,732 2,810,553 2,894,870 2,981,716 3,071,167 3,163,302 Available Funding 1,038,689 1,038,689 1,038,689 1,106,405 1,204,423 1,334,219 1,497,324 Service Level C - Zone 28 Bike Lane and Trail Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting 48,300 451,700 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Project Funding 48,300 451,700 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 Revenue Projection 48,300 451,700 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Street Maintenance Fund Overland Drive Widening 0 0 2,937,307 0 0 0 0 2,937,307 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 3,600,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,600,000 Project Funding 3,600,000 0 2,937,307 0 0 0 0 6,537,307 Revenue Projection 7,541,537 2,029,981 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 3,941,537 5,971,518 3,034,211 3,034,211 3,034,211 3,034,211 3,034,211 TEAM Fund Electric Vehicles Charging Station 115,807 183,122 0 0 0 0 0 298,929 Murrieta Creek Improvements 0 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 Sports Field Lighting - Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion 0 300,000 0 0 0 0 0 300,000 Project Funding 115,807 683,122 0 0 0 0 0 798,929 Revenue Projection 850,1001 5,592 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 734,2931 56,763 56,763 56,763 56,763 56,763 56,763 52 Tk� fs-h- CC hf W- C.-t, y Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Technology Replacement Fund Citywide Financial System Upgrade 0 763,534 0 0 0 0 0 763,534 Project Funding 0 763,534 0 0 0 0 0 763,534 Revenue Projection 3,026,609 0 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 3,026,609 2,263,075 2,263,075 2,263,075 2,263,075 2,263,075 2,263,075 Transporation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Butterfield Stage Road Extension 1,438,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,438,000 Diaz Road Expansion 812,147 4,753,776 1,165,077 0 0 0 0 6,731,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 16,222,231 4,326,882 0 0 0 0 0 20,549,113 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 1,301,405 1,698,595 0 0 0 0 0 3,000,000 1-15 Congestion Relief 0 3,500,000 0 0 0 0 0 3,500,000 1-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 15,371,504 3,571,981 0 0 0 0 0 18,943,485 Project Funding 35,145,287 17,851,234 1,165,077 0 0 0 0 54,161,598 Revenue Projection 35,145,287 17,851,234 1,165,077 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Uptown Temecula New Streets In Lieu Fee Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project 0 500,857 0 0 0 0 0 500,857 Project Funding 0 500,857 0 0 0 0 0 500,857 Revenue Projection 905,760 672,963 0 0 0 0 0 Available Funding 905,760 1,077,866 1,077,866 1,077,866 1,077,866 1,077,866 1,077,866 Grand Total Project Funding 270,758,439 250,738,510 42,435,528 20,214,128 28,542,761 8,815,516 7,647,453 629,152,335 Grand Total Revenue Projection 321,884,605 229,430,300 34,528,581 21,835,463 27,016,334 12,676,926 8,330,924 Grand 21,911,010 23,532,344 22,005,917i ,799 53 Tk� fs—h—CC hf W� C.-t,y City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Summary - By Funding Source 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Funding Source - Project Name Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Unspecified Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide Bike Lane And Trail Program - Temecula Creek South Side Trail Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing Diaz Road Expansion Empire Creek Improvements French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements -Phase IV Interstate 15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements Rancho California Road Median Improvements Uptown Temecula Sports Park Ynez Road Improvements - Phase II Project Funding Revenue Projection Available Fundine 0 0 0 0 1,144,558 0 0 1,144,558 0 0 0 0 8,593,350 0 0 8,593,350 0 0 0 0 0 3,339,618 34,366,730 37,706,348 0 0 0 0 0 3,614,478 0 3,614,478 0 0 0 0 4,343,659 0 0 4,343,659 0 0 0 0 0 2,850,000 37,890,000 40,740,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 181,400,000 181,400,000 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 0 0 0 0 2,897,000 0 0 2,897,000 0 0 0 0 12,547,822 0 0 12,547,822 0 0 0 0 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 4,459,088 0 0 0 0 30,015,512 11,592,954 256,437,837 298,046,303 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 (30,015,512) (41,608,466) (298,046,303) Grand Total Project Funding 270,758,439 250,738,510 42,435,528 20,214,128 58,558,273 20,408,470 264,085,290 927,1 Grand Total Revenue Projection 321,884,605 229,430,300 34,528,581 21,835,463 27,016,334 12,676,926 8,330,924 Grand Total Available Funding 51,126,166 29,817,957 21,911,010 23,532,344 (8,009,595) (15,741,139) (271,495,504) 54 1 CAdk Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Project Name Funding Source City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Summary - By Project 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost CIRCULATION PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Separated Bike Lanes DIF-Open Space & Trails 125,000 350,000 475,000 Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements County AD 159 4,008,270 4,008,270 Developer Contribution 4,853,630 4,853,630 Reimbursements 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total 7,008,270 4,853,630 11,861,900 Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing Measure S 528,801 470,499 67,172 1,066,472 Unspecified 3,339,618 34,366,730 37,706,348 470,499 67,172 3,339,618 34,366,730 38,772,820 Total 528,801 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout DIF-Street Improvements 9,659 640,341 753,000 806,000 2,209,000 Grants 800,000 800,000 Measure A 1,160,000 1,160,000 Total 9,659 1,440,341 753,000 1,966,000 4,169,000 Diaz Road Expansion DIF-Street Improvements 590 590 Measure A 134,628 3,440,372 957,547 4,532,547 Measure S 171,445 2,000,931 2,172,376 TUMF (WRCOG) 812,147 4,753,776 1,165,077 6,731,000 Unspecified 3,614,478 3,614,478 10,195,079 2,122,624 3,614,478 17,050,991 Total 1,118,810 Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs DIF-Traffic Signals 81,284 81,284 Measure S 194,000 64,000 32,000 32,000 322,000 Total 275,284 64,000 32,000 32,000 403,284 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase II CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 INFRA Grant 1,537,255 48,462,745 50,000,000 Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 Measure S 5,561,573 300,012 170,000 6,031,585 Reimbursements 6,023,000 6,023,000 SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 STIP-Surface Transportation Improvement Program 47,600,000 47,600,000 TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 1,472,509 55 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 2,343,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 13,406,390 3,327,214 16,733,604 138,751,346 Total 36,289,346 102,292,000 170,000 French Valley Parkway/1-15 Improvements - Phase III Affordable Housing 1,669,794 1,669,794 General Fund 30,000 30,000 Measure S 150,000 261,817 280,000 200,000 200,000 1,091,817 Reimbursements 165,183 165,183 STIP-Surface Transportation Improvement Program 5,000,000 5,000,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 1,301,405 1,698,595 3,000,000 Unspecified 2,850,000 37,890,000 40,740,000 1,960,412 5,280,000 200,000 200,000 2,850,000 37,890,000 Total 3,316,382 51,696,794 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements -Phase IV Unspecified 181,400,000 181,400,000 1-15 Congestion Relief General Fund 1,542,267 366,443 1,908,710 Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA 2,500,000 2,500,000 Reimbursements 100,000 100,000 SHOPP 1,250,000 1,250,000 TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 3,500,000 3,500,000 5,116,443 9,258,710 Total 4,142,267 1-15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange CFD 03-01 (Crowne Hill) 502,211 502,211 Reimbursements 739,192 694,068 1,433,260 Reimbursements/Other 1,190,582 1,190,582 SAFETEA-LU 1,439,839 1,439,839 Senate Bill 621 14,446,520 160,000 14,606,520 STP (RCTC) 12,279,728 696,272 12,976,000 TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 5,352,215 47,785 5,400,000 TUMF (RCTC) 4,452,000 4,452,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 5,567,289 3,524,196 9,091,485 5,122,321 51,091,897 Total 45,969,577 Medians & Parkways - Citywide DIF-Street Improvements 854,839 39,999 894,838 Motor Car Parkway Improvements RPTTF-Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund 750,000 750,000 Murrieta Creek Bridge At Overland DIF-Street Improvements 2,010,960 166,960 100,000 5,493,331 7,771,251 HBP-Highway Bridge Program 523,539 51,906 3,879,555 15,377,519 19,832,519 Measure S 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total 2,534,499 1,218,866 3,979,555 20,870,850 28,603,770 56 1 CAdk Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Project Name Funding Source North General Kearny Street Improvements Measure 5 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center DIF-Street Improvements General Fund Overland Drive Widening Pavement Rehabilitation Citywide DIF-Street Improvements Street Maintenance Fund Gas Tax General Fund Measure A Measure 5 Reimbursements RMRA Street Maintenance Fund Rehabilitation Measure 5 Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA Rancho California Road Median Improvements Developer Contribution DIF-Street Improvements Measure 5 Unspecified Traffic Signal - Equipment Enhancement Program - Citywide DIF-Traffic Signals Measure 5 Traffic Signal - Installation - Citywide Developer Contribution DIF-Traffic Signals Measure 5 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Summary - By Project 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 557,337 450,000 500,000 1,507, 8,082,4 235,4 Total 8,317,8 Total 8,317 1,541,020 1,993 2,937,307 2,937 1,541,020 2,937,307 4,930 23,222,746 1,289,980 1,138,000 1,224,000 1,312,000 1,401,000 2,000,000 302,454 10,309,528 3,118,752 2,810,553 2,827,154 2,883,697 2,941,371 3,600,000 Total 46,327,342 4,408,732 3,948,553 4,051,154 4,195,697 4,342,371 350,000 1,700,000 850,000 Total 1,700,000 1,200,000 57,200 20,782 690,018 40,000 150,000 40,000 2,897,000 Total 20,782 897,218 40,000 40,000 2,897,000 519,831 21,957 565,620 1,379,380 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 Total 1,085,451 1,401,337 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 246,764 3,236 1,299,810 82,873 180,000 375,000 236,242 558,758 Total 1.782.816 644,867 180,000 375,000 31,079, 2,000, 302, 27,891, 3,600, 71,766, 57, 750, 190, 2,897, 3,895, 541, 3,245, 3,786, 250, 2,237, 57 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Traffic Signal - Park & Ride Access Improvements Developer Contribution 175,000 175,000 General Fund 226,725 226,725 Measure 5 1,236,640 72,531 1,309,171 Settlement Proceeds 500,000 500,000 2,210,896 Total 1,963,365 247,531 489,510 Traffic Signal -System Upgrade HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 489,510 Measure 5 92,390 205,000 297,390 786,900 Total 92,390 694,510 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase I Developer Contribution 435,750 435,750 DIF-Street Improvements 42,759 (3,509) 1,046,172 1,085,422 Grants 2,475,000 2,475,000 Total 478,509 2,471,491 1,046,172 3,996,172 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase II DIF-Street Improvements 619,451 (272,196) 347,255 Unspecified 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 4,459,088 (272,196) 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 4,806,343 Total 619,451 NUU3111M YKUJCI.Ia Habitat for Humanity Old Town Units Affordable Housing Contribution of Land Total 700,000 561,000 700,000 561,000 1,261,000 1,261,000 Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project Affordable Housing Uptown Temecula New Streets In Lieu Fee Total 7,947,784 7,947,784 1,681,359 500,857 9,629,143 500,857 2,182,216 10,130,000 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site Community Reinvestment Program Contribution of Land Total 1,000,000 1,300,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project TOTAL• • Affordable Housing Community Reinvestment Program Total 2,710,000 4,000,000 2,710,000 4,000,000 6,710,000 6,710,000 000 58 1 CAdk Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS American With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation CDBG 134,574 602,947 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 2,362,521 Measure S 328,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 721,960 931,607 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 3,084,481 Total 134,574 Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs Measure S 200,000 000or 200,000 Bike Lane And Trail Program - Citywide Assembly Bill 2766 256,463 84,420 143,830 151,664 162,554 174,225 186,595 1,159,751 Beyond Grant 19,857 19,857 DIF-Open Space & Trails 72,177 72,177 Unspecified 1,144,558 1,144,558 84,420 143,830 151,664 1,307,112 174,225 186,595 2,396,343 Total 348,497 Bike Lane and Trail Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting Measure S 328,600 24,208 352,808 Service Level C - Zone 28 48,300 451,700 500,000 852,808 Total 48,300 780,300 24,208 Bike Lane and Trail Program - RRSP Trails DIF-Open Space & Trails 59,133 70,000 129,133 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 930,867 930,867 DIF-Quimby 690,000 690,000 Measure S 350,000 350,000 Total 59,133 2,040,867 2,100,000 Bike Lane And Trail Program -Temecula Creek South Side Trail Assembly Bill 2766 67,845 67,845 Measure S 382,311 5 , 954,874 Unspecified 8,593,350 8,593,350 572,563 8,593,350 9,616,069 Total 450,156 Bike Lane Upgrades - Citywide HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 224,550 224,550 Measure S 49,950 49,950 Total 274,500 274,500 Bridge Maintenance Measure A 488,160 488,160 488,160 1,464,480 City Facilities Rehabilitation DIF-Corporate Facilities 250,000 30,000 280,000 Facilities Replacement Fund 1,466,540 1,527,126 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,993,666 General Fund 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,527,126 1,030,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,023,666 Total 3,466,540 City Facility Security Measure S 100,000 150,000 250,000 59 Cam. R 111111 The Heart of Southern California wine co�oo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost City Security Camera System DIF-Corporate Facilities 752,087 752,087 DIF-Police Facilities 1,121,113 1,121,113 Measure 5 2,018,585 600,000 2,618,585 Total 3,891,785 600,000 464,153 39,000 4,491,785 Citywide Drainage Master Plan Measure S 260,847 764,000 Citywide Financial System Upgrade General Fund 0 0 Measure 5 500,000 113,184 613,184 Technology Replacement Fund 763,534 763,534 1,376,718 Total 500,000 876,718 Citywide Streetlight Acquisition & Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit General Fund 2,503,311 2,503,311 Measure 5 5,500,000 5,500,000 8,003,311 Total 8,003,311 Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations Developer Contribution 750,000 750,000 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 1,521,208 400,000 2,457,795 4,379,003 DIF-Quimby 2,353,952 1,096,640 3,450,592 Measure 5 862,473 3,850,601 2,394,268 7,107,342 6,097,241 4,852,063 15,686,937 Total 4,737,633 Community Wildfire Protection Plan Grants 378,000 378,000 Comprehensive General Plan Update General Fund 1,000,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 2,400,000 Grants 310,000 500,000 810,000 Total 1,310,000 900,000 500,000 500,000 3,210,000 Electric Vehicles Charging Station Assembly Bill 2766 47,000 47,000 MSRC-Mobile Source Air Review Committee Grant 141,1 141,000 Reimbursements 5,800 5,800 TEAM 115,807 183,122 298,929 Total 162,807 329,922 492,729 Fiber Optic Communication System Upgrade HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 771,019 437,181 1,208,200 Measure S 393,000 393,000 Total 1,164,019 437,181 1,601,200 Fiber Optic Communications Systems - Citywide DIF-Police Facilities 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 1,004,000 Measure 5 89,418 510,582 600,000 Total 89,418 510,582 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 1,604,000 m Cam. R 111111 The Heart of Southern California wine co�oo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage DIF-Corporate Facilities 43,651 43,651 DIF-Fire Protection Facilities 103,336 24,000 127,336 Measure S 304,565 292,479 47,349 3,419,877 4,064,270 Total 304,565 395,815 115,000 3,419,877 4,235,257 Fire Station 84 Training Room Renovation DIF-Corporate Facilities 85,000 85,000 DIF-Fire Protection Facilities 448,248 448,248 Measure S 666,750 974,278 550,798 2,191,826 Total 666,750 1,422,526 635,798 2,725,074 I-15/State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping Measure S 441,350 617,133 71,812 1,130,295 Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA 2,500,000 2,500,000 617,133 71,812 3,630,295 Total 2,941,350 Interstate 15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvements Measure S 200,000 200,000 Unspecified 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Total Library Alternate Emergency Operations Center Enhancements DIF-Library Facilities 700,000 700,000 Library Technology Enhancements DIF-Library Facilities 240,000 240,000 Margarita Recreation Center Capital Financing 6,405,000 6,405,000 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 600,000 600,000 DIF-Police Facilities 111,256 25,744 137,000 Measure S 1,636,773 3,822,735 5,459,508 Total 8,753,029 3,848,479 12,601,508 Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator Grants 185,000 185,000 Measure S 31,311 50,939 Total 216,311 19,628 235,939 Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement And Renovation CDBG 218,959 838,625 1,057,584 Facilities Replacement Fund 279,694 279,694 Measure S 249,024 703,387 952,411 1,542,012 2,289,689 Total 747,677 Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area CDBG-CV2 40,993 622,675 663,668 Measure S 200,000 200,000 Total 40,993 822,675 863,668 61 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Tota I Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Medians & Traffic Calming Improvements - Citywide DIF-Street Improvements 40,000 40,000 Measure 5 231,900 430,000 250,000 911,900 Reimbursements 25,000 25,000 Total 271,900 455,000 250,000 976,900 Murrieta Creek Improvements DIF-Corporate Facilities 130,000 T130,000 General Fund 135,858 135,858 Measure 5 53,791 180,000 706,867 940,658 Reimbursements 911,085 5,000 916,085 TEAM 200,000 200,000 Total 1,100,734 385,000 450,000 836,867 2,322,601 Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension Assembly Bill 2766 450,000 DIF-Open Space & Trails 300,000 300,000 Measure A 600,000 600,000 Measure 5 150,000 150,000 Total 300,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 Old Town Parking Structure General Fund 1,000,000 1,000,000 Old Town Security Camera & Sound System DIF-Corporate Facilities 517,057 82,943 600,000 Measure 5 568,762 91,238 660,000 174,181 1,260,000 Total 1,085,819 Old Town Temecula Parklets Program Community Reinvestment Program 450,000 Pavement Management Program Update Measure 5 85,020 85,020 RMRA 289,980 289,980 Total 375,000 375,000 Pedestrian Ramp Upgrades - Citywide HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 225,000 225,000 Measure 5 50,000 50,000 Total 275,000 275,000 Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade - Citywide HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 717,753 190,447 908,200 Measure 5 128,000 (30,000) 98,000 Total 845,753 160,447 1,006,200 RCWD Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Measure 5 104,786 97,198 201,984 Reimbursements 23,016 23,016 Total 104,786 225,000 120,214 62 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension Assembly Bill 2766 58,683 58,683 BTA - Bicycle Transportation Account 223,311 223,311 DIF-Open Space & Trails 389,073 389,073 General Fund 78,920 78,920 Measure S 2,824,608 2,824,608 Senate Bill 1 829,463 2,929,537 3,759,000 7,333,595 Total 4,404,058 2,929,537 Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing DIF-Open Space & Trails 1,562,908 1,562,908 Measure S 737,922 1,797,293 2,535,215 Senate Bill 1 1,502,000 1,502,000 Total 737,922 4,862,201 5,600,123 Sidewalks - Citywide General Fund 375,000 375,000 Measure S 736,533 306,259 1,042,792 Total 1,111,533 306,259 1,417,792 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements CDBG 849,426 849,426 Measure A 140,000 140,000 Measure S 960,000 (120,842) 839,158 (120,842) 1,828,584 Total 1,949,426 Sidewalks - Pauba Road Measure S 594,524 594,524 Senate Bill 821 362,600 362,600 Total 957,124 957,124 Sidewalks -Third Street Developer Contribution 116,590 116,590 Measure S 856,310 856,310 Total 972,900 972,900 Sixth Street Improvements Community Reinvestment Program 115,000 115,000 Measure S 452,326 405,000 857,326 Total 452,326 520,000 972,326 South Side Senior Center DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 100,000 100,000 Storm Drain Pipe Lining Measure 5 532,550 532,550 1,065,100 2,130,200 Temecula Creek Fencing Community Reinvestment Program 500,000 500,000 Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 135,100 135,100 63 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Traffic Signal - Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade Phase 2 - Citywide HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 492,930 492,930 Measure S 79,770 79,770 Total 572,700 572,700 Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road Developer Contribution 44,446 44,446 Measure 5 273,704 200,850 474,554 Total 273,704 245,296 519,000 Traffic Signal - Safety Lights and Signal Communications Upgrade- Citywide DIF-Traffic Signals 134,923 459,667 594,590 HSIP-Highway Safety Improvement Program 234,580 2,206,730 2,441,310 Measure S 220,000 220,000 Total 369,503 2,886,397 3,255,900 Urban Forest Management Plan DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 52,300 52,300 Grants 323,930 323,930 Total 52,300 323,930 376,230 Utility Undergrounding - Citywide Measure S 244,375 244,375 Vacant Parcel Clean-up and Beautification Community Reinvestment Program 360,000 360,000 TOTAL• :i PARKS/RECREATION PROJECTS Children's Museum Enhancement Project DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 145,090 145,090 Measure 5 400,000 400,000 Total 545,090 545,090 Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures Measure S 277,433 2,224,714 2,502,147 Dog Park Renovation DIF-Corporate Facilities 100,000 100,000 Grants 447,126 447,126 Measure S 157,894 434,980 15,000 607,874 Total 157,894 882,106 115,000 1,155,000 Empire Creek Improvements Measure S 523,949 400,000 923,949 Unspecified 4,343,658 4,343,658 523,949 400,000 4,343,658 5,267,607 Total Harveston Community Park Building Renovation and Expansion Developer Contribution 2,000,000 2,000,000 DIF-Quimby 1 750,000 347,677 1,097,677 12,750,000 347,677 3,097,677 Total 64 CAdk am. R The Heart of Southern California wine Country Capital Projects Summary - By Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Infill Recreational Amenities DIF-Quimby 4,126 395,874 945,000 362,930 400,000 Long Canyon Creek Park Restrooms Measure S 1,307,930 Park Restrooms Renovations, Expansion And Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Improvements Measure S 347,800 1,032,000 1,379,800 Parks Improvement Program DIF-Quimby 250,000 250,000 General Fund 1,003,059 1,003,059 Measure S 1,369,000 721,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3,840,000 Reimbursements 103,315 282,000 385,315 1,003,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 5,478,374 Total 2,725,374 Pickleball Courts DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 256,718 1,193,282 1,450,000 Measure 5 1,850,878 175,000 2,025,878 Total 256,718 3,044,160 175,000 3,475,878 Playground Equipment Enhancement & Safety Surfacing DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 1,040,000 1,040,000 DIF-Quimby 440,000 500,000 500,000 1,440,000 Measure S 2,500,000 2,177,649 500,000 5,177,649 Total 3,980,000 2,177,649 500,000 500,000 500,000 7,657,649 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 1,014,974 1,014,974 DIF-Quimby 520,432 520,432 Measure S 125,935 1,959,065 2,085,000 Total 125,935 1,959,065 1,535,406 3,620,406 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure Measure S 78,949 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation Measure S 1,326,285 145,914 1,472,199 Reimbursements 4,290 4,290 145,914 1,476,489 Total 1,330,575 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 100,000 100,000 Measure S 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 4,060,000 Total 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 100,000 4,160,000 Sports Court Resurfacing Measure S 255,990 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 770,257 Sports Field Lighting - Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Measure 5 1,065,417 864,583 500,000 500,000 2,930,000 TEAM 300,000 IL300,000 Total 1,065,4171 1,164,583 500,000 500,000 3,230,000 Temecula Duck Pond Spillway Project Measure S 1 200,000 200,000 65 1 CAdk Heart of Southern California wine couoo-y City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Capital Projects Summary - By Project 2024-25 Total Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Project Capital Project Name Funding Source Actuals Amended Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Uptown Temecula Sports Park DIF-Quimby 121,951 878,049 1,000,000 Measure S 1,320,000 80,000 1,400,000 Unspecified 12,547,822 12,547,822 14,947,822 Total 121,9511 2,198,049 I 945,000 80,000 377,930 12,547,822 Vail Ranch Park Restrooms Measure S 1,322,930 PROJECTS FUNDED BY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT BONDS PROJECTS Butterfield Stage Road Extension CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 38,401,739 635,200 39,036,939 Reimbursements 932,090 932,090 TU M F 1,438,000 1,438,000 Total 40,771,829 635,200 41,407,029 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 11,784 7,695,933 7,707,717 CFD 16-01(Roripaugh Ranch -Phase II) 6,722,850 6,722,850 Developer Contribution 7,754,093 7,754,093 22,184,660 Total 11,784 22,172,876 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation CFD 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 837,236 27,808 1 865,044 City of Temecula �� Fiscal Years 2025-29 R Capital Improvement Program The Heart of5outhernCalifornia Wine Country Summary of Operating & Maintenance Impacts Description Projected Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Capital Project Operating Budget Account and Operations of PW17-01/711 - CITY SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM 5250 - OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Security Camera System 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 FN19-01/724- CITYWIDE FINANCIAL SYSTEM UPGRADE 5211- SOFTWARE &MAINTENANCE Annual Software Maintenance 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 PW17-18/688 - CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION & LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RETROFIT 5319 -STREET LIGHTING Electricity Savings (695,564) (709,475) (723,665) (738,138) PW17-19/690 - 1-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING 5415 - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE Required by Caltrans 60,830 62,046 63,289 65,188 PW17-21/692 - MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER 5100 - SALARIES & WAGES Staffing for MRC (4 positions) 527,453 548,551 570,493 591,600 Project Staffing for MRC 5119 - PART-TIME (PROJECT) (45 positions - 13.07 FTEs) 707,078 735,361 764,775 795,366 5240 - UTILITIES Additional Utility Costs 71,400 72,828 74,285 77,034 5250 - OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial/Security 129,302 131,888 134,526 139,504 1,435, 233 1,488, 628 1,544,079 1,603,504 IT20-01/780 - OLD TOWN SECRUITY CAMERA & SOUND Maintenance fee for Old Town SYSTEM 5215 - REPAIR & MAINTENANCE Sound System 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 PWPE07-03/PW23-18 - LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOMS 5250 - OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 PWPE-07/155 - PARK RESTROOMS RENOVATIONS, EXPANSION AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS 5250 - OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 27,602 28,154 28,717 29,292 PWPE07-02 - VAIL RANCH PARK RESTROOMS 5250 - OTHER OUTSIDE SERVICES Janitorial Services 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 Operating cost impacts are estimated by the Project Manager. Incremental Operating impacts have been reflected in the City's General Fund and TC5D 5-Year Financial Forecasts. 67 E ON 1 [01 Ll OU k9lo I" Yf" I Of Ir Uo " .41 1 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Circulation Projects Map ID Description Map ID Description 1 Butterfield Stage Road Seperated Bike Lanes 11 Motor Car Parkway Improvements 2 Butterfield Stage Road Storm Drain Improvements 12 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive , 3 Cherry Street Extension and Murrieta Creek Crossing 13 North General Kearny Street Improvements 4 De Portola Road/Jedediah Smith Road Roundabout Project 14 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center 5 Diaz Road Expansion 15 Overland Drive Widening 6 I-15/1'rench Valley Parkway Improvements- Phase II 16 Rainbow Canyon Road Pavement Rehabilitation 7 I-15/1'rench Valley Parkway Improvements- Phase III 17 Rancho California Road Median Improvements 8 I-15/1'rench Valley Parkway Improvements- Phase IV 18 Traffic Signal - Park and Ride Access Improvements 9 I-15 Congestion Relief 19 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase I 10 Interstate- 15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 20 Ynez Road Improvements - Phase II 70 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD SEPARATED BIKE LANES Circulation Project Project Description: This project will provide separated bike lanes along Butterfield Stage Road from Murrieta Hot Springs to De Portola Road. Benefit: This project improves bicycle safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This is a new project. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.New 3 Level: I i ■ 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 25,000 50,000 75,000 5804-Construction 300,000 300,000 5802-Design & Environmental 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 125,000 350,000 475,000 Source of Funds: 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 125,000 350,000 475,000 Total Funding 125,000 350,000 475,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 71 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project will install storm drain improvements on the east side of Butterfield Stage Road from south of De Portola Road to south of Wolf Store Road. The project includes the installing of storm drain pipes, widening the east side of Butterfield Stage Road north of Temecula Parkway, and relocating sewer facilities. The project is funded by County Assessment District 159 and the County of Riverside. Benefit: This project provides storm drain improvements to protect adjacent areas from potential flooding and improves traffic circulation at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Temecula Parkway. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: The County of Riverside is in the final stages of design. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-15 / 792 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 186,060 247,090 433,150 5804-Construction 6,202,009 2,460,991 8,663,000 5805-Construction Engineering 620,201 1,545,549 2,165,750 5700-Land Acquisition 600,000 600,000 Total Expenditures 7,008,270 4,853,630 11,861,900 Source of Funds: 4479-County AD 159 4,008,270 4,008,270 4666-Developer Contribution 4,853,630 4,853,630 4438-Reimbursements 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total Funding - 7,008,270 4,853,630 11,861,900 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Reimbursements reflect the contribution from the County of Riverside 2. An agreement is being executed between the City and Riverside County for this project. 72 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program CHERRY STREET EXTENSION & MURRIETA CREEK CROSSING Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental clearance, and construction of the extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a bridge across Murrieta Creek at the northerly City limits. Initially, preliminary engineering and environmental assessments will be performed to evaluate feasibility of several crossing types. If deemed appropriate, the project will proceed to final design, environmental clearance/permits, right of way acquisition, and construction. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation and access from and to the northerly industrial area west of Murrieta Creek. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Design and environmental assessment will be done through Fall 2025. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-15 / 524 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed 2025-26 Budget Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 183,092 201,908 67,172 50,000 1,500,000 2,002,172 5804-Construction 28,110,200 28,110,200 5805-Construction Engineering 3,351,020 3,351,020 5802-Design & Environmental 345,709 268,591 3,289,618 3,903,918 5806-MSHCP 1,405,510 1,405,510 Total Expenditures 1 528,8011 470,499 67,172 3,339,618 34,366,7301 38,772,820 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4452-Unspecified 528,801 470,499 67,172 3,339,618 34,366,730 1,066,472 37,706,348 Total Funding 528,801 470,499 67,172 3,339,618 34,366,730 38,772,820 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 73 ItL� f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program DE PORTOLA ROAD / JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROJECT Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a traffic circle, roundabout, on Ynez / De Portola Road at the intersection of Jedediah Smith Road. The improvements include the construction of a raised traffic circle with desert style hardscape inside the circle. Benefit: This project maintains the natural beauty of the community and improves traffic safety at this intersection. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project was initiated in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-01 / 797 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 2026-27 Projected Projected 2027-28 2028-29 Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 9,659 147,341 233,000 390,000 5804-Construction 1,010,000 1,590,000 2,600,000 5805-Construction Engineering 45,000 33,000 78,000 5802-Design & Environmental 187,500 353,000 110,000 650,500 5700-Land Acquisition 400,000 400,000 5806-MSHCP 50,500 50,500 Total Expenditures 9,659 1,440,341 753,000 1,966,000 4,169,000 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 9,659 640,341 753,000 806,000 2,209,000 4025-Grants 800,000 800,000 4170-Measure A 1,160,000 1,160,000 Total Funding 9,659 1,440,341 753,000 1,966,000 4,169,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Grant funding reflects the Economic Development Initiative / Community Project Funding (EDI/CPF) for Federal Fiscal Year 2023 - Federal Omnibus Bill 2023 signed into law on 12/29/2023. 74 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION Circulation Project Project Description: Converts Diaz Road into a Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided) classification, between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. Improvements will be added to Diaz Road on its current alignment as shown in the Roadway Plan of the General Plan's Circulation Element. This project includes the design, environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction necessary to complete the 2.2 mile segment, which will be developed and constructed in phases: Phase 1: Diaz Road from Winchester Rd to Rancho California Rd and Phase 2: Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Rd has an unspecified funding source. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by expanding an important north -south arterial on the west side of the City and completes a portion of the designated Western Bypass. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Phase 1 is in the design and environmental clearance phase. Construction of Phase 1 is anticipated in the Summer of 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-25 / 521 Level: III City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed 2025-26 Budget Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 198,548 83,487 100,000 139,478 521,513 5804-Construction 8,352,376 1,647,624 2,800,000 12,800,000 5805-Construction Engineering 720,000 180,000 255,000 1,155,000 5802-Design & Environmental 1,065,930 493,548 95,000 280,000 1,934,478 5806-MSHCP 400,000 100,000 140,000 640,000 Total Expenditures 1 1,264,4791 10,049,411 2,122,624 3,614,478 17,050,991 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 590 590 4170-Measure A 134,628 3,440,372 957,547 4,532,547 4002-Measure S 171,445 2,000,931 2,172,376 4472-TUMF (WRCOG) 812,147 4,753,776 1,165,077 6,731,000 4452-Unspecified 3,614,478 3,614,478 Total Funding 1,118,810 10,195,079 2,122,624 3,614,478 17,050,991 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 75 Ili f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION Circulation Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: I Actuals I Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to approval of the Public Works Committee to program PAED and ENG to Diaz Road (designated Western Bypass). After the approval of the WRCOG Executive Committee, an agreement between the City and WRCOG will need to be executed. After the PAED and ENG phases are complete, City will request that any unused funds be reprogrammed to the CON phase. 2. TUMF (WRCOG) Zone funding: $1,065,923 for Design/Environmental and $3,500,000 for Construction. Additional $1,000,000 to be programmed for Construction by WRCOG. City's maximum share is reached with Fiscal Year 2024-25 appropriation ($6,731,000). 76 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FLASHING BEACONS & SPEED ADVISORY SIGNS Circulation Project Project Description: This project maintains the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program, School Area Safety, and Arterial Traffic Calming by installing flashing beacons, rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFB) and speed advisory signs to advise motorists of school zones, crosswalks and speed limits. This project includes solar powered panels, programmable timers, chargeable batteries, aluminum poles, signs, and all necessary installation equipment. Benefit: This project improves traffic safety on roadways, neighborhoods, and school zones. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: The installation of flashing beacons and LED speed limit display signs is ongoing. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFB-18 / 670 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 2,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 5804-Construction 261,743 73,541 30,000 30,000 395,284 5802-Design & Environmental 2,000 1,000 1,000 14,000 Total Expenditures 261,743 77,541 - 32,000 - 32,000 403,284 Source of Funds: 4243-DIF-Traffic Signals 4002-Measure S 81,284 194,000 64,000 32,000 32,000 81,284 322,000 Total Funding 275,284 64,000 - 32,000 - 32,000 - 403,284 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 77 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction May 2023 through February 2025. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW16-01 / 726 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 3,303,969 426,365 170,000 3,900,334 5804-Construction 4,941,062 85,013,938 89,955,000 5805-Construction Engineering 1,032,749 9,868,251 10,901,000 5802-Design & Environmental 19,440,322 29,446 19,469,768 5700-Land Acquisition 13,782,603 740,648 14,523,251 5240-Utilities 1,993 1,993 Total Expenditures 1 42,502,699 96,078,647 170,000 138,751,346 Source of Funds: 4271-CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 4001-General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 4668-1NFRA Grant 11537,255 48,462,745 50,000,000 4170-Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 4002-Measure S 5,561,573 300,012 170,000 6,031,585 4438-Reimbursements 6,023,000 6,023,000 4465-SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 4426-STIP-Surface Transportation 47,600,000 47,600,000 Improvement Program 4473-TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 11472,509 4474-TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 21343,000 4472-TUMF (WRCOG) 113,406,3901 3,327,214 16,733,604 Total Funding 36,289,346 102,292,000 170,000 138,751,346 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 78 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) funds. 2. State Transportation Improvement Program-2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013 ($10,000,000). 3. TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875-PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase II. 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase II. 6. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. 7. TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No. 17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). 79 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the complete improvements of the French Valley Parkway Interchange overcrossing and northbound onramps. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing another alternative for crossing Interstate 15 and access to northbound Interstate 15. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Design will begin in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-03 / 728 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected 2027-28 Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 97,688 229,312 280,000 200,000 200,000 350,000 450,000 1,807,000 5804-Construction 28,800,000 28,800,000 5805-Construction Engineering 8,640,000 8,640,000 5802-Design & Environmental 200,000 5,000,000 5,200,000 5700-Land Acquisition 2,979,147 1,770,647 2,500,000 7,249,794 Total Expenditures 3,076,835 2,199,959 5,280,000 200,000 200,000 2,850,000 37,890,000 51,696,794 Source of Funds: 4165-Affordable Housing 1,669,794 1,669,794 4001-General Fund 30,000 30,000 4002-Measure S 150,000 261,817 280,000 200,000 200,000 1,091,817 4438-Reimbursements 165,183 165,183 4426-STIP-Surface Transportation 5,000,000 5,000,000 Improvement Program 4472-TUMF (WRCOG) 1,301,405 1,698,595 31000,000 4452-Unspecified 2,850,000 37,890,000 40,740,000 Total Funding 1 3,316,3821 1,960,412 5,280,000 200,000 200,000 2,850,000 37,890,0001 51,696,794 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III Circulation Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: I Actuals I Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is eligible for construction of Winchester Interchange pursuant to 2009 Nexus - $9,822,980.00 2. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is eligible for construction of French Valley Interchange pursuant to 2009 Nexus - $43,480,000.00. 3. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding for right-of-way (ROW) pursuant to Agreement No. 20-SW-TEM-1197 - $1,500,000 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding for right-of-way (ROW as approved by WRCOG for FY 2023-24, $1,500,000) - Amendment of Agreement No. 20- SW-TEM-1197 is pending. 5. State Transportation Improvement Program - Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved funding at 10/11/2023 meeting. California Transportation Commission approval is pending. 6. Affordable Housing funding reflects the acquisition of land with bond proceeds from the 2017 Tax Allocation Housing Bonds, to be used for a potential future Affordable Housing project. 81 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE IV Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the remaining improvements for French Valley Parkway Interchange including the southbound collector/distributor road system and the braided offramps and onramps. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing a full service interchange with on and off ramps in both directions. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Work on this project will begin once funds are available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.New 2 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 3,500,000 3,500,000 5807-Caltrans Oversight 24,000,000 24,000,000 5804-Construction 128,000,000 128,000,000 5805-Construction Engineering 6,000,000 6,000,000 5802-Design & Environmental 15,500,000 15,500,000 5700-Land Acquisition 4,400,000 4,400,000 Total Expenditures 181,400,000 181,400,000 Source of Funds: 4452-Unspecified I I 181,400,0001 181,400,000 Total Funding 181,400,0001 181,400,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is eligible for construction of Winchester Interchange pursuant to 2009 Nexus - $9,822,980.00 2. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is eligible for construction of French Valley Interchange pursuant to 2009 Nexus - $43,480,000.00 82 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 1-15 CONGESTION RELIEF Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 (1-15) connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Benefit: This project provides an operational improvement to relieve congestion on northbound 1-15. It represents one of several operational improvements identified by the Move 1-15 Regional Task Force to address congestion on 1-15. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Project is in construction March 2024 through October 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-02 / 609 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 190,010 285,017 475,027 5804-Construction 6,154,988 6,154,988 5805-Construction Engineering 1,220,000 1,220,000 5802-Design & Environmental 1,339,792 68,902 1,408,695 Total Expenditures 1,529,803 7,728,907 9,258,710 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 1,542,267 366,443 1,908,710 4078-Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA 2,500,000 2,500,000 4438-Reimbursements 100,000 100,000 4484-S H 0 P P 1,250,000 1,250,000 4473-TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 3,500,000 3,500,000 Total Funding 4,142,267 5,116,443 9,258,710 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. SHOPP - State Highway Operation and Protection Program and Minor Program 2. RCTC Agreement No. 22-73-032-00; City Agreement 2022-035 3. Reimbursement of $100,000 reflects contribution from the City of Murrieta 83 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program I-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the construction of a ramp system improving access to Interstate 15 from State Route 79 South, to accommodate traffic generated by future development anticipated in the City's General Plan as well as regional traffic volume forecasted through 2037. Benefit: This project will improve circulation and freeway access at the Interstate 15 and State Route 79 South intersection. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction was completed in April 2020. City is working with Caltrans on transference of project rights of way to the State. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW04-08 / 662 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 1,533,303 261,230 1,794,533 5804-Construction 26,576,106 996,803 27,572,909 5805-Construction Engineering 4,047,023 254,255 4,301,278 5802-Design & Environmental 4,116,400 101,527 4,217,927 5700-Land Acquisition 13,032,881 150,847 13,183,728 5240-Utilities 15,779 5,744 21,523 Total Expenditures 1 49,321,4911 1,770,407 51,091,897 Source of Funds: 4273-CFD 03-01 (Crowne Hill) 502,211 502,211 4438-Reimbursements 739,192 694,068 1,433,260 4466-Reimbursements/Other 1,190,582 11190,582 4465-SAFETEA-LU 1,439,839 1,439,839 4460-Senate Bill 621 14,446,520 160,000 14,606,520 4439-STP (RCTC) 12,279,728 696,272 12,976,000 4473-TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 5,352,215 47,785 5,400,000 4474-TUMF (RCTC) 4,452,000 41452,000 4472-TUMF (WRCOG) 5,567,289 3,524,196 9,091,485 Total Funding 45,969,577 5,122,321 51,091,897 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 84 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program I-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE Circulation Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: I Actuals I Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. SAFETEA-LU - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76) (63.51% of Federal Participating Costs, up to $1,439,840) 2. STP (RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76)(63.51% of Federal Participating Costs, up to $12,976,000) 3. TUMF (RCTC/Region) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-506 ($4,452,000 Total) 4. TUMF (RCTC/CETAP) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 11-72-041-00 ($5,400,000 Total;$1,400,000 ROW;$4,000,000 CON). 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement 13-SW-TEM-1163($10,025,244 CON); Returned $933,760 unused to TUMF (WRCOG). 6. Pursuant to RCWD UA 23316 - RCWD shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 01 ($280,560) 7. Pursuant to EMWD UA 23317 - EMWD shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 02 ($415,000) 8. Revenues collected on Lease Agreement with Front Street - Service Station, LP dated September 11, 2013 (est. $740,000) 9. Notes : 1. SAFETEA-LU - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76) (63.51% of Federal Participating Costs, up to $1,439,840) 2. STP (RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to Authorization/Agreement Summary (E-76)(63.51% of Federal Participating Costs, up to $12,976,000) 3. TUMF (RCTC/Region) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 06-72-506 ($4,452,000 Total) 4. TUMF (RCTC/CETAP) - Funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No. 11-72-041-00 ($5,400,000 Total;$1,400,000 ROW;$4,000,000 CON). 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement 13- SW-TEM-1163($10,025,244 CON) 6. Pursuant to RCWD UA 23316 - RCWD shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 01 ($280,560) 7. Pursuant to EMWD UA 23317 - EMWD shall reimburse City for actual costs of Additive Bid No. 02 ($415,000) 8. Revenues collected on Lease Agreement with Front Street - Service Station, LP dated September 11, 2013 (est. $740,000) 85 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MEDIANS & PARKWAYS - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: Pursuant to Conditions of Approval, this project completes the missing portions of the raised landscaped median island on (a) Rancho California Road between Moraga Road to Lyndie Lane ($188,000), and (b) Ynez Road from Date Street to the City boundary ($100,000). Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by eliminating potential conflicts between left turn movements and through traffic on circulation element streets with a classification of major arterial or higher. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project will reimburse developers for eligible improvements upon project completion. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWMP-09 / 622 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 666,838 228,000 894,838 Total Expenditures 666,8381 228,000 894,838 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 1 854,839 39,999 1 894,838 Total Funding 1 854,839 39,999 894,838 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MOTOR CAR PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of roadway improvements on Motor Car Parkway, Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Solana Way. This project was previously required as part of the Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) with Abbott Corporation, however in 2018 Abbott sold the subject property to Mt. San Jacinto Community College, who assumed interest in the OPA requiring the road improvements. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation on Motor Car Parkway, Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Solana Way. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project has not yet started. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWM1-17 / 620 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 750,000 750,000 Total Expenditures 750,000 750,000 Source of Funds: 4381-RPTTF-Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund 750,000 750,000 Total Funding 750,000 750,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. Funding for this project will be provided through the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) as it was an obligation of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 87 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AT OVERLAND Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. This project also includes environmental studies, mitigation, acquisition of right-of-way, and installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Diaz Road and Enterprise Circle West and Commerce. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over -crossing. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is currently in design and is partially funded by the Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP). During design phase staff will continue seeking additional programming and allocation of more HBP funds for the project. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW16-05 / 648 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed 2025-26 Budget Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 334,413 176,988 100,000 110,000 721,401 5804-Construction 18,179,000 18,179,000 5805-Construction Engineering 2,479,000 2,479,000 5802-Design & Environmental 1,062,863 1,668,556 2,731,419 5700-Land Acquisition 3,584,000 3,584,000 5806-MSHCP 510,545 295,555 102,850 908,950 Total Expenditures 1 1,397,2771 2,356,088 3,979,555 - 20,870,850 28,603,770 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 2,010,960 166,960 100,000 5,493,331 7,771,251 4417-HBP-Highway Bridge Program 523,539 51,906 3,879,555 15,377,519 19,832,519 4002-Measure S 1,000,000 1,000,000 Total Funding 2,534,499 1,218,866 3,979,555 - 20,870,850 28,603,770 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AT OVERLAND Circulation Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: I Actuals I Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Funding is 88.53% of participating items only. 2. DIF Street Improvements funding covers 11.47% of participating items and 100% of non -participating items. 3. HBP funding is authorized for reimbursement by Caltrans in a piecemeal fashion based on project progress, available funding in any given year, and the progress of other projects in the program. 4. When HBP funds are authorized for reimbursement by Caltrans, the reimbursable fiscal year may or may not be identified. 5. While the HBP recognizes the total project cost, it does not program its funds into the future. f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program NORTH GENERAL KEARNY STREET IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project will include the construction of full street improvements from Long Canyon Creek Park to just past the Camino Campos Verdes intersection. Improvement plans to include new sidewalk, curb, gutter, ADA ramps and the relocation of traffic signal poles and crosswalk at Camino Campos Verde. A study to identify and prioritize areas with missing sidewalks was completed as part of the Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update in Fiscal Year 2015-16. Based on the study and the available resources, sidewalks will be constructed in the selected areas considering economy of scale and proximity to private development. Benefit: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This is a NEW project split from SIDEWALKS - CITYWIDE. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.NEW (PW24-02) Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 50,000 50,000 100,000 5804-Construction 346,586 270,000 320,000 936,586 5805-Construction Engineering 135,588 60,000 60,000 255,588 5802-Design & Environmental 75,163 70,000 70,000 215,163 Total Expenditures 557,337 450,000 500,000 1,507,337 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I I 557,337 450,000 500,000 I 1,507,337 Total Funding 557,337 450,000 500,000 1,507,337 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 01 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION COMMERCE CENTER Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive to Murrieta Creek, just west of Enterprise Circle West. This project also includes environmental studies, acquisition of right-of-way, new road improvements and installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Commerce Center Drive. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over -crossing. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction is complete. The City Council accepted the improvements on December 10, 2019. Traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive is delayed until the Murrieta Creek Bridge is built. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW16-06 / 602 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 787,813 4,839 792,652 5804-Construction 1,086,122 235,920 1,322,042 5805-Construction Engineering 47,434 6,297 53,731 5802-Design & Environmental 720,946 9,768 730,714 5700-Land Acquisition 5,278,917 76,394 5,355,311 5806-MSHCP 21,968 21,968 5240-Utilities 36,120 5,359 41,480 Total Expenditures 7,979,319 338,578 8,317,897 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 4001-General Fund 8,082,475 235,422 8,082,475 235,422 Total Funding 8,317,897 8,317,897 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 91 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country OVERLAND DRIVE WIDENING Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental document, and construction for the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive. The project also includes right of way acquisition. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by eliminating the bottleneck of Overland Drive and create a continuous improved Overland Drive corridor from Margarita Road to Enterprise Circle West. Also, this project will facilitate meeting the traffic mitigation requirements for the Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive project. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Project is currently in design. Right of way acquisition in FY 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW20-11 / 783 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 162,364 146,793 348,000 657,157 5804-Construction 2,501,510 2,501,510 5805-Construction Engineering 67,000 40,164 107,164 5802-Design & Environmental 221,851 152,992 374,843 5700-Land Acquisition 1,175,000 1,175,000 5806-MSHCP 67,020 47,633 114,653 Total Expenditures 384,215 1,608,805 2,937,307 4,930,327 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 4103-Street Maintenance Fund 452,000 1,541,020 2,937,307 1,993,020 2,937,307 Total Funding 452,000 1,541,020 2,937,307 4,930,327 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 92 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Anticipated Year of Useful Construction & Estimated Street and Limits Life(Years) Funds Available Prior Years Actual Expenditures $46,327,342 2023-24 Adjusted Pechanga Parkway (Temecula Pkwy to Via Eduardo) (10-20) Butterfield Stage Road (Temecula Pkwy to Southern City Limits) (10-20) $3,118, 752 $1,289,980 $4,408,732 2024-25 Pauba Road (Ynez Rd to Margarita Rd) (10-20) Felix Valdez (Vincent Moraga Dr to Pujol St) (10-20) Rancho Way (Diaz Rd to Business Park Dr) (10-20) Santiago Rd (East of bridge to Ynez Rd) (10-20) $2,810,553 $1,138,000 $3,948,553 2025-26 Rancho Vista Road (Ynez Rd to Margarita Rd) (10-20) Meadows Parkway (Temecula Parkway to Rancho California Rd) (10-20) $2, 827,154 $1,224,000 $4,051,154 2026-27 Ynez Road (Rancho California Rd to Solana Wy) (10-20) Nighthawk Pass (Butterfield Stage Road to Vail Ranch Parkway) (10-20) $2,883,697 $1,312,000 $4,195,697 2027-28 Peppercorn Drive (Deer Hollow Way to Redhawk Parkway) (10-20) Wolf Valley Road (Pechanga Parkway to Redhawk Parkway) (10-20) $2,941,371 $1,401,000 $4,342,371 2028-29 Redhawk Parkway (Temecula Parkway to Vail Ranch Parkway) (10-20) Old Town Front Street (S/o First St to Rancho california Rd) (10-20) $3,000,198 $1,492,000 $4,492,198 Total $71,766,047 (1) Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1) - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Funding Source RMRA" Measure A RMRA ") Measure A RMRA ") Measure A RMRA ") Measure A RMRA ") Measure A RMRA ") Measure A 93 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and reconstruction of major streets as recommended in the Pavement Management Program update. Benefit: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects from the Pavement Management Program is used to determine the projects to be undertaken. Construction is completed annually based on the allocated funds. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWPR-01 / 655 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected 2027-28 Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 4,049,784 672,413 682,098 670,888 300,000 300,000 300,000 6,975,183 5804-Construction 40,738,232 3,143,205 2,881,178 2,991,857 3,645,697 3,742,371 3,892,198 61,034,738 5805-Construction Engineering 737,476 496,922 385,277 388,409 250,000 300,000 300,000 2,858,084 5802-Design & Environmental 801,851 96,192 898,042 Total Expenditures 46,327,342 4,408,732 3,948,553 4,051,154 4,195,697 4,342,371 4,492,198 71,766,047 Source of Funds: 4100-Gas Tax 1,200,000 1,200,000 4001-General Fund 5,692,614 5,692,614 4170-Measure A 23,222,746 1,289,980 1,138,000 1,224,000 1,312,000 1,401,000 1,492,000 31,079,726 4002-Measure S 2,000,000 2,000,000 4438-Reimbursements 302,454 302,454 4102-RMRA 10,309,528 3,118,752 2,810,553 2,827,154 2,883,697 2,941,371 3,000,198 27,891,253 4103-Street Maintenance Fund 3,600,000 3,600,000 Total Funding 1 46,327,3421 4,408,732 3,948,553 4,051,154 4,195,697 4,342,371 4,492,1981 71,766,047 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Road Repair and Accountability Act (RMRA) 94 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RAINBOW CANYON ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction for the pavement rehabilitation of Rainbow Canyon Road, from Pechanga Parkway to the southern City Limits. Benefit: The project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry and government can be met. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction to start summer 2024 Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-15 / 786 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 38,515 261,485 300,000 5804-Construction 2,074,910 2,074,910 5805-Construction Engineering 50,000 50,000 5802-Design & Environmental 79,413 395,677 475,090 Total Expenditures 117,928 2,782,072 2,900,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4078-Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA 1,700,000 350,000 850,000 350,000 2,550,000 Total Funding 1,700,000 1,200,000 2,900,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 95 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project will design and construct missing raised medians on Rancho California Road between Humber Drive and Butterfield Stage Road in accordance with the City's General Plan. In addition, missing street improvements will be constructed on the north side of Rancho California Road between Riesling Court and Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The improvements will include median curbs, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and landscape and irrigation. Benefit: The raised medians will enhance the safety of the street. In addition, the landscaping of the proposed medians will improve the aesthetics of this road for motorists. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Scoping initiated in FY2022-23. Design anticipated to begin in Spring/Summer 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-04 / 791 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 20,782 144,218 40,000 40,000 300,000 545,000 5804-Construction 2,512,000 2,512,000 5805-Construction Engineering 85,000 85,000 5802-Design & Environmental 698,000 698,000 5240-Utilities 55,000 55,000 Total Expenditures 20,782 897,218 40,000 40,000 2,897,000 3,895,000 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 57,200 57,200 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 20,782 690,018 40,000 750,800 4002-Measure S 150,000 40,000 190,000 4452-Unspecified 2,897,000 2,897,000 Total Funding 20,782 897,218 40,000 40,000 2,897,000 3,895,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution represents the Pervis Development's fair share of the medians. W Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the enhancement and upgrade of existing traffic signal equipment at various signalized intersections citywide. This includes replacement of traffic signal controllers, battery back-up systems, Light Emitting Diode (LED) traffic signal indications, traffic signal controller cabinets, service cabinets, safety street lighting, signal communication equipment, and fiber optic cable. This project will also include an upgrade of existing traffic signal conductors including conduit, service conductors, and detector cable to comply with current standards. Benefit: This project enhances traffic safety and supports the long-term enhancements and rehabilitation of City assets and infrastructure. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Enhancements will be completed on an ongoing basis when funding becomes available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWTE-19 / 680 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 60,747 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 110,747 5804-Construction 137,525 547,475 685,000 5601-Furnishings & Equipment 969,883 771,158 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 2,991,041 Total Expenditures 1,107,408 1,379,381 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 3,786,788 Source of Funds: 4243-DIF-Traffic Signals 4002-Measure S 519,831 565,620 21,957 1,379,380 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 541,788 3,245,000 Total Funding 1,085,451 1,401,337 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 260,000 3,786,788 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 97 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Signal Location Prior Year Actual Expenditures Rancho California Road at Tee Drive Margarita Road at Jedediah Smith Road Meadows Parkway at Pauba Road (1) City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Total Project Cost Year Funding Source $ 246,764 $ 1,299,810 $ 236,242 Total $ 1,782,816 $ 3,236 $ 82,873 $ 558,758 Total $ 644,867 Developer Contribution DIF-Traffic Signals Measure S 2023-24 Developer Contribution DIF(Traffic) Measure S $ 180,000 2024-25 Total $ 180,000 $ 2025-26 $ 375,000 2026-27 Total $ 375,000 $ 2027-28 Total $ DIF(Traffic) Measure S DIF(Traffic) Meadows Parkway at Campanula Way (West) (1) $ 300,000 2028-29 DIF(Traffic) De Portola Road at Campanula Way (East)(1) Total $ 300,000 $ 3,282,683 (1) DIF Traffic Developer Reimbursement Prior Year Actual Expenditures $ 1,782,816 Fiscal Year 2023-24 $ 644,867 Fiscal Year 2024-25 $ 180,000 Fiscal Year 2025-26 $ - Fiscal Year 2026-27 $ 375,000 Fiscal Year 2027-28 $ - Fiscal Year 2028-29 $ 300,000 TOTAL: $ 3,282,683 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country TRAFFIC SIGNAL - INSTALLATION - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, installation and modification of traffic signals at various locations throughout the City. The project also includes reimbursement for developer installed traffic signals. Benefit: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A priority list of traffic signals has been developed. The traffic signals scheduled for installation will be designed and constructed in the scheduled fiscal year when funding becomes available. Reimbursements for developer installed traffic signals will be made as Development Impact Fees for Traffic Signals become available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWTS-06 / 682 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 314,462 123,416 50,000 487,878 5804-Construction 1,521,846 309,554 130,000 375,000 300,000 2,636,400 5802-Design & Environmental 29,379 1 129,025 158,404 Total Expenditures 1,865,688 561,995 180,000 - 375,000 - 300,000 3,282,683 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 246,764 3,236 250,000 4243-DIF-Traffic Signals 1,299,810 82,873 180,000 375,000 300,000 2,237,683 4002-Measure S 236,242 558,758 795,000 Total Funding 1,782,816 644,867 180,000 - 375,000 - 300,000 3,282,683 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution from LS Terracina, LLC for developer share of the traffic signal. f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PARK & RIDE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Benefit: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Construction was completed in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW18-11 / 605 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 762,780 762,780 5804-Construction 830,172 209,842 1,040,014 5805-Construction Engineering 94,099 32,236 126,335 5802-Design & Environmental 273,651 5,453 279,104 5806-MSHCP 2,664 2,664 Total Expenditures 1,963,365 247,531 2,210,896 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 175,000 175,000 4001-General Fund 226,725 226,725 4002-Measure S 1,236,640 72,531 1,309,171 4485-Settlement Proceeds 500,000 500,000 Total Funding 1,963,365 247,531 2,210,896 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution from Temecula Valley Hospitality for developer share of the traffic signal. 100 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SYSTEM UPGRADE (Protected/Permissive Signal Heads) Circulation Project Project Description: This project will install protected/permissive traffic signal heads, on new signal poles and signal mast arms, relocate existing equipment and modify existing striping and raised medians at the following three (3) intersections: Margarita Road at Verdes Lane, Redhawk Parkway at Paseo Parallon/Overland Trail, and Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle. Benefit: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Project is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-09 / 610 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 3,418 61,582 65,000 5804-Construction 597,900 597,900 5805-Construction Engineering 21,000 21,000 5802-Design & Environmental 79,430 23,570 103,000 Total Expenditures 82,848 704,052 786,900 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 489,510 489,510 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 92,390 205,000 297,390 Total Funding 92,390 694,510 786,900 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 101 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country YNEZ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes widening the easterly side of Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road north roughly 1600 feet, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and striped medians, in coordination with adjacent development. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important arterial road in this part of the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction is anticipated in FY 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-02 / 534 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 752 391,970 392,722 5804-Construction 1,299,628 980,372 2,280,000 5805-Construction Engineering 158,172 158,172 5802-Design & Environmental 42,007 1,003,271 1,045,278 5806-MSHCP 54,200 65,800 120,000 Total Expenditures 42,759 2,907,241 1,046,172 3,996,172 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 435,750 435,750 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 42,759 (3,509) 1,046,172 1,085,422 4025-Grants 2,475,000 2,475,000 Total Funding 478,509 2,471,491 1,046,172 3,996,172 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. Grants Funding Source reflects the 2023 RCTC Western Riverside County Regional call for projects using Measure A Regional Arterial (MARA) grant funds for $1,475,000 and the California State Assembly Bill (AB) 102 grant for $1,000,000. 2. Developer Contribution reflects fees paid by the Rancho Highlands Development for this project. 102 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country YNEZ ROAD IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes widening Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscaped medians, street lights and modification of the traffic signal at Santiago Road. This project will be separated into two phases, with phase IIA is between Rancho Vista Road and Santiago Road. Phase 116 will be between Santiago Road and La Paz Street. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important arterial road in this part of the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Phase IIA will be initiated when Phase I is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-17 / 535 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 Budget Projected Projected 2027-28 Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 92,974 100,000 200,000 200,000 592,974 5804-Construction 1,260,817 1,900,923 3,161,740 5805-Construction Engineering 65,000 100,000 165,000 5802-Design & Environmental 254,281 189,123 285,138 728,542 5806-MSHCP 63,041 95,046 158,087 Total Expenditures 1 347,2551 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,1071 4,806,343 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 4452-Unspecified 619,451 (272,196) 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 347,255 4,459,088 Total Funding 619,451 (272,196) 289,123 1,588,858 2,581,107 4,806,343 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 103 • U'1• rrr ..Sao ..71 aa" 7 Asa. rq ri rppi Mom• F 1 '� Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Housing Projects +O E O �y ? CA a SAND R � L ORNIA RD �O G Z R }1'cc s i Reference Map O Z y O 2 Map ID Description 1 Habitat for Humanity - Old Town Units 2 Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project 3 Uptown Temecula Affordable Housing Site 4 Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project 106 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - OLD TOWN UNITS Housing Project Project Description: A project for Habitat for Humanity to construction six for -sale affordable/workforce housing units for low income buyers adjacent to previously constructed units located on parcels 922062010 and 922062016. Benefit: Upon completion, the City will have an additional 6 affordable housing units, which will serve moderate and low income residents. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: The project is currently in preliminary discussions with the City, County of Riverside, and other funding partners. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.AH22-01 / 827 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 1,261,000 1,261,000 Total Expenditures 1,261,000 1,261,000 Source of Funds: 4165-Affordable Housing 4299-Contribution of Land 700,000 561,000 700,000 561,000 Total Funding - 1,261,000 1,261,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes 1. 4165 Affordable Housing reflects bond proceeds from the 2017 refinancing of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) 2010 and 2011 Tax Allocation Housing Bonds 107 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country LAS HACIENDAS AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT Housing Project Project Description: This project will provide funding for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas, located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area. Funding for this project includes: a $8,910,698 Capital Loan from the available proceeds of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency 2017E Series Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds; a $718,445 Deferred Fee Loan for Development Impact Fees, Quimby, permit, Public Works and Fire fees related to the project; and a $500,857 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee reimbursement for the costs of completing a new road connecting Las Haciendas and Calle Cortez. Benefit: Upon completion, the City will have an additional 76 affordable housing units and one manager's unit. The affordable units will be available to extremely low, very low and low-income households. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2023 -24. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.AH2O-01 / 817 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 7,947,784 2,182,216 10,130,000 Total Expenditures 7, 47,7841 2,182,216 10,130,000 Source of Funds: 4165-Affordable Housing 7,947,784 1,681,359 9,629,143 4259-Uptown Temecula New Streets 500,857 500,857 In Lieu Fee Total Funding 7,947,784 2,182,216 10,130,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. Affordable Housing reflects bond proceeds from the 2017 refinancing of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency 2010 and 2011 Tax Allocation Housing Bonds, paid with property tax increment collected within the boundaries of the former Redevelopment Agency. The bond issuances reflect interest rates ranging between 2-5% and fully mature by 12/15/2039. 108 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country UPTOWN TEMECULA AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITE Housing Project Project Description: The City of Temecula as Housing Successor to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency is the owner of vacant land located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City plans to go through a request for proposal (RFP) and partner with an affordable housing developer, who will bring a high -quality affordable housing product to this area. The parcel is approximately 1.83 acres of land that is located near planned recreation areas, which will provide various amenities to the future residents of this affordable development. The future affordable development will assist the City in accomplishing the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan which intends to transform a suburban oriented commercial district into an urban mixed -use environment. This project is located near Jefferson Ave and the northern City limit (APN: 910-262-061). Benefit: Providing affordable/workforce housing to the community. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is in the initial stages of planning, with a potential request for proposal or other solicitation in the future. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.AH23-01 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5802-Design & Environmental 2,300,000 2,300,000 Total Expenditures 2,300,000 2,300,000 Source of Funds: 4110-Community Reinvestment 1,000,000 1,000,000 Program 4299-Contribution of Land 1,300,000 1,300,000 Total Funding - 2,300,000 2,300,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes: 1. The 4299 Contribution of Land amount will ultimately be determined by an independent market appraisal of the land at a point in time when the land is about to be transferred. 109 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country VINE CREEK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT Housing Project Project Description: A Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for Vine Creek Apartments, a 100% affordable, 60 unit development, was approved by the City Council in June 2019. The City pledged to contribute $6.71 million towards the project, including $698,281 in a deferred fee loan, $5,301,719 permanent loan, and $710,000 purchase loan. The Deferred Fee Loan of $698,281 consists of deferred Development Impact Fees (DIF), QUIMBY fees, permit fees, Public Works fees, and Fire fees for the Project, locked in at 2018-19 amounts. The Permanent Loan is limited to $1,301,719 in funds received by the City from Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (SERAF) Repayments, which have recently been approved by the State Department of Finance as part of the ROPS for the SARDA, and $4,000,000 in Community Reinvestment Program Funds. The Purchase Money Loan of $710,000 reflects the purchase price of the Real Property to be paid by the Developer to the City. Benefit: Upon completion, the City will have an additional 60 affordable housing units, all of which will be at 60% of the area median income (AMI) or lower. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: The developer has secured tax credits and the project is expected to start construction in 2023. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.AH2O-02 / 820 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 6,710,000 6,710,000 Total Expenditures 6,710,000 6,710,000 Source of Funds: 4165-Affordable Housing 2,710,000 2,710,000 4110-Community Reinvestment 4,000,000 4,000,000 Program Total Funding - 6,710,000 6,710,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Affordable Housing funds represent the Supplemental Educational Revenue Augmentation (SERAF) repayments received by the City. 110 O1/ L`v ■ 'J m J'l • I® 5� 1 !`T.. � I /ham `� ` s �a I r •' 1 r tl Y � � � f -.. � �„�r ,oii� ' _� `�� } �1S�i P't Ak IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Infrastructure Projects NI4pLAg RO 00 0 0t E t\O O O Rtly 6 Y ?P a F 4, oEL� g4e �. DR O S �vpND COLANA WY C R D m O MA RCP � 90 IA RD p 4p,1,IFORN �O 4 0 O P4+ gy( NPa O VISTp� e O 'POO �q0 C, p PVSA RO 7C • � v C `i O� • 3 PN t1AG0 D � AD O� O 2 y0 r � A O 2 • T3 ORSOLARO OEQ PKV,Iy RA&C414 �, 'CEME4ULp JP A F� 9 K PKy q` JP� Pao v 0 �y Z• O v v ao Map ID Description i Map ID Description 1 Auto Mall Wayfinding Signs 17 Murrieta Creek Improvements 2 Bike Lane & Trail Program - Great Oak Trail Lighting 18 Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail 3 Bike Lane & Trail Program - RRSP Trails 19 Old Town Parking Structure 4 Bike Lane and Trail Program- Temecula Creek SS Trail 20 Old Town Security Camera & Sound System 5 Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovation 21 Old Town Temecula Parklets Program 6 Community Wildfire Protection Plan 22 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail 7 Fire Station 73 Gym/Garage 23 Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II - Margarita Undercrossing 8 Fire Station 84 Renovation 24 Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements 9 I-15/SR 79 South Interchange Landscaping 25 Sidewalks - Third Street 10 I-15 Corridor Branding and Visioning Improvments 26 Sidewalks - Pauba Road 11 Library Alternate Emergency Operations Center 27 Sixth Street Improvements 12 Library Technology Enhancements 28 South Side Senior Center for Active Adults 13 Margarita Recreation Center 29 Temecula Creek Fencing 14 Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator 30 Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool Renovation 15 Mary Phillips Senior Center Renovation 31 Traffic Signal - Promenade Mall Ring Road 16 Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area 112 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Implementation will utilize the recently completed Transition Plan and implement its recommendations based on the established priorities. The implementation will include improvements to public facilities, programs, and public rights of way to modify/remove identified barriers over a fiscally constrained framework. Benefit: This project furthers the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community, Transportation Mobility and Connectivity, as well as Equity. Core Value: Equity Project Status: The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Upgrade was completed in Fiscal Year 2017-18. The implementation of the Transition Plan recommendation is an ongoing program. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW18-16 / 612 Level: I ADA Compliant Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected 2027-28 Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 127,703 226,294 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 78,660 747,297 5804-Construction 1,275 560,909 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 2,187,184 5805-Construction Engineering 37,500 37,500 5802-Design & Environmental 49,816 62,684 112,500 Total Expenditures 178,794 887,387 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 3,084,481 Source of Funds: 4140-CDBG 4002-Measure S 134,574 602,947 328,660 325,000 78,660 325,000 78,660 325,000 78,660 325,000 78,660 325,000 78,660 2,362,521 721,960 Total Funding 134,574 931,607 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 403,660 3,084,481 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. This is the master CDBG project. The City receives approximately $325,000 in CDBG funds annually used for construction. The City match is approximately $78,660 for design and administration. 113 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country AUTO MALL WAYFINDING SIGNS Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Description: This project will design and install wayfinding signs for V the Auto mall. Several wayfinding signs will be installed at key locations. Benefit: Installation of the wayfinding signs will assist patrons and the public to easily find their destinations. Core Value: Economic Prosperity Project Status: This project is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.CM22-01 / 790 Level: II 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 155,000 155,000 5805-Construction Engineering 15,000 15,000 5802-Design & Environmental 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 200,000 200,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 200,000 200,000 Total Funding 200,000 200,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 114 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Bike Lane and Trail Program Prior Year Actual Expenditures Various Projects - Bike Lane and Trail Program North General Kearney Trail Long Canyon Creek Trail Yukon to Ynez Future Projects Future Projects City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Total Project Cost Year $ 256,463 $ 19,857 $ 72,177 Total $ 348,497 $ 84,420 2023-24 $ 143,830 2024-25 $ 143,830 $ 151,664 2025-26 Total $ 151,664 2026-27 $ 1,144,558 Total $ 1,307,112 $ 174,225 Total $ 174,225 $ 186,595 Total $ 186,595 2,396,343 Prior Year Actual Expenditures $ 348,497 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Adjusted $ 84,420 Fiscal Year 2023-24 $ 143,830 Fiscal Year 2024-25 $ 151,664 Fiscal Year 2025-26 $ 1,307,112 Fiscal Year 2026-27 $ 174,225 Fiscal Year 2026-27 $ 186,595 TOTAL: $ 2,396,343 2027-28 2028-29 Funding Source AB 2766 Beyond Grant DIF - Open Space & Trails AB 2766 AB 2766 AB 2766 AB 2766 Unspecified AB 2766 AB 2766 115 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: The Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan was completed in Fiscal Year 2015-16. The Plan includes new trail and bikeway information sheets detailing constraints, solutions, surface types, widths, and estimated construction costs. The City is a Silver Level Bicycle Friendly Community and this project allows for continued implementation of facilities and programs, which further the City's commitment to proving a safe and convenient network that connects schools, parks, open space, shopping, and employment centers. Benefit: This project provides alternative modes of transportation and increases connectivity and accessibility to Old Town, Wine Country, and the City's many schools, parks, trails, and open space areas. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: Improvements will be made on an ongoing basis as funding becomes available. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.CD18-01 / 703 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program _Ji 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 6,712 (360,260) (353,548) 5804-Construction 122,263 226,759 143,830 151,664 1,307,112 174,225 186,595 2,312,447 5802-Design & Environmental 219,523 1 217,921 437,444 Total Expenditures 348,498 84,419 143,830 151,664 1,307,112 174,225 186,595 2,396,343 Source of Funds: 4427-Assembly Bill 2766 256,463 84,420 143,830 151,664 162,554 174,225 186,595 1,159,751 4478-Beyond Grant 19,857 19,857 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 72,177 72,177 4452-Unspecified 1,144,558 1,144,558 Total Funding 348,497 84,420 143,830 151,664 1,307,112 174,225 186,595 2,396,343 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 116 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - GREAT OAK TRAIL LIGHTING Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road (approximately 1.70 miles, or 8,976 feet). Benefit: This project improves pedestrian and biking experience and enhances safety along the subject trail. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This is currently in the design phase. Construction is anticipated in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-16 / 768 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 48,300 56,700 105,000 5804-Construction 632,000 23,058 655,058 5805-Construction Engineering 30,000 30,000 5802-Design & Environmental 30,000 30,000 5806-MSH CP 31,600 1,150 32,750 Total Expenditures 48,300 780,300 24,208 852,808 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4528-Service Level C - Zone 28 48,300 328,600 24,208 451,700 352,808 500,000 Total Funding 48,300 780,300 24,208 852,808 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 117 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK TRAILS Infrastructure Project Project Description: The project includes the design and construction of multi -use trails in the area between Ronald Reagan Sports Park to the north, Pauba Road to the south, Margarita Road to the east, and border of the park to the west. Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs, parks, trails, and facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Scoping, environmental assessment and preliminary concept in FY2023-24. Design and initiate construction in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-05 / 793 Level: II 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 715 179,285 180,000 5804-Construction 1,320,000 1,320,000 5802-Design & Environmental 58,4181 541,582 600,000 Total Expenditures 59,133 2,040,867 2,100,000 Source of Funds: 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 59,133 70,000 129,133 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 930,867 930,867 4240-DIF-Quimby 690,000 690,000 4002-Measure S 350,000 350,000 Total Funding 59,133 2,040,867 21100,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 118 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - TEMECULA CREEK SOUTH SIDE TRAIL Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes an agreement with Riverside County Flood Control to install new gates, pave and stripe an existing maintenance road for a Class I Trail. The route would parallel Temecula Creek on the South side, connecting Butterfield Stage Road to Loma Linda Road, terminating at the alignment with Avenida de Missiones. This section of trail is part of the proposed seventeen (17) mile Temecula Loop Trail identified in the Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. Benefit: This section of trail would satisfy the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, Transportation Mobility and Connectivity, and A Sustainable City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Design is anticipated to be complete in FY2024-25. The City will continue to pursue outside funding sources for construction. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-11 / 720 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 173,447 187,365 175,000 535,812 5804-Construction 7,827,000 7,827,000 5805-Construction Engineering 200,000 200,000 5802-Design & Environmental 276,710 385,197 661,907 5806-MSHCP 391,350 391,350 Total Expenditures 450,157 572,562 8,593,350 9,616,069 Source of Funds: 4427-Assembly Bill 2766 67,845 67,845 4002-Measure S 382,311 572,563 954,874 4452-Unspecified 8,593,350 8,593,350 Total Funding 450,156 572,563 8,593,350 9,616,069 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 119 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country BIKE LANE UPGRADES - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will install greenback bike lane pavement markings/legends on various bicycle corridors throughout the City. Benefit: This project improves bicycle safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-10 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 25,000 25,000 5804-Construction 249,500 249,500 Total Expenditures 274,500 274,500 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 224,550 224,550 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 49,950 49,950 Total Funding - 274,500 274,500 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Highway Safety Improvement Program - Cycle 11 awarded on March 9, 2023 2. City match is $24,550 based on the HSIP application and grant. Additional appropriated local funds are for administration 120 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country BRIDGE MAINTENANCE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will remedy deficiencies in bridges to keep them safe for motorists. The work can include, but is not limited to bridge deck surface treatment, crack sealing, rubber seal replacement, rail replacement, and scour protection. In accordance with US Code 23 U.S.C. 151 (U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration), States' Department of Transportation (Caltrans in California) are responsible for inspecting all public highway bridges within the State, except federal and tribal ones, for compliance with the National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS). Caltrans provides the City with annual inspection reports of all bridges in Temecula. The City is responsible for fixing deficiencies of bridges within its jurisdiction. Benefit: This project maintains the City's bridges Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: PWBM-05-01/PW23-08 will address the maintenance needs at five (5) bridges passing over Santa Gertrudis Creek at Jefferson Avenue, Ynez Road, Winchester Road, North General Kearny Road, and Liefer Road. Construction is expected to take place in Fall of 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWBM-05 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 81,360 81,360 81,360 244,080 5804-Construction 360,000 360,000 360,000 1,080,000 5805-Construction Engineering 10,800 10,800 10,800 32,400 5802-Design & Environmental 36,000 36,000 36,000 108,000 Total Expenditures 488,160 - 488,160 - 488,160 1,464,480 Source of Funds: 4170-Measure A 488,160 488,160 488,160 1,464,480 Total Funding 488,160 - 488,160 - 488,160 1,464,480 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 121 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation projects at City owned and operated facilities such as the Pat Birdsall Sports Park Concessionaire Building, Old Town Parking Garage, CRC Amphitheater, CRC Audio Systems, Temecula SAFE House, exterior painting of Chapel of Memories, LED lighting fixture retrofits at various sites, rehabilitation of facility parking lots. The rehabilitation projects could include, but are not limited to, parking lot lighting replacements, heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) upgrades, roof repairs, carpet and flooring replacement, cabinet re-facing/replacement, concrete repairs, replacement of fencing and repair of swimming pools. Benefit: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life of facilities, and upgrades aging facility components. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitation projects are completed on an ongoing basis as funding becomes available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFR-11 / 701 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected 2027-28 Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 158,660 158,660 5804-Construction 3,251,133 1,522,846 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 9,773,980 5802-Design & Environmental 46,026 46,026 5601-Furnishings & Equipment 10,719 4,281 15,000 5809-Information Technology 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 3,466,539 1,527,127 1,030,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,023,666 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 250,000 30,000 280,000 4350-Facilities Replacement Fund 1,466,540 1,527,126 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,993,666 4001-General Fund 1,750,000 1,750,000 Total Funding 3,466,540 1,527,126 1,030,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 10,023,666 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 122 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CITY FACILITY SECURITY Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project provides for security enhancements to the City's public buildings to ensure the safety of the public and employee population. Projects to include, but are not limited to, installation of security glass, keyless entry access improvements, security bollards, enhanced lighting, and vehicular and pedestrian security gates. Benefit: To protect property and life. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Projects to be completed as funding is available. Department: -Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFS-08 / 779 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 25,000 25,000 5804-Construction 67,926 132,074 200,000 5802-Design & Environmental 15,300 19,700 125,000 Total Expenditures 1 73,226 176,774 250,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 100,000 150,000 250,000 Total Funding 1 100,000 150,000 250,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 123 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CITY SECURITY CAMERA SYSTEM Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Description: The City Security Camera System will be utilized by the City to support public safety, traffic management, and asset protection activities in service to its citizens. The City's goal for the system is to standardize and integrate existing and new video management systems to provide video technology to improve overall safety and security to the residents of the City. L, Benefit: To protect property and life. This project provides Police the ability to perform virtual patrols, maximizing staff efficiency and resources. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Information Technology - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17 -01 / 711 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 2,593 2,593 5804-Construction 3,192,607 1,157,885 4,350,492 5802-Design & Environmental 138,347 1 353 1138,700 Total Expenditures 3,333,547 1,158,238 4,491,785 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 752,087 752,087 4256-DIF-Police Facilities 1,121,113 1,121,113 4002-Measure S 2,018,585 600,000 2,618,585 Total Funding 3,891,785 600,000 4,491,785 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 650,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the ongoing software and equipment maintenance associated with the infrastructure of the security camera system, as well as video storage in accordance with the City's retention policy. 124 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CITYWIDE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will prepare a report that shows all drainage courses within the City and existing drainage improvements that have been constructed to control storm runoff. In addition, the project will include a master hydrology study showing the anticipated storm flows at build -out. Benefit: The Master Drainage Plan will provide the City with sufficient up-to- date and accurate information to systematically plan and manage its drainage systems and provide higher level of flood protection to its residents, communities, properties, and infrastructure investments. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Drainage system information has been collected. Data base has been compiled and integrated into Geographic Information System (GIS). Master hydrology and site specific hydraulics is complete. Analysis and evaluation of capital improvement projects will continue into FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-16 / 722 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 102,139 22,861 39,000 164,000 5802-Design & Environmental 158,708 1 441,292 600,000 Total Expenditures 260,847 464,153 39,000 764,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 260,847 464,153 39,000 764,000 Total Funding 1 260,847 464,153 39,000 764,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 125 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CITYWIDE FINANCIAL SYSTEM UPGRADE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the implementation costs associated with the upgrade of the City's Financial Accounting System. The City's current system was implemented in 2001, and a successor Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solution is available. The ERP system will integrate with existing software platform used Citywide and will provide upgraded core applications for financial management and human resource management. Benefit: This project increases efficiencies, accountability and transparency of the City's financial, accounting and human resource information. Core Value: Accountable and Responsive City Government Project Status: The implementation of the Financial modules were completed in FY2023-24. The Human Resources and Payroll module will commence in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.FN19-01 / 724 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5809-Information Technology 616,809 759,909 1,376,718 Total Expenditures 616,809 759,909 1,376,718 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund - 4002-Measure S 500,000 113,184 613,184 4325-Technology Replacement Fund 763,534 763,534 Total Funding 500,000 876,718 1,376,718 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 1 86,000 86,000 86,000 86,000 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect ongoing software maintenance for new Financial System. 126 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program CITYWIDE STREETLIGHT ACQUISITION & LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) RETROFIT Infrastructure Project Project Description: Phase I of this project acquired the Southern California Edison (SCE) owned streetlights within the City's boundary, including the light poles, mast arms, and light fixtures. Phase II of this project includes retrofitting the purchased lights with a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system. Benefit: This project provides for the opportunity to reduce facilities costs, reduce energy usage, and extend the life of lighting infrastructure. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: Project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-18 / 688 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 72 491 563 5804-Construction 189,095 189,095 5610-Equipment 7,781,591 32,061 7,813,652 Total Expenditures 7,970,759 32,552 8,003,311 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 4002-Measure S 2,503,311 5,500,000 2,503,311 5,500,000 Total Funding 8,003,311 8,003,311 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs (695,564) (709,475) (723,665) (738,138) Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance savings represents a combination of energy savings realized from the conversion to LED light bulbs, as well as reduced electricity rates charged by SCE after the City acquires the streetlights. 127 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) RENOVATIONS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project facilitates the rehabilitation of the CRC, including the expansion and reconfiguration of the teen center; renovation of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Phase 1 includes full repair, maintenance, and updating to current standards. Phases 2 and 3 include expansion and improvements throughout the facility. Benefit: This project will create a safe, engaging place for teens to participate in a variety of activities, while also providing necessary renovations to the facility. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Phase 1 construction and Phase 2 design in FY2023-24. Phase 2 construction and Phase 3 design in FY2024-25. Phase 3 construction in FY2025-26. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-07 / 730 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 373,356 68,127 231,873 673,356 5804-Construction 3,797,251 4,253,838 4,010,838 12,061,927 5805-Construction Engineering 252,464 304,395 423,752 980,611 5802-Design & Environmental 389,676 595,767 185,600 1,171,043 5809-Information Technology 56,637 743,363 800,000 Total Expenditures 4,869,385 5,965,489 - 4,852,063 15,686,937 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 750,000 750,000 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 1,521,208 400,000 2,457,795 4,379,003 4240-DIF-Quimby 2, 353,952 1,096,640 3,450,592 4002-Measure S 862,473 3,850,601 2,394,268 7,107,342 Total Funding 4,737,633 6,097,241 - 4,852,063 15,686,937 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution reflects the extraordinary community benefit payment from the Heirloom Farms development. 128 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Infrastructure Project Project Description: The Community Wildfire Protection Plan, entitled Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan, will utilize the highest -risk and most complex property within the City of Temecula as a model for how to develop comprehensive planning for other properties subject to fire risk throughout the City. Benefit: The project is critically needed for 177 acres in Temecula Creek within the Very High Fire Severity Zone. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) would be reduced with a plan to prevent wildfires, reduce burn area and protect the adjacent 28,491 acres and 3,048 structures worth an estimated $1.5 billion. The City will use this plan in other fire risk areas with sensitive habitat, and share it statewide to deter even more fires to reduce GHG. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: The project is currently underway. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.CD23-01 / 772 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 46,095 331,905 378,000 Total Expenditures 46,095 331,905 378,000 Source of Funds: 4025-Grants 378,000 378,000 Total Funding 378,000 378,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Funding Source is CalFire Grant No. 5GG20167 129 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Infrastructure Project Project Description: California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive General Plan as the fundamental policy document for future development. It provides the framework for management and utilization of the City's physical, economic, and human resources. This document guides civic decisions regarding land use, conservation of existing housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provisions of supporting infrastructure and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human -caused hazards. The City's General Plan was last updated in 2005. The General Plan will serve as the blueprint for the community for approximately the next fifteen years. This project will update all of the elements of the General Plan and will also include the implementation of new legislation to ensure compliance with State Law. Benefit: The General Plan update satisfies all six of the City's core values: Healthy and Livable City; Economic Prosperity; Safe and Prepared Community; Sustainable City; Transportation, Mobility, and Connectivity; and Accountable and Responsive Local Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is ongoing. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-02 / 777 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 481,212 1,028,788 1,510,000 5802-Design & Environmental 3,9601 696,040 500,000 500,000 1,700,000 Total Expenditures 485,172 1,724,828 500,000 500,000 3,210,000 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 4025-Grants 1,000,000 310,000 400,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,400,000 810,000 Total Funding 1,310,000 900,000 500,000 500,000 3,210,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 130 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Infrastructure Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. Grants funding includes: $500,000 in Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP) funding provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and $310,000 in Senate Bill 2 Planning Grant. 2. In addition to these grants, $175,000 in funding has been granted through the Sustainable Communities Program, which supplemented Planning Department operating funds to start the General Plan update process and was reflected in account 001.161.999.5248. This grant was used for CEQA VMT analysis for Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, as required by SB743. 131 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country ELECTRIC VEHICLES CHARGING STATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of improvements to accommodate, procure, and install electric vehicle service equipment (EVSE), more commonly known as "charging stations" at various City facilities. Benefit: This project encourages alternative transportation options. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: Installations at the Park & Ride on Temecula Parkway, Sixth Street parking lot, parking structure on Mercedes Street, and at the Mike Naggar Community Park are complete. Installation of 8 charging stations at the City's Field Operations Center is scheduled for Winter 2024. One new site will be identified for FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-09 / 683 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 42,835 47,165 90,000 5804-Construction 172,138 230,591 402,729 Total Expenditures 214,973 277,757 492,729 Source of Funds: 4427-Assembly Bill 2766 47,000 47,000 4665-MSRC-Mobile Source Air Review 141,000 141,000 Committee Grant 4438-Reimbursements 5,800 5,800 4145-TEAM 115,807 183,122 298,929 Total Funding 162,807 329,922 492,729 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 132 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM UPGRADE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will install fiber optic communication system upgrades including conduit, cable, closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras, traffic signal controllers and related communication equipment to improve safety and operations with optimized traffic signal timing coordination. Various signalized intersections will be improved along the Winchester Road, Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway corridors. Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's fiber optic communication and traffic signal system equipment. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW18-05 / 550 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 4,392 10,362 14,754 5804-Construction 783,100 59,346 842,446 5805-Construction Engineering 283,651 1,949 285,600 5802-Design & Environmental 119,770 30 119,800 5601-Furnishings & Equipment 338,548 52 338,600 Total Expenditures 1,529,4601 71,739 1,601,200 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 771,019 437,181 1,208,200 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 393,000 393,000 Total Funding 1,164,019 437,181 1,601,200 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Highway Safety Improvement Program - HSIPL-5459(026) 133 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will provide for the design and installation of fiber optic cable and conduit at various locations throughout the City. Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's fiber optic communications and traffic signal system equipment throughout the City, including preparation of a Communications System Master Plan to guide the implementation of future communications and technology improvements connecting traffic signals, facilities and other infrastructure throughout the City. This project will enhance the City's core value of a safe and prepared community, as well as transportation mobility and connectivity as it relates to traffic signal communication. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Project was initiated in Fiscal Year 2021-22 and is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFO-21 / 789 Level: I Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 100,000 40,000 31,000 12,000 10,000 5,000 198,000 5804-Construction 367,000 286,000 113,000 90,000 50,000 906,000 5802-Design & Environmental 89,418 1 410,583 500,000 Total Expenditures 89,418 510,583 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 1,604,000 Source of Funds: 4256-DIF-Police Facilities 4002-Measure S 89,418 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 510,582 1,004,000 600,000 Total Funding 89,418 510,582 407,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 55,000 1,604,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 134 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FIRE STATION 73 GYM/GARAGE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will consist of adding a 2nd garage in the rear of the property to park the squad and Urban Search and Rescue (USR) vehicle, along with a gym and storage rooms. Benefit: This improvement to the station will allow for the station crew to stay at the facility to workout on a daily basis. The addition of the garage will offer an outside storage with roof to house the squad USR to reduce the wear and tear on these vehicles. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This project will be designed in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Fire - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-13 / 697 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 2026-27 Projected Projected 2027-28 2028-29 Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 102,179 87,821 105,000 111,000 406,000 5804-Construction 117,990 10,165 2,811,875 2,940,030 5805-Construction Engineering 350,000 350,000 5802-Design & Environmental 84,396 297,829 10,000 392,225 5806-MSHCP 147,002 147,002 Total Expenditures 304,565 395,815 115,000 3,419,877 4,235,257 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 43,651 43,651 4246-DIF-Fire Protection Facilities 103,336 24,000 127,336 4002-Measure S 304,565 292,479 47,349 3,419,877 4,064,270 Total Funding 304,565 395,815 115,000 3,419,877 4,235,257 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 135 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FIRE STATION 84 RENOVATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction and renovation of Fire Station #84, including upgrades to the training room. This fire station serves as the headquarter station for the City of Temecula Fire Department. This renovation will give a fresh look to the station as well as update the facility to be more energy efficient. The renovation will add a gym to the facility, upgrade electrical, upgrade the windows, and re -paint the exterior and interior of the station. The living quarters will also receive some renovations to the bathrooms, kitchen and day room. Benefit: This improvement will create a better learning experience for our community members that attend classes for training. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This project will be constructed in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Fire - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-14 / 687 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 193,022 110,728 100,000 403,750 5804-Construction 1,850 1,502,661 450,798 1,955,309 5805-Construction Engineering 60,000 60,000 5802-Design & Environmental 145,577 75,438 221,015 5809-Information Technology 85,000 85,000 Total Expenditures 340,4501 1,748,826 635,798 2,725,074 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 85,000 85,000 4246-DIF-Fire Protection Facilities 448,248 448,248 4002-Measure S 666,750 974,278 550,798 2,191,826 Total Funding 666,750 1,422,526 635,798 2,725,074 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 136 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program I-15/STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH INTERCHANGE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING Infrastructure Project Project Description: The project includes the landscape beautification of the west side of the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (Temecula Parkway) interchange with enhanced landscaping & hardscape inspired by the 1-15 Branding & Visioning Plan. Benefit: This project meets the City-wide long-term goals as identified in the Quality of Life Master Plan to include a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is in the design phase with construction scheduled for Summer 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-19 / 690 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 141,751 60,827 71,812 274,390 5804-Construction 2,480,000 2,480,000 5805-Construction Engineering 350,000 350,000 5802-Design & Environmental 340,889 185,016 525,905 Total Expenditures 482,640 3,075,843 71,812 3,630,295 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4078-Reimbursement-Pechanga IGA 441,350 2,500,000 617,133 71,812 1,130,295 2,500,000 Total Funding 2,941,350 617,133 71,812 3,630,295 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 60,830 62,046 63,289 65,188 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the ongoing irrigation and landscape maintenance required by CalTrans. 137 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program INTERSTATE 15 CORRIDOR BRANDING AND VISIONING IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the beautification of the Interstate 15 Corridor within the City of Temecula limits by implementing the 1-15 Branding and Visioning Plan. The improvements include, but are not limited to, enhanced and themed landscaping, gateway monumentations, sculptures, interchanges focal art, and bridge treatments. The project will be implemented in phases and as funds become available. The initial appropriation is to develop a phasing plan in coordination with the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Benefit: This project will beautify the 1-15 Corridor within the City and promote the Temecula brand. Core Value: Economic Prosperity Project Status: Project not yet started. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWBV-24 Level: I -15 BRANDING & VISIONING 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 200,000 5802-Design & Environmental 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 600,000 Total Expenditures 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4452-Unspecified 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 Total Funding - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 138 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program LIBRARY ALTERNATE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER ENHANCEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library was opened in 2006 to serve the residents of Temecula and surrounding areas. In 2021, the Library was designated as the City of Temecula's Alternate Emergency Operations Center (A-EOC). This project will enhance the library's current technology offerings to provide for a secure, reliable, state-of-the-art equipment for conducting emergency operations. Benefit: This project will equip the library with the requisite technology to provide for an operational Alternate Emergency Operations Center. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Project is expected to be completed during Fiscal Year 2024- 25. Department: Information Technology - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.NEW (IT24-02 ) Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5809-Information Technology 700,000 700,000 Total Expenditures 700,000 700,000 Source of Funds: 4247-DIF-Library Facilities I I 700,000 I 700,000 Total Funding 700,000 700,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 139 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY ENHANCEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library was opened in 2006 to serve the residents of Temecula and surrounding areas. Since then, it has become the busiest Library in the Riverside County System and offers advanced technology services to its patrons. This project will replace aging equipment and enhance the library's technology offerings to ensure that the patrons have access to a secure, reliable, state-of-the-art facility for many years to come. Benefit: This project will offer improvements to the patron experience and to the reliability of the library technology systems. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is expected to be complete during Fiscal Year 2024- 25. Department: Information Technology - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.NEW (IT24-01) Level: City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5540-Information Technology 240,000 240,000 Total Expenditures 240,000 240,000 Source of Funds: 4247-DIF-Library Facilities 240,000 240,000 Total Funding 240,000 240,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 140 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project consists of the construction of a new recreation center in Mike Naggar Community Park in place of the former YMCA building. The project includes the demolition of the existing building and pool, constructing a new building and pool was determined by a Community Needs Assessment and available budget. The Information Technology component includes camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified technology needs. Benefit: This project will provide the City a new facility to meet the increasing demands of recreational programs. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Construction was completed in December of 2023. The facility is scheduled to be fully open to the public in Spring of 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-21 / 692 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 408,405 28,252 436,657 5804-Construction 6,520,847 3,494,885 10,015,732 5805-Construction Engineering 4,739 1,907 6,646 5802-Design & Environmental 996,689 278,994 1,275,682 5809-Information Technology 456,594 410,196 866,790 Total Expenditures 8,387,274 4,214,234 12,601,508 Source of Funds: 4481-Capital Financing 6,405,000 6,405,000 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 600,000 600,000 4256-DIF-Police Facilities 111,256 25,744 137,000 4002-Measure S 1,636,773 3,822,735 5,459,508 Total Funding 8,753,029 3,848,479 12,601,508 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 1 1 1,435,233 1,488,628 1,544,079 1,603,5041 Notes : 1. Capital Financing reflects the Temecula Public Financing Authority's 2018 Lease Financing arrangement which provides $6.4M in funding, with a term of 15 years at an interest rate of 3.42%, repaid by the General Fund. (Loan Paid off in 2022) 2. Future Operating and Maintenance costs reflect the staffing, utilities and other service costs and are reflected in the Temecula Community Services District 5-Year Financial Forecast. 141 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER EMERGENCY GENERATOR Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project is to design and install an energy efficient emergency generator at the Mary Phillips Senior Center (MPSC) to provide back-up electrical services in the event of an extended electrical shutdown, due to a local disaster or service outage. Benefit: This project will provide for enhanced public safety at the MPSC in the event of a local emergency which may disrupt electrical services. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: The project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-08 / 771 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 28,594 28,594 5804-Construction 175,974 19,628 195,602 5802-Design & Environmental 11,743 11,743 Total Expenditures 216,311 19,628 235,939 Source of Funds: 4025-Grants 4002-Measure S 185,000 31,311 19,628 185,000 50,939 Total Funding 216,311 19,628 235,939 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Grant funding source reflects grant from California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES) Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) Community Power Resiliency Allocation Program. 142 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER ENHANCEMENT AND RENOVATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Exterior improvements include new roof, siding, soffit, fascia, trim, doors and windows. Interior improvements include lighting, acoustics, trim, flooring, bookcase, and finishes. The project includes improvements in accessibility throughout the building interior and site in accordance with latest ADA requirements. Benefit: This project updates and enhances the appearance and improves safety and extends the life of the facility. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW20-13 / 782 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 256,147 146,203 402,350 5804-Construction 825,233 827,969 1,653,202 5805-Construction Engineering 84,575 55,135 139,710 5802-Design & Environmental 86,670 7,757 94,427 Total Expenditures 1,252,624 1,037,065 2,289,689 Source of Funds: 4140-CDBG 218,959 838,625 1,057,584 4350-Facilities Replacement Fund 279,694 279,694 4002-Measure S 249,024 703,387 952,411 Total Funding 747,677 1,542,012 2,289,689 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 143 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a multi -use outdoor recreational area adjacent to the Mary Phillips Senior Center. In addition, the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units will be replaced. The multi -use outdoor recreational area could include a shuffleboard court and other court -based activities. Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs and facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-08 / 796 Level: II Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 91,598 3,402 95,000 5804-Construction 73,922 594,746 668,668 5805-Construction Engineering 6,992 18,008 25,000 5802-Design & Environmental 70,014 4,986 75,000 Total Expenditures 242,526 621,142 863,668 Source of Funds: 4169-CDBG-CV2 4002-Measure S 40,993 622,675 200,000 663,668 200,000 Total Funding 40,993 822,675 863,668 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 144 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program MEDIANS & TRAFFIC CALMING IMPROVEMENTS - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of raised concrete medians (with stamped concrete), neighborhood identification medians, pedestrian bulb -outs, striping improvements and other features to provide neighborhood traffic calming at various locations throughout the City. Benefit: This project provides neighborhood traffic calming, enhances pedestrian, bicycle safety and the quality of life at various locations within the City. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This project has a priority list of locations and will be constructed in priority order. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWTC-20 / 704 Level: II Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 45,000 10,000 55,000 5804-Construction 77,898 479,003 200,000 756,900 5805-Construction Engineering 30,000 20,000 50,000 5802-Design & Environmental 29,900 65,100 20,000 115,000 Total Expenditures 107,798 619,103 250,000 976,900 Source of Funds: 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 40,000 40,000 4002-Measure S 231,900 430,000 250,000 911,900 4438-Reimbursements 25,000 25,000 Total Funding 271,900 455,000 250,000 976,900 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Reimbursements reflects contribution from the Temecula Valley Unified School District. 145 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project reflects the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) improvements to Murrieta Creek within City limits. This project also include the study, design, and construction of alternatives to reconfigure the existing Southside Parking Lot which has been impacted by the Riverside County Flood Control's acquisition of a portion of the parking lot. Lighting will be added to the trail on the east side of Murrieta Creek between First Street and Rancho California Road. The installation of a RCFC Storm Drain Catch Basin No. 100 on Pujol Street was added. Benefit: This project helps prevent flooding of Old Town Temecula. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Design for the Southside parking lot reconfiguration is on- going. Construction is anticipated in FY2024-25. Construction of the trail lighting is anticipated in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW15-07 / 735 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 90,131 96,997 68,500 255,628 5804-Construction 62,748 835,458 602,367 1,500,573 5802-Design & Environmental 224,610 45,790 36,000 306,400 5601-Furnishings & Equipment 129,387 613 130,000 5809-Information Technology 130,000 130,000 Total Expenditures 506,877 978,857 836,867 2,322,601 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 130,000 130,000 4001-General Fund 135,858 135,858 4002-Measure S 53,791 180,000 706,867 940,658 4438-Reimbursements 911,085 5,000 916,085 4145-TEAM 200,000 200,000 Total Funding 1,100,734 385,000 836,867 2,322,601 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 146 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country AMINO L1Ir_,91l:Z4CIA 117A1]1.16IT"1T1IA\ItV City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Infrastructure Project 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Notes : 1. The City Council approved an Agreement for Sale and Purchase with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) for the purchase of a portion of the Southside Parking Lot on July 28, 2020. The Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved the agreement on March 23, 2021. The City received the total purchase price and the Cost to Cure in the amount of $771,136.16 for the reconfiguration of the Southside Parking Lot. 2. Reimbursements include $834,336 from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and $28,249 from Frontier Communications for the purchase of an easement along Pennypickle's Workshop and Murrieta Creek. 3. TEAM - Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset Fund. 147 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country NICOLAS ROAD MULTI -USE TRAIL EXTENSION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental documents and permits, construction, improvements and extension of the Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail from the Seraphina easterly boundary to Joseph Road. The improvements include approximately 1,800 LF of 10' wide Class I Bikeway. Benefit: This project improves pedestrian and biking circulation on the northern side of the City Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: The trail is being constructed by the developer as part of Nicolas Road Extension in 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWNT-25 / 785 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 1,500,000 1,500,000 Total Expenditures 1,500,000 1,500,000 Source of Funds: 4427-Assembly Bill 2766 450,000 450,000 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 300,000 300,000 4170-Measure A 600,000 600,000 4002-Measure S 150,000 150,000 Total Funding 300,000 1,200,000 1,500,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 148 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will include the design and eventual construction of a new parking structure in Old Town and other parking improvements within the Old Town district. The Old Town Parking Management Plan outlines a number of parking strategies that can be implemented in Old Town over time. Additional parking structures are anticipated to be constructed as part of the long term parking management strategy. Benefit: This project will satisfy the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is currently on hold. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-15 / 694 Level: III City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 98,888 6,112 105,000 5802-Design & Environmental 153,535 741,465 895,000 Total Expenditures 252,423 747,577 1,000,000 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund I 1,000,0001 I 1,000,000 Total Funding 1 1,000,000 1,000,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 149 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country OLD TOWN SECURITY CAMERA & SOUND SYSTEM Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project provides for the installation of security cameras, the upgrade of the sound system, and improvements to the fiber optic and Wi-Fi networks throughout Old Town. Benefit: To protect property and life and enhance the ambiance/experience of Old Town. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project will be completed in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Information Technology - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.IT20- 01 / 780 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 4 i� PF"I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5802-Design & Environmental 50,000 50,000 5610-Equipment 1,035,819 174,181 1,210,000 Total Expenditures 1,085,819 174,181 1,260,000 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 4002-Measure S 517,057 568,762 82,943 91,238 600,000 660,000 Total Funding 1,085,819 174,181 1,260,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the ongoing software and equipment maintenance costs associated with the security camera system. 150 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country OLD TOWN TEMECULA PARKLETS PROGRAM Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will provide for modular parklets located throughout Old Town Temecula, including traffic flow enhancements such as bollards or other traffic calming measures. Benefit: A program that continues to enhance the livability of Old Town through small urban parklets. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This is a new project. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.CD24-01 Level City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 300,000 300,000 5802-Design & Environmental 150,000 150,000 Total Expenditures 450,000 450,000 Source of Funds: 4110-Community Reinvestment Program 450,000 450,000 Total Funding - 450,000 450,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 151 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project consists of evaluating the conditions of all public roadways within the City (approximately 382 miles) evaluating and upgrading the City's existing Pavement Management Program software, and providing capital improvement planning for a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget. Benefit: This project will provide the City with a roadmap for maintaining its roadways. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Data collection, compilation, and analysis scheduled to take place January through June of 2024. The final report and upload of pavement information to the City's Lucity database would follow in July/August 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-09 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 75,000 75,000 5802-Design & Environmental 300,000 300,000 Total Expenditures 375,000 375,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4102-RM RA 85,020 289,980 85,020 289,980 Total Funding - 375,000 375,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Road and Repair Accountability Act (RMRA) 152 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country PEDESTRIAN RAMP UPGRADES - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will install American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant ramp upgrades at school crossing sites throughout the City. Benefit: This project improves pedestrian safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Project is estimated to be complete in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-11 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 25,000 25,000 5804-Construction 250,000 250,000 Total Expenditures 275,000 275,000 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 225,000 225,000 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 50,000 50,000 Total Funding - 275,000 275,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Highway Safety Improvement Program - Cycle 11 awarded on March 9, 2023 2. City match is $25,000 based on the HSIP application and grant. Additional appropriated local funds are for administration 153 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will install pedestrian countdown signal heads, ADA compliant pedestrian pushbutton equipment and upgrade traffic signal controllers to improve safety and operations at signalized intersections Citywide including the Butterfield Stage Road, Jefferson Avenue, Margarita Road, Redhawk Parkway, Pechanga Parkway, Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway and Ynez Road corridors. Benefit: This project improves pedestrian safety and traffic circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-10 / 518 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 3,065 16,935 20,000 5804-Construction 773,060 77,306 850,366 5805-Construction Engineering 31,191 41,643 72,834 5802-Design & Environmental 32,563 30,437 63,000 Total Expenditures 839,879 166,321 1,006,200 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 717,753 190,447 908,200 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 128,000 (30,000) 98,000 Total Funding 845,753 160,447 1,006,200 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 154 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RCWD RECYCLED WATER ACCELERATED RETROFIT PROGRAM Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the administration, design and construction of two (2) sites within the City for the conversion of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements. Benefit: This project will reduce use of potable water, increase overall water savings and enhance energy efficiencies and potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: Project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-04 / 206 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 1,239 8,396 9,635 5804-Construction 92,230 77,770 170,000 5805-Construction Engineering 9,100 10,900 20,000 5802-Design & Environmental 25,233 132 25,365 Total Expenditures 127,802 97,198 225,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4438-Reimbursements 104,786 97,198 23,016 201,984 23,016 Total Funding 104,786 120,214 225,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Reimbursement revenue $23,016 for project design from Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The City opted out of participating in RCWD program for construction. As such, an alternate fund source will have to be used. 155 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRAIL EXTENSION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental, and construction of the extension and interconnect of the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail. The extension and interconnect will provide access and under -crossings at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue, and a continuous paved trail along the Santa Gertrudis Creek to interconnect with the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail. Benefit: The project provides additional pedestrian and bicycle trails for the community. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction was completed on September 30, 2022. Only project closeout activities remain. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW08-04 / 739 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 610,178 110 610,288 5804-Construction 4,949,757 74,285 5,024,043 5805-Construction Engineering 866,168 32,057 898,224 5802-Design & Environmental 725,748 41,365 767,112 5806-MSHCP 33,927 33,927 Total Expenditures 7,185,778 147,817 7,333,595 Source of Funds: 4427-Assembly Bill 2766 58,683 58,683 4464-BTA - Bicycle Transportation 223,311 223,311 Account 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 389,073 389,073 4001-General Fund 78,920 78,920 4002-Measure S 2,824,608 2,824,608 4483-Senate Bill 1 829,463 2,929,537 3,759,000 Total Funding 4,404,058 2,929,537 7,333,595 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 156 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PHASE II - MARGARITA UNDER -CROSSING Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental, and construction of the under -crossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along the Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Benefit: The project provides a safe pedestrian and bicycle trail connection for the community. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Project is anticipated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-04 / 732 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 266,979 181,021 448,000 5804-Construction 788 3,922,271 3,923,059 5805-Construction Engineering 370,000 370,000 5802-Design & Environmental 468,974 196,340 665,314 5700-Land Acquisition 1,180 20,320 21,500 5806-MSHCP 1 172,250 172,250 Total Expenditures 737,922 4,862,201 5,600,123 Source of Funds: 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 1,562,908 1,562,908 4002-Measure S 737,922 1,797,293 2,535,215 4483-Senate Bill 1 1,502,000 1,502,000 Total Funding 737,922 4,862,201 5,600,123 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. California Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted the 2019 Active Transportation Program Augmentation on January 30 - 31, 2019. 157 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SIDEWALKS - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalks at various locations throughout the City. A study to identify and prioritize areas with missing sidewalks was completed as part of the Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update in Fiscal Year 2015-16. Based on the study and the available resources, sidewalks will be constructed in the selected areas considering economy of scale and proximity to private development. Benefit: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Funds remaining in this project will be used to add sidewalks to the west side of Ynez Road between Tiera Vista and Rancho Highland. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWSW-02 / 708 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 648,936 648,936 5804-Construction 146,315 286,364 432,679 5805-Construction Engineering 4,412 20,000 24,412 5802-Design & Environmental 283,984 27,782 311,766 Total Expenditures 1,083,646 334,146 1,417,792 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 4002-Measure S 375,000 736,533 306,259 375,000 1,042,792 Total Funding 1,111,533 306,259 1,417,792 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 158 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project involves adding and improving sidewalks in Old Town. The improvement areas include installing eight additional Old Town decorative streetlights on Moreno Road and Mercedes Street (PW22- 17). The City will continue evaluate locations to improve sidewalk in Old Town Temecula. Benefit: Adding sidewalk and other improvements in Old Town promotes a Healthy and Livable City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction of the streetlights was completed in FY23-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWOT-03 / 766 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 358,899 55,000 413,899 5804-Construction 1,133,732 105,783 1,239,516 5805-Construction Engineering 37,179 (1) 37,178 5802-Design & Environmental 130,991 7,000 137,991 Total Expenditures 1,660,801 167,783 1,828,584 Source of Funds: 4140-CDBG 849,426 849,426 4170-Measure A 140,000 140,000 4002-Measure S 960,000 (120,842) 839,158 Total Funding 1,949,426 (120,842) 1,828,584 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 159 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SIDEWALKS - THIRD STREET Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project involves adding sidewalk to Old Town Temecula along Third Street to provide beautiful and safe walking paths for pedestrians. This project is comprised of adding new sidewalks, rolled curb and gutter, asphalt concrete, streetlights, and trees on north side of Third Street from Old Town Front Street to Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street to the public alley. Benefit: This project will improve Transportation Mobility and Connectivity in Old Town. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is on hold. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-03 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program if"°_ - Ol r- 0 am am" Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 190,580 190,580 5804-Construction 624,000 624,000 5805-Construction Engineering 26,000 26,000 5802-Design & Environmental 112,320 112,320 5809-Information Technology 20,000 20,000 Total Expenditures 972,900 972,900 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 4002-Measure S 116,590 856,310 116,590 856,310 Total Funding - 972,900 972,900 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer contribution for this project includes proposed developments fair share of sidewalk improvements. 160 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SIDEWALKS - PAUBA ROAD Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalks along Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Benefit: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This section of Pauba Road was identified in the City's Sidewalk Gap Study. Construction is anticipated to commence in Fiscal Year 2024-2025. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWSW-02-02 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 75,000 75,000 5804-Construction 752,124 752,124 5805-Construction Engineering 60,000 60,000 5802-Design & Environmental 70,000 70,000 Total Expenditures 957,124 957,124 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4437-Senate Bill 821 594,524 362,600 594,524 362,600 Total Funding - 957,124 957,124 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Grant funding source reflects the 2023 Senate Bill 821, Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Program grant. 161 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SIXTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project involves improving the south side of Sixth Street from Old Town Front Street to Mercedes Street. The improvements include adding sidewalks, rolled curb and gutter, paving, streetlights, and trees in accordance with the Old Town Specific Plan. Benefit: Adding sidewalk and other improvements in Old Town promotes a Healthy and Livable City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction is anticipated in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWOT-03- 01/PW22-16 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 51,101 105,000 156,101 5804-Construction 291,061 385,000 676,061 5805-Construction Engineering 38,611 30,000 68,611 5802-Design & Environmental 71,553 71,553 Total Expenditures 452,326 520,000 972,326 Source of Funds: 4110-Community Reinvestment 115,000 115,000 Program 4002-Measure S 452,326 405,000 857,326 Total Funding - 452,326 520,000 972,326 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 162 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SOUTH SIDE SENIOR CENTER FOR ACTIVE ADULTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project was identified in the City's Quality of Life Master Plan 2040 as a future project to better serve the senior community on the south side of Temecula. Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by providing opportunities for seniors to participate in activities and classes. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Conceptual design for this project will begin in Fiscal Year 2025-26. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.NEW 4 Level: III City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5802-Design & Environmental 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 100,000 100,000 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 100,000 100,000 Total Funding 100,000 100,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 163 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country STORM DRAIN PIPE LINING Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will line all City -owned metal storm drain pipe (e.g. corrugated metal pipe (CMP), spiral rib pipe (SRP), etc.), which may be susceptible to corrosion failure. The estimated total length of metal storm drain pipe in the City's inventory is approximately 3.6 miles (19,050 feet). The lining may include spray lining or slip lining to replace the metal with a smoother, more stable surface. Benefit: This project maintains our current stormwater infrastructure. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Identification and design of project(s) will be based on findings of the Citywide Storm Drain Masterplan and investigations from field observations. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWSD-23 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 57,500 57,500 115,000 230,000 5804-Construction 381,000 381,000 762,000 1,524,000 5805-Construction Engineering 37,500 37,500 75,000 150,000 5802-Design & Environmental 37,500 37,500 75,000 150,000 5806-MSHCP 19,050 19,050 38,100 76,200 Total Expenditures 532,550 - 532,550 - 1,065,100 2,130,200 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I I 532,550 532,550 1,065,100 I 2,130,200 Total Funding 532,550 - 532,550 - 1,065,100 2,130,200 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 164 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country TEMECULA CREEK FENCING Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will include the construction of a commercial grade wrought iron fence, or a similar type, along the north side of Temecula Creek between Pechanga Parkway and east of Jedediah Smith Road. Benefit: This project will deter homeless encampments in Temecula Creek and protect the City's mitigation sites. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project was initiated in FY2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-23 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 115,000 115,000 5804-Construction 315,000 315,000 5805-Construction Engineering 30,000 30,000 5802-Design & Environmental 40,000 40,000 Total Expenditures 500,000 500,000 Source of Funds: 4110-Community Reinvestment Program 500,000 500,000 Total Funding - 500,000 500,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 165 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TEMECULA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (TES) POOL RENOVATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the renovation of the Temecula Elementary School (TES) pool building, including roof replacement and the reconstruction of the pool deck. The City of Temecula maintains and operates this pool facility. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Improvements will be made to the pool facility as funds are made available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWTP-16 / 143 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 49,181 37,920 87,100 5802-Design & Environmental 12,3001 35,700 48,000 Total Expenditures 61,481 73,620 135,100 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 135,100 135,100 Total Funding 135,100 135,100 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 166 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL EQUIPMENT UPGRADE PHASE 2 - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will install pedestrian countdown signal heads and upgrade traffic signal controllers to improve safety and operations at signalized intersections Citywide including the Butterfield Stage Road, Margarita Road, Meadows Parkway, Nicolas Road, Pechanga Parkway, Ring Road, and Ynez Road corridors. Benefit: This project improves pedestrian safety and traffic circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-12 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 25,000 25,000 5804-Construction 484,500 484,500 5805-Construction Engineering 63,200 63,200 Total Expenditures 572,700 572,700 Source of Funds: 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 492,930 492,930 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 79,770 79,770 Total Funding - 572,700 572,700 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. Highway Safety Improvement Program - Cycle 11 awarded on March 9, 2023. 2. City match is $54,770 based on the HSIP application and grant. Additional appropriated local funds are for administration 167 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Description: This project will design and construct a fourth traffic signal on the Promenade Mall Ring Road. The new signal will be constructed at the intersection of the Promenade Mall East and the Ring Road. This is the most easterly entrance to the mall on Winchester Road, just west of Margarita Road. The project include full vehicular and pedestrian controlled movements, interconnection to the Winchester Road/ Promenade Mall East intersection and infrastructure to support future closed circuit video. monitoring equipment. z Benefit: This project improves vehicular and pedestrian traffic safety and circulation in the Promenade Mall and surrounding areas. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-15 / 788 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 23,809 24,191 48,000 5804-Construction 237,409 216,291 453,700 5802-Design & Environmental 12,486 1 4,815 17,300 Total Expenditures 273,704 245,296 519,000 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 4002-Measure S 273,704 44,446 200,850 44,446 474,554 Total Funding 273,704 245,296 519,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Per Joint Funding Agreement for Fourth Traffic Signal Promenade Mall Ring Road between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P. dated 08/27/2013. 168 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - SAFETY LIGHTS AND SIGNAL COMMUNICATIONS UPGRADE- CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will upgrade all traffic signals safety lights to LED and install communication system upgrades to 42 signals citywide. Upgraded traffic signal improvements include LED street lights, signal wiring, vehicle heads, controller cabinets, fiber cable, ethernet switches, wireless radios, and related communication equipment to improve safety and operations with optimized traffic signal timing coordination. Signal timing coordination will be improved along the Butterfield Stage Road and Ynez Road corridors. Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's traffic signal safety lights to LED, Sustainable and Resilient City, and upgrade traffic signal communication system equipment to improve mobility and connectivity. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: This project is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-13 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 20,000 20,000 5804-Construction 2,661,397 2,661,397 5805-Construction Engineering 225,000 225,000 5802-Design & Environmental 349,503 349,503 Total Expenditures 369,503 2,886,397 3,255,900 Source of Funds: 4243-DIF-Traffic Signals 134,923 459,667 594,590 4477-HSIP-Highway Safety 234,580 2,206,730 2,441,310 Improvement Program 4002-Measure S 220,000 220,000 Total Funding 369,503 2,886,397 3,255,900 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Highway Safety Improvement Program - Cycle 11 awarded on March 9, 2023. 169 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the development of an Urban Forest Management Plan, conduct a tree inventory and canopy assessment and the planting of 300 trees. This project is in cooperation with Cal Fire Urban & Community Forestry Program, Proposition 68 Grant Agreement. Benefit: The project objectives will produce a baseline management plan for future planning, reduce water requirements, ensure tree life longevity, enhance urban forest in disadvantaged communities, decrease GHG emissions, engage the community through public outreach and education, enhance local air quality, increase canopy coverage, reduce storm water runoff and ultimately lessen tree loss due to disease and insect infestation. This project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City, and a Healthy and Livable City. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: This project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW20-15 / 204 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration (2,430) 3,412 982 5804-Construction 30,574 244 30,818 5802-Design & Environmental 1318,260 26,170 1344,430 Total Expenditures 346,404 29,826 376,230 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 4025-Grants 52,300 323,930 52,300 323,930 Total Funding 52,300 323,930 376,230 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 170 Aft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING - CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the undergrounding of utilities at various locations throughout the City to extend the undergrounding done by the developers beyond the limits of their developments. The project will continuously look for additional locations to underground power poles with the goal of beautifying Temecula. The funding for this project covers the west side of Old Town Front Street between Fourth Street and Fifth Street (including about 25 feet of missing improvements). Benefit: Undergrounding overhead lines will help make the City a Sustainable and Resilient City in the event of natural disasters and wild fires. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: Undergrounding the power pole on the west side of Old Town Front Street between Fourth and Fifth Street is scheduled for completion in 2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWUG-04 / 776 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 917 30,958 31,875 5804-Construction 97,953 111,063 209,017 5802-Design & Environmental 3,483 3,483 Total Expenditures 102,353 142,021 244,375 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I 244,3751 I 244,375 Total Funding 1 244,375 244,375 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 171 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country VACANT PARCEL CLEAN-UP AND BEAUTIFICATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: A project to clean-up vacant parcels and beautify other parcels throughout the City. Benefit: To work towards the Quality of Life Master Plan aspiration to be a City that continues to maintain pristine landscaping at parks, along roadways and at public facilities. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: This project is in the initial planning phase. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5 800. C D 24-02 Level City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 360,000 360,000 Total Expenditures 360,000 360,000 Source of Funds: 4110-Community Reinvestment Program 360,000 360,000 Total Funding - 360,000 360,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 172 I fr. City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Parks and Recreation Projects N1cO`ps aD © �O N tE ?OP O A o �y Y a ?P A O E bP° itt` p14D DR <O P.. S 9O1,ANA Wy C *to F� t p o mgR MA aOP Oi 4-0 �L ©OGp1 Ifo 1ARO 0 ?O� O �s P4+ (FP 00 V1sr1k 4 dl Oa `'YF2 aP ` aA 78 RO © � 1 CPV 3 v C 'Ca GO D O 9 PN O @ O V a O 2 y� �n ra O % OaJOLA�O AsT OEQ SEMEGU�p PKWy JP`b RA& A� cy q c9 A �'4 RO p.HK PO F v O �y 0 O v v �O 9 A 0 Map ID Description 1 Children's Museum Enhancement Project 2 Community Recreation Center Splash Pad & Shade Structures 3 Dog Park Renovation 4 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction & Repair 5 Harveston Community Park Building Renovation & Expansion 6 Pickleball Courts Map ID Description 7 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal 8 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Hockey Rink 9 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pump Track Shade Structure 10 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion & Renovation 11 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park 12 Uptown Temecula Sports Park 174 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: As exhibits and play experiences in the Children's Museum become outdated, this project allows for the re -design and replacement of exhibit areas or refurbishment of existing exhibits. This process provides the museum visitors new and updated play experiences. Benefit: This project enhances existing exhibit areas of the Children's Museum. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A project list has been developed. Projects are completed on an on -going basis as funding becomes available. Department: TCSD - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW19-05 / 125 Level: II City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 432 9,568 10,000 5804-Construction 312,825 208,265 521,090 5802-Design & Environmental 14,000 14,000 Total Expenditures 313,257 231,833 545,090 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 4002-Measure S 145,090 400,000 145,090 400,000 Total Funding 545,090 545,090 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 175 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER SPLASH PAD & SHADE STRUCTURES Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the conversion of the CRC's kiddie pool into a splash pad, and the addition of shade structures throughout the pool area. Benefit: This project will provide City residents an additional splash pad for enhanced recreational opportunities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project design will commence in Fiscal Year 2022-23, construction in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-07 / 205 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 65,987 103,562 169,549 5804-Construction 2,024,598 2,024,598 5805-Construction Engineering 20,000 20,000 5802-Design & Environmental 211,446 76,554 288,000 Total Expenditures 277,433 2,224,715 2,502,147 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 277,433 2,224,714 2,502,147 Total Funding 1 277,433 2,224,714 2,502,147 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 176 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country DOG PARK RENOVATION Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project is to design and construct a dog park at Mike Naggar Community Park. The dog park will include small and large dog pens, seating, drinking fountains, shade, concrete hardscape, and landscaping in addition to ADA access. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Responsive City Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Design is complete. Contract anticipated to be awarded in March 2024. Construction is anticipated to be complete by end of summer 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-14 / 207 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 88,684 126,500 215,184 5804-Construction 714,800 714,800 5805-Construction Engineering 20,000 20,000 5802-Design & Environmental 69,210 20,806 15,000 105,016 5809-Information Technology 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 1 157,8941 882,106 115,000 1,155,000 Source of Funds: 4245-DIF-Corporate Facilities 100,000 100,000 4025-Grants 447,126 447,126 4002-Measure S 157,894 434,980 15,000 607,874 Total Funding 157,894 882,106 115,000 1,155,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Proposition 68 Grant from the California Department of Parks and Recreation ($247,126). 2. American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), signed into law March 11, 2021, grant through the County of Riverside ($200,000) 177 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country EMPIRE CREEK IMPROVEMENTS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. A report for Friendship Park (formerly Pala Park), Mike Naggar Community Park (formerly Margarita Community Park), and Long Canyon Creek Park was developed. This study will serve as a basis for project design, environmental clearance, and construction at each location. Benefit: This project prevents further erosion into park site. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Start preliminary design in FY24-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.NEW (PW23-20) Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 48,940 170,000 218,940 5804-Construction 51,424 3,822,532 3,873,956 5805-Construction Engineering 23,584 160,000 183,584 5802-Design & Environmental 400,000 400,000 800,000 5806-MSHCP 191,127 191,127 Total Expenditures 523,948 400,000 - 4,343,659 5,267,607 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4452-Unspecified 523,949 400,000 4,343,658 923,949 4,343,658 Total Funding - 523,949 400,000 - 4,343,658 5,267,607 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 178 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program HARVESTON COMMUNITY PARK BUILDING RENOVATIONS AND EXPANSION Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of the renovation, expansion, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing building at the Harveston Community Park. The work includes the expansion of the classrooms, a dedicated check -in counter, a storage room, and bringing the facility up to current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Benefit: This project provides additional amenities for City residents, maintenance of existing building, and brings facility to accessibility compliance. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project development, design and environmental in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Construction in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-11 / 225 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 55,445 244,555 300,000 5804-Construction 1,450,000 262,677 1,712,677 5805-Construction Engineering 30,000 85,000 115,000 5802-Design & Environmental 8,300 211,700 220,000 5809-Information Technology 750,000 750,000 Total Expenditures 63,745 2,686,255 347,677 3,097,677 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 4240-DIF-Quimby 2,000,000 750,000 347,677 2,000,000 1,097,677 Total Funding - 2,750,000 347,677 3,097,677 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer contributions reflect extraordinary benefit payments from the Heirloom Farms and Prado developments, as well as an anticipated payment from a residential project on Date Street. 179 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country INFILL RECREATIONAL AMENITIES Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: Design and implement alternative recreational amenities such as skateboard park features, mountain/BMX bike skill trainers, rock climbing, parkour, slacklining, exercise equipment, and others within opportunistic locations such as City -owned remnants or spaces within existing parks or public facilities. Benefit: This project will provide City residents with additional popular amenities for enhanced recreational opportunities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is in design. Construction is anticipated in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-05 / 226 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 4,126 95,874 100,000 5804-Construction 250,000 250,000 5802-Design & Environmental 50,000 50,000 Total Expenditures 4,126 395,874 400,000 Source of Funds: 4240-D I F-Quimby I 4,1261 395,874 I 400,000 Total Funding 1 4,1261 395,874 400,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 180 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOMS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of a new restroom facility at Long Canyon Creek Park that meet current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Benefit: This project provides restrooms for park patrons that are accessibility compliant. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is new (split from PW17-06) Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWPE-07-03/ PW23-18 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 50,000 127,000 177,000 5804-Construction 800,000 20,000 820,000 5805-Construction Engineering 60,000 60,000 5802-Design & Environmental 95,000 125,930 220,930 5809-Information Technology 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 945,000 362,930 1,307,930 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I I 945,000 362,930 I 1,307,930 Total Funding 945,000 362,930 1,307,930 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the increased janitorial costs associated with the addition of new park restroom facilities. 181 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PARK RESTROOMS RENOVATIONS, EXPANSION AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) IMPROVEMENTS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of the renovation, expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing restroom facilities. The restroom expansion includes renovating concession and restroom facilities at the North/South Baseball fields at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park to meet current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Benefit: This project provides additional restrooms for park patrons and brings facility to accessibility compliance. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is ongoing Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWPE-07 / 155 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 121,598 100,402 222,000 5804-Construction 105,251 727,548 832,800 5805-Construction Engineering 250,000 250,000 5802-Design & Environmental 15,031 29,969 45,000 5809-Information Technology 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 241,880 1,137,919 1,379,800 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 347,800 1,032,000 1,379,800 Total Funding 347,800 1,032,000 1,379,800 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 27,602 28,154 28,717 29,292 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the increased janitorial costs associated with the addition of new park restroom facilities. 182 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation and improvement projects at various City parks. The rehabilitation and improvement projects could include, but are not limited to, parking lot repairs and resurfacing, landscape medians, raised and cracked concrete sidewalk replacement, fencing repair and replacement, landscaping and irrigation system efficiency upgrades, lighting system repairs and efficiency upgrades, on -site drainage improvements and other similar projects. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitations are completed on an on -going basis. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWP1-14 / 130 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 21,400 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 171,400 5804-Construction 2,835,933 839,841 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 5,300,774 5802-Design & Environmental 6,200 1 6,200 Total Expenditures 2,863,532 864,841 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 5,478,374 Source of Funds: 4240-D I F-Quimby 250,000 250,000 4001-General Fund 1,003,059 1,003,059 4002-Measure S 1,369,000 721,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3,840,000 4438-Reimbursements 103,315 282,000 385,315 Total Funding 2,725,374 1,003,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 5,478,374 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 183 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country PICKLEBALL COURTS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: Design and construct new dedicated pickleball courts at Ronald Reagan Sports Park. Benefit: This project will provide City residents with an additional popular amenity for enhanced recreational opportunities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project development, design, and environmental through Fiscal Year 2023-24. Construction in Fiscal Year 2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-03 / 787 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 118,013 248,418 366,431 5804-Construction 2,402,460 2,402,460 5805-Construction Engineering 50,000 50,000 5802-Design & Environmental 138,705 143,282 281,987 5809-Information Technology 200,000 175,000 375,000 Total Expenditures 1 256,7181 3,044,160 175,000 3,475,878 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 4002-Measure S 256,718 1,193,282 1,850,878 175,000 1,450,000 2,025,878 Total Funding 256,718 3,044,160 175,000 3,475,878 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 184 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAFETY SURFACING IMPROVEMENTS Parks and Recreation Project Total Project Playground Location Cost $ 1,040,000 Prior Year Actual Expenditures - Various Park Sites $ 440,000 $ 2,500,000 Total $ 3,980,000 Long Canyon Creek Park, Temecula Creek Park, Redhawk Park & Calle Aragon Park $ 2,177,649 Total $ 2,177,649 Ronald Reagan Sports Park $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Year Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total $ - Paseo Gallante Park & Loma Linda Park $ 500 000 2026-27 Total $ 500,000 2027-28 Total $ - Future Playgrounds Enhancements $ 500,000 2028-29 Total $ 500,000 7,657,649 Prior Year Actual Expenditures $ 3,980,000 Fiscal Year 2023-24 $ 2,177,649 Fiscal Year 2024-25 $ 500,000 Fiscal Year 2025-26 $ - Fiscal Year 2026-27 $ 500,000 Fiscal Year 2027-28 $ - Fiscal Year 2028-29 $ 500,000 TOTAL: $ 7,657,649 DIF-Park & Rec Improvements DIF-Quimby Measure S Measure S Measure S DIF-Quimby DIF-Quimby 185 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT & SAFETY SURFACING Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project includes the re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing at existing City parks to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. The projects include playground safety assessments, planning and evaluation, playground quality enhancements such as fencing, surfacing, accessibility and or new equipment. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: The enhancement of playground equipment and safety surfacing will be performed at one to two sites per year, dependent on available funding. A priority list has been developed and enhancement will be completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWPG-13 / 120 Level: II 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 1,965 72,200 20,000 20,000 20,000 134,165 5804-Construction 3,909,009 2,166,675 480,000 480,000 480,000 7,515,684 5802-Design & Environmental 7,704 96 7,800 Total Expenditures 3,918,678 2,238,971 500,000 - 500,000 500,000 7,657,649 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 11040,000 11040,000 4240-DIF-Quimby 440,000 500,000 500,000 1,440,000 4002-Measure S 2,500,000 2,177,649 500,000 5,177,649 Total Funding 3,980,000 2,177,649 500,000 - 500,000 - 500,000 7,657,649 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 186 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK HOCKEY RINK Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project will include the renovation of the existing hockey rink to install new flooring material and arena style roof structure. Benefit: This project will upgrade the existing aging facility and provide state- of-the-art recreation opportunity for the City's residents. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Construction anticipated to begin Q1 of 2025. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-06 / 223 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 75,223 255,000 330,223 5804-Construction 1,548,594 1,465,406 3,014,000 5805-Construction Engineering 30,000 70,000 100,000 5802-Design & Environmental 50,712 25,471 76,183 5809-Information Technology 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 1 125,9351 1,959,065 1,535,406 3,620,406 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 1,014,974 1,014,974 4240-DIF-Quimby 520,432 520,432 4002-Measure S 125,935 1,959,065 2,085,000 Total Funding 125,935 1,959,065 1,535,406 3,620,406 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 187 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK PUMP TRACK SHADE STRUCTURE Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project will provide for the installation of shade structures adjacent to the Ronald Reagan Sport Park Pump Track and launch pad area. Benefit: The shade structure will provide shade for users waiting to enter the pump track area. This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-14 / 224 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 29,484 (1,484) 28,000 5804-Construction 10,067 76,933 87,000 5805-Construction Engineering 1,5001 3,500 15,000 Total Expenditures 41,051 78,949 120,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I 41,0511 78,949 I 120,000 Total Funding 1 41,051 78,949 120,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 188 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK RESTROOM EXPANSION & RENOVATION Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of the restroom building expansion at Ronald Reagan Sports Park. The restroom expansion includes adding additional restroom stalls and urinals, renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case. Benefit: This project provides additional facilities for park patrons. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW18-03 / 114 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 336,644 4,291 340,935 5804-Construction 891,532 107,203 998,735 5805-Construction Engineering 28,172 33,147 61,319 5802-Design & Environmental 69,936 5,564 75,500 Total Expenditures 1,326,285 150,204 1,476,489 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4438-Reimbursements 1,326,285 4,290 145,914 1,472,199 4,290 Total Funding 1,330,575 145,914 1,476,489 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 189 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK SKATE PARK Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project will remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art street skate plaza elements. Benefit: This project will upgrade the existing aging facility and provide state- of-the-art recreation opportunity for the City's residents. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Design was initiated in FY2022-23. Construction is anticipated in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-07 / 222 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 2026-27 Projected Projected 2027-28 2028-29 Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 32,656 175,000 207,656 5804-Construction 1,211,091 2,105,000 3,316,091 5805-Construction Engineering 70,000 70,000 5802-Design & Environmental 27,224 439,029 466,253 5809-Information Technology 100,000 100,000 Total Expenditures 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 100,000 4,160,000 Source of Funds: 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 4002-Measure S 59,880 100,000 1,825,120 2,175,000 100,000 4,060,000 Total Funding 59,880 1,825,120 2,175,000 100,000 4,160,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 190 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country SPORTS COURT RESURFACING Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project includes repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. Surfacing includes tennis courts, basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Projects will be completed on an on -going basis. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWSR-15 / 141 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 255,990 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 770,257 Total Expenditures 255,9901 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 770,257 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I 255,9901 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,0001 770,257 Total Funding 1 255,9901 64,267 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,0001 770,257 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 191 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING - LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CONVERSION Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the replacement of the aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks. Benefit: This project enhances the safety of sport field users, reduces unnecessary light pollution and increases energy efficiency at City parks. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project will be completed on an on -going basis as funding becomes available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWSL-12 / 113 Level: I 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5804-Construction 1,065,417 1,164, 583 500,000 500,000 3,230,000 Total Expenditures 1,065,417 1,164,583 - 500,000 - 500,000 3,230,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 4145-TEAM 1,065,417 864,583 500,000 500,000 300,000 2,930,000 300,000 Total Funding 1,065,417 1,164,583 - 500,000 - 500,000 - 3,230,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. TEAM - Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset Management Fund 2. 25 year warranty on service & parts 192 Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country TEMECULA DUCK POND SPILLWAY PROJECT Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, and construction of the pond overflow spillway. Benefit: This project will provide a way to pass floodwater safely through the pond and to the channel downstream. This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: New Project Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.New Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 10,000 10,000 5804-Construction 165,000 165,000 5805-Construction Engineering 125,000 25,000 Total Expenditures 200,000 200,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S I I 200,000 I 200,000 Total Funding 200,000 200,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 193 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country UPTOWN TEMECULA SPORTS PARK Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project will provide for the design and construction of a regional sports park facility in the Riverside County Flood Control District detention basin near Jefferson Avenue and Sanborn Avenue. It will include soccer fields, walking paths, and parking. Benefit: This project will provide a much needed recreational facility for the residents of the City and the region. This project aligns with the City's core value of a healthy and livable City, as well as investment in parks and open space facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Continue coordination with Riverside Flood Control & Water Conservation District and Eastern Municipal Water District to develop this project in conjunction with their proposed uses in this space. Project development, design and environmental through Fiscal Year 2024-25. Construction can start in Fiscal Year 2026-27 if funding can be secured and successfully coordinated with the other agencies. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-12 / 221 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed 2025-26 Budget Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 66,618 233,382 80,000 200,000 580,000 5804-Construction 1,220,000 10,725,545 11,945,545 5805-Construction Engineering 225,000 225,000 5802-Design & Environmental 55,333 744,667 800,000 5809-Information Technology 800,000 800,000 5806-MSHCP 597,277 597,277 Total Expenditures 121,951 2,198,049 80,000 - 12,547,822 14,947,822 Source of Funds: 4240-D I F-Quimby 121,951 878,049 1,000,000 4002-Measure S 1,320,000 80,000 1,400,000 4452-Unspecified 12,547,822 12,547,822 Total Funding 121,951 2,198,049 80,000 - 12,547,822 14,947,822 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 194 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country VAIL RANCH PARK RESTROOMS Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project provides for the design and construction of the renovation, expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements of existing restroom facilities. The restroom expansion includes the addition of a new restroom facilities at Vail Ranch Park that meet current ADA accessibility compliance standards. Benefit: This project provides restrooms for park patrons that are accessibility compliant. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Project is new (split from PW17-06) Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWPE-07-02/ PW23-06 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 50,000 127,000 177,000 5804-Construction 800,000 35,000 835,000 5805-Construction Engineering 60,000 60,000 5802-Design & Environmental 95,000 125,930 220,930 5809-Information Technology 30,000 30,000 Total Expenditures 945,000 377,930 1,322,930 Source of Funds: 4002-Measure S 945,000 377,930 1,322,930 Total Funding 945,000 377,930 1,322,930 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 29,878 30,475 31,085 31,706 Notes : 1. Operating & Maintenance costs reflect the increased janitorial costs associated with the addition of new park restroom facilities. 195 CFD FUNDED PROJECTS 197 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program The Heart of Southern California CFD Bond Projects Wine Country NIGOLpS llD �O 0 p1E 0g� t�0 O CA C, J IIV RO �O NO DR Q�V SOUANA IVY to 9 Ito N O MAROP 9 � � F 1 ?O 9L D v GpVIFGRNIARO 00 a o PA+ lb �P� O TA�� 4 V IS � lS O _ H 0�9 A, 2,P0 6 7C R P K RV PUBA �9 4 g 4 AAG0 pN sp. y O O� OA O 2 A y�r Z O A ST ORTol.ARO V ev vIy JP`� RANcy.e TRMEOVI.APK AF �y 9� RO 9 pyK Pe v O Map ID Description 1 Butterfield Stage Road Extension 2 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 3 Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation 198 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Project Project Description: This project includes the complete design and construction of four lanes on Butterfield Stage Road (from Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road), four lanes on Murrieta Hot Springs Road (from Butterfield Stage Road to the City limits), and two lanes on Calle Chapos (from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Road), totaling approximately 3.2 miles of road. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by providing a crucial north and south arterial road on the eastern side of the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Construction of the roads has been completed. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW15-11 / 723 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 2,767,560 288 2,767,848 5804-Construction 20,050,733 1,520,415 21,571,148 5805-Construction Engineering 1,231,619 1,231,619 5802-Design & Environmental 820,789 820,789 5700-Land Acquisition 15,015,423 15,015,423 5240-Utilities 203 203 Total Expenditures 1 39, 86,3271 1,520,702 41,407,029 Source of Funds: 4277-CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 38,401,739 635,200 39,036,939 4438-Reimbursements 932,090 932,090 4413-TU M F 1,438,000 11438,000 Total Funding 40,771,829 635,200 41,407,029 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 199 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program NICOLAS ROAD EXTENSION & IMPROVEMENTS Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Project Project Description: This project includes the extension of Nicolas Road from the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II westerly boundary to Calle Girasol/Liefer Road. The improvements include approximately 4,000 LF road improvements and culvert crossing at Santa Gertrudis Creek. Also included is reimbursement for improvements at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road, competed in 2021. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation on the eastern side of the City. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Woodside, the developer of Sommer's Bend development is taking the lead in completing the improvements. Construction started in FY2023-24 and is scheduled for completion in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW20-14 / 604 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 9,109 595,144 604,253 5804-Construction 16,292,907 16,292,907 5805-Construction Engineering 2,137,500 2,137,500 5802-Design & Environmental 2,675 994,825 997,500 5700-Land Acquisition 1,440,000 1,440,000 5806-MSHCP 712,500 712,500 Total Expenditures 11,784 22,172,876 22,184,660 Source of Funds: 4277-CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 11,784 7,695,933 7,707,717 4278-CFD 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch- 6,722,850 6,722,850 Phase II) 4666-Developer Contribution 7,754,093 7,754,093 Total Funding 1 11,7841 22,172,876 22,184,660 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 200 f Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program PECHANGA PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Projects Funded by Community Facilities District Bonds Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, and implementation of an environmental mitigation site required for the Pechanga Parkway Project, including acquisition and planting of the mitigation site in Temecula Creek. In addition, this project provides water to plant material and monitoring the mitigation site for five (5) years. Benefit: This project increases environmental mitigation areas. Core Value: A Sustainable and Resilient City Project Status: The design and construction of new wetlands was completed during Fiscal Year 2014-15. Approval of the maturity of the mitigation site by the resource agencies was obtained during Fiscal Year 2020-21. The maintenance of the created mitigation area is complete. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW11-01 / 516 Level: I Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2024-25 2023-24 Proposed 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 327,771 327,771 5804-Construction 184,730 184,730 5805-Construction Engineering 1,710 1,710 5802-Design & Environmental 329,367 329,367 5700-Land Acquisition 20,442 20,442 5240-Utilities 1,0231 1,023 Total Expenditures 865,044 865,044 Source of Funds: 4275-CFD 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 1 837,2361 27,808 865,044 Total Funding 1 837,236 27,808 865,044 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 201 ]] Thu .w c{ S-1— Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program FUTURE YEARS PROJECTS The following projects have been identified through the City's Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) update and reflects the citizens' 20-Year Priorities Timeline. Additional capital projects identified by City staff are also reflected. Cost estimates will be reflected when the projects are included in the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program Budget. Project Title CIRCULATION La Paz Street Widening from Ynez Road to Temecula Parkway Margarita Road Street Improvements Pauba Road Improvements - east of Margarita Road on the north side Rainbow Canyon Road Widening from Pechanga Parkway to City Limit Temecula Creek Bridge at Avenida de Missiones Rancho Way Bridge at 1-15 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Cherry Street (connecting at French Valley Parkway)* Western Bypass Corridor* INFRASTRUCTURE/OTW�p` Acquistion of Fire Station 12 in Old Town* Complete Temecula Loop Trail* Climate Action Plan* History Museum Renovation Integrated Watershed Management Plan* 1-15 Gateway Monument* Old Town Parking Structure(s)* Fire Training Facility with Tower* Wildlife Crossing over 1-15* (PARKS and RECREATION Vail Ranch Park Site D Mobile Library Resource Vans* Organic Community Garden* Tennis Complex* Performing Arts Center* Aquatics Facility with Olympic -size Swimming Pool* * Items identified in the Quality of Life Master Plan - 2040 Department Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public Works Public/Private Development City Manager's Office Community Development Community Development Community Development Community Development Public Works Public Works Public/Private Development Public/Private Development Community Services Public/Private Development Public/Private Development Public/Private Development Public/Private Development Public/Private Development 203 R The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Redding Eureka Lake Tahoe SACRAMENTO � NaP,14, s,6 Oakland Sari Francisco, LOCATOR MAP NEVADA ;San lose Monterey F@S CALIFORNIA R IA Sri Luis Obispo Bakersfeld PAC Santa&I LosFFd Ange es OCEAN Pa M Ir,gS n DiegoCC City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program 1 � 215 Palm Springs \ 3� Fh�. Hear[ of So The The City of Temecula is a General Law City located in southwestern California, United States, with a population of 108,899. The City was incorporated on December 1, 1989. Temecula, known as the Heart of Southern California Wine Country, is conveniently located off the 1-15 freeway, approximately one hour north of San Diego. Temecula's central location attracts visitors from popular Southern California locales like Palm Springs, Los Angeles, Anaheim, Irvine, Carlsbad and San Diego. 205 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 R The H-t of Soothers C,Il(orNa Capital Improvement Program Wine Country COMPLETED CIP PROJECTS 770 PW16-04 CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS $312,631 2017-18 757 PW13-07 FIRE STATION 73 LIVING QUARTERS UPGRADE $1,816,068 2017-18 119 PW15-08 PATRICIA BIRDSALL SYNTHETIC TURF REPLACEMENT $1,844,679 2017-18 999 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS $8,500 2017-18 715 PW12-19 CITYWIDE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT $777,069 2018-19 763 DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS $1,591,872 2018-19 765 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (EOC) IMPROVEMENTS $117,488 2018-19 115 PW17-07 FALLEN HEROES MEMORIAL $275,623 2018-19 695 OLD TOWN STREET LIGHT CONVERSION LED $33,754 2018-19 773 PW17-09 RONALD H ROBERTS TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY $248,074 2018-19 122 PW17-23 TEEN VILLAGE $37,409 2018-19 660 PW06-04 WESTERN BYPASS BRIDGE AT MURRIETA CREEK $964,462 2018-19 713 PW16-03 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT $347,157 2019-20 753 FIRE STATION RORIPAUGH PHASE II $69,030 2019-20 691 PW17-20 MAIN STREET PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS $135,355 2019-20 555 PW17-05 SIDEWALK SIXTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS $327,631 2019-20 775 PW17-22 SIDEWALKS - YNEZ ROAD $107,874 2019-20 523 PW18-08 TRAFFIC CAMERAS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT $814,864 2019-20 116 PW18-02 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER (CRC) POOL SITE ENHANCEMENT $1,942,214 2020-21 117 COMMUNITY SERVICES MASTER PLAN $276,200 2020-21 136 HARVESTON LAKE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS $78,009 2020-21 146 PW17-09 RONALD H. ROBERTS TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY ENHANCEMENT $164,217 2020-21 132 PW12-20 SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK PLAYGROUND $484,317 2020-21 650 PW10-13 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - WINCHESTER RD $1,409,205 2021-22 989 TENANT IMPROVEMENTS - VTV $237,837 2021-22 781 PW20-09 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - MINI PUMP TRACK $87,706 2022-23 718 PW18-04 BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - PUMP TRACK $545,839 2022-23 526 PW19-21 CITYWIDE BUFFERED BIKE LANE STRIPING $96,473 2022-23 145 PW20-07 EAGLE SOAR SPLASH PAD CONTROL SYSTEM RENOVATION $192,260 2022-23 522 PW17-08 EMERGENCY VEHICLE PRE-EMPTION UPGRADE PROGRAM - CITYWIDE $246,674 2022-23 719 PW07-04 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 1 $28,575,323 2022-23 603 PW20-01 OVERHEAD STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM - CITYWIDE $322,416 2022-23 530 PW15-14 PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING $4,740,868 2022-23 689 PW17-29 RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT $667,620 2022-23 613 PW18-06 ROUNDABOUT IMPROVEMENTS ON YNEZ ROAD $777,332 2022-23 220 PW20-12 SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK PERIMETER FENCING $251,311 2022-23 696 PW17-16 SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN BOARDWALK ENHANCEMENT $1,124,860 2022-23 747 PW06-09 TEMECULA PARK & RIDE $4,359,423 2022-23 153 PW13-09 LIBRARY PARKING - PHASE 11 $3,261,430 2023-24 114 PW18-03 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK RESTROOM EXPANSION $1,476,489 2023-24 187 PW05-13 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK CHANNEL SILT REMOVAL $672,219 2023-24 721 PW19-18 SIDEWALKS- DLR DRIVE $464,866 2023-24 127 PWFC-10 FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION & REPAIR $2,067,402 2023-24 $64,352,049 206 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program ABATEMENT - Abatement usually applies to tax levies, special assessments, and service charges. ACCOUNTING SYSTEM - The methods and records established to identify, assemble, analyze, classify, record, and report a government's transactions and to maintain accountability for the related assets and liabilities. ACCRUAL BASIS -The recording of the financial effects on a government of transactions and other events and circumstances that have cash consequences for the government in the periods in which those transactions, events, and circumstances occur, rather than only in the periods in which cash is received or paid by the government. ACTUAL - Represents the actual costs from the results of operations. ADOPTED - Represents the budget as approved by the City Council. ADOPTION - Formal action by the City Council that sets the spending limits for the fiscal year. AGENCY FUND - A fund normally used to account for assets held by a government as an agent for individuals, private organizations or other governments and/or other funds. APPROPRIATION - A legal authorization granted by the City Council to make expenditures and incur obligations for specific purposes. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990 (ADA) - A federal law providing for a wide range of protection to individuals which directly benefit District members. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - A separate local government agency formed to provide specific local public improvements that directly benefit District members. AUDIT - A systematic collection of the sufficient, competent evidential matter needed to attest to fairness of management's assertions in the financial statements or to evaluate whether management has efficiently and effectively carried out its responsibilities. BALANCE SHEET - The financial statement disclosing the assets, liabilities, and equity of an entity at a specified date. BALANCED BUDGET - A budget that reflects operating revenues that fully cover operating expenditures. BUDGET - A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a given period and the proposed means of financing them. Used without any modifier, the term usually indicates a financial plan for a single fiscal year. BUDGETARY CONTROL - The control or management of a government or enterprise in accordance with an approved budget for the purpose of keeping expenditures within the limitations of available appropriations and revenues. 207 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - Expenditures resulting in the acquisition of or addition to the government's general fixed assets having a unit cost of $5,000 or more and a useful life of greater than one year. Infrastructure assets of $100,000 or more are also recorded capital expenditures. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - Construction or major repair of City buildings, infrastructure, and facilities such as streets, roads, highways, bridges, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm drains, traffic signals, streetlights, gas and water distribution facilities, and parks. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) - A comprehensive plan which projects the capital needs of the community. Generally, it is a cyclical process that projects the needs for a set number of years. Capital improvements plans are essential to sound infrastructure and financial planning. The annual capital budget is derived from the long-term CIP. CAPITAL OUTLAY - Expenditures which qualify as capital costs according to accounting standards. This includes furniture, fixtures, machinery, equipment, and other relatively minor fixed assets. CAPITAL PROJECT - A specific undertaking involving the procurement, construction or installation of facilities and related equipment which improves, preserves, enhances, or modernizes the City's provision of municipal services, has a long-term useful life, and for which costs exceed $30,000. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) - Funds allocated to local government from the federal government, based on a formula, but required to be applied for and used within a broad functional area such as community development. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING - Engineering work during the construction process that ensures projects are constructed in accordance with design parameters and specifications. The primary construction engineering functions are construction inspections, laboratory services, field surveys and design plan updates or interpretations. CONTINGENCY - A budgetary reserve set aside for emergency or unanticipated expenditures. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - Contracts for professional services. CORE VALUE - The Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) provides the framework for the City's Strategic Budgeting activities. The City Council has set priorities and guided staff in developing seven (7) Core Values upon which to focus time and resources (as identified in the QLMP). These areas include: 1. A Safe & Prepared Community 2. Transportation Mobility & Connectivity 3. Healthy & Livable City 4. Economic Prosperity 5. Sustainable & Resilient City 6. Accountable & Responsive City Government 7. Equity 208 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program COVID-19 - The viral outbreak, caused by a coronavirus that causes upper -respiratory illness, became a pandemic in the first quarter of 2020. The economic impact it will have on local government is difficult to predict due to the sudden and unprecedented nature of the pandemic. The full effect may not be known for some time but local governments are likely to see significant reductions in tax revenues. CURRENT BUDGET - Represents the original adopted budget plus any approved changes and anticipated year-end adjustments. DEBT SERVICE FUND - A fund established to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long-term debt principal and interest. Sometimes referred to as a Sinking Fund. DEPARTMENT - An organizational unit comprised of programs and program managers. A single director manages each department. DESIGNATED FUND BALANCE - Management's intended use of available expendable financial resources in governmental funds reflecting actual plans approved by the City Council. ENCUMBRANCE - Obligations in the form of purchase orders, contracts, or other commitments. They cease to be encumbrances when paid, cancelled, or when the actual liability is set up. EXPENDITURES - Decreases in net financial resources that include current operating expenses that require the current or future use of net current assets, debt services, and capital outlays. FEES - Charges for specific services. FINES AND FORFEITURES - A fine is a financial penalty imposed by a government agency as restitution for wrongdoing. The wrongdoing is typically defined by a codification of legislation, regulations, and decrees. Forfeiture is the automatic loss of property, including cash, as a penalty for breaking the law, or as compensation for losses resulting from illegal activities. Once property has been forfeited, the City may claim it, resulting in confiscation of the property. FISCAL YEAR -The period designated by the City signifying the beginning and ending period for recording financial transactions. The City of Temecula has a fiscal year of July 1 through June 30. FRANCHISE - A special privilege granted by a government, permitting the continued use of public property, such as refuse disposal and cable television, and usually involving the elements of monopoly and regulation. FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE) - The amount of time a position has been budgeted for in terms of the amount of time a regular, full-time employee normally works in a year. Most full-time employees are paid for 2,080 hours in a year. FUND - A fiscal and accounting entity with a self -balancing set of accounts recording cash and other financial resources together with all related liabilities and residual equities or balances and changes therein which are segregated for the purpose of carrying on specific activities or attaining certain objectives in accordance with special regulations, restrictions, or limitations. 209 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program FUND BALANCE - The difference between assets and liabilities that is generally spendable or available for appropriation. Some Governmental funds as well as Proprietary and Fiduciary funds which utilize full accrual basis of accounting also include non -spendable fund balance which includes amounts that cannot be spent because they include prepaid items or inventories or are legally required to be maintained intact, such as the principal portion of an endowment. FUTURE YEARS - The intent of the future period is to project out to ten (10) years, projects that are anticipated by staff and the City Council that will ultimately have a very large impact on the City and surrounding area. GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT - This term refers to Article X11113 of the California State Constitution that places limits on the amount of proceeds from taxes that state and local governmental agencies can receive and spend each year. GENERAL FUND - Accounts for tax and other general fund revenues (e.g., sales taxes, property taxes, fines and forfeitures, investment interest, etc.) and records the transactions of general governmental services (e.g., police, fire, library, parks and recreation, public service, etc.). GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS (GAAP) - GAAP is the uniform minimum standards of and guidelines to financial accounting and reporting. They govern the form and content of the basic financial statements of an entity. GAAP encompass the conventions, rules, and procedures necessary to define the accepted accounting practices at a particular time. They include both broad guidelines of general application and detailed practices and procedures. GAAP provides a standard by which to measure financial presentations. GOALS - The desired result of accomplishments within a given time frame, usually a fiscal year. GRANTS - Contributions or gifts of cash or other assets from another government to be used or expended for a specified purpose. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES - Funds received from federal, state, and other local government sources in the form of grants, shared revenues, and payments in lieu of taxes. INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS - A fund used to account for financing of goods or services provided by one department to other departments on a cost -reimbursement basis. LEVY - To impose taxes for the support of government activities. LICENSES, PERMITS AND SERVICE CHARGES - License and permit fees are charged as a means of recovering the cost of regulating various activities. These charges are authorized through the California Government Code and State Constitution. Examples include building permits and business licenses. The City also assesses service charges through user fees on everything from recreation programs to facility rentals. Service charge is also the classification for the Community Services funding allocation from the General Fund to the Temecula Community Services District. It is also the classification for charges back to departments from Internal Service Funds. 210 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program LONG-TERM DEBT - Debt with a maturity of more than one year after the date of issue. LONG-TERM GOALS - An observable and measurable result, having one or more objectives to be achieved within a set time frame. MEASURE C (SPECIAL TAX) - A voter approved special tax charged to property owners in order to finance the operation, maintenance and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial streetlights and traffic signals. The maximum amount for each fiscal year is set by ordinance at $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi -family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non- residential improved property, and $37.22 per acre for agriculture uses. Special Tax is allocated 50% in the General Fund and 50% in the Community Services District. MEASURE S (SALES TAX) - A one cent add -on sales tax, approved by voters on November 8, 2016, to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/afterschool senior, disabled services; improve freeway interchanges/reduce traffic; and other general services. It is estimated that this tax will generate approximately $23 million annually. MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE - Revenue which includes Police charges for services including report copies, fingerprint rolling fees, etc. as well as right of way advertising revenue, charges for planning commission packets and other miscellaneous charges and reimbursements. MODIFIED ACCRUAL BASIS - The accrual basis of accounting adapted to the governmental fund -type measurement focus. Under it, revenues and other financial resource increments are recognized when they become susceptible to accrual that is when they become both "measurable" and "available" to finance expenditures of the current period. Expenditures are recognized when the fund liability is incurred except for (1) inventories of materials and supplies that may be considered expenditures either when purchased or when used. All governmental funds, expendable trust funds and agency funds are accounted for using the modified accrual basis for accounting. MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEE - The motor vehicle license fee (MVLF), also called the motor vehicle in - lieu tax, is a tax on the ownership of a registered vehicle in place of taxing vehicles as personal property. The MVLF is paid annually upon vehicle registration in addition to other fees, such as the vehicle registration fee, air quality fees, and commercial vehicle weight fees all of which fund specific state programs. The MVLF funds City services. OBJECTIVES - The necessary steps to be accomplished in order to achieve a desired goal. OPERATING BUDGET - Plans of current expenditures and the proposed means of financing them. The annual operating budget is the primary means by which most of the financing, acquisition, spending and service delivery activities of a government are controlled. OPERATING TRANSFERS IN/OUT - Authorized exchanges of cash or other resources between funds. 211 The Heart of S—tl-- C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE - Supplies and other materials used in the normal operations of City departments. ORGANIZATION - A unit of operation having specific responsibilities and duties and collectively form an Agency. The terms organization and division is used interchangeably throughout the budget document (i.e., Accounting Organization, Traffic Division, etc.). OTHER TAXES - Classification for all taxes with the exception of property tax and sales and use tax which are defined on their own. Includes Gas Tax, Measure C (Special Tax), Transient Occupancy Tax and Franchise Fees. PROPERTY TAX - A 1% levy upon the assessed valuation of property, as established by Proposition 13 in 1978. PROPERTY TAX IN LIEU OF VLF - A swap from the state of California, where over 90% of California City and county vehicle license fee revenues were exchanged for additional property tax. Subsequent to the Fiscal Year 2004-05 base year, each city's and county's property tax in lieu of VLF increases annually in proportion to the growth in gross assessed valuation in that jurisdiction. RESOURCES - Total amounts available for appropriation including estimated revenues, fund transfers, and beginning balances. REVENUES - The yield of taxes and other sources of income that a governmental unit collects and receives for public use. SALES AND USE TAX - Sales tax applies to the sale of merchandise, including vehicles within the State of California. The use tax applies to the use, storage or other consumption of those same kinds of items within the state. Sales tax applies when physical merchandise is purchased in California and use tax applies when a similar purchase without tax is made from a business located outside the state. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT - A compulsory levy made against certain properties to defray all or part of the cost of a specific capital improvement or service deemed to benefit primarily those properties. SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SARDA) - Successor agency established in order to pay the debts and obligations and to perform the obligated activities of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) due to ABx1 26 which dissolved Redevelopment Agencies. TAXES - Compulsory charges levied by a government to finance services performed for the common benefit. This term does not include specific charges made against particular persons or property for current or permanent benefits, such as special assessments. Neither does the term include charges for services rendered only to those paying such charges. 212 The Heart of S—ti-. C.10. a Wine Caunt,y GLOSSARY OF TERMS City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) - An assessment district that was established in Temecula to provide a comprehensive, balanced neighborhood and community park system by constantly reviewing growth, demographics and facilities available. It also provides street lighting, median and slope maintenance, refuse hauling and a recycling program, emergency dirt road maintenance, library services and an intern fellowship program. TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX - Also called a Hotel Tax, this revenue source originates in a tax placed on lodging facilities for the occupancy of a room. The City of Temecula's Transient Occupancy Tax rate is 8%. TRANSFERS IN/OUT - Payments from one fund to another fund primarily for work or services provided. TRANSFERS TO CIP - Authorized exchanges of cash or other resources to the Capital Improvement Program. UNDESIGNATED FUND BALANCE - Available expendable financial resources in a governmental fund that are not the object of tentative management plans (i.e., designations). UNSPECIFIED - Funds that have not been identified for various proposed projects. USE OF MONEY AND PROPERTY - Classification used for revenue sources which include lease and rental income, as well as investment interest. USER CHARGES/FEES - A sum of money paid by the individual who chooses to access a service or facility. Examples of user fees include building permit fees and recreation class fees. With user fees, the individual directly pays for something he or she wants and receives what he or she has paid for. WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (WRCOG) - WRCOG is a voluntary association that represents Riverside County, 17-member local cities located in Western Riverside County, Eastern Municipal Water District and Western Riverside Water District, that seek to provide cooperative planning, coordination, and technical assistance on issues of mutual concern that cross jurisdictional lines. The primary functions of WRCOG include (a) serve as a forum for consideration, study and recommendation on area -wide and regional problems; (b) assemble information helpful in the consideration of problems peculiar to Western Riverside County; (c) explore practical avenues for intergovernmental cooperation, coordination and action in the interest of local public welfare and means of improvements in the administration of governmental services; and (d) serve as the clearinghouse review body for Federally -funded projects in accordance with Circular A-95 in conjunction with the Southern California Association of Governments. 213 Alk 11 The Heart o(Sout�Gfornia Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENT The City of Temecula, in conjunction with the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA), has invested $41 million in a variety of affordable housing options for Temecula residents, with 704 units completed since the City incorporated in 1989, and 95 of those units funded and completed by the County of Riverside. With an additional investment of $16 million, an additional 143 affordable units have been funded and will be constructed in the future. The developers of the future projects are working to secure the remaining funding via tax credits necessary to begin construction. Cameron Building • 24 rental units for moderate -income households 80% of area median income (AMI) • RDA Investment $3 million • Mixed used building with commercial retail space on the bottom floor and 24 affordable housing units on floors 2-4 Palomar Heritage • 22 rental units for low and moderate -income households 60% and 110%AMI • RDA investment $3.3 million • Mixed used building with commercial retail space on the bottom floor and 22 affordable housing units on floors 2-3 Both the Cameron Building and the Palomar Heritage Building were the first of their kind in Old Town. The projects provided a great opportunity for the City to not only work towards meeting the community's affordable housing needs but also to spur economic development within the Old Town District. The use of affordable housing funds to produce affordable housing and commercial space in a mixed -use building in Old Town allowed the City to leverage the City's affordable housing funds for multiple purposes within the same development. This strategy of investment for the two future affordable housing / mixed use buildings served as a model for two other City -funded developments in Old Town. L 13 L Pnrtnln Tarrnra • 44 rental units for low and very low-income households 50% and 60% AMI • RDA investment $5.5 million • Completed in 2013 Madera Vista • 110 affordable units in larger family -sized apartments • RDA investment $8.4 million • 20 units set aside for seniors The Madera Vista development was originally a private condo development that fell into foreclosure during the Great Recession. The project partially built and in disrepair. The City, along with Bridge Housing utilized affordable housing funds to purchase the property and completed construction. 214 Alk (_(The Heart o(Southem California Wine C—try City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Capital Improvement Program SUMMARY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENT In addition to providing funding to construct affordable housing units, the former Redevelopment Agency invested $524,356 to provide a First -Time Home Buyer Program available to moderate -income households (120% AMI) and assisted 20 First -Time Home Buyers to purchase homes in Temecula. The City of Temecula and the former RDA have partnered with Habitat for Humanity since 2003 to construct five homes for low-income households to purchase. Total RDA investment of $582,000. An additional $700,000 investment with Habitat for Humanity is programmed for a future project to build six for -sale affordable/workforce housing units available to moderate and low-income homebuyers. �.' Illilllllllii The City's primary funding source for affordable housing was the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. In 2012, the State of California disbanded all redevelopment agencies within the State. The City of Temecula serves as the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) and is responsible for the eventual wind down of the remaining RDA obligations, including the investment of the remaining $12.8 million in bond proceeds of the former RDA. Two affordable housing projects have been identified and the City Council has approved funding agreements with developers to provide an additional 137 affordable units. fit•?p.i. i's Vine Creek — Under Construction • 60 rental units for low and very low-income households • 14 units set aside for special needs residents • RDA investment of $6.7 million Las Haciendas — Near Completion • 77 rental units for low and very low-income households • RDA investment $10.2 million • Project will be the first residential development in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area In Fiscal Year 2021-22, the City contributed an additional $4 million to the Vine Creek project and set -aside $1 million in Community Reinvestment Program (CRP) Funds for a future affordable housing development in the Uptown Specific Plan area. Las Haciendas is a catalyst for market rate development. 215 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 DEBT OBLIGATIONS ISSUE BOND MATURITY INTEREST FUND DATE DESCRIPTION RATING* DATE RATES FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 TOTAL DEBT OUTSTANDING PRINCIPAL INTEREST OBLIGATION PRINCIPAL Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 380 2017 2017A AA 12/15/2038 2.00 - 5.00% 1,720,000 1,805,000 3,525,000 35,480,000 380 2017 Tax Allocation Bonds, Series AA 12/15/2039 2.00 - 4.00% 1,140,000 946,144 2,086,144 24,495,000 2017E (Taxable) Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) Total 1 $2,860,000 $2,751,144 $5,611,1441 $59,975,000 TOTALS $2,860,000 $2,751,144 $59,975,000 *The Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, Series 2017A and 2017B were rated by Standard & Poors and assigned an underlying rating of "BBB+" and an insured rating of "AA," per the Official Statement dated December 19, 2017. The City has programmed the use of Debt Financing for the following Capital Improvement Projects: 1) Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project ($9,629,143) in bond proceeds from the Tax Allocation Bond, Series 2017B. 2) Vine Creek Affordable Housing Project ($1,408,281) in bond proceeds from the Tax Allocation Bond, Series 2017B. 216 Alk %QJJ_ City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program STATUS OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM In 2018, the City of Temecula completed the Pavement Management Analysis Report, summarizing the findings of a Pavement Condition Index study performed by Infrastructure Management Services (IMS). Pavement management is the process of planning, budgeting, funding, designing, constructing, monitoring, evaluating, maintaining, and rehabilitating the pavement network to provide maximum benefits with available funds. Streets that are repaired when they are in a good condition will cost less over their lifetime than streets that are allowed to deteriorate to a poor condition. Without an adequate routine pavement maintenance program, streets require more frequent reconstruction, thereby costing millions of extra dollars. Over time, pavement quality drops until the pavement condition becomes unacceptable. Temecula has 325.5 miles of roadways, encompassing over 8.8 million square yards of concrete and asphalt surfacing. At an average replacement cost for a typical roadway just over $1.10 million per mile, not including the value of the land, the City has over $357.7 million invested in its paved roadway network. IMS conducted field surveys, utilizing a Laser Road Surface Tester, to evaluate the overall condition of the pavement and developing a quantitative formula to represent the overall condition of the pavement, known as a Pavement Condition Index (PCI). The PCI rating correlates to the relative remaining life of the road surface. Relative PCI Range Description Definition Remaining Life 85 — 100 Excellent 15 to 25 Years Like new condition — little to no maintenance required when new; routine maintenance such as crack and joint sealing. 70 — 85 Very Good 12 to 20 Years Routine maintenance such as patching and crack sealing with surface treatments such as seal coats or slurries. 60 — 70 Good 10 to 15 Years Heavier surface treatments and thin overlays. Localized panel replacements. 40 — 60 Marginal to Fair 7 to 12 Years Heavy surface -based inlays or overlays with localized repairs. Moderate to extensive panel replacements. 25 — 40 Poor 5 to 10 Years Sections will require very thick overlays, extensive panel replacements, surface replacement, base reconstruction, and possible subgrade stabilization. 0 — 25 Very Poor 0 to 5 Years High percentage of full reconstruction. The study found that the average PCI for Temecula's road network was 65, and is within the average of other agencies surveyed by IMS, which typically fall in the 60 to 65 range. To maintain the current condition of the road network, the City needs to spend approximately $7.4 million per year. An annual budget of $8.24 million per year would increase the PCI from 65 to 67. Since 2018, the City has invested over $9 million per year across several Capital Projects and maintenance programs including the Pavement Rehabilitation Program Capital Project and the neighborhood slurry seal program. In addition, the City established a new set -aside Street Maintenance Fund using Measure S funding to accumulate resources for the future replacement of the City's road network. A new pavement management study began in January 2024 and will be completed in June 2024. Next year's Status of Pavement Management Program will include a summary of relevant findings. 217 Item No. 3 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: May 15, 2024 PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the SUMMARY: construction of an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden; and PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNs: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Steve Kim Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Interstate 15 / Open Space (OS), Low Medium Density Residential (LM) South: First Street, Old Town Front Street, Commercial Buildings / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) East: First Street, Interstate 15, Commercial Building / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Second Street, Commercial Building / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Existing/Proposed Lot Area: 2.15 Acres Parking Provided/Required: 385 Parking Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY Min/Max Allowable or Required 0.08 Acres Minimum 384 Parking Spaces (required) On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim submitted Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilitiesiballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim submitted Planning Application No. PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street On July 26, 2022, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Councilmembers Jessica Alexander and Zak Schwank. A representative of the applicant along with two (2) members of the public were in attendance. There were concerns from the Steering Committee in regard to how the building interacts with Old Town, the "canyon effect" along Second Street, the location of the pool on the eastern and not western side of the building, and the massing of the building. The Steering Committee encouraged the applicant's representative to listen to staff. On September 27, 2022, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Councilmembers Jessica Alexander and Zak Schwank. The applicant team and one (1) member of the public were in attendance. There were concerns from the Steering Committee in regard to how the building interacts with Old Town, the "canyon effect" along Second Street, the location of the pool on the eastern and not western side of the building and the massing of the building as seen at the southern entrance to Old Town. On October 19, 2022, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant was not present for this meeting and staff did provide the comments from this meeting as part of the fourth project comment letter dated October 24, 2022. There were concerns from the Subcommittee in regard to the massing of the building and lack of building articulation along the streets, the entrance to the hotel should be a grand entrance that draws people into the building, location of the pool adjacent to the freeway as opposed to being located on the western side of the building facing and interacting with Old Town, the outside of the building has to be right and fit in Old Town, and that the project should not move forward to Planning Commission unless every development standard in the Specific Plan has been met. On April 25, 2023, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Mayor Zak Schwank and Councilmember Curtis Brown. The applicant team was in attendance. The concerns from the Steering Committee were not a single item but the "totality" of everything and the applicant team was encouraged to continue to work with staff. When the applicant indicated that he wanted to move on to Planning Commission without addressing outstanding staff comments the Steering Committee said to take it to Planning Commission. On May 23, 2023, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Mayor Zak Schwank and Councilmember Curtis Brown. The applicant team was in attendance. The Steering Committee had concerns that nothing had changed since the project was last presented to the Steering Committee and they have a duty as council members to the residents of the City for the project to comply with the Specific Plan. On September 6, 2023, the proposed project was considered by the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. On January 14, 2024, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant's attendance was not requested for this meeting and staff did provide the comments to applicant following the meeting. There was a discussion regarding "standards vs guidelines" and the subcommittee indicated that while there is improvement that had been made to the project the project had not gone far enough. On March 20, 2024, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant's attendance was not requested for this meeting and staff did provide the comments to applicant following the meeting. There was a discussion regarding an architectural design guideline on Page V-19 of the Old Town Specific Plan as it relates to building form and how that pertains to the proposed project and to Old Town. At the conclusion of the meeting the subcommittee recommended that the revised project as a whole be presented to the other Planning Commissioners prior to any public hearing in the form of 1:1 or 2:1 meetings and that the architectural guideline from Page V-19 of the Old Town Specific Plan be added to the staff report. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The proposed project entails a seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel connected to a four (4) level parking garage containing one (1) basement level and three (3) above ground levels housing 385 parking spaces. A floor -by -floor breakdown of the programming of the hotel is as follows: • I" Floor (street level): exterior entrance to the hotel from Old Town Front Street, interior entrance to the hotel from the parking garage, registration area, ballroom, banquet lounge, family restaurant, offices, retail spaces, outdoor dining and back of house uses. • 2nd Floor: ballroom, meeting rooms, day spa facilities including treatment rooms, sauna, steam room and lounges, beauty salon, boutique, restaurant with outdoor dining, kids' room, gym facility, yoga room, and retail outlets. • 3rd Floor: guest rooms including five (5) rooms with decks that overlook Second Street, wedding garden overlooking Old Town Front Street, pool/spa area, and a dog park/run. • 4th Floor to 7th Floor: guest rooms The vehicle access to the proposed project is from both First Street and Second Street utilizing the parking garage which includes a drop off area. The project proposes 385 parking spaces which exceeds the required number of 384 parking spaces accounting for the proposed 355 hotel rooms and approximately 8,507 square feet of meeting space, electric vehicle parking spaces, bike racks, and motorcycle parking. Pedestrian access to the lobby of the hotel is from an entrance off of Old Town Front Street which enters into a hallway that guides guests, tourists, and residents to the lobby. Access to the lobby is also internally from the parking garage, which offers pedestrian entrances from First Street and Second Street that are separated from the vehicle entrances in order to avoid the pedestrian versus vehicle interaction. An entrance on the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street offers a direct entrance into the first floor restaurant and two separate entrances on Second Street provides for access to retail outlets. Outdoor dining is proposed both on Front Street and First Street Architecture The primary architectural style of the proposed project is Neo-Classical Revival which is an allowed architectural style per the Old Town Specific Plan. Style elements included within the design of the project include prominent vertical columns extending from the ground to the top of the first floor and second floor and also from the third floor to the top of the building connecting with the roofline pediments that contain a motif. A decorative horizonal band is utilized between the first and second floors in order to break up the strong massing of the base of the building. A vertical quoin architectural element on the corners of the building assists in the breaking up of the primary stucco element on all building facades. Shopfront and gallery frontages are used interchangeably along the streetscape of the project allowing for outdoor dining and street activation areas. A gallery frontage is proposed along First Street and wraps around the corner onto Front Street which assists in breaking up the massing of the base of the building. The roof of the gallery also provides balcony space off the second floor restaurant which activates the area of First Street below. Second Street combines shopfront and gallery frontages and due to the existing conditions of a cul-de-sac it allows for an additional step back of the massing of the building from Second Street which provides for additional building articulation. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlav Zoning District The proposed project is located within the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District. On May 25, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 10-09 which, among other things, allows for the development of a full service hotel at a greater building height than other buildings in Old Town (up to eight stories and 100 feet in height). This height allowance is an incentive to bring additional economic activity into Old Town including conventions, large meetings, and groups. In order to receive the height incentive and designation of a full service hotel the project is required to meet the development standards of the zoning district in addition to the supplemental requirements which include: • Hotel lobbies shall be located along streets, plazas, courtyards or sidewalks to create visual interest for pedestrians. • Hotel rooms shall be accessed from an interior hallway. • Hotel shall provide an onsite restaurant with table service provided primarily by waitperson, seating for at least thirty customers, and full menu service offering multiple entrees with on -site food preparation. • Hotel shall provide conference facility space to accommodate a minimum of 1,000 people. • Development shall be designed to create an outdoor pedestrian space(s) featuring amenities such as benches, outdoor dining, public art, gardens, courtyard, forecourt or a plaza. • Building facades shall be articulated with wall offsets, recesses, opening, ornamentation, and colors and materials, to add texture with special detail to the streetscape. • Pool and spa facilities are permitted on patios, balconies, or terraces located on the second floor or above when integrated into the building architecture and design. The project, as proposed, meets all the design criteria and development standards of the Hotel Overlay Zoning District. Old Town Specific Plan Design Standards The Old Town Specific Plan provides development standards for all projects within the Old Town Specific Plan area. The standards are intended to ensure that proposed development within the Old Town area occurs in a manner that is consistent with the community's vision for building form, massing, architectural character, and the building's relationship to the street and public realm. All proposed development projects shall be designed in compliance with those standards. At the Planning Commission Meeting on September 6, 2023, staff recommendation was for a redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project failed to meet standards as it related to the pedestrian experience and the building relationship to the street along with the proposed building articulation. The proposed project now meets those standards in the following manner: 5 • Pedestrian Experience and the Building Relationship to the Street The previous project design did not promote or provide a pedestrian friendly experience, atmosphere, or streetscape, enliven the streets, and did not provide a visual interest for pedestrians along any of the frontages along First Street, Second Street, and Front Street other than entrances into the building. The building turned its back to the public realm while containing all elements of the project internal to the building and not incorporating pedestrians. Additionally, outdoor pedestrian space(s) featuring amenities such as benches, outdoor dining were not provided. The revised project design now includes outdoor patio dining along both First Street and Front Street. The hotel entrance along Front Street has been redesigned to include a more angled recessed inviting opening and revised canopy that now extends over both the entrance to the hotel and a new outdoor dining area. Overall, the revisions made to the project enhance the pedestrian experience and building relationship to the street and meet all the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. • Building Articulation The previous project design proposed either a 1-foot or 2-foot building articulation or offset every 50' or less on all sides of the building. The shopfronts facing First Street, Second Street, and Front Street all exceeded 100' and did not propose architectural elements into the facades that conveyed the appearance of multiple shops. The revised project has increased the building articulation or offset to either 2-feet or 3- feet. The repetitive windows along the street frontages have been revised from the same window design on both the first and second floor to arched windows on the second floor and rectangle windows on the first floor while also incorporating three (3) new entrances into retail spaces which breaks up the building facade. The new entrances also provide for multiple shopfronts along the frontage of the building that are distinguished from one another and adds additional character and articulation instead of one large facade. Overall, the revisions made to the project enhance the building articulation and meet all the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. Project Design At the Planning Commission Meeting on September 6, 2023, staff identified design concerns in the form of the corner of Old Town Front Street & First Street and the Second Street pedestrian experience. The proposed project has addressed those design concerns in the following manner: • Corner of Old Town Front Street & First Street The location of this project on the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street provides for a unique opportunity to incorporate corner architectural elements into the project that are the focus of the building. This is the first building that people will see when entering the southern arch of Old Town and has the opportunity to make a statement of a transformative project by incorporating appropriate architectural expression and variation that makes the corner of the building stand apart. The previous project design for the corner of the building was no different than any other portion of the building. The revised project has incorporated a gallery 6 architectural element with a large arch on the corner by extending the gallery on First Street around the corner to Front Street. The roof of the gallery also provides for the ability to provide outdoor dining, which in turn activates the corner of the building and makes a statement as the first building that people will see when entering Old Town via the southern arch. • Second Street Pedestrian Experience Previous Project Design: The length of the building frontage along Second Street is approximately 195'. As previously proposed the Second Street pedestrian experience contained an approximately 900 square foot retail outlet with an entrance which spanned approximately 52' of the frontage (27%), pedestrian and vehicle entrances into the building, a storage room, fire sprinkler riser room, electrical room, and transformer room. Approximately 99' (51 %) of the frontage, as previously proposed, was for "back of the house" uses that did not contribute to the pedestrian experience on a corner in Old Town where, across the street, is a commercial building containing restaurants and retail uses along the first floor. Revised Project Design: The length of the building frontage along Second Street is approximately 195'. As proposed the Second Street pedestrian experience contains an approximately 2,580 square foot retail outlet with an entrance which spans approximately 124' of the frontage (64%), pedestrian and vehicle entrances into the building, and a new second approximately 628 square foot retail outlet with an entrance which spans approximately 25' of the frontage (13%). Retail frontage has been increased from 27% of the frontage to 77% while including a gallery along a portion of the frontage and the "back of the house" uses has been reduced from 51 % to 0% as they have all been relocated to other areas off the proposed project not along the frontage of the building. The revised project design contributes to the pedestrian experience on a corner in Old Town where, across the street, is a commercial building containing restaurants and retail uses along the first floor. As with the previous project design, on the third story are five (5) decks for use by hotel guests staying in those rooms. Additional Design Concerns While the Specific Plan does not provide Development Standards for all aspects of the project, staff has identified design concerns that have been commented on and discussed with the applicant during the entitlement process. Those concerns include: • Architectural Design Guideline Page V-19 of the Old Town Specific Plan details an architectural design guideline related to building form that reads "Variety on street edges was created through the use of various frontage types (galleries, arcades, etc.). Future Buildings in Old Town are encouraged to reinforce this historic pattern through the use of simple and clear building massing, enlivened with various frontage types. Building facades that exceed 50 linear feet should incorporate varying architectural expression, character, and rooflines so as to appear to be up of various smaller facades". This is a design guideline within the Specific Plan and not a development standard and therefore cannot be required to be integrated into the project by staff. • Pool Location The location of the pool facility along and above Interstate 15 has been a concern with staff since the Pre -Application stage of the project. A shade study was requested and provided by the applicant that showed at 3:00 p.m. on the longest day of the year (Summer solstice June 21st) the majority of the pool and pool deck will be located in the shade. Per the Specific Plan pool and spa facilities are permitted on patios, balconies, or terraces located on the second floor or above when integrated into the building architecture and design. While the location of the pool area is integrated into the building design staff has concerns pertaining to noise, automobile emissions, and the amount of shade that occurs over the proposed pool area with a western setting sun. Landscapes The project provides the required street trees along with additional shrubs, accent plantings, and trees on the interior of the project including the pool area and wedding garden. All plant materials proposed are consistent with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map will allow for the conversion of ten existing parcels into a single parcel. The new parcel conforms to the Old Town Specific Plan, the City's Development Code, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. The parcel created meets the minimum parcel size requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. The minimum parcel size allowed in the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District is 3,500 square feet (0.08 acres). The proposed parcel is 2.15 acres. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on May 2, 2024, and mailed to the property owners within a 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In -Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including 8 General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANSUPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore, the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Old Town Specific Plan as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. 9 The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Tentative Maps (Section 16.09.140) The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Parcel Map No. 38349 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, the Municipal Code, and the Old Town Specific Plan. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land, and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property that is suitable and designated for commercial development, which is consistent with the allowable land uses of the Old Town Specific Plan, General Plan, and Development Code. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property and does not propose any grading, construction or development. As conditioned, the project is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as the project site is vacant undeveloped land. 10 The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure compliance with the Building, Development, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions to ensure projects do not cause serious public health problems. Negative impacts are not anticipated. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All required rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). This map is for a non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. PC Resolution — Development Plan 3. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Development Plan 4. Exhibit B - Plan Reductions - Development Plan 5. PC Resolution — Tentative Parcel Map 6. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Tentative Parcel Map 7. Exhibit B - Plan Reductions — Tentative Parcel Map 8. Notice of Exemption 9. Notice of Public Hearing 11 922-072-005 CITY OF TEMECULA PA22-0035 1 inch = 117 feet I:1,400 i 0 100 200 Feet I I I I I lino Hear of Southern CaicforNa Date Created: 1/26/2022 W 0Country The map PA22-0035.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at hftps://temeculaca.gov/gis PC RESOLUTION NO.2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0035, DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 288,269 SQUARE FOOT, 355 ROOM, SEVEN (7) STORY, 91-FOOT, FULL SERVICE HOTEL THAT INCLUDES AN APPROXIMATELY 174,382 SQUARE FOOT PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0035 a Development Plan. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0037 a Tentative Parcel Map. These applications (collectively "Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. On September 6, 2023, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on May 15, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0035, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore, the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Old Town Specific Plan as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land not designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In -Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANSUPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plan Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of May, 2024. Bob Hagel, Chair ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of May, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA22-0035 Project Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1st Street and 2nd Street. Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: New Street In -lieu of Fee: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION 922-072-005 922-072-007 922-072-010 922-072-011 922-072-013 922-072-016 922-072-018 922-072-020 922-072-021 922-072-023 Commercial Service Commercial Service Commercial/Office N/A (non-residential) N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) May 15, 2024 May 15, 2027 Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 22 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. General Requirements 2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Page 2 of 22 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5). 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 10. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 11. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. Page 3 of 22 12. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Stucco White Duck (SW 7010) Stucco Pure White (SW 7005) Limestone Picard Jaune - Brushed Metal Railings & Canopies Rookwood Dark Brown (SW 2808) Moldings Double Latte (SW 9108) 13. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 14. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 15. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 16. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover or located indoors and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 20. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 21. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. Page 4 of 22 22. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at their sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development." 23. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 24. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment." 25. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." 26. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 27. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." Page 5 of 22 28. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." 29. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on -site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on -site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. Page 6 of 22 30. Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s). i. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find. ii. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources. iii. Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. iv. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in -place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re -burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non -Disclosure of Reburial Condition. v. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan. vi. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. Page 7 of 22 31. Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: Preservation -In -Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property (as identified on Burial Area Exhibit). The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. 32. Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report, if required, and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre -grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s). 33. Training Session. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified biologist shall conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The session shall meet the requirements of JPR #22-01-26-01." 34. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall provide evidence of compliance with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project Review letter (JPR# 22-01-26-01) dated May 24, 2022. Page 8 of 22 35. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 36. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 37. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 38. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 39. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. Page 9 of 22 40. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 41. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 42. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 43. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 44. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 45. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 46. Precise Gradinq Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. Page 10 of 22 47. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 48. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 49. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 50. Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 51. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 52. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 53. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 54. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 55. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. Outside Agencies Page 11 of 22 56. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated January 25, 2022, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 57. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Healths transmittal dated October 18, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 58. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated January 20, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 59. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated February 16, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 60. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated August 29, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 61. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project Review letter (JPR# 22-01-26-01) dated May 24, 2022, a copy of which is attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 62. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 63. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 64. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 65. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 66. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; and b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right-of-way 67. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. Page 12 of 22 68. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 70 71 72 Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as Caltrans and other affected agencies. Right -of -Way Vacation. The Developer shall submit a Right -of -Way Vacation application to Public Works for review and approval. a. Old Town Front Street Right -of -Way Dedication. The Developer shall submit a Right -of -Way Dedication application to Public Works for review and approval. a. Second Street 73. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 74. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 75. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml Page 13 of 22 76. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 77. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 78. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 79. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 80. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 81. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 82. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 83. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non -compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. Page 14 of 22 Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 84. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 85. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 86. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 87. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 88. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City's General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve First Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Second Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. Improve Old Town Front Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 89. Under -grounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 90. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 91. Right -of -Way Vacation. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall provide a copy of the recorded Right -of -Way Vacation. a. Old Town Front Street 92. Right -of -Way Dedication. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall provide a copy of the recorded Right -of -Way Dedication. a. Second Street Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Page 15 of 22 93. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. Rehabilitation of street frontage shall be 4-inch asphalt concrete over class II base full -width curb -to -curb at the discretion of the City Engineer upon project completion. 94. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 95. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 96. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 97. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 98. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 99. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Including Section 1206 of the California Building Code. 100. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 101. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. Page 16 of 22 102. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 103. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 104. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 105. Obtaininq Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 106. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 107. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 108. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 109. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 110. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance -rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 111. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 '/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For this Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system to meet fire flow requirements. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants, public or private may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 112. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Page 17 of 22 113. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for this commercial project. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. For fire hydrants serving this property, any public fire hydrants will be required to meet the required fire flow if there are not enough designated private fire hydrants to meet this. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 114. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and a clear unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. no equipment is able to or allowed to impede in the 24-feet fire lanes. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 115. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather paved surface roads, minimum of 24-feet in clear unobstructed width, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 116. Turning Radius. Minimum outside turning radius on any dead-end shall be 45 feet for commercial projects 117. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 118. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 119. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 120. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish an electronic submittal of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. the hydrants will be required to meet the fire flow requirements set forth in these conditions of approval. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued. Page 18 of 22 121. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing C-16 contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. If plans are not submitted by the actual installing C-16 contractor, then they will be required to be designed and submitted by a Fire Protection Engineer (FPE), no other engineer stamps will be accepted. Once the engineered plans are approved and a contract is awarded then the actual C-16 sprinkler contractor can be added to the permit. The C-16 contractor cannot make any changes to the approved engineered plans and will have to install the system based on the approved plans. Any changed to the approved engineered plans will require a re -submittal prior to moving forward with any inspections. These plans will be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits. 122. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted by the installing C-10 contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. If plans are not submitted by the actual installing C-10 contractor, then they will be required to be designed and submitted by a Fire Protection Engineer (FPE), no other engineer stamps will be accepted. Once the engineered plans are approved and a contract is awarded then the actual C-10 fire alarm contractor can be added to the permit. The C-10 contractor cannot make any changes to the approved engineered plans and will have to install the system based on the approved plans. Any changed to the approved engineered plans will require a re -submittal prior to moving forward with any inspections. The fire alarm system is also required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans will be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 123. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with a Knox system. Gates will be required to have a key pad with electronic access as well as Opticom for emergency access by firefighting personnel. 124. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 125. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height above finished floor and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room. This box will house all the keys for the facility (CFC Chapter 5). 126. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 127. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate fire lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 128. Additional Submittals (Fire Above/Below Ground Tanks). The developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any underground and/or aboveground tank permits that will be installed and used onsite for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health Department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 57 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). Page 19 of 22 129. Additional Submittals (Hazardous Materials). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report. A full hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any building storing or using hazardous materials. If pool chemicals will be stored on site they will need to be disclosed in this package along with where they will be stored. (CFC Chapters 1 and 50 through 67 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 130. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 131. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 132. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 133. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 134. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 135. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 136. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 137. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 138. Outdoor Liqhtinq During Non -Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non -business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non -business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. Page 20 of 22 139. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 140. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 141. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 142. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 143. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 144. ADA Parkinq. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 145. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. 146. Compliance with State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 147. Inspections and Training. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. 148. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 149. Employee Training for Identification Checks. The applicant shall ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Office at (951) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training should be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training should be conducted when new employees/management are hired. 150. Identification Verification. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card (active/reserve/retired/dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. Page 21 of 22 151. Acceptable Forms of Identification. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of business owners and any person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. 152. Crime Prevention Throuqh Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 153. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 154. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. Page 22 of 22 JASON E. UHLEY General Manager -Chief Engineer City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 Attention: Scott Cooper 191 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT January 25, 2022 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org 242043 Re: PA 22-0035, APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -018, -020, -021 and -023 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received January 19, 2022. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ❑X This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ❑ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ❑ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. City of Temecula - 2 - January 25, 2022 Re: PA 22-0035, APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -018, -020, 242043 -021 and -023 ❑X This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (❑Murrieta Valley Temecula Valley ❑ Santa Gertrudis Valley ❑Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ❑ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, . For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ❑ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy WMC:blm County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 • RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 JEFF JOHNSON, DIRECTOR October 18, 2022 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA — PA22-0035 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA DP (APN:922-072-005) Dear Mr. Cooper: The project listed in the subject heading is proposing a development plan to allow a full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a weddin garden. It will be located on the east side of Front Street between 1' and 2nd Street, in the city of Temecula. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s) listed in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER This project is proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB) Prior to conducting a building permit final, the facility shall require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 358- 5055 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES — PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD/POOL FACILITY Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate food plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite "A" Murrieta CA 92563 Please contact your local DES office located in Murrieta at (951)461-0284. LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY (LEA) Any persons engaged in the business or performance of tattooing, body piercing, branding and the application of permanent cosmetics as defined in Health and Safety Code 119300 et sec. must obtain approval from the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health LEA. Contact the County of Riverside LEA at (951)955-8980 for any plan check and/or permitting requirements. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim&rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Program Chief Department of Environmental Health City of Temecula PA22-0035 �`` EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT January 20, 2022 Scott Cooper City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Case No.: PA22-0035 —Temecula Resort & Spa DP APN: 922-072-005 Location: North corner of First St and Old Town Front St Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven story, 90- foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden. Dear Scott Cooper: The subject project will require sewer service from EMWD, with the potential requirement for on -site and offsite facilities and associated easementsto adequately serve the projectdemands from existing EMWD facilities. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD's Design Conditions (DC), formerly known as Plan of Service (POS), to be developed by the project proponent. To that end, EMWD requires beginning dialogue with the project proponent at an early stage in site design and development, via a one -hour complimentary Due Diligence meeting. To set up this meeting, the project proponent should complete a Project Questionnaire (form NBD-058) and submitto EMWD. To download this form orfor additional information, please visit our "New Development Process" web page, under the "Business" tab, at www.emwd.org. This meeting will offer the following benefits: 1. Describe EMWD's development work -flow process 2. Identify project scope and parameters 3. Preliminary, high level review of the projectwithin the context of existing infrastructure 4. Discuss potential candidacy for recycled water service �`` EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Following the Due Diligence meeting, to proceed with this project, the Design Conditions (DC) will need to be developed bythe developer's engineer, and reviewed/approved by EMWD prior to submitting improvement plans for Plan Check. The DC process will provide the following: 1. Technical evaluation of the project's preliminary design 2. Defined facility and easement requirements, i.e. approved DC 3. Potential facility oversizing and cost estimate of EMWD's participation 4. Exception: for feasibility evaluation of purchase acquisition, only a conceptual facilities assessment may be developed. If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 928-3777, extension 4468 or by email at El-hagem@emwd.org. Sincerely, o�la�vr uMaroun El-Hage, MPA, MS, PE Principal Civil Engineer Development Services Department Eastern Municipal Water District MEH:Im Attach ment(s)/Enclosure(s): Copyof the Public Notice, EMWD Sewer& Easement Exhibit c: .ice emwd Temecula Resort & SPA DP I 7`r4.. �4 \ • 1 G\ a� r OFS,S, y �s9. • J� y�, f. ,I i \ .h G �' • S'Q oQ 'I TEMEC�U L I (ABN � ,IT L3 0�7 ►`V M AQI�% SCALE 1: 1,876 GIS data shown is for informational purposes only, is subject to change without notice and may not be suitable 0 469 Feet for legal, engineering, construction, or surveying purposes. Information should be reviewed against reliable sources to ascertain its usability. Eastern Municipal Water District assumes no liability for any incorrect results, any lost profits and direct, special, indirect or consequential damages to any party, arising out of or in connection Map Produced 01/20/2022 By EMWD Staff © EMWD with the use or the inability to use the data hereon or the services. Legend Swr Interagency Tie Swr Manhole Cleanout Manhole Monitoring Sampling Shallow Swr Main — As Built, Collection — As Built, Distribution — As Built, Effluent Force — As Built, Influent Force — As Built, Transmission —• CIP, Collection —• CIP, Effluent Force —• CIP, Influent Force —• CIP, Transmission Swr Main Abandoned — Swr Main Murrieta - Streets Q Swr Lift Station Swr Lift Station Polygon Swr Treatment Plant L ; EMWD District Boundary * EMWD Main Office Notes APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -020, -021, & -023 N CORNER OF FIRST ST & OLD TOWN FRONT ST IN TEMECULA (P February 16, 2022 Rancho Case Planner City of Temecula Water 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY Board of Directors FRONT STREET BETWEEN 2ND STREET AND 11T STREET Carol LeeGonzales•Brady LOT NOS. 1 THROUGH 24, BLOCK 17 OF MAP BOOK NO. 1S1726 President APNS 922-072-OOS, 922-072-007, 922-072-010, 922-072-011, John V. Rossi 922-072-013, 922-072-016, 922-072-018, 922-072-020, Senior Vice President 922-072-021, AND 922-072-023 Brian J.Brady [STEVE KIM LIVING TRUST] Angel Garcia JohnE- Hoagland Dear Case Planner: William E. Plummer Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within Bill Wilson the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (Rancho Water/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 24-inch diameter Officers water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Second Street and an existing 24-inch Robert S. Grantham diameter water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) within Old Town Front Street. General Manager Please refer to the enclosed exhibit map. Eva Plajzer, P.E. Assistant General Manager Water service to the subject project/property does not exist. Additions or Engineering and Operations modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Jason A. Martin Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the Director of Administration completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property Eileen Dienzo Director of Human Resources owner. KelliE. Garcia Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within District Secretary James B. Gilpin dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be Best Best & Krieger LLP required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water General Counsel services/meters for domestic service, fire service, and landscape irrigation service, as applicable. Beginning in 2018, newly constructed multi -unit residential structures are required to measure the quantity of water supplied to each individual residential dwelling unit. Where private on -site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such 'common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association, Rancho Water requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants, codes, and restrictions. 22\EP:rm010\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www.ranchowater.com Case Planner/City of Temecula February 16, 2022 Page Two Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to Rancho Water. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to Rancho Water's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5 and subject to a Notice of Determination by Rancho Water, the project/property may be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and/or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from Rancho Water. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact Rancho Water for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact Rancho Water for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board, health department, and/or other requirements as they relate to the protection of groundwater quality, pursuant to Rancho Water's Groundwater Protection Policy. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Technician at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Erica Peter Senior Engineering Technician Enclosure: Exhibit Map cc: Jeff Kirshberg, Water Resources Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor Steve Kim EG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589.9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www.ranchowater.com N O N O -� N 00 N O ldJ N o �sd, N �w N N (O O (V Oi O 04 M O N N O m 04 N rl- LO O O N O N N rl- O O N O N O N O) N r- r- O 9 M N N O N 0) , N 1 O T N N O 5� d� sP�oJ� y�Alp s p f Le i g h t o n 1 Anniversary 25c/ Leighton Consulting, Inc. A Leighton Group Company August 29, 2022 Project No. 11760.032 City of Temecula, Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review Comments #3 (Final) Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa (PA22-0035) 11t Street and Front Street, Temecula, California References: R.T. Frankian & Associates, Addendum to Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021- 011-001, dated April 13, 2022. R.T. Frankian & Associates, Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021-011-001, dated January 18, 2022. R.T. Frankian & Associates, Response to Geotechnical Peer Review #2, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021-011-01., dated June 24, 2022. In accordance with your request, we performed a peer review of the above referenced soils reports to confirm compliance with the requirements of the 2019 California Building Code, applicable Local and State technical guidelines, and standard of care typically used in this area and for this type of construction. Based on this review, the referenced geotechnical investigation report and subsequent clarifications/responses are considered adequate from a geotechnical design submittal perspective. Please note that our opinion/ peer review is to help the City in their review process of the submitted documents and the consultant remains solely responsible for their findings and recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC ft 1421 V CEF >EI RED Jr#i-INEERING Robert F. Riha, CEG oeaLo°1 Senior Principal Geologist !�1 Ext 8914 rriha@leightongroup.com, Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF copy via email) tw95 V. P. "� 1 GE 2724 i .] t V ►�' 5 Expires 613WI .. Carlos Amante, PE, GE 0. �v Principal Engineer STq GZECYI� Ext 1682 camante@leightongroup.co �EOP 41715 Enterprise Circle N, Suite 103, Temecula, CA 92590 www.leightongroup.com T: 951.296.0530 egional onserr►ation Authority Western Riverside County Project Information Permittee: Case Information: RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings Site Acreage: Portion of Site Proposed for MSHCP Conservation Area: JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 City of Temecula PA22-0035/LR21-1000/Temecula Resort and Sua 3.00 acres (2.81 acres of permanent impacts and 0.19 acre of temporary impacts) 0 acres Criteria Consistency Review Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements with implementation of the measures presented in these Findings (including any within the project information provided to the Regional Conservation Authority by the Permittee for this JPR). Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed Linkage 10 Area Plan: Southwest Area APN Sub -Unit Cell Group Cell 922-072-005, 922-072-007', SU1 — Murrieta Creek N/A 7166 922-072-010,922-072-011, 922-072-013,922-072-016, 922-072-018,922-072-020, 922-072-021,922-072-022, 922-072-023,922-075-001', 922-360-002' Project Information a. Project Documentation. JPR submittal materials provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application Form (January 3, 2022), a General Biological Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Report (Report) prepared by Hernandez Environmental Services (May 2022), a City of Temecula Transmittal Worksheet (January 7, 2022), a City of Temecula Conformance Memo (March 31, 2022), a City of Temecula HANS Application (March 11, 2022) a Site Plan (November 5, 2021), GIS Shape Files (January 18, 2022), and a HANS Consistency Report prepared by Hernandez Environmental Services (March 31, 2022). Denotes APNs that are partially impacted. egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County b. Project Location. The proposed project site is located within the City of Temecula, adjacent to Old Town Front Street, west of 1 st Street, and east of 2nd Street. The center point latitude and longitude for the project site are 33°29'31.8794" North and 117°08'45.7552" West (Exhibit A). The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the MSHCP Area (Exhibit B). c. Project Description. The 3.00-acre project proposes the development of an approximately 474,137 square - foot, seven story, 90-foot high, full -service hotel that includes the following: a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full -service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden. The proposed project contains 0.19 acre of temporary impacts, including staging areas, and 2.81 acres of permanent impacts. All construction staging areas will occur within the 3.00-acre development. The proposed project does not include fuel modification zones, detention basins, or other water quality features. No conservation or avoidance areas are proposed as part of the project (Exhibit E). According to the Report, the site is currently being used as a public parking lot (comprised of compacted gravel and some paved areas). The surrounding land uses include existing industrial development to the south, east, and west, and Interstate 15 Freeway to the north. The property is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 977 to 1017 feet above sea level. The vegetation on the site consists entirely of disturbed habitat. Soils within the project site consist of three soil types, 1.) Chino silt loam, drained, 2.) Chino silt loam, drained, saline -alkali, and 3.) Hanford coarse sandy loam. None of these soils are directly related to or support NEPSSA, CASSA, Delhi Sands Flower -loving Fly, or other sensitive species (Exhibit D). Relation to Reserve Assembly a. Reserve Assembly Summary. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, "Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 consists of Murrieta Creek, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. This Constrained Linkage connects Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Proposed Linkage 10 in the south. This Linkage is constrained along most of its length by existing urban Development and agricultural use and the planned land use surrounding the Linkage consists of city (Murrieta and Temecula). Therefore, care must be taken to maintain high quality riparian Habitat within the Linkage and along the edges for species such as yellow warbler, yellow -breasted chat, and least Bell's vireo, which have key populations located in or along the creek. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also important to western pond turtle and arroyo chub in this area. Guidelines Pertaining to Urban/Wildlands Interface for the management of edge factors such as lighting, urban runoff, toxics, and domestic predators are presented in Section 6.1.4 of this document [MSHCP]." "Proposed Linkage 10 consists of an upland connection in the southwest region of the Plan Area extending from Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Existing Core G (Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve) in the south. Private lands compose the entirety of the Linkage, which 2 egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County consists of upland Habitat complementary to the riparian Linkage provided between these two Cores by Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 (Murrieta Creek). This Linkage, which is only somewhat constrained by existing urban Development, provides for movement between these two Cores for species such as bobcat and mountain lion. Although the Linkage is somewhat lengthy at 5.5 miles, it is also nearly a mile wide and thus provides Live -In Habitat for many species. Surrounding planned land uses are approximately evenly divided between Rural Mountainous and city (Murrieta, Temecula). In areas of the Linkage bordering Cities, treatment of edge conditions will be necessary to maintain the proper Habitat and movement functions of the Linkage." The project site is located within Cell 7166, independent of a Cell Group. As stated in Section 3.3.15 of the MSHCP, "Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed Linkage 10. Conservation within this Cell will focus on riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat along Murrieta Creek and on additional chaparral habitat within the Cell. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7079 to the north, to chaparral, grassland, riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7264 to the south and to chaparral habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7164 to the west. Conservation within this Cell will range from 35%-45% of the Cell focusing in the southwestern portion of the Cell." Cell 7166 totals approximately 139 acres. Using the mid -range (40%) conservation goal, approximately 56 acres are described for conservation within this approximate 139-acre Cell. To date, 129.4 acres have been developed or are approved for development in this Cell, which includes the 3.00-acre proposed project acreage and 18.2 acres of covered roads acreage. With no lands conserved to date, approximately 56 acres are still needed for conservation in order to achieve the mid -range goal of 56 acres. There are approximately 9.6 undeveloped acres available within the Cell, of which approximately 9.0 acres are potentially available within areas described for conservation (specifically Proposed Constrained Linkage 13). In summary, with no lands conserved to date and 9.0 undeveloped acres available for conservation that could also functionally contribute to PCL-13, Cell 7166 could not achieve the mid -range goal of 56 acres or the low -range goal of 49 acres, meaning that it is not possible for this Cell to achieve its Reserve Assembly goal. However, the proposed project is located within the northeastern corner of the Cell, outside of the area described for conservation. More importantly, the project site is surrounded by development on all sides, and conservation of this site would not functionally contribute to the conservation of Proposed Constrained Linkage-13 (Murrieta Creek) or Proposed Linkage 10. While Cell 7166 cannot achieve its conservation goal, conservation of the proposed project would not provide any biological resource function or value, nor impede the conservation goals for Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 nor Proposed Linkage 10, nor result in issues regarding fragmentation. b. Rough Step. The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 5. As stated in Section 4 of the MSHCP 2020 Annual Report, "Rough Step Unit 5 encompasses 91,734 acres within the southwestern corner of western egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County Riverside County and includes the Santa Rosa Plateau, the Tenaja Corridor, and Murrieta Creek (see Figure 4- 6, Rough Step Unit #5). This Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the east, San Diego County to the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest to the west and north. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 5 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-8, Rough Step Unit 5 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals. Through 2020, a total of 534 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 5. Losses to this unit total 934 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 185 acres of coastal sage scrub, 150 acres of grasslands, 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 212 acres of woodlands and forests. The riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation category is out of rough step by 0.39 acre. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring riparian scrub, woodland, forest back into Rough Step for Unit 5. The total acreage needed is 2.23 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest." Baseline vegetation (1994) for the area of the proposed project site located within Criteria Cell 7166 consists of grassland and developed or disturbed land. Developed or disturbed land is not tracked for Rough Step. Based on the above discussion, the grasslands portion of the project site does not conflict with Rough Step (Exhibit Q. The Rough Step Unit 5 development allowance may have changed by the time this project submits for a grading permit. As such, the RCA provides the following required Measure to ensure the City does not exceed Rough Step allowances: ROUGH STEP MEASURE. In accordance with MSHCP Volume I, Section 6.7, it is the Permittees responsibility that [ilf the rough step rule is not met during any analysis period (performed annually by the Regional Conservation Authority [RCA]), the Permittees must conserve appropriate lands supporting a specified vegetation community within the analysis unit to bring the Plan back into the parameters of the rule prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation community for which the rule was not achieved The Permittee is encouraged to consult with the RCA on current rough step allowances prior to working with project applicants developing grading plans. The Permittee must not cause additional loss of any rough step vegetation that is out of balance. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Permittee will confirm with the RCA that the Project will not impact out -of -balance Rough Step vegetation in the applicable Rough Step unit. .19 egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County Other Plan Requirements (MSHCP Volume 1) Section 6.1.2 — Was Riparian/Riverine/Vemal Pool Mapping or Information Provided? Yes. There are no Riparian/Riverine areas on the project site. There are no vernal pools on the project site, and the soils and topography present on the site do not support habitat considered suitable for fairy shrimp. There is no suitable riparian bird habitat on the project site. Section 6.1.3 — Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area. Section 6.3.2 — Was Additional Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located in a Criteria Area Species Survey Area for plants. The project site is not located in Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Areas for amphibians or small mammals. The project site does not support Delhi sands (Exhibit D) or in areas that would trigger additional review for Delhi sands flower -loving fly. However, the project site is located in an Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area for burrowing owl. Section 6.1.4 — Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided? Yes. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. Comments on Other Plan Requirements: a. Section 6.1.2. The following discusses each requirement under this policy. Riparian/Riverine. The project site was assessed on October 8, 2021 to determine the presence/absence of riparian/riverine features. The project consists of disturbed land and there were no riparian/riverine features within nor adjacent to the project site. Vernal Pools/Fairy Shrimp. The project site lacks topography and vegetation to support vernal pools. The proposed project site does not contain evidence of ponded water, seasonally inundated road ruts nor other seasonally -inundated depressions exhibiting cracked soils. Historical aerial images revealed that areas within the project site tended to hold water more in February 2016, October 2016 and January 2020; however, site visits conducted in October 2021 and May 2022 showed no evidence of this. Furthermore, during the site visit in May 2022, it was found the site had been further disturbed and is currently being used as a public parking lot (see photos in Report, Appendix Q. The areas where puddles/ponded water occurred in historical aerial images have been paved over or are now covered in gravel and are continually impacted by the frequent use of motor vehicles on the site. Finally, no clay soils or heavy soils were mapped within the project site. Due to the lack of vernal pools and/or other conditions suitable for fairy shrimp, focused surveys for fairy shrimp were not conducted for this project. 5 egional onserr►ation Authority Western Riverside County Riparian Birds. No suitable riparian habitat was found on site that would support riparian birds, including least Bell's vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and western yellow -billed cuckoo. Therefore, no focused riparian bird surveys were conducted. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 Based on the information provided in the Report, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. b. Section 6.1.3 NEPSSA Plants. Based on the information provided in the Report, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. c. Section 6.3.2. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The following describes Additional Survey Needs and Procedures applicable to the proposed project: CASSA Plants. The project site is not located within a CASSA Plants survey area; therefore, focused CASSA Plant surveys were not conducted for this project. Burrowing Owl. The project site is located within a burrowing owl survey area. A Step 1 habitat assessment and a Step II -A focused burrow survey were conducted concurrently on October 8, 2021. According to the Report, the project site does not provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl due to the heavily compacted soils and a lack of ground squirrel burrows or constructed structures that could function as burrow surrogates. Therefore, it was determined that suitable habitat for burrowing owl was not present and Step II-B surveys were not conducted. The project site was revisited in May 2022 and revealed the site had undergone further disturbance and is now being actively used as a public parking lot. The project site appears to have been recently partially paved and had gravel and parking lines painted on it. Based on the information provided by in the Report, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. d. Section 6.1.4. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. Although the project site is not adjacent to or connected to any MSHCP Conservation Areas, the guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 related to controlling adverse effects for development adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area should be considered by the Permittee in their actions relative to the project. However, the following guidelines may still apply during project construction. Therefore, the Permittee should consider the following measures as project conditions of approval, as applicable: SECTION 6.1.4 MEASURE. i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Conservation Areas. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm downstream biological resources or ecosystems. 6 egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County ii. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts, such as manure, that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, Habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest risk is from landscaping fertilization overspray and runoff. iii. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area and the avoided area on site to protect species from direct night lighting. iv. Proposed noise -generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas, shall incorporate setbacks, berms, or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations, and guidelines related to land use noise standards. v. Avoid use of invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in approving landscape plans for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, including avoidance areas. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas and designated avoidance areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls, topography, and other features. vi. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate, in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass, or dumping into existing and future MSHCP Conservation Areas. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage, and/or other appropriate mechanisms. vii. Manufactured slopes associated with proposed site development shall not extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. viii. Weed abatement and fuel modification activities are not permitted in the Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas. c. Appendix C. The following best management practices (BMPs), as applicable, shall be implemented for the duration of construction: APPENDIX C MEASURE. i. A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are 7 egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished. ii. Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance with RWQCB requirements. iii. The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible. iv. The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral limits of disturbance on either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by the biologist prior to initiation of work. v. Projects should be designed to avoid the placement of equipment and personnel within the stream channel or on sand and gravel bars, banks, and adjacent upland habitats used by target species of concern. vi. Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in sensitive habitats should be timed to avoid the breeding season of riparian species identified in MSHCP Global Species Objective No. 7. vii. When stream flows must be diverted, the diversions shall be conducted using sandbags or other methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing of other sediment trapping materials shall be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the transport of sediments off site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected shall be cleaned out in a manner that prevents the sediment from reentering the stream. Care shall be exercised when removing silt fences, as feasible, to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the stream. viii. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFG [CDFW], RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas. ix. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other similar debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks. x. The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint. egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings onservation JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Authority Date: 05/24/22 Western Riverside County xi. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species. xii. Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently removed from the site to the extent feasible. xiii. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s). xiv. Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas. xv. The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects including any restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions, including these BMPs. 0 egional onserr►ation Authority Western Riverside County RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 10 JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 owl /0, .4 0, do, do, 'o, d .0 do, do, do, do, e 01 10 do, 7 7spe S RANCHO MESA RD A� 10 o O 1AHORCA')-- '-and of ,sement 10, 10, 10 01 &* 10, ? kSANTXR SA NER Proposed Linkages: -• Constrained Linkage Linkage •— • Existing Channel Existing Cores & Linkages: Constrained Linkage Core Linkage Noncontiguous Habitat Block Proposed Cores & Habitat Blocks: • Core M Proposed Extension of Existing Cores = Noncontiguous Habitat Block SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (WRC-RCA). Map created on 21112022 r14488 Permittee: City of Temecula n.ervman �.q Miles 4 3 • ■ 19 n 8 1 k.." ♦ice _.� tdft� 1 JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 5 1 r 4 1 �•" 23 B r� 3 5 6 7 1 P14 13 it 5 tr EXHIBIT B JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages SOURCE: WRC-RCA MSHCP Baseline Vegetation (1994). Map created on 5/19/2022. r14488 e Permittee: City of Temecula 0 75 150 Feet EXHIBIT C JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Vegetation a 0 0 JPR Project Boundary 77 Temporary Impact Soil Types Arbuckle gravelly loam, 2 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Arlington and Greenfield fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes, eroded Chino silt loam, drained Chino silt loam, drained, saline -alkali Domino silt loam, saline -alkali Garretson very fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Greenfield sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, eroded Hanford coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes Ramona and Buren sandy loams,15 to 25 percent slopes, severely eroded Ramona sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, eroded Riverwash Criteria Cell *OV Highway /\/ Centerline SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2020; County of Riverside 2020; USDAMRCS Soils 2017 r14488 o Permittee: City of Temecula onaervman by 0 70 140 0— Feet r AM M EXHIBIT D JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Soil ~ k IL Q JPR Project Boundary MSCHP Covered Road Permanent Impact (2.81 ac.) Q Criteria Cell Temporary Impact (0.19 ac.) �� City Boundary Parcel Boundary Highway Centerline SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2022; County of Riverside 2022; Esri Basemap 2022. Map created on 5/19/2022. r14488 e�o�at e Permittee: City of Temecula ons�rvsNan 0 75 150 Feet 1ti NO PROPOSED AVOIDANCE OR CONSERVATION AREAS LW'- tr' � U EXHIBIT E JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Conservation and Avoidance Areas VICINITY MAP r�. e� ''Puoll�q �9Nrl Sleifing A'o wamvmmm�a =emiwkmnq vlper�nuey�ll� geucweyue � �y m Mme23unes By 'F� ' d 9raFelonn TZ Ee�CJn� � ''• pro GlAomu a ,a!SeAn:e9 tnacONp�eirt © .Aiala,Ye:[a v- [link iemt[yle� CW �xnmM'he[F.cniq gone Txo iT :•z fianrv/s AtLc9 ��_. _� y=•- Ten AftD 1— rnl� do elf it w ��P�r frmq , - rkd =T mec,lap q Mxs�u� Y�II„�A raa�me•s: , T PROJECT LOCATION gia�v.nnuHiiirmen,. i g �� CI�c Z�inFM'r. . �y wAxren� 9i,Anrn��f=em�-iia �yd"� p�gyppl n... ^•,.y E: —;Tmraov I[n•.iie Teaa r.i�•v� " s ant A:1 J—CoMq., t N ids Wmid pre•.cTaa g w v3nm�•.xa�� ■ a . x„r stnaere sowrse=rIt t• �. rd 8 �o :� i+aolRmecme w nnxirers �me cwoq s i sdaue aparonemsq �. ® � r , � ,nll�rnnP sne.v*7 Cemn-}��Ieq �'4y OWNER STEVE Y. KIM LIVING TRUST 3785 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #2211 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010. PHONE: (213)700-6883 PROJECT ARCHITECT ONESTOP DESIGN, INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD. LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 PHONE: (213) 880-0452 CONTACT: ANDREW H. KIL AIA, LEED AP STRUCTURAL ENGINEER LEE & LEE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING INC. 3550 WWILSHIRE BLVD., #480 LOS ANGELES, CA, 90010 PHONE: (213) 351-0034 CONTACT: SANG LEE, SE PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX CIVIL ENGINEER: VALUED ENGINEERING INC. 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, #C102 UPLAND, CA 91786 Phone: (909) 982-4601 CONTACT: JEFF MEITER, CE Al - SITE PLANS & DATA A1.1 SITE PLAN A2 - FLOOR PLANS A2.1 B1 LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: A2.2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN (L1/P1) SQLA INC. A2.3 2ND FLOOR PLAN (L2/P2) 2669 SATURN ST. A2.4 P3 LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN BREA, CA 92821 A2.5 3RD FLOOR PLAN ( PODIUM LEVEL) PHONE: (562) 905-0800 A2.6 TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (4TH-7TH FLOOR) CONTACT: SERENA SUN A2.7 ROOF FLOOR PLAN MECHANICAL. ELECTRICAL. & PLUMBING ENGINEER: INNODEZ, INC. 5777 WEST CENTRURY BLVD., #1110 LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 PHONE: (424)414-0997 CONTACT: FATE OLI A3 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION - OVERALL A3.2 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION - OVERALL A4 - BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.2 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.3 BUILDING SECTIONS A5-DETAILS A5.1 ENLARGED DETAILS- 1ST AND 2ND STREET A5.2 ENLARGED DETAILS- FRONT STREET A5.3 EXTERIOR WALL OPENING CALCULATION DIAGRAM A6 - RENDERINGS A6.1 3D RENDERINGS A6.2 3D RENDERINGS A6.3 3D RENDERINGS A6.4 3D RENDERINGS A7 - MATERIAL BOARD A7.1 COLORS & MATERIALS A7.2 COLORS & MATERIALS A7.3 COLORS & MATERIALS 1-1-LANDSCAPE 1-1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN @ GROUND LEVEL 1-1.1 L3 (PODIUM) LEVEL LANDSCAPE PLAN ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. COVER SHEET SCALE: 1211 = 1 1-0'r P - A0.1 O Z m ZO �z C Cn m0 O� z --Iz OCn ZM ^ m l J 0 O TI mn -_-a >Z n D Z m 00 6 N CD N LID co PROPOSED RIGHT OF SO1 S02 WAY DEDICATION S 45° 32' 04 "E S22 '° N WATER MAIN - 8" PIPE -530� CONNECTING TO XISTING a 5 0, - EASEMENT REQ IRED ,a GALLERY I STRUCTURE � P 1.5 FIRE SPRINKLER — — RISER BUILD -TO -LINE I ROOM (STREET I ' I LEVEL ) UP s13 1 1 I u < W I� 1 ' �I < W 20' o^ < W S03 m _ I G w S05 W ART < C>w GALLERY o� S05 A w IN < I� 1 S10 m N < W 0 < W W F03 < < < < < ITI < < < < < ITI TRANSFORMER ROOM TRASH ROOM LE'AJ F o WATER ELEC. HEATER ROOM ROOMI L "J —IF---] ^I I \ LJ � �v (STREET a d° an d SZ4 -LEVEL I ° a ° I _ DN UP P 1 n D �I RAMP DOWN 70 z /o (STREET 14.39 SL. m LEVEL) -- SOA3 NVA SOA3 NVA ■ Ig FLOWER SHOP S15 y Na an m m ca zm �oco 0 Am z A w RAMP DOWN E 4 <.. mz Lit 1-1 a N4531'05"E p 150.11' = Property Line S09 I I I I I I A A N N m rn I r N DO Z oz cz Cn.. m0 O_1 =�0 0 z * Z r � W 0zm M0 n C� Dm IZ El I I I I — LIMIT OF SITTING ARE o OLD TOWN FRONT STREET \ REGISTRAfION \ r666Y x � I OFFICE .�. LUGGAGE L GAGE STORAGE y C LINTER PREP J PANTRY �r]HA Y I� STORAGE D GRAND BALLROOM MEN'S TOILET BANQUET LOUNGE ■ STORAGE S03 a LAUNDRY I II I � I D z RAMP DOWN I ' rn z 6.20% SL. z n m CART STATION 1�RA�li &LINEN _ CHUTE VESTIBULE 4 1 07 1 1 1 y y y y y W y ■ ■ S15 1 y y y y y y FAMILY v RESTAURANT y (STREET y y y LEVEL) 1 D 3 a _ 3p Z Cn 1 OUTDOOR SITTING AREA _ 7 ENTRANCE 35' - 0" 132.65' n LIMIT OF SITTING ARE LIMIT OF SITTING AREA o OUTDOO"ITTING °o AREA --M-71— I LIMIT C W IQ lil H c co I A IY 0 0 I N E- H 0 III 10'-0". El II III �Cb /4� AREA S06 TSUI S03 1 S03 Cn On m m S06 r OF SITTING AREA I S14 S16 OF SITTING AREA � SITE PLAN S16 S17 S20 S18 S16 A 316 - = 1'-0" S10 SITE LOCATION EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN 1ST STREET AND 2ND STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, MAP OF TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES STREET. APN(PA22-0035) 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -018, -020, -021, and -023 OCCUPANCY -1, S-2, B/M, A-2, A-3 R PROPOSED USE HOTEL (355 GUESTROOMS), RETAIL, RESTAURANT, SPA, PARKING ZONING OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION EXISTING LAND USE VACANTLOT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION TYPE I -A & TYPE II -A °da FIRE SPRINKLERS FULLY FIRE SPRINKLERED THROUGHOUT UTILITY PURVEYORS SANITARY SEWER EMWD POTABLE WATER RANCHO WATER ELECTRICITY SOCAL EDISON TELEPHONE FRONTIER LOT DATA TOTAL GROSS AREA: 93,523 SQFT 2.15 ACRES TOTAL NET AREA: 93,022 SQFT 2.14 ACRES TOTAL BLDG AREA: 292,806 SQFT FLOOR AREA RATIO(S): 3.13 LOT COVERAGE SQFT PERCENTAGE r N BUILDING AREA: 74,682 80% z Oz PARKING AREA: 0 0% z LANDSCAPING AREA: 0 0% � HARDSCAPE: 18,841 20% m0 O� Z --Iz OCn ZM m nn O TI mn _-a =r Oz m r O FLOOR AREA 7-LEVEL HOTEL 4-LEVEL PARKING LEVEL SQ.FT. LEVEL SQFT L7 46,808 L6 46, 808 L5 46,808 L4 46,808 L3 47,262 P3 39,477 L2 26,806 P2 46,347 L1 26,969 P1 47,405 B1 41,153 (R-1) TOTAL: 288,269 SQ.FT. (S-1) TOTAL: 174,382 SQ.FT TOTAL OF (R-1) & (S-1): 462,651 SQ.FT. MEETING SPACES SQFT GRAND BALLROOM (L1) 2,881 BANQUET LOUNGE (L1) 2,538 JUNIOR BALLROOM (L2) 2,312 MEETING ROOMS (L2) 776 TOTAL 8,507 SQ.FT. ** NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHICH THE PROJECT ACCOMODATES FOR CONFERENCE FACILITY SPACE: 8,507 SQ.FT. = 1,215 OCCUPANTS 7 SQ.FT. PER PERSON (OCCUPANCY LOAD FACTOR FOR ASSEMBLY USE) PARKING NO. OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES: 384 1 STALL PER GUEST ROOM X 355 GUEST ROOMS 355 1 STALL PER 300 SF OF MEETING SPACE x 8,507SF 29 TOTAL 384 NO. OF TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING SPACES: 385 LEVEL STD. STALL ACCESSIBLE TANDEM TOTAL P3 83 - 33 116 P2 70 - 21 91 P1 53 9 7 69 B1 80 - 29 109 TOTAL 286 9 90 385 * VALLET SERVICE IS PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES NO. OF REQUARED EV PARKING 137 (PER 2022 CALGREEN CIDE) -EV READY 73 -EV CAPABLE 24 -EV CHARGERS 40 NO. OF PROVIDED EV PARKING 137 LEVEL EV READY/CAPABLE EV CHARGERS EVCS TOTAL P3 49 0 49 P2 43 0 43 P1 5 40 45 B1 TOTAL 97 40 137 m MOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED NO. 7 D PROVIDED NO. 8 Cn BICYCLE PARKING SPACES 0 REQUIRED NO. 20 m PROVIDED NO. 24 STORIES LL LU z z SEVEN STORIES OVER 1 LEVEL BASEMENT (ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES IS 8 STORIES) BUILDING HEIGHT 91 FEET FROM LOWEST POINT (ALLOWABLE BLDG HEIGHT IS NO MORE THAN 100- PER OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN) KEYNOTES S01 GTE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATION. SEE ALTA SURVEY 4 - ALTA EASEMENTS FOR RECORD REFERENCE. S02 LAMAR MEDIA MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LOCATION. SEE ALTA SURVEY 4 - ALTA EASEMENTS FOR RECORD REFERENCE. S03 TREES TO BE IMPLANTED PER OLD TOWN STREET IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR DETAILS. SO4 DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY(DCDA) BY RANCHO WATER DISTRICT DWG #RW-20. S05 EXISTING POWERPOLE TO BE REMOVED. OVERHEAD LINE TO BE UNDERGROUNDED. S06 NEW STREET LIGHT PER OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN. SEE PHOTOMETRIC STUDY FOR DETAILS. S08 EXISTING BILLBOARD. S09 1-PHASE TRANSFORMER FOR RODEWAY INN S10 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS S13 NEW FIRE HYDRANT "SUPER" S14 NEW ROAD SURFACE PER CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARD DETAIL #104. PLEASE SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILS. S15 ADA ROUTE. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS FROM 1ST STREET AND 2ND ST. S16 EXISTING STREET LIGHT S17 EXISTING TEMECULA SIGN S18 EXISTING FLAGPOLE TO BE PROTECTED S19 PROPOSED DROP INLET STRUCTURE WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY TO CAPTURE CLATRANS DRAINAGE S20 EXISTING TREEWELL S21 KNOX BOX S22 PROTECTION BOLLARDS S24 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED S25 IRRIGATION WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTOR S26 PROPOSED SCREEN WALL S27 STORM DRAIN BASIN S28 PROPOSED DROP INLET IN RIBBON GUTTER S29 FIRE WATER DCDA & FDC S30 DOMESTIC WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTOR ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. SITE PLAN SCALE: As indicated P—A1.1 ONESTOP 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 10000, ' LO LO ao (y) N N O N LO N PROPERTY LINE ' I I - BASEMENT PLAN - PARKING LEVEL 131 SCALE 1 /16" = 1'-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' N REF. N 64' ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. B1 LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P-A2.1 C'7 C'7 6 N 66 N CD CV LO N L00001- PROPERTY LINE _ Gift _ AbIll v'v JJ PEDESTRIAN - MAIN ENTRY ENTRY PROPERTY LINE SECOND STREET FIRST STREET GALLERY STRUCTURE - SEE B ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS I \ P --A5.1 PROPERTY LINE GALLERY STRUCTURE - SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS PROPERTY LINE E P = A5.1 r COVERED CANOPY ABOVE ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. GROUND FLOOR PLAN (L1/P1) SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P - A 2.2 ►101 = 0 0 Ln 66 CV O CV N 7— II BELSTAIR 2 OPEOW-444�uP DN 90? ?0? �0? �0? �0? �0?90? 901? 901? 90? 901? 90? 901? 901? FULL MENU RESTAURANT (MIN 30 PEOPLE SERVING o?O �0? OFo ' BUTLER PANTRY ' e HALLWAY EL=1022.83' STD IR-5 EV-P EI EV-S m L�V-P2 \ TOILE // � m uuuL_ i VESTIBULE WOMAN'S ' SERVIC ELEVATO LU TOILET ' VESTIBUL ELEV-P w ELEV-P p F. - - - 1 . o' \j EL=1022.83 � TOILET_ © MEN'STOILET VESTIBUL / WATER HEATER ROOM 0 < P 2 \ / " F.F. 1019.00' OPEN TWBELOW \ / TRASH L _ - J / \ Q 23 ROOM / \ \ / MEETING RM. ' r ' 77 F.F. 1019.00' r _ «2 J F / \ OPEN\TO BELOW MEETING RM. TRANSFORMER EV EV ROOM; / \ F.F.1019.00' / \ HT: 17'-6"CZ \ d2 EV EV STAIR #7 z ELEC. ROOM EV MEETING RM. / pN DN STORAGE EV EV i AD LIFT 2 'RA LINGS (TYP.) 1 2" DIA. 42" Ill. JUNIOR BALLROOM STAGE 0 STORAGE OUTDOOR DINING AREA BEAUTY SALON HALLWA GYM 0 0 YOGA 10' - 0". L STAFF STAFF ' , � SBREAKROOMTAFF c BATHROOM BATHROOM HALLWAY Q 1010'-0 0TTEA � COL �a TAIR1 O EI IN'S TOIL II _IHOT i MEN'S SPA SPA LOCKER LOUNGE SPA LOBBY HALLWAY SERVICE HE., STAFF EAKROOM LL PANTRY 1 I TREAT. ' TREAT. TREAT. TREAT. TREAT. IL TREAT. LU - Of I B SCRUB O STEJY C0 SCRUB I SAW I I I L J L J I WOMEN'S SPA I HOT SPA LOUNGE WOMEN'S I TOILET �i F 18.97' 7 2,. / SE E P I I I FIF IR o EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV ' I I � , P203 ' STAIR-4, DN RAMP DOWN RAMP UP UP I5.34% SL. 4.37% SL. I i 2ND FLOOR PLAN (L2/P2) - OVERALL A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 I A n - - F.F 1018.45' SCALE 1 /16 - 1 0n ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® MECH.DUCTS � 71 112" IA. 42" HI. P 1.5 RAILI GS (TYP.) F.F. 1013.50' I EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV EV I 26' - 4" PF.F. 1019.00' IRRIGATION WATER METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTERS RAMP DOWN I 5.34% SL. DN DOMESTIC WATER I ' METER & BACKFLOW PREVENTERS W/BOLLARDS O I DCDA & FDC FIRE CONNECTION W/ —]SPRINKLER BOLLARDS o RISER ROOM —F.F-1918.22Z 1 O KNOX BOX I _ ART GALLERY ' ' 29' - 7" F2,5801SF 0 / I OPEN TO BELOW UNDERN PTO ON THE PEN T® BELO ' o \ STREET LEVELS I/ N I I m i 041 ' STAIR-6: GALLERY STRUCTURE -SEE I4ftb qft,,ID FLOOR PLANS LANDING WATER MAIN - 8" PIPE CONNECTING TO EXISTING - EASEMENT REQUIRED SECOND STREET 253 N REF. N ................. ............... i ''I I- 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 2ND FLOOR PLAN (L2/P2) SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P - A 2.3 ONESTOP N LINE OF I BLDG. N ABOVE REF. N I 64' ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. P3 LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P-A2.4 ONESTOP i 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I ►101 = 26'-4". (V N N N a cV / ADARM. 1 T1 KING T1 Q T1 KING 10'-5". v SUITE 3 T2 QUEEN T1 QUEEN ING T1 QUEEN T1 KING T1 QUEEN T2 QUEEN I n T1 QUEEN T1 QUEEN � T1 QUEEN T1 KING SUITE 1 DOG PARK Q ler / T1 KING Li I FL T-LI- 79 17E - El - - / LANDSCAPE AREA / CORRIDOR T2 QUEEN j� C. :D C. :D CI LEV-S1 LTV-P2 IR-5 SERVICE LEV. LOBBY B.O.H. LEVATOR - - - - - - PROPERTY LINE / T1 KING U I ,JESTIBULE ELEV-P3 LfV-P1 A/ i T2 QUEEN / T2 QUEEN T1 ING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T1 KING T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN UITE 2 T2 QUEEN t / T1 KING ®� / JACU ur UNDER � � I SEPARA PERMIT I / T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN / RRIDO — — — — — — — — — — — O O O T2 QUEEN T1 KING a a O O O WEDDING GARDEN O T1 KING I T2 QUEEN I STORAG S WOMAN' _TOILET 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 SWIMMING POOL UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O a a a a 0 0 SWIMMING POOL o 0 0 AREA T1 KING II T2 QUEEN ' T1 KING ' T2 QUEEN ' T1 KING ' T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN / 7. T1 KING n T2 QUEEN L �= T1 KING n SUITE 7 ETD67�� O� SUITE 4 T1 KING II T1 QUEEN II T1 KING II T1 QUEEN j T1 KING T2 QUEEN II T1 KING I T2 QUEEN IL SUITE 6 SUITE 5 29'-7" PROPERTY LINE N CP DECK DECK DECK DECK DECK o ADA RM.2 DECK n I Q I 1 DECK T2 QUEEN � C� - - � DECK T1 KING I DECK T1 KING t I r T2 QUEEN Ej T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING 0 0 DECK ' 1 DECK I I DECK I I DECK I DECK I I 0 0 3RD FLOOR PLAN (PODIUM LEVEL) - L3 A SCALE 1 /16" = 1'-0" 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' N REF. N ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS i s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED i i 5-U4-2U23 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 3RD FLOOR PLAN (PODIUM LEVEL) (y) N N CD N L0 N 7- SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P - A 2.5 ONOTOP 0 0 0 (V ♦ ADA RM. 1 0 ' T1 KING °N UP T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN ' n STAIR 2 IT,SUITE 1 / SUITE 3 ' T1 KINGca ki h c I JI PROPERTY LINE a C I CORRIDOR T2 QUEEN C1 SERVICE m E Ev P D� C� 1 LECTRICA ESTIBUL - ROOM > 1 B.O.H. LU -j - - - T1 KING w _ ELEV�� P E�EV-P SUITE 2 11'-51/2" T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING 1T-31/4 CORRIDOR I Gil / 00 B T1 KING -f 7 T2 QUEEN I I I I T2 QUEEN -- T1 KING ' T1 KING T2 QUEEN I n / STORAGE I TAIR-3 1 T2QUEEN STORAGE LL T1 KING ADA RM.2 1 Ell 1 T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (4TH TO 7TH FLOOR - L4 TO L7) Ie`a� N 1 SCALE 1/16" = V-0" I 1 REF. N T1 KING T1 KING 1 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' L, 1 — I I I SUITE 7 T2 QUEEN I C T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T1 QUEENL0j T1 KING 26'-4" LTJ SUITE 4 I T2 QUEEN 1 CORRIDOR T1 KING 1 nn,, c D ti 1 L� i',i j11 rD Cl-1 D (I I `;III nLTJ 'J I - T2 QUEEN 1 T1 KING SUITE 5 T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T2 QUEEN T1 KING T2 QUEEN T1 KING SUITE 6 ADA RM. 3 mop MAI N c � o qua ►rel = rn (y) N N CD N L0 N 7- ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 -REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN (4TH TO 7TH FLOOR) SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P - A 2.6 ' TOP OF PARAPET 2'- 6" HI. F- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — %2% MI.DNN PROPERTY LINE L / I I I � TRASH CHUTE VENT CAP I I 2 HR. SEPARATION � 2'- 6" HI. PARA ET WALL I, LINEN CHUTE VENT CAP /F 2% IN 2 MI \�� \ -7 \ \� -HRFIRE D L. m 2-HRFIRE DN 2 Ste' RATED �o �>. RATED ELEVATOR ? 2 ELEVATOR ' SHAFT SHAFT y 2% MI 2S MIN SL.DN. 'DN. / I SOLAR PANELS I J I / I o SOLAR PANELS / I 77 I I I I I / I I — 2ooD IN D O SL. N. 1 ' I I I Z z N V1 S 4 2 HR. SEPARATION I 2 6" HI. PARAPET WALL OF PLAN - OVERALL I — — — — — — — J \ — — — —\ A SCALE 1 /16" = 1'-0" N Na � REF. N I � �I 17 o' 8' 16' 32' 64' \\\\\\\\\\\\ S�MIN NJ _zZ I N fq I 2MI SOLAR PANELS SL.DN. s I SL. N. w�Lv�- — R/D & O/F I O \ I IV IL — — — — — — — — - — Nro I� 2oo 2% MIN z r � SL.DN. DN ° SL. N. I ZZ N I IIII\ I Lam\ \ 1 — ' ,I TOP OF PARAPET — — 2'- 6' Loft OUTSIDE AIR VENT DUCT - SEE MECH.DWGS. FOR MORE INFO. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. ROOF FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" P - A 2.7 75 a rn IZI- N O N () 7- BUILDING ELEVATION @ FIRST STREET COLOR& FINISH MATERIALS CA SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR PLASTER FINISHES 2 COATS OF 1/2' THK. EXT. PLASTER 0/ 1 - LAYER 60 MIN. GRADED' 6LDG. PAPER & 1-LAYER TYVEK, FASTWALL 300-K, 3 COATS STUCCO ASSEMBLY WITH KRAK-SHIELD ACRYLIC BASE. SMOOTH FINISH (TYP) STUCCO MIX 6Y, 'LA HABR A' OR EQUAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FOUR FINISHES / COLOR SAMPLES ON SITE FOR ARCITECT'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLfCATION OF FINISH COAT. STUCCO COLORS & LIMESTONE W � �Z E1 STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH LU E2 E1 >- } SW 7005 PURE WHITE Of E2 STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH Z d SW 7010 WHITE DUCK ~ O E3 STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH TOP OF PARAPET SW 9108 DOUBLE LATTE O _ d 1097' - 1 O" E4 STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH � d� [a Eo q LIMESTONE PICARD JAUNE BRUSHED -- ROOFML,, EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS 1 OH7' - 1 O" BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOOR & WINDOW ........... c BY'-------= OR APPROVED EQUAL 0 Ff I v s I i IL I L f i lr-1 0 n ... c E I � re L7 1077' - 10" L6 1067' - 10" 4 nG7l _ 4 n" (SEE DOOR & WINDOW SCHEDULE) FOR MORE INFO.) .......... . BUILDING ELEVATION FRONT ST B SCALE 1 /16" = V-0" RE ET A 'm o ONESTOP Lu w FTERM. LL 0. Z ONESTOP DESIGN INC. Q a � 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 CD LOS ANGELES CA 90010 W _ C) W U Z W W W. U Q. LL ' Q' . LL i. = PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 i REVISIONS i s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 3. PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 f 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 i i i i i . r i i i i i . Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. ' BUILDING ELEVATIONS SCALE: As indicated i i. P-A3.1 SCALE 1/16" — 1-70" ... ... ... ... ... ... ....... ....... ....... E3 LU z LU 0 7771- .......... ....... ........ ...... . ... .... ... . ....... ........ 7- 1= T T T T I T[ I f-f T T I T 1F Tv T[ ir q ir 1F 1 Do, TT 75 0- Nt 0 CD nil US Il _ _, 11, lid 7 7.: MEN �F �T t, tw mvm! BUILDING ELEVATION @ INTE SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" .... COLOR & FINISH MATERIALS EXTERIOR PLASTER FINISHES 2 COATS OF 1/2'THK. EXT. PLASTER 0/ 1 - LAYER 60 MIN. GRADE'D'6LDG. PAPER & 1-LAYER TYVEK, FASTWALL 300-K, 3 COATS STUCCO ASSEMBLY WITH KRAK-SHIELD ACRYLIC BASE. SMOOTH FINISH (TYP) STUCCO MIX 6Y,..'LA HABRA'OR EQUAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FOUR FINISHES / COLOR SAMPLES ON SITE FOR ARCITECT'S APPROVAL PRIOR TO APPLICATION OF FINISH COAT. STUCCO COLORS & LIMESTONE FE71 STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH SW 7005 PURE WHITE STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH SW 7010 WHITE DUCK STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH SW 9108 DOUBLE LATTE STUCCO - 1: SMOOTH FINISH LIMESTONE PICARD JAUNE BRUSHED EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOOR & WINDOW BY'------ OR APPROVED EQUAL (SEE DOOR & WINDOWSCHEDULE) FOR MORE INFO. RSTATE 15 ... ... ... ... A........ U5 0:0 ONES TOP Lu FTLL EMLM 0. Lu. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. LU 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 CD < LOS ANGELES CA 90010 LU C) Uj C-3 ;z LU W. Q. (if !LL ... ....... PA22-0035 PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 3 PLANNING SUBMITTAL# S f 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5 04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 J. i. Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. BUILDING ELEVATIONS 3 SCALE: As indicated i. P - A 3.2 ...... 1 5.1 9 ZI I Z ' � J I J I TOP OF ROOF TOP OF PARR ET I 1096.83' TOP OF PARAPET. OL 1097' - 10" PANELS 1097' - 10" p TOP OF SOLAR PAN ROOF PARAPET O PARAPET STAIR#1 SHAFT ROOF ROOF OL 1087' - 10" o — ! — — — 0 1087' - 10" L7 c GUESTROOM RRIDO GUESTROOM i c L7 1077' - 10" o LU 0 1077' - 10" LU GUESTROOM GUESTROOM o RRIDO 16 F- I L6 . OgL 1067' - 10" F- 1067'- 10" . o � i c ... o GUESTROOM GUESTROOM , o L5 CORRIDO I L5 OgL 1057' - 10" Q I 1057' - 10" o o GUESTROOM RRIDO GUESTROOM I o L4 I L4 104.7' - 10" 1047' - 10 o , o b 0- 2 77/128 GUESTROOM GUESTROOM I o L3 RRIDO WEDDING GARDEN AREA L3 1037' - 10" 103T - 101, 10" CONCRETE II WALL W/ 1/2" LIMESTONE 3HR OCCUPANCY SEE STRUCT. LOUNGE & SEPARATION 0, DWGS. FOR 13" CONC.SLAB 10" CONCRETE WALL MORE INFO. PUB / SEE STRUCT. W/ 1/2" LIMESTONE LO RESTAURANT L2 LEVEL DWGS. FOR BOUTIQUE IDS ROCM SEE STRUCT. DWGS. L2 1 222. MORE INFO. HALLWAY STAGE FOR MORE INFO. L2 OIL 1022'- 10" I 1022, - 10 OCCUPANCY SEPARATION W .. .. 00 _ /13" CONC.SLAB .. .. . SEE STRUCT. FAMILY GRAND _ I L1 LEVEL RESTAURANT MOREINFOO. BALLROOM 00 STAGE 1006.56' ! 1006.91' SI51004. L1 @FRONT ST. L1 @ FRONT ST. 1004' - 2" I. f 111-I 1II I I I� - -i L-I L_I 1=1 11=1 I hI I I_I I I�I I I �I 11-! I I I I I� I� I 1 I I_ I I L�i I I III-1 i 1=1 I I I`NI �1 I I III I i I�I I ICI I �� I l �l1 I 11 -III . ,_-_ , i III=III 111=1 11 111 111=11�111=11 I 111 1 I 1=111-111-I 1 f 111-I � 1 1 I I 111 I I 1=1 I I -III 111 1 I I=I I I� I- 1004 2 -1-1 l-1 I=1-1 1=1-I 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 11=1-1-11-I II I I-1 I�-1 1=1 I� 11=1 1=1-1-1 1=1 1=1 1=1 -1-1=1-1=1-11 I-1 I-1 '-----III- i----' '.—• BUILDING SECTION (A�—S—IALE 111_ 1 /16 _ - 111 0 T P OF PARAPET 0 1097' - 10" 0 ROOF 1087' - 10" 0 0 L7. 1077' - 10" 0 O L6 0 1067' - 10" 0 L5 W 'T 1057' - 10" . elf o 1-- ... _' � ........... L4 z 1047' - 10" O U- o L3 1037' - 10" . — O in L2 1022' - 10" ib BO L1 @ FRONT ST. 1004' - 2". Q 75 0- r N N r N O N ( r B o ONESTOP Uj rosve 0 U.I. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. LU 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 CD LOS ANGELES CA 90010 LU C) w U Z LU w. w. U LL' i I i LU Z PA22-0035 & } PA22-0037 Z 0 U a REVISIONS 0 0 o PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 0 12-23-2022 C> Uj. PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 Ld 1-16-2023 . PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 REVISED N 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 00 5-26-2023 0 W Uj J N N X. U.I. 0 Uj i,.i co Z 0 a U J Z) d 0 W' Uj a W Ir LU r i,.i x x U_ x O LL w. J Q . Job Number C> w Drawn By 0 w Checked By F- U Cad No. LLi Ir LU J. J Q ' Z 0 BUILDING SECTIONS LL U W LL N l7 Q N Z LU SCALE: 1 /16" = 1'-0" w. x O LU Cn P -A4.1 1 17 ... ... w z - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ° w SOLAR PANELS _ —TOP OF PARAPET _ _ + TOP OF PARAPET a� TOP OF PARAPET OgL Z i 1097' - 10" J } o LU-__ _ co1091.58" o 1097 - 10 aj O 0 � N ROOF ,...I --i.. fi N ROOF 1087' - 10" 0 0 0 w 108T - 10" 0 � 0 0 i o L7 c - 0 0 0 0 0 - — O GUESTROOM - - ! — — L7 1077' - 101, 0 LU1077' - 10" 0 Of 0 Q 0 0 0 IX Of Ix Of IX of GUESTROOM.. c L6 f- 0 0 0 0 _ 0 _ 0 _ L6 1067' - 10' o - o 0 0 LU o 0 0 111 0 1067' - 101, ' H 0 0 0 Q 0 0 (n IX E I GUESTROOM ..... U) a . L5 H o 0 0 0 0 0 Of 0 o L5 1057'- 10" U) T .. 0 w 0 N 1057' - 10" I 0 0 � Q 0 � 0 Df o � � GUESTROOM c L4 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 -� - L4 1047' - 10" - - 0 Of IX Of ! 1047' - 10" 10'- 1 3/4' 0 0 o GUESTROOM o L3 i o 0 0 0 0 0 o I L3 {� ..1037' - 10„ F 1037'- 10" 1 11 � L C 10" CONC. WALL W/ - � 1/2" THK. PARKING P3 3HR OCCUPANCY LIMESTONE PANELS SEPARATION W/ 13" u u i P3 L 1o2s.00 . -... -- -...•.:. INFO 1028 CONC. SLAB SEE 3 STRUCT. DWGS. FOR THE L2 N _ PARKING P2 El E u u °' N 1022' - 1 P2 r `° 101s.95 ° — — i — — P2 1019' DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE - O" DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE 1 O FROM 1ST STREET FROM 2ND STREET 12" CONC. SLAB - SEE F.S.1009.89' PARKINGP1 - STRUCT DS. FOR THE F.S.010.9 6.65% 008.00' INFO ��— -----_- — ---- P1 0..— 1 _ 11E-4 P1 I loos' - o" N I I —III — III —III=- — 1 -1 ICI —III III=1 —1 =11 III=1 I I= 008' - 0" —I III— 1=III=1 =III IPARKING B1 III it l �l �1 I II—� I. III-1 I 998.00'—I I B1 � 1 I I =1 I _ � L.I LIB B1 - 998 0 —III_ —I I i- —1 11—I I[ —I I �� I I —III .. III I I I_I I f—III I I III I. I—III—III-1 I l—III I I III III I I I I III I I �I I I—� I I—III_III_I I I_I I I—, I I —III —III —I I I_I I I —I I: —III —I I i__I I I —I I I_l 1 I� 11=1 I —III III —I I �I I I III I III 111—III I III � I I III —III —I I I_I I I__I I i-; I;-: _. I I I- I— _III-1 I I —I I l—I I IJ —III—I I —III —III— I I —I I, —I I— I I-1—I I— I I —III I I I_.1,—III— I I —I I. —I — I I —III —III —I —I I —Ill —I —, — I I —III —III— I I—I11—I I —I I— I —III —I 1 I— I —III —III —III I I— I I —III —I —I I I_,1 �—III—III—III—III—III— — I I— I —I I— I —III �_I _I I • �I _. _ _ _ _ _ .. f 1 .. _. _ _ _ _I -I• I I_ - .__ _I _I I_I_ __ L_ __.• I• — __ I. I_I —I- - - —I — -- - —� — - 12"SHOTCRETE -- •� = � I �=1 -. I � -i __I _, I1_•_I __I I -1 I L- 1-� — .__l I I•- .�-: � I11- I III I I--1 11- 11— .— 1— _=1 — 1- :� 1-1 - _- I. � I .-•I 1.- 1- -• i— 1.- I:• _- .-11- .. I I' :.�I - 1-. I -.1 I__,11_____I I ICI .-111_- I Lei i I�•I I - I•... 1-:I 11- _— I I I L _•.III_ _ __ _ III 11 _ l _ III .III _ III III _ _ _ _ _- III III, III I, III I III I ! I III III III _ _ III _ _ _ III WALL -SEE SHORING =1=1 =1 1==1=1—. I —III—! 11=1=1=1=1—I .— I—III=1 l=1=1=1=I 1==1=1 I—III—III—III=1 I=III=1=1=1 l=1 —I ,—III—III=1=1=111=1=1=1=1=1 1==1=1=1=1=1 1==1=1—I—III—III=1 1= =1 I=1—I—III—III=1=1 --- — -i i 1= DWGS. FOR MORE 12" SHOTCRETE _ _ 1 - _ INFO WALL -SEE SHORING =III=� �— -III—III=I I l=III =1 1=1 I]=I 11=1 1=1 [ E=I 1=1 1=1 1=f [ I=1 1=1 [=111=1 1= =1 1 =1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=[ 11=1 1=1 f 1=1 1=1 1=III=1 1=1 f 1=1 1=1 1=1 I =1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=] ] 1=III=FIR =1 I I —I 11=1 11=1 1=i 1]=I 1=[ 1 f=III: 11=1 DWGS. FOR MORE INFO. Ic FOUNDATION - SEE STRUCT. DWGS. FOR MORE INFO. FOUNDATION -SEE LL BUILDING SECTION STRUCT. DWGS FOR MORE INFO. (:A) —SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" G.2 w Iz J I LU Iw 0 0- L7 1077' - 10" o � o L6 1067' - 10" 0 o I L5 1057' - 10" 0 L4 1047' - 10" 4' 11 1/ " 0 L3 � ! 1037' - 10" o � P3 I 1028' - 0" N I M ' N I P2 1019. - 0" CDF.S 12" STF P 1 - 12' 1008' - 0" F.S. 0 1oos. '_I� o I III B1 I- 998' - 0" i—i 12" SHOTCRETE WALL- SEE SHORING DWGS. FOR MORE INFO. 75 0- STRUCT DW GS.� FOR MORE INFO. 7 BUILDING SECTION SCALE 1 /16" = 1'-0" I I 1 1, L7 1077' - 10" 0 0 L6 1067' - 101, 0 0 L5 0 1057'- 10" L4 1047' - 10" 0 f01LET o L3 — 00 1037' - 101, N M _EVEL I? F.S. P2.5 9.38— 1023' - 6" 0 EVEL 1018.12' F.S. c P 1.5 1013' - 6" 0 EVEL c B0.5 1003' - 6" EVEL I- B 1.5 lil it 993' - 0" m... Q ........... 0 ONOTOP Uj OTMEW. w . 0. U.I. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. LU 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 a LOS ANGELES CA 90010 LU C> W U Z LU w. w. U LL a PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS s s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 3. PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 REVISED ) 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED > 5-26-2023 ) ) s j i . Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. ) BUILDING SECTIONS i ) i 3 SCALE: 1 /16" 1'70" i i. P -A4.2 V I Z LU x a I L3 1037' - I10'' EO cV I M I M P2.5 1023' -16" 0 0 P1.5 1013' - 6" 0 0 B0.5 FI 1003' - 6" 0 131.5 993' - 0" 75 0- 1 5.1 9 ui ... .......... I . �I TOP OF PARA ET 1097' - 10"— STAIR#1 SHAFT TOP OF PARAPET O ROOF Z 1087' - 10" O W a —CI o a GUES OOM GUESTROOM L7 RRIDO 1077' - 10" o c GUESTROOM GUESTROOM L6 Q RRIDO 1067' - 10" 0 GUEST OOM L5 � RRIDO GUESTROOM 1057' - 10" 0 b GUES OOM RRIDO GUESTROOM L4 — — — — — 1047' - 10" 10" CONCRETE WALL W/ 1/2" LIMESTONE; c SEE sTRucT. GUES OHM LG ESTROOM 0'- 2 25) DWGS. FOR RID L3 MORE INFO WEDDING GARDEN 1037' - 10" 3HR OCCUPANCY Wi SEPARATION W/ in 13 CONC SLAB SEE STRUCT. STAFF MEN'S SPA SCRUB RM. SE LU DWGS. FOR YOGA TREAT. THE T. WOMEN'S SPA L2 LU MORE INFO. BATHROOM DW( F11 W%_ 1022' - 10" U) (n SPA SLAB 30" DROP SEE STRUCT. DWGS.FOR FD NCSLAB MORE INFO RUCF.S. FAMIL RESTAURANT S. FOR 1006.67' INFO. 1 1005.48' HALLWAY #1 1004 - 2 = -I=—II—I=— III —I _ III—i I—III-1 I —III —III —I 1 �—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I ! I —III —III —I I—III=i I —III —I I [—III—III—III—III—III—I I IH -—III=i I I-111I-11 I-1-i=1=111=1=l 11=1=1=[ 1 1=1=1 f l=1=1=1 11- -1I� ICI i ICI ICI I � = I�1-1 1=1 I r=1Ti=i=I I= "'— .. __� r BUILDING SECTION SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" TOP OF PARAPET FOUNDATION - SEE STRUCT. DWGS. FOR MORE INFO 12.3 I TOP OF PARAPET I I I i ROOF 1087' - 10" o... ... 0 L7 i 0 1077' - 10" o L6 1067' - 10" 0 o L5.. 1057' - 10" L4 OgL 0 1047' - 10" 0 L3 1037' - 10 " .. . • 'T'_ I P3 OgL 1028' - 0" I" M P2 co 1019' - 0" 1008.02' P.1 0 1008' - 0" . . I:- o B1 I1 998' - 0" -I l-III- i Q o ONESTOP LU (if OTMEW. Lu . LL O Z ONESTOP DESIGN INC. � 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 a LOS ANGELES CA 90010 LU C) U Z LU LLI Lu. U LL Q. LL ..... ..... ) PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 i REVISIONS s s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 3. PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 REVISED 5-04-2023 ) PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 ) ) i s s . Job Number Drawn By Checked By i Cad No. BUILDING SECTIONS ) i SCALE: 1 /16" 1'70" i i. P - A 4.3 ^R I V .wiriix f milli, s�i� it 11 �I�ili �[ �li�I il III IIIIIII I II �. ii'illlllll IM M M M IMIN I ANN IN Ell MMMMMMMMM yM MEIM= 0 A IMME MINIS LIMIT OF SITTING AREA 50 q — L IjrII 7- a ELEVATION - GALLERY ON 1ST STREET SCALE 1/8" = V-0" FLOOR PLAN - GALLERY ON C SCALE 1 /8" = 1'-0" r � 1 1 ST STREET ELEVATION- MAIN ENTRANCE ON F N REF. N LIMIT OF SITTING AREA 9' ... U�L i 7, � - ` TT �7- T 1022' - 10" L1 @ FRONTS 1004' - 2" L3 1037' - 10" L1 @ FRONT STT- 1004' - 2" Y ��SCZE 1 /8" = V-0" � II I� FAMILY ' HALLWAY RESTAURANT 1 BANQUET LOUNGE F.F. 1104.16' ;o -- -- =I ICI / STAIR #1 III IIIII � o MAN ENTRY 91/ F.S 1003.95' T 3 /64" 4' - 7 6' _ 6 6' - 2 13/32" 4, _ 7" ao a, T-.6.29/32" 4, _ T' 15' _ 7., 4, 7,' T - 11 4' _ 7" 17' • 6 15/16" o 02 . 2 W", It'errW, L V Im I P 1-1-i -S — — — — - - - I — ___ — — — / 141'_ — — 1\ V__� % i —�IN,Imp _0„ 13,_0,� � �I 3 6„ W Z 35' _0, CANi.ABOVE 28' - 1 'X LIMIT OF SITTING'AREA.. LIMIT OF SITTING AREA LIMIT OF SITTING AREA LIMIT OF SITTING AREA FLOOR PLAN -FRONT STREET Z F SCALE 1 /8" = 1'- 0" RONT STREET L3 oL 1037' - 10" ZQPERTY VE L2 1022' - 10" -I ICI =1I ICI [ -I I II- 11=1 I- 1 L1 @ FRONT ST. =', 1004'- 2" LA SECTION - GALLERY ON 1 ST STREET SCALE 1 /8" = 1'-0" )ERTY L2 ....... 1022' - 10" zo &1'@FRONT ST. 11 =t 111=1 11 IT 111=I 11=1 tt111 1 �111=III=I I� I 111 I I I- 1004, - 2 I -I I I I�I I I -'I I I�l I i-:l I I=1 I I —I f]—III'-i I i—III—III— p�CTION-GALLERY ON FRONT STREET SCALE 1 /8" = V-0" I� L2 1022' - 10" N L1 @ FRONT iT.. 1004' -'2" .......... SECTION - MAIN G ENTRANCE ON FRONT STREET SCALE 1 /8" = 1'-0" PROJECT DESIGN OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN A: HEIGHT OF BULKHEAD 1' - 0" 3' MAX. B: HEIGHT OF DISPLAY WINDOW 8' - 0" 6' MIN. C: TOP OF DISPLAY WINDOW 12' - 0" 8' MIN.. D: FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT 16' - 011 12' MIN. E: WIDTH OF DISPLAY.WINDOW 5' - 61' 14' MAX. F: DEPTH OF RECESSED ENTRY 3' - 0" TO 6' - 0" 6' MAX. G` HEIGHT OF ARCADE 12 ' = 0" TO 16' - 0" 12' MIN. H: WIDTH BETWEEN COLUMNS 13' -0" & 14'-0" 14' MAX. I: HEIGHT OF CANOPY/AWNING 15' - 0" 8' MIN. J: WIDTH OF COVERED WALKWAY 9' - 4" TO 9' - 6" 8' MIN. K: COLUMN DIMENSIONS 24" BY 10" 10" MIN., 24" MAX. L: BALCONY HEIGHT 4' - 0" 30" MIN. M: CANOPY ENCROACHMENT 8' - 011 8' MAX. C6 z 0 ONOIVP Lu w MEOW. 0 Q ONESTOP DESIGN INC. LU 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 CD a LOS ANGELES CA 90010 W C) 0 W U z 0 w. w. U LL ..... i 1 i PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 s REVISIONS s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED > 5-26-2023 i i i. . Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. ENLARGED DETAILS- 1 STAND FRONT STREET 3 SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" P-A5.1. KI REF. N 75 0- SECOND STREET EXIT DOOR ELEVATION 1012'- 2 1/2" A SECTION IUN -RETAIL ON I SECOND ECOND STREET SCALE 1/8" = l'-O" PROJECT DESIGN OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN A: HEIGHT OF BULKHEAD if 3'MAX. B: HEIGHT OF DISPLAY WINDOW 81 6' MIN. C: TOP OF DISPLAY WINDOW 121-011 8'MIN. D: FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT 16' 12'MIN.. E: WIDTH OF DISPLAY WINDOW 51-611 14'MAX. F: DEPTH OF RECESSED ENTRY 31 011 TO 61 - 011 6' MAX. G: HEIGHT OF ARCADE..... 12'=.0" TO 16'- 0" 12'MIN H: WIDTH BETWEEN COLUMNS 121-511 14'MAX. 1: HEIGHT OF CANOPY/AWNING 151-01' 8'MIN. J: WIDTH OF COVERED WALKWAY 91-011 8'MIN. K: COLUMN DIMENSIONS 2' BY 12" 10" MIN., 24" MAX. L: BALCONY HEIGHT .41-011 30" MIN.. M: CANOPY ENCROACHMENT 81-011 8'MAX ONES TOP PTO I ML ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5 04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. ENLARGED DETAILS- 2ND STREET 3 SCALE: As indicated i. P - A 5.2 3/ Stucco - GALLERY VIEW OLD TOWN FRONT STREET & FIRST STREET PERSPECTIVE VIEW 0 0 � �. - �- rOT- 7-- -ON- GARAGE ENTRANCE +r- MAIN ENTRANCE a�d ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 One o7lmNil -Ti Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 3D RENDERINGS SCALE: P-A6.1 ■la GALLERY VIEW SECOND STREET PERSPECTIVE VIEW E.2 COLUM E.1 WINDOW TRIM 0 100-051A, d� OPEN PATIO Est _�,: W '. Wr IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII-MI F RETAIL & PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE VIEW Al ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 fV dl Ln fV 61 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 3D RENDERINGS SCALE: P - A 6.2 0 LO N N O N LO Lia MECHANICAL & TRASH ROOMS r� I I k Y " 'fi'?Wlr�' y;� yyA+1�•� wit �.+�6i��'• � � •,�'I.'` l� �� 1\. �.. " �.�� r�'e �y.. ;[� �y+dye'-•.. - �( _ .��1 , �� ,,+ ti' �; �,; ,� ` �•. • - /'�'- ' ��p;..f n •.��. ��•.I:��'. � ��,�� '"`Y'�(:' ��'E•}} ��riN rF- •�{• •��>}'�`��. �:: �.��' 1'•iiG�f''1i'�r"J „J.Y . J ti A -'r` •Z. .. r�tip ry1 S ... ' i + ¢ y .�.i �'�' phi �• '. +i71 I' S1. �. r i 5 is [ '� _fix - •.77j�1[ y.M1.i, at r� fr k��.1 1 1•fLL, P ems; . i � �.` '.,1•:?:4:� • �lj' lh ) IY�.Tr4� J• i . ' i r ] ;f. -^r �'hik^ C� n .K`: /.-i',��' • r �.fi .A"':fit �� {�. i •� i � � }[I.� :,'� ' 3 .� y �p � • :a+ 7�'. I' R ' ` : 1. {; ' r • �'`•� , i� S �' s� ., �] [ 4Y.�'.%r.' .r �1111� _ I _ L INTERSTATE 15 PERSPECTIVE VIEW STAIR TOWER ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 i i i i i i i i Job Number s Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 3D RENDERINGS SCALE: i P - A 6.3 0 N N 0 N 7— QUOIN ENLARGED DETAIL INTERSTATE 15 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 7 UTILTY ROOMS ENTRANCES ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS s PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED > 5-26-2023 i Job Number s Drawn By Checked By Cad No. 3D RENDERINGS SCALE: P - A 6.4 0 N N O N LO OLD TOWN FRONT STREET ELEVATION COLOR & MATERIALS ff, I , Uu"UU Ulm U U � _,�,UZX, -,K o- 4 � - - CORNICE DETAIL D•2 PEDIMENT MOTIF A.3 AV.?:i" r� ': .1 ,'� �.:.�1.'�ft E.2: COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS �F t'��"'f;smiit p .r :..� r• .�Y�Aif' it lr'! :, ��• _ _- �. SW 9108 DOUBLE LATTE E.1: COLOR - SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7005 PURE WHITE BELLY BAND A.1 E.3: COLOR - SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 7010 WHITE DUCK EA: LIMESTONE - PICARD JAUNE BRUSHED E.5: METAL BALCONY RAILING & METALCANOPY SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 2808 ROOKWOOD DARK BROWN l E.1 COLUMN FRONT STREET WINDOWS FRONT STREET MAIN ENTRANCE 'M I\ r .M .1/Trim EI == -01!--�- _ , _ - FRONT STREET RESTAURANT ENTRANCE ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. COLORS & MATERIALS SCALE: P-A7.1 I RETAIL ENTRANCE NMIa III [1 SECOND STREET ELEVATION ,ii ifi��iii GgifisGi�il i • •. ; .��lll..ass,.,•==•��7'��+11s�1 �� . SECOND STREET GARAGE ENTRANCE QUOIN ENLARGED DETAIL l'�1 -4,44�'174L ri NOTES: FOR FINISH LEGENDS, REFER TO P - A7.1 SHEET. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 fV dl Ln fV 61 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. COLORS & MATERIALS SCALE: P - A 7.2 010 ril N N O N 7— E.2/Stucco E.2 / Cornice E.3/Stucco E.2/Stucco Elm NO MEN -L E.1/Molding I - - iEff IfT rr; ve 1 - �'� IF i i ii i ioms E.1/Baluste _ OEM � �� `� ��: ii �i iW i Nr ii i�� s FIF w l .. m..m ■'1, .:�. x E.3/Molding - -Hit MMU- IV'z 1015, .001 �� , NMI ii WIN WIN iM e - -� E.1/ Stucco 1 ST STREET ELEVATION — - own e � A PEDIMENT & WINDOWS FRONT & FIRST STREETS BUILDING CORNER ENLARGED VIEW PEDIMENT ENLARGED VIEW NOTES: FOR FINISH LEGENDS, REFER TO P - A7.1 SHEET. ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 7 - REVISED 5-26-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. COLORS & MATERIALS SCALE: P - A 7.3 010 101 CY) N co N N M N 0 N 7t L0 ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH LOW VOLUME DRIPLINE IRRIGATION IN SHRUB AND 36" 6" GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BUBBLER IRRIGATION FOR ALL PROPOSED NEW TREES I ° TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2.13 ACRES / 93,022 SF P1.5 a. Q. LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED: W ST�j EET TREE W/TRE (STREET GRATE PLATANUS 8,086 SF PROVIDED 8.6% LANDSCAPE ACERIFbLIA'BLOOGO D' LEVEL A 1 ° MENA _ a a w o02 z_ a � O J _al a a_ (STREET LEVEL) I a a Figure Y--IS 0: Examples U _ of decorative \/ I �Q double posted lantern style a a light fixtures in old Lorin. SIDEWALK DECORATIVE POLE LIGHT (EXCEPT FROM o TEMECULA OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN) L I Pi I I i ' RAMP DOWN RAMP DOWN ' I 14.39%SL. (STREET LEVEL) 5.20%SL. I I El Ej I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �FFFFF�F�, I y R �c ? 0 L x,rs>,ss sssssss s ss>,s F �FFFFFF FFFFF FFFFF FFFFF FFFFFFt—Ft—F FFEI LJ 4 4 4 -4 -4 -4 -4 L-4-4 -4j � J F IF-� ❑ _ _ J J SECURITY itITCHEN VT. 107 219 L L � a OFFICE N I 1 KI a � LLTJ E� n PANTRY PREP �Q 121 TO o O 120 109 � z 1 u u LU �' LLI - 1 I--- GRAND BALLROOM co F1221' �' ( p Lty. N (ST E E Z y E L) L — W SERVING SERVING SERVING J y NEW STREET THE W/TREE GRATE PLATANUS y MILY ACERIFOLIA SL OGOOD' 1 NT i STORAGE y 126. y I PROPOSED COLD NADE LIMITS WIJ I � i i ZONING: OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN y LAND USE: DOWNTOWN CORE / HOTEL OVERLAY � I I I L 71111111 I I o� I I - I I I / ENTRANCE REET LIGHT 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' OLD TOWN FRONT STREET EXISTING STREET TREE PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA'BLOODGOOD' OLD TOWN TEMECULA GATEWAY ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 �PNDSCgPF �`�� JAL YUN 9P 9 �� y w ign tur c� L-LZS-LUL4� -02-16-202 F0. CAL\FOR �I N Ln N . 61 I�+�1 Q � u Q 66 J V� U w 2 w O � w LU DC W� z O SQLA INC Landscape Architects 380 N. PALM ST. SUITE B T. 562-905-0800 (Main) BREA, CA, 92821 F. 562-905-0880 la@sglainc.com www.sglainc.com T. 213-383-1788 (Studio) PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0" P — L 1.0 2'-3LOW PERENNIAL SHRUBS AND SUCCULENTS GROUNDCOVERS ' (TYP). ' 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 19 el It It CV N co CV O N LO LOW PLANTER WITH PERENNIAL FLOWERING SHRUBS AKIM CI 1(—(—I II Cf`IT4Z `� r�r��r��c�r� �i iTr%/-%/-%r3 cu�tei�r�c URF DOG PARK I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2022-03-02 TREES BOTANICAL/COMMON NAME CONT PF QTY REMARKS 0 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS'SPARTAN' / SPARTAN JUNIPER 15 GAL L 4 PHOENIX ROEBELENII / PIGMY DATE PALM MULTI -TRUNK 15 GAL L 40 LATANUS X ACERIFOLIA / LONDON PLANE TREE EXISTING M 1 PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA'BLOODGOOD' / BLOODGOOD LONDON PLANE TREE 24"BOX M 3 STREET TREE �SYAGRUS ROMANZOFFIANA / QUEEN PALM 36"BOX L 6 SHRUBS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT PF QTY REMARKS ALOE STRIATA / CORAL ALOE 5 GAL L 80 DIANELLA REVOLUTA'VARIEGATED' / VARIEGATED FLAX LILY 1 L 125 GAL `t MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS / PINK MUHLY GRASS 1 GAL M 37 PENNISETUM SETACEUM'RUBRUM' / PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASS 1 GAL M 98 PHORMIUM TENAX'BRONZE BABY' / BRONZE BABY NEW ZEALAND FLAX 5 GAL M 30 PUNICA GRANATUM'NANA' / DWARF POMEGRANATE 15 GAL M 22 ROSA FLORIBUNDA'ICEBERG' / ICEBERG ROSE 5 GAL M 40 SHRUB AREAS BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME CONT PF QTY HRUBS & GROUNDCOVERS 4,260 SF GAPANTHUS AFRICANUS'QUEEN ANNE' / QUEEN ANNE AFRICAN LILY 1 GAL M 293 SF NIGOZANTHOS X'BUSH BLAZE' / BUSH BLAZE KANGAROO PAW 1 GAL M 334 SF ARMERIA MARITIMA / SEA THRIFT 1 GAL M 257 SF COREOPSIS AURICULATA'NANA' / DWARF TICKSEED 1 GAL L 293 SF COREOPSIS LANCEOLATA / LANCELEAF TICKSEED 1 GAL L 293 SF DUDLEYA PULVERULENTA / CHALK LETTUCE 1 GAL VL 361 SF ECHEVERIA X'EVENING GLOW' / EVENING GLOW ECHEVERIA 1 GAL L 320 SF ECHEVERIA X'LIME N' CHILE' / LIME N' CHILE ECHEVERIA 1 GAL L 320 SF ECHEVERIA X'MORNING LIGHT' / MORNING LIGHT ECHEVERIA 1 GAL L 334 SF HEMEROCALLIS X'BETTY WOODS' / BETTY WOODS DAYLILY 1 GAL M 334 SF SEDUM SIEBOLDII 'ROSE GLOW' / ROSE GLOW SIEBOLD STONECROP 1 GAL L 334 SF SEDUM X'PURPLE EMPEROR' / PURPLE EMPEROR STONECROP 1 GAL L 334 SF TEUCRIUM CHAMAEDRYS 'PROSTRATUM' / PROSTRATE GERMANDER 1 GAL L 260 SF NOTE: 1. 3"DEPTH OF BARK MULCH REQUIRED UNDER ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 1 112" DEPTH OF BARK MULCH CAN BE USED UNDER GROUNDCOVER FROM FLATS. 2. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5' AWAY FROM WATER METER, GAS METER, OR SEWER LATERALS: A MINIMUM OF 10' AWAY FROM UTILITY POLES; A MINIMUM OF 8' AWAY FROM FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS. 3. SEE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN (POTTED PLANTS) FOR POTTED PLANTS. CITY OF TEMECULA REQUIRED FIELD OPERATION: A MINIMUM OF THREE INSPECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED PER CONSTRUCTION PHASING. THE FIRST IS AN IRRIGATION INSPECTION TO VERIFY PIPE DEPTHS AND IRRIGATION MATERIAL CONFORMANCE. THE SECOND IS A LANDSCAPE INSPECTION TO VERIFY IRRIGATION COVERAGE AND OPERATION, AND TO VERIFY THAT ALL PLANTINGS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THE THIRD IS A FINAL INSPECTION ONCE MUCH HAS BEEN LAID AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE IN PLACE. CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SCHEDULE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONS. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH LOW VOLUME DRIPLINE IRRIGATION IN SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BUBBLER IRRIGATION FOR ALL PROPOSED NEW TREES TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2.13 ACRES / 93,022 SF LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED: 8,086 SF PROVIDED - 8.6% LANDSCAPE \A 0' 8' 16' 32' 64' ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 \�P\JDSCAPF 9 gn tur n LL -O-LVL4� ��qT2-1 6- FOP CAL 4 M a U w w SQLA INC Landscape Architects 1380 N. PALM ST. SUITE B T. 562-905-0800 (Main) BREA, CA, 92821 F. 562-905-0880 la@sglainc.com www.sglainc.com T. 213-383-1788 (Studio) PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 5 - REVISED 12-23-2022 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 1-16-2023 PLANNING SUBMITTAL # 6 - REVISED 5-04-2023 Job Number Drawn By Checked By Cad No. LANDSCAPE PLAN L 3 SCALE: 1 If = 20'-0" P-L 1.1 �3 4 5 6 E G] C L co Ln W Ln Z) U C O C C co N 0 0 L co CL U) 06 0 rn m c� U N E m c E U H 0 0 L 20 Q � oU M N O = t0 N 0)O L N � T--U Li'telines Ahoumc nu GaI+11$Irauan 4 CSrr/arinn f7c�ido Old Town Series Comanent Saedfications casl cuppoin Cahlt (teed ShAl be IIIIellaaam. Lick rtla krone as i Mue[d wI[h (.t cGunhru sled aeactl1w uxw t >v le iuq p m Xmx� .Uumtaum Aen&cfar E phi ,a I ednad� ,r,,n W) da wauwa *Iehcw u-bk- ye 6Y erlw am OEM L rubnlar 5nppora :krm 3b.0 bk. u_ • u d. w irk uIICIW IN_'o durast €r tnu.e++c1s it blades LILL= M Clear Pahrarhonsttr Lense 'Shull br assuula. welts nuniurrm.I ;s wam I%�Lxas Saro4hwe CZIms Refractor IA40 be a-auura mI dfc utuabod bd1au41anp pmnibiy nm ej&y to*mmal Mid senfilar. SIIIIraald aawkb4l1Iln pauam, Type 3 sy-_ M -.' (Tzar tqui-n RLlt L12%-1 A}AW T►pc 3 *gw9=itd lTw tqurt ar_er_ 12%-51ij Msrjul bast Lamp uAnIsk IIt 10ILru 175 wwn. MA plreaure>w hUtll Lama bi]-'C And nuwurp Vapor. IFUL. tA%Ied" Porretain Srarhrt 2b411 he l+ulte IauA rteiaul tn.s %I& 1 Plu t.ucwIhrn And uLwulL%3 to the wellu ad rul [mPlagr J.Y caibhl. "UL Listed" Randal Scald be pro-N wtd wah gGkI rkcaj I. d dbumn ,I and nuunle.! [at dIc Idle-IfBr h�dr:IGi��i�>telldYa}' lac nuYadS.4J1 ala.1 idf4ki411. Cast ?i umlalum 110ddl A Flnilh All +fie lad c+ rhRn It: clawed plesaraleal And Maras 1lwuo5 • IOF . Aho•nrulii7 potycm`.' pu Lhdrs adonis at harm t&nW&shin l=,:,_,.. tee [9afaa► i_t�ri■� Lumumiete . _ Jun br =r !•scar• to JLuxL%&_t u Id. '11 s.adua k1'7-' 30.1 IMM hmumt is rcrlr� liiuriliutielrt M'r'Il11lili [amµ �'s}Ilt 1VlaunYny �'ulul l7allulkill Optiori4 s T Iri so 1 ' r!♦I+�h PIS5 rL Ham ddde Shield Yblrr�t HL'5 t20 F :min 1A0 t3Z * Prh3n� aARM z Polished Brews Arms OTT nu a4D �` *' 9L7 BK = l5fam =1JP : PcPhshad $razz Cupcsola 5 Tel7slf PAH 27T 3 = triple a so WH + vllrli- PCaPholocecfl elr+l iCAl 1TS C�7 51 lq+--a 12c, SF=SPOCIZIl LAMP =L xW rastamed 4 - qu:Ld R fir, ElranVr OTT- 5.50-HPS440-2-5P-LAMP Special Color = RAL7012 Litelines,_ �?IMKafkirRr,- • hlemkm, CA 925W 951,V1.&5e2 buta61QVrd5.s_ Lifftelines w L itelin es. - Did Town Series S o e c ific a rio ns La-tnailt '1 asrerm srvled 'eatis¢br' ramarrmcsed from darab.a cast aLnmiunm h odp. mflLdad :eam[esa cis:C p ol3csxbaaata laasa. Loracilirtto =:arc _auarrar _ b:Ilaslad sax (;) :I}- 8P5 .amp sad Lsalas fa- -aa:Sarp-aaf opsrar'sam. ('_) pa: pGIs. M cc inc 3I lirgh pa•rar facroz, L W.A baLLatc in alocrrlce: campanean fir■ -UL Lit cod". fncro:y ]Ira•T•ired emd mauntad ra a 7amo••ab4 asrambi, w quirk-c:scemmarc alacr ra. pia: iI. standard to carp =,;!a33m;101L dad fiat-73c;at. Lake }' cgaaro robv]ar %;a*L chad: is r1ad n-i.h ran0 radar -STK'. $au dotasl fie cans-.nrrad irbm rdagit radar -51T-. d 3' x it'haad hold is atamdard. Mal3aAll la irom n-ashOTT, add ]a: boita ara LrerLie C Lpa Cad 1 S - O.C. Arm Tka 0 TT arm it cam- -imcIDd from cast sae aa:aadad slnmsnnm to farad a arardy ac comb lti far ('-) it:misaisac mnaztad fir 's S0 .daffraa4- Tk* azm its saznbly scull Lila fir a gets maunTod cam on dad s.ntl] ba sacvrrd br zrlal-rrai Inrunars. La- colarr sad Piat:b Ail=faras axe claenait sad pre-Isaatad afar fabAC17rea to amccra prep or paimr adhaLtoa- A dwmacai palyascar T.a� ds- coimaI a 0*mocrztiCtHy appltad red bakad _d far:m s durabt. EMAIL - Fate Fias•k hl3 sap9 sad �roed matmben shall rwraiss (2) coats of ;00'. ec.i-hc statz . C aacuLr ftctor7 fa- ratarsaloradn. faaxia&Sad sisal ramperonrc shall bo prima paim.ad a InI"t =ad- inckareee 5ea;A4A anrLuiago is (4) 5/4' x IS' a-�c!v: toIm fw tnlralbtiera law ao snginaered conrrara foo=g (by e%k4ac). flpciaas %FaakaC onilst(L), 3 aaaar arm:. Brea'. fiiIa(L) C an••aaCaaca 0MC1e14, far ssuanaL dacara.sdrLc. f ansvlt :a:rorr for erhar apriaas. 27K-41{ei<er PW - hlenRee, CA 92504 951�1}7 9S12 1�X951-3D7�;5S$ 0.0 b;o b.0 b.o b.o b.o b.0 b.0 b.0 b.0 6.0 b.❑ La 6.8 b.0 Lo V.a b.o b.o L.0 b.o b.0 b.❑ :0.0 b-0 b.0 0.0 6.0 b.o 6.0 0.1 b.0 -0 1 0.1 0.2 b.2 G.3 6.4 0.4 0.5 6.s 0..A bA 0.3 -0.3 0.: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.❑nI❑;0n 0.-0T 0.0 0. 00.0 ❑.0 9�tl, 0.❑N❑. 0T 0-0 �0.0 b.a 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 U.❑ 4.0 .0.0 0.0 m 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.t 6,1 0.i 0.1 b-1 b•2 0:2 0.2 0,3 0.3 4.3 0.3 a.3 0.2 ❑.2 o SHE b.d h.o b.o o.a b.a o.o b�e•+xrA••+a.oa aupoN,oF?.u'O `h,d $ 'u.b o.o u,a a.0 b.o 'Le b.n 9.0 P.9 b,n o.o b�:#71�) o.r h-I b.i u,e u.i o,z b.z u.2 h.x 6.z a.a o.z o.2 e•. b.❑ b,a b.o b.o b n.a 0.0 o�Oflb.lb.1 U.1 z 6-1 b.h ur TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 APN: 922-07-NEW FIXTURE TYPE: FX01 MANUFACTURER: LITELINES MODEL: OTT-5-50-M H-277-2-BK-HSS-PC MOUNTING HEIGHT: 161-011 WATTAGE: 50W LUMENS: 4000 LUMENS LLF:.8 0 60 120 I Feet 1DXX- 9U ZA0%#4 7A#A0 S14FETY REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESSIBILITY ONLY APPROVED BY_' CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS ACC ❑ DATE BENCH MARK SCALE SEAL: Designed BY Drawn By Checked By RECOMMENDED BY: DATE. ACCEPTED BY: DATE.' PATRICK ]NOMAS, P.E. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. No. 44223 �+ y `•�r OF rMMACCUL4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Drowin9 No. Contractor Inspector Date Completed MARK S. MARK S VALUE CS '4 Yor'zontaf Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of ❑QtE' R. C. E. No. T LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRONT ST- TEMECULA, CA 92592 vertical Sheet 1 of 2 ONESTOP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVE #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PROPRIETARY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT INCORPORATES PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF ONE STOP - DESIGN. ANY PARTY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT DOES SO IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONE STOP DESIGN. COPYRIGHT ONE STOP DESIGN 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONTRACTOR NOTICE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPENCIES WITH THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 /05/21 ISSUE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED PROJECT NUMBER DATE SHEET NAME PROJECT ARCHITECT T.B.D OSD-21-02 10/15/21 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - STREET SHEET NUMBER Pi 00 E 7 C B A 2 3 4 5 0 2 4 5 6 E O a) W Co U m E a) H c a) U O 0 N 2 o Q i oU 4 -0 M a) O � Co N to O L z� �U Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement 5 A2 SINGLE -M 71 38 Al SINGLE Calculation Summary Label B1_Floor Total Lamp Lumens LLF Description N.A. 0.850 Barron 11 TLED-SC-24-VS-G N.A. 0.850 Barron 11 TLED-SC-64-VS-G CaleType Illuminance Units Avg Max Min AvglMir Fc 5.83 10.4 1.0 5.83 Jobname Temecula Resort & Spa (Parking Garage-B1)_2021-10-14.AG1 Report for: Andrew Crane Report by: Ismael Avina-Prieto 1 Applications Engineer Mounting Ht.: See Drawing See Luminaire Schedule for Light Loss Factor - Unless otherwise specified by customer Reflectance. 20/20/20 - Unless otherwise specified by customer ❑ate:10114/2021 ------ Disclaimer ------ Luminaire data is obtained according to IES procedures under controlled laboratory conditions. Field results may differ from computer predictions due to many uncontrollable factors including, but not limited to Line Voltage Variations, Lamp Performance, Ballast input watts, LED Drivers input watts, Temperature Variations and Jobsite Conditions. 2 i Max/Min 3 10.40 1.1 1.7 2.2 2-6 2.7 2-2.2 -1:8�1.6 1.8 2.2 2.6 2.8 2.9 18 2.7 2.6 2.7 2.8 2-8 2.7 2 1-0 1-8 2.8 3.5 4.0 4.O 3.7 3.3 2.8 2-4 2.7 3-3 3.8 4-2 4.3 4.2 4.1 4-1 4A 4.2 4-2 4-0 3 1.5 2A 4.3 5.3 5.9 &.0 5.6 4-7 3.8 3.4 3.8 4.6 5-5 6A 6.3 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.3 6.0 5 2.3 4.5 5.8 6.9 7.3 7.3 7.0 6.0 4.7 4.3 4.6 5.8 7.0 7.4 7.6 7.7 ' .A 7.2 7.6 7.7 7.6 7.5 7 4.3 5.6 6.6 7.5 8.3 8.5 7.5 6.6 5.3 4.8 5.2 6.5 7.5 6.6 8.8 8.4 8.3 8.1 8.4 8.5 9.0 8.4 7. ° Al ° Al ° Al �.3►J4.4 4.9 5.8 6.8 7.7 8.4 MH: &75 6.7 5A 4.9 5.3 6.6 7.7 6.7 8.5 8.2 8.6 8.6 9.1M[:�w�a.f&' MH: 8.75 1.1 4A 4.9 5.6 6.4 7.5 7.9 T 9 7.5 6.4 5.2 4.7 5.1 6.3 7.5 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.8 8.2 8.4 8.3 8.1 7. I•.3 4A 4.7 5.3 5.9 6.7 7.4 7.5 6.9 5.9 4.9 4.4 4.8 5.8 6.9 7.7 7.8 7.6 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 7.8 7.5 6. 3.9 4.5 44.4 4.8-- 5.6 6.3 6.8 6.9 6.4 5.7 4.7 -4.1 4.6 5.6 6.4 7.1 7.3 7`2- 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 6.9 6. fl � 5.5MF�,:$ 7&0 6-9 6.7 6.1 5-4 4-8 4.4 43 5.5 6.4 7.1 7-2 6,6 5.7 4,8 4.2 4.7 5.7 6.7 744 7.6 7.3 7,1 7-2 7.1 7.4 7.6 7.2 6. ,I.4-3 I 4-3 5-6 7-0 8-3 8-7 B.2 7.6 6.5 5-3 4-7 4-9 5-8 7-1 7.7 7.8 7.4 6.3 5A 4.7 5.1 6-2 7-4 8.6 8.2 8.1 7-8 7.7 7-9 8-2 8.2 7-9 7. 2.9 4.1 5.6 7.3 S.7 9 A 8.9 8.1 T2 5.7 5.0 5.2 6-3 7.5 8.2 8.3 7.8 6.9 5.5 5.1 5.4 6-8 7.8 8.5 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.3 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.5 7. i / 2.1 3.3 4.9 6.7 8.1 9.0 09A1 8.3 7.3 5.9 5.2 5.3 6.5 7.6 8.7 AQ 7.9 7.0 5.7 5.2 5.6 6.9 7.9 9.2p A1.3 8.8 8.8 8.5 8.8 8.9 9.6A1'8.9 7. MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 1.3 1.8 2.7 4.1 5.8 7.5 8.3 B.6 B.1 7.1 5.8 5.0 5.2 6.3 7.5 8.2 8.3 7A 6.9 5.5 5.1 5.4 6.8 7.9 6.5 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.2 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.5 7. 1.5 1.8 2.5 3.7 5.1 6.6 7.7 7.9 7.6 6.6 5.4 4.7 4.8 5.8 7.0 7.7 7.8 7.4 6.3 5.1 4.7 5.0 6.2 7.4 6.0 8.2 8.1 7.8 7.7 7.9 8.2 8.2 7.9 7. 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.6 3.5 4.7 5.9 6.9 7.2 6.9 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.4 6.3 7.1 7.2 5.7 5.8 4.9 . 4.3 4.8 5.7 6.7 7.4 7.6 743 7.1 7.2 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.2 6. 4.5 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.1 3.6 4.8 5.8 6.6 7.0 6.6 5.9 5.0 4.2 4.4 5.3 6.2 6.8 6.9 6.5 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.7 6.5 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.0 7,0 7.0 7.2 7.2 6.9 6. I 6.4 6.1 5.4 4.5 4.0 4.1 5.1 6.2 7.2 7.6 7.2 6.2 5.2 4.5 4.7 5-6 6.7 7.5 7.6 7.1 6.0 5.0 4.5 4.9 6.0 7.0 7.8 8.0 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.8 7.9 7.6 6. i •7.8 7.8 7.4 6-7 5-5 4.7 4-7 5-6 7-0 7.8 8-0 7,8 6.9 5.6 5-0 5.5, 6.�,, 7-4 8.4 8.0 7.7 6.7 5.4 4-9 5.3 6-6 7-7 8-3 8.5 8-5 8.2 8.0 8-3 8.5 8-4 8-2 7. 8.3 8.9 8.2 7.3 6A 5-1 5-0 6.0 7.3 8.2 8.9 8.1 7.2 5.9 5.2 5-3 6-5 7.6 8-6 'BA 7.9 7.0 5.7 5.2 5.5 6.9 7.9 9.0 9.1 8.8 8.7 8.5 8.8 8.9 9-3 8.7 8. Al ° Al ° Al ° Al ° Al 7.5 8.3 9.OM .$ 7tg.4 6.2 5.2 5.1 6.0 7-3 S.1 8MH;8�757.2 5.9 5.2 5-3 6.5 7.6 8.5 ��{; � 6-9 5.6 5.2 5.5 6.9 7.9 8.9 $ § 8.7 8.4 8.8 8.8 9.3M .�.7�, / 6.8 &0 8.2 8.0 T2 5.8 4.9 4.9 5.6 7.0 7.8 8.0 ' .A 6.9 5.6 4.9 5.0 1&0 7.4 7.9 8.0 7.7 6.6 5.3 4.9 5.2 6.5 7.7 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.1 8.0 8.3 8.5 8.3 8.2 7. 5.6 6.6 7.6 8.0 7.6 6.6- 5.4 4.6 4.5 5.2 6' 7.2 7.6 T2 6.2 5.1 4.5 4.1�_ 5.5 6.6 7.4 7.5 7.0 6,0 4.9 r4.5 4.9 5.8 7.0 7.7 7.9 7'� 7A 7.4 7'A 7.7 7.9 7.6 6. 6.1 7.2 7.7 7.7 7.1 6.2 5.2 4.3 4.2 5.0 5.9 6.6 6.9 6.5 5.9 4.9 4.2 4.4 5.3 6.1 6.8 6.9 6.4 5.7 4.7 4.1 4.6 5.6 6.5 7.1 7.3 7.1 7.0 6.9 7.0 7.1 7.2 6.9 6. ' 5-4 6.6 7.9 8.6 8.3 7.6 6.4 5.3 4.4 4.3 5.1 6.0 6.9 7.2 6.8 5.9 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.3 6.3 7.1 7.2 6.6 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.7 6.7 7A 7.6 7.3 T1 7.1 7.1 7.4 7.6 7.2 6. . . . . . . . /4.6 5.8 7.3 8.6 9.5 9.2 8A . 7.2 . 5.7 . 4.8 . 4.7 . 5A . 6.7 . 7.5 . . . 7.7 7.5 6.5 . 5.3 . 4.7 . 4.8 . 5.7 . 6.9 . . 7.6 7.7 . 7.3 . 6.2 . 5.1 . 4.6 . 5.0 . 6.1 . 7.3 . . 7.9 8.2 . 8.0 . T7 . 7.6 . 7.8 . 8.1 . . 8.1 7.9 . 7. 0 3.7 4-8 49 8.3 9.7 9.9 8.9 7.7 6.1 5.0 4.9 5.8 7.1 8.0 8.3 7.8 7,fl 5.6 4.9 5.0 6.1 7.4 8.1 8.2 7.7 6.7 5.4 4.9 5.3 6.6 7-7 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.1 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.3 7. MH: 8.75 • Al 9.3 7.7 6.3 5-1 5-0 5.9 7.1 8.0 89A1 7.9 7.0 5.7 4-9 5-1 6-2 7-3 8.4 0 )%1 7.7 6-7 5-4 5.0 5-3 6-6 7-7 10 A1-1 8.5 8.5 8-3 8-6 8.6 y.4A1 8.6 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 8A 8.0 T2 5.7 4.7 4.7 5.5 &.8 Y5 7.8 7.4 6.7 5.3 4.6 4.7 5.8 7.0 7.6 7.7 7.3 6.4 5.1 4.6 5.0 6.3 7.4 8-0 8.2 8.2 7.9 7.7 8.1 8.1 8-2 7.9 7. 6A 6.8 6.0 4.7 4.0 3.9 4.6 5.7 &.5 6.7 6.5 5.6 4A 3.9 4.0 4-8 6.D &.6 6.7 6.3 5.3 4.3 3.9 4.3 5.2 6-4 7.0 7A 7.0 6.7 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.0 6.9 6.� 4.9 4.8 4.3 3.6 3.0 2.9 3.5 4.1 4.7 4.9 4.6 4A 3A 2.9 3.0 3.6 4.3 4.8 4.9 4.5 3.9 3A 2.9 3A 4.1 4.8 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.1 5A 5.0 5A 5.2 4.9 41 2.9 3.0 2.7 2.3 1.9 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.6 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.0 2A 2.5 2.1 2.1 2.4 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.6 3A 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 21 1.3-. *1.3. *1_3 1.5. *1.7 =-.T T3 4��7 �-T..6- '1.4. 1:2 _ 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 2� 2.4 2.2 20 1.9 1.9 1.7 1. 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.2 2A 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.7 2. 2.3 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.7 2.1 2.3 2.3 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.8 *2. 1 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.1 2.8 2A 1.9 1.5 1.2 '4.O 4.0 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.6 2A 2.8 3.3 3.7 4.0 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.9 3. t 3.8 4.0 3.7 3.4 2.8 2.4 2.5 3.1 3.5 3.9 4.0 3.7 3.2 2.8 2.5 2.9 3.5 4.0 4.3 4.2 3.8 3.2 2.3 •1.5 1.0 5.5 6-1 6.0 5-4 4-4 3-7 3-4 3-9 4.8 5-6 6-0 5-8 5-1 4.2 3-5 3-5 4-1 5-1 5-8 6.0 5.7 4-9 4-0 3-5 3.6 4-3 5-2 5-9 6-0 5.5 4.7 3-9 3.5 3.9 4-7 5-6 6-1 6-1 5-4 4-2 2-9 1-7 7.2 7A 7.3 6A 5.6 4.5 4.3 4.7 6.1 7.0 T2 7.2 6.5 5-2 4.4 4.3 5.1 6.4 7.1 7.3 7.1 6.2 4.9 4.3 4A 5A 6.7 7.2 7.2 7.0 6.0 4.7 .4.3 4.7 5.9 6.9 7.3 7,2 6.7 5.1 3.4 2.0 1,0 7.9 8.7 8.3 7.3 6.3 5.0 4.8 5A 6.7 7.7 8.5 7.9 7.1 5.9 4-9 4.8 5.7 7.p 7.9 8.6 7.7 6.8 5.5 4-8 4.9 6.1 7.2 S.2 8.4 7.5 6.6 5.3 4.8 5.2 6.5 7.5 8.4 8.2 7.2 5.7 3.6 2.1 1.0 ° Al ° Al a Al ° Al o Al B.O 8.8 I $,tJ� 6.4 5.2 4.9 5.5 6.9 7.8 8.6]j� .� 75.2 6.0 5.0 4.9 5.9 7-1 B.O 8Mj-j;7 3]�7.0 5.7 4.9 5.0 6.2 7.4 8.2 �7 8.7 5.4 4.9 5.3 6.5 7.6 8.4 MB $ ]§ 7.8 8.0 7.9 7.3 6.1 4.9 4.7 5.2 6.6 7.6 7.8 7.7 7.0 5.7 4.8 4.7 5.6 6.9 7.7 7.8 7.7 6.8 5.4 4.7 4.9 5.9 7.2 7.8 7.9 7.5 6.4 5.2 4.7 5.1 6.2 7.4 _589B 7.5 -S:TA1 R-3 6.9 7.5 7.4 6.6 5.5 4.7 4.4 4.9 5.9 7.0 7.4 7.2 6.4 5.3 4.5 4.4 5.1 6.2 7.2 7.5 7A 6.1 5.0 4.4 4.6 5.4 6.5 7.3 7.4 6.9 5.8 4.9 4.3 4.8 5.7 6.9 7.6 7.6 6.7 6.3 6.8 6.7 6.2 5.4 4.4 4.1 4.8 5.7 6A 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.1 4.2 4.1 5.0 5.9 6.6 6.8 6.5 5.8 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.2 6.0 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.6 4.7 4.0 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.3 7.8 7.8 6.2 5,0 4.6 3.7 °,$A�2, 6.6 7.2 7.1 6A 5.5 4.6 4.2 4.8 5.8 6.7 7.2 7.0 6.1 5.2 4.3 4.3 5.0 6.. 6.9 7.2 6.8 5.9 5.0 4.2 4.4 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.2 6.6 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.6 6.7 7.6 8.1 8.2 7.4 5.7 I�t I: kt5 7.5 7.8 7.7 7.2 5.9 4.9 4.6 5.1 6.4 7.4 7.7 7.6 6.8 5.5 4.7 4.6 5.4 6.6 7.5 *7.77.5 6.5 5.2 4.6 *4.85.7 6-9 7.6 7.7 7.3 6.2 5.1 4.6 5.0 6.2 7.3 8.1 8.6 8.8 7.$ 6.3 4.7 3.8 8-1 8.5 8.3 7.7 6-5 5.2 5-0 5.5 6.9 7-8 8.3 8.0 7.3 5.9 5.0 4-9 5.8 71 8.0 8.3 7.8 7A 5-6 4.9 5.0 6-1 7A 8.1 8.2 7.7 6.8 5.4 4.9 5.3 6.6 7-8 8.6 8.9 8.7 7.9 6.2 4.7 3.5 8.2 9.F pq.9 7.7 6.6 5.4 5A 5.6 7-0 7.9 FOA18.3 7.2 6.0 50 5.0 5.9 7.2 8.1 �A1 8.0 7.0 5.7 54 5-1 6.3 7.4 8.5 47 7.8 6.8 5.5 15-0 5.4 6.$ 7.$ 9.i' Aa.2 8.3 7.2 5.5 4.0 2.7 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 7.9 8A 8.2 7.6 6.5 5.2 5.D 5.3 &.7 7.6 8.1 7.8 7.0 5.6 4.6 4.6 5.5 6.9 i 7.7 8.2 7.7 6.8 5A 4.7 4.7 5.9 7.2 7.9 8.1 7.6 6.5 5.1 4.8 5.2 6.6 7.7 8.3 8.3 7.8 164 4.6 3.1 2.0 7.3 7.8 7.7 7.1 5.9 4.9 4.6 4. 4.6 5.6 E.0 5.8 4,,9 3.8 3.3 3.3 3.9 4,8 5.8 6.2 6.D 5.1 4_0 3.3 3.3- 4.0 5.5 6.1 &2 5_8 4.8 3.7 .5 4.9 6.0 7I.2 7.7 7.7 7.0 5.5 3.9 2.5 1.5 ,�� L S T 1R.4 6.4 7.1 7.1 5.4- _- 5.5 4.5 3.7 2.6 2 2 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.4 2A 1.9 2.6 4.1 5.5 6.5 7.1 7.0 6.2 5.D 3.5 2.1 1.3 6.2 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.4 4.2 3.3 3.2 3.6 3.9 4.fl 3.9 3.5 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.9 3A 3.8 4.0 3.8 3.3 2.8 2.4 2.5 3.0 3.5 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.4 3.1 3.2 4.1 5.2 6.2 6.8 6.7 5.9 4.8 3.3 2.0 1,2_ 7.1 8.0 8.0 7.0 5.7 4.5 4.0 4.2 5.0 5.7 6.0 5.8 5.1 4.2 3.5 3.5 4.1 5.0 5.7 6.0 5.7 4.9 4.0 3.4 3.6 4.3 5.2 5.9 6.0 5.6 4.8 4.1 3.9 4.5 5.6 6.7 7.3 7.3 6A 5.0 3.5 2.1 1.2 5.9 p7� 8.8 9.5 9.7 8.8 7.8 6.2 4.9 4.fi 5.D 162 7.1 7.3 7.2 6.6 5.2 4.4 4.3 5.1 6.3 7.1 7.3 7.1 6.2 4.9 4.3 4.4 5A 6.6 7.2 7.3 7.0 6.0 4.9 4.5 4.9 6.2 7.4 7.8 7.7 7.9 5.5 3.7 2.2 1.2= H:• • n 6-4 7� 917510.1 10.4 9-4 8,0 6.7 5.3 5.D 5.5 V8 7.7 8.6 8,0 7.1 5-9 4-9 4.8 5.8 7b 7-9 8.6 7.7 6.9 5-6 4.8 5-n 6.1 7.2 8.2 8.5 7.6 6.7 5.4 4-9 5.3 6.6 7.6 8-6 8.4 7.3 15.9 3.9 2.4 1.2 El El �Al �� Al Al 5-6 7.0 8.9 9-8 10.1 MK 049 6,7 5.3 5.0 5.6 7-0 7.8 8.7M1�;6.7$.3 6 0 5.4 5.0 5.8 7-2 8.0 8MH;7&757.0 5.7 4.9 5-1 6-2 7.4 8.3 MH. 675 6.8 5A 5-0 5-4 6.6 7,6 8.5 Nk $,�5 5-9 3.9 2-3 1-2 4.9 6.2 7.9 8.9 8.9 8A 7.6 6.3 5.0 4.8 5.3 6-6 7.6 7.9 7.8 7.1 5.7 4.9 4.8 5.5 6.9 7.7 7.9 7.7 6.8 56A 'r;4i7 4.9 5.9 7.2 7.8 7.9 7.5 6.4 5.2 4.8 5.1 6.3 7.4 7.8 77 7.1 5.5 3.7 2.2 1.2 3.6 4.9 6.3 7.5 8.D 7.7 6.8 5.7 4.7 4A 5.0 6.0 7.0 7.5 7.2 6.4 5.3 4.5 4.5 5.1 6.2 7.2 7.5 7.1 6.1 5.0 4.4 4.6 5.4 6.5 7.3 7A 6.9 5.9 4.9 4.3 4.7 5.6 6.7 7.3 722 5.4 4.9 3.4 2.0 1.1 2.8 4A 5.5 6.5 7.0 6.9 6.3 5.4 4.5 4.1 4.8 5.7 6.5 6A 6.7 6.0 5.1 4.2 4.2 5.0 5.9 6.6 6.9 6.5 5.8 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.9 6.4 5.6 4.6 4.0 4.5 5.4 6.2 6.7 6.6 5.9 4.8 3.2 1.9 11 2.5 3.8 5.2 6A 7.1 7.1 6.4 5.4 4.6 422 4.8 5.8 6.7 7.2 7.0 6.1 5.2 4.3 4.3 5.1 6.1 6.9 7.2 6.8 5.9 5.0 4.2 4.4 5.3 6.3 7.0 7.2 6.6 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.6 5.5 6.4 7.0 6.9 6.1 4.8 3.3 1.9 1.1 2.6 3.9 5.5 7.0 7.6 7.6 7.0 5.8 4.8 4.6 5.1 6.3 7.4 7.7 7.6 6.8 5.6 4.7 4.6 5.4 6.6 7.5 7.7 7.5 6.5 5.2 4.6 4.8 5.7 6.9 7.6 7.7 7.3 6.2 5.0 4.6 4.9 6.0 7.1 7.6 7.5 6.8 5.2 3.6 2.1 1.1 1 2.7 4.1 6.0 7.4 8.1 8,0 7.5 6A 5.1 4.9 5.4 6.9 7.8 8.2 8,0 7.3 6.0 5.0 4.9 5.$ 7.2 7.9 8.2 7.8 7.0 5.7 4.9 5.1 6.2 7.4 8.1 8.2 7.7 6.8 5A 4.9 5.3 6.5 7.6 8.1 7.9 7'2 5.7 3.8 2.3 1.2 2.8 4-1 6-1 7.4 8-9 AN 7-5 6-4 5.2 5-0 5-6 6.9 7-9 1'DA18-4 7-3 6.1 5.1 5-1 5-9 722 8-2 'W 8.0 7-1 5-8 5.0 5.1 6-3 7-4 8.5 o Al 7.8 6.8 5-5 5.0 5A 6.6 7-6 8ti -Aq-6 7.3 5.9 3-9 2-3 1.2 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 2.6 3.9 5-8 7.2 7.8 7.9 7.3 6.1 4-9 4.6 5-2 6-6 7.5 8.0 7.8 7-1 5.8 4.7 4.7 5-6 7.0 7-7 8.1 7.7 6.8 5-4 4-7 4-8 5-9 7.2 7-8 8.0 7.5 6.5 5.2 4.8 5.1 6-4 7.5 8.0 8.4 7.2 5.7 3.8 2.3 1.2 2-1 3.4 4.9 6.3 7,0 7-0 6.5 5.3 4.2 4.4 4.5 5.7 6.7 7.2 7.4 6-1 4.9 4-1 4-0 4-7 1&0 7-0 7.2 6.8 5-8 4-6 4.0 4-2 5-1 6.4 7.1 7.2 6.7 5.6 4.5 4.2 4.7 5-8 7.0 7.5 Y4 6.7 5.2 3.5 2-1 1,1 4 3A 3A 4.2 5-3 6-2 6A &.8 6.0 4A 3.3 1.9 1.1 1.8 2.8 3.9 5.1 6.1 6.6 6.5 5.8 4.7 3.2 1.9 1.1 1A 2.3 3.9 5.3 6.5 7.3 7.2 6.3 4.9 3.4 2.0 1.1 1.2 2.3 3.9 5.8 7.2 7.7 7.7 7.1 5.5 3.6 2.1 1.1 1.2 2.4 4.0 6.1 7.5 8.6 8.4 7.3 5.8 3.8 2.2 1.1 Al 1 A 2.3 3.9 6.0 7.5 8.6 N -!? 8,75 5.8 3.7 2.1 1_d 1.0 2.1 &.7 5-7 7-3 7-9 7-9 7-2 5.4 3.5 1.9.. 6 DESIGN ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVE #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PROPRIETARY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT INCORPORATES PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF ONE STOP - DESIGN. ANY PARTY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT DOES SO IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONE STOP DESIGN. COPYRIGHT ONE STOP DESIGN 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONTRACTOR NOTICE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPENCIES WITH THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11/05/21 ISSUE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE PROJECT ARCHITECT AS INDICATED T.B.D PROJECT NUMBER DATE SHEET NAME OSD-21-02 10/15/21 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - GARAGE 131 SHEET NUMBER P 10 1 E 0 C B A C ch W LO D U C O n 06 O m cU U N E N r.+ C N E L) U A O L O a x Q fn - oU M N N O = U) CU O L n (1) c a U .L O 4 5 6 E u C C'7 1n W 1n U C O CI C 3 N O O .3 ca I C1 06 V- O m c� U N E N H c U O 0 �o 0 x Q i - Lf) :3 N T--U NT a� M N N O U) Co +� CV n^ C)L LL U .L 0 Luminaire Schedule Symbol oty Label El 61 Al , 1 6 A2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Pl_Floor Illuminance Arrangement Total Lamp Lumens LLF Description SINGLE N.A. 0.850 Barron !I TLED-SC-64-VS-G SINGLE N.A. 0.850 Barron !! TLED-SC-24-VS-G Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min Fc 8.94 53.4 1.0 1 8.94 53.40 Jobname Temecula Resort & Spa {Parking Garage-P1}_2021-10-14.AGI Report for: Andrew Crane Report by: Ismael Avina-Prieto / Applications Engineer Mounting Ht.: See Drawing See Luminaire Schedule for Light Loss Factor - Unless otherwise specified by customer Reflectance: 20/20120 - Unless otherwise specified by customer Date:10/1412021 ------Disclaimer------ Luminaire data is obtained according to IES procedures under controlled laboratory conditions. Field results may differ from computer predictions due to many uncontrollable factors including, but not limited to Line Voltage Variations, Lamp Performance, Ballast input watts, LED Drivers input watts, Temperature Variations and Jobsite Conditions. N 3 PARKING ENTRY 1.6 2.4 3.3 4.4 6.1 8A 11.5 15.6 20.3 242 28.1 31.0 33.2 33.5 31.3 28.5 2&8 19.8 15.0 90.1 6.4 3.9 2, *0 Al El�41 U1A1• 2A 3.0 4.2 5-7 7.7 10.4 13.8 18.5 23.4 28.3 3306170.�9-3 � 33MH28110. J2-5 17.0 11.6 7.4 4.4 2. STAIR - 12-0 16-0 21.1 26,7 32,3 38,3 42-2 45-2 45-7 42-fi 38.5 32.1 25,4 19,1 12,9 8,3 5.0 3. Al. El El ElAl 3.2 5-3 6-6 8.0 9-9 13-2 17-5 23-3 29A 35.5 42MH1�-F 6170.j9-9 I1ft 42 fh1 f35 fb. j7.9 20-8 14A 9.0 5A 3. 4.7 6.0 7.2 8.4 •10,% •14.5 •18.6 24.6 31.0 37.4 44.4 49.1 52.5 53.0 49.5 44.7 372 29.3 22.0 14.8 9.4 5.6 3. a Al ° Al. ° Al ° Al. MECH RM o A 4.0AZ4.5 5.1 6.3 7.6 8.7 11.1 �: 11f�.5 24.9 31.2 37.7 44��}g fo.�3,0 1�� 45MH37�•�9.6 22.0 14.9 .i9`�3 5.6 3.15 STAI R-7 MH: 10.5 I L� 3.6 T3.8 4.2 4.7 5.4 6A 7.6 .8.9 10.9 •14.1 18.5 24,3 30.3 36.6 43.4 48.0 51.3 51.8 48.6 43.8 36.4 28.7 21.4 14.5 9.2 5.5 3. ` Al • Al � Al 3.8 4.2 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.8 6.51 7.5 6.9 10.8 13.8 17.6 22.9 28.5 34.2 40 fAW4177,#8.0 of 1tp.� 40M1134jb 7.0 20.1 13.6 8.7 5.2 3. 4.4 4:8 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.5 6.0 6.6 7.4 8.5 '10.4 13.0 16.4 20.9 26.0 31.2 36.5 40.3 43.1 43.8 40.9 31.1 31.0 24.5 18.3 12.4 7.9 4.8 3. c A2 I.i ElAl.a'Al o Al. 4.1 4,9MH;fi10,53 6.5 6A 6.2 6.0 5.9 6.1 6.5 7.2 8.4 10.0 12.2 15.0 •18,7 22.8 2-7.331 MFp5fb, 7.9 MW 1 .1 32MH27-fb.61.4 16A 10.9 7.0 4.3 2, 4A 5-0 6.0 6.9 7.2 7.0 &8 6.5 6,1- 6.-0 6.4 7.1 92 9A 11.2 11-5 16.4 19;6 210 26.6 29.7 31.7 31.9 30.2 27.4 23.0 18.3 13.6 9.3 6.0 3.8 2. 3.2 4-1 5.1 6-3 7.0 7.3 744 6-9 6-6 6.3 6.1 6-4 7-0 7-8 8.9 10-3 11.8 •14-0 16A 18.8 21.6 24-1 25-5 25-9 24-7 22-1 •18.9 15.1 11 A LAU ND RAY 2 2.9 3.9 510 6:1 6.8 73 7A1 7-6 6.5 fi.4 .1 6A •6:s - 7:5 6.6 c At 10A tl7 1-344 15.O 17.0 18.7 19-7 20-4Al9-6 '17A 15.0 12.0 $ 9 64 U P P L Y 2 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 12tr 2.2 2.7 3.6 4.6 5-8 6-6 6.9 '7.26-9 6.6 6.3 6-0 6-2 6.8 7.3 7.9 8-6 9.2 1b.1 1b.8 11.7 13A 142 14.9 15.1 •14-6 13.4 11.6 9.4 7.2 52 3.7 2-7 2. 2.5 2.9 3.6 4.5 5.5 6A 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.7 6.2 6.0 6.2 6.6 7.3 7.7 BA 8.5 8.7 8.9 9.3 10.0 10.9 11,6 117 11.4 10.6 9.2 7.6 6.0 4.Peq j3.tr .8 2. 3.1 3.2 3.4 3.9 4.7 5.4 662 6.7 7.0 6.8 6.5 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.5 7.0 7.5 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.9 8.3 8.7 9.2 9.4 9.3 &6-- 7.6 6.6 5.4 4..3�1` 1�LL CC 3.0 2. �4.4 4.2 4.1 4.1 4.5 5.0 5.6 6.1 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.4 6.2 6.1 6.2 6.4 6.9 7.3 7.5 7 4 7.1 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.5 7.9 8.2 8.1 7.5 6.8 6.1 5.2 4.2 3.5 3.1 2, 5.3 5.3 5.1 4,9 4.9 5.2 5.7 6.3 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.6 6.1 5.9 6.0 6A 7.0 7.2 7.3 7.3 7.0 6.6 6A 6.6 7.0 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.2 6.5 5.7 5.0 4.1 3.5 32 2. 5.9 6.1 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.3 5.4 5.9 6.3 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 6.8 7.D 7.1 7.0 6.8 6A 6.1 6A 6.7 7.0 7.1 7.0 6.8 6.3 5.6 4.8 4.0 3.5 O3 2. 3'-Olt ��i 6.5 �9 6.5 6.D 5.9 5.6 5.fi 6.0 6.3 6.7 72 6.7 6A 6.2 5.9 6.0 6.4 6.6 7.2 7.3 6.8 6.6 6A 6.0 6.3 6.5 6.8 7-1 72 6.5 6.1 5.5 4.7 4.0 3.4 3 H' 2 Al ° Al ° Al Al 6-2 6.6 7A MW810.3.3 6,11 5-7 5-7 6-1 6-3 6-7 7MH:6U.5 6.4 6-2 5-8 6-0 6-4 6-5 7.0 MH: t%5 6-5 6.2 5.9 6-2 6-5 6-6 7.1 Mf�3 1 %5 6.0 5-2 4.6 3-9 3-2 2-9 2- 6A 6A 6.9 6-8 6.6 6A 5.7 5.7 6-0 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.7 6A 6.1 5.8 5-9 6.2 6.7 B.B 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.0 5.8 &0 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.7 6A 5.9 5.0 4.3 3-8 3.2 2.$ 21 6.¢ 6.8 7.3 7.3 7A 6 7 6.1 5.8 5.7 6-0 6.5 6.8 6.9 6-8 5.4 6,D 5.8 5. 6-1 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.4 6.0 (_6.9 5.9 6.3 6.7 6-9 $.8 6 5] 5,8 5.0 4.1 3.4 3.0 2.7 2. 6.3 7.0 7.6 7.6 7.2 6.6 6.1 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.2 6.7 6.8 6.6 16.2 6.0 5.9 5.9 6.0 6.4 fi.8 6.9 6.6 62 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.1 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.2 5.6 5.0 4.1 3.3 2.9 2.6 2. 5A 6.3 7.3 7.8 7.9 7.4 6.8 6.2 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.3 6.7 6.8 6.7 6.3 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.5 6.8 6.9 6.7 6.3 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.1 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.3 5.7 5.0 4.2 3.5 3.1 2.7 2, 4.1 5.3 6.5 7.3 7.8 7.9 7.5 6.9 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.9 6.4 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.3 5.9 5.6 5.7 6.0 6.5 6.6 6.7 6.6 6.3 5.8 5.6 5.8 6.1 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.3 5.7 4.9 4.3 3.6 3.1 2Y 2. 0 2.6 3.6 6 1 7.3 8.0 7.4 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.3 6.1 5.8 5.5 5.6 B.0 6.2 6.5 5.6 6.3 6.1 5.8 5.5 5.7 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.5 6.1 5.7 5.D 4.3 3.6 3.1 2.8 2, I�fi: 1 d.5 7.3A17.2 6.4 6.0 5.5 5.4 5.7 5.8 6.3 96A1 6.2 5.8 5.6 5.3 5A 5.7 5.9 6.5 1�11 6.1 5.8 5.7 5.3 5.6 5.8 6.Q 6.7 A�.6 5.9 5.5 4.9 4.3 3.5 3.1 aA2 2. 5. MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 1 .5 5.9 6.0 5.7 5.5 5.1 5.0 5.3 5.5 5-7 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.2 4.9 5.0 5.3 5.6 6.8 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.2 4.9 5-2 5-5 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.6 5.3 4.6 4.0 3A 2.9 2.7 2, 5-1 5.2 5.1 4.6 4A 4.3 4.6 6.0 5.1 5.1 5-1 4.9 4.5 4.4 4.4 4.7 5.0 5.1 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.6 4A 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.1 4.7 4.1 3.7 3.1 2.7 2-4 2. 4A 4A 4.0 3.7 3-6 3.6 3-7 3.9 4.2 43 4.2 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.2 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.9 4-2 4.5 4.7 4.6 4A 3.9 15 3-1 2-7 2.3 2A 1- 2-9 2-9 2-8 2.7 2-6 2-6 2.7 2.8 3.0 3-1 3.0 2-9 2.8 2-7 2-7 2-8 2-9 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.9 2-8 3.0 3-4 3.6 3-8 3.9 3-8 3.6 3-3 2-9 2-4 2-0 1-8 1-6 •1 3.1 3.A 3.5 3.6 3.5 313- 2.9 2A 1.9 1.5 1.2 •1.0 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2A 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.6 3.3 2.9 2A 1.8 1.3 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.7 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.5 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.6 3.9 4.D 3.9 3.6 3A 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.8 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.4 4.3 3.9 3.3 2.7 1.9 1.2 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.4 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.6 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.7 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.8 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.7 5.1 5.1 5.0 4.7 3.9 3.0 2.1 1.3 5A 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.9 4.7 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.5 5A 5.1 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.4 5,0 4.7 4.q 5.2 5.4 5.6 5,5 5.5 5.4 5A 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.5 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.4 3.2 2.2 1.4 5.9 6.' 6A 5.8 5.6 5.4 5.1 5.5 5.7 6.0 �5 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.2 5.2 5.5 5.7 6.1 U6,6 6.0 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.6 5.8 16.3 6.5 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.4 5.7 5.9 6.t 6.3 5.5 4.6 3.4 2.3 1.4 Al Al Al 0 Al Al 6-2 6.8 NH 1%5 5,9 5.6 5.4 5.7 6.0 6.2 6-7M1t410.'5.0 5.8 5A 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.3 6MH`dW.56.0 5.7 5A 15,5 5-8 6.0 6.5 MH: %5 6.0 5.7 5A 5.6 5.9 6.1 6.5 MU 1oi5 6-3 6-5 6-5 6-3 6.0 5-6 5-4 5-7 6-1 6-4 6.5 6-5 6.3 5-9 5-5 5-5 5.8 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-4 6-2 5-8 5-4 5-5 5.9 6-3 6-5 6.5 6A 6.1 5-7 5-5 5-7 6-0 6-4 6-4 6A 6-1 STAIR-3 6A 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.0 5.7 5.6 5.7 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.7 6A 5.9 5.6 5.6 5-8 6.3 6.6 6.7 6,6 6.3 5.8 5.6 5.6 5-9 6.4 6.7 6.7 6:6 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.7 6.0 191 601, 65 6A 6.2 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.0 5.9 5.8 5.8 6.1 6.5 6.7 6.6 62 5.9 5.8 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.6 B.8 6.5 6.1 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.9 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.1 53 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.3 6.6 6.5 5.9 4.3 2.3 1.5 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.5 6A 5.8 5.7 9,8 6.2 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.3 5A 5.7 5.6 5.9 6.3 6.7 '57 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.6 6.2 5A 5.7 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.6 6.5 6.0 5.0 2.9 1.8 1.1 6.5 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.2 5.7 5.6 5.8 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 134 5.9 9,5 5.5 5.9 6.3 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.3 5.8 5.5 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.2 5.8 5.6 5.7 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.4 6.0 5.1 3.7 2.2 1.4 6.5 6.9 6.8 6.4 62 5.9 5.5 5.9 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.5 5.1. 5.9 5.5 5.5 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.3 5.1 5.8 5.5 5.6 5.9 6.2 6.6 6.6 6.3 6.1 5.9. 5.5 5.8 6.1 6.4 6.7 6.5 5A 5.1 3.9 2.6 1.6 6.5 7. p Al.1 6-4 6.2 5.9 5.fi 5.8 6.0 6.3 6 9A16.5 5.9 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.7 5.9 6.4 47►A1 6.3 5.9 5.7 5.3 5.4 5.8 6.Q 6.6 0 471 6.2 5.9 5.8 5.5 5.8 6.1 6.4 7.0 A'1,8 5.8 5.1 4.0 2.8 1.7 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.2 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.0 5.7 5.3 5.0 4.9 5A 5.7 6.0 6.2 6.0 5.7 5A 4.9 5.1 5A 5.8 6.1 6.2 5.9 5.6 5A 5.2 5.7 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.4 5.9 5.2 4.0 2.8 1.8 0,-Of, 6-6 6.7 6.7 .6.6 6.2 5.8 5.6 4. 3,9 -%.2 4.3 !1 5 35 34 3 3t8 r4 ,5- -4.4 3, 35 •34��.4.2 4.5 4,5 4A %0- _3,6X 0 5.7 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.2 5.2 4.0 2-8 1-9 S F- 6-4 6-7 6.7 6-4 6A 5.8 5A 3-6 2.8 2-8 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2-4 2A 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.9 2-8 2-7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2-6 2.8 2-9 3.0 2.9 2.8 3.0 3-9 5A 6-0 6-6 6-8 6.6 6A 5-2 4-1 2-9 1.9 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.1 5.5 4.7 4A 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.6 3A 3A 3.4 3-4 3,6 3.9 4.0 3-9 3.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 3-6 3.8 4.1 4.2 4A 4.0 •4.3 4.8 5.3 5,9 6.5 6-$ 6.7 6,1 5.3 4.2 3.0 2.0 6.7 7.2 7.3 7.0 6.2 5.4 5.0 4.8 4.9 5.0 5.6 5.0 4.8 4.4 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.7 4.9 5.0 5.6 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.6 5.0 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.0 5.3 5.6 6.2 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.4 5.4 4.2 3.1 2.1 4.92 7.0 7.6 8.0 7.6 6.9 6.3 5.6 5.2 5.4 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.4 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.5 5.2 4.9 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.1 6.6 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.4 5.6 4.4 3.2 2.2 IIIH:.1�.5. 5.1 6. 7.8 6.8 6.3 5.8 5.5 5.8 5.8 6.1 C�6 5.3 5.8 5.6 5.3 5.3 5.6 5.8 6.2 M6.7 6.1 5.8 5.7 5.4 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.90 7.2 6.7 6.6 6.5 •6.4 6.7 7.0 7.3 7.; 7.6 6.6 5.9 4.7 3.4 2.4 Al Al Al Al Al 5.2 6.1 7.1 7.7 8.1 MIC 1M5 6.4 5.9 5.6 5.9 6.1 6.3 6.8MW510.5.0 5.9 5.5 5.5 5.9 6.0 6.4 Ira MH:6'W 56.1 5.9 5.7 5.9 6.3 6.6 7.2 MH: 1M5 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.6 7.9 6.1 8A MHI 1m5 6A 5.0 3.7 2.6 4.8 5.8 6.9 7.5 7.5 7.2 6.8 6.3 5.8 5.6 5.8 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.3 5.9 5.5 5.5 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.4 6.0 5.8 5.9 6.5 7.1 7.5 7.9 8.2 8.4 8A 8.6 9.1 9.6 9.8 9.7 9.3 8.5 7.3 5.7 4.2 3.0 1_011 4A 5.4 6A 7.1 7-3 7-2 6.7 6.2 5.8 5.7 5.8 6.2 6-6 6.8 6.7 6A 6.0 5.7 5-7 5-9 6.3 6.7 6.8 6.7 6A 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.6 7A 8-2 8.8 9.5 9.9 10.3 10.9 11A 12.0 12-5 12.2 •11.5 10.2 8.06,8 5-0 3.6 3-9 4.9 5.8 6-5 7.Q 6-9 6.5 6.1 5-9 5.8 5-9 6.1 6-5 6-8 6-7 6-3 5.9 5-8 5-8 5-9 6-2 6-7 6-9 6.7 6.3 6.1 6.1 6-3 6-8 7.6 8-7 9.9 •10-9 11-9 13.1 14.1 15A 15-8 96-1 15-8 14-7 12-8 •10.7 8-3 6-2 4-3 15 4-5 5.5 6-3 6.7 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.8 5.7 5.8 6-2 6,6 6-8 6.7 6.4 6.0 5.7 5.7 5-9 6-4 6.8 6.9 6.7 6A 6.1 6A 6.3 6.9 8.0 94 11.0 •12-8 14-6 16.3 18A 19.7 20.8 21,0 20-4 •18-7 16-2 •13.5 10.4 7,5 5-3 3.2 4.2 5.3 6A 6.5 6.6 6.5 6.1 5.7 5.5 5.8 6.3 6Z 6.6 6A 6A 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.9 6.4 6.7 67 8.7 6.5 6A 5.9 6.3 7.1 8.3 10.0 12.2 14.8 •17.6 20A 22.5 24.8 26.4 26.8 25-9 23.7 20.4 16.6 12.9 9.3 6.4 3A 4.1 5.2 5.8 6.4 6.5 6.2 6.0 5.7 5A 5.8 6.1 6.3 6.7 6.5 62 6.0 5.6 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.5 6.8 6.5 6.3 6A 5.9 6.3 7.2 8.4 10.6 13.4 16.7 20.6 24.0 27.9 30.7 32.7 33.6 32.0 29.3 25.3 20.3 15.7 11.3 7.7 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.6 6.6 A16 6.0 5.8 5.5 5.3 5.7 5.9 6.2 6.9A16.5 6.D 5.8 5.4 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.4 1 7A`I 6.4 6.1 5.9 5.7 6.1 7.0 6.4 11.1 A46 18.6 23.4 27.9 32.9 5 9 4 . 1 3 34 8 1 18.6 13.2 8.9 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 MH: 10.5 2.8 3.7 4.7 5.4 5.8 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.0 5.3 5.7 5.9 6.1 6.0 5.8 5.5 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.8 6.0 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.5 5.3 5.7 6.5 7.8 10.3 14.0 19.5 2 6.D 31.2 37.0 41.4 44.4 45A.8 43.6 39.8 34.3 27.3 21.2 15.0 10.0 2.5 3.3 4.3 5.0 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.0 4.7 4.5 4.7 5.2 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.9 5.3 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.4 5,D 4.8 5.1 5.9 7.1 8.9 11.6 17.1 '26.9 33.9 404 M 6 O4 0 n . 4$�.544.0 7.7134 2 23.1 16.3 10.9 35.5 42.3 47.6 51.3 53..0F1570.6 46.2 39.7 31.7 24.3 17.2 11.5 34-6 42 3 Ml�I:$1{ �a6 tH F �.5A�:11d.2n 24.5 17-3 11-5 GIFT 1 FLOWER 5 ART UP BOUTIQUE SHOP 33.2 40.0 45.9 49.7 51.5 49-2 45.Q 38-6 30.8 23.7 163 11,1 GALLERY 1 SHOP El 569 30,a 36' A a 4 5 4}�-1 '4 414 21.9 15.5 ib-3 EVENT 568 M I:10y MH: �i�.5 ail.d�s 567 UP 91 - 2" 71 - 6n 28.9 32.2 36.7 39.8 41.6 39.6 36.4 31.3 2522 19.5 13-8 9-2 I 22.7 27 2 :9133.4 35 Ll . 33.3.530.6 .61 a.�4 16.7 12.D 8.1 18.3 21.9 25A i12.7..2 28.3 27.1 24.9 21.5 17.7 14.3 10.3 7.0 PARKING ENTRY 4 5 6 W B.O.1- 1 01A ONESTOP I NJ 4 1 1r, C11 LWO ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVE #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PROPRIETARY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT INCORPORATES PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF ONE STOP - DESIGN. ANY PARTY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT DOES SO IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONE STOP DESIGN. COPYRIGHT ONE STOP DESIGN 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONTRACTOR NOTICE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPENCIES WITH THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 /05/21 ISSUE MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE PROJECT ARCHITECT AS INDICATED T.B.D PROJECT OSD-21-02 NUMBER 10/15/21 DATE SHEET NAME PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - GARAGE P1 SHEET NUMBER P103 E u C A 2 4 5 6 E V C M LO W LO U C O CI C CU 3 O O O -C .3 CU 1? 07 06 O 1n a� ca U N E O H C U O 0 o O X Q 0)U NT ce) N N O :3 07 CU +� r j �^L O L � c U L O I Lumminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Total Lamp Lumens LLF Description 37 Al SINGLE N.A. 0.850 Barron 11 TLED-SC-64-VS-G 4 A2 SINGLE N.A. 0.850 Barron 11 TLED-SC-24-VS-G Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min P2 Floor Illuminance Fc 5.89 10.2 1.0 5.89 10.20 Jobname Temecula Resort & Spa (Parking Garage-P2)_2021-10-14.AGI Report for: Andrew Crane Report by: Ismael Avina-Prieto / Applications Engineer Mounting Ht.: See Drawing See Luminaire Schedule for Light Loss Factor - Unless otherwise specified by customer Reflectance: 20/20/20 - Unless otherwise specified by customer Date:10/1412021 ------ Disclaimer------ Luminaire data is obtained according to IES procedures under controlled laboratory conditions. Field results may differ from computer predictions due to many uncontrollable factors including, but not limited to Line Voltage Variations, Lamp Performance, Ballast input watts, LED Drivers input watts, Temperature Variations and Jobsite Conditions. 2 3 1.1 '1.7 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.3 '1.9 '1.8 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.0 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2 1.1 2.0 3.0 3.9 4.3 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.0 2.6 2.9 3.6 4.1 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.4 3. 1.6 3.0 4.7 5.7 6.3 6.4 5.9 5.0 4.0 3.6 4.0 4.9 5.9 6.5 6.7 6.5 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.5 6.7 6.4 5. 2.7 4.9 6.0 7A 7.5 7.5 7.2 6.2 4.9 4A 4.8 6.0 7.2 7.7 7.9 7.9 7.7 7.3 7.8 7.9 7.8 7.7 7. 3.4 4-0 3.8 4.6 5.7 6.7 7.6 8.5 p l84-1 7 6 6.7 5-3 4-9 5.2 6.6 7-6 8,b A1.0 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.5 8.5 VA lP 8.6p 7. - 3.7 4.4�4.4 4.9 5.8 6.8 7.7 8.3 MH: 5 6.8 5A 4.9 5.3 6.6 7.7 8.6 $' 8.5 8.1 8,6 8.6 8.9M .3'•7 . MH: 8.75 3.5 3-9 4-1 4.3 4.9 5.6 6.3 7A 7.9 7.8 7.5 6A 5-1 4.7 5.0 6.2 7.5 8-0 8.3 8.2 7.9 73 8.0 8.3 8� 8.0 7. Li f 3-2 3-9 4-4 4-4 4-4 4.7 5-2 5.8 6.6 7-3 7-4 6-8 5-8 4.8 4.3 4.8 5.7 6-8 7-6 7.7 7A 7.2 7-2 7.2 7.5 7-8 7-4 6. El 1� 5. 4.3 4.8 4A 4.9 4.6 4.3 4.7 5.6 6.3 6.8 6A 6.4 5.7 4.7 4A 4.6 5.6 6A 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.6 6.9 '7.0 7.1 7.2 6.8 6. A2 4A 5.6 MR:68.7 54 7.5 '7.1 6.5 5.6 4-9 4.4 4.7 5.5 6.5 7.2 7.3 6.8 5.8 4.9 4.3 4.8 5.7 6.8 7.6 7.8 7.4 7.2 7.3 7.2 T6 7 5 '7.4 6. 4.3 5.6 7.1 8.5 8.8 8.3 7.7 6.6 5.4 4.8 4.9 5.9 7.2 7.8 7.9 7.5 6A 5.2 4A 5.1 6A 7.6 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.0 7.8 8A 8.3 8.3 8.1 7. 2.7 4.0 5.5 7.2 8.7 9.1 9.1 8.2 7.2 5.8 5.1 5.2 6.4 7.6 8.3 8.5 7.9 6.9 5.6 5.1 5.5 6.8 7.9 8.7 8.9 8.7 8.6 8:3 8.8 8.8 9j.0 8.5 7. 0 0 0 2.0 12 4.7 6.6 8.1 8.9 941 8.3 7.3 5.9 5.2 5.3 6.5 7.6 80 .6 4.7.9 7.0 5.7 5.2 5.6 6.9 7.9 9.2 A1.3 8.8 8.8 B.5 8. 8 .6A1 8.9 8. MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH. 8.75 {'�LLVg :8.75 1.3 1.7 2.6 4,0 5.6 7.4 8.2 8-3 S.0 7.1 5.7 5.0 5.1 16.2 7.5 8.1 8.2 7.8 6.8 5.4 5.0 5.3 6.7 7.8 8.4 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.1 5' " 4T �.9-' ` 8.3 7. R8M 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.5 3.6 5.0 6A 7.5 7.8 7.4 6A 5.3 4.6 4.8 5.6 6.8 7.6 7.7 7.2 6.2 5.1 4.6 5.0 6.1 7.3 8.0 6.2 7.9 7.6 7.5 7.7 245 8.1 7.8 6. .I I 2-8 2-6 2-5 2.7 3.4 4-7 518 6-7 7.1 6-7 5-9 5-0 4-3 4.4 5A 6-3 7-0 7-1 6-6 5-7 4-8 4.2 4.7 5-7 6-6 7-3 7-5 7-2 to 7.1 7-1 7.3 7-4 7.1 6- 4.8 4-5 4-0 3-7 3-3 3.7 4.8 5.9 6-7 7A 6.7 5.9 5-0 4-2 4,4 5.4 6.3 6-9 7-1 6-6 5.$ 4.$ 4,2 4.7 5.7 6.6 7-3 7.4 7.2 7.1 7,1 7.1 7.3 7+ 7.0 6. 6.8 6.5 5.7 4-7 4.2 4.2 5-2 6A 7.3 7.7 7.4 6.4 5.2 4.7 4A 5.7 6.8 7.6 7.7 7.2 6A 5A 4Z 5.0 6,0 7.2 7.9 8.1 7.9 7-6 7.5 7.6 8,0 8A 7.7 6. 7.9 8.0 7-6 6A 5.6 4.8 4-8 5.7 7.1 7.9 8.1 7.9 'TA 5.7 5.a 5.1 6.2 7.5 8.1 S.1 7.8 6.8 5.4 5.0 5.3 6.7 7.8 8.3 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.1 8.5 8.6 8.5 8.3 7. 8A �2 8A 7.3 6.1 5 A 5 A 6.0 7.3 8.3 �-1 8.1 7.3 6.0 5.2 5.4 6.5 7.6 8.7 E, 9.0 7.9 7.0 5.7 5.2 5.5 6.9 7.9 9.�j 9.3 8.8 8.8 8.5 8.9 8.9 � 8.8 S. Al Al Al y� Al Al 7.4 8.2 8.8M 7$.4 6.1 5.1 5.0 6.0 7.3 8.1 8H g8r757.2 5.9 5.1 5.2 6.4 7.6 8.35 6.9 5.6 5.2 5.5 5.9 7.9 8.8 Mqt $=� 8.7 8.3 8.8 8.7 '9.1MI•�A.7 6.9 8,0 8.1 8.0 7.1 5.7 4.9 4.8 5.6 6.9 7.7 7.9 7.7 6.8 5.5 4.8 5.0 5.9 7.2 7.8 7.9 7.6 6.5 5.2 4.8 5A 6A 7.6 8.2 8.4 8.3 6.0 7.8 8.1 8A 8.3 8.1 7. 5.5 6.7 7.6 7.9 7.5 6.5 5.3 4.5 4.4 5.2 6i2 7.1 7.4 7.0 6.1 5.1 4.4 4. 5.4 5.4 7.3 7.4 6.8 5.8 4.9 _ 4.4 4.8 5.8 6.9 7.6 7.8 71 1--7,3 7.2 7.3 7.6 7.8 7.4 6. 7.1 6.3 7.4 7.8 7.8 7.2 6.2 5.2 4.3 4.2 5.0 5:9 6.5 6.9 6-5 5-8 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.3 6A 6.7 6.9 6.4 5.7 4.7 4.1 4.6 5.6 6A 7.1 7.2 7.1 7.0 6,9 7.0 7.1 7,7 6.8 6. .1 5-5 6.7 8.0 8.8 8-6 7.8 6-5 5.4 4.5 4.4 5.1 6A 7.1 7A 6.9 6.0 5.0 4.4 4.5 SA 6A 7.2 7-4 '6-8 5-7 4.9 4.3 4.8 5.7 6-8 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.5 7.7 7.3 6. 4-4 5.9 7.4 8-8 9.7 9.3 8-5 7.4 5,8 4-9 4.7 5.5 6.8 7.6 7.8 7-6 6.6 5-3 4.7 4.8 5.8 7.1 7.7 7-8 7.5 6.3 5.1 4.7 5.0 6.2 ,�7 1 -8611 8.3 8.2 7-9 7.7 8.0 8.3 8.2 8-0 o H2 y . ] C} 3.3 4.0 I�f�l: 5. 5 9.2 10.2 9-1 7.8 6.2 5-1 5.0 5.8 7.2 8.0 8A 7-8 7-1 5.7 4-9 5.0 6-2 7-4 8-2 8-4 7.7 6-8 5-4 5.O 5.3 6.7 7.7 8.6 8.8 8.6 SA 8.2 8.6 8.6 8-9 8.5 7. Q o 0 q*5. o 0 9.8A19.1 7.7 6.2 5.1 4.9 5.8 7.1 8.0 841 7.9 6.9 5.6 4,9 5.0 6.2 7.3 8.4$ 7.fi 6.7 5.4 5,0 5.3 6.6 7.6 9.0.1 8.5 8.5 8.2 8.5 8.5 9.3A18-6 7. MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 7.9 7.9 7.0 5.6 4.6 4.5 5.3 6.7 7.3 7.6 7.3 6.5 5.1 4.5 4.6 5.6 6.9 7.4 7.5 7.2 6.2 4.9 4.5 4.8 6.1 7.3 7.8 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.5 T9 8,0 7,9 7.8 7. i 6.6 6.5 5.7 4.6 3.8 3.7 4.4 5.4 6.2 6.5 6.2 5.3 4.3 3.7 3.8 4.6 5.7 6.4 6.4 6.0 5.1 4.2 3.7 4.1 5.1 6.2 6.7 6.9 6.7 6.4 6.3 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.6 5. 4.5 4.4 3.9 3.3 2.8 2.7 3.2 3.8 4.3 4.5 4.3 3.7 3.2 2.7 2.8 3A 3.9 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.6 3.2 2.8 3.2 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.0 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.5 4. f-; 2.6 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.7 1.7 2.1 2A 2.7 2.7 2.5 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.8 2. r i _ - - - � 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.7 2I6- I 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.4 1. 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.0 1.7 '1.6 1.8 2.1 2.5 2-6 2.6 2.3 1.9 1.6 1.6 1 A 2-2 15 2.6 2.5 2.2 '1-8 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.3 2-6 2.6 2-4 2.1 1-8 1.9 22 2.7 3.0 3-3 3.2 3.0 2.5 1.9 '1 A 1.1 4.4 4.4 4.3 3-8 3.3 2-7 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.1 4A 4-2 3-7 3.2 2-6 2.6 3.2 3.7 4.2 4-4 4-1 3-6 3-1 2-6 2.7 3-3 18 4-3 4-4 4.0 3.5 3-1 2-7 3.1 3-7 4.3 4-6 4-6 4.1 3-4 2.4 1.5 6.0 6-4 6.3 5.7 4-7 3-8 3.6 4,1 5-1 6.0 6-3 6.2 5-4 4-4 3.7 3.7 4.3 5.3 6.1 6-4 6,0 5-2 4.2 3-6 3.8 4-5 5.6 6.2 6.3 5-9 5-0 4-1 3.7 '4,0 '4.9 6-0 6-4 6.4 5,7 4.4 3.0 '1.7 7.4 7.6 7.5 7-0 5.7 4.6 4.4 4.9 6.3 T2 7.5 7.3 6.7 5A 4A 4.5 5.2 6.6 7.3 7.4 7.2 6.4 5-1 4A 4.5 5.6 6.8 7.4 7.5 7.2 6.2 4.9 4.5 4.7 6.0 7.1 7.5 7.4 6,8 5.3 3.4 2.0 '1.0 7.9 8.fij 8.5 7.4 6.3 5.6 4.8 5.4 6.8 7.7 -8 8.1 7.1 6.0 4.9 4.9 5.8 7.0 8.0 �.8 7.8 6.9 5.6 4.9 5.0 6.2 7.3 8.3 E, 8.7 7.6 6.7 5.3 4.9 5.2 6.5 '7.5 8.b 8.5 7.2 5.8 3.6 2.1 1.0 Al All p Al AlAlAl 8.0 8.5 W' $• 6.4 5.1 4.9 5.4 6.9 7.7 8.5MI ft.Y•7� 3 6.0 5.Q 4.9 5.8 7.2 7.9 8. H:�757.0 5.6 4.9 5.0 6.2 7.4 8.2 W'V: �7� 6.7 5.4 4.9 5.2 6.6 7.6 8.4 M $ I 7.4 7.9 7.8 7.3 6.0 4.9 4.6 5.1 6.5 7.5 7.8 7.7 6.9 5.7 4.7 4.7 5A 6.8 7.6 7.8 7.6 6.6 5.3 4.7 4.8 5.8 7.1 7.7 7.8 7.4 6.3 5.1 4.7 4.9 6.2 7.3 7.7 7.7 7.3 +S T+A R - 3 6.5 7.3 7.3 6.5 5.4 4.6 4.2 4.9 5.8 6.8 7.4 7.1 6.2 5.2 4.4 4.4 5.1 6.1 7.0 7A 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.3 6A 7.2 7.3 6.8 5.8 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.7 6.8 7.7 7.7 6.8 I 6.1 6.8 6.8 6.2 5.4 4.3 4.0 4.7 5.7 6A 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.1 4.2 4.1 5.0 5.9 6.6 6.8 6.5 5.8 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.6 4.6 4.0 4.5 5.5 6.4 7.3 7.8 8.0 6.6 5.0 4.6 3.7 El A2 6.5 7-3 7.3 6.5 5.5 4.6 4.3 4-9 5.9 6.8 7.3 7.1 6.2 5.2 4.4 4.3 5.1 6A 7.0 7.3 6-9 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.3 6A 7-1 7.3 6.7 5-7 4.8 4,3 4.7 5.7 6-8 7-8 8.2 8.3 7.5 5.9 Mi: $9 7-$ 7,9 7-$ 7-3 6-Q 4-9 4-7 5-2 6.5 7.5 7-8 7-7 6-9 5.6 4-7 4_l 5,5 6,8 7-6 7-8 7-6 6-fi 5.3 4-7 4,s 5-$ 7-1 7-7 7-s 7-5 6-3 5-1 4.7 5A 6-2 7-5 8-2 8-7 8-$ 7-9 6,3 4.7 3.8 8.1 8.6 8A 7.7 6.6 5-3 5-0 5.6 7,a 7.8 8.5 8.1 7-3 1&0 5-0 4,9 5.8 7,2 i 8.0 8-5 7.9 7A 5.7 4.9 5.1 6.2 7A 8.3 8.4 7.7 6.$ 5.4 5.0 5-3 6.7 7.8 8.7 9.0 8,7 1 7.S 6.1 4.6 3.3 0 0 sae �a o I 8.2 9.'Al. 8 7-7 6.6 5.3 5.1 5.6 7.0 7.8 9'.A18-3 7-2 6.0 4.9 4.9 5.8 7,1 8.1 92T1 8.0 7.Q 5.7 4.9 5.0 6.2 7.4 8-4 �`� 7-7 6.8 5.5 5.a 5.4 6.$ 7.8 9-i-1 8-2 7.1 5.3 3.8 2,4 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 7.9 8.2 8.1 7.6 6.3 5.1 4.9 5.2 6.6 7.6 8.0 7.8 7.0 5.5 4.5 4.5 5A 6.8 7.6 8.0 7.7 6.7 5.3 4.5 4.6 5.7 7.2 7.8 8.0 7.5 6A 5.0 4.7 5A 6.5 7.7 8.1 8.2 7.7 6.2 4A 2.9 1 8 201 - 211 7.1 7.7 7.6 7.0 5.7 4.8 4.6 3.f ..3:9 4A- 15 1 _ .$.9 8 3 -1�:1 1 4.8 5.9 7.0 7.6 7.6 6.8 5.3 3.8 2.4 1.3. STAIR-1 6.3 7.0 6.9 6.3 5.4 4.5 3.5 2.5 2.3 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.2 1.9 '1.6 '1.6 '1.9 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.3 1.9 '1.7 '1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.2 2.0 2.6 4.0 5.4 6.4 7.0 6.8 6.1 4.9 34 2.0 '1.1 6.3 6.9 6.9 6.2 5.4 4.2 3.3 3.5 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.2 3.8 3.2 2.7 2.6 3.2 3.7 4.2 4A 4.1 3.6 3.1 2.6 2.8 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.4 4.0 3.7 3.4 3.3 4.1 5.3 6.2 6.8 6.8 6.0 4.8 3.3 1.9- ._ti.- 7.0 7.5 7.5 6.8 5.6 4.5 4.0 4A 5.2 6A 6A 6.2 5.5 4.4 3.7 3.6 4.3 5.3 6.1 6.3 6.1 5.2 4.2 3.7 3.8 4.6 5.6 6.2 6.4 6.0 5.1 4.3 4.0 4.6 5.7 6.9 7.4 7.4 6.6 5A 3.5 2.0 1.1 2-4 3-8 5-8 7.4 7-9 7-9 7-4 6-2 4-9 4-6 5-1 6-4 7.3 7.5 7-4 6-7 5-4 4-5 4.5 5.2 6-6 7-3 7-5 7-2 6-4 5-1 4-4 4.5 5.6 6-8 7-4 7.5 7-2 6-2 5-0 4-6 5-0 6.3 7-5 7-9 7-8 7.2 5.6 3.7 2.2 1-1 2.6 4.0 6.1 7.5 8.fg 8.6 7.6 6.5 5.2 5.0 5.6 6.9 T7 8.1 7.2 6-0 4.9 4.9 5.8 T1 8.0 �8-8 7.8 6.9 5.6 4.9 5,0 6.1 7.3 8-4 p 8.7 7.6 6.7 5.4 15,0 5.3 6.7 7.6 8.b, 8.6 `1.3 5.9 3.9 2,3 1.1 Al Al gg Al Al Al a 2.6 4.0 6.1 7.4 8.3 $•aq T$ 6.4 5-2 5.0 5.5 6.9 7.8 8.5M .�•7Y.3 6.0 4.9. 5.Q 5.$ 7.1 7.9 8"H' 757.Q 5.7 4.9 5.fl 6.2 '7.48.1 5 6.$ 5.4 4.9 5.3 6.6 7.6 8.3 $ Y_§ 5.$ 3.8 2.3 1.1 2.5 3.8 5.5 7.1 T6 T7 7.3 6.0 4.9 4-7 5.2 6.5 7.5 7.8 7-7 7.0 5.6 4.7 4.7 5.4 6.8 7.6 7.8 7.6 6.6 5.3 4.7 4.8 5.8 7.1 7.7 7.8 7.5 6.4 5.1 4.7 5A 6.1 7.4 7.7 7.6 7.0 5.3 3.6 2.1 1.1 1 31 - 611 2.2 3.6 5.0 6.3 T2 7.2 6.5 5.5 4.5 4.3 4.9 5.8 6A 7A 7.1 6.2 5.2 4A 4.4 5.1 6A 7.0 7A 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.3 6.4 7.2 7.3 6.7 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.7 5.6 6.6 7.22 7.1 6.2 4.8 3.4 '1.9 '1.0 2.1 3.4 4.9 5.9 6.6 6.6 6.1 5.4 4.4 4.0 4.7 5.7 6.4 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.1 4.2 4.1 5.0 5.9 6.5 6.8 6.4 5.8 4.9 4.1 4.3 5.2 6.1 6.6 6.8 6.4 5.6 4.6 4.0 4.5 5.5 6.2 6.7 6.5 5.8 4.7 3.1 1.8 1.0 2.3 3.5 5.0 6.3 7A 7.1 6.4 5.4 4.5 4.2 4.9 5.8 6.8 7.3 7.1 6.2 5.2 4.4 4.3 5.1 6.1 7.0 7.4 6.9 6.0 5.0 4.3 4.5 5.3 6.3 7.2 7.3 6.7 5.7 4.8 4.2 4.6 5.5 6.5 7.1 7.0 6.1 4.8 3.3 1.9 1.0 2.5 3.8 5.5 7.0 7.6 7.7 7.1 5.9 4.8 4.7 5.2 6.5 7.5 7.8 7.7 7..0 5.6 4.8 4.7 5.5 6:8 7.6 7.8 7.6 6.6 5.3 4.7 4,8 5.8 7.1 7.7 7.8 7.5 6.3 5.1 4.6 4.9 6.1 7.3 7.7 7.5 6.9 5.3 3.5 2.1 '1.0 2.7 4.0 5.9 7.3 8.2 8.2 7.5 6A 5.1 4.9 5.5 6.9 7.8 8.5 8.1 7.3 6.0 5-0 4.9 5.9 712 8.0 8-5 7-9 7.1 9.7 4.9 5.0 6.2 7-4 8.2 8-4 7-7 6-8 5-4 4.9 5.2 6.6 7.5 8.2 8.1 7.2 5.8 3.7 2.2 1.1 El El '2Y 4A 6-0 7.3 8- Q A�-5 7-4 6-4 5-1 4.9 5.6 6.9 7.8 9 0A18.3 7.2 6.0 5-0 5.0 5-9 7:2 8-1 941 7-9 7-0 5-7 5.0 5.1 8.2 7.4 8-5 � 7.6 6-7 5-4 4-9 5.2 6-6 7.5 8-a A:`1.5 7-1 5.7 3.8 2.2 '1.0 MH: 815 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 MH: 8.75 2.4 3.7 5.6 7.0 7.5 7.6 7.1 5.9 4.7 4-6 5.1 6.5 7A 7.7 7.6 7.0 5.6 4-fi 4.7 5A 6:8 7.5 7.7 7.5 6.7 5,2 4.6 4,7 5.8 7-1 7.6 7.7 7. 6.3 5.0 4,5 4,8 6,1 7,2 7.6 7.5 6.9 5.3 34 2.0 2-0 3.2 4A 6.2 6.7 6.9 6.3 5.0 4.1 3.8 4.4 5.4 6.6 7A 6.7 6.0 4.8 3.9 3.9 4.6 5,7 6.7 7.1 6.6 5.7 4.5 3.8 4.1 4.8 6.2 6.8 7.0 6. 5A 4.2 3.8 4.2 5,0 6.4 6.9 6.6 6.1 4.6 3.0 '1.7 ART STORAGE OPEN BELOW GALLERY 1 EVENT 565 556 4 5 ONESTOP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVE #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PROPRIETARY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT INCORPORATES PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF ONE STOP - DESIGN. ANY PARTY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT DOES SO IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONE STOP DESIGN. COPYRIGHT ONE STOP DESIGN 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONTRACTOR NOTICE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPENCIES WITH THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 /05/21 ISSUE MARK I DATE I DESCRIPTION SCALE PROJECT ARCHITECT AS INDICATED T.B.D PROJECT OSD-21-02 NUMBER 10/15/21 DATE SHEET NAME PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - GARAGE P2 SHEET NUMBER P104 E P1 C B A 3 4 5 C E Ll If M LO W LA U C O CI C CU 3 0) O O 3 ca I O_ 06 V- O N c� U O E N H C U O L o co2 Q � X 04 U 'T a) M N N O U) Co O L n O Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label 29 Al 1 A2 Calculation Summary Label CalcType P3 Floor Illuminance Arrangement SINGLE SINGLE 1.2 1.9 2.4 2.8 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.5 2A 3.0 3.1 2.9 2. 1.8 2.6 3.3 4.0 4.4 4A 4.0 3.4 2.8 2.3 2.3 2.8 3.4 4.0 4.4 4.5 �i 4.2 3. 22 32 43 52 55 55 52 44 35 29 29 34 43 52 55 56 55 4 Total Lamp Lumens LLF Description 2.5 3.7 5.0 5-7 6.2 6.2 5.8 5.1 4.0 3-4 3.3 3.9 5.0 5.8 6.2 6A 6.2 5. N.A. 0.850 Barron 11 TLED-SC-64-VS-G 2.7 3.9 5.3 6.0 7,P AJ.O 6.1 5.4 4,3 3.6 3.6 42 5.3 6.1 7A E' 6.5 5. N.A. 0.850 Barron // TLED-SC-24-VS-G MH: 9.75 �IIIH: T5 27 40 53 62 68 68 63 55 44 37 36 42 54 62 67 70 66 5 Units Avg Max Min Fc 5.21 8.0 1.0 Jobname Temecula Resort & Spa (Parking Garage -P3)_2021-10-14.AG1 Report for: Andrew Crane Report by: Ismael Avina-Prieto / Applications Engineer Mounting Ht.: See Drawing See Luminaire Schedule for Light Loss Factor - Unless otherwise specified by customer Reflectance: 20/20/20 - Unless otherwise specified by customer Date:10/14/2021 ------Disclaimer------ Luminaire data is obtained according to JES procedures under controlled laboratory conditions. Field results may differ from computer predictions due to many uncontrollable factors including, but not limited to Line Voltage Variations, Lamp Performance, Ballast input watts, LED Drivers input watts, Temperature Variations and Jobsite Conditions. 1 1 2 2.7 3-9 5-2 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.3 5.4 4.3 3-6 3-5 4.2 5j 6.3 6.7 6Fa 6.6 5. Avg/Min Max/Min - -. 2.6 3.9 *& 1 6.1 . -6.6 6.6 6.1 5.2 4.3 3.6 3,5-., 4-2 5.1 6.0 6.7 6.8 6.4 5. 5.21 8.00 2.6 4.0 5A 5.9 6.5 6.5 6.0 5.3 4.4 3.5 3.5 4.3 5.2 5.9 6.5 6.7 6.2 5. 3 2.7 3.9 5.2 6.2 6.7 6A 6.3 5.3 4.3 3.7 3.6 4.2 5.2 6.2 6.8 J 6.9 6.6 5. 2.8 4.0 5.4 6.3 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.6 4.4 3.8 3.8 4.3 5.5 6.4 6.8 6.9 6.7 6. 2.9 4.2 5.5 6.4 T2 7.1 6.4 5.7 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.4 5-.6 6.4 7.2 7. 6.8 6. El All°P1 2.9 4.2 5.5 6.3 7.2 MR 9.16 5.7 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.4 5.6 6.4 7.1 �: 915 6. 2.8 4.0 5A 6.4 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.6 4.4 3.8 3.8 4.3 5.5 6.4 6.8 6;9 6.7 6. 2.7 3.9 5.2 6.3 6A 6.8 6.3 5A 4A 3.7 3.7 4.2 5.2 6.3 6.9 6.9 6.6 5. 2.6 4.0 5.1 6.0 6.5 6.5 6.0 5.3 4-4 3.6 3.5 4.3 5.3 6.0 6.6 6.7 6-2 5. 2.7 4.0 5A 6A 6.7 6.7 6.2 5-3 4A 3.6 3.6 4.3 5-2 6.1 6.7 6:8j 6.4 5, 2.8 4-0 5-3 6.3 6.8 6.8 6-4 5-5 4.4 3-8 3-7 4-3 5-3 6-3 6.8 7,0 6.7 5. 2.8 4-1 5.5 6.4 6.9 6.9 6A 5-7 4.5 3.9 3.8 4A 5.6 6.4 TO 7:1I 6A 6. 2.9 4.2 5.5 6.4 7.P Aj.3 6-4 5-7 4.6 3.9 3.9 4.5 5.6 6.4 7.3 El d1 6.8 6. MH: 9.75 MH: 9.75 2.8 4.1 5.5 6.3 6.9 6.9 6.4 5.7 4.5 3.9 3.8 4.4 5.6 6 A 6.9 7.1 6.8 6. 2.7 4.0 5.3 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.4 5.5 4A 3.7 3.7 4.3 5.3 6.4 6.8 6.9 6.7 5. I -- - 2.7 3.9 5.1 6.1 6.7 6.7 6.1 5.3 4.4 3.6 3.6 4.3 5.2 6.1 6.7 6.8 6.4 5. 2.6 4.0 5.1 5.9 6.5 6.5 6.0 5.3 4.4 3.5 3.5 4.2 52 5.9 6.6 6 6.2 5. 2.6 3.9 5.2 6.2 6.7 6.8 6.2 5.3 4.3 3.6 3.6 4.2 5.2 6.2 6.8 6.9 6.5 5. 2.7 3.9 5.3 6.3 6.7 6.7 6.3 6A 4.3 3.7 3.6 42 5.3 6.3 6.7 6.� 6.7 5. 2.7 4.0 5A 6.2 TO 7.0 6.2 5.5 4.4 3.7 3.7 4.2 5A 6.2 6.9 7.2 6.6 6. ° Al ° �#1 2.6 3.9 5.2 6.0 6.9 9.?6 5-3 4.2 3.6 3.6 4.1 5-3 6.0 6.8 ININ: i-15 5. 231 - 2" 2-4 3.5 4.8 5-6 5.9 6.0 5.7 44-9 3-9 3-3 3-2 3.8 4.8 5.6 6,0 6A 6-0 5- 2A 2.9 3-9 4.8 5.2 5.2 4.9 4-2 3A 2-9 2-8 3-3 4.0 4.8 5.2 5.2 5.0 4. 1.5 2.3 2.9 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.8 3A 2-9 2.4 2.3 2-8 3.2 15 3A 3� 3.6 3. 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.2 2A 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.4 2. 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.0 1.6 1.1 -,1.6 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.9 1.8 1,71 1.4 1. 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.1 3.2 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.4 1.9 1.7 2.4 2.9 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.2 3.8 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.5 4.1 3.7 3.4 3.4 3.6 4.0 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.0 3.6 3.4 3.4 3.7 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.0 3A 2.7 2.1 2.9 3.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.1 3.5 2.7 1.8 1.1 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.5 4.8 4.3 4.3 4.4 5.1 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.4 4.7 4.3 4.3 4.6 5.3 5.6 5.7 5.6 5.2 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.7 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.2 4A 3.4 2.4 3.3 4.5 5.3 5.6 5.6 5.2 4.3 3.0 2.0 1.1 6-4 6.7 6.5 6A 5.6 5.0 4-8 5.2 5.9 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.0 5A 4.9 4.9 5-4 6.0 1 6.3 6.5 6.3 5.9 5.3 4.8 4.9 5.5 6.0 6.3 6.3 5,8 5.2 4.0 _ _ 3.7 5.0 5.8 6.3 6-3 5.8 4.9 3A 2.2 1.2 6.8 7.� A�,3 6,4 6.0 5-4 5-1 5.6 6.2 6.74A17.0 6.3 5.8 5.2 5.2 5.7 5.2 6.9 °rl 6.7 6.2 5.6 5.1 5.3 5.8 6.3 7.0 �� 5.2 5.a 4.3 2-9 4A 5.3 6.1 7.'P A�.O 6.1 5.1 3.5 2.2 1.2 6.8 7.2 NCH: 7.1 9.75 6.1 5-5 5.2 5.6 6.3 6.7 MF : 9.75 7,1 7.0 6.5 5.9 5-3 5-3 5.8 6.4 6-8 MH: 9.75 7A 6.8 6A 5.7 5.3 5.3 5-9 6.5 6-6 (IAH: Q.75 5.5 4.4 2.9 4,0 5.4 6-2 6.8 MH: 9.75 1 1 6.6 6.9 6.3 6.9 6.4 6-6 7-1 7.0 6.7 6-0 5-3 5-2 5.5 6-3 6-8 7.0 6.9 16.5 5-$ 5-2 5-2 5.7 6-4 6-9 7-0 6-8 6.3 5.5 5-2 5-2 5-7 6-5 6-8 6.7 6-4 5-4 4.2 2.9 3.9 5-3 6-4 6-7 6-7 6-5 S.TA[R 3 6.3 7.0 7A 6.5 5.8 5.3 5.2 5.5 6.1 6.7 7,0 6.8 6,3 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.2 6.8 7.0 6.7 6.1 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.6 6.3 6.8 6.7 6.2 5.3 4.2 2.9 '4.0 5.2 6-3 7.2 7.4 6.8 6.1 6.8 6.8 6.3 5.8 5.3 5.1 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.1 6.6 6.8 6.6 &0 5.5 5.1 5.2 5.7 6.1 6.6 6.6 6A 5.2 4.3 2.8 4.0 5.2 6.2 7.1 7.7 7.7 6.5 4.8 IS' 3.3 6.6 7.1 T1 6.7 5A 5A 5.2 5.5 6.2 6.8 7A 7.0 6.5 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.3 6.9 7.1 6.8 62 5.5 5.2 5.2 5.7 6.4 6.8 6.8 6.4 5.4 4.2 2.9 3.9 5.3 6.5 7.3 7.9 8.0 7.1 5.6 }�� A 5 : 115 6.9 7.2 7.1 6.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.9 7.1 7.0 6.6 5.9 5.3 5.3 5.8 6.5 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.4 5.7 5.2 5.3 5.9 6.6 6.8 6.8 6.5 5.6 4.4 3.0 4.0 5.5 6.6 7.3 7.7 7.9 7.3 5.9 4.5 3.5 7.1 7.7 7.5 6.8 6.4 5.7 5.4 5.8 6.4 6.9 7.5 7.0 6.6 6.0 5.4 5.3 5.9 6.4 1 7.0 7.5 6.9 6.4 5.8 5.3 5.4 6.0 6.5 7.1 7.2 6.4 5.6 4.4 4.2 5.6 6.6 7.6 7.8 T5 7.0 5.8 4.4 3.3 El All r'A1 E' Al °a1 Al 7.1 7.8 M 9.?S 6.3 5.8 5.4 5.7 8.3 6.8 7AM� 19 7 .4 5.8 5.2 .5.2 5.7 6.3 6.9 7�H:6.756.3 5.6 5.1 5.3 5.9 B.4 7.0 M : 7�5 5.5 4.3 3.1 4.2 5.7 6.6 7.5 MCI? 9.� 6.4 5.1 3.9 2.7 . 6.9 . 7.2 . 7.1 . 6.8 20T-211 . . 6.2 5.6 . 5.4 . 5A . 6.1 . 6.5 . . 6.7 6.6 . 6.3 . 5A . 4-8 . 4.8 . 5.3 16. 1 . 6.6 16, . 7 6.5 . 6.1 . 5.2 . 4.8 . 4.9 . 5.5 . 6.2 . 6.5 . 6.5 16. 1 .13. 5.3 '4. 0 0 - . 4.2 . 5.7 . 6.6 . 6.9 . 7.0 . 6.7 15, 8 . 4.4 . 3.2 . 2.2 6,6 7.2 7.1 6,7 6.0 5.4 5.2 I 3.9 -- J - - 4.4 5.5 6.5 6.9 6-9 6.4 5.3 4.0 2.8 1.$ 6.2 6.9 6.8 6A 5.9 5.3 4.2 3-3 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.6 2A 2.3 2.6 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.9 2Y 2A 2.5 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.2 3-0 2.9 3-1 3.6 4.7 5.5 6.1 6.7 6.6 6.0 5.1 4.0 2.6 1.5 1 6.3 7.0 6-9 6.5 5.8 5,0 4.3 4-1 4-2 4.5 4.7 4,5 4,1 3-7 3.4 3.4 3.7 4.1 4-5 4.6 4,5 4.0 3,6 3.4 3-5 3.7 4.2 4.5 4.6 4-4 4.1 4,0 4.3 4.8 5.6 6-3 6.7 6.7 6-1 5.0 3s 2.5 1.5 6.5 7-0 7,0 6.7 5.8 5-1 4.8 4.8 5.3 5.7 5.8 57 5,4 4.7 4-3 4,3 4-6 5-2 5.6 5-7 5.6 52 14.5 4.3 4.3 4-8 5.4 5-7 5.8 5.7 5.2 4.8 4,8 5.1 5-9 6-6 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.2 3-8 2.5 1.5 2-5 3.8 5.2 6.5 7.D 7.q 6.7 6.1 5.4 5.1 5A 6-0 6.4 6.6 6,4 6.:1 5.5 4.9 4.9 5.4 519 6.4 6-5 6.3 5.9 5.3 4.8 5-0 5.5 6.1 6.5 6.6 6.3 5.9 5.4 5.1 5.4 6.2 6.7 7-0 6.8 63- 5.4 3.9 2.6 1,5 2.8 4.0 5.5 6A 7 R AJ.4 6.7 6.2 5.6 5.3 5.7 ' 6.2 6.8 '%17.0 6.3 5.8 5.3 5.2 5.8 6.3 6.9 17A1 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.2 5.3 5.9 6.4 7.2 0 ►X$ 6.7 6.2 5.6 5.3 5.7 6.3 6.7 7.!' A1.3 6.3 5.4 3.9 2.6 1.5 2.9 4.1 5.5 6.4 7.0 MH: 7.0 9.75 6.7 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.8 6.4 6.8 MH: 9.75 7A 6.9 6.5 5.9 5.3 5.3 5.8 6.5 6.9 MH: 9.75 7 6.8 6.4 5A 5.3 5A 6.0 6.6 7.0 MH: 7.1 9.75 6.8 6.3 5.7 5.3 5.6 6.3 6.7 7.0 MH: 6.9 9.75 6.3 5.3 3.8 2.6 1.5 A 2.8 3.9 5.3 6.4 6.8 6.9 6.6 6.0 5.4 5.2 5.5 6.3 6.9 7.0 7.0 6.5 5.7 5.3 5.2 5.6 6.4 6.9 7.0 6.9 6.3 5.6 5.2 5.3 5.8 6.6 7.0 7.0 6.8 6.2 5.5 5.3 5.4 6.0 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.3 5.1 3.7 2.5 1.5 2.8 3.9 5.1 6.2 6.7 6.8 6.4 5.8 5.3 5.2 5.4 6.1 6.7 7.0 6.8 6.4 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.5 6.2 6.8 7.0 6.7 6.2 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.7 6.4 6.9 7.0 6.7 6.1 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.9 6.5 6.8 6.7 6A 5.0 3.7 2.4 1.4 2.8 4.0 5.1 6.0 6.6 6.6 6.3 5.8 5.3 5.1 5.5 6.0 6.5 6.9 6.7 6.2 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.1 6.6 6.9 6.5 6.1 5.6 5.1 5.3 5.8 6.3 6.8 6.9 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.1 5.4 5.8 6.3 6.7 6.5 5.9 5.0 3.8 2A 1 A 2.8 3-9 5.2 6.2 6.8 6.9 6.5 5.8 5.3 5.2 5A 6.2 6.8 7.1 7.0 6.5 5.7 5.2 5.2 5.6 6.4 6.9 7A 6.9 6.3 5.5 5.2 5.3 5.8 6.5 7.0 7.1 6.8 6A 5.4 5.2 5.3 5.9 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.2 5.0 3.7 2.5 1 A 2.8 4-0 5-3 6-3 6.8 6-8 6.6 6-0 5-3 5-3 5-6 6-4 6-8 '7-0 6-9 6.6 5.9 5-3 5-3 5-8 6-5 6-9 7A 6-9 6-4 5.7 5-3 5.4 5-9 6-7 7-0 7-0 6-8 6-3 5.6 5.3 5-5 6-2 6.7 6-9 6-7 6-3 . 5-2 3-8 2.5 '1-5 2-9 4.1 5-4 6-3 7.7 7-1 6.5 6.1 5.5 533 5-7 6-4 6-8 7-5 7-1 6.5 6-0 5-4 5.4 5-9 5.5 7-D 7-5 6.9 6.4 5.8 5-3 5-5 6-0 6.6 7-2 7.4 6-8 6-3 5-7 5-3 5.7 6-3 6-7 7-3 7.1 6-3 5.4 3.9 2-6 1.5 2-8 4.0 5-3 6.1 °►�'I 7.1 6.0 5.4 5.1 5-5 6-2 6.7 °A1 7-4MF rJ.7�4 5.8 5.3 5.z 5.8 6-3 6-9 °A1 711�H:�9'756.3 5,7 5,2 5-3 5-9 6.4 �Ay1,� 7.1 6.2 5.6 5,3 5.6 5.2 6-7 °A�^ 7-3 5-3 3.9 2.6 1.5 M �.�� lY�fl: 5 M g. 2.6 3.6 5.0 5.9 6.3 6.4 6A 5.6 4.9 4.8 5.1 5.9 6.3 6.5 6.5 6.1 5A 4.8 4.8 5.3 6.0 6A 6.6 6A &0 5.2 4.8 4.9 5.5 6.2 6.5 6.5 6.4 5.9 5.2 5.0 5.2 6.1 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.3 5.2 18 2.5 1.5 2.3 3.2 4.3 5.4 5.8 5.8 5.4 4.7 4.2 4.2 4.3 5.0 5.6 6.D 5.9 5.3 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.5 5.2 5.9 6.0 5.9 5.3 4.5 4.2 4.3 4.8 5.5 6.0 6.0 5.8 13 4.4 4.6 4A 5.7 6.5 6.8 6.7 6.2 5.0 3.7 2A 1.4 2.9 4.0 4.7 5.5 6.1 6.6 6.5 5.9 4.9 18 2.4 IIA 1.6 3.2 4.4 5.4 6.2 6.7 6.6 5.9 4.9 3.7 2A 1.4 1.5 2.6 4.1 5.4 6.4 6.8 6.7 6.2 5.1 3.6 2.5 1.4 1.5 2.6 4.0 5.6 6A 6.9 6.8 6.2 5.3 3.8 2.5 1.4 1.5 2.6 4.0 5.4 6.4 7.9' A1.3 6.3 5.3 3.8 2A 1A AIlH- 9.75 1.3 2A 18 5.3 6.3 6A 6.9 6.2 5.2 3.6 2.3 1.3 4 5 6 ONESTOP I b] *-q I La Lm ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530 WILSHIRE BLVE #310 LOS ANGELES CA 90010 PROPRIETARY NOTICE: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT INCORPORATES PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF ONE STOP - DESIGN. ANY PARTY ACCEPTING THIS DOCUMENT DOES SO IN CONFIDENCE AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED IN WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF ONE STOP DESIGN. COPYRIGHT ONE STOP DESIGN 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. CONTRACTOR NOTICE: CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL JOB SITE CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY OWNER OF ANY DISCREPENCIES WITH THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 /05/21 ISSUE MARK I DATE DESCRIPTION SCALE AS INDICATED PROJECT NUMBER DATE SHEET NAME PROJECT ARCHITECT T.B.D OSD-21-02 10/15/21 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - GARAGE P3 SHEET NUMBER P105 C B i .1 1 ... "i ■■ ! 1 :RN / / NN PROPOSED �..: 1 CD -:: - � FS .. 18.61 PROPOSED m Lij FS PROPOSED RIGHI - VOOFF DEDICATION , EQUIPMENT PROPOSED FIRE HYDRI NT. IL ■ �jCD .■ PROPOSED 0 fr + r. GRIND & OVERLAY DOMESTIC WATEROP METER & BFP PROP R/W r EXISTING POWER POLE TO BE REMOVED (TYP) 1 7 i, ! '1 ! : 1 '! 1 ! ! 1 RECORDED 1'. �� .._.IN BOOK 4, PAGE 238-239 �Fw — 14,79TC�n0 PROP INTERNAL DOUBLE P I OP LANDSCAPE w 14, w9FL DETECTOR CHECK VALVES {DCDA} WATER METER J PROP WALL MOUNTED FIRE g m A 3Of 2 hI 10 0,3, A DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) 15 u I 13' 7' s°r° a 15.2$FS W o PROP KNOX BOX PROP IRRIGATION BFP [~j} EXISTING POWER POLE TO BE REMOVED (TYP) (OVERHEAD LINE TO BE UNDER GROUNDED) Ln o12.21 TC _ CJ 11,71FL � LLI 12.58 FS PROPOSED TREEWELL 11.98 - - - FF FS PROPOSED 30' DRIVE APPROACH PER F I _ .11.87FS CITY OF TEMECULA STD 207A I f,DJ O"CF SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4 FOR 1 9°r ELEVATIONS SS I .84FS 10.95 0#CF FF/FS PROPOSED PUBLIC 10.16 SIDEWALK 09.98T :.. FS w 09.48E -7.9%V -1_9°/° 10.35 ■�' �� PROPOSED "CA FS Q CURB & �r GUTTER PER 10.14 CITY STD. 202 - - FF/FS 10.04 FS 5 z 9.01 10.05 N45'31'05"W 150,11' Q S FSLu PROPOSED SCREEN e'�G 4��z ILl W EXISTING POWER POLE WALL J ova ` f 8.43TC 08,62 TO BE REMOVED (TYP) BONING: SPECIFIC PLAN (SF-5) Lu �`��•� 7.95FL} IFS OVERHEAD LINE TO BE LAND USE. SPECIFIC PLAN 1,° 1pr�' Q� I I �` I UNDER GROUNDED} IMPLEMENATION (SPD 1ERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 SCALE 1"=20' D 19 29 41Y GRAPHIC SCALE � -� T/Ave EG 18.83FS 19.03EG 18.98FS 18.98 EXISTING FENCE TO BE a FS PROTECTED IN PLACE18.0 a 18 98FSG o� o � PROPOSED 30' DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY OF �. 18.98FS 18.98FS 1% PROPOSED ALLEY/FIRELANE PROPOSED 12" HDPE PRIVATE STORM DRAIN I I PAD ELEVATIONS P1 = 1007.00' BO.5 = 1002.50' B 1 = 997.00' B 1.5 = 992.00' TEMECULA STD 207A 13.44 FS 13.441 PROPOSED DROP INLET FS IN RIBBON GUTTER 13.29FS 0"CF PROPOSED 12.f TREEWELL �I PROPOSED 30' DRIVE APPROACH PER CITY OF TEMECULA STD 207A SEE SECTION ON SHEET 4 FOR ELEVATIONS PROPOSED PUBLIC FIRE HYDRANT FS (I 4.93EG DRAINAGE OVERFLOW • PROPOSED 1'1' INLET RIGHT-OF-WAY TO CAPTURE CALTRANS DRAINAGE INMEN11 100111 \� SKr%/'fig! 0. . m FW nj — Fw — Fw � - I �016- PROPOSED DCDA, PH AND FDC .EASEMENT LIMITS o TERMINATE AT BLDG FACE PROPOSED DOMESTIC WATER METER & BFP PROPOSED LANDSCAPE WATER METER & BFP RCWD UTILITY LOCATION DETAIL 11,24 T FF/FS F � a e o 09.89 FF/FS z 00 Q 09.21 - FS i 09.4 FF/F 09.37 FS � a�9 09.47 FF/FS 08.26 10.1 ' FF FS 07.47 i ° 09.41 PROPOSED PUBLIC FS TG PROPOSED 5% MAX SIDEWALK 09.34 FEMA ZONE "X" TG SLOPED WALKWAY „ SHADED " PROPOSED �� FEMA ZONE X SCREEN WALL 0-1 N I SEE SHEET CG-2 FOR CONTINUATION EASEMENT NOTES EXISTING EASEMENTS AN EASEMENT FOR POLE LINES, CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA, RECORDED 05/30/1990 AS INST NO. 90-195837, O.R. (2) AN EASEMENT FOR SIGN, ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF ADAMS ADVERTISING, RECORDED 08/14/1989 AS INST. NO, 89-274094, O.R. AN EASEMENT FOR POLES AND ANCHORS IN FAVOR OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, RECORDED 09/21/1917 AS BOOK 470, PAGE 14, OF DEEDS **NOT PLOTTABLE** AN EASEMENT FOR POLES IN FAVOR OF THE SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, RECORDED 06/29/1922 AS BOOK 571, PAGE 157, OF DEEDS "NOT PLOTTABLE" PROPOSED EASEMENTS q) AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES PROPOSED 18" RCP PUBLIC STORM DRAIN LATERAL r� C:) E1 a Lu p FI Q 1a Y 1O�g .rya IMIN MEN' Azl LEGEND �I Z EXISTING AC Z PAVEMENT 5 I� 2 �= LLl U)DLQ PROPOSED 24" RCP z PUBLIC STORM DRAIN MAIN IMPERVIOUS PCC PAVEMENT ,� IMPERVIOUS AC PAVEMENT IMPERVIOUS AC GRIND & OVERLAY �■ CATCH BASIN BLOCK WALL SHEET G-3 & G-4 NOTESEE . FOR CROSS - SECTIONS OWNER STEVE Y. KIM LIVING TRUST 3785 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #2211 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 ATTN: MR. STEVE KIM CIVIL ENGINEER VALUED ENGINEERING, INC 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, SUITE C102 UPLAND, CA 91786 PHONE: (909) 982-4601 ATTN: MR. JEFF MEITER EARTHWORK RAW EXCAVATION: 27,400 CY RAW IMPORT: 5,200 CY IMPORT/EXPORT: 22,200 CY SCALE: 1 "=10' LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, MAP OF TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES STREET. PROJECT LOCATION APNS: 922-072-005, --007, -010, -011, --013, -016, -018, -020, -021 & -023 ADDRESS: NE CORNER OF FRONT STREET AND FIRST STREET, TEMECULA, CA GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION LAND USE DESIGNATION � DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY TWO WORKNG DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS ACC ❑ DATE BENCH MARK SEAL: Designed 9y Drawn By Checked 9y y Drawing No. SCALE E� 5�� DH JH JDM �•�r �� LA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contractor ,y RECOMMENDED BY. DALE.' Horizontal ; t� F� Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of m �, ACCEPTED BY. DATE.• C �] - Inspector x "'DNo.646s6 PAMICK 7NOMAS, PE PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN DIRECTOR OF PU&IC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER Date Completed Yerfical �y3� CIVIL �� / ENEANHERING,1W Date R.C.E. N. 44223 r£ CIVIL ENGINEERING ■ LAND SURVEYING ■ LAND PLANNING TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA Of nw-N 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C102. UPLAND. CA 91786 r-� 64696 PA22-6035 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SUBMITTAL #G Sheet 1 °f 4 PHONE: (909) 982-4601 I�l.I..E NO. SEE SHEET CG-1 FOR CONTINUATION SCALE 1"=20' 0 10, 20' 40' GRAPHIC SCALE �ERGROUND SERVICE ALERT CALL TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY Contractor Inspector Date Completed SS SS SS SS PER CITY STD. NO. 202 CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK PER - OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN_ OLD TOWN FRONT STREET W W W W W W VV 5S SS c.c SS 55 SS SS — S5 SS 55 SS 55 SS = � = V ; tin LEGEND IMPERVIOUS PCC PAVEMENT IMPERVIOUS AC PAVEMENT IMPERVIOUS AC GRIND & OVERLAY 0 CATCH BASIN ® BLOCK WALL NOTE,SEE SHEET & FOR CROSS C -SECTIONS c-4 RECISIONS ACC D I DATE BENCH MARK SCALE SEAL: I?-FESSIp Horizontal w' rrt n N,,.64696 x Vertical Designed By Drawn By Checked By DH JH JDM Plans Prepored Under Supervision Of Date CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C102, UPLAND. CA 91786 64696 PHONE: (909) 982-4601 1 C.E No. RECOMMENDED BY. DATE., ACCEPTED BY. DATE.- PATRICK TNOMAS; P.E. DIRECTOR OF PU&IC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER R. G E No. 44223 I EXISTING AC I PAVEMENT PROPOSED 24" RCP PUBLIC STORM DRAIN MAIN C/TYCiF TEAVEC"l&14 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA PA22-0035 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 Drawing No. CG-2 Sheet 2 of 4 1025 1020 1015 KK SECTION A 1 "=20' 1 "= 4' 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 PROPC SCREEN V 1010 1005 iir 995 z SECTION B 1 20' IUD 105 105 104 104 1 FL 103 103 1�6 FLO( 102 1�1 0 FL00 SECTION C 1 "=20' 1 "=4' 1025 - IIIIIIIIIII1114 I I I I � ! IIl� �!! li•! ! I I �I� � IIIIIIIIIII 1='"'�''"'��'��111ii 1�1� IIII I I I I �3l��IIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllilllllll - ■ _ 1111�11111111111111illlll _ 1 I111% 111111111111111 Ili 11111111IN IIIIIIIIIIIII II1111 �■ �� III IIIGROUND IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIlllliiililllll 1 "=20' 1 "-4" 1020 , 1015 - - - 1015 1015 1011 R/W : RAW P/L 10 30,d_ I . CD 5' EXISTING 20 2, "I - BUILDING I... LO 1,, __, _. . . ......... .. a_ - L_j 1015 PROPOSED o 1010 --WALL :_ 1010 aLLJ 1010 LO GREEN WALL -. 1006.50 . 1006.50 f � PROPOSED a 3 GRANQ 1006.50 a `=' 20' 10' a BANQUETtI I SCREEN WALL._ o BALLROOM RESTAURANT ; LOUNGE EXISTING AC 3 0 I! - ° - ° - PAVEMENT �� 0- EXISTING 3q 2% STING A `r' z. C xI_JJJJJ1J11 1010 1005- 1005 - 2,0% _ 1_L�1��+1; 1005 EtvIENT WALL �: i % 1 a08.O Ex15TiNG -1 - — 4 `d~ �2%} 2.0% __ FLOOR GROUNI? 2' GRIND X15TIN.:..�° . . & OVERLA E � PROP05EQ CURB & Ila fl "C" CURB & GUTTER GUTTER XI IN ExIST1N�Iflflflltjflflfl G CURB QROUN UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 1005 1000 1000 1000 SECTION E SECTION F SECTION G SECTION H CALL TOLL FREE 1 "=20' 1 "=20' 1 "=20' 1 "=20' I-800-422-4133 1 „_ 4, 1 4 1 �, _ 4 1 4 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REW'SIONS ACC D DATE BENCH MARK SEAL: Designed By Drawn By Checked By Drawing No. SCALE a �ROf E55fp�1 CITY 40i� TEMWC"UL.4' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contractor �F't D, to DH JH JDM RECOMMENDED BY.- DALE.' Horizontol u, t� t"� Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of ACCEPTED BY.- DATE.' CROSS SECTIONS rrI�� U C G -3 �o,fi459fi �I D PATRICO THOMAS, P.E. Inspector a "' j ve�icaJ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER Date Completed ' ,91 cIW1L / 1YING; AND PLANNING Date R.C.E. No. 44223 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING F ❑F CAM-_ 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C102. UPLAND. CA 91786 �+ p� 64696 � PA22-0035 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 Sheet 3 of 4 PHONE: (909) 982--46O1 IVY. DATE I BY I REVISIONS ACC'D DATE PC RESOLUTION NO.2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0037, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM 38349) TO COMBINE TEN EXISTING LOTS INTO A SINGLE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0035 a Development Plan. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0037 a Tentative Parcel Map. These applications (collectively "Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. On September 6, 2023, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on May 15, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0037, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Parcel Map (Development Code Section 16.03.140): A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Parcel Map No. 38349 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, the Municipal Code, and the Old Town Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land, and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property that is suitable and designated for commercial development, which is consistent with the allowable land uses of the Old Town Specific Plan, General Plan, and Development Code. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would combine ten existing lots into a single lot. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property and does not propose any grading, construction or development. As conditioned, the project is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat as the project site is vacant undeveloped land. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure compliance with the Building, Development, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions to ensure projects do not cause serious public health problems. Negative impacts are not anticipated. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All required rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). This map is for non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In -Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 38349) to combine ten individual parcels into a single parcel located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plan Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of May, 2024. Bob Hagel, Chair ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of May, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA22-0037 Project Description: ATentative Parcel Map (No. 38349) to combine ten (10) existing lots into a single lot located on the east side of Front Street between 1st Street and 2nd Street Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-072-005 922-072-007 922-072-010 922-072-011 922-072-013 922-072-016 922-072-018 922-072-020 922-072-021 922-072-023 MSHCP Category: N/A (no new grading) DIF Category: N/A (no additional square footage) TUMF Category: N/A (no additional square footage) Quimby Category: N/A (non-residential) New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (no additional square footage) Approval Date: May 15, 2024 Expiration Date: May 15, 2027 PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 4 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. General Requirements 2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Page 2 of 4 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5). 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. Subdivision Map Act. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and Temecula Municipal Code, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 8. Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 9. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. This project is within a 100-year Flood Hazard Zone. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. d. This project is within a Subsidence Zone. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 10. Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Final Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. Final Map shall include: a. Right -of -Way Vacation (Old Town Front Street) b. Right -of -Way Dedication (Second Street) 11. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 12. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 13. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. Page 3 of 4 14. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Final or Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 15. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Caltrans; b. Rancho California Water District; c. Eastern Municipal Water District 16. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 17. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 18. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City's GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. Page 4 of 4 MAP OF TEM CUL A I BLOCK 29 I I I APN 922-046-028 I SCALE 1"=30' 15' 30' 60, GRAPHIC SCALE R/W PARCEL MAP N0. -374-46 P.M,B 246/50-53 PARCEL 1 APN 922-073-026 PROPOSED R/W PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY TO BE VACATED PER FINAL PARCEL MAP APN 922-010-031 1 I 1 APN 922-043-026 APN 9221043-010 I APN 922-043-016 1 i I I SEARCHED FOR, FOUND NOTHING ESTABLISHED PER CR 17-0040 — I— I I w w I^ I �i C14 0 CD L C Z a Io ❑1 0C) +� ❑ z ,� R/W ri ❑ co �I O Il z Y� SEARCHED FOR, -FOUND NOTHING ESTABLISHED PER CR 17--0039 1 1 1 1 SECOND STREET _ N44'28'35"E 4 00.59'� (BASIS OF BEARINGS) (470.59') — 210.30' (210.31') I i v /Ot APN 922 072-022 I I I ZONING-. OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) P L LAND U$E: SPECIFIC PLAN / IMPLE:MENATION i(SPI) I I I � N44'30'16"E 335.46' (335.46') FIRST STREET N44'30'16"E 368,85' R/W APN 922-075-001 MAP Or TEMECULA P ORT101\1 BLOCK 16 I LU I LU APN 922-043-027 U U) R/W w LU ❑I w a FOUND 1" IP TAGGED "RCE21914" DOWN 0.1' PER RS 71/1 C7 o n C� EXISTING al I I I , , I I I I I DAM. O 1 /2O-22 PARCEL 2 / I I / 30' MERCEDES STREET VACATION RECORDED 05/20/1980 AS o INST. 54902, O.R. / [V / 0 N / CALTRANS R/W z P /L / / MERCEDES STREET VACATION RECORDED 05/20/1980 AS INST. NO. 54902, O.R. PARCEL "8" I /YA 1CALTRANS R/W DOC. NO. 2021 RECORDED 06/23/1948 <(/� —0529909, O.R. / L AS INST. 3269, O.R. 1I �� RECORDED 72/04/1967 �.� AS INST. 105961, O.R. / RECORDED 07/12/1973 / AS INST. 73-90987, O.R. z ACCESS RIGHTS Z / RESTRICTED PER INST. 94502, O.R. RECORDED 05/20/1980 E-- FOUND 1" IP TAGGED "RIV. CO. SURVEY R/W" UP 0.2' PER RS 71/1 SEARCHED FOR FOUND NOTHING 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL NIAP NOO 38349 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, TOWN OF TEMECULA AND BLOCK 17 VACATED ALLEYWAY AND PORTIONS OF FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES STREET (VACATED) PER M.B. 15/726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PROJECT FIRST STREET LOCATION VICINITY MAP 15 NOT TO SCALE r�MECUTA PARKWAY OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION STEVE Y. KIM LIVING TRUST LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, MAP OF 3785 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #2211 TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ATTN: MR. STEVE KIM COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES CIVIL ENGINEER STREET. VALUED ENGINEERING, INC 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, SUITE C102 PROJECT LOCATION UPLAND, CA 91786 PHONE: (909) 982-4601 APNS: 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, ATTN: MR. JEFF MEITER -016, -018, -020, -021 & -023 ADDRESS: NE CORNER OF FRONT STREET AND FIRST STREET, TEMECULA, CA ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN (SP5) DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY SITE SUMMARY GROSS ACREAGE: 2.136 ACRES GENERAL PLAN STREET DEDICATION: -0.013 ACRES SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STREET VACATION: +0.024 ACRES NET ACREAGE: 2.146 ACRES SURVEYOR'S NOTES # OF PARCELS: 1 (XXX.XX') RECORD INFORMATION PER RS 71/1 [XXX.XX'] RECORD INFORMATION PER RS 112/23 SURVEYOR'S NOTES EXISTING EASEMENTS 0 AN EASEMENT FOR POLE LINES, CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA, RECORDED 05/30/1990 AS INST NO. 90-195837, O.R. 02 AN EASEMENT FOR SIGN, ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF ADAMS ADVERTISING, RECORDED 08/14/1989 AS INST. NO. 89-274094, O.R. 03 AN EASEMENT FOR POLES AND ANCHORS IN FAVOR OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, RECORDED 09/21/1917 AS BOOK 470, PAGE 14, OF DEEDS **NOT PLOTTABLE** ® AN EASEMENT FOR POLES IN FAVOR OF THE SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, RECORDED 06/29/1922 AS BOOK 571, PAGE 157, OF DEEDS **NOT PLOTTABLE** PROPOSED EASEMENTS DA AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES © AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES BASIS OF BEARINGS THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND STREET, SHOWN AS NORTH 44'28'35" EAST ON R.S. 71/1, WAS USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER NATURAL GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SERVICE 42135 WINCHESTER ROAD SERVICE 962 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE TEMECULA, CA 92590 ONTARIO, CA 91762 (951) 296-6900 (800) 427-2200 SEWER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TELEPHONE FRONTIER SERVICE 2270 TRUMBLE ROAD SERVICE 280 S. LOCUST STREET PERRIS, CA 92570 POMONA, CA 91766 (951) 928-3777 (909) 397-0042 ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORINA EDISON COMPANY CABLE TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 24487 PRELIPP ROAD TELEVISION 212 S. INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD WILDOMAR, CA 92595 SERVICE CLAREMONT, CA 91711 (800) 611-1911 (800) 892-4357 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 0 CALL TOLL FREE I-800-422-4133 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS ACC D DATE BENCH MARK SEAL: Designed By Drawn By Checked By Drawing No. SCALE OFE551p�1 C/TYO� TE/I�EC"UL.4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contractor ��ck'w DH JH JDM RECOMMENDED BY.' DATE: I�orizor+tal u, t� t"� Plans Prepared Under Supervision Of Inspector M I ACCEPTED BY' DATE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38349 TPM-1 A �o.fi46gs , I �I PATRICO THOMAS, P.E. PARCELS AND EASEMENTS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER uerticaJ �, �� r Iv��- ' Dote R.C.E. No. 44223 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA Date Completed C CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING OF `{ ` .r • 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C1aa. UPLAND. CA 9178fi "�' I�I�nNE: (gas) gsz--ksa1 R.C.Q. IVo. 64696 PA22-0037 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 Sheet of 3 NIA/ F OF TEMECULA BLOCK 29 APN 922-046-028 +�+ I �I I 1 � I 1�+�`•� 1 1 I f I + + I a� 1 I I PARCEL MAP NO. 3600a 1 _ k�2 , I P,M,B 2 �1/83--84 � r'� � I �lAP OF rr �IJFCULA I II APN 922-043-026 BLOCK 1 a FA R C E L '1 I `' W AP N 922 ;043_ 010 1 APN 922�043-016 1 APN 922-043-027 I 1 W I �/ I I I EXISTING I + EXISTING J J TREE (TYP) TREE (TYP) 0-4x ,' U) ! I I 2�¢ R/W W a ❑ _mac _ j - EXISTING EXISTING -- EXISTING ` -- EXISTING _ o -1 FH ❑ DRIVE i W r I -r_..APPROACH - APPROACH14 FH� n �- i 1 pig _ C .1�IJ. u 1 120—?2 / SEARCHED FOR, FOUND NOTHING r I I/ n I I I c� F RC r L / FOUND 1 IP TAGGED RCE2i 9i 4 ESTABLISHED PER CR 17-0040 " / SECOND STREET DOWN 0.1' PER RS 71/1 1 I SCALE 1"=30' S5 S5 iSS SS\ SS �- S5 55 N44'2$'35"E 470.59�j 15' 30' 60' � (BASIS OF BEARINGS) (470.59') \ \ •.- b CD / o EXISTING / GRAPHIC SCALE ~� f' TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38349 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, TOWN OF TEMECULA AND BLOCK 17 VACATED ALLEYWAY AND PORTIONS OF FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES STREET (VACATED) PER M.B. 15/726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD �0 (' PROJECT FIRST STREET LOCATION f R/W / I — :— _ / / 1 VICINITY MAP 15 �Z10,30'i (210.31') �, [] DR VE 230.30' .- .A 1 // // I NOT TO SCALE �I FT17 1, 1 44 EE I i R/w' ` 1 i I� I I I �TEME I In `n + y `t. EX15TING I I 8 I 11 1 r I / I l OWNER CV �A PARKWAY i I i I RETAINING PROPOSED STEVE Y. KIM LIVING TRUST WALL i- w IWO, 0'� 1 R/ I i 30' MERCEDES r / 3785 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #2211 h I CNING: ,OLD TOWN SPECIFIC ;PLAN c S -+5) i � � L_n � � I I I STREET VACATION ' / LOS ANGELES CA 90010 LEGAL DESCRIPTION I LAND USE: SPECIFIC FLAN } I I I RECORDED ' I a, J1 IMPLEMENATION IS + I3 T I, t I 5' 1 / ATTN: MR. STEVE KIM LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, MAP OF 0I2011980 AS TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF �Q,� o INST. 54902, O.R. 1 / SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, III CIVIL ENGINEER COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, I n1� ti� t,�� 6� 1 �� 15' 2 I + + % VALUED ENGINEERING, INC INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND W ,' -- I PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES I w � I � � �. � - � l I I � / 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, SUITE C102 w rn o _Uy 1 i I �� + I � / UPLAND, CA 91786 STREET. "' I 1 f I DOC. NO. 2021 I '�'� I I I 1 I I 'CN � I CALTRANS R/W ' �' / PHONE: (909) 982-4601 I R.S. 71 /01 P/L o I DOC. NO. 2021 I q I I 0562667, 0.R• I ujk, _-0562667, 0•R• 1 1 } 1 / ATTN: MR. JEFF MEITER R/W z �� ! APN 922-072-022�� r ; I DOc. N0. 2 1 r I PIL I / / PROJECT LOCATION 4 J 007, 010, 011, 013, I p re)� � R/W z � � .. � � I � f l I-0562667, I I 1 � / APNS: 922 072 005, z ! I I i I w 1 - 1 -018 -020 -021 & -023 ZONING -016, , "' -- - ---- - - -- �- I SPECIFIC PLAN (SP5) DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY ADDRESS: NE CORNER OF FRONT STREET AND FIRST PARCEL MAP N O , � 74 1 8 �; � I I I � � 1 � � � I I � z � � 1 I35' STREET, TEMECULA, CA P,M.B I I �� I � � P/L � � i � � ' i ,� �__ --! � � ��...� , I � I � � 1 � � 1 1 GENERAL PLANT PARCEL CC, r I "' i -d _ �_ _ _ / -� SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION SITE SUMMARY PARC�� 1 4 I_ _l -� EXISTING ' ' j APN 922-073-026 1_ 1 / GROSS ACREAGE: 2,136 ACRES 1 N44'29'2fi»E 1210-35' (214.34') ' I i / 1 SIGN TO STREET DEDICATION: -0.013 ACRES 10 20 20'10 REMAIN / SURVEYORS NOTES STREET VACATION: +0.024 ACRES 30' 1 30' I I I I (XXX.XX') RECORD INFORMATION PER RS 7111 NET ACREAGE: 2,146 ACRES 1 MAP �PF TrJ IJrCUL A 2O ALLEYWAY VACATI N � � ' OF PARCELS: 1 1I r 1 r 1 MERCEDES ; [XXX.XX ] RECORD INFORMATION PER R5 112/23 # DOC. N0. 2021 I n I I STREET VACATION 1-0529909, O.R. rJIL�}Cr o RECORDEDIN BOOK f, 1 RECORDED 1 I r� , i l 4, PAGE 238-239 1 / 1 7 _ -rk1�11.B, 1 %7u v I l l 1 1 �� ° I INST25490$. OR. ' ' SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1 10' FRONT STREET a 1 11 1 I I EXISTING EASEMENTS cn I VA4�23�1975 RECORDED ED I I'� PARCEL f ll + }� I �, 1. 1❑ AN EASEMENT FOR POLE LINES, CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN 1 �, NST. 75-046491, O.R. I �1 FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA, RECORDED 05/30/1990 AS INST N0. 90-195837, O.R. 1 ,- � / � / 2 C. NO 2021 I �. O AN EASEMENT FOR SIGN, ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF ADAMS ADVERTISING, RECORDED cn � � rt� '� �� C� �'� 1� I f , \p 1 0529909, O' ./ �-;°� CALTRANS R/W g33� 08/14/1989 AS INST, NO. 89-274094, O.R. EXISTING rn Q� �. � �� I ; �� 1 I I ��. RECORDED 06/23/1948 46 03 AN EASEMENT FOR POLES AND ANCHORS IN FAVOR OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, OVERHEAD I �, , Q �, �C� C] � Q I AS INST. 3269, O.R. RECORDED 09/21/1917 AS BOOK 470, PAGE 14, OF DEEDS "NOT PLOTTABLE** RECORDED 12/04/1967 I I j J I h AS INST, 105961, O.R. ® AN EASEMENT FOR POLES IN FAVOR OF THE SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, RECORDED 06/29/1922 LAND DEDICATED I DOC. N0. 2021 DOC. N0. 2021 DOC. NO. 2021 ' DOC. NO. 2021 I I I RECORDED 07 i 2 1973 G3 ** ** 1 BY FINAL ORDER-05299' 9, O.R. 1-05299Q9, O.R. I-0529909, O.R. I-05299,09, O.R. I / AS INST. 73-9a987, O.R. Y' AS BOOK 571, PAGE 157, OF DEEDS NOT PLOTTABLE ! OF CONDEMNATION14 PORTION OF PUBLIC REC. 3/4-/1998 AS f 1 / '� PROPOSED EASEMENTS RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED I INST. 98-075563, O.R. PER FINAL PA n I PROPOSED / z 0 AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES L PARCEL MAP I TREE (TYP) I I 1 y �q7 © AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES EXISH ` -1,9- 3 I , I I PROPpSEQ I 6 R/W RIVE 5 1 ' �' RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS INST. BASIS OF BEARINGS , APPR ACH �, � 94502, O.R. RECORDED » 317.63 �- 05 20 REC THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND STREET, SHOWN AS NORTH 44.28'35 EAST ON R.S. 71/1, WAS USED AS THE / / BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. cnl it N44'30'16"E 355.54' (355.46') a i l �� FOUND 1" IP TAGGED 7n _ Sp $ 1 rn SD - �; FOUND CO. SURVEY R/W" + 'y"' - - UP 0.2' PER RS 71/1 UTILITY PURVEYORS r a WA TER GAS COMPANY FIRST STREET SERVICE RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 42135 WINCHESTER ROAD 962 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE - 55 SS SEARCHED FOR, FOUND NOTHING �. , , � N44'30'16"E � 68.85 � ,� SEARCHED FOR TEMECULA, CA 92590 ONTARIO, CA 91762 TABLISHED PER CR 17-0039 I (951) 296-6900 (800) 427-2200 ��,` o a FOUND NOTHING SS --� 5 - 55 SS SSA t SS �- SS a - 5�5 ' 1 ' ' SEWER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TELEPHONE FRONTIER EXISTING �� __ ") ` ' SERVICE 2270 TRUMBLE ROAD SERVICE 280 S. LOCUST STREET EXISTING - - - - EXISTING a - ` ' ' PERRIS, CA 92570 POMONA, CA 91766 '1 APPROACH APPROACH ' ' (951) 928-3777 (909) 397-0042 ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORINA EDISON COMPANY CABLE TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS 1 R/W // - �' �J ' ' ' SERVICE 24487 PRELIPP ROAD TELEVISION 212 S. INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD �� / • _ ss ' WILDOMAR, CA 92595 SERVICE CLAREMONT, CA 91711 APN 922-010-031 , l l� r r - ' ' ' (800) 611-1911 (800) 892-4357 l , / 1�Ilr�r' Or T�.1�IlrCUTA ' �� ' PORTION BLOCK 16 R/W R/W R/W R/W 30' 30' 30' 30' 1 10' 20' 20' 10' 10' 20' 20' 10' APN 922-075--001 •-''� / , ' ' � �� I 13' 7' l S EXIST EXISTING PROP. , , PROP. PROPOSED EXISTING EXIST. , S/W AC PAVEMENT EXISTING S/W S/W AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT S/W � I AC PVMT a � I - - - - - - - - 2� 2.0 L_.. I I 2 GRIND 2' GRIND � t 1 / " PROPOSED "C" & OVERLAY " ' EXISTING 6 & OVERLAY PROPOSED "C» EXISTING 6 ' I CURB & GUTTER CURB &GUTTER CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER 2ND STREET TYPICAL SECTION 1 ST STREET TYP CAL SECTION NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE CONS TRUCF/ON RECORD DATE BY REIdSIONS ACC D DATE BENCH MARK SEAL: Designed By Drawn By Checked By Drawing No. SCALE BEY 5� �'�'q� � DH J H J pM CITY D� TE/IIEC"UL.� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contractor RECOMMENDED BY. OATE.- Horrzontal ; tt. Plops Prepared Under Supervision Of Inspector M M E ACCEPFED BY: DATE- TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38349TPM-1 B No.64696 ' D 01RECOPATRICK TIOFP PF EXHIBIT B DIRECTQR OF PUBLIC WORKS /CITY ENGINEER Date Completed vertrcat �� O/ V Iv ENGINEERING, - LAND IPI6, INC pafa R c. E. Na. 44223 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA CIVIL ENGINEERING •LAND SURVEYING •LAND PLANNING ••.::,.r; 2 3 OF- CAL\ 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C102, UPLAND. CA 91786 �j p� 64696 PA22-0037 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 Sheet of PHONE: (909) 982--4601 R. C. E. I V�. I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 TENTATIVE PARCEL BLOCK �' � I PARCEL MAP 1\1J . 36008 38349 I I I 1° APN 922-043-026 1\/1�� OF r r\il E�C UA P,M,B 234/83-84 MAP / NO. r� �L OCr� APN 922-043-010 I APN 922-043-016 I APN 922-_ _ 27 1 LU I I BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK I I APN 922-043 0 APN 922-046-028 I I I I 17, TOWN OF TEMECULA AND BLOCK 17 VACATED ALLEYWAY AND w / co PORTIONS OF FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES STREET VACATED I R/W Q / PER M.B. 15/726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA w w I DAM. O 1 /2O-22 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD / T � SEARCHED FOR, FOUND NOTHING "' PARCEL 2 ESTABLISHED PER CR 17 0040 FOUND 1" IP TAGGED "RCE21914" SECOND STREET DOWN 0.1' PER RS 71/1 p2 -pin �n SCALE 1"=30' N44'28'S5T 470.59'— 0 15' 30' 60' (BASIS OF BEARINGS) (470.59') I o o �CC� �N PROJECT GRAPHIC SCALE A EXISTING N44'28'35"E 440.60' R/W FIRST STREET LOCATION / 1 210.30' (210.31') 129,70' V230.30' N5442'4 „ VICINITY MAP 15 I TR/W=10'14'12," 41.04' p 35'36'S9" I I NOT TO SCALE R=100.00 =70.0 L=17.87' L-43,51' I 1 / B II 1 I PROPOSED i 1 1 1 / r�MECUTA PARKWAY / 1 1 1 30 MERCEDES 1 I I STREET VACATION I I RECORDED I 1 0 5 1 1 F 05/20/1980 AS I ZONING: OLD TOWN SPECIFIC P-1 AN (SP-5) / OWNER LEGAL DESCRIPTION LAND USE: SPECIFIC PLAN 1 I I o INST. 54902, O.R. I N STEVE Y. KIM LIVING TRUST LOTS 1 THRU 24 INCLUSIVE BLOCK 17 MAP OF 1 IMPLr l\Ar NA f147N (BPI) o j i 1 i / 3785 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD #2211 TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF CD o n 15'a 1 1 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, 1 w o N P/L I I ATTN: MR. STEVE KIM COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LU to CD 0 I o Ln 0 0 1 o INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND � I R.S.f 1 / 01 �, U N / CIVIL ENGINEER PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONT STREET AND MERCEDES CN '—' :� Ln a � � I I � � CALTRANS R/W R/W Z o N APN 922-072-022 Z < z I z / O "' R W— P/L VALUED ENGINEERING, INC LC In 600 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE, SUITE C102 PROJECT LOCATION 1 Z � a� -- J I I UPLAND CA 91786 N f APNS: 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, PARCEL MAP P NO, 37448 � I Q Ld� 35 2 I I PHONE: R909) 982-4601 \ it (' I I / ATTN: MR. JEFF MEITER ADDRESS:NECORONER OF -023 STREET AND FIRST P,M,B 246/50-53 0l / � o P L I STREET, TEMECULA, CA PARCEL ] � _ _ � t ZONING APN 922-073-026 1 z I N44'29'26"E 210.35' (210.34') SPECIFIC PLAN (SP5) DOWNTOWN CORE/HOTEL OVERLAY SITE SUMMARY / / GROSS ACREAGE: 2.136 ACRES 30' 1 30' o /// / GENERAL PLAN STREET DEDICATION: -0.013 ACRES SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STREET VACATION: +0.024 ACRES ZONING: OLD] TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-5) / LAND USE. SPECIFIC PLAN / NET ACREAGE: 2.146 ACRES 1 IMPLEMENATION (BPI) / SURVEYOR'S NOTES # OF PARCELS: 1 1 z PARCEL 1 / (XXX.XX') RECORD INFORMATION PER RS 7111 / [XXX.XX'] RECORD INFORMATION PER RS 112123 w 4 / o / SURVEYOR'S NOTES I � // �� CALTRANS R/W EXISTING EASEMENTS 1 rn oo / RECORDED 06/23/1948 <(/ AS INST. 3269 O.R. �C/ 0AN EASEMENT FOR POLE LINES, CONDUITS OR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN o 00 // �� RECORDED 12/04/1967 FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA, RECORDED 05/30/1990 AS INST NO. 90-195837, O.R. I ^ AS INST, 105961, O.R. LAND DEDICATED / RECORDED 07/12/1973 � 0 AN EASEMENT FOR SIGN, ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF ADAMS ADVERTISING, RECORDED BY FINAL ORDER AS INST. 73-90987, O.R. 08/14/1989 AS INST, NO. 89-274094, O.R. OF CONDEMNATION / PORTION OF PUBLIC REC. 3/4/1998 AS / ryh 03 AN EASEMENT FOR POLES AND ANCHORS IN FAVOR OF THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE VACATED I INST. 98-076563, O.R. RECORDED 09/21/1917 AS BOOK 470, PAGE 14, OF DEEDS **NOT PLOTTABLE** PER FINAL PARCEL MAP / ti3S, y 0 AN EASEMENT FOR POLES IN FAVOR OF THE SOUTHERN SIERRAS POWER COMPANY, RECORDED 06/29/1922 . � ,` AS BOOK 571, PAGE 157, OF DEEDS **NOT PLOTTABLL** 9 ' �6SjS] 69�5� R/W 5 1 ��// ACCESS RIGHTS Z RESTRICTED PER INST, 94502, O.R. RECORDED 17.83 317.63' / 05/20/1980 PROPOSED EASEMENTS N44'30'16"E 335.46' (335.46') L� FOUND 1" IP TAGGED DA AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PUBLIC STREET AND UTILITY PURPOSES t "RIV. CO. SURVEY R/W" © AN EASEMENT DEDICATED TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES o 7UP 0.2' PER IRS 71/1 _ _ FIRST STREET / SEARCHED FOR, FOUND NOTHING N44'— — — BASIS OF BEARINGS STABLISHED PER CR 17-0039 30'16"E 368.85' SEARCHED FOR / FOUND NOTHING THE CENTERLINE OF SECOND STREET, SHOWN AS NORTH 44'28'35" EAST ON R.S. 71/1, WAS USED AS THE o BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. ` UTILITY PURVEYORS / R/W WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER NATURAL GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SERVICE 42135 WINCHESTER ROAD SERVICE 962 N. MOUNTAIN AVENUE TEMECULA, CA APN 922-010-031 1 1 \ MAP P OF r r M r C U I 2 6-6900(800) 4/\ / (951) 2590 91762 � L BLOCK 1 � / (800) 27-2200 PORTION SEWER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT TELEPHONE FRONTIER SERVICE 2270 TRUMBLE ROAD SERVICE 280 S. LOCUST STREET PERRIS, CA 92570 POMONA, CA 91766 N \ (951) 928-3777 (909) 397-0042 APN 922-075-001 / 1 \ / ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORINA EDISON COMPANY CABLE TIME WARNER COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE 24487 PRELIPP ROAD TELEVISION 212 S. INDIAN HILL BOULEVARD WILDOMAR, CA 92595 SERVICE CLAREMONT, CA 91711 (800) 611-1911 (800) 892-4357 1 \ I \ I \ I CONSTRUCTION RECORD DATE BY REVISIONS ACC'D DATE BENCH MARK SEAL: Designed By Drawn By Checked By Drawing No. SCALE �EYs��, DH JH JDM C/TYO� TE/I�EC"UL.4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Contractor �� ,y�_ ,y RECOMMENDED BY- DATE.• Horizontal / Plons Prepared Under Supervision Of Inspector � ACCEPTED BY 1� • DATE• TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 38349 TPM-1 C * No 6469s D PATRICKTHOMAS, P.E. FINAL PARCEL CONDITION DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS / CITY ENGINEER VerticalGINKKRING, INC Date R.C.E. No. 44223 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA Date Completed CIV �L r CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING OF`� -� 6D0 N. MOUNTAIN AVE, STE C102, UPLAND, CA 91766 64696 PA22-0037 FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CArJ2 SUBMITTAL #6 Sheet Of PHONE: (909) 962-4601 R.C.E. No. G�y of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProces singgasrclkrec. com May 16, 2024 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application Nos. PA22-0035 and PA22-0037, a Development Plan for an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooperATemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Matt Peters Assistant Director of Community Development Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form, Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Temecula Resort & Spa (PA22-0035, PA22-0037) Description of Project: Development Plan for an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven (7) story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Project Location: APNs: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023 Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside The Planning Commission approved the above described project on May 15, 2024 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ® Categorical Exemption: (Section Number 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects) ❑ Other: Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner Phone Number: (951) 506-5137 Signature: Matt Peters Assistant Director of Community Development Date: Notice of Public Hearin THE CITY OF TEMECULA - 41000 Main Street- Temecula, CA 92590 — TemeculaCA.gov A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No.: PA22-0035, PA22-0037 Applicant: Steve Kim Project Location: East side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNs: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023) Proposal: Development Plan for an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilitiesiballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects). Case Planner: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: May 15, 2024 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM AffrlMk o� yw Project Site 0 0 400 800 Feet 1 I 1 The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center, 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — TemeculaCA.gov — and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. REQUESTS TO SPEAK AND PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD REQUEST TO SPEAK Ot r PLANNING COMMISSION 19H9 Date: I Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: ❑ Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Commission commencing the Public Comment period. For all Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: Ke CC`G(, ✓ 'mil �y ► Phone Number: / Address Email address: C4 925c7/ If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: le 11WKV Cz, I, - Please note that all information presented at a Commission meeting becomes public recor All information provided is optional. Public Comment Non -Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item: ❑ Date: 02- Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the Secretary rp for to the Commission commencing the Public Comment period. For all Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. Once the speaker is call ed tospea Lp_�o k, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: �_ U Phone Number: .- Address: Email ad If you are represe ting an organizatigqn or group, pLease give the name: Please note that all information presented at a Commission meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK PLANNING COMMISSION 1989 Date: Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: Agenda Item: F] Item Description or Item No. AW Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Commission commencing the Public Comment period. For all Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. 1? R `U04L 0 _L� t C U-1 Phone Number: 13 12166 address: Q_ you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a Commission meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Public Comment: REQUEST TO SPEAK OLD TOWN LOCAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE �� Z Date: r T Non -Agenda Item: El Item Description or Item No. Agenda Item: Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the Secretary prior to the Committee commencing the Public Comment period. For all Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the Secretary !ji to the Committee addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speaker please cpme forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Phone Number: Please note that all information presented at a Committee meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. P: (626) 314-3821 0 F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai E: info@mitchtsailaw.com Law Firm VIA E-MAIL May 15, 2024 Planning Commissioners, City of Temecula 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 Em: PlanningCommissiongtemeculaca.gov Supplemental Information (Correspondence) Received 05/15/2024 Public Hearing 139 South Hi Item #3 (PA22-003S/37) Pasadena, CIRCULATION COPIES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: City Staff: RE: Agenda Item No. 3: Temecula Resort & Spa Project (PA22-0035; PA22-0037) Dear Honorable Commissioners, On behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters (formally known as Southwest Mountain States Regional Council of Carpenters) ("Carpenters" or "WSRCC'�, this Office is submitting these comments to the City of Temecula ("City' regarding Agenda Item No. 3: the Temecula Resort & Spa Project ("Project'. The Project calls for the development of an approximately 288,269 square foot, 355 room, seven story, 91-foot, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The Project was previously presented before the Planning Commission in September 2023. At that hearing, the Planning Commission determined that the Project would need to be redesigned to conform with the standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. WSRCC is a labor union representing roughly 90,000 union carpenters in 12 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. No. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 2of14 Individual members of WSRCC live, work, and recreate in the City and in its surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's social and environmental impacts. WSRCC expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, § 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield Citi-ZensforLocal Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Dater Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121. Moreover, WSRCC requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Res. Code, § 21000 et seq.), and the California Planning and Zoning Law ("Planning and Zoning Law") (Gov. Code, §§ 65000-65010). Public Resources Code §§ 21092.2, and 21167(f) and Government Code § 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency's governing body. I. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT The City should require the Project to be built using local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state -approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state -approved apprenticeship training program. Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note: [A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 3 of 14 reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling. Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded: [L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost —and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well -trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.' Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u]se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program" can result in air pollutant reductions.Z Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008: People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would 1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wP-content /ul2loads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.12df. Z South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available athtW://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May?-027 12df?sfvrsn=10 City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 4 of 14 include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.' Moreover, local hire mandates and skill -training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.' Some municipalities have even tied local hire and other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that: In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits. Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 ("AB2011'�. AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by -right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements. The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts. 3 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available athtti2s•//cyroundtable org /static /media /pploads /publications /Cvrjobs- housing.12df a Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available atht_tR//reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825-12df. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 5 of 14 II. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High -risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID- 19.1 Western States Regional Council of Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project's construction activities. WSRCC requests that the Lead Agency require safe on -site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site. In particular, based upon Western States Regional Council of Carpenters' experience with safe construction site work practices, WSRCC recommends that the Lead Agency require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site: Construction Site Design: • The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points. • Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening. • A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening. • The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social 'Santa Clara County Public Health Qune 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, availableathtWs://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covidl 9 /Pages /12ress-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aslx. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 6 of 14 distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details. • There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening. • Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site. Testing Procedures: • The temperature screening being used are non -contact devices. • Temperature readings will not be recorded. percnnnPl ,v 11 be screened upon entering the testing renter �.,. -Personnel and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual. • Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before temperature screening. • Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be refused access to the Project Site. • Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate [ZONE 2] • After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors. • If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading. • If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 7of14 allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A. Planning • Require the development of an Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10 people including all -hands meetings and all -hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.' The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site. Western States Regional Council of Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment ("ICRA") training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.' e See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America's Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available athttps://www.cl2wr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU CPWR Standards COVID-19.12df; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at hops•//dpw lacouniy Wv/building-and-safety/docs/pw guidelines -construction -sites Pdf. ' For details concerning WSRCC's ICRA training program, see hips://icrahealthcare.com/. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 8of14 ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities. ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities. The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols. III. THE PROJECT DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CLASS 32 EXEMPTION. CEQA has two basic purposes. First, CEQA is designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CCR" or "CEQA Ouidelines'� § 15002(a)(1).8 "Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental conscqucnccs of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the CEQA analysis, often an Environmental Information Report ("EIR") `protects not only the environment but also informed self-government.' [Citation.]" Citizens of Goleta Malley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. The EIR has been described as "an environmental `alarm bell' whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return." Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay P. Bd. of Port Commis. (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354 ("Berkeley Jets'); County of Inyo P. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal. App. 3d 795, 810. Second, CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage when possible by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a) (2) and (3). See also, Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553; Laurel Heights ImprovementAss'n v. Re gents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal. 3d 376, 400. The EIR serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to "identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced." CEQA Guidelines The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Tide 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.) The CEQA Guidelines are given "great weight in interpreting CEQA except when ... clearly unauthorized or erroneous." Center for Biological Diversity P. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 9 of 14 15002(a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has "eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible" and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are "acceptable due to overriding concerns" specified in CEQA section 21081. CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A—B). Although CEQA creates strong presumption in favor of requiring the preparation an EIR, it enumerates certain limited categories of activities exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. Those "categorical exemptions" and the criteria a project must meet to fit within them are listed in section 15302 through 15333 of the CEQA Guidelines. Categorical exemptions are narrowly construed to afford the fullest possible environmental protection. See Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Wlater Management Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.AppAth 677, 697). Furthermore, even projects that technically fit the criteria of a categorical exemption might nevertheless by excepted from relying on them for a variety of reasons enumerated at CCR § 15300.2. If a project does not fit the criteria of a categorical exemption, or if it meets the criteria of a categorical exemption but is excepted from relying on the exemption pursuant to CCR § 15300.2, the City must evaluate the project through an EIR or other CEQA analysis. The Class 32 urban infill exemption applies only if "[a]pproval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." CEQA Guidelines § 15332. To rely on the exemption the City must make findings as to significant effects. Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park Wlest Community Preservation Group P. City of San Diego (2006) 139 Cal.AppAth 249, 268. The City has a burden to provide substantial evidence, which must be based upon facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts and expert opinion, rather than the City's mere speculation, to support its findings. CEQA Guidelines § 15384(a); Save Our Big Trees P. City of Santa Cru.Z (2015) 241 Cal. App. 4th 694, 711 (a lead agency "bears the burden to demonstrate with substantial evidence that the Project constitutes an action to assure the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of the environment.") (citing Mu�Z,y Ranch Co. v. Solano CountAirportLand Use Com. (2007) 41 Cal. 4th 372, 386). In summary, the City must demonstrate with substantial evidence that the Project would not result in significant environmental impacts pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15332. CEQA exemptions must be construed narrowly. See County ofAmador v. El Dorado County WlaterAgency (1999) 76 Ca1.App.4th 931, 966; Aptos ResidentsAss'n v. Co. of Santa City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 10of14 Cru,, (2018) 20 Cal. App. 5th 1039, 1046, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 605, 612. Public agencies utilizing CEQA exemptions must support their determination with substantial evidence. PRC § 21168.5; see Fairbank v. City of'Mill Valley (1999) 75 Ca1.App.4th 1243, 1251, as modified on denial of reh'g (Oct. 29, 1999) ("substantial evidence test governs our review of the city's factual determination that a project falls within a categorical exemption"); Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park W1. Cmty. Pres. Grp. v. City of San Diego (2006 )139 Cal.AppAth 249, 267; Davidon Homes v. City of San Jose (1997) 54 Cal.AppAth 106, 115, as modified on denial of reh'g (Apr. 29, 1997) ("On review, an agency's categorical exemption determination will be affirmed if supported by substantial evidence that the project fell within the exempt category of projects"); Ma an v. Cnty. of Kings (2002) 105 Cal.AppAth 468, 475, as modified Qan. 13, 2003) (an agency "only has the burden to demonstrate substantial evidence that the ordinance fell within the exempt category of projects"); San Lorenzo Valley Cmty. Advocs. for Res ionsible Educ. V. San Lorenzo Vally UTn�ieaSch. Dis. (2006)139 Cal.App.4th 1356, 1386; Union ol?Aled. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171, 1186; MuZ.0 Rancb Co. v. Solano Cnty. Airport Land Use Com. (2007) 41 CalAth 372, 380, 386-387, as modified (Sept. 12, 2007). In order for the Project to qualify for a Class 32 exemption to CEQA environmental review, the Project: (i) cannot be subject to the six exceptions to CEQA exemptions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15300.2, and (ii) must also meet all of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines section 15332, as follows: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; CJ (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 11 of 14 Here, the Project fails to provide the substantial evidence necessary to support the required findings. Therefore, the Project does not qualify for the Class 32 CEQA exemption. A. The City Lacks Substantial Evidence to Determine Whether the Project Would Have a Significant Impact on Noise or Air Quality, To support the findings required under part (d) of the Class 32 exemption, the City gave the following reasoning: The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (Notice of Exemption, p. 2.) Importantly, the City has failed to provide any findings relating to the Project's noise or air quality impacts. Rather, these impacts are simply lumped in without any supportive findings. The City has a burden to provide substantial evidence, which must be based upon facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts and expert opinion, rather than the City's mere speculation, to support its findings. (CEQA Guidelines 15384(a); Save Our Big Trees P. City of Santa Crud (2015) 241 Cal. App. 4th 694, 711.) Without substantial evidence, the City cannot approve of the Class 32 exemption. B. The City Lacks Substantial Evidence to Determine Whether the Project will be Adequately Served by Public Utilities and Service. To support it's finding of under part (e), the City provides a single sentence stating that "[t]he project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services." (Notice of Exemption, p. 2.) This statement, however, is unsupported by the necessary substantial evidence. Indeed, the Conditions of Approval include obtaining clearances from Caltrans, Rancho California Water District, and Easter Municipal Water District. (Conditions of Approval, p. 16.) These conditions indicate that the Project has not yet received these clearances and, thus, are not currently adequately served. The Draft Conditions include City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 12of14 a letter from the Eastern Municipal Water District which notes that "[t]he subject project will require sewer service from EMWD, with the potential requirement for on - site and offsite facilities and associated easements to adequately serve the project demands from existing EMWD facilities." (Conditions of Approval, p. 27.) As stated, EMWD cannot yet adequately serve the Project. Further, discussion on the Project's impacts on firefighter or police resources has been provided. As the City has failed to provide the necessary substantial evidence, the Class 32 exemption cannot be approved. IV. THE CITY MUST PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROJECT CEQA is a California statute designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines' y 15002(a)(1).' At its core, "[i]ts purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made." Citi.Zens of Goleta Malley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. To achieve this purpose, CEQA mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR' for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Communities for a Better Environment v. Ricbmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80. The EIR requirement "is the heart of CEQA." CEQA Guidelines, § 15003(a). A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA. This presumption is reflected in what is known as the "fair argument" standard, under which an agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal. App. 4th 1597, 1602; Friends of "B" St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal. 3d 988, 1002. The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seg, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.) The CEQA Guidelines are given "great weight in interpreting CEQA except when ... clearly unauthorized or erroneous." Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fisb dam' Wlildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217. City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 13 of 14 The fair argument test stems from the statutory mandate that an EIR be prepared for any project that "may have a significant effect on the environment." Public Resources Code ("PRC") § 21151; No Oil, Inc. P. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal. App. 3d 68, 75; Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal. App. 5th 877, 884. Under this test, if a proposed project is not exempt and may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR. PRC §§ 21100(a), 21151; CEQA Guidelines § 15064(a) (1), (0(1). An EIR may be dispensed with only if the lead agency finds no substantial evidence in the initial study or elsewhere in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Parker Shattuck Neigbbors V. Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal. App. 4th 768, 785. In such a situation, the agency must adopt a negative declaration. PRC § 21080(c)(1); CEQA Guidelines 15063(b)(2), 15064(�(3). "Significant effect upon the environment" is defined as "a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment." PRC § 21068; CEQA Guidelines 15382. A project "may" have a significant effect on the environment if there is a "reasonable probability" that it will result in a significant impact. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 13 Cal. 3d at 83 fn. 16; Sundstrom P. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal. App. 3d 296, 309. If any aspect of the project may result in a significant impact on the environment, an EIR must be prepared even if the overall effect of the project is beneficial. CEQA Guidelines § 15063(b)(1). See County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal. App. 4th 1544, 1580. This standard sets a "low threshold" for preparation of an EIR. Consolidated Irrig. Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal. App. 4th 187, 207; Nelson P. County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal. App. 4th 252; Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 903, 928; Bowman a City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal. App. 4th 572, 580; Citi.Zen Action to Serve All Students v. Tbornley (1990) 222 Cal. App. 3d 748, 754; Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal. App. 3d 296, 310. If substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may have a significant environmental effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR even if other substantial evidence before it indicates the project will have no significant effect. See Jensen v. City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal. App. 5th 877, 886; Clews Land & Livestock V. City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal. App. 5th 161, 183; Stanislaus Audubon Socy, Inc. v. County ofStanislaus (1995) 33 Cal. App. 4th 144, 150; Brentwood Assn for No Drilling, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1982) 134 City of Temecula — Temecula Resort & Spa Project May 15, 2024 Page 14 of 14 Cal. App. 3d 491; Friends of "B" St. v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal. App. 3d 988; CEQA Guidelines § 15064(�(1). As there is a fair argument that the Project may cause significant environmental impacts stemming from the sheer size of the Project, resulting in significant consumption of energy, greenhouse gas emissions, and construction related noise and air quality impacts, to name a few, the low threshold is met and the City should prepare an EIR for the Project. V. CONCLUSION In sum, WSRCC requests that the City require a local workforce, that the City impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the City reject the Project's Class 32 exemption and require an EIR for the Project. If the City has any questions, feel free to contact my Office. Sinccrely, .4,L�44� race H brook Attorneys for Western States Regional Council of Carpenters Attached: March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).