HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-10 PC ResolutionPC RESOLUTION NO.2024-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA22-0929, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 60,258 SQUARE FOOT, FOUR-
STORY, 50 ROOM HOTEL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE
OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET APPROXIMATELY 400'
SOUTH OF SANTIAGO ROAD AND MAKING A FINDING
OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APN: 922-100-048)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On August 19, 2022, Sam Mohan filed Planning Application No. PA22-0929 a
Development Plan; Planning Application No. PA22-0930 a Minor Exception; and Planning
Application No. PA22-0931 a Variance. These applications (collectively "Project") were fled in
a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and
environmental review on June 19, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at
which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0929,
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F):
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
Hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town
Specific Plan. Therefore, the use is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the
Old Town Specific Plan as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of
the City.
B. The overall development of the land not designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety
of those working and living in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards
and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the
Development Plan Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project
has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332,
In -Fill Development Projects);
(a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general
plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.
The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an
allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The
project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General
Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation
of the Old Town Specific Plan.
(b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres
substantially surrounded by urban uses.
The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 0.98 acres in size. The
proposed project is substantially surrounded by commercial development, vacant land zoned for
commercial development, a major roadway, and Murrieta Creels
(c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.
The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell.
As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANSUPR process with the
Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 23-09-26-01 determined that the project is
consistent with other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also
determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The
project site lacks suitable riparian habitat to support riparian birds.
(d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air
quality, or water quality.
The proposed project was required to prepare a Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP
meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this
project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town
Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a
traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating
to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of
Temecula General Plan and the zoning district.
(e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.
The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities
and public services.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning
Application No. PA22-0929, a Development Plan for an approximately 60,258 square foot, four-
story, 50 room hotel located on the west side of Old Town Front Street approximately 400' south
of Santiago Road, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plan
Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 19th day of June, 2024.
Bob Hagel, Chair
ATTEST:
ka��
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024-10 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of June, 2024, by the
following vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watts
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
Matt Peters
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
FINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA22-0929
Project Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 60,258 square foot, four-story, 50
room hotel that includes retail spaces, a gym, meeting space, and a rooftop
restaurant and pool area. The project is located on the west side of Old
Town Front Street approximately 400' south of Santiago Road.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-100-048
MSHCP Category: Commercial
DIF Category: Service Commercial
TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office
Quimby Category: N/A (non-residential)
New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area)
Approval Date: June 19, 2024
Expiration Date: June 19, 2027
PLANNING DIVISION
Within 48 Hours of the Approval
Page 1 of 22
Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption.
APPLICANTACTION REQUIRED:
The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062
within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer
has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will
result in an extended period of time for legal challenges.
FEES:
Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee.
The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions.
FILING:
The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via
email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of
approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed
online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA
filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA.
COPY OF FILINGS:
The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours.
General Requirements
2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and
Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers,
agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials
(collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions,
lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the
Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related
entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy
any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in
any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of
any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails
to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right
to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other
Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection
therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be
construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall
estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City
or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as
they become due.
Page 2 of 22
Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it
shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit.
A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval
date of a development plan.
4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being
filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of
time, one year at a time.
A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval
date of a development plan.
Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall
be consistent with Specific Plan No. (enter SP # here).
6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially
conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division.
7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously
maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is
determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community
Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping
into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all
landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
9. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment,
walls, or other structures.
10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders,
sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or
from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval:
a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately.
b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite.
c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters.
d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain.
e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times.
Page 3 of 22
11. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent
specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall
be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of
that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute,
in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an
appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material Color
Stucco Shell White
Stucco Pediment
Brick Veneer Adobe Brick, Saltillo
Beam Espresso
Roof Tile Java Blend
Window System Clad Wood
Moulding Espresso
Awning Bronze
12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or
revisions to the approval of this project
13. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling
bin, as well as regular solid waste containers.
14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized
on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan.
15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the
construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover in
accordance with T.M.C. 17.10.020.S
16. Roof Mounted Mechanical Equipment Screening. The applicant shall be required to screen all
roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right of ways. If
upon final inspection it is determined that any roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right of way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening that shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development.
17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid
waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning
Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for
disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition
and construction debris.
18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art
Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Page 4 of 22
19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median,
landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on -site lighting shall be maintained by
the property owner or maintenance association.
20. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall provide evidence of
compliance with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project
Review letter (JPR# 23-09-26-01) dated April 11, 2024.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit
21. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground
water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and
double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
22. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed
at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and
approval by the Director of Community Development.
23. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes
Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site,
archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears
to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall
immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community
Development at their sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of
money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an
independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to
assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an
archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or
development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been
approved by the Director of Community Development."
24. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural
Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place
prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the
Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading
permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the
designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development
scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any
cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga
monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the
project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources
discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to
monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited
authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be
identified.
25. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction
(inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified
archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make
recommendations as to treatment."
Page 5 of 22
26. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to
stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their
designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered
on the property."
27. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading
Plan: "A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and
redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated
monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property."
28. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of
the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe
for proper treatment and disposition."
29. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved."
Page 6 of 22
30. Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural
resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or
environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall
be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple
artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the
find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined
in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s).
i. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall
be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal
representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of
the find.
At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after
consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be
made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the
appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural
resources.
iii. Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery
until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work
shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional
Tribal monitors if needed.
iv. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the
Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the
appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project
design, in -place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re -burial
on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as
identified in Non -Disclosure of Reburial Condition.
v. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved,
a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in
consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval
prior to implementation of the said plan.
vi. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of
preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and
the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or
cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development
Director for a decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the
determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with
respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and
shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe.
Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City
Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission
and/or City Council."
Page 7 of 22
31. Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are
discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures
shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with
the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community
Development Department:
i. Preservation -In -Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place
means
avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no
development affecting the integrity of the resources.
Reburial of the resources on the Project property (as identified on Burial Area Exhibit).
The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and
provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity.
Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have
been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native
American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally
appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the
confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a
confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
32. Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder
shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery
report, if required, and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with
the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV
report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the
construction staff held during the pre -grade meeting. The Community Development
Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided
the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.
Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the
Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1)
copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).
33. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall
retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to
monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological
resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural
resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will
be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of
any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors
shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall
also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent
cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the
end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern
Information Center at UC, Riverside.
Page 8 of 22
34. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County
Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance
until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside
County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage
Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission
must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the
discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours,
and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public
Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
35. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of
Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The
City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these
fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the
provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of
contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF
36. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15,
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the
appropriate City fee. Developers may request an audit of impact fees and/or may request
notice for meetings related to the fee account or fund information.
37. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation
Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be
submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These
plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of
Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
38. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted
at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment
and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual
conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where
applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without
loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating
properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved
construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance
for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact
the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
Page 9 of 22
39. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the
plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first
irrigation inspection."
40. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage
calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total
cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water
budget.
41. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to
the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape
development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program
shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry
out the detailed program.
42. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape
maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first
inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will
verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any
adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will
require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be
conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150
psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will
verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have
been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third
inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape
maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule
inspections.
43. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas
and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets
and adjacent property for private common areas, front yards and slopes within individual lots, -
shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to
66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard
landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas.
44. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough
grading plans including all structural setback measurements.
45. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include
detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains,
hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of
Community Development.
46. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with
Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for
plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan
for WQMP features.
Page 10 of 22
47. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction
drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a
three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before
starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities
is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
48. Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial
conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her
designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer
and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been
installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of
substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection.
49. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and
roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If
upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs
of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development.
50, Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting
and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and
shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants
shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly
constructed and in good working order.
51. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director
of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance
with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning
Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the
applicant.
52. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking
areas and striping shall be installed.
53. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with
prior to occupancy, or any use allowed by this approval.
Outside Agencies
54. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control Districts transmittal dated September 6, 2022, a copy of which is attached. The
fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's
check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date
by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
55. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set
forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated June 28, 2023, a copy of which is
attached.
Page 11 of 22
56. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in
the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated June 21, 2023, a copy of which is
attached.
57. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall provide evidence of
compliance with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project
Review letter (JPR# 23-09-26-01) dated April 11, 2024.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
58. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the
Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any
governmental agency.
59. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual
Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during
entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the
plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
60. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public
right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works.
61. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public
roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is
required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's
Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works.
62. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction,
encroachment permit(s) are required: and shall be obtained:
a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements;
b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if
encroaching within their right-of-way.
63. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement
plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with
Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles
showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and
flowline grades.
64. Right -of -Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to
the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or
abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by
Public Works.
65. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following
vehicular movements restrictions:
a. The future north access from Front Street shall be restricted to no entry/exit only
movement.
66. Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately
maintained.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
67. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per
the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
Page 12 of 22
68. Right -of -Way Dedication. The Developer shall submit a Right -of -Way Dedication application
to Public Works for review and approval.
a. Front Street
69. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as RCFC&WCD and other affected
agencies.
70. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion &
sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to
the site. The approved plan shall include all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls
to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction
Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM
71. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and
entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements.
72. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the
State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Construction Activities and shall provide the following:
a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB);
b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and
c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP
Developer (QSD)
Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's
storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated
and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely
updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City.
Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link:
http//wwwwaterboards ca aov/water issues/oroarams/stormwater/constructicn shtmi
73. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit
a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan
submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive
acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at
all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement
shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall
record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP
template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval,
the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES
requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible
for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement.
74. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City
that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee
has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required.
Page 13 of 22
75. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly
accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be
privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or
diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage
improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners.
All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible.
The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted.
76. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and
submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside
County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to
mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the
development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed
offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff
shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without
damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the
adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey
the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project.
77. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted
to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil
conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and
preliminary pavement sections.
78. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission
or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format
is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document
information shall be noted on the approved grading plan.
79. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street
intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
80. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of
the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
81. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed
development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public
right of way found to be non -compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be
removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code
Section 5610.
Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s)
82. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to
encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for
making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency.
83. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane
closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and
approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer
in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD) and City standards.
Page 14 of 22
84. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain,
traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works.
85. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's
Paving Notes.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
86. Right -of -Way Dedication. A recorded copy of the Right -of -Way Dedication shall be submitted
to Public Works prior to building permit issuance.
87. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by
Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public street improvements, as
outlined below, in accordance to the City's General Plan/Circulation Element and
corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate
right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street
improvements.
a. Front Street (Secondary Arterial (4 lanes undivided) Highway Standard No. 102 — 88' R/W)
to include 8-foot dedication of street right-of-way, installation of half -width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and
striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
88. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines,
except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15,
Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The
developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility
agency and for obtaining the necessary easements
89. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan — Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the
latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the
City Engineer.
b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance — All proposed public and
private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and
specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have
ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated
appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design
shall be incorporated in the project's street improvement plans or in a separate street light
plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer.
c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights —All new streetlights shall be designed as LS-3 rate
lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by
the City Engineer.
d. Street Light Service Point Addressing — The developer shall coordinate with the PW
Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required
street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City
and shall be located within public's right of way or within duly dedicated public easements.
90. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying
the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record
certifying compaction of the building pad(s).
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
91. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans
and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site
work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP
Operation and Maintenance agreement.
Page 15 of 22
92. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable
utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the
completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works.
93. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public
Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a
qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section
8771.
94. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies
and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works.
95. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the WQMP approval, the
Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES
requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible
for the execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Requirements
96. Final Building and Safety Conditions, Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed
when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These
conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related
codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal.
97. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the
most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California
Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24
Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
98. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and
building setbacks on plans to include:
a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building.
c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement.
d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash
enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas.
99. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review,
a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount
Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety
Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining
property or public rights -of -way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below.
100. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by
requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family
residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects.
Page 16 of 22
101. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School
District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or
exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
102. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit
approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
103. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards,
and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required
over new and existing trash enclosures.
104. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits.
105. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate
approvals and permits.
106. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project,
indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section
9.20.060, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours
of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is
permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays.
107. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of
exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site.
Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of
exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed.
108. Protection of Drains and Penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire
resistance -rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed
fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations
shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of
these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of
compliance for Building Official's approval.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
109. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances
per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 '12" outlets) shall be located on fire
access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the
street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a
looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and
Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
110. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building
plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on
occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related
codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
Page 17 of 22
111. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel
or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide
for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure for a 4-hour duration for this commercial project. The fire flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal
Code Section 15.16.020).
112. Occupancy Management. Per the California Building Code and California Fire Code, along
with Title 19 for Public Safety, the occupancy for this establishment must be complied with at
all times. The owner will be responsible for assigning designees to count patrons as they enter
and exit. At any given time, if the fire department and/or building department find you in
violation of this they will be required to either close the facility entirely, have the owner remove
patrons until the occupant load is at or less than allowed and request fines to be issued to the
owner. If there is continued violations occurring within the establishment the building
department and/or fire department will recommend that the city planning department revoke
the owners CUP.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
113. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width
of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
114. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to
support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather
driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness
of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations
where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and
Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
115. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15
percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
116. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall submit electronic copies
of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all
private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered
civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to
hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will
be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for
the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit
being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5).
117. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to
the issuance of building permit. The fire sprinkler riser will be placed in the fire sprinkler riser
room. This room only houses the fire alarm control panel and fire sprinkler riser.
118. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted electronically by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have
a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the
issuance of building permit. The fire alarm control panel will be placed in the fire sprinkler riser
room. this room only houses the fire alarm control panel and fire sprinkler riser.
Page 18 of 22
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
119. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access
roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox
Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5).
120. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective
markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
121. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six
feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5).
122. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or
approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the
street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background.
Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a
minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code
Section 15.16.020).
123. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site
plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5).
124. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic
file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire
Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
125. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are
kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking
into the buildings utilizing lower level windows.
126. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at
a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural
ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings.
127. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height.
128. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property.
Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or
where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police
Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key
box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access.
129. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours
of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
Page 19 of 22
130. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed
above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at
ground level, evenly dispersed.
131. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted
light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness.
132. Outdoor Lighting During Non -Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor's
order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a
substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non -business hours. The order, in
part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers,
auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability
during non -business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public,
employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law
enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000
in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
133. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms,
hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
134. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or
painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula
Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP.
135. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm
system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to
notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant
offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system.
This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7.
136. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
137. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop
addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches
apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent
yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the
street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
138. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with
Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
139. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest
procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime
prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit.
140. Compliance with State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Any business that serves
or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and
Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control.
141. Inspections and Training. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and
training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business
locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
142. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with
Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public
Prohibited.
Page 20 of 22
143. Employee Training for Identification Checks. The applicant shall ensure all employees
involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of
alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The
Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved
in service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a
training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Office at
(951) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training should be completed prior to the grand
opening of this business and periodic updated training should be conducted when new
employees/management are hired.
144. Identification Verification. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid
California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification
card (active/reserve/retired/dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or
Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued
identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency.
145. Acceptable Forms of Identification. As noted above, only a valid government issued
identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it
complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following
requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph;
(e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of business owners and any person
who sells or serves alcoholic beverages to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining
to alcoholic beverages.
Page 21 of 22
146. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental
design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept
that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the
fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary
strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below:
a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may
include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of
furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space.
b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they
are moving from public to semi-public to private space.
c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is
good surveillance and access control.
d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location
and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation
and possible intervention.
e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural
surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas
feel safer.
Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may
conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by
distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict.
g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for
normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and
intervention.
h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need
to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear
lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance.
Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved
communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as
the location of restrooms in a public building.
147. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location
can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951)
695-2773.
148. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be
directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951)
695-2773.
Page 22 of 22
f111 Lei g Mon
City of Temecula, Planning Department
4100 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Senior Planner
Leighton Consulting, Inc.
A Leighton Group Company
June 28, 2023
Project No. 11760.035
Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review - Final
Proposed Old Town Front Street Hotel (PA22-0929)
APN 922-100-048, Temecula, California
References: (1) Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report, Proposed Commercial Development, Assessor's Parcel
Number 922-100-006, Lot Number 2 of Town of Temecula, Subdivision, located on the West Side of Old
Town Front Street and South of First Street, Temecula, California, by Earth Strata Geotechnical Services,
Inc., Project No. 182385-10A, dated December 03, 2018
(2) Updated Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report, Proposed Commercial Development,
Assessor's Parcel Number 922-100-006, Lot Number 2 of Town of Temecula, Subdivision, Temecula,
California, by Earth Strata Geotechnical Services, Inc., Project No. 182385-10B, dated November 17, 2022
(3). Response to the Third Party Review Comments Regarding Updated Preliminary Geotechnical
Interpretive Report, Proposed Commercial Development, Assessors Parcel Number 922-100-006, Lot
Number 2 of Town of Temecula, Subdivision, Temecula, California, by Earth Strata Geotechnical Services,
Inc., Project No 182385-70B, dated June 14, 2023
In accordance with your request, we performed our review of the submitted response
(Reference 3 above). Based on this review, the project geotechnical report (Reference 1)
and subsequent clarifications/responses are considered satisfactory from a geotechnical
perspective and no further action is required by the consultant. The above referenced
responses should be considered as addendums to the project geotechnical report and part
of the project design/construction documents. Our above opinion/peer review is to help the
City in their review process of the submitted documents and the consultant remains solely
responsible for their findings and recommendations.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to City and please do not hesitate to us if you
have any question.
Respectfully submitted,
LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC.
b�RI F 9,
C21
ERTIFIED
OF M
Robert F. Riha, CEG * �IGINEEiiING
Senior Principal Geologist GEOLOGIST
s
Ext 8914, rriha@leightongroup.co q
Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF copy mai
ni /�fG �c
Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE
Senior Principal Engineer
Ext 8013, ssaiidleightongroup.
NAL,
2641
c
OTEC
�OF CA1�FO
41715 Enterprise Circle N, Suite 103, Temecula', CA 92S90
www.leightongroup.com
JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager -Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
www.reflood.org
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Temecula
Community Development Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: Scott Cooper
September 6, 2022
Re: PA 22-0929, APN 922-100-048
245613
The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend
conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check
City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.
District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the
District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities
which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage
Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received September 1, 2022. The
District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute
or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health
and safety, or any other such issue:
❑ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities
of regional interest proposed.
❑ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, The
District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant
shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation,
and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed
to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance.
Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All regulatory permits (and all
documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation
Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facility construction and maintenance
shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be
approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the
regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and
maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.
❑ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could
be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility. The District would
consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant
shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation,
and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed
to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance.
Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and
conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or
finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's
ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.
City of Temecula - 2 - September 6, 2022
Re: PA 22-0929, APN 922-100-048 245613
N This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek / Temecula Valley Area Drainage
Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional
impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid (in accordance with the Rules and Regulations
for Administration of Area Drainage Plans) to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of
grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the
actual permit.
N An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within
District right of way or facilities, namely, Murrieta Creek Channel. For further information, contact the
District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266.
❑ The District's previous comments are still valid.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given
until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior
to occupancy.
The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined
in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document (i.e., Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative
Declaration, Environmental Impact Report) and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, if a CEQA
document was prepared for the project. The project proponent shall also bear the responsibility for complying
with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply.
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant
to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality
Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance
of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours,
d1r7 ?&/2-am-
AMY MCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager
ec: Riverside County Planning Department
Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy
WMCJss:ju
O
s
Rr-
Pant and click on the map to get location detads
Location Info
Communities of Riverside County
4! City Name: TEMECULA
4e, RCFC Operating Zone
a h RCFC Zone: ZONE 7
Area: 403299 acre
Area: 630 mile'
r Supervisory Districts (2021)
District: 3
Supervisor: CHUCK WASHINGTON
4
Supervisory Districts (2011)
District. 3
Supervisor: CHUCK WASHINGTON
Supervisory Districts (2001)
District: 3
r
District: JEFF STONE
NPDES Watershed Boundaries
Name: SANTAMARGARITA RIVER
y. Township and Range
Township & Range: 08S03W12
ADP
Name: Murneta C�eebTemecula Valley
Master Drainage Plan
Name: Murneta Creek
Acres Area:135202
Zone No:
Adaption Date:510019200000
FEMA
Flood Zone: AE
a
I
FWesuthority
egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
onservation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Date: 04/11/24
tem Riverside County
Project Information
Permittee: City of Temecula
Case Information: PA22-0929 / Boutique Hotel
1.1 acres' (0.9-acre on -site permanent, 0.2-acre off -site
Site Acreage: permanent, and less than 0.1-acre off -site temporary)
Portion of Site Proposed for
MSHCP Conservation
Area: 0
Criteria Consistency Review
Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with Other Plan requirements with
implementation of the measures presented in these Findings (including any within the project
information provided to the Regional Conservation Authority by the Permittee for this JPR). A
determination of consistency with Criteria cannot be made because the Criteria did not take
into account the effects of a pre-MSHCP approved project that rendered the project site
incompatible with the intent of Constrained Linkage 13 (e.g., floodplain processes). Therefore,
the project site is not needed for reserve assembly.
Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed Linkage 10
Area Plan: Southwest
APN
Sub -Unit
Cell Group
Cell
922-100-048
SU1 — Murrieta Creek
N/A
7166
922-100-038*
922-100-039*
922-100-042*
922-100-043*
922-100-051*
Right -of -Way
*Denotes APNs that are partially impacted. The City will require any future proposed development in these APNs to demonstrate MSHCP
consistency and be processed through a separate joint project review.
Project Information
a. Project Documentation. JPR submittal materials provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application
Form (September 19, 2023), a HANS Application (September 19, 2023), City of Temecula Conformance
' JPR supporting documentation acreages are based on legal surveyed boundary (i.e., AutoCAD file from 4M that was converted for
GIS use); therefore, property and project acreages throughout JPR supporting documentation may not be exact and may not match
other sources (i.e., County APNs, RCA, etc.) due to the conversion process.
1
egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
onservation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Authority Date: 04/11 /24
Western Riverside County
Memorandum (September 19, 2023), a project site plan (September 19, 2023), and a Western Riverside
County MSHCP Consistency Analysis prepared by Searl Biological Services (Analysis; March 13, 2024).
b. Project Location. The project is located in the City of Temecula, west of Old Town Front Street, south of
First Street, and north of Temecula Parkway (Exhibit A). It is located in the southern portion of the MSHCP
Area (Exhibit B).
Project Description. The project includes the construction of a luxury hotel. According to the Analysis, the
project occurs on a compacted, disturbed/maintained vacant lot, in an urban setting. It is situated above
channelized Murrieta Creek and separated from the Creek by a flood wall, paved access/road trail,
landscaping, and fencing. The project is currently used for overflow parking for adjacent businesses and is
routinely maintained through scraping and other vegetation suppression mechanisms. The project site is
primarily comprised of disturbed and developed land, but also contains a narrow strip of coastal sage
scrub/ruderal. MSHCP baseline vegetation communities (1994) within the project site consist of grassland,
riparian scrub, woodland forest, and developed or disturbed land (Exhibit Q. Soils mapped on the project
site include Hanford coarse sandy loam, Chino silt loam, drained, saline -alkali, and Riverwash (Exhibit D).
The project includes on -site permanent development of 0.9 acre, off -site permanent development of 0.2 acre,
and off -site temporary impacts of less than 0.1 acre (Exhibit E). Off -site temporary impacts are associated
with ingress/egress. Information on staging of equipment and construction materials was not provided. No
weed abatement/fuel modification zones are proposed or required. The project site is located adjacent to
Murrieta Creek (MSHCP Proposed Constrained Linkage 13).
Relation to Reserve Assembly
a. Reserve Assembly Summary. The project site is located along Murrieta Creek within Independent Cell 7166.
Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed
Linkage 10. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, "Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 consists of
Murrieta Creek, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. This Constrained Linkage connects
Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Proposed Linkage 10 in the south.
This Linkage is constrained along most of its length by existing urban development and agricultural use and
the planned land use surrounding the Linkage consists of City (Murrieta and Temecula). Therefore, care
must be taken to maintain high quality riparian habitat within the Linkage and along the edges for species
such as yellow warbler, yellow -breasted chat, and least Bell's vireo, which have key populations located in
or along the creek. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also
important to western pond turtle and arroyo chub in this area."
Conservation within this Cell will focus on riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat along
Murrieta Creek and on additional chaparral habitat in the western portion of the Cell. Areas conserved within
this Cell will be connected to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell
2
egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
onservation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Authority Date: 04/11/24
Western Riverside County
7079 to the north, to chaparral, grassland, riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation
in Cell 7264 to the south and to chaparral habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 7164 to the west.
Conservation within this Cell will range from 35%45% of the Cell focusing in the southwestern portion of
the Cell.
Cell 7166 totals approximately 139.0 acres. Using the low -range (35%) conservation goal, approximately 48.6
acres are described for conservation within this Cell to support both Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and
Proposed Linkage 10. In review of the MSHCP description of conservation in this Cell in combination with
1994 baseline vegetation mapping, roughly 28 acres of chaparral are to support Proposed Linkage 10 while
the remainder are to support Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 (roughly 20 acres) in the form of riparian scrub,
woodland, forest and grassland habitat. To date, no MSHCP conservation has occurred. Because Proposed
Linkage 10 in this Cell is outside the sphere of the proposed project, no further discussion will be provided
on this Linkage.
Prior to completion of the MSHCP (June 2004), the Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental
Restoration and Recreation Project (MCFC Project), a public project by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC) was finalized in
20002 with revisions to Phase II of the MCFC Project processing a final Supplemental Environmental
Assessment and Supplement Environmental Impact Report in 2014'. The high-level elements of the MCFC
Project were to improve flood control, create a multi -purpose trail, and establish higher quality riparian
habitat along the existing Murrieta Creek channel. The Corps was to construct the MCFC Project while
RCFC owned the channel right-of-way and was to provide project funding and operation and maintenance
of the completed Project.
The MSHCP was in development prior to and after finalization of the MCFC Project (2000) and established
Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 along Murrieta Creek including bringing the Creek into the MSHCP
reserve as conservation lands expressly managed for MSHCP-covered species. A wildlife corridor as
envisioned by the MSHCP for Murrieta Creek was not incorporated in the MCFC Project and is
incompatible with the MCFC Project as the latter is a maintained channel and is managed for flood control,
not species.
Specifically, the project site occurs in Phase II of the MCFC Project which began construction in 2015/2016
and has been completed. Prior to construction of Phase II, the project site was part of the Murrieta Creek
floodplain and provided refugia for some of the MSHCP Planning Species for Proposed Constrained Linkage
13. Construction of the MCFC Project lowered Murrieta Creek elevation and included the installation of
retaining walls separating Murrieta Creek from the adjacent floodplain, including the project site. The project
2 Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project and Final Environmental Impact
Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR), September 2000.
3 Murrieta Creek Flood Control/Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project and Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment
and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, July 2014.
egional
onservation
Authority
Wes
tem Riverside County
site was used for staging by the Phase II MCFC Project with all biological resources removed and resulting in
a roughly 15-foot flood wall, a paved access/road trail, landscaping, and fencing all between the project site
and the Creek.
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Date: 04/ 11 /24
Due to the pre-MSHCP approved MCFC project, the project site has no potential to functionally contribute
to Proposed Constrained Linkage 13. The site is nearly devoid of vegetation, does not provide riparian scrub,
woodland, forest and grassland habitat to support MSHCP Planning Species for this Linkage, nor does it
provide refugia during large-scale flooding events because the project site is separated from the Creek, as
discussed above. The project site is not suitable and is incompatible to support MSHCP reserve establishment
for Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and there is no potential for it to provide such functionality in the future.
The MSHCP provides for a Criteria Refinement when a project covered by the MSHCP is proposed to
remove land described for conservation. The MCFC project was not processed under the MSHCP4, so there
was no nexus to require the MCFC project to implement a Criteria Refinement to replace impacted land
(including the project site) that was described for conservation. The RCA is working with the Wildlife
Agencies on the feasibility of replacing, within the MSHCP Plan Boundary, the ecological values and
functions affected by the MCFC Project in Proposed Constrained Linkage 13.
b. Rough Step. The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 5 which tracks five vegetation types: coastal
sage scrub; grasslands; woodlands and forests; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; and Riversidean alluvial fan
sage scrub.
MSHCP baseline vegetation communities (1994) within the project site for those tracked by this Unit
consists of 0.1 acre of grassland and 0.3 acre of riparian scrub, woodland forest (Exhibit Q. All vegetation
categories were in Rough Step at the time of these Findings and the proposed project does not conflict with
Rough Step. However, the Rough Step Unit 5 development allowance may have changed by the time this
project submits for a grading permit. As such, the RCA provides the following required Measure to ensure the
City does not exceed Rough Step allowances:
ROUGH STEP MEASURE. In accordance with MSHCP Volume I, Section 6.7, it is the Permittees
responsibility that [ijf the rough step rule is not met during any analysis period (performed annually by
the Regional Conservation Authority [RCA]), the Permittees must conserve appropriate lands supporting
a specified vegetation community within the analysis unit to bring the Plan back into the parameters of the
rule prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation community for which the rule was not achieved
The Permittee is encouraged to consult with the RCA on current rough step allowances prior to working
with project applicants developing grading plans. The Permittee must not cause additional loss of any
rough step vegetation that is out of balance. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Permittee will
° Murrieta Creek Flood Control/Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project and Final Supplemental Environmental Assessment
and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, July 2014.
4
ft—onservation
egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Authority Date: 04/11/24
Western Riverside County
confirm with the RCA that the Project will not impact out -of -balance Rough Step vegetation in the
applicable Rough Step unit.
Other Plan Requirements (MSHCP Volume I)
Section 6.1.2 — Was Riparian/Riverine/Vernal Pool Mapping or Information Provided?
Yes. There are no Riparian/Riverine areas on the project site. There are no vernal pools on the project site, and
the soils and topography present on the site do not support habitat considered suitable for fairy shrimp.
There is no suitable riparian bird habitat on the project site.
Section 6.1.3 — Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided?
Yes. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area.
Section 6.3.2 — Was Additional Survey Information Provided?
Yes. The project site is not located in a Criteria Area Species Survey Area for plants. The project site is not
located in Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Areas for amphibians or small mammals. The project
site does not support Delhi sands (Exhibit D) or in areas that would trigger additional review for Delhi
sands flower -loving fly (Rhaphiomidas terminates abdominalis). However, a portion of the project site
is located in an Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area for burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia).
Section 6.1.4 — Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided?
Yes. The property is located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas.
Comments on Other Plan Requirements:
a. Section 6.1.2. The following discusses each requirement under this policy.
Riparian/Riverine. The project site was assessed for riparian/riverine features on June 24, 2022 and
additional site assessments were conducted on March 9 and April 11, 2023. As presented in the Analysis,
the project site is not hydrologically connected to Murrieta Creek. The site is isolated and located above
Murrieta Creek; separated by a flood wall, paved access/road trail, landscaping, and fencing associated with
the MCFC Project. The entire project site was used for staging by the MCFC Project. Currently, a heavily
manipulated erosional ephemeral swale (swale) occurs along the southern project site boundary that
collects storm runoff form Old Town Front Street. This swale is not connected upstream, nor is it
connected downstream to Murrieta Creek due to the MCFC Project. There is a box storm drain
approximately 15-feet off -site to the west; however, due to its location and elevation, it does not function
as a drain collection for the swale and may have been installed to collect runoff from the surrounding
MCFC Project landscaping. Riparian/riverine resources are absent from the project site. Based upon this
information, the proposed project will not result in impacts to riparian/riverine resources.
F�
gional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
nservation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
.i1L_ _:&—. Date: 04/ 11 /24
Western Riverside County
Vernal Pools/Fairy Shrimp. The project site was assessed for vernal pools and suitable fairy shrimp
habitat on June 24, 2022, and additional site assessments were conducted on March 9 and April 11, 2023.
According to the Analysis, the project site lacks suitable soils (including placement of gravel), vegetation,
and hydrology to support vernal pools. The project site is highly disturbed and heavily compacted from past
grading operations, including construction of Phase II of the MCFC Project, when the entire project site was
used for staging. Across the years the project site has been used also for overflow parking from Old Town
Temecula.
The RCA completed a desktop analysis and field review and determined there is no potential for
vernal pool resources at the project site. This conclusion is based on a review of aerial imagery from
Google Earth and available online historic aerials and past disturbances of the project site. The desktop
analysis noted signs of ponding or moist/wet soils in aerial imagery from 2018, 2020, and 2023.
However, the MCFC Project graded the project site in 2015/2016, thereby precluding the presence of
fairy shrimp or vernal pools but likely causing soil compaction and hence creating potential for
ponding as observed in satellite imagery dating after the MCFC Project began. It is less than
reasonable to assume listed fairy shrimp have been transported to the project site since grading
operations and specifically since the MCFC Project. Focused surveys are not warranted.
Riparian Birds. The project site lacks suitable riparian habitat to support riparian birds, including least Bell's
vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), and western
yellow -billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus occidentalis) and is outside the sphere of influence of potentially
occupied habitat for these species. Therefore, focused surveys were not warranted.
Based on the information provided in the Analysis, the project meets Section 6.1.2 MSHCP
requirements.
b. Section 6.1.3 NEPSSA Plants. The project site is not located within a NEPSSA plant survey area; therefore,
NEPSSA plant focused surveys were not warranted, and the project meets Section 6.1.3 MSHCP
requirements.
c. Section 6.3.2. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The following describes Additional Survey
Needs and Procedures applicable to the proposed project:
Burrowing Owl. A portion of the project site is located in the Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area
for burrowing owl. In accordance with the County of Riverside's Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the
Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Area (County of Riverside 2006), a Step I
Habitat Assessment was conducted on June 24, 2022. As presented in the Analysis, the project site contains
heavily compacted soils from past anthropogenic disturbance that preclude an animal from establishing a
burrow. As such, Step II Part A Focused Burrow Survey and Step II B Focused Burrowing Owl Surveys were
not warranted.
Based on the information provided by in the Analysis, the project meets Section 6.3.2 MSHCP
requirements.
rel
egional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
onservation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Authority Date: 04/11/24
Western Riverside County
d. Section 6.1.4. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. To preserve the integrity of biological resources
in Murrieta Creek, the guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP should be considered by the
Permittee in their actions relative to the project. Therefore, the Permittee should include the following
measures as project conditions of approval, as applicable:
SECTION 6.1.4 MEASURE.
i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the
MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge
of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Conservation Areas.
Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent the release of toxins,
chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade
or harm downstream biological resources or ecosystems.
ii. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or
generate bioproducts, such as manure, that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect
wildlife species, Habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application
of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest
risk is from landscaping fertilization overspray and runoff.
iii. Night lighting shall be shielded and directed downward and away from the MSHCP
Conservation Area to protect species from direct night lighting. Post -project ambient light
levels within the MSHCP Conservation Area shall not exceed that of pre -project conditions
as a result of light spill from the Project site. A responsible party, such as a Homeowners
Association or other legally recognized entity, will be assigned prior to occupancy and will
be responsible for maintaining the lighting in perpetuity. Any lighting issues will be
addressed within 30 days of receiving input from the RCA.
iv. Proposed noise -generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area, including
designated avoidance areas, shall incorporate setbacks, berms, or walls to minimize the effects
of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations, and
guidelines related to land use noise standards.
v. Avoid use of invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in approving
landscape plans for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area,
including avoidance areas. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include
proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas and designated avoidance areas,
species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation
Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls,
topography, and other features.
vi. Fencing shall be designed to prevent access to the MSHCP Conservation Area by unauthorized
public access, domestic animals, and illegal trespass or dumping. This shall include, at a
7
RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
Conservation
Authority
Western Riverside County
JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Date: 04/ 11 /24
minimum, barriers with a minimum height of 6 feet with no greater than 2-inch openings (i.e.,
tubular steel fencing with tines set on 2-inch centers) and shall include a metallic or masonry
component (i.e. wire mesh cloth) buried to a minimum depth of 12 inches below ground surface
level to prevent domestic animals from gaining access to the MSHCP Conservation Area by
digging under. This fencing shall be installed at the interface with the MSHCP Conservation
Area, as well as other portions of the Project where access to the MSHCP Conservation Area
could be achieved.
vii. Manufactured slopes associated with proposed site development shall not extend into the
MSHCP Conservation Area.
viii. Weed abatement and fuel modification activities are not permitted in the Conservation Area,
including designated avoidance areas.
e. Appendix C. The following best management practices (BMPs), as applicable, shall be implemented for
the duration of construction:
APPENDIX C MEASURE.
A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a
training session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description
of the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act
(Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the
penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are
being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the
access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be
accomplished.
ii. Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance
with RWQCB requirements.
iii. The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to sites
shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible.
iv. The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral limits of disturbance
on either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by
the biologist prior to initiation of work.
V. Projects should be designed to avoid the placement of equipment and personnel within the stream
channel or on sand and gravel bars, banks, and adjacent upland habitats used by target species of
concern.
vi. Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in sensitive habitats
should be timed to avoid the breeding season of riparian species identified in MSHCP Global
Species Objective No. 7.
8
Regional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
Conservation
JPR #: 23-09-26-01
Authority Date: 04/11/24
Western Riverside County
vii. When stream flows must be diverted, the diversions shall be conducted using sandbags or
other methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing of other sediment trapping
materials shall be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the
transport of sediments off site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected shall be cleaned out
in a manner that prevents the sediment from reentering the stream. Care shall be exercised
when removing silt fences, as feasible, to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the
stream.
viii. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal
risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas
shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat.
Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances
into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to
appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and
CDFG [CDFW], RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils
removed to approved disposal areas.
ix. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other
similar debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks.
X. The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the
project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance
of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint.
xi. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent
practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated
with appropriate native species.
xii. Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently
removed from the site to the extent feasible.
xiii. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean
of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and
regularly removed from the site(s).
xiv. Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and
construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and
routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area necessary to complete the
project and shall be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with
orange snow screen. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all
construction activities. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the
construction areas.
6
ional RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings
servation JPR #: 23-09-26-01
160%W;OM, Date: 04/ 11 /24
Western Riverside County
xv. The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects including
any restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions, including
these BMPs.
BS/TC/AG
10
�P' SINGLE OANaR � ��NOINONI.P�� � p a,
°� � auk LPM�p O�'S "T9 LOwP�
aTn °4 iT
RPNLW]GAUFO�RO i � ,pw1
� 'y^ [N , / VIP VELEZPL LA PRWAVe�
fOCA50 PPUEA Re
y � s 90 i LOLINA VERGE
qPe
�y 1'i'y ! LA1}ENPLCON mpg
i , r t5
..\ ;;i'' /I;/'/'• / �(i" / V NPFNLttt� �(} 6U>7 � y4 m
\ / /♦ / / / q4 �/Oq LAIIRIE PAE LN ��
/I/// � LNPNtELLE LT
City of
/Ternecula11
\` / �h4 'VORINGATE AVEa 51=L��
`f
,
JPR Proposed Project Boundary MSHCP Conserved ARL (Land)
Private Development MSHCP Covered Road
Public Development Rough Step Unit
Proposed/Future MSHCP Consewalion Q Cell Group
�
Q Criteria Cell
q�
j_„_: City Boundary
r
Parcel Boundary
"w•
ONV Highway
,
Centerline
•!
,.. _, r u-. o.�a.re.�. A�„am 2caa. co�•rol R.��.. r.,_ c» v-eo_ra_.
P-M
PA22-092 cduet Temecu! o
PA22-09298outque Luvury Horel
EXHIBITA
JPR Log No. 23-09-26-01- Regional
Proposed Linkages
.; Constrained Linka
0.0 Linkage
"'�i Existing Channel
Existing Cores iE Unkst
Constrained Links
Core
Linkage
Noncontiguous K
Proposed Cores & Habl
� Core
tam Proposed Extend
— NonoontigmusHammy.—
Pe-ttee. Car of Terr WOM e 0 2 4
PA22
PA22-0929 Boulkpra LuwyttoM vMiles
EXHIBIT B
JPR Log No. 23-09-26-01 - Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages
PAewtlee City
J Hotel
112
P 22-0 50 100
Partnilbe Ci of TematJa �0 � eel
rrny Q� ry
EXHIBIT C
JPR Log No. 23-09-26-01- MSHCP 1994 Baseline Vegetation
14542 EXHIBIT D
P.-ftee City of Temecula 'ei
PA22-0929 Boutique Luxury Hotel () JPR Log No. 23-09-26-01 - Soil
esaz EXHIBIT E
a PArmnoo City ti Laur e JPR Log No. 23-09-26-01 - Project DeW
PA22-0929 9outxaue Luxury Hotel
(P
Rancho
Water
June 21, 2023
Case Planner
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Board of Directors
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
John V. Rossi
OLD TOWN FRONT STREET
President
PA 22-0929
Brian J. Brady
LOT Z IN BLOCK 32
Senior Vice President
APN 922-200-048
Carol Lee Gonzales -Brady
[OM RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE, LLC]
J. D. Harkey
Dear Case Planner:
John E. Hoagland
William E. Plummer
Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within
Bill Wilson
the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (Rancho
Water/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 20-inch diameter
Officers water pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) and an existing 20-inch recycled water
Robert S. Grantham pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Old Town Front Street. Please refer to the
General Manager
enclosed exhibit map.
Jake Wiley, P.E.
Assstant General Manager
EngineringandOpeation Water service to the subject project/property does not exist. Additions or
Engineering and Operations
Kathleen M. Naylor modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and
Chief Financial Officer Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the
KealE.Garcia completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property
District Secretary owner.
James B. Gilpin
Best Best& Krieger UP Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within
General Counsel
dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be
required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water
services/meters for domestic service, fire service, and landscape irrigation service,
as applicable. Beginning in 2018, newly constructed multi -unit residential
structures are required to measure the quantity of water supplied to each
individual residential dwelling unit.
Where private on -site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or
other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units
(only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such
'common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners'
Association, Rancho Water requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal
Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants,
codes, and restrictions.
- _ 23\EP:mb,037\F450\FEG
--
Rant o California Water District
42135 W ricnester Road • Temecula, California 92590.4800 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 - www.ranchowater.com
Case Planner/City of Temecut..
June 21, 2023
Page Two
Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that
assigns water management rights, if any, to Rancho Water. In addition, water availability is
subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to Rancho Water's
Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the
adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the
Lead Agency.
In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5 and subject to a Notice of Determination by Rancho
Water, the project/property may be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation,
which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water
service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and/or off -site
recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water
and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from Rancho
Water.
As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
documents, the project proponent should contact Rancho Water for a determination of existing
water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as
well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required
for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact Rancho
Water for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements.
Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern
Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property,
all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control
Board, health department, and/or other requirements as they relate to the protection of
groundwater quality, pursuant to Rancho Water's Groundwater Protection Policy.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering
Technician at the District office at (951) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Erica Peter
Senior Engineering Technician
Enclosure: Exhibit Map
cc: Jeff Kirshberg, Director of Planning
Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor
Kim Moring, 4M Engineering & Development, LLC
23\EP:mb037\F450\FEG _
Rancho Cali ornla Water District
42135 Winchester Road • Temecula, California 92590-4800 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX 1951) 296-6860 • www.ranchowater.com
c?ss ycA
o�
9
n
-o
N,
r
O N �
cT
�O
2a
~ N
922-100-048
e�
1p
y
n Os �O
c+; .. RGZ55PGP
RGZ55PGP '
d
a
o�
A