HomeMy WebLinkAbout072005 PC Agenda
Gwyn Flores
.m
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
July 20, 2005 - 6:30 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2005-052
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Guerriero
Roll Call:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Telesio and Mathewson
PUBLIC COMMENTS
.
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
. 1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 6, 2005
R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2005\07.20.05.doc
2 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for June, 2005
.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
3 Plannlnq Application No. PA05-0199, Consideration of Findinq of Public Convenience or
Necessity, submitted by Tarqet, to allow alcohol beveraqe sales. located at 29676 Rancho
California Road, Veronica McCoy, Associate Planner.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15
calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the
appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the .
appropriate fili ng fee.
Continued Items
4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0621, a Development Plan, submitted by Vandana Kelkar of
MCA Architects, to construct a 55,685 square foot shoppinq center with "Pad G" remaininq
vacant for a future restaurant use on seven acres of the twenty acre propertv; five acres will
be desiqnated towards future commercial uses, such as mini storaqe, and the remaininq
eiqht acres, which includes a portion of the creek channel, will be preserved as open space,
located on the southeast corner of Butterfield Staqe Road and Hiqhway 79 South, Christine
Damko, Associate Planner.
New Items
5 Planninq Application No. and PA05-0066, a proposed Tentative Parcel Map, submitted by
Vandana Kelkar of MCA Architects, to subdivide four commercially zoned parcels into seven
leqal lots with "Parcel 1" desiqnated as open space, located on the southeast corner of
Butterfield Staqe Road and Hiqhway 79 South, Christine Damko, Associate Planner.
6 Planninq Application No. PA05-0100, a Development Plan, submitted by Peter Mieqar, to
construct a one-story office buildinq totalinq 12.411 SqUare feet, located on the southwest
corner of Madison Avenue and Bueckinq, Christine Damko, Associate Planner.
.
R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2005\07.20.05.doc
2
.
.
.
7 Planninq Application No. PA05-0101 a Development Plan, submitted by Peter Mineqar, to
construct a two-story office/show room buildinq totalinq 23.618 square feel. located at the
end of the cul-de-sac of Madison Avenue, west of the Interstate 15 freeway, Christine
Damko, Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting; Wednesday, August 3, 2005, 6;30 PM, Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California,
R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2005\07.20-05.doc
3
.
ITEM #1
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JULY 6, 2005
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6;32 P.M., on
Wednesday, July 6, 2005, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Mathewson thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, and Chairman Mathewson
Absent
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comment.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION;
1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 1, 2005.
1.2 Approve the Minutes of June 15, 2005.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Consent Calendar Items 1.1 and 1.2.
Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who abstained from Item No. 1.1.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to modify the agenda to address Item Nos. 9
and 8 before Item NO.1
R:\MinutesPC\070605
New Items
At this time, Chairman Mathewson recused himself from the dais,
.
9 A General Plan Land Use Map amendment and minor text amendment of the General Plan
Land Use Element, to amend the General Plan Land Use desianation for properties within
the Meadowview subdivision from Low Density (Ll Residential and Rural Residential (RR) to
Very Low Density Residential (VL; two and one-half acre minimum lot size); and to insert
text into the Land Use Element related to land use compatibility. The action is intended to
confirm that the Meadowview development was intended to retain the Very Low (VLl
Density Land Use desianation that it had had from its inception
9.1 Recommend that the City Council approved the General Plan amendment.
9.2 Recommend that the City Council adopt a Notice of Exemption from CEQA, based on
consistency with the previously certified General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(EIR),
Deputy City Manager Thornhill presented a staff report (of written material).
The Updated General Plan changed the land use designation for Meadowview from very Low
Density (VL) Residential to Low Density (L) Residential; and one parcel from VL to Rural
Residential (RR). The unintended result was that the Low Density properties would only have
required a minimum lot size of one-half acre as opposed to 2.5 acres; and the RR property
would have been more restrictive, requiring a 5 acre minimum lot size. This amendment will
reestablish the previous VL designation (2.5 acre minimum lot size which has existing since the .
tract was found.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Mr. Thornhill noted that he is not aware of the
amount of undeveloped large parcels in Meadowview area at this time.
Commissioner Chiniaeff also asked if staff would be referring to all the property which is
currently all developed becoming substandard, or would staff be referring to all the undeveloped
property that could be parcelized in Meadowview.
Understanding the process of what staff is requesting from the Planning Commission,
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that it would be his opinion that what the Planning Commission's
position would be, at this time, would be to make a recommendation to the City Council as to
what the designation should be.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
The following individuals spoke in favor of staff recommendation for the following reasons;
. Ms, Christie Johnson
. Ms. Diana Lovett-Webb
. That there would be a concern for parcels that are sub-divided causing more homes
(property lot 544, 9-acre parcel)
. Water flow of the existing Federal and State jurisdictional waterways
.
R\MinutesPC\070605
2
.
.
.
. That the Meadowview area should be maintained as it was originally intended to be.
Mr. Thornhill noted that the intent of staff recommendation would be to return to what the
original intent was (including 9-acre parcels).
The following individuals spoke in opposition of staff recommendation for the following reasons;
. Mr. Mike Kuhn
. Ms. Diana Broderick
. That language not be added to increase the hardness to have any road built across the
Meadowview if the need would arise
. That the Planning Commission should be suspicious of any proposed change that would
be based on falsehood
. That it would not be appropriate to approve a determination declaring Meadowview sub-
division as VL density Residential when it would not be factual
At this time, the public hearing was closed,
Commissioner Chiniaeff asked if zoning all of Meadowview 2.5 acres minimum lot size, would
create substandard lots for undeveloped property. He questioned whether these lots could
receive building permits.
Assistant City Attorney Curley explained that Meadowview Zoning has not changed, because
the consistency zoning recommendation was not passed. He explained historically staff has
reviewed these properties on an individual basis. If the Commission were to suggest a change
to the zoning, he recommended following the regular process, especially as it relates to Zone
Change and CEQA requirements.
Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that residents are confused regarding current zoning due to the
existing lot sizes, varying from Y, acre to 2.6 acres. He suggested that zoning regarding
developed lots be made applicable to what is existing, and undeveloped parcels should go
through the process and be zoned to appropriate levels; thus avoiding substandard lots.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments, Assistant City Manager Thornhill noted that
the process of a Zone Change is extremely important. If it is the Commission's direction to
suggest smaller lot sizes for Meadowview, a concerted effort needs to be made by staff to meet
with the Homeowners Association and property owners in Meadowview, with all noticing and
CEQA requirements strictly adhered to.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Assistant City Attorney Curley responded that if
it were the desire of the Planning Commission to move forward with the text as it would relate to
land use compatibility and deny the General Plan amendment it would be in the purview of the
Commission. I
Commissioner noted that' he would desire clarification on how many undeveloped parcels
remain in Meadowview,
R\MinutesPC\070605
3
The Commissio'n expressed concern with moving forward with the GP amendment as it would
related to the large parcels that have not yet been developed, in that they would be limited to .
2.5 acres.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that the L-1 under the General Plan would be 1 to 2.5
parcel size; and 2.5 in the current zoning; and that a person would have a right to build but
would not be able to subdivide,
Commissioner Guerriero concurred with Commissioner Chiniaeffs comments.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved deny the General Plan amendment for properties
within Meadowview; that the City Council move forward on all land use compatibilities with the
exception of Meadowview; that the City Council revisit and reanalyze from the beginning of the
General Plan amendment to the zoning what the designation for Meadowview should be on the
GP; noting that the GP is not consistent with the lot sizes that are currently out there, and that
the concern would be to making it consistent with what has always been out there (half-acre
minimum parcel size); that the GP and consistency zoning must reflect this. Commissioner
Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception Chairman
Mathewson who abstained.
. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN
THE "MEADOWVIEW TRACT FROM LOW DENSITY (L)
RESIDENTIAL AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL (RR) TO VERY
LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL; AND INSERTING TEXT
INTO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT RELATED
TO LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
.
At this time, the Planning Commission recessed for a five-minute break.
At this time, Chairman Mathewson returned to dais but will be abstaining from the Meadowview
zoning.
8 Plannina Application No. PA05-0085. Citywide Consistency Rezonina. to amend the
Official Zonina Map for the City of Temecula to be consistent with the recently amended
General Plan Land Use Map
8.1 Recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the Official Zoning
Map of the City of Temecula to conform with the recent/amendments to the General
Plan.
8.2 Recommend that the City Council adopt a Notice of Exemption from CEQA, based on
consistency with the previously certified General Plan Environmental Impact Report
(EIR).
.
R\MinutesPC\070605
4
.
.
.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill presented a staff report (of record).
.
Due to no speakers, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation with the exception
of the Meadowview rezoning (which would retain low density land use designation).
Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Chairman Mathewson who abstained.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA AND AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE
TITLE 71 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ACHIEVE
CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROVISIONS AND
REQUIREMENTS OF THE UP DATE CITY GENERAL PLAN
(PA05-0085)"
At this time, the Planning Commission returned to the regular agenda.
2
Plannina Application No. PA05-0044, a Development Plan (Charleston Product Review at
Haryeston), submitted by Matthew Faaan representina Meritaae Homes, for 106 detached
sinale-family homes on Tract Maps 31053 and 31053-2, located south of Date Street and
north of Haryeston Drive
Associate Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record). Staff also requested that
MSHCP category be changed to impose; exempt per Development Aareement.
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with side elevations as they would be seen from
major arterialslpublic view, and is of the opinion that rear enhancements should be
implemented.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern, Associate Planner Damko stated that staff is
of the opinion that the proposed project has four-sided architecture.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Scott Redsun, applicant, requested to modify Condition of Approval No. 14, adding the
language...or as approved, by the Director of Public Works.
I
For the Commission, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that the applicant, staff and Deputy
Public Works Director Parks, could work together regarding the request to Condition of Approval
No: 14 and to allow for adequate driveway paths and to break up it up with landscaping.
R:\MinutesPC\070605
5
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern regarding side elevations, Mr. Redsun noted
that he would be willing to work with staff to add more architectural enhancements to all rear .
elevations in the public view,
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation with the condition
that the applicant work with staff and architecture regarding Condition of Approval No. 14 and
that the applicant work with staff to add more architectural elements to all rear elevations in
public view. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0044, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PRODUCT REVIEW)
FOR 106 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES
LOCATED ON TRACT MAPS 31053 AND 31053-2, SOUTH OF
DATE STREET AND NORTH OF HARVESTON DRIVE
3 Plannina Application No. PA05-0045. a Development Plan (Aberdeen Product Review at
Haryeston), submitted by Matthew Faaan' representina Meritaae Homes, for 92 detached
sinale-family homes on Tract Maps 31053-3 and 31053-1, located south of Date Street
and east of Ynez Road
.
Associate Planner Damko presented a staff report (of written material). Staff also requested
that MSHCP category; be changed to impose exempt per Development Aareement.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Scott Redsun, applicant, noted that there are no single story residences but that there are
significant single-story elements,
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Redsun stated that he will work with staff to ensure enhanced
sides and rears.
Commissioner Chiniaeff also thanked the architects for a job well done.
Chairman Mathewson also thanked the applicant's efforts with the proposed project.
Commissioner Telesio noted that he had worked with the applicant and staff and that the
applicant has complied with all concerns.
At this time, the public hearing was closed,
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to
modification to Condition of Approval No. 14 and that the applicant work with staff on rear
elevations, Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous
approval.
.
R:\MinutesPC\070605
6
.
.
e
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0045, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PRODUCT REVIEW)
FOR 92 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES
LOCATED ON TRACT MAPS 31053-3 AND 31053-1, SOUTH
OF DATE STREET, NORTH OF HARVESTON DRIVE, AND
EAST OF YNEZ AND WEST OF HARVESTON DRIVE.
4 Plannina Application No. PA05-0130 a Minor Conditional Use Permit, submitted bv Ross
Brennan of Studio 440, for a thirty-five foot six inch tall satellite antenna, satellite antenna
base structure, new aenerator enclosure, revised parkina and hardscape area. and
additional landscapina for screenina of satellite antenna to an existinq structure to be used
by the Outdoor Channel for future broadcastinq. located at 43455 Business Park Drive
Associate Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record).
. That Condition of Approval No. 11 be deleted (eliminate all the proposed compact
parking spaces shown on the site plan); noting that the applicant will be meeting the
required parking requirements
. That a Condition of Approval be added that would impose that the developer shall
provide the Community Seryices Department with verification of arrangements made
with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Ross Brennan, architect for the proposed project noted that the whole team was available
for any questions.
For Commissioner Telesio, Mr. Brennan noted that although there may be a possibility of a Lurp
Disease for the proposed Eucalyptus trees, it would be consistent with the business park.
For the Commission, Deputy City Manager Thornhill relayed that the Commission could direct
staff to work with staff and the City's landscape architect to find an alternative plant species.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
modification of Condition of Approval No. 11; the addition of the condition as requested by staff;
and that the applicant and staff work with the City's landscape architect to find alternative tree
species other than the Eucalyptus tree. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice
vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-46
A RESOLU;TION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0'130, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A
R\MinutesPC\070605
7
THIRTY-FIVE FEET SIZE INCH TALL SATELLITE ANTENNA,
SATELLITE ANTENNA BASE STRUCTURE, NEW
GENERATOR ENCLOSURE, REVISED PARKING AND
HARDSCAPE AREA, AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING FOR
SCREENING OF SATELLITE ANTENNA TO AN EXISTING SITE
LOCATED AT 43455 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE. THE
SATELLITE AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURES WILL BE USED
BY THE OUTDOOR CHANNEL FOR FUTURE BROADCASTING
.
5 Plannina Application No. PA05-0056, a Minor Conditional Use Permit. submitted by Lon
Bike of Architectural Team3, to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type
47 On-Sale General- Eatina Place) from an existina buildina, located at 42072 5th Street
Associate Planner Fisk presented a staff report (of written material),
Due to no speakers, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval,
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0056, A REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF BEER, WINE,
AND DISTILLED SPIRITS (TYPE 47 ON-SALE GENERAL -
EATING ESTABLISHMENT) FROM AN EXISTING BUILDING
LOCATED AT 42072 5TH STREET, GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF 5TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200
FEET WEST OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 922-035-023
.
6 Plannina Application No. PA05-0171. a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
submitted by Michael McAuliffe of the Interactive Desian Corporation. to construct and
operate a 25,274 sauare foot mixed-use retail and residential buildina consistinQ of
approximately 4,700 sauare feet of retail space and 24 affordable apartments units on 0.48
acres, located at 41925 5th Street
Associate Planner Fisk presented a staff report (of record), requesting that a Condition of
Approval be that would impose; all outdoor furniture shall be of a high quality, durable materials
suitable for outdoor use and shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning;
materials shall be in conformance with the Old Town Specific Plan, which requires wood, metal,
or natural looking materials; and that plastic patio furniture is prohibited.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael McAuliffe, noted that he has enjoyed the opportunity to create an historic building.
.
R\MinutesPC\07060S
8
r
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
. Thanking the architect for all their efforts in bring such a phenomenal building to Old Town, the
Planning Commission expressed their excitement toward the proposed project.
MOTION: Commissiilner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
added Condition of Approval as requested by staff, Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the
motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0171, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE FOUR-
STORY RETAIURESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH RETAIL ON
THE FIRST FLOOR AND A TOTAL OF 24 RESIDENTIAL
APARTMENT UNITS ON THE SECOND, THIRD, AND FOURTH
FLOORS. THE BUILDING TOTALS 25,274 SQUARE FEET ON
A 21,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF 5TH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET WEST OF
MERCEDES STREET KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS.
922-024-012 AND 922-024-013
.
7 Plannina Application No. PA05-0016. a Develooment Plan. submitted by James Durfey of
Marble Express. to construct a 17.421 sauare foot sinale-story industrial buildina to be used
for display and storaae of marble and aranite on a 1.1 acre site in the Liqht Industrial Zone,
located at 42068 Winchester Road
Senior Planner Papp presented the Planning Commission with a staff report (of written record),
advising that staff received a letter from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians who have
requested that thee following three Conditions of Approval be added to the Conditions of
Approval;
. That prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer shall enter
into a pre-excavation agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. This
agreement would address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human
remains that may be uncovered during construction and ground-breaking activities
. That the landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all
sacred items, burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project
site to the Pechanga band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition
. And that all sacred ~ites within the project boundaries are to be avoided and preseryed.
Mr. Papp relayed that he has spoken with the applicant and that he would be in concurrence
with added the requested three Conditions of Approval.
. Due to no speakers, the public hearing was dosed.
R:\MinutesPC\070605
9
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the three
added Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote .
reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2205-49
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO.PA05-0016, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 17,421 SQUARE FOOT
SINGLE-STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDING TO BE USED FOR
DISPLAY AND TO STORE MARBLE AND GRANITE BUILDING
MATERIALS ON A 1.15 ACRE SITE IN THE LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL (L1) ZONE, LOCATED AT 42068 WINCHESTER
ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-
310-008
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
Commissioner Chiniaeff requested that the weeds be removed at the gas station at the Corner
of Del Road and Rancho Road.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Deputy City Manager Thornhill noted that he will consult with the
City Attorney regarding the City's options in handling Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern,
Commissioner Guerriero noted that Lowes has been using their fire lanes for display material in .
front of their business and requested that Code Enforcement explore this violation.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Deputy City Manager Thornhill introduced newly hired Associate Planner, Veronica McCoy.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8;20 P.M., Chairman Mathewson formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular
meetinQto be held on Wednesday, July 20, 2005 at 6:30 P.M., in the City Council Chambers,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dave Mathewson
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
.
R\MinutesPC\070605
10
.
ITEM #2
.
.
.
.
TO:
FROM;
DATE:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
Planning Commission
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
July 20, 2005
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for June 2005.
Date
June 30, 2005
June 30, 2005
Attachment:
Case No.
PA05-0086
Proposal
A Development Plan application for
a proposed 6,806 square foot auto
service building, located at the
southwest corner of Commerce
Center Drive and Via Montezuma.
A Development Plan to construct a
7,000 square foot office building on
0.74 acres, located at41919 Moreno
Road.
PA04-0470
1. Action Agenda - Blue Page 2
R:\DIRHEAR\M EMO\2005\6-2005.doc
Applicant
Russell Rumansoff,
Herron and
Rumonsoff
Architects
Joseph Porras,
Front Street
Architects
Action
Continued
July 7, 2005
Approved
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ACTION AGENDA
R :\DIRHEARIMEMO\2005\6-20D5.doc
2
.
.
.
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 30, 2005 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white "Request to Speak" form should be tilled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item NO.1
, 1:30 PM
Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
PA05-0086
Development Plan
Auto Service Center
Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff Architects
A Development Plan application for a proposed 6,806 square
foot auto service building.
Southwest corner of Commerce Center Drive and Via
Montezuma
Categorically exempt per CEQA Section 15332, In-fill project
Christine Damko
CONTINUED TO JULY 7, 2005
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
Item No.2
Project Information
Project Number
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
PA04-0470
Development Plan
Moreno Road Office Building
Joseph Porras, Front Street Architects
A Development Plan to construct a 7,000 square foot office
building on 0.74 acres.
41919 Moreno Road
Categorically exempt per CEQA Section 15332, In-fill project
Stuart Fisk
APPROVED
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
C:\Documents and Settings\Kathy.Simpkins\Local Settings\Temporary Internet FiJes\OLK2J\06-30-05 Action Agenda.doc
I
{ j
DH RESOLUTION NO. 2005-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-
0470, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 7,000
SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON 0.74
ACRES LOCATED AT 41919 MORENO ROAD (A.P.N. 921-070-
013).
.
WHEREAS, Joseph A. Porras, AlA, representing Front Street Architects, filed Planning
Application No. PA04-0470, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No, PA04-0470 was processed including, but not limited to
a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No.
PA04-0470 on June 30, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Director Hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA04-0470 subject to the
conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA04-0470 conformed
to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, and the Old Town Specific Plan;
)
NOW, THEREFORE, THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
.
Section 1.
by reference.
That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No.
PA04-0470 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.010:F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposal is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan, which allows for a variety of land
uses, including offices, in the Tourist Community Commercial (CC) designated area of the
Specific Plan. The proposal is also consistent with the development standards for the
Community Commercial land use district of the Specific Plan. Commercial buildings are land
uses found in the Community Commercial land use designated area within the Old Town
Specific Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings
be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with
nearby commercial buildings and is designed to be aesthetically and functionally compatible
with commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site.
8, The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0470 Moreno Road Office Building\FINAL Reso & COAs.doc
1
( i
.
, \
.
.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project is categorically exempt from
environmental review (Class 32 - In-Fill Development) pursuant to section 15332 of the California
Environmental Quality Act. Section 15332 applies when there are no potentially significant
environmental constraints on the site; the project is consistent with the General Plan designation
and zoning regulations; the project is located on a site within the City limits, which is seryed by all
utilities; and the project site is less than 5 acres in area.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of T emecula Director of Planning hereby conditionally
approves PA04-0470, a Development Plan to construct a 7,000 square foot office building on 0.74
acres located at 41919 Moreno Road (A.P.N. 921-070-013) with conditions of approval as set forth
on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference,
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Director of
Planning this 30th day of June 2005.
Don
I, Kathy Simpkins, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that DH
Resolution No. 2005-007 was duly and regularly adopted by the Director of Planning of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 30th day of June, 2005.
~4~~
Ka y Si kins, Secre ary
R:\D P\2004\04-0470 Moreno Road Office Building\FINAL Reso & COAs.doc
2
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
I
,
I
I
i CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
I PLANNING DIVISION
I MEMORANDUM
TO:
I
Planning Commission
FROM:
Veronica McCoy
DATE:
July 12, 2005
SUBJECT:
Planning Application No, PA05-0199 a Consideration of Finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity to sell wine at the existing Target store, located at
29676 Rancho California Road.
GENERAL PLAN: Site: Community Commercial (CC)
North: Community Commercial/High Density Residential/
Residential/Open Space
South: Commercial/Open Space/Professional OfficelHigh
Density Residential
East Community Commercial/High Density Residential/
Open Space
West Community Commercial/Highway Tourist
. Community
ZONING:
Site: Specific Plan -2(Specific Plan)
North: SP-2
South: SP-2
East: SP-2
West: SP-2
LAND USE: Site: Target
North: Temecula Town Center
South: Temecula Town Center
East Temecula Town Center
West Temecula Town Center
BACKGROUND
On December 23, 2003, Target submitted an application (PA03-0726) for a,Minor Conditional
Use Permit to sell alcohol from its existing store located at 29676 Rancho California Road, On
April 21, 2004 the Planning Commission denied the application. The applicant appealed the
Planning Commission decision to the City Council on November 23, 2004. The City Council
upheld the denial.
.
G;\Planning\2005\PA05~Ol99 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft.Resolution Letter.doc
I
Subsequent to these denials, the Development Code Use Matrix (Section 17.08.030) was
amended. The amendment to the Code now permits the sales of alcohol in Department Stores .
with the approval of a Public Convenience or Necessity Findings when the following findings
can be made:
a. Whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the general plan and
development code.
b. Whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and
character of adjacent land uses.
c. Whether or not the proposed use would have an adverse effect on adjacent
land uses.
d. Whether or not the proposed use would result in an excessive number of
similar establishments in close proximity.
This new ordinance took effect on June 9, 2005.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project is a request by Target to sell wine (Type 20 license, off-sale wine) in an
existing retail commercial store, located at 29676 Rancho California Road. The Development
Code states that any business selling beer and wine shall be no closer than 500 feet from any.
public park, religious institution or school. Staff's policy for measuring the 500 foot separation
from religious institutions and schools, is from the nearest door of either use. Parks are
measured from the nearest door of the proposed use to the closest property line of the park. .
The GIS department has provided the necessary maps and staff has verified that the proposed
use is not closer than 500 feet from any religious institution, school or public park. There are
two parks in the Yicinity, the Duck Pond (approximately 800 feet from door to property line) and
the Margarita Community Park (approximately 800 feet from door to property line). There is one
religious institution located on the south side of Rancho California Road; however it is
approximately 700 feet from the entrance of Target to the entrance. of the religious institution.
Target Corporation is requesting that the Planning Commission make a Finding of Public
Convenience or Necessity to authorize retail sales of alcohol at the Target store located at
29676 Rancho California Road.
The proposed project requires a Type 20 license for off-sale beer and wine. Staff has verified
through the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) that the project site is within Census
Tract 0432.16. Currently a total of 12 Type 20 licenses exist in said tract; and 5 are allowed
before it is considered to be over-concentrated by ABC. Since this Census Tract is over-
concentrated with Type 20 licenses, Public Convenience or Necessity Findings are required,
RECOMMENDATION
Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is consistent with
the General Plan and Development Code, and is compatible with surrounding uses. The project
will not have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses and will not result in an excessive number
of similar establishments in close proximity. As a result, staff recommends that the Planning
Commission consider the information presented above and approve findings for Public
Convenience or Necessity for this project.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~Ol99 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Letter.doc
2
.
.
.
Attachments
1.
Vicinity Map - Blue Page 4
2. Zoning/General Plan' Map - Blue Page 5
3, Radius Map - Blue Page 6
4. Letter from Target Corporation - Blue Page 7
5. ABC License Types and Summary and Census Tract Map - Blue Page 8
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0199 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Leuer.doc
3
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~Ol99 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft~Rcso]ution Letter.doc
4
)
\.../
PA05-0H 99
.
, ,.'.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
ZONING/GENERAL PLAN MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0199 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Leuer.doc
5
PA05-0199
.
General Plan
.
'"
x x x
.x ...~:.:.x. x
"'x",." x x
';'\".:.' x "nl:
.. . PR...". x-'X-
..~.".."...;~x x x x
.'::. .<.x. x x x
x x
-
.
Zoning
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.3
RADIUS MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0199 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Letter.doc
6
City of Temecula PA05,0199
/
./
Ii
,
\
/
. /
\/
\
I
I
I
i
L___.._ _ '_, _~ ,/
/ --~ ',,- " /
/ -- l .........._"-............... /,'
I \; 'l. ~ , , ,. !
'-.' / ..-......... ""'': -.......~ I / I
'~ / ~,,!!!I!l.it--~;, /\ ~"\ __
/ ~~,/\ \ ....... ............<.', .\--/'-
// ^' \. \ /--~--......,,", \ / .-----
/.J \. ~ ./ \ \ v"'/ ..,) \\-.../,>/ _.~ /_____
1 / ''-v/ \ \ /\ / \ "._-/' ..//~
'/' " ,y\ ./ ,)//'
'f, .----------~\ /' ,,\ Y ;> // _/ /,//
---- \ '\/\ -/ /~/--/
, \ ,'v, '\ \~ / //
~ \ I 'c, · /^~,\ (////.Y'\
/- /i El\ \,___i \, J )'~>;:/ \ ~'-
. ,- " \ -'-'--'\., '" ./ /,/ \, cf1S
:>-- \ ',If \ \ /' /<...~<<;Q~/~~A't-.ifl'
( \ \ \ \ '" // Y ~/ ',~ -<"'"
\ ": \ /" >1 V ,.v~o;/ '. ~_/
\v~--\ \ V ',,- \ ~d'~ "'-../ i
\". \ 1\ \ ) \ . X', ~// \ "', ,....---/---_____________
\. --/ /' / " /, \ "./ --~
\ \ \ --- .,/",.,/,/. /\\. //'/'/// ~ \, --/// ----.....
~.~~ \ \ \/./ 'r' \. '. .
\--.......~~-::\. \ 'V / \. / -' /'
\ '\ \ \ \"'\. ( //// /
\, \ \, \ ,//)" \"..///
\ ...<', \ \' C ,';,//' 1
-~/ - -- \ \ (/', /
~~ , \ / '" /y ~
/\ \:' >\\ /~V/
\ \-"'/ \ \ \..../" //
\ \ \ ./'
\ / X
..\ //./'\.,
1.------- // /// r'~"" -"''-_
\ :/ / ./\, . ~
'/ /. ,/ \ "~.
,/.// \ ')
.-./~ /./ "/ "..'.
// ..... Q'/A,".."
/ (/ '/~/ ""~,, y~:/
:/ \ / ~.flp. ,~ <<;
, ;;.~. ,y( i j.. ,
7\1 _ )/"
\. .s . \: / ---'/1.""'",",,
\ /~/~ \// I / // ", '-" '.,"'"
I I 1/ \ ' I . ',~ '"
,--~--_r-'i I 1\ I l \ ' " "'-
\ \ /// 1\" \\\ ',,-"-,,""-,
\ '. ! i / I \ \ \ \. ".. ',,'" /
\ \ I ( f '\ /--"'\ \ \ " ",,<
\ I I. ! I\....\ \, '-, " "'"
--------<!
r'
, '-"'.
"-
"-
/-..........,-,-
\ ~/--;;
\ \ 11
;. 'L---.......
'i \ rJ ?
t '" '"
! ! '\
\ .
,/
I
/
/
,/
I
l.
,/ '.....
/ '.....
/
.........
.~.
i"~-
,
I
!
,
---~----_/
/
-.'--..r-----f~-~(
; i "1
I . !
/
,I
!
!
,
I
,
I
,
----~
,
,
!
i
i
i
L----
/\I Highways
/\ / Streets
[~~] Parcels
b::,:~1 Parks
DCity
N
A
200
,
o
400' Feet
/
200
ThismapwasnllldDbyltleCltyolTemecUaG&ogaphie
InfoonatiCl'lSys1ernThemapls~rrornbaslldala
pn'll1IoedbylheRiwtsideCotriyAssessot'sOeplwtrnenl
ancIlheT~CI'Inl81dMiregemertIqllOf
oIRiversideCol.ny.TheCilydT~_no
WOOBI1tyU"legall'tlSpOnstilitylorltwlirtolmlititJleootainld
onltli5map.Dalaa1dirit:lrmaliMRIpIMWIIIldCl'l~map
antsuqectloupclaloiWldl'l'llldibtion.TheGflo9'ilp/il:
IrtormalionSy$lemandoltllrSCUCll$sIloljdbllqueriedlorlhe
moslo..mlfllinforrnalion.Tlismapisrdrcr~Otresale.
'~A03Qns.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.4
Letter from Target Corporation
.
.
G:\Planning\200S\PA05-0199 Target PC:& N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Letter.doc
7
.CALlFORNIA STREET, SUITE 1001 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 TEL: 415.362.1215 FAX: 415.362.1494
June 13, 2005
By Mail and Facsimile
-~\
_-c..' "i!!'\,,\\
t~~J r (,::- '~. 1 \\ \\
.. JUN 1 5 2005 ,.~):;
!.
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
Planning Department
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
:-;;1
.,......-. ...-'
. .-' ~".'
Ro' Application for Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
Target Corporation, dba Target, 29676 Rancho California Rd., Temecula 92591
Dear Ms, Ubnoske:
Pursuant to our recent telephone conversations, Target Corporation is resubmitting its
request for a determination of public convenience or necessity to allow sales of beer and
wine at its store at 29676 Rancho California Road, in Temecula. The following is a brief
explanation of Target's intended operations,
.
Target Corporation has applied to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for a Type
20 off-sale beer and wine license, While the license applied for permits sales of beer and
wine, Target will begin initial operations with sales of wine only, perhaps adding beer at a
later date. The wine will be displayed in the grocery section of the store, along with the
other food and beverage products that Target sells.
The operations of the store will remain essentially the same as they are now, without the
sale of alcoholic beverages. The hours of operation, types of vehicular traffic, number of
people involved (both as employees and as customers), outdoor activities and other
operational aspects of the store will be unchanged, Alcoholic beverage sales will account
for a small part of overall sales revenues at the store, Target projects that sales of alcoholic
beverages will account for approximately 3-5% of sales at the licensed premises.
Target plans to offer consumers an assortment of moderately priced California wines.
Adding wine sales will provide a convenience to Target's customers by eliminating the need
for an additional shopping trip ~lnd will allow Target to be competitive with other businesses
selling beer and wine. t
i
If you have questions about Target's proposed operations or need any additional
documentation, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
3ztll0avf~'
. Beth Aboulafia U ~
t~~~rt,
~<<;.'''-;,''tt~~
f.~,,',1-\~.)*,.;--
i1~0~;r(;f!:}J:}t ':,.<",
. . .;?( 1?r ~,'lh..",~ :R:.....J_.
,::~;;~(~f,;.j;.!~~):1;;r?~;!
, ~~ >,- :
,. ~'. ,:. -'
':.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.5
ABC LICENSE TYPES AND SUMMARY AND CENSUS TRACT MAP
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0199 Target PC & N\Planning\Draft-Resolution Letter,doc
8
2000 Census Tract Boundaries
~
o
3000
I
6000 Fe,et
~ !
N
A
r:\gis\census data\census2000.apr
.
ITEM #4
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
MAY 18, 2005 STAFF REPORT
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Planning Commission
Christine Damko, Associate Planner
July 20, 2005
Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center, PA 04-0621
Background:
On May 18, 2005 the Planning Commission took public testimony and considered a proposed
Development Plan to construct a 55,685 square foot shopping center located at the southeast
corner of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. The Commission commented on how
the rear of the buildings needed additional architectural features as well as the common area
near the front of Shop D.
The application was subsequently continued off calendar due to last minute letters from the
South Coast Air Quality Management District and the California Department of Fish and Game
regarding the Initial Study.
Architectural Changes:
The applicant has added architectural enhancements to the rear elevations of Building B, C, and
D such as: glass windows on the east side of Building D, pop-outs ranging from one to two feet,
decorative tile accents, and a decorative canopy extending three feet over loading doors. These
enhancements break up the mass of the rear elevation and provide architectural detailing. The
proposed development of the self-storage facility (Phase II), will block these rear elevations from
public view.
The applicant has also provided additional architectural enhancements to the front of Shop D. A
solid awning will extend out ten feet from the building to provide shade for customers. Flowering
annuals, additional trees, potted plants, chairs and tables add to the pedestrian friendly common
area that will be noticed when customers drive into the shopping center.
Environmental Agency Concerns:
;
The California Department 'of Fish and Game could not review the project in its entirety due to a
lack information on the MU,ltiple Species Habitat Conseryation Program (MSHCP) compliance.
The applicant has provided additional biology and MSHCP information, which was included in
,
the revised Initial Study. T~e South Coast Air Quality Management District requested that an Air
Quality Analysis be prepared, specifically the URBEMIS model due to concerns over traffic
fumes. The applicant has' completed an Air Quality Analysis, which is included in the Initial
Study. The revised Initial Study was distributed for public review on June 18, 2005 through July
18, 2005. As of the time this memo was prepared, there have been no public comments
regarding the Initial Study. · .
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Buttertield Ranch Shopping Center\MEMO to pc. doc
Environmental Determination:
An Initial Study has been prepared and indicates that the project will not have a potential for
significant environmental impacts. Based on the attached Initial Study, staff recommends
adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project.
Conclusion/Recommendation:
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Plan (PA 04-0621), based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval.
Attachments:
1. Staff Report from the May 18, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing
R:\D P\2004\04.0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\MEMO to PC.doc
.
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 118, 2005
Prepared by: Christine Damko
Title: Assistant Planner
File Number PA04-0621
Application Type: Development Plan
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
Planning Application No. PA04-0621 is a request for a Development Plan
to construct a new commercial shopping center located at the southeast
corner of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. The 20.33
acre site will consist of two phases and an open space preserve. The
applicant proposes to construct a 55,685 square foot shopping center,
with "Pad G" remaining vacant for a future restaurant use. The shopping
center will occupy approximately seven acres. Another five acres will be
designated as future commercial use and will developed at a later date
under a separate Development Plan. The remaining eight acres, which
includes the creek, will be preseryed as open space (Assessor's Parcel
Number 952-200-002,011,012, and 013).
[8] Approve with Conditions
D Deny
D Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
D Categorically Exempt
(Class)
D, Notice of Determination
(Section)
[8]' Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Celller\ST AFF REPORT-doc
I ]
I
I
I
I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Vandana Kelkar, MCA Architects
Completion Date:
December 20, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
May 18, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Community Commercial (CC)
Zoning Designation:
Community Commercial (CC)
SitelSurrounding Land Use:
Site: Vacant
North:
South:
East
Community Commercial (existing commercial)
Medium Density Residential(existing single family residences)
. Very Low Density Residential (existing/under construction single family
residences)
Highway Tourist Commercial (existing shopping center)
West:
Lot Area:
20.33 acres
Total Floor ArealRatio
19.64%
.
Landscape ArealCoverage 56,645 square feet! 20% of proposed shopping center area
Parking RequiredlProvided 232spaces I 282 spaces provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[g] 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
An application for a Development Plan was submitted on December 20, 2004. A DRC meeting
was held on January 27, 2005 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture and other departmental
issues. The applicant submitted revised plans on March 2, 2005.
The site was originally zoned, Neighborhood Commercial (NC), however with the General Plan
consistency zoning update in process, the zoning would change to Community Commercial
(CC), The project has been developed to Community Commercial zoning regulations.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Community Commercial (CC) zoning .
district. The 19.64 percent Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 30 percent for this
R:\D P\2004\04-062 J Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\ST AFF REPORT.doc
2
.
zoning district. The applicant has recently applied for a Parcel Map application to subdivide the
20 acre parcel into 7 legal lots. The map will create a separate lot for the buildings as well as
create a separate open space lot for the creek. The map is scheduled for Director's Hearing on
May 19, 2005. The applicant also plans to submit an application for Phase" of the commercial
development at a later date. Phase II is not part of this application. It will be a separate
Development Plan that will require Planning Commission approval.
Architecture
The proposed development is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines.
The proposed architectural style continues the "ranch theme" which exists along this stretch of
Highway 79 South. The pr9ject also proposes numerous architectural elements that will create
an architecturally pleasing and pedestrian friendly shopping center. These architectural elements
include: white, split rail fencing along Butterfield Stage Road and Highway 79; covered trellises
with a stone veneer base over pedestrian walkways throughout the site, including the parking lot;
and a common area located on the north west portion of the site, which includes a large circular
bench that will be covered with an overhead trellis with a stone veneer base, The common area
also includes a water feature that is consistent with the ranch architectural theme. The proposed
shopping center will also have decorative lighting to reflect the ranch theme throughout the site.
.
The buildings will be constructed of stucco with stone veneer accenting the main and side entry
ways of the building, Faux 'wood siding is strategically placed on some of the building facades.
along with colored tile accents that are used for added detail along the front, side, and rear
elevations. Along with the stone, faux wood siding, and tile accents the buildings also provide
varying pop-outs. The pop-outs range from 18 inches to 24 inches for the side elevations and up
to seven feet for the front and corner elevations. The proposed buildings also provide the look of
two story elements by placing glass windows on the top portion of some of the buildings. The
roof tiles pull the building architecture together by providing a faux wood shingle tile.
I
I
Landscapina
.
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Nine species of trees and seven species of shrubs are proposed for this site.
Tree species include Bottle Tree, Queen Palm, Date Palm, London Plane Tree, Torrey Pine,
Fern Pine, Purple Leaf Plum, Coast Live Oak, and Pink Flowering Locust. The streetscape
along Highway 79 South is proposed to contain Purple Leaf Plum in 24" and 36" boxes which will
accent the frontage views. Butterfield Stage Road will contain 15 gallon London Plane Trees and
24" box Fern Pines. The perimeter of the site will be fully landscaped and the parking area
landscaping meets Development Code requirements.
I
Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and soften
building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 56,725 square feet or 20 percent of the
site, which meets the minimum 20 percent landscape requirements in the CC (Community
Commercial) zone. i
Access, Circulation and Parkina
I
The Department of Public Works has analyzed the proposed traffic impact of the project and the
traffic report prepared for t~is project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with
the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City General Plan EIR and
draft General Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that
R:\D P\2004\04-062I Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\STAFF REPORT.doc
I )
i
!
there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Access to the
proposed shopping center will be provided by three access points, The first access point .
measures 38 feet wide and is located on the north side of the property off of Highway 79 South.
The second and third access points are located on the west side of the property off of Butterfield
Stage Road, The second access point measures 34 feet. wide while the third access point
measures 38 feet wide. The proposed project provides 282 parking spaces, while the parking
requirement for this size of use is 232. Two loading spaces have been provided along the south
east portion of the shopping center, behind the two largest building pads, Pads Band C, thereby
meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the Development Code.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
[8] 1. An Initial Study has been prepared and indicates that the project will not have a
potential for significant environmental impacts. Based on the attached Initial Study, staff
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Plan PA04-0621, based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F)
.
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City,
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and' policies reflected for
Community Commercial (eC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, professional office and
service oriented business activities, as typical uses in the Community Commercial
designation.' The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed
buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial buildings have
been designed to be compatible with the surrounding buildings currently located adjacent
to the subject site. In addition, the proposal is consistent with the development
regulations of the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district,
2, The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the.public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Commercial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation. architectural design and site plan design.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent .
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
R:\D P\2004\04-062! Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\ST AFf REPORT-doc
4
.
.
.
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1, Public Notice Map - Blue Page 6
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7
3. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 8
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
4 Initial Study - Blue Page 9
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch SrlOpping Ccntcr\STAFF REPORT.doc
5
-
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
.
VICINITY MAP
.
,
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Buttetiield Ranch Shopping Cenler\ST AFF REPORTdoc
6
. 1IA"<':\' ? I I P
200. " <A' ,. ,C\ ' :1\04-06211
II=- :e Iffi; rNW\:-'I~~~-I/~
1Iill 1\ r.-'i~y~ ,.-( Y~iii r.V y I
'(:: l.illlLL f-\\ ...,.. ",'\' j.X\ ~---(
h "Q iWfttffi ':\ y u..c \ W' -n)-1'&
Iffi~~'l -1;/ '\2\ \ .~~'
~ ~I .\\~\:.~
>>.. m\\1l127'. ir :u J:: ~
(fT! rrK wi,(X; 16! ~/
c.z wm fu \\- (j>
tC1"'~ t;2J.T1': j)- ~.
C-.l ,.~ 111 f\ . .'
~, "'~ '.. / . j ~ ~~
(j)9, S<'1' ---- f\\\ i'
~~. V ''''' ' ~~ >" .'
'. :>a:J;.:. I ------- ,." '\II ~.\'. ~
'~ \. ' ,>: c. --c-:;~~" , ,,,
,,,,"\ . ';:l ^~",., y ,. "" li!
\::l \ . -..~."\G"~. '\ ff~~C(/' =Kt '~_c \\ ~,%
~' ./Y;'. a.. c \-C \ ~ i'd" l'!#iIZ; u ,,,fifE>"" ,70
. ~=J"".V\~'\V'\: .\.-
III'.
,c,'if ,I.<\\-(<II ~ ~
~ Slj. ,,~" ~I='> ;;; "'~~
'fS~~ ,M ~\'IT "wi;;: "" '''~;,~~!''~
~<i&, .~~ ~ ~,,:;'" ~^ y~.
~O:I YO'" ~ He ::Jl ~'" ~ ",",,, ~ tY
Ilir.;,.~ ~R".~ ."~~. ~ I~ ~~~tl~
~ ~~~;/ ~. ~ ~/;:-7! '1rif:.
Il ~ ~'00 :'J' <<\\~_' ~;/ "
- eV\ '\11' . . 'Y',,~~', ~ ~~/~'~~
. (\\ \ \ !;W;fjJ'!:Y /1:. M 0" h
',..'~ ..~~;l,
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:\D P\2004\04-062] (Jutlerfield Ranch Shopping Center\STAFF REPORT-doc
7
.
'I
"" /...-"\
,: / i ( .I 0i 'J
-ll II; \. ~ ) / /
. ~ U ~
'-"~""~~"'""~ \. /
,~~ '. . "",,~_"_~~=.Z~~~~~~fi/'
1UJ."If,~-----
% ~ ~
I 1 II ;
I U!l !1lI bil;' II!!
1111. !!., !i!j; !~l'
l HI ! Ili !oil !Iii
I ' !
~ ~ ~
i i ~
/ ! !
! I' i'l
II!!!! I liml II!'!! I
! i lill!~ !i.,!. i I WI' ,
! i ;!lm ,!Jiil i "II! ,
I! I
/ , ,
jl ~: . 1 .r,;
11!I!l Ij!!!l 11!ll1
i IIdlll il!lill;!lm
ill
lUiii
ii@
!! . iH!!!
'. ~"'''i
~. iliIliJ~l.'lll..
.;. '., ';;mi
~.~ ;~ : ~~:t~5~~
"l"l!. /,z'u'
n' ~!!allll ~~~~~~~
, .- "'"
, .'
, i'!;
~ ~'l~~:;t~
a ~~I1J>i"~
II ~ Iii ;INl~l!
Ilhll'lllil'!!!!
!ll!, III I-I!
Wl!l,l m~i~!
-~-.u.>..>~<
~- \,
(.~~ "
I
r-
I' !
~
~
~ M
i
......,...
(r
. ;11
'I'
iiP" .
J-lrll :.
-,11)/ ,
~Irl(
w: I
Z,11
o ~ ;\
N < .1
~ "
w 1'1 .
'" illl ..' .
-', "/'" .
-- ' " ' ....' .
>:. :.1/..../..' /
Ii' iii
Ifli:...
'~'('" .
1,/.( ,
\i."(i,,_'-"
'IL!' .'
r/
~I.'.'.!':"
, ,.
1
r .',
/,
J
Ii'..
.
!l II II!
;'!illi
l
'!
."
II -I
!l !!
~ ~f~ ~ ~
i .!~ ' I
! II'I! .
! ~~a f ,
.I!l., il
! ili!! I
ii", 11
llli..j
:: ~i i'l
ml.,11
ii'jill!!
II " ,~.
ui~~ ~U
I ~ ...
'I &, "'
, I' &
I Ii I 'I
I,Ll ~ :~, i
o ~ t I" "rn
. O!!>-,' U ,-,," ,..
:~!' ,.. ..
1 ..,
I .~ III hi ! II
~! i! !!: sid: I
- ...18' FI '"F7 ,,':
~~
~,,'
rt
Ill,
'"
ij'
..~. 'U~_'
""'-"'U2i!
,;-.:T.i,,~:--- -- - - -~-~=--
1 II! II }
i !'I ,1 i
. 'I' ",1 "
i 'I .'1'
1I Iii iill! I
!; Iii 'I ;
h !I! II! I
f 11 llJ :;1 I
I i' !/; '!li '
:! ',! !il Ill! !
I I 9!, ,~l II
! :1 !~! ll'~ i,
I '! !I! Lh II
' I ,.,
d~ ~~ Q
I l' "" ! . I:'
i J'll li!!I' L"" ,!
; ! 'I:; I!!!!!! j,
I j'~! 1'1' 'I'll' "j
.IllIg I tUI
~
"
I II/
\ u..
\ -"'~-.....
\ -....
'''-
\'.,---_.._~
I \ i: ......::;;==
, .., .
~ 1- ,,-
\\\/,/
11
%
~.
'J" .
, , \"
. I 1;
.... T'\'\ ~
i \ .......,.--:
, './,-!f!__
~1 ! \ V j
..' i ,\ Ii
. I " "
\ I 'R '1
, I' o'u' \\
i I ow
1\ ,\ \',oz
\ ' ~ "'il '72
\ \ 'i, \\o.;u
\ \ , .UtIll-
\ ' \ ~. J:
\ ~=) ....
\ 0
~-"'-""-.
-~---~~,
-'~ -
--~
l:il:".lII'IR~--
. ..... .... el,
, ,
~q
;QJI
Uti!ll
e!i1~
~~:I!
"'
~r
-"
Ii!
,
all
;l~
1
g
~,
o
~
. .
.
o
6
>
IX
L.LJ
I-
Z
L.LJ
U
LJ
Z
0-
0-
o
I
Vl
I
U
Z
~
o
-l
L.LJ
u...
IX
'L.LJ
~
::::>
a:l
-
!il
'"
~
"
~
~
Cl:l
L
IT-
~
~\ Ln
~ ""
" ill
to:
" ~
.. .,......
~
'V;
'~
,
I
.,
~~
,!
"
"
i~
!!
a
!i
~;
"
t~
~~
j~
"
;~
H
;:1
!
"e
~~5
".".
~.'.
~~-
;og~
i~~~
~;~~
~ 6:::::
a:: E~ CI ~
r"'_%l""'iI9'l-'I'('~')"""""."'''''''''I@
~ 'C~< ......... ~"'O ..,.w'''' <<...
:)NINN'o'ld S311111:J.VJ N0I1.V3ID3!;
LIOlI a.ua~'1 C'U;Oj'IC:J
3~I11J31IHJH'>' 3dVJSQN">'l
dnO!JD V88Y'fVHlV
cici'
>>
_wm'lHOC>..."".......(I;Ill'<YoI~OPslIW_V":I~
OOlIUlY~~
",
, II,
! 1"'1' 1\;
'1'1'
. I
!'!l!l ; ~ !
Ii! } ~ 00 "1_ t:t:ttt
II'" I - " SlSlSl8$f
Hlll!. ~ 8 ~ ~ ~
lh. III :l ..- i ~ ~.
Mil! ~ ;""' ~ ;:s ~
~ ~ '" ~ ' ,
il~q'i! Ii ~ I! ~ ;:s I i
! ;(h~ >1~>1 ilj'
, ~.. ...~. ::~~~ ll~q
, ~ ~ i ~ ~
I ~
,
,
BlJTTEAAELD sTACE
::>f',I 'N3SN38S3 'd ~\fn <l:EtlMO
H~NVl:I 0138}j3l.ln8 '.L~
"
, 0-
8..J ~~
r ~ 0
~ 0 ~
<>
. u
.g-5
.
, mil ~
.
.
" , ~
! , . ,
! , I
" .
! t ~ ~ ~ ! , ,
~ ~i p"< I
'_ -,,,!I - -i " i
::~~~:::::::::: l!!m! ~ ,
~ ~ ; ~ a a a a I. ,
" g ~
! l;i"llll .............. ~ ~
I I !! II! ~~~~~~~ ,
0 0
~~::!..~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ,. ~ .
,
I , ,
~;i~~~~~5 , j
, ,,"," " I
~::-:~;:~~~~ -.,.,-...... ""
, 1
~ :.- ~ 'i ~ II l I
! I" ,
I " i
IlJl!,ld ~ ,<" ~ ~ '1 ,I I ,
i 1~;!iq!: '! 1'" ,
li: 0 ~ '3 ~ ~ '" H~ii,1 ~ ~ 8
,
, I
I , . <
j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ji
I I . .,ll ~ i
.. !:
i ;:I" ~;:I.. ~ ! iii1.i.';:I:I ,
I 'i 1111'" I. II!! " I i
g~~~:t~~~1 "'1'1" i! !.I
, ! ,I'!;!. pi Ll .. ii'-
, ~ ~ ~ ~.. %..;!; llll!!l 'I
i g 'f.:'! i ii! ~" 1 ~ 0 '
'" u.."-"- "- <> ~
! q ',,:';'..; . !,
f~~:~~~~:~:~ ~('->y r~ i"'~
H l~~~!~~~,ih ~~i;iii~~~~~
1 O~EEOO . 0 0 0 H IS 0
0000 @ , e
~
!
~
,
,
~Il:
. I
~'.'i
,!Ii
.
!
.
.
I
.
I
I
I
.
.
I
,
.
I
I
I
I
,
i
I
I
I
I
I
.
!
,
.
I
.
I
i
I
I
.
I
i
!
I
I
z.
jl
ll...
CJ'
zl
-,
~.
<1:'
-ll
ll..i
>-1
a:,
<(,
Zi
::2'
-l!
wi
lEI
I
I
i
,
.
.
I
i
I
I
I
.
I
.
.
I
, II
II ~ ~ ~
h t . ~ i ~ I
~ I I'll i'-l', - 'I
i g _ li~ hd ! ~ q. 'i ~ ~ ! II ~
'1,11lj!1"'!I"d d pi, I!" ,..'
~ ~jH~~HHH. ~h~ li::~~ i lfl ~& II
" .,""'H11\1l""H\,,"
h~~~~~UguH~dH"~ T1 I t
.
.
ffi
f-.:
~
llJ~~
o <::(~
1 ,,,-l~
o:vQ..:t
~ 2: ~
5 - (j ~~
· CLCL .., ,I
~ ~...~
" 0 is a~
~:r:-<:(c,
; C/) 0:: "
- ,.
~:r:'"''
o v,.."
~ 0 -l ':
~ ~ ~ ~~
" -<:( :::::>..
~ 0:: I- '!
· CL '"
· QllJE;
S -l O'!
~ UJ .., g.
~<"'<Lt
, u.: 0 ,~
0:: 0 ,:
!.J.J "
I:: l'
::;!
~~
::> "
en
,I!
" .
~
" 'I \\ I,
I
;
li.i ~
~ ~~ I~ I~:
(i I~ hi
'j ii,','!,
!~+ ~Ii ~ Ii
Iii !illi'I,I'
n ~:~ f
~ ~ ~
.
.
i g ~
. ", I , ,_
~~ii~~l! ~:~
!~!;! ili I!" 1m I!,!;
I"l-""''''
1< 'I'l'!'"''''
hd ~d ~ il il~I~M~
. i
" .
, l1j
~ <l e: ~
'" t t i~
; lip ~I
i . ~~
" I II
~
. ',; ~
~ ~ ~
.<
, !
.
.
..
I,
'!
:1'\/
/ 'I l
~iS ~~
"
"
"
!
;1
; ~ ~ i~ ~
~; ~I___~~~~
:i.ld,r,'l'l'i!i; ,I!
! i ~ ~ ~ I 8 - ,.~
; ; ~ ,~ :isie i ~ ~
Il",;!""'1 "
~~~f~~<i . iij
~ f ~ ~ .. l~ ~, I .'
hH1iL :d
Ii
r~F~!
<I""
I H.K
IIlhi
" I II
Q 'I i
d ! ~ ~
.
~
'--!
il !."
~ \oJ",;
.,
!!
,
:~':
"
"
~
"
,
"
,
-
I ~I
~~
"
,
~~ i~i~i
it :Pb
':'! 'j!:;
i~~ . ~U~
'i' !I",-
~.~ u
"1~ .,',11"
~:~ ~;
'.'.', :~.pl
~.".R
Vt~ ~~~~i'
dt "u.
~;~ :.a~~~~
m ~W~~
~~. hi~U
~U ~~Ua~
-
~! ~
.
::
o
,
o.
~
,
~:
-,
~~
.
,I
,
U
f-
W
W
I
If)
0::
UJ
I-
z
UJ
U
lJ
Z
c...
c...c
og
I~
Vl:
I"
U~
Z~
<(~
o:::~
o
....J
UJ
u...
0::
UJ
~
:J
ca
~!
0 -,
,. ~L
" , I ' ..
0 ~<l i ;~f~g
~ .j. . , ~~ ,
, ~ ~ ~ I :r.:i!.,:;t
~n I"~ ~in s.,</-
" -" '!;~
~ ~~; ~~' ~~~g 'oi'
m -!-' F~~ h~e
0 LI~ _.h
!
U"'I
t=~~;
sr6:;1
~....;:. i
r~.ii
~;::~j
,I~m
!-...~~:
}!;<i~
l!~'!'
!~- ,
.; ~-
~ '" z 0
,~<"'
~~:sl ~!~
"~..
8~
,1
N
U
r-
w
w
I
lI1
.
/
,
ej
~ ~I
~'Il
"
.
oc
LW
I-
z
LW
U
LJ
Z
a:
c..o
O~
:::c ~"
Vl-"
.-
:::c "'<
U~1
Z ~8
<( ~~
~~
.
<
.
.
':'
.
"
.
H
e
"
u
"
,
~
, ~
~ ~
, "
, -
,-
I.il!
~! .Ui.! ! d
-I" .iL . . '"1
~ 111:'11 ! - i :: li,
5.!ll!-l II! II "IIi
- ! . " I .! I I I
~'j'll!.! I ,,' I II! i ~ i I Ii,
~ ! . ,IiI! I " _ ; ~ i II i i! !! I! j, 1- · ~ ! ! '
g i Iii!!! 1111 i Ill! Il!i ii il il! i Ii!
""9 E""'''''6'''''-'~'' b II ~ ; llll
_ _ '8 1::1 'fffi ~ @g@I.;t
"
o
,
.
o
~
,
~
a
I
"
i
.
~
g
.
.
3
~
."
,,;
;'
'":>
'5
.s
! I
1'1
~
"
~
.
o
~
i
a
~
"
,
~
!
i
E
i:
a
.
,
.
1'o::l"~JI
. I l"'"
i. vG~~'
! ~~<l!a
0'1.
" Sl: ~Ii
,
'l.
: ~
: ~
e:::
UJ
f-
Z
UJ
U
lJ
ZQ
-<
c..~
c..~
O~
:r 9N
V'l ~~
:r ~~
U4~
Z~~
~f
z
O~
,.
~~
UJ
Ll-
e:::
UJ
f-
f-
:::J
c::l
.
g
~~-
I~~'
.~~!
.o~.
.~~~
~s.~
Vl
Z
o
I-
~
....l
UJ
o
UJ
L:l
cr:
:5
z
UJ
cr:
o
u..
l.O
~
u..
o
~
~
~
UJ
:J:
Vl
UJ
UJ
Vl
I
h
I' >
~\~
~
H
, l
I e
I ~
I;
: i
, ~
Vl
Z
o
I- \
:;; \
LJ.J \
....J
UJ
o
UJ
L:l
cr:
:5
z
UJ
cr:
o
u..
l.O
u..
o
n
i>
,
9
~
z
o
~
~
\, ~
\~
~
t;
UJ
:J:
Vl
UJ
UJ
Vl
"
!I
J
II
l~
i!
~ .
H
I ~
.
,
,
z
o
~
,
-
!
i
L.
I
I
d ~
, .
I "O"\iJI
- \.Jii!!
! .:;: 0'11
M "~~Il
,
.
~
i';
~
c:::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
LJ
Zo
-<
Q.."
a..~
O~
J: .~
V'l ~:c
~~
I: =:;;
U.o
'u
Z ~>
~i~
.
O~
...J.
UJ
i:i:
c:::
UJ
~
:::l
a:I
.
.
!
,,~
~~~
i~a~
'of
~M
.
.1
1 I
.
':
.
n
~I--
!'
I 111
'lll,i . '
'i!!! Hi
"Idl.' ,; .' Iii
~ I, li'll l i i : i"
~ i! "I' ! . . "I I!
~ 1! il!ll. ! ill' ! !' 1,1;
"11'1'1' " I' 'j , i' . ,
g . Jill! i, i' 1,1. i' II '. i ,,!! i
~H!,lIiitH,IHHII.~~ ~~11111
-' @H;";'@
<
~
z
Q
~
.
.
~
~
(
\
I
..
( I
.,
\;
.
':
~
o
,
~
I
III "i'di
~ _ r ~~~.l
.. Vd~
, ~JI!
.'lJ.
.
. .
. "
~
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
LJ
Zc
-<
Cl..~
Cl..-
O~
:J: ~:;1
V'l '.
I~~
U~~
Zfc~
<t: ~~
~ffi
z
Q~
...,J::t
UJ
u...
~
UJ
~
::::>
a:l
!
ug
.s-
~..e~;3
~6~'
5o~,
.~~~
~~"~
I.
l
,-.
<!";
-:.;
,
..~.
I
,
i
i
i
i
I
t
,
I
I
I
I
i ~i
cal 0'1
~I ~-i
91 u!
3' ~!
~I ~I
:
"
I 111
!. "
II ill'l
-I "I.,! -
,,_Ill,' ',;
!Pdl!1 Iii I i II! I
~,!1 mil ' :I!! !! II' I!.
.' ,., ,I . _ - I . - .' I !
~! . I'd! " i, i i i i jl I, I. Ii!' I' ;
8 i 1111l! illllllllli ,dill I! h n ! ! I !
E>e . _:' I 1 .ld'! .,ljIPH! !
e'~.'~eee(3@ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ j I ~
@ Cl e ~ ~
,~ @@~,~ d
~I
~i
;:;,
;;II
~I
0,
::'1
"
1-1
iii,
,>,
r'
~'
~r
~!
~,[~ ~'l'~.
~ vtil{
~~!i!
~ ~ ~~
.
o
o
:'1 ~
~ ~
. ~
ex:
L.l.J
I-
Z
L.l.J
U
LJ
Zo
-<
a...~
a...~
o~
I~'"
Vl ~~
J: 5~
u~~
z ~~
~~~
~
08
...J~
L.l.J
I..L.
ex:
L.l.J
1=
::J
a:l
.
Ii
lfil
~I
~I
.
,
i
~i
~~
t:
l'
ji
It
;~
li
,-
::
ii
"
r~
;v
!'
n
ti
!
u~
. -
z:~i
~~~~
.~v_
:~ii
~'l.~
.
.
)?~@~
.
1/1
i
~I
='1
;:!,
,..
~
I i ~
I ~
~,
~;Y
,;-
.,"
d.,
7\
\\
. /.\
'/>\ \
..';i~~~~r~:~~
", ~~,m
'0n'~'
-':lb '.1 nn
>'- ~~~~if:J,:
I,nnmjtnnl"
-~_m'i
rU __'m ___uuuu 0'"
-.
,-
"I
'~
i r ,I U
1
,
{ I
-!~I }
rI
, ,...--i->------.-I
' ,liiOOlj n
.~--~ ~
~
c
~
~
~
oj
~
,..
~
<
u
~
i
i
',I
"I
i
I
;""-1
':t'-j-[uh
:i ii
.
'-~B':i
[1'
I
,
II.
" I
1'1
Ji
1-
Ir)
i1:
,
i
,
!
"
Il
!l
Ii
'i
i
~ ~
1I ~
Ii
! ~
! I
11,1
111\
! ~;;:;:=-_:
i! i
, .
II
i:
:i
II
,~;:"e::;:,",'C1' I
"cO ,I ,
~;~;_. -~,.~- --.~J,,-,:!
'--"'~i,
~
>
~
d II
"
l!
I I
~ ~ I:
'.
~'!'
~<~l
"l'
I \"1'
V~a!
~~:!i
..
~I
~!
:::li
~I
~I
il
~!
.1
~I
~i
!
!
,
I ! !
tD1i~-{
lH
I c
I! :
Jil
; I i
~! !
f
I:
~ 'M'
o ;e
,
L.,;'
~
>
\; ;]1
~ ~
;1
!;;i
01
~I
~I
~-~=-~
!J! I: I
~4----.~-, ,,}~:
~
>
"
z
~
c:::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
LJ
Zo
-<
c..g
c..~
O~
I~
Vlffi
I~
U~
Z~
~;
O~
...J~
UJ
L.L
c:::
UJ
~
=>
to
:"
~
N
t;;
~
iJi
~
~
o
~
,..
;;;
!
oe
~d:i
~;:;~S
!:~~;:
:~8i
~~~~
I~ "'f~.!i
, U~W
, :s:f<lo'u
."J!:
,
~
-1
~ ~
"
.. ~
, ~
r-.:i)
"
(~).
~
I.LJ
~
Z
I.LJ
U
LJ
ZQ
-<
a..~
a..~
of1
Q
I ~~
V')::.::::
I 5~
U~~
u
ZH
~ i~
Q~
-J~
I.LJ
u..
~
I.LJ
~
::l
a:l
------. I
======rl=p,)
;: I n
~
~
o
m
tu
w
:x:
~
"
o
;:;
,
z
:5
~
'"
o
o
ii
!
o~
.. .
~~~
T~
~~gi
!.~ -
~"~.
.
g
~
:;
.
.
g
~
.
.
.
.
I
I
I :
, :
I
I
.
-
(8')
T
,
I
I
!
j
I'
--.-.j .~-- ---
.
.f.....
~:
.N-'
t?'
(.;.)'
~
I
--
('"
T'
, ,,~" --
-.~~'
~~.~
(i;il
T
.~
.b,
:'=1~i-
,
i.....
i-
!
~..
I I I
I i I
I~ I .. I'
1--1 -1-"--
I, Y ,I I
U~::::.g
! I~!~ I I
-J- _I- i
-I'-i--
I I
I i
I I
I
1
j I
J !
B . I
, I: '
Ibdd' ,I
1 ' !
:~:::'r ":::,..:.c=:,.... ,_J
Jln,""; I
, I ,
i,~ I
:1. .1
, I
I I
f I
I :
I j! I
w--: _ [.
Ii [I r~ : ^ =rl-'--- --'1 ---- .--
..p~...QJ1 '
! ~ d ..-~, -,Iii
I'll ; .jl,/'
i ! C::,+ r,:1 I,
J.-Lt::{~,:::;~:.r~ /:!
I . -..r
i ,I~ ~'i
.,.,dlJ:
t~:~~J_'~__ i
."-'""ZF"'-'" .._-~ .. ..-.....
':;--.;r::--
~.~".
........
!
,N,
W
N'
u'
-Tl~=
~t-
~+--i
:1 ..
J,---- ~
Ii :
,,'I t
'i ~
.. ""Ii '
,..::::ft:::T---l--
~~ .J i .I
'I '
, ,
,]1 ,
~.:<:" pi I
n-::!',
..
I~.'
I~~!'
'.' Ul:"i!
I "I.
.1'
, ~~'il
~ ~ to
~
.0
:{~
.~~
'~)
c:::
LLl
I-
z
LLl
U
LJ
Z~
Q.,.
Q.,-
O~
:c ~~
V') 15;
:r: 5~
U::5"
Z ~~
~~~
.
08
....J:!
LLl
L.L
c:::
LLl
~
:::l
!Xl
;IOJ
-'
<:)
z
:l
~
'"
o
9
~
!,
I.
..
il
.1
,.
II
l'
,I
"
If
..
.1
'I
"
!:
il
,.
,;
.
j
. ..
",:ilji
:I;!~3
=i3~~
'";"
.~ili
:.F
~;;~~
-
~, f- f
......~
" .-
--
r ,
I ,
'.(1
~~ .~
I <1':.
i
I.
1m; !
, .
"
i'
j'i
,
j
II 0{'1!
.1 ~~!u
!i ,,~:;
:{i
.~~
9o::t;;8 II
15g'= ~;
iJi~; ,. '"
,
I
ir,]~
IIJJ:}
I
I'
0:::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
U
z~
a...~
a...~
o~
:I: 9....
Vl ~~
I ~;
u~~
z.i
~~~
z
"Q S
.....J::!
UJ
u::
0:::
UJ
,~
c:l
'"
o
~
.
~~
.~-
.~~~
~.i~'
.~ <
~. .
iHH~~
.
.
1
r
"
:i
L
"
"
II
!i
r~
I'
-,
r,
H
"
t=
1_,
.'
'I'
L
"
.
.
.
.
,I
!ol~~l:l
o~o~
~~~~
'aJ"
Iwi
I
I
,,'"
"
,
I "
" ',I
{I"
1 r
I!"
I~}>='l j!1 ~-'~l.
I I!I i ,.,
I ~ ' '
II!I
. , I .'~'
(,0:.'~,
II I
~I ,I ,I
. ' ,
, ,
I' J ;! '
,;'; I I"'f
1'1:1 ;,,,
!t---------~
I' ! ~i :
,_ I.' '
(+~, II i :__.J
-' '<,' rrpC-i ~
II i ~'!': !
II i i!1 :::
,..I ,':
i.J! : ~ ;
I': ';--0"
I I"" ---
! ,I t-~- , ,-
11!.1 : : '
, I It,
i L():<-------::- _LL-i. I l
,I :lFlIO' I
ol.-~..U---t. I -----
";.-!-. iul L+ .JL.11,
""'-1 ,~ 'r
,. "':f~T-:~"'~~~'_::-~-~~~.,r==-_~
!o]
~~ ~
I:';:;
w.:',
.,
.....
121,' ~
'0
- "'
III""
"'" "
.,
:~~J
, -
,
,''''''"
! ,
,
,
"
1m Ie,
11':'1"
.~"
i ?;
i
-r-,----J.
:' I
: 1
,
,
,
.moo(-
I
,
...)
i
-t
~,
~~!"
U~'UI
~~"..
Ii'!.
~ ~'j;
o
o
"
:0[
.
%
"
:~~
. -
. &
c:::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
LJ
Zc
-~
0..1>
o..~
O~
:c ~~
Vl Iii"
:r: ~~
U4~
~,
Z~~
~~~
~
08
....J::i
UJ
L.L..
c:::
UJ
~
~
a:l
'"
o
g
.
!
,:
..
~I
Ii
,.
II
!l
~!
i!
,
fi
,.
,;;
l~~
::
.~
"
~~
.
ui
. .
.~-
~~ia
:~;j~
~~~i
~ilE
h~~
~,
T
I
I
1
(;;;) IL
hJ~V,!fQ:
I 'f-t- I~I
~ : i I" ,I I I 1 , 0
..J " !iF
.",",'"
-, -----n-Tr.::
(UlrlTI . ':
- II:
~
!i: - 'il,']
(~~p""..'I,..
Ilt~..,
~ 'I"
I
I
- I t~.
\""'"+ _It-."" I
~'I 1'1 I
~ILi
"I I
11 I
i I
- I i 11 ,
.- ~-...~.
,~ II
I r I
1~'Hlh
III' ,.', j II
), I -"
,;:;,+' Ll""" " 'J
'...' I: i 1
I~'I"
I I
t'l :
I U__ "'" _
1._;----..1._ ::
I '~O ;.'
- "'
I ':;
I *'
'~~ ~
I ,.,
LL :'1
I
q-.I r
;"-:~I ' W" ",
oii~:: _ ':::, .::'
ili.'c I ''!
- lL --'-
! '
[1]' ;
'I ~~
L.. '~
I
,
i, m. ~
I;, '"
10
I _LL "-:'
I
c..i.: I-
I i I
WI,
, '
.,.."-
I ;Q-JI
~ .~ ~
~o U~d'
! ~~'!l
II, ,,~:,~
"
~
,
II .
rI'l
II I
III
I :: ~ ~
.a-.'T"" .
0:::
L.l..I
I-
Z
L.l..I
U
lJ
Zc
- <
c..~
c.. ~ '
O~
J: iii~
Vl ~~
I ~~
.~
U~o
'u
Z ia
~r
Cl~
....J~
L.l..I
u..
0:::
L.l..I
~
::l
r:Q
"
,. ,
,
i (
I 1 ,
I L "
rl", I ),
-~tlULr<1'-
,III ..I
---.!1..lll
=ii~
-.~ jEp];..JJ
=4I1IJ
,:,1 ! ! : ~1
;(1 i I ~.__I
.. ct., - if=;j:'p or,'
... ... -triJ! i .,
.. " IT
-J i
- -:c::,,-<"
~
.
.~
~:;-
...
i\S-c;:::
!~c:l:f
,of
~M
~.~~
.
.
~
t
~f
Ii
1'-
11
'I
"
if
-,
h
f~
!:
"
.!;
~f
li:
.
.
\~;~
.
(~;>--
.
T
I
I
I
----""'.-.._---------
tj ~
ii ~I:mnm
" '
" '
" :
" '
" '
" '
" '
:' I
Ii I'
': ~
i: 'ij:
: I;:
:: ~:
:: :
:: ':
I,~I'
" '
~'~ L:m
jj~ -t---
:'
!
l-.::rli!i
U"\~h
- ~~!!,
,j ~I.
" ..
., ,
(;;"
'(
I
:{~
.~~
c::
L.i.J
~
Z
L.i.J
U
L:l
z~
c..~
c..-
o~
:c ~~
V1 i;
I~s
U~a
z~~
~f
~
08
. -
~~
L.i.J
u..
c::
L.i.J
~
:::l
!XI
______l___
DI mn
-------t----
~ I !
,~
,
~i
,
,
,
,
,
,
*:
$ t
- ~
r~~'l
Iii',. I
1L,d1
IQI
I' 'I
L~,=---~
,
"
: '~
' -
: i ~i
I ~ ~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
;;
,~'
:j
:<
c
!f:
,
z
5
~
g
'"
.
u~
. '
~-
H~
i~~~=
". .
"' i
~a ,
~=~t:!
~ :ITJ "
~ I ~
''': ~ ""
: I
I
I ~
I 1
1/
I
I
I
!
; I
I I
I ~,
I ~I
I /C
I'
I
I
I
I
I
~ i
11<1
",l'J
~
1.,1 ,m
~: .~
I ~I
: I
i J
I'"
I
i j I
I'
iJ I
I'
I
I
: ~
';J :mn
t;;'. _.
I
j
:1
~
j
:1
;j
j
;)
1"1
~"
~l!'
~~:!!
.
.
-,
oOJ
~
f
r.l,
[oJ,
r.l,
([oJ:
, ,
/ ,
/, I
! I i__
;
?
,
I -"'-=-~:'f"-;~;-;--~~-;--=-=-=-;-;-=-=-=-~':'~:: II
':" ::l~
]1:: ":'
:::: . 21 I:::
,III 'I III!
1111 7 "II
,III ~ I1II
:i:: .. 'l:~
,ill ",1
IliI ",I
1111 ",I
1111 ",I
I'll 11,1
,I,! ",'
"II 11,1
I::: :::Fi1
1111 "1111
ko-~~:-o_""'y'-'-'-'-"-'-'-';'~'-~ '
.<>-,~, II
"
II
II
"
'I
iI
"
~,
,..
; ~
0::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
lJ
Z~
a..~
a..-
O~
IdN
Vl5S
I ~~
U:~
'0
Z~~
~ i~
C~
-1~
UJ
u..
0::
UJ
~
:::>
co
,
~
'i
.
.J
~i
, ~
....,.. I
m:
,
rn:
. ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
....
'1
~
,'"I
~ II
!111
. il
"
II
,
Ljnn"=j=Je,n
;: --~,:> '., II:::
I: ~1 ~'II " ,
1- 'i'I " " I
:' ,;: f, :~ ~
: II::
: ."..,.1"::
: , II::
: t" ..Ii::
. I:,
II ::
II ::
II ::
"
, ,
. "
~
o
M
LJ
!
j
11--
1.1
I
~ 'I
Iii
'1 I
J
. ~
,j
"
:~j
;1
,I
~
~
J
,
'~"1'_= '0"." =
.
~1
:~1
!
o~
.~.
~..~
.~~-
"f
~!~i
3,..
.
(~) (-;;; (f
r ~
~T".'
t ~
.
... csL r -"l :
I ~':Q:~ !
I - I 'I:
, "
~ II ~ r !j ,i ....
"lOil JfilJi
II I I,' ., ~ Ii
~ I : I,~ liJ 11
I I r-.):
I I. I,
, I I,' ,I'
I 'I:
I' : : ~I :
I ~ II :i ',:,l ~
I 10 il}li!
I I' :
I.' 11'1 i"~ :'1' I r .00 ','I
- I ':'1 : ",. 'I
1 '-..lJ.-,,!' I: j II
1I,-r-.I~-":-
'. --------c:::JJ i '
,L__..__' 11_ :
. - - - - ---~ "-f - -- '
Ii
"II
~ f"
.:1
I_~ _~
....
Ii
(, p
-...:,JJ,
~/ ~
~ L ~...::
" ~ ' I'
~ "
; J:
"
~ ::
- ,
.' "
, "
"
..'l
'8,'
, .. ",j
, ~
, '
,
, '
, I J
: . ~I
I 1'1
.'_L...:....
r -.- ...,.
;
I
.
I'. -.::r~JI
r'l"'"
j- vG;;~
. ~~.h
. "I.
"
L I
~)
o
2
g
z
a
~~I
~)
0:::
l,LJ
f-
Z
I.J.J
U
LJ
Zc
-<
o..~
0..-
O~
I: ~fJ
Vl8~
I ~~
U:~
'u
ZH
~ ~~
~
C~
...J~
I.J.J
u..
0:::
I.J.J
~
::::>
CO
vOl
-'
>oj
I
,
~
IT~'
I
, I
ill
II ..
_.--......:~!
::;
:i1
!
~E
.~-
;,1.
3~~2
.~ii
~a '
3.. .
I" '<:l"~Ji
I '\"<1'
i vtU
'~ ~.~:;.
-I.
~;
,
! ,
I
I ~
fl ... j')--
I ~
EI
.~ I
.' .~
:I~
.. ~
. &
i=-~._._.
(~.l~-
tm~_;_
[ '!I ;,1 ; ,., ~fh~ I
: n/, " I ;
'_u::,~ !~I' I
I[~- .~ i -i - - It
ltj U I. I rnJi"
il :1: '
II :tR': I
~
II I :.,:. I
Illr~ *t~ ,--- --ft I ;
'_ f~ I I I
II I: I:. I I
I I~I I
~~ ~I i~_>.~ ,~' I
" # I~ I ' , ' I
. - "Ll-- -----'-1---'-- -- -- '.
_nu__J I I!, -.
I ;I~: I: ["
I... 1,;1 : ,I : I
:j I,A" I
__) ItlJ ;
;' _ .Lc=l~ ~ , j :
__I ~
, ~
I !I
1
II
II
II-
I
ex:
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
LJ
z~
Q.,~
Q.,-
O~
o
I "N
VlI~
I~~
U~J
zi~
~f
~
08
~~
UJ
L.L.
ex:
UJ
1=
:::l
CO
t
i..,">--_
:..':i----
(~..>---
, 1
I
I
I.
; I
J
iU)
'00'
(.,(l
.
.
'"
"
1<
,
z
:5
~
~
~ .
!
<J~
~~-
!~~~
~igi
~~~~
If I
:c,qJ...,.~ _
I. , 1
I." j
1'1.'/1
-'--1--;+'-+,-
Iril I~.' .,,', ('"
g ':'1,' .~1 .,,,
~ I~! _ .. ~ -: ,I
~ -:HJi '~;i if
I ~ I ~ _.1 :1, : :i
I I" ~',., ' "
. j - -",~I "
_ t.t-"I !:
:~/r--; ~' ;;
,I : ::
1 ,I .t' "
I I-!f ~ i: i.
i I "
',ij Ii ~ *'1
1.+--+'
"icg:-
I ,il
I~ I '
1',1 I .,j
1:1. j . ~ J
:d:J' l~: -
, ','
,'=Pij_n
~, ~
i.
"
.
I~
(~.}------
~:~
i,~)--.-
.
(~)----
~I
I,N}-
::1
:'1
~i
'=r-_i ,':11
:~
;1
.
I' ~II!
~~'il
. "
,
T
I
I ~.
-j
!! 5'
: f
0:::
UJ
I-
Z
UJ
U
lJ
Z~
c..~
c..~
Oi1
I ~~
Vl :i....
::r: ~~
U:~
z ~i
~ ,.
."
o
ffi
,
OS
....J~
UJ
u...
0:::
UJ
1=
::l
aJ
t!"
:1
i
:1
!,
,.
I!
!!
:,
'I
!.
I'
.!
"
'1
"
n
l!
"
~
o
o
~
!
~~
-:;Ii
~~".
..i3~:f
OOi"
". .
':j i
!~.~
.
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
.
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\STAFF REPORT.doc
8
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0621,
A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A NEW 55,685 SQUARE
FOOT SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.: 952-200-002,011, AND 013. THE 20.33
ACRE PROPERTY WILL BE BUILT IN TWO PHASES AND WILL
INCLUDE AN OPEN SPACE PRESERVE.
WHEREAS, Vandana Kelkar, representing MCA Architects, filed Planning Application
No. PA04-0621, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0621 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the' Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA04-0621 on July 20, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA04-0621 subject to the
conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA04-0621
conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. FindinQs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. 04-0200 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section
17.05.01 O,F of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
I
The proposal is cJnsistent with the land use designation and policies rellected for
Community Comm~rcial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
,
General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, prolessional office and
service oriented business activities, as typical uses in the Community Commercial
designation. The ~Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed
buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial buildings
have been designed to be compatible with the surrounding buildings currently located
adjacent to the subject site. In addition, the proposal is consistent with the development
regulations ofthe Community Commercial (CC) zoning district.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenlcr\Draft Reso revised #2.doc
I
B, The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare, .
The proposed project is consistljint with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code, The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Commercial Development Performance Standards 01 the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design,
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and lunction in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Adopt a Negative Declaration based on the
Initial Study for Planning Application Nos. PA04-0621, which was prepared pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15072.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No, PA04-0621 (Development Plan) to construct a
commercial shopping center consisting of 55,685 square feet of building space with conditions
of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20th day of July 2005.
.
David Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
R;\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield R::lnch Shopping Ccnter\Drafl Reso revised #2.doc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:\D P\2004\04-062I Bunerfield Ranch,Shopping Center\Draft Reso revised #2.doc
.,
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
.
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch:Shopping Center\Dr~fl Reso revised #2.doc
4
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA 04-0621 (Development Plan)
I
Project Description:
Planning Application PA 04-0621 is a request for a
Development Plan to construct a new 55,685 square foot
shopping center at the southeast corner of Highway 79 South
and Butterfield Stage Road. The 20.33 acre property will be
built in two phases and will include an open space preserve.
Assessor's Parcel No,
952-200-002,011,012, and 013
i
MSHCP Category:
Retail/Service
DIF Category:
Retail/Service
TUMF Category:
Retail/Service
Approval Date:
July 20, 2005
Expiration Date: i
July 20,2007
. WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
.
Planning Department
1, The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three
Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred
and Fifty Dollar ($1 ,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus
the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice
of Determination for the Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code
Section 211 08(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-
eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
A:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler\COA's revised.doc
1
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Buttertield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised. doc
2
.
. 5.
6,
7.
8.
9.
.
Planning Department
2, The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the vqters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action, The City reseryes the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3, The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this development plan.
4. This approval shall, be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction'
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
All downspouts sha'lI be internalized.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniq8es, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
condition of approv~1. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest ,may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision
to the Planning COf1)mission for its decision.
Material
Roof Tile
Stone Veneer
Exterior Cement Plaster
i
!
Color
Tile concrete Shake, color: Autumn Wood
Eldorado Stone, color: Castaway
Sherwin Williams: Ivoire, SW 6127; Blond, SW
6122:Restrained Gold, SW 6129; Camelback, SW
6122; Roycroft Suede, SW 2842, Roycroff Copper
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA'srevised.doc
3
Weatherboard Shingles
Red, SW 2839; Roycroft Bronze Green, SW 2846;
Cobble Brown, SW 6082
Sherwin Williams: Mannered Gold, SW 6130;
Renwick Olive, SW 2815
.
Accent Tile
Daltile and Sonterra Collection, colors: emerald, navy
blue, and terra cotta
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the- responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11, The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations, All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints,
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
Public Works
13.
A Grading Permit for either rough andlor precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right~of-way.
.
14. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
15. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars,
16. The vehicular movement for the driveway on Highway 79 South shall be restricted to a right
in/right out.
17. The vehicular movement for the northerly driveway on Butterfield Stage Road shall be
restricted to a right in/right out.
Fire Department
18. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
4
.
19.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1, The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2350 GPM with 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903,2, Appendix '"-A)
20. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1, A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads
and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available
from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be
required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
21. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903,2)
22, If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction, (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
. Community Services
23. The City of Temecula's Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan identifies an eight foot
wide (M-1) Class I trail along Butterfield Stage Road (Trail Section 9B) as well as along the
south side of Temecula Creek (Trail Section 3B) with a connection to a Riverside County
trail. '
24. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
25.
26,
27.
28.
.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris.: Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris,
i
The developer shall contact the Maintenance Superintendent for a pre-design meeting to
obtain TCSD design specifications for the landscaped median.
I
Construction of the future landscaped median on Butterfield Stage Road shall commence
pursuant to a pre1construction meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance
Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may
preclude acceptanc:e of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs.
,
I .
The developer, the developer's successor or assIgnee, shall be responsible for the
maintenance of the landscaped median until such time as those responsibilities are
accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party.
i
,
!
,
I
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
, i 5
I
,
29.
The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
30.
All parkways, landscaping, fencing, multi-use trail and on site lighting shall be maintained by
the property owner or maintenance association.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised,doc
6
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
I
.
.
R:\D P\2QQ4\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler\COA's revised.doc
7
.
.
.
Planning Department
31. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
32, The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
I
33. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
34.
The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of :'iuch determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
,
Public Works
35. A copy of the gradiflg, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic
calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
36. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for
work within their right-of-way.
37.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works, The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private propertY.
I
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control imprbvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works,
I
A Soil Report shall ~e prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The report
shall address all s'oils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
38.
39.
,
R:\D P\2Q04\04-0621 Buttertield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
8
40.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
.
41. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff, The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
42.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-construction
pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures
shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion
& Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control,
and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures
shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit.
Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural
onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with
stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain.
Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans
for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a
Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure
ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
.
43. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a.) San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b.) Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c,) Planning Department
d.) Department of Public Works
44. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
45. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
46. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works,
47. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
'include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. .
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
9
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
10
.
48.
49.
.
Planning Department
A comprehensive sign program application shall be filed with the Planning Department
before the issuance of a sign permit.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions, The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items: '
I
a.) Appropriat~ filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
I
b.) Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc, are not to infringe on this area,
c.) Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d.) Detail of outdoor employee eating area, This area shall include a trellis with
appropriate vines to shade the outdoor employee break area, decorative furniture
and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the
Planning Director.
e.) One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
f.) Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance),
g.) Total cost e'stimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
h.) A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property.' The approved
maintenanc~ program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
i.) The landscape plan shall be amended with the following conditions:
j,) Landscaping shall be installed in the parkway along Buttterfield Stage Road as
approved by the Director of Planning,
50. Future Pad G shall ,be temporarily landscaped to include plantings and irrigation as
approved by the Director of Planning,
51. Submit detail elevations of Pad G to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
I
52. A minimum of one broad canopy type tree shall be provided per 4 parking spaces. The
trees shall be in c1o~e proximity to the parking spaces they are to shade. Additional planting
area shall be provided as required to allow for these trees.
I
53. Plants in containersll along with site amenities shall be provided for areas adjacent to store
fronts along walkways as approved by the Director of Planning.
i
,
.
A:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler\COA's revised. doc
11
54.
All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire
check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group
utilities together in order to reduce intrusion, Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-
thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and
insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
55. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
56. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall
be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely
as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
57. Provide a detail of the proposed water feature located in the common area located between
Shops "E" and "F" to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
58. Tract Map 33545 shall be recorded prior to issuance of the first building permit.
Public Works
59. Prior to the first building permit, Tract Map No. 33545 shall be recorded.
60.
Improvement plans andlor precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works,
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a,) Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C, and 1.00% minimum over A.C,
paving.
b.) Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c.) Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803,
d,) Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402.
e.) All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f.) Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
g.) Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
61, The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted, Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a.)
Improve Highway 79 South from Butterfield Stage Road to the easterly property
boundary (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of
sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but
not limited to water and sewer), and a raised landscaped median.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Improve Butterfield Stage Road from Highway 79 South to the southerly property
boundary (Major Highway Standards - 100' RIW) to include installation of paving,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping,
utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a raised landscaped
median.
c.) The signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road shall
be modified to accommodate full movement.
b.)
62. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a,)
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic
signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
Storm drain' facilities
,
Sewer and ~omestic water systems
Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines
b.)
c.)
d.)
63. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
64,
All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed
by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City
Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property.
65. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06,
67, The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUfV1F) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the T emecula Muni?ipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety
68,
,
I
I
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, i Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
I
The City of T emecu!a has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation;Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31,2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
I
,
69.
A;\D P\2004\04-0621 Buttertield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
13
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee .
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
70. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No, 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
71. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
72. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
73. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
74. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations, Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
75. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building,
76, Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
77.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
.
78, Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
79. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
80. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
81. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
82. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
83, A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction,
84, Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
85. Show all building setbacks.
86.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.do~
14
.
.
e
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No, 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday
Saturday
6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
7:00 a.m, - 6:30 p,m,
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
Fire Department
87. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed, Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW.(CFC 8704.2 and 902,2.2.2)
!
88. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s), Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (
CFC sec 902)
89, Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. ,(CFC 902,2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2,1)
91. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After
the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be
installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2,2 and National Fire
Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
90.
92. The developer shall provide a public access easement for the trail. All costs associated with
this easement will be borne by the developer.
I
,
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris,
I
,
If additional streetlights are to be installed as a result of this project then, prior to issuance of
building permits or installation of streetlights, whichever occurs first, the developer shall
complete the TCSD 'Streetlight Application, submit an approved SCE streetlight plan with the
signed SCE Streetlight Authorization form and pay the advanced energy fees.
,
I
93.
94.
R:\D P\2004\Q4-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler\COA's revised.doc
15
95.
Landscape construction drawings for the landscaped median on Butterfield Stage Road and
the multi-use trail shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services.
96. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install the landscaped
median and multi-use trails.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butleriield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
16
.
.
.
.
'.
.
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ran~h Shopping Center\COA's revised_doc
17
.
.
.
Planning Department
97. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from
view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is
,
determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof
element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning.
98, All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
99. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been, maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
100. Each parking spase reseryed for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
allixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
,
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign :shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following: '
101. "Unauthorized vehiyles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing
placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's
expense, Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 951 696-3000,"
102. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size. :
103. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
104. All of the foregoing 60nditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit. i
Public Works
105. As deemed necessflry by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
I
a,) Rancho California Water District
R:\D P\2QQ4\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
18
b.)
c,)
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
.
106. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
107. The existing improvements shall be reviewed, Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Department
108. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
109. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property, Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
.
110. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
111. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
112, Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided, The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902,4)
113. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
114. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specifiC commodity class and storag'e
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable .
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
19
.
115. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact lire prevention
for approval.
116. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
117. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
Community Services
118. The landscaped median on Butterfield Stage Road shall be completed, including the
maintenance period and accepted by TCSD.
a,) The construction of the multi-use trails shall be completed.
Other Agencies
119. The applicant shall comply with the letter (attached) sent by the County of Riverside
. Department of Environmental Health dated January 4, 2005.
120. The applicant shall comply with the letter (attached) sent by Rancho Water District dated
December 29, 2004.
121. The applicant shall comply with the letter (attached) sent by the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District dated May 17, 2005,
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Community Development Department approval.
I
Applicant Name
.
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Butterfield Ranbh Shopping Center\COA's revised.doc
20
.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES,
.
.
R:\D P\2004\04.0621 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler\COA's revised.doc
21
o CCJNTY OF RIVERSIDE. HEALl,! SERVICES AGENCY 0
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
. January 4,2005
City of Temecula Planning Department
1',0, Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Stuart Fisk
~\.,\
_~--,-- -.' -~ n, r? \
_.-~ _~ P ,Li,
n,-c ie' ::0 ',: \11 \1 \\\\\.
Ii II '\ ; ( ~~: 1.~ ;J L-' \\ \\
\\~~'JAN 062005 \u\\
\" C--'l
1\1; \
l-Id i
~ __ ___-:=:-..:;;::::::=1
"'v --'-' ,,, .-
.\.- --- --~-.~-
,..._.c~'_
RE: Development Plan No, PA04-0621
Dear Mr. Fisk:
1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Development Plan No. PA04-0621 to
construct five commercial buildings totaling 42,385 sq. ft. on 6.7 acres and has no objections.
Although we have no recent information in regards water and sewer availability, water and
sewer services should be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD
BE REQUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
.
b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330.
c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (955-5055) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
. Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
. Haz'ardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
. Haz'ardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2).
. Waste reduction management.
Sincerely,
~~
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980 '
NOTE: Any current adqitional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
. cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
l(lcal Enforcement Agency. PO. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502-1280. (909) 955.8982 . FAX (909) 781-9653.4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor. r~iverside. CA 92501
tand U5e and Water Engineering. P.O. Box 1206. Hi.versicle. CA 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor. Riverside. CA 92501
(@
Ranchg
Water
Board of Directors
,John E. Hoagland
President
Csaba F. Ko
Sr. Vice President
Stephen J. Corona
Ralph H. Daily
Ben It. Drake
Lisa D. Hennan
Michael R. J\kMillan
OlTIcers:
Brian .J. Brady
General Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Director of Finance-Treasurer
E.P. "Bob" Lemons
DircctorofEngineering
Perry R. Louck
Directol' of Planning
December 2'., 2004
I'~':i~'--;~;-C'-';::~ f? I"
',I :; . : .-. . _ " 1'1../ 1::J n'
Ii U; ,c" '.' '_il,', i I
i' (: JAN 0,3 Z005 Ii II i
1"'1 ')
j"!C :....11
t'3)'_:;:~..;.==----'"".., J
Stuart Fisk, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: WATER A V AILABILlTY
BUTTERFIELD RANCH SHOPPING CENTER
PARCEL NO. I, NO.2, NO.3, AND NO.4 OF PARCEL MAP
NO. 17782; APN 952-200-002 THROUGH APN 952-200-013;
PA04-062I [MCA ARCHITECTS)
Dear Mr. Fisk:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-
site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD
and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
Jorr u, Ao-m,',o". This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium
co",,,II,, development, with individual building owners and an owners' association
Linda M. Fregoso
District Secretary/Administrativemaintaining the conunon property and private water, fire protection, and
S,~i",M"""g" landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD
C. Michael Cowett
Be,' B.-' & R,ie...',J.P requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and
C,,,,m! Con",,! Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to
this agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each
condominium unit.
The project should be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape irrigation.
Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. If you
, should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative
at this office at (951) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Mi ael G. Meyerpeter, p,
Development Engineering Manager
04\MM:atl5IIFCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Rancho Calirornia Walel' District
4'?1:1Ci Winchester Ro;,d . Post Orticp HQX !lOli . TClllecu!a. California 92589,90), . i9;,l}29G.6900. FA." (9[,1)296-6860
W AKKJ::N U, WILLIAMS
General Managcr+Chief Engineer
.
]995 MARKET STREET
RlVERSIDE, CA 9250]
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
94883,1
Ms, Christine Damko
Cily of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERV A nON DISTRICT
May 17, 2005
MAY 1 9 2005
Dear Ms. Damko:
Re:
P A 04-0621
The District does not nomJally recommend condItions lor land divisions or other iand use cases in
incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State
Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases, District
comments/recommendations for such cases are nonnally limited to items of specific interest to the
District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage
facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and
District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition. information of a general
nature is provided.
.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and ,the following comments do not,in
any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to
flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue,
The District has reviewcd this case in the past, sec attached letter dated January 26, 2005.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from
the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval
shou,d not be gitenuntil the City hasdctcffilincd that the projcl'thas been 'granted " pe~mit O~ is
shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a FEMA mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to
provide all studies, calculations,lplans and other infonnation required to meet FEMA requirements,
and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision
(LOMR) prior to occupancy.
The applicant shall show written proof of compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) for any drainage facilities the applicant proposes to be maintained by the District. All
applicable CEQA and MSHCP documents and permits shall address the construction, operation and
maintenance of all onsite and offsite drainage facilities. Draft CEQA documents shall be forwarded
.0 the District during the public review period.
94883,1
Ms. Christine Damko
Re: PA 04-0621
-2-
May 17,2005
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the
applicant to obtain all applicable Federal, State and local regulatory permits, These regulatory
permits include, but are not limited to: a Section 404 Permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers in compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a California State Department of
Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement in compliance with the Fish and Game Code
Section 1600 et seq., and a 401 Water Quality Certification or a Report of Waste Discharge
Requirements in compliance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act or State Porter Cologne Water
Quality Act, respectively, from the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. The applicant
shall also be responsible for complying with all mitigation measures as required under CEQA and all
'Federal, State, amI local environmental rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
~A>~'
,.-
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Riverside County Planning Department
Attn: David Mares
AM:blj
.
.
.
.
ITEM #5
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 20, 2005
Prepared by: Christine Damko
Title: Associate Planner
File Number PA05-0066
Application Type: Tentative Parcel Map
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
PA05-0066 proposes to subdivide four commercially zoned parcels into
seven legal lots with "Parcel 1" designated as open space. (Assessor's
Parcel Number 952-200-002,011,012, and 013).
~ Approve with Conditions
,
,
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
o Categorically Exempt
(Class)
[8J Notice of Determination
(Section
15162)
q Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\J) P\2004\04.062I ButtertielJ Ranch Shopping Cenler\STAFF REPORT revised.doc
I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Vandana Kelkar, MCA Architects
.
Completion Date:
March 2, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
July 20, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Community Commercial (CC)
Zoning Designation:
Community Commercial (CC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site: Vacant
North:
South:
East
Community Commercial (existing commercial)
Medium Density Residentia/(existing single family residences)
Very Low Density Residential (existing/under construction single family
residences)
Highway Tourist Commercial (existing shopping center)
West
Lot Area:
20.33 acres
Total Floor ArealRatio
NIA
.
Landscape Area/Coverage
NIA
Parking RequiredlProvided NIA
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
~ 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
An application for a Tentative Parcel Map was submitted on March 2, 2005, A DRC meeting
was held on March 29, 2005 to discuss subdivision design and other departmental issues, The
applicant submitted revised plans on May 10, 2005. On May 19, 2005, the Tract Map was heard
at the Directors Hearing, but was continued due to agency letters regarding the Initial Study.
ANALYSIS
Map
The Tentative Parcel Map complies with all applicable development standards as' specified in
Table 17.08.040A (Development Standards for developments within planned shopping centers)
of the Development Code, including minimum net lot area, minimum lot frontage on a street,
minimum lot width at required front setback area, minimum lot width and depth. The parcels are
adequately configured to allow for the placement of commercial buildings that will comply with .
front yard, interior side yard, and rear yard setbacks as specified in the Development Code.
R:\D P\2004\04-062! Butterfield Rallch Shopping Center\ST AFF REPORT revised,doc
2
.
.
.
Parcel One is 7.79 acres, Parcel Two 4.89 acres, Parcel Three .61 acres, Parcel Four 2.80
acres, Parcel Five .96 acres, and Parcel Seven is 1.35 acres. An eight foot wide public access
easement and community trail will be located on the northern portion of Parcel 1. The trail will
continue offsite and connect to a regional trail located on the eastern property line of Parcel 1,
Parcel 1 will be preseryed as open space due to Temecula Creek running the entire length of the
parcel.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
I:8J 1. In accordance with the Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project is exempt from
further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance
with CEQA Section 15162-Subsequent Negative Declaration. This project will rely on
the previously approved Negative Declaration for PA04-0621, the Butterfield Ranch
Shopping Center.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
,
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel
Map PA05-0066, based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Tract Map (Code Section 17.05.010F)
1.
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan, and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 33545 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Municipal Code in
that the proposed project meets the design standards as required in the General Plan,
Subdivision Ordinance, and the Municipal Code.
2. The tentative map does not divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into
pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965,
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use,
,
3, The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map,
I
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for commercial uses, which
is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the development standards in the
Oevelopment Code,
4.
The design of the, subdivisjon and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not Ii~ely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
,
,
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for commercial uses, which
R:\D P\2004\04-D62] Buttel'lield Ranch Shopping Center\ST AFF REPORT revised.doc
J
is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, staff has prepared an Initial Study for
the Development Plan and found that there are no significant environmental impacts that .
will result with the development of this project.
5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Department, the
Public Works Department and the Building and Safety Department. As a result, the
project will be conditioned to address their concerns. Further, provisions are made in
the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety and
welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these documents.
6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The proposed' Tentative Tract Map will not alter the approved design of the
Development Plan (PA04-0621) or the future buildings.
7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map.
The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts.
.
8.
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
This is a map for non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 5
2. PC Resolution No. 2005- _ - Blue Page 6 (Tract Map)
Exhibit B - Draft Conditions of Approval for Tract Map
.
R:\D P\2004\04.062I Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center\"o;;;TAFF REPORT n~\'ised.doc
4
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:\D P\2004\04-0621 Buttelfie!d Ranch Shopping Center\STAFF REPORT revised,clol'
5
~1!1! 0 lil"I:llliIil!illlil
~~,!i ~ll'~: ~!: ~il ~!! ~
H;:>e ~~ !!! ~!i ,~i ~~~
I'I'"!- 1-' Ii !. 'II. 1"
. e "',', "I' 'l " ~
!I ! l' II ii
! iI g "
,
.
"
I;
i!.
0'
_'0
11~
I!
"
"
iI~
d~
~... ::[
,j
!,
,"
~~
.
\1 'I'
Ii h!
,. "j
d Ili
""'l"'''''
!:ll' ~
~ii~E~ >>
'-'ljr
~~:;
"~I! ~
,,!.,
~ ~!iI~
~ ~"
! I ~
,
,
g
~!!~I ~ ;lj-'!
" 'I ~ '0 i.
-=.. ~ ~ ,.
iii,' mil
I,!, "'"
~ll 9.~ gj 11 f
, ,
I !
i
,
I
I
!'~
11m
H
;~ nl
:!
.
!
,
,
!
.,
,
'I!ll~
,e.e '"
.;:::o1=~>= ~
~;:!~ r
'!';I~
'jQ
i
,
@@g@@Q@@e
'i 'i 'i .' ~. 'Ii :'! .~. 'I" ~
l! l! l, l! ,i 'l!.l! hi !,! w
~.il !'Ii llil ~i1 I~ iaili'iil !Il P~i1 ~
U !I U ~I ~ ~gt!~ ~ ~ ~!I ~
II " I! III 11'11 ,I,;, o.
I'l, ! ",o,l, I ,j I'!
'I II \' fl.' 111'.+: i' _:' w
- · /'" ! . ". -I!,'
, i' ,..' '--I'
, 'IT' 'I"
j. j, lei I ! i' "
I 1'1'1 ' -
! l '1'1 l !,
· i : I I
I
~~
i~!
" J!
~ n;
al ~
OJ
..,. ~"".~
1111 illi! !il1 ~
!l!ului Ii Ii w
'FI !IP! ~iii
11-"",'
! '! ,ill!! II!!
! i I! I' j!
~: ~~
II .
; ~
i ~ 0
'; ~ ~
i
m
w
. . """,.~ N
H ~~~o
II IIIP ~
'\ Iml
I ~ ! ~ ;l: e;
_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi
~ 0 'io m
! ! i ~
, ~
>
I !a!;'~~:: fl i!i r
,,11' . ~
'!!'" 'z
"l ~~H
',i,'
, ~-'I
,~ ~
. ,
, "
; -
.
"
ps 6j"
~~! ~ i' ~
~~I ~H~Hii! ~
J;I _ j:lila!:l~aa'll
;~~;~;;~~
P"__ ~;H~;E~~
~~~; 5i5fi~i5i5li~ ffi
II 'I ",""~
~:_ i1~!l~l:l~~
~ ~ ........ ......
~ ~ gSgHM
"
:llI
li'-
"'I
III.
~;l"'1l
!.I'
Ib~
~~:~
J;l"::l
Il~~
'.,
~~'jI
~,.~
l'
.,
-.
!i
;
l:.:~. '"
,
I' I'
,
!
I:
~i
I'
". ~
I
I
I
i<
i!
jj 0
"
i~
"
I, 0
l~
,
,
z
:i!
m
0
:;!
0 1;
-i"
miif
Z;::
-i~
,,)> e
?D -i.
0<0
fllmo
c
~s:~
8)>0
~ ""U "
rz ::>:J
~pm
~"'o
",m
.. 01 ~.
- - tj;~
0
"T1
0
:l>
r
~
::>:J
Z
j>
,
,
,
;~i
!~ l~j:1
~ ~ ~)~ ~
~ lJ
~
~
~
iil
i':'i '
"!~II\I <:
jl I,
I (
. !
I
.... ~
-,
, .
.,
;:.,
,
,
.
, ~ ~ , CITY OF TEMECULA "' RE\IlSlOl< ""
, ..~..n."'_"'-
>U'.'"'_'"""'""""'........
, ~ 1- TENTATIVE MAP NO. 33545 Ii] ~~ ~,~~~~ .t.~.:V,J.'~. '. T; ~h~~~
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH &; BUTIERFIELO STAGE RD.
I , (PARCEL MAP 17782 LOTS 1 l><RU 4) "'''''''''-..'''...."..".,-"...-.- - -
NO
0'
fi'iO
,
.,,---
~~~.::_____ 't
,;'+:]~?:'--
.~
.
"
~.~
'....2., ,....
.r
,.5 ....
~- -, '-i--
0" ----'-'-.---
r-~-
!
.-(
G
,.
.
lit
I{/
'!
,~ "..'-.
;, ;\'.::,;"1
/---\
~ ,...-\
r___C"
,"": C'
':::......-' ) I
"'-
(
"
/,----j
.
i
[
.,.,----"'-,
'l j'<:;\:
~-,-'..-- ..---,:
"'-(j;~;~~-~
,"'. .">....
.'
,
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
TENTATIVE MAP NO. 33545
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTI-t '" BUTTERFIELD STAGE RD.
(PARCEL MAP 17782 lOTS 1 THRU 4)
~
REIolSlON
,m
.."'-......-...-
.....""-----...
iii ~L~~.S,~.H. ~"t'tS.~~lI~ !.T.~~)y~~S
_<- ___ ,___0,,,...0 .00....-."" no<H'"
"'-""",.._..,...~r-l ,....no.._____
.
~
!
I~
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005,
R:\D P\2004\04-062\ I3ulterfield Ranch Shopping Center\ST AFF REPORT revised.Joc
6
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005,_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA05-0066, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 33545, TO
SUBDIVIDE 20.33 ACRES (4 EXISTING PARCELS) INTO
SEVEN (7): COMMERCIAL PARCELS, LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH AND
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 952,200,002,011,012,013.
WHEREAS, Michael Schweitzer, Masson and Associates, filed Planning Application No.
PA05-0066, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Subdivision
Ordinance;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA05-0066 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, inlthe time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
I
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA05-0066 on July 20, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the, conclusion of the Planning Commission Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA05-0066
subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No.
PA05-0066 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan;
.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference. ,
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PA05-0066 (Tentative Parcel Map) hereby makes the following findings as required by
Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan, and the City
of Temecula Municipal Code. .
,
Staff has reviewed ithe proposal and finds that Tentative Parcel Map No. 33545 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Municipal Code in
that the proposed p~oject meets the design standards as required in the General Plan,
Subdivision Ordinance, and the Municipal Code.
B. The tentatiJ map does not divide land which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the Califorriia Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land
conservation Act contract bLt the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too
. small to sustain their agricultural use.
G:\PI::mning\2005\P A05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Ccnter- TTM\Planning\Rcso and COA's for PC.doc
]
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use.
.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map.
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for commercial uses,
which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the development standards in the
Development Code.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions
of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The project consists of a Parcel Map on property designated for commercial uses,
which is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, staff has prepared an Initial Study
for the Development Plan and found that there are no significant environmental impacts
that will result with the development of this project.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Department, the
Public Works Department and the Building and Safety Department. As a result, the
project will be conditioned to address their concerns. Further, provisions are made in
the General Plan and the Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety
and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these documents.
.
F. The design of the subdivision provides .for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The proposed Tentative Tract Map will not alter the approved design of the
Development Plan (PA04-0621) or the future buildings.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially
equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided.
All required rights-of-way and. easements have been provided on the Tentative Map.
The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts.
H.
(Quimby).
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
This is a map for non-residential use and will not be subject to Quimby fees.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined
to be consistent with the Negative Declaration related to PA04-0621 and is exempt from further
Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
.
G:\Planlling\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-1TM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PCdoc
- 2
.
.
.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA05-0066 (Tentative Parcel Map 33545) a tentative tract
map to subdivide 20.33 acres (4 existing parcels) into seven (7) commercial parcels located at
on the south east corner of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road, with the conditions of
approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference
together with any other conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula of
Planning Commission this 20th day of July 2005.
David Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
i
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
, 3
I
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2005, by the
following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-006613utterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TfM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\PI;l[J[Jing\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenlcr-lTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
5
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA05,0066
Project Descriptior: A Tentative Parcel Map No. 33545, to subdivide 20.33
acres (4 existing parcels) into seven (7) commercial,
located on the southeast corner of Highway 79 South
and Butterfield Stage Road.
Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 952-200-002,011,012,013
Approval Date: July 20, 2005
Expiration Date: July 20, 2007
WITHIN FORTY,EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made. payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
G:\Planning\2005\P A05-0066 Butterfield ~anch Shopping Center- TTM\Planning\Reso and CONs for PC.doc
6
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
.
.
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0066 BultertieJd Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Rcso and COA's for PC.doc
7
Planning Department c
.
2.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act
and City Ordinance', upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date.
,
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly
notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The applicant shall sign two copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department and return one signed copy to the Planning
Department for thei~ files.
. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
5. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
6. A Grading Permit Jar either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the
Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the
City-maintained road right-of-way.
7. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of "1ny construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
8. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and, irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula
mylars. i .
9. The vehicular movelnent for the driveway on Highway 79 South shall be restricted to a
right in/right out. i
10.
The vehicular movement for the northerly driveway on Butterfield Stage Road shall be
,
restricted to a right in/right out.
,
.
G:\Plarming\2005\PA05-0066 Butlertield Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
8
Fire Department
11.
Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full
force and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
.
,
12. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau, These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related. codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
13.' The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land
division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as'provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A)
14.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix
III-B)
.
15. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A)
16. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix
III-B)
17. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet Minimum turning radius on any
cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for
commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4)
.
G:\Planning\2005\P AO$-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TIM\Planning\Reso and CONs fOf PC-doc
9
.
.
.
18.
All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on
a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii.
19. Cul-de-sacs andlor intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed
travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible
provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
20. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on
each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular
road.
21. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all
internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All
required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction.
Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval
in the field.
22. Any existing water system in support of hydrants or fire sprinkler systems that was
installed as a common system serving the property that will now be divided into more
than one parcel will be the responsibility of ALL PARCELS and will be maintained and
repaired by ALL PARCELS in perpetuity.
23.
Any existing fire lanes, fire department access roads or gates, or any other apparatus,
appliance or surface used to provide emergency fire department access SHALL BE
LEFT UNALTERED in perpetuity.
24. This parcel when divided shall maintain reciprocal access to all parcels
Community Services
25. The map shall identify the eight (8) foot wide Class I trail along Butterfield Stage Road
and along the south side of Temecula Creek with a connection to a Riverside County
regional trail.
26. The property owner shall provide a public access easement dedication over the both
sections of the Class I trails on the Final Parcel Map.
G:\Placming\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield ~anch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Rcso and COA's lor PC.doc
10
\
.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso and CONs for PC-doc
II
.
Planning Department
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department:
a. A copy of the Final Map.
b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
i. This property is located within thirty miles (30) of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting system's shall comply with the
California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory
recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
c. A Reciprocal Use Agreement and maintenance agreement ensuring access to all
parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be
provided and shall be recorded concurrent with the map.
Public Works Department
27.
,
28. Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the follow,ing or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
29.
.
30.
.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. . San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Rancho California Water District
,
c. Eastern MUl]icipal Water District
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
f. Planning Department
g. Department of Public Works
h. Riverside County Health Departrnent
i. Cable TV Franchise
j. Community Services District
k. General Telephone
I. Southern California Edison Company
I
m. Southern California Gas Company
:
The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public
improvements to dty of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted.
Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works:
I
a. Improve Highway 79 South from Butterfield Stage Road to the easterly property
boundary (U~ban Arteria.! Highway Standards - 134' RIW) to include installation of
sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including
I
but not limited to water and sewer), and a raised landscaped median.
,
G:\Planning\200S\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler-'ITM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
12
Improve Butterfield Stage Road from Highway 79 South to the southerly property
boundary (Major Highway Standards - 100' R/W) to include installation of paving,
curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping,
utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and a raised landscaped
median. .
c. The signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road
shall'be modified to accommodate full movement.
b.
31. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the
design of the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00%
minimum over A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207 A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos.
400 and 401.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV
shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provider.
h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed
underground.
e.
f.
g.
32. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
33. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Highway 79 South on the Parcel Map
with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map.
34. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Butterfield Stage Road on the Parcel
Map with the exception of two (2) openings as delineated on the approved Tentative
Parcel Map.
35. An easement for reciprocal ingress/egress shall be provided prior to approval of the
Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
36. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel
Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Ccnter-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC-doc
13
.
.
.
.
.
.
37.
Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian
facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County
Standard No. 805.
38. All easements andlor right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or
abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
39. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the ~ubdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of
an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior
to City Council approval of the Parcel MaplFinal Map, the Developer shall make an
application for reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
40. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
41. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with
the map.
42. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
43.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of
the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such
agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to
acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision.
Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount
given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
i
44. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation. District for approval prior to recordation of the Parcel MaplFinal Map
or the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation Distri~t is required for work within their right-of-way.
45.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
I
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
i
I
Easements for sidel(Valks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
I
,
Easements, when: required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
I
46.
47.
48.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0066 IJutterfield:Ranch Shopping Ccnter-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
: 14
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for
review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage .
facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage
easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating
"drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. "
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Cenler-TfM\Planning\Reso and COA's fOf PC.doc
15
.
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Pbnning\2005\PA05~0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
]6
.
.
.
Department of Public Works
49. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
1
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
50. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect'the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
.
51. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections.
52.
A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of
the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private,
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an
adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or
private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of
all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the
storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for
analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
53.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pOllution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in:the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
a combination of strlJctural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs
,
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to ientering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall alb provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
I
1
G:\PI:.Jnning\2005\PAOS-0066 Buttcrficld,Ranch Shopping Ccnter-TrM\Pbnning\Rcso and COA's for PC.dnc
, 17
54.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
.
55. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
56. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work
performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
57. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps as Flood Zone "A"
and is subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prior to the approval of any plans, the
Developer shall demonstrate that the project complies with Chapter 15.12 of the
Temecula Municipal Code for development within Flood Zone "A". A Flood Plain
Development Permit is required prior to issuance of any permit. Residential subdivisions
shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) prior to occupancy of any unit. Commercial subdivisions may obtain a
LOMR at their discretion.
58.
Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map
including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a
ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83
(California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to
completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0066 IJuttertield Ranch Shopping Ccnter-TrM\Planning\Reso and CONs for PC.doc
18
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
G:\Pl:mning\2005\PA05-0066 Buttertleld,:Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso und COA's for PC.doc
. 19
.
.
.
Planning Department
59.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's letter dated March 15, 2005, a copy of which is attached.
I
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Flood Cohtrol District's letter dated May 17, 2005, a copy of which is attached.
I
60.
,
61. The applicant shall 'comply with the recommendations set forth in the Pechanga Cultural
Resources letter dated May 27,2005, a copy of which is attached.
Department of Public Works
62. Parcel Map shall b~ approved and recorded.
63. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report
addressing compaction and site conditions. '
64. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards'
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
65.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08. .
Fire Department
67. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed.: Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building fin11, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an e*terior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC see' 902)
I
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. :(CFC 902.2.2.1)
,
I
68.
69.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping CClltcf+TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
20
70.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
71. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than
35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 90221)
72. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company. the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
73. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TIM\Planning\Reso and COA's for PC.doc
21
.
.
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY
i
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping CClltcr-TIM\Planning\Reso and CO'\'5 for rCdoc
I 22
I
I
.
.
.
Department of Public Works
74.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Mu~icipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
75. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
76. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
77. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Fire Department
78. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
79.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all of the
above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
i
"
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center-TTM\Planning\Reso and COA's lor pedoc
23
.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
.
,
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0066 Buttertield Ranch Shopping Cel1ter~TTM\Planning\Rcso and COA's fot" PC.doc
24
@
Rancho
later
BoardofDlredors
Csaba F. Ko
Pr~sident
Ben R. Drake
'Sr. Vice President
Stephen J. Corona
Ralph H. Daily
Lisa D. Herma.n
John E. Hoagland
Michael R. McMillan
Officers:
Brian J. Brady
General Manager
Phillip L. Forbes
Director of Finance-1'reaslIrer
E.P. "Bob" Lemons
Director of Engineering
Perry R. Louck
Dirertor of Planning
Jeff D. Armstrong
Controller
Linda M. Fregoso
DistrictSecretarylAdministrative
Services Manager
C. Michael Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
GeneralC-ounsel
March IS, 2005
Christine Damko, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
MAR 1 8 Z005
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. XXXXX
BUTTERFIELD RANCH SHOPPING CENTER
PARCEL 1 THROUGH PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP
NO. 17782; APN 952-200-002 THROUGH APN 952-200-013
PA05-0066 [MASSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.]
Dear Ms. Damko:
Please be. advised that the above-referenced properly is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or
off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property
owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if
any, to RCWD.
RCWD owns and operates a production well and a pwnping station at the
southeast corner of State Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. These
facilities must remain in operation at all times. The developer should consult
with RCWD regarding facility access and maintenance requirements.
This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium
development with individual building owners and an Owner's Association
maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection and
landscape irrigation facilities. RCWD requires that the City of Temecula
include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site
private water facilities, as a condition of approval for the project. In addition to
this agreelnent, RCWD would require individual water meters for each
condominium unit.
4~ (O/h
<J'i-'ii~-,..l H:ANCIIO
"glm" C:ALIFOI..f.NIA
it "VATER
~ DISTRICT
~"""'".,.",.".."'...,'"..
.,"",-,-;,',0
Rancho California Wah~l' District
.12135 Winchl'~tcr R'I[ld . ,PO!;l Oflice Bo:< 9017 . Tf'l11E'cub. California 92.~,39.9U17 . 19.0,1, 2%-6900 . F..\X (go)l} 296.6860
Christine Damko/City of Temec"la
March 15,2005
Page Two
The project should be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape irrigation. Requirements
for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this
office at (95 I) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DIST~CT
-!fMjJit
Michael G. Meyerpeter, P .
Development Engineering Manager
051MM:ac0631FCE
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
@
Rancho CalifOl'nia Water Distrkt
421:3,~ Wincheder Hoad ~ Pusl om~<, Bo" 901, . T~",('('ul,.. Calif"rni<l 92!'iS9.!)()i" . ISh! j 296.(l~IO(J . FAX (\1[>1) 2~)(-;.(jS60
nc......c.LvO:::.....;
:.co, 10'........... :::>.............~.v"
-T..........' .
................................., ".-....... . ..-- -
NO. 097 P.2/3
J 995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
MAY. 18. 2005 9:31AM
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
Geild-al Ma~a8erwChjefEnsineer
.
.
.
93845.1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
May 17,2005
~
Ms. Christine Damko
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Dear Ms. Damko:
Re: P A 05-0066
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in
incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land l.I5e cases, or provide State Division.
of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations
for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master
Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered
a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees
(development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comment does not in any
way constitute or imply Distr,ict approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood
hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue:
This project proposes, channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities
that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of Temecula Creek
Channel. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request
of the City. Facilities must be CQnstructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative
fees will be required.
In accordance with Assessment District 159, a drainage easement should be set aside (along the
eastern boundary) to allow conveyance of flow from the north side of Highway 79 to Temecula
Creek.
GENERALINFO~ATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the
State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation or other final approval
should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown
to be exempt. I
I
I .
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plaiD, then
the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other infonnation
required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of
the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
. ntvr::-l.vtlJ; O/IO/V'" =.':>V,",I~I. --....~,. ....., ,.......................-.. .~.~..... ...__ _
MAY. lB. 2005 9:31AM
NO. 097
P.3/3
93845.1
Ms. Christine Damko
Re: P A 05-0066
May 17,2005
-2-
The applicant shall show written proof of compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Plan (MSHCP) for any drainage facilities the applicant proposes to be maintained by the District. All
applicable CEQA and MSHCP documents and permits shall address the construction, operation and
maintenance of all onsite and off site drainage facilities. Draft CEQA documents shall be forwarded to
the District during the public review period.
If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the
applicant to obtain all applicable Federal, State and local regulatory permits. These regulatory permits
include, but are not limited to: a Section 404 Perrillt issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in
compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, a California State Department of Fish and Game
Streambed Alteration Agreement in compliance with the Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq.,
and a 401 Water Quality Certification or a Report of Waste Discharge Requirements in compliance
with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act or State Porter Cologne Water Quality Act, respectively, from
the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board, The applicant shall also be responsible for
complying with all mitigation measures as required under CEQA and all Federal, Srate, and local
environmental rules and regulations.
Very truly yours,
~ay
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Riverside County Planning Departmimt
Attn: David Mares
AM:blj
.
.
.
I
I'
Chairperson:
Germaine Arenas
,
PECHANGA CULTURAL RESOURCES
Temecula Band of Luiserlo Mission Indians
Vice Chairperson:
Mary Bear Magee
Post Office Box 2183 . Temecula, CA 92593
Telephone (909) 308-9295 . Fax (909) 506-9491
Committee Members:
Raymond Basquez, Sr.
Evie Gerber
Darlene Azzarelli
Bridgett Barcello Maxwell
Frances Villalobos
May 27,2005
Monitor Supervisor:
Aurelia Marruffo
JUL 0 5 Z005
Director:
Gary DuBois
Ms. Christine Damko, Project Planner
City of Temecula Planning Department
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Re: Comments on Pre-DRC Notice for Tentative Tract Map for the Butterfield
Ranch Sho'pping Center - P A 05-0066
Dear Ms. Damko,
.
This comment letter is submitted by the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians (hereinafter,
"Pechanga Tribe"), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The Pechanga
Tribe is formally requesting, pursuant to Public Resources Code g21 092.2, to be notified and
involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration ofthe above
referenced project (the "Project").
We submit the following comments on the above listed document for the Project.
Additional comments maybe submitted directly by Pechanga or through their attorneys. We
request that all such comments be part of the official record for the approval ofthis Project.
We also request that the County provide us with copies of all archeoiogical studies,
reports, site records, proposed testing plans, and proposed mitigation measures, and conditions as
soon as they become available, for our comment.
THE LEAD AGENCY MUST INCLUDE AND CONSULT WITH THE TRIBE IN ITS
I REVIEW PROCESS
.
Sacred /05 The Dut)' Trusted VlltO Our Care Alld With HOllOI' We Rise To The Need
Pechanga comment letter to City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Comments on Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center Tract Map
Page 2
It has been the intent of the Federal Governmentl and the State ofCalifornia2 that Indian
tribes be consulted with regard to issues which impact cultural and spiritual resources, as well as
other governmental concerns. The responsibility to consult with Indian tribes stems from the
unique government-to-government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. This
arises when tribal interests are affected by the actions of governmental agencies and departments
such as approval of Specific Plans and EIRs. In this case, it is undisputed that the project lies
within the Luiseiio tribe's traditional territory. Therefore, in order to comply with CEQA and
other applicable Federal and California law, it is imperative that the Lead Agency and the Project
applicant consult with the Tribe in order to guarantee an adequate basis of knowledge for an
appropriate evaluation of the project effects, as well as generating adequate mitigation measures.
PROJECT IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES
The Pechanga Tribe is not opposed to this development project. The Pechanga Tribe's
primary concerns stem from the project's likely impacts on Native American cultural resources.
The Pechanga Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural
resources, such as Luiseiio village sites and archaeological items which would be displaced by
ground-disturbing work on the project, and on the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items,
Native American human remains and sacred items likely to be discovered in the course ofthe
work. The Tribe would also like to point out that a preferred method oftreatment for
archeological sites according to the CEQA is avoidance (California Public Resources Code
g21083.l), and that this is in agreement with the Tribe's practices and policies concerning
cultural resources.
The Pechanga Tribe asserts that the Project area is part of the Pechanga Tribe's aboriginal
territory, as evidenced by the existence of Luiseiio place names rock-art pictographs,
petroglyphs, and an extensive artifact record in the vicinity of the Project. Given this threshold
for scope ofPechanga traditional territory, the Pechanga Tribe is concerned about the potential
impacts to LuiseiiolPechanga resources which may occur throughout the Project area. The
Pechanga Tribe contends that the Project area is likely to contain cultural resources due to the
fact that approximately eight (8) sites are recorded within a I-mile radius. Given all the
information, there is a very strong likelihood of locating sub-surface resources during ground
disturbing activities.
In addition, this Project is in close proximity to the Temecula Creek, which is a very well
known and documented habitation area for the LuiseiiolPechanga people. The entire corridor of
Hwy 79, with the width of that corridor extending from the Temecula Creek to Pauba Road to
the north is a travel and trade route, as well as containing permanent habitation routes along the
I See Executive Memorandum of April 29, .1994 on Government-to-Government Relations with Native American
Tribal Governments and Executive Order of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.
2 See California Public Resource Code ~5097.9 et seq.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Pechanga comment letter to City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Comments on Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center Tract Map
Page 3
length of it. In addition to the habitation areas along this corridor, there are many burial and
ceremonial areas. It is important to note that human remains have previously been found on an
adjacent parcel to this tract, the exact nature of which will be disclosed to the City during
consultation with the Tribe.. This area which comprised the tract map is located in an extremely
culturally sensitive area tq the Pechanga Tribe, and the cultural significance must be taken into
account when evaluating project environmental impacts.
I
The Pechanga Tribe's knowledge ofthe continuous occupation ofthe Luisefio people in
this geographical area for .thousands of years, through their stories and songs, are cultural
evidence that subsurface sites may exist in this Project area. Therefore, the Pechanga Tribe
requests that in the case of discovery of new or additional sites or resources, that the Lead
Agency re-evaluate the Project impacts to cultural resources and adopt appropriate mitigation
measures to address such., The Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its legal rights with respect to
additional finds of signifidant sites or cultural resources which are of sacred and ceremonial
significance to the Pechanga Tribe.
i
Given that Luiseno cultural resources will likely be affected by the Project, the Pechanga
Tribe must be allowed to be involved and participate with the Lead Agency and the Project
Applicant in developing all monitoring and mitigation plans for the duration ofthe Project.
Further, given the potential for archaeological resources within the Project area, it is the position
of the Pechanga Tribe that Pechanga tribal monitors should be required to be present during all
ground-disturbing activities conducted in cOlmection with the project, including any
archeological testing performed. It is further the position of the Pechanga Tribe that an
Agreement regarding appropriate treatment of cultural resources be drafted and entered into.
Further, the Pechanga Tribe believes that if human remains are discovered, State law
would apply and the mitigation measures for the permit must account for this. According to the
California Public Resources Code, S 5097.98, if Native American human remains are
discovered, the Native American Heritage commission must name a "most likely descendant:'
who shall be consulted as to the appropriate disposition ofthe remains. Given the Project's
location in Pechanga territory, the Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its right pursuant to
California law with regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this project. And,
accordingly, the Pechanga Tribe further requests that the Lead Agency work with the Tribe to
draft an agreement which would address any inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources,
including human remains.
Also, surveys and grading may reveal significant archaeological resources and sites
which may be eligible for inclusion in the historic site register, and may contain hwnan remains
or sacred items. Therefore, we request that the Lead Agency commit to evaluating Project
I
environmental impacts to any cultural sites that are discovered during archeological testing and
grading, and to adopt appropriate mitigation for such sites, in consultation with the Pechanga
Tribe. I
I REQUESTED MITIGATION
Pechanga comment letter to City of Temecula Planning Department
RE: Comments on Butterfield Ranch Shopping Center Tract Map
Page 4
The Tribe requests that appropriate assessment of the archeological and cultural resources .
on the Project property be evaluated to determine significant and appropriate treatment by a
qualified archeologist in conjunction with the Pechanga Tribe. Any such testing should involve
the Tribe, and all tests to determine impacts should be completed prior to Project approval.
For the reasons above, the Pechanga Tribe requests the following mitigation measures be
adopted at the present time. Upon completion of a thorough archeological assessment additional
mitigation measures may be necessary.
1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Project ApplicantJDeveloper is
required to enter into a Pre-Excavation Agreement with the pechanga Band ofLuisefio Indians.
This Agreement wiIl address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human
remains that may be uncovered during construction as weIl as provisions for tribal monitors.
2. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shaIl be allowed to
monitor all grading, excavation and ground-breaking activities within native soils in the Tribe's
aboriginal territory, including further surveys, to be compensated by the Project
ApplicantJDeveloper. The Pechanga Tribal monitors will have the authority to temporarily stop
and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources
discovered on the property, in conjunction with the archeologist and the Lead Agency.
4. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including
all Luisefio sacred items, burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the Project .
area to the Pechanga Band ofLuisefio Indians for proper treatment and disposition.
5. All sacred sites within the Project area are to be avoided and preserved.
The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with City of Temecula Planning
Department, the Lead Agency and other interested agencies in protecting the invaluable Luisefio
cultural resources found in the Project area. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (951) 308-9295 or Laura Miranda at (951) 676-2768, Ex!. 2137. Thank you for the
opportunity to submit these comments.
Sincerely,
"
i,! j{fUCft. E. ~aJjiC
.J 7v1 {J
Stephanie Gordin
Cultural Analyst
.
.
ITEM #6
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 20, 2005
Prepared by: Christine Damko
Title: Associate Planner
File Number: PA05-0100
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
Application Type: Development Plan
A Development Plan to construct a one story office building
tbtaling 12,411 square feet located on the south west corner of
Madison Avenue and Buecking Avenue (APN: 910-272-013).
~ Approve with Conditions
CJ Deny
I
CJ Continue for Redesign
,
CD Continue to:
,
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
.
~ Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15332
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~OIOO Madison ~t 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
]
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Peter Minegar
Completion Date:
April 6, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
July 20, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Zoning Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant lot
Vacant lot/existing commercial building
Vacant lot
Existing commercial building
Vacant lot
Lot Area:
1.13 acres
Building Summary:
Proposed 12,411 square foot building
Building Height:
22 feet
.
Total Floor Area/Ratio: .26
Landscape Area/Coverage: 13,969 square feet / 28%
Parking Required/Provided: 52 required / 52 provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
A Pre-Application was submitted on January 3,2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 10,
2005 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture, and other departmental issues. On April 6, 2005,
a formal Development Plan application was submitted. On May 12, 2005, a second DRC
meeting was held with the applicant. A DRC letter was mailed on May 17, 2005 and the
applicant resubmitted on June 1, 2005.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Service Commercial (SC) zoning
district. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and .
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
2
.
.
.
the 0.26 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district. The building
footprint includes varied setbacks from 5 to 12 feet, which reduce the mass of the building and
add architectural interest.
Architecture
I
The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines and is
compatible with other adjacent buildings within the vicinity. The building is constructed of
concrete tilt-up painted a smooth finis and is located towards the corner of Buecking Avenue and
Madison Avenue, while the associated parking is located behind the structure, adding interest to
the streetscape on both roads. A patio with a covered trellis located on the east side of the
building adds to the architectural interest of the building as well as providing a shaded common
area for employees and customers. Metal awnings extend out three feet frorn each individual
entry and slate tiles are placed above and below the awnings for additional' emphasis. Twelve
inch pop-outs around the, building add interest and break up the mass of the building. The
building has rooflines varying from 19 to 22 feet in height, with a decorative metal cornice to tie
in with the sleek, modern qrchitecture.
Landscapinq
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree' and shrub placement will serve. to effectively screen on site parking
areas and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 13,969
square feet or 28 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum 20 percent landscaping
requirement in the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides landscaping around the
perimeter of the site, with landscape setbacks ranging from 13 to 25 feet along Buecking Avenue
and Madison Avenue. The, project also proposes varied landscape setbacks around the building
footprint. I
Access and Circulation
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact for the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed
the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency
services to the site. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated
to utilize the site, as well as emergency vehicles. One loading space is provided along the south
side of the building, thereby meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the
Development Code. ,
I
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
i:8J 1. In accordance wit~' the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to b~ categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section
15332, In-Fill Development Projects.
I
I
I
I
i
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0IOO Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT tcmplate.doc
3
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
.
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached
conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan(17.05.01 OF)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for T emecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Service
Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan
has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light manufacturing
uses, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service Commercial designation.
The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined conditioned by the
Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building
and Fire Codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of .
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plan Reductions - Slue Page 5
2. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison LoI ] 3-DP\P[;.mning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
4
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
.
PLAN REDUCTIONS
.
G:\Plannjng\2005\PA05~OIOO Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template. doc
5
.
N
,
>
~ llJ
'I'
1,01 ".
g!"'1 t:>! ~
~ ::.z
H <:
" N
:~
CV') <;(
""" Cl::
I- a
0
-.I CI)
<: I-
0 (J
CJ) llJ
--
a I-
~ ""-
:t:
CJ) (J
~ Cl::
<;(
.
~
f
o
z
0,
0<
~
~
~
:; ~
~ ~
> ~
~;t~
;j!iil~~!
%'::!~jg~:;j
c;g'3:.l:;l::::~'~~
t;;to:;;
CO"''''
';;,Sj'g:
~~:j
.
. ! ;
8 g:
00.
~~~
0<,
-< . ~~
m ;,
o -' :~>-
~~~~~~I~~
~
I~
~.(c.~;
&o~ii
<-t.>+_ I "
v1;" I ~
,
"
,
g U
~~E
"
o
.
o
,
~~
o.
~ o~ ~~ ~
it g~ j ~~ ~z~
il!III!!!!lII!lil!!lili
<
z
g~
o
~
00
'S~
M:
~~
"
.:5~
f.:s
-'L
~g
'0
~i
filJ1
:.:51"'
1'10
j:iil!i
La
.
1
.
'U 1
.~
z' '
%/
I Z\
I 31.i I
I! '5 '\ ""~'
~~ CD I ~
:i'a \
j; '1;t:~li ':j\ ~\
, , '
/ .,.- I,'
/ /
1 //
; ",<0 /
I ~~~~ li
, i;;i if ~i
8 ~c; w
~~
I
I
i
I l
I
~g
~~
I
~~
i!
e
!
I~)
I ~i~!
'"I'"
'""I
LLJ
.
I
mm
dt'i(j;:;o
:;;g: -
~Ii
':;:3
,
!
'>E"l
!.1~
a.
~~
t;i"
~
! ~II ' ~.l
.... ,01
i I~, Pf
;~.
~ '"
~ b
o -
o
~~
'.'
s.H.!
,l5lH!
1'<1:
~ii!
~ i'i;t
l}jH!
jZ\
~dM
i~m~
~
;:::
:'::
'"
Li:!
Ii':
Il::
'0
j<:
,
I
;~l
~i
Ilt~j
,. - ,
__~l"~=I
fill"" I
! 1'>tl,jf
--~iiJ"""j
c, -j
I~ '
i I
~
i
~
,
g
-------..-...-j---
I.-I
~~~
---- '11];,,1
'I .';1,
--;\':j,;;-..-
,-- i
j . ~ ,
I I" !
! ! ~ ~ i
I ~ ~ . ~
I III ,
'~ ~ ~ ~ I I
, " , I
~ I } i i ~
., ~ f! ~ ~
~ ~~~I:~~ I
Ii H!l H: I
I!~I
i '--' I
,-,---~.~,-I
i
i
e--
~
@----
6>---
i ,
,------~::~=~:~~~-.=-!
~ ~II ~l
;~ :1
i II1II '!
<:
o
;:::
:'::
'"
Li:!
'-
OJ
L5
<-I
j"!.
'H~
~jf;
lU:i
~gH
Q~f~!
:..~'
-
'< ;,
.
~~~~~
~ Hj~~
pm~
~
~
"
0,
~~
t~
lJ..J
~
<:
':t:
Cl::
a
CV)
~
I-
a
....,J
CI)
I-
(.)
lJ..J
I-
- .
:t:
(.)
Cl::
':t:
<:
a
~
Q
~
Cf)
~
jc".~;=~~='~~-~.~;;, J=_'_=~;;\~-
I " , ! \
J >,,_! ,i \ \ ~K ~~
r'~ + J~~"II~~;=II
i i . . c. ~~ i ii;~~~~~~t___-L
! - I
-/----
"
I ,
i "
I I~ "
" .'.
., "
I ~~~ i! II!;!
"
i i ~!'l: Ii'
. j ii' ~>l: ~iU~
I ! :o:i !Ii nil!
I ,
i
:~
~
.
b 1
i~ ,~.'
S:-"
,
ik
.
~.
L P
~?: ,>
,.
t
~
;~
8""-
g~
~;
;~
d
! ~II ~j
..,. ",<oJ
i I~, ~~I
Ill!!
,!oj!
H~i
~Ifll
9 l~tt
.I:n
,.
;~'
~ ~
^ .
" '
,
.
<< ~~t~ ~
~ ~~~~~
~ "''-'2.....:;:;
w"-.,;;:"''''
~ ~n~;
~ ::>",~e;::
o
~
~
a:
o
o
~
~
,
i
,
~
.
,
lJ..J
".
~, <;;1 \!)
;' ~ ~~
. <
" ~~
. (V) '<(
c
~ a:::
f- a
a
...J U)
<: I-
a ()
. CI) lJ..J
-
Q I-
~ -.
n :t
~~
! CI) ()
~ a:::
'<(
"
'00...
'cf,,",,
'~
'<"0
'",
.~
N~'a;~ )',"]I.r8
o
l.i.._
["8-1
L~j
/]"
~I;
$
!I
'I ,
: ~ :
l_~_J
~~
''''~''''
.
"
'c,
~.S/I:JeIO;S
~~'~
...., ""',
.
.--'s
Ix i
LiJ
~
'f
....
'0,,,-
'~""
~i
...,J
itl
.,
~II
"
~I
"J/
'O~<i'/
~
-~..~
':;;i",_o"
'~/~l_iJ
J.OO, ~Jd.g(' ld01S )
:8
'-.;L._
l()(Jl~:J,;.g/1 ;c(0S )
~
>";~",
r"s'1
,..., ,
L_;L;
':>
_:~~-~;
,:(;\l:T
'8'--:
'~
'~,'"
i ~ i
L.~mj
~
Ce
!
~II ~~!
~..-.L.. .,1
'-'I~ "<>1
111I1 ~!
,11:1
IlPH
I".
t~,~
AI,
~ t(~t
@-t;lf
~i"~
t.'~'.
~ ~
o .
" ,
L".
~~~,;;~
~ 5~~1~
~ ~u~~
~
z
<<
~
~
~
o
o
'"
"HJ",
z -
0
~: >=
u
~ w
w
, "
, z
a
~
, S
m
-
G
~
, Lu
c
o. ~
0'
, ~~ <:
~::;
""
. ('t) oq::
, ~ Cl:::
G t-
O
0
-' (J)
t' t-
<: (J
1--:,".:1 -'---.,.:.,i- 0
}-------.i>-7.:---- U) Lu
- t-
Cl
~ - -
::t
U) (J
~ Cl:::
oq::
.
.
.
III
~ 'I I I
~ '
or; I j
1
_m ---"., *" --'0
~__""""'_"'WlI" . ,
~NINNVld S3Wl1JYJ NOUV311:l]ll , .
LIOZ':>S""3!I"!"JO/!ID:l '
3~nlJ3UH:)l:IV 3cNOSONVl ,
dnOOO VlJ8l'lVKlV ;
~tEUa.I'-",",JH:X)lU.L__us..I"'~____H.I cici
>>
.<lIIml't:)~'3\lIQlB1H3:I~1iOUZ .
NOSlCJVI'tssn ......, i::] to'; .,
-
81101 NOSta'ffl SSI'I '""'"' . 0 w 0
~.fi I '0
~
Z
<(
..J
j'! , a...
, , "
II i" 'I' i !~ I I Z
II 1111 i > F
, , ~. Z
; ~ @ ,
'" '! ~ <(
~" 'I' 11~lli ..J
t:: t tt ~~ a...
Iii ilgf,i ,Iii Iii >-
,- ., !~!ii a::
,. S ~? gl:IIII.! <(
i . ~hl ~i ~ z
1:i<5:: -'.. ..." ~
~ ~ z
.. ~ ~ ::~~ ..J
jilll w
a::
i ! ~ , a...
Ii "'
-r-----------
I
i '.It
, 'I~t?~
\ 1 jll
\ ;:1"1
\lllil
\
\
w'
2\
'&'
'i\
~.
~\
'<
,
3nN3M NOSIOVVi
~
\
,
\
,
\
\
\
\
-'-
---
,,',.;,/
...,,)1:)..
~
I I
;
. !
I I
! ~
~ ~ ~ II ll!l! I I
" ,
I II , .. .......... ! i
" ! 11 ~~~~2 "
I -- - - n:na , ~
,
i :W ;; I;;;; I i
-. '" - ~ "'... "
1
~ ~ ~ !I j- . !
1 ,!H "'I V
;1 ! I;, ,
I "'j !Iii I !
I"~
~ ~ '"
. "
, I ! "
. ~ iI
U ~ IP~ J
;5 ~ ~ . I, i
lOll ~- h !
1 " * l ~ I., I
'il' ",' I
I ,. . Iii 11'1
I' !
~ ~ ~ ,.,
i ~ l !; ,
~ ,:. - <> .~ '.. !
I' !:':i:~! t: ~ ~ _! .,
! I!! I II! !hlldv
! 00 . 00 0 f fl
00 @ . e
I
!
"
~ ..b~ lJ
I ~ IiI, lh I
~ 8 ~ h';~ i ~
~~ I ~ ~ :r~r : i
~"1;!6~" ~ ~:;I ~. I
"..._~_~I!J:rfl
~~;;~ ~ :!..~b~ !'l
~dE ! ~ II "I!! ~ n
<.~.." t I
S i ;it
~ ;
~ ,I I
~ ,! 'I '
~;, ~! i
~ II ~ I' l"
> "t ,2
~ tt ~!'I ,i .l"
~ II ~ ,~il' Ii 0 i
~"" ;!'i' 1, '
<:s a~ ::!;: i ~ ~ i::
G
I
o
~,
G'
o
~,
r
,:
i ':
,
,
.' ._1
Ii \
", ,
.-
"
;;f::J'"
00 <
~"'i.1
Il.~~
I/i
. 1/ '/ "
i jf / ,I
:k U ,11,\ ,i
I"~ J It" ,
i II ~-'-='-fif'
I i' I
I J/
if!
Iii
"
;;tj...
N..9
ll,l~
/1
... ~"':;'; I
i~';F;i'/i
; ,
i /
~
.
if
,
'"
Ii!
/ Ii
Ii
! i'
f if
! I;
I ij
/ /i
1"
i Ii
i iI
, 1/
,
I Ii
, if
II!
II!
/i
/,
Ii
Ii
.,
, I
1/
/1
I'
i i
! I
I
. /;;:~.'r;
",,-".
---
-
1/
/' ,
.7"
i t~ /
<;::;;.~
",/---
-"."":::.
.-
;;j:~
~r:;j
Q,I~
",';'
~!i
$~ !;
...~ J
'" ~
~
,
,
,
i
~ >
~ S~-
"'- a..0l1
~ ~~~
i! <s~~
!i "l:::!::::!;
~ ....ll..c
>-':;i...,,h
~I!:-~
:5 ~~(jll.
G ::;I'::~
W ~~....:
2 3 o..~o..
~
.
u.
o
(I)
J J! ~
,1
, .
~! Ji
" i
. ! _!
~
~ ~ !f
" w
!i ~
.
I,
!
I
. I
I I ,.
(0
;1 i~ .
f JO
~~
~<.i
~
I
.
!
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lor I J-DPlPlanning\PC STAFF REPORT rempbte.doc
"
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05,(nOO, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
ONE STORY OFFICE/SHOWROOM BUILDING TOTALING
12,411 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH WEST
CORNER 0F MADISON AVENUE AND BUECKING AVENUE
(APN: 910-272-013).
WHEREAS, peterl Minegar filed Planning Application No. PA05-0100 (Development
Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code; I .
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prJscribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the PI1nning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on July 20, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the iconclusion of the Commission hearing and after dUe consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings
set forth hereunder; I'
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
I
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.l. '
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal
Code: I
I
A. The propos~d use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirementd of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is donsistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Service Commerci~1 (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light
manufacturing usJs, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service
Commercial desig~ation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations
outlined and conditioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes.
B. The overallldevelopment of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
I
I
I
I
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison.Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
I
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of .
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Service Commercial Development Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance
standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section
15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct a one-story office/show room
building totaling 12,411 square feet located on the south west corner of Madison and Buecking
with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed
necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20lh day of July 2005.
David Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
.
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot I3-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA' )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE I ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske; Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at ~ regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission:
I
AYES: PLANilNG COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANI'NG COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANI'NG COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison WI 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.<loc
4
.
.
.
I
Planning Application No.:
Project DescriPtio1n:
DIF Category:
MSHCP Category:
TUMF:
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PA05,0100
A Development Plan to construct a one story
service commercial building totaling 12,411
square feet located on the south west corner
of Madison Avenue and Buecking Avenue
(APN: 910,272-013).
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
910-272-013
July 20, 2005
July 20, 2007
WITHIN FORTY-EIGHT (48) HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to th1e County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administratiye fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required
under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. If Within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison LOt 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
5
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-f)P\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
6
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with LegalCounsel of the City's
own selection frorh any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to 'attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from I any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions I approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumkntality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsei, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant~ and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applidble and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
The permittee shlll obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this deVelopment plan.
I
,
This approval shall I be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and Void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval. i
The Director of PI~nning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, ;one year at a time.
I
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
,
I
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the ~Ianning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenknce of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any sJccessors in interest.
I
I
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the sJrrounding parapet wall.
Trash enclosures stall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all
utilities, which are t6 be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
If at any time dLring excavation/co~struction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any a'rtifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeolbgical resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
I
I
G,IPlaoning\200S\PAOS-OlOO Madison r 13-DPlPlanninglPC RESOL~TION AND COA,doc
,
,
.
.
8.
.9.
10.
11.
.
Planning Department
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at .
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it-deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
signiticance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
13. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
14. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
15.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission tor its decision.
.
Material
Main Body texture and color
Accent Color
Accent Color
Accents
Awnings
Finish and Color
Frazee Paint #8711W "Misty Mica"
Frazee Paint #8713W "Kindling Wood"
Frazee Paint #8724W "Wildcat'
Slate Tile
Metal
16. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
Public Works
17. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
18. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA_doc
8
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
,
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building: Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire preventidn Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all tommercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual ~perating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow 'of 2350 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during th~ approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protebion measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given abo~e has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A) I
The Fire preventiJ Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Tab!e A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any: adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be re~uired. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
I
As required by the ICalifornia Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exteriorlof the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flqw shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phksed, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building!construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
GWlanning\2~05\PA05-0100 Madi"", 1. I 3-DPlPlanning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
9
.
24.
25.
.
26.
27.
28.
.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.'
Community Servicesl '
20. The trash enclosuies shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid wastd containers.
The' developer shkll contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debri~. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
I
The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
All parkways, laJscaPing, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
I . . .
property owner or maintenance aSSOCiation.
19.
21.
22.
23.
Fire Department
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
.
.
,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lpt 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
]0
.
.
.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
Planning Department
29.
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for .verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
I
The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which' meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinanc~. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impa6t the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
I
A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department. j
The applicant sh,!1I comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by prbviding documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
I
A copy of the gr~ding, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
,
,
A permit from Riyerside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-way.
I
A Grading Plan shkll be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion :control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
30.
31.
32.
Public Works
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
I
I '
A Soil Report shall I be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
I
The Developer sha.1I have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
,
and upstream of t~is site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impact~ to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the prope\lies and mitigate any impacts, Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required irrlprovements. shalt be provided by the Developer.
I
I
I
I
I
,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison tot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
II
39.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities.' Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
a combination of structural and non-structural on site source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
40. . As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
41.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
,subject property.
42. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot [3~DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.uoc
12
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
13
.
.
.
Planning Department
43.
Three (3) copies of, Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the FPlanning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptuallandsc<!pe plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate' filing fee (per the City of Temecula' Fee Schedule at time of
submittal). I
I
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
,
c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
d. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
,
f. Total cost e~timate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
I
g. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
44. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and
appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-toot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
45. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
46. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans.
47. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International
Orange".
48. Provide a detail of ' the metal trellis on the construction plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director. :
I
49. Provide a detail of tre outside furniture proposed for the site on the construction plans to
the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Building Department
50.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building" Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
]4
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. .
51. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
52. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
53. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees. '
54. Obtain al/ building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
55. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
56.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998)
.
57. Second set of disabled parking Places shall be relocated to the southwest side of the
building.
58. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
59. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
60. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
61. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
62. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schernatic and mechanical plan for plan review.
63. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
64.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
.
G:\PI::mning\2005\PAOS-OIOO Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
15
.
.
.
65.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
66.
Show all building setbacks on plot plan.
67.
I
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-25, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter r:nile of an occupied residence.
,
Mond$y-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No wdrk is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
I
I
Public Works
68.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department at Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed: I
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
69.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approach,
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
70. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
72. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation: Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Fire Department
73.
Prior to building cohstruction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\PI:1l111ing\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
'6
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather .
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
74. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC see 902)
75. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
76. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
(CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99,14)
77. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
78. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
79.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
.
.
G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-OIOO Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
. 17
.
.
.
PRIOR TO BUILDING OCCUPANCY
G:\PlJnning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison L.ot ] 3-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.uoc
18
I'
i
.
v
.
.
Planning Department
The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning
Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permi!.
81. Prior to building occupancy, all site improvements including but not limited to parking
areas and striping shall be installed.
I
80.
,
,
82. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this perri!.
Public Works I
83. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance frbm the following agencies:
I
a. Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department10f Public Works
I
84. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to t~e satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
b.
c.
:
85. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
Community Services
86. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
88.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters ijndJor numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as appro~ed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
1
I
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
, ,
,
89.
G:\Pl:lnning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
19
90.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
.
91. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4)
92. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
93. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
94. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
95.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for Obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
.
96. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information.
The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and
projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau
must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of
this condition.
97. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
98.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot 13-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
~ 20
.
.
.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name I
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0100 Madison Lot I3-DP\Pbnning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
2]
.
ITEM #7
.
.
.
.
.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
,
I
Date of Meeting: July 20, 2005
Prepared by: Christinel Damko Title: Associate Planner
File Number: PA05"01b1 Application Type: Development Plan
Project Description: ~ Development Plan to construct a two-story office! show room
b~ilding totaling 23,618 square feet located at the end of the cul-
I '
de-sac of Madison Avenue, west of the 15 freeway (APN:910-282-
,
012).
I
~ Approve with Conditions
I
OJ Deny
I
OJ Continue for Redesign
I
OJ Continue to:
I
I
OJ Recommend Approval with Conditions
I
OJ Recommend Denial
I
~ Categorically Exempt
I
OJ Negative Declaration
I
OJ Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
(Class)
15332
,
[[] EIR
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-OIOI Madison 0t 6-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template_doc
I I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Peter Minegar
Completion Date:
April 6, 2005
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
July 20, 2005
General Plan Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Zoning Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant lot
Vacant lot
Existing drainage channel and existing Service Commercial buildings
Existing Service Commercial buildings
Existing Service Commercial buildings
Lot Area:
1 .4 acres
Building Summary:
Proposed 23,618 square foot building
Building Height:
36 feet 6 inches
.
Total Floor Area/Ratio: .38
"Landscape Area/Coverage: 14,157 square feet / 23%
Parking Required/Provided: 80 required / 80 provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[2:] 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
. and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
A Pre-Application was submitted on January 3, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 10,
2005 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture, and other departmental issues. On April 6, 2005,
a formal Development Plan application was submitted. On May 12, 2005, a second DRC
meeting was held with the applicant. A DRC letter was rnailed on May 17, 2005 and the
applicant resubmitted on June 1, 2005.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-OIOl Madison Lot 6-DP\.Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template,doc
2
ANAL YSIS
. Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Service Commercial (SC) zoning
district. The building setb~cks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and
the 0.33 Floor Area Ratio is' below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district.
Architecture
.
.
The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines and is
compatible with other adjatent buildings within the vicinity. The building will be constructed of
concrete tilt-up painted a S,fnooth surface. The main entry into the building is accentuated by a
cylinder shaped design with a decorative cap. The cylinder shaped entry consists of glass for
,
further enhancement. Metal awnings extending out four feet from the building emphasize each
individual entry. A patio area located on the south side of the building will contain a trellis
structure that will be constructed of the same metal material as the awnings. All entries are
decorated with slate accen't material, which surrounds the metal awning. The building includes
various breaks in the wall planes such as two inch panel reveals. The building footprint includes
wall variations ranging frorr\ 11 feet to 28 feet. One foot pop-outs are provided at all entries. A
decorative metal parapet is!proposed to provide a final finish for the proposed building.
I
Landscapinq I
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree imd shrub placement will serve to effectively screen on site parking
areas and effectively soft~n building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 14,157
square feet or 23 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum landscaping requirements in
the SC (Service Commercial) zone. The project provides landscaping around the perimeter of
the site, with a 25 foot landscaped setback along Madison Avenue, and varied landscape
setbacks around the buildin'g footprints.
I
Access and Circulation I
I
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact for the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved City of Te'mecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed
the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency
services to the site. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated
to utilize the site, as well as, emergency vehicles. One loading space is provided along the south
side of the building, thereby meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the
Development Code. I
,
ENVIRONMENTAL DETE~MINATION
[8J 1. In accordance wit~ the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section
15332, In-Fill Development Projects.
G:\Plalllling\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template. doc
, 3
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached
conditions of approval.
.
FINDINGS
Development Plan(17.05.01 OF)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Service
Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan
has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light manufacturing
uses, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service Commercial designation.
The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined conditioned by the
Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building
and Fire Codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of .
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Service Commercial Development Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance
standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plan Reductions - Slue Page 5
2. PC Resolution No. 2005-_ - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
4
.
.
.
,
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT templalc.doc
5
,
~
o
o 0
tlI ~
o 0
g go
~-- ~~~
3~~ ~
ll\ "'..<<> ~
'" - '" ~t
~i?~ ~!~ ;~
tl:;~ "-~'" "'8
@:;; g~~ ~~g:o
.....-.... Q"t;; ",,~...,
~_~i~. ~[J;O:>l",~l7i~':sl
., T'
"I
~~
0< 8
~~ ~ ot
.. o'j <sg~",
~ -~~<.>Q~~;~~
~~<.> ~3~~d;;;"~3
lj~!f~ ~~bG8~b~
~~~~ <'>~~~~~b~~...
8sd ~~~2g~~n8
g"".....;: ;;'0"''''Z1
o
z
0,
"
u
~
· ~II ~~i !Ilm
..... -" 'H
'..... 0:, I'l;!
· 1'-:"11I : I .')l
i III1 i .'
~
o
.
o
z
g~a:
~
.
'" ~
J!I:~~
X~~~~~l;;~
"',. "'uz",",
~~~~~~~2
I
i
i
ii
Ii
~;~
t;~:;:'
~~~
a. ~~
::. 0-0 ~
i g~ ~ S '"
tl ag~~~...~ ~ ;53
"ii!~~ze:~~8.:;' ~g::
~g~~;5~w"~gt ~;~5
~"~o"'~<'>z~"'uo- ~"'~o
~~~U~~~~~~e i~""-
u
z
0,
~.
~
~
.t
!
,
Ii
~]]dJ snOndldJ8 ~lN~S
>
.
i!!!
!
r
~
/
I
,
!
;~
~
. I
! I
l--.J
I
I
I
I !
'r+l
r~!~il
[""
.TI
I
1m
I I tl! i;{1
! ~lgl
I~
-@
!ii~
"~,i
~$i~~
.
\
I
I
1!l~
f
\ i g~.
I I _ _ lI:9
I--.~<o"o 0_
\;fmm; i
~ ~~~ggo2:
~'d~
\
\
I
i
~tx~
~~~
~~
\,
\)
I
'0
~~
~t
o
V)
o
'T
~
r~
[pI
I ~ l?j
ITJ'~."I' l,
""
,
"~b
.
: "
,
~ ~
~~ ~
:;::~~;:~
~ ~~~!;
~ ~~~:;;g
ti .nii,
5 ::."'...~""
~
~~
,
~
lJ.J
<..')
<:
<:c
ct:
C)
~
'({~
0:
-'
g~
~~
co
I-
o
......J
f.r)
.....
(J
lJ.J
.....
6
~
Cl
~
CI)
~
-
1::
(J
ct:
<:c
,
! d, II
I ',I', - I
" I
! ~ l ~
I Hi I'
" .., i
I ~ I 1 I -
!:'i f f I.' ~
I ~ } f J I
'" ! l! ,
Ii ". !Il
Iii Ii H!
~ 00&:X:X':8
n <:
" a
;:: 0-
~
UJ
uj &--
~ f.-
er,
l!i
~
.
l
~!i,","f,
~, .~~
..._....1.-____(____1_--
~: rl~r
____~~i.~.1
~: :~~
. ~~;;~ . ;--:/ij]ffi!> -::
"~,' ' ,I,..
,...:" , ! ,_<;'1<':"".._
..., ~j-f~-'
~ ~~-
__._.'__. [,__...__I..___..n
~ ; [11]-
m_u~-il r~~'1
~ ;~
, i . , -
f , , I
8-ji
t:!
il
1-'
~
<:; 'i
I-I
"1
; I
Ii
i I
! ,
i1. ;-:~::::~::::i:::=~~'~~i
&--
G-
&--
EiiB', r;;p;rl
~il~
I ' :..
--r'-i-~i-~-
rn.m ! i ij@I
~i:~
i !.. - i "..
Ij] I [Iif
________;___-L__~
: i _ : _.
.~~~~~
lE1ill,,~_
, , ,
, '
Iil', I : ie'" -
~Q'" ",,< j
,;,,:t} , : 96::<;
~--~-i~~:
~ I LLq1ll__
--'-Ii1~:l"i-IIl'~' -
,'iJf.~l' , l/-'!',"i"
......." I "'.._
, -
i
13
;::
~
UJ
uj
f.-
[j
:;:
~ [~
111, i riW'--
R~ I ,-
_: i_
__----:......._+__ L__
III [1=1
! . I
---1----;--._-----;--
ijiI i r~.'
~I J.~L
~
.
.hl
~ f'"
}!!'
r',l
lBj
;~ ~ ":~l
",{af
11II1 J:II
"
0 .
f:
u
:::~ ~~
","'''
- " ~i
&:n
~ :i!8
~ ~i2 f3
~ ::!::;
!
~
~
<:
a
;::
~
UJ
uj
~
:::>
a
er,
.
13
;::
~
UJ
uj .. Lu
~ ,
~ ;;,~ ~
"
0: <:
g~
~~ q::
CO a::
I- a
a
-....J CI)
<: I-
a 0
CJ) Lu
- I-
Q
~ - .
:t:
CJ) 0
~ a::
q::
.
.
.
,-,'
)
i
~--....-.i._ -1__
/
!
~~
II
~~
~,
I"!
,!:
ni
~~
1!
"
r
\
,
,
,
1_1-
t-- I
\1 --
" I ~
"
~._--
, ~-
\ .o..to-----....
----\:..._---
, -
Jj':;,--
i!~
"
!
---~_____.l<
I
\ - i'-_ _0-." -+
~-
.._~:-'!7~""\---.:li:
_I" ,v" .'-: \.U,
... L"/. \'-. ,'< :.!II-~
,_',/n,," 'I" \
.!' :r,,";'S:li
~
1__1
_0---,>
iu
17. ~
I;:;:;
,
~i
I
!
.::",
,
;:
",co
..
?.i
:f~-
",.,
.~ -
"
!~
5~
"
,
"
"
'i
+,
I,
"
I"~
I',
\!
,
------.1-.'
I '
1 P
I ~~
~~~
I .,~
i i h~
: : r1f::
,--nli
i I I ..
I " IS~~
~..1,l!_l!'!
" ,1,' ,
. ::1I~~.:>'
~-if~--- @h~~
I
'I:
,;
!:
'-i---J-;7.' '
;:o.:~
,
i
-~--~
~~
' ~ II. ~j
.... --I
~4Il. ;;;1
i II~, :"1
<:
a
~
a
~
CI)
~
'~.
~ -
tij .,
5 '
" '
,
Z
0:
~
a.
0:
o
o
~
a.
....
'"
0:
u::
,
>
o
~~
~~-
~~
~
f-
a
-J
!m
lni!
li'I'
-',
J;n
~ ~}~i
e t, ~>
~il~
,
'" ~~~;;j
~ 5~j1;;;
~ ~~1~~
l ::;",,!'e::.
lJ.J
C!>
<:
'<l::
0:::
a
CI)
I--
()
lJ.J
I--
-
::t
()
0:::
'<l::
i
i:
t--l
i
,
i
;
I
---.;;':,i<--
--"----::0:--:;:.
--:0=:,.
h
>I
~7.
~';',,,,
---:0::-.<>
----~.-
-~~<Fi.
:0-,"
--------r--..',',-
---i--
~.:~
:"
-.'--,
~'I ~:l
...... ':: ~ 1
ll~, ~;!
,
,
;!!1
hI!
~~;g
I p.'
td
~Wi
9kW
. ~.
~ "'
M ~
.
--,,-----~
!
z
:5
~
0-
o
o
~
~
o
z
o
()
w
'"
'0
tJ~~ ;;;f
u:m
l
.
,
< lJ.J
,
~ ~
~~
'O~ ~
~~ <::(
c.
CO Cl::
I- a
0
-.J CI)
f-
<: <.J
0
CI) lJ.J
- f-
Q -- .
~ ::r::
CI) <.J
~ Cl::
<::(
I
I
I
I
.i
i
I
!
.
.
-0, ,n
-.,..
t,Q"-::t;
/t
';""",,"r: i
l.~_..
(IOOl~.M_R!1 ],;olS
if
:8 t
i;:i i
'... .
:.......--.
L~~m-
'\lC(l.JbJo.o.
,
~n
11!
~~ I
,
~/
/)
:;'3-1 .
l.~__.l
~~l
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
"
...~~
,
I
I
I
,
"
.,,, I
'~
,
~
"c
_____~"', .n
"c
~
~"'8!
'~':>" ;;i i
'\.L~...J
',~I-'-",'
lOOj~jd.g/l Jd01S )
I
, I
'I _...___
"1
~
.. "re-j
~iO i
'0 ,,.,,
~<;. ~--_.
~ \; 'T"
""<'1iJ
," ?/~ 3dOl'l >
100.. ~'y .
~
;....~---,
~~ i; !
,'" L..'
'"". '.
~l'''':Vi''
~
~~~
,
n_~_.
Ii
,
!
"
\"
,
is '"""
l",,'
,
~
,
, ,
b
.
;;
,
.:..--l-o-:r.i;'--:o--:>L-'---
~.
.--------~o'"~"
'-l
z
:'i
~
~
o
o
'"
,
o
~~'I ~jl filii
~ ~"'I ~lJlt
i IIii', . I .'1'1
z
o
>=
u
w
~
co
z
o
~
='
m
'~'
i :
. ,
o
,
io 1Z
u~ ~
~e~~:e
~ ~i~~;
~ ~~~;e
~ ~U;2
~
~ ltJ
,
,
~
n:~
o~ :<:
~~ "l:
"
<c ct
I- a
0 ;
-J CI) i
l- i
<: I
() !
0
Cf) ltJ
- I-
Cl
~ -
::t::
Cf) ()
~ ct
"l:
~~'PY1.NOQtII.L__lSI5ll(V,j___H./ cici
>>
~>r.I'Y'WIOiftli'3W;]telIB:)~-.a
NOSItJVfl ssn ......, c] 1;;"" 6=
z'
.
9 101 NOSKJVrl SSrl ,~ . u w <nO
~-5 r _0
~ o ~
Z
<( .
..J
n..
!Ii o !! Cl
" I, "I' z
~ ~ ~ :!,! I! I-
'" , Z
. " Iii! I , ~ , <(
~" l' 1" i ..J
ttttt: jli:ll,1 n..
a a a a a - >-
a. ~ ~ ~ ~ li~ie i!l Ii' a:
:; ~ , llll!l <(
~ . !"I' I z
II; e i'll' ::E
~ ~~5~ '1,I,j, :J
I nq iI::t::!2 ~ 0; ". W
a:
u ~ i 3 ~ n..
Iii
s~~~
. '
~ -
.
,
,
_,'."' __,,., _, o_,@
~...".._..,..g-....:rO;U"
:lNINNVld SJunO'f'J NQIIV]Il::!)1l
HOZ' ";""~I D'U'OJ!ID::!
3~~31IHO~V' ]dY.JSONVl
dnolJO VlJ8rl'l'Kl'l'
I
.
" 1
I I ,
,
. . !
, I i
[ s !
l !I! !H! I i
i , ,
i 111 1111 ! ,
,0
! "-" :l!Hl ~::l ., ~ " !
.
, ~ g $ ;;1 1111 I i
~ iI: ::! -.. -.."''''
1 1
i , I.. I
l I- 'I "" I
I ~ ~ Iii ~ ~ ~ ,
I HI! , !
'1' .L '0' j
I
, i ,Ih I
Iii I., ,
I ~ i IL~ I I
i III III I
III "II ! ,
,
~ -:., : " I
i,Io'I.11 ~ ~: ~ --! ..
! !!!.h! 11;l!dl
! 00, 00 0 f II
0 @ 0 e
.
~
!
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005,_
G:\Plannlng\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT template.doc
6
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF T'EMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05'0101, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
TWO STORY OFFICE/SHOW ROOM BUILDING TOTALING
23,618 SQUARE FEET LOCATED AT THE END OF MADISON
AVENUE, IWEST OF THE 15 FREEWAY, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 910-282-012.
WHEREAS, pe;erl Minegar filed Planning Application No. PA05-0101 (Develop~ent
Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code; I
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner pr~scribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Pllnning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on July 20, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter; I
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commis'sion approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings
set forth hereunder; I
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
I
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
I
Section 1. Thatl the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference. I
I
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17,05.010F of the T emecula Municipal
Code: '
I
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements: of state law and other ordinances ot the city.
The proposal is c6nsistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Service Commercial (SC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The
General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including discount retail stores, offices, light
manufacturing use's, and auto service and repair as typical uses in the Service
Commercial desig~ation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations
,
outlined and condi(ioned by the Building Department and Fire Prevention Bureau to
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes.
I
:
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
I
health, safety, and general1welfare.
I
G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-OIOI Madison Lbt 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
I
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project .
has been reviewed utilizing the Service Commercial Development Performance
Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance
standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance.. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt' pursuant to Section
15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct a two-story office/show room
building totaling 23,618 square feet located at the end oj the cul-de-sac oj Madison Avenue,
west of the 15 freeway with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that
may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP"FED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 20lh day of July 2005.
David Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
.
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of'Temecula at ~ regular meeting thereof held on the 20lh day of July 2005, by the
following vote of the comtssion:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
I
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
I
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
I
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-010J Madison Lol6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planniog\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
,
,
I
Planning Application No.:
Project DescriPtiot
I
,
P A05-01 01
A Development Plan to construct a two,story
service commercial building totaling 23,618
square feet located at the end of the cul,de,
sac of Madison Avenue, west of the 15
freeway (APN: 910,282,012)
DIF Category:
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
MSHCP Category: :
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
TUMF:
TBD at Building Permit Issuance (Speculative
Building)
910-282,012
Assessor's Parcel 'No.:
Approval Date:
July 20, 2005
July 20, 2007
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty,Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6.DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
5
.
.
.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 rvladison Lot 6.DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
6
.
.
.
Planning Department
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from )any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions !approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The qity shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its c,itizens in regards to such defense.
3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this development plan.
2.
4. This approval shall,be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
5.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
I
7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
8. All mechanical and root equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the surrounding parapet wall.
9. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
10. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all
utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines,
11.
If at any time d,uring excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
7
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance oj the aflected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at .
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department stafl, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
13. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
14. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
15.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by stafls prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City stafl determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the condition oj approval. Stafl may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
.
Material
Finish and Color
Main Body texture and color
Accent Color
Accent Color
Accents
Awnings
Frazee Paint #8711W "Misty Mica"
Frazee Paint #8713W "Kindling Wood"
Frazee Paint #8724W "Wildcat"
Slate Tile
Metal
16. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
Public Works
17. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
18.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
8
.
.
.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
19.
All grading plans s~all be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Community Services
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid wastelcontainers.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris! Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
20.
21.
22.
The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
23.
All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
property owner or rtJaintenance association.
Fire Department
'Final fire and life spfety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevenlion Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building ICode (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
I
I
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all tommerciaJ buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall proyide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2125 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow bf 2975 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during thd approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protettion measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given abo~e has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A) I .
The Fire preventio~ Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Tab!e A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public str~ets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department acces9 road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any: adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
I
,
As required by the :California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a, water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exteriorj of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flqw shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
I
,
If construction is ph:ased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building: construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
: '
G:\PJanning\200S\PA05-0101 Madison LOt 6-DP\Planning\PC I~ESOLUT10N AND COA.doc
. I ~ 9
.
.
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison L~)t 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
, ]0
.
.
.
37.
38.
Planning Departmenf
29.
I
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for ~erification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final kgreement with the utility companies.
I
The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, WhiChl meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impatt the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
I '
A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department. I
The applicant shall comply with the provIsions of Chapter 8.24 ot the Temecula
Municipal Code (H'abitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by pr6viding documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
30.
31.
32.
Public Works
A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculatibns shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservatio~ District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
I
A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-way.
I
A Grading Plan sh111 be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion ,control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property. I
36. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
,
33.
34.
35.
A Soil Report shall:be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
I
, ,
The Developer sha!l have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impact~ to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required irriprovements, shall be provided by the Developer.
,
I
I
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0l01 -Madison l{lt 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
II
39.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
a combination of structural and non-structural on site source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
40. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
41.
The Developer shall compiy with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
42. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area'
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
. G:\PJaoning\2005\PA05-0JOI Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05~OIOI Madison ~t 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
I 13
I
.
.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
43.
Planning Department
I
,
,
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscbpe plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, a~d container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items: I
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal). I
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areks. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
Provide an ~gronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
One (1) coJy of the approved grading plan.
Water usaJe calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost ~stimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
A landscap~ maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper Inaintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper grow1h
and landsckpe development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved niaintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor v:,ho shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
I
I
All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and
appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided
around fire check I detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
,
I
An appropriate me\hod tor screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be(eVieWed and approved by the Planning Department.
The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans.
I
The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International
Orange". I
provi~e a detail otI the metal trellis on the construction plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director. I
I
Provide a detail of the outside furniture proposed for the site on the construction plans to
the satistaction ot t~e Planning Director. .
I
I
I
All design componJnts shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building,! Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
Calitornia Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, Caljfornia Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
44.
Building Department
50.
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
- I - 14
!
51.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
.
52. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
53. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
54. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
55. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
56. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998)
57.
58.
59.
_0'.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
Second set of disabled parking Places shall be relocated to the southwest side of the
building.
.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures: patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
.
G:\Plannillg\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
15
.
.
.
71.
72.
66.
Show all building setbacks on plot plan.
Signage shall be Josted conspicuously at the. entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of constructibn, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-25, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter /nile of an occupied residence.
Mond1y-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
I
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. .
No wdrk is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
67.
Public Works
68.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Dir~ctor of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed: I
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
AC . I
. . paving.
b. Driveway s~all conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. All street an1d driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
The Developer shlll construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Stahdards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works. I
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: drive approach
b. Storm drainlfacilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
The building pad Jail be certified to have been substantially constructed In accordance
with the approved I Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issu~ a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
I
The Developer ShJII pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in ~ccordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
,
The Developer shkll pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation I Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
69.
70.
Fire Department
73. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporaiy Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed.! Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
I
I
I
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison 1ft 6-DP\Pfanning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
16 .
75.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC see 902)
76. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
77. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
(CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
78. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
79.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
G:\Ptanning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison LoI6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION ANI) COA_doc
17
.
.
.
.
.
.
PRIOR TO BUILDING OCCUPANCY
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot6-0P\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
. I'
I 18
I
I
.
I
Public Works i
80. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance fjom the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Mu1niciPal Water District
I
c. Department of Public Works
All public improven\ents shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing impro1vements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired pr removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
81.
82.
Community Services
83. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
,
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance df a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be1provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and I~gible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings' shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and m~lti-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approVed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
I
Prior to issuance 01 Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of constr0ction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprin~ler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
,
I
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
I
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation
(CFC Article 10) I .
Prior to the issuanqe of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right ~ide of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4)
I
I
i
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
19
84.
.
85.
86.
87.
88.
.
Fire Department
89.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
.
90. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
91. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be. designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
92. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate' of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
93.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
.
94. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall
submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information.
The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and
projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau
must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of
this condition.
95. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
96. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
.
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0101 Madison Lot G-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
20
.
.
.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
,
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
,
,
,
G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0l0J Madison Lot 6-DP\Planning\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
21