Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout071090 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD JULY 10, 1990 An Executive Session of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:38 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. City Attorney Scott Field announced that the purpose of this closed session was to discuss purchase of real property located at 43172 Business Park Drive and pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) to discuss pending litigation in the matter of Jones Intercable vs. the City of Temecula. The executive session was adjourned at 7:04 PM. The regular meeting was called to order at 7:10 PM with all members present. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor T. J. Mercer, Rancho Community Church. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Birdsall. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Parks presented Doug Davies, Chairman of the Seventh Annual Balloon and Wine Festival, with a certificate of appreciation and expressed his thanks for an outstanding job. Minutes 7/10/90 1 Councilmember Mufioz introduced the newly appointed traffic controllers and thanked them for their efforts in relieving traffic congestion at the freeway overpasses. He also introduced Ron Farwell of All City Management. Mr. Farwell thanked the community for their support of this program, and pledged continued effort in controlling the City's traffic problems. Judy Rosen, President of C.A.R.E. (Coalition For A Reasonable Environment), presented the City with a check for $4,500 to aid in the funding of the overpass traffic directing program. PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Murphy, 30326 Calle Hallcon, requested that the invocations be no longer than the flag salute, 31 words. Bill Harker, 21130 General Keamy Road, member of the Old Town Committee, reported the first meeting of this committee was held July 9, 1990. He explained the minute Item No. 4, Construction of Curbs, Gutters and Sidewalks on Main Street and he asked Council to keep the Old Town District consistent by requiring black asphalt curbs, gutters and sidewalks. Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos, stated he read a newspaper article reporting that 120 acres of park land had been identified, but most of this park area would be private. He asked whether this satisfied Quimby Act. He said as a father of two, he is concerned there are no parks available for his children's use. Bob Newsom, 29760 Rancho California Road, stressed the problem with parking in the Moraga Center and asked Council to issue a moratorium on further building in this center until parking requirements are met. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-9. Councilmember Lindemans requested the minutes reflect his no vote on Item No. 8. The motion carried as follows: 1. Minntes 1.1 1.2 Approved the minutes of June 26, 1990 as corrected. Approved the minutes of June 30, 1990 as mailed. Minute,~ 7/10/90 2 - 2. Resolution Authorizim, Examination of Sales and Use Tax Records o 2.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-70 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING EXAMINATION OF SALES AND USE TAX RECORDS Resolution Appointin_~ The City Mana_oer 3.1 Adopted a resolution enfified: RESOLUTION NO. 90-71 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TElVIE APPOINTING THE CITY MANAGER Resolution Appoint the City Treasnrer 4.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMEC~A APPOINTING THE CITY TREASURER Resolution Appointin~ the City Clerk 5.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPOINTING THE CITY CLERK Minutes 7/10/90 3 Second Reading of Ordinance Fstablishing a Personnel system 6.1 Adopted and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 2.60 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A PERSONNEL SYSTEM ENTITLED "PERSONNEl. SYSTEM" o Street Name Change - Kathleen Way to Ridge Park Drive 7.1 Continue to the meeting of July 24, 1990. Appropriate Fund~ for P~,rchase of City Manager's Vehicle 8.1 Authorize budget appropriation of $20,500 for the purpose of purchasing a vehicle for the use of the City Manager from account no. 001-160-42-5608, said funds to be transferred from reserve for Contingency (account no. 001-905) The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 NOES: 1 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mufioz Parks Lindemans None Resob,tion Approving Payment of Demands 9.1 Adopted a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-?4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A. Minutes 7/10/90 4 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Weed Abatement Proplmm City Manager Dixon reported this staff report will bc handled by the County Fire Department and introduced Paul Smith to answer any questions from the Council. Mayor Parks opened the public hearing at 7:40 PM. Mayor Parks asked if it is a procedural matter that a public hearing be held on this issue. Mr. Smith stated this is the case and property owners involved have been notified of the public hearing. Having no requests to speak, Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 7:41 PM. Councilmember Birdsall moved, Councilmember Moore seconded a motion to direct staff to proceed with abatement procedures pursuant to the provisions adopted in Resolution 90- 55. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None Minutes 7/10/90 5 COUNCIL BUSINFSS 11. Second Extenqion of Time - Tentative Parcel Map 21383 Gary Thornhill, Principal Planner, stated this is a request for a second extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383. He said this item came before the Council on June 26, 1990, and discussions were held regarding the amount of proposed grading for this site. The intention of staff was to resolve these concerns and come back to the Council with a receive and file recommendation, however the problems have not been resolved and the recommendation of staff is to set this item for public hearing on July 24, 1990. Mayor Parks stated the applicant has requested that the Council approve this issue tonight and submitted a letter to the Council offering to enter into a development agreement with the City addressing the concerns of the Planning Department. Mr. Thomhill said he felt this is not the best method to handle this situation, stating staff may be able to simply condition the map. Mayor Parks said the map was approved by the County on March 24, 1987, and he understands the developer is experiencing a hardship due to the length of time it has taken to process this project. City Attorney Fields recommended the best way to handle this issue is to set for public hearing so all the issues can be addressed and at that time, if the Council feels it is appropriate, the extension of time could be conditioned. He said his concern with approving the extension tonight would be the exclusion of other interested third parties. Councilmember Moore said it is her understanding that public hearings have been held on this issue by the County. City Attorney Fields stated hearings have been held, but only on the original map. Councilmember Birdsall said the developer is agreeing to the conditions the Council has asked for, and she does not feel there is a need for another pubic hearing. Councilmember Lindemans objected to the grading planned for this project, requesting that the City take a stand on the amount of excavation, permitted on the hillsides. He asked about phasing maps and who would be responsible for landscaping. Councilmember Moore moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to approve a second extension of time and require the owner to enter into a development agreement as set forth in a letter dated July 5, 1990. Minutes 7/10/90 6 Councilmember Mufioz asked that the matter be set for public heating as recommended by staff. Councilmember Lindemans requested referring this to the Planning Commission for public heating. He said the City needs a master plan before damage done by projects such as this is irreversible. Gary Thornhill reported that in the event the Council wishes to approve this second extension of time, further conditions have been suggested by staff. He said the conditions outlined in the letter from the developer were tightened, and the developer is in agreement with the modifications. He provided the Council with an additional staff report outlining the suggested changes. Mayor Parks stated that the developer has agreed to be responsive to the City's conditions and stated that further delay of this project, causes a great hardship on the developer. He stressed this project, with the agreed conditions, is in the best interest of the citizens of Temecula. Councilmember Lindemans questioned who would be responsible for landscaping of this project. Mayor Parks answered that before a grading permit is granted, bonding must be done for landscaping. City Manager Dixon stated the issue tonight is a second extension of time, not a final approval. He said the Planning Department would have time to review the conditions proposed and make changes if necessary. The final approval will still come before the Council. Councilmember Mufioz stated if staff recommends a public hearing, he believes this is the best course of action. The motion was amended by Councilmember Moore, and the second by Councilmember Birdsall as follows: Approve second extension of time on Tentative Parcel Map 21383, require the developer to enter into an agreement incorporating the standards and conditions set forth in the supplemental staff report, and direct staff to submit this developers agreement to the City Council concurrent with the final map. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Parks NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Mufioz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes 7/10/90 7 RECESS Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:20 PM. The meeting was reconvened, following the CSD meeting at 9:00 PM. 12. Tract ~3304 (Club Valencia) - Final Map Traffic Study Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, reported this subdivision was originally approved by the County of Riverside Board of Directors on May 10, 1988. The project has recently been extended 60 days, awaiting City approval. The 60 days runs out tonight. He explained this tract was originally approved as a condominium project, and has been changed to an apartment complex. Tom Sorrentino, representing Willdan presented the Traffic Report. He stated the purpose of this study was to review and document traffic conditions and recommend improvements. The categories addressed are as follows: Left turn movements into the project, left turn movements out of the project, driveway access points on Rancho California Road and Deposit of funds in a Road Benefit Fund. Mr. Sorrentino reported the proposed traffic volumes generated by the proposed development amount to approximately 7 % of the total traffic volume at the intersection of Moraga Road and Rancho California Road during the PM peak period. He recommended the following mitigation procedures: 1. The applicant pay $4,500 toward the cost of striping and signing Rancho California Road between Moraga Road and Cosmic Drive. 2. No building permits shall be issued to the applicant prior to the construction of Rancho California Road to its standard half width from Moraga Road to Cosmic Drive. 3. At the time that a Certificate of Occupancy is issued, the applicant is required to deposit an amount of $10,000.00 to a newly approved City "Road Benefit Fund". 4. Road Department Condition No. 5 shall be modified to read: "Prior to issuance of Building Permits, Rancho California Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 545 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100." 5. Prior to issuance of building permits, a raised median island with left turn pockets will be constructed on Rancho California Road in accordance with County Standard 100 and Additional Condition No. 1. Minutes 7/10/90 8 Mr. Sorrentino further listed on-site improvements and conditions as reported in the staff report. Doug Steward, recommended the following course of action: 1. Consider the results of the Traffic and Drainage Study authorized on June 15, 1990. 2. Approve the findings contained in the staff report and set additional Conditions of Approval for Tract 23304. 3. Approve an agreement between IDM Corporation and the City of Temecula for storm drain easements across the tract. 4. Approve Tract 23304 subject to the attached revised conditions of approval. Councilmember Lindemans presented Council with a letter from Temecula Valley Unified School listing area development schedules. He stated this project will put a great strain on the adjacent school, stating it is close to capacity now and suggested putting these projects on hold until such time as these issues could be worked out. He distributed a letter from Dr. Patricia B. Novotney, Superintendent of Temecula Valley Unified School District stating the School District does not support the approval of additional high density housing in the absence of the ability to make an overall analysis, based on a master plan for the City. Mayor Parks asked staff what the status on the approved agreement with Bedford Properties to widen Rancho California Road. Doug Stewart reported that the plans are 95 % complete, and construction should begin within the next few months. Mayor Parks asked if it is the recommendation of the traffic study to have raised medians and if the development can be conditioned to install the median on adjacent property. Doug Stewart stated it is up to the City to set standards. City Manager Dixon reported the purpose of the raised median is to prohibit cross traffic. Mayor Parks asked if the drainage issue has been resolved. Doug Stewart answered it has. Mr. Stewart introduced Steve Nicholson, IDM Corp. representing the developer. Mr. Nicholson stated the traffic report does not call for a raised median. He said he met with the traffic engineer and discussed alternate solutions. He said with proper stacking (120 feet), the requirement for a controlled entry was deemed unnecessary. Minutes 7/10/90 9 Councilmember Mufioz asked if IDM is willing to install the raised median. Mr. Nicholson stated IDM is willing to install its half of the median. Mr. Nicholson requested conditions be changed to require improvements be done before occupancy, rather than prior to obtaining building permits. He stated road work would begin immediately, but this would allow road work to be concurrent with project construction. He also stated school mitigation fees are estimated at % million dollars. James Marple, 28541 Via Princesa, expressed his concern regarding urban run-off. He stated Murrietta High is installing equipment to recharge water. This will represent a savings of the yearly water usage of approximately 350 families. He stated in the future the EPA may mandate this equipment be installed, and asked Council to condition large projects to utilize and recharge water. Mayor Parks called a one minute break at 9:35 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:36 PM. Jim Allman, 43954 Gatewood Way, asked Council to examine their focus on Items 11 and 12. He said he disapproved of the power struggle within the Council and asked them to make decisions based on logic and a general plan. Doug Stewart reported to the Council the rules for newly incorporated cities in the approval of new and tentative maps. When any tentative map has been approved by the Board of Supervisors, the newly incorporated City shall approve the final map if it meets all conditions. When a vesting tentative map has been approved by the County Board of Supervisors, the City shall approve the final map. He reported there are only two exceptions: 1. Health or safety risks. 2. Conflict with State or Federal Law. Councilmember Mufioz brought up two concerns. First, he stated the map was approved as a condominium, and the changing to an apartment complex greatly changes the impact on the community. He stated his opposition to these kinds of changes. Second, he expressed the community has asked that no additional apartments in this area be permitted. He also questioned changing the conditions on this project, i.e. (putting in improvements prior to issuance of a building permit). For these reasons, he stated his opposition to approval of this project. Councilmember Lindemans requested that the Council address the school issue, by not allowing this project to be changed from condominiums. He stated a delay would at least buy time for the school district to plan for extra students. Councilmember Lindemans moved to put a moratorium on apartments for six months. Minutes 7/10/90 10 City Attorney Fields stated this is not on the agenda and cannot be heard. Councilmember Lindemans withdrew his motion. Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Mufioz seconded a motion to direct staff to prepare a report on a six month apartment moratorium for the City of Temecula. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Birdsall stated this does not have any beating on the current project before Council. City Attomey Fields stressed to the Council that there is a significant problem with adding conditions to a project on the basis of schools. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve the final tract map subject to the conditions contained in the staff report with the following amendments: 1. Condition A-4 to read "Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy", 2. Condition A-5 to read "Prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy", Condition A-3 to be modified to contain the same language used in Condition A-4 of the traffic engineers report. The motion was carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Moore, Parks NOES: 1 C OUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 13. Minutes 7/10/90 Proposed Relocation of the Space ~ystem~ Divi.~ion City Manager Dixon introduced retired General Dick Burpee to give a presentation. General Burpee stated the Space Systems Division is presently located in E1 Segundo which is a very high cost area. He said the quality of life for personnel is not as high as in other parts of the country and it is difficult to attract high quality people to the LA area. 11 The current facility has no expansion capabilities, which are expected to be necessary. There are four alternative locations to be analyzed for this project: March AFB, Riverside, CA, Vandenberg AFB, Lompoc, CA, Kirkland AFB, Albuquerque, NM, and Peterson AFB/Falcon Air Base, Colorado Springs, CO. General Burpee stated it would be very advantageous to the residents of Temecula to have this clean industry in Riverside County, providing many jobs. General Burpee explained that if it is the desire of the City to have this facility located at March AFB, a strong community and Council support at the Federal and State level should be shown by adopting a Resolution in support of the relocation of the Space Systems Division to March AFB, and appropriation of $5,000 to Inland Empire Space Systems Division Relocation Group in support of this effort. City Manager Dixon recommended adoption of a resolution which will be brought back before the Council and appropriation of $5,000 in support of this effort. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to direct staff to prepare a resolution of support and appropriate $5,000 to be contributed to Inland Empire Space Systems Division Relocation Group in support of this effort. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None 14. Curfew for Minors Ordinance City Manager Dixon introduced Captain Rick Sayre, Chief of Police to give the presentation. Captain Sayre stated this ordinance was prepared to assist in law enforcement. The curfew would set restrictions for minors between the hours of 11:00 PM and 5:00 AM but stated there are exceptions to these restrictions. He stated minors may not be incarcerated and the first offense would result in a $50 fine. Sidney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, spoke in opposition to the ordinance. He questioned the wisdom of a curfew ordinance when there are no recreational programs available to the youth in the community. Minutes 7/10/90 12 Mayor Parks asked if this ordinance is necessary to properly enforce problems the City now faces. Captain Sayre stated there must be a reason for contact. This ordinance, along with the existing trespassing and alcohol possession laws should be sufficient to resolve property owners' concerns. Councilmember Lindemans expressed support of this ordinance, stating it would take care of the loitering problem, and also suggested working to have programs available to the youth. Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to waive further reading, read by title only and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 11.10 TO THE TIhMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CURFEW FOR MINORS. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None 15. Cable Television Franchise Ordinance City Manager Dixon introduced Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Systems to give a presentation. Mr. Hreha reported that on May 15, 1990, the City Council received and filed the Cable TV report and directed the City Manager to hire a Cable Television consultant to draft a new City Cable Television Ordinance. Mr. Hreha introduced Carl Pilnick to give a presentation. Mr. Pilnick of Telecommunications Management Corporation, stated the original County Franchise had few requirements of cable companies and many changes have occurred since Minutes 7/10/90 13 the adoption of the County franchise procedures. He said the objective of the proposed ordinance is to allow the City to regulate to the extent the State and Federal law allows. The proposed ordinance is a 70 page document and reflects the newest information available. Mr. Pilnick said this ordinance would be applicable to any new franchise. He suggested negotiating the existing franchise to make it more comparable to the new ordinance. Councilmember Lindemans asked if an applicant can be screened before the issuance of a license. Mr. Pilnick said they may be screened up to a certain point, however, a number of cases are going through the courts now, in an effort to reduce the amount of regulatory control. Mayor Parks called a one minute break at 10:50 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:51 PM. Mayor Parks asked City Attorney Fields if he had the opportunity to review this ordinance. Mr. Fields said he has no problem with this ordinance. He stated a Chapter Number needs to be inserted in Page 1 of the Ordinance. (Chapter 9.10) It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to waive further reading, read by title only and introduce an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-12 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GOVERNING CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISES HEREINAFTER GRANTED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Minutes 7/10/90 14 16. Divi.~ion of Decision-making Authority for rand Use Application~ City Attorney Fields reported a letter was included in the packet outlining the different types of planning permits. He discussed several options open to the City Council regarding who would approve these permits. These options are as follows: That the Planning Commission be authorized to hear and approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove all subdivision and development applications, with right of appeal to the City Council; That the Planning Commission act as an advisory agency only and be authorized to make recommendations to the City Council for approval, conditional approval, or disapproval; That there be a mix whereby the Planning Commission is authorized to hear and approve subdivision and development projects which are limited in scope or size. That the Planning Commission have the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or disapprove maps with an appeal process to the City Council set forth in option number 1, but with the addition that any Councilmember may appeal the decision by the Planning Commission without payment of any fee for the appeal. City Attorney Fields stated these are the four basic options open to the Council. Councilmember Lindemans stated he would like to refer this matter to City Manager Dixon to see how other cities handle permits. He said at the present he liked the receive and file method, enabling Council to see projects before they are approved. City Attorney Fields stated there are problems with the receive and file option. He said this creates lag time, which is some cases is not consistent with State law requirements. He encouraged the Council to choose another system. Councilmember Mufioz said the Council has expressed an interest in applying option number two for a period of six to nine months. Mayor Parks suggested trying option number four in which any Councilmember could appeal the decision of the Planning Commission for a six month period. City Manager Dixon suggested continuing this item off calendar to allow the City Manager to review and make recommendations to the Council. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue off-calendar to allow City Manager's review and recommendations. Minutes 7/10/90 15 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. CITY COUNCIl, REPORTS Councilmember Moore congratulated the Town Association on the 4th of July Celebrations. Councilmember Lindemans requested the following: 1. Staff address the matter of standards for curbs and gutters for the Old Town Historic District immediately. 2. Staff look at the parking ratios at the Moraga Center to assure they are adequate for planned uses. 3. Staff devise a policy dealing with street naming. 4. Staff look into the possibility of creating a "Blue Line" procedure for development on the hillsides. Councilmember Mufioz requested that staff instruct the Planning Commission to meet more frequently to specifically address the City's General Plan. Mayor Parks instructed staff that requests from a single Councilmember did not represent the entire Council and therefore should not be treated as such. He suggested placing these requests on the agenda for discussion by the entire Council Minute8 7/10/90 16 AD.IOURNMENT Councilmember Lindemans moved, Councilmember Birdsall seconded a motion to adjourn at 11:15 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: Jun S~~k, Deputy City Cler~~~ Minutes 7/10/90 17