Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05232024 TSC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 23, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chair David Matics FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner James "J.R." Richardson ROLL CALL: Ackerman, Carter, Matics, Richardson, Sullivan PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Approve Action Minutes of April 25, 2024 Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of April 25, 2024. Page 1 Traffic Safety Commission Agenda May 23, 2024 Attachments: Action Minutes BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images maybe displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to TrafficSafetyCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 2. Walcott Lane at Seville Street Traffic Calming Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission direct Staff to implement red curb and advanced warning signs to improve visibility at the intersection of Walcott Lane and Seville Street. Attachments: Agenda Report Exhibit A - Proposed Red Curb Location 3. Citywide Communications System Master Plan Recommendation Attachments: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the Citywide Communications System Master Plan report. Agenda Report Citywide Communications System Master Plan DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and file) 4. Fire Chief s Report Attachments: Fire Chief s Report - April 2024 5. California Highway Patrol Report Attachments: California Highway Patrol Report - April 2024 6. Police Chiefs Report Attachments: Police Chief s Report - April 2024 7. TRIP Report (Traffic Restrictions in Progress) Attachments: TRIP Report Page 2 Traffic Safety Commission Agenda May 23, 2024 DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Traffic Safety Commission will be held on Thursday, June 27, 2024, at 6:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Traffic Safety Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCA.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Public Works Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 Item No. 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 25, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chair David Matics FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Robert Carter ROLL CALL: Ackerman (absent), Carter, Matics, Richardson (absent), Sullivan PUBLIC COMMENTS — NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the Commission: • Mark Swearngin CONSENT CALENDAR Approve Action Minutes of March 28, 2024 Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission approve the Action Minutes of March 28, 2024. Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0, Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Sullivan, Second by Carter. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson absent. BUSINESS 2. Proposed Capital Improvement Program - Fiscal Years 2025-2029 Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission review and discuss the proposed Capital hmprovement Program (CIP) Circulation and infrastructure Projects for Fiscal Years 2024-2028 Receive and file only, no action. 3. Bristol Road at Worthington Place - Multi -way Stop Controls Anal Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission maintain the existing side street stop control at the intersection of Bristol Road at Worthington Place. Approved Staff Recommendation (3-0, Ackerman and Richardson absent): Motion by Matics, Second by Sulivan. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Ackerman and Richardson absent. 4. Pechanga Parkway Signal Coordination Project Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the Pechanga Parkway Signal Coordination Project. Receive and file only, no action. 5. Traffic Signal Priority Recommendation: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file a report on the City's Traffic Signal Priority List. Receive and file only, no action. DIVISION REPORTS (Receive and File) 6. California Highway Patrol Report 7. Police Chief s Report 8. TRIP Report (Traffic Restrictions in Progress) DIRECTOR REPORT COMMISSIONER REPORTS ADJOURNMENT At 6:51 PM, the Traffic Safety Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Thursday, May 23, 2024, at 6:00 PM, in the Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. David Matics, Chair Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Item No. 2 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 23, 2024 SUBJECT: Walcott Lane at Seville Street Traffic Calming PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission direct Staff to implement red curb and advanced warning signs to improve visibility at the intersection of Walcott Lane and Seville Street. BACKGROUND: In February of 2024, City staff received a complaint from the Vineyard Community HOA board regarding excessive speeds on Walcott Lane and difficulty in exiting the Vineyard residential development. The Vineyard development is comprised of 45 homes and is located on Seville Street at Walcott Lane. The HOA requested implementation of an all -way stop or other traffic calming measures to reduce excessive vehicular speeds on the roadway. Walcott Lane is a rural residential collector road from Calle Chapos to La Serena Way. Walcott Lane near the Vineyard development is a two-lane roadway and measures approximately 40' wide. Walcott Lane feeds several small residential developments and one-off single-family homes with direct driveway access. The 2023 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Walcott Lane is approximately 1,600 vehicles and the posted speed limit is 45 mph. Seville Street is a private residential road that provides gated access for the Vineyard development to Walcott Lane. The 2023 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Walcott Lane is approximately 150 vehicles and there is no posted speed limit. Staff performed a corridor review of Walcott Lane based on the concern of excessive speeds. Staff reviewed speed data and volume surveys using the City's Streetlight Data program for the corridor. Staff surveyed multiple locations on Walcott Lane between Calle Chapos and Klarer Lane and discovered that the 85th percentile speed for northbound and southbound traffic varied between 43 mph and 47 mph. The 85th percentile speeds are within acceptable limits of the posted speed limit. However, since there are times where motorists do travel over the 45 mph speed limit, staff determined that a traffic calming review was also warranted. The City of Temecula does not consider speedbumps, dips, or barriers as an effective method of traffic calming to reduce speeding and they are not supported by our first responders as it negatively affects emergency response times. Based on data collected, Staff does not feel the need to consider all -way stops or a traffic signal at the intersection of Walcott Lane and Seville Street at this time. All -way stops or a traffic signal would not be justified based on the limited side street traffic volumes, roadway characteristics or collision history. Also, since the speed data collected did not show an excessive speeding issue on Walcott Lane, Staff does not believe that the installation of Radar Speed Display Signs are warranted at this time. However, at the intersection of Walcott Lane and Seville Street, staff noticed that the line of sight could be improved for residents exiting the Vineyard development by restricting on -street parking adjacent to the intersection. Walcott Lane has a cresting vertical curve north of Seville Street which can make it more difficult to judge a vehicle exceeding the speed limit when vehicles are parked near the intersection. Parked vehicles limit the line of sight in the north and south direction as Vineyard residents are exiting the community and limit the visibility of exiting traffic from Seville Street for approaching vehicles on Walcott Lane. Due to the occasional higher speeds on Walcott Lane, and the limited sight visibility due to parked cars at the intersection with Seville Street, Staff has determined that restricting on -street parking would improve conditions for the Vineyard Community residents to exit safely. Staff recommend the installation of approximately 175' of red curb on Walcott Lane at the intersection of Seville Street (Exhibit A) and install advanced intersection warning signs to improve visibility for the intersection. FISCAL IMPACT: Minor cost associated with red paint and warning signs. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Proposed Red Curb Location �f ti5 .f IL lb R� Item No. 3 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: Traffic Safety Commission FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: May 23, 2024 SUBJECT: Citywide Communications System Master Plan PREPARED BY: Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the Traffic Safety Commission receive and file the Citywide Communications System Master Plan report. BACKGROUND: The Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP) provides a comprehensive plan to deploy modern fiber optic communication infrastructure which lays the foundation for secure, high-speed, reliable, future -proof communication networks for Temecula. This plan aims to transform connectivity, support economic growth, enhance public services, and improve the quality of life for Temecula residents. The CCSMP purpose is to guide the City's existing and future investment in fiber optic communications and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technology. The CCSMP is critical in ensuring the City's current and future communication system needs and objectives are realized in a systematic and sustainable way. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Citywide Communications System Master Plan ID CITYWIDE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM MASTER PLAN APRIL 2024 DRAFT FINAL I., CX( A A Acknowledgements City of Temecula Publir \A/nrkc Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works Nick Minicilli, Senior Civil Engineer Erick Escobedo, Associate Engineer II Information Technology & Support Services Michael Heslin, Director of IT & Support Services Damion Patrick, Assistant Director of IT & Support Services Consultant Team CT(' TrnffiC Jason Stack, Principal Manager Brett Hansen, Senior Project Engineer Ashley Adamos, Project Engineer III Ivan Gonzalez, Project Engineer II The Heart of Sou�amia w eco a� REVISION DATE STATUS / DESCRIPTION Citywide Communications System Master Plan Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................1 Need.......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose, Goals and Objectives................................................................................................................. 2 KeyRecommendations............................................................................................................................. 3 Implementation Phasing and Prioritization..............................................................................................4 Phase 1: Immediate Upgrades (Years 1-3)............................................................................................4 Phase 2: Near -Term Upgrades (Years 4-6)............................................................................................5 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Years 7-10)............................................................................................... 5 Orderof Magnitude Costs..................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 6 1.1 City Setting................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Regional, State, and National Plans and Architectures...............................................................7 1.2.1 California Broadband for All Action Plan................................................................................. 7 1.2.2 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Systems Engineering for ITS Handbook................8 1.2.3 Southern California Regional ITS Architecture........................................................................ 9 1.2.4 National ITS Architecture...................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Master Plan Mission and Goals................................................................................................. 10 1.4 Report Organization.................................................................................................................. 10 2 Existing Conditions Assessment.......................................................................12 2.1 Partnership................................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.1 Public Works Traffic Engineering.......................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS)...........................................................13 2.1.3 Roles and Activities...............................................................................................................14 2.2 Legacy Communication Systems...............................................................................................15 2.2.1 Copper Wire Analog Network............................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Serial Wireless Radios........................................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Analog Fiber Optic Network.................................................................................................. 17 2.3 Current Fiber Optic System.......................................................................................................18 2.3.1 Recent System Upgrade........................................................................................................18 2.3.2 Underground Infrastructure..................................................................................................18 2.3.3 Cable and Above Ground Infrastructure............................................................................... 20 2.4 Network Devices........................................................................................................................ 22 2.4.1 ITS Elements.......................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.2 IT Facilities............................................................................................................................. 22 2.5 Central Systems......................................................................................................................... 23 2.5.1 IT Data Center....................................................................................................................... 23 2.5.2 Traffic Operations Center/ Data Room................................................................................. 24 2.6 Communication System Topology Map..................................................................................... 24 2.7 System Architecture Schematic................................................................................................. 27 3 Needs Assessment........................................................................................... 28 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach................................................................................................................ 28 3.1.1 Information Technology and Support Services Department ................................................ 28 3.1.2 Public Works Department.....................................................................................................29 3.1.3 ITSS and Public Works Communication System Needs.........................................................30 3.2 Communication System Deficiency Identification.....................................................................32 3.2.1 Gaps.......................................................................................................................................32 3.2.2 Obsolete Equipment............................................................................................................. 34 3.2.3 Dated Standards....................................................................................................................36 3.2.4 Central Systems.....................................................................................................................38 3.2.5 Field Elements.......................................................................................................................38 3.2.6 Leased Facilities.....................................................................................................................39 3.3 City Initiatives............................................................................................................................41 3.3.1 Quality of Life Master Plan....................................................................................................41 3.3.2 Local Roadway Safety Plan....................................................................................................42 3.3.3 General Plan.......................................................................................................................... 42 3.3.4 Multi -use Trails and Bikeway Master Plan............................................................................43 4 Capital Improvements.....................................................................................44 4.1 Future Project Improvements Summary...................................................................................44 4.1.1 Communications System.......................................................................................................44 4.1.2 Roadway Projects..................................................................................................................45 4.1.3 Traffic Signals........................................................................................................................ 46 4.1.4 City Facilities..........................................................................................................................47 5 Technology Trends........................................................................................... 49 5.1 Smart Mobility...........................................................................................................................49 5.1.1 Advanced Traffic Management Systems...............................................................................49 5.1.2 Integrated Corridor Management.........................................................................................50 5.1.3 Connected Vehicle Technology............................................................................................. 50 5.1.4 Smart Parking Systems.......................................................................................................... 51 5.2 Smart Infrastructure..................................................................................................................51 5.2.1 Changeable Message Signs................................................................................................... 51 5.2.2 Automatic License Plate Recognition....................................................................................51 5.2.3 Smart Street Lights................................................................................................................ 52 5.3 Community Engagement...........................................................................................................52 5.4 Cybersecurity.............................................................................................................................53 6 Recommendations...........................................................................................54 6.1 Communication System Topology............................................................................................. 54 6.1.1 Core Layer............................................................................................................................. 55 6.1.2 Distribution Layer..................................................................................................................56 6.1.3 Access Layer.......................................................................................................................... 59 6.1.4 Network Architecture............................................................................................................ 66 6.2 Network Analysis.......................................................................................................................70 6.2.1 Traffic Signal System Bandwidth Calculations......................................................................70 6.2.2 ITSS Facilities Bandwidth Calculations.................................................................................. 72 6.3 Network Standards.................................................................................................................... 74 6.3.1 Communications Protocol Standardization..........................................................................74 6.3.2 Network Configuration.......................................................................................................... 74 6.3.3 Fiber Allocation and Splicing.................................................................................................75 6.4 Infrastructure and Equipment Standards.................................................................................. 76 6.4.1 Communications Infrastructure............................................................................................76 6.4.2 Traffic Signal Cabinet Assemblies and Equipment................................................................77 6.4.3 Communication Hub Assemblies and Equipment.................................................................77 6.4.4 Alternative Communications................................................................................................. 78 6.5 Roles and Responsibilities......................................................................................................... 78 7 Implementation Phasing and Prioritization Plan(IPP).....................................80 7.1 Strategic Deployment Plan........................................................................................................80 7.1.1 Phase 1: Immediate Upgrades (Years 1-3)............................................................................80 7.1.2 Phase 1 Order of Magnitude Costs....................................................................................... 86 7.1.3 Phase 2: Near -Term Upgrades (Years 4-6)............................................................................87 7.1.4 Phase 2 Order of Magnitude Costs....................................................................................... 90 7.1.5 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Years 7-10)............................................................................... 91 7.1.6 Phase 3 Order of Magnitude Costs....................................................................................... 94 7.2 Order of Magnitude Costs......................................................................................................... 95 7.3 Funding Sources......................................................................................................................... 96 7.3.1 Local General Funds and Capital Improvement Program.....................................................96 7.3.2 Development Impact Fees.................................................................................................... 97 7.3.3 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee(TUMF)...................................................................97 7.3.4 Gas Tax.................................................................................................................................. 97 7.3.5 Grants....................................................................................................................................97 7.3.6 California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Rural and Urban Broadband Consortia .............97 7.3.7 California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account .........98 7.3.8 California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program.................................................................................................................................. 99 7.3.9 California Department of Technology (CDT) Digital Equity Act..........................................100 7.3.10 Caltrans Highway Safety Improvement Program(HSIP).................................................100 7.3.11 US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) .......101 7.3.12 USDOT Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART)..............101 7.3.13 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovation(ATTAIN)..........................................................................................................................101 List of Figures Figure1-1: Vicinity Map................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2-1: Existing Communication System Topology Map...................................................................... 26 Figure 3-1: Current Communication System Issues....................................................................................30 Figure 3-2: Communication System Resolutions........................................................................................31 Figure 3-3: ITS and Smart City Applications................................................................................................ 32 Figure 3-4: Communication System Gaps & Obsolete Equipment.............................................................35 Figure 3-5: Citywide Communications Conduit Standards.........................................................................37 Figure 3-6: City Facilities Communications Topology.................................................................................40 Figure 4-1: Capital Improvements Topology...............................................................................................48 Figure 6-1: Communication System Network Architecture Example.........................................................55 Figure 6-2: Backbone Fiber Optic Rings and Hubs Topology...................................................................... 58 Figure 6-3: Traffic Signal System Network Groups Topology.....................................................................62 Figure 6-4: ITSS Facilities System Network Groups Topology..................................................................... 65 Figure 6-5: Traffic Signal Network Architecture......................................................................................... 67 Figure 6-6: ITSS Facilities Network Architecture......................................................................................... 68 Figure 6-7: ITSS Fiber Home -Run Network Architecture Example..............................................................69 Figure 7-1: Phase 1 Immediate Communication Upgrades Topology........................................................85 Figure 7-2: Phase 2 Near -Term Communication Upgrades Topology........................................................89 Figure 7-3: Phase 3 Citywide Buildout Topology........................................................................................ 93 List of Tables Table 2-1: Communications System Roles and Responsibilities.................................................................14 Table 2-2: Copper Wire Interconnect Locations......................................................................................... 15 Table 2-3: Serial Wireless Locations........................................................................................................... 17 Table 2-4: Recent System Upgrade.............................................................................................................18 Table 2-5: Existing Communication Conduit...............................................................................................19 Table 2-6: Existing Fiber Optic Corridors.................................................................................................... 20 Table 2-7: Existing ITSS Facilities................................................................................................................. 23 Table 3-1: Communication System Gaps Locations....................................................................................32 Table 3-2: Missing Fiber Communication Breakout Locations...................................................................33 Table 3-3: Missing Communication Equipment Locations..........................................................................34 Table 3-4: Existing Facilities on Leased Network Lines...............................................................................39 Table 3-5: QLMP Goals and Objectives.......................................................................................................41 Table 4-1: Future Communication Systems................................................................................................44 Table 4-2: Future Roadway Projects...........................................................................................................45 Table 4-3: Future City Facilities...................................................................................................................47 Table6-1: Primary Rings Gaps.................................................................................................................... 56 Table 6-2: Communication Network Hub Locations...................................................................................57 Table 6-3: Traffic Signal System Network Groups....................................................................................... 59 Table 6-4: ITSS Facilities System Network Groups...................................................................................... 63 Table 6-5:ITSS Facilities with Home -Run Fiber Connections......................................................................69 Table 6-6: Traffic Signal System Devices and Data Demands.....................................................................71 Table 6-7: Traffic Signal System Network Groups Data Demand...............................................................71 Table 6-8: Aggregated Data Demands at Hubs for Traffic Signal System Network....................................72 Table 6-9: ITSS Facilities System Network Groups Data Demand...............................................................73 Table 6-10: Aggregated Data Demands for ITSS Facilities System Network...............................................74 Table 7-1: Project 1 Communication Hub Upgrades.................................................................................. 81 Table 7-2: Project 2 Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades....................................................................81 Table 7-3: Project 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades...........................................................................82 Table 7-4: Phase 1 CIP Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades......................................................................82 Table 7-5: Phase 1 CIP Wireless Infrastructure Upgrades..........................................................................83 Table 7-6: Project 4 Wireless Communications at Remote Locations........................................................83 Table 7-7: Phase 1 CIP Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities.................................83 Table 7-8: Project 1 Communication Hub Upgrades Costs.........................................................................86 Table 7-9: Project 2 Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades Costs...........................................................86 Table 7-10: Project 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades Costs...............................................................86 Table 7-11: Project 4 Wireless Communications at Remote Locations Costs............................................87 Table 7-12: Phase 2 CIP Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation..........................................................88 Table 7-13: Phase 2 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities.....................................88 Table 7-14: Project 5 Communication Infrastructure Upgrades at Rancho California Rd, Temecula Pkwy, andWinchester Road Costs........................................................................................................................90 Table 7-15: Project 6 Communication Hub Upgrades Costs.......................................................................90 Table 7-16: Project 7 Fiber Optic Infrastructure at ITSS Facilities Costs.....................................................90 Table 7-17: Phase 3 Fiber Optic Cable Upgrades........................................................................................ 91 Table 7-18: Phase 3 New Fiber Optic Cable and Conduit along Gaps.........................................................91 Table 7-19: Phase 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities.....................................92 Table 7-20: Project 8 Fiber Optic Cable and Communication Conduit Upgrades Costs .............................94 Table 7-21: Project 9 New Fiber Optic Cable and Conduit along Gaps Costs.............................................94 Table 7-22: Project 10 New Communication Hubs Costs........................................................................... 95 Table 7-23: Project 11 Fiber Optic Infrastructure at ITSS Facilities Costs...................................................95 Table 7-24: Phase 1 Deployment Costs...................................................................................................... 95 Table 7-25: Phase 2 Deployment Costs...................................................................................................... 95 Table 7-26: Phase 3 Deployment Costs...................................................................................................... 96 Table 7-27: Deployment Costs by Phase..................................................................................................... 96 Table 7-28: FY2024-2028 CIP Forecasted Revenue.................................................................................... 97 Table 7-29: Grant Funding Programs........................................................................................................ 103 APPENDICIES Appendix A: Existing System Architecture Schematic Appendix B: Communication System Deficiency Identification —Traffic Signal List Appendix C: Traffic Signal System Network Bandwidth Calculations Appendix D: Order of Magnitude Cost Estimates List of Acronyms AB...............................................................................................................................................Assembly Bill ACS................................................................................................................... American Community Survey ALPR....................................................................................................Automated License Plate Recognition APS.....................................................................................................................Accessible Pedestrian Signal ATC........................................................................................................................Advance Traffic Controller ATMS............................................................................................... Advanced Traffic Management Systems ATTAIN....................................................................Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovation ATTIMD ..............................Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovative Mobility Development AV............................................................................................................................................... Audio/Visual BBS........................................................................................................................... Battery Back -Up System BEAD.......................................................................................... Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment BIL............................................................................................................. Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) bps.......................................................................................................................................... Bits per Second Caltrans.......................................................................................... California Department of Transportation CA MUTCD..................................................................California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CASF....................................................................................................... California Advanced Services Funds CCSMP....................................................................................Citywide Communication System Master Plan CCTV......................................................................................................................... Closed -Circuit Television CDT.......................................................................................................California department of Technology CFD..................................................................................................................... Community Facility Districts CIP.................................................................................................................. Capital Improvement Program CISA.................................................................................. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CMS....................................................................................................................... Changeable Message Sign CIVIL) ..............................................................................................................................Conflict Monitor Unit Comm................................................................................................................................... Communications CPUC.................................................................................................... California Public Utilities Commission CV...................................................................................................................................... Connected Vehicle C-V2X.............................................................................................................. Cellular Vehicle -To -Everything C2X.............................................................................................................................. Cellular -To -Everything DIF......................................................................................................................... Development Impact Fees DLA...................................................................................................................... Division of Local Assistance EVPE............................................................................................................. Emergency Vehicle Preemption FCC..................................................................................................... Federal Communications Commission FDU.............................................................................................................................. Fiber Distribution Unit FHWA.......................................................................................................... Federal Highway Administration FiOs................................................................................................................................... Fiber Optic Service FOC...................................................................................................................................... Fiber Optic Cable FSP................................................................................................................................ Freight Signal Priority FY.................................................................................................................................................... Fiscal Year GB...................................................................................................................................................... Gigabyte GHG......................................................................................................................Greenhouse Gas Emissions GIS.............................................................................................................. Geographic Information Systems HOT........................................................................................................................... High -Occupancy Tolling HOV.......................................................................................................................... High Occupancy Vehicle HSIP.................................................................................................. Highway Safety Improvement Program I...................................................................................................................................................... Interstate ICM............................................................................................................ Integrated Corridor Management ID................................................................................................................................................ Identification IIJA................................................................................................... Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act IMS........................................................................................................... Intersection Management System IP......................................................................................................................................... Internet Protocol IPP....................................................................................... Implementation Phasing and Prioritization Plan IT............................................................................................................................Information Technologies ITS.............................................................................................................. Intelligent Transportation System ITSS........................................................................................ Information Technology and Support Services ISP............................................................................................................................ Internet Service Provider LED................................................................................................................................. Light Emitting Diode LF................................................................................................................................................. Linear Foot LPI........................................................................................................................ Leading Pedestrian Interval LRSM............................................................................................................... Local Roadway Safety Manual LRSP...................................................................................................................... Local Roadway Safety Plan MB................................................................................................................................................... Megabyte Mbps........................................................................................................................... Megabits per second MFA...................................................................................................................... Multifactor Authentication MHz................................................................................................................................................ Megahertz MPO................................................................................................................................Multi-Fiber Push On MRC................................................................................................................. Margarita Recreation Center NITA.............................................................National Telecommunications and Information Administration No..................................................................................................................................................... Number NOFO.............................................................................................................. Notice of Funding Opportunity OCR.................................................................................................................Optical Character Recognition PD.................................................................................................................................... Police Department POTS................................................................................................................... Plain Old Telephone Service PVC..................................................................................................................................... Polyvinyl Chloride PW.............................................................................................................................................. Public Works QLMP.................................................................................................................... Quality of Life Master Plan RCTC....................................................................................... Riverside County Transportation Commission RMC..............................................................................................................................Rigid Metallic Conduit RS............................................................................................................................ Recommended Standard SB................................................................................................................................................... Senate Bill SFP................................................................................................................... Small Form Factor Pluggable SHS.............................................................................................................................. State Highway System SIC.......................................................................................................................... Signal Interconnect Cable SMART.............................................................. Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation SMFOC............................................................................................................ Single -Mode Fiber Optic Cable SOPs............................................................................................................. Standard Operating Procedures SPMs................................................................................................................ Signal Performance Measures SR................................................................................................................................................. State Route SS4A....................................................................................................................Safe Street and Road for All TBMP........................................................................................................... Trails and Bikeways Master Plan TCP................................................................................................................. Transmission Control Protocol TOC......................................................................................................................... Traffic Operations Center TSP.................................................................................................................................Transit Signal Priority TUMF................................................................................................ Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee TVE2............................................................................................. Temecula Valley Entrepreneus Exchange USDOT..................................................................................... United States Department of Transportation VPN............................................................................................................................ Virtual Private Network VLAN................................................................................................................... Virtual Local Area Network V2X............................................................................................................................... Vehicle -to -Everything WRCOG......................................................................................Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Summary The City of Temecula has taken a proactive approach to implement a state-of-the-art fiber optic communications system though the development of a Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP). The CCSMP presents a comprehensive strategy to leverage existing fiber optic and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) infrastructure and deploy modern infrastructure, laying the foundation for secure, high-speed, reliable, and future -proof communication networks. This plan aims to revolutionize connectivity, support economic growth, enhance public services, and improve quality of life for residents. The communication system will connect traffic signal infrastructure throughout the City to ITS elements that provide the technology for effective system management, operation, and maintenance. An intelligent traffic system promotes increased roadway safety for all modes of travel, shorter commute times, more reliable travel, a healthier environment, and economic and sustainable growth which are all key ingredients for using ITS infrastructure to maintain a high quality of life for residents. The wide geographical network involved with traffic signal communication systems provides the opportunity to extend Smart City applications across City departments and services. These include connecting to emergency services (police and fire), building facilities such as libraries, community centers, maintenance yards, parks, recreation centers, etc. The CCSMP addresses these opportunities and demonstrates the wide area network topology of connected infrastructure and fiber management and allocation for various uses. The CCSMP purpose is to guide the City's investment and implementation in fiber optic communications and ITS technology. The CCSMP is critical in ensuring the City's current and future communication system needs and objectives are realized through this growth. Need The City of Temecula has a population of 110,0031 and encompasses 37.3 square miles in southwestern Riverside County, California. The City operates and maintains 132 signaled intersections and 395 paved lane miles of public roads. Temecula's transportation system has developed concurrently with the City's physical expansion. Western Riverside County and the City of Temecula have grown rapidly over the past twenty years, with high levels of population growth projected to continue. The City's current communications network technology was built to legacy standards that do not have the capacity to support the growing data demands of the community. Advancements in the digital world have accelerated in recent years, spurred by technology improvements, automation, and the rise in e- commerce, remote work, and online learning. This has put pressure on the City of Temecula to modernize existing assets and utilize technology to streamline government processes and improve City services for residents and businesses. 1 United States Census Bureau, 2020 The City of Temecula has a dedicated Traffic Operations Center (TOC). Most of the City's traffic signals were connected to the TOC through a hybrid mix of copper twisted pair copper, fiber, and wireless systems. Although the City has made a great effort to install communications to 88% of the 132 existing traffic signals over the last 20 years, only 35% are communicating back to the TOC through fiber infrastructure. The copper wire analog network and serial wireless radios systems were considered state- of-the-art and performed reliably at the time they were installed. However, by today's standards, the system technology is outdated, difficult to maintain, and can no longer service the current traffic management system information demands such as real-time video monitoring devices and data gathering applications. The City's Public Works and Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) departments are responsible for planning, building, operating, managing, and maintaining the City's communications system network. Needs identified by both departments are summarized below: • Expansion of the communication system throughout the City. • Pursue available funding opportunities to expand the City's communication system. • Prioritize implementation of fiber infrastructure at City facilities to replace third -party leased network lines within the next three to five years. • Develop a formal planning framework to identify and implement communication projects strategically and leverage projects between both departments. • Develop standard operating procedures (SOPS) for maintaining the communication system, implementing new communication projects, documenting completed projects, communication security protocols, and standard specifications. • Develop a centralized location for communication related documents between ITSS and Public Works departments. • Interactive live citywide map showing existing and planned communication infrastructure readily available to both departments. • Separate communication system networks and equipment between ITSS and Public Works. Purpose, Goals and Objectives The purpose of the Temecula CCSMP is to strategically guide the replacement and expansion of the existing obsolete communications system to provide a citywide network that is capable of meeting municipal operational needs, supporting future growth and advanced technologies, while ensuring resiliency, efficiency, and equity. The plan represents a significant opportunity for the City of Temecula to advance the citywide communication system and supporting elements to the technological forefront. The CCSMP will open doors to opportunities including access to grant funding, coordination with various projects and developments, cost savings, providing a future proof platform, and advancing Smart City and Qualify of Life initiatives. The CCSMP provides a framework for strategically achieving the following goals and objectives: • Evaluate the existing communications system to identify deficiencies. • Identify current and future system needs based on resolutions for existing system deficiencies and stakeholder feedback. • Leverage existing conduit and fiber infrastructure to advance the availability, affordability, and reliability of communications for municipal and community services. • Identify near -term and future planned improvement projects that may be leveraged to bridge communication system gaps and enable expansion of City services. • Evaluate current off -the -shelf technology trends and related applications that the City may choose to implement to ensure the future communication system will be capable of supporting. • Identify key recommendations for designing, implementing, and maintaining an efficient citywide communications network based on reliability, scalability, redundancy, and compatibility. • Develop a plan for phased communications system implementation and prioritization. • Meet the Temecula Quality of Life Master Plan 2040 goals of establishing a broadband master plan and completing fiber optic connections to City facilities. Key Recommendations Key communications systems and ITS element recommendations identified in the Master Plan are summarized below: • Leverage the existing fiber optic backbone to establish communication to remaining traffic signals and facilities with no communication infrastructure. • A redundant fiber optic ring network configuration is recommended for Public Works and ITSS Departments. • The City's core network layer will consist of a backbone fiber ring made up of primary and secondary rings. Provide the following fiber optic deployments in existing and new conduit installations: o Primary rings should be a minimum 288-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. o Secondary rings should be a minimum 144-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. o Linear branch connections should be a minimum 72-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. • Communication hubs will provide access between the fiber backbone ring and network equipment at traffic signal cabinets and ITSS facilities. o Each hub shall be connected to a minimum of two other hubs. o Each hub shall provide communications backhaul to City Hall. • City traffic signals and ITSS facilities are recommended to be organized into separate network groups with each group connected to a minimum of two communication hubs. The use of communication hubs and network groups provides two levels of redundancy: o Devices can communicate with separate hubs if a communication link within the network group fails. o If a communication hub fails, each network group can communicate with the second or third hub. • The traffic signal and ITSS facilities network systems will utilize the same fiber backbone and communication hub network layout and will backhaul to City Hall's Data Center/ Server Room. • The traffic signal and ITSS facilities network systems will be segregated. Each department will have their own dedicated fiber count and layer 3 switch within the Data Center/ Server Room. • The recommended fiber strand allocation for the 288-strand primary fiber optic ring is as follows: o Public Work Department (144 strands of fiber). ■ 36 strands of fiber allocated to the redundant ring network configuration. ■ 108 strands of dark fiber. o ITSS Department (144 strands of fiber) ■ 64 strands of fiber allocated to the home -run fiber network configuration. ■ 36 strands of fiber allocated to the redundant ring network configuration. ■ 44 strands of dark fiber. • Dark fiber strands for each department can be utilized for future network expansion, communication needs, or may be leased out. • Install splice closures to facilitate fiber optic breakout cables to traffic signal cabinets and ITSS facilities. All splicing and splice enclosures shall be underground vaults. Implementation Phasing and Prioritization Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, and communication cabinet infrastructure will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. Implementation of CCSMP recommendations are divided into three phases over a ten-year period which includes immediate, near - term, and full citywide buildout. The timeframe for each phase of implementation is based on available funding and could be accelerated as additional funds are made available. Phase 1: Immediate Upgrades (Years 1-3) Phase 1 improvements provide the City with expanded connectivity to traffic signals along major and secondary arterials. Additionally, improvements will bridge communication gaps and make progress towards the backbone fiber optic rings topology. Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes: • Upgrade fiber distribution units (FDUs) and install splice closures at seven existing communication hubs to accommodate the recommended upsized fiber optic cable. Communication hub upgrades at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue/Old Town Front Street will be prioritized. • Leverage existing underground and communication cabinet infrastructure to install new fiber optic communication media. Locations that require fiber breakout cables and/or communication equipment at traffic signal cabinets will be prioritized next. These are locations along corridors with existing fiber optic infrastructure that are currently not connected to the fiber optic network. • Segments with copper wire media will be upgraded next by utilizing the existing conduit to pull in new fiber. Pull box spacing and conduit sweeps will be upgraded to current fiber optic standards. • Install wireless radios and communication equipment at remaining remote locations to establish communications back to City Hall. Phase 2: Near -Term Upgrades (Years 4-6) Phase 2 of the implementation plan includes: • Prioritize upgrading existing fiber optic infrastructure along Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway, and Winchester Road. o This includes upsizing fiber optic cable (FOC) size, proper fiber allocation, and new splice closures. o Fiber optic infrastructure upgrades at these three corridors are critical as they constitute the majority of the City's primary backbone fiber optic ring. • Fiber distribution units and splice closures at the remaining two existing communication hubs along Winchester Road and Temecula Parkway will be upgraded to accommodate the recommended upsized fiber optic cable. • Three new communication hubs on Rancho California Road/Butterfield Stage Road, Temecula Parkway/Margarita Road-Redhawk Parkway, and Temecula Parkway/Butterfield Stage Road will be included in Phase 2. Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Years 7-10) Buildout of the Citywide communication system network will be completed in Phase 3. • Remaining segments with a low fiber strand count will be upgraded. • New conduit and fiber will be installed along remaining gaps. • New communication hubs will be installed at Butterfield Stage Road/Nicolas Road and at Old Town Front Street/Santiago Road -First Street/ • Remaining ITSS facilities will be connected to the fiber optic communication system network. Order of Magnitude Costs Phase Implementation Years Cost ••.:00 through•04 Grand Total: $22,064,224 The order of magnitude cost estimate for the Citywide Communication System Master Plan is $22,064,904. 1 Introduction As technology advances, municipalities have been embracing the use of communications network infrastructure to connect and coordinate between critical City services. The City of Temecula has invested in a network of fiber optic cables, copper interconnect, wireless radios, and cellular modems to provide communications for essential municipal services including governance, public safety, transportation, recreation, commerce, and education. The City has sought to balance immediate and long-range needs as the existing communications systems have become obsolete and inhibit staff's ability to effectively and efficiently manage vital municipal systems. The Temecula Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP) establishes a robust strategy for establishing the infrastructure, connectivity, and bandwidth necessary to effectively operate and manage the Temecula Public Works and Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) systems and enable new possibilities for Smart City technology solutions. The CCSMP is a central element of the City's planning framework for establishing a proactive approach to establishing a future -proof platform that supports growth and enables to the City to deploy future technologies that will benefit municipal operations, residents, businesses, and other community stakeholders for years to come. 1.1 City Setting The City of Temecula has a population of 110,0032 and encompasses 37.3 square miles in southwestern Riverside County, California. As illustrated in Figure 1-1, Temecula is bounded by the City of Murrieta, unincorporated Riverside County, unincorporated San Diego County, and Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians lands. Temecula operates and maintains 132 signaled intersections and 395 paved lane miles of public roads. The City is traversed north -south by Interstate 15 (1-15) in the western area of the City and California State Route 79 (SR-79) / Temecula Parkway in the southern area of the City. Temecula's transportation system has developed concurrently with the City's physical expansion. Western Riverside County and the City of Temecula have grown rapidly over the past twenty years, with high levels of population growth projected to continue. For context, the City of Temecula's recently adopted Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) 2040 anticipates that private development will add more than 4,000 housing units and 12,000 residents by 2028. 2 United States Census Bureau, 2020 Figure 1-1: Vicinity Map Perris 15 Canyon Lake Lake 0Elsinore 74 c�a Goo Wildomar Hemet Winchester Menifee 15 Murrieta 371 Pacific Ocean Oceanside 79 Riverside County Aguanga San Diego County 15 Fallbrook 76 Vista Hidden Meadows Valley Center Palomar Pauma Mountain Valley 1.2 Regional, State, and National Plans and Architectures 1.2.1 California Broadband for All Action Plan The Broadband for All program was established in 2020 to improve digital connectivity and equity across the State of California. Broadband has become ALL Broadband for All essential for accessing vital services and opportunities and the State has aRaaoe nc 110 commited to enhancing connectivity, access, adoption, and training. The 2020 program includes establishment of the California Broadband For All Action Plan, Middle -Mile Broadband Initiative, and programs for Last -Mile CALIFORNIA BROADBAND FOR ALL Infrastructure and Adoption. The California Broadband for All Action Plan is an overarching plan established by the California Department of Technology's Office of IPwu Broadband and Digital Literacy to address the digital divide and promote equity. The plan identifies long-term goals, actions, and key parties for CALIFok„,A ensuring all Californians have: high-performance broadband available at home, schools, libraries, and businesses; access to affordable broadband and necessary devices; and access to training and support to enable digital inclusion. Development of the CCSMP will be consistent with California Broadband for All Action Plan goals, objectives, and actions for: • Meet broadband definition standards across Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and State grant -funded broadband programs. • Meet broadband speed targets to be eligible for infrastructure subsidies and grants. • Modernize existing systems to support broadband deployment and ongoing maintenance. • Promote connectivity to "unserved" and "underserved" areas. • Establish standards for backhaul resilience and reliability. • Evaluate broadband at service levels for greater accuracy and granularity. • Meet the State's "Dig Smart" policy to install conduit as part of any appropriate and feasible transportation project on strategic corridors. • Identify opportunities to partner with Federal, State, local, and tribal governments, and active philanthropy organizations to leverage funding opportunities. • Partner with governments and broadband providers to enhance permitting processes at all levels. 1.2.2 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Systems Engineering for ITS Handbook Development of the CCSMP will be consistent with regional, state, and national Systems Engineering plans and architectures. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)'s Systems Engineering for Intelligent Systems Regional Arth ieClure Conoept Ergineonng Exploration Management Plan I Master Planning Conoept of 1 O;ierati6n5 system R qui emer High-!_ sign [I Aechit `operations and Ma�nlenanre Systiem Validat on Srralegy i Plante System System VenficaWriRan ValydeU6n ISystem ACceptar" System 9 Sub -System Veri �calion :1 Verification Plan o [Subsyslem Subsystem $ Subsystem o Requirements �� Corrrp6nenl Level DMaile Omit Test Plan —W_ UATestin Saftwai,e Coding Haniware Fabrimlon Im plementatton vedficarion 11 ,7 i Cenlrol Gate 40 Project Time Line Changes Retirement and Rept24emenR Upgrades — Transportation Systems (ITS) Handbook includes the "V" diagram standard. Following the processes reduces risk, controls cost and schedule, improves quality, and results in systems that meet user needs. The CCSMP includes the earliest planning stage of the systems engineering process and presents high- level concepts, architecture, and initial needs identification. The CCSMP provides the framework for capital improvement programming, prioritization, and budgeting for future identified projects through subsequent parts of the systems engineering process. 1.2.3 Southern (-alifornia Ree-ional ITS Architecture The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Southern California Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Architecture, which was recently updated in 2019, provides a planning framework for ensuring that ITS technologies for managing transportation systems are deployed in a coordinated fashion. The Regional ITS Architecture seeks to address ITS projects and deployments that require connectivity and information exchange across the six -county SCAG region, which includes the City of Temecula. The SCAG ITS Architecture and Transportation Planning process illustrates the interrelation between the ITS Architecture and key steps in the transportation planning process. The CCSMP includes the components of the long-range planning process and considerations for ITS throughout identification of vision and goals, alternate improvement strategies, evaluation and prioritization of strategies, and development of the long-range master plan. Lang Range Planning Regional Vision & Goals 9 Improvement (LA:1ternate Stra.te i l capllal Regional ITS Architecture Evaluation & Prioritization of Strategies :3 T o T < a CD CD Development of LongmRange o e C Cr Transportation Ian '—° :3 t"7 Development of Transpartatio Improvement Program Project Development '4% lei 0 System Operation 0� -� 1.2.4 National ITS ArchitecturF The National ITS Architecture provides a definitive and consistent framework for the planning and deployment of ITS. It is comprised of four primary layers: enterprise, functional, physical, and communications. The CCSMP addresses the communication view of the National ITS Architecture, which provides a framework for implementing information flow between physical objects. The communications view incorporates best practices for applications, data exchange, facilities, access, management, and security. The City relies on the communications system to support operation and management for multiple Temecula Public Works and Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) systems. 1.3 Master Plan Mission and Goals Architecture Reference for Cooperative and Intelligent Transportation (ARC -IT) The primary mission of the Temecula CCSMP is to strategically guide the replacement and expansion of the existing obsolete communications system to provide a citywide network that is capable of meeting municipal operational needs, supporting future growth and advanced technologies, while ensuring resiliency, efficiency, and equity. Reliable high-speed broadband communications have become an essential utility for effectively operating, managing, and maintaining traditional City systems and has recently been utilized for more efficient, versatile, and innovative possibilities for public safety, recreation, governance, education, and business. The City of Temecula strives to realize the full potential of broadband and technology innovations to better serve our community. The CCSMP provides a framework for strategically achieving the following goals and objectives: • Evaluate the existing communications system to identify deficiencies. • Identify current and future system needs based on resolutions for existing system deficiencies and stakeholder feedback. • Leverage existing conduit and fiber infrastructure to advance the availability, affordability, and reliability of communications for municipal and community services. • Identify near -term and future planned improvement projects that may be leveraged to bridge communication system gaps and enable expansion of City services. • Evaluate current off -the -shelf technology trends and related applications that the City may choose to implement to ensure the future communication system will be capable of supporting. • Identify key recommendations for designing, implementing, and maintaining an efficient citywide communications network based on reliability, scalability, redundancy, and compatibility. • Develop a plan for phased communications system implementation and prioritization. • Meet the Temecula Quality of Life Master Plan 2040 goals of establishing a broadband master plan and completing fiber optic connections to City facilities. 1.4 Report Organization The Temecula CCSMP is organized as a compilation of six reports, which are described below: • Existing Conditions Assessment — Detailed assessment of the existing communication system infrastructure for connected devices and facilities. Includes geographic information system (GIS) communication topology map and communication network architecture schematic. • Needs Assessment — Detailed assessment of citywide communication system needs based on stakeholder input from the Temecula Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) and Public Works Departments, deficiencies identified from the existing conditions assessment, and City initiatives and goals. • Capital Improvements — Overview of research conducted for documentation from the Temecula Public Works Traffic Engineering Division, ITSS Department, and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to identify future projects that may be leveraged to improve the communication system. Includes capital improvements topology map. • Technology Trends — Overview of current industry technology trends and off -the -shelf technologies and applications that Cities are utilizing their communications systems to support for creating interconnected, sustainable, community -centric environments that can evolve and adapt to meet community needs. Includes smart mobility, smart infrastructure, community engagement, and cybersecurity. • Recommendations — Detailed recommendations for establishing and maintaining a citywide communications network that will be capable of servicing Temecula's current and future needs for facilitating real-time data exchange between City Hall and connected facilities, buildings, and end -user devices. Includes network analysis and recommendations for communication system topology, network standards, infrastructure and equipment standards, and roles and responsibilities for ongoing operation, maintenance, and improvement. • implementation Phasing and Prioritization Plan (IPP) — Detailed plan for implementation phasing and prioritization of improvements to the citywide communications network based on the CCSMP network analysis finding and improvement recommendations. Includes strategic deployment plan, order of magnitude cost estimates, and identification of funding sources. 2 Existing Conditions Assessment This chapter provides a detailed assessment of Temecula's communication system and represents the first step in the process to develop the Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP). The CCSMP will provide the strategic approach to implement a state-of-the-art fiber optic communication system that meets current and future transportation, mobility, and smart city needs. The City has done an excellent job of building the communication systems over the years. The first copper interconnect systems were connected to traffic signals and implemented more than twenty years ago. The City has a dedicated Traffic Operations Center (TOC) for management and control of systems including traffic signals, Closed -Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras, and streetlights. Most traffic signals are connected to the TOC through a hybrid mix of copper twisted pair and recently implemented fiber systems. The first fiber systems were implemented to connect CCTV cameras at key intersections throughout the City. A majority of streetlights communicate via wireless and cellular nodes to a cloud based LightGrid central management system that can be accessed at the TOC. However, the citywide communication systems are dated and built to historical standards, much of which communicate on legacy serial devices. The highest cost fiber optic communications system component is underground conduit, which is the greatest capital value in the communication system investments made over the years. The City roadway network is nearly built -out and communication conduit and cable were built on primary arterials in conjunction with the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and private development projects. This section provides an overview of the existing communication system infrastructure including connected devices and facilities. The existing conditions will be illustrated on a geographic information system (GIs) communication topology map and communication network architecture schematic. The purpose is to assess the potential for the existing network of communication infrastructure and connected devices throughout the City to add value to future Master Plan investments, especially for the installation of fiber optic cable in underground conduit. 2.1 Partnership Public Works Traffic Engineering and Information Technology and Support Services are the primary communication system users. The two departments have partnered to operate, manage, maintain, and develop the communication system. The following section describes the departments roles, responsibilities, and uses for the system. 2.1.1 Public Works Traffic Engineering The Public Works Department is responsible for development and maintenance of City streets, sidewalks, traffic systems, bike lanes, parks, buildings, trails, and drainage facilities; professional engineering oversight of public and private improvement projects; and implementation of erosion/sediment controls and storm water quality measures. The Public Works Department consists of four divisions: Capital Improvement, Land Development, Maintenance, and Traffic Engineering. The Traffic Engineering Division is responsible for day-to-day traffic operations, safety issues, and future transportation needs, including: • Collect and analyze traffic volume data • Establish future traffic signal priorities • Maintain traffic devices inventories • Monitor traffic and implement changes from the TOC • Monitor, maintain, and adjust traffic signal timing • Perform speed surveys • Respond to citizens' requests for traffic control devices • Review accident reports • Review traffic control plans for construction zones • Review traffic signal, signing, and striping plans • Review private development plans for traffic impacts and mitigation measures • Technical support of the Public Traffic/Safety Commission The Traffic Engineering Division uses the communication system to: • Operate and manage signalized intersections from the TOC • Collect traffic data from connected devices • Monitor traffic conditions, system performance, and health • Respond to traffic events including construction, incidents, and special events • Provide CCTV camera streams to the TOC 2.1.2 Information Technologv and Support Services (ITSS) The Information Technology (IT) Department is responsible for planning, developing, implementing, supporting the technology systems and networks and use of media services to increase community involvement throughout the City. The IT Department consists of six divisions: • Enterprise Application Services (EAS) • Geographic Information Systems (GIS) • Media Services • Network Infrastructure • Tech Support • Support Services The IT department uses the fiber optic communication system to: • Connect to City facilities including City Hall, Facility Operations Center (FOC), Temecula Fire Department Stations, Grace Mellman Community Library, and Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library • Facilitate tech support services • Provide CCTV camera streams to desktop computers at City Hall • Remotely control speakers in the Old Town area • Provide the public with data from the City's smart parking facilities at the Old Town parking garage, the Second Street parking lot, and the Sixth Street parking lot 2.1.2 Roles and Activities The Public Works Traffic Engineering Division is responsible for maintaining the fiber optic communication system and edge devices for traffic signals and streetlights throughout the City. Public Works initially troubleshoots offline signals and devices. If further support is needed, on -call contractors are utilized to maintain the fiber communications including controllers, CCTV cameras, fiber optic cable, splicing, and terminations. City Staff technicians are utilized as needed to maintain streetlights and troubleshoot communication issues related to LightGrid. The IT Department is responsible for maintaining the fiber optic communication system for City facilities including City Hall, Facility Operations Center (FOC), Temecula Fire Department Stations, and libraries. For City traffic signals, the department provides configuration and maintenance of the network switches, routers, and CCTV cameras. On -call consultants are utilized for support, including one consultant primarily focused on network security. Both departments participate in new projects that improve the fiber optic communication system. Public Works leads projects that involve new development and public right-of-way improvements including traffic signals. The IT department leads projects that involve City facility tie-ins or network security. Regardless of which department leads each new project, Public Works is responsible for the design of infrastructure improvements, such as conduit, fiber, and establishing communications back to the network backbone. IT is responsible for developing the internet protocol (IP) schema, procuring and configuring network equipment, and security. A summary of the communication system roles and responsibilities is provided in Table 2-1. Table 2-1: Communications System Roles and Responsibilities DepartmentActivity Public Works Citywide communications routed through traffic signal network switches and dedicated traffic fiber strands Fiber Sharing IT Department Dedicated IT fiber strands for communications to City Hall, Temecula Fire Department Stations, and Libraries Public Works Traffic signal fiber, controllers, and edge devices Network Management Network switches, routers, CCTV cameras, and IT Department security Public Works Traffic signal fiber, controllers, and edge devices with on -call contractor support System Maintenance IT Department Network switches, routers, CCTV cameras, and network security with on -call consultant support Activity Department Design for infrastructure improvements (conduit, Public Works fiber, etc.) and connections to communications Capital Improvement backbone IT Department Develop IP schema and procure / configure network equipment during implementation 2.2 Legacy Communication Systems The City's communication system was built over several decades with continued improvement and expansion through today. The initial builds were state-of-the-art at the time but are now dated and incapable of supporting modern ITS technologies and smart city applications. Much of the legacy systems have recently been replaced with modern network technology. The legacy systems consist of a copper wire based analog multi -drop network, serial digital wireless radios, and analog fiber optic lines network. The existing legacy systems are described in the following subsections. 1.2.1 Copper Wire Analog Network The City's original traffic signal interconnect cable (SIC) system was 19-gauge 12-pair twisted copper cables. This network replicated the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) communication networks. The twisted pair is daisy chained from intersection to intersection and connected to multi -drop modems. The modems are configured as master or remote and run serial 1,200 bits per second (bps). This network communicates status, synchronizes clocks, and provides slow data transmission to legacy controllers via RS-232 Communication Protocol. In the early 2000's the City began installing fiber infrastructure on primary arterials to connect CCTV camera feeds back to City Hall. Over the last year, the City began interconnecting traffic signals along primary arterials utilizing the existing fiber infrastructure that was installed for CCTV cameras. The remaining copper wire network is located on minor arterials and collector streets and is bridged to the fiber network through media converters. The remaining copper wire interconnect locations are listed on Table 2-2. Table 2-2: Copper Wire Interconnect Locations ID 6 Intersection Butterfield Stage Rd & Pauba Rd Media Copper Protocol TCP/IP 7 Butterfield Stage Rd & Royal Crest PI -Rothenberg Dr Copper RS-232 8 Butterfield Stage Rd & Crowne Hill Dr Copper TCP/IP 9 Butterfield Stage Rd & De Portola Rd Copper TCP/IP 11 Butterfield Stage Rd & Wolf Store Rd Copper TCP/IP 13 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nighthawk Pass Copper TCP/IP 14 Campanula Way & Camino Del Sol Copper TCP/IP 15 Campanula Way East & De Portola Rd Copper RS-232 16 Date St & Lakeview Rd Copper TCP/IP 17 Date St & Kingwood Rd Copper RS-232 18 Dear Hollow Rd & Peach Tree Ln-Via La Colorada Copper RS-232 ... 19 Deer Hollow Rd & Peppercorn Dr -Jon William Way-Anza Rd Copper TCP/IP 23 Jefferson Ave & Overland Dr Copper TCP/IP 24 Jefferson Ave & Via Montezuma Copper TCP/IP 25 Jefferson Ave & Del Rio Rd Copper TCP/IP 26 Margarita Rd & Date St Copper RS-232 27 Margarita Rd & Rustic Glen Dr-Harveston School Copper RS-232 28 Margarita Rd & Harveston Way Copper RS-232 29 Margarita Rd & Winco Dwy Copper TCP/IP 30 Margarita Rd & Verdes Ln Copper RS-232 31 Margarita Rd & North General Kearny Rd Copper TCP/IP 32 Margarita Rd & Overland Dr Copper RS-232 33 Margarita Rd & Solana Ridge -Abbot Copper RS-232 34 Margarita Rd & Solana Way Copper TCP/IP 35 Margarita Rd & Stonewood Copper RS-232 36 Margarita Rd & Moraga Rd Copper RS-232 37 Margarita Rd & Avenida Barca Copper RS-232 38 Margarita Rd & La Serena Way Copper TCP/IP 39 Margarita Rd & Yukon Rd -Honors Dr Copper TCP/IP 41 Margarita Rd & Pauba Rd Copper TCP/IP 42 Margarita Rd & Santiago Rd Copper TCP/IP 43 Margarita Rd & Pio Pico Rd Copper TCP/IP 48 Meadows Pkwy & Pauba Rd Copper RS-232 49 Meadows Pkwy & McCabe Dr -Sunny Meadows Dr Copper RS-232 50 Meadows Pkwy & Leena Way Copper RS-232 51 Meadows Pkwy & De Portola Rd Copper RS-232 52 Meadows Pkwy & Campanula Way Copper RS-232 53 Nicolas Rd & Rancho Temecula Town Ctr Copper TCP/IP 54 Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd Copper TCP/IP 55 Vail Ranch Pkwy & Nighthawk Pass Copper TCP/IP 59 Overland Dr & Nicole Lane -Promenade Way Copper RS-232 60 Pauba Rd & Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 Copper TCP/IP 63 Pechanga Pkwy & Rainbow Canyon Rd Copper TCP/IP 64 Pechanga Pkwy & Muirfield Dr Copper RS-232 65 Pechanga Pkwy & Loma Linda Rd Copper TCP/IP 66 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr North Copper RS-232 67 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd -Via Eduardo Copper TCP/IP 68 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechange Casino Dr North Copper TCP/IP 69 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Casino Dr South Copper RS-232 70 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Resort Dr-Minimart Copper TCP/IP 71 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr South Copper RS-232 72 Pechanga Pkwy & Deer Hollow Way Copper TCP/IP 116 Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek North -South Copper RS-232 122 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall Ring North Copper RS-232 123 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall Ring South Copper RS-232 124 intersection IN Ynez Rd & Overland Dr Medily Copper Protocol TCP/IP 125 Ynez Rd & Motor Car Pkwy Copper RS-232 126 Ynez Rd & Solana Way Copper RS-232 127 Ynez Rd & Ynez Court-DLR Dr Copper RS-232 128 Ynez Rd & Town Center -Tower Plaza North Copper TCP/IP 129 Ynez Rd & Town Center -Tower Plaza South Copper TCP/IP 130 Ynez Rd & Tierra Vista Rd Copper TCP/IP 131 Ynez Rd & Rancho Vista Rd Copper TCP/IP 132 Ynez Rd & Pauba Rd Copper TCP/IP 133 Ynez Rd & Santiago Rd Copper TCP/IP 2.2.2 Serial `AI;,-'-,, D,,4;-, Serial wireless radios were installed at six traffic signal locations along Butterfield Stage Road and Redhawk Parkway over 10 years ago. The traffic signal locations along these corridors are in remote areas of the City and radios were installed as a cost saving alternative to installation of underground interconnect infrastructure. The serial wireless radios are 900 megahertz (MHz) low bandwidth data rates and, like the copper wire analog network, they communicate status, synchronize clocks, and provide slow data transmission to legacy controllers. Existing serial wireless radios are experiencing communications issues resulting in offline status. Radios have outlasted their lifecycle and are due for replacement. The serial wireless radio locations are listed on Table 2-3. Table 2-3: Serial Wireless Locations 11 IntersectionID Butterfield Stage Rd & Wolf Store Rd 12 Butterfield Stage Rd & Welton Way -Channel St 13 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nighthawk Pass 88 Redhawk Pkwy & Via Rio Temecula -Wolf Store Rd 89 Redhawk Pkwy & Overland Trail-Paseo Parallon 90 Redhawk Plwy & Vail Ranch Pkwy .2.3 Analog Aber Optic Network In the early 2000's the City began to install fiber optic cable along on primary arterials including Jefferson Avenue, Pechanga Parkway, Temecula Parkway, Ynez Road, Rancho California Road, and Winchester Road. Existing conduit with SIC interconnect was utilized to pull in the new fiber. Analog CCTV cameras were connected point-to-point on a single fiber strand. The data for CCTV control was connected to an RS-400 series data interface, the video was connected to a coaxial interface, and the encoded signal transmitted over the single fiber to the TOC where it was decoded and displayed. Existing traffic signal controllers and cabinet equipment were not connected to the fiber network. Video transmission technology was upgraded to Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) in 2018 and 2022. 2.3 Current Fiber Optic System The City has recently implemented upgrades to the fiber optic system and leveraged existing fiber optic cable to connect to building facilities, traffic signals, and remote systems for surveillance and parking. This section describes the recent upgrades, underground infrastructure, fiber optic cable, and above ground infrastructure. 2.3.1 Recent System Upgrade Through Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 9 grant funding, the City recently upgraded the fiber optic system and communication equipment along Temecula Parkway, Rancho California Road, and Winchester Road. New 24-strand single mode fiber optic trunk cable (SMFOC) was installed along Rancho California Road and Winchester Road in a mix of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and rigid metallic conduit (RMC) to bridge gaps in the existing fiber system. New 12-strand fiber breakout cables were installed to connect to traffic signal cabinets to allow network devices, such as the ethernet switches, traffic signal controllers, and IP conflict monitors, to communicate with the TOC. The conduit for the new 24-strand fiber trunk segments is summarized in Table 2-4 below. Table 2-4: Recent Rancho California Rd Business Park Drive to Diaz Road Existing 2" and 3" PVC Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway New 3" PVC Meadows Parkway to Butterfield Stage Road Existing 2" RMC Winchester Rd Diaz Road to Jefferson Avenue Existing 2" and 3" RMC Additional improvements are summarized below: • Existing pull boxes with splice closures upgraded to new #6. • New 1U fiber distribution units (FDUs) for new 12-strand fiber break out cables. • New ethernet switches. • New advanced transportation controller (ATC) FLeX controllers with Omni -ex software. • New 2010 ECLip conflict monitors. • New CCTV cameras. 2.3.2 Underground Infrastructurr The underground communication infrastructure consists of conduit, pull boxes and splice closures. These system components facilitate installation of fiber optic cable in the ground. Older builds were constructed to SIC standards and newer builds to fiber optic standards. The following subsections describe the underground system components. Conduit Communication conduit utilized for both copper and fiber interconnect are a mix of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and rigid metallic conduit (RMC), with conduit diameters ranging from 2-inch to 3-inch. The conduit built to outdated SIC standards has 90-degree sweeps into pull boxes with the conduit ends spaced close to the pull box lid. The narrow sweeps and tight spacing in the pull box are not ideal for fiber optic cable. The more recent conduit was designed to current fiber optic standards with 45-degree sweeps into pull boxes and 16-inches minimum clearance around conduit ends. The communication conduit attributes are listed on Table 2-5. Table 1 Z-5: Existing CorridorID Winchester Rd Communication Conduit Diaz Rd to Jefferson Ave Conduit RMC Conduit 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 2 Jefferson Ave to Ynez Rd RMC 1.5" 24-Strand SMFOC 3 Ynez Rd to Roripaugh Rd RMC 3" 24-Strand SMFOC 4 Roripaugh Rd to Nicolas Rd RMC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 5 Rancho California Rd Diaz Rd to Town Center RMC 3" 24-Strand SMFOC 6 Town Center to Margarita Rd RMC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 7 Margarita Rd to Meadows Pkwy PVC 3" 24-Strand SMFOC 8 Meadows Pkwy tRoButterfield Stage d RMC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 10 Temecula Pkwy Bedford Ct to La Paz St PVC/RMC 3"/2" 24-Strand SMFOC 11 La Paz St to Butterfield Stage Rd RMC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 12 Margarita Rd Rancho California Rd to Pio Pico Rd PVC 3" 24-Strand SMFOC 13 Pio Pico Rd to Dartolo Rd RMC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC 14 Dartolo Rd to Temecula Pkwy RMC 2" 36-Strand SMFOC 15 Rancho Way Business Park Dr to Diaz Rd PVC 2" 12-Strand SMFOC 16 BusineDsr Park Rancho Way to Diaz Rd PVC 2" 24-Strand SMFOC Pull Boxes Communication pull boxes are placed along conduit runs to facilitate pulling cable. The pull boxes are utilized for both copper and fiber interconnect and are typically Caltrans standard size number five (No. 5) concrete pull boxes with 200-feet spacing. The more recent pull boxes located on Rancho California Road from Margarita Road to Meadows Parkway were designed to current fiber optic standards and are Caltrans standard size number six (No. 6) with 600-feet spacing. Splice Closures Splice closures provide protection where fiber optic cable is opened to connect two cables together, typically in proximity of a traffic signal cabinet or a building. The splice closure is in a pull box where the trunk cable is spliced to a branch, or breakout, cable which enters the facility. Splice closures are typically housed in size number 6 pull boxes both with and without extensions. Vaults are not currently used for fiber optic splice closures. ? 3.3 Cable and Above Ground Infrastructure Cable and above ground infrastructure consists of fiber optic cable, splice cabinets, and communication cabinets. Above ground infrastructure are the system components where splicing and connection to devices occur. The following subsections describe the cable and above ground system components. Fiber Optic Cable Existing fiber optic cable is single mode comprised of 24-strand SMFOC between traffic signal intersections on Jefferson Avenue, Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway, Margarita Road, Winchester Road, and Ynez Road. There is also 48-strand SMFOC on Butterfield Stage Road between Ave Lestonnac and Murrieta Hot Springs which is spliced with the 24-strand trunk cable on Rancho California Road. The fiber optic cable is spliced to a smaller 6 or 12-strand breakout cable that enters traffic signal cabinets and building facilities such as fire stations, libraries, parks, and other City facilities. There are a few remaining segments within the City with fiber optic cable that connects CCTV cameras but bypasses traffic signal cabinets. Additionally, there is existing 2-inch PVC conduit with 24-strand SMFOC on Ynez Road/La Paz Street between Temecula Parkway and Rancho California Road owned by the City. The conduit and fiber were installed in the early 2000s by a telecommunications company as part of a regional fiber project. There were no fiber breakout cables installed to traffic signal cabinets along the corridor. Table 2-6 summarizes the existing fiber corridors, fiber strands, and total traffic signals and CCTV cameras connected to the fiber system. Tnhip 7-6- Fxictinn Fihvr nntir rnrridnrc CorridorConnected Connecte Butterfield 48-strand Traffic Signals CCTVs Ave Lestonnac to Murrieta Hot Springs 5 4 Stage Rd SFMOC Business Park Dr/Rancho Rancho California Rd to Rancho Way 24-strand 0 1 SMFOC Way 24-strand Jefferson Ave Rancho California Rd to Winchester Rd 0 1 SMFOC 6-strand Jefferson Ave Winchester Rd to Sanborn Ave 0 0 SMFOC 36-strand Margarita Rd Temecula Pkwy to De Portola Rd 2 1 SMFOC 24-strand Margarita Rd De Portola Rd to Rancho Vista Rd 0 0 SMFOC 24-strand Margarita Rd Rancho Vista Rd to Rancho California Rd 1 1 SMFOC North General Kearny Rd to 24-strand Margarita Rd 0 1 Winchester Rd SMFOC Old Town Front Frist St/Santiago Rd to Rancho California 72-strand 1 0 St Rd SMFOC Corridor Rancho Business Park Dr -Ridge Park Dr to 24-strand Traffic Signals CCTVs California Rd Butterfield Stage Rd SMFOC 15 10 Promenade Mall N to 24-strand Ring Rd 1 3 Promenade Mall E SMFOC 24-strand Temecula Pkwy Bedford Ct to Butterfield Stage Rd 12 8 SMFOC 24-strand Pechanga Pkwy Deer Hollow Way to Temecula Pkwy 0 3 SMFOC 24-strand Winchester Rd Diaz Rd to Nicolas Rd 9 7 SMFOC Ynez Rd/La Paz 24-strand Temecula Pkwy to Rancho California Rd 0 0 St SMFOC 24-strand Ynez Rd Overland Dr to Winchester Rd 0 1 SMFOC Equity Dr to Temecula Center Dr -Waverly 24-strand Ynez Rd 3 1 Ln SMFOC Connected equipment at traffic signals includes controllers, Ethernet switches, and conflict monitor units (CMUs). All fiber trunk cables are routed to the communication cabinet at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue -Old Town Front Street which is then routed to the City's TOC. Splice Cabinet A standalone fiber optic splice cabinet is located at the Rancho California Rd and Diaz Rd/Vincent Moraga Dr intersection. The cabinet is a Type 334 which is a modified Type 332 standard traffic signal cabinet stripped of the signal assemblies. The cabinet only contains a splice housing with splice trays and does not contain patch panels or communication devices. Cross Connect Communication Cabinet Type 334 cross connect communication cabinets house fiber termination equipment, including distribution units with splice trays and patch panels, and IT network switch gear connected to CCTV cameras. Existing fiber optic trunk cables enter the cross connect cabinet and are fully terminated on the patch panels. This allows fiber strands to be interconnected or cross connected to facilitate communication between various network devices. Cross connect communication cabinets that house multiple fiber trunk cables are located at the following ten intersections: • Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue -Old Town Front Street • Rancho California Rd and Ynez Rd • Rancho California Rd and Margarita Rd (shared traffic signal cabinet) • Temecula Pkwy and Pechanga Pkwy • Winchester Rd and Jefferson Avenue • Winchester Rd and Ynez Rd • Winchester Rd and Margarita Rd • Winchester Rd and Nicolas Rd • Ynez Rd and Overland Dr There are three additional communication cabinets that house distribution units with splice trays and patch panels at Jefferson Ave/Overland Rd, Rancho Way/Diaz Rd, and Temecula Pkwy/Bedford Ct. A single fiber trunk cable is terminated in these cabinets and doesn't provide interconnection or cross connection to another fiber trunk cable. 2.4 Network Devices The communication system connects to a variety of network devices that are managed by the Public Works and IT departments. This section describes the ITS and IT connected devices. 2.4.1 ITS Elements The Public Works Traffic Engineering Department uses the communications system to connect to devices at signalized intersections. Connected devices are monitored, managed, and controlled from the TOC. Devices at traffic signals include advanced transportation controller (ATC) traffic signal controllers, conflict monitor units (CMU), emergency vehicle preemption (EVPE) discriminator modules, battery backup systems (BBS), and accessible pedestrian signal (APS) pushbutton systems. CCTV cameras provide video to the TMC to monitor traffic conditions and respond to events. City staff monitor system health, operation, and performance via the connected devices. ITS network device elements include: • Axis Q6135-LE CCTV (PTZ) cameras (latest) • Axis brand CCTV cameras (older) • Aruba 2930M communication cabinet switches • Cisco IE-4000-4S8P4G-E traffic signal cabinet switches (HSIP project limits) The Traffic Engineering Department also maintains school zone flashers and radar speed feedback signs. School zone flashers currently do not have any communications back to the TOC. Schedules for school zone flashers have to be physically downloaded at each sign via a USB. Older radar speed feedback signs have no communications back to the TOC. Newer radar feedback signs are Traffic Logix and communicate to Traffic Logix's web -based cloud server via cellular communications. The cloud server allows for real time monitoring and data analytics. 2.4.2 11 I-acilitie� The IT department utilizes the citywide communications system to connect to the City's CCTV camera network, speakers in the Old Town area, and smart parking facilities. The City utilizes Open Space Smart Parking by Logix at three public parking facilities in the Old Town area, which include the Old Town Parking Garage, 2nd Street Parking Lot, and the 6th Street Parking Lot. The Open Space server at each parking lot communicates to Logix's cloud server via cellular communications and reports real-time data. Table 2-7. Existing ITSS Facilities Name Civic Center Address 41000 Main St Network City Fiber 1132a2a 1GB Civic Center Traffic Control Center 41000 Main St City Fiber 1GB Field Operations Center 43230 Business Park Dr City Fiber 1GB Old Town Parking Structure 28690 Mercedes St City Fiber 1GB Temecula Duck Pond 28250 Ynez Rd City Fiber 1GB Temecula Library 30600 Pauba Rd City Fiber 1GB Temecula Park & Ride 30100 Temecula Pkwy City Fiber 1GB Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange(Tve2) 43200 Business Park Dr City Fiber 1GB Pd Old Town Station 28690 Mercedes St #B City Fiber 1GB Fire Station 84 30650 Pauba Road City Fiber 1GB Community Recreation Center 30875 Rancho Vista Rd E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Help Center 28816 Pujol St E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Margarita Community Park 29119 Margarita Rd E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Mary Phillips Senior Center 41845 6th St E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Old Town 6th Street Restroom 41952 6th St E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 32380 Deer Hollow Way E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Ronald Reagan Sports Park 30875 Rancho Vista Rd E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Rotary Park 28816 Pujol St E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Sam Hicks Monument Park 41970 Moreno Rd E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Temecula History Museum 28314 Mercedes St E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Temecula Skate Park 42569 Margarita Rd E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Pd Mall Storefront 40820 Winchester Rd E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Pd Southwest Station 30755 Auld Rd E-Lines 100MB EPLAN Old Town Community Theater 42051 Main St VPN Sec - FiOs 1GB Pennypickle's Workshop 42081 Main St VPN Sec - FiOs 1GB 2.5 Central Systems The City's central systems are housed in City Hall and include the City Data Center/Server Room, the Genetec Security Surveillance System, the Traffic Operations Center/Data Room, and the Transparity Intersection Management System (IMS). 2.5.1 IT Data center Citywide fiber optic communication data is delivered to the City Hall Data Center/Server Room via a 72- strand fiber optic trunk cable routed from the communication hub at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue -Old Town Front Street. The fiber optic trunk cable is routed to City Hall via Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street and enters the facility through conduit. The fiber optic trunk cable bypasses the TOC and is landed on communication racks utilizing multi -fiber push on (MPO) connectors in IT's Server Room. The City CCTV camera system is managed by the Genetec Security Surveillance System. The Genetec software displays video on the TOC video wall and on desktop computers which provide City staff the ability to view CCTV camera footage on geo-localized maps and review automated video analytics. I S.2 Traffic Operations Center/ Data Roorr City Hall was built with a TOC and supporting data room back in 2008. The TOC was upgraded in 2018 to include a new state-of-the-art video wall and new traffic servers. The Traffic Engineering Department is currently utilizing Transparity IMS traffic management software to monitor the health of signals, update signal timing when necessary, and manage event logs. Additionally, the Traffic Engineering Department monitors and manages streetlights, radar feedback signs, and smart parking through web -based cloud servers. 2.6 Communication System Topology Map The fiber optic communication system covers 16 miles of roadway, including 10 miles on primary arterials, and connects 48 signalized intersections. A map of the communication system topology is provided in Figure 2-1. A general overview of the fiber optic network follows: • The fiber optic communication network is homed at the City Hall server room. The network largely consists of 24-strand SMFOC trunk/feeder cabling along City's primary arterials with 12-strand or 6-strand SMFOC distribution/branch cables to City facilities and traffic signals. Intermediate cross- connect/communication hub cabinets are located at major roadway junctions. • A 72-strand SMFOC backbone extends out from the City Hall server room to the network main cross -connect (MC)/communication hub located at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue - Old Town Front Street. The MC/communication hub is an above ground Type 334 cabinet with two fiber distribution units (FDU) and two fiber ethernet switches. One FDU distributes fiber optic cabling routed to City Hall and the other distributes incoming fiber from the field/rest of the network. • From the MC/communication hub at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue -Old Town Front Street, a 24-strand SMFOC trunk cable routes north along Jefferson Avenue and another 24- strand SMFOC routes east along Rancho California Road. Additionally, another 24-strand SMFOC routes west along Rancho California Road and then north along Diaz Road to Rancho Way. • The northbound Jefferson Avenue trunk cable extends to an intermediate cross -connect (IC) communication hub at Jefferson Avenue and Winchester Road. A 24-strand SMFOC routes along Winchester Road from Diaz Road to Nicolas Road with IC communication hubs located at Winchester Road/Ynez Road and Winchester Road/Margarita Road • The northbound Jefferson Avenue trunk cable provides communications to CCTV cameras along the following corridor limits: o Jefferson Avenue between Rancho California Road to Sanborn Avenue o Winchester Road between Diaz Road and Nicolas Road o Margarita Road between N. General Kearny Road and Winchester Road o Ring Road between Promenade Mall North and Promenade Mall West • The eastbound Rancho California Road 24-strand trunk cable backhauls communications for the following fiber segments: o Rancho California Road between Jefferson Avenue/Old Town Front Street and Ynez Road (24-strand SMFOC) o Rancho California Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road (24-strand SMFOC) o Rancho California Road between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road (24-strand SMFOC) o Butterfield Stage Road between Rancho California Road and Murrieta Hot Springs (combination of 48-strand and 24-strand SMFOC) o Margarita Road between Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway (24-strand SMFOC) o Temecula Parkway between Bedford Court and Butterfield Stage Road (24-strand SMFOC) • The westbound Rancho California Road 24-strand trunk cable backhauls communications for the following fiber segments: o Rancho California Road between Jefferson Avenue/Old Town Front Street to Business Park Drive/Ridge Park Dr. o Diaz Road between Rancho California Road to Rancho Way. 2.7 System Architecture Schematic The fiber system architecture is comprised of a combination of "bus" and "collapsed ring" network topology. The bus network topology is linear, and two fiber strands are used to connect every node or network switch/routing device in series with an end point. The bus line is not fault tolerant and a single break will cause downstream communication failure. The collapsed ring topology eliminates a single point of failure by using four fibers rather than two. Each network device is connected to two fibers and a device on each side, and a second pair of fibers connects at the end. In the case of a fiber break, communication will continue to flow. The collapsed ring provides redundancy in the absence of a geographical ring. An overview of the network defined by corridor segments follows: • Winchester Road: Diaz Road to Nicolas Road — Collapsed ring network topology from Diaz Road • Jefferson Avenue: Rancho California Road to Sanborn Avenue — Bus network topology branching out from Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue MC. Collapsed ring topology achievable by fiber cabling patching at cross -connect cabinets. • Ring Road — Bus network topology branching from Winchester Road and Ynez Road. Collapsed ring topology achievable by fiber cabling patching at cross -connect cabinets. • Rancho California Road — Multiple collapsed rings linearly down the corridor consisting of two to five signals per ring segment by fiber patching at cross -connect cabinets. • Margarita Road — Bus topology branching out from Rancho California Road and Margarita Road. Geographical or collapsed ring topology achievable by fiber patching at Temecula Parkway and Margarita Road. • Temecula Parkway — Multiple logical rings linearly down the corridor consisting of two to five signals per ring segment. Geographical ring topology achievable (Rancho California Road, Margarita Road, Temecula Parkway, and Ynez Road) by fiber patching at cross -connect cabinets. • Pechanga Parkway — Bus ring topology branching from Temecula Parkway. The existing system architecture schematic may be found in Appendix A. 3 Needs Assessment This chapter provides a detailed assessment of the City of Temecula's communication system needs. It represents the second step in the master plan process, following the existing conditions assessment report, in the development of the Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP). The existing communications network technology was built to legacy standards that do not have the capacity to support the growing data demands of the community and enable the Temecula Public Works and Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) Departments to effectively support them. Advancements in the digital world have accelerated in recent years, spurred bytechnology improvements, automation, and the rise in e-commerce, remote work, and online learning. This has put pressure on the City of Temecula to modernize existing assets and utilize technology to streamline government processes and improve City services for residents and businesses. The purpose of this needs assessment report is to synthesize detailed analysis of the City's existing communication network and the systems management and operation relationship between the Temecula Public Works and ITSS Departments into a consolidated report that identifies a framework to address and resolve system needs. 3.1 Stakeholder Outreach Outreach was conducted to the City Departments that are responsible for planning, building, operating, managing, and maintaining the City's communications system network. These are the Public Works and Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) Departments. The objective of stakeholder outreach is to engage the PW and ITSS staff to gather input and understand their needs and concerns, determine strengths and vulnerabilities within the existing infrastructure, determine capabilities and resources, what processes work well and what could be improved, identify potential issues and risks, and generate support for the CCSMP within City departments. Stakeholder input was gathered through in -person meetings, an online questionnaire in early 2023, and documentation review and comment. Discussions included the following topics: • Goals and priorities. • Current process and procedures on project delivery, system maintenance, and funding. • Roles and responsibilities of each department. • Technical considerations including subsystems, required tools, and future technology implementation. Information and feedback from the discussions revealed a variety of current and future system needs and opportunities and are summarized in the following subsections. 3.1.1 Information Technology and Support Services Department The Temecula Information Technology and Support Services Department (ITSS) Department is comprised of six divisions, including four that have responsibilities related to the citywide communications system: 1. Infrastructure: Division responsible for citywide surveillance systems, security systems, telecommunications system, and network and system administration. 2. Tech Support: Division responsible for Help Desk responses, computer support, inventory management, and technology support for Public Safety and City libraries. 3. Enterprise Application Services: Division responsible for creating and maintaining catalog of enterprise systems, report annual updates, application support, report development, and end user training. 4. Geographic Information Systems: Division responsible for mapping and database administration for the citywide communications network. The City's ITSS department is responsible for improvements, maintenance, acceptance and testing, inspection, and purchasing surveillance and network equipment for both inside plant and outside plant. The ITSS department is also responsible for hardware and software system deployment and support for all the City's network infrastructure equipment. The ITSS department uses the communication system to connect to City -owned facilities (City Network), surveillance cameras, and public Wi-Fi throughout Old Town and Temecula's Public Library. There are defined equipment standards (i.e. cameras, cabling, power, etc.) and security standards for network devices in place. Funding for communication improvements is obtained through the City's annual operating budget, Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and by leveraging funds from other departments such as Public Works and the Police Department to deploy equipment. Current department goals related to the City's communication system include: 1. Network Security 2. Citywide connectivity and reach. 3. Owned versus leased infrastructure. 4. Improved network speeds. 3.1.2 Public Works Department The Temecula Public Works Department is comprised of four divisions, including three which have responsibility for the citywide communications system: 1. Capital Improvement Program: Division responsible for administration of the City's 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), which includes communications infrastructure improvements on CIP Circulation and Infrastructure projects. 2. Traffic Engineering: Division responsible for day-to-day operation and maintenance of the traffic signal communications network and fiber communication infrastructure along City roadways. 3. Public Works Maintenance: Division responsible for communications system maintenance. The traffic engineering division is responsible for improvements, maintenance, acceptance and testing, inspection, and purchasing communications equipment for field elements (outside plant). They are also responsible for maintaining the central systems at the Traffic Operations Center (TOC). The communication system is utilized for traffic signal management and operations, data collection from connected devices, monitoring traffic conditions from the TOC through closed circuit television (CCTV) camera feeds, and monitoring system performance and health. Funding for communication improvements is through the City's annual operating budget, CIP, and Federal, State, and Regional grant programs. Current department goals for the City's communications system include: 1. Connectivity to traffic signal infrastructure 2. Smart management of the traffic system 3. Response times 4. System health 5. Data analysis and performance 3.1.3 IT'-- and Puhlic Works Communication Svstem Needs Communication system needs for both the City's ITSS and Public Work departments were identified based on input provided during meetings and on questionnaires. Summaries are provided on Figure 3-1 which illustrates the issues associated with the current communication system and Figure 3-2 which illustrates resolutions desired to address the communications system issues. Figure 3-1: Current Communication System Issues 1. Limitations (Reach or Capacity) J 2. Downtime or Reliability 3. Upkeep (Operations & Maintenance) 4. Funding 5. Age of Assets 6. Lack of Strategic Plan 7. Security 8. Human Resources (Qualified Staff) 9. Records Figure 3-2: Communication System Resolutions Expanded Connectivity Improved Service (Uptime & Capacity) Prioritized Implementation Plan Reduce Reliance on 3rd Party Services Modern Technology 25% Funding Streams 25% System Documentation 25% 50% 75% 75% Needs identified by both ITSS and Public Works departments are summarized below: 100% • Expansion of the communication system throughout the City. • Pursue available funding opportunities to expand the City's communication system. • Prioritize implementation of fiber infrastructure at City facilities to replace third -party leased network lines within the next three to five years. • Develop a formal planning framework to identify and implement communication projects strategically and leverage projects between both departments. • Develop standard operating procedures (SOPS) for maintaining the communication system, implementing new communication projects, documenting completed projects, communication security protocols, and standard specifications. • Develop a centralized location for communication related documents between ITSS and Public Works departments. • Interactive live citywide map showing existing and planned communication infrastructure readily available to both departments. • Separate communication system networks and equipment between ITSS and Public Works. Input was solicited from both departments for desired Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and Smart City applications. Figure 3-3 illustrates the needs identified. Figure 3-3: ITS and Smart City Applications Smart Parking & Fare Collection Real -Time Traffic Conditions 75% Surveillance 75% Connected Vehicles 50% Smart Streetlights 50% Public Wi-Fi 50% AV Media Systems 50% License Plate Recognition 25% Managing Services Online 1 25% Software as a Service 1 25% Internet of Things 1 25% EV Charging Public Information 0% Smart Garbage Cans 0% Billing Systems 0% Cloud & Data Management 0% 3.2 Communication System Deficiency Identification 100% Deficiency identification is a critical step in the master planning process to prioritize immediate, near - term, and future communication system needs. Communication system deficiencies have been identified for communication gaps, obsolete and malfunctioning equipment, dated standards, central systems, field elements, and leased facilities. 3.2.1 Gaps Communication system gap deficiencies were identified through analysis of the Existing Communication System Topology GIs Map. Although the City has made a great effort to install communications to 88% of the 132 existing traffic signals over the last 20 years, only 35% are communicating back to the TOC through fiber infrastructure. There are 10 traffic signals identified that are located in more remote areas of the City that lack communication infrastructure and are listed in Table 3-1 below. Table % 46 3-1: Communication System Gaps Locations Intersection Meadows Pkwy & La Serena Way 47 Meadows Pkwy & Rancho Vista Rd 56 North General Kearny Rd & Camino Campos Verdes 61 Pauba Rd & Via Rami/Linfield Way 87 Rancho Vista Rd & Mira Loma Dr 91 Redhawk Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd 92 Redhawk Pkwy & Peppercorn Dr • 93 Redhawk Pkwy & El Chimisal Rd -Tehachapi Pass 96 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall S 120 Ynez Rd & County Center Dr Three traffic signals with fiber infrastructure on Ynez Road are not communicating back to the TOC due to a gap on Ynez Road between Equity Drive and Winchester Road. The following three signals on Ynez Road contain 24-strand SMFOC with 12-strand SMFO break out cables. • Ynez Rd and Waverly Ln/Temecula Center Dr • Ynez Rd and Date St • Ynez Rd and Equity Dr There are 18 traffic signals with communication gaps due to missing fiber break out cables and equipment. These are locations where fiber was installed along the corridor for CCTV cameras, but fiber break-out cables were not installed to nearby traffic signal cabinets. There is existing twisted copper cable at 14 out of the 18 traffic signals with missing fiber break out cables. Copper communication infrastructure is obsolete and can no longer provide reliable communications back to the TOC. Signals with missing communication links are summarized in Table 3-2. Table 3-2: Missing Fiber Communication Breakout Locations ID 21 Intersection Diaz Rd & Rancho Way 22 Jefferson Ave & Sanborn Ave 23 Jefferson Ave & Overland Dr 24 Jefferson Ave & Via Montezuma 25 Jefferson Ave & Del Rio Rd 30 Margarita Rd & Verdes Ln 31 Margarita Rd & North General Kearny Rd 41 Margarita Rd & Pauba Rd 42 Margarita Rd & Santiago Rd 43 Margarita Rd & Pio Pico Rd 60 Pauba Rd & Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 63 Pechanga Pkwy & Rainbow Canyon Rd 64 Pechanga Pkwy & Muirfield Dr 70 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Resort Dr-Minimart 71 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr South 72 Pechanga Pkwy & Deer Hollow Way 94 Ring Rd & Promande Mall W 95 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall N Additionally, there are five traffic signals on Pechanga Parkway with 12-strand SMFO breakout cables pulled and coiled in the controller cabinet but lack communication equipment and fiber termination. Table 3-3 lists locations with missing communication equipment. Table ID 65 3-3: Missing Communication Equipment Locations Intersection Pechanga Pkwy & Loma Linda Rd 66 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr North 67 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd -Via Eduardo 68 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Casino Dr North 69 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Casino Dr South 3.2.2 Obsolete Equipment Obsolete equipment are unable to support modern device communication protocols and high bandwidth needs of current ITS applications. Traffic signals with existing copper wire and serial wireless radio infrastructure systems can no longer be accessed remotely from the TOC. At the time the systems were installed, they were considered state-of-the-art and performed reliably. However, by today's standards, the system technology is outdated, difficult to maintain, and can no longer service the current traffic management system information demands such as real-time video monitoring devices and data gathering applications. The City's copper wire and wireless radio networks are serial and have low bandwidth capability. There are currently 50 traffic signals with obsolete communication network equipment. There are 36 traffic signals with communication gaps and 50 traffic signals with obsolete equipment accounting for a total of 86 traffic signals with no communications back to the TOC. Offline traffic signals cannot be monitored remotely from the TOC and City staff must be dispatched to verify operations and timing in the field. This is an inefficient use of City time and resources. Locations with communication system gaps and obsolete equipment are illustrated in Figure 3-4 on the following page. 3.2.3 Dated Standards The City's communications conduit system was built over several decades and most of it was built to historical copper wire signal f �•.;.� interconnect cable (SIC) standards. These standards include shorter pull box spacing at intervals (approximately 200 feet), Caltrans _ standard number 3 and number 5 pull box sizes, 90-degree conduit-' sweeps at communication pull boxes, and segments with rigid metal conduit (RMC). Copper cable can be bent in tighter angles and coiled very tightly inside smaller pull boxes. Fiber optic cable is capable of transmitting data over much longer distances. Communication pull boxes may be spaced out at longer intervals (approximately 1,000 feet). Existing number 3 and number 5 pull boxes provide insufficient room for fiber slack and conduit sweeps need to be upgraded to 45-degrees to accommodate the wider bend radius of fiber optic cable. The City's current primary fiber ring is comprised of 24-strand and 48-strand SMFOC which limits future expansion and communication system reliability between traffic signals and City facilities. Additionally, there are currently no standards in place for fiber segregation and allocation. Figure 3-5 on the following page depicts the City's communications conduit systems built to either copper SIC standards or fiber standards. 3.2.4 Central Systems Central system communication deficiencies at the City's TOC were identified and are listed below. • Public Works and IT's fiber network are not currently separated. • Low quality CCTV camera video feeds are experienced at the TOC, which may be a result obsolete computer equipment with insufficient data processing. ;.2.5 Field Elements The City uses multiple ITS systems and Smart City applications to manage traffic operations, real-time monitoring, surveillance, and data collection throughout Temecula. Systems include connected devices at traffic signal cabinets, CCTV and surveillance cameras, streetlight monitoring systems, school zone flashers, radar speed feedback signs, data collection software, and smart parking applications. Each system has been reviewed and deficiencies identified and listed below. • The existing legacy 332 traffic signal cabinets and equipment are aging. The City is installing Advanced Traffic Control (352i ATC) technology cabinets at new traffic signals and at locations in need of replacement. 352i ATC cabinets support modern ITS applications including adaptive operations and performance measures. New 352i ATC cabinets may be installed on existing 332 cabinet foundations. • There are 54 type 170 controllers throughout the City, which are outdated, no longer supported by the manufacturer, and do not provide modern communication protocols or functionality required to perform advanced traffic operations. The City is anticipating replacing the remaining type 170 controllers with ATC FLeX controllers by the end of 2025. • 68% of conflict monitor units (CMUs) throughout the City are a combination of type 210 and 2010 ECL, which are not capable of providing intersection status and logs back to the TOC. Locations that are upgraded to new 352i ATC cabinets include integrated CMUs with auxiliary display units. • Tomar Electronics emergency vehicle preemption (EVPE) equipment is infrared -based, relies on line -of -sight, and is susceptible to illegal emitters. EVPE equipment models include 2000, 3000, and 4000 series. The 2000 and 3000 model series are only capable of serial communications. • 89% of the City's traffic signals have battery back-up (BBS) systems which include Alpha, Dimensions, and Marathon model brands. 50% of BBS systems are Dimensions and are outdated. They are typically installed within the traffic signal cabinet and do not provide communication protocols. • Cleanliness of CCTV cameras can create low quality video feeds back at the TOC. • There are traffic signals throughout the City that have existing CCTV cameras and four fixed cameras for police department surveillance. Multiple video feeds can place a large load on the existing communication system and affect overall bandwidth capacity. • Older school zone flashers do not have communications back to the TOC. Schedules for each school zone flashers must be physically uploaded and downloaded by City staff in the field. • Older radar speed feedback signs do not have communications back to the TOC. Data for each speed feedback sign must be physically uploaded and downloaded in the field. • Smart parking applications currently communicate through a third -party owned cellular network. 3.2.6 Leased Facilitip- There are currently seven City facilities and two police department facilities on third -party leased network lines. Existing network data rates for leased lines range between 100 MB to 1 GB. Third -party leased network lines were a feasible and fast solution to establish communications to City facilities at the time they were installed. The leased network communication lines are costly, reliant on the third -party owner for communication repairs, and have limited communications capabilities. This creates an unsustainable model for future expansion and data demands. Table 3-4 below summarizes the existing facilities on leased lines, network, and connection data rates. Table 3-4: Existing Facilities on Leased Network Lines ID Name Type Existing Network Connection Rate Temecula Community Recreation 11 City Facility E-Lines 500MB EPLAN Center 12 Temecula Help Center City Facility E-Lines 100MB EPLAN 16 Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park City Facility E-Lines 500MB EPLAN 17 Ronald Reagan Sports Park City Facility E-Lines 500MB EPLAN 18 Rotary Park City Facility E-Lines 100MB EPLAN 21 Temecula Skate Park City Facility E-Lines 500MB EPLAN 22 Police Department Mall Storefront Police Department E-Lines 100MB EPLAN 24 Pennypickle's Workshop City Facility VPN Sec — 1GB FiOs 27 Police Department Southwest Station Police Department E-Lines 100MB EPLAN The City's ITSS department plans to install fiber infrastructure and equipment at all City facilities, including the Mall Storefront Police Department substation which is currently on a leased network line. The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Office for police services. The Southwest Station is in Murrieta and serves as Temecula's main police department station. The leased network line at the Southwest Station is expected to remain. Figure 3-6 presents City facilities with current 1 GB fiber connections and third -party leased network lines. 3.3 City Initiatives This section summarizes City plans, programs, and initiatives that were evaluated to identify strategic objectives, goals, and needs relative to the transportation and communication systems. The needs established within City initiative documents will inform development of communication system improvements and recommendations identified in the master plan. 3.3.1 Quality of Life Master Plan Temecula's Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) 2040 was adopted by City Council in November 2015 and serves as a living document that reflects the vision and long-term goals of the City. The QLMP provides a proactive approach to identify specific community needs, goals, and improvements. Seven core values are identified in the QLMP that contribute to the City's overall quality of life: 1. Healthy and Livable City 2. Economic Prosperity 3. A Safe and Prepared City 4. A Sustainable City 5. Transportation, Mobility, and Connectivity 6. Accountable and Responsible Government 7. Equity Table 3-5 below summarizes goals and objectives identified in the QLMP that are connected to the communication system, the responsible department, and the system/subsystems that will help attain the goals and objectives. Table 3-5: QLMP Goals and Obiectives Goals/Objectives.. Evolving technology and increased internet access changing ITSS/ transportation systems and service delivery PW-Traffic Communication System Maintain a five minute or less response time for fire PW-Traffic Emergency Vehicle protection Preemption Systems Maintain and improve roadway network so that flow of PW-Traffic Traffic Signal and traffic is efficient Communication System Maintain the City's high level of air quality possible in PW-Traffic Traffic Signal and Temecula Communication System Build out the City's fiber optic network to provide public broadband access and manage City facilities and equipment ITSS Communication System Install Smart City technology to increase efficiency of service ITSS/ deliver PW-Traffic Communication System 3.3.2 Local Roadway Safety Plan =NoThe Temecula Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) was adopted by City Council on April 2022. The LRSP provides a framework to systematically identify and analyze Dogma roadway safety problems and recommend prioritized safety improvements LOCAL ROAD through collisions analysis and collaborative stakeholder input. The document SAFETY PLAN includes a prioritized list of issues, risk, actions, and improvements that can be 1--y 2022 D.t Report used to reduce fatalities and serious injuries on Temecula roadways. Four priority projects were identified through evaluation of Temecula's roadway needs, crash data analysis, and roadway network screening. 1. Citywide Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads Upgrades — Upgrade 54 signalized intersections with pedestrian countdown heads, APS push buttons, and new controllers. 2. Citywide Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrades — Upgrade 127 signalized intersections with new LED safety lighting and LED internally illuminated signs. 3. Citywide Dynamic Variable Speed Warning Systems — Install dynamic speed warning signs at 8 roadway segments throughout the City with relatively sharp curves. 4. Citywide Signal Timing and Communication Upgrades — Traffic operation and communication upgrades at 89 signalized intersections. Upgrades include, installation of network switches, fiber optic cable, and Ethernet wireless radio communications. The citywide pedestrian countdown signal heads upgrades project and a combination of the citywide traffic signal hardware and signal timing and communication system upgrades projects mentioned above were selected for award through the HSIP Cycle 11 grant program in 2023. 3.3.3 General Plan The City's General Plan is a blueprint providing long-term policy guidance for the community's physical, economic, social, and environmental changes. The General Plan was first created in 1993, updated in 2005, and is expected to be updated within the next two years. In the upcoming update, the City plans to adopt a new Circulation Element which will provide an opportunity to identify ways to better manage traffic through the City. General Plan goals and policies relative to the Circulation Element are summarized below. • Policy 1.2 — Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. • Policy 1.3 — Actively monitor the capacity of principal intersections throughout the City. • Policy 2.1 — Actively pursue the construction of system improvements outside the City's jurisdiction in cooperation with Caltrans, City of Murrieta, Riverside County, the Pechanga Band, and local developers. • Policy 2.3 — Actively pursue improvements to current freeway interchanges within the City. • Policy 3.1 — Require proper spacing and interconnect traffic signals where feasible to maximize the smooth progression of traffic flow and to minimize delay and stop -and -go conditions. Additionally, the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element includes Policy 9.3 to encourage installation of new technological infrastructure throughout the City including broadband, fiber optics, wireless, and other developing technologies. 3.3.4 Multi -use Trailc and Rikewav Mactar plan In 2016, the City completed a comprehensive update to the 2002 Multi -use Trails City of Temecula and Bikeways Master Plan (TBMP). The document evaluates previous and new proposed trails and on -street bicycle facilities using conventional field techniques, Multi -use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan geographic information systems (GIs) analysis, and public input to guide Temecula's future trail and bicycle facility implementation. r The TBMP identifies a need for continuous multi -modal measurement through Y technology to measure variables like pedestrian density and sidewalk level -of - service, as well as monitoring roadway usage, vehicle speeds, and bicycle counts. The goal is to support projects and studies through real-time counts on specific streets or urban locations. 4 Capital Improvements Information for future projects that may be leveraged to improve the communication system throughout Temecula was researched in documentation provided by the City's Public Works Traffic Engineering Division, ITSS Department, and through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Temecula CIP serves as a 5-year planning tool that aligns revenue and funding source projections with capital projects for City departments based on projected development activity, fees, and grant opportunities. The current fiscal years 2023-2027 (FY23-27) CIP includes circulation projects, infrastructure projects, parks, and recreation projects. These improvements provide the opportunity to bridge communication system gaps and enable expansion of City services including public Wi-Fi and other Smart City applications. 4.1 Future Project Improvements Summary Research of City documentation and CIP provided information on new communication systems, new roadways, planned roadway widenings, new traffic signals, and new City facilities. Future projects provide an opportunity to install communication infrastructure and connect existing traffic signals that are off line or have no communication to them. Related future improvements identified are summarized in the following subsections below and are organized into tables that include project's name, description, City department executing the project, and source from where project information was obtained. 4.1.1 Communications System The City plans to construct several new communication system paths in the near future. Improvements are summarized in Table 4-1 below. A few of the future communications system projects identified are strategically paired with new roadway improvements. Table 4-1: Future Communication Systems Project Name/Description DepartmentID Ynez Rd Fiber: New fiber on Ynez Rd from Equity Dr to 1 Winchester Rd. New fiber breakouts at Ynez Rd/County Public City Works -Traffic Documentation Center Dr Diaz Rd Expansion: Widen Diaz Rd into 4-lane divided major arterial between Cherry St and Rancho California Rd. New Public City 2 Documentation/ fiber and conduit to be installed on Diaz Rd between Works -Traffic Winchester Rd to Rancho California Rd FY23-27 CIP Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Dr/Overland Dr 3 Widening: New conduit and fiber on Overland Dr from Diaz Rd Public City to Jefferson Ave Works -Traffic Documentation Traffic Signal Enhancement Program: Upgrade existing traffic signal equipment at various signalized intersections citywide including replacement of traffic signal controllers, battery Public 4 back-up systems, light emitting diode (LED) traffic signal Works -Traffic FY23-27 CIP indications, traffic signal controller cabinets, service cabinets, safety street lighting, signal communication equipment, fiber optic cable, conduit, service conductors, and detector cable 5 Name/DescriptionID Project HSIP Cycle 11 Citywide Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads: Install pedestrian countdown signal heads and upgrade traffic signal controllers for operation at 54 intersections throughout the City. .. Public Works -Traffic HSIP Cycle 11 Approved Project List HSIP Cycle 11 Citywide Traffic Signal Hardware, Signal Timing, and Communications Upgrades: Upgrade traffic signal hardware including LED safety lighting, vehicle signal heads, retro-reflective backplates, signal wiring, and traffic signal cabinets at 127 intersections throughout the City. Install Public HSIP Cycle 11 6 fiber communications and equipment at five signalized Works -Traffic Approved Project intersections on Butterfield Stage Rd and 15 signalized List intersections on Ynez Rd. Install wireless communications and equipment at 11 signalized intersections located remote areas within the City. Update signal timing at intersections with fiber and wireless communication upgrades. Citywide Surveillance Cameras: Install citywide camera FY23-27 CIP/IT surveillance systems to support public safety, traffic Citywide 7 management, and asset protection for Sam Hicks Park, History ITSS Network Museum, Senior Center, 6th Street Restroom, Old Town Master Plan Map Theatre, Children's Museum 4.1.2 Roadway Projects Future roadway projects researched from the City's CIP include roadway widening, construction of medians, curb, gutter, sidewalk, and storm drain improvements. Projects researched are summarized in Table 4-2 below. Table 4-2: Future Roadway Projects ID Project Name/Descr Owartment Source Nicolas Rd Extension: Extend Nicolas Rd from the Roripaugh Ranch Phase II westerly boundary to Calle Girasol/Liefer Rd. Public City 1 Documentation/ New communication conduit on Nicolas Rd from Joseph Rd to Works -Traffic Butterfield Stage Rd FY23-27 CIP Ynez Road Improvements - Phase I: Widen Ynez Rd from 2 Rancho Vista Rd to Tierra Vista Rd to 2-lanes and complete Public Works City Documentation/ missing segments of curb and gutter, sidewalk, and FY23-27 CIP landscaped medians Butterfield Stage Rd Storm Drain Improvements: Widen east side of Butterfield Stage Road north of Temecula Pkwy; storm 3 drain will be on east side of Butterfield Stage Rd from south Public Works FY23-27 CIP of De Portola Rd to south of Wolf Store Rd Cherry St Extension and Murrieta Creek Low Flow Crossing: 4 Extend Cherry St from Adams Ave to Diaz Rd public Works FY23-27 CIP French Valley Interchange Phase II: Construct 2-lane 5 northbound collector/ distributor road system from north of public Works FY23-27 CIP Project Name/Description DepartmentID the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps to north of the I- 15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215 French Valley Interchange Phase III: Construct French Valley 6 Pkwy interchange and southbound collector/ distributor road Public Works FY23-27 CIP system 1-15 Congestion Relief: Construct single auxiliary lane on 7 northbound 1-15 connecting the Temecula Pkwy on -ramp to Public Works FY23-27 CIP the Rancho California Rd on -ramp 8 Motor Cark Pkwy Improvements: Improve roadway on Public Works FY23-27 CIP Motor Car Pkwy, Ynez Rd, Margarita Rd, and Solana Wy Rancho California Rd Median: Construct missing raised medians on Rancho California Rd between Humber Dr and Butterfield Stage Rd; construct missing street improvements 9 such as median curbs, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and Public Works FY23-27 CIP landscape and irrigation on the north side of Rancho California Rd between Riesling Ct and Promenade Chardonnay Hills Ynez Rd Improvements - Phase II: Widen Ynez Rd from Rancho Vista Rd to La Paz St to 2-lanes in each direction and complete missing segments of curb and gutter, sidewalk, 10 Public Works FY23-27 CIP landscaped medians, streetlights; traffic signal modification at Santiago Rd; Phase 2A between Rancho Vista Rd and Santiago Rd; Phase 2B between Santiago Rd and La Paz St 11 La Paz St Widening: Ynez Rd to Temecula Pkwy Public Works FY23-27 CIP Pauba Rd Improvements: East of Margarita Rd to the north 12 Public Works FY23-27 CIP side 13 Rainbow Canyon Rd Widening: Pechanga Pkwy to City Limit Public Works FY23-27 CIP 14 Rancho Wy Extension: Diaz Rd to Margarita Rd Public Works FY23-27 CIP 15 Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Overcrossing into Old Town Public Works FY23-27 CIP 4.1.3 Traffic Signals There are future traffic signals planned throughout the City. The City is currently determining final locations. Traffic signals will need to be connected to the City's future communication system built out. Future traffic signals will be entered into the City's Transparity database and will be assigned a logical system ID following construction. Turn on dates and full traffic signal equipment inventory will be tabulated into the City's existing signal inventory database. 4.1.4 City Facilities Five new City facilities were identified in the City's CIP and are listed in Table 4-3. Table 4-3: Future Citv Facilities JL 1 Project Name/Description NEW- Old Town Gymnasium DepartmentID Public Works FY23-27 CIP 2 Southside Branch Library Public Works FY23-27 CIP 3 Southside Recreation Center Public Works FY23-27 CIP 4 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Public Works FY23-27 CIP 5 Vail Ranch Park Site D Public Works FY23-27 CIP Public Works and IT departments will determine during the design phase whether each new facility will be interconnected to the existing communication system. Figure 4-1 on the next page illustrates the planned future communication infrastructure that was summarized in this chapter. A dynamic layer was created to highlight missing communication conduit segments required to complete a primary fiber backbone ring within the City. The recommended primary fiber backbone ring is discussed in further detail in the Communication Network Recommendations chapter. 5 Technology Trends This chapter discusses current industry technology trends that are transforming cities into interconnected, sustainable, and community -centric environments. As technology continues to advance, Cities will continue to evolve and adapt to meet the needs of their residents while striving for a more sustainable and livable future. The purpose of this report is to identify current off -the -shelf technology trends and related applications to ensure that the City's future communication system can support the various applications. Technology trends are summarized in the following sections. 5.1 Smart Mobility Smart mobility leverages technology to enable various forms of transportation to function in a more efficient, resilient, and sustainable ways. This includes the use of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) to alleviate congestion, improve public transportation, and enhance mobility. The various applications available merge and interrelate. Smart mobility applications and strategies are summarized in the subsections below. 5.1.1 Advanced Traffic Management Systems Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS) are central system platforms that integrate connected devices including controllers, detection, and communications into one application. ATMS provides an interface and access for operations and management of the traffic signal system. Standard ATMS applications provide various modes of traffic signal operations and enable collection of high -resolution (Hi -Res) data, which improves roadway safety and increases effective capacity of local roads. Additional ATMS modules may include the following: 1. Adaptive Signal Timing: applications that provide traffic operations that dynamically adjust timing to accommodate variable traffic demands. It requires a combination of robust vehicle detection, traffic signal communication systems, and advanced control software. The vehicle detection configuration requirements vary by vendor, but most advanced adaptive systems require a level of detection beyond typical standards for actuated operation. 2. Signal Performance Measures (SPMs): applications that automatically convert Hi -Res controller data into actionable performance measures utilizing a collection of data analytics tools. Integration into a ATMS software provides the ability to utilize traffic signal controller logs and real-time traffic data from the vehicle detection system to provide analytical reports including controller events list, phase split monitoring, phase arrivals, phase idle times, Purdue Coordination Diagrams (PCD), preemption logs, turning movement counts, and peak hour logs. 3. Asset Management Tools: applications that are specially designed to meet the needs of traffic engineering, operations, and maintenance staff. Applications are capable of consolidating system- wide information into a central database by tracking various traffic signal infrastructure assets and conditions, inventory, and maintenance records by location. 4. Platform Integration Modules: applications that can integrate ITS equipment and applications including detectors, connected equipment at signal controller cabinets, variable message signs, CCTV cameras, counting stations, parking garages, air quality sensors, and connected vehicle technology. The City of Temecula uses Transparity Intersection Management System (IMS) to manage intersection status and timing data. This is a good start and an ideal companion to a larger traffic management system. 5.1.2 Integrated Corridor Management Multijurisdictional transportation corridors are often independently operated which can result in underutilized capacity throughout the entire transportation network. According to the USDOT, Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) can efficiently and proactively manage the movement of people and goods in major transportation corridors through collaboration, leveraging ITS technologies, innovative multimodal and multijurisdictional strategies that optimize existing infrastructure to help manage and reduce congestion. ICM strategies can provide travelers with relevant information on transportation alternatives, which encourages redistribution of trips to less congested routes, modes, or times of day. This can be achieved by implementing a smart multijurisdictional transportation system that combines road sensors, transit management strategies, video, and traveler information to reduce congestion. The system can deliver information to commuters through a variety of mediums such as Internet websites, mobile applications, and changeable message signs. This enables traffic management managers to adjust traffic signal and ramp meters to direct travelers to high -occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, high -occupancy tolling (HOT) lanes, bus rapid transit systems, and other options. Temecula is a regional roadway transportation hub at the confluence of I-15, I-215, and SR-79 in southern Riverside County. Traffic congestion during peak hour periods on the state highway system (SHS) greatly impacts Temecula's major east -west arterials. There is a lack of effective traffic management systems between various governing jurisdictions including San Diego County, Riverside County, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), City of Temecula, and City of Murrieta. This results in reduced system efficiency, limited proactive management and operation, and significant loss of transportation access. 5.1.3 Connected Vehicle Technology According to the USDOT, connected vehicle (CV) technologies consist of equipment, applications, or systems that use vehicle -to -everything (V2X) communications to address safety, system efficiency, and mobility on roadways. The CV concept uses data from short-range communication broadcasts and peer - to -peer exchanges to sense other travelers including vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians, wheelchairs, motorcycles, buses, and trucks. CV strategies include Transit Signal Priority (TSP) and Freight Signal Priority (FSP). Both strategies modify traffic signal timing and/or phasing to provide priority to applicable vehicles at traffic signals along a corridor to improve reliability, travel time, and reduce delay and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has recently introduced a new standard to V2X communications referred as cellular -to -everything (C2X). C2X technology allows vehicles to exchange information with other vehicles, infrastructure components, and other roadway users through cellular vehicle -to -everything (C-V2X) technology. C2X technology can enhance road safety and improve traffic efficiency by exchanging real-time information including traffic conditions, road hazards, or upcoming traffic signals. Vehicles can make informed decisions to optimize their routes and prevent collisions. Standards and regulations governing C2X communication are being established to ensure interoperability and compatibility among different manufacturers and infrastructure providers. 5.1.4 Smart Parping SvstPry Smart parking applications utilize sensors, data analytics, mobile applications, and communication system to provide real-time information about parking availability and optimize parking operations. Smart parking solutions can be implemented in various environments including street parking, parking lots, garages, and shopping malls. Key features and benefits of smart parking include: • Real-time parking availability • Parking guidance and navigation • Reservation and pre -booking • Payment and ticketless systems • Analytics and data insights • Enforcement and security The City has made great progress in implementing smart parking facilities at Old Town Parking Garage, 2d Street Parking Lot, and 6th Street Parking Lot. 5.2 Smart Infrastructure Smart infrastructure refers to the integration of advanced technologies, connectivity, and data -driven solutions into various components of urban infrastructure systems. The following subsections discuss a few trends related to smart infrastructure. 5.2.1 Chanizeable Message Signs Changeable Message Signs (CMS) are defined by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) as a traffic control device that can display one or more alternative messages. CMS systems provide real-time traffic information to motorists including expected delays, travel time estimates, diversion routes, and lane closures during incidents, special events, and work zone traffic control. CMS systems may be integrated with the communication system to provide real-time information. 5.2.2 Automatic License Plate Recognition Automatic License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems that utilize optical character recognition (OCR) and image processing techniques to automatically read and recognize license plate numbers on vehicles, compare the plate number acquired to one more database of vehicles of interest to law enforcement known as "hot lists", and alert law enforcement officers when a vehicle of interest has been observed. ALPR systems typically consist of cameras, software algorithms, and databases to capture, analyze, and store license plate data. - 2.3 Smart Street LiLyhts Street lighting contributes to the safety and security of road traffic by providing an enhanced visual environment allowing accurate and comfortable visibility during hours of darkness. Intelligent lighting controls and energy management systems can enable light fixtures to operate autonomously using various prediction algorithms based on astrological calendar, photocontrols or motion detectors. Implementing intelligent street lighting with a central management system via wireless and wired networks rounds out a portfolio of capabilities that save energy and improve quality of lighting. Smart street light poles include various sensors and devices including: • Wi-Fi access points • Video and AV media systems • Smart grid lighting • Dynamic banner signs • Environmental sensors • Emergency call stations • Charging pile for electric vehicles The City currently has a GE LightGrid central management system that provides communication access to most street lights throughout the City. 5.3 Community Engagement Community engagement plays a vital role in the development and success of a Smart City. City officials can better understand the needs, challenges of residents, businesses, and other stakeholders. Community engagement may be established by (1) establishing proper communication and information sharing and (2) providing digital platforms and applications. It is important to establish open and transparent channels of communication to inform the community about Smart City projects, initiatives, and their potential benefits. This may be achieved through various communication channels including websites, social media platforms, newsletters, and community meetings to share updates, seek feedback, and address concerns. Digital platforms and mobile applications can enable residents to access information, services, and participate in Smart City initiatives. These platforms can facilitate two-way communication, reporting issues, accessing public services, and engaging in civic activities. The City's QLMP lists a strategic objective to develop a web -based dashboard to help communicate with Temecula residents and track progress over time. The active involvement of residents and stakeholders can lead to a more sustainable and citizen -centric Smart City development. 5.4 Cybersecurity As digital infrastructure and interconnected systems become more prevalent, it's essential to implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect against potential threats and vulnerabilities. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) outlines best practices and recommendations that Smart Cities may take to prevent any potential threats. Best practices and recommendations include secure planning and design, proactive supply chain risk management, and operational resilience. Relevant recommendations are summarized below: • Enforce Multifactor Authentication: Secure remote access applications and enforce multifactor authentication (MFA) on local and remote accounts and devices where possible to harden the infrastructure that enables access to networks and systems. • Implement Zero Trust Architecture: Creates a more secure network environment that requires authentication and authorization for each new connection with a layered, defense -in-depth approach to security. • Securely Manage Smart City Assets: Secure Smart City assets against theft and unauthorized physical changes. Consider implementing physical and logical security controls to protect sensors and monitors against manipulation, theft, vandalism, and environmental threats. • Managed Service Providers and Cloud Service Providers: Consider setting clear security requirements for managed service providers and other vendors supporting Smart City technology implementation and operations. Ensure organization security standards are included in contractual agreements. • Backup Systems and Data: Consider creating, maintaining, and testing backups for IT system records and for manual operational capabilities for the physical systems integrated in a Smart City network. The Temecula ITSS department is responsible for researching, developing, implementing, and supporting effective and innovative uses of cybersecurity technologies. Cybersecurity is an ongoing process that requires continuous evaluation, improvement, and collaboration to address emerging threats and maintain a secure Smart City environment. Prioritizing cybersecurity can protect critical infrastructure, sensitive data, and privacy of residents while enabling the benefits of digital transformation. 6 Recommendations This chapter of the Citywide Communications System Master Plan (CCSMP) presents key recommendations for establishing and maintaining an efficient communications network capable of servicing the City's current and future needs. The City's communication system network connects various facilities, buildings, and network devices including traffic signal equipment and surveillance cameras. Its primary purpose is to facilitate real-time data exchange between network devices and the City's central hub (City Hall). The following key qualities were considered for the development of recommendations outlined in this chapter: • Security: The communication system network shall be built with security as the essential component. • Reliability: The communication system network shall ensure continuous communications to City's network devices. • Scalability: The communication system network shall accommodate future growth and technological advancements. • Redundancy: The communication system network shall be built in to ensure system resilience in case of failures. • Compatibility: The communication system network shall support various communication protocols and be compatible with existing and future equipment. The recommendations outlined in this chapter provide a framework for designing and implementing a communications network that provides these qualities and meets the needs identified in the previous Needs Assessment chapter. 6.1 Communication System Topology Temecula's future citywide communication system will link all system elements creating one ubiquitous network on which all devices will communicate. The Public Works Traffic Engineering and ITSS Departments are responsible for the City's communication system and have identified the need to expand the existing system to connect to all City owned facilities. The citywide communication system will be composed of the following network layers: • Core — Central layer that provides high-speed connection between various distribution layer devices and serves at the backbone of the network. • Distribution — Layer that connects the access layer to the core layer. • Access — Layer that provides connection to network devices. The access layer acts as a subring of network devices. Figure 6-1 provides a high-level schematic illustration of a communication network system composed of a core, distribution, and access layer. Figure 6-1: Communication System Network Architecture Example z W } 3 N LU W U CJ ACCESS LAYER ACCESS LAYER This section identifies the topology that will provide a reliable, redundant, and future -proof communication network that meets the City's Transportation and IT System needs. The following subsections discuss recommendations related to the City's backbone fiber ring, communication hubs, and system network groups. 6.1.1 Core Layer The City's core network layer will consist of a backbone fiber ring made up of primary and secondary rings located on major roadways. A fiber optic ring design increases flexibility and resilience by minimizing risks from an equipment failure or fiber cut. The City's major roadway network includes principal, major, and secondary arterials: • Principal arterials act as the main thoroughfares by providing access to major activity centers and to the regional freeway system. These include Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway, Winchester Road, and Pechanga Parkway. • Major arterials complement the principal system by providing a medium capacity backbone system. These include Butterfield Stage Rd, Jefferson Ave, Margarita Rd, Nicolas Rd, and Ynez Rd. • Secondary arterials carry traffic between local streets and principal or major arterials. These include Date Street, Deer Hollow Way, Meadows Pkwy, Redhawk Pkwy, and Vail Ranch Pkwy. The primary fiber optic ring routes along the City's outermost perimeter and principal/major arterials. This provides the City with the widest reach possible which maximizes service area with connections to most of the City's traffic signals, facilities, and key areas. The existing communication system was built ad -hoc without a specific topology approach. There are planned capital improvement projects that will install fiber optic communication infrastructure along Butterfield Stage Road, Diaz Road, and Nicolas Road. These improvements will bridge gaps and make progress toward the primary fiber optic ring. It is recommended to install new fiber optic interconnect and conduit at the remaining gaps to establish a ring at the outermost perimeter of the City. Table 6-1 lists the remaining roadway gaps. Table 6-1: Primary Rings Gaps Roadway Start End Old Town Front St Santiago Rd/First St Temecula Parkway Temecula Pkwy Old Town Front St Bedford Ct Deer Hollow Way Pechanga Pkwy Peppercorn Dr Peppercorn Dr Deer Hollow Way Redhawk Pkwy Redhawk Pkwy/ Vail Ranch Rd Peppercorn Dr Nighthawk Pass Nighthawk Pass Vail Ranch Rd Butterfield Stage Rd Butterfield Stage Rd Nighthawk Pass Wolf Store Rd Nicolas Rd Via Lobo Rd North General Kearny Rd Secondary fiber optic rings are routed through the City's major and secondary arterials and will provide connections to traffic signals and facilities along Redhawk Parkway, Vail Ranch Parkway, Meadows Parkway, Date Street, Ynez Road (north of Winchester Road), and Margarita Road (north of Winchester Road). Linear branches from the primary and/or secondary rings will connect remaining traffic signals and facilities located in remote areas of the City. The following recommendations are provided for fiber optic deployments in existing and new conduit installations: • Leverage the existing fiber optic backbone to establish communication to remaining traffic signals and facilities with no communication infrastructure. • Primary rings should be a minimum 288-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. • Secondary rings should be a minimum 144-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. • Linear branch connections should be a minimum 72-strand single -mode fiber optic cable. 6.1.2 Distribution Layer The distribution layer will consist of communication hubs strategically located throughout the City's core network. Communication hubs will provide access between the fiber backbone ring and network equipment at traffic signal cabinets and ITSS facilities. There are nine existing communication hubs located throughout the communication network on principal and major arterials. Five new communication hubs are recommended to establish redundancy with rings between hubs. New hubs will house layer 3 switches and fiber distribution units with splice trays and patch panels. Existing hubs will be upgraded to accommodate the recommended upsized fiber backbone ring. Table 6-2 below lists the existing and recommended communication hub locations. Table 6-2: Communication Network Hub Locations 1 Rancho California Rd & Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front St Existing 2 Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave Existing 3 Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd Existing 4 Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Existing 5 Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd Existing 6 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nicolas Rd Recommended 7 Ynez Rd & Overland Dr Existing 8 Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd Existing 9 Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd Existing 10 Butterfield Stage Rd & Rancho California Rd Recommended 11 Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St Recommended 12 Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy Existing 13 Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy Recommended 14 Butterfield Stage Rd & Temecula Pkwy Recommended The following lists recommendations for existing and new communication hubs: • Provide a Layer 3 switch at each hub for the traffic signal network. • Provide a Layer 3 switch at each hub for the ITSS network. • Each hub shall be connected to a minimum of two other hubs. • Each hub shall provide communications backhaul to City Hall. Figure 6-2 on the following page depicts the built -out backbone fiber rings, hub upgrades, and recommended hubs. 6.1.3 Access Layer The access layer consists of connected Internet Protocol (IP) devices at traffic signal controller cabinets and ITSS facilities. City traffic signals and ITSS facilities are recommended to be organized into separate network groups with each group connected to a minimum of two communication hubs. The use of communication hubs and network groups provides two levels of redundancy: (1) Devices can communicate with separate hubs if a communication link within the network group fails and (2) If a communication hub fails, each network group can communicate with the second or third hub. The traffic signal system network is organized into 13 groups ranging between 5 and 16 signals per group. Each traffic signal network group is connected to a minimum of two hubs and some groups are connected to three hubs. Each hub will backhaul traffic signal data to the City's Traffic Operation Center (TOC). Table 6-3 summarizes the traffic signal system network groups by total number of signals in each group, corridors, segment limits, and recommended hub connectivity and Figure 6-3 illustrates the traffic signal network groups topology. Table 6-3: Traffic Signal System Network Groups Total CorridorGroup No. Signals Winchester Rd to Rancho California mmv� Diaz Rd Rd 1. Rancho California Rd Sanborn Ave to Rancho California & Jefferson/ Old Town 1 11 Jefferson Ave Rd/Old Town Front St Front St Winchester Rd Diaz Rd to Jefferson Ave 2. Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave Rancho Business Park Dr/Ridge Park Dr to California Rd Jefferson Ave/ Old Town Front St Waverly Ln/Temecula Center to 3. Ynez Rd & Winchester Ynez Rd Winchester Rd Rd 2 10 4. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Date St to Winchester Rd Date St Ynez Rd to Margarita Rd Margarita Rd Winchester Rd to Promenade 3. Ynez Rd & Winchester Ynez Rd Mall/Palm Plaza South Rd Winchester Rd Ynez Rd to Margarita Rd 4. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 3 14 5. Winchester Rd & Ring Rd Promenade Mall South to Promenade Nicolas Rd Mall East 7. Ynez Rd & Overland Dr 7. Ynez Rd & Overland 4 6 Ynez Rd Overland Dr to Town Plaza South Dr 8. Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd Margarita Rd Verdes Ln to Yukon Rd/Honors Dr 4. Winchester Rd & N General Margarita Rd to Camino Campos 5 12 Margarita Rd Kearny Rd Verdes Total CorridorGroup Overland Dr Promenade Way/Nicole Ln to 9. Rancho California Rd Margarita Rd & Margarita Rd Butterfield Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to La Serena 6. Butterfield Stage Rd & 6 5 Stage Rd Way Nicolas Rd Meadows Pkwy to Butterfield Stage 10. Rancho California Rd La Serena Way Rd & Butterfield Stage Rd Rancho Ynez Rd to Butterfield Stage Rd 8. Rancho California Rd California Rd & Ynez Rd 7 13 9. Rancho California Rd Meadows Pkwy Rancho California Rd to Rancho Vista & Margarita Rd Rd 10. Butterfield Stage Rd & Rancho California Rd Ynez Rd Tierra Vista Rd to Temecula Pkwy 8. Rancho California Rd Rancho Vista Rd Ynez Rd to Mira Loma Dr & Ynez Rd 8 8 Temecula Pkwy Ynez Rd to Wabash Ln 11. Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St Old Town Front Signal at Old Town Front St & 12. Pechanga Pkwy & St Santiago Rd/First St Temecula Pkwy Margarita Rd Rancho Vista Rd to Dartolo Rd 9. Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd 9 8 Pauba Rd Calle Ventura/Fire State 84 to Via 13. Temecula Pkwy & Rami/Linfield Way Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy 12. Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy 10 6 Temecula Pkwy Pechanga Pkwy to Margarita Rd 13. Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy Meadows Pkwy Pauba Rd to Temecula Pkwy Butterfield Stage Rd Ave Lestonnac to Temecula Pkwy 10. Butterfield Stage Rd 11 16 &Rancho California Rd De Portola Rd Meadows Pkwy to Campanula Way E 14. Butterfield Stage Rd Campanula Way Camino Del Sol to Meadows Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy Temecula Pkwy Camino Del Sol to Butterfield Stage Rd Pechanga Pkwy Rainbow Canyon Rd to Deer Hollow 12. Pechanga Pkwy & Way Temecula Pkwy Wolf Valley Rd Pechanga Pkwy to Wolf Creek Dr N/S 12 13 13. Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Deer Hollow Pechanga Pkwy to Peppercorn Dr Way Pkwy Redhawk Pkwy Via Rio Temecula/Wolf Store Rd to El 13. Temecula Pkwy & 13 10 Chimisal Rd/Tehachapi Pass Margarita Rd/Redhawk Nighthawk Pass Ranch Pkwy to Butterfield Stage Pkwy Rail The Heart of Sou�amia Group Total Corridor Segment (signals along segment) Hub Connectivity No. Sienals i _ Citywide Communications System Master Plan 61 The City's ITSS facility system network is organized into eight groups based on geographic location. Most of the connected ITSS facilities are in the Old Town District and at the center of the City near Margarita Road/Ranch Vista Road and Margarita Road/Pauba Road. The ITSS facility system network groups are also recommended to connect to a minimum of two communication hubs. Table 6-4 summarizes the facility system network groups by total number of facilities in each group, facility ID, facility name, and recommended hub connectivity. Table 6-4: Group. ITSS Facilities System Network Groups No. Facilities ID J" jr� 1 4 Old Town Parking Structure 9 Police Department Old Town Station 14 Mary Phillips Senior Center 1. Rancho California Rd & 15 Old Town 6th Street Restroom 1 8 Jefferson/ Old Town Front St 11. Old Town Front St & 19 Sam Hicks Monument Park Santiago Rd/First St 20 Temecula Valley Museum 23 Old Town Community Theater 24 Pennypickle's Workshop 3 Field Operations Center 1. Rancho California Rd & 2 2 Jefferson/ Old Town Front St 2• Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave 8 Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2) 3. Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd 3 1 22 Police Department Mall Storefront 4. Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 7. Ynez Rd & Overland Dr 4. Winchester Rd & 4 1 13 Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park & Margarita Rec Center (MRC) Margarita Rd 9. Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd 6. Butterfield Stage Rd & 5 1 26 Sports Ranch At Sommers Bend Nicolas Rd 10. Rancho California Rd & Butterfield Stage Rd 5 Temecula Duck Pond 8. Rancho California Rd & 7 Temecula Park & Ride Ynez Rd 6 5 11. Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St 12. Pechanga Pkwy & 12 Temecula Help Center 18 Rotary Park 25 Safe Family Justice Centers Temecula Pkwy 6 Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library 9. Rancho California Rd & 10 Fire Station 84 Margarita Rd 11 Temecula Community Recreation Center 7 5 13. Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk 17 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Pkwy 21 Temecula Skate Park The City's Civic Center Building (Facility ID 1), Traffic Operations Center (Facility ID 2), and PD Southwest Station (Facility ID 27) were not included in the facility system network groups listed above. Figure 6-4 depicts the ITSS facility system network groups topology. 6.1.4 Network Architecture The City of Temecula resembles a geographic grid based on the layout of east/west and north/south arterials. These arterials are the physical routes for the fiber optic communication system topology. The recommended network architecture presented in this subsection is designed to provide as much failover connectivity as possible. City Hall is located west of Interstate 15 (1-15) and acts as the central hub for the communication system network. The central hub (City Hall) has multiple connections to hubs located on the west and east side of the 1-15. Winchester Road, Rancho California Road, and Temecula Parkway serve as the three main routes across the 1-15 and provide failover connectivity in the event a communication fault occurs along either one of the three routes. Each communication hub is connected to a minimum of two hubs. There are instances on the eastern side of the City where hubs are connected to three or even four other hubs. Device subrings are created between hubs and resemble the traffic signal and facility system network groups presented in the previous subsection. Like communication hubs, device subrings are connected to a minimum of two hubs. Some device subrings are connected to three or four hubs depending on where they're located within the network. The network architecture layout matches the topology of the City, provides a high-level of redundancy, and provides connectivity to all network devices that ultimately require a network connection. Figure 6-5 and Figure 6-6 on the following pages illustrate the recommended traffic signal and ITSS facilities system network architectures, respectively. The traffic signal and ITSS facilities network systems will utilize the same fiber backbone and communication hub network layout. Device subrings between hubs are shown relative to the geographic location of traffic signals and ITSS facilities. Ethernet switch symbols represent the first and last breakouts within each device subring. The conforming continuation symbol represents the total breakouts between the first and last breakout. Although the traffic signal and ITSS facilities network systems will be backhauled to City Hall's Data Center/ Server Room, both network systems are recommended to be separate. Each department will have their own dedicated fiber count and layer 3 switch within the Data Center/ Server Room. Figure 6-5 : Traffic Signal Network Architecture •......GROUP3 • = GROUP3 2 3 4 5 6 WINCHESTER RD WINCHESTER RD WINCHESTER RD NICOLASRD o � o • w GROUP3 � Q % F- GROUP : 0 Q • GROUPS W GROUP6 • LL a • a=0 GROUP4 GROUP7 / w • GROUP7 1 z 8 .....-= 9 �® 30 IIRANCHO CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 0 GROUPS O K 1~n LL w GROUPS GROUP9 i GROUP 11 O } I I w O 00 11 12 13 14 OLD TOWN FRONT ST TEMECULA PKWY TEMECU LA PKWY —.• GROUP IO GROUPS GROUP12 GROUP13 City Data Center/Server Room " Layer 2 Switch Distribution Layer (Layer 3 Link) # HUB Number Access Layer (Layer 2 Link) Communication Hub Core Layer (Fiber Backbone) ...... Conforming Continuation 67 Figure 6-6 : ITSS Facilities Network Architecture Fxample GRO GRO 2 3 4 5 6 GROUP6 GROUP8 IICity Data Center/Server Room ® Layer 3 Switch Distribution Layer ®q HUB Number Access Layer Communication Hub Core Layer (Fiber Backbone) ...... Conforming Continuation GROUPS 68 The City's ITSS Department will implement a combination of the recommended redundant ring network presented earlier in this section and a home -run fiber network. Home -run fiber connections to all existing and future facilities within the City will be prioritized first. This network configuration only consists of the core and access layer. Home -run fiber connections include individual fiber optic pairs between the City's Data Center/ Server Room to a Layer 3 switch at a City facility. In this configuration, there are no intermediate connections, splices, or branching off to other devices along the path of the cable. This configuration offers advantages including reduced signal loss, minimized interference, and easier troubleshooting but also utilizes more fiber optic cable strands compared to the redundant ring network layout. Figure 6-7 below presents a high-level typical schematic diagram illustrating a home -run fiber connection between the City's Data Center/ Server room and a facility. Connected equipment at facilities include surveillance cameras, Wi-Fi, and work stations for ITSS staff. Figure 6-7. ITSS Fiber Home -Run Network Architecture Example CITY FACILITY 17 — — — — — — — — — — I SURVEILLANCE I � CAMERAS I SERVER ROOM/DATA I CENTER I I I WI-FI I FIBER PAIR CABLEL111ij I I 7LAYER I I I rQ1 WORKSTATIONS I L- — — — — — — — — — — j Table 6-5 lists existing and future facilities that will receive home -run fiber connections. Table 6-5:11 SS Facilities with Home -Run Fiber Connections acillity Civic Center Traffic Control Center Facility Status -MM Existing Field Operations Center Existing Fire Station 84 (Near the Library) Existing Altair Recreation Center Future Jefferson Soccer Field Future Harveston Boat House Existing Harveston Lake Park Existing Jefferson Recreation Center Existing Margarita Recreation Center Existing Mary Phillips Senior Center Existing Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park Existing Old Town 6th Street Restroom Existing Old Town Community Theater Existing Old Town Parking Structure Existing Temecula Park & Ride Existing Patricia Birdsall Sports Park Existing Pennypickle's Workshop Existing Police Department Mall Storefront Existing Police Department Old Town Station Existing Police Department Southwest Station Existing Ronald Reagan Sports Park Existing Ronald Roberts Temecula Public Library Existing Rotary Park Existing SAFE Family Justice Center Existing Sam Hicks Monument Park Existing Sommers Bend Existing Community Recreation Center Existing Temecula Duck Pond Existing Temecula Help Center Existing Temecula Skate Park Existing Temecula Valley Museum Existing Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2) Existing 6.2 Network Analysis Network analysis of the fully built out communication system was performed to compare future data demands with the theoretical bandwidth capacity. The purpose of the network analysis is to assess the overall data requirements necessary for the various network devices to communicate to City Hall utilizing the recommended communication system topology routing and network groups. It is crucial to ensure that the recommended communication system can service the City's current and future needs. The analysis conducted in this section will assist in identifying proper network configurations needed for network devices to efficiently communicate data within the system topology without constraint and ensure enough headroom remains to service future data demands. The following sections analyze data demands and summarize bandwidth calculation results for both the traffic signal and ITSS facilities network systems. u./-.1 Traffic Signal System Bandwidth Calculations The traffic signal system is comprised of various devices that place data demands on the City's communication system network. Research was performed to identify data demands for equipment utilized in this analysis. Table 6-6 lists equipment, provides a short description of equipment functionality, and lists data demands for each equipment in megabits per second (Mbps). Table 6-6: Traffic Signal System Devices and Data Demands Equipment Controller Software — Adaptive Operations Data D- .. 0.1 Controller Software —Signal Performance Measures 0.1 Controller Software —Travel Time Synchronization 0.01 APS Pedestrian Push Button 0.01 Conflict Monitor Unit 0.01 Ethernet Switch 0.1 Emergency Vehicle Preemption Discriminator 0.1 Battery Back -Up System Invertor 0.01 Wireless Radio 0.1 CCTV Camera 8 Video Detection* 16 *Four cameras per signal Data demands for traffic signal devices place minimal data demands on the communication system network whereas video feed devices for monitoring or vehicle detection place a much higher demand. Bandwidth calculations were performed for each traffic signal system network group identified in . A full data demand scenario was evaluated for each group by assuming a demand of 24.54 Mbps for each signal. Additionally, a factor of safety was applied by accounting for potential future traffic signals per network group on a case -by -case basis. Appendix C contains the bandwidth calculations conducted for each traffic signal network group. Each network group is broken up into subgroups based on two segment types: (1) trunk segment or (2) branch segment. A trunk segment contains traffic signals along a particular roadway connected to a hub. Branch segments are connected to a trunk segment at one end and to the link extent at the other end. The data demands of all subgroups are aggregated to determine the demand of the entire traffic signal network group. Table 6-7 below summarizes aggregated data demands per traffic signal network groups. Table 6-7. Traffic Signal System Network Groups Data Demand GroupTraffic Signal Network Group 1 . .. 368.1 Group 2 245.4 Group 3 392.64 Group 4 147.24 Group 5 294.48 Group 6 220.86 Group 7 368.1 Group 8 294.48 Group 9 245.4 Group 10 171.78 Group 11 441.72 Group 12 343.56 Group 13 343.56 Aggregated data demand at each communication hub per traffic signal network group serviced is summarized in Table 6-8 below. Table Hub 1 6-8: Aggregated Data Demands at Hubs Huib Location Rancho California Rd & Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front St for Traffic Signal System Network TS Group TS Group .. Group 1 368.1 Total Demand at .. 368.1 2 Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave Group 1 368.1 368.1 3 Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd Group 2 245.4 638.04 Group 3 392.64 4 Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd Group 2 245.4 932.52 Group 3 392.64 Group 5 294.48 5 Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd Group 3 392.64 392.64 6 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nicolas Rd Group 6 220.86 220.86 7 Ynez Rd & Overland Dr Group 3 392.64 539.88 Group 4 147.24 8 Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd Group 4 147.24 809.82 Group 7 368.1 Group 8 294.48 9 Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd Group 5 294.48 907.98 Group 7 368.1 Group 9 245.4 10 Stage Rd &Rancho California Rd Group 6 220.86 1030.68 Group Group 7 368.1 Group 11 441.72 11 Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St Group 8 294.48 294.48 12 Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy Group 8 294.48 809.82 Group 10 171.78 Group 12 343.56 13 Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy Group 9 245.4 1104.3 Group 10 171.78 Group 12 343.56 Group 13 343.56 14 Butterfield Stage Rd & Temecula Pkwy Group 11 441.72 1128.84 Group 12 343.56 Group 13 343.56 6.2.' ITSS Facilities Bandwidth Calculations The ITSS department utilizes the communication system to access audio/visual (AV) systems installed throughout the City's facility campuses. Bandwidth calculations were performed for each ITSS facilities system network group identified in section 6.1.3. A full demand scenario was evaluated for each network group by utilizing the total number of surveillance cameras at each facility campus provided by the ITSS department. The data demand for one surveillance camera is equivalent to approximately 10 Mbps. summarizes the City's ITSS facilities by network group, total number of surveillance cameras at each facility campus, total data demand by facility campus, and aggregated data demand by network group. Table 6-9: ITSS Facilities System Network Groups Data Demand ID 1 Name lfretwork Civic Center Group 1 Surveillance Cameras 72 Facility Demand .. 720 Network Group Demand .. 2020 4 Old Town Parking Structure 43 430 9 Police Department Old Town Station 0 0 14 Mary Phillips Senior Center 25 250 15 Old Town 6th Street Restroom 6 60 19 Sam Hicks Monument Park 5 50 20 Temecula Valley Museum 24 240 23 Old Town Community Theater 24 240 24 Pennypickle's Workshop 3 30 3 Field Operations Center 2 15 150 290 8 Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange(TVE2) 14 140 22 Police Department Mall Storefront 3 0 0 0 13 Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park & Margarita Rec Center (MRC) 4 23 230 230 26 Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend 5 26 260 260 5 Temecula Duck Pond 6 7 70 150 7 Temecula Park & Ride 8 80 12 Temecula Help Center 0 0 18 Rotary Park 0 0 25 Safe Family Justice Centers 0 0 6 Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library 7 33 330 1090 10 Fire Station 84 0 0 11 Temecula Community Recreation Center 47 470 17 Ronald Reagan Sports Park 19 190 21 Temecula Skate Park 10 100 16 Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 8 19 190 190 Table 6-9 above may also be utilized to determine the total bandwidth needs per facility for the home - run fiber connection network configuration. Aggregated data demand at each communication hub per facility network group serviced is summarized in Table 6-10 below. Table 1 6-10: Aggregated Data Demands for IT55 Hub Location Rancho California Rd & Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front St Facilities System Facility Group AhDemand Group 1 Network GroupHub Facility DemandID .. .. 2020 2310 290 Group 2 2 Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave Group 2 290 290 3 Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd Group 3 0 0 4 Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd GrouGroup 200 230 p 4 5 Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd None 6 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nicolas Rd Group 5 260 260 7 Ynez Rd & Overland Dr Group 3 0 0 8 Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd Group 6 150 150 9 Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd Group 4 230 1320 Group 7 1090 10 Butterfield Stage Rd & Rancho California Rd Group 5 260 260 11 Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St Group 1 0 20 20 2170 Group6 0 12 Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy Group 6 150 340 Group 8 190 13 Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy Group 7 1090 1280 Group 8 190 14 Butterfield Stage Rd & Temecula Pkwy Group 8 190 190 6.3 Network Standards The Communications System Master Plan conceives a reliable and future -proof network based on the communications connection needs, topology, and network analysis. The following sections present recommendations for network standardization. 6.3.1 Communicati— 1-1--ol Standardization Modern communications systems utilize Ethernet protocol to continuously connect devices with each other and the internet. There is no longer a need to have separate data and voice networks. Ethernet/IP protocols are standard for the City's communication network devices. The City's legacy serial and analog communication systems will be upgraded to support modern ITS technologies and smart city applications. City investments in existing point -to -multi point wireless and cellular communications will be utilized on an as -needed basis, including system redundancy. 6.3.2 Network Configuration Proper network configuration is essential for a network to operate efficiently, securely, and reliably. The use of Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs) and subnets can efficiently route data within the communication system topology and minimize broadcast storms. VLANS are utilized to isolate network traffic and increase the number of available IP addresses within a network by using multiple subnets (sub- networks). Benefits to VLAN configuration include: • Offer large network scalability • Prevent crosstalk between devices • Allow for easier monitoring and identification of network traffic • Maintain organization within a network Ports on switches can be designated for a specific VLAN which provides uniformity throughout the network. The City has recently developed a Citywide IP Scheme for the traffic signal network system which includes VLANs for different traffic signal equipment. It is recommended to continue utilizing this approach to maintain proper organization. Police Department surveillance cameras at signalized intersections are maintained by the ITSS department. These cameras will be connected to the Public Works Traffic Engineering Department's switch located at the respective traffic signal controller cabinet. It is recommended that the Traffic Engineering Department assigns a dedicated port for all Police Department surveillance cameras. This will ensure that surveillance cameras are separate from the traffic signal network system. 6.3.3 Fiber Allocation and Splicing Fiber allocation and splicing are critical steps in the design, installation, and maintenance of the City's fiber optic communication system. This ensures that resources are utilized efficiently, connections are reliable, and ensures the network can service the changing demands and conditions. The City currently has no fiber allocation and splicing procedures in place. The following fiber allocation recommendations for the City's communication system buildout are provided below: • Core Layer o Dedicated fiber pair per hub to establish communications back to City's central hub (City Hall) o A total of 28 strands of fiber are required for 14 hubs (28 strands) • Distribution Layer o Dedicated fiber pair for hub -to -hub communications (2 strands) o Additional fiber pair for redundant communications (2 strands) • Access Layer o Dedicated fiber pair for network device communications (2 strands) o Additional fiber pair for redundant communications (2 strands) The Traffic Engineering and ITSS Departments will require a total of 36 strands of fiber each to accommodate the recommended redundant ring network configuration. The City's primary fiber optic ring is recommended to be comprised of 288-strands of fiber. The Traffic Engineering and ITSS Departments will each have 144-strands of fiber for their desired communication network system configuration. The recommended fiber strand allocation for the 288-strand fiber optic cable is summarized below: • Public Works Department (144 strands of fiber) o 36 strands of fiber allocated to the redundant ring network configuration o 108 strands of dark fiber • ITSS Department (144 strands of fiber) 0 64 strands of fiber allocated to the home -run fiber network configuration 0 36 strands of fiber allocated to the redundant ring network configuration o 44 strands of dark fiber Remaining dark fiber strands for each department can be utilized for future network expansion, communication needs, or may be leased out. Splicing recommendations for the City's communication system buildout are listed below: • Install splice closures to facilitate fiber optic breakout cables. • All splicing and splice enclosures shall be in underground vaults. • Install splice closures capable of housing a minimum of 288 splices on primary rings, 144 splices on secondary rings, 72 splices on linear branch connections. • 12-strand or 24-strand SMFO breakout cables to traffic signals and ITSS facility campuses. 6.4 Infrastructure and Equipment Standards The Communications System Master Plan network architecture will link all system elements together to create a ubiquitous network on which all devices communicate. The following sections present the infrastructure and equipment standards recommended to achieve the future communication system concept. 6.4.1 Communications Infrastructure The City's legacy communications infrastructure was built several decades ago and is comprised of copper wire signal interconnect cable (SIC) analog multi -drop network, serial digital wireless radios, and analog fiber optic lines network. The legacy communications system infrastructure is outdated and incapable of supporting modern ITS technologies and smart city applications. This does not include Temecula Parkway, Rancho California Road, and Winchester Road which were recently upgraded on the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 9 grant project. Communications infrastructure recommendations are listed below: • Utilize existing copper SIC conduit in good working condition to pull new fiber optic cable to resolve communications gaps and create a redundant network. • Upgrade existing #3 and #5 copper SIC pull boxes with 90-degree sweeps and tight spacing to current fiber optic standards which includes #6 pull boxes and 45-degree conduit sweeps with a minimum 16-inches clearance around conduit ends. • Utilize existing wireless radios for communications system redundancy and remote locations. • New fiber should be single -mode fiber optic cable (SMFOC) with a minimum of: o Primary rings: 288-strand SMFOC o Secondary rings: 144-stand SMFOC o Linear branches: 72-strand SMFOC o Breakout cables for traffic signals and facilities: 12-strand or 24-strand SMFOC • New communications conduit installations should be 3-inch Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). • New communications pull boxes placed along conduit runs should include Caltrans standard #6 pull box and 600 to 800-feet spacing. • New fiber splice vaults installed near traffic signal cabinets with: o 3-inch PVC conduit installed to existing traffic signal cabinet. Splice closures per recommendations in Section 6.3.3. 6.4.2 Traffic Signal Cabinet Assemblies and Equipment The existing traffic signal cabinet assemblies and equipment components were primarily developed under legacy communication protocols that are unable to support modern devices with high bandwidth needs for current applications. Modern assemblies and equipment provide the ability to utilize multiple ITS systems and smart city applications to manage traffic operations with real-time monitoring, data collection, and analysis. Related equipment recommendations include: • Replace legacy 332 traffic signal cabinets and equipment with Advanced Traffic Control (ATC) standard cabinets capable of installation on existing 332 cabinet foundations. • Replace legacy 170 controllers with ATC controllers. The City is currently in the process of replacing the remaining 170 controllers with ATC FLeX controllers. • Replace legacy type 210 and 2010 ECL conflict monitor units (CMUs) with equipment that is capable of internet protocol (IP) communications for remote monitoring. • Replace legacy serial Tomar Electronics emergency vehicle preemption (EVPE) model ranges 2000 and 3000 series with EVP equipment that is capable of IP communications for remote monitoring and coding to prevent susceptibility to illegal emitters. • Replace legacy Dimensions battery back-up (BBS) systems which are no longer manufactured and supported with BBS equipment that is capable of IP communications for remote monitoring. • New traffic signal installations should include: o 350i/352i ATC cabinet o ATC FLeX controller o Layer 2 switch o 1U FDU for 12-stand fiber break out cables 0 2010 ECLip CIVIL) 0 4000 series Tomar Electronics EVPE o Alpha FXM 1100 BBS h 4 '� rnmmilnication Hub ASsemblip,, and EaiiinmPnt Communication hubs are installed at strategic locations to complete a redundant and self -healing fiber optic communication rings topology throughout the City. As previously depicted in the fiber optic backbone rings and hubs topology map, there are nine existing communications hubs that are recommended for upgrade and five new communications hubs that are identified for installation. Recommendations for communication hub field elements include: • Layer 3 switch for the Public Works' traffic signal network. • Layer 3 switch for the ITSS network. 6.4.4 Alternative Communications The Temecula Traffic Engineering Division maintains school zone flashers and radar speed feedback signs that do not currently have communications back to the TOC. Schedules and data for each device must be physically uploaded and downloaded by City staff in the field. The Temecula ITSS Department maintains smart parking systems at the Old Town parking garage, Second Street parking lot, and Sixth Street parking lot that currently communicate through a third -party owned cellular network. Recommendations for alternative communications for these systems include: • As existing school flashers and speed feedback signs require life cycle replacement, determine on a case -by -case basis if communications between the device and the TOC should be established by wireless radios, based on adjacent infrastructure, or replaced with newer cellular -capable models. • Existing smart parking systems currently communicate through a third -party owned cellular network. It is recommended to transition smart parking systems into the City's fiber optic communication system. Existing ITSS facility campuses on leased lines are recommended to be integrated into the City's fiber optic communication system. Additionally, new facilities with planned AV systems are recommended to be connected to the City's fiber optic communication system. 6.5 Roles and Responsibilities The City of Temecula Information Technology and Support Services (ITSS) and Public Works Departments are responsible for City's communications system. To ensure the network needs of both departments are met and the roles and responsibilities for planning, building, operating, managing, and maintaining the communications system are defined, the following recommendations are made: • ITSS Department maintains primary responsibility for the planning, improvement, maintenance, testing and acceptance, inspection, and purchasing of communications network equipment for City -owned buildings and facilities (inside plant). Additionally, ITSS maintains primary responsibility for planning, improvement, maintenance, testing and acceptance, and purchasing of network equipment for City traffic and communications cabinets as well as surveillance equipment (outside plant). • Public Works Department and Traffic Engineering Division maintains primary responsibility for planning, improvement, maintenance, testing and acceptance, inspection, and purchasing of communications equipment for City traffic signals and field elements (outside plant). • ITSS Department, Public Works Department, and Traffic Division should collaborate to develop: o Centralized location for communications system documentation. o Standard Operating Procedures (SOPS) for maintaining ITSS and Public Works communication system networks, implementing new communications projects, documenting complete projects, developing communication security protocols, and defining standard specifications. o Formal planning framework to ensure communications system improvements are identified, planned, and implemented strategically and improvement project opportunities can be leveraged between both departments. o Pursuit of available funding opportunities to expand the citywide communications system, with a focus on prioritizing implementation of fiber infrastructure to City facilities with third -party leased network lines. o Formal framework for regularly updating the Communications System Topology Map to reflect existing and planned communication infrastructure. 7 Implementation Phasing and Prioritization Plan (IPP) This chapter provides the implementation phasing and prioritization plan (IPP) for Temecula's Citywide communications system based on network analysis findings and improvement recommendations. The implementation strategy is the Master Plan capstone. It establishes priorities, costs, schedule, and various funding sources to aid the City with the implementation phasing process. This chapter provides a plan for implementing a state-of-the-art fiber optic communication network that will be capable of meeting the City of Temecula's existing and future needs. Migrating the existing dated communication systems to state-of-the-art requires a staged approach where critical deficiencies are addressed first, followed by strategic conversion of the remaining communication and ITS element infrastructure. Integration and interface with recent system improvements is also accounted for in the strategic deployment plan. 7.1 Strategic Deployment Plan Existing investments in communication infrastructure, underground systems, and communication cabinet infrastructure will continue to be utilized. Obsolete legacy network equipment will be decommissioned and replaced with new modern communication technologies. Implementation of CCSMP Recommendations are divided into three phases over a ten-year period which includes immediate, near - term, and full citywide buildout. Each phase is presented in further detail in the following subsections. '.1.1 Phase 1: Immediate Upgrades (Years 1-3) Phase 1 of the implementation plan includes: • Upgrade fiber distribution units (FDUs) and install splice closures at seven existing communication hubs to accommodate the recommended upsized fiber optic cable. Communication hub upgrades at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue/Old Town Front Street will be prioritized. • Leverage existing underground and communication cabinet infrastructure to install new fiber optic communication media. Locations that require fiber breakout cables and/or communication equipment at traffic signal cabinets will be prioritized next. These are locations along corridors with existing fiber optic infrastructure that are currently not connected to the fiber optic network. • Segments with copper wire media will be upgraded next by utilizing the existing conduit to pull in new fiber. Pull box spacing and conduit sweeps will be upgraded to current fiber optic standards. • Install wireless radios and communication equipment at remaining remote locations to establish communications back to City Hall. These improvements provide the City with expanded connectivity to traffic signals along major and secondary arterials. Additionally, improvements will bridge communication gaps and make progress towards the backbone fiber optic rings topology presented in the Recommendations section. Table 7-1 includes locations with communication hub upgrades, Table 7-2 lists locations in need of fiber breakout cables and/or communication equipment at traffic signal cabinets, and Table 7-3 lists locations with existing copper wire media to be upgraded with fiber optic media. Table 7-1: Project 1 Communication Hub Upgrades ID . overnents 1 Rancho California Road & Jefferson Avenue/Old Town Front Street FDUs & Splice Closures 3 Ynez Road & Winchester Road FDUs & Splice Closures 4 Winchester Road & Margarita Road FDUs & Splice Closures 5 Winchester Road & Nicolas Road FDUs & Splice Closures 7 Ynez Road & Overland Drive FDUs & Splice Closures 8 Rancho California Road & Ynez Road FDUs & Splice Closures 9 Rancho California Road & Margarita Road FDUs & Splice Closures Table 7-2: Project 2 Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades AIntersection 21 Diaz Rd & Rancho Way Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 22 Jefferson Ave & Sanborn Ave Comm Equipment 23 Jefferson Ave & Overland Dr Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 24 Jefferson Ave & Via Montezuma Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 25 Jefferson Ave & Del Rio Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 30 Margarita Rd & Verdes Ln Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 31 Margarita Rd & North General Kearny Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 41 Margarita Rd & Pauba Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 42 Margarita Rd & Santiago Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 43 Margarita Rd & Pio Pico Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 60 Pauba Rd & Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 63 Pechanga Pkwy & Rainbow Canyon Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 64 Pechanga Pkwy & Muirfield Dr Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 65 Pechanga Pkwy & Loma Linda Rd Comm Equipment 66 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr North Comm Equipment 67 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd -Via Eduardo Comm Equipment 68 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Casino Dr North Comm Equipment 69 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Casino Dr South Comm Equipment 70 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Resort Dr-Minimart Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 71 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr South Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 72 Pechanga Pkwy & Deer Hollow Way Fiber Breakout 94 Ring Rd & Promande Mall W Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 95 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall N Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 96 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall S Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 122 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza N Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 123 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza S Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment Table 7-3: Project 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades Roadway Segment Total Signals Improvements Campanula Camino Del Sol to Meadows Parkway 1 Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Way Comm Equipment Date Street Ynez Road to Margarita Road 3 Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Comm Equipment Deer Pechanga Parkway to Peppercorn Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Hollow Z Way Drive Comm Equipment De Portola Meadows Parkway to Campanula Way Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road E 1 Comm Equipment Margarita Moraga Road to N General Kearny Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road Road 5 Comm Equipment Margarita Rancho California Road to Avenida Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road Barca 3 Comm Equipment Margarita Winchester Road to Date Street 3 Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road Comm Equipment Meadows Rancho California Road to Pauba Road 5 Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Parkway Comm Equipment Moraga Rancho California Road to Margarita — Fiber Trunk Cable Road Road Nicolas Winchester Road to N. General Kearny Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road Road 2 Comm Equipment Nighthawk Vail Ranch Parkway/Redhawk Parkway Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Pass to Butterfield Stage Road 2 Comm Equipment Overland Ynez Road to Margaria Road 1 Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Drive Comm Equipment Pauba Meadows Parkway to Butterfield Stage — Fiber Trunk Cable Road Road Wolf Valley Pechanga Parkway to Peppercorn Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Breakout, & Road Drive 1 Comm Equipment There are programmed CIP and development projects that will install fiber optic and wireless communication infrastructure within the next three years. These improvements complement phase 1 of the implementation plan. Table 7-4 lists locations with planned fiber optic infrastructure and associated projects. Table 7-4: Phase 1 CIP Fiber tructure s HSIP Cycle 11 Butterfield Wolf Store Road to Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Citywide Signal Timing Stage Road Avenida Lestonnac 5 Breakout, & Comm Equipment Project RoadwayTotal "Fr o Signals I & Communication ��= Fiber Trunk Cable, Fiber Santiago Road Upgrades Ynez Road 10 Breakout, & Comm Overland Drive e Equipment Ynez Road Private Winchester Road to Fiber Breakout & Comm Ynez Road 1 Development Equity Drive Equipment Joseph Road to Nicolas Road Nicolas Butterfield Stage — Conduit Extension Road Road Additionally, the HSIP Cycle 11 project will install wireless communication infrastructure and communication cabinet equipment at 11 intersections and are listed in Table 7-5 below. New radios and communication equipment will be installed at remaining remote locations and are included in Table 7-6. Table 7-5: Phase 1 CIP Wireless Infrastructure Upgrades ID Location �� Improvement 47 Meadows Parkway & Rancho Vista Road Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 56 North General Kearny Road & Camino Campos Verdes Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 61 Pauba Road & Via Rami/Linfield Way Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 87 Rancho Vista Road & Mira Loma Drive Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 88 Redhawk Parkway & Via Rio Temecula/Wolf Store Road Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 89 Redhawk Parkway & Overland Trail/Paseo Parallon Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 90 Redhawk Parkway & Vail Ranch Parkway Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 91 Redhawk Parkway & Wolf Valley Road Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 92 Redhawk Parkway & Peppercorn Drive Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 93 Redhawk Parkway & El Chimisal Road/Tehachapi Pass Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment 55 Nighthawk Pass & Vail Ranch Parkway/Redhawk Parkway Wireless Radios & Comm Equipment Table 7-6: Project 4 Wireless Communications at Remote Locations The Citywide Surveillance Cameras project is also programmed in the CIP and will provide fiber connections to six ITSS facilities within the next three years. Table 7-7 below lists the facilities that will be connected to the fiber optic network. Table 7-7. Phase 1 CIP Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities 0 Name A.. 14 Mary Phillips Senior Center 41845 6th St Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 15 Old Town 6th Street Restroom 41952 6th St Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment ID Name Address Improvements 19 Sam Hicks Monument Park 41970 Moreno Rd Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 20 Temecula Valley Museum 28314 Mercedes St Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 23 Old Town Community Theater 42051 Main St Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 24 Pennypickle's Workshop 42081 Main St Surveillance Cameras, Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment A total of 84 traffic signals and six ITSS facilities will have established communications back to City Hall via fiber with Phase 1. Figure 7-1 on the following page depicts Phase 1 improvements. Figure 7-1: Phase 1 Immediate Communication Upgrades Topology 1. Civic Center 11. Temecula Community Recreation Center 20. Temecula Valley Museum 2. Civic Center Traffic Control Center 12. Temecula Help Center 21. Temecula Skate Park 3. Field Operations Center 13. Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park 22. Police Department Mall Storefront 4. Old Town Parking Structure & Margarita Rec Center (MRC) 23. Old Town Community Theater 5. Temecula Duck Pond 14. Mary Phillips Senior Center 24. Pennypickle's Workshop 6. Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library 15. Old Town 6th Street Restroom 25. SAFE Family Justice Centers 7. Temecula Park & Ride 16. Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 26. Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend 8. Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exhange (TVE2) 17. Ronald Regan Sports Park 27. Police Department Southwest Station 9. Police Department Old Town Station 18. Rotary Park 10. Fire Station 84 19. Sam Hicks Monument Park r— — — — — — — — — — — — — I I yFv 5ssr % 5T� ro Apo ry2o I P 9 I ✓psT SyNT,q z ga I 0 00 z I I I L— — — — — — — — — — — — # Traffic Signal System ID Existing Fiber and Conduit ._.._.._.._.....—..—..—..—..—........—.......� i --, Pr - -� Q City Facility ID — New Fiber in Existing Conduit O Traffic Signal - Existing Fiber Infrastructure (49) — New Fiber and New Conduit O Traffic Signal - Communication Upgrades (83) O Caltrans Traffic Signal (8) O Existing Communication Hub (2) - Communication Hub Upgrades (7) ONew Wireless Radio New Conduit - - - - New Point -to -Point Wireless Communications Minor Road Major Road Freeways �.._.,� City Boundary City Network Facilities New Fiber Connection (1 GB) Existing Fiber Connection (1 GB) Existing E-Line Connection (500MB) N E S 1.2 Phase 1 Order of Magnitude Costs Cost estimate quantities were obtained from the CCSMP GIS database and aerial imagery. Quantities for conduit were increased by 15% and fiber optic cable by 25% to account for any unforeseeable factors. Cost estimates include a construction contingency of 30%. An additional 30% was added to account for soft costs such as preliminary engineering and construction management. Unit price costs were increased by 7%for phase 2 and 3 to account for inflation. The Order of Magnitude Costs for Phase 1 are summarized in the following tables below. -8 nunication Hub Upgrades Costs 1 Furnish & Install 4U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination 6 EA $15,000 $90,000 2 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 6 EA $5,000 $30,000 3 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $140,000 Soft Costs (30%): $42,000 Construction Contingency (30%): $42,000 Grand Total: $224,000 Table 7-9: Project 2 Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades Costs 1 Item Description Quantity Furnish & Install Ethernet Layer 2 Ethernet Switch 25 EA $8,500 $212,500 2 Furnish & Install 1U FDU, Splice Cassette, and C25 Cabinet Termination. EA $3,500 $87,500 3 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 5,000 LF $5 $25,000 4 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $340,000 Soft Costs (30%): $102,000 Construction Contingency (30%): $102,000 Grand Total: $544,000 Table 7-10: Project 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades Costs 1 DescriptionItem Item Furnish & Install Ethernet Layer 2 Ethernet Switch Quantity 29 EA Price $8,500 U96i $246,500 2 Furnish & Install 1U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination. 29 EA $3,500 $101,500 3 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 32,000 LF $6 $192,000 4 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 33,000 LF $5 $165,000 5 Furnish & Install 72-strand SMFOC 6,000 LF $5 $30,000 6 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Ca"129 500 LF $5 $32,500 7 Furnish & Install Splice Closure EA $5,000 1 $285,000 Item Item Description Quantity 8 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 29 Unit Unit EA $13,000 $377,000 9 Remove & Salvage Existing Pull Box. Furnish & Install 57 No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps EA $5,000 $285,000 10 RS Existing Pull Box and Connect Existing Conduit 57 with New Continuous Conduit EA $5,000 $285,000 11 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS 1 $30,000 $30,000 Sub Total: $1,889,500 Soft Costs (30%): $566,850 Construction Contingency (30%): $566,850 Grand Total: $3,023,200 Table 7-21: Project 4 Wireless Communications at Remote Locations Costs QuantityItem Item Description Pri 'Ar 1 Furnish & Install Wireless Radio 3 EA $8,000 $24,000 2 Furnish & Install Repeater 2 EA $10,000 $20,000 3 Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch 2 EA $8,500 $17,000 7 Wireless Testing and Documentation 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total: $66,000 Soft Costs (30%): $19,800 Construction Contingency (30%): $19,800 Grand Total: $105,600 7.1.3 Phase 2: Near -Term Upgrades (Years 4-6) Phase 2 of the implementation plan includes: • Prioritize upgrading existing fiber optic infrastructure along Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway, and Winchester Road. o This includes upsizing fiber optic cable (FOC) size, proper fiber allocation, and new splice closures. o Fiber optic infrastructure upgrades at these three corridors are critical as they constitute the majority of the City's primary backbone fiber optic ring. • Fiber distribution units and splice closures at the remaining two existing communication hubs along Winchester Road and Temecula Parkway will be upgraded to accommodate the recommended upsized fiber optic cable. • Three new communication hubs on Rancho California Road/Butterfield Stage Road, Temecula Parkway/Margarita Road-Redhawk Parkway, and Temecula Parkway/Butterfield Stage Road will be included in Phase 2. Programmed CIP projects that correlate to Phase 2 include Diaz Road Expansion, Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive/Overland Drive Widening, and Nicolas Road Extension. Project limits for the three programmed CIP projects are summarized in Table 7-12 below. Table 7-1Z: Phase Z CIP Fiber Uptic infrastructure implementation RoadwayProject Winchester Road to Conduit & Fiber Trunk Diaz Road Expansion Diaz Road Rancho California Road Cable Murrieta Creek Bridge/Overland Overland Diaz Road to Jefferson Conduit & Fiber Trunk Drive Widening Drive Avenue Cable Joseph Road to Nicolas Road Extension Nicolas Road Fiber Trunk Cable Butterfield Stage Road Five ITSS facilities will be connected to the fiber optic network in Phase 2. New conduit, pull boxes, and fiber breakout cables will be installed from the nearest adjacent signalized intersection with existing fiber infrastructure. Table 7-13 lists the five ITSS facilities that will receive fiber connections. Table 7-13: Phase 2 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities Name AddressID 11 Temecula Community Recreation Center 30875 Rancho Vista Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 16 Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 32380 Deer Hollow Way Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 17 Ronald Reagan Sports Park 30875 Rancho Vista Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 21 Temecula Skate Park 42569 Margarita Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 22 Police Department Mall Storefront 40820 Winchester Rd Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment A summary of Phase 2 improvements is illustrated in Figure 7-2. Figure 7-2: Phase 2 Near -Term Communication Upgrades Topology 1. Civic Center 11. Temecula Community Recreation Center 20. Temecula Valley Museum 2. Civic Center Traffic Control Center 12. Temecula Help Center 21. Temecula Skate Park 3. Field Operations Center 13. Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park 22. Police Department Mall Storefront 4. Old Town Parking Structure & Margarita Rec Center (MRC) 23. Old Town Community Theater 5. Temecula Duck Pond 14. Mary Phillips Senior Center 24. Pennypickle's Workshop 6. Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library 15. Old Town 6th Street Restroom 25. SAFE Family Justice Centers 7. Temecula Park & Ride 16. Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 26. Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend 8. Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exhange (TVE2) 17. Ronald Regan Sports Park 27. Police Department Southwest Station 9. Police Department Old Town Station 18. Rotary Park 10. Fire Station 84 19. Sam Hicks Monument Park r— — — — — — — — — — — — — # Traffic Signal System ID 0 City Facility ID OExisting Wireless Radio Existing Fiber and Conduit -j O Traffic Signal - Established Communications (132) - FOC & Comm Conduit Upgrades O Caltrans Traffic Signal (8) O Existing Communication Hub (7) OCommunication Hub Upgrades (2) - New Communication Hub (3) FOC Upgrades New Fiber in Existing Conduit New Fiber and New Conduit - - - - Point -to -Point Wireless Communications �f © J�1 zs Minor Road Major Road Freeways �.._..� City Boundary City Network Facilities New Fiber Connection (1 GB) N Existing Fiber Connection (1 GB) W E Existing E-Line Connection (500MB) S 7.1.4 Phase 2 Order of Magnitude Costs The Order of Magnitude Costs for Phase 2 are summarized below. Table 7-14: Project 5 Communication Infrastructure Upgrades at Rancho California Rd, Temecula Pkwy, and Winchester Road Costs Item Item Description iantilmi Uni =7 1 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 73,000 LF $6.50 $474,500 2 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 2,000 LF $5.40 $10,800 3 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 36 EA $14,000 $504,000 4 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 36 EA $5,400 $194,400 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Sub Total: $1,213,700 Soft Costs (30%): $364,110 Construction Contingency (30%): $364,110 Grand Total: $1,941,920 Table 7-15: Project 6 Communication Hub Upgrades Costs Item 1 Item Description Quantity U7ni Furnish & Install 4U FDU, Splice Cassette, and 2 EA Cabinet Termination ah"&, $16,100 $32,000 2 Furnish & Install New Communication Hub 3 EA $50,000 $150,000 3 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $202,000 Soft Costs (30%): $60,600 Construction Contingency (30%): $60,600 Grand Total: $323,200 Table 7-16: Project 7 Fiber Optic Infrastructure at ITSS Facilities Costs amm 1 Item . Quantity �Al Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit 8,000 unit Pric LF $70 $560,000 2 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 8,500 LF $5.40 $45,900 3 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit 14 Sweeps EA $5,400 $75,600 4 Fiber Termination at City Facility & Equipment 5 EA $25,000 $125,000 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $821,500 Soft Costs (30%): $246,450 Construction Contingency (30%): $246,450 Grand Total: $1,314,400 7.1.5 Phase 3: Citywide Buildout (Years 7-10) Buildout of the Citywide communication system network will be completed in Phase 3. • Remaining segments with a low fiber strand count will be upgraded. Table 7-17 lists remaining roadway segments and proposed fiber strand count. • New conduit and fiber will be installed along remaining gaps. Table 7-18 lists roadway segments with proposed conduit and fiber strand count. • New communication hubs will be installed at Butterfield Stage Road/Nicolas Road and at Old Town Front Street/Santiago Road -First Street/ • Remaining ITSS facilities will be connected to the fiber optic communication system network. Table 7-19 below lists segments that will receive fiber optic infrastructure upgrades and installations during Phase 3. i avie ID 1 i-1 is vnase s riper uprIC Roadway Business Park Dr/Diaz Rd Lavie upgraaes Segment Rancho California Rd to Rancho Way 288-strand SMFOC 2 Jefferson Ave Rancho California Rd to Winchester Rd 288-strand SMFOC 3 Margarita Rd Pio Pico Rd to Pauba Rd 288-strand SMFOC 4 Winchester Rd to N General Kearny Rd 288-strand SMFOC 5 Pauba Rd Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 to Margarita Rd 288-strand SMFOC 6 Pechanga Pkwy Deer Hollow Way to Temecula Pkwy 288-strand SMFOC 7 Promenade Mall N Ynez Rd to Ring Rd 144-strand SMFOC 8 Promenade Mall W Winchester Rd to Ring Rd 144-strand SMFOC 9 Rancho Way Business Park Dr to Diaz Rd 288-strand SMFOC 10 Ring Rd Promenade Mall N to Promenade Mall W 144-strand SMFOC 11 Ynez Rd Date St to Equity Dr 72-strand SMFOC 12 Overland Dr to Winchester Rd 288-strand SMFOC 13 Waverly Ln/Temecula Center Dr to Date St 144-strand SMFOC Table 7-18: Phase 3 New Fiber Optic Cable and Conduit along Gaps 1 Butterfield Stage Rd Nighthawk Pass to Wolf Store Rd 288-strand SMFOC 2 First St Western Bypass to Old Town Front St 288-strand SMFOC 3 La Serena Way Meadows Pkwy to Butterfield Stage Rd 72-strand SMFOC 4 Margarita Rd Moraga Rd to Avenida Barca 288-strand SMFOC 8 Meadows Pkwy Rancho Vista Rd to Rancho California Rd 72-strand SMFOC 6 N General Kearny Rd Margarita Rd to Camino Campo Verdes 72-strand SMFOC 7 Old Town Front St Santiago Rd/First St to Temecula Pkwy 288-strand SMFOC 8 Pauba Rd Margarita Rd to Via Rami/Linfield Way 72-strand SMFOC 9 Peppercorn Dr Deer Hollow Way to Redhawk Pkwy 288-strand SMFOC 10 Promenade Mall S Ynez Rd to Ring Rd 144-strand SMFOC 11 Pujol St First St to Western Bypass 72-strand SMFOC 12 Rancho Vista Rd Ynez Rd to Mira Loma Dr 72-strand SMFOC 13 Redhawk Pkwy Peppercorn Dr to Nighthawk Pass 288-strand SMFOC 14 Redhawk Pkwy Wolf Valley Rd to Temecula Pkwy 144-strand SMFOC 15 Ring Rd Promenade Mall W to Promenade Mall E 144-strand SMFOC 16 Ring Rd Promenade Mall S to Promenade Mall N 144-strand SMFOC 17 Temecula Pkwy Old Town Front St/Western Bypass to Bedford Ct 288-strand SMFOC 18 Western Bypass Rancho California Rd to Temecula Pkwy 288-strand SMFOC 19 Wolf Valley Rd Wolf Creek Dr N/S to Redhawk Pkwy 144-strand SMFOC Table 7-19: Phase 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Implementation at ITSS Facilities Name AddressID 12 Temecula Help Center 28922 Pujol St Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 18 Rotary Park 28816 Pujol St Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment 25 SAFE Family Justice Centers 28910 Pujol St Fiber Breakout & Comm Equipment Citywide buildout is illustrated in Figure 7-3 on the following page. Figure 7-3: Phase 3 Citywide Buildout Topology 1. Civic Center 11. Temecula Community Recreation Center 20. Temecula Valley Museum 2. Civic Center Traffic Control Center 12. Temecula Help Center 21. Temecula Skate Park 3. Field Operations Center 13. Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park 22. Police Department Mall Storefront 4. Old Town Parking Structure & Margarita Rec Center (MRC) 23. Old Town Community Theater 5. Temecula Duck Pond 14. Mary Phillips Senior Center 24. Pennypickle's Workshop 6. Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Library 15. Old Town 6th Street Restroom 25. SAFE Family Justice Centers 7. Temecula Park & Ride 16. Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park 26. Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend 8. Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exhange (TVE2) 17. Ronald Regan Sports Park 27. Police Department Southwest Station 9. Police Department Old Town Station 18. Rotary Park 10. Fire Station 84 19. Sam Hicks Monument Park © J�1 26 r— — — — — — — — — — — — — 00 i i i i i L — — — # Traffic Signal System ID Existing Fiber �.._..� City Boundary Q City Facility ID FOC & Comm Conduit Upgrades City Network Facilities O Traffic Signal -Established Communications (132) New Fiber and New Conduit Existing Fiber Connection (1 GB) O Caltrans Traffic Signal (8) Minor Road New Fiber Connection (1 GB) N O Existing Communication Hub (12) Major Road - New Communication Hub (2) Freeways W E S 7.1.6 Phase 3 Order of Magnitude Costs The Order of Magnitude Costs for Phase 3 are summarized below. le 7-20: Project 8 Fiber Optic Cable and Communication Conduit Up,7rades Costs RLItem 1 Description Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC Quantity 50,000 LF Unit $6.90 m "ou n $345,000 2 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 5,000 LF $5.70 $28,500 3 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 14 EA $14,900 $208,600 4 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 14 EA $5,700 $79,800 5 Remove & Salvage Existing Pull Box. Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 70 EA $5,700 $399,000 6 RS Existing Pull Box and Connect Existing Conduit with New Continuous Conduit 70 EA $5,700 $399,000 7 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $1,479,900 Soft Costs (30%): $443,970 Construction Contingency (30%): $443,970 Grand Total: $2,367,840 Table 1 7-21: Project 9 New Fiber Optic Cable and Conduit Item Description Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch along Gaps QuantityItem 13 Costs EA Price $9,700 $126,100 2 Furnish & Install 1U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination 13 EA $4,000 $52,000 3 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 44,000 LF $6.90 $303,600 4 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 16,000 LF $5.70 $91,200 5 Furnish & Install 72-strand SMFOC 17,500 LF $5.70 $99,750 6 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 2,500 LF $5.70 $14,250 7 Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit 70,000 LF $80 $5,600,000 8 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 13 EA $14,900 $193,700 9 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 100 EA $5,700 $570,400 10 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $7070,600 Soft Costs (30%): $2,121,180 Construction Contingency (30%): $2,121,180 Grand Total: $11,312,960 Table 7-22: Project 10 New Communication Hubs Costs 1 QuantityItem Item Description Ityn Furnish & Install New Communication Hub 2 EA $57,000 —W $114,000 2 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $129,000 Soft Costs (30%): $38,700 Construction Contingency (30%): $38,700 Grand Total: $206,400 Table 7-23: Project 11 Fiber Optic Infrastructure at ITSS Facilities Costs QuantityItem Item Description 1 Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit 3,500 LF $80 $280,000 2 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 3,200 LF $5.70 $18,240 3 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 6 EA $5,700 $34,200 4 Fiber Termination at City Facility & Equipment 3 EA $28,500 m $85,500 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $437,940 Ell Soft Costs (30%): $131,382 Construction Contingency (30%): $131,382 Grand Total: $700,704 7.2 Order of Magnitude Costs The following tables provide a summary of costs for the communications system master plan deployment and are organized by phase. CIP projects mentioned in the previous section are not accounted for in the order of magnitude costs below. Table 7-24: Phase 1 Dealovment Costs Project # 1 Descriptiop=11M�� Total Communication Hub Upgrades $224,000 2 Traffic Signal Communication Upgrades $544,000 3 Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades $3,023,200 4 Wireless Communications at Remote Locations $105,600 Grand Total: $3,896,800 Table 7-25: Phase 2 Denlovment Costs Communication Infrastructure Upgrades at Rancho California Road, 5 Temecula Parkway, and Winchester Road $1,941,920 6 Communication Hub Upgrades $323,200 7 Fiber Optic Infrastructure at ITSS Facilities $1,314,400 Table 7-26: Phase 3 Deployment Costs Table 7-27. Deployment Costs by Phase 1 1 through 3 $3,896,800 2 4 through 6 $3,579,520 3 7 through 10 $14,587,904 The order of magnitude cost estimate for the Citywide Communication System Master Plan is $22,064,904. 7.3 Funding Sources The Temecula Public Works and ITSS Departments have utilized a variety of funding sources to plan, build, operate, and maintain the citywide communications systems. Potential funding sources for the CCSMP IPP are identified in the following sections including general funds, capital improvement program (CIP) funds, special revenue fee -based funds, and State and Federal grant funding opportunities. It is recommended that local funding from the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) be allocated and /or reassigned for the improvements identified in the CCSMP. Pursuit of outside grant funding opportunities is also recommended to supplement local funds and accelerate full CCSMP deployment. 7.3.1 Local General Funds and Capital Improvement Program The City of Temecula's Annual Operating Budget is a financial plan for meeting the goals, programs, policies, and service priorities that the City is committed to providing its citizens. The City's General Fund is a general operating fund that accounts for all resources that are not legally restricted to expenditure for specific purposes, which are designated as special revenue funds. The City of Temecula's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a comprehensive five-year program that identifies individual capital improvement projects and funding sources. Capital project types include circulation, housing, infrastructure, parks and recreation, and Community Facility Districts (CFD). CIP funding sources include City funds, Federal, State, and Local Grants, CFD Funds, Successor Agency Funds, and Special Revenue funds. The City of Temecula's adopted fiscal year (FY) 2024-2028 CIP includes $606,075,009 in funding for capital improvements citywide. Table 7-28: FY2O24-2028 CIP Forecasted Revenue 7.3.2 Development Impact Fees The City of Temecula collects one-time Development Impact Fees (DIF) based on residential and commercial land use and size to mitigate the impact of new development on the community. Funding is used for capital improvements, including transportation infrastructure improvements to maintain existing levels of services throughout the City. .3.3 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) The City of Temecula is a Member Jurisdiction of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Member jurisdictions participate in a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program, which collects fees for new residential, commercial, and industrial development to provide improvements for local and regional traffic systems and ensure new development pays its fair share for the increased traffic created. Fees are based on the land use type and size of the proposed development. WRCOG administers and allocates funds based on Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) jurisdiction groupings, referred to as TUMF Zones, which the City of Temecula receives based on the current TUMF Administration Plan. Fees are used for planning, engineering, right-of-way acquisition, and construction for eligible TUMF facilities and acquisition of open space. 7.3.4 Gas Tax Voters approved Senate Bill 1, known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act, which collects taxes based on fuel and annual vehicle registration fees to fund transportation improvements. Local governments receive a portion of the funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account. Funding in Temecula is used to account for revenues apportioned under the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. '.3.5 Grants State and Federal grant funding opportunities that the City of Temecula can pursue to supplement local funding sources for the deployment of the CCSMP Implementation Phasing and Prioritization Plan are presented in this subsection. 7.3.6 California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Rural and Urban Broadband Consortia California Senate Bill (SB) 156, S134, and Assembly Bill (AB) 164, and AB 14 were signed by the Governor in 2021 to authorize the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to collect up to $150 million per year until December 31, 2032 for use by the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) program, which distributes the Rural and Urban Regional Broadband Consortia Account. Funding is provided to eligible consortiums to facilitate deployment of broadband infrastructure and services. Based on the 2023 CASF Active Consortia Regions, the City of Temecula falls within the Inland Empire Regional Broadband Consortium. This consortium covers San Bernardino and Riverside Counties with representatives from organizations including, but not limited to, local and regional government, public safety, education, healthcare, libraries, parks and recreation, workforce and community -based organizations, tourism, agriculture, and air pollution control or air quality management districts. Eligible funding activities achieve the following objectives: 1. Collaborating with the CPUC to engage regional consortia, local officials, internet service providers (ISPs), stakeholders, and consumers regarding priority areas and cost-effective strategies 2. Identifying CASF infrastructure projects or broadband deployment projects where providers can expand and improve their infrastructure and service offerings to achieve the goal of reaching 98% broadband deployment in each consortia region 3. Applicant assistance for broadband deployment project development/grant application processes 4. Conducting activities that will lead to CASF infrastructure projects or broadband deployment projects, including but not limited to: a. Project permitting b. Engagement and technical assistance for local government officials and communities c. Inventory of public assets (e.g. rights -of -way, publicly owned towers, public utility poles, equipment housing, publicly owned property, etc.), aggregating demand, and identification and updates of priority areas 5. Assisting the CPUC to in publicizing requests for wireline testing volunteers 6. Assisting the CPUC to promote broadband deployment in California through federal funding and other programs including Middle -Mile, Broadband Loan Loss Reserve, and Local Agency Technical Assistance under SB 156 and AB 164 Grant cycles occur annually with application openings in June and due by July. Approximately $10 million in funding is available each cycle. 1.3.7 California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account California Senate Bill (SB) 156, S134, and Assembly Bill (AB) 164, and AB 14 were signed by the Governor in 2021 to authorize the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to collect up to $150 million per year until December 31, 2032 for use by the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) program, which distributes Broadband Infrastructure Grant Account. Funding is provided to local agencies, public entities, and wireless carries for building and deploying broadband networks in underserved or unnerved locations, identified on the California Broadband Map as having no fixed facility -based broadband providers with service at speeds of at least 25 Mpbs download and 3 Mbps upload. Eligible projects are within an unnerved (no internet connectivity) or underserved (internet speeds at or below 10 Mbps download and 1 Mbps upload) areas and can provide broadband service speeds of at least 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload. Grant funding can also be used to subsidize middle -mile and last -mile infrastructure to expand the State's broadband network, with open access / interconnection points provided wherever technically feasible at nondiscriminatory, reasonable, and equal terms. This can include, but is not limited to, lease of dark fiber, local transmission services, transport, and dedicated internet access services to other CASF-funded grant recipients. The maximum grant amount is $25 million. Funding varies between 60% for baseline eligible projects to 100% based on specific program criteria. Additional 30% funding is given for areas with US Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) or Department of Housing and Community Development's designation for low-income. Additional 10%funding increments are given for: 1. Meeting 3 of the 6 following characteristics: a. Rugged or difficult terrain including mountains, desert, and national / state forest b. Unincorporated community c. More than 10 miles from the nearest hospital d. More than 10 miles to the nearest state of federal highway e. US Census Bureau designation of rural census block f. CPUC Fire -Threat Map designation of extreme or elevated fire threat area 2. Existing outside plant infrastructure, including poles and conduit, that may be upgraded for broadband deployment. 3. Making a significant contribution to the program goal, including areas within broadband consortium regions that do not have broadband internet service at speeds of 25 Mps download / 3 Mps upload to 98% of households. 4. Low-income areas that offer State / Federal -subsidized service or low-cost broadband plans Grant cycles occur annually with application openings in November / December and due by April of the following year. 7.3.8 California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program The Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program is a federal funding program authorized by the Infrastructure, Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), that is implemented nationally by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). BEAD funding for the State of California is administered through the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which recently submitted a draft Five -Year Action Plan to NTIA. Following approval and adoption, the CPUC will be able to begin selecting subgrantees based on competitive sub -grant awards, by mid-2024 at the earliest, to carry out broadband deployment activities for: 1. Unserved service projects (i.e. no internet access or under 25 Mps download / 3 Mbps upload) 2. Underserved service projects (i.e. under 100 Mps download /20 Mbps upload) 3. Community anchor institution projects (i.e. 1 Gps download/1 Gps upload for schools, library, health clinic / center, hospital, higher education, public housing organization, or community support organization) 4. Broadband data collection, mapping, and planning 5. Installing internet and Wi-Fi infrastructure or providing reduced -cost broadband within multi- family residential buildings 6. Broadband adoption programs 7. Other activities determined by NTIA Approximately $4 billion in funding is anticipated to be available from a combination of national BEAD and State Legislature allocations. 7.3.9 Calitornia Department of Technology (CDT) Digital Equity Act The Digital Equity Act program is a federal funding program authorized by the IIJA / BIL and implemented nationally by the NTIA that establishes three grant programs that promote digital equity and inclusion. 1. State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program: Formal grant program for States, Territories, and Tribal governments to develop digital equity plans. California has received over $4 million in funding and sub -grants for local and regional stakeholders are anticipated. 2. Digital Equity Capacity Building Grant Program: Formula grant program for States, Territories, and Tribal governments to implement digital capacity projects. This program is actively being developed by NTIA and approximately $1.44 billion in funding is anticipated to be available. 3. Digital Equity Competitive Grant Program: Annual 5-year competitive grant program to implement digital equity projects. This program is actively being developed by NTIA and approximately $1.25 billion in funding is anticipated to be available. Digital Equity Act funding for the State of California is administered through the California Department of Technology (CDT), which is actively developing the State Digital Equity Plan (SDEP). The Broadband for All Action Plan will focus on the following goals to meet the State's vision of establishing 98% high-speed internet access and 90% statewide adoption: 1. Access to high-speed internet at homes, schools and libraries 2. Access to affordable internet services and devices 3. Access to digital skills and training 7.3.10 Caltrans Higriway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is a federal funding program authorized by the IIJA / BIL to provide States with funding to achieve significant reduction in fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Local Assistance (DLA) administers California's local agency share of HSIP funds. Projects must be identified on the basis of eligible safety countermeasures, crash experience, and benefit -cost ratio analyses. Based on the 2022 Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM) v1.6, there are three countermeasures that would be eligible for deploying traffic signal technology upgrades that support CCSMP implementation: 1. S3 Improve Signal Timing (Coordination, Phases, Red, Yellow, or Operation) 2. S5 Install Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption Systems 3. S21PB: Modify Signal Phasing to Implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Grant cycles occur every two years, with call -for -projects announced in May and applications due in September. Cycle 12 is anticipated to be announced in Spring 2024. Available funding typically ranges between $180 million and $240 million, with agencies limited to $10 million in total funding each cycle. 7.3.11 US Department of Transportation (USDOT) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) is a federal funding program authorized by the IIJA / BIL to provide regional, local, and Triabal funding to prevent roadway deaths and serious injuries. Implementation grants carry out specific projects and strategies identified in eligible existing Action Plans that address roadway safety. Implementation grant projects can utilize innovative technologies and strategies to reduce serious deaths and injuries. Eligible commercially available technologies include, but are not limited to: 1. Intelligent Transportation Systems 2. Vehicle -to -Infrastructure (C2X) communications 3. Adaptive signal timing 4. Variable speed limits Grant cycles occur annually until 2026 with notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) announced in April and applications due in July. FY24 is anticipated to be announced in Spring 2024. Approximately $1 billion in funding is available, with implementation grant awards ranging from $2.5 million to $25 million. ..3.12 USDOT Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) The Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) grant program is a federal funding program authorized by the IIJA / BIL to provide public sector agencies with funding to plan, prototype, and implement advanced smart community technologies and systems in order to improve transportation efficiency and safety. Eligible projects demonstrate at least one technology category: 1. Coordinated automation 2. Connected vehicles 3. Sensors 4. Systems integration 5. Delivery / logistics 6. Innovative aviation 7. Smart grid 8. Traffic signals Grant cycles occur annually until 2026 with notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) announced in August and applications due in October. FY24 funding is anticipated to be announced in Fall of 2024. Approximately $100 million in funding is available, with implementation grant awards ranging from $250,000 to $15 million. /.3.13 Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovation (ATTAIN) The IIJA / BIL amended the Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment (ATCMTD) program to be renamed Advanced Transportation Technologies and Innovative Mobility Development (ATTIMD). The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) implements and refers to the ATTIMD program as Advanced Transportation Technology and Innovation (ATTAIN), which is a federal funding program that provides competitive grants to deploy, install, and operate advanced transportation technologies to improve safety, mobility, efficiency, system performance, intermodal connectivity, and infrastructure return on investment. Eligible advanced transportation and congestion management technologies include: 1. Advanced transportation technologies to improve emergency evacuation and responses by Federal, State, and local authorities 2. Integrated corridor management systems 3. Advanced parking reservation or variable pricing systems 4. Electronic pricing, toll collection, and payment systems 5. Technology that enhances high occupancy vehicle toll lanes, cordon pricing, or congestion pricing 6. Integration of transportation service payment systems 7. Advanced mobility access and on -demand transportation service technologies, such as dynamic ridesharing and other shared -use mobility applications and information systems to support human services for elderly and disabled individuals 8. Retrofitting dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) technology to cellular vehicle -to - everything (C-V2X) technology 9. Advanced transportation technologies Grant cycles occur annually until 2026 with notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) announced in September and applications due in November. FY24 is anticipated to be announced in Fall 2024. Approximately $60 million in funding is available, with implementation grant awards ranging from $2.5 million to $25 million. Table 7-29 on the following page summarizes grant funding programs by agency, program, and eligible activities. Table 7-29: Grant Funding Programs ProgramAgency Grant Projects for broadband infrastructure and service deployment that support program objectives for: - Collaboration with CPUC, regional consortia, local officials, ISPs, stakeholders, and consumers on California priority areas and cost-effective strategies Advanced Services - Identifying CASF infrastructure projects and California Public Fund (CASF) Rural broadband service deployment projects Utilities Commission and Urban - Applicant assistance for broadband deployment (CPUC) Regional project development and grant processes Broadband - Activities that lead to CASF infrastructure projects or broadband deployment projects, including Consortia project permitting, engagement / technical assistance, inventory of public assets - Wireline testing volunteers - Promoting broadband deployment through federal / other funding programs Projects for broadband infrastructure and service deployment that support underserved areas (below California Public CASF Broadband 10/1 Mbps) or unserved areas that can provide Utilities Commission Infrastructure broadband service speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps. (CPUC) Grant Account Includes middle -mile and last -mile infrastructure if reasonable open access / interconnection points are provided to other CASF-funded grant recipients. Projects that support the California BEAD 5-Year Action Plan's Implementation Plan for: - Unserved areas (below 25/3 Mbps) / high -cost National locations in the State Telecommunications Broadband Equity, - Underserved areas (below 100/20 Mps) and Information Access, and - Community anchor institutions (1/1 Gps) Administration (NTIA) & Deployment - Broadband data collection, mapping, and planning California Public Utilities (BEAD) Program - Installing internet and Wi-Fi infrastructure or Commission (CPUC) providing reduced -cost broadband within multi- family residential buildings - Broadband adoption programs National Projects that support the forthcoming California State Telecommunications Digital Equity Plan and implement digital equity and and Information inclusion. The Broadband for All Plan will focus on: Administration (NTIA) & Digital Equity Act - Access to high-speed internet at homes, schools, California Department and libraries of Technology (CDT) - Access to affordable internet services and devices - Access to digital skills and training ProgramAgency Grant Projects that have up to 3 safety countermeasures (CMs) from the Local Roadway Safety Manual. CMs California Department Highway Safety that may be used for technology upgrades include: of Transportation Improvement - S3: Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, (Caltrans) Program (HSIP) red, yellow, or operation) - S5: Install emergency vehicle pre-emption systems - S21PB: Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Projects included in an eligible Action Plan that use innovative technologies and strategies to reduce deaths and serious injuries and provide a nexus for US Department of Safe Streets and roadway safety. Eligible commercially available Transportation (USDOT) Roads for All technology examples include, but are not limited to: Office of the Secretary (SS4A) - Intelligent transportation systems - Vehicle -to -Infrastructure (V2X) communications - Adaptive signal timing - Variable speed limits Projects that demonstrate at least 1 technology area: - Coordinated Automation US Department of Strengthening - Connected Vehicles Transportation (USDOT) Mobility and - Intelligent, Sensor -Based Infrastructure Office of the Assistant Revolutionizing - Systems Integration Secretary for Research Transportation - Commerce Delivery and Logistics and Technology (OST-R) (SMART) - Innovative Aviation Technology - Smart Grid - Smart Technology Traffic Signals Advanced transportation & congestion management technologies including: - Emergency evacuation and response technologies - Integrated corridor management systems - Advanced parking reservation or variable pricing systems Advanced - Electronic pricing, toll collection, and payment Federal Highway Transportation Technologies and systems - High occupancy vehicle toll lanes, cordon pricing, Administration (FHWA) pricing and congestion g p g (ATTAIN) - Advanced mobility access and on -demand transportation service technologies including dynamic ridesharing, shared -use mobility applications, and human services information systems for elderly and disabled individuals - Retrofitting DSRC technology to C-V2X - Advanced transportation technologies r�lmk1 »�I►1�]EIe1 EXISTING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE SCHEMATIC a� The Heart of Southem California Wine Countrq Existing System Architecture Schematic 3 N fn I U a) s U Q L_ O 3 a z 0 U a) J / 0 0 Q U rn c �L (D a) c rn C wI M O i N N U >, M c 0 0 U_ C E E O U U a O a� i.� I rn O N N 1-1 7 U a) E a� U a) O i 0 0 0 U H N s a� `o s E (n Ln ao N N O N O T O a) a E O J N 7 m 41 O RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & JEFFERSON AVE IIT SERVER ROOM JEFFERSON AVE & SANBORN AVE TS CABINET ES WINCHESTER RD & JEFFERSON AVE COMM CABINET IC I ES I TO RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & JEFFERSON AVE TS CABINET JEFFERSON AVE & OVERLAND DR COMM COCABINET F ES I RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & VINCENT MORAGA DR / DIAZ RD SPLICE CABINET * ROUTED THROUGH MC F DATE ST & MARGARITA RD & — MARGARITA RD & MARGARITA RD & — DATE ST & YNEZ RD DATE ST & DATE ST & WINCO DWY HARVESTON WAY DATE ST KINGWOOD RD TSw:::;- WAVERLY LN EQUITY DR TS CABINET — MARGARITA RD & TS CABINET — DATE ST & TS CABINET TS CABINET RUSTIC GLEN DR / LAKEVIEW RD / SM HARVESTON SCHOOL RD SM BLACKSTONE RD CFMC ES ES •00 •ee- WINCHESTER RD WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER RD & & DIAZ RD ENTERPRISE CIR JEFFERSON AVE YNEZ RD YNEZ RD PROMENADE MALL W PROMENADE MALL E MARGARITA RD MARGARITA RD TS CABINET iT 7ABINET TS CABINET COMM CABINET ITS CESINETI ITS 7ABINET TS CESINETI COMM CABINET TS CEBINET ES ES ` RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & VINCENT MORAGA DR / DIAZ RD TS CABINET ES RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & BUSINESS PARK DR / RIDGE PARK DR TS CABINET ES FIELD OPERATIONS CENTER L� ICl I I I IC I ES I YNEZ RD & RING RD & RING RD & OVERLAND DR PROMENADE MALL N PROMENADE MALL W COMM CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET ES ES IC I ES I RANCHO WAY & DIAZ RD COMM CABINET ES RANCHO WAY & DIAZ RD TS CABINET ES RING RD & PROMENADE MALL E TS CABINET ES — RANCHO RANCHO RANCHO RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO CALIFORNIA RANCHO CALIFORNIA RANCHO CALIFORNIA & HOPE WAY / & VIA LAS CALIFORNIA RD CALIFORNIA RD RENDEVOUZ RD / & COSMIC DR / RD & JEFFERSON AVE RD & YNEZ RD RD & YNEZ RD TOWN CENTER COLINAS & LYNDIE RD & MORAGA RD PORTOFINO HUMBER DR �TS CABINET COMM CABINET TS CABINET' TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET ITS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET ES �� ES ES ES ES ES ES ES TO WINCHESTER RD/ YNEZ RD & NICOLAS RD TS CABINET TIERRA VISTA RD TS CABINET SM 6TH ST PARKING LOT PUBLIC RESTROOMS — YNEZ RD & RANCHO VISTA RD — YNEZ RD & PAUBA RD OLD TOWN FRONT YNEZ RD & ST & 1ST ST - SANTIAGO RD SANTIAGO RD TS CABINET SM TEMECULA PKWY & TEMECULA PKWY BEDFORD CT & LA PAZ RD COMM CABINET ITS CABINET ES ES ROUTED THROUGH: - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & YNEZ RD IC - TEMECULA PKWY & PECHANGA PKWY IC ROUTED THROUGH RANCHO* CALIFORNIA RD & YNEZ RD ICI TEMECULA PKWY & TEMECULA PKWY & RANCHO PUEBLA / TEMECULA PKWY TEMECULA PKWY TEMECULA PKWY TEMECULA PKWY & RANCHO COMMUNITY AVENIDA DE & WABASH LN & PECHANGA PKWY & PECHANGA PKWY JEDEDIAH SMITH RD CENTER MISIONES TS CABINET COMM CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET ES ES ES ES ES IC I ES I WINCHESTER RD & RORIPAUGH RD TS CABINET ES I MARGARITA RD & N GENERAL KEARNY RD TS CABINET ES YNEZ RD & — YNEZ RD & TOWN CENTER S - TOWN CENTER N - YNEZ RD & TOWER PLAZA S TOWER PLAZA N OVERLAND DR — YNEZ RD & DLR DR TS CABINET - YNEZ RD &YNEZ CT TS CABINET - SM YNEZ RD & MOTOR CAR PKWY SM RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & YUKON RD / ASTEROID WAY TS CABINET IC I ES I TEMECULA PKWY & TEMECULA PKWY & COUNTRY GLEN WAY MARGARITA RD TS CABINET TS CABINET ES aj RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & MARGARITA RD TS CABINET CFMC - IC I ES I MARGARITA RD & YUKON RD HONORS DR ITS CABINET WINCHESTER RD & NICOLAS RD COMM CABINET IC I ES I OVERLAND DR & PROMENADEWAY - NICOLE LN TS CABINET SM MARGARITA RD & LA SERENA WAY TS CABINET SM WINCHESTER RD & NICOLAS RD TS CABINET CFMC ES WINCHESTER RD & WINCHESTER CREEK AVE - WILLOWS AVE TS CABINET SM NICOLAS RD RORIPAUGH RD TS CABINET L SM NICOLAS RD N GENERAL KEARNY RD TS CABINET SM OVERLAND DR & MARGARITA RD & MARGARITA RD & MARGARITA RD SOLANA RIDGE SOLANA WAY TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET SM SM SM MARGARITA RD & AVENIDA BARCA TS CABINET SM MARGARITA RD & STONEWOOD RD TS CABINET SM MARGARITA RD & MORAGA RD TS nCABINET RANCHO BUTTERFIELD BUTTERFIELD CALIFORNIA RD RANCHO RANCHO CALIFORNIA STAGE RD & BUTTERFIELD BUTTERFIELD BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD & & MEADOWS CALIFORNIA RD RD & BUTTERFIELD AVENIDA STAGE RD & STAGE RD & STAGE RD & MURRIETA PKWY & TEE DR STAGE RD LESTONNAC LA SERENA WAY CALLE CHAPOS NICOLAS RD HOT SPRINGS RD TS CABINET CABINET TS CEBINET TS CEBINET CABINET TS CEBINET 1777ABINET TS CABINET ES ITS F ESI ITS MARGARITA RD & RANCHO VISTA RD TS CABINET ES TEMECULA PKWY & TEMECULA PKWY MEADOWS & CAMINO DEL SOL PKWY/ APIS RD T r7E7 TSCABINET ES MARGARITA RD & PAUBA RD TS CABINET i M _ RONALD H. ROBERTS * TO TMC ROUTED THROUGH: TEMECULA PUBLIC LIBRARY - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & JEFFERSON AVE MC (30600 PAUBA RD) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & YNEZ RD IC - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD & YUKON RD IC - RACNHO CALIFORNIA RD & MARGARITA RD IC MARGARITA RD & SANTIAGO RD i TS CABINET MARGARITA RD & DE PORTOLA RD TS CABINET ES MARGARITA RD & DARTOLO RD TS CABINET ES TEMECULA PKWY & BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD TEMECULA PKWY & MEADOWS PKWY & MAHLON VAIL RD TS CABINET — BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD & DE PORTOLA RD TS CABINET CFMC DE PORTOLA RD TS CABINET BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD & ES ES PAUBA RD SM MEADOWS PKWY & PAUBA RD ES - - LEGEND: JEFFERSON AVE & VIA JEFFERSON AVE & JEFFERSON AVE& MONTEZUMA OVERLAND DR SANBORN AVEBUTTERFIELD CFMC CITY FACILITY TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET STAGE RD & TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET ES ES ES NIGHTHAWK PASS PECHANGA PKWY & DEER HOLLOW WAY & DEER HOLLOW WAY & 1TS CABINET COMMUNICATIONS CABINET PECHANGA PKWY & WOLF VALLEY RD PECHANGA PKWY & VIA LA COLORADA - PEPPERCORN DR - RAINBOW VALLEY BLVD - VIA EDUARDO - PECHANGA PKWY & N CASINO DR DEER HOLLOW WAY PEACH TREE ST JON WILLIAM WAY SM SPLICE CABINET -PECHANGA PKWY &CASINO DR ITS CABINET - PECHANGA PKWY & MUIRFIELD DR ITS CABINET - PECHANGA PKWY & TS CABINET TS CABINET ITS CABINET COMMUNICATION CABINET W/ CROSS —CONNECT SM — PECHANGA PKWY & LOMA LINDA RD SM PECHANGA RESORT DR SM SM SM PECHANGA PKWY & — PECHANGA PKWY & ES ETHERNET SWITCH VIA CONSUELO - WOLF CREEK DR N GREAT OAK DR - WOLF CREEK DR S CFMC COPPER FIBER MEDIA CONVERTER WOLF VALLEY RD & SM I SERIAL MODEM WOLF CREEK DR N - WOLF CREEK DR S FMCl MAIN CROSS -CONNECT ITS CABINET I C INTERMEDIATE CROSS -CONNECT SM FIBER OPTIC MEDIA COPPER WIRE INTERCONNECT TS TRAFFIC SIGNAL • • CONTINUING MEDIA SOMMERS BEND SPORTS PARK DE PORTOLA RD & MEADOWS PKWY & CAMPANULA WAY & CAMPANULA WAY CAMPANULA WAY CAMINO DEL SOL TS CABINET TS CABINET TS CABINET SM SM SM w COMMUNICATION SYSTEM DEFICIENCY IDENTIFICAITON - TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIST c7mmm� The keart of Southern California Wine Country Traffic Signal System ID Name Communication System Deficiency 1 Butterfield Stage Rd & Murrieta Hot Springs Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 2 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nicolas Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 3 Butterfield Stage Rd & Calle Chapos None - Existing Fiber Media 4 Butterfield Stage Rd & La Serena Way None - Existing Fiber Media 5 Butterfield Stage Rd & Rancho California Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 6 Butterfield Stage Rd & Pauba Rd Obsolete Equipment 7 Butterfield Stage Rd & Royal Crest PI/Rothenberg Dr Obsolete Equipment 8 Butterfield Stage Rd & Crowne Hill Dr Obsolete Equipment 9 Butterfield Stage Rd & De Portola Rd Obsolete Equipment 10 Butterfield Stage Rd & Temecula Pkwy None - Existing Fiber Media 11 Butterfield Stage Rd & Wolf Store Rd Obsolete Equipment 12 Butterfield Stage Rd & Welton Way/Channel St Obsolete Equipment 13 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nighthawk Pass Obsolete Equipment 14 Campanula Way & Camino Del Sol Obsolete Equipment 15 Campanula Way E & De Portola Rd Obsolete Equipment 16 Date Street & Lakeview Road Obsolete Equipment 17 Date & Kingwood Obsolete Equipment 18 Deer Hollow Way & Peach Tree/Via La Coloarada Obsolete Equipment 19 Deer Hollow Way & Peppercorn Dr Obsolete Equipment 21 Diaz Rd & Rancho Way Communication System Gap 22 Jefferson Ave & Sanborn Ave Communication System Gap 23 Jefferson Ave & Overland Dr Communication System Gap 24 Jefferson Ave & Via Montezuma Communication System Gap 25 Jefferson Ave & Del Rio Communication System Gap 26 Margarita Rd & Date St Obsolete Equipment 27 Margarita Rd & Rustic Glen Dr/Harveston School Rd Obsolete Equipment 28 Margarita Rd & Harveston Way Obsolete Equipment 29 Margarita Rd & Winco-Ralphs Dwy Obsolete Equipment 30 Margarita Rd & Verdes Ln Communication System Gap 31 Margarita Rd & N.General Kearny Rd Communication System Gap 32 Margarita Rd & Overland Dr Obsolete Equipment 33 Margarita Rd & Abbott Vascular/Solana Ridge Obsolete Equipment 34 Margarita Rd & Solana Way Obsolete Equipment 35 Margarita Rd & Stonewood Rd Obsolete Equipment 36 Margarita Rd. & Moraga Rd. Obsolete Equipment 37 Margarita Rd & Avenida Barca Obsolete Equipment 38 Margarita Rd & La Serena Way Obsolete Equipment 39 Margarita Rd & Yukon Rd/Honors Dr Obsolete Equipment 40 Margarita Rd & Rancho Vista Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 41 Margarita Rd & Pauba Rd Communication System Gap 42 Margarita Rd & Santiago Rd Communication System Gap 43 Margarita Rd & Pio Pico Rd Communication System Gap 44 Margarita Rd & De Portola Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 45 Margarita Rd & Dartolo Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 46 Meadows Pkwy & La Serena Way Communication System Gap 47 Meadows Pkwy & Rancho Vista Rd Communication System Gap 48 lMeaclows Pkwy & Pauba Rd Obsolete Equipment Traffic Signal System ID Name Communication System Deficiency 49 Meadows Pkwy & McCabe Dr/Sunny Meadows Dr Obsolete Equipment 50 Meadows Pkwy & Leena Way Obsolete Equipment 51 Meadows Pkwy & De Portola Rd Obsolete Equipment 52 Meadows Pkwy & Campanula Way Obsolete Equipment 53 Nicolas Rd & Rancho Temecula Town Center Obsolete Equipment 54 Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd Obsolete Equipment 55 Nighthawk Pass & Vail Ranch /Redhawk Obsolete Equipment 56 North General Kearny Rd & Camino Campos Verdes Communication System Gap 57 Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St None - Existing Fiber Media 59 Overland Dr & Promenade Way/Nicole Ln Obsolete Equipment 60 Pauba Rd & Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 Communication System Gap 61 Pauba Rd & Via Rami/Linfield Way Communication System Gap 62 Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy None - Existing Fiber Media 63 Pechanga Pkwy & Rainbow Canyon Rd Communication System Gap 64 Pechanga Pkwy & Muirfield Dr Communication System Gap 65 Pechanga Pkwy & Loma Linda Rd Communication System Gap 66 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr N Communication System Gap 67 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd/Via Eduardo Communication System Gap 68 Pechanga Pkwy & Casino Dr North Communication System Gap 69 Pechanga Pkwy & Casino Dr South Communication System Gap 70 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Resort Dr Communication System Gap 71 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr S/Great Oak Dr Communication System Gap 72 Pechanga Pkwy & Deer Hollow Way Communication System Gap 73 Rancho California Rd & Business Park Dr W/Ridge Park Dr None - Existing Fiber Media 74 Rancho California Rd & Diaz Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 75 Rancho California Rd & Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front None - Existing Fiber Media 76 Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 77 Rancho California Rd & Town Center Dr/Hope Wy None - Existing Fiber Media 78 Rancho California Rd & Via Las Colinas None - Existing Fiber Media 79 Rancho California Rd & Lyndie Ln None - Existing Fiber Media 80 Rancho California Rd & Moraga Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 81 Rancho California Road & Portofino/Rendezvous Drive None - Existing Fiber Media 82 Rancho California Rd & Cosmic Dr/Humber Dr None - Existing Fiber Media 83 Rancho California Rd & Yukon Rd/Asteroid Way None - Existing Fiber Media 84 Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 85 Rancho California & Tee Dr None - Existing Fiber Media 86 Rancho California Rd & Meadows Pkwy None - Existing Fiber Media 87 Rancho Vista Rd & Mira Loma Dr Communication System Gap 88 Redhawk Pkwy & Via Rio Temecula/Wolf Store Rd Obsolete Equipment 89 Redhawk Pkwy & Overland Tr/Paseo Parallon Obsolete Equipment 90 Redhawk Pkwy & Vail Ranch Pkwy Obsolete Equipment 91 Redhawk Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd Communication System Gap 92 Redhawk Pkwy & Peppercorn Dr Communication System Gap 93 Redhawk Pkwy & El Chimisal Rd/Tehachapi Pass Communication System Gap 94 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall W. (Winchester) Communication System Gap 95 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall N. (Ynez) Communication System Gap 96 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall S. (Ynez) Communication System Gap 97 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall E None - Existing Fiber Media Traffic Signal System ID Name Communication System Deficiency 98 Temecula Pkwy & La Paz St None - Existing Fiber Media 99 Temecula Pkwy & Wabash Ln None - Existing Fiber Media 100 Temecula Pkwy & Jedediah Smith Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 101 Temecula Pkwy & Kevin PI/Rancho Community None - Existing Fiber Media 102 Temecula Pkwy & Ave. De Missiones/Rancho Pueblo Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 103 Temecula Pkwy & Country Glen Way None - Existing Fiber Media 104 Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy None - Existing Fiber Media 105 Temecula Pkwy & Camino Del Sol None - Existing Fiber Media 106 Temecula Pkwy & Meadows Pkwy/Apis Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 107 Temecula Pkwy & Mahlon Vail Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 108 Winchester Rd & Diaz Rd. None - Existing Fiber Media 109 Winchester Rd & Enterprise Circle None - Existing Fiber Media 110 Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave None - Existing Fiber Media 111 Winchester Rd & Promenade Mall W. None - Existing Fiber Media 112 Winchester Rd & Promenade Mall E./Margarita Meadows None - Existing Fiber Media 113 Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 114 Winchester Rd & Roripaugh Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 115 Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 116 Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek Dr N/S Obsolete Equipment 117 Ynez Rd & Waverly Ln/Temecula Center Dr Communication System Gap 118 Ynez Rd & Date St Communication System Gap 119 Ynez Rd & Equity Dr Communication System Gap 120 Ynez Rd & County Center Dr Communication System Gap 121 Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd None - Existing Fiber Media 122 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza N Obsolete Equipment 123 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza S Obsolete Equipment 124 Ynez Rd & Overland Drive Obsolete Equipment 125 Ynez Rd & Motor Car Pkwy Obsolete Equipment 126 Ynez Rd & Solana Way Obsolete Equipment 127 Ynez Rd & DLR Dr/Ynez Ct Obsolete Equipment 128 Ynez Rd & Town Center/Tower Plaza N Obsolete Equipment 129 Ynez Rd & Town Center/Tower Plaza S Obsolete Equipment 130 Ynez Rd & Tierra Vista Road Obsolete Equipment 131 Ynez Rd & Rancho Vista Rd Obsolete Equipment 132 Ynez Rd & Pauba Road Obsolete Equipment 133 Ynez Rd & Santiago Road Obsolete Equipment 134 Butterfield Stage Rd & Lestonnac None - Existing Fiber Media APPENDIX C TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM NETWORK BANDWIDTH CALCULATIONS a� C7' The Heart of Southern California Vvine Country Traffic Signal Aggregated Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Intersection Sub Group Demand Network Intersection Sub Group Network Group Demand System ID Demand (Mbps) (Mbps) Group (Mbps) IP ) 1 21 Diaz Rd & Rancho Way 24.54 1-T1 1 73 Rancho California Rd & Business Park Dr W/Ridge Park Dr 24.54 1-Tl 1 74 Rancho California Rd & Diaz Rd 24.54 1-T1 1 108 Winchester Rd & Diaz Rd. 24.54 1-Tl 171.78 1 109 Winchester Rd & Enterprise Circle 24.54 1-Ti 1 110 Winchester Rd & Jefferson Ave 24.54 1-T1 1 22 Jefferson Ave & Sanborn Ave 24.54 1-T1-Bl 368.1 1 23 Jefferson Ave & Overland Dr 24.54 1-T2 1 24 Jefferson Ave & Via Montezuma 24.54 1-T2 98.16 1 25 Jefferson Ave & Del Rio 24.54 1-T2 1 75 Rancho California Rd & Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front 24.54 1-T2 1 - Reserved 24.54 1-F-T3 1 - Reserved 24.54 1-F-T3 98.16 1 - Reserved 24.54 1-F-T3 1 - Reserved 24.54 1-F-T3 2 16 Date Street & Lakeview Road 24.54 2-T1 2 17 Date & Kingwood 24.54 2-T1 2 26 Margarita Rd & Date St 24.54 2-T1 2 27 Margarita Rd & Rustic Glen Dr/Harveston School Rd 24.54 2-Tl 2 28 Margarita Rd & Harveston Way 24.54 2-T1 2 29 Margarita Rd & Winco-Ralphs Dwy 24.54 2-T1 245.4 245.4 2 118 Ynez Rd & Date St 24.54 2-T1 2 119 Ynez Rd & Equity Dr 24.54 2-T1 2 120 Ynez Rd & County Center Dr 24.54 2-T1 2 117 Ynez Rd & Waverly Ln/Temecula Center Dr 24.54 2-T1-B1 3 121 Ynez Rd & Winchester Rd 24.54 3-Tl 3 122 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza N 24.54 3-T1 73.62 3 123 Ynez Rd & Promenade Mall/Palm Plaza S 24.54 3-T1 3 111 Winchester Rd & Promenade Mall W. 24.54 3-T2 3 112 Winchester Rd & Promenade Mall E./Margarita Meadows 24.54 3-T2 49.08 3 113 Winchester Rd & Margarita Rd 24.54 3-T3 3 114 Winchester Rd & Roripaugh Rd 24.54 3-T3 49.08 3 53 Nicolas Rd & Rancho Temecula Town Center 24.54 3-T4 392.64 3 54 Nicolas Rd & North General Kearny Rd 24.54 3-T4 73.62 3 115 Winchester Rd & Nicolas Rd 24.54 3-T4 3 94 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall W. (Winchester) 24.54 3-T5 3 95 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall N. (Ynez) 24.54 3-T5 3 96 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall S. (Ynez) 24.54 3-T5 98.16 3 97 Ring Rd & Promenade Mall E 24.54 3-T5 3 - Reserved 24.54 3-F-T6 3 - Reserved 24.54 3-F-T6 49.08 4 124 Ynez Rd & Overland Drive 24.54 4-T1 4 125 Ynez Rd & Motor Car Pkwy 24.54 4-T1 4 126 Ynez Rd & Solana Way 24.54 4-Tl 4 127 Ynez Rd & DLR Dr/Ynez Ct 24.54 4-T1 147.24 147.24 4 128 Ynez Rd & Town Center/Tower Plaza N 24.54 4-T1 4 129 Ynez Rd & Town Center/Tower Plaza S 24.54 4-T1 5 30 Margarita Rd & Verdes Ln 24.54 5-T1 5 31 Margarita Rd & N.General Kearny Rd 24.54 5-T1 5 32 Margarita Rd & Overland Dr 24.54 5-T1 5 33 Margarita Rd & Abbott Vascular/Solana Ridge 24.54 5-Ti 5 34 Margarita Rd & Solana Way 24.54 5-T1 5 35 Margarita Rd & Stonewood Rd 24.54 5-T1 5 36 Margarita Rd. & Moraga Rd. 24.54 5-T1 294.48 294.48 5 37 Margarita Rd & Avenida Barca 24.54 5-T1 5 38 Margarita Rd & La Serena Way 24.54 5-T1 5 39 Margarita Rd & Yukon Rd/Honors Dr 24.54 5-T1 5 56 North General Kearny Rd & Camino Campos Verdes 24.54 5-Tl-B1 5 59 Overland Dr & Promenade Way/Nicole Ln 24.54 5-T1-B2 C-1 Traffic Signal Aggregated Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Intersection Sub Group Demand Network Intersection Sub Group Network Group Demand System ID Demand (Mbps) (Mbps) Group (Mbps) IP ) 6 2 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nicolas Rd 24.54 6-T1 6 3 Butterfield Stage Rd & Calle Chapos 24.54 6-T1 6 4 Butterfield Stage Rd & La Serena Way 24.54 6-T1 122.7 6 1 Butterfield Stage Rd & Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 24.54 6-T1-B1 6 46 Meadows Pkwy & La Serena Way 24.54 6-T1-B1 220.86 6 - Reserved 24.54 6-F-T2 6 - Reserved 24.54 6-F-T2 98.16 6 - Reserved 24.54 6-F-T2 6 - Reserved 24.54 6-F-T2 7 5 Butterfield Stage Rd & Rancho California Rd 24.54 7-T1 7 76 Rancho California Rd & Ynez Rd 24.54 7-T1 7 77 Rancho California Rd & Town Center Dr/Hope Wy 24.54 7-T1 7 78 Rancho California Rd & Via Las Colinas 24.54 7-T1 7 79 Rancho California Rd & Lyndie Ln 24.54 7-T1 7 80 Rancho California Rd & Moraga Rd 24.54 7-T1 7 81 Rancho California Road & Portofino/Rendezvous Drive 24.54 7-T1 319.02 7 82 Rancho California Rd & Cosmic Dr/Humber Dr 24.54 7-T1 368.1 7 83 Rancho California Rd & Yukon Rd/Asteroid Way 24.54 7-T1 7 84 Rancho California Rd & Margarita Rd 24.54 7-T1 7 85 Rancho California & Tee Dr 24.54 7-T1 7 86 Rancho California Rd & Meadows Pkwy 24.54 7-T1 7 47 Meadows Pkwy & Rancho Vista Rd 24.54 7-T1-B1 7 - Reserved 24.54 7-F-T2 49.08 7 - Reserved 24.54 7-F-T2 8 57 Old Town Front St & Santiago Rd/First St 24.54 8-T1 8 130 Ynez Rd & Tierra Vista Road 24.54 8-T2 8 131 Ynez Rd & Rancho Vista Rd 24.54 8-T2 147.24 8 132 Ynez Rd & Pauba Road 24.54 8-T2 8 133 Ynez Rd & Santiago Road 24.54 8-T2 8 87 Rancho Vista Rd & Mira Loma Dr 24.54 8-T2-B1 294.48 8 98 Temecula Pkwy & La Paz St 24.54 8-T3 8 99 Temecula Pkwy & Wabash Ln 24.54 8-T3 49.08 8 - Reserved 24.54 8-F-T4 8 - Reserved 24.54 8-F-T4 98.16 8 - Reserved 24.54 8-F-T4 8 - Reserved 24.54 8-F-T4 9 40 Margarita Rd & Rancho Vista Rd 24.54 9-T1 9 41 Margarita Rd & Pauba Rd 24.54 9-T1 9 42 Margarita Rd & Santiago Rd 24.54 9-T1 9 43 Margarita Rd & Pio Pico Rd 24.54 9-T1 9 44 Margarita Rd & De Portola Rd 24.54 9-T1 196.32 9 45 Margarita Rd & Dartolo Rd 24.54 9-T1 245.4 9 60 Pauba Rd & Calle Ventura/Fire Station 84 24.54 9-T1-B1 9 61 Pauba Rd & Via Rami/Linfield Way 24.54 9-T1-B2 9 - Reserved 24.54 9-F-T2 49.08 9 - Reserved 24.54 9-F-T3 10 62 Pechanga Pkwy & Temecula Pkwy 24.54 10-T1 10 100 Temecula Pkwy & Jedediah Smith Rd 24.54 10-T1 10 101 Temecula Pkwy & Kevin PI/Rancho Community 24.54 10-T1 10 102 Temecula Pkwy & Ave. De Missiones/Rancho Pueblo Rd 24.54 10-T1 147.24 171.78 10 103 Temecula Pkwy & Country Glen Way 24.54 10-T1 10 104 Temecula Pkwy & Margarita Rd/Redhawk Pkwy 24.54 10-T1 10 - Reserved 24.54 10-F-T2 24.54 C-2 Traffic Signal Aggregated Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Intersection Sub Group Demand Network Intersection Sub Group Network Group Demand System ID Demand (Mbps) (Mbps) Group (Mbps) 11 6 Butterfield Stage Rd & Pauba Rd 24.54 11-T1 11 7 Butterfield Stage Rd & Royal Crest PI/Rothenberg Dr 24.54 11-T1 11 8 Butterfield Stage Rd & Crowne Hill Dr 24.54 11-T1 11 9 Butterfield Stage Rd & De Portola Rd 24.54 11-Tl 147.24 11 10 Butterfield Stage Rd & Temecula Pkwy 24.54 11-Tl 11 209 Butterfield Stage Rd & Lestonnac 24.54 11-Tl 11 48 Meadows Pkwy & Pauba Rd 24.54 11-T2 11 49 Meadows Pkwy & McCabe Dr/Sunny Meadows Dr 24.54 11-T2 11 50 Meadows Pkwy & Leena Way 24.54 11-T2 11 51 Meadows Pkwy & De Portola Rd 24.54 11-T2 171.78 441.72 11 52 Meadows Pkwy & Campanula Way 24.54 11-T2 11 14 Campanula Way & Camino Del Sol 24.54 11-T2-Bl 11 15 Campanula Way E & De Portola Rd 24.54 11-T2-82 11 105 Temecula Pkwy & Camino Del Sol 24.54 11-T3 11 106 Temecula Pkwy & Meadows Pkwy/Apis Rd 24.54 11-T3 73.62 11 107 Temecula Pkwy & Mahlon Vail Rd 24.54 11-T3 11 - Reserved 24.54 11-F-T4 49.08 11 F4 Reserved 24.54 11-F-T4 12 18 Deer Hollow Way & Peach Tree/Via La Coloarada 24.54 12-T1 12 19 Deer Hollow Way & Peppercorn Dr 24.54 12-T1 49.08 12 63 Pechanga Pkwy & Rainbow Canyon Rd 24.54 12-T2 12 64 Pechanga Pkwy & Muirfield Dr 24.54 12-T2 12 65 Pechanga Pkwy & Loma Linda Rd 24.54 12-T2 12 66 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr N 24.54 12-T2 12 67 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd/Via Eduardo 24.54 12-T2 12 68 Pechanga Pkwy & Casino Dr North 24.54 12-T2 269.94 343.56 12 69 Pechanga Pkwy & Casino Dr South 24.54 12-T2 12 70 Pechanga Pkwy & Pechanga Resort Dr 24.54 12-T2 12 71 Pechanga Pkwy & Wolf Creek Dr S/Great Oak Dr 24.54 12-T2 12 72 Pechanga Pkwy & Deer Hollow Way 24.54 12-T2 12 116 Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek Dr N/S 24.54 12-T2-B1 12 - Reserved 24.54 12-F-T3 24.54 13 11 Butterfield Stage Rd & Wolf Store Rd 24.54 13-T1 13 12 Butterfield Stage Rd & Welton Way/Channel St 24.54 13-Tl 73.62 13 13 Butterfield Stage Rd & Nighthawk Pass 24.54 13-Tl 13 55 Nighthawk Pass & Vail Ranch /Redhawk 24.54 13-T2 13 93 Redhawk Pkwy & El Chimisal Rd/Tehachapi Pass 24.54 13-T2 49.08 13 88 Redhawk Pkwy & Via Rio Temecula/Wolf Store Rd 24.54 13-T3 13 89 Redhawk Pkwy & Overland Tr/Paseo Parallon 24.54 13-T3 13 90 Redhawk Pkwy & Vail Ranch Pkwy 24.54 13-T3 122.7 343.56 13 91 Redhawk Pkwy & Wolf Valley Rd 24.54 13-T3 13 92 Redhawk Pkwy & Peppercorn Dr 24.54 13-T3 13 - Reserved 24.54 13-F-T4 13 - Reserved 24.54 13-F-T4 98.16 13 - Reserved 24.54 13-F-T4 13 - Reserved 24.54 13-F-T4 C-3 - I LT up r�lmk A 2 1 A ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATES a� pp, The Heart of Southem California Wine Country Item: Description PHASE 1 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Communication Hub Item # Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Furnish & Install 41-1 FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination 6 EA $15,000 $90,000 2 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 6 EA $5,000 $30,000 3 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $140,000 Soft Costs (30%): $42,000 Construction Contingency (30%): $42,000 Grand Total: 1 $224,000 Item: Description Fiber Breakout Cables and Communication Equipment at Traffic Siqnal Cabinets DescriptionItem # Item 1 Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch 25 EA $8,500 $212,500 2 Furnish & Install 11-1 FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination. 25 EA $3,500 $87,500 3 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 5,000 LF $5 $25,000 4 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $340,000 Soft Costs (309Q: $102,000 Construction Contingency (30%):1 $102,000 Grand Total: $544,000 Item: Description: Installation of New Fiber Optic Infrastructure at Locations with Existing Copper Wire Interconnect and Communication Conduit Upgrades Item # Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch 29 EA $8,500 $246,500 2 Furnish & Install 1U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination. 29 EA $3,500 $101,500 3 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 32,000 LF $6 $192,000 4 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 33,000 LF $5 $165,000 5 Furnish & Install 72-strand SMFOC 6,000 LF $5 $30,000 6 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 6,500 LF $5 $32,500 7 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 29 EA $5,000 $145,000 8 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 29 EA $13,000 $377,000 9 Remove & Salvage Existing Pull Box. Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 57 EA $5,000 $285,000 10 IRS Existing Pull Box and Connect Existing Conduit with New Continous Conduit 57 EA $5,000 $285,000 11 1 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Sub Total: $1,889,500 Soft Costs (30%): $566,850 Construction Contingency (30%): $566,850 Grand Total: $3,023,200 D-1 Item: 4 Description: Wireless Communication Upgrades at Remote Locations Item # Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Furnish & Install Wireless Radio 3 EA $8,000 $24,000 2 Furnish & Install Repeater 2 EA $10,000 $20,000 3 Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch 2 EA $8,500 $17,000 4 Wireless Testing and Documentation 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Sub Total: $66,000 Soft Costs (30%): $19,800 Construction Contingency (30%): $19,800 Grand Total: I $105,600 Phase 1 Grand Total: 1 $3,896,800 M PHASE 2 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Item: 5 Description: Fiber Optic Infrastructure Upgrades at Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway, and Winchester Road " Quantity 1 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 73,000 LF $6.50 $474,500 2 Furnish & Install 72-strand SMFOC 2,000 LF $5.40 $10,800 3 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 36 EA $14,000 $504,000 4 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 36 EA $5,400 $194,400 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 Sub Total: $1,213,700 Soft Costs (30%): $364,110 Construction Contingency (30%): $364,110 Grand Total: $1,941,920 Item: 6 Description: Communication Hub Upgrades Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 1 Furnish & Install 4U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination 2 EA $16,000 $32,000 2 Furnish & Install New Communication Hub 3 EA $50,000 $150,000 3 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $202,000 Soft Costs (30%): $60,600 Construction Contingency (30%)- $60,600 Grand Total- $323,200 Item: 7 Description: Fiber Optic Infrastructure to ITSS Facilities Item # 1 Item Description Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit Quantitjl�� 8,000 LF Unit Price $70 Amount $560,000 2 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 8,500 LF $5.40 $45,900 3 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 14 EA $5,400 $75,600 4 Fiber Termination at City Facility & Equipment 5 EA $25,000 $125,000 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $821,500 Soft Costs (30%): $246,450 Construction Contingency (30%): $246,450 Grand Total: $1,314,400 Phase 2 Grand Total: 1 $3,579,520 D-3 PHASE 3 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Item: 8 Description: Fiber Optic Cable and Communication Conduit Upgrades Item Description Price Amount .UML- 1 -aMAWA�jUnit Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 50,000 LF $6.90 $345,000 2 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 5,000 LF $5.70 $28,500 3 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 14 EA $14,900 $208,600 4 Furnish & Install Splice Closure 14 EA $5,700 $79,800 5 Remove & Salvage Existing Pull Box. Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 70 EA $5,700 $399,000 6 RS Existing Pull Box and Connect Existing Conduit with New Continous Conduit 70 EA $5,700 $399,000 7 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $1,479,900 Soft Costs (30%): $443,970 Construction Contingency (30%): $443,970 Grand Total: $2,367,840 Item: 9 Description: New Fiber Optic Cable and Conduit along Gaps # Item Description QuantityItem 1 Furnish & Install Ethernet Switch 13 EA $9,700 $126,100 2 Furnish & Install 1U FDU, Splice Cassette, and Cabinet Termination. 13 EA $4,000 $52,000 3 Furnish & Install 288-strand SMFOC 44,000 LF $6.90 $303,600 4 Furnish & Install 144-strand SMFOC 16,000 LF $5.70 $91,200 5 Furnish & Install 72-strand SMFOC 17,500 LF $5.70 $99,750 6 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 2,500 LF $5.70 $14,250 7 Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit 70,000 LF $80 $5,600,000 8 Furnish & Install Communication Vault 13 EA $14,900 $193,700 9 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 100 EA $5,700 $570,000 10 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $7,070,600 Soft Costs (30%): $2,121,180 Construction Contingency (30%): $2,121,180 Grand Total: $11,312,960 Item: 10 Description: New Communication Hubs Item # Item DescripQuantity 1 lFurnish & Install New Communication Hub 2 EA $57,000 $114,000 2 1 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Sub Total: $129,000 Soft Costs (30%): $38,700 Construction Contingency (30%): $38,700 Grand Total: $206,400 D-4 PHASE 3 ORDER OF MAGNITUDE COST ESTIMATE Item: Description: Fiber Optic Infrastructure to ITSS Facilities 1 Furnish & Install 3" PVC Conduit 3,500 LF $80 $280,000 2 Furnish & Install 12-strand SMFO Breakout Cable 3,200 LF $5.70 $18,240 3 Furnish & Install No. 6 Pull Box & 45-degree Conduit Sweeps 6 EA $5,700 $34,200 4 Fiber Termination at City Facility & Equipment 3 EA $28,500 $85,500 5 Fiber Testing & Documentation 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Sub Total: $437,940 Soft Costs (30%): $131,382 Construction Contingency (30%): $131,382 Grand Total: $700,704 Phase 3 Grand Total: $14,587,904 D-5 Item No. 4 a CITY OF TEMECULA F1RF �f _ a_ y. FIRE DEPARTMENT �— rG Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management MONTHLY REPORT APRIL 2024 ..n\4l\bft 1.... 5 Stations 7 Engines I USAR 2 Truck I I Squad Population - 112,194 ;;; leo ISM Rai APRIL CALL BREAKDOWN .:.,; APRIL 2024 Other False Alarm TYPE: # TYPE: -, # COMMERCIAL FIRE I TRAFFIC COLLISION 77 Fires r _ MULTI -FAMILY FIRE 0 MEDICAL EMERGENCY 5E7 TC - 2024 Year t - ale . RESIDENTIAL FIRE 0- OTHER MISCELLANEOUS 15 PUBLIC ASSIST 32�^ �� - Its ° r� WILDLAND FIRE =_ f STANDBY 5 i"� VEHICLE FIRE Y( _4 Medical Emergencies OTHER FIRE-- TOTAL: 6968 0 a :.r= RESCUE i 0 RINGING ALARM 5 FALSE ALARM 85 HAZMAT I - TOTAL: 10 CITY OF TEMECULA 4,oEcol, FIRE D E PA RT M E N T Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management . . . . ��rf�111%111%IIII1��� LAN CHECKS/REVIEWS u 144 1 x 1. MONTHLY REPORT APRIL 2024 f_tt APRIL INSPECTION BREAKDOWN Iva II1i�,,::.. SPECIAL EVENT PERMITS YTD: 0 EDNSTRl7CTIDN LiaiE� 41i, illiE -INSPECTIONS 539 YTD: 2,200 ■■ ANNUAL F STATE MANDATED INSPECTIONS 2-4,46 PUBLIC INQUIRIES 47 YTD:148 CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management MONTHLY REPORT I APRIL 2024 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS: • Hosted a TEEN Cart Course April 5th [j 7th graduating 32 Students • OEM is working with ITSS to implement Desktop Alerting for emergency notifications • OEM and TCC attended the Wolf Greek Safety Fair sharing preparedness information C7`f **O� PLANNED COMMUNITY EVENTS SUPPORTED: CITY RESPONSE: 0 PREPAREDNESS TRAINING / EVENTS Community Presentations: 0 • OEM continues to work with TCSD on increasing Community Outreach for all residents Community Training: 2 -.�— ' TEEN Cert / Wolf Creek Safety Fair GRANTS H CLAIMS: r Community Preparedness Backpacks: 2 - • Awarded FY23 EMPG: $24,475o n, YTD:Total:6 ,. Awarded FY23 SHSP. $15,79E • TEE VOLUNTEER PROGRAM # of hours contributed: 468 ��� - EMERGENCY OPERATFONS CENTER # of hours YTD:1,777 r # of TEE Volunteers: 45 # of volunteer meetings: 3 # of training events: I (TEEN CERT) Activations: 0 Current Status: Normal Operations CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT Operations I Prevention I Training I Emergency Management Temecula Citizf z..... .... =I oom Mom- AW I 'a —an 411 "Wm In. ow Y, man", 000 1h &JI jw waftow, A If Item No. 5 California Highway Patrol Temecula Area Report for April 2024 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY -SA ,i_ r'jppp- <; r 'ji - ! ' y :l + J •5.-I ALIFORNIA HIGHWAY Services Provided 4. A f - Child Safety Seats installed 16 - —. Traffic Safety Presentations —7 - Community Events/Traffic Safety Booths - 10 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY -SA -NC • Citations Issued —910 • Verbal warnings — 303 • Total Enforcement Contacts — 1389 r, Driving Under the Influence • Monthly Arrests — 58 (51) • DUI crashes — 98 (17) 7 ti This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC Traffic Collisions • Non -Injury— 93 • Injury — 41 • Fatal —1 • Fata I Year to Date — 4 • Total Collisions —135 1 e rt Fatal Traffic Collisions / Major Investigations • SR-371 at Wilson Valley Road (solo vehicle) This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY -NC -ND This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY -SA Item No. 6 City of-Temecu la Traffic Report — April 2024 SNP IO%OW 1*04, L:� ,I r] lz SouthwestStation f0 4j0 !4*:v Mot Va IL : . do' ,41 ,� , s ,xt., . � . �► • � �' � .y � � - �� . Via, :�> Jt t ws� -, 4 , - r SNP L:� avt 4 At 4 k 4 Commercial Enf6 Jt f w _ PL y► ",. L SNP 10E A a 1 130 pit !v 41f %wit 41J AT 'lot. It #- 'LAO R �►' Ii 949 a Nr Oki. Ask �W� I*t .. • 1 ® • '*04 ~ Non -Hazardous CitatE'' "'Click It or Ticket" and/or Seatbelt Citations .,' Distracted . 4 ; Parking# - 'Written Warnings Issued ®®® �4 Stop Light Abuse / Intersection Program (SLAP) Red Light Commercial Enforcement Citations- �►41 , Non -Injury Collisions ®® �� ■„�Injury Collisions®®® , sDUI Arrests It ILI 44. NAF ` -:" Item No. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS IN PROGRESS (TRIP Report) 1. Ynez Rd. South of Pauba Project: Emergency Work Status: As of Monday, 5/13, Public Works will be on site repairing the street. Expect delays and possible detours. 2. 1-15, Temecula Parkway, and Rancho California Road Project: 1-15 Congestion Relief Status: Project construction will run March 2024 through December 2024. Work will involve northbound portions of 1-15 between Temecula Parkway and Rancho California Road, and the connecting on- and off -ramps. For traffic restrictions, please visit the project webpage at www.temeculaca.gov/CongestionRelief. 3. 1-15, I-215, Winchester Road, and Murrieta Hot Springs Road Project: 1-15 / French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II Status: Project construction will run May 2023 through May 2025. Work will involve northbound portions of 1-15 and 1-215 between Rancho California Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and the connecting on- and off -ramps. For traffic restrictions and additional information, please visit the project webpage at www.temeculaca.gov/FVP2. 4. Civic Center Event: Temecula Sunset Market Status: The new night market will be held May 8t", Wednesday from 5pm-9pm. - Road closure schedule is as follows: Main Street `Y' Closed March 8th Mercedes from third & Fourth Street 12:00p.m. to 11:00p.m. Updated OS/13/2024 pg. 1 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS IN PROGRESS (TRIP Report) 5. Diaz Rd. Between Rancho California Rd. and Rancho Way Event: Utility Work Status: EMWD performing a sewer modifications project resulting in the North Bound #2 lane closed, along with the Murrieta Creek multipurpose trail closed from January 2024 through July 2024. Anticipated completion end of summer 2024 6. First Street West of Pujol; Street and Vincent Moraga Drive South of Felix Valdez Project: Water Utility Work Status: Murrieta Development will be performing traffic flagging operations for new water service for the Altair Development. Working hours are 7:00 AM- 4:30 PM Monday through Friday. Anticipated completion will be the end of May 2024 7. Nicolas Detour Project: Nicolas Road Extension Status: Nicolas Road will be closed starting at Leifer / Calle Medusa. Traffic will detour along Calle Medusa to La Serena. Closure will begin at the end of April through the year 2024. Anticipated completion will be January 2025. Click wFr' to view the detour map. 8. Pujol Street at Main Street Event: Right of way work for the new Vine Creek Apartments Development Status: Starting March 4, 2024, Pacific West Builders will be performing wet and dry utility work on Pujol Street North of Main Street resulting in lane shifts and single lane flagging. Working hours are 8:30 a.m.- 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Anticipated completion end of May 2024. Updated OS/13/2024 pg. 2 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT TRAFFIC RESTRICTIONS IN PROGRESS (TRIP Report) 9. Tierra Vista and Ynez Road Project: Rancho Highlands Development Status: Reylenn Construction will be completing work for the new entrance of the Arrive at Rancho Highlands Development on the East section of Tierra Vista Road at Ynez Road. Beginning Thursday, May 2, 2024, East Tierra Vista Road and the entrance to the Temecula Duck Pond Park will be closed. In the interim, access to the Temecula Duck Pond Park will be detoured to the Oscars Brewing Company entrance off Rancho California Road. Anticipated completion end of June 2024. 10. Winchester Road at Enterprise Circle North/ Margarita Road at Verdes Lane/ Redhawk Pkwy at Paseo Parallon Project: Traffic Signal Upgrade Work Status: Starting March 4, 2024, Select Electric will be performing upgrade work to existing traffic signals resulting in periodic lane and shoulder closures. Working hours are 7:30 a.m.- 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. Anticipated completion May 2024. Updated OS/13/2024 pg. 3