Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11202024 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 20, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chair Bob Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Adam A. Ruiz ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to 6:00 p.m. and submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the action minutes of October 2, 2024Recommendation: MinutesAttachments: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda November 20, 2024 PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.CONTINUED FROM MAY 15, 2024 MEETING: Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden; and PA 22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Old Town Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNs : 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023), Scott Cooper Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0035, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 285,125 SQUARE FOOT, 350 ROOM, SEVEN (7) STORY, FULL SERVICE HOTEL THAT INCLUDES AN APPROXIMATELY 174,382 SQUARE FOOT PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0037, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM 38349) TO COMBINE TEN EXISTING LOTS INTO A SINGLE LOT LOCATED Recommendation: Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda November 20, 2024 ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Agenda Report Aerial Map PC Resolution – Development Plan Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Development Plan Exhibit B - Plan Reductions - Development Plans.pdf PC Resolution – Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit B - Plan Reductions – Tentative Parcel Map Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, December 4, 2024, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 Item No. 1 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 2, 2024 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chair Bob Hagel FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Lanae Turley-Trejo ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the Commission: Sandra Aguirre (Item #2) CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the action minutes of September 4, 2024 Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Turley-Trejo. The vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING 2. Planning Application No. PA24-0254, a Conditional Use Permit application for a Type 47 ABC license for Landeros Mexican Grill and Cantina located at 41925 Fifth Street, Suite 102, Jaime Cardenas Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA24-0254, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A TYPE 47 ABC LICENSE FOR LANDEROS MEXICAN GRILL AND CANTINA LOCATED AT 41925 FIFTH STREET, SUITE 102 AND TO MAKE FINDINGS OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN: 922-024-012) Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Solis. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 2 3. Planning Application Nos. PA22-1124 and PA22-1125, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of an approximately 64,051 square foot Paradise Chevrolet commercial truck dealership that includes rooftop parking, sales, service, and parts storage located at 42105 DLR Drive (APN: 921-730-072), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 64,051 SQUARE FOOT PARADISE CHEVROLET COMMERCIAL TRUCK DEALERSHIP THAT INCLUDES ROOFTOP PARKING, SALES, SERVICE, AND PARTS STORAGE LOCATED AT 42105 DLR DRIVE (APN: 921-730-072) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-1125, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 64,051 SQUARE FOOT PARADISE CHEVROLET COMMERCIAL TRUCK DEALERSHIP THAT INCLUDES ROOFTOP PARKING, SALES, SERVICE, AND PARTS STORAGE LOCATED AT 42105 DLR DRIVE (APN: 921-730-072) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-1124, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 64,051 SQUARE FOOT PARADISE CHEVROLET COMMERCIAL TRUCK DEALERSHIP THAT INCLUDES ROOFTOP PARKING, SALES, SERVICE, AND PARTS STORAGE LOCATED AT 42105 DLR DRIVE (APN: 921-730-072) Approved the Staff Recommendation approving the project and approving the elimination of the landscape area from the four (4) landscape islands on the rear of the project site based on the Planning Commission’s interpretation of Section 17.10.020.D.1.a that the landscape area is not adjacent to the main entry drive. Applicant is to resubmit the landscape plans and site plan set to reflect the removal of the four (4) areas (5 0): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Watts. The vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONER REPORTS 3 COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 7:15 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, October 16, 2024, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Bob Hagel, Chair Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development Item No. 2 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development DATE OF MEETING: November 20, 2024 PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden; and PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Old Town Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNs: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Steve Kim General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Interstate 15 / Open Space (OS), Low Medium Density Residential (LM) South: First Street, Old Town Front Street, Commercial Buildings / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) 2 East: First Street, Interstate 15, Commercial Building / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Second Street, Commercial Building / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 2.15 Acres 0.08 Acres Minimum Parking Provided/Required: 380 Parking Spaces 379 Parking Spaces (required) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim submitted Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim submitted Planning Application No. PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project is located on the east side of Old Town Front Street between First Street and Second Street On July 26, 2022, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Councilmembers Jessica Alexander and Zak Schwank. A representative of the applicant along with two (2) members of the public were in attendance. There were concerns from the Steering Committee in regard to how the building interacts with Old Town, the “canyon effect” along Second Street, the location of the pool on the eastern and not western side of the building, and the massing of the building. The Steering Committee encouraged the applicant’s representative to listen to staff. On September 27, 2022, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Councilmembers Jessica Alexander and Zak Schwank. The applicant team and one (1) member of the public were in attendance. There were concerns from the Steering Committee in regard to how the building interacts with Old Town, the “canyon effect” along Second Street, the location of the pool on the eastern and not western side of the building and the massing of the building as seen at the southern entrance to Old Town. On October 19, 2022, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant was not present for this meeting and staff did provide the comments from this meeting as part of the fourth project comment letter dated October 24, 2022. There were concerns from the Subcommittee in regard to the massing of the building and lack of building articulation along the streets, the entrance to the hotel should be a grand entrance that draws people into the building, location of the pool adjacent to the freeway as opposed to being located on the western side of the building facing and interacting with Old Town, the outside of the building has to be right and fit in Old Town, and that the project should not move forward to Planning Commission unless every development standard in the Specific Plan has been met. 3 On April 25, 2023, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Mayor Zak Schwank and Councilmember Curtis Brown. The applicant team was in attendance. The concerns from the Steering Committee were not a single item but the “totality” of everything and the applicant team was encouraged to continue to work with staff. When the applicant indicated that he wanted to move on to Planning Commission without addressing outstanding staff comments the Steering Committee said to take it to Planning Commission. On May 23, 2023, the project was presented at a public meeting of the City Council Old Town Steering Committee which consisted of Mayor Zak Schwank and Councilmember Curtis Brown. The applicant team was in attendance. The Steering Committee had concerns that nothing had changed since the project was last presented to the Steering Committee and they have a duty as council members to the residents of the City for the project to comply with the Specific Plan. On September 6, 2023, the proposed project was considered by the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. On January 14, 2024, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant’s attendance was not requested for this meeting and staff did provide the comments to the applicant following the meeting. There was a discussion regarding “standards vs guidelines” and the subcommittee indicated that while there is improvement that had been made to the project, the project had not gone far enough. On March 20, 2024, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant’s attendance was not requested for this meeting and staff did provide the comments to applicant following the meeting. There was a discussion regarding an architectural design guideline on Page V-19 of the Old Town Specific Plan as it relates to building form and how that pertains to the proposed project and to Old Town. At the conclusion of the meeting the subcommittee recommended that the revised project as a whole be presented to the other Planning Commissioners prior to any public hearing in the form of 1:1 or 2:1 meetings and that the architectural guideline from Page V-19 of the Old Town Specific Plan be added to the staff report. On May 15, 2024, the proposed project was considered by the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted for redesign of the project in order to further comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan as well as requested that the pool area be relocated from the freeway side of the building to a location that provides engagement with Old Town, that additional horizontal and vertical articulation of the building is provided, and that the hotel provides functioning balconies. On September 12, 2024, staff presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The applicant’s attendance was not requested at this meeting. There was a 4 discussion regarding the changes made to the project including the new location of the pool located on Old Town Front Street, the massing of the building, and the balconies. On September 18, 2024, staff and the applicant presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley-Trejo and Gary Watts. The presentation of the revised project focused on the revised pool location on Old Town Front Street, articulation of the building, and the balconies. The subcommittee indicated that while there was improvement that had been made to the project and that the applicant listened to the direction of the Planning Commissioners at the previous hearing, the massing along Old Town Front Street and First Street was still an issue and the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street should be a focal point of the project. There was discussion on locating the pool to this corner/side of the building in order to push the massing of the building further back off of the streets and to maximize the engagement with Old Town. On October 10, 2024, staff and the applicant presented the project to the Planning Commission Old Town Temecula Subcommittee which consisted of Planning Commissioners Lanae Turley- Trejo and Gary Watts. The presentation of the revised project focused on the location of the pool moving to the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street, additional building articulation, and the design and location of functioning balconies. After discussion between staff, the subcommittee, and the applicant regarding the revised project it was determined that staff would follow up with the applicant regarding next steps. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The proposed project entails a seven (7) story full service hotel connected to a four (4) level parking garage containing one (1) basement level and three (3) above ground levels housing 380 parking spaces. A floor-by-floor breakdown of the programming of the hotel is as follows: 1st Floor (street level): exterior entrance to the hotel from Old Town Front Street, interior entrance to the hotel from the parking garage, registration area, ballroom, banquet lounge, family restaurant with a private dining area, offices, retail spaces, outdoor dining and back of house uses. 2nd Floor: ballroom, meeting rooms, day spa facilities including treatment rooms, sauna, steam room and lounges, beauty salon, boutique, restaurant with outdoor dining, kids’ room, gym facility, yoga room, and retail outlets. 3rd Floor: guest rooms including five (5) rooms with decks that overlook Second Street and an additional 10 on the western facing elevation, wedding garden and a dog park/run including clear acrylic sound panels on the rear of the building and a pool area overlooking Old Town Front Street and First Street. 4th Floor to 6th Floor: guest rooms 5 7th Floor: guest rooms including 14 rooms with a deck area for the guests. The vehicle access to the proposed project is from both First Street and Second Street utilizing the parking garage which includes a drop off area. The project proposes 380 parking spaces which exceeds the required number of 379 parking spaces accounting for the proposed 350 hotel rooms and approximately 8,507 square feet of meeting space, electric vehicle parking spaces, bike racks, and motorcycle parking. Pedestrian access to the lobby of the hotel is from an entrance off of Old Town Front Street which enters into a hallway that guides guests, tourists, and residents to t he lobby. Access to the lobby is also provided internally from the parking garage, which offers pedestrian entrances from First Street and Second Street that are separated from the vehicle entrances in order to avoid the pedestrian versus vehicle interaction. An entrance on the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street offers a direct entrance into the first floor restaurant and two separate entrances on Second Street provides for access to retail outlets. Outdoor dining is proposed both on Old Town Front Street and First Street. Architecture The primary architectural style of the proposed project is Neo-Classical Revival which is an allowed architectural style per the Old Town Specific Plan. Style elements included within the design of the project include prominent vertical columns extending from the ground to the top of the first floor and second floor and also from the third floor to the top of the building connecting with the roofline pediments that contain a motif. A decorative horizonal band is utilized between the first and second floors in order to break up the strong massing of the base of the building. A vertical quoin architectural element on the corners of the building assists in the breaking up of the primary stucco element on all building facades. Shopfront and gallery frontages are used interchangeably along the streetscape of the project allowing for outdoor dining and street activation areas. A gallery frontage is proposed along First Street and wraps around the corner onto Old Town Front Street which assists in breaking up the massing of the base of the building. The roof of the gallery also provides balcony space off the second floor restaurant which activates the area of First Street below. Second Street combines shopfront and gallery frontages and due to the existing conditions of a cul-de-sac it allows for an additional step back of the massing of the building from Second Street which provides for additional building articulation. Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay Zoning District The proposed project is located within the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District. On May 25, 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 10-09 which, among other things, allows for the development of a full service hotel at a greater building height than other buildings in Old Town (up to eight stories and 100 feet in height). This height allowance is an incentive to bring additional economic activity into Old Town including conventions, large meetings, and groups. In order to receive the height incentive and designation of a full service hotel the project is required to meet the development standards of the zoning district in addition to the supplemental requirements which include: Hotel lobbies shall be located along streets, plazas, courtyards or sidewalks to create visual interest for pedestrians. 6 Hotel rooms shall be accessed from an interior hallway. Hotel shall provide an onsite restaurant with table service provided primarily by waitperson, seating for at least thirty customers, and full menu service offering multiple entrees with on-site food preparation. Hotel shall provide conference facility space to accommodate a minimum of 1,000 people. Development shall be designed to create an outdoor pedestrian space(s) featuring amenities such as benches, outdoor dining, public art, gardens, courtyard, forecourt or a plaza. Building facades shall be articulated with wall offsets, recesses, opening, ornamentation, and colors and materials, to add texture with special detail to the streetscape. Pool and spa facilities are permitted on patios, balconies, or terraces located on the second floor or above when integrated into the building architecture and design. The project, as proposed, meets all the design criteria and development standards of the Hotel Overlay Zoning District. Project Design At the Planning Commission Meeting on May 15, 2024, the Planning Commission identified design concerns with the project and recommended that the applicant (1) relocate the pool to a location that provides engagement with Old Town, (2) provide additional horizontal and vertical articulation of the building, and (3) provide functioning balconies. The proposed project has addressed those design concerns in the following manner: Functioning Balconies The concerns of the Planning Commission has been addressed with the addition of functioning balconies for 65% of the guest rooms: o 3rd Floor - 56 of 72 guest rooms feature balconies or decks or, in the case of the pool and wedding areas, sliding doors that lead out to the amenity areas. o 4th Floor to 6th Floor – 45 of 72 guest rooms on each floor have balconies. o 7th Floor – 36 of 62 guest rooms have balconies or decks. In addition, the depth of the functioning balconies has been increased from 2’-6” to 4’-0”providing for additional outdoor area. Also, the rooms that do not contain functioning balconies provide smaller balconies or railings which gives guest the ability to open the sliding doors in the room. Location of the Pool The pool which had previously been located at the rear o f the building, adjacent to Interstate 15, has been relocated to the south side of the building at the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street. This will allow for more engagement with Old 7 Town, allows for the building massing along First Street to be greatly reduced, and opens up the corner of the building, moving the massing of the building away from Old Town Front Street and First Street. The design also provides for a much more inviting area of the building that will be the first thing that people see when entering the southern arch of Old Town. Building Articulation Decks have been added to the 7th floor of the building on Old Town Front Street, First Street, Second Street, and the elevations facing the existing Rodeway Inn. Where these decks are located it provides an additional setback of the building of four to six feet. As discussed above, the pool location changing from the rear of the building to the corner of Old Town Front Street and First Street results in pushing the massing of the building back approximately 45 feet on First Street for the majority of the building. The elevation along Old Town Front Street includes an approximately 3’-6” recess in the center of the building and an approximately 6’-0” recess at the location of the corner balconies. Additionally, including additional balconies and decks provides further building articulation to break up the wall planes. Landscaping The project provides the required street trees along with additional shrubs, accent plantings, and trees on the interior of the project including the pool area and wedding garden. All plant materials proposed are consistent with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map will allow for the conversion of ten existing parcels into a single parcel. The new parcel conforms to the Old Town Specific Plan, the City’s Development Code, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Subdivision Map Act. The parcel created meets the minimum parcel size requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. The minimum parcel size allowed in the Downtown Core/Hotel Overlay District is 3,500 square feet (0.08 acres). The proposed parcel is 2.15 acres. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on November 7, 2024, and mailed to the property owners within a 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The 8 project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located w ithin a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning district of th e Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore, the use is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Old Town Specific Plan as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. Additionally the project meets Policies 6.3 and 6.4 of the General Plan by expanding Old Town’s 9 role in local tourism by providing additional hotel rooms as well as providing lodging along the freeway. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in and around the site as the site exceeds the number of required parking spaces and adheres to the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Tentative Maps (Section 16.09.140) The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Parcel Map No. 38349 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, the Municipal Code, and the Old Town Specific Plan. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land, and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property that is suitable and designated for commercial development, which is consistent with the allowable land uses of the Old Town Specific Plan, General Plan, and Development Code. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project site is physically suitable to accommodate a hotel and the required parking to meet the needs of the hotel. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 10 The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. A Joint Projects Review #22-01-26-01 was completed for this project which determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and does not require for any acreage to be designated for conservation. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure compliance with the Building, Development, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions to ensure projects do not cause serious public health problems. Negative impacts are not anticipated. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). This map is for a non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. PC Resolution – Development Plan 3. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Development Plan 4. Exhibit B - Plan Reductions - Development Plan 5. PC Resolution – Tentative Parcel Map 6. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval - Tentative Parcel Map 7. Exhibit B - Plan Reductions – Tentative Parcel Map 8. Notice of Exemption 9. Notice of Public Hearing MERCEDES ST OLD TO W N FRONT ST THIRD ST FIRST ST SECOND ST Project Site CITY O F TEMEC ULA PA22-0035 0 200100 Feet\Date Created: 1/26/2022 1:1,4001 inch = 117 feet 922-072 -005 The map PA22-0035.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis !"#$15 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0035, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR AN APPROXIMATELY 285,125 SQUARE FOOT, 350 ROOM, SEVEN (7) STORY, FULL SERVICE HOTEL THAT INCLUDES AN APPROXIMATELY 174,382 SQUARE FOOT PARKING GARAGE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0035 a Development Plan. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0037 a Tentative Parcel Map. These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. On September 6, 2023, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. D. On May 15, 2024, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted for redesign of the project in order to further comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on November 20, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0035, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore, the use is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Old Town Specific Plan as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. Additionally the project meets Policies 6.3 and 6.4 of the General Plan by expanding Old Town’s role in local tourism by providing additional hotel rooms as well as providing lodging along the freeway. B. The overall development of the land not designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in and around the site as the site exceeds the number of required parking spaces and adheres to the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required util ities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plan Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of November, 2024. Bob Hagel, Chair ATTEST: Matt Peters Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of November, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Matt Peters Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22 -0035 A Development Plan for an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1st Street and 2nd Street. Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-072-005 922-072-007 922-072-010 922-072-011 922-072-013 922-072-016 922-072-018 922-072-020 922-072-021 922-072-023 Commercial MSHCP Category: Service Commercial DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Service Commercial/Office N/A (non -residential) November 20, 2024 November 20, 2027 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 22 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 22 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5). 5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 6. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 7. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 9. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Page 3 of 22 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Stucco White Duck (SW 7010) Stucco Pure White (SW 7005) Limestone Picard Jaune - Brushed Metal Railings & Canopies Rookwood Dark Brown (SW 2808) Moldings Double Latte (SW 9108) 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover or located indoors and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 16. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 17. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 18. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 19. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 20. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 21. Page 4 of 22 Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at their sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Community Development.” 22. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 23. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 24. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 25. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 26. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 27. Page 5 of 22 Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 28. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 29. Page 6 of 22 Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s). i. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find. ii. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources. iii. Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. iv. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non-Disclosure of Reburial Condition. v. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan. vi. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council. 30. Page 7 of 22 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property (as identified on Burial Area Exhibit). The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. 31. Archeology Report - Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report, if required, and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s). 32. Training Session. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified biologist shall conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The session shall meet the requirements of JPR #22-01-26-01." 33. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall provide evidence of compliance with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project Review letter (JPR# 22-01-26-01) dated May 24, 2022. 34. Page 8 of 22 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 35. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 36. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 37. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 38. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 39. Page 9 of 22 Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 40. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 41. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 42. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 43. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 44. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 45. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 46. Page 10 of 22 Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 47. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 48. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 49. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 50. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 51. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 52. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 53. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 54. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 55. Outside Agencies Page 11 of 22 Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated January 25, 2022, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 56. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Healths transmittal dated October 18, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 57. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated January 20, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 58. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District’s transmittal dated February 16, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 59. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated August 29, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 60. Compliance with Regional Conservation Authority. The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority's Joint Project Review letter (JPR# 22-01-26-01) dated May 24, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 61. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 62. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 63. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 64. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 65. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; and b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right-of-way 66. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 67. Page 12 of 22 Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 68. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 69. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as Caltrans and other affected agencies. 70. Right-of-Way Vacation. The Developer shall submit a Right-of-Way Vacation application to Public Works for review and approval. a. Old Town Front Street 71. Right-of-Way Dedication. The Developer shall submit a Right-of-Way Dedication application to Public Works for review and approval. a. Second Street 72. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 73. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 74. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 75. Page 13 of 22 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 76. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 77. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 78. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 79. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 80. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 81. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 82. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 83. Page 14 of 22 Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 84. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 85. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 86. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 87. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve First Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Second Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. Improve Old Town Front Street along property frontage - (Old Town Specific Plan Standard) to include installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, street trees and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 88. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 89. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 90. Right-of-Way Vacation. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall provide a copy of the recorded Right-of-Way Vacation. a. Old Town Front Street 91. Right-of-Way Dedication. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall provide a copy of the recorded Right-of-Way Dedication. a. Second Street 92. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Page 15 of 22 Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. Rehabilitation of street frontage shall be 4-inch asphalt concrete over class II base full-width curb-to-curb at the discretion of the City Engineer upon project completion. 93. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 94. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 95. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 96. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 97. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 98. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Including Section 1206 of the California Building Code. 99. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 100. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 101. Page 16 of 22 Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 102. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 103. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 104. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 105. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 106. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 107. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 108. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 109. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 110. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For this Commercial projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system to meet fire flow requirements. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants, public or private may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 111. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 112. Page 17 of 22 Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for this commercial project. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. For fire hydrants serving this property, any public fire hydrants will be required to meet the required fire flow if there are not enough designated private fire hydrants to meet this. 113. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have a clear unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and a clear unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. no equipment is able to or allowed to impede in the 24-feet fire lanes. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 114. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather paved surface roads, minimum of 24-feet in clear unobstructed width, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 115. Turning Radius. Minimum outside turning radius on any dead-end shall be 45 feet for commercial projects 116. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 117. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 118. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 119. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish an electronic submittal of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. the hydrants will be required to meet the fire flow requirements set forth in these conditions of approval. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued. 120. Page 18 of 22 Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing C-16 contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. If plans are not submitted by the actual installing C-16 contractor, then they will be required to be designed and submitted by a Fire Protection Engineer (FPE), no other engineer stamps will be accepted. Once the engineered plans are approved and a contract is awarded then the actual C-16 sprinkler contractor can be added to the permit. The C-16 contractor cannot make any changes to the approved engineered plans and will have to install the system based on the approved plans. Any changed to the approved engineered plans will require a re-submittal prior to moving forward with any inspections. These plans will be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits. 121. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted by the installing C-10 contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. If plans are not submitted by the actual installing C-10 contractor, then they will be required to be designed and submitted by a Fire Protection Engineer (FPE), no other engineer stamps will be accepted. Once the engineered plans are approved and a contract is awarded then the actual C-10 fire alarm contractor can be added to the permit. The C-10 contractor cannot make any changes to the approved engineered plans and will have to install the system based on the approved plans. Any changed to the approved engineered plans will require a re-submittal prior to moving forward with any inspections. The fire alarm system is also required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans will be required to be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits. 122. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with a Knox system. Gates will be required to have a key pad with electronic access as well as Opticom for emergency access by firefighting personnel. 123. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 124. Knox Box. A “Knox-Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height above finished floor and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room. This box will house all the keys for the facility (CFC Chapter 5). 125. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 126. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate fire lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 127. Additional Submittals (Fire Above/Below Ground Tanks). The developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining any underground and/or aboveground tank permits that will be installed and used onsite for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health Department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 57 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 128. Page 19 of 22 Additional Submittals (Hazardous Materials). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report. A full hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any building storing or using hazardous materials. If pool chemicals will be stored on site they will need to be disclosed in this package along with where they will be stored. (CFC Chapters 1 and 50 through 67 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 129. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. 130. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 131. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 132. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 133. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 134. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 135. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 136. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 137. Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 138. Page 20 of 22 Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 139. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 140. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 141. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 142. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 143. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 144. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens’ arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. 145. Compliance with State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 146. Inspections and Training. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. 147. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 148. Employee Training for Identification Checks. The applicant shall ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Office at (951) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training should be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training should be conducted when new employees/management are hired. 149. Identification Verification. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver’s license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card (active/reserve/retired/dependent); (d) valid driver’s license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. 150. Page 21 of 22 Acceptable Forms of Identification. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of business owners and any person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. 151. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 152. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 153. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 154. Page 22 of 22 JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 242043 January 25, 2022 City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 Attention: Scott Cooper Re: PA 22-0035, APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -018, -020, -021 and -023 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received January 19, 2022. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ☒ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, ________. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ☐ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. City of Temecula - 2 - January 25, 2022 Re: PA 22-0035, APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -018, -020, 242043 -021 and -023 ☒ This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (☐Murrieta Valley ☒ Temecula Valley ☐ Santa Gertrudis Valley ☐Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ☐ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, ____________________. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ☐ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy WMC:blm County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 ● RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 JEFF JOHNSON, DIRECTOR Office Locations ● Blythe ● Corona ● Hemet ● Indio ● Murrieta ● Palm Springs ● Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org October 18, 2022 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA – PA22-0035 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA DP (APN:922-072-005) Dear Mr. Cooper: The project listed in the subject heading is proposing a development plan to allow a full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a weddin garden. It will be located on the east side of Front Street between 1st and 2nd Street, in the city of Temecula. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s) listed in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER This project is proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. City of Temecula PA22-0035 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB) Prior to conducting a building permit final, the facility shall require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 358- 5055 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES – PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD/POOL FACILITY Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate food plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite “A” Murrieta CA 92563 Please contact your local DES office located in Murrieta at (951)461-0284. LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY (LEA) Any persons engaged in the business or performance of tattooing, body piercing, branding and the application of permanent cosmetics as defined in Health and Safety Code 119300 et sec. must obtain approval from the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health LEA. Contact the County of Riverside LEA at (951)955-8980 for any plan check and/or permitting requirements. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim@rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Program Chief Department of Environmental Health January 20, 2022 Scott Cooper City of Teme cula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Case No.: PA22-0035 – Temecula Resort & Spa DP APN: 922-072-005 Location: North corner of First St and Old Town Front St Description: A Development Plan for an approximately 474,137 square foot , seven story, 90 - foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants , bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden. Dear Scott Cooper: The subject project will require sewer service from EMWD, with the potential requirement for on-site and offsite facilities and associated easements to adequately serve the project demands from existing EMWD facilities. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD’s Design Conditions (DC), formerly known as Plan of Service (POS), to be developed by the project proponent. To that end, EMWD requires beginning dialogue with the project proponent at an early stage in site design and development, via a one-hour complimentary Due Diligence meeting. To set up this meeting, the project proponent should complete a Project Questionnaire (form NBD-058) and submit to EMWD. To download this form or for additional information, please visit our “New Development Process” web page, under the “Business” tab, at www.emwd.org. This meeting will offer the following benefits: 1. Describe EMWD’s development work-flow process 2. Identify project scope and parameters 3. Prelimin ary, high level review of the project within the context of existing infrastructure 4. Discuss potential candidacy for recycled water service Following the Due Diligence meeting, to proceed with this project, the Design Conditions (DC) will need to be developed by the developer’s engineer, and reviewed/approved by EMWD prior to submitting improvement plans for Plan Check. The DC process will provide the following: 1. Technical evaluation of the project’s preliminary design 2. Defined facility and easement requirements, i.e. approved DC 3. Potential facility oversizing and cost estimate of EMWD’s participation 4. Exception: for feasibility evaluation of purchase acquisition, only a conceptual facilities assessment may be developed. If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 928-3777, extension 4468 or by email at El-hagem@emwd.org. Sincerely, Maroun El-Hage, MPA, MS, PE Principal Civil Engineer Development Services Department Eastern Municipal Water District MEH:lm Attachment(s)/Enclosure(s): Copy of the Public Notice , EMWD Sewer & Easement Exhibit c: 564 2,257 Legend APN 922-072-005, -007, -010, -011, -013, -016, -020, -021, & -023 N CORNER OF FIRST ST & OLD TOWN FRONT ST IN TEMECULA Notes 1,876 Map Produced 01/20/2022 SCALE 1:GIS data shown is for informational purposes only, is subject to change without notice and may not be suitable for legal, engineering, construction, or surveying purposes. Information should be reviewed against reliable sources to ascertain its usability. Eastern Municipal Water District assumes no liability for any incorrect results, any lost profits and direct, special, indirect or consequential damages to any party, arising out of or in connection with the use or the inability to use the data hereon or the services. 0 469 Feet : EMWD StaffBy Temecula Resort & SPA DP © EMWD Swr Interagency Tie Swr Manhole Cleanout Manhole Monitoring Sampling Shallow Swr Main As Built, Collection As Built, Distribution As Built, Effluent Force As Built, Influent Force As Built, Transmission CIP, Collection CIP, Effluent Force CIP, Influent Force CIP, Transmission Swr Main Abandoned Swr Main Murrieta Streets Swr Lift Station Swr Lift Station Polygon Swr Treatment Plant EMWD District Boundary EMWD Main Office EMWD Sites Highway Easements Riverside County Parcel Labels Riverside County Parcel Polygons August 29, 2022 Project No. 11760.032 City of Temecula, Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review Comments #3 (Final) Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa (PA22-0035) 1st Street and Front Street, Temecula, California References: R.T. Frankian & Associates, Addendum to Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021- 011-001, dated April 13, 2022. R.T. Frankian & Associates, Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021-011-001, dated January 18, 2022. R.T. Frankian & Associates, Response to Geotechnical Peer Review #2, Proposed Temecula Resort and Spa, 1st Street & Old Town Front Street, Temecula, CA, Job No. 2021-011-01., dated June 24, 2022. In accordance with your request, we performed a peer review of the above referenced soils reports to confirm compliance with the requirements of the 2019 California Building Code, applicable Local and State technical guidelines, and standard of care typically used in this area and for this type of construction. Based on this review, the referenced geotechnical investigation report and subsequent clarifications/responses are considered adequate from a geotechnical design submittal perspective. Please note that our opinion/ peer review is to help the City in their review process of the submitted documents and the consultant remains solely responsible for their findings and recommendations. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Robert F. Riha, CEG Senior Principal Geologist Ext 8914 rriha@leightongroup.com Carlos Amante, PE, GE Principal Engineer Ext 1682 camante@leightongroup.com Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF copy via email) RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 1 Project Information Permittee: City of Temecula Case Information: PA22-0035/LR21-1000/Temecula Resort and Spa Site Acreage: 3.00 acres (2.81 acres of permanent impacts and 0.19 acre of temporary impacts) Portion of Site Proposed for MSHCP Conservation Area: 0 acres Criteria Consistency Review Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements with implementation of the measures presented in these Findings (including any within the project information provided to the Regional Conservation Authority by the Permittee for this JPR). Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed Linkage 10 Area Plan: Southwest Area APN Sub-Unit Cell Group Cell 922-072-005, 922-072-007*, 922-072-010, 922-072-011, 922-072-013, 922-072-016, 922-072-018, 922-072-020, 922-072-021, 922-072-022, 922-072-023, 922-075-001*, 922-360-002* SU1 – Murrieta Creek N/A 7166 Project Information a. Project Documentation. JPR submittal materials provided by the Permittee included a JPR Application Form (January 3, 2022), a General Biological Assessment and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Report (Report) prepared by Hernandez Environmental Services (May 2022), a City of Temecula Transmittal Worksheet (January 7, 2022), a City of Temecula Conformance Memo (March 31, 2022), a City of Temecula HANS Application (March 11, 2022) a Site Plan (November 5, 2021), GIS Shape Files (January 18, 2022), and a HANS Consistency Report prepared by Hernandez Environmental Services (March 31, 2022). * Denotes APNs that are partially impacted. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 2 b. Project Location. The proposed project site is located within the City of Temecula, adjacent to Old Town Front Street, west of 1st Street, and east of 2nd Street. The center point latitude and longitude for the project site are 33°29’31.8794” North and 117°08’45.7552” West (Exhibit A). The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the MSHCP Area (Exhibit B). c. Project Description. The 3.00-acre project proposes the development of an approximately 474,137 square- foot, seven story, 90-foot high, full-service hotel that includes the following: a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full-service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden. The proposed project contains 0.19 acre of temporary impacts, including staging areas, and 2.81 acres of permanent impacts. All construction staging areas will occur within the 3.00-acre development. The proposed project does not include fuel modification zones, detention basins, or other water quality features. No conservation or avoidance areas are proposed as part of the project (Exhibit E). According to the Report, the site is currently being used as a public parking lot (comprised of compacted gravel and some paved areas). The surrounding land uses include existing industrial development to the south, east, and west, and Interstate 15 Freeway to the north. The property is relatively flat with elevations ranging from 977 to 1017 feet above sea level. The vegetation on the site consists entirely of disturbed habitat. Soils within the project site consist of three soil types, 1.) Chino silt loam, drained, 2.) Chino silt loam, drained, saline-alkali, and 3.) Hanford coarse sandy loam. None of these soils are directly related to or support NEPSSA, CASSA, Delhi Sands Flower-loving Fly, or other sensitive species (Exhibit D). Relation to Reserve Assembly a. Reserve Assembly Summary. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, “Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 consists of Murrieta Creek, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. This Constrained Linkage connects Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Proposed Linkage 10 in the south. This Linkage is constrained along most of its length by existing urban Development and agricultural use and the planned land use surrounding the Linkage consists of city (Murrieta and Temecula). Therefore, care must be taken to maintain high quality riparian Habitat within the Linkage and along the edges for species such as yellow warbler, yellow-breasted chat, and least Bell's vireo, which have key populations located in or along the creek. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also important to western pond turtle and arroyo chub in this area. Guidelines Pertaining to Urban/Wildlands Interface for the management of edge factors such as lighting, urban runoff, toxics, and domestic predators are presented in Section 6.1.4 of this document [MSHCP].” “Proposed Linkage 10 consists of an upland connection in the southwest region of the Plan Area extending from Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Existing Core G (Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve) in the south. Private lands compose the entirety of the Linkage, which RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 3 consists of upland Habitat complementary to the riparian Linkage provided between these two Cores by Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 (Murrieta Creek). This Linkage, which is only somewhat constrained by existing urban Development, provides for movement between these two Cores for species such as bobcat and mountain lion. Although the Linkage is somewhat lengthy at 5.5 miles, it is also nearly a mile wide and thus provides Live-In Habitat for many species. Surrounding planned land uses are approximately evenly divided between Rural Mountainous and city (Murrieta, Temecula). In areas of the Linkage bordering Cities, treatment of edge conditions will be necessary to maintain the proper Habitat and movement functions of the Linkage.” The project site is located within Cell 7166, independent of a Cell Group. As stated in Section 3.3.15 of the MSHCP, “Conservation within this Cell will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 and Proposed Linkage 10. Conservation within this Cell will focus on riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat along Murrieta Creek and on additional chaparral habitat within the Cell. Areas conserved within this Cell will be connected to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7079 to the north, to chaparral, grassland, riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7264 to the south and to chaparral habitat proposed for conservation in Cell #7164 to the west. Conservation within this Cell will range from 35%-45% of the Cell focusing in the southwestern portion of the Cell.” Cell 7166 totals approximately 139 acres. Using the mid-range (40%) conservation goal, approximately 56 acres are described for conservation within this approximate 139-acre Cell. To date, 129.4 acres have been developed or are approved for development in this Cell, which includes the 3.00-acre proposed project acreage and 18.2 acres of covered roads acreage. With no lands conserved to date, approximately 56 acres are still needed for conservation in order to achieve the mid-range goal of 56 acres. There are approximately 9.6 undeveloped acres available within the Cell, of which approximately 9.0 acres are potentially available within areas described for conservation (specifically Proposed Constrained Linkage 13). In summary, with no lands conserved to date and 9.0 undeveloped acres available for conservation that could also functionally contribute to PCL-13, Cell 7166 could not achieve the mid-range goal of 56 acres or the low-range goal of 49 acres, meaning that it is not possible for this Cell to achieve its Reserve Assembly goal. However, the proposed project is located within the northeastern corner of the Cell, outside of the area described for conservation. More importantly, the project site is surrounded by development on all sides, and conservation of this site would not functionally contribute to the conservation of Proposed Constrained Linkage-13 (Murrieta Creek) or Proposed Linkage 10. While Cell 7166 cannot achieve its conservation goal, conservation of the proposed project would not provide any biological resource function or value, nor impede the conservation goals for Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 nor Proposed Linkage 10, nor result in issues regarding fragmentation. b. Rough Step. The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 5. As stated in Section 4 of the MSHCP 2020 Annual Report, “Rough Step Unit 5 encompasses 91,734 acres within the southwestern corner of western RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 4 Riverside County and includes the Santa Rosa Plateau, the Tenaja Corridor, and Murrieta Creek (see Figure 4- 6, Rough Step Unit #5). This Unit is bound by Interstate 15 to the east, San Diego County to the south, and the Santa Ana Mountains in the Cleveland National Forest to the west and north. Only that portion within Criteria Cells is tracked by Rough Step and not all vegetation or land cover within a Rough Step Unit has acreage goals. In Rough Step Unit 5 there are 10 vegetation/land cover types, but only five have Rough Step acreage goals; coastal sage scrub; grasslands; riparian scrub, woodland, forest; Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub; and woodlands and forests. Table 4-8, Rough Step Unit 5 Acreage Totals provides the losses and gains and resulting allowable development acreage for each of the five vegetation communities with acreage goals. Through 2020, a total of 534 acres of conservation has occurred for the five tracked vegetation communities within Rough Step Unit 5. Losses to this unit total 934 acres, with remaining development allowance as followed: 185 acres of coastal sage scrub, 150 acres of grasslands, 8 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub, and 212 acres of woodlands and forests. The riparian scrub, woodland, forest vegetation category is out of rough step by 0.39 acre. The RCA is actively engaged in acquiring parcels that would bring riparian scrub, woodland, forest back into Rough Step for Unit 5. The total acreage needed is 2.23 acres of riparian scrub, woodland, forest.” Baseline vegetation (1994) for the area of the proposed project site located within Criteria Cell 7166 consists of grassland and developed or disturbed land. Developed or disturbed land is not tracked for Rough Step. Based on the above discussion, the grasslands portion of the project site does not conflict with Rough Step (Exhibit C). The Rough Step Unit 5 development allowance may have changed by the time this project submits for a grading permit. As such, the RCA provides the following required Measure to ensure the City does not exceed Rough Step allowances: ROUGH STEP MEASURE. In accordance with MSHCP Volume I, Section 6.7, it is the Permittees responsibility that [i]f the rough step rule is not met during any analysis period (performed annually by the Regional Conservation Authority [RCA]), the Permittees must conserve appropriate lands supporting a specified vegetation community within the analysis unit to bring the Plan back into the parameters of the rule prior to authorizing additional loss of the vegetation community for which the rule was not achieved. The Permittee is encouraged to consult with the RCA on current rough step allowances prior to working with project applicants developing grading plans. The Permittee must not cause additional loss of any rough step vegetation that is out of balance. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Permittee will confirm with the RCA that the Project will not impact out-of-balance Rough Step vegetation in the applicable Rough Step unit. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 5 Other Plan Requirements (MSHCP Volume I) Section 6.1.2 – Was Riparian/Riverine/Vernal Pool Mapping or Information Provided? Yes. There are no Riparian/Riverine areas on the project site. There are no vernal pools on the project site, and the soils and topography present on the site do not support habitat considered suitable for fairy shrimp. There is no suitable riparian bird habitat on the project site. Section 6.1.3 – Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area. Section 6.3.2 – Was Additional Survey Information Provided? Yes. The project site is not located in a Criteria Area Species Survey Area for plants. The project site is not located in Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Areas for amphibians or small mammals. The project site does not support Delhi sands (Exhibit D) or in areas that would trigger additional review for Delhi sands flower-loving fly. However, the project site is located in an Additional Survey Needs and Procedures Area for burrowing owl. Section 6.1.4 – Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided? Yes. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. Comments on Other Plan Requirements: a. Section 6.1.2. The following discusses each requirement under this policy. Riparian/Riverine. The project site was assessed on October 8, 2021 to determine the presence/absence of riparian/riverine features. The project consists of disturbed land and there were no riparian/riverine features within nor adjacent to the project site. Vernal Pools/Fairy Shrimp. The project site lacks topography and vegetation to support vernal pools. The proposed project site does not contain evidence of ponded water, seasonally inundated road ruts nor other seasonally-inundated depressions exhibiting cracked soils. Historical aerial images revealed that areas within the project site tended to hold water more in February 2016, October 2016 and January 2020; however, site visits conducted in October 2021 and May 2022 showed no evidence of this. Furthermore, during the site visit in May 2022, it was found the site had been further disturbed and is currently being used as a public parking lot (see photos in Report, Appendix C). The areas where puddles/ponded water occurred in historical aerial images have been paved over or are now covered in gravel and are continually impacted by the frequent use of motor vehicles on the site. Finally, no clay soils or heavy soils were mapped within the project site. Due to the lack of vernal pools and/or other conditions suitable for fairy shrimp, focused surveys for fairy shrimp were not conducted for this project. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 6 Riparian Birds. No suitable riparian habitat was found on site that would support riparian birds, including least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, and western yellow-billed cuckoo. Therefore, no focused riparian bird surveys were conducted. Based on the information provided in the Report , the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. b. Section 6.1.3 NEPSSA Plants. Based on the information provided in the Report, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.1.3 of the MSHCP. c. Section 6.3.2. Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. The following describes Additional Survey Needs and Procedures applicable to the proposed project: CASSA Plants. The project site is not located within a CASSA Plants survey area; therefore, focused CASSA Plant surveys were not conducted for this project. Burrowing Owl. The project site is located within a burrowing owl survey area. A Step 1 habitat assessment and a Step II-A focused burrow survey were conducted concurrently on October 8, 2021. According to the Report, the project site does not provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl due to the heavily compacted soils and a lack of ground squirrel burrows or constructed structures that could function as burrow surrogates. Therefore, it was determined that suitable habitat for burrowing owl was not present and Step II-B surveys were not conducted. The project site was revisited in May 2022 and revealed the site had undergone further disturbance and is now being actively used as a public parking lot. The project site appears to have been recently partially paved and had gravel and parking lines painted on it. Based on the information provided by in the Report, the project demonstrates consistency with Section 6.3.2 of the MSHCP. d. Section 6.1.4. Urban/Wildlands Interface Guidelines. Although the project site is not adjacent to or connected to any MSHCP Conservation Areas, the guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 related to controlling adverse effects for development adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area should be considered by the Permittee in their actions relative to the project. However, the following guidelines may still apply during project construction. Therefore, the Permittee should consider the following measures as project conditions of approval, as applicable: SECTION 6.1.4 MEASURE. i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Co nservation Areas. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to prevent the release of toxins, chemicals, petroleum products, exotic plant materials, or other elements that might degrade or harm downstream biological resources or ecosystems. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 7 ii. Land uses proposed in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area that use chemicals or generate bioproducts, such as manure, that are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, Habitat, or water quality shall incorporate measures to ensure that application of such chemicals does not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest risk is from landscaping fertilization overspray and runoff. iii. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area and the avoided are a on site to protect species from direct night lighting. iv. Proposed noise-generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas, shall incorporate setbacks, berms, or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations, and guidelines related to land use noise standards. v. Avoid use of invasive, non-native plant species listed in Table 6-2 of the MSHCP in approving landscape plans for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area, including avoidance areas. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas and designated avoidance areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls, topography, and other features. vi. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate, in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass, or dumping into existing and future MSHCP Conservation Areas. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage, and/or other appropriate mechanisms. vii. Manufactured slopes associated with proposed site development shall not extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. viii. Weed abatement and fuel modification activities are not permitted in the Conservation Area, including designated avoidance areas. c. Appendix C. The following best management practices (BMPs), as applicable, shall be implemented for the duration of construction: APPENDIX C MEASURE. i. A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 8 being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished. ii. Water pollution and erosion control plans shall be developed and implemented in accordance with RWQCB requirements. iii. The footprint of disturbance shall be minimized to the maximum extent feasible. Access to sites shall be via pre-existing access routes to the greatest extent possible. iv. The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral l imits of disturbance on either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by the biologist prior to initiation of work. v. Projects should be designed to avoid the placement of equipment and personnel within the stream channel or on sand and gravel bars, banks, and adjacent upland habitats used by target species of concern. vi. Projects that cannot be conducted without placing equipment or personnel in sensitive habitats should be timed to avoid the breeding season of ripari an species identified in MSHCP Global Species Objective No. 7. vii. When stream flows must be diverted, the diversions shall be conducted using sandbags or other methods requiring minimal instream impacts. Silt fencing of other sediment trapping materials shall be installed at the downstream end of construction activity to minimize the transport of sediments off site. Settling ponds where sediment is collected shall be cleaned out in a manner that prevents the sediment from reentering the stream. Care shall be exercised when removing silt fences, as feasible, to prevent debris or sediment from returning to the stream. viii. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFG [CDFW], RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas. ix. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other similar debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks. x. The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 9 xi. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and min imized to the maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species. xii. Exotic species that prey upon or displace target species of concern should be permanently removed from the site to the extent feasible. xiii. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s). xiv. Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area nec essary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction plans. Construction limits will be fenced with orange snow screen. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas. xv. The Permittee shall have the right to access and inspect any sites of approved projects including any restoration/enhancement area for compliance with project approval conditions, including these BMPs. RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Findings JPR #: 22-01-26-01 Date: 05/24/22 10 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Rough Step 5 Rough Step 6 VIATORNADO VI A S ANTA ROS A AVENIDADELOR O VENE T O D R NI B LICKRD SUNS E T TER J E D E DIA H SMITHRD EVALLEJOAVE DE PORTOLA R D VIA G O R RI O N RAN CH O C A L I F O R N I A R D S A N TI A G O R D C ALLEESCADERA PASEO G O L E T A MERCEDES ST PAU B A R D HONORSDR CST SIXTH ST S TR A W B E R R Y T R E E LN MARGARITARD YNEZRD DIAZ R D D A V I D L N LO M A LIN D A R D I- 1 5 S B O N VIAPUESTA DE L S O L I R O N CIR L I N K S C T VIA S A N C A R L OS AVENID A D E L A R EI N A TEMEKU D R MIRAL O M A D R O L D T O W N F R O N T ST CORTE C ABRERA DRIVERLN SH-79 F E L IX V A L D E Z AVE LOLITA RD V I A R A M I MORENORD R A N C H O VIS TA RD VI A L U C I D O CALLEH A L CON VIA C AMPANA RI O A S T E R O I D W AY C O L I NAVERDE A R B O R L N CAL A CARRAS C O SO U T H E R N C R O S S RD PREECELN BUCKE Y E R D CA L L E A R A G O N S PICAC T P A S E O D E L A S OLAS C A LLEREDONDELA VIA ELGRECO T E M E C U L A P K W Y C L O V E R L N B R A S S I E L N V I LLAALT U R ASD R S A N T A C E CILIADR YUKON RD PUJOL ST C O S M IC DR FIFTH ST HU M B E R D R C ORTE A L M O N T E C O R TE R O S A RI O ORMSBY RD CUPENOLN RIDGE P A R K D R CO RTESAGUNTO P E C H A NGAPKWY FOURTH ST CALLEREVA CALLE N O V ELDA LAPAZST MAIN ST CAL L E N A CID O E L I N D A RD V I A B A R R O Z O C AL L E C U E S T A TI E R RA VI S TA RD C O R T E FRESCA JOHN WARNER RD BUSIN E S S P ARKDR NORTHGATE AVE V I A R I O T E M E C U L A VIAPEREGRINO B UTTERNUTDR JERAMIE DR BUNKER D R VIAVAQUERORD DIAZ RD VIAIND U S T RIA MILKYW A Y D R I - 1 5 S B O FF A GENA S T WINC H E S T E R R D YORBAAVE F L O R E S D R THIRD ST T A Y L O R L N SECOND ST IRONBARKCT I - 1 5 N B O F F VAR D ONDR C ORTE P O L LENSA PIOPICORD RIO NEDO V I A GAN D I A S Y C A M O R E M E S A R D AMAR I T A W A Y FIRST S T I-15 C ORT E S O NORA VIARENAISSANCE M O R A G A R D ROANOAKEST VIA HORCA COR T E RIALTO MARGARITARD VIAMONTEZUMA CABRILLOAVE C O R T E A R R O Y O VISTAD E L R I O R D C A L L E C E R R I L L O P E C H A N G A D R LYNDIEL N J E F F E R S O N A V E L ON G VALLEY DR CRYSTALAI RE D R C A M I N O E S T R I B O VALLEJOAV E AVENIDA ALVARADO MANZANODR CA L L E VISTAL E J OS S AMANTHALN VIATAFALLA RANC H O HIGHLANDDR PIAS A N O PL V I A C E JITA C O R T E A N Z A CALLEDEVELARDO ROICK DR P E S C A D O DR PIO PIC ORD W HIS P E RLN MOONTI D E CT C O R T E T A L V E R A S A N F ER MIN P L P ARKPLAZ A L N SARAH WAY B O R E A LI S D R C O R TESALIN A S CORTE P A D R E RA S I N GLE OAK D R VIA L A S C O LI N AS R A NCHO WAY I-15 SB O N I - 1 5 S B O F F I- 1 5 N B O N I- 1 5 N B O N I -1 5 N B O F F Z E V O D R CAMINOGATILLO RANCHO MESA RD City ofTemecula 7356 7252 7258 7005 7075 7078 7359 7021 6890 7352 7079 7166 6891 0 7076 7357 6888 7264 7077 7358 71647158 7254 0 7355 7161 7008 I SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2022; County of Riverside 2022; Esri Basemap 2022. Map created on 5/19/2022. JPR Project Boundary Temporary Impact Proposed Development Proposed Public Project Proposed MSHCP Conservation Avoidance Area Abandoned JPR RCA MSHCP Conserved Land RCA Conservation Easement Public/Quasi-Public Conserved Land WRC Non RCA Conservation Easement MSCHP Covered Road Rough Step Unit Criteria Cell City Boundary Parcel Boundary Centerline EXHIBIT AJPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Regional01,000 2,000Feet OrangeCounty San DiegoCounty San Bernardino County EasternRiversideCounty WesternRiversideCounty r14488Permittee: City of Temecula G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22012601\JPR22012601-ExhibitA_Regional.mxd 7166 FIRST ST SECOND ST I-1 5 MERCEDES ST OLD TOWN FRONT ST I-1 5 0 100 200Feet !!! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! !! ! !! !!! !! ! !!! ·|}þ17 !"#$51 !"#$51 !"#$51 !"#$512 ·|}þ06 !"#$10 !"#$10 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ247 ·|}þ243 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ19 ·|}þ19 !"#$51 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ97 ·|}þ06 ·|}þ173 ·|}þ47 ·|}þ243 ·|}þ97 !"#$512 !"#$512 ·|}þ06 ·|}þ97 ·|}þ47 !"#$51 16 20 3 21 65 8 1 15 6 6 20 18 1 14 8 4 5 21 179 7 1 21 22 10 15 11 14 4 11 1 17 13 11 24 19 18 14 7 7 16 9 12 10 12 3 4 23 13 8 D D K B EB EA L MA I A A B A K C F A LG H D J B K C B B C 1 2 3 4 3 5 4 7 1 2 6 1 2 4 7 65 3 5 6 7 7 JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Vicinity Map with MSHCP Schematic Cores and Linkages Proposed Linkages: Constrained Linkage Linkage !!!!!Existing Channel Existing Cores & Linkages: Constrained Linkage Core Linkage Noncontiguous Habitat Block Proposed Cores & Habitat Blocks: Core Proposed Extension of Existing Cores Noncontiguous Habitat Block EXHIBIT B SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (WRC-RCA). Map created on 2/1/2022 I 0 2 4Miles r14488Permittee: City of Temecula G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22012601\JPR22012601-ExhibitB_MSHCP_SchematicCoresLinkages.mxd !(^JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 C A LLE N A CID O MERCEDES ST OLD TOWN FRONT ST CORTE COPA MAIN ST V I A F A N I T A C O R T E RIALTO FIRST ST THIRD ST SANTIAGORD SECOND ST 7166 JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - VegetationEXHIBIT C SOURCE: WRC-RCA MSHCP Baseline Vegetation (1994). Map created on 5/19/2022. I 0 75 150Feet r14488Permittee: City of Temecula JPR Project BoundaryTemporary ImpactVegetation Types Coastal Sage ScrubDeveloped or Disturbed LandGrasslandRiparian Scrub, Woodland, ForestCriteria CellHighwayCenterline G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22012601\JPR22012601-ExhibitC_Vegetation.mxd §¨¦15 C A LLE N A CID O MERCEDES ST OLD TOWN FRONT ST CORTE COPA MAIN ST V I A F A N I T A C O R T E RIALTO FIRST ST THIRD ST SANTIAGORD SECOND ST 7166 JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Soil JPR Project BoundaryTemporary ImpactSoil Types Arbuckle gravelly loam, 2 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedArlington and Greenfield fine sandy loams, 8 to 15 percent slopes, erodedChino silt loam, drainedChino silt loam, drained, saline-alkaliDomino silt loam, saline-alkaliGarretson very fine sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesGreenfield sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, erodedHanford coarse sandy loam, 2 to 8 percent slopesRamona and Buren sandy loams, 15 to 25 percent slopes, severely erodedRamona sandy loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes, erodedRiverwashCriteria CellHighwayCenterline EXHIBIT DI070140Feet r14488Permittee: City of Temecula SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2020; County of Riverside 2020; USDA/NRCS Soils 2017 G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22012601\JPR22012601-ExhibitD_Soil.mxd City ofTemecula Rough Step 5 SANTIAGO RD MAIN ST OLD TOWN FRONT ST C O RTE RIALTO CORTE COPA C A LLE N A CID O MERCEDES ST THIRD ST SECOND ST F I R S T S T 7166 §¨¦15 JPR Log No. 22-01-26-01 - Conservation and Avoidance Areas JPR Project BoundaryPermanent Impact (2.81 ac.)Temporary Impact (0.19 ac.) MSCHP Covered RoadCriteria CellCity BoundaryParcel BoundaryHighwayCenterline EXHIBIT E G:\RCA\JOINT_PROJECT_REVIEW\JPR_FILES_2022\JPR22012601\JPR22012601-ExhibitE_ConservationAvoidance.mxd I 0 75 150Feet r14488Permittee: City of Temecula SOURCE: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 2022; County of Riverside 2022; Esri Basemap 2022. Map created on 5/19/2022. NO PROPOSED AVOIDANCE OR CONSERVATION AREAS =I sog? xoso o I I n I l 1 m' m m m m VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAM '&vq^6 SHEET INDEX .0 !9, ffi dULENGINEEF: VALUEO ENdNEERINS INC. 6M N. MOUNTdN AWNUE, rc102 o #*,SWEY.KTUUNGNUST 3735 WtSHFe 8oUtflARO t22: 1LS ANGELES, CA SO' O. PHoNE:Cl3)70H4 A1 - SITE PLANS & DATA A1,1 SITEPLAN A2- FLOOR PNS P.1 81 LEVEL AASEIVENT FLOOR PLANA2.2 GROUNDFLOORPN(11F1) tr.3 2ND FLOOR PN ( L2F2)P.4 P3 TfVEL PARKING FLOOR PUN42.5 3RDFLOORPLN(PODIUMLEVEL) tr.6 TYptcAL FLOOR pN (4TH_7TH FLOOR)tr.7 7TH FLOOR PUN A2.8 ROOF FLOOR PN A3. BUJLDING ELEVANONS A$DETAILS 45.1 ENLARGED DETAL$ lSTAND 2ND STREETA5.2 ENURGEDDETAILSFRONT STREETA5.3 EXTERIOR WALL OPENING CALCUUNON DIAGRN 46, RENDERINGS A6.1 3DRENDERINGS .te..,r : o'' ' _ _ -_ tc ? '. t "9- . -9 g.,'- iq * -.. j CffiACA JEFT MEER. CE s 1.- ?s i:PRdECT NcHlEcIi 99 dEsToP oEstoN, tNc. S3OWLSHIRE6LW,IG ANGELES, dMIO PndE: (213)3M452 CONIACT: ANmEWH, Kt {A, LEEOAP GNNilEARcHIEdi PHdE: ($2)s$m CNACT SERENA SUN SNUCilRAT ENGINEER: PROJECT LOCATION MECHANEA. EECNIdL T PTUMAINC ENGINEER: .c9 A3.1 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION-OVERALLtr.2 EXTERIOR BUILDING ELEVATION - OVERALL A4 - BUIDING SECNONS 0'M.2 A4.3 .: 9 -9 9 LEE T LEE SNUCruW ENGINEERNC INC.$9MLSHnE B[VD..g30 LGANCELES, S,gSIO PHNE: (213)351{04 mNTAd: SNG LEE, SE l{N@E.lNC, 5??'WST4NRURY ELb.,'1110 !6 NGETES, CA M6 BUILDING SECTIONS BUILDING SFCTIONS BUILDING SECTIONS re.2 46.3 A6-4 3D RENDERINGS 3D RENDERINGS 3D RENDERINGS orvEsroP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530WLSHIRE BLVD il310 IOS ANGELES CA 9OOIO SAD& U E-irq 'j =c+] ct)FFI]& OlhN o) U <J =Ur! tfJF FlrJt! d.Ftll Fzod,u- E MNMffiffi 12-2U2W PA22-0035 & PA22.OO37 - REVISIONS ruNNG SuilIfllTO sruE: 12" = 1t9" MNING SUBMIMJ 6.WSEDwm3 UNING SBMIMT 7-WEEO chcd ry &d No. COVER SHEET P - A0.1 =l d* NoNo o SITE LOCATION EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET EETVI/EEN 1ST STREET AND 2ND STREET LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS 1 THRU 24, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 17, MAP OF TEMECULA PER M.B. 15, PAGE 726, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CIry OF TEi'ECULA, COUNry OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING VACATED ALLEYWAY, BLOCK 17 AND PORTIONS OF VACATED FRONi STREET AND IVERCEDES STREET, APNtPA22-0035t 922-072.005, -O07, -010, -01 1, -013, _016, _0.18, _020, -02'1, and -023 OCCUPANCY R-1, S;2, B/M, A-2, A-3 PROPOSED USE HOTEL (350 GUESTROOMS), RETAIL, RESTAURANT, SPA, PARKING ZONING OLD TO![N SPECIFIC PTAN GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN ll\i|PLEMENTAT|ON EXISTING LAND USE VACANT LOT TYPE OF CONSTRUC'I'ION ryPE I-A & ryPE II-A FIRE SPRINKLERS FULLY FIRE SPRINKLERED THROUGHOUT UTILITY PURVEYORS SANITARYSEVVER EMWD POTABLEWATER RANCHOWATERELECTRICIry SOCALEDISONTELEPHONE FRONTIER 46,470 46,470 46,470 46,924 26,806 26,963 TOTAL OF (R-1) & ($1): 459,507 Se.FT FLOOR AREA dNEdrNGroqs^G -\L6 L5 L4 L1 P3 P2 P1 39,477 46,347 47,405 2,312 776 rNt9 v2 6'a llt o-ooOr€o1e a= zti 8-Qn^- -!OE42 6m N z2 a o-g Io =2 aTm =o !Iz MEETING SPACES GRAND BALLROOM (11) BANOUET LOUNGE (11) JUNIOR BALLROOM (12) rlTEETtNG ROOMS (12) SQFT 2,88'l 2,538 t(; s LOT DATA TOTAL GROSS AREA: 93,523 SQFT TOTAL NET AREAj 93,022 SQFT TOTAL BLDG AREA: 285,125 SQFT FLOOR AREA RATIO(S): 3.05 TOTAL 8,507 SQ.FT. * NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHICH THE PROJECT ACCOMODATES FOR CONFERENCE FACILITY SPACE: 8.507 SO.FT. = 1,215 OCCUpANTS 7 SQ.FT. PER PERSON (OCCUPANCY LOAD FACTOR FOR ASSEMBLY USE) PARKING @ 3?e 1 STALL PER GUEST ROOIV X 350 GUEST ROOMS 350 No. OF ToTAL PROVIDED PARK|NG spACEs: lS0 90 380 - VALLET SERVICE IS PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES 2.15 ACRES 2.1,f ACRES PERCENTAGE 241 zo Ca !1r oo =z ^{{z oonI Ioim-o mnt aIonm LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREA: PARKING AREA: LANDSCAPING AREA: HARDSCAPE: SQFT 74,682 0 0 '18,841 80% oo/o ovo 200/" @131(PER 2022 CALGREEN CIDE}-EVREADY 72aTmIn 6 T Fz onm oo zj -EV CAPABLE .EV CHARGERS 95 IVOTORCYCLE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED NO. 7 PROVIDED NO. 8 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES REQI.JIRED NO, 20 PROVIDED NO. 24 SIABET SEVEN STORIES OVER 1 LEVEL BASEMENT (ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES IS 8 STORIES) BUILOING HEIGHT 93' - 8' FEET FROIU FROMT STREET ENTRANCE TO TOP OF STAIR SHAFTS (ROOF ACCESS) ALLOWABLE BLDG HT IS NO MORE THAN 1OO'- O' PER OLD TOW\ SPECIFIC PLAN) KEYNOTES GTE UTILIry EASEMENT LOCATION. SEE ALTA SURVEY4. ALTA EASEMENTS FOR RECORO REFERENCE.HMAR MEDIA MAINTENANCE EASEMENT IOCATION. SEE ALTA SURVEY4.ALTA EASEMENTS FOR RECORO REFERENCE,TREES TO BE IMPLANTEO PER OLD TOM STREET IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS. SEE UNDSCAPING FSN FOR DETALS,DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY(DCDA) BY RANCHOWATER DISTRICT Drc ilRW2O, EXISJING POMRPOLE TO BE REMOVED. OVERHEAD TINE TO BE UNDERGROUNOEO. NEWSTREET LIGHT PER OID TOM SPECIFIC PLAN. SEE PHOTOMETRIC STUOY FOR DETALS. EXISTING EILLBOARO. l.PHASE TRANSFORMER FOR RODEWAY INN EXISTING FIRE HYOMNTS NEWFIRE HYDRANT"SUPER' NEWROAO SURFACE PER CIryOF TEMECULASTANOARO DETAIL,!04- PLEA6E SEE GRADING PUN FOR DETAILS,AOA ROUTE. ACCESSIBLE RAMPS FROM IST STREET AND 2ND ST. EXISTING TEMECUhSIGN EXISTING FLAGPOLETO BE PROTECTED PROPOSED DROP INIET STRUCTUREWTHIN CITY RIGHT.OF-WAYTO CAPTURE CNTRANS DRAINAGE EXISTING TREEWLI KOX BOX PROTECTION BOIURDS EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVEO IRRIGATION WATER METER & SACf LOW PREVENTOR PROPOSED SCREEN WALI STORM DRAN EASIN PROPOSED DROP INLET IN RISBON GUNER FIRE WATER DCDA & FDC OOMESTIC WATER METER & BACKFTOWPREVENTOR 23 39 NO. OF PROVIDED EVPARKING 1.i!4 aI @Inmm+ 39 Nzoa+nmmI i5 zAt @ Ytll m oll o 5ll g "-.ll15ll s 6llz rillo allO Tll d?l EEI# oi F L s01 s02 ss sg s05 sm s@ SG s10 s14 s15 s15 s17 s18 s19 s?0 s21 s22 s?4 s25 s2€ sn s2a s2 ss 3/&' s01 s02 s0 LEVEL) P{.5 (STREET s6 s18 s6 ss s24 el el el el *l rl rl el a a P2 (STREET EVEL) s03 E] P P sm *Y I rl lfi l; lr SB I )l I @ ss @ E @ B st5 P1 (STREET , LEVEL) s13 s@ s03 s03a ss s14 st5 sl6 L1 ET '="'.m] L -Nlooz 3o ITI O oEOrrici 911 -Zae=H E8g l#o<tT Fz a ^.ENTMNCE st7 s20 s18 s16 s10 83 33 ao o 39 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET owtsroP ONESTOP OESIGN INC. 3$O WLSHIRE BLVD f31O tos ANGETES CA 90010 PA22-0035 & PA22-O037 f\ Ol h f\l O) U <JfUl! =t!F Ft!t!d,F v1 Fzod,r SilD&UL-rrt i) FHFrI]& UNING suMfr[' 5. RtrsEO 12-2t2W REVISIONS ruNtNG SU8Mtrut 6 ruNNGS6MMI6.WSED UNMNG Sffifr[t 7-WSED DEm By Chckd By qd No. SIIE PLAN silE: As indi€ted P-A1.1 t, t tt ,t tt , ,t ,, ,t ,, J BASEMENT PLAN - PARKING LEVEL 81 SCALE 1/16" = 110" REF N 0' 8' 16,32'64' J a.-Fl5+ It+ tffi --]Jfr------_________ =i lfE IE ItF tlE I [Fi __lj4 tr# _--UH oo -GHrn.t +I lHi --?--\- on €sroP ONESTOP DESIGN INC- LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O N O)h O) U <J fUu.l [tF FIJ lrJ d.Fttt Fzod,lr saD&Ur- lJ] ') F1 6Fr!& PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 UNING SU8MMI6. EVISEDg-2023 ruNNtNGSwtntil 7- &V|SED ,282023 ruNNING SWilIMI5- WSED 12-2v202 REVISIONS fuNMNG SUBMIfrI J 6 Gd No. 81 LEVEL BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN silE: 1/16" = 1'-O" =c @rt @q? N N E b P - A2.1 FIRST STREET __v____ rEr l+t oumoFsmNG A@v s = 8 I E ri F TJJ TUEFa Fz.o E.lL _____J GROUND FLOOR PLAN 1tP1 . OVERALL SCALE L0'N REF. N 0' 8' 16'64' a STANON El@ sEc!&w Kr@f H ffi ._.j+s"@** @ E LUGGAGE slouGE IUGGAGE COUNIER STOMGE SNOUET LOUNGE @ @ REhFRn6Nl$B/ F-TtE @l 7 -7- @l '@l Im H@l r@lru n@t IFidt @l I m SECOND STREET .-, ow6roPti!F6!r f\ O) N Ol U <J fUt! t!F FlrJ tfJ d.Ftt1 Fzod,L SSDA ULJFJ ,J E5FH V)F trl /, ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530WLSHIRE BLVO #310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 REVISIONS TN|NGSUBMtn&t5-WSEO ruNMNG SHNAI6- EVISEO MNING EUBMIruT 7-EVISED Cbckd 8y &d No. GROUND FLOOR PLAN (11/Pl) sruE: 'll'16" = 1L0" =o ,bql No E P - A2.2 4 IN g? NoN 6 6OUNqUE (NR@il SUNDRY LOUNGE LOUNGE 'LOUNGE I g d MEEINCRU. SERVICE th\[h ttrffitlffi I ]-- T- tlF P2 2ND FLOOR PLAN . OVERALL = 1',-0" REF. N 0' 8' l5'32'64' SECOND STREET orv€sroPlil!trdlr ONESTOP OESIGN INC. Nol N Ol U <JfUlrJ UJF Ft!t! d.F Fzod.L SAD&ULillr] 'jZ-) FH CAFr!& 3530 WLSHIRE ALVD f31O LOS ANGETES CA 9OO1O - PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 E E q REVISIONS rumtNGsuBMtmt5- WSED ruNNINGSUBMIru*6 MNNNGSWMIMI6. ruUSEO MNING SUBMru' 7- SVISED 2ND FLOOR PLAN (r2tP2l sruE: 1/16" = 1L0,, E P-A2.3 tt ,)t t ,, tt t t /,t tt ,t J r J PARKING LEVEL P3 PLA N 6" = 1!0" REF. N 0' 8, 16'64' J SffRY ffi I I /l i I I I l"K*'* I I I I I I I I I .E - 1'1 ,_1_ j t. e 2 2 e ----- orvEsroP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SO WLSHIRE BLVD #3IO LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-OO35 & PA22-0O37 N Or h N O) U <J Ut! t!F FlfJIJ &,Ftl Fzo&.L SgD& ULJH'.jE5!H V)Fr!d REVISIONS ruNING SWruJ 5-WSEO 12-2X202 UNING SBMfrA il 6 ruNNG SUilIfl[I6- REUS€Dg-203 UNMNG 6UBMIMI7. RUSED Dffi By Ctockd By Gd No. P3 LEVEL PARKING FLOOR PLAN sruE: 1/16" = 1!O" c IFql No o o P - A2.4 / / I I t--J 3RD FLOOR PLAN PODIUM LEVEL -L3 1/16" = 110" REF N 0' 8' 16'64' 16 g5 h g7 rfl g3g2 ^ lgl ELEV, wsT. g0 \@t-; &9 M $1 &$5 357 s r-j -.11@Lll- \_\a$3S SUITE4@;J $l 320 \s 3m SUITE3 sr 3S s9 3/0$7 s 311 STOMGE 7 ffi{ \327 ill{ 32 325 321 323 SUtrE5 ol u1 5t 320 u _r 3r3 thl : 9:j 316 gi 3r0 Lq sj -il 315 I il SWMMING POOL CORRDOR ELEV, LO88Y I 3r8 I!l 7 orvEstoPl'!Fte!I ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SO W LS HI R E BLVD #31 O LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-O037 ruNtNG Smiltfr LI5- REUSED 12-2t2W REVISIONS sruE: 1/16"=1-0" N O)nN O) U <JfUt! =t!F F trJt!d.Ftl Fzod,L SAD&9F Es& MNING SWINA'6 UWNGSUBMIruJ 6. EVISED ruNMNG SUEMINA J 7 - &VISED DBM ry ckckd By &dNo. 3RD FLOOR PLAN (PODIUM LEVEL) I INr) N N b P - A2.5 -I- !?l-t / / / / t-______ l TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN 4TH TO 6TH FLOOR = 1'-0. REF, N 0' 8' 16'32',64', , 4 1S 451 152 &4$4$ 4S 430 sutE! 4$ 460 SUNE3 461 165 4694fi4d sum 1 1t2 125 421 122 419 Lq F 112 111 SUITET l_ E| 411 414 lt6 11 lr::ll lll No) h N O) U <JfUt! t!F l-t! UJd.F Fzod.L SAD&Ur-t!, FHFII]& oilEsroPtt*{ratl ONESTOP DESIGN INC, 3530 WLSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA gOOiO PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 tuNlNGSUEMtfr[t 6 ruNNNG S$iltn&r6- reUSED UNMNGSUilIruI T,EVISED l2*2A3 - REVISIONS MNNG SWilIfrA'5. REUSED 121y20n s E E DftM ry chck By ad No. WPICAL FLOOR PLAN (4TH TO 6TH FLOOR) sruE: 1/16" ='1L0" o Fqr NoN -P-A2.6 E 716 ffi 71A 711 A I il zsoA llSUllEAl #ilfl ll ll ioro tBU|GT4 ll /^l 157 7S 739 H 1g 730 su[E {5 737 --t t/ ll78 ll ,r** jit# ,)-17 il l il il il 765ffi sutrE?-11 il ll -dl. sunfiarz ltI il SUITE Ti3 q L --+! 129 t62 7 ttM FHM il7$ F--*J ?s ,J 725 ttil 721 \ 731 SUre 5 t05 76 IALq 7@ 719 _ilq'@lll./';J7@ SUITES 715 714 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I It,--'-' FLOOR PLAN L7 SCALE REF, N 0' 8' 16'64' It, -"-'t -- '-7 v/ I owESTOPlitt{Gtl 5 E E B 6 ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3$OWLSHIRE BLVD il310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OOlO PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 nt Ol h N O) U <J =UlrJ UJFj trJt!dF Fzod.L SA Ur-t! ')aot!aFrI]& REVISIONS UNNING SUBMINA'5. EUSED UNNG SUBMIruJ 6 1ie2023 UN|NG Swtfr[t 6-trVlsED w-zat ruNMNG SUBMIilA I 7 - &:VISED ,2GN23 DEM ry ch.kd By qd No. 7TH FLOOR PLAN sruE: 1/16" = 1L0" I Yt NI N ! b P - 42.7 f/// I/f/ /// I I/ I// / I/// I// ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I t- I I ROOF PLAN . OVERALL = 110" REF. N 0' 8, 16,64' L- I \ Its ,*,v h F! 9E t- orvtsroPl'*{atl ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SOWTSHIRE BLVO re10 LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 REVISIONS UNNGSUilIMI5- WSED 121?2W UNING SUBMIIA { 6 ruNNG SBilM I6. EVISED #203 UNNG6UBMru' 7. EVISEO DEs ey ckcM ry &d No. ROOF FLOOR PLAN sruE: 1/16" = lLO" No) h N Ol U <J fUt! t!F Ft!t! d.Fttl Fzod.IL SAD&UL.lq 'j dsFr!& =c N N q? N ! b P - A2.8 a2 1{t F-',i ni J.: fii l--i * i.,1 LJti "Jffii ft:rlq ffii*: o+ARAPET a togT - to v #lr'ii.o ,*-#s ".-#+ ,r'-i::O ,w',fo .';#O ,* -'oiO ,a;r'-Fe .oo"''TO 'i strff fi i+ l'l ::1 BUILDING ELEVATION FIRST STREET COLOR & FINISH I\,IATERIALS SCALE z =F o Uzf- o tEn srrc. I *mil FM$ tr sEm.,n@nnNb! E s@@.,soilFNs E srurco.l$dstus {SEE@R I WNMWdEfuIE)Fd{OREINFO.) -\ 1-z.iqil+ ,6/-#+ L5n tosz - ro" v tgz - ro" v ,*-,lqf r-+ FRONT BUILDING ELEVATION (' Eg H tri L1-{ ffitiil Htr HE HH Hffi El SCALE FRONT STREET 1m4,:t;c orvEsroPt'lFtdl|I ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SOWLSHIRE BLVD d31O LOS ANGELES CA MfiO PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 r\,1 O) h N Ot U <JfU UJ UJF j ul lrJ d,F Fzod.r 4 O.'.ltr,D&UL,.Fl ',j freFrI]& REVISIONS UNING SUBMINAI '6 - BUILDING ELEVATIONS swE: As indi€ted MNING SUBMNru'5. REUSED 12-212022 MWNG SUilIfrAT 6. EVISEO w-m23 tlNING SUBMIN&} 7. EVISEO ,2t2V3 c q? :q N ! b = P-A3.1 1Ol3Ol2O24 3:42:46 PM PROPERW LINE PROPERW LINE 'o a -l l Q i, ' '1 -'\ t I 1 lt J I _e _C -qr _el *t et da dEaaaa 1 l 1l lr ll 1) .ll li t:I I 'l) ii ll t: ]Ir 6l I 2_ e5+a @c r-ozo m m Ioz o @-{7 m m-{ ao m q il e lo IPtolv IT l-t< i=lm l;, p g E H E aTg:! 3{E?; :E!RC9;Fci ;f!3E 9gbEgal;ae 0Fct +: g PROPERW LINE m mf PROPERil LINE o a>a#IH + aEP p tEl trl lel il E -,,^:16 E - - - ' E =19 I*EHiFiFEigq F$E E aq fe 3a :E H ile Hle E i+ E; 5* E; E ;ce;- n ; P ! Fl i; ':g e m$msMMm 1Sa i=-E - EMMMEffi -t-' _i{_3ll 4r dc A; Sl9A+A m Q+ Q (Dc ozo mrm -{oz ={mv(n{ {m gr ao m q n B ,) rill mffimffillffi$ mmffififfir [A] '| 1-: .- . MHSmm$ m MMMMWMMM a HFlsEE r8 NA od TEMECULA RESORT & SPA v m aoza $eEBSletfB 3 = BlZl*iZl$l= Tl'TlfTLf B f I l-l llt i*l t;I lll 16 16 I lel t I ltE rg1 l15 3 d gll I S^,N m f,E iEaz>aa FRONT STREET, TEMECULA, CA92592 + 4 4 -t 6D T i I I i TOP OF PARAPET ^tm7 - to" v *ff:,:o L7a rozz'- ro"v ,*r-,l.u,O *illof$ *r-#O ,tr#O 1097'- ROOF 1087 - 10' L7_ _ r077 - 10'ht UI FI FI 9l sii"'-4, sii,^-, $ii,.,* $*.. -tr ::a::ti:: :: LdNGE & 0f,a.a *,-#O +!1 q FRONT L1 @ FRONT ST. A rool - z" v-2" BUILDING SECTION SCALE +TOP ("1 T.4 ,3 i^sffi,o- +L7 1077' - 10' SE*^," $'1*-ro 10' Q,-r-a +11'= 4 1@S - o', sii.,-0' BUILDING SECTION 1/16" = 110" owESTOP E{l3tF\rf ONESTOP DESIGN INC f 3530 WLSHIRE BLVO *310 TOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 MNING SWIfr&* 5- RilSED 12-21202 ruNNINC SUEMM ' 6 UNING SUilIru' 6- REUSED w-2v3 ruNMNG SUBMIEI* ?. RilSED N Ol At O) U <J =Ut! lrJF FlfJtri d.F Fzod,L S*D&UL,. l-t L lrl IJ)Fr!& REVISIONS a a a P d I I + NoN o BUILDING SECTIONS sRE: '1116" = 1L0" P - A4.1 o q s ! s o t I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I +'a + + TOP OF --t---- ROOF I '.'", I Al' I;l I =1 , I 'I lrli llrhlIHlFt,fl OFfARAPET A togT - ro v at""r'::i+ *rilf rm;;-rLfO ,*. Ho ;-t-fO */-#o 1ffi7'- 10' 4\!,rt l I I L6 L5 1057'- 10' L4 I I I I I I L. 1U7-10', 10' Ql#- Q,;;'."- 0' -i*5s +1@8'- o', -"olf1m8' S"J"'.0' f BUILDING SECTION = 1L0" 4.!r-*' $,T;".a, Sq*-r" fii];,t'-- 9f;,--;- s*q;'o- SE-a';- Sfj*,-o- 6D T I I I I I l I ,rr+e ,*"-i?O ,*i-#O 'a;.-#o lB?--,1;e MENSiOILf I 4.36%- :---::-> 4.35%*a:-'.:+ .5 Q3i"; "#.;?+ BUILDING SECTION i t SCALE l/16" = 1r0" oilEsroPFlSHlI ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530WLSHIRE BLVO f31O LOS ANGEIES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS MNING SUBMIfr{il 5. REUSED N O) h N O) U <JfU UJ t!F F UJt!d,F Fzod.L SADdUEit! 'jz-Fr6F Lrld 59 I E -5 ruNNGSWruI6-WSED MMNG SU8MIfrA17- REUSED Ch.*€d 8y &dNo. BUILDING SECTIONS sc[E: th6" = 1rO" P - A4.2 I r-.,l;IE tlt d I :1. . .I5*!;ir*.Jll-tf {..t. l. ilf-l!*].,!f,i:trUZ:li,":l .lf---ii .f ll N,li .44&\J!:t l,*f,f,]f. ll:i;!' U L3ruz' ro.9 . - PROPERry ' LINE L2n rozz - ro" v -;rt-rllO 1'*#lie! @l!eNl::+ ELEVATION . GALLERY ON 1ST STREET ON SCALE 1/8" = 1rO'1ST STREET SCALE 1/8" = 110" PROPERry LINE I 1022 ife FLOOR PLAN - GALLERY ON lST STREET I I SCALE 1/8" = 1r0" N REF. N ! @r!oolle;+ ffi ffiffiruru ffiEI ON FRONT STREET ,oa;-rf;lO SCALE 1/8" = 1r0" "--;l?O Lroretr]];O L1 ;+1m4'- ELEVATION. MAIN ENTRANCE ON FRONT ST REET SECTION . MAIN SCALE 1/8" = 1LO'NGE NT STREET SCALE 1/8"=110" t A: HEIGHT OF BULKHEAD B: HEIGHT OF DISPLAY WNDOW C: TOP OF DISPLAY WNDOW D: FLOOR TO CEILING HEIcHT E: WDTH OF DISPLAY WNDOW F: DEPTH OF RECESSED ENTRY G: HEIGHT OF ARCADE H: WDTH BETVVEEN COLUMNS l: HEIGHT OF CANOPY/AW!tNG J: WDTH OF COVERED WALKWAY K: COLUMN Dll,lENS|ONS L: BALCONY HEIGHT M: CANOPY ENCROACHMENT OLD TO\AN SPECIFIC PLAN 3'MAX. 6'MlN. 8'MtN. '12'MtN. 14'MAX. 6'MAX. 12'MtN. 14'MAX. I'MtN. A MIN. 10' MtN., 24' tiAX. 30't\ilN. 8'MAX. tl J,. IU.t FLOOR PLAN . FRONT STREET rrTr!! I{'IIII ,'t r-lFFllr'H..f_ti;*ff /.:-rFf--Fl: ..f ..a--!- !.+-.1--- + Ip r- F SCALE 1/8" = 1r 0" ,/ PROJECT DESIGN 1'- 0' 8'- 0' 12,- 0. 16'- 0' 5-6. 3'- 0' TO 6' - 0" 12'- 0'TO 16,- 0. 13'-0'& 14'-0" 15'- 0' 9'- 4'TO 9'- 6" 24" BY 10' 4,- 0" 8,- 0' owESToP]'!fidtr N OrhN O) U <JfUlrJ IJJF Fr!t! d,F Fzod.r SAD& ULitlr] 'j deFr!& ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SOWLSHIRE BLW *310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OOIO REVISIONS Gd No. swE: 'll8"=1-0" PA22-0035 & PA22-0037; 4ANING SUBMINAL * 6 UNING S6MruT 6- REUSEO UNINGSHruil 5. ruUSEO 12-2r2W ruNMNG SUBMIfrI* 7- WSED ENLARGED DETAIL9 lSTAND FRONT STREET =4 I s N. b P-A5.1 @i ..'-i:':O 12 o1 022'- 10" ro," -"0? e SECOND STREET EXIT DOOR ELEVATION 'mPritQ) ELEVATION . RETAIL ON 2ND STREET LON= 1:0" SECOND STREET SCALE 1/8" = 1!0" PROJECT DESIGN OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN 3'MAX. 6'MtN. 8,tilN. 12,MtN. 14'MAX. 6'IVAX. 12'MtN. 14'tiAX. 8'MIN. 8'MIN. 10" MtN.,24'MAX. 30'MlN. 8'MAX. A: HEIGHT OF BULKHEAD B: HEIGHT OF DISPLAY WNDOW C: TOP OF DISPLAY WNDOW D: FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT E: WDTH OF DISPLAY WNDOW F: DEPTH OF RECESSED ENTRY G: HEIGHT OF ARCADE H: WDTH BETVVEEN COLUMNS l: HEIGHT OF CANOPY/A!IiNlNG Jr WDTH OF COVERED WALKWAY K: COLUI,IN Dlll|ENSIONS L: BALCONY HEIGHT M: CANOPY ENcRoAcHMENT 1'-0' 8'- 0' 12', - O" 16',- 0" 3'- 0'TO 6'- 0" '12 '- 0'TO 't6',- 0. 10' - 2" 15'- 0' 9'- 0" 24'BY 10'I 4'- 0' 8'- 0' ARf GALLERY __,-t .^,___^_ ].17-t- FLOOR PLAN. RETAIL ON 2ND STREET SCALE 'll8" = 110" REF N rt --J H t I owESTOP]i|*{tFilI ONESTOP DESIGN INC. s E 3S3OWLSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA SOlO PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 ENLARGED DETAIL$ 2ND STREET REVISIONS lMffi uslNc suBiln&t 6 t1F2023 UNNC SmMmr 6- REUSEo w-2@3 UNING SUBMIfrA{ 7- RilSED N O)hN O) U <J fUt! t!F FlrJl!d.F Fzod.L JfiD&Uritrl , El;Fr!& c 8 D€M ry ftctod By Gd No. 4 + fi Nos b sruE: As indicated P-45.2 DESIG on EsroP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. l\ Ol h N Ol U <JlUtrJ tfJF FtrJt!d,Ft1 Fzod.r SAD&U E-rt!, Ll tt)Fr!& 3530 WLSHIRE BLVD f31O LOS ANGELES CA MOIO PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 REVISIONS Dffi By Chckd By qd No. 3D RENDERINGS s4E: IWresuillrut5-ws€D 1L2I20U MNNGSWM'6 ilmtNG suBMtfr[r6- wsED fl-2v3 MNING SUBMIruTT- EUSED 5&&3 E E - ts 6 =Ioq! tn No No b m m m mjn OLD TOWN FRONT STREET & FIRST STREET PERSPECTIVE VIEW u m T T E. GALLERY VIEW GARAGE ENTRANCE MAIN ENTRANCE P-A6.1 6D Y I l,-.-;J--, + sl*1?iio 9ih=a ,,i,li"jo +t6 -aH,e -"-,llo a.-#o 1067'- 1 0' 10 L4 1047'- 10' ,9i1'"1$f.^,t .ir*O Qfo,r.,o ,r,#o FRONT ST. BUILDING SECTION scALE 1116" = ? pili:c -*.#o -rorr;#O .*-fo r,--#o -r*,-ri,"'$aiil jl P3 4 P2.5 +iii3,. 1019 -0' +H."*,#o 4#."*#+ BUILDING SECTION i t I SCALE lB O'UE TOPF!f{6!I 3530 WLSHIRE BLVO *310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 REVISIONS ruNUNG SUBMNAil 7-RtrSEO t2s2023 ONESTOP DESICN INC &dNo. BUILDING SECTIONS sc[E: 1/16" = 1r0" UMING SUBMIfrIT5- REUSED 12"2t202 ruNMNG SUilNA il 6 ilNING SUBMII&T 6. EUSED N Ol h a\t O) U d-JfUIJ t!F FlrJt!&F Fzod.L SAD& U F-it! 'j Fl IJ)Fr!d E c nNI s o P-A4.3 owESTOPtt!tr6!r ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3530WLSHIRE ALVD {3IO LOS ANGELES CA SOlO PA22-0035 & PA22-DO37 N Ol N O) U <J =UtrJ UJF FtrJt!d.Ft1 t-zo&.r SfiD&U E-rrr]'./ fr9Fr!& MNMNGSBIfr&T 5- RilSEO 12-2v2W UNNING SUBilIru ' 6 1-1emz! MNING SWMIruI6. WS€D P|NNGSuilfl[t 7- RUSEO ,2S.2As REVISIONS Chckd By 3D RENDERINGS silE: B fr il #t SECOND STREET PERSPECTIVE VIEW RETAIL & PEOESTRIAN ENTRANCE VIEWOPEN PANOGALLERYVIEW = !! d N6 P - A.6.2 ,:..... INTERSTATE 15 PERSPECTIVE VIEW I T'IECHANICAL & TRASH RooMs STAIR TOWER a owESTOPl'il{lrelr ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SOWLSHIRE BLVD {310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 E n N or 6 N or U <J =Ul! =t!F Ft! tfJ d.F Fzod.l! SAD&U E-{Et ^)z-F ct)F trl& I REVISIONS MNNG SUBMfrIJ 5.€USED 12-2t2W ruNtNG SU8Mtfr[ I 6 t1t2023 UNNG SUBMtntt 6-SUSEO w-m23 mNNG SSMtfr[l ?- WSED l2FN23 Ck.hd By Gd No. =c Nq! I No No b 3D RENDERINGS sruE: P-46.3 II Tfr 4}4: INTERSTATE 15 PERSPECTIVE VIEW I E E tt I OUOIN ENLARGED DETAIL UTILTY ROOMS ENTRANCES O'VESTC'P]i|!ilAtr ONESTOP OESIGN INC. 3530WLSHIRE BLVDfl31O LOS AN6ELES CA SOIO PA22-00s5 & PA22-OO37 Gt o)h AI Ol U <J fUt! t!F Ft!tfJd,Fttt Fzod.IL SAD&Ur-tJl 'j Frd;FF!& E 6 UNING SSiltnrul5- EUSED 12-2r20D UN|NG SSMtrur T- REUSEO ,&2@3 REVISIONS ruNNING SUBMIfrI * 6 UNNINGSUEMNA* 6- RilSEO Chckd 8y &d No. 3D RENDERINGS silE: 4 o N!\: Nos P-A6.4 oruEsroP ON€STOP OESIGN INC. 3530 WLSHIRE BLVD d31O LOSANGELES CA9OO]O PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 f, E + N orn N o) U J:)UU UF FUt! d,F Fz d.L 4tu,.l(^D&U F-,.t! 'jeoFAFtJJ& REVISIONS ftANNING SUBMINAL il 5. REVSED 12-2t2022 _ PLANNING SU8Miru * 6 11F2023 ftANNING SUBUIfrAL* 6. ruVISED w-2023 PUNNING SUBMIfrAL * 7- reVISED COLORS & IUATERIALSI q! I No o scruE: lHL l SECOND STREET ELEVATION E.2/Stucco :: E'2 a::::: A.3/Pediment Motit: l lt ru ru ru ru t:ilr[tffi lnEru m re lt:itL_].JlHtil trEiEi m rul l-EiIIII IEE] ffi tr tr ffi m J il ,t ,,.,1t I H t I I I n t IT 5t n-T 1= T T fl< I t a '-E.3/MOLDING ffi,),t- NOTES: FOR FINISH LEGENDS, REFER TO P -A7.1 SHEET QUOIN ENLARGED DETAILSEGOND STREET GARAGE ENTRANCE RETAIL ENTRANCE P - p'7.2 c !! s o o b E.2/Stucco E.3/Stucco 8.2 / Cornice E.2/Stucco -< IST STREET ELEVATION i t i : . PEDIMENT ENLARGED VIEW 1 I m ilt PEDIMENT & WNDOWS FRONT & FIRST STREETS BUILDING CORNER ENLARGED VIEW NOTES: FOR FINISH LEGENDS, REFER TO P - A7.1 SHEET. oIuFsroPltlafrilr ONESTOP DESIGN INC 3530 WLSHIRE BLVD #310 LOSANGELES CA9OOlO N O) h N o) U J fUlfJ tfJF F UJt! d.F Fzod,L SAD&Ur- F-t L Z-r Frl ct)FFJ]& PLANNING SUBMTA I6 1-182023 UNNING SUSMIfrA T 6. REVISEO w.2423 frANNING SUBMIru * ?. REVISED F2&20?3 PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS fuNNING SUBMIN&N5. REVISEO DEM 8y COLORS & MATERIALS EI $ By SMLE: P-A7.3 orvEsroP ONESTOP DESIGN INC. E =I 3530 WLSHIRE BLVD #310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OOlO PA22-0035 & PA22-0037 REVISIONS ruNING SUBMIruI 5. REVISEO UNNING S6iltfrAd 6 1n&2023 MNNING SUEMIN&I 6. EVISEDg-&23 MNING SUBMN& ' 7- trVISEO ,2*2023 N O) h N o) U <J =UlfJ t!F F UJ tJJd.Ft) Fzod.L SAD&U F-rl! 'jz-F tt)Fr!& E 5 COLORS & MATERIALS sruE: c q! I No o o ., ,F-_+ ;- FRONT STREET WNDOTAE E.3nlolding & FRONT STREET IiIAIN ENTMNCE OLD TOWN FRONT STREET ELEVATION COLOR & MATERIALS '/,/ r;-' " -) ! ,.:' :)\', ',1:A'' ' - u\l\-<L{r-{\{L{\-{L{L{L (!{L {L (\ {r {\ (L {L {\ {\ ,E.,II COLOR - SHERVVIN WLUAMS sw 7005 PURE wHtTE CORNICE DETAIL D,2 PEDII''ENT MOTIF A.3 PICARD JAI,JNE BRUSHED E.2: COLOR WLLIAMS SW 9108 DOUBLE LATTE A.l D.1 m m E.3/Stucco U m m m mffi mffi mffi mffi BELLY BAND E.3: COLoR -SHERUTIN WLUAMS sw 7010 wHtTE DucK 8.5: METAL BALCONY RAILING & METALCANoPY SHERl,\,lN lrulLLIAilS SW 2808 ROOKWOOD DARK BROWN FRONT STREET RESTAURANT ENTRANCE P - 47.1 !J LEVEL Pl.5 (STREET (STREET E @ tr E B 1 E @ @ P1 (STREET LEVEL) SEE h h v @ E IJEJ REsfiifFNT 1L LET LEVE BNoutH)uilcE ALL TANDSCAPE AREAS SHALt BE IRRIGATED WITH TOW VOTUME DRIPTINE IRRIGATION IN SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BUBBLER IRRIGATION FOR ALL PROPOSED NEW TREES \I fr t TOIAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2.r3 ACRES / 93,022 SF TANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED: 8,086 SF PROVIDED - 8.6% TANDSCAPE TREE W/IREE uo_[lo --uLEIo6o sFZY =>0=FoooJOLi CJEz= oeNJ ,E ,l:{es llrJ-' SIDEWAIK DECORATIVE POLE LIGHT IEXCEPT FROM TEMECULA OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PTAN) Fz C) <; d\ oHtroooAz 2A =2p3FO 9aoii ."i qz: €< I UtoFatItu o JU ZQ optrooo ou< 9B 129BFoooJoui C'Ez= R5 9q >a 6 FuUtFaozN FUUtFaFa U F--o-. =lloll Ealld-lJ cHlltrolloollu> llq=il =2ilo=ilFO I6d IJI Oui ll 2H F= STREEI WfREE GRATE PTATANUS ACEETFOLIA UMlIS ZONING: OLD TOVViI SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE: DOW\TOWN CORE / HOTEL OVERLAY lrl u 0' 8' 16, 4 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET .1, *.t , -:NIB9E- - - -E-l-"*-;J LIGHT 2 64' owESTOPli|lr{tdtl ONESTOP DESIGN INC. 3SOWLSHIRE BLVD *310 LOS ANGELES CA 9OO1O SQLA lr'rc N O) h N O) (J <J fUl! t!F Ft! lrJd.Fvl Fzod.L SfiD&U L-{ EH& Londscope Architects PA22-0035 & PA22-OO37 a REVISIONS lNWffi[ffi\AE 12-2V02 MNNING SUBMItrAI6 UNING sWNflT*6. EVISED MNMNGSUBMIruI T-EVISEO ,26m23 - DEm By Chckd By &d No. LANDSCAPE PLAN s*E; 3/64" = 1L0,, c @q! (i'i Noso b P-11.0 rfl tu i-6-^ lgl \16t-;1l di 16= <!:+:J r-liall@Lll- @;J \ ,{ SUft€ 6 q. Q\\> \'at-€€ ,/,U4>"a .--nr. r-dla\ SWMMING POOL a e C3 r----Tl \ SYNTHEIIC TURF WITH SHRUBS PERENNIAL AND PLANTER WITH SHRUBS SUCCULENTS .) LOW AND ITYP 2-3 re @ d AII. TANDSCAPE AREAS SHATL BE IRRIGATED WIIH LOW VOLUME DRIPLINE IRRIGATION IN SHRUE AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS AND BUBBTER IRRIGATION FOR ALT PROPOSED NEW TREES CI PHOENIX ROEBELENN / FIGMY SI FLATNU€ X AGRIFOUA'BL@E TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2.13 ACRES / 93,022 SF LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED: 8,086 5F PROVIDED - 8.d% LANDSCAPE*IOE SIRIATA / CO& AOE * o*.r"**rror*u6^TED/vNrEcarEDFLduLy Q xuneroenorecmrmsrprNk[wlyGms $t EMEr&sfl GW RuBRUrrpuRpLEFouMANcRs S HmruMreNdm.rewyl&NENyMwzraNFH scr M C ru"*.*t* *,MRFpouEcRMrE € r*oroo"rnooroeerc rcBERGRcE f---{rs3meNmwI lcFN'rusffi@sL TicffHsx86{RERtAMmtnVArs ryRtn oREOPStEAURtfl UT WA' WSF rrcreEEo E d @ @EOPS6 I.NEETA'LMLS NdSEEOfu*flA MERIENIA ' C4K LEfrUG IGA L EMERMLE X'AMM' IBENffi UYLILY SW X PLRP.L FXEROR''PfPIF EYPLWSTflLCR@ IEGRIUM (ru&OfrS'MCTtrruM''PRSTUIE GtrMER I. }NFTH OFAMKilULEREilREDWERAL FWTMAIERN BE SED UNXR GRANMWR Mil FUI6. 2. IRE€6 NO 6MUS 6HAL BE P N WAIER MF€R. GE MSER. O AMISilUM OF 10 AWAYFRd UNUN4E6, ATINMW OFgAWAV RE ER€MMTSdOFIREDEPAIMEM SRIN{ILR REF N 0' 8' 15',32'64' so srN@pE @NMclds. 3. SE€ @NCEPIUA L^GWE PN (rcIEO PEISI FR POITS PINS E orvEsroP E IillSHtr ONESTOP OESIGN INC. 3$OWLSHIRE BLVD il310 IOS ANGELES CA MOiO SQLA rruc N Ol O) U <JfULI =t!F FlrJlfJ &.Fttr Fzod,lr SAD&UErtJl 'j FHFrI]& f, Londscope Archilecis PA22-0035 & PA22-0O37 UNING SU8Mtrut5- WSEO 12-2!20U ruNMNGSBilINAT 6 MNING SUilIflAI6. RilSEOw"2w UNNG SU8MruI7.WSED s2&2A3 REVISIONS DEM By Chcrd By GdNo. LANDSCAPE PLAN L 3 sruE, 1/16" = 1r0" 4 @ g? lh NoN o P-11.1 l 5 a 4 E I E E El I t I I I t, s5*tr39iE FiEt t.9 =ii6 L- O'U6]?Ptil:ildtl ONESTOP DESIGN INC, ffiWLSHIRE ALW re10 LOS NGETES CASlO ft IMNAN$ MMANEO IN ffSIHrENr rN@oilrFsPMRET& RGHIS OF dE SIOEoE6tc{ N Pmn trPnNc ThsffiWEM&E6EONffiM ND 6REE6 IMT IT SilI NOT FDWUETEDINWE*NPMI MdSNO IO OMEffi, WTHOI BEruR WreN ffiENJ OF ilE STE MGffidEAI*SdCN XzI AL RCHIS RESEMO NMORSruLGftRALJOB &TECNIbNNDMNROWR GNdEffiNdEEWftBESE MWNGSREION@NTRrcNd, TEMECULA RESORT & SPA rELflEt{'M 11J6tfl ISSUE T.8,D trtr"H dDrn tsl,2t PHOTOMETRIC PLAN - STREET AAtl0ltc4tUO Litelines 01d Town Series Crm6ncor Sedfic!ilorr rltl.r {lL t Llrellnes- TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRONT SI f EMECUh, CA 92592 APN:922-07'NEw ':'\ t 7g \ FIXTURE IYPF: FXo1 MANUFACTURER: LITELINES tu1ODEL: OTT-s-50-N{H-277-2-8K-HSS-PC MOUNTING HEIcHT: t6:0" WAI-TAG€:50W LUtulENS:4000 LUMENS LLF: 8 F(t) ozN Fa Fa Feet oLD TowN rnorut sr SHt torx.xxxx Litelines Old Town Series f!s!ir4i€ q$!E'dd Ptr$' :3<.iBrnFtrl:lf i x_dshln,rj5Lr,r: lletir€s- cf7roF TEtAECALA F.p&tuwFP&tcws cs-4 %t hdNd tu 3M:b R.C.t. M. _ AfLaIE 8Y: @N6e.ffi/*MP 8.4{ M. a122-r LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS TEMECUIA RESORT AND SPA FRONiSr.'!&ECUS CAtS2 g t F "- *: I ! ! Rr s1 LE n. .rB.S P100 i- E 3 t E t Itl I I iEI !!s It]trIH9lE gIF L- ONESTOP DESIGN INC. orvEsroPl'lnrF{r WISHIRE BLVEN3lO ANGELES CAgmlO 3S0 tos IflE INFORilATIil COMNED N THS PROPRHAY dGWS OF OIE SOP.SSG*MPTMYffiNGTBEMdMEMDES S N CONFIMG NruC TO Itr WOLE fi N PMI MR MORWMACMTdE$OP coRR6m dE froF 6C{a ar Ecfs RE*Rwa COMRrcIOR $A[ VRIW ^LL JOEft mNDMONS NO NOIF OMR#NNREEdESWTHE* oRAWNOS mbR TO NcdsRsflts. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA ffiT@IEMPN ISSUE T.B.D m*B' m2rfl t$vl PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.GAMGE B1 SINCE SIRGTE loblkmpllm.s lS . tu.dtfd Nt, o8s aEmrrrruDsc.4yS€ Nt. 0.8S emn/TENc4v$c ') \7 ,, it 1: ?. ':. it'," r,,,22 1,. r). ?. -\t >, ?,.:. 1t 1\ >j l. \t 1t 1t ' r.; r.1, '. 2..:t 1: \r t,. i,.:t rz ii i, ti tr !:::,1i 't> 16 1,.,''r! !r i, 1;; i' :3 !.; ir !, ii :,, !r !: i::. ir !i 1i 1.. a. az l?'rr r;' ;. i::i:, !i 1i tr ri.::rl i "-r t" :,nrz,, r, !. l : '- r l!TAIR-1 MH:,.7s'1., 'ir i it i. 1: :r 'rr -, :{. !: !. i: at' !.':. \.,1. ir f. i1..r i. !;.;i tr. r;ar oai "alhH: &.rs : r 're i5 !::e2 1: !. ir !r ?::e1 !i i..:: i, !! !, ir ir n$ 10,&6_83 1.0 sH: tr5 ls !r- ifl*r.?bo ' :i li. ir i. 1? 3: !r :r: '., i i ir ij l: \r t..,i - 1: rr+t.7t'i'i. : ir !a ij 1':! i: !r:. a3 \' i, .ri \5 !?:: ie tr.;: t.1.11 1';1:c: ti'; -.?.5? 1, i? t"';. ':. ')i i,: \', ! !L RAt t. .7r !e i: 3J t. !. ill:3?5:' 1' 1.i.1r !, i{ i.':-:r':. ir? 1r.7., :r ?! !i :? ,:.. ;! :2 il i! ?r t: it !. 'r3 '.r :. i, 1. t- , 15 i! i !i 7i',1:'t;1? !r 12 ij: !r !. lr :. r. i, :., .. :. i, 1, :. \ ... --. it,...j. ? :f io t. l', l? \,t 1 i?.t.i \1 \1 l.2ruat '. \). \. ,.,:.!nHk7sr. . ! ,,. t !- ':. .t.'6t rt'i] ia i: 3, \n t. tt.'.. )! :3;i ir:?:r: '.i n. ir:!:1 t: i.e :' )z :i !r ?3 ii !: !? t: :. 1?r ';r -!, i:}e':r i: !r !: t, bi',a 7r 12 it tt ;: i: ',3 tr rf !! r.{ le ..,; }. ir !? nl 1)dAt 9' .. :i :-; 3,. ir .:€ !FA!j is ts .. ll'9..1t., ..... i, i, ', ;,ry;t1l:,-. '.: j, li t l: :, .1:. 1' h: i i1 i: ': 1. l. a?'!t'.t iz \.- i: t: !r ..i t, 'rr ri ls !l '.,, 'r. !i i 'ti.' \t 7t 'ix '1, -,i. !, -. r, !.;r':; !: \i 2'. a.'.,. ti,. \1. \.2, ;:"[;;.:: ;; :: ;: ""::fi.;; ,; To|MUb n*d a sF {Pr*try &try€tr_2@t-ton4.ActR@tdj tudr.actzfu R4on by: bml ^dn.4d.6 I Apddon! Engtndkldns Ki k Or.dd $o tldnlh SchduL lor Llgn lde Facbr - Unt63 &l& lPcru by c!s@,Rd&n€: 2@a . unb! otuM* .Fttu by cu.tfrrWtlM&41 Luml.ale dab b dbind e.@rdiq lo tES p@odu6utusnbon d hhbry dilds, Fbtd Mu& my dltrd tom cffipubr ldldtds du. to m.tryunddle$ h6c inclldlng, blt d Xtu b Uft Vdk$ V.filon., bry hffi, Eatbsl IrNt hn3, LEO O&.8 tnput y.&, T{tsdus Vlrbtm and Jddr. &Mtom, tH:a,75 tN:8-t5 ii i-. !) nr'rr :s !! 1r i. ,i t. te .:.1! a? \.i 1. t.';, 1r .r,:\. r..2., \. t1 \: t) i. i. r, !. !i \. a, r '-.'.1? 1,1. !. i. ): tr:! ti !s:r !? ii:1 i: l:: i? \i tr >r';i 1r rr iz 1, :.. i: ir " :1 t-' \r .1. .tr "! \t'.1 2.'s:1,i i. tr !. !; !. !i !: ij !{ !"'r3 !6'Jr !FA!! !5 !. tr i, IHr B.B:.. 1 :,. . il i1 !n i, \/ i"!t .1 )r i: ti i, a,! "1 tr i.1r:a !r lj iz \, ]' tt, ':r i.2:':: ! 1. l1 !: ti:,3r ]i :. 1.1 , ), : re .., 'r,2a i.,')e 3. \1 '\) i2 ts \2.:3 \, :i:, .. 1, : L i.i,r,11 ],1. ,. .,7';!..:, !! !r.r, ij !r:.'.r flH:8.75 tH:8.75rX:0.1! i,1 :! ?. t ?! \, 1e !! ir ! ), :1 !E lr t.:r ir: ir tr ':r 7r.r,... t. } 1s t: !! 33 tr iz.,--.oar- .ar "'.;, "- ",;oi..- !q1b4.7b,. ir i. !: 1, tr iri:h76?o :: r! f,. rz .\1 Z, ii|ttr6i, :r re ti !., r,. l, iliro.?S 1t tr !c,!. l.'?? i. 1! \, 1?.,r.,-2 )i.re',: i; a. i: \....i 1,,$.:"-B: .\,5 iAtt{ .1\< ": b, 12 .t. t, a. \. i. !,: ! i. ,r ':r t1 !, 2. 1! \, ii ?j ,,. :i i: 1. 3r tr ;r t, li !s l.'1, !j t? !.r 1:1. tr ii \? ra..., j. !5 !3 rrr ;q !..!,1i :; tr 1: t! ir i: i€ iz:r:ts i?'j? -.c ij t::! !r 1,. i,L te ?? td le:. 12 ir i ,5 LL .. ';: \4 ., 1, . ., rr \. i- ,t ,!'.,. ij \r .. ... .. o*, il dr i. r. H.rt5 !j t..1; .!; i.:€ 1! 16 i.] ii:r i€ t.1? ,. it:: ?. i;,i: !: ln ?: ): i::,:6 i.;: ar 1, t. i. is;r i: ti t.j 1. :r ':.: it !r i. ::i io !,! tr ?o )3 !i ii !e ,er t. .6. i3 ): ,:c !r 1, t. t, 'r 3: i1 .:j !: 3r :s !3 !j 1! t6 \! i, ,r 12 .,1 \., 1, lfAlt ?, ;r !r 1! 1d r.i ). !Petr:, ,!r io :o t. i. :: i,a rjr }c f? ,(. rr, i;) ,,. ;r€ht :! !, ?r !r !r ?6 :, ipAl? t:.:? 1,\.:r 7;tH:8.?5 fh: 6J5 mH:8.75 iii: ezs?r !- !i r; t. :? :.i ?! ::, ',r tl'--i,i !.c t. i.' !6 3' ro :: ;l i; -r: :tr !' :r i? l. .,, I'i"yll' ., \i .;, 12 t" ,., n, "'f;tl,X i1 !., !, :; '1 1'c >i ':1 lq :e ?! :r :t 3. ;t aB :!.'r.r 13 :.r :.e i.3 :rr tr !i i- ir ',, 1r lr 'r: i! \t 11 i: .j., !5 !:i i,-. r! ir ':r !r !., 3e :: .!!.a o':lt\lN-4 iz ), i! !s ii.'., >. \?'is ZF l. t),je .1, 1i ii i. 2.,.r Z 1: 1, i. .,i \. 11.* 2t L; )1 -:. :; :, is !r _-: .:. ?? ii:5 ?, rl !) i! !e tr i' !r !1'jr :. t; l,j k i.':.' 2.':: >! i,':' 1t ie :r ?. :r 1r'!tj.)1 7. ].j .i; i. r. "..r.t1 \. i,, !, ij i, iJ ir r! i: 'r, !:J !r',:: !? ir ir i2 l. \i .Ft, \t:1 :2 .,! :5 1, !.; i: ir 9: ir tri ir 1r \i,,,:,i !. 1i la rr .,1..s,!.t ii !r .ir ia ir i5 :r iz \, *. 7i \1 b :!r >! 1) 11 :6 to i:: '. 1. ,> ir :: ii r: !, !: -7, ,r ';, !r i. i3 !1 1 ta i2 ii :. !: :, !, :c i: :: t: \!t ,.t \:, .t' ,? \: ir 'llH:''?5 -r 1or !r !' i !r 1r "r i6 1: b !r 1, :.s 13 !s :.s 2t ,t ?. 11 !, i. :; ?i !i ri -12 ii ,. 1, \! .." -!1 ;.a !, !d 1i !3 :s t! :: 1?. nar '' ,dor. .ai oa1!. 1r 1e t4 '!!!l*rre)s br \r "* \t, .;^ tr I'iiitt.r3; i1 :c '3. i!, ): ?. ;ffHidt5)r !: is i. !? r" L, h.l.tst. !. !, 1. ir ,, rr i*ns:,5 t! :, Z! ri:{ t2 1" !i i1 1: :r !1 3r !d i:1 ;; 1. :', ':6 1: az i! i! 'tt i. 11 ':', ' i,_q?. cil i. 1. 1- !r .r! 1, i. !: !^ !: ;J }. .r3 'r, .;, !; !.: r? i: ::,i ?! lr ':.. t., 11 1.! ':. a: a. ..t \,. )r'1r.i2 a. !: r! :: !r !: 1: tr l. !i !. !r ii 1.1, ,r1 ,e, i: :i :, ,3i i] f. iz ,., ?3 1r ir t5'r. ir;3'sr:s 1j ,s:r;. t.o;, i. i.t:1.2 !..ss t6 t,: i5:s:, i, tr1 12 t1;: ?. ia !. ?. r! i.. !4 b2 ti b;:Le 1g l:,r: -rr !t l! !1 i: :: 1.! i: i. i' 1, te !, L, ,': ':. '., .:: rr ir :r! i. i!'t, ix !tr !. t- ir iz Li ,r ...- tr! i. \a 12 zr a.., l. ,.) t. :,, !., 1r .r, ,rl ?t i! :t ri tr "o 'r! !t f. in :1_ t3 :i ':: -r6 :r iir ir !t ta t '.5'1. '.! !. 3r i. ii z' tt .:,'t: ..! i: 1. .!,,:3 ir .rr ,.. ,..r, ?2 i,, i: ,, ':2 jt 1n 1t ?r :!i' :: i' :r ic 1. ;,'. !r !! 1. i! !? i! r,) 't.?'!.'',. i!'?r :.; rq 1r 1.2 t!'t. .3.- .\, ia. a\ \e rrl !: .r!. i, .:e ,.? \, ]j ,ix i: ,; i1 t. \4 !fIa6 :r tr '5J in !6 r( 1,, fcArr" :. i :, ,er ic t: :, l,Al.r, .: :r ta t: ;r ,;. lioAl _!! ii ,1e :o !r 1.a t. ipAlr ,3 \! lq 7, j.2tN: 8.76 {N:0.762. \,r 1. 1? ',i'r;!:'i: !1 ir rd ':? ir r: let"i:i''i. :.1 i? !: rii .,, t, t}*i-t;tut, :tr ii 1i '., .,, ,, ll'!;]u,, \z -:. \, 1,. ... o" T;ti.! i, :! )1 rl :! l. !! !r ':. !! tr i1 1r i. 1r 17 a: ): )c i, tt : 1r ir i.r .:. ,.? t3 i. :. !, !? 1,1 .., .:. ,:: i: 1r :r :? i, \, ,1. ,1 :. t7 .r) 1. :j ,rr L 1' :- 1, I. ir i! i, l. !: r, , ',i :r 1. !r ir ir ;5 1i 1, .ri !. 1 I \.2j 1?'..) is 1i !2 tx ij:r 1n t.r ''' ). 1i i .: i: ir ',i 1. 'r.r 1i \,"Atr: 'qa :e r. !: l.6rt{.s}a rr !J ): 1. 'i!:1 1: t,::r i! )r r.2 !. t.r in P101 ; EI q !t ! Irl I It I, Ilh 3l{tI39fE $IF on tsroPli|lsdilr ONESTOP DESIGN INC. SSWISHIRE BLVEA'O lOS ANGETES CAWlO THE NFMilAIbN CffANED N ftE MORF^RY RGffiS OF OTE SOF mgGN. M PmW ccstNG rHtSMCUMSIMES$NMNFFEE ilfuC^l$ IN MOC OR IN Pffi, NRdsoso ro orERq ffiiff rHE M AT RIGfrS RESRVEO SIE CilffIONS AD NOiry OftER OF ^W ffiREEN*S MH THES TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DMIOPTEM PH ISSUE T.B.O tr*i Go{14 isut PHOTOMETRIC PLAN . GARAGE 82 SFbl qV bbl :$al :- :. 1 P SINGIE SIffGG 5.9 rH:8_?5 i: lft: tr5 i ' !r 3" !h9 o.r5 ! {l}6./5, toJ 1.0 6.9 10,4 "HriJo.*' t€'jldh &60{ a 3F {P.*h0 Aq€€2}_{2r{sta^ctRlM b tndr.r frm Repd by: hrul Avlna.Pd.ro / Apprledds EnoiMrtddnqm: k&6dmtu LumlftlF &hdb 6r Lldh! 106. F!d{ - unl6 ohil* rFtu by cuddorielMn6: 20lM - Unl6a3 &d* lFctu by c6rofrr Dtu:1q1&021 auDh.h &b b dbld ac.dlno b lB mdore3 un& conhlH lahdory 6ndild6. FbH tetb my dfr non ffipdrr pdhlom d6 to mrylncmtdlr* t6e6 lEldiro, bd .d tlhtd t Une vofbg. Vrddom, kmp P.domn€, Sdht t.pd wtu. lED hF lnpd ffi, Td@br. V.dnlffi .d J&h Condltto.s. fX: BJ5 'ri 1! :r ir 1je:, !i:r t.1.,..: i2 ,e,j7 :. t: t2 11 \:: 1:;r';r 1r l.r t,i1 -ri:3;, !s ti !,1: !. !: ?r !) i^ !rDh l,'.r i;:.1: ',.re:.Fdq.:, ?.:! G6 r. , lll'!.t15." i' r. :. :i? '," 1. rtlls'l: !r i: r. r?. XH:8.7-5 ."!|, 1. 1i l2 i: ':. ., i1 \. ..e.1, t! l. \1 ir \.'a2 1: '16 :: l! :. !i tt a, i, .ti..: .t. \. a? t;:;. ..1c':, ' 1.';2 ?^',. ,z l. ) | \: ' 1 '). ';. J: ':) i. 'tL Z, 'tr U,. li':. r1 ':: '. i..'i. it. ?. \. \.':r ir ?r ie:1.r 1! ir,1:f,,ia,:d i.. \\ \ t,. ..1 \: ... \., :r i! 1 !1.- 1r !r'16 t. \, :.?.,i \! 126Al 1.2 at ia \i ;{ h:trs !J i; 3: !r !2 1! li !! !c !r !3 !s !/ " at "ltt! |&r4f6 !. ii it i. !rr*s_7bli: l, ! i ii 'r i !; tf,sh?si: ;: ..n )! \,7. 9r !e i3 !e l. t1.,r 1,,:.J3 i" t^ r!:1 ti.?r ,;. !L rr r. ir:!ir !. nr it !! 1r 1,, ir tr'rd tN:0.?a {X:&?5 [X:8.75 . _r* 8.fi -Xl:8,75 . r$8.7. :-. 'i. ;i i- ,"al:o i" ihr0:'6 ;; \. ir ir !i ,M*{./53 :5 i.'?" t: "n !, i! ls ir i \' ! _1r':. i, :, ir .. :. i. i. j. .r ! .. l"al1. !r i;i:d.75!.!- i.:. 1 e-#r,e:ri \n 1. \w:ry.fi- !r:r !!; UN:8.?5 :1' tN: i.?5 1, i" -!: !: nt. i.i,s!-:1:, ie r. ::1e ).;. ir !7 i. i::r.inlt4d,r Sf/flil-:l i2 !' lr ''! !r i1 l, :! :.. !1 t: .;-. .:r k 1,3 le -.i li !, i; )r ,ir 1 r 1, lj t3 i, i., i- i, t! :: :: t. iil '!.. i. !d r- j: ':, ii ;r 1., l,i !. it 1, .l !) 1i li':, 1i :i ir:: ii 3? i:':,. ,1." \. \: \r..i 7\ a. \< 13;! i, lJ r..,. 2. \1 \r'23 tr i. !: i. ...t.: \e r,t ), -: !:1j 7r \t \a 11.:. .,r !s !, a\ !, '.t;. lr 1i \, ta 1t i.71 j,) i, i. !1 7. 1.- t;t 1.,:j \, i... r. \i i,: \\ ?k \t a. 1. ir i,i rr qA11,.'-.i ',, r, ,, :TH;!;t5,,. 1,, 1, -: 1,: '/r !:6lt rt ir !1 !! tr i. ., !fA, .ii i;,, i, !: 1, rR OJt tN. D.75\t \t 2t it ':, t.j \. -. t: !, ..3 :: r. !! !.1;;-i; :6 1! )r ,,? i.;1!:n i1 in':r i5 ir:3 ir ii i.:1 !::.,:. !i 1-,i6 ?, !: 1! l1 '. 1: ,, .2. '>: 1. a,.1 ':t 'zt \t tr 1,. 1r t? ij: .{d ia i..! ,!: 'rt a.':t \r 1. \') it iz:.1r ir;, t?;j !: t, !r';.! !i tr,r.: :',11:d i1 !:13 1ii !t ir !,:i !.::1.,1, )) t..,,r!.i5 ?! r: ;:'.i ra \1 i.:r Lr -.1 i!:re i( i, iz rr.!, ;:1r td:!s.;r.:.: -17'ri) 1., $ihlR-r r, rilxtg?s,i i::r:i,r t.1z',; !:1. ir !i ie liL tr :; :? 11 i,r ), it:::1a \! "3'.. '!'r ': t ,. ,p . 1" 1, r. : .:. i, "ltitil|l6.7bJ t.r t.:;1. i, 1.. hHl&76':.. i: 'Fl t! !i, i: i.'re !1 i. t6,.. tr .:r 1..;.1..:. "lt ult l let:r.y5." 1. 1 ., i. 1: i:il*s}'., 1. .r 1.. \. */'.;.t;:-, '., ilH:t.75 it'.t 1t ai }t !j il :t 2. \".: t; \.'. :i :a 12 lr'j- :! ir 1.t. \;,'.) Z.'ir ii',r',,o L?......; t\ ic :t :. !1 1., 1!: lc 1i ar !r !2 -xn t: ti i.i i, t! rrr !o i5 !! \, S,Ai61 ;.3 tr t1 :,:r !1 i. tr !P [A:8.rs tH:a.75 tk Ei5i' '.e it a, i. '.. !r -: .', 1: 7? ')1 'r.r r,r ',. li'!l -:+ a. \, ., i, .\.j _ !.iH:,&?5 ii 1! It i.1. t, '?'rr i2 t? !1 :i.r. ai.,j,t:1.a 1,.: t: :.. !r !! ir:r .,: !! ':.! :r Ir t. -"a b.r 1! )r :!e 1" :, ,,tat '.t \' \.a 1,,. ',, t. rihxs)s it -rc i., -:r ':! ?o io 3. :2 tt 'e i2 \5 \{ ':j P102 I t E 3 q E I tr, I : T i h Ed 8 !rtrliPd: etF $leFai6 L- owfsroPtilt{HTI ONESTOP DESIGN INC, S3O WISHIRE BLVE SlO LOS ANGELES CAgODlO lBE INFORffTTbN COMAfrED N NB ESCN. AW Pffi rcCEfiINC IHISMCUfiRIME6SINCONNMG AND reRE€S THAY F SH{L ilOl SNruCfiSN WOE M N PMI, NOR PROR WTEN @N*[ OF dE gOP !21 ArL &6KS REeREO CONIRACTOR $AIL Cdry ALL JOB srE cdmbils do Nona oMF OF AW DI$REENdES ffiH THES€mawN6smbRroNy TEMECULA RESORT & SPA OMTOPXEM PW itmi LB.D il9lH osD2rq t6&r PHOTOMETRIC PLAlrl - GARAGE PI oly al 6 SINGU S!NGE ToblkmpLumF Ul &scddion 8,9 53i a.g 53,40 iiirnnJ,i*i. ing .:*hrb.r,. :., .r. i,. .ri .:! ;:r/!:i('N{:l r n:'r 1.1Y 1.. I i:., :.' i ,.,, 't.: a. ., .. .,i a,: :, 'liAiR" U? l:: l ai. 'i'i i ) )!. i:t ir. _" t_ o et orrjffHl1o.s m+ io:5 ,flrl,io.i Mff: t0.5 &ngd)_202ni0i 4tct 09h Lo!€ Fa.ror . Ohrs$ orhid$ lFcfr.d by cGlod€r lrohrlo dila l! dbtd a.@dino to tES pddr.! !n&. @tu6 lrbr.lory dndntom. Ftotd @!ng hry dftr km cryuw pdtcdoN du. ro D.ny dconhll.bl.ldohtncrudt4,Mnoriln[edto h Volqevad.ild3. bmpkdom.nce, &[st mpdmB, GO Dnvtr hpd weft, TomF dur. V6il!0ds ad .j&tu Cond[otu !, 2t':r >,. 1. 11 1! :. te ?; li :r ..- l: \.. ., .t:'.,. 3L '1.t 1 t. ... re ii - - -4! "ar1-: t. &id5 ,. :; ir :; i, 17 :ilErdoJ. !i :!r .ir r,. i: i: i;ii6.ar,, i: !: 3, 1! ir l,tar 1 .,. a, :. 1. :- i, a, at 1! a., \t ..t 1: .:. }i lH:&5i-:' !- 1=r !! t 1.&lM \t ')- \,, i. t\ i. \. Sl/tlR":j r,.:t.S.q.t:1 i! -:r iJ ii \,,. ii. '.):2. a. 1. ": \. \1;! ii !. :? t. \..t.,1.\ i.1,,. \! t.,1, .;1 ir 1,: \1.!r,, i-. a, i. i." i,1,. it 1l i:. !? 1: ;: tt .. a; r. l. j.^ 1: t. r.: !! t,r 1. :i ,., r" !? l. t1 .1' .\. ai 1,. \. ...: 1.; t \2 '.: i: 1'',:, t., 1"..,j .t 1.. L. .: .:. 11 t: !! t. Lj 1,1. \.. 1.:,r 11 i,, :! i_, .-" ir i, i:, !: t, !l ?a ;: i6 i. i \( \i \. t2 r' \t t, !i r. :r !i ?\, i. \: L, \. ,, :, 1,, rj zn ia 1:.i i; i! !r !, i:, a, a a. t, ti ;i_ 1, ar :, ,,: 1;" i: !: l'; '? :; \t \: l: t6 1. ';'r i< !' !r. i^ !,r !. :r. ir r,.. .rz.s. ,1,\ L,; h. i: ri i. i,; f,, ar:, 1, ;: i: i:t ir ir \. ..; ?,, \1 siAlti.n. tB: 10.5 tl' n' MH.10.5 :i! lr i: iJ i, i3 !, li'i! ?., ii :, t: i,.'r, 1: ic t. 1,< !, \r:\,1. ...:,:,4. !; 1. 14r t: 1i :: 1i i:r tr ?. !,oti i:,. a, \r !.r it, '. ffi:10,5 ff: to.sl.:.\,1.att i3:i !.:j 1? :i lr 1s t., Zi ts.i: a.1.... t]',. \. a.- \2 \. at'... i,'r. |:...1 1.., i, t, \r.r,.r2... ,,.,1? 1. l.']t 1( 1.')\'1L.:\ )6 1r.ie i !, ;, nr;? \ ... r.2t.., 15 l: :ii l. :d ? 1: i. rr :r i. :r .:e i. id i: .i. i: \2 a. ,t, ':b 1r 1.. te'd,: tr ilHr 10,5 IH: lO.5 1, i. 1! i:r t" Sl: to.s i. '" f. i2 !a;j t.1 !, i. !- !i t3f.t, .:.....a. :3r trt nr !' I' lt 1:!',tr'-- '... :t- 1!F r,,: \tr..':',:. .a: i: 1. \. 1e i:! ':rr'a. '.:.3 ':i.t . a,jr 12..::a at. \..2.j3: .,r: .r. :l 1 -.'!r' .ari 1,i, r._. .,ir ill tr-.;: r t)t 1, tn. .i,. .... 1. : i,. '!)i, ',rr '{,; }); l.i \rq \t't.'.'.'.'d')r:,1:: h. .:j, -!:1 !, ,,.i1'';;i ". :" r'i$9.,0.;, ":S,.,1u.;"iffi.,,;.p '. *. ., !e_' 1.t ir! :,i :!, 'r,, i.: *! !:3 1j. :.. :1r 1:: ),: .,1, t.r \ 1 . :,'.r : ?6 e.,., .,I1tr,;i, "lffi 1nu.,'.;tr,6,,. *.,,., li. i21 ii. :ri \.4r'4t.ri i.7 .i.. 'rr: ii, ., ..i61;; e,511r6.0.,,i911,;s ,. ,,, ,,,oil:i ! BOUI IOt''FL']lTVER siJ{)PSiICP 5U8 9 -2' i)' AR'I- i;AI i FR\' i iiVENT 567 i:P ,)6{j ,,. oiX1",;5.. ig,,i6.ur,l6,,;i, ,,. .,., .., 'J: t./ !r' i- : i i, 1.r !..r '". i:j rr. t :-,::::]:.jrr:.5 \4i:j 11j *..!!r.:3F !) ti? 6' '- ,-irt .- 1lr. .orr' "rh, ro15 t*,.id.r'''ufiiro.i ,' ' P103 J I $ 3 t E r q $ I Et !IBrIi36:rtaetE ffe ioo ONESTOP DESIGN INC. oruFsroPH!3ET $3OWISHIRE lOS ANGELES BtvE#310 cAm010 THE INFORUATION COMAtrED IN IHIS OOCUflENTWC*rcRAIB O6IG{, N PffY A@NG IHbmcuilEf D€ so t{ coNa*rcE Eftb^TEDNWdEOR IN PAtr. NOR PEQ ffiE{CdSRIOFdEfrS COPNEM ONE S@ USGN $E Cdmbils ao Noiry ohROFNq$RlffiOESwfiTHESE s^wresmbRroN TEMECULA RESORT & SPA ffircflENPW ilffir ISSUE IB.D mffiJ osMQ iot52r PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. GARAGE P2 qy 3f slNGt€ SINGLE Toblbpllnh6 [F hdptto. xa. q0$ &ffi/ruoscs.v8€ N.A 0.N &rdtaENc-24w4 ' \, '!, a. :: f i1 '.r '_. \,, 2i t. :, :- :r tJ 2r .i,, 1e i. 1,. 2,- :J l.t ir 'ji i.{ !. 'r, i. :--i, ,s 1. ::, \r .1,, 1,. ii .ri i{ -.i .",_ ?. :r S-iAlR_- \. '.. i, a i i. !, :. _r! :< ir i, :.. :,r .,. t: .., 1i .;:r a. \: ... 1\ lt ir '.., ':. :: lili: ' ! :. .::.b:.i-.1,, .t z.\,..-.\AI "AT a. '.. \1 zr -,, ,,, n$|8.?E :;.. i !r, !, ,-!r,gr.rtf ':. .r '.' it. \. '.: t,, sr lR_5 .., i.n^."r.;,, .,,. t" .,,qS i,r 183 10-2010,25-0 1,0 Lftub n ed & SF lh*ld &Es+2) h2!-10-t4lCt R€Fnfd: &tuwcr.mRqd by: Lrel Avldtuio , AFtldoB €n!r@r Uountng il.: h tu.stu Lodtrtc scMlb td ughr ldr Fdd , Unb$ dJds 3Ftfld bt .6rmM*6i 2il1M0 . UdB orheills stscru b!, cusrffi. lumhalr. &b i6 dbind ffiding lo 16 FeduF!!@dhrdld l.bdorycondruoB, fddrasuli roy dF.r tu cd@r pddffi d& lo rory!ft.Mlrb! hdoB h.iud4, bd d ilnlH tollft VdbF Vria&d, hp P€nolmne, &lld tnF le. lEO Dd.6lnpulwb, f€m@m Vd.{d!.nd J&b Codl0w_ nl:dis " r,.i14r.75. tN:8,?5 '? i! ,: !: :: ?2 1:':: !i !i l.u{t ;r :. r.tH:4t5 ',r ,!: l: i2 ';! -16,, !J !, 1. li l, ;i tL 3.r ir !. '.. :1 2', \a \x'tt l::r t.1rr ). ., u:Al :, r' r. :c :i, r: :.Ml:a.ts t:',; ?r;. !r ii:; tlF tt! i; ?! :: :: 1: :! i. 1! !: ,.. ,,, ti .:: .i) 2: ... \< i, \;. >: \i'): \t \, \' ?t r: 'r. :! i ! .r: \. \,. ,, .te \2 \; a. '.. j; 1, .:- ,: ,:z .iL t) i1 f,!, l? L: i.13 !r i. i3 tk 8_75 1e 1,. \z ,1 1 l.;1!rliirt " 'bli , Li,, ,. 1 ., J:, ... .. ,. i.€!, :. i ... i. :. t: !. !r r. I .. r. ... r '.{tijsrq i. ,: .,. r. i.. .j. i,Mija.r5. i. r.. i, .... , ..ii*r, 1. i, 1. i. .., .- -iI,"*, , ,. ." ,, ,lilr,r* 1t l.':j ... 3r i. i: ic r.. 'd' ';. ;. i) .L 7: \. a, a. - .j: .:.: 1,t.r,: ir !:, i, r." 1: .r: 1f i{ !. \." .,, 1} .,,, .-r .rt i. i! Ir i! 1: tr ':1 !i !i !i ?: !, !d 1r !: i: i. :.r :! !i r, rr !s i! !i :.r !2 !! i: n! i: !. :i1 2: i. \a,..91 ),) i{. !r !. 1. 1; !t 11 'rr ir 1r i, ir 1t :s ii ., j - :rr t2 i. ir I i, .!,, .;. i! !! li i j ir !1 i: ,r, :r i, :, !, i1 \, :: l, .,, a. ,,, ,,, ,. ".fr,*U ''a :t ':. 'r \t 1< \1 '., i. i: ra t" i. iif 1, i: !r tr ''{ }r 'ri rj. !j i; is .., .:, ',, .:. 1! lj i: t? !1 t2 }. n2 ij in ... i, \: \:, 'rt i1. i.':.. i,, !j !i:r'r,1! t: !.. .,r !d:! 1!.ld i?;i !r.j!.,,.! 1:1r t1 !? e: !:- !;,:: is:r ii;3 i? _.F..! 1, i,.?r,r :.1r.,, ,lrq. -., ,^ ''3r.. l 1. 1. ... .. .. .. i4r;, r, 1. i,.. :. :. r,o61 12.r....,. r. r,..lg | \ 1t ... :.rH:8.75 rHi 8.7i " MH:8:?i . fiit, ais ,. rH: !.7i1' 1_' i !: i: t: l' i, ij-" :6 it " :e 1: tt ir :r i. ';! !i ':r :r t! 2s :rr r: r: L n, irij l; r. :: i. i: .:r 1, , ,\ j \a.,, a\ j, \z "' ''' "t"ll': ?' r' r' a, i! !i 1- i:' \' i! t.t 3.1: r! !i 11 a{ 15 )i 26 t. ':' iz \: !, i, l, :., re i, r. .,d .:r i! :J r. Lr .:i slAlti_/t tr ?i !a ir 3: i. 15 1t a; 1. at ':. >2 ',q 1, i. i. 'L a. .:. '2n i.. \+ 1t .,; .., 2. :t 2. !5 )2 2r l,; !, 3? ;r :.. !i :! is ! ?. r:ir l.e 1!. i; ?? irr ':. 1i ':t 22 7r \2 t-. -r: ?r 1r ,:: t: t: ir 1r :; 3: :3 i; .!i i. a;, rr :, t: .rr a3 at \t .t2 ir ir ir i: :r 1. il';. 1i tr i. !r ij ir i: \_2 \. a. t? \. ir' 1? ,rr i3 :ir i, n3 ;, !2 !: :: i! 1e :. i^ ;; i. !r itr i. ,!, 1: \.: !r _ar !i I :. .:r i,1.3r \4 .\. !;';! !i !2 ?. i;:. ta rr i. ir i.: !a t, !r !: ii t: rr,:z i: ir :..:: !r Ls Br,;.1: tr iic:; t. tr,j !. :i.:2 i...' 12.1:l:L i l, j) ib !r rr ir !_ i.. :i i-ar birt ; :'t :"' t,d-r.,-'__t 1 :,i i ","Ii',' !':.j .!r,, r*Ai, .i-..:!i. '2' ii' !!'". !lrtti8n{ !r 12 r''.r 7..::r lsntltt: i. te:i,:r.:' ,, juxriTe.:r i! tr:>',. l, lir,$:sra ?..:j !, r. }i tlrtl0rl 1r:!::111' \' \1 tt 't'' t' it i^ te \t lz 1,.':t 1.'.1 1r:. i: !i :r '.' ii'tt ;r i. ir ii ia \. t. 'tr t, t. t. 1. '.., !. !r: ,:? ,i .r, ti !3 ,:, 2, ,!! SlORAGF tX:8.76 ;, 'kl r. :, flHi 3-75 fH:0.?5 r.J (, [H:4.?l /\n I GALLEKY ; .VEN} OPIN SELOY' 56t P104 ONESTOP DESIGN INC, oils70Plir*lFtr $S WLSHIRE BLVE *3IO LOS ANGELES CASOIO IHE INFOiMAIbN COMANEO IN THFMUflEM IN@RhRAIE6PEORFMY flGfS OF ONE SOF DEdGN. N PMIY ^CCffiNG ftISMCUMff SES S Itr CONFIBCEAD reREES ilAI fr *A[ Nd AENruCAIS IN MOLE M N P&T. MRNCLGM TO OIHRq ffHilI NE PdOR MN CONSM OF SE gOP comcF dE soP oE$cNlrr ALL &CHS RE*Wo gIE @NM€N6 TilD NOIry MEROFNdSREMCESMAB6E ORAWNGS PRIOR TO NY @N$RUCNON. TEMECULA RESORT & SPA DMT*XEM PW 11Wl ISSUE aB.o tr*' osD2i& lMM PHOTOMETRIC PIAN - GARAGE P3 SFbr aV bbl .2941 1M 9INGIE SINOLE Tobl bmp LuMs U kcdpflon l.A 0.@ &mn/n$ceE N.A. O.3S S'b/[EOSC.2+VS4 '\ r", .. ir r. t. 1 1 .. . i il i, 1. i i, !. \ 2? \, \. tr a.. 1. \: \\ \: 'J\ l,! \. :, i2 !: !r j,r !! ')r \; l;:3," f,. \ '.r at !,) 1. 1? 1: !1 \N i? \6 a2 tt ?:1', \)..' !FA'ti :!,:j i3 li i.21:j r,:roit i.:! i' ia :.: f,, t' rlL'0{! r. .,i .ri 36 ii :" r. r. !I,115 r, 5.71 5.21 Bd8.0 1.0 b.: rr ir lt is !;::1''-) z. l, \r a..jr 1r i. ?i 1. :i l: ii ii !, ',? r, . *Ko_ii :- . Ur: t.75 '.3 ii \:.2 !: ir i, !r ir t; 2! A.t'1s ",:! in i:'66 !, i. :rr:.1. i:1?:, ir,li li !i 'a. ar'ii 2. !r i2 ls !r ti:i :: l! :s :t, :s :,i i! !. ir i.i i€ 1i 11:! 7r. \r ''2 i.'tt it ii rr r! !i ;' r. :,"S,.61u r; ':1':i i: !: ir ir t.: i';; tr '.a 1: 1i /2 :j 1! i, i, i. 1? 1, :r 1. li ?r !o li t; ir ri :r lr l. i: !1 i! 1.: !e !. t. 2. \:! -1: \z 1t i1.t\':.; i|; \l l. :r :3 !. 1i 1: 'i.' 1! :6 ii, !t i!'r, !: :r i{ }3!it i. rr ?. i.,1.1i r" i.;,9|'Xlt;, :? :? :i. ir i. ii !a ii .rr :: t: :J :3 ;r tr i,, ?_, !i 2: !r 1. 1.ii !, t; 1i 2. \t,...2i !i !: lr !., t. !, 1.: ir 1, !J 1: ti: tr f. ii )5 t: t: t, t1 b! i, ,J: !. )6 1!'i. i,1,' i.l,t.:. i\ \i,...r.., !r t, ix;_ - .,; ?: :e :. ir 1._, ii ti ia .1:t.j: it :t: ii l3 !. ii n, :, ')1 \t \.' a::! ! i, : :r i !. ii i. l: ir r::a tr i' .! .. i. r,'fl . "Aitre.?s :: .j... : 1" hh.Crs is 1. :, i6 .," 1." t, Z, ""i 1t .\) at .:. i! ti ri i-, ;r !r i ?!'tq'.2 a.'t, \. \:':...2, t. !. i!,..n \2.r: \t \t a. \! 1e 1i.ri i- !:r l? 1r:: ?: tr :; 1,,:r:, ti t: ii) i; r. ,r'2r an.r,1r.,.1. +:t ,t 1z .!r,r \,: i ,. "/ \t tr 't, 1.. ':! tt, lt .)j 1. 't, .j ,2.:, i2 1i .rr .-a, .:t ,) \, t, / 1.'r' 1,. "1 i1 2.1:7. \i rr 1,.:.):.:r:! ii :j !.1, ..r,!, '!. r, \. t: :: 3.. lrF ;r ir 1. :.r :rl \. \J ,1t \,:, .r, z.\ .:. j j \ | !. ld ls ir !e i. :1 :.6 i? ! .tt \, .r. 1:i t. 1! :i 1i .r: .i, !; i :3 :.r r1 trEit \r 3r i. -1! :: :. !, ':FAlr !1 1 r :: :, .,. rj i3 !; ii r' r. fl'ilsr, 1i i. ..,: .,', L.ii;e{? l,t'.) 1. \t i. !:;,r..,: i.2! t,1r ii l_.1;,i STAIR":j 4.,'. ::'..c li i' i: !: 1r'.,';\ \.:1 1j,.;r.?: tr f . i. ':i !' ;, A. te l. 12 t, ,t \. \i i, :., ':: )r ;s 2.6.ii l: i i. i, i. a' ir iz ii t.3t tj i,'te !3 iJ';r:,,1r.,::i $1N:q15, : i. .i , l.; i:;. ., id ... : tl .. ,. !j ., r. \, i:..- :3:j 1r i:r !r: '?:r 1,r !i 1r :r: li i6.rr:€,?5.rj is:r 1;:, r , :. ,. r" flf,,410:, t, i, .. .. r. 'l;,,r.u ,, ,. .. ,. !? :B is t. !r i! t: !r 1.: a.'!L .4. \7 i,..rr .\a r. .5.2. i. 1r': i. :. i] re 1. !. t.1 :,. tr .( qy;0{: Iffilh R.rd t s8 lPafidq qr6rP3)_2@t -t&t4,Acl R.tsn tu: AdEs Cnno tuFn by: l.ml Avlna+eb /AppliqdoB E4lner$ounteil.: tu Di.SEb bmlnrt ScMub&rllgh L6 Fdr,Unl65 olffi .F& by.uslmrR@: @0/20 - Unls 0S6i&sFtu !ycldffirtuh:16m21 !@lnrlD &b b oaaln.d edtng b tES Fduri3u&. contdlod l.bddry condlton.. Fl.ld 6db ry ffi hm Mffirpdhls. ds to ftnyun@kdl.tr f.eB hdudlq but nol ttmhd b LIB Vo&S V.idon!, kmp Ptunc.. &il&t idFl 6, GD ttuF lnpd w&, T.nFr.to6 V.diltoil .hd Jd.& 6.d[onr. ':. tr lii'.1.:1: a, a'r 1r'z:.t., U. '.i \t \,: a, \x'i3.a< \r at i: tt a... il'rr ;. i' 15 ;1 3i :e :. 1!,PAl:. !! rn i. !' . r'{H:0.75 l. : r ':i ir !,! 'rr 12 i. )i :n i1 !,r ir 1- ;! i::: ir i:5r':,. tf !! :: nr !e i. .r- !: !, ,' n, t, 15 iJ ':J li r1 i, :4 1r i. ' '. wr-t3 , c \: to ": -r, 3, i, t., t. 2C ,2"i. i. )1 ?: !n !r 1r \r't" :: >2 ir )d',; 1J'...: 'zt :tr 1r \2:: ?!:. ){ ia td a. \e 1. \6 ?.::. i.r 11 l;16 :.1r:.1r:! !r:: ir i3 is 1i !t 1? !: ir rli :i !r 1,, !r it n2 ;? BA1:n !r i! ;: :? i" ffrr: o.r5 :: i: rr'7d i1 !5 l. :,r !: i ?( ir !,r. !3 tr t:1..!z !r :: t, t. t! it !r 1) t2 ?: io !. t2 ir';, !i le !,:::2 3! 1; t1 ie'i"r! ii !r;r r.:! ':! i! 1r t> 1r is !r i. ::j i" 1: r- -,, 'i{i,.9.7b. 1\ !: !? !- i6 !! i. 1') i, i3 !; ii !r 3: I . -tHig.?E :) 1. i' ;' 1r !i ;t :i i5 i.'3;;r ?' !5 ir !. ir 3(.rr'rr:" !; i. !6 i..:.ir::1.1, l. ii \: ii 1._ ii:5,.r i i, 1.. ,, t.1a \i'tz a^ 11:? 1.1:.r: 1: !r:i r0 !_- !. i; 16 12 t: i: !r !€ l.:, i,i li !; ii:, :, !" ti 1. ti ir r, \; ?r i. 't' ;" l' \' r' !' i' ii 'jr !: !! :! i. !6 !. i lj ie !! !r !.r ;! ir t1 1r !. 1, !r !r !1 tl te ir 1e :1 !: t: :: i; jlr , ? \1 1.,1,... ita ,t \. 7/ .!!a'tr 1r i: ':r 3: :i b? i3 BA1?o n: ?.. :3 :: 1.. !! 1, BT, rr ,. \2 az \! .e, i" ,?lDit t: !r 1, !r \1 4.. lj ,,, ??.\'11 i. r,al;o{9 t, r. ::, !.. ra n" ','tt,.9'1, i, .:, !.. r: ,, o" Jir*tl. !d :rr :r ix ,. ,. ii,!1., i; :: .:. i! i,i ,n 1z':3 1ix t: i. l,i i6 i!:r 17:' br 1! tr !n i.F:r:.r t::s il !1 l.c;! 3r !6:: tr !3 !. !_ ir i,1?.i:1i:r ?4 i: !,, ,t ':. \. 1, nr !r ti :s i !: !i it i? .:. t. tr \., a1 a, !. !: i. ,r !: t, 't.r. 2j:? i! !! :, a: !, 1,1 i: !: 1! !. tr! t: !j 1. !? )r ,j :\:z \.: ii \,) ti ir ir:! 13's':,. !j r,. n! t.: iz !? !r:? 3, ir i! !e ir ;: ?. i, !r i. !r i6 1! t, ir -,; 11 ?!:; tr r_7,.r:,s \c 1! i...: t ',t 1e 3: a, !! ir i:. tb !.r i2'!i t? !r.:! ri i5 1r i2:: t. ij::e:.;e i: i: !; i.i 1, t:1{ ,rr i. i.!. i?:i ii n. ie i.;: !1:f:, t::?i 'jf ir ij:, :t i. r" ir t. 'rr i. !. tr 'ri !r i.r !. :r :.: 1, * it.,.: r. ir !: ?. ir ... 1>t .1.) .:r i3 !r :tr :r 1! 1i:: !: br t? !: i? .j, ?. .!: , 'r! i1 !. !i :r i' ir !::i !r !? !: ir ):.i! t, !i t{ !! 3e i::u.:, iq }r. . uAt olt,t -. \.: i. .,rjff:e.t5 !. I.r 1r !. ri ! .l;i,b.i.d. r. :. ' i0 .., ,. .,iLAzst, i.::'sr !!;r';z 1r ir 1.:.7 \... a, l. t.: fl1,415;. rt !3 r' rz.,l ': ws-ta1,.r'rt !.le I 1. !, ir !q i, !! !r tr ts t,1!:r i, ii !,r io !. !6 r.;:,:12 ir !e 1. i !, i:;r,:3 1r i, 12: ';j \,, t3 \, 1i :. t i; ,'., t. ln 16 ;o t., !. .r. i-z \r i, t? tr ii !il 1r l! : 'r:1!'rr ir !:'trr tr.'i '.t \s tt a.1d ?i 1. li !r ir.r,1s i, i: t. t1 1;,1j r: i i" t1:"{: P105 It I t ! {Ihilido r 9lEFld st$ lwo \dfttrc oafs 88F0tr f1t tlc UNDERGEOUND SERYiCE ALER| ft0a-u2-4r3J CONSIRUCI|Cfr PtCoRl)DATT 8f RttslqNs tAtt *-,_*- t I 25 -- - ci inrNs Rjn "\-. *&.:?n*, ,Rqiily,v, '<4ai- 'cs' rxnnc rc /?{tiiltN: DFYI APPROICd PNOPCST' DROP lilLti ll Rr88cl{ lISr:ilG S]CI I0 GUiIIR 6 PROIECITO IN PUCI sit stalrcNs 0N sfita cc J tOi 0t't4t -tr 6is PROP0st0 }C PAI€MTNT tiDtNtNe txrst\c rtNa: Tc 8: PRoitcItD tN i'$!]i tdstlit{i UUtIs TMHINNT| A] 8r0s nc[ pr:0p0slD Dcu ott PR0PCSE 00Htsitc wAttR ililiH & 8iF & fDc PROPOS'D UNDSCAPE wAltR ritifR & $fpR0P0stD ) CURE & PRCPOSTD J'' DRiV' iPPR0ACI Ptfi Cii: Cti$rtcNs sTo i8tA RCWD UTILITY LOCATION DETA'L SCrti: t'=10 Pt0P05t0 PF0P0Srl PRCPOSTD 2' CRIND & J,,iFiAI pr0P R/w PROPOSI[ FUSL]C srcwiL(t8'nc? I l5 !rltl PUB|IC SIoRH ORAIil iATTFT ;3- 4r!:i- t "'2 i3= / -,- ixtsltNc CAL;FSS p'"ic tPllMct 0?tRf10w A ic F tlJ uJ&Fa ozo O Lua PROPOSIO CROP 1ILTT S'RUCTJRI t'lTHlN aiil Riclra-0r-llY T0 atpTURt cAiiF_nNs 'RANACI PRoPCst0 TRItwtlL p5a 6 ;t 7u!:rf,-e-* .'rg ,to 3= z) txlslixc tc e"J "":'"""' ,d;.{^!' ;'ac ,!s ^."i"-J PAT/:I;INT PRoFosff) CURB & CUiIIR PIR pRoPostD 24'lcF PUE{.{C SiaRu ORrsl M$ 41ry s;l I 30 StL SHEET CC.2 FOR CONIINUAIJON LFGFN OWNER ST:!f Y (LM LI,/INC iNUST l;85 tvtlsHtRt B0uLtvARD ri221l Los Ail6lrt5. cA 9001t aIIlli UP Sltvt Ktll crvrL ENG_tN -EEFrVALUID |NGJNIIRINE. iNC 600 N ilouNTmfl AVtNUt, SlJ'Ti Ct02 UPLAND, CA 91786 PHOllt: {-qtg) 982-4601 AITI]: I.iR, JTFF IJEI]ER EAEINWAEX Rr\il IXCAVAI0N: 27,4!10 CY M$ ll,4P0Rl: 5,200 Cy r{P0RI/tXP0Rl: 22.200Cy LEGAL DESCRIPTION@r$itcu* ptR u.8. 15. pA6t 726, R|C0R05 0f SA}J 'I[CO COUNTY, IN lIIt C]IY OF TEVTIULA. iOJXIY OF STN IiRNAROINO, STAiT OF CA|ITCRNIA. iNaiutNc vAc^Tt0 ALrirMy, BtccK 17 AilD ?ORTIONS OF VA'ATIO FRONT SNTN ANO I{ERCTDTS STRftI- FAS ENT EXISTING EASEMENTS O 1't -t4stuiNr ioR p0rt LtNts. coNDuits 0R UNotiGRouND FiclltTtr-s AND flitrtNlAl FUFp0sts irifAvcR 0r crt cALtFaR\it, RlccRJEo c5,rJC./J990 $ rNSl |0. sc-.r95s.17, dii- ' @ g.qq11q tcR sicN, Acctss i]tD tNoDrN*i ptJRpcsts tN tA,y,'R 0t auAtis AD),tRits,NG itc0^0r008/1411989 aS i\ST. NC. 89_271094. C.R. @ n':-eesiu:ltt FCF p.its AND ANcH0Rs rN_rAvor? ci iHt pAcrFrc Titip*.Nt ANIi rtrL.iRApH c0'pAfry,RIcoRDro 09/r/19it As 600{ 47c, pAct 11, cF }ttDs,1N0T pion$fti, - @ orr u,s[u:r- r0R_D0-!),N ra\.ji 0: Jrf souri:Ril 5l^RRAs rowlR LoMprrr pLa,:\)tri c6:29/1g??45 a:l( 5'1. P.CL i;, 0f DLLJ: .r,lJ rLO:li8 f.;- PROPOSED EASEMENTS O AN ilstMiNr ototcAlt0 r0 iHE cry 0f IIMrcuu FcR pu8l,c s1pta, AND untily puRpcsts @ nN tAs$,linr 0E0tc,JtD T0 RANCH0 CALttCRNtA i{ATIR otSTRtCr FC? puEltc UrtLtTy pj]Re0sts iilP:Rvious Pcc ISPIRTIOUS AC PAltVINI rrlPiR\{ous Ac CR]ND & OVTRL1Y SCALE 1'-20'PROJECT LOCATION IPNS: 922-072-005, -0C7, -0t0, -011, -0j1 015, -018 .0?0, 021 & D2a ADDRTSS: Nt CCRNTR 0r FRCNI S'IFtaI AND FIRSI srRttT, rtlt€cuG. cA GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION SPTC1IIC PLAN IIIPLTUTNT}] ON ctcl=-=-rr -cAic| lisrN 3l0c( wnr r DESIGN ----HriJ*----,* - --iln- -Xt ---fT------itBel ! f ---;I- +-lL:--+;l - -EFl-: rsf,r-----1-T-Sl=i)r'fl*---*E-r--rraD --- +ll* - I l0' PAD ELEVATIONS C) I I 1 ] [LtY/arRt,4t A 9 PROP ]?RIilTI'\ NIP PTOP KNOX SOX Pi0frsl0 t0 0R.\'I pfRotcH PtF DirlcToF crtc( PnoP o0liBrr 6 a rofltP Port r0 3t ntuo\tD (ryFj uilt i0 Ea ut0:R cR0tNctr)20' AIff*AY VACjI|ON RfC0R0t0 rN 3rcx a, PA6, 238_2J9 PRCICSI' 12'HDp: PF|{AE SIOIII I]RAN txrslirc p0wtR lotE t0 Bt R:ucltc (t?) {OVTRtsIAD I:NI Tc 8T UNDIR GROUNOIDJ P1 = '10O7.0O' BO.5 = '1002.50' 81 = 997.00' 81.5 = 992.O0' ?ROP LINDSCAPi lr4I[i tJufR & 5Fe 5q H cry cr uHtcJd sn 207A sat StcItN cH sflttl 4 acR It,vAIl0tis {r4D{) u0uNliD tm PnJ? Dolrtst!. wnriR ufitft & 8fp F= |F0tt)sat Jil' DflI.E trPRCtCr PtP cB ci llMtcut sl,i 20]i st-i stclt0il cx sHtF 4 toR tttvAt0ils Pr0fostD ntwtLL is P|OFCSID lU8|C srDt*Atk IXTST|NG PSVitR PoLt 1C BE R!il0vfo irYpl (ovERHtA, uNr rc sa uN0iF cRotlN0tD) ZgX'NG] gPTC]FIC PiAN ISP*5iUiiND USg' SPEclFlc PU\N IMPLIiIEMT:ON {SP]] N45 31'C5"t1 150.11' pc0P05t0 scRffiNwrIL _J 'x" 'x";0Nt suL-!D f,n;- trJRkli PROPOSIC P'iOPOSTD PUBLIC S:0{*tLKPROPOSTD 52 SI sloPto [t:kwAY -- GRAPHIC SCIE ilnTi, sit Sftn cc-J & i6 4 IIU i L, FJR cRoss srrtoNs 'O!lNIOiVN OVFFl.AY R.IICH MRK SCAL'Jet,gaed 9y CheckeC gl cfTroF rE/aEcotA DIPAEII\EN| 0, Pt)8t.8 WARKS '"o.6logo b 0. CG-1Aole Camptet.d-.-...,_ _"_ S.AI: al PrsE i$r) e62-.oo' 0ole_ RCJ M. 64696 RticuulNut, At: _ 1Att: Act{?tt1 8f: DAIF:P/FC4 \0W rt -Ntct@ 6 Pt81' ffiX, / W i&ttraR R.C.t. tto.1a22J PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PA22-0035 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRoNT SI. rE[4EcUu. cA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 SneetLo,_L 3 s = =di: E 3 -6 : -" s*'6;t_{ SN ;5 TilC VORKIHi OA\S E|ORE I'OL} D!6 WDER'ROUND SERVICE ALER| CALL TOLL fEE t-800-422-U3J COI'ISIRUCIION R$CORD MfF AY Rivlstqils DAit SEE SHEET CG.1 TION 13 SCALE 1"=20 "t---jl-i GRAPHIC SCALE N453:'05"W r50.11?RoPostc scR[N GlZ -Li Lo:.HiEo3 H,i Q 6): t3- s'tx6n[c REIAN]NG F LIJul Fa ozot)u(trl -n-T s,i.{ot-i-l --fYS3"s a5qi -Sssd Sr-s += TXISI:NC BLlL'r0lNc s ahsirNS AC ZONJNG, SPECJFIC ?LAN iSP.5IUND USE, SPECJflC iLANi[iPrttlENAl]ON tSp,) Pl\tutNi 1 G I G o)-. 1;_L.A r-nt 3..Y f -a:!:i =z:o JO, PROPOSTD 21' RCP PJBLIC STORH OffiN u{N L tlrsrNc ,t' fiFr*e TPTIWE I 3eER,'H Rtilovt ixlsiNc DRryE A'PR0|CH INO CONSTRUCT CURB & CUNTRPti crTY sr'. Nc. 202 I \;o: ser,ri loi-14njsl I PRoF0Sa0 SIDIFIIK 0r0 roH{ sPtcff PLiL OLD TOWN FRONT STREET ixisirNc ltytruy, ilmloYrl Sr0N PAWMTM ---fis+{e I -t LEGEND ilPTRVIOUS rcCpa\tiltNi |MPTRilOUS AC PAVEil[U IMPTRI1OUS AC GR]ND & OTIERiAY C!T'H BASIN Br0cx vrii b4 F ^ i, 4.1 t. .t i-lr < IRtiH!LL G 10 - srOtwa( PROP0SIC t I 4,! I l txtsirNc B' SL0f!0 WtL$tAY 5? SX PUC! 8t PRoTtCiit PfiOFY)S:D !2" HDPI SiSil '&rf r0 3t ts6 txrslilo FRt FYD&M .lH ZCNI 1' . ,.' ] .;l 1 l,i ::t: , ,, 1. I sM$D : , ' PROFCSID PC' srDMltk p0Rli0N 0r PUBllC RrcHl-0f-*AY IC 8t VA&itD PioFost! t2- HDPT SIORil ORIIN PAD ELEVATIONS L1 = 1OO7.17' RESTAURANT = 1o0s.s0. BANQUET LOUNGE = 1OO5.5O' GRAND BALLROOM = 100s,50, FROPOS'D PIISLiC aATCH StSt! t0 , :,,:: . '"a. -,.:f i:::,. , :L ,:- :.:,1." , ,' ::/ | . 4...........1". :,',: N0Tl : ff I llf,!'i;i &'"-' BEIIC\ IARK leeigned 8y Ch*ked 8,scA!a trcrn Ay cfTroF TE/WECOLA OTPART'ITNT OT PUBLIC 1lORKS rc.!1!90 CG-2hle bmpteted SL1L, ii::.r I I .ri', tl ----- mffi Frb-.: (Eo3) e&,.6o1 Dote_ 9.6.9. 11o. 64696 Pfc0ililtil0t0 8AI[: utt_ .",_ACCiPril g/:_"_ oana M%, P,t.ffictNUr'nkvffi/w€ftiliffn P.C.€ No. 1122J PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PA22-0035 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRoNT S', TE[4EcUu, cA 92592 SUBMITTAL #6 sher-!or_! n t Es Gd 3 s = =n 6 <:fl; as (,i TW? W0RNN6 DAyS RET'RE fil 01G CALi f.LL t-800-422-4iJJ UNDER'ROUND SERVICE ALEFT CONSTRUCilON EECARO ilr BY RE6SnilS A&'D DAT. 196.: 4 6 *s 1040 ! olt t0J0 1025 t020 r 060 r055 r 050 ?7 FtRg 4cats t015 0r16 sr6N 801x0 3I a e ! t{rsltNc l 10{0 :0J7.8i pRoPostl aRouNc CUR8 r 015 FR0P0St0 SCRE'N gA 10J5 r 010 10r0 I - aXEnNC i' srcn Boso I r rosi ) lu,*, R/s36' '96h:o r025 1020 TLOOR aArlRd{sl0'l0 r0.3 26 Fb?t lcctss r020 I I I I 12'lt'i0' I 000 FRoP0Stt cugE l0?0 l0r9.m E* E I I /t tEXrgrNC f -PA\{MfNT \ -----g9r - 3.50 iLmR arisnrc cmm0I015P1 5 995 ptoPcstD CURS r 015 r01J.50 1 015 i0r0 E/JSnN -.Giortro \ i" 2 CRfl0 & cv€RuY rt00R iuslM PROPOSO .C'CURB & 3!nEt0 s€ flt{0vto t0:0 990 SECTION A lLll 0 SECTION B 1 ":2O'SECTION C SECTION D 1":20' 1020 t 015 r01 51019.C0 rt00R 101 5 r 010 1005 IIt '0'J0 -10' Rq -Ed ixstilc EJitDrNC t010 *al 6 p z0 r0r 5 rc g: Et Ir010 scRtLN wlrt PROPOSEO SCFILiI {{L r006,5{ CM},D J0'10' 1006.50 20 riffi.a0 8{rRmu 8AM)UIi idjNca rcl0 I;ISIING AC PAvtMtlll I 005 L-,;; 6RCuNt r005 10c0 I I :xrsrNc |{ rAVIX0{T Qzt 1408.(n ru1").:m,I fxrslrNc J {ipourt pRoPosm & 'a' iuRB & !fmF.culltR .UNB & !U'iI!R SECTION E 1 ":2a'SECTION F 1 ":2a',SECTION G 1 ":2C' | -+ SECTION H 1"-20' 3 E E s rc05 1 0{c r 000 lhsigned B,0ro*, i,Checked 8ysaLt c/rr oF 7E/AEC.ALA D[P^R.rit[Nt 0f PUSLic $ARKS N".q!_!90 tule Cohpteted CG-3 STAL: ED Aoie_ 64696 RICOIIM{NDID Ar:- A$:-ALTP|ID 8I: PATM W, 4E,ffitct@ E tuqLt WKS / Ctil t$ilttR F.C.t. Na. 1122J PA22 0035 SECTIONS TEMECULA RESORTAND SPA FRoNT sT. TEMECUU, cn 9:592 SUBIIIITTAL i6 Sheel 3 of 4 Ed Is UNDERCPOUND SFRVICE ALERI C&L T&L Fffi 1.800122-4tJ cousnucil2N EE'0RD DAE 8Y RilSINS AE RTNCH UARK .lrl t'*3-A?t,t6f{j'+J0 12+40 12+s0 12+60 12+10 12+80 12+s0 13+00 1J+t0 1J+20 rr+Jo rJ+40 rJ+50 rJ+60 r;r70 '.reo i.rro ,** 'oi'o'"*ro ,..**., 1"=20' 1":4' t', .tl '1 I I rl I l I I I l Ll I ,il : ttl i.. ,] t0' fIRSI STRETI q J0't0' I I .t I I 2+40 2+50 2+mSECTION K '\L IXSnilCCROUND \ 'i :r- l t., l+20 1+J0 l+40 l+t{ l+60 t+70 I li, rJ10 R/w 't0.2' 2.5' i:i' !: ill 0+80 J0' SECOND SIRTTI q 0+70 ORIYE & J0' ] : ilrrnr : .i, i;r:1i.,, 1015 1010 I 005 I 000 rl 1040 . 'ii 0+m 10J5 1030 r025 1020 101 5 995 I :.. :l:,.; ],;L ! : ii,)t l ) .2)v.: -,:, l .r.i ::: l : i:. ,:,ii, .:: :.': l: : : il ,l i ti ri l':i : :,, ,li::] ,ll : +000+900+600+500+400+J00+200+10 oesigftd It 0nrh q Cheked 8ysalt orcv;ng No.cfrroF TaaEaaIJ DTPARIMENT OF PUELIC WARKS CG4 0l 0ote-@ RTCOEIIENDED ACNMO ME:- MIE:_8Yww.E-wtN6ww,/ww R.C.t. ilo. 1122J PA22-0035 TEMECULA RESORT AND SPA FRONT ST. TEMECULA, CA9259 SUBMITTAL #6 s*et 4 ota td F ts I g =d6$Fq€ 3; PR $s Ri 9E{3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA22-0037, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (TPM 38349) TO COMBINE TEN EXISTING LOTS INTO A SINGLE LOT LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF FRONT STREET BETWEEN FIRST STREET AND SECOND STREET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, AND 023) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 7, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22-0035 a Development Plan. On January 10, 2022, Steve Kim filed Planning Application No. PA22 -0037 a Tentative Parcel Map. These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. On September 6, 2023, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted to accept the staff recommendation of redesign of the project in order to comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. D. On May 15, 2024, the Project was considered by the Planning Commission at a duly noticed public hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing the Planning Commission voted for redesign of the project in order to further comply with the development standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on November 20, 2024, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA22-0037, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Parcel Map (Development Code Section 16.03.140): A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Parcel Map No. 38349 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, the Municipal Code, and the Old Town Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land, and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property that is suitable and designated for commercial development, which is consistent with the allowable land uses of the Old Town Specific Plan, General Plan, and Development Code. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map would combine ten existing lots into a single lot. The project site is physically suitable to accommodate a hotel and the required parking to meet the needs of the hotel. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. A Joint Projects Review #22-01-26-01 was completed for this project which determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and does not require for any acreage to be designated for conservation. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure compliance with the Building, Development, and Fire Codes. These codes contain provisions to ensure projects do not cause serious public health problems. Negative impacts are not anticipated. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). This map is for non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects); (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan policies and Zoning regulations including General Plan Land Use Policy 7.1 which encourages revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan and General Plan Economic Development Policy 6.4 which encourages development of lodging along the freeway. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. The JPR also determined that the project site did not contain any riparian/riverine/vernal pools on the site. The project site is not located within a narrow endemic plant species survey area or an area that requires additional surveys for plants. The property is not located adjacent to existing or proposed conservation areas. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project i s an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required ut ilities and public services. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 38349) to combine ten individual parcels into a single parcel located on the east side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A and Plan Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of November, 2024. Bob Hagel, Chair ATTEST: Matt Peters Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of November, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Matt Peters Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA22 -0037 A Tentative Parcel Map (No. 38349) to combine ten (10) existing lots into a single lot located on the east side of Front Street between 1st Street and 2nd Street Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-072-005 922-072-007 922-072-010 922-072-011 922-072-013 922-072-016 922-072-018 922-072-020 922-072-021 922-072-023 N/A (no new grading) MSHCP Category: N/A (no additional square footage) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (no additional square footage) N/A (non-residential) November 20, 2024 November 20, 2027 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (no additional square footage) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 4 Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 4 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan (SP 5). 5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 6. Subdivision Map Act. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and Temecula Municipal Code, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. 7. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 8. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. This project is within a 100-year Flood Hazard Zone. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. d. This project is within a Subsidence Zone. 9. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Final Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. Final Map shall include: a. Right-of-Way Vacation (Old Town Front Street) b. Right-of-Way Dedication (Second Street) 10. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 11. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 12. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 13. Page 3 of 4 Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Final or Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 14. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Caltrans; b. Rancho California Water District; c. Eastern Municipal Water District 15. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 16. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 17. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 18. Page 4 of 4 VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com November 21, 2024 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA22-0035, a Development Plan for an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden, and Planning Application No. PA22-0037, a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov . Sincerely, Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form, Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov 1 City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Temecula Resort & Spa (PA22-0035, PA22-0037) Description of Project: Development Plan for an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven (7) story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Project Location: APNs: 922-072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023 Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside The Planning Commission approved the above described project on November 20, 2024 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: (Section Number 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) Other: Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because hotels are an allowable use within the Downtown Core zoning designation of the Old Town Specific Plan. The project also meets all applicable General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. 2 The project is located within City limits and is located on a site that is 2.15 acres in size. The proposed project is substantially surrounded by industrial development, vacant land zoned for industrial development, and major roadways. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The proposed project is located on a project site that is located within an MSHCP criteria cell. As part of the entitlement on this site the project went through the HANS/JPR process with the Regional Conservation Authority in which JPR 22-01-26-01 determined that the project is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements and no conservation of land was required. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The proposed project was required to prepare a Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) that was reviewed and conceptually accepted for entitlement by City Staff as the WQMP meets the requirements of the City of Temecula. A traffic analysis was not required as part of this project as the proposed use is allowed within the Downtown Core zoning district of the Old Town Specific Plan, and there is nothing unique about this project that would trigger the need for a traffic analysis. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality as the project is an allowed use per the City of Temecula General Plan and the zoning district. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner Phone Number: (951) 506-5137 Signature: Date: Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA - 41000 Main Street- Temecula, CA 92590 – TemeculaCA.gov A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No.: PA22-0035, PA22-0037 Applicant: Steve Kim Project Location: East side of Front Street between First Street and Second Street (APNs: 922 -072-005, 007, 010, 011, 013, 016, 018, 020, 021, and 023) Proposal: Development Plan for an approximately 285,125 square foot, 350 room, seven story, full service hotel that includes an approximately 174,382 square foot parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and an outdoor wedding garden and a Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 38349) to combine ten existing lots into a single lot. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review and recommends that a Notice of Exemption be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects). Case Planner: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: November 20, 2024 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center, 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside , or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.