Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
02112025 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY 11, 2025 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — INITIATION OF LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the potential acquisition of a fee interest in that certain real property, which is a 6 acre vacant parcel located on Business Park Drive southerly of Rancho Way the in the City of Temecula identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Number 921-020-067 (Property). The Property is listed for sale on the open market. Negotiators for the City are Aaron Adams, Kevin Hawkins and Luke Watson. The negotiators for the Property are the property owners Stephen and Tula Carvadias Trust represented by Michal Pappas of Kidder Matthews. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of the Property. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Brenden Kalfus INVOCATION: TBD FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Brenden Kalfus ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation from Casey Elliott, Vice President of Townsend Public Affairs (State Lobbyist) BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission and Traffic Safety Commission Page 1 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Fire Department (CAL FIRE) PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images maybe displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of January 28, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of January 28, 2025. Attachments: Action Minutes 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Page 2 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 4. 5. 6. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands Approve City Treasurer's Report for the Periods of November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 and December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for the periods of November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 and December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. Attachments: Agenda Report November - City Treasurer's Report December - City Treasurer's Report Approve Increase of Excess Liability Insurance Policy with Arch Specialty and Acceptance Casualty Insurance Companies Recommendation: That the City Council approve the increase of the City's excess liability insurance policy and additional premiums: 1. Excess Liability ($5M excess of $15M Limit) insurance with Arch Specialty Insurance Company, in the prorated amount of $67,843.95, for the period of February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025; and 2. Excess Liability ($5M excess of $20M Limit) insurance with Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company, in the prorated amount of $44,085.72 for the period of February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025. Attachments: Agenda Report Excess Liability Proposal Approve Agreement with Willdan Engineering for the Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project, PW23-04 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve a consultant agreement with Willdan Engineering in the amount of $290,034, for the Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project, PW23-04; and Page 3 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 7. 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,003.40, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Project Description Project Location Approve Agreement with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. for the Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project, PW22-05 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the agreement for consultant services with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. for the Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project, PW22-05, in the amount of $673,843; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $67,384.30, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Project Description Project Location RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 4 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 8. Approve Action Minutes of January 28, 2025 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of January 28, 2025. Attachments: Action Minutes 9. Approve Sponsorship Agreement and First Amendment for Various Nonprofits for Use of CitX Facilities Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve sponsorship agreement and first amendment for the following nonprofits for use of City facilities: 1. Temecula Valley Genealogical Society - Agreement - $8,272/1-year 2. Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club - First Amendment - $1,440/ 1-year Page 5 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement - Temecula Valley Genealogical SocietX First Amendment - Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, February 25, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 6 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT - CONSENT CALENDAR 10. Approve Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid -Year Budgetjustments Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2025-29 AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS Attachments: Agenda Report FY 2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Resolution - City Exhibit A, B, C and D - City Fund Summaries and Schedule of Authorized Positions Resolution - CIP Exhibit 1 - CIP Mid -Year Requests Resolution - Salary Schedule Salary Schedule Resolution - TCSD Exhibit A - TCSD Fund Summaries Page 7 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be included into the record. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 11. Introduce Ordinance Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Off -Site Wit. fig Signs Within the Temecula Auto Mall Recommendation: That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.28.290 OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF -SITE WAYFINDING SIGNS IN THE AUTO MALL, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) Page 8 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 12. 13. Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance PC Resolution No. 2025-01 Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption Consider Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Long Range Project No. LR23-0494) Recommendation That the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve a fourth amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Long Range Project No. LR23-0494) and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR23-0494) Attachments: Agenda Report Aerial Map Resolution Exhibit A - Amendment No. 4 PC Resolution No. 2024-25 Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing Approve Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF.) Program Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THIS RESOLUTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A - TUMF Nexus Study 2024 Update Notice of Public Hearing Page 9 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 14. Introduce Ordinance Amending the Western Riverside Coun . Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program to Update Participation Recommendation: That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, TO UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance Notice of Public Hearing BUSINESS Any member of the public may address the City Council on items that appear on the Business portion of the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk. Speaker cards will be called in the order received. Still images may be displayed on the projector. All other audio and visual use is prohibited. Public comments may also be submitted by email for inclusion into the record. Email comments must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments and submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. All public participation is governed by Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 15. Consider Topic of Proposed Safety and Security Plan Measures at City Hall and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same (At the Request of Council Member Schwank) Recommendation: That the City Council consider the topic of proposed safety and security plan measures at City Hall and provide general direction regarding the same. Attachments: Agenda Report City Hall Safety Plan ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy Page 10 City Council Agenda February 11, 2025 or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, February 25, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 11 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. In accordance with Government Code Section 34934, the title of each ordinance is included on the published agenda and a copy of the full ordinance has been available to the public online on the City's website and will be available in print at the meeting prior to the introduction or passage of the ordinance. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 28, 2025 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Mayor Brenden Kalfus INVOCATION: Bishop Terrence Hundley of The Place City of Miracles FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Brenden Kalfus ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS Presentation of Years of Service Pin to Peter Thorson (35 years) BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT County of Riverside, Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Laurel LaMont • Margaret Meyncke • James Phillips • Gabriella Pleasant • Samantha McGraw CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. Waive Reading of Title and Text of All Ordinances and Resolutions Included in the Agenda Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the title and text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Approve Action Minutes of January 14, 2025 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of January 14, 2025. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Approve Annual Legislative Platform for Calendar Year 2025 With Addition of Insurance Provision (At the Request of Council Member Schwank) Recommendation: That the City Council approve the annual legislative platform for calendar year 2025 with the addition of an insurance provision. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. Approve U.S. House of Representatives District Office Lease Amendment at the Temecula Civic Center Recommendation: That the City Council approve U.S. House of Representatives District Office Lease Amendment at the Temecula Civic Center in substantially the form as attached. Approve Purchase and Installation Agreement with Helixstorm, Inc. for Replacement of Technology Infrastructure at Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Purchase and Installation Agreement with Helixstorm, Inc. in the amount of $154,969.14 for the lifecycle replacement of technology infrastructure that supports patron computers at the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library; and 2. Approve contingency in the amount of $15,496 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount, for a total contract amount of $170,465.14. Approve General Plan Update Managing Consultant Agreement with Sagecrest Planning and Environmental (Long Range Project No. LR24-0462) Recommendation: That the City Council approve an agreement with Sagecrest Planning and Environmental in the amount of $544,808 to manage the General Plan Update through June 30, 2027. 8. Approve Maintenance Services Agreement with Tony Painting for Annual Painting Maintenance Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the maintenance services agreement with Tony Painting for annual painting maintenance services for fiscal year 2024-25 through 2029-30, in the amount of $200,000 per fiscal year, for a total agreement amount of $1,000,000. 9. Establish All-Waop Control at the Intersection of La Serena Way and Calle Medusa Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2025-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ESTABLISHING AN ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA SERENA WAY AND CALLE MEDUSA AND FINDING THAT THE ACTION IS EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) UNDER SECTION 15301(C) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES RECESS: At 7:10 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District, Successor Agency the Redevelopment Agency meetings. At 7:13 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 12. Adopt Public Nuisance Abatement Special Assessment Resolution for Certain Parcels Located West of Mercedes Street and South of Third Street for the Period of June 16, 2024 to December 13, 2024 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2024-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS FOR THE PERIOD OF JUNE 16, 2024 TO DECEMBER 13, 2024 FOR THE FOLLOWING PARCELS LOCATED WEST OF MERCEDES STREET AND SOUTH OF THIRD STREET: 922-043-002; 922-043-003; 922-043-004; 922-043-010; 922-043-015; 922-043-016; 922-043-018; 922-043-023; 922-043-024; AND 922-043-025 Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 3 RININFIRS 13. Receive Report Regarding Annual Board, Committee, and Commission Recruitment and Selection Process and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same Recommendation: That the City Council receive a report regarding the annual board, committee, and commission recruitment and selection process and provide general direction regarding the same. Discussion and general direction provided regarding the same. 14. Receive Report Regarding Annual Board, Committee and Commission Joint Meetings and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same Recommendation: That the City Council receive a report regarding the annual board, committee and commission joint meetings and provide general direction regarding the same. Discussion and general direction provided regarding the same. 15. Receive Report Regarding Youth In Government Program and Provide General Direction Regar ing_the Same (At the Request of Mayor Kalfus) Recommendation: That the City Council receive a report regarding the youth in government program and provide general direction regarding the same. Discussion and general direction provided regarding the same. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (RECEIVE AND FILE) 16. Community Development Department Monthly Report 17. Fire Department Monthly Report 18. Police Department Monthly Report 19. Public Works Department Monthly Report ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS The City Council approved the placement of the following topics on a future agenda: 1. Board, Committees and Commission Review and Potential Consolidation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Kalf is. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 2. Senior Master Plan Update (5-0): Motion by Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 8:47 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at 5:00 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Tricia Hawk, Finance Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $6,403,326.26. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 1 lth day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the I Ph day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 01/11/2025 - 01/24/2025 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 5,628,386.93 01/16/2025 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 774,939.33 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 2/11/2025 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 6,403,326.26 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 604998 1/16/2025 3997 A STEP IN THE RIGHT 241277368EL ADA AIDE ASSISTANCE: CONTRACT CLASSES: TCSD EFT Posted 325.00 17820 12/3/2024 3489 ACE PARKING PC111824 PARKING: STAFF TRAINING P Card 15.00 17820 12/3/2024 200 ACTION APPLIANCE PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE: PW P Card 52.20 303693 1/23/2025 1772 ADAME LANDSCAPE INC S25421 PARKING GARAGE SWEEPING/CLEANING: PW Printed Check 540.00 604999 1/16/2025 1110 AETNA RESOURCES FOR E0334485 EAP BENEFITS: HR EFT Posted 1,526.35 303694 1/23/2025 1206 AFLAC PREMIUM HOLDIN Ben350680 AFLAC ACCIDENT INDEMNITY PAYMENT Printed Check 3,088.03 303695 1/23/2025 1236 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1209441 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 613.24 605093 1/23/2025 1512 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENT 27993 PIANO SERVICES: THEATER: TCSD EFT Posted 600.00 605000 1/16/2025 1609 ALLIED TRAFFIC AND E 94985 EQUIPMENT RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 690.00 605094 1/23/2025 1609 ALLIED TRAFFIC AND E 94986 EQUIPMENT RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,925.00 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 OFFICE SUPPLIES P Card 31.50 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 OFFICE SUPPLIES P Card 127.27 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 PROFESSIONAL MEETINGS: ITSS P Card 113.25 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 826.40 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: ITSS P Card 29.05 17820 12/3/2024 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI PC111824 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: ITSS P Card 768.90 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1LLC-WQWJ-1QGW BOOKS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 28.58 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1HJJ-J7FN-QJH4 BOOKS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 516.43 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1YPJ-37KW-V6K7 BOOKS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 549.30 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1NWN-44NX-4PPD MISC SUPPLIES: MPSC & MRC SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 18.04 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1PXN-MMNM-31HC MISC SUPPLIES: MPSC & MRC SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 34.76 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 16LF-P963-HYKQ MISC SUPPLIES: MPSC & MRC SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 430.89 605001 1/16/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 14KK-QYXF-HHMD MISC SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 150.50 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1NXR-WIWX-TCHL BOOKS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD EFT Posted 156.98 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1VL7-PM7Y-4VC6 ENGINE WASHING AND DETAIL SUPPLIES: FIRE STATIONS EFT Posted 588.89 605096 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 17LD-RNiD-TRHR MISC SUPPLIES: FINANCE EFT Posted 8.56 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1 FV6-3THY-7L9W MISC SUPPLIES: FINANCE EFT Posted 33.32 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1 W7W-17VM-MM9C MISC SUPPLIES: FINANCE EFT Posted 71.12 605096 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1M7H-DFR6-YW9V MISC SUPPLIES: HR EFT Posted 6.51 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1R4J-QFGR-T9FV MISC SUPPLIES: HR EFT Posted 13.93 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 174J-YCLW-169J MISC SUPPLIES: HR EFT Posted 30.31 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1NFW-KKPK-3RD1 MISC SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 447.21 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 11XN-CRFR-NQMN OFFICE SUPPLIES: PLANNING EFT Posted 140.29 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1HJW-VPLX-V7N9 OFFICE SUPPLIES: SUPPRESSION: FIRE EFT Posted 988.21 605095 1/23/2025 1418 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVI 1J4X-H1VT-13J7 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: PREVENTION: FIRE EFT Posted 172.04 605002 1/16/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NU 79175 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 953.39 605002 1/16/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NU 79159 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 1,549.79 605002 1/16/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NU 79156 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 781.12 605002 1/16/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NU 79142 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 1,605.50 605097 1/23/2025 1261 AMERICAN FORENSIC NU 79230 DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 202.95 303648 1/16/2025 4129 AMERICAN NATIONAL RE 39761 BARBERRY CT RENTAL ASSISTANCE: TCSD Printed Check 2,170.00 605098 1/23/2025 1080 AMERICAN NATIONAL RE 22751677 STAFF CERTIFICATIONS: AQUATICS: TCSD EFT Posted 855.50 17635 12/9/2024 2813 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF 7917 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: RISK Credit Card 255.00 17757 1/7/2025 1766 APPLE.COM 6703 ADD'L APP: CAPCUT: SOCIAL MEDIA: ECON DEV Credit Card 9.99 17758 1/7/2025 1766 APPLE.COM 2105 ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: SOCIAL MEDIA: ECON Credit Card 9.99 605003 1/16/2025 1000 APPLEONE INC S9988979 TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES: CITY CLERK EFT Posted 2,948.40 605003 1/16/2025 1000 APPLEONE INC S10014007 TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES: CITY CLERK EFT Posted 3,538.08 605099 1/23/2025 1000 APPLEONE INC S9988978 TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES: FIRE EFT Posted 2,006.90 605099 1/23/2025 1000 APPLEONE INC S10014006 TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVICES: FIRE EFT Posted 2,465.62 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080651 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: CIVIC CTR EFT Posted 196.75 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080679 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: CRC AQUATICS EFT Posted 64.00 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080670 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: HARVESTON PARK EFT Posted 28.28 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080621 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: ITSS EFT Posted 28.28 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080656 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: JRC EFT Posted 28.55 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080665 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: MARGARITA PARK EFT Posted 96.52 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080671 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: MPSC EFT Posted 35.89 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080678 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: SPORTS PARK: PW EFT Posted 69.60 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080626 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 57.50 605004 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080622 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 57.50 605005 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080655 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: TPL: PW EFT Posted 26.25 605005 1/16/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080654 DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: TVM: PW EFT Posted 26.25 605100 1/23/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080653c DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: CIP: PW EFT Posted 9.00 605100 1/23/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080653a DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: LAND DEV: PW EFT Posted 9.00 605100 1/23/2025 1805 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DI 20080653b DRINKING WATER SYSTEM MAINT: TRAFFIC EFT Posted 9.00 605006 1/16/2025 3803 ARAGON GEOTECHNICAL 9154 CONSULTANT SERVICES: OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE PW17-1 EFT Posted 5,950.50 605007 1/16/2025 2777 ARAMARK SERVICES INC 2613479 REFRESHMENT SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 91.24 605007 1/16/2025 2777 ARAMARK SERVICES INC 11208814 REFRESHMENT SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 116.56 17774 1/7/2025 3551 ARMA INTERNATIONAL 7898 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: CITY CLERK Credit Card 175.00 605101 1/23/2025 1107 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CSF Grant Prgm'25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING GRANT PROGRAM: COMSP EFT Posted 5,000.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 17644 12/9/2024 4105 ASSP CHAPTER SERVICE 7470 REGISTRATION: TRAINING: RISK Credit Card 20.00 303696 1/23/2025 1035 AUDITOR CONTROLLER DEC'24 DEC'24 PARKING CITATION ASSESSMENTS Printed Check 3,982.50 303696 1/23/2025 1035 AUDITOR CONTROLLER NOV'24 NOV '24 PARKING CITATION ASSESSMENTS Printed Check 4,187.50 303696 1/23/2025 1035 AUDITOR CONTROLLER OCT'24 OCT'24 PARKING CITATION ASSESSMENTS Printed Check 4,343.00 605008 1/16/2025 2381 AYERS WILLIAM BRIAN 3056 ELECTRICAL SERVICES: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 800.00 605008 1/16/2025 2381 AYERS WILLIAM BRIAN 3057 ELECTRICAL SERVICES: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 400.00 605008 1/16/2025 2381 AYERS WILLIAM BRIAN 3053 ELECTRICAL SERVICES: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 500.00 605008 1/16/2025 2381 AYERS WILLIAM BRIAN 3055 ELECTRICAL SERVICES: OLD TOWN: PW EFT Posted 200.00 605102 1/23/2025 2381 AYERS WILLIAM BRIAN 3058 ELECTRICAL SERVICES: ICE RINK: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785222 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 11.41 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785224 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 11.42 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785223 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 14.27 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785226 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 37.68 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785225 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 40.26 303697 1/23/2025 1669 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC 2038785227 BOOK COLLECTIONS: RONALD H ROBERTS LIBRARY: TCSD Printed Check 140.32 303649 1/16/2025 1909 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRO 12915 APPAREL: TCSD COMMISSIONER Printed Check 150.08 303649 1/16/2025 1909 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRO 12916 EMBROIDERY: CODE ENFORCEMENT: COMM DEV Printed Check 65.25 303698 1/23/2025 1909 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRO CM-12881 MISC SUPPLIES: HR Printed Check (69.60) 303698 1/23/2025 1909 BAMM PROMOTIONAL PRO 12908 STAFF UNIFORMS: COMM DEV Printed Check 2,050.79 605009 1/16/2025 1810 BARCODES ACQUISITION INV7457226 PROXIMITY CARD SUPPLIES: ITSS EFT Posted 1,774.08 303699 1/23/2025 2224 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 28592501091421 TRAFFIC EQUIP BATTERIES: PW Printed Check 2,480.12 303699 1/23/2025 2224 BATTERY SYSTEMS INC 28592501140850 TRAFFIC EQUIP BATTERIES: PW Printed Check 15,294.05 605103 1/23/2025 3421 BEADOR CONSTRUCTION PW19-04 Inv 06 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK TRAIL PHASE II EFT Posted 238,634.95 17820 12/3/2024 1917 BEISTLE COMPANY THE PC111824 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENT: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 1,696.50 605104 1/23/2025 1980 BGP RECREATION INC 4005-4010.101-1st INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 4,183.20 17775 1/7/2025 1524 BJS RESTAURANTS INC 8935 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL MTG: CC Credit Card 310.01 605010 1/16/2025 1101 BLUETRITON BRANDS IN 14L0028662112 WATER DELIVERY SERVICES: PW EFT Posted 40.71 605010 1/16/2025 1101 BLUETRITON BRANDS IN O5A6702622575 WATER DELIVERY: INCUBATOR: COMSP EFT Posted 21.74 605105 1/23/2025 1101 BLUETRITON BRANDS IN 15A0028910578 WATER DELIVERY SERVICES: PW EFT Posted 349.64 605011 1/16/2025 2047 BOB CALLAHANS POOL S 0207 POOL AND FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 1,200.00 605011 1/16/2025 2047 BOB CALLAHANS POOL S 0208 POOL AND FOUNTAIN MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 2,000.00 17793 1/7/2025 2743 BOOT BARN 9361 UNIFORMS: STAFF: TCSD Credit Card 160.92 605106 1/23/2025 3720 BOOT WORLD INC 104752 SAFETY FOOTWEAR: RISK MANAGEMENT EFT Posted 169.07 303650 1/16/2025 3182 BRAGG INVESTMENT 259062 CRANE RENTAL: NYE EVENT: TCSD Printed Check 8,825.10 605012 1/16/2025 2415 BRAUN PETER 4882 PLANT MAINTENANCE: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 200.00 605012 1/16/2025 2415 BRAUN PETER 4906 PLANT MAINTENANCE: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 500.00 605107 1/23/2025 3968 BRAX COMPANY INC 56454 POOL PUMP: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 8,547.85 605013 1/16/2025 2622 BROWN JAMAL DEON 2345.101-2360.101 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS EFT Posted 1,127.00 303700 1/23/2025 1084 C R AND R INC 001542934 CONTAINER SERVICES: SANTIAGO LOT: PW Printed Check 879.03 303651 1/16/2025 3157 CAHALAN JASON 4201 BAY DOOR MAINTENANCE: FIRE STATIONS Printed Check 268.94 303651 1/16/2025 3157 CAHALAN JASON 4206 BAY DOOR MAINTENANCE: FIRE STATIONS Printed Check 538.80 303701 1/23/2025 3157 CAHALAN JASON 4191 DOOR WORK: CIVIC CENTER: SHERIFF SUBSTATION Printed Check 360.00 303702 1/23/2025 1190 CAL MAT 2547843 ASPHALT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW Printed Check 561.95 303652 1/16/2025 1342 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE 200032453 MEMBERSHIP REGISTRATION: CODE ENFORCEMENT Printed Check 210.00 17738 1/2/2025 1573 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD Ben350704 SUPPORT PAYMENT Wire 138.92 303653 1/16/2025 1612 CALIF DEPT OF INDUST E 2125981 SB 115265 ELEVATOR INSP: 28314 MERCEDES ST Printed Check 225.00 17783 1/7/2025 3328 CALIFORNIA CITY MANA 9073 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: PLANNING Credit Card 90.00 17820 12/3/2024 200 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 3,303.57 17820 12/3/2024 200 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY PC111824 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT P Card 471.44 303654 1/16/2025 1332 CANON FINANCIAL SERV 37333513 9 CANON COPIERS LEASE:TEM PUB LIBRARY: ITSS Printed Check 736.77 17813 1/7/2025 2244 CANVA.COM 0212 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: HR Credit Card 119.40 17750 1/7/2025 4125 CASA JIMENEZ 8433 REFRESHMENTS: CAPTAIN'S MEETING: FIRE Credit Card 41.25 303655 1/16/2025 2063 CASC ENGINEERING AND 0051428 ENGINEERING SERVICES: NPDES: PW Printed Check 82.50 303655 1/16/2025 2063 CASC ENGINEERING AND 0052135 ENGINEERING SERVICES: NPDES: PW Printed Check 1,242.50 303655 1/16/2025 2063 CASC ENGINEERING AND 0052302 ENGINEERING SERVICES: NPDES: PW Printed Check 975.00 303703 1/23/2025 2063 CASC ENGINEERING AND 0052714 ENGINEERING SERVICES: NPDES: PW Printed Check 3,671.00 605108 1/23/2025 1280 CDW LLC AC2122S MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: ITSS EFT Posted 113.35 605108 1/23/2025 1280 CDW LLC AC2KN3D MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: ITSS EFT Posted 578.55 605109 1/23/2025 1100 CES HOLDINGS LLC 244485 POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW EFT Posted 30.25 605109 1/23/2025 1100 CES HOLDINGS LLC 247097 POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW EFT Posted 120.09 605109 1/23/2025 1100 CES HOLDINGS LLC 248981 POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW EFT Posted 175.14 605109 1/23/2025 1100 CES HOLDINGS LLC 244650 POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW EFT Posted 1,284.65 605109 1/23/2025 1100 CES HOLDINGS LLC 252006 POOL TEST KIT CALIBRATION: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 105.36 17646 12/9/2024 3673 CHEESECAKE FACTORY 4353 REFRESHMENTS: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 136.97 303656 1/16/2025 3627 CHLOE AND MAUD PROD Ck Adv: 01/14/25 SYNCOPATED LADIES PERFORMANCE: TCSD Printed Check 15,500.00 605014 1/16/2025 3644 CHOMPFF DAVID 12/16/24 CULTURAL DAY PERFORMANCE: TCSD EFT Posted 1,850.00 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209555 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 58.69 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209553 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 63.45 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209552 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 90.64 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209551 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 111.10 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209554 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 115.94 303704 1/23/2025 1347 CINTAS CORPORATION 8407209556 FIRST AID SERVICES: RISK MANAGEMENT Printed Check 209.67 303657 1/16/2025 1701 CLEAR IMAGE ENTERPRI 19142 PRESSURE WASHING PARKING GARAGE: PW Printed Check 11,995.00 605110 1/23/2025 3998 CLIENTFIRST CONSULTI 17663 FINANCIAL SOFTWARE UPGRADE: HR/PAYROLL: FINANCE EFT Posted 4,975.00 605015 1/16/2025 3043 COMMERCIAL CLEANING 11601 JANITORIAL SERVICES: MALL & OTSF: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 833.33 605111 1/23/2025 3060 COMPLETE OFFICE LLC 4201140-0 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCEMENT EFT Posted 69.42 605112 1/23/2025 1046 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTE 122049 ALARM MONITORING SERVICES: CITY FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 6,585.00 605113 1/23/2025 3692 COPE VALERIE ROSE 01/14/25 STUDENT LEAD MUSICAL THEATER INTERNSHIP EFT Posted 1,100.00 605016 1/16/2025 3130 CORTEZ GASTELUM MARI 241221 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION: MPSC TCC: TCSD EFT Posted 118.75 605016 1/16/2025 3130 CORTEZ GASTELUM MARI 241123 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION: MPSC TCC: TCSD EFT Posted 125.00 303658 1/16/2025 1849 COSTAR REALTY INFORM 121655842 JAN'25 WEB SUBSCRIPTION: ECO DEV Printed Check 1,354.32 17820 12/3/2024 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: HIGH HOPES: TCSD P Card (37.81) 17820 12/3/2024 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: HIGH HOPES: TCSD P Card 71.92 17820 12/3/2024 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: HIGH HOPES: TCSD P Card 592.02 17820 12/3/2024 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: SPECIAL EVENT: TCSD P Card 167.88 17820 12/3/2024 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: TP PRESENTS: THEATER: TCSD P Card 300.29 17819 1/7/2025 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 6829 REFRESHMENTS: EOQ Credit Card 552.91 17756 1/7/2025 1098 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 5002 SUPPLIES: PECHANGA PU'ESKA EVENT: CC Credit Card 113.04 17696 12/9/2024 1972 CPS HR CONSULTING 0770 CLASSIFICATION SERVICES: HR Credit Card (310.00) 17812 1/7/2025 1972 CPS HR CONSULTING 6002 REGISTRATION: HR ACADEMY TRAINING Credit Card 650.00 303705 1/23/2025 1972 CPS HR CONSULTING 0015301 CLASSIFICATION STUDY SERVICES: HR Printed Check 165.00 605017 1/16/2025 3617 CRAFCO INC 9403246735 EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 48.51 605114 1/23/2025 1592 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & L30678 PORCH REPAIR: CHILDRENS MUSEUM: PW EFT Posted 9,260.00 605115 1/23/2025 1663 CRIME SCENE STERI CL 629 BIOHAZARDOUS WASTE CLEANUP: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 900.00 17637 12/9/2024 3026 CRUMBL 3607 REFRESHMENTS: STAFF MEETING: HR' RISK Credit Card 34.24 605116 1/23/2025 1195 DAISYECO INC 4076770 PRINTER AND PLOTTER SUPPLIES: ITSS EFT Posted 2,702.66 17636 12/9/2024 4041 DALE CARNEGIE 0252 REGISTRATION: TRAINING: RISK Credit Card 399.00 17633 12/9/2024 4041 DALE CARNEGIE 5460 REGISTRATION: TRAINING: RISK Credit Card 1,995.00 303659 1/16/2025 3209 DATA PROCESSING DESI EGOLD-12096947 CLOUD FAXING SERVICE: ITSS Printed Check 75.99 605018 1/16/2025 1105 DATA TICKET INC 172885 CITATION PROCESSING SERVICES NOV 2024: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 200.00 605018 1/16/2025 1105 DATA TICKET INC 173353 CITATION PROCESSING SERVICES NOV 2024: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 869.90 303660 1/16/2025 1491 DEPT OF GENERAL SERV 0000001608185 OAH SERVICES: CODE ENFORCEMENT Printed Check 8,690.00 303660 1/16/2025 1491 DEPT OF GENERAL SERV 0000001606987 OAH SERVICES: CODE ENFORCEMENT Printed Check 15,057.75 605019 1/16/2025 2227 DG INVESTMENT INTERM IN00283950 MAINT & REPAIR: SECURITY SYSTEM: ITSS EFT Posted 1,260.00 605019 1/16/2025 2227 DG INVESTMENT INTERIM IN00285642 SECURITY SYSTEM: STAMPEDE PARKING: PW15-07 EFT Posted 61,899.01 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005912207 ANNUAL PORTABLE RESTROOMS SERVICES: PW PARKS EFT Posted 160.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005696779 Bal Due FENCE RENTAL: JRC: PW EFT Posted 190.00 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005831172 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: HARMONY LANE EFT Posted 165.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005922887 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: HARMONY LANE EFT Posted 165.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005831169 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: LA SERENA WAY EFT Posted 110.88 605021 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005922884 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: LA SERENA WAY EFT Posted 110.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005831171 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: N GENERAL KEARNY RD EFT Posted 110.88 605021 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005922886 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: N GENERAL KEARNY RD EFT Posted 110.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005838220 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: N GENERAL KEARNY RD EFT Posted 220.00 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005831170 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: RIVERTON UN EFT Posted 110.88 605021 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005922885 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: RIVERTON LN EFT Posted 110.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005853940 PORTABLE RESTROOMS: STEPHEN LINEN PARK EFT Posted 160.88 605020 1/16/2025 1235 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTA 0005689749 Revised TEMPORARY FENCE: LONG CANYON CREEK PARK: PW EFT Posted 1,953.07 605022 1/16/2025 2137 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCA 10007349 DEC WATER QUALITY MAINT: DUCK POND/HARV EFT Posted 8,190.00 17820 12/3/2024 3075 DOORDASH PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: TP PRESENTS: THEATER: TCSD P Card 165.16 17820 12/3/2024 3075 DOORDASH PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: TP PRESENTS: THEATER: TCSD P Card 180.60 17766 1/7/2025 3075 DOORDASH 2O98 REFRESHMENTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER Credit Card 117.76 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72845 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT: PW EFT Posted 944.20 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL71502 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK MAINT: PW EFT Posted 1,694.81 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72847 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEPT EFT Posted 25.01 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL71504 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEPT EFT Posted 39.61 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72850 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 565.29 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL71508 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 1,662.79 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72863 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD EFT Posted 116.60 605023 1/16/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL71519 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PW EFT Posted 178.10 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72849 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPECTORS EFT Posted 90.51 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL71506 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPECTORS EFT Posted 253.18 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL72848 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFORCEMENT EFT Posted 117.93 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL70835 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT EFT Posted 122.04 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL74171 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 1,879.33 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL74172 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE EFT Posted 63.33 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL74176 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 1,570.84 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL74188 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD EFT Posted 84.75 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 605117 1/23/2025 1254 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL CL74187 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PW EFT Posted 89.44 605024 1/16/2025 3995 DRONE STUDIOS 1882 DRONE LIGHT SHOW: TCSD EFT Posted 9,000.00 303661 1/16/2025 2689 DS SERVICES OF AMERI 22116432 011025 WATER DELIVERY SERVICES: CITY COUNCIL: COMSP Printed Check 75.13 605025 1/16/2025 1678 DUDEK 202410529 CITYWIDE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN EFT Posted 4,793.88 17820 12/3/2024 3362 DUNN EDWARDS CORP PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 88.00 605026 1/16/2025 3362 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 2054A26475 PAINT SUPPLIES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 85.21 17786 1/7/2025 3964 DYNA WEAR 7475 UNIFORMS: STAFF: TCSD Credit Card 163.06 17746 12/23/2024 1057 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WA VAR EMWD NOV '24 VARIOUS NOV WATER SERVICES Wire 6,536.30 605027 1/16/2025 2258 ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVE 112858 WATER SYSTEMS MONITORING: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 640.00 303662 1/16/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19134 SCANNING SERVICES: CITY CLERK Printed Check 1,477.42 303662 1/16/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19133 SCANNING SERVICES: CITY CLERK Printed Check 2,487.49 303662 1/16/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19135 SCANNING SERVICES: CITY CLERK Printed Check 5,612.17 303662 1/16/2025 1300 ECS IMAGING INC 19132 SCANNING SERVICES: CITY CLERK Printed Check 14,351.56 303714 1/23/2025 1670 EE VENDOR #1670 Reimb: 01/13/25 REIMB: TEAM PACE: HR Printed Check 250.11 303709 1/23/2025 3350 EE VENDOR#3350 Reimb:'24 Calpers REIMB: CALPERS CONFERENCE: HR Printed Check 627.29 605028 1/16/2025 2385 EIDE BAILLY LLP E101790671 AUDIT SERVICES: FINANCE EFT Posted 15,446.00 605118 1/23/2025 2031 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEM 2024-784 DEC'24 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: WC: HR EFT Posted 1,250.00 303706 1/23/2025 1246 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPME Ben350717 WAGE GARNISHMENT PAYMENT Printed Check 211.63 303663 1/16/2025 1104 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN1028227 PERMIT RENEWAL SPORT RANCH SNACK BAR: TCSD Printed Check 159.00 303663 1/16/2025 1104 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH IN1027709 PERMIT RENEWAL TEMECULA MRC POOL: TCSD Printed Check 446.00 303664 1/16/2025 1004 ESGIL LLC 1242931 Revised NOV PLAN REVIEW SERVICES: BLDG & SAFETY Printed Check 18,974.98 303707 1/23/2025 1004 ESGIL LLC 1218008 OCT PLAN REVIEW SERVICES: BLDG & SAFETY Printed Check 43,512.40 17820 12/3/2024 1305 EWING IRRIGATION PRO PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - EQUIPMENT: PW P Card 73.76 17797 1/7/2025 2749 EXTENDED STAY AMERIC 7386 LODGING: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 539.84 17794 1/7/2025 2749 EXTENDED STAY AMERIC 2496 LODGING: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 879.81 17795 1/7/2025 2749 EXTENDED STAY AMERIC 7963 LODGING: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 1,102.50 303708 1/23/2025 1998 EYEMED VISION CARE 350733 EYEMED COBRA PAYMENT Printed Check 7.56 605029 1/16/2025 2116 FALCON ENGINEERING S 2024-04 SGTP2 CONSTRUCTION MGMT SERVICES: PW19-04 CIP EFT Posted 35,570.00 605119 1/23/2025 2116 FALCON ENGINEERING S 2024-05 SGTP2 CONSTRUCTION MGMT SERVICES: PW19-04 CIP EFT Posted 42,750.00 17770 1/7/2025 2012 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAF 2658 REFRESHMENTS: SISTER CITY WELCOME EVENT: TCSD Credit Card 755.10 17755 1/7/2025 2456 FEDERAL AVIATION ADM 2932 REGISTRATION: DRONE: PD Credit Card 5.00 303665 1/16/2025 1005 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 8-730-71894 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES: ITSS Printed Check 22.22 17832 1/9/2025 1006 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE RTE-7198907 LAND ACQUISITION: APN: 910-262-003 Wire 1,553,773.00 605030 1/16/2025 3359 FOLLANSBEE TRO1 DUCKPOND CREATION/INSTALLATION OF MOSAIC: COMSP EFT Posted 450.00 605031 1/16/2025 2643 FORENSIC NURSES OF S 2828 SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 1,200.00 303666 1/16/2025 1176 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Case 603016103 01/10 VENDOR GARNISHMENT PAYMENT Printed Check 530.43 605120 1/23/2025 1875 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERL 9617 APPAREL EMBROIDERY: LAND DEV: PW EFT Posted 15.00 17761 12/27/2024 2067 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA VAR NOV/DEC'24 VARIOUS NOWDEC INTERNET SERVICES Wire 14,571.61 17801 1/8/2025 4137 GARCIA-CARBONE DANIE Refund: 152276 REFUND: DUPLICATE PAYMENT Credit Card 39.00 605121 1/23/2025 2374 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY IN1030425 CLAIMS TPA: RISK MANAGEMENT EFT Posted 1,559.80 605032 1/16/2025 2722 GEOTAB USA INC IN414871 VEHICLE TELEMATICS: CITY FLEET: ITSS EFT Posted 1,619.50 605033 1/16/2025 3749 GHD INC 380-0061975 DE PORTOLA RD/JEDEDIAH SMITH RD EFT Posted 45,933.39 605034 1/16/2025 2359 GILLIS AND PANICHAPA 108937J ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES: PW-CIP, PW19-07, ON -CALL EFT Posted 10,400.00 303667 1/16/2025 4136 GIRLS ON THE RUN CSF Grant Prgm'25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING GRANT PROGRAM: COMSP Printed Check 2,500.00 303668 1/16/2025 1523 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC Perf: 01/12/25 CLASSICS AT THE MERC: 01/12/25 Printed Check 266.00 17820 12/3/2024 2094 GOSCH FORD TEMECULA PC111824 REPAIR: INSPECTOR VEHICLE: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 791.30 17820 12/3/2024 1007 GOVERNMENT FINANCE O PC111824 GFOA TRAINING WEBINAR: FINANCE P Card 315.00 17762 1/7/2025 1007 GOVERNMENT FINANCE O 2290 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: FINANCE Credit Card 150.00 17763 1/7/2025 1007 GOVERNMENT FINANCE O 9320 REGISTRATION: GAAP UPDATE: FINANCE Credit Card 180.00 605035 1/16/2025 3128 GREEN ACRES INTERACT CSF FY 24/25 CSF GRANT PROGRAM: COMSP EFT Posted 5,000.00 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES P Card 293.21 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES P Card 382.73 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 24.41 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 12.98 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 28.20 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 41.60 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 237.71 17820 12/3/2024 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 20.86 303669 1/16/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC 2634/Dec'24 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: SUPPRESSION: FIRE Printed Check 140.70 303669 1/16/2025 1009 HANKS HARDWARE INC 2818/Dec'24 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: CODE ENFORCEMENT Printed Check 91.98 303670 1/16/2025 2225 HASA INC 1009486 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 549.32 303670 1/16/2025 2225 HASA INC 1011763 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 692.30 303670 1/16/2025 2225 HASA INC 1011764 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 898.32 303670 1/16/2025 2225 HASA INC 1009485 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 1,004.54 303710 1/23/2025 2225 HASA INC 1012801 POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: CITY POOLS: PW Printed Check 329.70 605036 1/16/2025 1093 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL 42612-4472629 MED EMPLOYMENT SCREENING: HR EFT Posted 140.00 17805 1/7/2025 1074 HILTON 0587 LODGING: DEPOSIT: LCW CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 404.63 17806 1/7/2025 1074 HILTON 3417 LODGING: DEPOSIT: LCW CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 404.63 17807 1/7/2025 1074 HILTON 3425 LODGING: DEPOSIT: LCW CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 404.63 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 17809 1/7/2025 1074 HILTON 0009 LODGING: DEPOSIT: LCW CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 404.63 17810 1/7/2025 1074 HILTON 2245 LODGING: DEPOSIT: LCW CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 404.63 17820 12/3/2024 1192 HOME DEPOT PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 43.43 17820 12/3/2024 1192 HOME DEPOT PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 78.82 17820 12/3/2024 1192 HOME DEPOT PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 102.26 17820 12/3/2024 1192 HOME DEPOT PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 135.85 17820 12/3/2024 1192 HOME DEPOT PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 273.86 17752 1/7/2025 1192 HOME DEPOT 5962 SUPPLIES: CHRISTMAS SUPPLIES: FIRE Credit Card 102.11 17754 1/7/2025 3244 HYATT REGENCY 8655 LODGING: INSTITUTE & LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING: PD Credit Card 849.68 17820 12/3/2024 200 HYATT REGENCY PC111824 LODGING: LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 2024 P Card 953.16 17818 1/7/2025 3455 IE PSHRA 0618 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: HR Credit Card 1,137.00 605037 1/16/2025 3911 IMEG CONSULTANTS CDR 24003461.01 - 1 ENGINEERING SERVICES: CRC RENO: PW19-07 EFT Posted 17,900.00 605038 1/16/2025 3481 IMS INFRASTRUCTURE M 241129-8 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE EFT Posted 8,534.30 605039 1/16/2025 2564 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIO 8593 VEHICLE & EQUIPMENT REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW EFT Posted 1,403.53 605040 1/16/2025 1396 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT 266263 COPIER REPAIRS AND MAINT: CITYWIDE: ITSS EFT Posted 504.92 605040 1/16/2025 1396 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT 266262 COPIER REPAIRS AND MAINT: CITYWIDE: ITSS EFT Posted 6,625.92 17640 12/9/2024 2245 INSTACART.COM 7625 REFRESHMENTS: RECRUITMENTS: HR Credit Card 56.60 17736 1/2/2025 1047 INSTATAX EDD Ben350700 STATE TAX PAYMENT Wire 50,104.54 17735 1/2/2025 1027 INSTATAX IRS Ben350696 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT Wire 151,365.76 605041 1/16/2025 2085 INTERPRETERS UNLIMIT 408810 TRANSLATION SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 12.00 17820 12/3/2024 1196 INTL CODE COUNCIL PC111824 RENEWAL: ICC PERMIT CERT: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 100.00 17820 12/3/2024 1196 INTL CODE COUNCIL PC111824 RENEWAL: ICC PERMIT CERT: PREVENTION: FIRE P Card 315.00 17768 1/7/2025 1674 ISTOCK INTL INC 3754 SUBSCRIPTION: PROMO IMAGES: TCSD Credit Card 120.00 605122 1/23/2025 1719 JACOBS HOUSE INC CSF Grant Prgm'25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING GRANT PROGRAM: COMSP EFT Posted 5,000.00 17641 12/9/2024 1630 LABOR LAW CENTER LLC 6348 SUPPLIES: HR Credit Card 84.76 17642 12/9/2024 1630 LABOR LAW CENTER LLC 6363 SUPPLIES: HR Credit Card 1,440.91 303711 1/23/2025 1136 LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL Jan'25 JAN'25 ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES Printed Check 11,031.56 17694 12/9/2024 1788 LAKE ELSINORE VALLEY 5531 REGISTRATION: STATE OF THE CITY: CC Credit Card 103.00 605042 1/16/2025 3111 LAWNSCAPE SYSTEMS IN 449850 WEED ABATEMENT: VARIOUS LOCATIONS: PW EFT Posted 12,432.00 605042 1/16/2025 3111 LAWNSCAPE SYSTEMS IN 449852 WEED ABATEMENT: VARIOUS LOCATIONS: PW EFT Posted 81,705.00 17820 12/3/2024 1014 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA PC111824 REGISTRATION: LEAGUE OF CA CITIES 2024 P Card 25.00 303712 1/23/2025 1014 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA INV-26921-FOYOS3 '25 MEMBERSHIP DUES: CC Printed Check 31,888.00 605043 1/16/2025 2154 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC TMC-02 MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS EFT Posted 435,488.26 17802 1/7/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 4969 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 645.00 17803 1/7/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 0018 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 1,120.00 17804 1/7/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 2381 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 1,120.00 17808 1/7/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 4202 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 2,240.00 605123 1/23/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 283095 NOV HR LEGAL SERVICES FOR TE060-00001: HR EFT Posted 1,483.00 605123 1/23/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 283096 NOV HR LEGAL SERVICES FOR TE060-00022: HR EFT Posted 18,048.30 605123 1/23/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 283097 NOV HR LEGAL SERVICES FOR TE060-00023: HR EFT Posted 43.50 605123 1/23/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 283098 NOV HR LEGAL SERVICES FOR TE060-00024: HR EFT Posted 4,842.00 605123 1/23/2025 1320 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT 283099 NOV HR LEGAL SERVICES FOR TE060-00025: HR EFT Posted 136.00 605124 1/23/2025 1216 LIFE ASSIST INC 1540037 CPR PROGRAM SUPPLIES: MEDIC: FIRE EFT Posted 540.27 17791 1/7/2025 3477 LONGS DRUG STORES 5379 SUPPLIES: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 252.68 605044 1/16/2025 3198 LOOMIS ARMORED US 13643367 ARMORED CAR SERVICES: FINANCE EFT Posted 1,610.90 17820 12/3/2024 200 LOWES #00775* PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 46.13 17780 1/7/2025 1722 LUCILLES BBQ 0101 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL MTG: CC Credit Card 337.09 303713 1/23/2025 1224 MAIN STREET SIGNS 46310 CITY STREET NAME SIGN: HR Printed Check 77.81 303713 1/23/2025 1224 MAIN STREET SIGNS 46508 CITY STREET NAME SIGN: HR Printed Check 77.81 17751 1/7/2025 2693 MARGARITAS COCINA Y 1127 REFRESHMENTS: FIRE STAFF MTG: FIRE Credit Card 94.97 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3763 ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY TREE TRIMMING: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 995.45 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3795 ANNUAL RIGHT OF WAY TREE TRIMMING: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 1,564.20 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3760 ANNUAL TREE TRIMMING & SERVICE: OLD TOWN: PW EFT Posted 12,772.39 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3798 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 856.86 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3800 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 1,099.94 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3801 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 6,103.62 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3765 EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 9,788.70 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3791 TREE MAINT SERVICES: HARVESTON SLOPE: PW EFT Posted 5,877.56 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3767 TREE REMOVAL: PASEO DEL SOL MEDIAN: PW EFT Posted 1,268.64 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3797 TREE TRIMMING SERVICES: CAMPOS VERDES SLOPE: PW EFT Posted 5,114.36 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3794 TREE TRIMMING: HARVESTON LAKE PARK: PW EFT Posted 4,966.03 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3759 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 845.92 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3796 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 900.60 605126 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3802 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 1,425.64 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3793 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 1,695.46 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3762 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 6,898.48 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3764 TREE TRIMMING: VILLAGE SLOPE: PW EFT Posted 14,088.78 605125 1/23/2025 2619 MARIPOSA TREE MANAGE 3792 TREE TRIMMING: WOODCREST SLOPE: PW EFT Posted 6,555.74 17792 1/7/2025 4122 MCDONALDS 0845 REFRESHMENTS: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 18.04 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 605127 1/23/2025 2057 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 19150 NOV CONSULTING SERVICES: CDBG ADMINISTRATION EFT Posted 4,108.25 303671 1/16/2025 1924 MEHEULA MUSIC PRODUC 01/14/25 MULTIPLE HAWAIIAN PERFORMANCES Printed Check 5,000.00 303715 1/23/2025 1924 MEHEULA MUSIC PRODUC 01/13/25 TEMECULA PRESENTS: POLYNESIAN REVUE: TCSD Printed Check 1,181.88 17695 12/9/2024 2025 MENIFEE VALLEY CHAMB 9258 REGISTRATION: STATE OF THE CITY: CC Credit Card 75.00 17772 1/7/2025 4120 MERITAGE AT CALLAWAY 6817 REFRESHMENTS: DAISEN SISTER CITY Credit Card 307.90 303716 1/23/2025 1185 MET LIFE INSURANCE C 350732 METLIFE COBRA PAYMENT - DIVISION 0002 Printed Check 58.69 605128 1/23/2025 2042 MICHAEL BAKER INTERN 1234527 LONG CANYON CREEK PARK RESTROOM EFT Posted 17,459.32 17820 12/3/2024 1111 MICHAELS STORES INC PC111824 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENT: TCSD P Card 43.41 17782 1/7/2025 1111 MICHAELS STORES INC 0104 SUPPLIES: FRAMES: CITY CLERK Credit Card 193.66 605129 1/23/2025 2259 MICHELLE MEDINA 1040.101-1st INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 1,496.25 303672 1/16/2025 1354 MICHELLES PLACE CANC CSF Grant Prgm'25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING GRANT PROGRAM: COMSP Printed Check 5,000.00 605045 1/16/2025 1327 MIKES PRECISION WELD 408523 WELDING SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 190.00 605130 1/23/2025 1795 MIKO MOUNTAINLION IN 1202 GUARDRAIL REPAIRS: DE PORTOLA: PW EFT Posted 19,020.00 605131 1/23/2025 3994 MINUTEMAN PRESS 69345 BUSINESS CARDS: PLANNING EFT Posted 154.26 605131 1/23/2025 3994 MINUTEMAN PRESS 69712 BUSINESS CARDS: CODE ENF: COMM DEV EFT Posted 93.66 605131 1/23/2025 3994 MINUTEMAN PRESS 69772 BUSINESS CARDS: SUPPRESSION: FIRE EFT Posted 221.54 605131 1/23/2025 3994 MINUTEMAN PRESS 69517 SUPPLIES: COMM DEV EFT Posted 1,041.00 17820 12/3/2024 1241 MISSION ELECTRIC SUP PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 336.44 303673 1/16/2025 3856 MNS ENGINEERS 88329 ENG SERVICES: GREAT OAK LIGHT POLE: PW21-16 Printed Check 4,560.00 17720 11/1/2024 2830 MOOD MEDIA NORTH AME NOV'24 NOV'24 DISH NETWORK SERVICES Wire 266.81 17747 12/3/2024 2830 MOOD MEDIA NORTH AME DEC'24 DEC'24 DISH NETWORK SERVICES Wire 266.81 605046 1/16/2025 1287 MOORE FENCE COMPANY 24-8301 FENCE INSTALLATION: RRSP PICKLEBALL COURTS: PW EFT Posted 23,650.44 605132 1/23/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 12/14/24 GRAPHIC DESIGN: ART EVENTS & MUSEUM MURALS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 605132 1/23/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 01/09/25 GRAPHIC DESIGN: ART EVENTS & MUSEUM MURALS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 605132 1/23/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 01/15/25 GRAPHIC DESIGN: ART EVENTS & MUSEUM MURALS: TCSD EFT Posted 750.00 605132 1/23/2025 1240 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J 2050.101 '24 INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 787.50 17790 1/7/2025 3509 MOTEL 6 6334 LODGING: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 399.72 605047 1/16/2025 1281 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTIN 433965 SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING LED RETROFIT AT RRSP EFT Posted 783,000.00 605133 1/23/2025 2081 MUSIC CONNECTION LLC Perf: 01/11/25 SPEAKEASY @ THE MERC: 01/11/25 EFT Posted 574.00 17820 12/3/2024 3940 MUSIC THEATRE INTL PC111824 THEATER -PRODUCTION CONTRACTS: THEATER: TCSD P Card 750.00 605134 1/23/2025 2268 MUSSON THEATRICAL IN 00477725 SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD EFT Posted 60.44 605048 1/16/2025 2020 MYTHOS TECHNOLOGY IN MSP-23215 JAN-MAR NETWORK SERVICES: INCUBATOR EFT Posted 450.00 17820 12/3/2024 200 NAPA AUTO PARTS PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - VEHICLE: PW P Card 622.47 303719 1/23/2025 100 NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE - TEMECULA VALLEY 81593945 REFUND SECURITY DEPOSIT: TCC MULTIPURPOSE ROOM Printed Check 200.00 303717 1/23/2025 1071 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF C 191835 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: CITY COUNCIL Printed Check 10,288.00 17737 1/2/2025 1038 NATIONWIDE RETIREMEN Ben350702 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 5,769.78 303674 1/16/2025 2188 NETFILE INC 9847 CAMPAIGN E-FILING AND ADMIN SYSTEM: CITY CLERK Printed Check 7,700.00 17773 1/7/2025 2255 NETFLIX.COM 5858 MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE: TEEN ROOM: CRC Credit Card 15.49 303675 1/16/2025 1760 NEW TANGRAM LLC 692317 OFFICE FURNITURE: FIRE Printed Check 2,173.67 605055 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79799 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RANCHO CAL MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 72.06 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79543 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RANCHO CAL MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 224.85 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79800 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: RANCHO CAL MEDIANS: PW EFT Posted 226.45 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79827 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 72.06 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79828 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 72.06 605055 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79849 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 72.06 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79829 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 99.52 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79826 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79824 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79825 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79818 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79846 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79830 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79816 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79848 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79822 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79806 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605054 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79845 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 103.02 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79819 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 120.08 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79820 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 120.08 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79817 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 139.41 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79805 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 144.56 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79847 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 159.83 605053 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79851 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 173.81 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79842 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 194.21 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79838 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 224.25 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79802 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 224.85 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79841 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 226.89 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79839 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 246.53 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79840 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 270.15 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79821 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 270.33 605052 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79811 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 271.81 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79815 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 275.71 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79835 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 280.15 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79812 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 280.15 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79813 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 281.35 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79804 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 286.93 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79810 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 290.03 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79844 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 292.90 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79823 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 297.71 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79850 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 307.37 605051 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79803 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 340.36 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79808 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 356.69 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79843 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 357.86 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79809 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 373.96 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79831 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 379.96 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79833 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 384.69 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79837 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 387.03 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79834 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 579.77 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79836 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 640.28 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79832 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 642.59 605050 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79814 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 686.71 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79852 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES: PW EFT Posted 738.44 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79542 LANDSCAPE RENOVATION: LONG CANYON CREEK PARK: PW EFT Posted 12,745.00 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79541 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: CIVIC CENTER: PW EFT Posted 1,546.00 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79539 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: DUCK POND PRKING LOT: PW EFT Posted 990.41 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79540 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: DUCK POND: PW EFT Posted 1,701.56 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79537 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: MURRIETA CREEK TRAIL: PW EFT Posted 1,200.00 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79536 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 2,100.00 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79535 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 1,600.00 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79853 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: TEMECULA DUCK POND: PW EFT Posted 3,184.12 605049 1/16/2025 2578 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 79538 REMEDIAL LANDSCAPE SERVICES: VOORBURG PARK: PW EFT Posted 966.00 303718 1/23/2025 2571 NORMAN A TRAUB & ASS 24046.3 WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: HR Printed Check 797.50 303718 1/23/2025 2571 NORMAN A TRAUB & ASS 24048.3 WORKPLACE INVESTIGATIONS: HR Printed Check 3,625.00 17781 1/7/2025 2327 NOTHING BUNDT CAKES 1189 REFRESHMENTS: CITY COUNCIL RECOGNITION: CC Credit Card 356.89 605056 1/16/2025 1819 NPG INC 1123388 OLD TOWN PARKING STRUCTURE: PW EFT Posted 200,615.96 605057 1/16/2025 1511 NV5 INC 422515 MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER: PW EFT Posted 672.23 17776 1/7/2025 4126 OLD TOWN SWEET SHOP 6216 RECOGNITION: COMMISSIONER RETIREMENT: CLERK Credit Card 14.11 605058 1/16/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 77390 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 54.20 605058 1/16/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 077660 VEHICLE REPAIR MAINT: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 57.46 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 077704 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: STREETS: PW EFT Posted 273.50 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 077705 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: STREETS: PW EFT Posted 410.09 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 77573 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: EMERGENCY MGMNT: FIRE EFT Posted 48.78 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 77614 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 89.54 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 77476 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 174.20 605135 1/23/2025 2496 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SE 77441 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 1,293.44 605059 1/16/2025 1164 P V P COMMUNICATIONS 135949 MOTOR HELMET COMMUNICATIONS: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 6,659.80 17634 12/9/2024 4102 PACIFIC ERGONOMICS 9206 SUPPLIES: ERGONIMIC COMPUTER MOUSE: HR Credit Card 222.08 303676 1/16/2025 2206 PARKING LOGIX INC SIN02658 ANNUAL CLOUD FEE: OLD TOWN PARKING: PW Printed Check 5,400.00 605060 1/16/2025 3785 PATRICK PATTIE 6954 JANITORIAL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 11,485.00 17759 1/7/2025 1401 PAYPAL 1908 REGISTRATION: CAL CITIES CITY MANAGER CONF: CMO Credit Card 90.00 17764 1/7/2025 1401 PAYPAL 0512 VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO TRANSACTION: TCSD Credit Card 25.00 17769 1/7/2025 1401 PAYPAL 2614 VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO TRANSACTION: TCSD Credit Card 127.30 17820 12/3/2024 200 PERRIS FENCE & SUPPLY PC111824 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES P Card 2,372.66 17800 12/3/2024 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIR Ben350709 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 1,459.40 17825 12/13/2024 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIR Ben350710 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 647.71 17826 12/23/2024 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIR Ben350711 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 574.83 17827 12/23/2024 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIR Ben350712 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 729.71 17733 1/2/2025 1017 PERS EMPLOYEES RETIR Ben350694 PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT Wire 176,348.51 17732 1/2/2025 1016 PERS HEALTH INSUR PR Ben350690 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT Wire 224,947.97 17820 12/3/2024 200 PIZZA FACTORY - TEMECULA PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: SPECIAL EVENT: TCSD P Card 287.25 605136 1/23/2025 2468 PLACEWORKS INC TEM-08.0-2 OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AMENDMENT:LR23-0490 EFT Posted 38.75 605136 1/23/2025 2468 PLACEWORKS INC TEM-08.0-3 OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS AMENDMENT:LR23-0490 EFT Posted 143.75 17639 12/9/2024 4104 PLAYBILL 5296 ADVERTISEMENT: THEATER: HR Credit Card 39.95 605137 1/23/2025 3271 POWERSPORTS UNLIMITE 49024 VEHICLE REPAIR MAINT: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 45.08 17820 12/3/2024 200 POZITIVE ENTERPRISES PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE: PW P Card 889.58 303720 1/23/2025 1363 PRE PAID LEGAL SERVI Ben350686 PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT Printed Check 213.90 605061 1/16/2025 1493 PREMIER MARKETING IN 3155 EVENT PERFORMANCE SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 4,650.00 17778 1/7/2025 1020 PRESS ENTERPRISE COM 1111 ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: CITY CLERK Credit Card 14.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 17767 1/7/2025 1020 PRESS ENTERPRISE COM 0980 ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: TCSD Credit Card 18.00 605138 1/23/2025 3971 PRN PRODUCTIONS PERF: 01/10/25 TICKET SERVICES AGREEMENT: FRIDAY NIGHT LIVE 01/10/25 EFT Posted 79.25 605139 1/23/2025 1721 PRO ACTIVE FIRE DESI 2163 PLAN CHECKING SERVICES: PREVENTION: FIRE EFT Posted 16,068.80 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291626 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 9.89 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293984 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 9.89 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292807 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 9.89 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290498 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 9.89 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293968 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 12.74 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292789 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 12.74 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290479 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 12.74 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291610 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 12.74 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292295 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 17.75 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132289976 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 17.75 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293472 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 17.75 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291151 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 17.75 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290474 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 21.43 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292785 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 21.43 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293964 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 21.43 605064 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291606 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 21.43 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292784 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 22.25 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290475 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 22.25 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292798 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 23.86 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290489 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 23.86 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290485 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 25.00 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293969 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 27.55 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291611 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 27.55 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290488 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 60.71 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293977 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 60.71 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292797 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 60.71 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132291619 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 60.71 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293029 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 107.66 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132290721 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 107.66 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293471B UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 1.76 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132289975B UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 1.76 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293470A UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 58.45 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132289974A UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 63.00 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292293A UNIFORMS: PW PARKS & FACILITIES:PW EFT Posted 56.03 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132289974B UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 9.24 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132292293B UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 9.24 605065 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293470B UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 9.24 605063 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132289975A UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 41.63 605062 1/16/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132293471A UNIFORMS: STREET MAINTENANCE: PW EFT Posted 50.81 605140 1/23/2025 1336 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL S 132294627 FLOOR MATS AND TOWEL RENTALS: PW FACILITIES EFT Posted 17.75 17648 12/9/2024 1526 PUBLIC AGENCY RISK M 5050 REGISTRATION: CONFERENCE: RISK Credit Card 399.00 303677 1/16/2025 2635 PUBLIC SAFETY ENTERP PE0000002270B EMERGENCY RADIO RENTAL 11/1/24-11/30/24: PD Printed Check 126.99 303677 1/16/2025 2635 PUBLIC SAFETY ENTERP PE0000002270A EMERGENCY RADIO RENTAL 11/1/24-11/30/24: PD Printed Check 634.95 605066 1/16/2025 2727 QUADIENT FINANCE USA PPLN01 12/09/24 POSTAGE SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF: PD EFT Posted 289.00 303721 1/23/2025 2290 QUESTICA LTD INV126755 UPGRADE: BUDGET SOFTWARE: FINANCE Printed Check 1,937.50 303678 1/16/2025 2169 QUINN COMPANY WOG00021709 PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE TESTING: CRC: PW Printed Check 3,472.00 17760 12/13/2024 1021 RANCHO CALIF WATER D NOV'24 WATER 1 VARIOUS WATER SERVICES NOV BATCH 1 Wire 47,678.38 17798 12/20/2024 1021 RANCHO CALIF WATER D NOV'24 WATER 2 VARIOUS WATER SERVICES NOV BATCH 2 Wire 18,382.29 17831 12/27/2024 1021 RANCHO CALIF WATER D NOV'24 WATER 3 VARIOUS WATER SERVICES NOV BATCH 3 Wire 20,803.90 17820 12/3/2024 3702 RANCHO HYDRAULICS PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: FIRE: PW P Card 61.16 303722 1/23/2025 2535 RANCHO RUNNERS INC 103967 EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES: HR Printed Check 55.00 303679 1/16/2025 1661 RANCON COMMERCE CENT 1077825 JAN-MAR'25 JAN-MAR'25 ASSN DUES: ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST Printed Check 510.71 605067 1/16/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT 33771 SIGNAGE: CIVIC CENTER: PW EFT Posted 438.05 605141 1/23/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT 33716 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 624.50 605141 1/23/2025 1537 RANDALL MANAGEMENT 33696 SIGN POSTING: PLANNING: COMDV EFT Posted 2,498.00 605068 1/16/2025 2181 REYES NICOLE 34677985 LAUNDRY SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 615.75 605143 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251255 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 28.00 605143 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251241 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 55.00 605143 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251243 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 76.50 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251253 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 152.50 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251242 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,337.00 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251251 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,418.99 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251250 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,658.50 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251248 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 1,855.29 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251249 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 2,346.03 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251244 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 4,069.50 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251246 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 8,563.93 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 251247 DECEMBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 9,109.00 605142 1/23/2025 1150 RICHARDS WATSON AND 250502 OCTOBER 2024 LEGAL SERVICES EFT Posted 952.34 17771 1/7/2025 1393 RICHIES REAL AMERICA 5577 REFRESHMENTS: SISTER CITY WELCOME EVENT: TCSD Credit Card 203.35 303723 1/23/2025 1023 RIVERSIDE CO HABITAT 01/16/25 K-RAT DECEMBER 2024: FIN Printed Check 940.00 303724 1/23/2025 1807 RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2025-109 BOOTH SPACE - ICSC LAS VEGAS CONFERENCE: COMDV Printed Check 4,000.00 17749 1/7/2025 3707 ROCKET CARWASH LLC 0507 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE: CAR WASH: FIRE Credit Card 9.99 17820 12/3/2024 200 ROMANO'S MACARONI GR PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: TP PRESENTS: THEATER: TCSD P Card 100.61 17820 12/3/2024 1265 SAFE AND SECURE LOCK PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITIES: PW P Card 380.63 605069 1/16/2025 1552 SANBORN GWYNETH A CO PERF: 01/04/25 TICKET SERVICES AGREEMENT: COUNTRY LIVE @ THE MERC 01/04 EFT Posted 840.75 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12102024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: CITY MANAGER: COMSP EFT Posted 400.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12122024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MPSC/HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12202024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MPSC/HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12182024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MPSC/HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12032024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MUSEUM/ACE: TCSD EFT Posted 350.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12142024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MUSEUM/ACE: TCSD EFT Posted 350.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12312024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 605070 1/16/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12052024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 605144 1/23/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12132024A PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: ID BADGES: HR EFT Posted 3,000.00 605144 1/23/2025 2008 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA P 12112024 PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: MPSC/HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605071 1/16/2025 2817 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC AL546188 POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW EFT Posted 47.85 605145 1/23/2025 1509 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC PERF: 01/09/25 USER LICENSE AGREEMENT: JAZZ @ THE MERC 01/09/25 EFT Posted 605.00 303680 1/16/2025 1787 SHRED IT US JV LLC 8009320387 SHREDDING SERVICES: CITYWIDE: CITY CLERK Printed Check 275.48 303680 1/16/2025 1787 SHRED IT US JV LLC 8009320538 SHREDDING SERVICES: MALL SUBSTATION & OTSF:TEM SHERIFF Printed Check 48.90 303725 1/23/2025 1787 SHRED IT US JV LLC 8009625049 SHREDDING SERVICES: CITYWIDE: CITY CLERK Printed Check 344.60 17820 12/3/2024 3920 SHUTTERFLY INC PC111824 SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENT: TCSD P Card 63.91 605072 1/16/2025 1780 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISE 2202 OVERNIGHT SECURITY: TCSD FACILITIES EFT Posted 4,050.00 605072 1/16/2025 1780 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISE 2203 OVERNIGHT SECURITY: TCSD FACILITIES EFT Posted 6,784.40 605073 1/16/2025 3659 SITEONE LANDSCAPE 148358339-001 IRRIGATION UPDATES: HARVESTON LAKE PARK: PW EFT Posted 8,034.37 17820 12/3/2024 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC PC111824 REFRESHMENTS: SPECIAL EVENT: TCSD P Card 194.90 605074 1/16/2025 1061 SMART AND FINAL INC 01/08/25 SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 247.63 605075 1/16/2025 3170 SMER RESEARCH 50052 DECEMBER SOLAR GENERATION VARIOUS LOCATIONS EFT Posted 16,566.99 17740 11/26/2024 1094 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY OCT'24 GAS SVCS VARIOUS OCT SO CAL GAS SERVICES Wire 6,816.76 605146 1/23/2025 2217 SOCIAL WORK ACTION G 12312024 HOMELESS OUTREACH SERVICES: TCSD EFT Posted 42,296.20 17638 12/9/2024 4103 SOCIETY OF HUMAN RES 3720 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: HR Credit Card 264.00 303681 1/16/2025 1153 SOUTH COAST AIR QUAL 4459079 FY 24/25 FLAT FEE: LAST FY EMISSIONS: TPL Printed Check 165.96 303681 1/16/2025 1153 SOUTH COAST AIR QUAL 4456869 FY 24/25 1 C E ELEC GEN DIESEL: TPL Printed Check 541.04 605077 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301492 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 36.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301504 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301719 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301502 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 123.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301495 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 120.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302410 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 123.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302441 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 49.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302901 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 49.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301837 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 49.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301646 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605076 1/16/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301640 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 95.00 605148 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302762 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 29.00 605148 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302387 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 32.00 605148 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302615 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 40.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302662 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 42.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302397 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 56.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302567 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 74.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302412 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302707 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302408 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 90.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302399 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 120.00 605148 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302483 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FIRE STATIONS EFT Posted 42.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0301593 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: FIRE STATIONS EFT Posted 80.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302346 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 70.00 605147 1/23/2025 1055 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CO 0302532 PEST CONTROL SERVICES: PARKS: PW EFT Posted 90.00 303682 1/16/2025 1704 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 45949250101 DEC GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,0978,0979 Printed Check 462.27 17820 12/3/2024 1399 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES PC111824 AIRFARE: MUNICIPAL SPECIAL EVENTS ASSOC CONFERENCE: TCSD P Card 1,101.94 17820 12/3/2024 200 SO *CAMPAIGN FIRE COINS A PC111824 PROMOTIONAL: SPECIAL EVENTS: SUPPRESSION: FIRE P Card 1,725.00 605078 1/16/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 785829 NOV BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: PD EFT Posted 875.00 605078 1/16/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 781329b NOV FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: CONTRACT INSTRUCTORS EFT Posted 49.00 605078 1/16/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 781329a NOV FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: HR EFT Posted 245.00 605078 1/16/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 781329c NOV FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: INTERN/VOLUNTEER LIVESCANS EFT Posted 294.00 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 605078 1/16/2025 1263 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 781329d NOV FINGERPRINTING SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF EFT Posted 3,659.00 303683 1/16/2025 1179 STATE WATER RESOURCE 579544 PERMIT REGISTRATION: PW21-03 Printed Check 619.00 303684 1/16/2025 2016 STC TRAFFIC INC 7612 TRAFFIC SIGNAL -SAFETY LIGHTS: PW23-13 Printed Check 24,387.50 605149 1/23/2025 1747 STOVER JEFFREY PERF: 01/12/25 TICKET SERVICES AGREEMENT: RAT PACK BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION EFT Posted 7,486.33 303685 1/16/2025 1112 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS 250775 WINDOW TINTING: CIVIC CENTER: PW Printed Check 2,490.00 605079 1/16/2025 1081 SWARCO MCCAIN INC INV0284014 TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: PW EFT Posted 1,087.51 303686 1/16/2025 2261 T MOBILE USA INC 9591781254 GPS LOCATE 01/01/25-1/29/25: PD Printed Check 115.00 17796 1/7/2025 3536 TARGET 6769 SUPPLIES: HOMELESS CLIENT: TCSD Credit Card 139.39 605150 1/23/2025 1113 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Ben350678 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT EFT Posted 4,636.00 17777 1/7/2025 4127 TEMECULA HOUSE OF JE 7965 RECOGNITION: COMMISSIONER RETIREMENT: CLERK Credit Card 8.00 605151 1/23/2025 3351 TEMECULA THEATER FOU PERF:12/13-12/23 TICKET SERVICES AGREEMENT: NUTCRACKER BALLET EFT Posted 61,702.97 17753 1/7/2025 1054 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAM 0597 BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL: POLICE Credit Card 4.00 605080 1/16/2025 1054 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAM 1047 FY 24/25 SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT: ECON DEV EFT Posted 50,000.00 605152 1/23/2025 4135 TEMECULA VALLEY WRIT 01/14/25 FY 24/25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING: COMSP EFT Posted 5,000.00 17820 12/3/2024 1234 TEMECULA WINNELSON C PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: LIBRARY: PW P Card 430.52 605081 1/16/2025 1232 TERRYBERRY COMPANY S29181 SERVICE RECOGNITION: HR EFT Posted 82.91 605153 1/23/2025 1232 TERRYBERRY COMPANY S36459 SERVICE RECOGNITION: HR EFT Posted 101.65 17811 1/7/2025 4134 THE INSTITUTES 0329 REGISTRATION & TRAINING MATERIALS: HR Credit Card 494.22 303687 1/16/2025 1434 THESSALONIKA FAMILY 01/08/25 FY 24/25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING: COMSP Printed Check 5,000.00 17779 1/7/2025 4099 THUNDER AND LIGHTNIN 1378 RECOGNITION: COMMISSIONER RETIREMENT: CLERK Credit Card 414.00 605082 1/16/2025 1936 TIERCE NICHOLAS NTOTTCT-2025-01 GRAPHIC DESIGN: THEATER: TCSD EFT Posted 4,920.00 17741 11/19/2024 1568 TIME WARNER CABLE NOV'24 SPECTRUM VARIOUS NOV INTERNET SERVICES Wire 1,301.15 17788 1/7/2025 4121 TIMES SQUARE NEW YOR 0953 REFRESHMENTS: CITY CENSUS: TCSD Credit Card 143.47 605083 1/16/2025 1063 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS 25409 ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES: ART NIGHTS MUSIC: TCSD EFT Posted 250.00 605084 1/16/2025 2421 TITAN RENTAL GROUP 01/08/25 REFUND RENEWAL FEE FOR BUSINESS LICENSE EFT Posted 39.00 605084 1/16/2025 2421 TITAN RENTAL GROUP 48092 RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 928.35 605084 1/16/2025 2421 TITAN RENTAL GROUP 48088 RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 646.97 303726 1/23/2025 1362 TITOS AUTO UPHOLSTER 10/16/24 CANOPY SHADE RECLOTH: PDOTSF: PW Printed Check 1,190.25 605154 1/23/2025 2089 TNT ENTERTAINMENT GR 25271 DJ SERVICES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD EFT Posted 22,000.00 17649 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 1903 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 323.44 17650 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 1952 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 627.29 17651 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 6909 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 627.29 17653 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 4533 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 627.29 17654 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 2863 LODGING: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 627.29 17645 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 9082 REFRESHMENTS: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 101.89 17652 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 8181 REFRESHMENTS: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 111.74 17647 12/9/2024 1594 TOWN & COUNTRY RESOR 7434 REFRESHMENTS: CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 137.29 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 LODGING: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 323.44 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 LODGING: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 627.29 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 4.31 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 28.47 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 29.74 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 45.79 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 42.02 17820 12/3/2024 200 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT PC111824 MEAL: CALPERS CONFERENCE: FINANCE P Card 53.26 605085 1/16/2025 2413 TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFA 22735 STATE LEGISLATIVE CONSULTING: CITY CLERK EFT Posted 6,000.00 303688 1/16/2025 2006 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1183272 TRAFFIC CONTROL: SANTA PARADE: TCSD Printed Check 2,661.25 303727 1/23/2025 2006 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT 1187486 TRAFFIC CONTROL: SANTA PARADE: TCSD Printed Check 77,789.80 17787 1/7/2025 2899 T-SHIRT MART 0146 UNIFORMS: STAFF: TCSD Credit Card 102.44 17820 12/3/2024 200 TUSKER METALS PC111824 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES P Card 16.27 17820 12/3/2024 200 TUSKER METALS PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 51.66 17820 12/3/2024 200 TUSKER METALS PC111824 REPAIR & MAINTENANCE - FACILITY: PW P Card 329.13 303689 1/16/2025 1350 U S BANK 7586097 TAX ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2017 A&B Printed Check 3,850.00 605086 1/16/2025 3933 ULTIMATE MAINTENANCE 34529B NOV JANITORIAL SERVICES: OTSF: TEM SHERIFF:PD EFT Posted 533.30 605086 1/16/2025 3933 ULTIMATE MAINTENANCE 34529A NOV. JANITORIAL SERV: CITY & TCSD FACILITIES: PW EFT Posted 27,400.90 605087 1/16/2025 1432 UNDERGROUND SERVICE 24-252268 DECEMBER: DIG SAFE BILLABLE TIX: PW EFT Posted 91.86 605087 1/16/2025 1432 UNDERGROUND SERVICE 1220240748 DECEMBER: DIG SAFE BILLABLE TIX: PW EFT Posted 189.45 17643 12/9/2024 3500 UPLIFT DESK 3301 ERGONOMIC STANDING DESK: HR Credit Card 876.09 605155 1/23/2025 1050 VERDANTAS INC 65410 GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES: SIDEWALKS CITYWIDE: PWSW-02 EFT Posted 483.75 605155 1/23/2025 1050 VERDANTAS INC 65436 MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES: SOUTH SIDE 6TH ST: PW22-16 EFT Posted 987.25 605155 1/23/2025 1050 VERDANTAS INC 65052 SOILS & MATERIAL TESTING: PW-CIP, PW21-03 EFT Posted 868.20 17765 1/7/2025 2128 VERIATO INC 4703 SOFTWARE RENEWAL: ITSS Credit Card 165.00 605088 1/16/2025 1505 VILLAGE NEWS INC 31970 GRAPHIC DESIGN AND ADVERTISING: COMSP EFT Posted 650.00 605089 1/16/2025 1498 VISION ONE INC INV-77856 TICKET SERVICES AGREEMENT: THEATER: TCSD EFT Posted 5,919.54 605156 1/23/2025 2034 WADDLETON JEFFREY L 1230 DJ SERVICES: HIGH HOPES PROGRAM: TCSD EFT Posted 550.00 605156 1/23/2025 2034 WADDLETON JEFFREY L 505.101 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS: TCSD EFT Posted 400.00 17784 1/7/2025 2213 WALL STREET JOURNAL 8903 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: PLANNING Credit Card 587.12 11789 1/7/2025 1439 WALMART 2108 SUPPLIES: CITY CENSUS: TCSD Credit Card 206.82 17785 1/7/2025 1439 WALMART 5602 SUPPLIES: RESOURCE CENTER: TCSD Credit Card 267.26 Check # Check Date Vendor # Vendor Name Invoice Description Payment Type Invoice Net 17817 1/7/2025 4095 WALT DISNEY WORLD 5678 LODGING: PARMA CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 326.43 17816 1/7/2025 4095 WALT DISNEY WORLD 3392 LODGING: PARMA CONFERENCE: HR Credit Card 587.34 605157 1/23/2025 3642 WAVES PROJECT INC 01/03/25 FY 24/25 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING: COMSP EFT Posted 5,000.00 303690 1/16/2025 1102 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPL 82934248 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: FACILITY MAINT: PW Printed Check 144.76 17815 1/7/2025 1474 WES FLOWERS 5937 SUNSHINE FUND Credit Card 81.55 17814 1/7/2025 1474 WES FLOWERS 5929 SUNSHINE FUND Credit Card 92.43 303691 1/16/2025 1033 WEST PUBLISHING CORP 851295224 SOFTWARE SUBSCRIPTION: TEM SHERIFF:PD Printed Check 1,321.44 605090 1/16/2025 1454 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO AUG'24 AUG'24 MSHCP PAYMENT EFT Posted 23,455.03 605158 1/23/2025 1454 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO NOV'24 NOV'24 MSHCP PAYMENT EFT Posted 29,072.00 605158 1/23/2025 1454 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO OCT'24 OCT'24 MSHCP PAYMENT EFT Posted 39,905.85 303692 1/16/2025 2322 WEX BANK 102077984 12/07-01/06 FUEL USAGE: POLICE: PD Printed Check 1,862.55 605092 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0275 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605092 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0286 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605092 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0274 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 300.00 605092 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0283 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 365.00 605092 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0277 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 450.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0284 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 495.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0285 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 550.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0280 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 600.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0273 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 1,050.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0271 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 1,245.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0276 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 1,250.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0278 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 1,595.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0282 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 2,860.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0272 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 3,255.00 605091 1/16/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0287 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 4,200.00 605159 1/23/2025 3729 WILD WEST JUNK REMOV INV0288 DANGEROUS & UNHEALTHY ENCAMPMENT: TCSD EFT Posted 1,535.00 605160 1/23/2025 1069 WINCHAK KRIS R 24.11 ENG PLAN CHECK & REVIEW: LAND DEV: PW EFT Posted 2,775.00 TOTAL 5,628,386.93 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve City Treasurer's Report for the Periods of November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 and December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 PREPARED BY: Ward Komers, Assistant Director of Finance Seleen Saiid, Accounting Technician I RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the City Treasurer's report for the periods of November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 and December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, US Bank demand deposit account, trust, and custody statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 for the periods of November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 and December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENT: 1. City Treasurer's Report - November 1, 2024 through November 30, 2024 2. City Treasurer's Report - December 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024 City of Temecula CALIFORNIA Aft a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Treasurer's Report November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY.....................................................................3 2.0 FUND ACTIVITY......................................................................................................................4 3.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO STATISTICS..................................................................6 4.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS...........................................................7 5.0 APPENDIX A - ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS.........................................................8 6.0 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS......................................................................................10 November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 2 of 11 City of Temecula 1.0 CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Cash and Investments Liquidity Portfolio US Bank (Demand Deposit Accounts) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) Petty Cash Total Liquidity Portfolio Long-term Portfolio (Investments) Trust Portfolio California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) PublicAgency Retirement Services Trust (PARS) Total Trust Portfolio Total Cash and Investments Earnings on Cash and Investments LAIFEarnings (Quarterly) Change Long-term Portfolio (Monthly) % Change CERBT Earnings (Quarterly) % Change PARS Trust (Monthly) % Change Money Center ICS (Monthly) Change Cash Sweep (Monthly) % Change Total Earnings on Cash and Investments % Change Treasurer's Report Cash and Investment Summary Trailing Six Month Period (Book Value Including Realized Gains/Losses) JuneO 1uly0 AugustM September() October0 November() 17,206, 322.44 8% 43, 420,408.50 20% 40, 662, 626.60 19% 45,182, 073.41 21% 40, 662, 384.63 19% 48, 514,430.19 23% 112,535, 462.62 51% 82, 750,992.59 38% 88, 750, 992.59 42% 88, 750, 992.59 41% 89, 798,171.30 42% 79, 798,171.30 37% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% 129,745,111.06 59% 126,174,727.09 58% 129,416,945.19 61% 133,936,392.00 61% 130,463,881.93 60% 128,315,927.49 60% 57,840,246.51 26% 58,141,756.45 27% 58,292,940.45 27% 58,639,498.72 27% 58,892,551.02 27% 58,946,278.07 28% 20,472, 093.57 9% 20,472, 093.57 9% 20, 472, 093.57 10% 22,136, 509.77 10% 22,136,509.77 10% 22,136,509.77 10% 10,868,495.12 5% 11,113,554.01 5% 4,225,273.56* 2% 4,282,819.36 2% 4,195,118.20 2% 4,288,083.46 2% 31,340,588.69 14% 31,585,647.58 15% 24,697,367.13 12% 26,419,329.13 12% 26,331,627.97 12% 26,424,593.23 12% 218,925,946.26 100% 215,902,131.12 100% 212,407,252.77 100% 218,995,219.85 100% 215,688,060.92 100% 213,686,798.79 1009'. 1,215, 529.97 1,047,178.71 1.08% 1.18% 128, 539.19 365, 409.94 217,216.61 346,558.27 253, 052.30 53, 72705 0.22% 0.63% 0.37916 0.59% 0.43% 0.09% 146, 742.19 1,664,416.20 0.72% 8.13% 138, 226.13 245, 058.89 133, 056.55 57,545.80 (87, 701.16) 92, 965.26 1.29% 2.25% 1.20% 1.36910 -2.05% 2.22% 67,208.97 168,468.30 35,006.31 139,46735 0.27% 0.67916 0.14% 0.55% 56, 939.11 42,19727 48, 985.22 0.34% 0.36% 0.25% 413,507.51 1,825,998.80 417,482.13 2,293,927.68 1,289,733.43 335,144.88 0.19% 0.83% 0.19% 1.08% 0.59% 0.16% Fiscal Agent Account Portfolio (CFDs/SARDA) 32,893,578.12 36,S44,194.36 33,622,984.09 28,104,438.15 28,395,817.22 32,730,445.19 Note: * Includes $7,021,337 disbursement for Ca1PERS liability payment. November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 3 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 2.0 FUND ACTIVITY Fund Activity Summary Statements, 2 For Period Ending November 30, 2024 Beginning Ending Fund Fund Description Fund Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Balance 001 GENERAL 39,501,866.98 4,592,865.33 6,733,657.53 37,361,074.78 002 MEASURES 48,757,734.38 3,341,374.99 52,099,109.37 006 FIRE FACILITY ACQUISITION 5,156,301.08 - 5,156,301.08 100 STATE GAS TAX 590,824.48 257,380.83 848,205.31 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCT 4,639,882.98 283,820.79 4,923,703.77 103 STREET MAINTENANCE 6,770,334.03 - 6,770,334.03 105 NPDES 642,545.88 642,545.88 106 UPTOWN NEW STREETS IN LIEU FEE 1,414,874.00 - 1,414,874.00 110 COVID-19 PANDAMIC COMM. REINV. 9,529,580.94 - 22,123.88 9,507,457.06 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES 17,706,046.70 125,400.00 - 17,831,446.70 125 PEG -PUBLIC EDUC & GOVT 1,051,093.50 32,967.61 1,084,061.11 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT (379,199.03) - (260,272.57) (118,926.46) 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY MGT 645,281.52 645,281.52 150 ASSEMBLY BILL 2766 484,081.82 - 484,081.82 160 SUPPL LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 168,698.85 8,333.33 - 177,032.18 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 12,116,850.81 3,679.00 35,071.59 12,085,458.22 170 MEASURE A 8,827,857.14 293,604.93 - 9,121,462.07 190 TEMECULA COMM SVCS DISTRICT (765,469.91) 217,876.50 1,616,011.46 (2,163,604.87) 191 SL B-STREETLIGHT REPLACEMENT 1,396,833.34 - 1,396,833.34 192 SL B-STREETLIGHTS 404,677.71 - 404,677.71 194 SL D-REFUSERECYCLING 992,808.03 21,183.55 971,624.48 195 SL R-STREET MAINT 41,066.50 - - 41,066.50 196 SL L-LAKE PARK MAINT 300,114.84 390.00 11,073.38 289,431.46 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY 288,080.69 1,644.39 45,373.00 244,352.08 198 PUBLIC ART 283,517.07 456.32 - 283,973.39 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 5,532,425.20 1,589,315.04 2,405,137.01 4,716,603.23 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROV 233,412.12 233,412.12 277 CFD 03-2 RORIPAUGH RANCH IMPR 5,873,133.54 5,873,133.54 278 CFD 16-1 RORIPAUGH PH II IMPR 10,245,739.71 - 10,245,739.71 283 CFD 20-01 HEIRLOOM FARMS 1,929,957.05 32,358.39 - 1,962,315.44 300 INSURANCE 1,011,629.08 - 45,115.03 966,514.05 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 754,976.44 39,689.14 715,287.30 310 VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5,440,448.36 3,709.92 5,436,738.44 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 187,211.80 496,646.44 (309,434.64) 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT 4,914,136.82 - 4,914,136.82 330 SUPPORT SERVICES (49,856.36) 28,784.20 (78,640.56) 335 SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT 397,823.67 13,580.70 384,242.97 340 FACILITIES (412,700.26) 119,948.86 (532,649.12) 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT 4,180,196.60 - 4,180,196.60 380 SARDA DEBT SVC (34,123,988.07) (34,123,988.07) 381 RDA PROPERTY TAX TRUST FUND 1,009,900.16 1,009,900.16 382 2010-11 TABS REFUNDING ESCROW (212,813.40) (212,813.40) 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SVC _ _ 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON AB DEBT SVC 920,614.99 2,670.22 917,944.77 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SVC 1,093,188.70 3,935.22 1,089,253.48 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER DEBT SVC - _ - 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SVC 694,937.37 305.22 694,632.15 November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 4 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report Beginning Ending Fund Fund Description Fund Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Balance 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON2 DEBT SVC 429,345.72 2,675.72 426,670.00 477 CFD 03-2 RORIPAUGH DEVT SVC 964,965.84 2,755.22 962,210.62 478 CFD 16-1 RORIPAUGH PH II 4,367,170.09 6,191.62 4,360,978.47 479 CFD 19-01 MUNICIPAL SERVICES (778.78) 305.22 (1,084.00) 481 CFD 23-01 ALTAIR 1,851.75 4,235.41 (2,383.66) 482 CFD 23-02 PRADO (2,689.73) 1,980.72 (4,670.45) 483 CFD 20-01 HEIRLOOM FARMS 1,277,210.66 1,104.61 1,276,106.05 501 SL C ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 14,274.39 2,689.99 11,584.40 502 SL C ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 131,516.95 2,443.87 129,073.08 503 SL C ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 61,698.64 10,244.32 51,454.32 504 SL C ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 4,175.86 355.95 3,819.91 505 SL C ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 29,211.34 2,368.16 26,843.18 506 SL C ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 48,040.66 1,293.05 46,747.61 507 SL C ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 14,290.31 1,205.37 13,084.94 508 SL C ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 100,280.43 9,672.40 90,608.03 509 SL C ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 29,247.86 184.71 29,063.15 510 SL C ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 14,504.06 581.18 13,922.88 511 SL C ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3,882.71 170.44 3,712.27 512 SL C ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 73,664.51 16,094.79 57,569.72 513 SL C ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 30,246.54 2,442.57 27,803.97 514 SL C ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 10,773.65 1,219.85 9,553.80 515 SL C ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 15,311.74 584.41 14,727.33 516 SL C ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 83,430.74 5,833.33 77,597.41 517 SL C ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2,862.59 149.45 2,713.14 518 SL C ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 76,242.13 5,327.43 70,914.70 519 SL C ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 78,919.96 4,031.42 74,888.54 520 SL C ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 276,753.73 8,998.49 267,755.24 521 SL C ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 168,327.24 14,615.90 153,711.34 522 SL C ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 12,868.00 296.52 12,571.48 523 SL C ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 32,584.20 357.72 32,226.48 524 SL C ZONE 24 HARVESTON 9,210.06 9,878.55 (668.49) 525 SL C ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 84,784.65 2,510.04 82,274.61 526 SL C ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 2,516.14 313.42 2,202.72 527 SL C ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9,956.79 747.74 9,209.05 528 SL C ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 202,886.43 16,041.73 186,844.70 529 SL C ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 11,672.75 174.82 11,497.93 530 SL C ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 36,685.34 - 36,685.34 700 CERBT RETIREE HEALTH-GASB45 22,123,164.77 22,123,164.77 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION 4,195,118.20 4,195,118.20 Grand Total 205,212,836.77 10,781,467.45 11,523,819.92 204,470,484.30 Notes: s The amounts shown are preliminary and may not reflect adjusting journal entries. z Fund Balances fluctuate throughout the Fiscal Year and may temporarily have a negative balance due to the differences in timing of receipts, disbursements, interfund transfers, and journal entries. November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 5 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 3.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Investment Yields Yield, % 2-Year Treasury W Long-term Portfolio Nov Jul Jul 2022 2023 2024 Sources: City of Temecula; California State Treasurer's Office; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US) Long-term Portfolio Investments Investment Earnings, $ Interest Earned Gains/Losses 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 C Nov Jul July 2022 2023 2024 Sources: City of Temecula November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 6 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 4.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS 11/01/2024 CUSIP ID 31846V542 INTEREST EARNED FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z 48,185.38 11/04/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (48,185.38) 1112 //2024 3130ALEU4 MATURED F H L B DEB 1,000,000.00 11/25/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (1,000,291.67) 11/25/2024 3130ALEU4 INTEREST EARNED F H L B DEB 291.67 11/27/2024 3130AMNMO INTEREST EARNED F H L B DEB 5,250.00 11/27/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (5,250.00) November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 7 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 5.0 APPENDIX A - ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS PER STATE GOVERNMENT CODE (AS OF JANUARY 1, 2021)A APPLICABLE TO ALL LOCAL AGENCIESB INVESTMENT MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM QUALITY GOVERNMENT TYPE MATURITYc SPECIFIED % OF REQUIREMENTS CODE SECTIONS PORTFOLIO° Local Agency Bonds 5 years None None 53601(a) U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None None 53601(b) State Obligations— CA And Others 5 years None None 53601(d) CA Local Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(e) U.S Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(f) Bankers' Acceptances 180 days 40%E None 53601(g) 25% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Non -Pooled FundsP 270 days number rating by an 53601(h)(2)(C) agency's monies NRSRO" 40% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Pooled Funds' 270 days number rating by an 53635(a)(1) agency's monies NRSRO" Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30%J None 53601(i) Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years None None 53630 et seq. Placement Service Deposits 5 years 50%K None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Placement Service Certificates of Deposit 5 years 50%K None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Repurchase Agreements 1 year None None 53601(j) Reverse Repurchase Agreements and 20% of the base 92 days' value of the Nonem 53601(j) Securities Lending Agreements portfolio "A" rating category or Medium -Term Notes" 5 years 30% its equivalent or 53601(k) better Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual N/A 20%0 MultipleP-4 53601(1) and Funds 53601.6(b) Collateralized Bank Deposit0 5 years None None 53630 et seq. and 53601(n) "AA" rating category Mortgage Pass —Through Securities 5 years 20% or its equivalent or 53601(o) better County Pooled Investment Funds N/A None None 27133 Joint Powers Authority Pool N/A None Multiples 53601(p) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None None 16429.1 Voluntary Investment Program FuncIT N/A None None 16340 "AA" rating category Supranational Obligations 5 years 30% or its equivalent or 53601(q) better November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 8 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report TABLE OF NOTES A. Sources: Sections 16340, 16429.1, 27133, 53601, 53601.6, 53601.8, 53630 et seq., 53635, 53635.8, and 57603. B. Municipal Utilities Districts have the authority under the Public Utilities Code Section 12871 to invest in certain securities not addressed here. C. Section 53601 provides that the maximum term of any investment authorized under this section, unless otherwise stated, is five years. However, the legislative body may grant express authority to make investments either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body that exceeds this five-year remaining maturity limit. Such approval must be issued no less than three months prior to the purchase of any security exceeding the five-year maturity limit. D. Percentages apply to all portfolio investments regardless of source of funds. For instance, cash from a reverse repurchase agreement would be subject to the restrictions. E. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank. F. Includes agencies defined as a city, a district, or other local agency that do not pool money in deposits or investment with other local agencies, other than local agencies that have the same governing body. G. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. H. Issuing corporation must be organized and operating within the U.S., have assets in excess of $500 million, and debt other than commercial paper must be in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or higher by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or the issuing corporation must be organized within the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or LLC, has program wide credit enhancements, and has commercial paper that is rated "A-1" or higher, or the equivalent, by a nationally recognized statistical rating agency. I. Includes agencies defined as a county, a city and county, or other local agency that pools money in deposits or investments with other local agencies, including local agencies that have the same governing body. Local agencies that pool exclusively with other local agencies that have the same governing body must adhere to the limits set forth in Section 53601(h)(2)(C). J. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in negotiable certificates of deposit that are authorized under Section 53601(i). K. Effective January 1, 2020, no more than 50 percent of the agency's money may be invested in deposits, including certificates of deposit, through a placement service as authorized under 53601.8 (excludes negotiable certificates of deposit authorized under Section 53601(i)). On January 1, 2026, the maximum percentage of the portfolio reverts back to 30 percent. Investments made pursuant to 53635.8 remain subject to a maximum of 30 percent of the portfolio. L. Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may exceed the 92-day term if the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity dates of the same security. M. Reverse repurchase agreements must be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state -chartered bank that has a significant relationship with the local agency. The local agency must have held the securities used for the agreements for at least 30 days. N. "Medium -term notes" are defined in Section 53601 as "all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States." O. No more than 10 percent invested in any one mutual fund. This limitation does not apply to money market mutual funds. P. A mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized rating agencies or the fund must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Sections 53601 and 53635. Q. A money market mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations or retain an investment advisor registered with the SEC or exempt from registration and who has not less than five years' experience investing in money market instruments with assets under management in excess of $500 million. R. Investments in notes, bonds, or other obligations under Section 53601(n) require that collateral be placed into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, among other specific collateral requirements. S. A joint powers authority pool must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Section 53601, subdivisions (a) to (o). T. Local entities can deposit between $200 million and $10 billion into the Voluntary Investment Program Fund, upon approval by their governing bodies. Deposits in the fund will be invested in the Pooled Money Investment Account. U. Only those obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Inter -American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 9 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 6.0 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS Accrued Interest: Interest earned but not yet received. Active Deposits: Funds which are immediately required for disbursement. Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) which include Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Association (Farmer Mac). Amortization: An accounting practice of gradually decreasing (increasing) an asset's book value by spreading its depreciation (accretion) over a period of time. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR): The official annual financial report for the City. It includes five combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Ask Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to sell securities. Bankers' Acceptance (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. Basis Point: One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (0.01). Benchmark: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments. Bid Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to purchase securities. Bond: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows, including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment. Book Value: The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder's balance sheet. Book value is acquisition cost less amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Certificate of Deposit: A deposit insured up to $250,000 (current amount) by the FDIC at a set rate for a specified period of time. Collateral: Securities, evidence of deposit, or pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposit of public moneys. Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT): An average yield of a specific Treasury maturity sector for a specific time frame. This is a market index for reference of past direction of interest rates for the given Treasury maturity range. Coupon: The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. Credit Analysis: A critical review and appraisal of the economic and financial conditions or of the ability to meet debt obligations. Current Yield: The interest paid on an investment expressed as a percentage of the current price of the security. Custody: A banking service that provides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collect and pay out income, to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. Delivery vs. Payment (DVP): Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities. Discount: The difference between the cost of a security and its value at maturity when quoted at lower than face value. Diversification: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns and risk profiles. Duration: The weighted average maturity of a bond's cash flow stream, where the present value of the cash flows serve as the weights; the future point in time at which on average, an investor has received exactly half of the original investment, in present value terms; a bond's zero -coupon equivalent; the fulcrum of a bond's present value cash flow time line. Fannie Mae: Trade name for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Federal Reserve System: The central bank of the U.S. which consists of a seven -member Board of Governors, 12 regional banks, and 5,700 commercial banks that are members. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): Insurance provided to customers of a subscribing bank which guarantees deposits to a set limit (currently $250,000) per account. Fed Wire: A wire transmission service established by the Federal Reserve Bank to facilitate the transfer of funds through debits and credits of funds between participants within the Fed system. Freddie Mac: Trade name for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Ginnie Mae: Trade name for the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), a direct obligation bearing the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Inactive Deposits: Funds not immediately needed for disbursement. Interest Rate: The annual yield earned on an investment, expressed as a percentage. Investment Agreements: An agreement with a financial institution to borrow public funds subject to certain negotiated terms and conditions concerning collateral, liquidity and interest rates. Liquidity: Refers to the ability to rapidly convert an investment into cash. Market Value: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. Medium Term Notes: Corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. New Issue: Term used when a security is originally "brought" to market. November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 10 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report Perfected Delivery: Refers to an investment where the actual security or collateral is held by an independent third party representing the purchasing entity. Portfolio: Collection of securities held by an investor. Primary Dealer: A group of government securities dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and security positions held to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Purchase Date: The date in which a security is purchased for settlement on that or a later date. Rate of Return: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the current income return. Repurchase Agreement (REPO): A transaction where the seller (bank) agrees to buy back from the buyer (City) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Reverse Repurchase Agreement (REVERSE REPO): A transaction where the seller (City) agrees to buy back from the buyer (bank) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Risk: Degree of uncertainty of return on an asset. Safekeeping: see Custody. Sallie Mae: Trade name for the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Secondary Market: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. Settlement Date: The date on which a trade is cleared by delivery of securities against funds. Structured Notes: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative -based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. Supranationals: A supranational organization is formed by a group of countries through an international treaty with specific objectives such as promoting economic development. Supranational organizations also issue debt in the United States. The most commonly recognized supranational debt is the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank), International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Inter - American Development Bank (IADB). Treasury Bills: U.S. Treasury Bills which are short-term, direct obligations of the U.S. Government issued with original maturities of 13 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks; sold in minimum amounts of $10,000 in multiples of $5,000 above the minimum. Issued in book entry form only. T-bills are sold on a discount basis. Treasury Bonds: Long-term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. Treasury Notes: Medium -term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. U.S. Government Agencies: Instruments issued by various US Government Agencies most of which are secured only by the credit worthiness of the particular agency. Yield: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. It is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price of the security. Yield to Maturity: The rate of income return on an investment, minus any premium or plus any discount, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond, expressed as a percentage. Yield Curve: The yield on bonds, notes or bills of the same type and credit risk at a specific date for maturities up to thirty years. November 1, 2024 — November 30, 2024 Page 11 of 11 City of Temecula CALIFORNIA Aft a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Treasurer's Report December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY.....................................................................3 2.0 FUND ACTIVITY......................................................................................................................4 3.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO STATISTICS..................................................................6 4.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS...........................................................7 5.0 APPENDIX A - ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS.........................................................8 6.0 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS......................................................................................10 December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 2 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 1.0 CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY Cash and Investment Summary Trailing Six Month Period (Book Value Including Realized Gains/Losses) Julym August] September0 October0 November0 Decemberfl Cash and Investments Liquidity Portfolio US Bank (Demand Deposit Accounts) 43,420,408.50 20% 40,662,626.60 19% 45,182,073.41 21% 40,662,384.63 19% 48,514,430.19 23% 47,238,104.58 22% LocalAgency Investment Fund (LAIF) 82,750,992.59 38% 88,750,992.59 42% 88,750,992.59 41% 89,798,171.30 42% 79,798,171.30 37% 79,798,171.30 38% Petty Cash 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 O% 3,326.00 O% 3,326.00 O% 3,326.00 0% 3,326.00 0% Total Liquidity Portfolio 126,174,727.09 58% 129,416,945.19 61% 133,936,392.00 61% 130,463,881.93 60% 128,315,927.49 60% 127,039,601.88 60•% Long-term Portfolio (Investments) 58,141,756.45 27% 58,292,940.45 27% 58,639,498.72 27% 58,892,551.02 27% 58,946,278.07 28% 59,087,209.19 28% Trust Portfolio California Employers'Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) 20,472,093.57 9% 20,472,093.57 10% 22,136,509.77 10% 22,136,509.77 10% 22,136,509.77 10% 21,348,514.74 10% Public Agency Retirement Services Trust(PARS) 11,113,554.01 5% 4,225,273.56* 2% 4,282,819.36 2% 4,195,118.20 2% 4,288,083.46 2% 4,238,254.39 2% Total Trust Portfolio 31,585,647.58 15% 24,697,367.13 12% 26,419,329.13 12% 26,331,627.97 12% 26,424,593.23 12% 25,586,769.13 12% Total Cash and Investments 215,902,131.12 100% 212,407,252.77 100% 218,995,219.85 300% 215,688,060.92 100% 213,686,798.79 100% 211,713,580.20 300% Earnings on Cash and Investments LAI F Earnings (Quarterly) 1, 215, 529.97 1,047,178.71 % Change 1.08% 1.18% Long-term Portfolio (Monthly) 365,409.94 217,216.61 346,558.27 253,052.30 53,72705 140,931.12 % Change 0.63% 0.37% 0.59% 0.43% 0.09% 0.24% CERBT Earnings (Quarterly) 1,664,416.20 (787,995.03) % Change 8.13% -3.56% PARS Trust (Monthly) 245,058.89 133,056.55 57,545.80 (87,701.16) 92,965.26 (49,829.07) % Change 2.25% 1.20% 1.36% -2.05% 2.22% -1.16% Money Center ICS (Monthly) 67,208.97 168,468.30 35,006.31 139,467.35 120,400.95 % Change 0.27% 0.67% 0.14% 0.55% 0.47% Cash Sweep (Monthly) 56,939.11 42,19727 48,985.22 59,156.57 % Change 0.34% 0.36% 0.25% 0.32% Total Earnings on Cash and Investments 1,825,998.80 417,482.13 2,293,927.68 1,289,733.43 335,144.88 (517,335.46) %Change 0.83% 0.19% 1.08% 0.59% 0.16% -0.24% Fiscal Agent Account Portfolio (CFDs/SARDA) 36,544,194.36 33,622,984.09 28,104,438.15 28,395,817.22 32,730,445.19 28,459,054.92 Note: * Includes $7,021,337 disbursement for CaIPERS liability payment. December 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024 Page 3 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 2.0 FUND ACTIVITY Fund 001 002 006 100 102 103 105 106 110 120 125 140 145 150 160 165 170 190 191 192 194 195 196 197 198 210 275 277 278 283 300 305 310 320 325 330 335 340 350 380 381 382 460 472 473 474 475 Fund Activity Summary Statements, 2 For Period Ending December 31, 2024 Beginning Fund Description GENERAL MEASURES FIRE FACILITY ACQUISITION STATE GAS TAX RMRA-ROAD MAINT REHAB ACCT STREET MAINTENANCE NPDES UPTOWN NEW STREETS IN LIEU FEE COVID-19 PANDAMIC COMM. REINV. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES PEG -PUBLIC EDUC & GOVT COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY MGT ASSEMBLY BILL 2766 SUPPL LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS AFFORDABLE HOUSING MEASURE A TEMECULA COMM SVCS DISTRICT SL B-STREETLIGHT REPLACEMENT SL B-STREETLIGHTS SL D-REFUSERECYCLING SL R-STREET MAINT SL L-LAKE PARK MAINT TEMECULA LIBRARY PUBLIC ART CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROV CFD 03-2 RORIPAUGH RANCH IMPR CFD 16-1 RORIPAUGH PH II IMPR CFD 20-01 HEIRLOOM FARMS INSURANCE WORKERS' COMPENSATION VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT FACILITIES FACILITY REPLACEMENT SARDA DEBT SVC RDA PROPERTY TAX TRUST FUND 2010-11 TABS REFUNDING ESCROW CFD 88-12 DEBT SVC CFD 01-2 HARVESTON AB DEBT SVC CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SVC AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER DEBT SVC CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SVC Ending Fund Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Balance 37,517,064.39 8,102,852.70 6,217,880.85 39,402,036.24 52,099,109.37 3,745,986.83 55,845,096.20 5,156,301.08 41,803.72 5,198,104.80 848,205.31 295,939.62 1,144,144.93 4,923,703.77 257,783.72 5,181,487.49 6,770,334.03 54,832.29 - 6,825,166.32 642,545.88 4,525.13 243,465.69 403,605.32 1,414,874.00 11,465.24 - 1,426,339.24 9,507,457.06 77,154.64 7,858.12 9,576,753.58 17,831,446.70 337,421.80 - 18,168,868.50 1,084,061.11 8,757.27 - 1,092,818.38 (118,926.46) - 11,900.50 (130,826.96) 645,281.52 5,220.22 - 650,501.74 484,081.82 41,030.38 525,112.20 177,032.18 9,820.14 - 186,852.32 12,085,458.22 55,815.45 80,105.93 12,061,167.74 9,121,462.07 780,909.70 - 9,902,371.77 (2,193,202.72) 236,845.32 1,280,225.57 (3,236,582.97) 1,396,833.34 11,317.02 1,408,150.36 377,450.20 3,129.65 - 380,579.85 971,624.48 7,745.83 110,832.95 868,537.36 41,066.50 332.54 - 41,399.04 287,025.88 2,908.51 20,402.65 269,531.74 232,924.93 4,942.51 33,264.61 204,602.83 283,973.39 3,245.32 - 287,218.71 4,713,729.23 75,413.32 5,984,942.34 (1,195,799.79) 234,278.58 961.22 235,239.80 5,873,136.93 (89,804.46) 5,783,332.47 10,287,035.35 38,697.56 10,325,732.91 1,970,094.17 7,372.90 - 1,977,467.07 968,210.05 16,416.97 260,657.38 723,969.64 708,864.23 6,342.13 44,961.73 670,244.63 5,436,738.44 28,157.27 990.38 5,463,905.33 (322,617.10) 5.04 409,528.24 (732,140.30) 4,914,136.82 34,243.67 - 4,948,380.49 (78,640.56) 0.60 24,840.13 (103,480.09) 384,242.97 2,976.33 - 387,219.30 (576,687.43) - 83,066.80 (659,754.23) 4,180,196.60 31,138.31 - 4,211,334.91 (34,107,976.47) 4,285,377.91 4,265,621.88 (34,088,220.44) 1,009,900.16 7,457.37 4,265,621.88 (3,248,264.35) (212,813.40) - (212,813.40) 920,811.27 4,358.38 219.95 924,949.70 1,080,853.95 809.00 219.95 1,081,443.00 697,277.51 2,763.23 219.95 699,820.79 December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 4 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report Beginning Ending Fund Fund Description Fund Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Balance 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON2 DEBT SVC 423,492.64 481.86 219.95 423,754.55 477 CFD 03-2 RORIPAUGH DEVT SVC 966,010.64 3,695.34 219.95 969,486.03 478 CFD 16-1 RORIPAUGH PH II 4,378,376.52 17,739.61 768.14 4,395,347.99 479 CFD 19-01 MUNICIPAL SERVICES (1,084.00) - 219.95 (1,303.95) 481 CFD 23-01 ALTAIR (2,383.66) - 768.20 (3,151.86) 482 CFD 23-02 PRADO (4,670.45) 263.00 768.51 (5,175.96) 483 CFD 20-01 HEIRLOOM FARMS 1,281,133.40 4,922.86 3,148.42 1,282,907.84 484 CFD 25-01 ELDERBERRY PARK - 1,170.21 - 1,170.21 501 SL C ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 11,584.40 103.22 549.47 11,138.15 502 SL C ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 129,073.08 1,050.57 943.92 129,179.73 503 SL C ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 51,454.32 449.63 878.51 51,025.44 504 SL C ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 3,819.91 32.22 38.22 3,813.91 505 SL C ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 26,843.18 223.74 706.30 26,360.62 506 SL C ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 46,747.61 381.27 551.12 46,577.76 507 SL C ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 13,084.94 107.86 548.71 12,644.09 508 SL C ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 90,608.03 766.06 3,633.20 87,740.89 509 SL C ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 29,063.15 235.36 106.75 29,191.76 510 SL C ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 13,922.88 113.58 264.12 13,772.34 511 SL C ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3,712.27 30.26 85.25 3,657.28 512 SL C ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 57,569.72 521.28 3,386.42 54,704.58 513 SL C ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 27,803.97 226.90 1,336.09 26,694.78 514 SL C ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 9,553.80 78.59 743.35 8,889.04 515 SL C ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 14,727.33 121.14 148.11 14,700.36 516 SL C ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 77,597.41 649.36 417.66 77,829.11 517 SL C ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2,713.14 22.24 60.51 2,674.87 518 SL C ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 70,914.70 592.07 826.55 70,680.22 519 SL C ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 74,888.54 615.82 1,076.44 74,427.92 520 SL C ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 267,755.24 2,196.73 2,543.67 267,408.30 521 SL C ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 153,711.34 1,279.74 4,348.68 150,642.40 522 SL C ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 12,571.48 102.50 85.48 12,588.50 523 SL C ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 32,226.48 261.71 98.93 32,389.26 524 SL C ZONE 24 HARVESTON (668.49) 15.16 2,764.90 (3,418.23) 525 SL C ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 82,274.61 673.60 697.21 82,251.00 526 SL C ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 2,202.72 18.45 43.32 2,177.85 527 SL C ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9,209.05 75.73 315.50 8,969.28 528 SL C ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 186,844.70 1,532.01 5,528.10 182,848.61 529 SL C ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 11,497.93 93.67 57.68 11,533.92 530 SL C ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 36,685.34 299.00 - 36,984.34 700 CERBT RETIREE HEALTH-GASB45 22,123,164.77 (774,650.03) 21,348,514.74 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION 4,288,083.46 (49,829.07) 4,238,254.39 Grand Total 204,670,075.45 17,771,135.55 23,385,724.77 199,055,486.23 Notes: 'The amounts shown are preliminary and may not reflect adjusting journal entries. 2 Fund Balances fluctuate throughout the Fiscal Year and may temporarily have a negative balance due to the differences in timing of receipts, disbursements, interfund transfers, and journal entries. December 1, 2024 - December 31, 2024 Page 5 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 3.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO STATISTICS Investment Yields Yield, % 2-Year Treasury Long-term Portfolio Dec Jul Jul 2022 2023 2024 Sources: City of Temecula; California State Treasurer's Office; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US) Long-term Portfolio Investments Investment Earnings, $ ■ Interest Earned Gains/Losses 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Dec Jul July 2022 2023 2024 Sources: City of Temecula December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 6 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 4.0 LONG TERM INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO TRANSACTIONS 12/0 //2024 CUSIP ID 31846V542 INTEREST EARNED FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z 49,981.12 12/03/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (49,981.12) 12/10/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (7,500.00) 12/10/2024 3130AMM90 INTEREST EARNED F H L B DEB 7,500.00 12/12/2024 66815L2M0 INTEREST EARNED NORTHWESTERN M T N 73,500.00 12/12/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (73,500.00) 12/23/2024 3133EMK92 INTEREST EARNED F F C B DEB 2,900.00 12/23/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (2,900.00) 12/30/2024 3133EMP22 INTEREST EARNED F F C B DEB 4,550.00 12/30/2024 3134GXJL9 INTEREST EARNED F H L M C M T N 2,500.00 12/30/2024 31846V542 PURCHASED UNITS FIRST AM TREAS OB FD CL Z (7,050.00) December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 7 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 5.0 APPENDIX A - ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS ALLOWABLE INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS PER STATE GOVERNMENT CODE (AS OF JANUARY 1, 2021)A APPLICABLE TO ALL LOCAL AGENCIESB INVESTMENT MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MINIMUM QUALITY GOVERNMENT TYPE MATURITYc SPECIFIED % OF REQUIREMENTS CODE SECTIONS PORTFOLIO° Local Agency Bonds 5 years None None 53601(a) U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years None None 53601(b) State Obligations— CA And Others 5 years None None 53601(d) CA Local Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(e) U.S Agency Obligations 5 years None None 53601(f) Bankers' Acceptances 180 days 40%E None 53601(g) 25% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Non -Pooled FundsP 270 days number rating by an 53601(h)(2)(C) agency's monies NRSRO" 40% of the Highest letter and Commercial Paper— Pooled Funds' 270 days number rating by an 53635(a)(1) agency's monies NRSRO" Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years 30%J None 53601(i) Non-negotiable Certificates of Deposit 5 years None None 53630 et seq. Placement Service Deposits 5 years 50%K None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Placement Service Certificates of Deposit 5 years 50%K None 53601.8 and 53635.8 Repurchase Agreements 1 year None None 53601(j) Reverse Repurchase Agreements and 20% of the base 92 days' value of the Nonem 53601(j) Securities Lending Agreements portfolio "A" rating category or Medium -Term Notes" 5 years 30% its equivalent or 53601(k) better Mutual Funds and Money Market Mutual N/A 20%0 MultipleP-4 53601(1) and Funds 53601.6(b) Collateralized Bank Deposit0 5 years None None 53630 et seq. and 53601(n) "AA" rating category Mortgage Pass —Through Securities 5 years 20% or its equivalent or 53601(o) better County Pooled Investment Funds N/A None None 27133 Joint Powers Authority Pool N/A None Multiples 53601(p) Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A None None 16429.1 Voluntary Investment Program FuncIT N/A None None 16340 "AA" rating category Supranational Obligations 5 years 30% or its equivalent or 53601(q) better December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 8 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report TABLE OF NOTES A. Sources: Sections 16340, 16429.1, 27133, 53601, 53601.6, 53601.8, 53630 et seq., 53635, 53635.8, and 57603. B. Municipal Utilities Districts have the authority under the Public Utilities Code Section 12871 to invest in certain securities not addressed here. C. Section 53601 provides that the maximum term of any investment authorized under this section, unless otherwise stated, is five years. However, the legislative body may grant express authority to make investments either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body that exceeds this five-year remaining maturity limit. Such approval must be issued no less than three months prior to the purchase of any security exceeding the five-year maturity limit. D. Percentages apply to all portfolio investments regardless of source of funds. For instance, cash from a reverse repurchase agreement would be subject to the restrictions. E. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in bankers' acceptances of any one commercial bank. F. Includes agencies defined as a city, a district, or other local agency that do not pool money in deposits or investment with other local agencies, other than local agencies that have the same governing body. G. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. H. Issuing corporation must be organized and operating within the U.S., have assets in excess of $500 million, and debt other than commercial paper must be in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or higher by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization, or the issuing corporation must be organized within the U.S. as a special purpose corporation, trust, or LLC, has program wide credit enhancements, and has commercial paper that is rated "A-1" or higher, or the equivalent, by a nationally recognized statistical rating agency. I. Includes agencies defined as a county, a city and county, or other local agency that pools money in deposits or investments with other local agencies, including local agencies that have the same governing body. Local agencies that pool exclusively with other local agencies that have the same governing body must adhere to the limits set forth in Section 53601(h)(2)(C). J. No more than 30 percent of the agency's money may be in negotiable certificates of deposit that are authorized under Section 53601(i). K. Effective January 1, 2020, no more than 50 percent of the agency's money may be invested in deposits, including certificates of deposit, through a placement service as authorized under 53601.8 (excludes negotiable certificates of deposit authorized under Section 53601(i)). On January 1, 2026, the maximum percentage of the portfolio reverts back to 30 percent. Investments made pursuant to 53635.8 remain subject to a maximum of 30 percent of the portfolio. L. Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may exceed the 92-day term if the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity dates of the same security. M. Reverse repurchase agreements must be made with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state -chartered bank that has a significant relationship with the local agency. The local agency must have held the securities used for the agreements for at least 30 days. N. "Medium -term notes" are defined in Section 53601 as "all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States." O. No more than 10 percent invested in any one mutual fund. This limitation does not apply to money market mutual funds. P. A mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized rating agencies or the fund must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Sections 53601 and 53635. Q. A money market mutual fund must receive the highest ranking by not less than two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations or retain an investment advisor registered with the SEC or exempt from registration and who has not less than five years' experience investing in money market instruments with assets under management in excess of $500 million. R. Investments in notes, bonds, or other obligations under Section 53601(n) require that collateral be placed into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, among other specific collateral requirements. S. A joint powers authority pool must retain an investment advisor who is registered with the SEC (or exempt from registration), has assets under management in excess of $500 million, and has at least five years' experience investing in instruments authorized by Section 53601, subdivisions (a) to (o). T. Local entities can deposit between $200 million and $10 billion into the Voluntary Investment Program Fund, upon approval by their governing bodies. Deposits in the fund will be invested in the Pooled Money Investment Account. U. Only those obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), International Finance Corporation (IFC), and Inter -American Development Bank (IADB), with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less. December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 9 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report 6.0 APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY OF TERMS Accrued Interest: Interest earned but not yet received. Active Deposits: Funds which are immediately required for disbursement. Agencies: Federal agency securities and/or Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) which include Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB), Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB), and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Association (Farmer Mac). Amortization: An accounting practice of gradually decreasing (increasing) an asset's book value by spreading its depreciation (accretion) over a period of time. Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR): The official annual financial report for the City. It includes five combined statements and basic financial statements for each individual fund and account group prepared in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Ask Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to sell securities. Bankers' Acceptance (BA): A draft or bill or exchange accepted by a bank or trust company. The accepting institution guarantees payment of the bill, as well as the issuer. Basis Point: One basis point is one hundredth of one percent (0.01). Benchmark: A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio's investments. Bid Price: The price a broker/dealer offers to purchase securities. Bond: A financial obligation for which the issuer promises to pay the bondholder a specified stream of future cash flows, including periodic interest payments and a principal repayment. Book Value: The value at which a debt security is shown on the holder's balance sheet. Book value is acquisition cost less amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Certificate of Deposit: A deposit insured up to $250,000 (current amount) by the FDIC at a set rate for a specified period of time. Collateral: Securities, evidence of deposit, or pledges to secure repayment of a loan. Also refers to securities pledged by a bank to secure deposit of public moneys. Constant Maturity Treasury (CMT): An average yield of a specific Treasury maturity sector for a specific time frame. This is a market index for reference of past direction of interest rates for the given Treasury maturity range. Coupon: The annual rate of interest that a bond's issuer promises to pay the bondholder on the bond's face value. Credit Analysis: A critical review and appraisal of the economic and financial conditions or of the ability to meet debt obligations. Current Yield: The interest paid on an investment expressed as a percentage of the current price of the security. Custody: A banking service that provides safekeeping for the individual securities in a customer's investment portfolio under a written agreement which also calls for the bank to collect and pay out income, to buy, sell, receive and deliver securities when ordered to do so by the principal. Delivery vs. Payment (DVP): Delivery of securities with a simultaneous exchange of money for the securities. Discount: The difference between the cost of a security and its value at maturity when quoted at lower than face value. Diversification: Dividing investment funds among a variety of securities offering independent returns and risk profiles. Duration: The weighted average maturity of a bond's cash flow stream, where the present value of the cash flows serve as the weights; the future point in time at which on average, an investor has received exactly half of the original investment, in present value terms; a bond's zero -coupon equivalent; the fulcrum of a bond's present value cash flow time line. Fannie Mae: Trade name for the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Federal Reserve System: The central bank of the U.S. which consists of a seven -member Board of Governors, 12 regional banks, and 5,700 commercial banks that are members. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC): Insurance provided to customers of a subscribing bank which guarantees deposits to a set limit (currently $250,000) per account. Fed Wire: A wire transmission service established by the Federal Reserve Bank to facilitate the transfer of funds through debits and credits of funds between participants within the Fed system. Freddie Mac: Trade name for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Ginnie Mae: Trade name for the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), a direct obligation bearing the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Inactive Deposits: Funds not immediately needed for disbursement. Interest Rate: The annual yield earned on an investment, expressed as a percentage. Investment Agreements: An agreement with a financial institution to borrow public funds subject to certain negotiated terms and conditions concerning collateral, liquidity and interest rates. Liquidity: Refers to the ability to rapidly convert an investment into cash. Market Value: The price at which a security is trading and could presumably be purchased or sold. Maturity: The date upon which the principal or stated value of an investment becomes due and payable. Medium Term Notes: Corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. New Issue: Term used when a security is originally "brought" to market. December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 10 of 11 City of Temecula Treasurer's Report Perfected Delivery: Refers to an investment where the actual security or collateral is held by an independent third party representing the purchasing entity. Portfolio: Collection of securities held by an investor. Primary Dealer: A group of government securities dealers that submit daily reports of market activity and security positions held to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and are subject to its informal oversight. Purchase Date: The date in which a security is purchased for settlement on that or a later date. Rate of Return: The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond or the current income return. Repurchase Agreement (REPO): A transaction where the seller (bank) agrees to buy back from the buyer (City) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Reverse Repurchase Agreement (REVERSE REPO): A transaction where the seller (City) agrees to buy back from the buyer (bank) the securities at an agreed upon price after a stated period of time. Risk: Degree of uncertainty of return on an asset. Safekeeping: see Custody. Sallie Mae: Trade name for the Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA), a U.S. sponsored corporation. Secondary Market: A market made for the purchase and sale of outstanding issues following the initial distribution. Settlement Date: The date on which a trade is cleared by delivery of securities against funds. Structured Notes: Notes issued by Government Sponsored Enterprises (FHLB, FNMA, FHLMC, etc.) and Corporations, which have imbedded options (e.g., call features, step-up coupons, floating rate coupons, derivative -based returns) into their debt structure. Their market performance is impacted by the fluctuation of interest rates, the volatility of the imbedded options and shifts in the shape of the yield curve. Supranationals: A supranational organization is formed by a group of countries through an international treaty with specific objectives such as promoting economic development. Supranational organizations also issue debt in the United States. The most commonly recognized supranational debt is the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD or World Bank), International Finance Corporation (IFC) and Inter - American Development Bank (IADB). Treasury Bills: U.S. Treasury Bills which are short-term, direct obligations of the U.S. Government issued with original maturities of 13 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks; sold in minimum amounts of $10,000 in multiples of $5,000 above the minimum. Issued in book entry form only. T-bills are sold on a discount basis. Treasury Bonds: Long-term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities of more than 10 years. Treasury Notes: Medium -term coupon -bearing U.S. Treasury securities issued as direct obligations of the U.S. Government and having initial maturities from two to 10 years. U.S. Government Agencies: Instruments issued by various US Government Agencies most of which are secured only by the credit worthiness of the particular agency. Yield: The rate of annual income return on an investment, expressed as a percentage. It is obtained by dividing the current dollar income by the current market price of the security. Yield to Maturity: The rate of income return on an investment, minus any premium or plus any discount, with the adjustment spread over the period from the date of purchase to the date of maturity of the bond, expressed as a percentage. Yield Curve: The yield on bonds, notes or bills of the same type and credit risk at a specific date for maturities up to thirty years. December 1, 2024 — December 31, 2024 Page 11 of 11 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Isaac Garibay, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Increase of Excess Liability Insurance Policy with Arch Specialty and Acceptance Casualty Insurance Companies PREPARED BY: Nicole Flores, Risk Manager RECOMMENDATIONS: That the City Council approve the increase of the City's excess liability insurance policy and additional premiums: Excess Liability ($5M excess $15M Limit) insurance with Arch Specialty Insurance Company, in the prorated amount of $67,843.95, for the period of February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025; and 2. Excess Liability ($5M excess $20M Limit) insurance with Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company, in the prorated amount of $44,085.72 for the period of February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025; and BACKGROUND: Staff requested that the City's insurance broker, Alliant Insurance Services (AIS) market the City's Excess Liability Insurance to increase existing limits from $15 million to $25 million, which is the standard limits of similar -sized cities. In response, AIS obtained proposals from two insurance companies. To ensure the insurance companies have sufficient financial capacity to provide the necessary policy limits to ensure the City's risks, AIS utilized the services of A.M. Best Rating system to assess their financial strength and creditworthiness. The insurance premiums are listed below: Excess Liability Insurance ($5M excess $15M Limit) Arch Specialty Insurance COmDanv Carrier I I Premium Arch Specialty Insurance Company I A+ (Superior), FSC: XV (Greater than $213) 1 $67,843.95 The premium amount of $67,843.95 for Excess Liability Insurance coverage is an increase in premium to add an additional $5 million in limits to the $15 million already purchased. Excess Liability Insurance ($5M excess $20M Limit) Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company Carrier Premium Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company A- (Excellent), FSC: XI ($750M to $113) $44,085.72 The premium amount of $44,085.72 for Excess Liability Insurance coverage is an increase in premium to add an additional $5 million in limits to the $20 million already purchased. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal impact, additional insurance premiums fall into current budget amounts for the Fiscal Year 2024-25. ATTACHMENTS: Insurance Proposal Prepared for City of Temecula. Excess Liability Insurance Proposal Presented by Conor Boughey, Senior Vice President Thomas Joyce, Assistant Vice President Date Presented January 23, 2025 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. 560 Mission Street, 6th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 O 415 403 1400 F 000 000 0000 CA License No. OC36861 www.alliant.com Table of Contents CompanyProfile............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 YourService Team........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 NamedInsured............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ExcessLiability Coverage................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 ExcessLiability Coverage (cont.)..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 ExcessLiability Coverage (cont.)..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 ExcessLiability Coverage (cont.)..................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Disclosures..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 NYRegulation 194.................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Privacy....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 FATCA:....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 NR RA:........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 GuaranteeFunds...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 ClaimsReporting: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 ClaimsMade Policy: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Changesand Developments................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Certificates/ Evidence of Insurance...................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Requestto Bind Coverage........................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 1 Company Profile Alliant provides risk management, insurance, and consulting services to thousands of clients nationwide, delivering tailored products and services engineered to mitigate risk, improve performance, and promote long-term growth. Our core business includes property and casualty insurance services, middle -market brokerage, employee benefits, and underwriting, each staffed with dedicated industry specialists who understand the unique market dynamics facing their clients. In addition to our 90-plus year legacy of service and results, Alliant is one of the industry's fastest -growing organizations. As America's 10th largest insurance brokerage, we have an active presence in every U.S. market and an extensive arsenal of best -in -class resources and intelligence that moves our clients forward in today's competitive market climate. Alliant has a broad reach that covers a wide range of industries, including: ■ Agriculture ■ Aviation ■ Construction ■ Energy and Marine ■ Environmental ■ Healthcare ■ Financial Institutions ■ Law ■ Public Entity ■ Real Estate ■ Tribal Nations ■ And many more Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 2 Your Service Team cboughey@aL[iant.com Phone: 415 744 4889 thomas.joyce@alliant.com Phone: 415 403 1417 dhardwick@aLLiant.com Phone: 949 660 8118 moriah.Lowe@a[Liant.com Phone: 628 279 0307 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 3 Named Insured Temecula Community Services District Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency Temecula Public Financing Authority Temecula Housing Authority NAMED INSURED DISCLOSURE Name Insured(s) should match State of Incorporation filing. Inform Alliant if there is a difference or change The First Named Insured policy status granted includes certain rights and responsibilities. These responsibilities do not apply to other Named Insureds on the policy. Some examples for First Named Insured status include; (1) being designated to act on behalf of all insureds for making policy changes, (2) receiving of correspondence, (3) distributing claim proceeds, and (4) making premium payments Are ALL entities listed as named insureds? Coverage is not automatically afforded to all entities unless specifically named. Confirm with your producer and service team that all entities to be protected are on the correct policy. Not all entities may be listed on all policies based on coverage line. Additional named insured is (1) A person or organization, other than the first named insured, identified as an insured in the policy declarations or an addendum to the policy declarations. (2) A person or organization added to a policy after the policy is written with the status of named insured. This entity would have the same rights and responsibilities as an entity named as an insured in the policy declarations (other than those rights and responsibilities reserved to the first named insured). • Applies to Professional Liability, Pollution Liability, Directors & Officers Liability, Employment Practices Liability, Fiduciary Liability policies (this list not all inclusive). Check your Policy Language for applicability. These policies provide protection to the Named Insured for claims made against it alleging a covered wrongful act. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 4 Excess Liability Coverage Proposed Coverage Proposed Limit: $5,000,000 xs $15,000,000 = $20,0009000 Insurance Company Arch Specialty Insurance Company A.M. Best Rating A+ (Superior), XV (Greater than or Equal to $213) Standard & Poor's Rating Not Rated California Status Non -Admitted Policy/Coverage Term February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025 Coverage Excess Liability Limits Excess Liability $ 5,000,000 Per Occurrence $ 5,000,000 General Aggregate Proposed Limit: $5,000,000 xs $20,000,000 = $25,000,000 Insurance Company Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company A.M. Best Rating A- (Excellent), XI ($750M to $1 B) Standard & Poor's Rating Not Rated California Status Non -Admitted Policy/Coverage Term February 1, 2025 to July 1, 2025 Coverage Excess Liability Limits Excess Liability $ 5,000,000 Per Occurrence $ 5,000,000 General Aggregate Schedule of Underlying Coverage 2"d Layer Excess Liability ($5, 000, 000 xs $10, 000, 000 = $15, 000, 000) Company StarStone Specialty Insurance Company Policy Period 07/01 /2024 - 07/01 /2025 Excess Liability $ 5,000,000 Per Occurrence $ 5,000,000 General Aggregate 15t Layer General Liability ($10,000,000) Company Great American E&S Ins. Co Starstone Specialty Ins. Co Policy Period 07/01 /2024 - 07/01 /2025 General Liability $ 10,000,000 Each Occurrence $ 40,000,000 Aggregate $ 500,000 Self Insured Retention $ 10,000,000 Completed Operations Hazard Annual Aggregate Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 5 Excess Liability Coverage (cont.) Proposed Coverage Nose Coverage 7/1 /2022 Defense Inside/Outside the Per Underlying Limit Who has the Duty to Defend Insurer Endorsement & Exclusions Arch Specialty Insurance Company (including but not limited to) 0 Excess Third Party Liability Policy Declarations (ASIC) ■ Excess Third Party Liability Policy Schedule A— Schedule Of Underlying Insurance (Excess) ■ Commercial Excess Third Party Liability Policy Schedule Of Endorsements. - Arch Specialty • Claims Handling Procedures ■ Excess Third Party Liability Policy ■ U.S. Treasury Department's Office Of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC") ■ Signature Page (Arch Specialty) ■ Service of Suit ■ Excess/Umbrella Policy Underlying Insurance Notice ■ Lead Hazard Exclusion ■ Silica Exclusion • Fungi and Bacteria Hazard Exclusion ■ Unimpaired Underlying Aggregate Limit Endorsement ■ Anti -Stacking Endorsement ■ Amendment Of Limits of Insurance (Public Entities) - $5,000,000 Each Occurrence/ $5,000,000 Aggregate Where Applicable / Item (C): N/A ■ Communicable Disease Exclusion ■ Advisory Notice to Policyholders Excess Follow Form ■ Endorsements Addressing Cyber and Data Privacy ■ Exclusion —violation of Law Addressing Data Privacy ■ Exclusion —Access or Disclosure of Confidential or Personal Material or Information ■ Exclusion — Electronic Data ■ Exclusion — Cyber Incident ■ Advisory Notice to Policyholders Exclusion — Perfluoroalkyl And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PfAS) ■ Exclusion — Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) ■ California Important Notice ■ Terrorism Coverage Disclosure Notice ■ Total Terrorism Exclusion (If Terrorism Is Rejected) ■ Exclusion Of Terrorism Other Than a Certified Act Of Terrorism (If Terrorism Is Accepted) Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company ■ Commercial Lines Policy Jacket ■ Notice Of Privacy Policy ■ California Premium Refund Disclosure Notice Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 6 Excess Liability Coverage (cont.) Proposed Coverage Endorsement & Exclusions 0 Schedule Of Forms and Endorsements (cont.) 0 Commercial Excess Liability Declarations (including but not limited to) 0 Commercial Excess Liability Schedule of Controlling Underlying Insurance ■ California Important Notice ■ Commercial Excess Liability Coverage Form ■ Nuclear Energy Liability Exclusion Endorsement ■ Exclusion - Fungi or Bacteria ■ Exclusion - Silica or Silica -Related Dust ■ Exclusion - Communicable Disease ■ Exclusion Of Other Acts of Terrorism Committed Outside the United States; Cap On Losses From Certified Acts Of Terrorism ■ Exclusion Of Punitive Damages Related to A Certified Act of Terrorism ■ Exclusion - Access or Disclosure of Confidential or Personal Material or Information ■ Auto Coverage - Exclusion of Terrorism ■ Exclusion - Unmanned Aircraft ■ Exhaustion Of Retained Limit ■ Exclusion — Cyber Incident ■ Punitive Or Exemplary Damages Follow Form ■ Drop -Down Limitation Endorsement ■ Underlying Cancellation Endorsement ■ Toxic Substances Exclusion ■ Asbestos Exclusion ■ Lead Exclusion ■ Perfluoroalkyl And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exclusion ■ Watercraft Exclusion ■ Employees' Retirement Income Security Act (E.R.I.S.A.) Exclusion ■ Cyber Liability and Data Exclusion ■ Total Pollution Exclusion ■ Cross Suits Exclusion - Named Insured ■ Common Policy Conditions ■ Continuous Or Progressive Injury or Damage Exclusion ■ Non -Stacking of Limits Endorsement ■ Minimum Earned Premium Endorsement ■ Service Of Suit Endorsement ■ Notice Of Disclosure for Agent Broker & Managing General Agency Compensation ■ Claim Reporting Policyholder Notice ■ Terrorism Coverage Notice ■ U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Advisory Notice To Policyholders Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 7 Excess Liability Coverage (cont.) Proposed Coverage Proposed Limit: $5,000,000 xs $15,000,000 = $20,000,000 Arch Specialty Insurance Company Total Cost Excluding TRIA $ 67,843.95 Policy Premium $ 65,753.00 CA Surplus Lines Tax (3%) $ 1,972.59 CA Stamping Fee (0.18%) $ 118.36 Total Cost Including TRIA $ 69,391.65 Minimum Earned Premium $ 16,813.25 Proposed Limit: $5,000,000 xs $20,000,000 = $25,000,000 Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company Total Cost Including TRIA $ 44,085.72 Policy Premium $ 42,727.00 CA Surplus Lines Tax (3%) $ 1,281.81 CA Stamping Fee (0.18%) $ 76.91 Minimum Earned Premium $ 10,681.75 Total Limit: $25,000,000 Total Premium excluding TRIA $ 111,929.67 Total Premium including TRIA $ 113,477.37 Subjectivities Written Request to Bind TRIA form signed - if rejected (Arch) TRIA decision to reject in writing (Acceptance) Signed D1 forms Quote valid Until February 1, 2025 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 8 Disclosures This proposal of insurance is provided as a matter of convenience and information only. Atli nformation included in this proposal, including but not limited to personal and real property values, locations, operations, products, data, automobile schedules, financial data and loss experience, is based on facts and representations supplied to Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. by you. This proposal does not reflect any independent study or investigation by Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. or its agents and employees. Please be advised that this proposal is also expressly conditioned on there being no material change in the risk between the date of this proposal and the inception date of the proposed policy (including the occurrence of any claim or notice of circumstances that may give rise to a claim under any policy which the policy being proposed is a renewal or replacement). In the event of such change of risk, the insurer may, at its sole discretion, modify, or withdraw this proposal, whether or not this offer has already been accepted. This proposal is not confirmation of insurance and does not add to, extend, amend, change, or alter any coverage in any actual policy of insurance you may have. All existing policy terms, conditions, exclusions, and limitations apply. For specific information regarding your insurance coverage, please refer to the policy itself. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. will not be liable for any claims arising from or related to information included in or omitted from this proposal of insurance. Alliant embraces a policy of transparency with respect to its compensation from insurance transactions. Details on our compensation policy, including the types of income that Alliant may earn on a placement, are available on our website at www.alliant.com. For a copy of our policy or for any inquiries regarding compensation issues pertaining to your account you may also contact us at: Alliant Insurance Services, Inc., Attention: General Counsel, 701 B Street, 6th Floor, San Diego, CA 92101. Analyzing insurers' over-all performance and financial strength is a task that requires specialized skills and in- depth technical understanding of all aspects of insurance company finances and operations. Insurance brokerages such as Alliant Insurance typically rely upon rating agencies for this type of market analysis. Both A.M. Best and Standard and Poor's have been industry leaders in this area for many decades, utilizing a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis of the information available in formulating their ratings. A.M. Best has an extensive database of nearly 6,000 Life/Health, Property Casualty and International companies. You can visit them at www.ambest.com. For additional information regarding insurer financial strength ratings visit Standard and Poor's website at www.standardandpoors.com. Our goal is to procure insurance for you with underwriters possessing the financial strength to perform. Alliant does not, however, guarantee the solvency of any underwriters with which insurance or reinsurance is placed and maintains no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the financial failure or insolvency of any insurer. We encourage you to review the publicly available information collected to enable you to make an informed decision to accept or reject a particular underwriter. To learn more about companies doing business in your state, visit the Department of Insurance website for that state. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 9 NY Regulation 194 Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. is an insurance producer licensed by the State of New York. Insurance producers are authorized by their license to confer with insurance purchasers about the benefits, terms and conditions of insurance contracts; to offer advice concerning the substantive benefits of particular insurance contracts; to sell insurance; and to obtain insurance for purchasers. The role of the producer in any particular transaction typically involves one or more of these activities. Compensation will be paid to the producer, based on the insurance contract the producer sells. Depending on the insurer(s) and insurance contract(s) the purchaser selects, compensation will be paid by the insurer(s) selling the insurance contract or by another third party. Such compensation may vary depending on a number of factors, including the insurance contract(s) and the insurer(s) the purchaser selects. In some cases, other factors such as the volume of business a producer provides to an insurer or the profitability of insurance contracts a producer provides to an insurer also may affect compensation. The insurance purchaser may obtain information about compensation expected to be received bythe producer based in whole or in part on the sale of insurance to the purchaser, and (if applicable) compensation expected to be received based in whole or in part on any alternative quotes presented to the purchaser by the producer, by requesting such information from the producer. Privacy At Alliant, one of our top priorities is making sure that the information we have about you is protected and secure. We value our relationship with you and work hard to preserve your privacy and ensure that your preferences are honored. At the same time, the very nature of our relationship may result in Alliant's collecting or sharing certain types of information about you in order to provide the products and services you expect from us. Please take the time to read our full Privacy Policy posted at www.altiant.com, and contact your Alliant service team should you have any questions. Other Disclosures / Disclaimers FATCA: The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) requires the notification of certain financial accounts to the United States Internal Revenue Service. Alliant does not provide tax advice so please contact your tax consultant for your obligation regarding FATCA. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 10 Other Disclosures / Disclaimers - Continued N R RA: The Non -Admitted and Reinsurance Reform Act (NRRA) went into effect on July 21, 2011. Accordingly, surplus lines tax rates and regulations are subject to change which could result in an increase or decrease of the total surplus lines taxes and/or fees owed on this placement. If a change is required, we will promptly notify you. Any additional taxes and/or fees must be promptly remitted to Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. Guarantee Funds Established by law in every state, guarantyfunds are maintained by a state's insurance commissionerto protect policyholders in the event that an insurer becomes insolvent or is unable to meet its financial obligations. If your insurance carrier is identified as `Non -Admitted', your policy is not protected by your state's Guaranty Fund. Claims Reporting: Your policy will come with specific claim reporting requirements. Please make sure you understand these obligations. Contact your Alliant Service Team with any questions. Claims Made Policy: This claims -made policy contains a requirement stating that this policy applies only to any claim first made against the Insured and reported to the insurer duringthe policy period or applicable extended reporting period. Claims must be submitted to the insurer during the policy period, or applicable extended reporting period, as required pursuant to the Claims/Loss Notification Clause within the policy in order for coverage to apply. Late reporting or failure to report pursuant to the policy's requirements could result in a disclaimer of coverage by the insurer. Any Employment Practices Liability (EPL) or Directors & Officers (D&O) with EPL coverage must give notice to the insurer of any charges / complaints brought by any state /federal agency (i.e. EEOC and similar proceedings) involving an employee. To preserve your rights under the policy, it is important that timely notice be given to the insurer, whether or not a right to sue letter has been issued. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 11 Other Disclosures / Disclaimers - Continued Changes and Developments It is important that we be advised of any changes in your operations, which may have a bearing on the validity and/or adequacy of your insurance. The types of changes that concern us include, but are not limited to, those Listed below: ■ Changes in any operations such as expansion to another state, new products, or new applications of existing products. ■ Travel to any state not previously disclosed. ■ Permanent operations outside the United States, Canada or Puerto Rico. ■ Mergers and/or acquisition of new companies and any change in business ownership, including percentages. ■ Any newly assumed contractual liability, granting of indemnities or hold harmless agreements. ■ Any changes in existing premises including vacancy, whether temporary or permanent, alterations, demolition, etc. Also, any new premises either purchased, constructed or occupied ■ Circumstances which may require an increased liability insurance limit. ■ Any changes in fire or theft protection such as the installation of or disconnection of sprinkler systems, burglar alarms, etc. This includes any alterations to the system. ■ Immediate notification of any changes to a scheduled of equipment, property, vehicles, electronic data processing, etc. ■ Property of yours that is in transit, unless previously discussed and/or currently insured. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 12 Other Disclosures / Disclaimers - Continued Certificates / Evidence of Insurance A Certificate or Evidence is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. The certificate does not affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by a policy, nor does it constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative, producer or recipient. You may have signed contracts, leases or other agreements requiring you to provide this evidence. In those agreements, you may assume obligations and/or liability for others (Indemnification, Hold Harmless) and some of the obligations that are not covered by insurance. We recommend that you and your legal counsel review these documents. In addition to providing a Certificate or Evident of Insurance, you may be required to name your landlord, client or customer on your policy as a loss payee on property insurance or as an additional insured on liability insurance. This is only possible with permission of the insurance company, added by endorsement and, in some cases, an additional premium. By naming the certificate holder as additional insured, there are consequences to your risks and insurance policy including: ■ Your policy limits are now shared with other entities; their claims involvement may reduce or exhaust your aggregate limit. ■ Your policy may provide higher limits than required by contract; your full limits can be exposed to the additional insured. ■ There may be conflicts in defense when your insurer has to defend both you and the additional insured. ■ An additional insured endorsement will most likely not provide notification of cancellation. Some insurance companies use a "blanket" additional insured endorsement that provides coverage automatically when it is required in a written contract. Most insurance companies do not want to be notified of all additional insureds when there is a blanket endorsement on the policy. If a notice of cancellation is required for the additional insured party, you must notify us immediately and we will request an endorsement from your insurance company. There may be an additional premium for adding a notice of cancellation endorsement for an additional insured. See Request to Bind Coverage page for acknowledgement of all disclaimers and disclosures. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 13 Request to Bind Coverage City of Temecula We have reviewed the proposal and agree to the terms and conditions of the coverages presented. We are requesting coverage to be bound as outlined by coverage line below: Excess Liability— $5,000,000 xs $15,000,00 = $20,000,000 V Excess Liability— $5,000,000 xs $20,000,000 = $25,000,000 V This Authorization to Bind Coverage also acknowledges receipt and review of all disclaimers and disclosures, including exposures used to develop insurance terms, contained within this proposal. r 01 /24/2025 Signature of Authorized Insured Representative Date Risk Manager Title Nicole Flores Printed / Typed Name This proposal does not constitute a binder of insurance. Binding is subject to the final carrier approval. The actual terms and conditions of the policy will prevail. Alliant Insurance Services, Inc. I www.alliant.com I CA License No. OC36861 Page 14 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Willdan Engineering for the Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project, PW23-04 PREPARED BY: Nino Abad, Senior Civil Engineer Kellen Freeman, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a consultant agreement with Willdan Engineering in the amount of $290,034, for the Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project, PW23-04; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $29,003.40, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: The Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project, PW23-04, includes the design of raised medians that include landscaping and irrigation to enhance traffic safety and improve the beauty of the main corridor into wine country. In addition, the missing sidewalk, curb and gutter, and a portion of the #2 lane of Westbound Rancho California between Riesling Court and Promenade Chardonnay Hills will be designed to comply with the circulation element of the City's general plan. On August 16, 2024, the Department of Public Works publicly posted on the City's online bidding service, Planet Bids, Request for Proposal No. 284 to solicit design consultant proposals for the Project. The design consultant solicitation was publicly advertised between August 16, 2024, and September 9, 2024, and the City received nine (9) proposals. City staff panel members reviewed each proponent's proposal. After panel review and discussion of proposals, City staff ranked the proponents as follows: 1. Willdan Engineering 2. TAIT & Associates, Inc. 3. TKE Engineering, Inc. 4. Dokken Engineering 5. SB&O, Inc. 6. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. 7. Westland Group, Inc. 8. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 9. PSOMAS Staff determined that Willdan Engineering is the most qualified consultant. Willdan Engineering provides civil engineering, planning, and construction services to public clients throughout California. Willdan Engineering has successfully designed numerous raised landscaped medians and other street beautification projects throughout California. Staff has negotiated a scope of work and an equitable fee with Willdan Engineer for their Consultant Services. FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho California Road Median Improvements Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2025-2029. It is funded with Developer Contributions, DIF-Street Improvements, and Measure S. Adequate funds are available in the project account for the engineering design services agreement in the amount of $290,034, plus the $29,003.40 contingency, for a total encumbrance of $319,037.40. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement 2. Project Description 3. Project Location AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND WILLDAN ENGINEERING RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. PW23-04 (RFP NO. 284) THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of February 11, 2025, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Willdan Engineering, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 11, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each fiscal year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Core Based Statistical Area using the most recently published month annual percentage change. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or 06/04/2024 service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 5. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal andfor time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html 6. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Two Hundred Ninety Thousand Thirty -Four Dollars and Zero Cents ($290,034.00) for the total term of this agreement b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The Director of Public Works may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 8. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 06/0412024 C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant. 10. INDEMNIFICATION a. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively "Indemnitees"), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub -consultants, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8. b. Other Indemnities. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. 1) Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Concessionaire has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 06/04/2024 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. By executing this Agreement, Vendor is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in aggregate. Professional Liability insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. a. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager. b. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant's products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City 06/04/2024 of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 5) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) if the Consultant's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Vendor, and all subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. c. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. d. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. e. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 06/04/2024 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 15. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Willdan Engineering Attn: Tyrone Peter 27368 Via Industria, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 06/04/2024 16. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 17. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 18. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 19. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 21. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following 06104I2024 non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 06/04/2024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: By: RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLDAN ENGINEERING (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Vanessa Munoz President By: hl� Kate Nguyen, ecretary By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Consultant Willdan Engineering Attn: Tyrone Peter 27368 Via Industria, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 (714) 393-1963 tpeter@wilidan.com 10 06/04/2024 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: All tasks to be performed are per the proposal provided by the Contractor attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 11 06/04/2024 TASK 1. Project Management Mr. Peter will maintain contact with City staff primarily through biweekly email updates on the project status. It is our experience Deliverables that this communication activity results in early identification and ■ Project Schedule including PDT resolution of potential project challenges that could otherwise meetings cause the project to go off-track. ■ Meeting Agendas and Minutes Kick -Off Meeting. Upon receiving the notice to proceed from the City, Willdan will prepare a project schedule rased on the scope of work presented in the proposal. The schedule will be submitted to the City far review and acceptance. If other items come up after the original schedule was accepted, Willdan will revise/update the schedule to meet the City's timeframe. Willdan will participate in a kick-off meeting to include the decision -makers from the City and other agencies such as electrical and other agencies that become known to us resulting from our research. The meeting will be used to discuss project scope and schedule including design goals and criteria, roles and responsibilities, work program, budgeting, utility coordination, plan and specifications preparation, cost estimate, submittal reviews, and anticipated construction issues. We will: 1. Maintain continuous communication with the City of Temecula Project Manager, including meetings to review the initial concept plan and project status at 60%, 90%, and 100% completion. 2. Provide agendas of special items for discussion and minutes listing actions. 3. Provide a detailed project schedule subject to City's approval (including a two -week look -ahead at Project Delivery Team (PDT) meetings). 4. Maintain continuous awareness of the status of each task as it proceeds and make provisions to expedite and resolve any difficulties that may impede progress. 5. Proactively initiate communication efforts between the design team and the City of Temecula to address key issues in a timely manner. TASK 2 - AGENCY AND UTILITY COORDINATION Willdan will provide agency and utility coordination necessary for successful project completion. Specifically, we will: Deliverables 1. Coordinate with the affected utility companies within the ■ Meeting Agendas and Minutes project limits as well as adjacent Agencies as necessary. ■ Utility Notification Letters 2. Prepare an initial request for utility information, such as ■ Utility Matrix atlas sheets, mapping, or as -built plans, and notify the need to install planned facilities in the area of the project. 3. Review utility information to determine the impact of the project on the various utilities, including making contact with each affected utility company to determine profiles of high hazard/high pressure facilities that may interfere with proposed construction and how they would be upgraded or relocated. Lead efforts to identify ownership of unknown utility lines. 4. Submit 60%, 90% and 100% plans to the utility companies for review and comment, including notification of date of planned construction start. 5. Maintain a utility contact matrix documenting contacts, issues, etc., with utility companies. Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 39 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) TASK 3 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 3.01 - Design Survey Deliverables Topographic Survey E AutoCAD (Civil 313) drawing, version 2021 or lower, A design level Topographic Survey (aerial mapping and including 3D surface file(s) conventional field survey) will be provided for the area as outlined ■ Signed and stamped PDF file in the aerial picture shown on Exhibit "A" (the Site). The boundary component of the survey will include a field boundary verification denoting current property lines and easements of record as shown on current county recorded maps. Current title reports are to be provided by the client if easements on private properties are to be shown. The items to be included are as follows: Survey Control 1. The vertical control will be based on the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). A local municipal benchmark will be used, if available. Confirmation of the vertical datum will be required before field mobilization. 2. The horizontal control will be based on the California State Plane Coordinate System of 1983 (NAD 83). Confirmation of the horizontal datum/EPOCH will be required before field mobilization. Survey Features 1. The majority of the survey will be prepared using aerial photography. Supplemental observations will be taken at 100-foot street cross sections along the raised medians and compiled with the photogrammetric data to create the final deliverable. Field spot elevations will also be captured along the sidewalk gaps and select ADA ramps. In these areas, field shots will be captured at back of walk/sidewalks, top of curbs, flow lines, gutter edges, driveway aprons, local depressions, and handicap ramps, as applicable. The survey will be prepared to provide 1-foot contour intervals. 2. Spot elevations to determine the water flow of adjacent streets and catch basins that terminate or commence offsite and flow within the Site. 3. Location of signing and striping within the Site. 4. Location of trees over 6 feet in height, regardless of caliper, within the Site. Utilities 1. Location, elevation, size, and type of visible above ground utilities within the Site captured with the aerial survey. 2. Flow line invert elevations will not be surveyed. 3. Existing utility lines identified by painted striping from USA markings will be shown if captured in the aerial survey. The research and plotting of record subsurface utilities and hiring a utility locating subcontractor are not included in this proposal. Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 40 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) 1ras + i + , r l� , r� . r•C,� EXHIBIT "A" ! ��� _ �• ti � may,{ ' � _h ! '.x Y A.. S Pfoposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 41 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) 40 t - A Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 42 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) 7. T • ,, r 't .� k. W EJJE`` t Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 43 Nh/ Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 44 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) 3.02 - Records Research and Field Reviews Willdan will provide the following services: Deliverables ■ Meeting Agendas and Minutes 1. Research and review base data documents, including as- ' Utility Notification Letters built improvement plans, utility information, existing ' Utility Matrix pavement section information, and other available record data. 2. Conduct a design review field meeting with City staff at 60% and 90% design completion to evaluate design recommendations against existing conditions. 3.03 — Geotechnical Engineering Deliverables We understand that the only pavement improvements that are . Evaluation Memo, stamped anticipated with this project are what is needed for the construction and signed (PDF) of the raised medians. Willdan's Geotechnical Engineer will provide ■ Draft Geotechnical Report the following services. (PDF) ■ Final Geotechnical Report 1. Evaluation Memo — Evaluate existing soil and pavement (Ring -Bound Hard Copies and conditions prior to making design recommendations. PDF) Document potential areas of reconstruction, as well as special problem areas that may require a form of pretreatment prior to their rehabilitation, such as rutting and flushing. 2. Coordinate coring and testing, including core log prepared by the pavement engineer identifying core locations and locations requiring R-value testing. Engineer's observations shall be used as part of determining pavement properties to recommend a rehabilitation approach. The investigation will consist of a total of 10 cores/borings. Cores/borings will be located at strategic locations within the limits of the medians and the portion of the project limit to be widened, and drilled to a maximum depth of 2 feet below ground surface (bgs). The purpose of this investigation is to measure the thicknesses of the existing pavement sections, AC and AB, and collect representative sub -grade samples for laboratory testing. 3. During the field reconnaissance, determine, mark and record coring locations, and identify and record deflection test point alignments. 4. Perform a review of cores and test data to ascertain potential problems with specific strategies, such as geometric constraints, wet subgrade, thin pavement sections, fabric interlayer's affecting cold milling, special base materials, etc. 5. The evaluations will also include soil sampling and testing to provide necessary parameters for the design of a foundation for standard retaining wall. 6. Evaluate cracking conditions on the roadway in lanes and segments, core and test information, and calculate based on Asphalt Institute methods a design overlay thickness and strategy, including various overlay materials and interlayers. 7. Perform value engineering evaluation of lifespan versus cost for viable strategies. Coordinate the results with the information on the pavement management system. 8. Prepare Engineering report, including summary of existing conditions and recommendations for earthwork and rehabilitation, applying all the parameters and strategies to the analysis, which shall be based on traffic index (TI). 9. Prepare typical sections and special provisions for pavement, and coordinate design of pavement rehabilitation. Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 45 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) 10. Take design plans to the site and mark repair areas in the field conforming to City -agreed parameters, and generally proof overlay design aspects such as special conditions for cold milling, and other treatments, and coordinate for recording and plotting on plans. 11. Monitor inclusion of the final details on the project plans, and estimates, special details, construction notes, and specifications to ensure proper implementation at time of construction. 12. Civil Engineer shall review the mix design documentation submitted during construction. Pavement Engineer to verify product conforming to specifications to ensure the design lifespan of the roadway. 13. The Geotechnical Report shall include cost-effective pavement rehabilitation strategies that meet the project budget. At a minimum, four pavement rehabilitation strategies shall be offered, one of which shall consist of pavement pulverization. Each shall meet the minimum 10-year design. Prior to preparing the draft Geotechnical Report, Consultant shall obtain City Approval of pavement rehabilitation methods and costs. 3.04 — National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Program Compliance Willdan assumes that this project is not considered a redevelopment project as defined by the City of Temecula Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual. Per the City manual, the proposed sidewalk additions are not considered to be a priority development project and do not Deliverables impact additional impervious surface areas. The proposed Water Quality Management median improvements will reduce the impervious surface area Plan (WQMP) of the roadway. Per the City's requirements, Willdan will prepare a water quality management plan (WQMP) to identify the source control, site design BMPs and Construction Phase BMPs required to prevent pollutants from entering the project's construction and post -construction runoff. 3.05 — Environmental Documentation Deliverables The identified street segments will rely on local City funds. As CEQAsuch, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) criteria will be notice categorical exemption notice of exemption forms applied — more specifically, the application of provisions under Article 19 — Categorical Exemptions (CE). Willdan will prepare the notice of exemption for the City to execute and file. 3.06 — Preliminary Plans-30% Plans Deliverables Willdan understands that the primary purpose of this project is to ■ Conceptual Plan - 30% build raised medians. The raised medians will enhance the safety of the street for the resident community and for the visiting tourist. In addition, the landscaping of the proposed medians will improve the aesthetics of this road for motorists. Willdan will provide a conceptual plan with the median layout, grading limits, drainage impacts, utilities, pavement delineation, signage, landscape and irrigation themes. The City has also requested a conceptual monument sign detail to be included. We understand that the intersection of Margarita and Rancho California is to be a major focal point. As part of our field review, research and data gathering, Willdan would like to arrange a meeting with the City's maintenance facilities managers and/or supervisor to obtain as much detailed information as Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 46 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) possible regarding the proposed improvements (e.g., drainage, hardscape, trees to remain, etc.). This input will provide specific recommendations pertaining to the improvements for the purposes of maximizing the budgets. Additionally, the purpose of the meeting is to get first-hand knowledge about the existing site conditions and discuss proposed modifications to accommodate the new hardscape areas. Furthermore, this field review will also identify potential design constraints and conflicts and observe general site conditions. We also understand that the city's general plan has modified the roadway cross sections for a Principal Arterial Roadway lane widths and we will follow the current adopted general plan to design the pavement delineations and the median. Once approved, Willdan will proceed to the final plan preparation phase. TASK 4 - FINAL ENGINEERING Plans, specifications, and estimates shall be provided at levels of Deliverables completion of approximately 60%, 90%, and 100% (Mylar). The ■ Three sets of plan and City of Temecula will provide review comments at the concept, electronic submittals at 60% 60% and 90% design stage. It is expected that 100% plans will be and 90% completion complete and include comments and input from all stakeholders. milestones Plans shall conform to the City of Temecula standard plans and 0 One full-size mylar of 100% drawings. shall be prepared utilizing AutoCAD software. Copies of Auto CAD ■ Electronic files of final plans files shall accompany each level of plan submittal. (DWG and PDF) We understand that the project includes Raised medians with landscaping and irrigation, sidewalk where missing or damaged, missing curb and gutter, grading and earthwork, Class II, bike lane, storm drain facilities (where necessary), Landscape & irrigation, signing and striping, erosion control and storm water pollution prevention plan, utilities etc. Project plans shall include the following: 1. Title, typical section, and construction detail sheets. The plans will be per City's formats. 2. Civil design plans are to include pavement improvements, utility base mapping, median improvements, necessary drainage details, etc. The plans shall be at a horizontal scale of 1" = 40'. We believe 40-scale plans will be a cost-effective approach and the plans will be clear from bid and construction. Willdan will provide samples of plans at 40 scale if the City would like to see. 3. Willdan will include all existing and proposed improvements including pavement, storm drains, utilities, above ground appurtenances, landscaping, irrigation lines, fences, and any other proposed information. 4. Willdan will coordinate with all related agencies, utility companies, and nearby developers for the proposed improvements. 5. Design elements required to comply with the NPDES program. 6. Signing and striping plans at a horizontal scale of 1" = 40' 7. Submit 60% and 90% completion plans for City's review and comments. Revise plans based on City comments. 8. Submit 100% plans (mylars, DWG and PDF) Willdan will consult with the City at such reasonable times and places as necessary to accomplish the foregoing. In performing said services, the Consulting Engineer shall use, whenever possible, the standard Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 47 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) details, specifications as approved by the City of Temecula for Public Works Projects. All drawings and specifications shall be adequate and sufficient for the City of Temecula to solicit bids for the award of the contract for said work. TASK 5 — FINAL ENGINEERING - COST ESTIMATES Prepare quantity calculations and final construction cost estimates Deliverables in accordance with City requirements to the established project ■ Cost Estimate at Concept, 60%, budget. 90%and 100% Completion Milestones ■ Calculations Backup • Electronic Files of Cost Estimates (MS Excel and PDF) TASK 6 — FINAL ENGINEERING — SPECIFICATIONS Willdan will prepare Technical Special Provisions per City of Deliverables Temecula requirements for bidding by the City. The City will . Cost Special Provisions and Bid prepare boilerplate specifications and the City will prepare the bid Schedule at the 60%, 40% and package. Special provisions shall be prepared per Greenbook 2024 100% Completion Milestones format. Special provisions will follow the City's format and will ■ Electronic Files of 100% reference the latest version of the standard specifications. Specifications (MS Word and PDF) ENGINEERING SUPPORT DURING BID AND CONSTRUCTION Bid support services and engineering support during construction are not included in this scope of work but can be provided if needed under a separate contract. Willdan will provide electronic files and will provide a plot of all control coordinates for use in construction staking. Willdan will conduct a field investigation to verify existing topographic conditions and identify unusual or special conditions and review available improvement plans, utility plans, and data records within the project area. The survey document current conditions such as existing grades, surface culture and any other existing items/structures, along with assisting with designing/placement of the renovations/improvements. Willdan's Resource Matrix showing staff hours by task is shown on the following page. b. Timeline Willdan's schedule showing the various tasks and total time frame proposed to complete the project is shown following the Resource Matrix. Proposal for Temecula Rancho California Road Median 48 Improvements Project W23-04 (RFP No. 284) EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Cost for services shall be as per Consultant's proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $290,034.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 12 G6/04/2024 CITY OF TEMECULA Rancho Can/ornia Blvd Street fmpo omanf - Pfans, SpecMCatiam and Estimate FEE SCHEDULE - REVISED Afoaday. Nowmaer 11. 1024 e•w...4 ewpv,Nn.4 ^'^��^+^ ao.N� s,•..Txq 'w.w ew.n aw..nrw M, lox wAq �.++.w [wm.na 611MMMYTAlM hyv1Y....r u.a�auNc •N•w !•K'Mx lAW�' l�xw Gl�...,i a.••prv�a uY4x !�� Tr.r. Neu. Lp.•... lxi�btl yy��!.y/�1� T.w� lMw+m. clN,y aaM xpiy�n TOT.1! 1r N. f4 >t N r 1n IM 1M 114 4 r 2ti t ®lw i aapl ![E echldu4 TEN apnpp r.Nan4_aEtn�o ma! �t t t 40/W I LLDAN DESIGN ENGINEERING Technical Aide 1 $81 Technical Aide 11 $103 Technical Aide 111 $120 CAD Operator 1 $128 CAD Operator II $148 CAD Operator III $165 GIS Analyst 1 $168 GIS Analyst II $184 GIS Analyst 111 $191 Environmental Analyst 1 $144 Environmental Analyst 11 $161 Environmental Analyst 111 $171 Environmental Specialist $185 Designer 1 $173 Designer II $179 Senior Designer 1 $188 Senior Designer II $197 Design Manager $196 Senior Design Manager $206 Project Manager 1 $186 Project Manager II $207 Project Manager III $217 Project Manager IV $234 Principal Project Manager $238 Program Manager 1 $197 Program Manager 11 $209 Program Manager 111 $228 Assistant Engineer 1 $141 Assistant Engineer II $157 Assistant Engineer III $166 Assistant Engineer IV $175 Associate Engineer 1 $184 Associate Engineer II $192 Associate Engineer III $196 Senior Engineer 1 $199 Senior Engineer 11 $204 Senior Engineer III $207 Senior Engineer IV $211 Supervising Engineer $219 Traffic Engineer 1 $219 Traffic Engineer II $234 City Engineer $234 City Engineer 11 $238 Deputy Director $243 Director $249 Principal Engineer $270 WILLDAN ENGINEERING Schedule of Hourly Rates Effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Code Enforcement Technician Code Enforcement Officer Senior Code Enforcement Officer Supervisor Code Enforcement Fire Plans Examiner Senior Fire Plans Examiner Fire Inspector Senior Fire Inspector Fire Marshal Plans Examiner Aide Plans Examiner Senior Plans Examiner Assistant Construction Permit Specialist Construction Permit Specialist Senior Construction Permit Specialist Supervising Construction Permit Specialist Assistant Building Inspector Building Inspector Senior Building Inspector Supervising Building Inspector Inspector of Record Deputy Building Official Building Official Plan Check Engineer Supervising Plan Check Engineer Principal Project Manager Deputy Director Director CDBG Technician CDBG Specialists CDBG Analyst CDBG Coordinator CDBG Manager Housing Program Coordinator Planning Technician Assistant Planner Associate Planner Senior Planner Principal Planner Planning Manager Deputy Director Director $106 $121 $143 $173 $173 $189 $159 $173 $204 $114 $173 $189 $121 $128 $150 $159 $143 $159 $173 $189 $202 $205 $210 $205 $215 $238 $243 $249 $86 $103 $122 $152 $183 $151 $130 $162 $176 $200 $208 $221 $243 $249 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Labor Compliance Specialist $146 Labor Compliance Manager $183 Utility Coordinator $167 Office Engineer 1 $147 Office Engineer II $167 Assistant Construction Manager $160 Construction Manager $185 Senior Construction Manager $201 Resident Engineer 1 $208 Resident Engineer Ii $216 Project Manager IV $234 Deputy Director $243 Director $249 INSPECTION Public Works Observer " $131 Public Works Observer "'" $159 Senior Public Works Observer" $143 Senior Public Works Observer'*' $159 MAPPING AND EXPERT SERVICES Survey Analyst I $147 Survey Analyst II $169 Senior Survey Analyst $187 Supervisor - Survey & Mapping $203 Principal Project Manager $238 LANDSCAPE Assistant Landscape Architect $153 Associate Landscape Architect $176 Senior Landscape Architect $193 Principal Landscape Architect $204 Principal Project Manager $238 ADMINISTRATIVE Administrative Assistant 1 $99 Administrative Assistant II $120 Administrative Assistant III $140 Project Accountant 1 $112 Project Accountant II $132 Project Controller 1 $140 Project Controller 11 $158 For Non -Prevailing Wage Project * For Prevailing Wage Project Mileage/Field Vehicle usage will be charged at the rate in accordance with the current FTR mileage reimbursement rate, subject to negotiation. Additional billing classifications may be added to the above listing during the year as new positions are created. Consultation in connection with litigation and court appearances will be quoted separately. The above schedule is for straight time. Overtime wits be charged at 1.5 times, and Sundays and holidays, 2.0 times the standard rates. Blueprinting, reproduction, messenger services, and printing will be invoiced at cost plus fifteen percent (15%). A sub consultant management fee of fifteen percent (15%) will be added to the direct cost of all sub consultant services to provide for the cost of administration, consultation, and coordination. Valid July 1, 2024 thru June 30, 2025, thereafter, the rates may be raised once per year to the value between the 12-month % change of the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles/Orange County/Sacramento/San Francisco/San Jose area and five percent. For prevailing wage classifications, the increase will be per the prevailing wage increase set by the California Department of Industrial Relations. Rev V01 0522.2024 1I/W I LLDAN GEOTECHNICAL Soil Technician (Prevailing Wages)— $152 Sr. Soil Technician (Prevailing Wages)" $152 Geclogist II $194 Supervising Geologist $219 CAO Operator II $149 Assistant Engineer 1 $141 Assistant Engineer II $157 Assistant Engineer III $166 Senior Engineer 1 $199 Senior Engineer 11 $204 Senior Engineer 111 $207 Supervising - Lab Inspector $144 Field Operations Manager $154 Supervising Engineer $219 Principal Project Manager $238 Principal Engineer $270 Special Inspection (Prevailing Wages)— 5159 Supervisor $173 WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL I MATERIALS TESTING Prevailing Wage Schedule of Hourly Rates Effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 Administrative Assistant 1 $99 Administrative Assistant II $120 Administrative Assistant Ili $140 Principal Engineer/Geologist $440 '"For inspectorlsoil technician there is a four-hour minimum. Any hours worked more than the four-hour minimum will be charged at the eight -hour daily rate. Same day cancellations will be charged as a four-hour minimum. MileagelField Vehicle usage will be charged at the rate in accordance with the current FTR mileage reimbursement rate, subject to negotiation. Travel time to and from the job site will be charged at the hourly rates for the appropriate personnel. Staff assignments depend on availability of personnel, site location, and the level of experience that will satisfy the technical requirements of the project and meet the prevailing standard of professional care, The above schedule is for straight time. Overtime will be charged at 1.5 times, and Sundays and holidays, 2.0 times the standard rates.. Blueprinting, reproduction, messenger services, and printing will be invoiced at cost plus fifteen percent (15%). A subconsultant management fee of fifteen percent (15%) will be added to the direct cost of all subconsultant services to provide for the cost of administration, consultation, and coordination. Valid July 1, 2024 thru June 30, 2025, thereafter, the rates may be raised once per year to the value between the 12-month % change of the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles/Orange CountylSacramentolSan Francisco/San Jose area and five percent. For prevailing wage classifications, the increase will be per the prevailing wage increase set by the California Department of Industrial Relations. Page 1 of 4 Rev V03 05, 22.2024 1VW I LLDAN WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL ! MATERIALS TESTING Unit Testing Rate Sheet* Effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 In -situ Moisture and Density (ASTM D2937) $50 per Test Grain Size Analysis - Sieve Only (ASTM D6913) $150 per Test Grain Size Analysis -- Sieve & Hydrometer (ASTM D6913 & D7928) $250 per Test Percent Passive #200 Sieve (ASTM D1140) $120 per Test Atterberg Limits - Multi Point (ASTM D4318) $250 per Test Atterberg Limits- One Point (ASTM D431 8) $100 per Test Specific Gravity (ASTM D854) $150 per Test Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419) Compaction and Bearing $168 per Test Modified Proctor Compaction - Method A or B (ASTM D1557) $350 per Test Modified Proctor Compaction - Method C (ASTM D1557) $350 per Test Compaction (CTM 216) $285 per Test Californfa Bearing Ratio, CBR - 3 Points (ASTM D1883) $600 per Test R-Value Shear Strength $400 per Test Torvane ! Pocket Penetrometer $25 per Test Direct Shear, Consolidated Drained - 3 Point (ASTM D3080) $650 per Test Direct Shear, Residual - per Point (ASTM D3080) $220 per Test Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2165) $160 per Test Unconsolidated-Undralned (UU) Consolidation, $250 per Test Consolidation - 8 Load Increments w/ One Time Rate (ASTM D2435) $600 per Test Consolidation -Additional Load Increment (ASTM D2435) $130 per Test Consolidation - Additional Time Rate per Load Increment (ASTM D2435) $130 per Test Collapse Test - Single Point $130 per Test Single Load Swell Test - Ring Sample, Field Moisture (ASTM D4546) $350 per Test Single Load Swell Test - Ring Sample, Air Dried (ASTM D4546) $350 per Test Remolded Sample per Specimen $70 per Teat Expansion Index (ASTM D48291 UBC 29-2) Laboratory $200 per Test Constant Head (ASTM D2434) $350 per Test Falling Head Flexible Wall (ASTM D5084) $350 per Test Triaxial Permeability (EPA 9100) Chemical Tests $400 per Test Corrosivity (pH, Resistivity, Sulfates, Chlorides) $250 per Test Organic Contents (ASTM D2974) $125 per Test Asphalt Tests Extraction 1 Asphalt (CTM 382) $300 per Test Hveem 1 Marshall Maximum Density (CTM 304, 308) $500 per Test Wash Gradation (CTM 202) $200 per Tesl Page 3 of 4 Rev V03 05.22.2W4 40/W I LLDAN WILLDAN GEOTECHNICAL 1 MATERIALS TESTING Unit Testing Rate Sheet* Effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025 6"x12" & 4"xB" Cylinder Compression Test (ASTM C39) $50 per Test 2", 4" & 6" Diameter Cores Compression Test $50 per Test 3"x6" Cylinder Lightweight Concrete Compression Test (ASTM C495) $50 per Test Shotcrete i Gunite Lab Coring & Compression Test (ASTM C42) $100 per Test Unit Weight of Hardened Lightweight Concrete (ASTM C567) $85 per Test Rapid Cure Concrete Cy€finders (Boil Method) (ASTM C684) $100 per Test 2"x4" Mortar Cylinder Compression Test (ASTM C780) $50 per Test 2°x2" Mortar Cube Compression Test (ASTM C109) $50 per Test 3"x6" Grout Prism Compression Test (ASTM C111019) $50 per Test CM Grouted Prism Compression Test, up to 8"x8"x16" (ASTM E447) $275 per Test CMU Grouted Prism Compression Test, larger than 8"x8"x16" (ASTM E447) $300 per Test Steel Reinforcement Tensile or Bend Test, up to #8 (ASTM A370) $200 per Test Tensile or Bend Test, #9 to #11 (ASTM A370) $250 per Test Tensile or Bend Test, #14 (ASTM A370) $300 per Test Fireproofing Unit Weight (UBC 7-6) $55 per Test Cohesion / Adhesion (UBC 7-6) $65 per Test Non -Destructive Dye Penetrant Testing $145 per Hour Ultrasonic Testing $145 per Hour Magnetic Particle Testing $145 per Hour Radiographic Testing Quote Administrative Sample Pickup from Field (within 1 60 miles of lab $190 per Trip Saturday Sample Pickup from Field (within 100 miles of lab $310 per Trip Sunday Sample Pickup from Field (within 100 miles of lab $310 per Trip Mix Design Review $900 per Mix Lab Test Report $50 per Report Field Vehicle Usage (by Soil/Asphalt Technician) $10 per Hour Field Nuclear Gauge Usage (by Soil/Asphalt Technician) $60 per Hour "A not to exceed (NTE) $500 fee will be assessed for field compaction testing when performing by a full time public works inspection or when providing materials inspection at the minimum of 4 hours, as the field compaction tests are included in the material inspectors hourly rate. If performing public works inspection under 4 hours will be charged for field compaction testing at a unit cost of $75 per test. Page 4 of 4 Rev V03 05.22.2024 Adft IT The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project will design and construct missing raised medians on Rancho California Road between Humber Drive and Butterfield Stage Road in accordance with the City's General Plan. In addition, missing street improvements will be constructed on the north side of Rancho California Road between Riesling Court and Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The improvements will include median curbs, curb and gutter, sidewalks, and landscape and irrigation. Benefit: The raised medians will enhance the safety of the street. In addition, the landscaping of the proposed medians will improve the aesthetics of this road for motorists. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Scoping initiated in FY2022-23. Design anticipated to begin in Spring/Summer 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW23-04 / 791 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2023-24 Adjusted 2024-25 Proposed Budget 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 2027-28 Projected Projected 2028-29 Projected Total Project Cost 5801-Administration 20,782 144,218 40,000 40,000 300,000 545,000 5804-Construction 2,512,000 2,512,000 5805-Construction Engineering 85,000 85,000 5802-Design & Environmental 698,000 698,000 5240-Utilities 55,000 55,000 Total Expenditures 20,782 897,218 40,000 40,000 2,897,000 3,895,000 Source of Funds: 4666-Developer Contribution 57,200 57,200 4242-DIF-Street Improvements 20,782 690,018 40,000 750,800 4002-Measure S 150,000 40,000 190,000 4452-Unspecified 2,897,000 2,897,000 Total Funding 20,782 897,218 40,000 40,000 2,897,000 3,895,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Developer Contribution represents the Pervis Development's fair share of the medians. W OF TENjtG G ooti ioo o 4a 1989 ��ONS� YEW OHO Legend City of Temecula Boundary Parcels Street Names Highways HWY d INTERCHANGE . INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP . USHWY Hospitals Creeks ❑ Cities Streets <Null> PAVED -- PROPOSED UNPAVED Public Facilities Parks Schools Notes 4,136.0 0 2,067.98 4,136.0 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. © Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. for the Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project, PW22-05 PREPARED BY: Nino Abad, Senior Civil Engineer Emalee Sena, Assistant Engineer I RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the agreement for consultant services with RHA Landscape Architects - Planners, Inc. for the Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project, PW22-05, in the amount of $673,843; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve extra work authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $67,384.30, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: The Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project is an infrastructure project that will include the design, environmental, and construction of multi -use trails at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park located between Ronald Reagan Sports Park to the north, Pauba Road to the south, Margarita Road to the east, and border of the park to the west. On August 29, 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP No. 298 (Reissue)) inviting qualified consulting firms to submit a proposal to provide consultant services to design the site improvements necessary to construct multi -use trails at the Ronald Reagan Sports Park. By the filing deadline of October 17, 2023, staff received five (5) proposals. A selection committee comprised of representatives from the City reviewed the proposals, discussed findings, conducted an interview of the top two qualified firms, and ranked the prospective bidders as follows: 1. RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. 2. Hoch Consulting 3. Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc. 4. Dokken Engineering 5. NV5 Staff determined that RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. is the most qualified consultant. RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. has successfully performed similar projects for various public agencies. Staff has negotiated a scope of work and an equitable fee with RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. for their Consultant Services. As part of the design process, the Consultant and City staff will perform community outreach such as workshops, pop-up events, surveys, and other activities to engage future trail users and seek their input. FISCAL IMPACT: The Bike Lane and Trail Program - Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project, PW22-05, is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2025-2029 and is funded with Measure "S", DIF- Open Space & Trails, DIF-Park & Rec Improvements, and DIF-Quimby. Adequate funds are available in the project account to cover the proposed agreement amount of $673,843 for consultant services plus the 10% contingency amount of $67,384.30, for a total encumbrance of $741,227.30. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement 2. Project Description 3. Project Location AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK TRAILS PROJECT, PW22-05 THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of February 11, 2025, between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "City"), and RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" ). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 11, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2027, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Prevailing wages are required on all City Agreements involving Construction, Design, and Preconstruction Phases of Construction (including, but not limited to, Inspection and Land Surveying Work), and Maintenance (except for Janitorial or Security Guards) for work on City property. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any 01/01/2025 subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. All contractors and sub -contractors who provide the type of work or services that require the payment of prevailing wage must register with the Department of Industrial Relations this includes but is not limited to: Construction, Design, and Preconstruction Phases of Construction (including, but not limited to, Inspection, Geotechnical, and Land Surveying Work), and Maintenance (except for Janitorial or Security Guards) for work on City property. 5. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html 6. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Six Hundred Seventy -Three Thousand Eight Hundred Forty -Three Dollars and Zero Cents ($673,843.00) unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 01 /01 /2025 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 8. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission 01 /01 /2025 of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant. 10. INDEMNIFICATION a. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In connection with its design professional services, but subject to the limitations of Section 2 of this Agreement, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, its elected officials, officers, employees, designated volunteers and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role City officials (collectively "Indemnitees"), with respect to any and all claims, demands, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of reasonable attorney fees and costs of defense (collectively "Claims"), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property which to the extent arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employee, sub - consultants, or agents in the performance or its professional services under this Agreement. In no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault as set forth in California Civil Code 2782.8. b. Other Indemnities. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than Two Million ($2,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 01 /01 /2025 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Concessionaire has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. By executing this Agreement, Vendor is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in aggregate. Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager. c. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant's products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true 01 /01 /2025 "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 5) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) If the Consultant's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Consultant. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Vendor, and all subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. 01 /01 /2025 b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 15. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street 01 /01 /2025 Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: RHA Landscape Architects -Planner's Inc. Attn: Doug Grove 6840 Indiana Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 9250 16. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 17. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 18. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 19. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely 01 /01 /2025 upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 21. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 01 /01 /2025 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: By RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Consultant RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. Attn: Doug Grove _ 6840 Indiana Avenue, Suite 100 Riverside, CA 92506 951 781-1930 Dougg@rhala.com 10 01/01/2025 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: Scope of Services and Schedule All tasks to be performed are per the proposal provided by the Consultant attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 11 01/01/2025 Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Scope of Work We understand that the design engineering will be based on the 2024 conceptual design below. Our team will work in collaboration with the Park & Recreation subcommittee and will plan and coordinate in at two community meetings and two Pop -Up events as well as conduct Citywide surveys through City website and social media. Our team will prepare the public surveys and get it approved by the City, provide necessary visuals (for the meetings and website) and be present to discuss any issues or questions that arise. Engineering design will build on the preliminary route work completed to date. Our team will provide complete design engineering services that will include, but not be limited to, trail design engineering and construction cost estimates, and preparation of constructions documents. A. PROJECT KICK-OFF AND SITE RESEARCH 1) Project Kick-off Meeting Our team will plan and attend a pre -design (kick-off) meeting and maintain continuous communication with the City Project Manager, provide agendas, provide a detailed project schedule with updates on a monthly basis, maintain continuous awareness of the status of each task, and proactively initiate communication efforts between the design team and the City of Temecula to address key issues timely. 2) Field Verification and Site Research Our team will perform site review and field -verify existing improvements, adjacent grading, and utilities. This will include: a. Establish on -site Basis of Bearing based on the California State Plane Zone 6. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula b. Establish vertical datum based on a locally published benchmark. c. Detail locations of existing of 3 bridge trail crossings over creek. d. An Aerial Topographic Survey of the subject site, the limits of which are shown on Appendix 'A', shall be performed in a manner as to identify the general topography of the site as well as to identify all visible cultural features such as building and structure outlines, curb and gutter, hardscape limits, striping, lighting and power poles, fencing, manhole lids, approximate tree and brush lines, and other apparatus visible from the air. Aerial Topographic Survey will also include establishing ground control and setting and collecting survey information on the aerial targets. Aerial Topographic Survey shall be prepared at the scale of 1" = 20' or as suitable for this specific project. 3) Geotechnical Investigation and Report Verdantas will prepare a geotechnical investigation and report that will include structural foundation conditions and recommendations including any over excavation and recompaction areas or surcharges; pavement design; conclusions and recommendations. B. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Activities already completed for the project include researching and mapping parcel/property ownership data, and alternative routes and conducting public engagement activities to gather community input and support for the project. There was also an effort to develop a conceptual design that minimizes potential environmental impacts. In addition, the City has in its possession the following completed biological studies: Biological Constraints Analysis, Cultural Resource Technical Report, Burrowing Owl Report, and Least Bell's Vireo (Vireo bellii pusillis) Report. UltraSystems will rely on these reports as accurate and complete in the development of the CEQA document. The proposed project requires environmental review pursuant to applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and attendant State CEQA Guidelines, both as amended and locally adopted. We concur with the City's preliminary determination that an IS/MND will likely be the appropriate CEQA compliance document. Our approach to undertaking the upcoming assignment begins with developing a comprehensive understanding of the proposed project. The City desires to engage a consultant to complete any additional environmental reports as required under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and to prepare notices and assist in filing the Notice of Determination (NOD) and Record of Decision (ROD), and other notices as required under CEQA. In addition to reviewing project plans by SB&O Inc., UltraSystems will obtain from the design team information as available pertaining to project construction including construction phasing, construction staging locations, construction equipment mix and composition, and number of construction workers. This will facilitate the accurate assessment of the project's potential impacts, and develop meaningful mitigation as warranted. MAJOR TASK 1.0 — PROJECT INITIATION, MEETING, MANAGEMENT & PROJECT DESCRIPTION Task 1.1: Project Kick -Off and Progress Meetings. This Task consists of attendance by our Project Director and Senior Project Manager at one project kick-off meeting via Zoom. This meeting is critical to setting the tone for all subsequent efforts. This task also includes the attendance of our Senior Project Manager at any project progress meetings during the contract performance period. It is anticipated that all these meetings will be virtual. UltraSystems will be available throughout the term of our services to respond to City staff requests for input concerning various aspects of the CEQA process. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Task 1.2: Project Management and Coordination. This Task consists of routine project management and communications functions of our Project Manager throughout the contract performance period. Task 1.3: Project Description. After receipt of a formal notice to proceed and receipt of project- related information, UltraSystems will prepare a draft Project Description for review and comment by the City. The Project Description will contain all the information required under § 15124 of the CEQA Guidelines including a description of the land use plan and timing for construction of all required improvements. UltraSystems will revise the Project Description based on one round of comments received from City staff and prepare a final Project Description. MAJOR TASK 2.0 - TECHNICAL STUDIES This Major Task includes the collection of all requisite information for those issues for which no stand- alone technical reports are being prepared and the preparation of the technical studies/technical analyses listed below. For all technical reports, drafts of the technical studies will be submitted to the City for review and comment and then revised as warranted to become final technical reports prior to being used to support issue -specific discussions in the Initial Study. All technical studies will be included as appendices to the Initial Study to be prepared for the proposed project. Task 2.1: Background Data Collection/Evaluation. For those issues in the Initial Study requiring evaluation but for which no technical study will either be prepared or made available by the City, UltraSystems will conduct literature research to document existing conditions at the project site and surrounding area. Sources of data to be used in this analysis include the City of Temecula General Plan, its attendant Program EIR, or other adopted CEQA documents prepared for other projects in the immediate area, and applicable regional policy plans, among others. Task 2.2: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment. UltraSystems will prepare an Air Quality Assessment and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment for the proposed project. Existing conditions will be documented by summarizing baseline air quality information, including area topography and meteorology and their influence on air quality; the relevant state and federal ambient air quality standards (AAQS); ambient monitoring data from the closest monitoring station(s) to the project site for the past three years; and attainment status with respect to state and federal AAQS. Ambient monitoring data available from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resources Board (ARB), and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) websites will be incorporated. The setting will also identify existing and foreseeable sensitive receptors near the project site. It will also identify existing major sources of air pollutants in the project vicinity, including sources of toxic air contaminants and odorous emissions. The regulatory setting will also discuss plans to achieve the state and federal AAQS, and rules and regulations that may apply to stationary sources associated with operation of the proposed project. UltraSystems will coordinate with the project team to develop construction equipment and phasing assumptions. Maximum daily construction emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), particulate matter (PMlo, PM2.5) and sulfur oxides (SOx) will be estimated with the California Emissions Estimator Model® (CaIEEMod). Operational emissions, including those from project -generated traffic, will be estimated with the same software. Where significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures will be identified and discussed. Mitigation measures in the form of land use and energy policies and best management practices will be recommended to reduce or avoid potential project specific or cumulative impacts on air quality. Where possible, the effectiveness of RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula the mitigation measures will be quantified, and the significance of the project impacts with mitigation will be reevaluated and compared to the significance thresholds. The GHG analysis will obtain information necessary to evaluate the two significance criteria prescribed in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. One criterion requires estimation of the GHG emissions by the project, and the other evaluates the project's consistency with GHG reduction policies and programs. The emissions estimation portion of the analysis will include the following: • Using CalEEMod, calculate annual emissions of the principal GHGs (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) and carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) during construction. • Following SCAQMD guidance, "amortize" construction emissions over 30 years of project operations, • Review the traffic impact analysis Trip Generation & Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Study prepared by RK Engineering for the project to determine whether there would be an increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and/or a change in traffic volumes and speeds due to the project. • Use the ARB's EMFAC2021 software to estimate annual traffic related GHG emissions without and with the project. These emissions will be combined with the annual amortized construction emissions to determine annual GHG emissions. • Propose, with input from the City, quantitative or semi -quantitative thresholds of significance for GHG emissions for use in this analysis. • Recommend mitigation measures, as needed, for GHG emissions from the project. The second portion of analysis will include a review of applicable GHG emissions reduction policies and plans to determine whether the project would conflict with those plans. UltraSystems will determine whether the project would be designed to comply with the provisions of the California Green Building Code, Title 24, Part 11 of the California Code of Regulations or would otherwise incorporate measures to minimize energy use. These project features would assist City staff in meeting their GHG emission reduction targets. All modeling data and/or data work sheets will be included within the Initial Study Technical Appendices. Task 2.3: Noise Impact Assessment. UltraSystems will prepare a noise impact assessment for the proposed project. This study will document ambient noise levels experienced along the studied roadway segments and at the property lines to the project site. It will estimate noise levels with project operation and existing sources of literature documenting stationary sources. Ambient noise levels will be documented using a Quest Technologies, SounclPro, DL-1-1/3 noise meter that meets the standards outlined in ANSI/ASA S1.13-2020 (American National Standard Measurement of Sound Pressure Levels in Air). • Noise levels generated by construction and operational activities will be calculated. UltraSystems has substantial experience with calculating noise levels, including demolition and site preparation, excavation, and building construction. Estimated construction noise levels will be compared to the City's General Plan Noise Element, and the Municipal Code to determine whether significant impacts would occur. Using noise prediction modeling, UltraSystems will determine the potential for the project to cause a substantial permanent noise increase above levels without the project at the property line. Predicted noise levels will be compared to adopted thresholds and goals, policies, and objectives from the General Plan and conclusions will be drawn as to whether any potential increase would represent a significant acoustical impact requiring mitigation. Noise levels generated by onsite uses, machinery during construction and operation, construction trucks and operation vans, landscape equipment, will also be discussed and compared to adopted standards. Mitigation will be proposed for all significant noise impacts. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Use of heavy earthmoving equipment during construction can generate enough vibration to adversely affect nearby receivers. UltraSystems will perform a vibration screening analysis, using methods and reference vibration levels from the Federal Transit Administration's Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (2018) to determine whether construction vibration would be high enough to damage structures or cause annoyance to sensitive receivers. Task 2.4: VMT Screening Analysis. A VMT screening analysis will be prepared in accordance with the City's Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). RK Engineering will prepare a qualitative VMT analysis for the proposed project discussing the City's criteria to screen out the proposed project from requiring a full quantified VMT analysis. If the City requires a detailed VMT analysis and model run during the scoping phase, this scope and related budget will be amended for the Client's approval to accommodate the additional tasks under an increased budget. The following detailed work tasks will be performed by RK Engineering for the Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Analysis: 1. Discuss the project with the client. 2. Obtain the most current site plan and land use data for the project. 3. Determine the project's trip generation utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates. RK Engineering will also take into account any existing trip credits that may be applicable to the project. 4. Compare the project trip generation to City level of service analysis requirements and conclude that a full traffic impact study is not warranted for the project. 5. Perform a VMT screening analysis for the project based on the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Level of Service Assessment. The project is expected to screen out from a full VMT analysis. 6. Summarize the results of the analysis in a memorandum letter report. Task 2.5: Biological Assessment (if needed). UltraSystems will utilize to the greatest extent possible all information from Helix, which includes the following: (1) Biological Assessment for the entire Sports Park Site, (2) BUOW Focused Field Survey Report(s), and (3) Least Bell's Vireo Survey Report(s). We will also need their GIS Shape files, from the aforementioned biological surveys should additional work be conducted by our firm. If there are any additional surveys that may be required, UltraSystems will perform the following: UltraSystems' biologists will research readily available information, including relevant literature, databases, agency web sites, various previously completed reports and management plans, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data, maps, aerial imagery from public domain sources, and in-house that may apply to the project. Following the literature review, biologists will conduct a reconnaissance -level biological survey of the newly aligned Trail Project and a 150-meter/500-foot zone out from the project site. This survey area is referred to as the Biological Study Area (BSA). The survey will include the following: • Habitat assessment and plant community mapping. • Step I Burrowing owl habitat assessment • General plant survey. • General wildlife survey. • Jurisdictional assessment. • Riparian/riverine/vernal pools and fairy shrimp habitat assessment. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula • Wildlife movement evaluation. Following completion of the reconnaissance -level biological surveys, UltraSystems will prepare a biological resources evaluation report that will: 1) summarize existing conditions; 2) assess the potential presence of sensitive biological resources; 3) analyze the potential impacts on those resources from project implementation; 4) a Western Riverside MSHCP Consistency Analysis; S) recommend, as appropriate, best management practices (BMPs), avoidance and protection measures, and mitigation measures to avoid, eliminate and/or reduce environmental impacts to less than significant levels; and 6) an identification of biological permits or approvals that the project may need. The biological resources evaluation report will also include figures depicting the size and location of plant communities and other sensitive biological resources; a complete flora and fauna compendium; and site photographs. Task 2.6: Presence/Absence Crotch's Bumble Bee Survey. UltraSystems biologists would conduct a presence/absence survey for the Crotch's bumble bee (Bombus crotchii; CBB), a candidate species under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA). This Candidate species receive the same protections as listed species under CESA. This report describes the methods used to perform the survey and the results. The survey considerations for CESA Candidate Bumble Bee Species guideline document recommends reporting all CBB survey results to CDFW. The survey would include the following: (1) a desktop analysis of habitat assessment of historical and current specific occurrences; (2) field observations of estimated absolute percent cover of individual plant species for each habitat alliance and which species were in flower at the time of the habitat assessment. In addition to foraging resources, potential nesting habitat (e.g., small mammal burrows, bunch grasses, thatch, brush piles, old bird nests, and dead trees) and overwintering habitat (e.g., leaf litter and woody forest edge) would be noted during the assessment. If there is CBB habitat identified during the habitat assessment, CBB focused surveys would be required. Focused Field Surveys - Crotch Bumble Bee (if needed). Should habitat or the bee be found on -site during the presence/absence survey, UltraSystems will conduct Focus Field Surveys. The first two surveys for Crotch's bumble bee included photo -only surveys with no handling of individual bumble bees and were conducted in accordance with the CDFW Survey Considerations for California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Candidate Bumble Bee Species document that was issued June 6, 2023 (CDFW 2023) and would follow the methods below. The third survey would include both a photo survey and collection study required under the CDFW. The three evenly spaced protocol level surveys for Crotch bumble bee (Bombus crotchii) spaced throughout the sampling season (early spring to late summer, as determined by host plant phenology — if located on -site). The surveys would be conducted by qualified biologists with expertise in surveying these bees. For each survey pass, each patch of suitable habitat was visually surveyed for 1 person -hour per three acres of the "highest quality" habitat. The survey method would consist of determining appropriate nectar/pollen resources. Two biologists would conduct these surveys and would walk transects through resources with a goal of observing bumble bees in passing and observing bumble bee nest sites associated with small mammal burrow or other appropriate soil cavities. These transects would be walked at 1 person -hour per three acres as the protocol requires. Transects were spaced approximately 10 feet apart. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula The first two surveys would be undertaken without the capture, netting or collecting of the bumble bees. If a bumble bee is observed, photos would be collected of all parts of the bumble bee in order to allow for identification. The final survey would include both photo surveys and capture, netting and collecting of bees, chilling and photographing the bees before release (Xerces Society 2023). Task 2.7: Jurisdictional Delineation. UltraSystems will conduct a formal jurisdictional delineation survey for the proposed trail project and within a 150-meter/500-foot zone around the project footprints. The survey will record: (1) wetland hydrology, hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and signs of an OHWM; (2) the presence of a well-defined bed and bank; (3) areas of water flow; and (4) vegetation within and along jurisdictional areas. Areas of USACE, Los Angeles District, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and CDFW South Coast Region 5 jurisdictional will be delineated in the field using a hand-held GPS unit with sub -meter accuracy. Following the delineation survey, UltraSystems GIS staff would take the measurements and digitize them into an ArcGIS file. Acreages of each agency's jurisdiction, including areas of permanent and temporary impacts, would then be calculated. Following completion of the jurisdictional delineation surveys, UltraSystems will prepare a jurisdictional delineation report in accordance with applicable federal and state agency guidelines. The report will: summarize existing conditions; assess the potential presence of jurisdictional areas; analyze the potential impacts to jurisdictional areas from project construction; recommend, as appropriate, best management practices (BMPs), avoidance and protection measures, and mitigation measures to avoid, eliminate and/or reduce impacts to jurisdictional areas; and provide an identification of jurisdictional permits that the project may need. A JD report will include methods and results of the literature review and field surveys; figures depicting the size and location of jurisdictional areas, if any; site photographs; and field data sheets. The report will comply with the requirements of the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW and support permits required for the project from federal and state resource agencies. Task 2.8: Regulatory Permitting. RWQCB Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR) Permit / Section 401 Water Quality Certification. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and each of its nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) regulate the discharge of waste (dredged or fill material) into waters of the State (as defined by the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act and California Water Code 13050[e]). Waters of the State are defined as "any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state", and include waters of the U.S. including wetlands that meet the current definition, or any historic definition, of waters of the U.S. (California Water Code 13050[e]), and wetlands defined in the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (SWRCB 2019, revised 2021). Section (§) 401 of the CWA requires certification for any federal permit or license authorizing impacts to waters of the U.S. (i.e., waters that are within federal jurisdiction), such as § 404 of the CWA to ensure that the impacts do not violate federal or state water quality standards. However, when a project may impact waters of the State, alone or in combination with waters outside of federal jurisdiction, the RWQCBs have the authority under the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act (Porter- Cologne) to issue Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) to ensure that impacts do not violate state water quality standards. WDRs, and waivers of WDRs are also referred to as orders or permits. In the instance that waters of the U.S. are not within the project area, the § 401 WQC is waived, and the project proponent enters into the WDR process for waters of the State. Both pathways to permitting are RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula administered by the RWQCB. UltraSystems will prepare and submit a WDR permit application package to the San Diego RWQCB which will include (at a minimum): • Section 401 Water Quality Certification/Waste Discharge Requirements permit application form (both permits use the same application form). • Full description, including the purpose and final goal of the entire activity. • Complete project description including: o Jurisdictional wetland delineation report (if verified, the USACE verification letter, otherwise the delineation report). o Mitigation and monitoring plans. o Any other documents relating to water quality and beneficial uses. o Grading Plans and/or final conceptual engineering drawings and detailed maps. • A detailed description of all measures to be taken to prevent the project from adversely affecting the water quality and beneficial uses of the waterbody(ies) to be impacted. • Identification of the federal license/permit (i.e., agency, type, nationwide permit number, file number). • Copies of federal application, notification, agency -Client correspondence, or signed statement that none is applicable (copy of the application for a USACE § 404 permit). • Copies of any final or (if not final) draft federal, state, or local licenses, permits, or agreements concerning the project (copy of the application for a CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement). • A copy of any draft or final CEQA document prepared for the project. Typically, RWQCB accepts a copy of the Notice of Determination on the CEQA document. If the document has not yet been certified or adopted, send a copy of the most completed version of the document. Although CEQA documentation is not required for a complete application, the RWQCB needs to have ample time to properly review a final copy of valid CEQA documentation before taking a certification action. • The correct application fee deposit (to be paid by the client). Failure to submit this fee deposit will make the application incomplete. CDFW Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA). The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) regulates rivers, streams, and lakes through its Lake and Streambed Alteration Program, which protects waters of the State pursuant to Sections (§§) 1600-1617 et seq. of the California Fish and Game Code. These waters are generally referred to as "CDFW jurisdictional waters", which extend beyond the river, stream, or lake perimeter to include contiguous riparian habitat. The project will require authorization of a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSAA or "1600 permit") with CDFW before any activity that substantially modifies the bed, bank, or channel, including riparian habitat, of a river, stream or lake. An LSAA is also needed if an activity may substantially adversely affect existing fish or wildlife resources associated with CDFW jurisdictional waters. Finally, if protected riparian vegetation, usually trees, sometimes shrubs, will be encroached upon or removed, a protected tree inventory may be required (and included as a separate task). Effective September 1, 2020, all notifications for Standard Agreements (LSAA or "permit") must be submitted through the Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS) Permitting Portal for this project. UltraSystems will complete an online application package including all requested information and fees, payable by the project applicant. The project applicant (and Client) will review the final permit package prior to submittal to CDFW to begin the permitting process. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Assumptions • This scope does not include development of a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP). Exhaustive details of mitigation design, implementation, and monitoring programs are not part of this scope. Development of an HMMP will require a change order, if required. • This scope includes one permit package submittal to the USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW. Additional resubmittals due to project design changes will require a change order. • This scope assumes the project will not require a Nationwide Permit from the USACE. Preparation of a Nationwide Permit application package would require the approval of by the Client. Preparation of an Individual Permit, if required by the USACE, would require a change order. • UltraSystems will not be responsible for WDR or LSAA Notification application fees. • If work will occur in "wetted channel," then a plan to divert water around the project site and dewater the work site must be included with the permit applications and should specify the method, volume, rate and timing of the diversion. A figure showing the size and location of the diversion must also be included. Water diversion is considered a temporary impact to jurisdictional waters and must be described in the jurisdictional delineation report and permit applications. If water diversion is proposed, then the Client must provide to UltraSystems the following: o A water diversion plan that specifies the method, volume, rate and timing of the diversion of the water around the work site. o The plan must specify an estimation of the materials to be used (e.g. corrugated steel pipe with diameter, k-rails, sandbags, bubbler, visqueen sheeting, etc.). o The plan must specify an estimation of equipment needed to install and maintain the water diversion. o CAD data with a defined coordinate system or GIS shapefiles/geodatabase or Google Earth kmz/kml files that digitally illustrate the size and location of the water diversion. o If UltraSystems is to assist with the development of the water diversion plan (i.e. consult with the Client and/or agencies, write sections of the plan, provide drawings to illustrate the concept, etc.), a change order will be requested. • A hydrological study or other information on site hydraulics (e.g., flows, channel characteristics, and/or flood recurrence intervals) may be required to evaluate potential project impacts to hydrology. This scope does not include preparation of a hydraulic study or survey. • This scope does not include work specific to a § 7 consultation or § 2081 consultation regarding federally or state listed species, respectively. Specific surveys and/or consultation with USFWS will require a change order. A 30-day 'Pre filing Meeting" is required for submittals to the RWQCB, prior to submittal of the WDR permit application. The generally anticipated timeline is approximately 120 to 150 days upon the agency confirmation of a complete application, 30-day public review period, to the final hearing approving the project and permit issuance. Once an application has been deemed complete, the RWQCB has between 60 days and 1 year in which to make a decision. This does not include the time necessary to prepare the permit package or perform pre -application coordination with the agencies. Changes to the existing project description, engineering drawings, project design elements, or other such changes resulting in alterations to the existing setting, resources, impact mapping, impact calculations, and/or mitigation may increase the projected project timeline and/or cause UltraSystems to incur additional out -of- scope work, which will be billed via change order or on a time and materials basis to the client. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula • This scope includes not more than three site visits with the resource agencies. UltraSystems experience indicates that agency consultation may require an unknown number of meetings and revisions to the permit package submittals. Additional meetings, site visits, responses to comments, revisions requested by the resource agencies will be conducted on a time and material basis. Permit Coordination with the Resource Agencies. Upon the Client's approval, UltraSystems will coordinate individually with the concerned resource agencies (USACE, RWQCB, and CDFW) and conduct site visits to discuss the jurisdictional delineation survey results, project design, impacts to jurisdictional waters, recommended best management practices (BMPs), and mitigation concept. Agency concerns will be incorporated into the final resource agency permit package submittals. Coordination with the City will take place under the Biological Resources task and is not a part of this task. In addition, UltraSystems will coordinate with the Client, project engineer, the resource agencies, and other relevant parties to effectively process the permit applications. Coordination may include addressing agency comments and questions, negotiating mitigation measures, responding to requests for additional information, and any additional tasks required for package completion. Coordination may include telephone, email, or written correspondence, or meetings with the agencies. Assumptions: This scope includes not more than three site visits with the resource agencies. UltraSystems experience indicates that agency consultation may require an unknown number of meetings and revisions to the permit package submittals. Additional meetings, site visits, responses to comments, revisions requested by the resource agencies will be conducted on a time and material basis. USACE Section 404 Nationwide Permit (OPTIONAL). The amount of work associated with preparing a notification to the USACE pursuant to § 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) depends on the magnitude of project impacts to waters of the U.S. (as defined on September 8, 2023 in Revised Definition of "Waters of the United States", Conforming [88 FR 61964]) under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Most projects require a Preconstruction Notification (PCN) be submitted to the Los Angeles USACE. If permanent losses (i.e., impacts) are below the impact threshold for notification, then the project may be exempt and would qualify as a non -notifying project. However, as the § 404 permit is directly applicable to the § 401 Water Quality Certification from the RWQCB, each project will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis to provide a streamlined effort for permitting. Under § 404 of the CWA, the USACE can issue general permits to authorize activities that have minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects. The Nationwide Permit Program (2021) allows the USACE to issue general permits in the form of Nationwide Permits (NWPs) for certain activities, provided that the disturbance thresholds are satisfied. Typically, projects that result in impacts to less than 0.5 acre (this acreage varies among different NWPs) can normally be conducted pursuant to one of the NWPs. Under these circumstances, the PCN also functions as an NWP application. Activities in waters of the U.S. that involve greater than minimal impacts require an Individual Permit. Typically, the USACE will require an Individual Permit for an activity that will impact an area equal to or in excess of 0.5 acre of waters of the U.S. Individual Permits and NWPs are completely different in scope. UltraSystems' current understanding of the project scope indicates the project may qualify for a nationwide permit if the project impacts are less than 0.5 acre, depending on the NWP applied for (subject to USACE discretion). UltraSystems will complete a § 404 Nationwide Permit application package that includes all requested information, and submit the permit package to the USACE, Los Angeles District for review. At that point, RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula UltraSystems may also request a Pre -Application Meeting, which is recommended for those projects that may be complex and/or potentially controversial. The permit package will, at a minimum, include the following: • A completed application form with appropriate figures and drawings. • A detailed description of the project, including location, grading plans, and water diversion plans provided by the Client. • Jurisdictional delineation report. • A list of approvals and certifications being obtained from other federal, state, or local agencies. • Biological resources survey report. • Cultural resources report. • A Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. MAJOR TASK 3.0 - INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Task 3.1: Administrative Draft Initial Study. UltraSystems will prepare an Initial Study (IS) pursuant to CEQA § 21080 and §§ 15060 through 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines. Technical analyses (refer to Major Task 2.0) will be conducted for different environmental resource areas, as needed, and well supported responses for all questions listed in CEQA Appendix G will be provided. Environmental issues to be considered include the following topical areas along with the required Mandatory Finding of Significance. Aesthetics Topical.. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Population/Housing Agricultural & Forestry Resources Hazardous Materials Public Services Air Quality Hydrology and Water Quality Recreation Biological Resources Land Use/Planning Transportation/Traffic Cultural Resources Mineral Resources Utilities and Service Systems Geology & Soils Noise Tribal Cultural Resources Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance Energy Task 3.2: Administrative Draft MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. UltraSystems would use the Initial Study as the basis for preparation of the administrative draft MND. Mitigation measures would be selected to avoid or reduce potential environmental impacts to less than significant levels, where feasible. UltraSystems will also prepare a draft Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15097. The MMRP will specify: (1) the responsibility for implementation; (2) the timing for implementation; (3) the mechanisms of monitoring activities, including the frequency, contact and format for reporting requirements; and (4) the content, requirements and ultimate disposition of a Final MMRP. Task 3.3: Revise Administrative Draft Initial Study. After the City comments on the administrative draft IS and returns it to us, UltraSystems will revise the Administrative Draft IS and submit a Draft IS to the City. UltraSystems will submit the administrative draft IS/MND and MMRP to City staff for a two -week review and comment period. Our schedule assumes one round of City review. Task 3.4: Public Draft IS/MND and MMRP. After receipt of the City's comments on the administrative draft IS/MND and MMRP, UltraSystems will revise the administrative draft IS/MND and MMRP based on the comments received and resubmit it to the City as the Public Draft IS/MND. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Task 3.5: Prepare the Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Notice of Completion. A public notice (NOI) will be drafted by UltraSystems that will inform the public and agencies of the City's intent to adopt a MND, provide information relating to the project, its location and description, and where the document is available. The notice will also identify the public review period, where to send comments, and provide information relating to the City Planning Commission hearing. UltraSystems will also draft the Notice of Completion (NOC) that will be sent to the State Office of Planning and Research. Task 3.6: Public and Agency Review of Draft IS/MND. This task facilitates efforts to be undertaken to post, file and circulate the Draft IS/MND. Distribution will occur in accordance with a list to be provided by City staff. UltraSystems will prepare a master copy of the Draft IS/MND for reproduction. UltraSystems will coordinate the production of copies for public distribution and deliver the environmental document (IS/MND) to the State Clearinghouse. The budget for this scope of work includes the payment of any required fees and assumes the reimbursement of fees by the City. This Task will be completed via the work efforts identified below. • UltraSystems will secure a distribution list from the City and subject it to review to make certain that it includes all applicable Local, Responsible and Trustee agencies defined in CEQA Guidelines § 15381 and § 15386. • UltraSystems will prepare and distribute a Notice of Completion (NOC) which will also serve as the environmental document transmittal form to all recipients of the NOI, public Draft IS/MND, and Draft MMRP. • UltraSystems will prepare and distribute a Notice of Intent to Adopt (NOI) to the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse to announce the 30-day public review period as required by Public Resources Code § 21091(b) and CEQA Guidelines § 15073. The NOI, Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Draft MMRP will be filed electronically with the State Clearinghouse along with the Notice of Completion and their Summary Form. • UltraSystems will mail up to 25 required notices to affected agencies and interested persons or stakeholders. Mailings will be via US Mail. • UltraSystems will also have the Notice of Intent (NOI) posted in a local newspaper of general circulation, along with the San Diego Tribune. Deliverables: One electronic copy each in MS Word and Adobe Acrobat PDF format of the Notice of Completion, Notice of Intent to Adopt, Final Distribution List, verifications of document. MAJOR TASK 4.0 — FINAL IS/MND Task 4.1: Response to Comments. UltraSystems will prepare responses to environmental comments received on the Draft IS/MND. Upon receipt of comments on the IS/MND during the 30-day review period, UltraSystems would review the content of the letters to determine the nature and extent of the responses to comments (RTCs) effort. This scope of work assumes UltraSystems will prepare responses for up to 10 individual environmental comments received on the Draft IS/MND. The RTCs would be provided to the City, and after receiving one set of consolidated comments from the City, the RTCs would be finalized. Responding to more than 10 individual comments would be done on a time and materials basis with prior approval by the City. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula Task 4.2: Final IS/MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. UltraSystems will prepare the final IS/MND that will include revisions to the Draft IS/MND based on comments received. If required, UltraSystems will assist the City in soliciting and incorporating the views of Responsible Agencies regarding the scope and the appropriate aspects of the monitoring and reporting program and finalize the MMRP. MAJOR TASK 5.0 - PUBLIC HEARING ATTENDANCE/NOD Task 5.1: Public Hearing Attendance. UltraSystems will attend one public hearing for the proposed apartment home project to answer questions regarding the environmental document and impact analyses. Should environmental issues arise at this hearing requiring additional investigation(s) beyond the scope of this proposal, UltraSystems will provide the City with specific recommendations concerning appropriate response(s) and, following the City's authorization to proceed, will undertake the preparation of any additional studies that may be required because of the determination by the City. Attendance at an additional public hearing beyond the one identified above would be compensated for in as an additional service agreed upon with the City. Task 5.2: Notice of Determination. UltraSystems will prepare the project Notice of Determination (NOD) and post it after the City has certified the Final IS/MND. UltraSystems staff will post the NOD with the Office of the County Clerk within two days of the approval of the Final MND. The Payment of County Clerk filing fees necessary to file the NOD with the County Clerk and the filing fees (Yr. 2024) the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) in the amount of $2,916.75 will be paid directly by UltraSystems and be reimbursed by the City. A copy of the NOD will also be sent to the State Clearinghouse for its file. C. COMMUNITY OUTREACH & DESIGN 1) Community Engagement Memo Our team will work with Kearns & West to prepare the Community Engagement Memo that will synchronize the engagement activities with the incremental planning steps in the development of the Bike Lane and Trail Program. The memo will leverage the outreach that was previously collected for this project and ensure future activities are additive to the design process and not redundant or repetitive to the community. The memo will include: • Community engagement objectives, including the intentional involvement of vulnerable and underserved communities. • Specific topics for community discussions and input. • Needs and specialized techniques for involving vulnerable community members considered vulnerable, underserved, and/or disadvantaged communities, and community members with accessibility needs. • Simple process chart that shows alignment of specific engagement activities with milestones in the planning process, and importantly, the discussion focus associated with each milestone. • Descriptions of engagement activities and strategies for making community members aware of the project and involvement opportunities, including purpose and timing. 2) Community Workshops Kearns & West along with other members of the design team will conduct and facilitate three (3) in -person community workshops. Kearns & West will first collaborate with the project team to develop the discussion topics and questions and the overall format/agenda. Then, they will prepare a detailed logistics RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula plan, prepare materials, conduct a dry run, staff the workshop with a senior facilitator and one additional outreach specialists (including setup and cleanup), and prepare a summary that documents and synthesizes the input. The logistics plan for each workshop will become a valuable management tool for the entire team and will have sections covering the specific objectives for the workshop, date/time/location, methods for the City to use to publicize the meeting to the full range of community members and interests, annotated agenda, materials (including responsibilities for prep), meeting team and roles, and strategies for translation and interpretation. Input and feedback collected at the community workshops will be compiled into a summary report. 3) Pop -Up Events Kearns & West along with other members of the design team will plan and host one (1) identical in -person pop-up events at Ronald Regan Sports Park to "meet people where they are". The pop-up events may occur on busy park weekends when there is significant foot traffic and opportunities to engage with park users or in conjunction with an existing park event like a holiday event or summer concert. Each pop-up event will occur over a 3-hour period. The exact timeframe for the events will be discussed with Parks & Recreation staff to identify the park's busiest times. The pop-up events will include a booth with informational material (maps, conceptual drawings, etc.) and interactive activities to solicit feedback from community members. Pop-up material will be formatted in English and Spanish to ensure inclusive engagement opportunities. The pop-up events will be staff by English and Spanish speaking staff to allow for in -language conversation about the project. Input and feedback collected at the pop-up events will be compiled into a summary report. 4) Citywide Questionnaire Kearns & West, in collaboration with the design team and City staff, will design a bilingual (English and Spanish) citywide questionnaire to collect community input on trail alignments, difficulty, amenities, access, and other relevant project information. This questionnaire will complement the survey that was previously conducted for the project area. The citywide questionnaire will include up to 10 multiple-choice questions to collect design -specific information. Kearns & West will host the questionnaire on SurveyMonkey, which will be promoted via project website, social media, and flyers at the Community Workshops and Pop -Up Events. Kearns & West will provide exported data from SurveyMonkey at the closing of the questionnaire. 5) Contribute to City Website Project Page The City has an efficient, effective website with pages that hosts a range of recent and current projects. A dedicated page for this project could be added to the City's website that will be used to provide project updates, a calendar of events, links to the citywide questionnaire, and other related project information. Not only do community members already know to go to this page for information about City events and projects, but using it for the Bike Lane and Trail Program will be cost effective. Kearns & West will create the initial content forthe webpage (about three high-level paragraphs) and then provide ideas for updates that the City can make throughout the project. D. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Based on community and city staff input the design team will prepare design development plans and renderings to fine tune the concept plan. Our trail design expert Shane Wilson will study the existing topography and site features and refine the design to best fit the existing site conditions and the desires of the community. Plans, cross -sections, renderings, and a fly -through video will be prepared to clearly define the proposed design. An estimate of probable construction costs will be prepared to ensure the project is within budget. Revisions to the design will be made based on community and staff input. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula E. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS The design team will prepare a complete set of improvement plans, 100% compatible with AutoCAD 2020, for the improvements and submit to the City, utilities, and resource agencies for review, comment and/or approval. Plan submittals will be provided at the 30%, 60% and 90% and 100%. The plans shall include a cover sheet (format to be provided by the City) and all sheets shall be on the City title block. We will investigate and process all required permits including but not limited to the following: City Departments of Building and Safety, Public Works, Planning, and environmental permits, California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, studies, and determination. Coordinate with City staff to ensure consistency between project plans and the CEQA project description, and also to ensure any project design features or mitigation measures (if needed) are feasible and incorporated into the design plans. We will prepare hydrology/hydraulic report(s) in accordance with City, County and Caltrans standards for the proposed improvements. The report(s) will determine the adequacy of all existing drainage facilities that are or may become impacted by the proposed improvements and identify the need for new, modified or relocated facilities to provide adequate flood protection. Improvement plans will include: • Grading and earthwork including calculations • Storm drain facilities • Signing & striping • Erosion control, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, and WQMP • Construction phasing and detour plans • Utilities • Pedestrian bridge design • Parking lot • Site Furnishings • Landscape and Irrigation • Other related work as necessary 1) Demolition Plans Detailed demolition plans will be prepared plans illustrating the locations and limits of the proposed project and identify the location and limits of existing site features that are to remain in place and protected from construction activities. 2) Precise Grading Plans Precise grading plans will include finished grading design for the new site construction including trails, parking lots and pedestrian bridges. 3) Signing and Striping Plans Signing and striping plans will be prepared for all site improvements. 4) Pedestrian Bridge Plans Pedestrian Bridge plans will be prepared for all stream crossings. Details and structural calculations will be included. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula 5) Utility Plans Utility plans and details will be prepared for all site improvement areas. These will include utility notification and coordination. 6) Storm Drain Plans Storm drain plans and details will be prepared for all site improvement areas. 7) WQMP/LID WQMP/LID documents in conformance with the requirements and conditions for Low Impact Development (LID) improvements that are compliant with NPDES Order R8-2010-0036 and NPDES No CAS 618036 for the County of Riverside and Incorporated Cities of Riverside County. 8) SWPPP A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared for use by the City, compliant with Sections LM and XIV of the Order of the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activities (SWRCB Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ). The report will prescribe Best Management Practices (BMPs), as identified in the CASQA California Storm Water BMP Handbook as appropriate. Application fees shall be paid for by the City. 9) Electrical Plans Electrical plans and details will be prepared for all new electrical improvements. 10) Construction Plans & Details Construction plans that will locate by dimensioning all site elements. Details will be provided to demonstrate proper construction and installation. These will include the trail signs and environmental educational signs. 11) Irrigation Plan & Details Irrigation retrofit plans to water all proposed planted areas with 100% coverage. All irrigation plans will include the location, type, size and manufacturer of the proposed equipment and materials necessary to construct the irrigation system. The plans will also include all required notes and calculations necessary to demonstrate the engineering suitability of the proposed system. Pressure loss calculations, point of connection, mainline, lateral and head layout, drip irrigation layout, controller location, and flow calculations will be provided. The controllers will be ET based Smart controllers with moisture sensing capabilities, non-volatile memory. The system will be designed for a minimum efficiency of 70 percent. Details will be provided to demonstrate proper installation of all irrigation equipment. 12) Planting Plan & Details RHA will prepare detailed plans for all planting areas on the site. Drought tolerant plant materials will be used to conserve water, reduce maintenance and ensure the long- term health and viability of the plant material. Planting plans that illustrate the location, size, quantity and type of proposed plant and inert materials required to complete the project. 13) Specifications Book specifications will be prepared identifying types and qualities of materials and methods to be used in construction. These will include the measurement and payment for each contract item. 14) Plan Check Revisions and Coordination During the plan submittal and review process, all necessary revisions to the plans will be made based on RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program — Ronald Reagan Sports Park December 13, 2024 City of Temecula plan check comments from the city and other agencies General Notes We will show on the plans all existing and proposed improvements including pavement, storm drains, utilities, above ground appurtenances, landscaping, irrigation lines and fences. We will coordinate with all other agencies, utility companies, and nearby developers for all on- site and off -site storm drain(s), grading, utilities, and other underground and surface improvements within the project surroundings. We will prepare a list of contract items and an engineer's estimate, including quantity calculations for the construction of the proposed improvements. The estimate shall include detailed calculations for earthwork quantities including excavation and structural backfill and any necessary unclassified excavation. We will prepare documentation for inclusion in the bid package, to be prepared by the City, including: a list of contract items and corresponding special provisions for the various items of work using City standard special provisions where available in Microsoft Word 2021 format. The special provisions shall follow the City format and reference the latest version of the standard specifications. The City uses Sections 1 — 9 of the Greenbook for contract administration; any reference to corresponding sections in the Caltrans Standard Specifications shall be appropriately edited. We will design the improvements per City of Temecula standards, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction "Greenbook", Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Standards. RHA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS, INC. Scope of Work Bike Lane and Trail Program Ronald Reagan Sports Park Trails Project No. PW22-05 1 PROJECT KICK-OFF AND SITE RESEARCH Kick-off Meeting Field Verification including topo survey Site Research Geotechnical Investigation and Report 40 days 0 days Mon 2/17/25 Fri 4/11/25 2/17 2/17 2/17 2/17 2 Mon 2/17/25 Mon 2/17/25 3 6 wks 6 wks Mon 2/17/25 Mon 2/17/25 Fri 3/28/25 Fri 3/28/25 4 5 6 wks 2 wks Mon 2/17/25 Fri 3/28/25 6 Prepare Site Plan Mon 3/31/25 Fri 4/11/25 7 Meeting with City Staff ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0 days Fri 4/11/25 Fri 4/11/25 Mon 2/17/25 Thu 8/14/25 2/17 8 130 days 9 Project Initiation 1 day Mon 2/17/25 Mon 2/17/25 2/17 10 Project Management and Coordination 26 wks Mon 2/17/25 Thu 8/14/25 2/17 11 Project Description Background Data Collection/Evaluation 6 wksl 3 wks Tue 2/18/25 Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/31/25 Mon 3/10/25 2118 2/18 2118 2/18 2118 2/18 2/18 12 13 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment 6 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/31/25 Noise Impact Assessment 6 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/31/25 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening 4 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/17/25 Biological Assessment (if needed) 0 wks Mon 2/17/25 Mon 2/17/25 Crotches Bumble Bee (CBB) Survey Only 3 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/10/25 Focused Field Surveys for CBB (if needed) 0 wks Mon 2/17/25 Mon 2/17/25 Jurisdictional Delineation Report 3 wks Tue 4/1/25 Mon 4/21/25 Regulatory Permitting 4 wks Tue 4/22/25 Fri 5/16/25 Administrative Draft Initial Study 6 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/31/25 Administrative Draft MND and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) 2 wks Tue 4/1/25 Mon 4/14125 Revise Administrative Draft Initial Study 2 wks Tue 4/15/25 Sat 4/26/25 Public Draft Initial Study, Draft MND and Draft MMRP 2 wks Mon 4/28/25 Fri 5/9/25 Prepare NOI and NOC 1 wk Mon 5/12/25 Fri 5/16/25 Public and Agency Review of Draft IS/MND 30 days Mon 5/19/25 Fri 6/27/25 Response to Comments 2 wks Mon 6/30/25 Fri 7/11/25 Final IS/MND/MMRP 1 wk Mon 7/14/25 Fri 7/18/25 Public Hearings Attendance 0 wks Fri 7/18/25 Fri 7/18/25 Notice of Determination 1 day Mon 7/28/25 Mon 7/28/25 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND DESIGN DEVELOPMENT Community Engagement Plan 94 days 2 wks Tue 2/18125 Tue 2/18/25 Thu 6126/25 2/18 2/18 32 Mon 3/3/25 33 City Website Content 2 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/3/25 2118 34 Community Questionnaire 2 wks Tue 2/18/25 Mon 3/3/25 2/18 35 Community Workshop #1 Pop-up Event Preliminary Design Development Plan and Renderings 0 days 0 days Sat 4/26/25 Sat 5/3/25 Sat 4/26/25 36 Sat 5/3/25 37 4 wks Mon 5/5/25 Fri 5/30/25 Fri 5/30/25 Fri 5/30/25 38 Meeting with City Staff 0 days 39 Community Workshop #2 Final Design Development Plan and Renderings Meeting with City Staff Community Workshop #3 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS Prepare 60% PS&E City review of PS&E Meeting with City Prepare 90% PS&E City review of PS&E 0 days Thu 6/5/25 Fri 6/6/25 Thu 6/5/25 Thu 6/19/25 40 2 wks 41 0 days Thu 6/19/25 Thu 6/19/25 42 0 days Thu 6/26/25 Thu 6/26/25 43 185 days Fri 6/27/25 Thu 3112/26 Thu 9/18/25 44 12 wks Fri 6/27/25 45 2 wks Fri 9/19/25 Thu 10/2/25 Thu 10/2/25 Thu 10/2/25 46 0 days 47 6 wks Fri 10/3/25 Fri 11/14/25 Thu 11/13/25 Thu 12/11/25 48 4 wks 49 Meeting with City Prepare 100% PS&E 0 days Thu 12/11/25 Fri 12/12/25 Thu 12/11/25 Thu 1/8/26 50 4 wks 51 City review of PS&E 3 wks Fri 1/9/26 Thu 1/29/26 52 Final Plan Revisions 3 wks Fri 1/30/26 Thu 2/19/26 53 City Review and Approval of PS&E 3 wks Fri 2/20/26 Thu 3/12/26 Project Schedule January 9, 2025 RHA Landscape Architects -Planners, Inc. 3/12 3112 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Cost for services shall be as per Consultant's proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $673,843.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 12 01/01/2025 A. PROJECT KICK-OFF AND SITE RESEARCH B. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND DESIGN D. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT E. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ■- f The Heart of Southern CAfvrnia Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM - RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK TRAILS Infrastructure Project Project Description: The project includes the design and construction of multi -use trails in the area between Ronald Reagan Sports Park to the north, Pauba Road to the south, Margarita Road to the east, and border of the park to the west. Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs, parks, trails, and facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Scoping, environmental assessment and preliminary concept in FY2023-24. Design and initiate construction in FY2024-25. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW22-05 / 793 Level: II 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Adopted 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 715 179,285 180,000 5804-Construction 1,320,000 1,320,000 5802-Design & Environmental 58,4181 541,582 600,000 Total Expenditures 59,133 2,040,867 2,100,000 Source of Funds: 4051-DIF-Open Space & Trails 59,133 70,000 129,133 4244-DIF-Park & Rec Improvements 930,867 930,867 4240-DIF-Quimby 690,000 690,000 4002-Measure S 350,000 350,000 Total Funding 59,133 2,040,867 21100,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 118 - :c :I f o- r � - �.._ ,.-r &'1'"T%F:'q', �. 1�I� eA , \�3+ei "'.'Y` '#� ;: =Y _ =/7RRR ; �.. . -' :� �- �' '-., a r" - ".'k : .: 9i% e .•; v. i +F �� < a a ,s /7 •a 0 •c . T 3r 1._ Y s 4 iL ' • Y': e •o r. =ib - _ - r . Y. - s-�.,:• �- - �• dry. -_ - �i+ _ _ f O� {+ F .' „.\ _- �,�F�I 4 h... at ; a G - Yr M �+.. .ilk YY .l �. X - r- - - _= - ±. 3 ; �_. .; .� may. y ,Y'. + F O 'r:^F `Y''�y<' ii _' yr- is _s+.L'•.-•w - - _ ,yes_ _ _ - II��s- 0 0 �, _ p��. .' - - Fri' / 4_, _ a ~77 - i .. - I 0 to c J� oA Rom'" i` .. .. _ .. ::� ... r :i,w.-•_ - _ 1. �j _ ' . .. _ - r+c - a 0< f� -=yw- r- /7 _ - �' - d' _ 'r am F. NO �AA� �: �. -: .. .. - - .-.- ry. - J "� _ �' - - b-1- F-F.; - _ , I . .1 - . ' '� . .1 I . . _% to -.. t M. 7," ,� ;. TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL �. '.�' F' .�--� -. r /' �- �, lg• •.;• -. - -� o �v - ..'�=�. - t�=sue= : -,': 'ram BRIDGE CROSSING f f frs"''- v +33 - a \iv i �,� •. Y� w - �" ram" r r..t - .�11. '� . y f cam, \ �,- .b, � �:r ,� x-.axe@,. i' f' 1 4 , y ' � :t '% .: 4/ f `a' 1� � 'r .F". +lam. %�.. °..^�+ i _ � �-+�.-:ayS `=�- _ _ "i • ,� j'-' `J '.CF•�,°,I �.q,� .'�. �:. ': Cs � `-ram m � - I�l. .. �- r- w� : - I �a 'a.- p..�....' - -1a.. - r - - - i ' '' �. F -- i _ •. y• ` ' y�'� �:.0,. .';x.::.. ;d- ,fib, �,.,•,,,'z'"T11.. .-."-�..�:'.�^- >.ka _ _ _ .. •� - �`r .6. •,a"`'.', �,a �:�ss'��`'�+' - ,9a.�.- .n•}:: .,�} •ate c� T,.. x r - _ ..:,..w=.. ` = -e.. /; . :. - _ I .. - r< O - :may... • s '�:� { ' .?)-.:_. 'Z �'ic.: °dy _ AMTU . _ - - e �4 zc _ r ' .�u 9 5 ... :r a _ =w� h '� 4'-' n . � '1 k �� __.�t• Y , ..r_ _ .. _ ., w._ '?l _ 1i§I�? - _ - _ '1 A . �. _ 'Si v I �r s:� e c4X 4°a SIMPLE BRIDGE CROSSING LARGER BRIDGE CROSSING WITH RAILS -�"v s'� 0 � � \ -- �a 7 �� e S 0<-,. 5. �N09 f ne 11631 I IS at 0> 11 O I.>*\\\'\\\" \\ , ,, V - / ` / �NH / I 1 \ \ 'O� Y �} 'j//� 11632 / \ \\ VO 'lo / \ /-1- \\ Q Gr //+\ �o 1 , / / ✓ T N"_ MH \(/ ��\\ \\ + MH t`sx1r4 � /, � ///� \ \ x a3 x1175.4 1 / / � \ j - - � - \� I ,f \�\� \ / ,�� j / o N / �� ' ' \\\\� \+.\ / TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL \ \ \ 1 �y ` Ff \`\ + 3 \� ( I I I I�/ I I \ 1 \\ i -\1 �/ B -� \ x rr76.7 X ,4 �-� f \ `� � \\\\� �� � f //IIII/I / - � , t \ , \ \\�_yrl °�� II III: I /�/j °� \ � \ rr \\/ x 1178.7 \ \ \�\�\ k\ �( X k �I I / < �� � IIII III II J \ \�/ J•// // r ..l ``` +........ w. \�d'/r _ \ \\\ O \ / ° \ \ \ ___ ��\�\ - � I I l / / ) � 4.4 °��jl I I I I NH k \� �/ cC / I / L, __ f / \ \\ \\\ \+ Q o�\ \\�� %1 ���LCC;_-- %-�J/� ��° ��I� ��III �1 \ 15711 j xrr�.s - °\ \� \\� \\ I \ \ O zlev x 1143.7 \ �\` �� /' I 3 / \ \ 1 \ ''jam is \ d / \ . I I e\ // /f \ -_ ^ - / // / �¢ MM � \ \ \ x rr79.5 0/jf � / \ 1 \ \\ _� MM t I I X1 // t / 1 `\� J // /� /I ° \ \ ; / \ � � l 111 1 �- `.. ! / \ °p � I,- r /// // 1, •.- / 156 / 11 \ \ '�_' r 1 i \ 28.7 // Imo\ t'\ \` \\ - J ? L ,J/ f �` �- �/ // / /�°/� �� x rr4a. ° \ �y/�#f \ \ � \\ x rreoz °� V �r j �,+ q� \ »27.91 I y \�\ S ' \ f V J / r.�n r / o ly �/ //�j/// 7'" ,.,� x1148�5 i / II' �,� \ \\\ \ \\\ J �0`p ` \ U 7 V I I .a - , / 5f AOC? / �'4' / {� --i-f --� \ �� �_--___"__� \ \ -� ( I j I x 1162 �`\ iI� � " I Y k �'_ ? /� /' /�/ //� / x 11 / x 1147. \ \ \\ \ \ \\'}� iiJr� 5• � `4 r' / +/ �f � C - \\\��o � 1t�� .11 _ / � / `\ x1146.7 �\ \\ �, �---rll� 2.5 2.5 0.8S# k f Y\ \ x 11271 ��\ \ �\ t I `� x ,i8. t I ` \\ \ �' � � // 1"''m__ // /i x »47r I I ILu� # +� ._7 �X // \ \ \ V/& \\\\��x -x� s �/ x_ { , \\\ \' \ +`�\ / 4�' `�/� \�\ X- -���',I t. j _'�/ % /-� ��j✓ i //�/�f°�/ / Isa / //(� o \III, �'/, ) ." _4_4 1'+ \� 1 O \ � \ \ - / \ 6 x11484 O I f/� / j f/ �A / \ � \ AO \\ \ \\\\\\\ x116 I 1 Y �\� J /� x \ \` �- -T_�__�>� ,::: ��4 / / r � �% �\ f d / ° / f' \ \\ x117 �. - J_ , "__� 440 :5�z' IV-P 'J� 1 6 1 _�7�-� -_:��--�-5��--_ -�- - - � 7- - '-�' �� �� � No"�'� , � '.'-r(_���'_' \ \ \ , U � � f Fj%� \ \ \� I xn \,' \ \��\\� -/ j \� __7_ __ - r - - . - �� = IV- / .,� / f - � / � / / x1145.2, r \ 4 xrrsss • \ �\ \ ° ro /A. �- \ Y\� S �" � .r, � + I \ � l I f .--� � \ � * � •.. 77��' �� NH \` � \�\_�= _1 ��C ,f/% � 'l` i• � �/ J f / ''' / / \ �\ f 11;01 � x .3 •i.� - / +`\ \ 1 � k0i\\ / 1° '� cfi - j /� J f r F � l "� \ - / l i I .� ` + \ \ �i'p Z /-" I` , ,r ", � \ f \ \� _ �\ / 3�r H �s • # ,$ 0 o/ �� Tt e - ,�� r Jf� CDFW JURISDICTION \\\ #�(( ////��//7 \ /9 �� \ - = = / ��' \ /�� /// J/� j` x `'�/1E J x,,,.6 ,k' /+% \+ c��°� Q /�/ / // { // / �w ,.�`..... \\ x/ �/ x//323 \ \ \ z11551 /�// \ / �y l.a f \�./ / x1153\ / \\ \� / - \ \ C� / k, x 1117,3 ° f / f/ �'' y \ \ \ v.(.,, r ,,, : " ` ,,- f f ��\ \ � / k \ s ` ` � / �/� \ / /�/ /// ` / � f �Y f � � f � \ � ' 11 1 f xj \ +\\ � \ � � /f/ \+\ 0 _S ,,,,. •^ >f r t l\ F 7` ��"`}p�� x l3 . " z 1145 MN \ \ / ��/,�}+. >r Q� C(15� / t� x ' \ _ \ \ / // \ // /��/.,,/'� / , a 'Y t � x 1118.2 `� 1\x\ t � �V \ '\ I \ x 11582 __ �/// t - �l / x 1142-1 R- \a� o f , �.- � I I I I l \+I 'r� ,' � S \ // x � / >� f f / � { I- `\ \\�j�ji {y�\�l / /(�J / � / /7�/ ' # _ '( \ � lJ � ; �%/ #° z ` 1' � . ' } ' /// i ,,. "•� "1 f I � X i \ ; \ � \ \ / R°- ° x-/ / ^ �� / \ j / //1 .% S '`° i'f \\�Vt/ / x1131.5 �'r` f,.,/ l,y O x1134.5 �I \ �i�/// / / lx �`C #.C/`.� r"' ��j �I I xll .7 v� 4 t \\\ / j V / �� \ •....,.r "'r'\,,c \ -r-1 'ti - x 1150.3 / '1 I +fl,\ f I 117 / / \ �� \ \\'`S^A \ J \\ ll �` �13t I f`3-� -� E -%\/ ° / �/ i 1 j # \ �/ -\ f 1 i I 1 �i X \ + I �� O / _ \\ a4\ �� °( x11 f / x1144.8 E I X I I \\ TYPICAL BIKE TRAIL WITH / I > w = _ - \ _ f I wl I I I I I I I TTT�1 x»5°.5 1 �i ° I \ 11 I IIII - �� �,I I I I I #x I < \ �\ \\ // �f ,<\ 116.8 ' f _ � k_ \ > \1 � -� �k E �- 3 � w 1- V / � Irl �' .\, \ \ / \� Ix»526 ,+ ,� \ '9 �'� RAILROAD TIES TO HOLD / I I a.� ''�� I l f i x ,59 xrr,39 '1 j f \ +� . �`` - `+, r -k. ``+ 1 11 \ . `.\ \ / �' �> aX 1 �i \• C // / `�. ��/ _ / , y� � - \ + / I 7� / � " 4 �_ P I I \ I •.. / x ' \ % \ x ! }I I I J - � - I I I x ` \ # \ 1 �' O \ '/\ \ .✓ /---- .._ .,` ,- /'i L. \ T/ f F � � � � � � � �yi� I I I I tt � � � E `����y////+ � � \J �- 1 � I \ � � \ I I f ��' / r f / ,26.9 : k # \yam EXI S I I NG t ,f ''• I L L-LLL_I_ I I I I I L A I I I .J�. I. �- �•r� -- f� \ '+%X 7r;75 ' I \ x_ x---- ` \ x »5,.2 / / r f -x 1 / �r x11333 C �- - m - _ / 1 # ! %� ��\\�- �1 x � � \ 1 \ \ \ ~ \ \\ BACK EXISTING SLOPE / / k 1 / E f . �l C1130) i // / f �-•-•-- -R- a ,� / \ +\ x _ \ ' I I .^ _x � \ x / f %,� f i ) \ 3 l REC. x 3 - - -� - _ - t 7- � 1 \+\ ) xl � 3 / �7 \\ +\\ x1172.4 / \ } w � f 1C1132 � } � t � x /1 l � ° CENTER l � � -_=_- - �� - r - \� - ,/ 1 I f I I �EX/STING } m \ ` �`\ \ �i \ \ \\\\� \ , \ i �. -k-- \ ,,, /" / 1'q4 j f'� - \" '4 3,r 'w` 4 x 1133. 1 3.1 , �- LJ `i. i #� \ � '> ,L' c f _x____x__ S \ \ / \ \+ 1 i 4 8 `�, .I 1 x r •l 4 \\ + \ . \ x ll \ v } / " \ ��\+ ^� 1 fF I ,I� / �C1136)- \ v P f° r`_/1 x _ \, -� x � +/ ��� t \ I f I PUMP I �\ \ \ \ \ \\\\ \\\ \+ \ f \ 2 J r '" (y \ \` , �l J x »37 x 1r38_ ' x »,72 S x r 0 x r152.7 + \ - \ yy/ / 18 \ 1 / 1 / '.i. r _t^' -'� x»37B , x / j y x 1 \ \ # \ + \ /l �f \\�` \ tt �, _�� , ��-7� /�6 38)-17 M�'�,� �� �� l ` 1( 3 } �w %-;;%' \�\ .114' "x . I I I I i TRACK 11 z, t I I +\ / ,� o��\\\\ �\ \ f �, w f� \ 3 L ' / 3tf f \ \ ` \ �' ` %//�/ ,�j` ,�!/ r �. - # - ; ; \ \\ ---x- # e 11 °.25 i I +\'� `\ , \ `\ °f1� \ \\ \\. • f : _� \ I �'+. +\ �'" ` / r/ f ' /,/ t- x rr35.� I `\ \ + � � i I x 11 .8 \ \ \ / x 1154.1 \ --t \ \ n^ f I t �`' f\ ''' \� ti, \\ �'� + / / •. r• �_ �� \ \'\ i\� £ \\ i �x� I ^ F �' \� ) T- /- �% x »36.6 x »376 I I I \ \ \\ ( i t `� y \\ \ ti, \ \` / \\ + \ .., ° / x »71., L 1 G _ I T J I} I{� \_ t µ d _V J r I , /f/ �� - 1 •J / jj /� C \ \ \�� / x ' MH o 113 . r / x 11 x , t \ I ( I �'� " / �Jf�1 1 1 ^I �° 1-� \ + V' \ NH M J f f � / 1 .l f f f ��/ /# - Y � / j�\ 9 \� S \ \ / x \E 1 f�\ I I \ S \ i `\\ / 5# I %� �- -x-. * _ ' \ `� \ \ \+ + \ \ \S\\\\\ \ \\\\ \ f� � t � I t ) '' �` + / '` , . # - - / � /`� - \ \� `\ lll�� � 0 "' = - \ 1 PI V \ +\, j EXISTINall436 I \ I I I --x-- I I $ # I # xrrs L) '\\ \� \ \ \ \ / + f/ f Y ( t �' '/ >� 1 \ - r, ^ \ \ ` \ \\\\\ h C� # 1 f j \x, x 1, I 1 \ \ C\\ f \\ l -X:iD ® �I ,- x, J . I \\ \\t ., (� i\� ''' -� 4 �' \, +� � � I 1 xIx1137.2 \ \x 1146.E _��� BALL FIELDS i �, - p x 1147.E --r� x rrso.3 O y \ + \ + x �' x nls / , � � _ � 1 r % / �S 1 � \\ \ ' S / f � --� \ 1 II I / \ + \ / # I I I # I I \ L ✓ \ 'i, \ \+ �' \ \ \\ \ n x \+ I I z % x 1138.7 )+- \ g}• ,tl' �/•✓ © ( \ / 0 �` \ �P x 1152.7 4kA, \ \ / - I ( .r/9/ / C,. t _4:� .�.,, / ///\ �/�1�, '`6`,� \ \\ \ , / " J fS I I pp1 7 I / k I s f o \\` \'.. ..^ \ ` / i4 \ \°-' �.... fr // S /�� �Y / / /'/ \� \�� `�, 3732. �\ ( y II I� I_.-�� \ \ ' / \ ' / y I I I -_+\ /� \�\\ \\ \ \ x1170.6 _ / `� J/ /�//\1 /)N�"/� x ��\�-i 5� Dc 71f 11327 \ t j ,fILia4k-+ ,, Ali,/ x 1116.8 r.r' �/ / - T / / / \ \ \ �,� / �"` \ \� /� 9./! I \ \ \ I 5 f I I x -� �- \ \+ \ I \. \ ,�c'C�' \\ \\\\\ // f f �� �r ``r i l f - _ - _ �� �\\� \� �l �� . \ S\ t I x »377 \+ x »37r _ / \ I E I I� ` - `��� /y ��ARR�11 VG \A I/AILABLE TO THE \ x »5,.2 ,, ) \\�\�\\ \ / tr 1 / r+' i 'ia. / /� \\ C �� \ \ \ \ \� +�, -�." ; I I # \ \\\ / x 1135.7 �+ ' \ \ // x 1144.8 „.. x 11489 I j % - ''' d1151G$�... " -, / r `r.J f \ \\\\\\ ° �-_� .. - - -_ / \�� 1 \ \\ +. I \ \ I I#x TRAILHEAD \\\\ `° �� �� / / f �x l �" = - - - - /\� \� � \ x _ + f ! / ; /' i NORTH. SHARE WITH SKATE '� ,� \ / / -- J / \ \� \ % � EXISTING x 1 . __x___ x�_ �- / x x»36.6 zrr387 I EXISTING � , \\\ / f OUT w L / g/ / �j // �// J - \` \\ - -^ \ IZr \ \ \ \i I I x-- I --- \ __x L-_ x__- _x- \ \\ \ I I / k;� // J+x • �/ t`` �. x11527 = E' \\\ / /I J / N t / / �� - - UU ��- - - - \\ ✓� ? \\ x x---- I---x-= \ \+ / , $ I j SKATE / ►� \ A K AND SHOO EY RINK _--x = '%� F / I \\ \ \\\ \� f �/ // /� r % - I _ - = = = \\�� `�'7ld \ \ ? ° I" I x \\ �/) �I I I TRACK l "�j� C �/ \� �~, = X % z ``� \ \\ tf f BACK � %� // // / / - _ \ \ , �\ \\ � \ , \ PARKING ®' 1� I EXISTING `"\_ \+ i E # \ � /�� / \\\ \\ ` O �, x 1A5 / /� \\_ x 1137.5 1 \ / t426 _ r , f '' g' � j / /{/� // 110� - - _ _ - _ \\ \ �` - \ 2\ \�\� ` - + > \\ I I #\ / +' ' I / / / �' .11 EXISTING " - i \ �\ �� ) / y G T� \ k 1 / / f t' >�f •-,_ / / } L°�,6 , /_ L1 // / \ \/ \ '\ I + x----x---_ \ \\\ / jI i / / / I k x r , ' \ l ,� / /� // / - - _ _ \ \ \ d' �� \ \\ �E // 1- I I I BALL FIELDS 1 \ ( IL if \\ \ \ N \ /1/ /// + �- \\\ �* \\� / / - \ \ `L \ \ // { / I I ' k ( HOCKEY �� `� \ f\\ \ y f 1 \ (` r /�.,/✓� // .--- .�'--I �^. 1 I \ x 11433 ) x i '✓// � � f � �titi� 20� f f / / // / / %% $o� / /j �i!7 sM'� l x,299.7 x x _-x e \�III \\ \\ \ � \ \ \\ \< \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ fit �/ 3/ �� 1 I # KI /% f \ x 11373 ` +::\ I t x,1, /1 %/ J , ARENA �� � , � ( � \ � � \ �\ # \ r � 7 l +, \ \ \ + \\+ \\ ( ti (/ / /i �� C11 // // / 1 /\ \ \ \\ '�\\ - \ - �� I l l f \+ Il I - \ \ f/// .� �jr�\\ I/ L1 / �j / / / 1 x 1210.7 1 \ \ x l I x 1138.E x 11358 k # / # x rr488 I\ x 1 47.j �(I l l ,,.. , x 1156.E \ --�-*/ 1 /` / // / / // /+✓.% rrf '� 1 \ + \ \� 1 I. / I /+/ I \ \1 \\ +,� ,.. / \� \+\ } J T e k � \ `i� \ L \ \ ' \ �' �i � \\\ \\\ \ \ /� f _ u� 1 INTERMEDIATE o� /�INSTALL BRIDGE TO CROSS I k !� \ \ \ / \ \\ \\\\\\ '\// // C11 /j �` I I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I // \ I �� / I \ \ \ \ wf \ 4 %f ,, �� \ \\NN l _ // \ 11 r f /t / w� / /// �TRAII NO. 2 //�O� !� J I 1 II I I 1 \\ \ l �\ m x11383 \ f \\ x1135.9 l/ ' \ V /[/ X,,,2S I �� / �/ �i/ c12 i , 00 ' - / E \� I 1 \ \ \ � ` EXISTING CHANNEL AND STAY \ \ / ,� 1 t \ J \ _ �'� / ° , �\ \Xll \ \ �\ -� �' / / / \ \ �\\\\\� �\ �\\ I 1 1 2 \- 3 TRAILHEAD / r k �:, + . f F ,- £/ / / / / % ,- f� , - 1 1 \ \� \� \\ \\\\ \ OUT OF SENSITIVE AREA. \/ # �, �i / / / i / I +, �� �- \\\ �� \\ ////� ��� �\\\ `., x x rrr 4 �//. /// l / / / f \ ` \ \ �j \ � 1\ 1 f I _ ` I / // / / �/ .. \\\ \ 4 _��i i ?: / \ �\ \\\ / ,» // �j j/ _ ,Y'_ M - \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ .1 \ I I ✓ / a �x� / \ , k I \� .x � '.- �'� \\ \ , -- y / / \ \\\\ r \ \\\\// x_, /� \\ \ \ \\ \ \ \\ \ I DRAINAGE D/ TCH \ - x _ , 57 \ \, / / \ \\ \ \\ �I )l 1 \ ff f f ////�� ///�+- i� \ x12185 / \ \ \ \\ \\ �1 i II I x1138.3 , l I + CROSSING �` �_ \\ \ f! /13 / / / / // \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ 13 \ '�\ # \ . WOOD BRIDGE/1 �; r �/� / \ M \� /// / ' I j' r� / f / / ��j� j/��/ / �"/ %\ x 1209.9 �. # •- \ /�\\\\\\\ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ \ -) �11-= \\ �i" l x rr376 x 1136.2.\\+ x j-1 ° x »36.9 \ �'�"ui� s' # / / / \ \\\ �l \\ \� \� __// '_� ' \ x r \\ /F �� / /,�g /// /I�//� �� / - - \ I x\ , \\\� �\ \ \ �\ 6j \ - \k��_ g%[/\��+ = ri /ice - \�\ 1 # i f� /� \\�.'� 1 \\\�-- / \ \ `` \� � x ' /� // / �// x 12052 I //�� jl� \\\\ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ ` 3 f �� // �/ /,/J) f Zoe, -�� ��i/�//� - f \\ - X \ x I - / \ \ \ >� E / ° \� r \� \ _ \\\\ \� - i // % o� �// ///�/ �/ �� \ 1 \ y� , 1 x,2,2.7 \ `�\\\\\�\ ��\\\ \ \ \\ r S� \ \ �� =- % \ / % 70) _ M \\\�\\ y--�� / / \\�\\ \ \�'* /�i f/ \` L�1�/ //���� ���� // \\ i \\ / / x� �\ l { ' x 121. // / / \ \ \ 1\ \ \\ s- \ (�' '\, jlg 26 \ / -� m� .r 1-` yc- �_ / j i / / / - / _ w �B -� \ \\ \ . rrsez / J \\\\ \\\\\\\ \\-/ 1 // /////// / / / \r/ z- \ ° of elf I/ \\\\\\\\\� `\ ),III �i\\ '11Sp\1^6J -- \- ., 27L \ I< -s,,,. / ///i / - / j-clls0)�; -.:__ - �.-�' _ ��i �/ Z \ \ \\\\\\ / / / / �� \ M�\ \ x 1114.9 // 1/� \ \^ 1 .- I J \ \ \ / / / �- .\ _ r' _ \ x \+ ° / �. / _ I I \ \ � T l �- � � # � �\ \\ � EXISTING / f ����� \ , / /® �' _'� �x o \x---'x_\ o �° f' �4))� 1 ``II,/ll�l�)��� �\ \ \ \ Q f __ � - :r �/ 3- - //�; = �, � � _ \ \\\ \ x»5 f%///// �»\�\ _x ����:1 ��� '� x1 o \ ; - x ° f x12, ll > �>J, l /-, .� „ ! \ \ _ / _ /� �6 ��\ f \ \\l SOCCER / % \ / /// / / / r \ \ // ( , ° o . - o o �. �� / / , - �\ �. r �� \\ \ 1 111\ �t,-44.6 FIELD .116a4r///j/ , \\+ . f /� ///%����//�//� %// \� 1 o \ \ o °a �\ �� ���7' �/� lI J I I I I \ \ \ BEGINNER _ _ _ - / / ` ,..� f `ti/ / I \ -� / 3 % BEGINNER/�� = \ x \\ / %�ti1� o, S f / / �/� �V ���// // z TRAIL NO. 1 \ \ 9 - _ - - - ' / / i / / - \ \f `ti f /// /l L / \ \ r l / \ C114 - i ��) 3 \ `` ��// / \ M f t�j/// / O/ \ x120 / / / / \ -- I \ \ /� 'y i- \ \ // �� / / �- % T _ // -TRAIL N0. 1 / �/ �\ \ x 59 / % // /%% / ' 't � / - � ` \ \ \ �° { r \ V �/ \ \\ \ r \ 0) , �/ / / / I I I k / f /ti //o// --� \ x122 . t / 1 ( / \ ' --� - �\ r I INTERMEDIATE l J ( '\ �ti o \ 1 1, /� / /////// \ I \ \\ ( / \ l of - - C116o) f � - / / / /// � f ,Y / //L \ ////- 2 0 \ I `\ II 4 1 r �/ /iii / / f_ � \ � x121. IIII/ \ \ \� < �\ - - / / , � _ � / // \ 6 it ll � I (TRAIL NO.. ll //lam \\\ \ f�/ i �� ? /i�i� tl / / �/� / // > � � ( x -- °° °°x12M..3 x1210..3 \ \ \ \\ v-\ INTERMEDIATE \ \ \ DRAINAGE DITCH � ti� / % - `ti / / // fl � '< �\ \ �/� \� f / / / �+ t x \ _x �x 1 \-...� \ \ \\ I I \ L / / / VC11 / / " / / I// �\ ffRAILHEAD , t i- \\ / //� � Z ��° /+ \ I / � / /� // .- If ` \-1 �\ x=' / � � �' l�/// \�\\� \ \ r\ \\\ \ � \ � l TRAIL NO. 2 CROSSING_ / / %� // //' __ � - 60)_ � �--- i - /// / / �� � l/ l//' t /I I \�III�[ '1 �� \ \ o'�16�8 \ � / �\��%////, ��� �/ / /� �n� �i} l x1212. \ l / J , -� � / \ Y� 1 )) / I I C' I J/ 'l//\ /i////// +f \ / 7 ° f 4 /° I \\ \ �� / i� C1160) _ - / /� \ r F / II\\\\ \\ ° / / /�/// 1 \ .+ / / /ll (l� I \��//l/ f l l \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ N OD BRIDGE - //�ti// _ - �F` - ' ��� , / % _ _ 11 INTERMEDIATE�/l I I ��� I i (���� \ \� \ / .r %////// /////�j= -, o° \ f I// / x 9 . I x ; xl2ros \ �J \\\ \ ^1\ \ - \ / �� - '- l i 70) i / �_ / C I I \ / \ / r + /"`+ //' / 1 / .� x11913 11 \ 1 / r \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ 4 / i -� / .�11 - / / / // / 4 1 S I \' �� \ \ \ / / / / Ga -�, 3t , f ( � , -,. l� ,�- \\\\\ \ \\ \ \\ \ r � �- 4 - 1/ BLUE STREAM CROSSING i - / / �/ TRAIL N0. 3 ��/ �/ `- � I I �, E �\ \\\ \ �\\\ \ `� �;,F1.. ° \ / ,r-'�//��/' �_ �/ �. -k 'x ]7257 I% II I 1 \ EXIST 1NG .,,.. "\ ✓ \ \ 1�� \ f I I 1 / / / / x 1201.7 t \ \ \ \ \ _ �, 3 / / /�/'//\-� ,III I x k � \ \ \\\ s Z�- - / _ _ / / II \\\ ' �// / I , I 1 I - \ \ X ° I \ \ \ \ \\ i \ \ \ \ o / �- -` �117 / -WOOD BRIDGE TO CROSS / / - _ // / t �. o .rr //�/i� ( / ' / \ 11 1 \ \ \ \ CHURCH 1� \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ / o�. - - _ / - - �� / \ �-- \\ \ \ 11 % / //� = 1� �\11 r 1 \l1 \ \ \ x121 \\\\\ \ \ ,�, INTERMEDIATE ��/ �\ \,= -_ _ - ___ >rf /�� r \ \\ J I i \ \ \\ o� �o �// �i�_ //// / / �� / xr22r. \ ( t '', `x x \\ r O / \\ \ \\ \ \\\\��'�� ��\ \ \ \ \ \ \ �.J 01 3 \ ��\ _- �� / / / / // / / // \ ''< \\ ) 5 1\\ \\ \\ \\\\f \\ ' "�J'sr'�- �" /// % / / / / / �� \ \� " 'a; x//932 \ \ \ \� \ /� 11 \l \ \ \\\ \ \ / C1100) _ / / / /// _ = y C �/ �/ / / / �= /_ f ,� .� \ \ / o + ��, x,2,2. � \ II\1 \\\1L,.. __�\\ \ � TRAII NO. 3 �titi/6o�� � / / � �, i � - _� >r� �\ \ �` /i / % � ,� / � 1 `� l ^-, I \ �\ •"_`T:--�.=--- x \\ 1 �l \ x1206.9 o x1 ' ��\ \\��-��\\\\\ \\ _ �C11 i S - =5( / i _� / �f INTERMEDIATE \�# ,C1180) \� a..rf� �/ / /---z , / , \ / �_ \ _ �--x____ �\ \IIIII \ \ I` �\\\ \ \ \ \ \ - /.��, � - - _, _/ / // /�/�� -,,- - ( ��� w 3A _ �-L�\\ \\\� � _ �i�% - ����r f o> _ \\ �\\ f NM ' \ / �o/ �� 4 -- = i / / -� / //%`- -'= \ TRAIL N0. 3A E \ c1 / / - w \ \ \ 1 /� � /� / \ \\ 190- / // /- / / �\ f �11 �TRAILHEAD ��\\ _ _90) \ �ti / II z \ \ ��� \1 / �� / _ - / - / / / /\ z 1136.E '\ \ �� \\ C140 z� ��� �� .�, o ° // \ I \ �L. \ \ \� ,-<ii /C11i % r j // \ / % \\\ \ 1 - �� /�/// / ���� % \ , `-d ' /y� --� C11) _� ��� �\ # l Ili 1 ` I� i \ w \ 1 \ \ /�)�i.,�,,�- // -\\\ DRAINAGE DI TCH i /// /�� \\ \ �' I \ �\ / / ; �� - -7\ \ o) � - --� � ��\ 39 f ° /l/ J I \ � / / C119? ° -� / /r /�r �\ ` ' \ \\\ \ \\\ r\ / \ -C� = _ ` _/ / / � //ice \ \ I -w/� _ �, c , - �k x,205 # , -! 1 1 1 / f °� / // \\� INTERMEDIATE /•' " , \ \\\ . �� , - t I \ - o) - = -_ � - ; " / \ L )J r \ / C116 / / - -\ x 1204.7 � � \ � 00) - �� �� / �j 'j - _ f�11� \ ` 11� �`,� II �a��\ / - '� i lZoi �� �1 ! \ /CROSSING �� �� \ r �f I/ 1� \� \ -c121 = _ _ �/ ���/; \ \+ // - (l \ o� / /�cll�o)- �� lo) \�o Tj14AlL N�5� // EXISTING \ w \ d.-�- -_ I - . _ _ _ _ / / - / o MH ' NH 9 ' ° x, n M__'T ��Iq))�ww 11 I \ \ \ // % c 2 / ' \ o�� �- \ (W00� RIDGE) _ -~ �+ o \�N \ rn \ -- �� _� �� _ / o� ��� sx- \ 1a# / r.��N I \ \ /i /�C� r' `� / // j ��\ �/ �i l . �� FIR 1 \\ J �\ `= \\-C1220)� _ / f / / \ I I I - \ " - 00 I r �_� //. / i # - I \ / -- �_- \ { = 1230)- - _'___� - 4�1 N \ ./ 1�)�'����� \ / •,ti �_ ( x r \ o // _�� / ,s- , ,' DEPT. ..r 1*4'l 1 ` -- \ c '- MM f { \ \� \ I I \ \\ // / `� /) I \ / �%/ ,Z2 "`s I # 1 L� L � _-x-�Ir- II IIII \� II \\ \/�/� --� ��I - 5 �� \ \ If, o \ ` _ ___ _ _ -� µ _--- _ ----_% �� _ �� �~ 1w F III I v n \1\�\\ 1 Il� \ � �/ / J� EXISTING `/ �'� / - / "L o _ ---x-- -X- -x--- x -x-_ x / �j /\\\+ _ r __ �= ' / NM �� n \ r 1 I IIIII 1�\ �\ --\\ \ \ ' I I �r � \ _x/ ,' / #� �'�_ - - `/�/_ \ \ ,' TRAILHEAD \ ` \ EXISTING w-..� \ , x 12 -\ 1 t,,, ��f _ x X- _ - - - \ ��\\a I 1 II / LIBRARY n _�- F?OAD _.. f / i� >- ---- { _ \ �\ N t I \ J I I I \ �\\ \\\\ \\ \4 f / I I (I ` \ //`� �ii%//%//��/ I �� y i _ PAU13A -��- _ \�%�, << /� �� , t -� - - `' :; - _-_ _ - �,� \ y \\ � I \ ' \\N \�\\\ \ \ \ I� \ �� PARKING / LIBRARY f �� �-� -s �''` � ,� / ��'\4 �\ -_ , - _�_ - N \ I .� "`�-TRAILHEAD / - -- \ / / �I � r _ --- -1 - __ gyp' ( \ // INTERMEDIATE - -�� �\\��\\ TRAIL? \ \ ��/ , o '� � � \` } � �/ �� a� II / �� �,� .x �� - x _ ��- ��\ l \ / �� /moo ° �- IIkII # I ; ' f r X -x-� +:'� - �' �'' \ s' \\ TRAIL N0. 4 \\� XING \%/� �0 22% f I �it\� �� �' \` ' J� f xr 7 Fr _ / I - �_- ( �1\� / 1; # { �, I + -x=• -`a_� i % ` 1_�_� \ \ `� \. ` '/ 1\ �- - `- \\ \\\\\\ �� v i // \\ \w� � o- ... f_� �,.�., / �� K` ��� <� � \\\\\ / // x123, J + �-v� l k*/ ��% �` �_� �� O� » i _ J /� / 1I\\\=\�\\ \ 1 I ! �� N / /� R ///�` \\ °- \� y q o / -tv .f i I / I °o / / �� �� '-� _ 4 \ \ / I\\\� \. \. / ' \ x 12,1 �� oo / s j I fl ❑ ✓ 7 /' \\\\\\ �/ / 1 \\� O NO Y� I , t E 1 +/ �i��� --� \� - / \ l`-:�\�\C122o)\T�\ 16� a „ q /� '`��r w #_I o / {►i \\ \\\ / lll��lll� C `1 4 (� 457�� � �t 7� / eGl // I ��� _\ �� ` -'r \� \C ��� I I I b / o € x 3.3 r I z1237. JI I I I \ �1\ / / I_ f //l/ _if _ _ _�� - �� Ic'3\ / I I 1 °' ` / ° 1 f F ) r I F ` I \\\\\\\\\�\� t \ L o < PARKING f////�/ 4 \I i ��4a� \ I� , > 11 _�' \ \\ \\\, \ \,�� \ \( ° aammnnn ✓� �� r I / ° 1��� +1 Jk) f I11I11\ fix/ x•`/ °� I x1MH 4 ILL xtif �/ / J -�/_ - � NO PARKING AVAILABLE FOR �� ��\� Lk o f 4w �I '` 2 \\ 1 \�_ r ;.C12oo> � � \ � I $ /i/ I I � "'1,1 I m fC - 3 - _ _ =�\ \\ �; x12436 1 i // 1'� I II I - € MN M EXISTING MWD ACCESS ROAD. CAN THIS THIS TRAIL HEAD LOCATION. ��� ��\IZ4\ -i t� �\ `�. ���_ -� ` _ \ o ,, j i �' ,.5 x12531� II /,�� 1 \ --- '�- ( f,}{/y/rf� 4 AREA BE USED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS t� f /11-1 - - \�\ �� _ ���cl l 2 - l�"C �)3 ;'�x125 i J_ � �r� =x l PROPOSED LOWER PARKING AREA? o I I \\ - f I �; x �1 )�I � � 247.9 \_\� \ � - - �� _� �C1240) � _ �- � / / -�e. �` -� I - - Z � ���/'' CL NEW PARKING � _ _\_ --- ---_ ' __ ��7zc x 1238.9 \\V 1� f �'' 1 \ ` - Ix 259z/ / / /� .>r / /�' LO NEW PARKING AREA FOR HIKING/BIKING / / / DRAINAGE DITCHES HERE A.D.A. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AVAILABLE `r/-e I�\ / } x,252.� ,�� n r, � ," r / / -1 /_ ' - ,�w '� x 24 -- f .� �>, i nI I �� _ -_ = \\\�I < /��� 1 �%-� � £ I I I I I II o� '_ I IIII _ _� � �,C"� xr229.r f, r 1 I� l I (� IIIII 1 // II II _ _� <� I I /// %IP57¢ �r IIIII I I = ��\\���1�� Av I //'�' ) I,ii// l l� I� _ ����`�� rL I I I I l � Ill l' �/ /,�j C F %///,' \\ l ) �/,i///// ice-\ _'il///r�// N �- N ■ N 0 U I k i z O � [n J PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING11 RONA D REA GAN SPOR RK - CITY PROJECT NO. P 2205 41 689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 1 28 � Temecula, Ca. 92590 ct 951-895-8900 N Item No. 8 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 28, 2025 CALL TO ORDER at 7:10 PM: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Kalfus, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PUBLIC COMMENTS — None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Kalfus, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 10. Approve Action Minutes of January 14, 2025 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of January 14, 2025. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:13 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 11, 2025 at 5:00 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 9 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Erica Russo, Director of Community Services DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Sponsorship Agreement and First Amendment for Various Nonprofits for Use of City Facilities PREPARED BY: Rishann Clermont, Community Services Supervisor II RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve sponsorship agreement and first amendment for the following nonprofits for use of City facilities: 1. Temecula Valley Genealogical Society — Agreement - $8,272/ 1-year 2. Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club — First Amendment - $1,440/ 1-year BACKGROUND: The Community Services Department is committed to providing high quality events, classes, programs and activities for Temecula citizens and visitors. This also includes working closely with our Nonprofit community who offer other services and benefits for our residents. These nonprofits bring added value to our community by offering unique subjects and specialties that City staff and programs cannot offer. Each nonprofit group will host a yearly seminar, event and/or activity, open to the public, to showcase their areas of expertise. The costs listed above for each of these agreements are limited to the cost of providing in -kind support in the form of facility rental space and staff support. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact as all sponsorship is in -kind support. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement with Temecula Valley Genealogical Society 2. First Amendment with Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TEMECULA VALLEY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 11T" day of Feburary, 2025, by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Temecula Valley Genealogical Society, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall hold meetings or classes (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") each month, except August at the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library (room based on availability) as follows, or on alternate dates pending facility availability as determined by staff. Future dates will be determined based on room availability determined by Staff. a 2"d Fridays — 3 hours • 4tn Fridays — 3 hours a 2"d Mondays — 3 hours Meetings are open to the general public for members of the Nonprofit to conduct business. Staff will set up and break down meetings. iii. The Nonprofit is responsible for clean up. b. The rental includes set up and break down time. C. The Nonprofit is permitted to book rentals for the year. d. The Nonprofit will host one yearly event open to the public. e. Alcohol will not be served. f. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of all above mentioned activities/events, providing in -kind support including facilities and staff support as described in Exhibit B. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on February 11, 2025, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 06/26/2024 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in -kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Eight Thousand Two Hundred Seventy -Two Dollars and No Cents ($8,272.00) as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co - Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor, the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement. 5. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons and/or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of work by the Nonprofit, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an "occurrence" basis, including products and completed operation, property damage, bodily injury, and personal & advertising with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 05 09 or 25 04 05 09) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Concessionaire has no owned autos, covering hired, (Code8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with limits no less than One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury, including death, of one or more persons, property damage and personal injury. 3) Workers' Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer's Liability Insurance with limit of no less than One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Section 3700, every contractor will be required to secure the payment of compensation to it's employees. Pursuant to Labor Code Section 1861, Vendor must submit to City the following certification before beginning any work on the Improvements: I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for worker's compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this contract. 06/26/2024 By executing this Agreement, Vendor is submitting the certification required above. The policy must contain a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. b. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions must be declared and approved by the Risk Manager. c. Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Nonprofit's products and completed operations of the Nonprofit; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Nonprofit Insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used). The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Nonprofit's insurance and shall not contribute with it. This also applies to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies. 3) The Nonprofit may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the limits as required in this agreement. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true "following form" or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability Insurance. 4) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect the indemnification provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees, or volunteers. 5) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 6) If the Nonprofit's maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Nonprofit. 7) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 8) Unless otherwise approved by City, if any part of the Services and Tasks is subcontracted, the Minimum Insurance Requirements must be provided by, or on behalf of, all subcontractors even if city has approved lesser insurance requirements for Vendor, and all 06/26/2024 subcontractors must agree in writing to be bound by the provisions of this section. d. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance required above, except for workers' compensation insurance, must be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. e. Verification of Coverage. Nonprofit shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements, or copies of the applicable policy language affecting coverage required by this clause. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Nonprofit obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. f. Special Risks or Circumstances. The City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 6. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 7. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 8. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 9. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: O6/26/2024 Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To- Recipient: Temecula Valley Genealogical Society Attn: Barbara Perez 27475 Ynez Road #291 Temecula, CA 92591 tvgspresident@gmail.com 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 16. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 17. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The General Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 06/26/2024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Zak Schwank, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, General Counsel TEMECULA VALLEY GENEALOGICAL SOCIETY (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: 6 P',' Barbara Perez, Presid By. Lh J J Calavan, 1st Vice President NONPROFIT Temecula Valley Genealogical Society Attn: Barbara Perez 27475 Ynez Road #291 Temecula, CA 92591 City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: 06/26/2024 EXHIBIT "A" TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR Temecula Valley Genealogical Society shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements, press releases, posters and flyers or other promotional material. • Host a yearly event open to the public. 06/26/2024 EXHIBIT "B" IN -KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Temecula Valley Genealogical Society meetings. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event and include staff support for room set-up time and breakdown costs per year. Library Facility Rental Fees: TOTAL VALUE: 8,272.00 272. 06/26/2024 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND TEMECULA GRAPESTOMPERS SQUARE DANCE CLUB THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of February 11, 2025, by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club a California Non-profit corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On January 8, 2024, the City and Nonprofit entered into that certain Agreement entitled Sponsorship Agreement, in the amount of $1,440.00. b. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to December 31, 2025, continue in -kind City staff support valued at $1,440.00 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. follows: 2. Section 2 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than December 31, 2025, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "CONSIDERATION" is hereby amended to read as follows: In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in -kind city -support services at an amount not to exceed Two Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Dollars and No Cents ($2,880.00) as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 4. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Recipient: Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club Attn: Agnes Gaertner 45620 Calle Cuero Temecula, CA 92590 1 08/09/2024 To Recipient: Temecula Grapestompers Square Dance Club Attn: Agnes Gaertner 45620 Calle Cuero Temecula, CA 92590 5. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 08/09/2024 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES TEMECULA GRAPESTOMPERS SQUARE DISTRICT DANCE CLUB (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Zak Schwank, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By By: A es Gae r, President By: -a" LV'L Randy aley, Vice FZ4sident Peter M. Thorson, General NONPROFIT Counsel Temecula Grapestom erp s Square Dance Club Attn: Agnes Gaertner 45620 Calle Cuero Temecula, CA 92590 amWemec u la(ammail.com 08/09/2024 ATTACHMENT A Exhibit B In -Kind Services Estimated Value of City Support Services and Costs Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Non -Profit meetings. The follow expense can be anticipated for the event: CRC Rental Fees for 2024: $1,440.00 CRC Rental Fees for 2025: $1,440.00 TOTAL: $2.8 UM O8/09/2024 Item No. 10 CITY OF TEMECULA/TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/TCSD Board FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager/Executive Director DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance/Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2025-29 AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024- 25 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SALARY SCHEDULE RESOLUTION NO. CSD A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS BACKGROUND: In accordance with Budget Policy II.B.- Interim Reporting, City staff conducted a comprehensive Mid -Year review of its Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Budget. The purpose of the review is to analyze revenue and expenditure trends to identify variances from the Adopted Budget and ensure that the City maintains a healthy fiscal position. The Mid -Year Budget includes a review of all City funds. The requested adjustments are summarized in the attached exhibits and discussed in further detail below. MID -YEAR �LIGHTS: The attached Mid -Year Budget Update reflects adjustments to revenue projections to better align with the current economy and revenue trends experienced through December 31, 2024. Appropriation adjustments are reflected in the attached FY2024-25 Consolidated Mid -Year Requests, which summarizes each request by Fund and Department, and are described in further detail below. Also included are three Capital Improvement Program adjustments requested to better reflect the most recent cost projections for these projects, as well as one new capital project request. GENERAL FUND: General Fund Revenue includes a decrease of $219,841, bringing total FY24-25 Revenue to $110,573,306. Major adjustments by revenue category are noted below: • Sales Tax — decrease of $1.5 million to reflect current trend in sales tax receipts, which are coming in below budget projections and below the prior year. • Property Tax — increase of $499,059 due to increasing property values. • Investment Interest — increase of $1,236,805 to reflect the higher earnings received to date and expected future returns. • Licenses, Permits and Service Charges — decrease of $321,716 due to slower development activity than anticipated in the Adopted Budget. • Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) — decrease of $275,803 to reflect current trends plus the anticipated loss of TOT related to the addition of Temecula Creek Inn to the Pechanga Tribe reservation. General Fund Expenditures include an increase of $2,017,185 bringing total Expenditues and Transfers Out to $112,874,002. Major adjustments by expenditure category are noted below: • Salaries and Benefits — increase of $235,801 to reflect the addition of two new full-time authorized positions (Assistant Director of Community Development and an Office Specialist in the Fire Department). • Fire and Police Contracts — decrease of $500,824 in the Fire Contract due to a temporary reduction in CALFire rates and a $300,000 decrease in the Police Contract due to vacant positions. Two new Fire Inspector positions are included in the Fire Contract, with the majority of their costs offset by incoming inspection revenue. • Operations and Maintenance — increase of $426,480 due to increased capital outlay related to the purchase of new vehicles to support additional Fire Inspectors, and an increase to the Staffing Continuity Reserve. • Transfers Out — increase of $1,949,350 for the one-time deposit of funds into the Insurance Fund ($1,172,672) and the Workers' Compensation Fund ($436,678) to enhance self -insured retention reserves. Additionally, a transfer of $340,000 is requested to increase the funding to the General Plan Update capital project. General Fund Ending Fund Balance is projected to be $38,608,619, with Reserves fully -funded at $25,061,179, which represents 25% of the Operating Expenditures. As illustrated on the chart, General Fund is projected to be fiscally stable and Fund Balance is expected to exceed the Desired Reserve levels over the 30,000,000 ensuing five-year forecast. 20.00o,co° MEASURE S FUND: General Fund 5-Year Projections Fund Balance Trend FV191° "V a1 4V1.1-1' FV11'13 FV131d f1111' VI15-0 f 120' FVT7-28 120 — Fund Balance —Funded Reserve O Desired Reserve Measure S Revenue includes an decrease of $395,089, bringing total FY24-25 Revenue to $38,970,861, which reflects a 2.6% decrease from the prior year. A Measure S Expenditures include a decrease of $640,771, bringing total FY24-25 Expenditures to $74,989,560. Mid -Year adjustments include: • $22,223 reduction to Police Staffing, due to lower contract rates • $237,657 reduction to Fire Staffing for Station 95, due to lower contract rates • $300,000 reduction to IT -Citywide Security Cameras maintenance due to the management decision to purchase versus lease the storage equipment, as it is more cost effective • $310,329 reduction in the transfer to the TCSD Fund, due to a higher than anticipated TCSD fund balance at the close of FY23-24 • $165,562 reduction in the transfer to the Library Fund, due to a higher than anticipated Library fund balance at the close of FY23-24 • $395,000 increase in transfers to the Capital Improvement Fund for three capital projects. Measure S - FY24-25 Appropriations $74,989,560 As illustrated in the pie chart, and in accordance with Council'; Measure S Appropriation Guidelines, a total of 58% of Measur appropriations are allocated to fund Capital Projects, 23% is allocated to fund Community Services, 13% is allocated to fund Police and Fire services and the remaining 6% is allocated to the City's various asset replacement funds. Total Measure S Ending Fund Balance is estimated to be $14,430,575. SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS: The City maintains 17 separate Special Revenue Funds. Activities in these funds are legally required to be accounted for in separate and distinct funds. Below is a summary of the major Mid - Year requests for each Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds. Gas Tax reflects an increase of $95,501 in revenue and transfers, per the estimates received from the State. These funds are transferred to the General Fund to support street and road maintenance. Road Maintenance Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) reflects an increase of $87,393 in revenue. RMRA revenue is decreasing by $39,927 per the estimates received from the State, which is offset by an increase of $127,320 in anticipated investment interest. Development Impact Fee revenue reflects an increase of $106,866. Development Impact Fee revenue is decreasing by $468,362 due to delays in development projects, however Quimby Fees reflect an increase of $144,217 and investment interest is increasing by $431,011. Community Development Block Grant reflects an increase of $2,000 in expenditures to cover increased consulting fees. AB2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention reflects an increase of $1,000 in expenditures to support WRCOG's Clean Cities Coalition program. Supplemental Law Enforcement Services reflects an increase of $1,564 in revenue and transfers, to reflect interest earnings. These funds are transferred to the General Fund to support law enforcement. Affordable Housing reflects an increase of $202,834 in revenue, mostly attributable to higher investment interest, and an $80,184 reduction in expenditures due to the reallocation of the Deputy City Manager's salaries and benefits. INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS: The City has nine Internal Service Funds, used to account for services provided internally between departments. Below is a summary of the major Mid -Year requests for the Internal Service Funds. Insurance Fund reflects an increase of $400,000 in expenditures as a result of higher litigation claim activity than anticipated in the Adopted Budget. Additionally, in order to meet the desired reserve in this fund a transfer from the General Fund of $1,172,672 is requested in order to bring the reserve to $2 million. Workers' Compensation Fund reflects a transfer from the General Fund of $436,678 to restore the desired reserve level to $1.5 million in this fund. Vehicles and Equipment Fund reflect an increase of $47,500 in Capital Outlay to fund the replacement of a vehicle in Community Development and the increased cost of an electric van. Information Technology Fund reflects a decrease of $300,000 in revenue from a Measure S contribution due to the management decision to purchase, rather than lease, the storage capacity for the Citywide security cameras. Technology Replacement Fund reflects an increase of $300,000 in Capital Outlay for the purchase of the storage for the Citywide security cameras. Support Services Fund reflects a decrease of $22,000 in Salaries and Benefits to reflect anticipate salary savings due to a vacant position. Facilities Fund reflects a decrease of $276,036 in expenditures, due primarily to a reduction in the Transfer to the Facilities Replacement Fund due to a lower than expected ending fund balance from the prior fiscal year. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRIC'IWSD) FUNDS: TCSD Operations Fund reflect a decrease of $276,286 in revenue, mostly due to the decreased Measure S transfer resulting from a higher beginning fund balance. An increase in expenditures of $173,072 is reflected due primarily to increased homeless encampment cleanup efforts. TCSD Ending Fund Balance is projected to be $100,000 for Fiscal Year 2024-25. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Adjustments to the Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program include the following: • Fiber Optic Communications Systems -Citywide — reflects an increase of $75,000 in Measure S funding, to provide traffic network switches. • Old Town Parking Improvements — reflects an increase of $55,000 in Measure S funding, to provide for the installation of parking censors in Old Town. • Comprehensive General Plan Update — reflects an increase of $340,000 in General Fund funding, for an economic development study and project manager to oversee the General Plan project. The following new projects are recommended to be added to the CIP: • Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Extension — reflects the transfer of $265,000 in Measure S funding. The new Capital Project will provide for the design and installation of fiber optic communications throughout the City's traffic signal network. SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS & SALARY SCHEDULE Two additional full-time, authorized positions are requested, bringing the total Authorized Position count to 201.2, including one unfunded position. The two new positions include an Office Specialist in the Fire Department and the Assistant Director of Community Development. In addition to the 201.2 Authorized positions, the City also employs seven Limited -Term Assignment positions and four Staffing Continuity positions, which are temporarily overfilling existing positions held by employees currently on leave. The Citywide Salary Schedule has been updated to include the salary range for the new Code Enforcement Manager position, which is being converted from a Code Enforcement Officer position. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal impact of each fund is noted in the attached Exhibits. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Summary of FY 2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests 2. Resolution — City Mid -Year Budget Amendments 3. Exhibits A, B, C and D — City Fund Summaries and Schedule of Authorized Positions 4. Resolution — CIP and Mid -Year Budget Amendments 5. Exhibit 1— CIP Mid -Year Requests 6. Resolution — Salary Schedule 7. Salary Schedule 8. Resolution TCSD - TCSD Mid -Year Budget Amendments 9. Exhibit A — TCSD Fund Summaries City of Temecula Summary of FY2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Account Description Adjusted 2024-25 Budget Mid -Year Request Revised 2024-25 Budget Comments/Justification EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS GENERALFUND City Manager 001.110.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,672,872 465,404 3,138,276 Reallocation of Deputy City Manager's salaries/benefits 465,404 Emergency Management 001.115.999.5222. Printing 150 250 400 Increased cost for outreach and CERT course materials 001.115.999.5250. Other Outside Services 52,088 500 52,588 Increased cost for Live Scans 001.115.999.5427. Radio Service 3,260 1,100 4,360 Increased cost for PSEC Radio Subscription 001.115.999.5610. Equipment 5,000 7,100 12,100 Request for wrap on two Mass Care Trailers 8,950 Finance 001.140.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,974,293 89,948 3,064,241 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance 001.140.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,974,293 26,064 3,000,357 Conversion of two temporary positions to Project positions 001.140.999.5118. Temp Help 50,000 (31,014) 18,986 Conversion of two temporary positions to Project positions 84,998 Human Resources 001.150.999.5247. Legal Services - FIR 154,560 150,000 304,560 Increased litigation expenditures 001.150.999.5248. Consulting Services 134,592 40,000 174,592 Increased administrative investigations 001.150.999.5258. Conferences 20,170 12,000 32,170 Increased cost of conferences 202,000 Planning 001.161.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,193,147 (255,974) 1,937,173 Reallocation of Deputy City Manager's salaries/benefits 001.161.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,193,147 83,821 2,276,968 New Assistant Director of Community Development position 001.161.999.5248. Consulting Services 696,441 (50,282) 646,159 Cost reductions 001.161.999.5250. Other Outside Services 151,221 (12,381) 138,840 Cost reductions (234,816) Code Enforcement 001.162.611.51** Salaries/Benefits 787,144 (46,541) 740,603 Reallocation of Deputy City Manager's salaries/benefits 001.162.611.51** Salaries/Benefits 787,144 62,624 849,768 Conversion of Code Enforcement Officer to Code Enforcement Manager 001.162.611.51** Salaries/Benefits 787,144 12,897 800,041 New Assistant Director of Community Development position 001.162.611.5250. Other Outside Services 39,921 20,079 60,000 Higher citation appeals 49,059 City of Temecula Summary of FY2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Account Description Adjusted 2024-25 Budget Mid -Year Request Revised 2024-25 Budget Comments/Justification Building & Safety 001.162.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,672,872 (69,811) 2,603,061 Reallocation of Deputy City Manager's salaries/benefits 001.162.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,672,872 19,344 2,692,216 New Assistant Director of Community Development position 001.162.999.5248. Consulting Services 361,781 38,219 400,000 Higher consulting fees (12,248) Public Works Public Works Land Dev 001.163.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 1,902,948 (8,997) 1,893,951 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance 001.163.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 1,902,948 (85,000) 1,817,948 Transfer of vacancy savings between Public Works divisions to offset new requests (93,997) Public Works Streets Maint. 001.164.601.51** Salaries/Benefits 1,878,201 (17,989) 1,860,212 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance 001.164.601.5214. Repair & Maint. - Vehicle 55,000 30,000 85,000 Higher vehicle repairs than anticipated 001.164.601.5218. Maintenance Supplies 132,000 15,000 147,000 Additional emergency supplies 001.164.601.5430. Haz-Mat Disposal 20,000 10,000 30,000 Increased cost to remove HazMat material 37,011 Public Works Traffic Engineering 001.164.602.51** Salaries/Benefits 605,791 (13,492) 592,299 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance (13,492) Public Works NPDES Compliance 001.164.605.5119. Part -Time (Project) 27,920 (6,000) 21,920 Salary savings (6,000) Public Works CIP Admin 001.165.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 2,901,927 (40,470) 2,861,457 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance (40,470) Public Works Parks Maintenance IF 001.167.999.5119. Part -Time (Project) 93,106 18,365 111,471 Addition of part-time Custodian 001.167.999.5214. Repair & Maint. - Vehicle 28,000 15,000 43,000 Higher vehicle repairs than anticipated 001.167.999.5610. Equipment 88,951 7,500 96,451 Increased cost for electric van purchase 40,865 Police 001.170.999.5288. Sworn Staff 27,022,166 (234,750) 26,787,416 Vacancy savings 001.170.999.5242. Small Tools/Equipment 100,000 (50,000) 50,000 Cost savings 001.170.999.5370. Special Events 25,000 (24,000) 1,000 Cost savings (308,750) City of Temecula Summary of FY2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Adjusted Revised 2024-25 Mid -Year 2024-25 Account Description Budget Request Budget Comments/Justification Fire/ Fire Prevention 001.171.710.51** Salaries/Benefits 454,865 32,622 487,487 New Office Specialist position 001.171.710.5251. Fire Services - Prevention 1,029,031 181,302 1,210,333 Addition of 2 Fire Systems Inspectors 001.171.710.5610. Equipment - 100,000 100,000 Vehicle for new Fire Systems Inspectors 001.171.999.5251. Fire Services - Suppression 8,408,344 (505,998) 7,902,346 Reduced contract rates from Cal FIRE (192,074) Animal Control 001.172.999.5454. Non -Departmental 001.199.999.5353. 001.199.999.7300. 001.199.999.7305. Shelter Operations Staffing Continuity Reserve Transfer Out to Insurance Fund Transfer Out to Workers' Comp TOTALGENERALIFUND 340,592 394,100 - - (118,605) (118,605) 200,000 1,172,672 436,678 1,809,350 1,677,185 221,987 Adopted Budget was estimated too high. 594,100 Funding for overfilled positions covering employees on leave 1,172,672 To increase reserve in Insurance Fund to $21VI 436,678 to increase reserve in Workers' Comp Fund to $1.51VI Measure S Fund 002.199.999.7001. Transfer Out to General Fund 10,210,530 (259,880) 9,950,650 Reduction in public safety contract costs 002.199.999.7320. Transfer Out to Info Tech Fund 600,000 (300,000) 300,000 Camera Storage Lease moving to F325 Equipment purchase. 002.199.999.7190. Transfer Out to TCSD Fund 16,175,055 (310,329) 15,864,726 Reduce due to higher than expected beginning fund balance 002.199.999.7197. Transfer Out to Library Fund (165,562) (165,562) Reduce due to higher than expected beginning fund balance (1,035,771) •(1,035,771) SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Gas Tax Fund 100.164.999.7001. Transfer Out to General Fund 3,034,274 95,501 3,129,775 Higher Gas Tax revenue projected by the State. 95,501 CDBG Fund 140.199.999.5248. Consulting Services 80,600 2,000 82,600 Higher consulting expenditures 2,000 AB 2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention Fund 150.199.999.5250. Other Outside Services 10,000 1,000 11,000 Increase to accommodate Clean Cities Coalition (WRCOG) invoice 1,000 City of Temecula Summary of FY2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Account Description Adjusted 2024-25 Budget Mid -Year Request Revised 2024-25 Budget Comments/Justification Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Fund 160.199.999.7001. Transfer Out to General Fund 280,000 1,564 281,564 Increase to reflect higher projected SLESF revenue. 1,564 Affordable Housing 165.199.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 292,020 (93,081) 198,939 Reallocation of Deputy City Manager's salaries/benefits 165.199.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 292,020 12,897 304,917 New Assistant Director of Community Development position (80,184) TOTAL• TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) TCSD Operations 190.180.999.5250. Other Outside Services 260,048 58,271 318,319 Increased security for trails and facilities. 58,271 TCSD Operations Maintenance 190.180.164.51** Salaries/Benefits 781,380 28,198 809,578 Addition of 7 part-time custodians 190.180.164.5250. Other Outside Services 284,000 (11,495) 272,505 Cost savings 16,703 TCSD Homeless Outreach RL 190.201.999.5409. Property Maintenance 324,432 176,290 500,722 Increased homeless encampment cleanup activity 176,290 TCSD Workforce Development sm- IM 190.202.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 130,433 (78,192) 52,241 Budget erroneously included salaries for interns/externs 197.180.999.5202. Library Contract Services 168,300 (29,980) 138,320 Reduce to reflect true contracted rate for FY24-25. (29,980) Library Maintenance 197.180.164.51** Salaries/Benefits 251,675 11,279 262,954 Addition of 7 part-time custodians 197.180.164.5250. Other Outside Services SERVICE LEVELS Service Level D IJ& 194.180.999.51** Salaries/Benefits 98,000 (2,299) 8,980 83,982 (4,500) (4,500) 95,701 Cost savings 79,482 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance City of Temecula Summary of FY2024-25 Mid -Year Appropriation Requests Adjusted Revised 2024-25 Mid -Year 2024-25 Account Description Budget Request Budget Comments/Justification Service Level C 504.180.999.5240. Utilities INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS 1,800 1,500 3,300 Increase in utilities cost 1.500 Insurance Fund w 300.199.999.5246. Legal Services General 500,000 400,000 900,000 Increased litigation activity 400,000 Vehicles and Equipment Fun 310.199.999.5610. Equipment 421,550 47,500 469,050 Replacement of vehicle in Community Development and increased cost of electric van 47,500 ISF Information Technology 320.199.999.5239. Equipment Lease 850,250 (300,000) 550,250 Change from lease to purchase for Security Camera storage ISF Technology Replacement Ew 325.199.999.5610. Equipment ISF Support Services 330.199.999.5100. Facilities - All City Facilities 340.199.164.51 * * Salaries & Wages Salaries/Benefits (300,000) 225,542 300,000 525,542 Change from lease to purchase for Security Camera storage 300,000 84,336 (22,000) 62,336 Vacancy savings (22,000) 558,337 16,919 575,256 Addition of 7 part-time custodians 340.199.164.51** Salaries/Benefits 558,337 (4,500) 553,837 Reallocation of personnel costs from Public Works to Finance 340.199.164.5250. Other Outside Services 360,000 (9,196) 350,804 Cost savings 340.199.164.7350. Transfer Out to F350 885,585 (279,259) 606,326 Reduced to reflect true FY23-24 ending Fund Balance. (276,036) TOTAL RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Section 2. That each year a mid -year review is conducted of City operating budgets. Section 3. That the mid -year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules for the City's General Fund, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Internal Services Funds. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2024-25 General Fund and Measure S Fund Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit A, General Fund Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid -Year Budget. Section 5. That the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Special Revenue Funds Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit B — Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid -Year Budget. Section 6. That the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Internal Services Funds Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit C, Internal Services Funds Fiscal Year 2024-25 Mid -Year Budget. Section 7. That the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Schedule of Authorized Positions is hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit D, Schedule of Authorized Positions. Section 8. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 1 Ph day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11 th day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A General Fund & Measure S Fund Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Property Tax Sales Tax Sales Tax Sharing Agreement Franchise Fees Transient Occupancy Tax Special Tax (Measure C) Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services Business Licenses Land Development Parks Maintenance Building Planning Police Fire Development Fees Fines and Forfeitures Fines & Forfeitures Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Lease/Rental Income Other Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In Lieu Of VLF Vehicle License Fees Grants Reimbursements Capital Improvement Program Pechanga IGA Other Reimbursements Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits Operations & Maintenance Internal Service Fund Allocations Capital Outlay Transfers 11,231,801 11,111,250 3,777,631 11,610,309 499,059 4.5 % 46,566,619 47,685,715 15,050,162 46,185,715 (1,500,000) -3.1 % (1,556,194) (1,449,776) (380,152) (1,640,791) (191,015) 13.2 % 4,343,507 4,440,970 1,344,591 4,566,382 125,412 2.8 % 4,998,676 4,704,116 1,916,923 4,428,313 (275,803) -5.9 % 1,908,085 1,926,088 25,985 1,926,088 0 0.0 % 324 0 1,035 950 950 100.0 % 283,406 280,908 145,390 280,908 0 0.0 % 1,644,058 1,359,414 494,998 989,460 (369,954) -27.2 % 20,252 1,399 0 1,399 0 0.0 % 2,959,875 3,065,425 1,130,889 2,789,600 (275,825) -9.0 % 571,434 618,968 207,226 535,954 (83,014) -13.4 % 89,701 168,843 53,205 87,140 (81,703) -48.4 % 1,337,931 1,141,421 486,939 1,824,057 682,636 59.8 % 68,659 173,356 34,076 69,065 (104,291) -60.2 % 579,995 411,457 173,086 411,457 0 0.0 % 2,549,544 87,644 1,006,610 1,324,449 1,236,805 1,411.2 % 264,422 226,700 130,755 226,700 0 0.0 % 171,359 252,675 44,404 179,000 (73,675) -29.2 % 10, 532,198 10, 918,450 135,651 124,848 140,557 40,271 3,172,243 3,351,658 404,061 422,244 1,118,731 1,202,157 10,392,823 8,314,274 5,230,205 10,210,530 0 11,078,042 0 124,848 150,715 164,253 159,592 0 123,982 1,032,936 3,351,658 0 0 422,244 0 258,912 1,223,900 21,743 7,021,337 8,411,339 97,065 5,105,265 9,950,650 (259,880) 1.5 % 0.0 % 307.9 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 1.8 % 1.2 % -2.5 % 29,802 2,142 26,493 50,217 48,075 2,244.4 % 109,189,725 110,793,147 39,239,411 110,573,306 (219,841) -0.2 % 22,526,624 21,988,761 12,302,061 22,224,562 235,801 1.1 % 64,676,600 68,429,310 22,703,878 68,146,744 (282,566) -0.4 % 9,232,052 9,518,305 6,946,484 9,518,305 0 0.0 % 316,468 240,506 38,355 355,106 114,600 47.6 % 17,831,046 10,679,935 750,000 12,629,285 1,949,350 18.3 % Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 114,582,789 110,856,817 42,740,779 112,874,002 2,017,185 1.8 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (5,393,065) (63,670) (3,501,367) (2,300,695) (2,237,025) 3,513.5 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 46,302,379 40,909,314 40,909,314 Fund Balance, End of Year 40,909,314 40,845,644 38,608,619 Fund Description The General Fund is the main operating fund for the City of Temecula. It is used to account for all financial resources for the City that are not restricted to a special purpose and otherwise required to be accounted for in another fund. The General fund provides the resources necessary to sustain the day-to-day activities and pays for all administrative and operating expenditures. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 002 - MEASURE S FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Transactions And Use Tax 37,673,402 38,865,950 12,321,952 37,365,950 (1,500,000) -3.9 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 2,325,092 500,000 1,268,548 1,604,911 1,104,911 221.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 39,998,494 39,365,950 13,590,500 38,970,861 (395,089) -1.0 Expenditures by Category Transfers 35,541,559 75,630,331 16,239,355 74,989,560 (640,771) -0.8 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 35,541,559 75,630,331 16,239,355 74,989,560 (640,771) -0.8 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 4,456,935 (36,264,381) (2,648,855) (36,018,699) 245,682 -0.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 45,992,339 50,449,274 50,449,274 Fund Balance, End of Year 50,449,274 14,184,893 14,430,575 Fund Description Measure 5, approved by the voters on November 8, 2016, established a one -cent Transactions and Use Tax for the City. The measure was approved based on the commitment to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response times, prevent cuts to local paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior and disabled services; improve freeway interchanges/reduce traffic and provide for other general services. EXHIBIT B Special Revenue Funds and Debt Service Funds Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 006 - FIRE FACILITY ACQUISITION FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 172,262 25,000 121,320 156,221 131,221 524.9 Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 1,500,000 1,500,000 750,000 1,500,000 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 1,672,262 1,525,000 871,320 1,656,221 131,221 8.6 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,672,262 1,525,000 871,320 1,656,221 131,221 8.6 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,029,523 4,701,785 4,701,785 Fund Balance, End of Year 4,701,785 6,226,785 6,358,006 Fund Description This fund was established to accumulate resources necessary to acquire property for a future Fire Station, construct new Fire Station or refurbish existing Fire Stations. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FUND: 100 -GAS TAX FUND City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Gas Tax 3,032,152 3,028,274 1,122,216 3,101,221 72,947 2.4 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 43,033 6,000 21,929 28,554 22,554 375.9 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 3,075,185 3,034,274 1,144,145 3,129,775 95,501 3.1 % Expenditures by Category Transfers 3,075,185 3,034,274 0 3,129,775 95,501 3.1 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 3,075,185 3,034,274 0 3,129,775 95,501 3.1 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 0 0 1,144,145 0 0 -100.0 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 0 0 Fund Balance, End of Year 0 0 0 Fund Description This fund was established to account for the tax per gallon on the purchase of motor vehicle fuel imposed by the State of California. A portion is allocated to the City of Temecula as specified in the California Streets and Highways Code (SHC) (Sections 2013, 2105, 2107 and 2107.5). Gas Tax monies are restricted to the repair, maintenance and upkeep of City streets and roads, and the purchase of equipment used to maintain roads. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 102 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Gas Tax 2,778,429 2,810,553 1,265,593 2,770,626 (39,927) -1.4 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 112,667 10,000 106,969 137,320 127,320 1,273.2 Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,891,096 2,820,553 1,372,562 2,907,946 87,393 3.1 Expenditures by Category Transfers 120,859 6,098,426 0 6,098,426 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 120,859 6,098,426 0 6,098,426 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,770,237 (3,277,873) 1,372,562 (3,190,480) 87,393 -2.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,038,689 3,808,926 3,808,926 Fund Balance, End of Year 3,808,926 531,053 618,446 Fund Description This fund is to account for gasoline and vehicle registration taxes pursuant to the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (S61 Beall). Monies are collected by the State of California and allocated to local agencies for streets and roads projects and other transportation uses. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 103 - STREET MAINTENANCE FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 224,652 39,700 158,977 234,728 195,028 491.3 Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,224,652 2,039,700 1,158,977 2,234,728 195,028 9.6 Expenditures by Category Transfers 0 2,937,307 0 2,937,307 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 0 2,937,307 0 2,937,307 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,224,652 (897,607) 1,158,977 (702,579) 195,028 -21.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,941,537 6,166,190 6,166,190 Fund Balance, End of Year 6,166,190 5,268,583 5,463,611 Fund Description This fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of streets and roads throughout the City Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 105 - NPDES IN LIEU FEES FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 28,738 5,000 15,318 20,162 15,162 303.2 Total Revenues and Other Sources 28,738 5,000 15,318 20,162 15,162 303.2 Expenditures by Category Capital Outlay 0 500,000 243,466 500,000 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 0 500,000 243,466 500,000 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 28,738 (495,000) (228,148) (479,838) 15,162 -3.1 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 603,016 631,753 631,753 Fund Balance, End of Year 631,753 136,753 151,915 Fund Description This fund was established to account for the collection of In Lieu fees associated with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 106 - UPTOWN TEMECULA NEW STREETS IN -LIEU FEES Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Development Impact Fees 424,218 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 61,139 8,500 35,221 45,142 36,642 431.1 Total Revenues and Other Sources 485,358 8,500 35,221 45,142 36,642 431.1 Expenditures by Category Transfers 0 500,857 0 500,857 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 0 500,857 0 500,857 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 485,358 (492,357) 35,221 (455,715) 36,642 -7.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 905,760 1,391,118 1,391,118 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,391,118 898,761 935,402 Fund Description This fund was established in conjunction with the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee. The Specific Plan requires developers to dedicate right-of-way and construct new street improvements adjacent to or through their development sites. Developers within the Specific Plan who cannot contribute right-of-way and/or build new streets will be charge( a new streets in -lieu fee. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 110 - COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PROGRAM % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 0 35,000 241,296 306,583 271,583 776.0 % Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 37,706 0 0 0 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 37,706 35,000 241,296 306,583 271,583 776.0 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 137,587 342,413 93,860 342,413 0 0.0 Operations & Maintenance 1,499,325 1,857,371 38,775 1,857,371 0 0.0 % Transfers 78,652 6,346,348 0 6,346,348 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 1,715,564 8,546,131 132,635 8,546,131 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,677,858) (8,511,131) 108,662 (8,239,548) 271,583 -3.2 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 11,145,950 9,468,092 9,468,092 Fund Balance, End of Year 9,468,092 956,961 1,228,544 Fund Description This fund was established in Fiscal Year 2021-22 to provide various community grants to support the local economy in its recovery from the COVID-19 global pandemic. Available General Fund balance was transferred into this fund to establish this new program. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 120 - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Development Impact Fees 3,910,393 3,760,240 832,358 3,291,878 (468,362) -12.5 % Quimby Fees 478,177 1,055,783 1,073,330 1,200,000 144,217 13.7 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 612,104 95,000 399,027 526,011 431,011 453.7 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 5,000,674 4,911,023 2,304,715 5,017,889 106,866 2.2 % Expenditures by Category Transfers 495,860 17,781,990 0 17,781,990 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 495,860 17,781,990 0 17,781,990 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 4,504,814 (12,870,967) 2,304,715 (12,764,101) 106,866 -0.8 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 11,359,340 15,864,154 15,864,154 Fund Balance, End of Year 15,864,154 2,993,187 3,100,053 Fund Description This fund accounts for the development impact fees received as a result of development activity within the City. The fees are primarily used to fund Capital Improvement Projects designed to mitigate the impacts of development projects. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 125 - PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT (PEG) FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises PEG Fees 147,940 179,000 32,968 179,000 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 44,100 6,500 26,173 33,523 27,023 415.7 Total Revenues and Other Sources 192,040 185,500 59,140 212,523 27,023 14.6 Expenditures by Category Capital Outlay 37,686 175,000 0 175,000 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 37,686 175,000 0 175,000 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 154,355 10,500 59,140 37,523 27,023 257.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 879,324 1,033,678 1,033,678 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,033,678 1,044,178 1,071,201 Fund Description This fund was established to account for Public Education and Government (PEG) fees. Fees received from local cable operators for the sole purpose of supporting the access facilities and activities within the City. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 140 - COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Intergovernmental Revenues Community Development Block Grant 1,495,462 539,302 56,211 539,302 0 0.0 CDBG - CV2 GRANTS 663,670 0 0 0 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,159,133 539,302 56,211 539,302 0 0.0 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 42,281 44,562 23,199 44,562 0 0.0 Operations & Maintenance 183,182 211,891 52,478 213,891 2,000 0.9 Transfers 2,377,403 325,000 (285,531) 325,000 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,602,866 581,453 (209,853) 583,453 2,000 0.3 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (443,733) (42,151) 266,065 (44,151) (2,000) 4.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 46,842 (396,892) (396,892) Fund Balance, End of Year (396,892) (439,042) (441,042) Fund Description This fund was established to account for grants received from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The grants are used for the redevelopment of a viable community by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and for expanding opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 145 - TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET (TEAM) FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 32,379 5,000 16,099 20,552 15,552 311.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 32,379 5,000 16,099 20,552 15,552 311.0 Expenditures by Category Transfers 132,270 550,852 0 550,852 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 132,270 550,852 0 550,852 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (99,891) (545,852) 16,099 (530,300) 15,552 -2.8 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 734,293 634,403 634,403 Fund Balance, End of Year 634,403 88,551 104,103 Fund Description This fund was established to capture energy efficiency rebates and reimbursements as well as expenditure savings resulting from energy efficiency projects completed at various City facilities. Revenue collected in this fund will be utilized on future energy efficiency projects. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 150 - AB 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE SUBVENTION FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 19,018 3,000 11,772 15,073 12,073 402.4 % Intergovernmental Revenues AB2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention 109,845 150,000 73,598 150,000 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 128,863 153,000 85,370 165,073 12,073 7.9 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 11,000 10,000 0 11,000 1,000 10.0 Transfers 69,175 609,075 0 609,075 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 80,175 619,075 0 620,075 1,000 0.2 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 48,688 (466,075) 85,370 (455,002) 11,073 -2.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 391,055 439,743 439,743 Fund Balance, End of Year 439,743 (26,332) (15,259) Fund Description This fund was established to account for subvention funds that are used to implement programs and projects that reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. AB2766 Funds are derived from a Motor Vehicle Registration fee surcharge. Local governments are allocated $1.60 for every eligible vehicle registered within the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Funds are disbursed based on the City's population as a percentage of the total population within the District. This fund is used for Capital projects and the City's share of WRCOG's Clean Cities Coalition. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 160 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 2,043 0 1,571 1,564 1,564 100.0 Intergovernmental Revenues SLESF Grant 315,596 280,000 185,282 280,000 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 317,639 280,000 186,852 281,564 1,564 0.6 Expenditures by Category Transfers 317,639 280,000 0 281,564 1,564 0.6 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 317,639 280,000 0 281,564 1,564 0.6 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 0 0 186,852 0 0 100.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 0 0 Fund Balance, End of Year 0 0 0 Fund Description This fund was established to account for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services grant monies from the State of California which are provided to assist cities in delivering front line law enforcement services. These monies supplement existing services and may not be used to supplant any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by the City. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 165 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Redevelopment Property Tax Fund 0 620,091 0 620,091 0 0.0 Distribution Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 282,768 50,000 172,682 224,234 174,234 348.5 Lease/Rental Income 75,600 45,000 25,200 70,000 25,000 55.6 % Other 91,633 0 0 0 0 0.0 Intergovernmental Revenues Agency Trust Contribution 250,000 250,000 0 250,000 0 0.0 Reimbursements Other Reimbursements 0 0 3,679 3,600 3,600 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 700,001 965,091 201,561 1,167,925 202,834 21.0 Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 365,308 293,633 155,021 213,449 (80,184) -27.3 Operations & Maintenance 99,354 288,423 141,185 288,423 0 0.0 Internal Service Fund Allocations 68,102 50,054 39,934 50,054 0 0.0 % Transfers 0 5,091,359 0 5,091,359 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 532,763 5,723,469 336,140 5,643,285 (80,184) -1.4 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 167,238 (4,758,378) (134,579) (4,475,360) 283,018 -5.9 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 12,004,378 12,171,616 12,171,616 Fund Balance, End of Year 12,171,616 7,413,238 7,696,256 Fund Description The Affordable Housing fund contains the assets as well as loan and rental income which have been transferred to the City of Temecula from the former Redevelopment Agency. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 170 - MEASURE A FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 381,124 55,000 216,539 274,687 219,687 399.4 % Intergovernmental Revenues Measure A 4,699,697 4,354,000 1,318,038 4,293,000 (61,000) -1.4 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 5,080,822 4,409,000 1,534,577 4,567,687 158,687 3.6 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 2,885,916 3,283,743 9 3,283,743 0 0.0 Transfers 923,190 6,990,869 0 6,990,869 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 3,809,106 10,274,612 9 10,274,612 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,271,715 (5,865,612) 1,534,568 (5,706,925) 158,687 -2.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 7,096,089 8,367,804 8,367,804 Fund Balance, End of Year 8,367,804 2,502,192 2,660,879 Fund Description This fund was established to account for the City's allocation of the County of Riverside's additional one-half percent sales tax for transportation. These monies are restricted for use on local streets. In 2002, Measure A was extended by Riverside County voters. Measure A will continue to fund transportation improvements through 2039. EXHIBIT C Internal Service Funds Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 300 - INSURANCE FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 3,827,116 3,115,169 2,426,746 3,115,169 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 36,981 3,000 33,887 37,615 34,615 1,153.8 % Reimbursements Other Reimbursements 396,641 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 0 0 0 1,172,672 1,172,672 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 4,260,738 3,118,169 2,460,633 4,325,456 1,207,287 38.7 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 221,774 207,956 149,716 207,956 0 0.0 % Operations & Maintenance 3,605,342 2,907,213 2,277,030 3,307,213 400,000 13.8 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 3,827,116 3,115,169 2,426,746 3,515,169 400,000 12.8 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 433,622 3,000 33,887 810,287 807,287 26,909.7 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 756,091 1,189,713 1,189,713 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,189,713 1,192,713 2,000,000 Fund Description The Insurance Fund was established to account for the City's liability and property insurance costs. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. These costs are allocated to each department based on the total number of Full Time Equivalent positions assigned to those departments. The City has a Self -Insured Retention (SIR) of $500,000 per incident, and strives to maintain a fund balance equal to three times the SIR. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 305 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 0 556,470 0 556,470 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 58,495 10,000 23,371 29,262 19,262 192.6 % Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 0 0 0 436,678 436,678 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 58,495 566,470 23,371 1,022,410 455,940 80.5 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 221,773 193,674 147,947 193,674 0 0.0 % Operations & Maintenance 289,371 376,062 252,505 376,062 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 511,143 569,735 400,452 569,735 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (452,649) (3,265) (377,081) 452,674 455,940 -13,962.6 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,499,975 1,047,326 1,047,326 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,047,326 1,044,060 1,500,000 Fund Description The Workers' Compensation Fund was established in Fiscal Year 2014-15 as the City transitions to a self -insured status for Workers' Compensation liabilities. Departments are charged based on each position allocated on a Full Time Equivalent basis, with a cost assigned to each position based on job duties and potential for risk. The desired Net Position for this fund is $1.5 million, which represents three -times the City's Self -Insured Retention amount of $500,000. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 310 - VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 432,332 505,284 233,956 505,284 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 154,954 25,000 86,472 111,043 86,043 344.2 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 587,286 530,284 320,428 616,327 86,043 16.2 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 429,526 0 0 0 0 0.0 Capital Outlay 1,408 421,550 145,015 469,050 47,500 11.3 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 430,934 421,550 145,015 469,050 47,500 11.3 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 156,352 108,734 175,413 147,277 38,543 35.4 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 5,249,290 5,405,642 5,405,642 Fund Balance, End of Year 5,405,642 5,514,376 5,552,918 Fund Description The Vehicles and Equipment Fund was established to account for the depreciation of vehicles and capital equipment over their estimated useful lives, and to accumulate resources for the purchase of future replacement vehicles and equipment. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. Departments are charged based on the replacement costs for each asset benefitting the department. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FUND: 320 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S 5,847,141 6,586,001 4,465,667 6,586,001 0 0.0 44,606 8,000 18,080 22,583 14,583 300,000 600,000 150,000 300,000 (300,000) 182.3 % -50.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 6,191,747 7,194,001 4,633,747 6,908,584 (285,417) -4.0 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 2,882,293 3,139,962 1,554,820 3,139,962 0 0.0 % Operations & Maintenance 3,184,590 4,083,644 1,330,312 3,783,644 (300,000) -7.3 % Internal Service Fund Allocations 2,660 2,660 0 2,660 0 0.0 % Capital Outlay (475,258) 24,000 0 24,000 0 0.0 % Transfers 0 1,748,615 1,748,615 1,748,615 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 5,594,285 8,998,880 4,633,747 8,698,880 (300,000) -3.3 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 597,462 (1,804,879) 0 (1,790,297) 14,583 -0.8 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,792,752 2,390,214 2,390,214 Fund Balance, End of Year 2,390,214 585,335 599,917 Fund Description The Information Technology Fund was established to fund and account for computer and telephone system operating and maintenance expenses. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. Adjustments are made to Fund Balance to include additional spendable resources available for expenditure. Departments are charged based on the number of electronic devices assigned. The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library facility is charged directly for all IT expenditures and personnel costs related to the facility. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 325 - TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 164,530 255,842 102,626 255,842 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 128,336 0 77,704 96,454 96,454 100.0 % Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 0 1,748,615 1,748,615 1,748,615 0 0.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 292,866 2,004,457 1,928,945 2,100,911 96,454 4.8 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 151,157 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Capital Outlay 0 225,542 35,542 525,542 300,000 133.0 % Transfers 62,028 701,506 0 701,506 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 213,186 927,048 35,542 1,227,048 300,000 32.4 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 79,680 1,077,409 1,893,403 873,864 (203,546) -18.9 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,026,610 3,106,290 3,106,290 Fund Balance, End of Year 3,106,290 4,183,699 3,980,154 Fund Description The Technology Replacement Fund was established in Fiscal Year 2014-15 in order to accumulate resources for computer and telephone equipment and software to fund future equipment replacement. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. Contributions to this fund are made by departments utilizing the assets in an amount equivalent to the estimated cost to replace the item at the end of its useful life. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 330 - SUPPORT SERVICES FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 341,356 429,895 189,665 429,895 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 788 0 203 255 255 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 342,144 429,895 189,868 430,150 255 0.1 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 248,422 295,894 148,411 273,894 (22,000) -7.4 % Operations & Maintenance 107,387 134,000 41,457 134,000 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 355,810 429,894 189,868 407,894 (22,000) -5.1 % 4,046, 378.2 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (13,666) 1 0 22,256 22,255 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 13,811 145 145 Fund Balance, End of Year 145 145 22,400 Fund Description The Support Services Fund was established as a cost center for the City's central receptionist, duplicating, printing, and mailing activities. It is also used to depreciate all related copying and mailing equipment over their useful lives, and to accumulate resources for the purchase of future equipment. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. Departments are charged based on a count of copies made in the previous fiscal year. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 335 - SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 33,101 28,165 11,761 28,165 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 16,389 2,500 9,261 11,923 9,423 376.9 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 49,490 30,665 21,022 40,088 9,423 30.7 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 42,394 0 0 0 0 0.0 Capital Outlay 0 30,000 13,581 30,000 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 42,394 30,000 13,581 30,000 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 7,097 665 7,442 10,088 9,423 1,417.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 378,901 385,998 385,998 Fund Balance, End of Year 385,998 386,663 396,085 Fund Description The Support Services Replacement Fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of the City's duplicating equipment. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 340 - FACILITIES FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services 1,648,283 1,703,247 1,657,171 1,703,247 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 20,632 4,000 9,636 12,533 8,533 213.3 % Reimbursements Other Reimbursements 24,000 0 24,000 24,000 24,000 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 1,692,915 1,707,247 1,690,807 1,739,780 32,533 1.9 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 551,526 596,247 331,529 608,666 12,419 2.1 % Operations & Maintenance 1,117,389 1,108,948 449,693 1,099,752 (9,196) -0.8 % Transfers 0 885,585 885,585 606,326 (279,259) -31.5 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 1,668,915 2,590,779 1,666,807 2,314,743 (276,036) -10.7 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 24,000 (883,532) 24,000 (574,963) 308,569 -34.9 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 582,326 606,326 606,326 Fund Balance, End of Year 606,326 (277,206) 31,363 Fund Description The Facilities Fund was established to account for the cost of the Civic Center, Former City Hall Facility, City Maintenance Facility, Field Operations Center, and Civic Center Parking Structure operations and maintenance. Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets. Departments are charged based on square footage allotted as well as full time staff equivalents assigned. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FUND: 350 - FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Charges For Services Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S Total Revenues and Other Sources 92,005 118,313 58,510 118,313 0 0.0 % 45,259 2,500 68,378 88,524 86,024 3,441.0 % 0 885,585 885,585 606,326 (279,259) -31.5 % 2,550,000 2,500,000 1,250,000 2,500,000 0 0.0 % 2,687,264 3,506,398 2,262,473 3,313,164 (193,234) -5.5 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 87,338 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Capital Outlay 3,074 41,138 41,138 41,138 0 0.0 % Transfers 604,731 1,922,395 0 1,922,395 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 695,143 1,963,533 41,138 1,963,533 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,992,122 1,542,865 2,221,335 1,349,631 (193,234) -12.5 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 652,133 2,644,255 2,644,255 Fund Balance, End of Year 2,644,255 4,187,120 3,993,886 Fund Description The Facility Replacement Fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of equipment, systems and fixtures within City -owned facilities. EXHIBIT D Schedule of Authorized Positions ., Hepq of 5oomem Caktio,ma City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 CITY COUNCIL Councilmember FY2024-25 Number of Positions 5.0 Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 600 2,100 Unit*** N/A Exempt E City Council Subtotal: 5.0 CITY MANAGER Assistant City Manager 1.0 18,708 26,435 Exec E Assistant to the City Manager 1.0 11,497 16,247 MCP E City Manager 1.0 N/A 29,078 Contract E Deputy City Manager Executive Assistant 1.0 1.0 17,009 24,033 Exec E 6,051 8,549 MCP E Senior Office Specialist 1.0 1 4,845 6,202 Rep NE City Manager Subtotal: OFFICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,217 6,679 Rep NE Economic Development Manager 1.0 10,416 14,718 MCP E Management Analyst 1.0 6,845 9,672 MCP E Multimedia Specialist 1/11 1.0 5,904 7,939 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst 1.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E Office of Public Information & Economic Development Subtotal: CITY CLERK Deputy City Clerk 1.0 7,745 10,943 MCP E Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk 1.0 15,085 21,315 Exec E Management Assistant 1.0 5,618 7,192 Rep NE Records Manager 1.0 7,017 9,915 MCP E Records Technician 1.0 4,075 5,217 Rep NE City Clerk Subtotal: 5.0 HUMAN RESOURCES Director of HR/Risk Management 1.0 15,085 21,315 Exec E Human Resources Technician 1/II (Confidential) 1.0 5,349 7,939 MCP NE Management Assistant (Confidential) 2.0 5,618 7,939 MCP NE Senior Management Analyst 2.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E Senior Management Analyst (underfill as Management Analyst) 1.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E Human Resources Subtotal: 7.0 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Senior Management Analyst 1 1.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E Emergency Management Subtotal: 1 1.0 ., Hepq of 5oomem Caktio,ma City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 w FINANCE Accountant 1/11 Accounting Assistant (Cashier & AP) FY2024-25 Number of Positions 2.0 Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 7,017 9,436 Unit*** Rep Exempt NE 3.0 4,964 6,356 Rep NE Accounting Technician 1/11 1.0 5,481 7,372 Rep NE Assistant Director of Finance 1.0 12,691 17,931 MCP E Director of Finance 1.0 15,463 21,849 Exec E Finance Manager 1.0 8,982 12,691 MCP E Fiscal Services Manager 2.0 10,416 14,718 MCP E Management Analyst 2.0 6,845 9,672 MCP E Senior Accountant (Confidential) 1.0 8,138 11,497 MCP NE Senior Accounting Technician 1.0 6,356 8,138 Rep NE Senior Accounting Technician - Payroll (Confidential) 1.0 1 6,356 8,982 MCP NE Finance Subtotal: 16 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Assistant Director Information Technology/Support Svcs 1.0 12,381 17,495 MCP E Director of Information Technology/Support Svcs 1.0 15,085 21,315 Exec E Information Technology Manager 1.0 11,216 15,848 MCP E Information Technology Specialist 1/11 (Confidential) 2.0 6,051 8,982 MCP NE Information Technology Supervisor (Confidential) 4.0 7,745 10,943 MCP NE Information Technology Supervisor (Multimedia Services) (Confidential) 1.0 7,745 10,943 MCP NE Information Technology Technician 1/11 0.5 5,217 7,745 MCP NE Management Analyst 1.0 6,845 9,672 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,760 7,372 Rep NE Senior Information Technology Specialist (Confidential) 2.0 7,017 9,915 MCP NE Support Services Information Technology Technician 1/11 0.5 5,217 7,745 MCP NE Office Specialist 1/11- AM 0.6 4,177 5,618 Rep NE Office Specialist 1/11- PM 0.6 4,177 5,618 Rep NE Support Services Supervisor 1 1.0 1 4,845 6,202 1 Rep NE Information Technology Subtotal: 2 ., Hepq of 5oomem Caktio,ma City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Assistant Director of Community Development FY2024-25 Number of Positions 1.0 Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 12,691 17,931 Unit*** MCP Exempt E Director of Community Development 1.0 15,463 21,849 Exec E Principal Management Analyst 1.0 8,764 12,381 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,760 7,372 Rep NE Planning Assistant Planner 1.0 6,356 8,138 Rep NE Associate Planner I (underfill as Planning Technician) 1.0 7,372 9,436 Rep NE Associate Planner 1/11 2.0 7,372 10,416 Rep NE Community Development Technician 1 1.0 5,618 7,192 Rep NE Community Development Technician 11 (underfill as Comm Dev Tech 1) 2.0 6,202 7,939 Rep NE Planning Manager 1.0 10,943 15,463 MCP E Planning Technician 1.0 5,760 7,372 Rep NE Senior Community Development Technician 2.0 6,845 8,764 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst 1.1 7,939 11,216 MCP E Senior Office Specialist 1.0 4,845 6,202 Rep NE Senior Planner 1.0 8,982 12,691 MCP E Building and Safety/Code Enforcement Administrative Assistant 2.0 5,217 6,679 Rep NE Building Inspector 1 1.0 6,516 8,341 Rep NE Building Inspector 11 2.0 7,192 9,206 Rep NE Building Official 1.0 11,497 16,247 MCP E Code Enforcement Manager 1.0 8,138 11,497 MCP E Code Enforcement Officer 1 1.0 5,481 7,017 Rep NE Code Enforcement Officer 11 1.0 6,051 7,745 Rep NE Field Supervisor - Code Enforcement 1.0 7,372 9,436 Rep NE Plan Checker 1.0 8,764 11,216 Rep NE Senior Building Inspector 2.0 7,939 10,163 Rep NE Senior Code Enforcement Officer 1.0 6,679 8,549 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst 1 0.9 1 7,939 11,216 1 MCP E IV Community Development Subtotal: ILn 33.0 ., Hepq of 5oomem Caktio,ma City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 PUBLIC WORKS Assistant Director of Public Works FY2024-25 Number of Positions 1.0 Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 13,667 19,311 Unit*** MCP Exempt E Director of Public Works 1.0 15,463 21,849 Exec E Program Manager 1.0 8,764 12,381 MCP E Senior Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,760 7,372 Rep NE CIP Administration Assistant Engineer 1/11 2.0 7,017 9,436 Rep NE Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,436 12,080 Rep E Associate Civil Engineer (underfill as Assistant Engineer 11) 1.0 9,436 12,080 Rep E Associate Engineer 11 3.0 8,982 11,497 Rep E Principal Civil Engineer 2.0 11,785 16,650 MCP E Senior Civil Engineer 1.0 10,677 15,085 MCP E Senior Public Works Inspector 2.0 7,745 9,915 Rep NE Senior Public Works Inspector (underfill as Public Works Inspector 11) 1.0 7,745 9,915 Rep NE Supervising Public Works Inspector 1.0 8,549 10,943 Rep NE Land Development/NPDES Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,436 12,080 Rep E Associate Civil Engineer (underfill as Assistant Engineer 11) 1.0 9,436 12,080 Rep E Associate Engineer 11 1.0 8,982 11,497 Rep E Engineering Tech 1/11 1.0 6,051 8,138 Rep NE Management Assistant (underfill as Senior Office Specialist) 1.0 5,618 7,192 Rep NE Senior Management Analyst (underfill as Management Analyst) 1.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E Senior Public Works Inspector 1.0 7,745 9,915 Rep NE Traffic Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 9,436 12,080 Rep E Senior Civil Engineer 1.0 10,677 15,085 MCP E Senior Signal Technician 2.0 7,745 9,915 Rep NE Maintenance (Streets, Facilities, Parks) Custodian 11- Facilities 2.0 3,784 4,845 Rep NE Landscape Inspector 11 1.0 6,356 8,138 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Electrician 1.0 6,845 8,764 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - HVAC 1.0 6,845 8,764 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets 2.0 5,481 7,017 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets (underfill as Maintenance Worker 1) 1.0 5,481 7,017 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker - Parks 2.0 5,481 7,017 Rep NE Lead Maintenance Worker- Facilities 1.0 6,516 8,341 Rep NE Maintenance Manager 1.0 11,497 16,247 MCP E Maintenance Superintendent 3.0 10,416 14,718 MCP E Maintenance Worker I - Facilities 1.0 5,349 6,845 Rep NE Maintenance Worker I - Parks 1.0 4,498 5,760 Rep NE Maintenance Worker I - Streets 5.0 4,498 5,760 Rep NE Maintenance Worker 11- Facilities 3.0 5,904 7,556 Rep NE Maintenance Worker II - Parks 1.0 4,964 6,356 Rep NE Maintenance Worker II - Streets (underfill as Maintenance Worker 1) 2.0 4,964 6,356 Rep NE Management Assistant 1.0 5,618 7,192 Rep NE ., Hepq of 5oomem Caktio,ma City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 Park Attendant 1 Park Attendant 11 (underfill as Park Attendant 1) FY2024-25 Number of Positions 1.0 Monthly Salary Minimum Maximum 5,481 7,017 Unit*** Rep Exempt NE -j 1.0 6,051 7,745 Rep NE Park Attendant 11 Senior Landscape Inspector 1.0 6,051 7,745 Rep NE 1.0 7,017 8,982 Rep NE Senior Office Specialist 1.0 4,845 6,202 Rep NE Public Works Subtotal: FIRE Community Development Technician II 1.0 6,202 7,939 Rep NE Fire Inspector 11 1.0 8,341 10,677 Rep NE Management Analyst 1.0 6,845 9,672 MCP E Office Specialist 1/II 1.0 4,177 5,618 Rep NE Senior Community Development Technician (underfill as ComDevTech 1) 1.0 6,845 8,764 Rep NE Fire Subtotal: o COMMUNITY SERVICES Assistant Director of Community Services 1.0 12,381 17,495 MCP E Community Services Coordinator 1/11 5.0 5,618 7,556 Rep NE Community Services Manager 9.0 10,163 14,357 MCP E Community Services Specialist 11 1.0 5,091 6,516 Rep NE Community Services Superintendent 1.0 11,216 15,848 MCP E Community Services Supervisor 1/11 12.0 6,516 8,764 Rep NE Director of Community Services 1.0 15,085 21,315 Exec E Management Assistant 1.0 5,618 7,192 Rep NE Multimedia Coordinator 2.0 6,845 8,764 Rep NE Office Specialist 1/11 1.0 4,177 5,618 Rep NE Principal Management Analyst 1.0 8,764 12,381 MCP E Theater Technical Coordinator 1/11 1.0 5,618 7,556 Rep NE Theater Technical Coordinator 1/II (underfill as Theater Technical Specialist 11) 1 1.0 1 5,618 7,556 Re NE Community Services Subtotal: I 37.0 Total By Department Positions "Bargaining Units: Rep = Represented MCP = ManagemenUConfidential City Council 5.0 City Manager 6.0 Exec = Executive Economic Development 5.0 City Clerk 5.0 Human Resources 7.0 Emergency Management 1.0 Finance 16.0 Information Technology 17.2 Community Development 33.0 Public Works 63.0 Fire 5.0 Community Services 37.0 Total of Authorized/Unfunded Positions:) 1.0 R City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Annual Operating Budget SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS As of February 11, 2025 Authorized/Unfunded positions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING Principal Planner 1.0 9,915 14,007 MCP E Limited Term Assignment Positions: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Technician 1.0 5,760 7,372 Rep NE COMMUNITY SERVICES Management Assistant FINANCE Senior Accounting Technician (Confidential) HUMAN RESOURCES Administrative Assistant (Confidential) Human Resources Technician 1/11 Senior Management Analyst INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Office Specialist 1/11 - PM 1.0 1 5,618 8,764 1 Rep I NE 1.0 1 6,356 8,982 1 MCP NE 1.0 5,217 7,372 MCP NE 1.0 5,349 7,939 MCP NE 1.0 7,939 11,216 MCP E 1.0 1 4,177 5,618 1 Rep I NE Continuity Staffing: CITY MANAGER Administrative Assistant 1.0 5,217 6,679 Rep NE Management Analyst 1.0 6,845 9,672 MCP NE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Code Enforcement Officer 11 COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services Manager 1.0 1 6,679 8,549 1 Rep I NE 1.0 1 10,163 14,357 1 MCP E RESOLUTION NO. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2025-29 AND AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. On May 15, 2024, the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program projects are consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65401 of State Planning and Zoning Law. B. On May 28, 2024, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2024-32 approving the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2025-29 (CIP). C. Adoption of the Amendments noted herein are categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Sections 15262 and 15061 (b) (3) of the State Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program set forth in the Amendment cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Amendment are undertaken. The Council reaffirms and incorporates herein the findings set forth in Section 1 of Resolution No. 2024-32. Section 2. Specific Actions: Based on the findings above, the City Council determines and declares the following adjustments to the Fiscal Year "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2025-29" are hereby adopted: A. Amend the 2024-25 appropriation for the Fiber Optic Communications Systems- Citywide project, to add an additional $75,000 in Measure S funds. B. Amend the 2024-25 appropriation for the Old Town Parking Improvements project, to add an additional $55,000 in Measure S funds. C. Amend the 2024-25 appropriation for the Comprehensive General Plan Update project to add an additional $340,000 from the General Fund. D. Amend the Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program to add the following new project subject to future Planning Commission determination that the project is consistent with the City's General Plan: a. Traffic Signal Fiber Optic Extension project, utilizing $265,000 in Measure S funds. The budget and appropriation for these projects are set forth in Exhibit 1 and are hereby approved. Section 3. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 1 Ith day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the I Ph day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT 1 Capital Improvement Program Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country FIBER OPTIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS — CITYWIDE Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will provide for the design and installation of fiber optic cable and conduit at various locations throughout the City. Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's fiber optic communications and traffic signal system equipment throughout the City, including preparation of a Communications System Master Plan to guide the implementation of future j communications and technology improvements connecting traffic signals, facilities and other infrastructure throughout the City. This project will enhance the City's core value of a safe and prepared community, as well as transportation mobility R and connectivity as it relates to traffic signal communication. The Henn of Somhao Uifunoo Wine Country Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: Project was initiated in Fiscal Year 2021-22 and is on -going. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFO-21 / 789 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program 2024-25 2024-25 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Requests Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 100,000 40,000 40,000 31,000 12,000 10,000 5,000 198,000 5804-Construction 367,000 367,000 286,000 113,000 90,000 50,000 906,000 5802-Design & Environmental 89,418 410,583 500,000 5610- Equipment 75,000 75,000 75,000 Source of Funds: 4002-Measurice e SFacilities I 89 418I 510,582 407,000 75,000 4775,000 07,000 317,000 125,000 100,000 SS,000I 1,674,000 5,000 Total Fundine 1 89.4181 510.582 407.000 75.000 482.000 317.000 125.000 100.000 55.0001 1.679.000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 7(� _2 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country OLD TOWN PARKING IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project will include the design and eventual construction of a new parking structure in Old Town and other parking improvements within the Old Town district. The Old Town Parking Management Plan outlines a number of parking strategies that can be implemented in Old Town over time. Additional parking structures are anticipated to be constructed as part of the long term parking management strategy. Benefit: This project will satisfy the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project will fund incremental improvements as funding becomes available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW17-15 / 694 Level: III W City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Prior Years 2023-24 Current Mid -Year 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2028-29 Total Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Requests Revised Budget Projected Projected Projected Project Cost 5801-Administration 98,888 6,112 105,000 5802-Design & Environmental 153,535 741,465 895,000 5804-Construction 350,000 55,000 405,000 405,000 Tntnl F--lit,.— 7S7 A)7 7A7 S77 2Sn nnn SS nnn SS nnn _ _ _ 1 AnS nnn 4001-General asur Fund11,000 000�350,000 55,000 405,0000 405,00055,000 405,0000 405,000 4002-Measure S Total Fundine 1.000.000 - 350.000 55.000 55.000 1.405.000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 1lAlk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Description: California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive General Plan as the fundamental policy document for future development. It provides the framework for management and utilization of the City's physical, economic, and human resources. This document guides civic decisions regarding land use, conservation of existing housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provisions of supporting infrastructure and public services, 77 the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human -caused hazards. The City's `f General Plan was last updated in 2005. The General Plan will serve as the blueprint for the community for approximately the next fifteen years. This project will The Headd5u.&rn C.1&re Wine country update all of the elements of the General Plan and will also include the implementation of new legislation to ensure compliance with State Law. Benefit: The General Plan update satisfies all six of the City's core values: Healthy and Livable City; Economic Prosperity; Safe and Prepared Community; Sustainable City; Transportation, Mobility, and Connectivity; and Accountable and Responsive Local Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This project is ongoing. Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PW21-02 / 777 Level: I 2024-25 2024-25 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Requests Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Project Cost 5801-Administration 481,212 1,028,788 170,000 170,000 1,680,000 5802-Design & Environmental 3,960 696,040 500,000 170,000 670,000 500,000 1,870,000 Total Expenditures 485,172 1 1,724,828 500,000 340,000 840,000 500,000 3 550 000 Source of Funds: 4001-General Fund 1,000,0001 400,000 500,000 340,000 840,000 500,000 2,740,000 4025-Grants 310,0001 500,000 810,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Grants funding includes: $500,000 in Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP) funding provided by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and $310,000 in Senate Bill 2 Planning Grant. 2. In addition to these grants, $175,000 in funding has been granted through the Sustainable Communities Program, which supplemented Planning Department operating funds to start the General Plan update process and was reflected in account 001.161.999.5248. This grant was used for CEQA VMT analysis for Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, as required by SB743. Aft R TC(�he Heart of Southern California Wine Country TRAFFIC SIGNAL FIBER OPTIC EXTENSION Infrastructure Project City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2025-29 Capital Improvement Program Project Description: This project will provide the design and installation of fiber optic communications including conduit, cable, pullboxes, and related communication "Not 4 equipment to traffic signal operations. Various signalized intersections will be improved along the Margarita Road, Meadows Parkway, Date Street, and Nicolas Road corridors. Benefit: This project will upgrade the City's fiber optic communications and traffic signal system equipment throughout the City. This project builds out the City's traffic signal fiber communications network as defined in the City's Communications System Master Plan. This project will enhance the City's core value of a safe and prepared community, as well as transportation mobility and connectivity as it relates to traffic signal communication. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: This is a new project Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.5800.PWFO-21/PW25-01 Level: I 2024-25 2024-25 2024-25 Prior Years 2023-24 Adopted Mid -Year Revised 2025-26 2026-27 2028-29 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Requests Budget Projected Projected Projected Cost 5801-Administration 15,000 15,000 60,000 75,000 5804-Construction 1,350,000 1,350,000 5802-Design & Environmental 250,000 250,000 250,000 Total Exoenclitures 265,000 265,000 1,410,000 1,675,000 Source of Funds: 4256-DIF-Police Facilities 849,000 849,000 4002-Measure 5 265,000 265,000 8,150 273,150 4452-Unspecified 552,850 552,850 Total Fndin 265,000 265,000 1,410,000 1,675,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SALARY SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Salary Schedule, attached hereto, is hereby adopted pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The Salary Schedule shall become effective February 12, 2025, and may be, thereafter, amended. Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Salary Schedule and has the authority to select and appoint employees and approve Executive Staff employment agreements in accordance with the City of Temecula's Municipal Code and personnel policies. Section 4. In accordance with City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 2.6.030, the City Manager shall administer the City personnel system. This resolution specifically authorizes the City Manager to fix and alter the titles, compensation, and number of positions in the Schedule of Authorized Positions as needed, subject to the total personnel expenditure budget limitations approved by the City Council. Section 5. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are hereby rescinded. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this I It" day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11 th day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Salary Step-,�� MCP Only w Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base ADMINISTRATIVE Executive Assistant 4 951-004 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 Senior Administrative Assistant 4 952-004 Hourly 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Administrative Assistant 3 953-003 Hourly 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 Monthly 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 Annually 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 Senior Office Specialist 2 954-002 Hourly 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 Monthly 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 Annually 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 Office Specialist II 1 955-001 Hourly 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 Monthly 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 Annually 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 Office Specialist 1 1 956-001 Hourly 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 Monthly 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 Annually 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 Office Aide 1 959-001 Hourly 18.83 19.30 19.78 20.28 20.78 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 Monthly 3,263.87 3,345.33 3,428.53 3,515.20 3,601.87 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 Annually 39,166.40 40,144.00 41,142.40 42,182.40 43,222.40 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 ANALYST Principal Management Analyst 7 901-007 Hourly 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 Monthly 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 Annually 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 Senior Management Analyst 6 902-006 Hourly 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 Monthly 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 Annually 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 Management Analyst 5 903-005 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 Management Assistant 4 904-004 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 Management Aide III 3 905-003 Hourly 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 Management Aide II 2 906-002 Hourly 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 Monthly 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 Annually 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 Management Aide 1 1 907-001 Hourly 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 Monthly 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 Annually 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 Intern 1 908-001 Hourly 17.92 18.37 18.83 19.30 19.78 20.28 20.78 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 Monthly 3,106.13 3,184.13 3,263.87 3,345.33 3,428.53 3,515.20 3,601.87 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 Annually 37,273.60 38,209.60 39,166.40 40,144.00 41,142.40 42,182.40 43,222.40 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 PAGE 1 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development 8 300-008 Hourly 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 126.05 Monthly 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 21,848.67 Annually 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 262,184.00 Asst Dir. of Community Development 7 330-007 Hourly 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 Monthly 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 Annually 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY Building Official 7 331-007 Hourly 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 Monthly 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 Annually 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 Field Supervisor - Building 4 330-004 Hourly 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 Monthly 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 Annually 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 Plan Checker 4 308-004 Hourly 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 Monthly 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 Annually 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 Senior Building Inspector 3 332-003 Hourly 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 Monthly 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 Annually 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 Building Inspector II 2 333-002 Hourly 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 Monthly 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 Annually 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 Building Inspector 1 1 334-001 Hourly 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 Monthly 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 Annually 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - CODE ENFORCEMENT Code Enforcement Manager 5 339-005 Hourly 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 Monthly 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 Annually 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 Field Supervisor - Code Enforcement 4 343-004 Hourly 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 Monthly 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 Annually 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 Senior Code Enforcement Officer 3 340-003 Hourly 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 Code Enforcement Officer II 2 341-002 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 Code Enforcement Officer 1 1 342-001 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING Planning Manager 7 301-007 Hourly 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 Monthly 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 Annually 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 Principal Planner 6 302-006 Hourly 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 Monthly 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 Annually 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 PAGE 2 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 Senior Planner 5 303-005 Hourly Monthly 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 Annually 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 Associate Planner II 4 304-004 Hourly 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 Monthly 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 Annually 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 Associate Planner 1 3 305-003 Hourly 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 Monthly 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 Annually 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 Assistant Planner 2 306-002 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Planning Technician 1 307-001 Hourly 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 Monthly 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 Annually 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - SERVICES CommDev Processing Supervisor 4 320-004 Hourly 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 Monthly 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 Annually 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 Senior CommDev Technician 3 321-003 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 CommDev Technician 11 2 322-002 Hourly 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 CommDev Technician 1 1 323-001 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 CITY CLERK Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk 8 500-009 Hourly 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 Monthly 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 Annually 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 Deputy City Clerk 7 501-007 Hourly 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 Records Manager 6 510-006 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 Records Supervisor 4 511-004 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 Senior Records Coordinator 3 512-003 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 Records Coordinator 2 513-002 Hourly 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 Monthly 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 Annually 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 Records Technician 1 514-001 Hourly 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 Monthly 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 Annually 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 PAGE 3 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base CITY MANAGER City Manager (per Employment Contract) 9 100-009 Hourly 167.76 Monthly N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 29,079.30 Annually 348,951.55 Assistant City Manager 8 101-008 Hourly 107.93 110.63 113.40 116.24 119.15 122.12 125.17 128.30 131.52 134.79 138.17 141.63 145.17 148.80 152.51 Monthly 18,707.87 19,175.87 19,656.00 20,148.27 20,652.67 21,167.47 21,696.13 22,238.67 22,796.80 23,363.60 23,949.47 24,549.20 25,162.80 25,792.00 26,435.07 Annually 224,494.40 230,110.40 235,872.00 241,779.20 247,832.00 254,009.60 260,353.60 266,864.00 273,561.60 280,363.20 287,393.60 294,590.40 301,953.60 309,504.00 317,220.80 Deputy City Manager 8 102-008 Hourly 98.13 100.58 103.09 105.68 108.31 111.02 113.80 116.64 119.55 122.55 125.61 128.75 131.97 135.27 138.65 Monthly 17,009.20 17,433.87 17,868.93 18,317.87 18,773.73 19,243.47 19,725.33 20,217.60 20,722.00 21,242.00 21,772.40 22,316.67 22,874.80 23,446.80 24,032.67 Annually 204,110.40 209,206.40 214,427.20 219,814.40 225,284.80 230,921.60 236,704.00 242,611.20 248,664.00 254,904.00 261,268.80 267,800.00 274,497.60 281,361.60 288,392.00 Assistant to the City Manager 8 103-008 Hourly 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 Monthly 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 Annually 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 Economic Development Manager 6 120-006 Hourly 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 Monthly 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 Annually 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 COMMUNITY SERVICES Director of Community Services 8 600-008 Hourly 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 Monthly 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 Annually 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 Asst Director of Community Services 7 601-007 Hourly 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 Monthly 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 Annually 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 Community Services Superintendent 6 602-006 Hourly 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 Monthly 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 Annually 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 Community Services Manager 5 603-005 Hourly 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 Monthly 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 Annually 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 Community Services Supervisor II 4 610-004 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 Community Services Supervisor 1 4 611-004 Hourly 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 Monthly 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 Annually 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 Community Services Coordinator 11 3 612-003 Hourly 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 Community Services Coordinator 1 3 613-003 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 Community Services Specialist 11 2 614-002 Hourly 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 Monthly 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 Annually 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 Community Services Specialist 1 2 615-002 Hourly 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 Monthly 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 Annually 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 Community Services Assistant 1 616-001 Hourly 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 Monthly 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 Annually 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 PAGE 4 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 • Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 Senior Recreation Leader 1 617-001 Hourly Monthly 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 Annually 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 Recreation Leader 1 618-001 Hourly 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 Monthly 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 Annually 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 Recreation Assistant 1 619-001 Hourly 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 Monthly 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 Annually 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 COMMUNITY SERVICES - AQUATICS Aquatics Supervisor II 4 620-004 Hourly 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 Monthly 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 Annually 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 Aquatics Supervisor 1 4 621-004 Hourly 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 Aquatics Coordinator 3 622-003 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 Lead Lifeguard 2 623-002 Hourly 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 Monthly 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 Annually 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 Senior Lifeguard 1 624-001 Hourly 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 Monthly 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 Annually 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 Lifeguard 1 625-001 Hourly 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 Monthly 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 Annually 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 Water Safety Instructor 1 626-001 Hourly 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 Monthly 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 Annually 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 COMMUNITY SERVICES - DAY CAMP Day Camp Director 1 654-001 Hourly 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 Monthly 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 Annually 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 Assistant Day Camp Director 1 655-001 Hourly 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 Monthly 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 Annually 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 Day Camp Counselor 1 656-001 Hourly 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 Monthly 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 Annually 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 PAGE 5 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Salary Step-,�� Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base i COMMUNITY SERVICES - THEATER Theater Technical Coordinator II 3 640-003 Hourly 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 Theater Technical Coordinator 1 3 641-003 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 Theater Technical Specialist 11 2 642-002 Hourly 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 Monthly 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 Annually 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 Theater Technical Specialist 1 2 643-002 Hourly 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 Monthly 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 Annually 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 Theater Technical Assistant 1 644-001 Hourly 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 Monthly 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 Annually 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 FINANCE Director of Finance 8 200-008 Hourly 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 126.05 Monthly 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 21,848.67 Annually 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 262,184.00 Assistant Director of Finance 7 201-007 Hourly 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 Monthly 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 Annually 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 Fiscal Services Manager 6 202-006 Hourly 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 Monthly 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 Annually 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 Finance Manager 5 204-005 Hourly 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 Monthly 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 Annually 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 FINANCE - ACCOUNTING Senior Accountant 4 240-004 Hourly 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 Monthly 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 Annually 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 Accountant II 3 241-003 Hourly 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 Monthly 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 Annually 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 Accountant I 3 242-003 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 PAGE 6 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Salary Step-,�� MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base FINANCE - ACCOUNTING SUPPORT Accounting Support Supervisor 4 250-004 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 Senior Accounting Technician 3 251-003 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 Accounting Technician II 2 252-002 Hourly 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Accounting Technician 1 2 253-002 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 Accounting Assistant 1 254-001 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 Cashier 1 230-001 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 FINANCE - BUSINESS LICENSE Business License Supervisor 4 260-004 Hourly 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 Senior Business License Technician 3 261-003 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 Business License Technician 2 262-002 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 Business License Assistant 1 263-001 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 FINANCE - PAYROLL Payroll Manager 5 220-005 Hourly 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 Monthly 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 Annually 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 Payroll Administrator 4 222-004 Hourly 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 Monthly 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 Annually 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 Payroll Supervisor 4 221-004 Hourly 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 Monthly 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 Annually 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 Senior Payroll Coordinator 3 223-003 Hourly 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 Monthly 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 Annually 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 Payroll Coordinator 2 224-002 Hourly 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 Monthly 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 Annually 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 Payroll Technician 1 225-001 Hourly 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 PAGE 7 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 salary steps�� MCP Only I Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base FINANCE - PURCHASING Purchasing Manager 5 203-005 Hourly 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 Purchasing Supervisor 4 204-004 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 Senior Buyer 3 205-003 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Buyer II 2 206-002 Hourly 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 Monthly 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 Annually 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 Buyer 1 2 207-002 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 Purchasing Assistant 1 208-001 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 FIRE Field Supervisor - Fire 4 353-004 Hourly 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 Monthly 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 Annually 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 Senior Fire Inspector 4 350-003 Hourly 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 Monthly 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 Annually 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 Fire Inspector II 2 351-002 Hourly 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 Monthly 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 Annually 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 Fire Inspector 1 1 352-001 Hourly 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 Monthly 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 Annually 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 PAGE 8 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base HUMAN RESOURCES Director of HR/Risk Management 8 800-008 Hourly 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 Monthly 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 Annually 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 Asst Director of HR/Risk Management 7 801-007 Hourly 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 Monthly 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 Annually 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 HR Supervisor 4 804-004 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 Senior HR Technician 3 805-003 Hourly 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 Monthly 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 Annually 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 HR Technician 11 2 806-002 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 HR Technician 1 2 807-002 Hourly 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 HR Assistant 1 808-001 Hourly 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 Monthly 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 Annually 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Director of IT/Support Services 8 700-008 Hourly 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 Monthly 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 Annually 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 Asst Director of IT/Support Services 7 701-007 Hourly 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 Monthly 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 Annually 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 IT Manager 6 702-006 Hourly 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 Monthly 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 Annually 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 IT Administrator 5 703-005 Hourly 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 Monthly 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 Annually 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 PAGE 9 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 7 MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 IT Supervisor 4 704-004 Hourly Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 Senior IT Specialist 3 705-003 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 IT Specialist II 2 706-002 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 IT Specialist 1 2 707-002 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 IT Technician II 1 708-001 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 IT Technician 1 1 709-001 Hourly 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 Monthly 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 Annually 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 MEDIA/MARKETING Multimedia Coordinator 3 921-004 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 Multimedia Specialist 11 2 922-003 Hourly 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 Multimedia Specialist 1 2 923-002 Hourly 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 Multimedia Assistant 1 924-001 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 PUBLIC WORKS Director of PW/City Engineer 8 400-008 Hourly 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 114.19 117.05 119.97 122.97 126.05 Monthly 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 19,792.93 20,288.67 20,794.80 21,314.80 21,848.67 Annually 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 237,515.20 243,464.00 249,537.60 255,777.60 262,184.00 Assistant Director of Public Works 7 480-007 Hourly 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 98.47 100.93 103.45 106.04 108.68 111.41 Monthly 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 17,068.13 17,494.53 17,931.33 18,380.27 18,837.87 19,311.07 Annually 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 204,817.60 209,934.40 215,176.00 220,563.20 226,054.40 231,732.80 Program Manager 7 402-007 Hourly 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 Monthly 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 Annually 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 PUBLIC WORKS - CUSTODIAL Custodian 11 2 460-002 Hourly 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 Monthly 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 Annually 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 Custodian 1 1 461-001 Hourly 19.78 20.28 20.78 21.30 21.83 22.38 22.93 23.51 24.10 24.71 25.32 Monthly 3,428.53 3,515.20 3,601.87 3,692.00 3,783.87 3,879.20 3,974.53 4,075.07 4,177.33 4,283.07 4,388.80 Annually 41,142.40 42,182.40 43,222.40 44,304.00 45,406.40 46,550.40 47,694.40 48,900.80 50,128.00 51,396.80 52,665.60 PAGE 10 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Salary Step-,�� MCP Only M Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS - ENGINEERING Principal Civil Engineer 6 402-006 Hourly 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 96.06 Monthly 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 16,650.40 Annually 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 199,804.80 Senior Civil Engineer 5 403-005 Hourly 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 Monthly 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 Annually 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 Associate Civil Engineer 4 404-004 Hourly 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 Monthly 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 Annually 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 Associate Engineer II 4 405-004 Hourly 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 Monthly 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 Annually 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 Associate Engineer 1 3 406-003 Hourly 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 Monthly 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 Annually 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 Assistant Engineer II 2 407-002 Hourly 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 Monthly 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 Annually 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 Assistant Engineer 1 2 408-002 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 Engineering Technician II 1 409-001 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Engineering Technician 1 1 410-001 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 PUBLIC WORKS - INSPECTIONS Supervising PW Inspector 4 420-004 Hourly 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 Monthly 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 Annually 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 Senior PW Inspector 3 421-003 Hourly 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 PW Inspector II 2 422-002 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 PW Inspector 1 1 423-001 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 PUBLIC WORKS - MAINTENANCE Maintenance Manager 7 430-007 Hourly 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 87.03 89.21 91.43 93.73 Monthly 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 15,085.20 15,463.07 15,847.87 16,246.53 Annually 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 181,022.40 185,556.80 190,174.40 194,958.40 Maintenance Superintendent 6 431-006 Hourly 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 78.85 80.81 82.83 84.91 Monthly 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 13,667.33 14,007.07 14,357.20 14,717.73 Annually 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 164,008.00 168,084.80 172,286.40 176,612.80 PAGE 11 OF 13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 M Salary Step-,�� MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS - LANDSCAPE Maintenance Supervisor- Landscape 5 443-005 Hourly 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 Monthly 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 Annually 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 Field Supervisor - Landscape 4 444-004 Hourly 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 Senior Landscape Inspector 3 440-003 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 Landscape Inspector II 2 441-002 Hourly 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 Monthly 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 Annually 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 Landscape Inspector 1 1 442-001 Hourly 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 Monthly 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 Annually 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 PUBLIC WORKS - PARK ATTENDANT Supervising Park Attendant 4 490-004 Hourly 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 Monthly 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 Annually 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 Park Attendant III 3 491-003 Hourly 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 Park Attendant 11 2 492-002 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 Park Attendant 1 1 493-001 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS/PARKS Maintenance Supervisor - Streets/Parks 5 432-005 Hourly 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 Monthly 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 Annually 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 Field Supervisor - Streets/Parks 4 433-004 Hourly 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 Monthly 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 Annually 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 Lead Maintenance Worker - Streets/Parks 3 434-003 Hourly 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 Monthly 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 Annually 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 Maintenance Worker 11 - Streets/Parks 2 435-002 Hourly 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 Monthly 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 Annually 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 Maintenance Worker I - Streets/Parks 1 436-001 Hourly 25.95 26.60 27.27 27.95 28.64 29.37 30.10 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 Monthly 4,498.00 4,610.67 4,726.80 4,844.67 4,964.27 5,090.80 5,217.33 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 Annually 53,976.00 55,328.00 56,721.60 58,136.00 59,571.20 61,089.60 62,608.00 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 PAGE 12OF13 CITY OF TEMECULA SALARY SCHEDULE EFFECTIVE February 11, 2025 Adopted by City Council on February 11, 2025 Salary Step_,�� MCP Only Class Family / Title Level Class Code Time Base PUBLIC WORKS - FACILITIES Maintenance Supervisor- Facilities 5 432-005 Hourly 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 Monthly 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 Annually 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 Field Supervisor - Facilities 4 472-004 Hourly 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 Monthly 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 Annually 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 Lead Maintenance Worker- Facilities 3 473-003 Hourly 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 Monthly 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 Annually 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 Maintenance Worker II - Facilities 2 474-002 Hourly 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 Monthly 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 Annually 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 Maintenance Worker I - Facilities 1 475-001 Hourly 30.86 31.62 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 Monthly 5,349.07 5,480.80 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 Annually 64,188.80 65,769.60 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 PUBLIC WORKS - TRADES Maintenance Supervisor - Trades 5 482-005 Hourly 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 Monthly 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 Annually 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 Field Supervisor - Trades 4 483-004 Hourly 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 Monthly 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 Annually 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 Lead Maintenance Worker - Trades 3 484-003 Hourly 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 Monthly 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 Annually 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 Maintenance Worker 11 -Trades 2 485-002 Hourly 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 Monthly 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 Annually 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 Maintenance Worker I -Trades 1 486-001 Hourly 32.41 33.23 34.06 34.91 35.78 36.67 37.59 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 Monthly 5,617.73 5,759.87 5,903.73 6,051.07 6,201.87 6,356.13 6,515.60 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 Annually 67,412.80 69,118.40 70,844.80 72,612.80 74,422.40 76,273.60 78,187.20 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC SIGNALS Maintenance Supervisor - Signals 5 453-005 Hourly 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 64.71 66.33 67.99 69.69 71.43 73.22 75.05 76.92 Monthly 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 11,216.40 11,497.20 11,784.93 12,079.60 12,381.20 12,691.47 13,008.67 13,332.80 Annually 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 134,596.80 137,966.40 141,419.20 144,955.20 148,574.40 152,297.60 156,104.00 159,993.60 Field Supervisor - Signals 4 454-004 Hourly 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 58.63 60.09 61.60 63.13 Monthly 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 10,162.53 10,415.60 10,677.33 10,942.53 Annually 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 121,950.40 124,987.20 128,128.00 131,310.40 Senior Signal Technician 3 450-003 Hourly 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 53.11 54.44 55.80 57.20 Monthly 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 9,205.73 9,436.27 9,672.00 9,914.67 Annually 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 110,468.80 113,235.20 116,064.00 118,976.00 Signal Technician II 2 451-002 Hourly 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 50.56 51.82 Monthly 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 8,763.73 8,982.13 Annually 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 105,164.80 107,785.60 Signal Technician 1 2 452-002 Hourly 38.53 39.49 40.48 41.49 42.53 43.59 44.68 45.80 46.95 48.12 49.32 Monthly 6,678.53 6,844.93 7,016.53 7,191.60 7,371.87 7,555.60 7,744.53 7,938.67 8,138.00 8,340.80 8,548.80 Annually 80,142.40 82,139.20 84,198.40 86,299.20 88,462.40 90,667.20 92,934.40 95,264.00 97,656.00 100,089.60 102,585.60 PAGE 13 OF 13 RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2024-25 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position. Section 2. That each year a Mid -Year review is conducted of all Temecula Community Services (TCSD) operating budgets. Section 3. That the Mid -Year review has been completed and the recommended adjustments are reflected in the schedules attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2024-25 TCSD operating budgets are amended in accordance with the attached schedules. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 1 lth day of February, 2025. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 1 Ph day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: :•::� a u: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary N EXHIBIT A Temecula Community Services District Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 190 - TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Taxes and Franchises Special Tax (Measure C) 1,908,085 1,926,088 25,985 1,926,088 0 0.0 Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Contract Classes 1,021,502 1,200,000 710,660 1,200,000 0 0.0 Classes/Activities 119,859 67,640 38,868 68,239 599 0.9 % Facility Rentals 426,489 373,650 228,043 382,579 8,929 2.4 % Aquatics 245,054 237,966 191,437 238,966 1,000 0.4 Museum Admissions 103,604 94,335 55,441 97,435 3,100 3.3 Theater Admissions 270,541 295,000 159,061 297,000 2,000 0.7 Sports Leagues & Tournaments 301,153 231,993 123,894 224,193 (7,800) -3.4 % Day Camps 115,727 116,721 10,104 116,721 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 51,789 4,000 11,193 11,356 7,356 183.9 % Other 3,117 0 0 0 0 0.0 Reimbursements Other Reimbursements 18,077 93,077 195,630 106,510 13,433 14.4 Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S 13,254,402 16,175,055 8,087,528 15,864,726 (310,329) -1.9 % Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 102,984 87,851 29,171 93,277 5,426 6.2 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 17,942,382 20,903,376 9,867,016 20,627,090 (276,286) -1.3 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 10,594,330 12,630,487 6,220,371 12,580,493 (49,994) -0.4 Operations & Maintenance 4,870,642 5,623,695 2,648,148 5,846,761 223,066 4.0 Internal Service Fund Allocations 2,694,441 2,724,332 1,928,562 2,724,332 0 0.0 % Capital Outlay 37,765 0 0 0 0 0.0 Transfers 37,706 0 0 0 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 18,234,885 20,978,514 10,797,081 21,151,586 173,072 0.8 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (292,503) (75,138) (930,065) (524,496) (449,358) 598.0 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 916,999 624,497 624,497 Fund Balance, End of Year 624,497 549,359 100,000 Fund Description Citywide Operations reflects the collection of the Special Tax (Measure C) charged to households for recreation programs as well as fees for classes and activities. Accounts for facility operations, maintenance, and community recreation programs. Measure C was approved by residents in 1997 at a rate of $74.44 per parcel for the purpose of maintaining the City's parks, recreation facilities, arterial street lighting and traffic signals. The Special Tax revenue is allocated equally between TCSD and the General Fund to fund both recreation programs and parks maintenance. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 191 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREETLIGHT REPLACEMENT FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 54,595 8,000 33,928 43,442 35,442 443.0 Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In 200,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 254,595 208,000 133,928 243,442 35,442 17.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 254,595 208,000 133,928 243,442 35,442 17.0 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,069,628 1,324,223 1,324,223 Fund Balance, End of Year 1,324,223 1,532,223 1,567,665 Fund Description This fund was established to accumulate resources for the replacement of streetlight equipment, poles and lightbulbs, as the City has acquired street lights from Southern California Edison, and to install new street lights as needed throughout the City. Each year, $200,000 is transferred to this fund from the TCSD Service Level "B" Street Lights Fund (Fund 192). Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 192 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 654,945 658,307 4,506 658,307 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 18,319 3,000 11,976 15,399 12,399 413.3 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 673,264 661,307 16,482 673,706 12,399 1.9 % Expenditures by Category Transfers 200,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 0 0.0 Operations & Maintenance 341,632 484,000 136,395 484,000 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 541,632 684,000 236,395 684,000 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 131,632 (22,693) (219,913) (10,294) 12,399 -54.6 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 391,634 523,266 523,266 Fund Balance, End of Year 523,266 500,573 512,971 Fund Description Service Level B reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners. Service Level B includes only those parcels within residential subdivisions that receive residential street lighting services. This service level includes operational, administrative, maintenance and utility costs of residential streetlights. Each year, $200,000 is transferred from this fund to the TCSD Service Level "B" Streetlight Replacement Fund (Fund 191) to accommodate these costs. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 194 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 10,437,416 10,588,128 74,814 10,588,128 0 0.0 Recycling Program 63,832 27,553 0 27,553 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 61,480 8,000 32,119 30,067 22,067 275.8 Intergovernmental Revenues Grants 290,059 127,037 0 127,037 0 0.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 10,852,787 10,750,718 106,933 10,772,785 22,067 0.2 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 80,543 84,022 37,205 79,522 (4,500) -5.4 % Operations & Maintenance 10,407,408 11,122,080 146,389 11,122,080 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 10,487,951 11,206,103 183,594 11,201,603 (4,500) 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 364,835 (455,385) (76,661) (428,818) 26,567 -5.8 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 580,363 945,198 945,198 Fund Balance, End of Year 945,198 489,814 516,380 Fund Description Service Level D Fund is used to collect benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing refuse collection, recycling, and street sweeping throughout the City, which is provided by CR&R. In addition, Service Level D has received grants to increase recycling efforts Citywide. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 195 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 5,504 5,532 259 5,532 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 1,671 0 1,017 1,303 1,303 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 7,175 5,532 1,276 6,835 1,303 23.5 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 107 10,425 0 10,425 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 107 10,425 0 10,425 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 7,068 (4,893) 1,276 (3,590) 1,303 -26.6 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 33,055 40,123 40,123 Fund Balance, End of Year 40,123 35,230 36,532 Fund Description Service Level R Fund reflects the operational, administrative, construction and maintenance costs for certain unpaved roads that become inaccessible after inclement weather. Zone R-1 provides service in the Nicolas/Liefer Road area. The maximum rate that can be charged for Zone R-1 for an improved parcel is $115.26 and for an unimproved parcel is $57.62. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 196 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 254,788 256,750 0 256,750 0 0.0 % Harveston Lake Boat Revenue 2,325 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 16,275 4,450 9,131 11,702 7,252 163.0 % Other 176 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 6,405 0 3,998 5,000 5,000 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 279,969 261,200 13,129 273,452 12,252 4.7 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 12,750 14,601 7,246 14,601 0 0.0 % Operations & Maintenance 255,195 305,400 115,935 305,400 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 267,945 320,001 123,180 320,001 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 12,024 (58,801) (110,052) (46,548) 12,252 -20.8 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 360,756 372,780 372,780 Fund Balance, End of Year 372,780 313,979 326,232 Fund Description Service Level L Fund reflects the benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of maintaining the Harveston Lake Park. Expenditures include operational, administrative and maintenance costs. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 197 - TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Printing & Copies 10,349 8,919 5,422 8,919 0 0.0 % Fines and Forfeitures Fines & Forfeitures 33,807 28,446 6,364 28,446 0 0.0 % Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 18,978 0 6,313 7,650 7,650 100.0 % Lease/Rental Income 14,754 14,620 7,111 14,620 0 0.0 % Operating Transfers In Contribution From Measure S 818,085 1,293,125 646,563 1,127,563 (165,562) -12.8 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 895,973 1,345,110 671,772 1,187,198 (157,912) -11.7 % Expenditures by Category Salaries & Benefits 226,676 251,675 141,524 262,954 11,279 4.5 % Operations & Maintenance 528,862 657,337 172,175 625,058 (32,279) -4.9 % Internal Service Fund Allocations 388,609 446,566 231,122 446,566 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 1,144,148 1,355,578 544,822 1,334,578 (21,000) -1.5 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (248,174) (10,468) 126,951 (147,380) (136,912) 1,307.9 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 503,501 255,327 255,327 Fund Balance, End of Year 255,327 244,859 107,947 Fund Description The Library Fund is used to account for the maintenance and operations of the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library on Pauba Road. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 198 - PUBLIC ART FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Public Art 50,383 3,500 5,924 3,500 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 12,134 2,000 7,128 9,136 7,136 356.8 Total Revenues and Other Sources 62,517 5,500 13,051 12,636 7,136 129.7 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 8,460 113,226 6,316 113,226 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 8,460 113,226 6,316 113,226 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 54,057 (107,726) 6,735 (100,590) 7,136 -6.6 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 226,427 280,483 280,483 Fund Balance, End of Year 280,483 172,758 179,893 Fund Description This fund was established pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 5.08.040, whereby the fund serves a a depository for the fees paid in lieu of art as well as monetary donations for public art. The Public Art In Lieu fee is one -tenth of one percent of an eligible development project in excess of $100,000. Eligible uses of this fund include the design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance and insurance of public artwork; offering of performing arts programs on City property for the community; and art education programs on City property for the community. Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 501 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 38,282 37,932 0 37,932 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 688 0 503 652 652 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 38,970 37,932 503 38,584 652 1.7 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 32,714 37,766 13,822 37,766 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 32,714 37,766 13,822 37,766 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 6,256 166 (13,318) 818 652 392.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 18,201 24,456 24,456 Fund Balance, End of Year 24,456 24,622 25,274 Fund Description Service Level C Fund reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance throughout the City. Service Level C assesses only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and are separated into 32 zones. The rate levels for Zones 6 and 29, are subject to a Consumer Price Index -Urban Consumers (CPI-U) annual inflator while all other rate levels will not increase. Zones 30-32 will not be assessed, as the property owners have elected to have the landscaping maintained by the respective Homeowner's Associations (HOAs). Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 502 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 42,696 42,542 0 42,542 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 5,808 0 3,414 4,367 4,367 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 48,503 42,542 3,414 46,909 4,367 10.3 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 31,146 40,646 13,109 40,646 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 31,146 40,646 13,109 40,646 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 17,357 1,896 (9,694) 6,263 4,367 230.3 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 121,517 138,874 138,874 Fund Balance, End of Year 138,874 140,770 145,137 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 503 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Fund Balance, Beginning of Year Fund Balance, End of Year Fund Description 47,111 2,976 47,328 0 0 1,694 47,328 2,188 0 2,188 0.0 100.0 50,087 47,328 1,694 49,516 2,188 4.6 41,869 46,914 25,165 46,914 0 0.0 41,869 46,914 25,165 46,914 0 0.0 8,218 414 (23,471) 2,602 2,188 528.4 66,278 74,496 74,496 74,496 74,910 77,098 Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 504 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Total Revenues and Other Sources Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Fund Balance, Beginning of Year Fund Balance, End of Year Fund Description 6,445 315 6,394 0 0 151 6,394 186 0 186 0.0 100.0 6,760 6,394 151 6,580 186 2.9 6,348 6,796 3,833 8,296 1,500 22.1 6,348 6,796 3,833 8,296 1,500 22.1 413 (402) (3,683) (1,716) (1,314) 326.9 7,084 7,497 7,497 7,497 7,095 5,780 Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 505 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 39,025 39,025 0 39,025 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 1,399 0 879 1,119 1,119 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 40,424 39,025 879 40,144 1,119 2.9 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 34,545 37,326 12,676 37,326 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 34,545 37,326 12,676 37,326 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 5,879 1,699 (11,796) 2,818 1,119 65.9 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 32,278 38,157 38,157 Fund Balance, End of Year 38,157 39,856 40,975 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 506 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 29,923 31,452 0 31,452 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 2,105 0 1,267 1,626 1,626 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 32,027 31,452 1,267 33,078 1,626 5.2 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 33,988 31,634 6,951 31,634 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 33,988 31,634 6,951 31,634 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,961) (182) (5,684) 1,444 1,626 -893.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 54,222 52,261 52,261 Fund Balance, End of Year 52,261 52,079 53,706 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 507 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 15,219 15,308 0 15,308 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 588 0 403 520 520 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 15,807 15,308 403 15,828 520 3.4 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 10,374 15,224 5,332 15,224 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 10,374 15,224 5,332 15,224 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 5,432 84 (4,930) 604 520 619.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 12,141 17,574 17,574 Fund Balance, End of Year 17,574 17,658 18,178 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 508 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 137,146 137,025 0 137,025 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 5,029 0 3,019 3,881 3,881 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 142,175 137,025 3,019 140,906 3,881 2.8 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 135,347 137,214 48,498 137,214 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 135,347 137,214 48,498 137,214 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 6,828 (189) (45,479) 3,692 3,881 -2,053.5 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 126,392 133,220 133,220 Fund Balance, End of Year 133,220 133,031 136,912 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 509 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 5,162 5,106 0 5,106 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 1,365 0 747 949 949 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 6,527 5,106 747 6,055 949 18.6 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 7,852 5,143 1,122 5,143 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 7,852 5,143 1,122 5,143 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,325) (37) (375) 912 949 -2,566.1 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 30,892 29,567 29,567 Fund Balance, End of Year 29,567 29,530 30,480 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 510 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 9,744 9,744 0 9,744 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 752 0 411 520 520 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 10,496 9,744 411 10,264 520 5.3 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 9,023 9,477 3,985 9,477 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 9,023 9,477 3,985 9,477 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,473 267 (3,574) 787 520 194.8 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 15,873 17,347 17,347 Fund Balance, End of Year 17,347 17,614 18,134 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 511 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 2,450 2,450 0 2,450 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 187 0 106 135 135 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,637 2,450 106 2,585 135 5.5 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 2,125 2,495 947 2,495 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,125 2,495 947 2,495 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 513 (45) (841) 90 135 -300.3 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,986 4,499 4,499 Fund Balance, End of Year 4,499 4,454 4,589 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 512 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 96,658 96,396 0 96,396 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 3,859 0 2,228 2,885 2,885 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 100,517 96,396 2,228 99,281 2,885 3.0 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 90,433 95,603 46,813 95,603 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 90,433 95,603 46,813 95,603 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 10,085 793 (44,586) 3,678 2,885 363.8 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 89,206 99,290 99,290 Fund Balance, End of Year 99,290 100,083 102,968 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 513 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 34,197 34,224 0 34,224 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 1,484 0 884 1,140 1,140 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 35,681 34,224 884 35,364 1,140 3.3 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 30,103 33,895 13,700 33,895 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 30,103 33,895 13,700 33,895 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 5,578 329 (12,817) 1,469 1,140 346.4 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 33,933 39,511 39,511 Fund Balance, End of Year 39,511 39,840 40,980 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 514 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 14,909 14,774 0 14,774 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 614 0 330 421 421 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 15,523 14,774 330 15,195 421 2.8 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 13,815 14,770 6,411 14,770 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 13,815 14,770 6,411 14,770 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,707 4 (6,081) 425 421 10,519.5 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 13,263 14,970 14,970 Fund Balance, End of Year 14,970 14,974 15,395 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 515 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 9,800 9,800 0 9,800 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 699 0 416 530 530 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 10,499 9,800 416 10,330 530 5.4 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 8,356 9,571 2,925 9,571 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 8,356 9,571 2,925 9,571 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,144 229 (2,509) 759 530 231.6 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 15,065 17,209 17,209 Fund Balance, End of Year 17,209 17,438 17,968 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 516 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 38,034 37,800 0 37,800 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 4,025 0 2,305 2,971 2,971 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 42,059 37,800 2,305 40,771 2,971 7.9 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 30,137 37,152 21,091 37,152 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 30,137 37,152 21,091 37,152 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 11,923 648 (18,785) 3,619 2,971 458.5 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 84,692 96,615 96,615 Fund Balance, End of Year 96,615 97,263 100,233 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 517 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 2,171 2,116 0 2,116 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 132 0 78 100 100 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,303 2,116 78 2,216 100 4.7 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 2,037 2,561 718 2,561 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,037 2,561 718 2,561 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 265 (445) (640) (345) 100 -22.6 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 3,050 3,315 3,315 Fund Balance, End of Year 3,315 2,870 2,970 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 518 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 94,298 94,010 0 94,010 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 3,570 0 2,230 2,851 2,851 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 97,867 94,010 2,230 96,861 2,851 3.0 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 75,377 89,405 28,835 89,405 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 75,377 89,405 28,835 89,405 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 22,490 4,605 (26,605) 7,456 2,851 61.9 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 74,795 97,285 97,285 Fund Balance, End of Year 97,285 101,890 104,741 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 519 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 54,703 54,450 0 54,450 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 3,843 0 2,201 2,826 2,826 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 58,546 54,450 2,201 57,276 2,826 5.2 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 47,637 58,752 22,594 58,752 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 47,637 58,752 22,594 58,752 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 10,909 (4,302) (20,393) (1,476) 2,826 -65.7 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 83,912 94,821 94,821 Fund Balance, End of Year 94,821 90,519 93,345 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 520 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 177,692 177,975 0 177,975 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 12,759 0 7,509 9,595 9,595 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 190,451 177,975 7,509 187,570 9,595 5.4 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 152,424 178,056 53,330 178,056 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 152,424 178,056 53,330 178,056 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 38,027 (81) (45,821) 9,514 9,595 -11,846.0 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 275,202 313,229 313,229 Fund Balance, End of Year 313,229 313,148 322,743 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 521 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 228,618 228,201 0 228,201 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 8,680 0 5,097 6,522 6,522 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 237,298 228,201 5,097 234,723 6,522 2.9 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 215,450 229,693 77,754 229,693 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 215,450 229,693 77,754 229,693 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 21,848 (1,492) (72,657) 5,030 6,522 -437.1 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 201,451 223,299 223,299 Fund Balance, End of Year 223,299 221,807 228,329 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 522 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 4,408 4,408 0 4,408 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 577 0 337 431 431 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 4,985 4,408 337 4,839 431 9.8 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 3,454 4,479 1,583 4,479 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 3,454 4,479 1,583 4,479 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,531 (71) (1,246) 360 431 -607.2 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 12,304 13,835 13,835 Fund Balance, End of Year 13,835 13,764 14,195 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 523 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 8,392 8,400 0 8,400 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 1,428 0 830 1,064 1,064 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 9,820 8,400 830 9,464 1,064 12.7 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 5,873 8,506 1,925 8,506 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 5,873 8,506 1,925 8,506 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 3,947 (106) (1,095) 958 1,064 -1,003.4 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 29,537 33,484 33,484 Fund Balance, End of Year 33,484 33,378 34,442 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 524 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 162,633 162,100 0 162,100 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 2,364 0 1,081 1,229 1,229 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 164,997 162,100 1,081 163,329 1,229 0.8 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 157,499 162,156 78,807 162,156 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 157,499 162,156 78,807 162,156 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 7,499 (56) (77,725) 1,173 1,229 -2,195.0 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 66,809 74,307 74,307 Fund Balance, End of Year 74,307 74,251 75,480 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 525 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 44,323 44,000 0 44,000 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 3,832 0 2,267 2,893 2,893 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 48,155 44,000 2,267 46,893 2,893 6.6 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 34,406 44,535 13,232 44,535 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 34,406 44,535 13,232 44,535 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 13,749 (535) (10,965) 2,358 2,893 -540.7 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 79,467 93,216 93,216 Fund Balance, End of Year 93,216 92,681 95,574 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 526 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERY TRADITION FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 2,160 2,160 0 2,160 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 120 0 71 91 91 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,280 2,160 71 2,251 91 4.2 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 1,748 2,170 986 2,170 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 1,748 2,170 986 2,170 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 532 (10) (915) 81 91 -912.6 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 2,561 3,093 3,093 Fund Balance, End of Year 3,093 3,083 3,174 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 527 - SERVICE LEVEL" C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 9,323 9,100 0 9,100 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 500 0 288 367 367 100.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 9,823 9,100 288 9,467 367 4.0 % Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 8,260 9,212 4,064 9,212 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 8,260 9,212 4,064 9,212 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 1,563 (112) (3,776) 255 367 -327.6 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 11,183 12,745 12,745 Fund Balance, End of Year 12,745 12,633 13,000 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 528 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 234,022 232,974 0 232,974 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 20,819 0 6,803 7,562 7,562 100.0 % Other 322,833 0 0 0 0 0.0 % Total Revenues and Other Sources 577,674 232,974 6,803 240,536 7,562 3.2 % Expenditures by Category Transfers 411,891 39,809 0 39,809 0 0.0 % Operations & Maintenance 212,152 237,459 88,446 237,459 0 0.0 % Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 624,043 277,268 88,446 277,268 0 0.0 % Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (46,369) (44,294) (81,643) (36,732) 7,562 -17.1 % Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 310,797 264,428 264,428 Fund Balance, End of Year 264,428 220,135 227,696 Fund Description Alk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 529 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT FUND Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Licenses, Permits and Service Charges Assessments 4,475 4,903 0 4,903 0 0.0 Use of Money and Property Investment Interest 475 0 301 385 385 100.0 Total Revenues and Other Sources 4,949 4,903 301 5,288 385 7.9 Expenditures by Category Operations & Maintenance 2,325 3,974 953 3,974 0 0.0 Total Expenditures and Other Financing Uses 2,325 3,974 953 3,974 0 0.0 Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 2,624 929 (652) 1,314 385 41.5 Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 9,562 12,186 12,186 Fund Balance, End of Year 12,186 13,115 13,501 Fund Description IL f Adk The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Year 2024-25 Quarterly Budget Report FUND: 530 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES FUND % Change 2024-25 Year to Date 2024-25 Q2 from 2023-24 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2024 Budget Adjustments Budget Revenues by Source Use of Money and Property Investment Interest Total Revenues and Other Sources Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Fund Balance, Beginning of Year Fund Balance, End of Year Fund Description 0 0 922 1,177 1,177 100.0 % 0 0 922 1,177 1,177 100.0 % 0 0 922 1,177 1,177 100.0 % 36,062 36,062 36,062 36,062 36,062 37,239 Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance Amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Regarding Off -Site Wayfinding Signs Within the Temecula Auto Mall PREPARED BY: Mark Collins, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.28.290 OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF -SITE WAYFINDING SIGNS IN THE AUTO MALL, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (13)(3) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The proposed ordinance would make amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Listed below is a summary of the proposed changes to the Municipal Code, each of which is discussed in greater detail in the analysis section, which follows: Changes to Title 17: 1. Wayfinding Signage Temecula Auto Mall — Add provisions that would allow for directional (wayfinding) signage within the existing right of way exclusively within the Temecula Auto Mall. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula City Council adopted the Municipal Code in January 1990. Since its adoption, the City Council has periodically made amendments to various sections of the Code to improve its clarity, make corrections and implement policy. The proposal would make amendments to Title 17 (zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. City staff met with the Planning Commission Municipal Code Maintenance Ad Hoc Subcommittee on July 17, 2024. (Commissioners Hagel and Ruiz). The Subcommittee had questions related to sign location and design and were supportive of the project. City staff met with the City Council General Plan Update Ad Hoc Subcommittee on July 23, 2024. (then Mayor James Stewart and Councilmember Jessica Alexander). The Subcommittee was supportive of the idea and directed staff to move forward with public hearings. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65800, the Planning Commission is required to review and make recommendations to the City Council regarding zoning regulations and amendments to Title 17 Zoning (Development Code) of the Temecula Municipal Code. The item was presented at a public hearing to the Planning Commission on January 15, 2025. At the hearing, language related to the funding of the proposed wayfinding signage was struck from the proposal for clarity and Resolution No. 2025-01 was recommended for adoption by a 5-0 vote. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Ordinance itself does not have a direct fiscal impact if adopted, any costs for future signage would be through a separate agreement with a sign vendor. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-01 3. Notice of Public Hearing 4. Notice of Exemption ORDINANCE NO. 2025- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.28.290 OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF -SITE WAYFINDING SIGNS IN THE AUTO MALL, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"). B. The Municipal Code amendments are being made to allow and to set standards for off -site wayfinding signs in commercial districts within the Auto Mall. C. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on January 15, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-01, recommending that the City Council approve the Title 17 amendments. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on February 11, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council closed the public hearing and considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings: 1. The Auto Mall, an area along Ynez Road, DLR Drive and Solana Way on which a concentration of automobile dealerships are located, provides customers the opportunity to quickly and conveniently visit multiple dealerships in a single visit to the area. While each dealership located within the Auto Mall may have its own Freestanding Building or Single -Tenant Identification Sign to identify its location, the high concentration of dealerships and the proliferation of such signage, and three roads comprising the Auto Mall, make it difficult for visitors to the Auto Mall to locate and navigate to any particular vendor, a difficulty which is exacerbated by the large size of the land parcels on which the dealerships are situated and the many access driveways on such parcels. The Auto Mall's location along a busy thoroughfare with secondary roads and the multiple driveway entrances dedicated to different business services offered on site and hundreds of yards apart result in: (1) congested roads caused by drivers of motor vehicles slowing down and searching for particular dealerships, entrances, or signs giving directions thereto delaying traffic in the area, (2) congested roads caused by drivers of motor vehicles having to slow or stop abruptly to turn into properties or make U-turns along the major thoroughfare to access individual dealerships delaying traffic in the area, and (3) a proliferation of confusing directional signage erected by individual dealerships for the purpose of directing drivers of motor vehicles onto their properties. 2. "Wayfinding" or "Directional" Government Signs are needed by dealerships in the Auto Mall to a greater degree than other businesses because (1) visitors to the Auto Mall frequently visit multiple dealerships during a single visit to the area and need to safely navigate between each dealership property and (2) Auto Mall dealerships are located on large parcels of land on either side of a major thoroughfare, making it difficult for drivers moving through the Auto Mall area to visually locate and navigate to any particular dealership property while safely traveling with the normal flow of traffic. Thus, despite the availability of maps and other digital navigation technology, the most efficient method of directing drivers of motor vehicles in the Auto Mall is the use of Government Signs posted at the entrances to the Auto Mall area and at other critical locations. 3. Businesses outside of the Auto Mall that do not occupy such large parcels of land with multiple access points along major thoroughfares and without retail clientele who commonly visit multiple neighboring vendors during a single visit have less need for such Government Signs. 4. Businesses within the Auto Mall require the installation of uniform Government Signs to avoid confusion among drivers of motor vehicles, promote traffic safety, and reduce the visual blight caused by the proliferation of directional signs in the Auto Mall. To that end, other wayfinding signs, including travel direction signs, are prohibited except as provided in this Ordinance. Section 3. A new Subsection F.2 is added to Section 17.28.050 (Exempt Signs) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) to read as follows: 442. Offsite Wayfinding Signs for Vehicle Dealerships at Temecula Auto Mall. a. Findings. i. Vehicle dealerships in the Auto Mall are highly visible from the I-15 Freeway, however, these dealership entrances are difficult to locate once vehicles have exited the freeway. ii. The dealerships attract a constant influx of new visitors to the area of the Auto Mall. Adequate Wayfinding Signage is necessary to ensure the safety of the community by providing 2 guidance to nonresidents or the general public unfamiliar with the area thereby reducing congestions and illegal turns. The Wayfinding Signs will help ensure that the general public can safely and easily find the dealerships. ii. The Wayfinding Signs for the dealerships shall not advertise or highlight any brand or product and shall not show the logos of or any information for the dealerships or the products they sell. The signs must merely provide the names of the dealerships in a visible, uniform font in colors that do not reflect any brands or logos. iii. The Wayfinding Signs are intended to serve public purpose and conform to the intent and language of the City's General Plan. b. General Requirements. i. The provisions of this Subsection 17.28.050.F.2 shall apply to businesses selling vehicles in the Temecula Auto Mall as shown on Exhibit 17.04.020 Area B ("Auto Mall") of this Code. ii. A comprehensive signage program for off -site Wayfinding Signs, a type of Government Sign, for the Auto Mall shall conform to the provisions of this Subsection F.2 and be approved by resolution of the City Council. Wayfinding Signs are directional signs, maps, or other graphics used to convey location and directions to travelers. The signage program shall include the number, location, dimensions, sign area, colors, and design of the directional signs. Such signage shall comply with all the provisions of Chapter 17.28 (Signs). iii. The City shall install the Wayfinding Signs as part of the signage program after receipt of payment from automobile dealerships located in the Auto Mall. iv. Sign structure installations shall include "breakaway" design features where required in right-of-way areas. V. The Wayfinding Signs shall only show the name of the dealership and an arrow providing direction to the dealership. The Wayfinding Signs for the dealerships shall not be illuminated and not advertise or highlight any brand, logo or product or show the logos of or any information about the dealerships or their products. vi. The maximum height of the Wayfinding Signs shall not exceed twelve (12) feet, and the maximum width shall not exceed six feet. vii. Wayfinding Signs shall not obstruct the use of sidewalks, walkways, bike and hiking trails; the visibility of vehicles, pedestrians, or traffic control signs; or be placed in the immediate vicinity of street intersections." Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, which do not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. 3 Section 4. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 5. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 111h day of February, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk PC RESOLUTION NO.2025-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.28.290 OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF -SITE WAYFINDING SIGNS IN THE AUTO MALL, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3)." Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code on January 15, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. C. The proposed amendments to Title 17 are consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan, and each element thereof. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A". E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: The Planning Commission, in recommending adoption of the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ("Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: 1. The proposed use is allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the general plan. The proposed Code Amendments do not change the types of uses allowed in the City. The proposed Code Amendments add language expanding the scope of exempt signage within the Temecula Auto Mall, specific to automotive dealerships, to include offsite directional signage only. 2. The proposed uses are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the general plan. The proposed changes to Title 17 conform with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan. The proposed changes allow for offsite directional (wayfinding) signs within the public right-of-way (ROW) exclusively in the existing Temecula Auto Mall, which furthers Policy 1.1 of the Economic Development Element of the Temecula General Plan, which is to "Attract and retain a diverse range of business and industry that complements Temecula's character, utilizes the local workforce, and takes advantage of Temecula's location." Additionally, the proposed amendments implement Goal 2 of the Community Design Element of the Temecula General Plan which states "Design excellence in site planning, architecture, landscape architecture and signs." The amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code do not result in an inconsistency between the Temecula Municipal Code and the adopted General Plan. 3. The proposed uses are to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. The proposed amendments to Title 17 would provide for wayfinding signage for the Temecula Auto Mall and do not amend any land uses, nor do the amendments increase the intensity of any existing uses. The amendments are consistent with the general plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the proposed Ordinance No. 2025- is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, which do not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. Instead, the amendments merely allow for wayfinding signs to be erected in the Auto Mall. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Recommendation. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council approve Planning Application No. LR24-0435, a proposed Ordinance as set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15'h day of January, 2025. ATTEST: 64Y%1-11 Matt Peters Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2025-01 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 151h day of January 2025, by the following vote: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Hagel, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watson, Watts None None None Matt Peters Secretary ORDINANCE NO. 2025- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 17.28.290 OF TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR OFF -SITE WAYFINDING SIGNS IN THE AUTO MALL, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (11)(3). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. City staff identified the need to make revisions and clarifications to portions of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"). B. The Municipal Code amendments are being made to allow and to set standards for off -site wayfinding signs in commercial districts within the Auto Mall. C. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendments to Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code ("Ordinance") on January 15, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2025-_, recommending that the City Council approve the Title 17 amendments. E. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the Ordinance on February 11, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing, as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council closed the public hearing and considered the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed Ordinance, hereby makes the following additional findings: 1. The Auto Mall, an area along Ynez Road, DLR Drive and Solana Way on which a concentration of automobile dealerships are located, provides customers the opportunity to quickly and conveniently visit multiple dealerships in a single visit to the area. While each dealership located within the Auto Mall may have its own Freestanding Building or Single -Tenant 1 Identification Sign to identify its location, the high concentration of dealerships and the proliferation of such signage, and three roads comprising the Auto Mall, make it difficult for visitors to the Auto Mall to locate and navigate to any particular vendor, a difficulty which is exacerbated by the large size of the land parcels on which the dealerships are situated and the many access driveways on such parcels. The Auto Mall's location along a busy thoroughfare with secondary roads and the multiple driveway entrances dedicated to different business services offered on site and hundreds of yards apart result in: (1) congested roads caused by drivers of motor vehicles slowing down and searching for particular dealerships, entrances, or signs giving directions thereto delaying traffic in the area, (2) congested roads caused by drivers of motor vehicles having to slow or stop abruptly to turn into properties or make U-turns along the major thoroughfare to access individual dealerships delaying traffic in the area, and (3) a proliferation of confusing directional signage erected by individual dealerships for the purpose of directing drivers of motor vehicles onto their properties. 2. "Wayfinding" or "Directional" Government Signs are needed by dealerships in the Auto Mall to a greater degree than other businesses because (1) visitors to the Auto Mall frequently visit multiple dealerships during a single visit to the area and need to safely navigate between each dealership property and (2) Auto Mall dealerships are located on large parcels of land on either side of a major thoroughfare, making it difficult for drivers moving through the Auto Mall area to visually locate and navigate to any particular dealership property while safely traveling with the normal flow of traffic. Thus, despite the availability of maps and other digital navigation technology, the most efficient method of directing drivers of motor vehicles in the Auto Mall is the use of Government Signs posted at the entrances to the Auto Mall area and at other critical locations. 3. Businesses outside of the Auto Mall that do not occupy such large parcels of land with multiple access points along major thoroughfares and without retail clientele who commonly visit multiple neighboring vendors during a single visit have less need for such Government Signs. 4. Businesses within the Auto Mall require the installation of uniform Government Signs to avoid confusion among drivers of motor vehicles, promote traffic safety, and reduce the visual blight caused by the proliferation of directional signs in the Auto Mall. To that end, other wayfinding signs, including travel direction signs, are prohibited except as provided in this Ordinance. Section 3. A new Subsection F.2 is added to Section 17.28.050 (Exempt Signs) of Chapter 17.28 (Sign Standards) of Title 17 (Zoning) to read as follows: 662. Offsite Wayfinding Signs for Vehicle Dealerships at Temecula Auto Mall. a. Findings. i. Vehicle dealerships in the Auto Mall are highly visible from the I-15 Freeway, however, these dealership entrances are difficult to locate once vehicles have exited the freeway. ii. The dealerships attract a constant influx of new visitors to the area of the Auto Mall. Adequate Wayfinding Signage is necessary to ensure the safety of the community by providing 2 guidance to nonresidents or the general public unfamiliar with the area thereby reducing congestions and illegal turns. The Wayfinding Signs will help ensure that the general public can safely and easily find the dealerships. ii. The Wayfinding Signs for the dealerships shall not advertise or highlight any brand or product and shall not show the logos of or any information for the dealerships or the products they sell. The signs must merely provide the names of the dealerships in a visible, uniform font in colors that do not reflect any brands or logos. iii. The Wayfinding Signs are intended to serve public purpose and conform to the intent and language of the City's General Plan. b. General Requirements. i. The provisions of this Subsection 17.28.050.F.2 shall apply to businesses selling vehicles in the Temecula Auto Mall as shown on Exhibit 17.04.020 Area B ("Auto Mall") of this Code. ii. A comprehensive signage program for off -site Wayfinding Signs, a type of Government Sign, for the Auto Mall shall conform to the provisions of this Subsection F.2 and be approved by resolution of the City Council. Wayfinding Signs are directional signs, maps, or other graphics used to convey location and directions to travelers. The signage program shall include the number, location, dimensions, sign area, colors, and design of the directional signs. Such signage shall comply with all the provisions of Chapter 17.28 (Signs). iii. The City shall install the Wayfinding Signs as part of the signage program after receipt of payment from automobile dealerships located in the Auto Mall. iv. Sign structure installations shall include "breakaway" design features where required in right-of-way areas. V. The Wayfinding Signs shall only show the name of the dealership and an arrow providing direction to the dealership. The Wayfinding Signs for the dealerships shall not be illuminated and not advertise or highlight any brand, logo or product or show the logos of or any information about the dealerships or their products. vi. The maximum height of the Wayfinding Signs shall not exceed twelve (12) feet, and the maximum width shall not exceed six feet. vii. Wayfinding Signs shall not obstruct the use of sidewalks, walkways, bike and hiking trails; the visibility of vehicles, pedestrians, or traffic control signs; or be placed in the immediate vicinity of street intersections." Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed Municipal Code amendments are minor policy changes, which do not result in any increase in the intensity or density of any land use above what is currently allowed. A Notice of Exemption has been prepared and will be filed in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. 3 Section 4. Severability. If any section or provision of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, or contravened by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining sections or provisions of this Ordinance shall remain valid. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section or provision thereof, regardless of the fact that any one or more section(s) or provision(s) may be declared invalid or unconstitutional or contravened via legislation. Section 5. Certification. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula the 11 th day of February, 2025. ATTEST: Randi Johl City Clerk [SEAL] 4 Brenden Kalfus, Mayor STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 1 I `h day of February, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl City Clerk Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: Long Range Project No. LR24-0435 Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending section 17.28.290 of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to establish standards and requirements for off -site wayfinding signs in the auto mall. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), staff has determined that the proposed ordinance is categorically exempt from environmental review and recommends that a Notice of Exemption be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15061(b)(3)). PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590 DATE OF HEARING: February 11, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed draft ordinance may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Mark Collins, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 506-5172. City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProces sina(& asrclkrec. com February 12, 2025 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Long Range Project Number LR24-0435, an amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the City will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mark Collins at email: Mark.Collins@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Matt Peters Director of Community Development Enclosures: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Long Range Project No. LR24-0435 Municipal Code Update Description of Project: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending section 17.28.290 of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to establish standards and requirements for off - site wayfinding signs in the auto mall. Project Location: Citywide Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula The City Council approved the above -described project on February 1 It', 2025, and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ❑Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section ® Categorical Exemption: (Section 15061 (b)(3)) 15269(a)); ❑ Other: Section 15162 Categorical Exemption ❑Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed ordinance has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review as there is no possibility that the proposed ordinance would have a significant impact on the environment pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). The proposed ordinance amends the municipal code to allow for off -site wayfinding signage. The amendments do not authorize any construction nor changes to the physical environment. Contact Person/Title: Mark Collins, Associate Planner Telephone Number (951) 506-5172 Signature: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Matt Peters, Director of Community Development DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Consider Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Long Range Project No. LR23-0494) PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve a fourth amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Long Range Project No. LR23-0494) and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR23-0494) BACKGROUND: The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved by the City Council on October 11, 1994, by the adoption of Resolution 94-101. On July 27, 1999, the City Council adopted Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19.On January 28, 2003, the City Council adopted Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan by the adoption of Ordinance 03-02. On July 22, 2008, the City Council adopted Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan by the adoption of Ordinance 08-03. On December 19, 2023, the City of Temecula initiated a Specific Plan Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center for a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. Specific Plan Amendment For the purposes of the analysis below the Specific Plan is comprised of two (2) Planning Areas as shown on the aerial below which includes an overlay of Planning Area 1 and Planning Area 2. V -t-+.e F r5 i May �� •,�t�'•, � ;.��'�r Al -� tr1 M+', All. -`p•j•� __ — _ , e Planning Area 1 consists of Bel Villago, The Commons at Temecula, Regal Edwards Theater, and other dining and retail establishments including Islands and Chick-fil-A. Planning Area 2 includes the Promenade Temecula mall "core", Costco, the restaturants and retail outlets along Ynez Road and Winchester Road including Phil's BBQ, Benihana, and Karl Strauss, and Barnes & Noble. The analysis below was performed using gross leasable area provided to staff directly from Promenade Temecula as well as research done by staff into all existing issued building permits and projects that have been entitled and vested but not yet constructed. The Specific Plan allocates specific gross leasable area that can be constructed in the various planning areas. Beginning in November 2023 and lasting until October 2024 the City of Temecula Community Development Department performed a square footage analysis of the Specific Plan to determine the gross leasable area square footage of constructed and/or entitled (vested but not yet constructed) projects versus the allowable gross leasable area square footage within the Specific Plan. The results of the analysis show that Planning Area 1 of the Specific Plan is underbuilt by 374,900 square feet of gross leasable area and Planning Area 2 is overbuilt/entitled by 34,754 square feet of gross leasable area (shown in table below). TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER/PROMENADE TEMECULA SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY FOR PLANNING AREAS 1 & 2 Planning Area 1 Specific Plan GLA 1,055,000 GLA GLA BuiltfEntitled 680,100 GLA Sq Ft 374,900 Remaining Allowed Remaining Planning Area 2 Specific Plan GLA 1,375,000 GLA GLA BuiltfEntitled 1,409,754 GLA Sq Ft 134,754) Overbuilt Allowed Remaining Given this analysis, and given that the last entitlement in Planning Area 2 occurred in 2014 with construction completed in 2016, the revised "baseline" gross leasable square footage for the Specific Plan shall be 2,464,754 square feet for Planning Areas 1 & 2 combined, 1,055,000 square feet for Planning Area 1, and 1,409,754 square feet for Planning Area 2. Moving forward, projects within either individual planning area that propose new square footage that exceeds the revised baseline square footage shall be required to perform an environmental analysis based on the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. Any reference in the Specific Plan to 1,375,000 gross leasable area in Planning Area 2 shall be replaced with 1,409,754 gross leasable area. Any reference in the Specific Plan to 2,430,000 gross leasable area in the entire Specific Plan area shall be replaced with 2,464,754 gross leasable area. Planning Commission Recommendation Staff presented the project to the Planning Commission on December 18, 2024. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Resolution and make a finding of exemption. There were no public speakers at the meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The Resolution which approves a Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan has no fiscal impact on the City of Temecula. ENVIRONMENTAL: The proposed Resolution, which approves an amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the proposed Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the proposed Resolution will establish a new baseline of gross leasable area square footage for the Specific Plan based on projects that are already constructed or entiled/vested and does not propose any new gross leasable area square footage. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map 2. Resolution — Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Fourth Amendment 3. Exhibit A — Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Fourth Amendment 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2024-25 Recommending approval of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Fourth Amendment 5. Notice of Exemption 6. Notice of Public Hearing 0 4uc LT T"tVA-, ZZ,ti RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR23-0494) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7) was approved by the City Council on October 11, 1994 by the adoption of Resolution No. 94-101. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on January 28. 2003 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-3 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". B. On December 19, 2023, the City of Temecula processed Long Range Project No. LR23-0494, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan is a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. D. On December 18, 2024 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan , the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2024-25 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR 23-0494)" F. On February 11, 2025 the City Council considered the Amendment No 4 to the Specific Plan at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project prior to and at the public hearing. G. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE Temecula Regional Center SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR23-0494)" Resolution No. 2025- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. H. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section, 17.05.010, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan discusses the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not make any material changes to the Specific Plan that would impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. Policy 2.5 of the General Plan Economic Development Element is to promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high -quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan provides for opportunities for a broader selection of high -quality goods and services and the Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan details the amount of gross leasable area square feet available for the goods and services. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City s development code because the City will require that all new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines land uses, and establishes development standards, regulations and building criteria for each land use type. The Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan revises the amount ofgross leasable area square feet within each planning area to reflect existing conditions. These square footages are based on projects that have either already been entitled or were entitled several years ago and, therefore, the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare will not be impacted by this technical change. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subjectproperty is an existing regional mall and associated shopping centers all within the Specific Plan. The Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not propose any development or create any new land use designations. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. No development or development standards are proposed as a part of Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan. Future development within the Specific Plan area will adhere to the development standards of the Specific Plan which will ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. CEQA. This Resolution, which approves the Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the this Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the this Resolution will establish a new baseline of gross leasable area square footage for the Specific Plan based on projects that are already constructed or entiled/vested and does not propose any new gross leasable area square footage. Section 4. Approval of Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7). The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and directs the Community Development Director to incorporate Exhibit "A" as part of the Specific Plan. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this l lth day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 1Ph day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk FOURTH AMENDMENT TO TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan ("Specific Plan") allocates specific gross leasable area ("GLA") that can be constructed in the various planning areas. Beginning in November 2023 and lasting until October 2024 the City of Temecula Community Development Department performed a square footage analysis of the Specific Plan to determine the gross leasable area square footage of constructed and/or entitled (vested but not yet constructed) projects versus the allowable gross leasable area square footage within the Specific Plan. The results of the analysis show that Planning Area 1 of the Specific Plan is underbuilt by 374,900 square feet of gross leasable area and Planning Area 2 is overbuilt/entitled by 34,754 square feet of gross leasable area (shown in table below). The Specific Plan does not allow for density or square footage transfers between the Planning Areas. TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTERIPROMENADE TEMECULA SQUARE FOOTAGE SUMMARY FOR PLANNING AREAS 1 &2 PLanningArea 1 Specific Plan GLA 1,055,000 GLA GLA BuiLVEntitLed 680,100 GLASq Ft 374,900 Remaining ALLowed Remaining PLanningArea 2 Specific Plan GLA 1,375,000 GLA 1,375,000 GLA BuRVEntitled 1,409,754 GLA Sq Ft 134,754) OverE�uilt Allowed Given this analysis, and given that the last entitlement in Planning Area 2 occurred in 2014 with construction completed in 2016, the revised "baseline" gross leasable square footage for the Specific Plan shall be 2,464,754 square feet for Planning Areas 1 & 2 combined, 1,055,000 square feet for Planning Area 1, and 1,409,754 square feet for Planning Area 2. This is a technical update to reflect existing conditions as they have existed for the last eight (8) years. Moving forward, projects within either individual planning area that propose new square footage that exceeds the revised baseline square footage shall be required to perform an environmental analysis based on the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. This technical memo and data shall serve as the 4t" Amendment to the Specific Plan and the information contained herein shall be used by City of Temecula staff in the review of future proposed projects. Any reference in the Specific Plan to 1,375,000 gross leasable area in Planning Area 2 shall be replaced with 1,409,754 gross leasable area. Any reference in the Specific Plan to 2,430,000 gross leasable area in the entire Specific Plan area shall be replaced with 2,464,754 gross leasable area. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2024-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR 23-0494)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7) was approved by the City Council on October 11, 1994 by the adoption of Resolution No. 94-101. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on January 28. 2003 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-3 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". B. On December 19, 2023, the City of Temecula processed Planning Application No. LR23-0494, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. On December 18, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. Pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020, the Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council approve Amendment No. 5 to the Specific Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan discusses the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not make any material changes to the Specific Plan that would impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. Policy 2.5 of the General Plan Economic Development Element is to promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high - quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan provides for opportunities for a broader selection of high -quality goods and services and the Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan details the amount of gross leasable area square feet available for the goods and services. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City's development code because the City will require that all new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines land uses, and establishes development standards, regulations and building criteria for each land use type. The Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan revises the amount of gross leasable area square feet within each planning area to reflect existing conditions. These square footages are based on projects that have either already been entitled or were entitled several years ago and, therefore, the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare will not be impacted by this technical change. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property is an existing regional mall and associated shopping centers all within the Specific Plan. The Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not propose any development or create any new land use designations. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. No development or development standards are proposed as apart of Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan. Future development within the Specific Plan area will adhere to the development standards of the Specific Plan which will ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommended approval of Specific Plan Amendment No. 4: The proposed Resolution, which approves the Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the proposed Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the proposed Resolution will establish a new baseline of gross leasable area square footage for the Specific Plan based on projects that are already constructed or entiledlvested and does not propose any new gross leasable area square footage. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE Temecula Regional Center SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR 23- 0494)" in substantially the same form as attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18.6 day of December, 2024. ATTEST: Matt Peters, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) ! " n k' (,/ Bob Hagel, Chair I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2024-25 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 181' day of December, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None tLKn Matt Peters, Secretary RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR 23-0494) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7) was approved by the City Council on October 11, 1994 by the adoption of Resolution No. 94-101. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on January 28. 2003 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) was approved on July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as originally approved and as amended by Amendments Nos. 1-3 shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "Specific Plan". B. On December 19, 2023, the City of Temecula processed Long Range Project No. LR23-0494, a Specific Plan Amendment in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Specific Plan provides standards and guidelines for development. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan is a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. D. On December 18, 2024 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan , the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2024-25 "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR 23-0494)" F. On February 11, 2025 the City Council considered the Amendment No 4 to the Specific Plan at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project prior to and at the public hearing. G. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE Temecula Regional Center SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 7) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR23-0494)" Resolution No. 2025- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. H. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section, 17.05.010, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed specific plan amendment is consistent with the general plan and development code. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan discusses the consistency between the Specific Plan and the General Plan. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not make any material changes to the Specific Plan that would impact the consistency findings set forth in the Specific Plan. The findings of consistency contained in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan are applicable and are incorporated herein by this reference. Policy 2.5 of the General Plan Economic Development Element is to promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high -quality goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including apparel, general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan provides for opportunities for a broader selection of high -quality goods and services and the Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan details the amount of gross leasable area square feet available for the goods and services. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan is also consistent with the City's development code because the City will require that all new construction comply with the City's design and building standards. B. The proposed specific plan amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City because the Specific Plan clearly defines land uses, and establishes development standards, regulations and building criteria for each land use type. The Fourth Amendment to the Specific Plan revises the amount ofgross leasable area square feet within each planning area to reflect existing conditions. These square footages are based on projects that have either already been entitled or were entitled several years ago and, therefore, the public interest, health, safety convenience or welfare will not be impacted by this technical change. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property is an existing regional mall and associated shopping centers all within the Specific Plan. The Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan does not propose any development or create any new land use designations. D. The proposed specific plan amendment shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. No development or development standards are proposed as apart of Amendment No. 4 to the Specific Plan. Future development within the Specific Plan area will adhere to the development standards of the Specific Plan which will ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. CEQA. This Resolution, which approves the Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the this Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the this Resolution will establish a new baseline of gross leasable area square footage for the Specific Plan based on projects that are already constructed or entiled/vested and does not propose any new gross leasable area square footage. Section 4. Approval of Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7). The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 7) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and directs the Community Development Director to incorporate Exhibit "A" as part of the Specific Plan. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 1 lth day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 1 lth day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Gty of �Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street - Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 - Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA -ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProces sina(& asrclkrec. com February 12, 2025 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. LR23-0494, a Fourth Specific Plan Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan for a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or at email scott.cooperkTemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Fourth Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (LR23-0494) Description of Project: Fourth Specific Plan Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan for a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. Project Location: South of Winchester Road, east of Ynez Road, north of Overland Drive, and west of Margarita Road Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside The City Council approved the above -described project on February 11, 2025, and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ❑ Categorical Exemption: (Section Number) ® Other: Section 15061 (b)(3) General Rule Exemption Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: The proposed Resolution, which approves an amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the proposed Resolution may have a significant effect on the environment. The adoption of the proposed Resolution will establish a new baseline of gross leasable area square footage for the Specific Plan based on projects that are already constructed or entiled/vested and does not propose any new gross leasable area square footage. Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner Phone Number: (951) 506-5137 Signature: Matt Peters Interim Director of Community Development Date: Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: LR23-0494 Applicant: City of Temecula Location: South of Winchester Road, east of Ynez Road, north of Overland Drive, and west of Margarita Road Proposal: Specific Plan Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan for a technical change to the document so the square footage in the Specific Plan reflects existing conditions/entitled projects. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review and recommends that a Notice of Exemption be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15061(b)(3)) as it can be seen with certainty that there will be no effect on the environment because the Specific Plan Amendment is not proposing any construction or additional square footage that is not already existing or entitled. PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: February 11, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM 2, •�•` Project Site F Ri,�G FtD ?'D DELO 0 0.25 0.5 Miles , , i OVERLANDDR Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 506- 5137. Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Approve Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THIS RESOLUTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a Member Agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and eighteen (18) cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, in 2002-2003, WRCOG member jurisdictions developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials due to new development in Western Riverside County could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial, and industrial development. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF participating jurisdiction, the city participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study," dated October 18, 2002 (the "2002 Nexus Study") prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG executive committee. Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code §§ 66000 et seq.), WRCOG prepared a new Nexus Study ("2016 Nexus Study") to update the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions update their fees by amending their applicable TUMF Ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF Network and the cost of construction. The City Council adopted and implemented an ordinance amending Chapter 15.08 to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF and adopt the 2016 Nexus Study. In 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018. The City adopted Ordinance 19-01 amending Chapter 15.08 and allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update" ("2024 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program. The Executive Committee set the fee levels as follows: (1) $12,380 per single family residential unit 1,800 square feet or less. (2) $13,927 per single family residential unit between 1,801 and 2,300 square feet. (3) $15,476 per single family residential unit between 2,301 and 2,700 square feet. (4) $19,344 per single family residential unit greater than 2,700 square feet. (5) $7,816 per multi -family residential unit. (6) $2.33 per square foot of an industrial project. (7) $7.72 per square foot of a retail commercial project. (8) $4.89 per square foot of a service commercial project. (9) $2.45 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office. Continuation of the TUMF program will mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System and allow the fees to be used to construct transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula's existing ordinance provides the legal basis for a revised TUMF schedule. The attached resolution will establish the Fee Schedule for TUMF as follows: From July 1, 2025 the fee schedule shall be as follows: (1) $12,380 per single family residential unit 1,800 square feet or less. (2) $13,927 per single family residential unit between 1,801 and 2,300 square feet. (3) $15,476 per single family residential unit between 2,301 and 2,700 square feet. (4) $19,344 per single family residential unit greater than 2,700 square feet. (5) $7,816 per multi -family residential unit. (6) $2.33 per square foot of an industrial project. (7) $7.72 per square foot of a retail commercial project. (8) $4.89 per square foot of a service commercial project. (9) $2.45 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A - TUMF Nexus Fee Study 2024 Update 2. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO.2025- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THIS RESOLUTION EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findings, The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare as follows: A. The city is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the county of Riverside and eighteen cities located in Western Riverside County. B. Acting in concert, the WRCOG member agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System") could be made up in part by a transportation uniform mitigation fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial and industrial development. C. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF participating jurisdiction, the city participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study," dated October 18, 2002 (the "2002 Nexus Study") prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG executive committee. D. The city also participated in the second major update of the TUMF network entitled the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study; 2009 Update" ("2009 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. Based on the 2002 and 2009 Nexus Studies, the City Council adopted and implemented ordinances amending Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and authorizing the city's participation in a TUMF program. E. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF participating jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG executive committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF program and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF program. The City Council adopted and implemented an ordinance amending Chapter 15.08 to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF and adopt the 2016 Nexus Study. F. In 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018. The City adopted an ordinance amending Chapter 15.08 and allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City. G. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update" ("2024 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program. H. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of ordinances amending Chapter 15.08, the city council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds and determines, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable levels of service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF program is essential. I. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied. J. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF. K. The City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the N new 2024 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development. L. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2024 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements. M. The city council finds and determines that the 2024 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional System. N. By notice duly given and published, the City Council set the time and place for a public hearing on the 2024 Nexus Study and the fees proposed thereunder and at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing, the City Council made the 2024 Nexus Study available to the public. O. At the time and place set for the hearing, the City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing. P. Section 15.08.040 (A) of the Temecula Municipal Code authorizes periodic review and adjustment to the applicable TUMF in accordance with any adjustments made by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Q. On, February 11, 2025 the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed TUMF at which time the City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the fees are proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the hearing. R. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Nexus Study. SECTION 2. Adoption of 2024 Nexus Study. The City Council hereby adopts the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update" (2024 Nexus Study) and its findings. The 2024 Nexus Study is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A." SECTION 3. TUMF Schedule. In accordance with Section 15.08.040 of the Temecula Municipal Code, there is hereby adopted the following fee schedule for the TUMF which supersedes the fee schedules set forth in prior resolutions of the City Council, effective as of the effective date of this Resolution as set forth in Section 5: 3 (1) $12,380 per single family residential unit 1,800 square feet or less. (2) $13,927 per single family residential unit between 1,801 and 2,300 square feet. (3) $15,476 per single family residential unit between 2,301 and 2,700 square feet. (4) $19,344 per single family residential unit greater than 2,700 square feet. (5) $7,816 per multi -family residential unit. (6) $2.33 per square foot of an industrial project. (7) $7.72 per square foot of a retail commercial project. (8) $4.89 per square foot of a service commercial project. (9) $2.45 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office. SECTION 4. CEOA Findings. The amendment to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Schedule as described in this Resolution is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. This Resolution does not approve the construction nor cause the construction of any specific transportation improvements within Riverside County. This Resolution will have no effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(d) and 15062, a Notice of Exemption will be prepared, executed and filed for the foregoing determination in the manner required by law, that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. SECTION 5. Judicial Review. In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within the time limits set forth in Government Code Section 66022. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective sixty (60) days following its adoption. SECTION 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 4 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 1 lth day of February, 2025. Brenden Kalfus, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the I I th day of February, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE NEXUS STUDY: 2024 UPDATE WRCOG , TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE NEXUS STUDY 2024 UPDATE FINAL REPORT Prepared for the Western Riverside Council of Governments In Cooperation with The City of Banning The City of Beaumont The City of Calimesa The City of Canyon Lake The City of Corona The City of Eastvale The City of Hemet The City of Jurupa Valley The City of Lake Elsinore The City of Menifee The City of Moreno Valley The City of Murrieta The City of Norco The City of Perris The City of Riverside The City of San Jacinto The City of Temecula The City of Wildomar The County of Riverside Eastern Municipal Water District March Joint Powers Authority Riverside County Superintendent of Schools Riverside Transit Agency Western Water Prepared by GHD As adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee, September 9, 2024 Western Riverside Council of Governments TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................i LISTOF TABLES............................................................................................................................. ii ES.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ iii ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study ........................................................iii ES.2 Future Growth............................................................................................................ vi ES.3 Need for the TUMF..................................................................................................... A ES.4 The TUMF Network....................................................................................................viii ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis...................................................................................................x ES.6 Fair -Share Fee Calculation........................................................................................x ES.7 Conclusions................................................................................................................ A 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY ................................................ 1 1.1 Background.............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process....................................................................................... 5 2.3.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List............................................................... 7 2.3.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs ....................................................... 8 2.3.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component............................................................ 9 2.3.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments..........................................10 2.3.5. Computing the Fee for Non -Residential Developments..................................10 2.0 FUTURE GROWTH.........................................................................................................13 2.1 Recent Historical Trend...........................................................................................13 2.2 Available Demographic Data...............................................................................13 2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis ...........................14 3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF....................................................................................................21 3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels........................................................................21 3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels................................................................................24 3.3 The TUMF Concept..................................................................................................25 4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK.....................................................................................................27 4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network......................................................27 4.2 Backbone Network and Secondary Network.......................................................30 4.3 Future Roadway Transportation Needs.................................................................33 4.4 Public Transportation Component of the TUMF System.......................................37 4.5 Existing Obligated Funding.....................................................................................40 4.6 Unfunded Existing Improvement Needs................................................................40 4.7 Maximum TUMF Eligible Cost..................................................................................42 4.8 TUMF Network Evaluation.......................................................................................53 5.0 TUMF NEXUS ANALYSIS.................................................................................................55 5.1 Future Development and the Need for Improvements.......................................55 5.2 Application of Fee to System Components..........................................................56 5.3 Application of Fee to Residential and Non -Residential Developments .............59 6.0 FAIR -SHARE FEE CALCULATION...................................................................................60 6.1 Residential Fees.......................................................................................................60 6.2 Non -Residential Fees...............................................................................................62 7.0 CONCLUSIONS.............................................................................................................64 8.0 APPENDICES.................................................................................................................65 WRCOG I Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 LIST OF TABLES Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County ............xii Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County................14 Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to2045).............................................................................................................................17 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison).......................................................................19 Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing to 2045 No-Build)...........................................................................................................................22 Table 4.1 - Unit Costs for Arterial Highway and Street Construction...................................35 Table 4.2 - Forecasted Daily Traffic in Western Riverside County.......................................36 Table 4.3 - Unit Costs for Transit Capital Expenditures..........................................................39 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates..............................................................................45 Table 4.5 - TUMF Transit Cost Estimates.................................................................................53 Table 4.6 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build Scenarios to 2045 TUMF Build Scenario)..........................................................54 Table 5.1 - 2045 No -Build Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone...............................57 Table 5.2 - 2045 No -Build Percent Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone ................57 Table 5.3 - Backbone -Secondary Network Share Calculation...........................................58 Table 5.4 - Daily VMT Growth by Trip Purpose for Western Riverside County (2018 - 2045) 59 Table 6.1 - Fee Calculation for Residential Share.................................................................61 Table 6.2 - Single -Family Residential Fee Adjustments by Unit Size....................................62 Table 6.3 - Fee Calculation for Non -Residential Share........................................................63 Table 7.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County..............64 LIST OF FIGURES Figure ES.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process.................................v Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045)......................................................................................................................vii Figure ES.3 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials-TUMF Network Improvements ... ix Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process ................................. 6 Figure 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ..............15 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ............ 16 Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County ........... 16 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to2045).............................................................................................................................18 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison).......................................................................20 Figure 4.1 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County ..... 29 Figure 4.2 - The Backbone Network of Highways and Arterials for Western Riverside County..............................................................................................................................31 Figure 4.3 - Western Riverside County Area Planning Districts (TUMF Zones) .....................32 Figure 4.4 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials-TUMF Network Improvements ...44 WRCOG 11 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ES.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 Introduction and Purpose of the Nexus Study Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000's, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure. Although the economic recession of the late 2000's, and the associated crises in the mortgage and housing industries, slowed this rate of growth, the regional economy has recovered and the projected rate of development in Western Riverside County remains high. Similarly, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel demand in the region has also passed, with travel demands, especially for the highway network, surpassing pre -pandemic levels. Continued high growth in households and jobs in Western Riverside County could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. In February 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the Building Industry Association (BIA) met to discuss the concept of a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for southwest Riverside County. In August 2000, the concept was expanded to include the entire WRCOG sub- region. Continued high growth in households and jobs in Western Riverside County could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future new development will contribute toward addressing its indirect cumulative traffic impacts on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements such as new arterial highway lanes, reconfigured freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations and new regional express bus services that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their "fair share" toward sustaining the regional transportation system. WRCOG iii Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 This TUMF Draft Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act) which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. The results of the first review of the Program were documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009. A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted following the adoption of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016. The WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update Report was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017. On September 3, 2020, SCAG adopted Connect SoCal; The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments (2020 RTP/SCS). The adoption of the 2020 RTP/SCS confirmed new growth forecasts for the region that provide a foundational element for updating the TUMF program and the associated nexus determination prompting WRCOG to initiate the current program update. These forecasts are also integrated into the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM) used to forecast the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development on the arterial highway network in Western Riverside County. The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is illustrated in Figure ES.1. Each technical step is denoted with a number on the flow chart with the numbers correlating to the detailed description of each step provided in Section 1.3 of the Nexus Study Report. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of RivCoM, steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in the Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step. This version of the WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study Report documents the results of the fourth comprehensive review of the TUMF Program. This version of the document also incorporates revisions in response to comments received during the formal review of the earlier Draft TUMF Nexus Study 2024 Update. The findings of this report were ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on September 9, 2024. WRCOG iv Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure ES.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process TUMF Road Project List SCAG Data on 2018 Housing & Employment RivCoM 22 Existing Road Network RivCoM 2018 Baseline Model Run TUMF LOS Target Existing Capacity Deficiencies Capacity Deficiencies Attributable to New Development SCAG Forecast for 2045 Housing & Employment RivCoM 2045 No -Build Model Run Future Capacity Deficiencies v TUMF Selection Criteria TUMF Road Project Cost Estimates TUMF Design Updated TUMF Standards by Unit Costs for ROW Facility Type & Construction Cost per Mile by TUMF Project Type (Table 4.1) TUMF Transit Component RTA Transit Ridership 2023 Actual Average SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model Weekday Daily Ridership 2045 Forecast Average I TWeekday Daily Ridership TUMF Road %Attributed J Pect List roj to New 7 Development Estimated Costs Transit Costs of TUMF Projects Attributable to New Development Road Project Costs Attributable to New Development Funds Available Project Costs to from Other (non- be Covered to TUMF) Sources New Development RivCoM 5 Trip Purposes HBW, HBS, HBO WBO, OBO Residential Fee Calculation (%ofvMT (%ofvMT (Table 6.1 & Appendix K) Growth) Growth) SCAG Forecast ITE Growth in SFD, MFD Trip -Gen Rates (Table 2.3) (11th Edition) Growth in Trips for SFD & MFD Share of Project Share of Project Costs Attributable Costs Attributable to Retail Service, to SFD & MFD Industrial, & Public Sectors Fee per DU Fee per SF TUMF Nexus Study and Schedule of Fees Adjustments per Fee Calculation Handbook (Applicable to some project types) -F: Adjusted Fee per Unit RTA Transit Project List TUMF Transit Updated Transit Project List Unit Cost (Table 4.3) r Cost Estimate for Transit Improvements Non -Residential Fee Calculation ITE Trip -Gen Rates by (Table 6.2 & Appendix L) Individual Land Use Code (11th edition) Riverside & SB (1990) SCAG Study (2001) Average Trip -Gen ITE Percent OCTAStudy (2001) Rates by Sector (Table L-4) Pass -By Trips (Table L-4) Riverside County General Plan (2015) Average SCAG Forecast Growth in EmployeesriGen Assumed Ratio of 7Adjusted Rates by by SectorEmployeeslTSF ector (Table L-3) (Tables 2.3 & L-2) (Table L-1) Growth in TSF for Retail, Service, Industrial, & Public Sectors 7 Growth in Trips for Retail, Service, Industrial, & Public Sectors KEY ® Reference to Description in Text Other Inputs Computations Items for RivCoM Adoption WRCOG v Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ES.2 Future Growth In preparation for the 2020 RTP/SCS, SCAG undertook robust stakeholder engagement, including participation by WRCOG, Riverside County and the various cities in Western Riverside County, to develop regional demographic forecasts. Using input from regional stakeholders regarding anticipated patterns and rates of development, SCAG compiled and disseminated the forecasts that were ultimately adopted in 2020. The SCAG forecasts adopted for the 2020 RTP/SCS were subsequently used as the basis for RivCoM and are used as the basis for this TUMF Nexus Study Update. A major distinction between data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data used for this 2024 Update is the change in the base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2040 to 2045. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation. The population of Western Riverside County is projected to increase by 33% in the period between 2018 and 2045. During the same period, employment in Western Riverside County is anticipated to grow by 48%. Figure ES.2 illustrates the forecast growth in population, household and employment for Western Riverside County. ES.3 Need for the TUMF The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater RivCoM model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the TUMF study area included total vehicle miles of travel (VMT), total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS Q. As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure, particularly the arterial roadways, with the peak period VMT on the TUMF Network estimated to increase by 38% between 2018 and 2045. By 2045, 37% of the total VMT on the TUMF Network is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing peak period LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on the TUMF Network will increase over 5.0% per year. The need to improve these roadways and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the travel demand. WRCOG A Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure ES.2 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) 3=," z,',DD,aOO z,M,= 1--'00,00 IX Say Household Type Single -Family ■ MultrFamily Employment Sectors ❑ I ndustrial Service ❑ Retail ❑ Government/Public Sector As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows because of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow. Weekday system ridership for RTA bus transit services is approximately 16,575 riders per day in Western Riverside County in 2023. By 2045, bus transit services are forecast to serve approximately 57,282 riders per weekday. This represents an average increase of 1,850 weekday riders each year. Based on this rate of ridership growth, weekday ridership is estimated to increase by 40,707 riders per weekday between 2018 and 2045. The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute equally to paying the cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these longer -distance trips between communities. Thus, the fee should be used to improve transportation facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (primarily arterial roadways) as well as the infrastructure for public transportation. The fee should be assessed proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each use on the transportation system. WRCOG vii Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ESA The TUMF Network The Regional System of Highways and Arterials (also referred to as the TUMF Network) is the system of roadways that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied these guidelines were initially identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where several guidelines were observed. Representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions reviewed this framework in the context of current local transportation plans to define the TUMF Network, which was subsequently endorsed by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee. The TUMF Network was reviewed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to ensure facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process resulted in the removal of various facilities from the TUMF Network, as well as various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network. Figure ES.3 illustrates the TUMF improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials. The total cost of improving the TUMF system is $5.28 billion. Accounting for obligated funds and unfunded existing needs, the estimated maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program is $4.24 billion. The maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program includes approximately $3.87 billion in eligible arterial highway and street related improvements and $154.8 million in eligible transit related improvements. An additional $53.9 million is also eligible as part of the TUMF Program to mitigate the impact of eligible TUMF related arterial highway and street projects on critical native species and wildlife habitat, while $161.2 million is provided to cover the costs incurred by WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program. WRCOG viii Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 JURUPA VALLEY Figure ES.3 - Regional System of Highways and Arterials - TUMF Network Improvements ley Grand Terrace --- 9� i g7 C7Ni o kliIIs F- NORCO L�� � � - 2 ore Ic Alessandro LL 2nd Hidden ]FK + +� Gm pilroad Val}eY RIVERSIDE �� � Van Buren • `LO � �° C�R�NA� Ffar�eY no,. mo t\ $,77 ntd��t a Rami a • Mid -County ♦ (Placentia) Pr. f e �. No 474 rris Ellis Tustin t Ethanac i �6W ft NIC �•r_ I1pL5 f-+.ft¢S20ft v CANYON LAKE Irvine 7 a r a n �� LAKE caMot' 9 Lake est \Road ELSINORE Rancho Santa -f -L- Lakeland Villa . Margarita o: r, Santa Ana ► I' ca gUy Mountains � � a a° WILDOMAR 0 / I ar --` C o�� Clinton 1 00 f ''7dr m Legend o` i N a Ultimate Lanes • Interchange ^%,,v 2 0 Bridge ,ss,v 4 0 Railroad Crossing ^v 5 r TUMF Zone 8 = Cities r - ] County Boundaries • 10 1 ., rloha.,to ' south tQ rr--r ---- -—. r -A �• i i� .�. San Mateo a E �...�Canyon Esri, Santa Margarita-- J n — CALIMLSA MORENO VALLEY Yucaipa County The Badlands ss� 1 1 L-� Laket w M�i'h n s r r m y Newport It N r �m` u � I � Scott y ^�1 v 1 Benton TA Murrit. Hot .Q T C HE r" Cr�k 1 � 1 � ' BANNING Moronc�❑ ' ' } [p G Reservation •••1 �—= S n Gorg❑ t.aumo t Wilson k• } •' Ram rl..n 1st Sun L+ Lnd. 10 $YPss. pa S s v Pa ; + `PA'LM 13EAUMONT u � r r I irF� 4 • • - �• ` L -WLWt San • �,.�----�� { �t Jacint� State ------v -Pdrk A • To 7� 5o6a6a r".V o Reservation+ -79 E 1 } N,^3t5R-74 fdyllwilfi•. (Florida) Rouse Hemet�sanr- Jacinto M� P.S. Census, County of Riverside, California State hanga nation I} -% �!. 0 'A r' I Thoma Mounta Western Rivenide Cound I of Cove rnments arks, Esri,omTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METIfNASA, ,_USGS, Yyreau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS An Mau ES.5 TUMF Nexus Analysis There is a reasonable relationship between the future growth and the need for improvements to the TUMF system. These factors include: ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development. ➢ Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County. ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. ➢ Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. The split of fee revenues between the backbone and secondary highway networks is related to the proportion of highway vehicle travel that is relatively local (between adjacent communities) and longer distance (between more distant communities but still within Western Riverside County). To estimate a rational fee split between the respective networks, the future travel forecast estimates were aggregated to a matrix of peak period trips between zones. The overall result is that 51.1 % of the regional travel is attributable to the backbone network and 48.9% is assigned to the secondary network. In order to establish the approximate proportionality of the future traffic impacts associated with new residential development and new non-residential development, peak period growth in VMT between 2018 and 2045 was derived from RivCoM and aggregated by trip purpose. It was concluded that home -based person trips represent 77.7% of the total future person trips, and the non -home -based person trips represent 22.3% of the total future person trips. ES.6 Fair -Share Fee Calculation The balance of the unfunded TUMF system improvement needs is $4.24 billion which is the maximum value attributable to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development in the WRCOG region and will be captured through the TUMF Program. By levying the uniform fee directly on future new developments (and indirectly on new residents and new employees to Western Riverside County), these transportation system users are assigned their "fair share" of the WRCOG x Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 costs to address the cumulative impacts of additional traffic they will generate on the regional transportation system. Of the $4.24 billion in unfunded future improvement needs, 77.7% ($3.30 billion) will be assigned to future new residential development and 22.3% ($946.5 million) will be assigned to future new non-residential development. ES.7 Conclusions Based on the results of the Nexus Study evaluation, it can be demonstrated that there is reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the proposed TUMF Program. Factors that reflect this reasonable relationship include: ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing as a result of future new development. ➢ Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways; ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County; ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative impacts of new development; ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program; ➢ Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automotive travel. The Nexus Study evaluation has established a proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development based on the impacts of existing development and the availability of obligated funding through traditional sources. The fair share fee allocable to future new residential and non-residential development in Western Riverside County is summarized for differing use types in Table ES.1. WRCOG xi Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table ES.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County Land Use Type Units Development Change Fee Per Unit Total Revenue ($ million) Single -Family Residential DU 167,491 $15,476 $2,592.0 Multi -Family Residential DU 90,335 $7,816 $706.1 Industrial SF GFA 61,489,565 $2.33 $143.1 Retail SF GFA 6,557,500 $11.21 $73.5 Service SF GFA 66,735,957 $9.76 $651.1 Government/Public SF GFA 3,420,665 $23.07 $78.9 MAXIMUM TUMF VALUE $2,961.0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update xii Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF THE NEXUS STUDY 1.1 Background Western Riverside County includes 18 incorporated cities and the unincorporated county covering an area of approximately 2,100 square miles. Through the mid 2000's, this portion of Riverside County was growing at a pace exceeding the capacity of existing financial resources to meet increasing demand for transportation infrastructure. Although the economic recession of the late 2000's, and the associated crises in the mortgage and housing industries, slowed this rate of growth, the regional economy has recovered and the projected rate of development in Western Riverside County remains high. Similarly, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel demand in the region has also passed, with travel demands, especially for the highway network, surpassing pre -pandemic levels. Continued high growth in households and jobs in Western Riverside County could significantly increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial roadways of regional significance, since traditional sources of transportation funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the needed improvements. Development exactions only provide improvements near the development site, and the broad -based county -level funding sources (i.e., Riverside County's half -cent sales tax known as Measure A) designate only a small portion of their revenues for arterial roadway improvements. In anticipation of the continued future growth projected in Riverside County, several county -wide planning processes were initiated in 1999. These planning processes include the Riverside County General Plan Update, the Community Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process (CETAP) and the Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Related to these planning processes is the need to fund the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development. Regional arterial highways in Western Riverside County are forecast to carry significant traffic volumes by 2045. While some localized fee programs exist to mitigate the local impacts of new development on the transportation system in specific areas, and while these programs are effective locally, they are insufficient in their ability to meet the regional demand for transportation infrastructure. Former Riverside County Supervisor Buster recognized the need to establish a comprehensive funding source to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development on regional arterial highways. The need to establish a comprehensive funding source for arterial highway improvements has evolved into the development of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) for Western Riverside County. In February 1999, the cities of Temecula, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore, the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) and the Building Industry Association (BIA) met to discuss the WRCOG I Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 concept of a TUMF. The intent of this effort was to have the southwest area of Western Riverside County act as a demonstration for the development of policies and a process for a regional TUMF Program before applying the concept countywide. From February 1999 to September 2000, the Southwest Area Transportation Infrastructure System Funding Year 2020 (SATISFY 2020) Program progressed with policy development, the identification of transportation improvements, traffic modeling, cost estimates, fee scenarios and a draft Implementation Agreement. In May 2000, Riverside County Supervisor Tavaglione initiated discussions in the northwest area of Western Riverside County to determine the level of interest in developing a TUMF for that area of the county. Interest in the development of a northwest area fee program was high. In August 2000, the WRCOG Executive Committee took action to build upon the work completed in the southwest area for the SATISFY 2020 program and to develop a single consolidated mitigation fee program for all of Western Riverside County. This action was predicated on the desire to establish a single uniform mitigation fee program to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system, rather than multiple discrete and disparate fee programs with varying policies, fees and improvement projects. A TUMF Policy Committee comprising regional elected officials was formed to recommend and set policies for staff to develop the TUMF Program and provide overall guidance to all other staff committees. While the TUMF cannot fund all necessary transportation system improvements, it is intended to address a current transportation funding shortfall by establishing a new revenue source that ensures future new development will contribute toward addressing its indirect cumulative traffic impacts on regional transportation infrastructure. Funding accumulated through the TUMF Program will be used to construct transportation improvements such as new arterial highway lanes, reconfigured freeway interchanges, railroad grade separations and new regional express bus services that will be needed to accommodate future travel demand in Western Riverside County. By levying a fee on new developments in the region, local agencies will be establishing a mechanism by which developers and in turn new county residents and employees will effectively contribute their "fair share" toward sustaining the regional transportation system. This TUMF Nexus Study is intended to satisfy the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 5 Section 66000-66008 Fees for Development Projects (also known as California Assembly Bill 1600 (AB 1600) or the Mitigation Fee Act), which governs imposing development impact fees in California. The Mitigation Fee Act requires that all local agencies in California, including cities, counties, and special districts follow two basic rules when instituting impact fees. These rules are as follows: 1) Establish a nexus or reasonable relationship between the development impact fee's use and the type of project for which the fee is required. 2) The fee must not exceed the project's proportional "fair share" of the proposed improvement and cannot be used to correct current problems or to make improvements for existing development. WRCOG 2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 1.2 TUMF Nexus Study History The TUMF Program is implemented through the auspices of WRCOG. As the council of governments for Western Riverside County, WRCOG provides a forum for representatives from 18 cities, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Eastern Municipal Water District, Western Water, the Riverside County Superintendent of Schools, the March Joint Powers Authority and the Riverside Transit Agency to collaborate on issues that affect the entire subregion, such as air quality, solid waste, transportation and the environment. WRCOG strives to "respect local control, provide regional perspective, and make a difference" to elevate the quality of life throughout the subregion. A current list of the standing WRCOG committees and committee membership that oversee the TUMF program is included in Appendix A. The initial WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study was completed in October 2002 and adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in November 2002. Its purpose was to establish the nexus or reasonable relationship between new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the proposed development impact fee that would be used to improve regional transportation facilities. It also identified the proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development. Consistent with the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act, the WRCOG Executive Committee has established that the TUMF Nexus Study will be subject of a comprehensive review of the underlying program assumptions at least every five years to confirm the Nexus. Acknowledging the unprecedented and unique nature of the TUMF Program, the Executive Committee determined that the first comprehensive review of the Program should be initiated within two years of initial adoption of the Program primarily to validate the findings and recommendations of the study and to correct any program oversights. The results of the first review of the Program were documented in the TUMF Nexus Study 2005 Update adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on February 6, 2006. A second comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2008 and 2009 in part to address the impacts of the economic recession on the rate of development within the region and on transportation project costs. The findings of the 2009 review of the program were adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on October 5, 2009. A third comprehensive review of the TUMF Program was conducted in 2014 and 2015 leading to a Draft Nexus Study document being distributed for review in August 2015. The WRCOG Executive Committee subsequently considered comments related to the Draft Nexus Study 2015 Update at the meeting held on September 14, 2015, where it was resolved to "delay finalizing the Nexus Study for the TUMF Program Update until the 2016 Southern California Association of Governments' 2016 Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy growth forecast is available for inclusion in the Nexus Study". The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) adopted the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 RTP/SCS) on April 7, 2016, enabling WRCOG staff to proceed with finalizing the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. The WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update Report was ultimately adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 10, 2017. WRCOG 3 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 On September 3, 2020, SCAG adopted Connect SoCal; The 2020-2045 Regional onal Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments (2020 RTP/SCS). As stated in the plan document "Connect SoCal embodies a collective vision for the region's future, through the horizon year of 2045. It is developed with input from a wide range of constituents and stakeholders within the Counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and Ventura, including public agencies, community organizations, elected officials, tribal governments, the business community and the public. Connect SoCal is an important planning document for the region, allowing public agencies who implement transportation projects to do so in a coordinated manner, while qualifying for federal and state funding." The adoption of the 2020 RTP/SCS confirmed new growth forecasts for the region that were used as the basis to develop the Connect SoCal plan. These forecasts also provide a foundational element for updating the TUMF program and the associated nexus determination prompting WRCOG to initiate the current program update. The 2020 RTP/SCS growth forecasts are used directly in the fee calculation as the basis for determining the anticipated growth in households and employment in the region through the program horizon year of 2045. These forecasts are also integrated into the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM) used to forecast the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development on the arterial highway network in Western Riverside County. Completed in 2021 to succeed the Riverside County Traffic Analysis Model (RIVTAM), RivCoM provides a valuable tool for supporting a variety of transportation planning activities in Riverside County, including the update of the TUMF Nexus Study. RivCoM was developed under the leadership of WRCOG in conjunction with regional partners with the intent to provide jurisdictions in Riverside County with a traffic forecasting tool that, while consistent with the SCAG regional travel demand model, provides a more appropriate level of detail to support transportation planning at the County or City level. RivCoM is a critical tool for quantifying the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development as part of the TUMF Nexus Study Update. Utilizing the 2020 RTP/SCS growth forecasts, RivCoM is used to quantify changes in travel demand and traffic conditions on the regional highway network, with a specific focus on the TUMF Network. RivCoM outputs are used to analyze project eligibility and quantify the fair share of traffic growth that is attributable to new development as inputs to determining the fee. The adoption of the Connect SoCal plan and the availability of RivCoM to serve as a critical tool for quantifying network impacts for the TUMF Nexus Study Update were key factors driving the schedule for this update of the fee. To ensure new development continues to contribute a fair share of the cost to mitigate its cumulative regional transportation impacts in the period between the comprehensive review of program assumptions completed at least every five years, the WRCOG Executive Committee has also established that the TUMF Schedule of Fees will be reviewed annually, and adjusted, as needed, on July 1 st to reflect current costs. The revised schedule of fees will typically be recalculated in February of each year based WRCOG 4 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 on the percentage increase or decrease in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index (CCI) for the twelve (12) month period from January of the prior year to January of the current year, and the percentage increase or decrease in the National Association of Realtors (NAR) Median Sales Price of Existing Single Family Homes in the Riverside/San Bernardino Metropolitan Statistical Area for the twelve (12) month period from the 3rd Quarter of the second year prior to the 3rd Quarter of the prior year (to coincide with the publication of the most recently updated index). If approved by the Executive Committee, the resultant percentage change for each of the indices will be applied to the unit cost assumptions for roadway and bus transit costs, and land acquisition costs, respectively, to reflect the combined effects of changes in eligible project costs on the resultant per unit fee for each defined land use category. The most recent annual cost adjustment to the TUMF Schedule of Fees was adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee on July 12, 2021. 1.3 TUMF Nexus Study Process In coordination with WRCOG, city and county representatives and other interested parties have reviewed the underlying assumptions of the Nexus Study as part of this comprehensive program review. In particular, the most recent socioeconomic forecasts developed by SCAG as the basis for the 2020 RTP/SCS were incorporated. This use of the most recent SCAG forecasts resulted in a shift of the program base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as a shift in the program horizon year from 2040 to 2045. Furthermore, the TUMF Network was re-examined in detail based on travel demand forecasts derived from the most recent version of the Riverside County Model (RivCoM) to more accurately reflect future project needs to address the cumulative regional impacts of new development in Western Riverside County as well as eliminating those projects having been completed prior to the commencement of the Nexus review in 2021. The subsequent chapters of this Nexus Study document describe the various assumptions, data inputs and analysis leading to the determination of each major variable in the TUMF calculation, and ultimately leading to the determination of the TUMF Schedule of Fees that indicates the maximum "fair share" fee for each of the various use types defined in the TUMF program. The overall process for establishing the TUMF nexus is summarized in this section, including the flow chart in Figure 1.1 that illustrates the various technical steps in this fee calculation process. Each technical step that was followed to determine the TUMF Schedule of Fees and establish the program nexus is summarized below, with the numbers denoted on the flow chart correlating to the steps described. The flow chart also incorporates color coding of the steps to indicate those steps that involved the application of RivCoM, steps that utilized other input data, steps that are computations of various inputs, and steps that required specific actions of the various WRCOG committees to confirm major variables. Where appropriate, the flow chart also includes specific cross references to the sections or tables included in this Nexus Study document that correlate to the particular step. WRCOG 5 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure 1.1 - Flowchart of Key Steps in the TUMF Nexus Study Process TUMF Road Project List SCAG Data on 2018 Housing & Employment RivCoM 22 Existing Road Network RivCoM 2018 Baseline Model Run TUMF LOS Target Existing Capacity Deficiencies Capacity Deficiencies Attributable to New Development SCAG Forecast for 2045 Housing & Employment RivCoM 2045 No -Build Model Run Future Capacity Deficiencies v TUMF Selection Criteria TUMF Road Project Cost Estimates TUMF Design Updated TUMF Standards by Unit Costs for ROW Facility Type & Construction Cost per Mile by TUMF Project Type (Table 4.1) TUMF Transit Component RTA Transit Ridership 2023 Actual Average SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model Weekday Daily Ridership 2045 Forecast Average I TWeekday Daily Ridership TUMF Road %Attributed J Pect List roj to New 7 Development Estimated Costs Transit Costs of TUMF Projects Attributable to New Development Road Project Costs Attributable to New Development Funds Available Project Costs to from Other (non- be Covered to TUMF) Sources New Development RivCoM 5 Trip Purposes HBW, HBS, HBO WBO, OBO Residential Fee Calculation (%ofvMT (%ofvMT (Table 6.1 & Appendix K) Growth) Growth) SCAG Forecast ITE Growth in SFD, MFD Trip -Gen Rates (Table 2.3) (11th Edition) Growth in Trips for SFD & MFD Share of Project Share of Project Costs Attributable Costs Attributable to Retail Service, to SFD & MFD Industrial, & Public Sectors Fee per DU Fee per SF TUMF Nexus Study and Schedule of Fees Adjustments per Fee Calculation Handbook (Applicable to some project types) -F: Adjusted Fee per Unit RTA Transit Project List TUMF Transit Updated Transit Project List Unit Cost (Table 4.3) r Cost Estimate for Transit Improvements Non -Residential Fee Calculation ITE Trip -Gen Rates by (Table 6.2 & Appendix L) Individual Land Use Code (11th edition) Riverside & SB (1990) SCAG Study (2001) Average Trip -Gen ITE Percent OCTAStudy (2001) Rates by Sector (Table L-4) Pass -By Trips (Table L-4) Riverside County General Plan (2015) Average SCAG Forecast Growth in EmployeesriGen Assumed Ratio of 7Adjusted Rates by by SectorEmployeeslTSF ector (Table L-3) (Tables 2.3 & L-2) (Table L-1) Growth in TSF for Retail, Service, Industrial, & Public Sectors 7 Growth in Trips for Retail, Service, Industrial, & Public Sectors KEY ® Reference to Description in Text Other Inputs Computations Items for RivCoM Adoption WRCOG 6 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 2.3.1. Establish the TUMF Network Project List The roadway network in Western Riverside County must be evaluated to determine how new development activity will impact the performance of the network, and how the resultant traffic impacts can be mitigated by completing various roadway improvements. The following steps integrate the latest SCAG socio-economic forecasts into RivCoM as the basis for determining future roadway deficiencies and identifying the list of eligible improvements to address these future deficiencies. The rational and methodology for accomplishing these steps is further explained in Chapters 2 and 3 of this report, with the resultant TUMF Network described in Chapter 4. 1) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2018 as its base year. This adopted dataset was integrated into RivCoM providing a critical analytic tool to support the Nexus Study Update. 2) The RivCoM model' has datasets available that represent the capacity of the different facilities in the road network for several different study years. For this nexus update, the RivCoM 2018 base network that was developed following the adoption of the SCAG 2020 RTP was selected as the one most closely resembling current conditions. This network was subsequently reviewed and updated, including a detailed review by WRCOG staff and participating jurisdictions, to identify projects that were completed on the arterial network in the period between 2016 and December 2021. The arterial network was then recoded to reflect the changes to the TUMF Network to create a 2021 Existing Network as the base network for analysis. A second version of the base network was also developed adding only those facilities that had been identified on the 2016 TUMF network that did not currently exist and therefore were not represented by a link(s) in RivCoM. The Supplemental 2021 Existing Network was utilized as the basis for assessing only those projects that did not currently exist on the TUMF Network. 3) RivCoM was run using the 2018 socio-economic data (SED) and the 2021 Existing Networks to produce the baseline volumes on the roads in the TUMF Network. 4) The baseline volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio was then determined. The target LOS for TUMF facilities is "D", meaning that facilities with LOS "E" or "F", i.e. those with a V/C ratio of 0.9 or higher, are deemed to have inadequate capacity. The result of this step is a list of roads that have existing capacity deficiencies. 1 The macro -level traffic forecasting was conducted using the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RivCoM) RivCoM is consistent of SCAG's six -county model with additional detail (traffic analysis zones and local roads) added within Riverside County. It was developed for use in traffic studies in Riverside County as a replacement for the Riverside County Transportation and Analysis Model (RivTAM) integrating an updated modeling platform to improve run time and reliability, as well as a more focused model area, more detailed network and zone structure, and prost processors to satisfy more recent legislative requirements. RivCoM has both the geographic scope needed to analyze all TUMF facilities and conformity with regional planning assumptions. There is a memorandum of understanding among the jurisdictions of Riverside County that encourages the use of the RivCoM model for use in regional traffic studies. WRCOG 7 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 5) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS was developed using housing and employment data for 2045 as its forecast horizon year. This adopted dataset was also used as the future base year for the TUMF update calculation. 6) RivCoM was run using the 2021 Existing Networks with the land use assumptions for 2045. These "Future No -Build" scenarios was used to determine where deficiencies would occur in the roadway system if development occurred as expected but no roadway improvements were implemented. 7) Comparing the existing capacity deficiencies with the future deficiencies showed where new deficiencies would occur that are entirely attributable to growth in households and employment. Comparing the existing and future traffic volume to capacity ratio on the roads that are currently deficient shows the portion of the future deficiency that is attributable to growth. 8) It is generally acknowledged that the TUMF program cannot and should not attempt to fund every roadway improvement needed in Western Riverside County. WRCOG has adopted a set of selection criteria that was used to choose which roadway improvements would be eligible for TUMF funding. 9) The selection criteria were applied to the forecast deficiencies to identify projects for the TUMF Project List. The project list was subsequently reviewed to confirm the eligibility of proposed projects, including projects previously included in the TUMF program, as well as additional projects requested for inclusion as part of the current update. The project list was then subsequently updated to reflect those projects considered eligible for TUMF funding as part of the 2024 Nexus Study Update. 2.3.2. Determine the TUMF Network Project Costs The estimated costs of proposed improvements on the TUMF Network are calculated based on the prices of construction materials, labor and land values for the various eligible project types included as part of the TUMF program. The approach and outcomes of the following steps is described in Chapter 4 of this report. 10) The TUMF program has design standards covering the road project components that are eligible for TUMF funding. This ensures that projects in jurisdictions with different design standards are treated equally2. 1 1) Current cost values for labor and materials such as cement, asphalt, reinforcing steel, etc., as derived from Caltrans cost database, RCTC and other sources, were tabulated and updated to December 2023. Additionally, the ROW cost components per square foot for various land use types were also updated based on current property valuations in Riverside County as researched by Overland, Pacific and Cutler. z A jurisdiction may choose to design to a higher standard, but if it does so, TUMF will only fund up to the equivalent of what costs would have been had the TUMF design standards been followed. WRCOG 8 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 12) The cost values for the contributing labor, materials and land components were applied to estimated quantities of these components for the various roadway project types that are eligible under TUMF to generate aggregate unit cost values for each project type (road costs per lane -mile, typical costs per arterial - freeway interchange, bridge costs per linear foot, etc.). 13) The unit costs from the previous step were then applied to the project list to estimate the costs of the improvements on the TUMF project list. 14) The percentage of each project that was attributable to new development was then applied to the costs of TUMF road projects to find the total road project cost that is attributable to new development. 2.3.3. Determine the TUMF Transit Component A portion of the TUMF funding is made available for transit services that provide an alternative to car travel for medium -to -long distance intra-regional trips. The eligible transit projects and their associated costs are determined using the following steps, with additional explanation provided in Chapter 4 of this report. 15) Actual average weekday daily ridership for Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) transit bus services was tabulated for 2023. 16) Forecast average weekday daily ridership for RTA bus transit services was retrieved from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model for horizon year 2045. 17) The growth in ridership between 2023 and 2045 was compared to determine the portion of 2045 average weekday daily ridership that is attributable to existing passengers and the portion attributable to new growth. 18) A proposed transit project list was provided by RTA staff and was reviewed to confirm the validity of the project list to establish a final recommended transit project list to be included as part of the program. The result was the TUMF Transit Project List. 19) RTA provided information on current costs for the listed transit infrastructure. 20) The cost information was then used to determine the cost of the items on the TUMF Transit Project List. 21) The percent attribution from Step 17 was applied to the project cost estimates from the previous step to determine the cost of transit improvements that are attributable to new development. 22) The costs for road and transit projects that are attributable to new development are then combined along with information on other (non-TUMF) funds to determine the total cost for TUMF projects that is to be cover by new development through the imposition of the fees. The available alternate funding sources were reviewed as part of the Nexus update, specifically including the completion of a detailed review of available federal, state and local funding sources administered by RCTC. WRCOG 9 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 2.3.4. Computing the Fee for Residential Developments Having determined the total project costs to be covered by new development under the TUMF program, it is necessary to divide these costs among different types of developments roughly in proportion to their expected traffic impacts. The following steps describes the process for determining the proportion attributable to new residential development. The approach for accomplishing these steps along with the findings of this analysis are described in detail in Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report. 23) California legislation encourages the use of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the primary indicator of traffic impacts because it combines the number of vehicle trips and the average length of those trips to reflect the proportional impact to the roadway network. As a result, the methodology for determining the relative distribution of traffic impacts between residential and non-residential uses for the purposes of TUMF utilizes a VMT based approach. The RivCoM 2021 Existing Network and 2045 No -Build model runs were examined to determine the VMT of various trip types that would take place in Western Riverside County (excluding through trips). The results were compared to determine the growth in VMT for each trip type. Per WRCOG policy (based on National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) recommended practice) trips originating in or destined for a home are attributed to residential development while trips where neither the origin nor the destination are a home are attributed to non-residential development. 24) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS socio-economic forecasts were used to estimate the number of single-family and multi -family dwelling units that will be developed during the 2018 to 2045 period. 25) The Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE's) trip generation rates, which come from surveys of existing sites for various development types, were then used to estimate the daily number of trips that will be generated by future single- and multi -family developments that will occur in the region from 2018 to 2045. 26) The cost to be covered by residential development was divided into the portion attributable to new single-family dwellings and portion attributable to new multi- family development to calculate the cost share for each use. 27) The cost share for single-family dwellings and multi -family dwellings was divided by the number of dwellings of each type to determine the fee level required from each new dwelling unit to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments. 2.3.5. Computing the Fee for Non -Residential Developments A process similar to that used for residential units was used to determine the fee level for non-residential development. However, the determination of fees for non-residential development involves additional steps due to the additional complexity of accounting for a greater variety of development types within each use category. Chapter 5 and Chapter 6 of this report provide additional explanation regarding the methodology for accomplishing these steps along with the results of this analysis. WRCOG 10 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 28) Like many impact fee programs, TUMF groups similar development projects together into general use categories to simplify the administration of the program. TUMF groups the various land use categories found in ITE's Trip Generation Manual into four non-residential categories (industrial, retail, service, and government/public sector) based on the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which is also used by the U.S. Census Bureau and SCAG for demographic classifications and is the basis for such classifications in the SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model as well as and the RivCoM model. The ITE trip generation rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates. The median value for the trip - generation rates for all uses within each category was used in the nexus study to represent the trip -generation characteristics for the category. 29) The trip -generation rates of retail and service uses were adjusted to take into account the share of pass -by trips these uses generate. Pass by trip rates for various retail and service uses were derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the median value of all uses as the basis for the adjustment. The ITE pass by trip rates for all uses were reviewed for accuracy and updated to reflect the most current ITE published rates. 30) The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS socio economic forecasts included non-residential employment for 2018 and 2045. These forecasts were used to estimate the growth in employment in each of the four non-residential uses. 31) The SCAG employment forecasts are denominated in jobs while development applications are typically denominated in square feet of floorspace. The ratio of floorspace per employee was determined as a median value derived from four studies, including a comprehensive study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties conducted in 1990, an OCTA study conducted in 2001, a SCAG study (including a specific focus on Riverside County) conducted in 2001, and the Riverside County General Plan adopted in 2015. 32) The forecast growth in employees was multiplied by the floorspace per employee to produce a forecast of the floorspace that will be developed for each of the four non-residential use types. 33) The trip -generation rate for each of the four uses was multiplied by the forecast of new floorspace to estimate the number of trips generated by each use. 34) The amount of project costs to be covered by non-residential development was split between the four non-residential uses to determine the TUMF cost share for each. 35) The TUMF cost share for each of the four non-residential uses was divided by the forecast growth in floorspace to determine the fee level required from each new square foot of non-residential development to cover their fair share of the cost to mitigate the impacts of new developments. 36) WRCOG has adopted a TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook that allows for fee adjustments to be made to account for unusual circumstances for certain types of residential and non-residential development (fuel filling stations, golf courses, high -cube warehouses, wineries, electric charging stations, etc.) These WRCOG > > Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 adjustments are intended to calculate a fairer proportional fee based on the unique trip generation characteristics of these development types. The outcome of this process is a schedule of fees for the various use categories identified as part of the TUMF program. The study conclusions including the Schedule of Fees is presented in Chapter 7 of this report. The schedule of fees represents the maximum fee permissible under California law for the purposes of the TUMF program. The WRCOG Executive Committee has the option to adopt lower fees, however, in doing so each use category subject to a lower fee would not be contributing a fair share of the cost of their impacts. This would in turn create a funding gap for the program that would necessitate identifying additional project funding from some other source to ensure the cumulative regional impacts of new development are being mitigated fully in accordance with the program. WRCOG 12 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 2.0 FUTURE GROWTH 2.1 Recent Historical Trend Western Riverside County experienced robust growth in the period from the late 1990's to the mid 2000's. The results of Census 2000 indicate that in the year 2000, Western Riverside County had a population of 1.187 million representing a 30% increase (or 2.7% average annual increase) from the 1990 population of 912,000. Total employment in Western Riverside County in 2000 was estimated by the SCAG to be 381,000 representing a 46% increase (or 3.9% average annual increase) over the 1990 employment of 261,000. Despite the impacts of the Great Recession and the associated residential mortgage and foreclosure crisis, and more recently with the shifting of population during and following the COVID-19 pandemic, Western Riverside County has continued to grow due to the availability of relatively affordable residential and commercial property, and a generally well-educated workforce. By 2010, the population of the region had grown to 1.742 million, a further 47% growth in population from 2000. Similarly, total employment in the region had also grown from 2000 to 2010 with 434,000 employees estimated to be working in Western Riverside County. This represents a 12% increase from the 381,000 employees working in the region in 2000. 2.2 Available Demographic Data A variety of alternate demographic information that quantifies future population, household and employment growth is available for Western Riverside County. For earlier versions of the TUMF Nexus Study, the primary available source of consolidated demographic information for Western Riverside County was provided by SCAG. SCAG is the largest of nearly 700 Councils of Government (COG) in the United States and functions as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for six counties in Southern California including Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura and Imperial. SCAG is mandated by the federal government to research and plan for issues of regional significance including transportation and growth management. As part of these responsibilities, SCAG maintains a comprehensive database of regional socioeconomic data and develops demographic projections and travel demand forecasts for Southern California. In preparation for the 2020 RTP/SCS, SCAG undertook robust stakeholder engagement, including participation by WRCOG, Riverside County and the various cities in Western Riverside County, to develop regional demographic forecasts. Using input from regional stakeholders regarding anticipated patterns and rates of development, SCAG compiled and disseminated the forecasts that were ultimately adopted in 2020, including those specific to Western Riverside County. The SCAG forecasts adopted for the 2020 RTP/SCS were subsequently used as the basis for RivCoM and are used as the basis for this TUMF Nexus Study Update. WRCOG 13 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 2.3 Demographic Assumptions Used for the Nexus Study Analysis A major distinction between data used for the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data used for this 2024 Update is the change in the base year from 2012 to 2018, as well as the change in the horizon year from 2040 to 2045. This shift in the base year and horizon year demographic assumptions of the program carries through all aspects of the nexus analysis, including the travel demand forecasting, network review and fee calculation. The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS data were compared to the 2016 RTP/SCS data used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update. As can be seen in Table 2.1 and Figure 2.1, the 2018 data reflects an increase in population and single-family households, and a very slight decline in multi -family households. Employment grew substantially overall, with significant growth in industrial employment, largely attributable to the rapid expansion of warehousing and logistics facilities in Western Riverside County. In contrast, there was a notable decline in government and public sector employment in the region from 2012 to 2018 Table 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County SED Type 2016 Update (2012) 2024 Update (2018) Change Percent Total Population 1,773,935 1,905,440 131,505 7% Total Households 525,149 554,573 29,424 6% Single -Family 366,588 397,407 30,819 8% Multi -Family 158,561 157,166 -1,395 -1 % Total Employment 460,787 570,420 109,633 247o Industrial 120,736 169,334 48,598 40% Retail 65,888 73,814 7,926 12% Service 253,372 308,703 55,331 22% Government/Public Sector 20,791 18,569 -2,222 -1 1% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS WRCOG 14 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure 2.1 - Base Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,OOC 1,200,001 1,000,00 800,0( 6(0,04 400,0 200,( zr y e .z•O o� Dos s`� Household Type Single -Family ■ Multi -Family Employment5ectors ❑ Industrial Q Service Retail Government/Public Sector Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2 compare the socioeconomic forecasts for the program horizon year of 2045 used in the TUMF Nexus Study 2016 Update and 2045 for this study. The most recent forecasts reflect an increase in the horizon year population and households, and a decrease in overall employment in Western Riverside County. The change in employment was not, however, consistent across sectors. The retail employment forecast has decreased approximately 15% from 2040 to 2045, while the industrial employment forecast has increased over 20%. This shift is consistent with the emergence of e-commerce as an alternative to traditional "brick and mortar" retail. WRCOG 15 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County SED Type 2016 Update (2040) 2024 Update (2045) Change Percent Total Population 2,429,633 2,533,876 104,243 4% Total Households 775,231 812,399 37,168 5%a Single -Family 539,631 564,898 25,267 5% Multi -Family 235,600 247,501 11,901 5% Total Employment 861,455 I 846,442 -15,013 -27o TUMF Industrial 201,328 245,915 44,587 22% TUMF Retail 101,729 86,929 -14,800 -15% TUMF Service 528,092 482,958 -45,134 -9% TUMF Government/Public Sector 30,306 30,640 334 1% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Figure 2.2 - Horizon Year Socioeconomic Estimates for Western Riverside County 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,00( 1,200,001 1,000,OC 800,0( 600,Oi 400,C 200,( Household Type Single -Family ■ Multi -Family Employment Sectors ❑ Industrial 0 Service Retail Government/Public Sector WRCOG 16 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 2.3 and Figure 2.3 summarize the socioeconomic data obtained from SCAG and used as the basis for completing this Nexus Study analysis. The SCAG employment data for 2018 and 2045 was provided for thirteen employment sectors consistent with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) Major Groups including: Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Retail Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service; and Government. For the purposes of the Nexus Study, the EDD Major Groups were aggregated to Industrial (Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities), Retail (Retail Trade), Service (Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service) and Government/Public Sector (Government). These four aggregated sector types were used as the basis for calculating the fee as described in Section 6.2. Appendix B provides a table detailing the EDD Major Groups and corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Categories that are included in each non- residential sector type. Table 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) SED Type 2018 2045 Change Percent Total Population 1,905,440 2,533,876 628,436 3317o Total Households 554,573 812,399 257,826 46% Single -Family 397,407 564,898 167,491 42% Multi -Family 157,166 247,501 90,335 57% Total Employment 570,420 846,442 276,022 4817o TUMF Industrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 45% TUMF Retail 73,814 86,929 13,115 18% TUMF Service 308,703 482,958 174,255 56% TUMF Government/Public Sector 18,569 30,640 12,071 65% Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS WRCOG 17 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure 2.3 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (2018 to 2045) 2,500: ax 2AM,00c i,soo,oa i3ODa XOR Household Type ❑ Single -Family ❑ MultFFamily Employment Sectors ❑ Industrial ❑ Service ❑ Retail ❑ Government/Public Sector The combined effects of the changes in the base year and horizon year socioeconomic data are modest reductions in the total growth in population and single-family households, but a notable increase in multi -family households. The change in total employment is reduced by 31 %, with the most significant reduction in employment growth in the retail sector (-63%), while the industrial sector saw only a slight reduction in total employment growth compared to the 2016 Nexus Update (5%). The Government/public sector employment growth has increased by 27% from the 2016 Nexus Study to the 2024 Nexus Study, although the total number of jobs increased is relatively small as a share of the total employment. Table 2.4 and Figure 2.4 provide a comparison of the changes in population, households and employment between the 2016 Nexus Update and the 2024 Nexus Update. The table and figure clearly illustrate the reduction in the rate of growth in Western Riverside County largely attributable to the effects of the economic recession. This reduced rate of growth in the region will serve as the basis for reevaluating the level of impact of new development on the transportation system in the next section, as well as providing the basis for the determination of the fair share fee for each land use type. WRCOG 18 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) SED Type 2016 Update (2012-2040) 2024 Update (2018-2045) Difference Percent Total Population 655,698 628,436 -27,262 -4% Total Households 250,082 257,826 7,744 3% Single -Family 173,043 167,491 -5,552 -3% Multi -Family 77,039 90,335 13,296 17% Total Employment 400,668 276,022 -124,646 -3117o TUMF Industrial 80,592 76,581 -4,01 1 -5% TUMF Retail 35,841 13,115 -22,726 -63% TUMF Service 274,720 174,255 -100,465 -37% TUMF Government/Public Sector 9,515 12,071 2,556 27% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS WRCOG 19 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Figure 2.4 - Population, Households and Employment in Western Riverside County (Existing to Future Change Comparison) 700,OM 600,000 500,000 400,00( 300,00 200,0( 100,DI QOQJ\ 0 aS \b ae ar o\ 'j4 ,yp .r0 �0 Household Type ❑ Single -Family ❑ Multi -Family Employment Sectors Industrial Service Retail Government/Public Sector WRCOG 20 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 3.0 NEED FOR THE TUMF All new developments have some effect on the transportation infrastructure in a community, city or county due to an increase in travel demand. Increasing usage of the transportation facilities leads to more traffic, progressively increasing VMT, traffic congestion and decreasing the level of service (LOS)3. To meet the increased travel demand and keep traffic flowing, improvements to transportation facilities become necessary to sustain pre -development traffic conditions. The projected growth in Western Riverside County (33% growth in population and 48% growth in employment in 27 years) and the related growth in VMT can be expected to increase congestion and degrade mobility if substantial investments are not made in the transportation infrastructure. This challenge is especially critical for arterial highways and roadways that carry a significant number of the trips between cities, since traditional sources of transportation improvement funding (such as the gasoline tax and local general funds) will not be nearly sufficient to fund the improvements needed to serve new development. Development exactions generally provide only a fraction of the improvements with those being confined to the area immediately adjacent to the respective development, and the broad -based county -level funding sources (i.e., Riverside County's half -cent sales tax known as Measure A) designate only a small portion of their revenues for arterial roadway improvements. This section documents the existing and future congestion levels that demonstrate the need for future improvements to the transportation system to specifically mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development. It then describes the TUMF concept that has been developed to fund future new developments' fair share of needed improvements. The forecast of future congestion levels is derived from Year 2045 No -Build travel demand forecasts for Western Riverside County developed using RivCoM. The Year 2045 No -Build scenario evaluates the effects of 2045 population, employment and resultant traffic generation on the 2021 existing arterial highway network. 3.1 Future Highway Congestion Levels To support the evaluation of the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the existing arterial highway system in Western Riverside County, existing (2018) and future (2045) SED were modeled on the existing (2021) arterial highway network using RivCoM. To quantify traffic growth impacts, various traffic measures of effectiveness were calculated for the AM and PM peak periods for each of the two scenarios. The 3 The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition - A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis (Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2016, Volume 1 - Concepts, pp 5-3) describes LOS as a "quantitative stratification of performance measure or measures representing quality of service .... HCM defines six levels of service, ranging from A to F, for each service measure or combination of measures. LOS A represents the best operating conditions from the traveler's perspective and LOS F the worst." WRCOG 21 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from the greater regional model network for the purpose of calculating measures for Western Riverside County only. Peak period performance measures for the Western Riverside County TUMF study area included total VMT, total vehicle hours of travel (VHT), total combined vehicle hours of delay (VHD), and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E). These results were tabulated in Table 3.1. Plots of the Network Extents are attached in Appendix C. Total Arterial VMT, VHT, VHD and LOS E Threshold VMT were calculated to include all principal arterials, minor arterials and major connectors, respectively. Regional values for each threshold were calculated for a total of all facilities including arterials, freeways, freeway ramps and High -Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes. Table 3.1 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing to 2045 No -Build) Measure of Performance* Peak Periods Total 2018 Existing 2045 No -Build % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 28% 0.9% VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 15% 0.5% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 47% 1.4% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 38% 1.2% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 541,350 915,439 69% 2.0% VHT - FREEWAYS 263,792 399,128 51% 1.5% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 277,558 516,311 86% 2.3% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 174,455 320,869 84% 2.3% VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 108,900 338,056 210% 4.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 66,156 170,649 158% 3.6% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 42,745 167,407 292% 5.2% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 33,249 124,863 276% 5.0% VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 5,605,070 13,369,483 139% 3.3% VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,725,471 9,316,891 97% 2.5% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 879,599 4,052,592 361 % 5.8% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 765,782 3,184,133 316% 5.4% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 127o 377o * Based on RivCoM 2018 base network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network as existing in December 2021 NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free -flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan. WRCOG 22 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 The following formulas were used to calculate the respective values: VMT = Link Distance * Total Daily Volume VHT = Average Loaded (Congested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume VHD = VHT - (Free -flow (Uncongested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume) VMT LOS E or F = VMT (on links where Daily V/C exceeded 0.90) Note: Volume to capacity (v/c) ratio thresholds for LOS E are based on the Transportation Research Board 2010 Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2010) LOS Maximum V/C Criteria for Multilane Highways with 45 mph Free Flow Speed (Exhibit 14-5, Chapter 14, Page 14-5). The calculated values were compared to assess the total change between 2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build scenarios, and the average annual change between 2018 Existing and 2044 No -Build. As can be seen from the RivCoM outputs summarized in Table 3.1, the additional traffic generated by new development will cause peak period VMT on the arterial highway network to increase by approximately 47% by the year 2045 (approximately 1.4% per year). In the absence of additional improvements to the transportation network in Western Riverside County, the growth in VMT will cause congestion on the highway system to increase almost exponentially, with the most significant increase in congestion observed on the arterial highway system that includes the TUMF Network. Many facilities will experience a significant increase in vehicle delay and deterioration in LOS to unacceptable levels because of new development and the associated growth in traffic. According to the Highway Capacity Manual 6t" Edition - A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis (Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2016), "LOS E describes operation at or near capacity. Operations... at this level are highly volatile because there are virtually no usable gaps within the traffic stream, leaving little room to maneuver within the traffic stream. Any disruption to the traffic stream, such as vehicles entering ... or a vehicle changing lanes, can establish a disruption wave that propagates throughout the upstream traffic stream .... the physical and psychological comfort afforded drivers is poor." The Congestion Management Program for Riverside County (CMP) published by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) in 2011 designates LOS E as the "traffic standards must be set no lower than LOS E for any segment or intersection along the CMP System of Highways and Roadways" in Riverside County. "The intent of the CMP is to more directly link land use, transportation, and air quality, thereby prompting reasonable growth management programs that will effectively utilize new transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related impacts, and improve air quality." 4 The CMP provides a mechanism for monitoring congestion on the highway system and, where congestion is observed, establishes procedures for developing a deficiency plan to address improvement needs. The reactive nature of the CMP to identify and remediate existing congestion differs from the proactive nature of the TUMF program to anticipate and provide for future traffic needs. For this reason, the TUMF 4 Congestion Management Program for Riverside County - Executive Summary (Riverside County Transportation Commission, 201 1) Page ES-3, ES-1 WRCOG 23 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 program follows the guidance of the Highway Capacity Manual in establishing LOS E as the threshold for unacceptable level of service, and subsequently as the basis for measuring system performance and accounting for existing needs. This approach ensures a more conservative accounting of existing system needs as part of the determination of the "fair share" of mitigating the cumulative regional impacts of future new development on the transportation system. The continuing need for a mitigation fee on new development is shown by the adverse impact that new development will have on Western Riverside County's transportation infrastructure, and particularly the arterial highway network. As a result of the new development and associated growth in population and employment in Western Riverside County, additional pressure will be placed on the transportation infrastructure with the total peak period VMT on the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials (RSHA; also referred to as the TUMF Network) estimated to increase by approximately 38% or 1.2% compounded annually. As shown in Table 3.1, the peak period VMT on arterial facilities within the TUMF Network experiencing LOS E or worse will increase by approximately 316% or 5.4% compounded annually in Western Riverside County in the period between 2018 and 2045. By 2045, 37% of the total VMT on the TUMF arterial highway system is forecast to be traveling on facilities experiencing daily LOS E or worse. Without improvements to the TUMF arterial highway system, the total vehicle hours of delay (VHD) experienced by area motorists on TUMF arterial highways during the peak periods will increase by approximately 5.0% per year. The combined influences of increased travel demand and worsened LOS that manifest themselves in severe congestion and delay highlighting the continuing need to complete substantial capacity expansion on the TUMF arterial highway system to mitigate the cumulative regional impact of increased travel demand resulting from new development. The RivCoM outputs summarized in Table 3.1 clearly demonstrate that the travel demands generated by future new development in the region will lead to increasing levels of traffic congestion, especially on the arterial roadways. The need to improve these roadways to accommodate the anticipated growth in VMT and relieve future congestion is therefore directly linked to the future development which generates the additional travel demand. 3.2 Future Transit Utilization Levels In addition to the roadway network, public transportation will play a role in serving future travel demand in the region. Transit represents a critical component of the transportation system by providing an alternative mode choice for those not wanting to use an automobile, and particularly for those who do not readily have access to an automobile. As population and employment in Western Riverside County grows because of new development, demand for regional transit services in the region is also expected to grow. WRCOG 24 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 While some future transit trips will be accommodated by inter -regional transit services such as Metrolink, a substantial number of the trips within Western Riverside County will be served by bus transit services and for this reason the provision of regional bus transit service is considered integral to addressing the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new developments. Regional bus transit services within Western Riverside County are primarily provided by RTA. In 2023, RTA reported average weekday daily ridership of 16,575 on their network of buses5. The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS forecasts for RTA average weekday daily ridership in 2045 is 57,282. These values were used to represent the existing and future transit trips consistent with the analysis of highway trips described in Section 3.1. The existing and future transit ridership were compared to assess the impact of new development on transit demand. Average weekday daily ridership would be expected to grow by 40,707 between 2023 and 2045, or an average increase of 1,850 weekday daily riders each year. Average weekday daily system ridership is summarized in Appendix D. The future growth in demand for public transit services is reflective of the cumulative regional impacts of new development, and the associated increase in demand for all types of transportation infrastructure and services to accommodate this growth. Furthermore, bus transit ridership is expected to grow as the improved services being planned and implemented by RTA attract new riders and encourages existing riders to use transit more often as an alternative to driving. Attracting additional riders to bus transit services contributes to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development by reducing the number of trips that need to be served on the highway system. The need to provide additional bus transit services within Western Riverside County to satisfy this future demand is therefore directly linked to the future development that generates the demand. 3.3 The TUMF Concept A sizable percentage of trip -making for any given local community extends beyond the bounds of the individual community as residents pursue employment, education, shopping and entertainment opportunities elsewhere. As new development occurs within a particular local community, this dispersal of trips of all purposes by new residents and the new business that serve them generates additional travel demand and contributes to the need for transportation improvements within their community and in the other communities of Western Riverside County. The idea behind a uniform mitigation fee is to have new development throughout the region contribute uniformly to paying the fair share cost of improving the transportation facilities that serve these trips between communities. Thus, the fee is intended to be used primarily to improve S RTA, like most public transportation agencies, have seen significant short-term declines in transit ridership resulting from changes in travel demands, mode choice and trip distribution following the COVID-19 pandemic. RTA's 2016 actual average weekday daily ridership was 30,700. Post COVID-19, the RTA actual average weekday daily ridership in 2023 was 16,575, a decline of almost 50% of pre -pandemic ridership levels. These levels would be expected to continue to recover toward pre -pandemic levels as potential riders resume more regular work schedules, and apprehension toward the use of transit services for public health reasons wane. WRCOG 25 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 transportation facilities that serve trips between communities within the region (in particular, arterial roadways and regional bus transit services). Some roadways serve trips between adjacent communities, while some also serve trips between more distant communities within the region. The differing roadway functions led to the concept of using a portion of the fee revenues for a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve the longer -distance trips (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region), while using a second portion of the fee revenues for a secondary system of arterials that serve inter -community trips within a specific subregion or zone (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the communities most directly served by these roads - to some extent, a return -to -source of that portion of the funds). Reflecting the importance of public transit to provide an alternative to highway travel as part of a balanced regional transportation strategy, a third portion of fee revenues was reserved for improvements to regional bus transit services (i.e. using TUMF revenues from the entire region). Much, but not all, of the new trip -making in each area is generated by residential development (i.e. when people move into new homes, they create new trips on the transportation system as they travel to work, school, shopping or entertainment). Some of the new trips are generated simply by activities associated with new businesses (i.e. new businesses will create new trips through the delivery of goods and services, etc.). Apart from commute trips by residents coming to and from work, and the trips of residents coming to and from new businesses to get goods and services, the travel demands of new businesses are not considered to be directly attributable to residential development. The consideration of different sources of new travel demand is therefore reflected in the concept of assessing both residential and non-residential development for their related transportation impacts. In summary, the TUMF concept includes the following: ➢ A uniform fee that is levied on new development throughout Western Riverside County. ➢ The fee is assessed roughly proportionately on new residential and non-residential development based on the relative impact of each new use on the transportation system. ➢ A portion of the fee is used to fund capacity improvements on a backbone system of arterial roadways that serve longer -distance trips within the region; a portion of the fee is returned to the subregion or zone in which it was generated to fund capacity improvements on a secondary system of arterial roadways that link the communities in that area; and a portion of the fee is used to fund improvements to regional bus transit services that serve trips between the communities within the region. WRCOG 26 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 4.0 THE TUMF NETWORK 4.1 Identification of the TUMF Roadway Network An integral element of the initial Nexus Study was the designation of the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials. This network of regionally significant highways represents those arterial and collector highway and roadway facilities that primarily support inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional freeway system. As a result, this system also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Network does not include the freeways of Western Riverside County as these facilities primarily serve longer distance inter -regional trips and a significant number of pass -through trips that have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County6. The TUMF Network is the system of roadways that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. The RSHA for Western Riverside County was identified based on several transportation network and performance guidelines as follows: 1. Arterial highway facilities proposed to have a minimum of four lanes at ultimate build -out (not including freeways). 2. Facilities that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities both within and adjoining Western Riverside County. 3. Facilities with forecast traffic volumes exceeding 20,000 vehicles per day in the future horizon year. 4. Facilities with forecast volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 (LOS E) or greater in the future horizon year. 5. Facilities that accommodate regional fixed route transit services. 6. Facilities that provide direct access to major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi -modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers). Appendix E includes exhibits illustrating the various performance measures assessed during the definition of the RSHA. Transportation facilities in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied these guidelines were initially identified, and a skeletal regional transportation framework evolved from facilities where several guidelines were observed. Representatives of all WRCOG constituent jurisdictions reviewed this framework in the context of current local transportation plans to define the TUMF Network, which was subsequently endorsed by 6 Since pass -through trips have no origin or destination in Western Riverside County, new development within Western Riverside County cannot be considered responsible for mitigating the impacts of pass -through trips. The impact of pass - through trips and the associated cost to mitigate the impact of pass -through trips (and other inter -regional freeway trips) is addressed in the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Western Riverside County Freeway Strategic Plan, Phase II - Detailed Evaluation and Impact Fee Nexus Determination, Final Report dated May 31, 2008. WRCOG 27 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 the WRCOG Public Works Committee, WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee, TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee. The RSHA is illustrated in Figure 4.1. As stated previously, the RSHA represents those regional significant highway facilities that primarily serve inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and therefore also represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Network was reviewed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to ensure facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process resulted in the removal of various facilities from the TUMF Network, as well as various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network. The resulting TUMF Network used as the basis for this Nexus Update is discussed in Section 4.3 of this report. WRCOG 28 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 JURUPA VALLEY 6 /Grand Terrace Yucaipa Figure 4.1 - Regional System of SS , iF o Center .� 0 C'nt-Glln. Ca�_� �e� x (Ma n)— A9-� �� County 1 ` Highways and Arterials for Western 'anch �e0e9 Jai \e3' �O�mb. °�o 0akLine _ Riverside County �, �.,ec�le 3 `°rr�adrS�C,A v 'P°�� Cany�°n CALIMESAIN�o 3 �.° e o �� m chP �` Oak'Valle f e= u, o lunalley v Unvr. Q J Cd�y o es Cherry Valley co 3 <-d � Morongo SChlsm, 1 North Central a°j n " g Reservation ' o v o, ' Oak Valley o Arlington o o Ironwood o a v (14th) o a E J 6th U 90 _° =w, S rr�rnr �... ' a Norco m 3 Eucal—tus m o o Imo tWilson aBANIVING River �s y m o ' YP a, The 6th; . . —F / 1, U Alessandro ,� z 0 1st Lncln. Rainse n I�Bypa sq Pass C o Hills NORCO \r soy ore o Badlands y 1 �� r, outh r ' c 2nd ° w JFK Cots o Ln Hidden j MORENO VALLEY railroad 3 RIVERSIDE s' af6i Gii� 0 Pa � r Grn• Valley o � Van Buren = rn 0 i m d7 r; m CORONA l v C 3°c o� s°^i can v BEAUMONT �P4"LM G N d�L o a 7 s 9 SPRINGS r o n o� 96,^ � ; - FlarleY Knox ntm •� o 1, O t n d ISa �- Ln `, o���// o �° �� 1 Ramona c Mid -County (Ramona) `/ac �\ Ca�a\co 2 d G°� Mid - County !♦ (Placentia)_ d �^� �� - - ` -WL9vt San ern L i Z '. Jacinth State R No 1 Nuevo SA'` •••��������� e — g%74 erris cJACINTO w �ctth) �. 1 3o Soboba r .. o w Reservation ; a Lakev1ew HEMET �, Ellis � Esplanade Cds Mo.ufl ains m o t ''•• PERRIS e �f CO SR-74/SR-79;� ' �..� ewe a� �L� (Florida) .�?1r,,)t`SR-74 , Idyllwihtl Tustin i scd/Co Ethanac SR-74 �c� " (Florida) .� �yO M En Stetsn. ` 00, McCall 6� hols Ln m ° -�_�_ Aft 4620jt Nic CANYON LAKE Sun omen 9 N HE IT Rouse J°J �� MEN`FEE .. HemetJSan Ridge + I n/I ne m Newport LAKE+ELSINORE nn °� O r a n g Ca y Lake est �2 L Elsiiar�road a Holland m Jacinto i Rancho Santa 3 Lv Margarita Lakeland Villa nyon Scott Santa Ana ; Gr d Bundy CaKeller v ,m\_ 1 , #4^ Mountains o� a� o Thoma d ar v j Mounta S a Mission Vie o ode Clinton Keith Joaquin ° WILDOMAR °'�idr m h Benton Hills m MURRIETA �° p 4,' G C'a �`etd Murrit. Hot @ o Pia Springs o 4y aguna Beach Prs° An 0`e South '� TEMECULA m M o u Marga Legend�- , • o me Temecula N. TUMF Road 0 Cities �•.� � S\R79( pV\0 reek i a� San Mateo VAP y, Council ofGovernments �� Canyon Network r _ ; County Boundaries ~ Esri, NA A! A, USG FE, A bur . U.S. Census, County of Riverside, California Stat-,Parks, Esri, (TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, r _ TUMF Zone~� �:hanga USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS Santa = R !,rvation Margarita_ �� �� 4.2 Backbone Network and Secondary Network As indicated previously, the TUMF roadway network was refined to distinguish between facilities of "Regional Significance" and facilities of "Zonal Significance." Facilities of Regional Significance were identified as those that typically are proposed to have a minimum of six lanes at general plan build-out7, extend across and/or between multiple Area Planning Districts8, and are forecast to carry at least 25,000 vehicles per day in 2045. The Facilities of Regional Significance have been identified as the "backbone" highway network for Western Riverside County. A portion of the TUMF fee is specifically designated for improvement projects on the backbone system. The backbone network is illustrated in Figure 4.2. Facilities of Zonal Significance (the "secondary" network) represent the balance of the RSHA for Western Riverside County. These facilities are typically within one zone and carry comparatively lesser traffic volumes than the backbone highway network, although they are considered significant for circulation within the respective zone. A portion of the TUMF is specifically designated for improvement projects on the secondary network within the zone in which it is collected. The WRCOG APD or zones are illustrated in Figure 4.3. 7 Although facilities were identified based on the minimum number of lanes anticipated at general plan buildout, in some cases it was determined that there was not sufficient demand for all additional lanes on some facilities until beyond the current timeframe of the TUMF Program (2045). As a result, only a portion of the additional lanes on these facilities have currently been identified for funding with TUMF revenues, reflecting the cumulative impact of new development through the current duration of the TUMF Program. 8 Area Planning Districts (APD) are the five aggregations of communities used for regional planning functions within the WRCOG area. Area Planning Districts are interchangeably referred to as TUMF Zones. WRCOG 30 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 JURUPA VALLEY 'pry Grand Terrace __ Yucaipa _ Figure 4.2 -Backbone Network of ��� —� � center.: � ; y��^�� :� ~ - �� - — - - — - (Mai-_-.� r Highways and Arterials for Western h"''�'� ya: q - ► oakrl°n Cline 1 ounty Bye Riverside County 43 CALIMESA alley llnivrsty� 1,.1 v"r E ti Cherry Valley BANNING Morongo }{ V cc;' isman i 1 s rn /y i H Reservation •A North Central jn c rsj Oak = E Arlirx,Iton o Ironwood CJ V1111 (1) o 'a s _5 ° 0 � _ � San Gorgonio Rvr ¢G .� a 3S Eucalyptus I The a �au6Yh° t a Hills F� - Fa NORCt7 Alessandro► or o Badlands Sun Laa Lnd. Rams' I"za ByAass � Pas s 2nd� RI VERSlDE Ccts. as Saud � • • + �1 V�alllley IFK � � MOREND VALLEY � .. 4 Pass2. ►, been idraad CORONA �r7y Van Buren = 7� Gad, a° • .� �yV{.r-y� .yam ^y N Spr. Ur�d � o� BEAUMONT r - y°o 6'Q - -Y Knox Cen LI Ci l • L�t`❑� Ca}oleo 1 Mid County [Ramoria] ✓�,�- r - • Mid FCaunty untY �r 1 ��` �:. • (Placentia}a• ' • ^ — 1 1 _ SA tht • `A1, erri L � {{ ~ 1■�W 1 Nuevo ��-.., - �— e * 1 ` JAClNTD 9 - — `Zi — m -Pdrk - — — — — — — w ■_.A [4th] erris � � � ��J Soboba y w ► Reservation • Ellis Esplanade I , c Lakeview NEMET �+ 1 PERRIS >y �I�E2 SR 74LSR 79 ro r 1 Tustin t ��• Te �- Ethanac SR 74 Florida . Ln ')0t SR-74 ti 1 � � �,� � { } � fdyllwi IE [Florida] • f I j nyOn J �^ Stetson 1 ;tia6Lr Nf 401 Sun Ii C HEMET f �" ■ rza fr chols 1� CANYON AKE - X , MENlFEE Hemp+'Sa n Ridge , C� Irvine ( F "MI L� " _ Newport �Q �� `1 ' �v tip' `Q'' LAKE ELSINORE C.y�` N Jacinto �+ a r a n g Lake est ' �° Isi o Yr ♦} jr t m 1 Rancho Santa'' �� Lakeland Villa t Soatt Margarita ��• , � � ti Santa Ana �e Bund - Keller" off v i Mountains Thom G b •.• s 1 5 n r WlLDDMAR 8 Mount u d ar Clinton 1 Mission Vie o - °a Keith q Joaquin �,.,r Benton Hills ` MURRlETA y J 4j, ' G J'�ta Murrit. Hot N 0 Springs na Beach q An � Southwest �M o u r } ' ❑t2 TEMECLILA �� � - i Legend A ��s'° �,� — ■ SR-75{Tess�c� u Creek t ; • TUMFNetwork - - TUMF Zone San Mateo pkw•] coundIofCove mments } �.. Canyon Cities �I Backbone ' + Esri, NASA, NGA, US urc ensus, County of Riverside, California State Par sri, TomTorn, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, r _ J County Boundaries Santa �+� echanga _B reau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS Secondary - ,rvation �- Margarita 16--- -- — --y.- o, 42 San Gorgonio Figure 4.3 - Western Riverside County Area Planning Districts JUMF Zones) Ima Linda 0 Redlands Wilderness Yucaipa _ _ 60 Center Chino Cnt Glln. ve — (Main). p�9e _ _ _ _ _ Cnt. I 1 Chino Hills FLanch �e\\e9ta L �a�\e� �`e� CI. �ti C°r0dss/ — —Uve — — — — — — — Lam= �m fl �� t Igt fitd°, �° ` P�,chP CBM011 0(SVC//ey ec°c 1 62. Limonite = h U—M'. L. �a�� Cd ) Sln9\ i K. �L° A Cherry Valley 1 z Sch/s. / 3 Q ��G°c Os J i North Central m- v �� 1. Oak a f Arlington u r Ironwod. E o v Ga Vally.(14t.) I Pass J 6th Ci va c a s m m 1�lJ 1— Rv, Norco d3s 3� U o Eclypt. at 0 6th Wilson - Alessandro z 0 1st Sung L Ramsl Y; IIS Bypass Chino Hills State a o a Park 1 L°i� 2n• Hidden °�a Vic °� Ccts. °1 N outh� f — \ JFK Y 1 Valley apo Vdd 3 o LAG.vacs rt CD N G� Rai/r e r �3 j 4r 1 r6 Mm d I 111 °oF: l = hsbr. mF------- 91 �'96. o Central r_ O hyo�Q •- — Purley Know s `\ Foothill hEdrro F RamonaMid-County° f ` ° s6 ✓y �� (Ramona) (U r ♦ Gee aja\cO C° o I 243 Palm Mid -County ♦` � ; (Placentia) Mount San \s 1 Jacinto State Northwest 3� Nuevo f', _�_ Park ro a f, Lathy > j 2>J °?� o 241 L� Ellis Cd u' o Esplanade1 �0) SR-74/SR-79 SR=74 �iL7 �4 (Florida) U) (Florida), I Idyllwild Agua Caliente 1 Ethanac doh SR-r74 ay 1 4 Stetson McCI. �J* Nichols 2F QomenigOn/ Hemet/San I 7a' 133 ♦ m <CL) �o — n 1 --I ♦♦ -' � l 2: Newport Jacinto _I rn 1 Lake Forest ♦ ♦ �% Railroad Holland '2' o ♦ ♦ �' Canyon C° j ... Rancho Santa / f ® Margarita Scott v // drjo Keller °� ` 1 i I DI \� ` r 0 J Clinton °°a g`t ► Mission Viejo / �� °dj Keith / o / JJ` Oih�� Benton Legend .one Central Hemet/San Jaci Northwest Pass Southwest r VI / vJ Murrit, Hot Sant 74 // Southwest°yP�a cl Springs o ° ♦\ 371 Resear 'E c.°r a 1 co t r Cahuilla Reservation �___________ 1 ✓' � / 371 r �G ♦ Beauty Beauty 1 Mountain Mountain 1 _County of Ri side, California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeG�rh OViME-T-lJif�1ASA,\lW�+�,rIW;r�8ueAftlYand Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS — — 4.3 Future Roadway Transportation Needs To calculate a "fair share" fee for new development, it is necessary to estimate the cost of improvements on the TUMF system that will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of future transportation demands created by new development. Estimates of the cost to improve the network to mitigate the cumulative impacts of new development were originally developed based on unit costs prepared for the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) Regional Arterial Cost Estimate (RACE)9, and the WRCOG Southwest District SATISFY 2020 Summary of Cost Estimates10 (TKC/WRCOG 2000). The RACE cost estimates were developed based on a summary of actual construction costs for projects constructed in Riverside County in 1998. The initial unit cost estimates for the TUMF (based on inflated RACE cost estimates) were reviewed in the context of the SATISFY 2020 Draft Cost Estimates and were consolidated to provide typical improvement costs for each eligible improvement type. The refinement of unit costs was completed to simplify the process of estimating the cost to improve the entire TUMF network. Based on RACE and SATISFY 2020, consolidated cost estimates included typical per mile or lump sum costs for each of the improvement types eligible under the TUMF Program. The resultant revised unit cost estimates were used as the basis for estimating the cost to complete the necessary improvements to the TUMF network to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development. Variations in the consolidated cost estimates for specific improvement types were provided to reflect differences in topography and land use across the region. Unit costs for roadway construction were originally varied to account for variations in construction cost (in particular, roadway excavation and embankment cost) associated with construction on level (code 1) rolling (code 2) and mountainous (code 3) terrain, respectively. Right-of-way acquisition costs which originally included consideration for land acquisition, documentation and legal fees, relocation and demolition costs, condemnation compensation requirements, utility relocation, and environmental mitigation costs were also varied to account for variations in right-of-way costs associated with urban (developed commercial/residential mixed uses - code 1), suburban (developed residential uses - code 2) and rural (undeveloped uses - code 3) land uses, respectively. Lump sum costs for interchange improvements were originally varied to account for variations in cost associated with new complex, new standard (or fully reconstructed), or major (or partially reconstructed) or minor (individual ramp improvements) interchange improvements. As part of the 2024 TUMF Nexus Update, the original unit cost categories were revised to generate entirely new unit cost values based on the most recent available construction cost, labor cost and land acquisition cost values for comparable projects within Riverside County. The recalculation of the TUMF unit cost components was completed 9 Parsons Brinckerhoff/Coachell a Valley Association of Governments, 1999, Regional Arterial Cost Estimate (RACE) 'a TKC/Western Riverside Council of Governments, 2000, SATISFY 2020 Summary of Cost Estimates WRCOG 33 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to reflect the effects of significant changes in materials, labor and land acquisition costs including the influences of supply chain disruptions during and following the COVID-19 pandemic, and the elevated rates of inflation prevailing in the past few years. Appendix F provides a detailed outline of the assumptions and methodology leading to the revised TUMF unit cost assumptions developed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update. A new category was also added to the cost assumptions to facilitate the use of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) to enhance traffic flows in arterial corridors that require mitigation but cannot accommodate construction of addition lane capacity. Section 8.5.1 of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003, states that "each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation. Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% - 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts." This expectation is reiterated in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update (Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., October 2020) Section 6 which indicates that "about 44% of the revenue for the program" is expected to be derived from non -fee sources, including " the Measure A sales tax which is authorized through 2039 and other transportation funding sources such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF)." Consistent with the MSHCP Nexus Report, an amount equal to 5% of the construction cost for new TUMF network lanes, bridges and railroad grade separations will be specifically included as part of TUMF Program with revenues to be provided to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for the acquisition of land identified in the MSHCP. The relevant sections of the MSHCP document and the most recent MSHCP Nexus Report are included in Appendix F. Table 4.1 summarizes the unit cost estimate assumptions used to develop the TUMF network cost estimate as part of the current Nexus Update. Table 4.1 also includes a comparison of the original TUMF unit cost assumptions and the 2016 Nexus Study unit cost assumptions that demonstrates the significant increases in unit costs observed during recent years. In most cases the unit cost assumptions have more than doubled from those used for the 2016 Nexus Study. Cost estimates are provided in current year values as indicated. To estimate the cost of improving the regional network to provide for traffic growth from new development, the network characteristics and performance guidelines (outlined in Section 4.1) were initially used as a basis for determining the needed improvements. The initial list of improvements was then compared with local General Plan Circulation Elements to ensure that the TUMF network included planned arterial roadways of regional significance. A consolidated list of proposed improvements and the unit cost assumptions were then used to establish an initial estimate of the cost to improve the network to mitigate for future traffic growth associated with new development. This initial list of proposed improvements has since been revised and updated as part of each subsequent Nexus Update to reflect the completion of projects, changing levels of development and associated changes in travel demand and transportation system impacts to be mitigated as part of the TUMF program. WRCOG 34 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 4.1 - Unit Costs for Arterial Highway and Street Construction Original Cost Cost Assumptions Cost Assumptions Component Assumptions as per 2016 Nexus per 2024 Nexus Description Type published Study Update October 18, 2002 July 10, 2017 Terrain 1 $550,000 $692,000 $1,132,000 construction cost per lane mile level terrain Terrain 2 $850,000 $878,000 $1,740,000 Construction cost per lane mile rolling terrain Terrain 3 $1,150,000 $1,064,000 $2,350,000 Construction cost per lane mile mountainous terrain Landuse 1 $900,000 $2,509,000 $7,830,000 Row cost factor per lane mile - urban areas Landuse 2 $420,000 $2,263,000 $5,440,000 Row cost factor per lane mile - suburban areas L Landuse 3 $240,000 $287,000 $490,000 ROW cost factor per lane mile rural areas Complex new Interchange 1 n/a $50,032,000 $84,190,000 interchange/interchange modification cost Interchange 2 $20,000,000 $25,558,000 $43,490,000 New interchange/interchange modification total cost Interchange 3 $10,000,000 $12,343,000 $22,550,000 total Interchange improvement total cost Bridge 1 $2,000 $3,180 $4,800 Bridge total cost per lane per linear foot RRXing 1 $4,500,000 $6,376,000 $18,200,000 New Rail Grade Crossing per lane RRXing 2 $2,250,000 $2,733,000 $6,900,000 Existing Rail Grade Crossing per lane ITS 1 $686,400 Infrastructure for ITS of roadway segments per route mile Planning, preliminary engineering Planning 10% 10% 10°7. and environmental assessment costs based on construction cost only Project study report, design, Engineering 25% 25°Jo0 25�/o permitting and construction oversight costs based on construction cost only Contingency 10% 10% 10% Contingency costs based on total segment cost Administration 4�/0 4% TUMF program administration based on total TUMF eligible network cost TUMF component of MSHCP based MSHCP 5% 5% on total TUMF eligible construction cost As indicated in Table 2.4 and Figure 2.4, the anticipated rate of forecasted growth in Western Riverside County has been reduced by 4% for population, 3% for single-family residential and 31 % for employment. This reduced rate of forecasted socioeconomic growth has a commensurate impact on the forecasted daily traffic in the region as demonstrated by the 2016 Nexus Study VMT compared to the 2024 Nexus Update VMT in Table 4.2. As shown in the table, the forecast peak period VMT on the TUMF arterial network in the year 2045 as the basis for the 2024 Nexus Update is more than 5% less than the comparable peak period VMT for 2040 used for the 2016 Nexus Study. WRCOG 35 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 4.2 - Forecasted Daily Traffic in Western Riverside County Measure of Performance 2024 Nexus Update 2016 Nexus Study Peak Period Peak Period 2018 Existing 2045 No -Build 2012 Existing 2040 No -Build VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 19,532,437 29,277,587 VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 11,019,155 14,487,570 VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 8,513,282 14,790,016 TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 5,585,202 9,089,495 Source: RivCoM 2018 base network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network as existing in December 2021; RivTAM 2012 network and SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2015 arterial network completed by WSP, September 2016 As a result of the reduced forecast traffic growth in the region, it is anticipated that the cumulative regional impacts of new development on the arterial highway and transit systems in the region is also reduced necessitating a reduction in the projects identified on the TUMF Network to mitigate the impacts of new development. As part of the 2024 Nexus Update, the list of proposed improvements included in the initial Nexus Study and validated during the subsequent Nexus updates was reviewed for accuracy and, where necessary, amended to remove or modify projects that have changed in need to mitigate impacts based on changes in the patterns of growth and travel demand within the region. Projects completed since the adoption of the 2016 Nexus Update were also removed from the network to reflect the fact that mitigation at these locations is no longer required. The specific network changes were screened by the WRCOG Public Works Committee for consistency with TUMF network guidelines including travel demand and traffic performance. Based on the findings of the network screening, elements of specific projects were revised to reflect necessary network corrections and modifications to project assumptions. A matrix summarizing the disposition of the requests received as part of the 2024 TUMF Nexus Update was developed and is included in Appendix G. Eligible arterial highway and street improvement types to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development on Network facilities include: 1. Construction of additional Network roadway lanes 2. Construction of new Network roadway segments 3. Expansion of existing Network bridge structures 4. Construction of new Network bridge structures 5. Expansion of existing Network interchanges with freeways 6. Construction of new Network interchanges with freeways 7. Grade separation of existing Network at -grade railroad crossings 8. Installation of ITS along Network roadway segments All eligible improvement types, except for ITS, provide additional capacity to Network facilities to accommodate future traffic growth generated by new development in Western Riverside County. ITS provides the ability to improve traffic flows along corridors WRCOG 36 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 where capacity expansion is not possible. Following the comprehensive update of the TUMF Program, the estimated total cost to improve the RSHA for Western Riverside County is $4.84 billion with this cost including all arterial highway and street planning, engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition and capital construction costs, but not including transit, MSHCP or program administration costs that will be subsequently described. It should be noted that the full cost to improve the TUMF Network cannot be entirely attributed to new development and must be adjusted to account for the previous obligation of other funds to complete necessary improvements and unfunded existing needs. Sections 4.5 and 4.6 describe the adjustments to the total TUMF Network improvement need to account for existing needs and obligated funds. In addition to the arterial highway and street improvement costs indicated above, the TUMF Nexus Update included specific consideration for the TUMF Program obligation to the MSHCP program to mitigate the impact of TUMF network improvements on species and habitat within Western Riverside County. The TUMF obligation to MSHCP was calculated at a rate of 5% of the total construction (capital) cost of new lane segments, bridges and railroad grade separations on the TUMF Network. The total obligation to the MSHCP as indicated in the TUMF Network cost fee table is approximately $64.6 million, although the total obligation specific to the TUMF program is reduced to account for MSHCP obligations associated with improvements addressing existing needs and therefore excluded from TUMF. The TUMF 2024 Nexus Update similarly includes specific consideration of the costs associated with WRCOG administration of the TUMF Program. The average cost for WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program was calculated at a rate of 4% of the total eligible cost of new lane segments (including interchanges, bridges and railroad grade separations) on the TUMF Network and new transit services. Administration costs incurred by WRCOG include direct salary, fringe benefit and overhead costs for WRCOG staff assigned to administer the program and support participating jurisdictions, and costs for consultant, legal and auditing services to support the implementation of the TUMF program. The total cost for WRCOG administration of the TUMF Program as indicated in the TUMF Network cost fee table is approximately $161.2 million. The detailed TUMF network cost calculations are provided in Section 4.7, including each of the individual segments and cost components considered as part of the TUMF Program, and the maximum eligible TUMF share for each segment following adjustments for obligated funding and unfunded existing needs as described in subsequent sections. 4.4 Public Transportation Component of the TUMF System In addition to the roadway network, public transportation plays a key role in serving future travel demand in the region. Public transportation serving inter -community trips is generally provided in the form of public bus transit services and in particular express bus or other high frequency services between strategically located community transit centers. In Western Riverside County, these bus transit services are typically provided by WRCOG 37 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 RTA. Transit needs to serve future regional travel in Western Riverside County via bus transit include vehicle acquisitions, transit centers, express bus stop upgrades, maintenance facilities and other associated capital improvements to develop express bus or other high frequency inter -community transit bus services within the region. Metrolink commuter rail service improvements were not included in the TUMF Program as they typically serve longer inter -regional commute trips equivalent to freeway trips on the inter -regional highway system. The network of regionally significant bus transit services represents those express bus and other high frequency transit bus services that primarily support inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional highway system and inter- regional commuter rail services. As a result, this portion of the bus transit system also represents the extents of the network of bus services that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The TUMF Bus Transit Network is the system of bus services that serve inter -community trips within Western Riverside County and therefore are eligible for improvement funding with TUMF funds. The Bus Transit Network for Western Riverside County was identified based on several transit network and performance guidelines as follows: 1. Bus transit routes (or corridors comprised of multiple overlapping routes) proposed to have a frequency of greater than three buses per direction during peak hours at ultimate build out. 2. Routes or corridors that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities, both within and adjoining western Riverside County. 3. Routes or corridors with forecast weekday bus ridership in excess of 1,000 person trips per day by 2040. 4. Routes or corridors that are proposed to provide timed interconnections with at least four other routes or corridors at ultimate build out. 5. Routes or corridors that utilize the majority of travel along the TUMF RSHA. 6. Routes or corridors that provide direct access to areas of forecast population and employment growth, major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi -modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers). Express bus routes and other high -frequency bus transit routes and corridors in Western Riverside County that generally satisfied the respective guidelines were identified by RTA. Updated cost estimates for improving the infrastructure serving public transportation, including construction of transit centers and transfer facilities, express bus stop upgrades, and capital improvements needed to develop express bus and other high frequency bus transit service within the region were also provided by RTA. The updated transit unit cost data provided by RTA are shown in Table 4.3. WRCOG 38 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 4.3 - Unit Costs for Transit Capital Expenditures Original Cost Cost Assumptions Cost Component Type* Assumptions as per 2016 Nexus Assumptions per Description published Study 2024 Nexus October 18, 2002 July 10, 2017 Update Relocation/expansion of Transit Center 1 $6,000,000 $7,465,000 existing Regional Transit Center with up to 14 bus bays and ark and ride New Regional Transit Center Transit Center 2 $6,000,000 $9,000,000 $11,195,000 with up to 14 bus bays and park and ride Transfer Facility $1,000,000 $1,245,000 Multiple route transfer hub O & M Facility $50,000,000 $62,186,000 Regional Operations and Maintenance Facility Green Technology $100,000 ZEB technology enhancements Bus Stop $10,000 $40,000 $50,000 Bus Stop Amenities Upgrade on TUMF Network BRT Service Capital $540,000 $60,000 $75,000 BRT/Limited Stop Service Capital (per stop**) Vehicle Fleet I*** $160,000 Small Sized Bus/Van Contract Operated Vehicle Fleet 2 $155,000 $300,000 Medium Sized Bus Contract Operated Vehicle Fleet 3 $325,125 $585,000 $1,271,000 Large Sized Bus Directly Operated Comprehensive COA Study $950,000 $1,150,000 Operational Analysis Study component of Nexus Study Update * Transit Cost Component Types were restructured as part of the 2016 Nexus Update in accordance with the RTA Comprehensive Operational Analysis (January 2015) ** BRT Service Capital Cost Assumption was based on a per mile unit prior to the 2016 Nexus Update. 2016 Nexus Update uses a per stop unit cost for BRT Service Capital *** Vehicle Fleet component was restructured as part of the 2024 Nexus Update with the inclusion of Small Sized Bus/Van Contract Operated as Vehicle Fleet 1 and subsequent renumbering of Vehicle Fleet 2 and 3, respectively The estimated total cost for future RTA bus transit services to accommodate forecast transit demand is approximately $217.9 million with this cost including all planning, engineering, design and capital improvement costs. Detailed transit component cost estimates are included in Section 4.7. The full cost to improve RTA bus transit services cannot be entirely attributed to new development and must be adjusted to account for existing needs. Section 4.6 describes the adjustments to the total transit cost to account for existing needs. WRCOG 39 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 4.5 Existing Obligated Funding For some of the facilities identified in the TUMF network, existing obligated funding has previously been secured through traditional funding sources to complete necessary improvements. Since funding has been obligated to provide for the completion of needed improvements to the TUMF system, the funded cost of these improvements will not be recaptured from future developments through the TUMF Program. As a result, the TUMF network cost was adjusted accordingly to reflect the availability of obligated funds. To determine the availability of obligated funds, WRCOG staff, in conjunction with RCTC staff, completed a review of the current Federal Transportation improvement Program (FTIP) to identify TUMF eligible projects that were also programmed to receive funding from alternate sources. A table summarizing the obligated funds for segments of the TUMF network is included in Appendix H. A total of $382.9 million in obligated funding was identified for improvements to the TUMF system. The estimated total TUMF network project cost was subsequently reduced by this amount. 4.6 Unfunded Existing Improvement Needs A review of the existing traffic conditions on the TUMF network (as presented in Table 3.1) indicates that some segments of the roadways on the TUMF system currently experience congestion and operate at unacceptable levels of service. In addition, demand for inter -community transit service already exists and future utilization of proposed inter -community transit services will partially satisfy this existing demand. The need to improve these portions of the system is generated, at least in part, by existing demand, rather than solely the cumulative regional impacts of future new development, so future new development cannot be assessed for the equivalent cost share of improvements providing for this existing need. To account for existing need in the TUMF Network, the cost for facilities identified as currently experiencing LOS E or F was adjusted. This was done by identifying the portion of any segment of the TUMF Network with a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio of greater than 0.9 (the threshold for LOS E) in the RivCoM 2018 Existing scenario and extracting the share of the overall facility cost to improve that portion. This cost adjustment provides for the mitigation of incremental traffic growth on those TUMF segments with an existing high level of congestion. The following approach was applied to account for incremental traffic growth associated with new development as part of the existing need methodology: Facilities with an existing need were identified by reviewing the RivCoM 2018 Existing scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network and delineating WRCOG 40 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 those facilities included on the TUMF Cost Fee Summary Table that have an average directional v/c exceeding 0.9011. a. Weighted directional v/c values were used to determine existing need for network segments, which was calculated by: i. Determining the length for the portion of each segment (model link), and calculating the ratio of link length to the overall segment length ii. Generating the average directional v/c for each link, for both directions in AM and PM periods, and multiplying by link/segment length ratio iii. Determining the maximum peak -period peak -direction v/c for each link, representing the highest directional v/c in either AM or PM iv. Calculating weighted average v/c for each TUMF segment, based on the sum of all weighted max v/c values of each link within a segment b. A similar method was used to determine existing need for spot improvements including interchanges, railroad crossings and bridges. However, no weighting was used in the calculation of existing need for spot improvements. For these facilities, the peak -period peak -direction v/c values (highest directional v/c in either AM or PM) were utilized in the existing need calculation. This was based on the individual link within a network segment where a bridge or railroad crossing is located, or on - and off -ramps in the case of interchanges. 2. Initial costs of addressing the existing need were calculated by estimating the share of a particular roadway segments "new lane" cost, or individual spot improvement cost (including all associated ROW and soft costs). 3. Incremental growth in v/c was determined by comparing the average directional exisitng year v/c for the TUMF facilities (delineated under step one) with the horizon year v/c for the corresponding segments and spot improvements calculated based on the RivCoM 2045 No -Build scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network using the same methodology as the existing year v/c. 11 The RivCoM 2021 Existing Network used for the TUMF Nexus Study analyses reflects the RivCoM 2018 base year network augmented to include highways facilities on the TUMF Network as they existed in December 2021. A second version of the base network was also developed adding only those facilities that had been identified on the 2016 TUMF Nexus study 2040 Build scenario that did not currently exist in December 2021 and therefore were not represented by a link(s) in the RivCoM base network. The Supplemental 2021 Existing Network was utilized as the basis for determining existing and future v/c for only those projects that did not currently exist on the 2021 TUMF Network. WRCOG 41 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 4. The proportion of the incremental growth attributable to new development was determined by dividing the result of step three with the total 2045 No -Build scenario v/c exceeding LOS E. 5. For those segments experiencing a net increase in v/c over the base year, TUMF will 'discount' the cost of existing need improvements by the proportion of the incremental v/c growth through 2045 No -Build compared to the 2018 Baseline v/c (up to a maximum of 100%). The unfunded cost of existing highway improvement needs (including the related MSHCP obligation) totals $582.6 million. Appendix H includes a detailed breakdown of the existing highway improvement needs on the TUMF network, including the associated unfunded improvement cost estimate for each segment and spot improvement experiencing unacceptable LOS. For transit service improvements, the cost to provide for existing demand was determined by multiplying the total transit component cost by the share of future transit trips representing existing demand. The cost of existing transit service improvement needs is $63.0 million representing 28.9% of the TUMF transit component. Appendix H includes tables reflecting the calculation of the existing transit need share and the existing transit need cost. 4.7 Maximum TUMF Eligible Cost A total of $382.9 million in obligated funding was identified for improvements to the TUMF system. Since these improvements are already funded with other available revenue sources, the funded portion of these projects cannot also be funded with TUMF revenues. Furthermore, the total cost of the unfunded existing improvement need is $646.9 million. These improvements are needed to mitigate existing transportation deficiencies and therefore their costs cannot be assigned to new development through TUMF. Based on the estimated costs described in Sections 4.3 and 4.4, the total value to complete the identified TUMF network and transit improvements, and administer the program is $5.28 billion. Having accounted for obligated funds and unfunded existing needs as described in Sections 4.5 and 4.6, respectively, the estimated maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program is $4.24 billion. The maximum eligible value of the TUMF Program includes approximately $3.87 billion in eligible arterial highway and street related improvements and $154.8 million in eligible transit related improvements. An additional $53.9 million is eligible as part of the TUMF Program to mitigate the impact of eligible TUMF related arterial highway and street projects on critical native species and wildlife habitat, while $161.2 million is provided to cover the costs incurred by WRCOG to administer the TUMF Program. Figure 4.4 illustrates the various improvements to the RSHA included as part of the TUMF network cost calculation. Table 4.4 summarizes the TUMF network cost calculations for each of the individual segments. This table also identifies the maximum eligible TUMF share for each segment having accounted for obligated funding and unfunded WRCOG 42 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 existing need. A detailed breakdown of the individual cost components and values for the various TUMF Network segments is included in Appendix H. Table 4.5 outlines the detailed transit component cost estimates. It should be noted that the detailed cost tables (and fee levels) are subject to regular review and updating by WRCOG and therefore WRCOG should be contacted directly to obtain the most recently adopted version of these tables (and to confirm the corresponding fee level). WRCOG 43 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 JURUPA VALLEY Grand Terrace Yucaipa Figure 4.4 - Regional System of o Center Highways and Arterials -TUMF C'nt-Gllh. ra�� �e� X (Main)_ A9; --.k County ranch gel\e9 Jai y� eym �__ Live Oakes Line Network Improvements ,�e�`e IM/Sso ~� o COrr�$11 �_(1501 `` Y°n CALIMESA7k o EL fu w alley `a IgF Unvr. ��' qj cd7` �= 5�r°' Cherry f c� °7 �` pd� �di Valley BANNING Morongo Schleisman °, 3 L ry North Central �a ° d// h�^m0ak (mE Reservation 9 �' Ironwood o o ey(ST) Valle 1 = a S n Gorgo 6th Arlington C �� � C y( .) River a` tJorco ��� o Eucalyptus C° o -aumo t Wilsons D/ NORCO li w. " t The o, 6th Rams ,inrin C o Hills —F r0Alessandro LL ore o z Badlands �°�,' 1st Su1L•ks Md. y' I�Bypss Pass 2nd �)rGo o' Gets. a r� SoUth .. r ]FK o r MORENO VALLEY n�i t Hidden U N G,j 0 Pa a..: r Grn railroad Valley 3 RIVERSIDE ds� Van Buren a) m ado o r ■ �� ♦ Rvr. � �. CORONA o�'�i v C' 3°r, fl t3 s°^i '�°j act BEAUMONT PALM L day �% � o a o9s g� L .SPRINGS C O °,� 96,^q � r ' - Harley Knox ntmi �S u r o � ~ ♦� o1 1 Ramona c Mid -County (Ramona) �a� 0 ' Ca�aico ♦ Mid county Mrd,C° 1 6r,'a� '�. 2�� ♦ 1 o ♦ ♦ (Placentia) cn� - Wm.t San erri - % cState L - v le �R No ; Nuevo � Ln SAN �♦..� - - ����v-FhArk �+ �•�.-------�.•� +...1 rns ' �' JACINTO °' �) 3 Soboba a..♦ ° Ellis w cy Esplanade Reservation k� + L s a Lakev1ew �c M0,10 ains o v • d� �.. PERRIS Cd f m , 1 SR 74/SR 79 �\_ SR 74 Idyllwill`" oTustin ` h Ethanac SRr74 (Florida) �•1' I I ■ 2� Q (Florida) ' oMYO Stetson M `. Nichols ' • Su McCall N i9061 HEMET Rouse '- fAJW46zo jt v CA_ N•YON LAKE g Oo�er J �� ,(CIL) MENI FEE Newport HemetJSan Ridge Irvine O r a n g Lake est �� ��, LAKE L Ir• road Canyon 1° Holland , �' Jacinto ELSINORE, Rari ° m` a Rancho Santa Margarita Lakeland Villa o nyon Scott 3 Ca rn .•.. Santa Ana Gr\ gray ^ 1 , /.. ".,. �� •" 1 ho 0 Keller � Mountains a° WILDOMAR,6 P °j Thoma �� �l w ar 3 U. 1 Mounta Legend Ultimate Lanes 0 Interchange 2 O Bridge 4 O Railroad Crossing 6 r _ TUMF Zone ^v 8 = Cities r _ ] County Boundaries Sollti•1 �.� San Mateo Canyon � Esri, �y� I Santa = Margarita_ -rit. Hot Springs ECULA creel xm__ ounty of Riverside,California State An Mou 1 %. ,- % l 1h'e5tern Riverside Council of Governments TomTo armin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, B, reau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USFWS Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTALCOST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Ethanac Goetz Murrieta $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac Murrieta I-215 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Centro l Menifee Ethanac Sherman Matthews $2,674,000 $2,674,000 Central Menifee Ethanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossing $105,560,000 $105,560,000 Central Menifee Menifee SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson $1,307,000 $1,307,000 Central Menifee Menifee Salt Creek bridge $4,384,000 $4,384,000 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergate Newport $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Garbani $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Garbani Scott $4,353,000 $4,353,000 Central Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scott Murrieta City Limit $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Mumeto $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Murrieta 1-215 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Central Menifee Newport 1-215 Menifee $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Menifee Lindenberger $0 $0 Centro l Menifee Newport Lindenberger SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott 1-215 Briggs $8,635,000 $8,635,000 Central Menifee Scott 1-215 interchange $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott Sunset Mumeto $4,388,000 $4,388,000 Central Menifee Scott Murrieta 1-215 $16,949,000 $12,949,000 Centro l Menifee SR-74 Matthews Briggs $8,254,000 $8,254,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro 1-215 Perris $13,420,000 $13,420,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs $18,019,000 $18,019,000 Central Moreno Val ley Gilmon Springs SR-60 Alessandro $7,291,000 $7,291,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 interchange $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Reche Vista Ironwood $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead $0 $0 Centrol Moreno Valley Perris SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $11,192,000 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Cactus Harley Knox $0 $0 Centro l Moreno Valley Reche Vista Country Heacock $7,486,000 $3,799,000 Central Perris 11th/Case Perris Goetz $4,582,000 $4,582,000 Central Perris Case Goetz 1-215 $20,876,000 $20,876,000 Central Perris Case San Jacinto River bridge $1,740,000 $1,235,000 Centro l Perris Ethanac Keystone Goetz $6,056,000 $6,056,000 Central Perris Ethanac San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Centro l Perris Ethanac 1-215 Sherman $5,316,000 $5,316,000 Central Perris Goetz Case Ethanac $1,507,000 $999,000 Central Perris Goetz San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $3,398,000 Central Perris Mid -County (Placentia) I-215 Perris $15,655,000 $15,655,000 Centro l Perris Mid -County (Placentia)-215 interchange $0 $0 Central Perris Mid -County (Placentia) Perris Evans $22,985,000 $22,985,000 Central Perris Mid -County (Placentia) Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Perris Perris Harley Knox Ramona $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Ramona Citrus $7,063,000 $7,063,000 Central Perris Perris Citrus Nuevo $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Nuevo 11th $6,927,000 $6,927,000 Central Perris Perris 1-215 overcrossing bridge $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona 1-215 Perris $5,039,000 $5,039,000 Central Perris Ramona 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $7,725,000 Central Perris Ramona Perris Evans $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona Evans Mid -County (2,800 ft E of Rider) $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (4th) Ellis 1-215 $0 $0 Centro l Unincorporated Ethanac SR-74 Keystone $4,666,000 $4,666,000 Central Unincorporated Gilman Springs Alessandro Bridge Road $30,601,000 $30,601,000 Central Unincorporated Menifee Nuevo SR-74 (Pinacate) $16,684,000 $16,684,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County Evans Ramona (2,800 it E of Rider) $12,156,000 $12,156,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Pico Avenue $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge Road $47,769,000 $47,769,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge $36,192,000 $36,192,000 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon San Bernardino County Reche Vista $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Vista Reche Canyon Country $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Scott Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 Central Unincorporated SR-74 Ethanac Ellis $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco-15 Temescal Canyon $0 $0 Northwes} Corona Cajalco-15 interchange $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Poseo Grande Lincoln $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill California 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River SR-91 Dominguez Ranch $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Dominguez Ranch Palisades $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Poseo Grande $0 $0 Northwes} Eastvale Schleisman San Bernardino County 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek $648,000 $648,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Cucamonga Creek bridge $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison $866,000 $866,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Harrison Sumner $488,000 $488,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Sumner Scholar $7,625,000 $7,625,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Scholar AStreet $119,000 $119,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman A Street Hamner $209,000 $209,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 45 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTALCOST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR-60 Bellegrave $23,928,000 $10,461,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Bellegrave Santa Ana River $60,900,000 $0 Northwest Riverside Alessandro Arlington Trautwein $2,410,000 $2,410,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington La Sierra Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arlington Magnolia Alessandro $46,465,000 $46,465,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Santa Ana River SR-91 $5,230,000 $4,392,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren SR-91 Mockingbird Canyon $39,493,000 $21,292,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Wood Trautwein $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Trautwein Orange Terrace $7,574,000 $7,574,000 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Trautwein Vista Grande $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Vista Grande 1-215 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco El Sobrante Harley John $10,580,000 $9,817,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harley John Harvil $166,492,000 $166,492,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Harvil 1-215 $1,238,000 $1,238,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Canyon La Sierra $49,596,000 $35,953,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco Temescal Wash bridge $4,872,000 $1,907,000 Northwest Unincorporated Cajalco La Sierra El Sobrante $516,453,000 $96,453,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Mockingbird Canyon Wood $67,429,000 $67,429,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Orange Terrace 1-215 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Wilson f8th) Sun Lakes $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $32,516,000 Pass Banning Highland Springs Oak Valley f14th) Wilson (8th) $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley (14th) $0 $0 Pass Banning 1-10 Bypass South 1-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) $50,110,000 $50,110,000 Pass Banning 1-10 Bypass South 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Banning 1-10 Bypass South San Gorgonio bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Pass Banning 1-10 Bypass South UP/Hargrave railroad crossing $52,780,000 $52,780,000 Pass Beaumont Beaumont Oak Valley f14th) 1-10 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Oak Valley fSon Timoteo Canyon) SR-60 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 interchange $63,061,000 $29,561,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero UP railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero Noble Creek bridge $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 4th $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) 1-10 California $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $7,408,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $59,773,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley Roberts St Roberts Rd $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Bellflower Noble $6,411,000 $6,411,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Highland Springs Bellflower $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Noble Roberts St $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley San Timoteo Wash bridge $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated SR-79 (Lamb Canyon) California Gilman Springs $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Warren Sanderson $7,726,000 $7,726,000 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Sanderson State $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 Winchester Warren $35,208,000 $35,208,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Warren Sanderson $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) interchange $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Sanderson State $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona State Main $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Main Cedar $31,518,000 $26,928,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Cedar SR-74 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni SR-79(Winchester) Warren $13,508,000 $13,508,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domenigoni San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Bridge Sanderson $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Bridge Warren $9,221,000 $9,221,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-74 Briggs SR-79 fWinchester) $15,417,000 $15,417,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) SR-74 (Florida) Domenigoni $13,901,000 $13,901,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) Domenigoni Winchester $6,542,000 $6,542,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (San Jacinto Bypass) Mid -County (Ramona) SR-74 fFlorida) $56,690,000 $56,690,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) Gilman Springs Ramona $6,899,000 $2,555,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) San Jacinto River bridge $19,488,000 $7,651,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79(Winchester) Domenigoni Keller $65,022,000 $65,022,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 46 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Southwest Canyon Lake Goetz Railroad Canyon Newport $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills Goetz $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 Canyon Hills $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 interchange $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 1-15 interchange $63,061,000 $24,162,000 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith Copper Craft Toulon $0 $0 Southwest Murneto Clinton Keith Toulon 1-215 $2,076,000 $2,076,000 Southwest Murrieta Clinton Keith 1-215 Whitewood $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto French Valley (Date( Murrieto Hot Springs Winchester Creek $7,321,000 $7,321,000 Southwest Murrieta French Valley (Date( Winchester Creek Margarita $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Menifee City Limit Keller $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Keller Clinton Keith $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Jefferson Diaz $3,929,000 $3,929,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Murrieto Creek bridge $5,846,000 $5,846,000 Southwes} Temecula French Valley (Date( Margarita Ynez $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date( Ynez Jefferson $5,010,000 $5,010,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date( 1-15 interchange $122,076,000 $122,076,000 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester( Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson $2,697,000 $2,697,000 Southwes} Temecula SR-79 (Winches}er( 1-15 interchange $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Diaz( Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga( Rancho California SR-79 (Front) $23,629,000 $23,629,000 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga( 1-15 interchange $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Moroga( Murrieta Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Unincorporated Benton SR-79 Eastern Bypass $0 $0 Southwes} Unincorporated Clinton Keith Whitewood SR-79 $5,539,000 $5,539,000 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Warm Springs Creek bridge $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-74 1-15 Ethanac $27,699,000 $26,347,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester( Keller Thompson $34,213,000 $34,213,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester( Thompson La Alba $27,699,000 $27,699,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester( La Alba Hunter $7,854,000 $3,042,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester( Hunter Murneta Hot Springs $595,000 $442,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon 1-15 Monte Vista $1,362,000 $1,362,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Monte Vista Sunset $24,818,000 $24,818,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $24,613,000 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith Palomar 1-15 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith 1-15 Copper Craft $5,030,000 $0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 47 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Briggs Newport Scoff $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs SR-74 (Pinacate( Simpson $2,991,000 $2,991,000 Central Menifee Briggs Simpson Old Newport $5,430,000 $5,430,000 Central Menifee Briggs Salt Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Menifee Garbani 1-215 interchange $63,061,000 $42,483,000 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane $11,378,000 $11,378,000 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanita $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Murrieta Bradley $15,708,000 $15,708,000 Central Menifee Holland Bradley Haun $11,439,000 $11,439,000 Central Menifee Holland Haun Antelope $9,456,000 $9,456,000 Central Menifee Holland 1-215 overcrossing bridge $9,744,000 $9,744,000 Central Menifee Holland Antelope Menifee $3,844,000 $3,844,000 Central Menifee McCall-215 Aspel $5,354,000 $5,354,000 Central Menifee McCall 1-215 interchange $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee $2,288,000 $2,288,000 Central Menifee Murriefa Ethanac McCall $0 $0 Central Menifee Murrieta McCall Newport $7,967,000 $7,967,000 Central Menifee Murriefa Newport Bundy Canyon $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus 1-215 Heacock $5,617,000 $5,617,000 Central Moreno Valley Cactus 1-215 interchange $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 interchange $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 Eucalyptus $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus 1-215 Towngate $8,843,000 $8,843,000 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus To —gate Frederick $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitching $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitching Moreno Beach $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Frederick SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood SR-60 Day $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Losselle John F Kennedy Oleander $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon Canyon. SR-60 $18,797,000 $18,797,000 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR-60 bridge $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley No on SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Ironwood $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro $39,789,000 $39,789,000 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 Eucalyptus $3,966,000 $3,966,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Perris Ellis Goetz Evans $9,526,000 $9,526,000 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Ramona Morgan $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Morgan Rider $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Rider Placentia $0 $0 Central Perns Evans Placentia Nuevo $6,492,000 $6,492,000 Central Perris Evans Nuevo Ellis $17,705,000 $17,705,000 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge $11,136,000 $11,136,000 Central Perris Evans 1-215 bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Perris Goetz Lesser Ethanac $7,845,000 $7,845,000 Central Perris Harley Knox 1-215 Indian $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox-215 interchange $0 $0 Central Penis Harley Knox Indian Perris $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Perris Redlands $0 $0 Central Penis Nuevo 1-215 Murrieto $16,971,000 $16,971,000 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $19,736,000 Central Perris Nuevo Murrieta Dunlap $4,367,000 $4,367,000 Central Perris Nuevo Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $0 $0 Central it Perris SR-74 (Matthews-215 Ethanac $0 $0 Central SR-74 (Matthews)-215 interchange $32,698,000 $21,835,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main(-215 Mt Vernon $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Center (Main( I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $11,912,000 Central Unincorporated Center (Main( BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Central Unincorporated Ellis Post SR-74 $11,550,000 $11,550,000 Central Unincorporated Mount Vernon/CETAP Corridor Center Pigeon Pass $2,582,000 $2,582,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo Dunlap Menifee $8,737,000 $2,505,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Central Unincorporated Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Mount Vernon $8,106,000 $8,106,000 Central Unincorporated Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Redlands San Tmoteo Canyon Locust $0 $0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 48 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Corona 6th SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Corona Auto Center Railroad SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cajalco Bedford Canyon I-15 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Hidden Valley Norco Hills McKinley $0 $0 Northwest Corona Lincoln Porkridge Ontario $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia 6th Sherbom $7,054,000 $6,419,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Temescal Creek bridge $4,176,000 $3,580,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Sherbom Rimpau $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia Rimpau Ontario $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Grand Ontario $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Ontario Foothill $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Hidden Valley Porkridge $5,314,000 $4,389,000 Northwest Corona Main Parkridge SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main SR-91 S. Grand $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Hidden Valley Promenade $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Promenade SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Arlington Channel bridge $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario 1-15 El Cerrito $13,451,000 $13,451,000 Northwest Corona Ontario Lincoln Buena Vista $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Buena Vista Main $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Main Kellogg $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Kellogg Fullerton $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Fullerton Rimpau $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Rimpau 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Auto Club Buena Vista $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad BNSF railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Northwest Corona Railroad Buena Vista Main (at Grand) $0 $0 Northwest Corona River Corydon Main $0 $0 Northwest Corona Serfas Club SR-91 Green River $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Archibald Remington River $3,382,000 $3,382,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Mission Bellegrave $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Bellegrave Amberhill $199,000 $199,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Amberhill Limonite $2,787,000 $2,787,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Limonite Schleisman $991,000 $991,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Schleisman Santa Ana River $5,533,000 $3,675,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walters $419,000 $419,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Walters River $21,503,000 $21,503,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge $3,828,000 $3,828,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite 1-15 Eastvale Gateway $289,000 $289,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite 1-15 interchange $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Eastvale Gateway Hamner $255,000 $255,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Hamner Sumner $1,094,000 $1,094,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Sumner Hanson $497,000 $497,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Harrison Archibald $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) $2,208,000 $2,208,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge $13,920,000 $0 Northwest Eastvale River Hellman Archibald $5,948,000 $5,948,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Armstrong San Bernardino County Valley $6,192,000 $6,192,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Bellegrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Van Buren $464,000 $464,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville Bellegrave $793,000 $793,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda Philadelphia SR-60 $1,515,000 $989,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda SR-60 Limonite $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite 1-15 Wineville $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Wineville Etiwanda $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Etiwanda Van Buren $2,981,000 $2,981,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Van Buren Clay $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Clay Riverview $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Rubidoux Santa Ana River $5,181,000 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Santa Ana River bridge $13,920,000 $6,204,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission Milliken SR-60 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission SR-60 Santa Ana River $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Riverview Limonite Mission $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux Pine Mission $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $9,051,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Valley Armstrong Mission $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Parkridge Mountain $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Mountain Hamner $0 $0 Northwest Norco 2nd River 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th Hamner California $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $3,489,000 Northwest Norco Arlington Crestview Fairhaven $4,342,000 $4,342,000 Northwest Norco California Arlington 6th $15,237,000 $12,525,000 Northwest Norco Corydon River 5th $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River bridge $33,408,000 $11,455,000 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River Hidden Valley $49,591,000 $49,591,000 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley 1-15 Norco Hills $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley Hamner 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Norco Corydon Hamner $0 $0 Northwest Norco North California Crestview $0 $0 Northwest Norco River Archibald Corydon $1,743,000 $1,109,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 49 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Riverside 14th Market Martin Luther King $0 $0 Northwest Riverside ls} Market Main $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd SR-91 1-215 $1,941,000 $1,941,000 Northwest Riverside 3rd BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $30,560,000 Northwest Riverside Adams Arlington SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 Lincoln $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 interchange $32,698,000 $3,262,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington Fairhaven La Sierra $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Buena Vista Santa Ana River Redwood $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Martin Luther King Central $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Central Country Club $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Country Club Via Vista $4,996,000 $1,593,000 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Via Vista Alessandro $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Chicago 1-215/SR-60 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Alessandro SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Van Buren Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Alessandro Spruce $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Spruce Columbia $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia Main Iowa $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $9,050,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa Center 3rd $30,272,000 $30,272,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa 3rd University $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa University Martin Luther King $0 $0 Northwest Riverside JFK Trautwein Wood $1,880,000 $1,880,000 Northwest Riverside Lo Siena Arlington SR-91 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra SR-91 Indiana $192,000 $192,000 Northwest Riverside Lo Siena Indiana Victoria $778,000 $778,000 Northwest Riverside Lemon (NB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Van Buren Jefferson $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Jefferson Washington $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Washington Victoria $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison SR-91 Victoria $853,000 $853,000 Northwest Riverside Madison BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF Railroad Tyler $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF railroad crossing $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Tyler Harrison $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Harrison 14th $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Main 1st San Bernardino County $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Market 14th Santa Ana River $9,491,000 $9,491,000 Northwest Riverside Martin Luther King 14th 1-215/SR-60 $24,031,000 $24,031,000 Northwest Riverside Mission Inn Redwood Lemon $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Redwood (SB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Troutwein Alessandro Van Buren $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 interchange $63,061,000 $21,814,000 Northwest Riverside Tyler Magnolia Hole $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Hole Wells $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Wells Arlington $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University Redwood SR-91 $859,000 $859,000 Northwest Riverside University SR-91 1-215/SR-60 $2,067,000 $2,067,000 Northwest Riverside Victoria Lincoln Arlington $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Madison Washington $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Washington Victoria Hermosa $27,018,000 $27,018,000 Northwest Riverside Wood JFK Van Buren $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Northwest Riverside Wood Van Buren Bergamont $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Bergamont Krameria $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Cantu-Galleano Ranch Hamner Wineville $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Dos Lagos (Weidck) Temescal Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Cerrito 1-15 Ontario $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Sobrante Mockingbird Canyon Cajalco $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Washington Scottsdale $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Scottsdale Cajalco $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Siena Victoria El Sobrante $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra El Sobrante Cajalco $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Mockingbird Canyon Van Buren El Sobrante $20,871,000 $20,871,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon El Cerrito Tuscany $3,168,000 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Tuscany Dos Lagos $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dos Lagos Leroy $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Leroy Dawson Canyon $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dawson Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon 1-15 Park Canyon $14,329,000 $14,329,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Washington Hermosa Harley John $12,787,000 $12,787,000 Northwest Unincorporated Wood Krameria Cajalco $12,537,000 $12,537,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 50 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTALCOST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Pass Banning 8th Wilson 1-10 $0 $0 Pass Banning Lincoln Sunset SIR $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 1-10 8th $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 8th Highland Springs $0 $0 Pass Banning SR-243 1-10 Wesley $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Home Sunset $30,502,000 $30,502,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Montgomery Creek bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset Ramsey Lincoln $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset 1-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Home 8th $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Viele Pennsylvania $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Pennsylvania Highland Springs $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 6th 1-10 Highland Springs $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Desert Lawn Champions Oak Valley (STC) $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Highland Springs Pennsylvania $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley )14th) Pennsylvania Oak View $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Oak View 1-10 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $62,401,000 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) UP Railroad Tukwet Canyon $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) Tukwet Canyon 1-10 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 6th 1st $6,588,000 $6,588,000 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 1-10 interchange $0 $0 Pass Colimesa Bryant County Line Avenue L $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa County Line 1-10 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Calimesa County Line 7th Bryant $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line 1-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Calimesa Desert Lawn Palmer Champions $0 $0 Pass Colimesa Singleton Avenue L Condit $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Condit Roberts $12,972,000 $12,972,000 Pass Calimesa Singleton 1-10 interchange $63,061,000 $0 Pass Calimesa Tukwet Canyon Roberts Rd Palmer $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Tmoteo Canyon San Bernardino County UP Railroad $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Tmoteo Canyon UP Railroad railroad crossing $52,780,000 $52,780,000 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Acacia Menlo $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Domenigoni Stetson $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson RR Crossing Acacia $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Stetson RR Crossing $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Menlo Esplanade $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74(Florida) Warren Cawston $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 )Florida) Columbia Ramona $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74/SR-79 )Flonda) Cawston Columbia $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Domenigoni Chambers $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Chambers Stetson $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Florida Esplanade $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Stetson Florida $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Cawston State $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Warren Cawston $4,357,000 $4,357,000 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Esplanade Domenigoni $19,926,000 $19,926,000 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Salt Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade Mountain State $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade State Warren $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Sanderson Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 )North Ramona) State San Jacinto $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 )San Jacinto) North Ramona Blvd 7th $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 )San Jacinto) 7th SR-74 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Gilman Springs Quandt Ranch $3,317,000 $3,317,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto State San Jacinto River bridge $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Quandt Ranch Ramona $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Warren Ramona Esplanade $13,469,000 $13,469,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Sanderson State $11,097,000 $11,097,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Massacre Canyon Wash bridge $1,392,000 $1,392,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 )Winchester) SR-74 )Flordo) Domenigoni $0 $0 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 51 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.4 - TUMF Network Cost Estimates (continued) AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTALCOST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Soufhwesf Lake Elsinore Corydon Mission Grand $3,336,000 $3,336,000 Soufhwesf Lake Elsinore Diamond Mission I-15 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Franklin (integral to Railroad I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Canyon Interchange) Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Lincoln Toff $0 $0 South wesf Lake Elsinore Grand Toff SR-74 (Riverside) $3,512,000 $3,512,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake-15 Lincoln $39,817,000 $32,726,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake interchange $32,698,000 $15,771,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake Temescal Wash bridge $2,506,000 $1,150,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Mission Railroad Canyon Bundy Canyon $0 $0 Soufhwesf Lake Elsinore Nichols-15 Lake $7,850,000 $7,850,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols Temescal Wash bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols 1-15 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Collier/Riverside) 1-15 Lakeshore $24,303,000 $24,303,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Grand( Riverside SR-74 (Ortega) $9,733,000 $3,691,000 Soufhwesf Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Riverside) Lakeshore Grand $20,175,000 $20,175,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon 1-15 Lake $7,411,000 $7,411,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash bridge $3,480,000 $3,480,000 Southwest Murrieto Califomia Oaks Jefferson 1-15 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Califomia Oaks 1-15 Jackson $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa California Oaks Jackson Clinton Keith $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Jackson Whifewood Ynez $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa Jefferson Palomar Nutmeg $1,562,000 $1,562,000 Southwest Murrieta Jefferson Nutmeg Murrieto Hof Springs $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa Jefferson Mumefa Hof Springs Cherry $30,634,000 $30,634,000 Southwest Murrieta Keller 1-215 Whifewood $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa Keller 1-215 interchange $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Los Alamos Jefferson 1-215 $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa Mumefa Hof Springs Jefferson 1-215 $0 $0 Southwest Mumefa Mumefa Hof Springs 1-215 Margarita $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Murrieto Hot Springs Margarita SR-79 (Winchester) $4,057,000 $3,899,000 Southwest Mumefa Nutmeg Jefferson Clinton Keith $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Whifewood Clinton Keith Los Alamos $2,708,000 $2,708,000 Southwest Mumefa Whifewood Los Alamos Murrieta Hof Springs $0 $0 Southwest Murrieto Whifewood Murrieto Hot Springs Jackson $4,629,000 $4,629,000 Southwest Mumefa Ynez Jackson SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Murrieto Hot Springs Calle Chapos $816,000 $816,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Calle Chapos La Serena $696,000 $696,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Lo Serena Rancho California $904,000 $904,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Rancho California Pauba $846,000 $846,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Pauba SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $725,000 $725,000 Southwest Temecula Jefferson Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Margarita Murrieto Hot Springs SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $7,644,000 $7,644,000 Southwest Temecula Old Town Front Rancho California 1-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy Via Gilberto Pechanga Pkwy $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Jefferson Margarita $18,254,000 $18,181,000 Southwest Temecula Rancho California 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Margarita Butterfield Stage $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) 1-15 Pechanga Pkwy $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Pechanga Pkwy Butterfield Stage $3,065,000 $3,065,000 Southwest Unincorporated Briggs Scott SR-79 (Winchester) $6,509,000 $6,509,000 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage Tucalota Creek bridge $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage (Pourroy) Auld Mumefa Hof Springs $23,076,000 $23,076,000 Southwest Unincorporated Grand Ortega Corydon $68,025,000 $68,025,000 Southwest Unincorporated Horsefhief Canyon Temescal Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Indian Truck Trail Temescal Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Murrieto Hot Springs SR-79 (Winchester) Pourroy, $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pala Pechanga San Diego County $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pourroy SR-79 (Winchester) Auld $2,236,000 $2,236,000 Southwest Unincorporated Rancho California Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks $87,369,000 $87,369,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Horsefhief Canyon Wash bridge $3,340,000 $3,340,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Truck Trail 1-15 $15,739,000 $15,739,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Wash bridge $1,462,000 $1,462,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Mission 1-15 $9,704,000 $9,704,000 Southwest Wildomar Grand Corydon Wildomar Trail $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Mission Bundy Canyon Palomar $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Clinton Keith Washington $3,227,000 $3,227,000 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Mission Clinton Keith $13,493,000 $13,493,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail 1-15 Baxter $1,281,000 $1,281,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $27,858,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Baxter Palomar $11,316,000 $11,316,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Palomar Grand $0 $0 Subtotal $2,508,329,000 $1,913,028,000 Totals Network $4,840,250,000 $3,874,735,000 Transit $217,870,000 $154,831,000 Administration $161,183,000 $161,183,000 MSHCP $64,606,000 $53,859,000 TOTAL $5,283,909,000 $4,244,608,000 WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update 52 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Table 4.5 - TUMF Transit Cost Estimates AREA PLAN DIST LEAD AGENCY PROJECT NAME LOCATION UNITS (number/ length in miles) UNIT COST TOTAL MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central RTA Menifee Mobility Hub Menifee 1 $7,465,000 $7,465,000 $5,305,000 Northwest RTA Riverside Mobility Hub at Vine Street Riverside 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 Central RTA Moreno Valley Mobility Hub(s) Moreno Valley 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 Northwest RTA Jurupa Valley Mobility Hubs) Jurupa Valley 1 $11,195,000 $11,195.000 $7,956,000 Pass RTA Pass Area Mobility HubJsJ Banning 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 Southwest RTA Lake Elsinore/ Canyon Lake Mobility Hub(s) Lake Elsinore 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 San Jacinto RTA Hemet Mobility Hub Hemet 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 San Jacinto RTA San Jacinto Mobility Hub San Jacinto 1 $11,195,000 $11,195,000 $7,956,000 San Jacinto RTA MSJC Mobility Hub San Jacinto 1 $1,245,000 $1,245,000 $885,000 Regional RTA 7EB Technology Enhancements Various locations region wide 10 $100.000 $1,000,000 $711,000 Northwest RTA Regional Operations and Maintenance Facility$62,186,000 Riverside I $62,186,000 $44.192,000 Regional ETA Annual Transit Enhancements Program Various locations region wide 290 $50,000 $14,500,000 $10,304,000 Northwest RTA HQTC Improvements UCR, Riverside to Perris 42 $75,000 $3,150,000 $2,239,000 Regional RTA Vehicle Fleet Small Buses/Vans Various locations region wide 30 $160,000 $4,800,000 $3,411,000 Regional RTA Vehicle Fleet Medium Buses Various locations region wide 20 $300000 $6,000,000 $4,264,000 Regional RTA Vehicle Fleet Large Buses Various locations region wide 29 $1,271,000 $36,859,000 26,194,000 Regional RTA COA Study Various locations region wide 2 $1,150,000 $2,300,000$1,634,000 $217,870,00054,831,000 r�' TOTAL 4.8 TUMF Network Evaluation To assess the effectiveness of the proposed TUMF Network improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional impact of new development in Western Riverside County, the proposed network improvements were added to the 2021 existing network in RivCoM and the model was run with 2045 socioeconomic data to determine the relative impacts on horizon year traffic conditions. To quantify the impacts of the TUMF Network improvements, the various traffic measures of effectiveness described in Section 3.1 for the 2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build scenarios were again calculated for the 2045 TUMF Build scenario. The results for VMT, VHT, VHD, and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E) were then compared to the results presented in Table 3.1 for the no -build conditions. The 2045 TUMF Build comparison results are provided in Table 4.6. Plots of the Network Extents are attached in Appendix H. As shown in Table 4.6, the 2045 peak period VMT on all arterial facilities experiencing LOS of E or worse will decrease with the addition of the TUMF Network improvements while the share of VMT on the TUMF arterial network experiencing LOS E or worse during the peak periods will be reduced to 32% (which is still above the level experienced in 2018). It should be noted that the total VMT on the arterial system increases because of freeway trips being diverted to the arterial system to benefit from the proposed TUMF improvements. Despite a greater share of the total peak period VMT in 2045, the arterial system can more efficiently accommodate the increased demand with the proposed TUMF improvements. Although peak period VMT on the TUMF improved arterial system increases by approximately 6% in 2045 compared to the No Build condition, VHT on the arterial system remains almost constant. Additionally, a benefit is observed on the WRCOG 53 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 freeway system with VMT and VHT being reduced following TUMF Network improvements. By completing TUMF improvements, the total VHD experienced by all area motorists would be reduced during the peak period by over 7% from the levels that would be experienced under the 2045 No -Build scenario. These results highlight the effectiveness of the TUMF Program to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development commensurate with the level of impact being created. Table 4.6 - Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build Scenarios to 2045 TUMF Build Scenario) Measure of Performance* Peak Periods Total 2018 Existing 2045 No -Build 2045 Build VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 30,160,328 VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 15,418,548 VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 14,741,781 TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 9,096,417 VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 541,350 915,439 895,725 VHT - FREEWAYS 263,792 399,128 388,847 VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 277,558 516,311 506,878 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 174,455 320,869 321,062 VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 108,900 338,056 313,288 VHD - FREEWAYS 66,156 170,649 161,528 VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 42,745 167,407 151,760 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 33,249 124,863 114,451 VMT LOS E - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 5,605,070 13,369,483 12,788,016 VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,725,471 9,316,891 9,1 15,937 VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 879,599 4,052,592 3,672,079 TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 765,782 3,184,133 2,929,288 % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 12% 37% 32% * Source: RivCoM 2018 base network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network as existing in December 2021 and RivCoM 2018 base network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network plus future TUMF network projects. NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free -flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan. WRCOG 54 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 5.0 TUMF NEXUS ANALYSIS The objective of this section is to evaluate and document the rational nexus (or reasonable relationship) between the proposed fee and the transportation system improvements it will be used to help fund. The analysis starts by documenting the correlation between future development and the need for transportation system improvements on the TUMF network to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of this new development, followed by analysis of the nexus evaluation of the key components of the TUMF concept. 5.1 Future Development and the Need for Improvements Previous sections of this report documented the projected population, household and employment growth in Western Riverside County, the expected increases in traffic congestion and travel delay, and the identification of the transportation system improvements that will serve these future inter -community travel demands. The following points coalesce this information in a synopsis of how the future growth relates to the need for improvements to the TUMF system. ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing. owing. Development in Western Riverside County is expected to continue at a robust rate of growth into the foreseeable future. Current projections estimate the population is projected to grow from a level of approximately 1.91 million in 2018 to a future level of about 2.53 million in 2045, while employment is projected to grow from a level of about 570,000 in 2018 to approximately 846,000 in 2045 (as shown in Table 2.3). ➢ Continuing growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. Traffic congestion and delay on arterial roadways are projected to increase dramatically in the future (as shown in Table 3.1). Without improvements to the transportation system, congestion levels will grow rapidly and travelers will experience unacceptable travel conditions with slow travel speeds and lengthy delays. ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to future development in Western Riverside County. Traffic using arterial roadways within Western Riverside County is virtually all generated within or attracted to Western Riverside County, since longer -distance trips passing through the region typically use the freeway system, not arterial roadways. Therefore, the future recurring congestion problems on these roadways will be attributable to new trips that originate in, terminate in, or travel within Western Riverside County. ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to alleviate the future congestion caused by new development. To maintain transportation service closer to current levels of efficiency, capacity enhancements will need to be made to the arterial roadway system. These enhancements could include new or realigned roads, additional lanes on existing WRCOG 55 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 roads, new or expanded bridges, new or upgraded freeway interchanges, grade separation of at -grade rail crossings, or the installation of new ITS to improve traffic flows. The completion of improvements to the arterial roadway system would enhance regional mobility and reduce the total peak period vehicles hours of travel (VHT) by over 2%, reduce peak period vehicle hours of delay (VHD) by over 7%, and reduce the share of traffic experiencing congestion in the peak periods by over 4% (as shown in Table 4.6). The specific needs and timing of implementation will depend on the location and rate of future development, so the specific improvements to be funded by the TUMF and their priority of implementation will be determined during future project programming activities as improvement needs unfold and as TUMF funds become available. ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. The criteria used to identify roads for the TUMF network (future number of lanes, future traffic volume, future congestion level, and roadway function linking communities and activity centers and serving public transportation) were selected to ensure that these are the roadways that will serve inter -community travel and will require future improvement to alleviate congestion. ➢ Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. Since a portion of the population does not own an automobile and depends on public transportation for mobility, public transportation infrastructure and service will need to be enhanced and expanded to ensure continued mobility for this segment of the population. In addition, improvements to the public transportation system will be required to ensure that transit service can function as a viable option for future new Western Riverside County residents and employees who choose to avoid congestion by using public transportation. For the reasons cited above, it can be readily concluded that there is a rational nexus between the future need for transportation improvements on the TUMF system and the future development upon which the proposed TUMF would be levied. The following sections evaluate the rational nexus in relation to the system components and the types of uses upon which the fee is assessed. 5.2 Application of Fee to System Components As noted in Section 3.2, the TUMF concept includes splitting the fee revenues between the backbone system of arterials, the secondary system of arterials, and the public transportation system. This section evaluates the travel demands to determine the rational nexus between the future travel demands and the use of the fee to fund improvements to the future system components. The split of fee revenues between the backbone and secondary highway networks is related to the proportion of highway vehicle trips that are relatively local (between WRCOG 56 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 adjacent communities) and longer distance (between more distant communities but still within Western Riverside County). To estimate a rational fee split between the respective networks, the future combined AM and PM peak period travel forecast estimates were aggregated to a matrix of trips between zones to show the percentage of trips that remain within each zone in relation to the volume that travels to the other zones. This analysis was completed using the Year 2045 No -Build scenario trip tables from RivCoM. The first step in the analysis was to create a correspondence table between the TAZs in the model and the five WRCOG TUMF zones (i.e. Northwest, Southwest, Central, Hemet/San Jacinto and Pass). The TAZs were then compressed into six districts (the five WRCOG zones and one for the rest of the SCAG region). Table 5.1 shows the estimated peak period vehicle trips within and between each of the zones. Table 5.2 shows the percentage of peak period vehicle trips within and between the respective zones. Appendix I includes the detailed RivCoM outputs used to develop the regional trip distribution profile shown in Table 5.1 and 5.2. Table 5.1 - 2045 No -Build Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone TO From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 417,608 23,474 89,780 6,301 55,101 57,558 649,822 Hemet/San Jacinto 29,401 209,005 8,647 8,432 16,081 18,078 289,645 Northwest 58,578 2,684 743,234 2,687 11,032 196,041 1,014,257 Pass 8,068 7,585 6,114 110,385 908 32,334 165,395 Southwest 55,812 16,232 32,852 1,976 667,255 62,713 836,839 Outside WRCOG 33,907 7,574 192,712 24,490 33,867 292,550 TOTAL 603,375 266,554 1,073,340 154,271 784,244 1 366,724 1 3,248,507 Based on RivCoM Year 2045 No -Build scenario Table 5.2 - 2045 No -Build Percent Peak Period Vehicle Trips By WRCOG Zone To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64.3% 3.6% 13.8% 1.0% 8.5% 8.9% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 10.2% 72.2% 3.0% 2.9% 5.6% 6.2% 100% Northwest 5.8% 0.3% 73.3% 0.3% 1.1 % 19.3% 100% Pass 4.9% 4.6% 3.7% 66.7% 0.5% 19.5% 100% Southwest 6.7% 1.9% 3.9% 0.2% 79.7% 7.5% 100% Based on RivCoM Year 2045 No -Build scenario WRCOG 57 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUNIF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table 5.3 summarizes the calculation of the split between the backbone and secondary highway networks as derived from the peak period trip values provided in Table 5.1. Peak period vehicle trips to and from areas outside Western Riverside County were subtracted from the calculation, on the presumption that most of their inter- regional travel would occur on the freeway system. Peak period trips between zones (regional) were assigned to the backbone network, since these trips are primarily served by the arterial roadways that provide connections between the zones. Peak period trips within zones (local) were split between the backbone network and the secondary network in proportion to their lane -miles, since roadways on both networks serve intra-zonal trips. The backbone network includes approximately 41.1 % of the lane -miles on the future TUMF system, and the secondary network includes approximately 58.9% of the lane -miles. The backbone network is therefore assigned all the inter -zonal peak period trips plus 41.1 % of the intra-zonal peak period trips. The secondary network is assigned 58.9% of the intra-zonal peak period trips and none of the inter -zonal peak period trips. The overall result is that 51.1 % of the regional travel is assigned to the backbone network and 48.9% is assigned to the secondary network. Table 5.3 - Backbone -Secondary Network Share Calculation Calculation Value Description Input Values Backbone Backbone Secondary Secondary 3,248,507 Value Share Value Share Total Western Riverside County Peak Period Vehicle Trips -659,273 Less Internal/External Peak Period Vehicle Trips Total Peak Period Vehicle Trips Internal to Western Riverside 2,589,234 County 441,747 Peak Period Vehicle Trips Between TUMF Zones 2,147,487 Peak Period Vehicle Trips Within TUMF Zones L 1,243.9 41.1 % 1,786.0 58.9% TUMF Future Network Lane -Miles 3,029.9 441,747 Peak Period Vehicle Trips Between 441,747 100.0% 0 O.O�o TUMF Zones Peak Period Vehicle Trips Within TUMF Zones (as share of intra- 2,147,487 882,332 41.1 % 1,265,155 58.9% zonal trips) 2,589,234 Total Peak Period Vehicle Trips 1,324,079 51.1% 1,265,155 Assigned Based on RivCoM Year 2045 No -Build scenario; TUMF Nexus Study Exhibit H-1 WRCOG 58 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 5.3 Application of Fee to Residential and Non -Residential Developments In order to establish the approximate proportionality of the future traffic impacts associated with new residential development and new non-residential development, the growth in daily VMT between the 2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build Scenarios from RivCoM were aggregated by trip purpose. RivCoM produces person trips (irrespective of mode choice) on the basis of five trip purposes: home -based -work (HBW), home - based -other (HBO), home -based -school (HBS), non -home -based (NHB), and home - based -university (HBU). NCHRP Report #187 Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters User's Guide (Transportation Research Board, 1978) details operational travel estimation techniques that are universally used for the travel demand modeling. Chapter 2 of this report, which details trip generation estimation, states that "HBW (Home Based Work) and HBNW (Home Based Non -Work) trips are generated at the households, whereas the NHB (Non -Home Based) trips are generated elsewhere." In accordance with NCHRP Report #187, growth in daily VMT was aggregated into home - based growth in daily VMT (combining the four home -based purposes: HBW, HBO, HBSC and HBU) and non -home -based growth in daily VMT. The home -based growth in daily VMT represents 77.7% of the total future growth in daily VMT and the non -home -based growth in daily VMT represent 22.3% of the total future growth in daily VMT, as shown in Table 5.4. Appendix J includes the RivCoM outputs used to develop the trip purpose summary in Table 5.4. Table 5.4 - Daily VMT Growth by Trip Purpose for Western Riverside County (2018 - 2045) 2018 EXISTING 2045 NO -BUILD DAILY VMT DAILY VMT VEHICLE TRIP PURPOSE DAILY VMT DAILY VMT GROWTH GROWTH SHARE Home -Based -Work 81,121,525 98,818,811 17,697,286 31.8% Home -Based -Other 114,840,696 138,710,519 23,869,822 42.9% Home -Based -School (K-12) 8,592,941 9,230,272 637,331 1.1% Non -Home -Based 61,534,566 73,907,099 12,372,533 22.3% Home -Based -University 5,377,197 6,400,662 1,023,465 1.8% TOTAL 271,466,925 327,067,363 55,600,437 100.00% Home -Based Trips 43,227,904 77.7% Residential Uses Non -Home -Based Trips 12,372,533 22.3% Non -Residential Uses Based on RivCoM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 and RivCoM Year 2045 No Build Scenario, November 2023 WRCOG 59 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 6.0 FAIR -SHARE FEE CALCULATION The fee amounts, by type of development, that are justified to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development on transportation facilities in Western Riverside County are quantified in this section. The total cost of improving the TUMF system is $5.28 billion. Existing funding obligated for improvements to the TUMF system totals $382.9 million while unfunded improvement needs generated by existing development represent $646.9 million of the total cost. The balance of the unfunded TUMF system improvement needs is $4.24 billion which is the maximum value attributable to the mitigation of the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development in the WRCOG region and will be captured through the TUMF Program. By levying the uniform fee directly on future new developments (and indirectly on new residents and new employees to Western Riverside County), these transportation system users are assigned their "fair share" of the costs to address the cumulative impacts of additional traffic they will generate on the regional transportation system. Of the $4.24 billion in unfunded future improvement needs, 77.7% ($3.30 billion) will be assigned to future new residential development and 22.3% ($946.5 million) will be assigned to future new non-residential development. 6.1 Residential Fees The portion of the unfunded future improvement cost allocable to new residential development through the TUMF is $3.30 billion. Since this future transportation system improvement need is generated by new residential development anticipated through the Year 2045, the fee will be spread between the residential developments projected to be constructed between 2018 and 2045. The projected residential growth from year 2018 to 2045 is 257,826 households (or dwelling units) as is indicated in Table 2.3. Different household types generate different numbers of trips. To reflect the difference in trip generation between lower density "single-family" dwelling units and higher density "multi -family" dwelling units, the TUMF was weighted based on the respective trip generation rates of these different dwelling unit types. For the purposes of the TUMF Program, single family dwelling units are those housing units with a density of less than 8 units per acre while multi -family units are those with a density of 8 or more units per acre. According to the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS forecasts included in Table 2.3 and Appendix B, single family dwelling units (including mobile homes) are forecast to constitute 65.0% of the growth in residential dwelling units in the region between 2018 and 2045. Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11 th Edition (2021) show that, on average, single-family dwelling units generate 0.99 vehicle trips per dwelling unit per hour in the PM peak hour, whereas apartments, condominiums and townhouses (considered to be representative of higher density multi -family dwelling units) generate a median of 0.50 vehicle trips per unit per hour in the PM peak hour. The growth in dwelling units for single-family and multi -family, respectively, were multiplied by the corresponding trip generation rates to determine WRCOG 60 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 the weighted proportion of the change in trips attributable to each use type as the basis for determining the per unit fee required to levy the necessary $3.20 billion to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new residential development. Table 6.1 summarizes the calculation of the fee for single-family and multi -family dwelling units. Appendix K includes worksheets detailing the calculation of the residential (and non-residential) TUMF for Western Riverside County. Table 6.1 - Fee Calculation for Residential Share Residential Sector 2018 Dwelling Units 2045 Dwelling Units Dwelling Unit Change Trip Generation Rate Trip Change Percentage of Trip Change Fee/DU $15,476 Single -Family 397,407 564,898 167,491 0.99 165,816 78.6% Multi -Family 157,166 247,501 90,335 0.50 45,168 21.4% $7,816 Total 554,573 812,399 257,826 210,984 100.0% Household data based on SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS; Trip Generation based on ITE Trip Generation (2021). Consistent with the socio-economic forecasts developed by SCAG and the trip generation basis to assess the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development, the residential fee calculation for TUMF reflects a uniform fee per dwelling unit for two categories as described previously: single-family residential and multi -family residential. On September 28, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsome signed Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602) approving several changes to the Mitigation Fee Act, including the additional of §66016.5 to the California Government Code (CGC). CGC §66016.5(a) (5) (A) states "A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development...." unless certain findings are made. These findings include: "(i) An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on housing development project. (ii) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. (iii) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees." To address these provisions of AB 602, WRCOG analyzed the trip generation characteristics of single-family and multi -family residential dwelling units of various sizes to determine whether the TUMF should be imposed based on the square footage of the respective housing type. The findings of the analyses for single-family and multi -family, respectively, were summarized in technical memoranda that are included in Appendix K. Based on the findings of the analyses, WRCOG has determined that the fee for single-family residential units should be adjusted in four tiers to correlate to the trip generation characteristics associated with various ranges of single-family housing sizes to demonstrate compliance with AB 602. The tiers reflecting the adjustments to the WRCOG 61 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 standard single-family residential fee per dwelling unit (as calculated in Table 6.1) for differing ranges of single-family dwelling unit sizes are summarized in Table 6.2. Adjustments to the standard uniform fair -share single-family residential fee to account for variations in trip generation rates based on the size of the units will be made at the time of determining the fee obligation consistent with the process outlined further in the WRCOG TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook. Table 6.2 - Single -Family Residential Fee Adjustments by Unit Size Adjustment Tier Housing Unit Size Range (in square feet) Base Fee Adjustment Tier 1 Less than or equal to 1,800 80% Tier 2 1,801 to 2,300 90% Tier 3 2,301 to 2,700 100% Tier 4 More than 2,700 125% For multi -family residential units, WRCOG determined that the fee can be imposed on all multi -family units uniformly consistent with the conclusions of the analysis of multi- family trip generation rates by unit size, which demonstrated little variation in trip generation rates across the range of multi -family residential unit sizes. Therefore, the multi -family residential fee, as calculated in Table 6.2, can be applied uniformly to all multi -family residential units under the TUMF program. 6.2 Non -Residential Fees The portion of the unfunded future improvement cost allocable to new non-residential development through the TUMF is $946.5 million. Estimates of employment by sector were obtained from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS socioeconomic data included in Table 2.3 and Appendix B. From the 2045 employment forecast, the amount of employee growth in each sector was calculated. The employment figures were then translated into square footage of new development using typical ratios of square feet per employee derived from four sources including: Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas (PBQD), Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Long Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990; Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County Subarea Model Guidelines Manual, June 2001; SCAG, Employment Density Study, October 31, 2001; and the County of Riverside, General Plan, as amended December 15, 2015. Worksheets showing the development of the TUMF employee conversion factors and the application of the conversion factors to calculate the square footage of future new non-residential development in Western Riverside County are included in Appendix L. To account for the differences in trip generation between various types of non- residential uses, the new non-residential development was weighted by trip generation rate for each sector. Typical trip generation rates per employee were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation - 1 1'" Edition (2021), and were weighted based on a calculated value of trips per employee as derived from the WRCOG 62 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 employee conversion factors and ITE typical trip generation rates per square foot of development, before being assigned to the non-residential categories as follows: Industrial - 0.6 PM peak hour trips per employee, Retail - 1.8 PM peak hour trips per employee, Service - 1.2 PM peak hour trips per employee, and Government/Public - 2.1 PM peak hour trips per employee12. These rates were applied to the employment growth in each sector to determine the relative contribution of each sector to new trip - making, and the $946.5 million was then allocated among the non-residential categories based on the percentage of new trips added. This proportionate non- residential fee share by sector was then divided by the estimated square footage of future new development to obtain the rate per square foot for each type of use. The calculation of the non-residential fee by sector is shown in Table 6.3. Table 6.3 - Fee Calculation for Non -Residential Share Trip Percentage Change in Non -Residential Sector Employment Generation Trip Change of Trip Square Feet of Fee/SF Change Rate per Change Gross Floor Employee Area $2.33 Industrial 76,581 0.6 45,949 15.1 % 61,489,565 Retail 13,115 1.8 23,607 7.8% 6,557,500 $11.21 Service 174,255 1.2 209,106 68.8% 66,735,957 $9.76 Government/Public 12,071 2.1 25,349 8.3% 3,420,665 $23.07 Total 276,022 304,011 100.0% 138,203,688 Employment Change data based on SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS; Trip Generation based on ITE (2021); Change in Square Feet conversion factor based on Cordoba (1990), OCTA (2001), SCAG (2001) and County of Riverside (2015). 12 The median trip generation rate for 'Retail' and 'Service' was reduced to reflect the influence of pass -by trips using the weekday PM peak median pass -by trip rate for select uses as derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (111" Edition) (September 2021). WRCOG 63 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 7.0 CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of the Nexus Study evaluation, there is reasonable relationship between the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new land development projects in Western Riverside County and the need to mitigate these transportation impacts using funds levied through the ongoing TUMF Program. Factors that reflect this reasonable relationship include: ➢ Western Riverside County is expected to continue growing because of future new development. ➢ Continuing new growth will result in increasing congestion on arterial roadways. ➢ The future arterial roadway congestion is directly attributable to the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future development in Western Riverside County. ➢ Capacity improvements to the transportation system will be needed to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. ➢ Roads on the TUMF network are the facilities that merit improvement through this fee program. ➢ Improvements to the public transportation system will be needed to provide adequate mobility for transit -dependent travelers and to provide an alternative to automobile travel. The Nexus Study evaluation has established a proportional "fair share" of the improvement cost attributable to new development based on the impacts of existing development and the availability of obligated funding through traditional sources. Furthermore, the Nexus Study evaluation has divided the fair share of the cost to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of future new development in Western Riverside County in rough proportionality to the cumulative impacts of future residential and non-residential development in the region. The respective fee allocable to future new residential and non-residential development in Western Riverside County is summarized for differing use types in Table 7.1. Table 7.1 - Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee for Western Riverside County Land Use Type Units Development Change Fee Per Unit $15,476 Total Revenue ($ million) Single Family Residential DU 167,491 $2,592.0 Multi Family Residential DU 90,335 $7,816 $706.1 Industrial SF GFA 61,489,565 $2.33 $143.1 Retail SF GFA 6,557,500 $11.21 $73.5 Service SF GFA 66,735,957 $9.76 $651.1 Government/Public SF GFA 3,420,665 $23.07 $78.9 MAXIMUM TUMF VALUE $4,244.6 WRCOG 64 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 8.0 APPENDICES The following Appendices incorporate the extent of materials used to support the development of the WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study and, where appropriate, specifically the 2024 Update. The respective Appendices also incorporate an explanation of the methodology and assumptions used to develop the various elements of the Nexus Study. These Appendices represent a compilation of materials derived from a variety of technical resources. Each of the following Appendices relate to the development of a specific element of the Nexus Study. These Appendices are as follows: Appendix A - List of WRCOG Committees Appendix B - Western Riverside County Population and Employment Growth 2018 - 2045 Appendix C - Western Riverside County Traffic Growth 2018 - 2045 Appendix D - Western Riverside County Transit System Ridership 2018 - 2045 Appendix E - Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials Performance Measures Appendix F - TUMF Network Cost Assumptions Appendix G - TUMF 2024 Program Update Disposition of Network Change Requests Appendix H - TUMF Network Cost Estimate and Evaluation Appendix I - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Distribution Appendix J - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Purpose Appendix K - Residential Fee Calculation Appendix L - Non -Residential Fee Calculation WRCOG 65 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Appendix A - List of WRCOG Committees WRCOG Executive Committee Sheri Flynn City of Banning Mike Lara City of Beaumont Wendy Hewitt City of Calimesa Mark Terry City of Canyon Lake Jacque Casillas (2nd Vice -Chair) City of Corona Christian Dinco City of Eastvale Jackie Peterson City of Hemet Chris Bara'as Past Chair City of Jurupa Valley Brian Tisdale City of Lake Elsinore Bob Karwin City of Menifee Elena Baca -Santa Cruz City of Moreno Valley Lisa DeForest City of Murrieta Kevin Bash City of Norco Rita Rogers Chair City of Perris Chuck Conder City of Riverside Crystal Ruiz City of San Jacinto James Stewart City of Temecula Joseph Morabito City of Wildomar Kevin Jeffries County of Riverside Dist. 1 Karen Spiegel County of Riverside Dist. 2 Chuck Washington County of Riverside Dist. 3 Yxstian Gutierrez County of Riverside Dist. 5 Phil Paule Eastern Municipal Water District Dr. Edwin Gomez Riverside County Superintendent of Schools ex-officio) Brenda Dennstedt Vice -Chair Western Water WRCOG A-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 WRCOG Technical Advisory Committee Doug Schulze City of Banning Elizabeth Gibbs City of Beaumont Will Kolbow City of Calimesa Aaron Brown City of Canyon Lake Brett Channing City of Corona Mark Orme City of Eastvale Mark Prestwich City of Hemet Rod Butler (Past Chair) City of Jurupa Valley Jason Simpson City of Lake Elsinore Armando Villa City of Menifee Mike Lee City of Moreno Valle Kim Summers City of Murrieta Lori Sassoon City of Norco Clara Miramontes Chair City of Perris Mike Futrell City of Riverside Rob Johnson City of San Jacinto Aaron Adams City of Temecula Dan York City of Wildomar Jeff Van Wa enen County of Riverside Joe Mouawad Eastern Municipal Water District Grace Martin March Joint Power Authority Matt Snellings Riverside County Office of Education Craig Miller Western Water WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update A-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 WRCOG Planning Directors' Committee no new appointment made as of 07/24/24 City of Banning Carole Kendrick City of Beaumont Kelly Lucia City of Calimesa Jim Morrisey City of Canyon Lake Joanne Coletta City of Corona David Murray City of Eastvale Monique Alaniz-Fle'ter City of Hemet Joe Perez (Chair) City of Jurupa Valley Damaris Abraham City of Lake Elsinore Cheryl Kitzerow City of Menifee Sean Kelleher 2nd Vice -Chair City of Moreno Valle David Chantaran su City of Murrieta Alma Robles City of Norco Kenneth Phun Vice -Chair City of Perris Judy Eguez City of Riverside Travis Randel City of San Jacinto Matt Peters City of Temecula Matthew Bassi City of Wildomar John Hildebrand County of Riverside Jeffrey Smith March Joint Powers Authority Jennifer Nguyen Riverside Transit Agency Ryan Shaw Western Water WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update A-3 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 WRCOG Public Works Committee Art Vela City of Banning Robert Vestal City of Beaumont Michael Thornton City of Calimesa Stuart McKibben City of Can on Lake Savat Kham hou Vice -Chair City of Corona Jimmy Chung City of Eastvale Noah Rau City of Hemet Paul Toor Chair City of Jurupa Valley Remon Habib City of Lake Elsinore Nick Fidler City of Menifee Melissa Walker City of Moreno Valle Bob Moehling City of Murrieta Sam Nelson City of Norco John Pourkazemi City of Perris Gil Hernandez City of Riverside Stuart McKibbin Vice -Chair City of San Jacinto Patrick Thomas Cit of Temecula Jason Farag City of Wildomar Patricia Romo County of Riverside Lauren Sotelo March Joint Powers Authority Jillian Guizado Riverside County Transportation Commission Mauricio Alvarez Riverside Transit Agency WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update A-4 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 WRCOG Finance Directors' Committee Lincoln Bogard City of Banning Jennifer Ustation City of Beaumont Celeste Reid City of Calimesa Terry Shea City of Canyon Lake Kim Sitton Cit of Corona Amanda Wells City of Eastvale vacant City of Hemet June Overholt City of Jurupa Valley Shannon Buckley City of Lake Elsinore Travis Hickey Cit of Menifee Launa Jimenez Cit of Moreno Valle Javier Carcamo (Past Chair) City of Murrieta Lisette Free City of Norco Ernie Reyna Chair City of Perris Kristie Thomas City of Riverside Erika Gomez 2nd Vice -Chair City of San Jacinto Jennifer Hennessy City of Temecula Adam Jantz City of Wildomar Vacant County of Riverside John Adams Eastern Municipal Water District Grace Martin March Joint Power Authority Dr. Ruth Perez Riverside County Office of Education Kevin Mascaro Western Water WRCOG TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update A-5 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee September 9, 2024 Appendix B - Western Riverside County Population and Employment Growth 2008 - 2035 Although a variety of alternate demographic information is available for the purpose of quantifying population and household growth in Western Riverside County, it was determined that the data developed by SCAG to support the 2020 RTP/SCS represented the most comprehensive source of socioeconomic data (SED) for the six - county SCAG region that includes Riverside County. The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED information is disaggregated to the level of traffic analysis zones (TAZ) that comprise inputs to RivCoM. These SED data by TAZ were extracted from RivCoM (specifically the TAZ_Data.CSV file located in the PopSyn output folder) and aggregated to correspond with the TUMF zones to support this update of the TUMF Nexus. The SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED data retrieved from RivCoM and used as the basis for the Nexus Update is summarized in this Appendix. The SCAG employment data for 2018 and 2045 was provided for thirteen employment sectors consistent with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) Major Groups including: Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Retail Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities; Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service; and Government. For the purposes of the Nexus Study, the SCAG Employment Categories were aggregated to Industrial (Farming, Natural Resources and Mining; Construction; Manufacturing; Wholesale Trade; Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities), Retail (Retail Trade), Service (Information; Financial Activities; Professional and Business Service; Education and Health Service; Leisure and Hospitality; Other Service) and Government/Public Sector (Government). These four aggregated sector types were used as the basis for calculating the fee as described in Section 6.2. This Appendix includes tables detailing the SCAG RTP/SCS SED Employment Categories and corresponding North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Categories that are included in each non- residential sector type. WRCOG 8-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9. 2024 EXHIBIT B-1 Western Riverside Countv Population. Households and Emplovment (20181 - SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Base Year SED Type/Zone Central I Northwest Pass San Jacinto I Southwest Total Population Total Population 1 408,2601 777,9001 98,6881 187,6771 432,9151 1,905,440 Households Single -Family 83,1421 152,8971 24,9371 38,8881 97,5431 397,407 Multi -Family 26,8891 63,5911 8,6611 26,0551 31,9701 157,166 Total Households 110,0311 216,4881 33,5981 64,9431 129,5131 554,573 Employment Farming, Natural Resources and Mining 799 3,431 559 1,625 2,080 8,494 Construction 6,245 31,914 1,807 2,067 13,290 55,323 Manufacturing 4,172 25,866 1,101 925 8,902 40,966 Wholesale Trade 8,428 9,269 268 546 6,490 25,001 Retail Trade 13,346 32,061 5,472 4,564 18,371 73,814 Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 7,349 22,686 1,132 2,132 6,251 39,550 Information 425 2,073 496 177 863 4,034 Financial Activities 1,887 8,632 586 1,003 5,414 17,522 Professional and Business Service 7,834 32,973 3,434 1,630 13,532 59,403 Education and Health Service 20,423 76,884 6,092 13,659 29,192 146,250 Leisure and Hospitality 8,391 21,990 7,207 3,726 18,270 59,584 Other Service 2,834 10,603 1,244 1,891 5,338 21,910 Government 2,579 11,727 871 761 2,631 18,569 TUMF Industrial 26,993 93,166 4,867 7,295 37,013 169,334 TUMF Retail 13,346 32,061 5,472 4,564 18,371 73,814 TUMF Service 41,794 153,155 19,059 22,086 72,609 308,703 TUMF Government/Public Sector 2,579 11,727 871 761 2,631 18,569 Total Employment 84,712 290,1091 30,2691 34,7061 130,624 570,420 Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS EXHIBIT B-2 Western Riverside Countv Population. Households & Emplovment (20451 - SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Horizon Year SED Type/Zone Central I Northwest Pass San Jacinto I Southwest Total Population Total Population 1 594,6781 925,2281 158,0401 289,4391 566,4911 2,533,876 Households Single -Family 133,5071 181,8271 43,9881 70,7131 134,8631 564,898 Multi -Family 53,5551 79,3591 14,3621 43,6541 56,5711 247,501 Total Households 187,0621 261,1861 58,3501 114,3671 191,4341 812,399 Employment Farming, Natural Resources and Mining 712 2,212 527 1,218 2,001 6,670 Construction 18,304 48,533 3,186 5,861 20,236 96,120 Manufacturing 6,836 24,624 1,393 1,149 10,335 44,337 Wholesale Trade 6,150 9,048 324 559 6,529 22,610 Retail Trade 16,310 33,656 7,136 6,338 23,489 86,929 Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 18,227 38,043 2,705 4,771 12,432 76,178 Information 642 2,166 476 191 1,116 4,591 Financial Activities 2,906 9,889 1,229 1,536 6,665 22,225 Professional and Business Service 14,214 41,712 6,016 4,518 21,058 87,518 Education and Health Service 52,764 111,454 13,803 25,739 51,118 254,878 Leisure and Hospitality 13,197 27,739 10,540 8,424 24,641 84,541 Other Service 5,148 13,062 1,532 2,838 6,625 29,205 Government 6,229 18,222 1,176 1,471 3,542 30,640 TUMF Industrial 50,229 122,460 8,135 13,558 51,533 245,915 TUMF Retail 16,310 33,656 7,136 6,338 23,489 86,929 TUMF Service 88,871 206,022 33,596 43,246 111,223 482,958 TUMF Government/Public Sector 6,229 18,222 1,176 1,471 3,542 30,640 Total Employment T 161,639 380,3601 50,043 64,613 189,7871 846,442 Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS EXHIBIT B-3 Western Riverside Countv Population, Households and Emplovment (2018 to 2045 Chanael - SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED Type/Zone Central I Northwest Pass San Jacinto I Southwest Total Population Total Population 1 186,4181 147,3281 59,3521 101,7621 133,5761 628,436 Households Single -Family 50,365 28,930 19,051 31,825 37,320 167,491 Multi -Family 26,666 15,768 5,701 17,599 24,601 90,335 Total Households 77,031 44,698 24,752 49,424 61,921 257,826 Em to ment Farming, Natural Resources and Mining -87 -1,219 -32 -407 -79 -1,824 Construction 12,059 16,619 1,379 3,794 6,946 40,797 Manufacturing 2,664 -1,242 292 224 1,433 3,371 Wholesale Trade -2,278 -221 56 13 39 -2,391 Retail Trade 2,964 1,595 1,664 1,774 5,118 13,115 Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 10,878 15,357 1,573 2,639 6,181 36,628 Information 217 93 -20 14 253 557 Financial Activities 1,019 1,257 643 533 1,251 4,703 Professional and Business Service 6,380 8,739 2,582 2,888 7,526 28,115 Education and Health Service 32,341 34,570 7,711 12,080 21,926 108,628 Leisure and Hospitality 4,806 5,749 3,333 4,698 6,371 24,957 Other Service 2,314 2,459 288 947 1,287 7,295 Government 3,650 6,495 305 710 911 12,071 TUMF Industrial 23,236 29,294 3,268 6,263 14,520 76,581 TUMF Retail 2,964 1,595 1,664 1,774 5,118 13,115 TUMF Service 47,077 52,867 14,537 21,160 38,614 174,255 TUMF Government/Public Sector 3,650 6,495 305 710 911 12,071 Total Employment 76,927 90,2511 19,774 29,907 59,163 276,022 Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Exhibit B-4a - TUMF 2024 Nexus Update Western Riverside County Population, Households and Em to ment 2018-2045 SED Type/Zone 2018 2045 Change Percent Total Population 1,905,440 2,533,876 628,436 33% Total Households 554,573 812,399 257,826 46% Single -Family 397,407 564,898 167,491 42% Multi -Family 157,166 247,501 90,335 57% Total Employment 570,420 846,442 276,022 48% TUMF Industrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 45% TUMF Retail 73,814 86,929 13,115 18% TUMF Service 308,7031 482,9581 174,255 56% TUMF Government/Public Sector 18,5691 30,6401 12,071 65% Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Exhibit B-4b - TUMF 2016 Nexus Update Western Riverside County Population, Households and Em to ment 2012-2040 SED Type/Zone 2012 2040 Change Percent Total Population 1,773,935 2,429,633 655,698 37% Total Households 525,149 775,231 250,082 48% Single -Family 366,588 539,631 173,043 47% Multi -Family 158,561 235,600 77,039 49% Total Employment 460,787 861,455 400,668 877. TUMF Industrial 120,736 201,328 80,592 67% TUMF Retail 65,888 101,729 35,841 54% TUMF Service 253,3721 528,09,21 274,720 108% TUMF Government/Public Sector 20,791 30,306 9,515 46% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS Exhibit B-4c - TUMF 2016 Nexus Update to 2024 Nexus Update Comparison Western Riverside County Population, Households and Employment (Existing to Future Change) SED Type/Zone 2016 Update (2012-2040) 2024 Update (2018-2045) Difference Percent Total Population 655,698 628,436 -27,262 -4% Total Households 250,082 257,826 7,744 3% Single -Family 173,043 167,491 -5,552 -3% Multi -Family 77,039 90,335 13,296 17% Total Employment 400,668 276,022 -124,646 -317 TUMF Industrial 80,592 76,581 -4,01 1 -5% TUMF Retail 35,841 13,115 -22,726 -63% TUMF Service 274,720 174,255 -100,465 -37% TUMF Government/Public Sector 9,515 12,071 2,556 27% Source: SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS EXHIBIT B-4d Western Riverside County Population, Households and Employment Change (2012 to 2040 and 2018 to 2045) TUMF 2016 Nexus Update Comparison to TUMF 2024 Nexus Update b0-D OJD 42-D. DY, KOICO 2WO1 1000 Qo� ,gr v ti fie:- :s 41 A e Sources: Year 2012 to Year 2040 Growth (2016 Nexus Update): SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; WSP, April 2016 Year 2018 to Year 2045 Growth (2024 Nexus Update): SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Household Type ❑ Single -Family ❑ Multi Employment Sectors ❑ Industrial ❑ Service ❑ Retail ❑ Government/Public Sector WRCOG B-7 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT B-4e Difference in Population, Households and Employment Growth in Western Riverside County TUMF 2016 Nexus Update Comparison to TUMF 2024 Nexus Update 20,000 0 -20,000 -40,000 -60,OOC -80,00[ -100,001 -120,00 -140, OC Employees Source: Year 2012 to Year 2040 Growth (2016 Nexus Update): SCAG 2016 RTP/SCS; WSP, April 2016 Year 2018 to Year 2045 Growth (2024 Nexus Update): SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Household Type ❑ Single -Family ■ Multi -Family Employment Sectors Industrial Service Retail Govemment/Public Sector WRCOG B-8 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT B-5a TUMF Non -Residential Category Detailed NAICS Correspondence Summary SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two Digit Code NAICS Three Digit Code TUMF Category Employment Cate ories NAICS Code NAICS Title NAICS Code NAICS Title Industrial Farming, Natural Resources and Mining 11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 111 Crop Production 112 Anal Production and Aquaculture 113 Foreimstry and Logging 114 Fishing, Huntinq and Trapping 115 Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry 21 Mining, quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction 211 Oil and Gas Extraction 212 Mining (except Oil and Gas) 213 Support Activities for Mining Construction 23 Construction 236 Construction of Buildinqs 237 Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction 238 Specialty Trade Contractors Manufacturing 31-33 Manufacturing 311 Food Manufacturinq 312 Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturinq 313 Textile Mills 314 Textile Product Mills 315 Apparel Manufacturing 316 Leather and Allied Product Manufacturinq 321 Wood Product Manufacturing 322 Paper Manufacturinq 323 Printing and Related Support Activities 324 Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturinq 325 Chemical Manufacturinq 326 Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturinq 331 Primary Metal Manufacturinq 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturinq 333 Machinery Manufacturing 334 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturinq 335 Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturinq 337 Furniture and Related Product Manufacturinq 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturinq Wholesale Trade 42 Wholesale Trade 423 Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods 424 Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods 425 Wholesale Trade Agents and Brokers Transportation, Warehousing and Utilities 22 Utilities 221 Utilities 48-49 Transportation and Warehousing 481 Air Transportation 482 Rail Transportation 483 Water Transportation 484 Truck Transportation 485 Transit and Ground Passenger Transportation 486 Pipeline Transportation 487 Scenic and Siqhtseeinq Transportation 488 Support Activities for Transportation 491 Postal Service 492 Couriers and Messengers 493 Warehousin qnd Storq e Retail Retail Trade 44-45 Retail Trade 441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers 444 Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers 445 Food and Beverage Retailers 449 Furniture, Home Furnishings, Electronics, and Appliance Retailers 455 General Merchandise Retailers 456 Health and Personal Care Retailers 457 Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers 458 Clothing, Clothing Accessories, Shoe, and Jewelry Retailers 459 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Musical Instrument, Book, and Miscellaneous Retailers TUMF Non -Residential Category Detailed NAICS Correspondence Summary TUMF SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two Digit Code NAICS Three Digit Code Category Em to ment Cate ories NAICS Code NAICS Title NAICS Code I NAICS Title Service Information 51 Information 512 Motion Picture and Sound Recordinq Industries 513 Publishing Industries 516 Broadcasting and Content Providers 517 Telecommunications 518 Computing Infrastructure Providers, Data Processing, Web Hosting, and Related Services 519 Web Search Portals, Libraries, Archives, and Other Information Services Financial Activities 52 Finance and Insurance 521 Monetary Authorities -Central Bank 522 Credit Intermediation and Related Activities 523 Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other Financial Investments and Related Activities 524 Insurance Carriers and Related Activities 525 Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 531 Real Estate 532 Rental and Leasing Services 533 Lessors of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets (except Copyrighted Works) Professional and Business Services 54 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 541 Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 55 Management of Companies and Enterprises 551 Management of Companies and Enterprises 56 Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 561 Admstrative and Support Services 562 WasteiniManagement and Remediation Services Education and Health Services 61 Educational Services 611 Educational Services 62 Health Care and Social Assistance Ambulatory Health Care Services H6621 22 Hospitals 623 Nursing and Residential Care Facilities 624 Social Assistance Leisure and Hospitality 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation Performing Arts, Spectator Sports, and Related Industries H7711 12 Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions 713 Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries 72 Accommodation and Food Services H721 Accommodation 722 Food Services and Drinking Places Other Service 81 Other Services (except Public Administration) 811 Repair and Maintenance 812 Personal and Laundry Services 813 Religious, Grantmakinq, Civic, Professional, and Similar Organizations 814 Private Households Government/Public Sector All Government 92 Public Administration 921 Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support 922 Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities 923 Administration of Human Resource Programs 924 Administration of Environmental Quality Programs 925 Administration of Housing Programs, Urban Planning, and Community Development 926 Administration of Economic Programs 927 Space Research and Technology 928 National Security and International Affairs Source: SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS California Employment Development Department (EDD) US Census Bureau, North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), 2022 EXHIBIT 1-5b TUMF Category SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two DkR Code NAILS Three l) Cade NAILS Sk Dial Code Em b m¢nI G.M Orr¢b NAICS Cud¢ NAICS TRI¢ NAICS Cud¢ NAICS idk NAICS Code I NAICS TRI¢ Industrial Farming, Natural Resolmeb and Mining 11 A vl-Rure. Forestry. Fishing and HunHn. 111 Crop Production 111110 Sava... Farmina 111120 Oilseed (a%Ce.1 Servo ) FOnnng 111130 Dry Pea and Bean Fannin. 111140 Wheat Fannin 111150 Cam Farmina 111160 Rice Fannin. 111191 Oilseed and Groin Combination Fann- 111199 All Other Grain Fannn. 111211 Potato Fannin. 111219 Other Venetable lexcept Potatol and Melon Fo-na 111310 Oran.. Groves 111320 Citrus lexcept Cahoot Groves 111331 Apple Orchards 111332 Grape Vineyards 111333 Sin —berry Foam 1113N Berry lexcept Sin —beryl FOnal 111335 Tree Nut Farmina 111336 Fruit and had, Not Combinofion Fannin 111339 Other Nandi— Fruit Fannin. 111411 Mushroom Production 111419 Other Food Crops Grown Under Cover 111421 NurSOry and Tree Production 111422 Floriculture Production 111910 Tobacco Farnino 111920 Cotton Fannin. 111930 So .... ne Fannin. 111940 Hav Farmina 111991 Su —Beet Fannin. Peanut Foam 111992 99E All Other Miscellaneous Crop Fannin. 112 Anlmcl Praduolbn and A. —oft. 112111 Beef Cattle Ronchinn and Fannin. 112112 Cattle Feedlots 112120 Dairy Cattle and Milk Production 1121M DUOFPUrpose Cattle Ranchin. and FamYn 112210 Hon and No Fannin. 112310 Chicken E.a Production 112320 Broilers and Other Meet Type Chicken Production 1123M Turkey Production 112340 Poultry Hatcheries 1123% Other Foully Production 112410 Sheep Fannin. 1124M Goat Fannin. 112511 Fnfish Fonninn and Fish Hatcheries 112512 Shellfish Fannin 112519 01her Apuacultore 112910 Apiculture 112920 Horses and Other Eavine Reduction 1129M Fur-Beanna Animal and Rabbit Production 112990 All Other Animl Production 113 Famshv and Lagging 113110 l ndaarTract Operations 113210 Forest Nueenes and Gathenna of Forest Products 113310 I LO.nin. 114 Fishing. Hunting and Trap.l.. 114111 Fnfish Fshina 114112 Shellfish Fishin 114119 Other Merine.Fahin. 114210 Huntina and Trappin 115 Sapped A.HvHks fur Agielfil. anpmshv d F I15111 Cotton Ginnina 115112 Soil FepaTHon, Plontinn, and Cullvatinn 115113 Crop H... And, Primaniv by Machine 115114 Postharvest Crop ACIiAles lexcept Cotton Ginnin.l 115115 Farm Labor Contactors and Crew Leaders 115116 Fenn Mene.enent Services 115210 Support Activities for Animal Production 115310 Support Activities for Fareslry 21 Mining. Quap 1— and CHI and Gas Edn—(ion 211 041 and Gas EninmHOn 211120 Crude Petroleum EKhacHon 211130 Neturol Gas Fxl0Chun 212 Mining (except DII and Gas) 212114 Surface COOT Minin. 212115 Und—mund Coal Minina 212210 Iron Ore Minina 2122M Gold Ore and Silver Ore Minina 212230 Capper, Nickel, Lead, and Zinc Minin. 2122% Other Metal Ore Minin. 212311 Dimension Stone Mininn and Quaninn 212312 Crushed and Broken Limestone Minina and Quonvin 212313 Crushed and Broken Granite Mininn and Quanyian 212319 Other Crushed and Broken Stone Minin and Quamnn. 212321 Construction Sand and Gravel Minin. 212322 Industrial Sand Minina 212323 Kaolin, Clay, and CeramiC and Refractory Minerals Mininn 212390 Other Nonmetallic Mineral Minin and Quarryin 213 Sapped A.HvHbs for Mining 213111 Dnllin. Oiland Gas Wells 213112 $uppOrt Activitie3 for Oil and GOS OperOROnS 213113 1 Support Activities for Coal Minina 213114 Slrc 00 AClivitieS for Metal Minin. 213115 Support Activities for Nonmetallic Minerals fexcept Fudd Minina NMF Cdegory SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two DR111 Code NAICS Three DIgH Code 1 NAILS Six DISK Code Birplin,ment CeN oriel NAICS Code I NAICS Hie I NAICS Code I NAICS idle I NAICS Code I NAICS Hie 321 Wood Product Manotacluring 321113 Sawmills 321114 Wood Preservation 321211 Hardwood Veneer and Plywood Manofoclol 321212 SoftWeed Veneer antl Ptvwood Manufacturing 321215 Engineered Wood Member MonWoctoring 321219 Recall Wood Protloct Manufacturing 321911 Wood Window and Door Monofoclol 321912 Cot Stock, Feral Lumber, and Planing 321918 Other Millwork 1inclodinn FIOOdnnl 3219M Wood Container antl Pallet Manufoctorina 321991 Manofociored Home Nubile Hamel Manofactodna 321992 Prefabricated Wood Buildina Manofacodna 321999 All Other Miscellaneous Wood Protloct Monofactol 322 Paper MgnutacNMg 322110 Polp Mills 3221M Paper Mills 322130 Panel Mills 322211 Cortugatetl and Sold Ricer Be, Manufoctorina 322212 FOldina Papal BOx Monofocfodng 322219 Other Paperboard Container Manofactodna 322220 Paper Ban and Coated and Treated Paper Monofactol 3222M Stationery Product Manofacodng 322291 Sanitary Paper Protloci Monofocfodnn 322299 All Other Converted Paper Protluct Manufacturna 323 Printing ind R¢lot¢d Soppod A<fiNN¢E 323111 Comercial Printing (except Screen and B—ol 323113 Commmercial Screen Ninfinn 323117 1 Books Printing 323120 1 Sopped ACfivifies for Pdntinn 320 Petroleum and Cod Produch Mgnutadudng 324110 1 Petroleum Refineries 324121 1 Asphalt Paving Mix tore and Block Manufacturing 324122 Asphalt Shl le and Coale Meta l$Manolactrl 324191 Petroleum Lubricafina oil and Grease Manofoctonng 324199 1 All Other Police— and Coal Product, Manofactodna MIS Chemical Manu Wrl- 325110 Petrochemical Me ofocNnna 3251M IndusNal Gas Manufacturing 325130 Synthetic Dye and Pigment Monofoclol 3251W Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manofactodna 325193 Ethyl Alcohol Manofactodna 325194 Cvclic Cmtle, Intermediate , and Gom antl Wood Chemical M... factunna 325199 All Other Basic Omonic Chemical Manofociodnn 325211 Plastics Material antl Resin Manofactodna 325212 SvnihefiC Rubber Mormfo odnn 3252M Artificial antl Synthetic Fibers and Rohl MaNfoctonna 325311 Nltrooe— Fertilizm Manofoctol 325312 Phwahafic Fertilizer Manofactodna 325314 FertifMr IMixinn Onhl MonofOCNdna 325315 Compost Manufacturing 325320 Pesticide and Other AnriCOlfural Chemical Manofactodna 325411 Medicinal antl Botanical ManufacNnnq 325412 PhonnaCeWical Preparation Monefociol 325413 In -Vino Diagnostic Substance Manufacturing 325414 Biolonicol NOdoct lexcept Diormostic) Manofactodna 325510 Paint and Coafina Manufacturina 325520 Adhesive Manof-torinn 325611 Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturna 325612 Polish and Other Sanifatlon Good Monefactomn 325613 Surtace Acfive Agent Manofactodna 325620 Toilet Pmporotion MonofOCNnna 325910 Prinfinq Ink Manufacturna 325920 F.I sivas Man fociodnn 325991 Custom Com-ondina of Poll Resins 325992 Phoi—phis Him, Paper, Plate, Chemical, and Copy Toner Manofactodna 325998 All Other Miscellaneous Chemical Product and Preparation MaNfactunng 326 Plink. and Rubber Produch MendacNdng 326111 Plastics Be. and Pouch Manofactodna 326112 Plastics Pockal Flm and Sheet linclodinn Tamil Monofoclodnn 326113 Unlaminatetl Plastics Film and Sheet lexcept P—o-inal MaNfoctonna 326121 Unlaminafed Plastics Prefile Shope Monofactol 326122 Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fittng Manufoctonna 326130 Laminated Pestles Plate, Sheet fexceof POckoninal, and Shope MonofocNnna 326M POIvsNrene Foam Protluct Manufacll 3261X Urethane and Other Foam Prodoct except PONsfyrenel Monefacfonna 3261W Plastics Bottle Manufacturing 326191 Plastics Poll H.Iom MonofocNrina 326199 All Other Plastics Protluct Manofactodna 326211 Tin ManWOCtodnn lexcept Rafae nnl 326212 Tire Reheatling 326220 Robber Ond PIa5lics Hoses and BOldnn ManofOCtonna 326291 n Rubber Protluct Maufacturing for Mechanical Use 326299 All Other RobberPredoct Monufactol =7 Nonmetallc Minerd Product ManutacIel 327110 POhery, Ceramics, and Pembina Fxfone MonWO met 3271M Cl- Building Material and Refractories MaNfocturaa 327211 Flat Ga. Manola<todnn 327212 Other Pressed and Blown Glass antl Glassware MaNfactunna 327213 Glass Container Manof-to nn 327215 Glass Product MaNfactunna Mote of Porch asetl Glass 327310 Cement Monufoctul 3273M Ready -Mix Concrete Manufacturing 327331 Concrete Block and Brick MonufacNdnr 327332 Concrete Pipe MaNfactunna 327390 Other Concrete Protluct Manofactodna 327410 lime Manufacturna 3D420 Gypsum Noduct MonufocNrina 327910 Abrasive Product Manufactunn 327991 Cut Stone and Stone Noduct Monofoclonna 327992 Ground or Treated! Mineral antl Earth Manufacturing V7 93 Minaret Wool Monofoclonna 327999 All Other Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Protluct MaNfoctunna NMF Cdegory SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two Dl ff Code NAICS Three Dl Cotle 1 NAILS Six Dtah Cod, Em lom¢nt Cate orted NAICS Cad* I NAICS Hie I NAICS Code I NAICS idle I NAICS Code I NAICS Hie 331 Pdmary Metal Ma. "wd- 331110 Iran and Steel MiILt and FenOdIOY Manafa<ivnng 331210 Iron and Steel Pipe and Tube Ma &—nna horn Purchased Steel 331221 Rolled Steel Shope Manafa<ivnng 331222 Steel Wire Drawing 331313 Alumina Refining and Primary Alaminam Pled-tion 331314 Secondary Smelting and Alloving of Aluminum 331315 Alaminam Sheet, Plate, and Foil Monafactadng 331318 Other Aluminum Rolfr- Drawing. and Exhudina 331410 Nonfer—Metal Iaxcept Alan'invm) Smelling and Refining 3314M Cooper Rolling, Drawina, E dlina, and Allovina 331491 Nonferaw Metal (except Copper and Alaminam) Rolling. Drawing, and Fsth dine 331492 Secondary Sal Refining, and Allovino of Nonferrous Metal lexcept Copoerand Aluminum) 331511 Iron FWndries 331512 Steel Investment Foundnes 331513 Steel Foanddes lexcept lnvadmentl 331523 Nonferrous Metal Die-Castina Foundries 331524 Alaminam Foundries lexcept Die-Costingl 331529 Other Nonferrous Metal Foundries (except Die�Costina) 332 Fabricated Metal Prodvd MondIXbdng 332111 Iron antl Steel Foraing 332112 NOnienWS Forning 332114 Custom Roll Formina 332117 Powder Metoll— Pad ManafaclrHnn 332119 Metal Crown, Closure, and Other Metal St—sna lexcept Automofive) 332215 Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, COfiery, and Holware lexcept Precious) Monafoctaring 332216 Saw Blade and Hantltool ManufocWdna 332311 Prefabricated Metal 1301dinn and Component Manafo luring 332312 Fabdcated Structural Metal M.n.f.—nna 332313 Plate Work Monalach,al 332321 Metal Window and Door Manufacturina 332322 Sheet Metal Work Mandactaring 332323 Ornamental and ArchitecNral Metal Work Manufacturing 332410 Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger MOnafa<tanng 3324M Metal Tank IHeavv, Gauge) Manufacturing 332431 Metal Can ManafaclrHnn 332439 Other Metal Container Manufacurina 332510 Harchvare Manafactarinn 332613 Santa Manufacturina 332618 Other FabriGated Wire Product Manafaclarinn 332710 Machine She. 332721 Precision Tamed H'odact Monafoclarnn 332722 Bolt, Net, Sc— Rivet, and Washer Manafactadng 332811 Metal Heal Treating 33MI2 Metal Coatina.Engraving(except Jewelry and Silverwarel, and Allied Services Manufacturers 332813 Eleckoplafinn, Plafinn, Polishing, Anodizing, and Coloring 332911 Industrial VaNe ManafacWdma 332912 Fluid Power Valve and Hose Fitting Monafaclarinn 332913 Plumbing Fixture Ftfimg and Trim Manufacturina 332919 Other Metal Volve and Pipe Fitting MonufocUna 332991 Ball and Roller Been-Manafactanna 332992 Small Am Ammanhon Monafactarinn 332993 Ammunition lexcept Small Ahmt Manafactadna 332994 Small Am6, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manafaclarinn 332996 Fabricated Pipe and Pipe Ftfing Manufacturing 332999 All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Monefacaring SSS Mxhlnery Mgnufadudng 333111 Form Machine, and Equipment Manafaclanng 333112 Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and Garden Eauipment Manufacturing 333120 Conshacfion Machine, Manafaclarinn 333131 Minima Machinery and Eauipment Mcmufactunno 333132 all and Gas Feld Machinery and Equipment Monafoclaring 333241 Food Product Machinery ManufacWdna 333242 Semicandactor Machinery Manafaclarinn 333243 Sal Woodwordna. and Paper Machinery Monuf—nna 333248 All Other lndasMal Machinery Manafaclaring 333310 Commercial and Service lmdushv Machinery Monufactudna 333413 Indastdal and Commercial Fan and Blower and Air Parificafion Eauipment Mandactaring 333414 Heafing Eauipment lexcept Warm At, Pomace,) MamufacNnng 333415 Air -Conditioning and Worm Air Heal Egaipment and Commercial and Indashiol Refrigemfion Eauipment Manafa<Wnn 333511 Indastdal Mold Mamufactunna 333514 Special Die and Tod, Die Set, Jig, and F tare MonvfacWnng 333515 Cutting Tool and Machine Tool Accessory Mamuf—Tina 333517 Machine Tool Mandacarinn 333519 Rolling Mill and Other Metal Machinery Manafoctudma 333611 Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manafaclarinn 333612 Speed Cl— IntlasMal Hiah-Speed Drive, and Gear M... factunma 333613 Mechanical Power Transmission Eauipment Monufoctadna 333618 Other Engine Eauipment ManufocWdna 333912 Air and Gas Compressor Monafoctadng 333914 Measuring. Dispensima, and Other Pampina Eauipment M... foctunma 333921 Elevator and Movinn Stairway Monvfocianng 333922 Conveyor and Convevina Equipment Manafoctudma 333923 Overhead Traveling Crane, Hoist, and Monorail System Manufacturing 333924 Industrial Truck, Tractor. Trailer, and Stacker Machinery Manafactudaa 333991 Power -Driven Handtool Manufacturing 333992 Weldina and SOlderma Eauipment Manafoctanna 333993 Packoning Machinery Monafoclarinn 333994 Industrial Process Famace and Oven Manafactannq 333995 Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manafaclarinn 333996 Fluid Power Pump and Motor ManufacWdna 333998 All Other Miscellaneous General Nwose Machinery Monafaclarian SSd Corrll and 9edronlc Pradud Marr�Wfing 334111 Electronic Computer MOnafaclvring 334112 Compiler Storage Device Momuf—ma 334118 Compiler Tenond and Other COmpater Peripheral Equipment Monvfacirrinn 334210 Telephone Apparatus Manafoctadna 334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Comm,mications Eauipment Mandactaring 3342% Other Communications Eauipment Manafactanna 334310 Aad10 and Video Eauipment Monvfocianng 334412 Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufactudna 334413 Semiconductor and Related Device Manafaclaring 334416 Capacitor, Resistor, Coil, Transformer, and Other Inductor Monufactudna 334417 Electronic Connector Monafoclvrinn 334418 Printed Circuit Assembly IElecth:ml Assemblvl Manafactunmq 334419 Other Electronic Component Monufoclarinn 334510 Electromedical and Elecththerepeafic Apparatus MaNfactunma 334511 Search, Detection, Navinal Gaidonce, AeronaaliCOl, and NOOfical System and Imtmoent Mandactaring 334512 Automatic Environmental Contrd Mamvf—nna for Residential, Commercial, and Appliance Use 334513 Inslmments and Related PwdOcts Monaacarng for MCONring, Disploymn, and Co inollinn Indashiol Process Variables 334514 Totalizing Fluid Meter and Couml Device Manafoctudma 334515 Instrtent Manafoclar nn for Measannn and Tesfing Electricity and Electrical Signals 334516 Analytical Laboratory lmgmment ManafacWdna 334517 Irradiation Appeal Monafocl,mm 334519 Other Measuring and Controlling Device MaNfoctudma 334610 Monafach,al and Reproducing Marl and Optical Media NMF Category SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two Dlau Code NAICS Three DIaB Cotle 1 NAILS Six DI;u Cotle Employment COM orkd NAICS Cade I NAICS Hie I NAICS Code I NAICS idle I NAICS Code I NAICS Hie 424 Merchant Wholesalers, Nomd..M. Goads 424110 Pnn}inq Ond Writing Paper Merchant Wholesalers 4241M Stationery and Office Supplies Merchant Whdesalers 424130 Indastr101 and Personal Service Paper Merchant Wholesalers 424210 Cmas and Droa;isisSardine, Merchant Wholesalers 424310 Piece Goods, Notions, and Other Dry Goods Merchant Wholesalers 424340 Footwear Merchant Wholesalers 4243X Cloihinn and Cloihinn Accessories Merchant Wholesalers 424410 General Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers 42.20 Packaged Frozen Ecod Merchant Wholesalers 424430 Dairy Product(except Died or Cannedl Merchant Wholesalers 424440 POdhY and POOItry Prodacl Merchant Wholesalers 424450 Confectionery Merchant Wholesalers 424460 Fah and Seafood Merchant Wholesalers 424470 Meal and .at Product Merchant Wholesalers 424480 br ah kart and Vencioble Merchant Wholesalers 424 % Other Grocery and Related Products Merchant Wholesalers 424510 Grain and Feld Bean Merchant Wholesalers 4245M livestock Merchant Wholesalers 424590 Other Farm Prodacl Raw Material Merchant Wholesalers 424610 Plastics Material, and Basic Fanns and Shapes Merchant Whdesalers 424690 Other Chemical and Allied Prodocts Merchant Wholesalers 424710 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Tenninah 424720 Petroleum and Pelroleam Prodacft Merchant Wholesalers lexcept Balk Stations and Temdnaul 424810 Beer and Al. Merchant Whdesalers 424820 Wine and Distilled Alcoholic Beverage Merchant Wholesalers 424910 Farm Supplies Merchant Whdesalers 424920 Book, Periodical, and Newspaper Merchant Wholes"" 4249M Flower, Nor— Stock, and Flonsh'Su..l Merchant Wholesalers 424940 Tobacco Prodacl and Electronic Cigarette Merchant Wholesalers 424950 Paint, Vamish, antl Sopdies Merchant Wholesalers 424990 Other Miscellonews Nand—ble Goods Merchant Wholesalers 4g5 Whoksde Trade Aaenh and &okeN 4.120 1 Wholesale Trade Agents and Brokers Tmnspodallon, Warehoudna and MINI,, PR uhues u1 UNBIes 221111 HYdroelechlc Power General 221112 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation 221113 Naclear Electric Power Generation 221114 Solar Electic Power Generation 221115 Wind Electric Power Generation 221116 Geothermal Electric Power Generation 221117 Biomass Electric Power Generation 221118 Other Electric Power Generation 221121 ElecMc BOIk Power Transmission and Control 221122 Electric Power Distribution 221210 Nalaral Gas Disidbaton 221310 Water Supply and lmaation Systems 221320 Sewage Treatment Facilities 22131 Steam and Ai nditionina Supply 48-49 Transpodation and Worehoasina d81 AYTransporl 481111 Schedued Passenger Air Tmnsporlotion 481112 Scheduled ;ht Erei Ail-Trcnsporlal 481211 NOnschadaled Chartered Poesonrior Air Transportation 481212 Nonscheduled Chartered Freiaht Air Transportation 481219 1 Other NOnschadded Air Transportation 48g IhA Transpotl n 482111 lineJ1001 RaiY0ad, 482112 Short line Railroads 463 Wafer Tronspodation 483111 Deep Sea Fei;ht Trcnsearlation 483112 Deep SOO PassengerimnsportotiOn 483113 1 Coastal and Great Lakes Al Transportation 483114 Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger Tm e;oorto ., 483211 Inland Water Feiahi Tmnseartafion 483212 Inland Water POssenner Transpodation 480 Track Transportation 484110 General Freight TNckinq, LOCO1 484121 General Frei;hl Truckina,Lon;-Distance, Truckload 484122 1 General Freight TNckinq, Lonn-Distance, Less Than Truckload 484210 Used Householdand Office Goods Movina 484220 1 Specialized Freight lexcept Used Goods) TNckinq, Local 484230 Specialized Frei;ht lexcept Used Goods) Truckina, Lona-Distance 485 Tronsti and Gmand P;ssenw Tronspodotion 485111 Mhed Mode Transit SYstems 485112 COmmater Roil SYstems 485113 Buz and Other Motor Vehicle Transit Systems 485119 Other Urban Transit SYstems 485210 Interurban and Rural Bus Transportation 485310 Taxi and Ridesharing Services 485320 Unausine Service 485410 School and Employee Bos TmnsportatiOn 485510 Charter Bus Industry 485991 Special Needs TmnsportO50n 485999 All Other Transit and Ground P—maer Transportation 466 PloWine TronsporMon 486110 Pipeline transportation of Crude Oil 486210 Pipeline imnsportation of NotarOl Gas 486910 Pipeline Transportation of Renned Petroleum Produch M6990 I All Other Pipeline Transportation 489 Scenk and SlaMseelna Transporl 48]110 48J210 48]990 Scenic and Sighheeinq Transportation, Lond ni Scec and Si;hheein; Trcnsparta5on, Water Scenic and Sighiseeinq Transportation, Other 488 S—d AcflvBles tar Transpotafon 488111 Air Traffic Control 488119 Other Airport Operations 488190 Other Sopped Activities for Air Tmnsoodcton 488210 Support Activities for Rail Trcnsparlation 488310 Port and Harbor Operations 488320 Marine Caro Handlina 488330 Novi-fional Services to Shipping 4883% Other Support Activities for Water Transportation 488410 Moto' Vehicle Towing 4884% Other Support Activities for Road Transportation 488510 Feight Transportation AnOngement 488991 Packin; antl Cretin 488999 All Other So. 0 Activities for Transportation 491 Poda1 Servce 491110 Postal Service 492 C—lll and Messenam 492110 Loaners Ond Expess DeliveryServices 492210 Local Meszenaers and L-1 Delivery 493 Warehoasingand St.- 493110 Generd Warehousina and Samae 493120 Refrigerated WamhOosinq and Storage 4931M Farm Product Warehousina and Stara;e 493190 Other Worehousin and Store e TUMF Category SLAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two Diall Code NAICS Three DIOII Code NAICS Six Digit Code EmOloyment Categories NAILS Cotle NAICS title NAICS Cotle I NAICS idle NAICS Code NAICS Title 1 Rebil Trade 440.9 Reldl hale 441 Mobr Vehkle and Park, Dealers 441110 New Car Dealers 441120 Used Car Dealers 441210 Recreational Vehicle Dealers 441222 Boot Dealers 441227 Mot—cle, AN, and All Other Mote, Vehicle Dealers 441330 AutOnaSve Pads and Acce—des Retailers 441340 Tire Dealers 444 Building Mat<rR1 and Gorden EaWoment and Sal Deol@a 444110 Home Centers 444120 Paintand W011p..a, Retailers 4 1140 I Hardware Retailers —180 1 Other Building Material Dealers 4 1230 1 Outdoe, Power Equipment Retailers 444240 1 Nonary, Gordon Center, and Farm Supply Retailers 445 Food and Reveraae Relallers 446110 So—ork¢h and Omer Grocery Retailers fe eot COnv Ce Retailers) 445131 Convenience Retailers 446132 landing ..Chine Operators 445230 Fruit and Vegetable Retailers 446240 Meat Retailers 445250 Fish and Seafood Retailers 446291 Baked Goods Retailers 445292 Confectionery and Nut Retailers 445298 All Other $p¢Cialty Food Retailers 445320 Beer, Wine, antl Liquor Retailers 449 F—Hare, Hum@ Famishing0. 9ectranks, and Appian— Rebilea 449110 1 Furniture Retailers 449121 1 Floor COvanng Retailers 449122 1 Window Treatment Retailers 449129 1 All Other Home Fomishings Retailers 449210 Electronics and Appliance Retailers 455 General Merchandise Wall - Department Stares 455211 Warehouse Clubs and Super<¢ntor, 455219 1 All Other General Merchandise Retailers 456 HeoM and Personal Care Retal 456110 Pharmacies and Drua Retailers 456120 COsmo11C5, BeenN Supplies, and Perfume Retailers 456130I Optical Goods Retailers 456191 Food ft llhl Supplement Retailers 456199 All Other Heallh and Personal Care Retailers 45] Gasoline StaBons and Fael Dealers 45]110 45]120 457210 Gasoline Slations with on—nenceStane, Other Gasoline Station, Fuel Dealers 458 Clohin., CbHling A.. —ad.,, Sh— and JeweYv Retal@rs 458110 Clothing antl Clothing Accessones Retailers 458210 Shoe Retailers 458310 Jewelry Retailers 458320 WggOgeand Leather Goods Retailers 459 SpaBna Goads, Hobbv, Musical Insrument, Book and Miscellaneous Retail 459110 Spooling Goods PatOilars 4591M Hobbs, Tov, and Game Retailers 459130 Sewing, Needlework, and race Goods Retailers 459140 Musical Instrument and Supplies Retailers 459210 Book Retailers and News Dealer, 459310 Florish 459410 Office Supplies and Stationery Retailers 4594M Gift, Novelty, and Souvenir Retailers 459510 Used Merchandise Rellers 459910 Pet and Pet Supplies Retailers 459920 Art Dealers 4599M Manufactured (Mobile) Home Dealers 459991 TObaCCO, Electronic CigoroH¢, and Other Smoking Supplies Retailers 459999 All Other Miscellaneous Retailers TUMF Category SLAG RTP/SC NNAICS Two Dial, Cotle NAICS Three Wait Code NAICS Six Digit Code Employment Categories NAICS Code NAICS title NAICS Code NAICS Title NAICS Code NAICS Title Information 51 IMormaRon 512 MOBon Plcldm and Sound R@epdng Indu.bie. 512110 Motion Picture and Video Production 512120 Motion Piciam and Video DisMba,ion 512131 Motion Picture Theaters Iexcepf Drive-Insl 512132 Ddl Motion Pida2 Theaters 512191 Teleproduclion and Other Posipmduction Services 512199 Other Motion Piclare and Video IndasM¢s 5122M Music Publishers 512240 Soand Recording Sinaloa 512250 Record Production and Distribution 512290 Olhe,Soand Recording Indnshies 513 Poblkhlnp lndushies 513110 NewSpOp¢r Pablishe. 513120 Periodical Publishers 513130 Book Pabfshers 513M Directory and Maifna Lis, Publishers 513191 Goofing Card Pubfshers 513199 All Other Publishers 513210 Soflwo2 Pablishers S16 Broad—fina and Content Providers 516110 RadiOB2adCaslino St to., 516120 Television Broadcasfing Station 516210 Media St20ming Distribation Services, Social Nehvorks, and Other Media Networks and Content Providers 51] Telecommunlcallons Sl Jlll Wired Telecommunications Canters sl Jl12 Wir.1.,Tel@aommaniaafiom Carvers(except Satellite) S1J121 T¢I¢Communilclo sRes¢Iles s1J122 Agent for Wireless ielecomma cafions Services 517410 Satellite Telecommanicalions 517810 1 All Other Telecommunication 518 CompuBng Inka.buclem PwAd@N, Data ft—sinm Web Hosting, and Related Servkes 518210 Compating inhashucNre Providers, Data Proeessina, Web Hosfina, and Related Services 519 Web Search Portal Libraries, Archives, and OPoer IMormoNon SeMces 519210 libraries and Archives 519290 Web Search Portals and All Other Information Services Financial AcfMBes 52 Rnanc@ and Ins@ran<e 521 Mont-AaModBes-Cenhal Bank 521110 MonetaN Anthorif.-Central Bank 522 Credt IntormedaBon and Reheat ACBvlifes 522110 Commercial Banking 5221M Credit Unions 522180 Savings) diii flon, and Other DepoolON Credit lntenhedialon 522210 Credit Card lssaina 522220 Sales Financing 522291 Consumer Lendina 522292 Real Estate Credit 522299 International, Second— Market, and All Other Nondepository Credit Interrnediafion 522310 Morfaaae and Nonmongone Loan Brokers 5223M Financial Tmnsacdons Processina, Reserve, and Cleannahoase Acfivities 522390 OtherAclivifies Related to Credit Intermediation 523 SecerYBes. Co.l Conhacb, and 011— Rnancial I—,d nenh and Related ACMIBes 5231W nenl Banking and Secudlies lntenneaiaffon 52311 Cy,ofi Commodity Contracts Intermediation 523210 Secadfies and Comnodity Exchanges 523910 Miscellaneous Intermediation 523940 Portfolio MonOq¢m¢nl and lnveshnenl Advice 523991 Trust, Fiduciary, and Custody Activities 523999 Miscellaneous Financial lnveshnent Activities 5]A Insurance Callers and Reloled ACBHBes 524113 Direct life lnsa2nce Canters 524114 Direct Health and Medical Insurance Canters 524126 Died Property and Casualty Insarance Canters 524127 Direct Tifie Insurance Canters 524128 Other Direct l,wmnce (except Life, Hooll and Medical) Canters 5241M Reinsurance Carvers 524210 Insarance Agencies and Brokereg¢s 524291 Claims Adiusfina 524292 PhOnnaCy Benefit Management and Other Third Party Administration Of lnsa2nce and Pension Funds 524298 All Other Insurance Related Acfivities 525 Ponds, T2d., and OMer Rnonebl VehkleB 525110 Pension Funds 525120 HeMM and Wa.Nk. Fands 525190 OtheFinsurancevends 525910 Op¢n-End lnvesiment Fands 525920 Trusts, Estates, and Agency Account 525990 1 Other Financial Vehicles 53 Real El and Rend and Leming 531 Real i 531110 Lessors of Residential Buildings and Dwellinas 531120 L¢$$Ors Of Nonresidential Baildings flat Mini—ehOnses) 5311M Lessors of Mini —rehouses and Self-Sfomae Units 531190 Lessors Of Other Real Estate Property 531210 Offices of Real Estate Aaent and Brokers 531311 Residential Property Managers 531312 Nonresidential Property Manna 531320 Offices of Real Estate Apprctsers 5313% Other Activitm Related to Real Estate 532 Rental and Leasing Service. 532111 Passenger Car Rental 532112 Passenger Car Leasing 5321M Truck, Utility Trailer, and RV (Recreational Vehiclel Rental and Leasing 532210 Consumor Elechonics and Appliances Rental 532281 Faunal Wear and Co,W—Rental 532282 Video Tape and Use Rental 532283 Home Health Equipment Rental 532284 Recreational Goods Rental 532289 All Other Consumer Goods Rental 532310 General Rental Centers 532411 Commercial Air, Rail, and Water Transpar,afion Equipment Rental and Leasing 532412 Contraction, Mining, and Forestry Machinery and Egnipmenf Rental and Leasing 532420 Office Machinery and Equipment Renal and Leasing 532490 Other Commercial and IndnsM01 Machinery and Eaaipment Rental and L¢a5inq 593 Lessors of NOMinancld Inlandble Asset feacent Coavriahled Works) 533110 Lessors Of Nonfinancial Intangible Assets fezcepl COpynghled Workal TUMF Category SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two.10 Code NAICS Three DIalt Code NAILS Sk Dial Code Em to merit COM on 5 NAICS Code I NAICS TN¢ I NAICS Code I NAICS I NAICS Code I NAICS Tifle PdofeulonaI and Business Sevices 54 Professional, ScienWic, and Technical Services 541 PMeulond. SCWhi and Technical SeMces 541110 Offices of Lawyers 5,H IM Offices of Notaries 541191 Title Abstract and SeHlemenf Offices 541199 All Other Leaal Services 541211 Offices of Carffed Pablic Accoontonh 541213 Tax Preparation Services 541214 Payroll Services 541219 Other Ace ountina Services 541310 Archifecloral Services 5413M Landscape Architectural Services 541330 Enninoadnn Services 541340 Drafting Services 541350 Boildinn Inspection Services WSW Geophysical Sorvevina and M,aaina Services 5413]0 Sarveyinn and Mapping f—at GeochydcaU Services 541380 Testing Wlaaratanes and Services 541410 Interior Design Services 5414M Industrial Desian Services 541430 Graphic Design Services 5414% O1hedSaecialized Desian Services 541511 Castom COmpafer Progromming Services 541512 Computed Systems Design Services 541513 COmpuler Facilities Management Services 541519 Other Computed Related Services 541611 Administrative Me oriented and General Mananement COnadfinn Services 541612 Human Resources Consultina Services 541613 Morketinn COnsultinn Services 541614 Process, Physical Distribution, and Loaistics Consulffna Services 541618 Other Mananement COnsultinn Services 5416M Environmental Consultina Services 541690 Other Scientific and Technical Consaltinp Services 541713 Research antl Devebomenf in Nanotechnoloav 541714 Research and Development in Biotechnolonv f,eceat Nonobioiechnolonyl 541715 Research antl Devebomenf in the Physical, Enaineenna antl Life Sciences f—at Nanotechnoloav and Biofechnoloav 541720 Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Hamanities 541810 Advertisina Aaencies 541820 Pablic Relations Aaancies 541830 Media BuVha Aaencies 541840 Media Represeniafves 541850 Indoor and Outdoor Disolav Ativertisina 541860 Direct Moil Advartising 541870 Advertisina Material Distribution Services 541890 Other Services Related to Advertising 541910 Marketina Research and Public Opinion Pollina 541921 Phoionmehy $ladies, Portrait 541922 Comm cial Phofoamphv 541930 Translation and Interr/efation Services 541940 Veterinary Services 541990 AIIOIherPmfesSonal, Scientific, and Technical Services 55 Management of Companies and Enterpises 01 Management W Co—"LI antl EnMmdses 551111 Offices of Bank Holding Companies 551112 Offices Of Other HOldinn Companies 551114 Corporate, Sub did, and Regional Manaaina Offices 56 Adminishofive and Se—d and Waste Management and Remedialion Services 561 Adminlshalive and Suaaod SeMces 561110 Office Adrninishafve Services 561210 Facilities Support Services 561311 Employment Placement Agencies 561312 Executive Search Services 561320 Temporary Hela Services 5613M Professional Empbver Orders Ian, 561410 DOcament PmpOratiOn Services 561421 Telephone Answer -Services 561422 Telemarketinn Bpmaos and Other Contact Centers 561431 Private Mail Centers 561439 Other Business Service Centers fincludinn Copy Shops) 561440 Collection Aaencies 561460 Credit Bor — 561491 Repossession Services 561492 COun Reposing and Stenotype Services 561499 All Other Business Support Services 561510 Travel Anencies 5615M Tour Operators 561591 Convention and Visitors Bureaus 561599 All Other Travel Adonaemenf and Reservation Services 561611 Investinalion and Personal Background Check Services 561612 Secuniv Guard, and Patrol Services 561613 Annored Car Services 561621 Secuniv Svsfems Services(exceet Locksmithsl 561622 Locksmiths 561I10 Exterminating an Pest Control Services 561720 Janitorial Services 5617M Lands—aina Services 561740 Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Services 5617% Other Services to Buibinas and Dwellinas 561910 Pockeninn and Labefng Servi< 5619M Convention antl Trade Show Oraanizers 561990 All Other Support Services 562 W-M Management and RemedlaRon SeMces 562111 Solid Were Collection 562112 Hazardous Waste Collection 562119 Other Waste Collection 562211 Hazadtlous Waste Treatment and Disposal 562212 Solid Were Londfll 562213 Solid Waste Combuslars and Incinerators 562219 Other Nonhoc,rc-s Waste Treatment and Disposal 562910 Remetliation Services 562920 Materials Recovery Facilities 562991 Septic Tank and Related Services 562998 All Other Miscellaneous Waste Mananement Services TUMF Non -Residential iUMF Category Cate o Detailed NAICS Cones ntlence SLAG RTP/SCS NAILS Two Dtati Code NAILS Three DIaH Code NAICS Sk Dial Code Em Io m@nt Cal@ on 5 NAICS Code NAICS Till@ NAICS Code I NAICS line NAILS Code I NAILS Tate Education and Health Servkes 61 Ed@cal—I SeMeeb 611 Eoocaional Sevices 611110 Elemental and Secondary Schools 611210 Junior College, 611310 Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools 611410 Business and Secretarial Schools 611420 Computernaininn 611430 Professional and Manaaement Development Training 611511 Cosmetology and Barber Schools 611512 Flight Training 611513 Apprenticeship Training 611519 Other Technical and Trade Schools 611610 Hne Arts Schools 6116M Sports and Recreation Impaction 611630 Lanage schools 611691 Ex amnaPre gamtion and Tutonna 611692 1 Automobile Driving Schools 611699 All Other Miscellaneous Schools and lnstiuction 611710 Edacafional Sapped Services 62 Health Care and S@olel Asblance 621 AmbetaloW HeoM Care Services 621111 Offices of Phv,icians lexcept Mental Health Specialisisl 621112 Offices Of Physicians, Mental Health Specialists 621210 Offices of Dentisfs 621310 Offices of Chiropractors 6213M Offices of Oat o..fil 621330 Offices of Mental Health Practitioners f—of Physicians) 621340 Offices of Physical, Occupational and Speech Therapists, and Audiologists 621391 Offices of Podial 621399 Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners 621410 Family Planninn Centers 6214M Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers 621491 HMO Medical Centers 621492 Kidnev Dialvsi, Centers 621493 Freestanding Amball Samicol and Emergency Centers 621498 All Other Outpatient Care Centers 621511 Medical Laboratories 621512 Diagnoslic Ins-ina Centers 621610 Home Health Core Services 621910 Ambulance Services 621991 Blood and Oraon Banks 621999 All Other Miscellaneous Ambulalory Health Care Services 622 Hobpitab 622110 General Medical and Saraical Hospitals 622210 PNchiaMc and Sabshmoe Abase Hospitals 622310 1 Seecialtylf pt Psychiatric and Substance Abase)Hospitals 623 N@rsing and R@bidenRat Core PaNHieb 623110 Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nuning Facilities) 623210 Residental Intellectual and Developmen}al Disability Facilities 6232M I Residential Menial Health and Substance Abuse Facilities 623311 Confining Care Retirement Communities 623312 1 Assisted JAng Facilities for the Eldenv 623990 1 Other Residential Care Facilities 624 Soclal Asdslance 624110 Child and youth Services 6241M Services for the Ell and Persons with Disabilities 624190 Other lndividaal and Family Services 624210 CommumN Food Services 624221 Temporary Shelters 624229 Other Community Hou,ina Services 624230 Emergency and Other Relief Services 624310 Vocational RehabiHation Services 62.10 Child Care Services leisure aria Hos (fall r 91 Ads, Entertainment, and Recoolion 711 Performina Arts, Sp hct Sports, and Ill Indestrles 711110 Theater Companies and Dinner lheolen 7111M Dance Companies 711130 Musical Graa. and Arl 7111% Other Performing Ads Companies 711211 Sports Teems and Clabs 711212 Racetracks 711219 Other SeectalSocrfs 711310 Promoters of Perfarninci Ads, Seem, and Similar Events vith Facilities 711320 Promoters of Perfohninn Arts, Sports, and Similar Events vAthoat FocilNes 711410 Agents and Managers for Arl Athletes Entertainers, and Other Public Figures 711510 Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers 712 Mose@ms. Historical Sties, and Slmlar 1. lbns ]121 M ]12120 iHs= Hstorical Sites 712130 I Zoos and Botanical Gardens ]12190 Natare Parks and Other Similar lnstihl ]15 AT@b@meth, Combing, and Recreation lnda6M@B 713110 Amusement and Theme Parks 713120 Amusement Arcades 713210 Casinos lexcept Casino Hotetsl 713290 Other Gambina lndasfnes 713910 Got Courses and Country Call 713920 Saina Focifties 7139M Manna, 713940 Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers 713950 Bowling Centers 713990 All Other Amusement and Recreation hall NMF Calegay SLAG RIP/SCS NAICS Two DlaR Code I NAICS Three DlaR Code 1 NAILS Six DISK Code Em b m@nt Gate Orkb NAICSCade NAICS TRIe NAICS Code NAICSidle NAICS Code I NAICS Hie ]2 A—hah,dallon and Food Services 721 Accommodaton ]21110 Hotek (except Casino Hotelsl and Motek ]21120 Casino Hotels 721191 Bed—dl4 eakiasl Inns 721199 All Other Tel Accommodation 721211 RV IRecreational Vehicle) Parks and Campgrounds 721214 Racrootionol and Vocofion Comes (ex f Compnroundsl 721310 Rooming and Boarding Houses Doanitcries, and Warkers Camps ]22 Food S<rvk<b and DdnMna Fbaeb ]22310 Food Service Conhacton 722320 Caterers ]223M Mobile Food Services ]22410 Odnkinn Places (Alcoholic Beverapesl 722511 FellServiceRestaurants ]22513 UnlitedService Restauranis 722514 Cafeterias, Grit Buifeb, and Buffets ]22515 Snack and Nonalcoholic Beverane Bars OMe SeMce Bl OMer Servces (ez<epl W dk Admin4kaRonl all Reoolr and Maintenance 811111 General AWomotive Repair 811114 Specialized Automotive Repair 811121 Autorl Body, Paint, and Interior Repair and Maintenance 811122 Automotive Glass Replacement Shops 811191 Autorl Oil Channe and Wbdcoton Shops 811192 Car Washes 811198 All Other Automotive Repair and Maintenance 811210 Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and Maintenance 811310 Commercial and IndusMal Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance 811411 Home and Garden Equipment Repair and Maintenance 811412 Appliance Repair and Maintenance 8114M Reupholstery and Wmiture R—ir 811430 Footwear and L¢other Goods Repair 811490 Other Personaland Household Goods Repair and Maintenance 812 Personal and Laand y Servlees 812111 Barber Shops 812112 Beauty Salons 812113 Nail Salons 812191 Diet and Weinht Reducinn Centers 812199 Other Personal Care Services 812210 Foam) Homes and Funeral Services 8122M Cemeteries and Crematories 812310 COinAperated Laundries and Drycleoners 8123M Drvcleanina and Laundry Services lexcept Cd,Operoled) 812331 linen Supply 812332 Induslrlal Launderers 812910 P¢t Core lexcapl Veterinary) Services 812921 Photofnishing Laboratories (except On�Hourl 812922 1 One -Hour Phofoliolhine 8129M Parking Lob and Garages 812990 1 All Other Personal Services 813 Ill Granlhn lns, CNk, Protessianal, and SFnlor Oraankafbns 813110 Will OrnanVo on, 813211 Grantm.arre Foundations 813212 VOIOWary Hl Omanimtlore 813219 Other Grenimakina and Givina Services 813311 Human Rinhis OrnOnizofions 813312 Environment, Conservation and Wildlife Organizations 813319 Other Social Advocacy Organizations 81UIO Civic and Social Oraanizations 813910 Business Associations 8139M Professional Oraanizations 813930 Labor Unions and Similar Labor Organizations 813940 Political Organizations 813990 Other Similar OrganizaBons lexcept Business, Professional, Labor, and Political Ornanizations) 814 Private Households 814110 PrivOt¢ Households TUMF Category SCAG RTP/SCS NAICS Two II10 Code NAILS Thee rDialt Code NAICS Six DInd Code Em la merit Cofe or s NAICS Code I NAICS Title I NAICS Code I NAICS iilb I NAICS Code I NAICS Title Govemment/Pubic S Gavemment 93 P.M. AdMnl*ha 921 ExecoBve, W&WHve, and OMer General Govemment Sapaod 921110 Executive Offices 921120 Lenis101ive BOdies 9211M Public Finance Activities 921110 1 Execalive and Legislative Offices,Combined 9211 SO American Indian and Alaska Native Tnbal Governments 921190 Other General GOvemment Sappod 922 JasBce, Pablk Order, and SdeN ACHWHes 922110 Loads 922120 Police Protection M130 Lenal Coonsel and Prosecalion 922M Correctional Institutions MIX Parole Offices and Probofion Offices 9221W Fire Protection M190 Other Jasfice, PabliC Order, and Safety ACfivifies 923 AdMni*h n d Haman Resoarce hoarams 923110 923120 923130 923140 AdminishOi2 Of Edacalion Programs Atlminisfrat!on of Public Health Pmarams AdminishOfion Of Haman Ree,a Ce Programs f—et EdacafiOn, PabliC Health, and Veterans' Affairs Pronramsl Atlminisfration of Veterans Affairs 924 Adminisha ion of Environmental OodHy Pmgmms 924110 Atlminisfration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management I'marans 924120 1 Adminishalion Of ConservafiOn Programs 925 Adminlshalbn of Hoadna ho>ams. Urban Hannina, and CommanHv Devebtxnenl 925110 Adminishalion Of HOasing Ragroms 925120 Atlminisfration of Urban PI.nnind and CommuniN and Rural Development 926 Adminisho8on of Economic Programs 926110 Atlminisfration of General Economic Programs 926120 1 RegVIOHOn and AdminishafiOn Of Trarep CHOtiOn Programs 926130 Regulation antl Atlminishaton of Comrtvnicafions, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities 926140 RegalOHOn Of Agricallarol Morkefinn and COnvradifies 926150 Reaulaton, Licensing, and Inspecfion of Miscellaneous Commercial Sectors 927 Saoce Research and Technology 927110 Space Research and Technology 928 Noliond S—My and Inte—Sonol Mdre 928110 National SecunN 928120 Inlemafional Affairs Califon a Employment Development Department IEDDI US Censers Bamao, Nodh Amencon Indasfn Classification System INAICSI. 2022 Appendix C - Western Riverside County Traffic Growth 2018 - 2045 Existing (2018) and future (2045) traffic data were derived from RivCoM. The model area of coverage, level of roadway network and TAZ detail, and application on other regional transportation study efforts represented RivCoM as the appropriate tool for evaluating traffic growth as part of the Nexus Study. The forecasts of existing and future congestion levels were derived from the Year 2018 Existing and Year 2045 No -Build scenarios, respectively. The 2018 Existing and 2045 No - Build scenarios were developed using RivCoM to model 2018 and 2045 SED, respectively, as derived from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS adopted SED forecasts, on the transportation network as it existed in 2021. The 2018 existing transportation network represents the most recent baseline network developed for RivCoM, and only reflects the inclusion of those projects that were funded, committed and under construction at that time, and therefore imminently to be part of the baseline transportation system in 2018. For the purposes of the TUMF network analysis, additional improvements on the TUMF arterial highway network that were either completed or under construction in the period between 2018 and December 2021 were added to the network to create a 2021 existing network. The 2021 existing network was subsequently modeled in RivCoM using both 2018 and 2045 SED to provide the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No -Build scenarios as the basis for comparison and analysis. The 2045 No -Build scenario did not include transportation improvements that are planned as part of the recently adopted SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS on the basis they are uncommitted (meaning that their implementation is dependent on securing future funding and approval). Inclusion of the uncommitted improvements masks the congestion effects of increasing travel. Inclusion of these improvements and the resultant masking is not appropriate for this analysis aimed at identifying the effects of increasing travel if improvements were not built. The WRCOG TUMF study area was extracted from RivCoM for the purpose of calculating the following measures for Western Riverside County only. Traffic growth impacts for each of the two scenarios were calculated using the TransCAD platform. ➢ Total daily vehicle miles of travel (VMT), ➢ Total daily VMT on facilities experiencing LOSE or worse. ➢ Total daily vehicle hours of travel (VHT), and ➢ Total combined daily vehicle hours of delay (VHD) The following formulas were used to calculate the respective values. ➢ VMT = Link Distance * Total Daily Volume ➢ VHT = Average Loaded (Congested) Link Travel Time * Total Daily Volume ➢ V H D = VHT - (Free -flow (Uncongested) Link Travel Time* Total Daily Volume) ➢ VMT LOSE or F = VMT (on links where Daily V/C exceeded 0.90)13 13 LOS Thresholds for LOS E are based on the 2010 Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010) LOS Maximum V/C Criteria for Multilane Highways with 45 mph Free Flow Speed (Exhibit 14-5, Chapter 14, Page 14-5). WRCOG C-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 RivCoM breaks down its roadway network into functional categories called assignment groups. The measures were calculated selectively for all facilities, freeways only, arterials only, and TUMF arterials only by including and excluding different assignment groups and facilities. For the calculation of measures on "all facilities", only the centroid connectors were excluded. Arterial values excluded all mixed -flow to carpool lane connector ramps, freeways, carpool lanes, centroid connectors, and freeway -to - freeway connector ramps, respectively. Freeways were defined as including mixed - flow to carpool lane connector ramps, freeways, carpool lanes, and freeway -to - freeway connector ramps, respectively. The 2021 Existing Network by Facility Type is included in this Appendix as Exhibit C-1. The 2021 existing network was used as the basis for the 2018 Existing and 2045 No -Build scenarios by modeling 2018 and 2045 SED, respectively, on the 2021 existing network using RivCoM to determine the comparative effects of population, household an employment growth in the region. The results of the analysis of existing and future congestion levels are presented for peak periods in Exhibit C-2 and for daily in Exhibit C- 3 in this Appendix and extracted for the combined peak periods in Table 3.1 of the study report. WRCOG C-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 QO a ST \ _ OAN NYON RD W U LNE O — NA tPOR 9 µEON SA/V Tl Y VERSIT A TEO CAN ON ARTIN LUTHER KI BLVD i O <AKF z G IRONW j� F -- I(VA CA ARLINGT�V _ O PEE PPJ� N EUCALY�L — �PCO� p O C" -- EALESSANDROB D C C BLVD m E1 W EYS A O OAS WESTWARD AVE O E O m P _ > R Z o m po JO Q2 5 _ O _ AM ST _ HA V S p O m Q L i \ \ STATE WAY 79 Z o � O kpy m PO ¢ W 2 2 ¢ p 9 O O o� E� 0 O T SM W F \�Q PAS RD F �P o CALIF h O D 5� 0 G 0 ENM+oN� P O �O Oy 0 � 0 c PO e O O S O. 1 9 GPI U RD S MGS RD I Source: Riv OM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network completed by WRCOG and GHD, EXHIBIT C-1 Western Riverside County 2021 Existing Network Facility Type LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Existing Facility Type TUMF Arterials NonTUMF Arterials Freeways 0 3 6 9 Miles EXHIBIT C-2 Western Riverside County Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 - 2045) - Peak Periods Measures of Performance AM Peak PM Peak 2018 2045 % Change % Annual 2018 2045 % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 10,324,900 13,225,039 28% 0.9% 12,959,824 16,672,215 29% 0.9% VMT - FREEWAYS 5,877,972 6,720,682 14% 0.5% 7,636,550 8,769,602 15% 0.5% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 4,446,928 6,504,357 46% 1.4% 5,323,274 7,902,613 48% 1.5% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 2,793,846 3,826,810 37% 1.2% 3,423,139 4,770,390 39% 1.2% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 251,133 435,243 73% 2.1% 290,218 480,196 65% 1.9% VHT - FREEWAYS 120,257 186,102 55% 1.6% 143,535 213,027 48% 1.5% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 130,875 249,142 90% 2.4% 146,683 267,169 82% 2.2% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 81,578 154,106 89% 2.4% 92,877 166,763 80% 2.2% VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 57,989 177,814 207% 4.2% 50,911 160,242 215% 4.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 34,221 86,616 153% 3.5% 31,935 84,033 163% 3.6% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 23,768 91,198 284% 5.1% 18,977 76,209 302% 5.3% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 18,024 66,789 271 % 5.0% 15,225 58,074 281 % 5.1 % VMT LOS E & F - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 2,960,551 6,364,419 1 15% 2.9% 2,644,519 7,005,063 165% 3.7% VMT LOS E & F - FREEWAYS 2,435,804 4,276,258 76% 2.1 % 2,289,667 5,040,633 120% 3.0% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 524,747 2,088,161 298% 5.2% 354,852 1,964,430 454% 6.5% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E & F 448,168 1,585,571 254% 4.8% 317,614 1,598,561 403% 6.2% of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E & F 16% 41 % 970 347o * Based on RivCoM 2018 network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network completed. NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast travel time and free -flow (ideal) travel time) LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined byV/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County General Plan. WRCOG C-4 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT C-3 Western Riverside County Regional Highway System Measures of Performance (2018 - 2045) - Daily Measures of Performance Peak Periods Total Dail 2018 2045 % Change % Annual 2018 2045 % Change % Annual VMT - Total ALL FACILITIES 23,284,724 29,897,254 28% 0.9% 41,378,907 53,832,389 30% 1.0% VMT - FREEWAYS 13,514,522 15,490,284 15% 0.5% 24,642,357 29,200,582 18% 0.6% VMT - ALL ARTERIALS 9,770,202 14,406,970 47% 1.4% 16,736,551 24,631,807 47% 1.4% TOTAL - TUMF ARTERIAL VMT 6,216,985 8,597,200 38% 1.2% 10,794,415 15,170,125 41 % 1.3% VHT - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 541,350 915,439 69% 2.0% 893,813 1,433,458 60% 1.8% VHT- FREEWAYS 263,792 399,128 51% 1.5% 440,073 637,990 45% 1.4% VHT - ALL ARTERIALS 277,558 516,311 86% 2.3% 453,740 795,469 75% 2.1 % TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHT 174,455 320,869 84% 2.3% 285,520 496,757 74% 2.1 % VHD - TOTAL ALL FACILITIES 108,900 338,056 210% 4.3% 131,965 410,511 21 1 % 4.3% VHD - FREEWAYS 66,156 170,649 158% 3.6% 79,532 208,287 162% 3.6% VHD - ALL ARTERIALS 42,745 167,407 292% 5.2% 52,434 202,223 286% 5.1 % TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VHD 33,249 124,863 276% 5.0% 41,025 152,200 271 % 5.0% VMTLOSE- TOTALALLFACILITIES 5,605,070 13,369,483 139% 3.3% 6,153,146 16,090,205 161% 3.6% VMT LOS E - FREEWAYS 4,725,471 9,316,891 97% 2.5% 5,141,215 11,306,348 120% 3.0% VMT LOS E & F - ALL ARTERIALS 879,599 4,052,592 361 % 5.8% 1,01 1,931 4,783,858 373% 5.9% TOTAL TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 765,782 3,184,133 316% 5.4% 878,465 3,819,635 335% 5.6% % of TUMF ARTERIAL VMT w/ LOS E or worse 127c 3776 87o 25% * Based on RivCoM 2018 network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS SED with updated 2021 arterial network completed. NOTES: Volume is adjusted by PCE factor VMT = vehicle miles of travel (the total combined distance that all vehicles travel on the system) VHT = vehicle hours of travel (the total combined time that all vehicles are traveling on the system) VHD = vehicle hours of delay (the total combined time that all vehicles have been delayed on the system based on the difference between forecast trc LOS = level of service (based on forecast volume to capacity ratios). LOS E or Worse was determined by V/C ratio that exceeds 0.9 thresholds as indicated in the Riverside County Gener< WRCOG C-5 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Appendix D - Western Riverside County Bus Transit System Ridership 2023 - 2045 Actual average weekday daily ridership for Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) transit bus services was tabulated for 2023. Forecast average weekday daily ridership for RTA bus transit services was retrieved from the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model for horizon year 2045. The bus transit ridership for 2023 and 2045 was tabulated to represent existing and future regional bus transit trips consistent with the analysis of highway trips described in Section 3.1 and Appendix C. Table D-1 summarizes the weekday bus transit ridership in Western Riverside County. TABLE D-1 - Regional Bus Transit Weekday System Ridership Western Riverside Year Weekday Projected System Ridership 2023* 16,575 2045** 57,282 Notes: * - 2023 actual average weekday daily ridership provided by RTA staff December 1, 2023 ** - 2045 forecast average weekday daily ridership obtained from SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model as provided by Fehr and Peers, November 28, 2023 WRCOG D-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Appendix E - Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials Performance Measures An integral element of the Nexus Study is the designation of the Western Riverside County Regional System of Highways and Arterials (also referred to as the "TUMF Network"). This network of regionally significant highways represents those arterial and collector highway and roadway facilities that primarily support inter -community trips in Western Riverside County and supplement the regional freeway system, and represents the extents of the network of highways and roadways that would be eligible for TUMF funded improvements. The Regional System of Highways and Arterials does NOT include the freeways of Western Riverside County which primarily serve inter -regional trips. The designation of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in the original TUMF Nexus Study adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in October 2002 was initiated with the identification of highways and roadways that met certain specified guidelines as defined by the WRCOG Public Works Committee. The guidelines are defined in Section 4.1 of the Nexus Report, and include: 1. Arterial highway facilities proposed to have a minimum of four lanes at future buildout (not including freeways). 2. Facilities that serve multiple jurisdictions and/or provide connectivity between communities both within and adjoining Western Riverside County. 3. Facilities with forecast traffic volumes in excess of 20,000 vehicles per day in the future horizon year. 4. Facilities with forecast volume to capacity ratio of 0.90 (LOS E) or greater in the future horizon year. 5. Facilities that accommodate regional fixed route transit services. 6. Facilities that provide direct access to major commercial, industrial, institutional, recreational or tourist activity centers, and multi -modal transportation facilities (such as airports, railway terminals and transit centers). The original candidate facilities were identified by overlaying various transportation system and land use plots depicting parameters consistent with those defined by the specified guidelines. These plots included existing and proposed numbers of lanes, network volumes and volume to capacity ratio (LOS) derived from SCAG CTP Model networks developed by Transcore to support the ongoing Western Riverside County CETAP study, and existing land use information provided by SCAG. These plots were included in the Appendices that accompanied the original 2002 TUMF Nexus Study. Fixed route transit service information was provided by the Riverside County Regional Transportation Authority (RTA). These various data inputs were overlaid and reviewed leading the definition of a segmented skeletal network of highways and roadways for further consideration. The skeletal network was further enhanced to reflect regional connectivity and access to activity center considerations. An initial draft Regional System of Highways and Arterials was developed and subsequently distributed to the County of Riverside and each City in Western Riverside County for review in the context of their respective City General WRCOG E-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Plan Circulation Elements, primarily to confirm existing and future number of lanes and appropriateness of the facilities identified. The initial draft network was subsequently revised to consolidate appropriate General Plan Circulation Elements, including the identification of proposed new facilities as alternatives to existing facilities. It should be pointed out that the Regional System of Highways and Arterials does not represent a simple compilation of regional General Plan Circulation Elements, but rather incorporates the elements of regional General Plan Circulation Elements that are necessary for mitigating the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development within the horizon year of the TUMF program. The consolidated list of proposed network improvements (along with associated initial cost estimates) was subsequently distributed to each of the WRCOG jurisdictions, individual landowners, and other stakeholders including representatives of the development community through the Building Industry Association (BIA) for review. The review of the consolidated list of improvements (and associated costs) prompted a series of five peer review workshop meetings to specifically review each segment of roadway identified and the associated improvements to mitigate the traffic impacts of new development. One peer review workshop meeting was held for each of the five zones in the WRCOG region with meetings held at the Riverside County Assessor's Office between June 27, 2002 and July 18, 2002. The peer review workshop meetings involved representatives from WRCOG, the respective zone jurisdictions and the BIA. The peer review workshops culminated in the development (by consensus of the groups) of a revised list of proposed network improvements (and associated costs) more accurately reflecting the improvements necessary to mitigate the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development. Following the peer review, the initial Regional System of Highways and Arterials was reviewed and endorsed by the TUMF Technical Advisory Committee, the TUMF Policy Committee and the WRCOG Executive Committee and utilized as the basis for developing the original TUMF Nexus Study in October 2002. For the 2024 update of the TUMF Nexus Study, the Regional System of Highways and Arterials was reassessed. Consistent with the changing rate of new development forecast for Western Riverside County as part of the SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS, including reductions in the overall level of non-residential employment, the review of the TUMF Network as part of the 2024 Nexus Update ensured facilities generally still met the previously described performance guidelines, and/or that the scope and magnitude of specific improvements to the TUMF Network were roughly proportional to the impacts needing to be mitigated. This review process involved the comparison of model outputs for the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No -Build Scenarios on the 2021 Existing arterial network to identify those facilities no longer expected to be impacted substantially by the cumulative effects of traffic growth from new development. This review resulted in various changes in the scope and magnitude of specific improvements previously identified on the TUMF Network. The updated model output plots utilized as the basis for the latest network review are included in this appendix as Exhibit E-1 through E-8. The Regional System of Highways and Arterials is included as Figure 4.1 in the Nexus Study report. WRCOG E-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 I" DDs` 1z 2D �D o ST r M BLVD D D GVO L •yDD�';'J D I � C O � �AO z tiR O RKHAM ST f C O Yy Dy i r1 m 20 0 1,V YON RD WCO�y UNE RD LAVE 0 POft RED" SA o,� a ZED DAN IV RD y VALLEY BLVk. O O 2 W Y O � LVD / E "MWEIgk,2% PO RD L RD JGB RD A O Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network completed by WRCOG and GHD, 2023 oi W WI6c 6-*T 9 �E RAMSEY ST - D N L E WESTWARD AVE Z - AO EXHIBIT E-1 Western Riverside County 2021 Existing Network Number of Lanes N W-�— E s LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Existing Number of Lanes (Directional) 1 lane — 2 lanes — 3+ lanes 0 3.3 6.7 10 Miles ,^n MAl CEN � uIOU a OR _ S BLVD GG ALESSAI L ` c a Z 0 K� I Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2018 base year SED EXHIBIT E-2 Wcoo Western Riverside County r 2018 Existing Conditions Scenario a u O iiFY BLVD L., WW Average Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) f\j YZI 14TH 5`Tk LAllfy pKWY O y yz �P z oN sT _ N 1 4 m E1, TST a FSr OqF E VE P •_-- — WE 0 Rti J� m� p0 O`er 2� OP s� R STATE WAY 79 qM ipy Q W \ h u`- 2 O R �o wF F CALIF EN\GONE LEGEND �. TUMF ZONE _ \ Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Average Daily Traffic (ADT) <10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-30,000 /// 30,000-50,000 50,000+ 0 3 6 9 Miles \ 2ND$T _ 1ST ST 2� L� �r YUMADR 1 RAILROAD Si pJ 11 YO F- RRD °Q- GREEN RNE JQ' W67HST Y E6T ST r � h E FOOTHILL pKy �RO q�F A� SOR DOS AGO r° y CENTER ST BUFa RSTQq�F S�3RD ST UN IVERSITY AVE_ 11A1 LUTHE1 SLVD CF,vT� t- ARLINGTON AVE G O IRC ¢ O w � AL F��nninan aI yin I � L) O ~ MA$KHJ@M ST o I 9 T °�S 0 gOSoil, 9LF. . vyi 9LF I._. S o�LF Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2018 base year SED �G WILWila"Y BLVD i w 9 EXHIBIT E-3 Western Riverside County 2018 Existing Conditions Scenario Level of Service (LOS) N W E LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Peak Period LOS LOS A or B LOS C or D LOS E or F 0 3 6 9 Miles 1Z SS/ BNB.. Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2045 horizon year SED EXHIBIT E-4 Western Riverside County 2045 Future No -Build Scenario ige Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) N W_A_E s \ LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Average Daily Traffic (ADT) <10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-30,000 30,000-50,000 50,000+ 0 3 6 9 Miles \ O ND�T ST ST 2 IF YUALA DRY RAILROAD ST P GREEN RNER RD �00 w6iH Si O E 6TH ST � GP5 9 ? � s H'F, 3RDLT I UNIVERSITY AV% MAKl N LUTHE G SLVD CFNT r \ RA<F�F • . ��� ARfjIJGTON AVM G O G E r �E PJ �ALFCCONna AI VD M $SST Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2021 existing TUMF network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2045 horizon year SED I w W II .C(1N ST EXHIBIT E-5 Western Riverside County 2045 Future No -Build Scenario Level of Service (LOS) N W_�_E S LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Peak Period LOS LOS A or B LOS C or D LOS E or F 0 3 6 9 Miles O EXHIBIT E-6 Ziverside County F Build Scenario Slumber of Lanes LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto isting Number of Lanes (Directional) 1 lane 2 lanes 3+ lanes 0 3.3 6.7 10 Miles a` o P � D1gg PO sz m� 0 Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2045 recommended TUMF build network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2045 horizon year SED EXHIBIT E-7 Western Riverside County ,5 Future TUMF Build Scenario ige Daily Traffic Volume (ADT) N W-�— E s LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Average Daily Traffic (ADT) <10,000 10,000-20,000 20,000-30,000 30,000-50,000 50,000+ 0 3 6 9 Miles \ O 2NDjT 1ST ST 2� VUMADR , RP�LROAD ST PO Z�� / � s Gg-E RNER Ro �0 W6THST E 6TH ST T � s C \-A CENTE, ST Source: RivCOM 2018 base network with updated 2045 recommended TUMF build network and SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS 2045 horizon year SED EXHIBIT E-8 Nestern Riverside County ture TUMF Build Scenario Level of Service (LOS) N W-�—E s LEGEND TUMF ZONE Northwest Central Pass Southwest Hemet/San Jacinto Peak Period LOS LOS A or B LOS C or D LOS E or F 0 3 6 9 Miles Appendix F - TUMF Network Cost Assumptions The TUMF program was established as a uniform impact fee program that is applied to mitigate the cumulative transportation impacts of new development on the regional arterial highway system. In establishing the technical basis for TUMF, like any impact fee program, there are two fundamental requirements that must be addressed: establishing a rational nexus for the program; and determining that any fee is roughly proportional to the impact of a proposed development. These requirements are rooted in two well- known legal cases: Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987) 483 U.S. 825; and Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994) 512 U.S. 374. To establish project costs that meet the rough proportionality test for an expansive network of facilities, WRCOG utilizes a conceptual planning level project and cost estimation approach based on typical unit costs for a variety of project types and conditions. These unit costs are intended to reflect a range of values that are typical for the types of projects that are necessary to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development. These unit costs are developed for each typical project type based on actual observed values for the various materials, labor and right-of-way that would typically be required to complete a project. Although the actual materials, labor, right-of-way and associate costs to complete each specific project can be expected to vary based on the particular conditions of each site and project requirements at the time the project is actually implemented, the approach of using typical unit costs as the basis for the TUMF program represents a manageable and appropriate level of detail to establish conceptual project cost estimates that meet the requirement for rough proportionality. The application of typical unit costs and the associated identification of a maximum TUMF share for each eligible project also provides a framework that protects the program from projects with actual costs that vary significantly from the typical cost estimates used as the program basis. The TUMF program administrative polices limit reimbursement of costs associated with eligible TUMF projects to the lesser of maximum TUMF share identified in the Nexus Study or the actual eligible project costs. In this manner, projects that are completed by participating jurisdictions or developers for less than the maximum TUMF share are reimbursed (or credited) for the actual amount expended, while projects that exceed the maximum TUMF share are only reimbursed (or credited) by the program up to the maximum TUMF share value ensuring that the program is mitigating impacts at a level that is roughly proportional to that typically expected, and is not subject to extreme project costs to address unusual or exceptional local conditions or requirements. For the purposes of TUMF, unit cost values were developed for various eligible improvement types that all provide additional capacity needed to mitigate the cumulative regional traffic impacts of new development to facilities on the TUMF Network. Eligible improvement types include: 1. Construction of additional Network roadway lanes; 2. Construction of new Network roadway segments; 3. Expansion of existing Network bridge structures; WRCOG F-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 4. Construction of new Network bridge structures; 5. Expansion of existing Network interchanges with freeways; 6. Construction of new Network interchanges with freeways; 7. Grade separation of existing Network at -grade railroad crossings; 8. Expansion of existing Network -to -Network intersections; 9. Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) of Network roadway segments. Because roadway improvement standards vary considerably between respective jurisdictions, a typical roadway standard for the TUMF Network was recommended by the Public Works Committee (PWC) during the development of the original TUMF Nexus Study adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee in October 2002 as the basis for developing the TUMF Network cost estimate. The typical roadway standard assumes the following design characteristics that are consistent with the minimum requirements of the Caltrans Highway Design Manual: ➢ Asphalt concrete pavement and appropriate base material to accomplish up to 12 feet per travel lane plus up to four feet for ancillary treatments (e.g. shoulders, or Class II Bike Lane); ➢ Concrete curb and gutter and associated drainage (e.g. paved roadway shoulders and/or open swale); ➢ Storm drains located within curb to curb, and associated transverse portions perpendicular to the roadway and adjoining portions longitudinal to the roadway; ➢ 14 foot paved and painted median (or dual center left turn lane); ➢ Traffic signals at intersections with state highways and other major arterials that are also on the TUMF Network; ➢ Pavement striping and roadway signing, as required; ➢ 6 foot wide concrete sidewalks and associated curb cuts for ADA access at street crossings. A cross-section of the Typical Roadway Standard is illustrated in Figure F-1. Figure F-1. Typical Roadway Standard Cross -Section 6' 4' 12' 12' 14' 12' 12, 4' 6' (Sidewalk 6,c Lane Roadway Lanes Painted. Median It is recognized that the typical roadway standard is not appropriate in all potential TUMF Network locations. Where appropriate, typical design standards could be substituted with design elements such as open swale drainage and paved roadway shoulders with no curbing that would typically cost less than the implementation of the WRCOG F-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Typical Roadway Standard. Roadway improvements in excess of the Typical Roadway Standard include, but are not limited to: ➢ Portland concrete cement pavement or other aesthetic pavement types (except at intersections); ➢ Major rehabilitation or overlay of existing pavement in adjacent roadway lanes; ➢ Raised barrier medians; ➢ Parking lanes; ➢ Roadway tapers outside the extents of the approved project ➢ Sanitary sewage infrastructure; ➢ Water systems ➢ Dry utilities ➢ Undergrounding infrastructure ➢ Relocation of non -prior rights utilities ➢ Storm Drain Systems in excess of draining the roadway ➢ Landscaping; ➢ Streetlighting; ➢ Class I Bike Lanes (e.g. separate bicycle paths) ➢ Environmental Permitting ➢ Detection/Retention Basins outside of Street Right -of -Way ➢ Agency Staff time in excess of 15% of Engineering ➢ Agency Staff Time in excess of 15% of Construction These improvements in excess of Typical Roadway Standards are not eligible for TUMF funding and will be the responsibility of the local funding agency. Unit cost estimates for the implementation of TUMF Network improvements were developed based on the unit cost to accomplish the Typical Roadway Standard. Initial unit cost estimates were developed as part of the original TUMF Nexus in 2002. These original values were adjusted as part of the 2005 Nexus Update to reflect changes in cost based on relevant indices. The unit cost estimates were fully revised as part of the 2009 Nexus Update to capture the full effects of the economic recession on the costs of labor, materials and property acquisition. For the previous 2016 Nexus Update, the unit costs were fully revised. The 2016 Nexus Update reflected the effects of the ongoing recovery from the economic recession that has saw the costs of materials, labor and land acquisition in California rebound from relative historical lows previously observed at the time of the 2009 Nexus Update. For the 2024 Nexus Update, the unit costs were again fully revised to generate entirely new unit cost values based on the most recent available construction cost, labor cost and land acquisition cost values for comparable projects within and adjacent to Riverside County. The recalculation of the TUMF unit cost components was completed as part of the 2024 Nexus Update to account for the unprecedented materials cost increases, labor shortages and high rate of inflation generally attributable to a combination of the disruption to global supply chains caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and additional tariffs on a range of products imported into the United States. In December 2023, the unit cost values were validated utilizing Caltrans Contract Cost Data and the resultant unit costs are noted in Exhibit F-2 and summarized in Table 4.1. WRCOG F-3 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 For simplicity, the roadway unit cost was assumed to provide for the full depth construction (including grading) of 16 feet of new pavement per lane (to accommodate a minimum 12 foot lane and ancillary treatments). The unit cost was assumed to include the following construction elements: ➢ Sawcut of existing pavement ➢ Removal of existing pavement ➢ Roadway excavation and embankment ➢ 10" thick class 2 aggregate base ➢ 4.0" thick asphaltic concrete surface ➢ Concrete curb, gutter and drainage improvements Roadway unit costs were determined for each unique cost item. The source used to determine the roadway unit costs as part of the 2024 Nexus Update are listed below. ➢ Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021-2022 ➢ Projects within Riverside County and Adjacent Counties ➢ Typical experience for local cities, Western Riverside County ➢ Michael Baker international (MBI), Structural Group ➢ MBI, ITS Group ➢ Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022-2023 All data described above was initially obtained in October 2022 and refreshed and validated in December 2023. Right-of-way acquisition costs were determined based on the cost to acquire 18 feet of right-of-way per lane of new roadway improvement. For urban and suburban land use areas, the amount of right-of-way to be acquired as part of the TUMF program was reduced by 75% to account for property already owned by a participating jurisdiction through prior acquisition or dedication. Right-of-way unit costs were assumed to include the following elements: ➢ Land acquisition ➢ Documentation and legal fees ➢ Relocation and demolition costs and condemnation compensation requirements ➢ Utility relocation ➢ Direct environmental mitigation Right-of-way unit costs were determined based on a review of actual property sales within the WRCOG region during the prior 18 month period. The task of determining the valuation per square foot of right-of-way for different land uses was completed by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. A typical existing condition of each component type was used as a guideline for quantity assessments. ➢Terrain 1: Level terrain with 0% profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile. ➢Terrain 2: Rolling Terrain with 1.5 % profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile. WRCOG F-4 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ➢Terrain 3: Mountainous Terrain with 3% profile grade. Construction cost is per lane mile. ➢Land Use 1, 2 and 3; ROW cost factor per lane mile, for Urban, Suburban and Rural areas respectively. ➢Interchange 1: Complex New Interchange/Interchange Modification. Existing complex interchange at 1-15 & SR-91 was used as a guideline for quantity assessments. ➢Interchange 2: New Interchange/Interchange Modification is assumed to be a New Cloverleaf Interchange consisting of 4 (3 lane) direct ramps and 4 (2 lane) loop ramps. ➢Interchange 3: Major Interchange Improvement is assumed to correspond to adding 1 lane to each ramp on a cloverleaf Interchange. ➢Bridge: New Bridge cost. Construction cost is per linear foot per lane. ➢RRXing 1: New Rail Grade Crossing. Construction cost is per lane per crossing. ➢RRXing 2: Widening Existing Grade Crossing. Construction cost is per lane per crossing. ➢ITS 1: Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on TUMF Network roadway segments per route mile The cost estimating methodology here is intended to provide a Present Value Cost Estimate for the WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee based on year 2023 unit prices. A more detailed description of cost categories is detailed below. I. Roadway Items Roadway Excavation: A unit cost of $38.55 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data) is applied to account for the excavation quantities. Assuming proposed profiles to be at Oho grade, the excavation values are estimated based on the component type as follows: ➢ Terrain 2 and 3: excavation for one lane (16 feet wide and 4 feet deep) is assumed. Imported Borrow: The unit cost used for imported borrow is $20.47 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). Locations where imported borrow is required are determined from aerial photos. ➢ Terrain 2 and 3: Excavation for one lane (16 feet wide and 4 feet deep) is assumed. ➢ Interchanges 1, 2, and 3: Vertical clearance of 24.5 feet is used to calculate the maximum amount of imported borrow at areas adjacent to an undercrossing. ➢ RRXing 1 and 2: Vertical clearance of 31.5 feet and Bridge approach of 1,000 feet is used to determine the quantity of Imported borrow for this component type. Clearing and Grubbing: The unit cost for clearing and grubbing is $12,100.00 per acre (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). WRCOG F-5 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 ➢ Terrain 1, 2 and 3: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 16 feet for the addition of each new lane. ➢ Interchange 1 and 2: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 40 feet beyond the proposed outside edge of shoulder. The clearing and grubbing width varies depending on the number of added lanes. ➢ Interchange 3 and Intersection: The area of clearing and grubbing is assumed to extend 16 feet for the addition of each lane. Development of Water Supply: A lump sum value is used to account for developing water supply. The lump sum cost is estimated as 10% of the combined cost for roadway excavation and imported borrow (Source: RCTC). PCC Pavement: The unit cost for PCC pavement is $354.83 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). ➢ Terrain 1, 2 and 3: It is assumed that PCC is used at mainline shoulders. The PCC shoulder pavement is assumed to be 4 inch thick and 4 feet wide. Asphalt Concrete Type A: It is assumed that Asphalt Concrete is used at mainline and where ramp and bridge widening is required. A unit cost of $240.62 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data) is used to account for asphalt concrete quantities. The asphalt concrete overlay is assumed to be 4 inch thick. Aggregate Base: The unit cost for aggregate base is $73.54 per cubic yard (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). Aggregate base quantities are estimated by means of calculating the areas of additional lanes. The aggregate base layer is considered to be 10 inch thick. It is assumed that aggregate base is used over the entire widening width below the PCC pavement and asphalt concrete layers. Curb and Gutter: The unit cost used for curb and gutter is $65.74 per linear foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). It is assumed that type A2-6 curb and gutter is used on the entire length of travel way where required. Project Drainage: A lump sum value is used to account for project drainage cost of roadway construction. The project drainage cost is estimated as 15% (Source: RCTC project 2007) of combined cost for earthwork and pavement structural section. Traffic Signals: The costs for traffic signals are calculated per ramp termini intersection. The unit cost used for traffic signals is $531,086 (Source: Caltrans Contract Cost Data and typical experience, Western Riverside County) per intersection. Traffic signals costs are considered only at the Intersection (Network -to -Network) upgrade. WRCOG F-6 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Striping: The unit cost used for Striping is $2.58 per linear foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). It is assumed that two lines of thermo-plastic striping are required for every lane addition. Marking: The unit cost used for marking is $7.31 per square foot (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). ➢ Terrains 1, 2 and 3: It is assumed that there are 8 arrow markers, 2 Stop sign markers and 4 Bike sign markers. ➢ Interchanges 1, 2, and 3: It is assumed that there are 2 Type I arrows on each on ramp, and 2 Type IV (L) arrows on each off ramp. ➢ Intersection (network to network) upgrade: It is assumed that there are 2 right turn arrows and two right lane drop arrows for each lane modification for the interchange upgrade Pavement Marker: Type G one-way clear refroreflecfive pavement markers (Spacing @ 48 feet) were assumed for Terrain 1, 2 and 3 component types only. The unit cost used for pavement marker is $5.06 each (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). Signage: The signage unit cost accounts for the costs of one -post signs and two -post signs. The unit cost used for one -post signs and two -post signs are $367.69 and $1,211.58 each, respectively (Source: Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data). The post sign quantities assumed for each component type is summarized below. Sign Type Terrain 1, 2& 3 Interchan e Intersection 2 3 One Post Signs 33 14 36 20 3 Two Post Signs - 4 4 4 0 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS): The unit cost used for ITS is $686,338.50 per route mile (Source: Local Projects and MBI ITS Group). It is assumed that there is no existing ITS infrastructure (with the exception of isolated ITS devices) within the TUMF Network roadway segments and essential ITS infrastructure is furnished and installed. This essential ITS infrastructure includes ethernet switch, fiber jumper, fiber distribution unit, splice enclosure, pull box, new cabinet with foundation, 144 strand single -mode fiber optic (SMFO) cable and 3" conduits. Minor Items, Roadway Mobilization, and Roadway Additions: A lump sum value is used to account for minor items, roadway mobilization and roadway additions as described below. These lump sum values are recommended based on provisions in Project Development Procedure Manual (PDPM) and the WRCOG F-7 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 date from individual sources presented in the introduction of this report (Source: RCTC) Items Unit Cost Minor Items 10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage, specialty items and traffic items. Roadway 10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage, Mobilization specialty items, traffic items and minor items. Roadway Additions 10% of earthwork, pavement structure, drainage, specialty items, traffic items and minor items. II. Structure Items New Bridge: New interchanges account for construction of a new bridge. The unit cost for a new travel way bridge construction and RRXingsl and 2 (New and Widening of Rail Grade Crossings) is $400.00 per square foot (Source: MBI Structural group). The width of a new bridge is assumed to be 82 feet (4 lanes x 12ft + 1 Oft shoulder x 2 + 14ft median). Bridge Widening: Bridge widenings account for the widening of existing bridges. The unit cost is $500.00 per square foot (Source: MBI Structural group). The width of a bridge widening is assumed to be: 2 lanes x 12ft + 1Oft shoulder. The width of an arterial crossing over rail road is assumed to be 16 feet (1 lane x 12ft + 4ft shoulder). Structural Mobilization: The cost for structural mobilization is estimated as 10% of total structure item cost (Source: Typical experience). III. Right of Way Items The right of way unit cost varies with land use designation. The unit cost for ROW was developed by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. based on a review of actual property sales within the WRCOG region during the prior 18 month period. The area of right of way acquisition for the travel way is calculated per additional lane mile, assuming the width of the right-of-way required to be 18 feet per lane (to accommodate a 12 foot roadway lane, shoulders and ancillary amenities, like storm water drainage). The right of way acquisition for RRXingsl and 2 is calculated based on ROW acquisition for bridge approaches. Property costs per square foot are derived by reviewing a large sample of recently sold land and improved properties within the greater Riverside area. The properties reviewed are identified specifically from completed semi large to very large infrastructure projects and upcoming projects with preferred alternatives and/or approved environmental reports. For the purposes of the 2022 Nexus Study update, an overall sample of approximately 2,700 properties was used. WRCOG F-8 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 The properties were designated as: urban areas (generally considered downtown, or very close to downtown in the larger cities - predominantly Corona and Riverside, with a few parcels in Temecula and Moreno Valley); suburban (primarily considered the greater areas of Hemet, Perris, San Jacinto, Moreno Valley, Lake Elsinore, outer portions of Riverside / Corona, Temecula, Murrieta, Calimesa, Eastvale, Norco, and other cities of relative size and location as those previously mentioned); and rural (considered the exurban areas between Corona / Lake Elsinore and Perris along the SR-74/79, Lake Matthews, between Wildomar and Murrieta, Temecula and Perris and other similar areas) to correspond with the land use classifications used for cost estimating purposes in the TUMF program. The properties were also determined to be partial or full property takes to determine the relative percentage of each in order to appropriately weight the average cost per square foot of each type of property. Specialty cost percentages as a share of total acquisition costs (i.e. relocation and demolition) were also derived from actual costs based on a sample of the Inland Empire projects that Epic Land Solutions, Inc. was directly involved in and therefore able to obtain reliable data. The result is an estimated average cost per square foot for ROW acquisition by land use classification which is then multiplied by the number of square feet per lane mile to obtain the required ROW to accomplish the TUMF typical cross section. The ROW requirement is then reduced by a factor of 75% for urban and suburban areas based on the collective recommendation of the PWC during the development of the initial program cost estimation methodology to reflect the assumption that a majority of the proposed TUMF facilities in these areas already exist and/or have a substantial portion of the necessary right-of-way already owned by or dedicated to the responsible jurisdiction. As a result, the TUMF program only includes the estimated cost for 25% of the right-of-way that could potentially be required to accomplish the TUMF cross sections for the conceptual improvement projects identified as part of the program in urban and suburban areas. Maintenance of Traffic: A lump sum value is used to account for maintenance of traffic cost of roadway construction. The project maintenance of traffic cost is estimated as 5% (Source: RCTC) of the total project cost. The consolidated unit cost values include typical per mile or lump sum costs for each of the eligible improvement element. These elements include new roadways, bridge improvements, interchange improvements and railroad grade separation construction costs, and right of way acquisition. The consolidated unit costs as developed for the 2024 Nexus Update are summarized in Exhibit F-1. Exhibit F-2 provides a summary of the unit costs for the various roadway and structures construction elements defined. Exhibit F-3 provides a summary of the unit costs for the various right of way categories. Exhibit F-4 provides worksheets showing the detailed unit cost calculation for each TUMF unit cost category related to roadway and structures construction, and right of way acquisition. WRCOG F-9 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 The unit cost assumptions were subsequently applied to the TUMF Network improvements identified to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of future new development. The resultant cost value was tabulated for each unique segment of the network, by improvement type. A separate cost estimate was generated for regional transit improvements based on information provided by RTA and added to the TUMF Network Cost Estimate table. Supplemental categories have been added to the cost assumptions to better delineate the costs associated with planning and engineering a project, accommodating contingencies, mitigating the cumulate multi -species habitat impacts of TUMF arterial highway improvements in accordance with the adopted Riverside County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and administering the TUMF program. Soft Costs The TUMF program provides for planning, engineering and contingency costs (collectively referred to as soft costs) for eligible projects to be reimbursed through the program. As indicated in Table 4.1, planning costs are considered to include those costs associated with planning, preliminary engineering and environmental assessment of the proposed project, with the eligible amount being 10% of the estimated TUMF eligible construction cost only. Engineering costs are considered to include project study report, design, permitting and construction oversight costs based on 25% of the estimated eligible construction cost only. Contingency is provided based on 10% of the total estimated eligible facility cost. Soft costs include all reasonable required planning, environmental clearance and mitigation, right-of-way documentation, engineering design, plan, specification and estimate preparation and construction management and oversight costs necessary to accomplish the project. The estimated soft cost factors for planning, engineering and contingency were initially established in 2002 by the WRCOG Public Works Committee, which was responsible for the development of the initial TUMF Nexus Study. The percentage multipliers were established by consensus of the PWC based on the collective experience of members in delivering similar public highway projects. A review of various data sources indicates the cost factors are generally consistent with industry guidance for conceptual cost estimation purposes. The City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering California Multi -Agency CIP Benchmarking Study (December 2016) indicates that combined design and construction management costs for roadway projects represent, on average, 50% of the total cost of construction14. Similarly, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Practical Guide for Estimating (December 201 1) also cites the following average multipliers for a range of planning and engineering activities based on national research as a basis for conceptual cost estimation: 14 City of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering California Multi - Agency CIP Benchmarking Study (December 2016), Table 3-6 Average Project Delivery Costs by Project Type (% of TCC) (Full Range of TCC). WRCOG F-10 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 • Preliminary Engineering Costs (including survey/data collection, design, environmental, utilities and contract administration) - 10% to 25% of total construction CoSt15 • Construction Engineering - 10% to 26% of total construction costs16 Furthermore, the contingency rate utilized in the TUMF program is significantly less than the industry norm for conceptual cost estimation purposes. Specifically, Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021) advocates for contingency rates of 30% to 50% of total costs to be used at the project feasibility (conceptual planning) phase of project development17, with contingency rates reduced to 10% for preliminary engineers cost estimates completed during project design18. MSHCP Section 8.5.1 of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003, states that "each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation. Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% - 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts." This provision is reiterated in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report (Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., October 2020) section "6. RCA Non -Fee Revenues" which states "The MSHCP forecast an array of revenue sources, in addition to fee revenue, supporting the conservation program. These sources were anticipated to total about 44 percent of the revenue for the program, including: • Transportation funding - includes the Measure A sales tax which is authorized through 2039 and other transportation funding sources such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) charged on new development." Table 23 Annual Non -Fee Revenue Projection in this section indicates that an average of $950,000 in MSHCP revenue was derived annually from TUMF during the three years from FYI6/17- 18/19 reflecting a TUMF contribution at 5% of construction costs consistent with the MSHCP as adopted in 2003. To clearly demonstrate compliance with the provisions of the MSHCP, the TUMF program will continue to incorporate a cost element to account for the required MSHCP contribution to mitigate the multi -species habitat impacts of constructing TUMF projects. 11 AASHTO Technical Committee on Cost Estimating (TCCE) AASHTO Practical Guide for Estimating (December 2011), Table 2.4. Preliminary Engineering Costs' Average Percentage Ranges (% of Construction). 16 AASHTO Technical Committee on Cost Estimating (TCCE) AASHTO Practical Guide for Estimating (December 2011), Section 2.2.3.2.3 Construction Engineering, "highway improvement projects in an urban environment". 1' California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Design Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021), Chapter 20 - Project Development Cost Estimates, Section 2 - Project Planning Cost Estimates, Article 2 Project Feasibility Cost Estimate, Contingencies. 11 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Design Project Development Procedures Manual (July 2021), Chapter 20 - Project Development Cost Estimates, Section 3 - Project Design Cost Estimates, Article 4 Preliminary Engineer's Cost Estimate, Contingencies. WRCOG F-11 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 An amount equal to 5% of the construction cost for new TUMF network lanes, bridges and railroad grade separations will continue to be specifically included as part of TUMF program with revenues to be provided to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) for the acquisition of land identified in the MSHCP. The relevant sections of the MSHCP document and the 2020 MSHCP Nexus Report are included in this Appendix as Exhibits F-5 and F-6, respectively. Similarly, an amount of 4% of the total TUMF eligible network cost is included as part of the TUMF program with revenues to be utilized by WRCOG to cover the direct costs to administer the program. The costs incurred by WRCOG include direct salary, fringe benefit and overhead costs for WRCOG staff assigned to administer the program and support participating jurisdictions, and costs for consultant, legal and auditing services to support the implementation of the TUMF program. Table 4.1 summarizes the unit cost estimate assumptions used to develop the TUMF network cost estimate, including a comparison of the original TUMF unit cost assumptions and the current revised unit cost assumptions developed as part of the 2009 Update of the TUMF Nexus Study. Cost estimates are provided in year of original values as indicated. WRCOG F-12 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT F-1 2024 TUMF Nexus Update - Arterial Highway Cost Assumptions: Component Type Cost Assumptions as published October 18, 2002 Cost Assumption per 2009 Nexus Update October 5, 2009 Cost Assumptions per 2016 Update Cost Assumptions per 2024 Update Description Terrain 1 $550,000.00 $628,000.00 $692,000.00 $1,132,000 Construction cost per lane mile - level terrain Terrain 2 $850,000.00 $761,000.00 $878,000.00 $1,740,000 Construction cost per lane mile - rolling terrain Terrain 3 1,150,000.00 $895,000.00 1,064,000.00 $2,350,000 Construction cost per lane mile - mountainous terrain Landuse 1 $900,000.00 1,682,000.00 2,509,000.00 $7,830,000 ROW cost factor Derlane mile -urban areas Landuse 2 $420,000.00 $803,000.00 2,263,000.00 $5,440,000 ROW cost factor perlane mile -suburban areas Landuse 3 $240,000.00 $237,000.00 $287,000.00 $490,000 ROW cost factor perlane mile -rural areas Interchange 1 n a 43,780,000.00 50,032,000.00 $84,190,000 Complex new interchan e interchan e modification cost Interchange 2 20,000,000.00 22,280,000.00 25,558,000.00 $43,490,000 New interchange/interchange modification total cost Interchange 3 10,000,000.00 10,890,000.00 12,343,000.00 $22,550,000 Ma'or interchange improvement total cost Bridge 1 $2,000.00 $2,880.00 $3,180.00 $4,800 Bridge total cost per lane per linear foot RRXinq 1 4,500,000.00 4,550,000.00 6,376,000.00 $18,200,000 New Rail Grade Crossing er lane mile RRXinq 2 2,250,000.00 2,120,000.00 2,733,000.00 $6,900,000 Existing Rail Grade Crossing per lane mile ITS n a n a n a S686.400 Infrastructure for ITS of Network roodwav se menu iDer route mile Planning 10% 10% 10% 10% Planning, prelim nary engineering and environmental assessment costs based on construction cost only En ineerin 25% 25% 25% 25% Project stud re art, design, permittingand construction oversight costs based on construction cost only Contin enc 10% 10% 10% 10% Contingency costs, including TUMF program administration based on total se ment cost Administration MSHCP 3% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% TUMF program administration based on total TUMF eligible network cost ITUMF component of MSHCP based on total TUMF eligible construction cost EXHIBIT F-2 WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 2024 Nexus Update Master Unit Cost Summary I. Roadway Items Unit Unit Cost Notes Section 1: Earthwork Roadway Excavation Travel way cubic yard $38.55 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 190101 Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 198010 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 170105 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost Same as RCTC Section 2: Pavement Structural Section PCC cubic yard $354.83 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 401050 Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 390132 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 260203 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 731504 Section 3: Drainaae Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 Same as RCTC Section 4: Specialty Items Retaining Walls square foot $90.00 Source: MBI structural group Ramp Realignment each Water Quality and Erosion Control lump sum 3% of sections 1 to 3 Same as RCTC Environmental Mitigation lump sum 3% of sections 1 to 3 Same as RCTC Section 5: Traffic Items Lighting each $7,500 Source: RCTC Traffic Signals each $531,086 Typical for public agency projects in Western Riverside County and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 846007 Marking - Thermo plastic cross walks & pavement marking square foot $7.31 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 840516 Pavement Marker Retroreflective each $5.06 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 810230 Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2021 /2022 - ITEM 820840 Signage - 2 Post each $1,21 1.58 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and Caltrans Contract Cost Data 2022/2023 - ITEM 820850 Infrastructure for ITS of Network roadway segments route mile $686,383.00 Source: Ave unit costs from Local Projects and MBI ITS Team - Assumptions: 3 Traffic Signals per route mile Section 6: Minor Items lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 5 Same as RCTC Section 7: Roadway Mobilization lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 6 Same as RCTC Section 8:Roadway Additions lump sum 10% of sections 1 to 6 Same as RCTC It. STRUCTURE ITEMS Major New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 Interchange/Interchange, Cloverleaf Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 Interchange/Interchange, Diamond Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Major Interchange Improvement - 2 Lane Bridge Widening square foot $500.00 Interchange/Interchange, Cloverleaf Interchange - Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Bridge square foot $400.00 Cost provided by MBI Structural Group Structure Mobilization lump sum 10% of structure cost Typical for public agency projects in Western Riverside County III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Urban Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $330 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Suburban Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $229 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Rural Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $5 Provided by Epic Land Solutions, Inc. Utility Relocation lump sum 10% of ROW Includes mobilization for one occurrence per lane mile Total Items I + II + III Same as RCTC Maintenance of Traffic lump sum 5% of total items Same as RCTC EXHIBIT F-3 WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee 2024 Nexus Update Master Property Cost Summary URBAN Avg. $ per SF % of Total Area Weighted Cost Commercial Part Take $22 1.4% $0.30 Full Take $597 7.9% $47.40 9.3% Industrial Part Take $29 0.5% $0.15 Full Take $267 6.0% $16.02 6.5% Single Family Residential Part Take $10 16.8% $1.68 Full Take $348 66.2% $230.24 83.0% Multi Family Residential Part Take $27 0.3% $0.07 Full Take $307 0.8% $2.52 1.1% Average Unit Price per Square Foot: $298.38 Residential & Non -Res. Relocation (7.5%): $22.38 Demolition (3%) $8.95 Urban Unit Cost per Square Foot: $329.71 SUBURBAN Avg. $ per SF % of Total Area Weighted Share Commercial Part Take $17 5.1% $0.87 Full Take $425 14.6% $62.01 19.7% Industrial Part Take $20 0.0288 $0.58 Full Take $227 0.08645 $19.62 11.5% Single Family Residential Part Take $4 0.24 $0.96 Full Take $292 0.3866 $1 12.89 62.7% Multi Family Residential Part Take $14 0.0284 $0.40 Full Take $313 0.0321 $10.05 6.1 % Average Unit Price per Square Foot: $207.37 Residential & Non -Res. Relocation (7.5%): $15.55 Demolition (3%) $6.22 Suburban Unit Cost per Square Foot: $229.14 RURAL $ per SF Range of Value of Rural Vacant land sold within last year: $0.07 - $31.48 Average price per square foot of rural land: $4.66 Miscellaneous improvements (10%): $0.46 Rural Unit Cost per Square Foot: $5.12 EXHIBIT F-4 WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Terrain 1 - Level Terrain I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Roadway Excavation Travel way cubic yard $38.55 0.00 $0 Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 0.00 $0 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $0 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Sidewalk PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593 Travel way Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $135,240 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546 Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134 Total Items 1 $1,078,318 Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.001 $53,916 Project Cost / Lane mile $1,132,234 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Terrain 2 - Rolling Terrain I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity/ lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Roadway Excavation Travel way cubic yard $38.55 7,739.26 $298,348 Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 7,739.26 $158,423 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $45,677 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Sidewalk PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593 Travel way Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $210,607 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546 Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134 Total Items 1 $1,656,133 Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.001 $82,807 Project Cost / Lane mile $1,738,940 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Terrain 3 - Mountainous Terrain I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Roadway Excavation Travel way cubic yard $38.55 15,478.52 $596,697 Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 15,478.52 $316,845 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 1.94 $23,467 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $91,354 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Sidewalk PCC cubic yard $354.83 258.13 $91,593 Travel way Asphalt Concrete Type A cubic yard $240.62 1,032.53 $248,448 Aggregate Base cubic yard $73.54 2,596.98 $190,982 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 5,280.00 $347,107 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $285,974 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 10,560.00 $27,245 Marking square foot $7.31 211.50 $1,546 Pavement Marker (Type G One-way Clear Retroreflective) each $5.06 110.00 $557 Signage - 1 Post (Mainline) each $367.69 33.00 $12,134 Total Items 1 $2,233,949 Maintenance of Traffic 5% of total items 1.00 $1 1 1,697 Project Cost / Lane mile $2,345,646 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Landuse 1 - ROW Urban areas Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Urban Travel Way square foot $329.71 95,040.00 $31,335,419 Project Cost / Lane mile 25% $7,833,855 Landuse 2 - ROW Suburban Areas Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Suburban Travel Way square foot $229.14 95,040.00 $21,777,847 Project Cost / Lane mile 25% $5,444,462 Landuse 3 - ROW Rural areas I. Roadway Items Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Rural Travel Way square foot $5.12 95,040.00 $486,605 Project Cost / Lane mile $486,605 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Interchange 1 - Complex New Interchange/Interchange Modification I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 700,000.00 $14,329,000 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 51.93 $628,349 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $1,432,900 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 13,500.00 $3,248,370 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 34,000.00 $2,500,360 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 31,000.00 $2,037,940 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $3,626,538 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 84,250.00 $217,365 Marking square foot $7.31 368.00 $2,690 Signage- 1 Post each $367.69 14.00 $5,148 Signage - 2 Post each $1,21 1.58 4.00 $4,846 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Complex New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 140,400.00 $56,160,000 Total Items I + II + III $84,193,506 Total Project Cost / lane mile $84,193,506 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Interchange 2 - New Interchange/Interchange Modification I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 400,000.00 $8,188,000 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 25.12 $304,000 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $818,800 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 7,040.00 $1,693,965 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 17,706.67 $1,302,148 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 16,000.00 $1,051,840 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $2,003,813 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 43,200.00 $111,456 Marking square foot $7.31 368.00 $2,690 Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 36.00 $13,237 Signage - 2 Post each $1,21 1.58 4.00 $4,846 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS New Interchange - 2 Lane New Bridge square foot $400.00 70,000.00 $28,000,000 Total Items I + II + III $43,494,795 Total Project Cost / lane mile $43,494,795 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Interchange 3 - Major Interchange Improvement I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 180,000.00 $3,684,600 Clearing & Grubbing Travel way acre $12,100.00 3.97 $48,000 Develop Water Supply lump sum 10% of Excavation and Borrow Cost 1.00 $368,460 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 3,128.89 $752,873 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 7,869.63 $578,733 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 16,000.00 $1,051,840 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $972,676 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 32,000.00 $82,560 Marking square foot $7.31 184.00 $1,345 Signage - 1 Post each $367.69 20.00 $7,354 Signage - 2 Post each $1,21 1.58 4.00 $4,846 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Major Interchange Improvement - 2 Lane Bridge Widening square foot $500.00 30,000.00 $15,000,000 Total Items I + II + III $22,553,287 Total Project Cost / lane mile $22,553,287 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Bridge 1 - New Bridge Cost II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Bridge square foot $400.00 12.00 $4,800 Total Items 1 + II + III $4,800 Total Project Cost / lane mile $4,800 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update RRXing 1 - New Rail Grade Crossing I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 17,931.03 $367,048 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 782.22 $188,218 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 1,967.41 $144,683 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 1,180.00 $77,573 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $1 16,628 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 1,180.00 $3,044 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Bridge square foot $400.00 2,880.00 $1,152,000 III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Urban Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $329.71 49,000.00 $16,155,790 Total Items I + II + III $18,204,986 Total Project Cost / lane mile $18,204,986 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update RRX1ng 2 - Widen Existing Rail Grade Crossing I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / lane mile Cost / lane mile Section 1: Earthwork Imported Borrow Travel way cubic yard $20.47 17.78 $364 Section 2: Pavement Structural Section Asphalt Concrete Type A (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $240.62 782.22 $188,218 Aggregate Base (Including Bike Lane) cubic yard $73.54 1,967.41 $144,683 Curb and Gutter linear foot $65.74 1,180.00 $77,573 Section 3: Drainage Project Drainage lump sum 15% of Sections 1 and 2 1.00 $61,626 Section 5: Traffic Items Striping - Thermo plastic (1 GP Lane, per direction) linear foot $2.58 1,180.00 $3,044 II. STRUCTURE ITEMS Bridge square foot $400.00 2,880.00 $1,152,000 III. RIGHT OF WAY ITEMS Urban Travel Way - Additional lane square foot $329.71 16,000.00 $5,275,360 Total Items I + II + III $6,902,869 Total Project Cost / lane mile $6,902,869 EXHIBIT F-4 (Continued) WRCOG Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Cost Assumption Estimate - 2024 Nexus Update Infrastructure for Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) on TUMF Network Roadway Segments I. ROADWAY ITEMS Unit Unit Cost Quantity / route mile Cost / route mile Infrastructure for ITS of Network roadway segments route mile $686,383.00 1.00 $686,383 Total Items I + II + III $686,383 Total Project Cost / route mile $686,383 EXHIBIT F-5 Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on June 17, 2003 Section 8.0 MSHCP Funding/Financing of Reserve Assembly and Management WRCOG F-13 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 8.o MSHCP FundinglFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management 8.5 LOCAL FUNDING PROGRAM The following local funding plan describes the local commitment for funding Reserve Assembly, Management, and Monitoring. The local funding program includes funding from a variety of sources, including but not limited to, regional funding resulting from the importation of waste into landfills in Riverside County, mitigation for regional public infrastructure projects, mitigation for private infrastructure projects, mitigation for private Development, funds generated by local or regional incentive programs that encourage compact growth and the creation of transit -oriented communities, and dedications of lands in conjunction with local approval of private development projects. The local funding program will fund the local portion of: • Land acquisition • Management • Monitoring • Adaptive Management • Plan administration 8.5.1 Funding Sources Local funding sources include funding from both public and private developers and regional entities in an effort to spread the financial burden of the MSHCP over a broad base. The mix of funding sources provides an equitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP. In addition to equitably distributing mitigation for local projects, utilizing a mixture of funding sources will help ensure the long-term viability of the local funding program because a temporary decline in funding from one source may be offset by increases from another. The proposed local funding sources are described below and include: • Local Development Mitigation Fees • Density Bonus Fees • Regional Infrastructure Project Contribution • Landfill Tipping Fees VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-14 8.0 MSHCP FundinglFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management • Other Potential New Revenue Sources Local Development Mitigation Fees New Development affects the environment directly through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from Development. Government Code Section 66000 et seq. allows cities and counties to charge new Development for the costs of mitigating the impacts of new Development. The Cities and County will implement a Development Mitigation Fee pursuant to the MSHCP; this fee will be one of the primary sources of funding the implementation of the MSHCP. The fee ordinance adopted by the Cities and the County will provide for an annual CPI adjustment based upon the Consumer Price Index for "All Urban Consumers" in the Los Angeles -Anaheim - Riverside Area, measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends in the previous Fiscal Year. There will also be a provision for the fee to be reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new Development. A fee of approximately $1,500 per residential unit (or an equivalent fee per acre) and $4,800 per acre of commercial or industrial Development was used in the revenue projection shown in Appendix B-05 of this document. The projected revenues from the Development Mitigation Fee are anticipated to be approximately $540 million over the next 25 years. A nexus study is required to demonstrate that the proposed fee is proportionate to the impacts of the new Development. Density Bonus Fees The New Riverside County General Plan creates a number of incentive plans that have the potential both to further the goals of the County's General Plan and to facilitate the implementation of the MSHCP. Section 8.4.2 above discusses the use of the Rural Incentive Program to aid in the Conservation of lands through non -acquisition means. An additional component of the Incentive Program enables developers to acquire the right to develop at an additional 25% increase in density by providing enhancements to their projects and by paying a "Density Bonus Fee." The fee is anticipated to be $3,000 — $5,000 per additional unit. This program offers a significant incentive to developers when compared with the typical cost of creating a new buildable lot. The Density Bonus program is new to Riverside County, and it is, therefore, difficult to project annual revenues. The Local Funding Program assumes that between 10% and 20% of the residential units built in the unincorporated County area will participate in the incentive program and that only 50% of the revenues of the program will be committed to the MSHCP, with the remaining portion staying in the local community in which the additional units are located to provide additional VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-15 8.0 MSHCP FundinglFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management amenities that will help offset the greater density. Of the 330,000 units projected to be built over the next 25 years, 10% (or 33,000 units) are assumed to be built utilizing the Density Bonus Fee resulting in $132,000,000 in revenues of which 50% (or $66,000,000) will be allocated to the MSHCP. Regional Infrastructure Project Contribution Regional infrastructure prof ects directly affect the environment not only through the effect they have on species and their Habitats, but also by facilitating continued new Development. It is appropriate, therefore, for regional infrastructure projects to contribute to Plan implementation. Four general categories of infrastructure projects have been identified: • Transportation Infrastructure • Regional Utility Projects • Local Public Capital Construction Projects • Regional Flood Control Projects Transportation Infrastructure The RCIP has identified the need for approximately $12 billion in new transportation infrastructure to support the Development proposed for the next 25 years. Each new transportation project will contribute to Plan implementation. Historically, these projects have budgeted 3% — 5% of their construction costs to mitigate environmental impacts. The local funding program anticipates that more than one-half of the $12 billion cost of contribution to acquisition of Additional Reserve Lands will be funded locally and will result in approximately $371 million in contribution over the next 25 years as discussed below. Riverside County's 1/2 cent sales tax for Transportation In 1988, Riverside County voters approved a measure to increase local sales tax by'/2 cent to fund new transportation projects (Measure A). The sales tax measure is due to be reauthorized in 2002. Under the reauthorization, $121 million will be allocated as local contribution under the MSHCP. (For further information on the sales tax measure, see Section 13.5 of the MSHCP Implementing Agreement and Appendix B-07 of this document). VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-16 8.0 MSHCP FundingiFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management Regional Utility Projects \�F cauNr KC �ti�Ec.�_ ��o�t 11111 As Riverside County's population doubles over the next 25 years, new regional utility infrastructure will be required. Since the utilities are not Permittees under the MSHCP, they may choose to mitigate under the Plan or seek their own regulatory permits. In either case, their mitigation will be focused on the objectives of the MSHCP and will contribute to the local implementation funding. No estimate of the number of projects or the scope or costs is available at this time; consequently, no estimate of mitigation funding has been made. The Permittees expect that regional utilityproj ects will contribute to the implementation of the MSHCP and provide an additional contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected. Local Public Capital Construction Projects Local public capital construction projects may include construction of new schools, universities, City or County administrative facilities, jails, courts, juvenile facilities, parks, libraries, or other facilities that serve the public. These projects will be mitigated underthe MSHCP and will utilize a per acre mitigation fee based on the fee then in place for private, commercial and industrial Development. No attempt has been made to estimate the number or magnitude of these projects. The Permittees expect that local pubic construction projects will contribute to the implementation of the MSHCP and provide an additional contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected. Regional Flood Control Projects Flood control proj ects will receive coverage under the MSHCP for both new capital construction and for the maintenance of existing and new facilities. Preliminary estimates from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District indicate that they will likely budget approximately $15 M in projects annually. Based on using 3% of capital costs, the District would be expected to contribute approximately $450,000 to $750,000 annually to MSHCP implementation. Since many flood control projects serve existing developed communities and therefore have less impacts than projects adding capacity to serve new Development and may provide some conservation value especially in terms of Constrained Linkages, the District's contributions may average something below the 5% level on average. VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-17 8.0 MSHCP FundingiFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management Landfill Tipping Fees Riverside County has utilized revenues from public and private landfills in Riverside County to generate funding for conservation and open space projects for over a decade. In 1990, the County utilized $1 per ton tipping fee assessed all waste deposited in County landfills to fund the acquisition of the Santa Rosa Plateau and approximately $260,000 annually to fund the operation of the County Park and Open Space Districts. More recently, the County has negotiated agreements with two private landfills in the County to commit $1 per ton on all waste imported from outside Riverside County to Conservation within Riverside County. El Sobrante Landfill This privately owned landfill was permitted to expand its capacity to 10,000 tons per day in 2001. In approving the landfill expansion, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors authorized fifty cents per ton of the County's portion of the revenue from the landfill expansion to be applied to Conservation in addition to the $1 per ton that was committed under the landfill agreement. The projection of the annual tonnage and revenue for Conservation included in Appendix B-09 of this document reflects the $1.5 per ton commitment to Conservation. Over the life of the landfill, 60 million tons of imported waste are allowed. Sixty million tons at $1.5 per ton will generate $90 million for Conservation. The Cash Flow Analysis in Appendix B-10 of this document reflects the annual revenues from the El Sobrante Landfill. County Landfills The County Board of Supervisors, beginning in 1990, authorized $1 per ton for all in -county waste deposited in County landfills to go toward habitat and open space Conservation. After adjusting for the debt service on the Santa Rosa Plateau acquisition and an annual commitment to the Park and Open Space District, there is a projected annual balance of $400,000 that can be applied to additional Conservation under the MSHCP. Appendix B-09 of this document includes a projection of tonnage from in -County waste at County landfills. The Cash Flow Analysis in Appendix B-10 of this document reflects the annual revenues from the County landfills. Over the next 25 years, County landfills will contribute approximately $10 million to the implementation of the MSHCP. VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-18 8.0 MSHCP FundingiFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management Eagle Mountain In 1997, the County approved the use of the old Kaiser mine at Eagle Mountain in eastern Riverside County as a regional landfill to serve primarily Los Angeles County. Subsequently, the Los Angeles County Sanitation District has acquired the rights to the Eagle Mountain Landfill and intends to begin operation of the landfill within the next decade. At this time, litigation is still pending that could prohibit the development of the landfill. The Development Agreement with the County would require the payment of $1 per ton for Conservation if the landfill is developed. Conservation needs in the Coachella Valley would have first priority over the revenues from the Eagle Mountain Landfill; however, some portion of the revenues would be available to support Conservation needs in Western Riverside County. The Permittees expect that the Eagle Mountain Landfill will provide funding to support implementation of the MSHCP over the life of the MSHCP. However, no revenue from the Eagle Mountain Landfill has been projected in the funding program at this time. These potential revenues provide a contingency should other revenue sources not generate the projected levels of funding or should implementation costs be higher than projected. Potential New Revenue Sources The County and Cities may levy assessments to pay for services that directly benefit the property on which the fee is levied. Under current law, a local election may be required to initially levy the assessment or to confirm the assessment if a protest is filed. No such assessments are currently projected for the MSHCP. As the MSHCP Conservation Area is developed, however, its value as open space and for recreation opportunities may lend itself to a local funding program for ongoing management and enhancement. In more urban areas, which Western Riverside County will be in 25 years, local voters routinely approve such funding programs. Other revenue opportunities may be realized over the next 25 years. The County, Cities, and RCA will explore new revenue sources to support the acquisition of the MSHCP Conservation Area and its long-term management and enhancement. A goal of any new fee would be to spread a portion of the costs for the MSHCP across as broad a regional base as possible. VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-19 8.0 MSHCP FundinglFinancing Of Reserve Assembly and Management TABLE 8-5 LOCAL PUBLIC/REGIONAL FUNDING SOURCES Source Anticipated $ Range Requirements to Implement Responsible Party Private Funding Sources: Cities and County $539.6M Approval of County Ordinance County Development Mitigation Fees Approval of City(ies) Ordinance Cities Density Bonus Fees $66M Approval of General Plan County Public Funding Sources Local Roads $121 M Approval of Measure A, local agreement on RCTC/County allocation Other Transportation $250M % of new road construction RCTC/County Other infrastructure Projects $unknown Project -by -project negotiation County and Cities El Sobrante Landfill $90M In place County County Landfills $10M In place County Eagle Mountain Landfill $unknown In place pending start-up County New Regional funding $unknown Voter approval County and Cities TOTAL LOCAL FUNDS $1,076.6M 8.6 ADEQUACY OF FUNDING The Permittees and the Wildlife Agencies will annually evaluate the performance of the funding mechanisms and, notwithstanding other provisions of the MSHCP, will develop any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms to address additional funding needs. Additionally, this annual evaluation will include an assessment of the funding plan and anticipate funding needs over the ensuing 18 months for the purpose of identifying any potential deficiencies in cash flow. If deficiencies are identified through this evaluation, then the Permittees and the Wildlife Agencies will develop strategies to address any additional funding needs consistent with the terms and conditions of the MSHCP. VOLUME I ♦ SECTION 8 June 17, 2003 FINAL MSHCP 8-20 EXHIBIT F-6 Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report Economic & Planning Systems, Inc., October 2020 WRCOG F-14 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Final Report Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Prepared for: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Prepared by: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. October 2020 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1330 Broadway Suite 450 Oakland, CA 946I2 510 64I 9190 tel Oakland EPS #171034 Sacramento Denver Los Angeles www.epsys.com Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION AND KEY FINDINGS.............................................................................. I Background............................................................................................................ 1 Original and Existing Fee Schedule............................................................................ 2 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedules............................................................................. 3 Key Drivers of Fee Change....................................................................................... 6 Organizationof Report............................................................................................. 8 2. MSHCP POLICIES, GOALS, AND FINANCING STRATEGY.......................................................9 MSHCP Purpose, Basis, and Goals.............................................................................. 9 MSHCP Financing Strategy..................................................................................... 11 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources ................................................... 13 Development Mitigation Fees and Calculation............................................................ 16 3. HABITAT PROTECTION TO DATE AND FUTURE CONSERVATION SCENARIO ................................. 18 Habitat Protection Accomplishments Through 2019.................................................... 18 Conservation Goals and Progress............................................................................ 18 LandDedications.................................................................................................. 20 Future Conservation Scenario................................................................................. 21 4. FORECASTS OF DEVELOPMENT, DEDICATION, FEE PAYMENT ................................................ 25 Historic Development and HCP Fees......................................................................... 25 GrowthProjections................................................................................................ 26 5. MSHCP IMPLEMENTATION COSTS.............................................................................. 31 LandCosts........................................................................................................... 31 Other Costs —Administration, Management, and Monitoring ......................................... 35 EndowmentFunding.............................................................................................. 38 Total Implementation Costs.................................................................................... 40 6. RCA NON -FEE REVENUES....................................................................................... 43 MSHCP Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues..................................................................... 43 New Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues......................................................................... 44 7. MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION................................................................................. 46 8. MITIGATION FEE ACT (NEXUS) FINDINGS..................................................................... 52 Purposeof Fee..................................................................................................... 52 Useof Fee Revenues............................................................................................. 53 Relationship......................................................................................................... 53 Need................................................................................................................... 54 Proportionality...................................................................................................... 54 9. FEE IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................ 56 Adoption of Revised LDMF...................................................................................... 56 Securing Supplemental Funding.............................................................................. 56 AnnualReview...................................................................................................... 56 SurplusFunds...................................................................................................... 57 Annual and Periodic Updates................................................................................... 57 Appendix I: Detailed Time Series of Implementation Costs, Excluding Endowment Funding Appendix II: Detailed Time Series of Endowment Funding List of Tables Table 1 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule............................................................ 3 Table 2 Updated MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees .................. 4 Table 3 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedule by Extension Scenario...................................6 Table 4 MSHCP Goals by Area Plan........................................................................ 11 Table 5 2004 Estimates: MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources ............... 14 Table 6 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule.......................................................... 17 Table 7 Conservation Through End of 2019............................................................. 18 Table 8 Required Acquisition Acres to Achieve ARL Goals .......................................... 24 Table 9 Projected Growth in Western Riverside County, through 2050......................... 29 Table 10 Projected Developed Acres in Western Riverside County, by Extension Scenario................................................................................... 30 Table 11 Per -Acre Land Value Estimates-2003 Dollars (2003 Nexus Study) .................. 32 Table 12 Local Conservation Costs Through 2018...................................................... 32 Table 13 Planning Level Per Acre Land Value Estimates by Category ............................. 33 Table 14 Illustrative Distribution of Land Acquisitions by Land Use and Size ................... 34 Table 15 Aggregate Land Value of Remaining Areas (2017 dollars) ............................... 34 Table 16 Administrative and Professional Services Costs ............................................. 36 Table 17 Management and Monitoring Anticipated Costs in 2004 and 2019 Dollars ........ 38 Table 18 Annual Implementation Cost Estimate(2019$)............................................. 39 Table 19 Endowment Funding (2019$), by Extension Scenario .................................... 40 Table 20 Total Implementation Costs (2019$*), by Extension Scenario ......................... 41 Table 21 Average Annual Implementation Costs (2019$), by Extension Scenario............ 42 Table 22 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources ................................................... 44 Table 23 Annual Non -Fee Revenue Projection (2019$s).............................................. 45 Table 24 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees ............................ 47 Table 25 Recommended Fee Level —No Extension...................................................... 48 Table 26 Recommended Fee Level-5-Year Extension ................................................. 49 Table 27 Recommended Fee Level-10-Year Extension ............................................... 50 Table 28 Recommended Fee Level-15-Year Extension ............................................... 51 List of Figures Figure 1 State of Conservation in 2003: Conserved Land, Additional Reserve Land to be Acquired, and Total MSHCP Conservation Area Needed .................. 10 Figure 2 MSHCP Estimated Annual Costs in Millions, 2004 Dollars ................................ 15 Figure 3 MSHCP Estimated Annual Revenues in Millions, 2004 Dollars .......................... 16 Figure 4 MSHCP Conservation Goals, 2019 and 2029 Goals Highlighted ........................ 19 Figure 5 Progress Towards ARL Through End of 2019................................................ 20 Figure 6 Residential Unit Development, Western Riverside County, 2005-2019.............. 25 Figure 7 New Housing Units per Year, SCAG and MSHCP Projections and Historic Production(2005-2019)................................................................. 27 Figure 8 Newly Developed Commercial Acres per Year ............................................... 27 Figure 9 Comparison of Costs by Category............................................................... 40 Figure 10 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources ................................................... 44 1, INTRODUCTION AND KEY FINDINGS This Updated Nexus Study (2020 Nexus Study) provides the technical justification for changes to the Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule that applies to Local Permittee participants in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan). These changes are necessary to ensure adequate funding of the obligations of the Local Permittees under the MSHCP and the associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement. The resulting increased fee revenues will support the continued implementation of the MSHCP and the streamlining of endangered species incidental take permitting for new Western Riverside County development provided under the MSHCP. This Nexus Study is consistent with the requirements of California Government Code 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act) that requires specific findings (as well as administration and implementation procedures) for "any action establishing, increasing, or imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project by a local agency." Background The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan), originally adopted in 2004, is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) focusing on the conservation of species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP was developed in response to the need for future growth opportunities in Western Riverside County while addressing the requirements of the State and federal Endangered Species Acts. The MSHCP serves as an HCP pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan under the NCCP Act of 2001. The MSHCP streamlines these environmental permitting processes by allowing the participating jurisdictions to authorize "take" of plant and wildlife species identified within the Plan Area. At the same time, Plan implementation provides a coordinated MSHCP Conservation Area and implementation program to preserve biological diversity and maintain the region's quality of life. The MSHCP and the associated Implementing Agreement and Incidental Take Permit collectively determine a set of conservation actions that must be taken to meet the terms of the Incidental Take Permit and benefit from the regulatory streamlining and other benefits of the MSHCP. This includes the identification of the responsible parties, including the responsibilities of the Local Permittees.1 One of the key requirements of the MSHCP, Implementing Agreement, and Incidental Take Permit (consistent with the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act) is the provision of adequate funding by Local Permittees to the Implementing Entity (the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority2) to conduct their portion of the conservation actions identified in the MSHCP. 1 Local Permittees include the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Park and Open -Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, and Riverside County Transportation Commission. Z The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Agency is a Joint Powers Authority established in 2004 to implement the MSHCP. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 1 �.se 11-y'o, �M,c—.",. —slNet oIllt0.0o �MA�MDD�Ne�St.d F;,a,2io-0— Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Section 8.0 of the MSHCP outlines the MSHCP funding/financing approach. It also identified best estimates of Plan implementation costs at the time of Plan adoption, including the local funding commitment that represents a portion of the overall land acquisition, management and monitoring, and Plan administration costs. The Local Funding Program included a mix of funding sources to provide "an equitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP." The proposed funding sources included Local Development Mitigation Fees (and land dedications), regional infrastructure project public contributions (including contributions to mitigate for transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects), and landfill tipping fees. Participating cities and the County were each required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee under California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the "Mitigation Fee Act") and supported by the separate "Final Mitigation Fee Nexus Study Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan," July 1, 2003 (Original or 2003 Nexus Study). The MSHCP funding chapter notes the need for frequent evaluations of the performance of the funding mechanisms and assessments of the funding plan and the need to make any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms. The MSHCP also notes that the mitigation fee will need to be "reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new development." In addition to the common practice of updating mitigation fees periodically to account for changing circumstances, the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) has determined that significant changes have occurred and/or circumstances have arisen that justify an update to the mitigation fees. These changes include, but are not limited to, the following: • The need to acquire more land than originally forecast due to the lower than expected land dedication. • The lower -than -expected levels of non -fee funding from local and regional funding sources. • The lower than expected levels of residential development. • The need to diversify land acquisitions away from a focus on the larger, more remote parcels to also acquiring parcels closer to urbanized areas, consistent with the reserve assembly requirements of the MSHCP. Original and Existing Fee Schedule All local jurisdictions participating in the MSHCP and obtaining coverage for public and private take in their jurisdictions were required to adopt and implement the 2004 Mitigation Fee Schedule through ordinance and resolution and then to pass through the fee funding (except for any additional administrative charges added by the jurisdictions) to the RCA to fund MSHCP implementation. The ordinances allowed for periodic inflationary increases based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area. In 2018 the Bureau of Labor Statistics implemented a geographic revision, establishing Riverside as its own Core Based Statistical Area. As a result, Riverside was removed from the Consumer Price Index encompassing Los Angeles and Anaheim. Going forward, inflationary increases will be based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the newly established Riverside -San Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 2 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Bernardino -Ontario area. As outlined in the 2003 Nexus Study (Original Nexus Study), all new development in Western Riverside County is required to pay the mitigation fee. Table 1 shows the original 2004 Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule and the current 2021 Fee Schedule that reflects periodic inflationary fee adjustments using the indexing process that collectively increased the fees by 35 percent between 2004 and 2020 (this was below the overall inflation index increase over this period). Table 1 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule Residential: Up to 8.0 dwelling units per acre $1,651 $2,234 (DUAC) Residential: 8.0-14.0 DUAC $1,057 $1,430 Residential: 14.0+ DUAC $859 $1,161 Commercial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606 Industrial (per acre) $5,620 $7,606 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedules This 2020 Nexus Study has estimated the increased fee level that would be required to provide sufficient revenues, based on the best available forecasts of future growth, to support the full implementation of the MSHCP, including the completion of all land acquisition and the establishment of the necessary endowment, by 2029 (Year 25 of Plan implementation).4 Because, as shown below, this would require a major increase in the fee levels, three other scenarios are also considered where different time extensions provide more time for land acquisition.5 These extensions allow for the costs of Plan implementation (including land acquisitions) to be spread across more development and, as a result, moderate the level of mitigation fee increase required. In addition, the longer extension scenarios require a pace of land acquisition that is more consistent with what has proven to be achievable. All of these fee 3 Note it is RCA procedure to refer to fees during, for example, Fiscal Year 2020/2021, as the 2021 fee. The 2021 fee became effective July 1, 2020, and applies for the fiscal year of 2020-21 (i.e., until June 30, 2021 when the 2022 Fee begins). 4 The MSHCP provided a 25-year period of the required land acquisition with the larger 75-year permit term. This is labelled the "No Extension" or "Baseline Scenario" in this Update Study. 5 The baseline scenario as well as the extension scenarios assume that all land acquisition as well as the full endowment will be completed/ established by the end of the specified implementation/ land acquisition period. Interest from the non -depleting endowment will fund all ongoing costs thereafter. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 3 ��.Wl VPPDaa .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 increases would be consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act and the MSHCP and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement. The mitigation fee levels shown for each extension scenario are the fee levels required to cover the appropriate portion of the Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs based on the best information available at this time. The revised mitigation fee levels reflect changes in estimated costs, expected levels of land dedication, and non -fee funding. Consistent with the MSHCP and Original Nexus Study, it is assumed that all new development in Western Riverside County will pay the mitigation fee because, as noted in the MSHCP, "new development affects the environment through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from such development."6 Importantly, the revised mitigation fee levels also reflect the decision to determine the mitigation fee that applies to different land uses on a consistent per gross acre basis. This approach is considered to provide a clear, consistent, and proportionate method for determining mitigation fees on new development.? The 2020 Nexus Study does convert the overarching per gross acre fee into per unit residential fees for different density ranges; this conversion was conducted to provide implementation/administrative consistency for member jurisdictions. Table 2 Updated MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees Net Cost $912,756,583 $902,353,150 $892,767,438 $883,987,805 Acres of Development Residential 14,026 21,818 29,611 37,403 Nonresidential 6,239 9,705 13,171 16,637 Total 20,265 31,523 42,782 54,040 Mitigation Fee per Acre $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. s Consistent with the Original Nexus Study and the technical analysis in this study update (and as described in more detail in the Fee Implementation Handbook), certain types of public improvements/ infrastructure projects will make mitigation payments calculated as a percent of total improvement cost. All projects are required to make a mitigation payment/contribution (except where exempted as specified in the Ordinance); where no mitigation payment process is specified, the project will pay the updated per acre mitigation fee. 7 This is the approach taken by the majority of regional Habitat Conservation Plans in California, including the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan mitigation fee. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 4 ��.Wl VPPDaa .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 As shown in Table 2, the required mitigation fee per gross acre of development varies substantially based on level of extension as follows: • No Extension. Under the current structure, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 25 of MSHCP implementation (2029), a mitigation fee of $45,041 per acre of development would be required. • 5-Year Extension. With a 5-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 30 of MSHCP implementation (2034), a mitigation fee of $28,625 per acre of development would be required. • 10-Year Extension. With a 10-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 35 of MSHCP implementation (2039), a mitigation fee of $20,868 per acre of development would be required. • 15-Year Extension. With a 15-year extension, where all land acquisition must occur by the end of Year 40 of MSHCP implementation (2044), a mitigation fee of $16,358 per acre of development would be required. For residential development, the per gross acre fee is translated into per residential unit fees by density category to provide for a fee framework that is consistent with the current fee structure. The per residential unit fees are calculated by dividing the per gross acre fee by an assumed typical/ average density for each of the three density ranges (low, medium, and high).8 The full mitigation fee schedule (for each extension scenario) is shown in Table 3, including the per unit residential fees by density category and per gross acre fees for non-residential development. The typical/ average residential densities used to calculate the per -unit residential fees are the same as the density assumptions in the Original Nexus Study.9 8 For example, the $3,635 per unit Residential - Low fee under the 15-year extension is derived by dividing the overall per gross acre mitigation fee of $16,358 (shown in Figure 2) by the assumed typical/average density of Residential Low of 4.5 units/acre. 9 The Fee Implementation Handbook provides more specifics on how to determine a project's residential density and therefore the appropriate per unit residential fee that applies. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 5 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 3 Updated Mitigation Fee Schedule by Extension Scenario Current Fee No 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year Fee Per Unit 2021� Extension Extension Extension Extension aL Residential - Low (Up to 8.0 DUAC )2 3 $2,234 $10,009 $6,361 $4,637 $3,635 Residential - Medium (8.0-14.0 DUAC)23 $1,430 $4,170 $2,650 $1,932 $1,515 Residential - High (14.0+ DUAC) 23 $1,161 $1,846 $1,173 $855 $670 Commercial / Industrial (per acre) $7,606 $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 1. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Conservation. Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule for FY 2020-21 (Effective July 1, 2020 — June 30, 2021), annually adjusted using the Consumer Price Index. 2. Per acre mitigation fees translated into per unit fees based on the following residential densities: for low density, 4.5 units per acre; for medium density, 10.8 units per acre; for high density, 24.4 units per acre, consistent with the assumptions used in Appendix E of the original Nexus Study. 3. DUAC stands for Dwelling Units per Acre. Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Key Drivers of Fee Change The change in Local Development Mitigation Fee is the result of a number of different contributing factors ("moving parts"), fully documented and detailed in Chapters 2 through 7. This Nexus Study is based on the most current information available including, for some inputs, recent years of experience from MSHCP implementation. The factors that have had the most significant effect on the Local Development Mitigation Fee calculations are summarized below. 1. Lower -than -expected land dedications substantially increase the Local Permittee habitat acquisition cost component of MSHCP implementation. The MSHCP assumed that 41,000 of the 97,000 acres (42 percent) to be conserved by Local Permittee action/funding would be provided at no cost through land dedication associated with development inside the Criteria Cells. Through the first sixteen years of Plan implementation, less than 1,000 acres of the Local Permittee habitat conservation obligations have been generated through these dedications. An additional 10,000 acres of land dedication requirements have been required as part of proposed developments that have yet to occur. Beyond the dedication associated with previously proposed projects, additional land dedication is not expected.10 As a result, the 2020 Nexus Study assumes the noted 10,000 acres of land dedication is formalized over the next eight years (an average annual land dedication of 1,250 acres per year) prior to the end of the current land acquisition period. No additional land dedication is assumed, even if the acquisition period is extended. As a result, at the end of the current habitat acquisition period (Year 25 of Plan 10 In September 2016, the RCA revised its fee credit and waiver policy, limiting the likelihood of projects paying fees and dedicating land. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 6. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 implementation), total land dedication is expected to represent about 11,000 acres and about 11 percent of the Local Permittee land conservation requirement. The RCA therefore needs to directly acquire an additional 30,000 acres of land relative to the expectations of the Original Nexus Study. 2. Lower than expected regional infrastructure public contributions have reduced the non -fee funding available, increasing the costs to be funded through the mitigation fee. The MSHCP assumed a substantial level of funding from regional infrastructure project public contributions, including transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects, as well as from landfill tipping fees. While the Measure A sales tax has provided substantial funding as expected, other revenue sources, on aggregate, have provided (and are expected to continue to provide) substantially less funding than forecast in the 2003 Nexus Study. As a result, mitigation fees will need to cover about 91 percent of Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs relative to the original assumption of about 56 percent. 3. The change towards a consistent "per gross developed acre" fee basis provides a more consistent approach for all land use development types. The 2003 Nexus Study used an "Equivalent Benefit Unit" approach to distributing mitigation costs between different land use categories. This Nexus Study adjusts the fee calculation to the more commonly used per gross acre basis. Under this approach, the new Local Development Mitigation Fees are all based on one "across the board" per gross acre fee determination. Non-residential development then pays this per acre fee, while per unit residential fees by density category are derived from this common per gross acre fee." This change evens out some of the prior differences in mitigation fee levels. 4. The estimates of average per acre land values have not changed substantially, so they have had a limited effect on the change in mitigation fees. The original MSHCP implementation cost estimate was based on an average land value of about $13,100 per acre. This was based on research on land transactions of parcels with different land use designations and sizes in 2001/2002. The land valuation analysis conducted for this Nexus Study estimated a planning -level land value of about $14,300 per acre based on land transactions primarily in the 2014 to 2017 period (inflated to 2019-dollar terms). As a result, land value estimates have not changed substantially in nominal dollar terms since the Original Nexus Study. This estimated per acre land value is above the cost of most RCA transactions to date, though the average land values of future RCA land acquisition are expected to increase due to the increasing need to purchase more expensive land in "linkage" areas. 11 Similar to the Original Nexus Study, all new development in Western Riverside County is required to pay the mitigation fee (or otherwise provide the necessary mitigation). The conversion from per gross acre to per unit fees for residential development is conducted to provide administrative continuity for member agencies. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 7 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Organization of Report This Nexus Study includes several chapters. Chapter 1, this chapter, describes the purpose and need for this Nexus Study, the recommended changes in the Local Development Mitigation Fee, and the key drivers of these changes. Chapters 2 through 7 provide the technical analysis that supports the updated fees and nexus findings. Chapter 2 summarizes the purpose of and basis for the MSHCP, the conservation requirements of the MSHCP, and the financing strategy and approach developed to implement the MSHCP in 2004. Chapter 3 describes the conservation achievements to date, identifies the remaining conservation requirements, and identifies expected land dedication. Chapter 4 provides the development forecast used in the calculation of the updated mitigation fees. Chapter 5 provides the estimates of MSHCP implementation costs, including land acquisition, management and monitoring, program administration, and endowment. Chapter 6 describes the historical levels of non -fee revenues available to help fund Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs. Chapter 7 brings together the technical analysis in Chapters 2 through 6 to estimate the updated 2020 Local Development Mitigation Fees. Chapter 8 provides the nexus findings required under the Mitigation Fee Act as require to establish the updated fees. Finally, Chapter 9 highlights some of the administration and implementation requirements under the Mitigation Fee Act, recognizing that the Fee Implementation Handbook provides more specific guidance to the RCA and its partner agencies on the implementation of the mitigation fee program. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 8 230-0- 2. MSHCP POLICIES, GOALS, AND FINANCING STRATEGY MSHCP Purpose, Basis, and Goals In response to the need to maintain future growth opportunities in Western Riverside County while addressing the requirements of the state and federal Endangered Species Acts, the County and the Riverside County Transportation Commission initiated the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) in 1999. The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is one part of the RCIP that includes: Updated County General Plan. Addresses the required general plan elements such as land use, circulation, housing and open space, and conservation and includes programs to implement the MSHCP, enhance transit alternatives, and encourage development of mixed - use centers. • Community and Environment Transportation Acceptability Process. Identifies future transportation corridors in Western Riverside and provides needed environmental documentation to allow preservation of future right-of-ways. • MSHCP. The Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP or Plan) is a comprehensive, multi -jurisdictional Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) focusing on the conservation of species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP conserves vulnerable plant and animal species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County and supports economic development. The MSHCP was adopted in 2003 by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Subsequently, all of the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Parks and Open -Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, Riverside County Transportation Commission, California Department of Transportation, California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Department of Fish and Game, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the RCA signed an Implementing Agreement for the MSHCP. The Implementing Agreement includes terms to ensure MSHCP-implementation, defines remedies and recourses should any of the parties of the Agreement fail to perform obligations, and provides assurances that, as long as the MSHCP is being implemented, the Wildlife Agencies will not require additional mitigation from the Permittees.12 The MSHCP serves as an HCP pursuant to Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 as well as a Natural Communities Conservation Plan under the NCCP Act of 2001. The MSHCP streamlines these environmental permitting processes by allowing the participating jurisdictions to authorize "take" of plant and wildlife species identified within the Plan Area. At the same time, Plan implementation provides a coordinated MSHCP Conservation Area and implementation program to preserve biological diversity and maintain the region's quality of life. 12 The Wildlife Agencies include the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the Permittees include all of the other parties to the Implementing Agreement. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 9 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 The MSHCP and the associated Implementing Agreement and Incidental Take Permit collectively determine a set of conservation actions, and the associated responsible parties, that must be taken to meet the terms of the Incidental Take Permit and benefit from the regulatory streamlining and other benefits of the MSHCP. This includes the identification of the responsibilities of the Local Permittees.13 MSHCP Conservation Requirements The goal of the MSHCP is to enhance and maintain biological diversity and ecosystems processes while allowing future economic growth. The MSHCP calls for an MSHCP Conservation Area of 500,000 acres and focuses on the conservation of 146 species. Figure 1 State of Conservation in 2003: Conserved Land, Additional Reserve Land to be Acquired, and Total MSHCP Conservation Area Needed 600,000 500,000 500,000 347,000 400,000 162,000 Acres 300,000 65,000 200,000 153,000 282,000 338,000 100,000 97,000 ❑0 2004 Existing Acquire: Additional Total Public/Quasi Public Reserve Land Land Federal/State Local As shown in Figure 1, when the MSHCP was adopted, existing public and quasi -public conservation lands covered 347,000 acres, leaving a need for 153,000 acres of land, called Additional Reserve Land (ARL), to meet the goals of the MSHCP (see Figure 1). The MSHCP specifies that responsibility for the conservation of the 153,000-acre Additional Reserve Lands is shared by the local development process (97,000 acres) and state and federal purchases (56,000). 13 Local Permittees include the Western Riverside cities, the County of Riverside, County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County Regional Park and Open Space District, County Department of Waste Resources, and Riverside County Transportation Commission. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 10 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 4 MSHCP Goals by Area Plan Cities of Riverside and Norco 1,756 90 240 165 Eastvale 665 145 290 220 Elsinore 28,946 11,700 18,515 15,110 Harvest Valley / Winchester 820 430 605 515 Highgrove 1,452 345 675 510 Jurupa 5,476 890 1,870 1,380 Lake Mathews / Woodcrest 11,673 3,215 5,470 4,340 Lakeview / Nuevo 14,682 6,650 10,235 8,445 Mead Valley 7,703 1,885 3,635 2,760 Reche Canyon / Badlands 26,000 10,520 15,610 13,065 REMAP 78,423 41,400 58,470 49,935 San Jacinto Valley 32,828 11,540 19,465 15,500 Southwest Area 66,076 22,500 36,360 29,430 Sun City / Menifee Valley 2,059 1,120 1,585 1,355 Temescal Canyon 10,007 3,485 5,800 4,645 The Pass 22,652 8,540 13,925 11,230 Total 311,218 124,455 192,750 158,605 The MSHCP includes methods to determine whether the goals of the Plan are being met. One of the methods is measuring the extent to which conservation acquisitions are moving toward acquisition goals by each Area Plan.14 Area Plans are established in the County's General Plan and are used in the MSHCP as a common geographic unit in Western Riverside County. The MSHCP established low, high, and midpoint acquisition goals for each Area Plan based on biological needs. The midpoint acquisition goals for each Area Plan range from 165 to nearly 49,935 acres, as shown in Table 4. The midpoint goals sum to 158,605 which represents 5,605 acres more than are needed to fulfill the MSHCP goals. As a result, acquisitions in some Area Plans can fall below the mid -point targets while the total ARL can still achieve the 153,000-acre goal. MSHCP Financing Strategy One of the key requirements of the MSHCP, Implementing Agreement, and Incidental Take Permit (consistent with the requirements of the federal Endangered Species Act) is the provision of adequate funding by Local Permittees to the Implementing Entity (the Regional Conservation Authority) to conduct the conservation actions identified in the MSHCP as the responsibility of the Local Permittees. 14 Other geographic units include Rough Steps, city jurisdictions, and Area Plan subunits. For the purposes of this analysis, Area Plans have been selected as the primary unit of analysis because they are the middle-sized unit (smaller than Rough Steps and larger than Area Plan subunits) and have not changed over time (unlike jurisdictions, several of which have incorporated since the adoption of the MSHCP. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 11 ��.Wl VPPD.a .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Section 8.0 of the MSHCP addresses "MSHCP Funding/Financing of Reserve Assembly and Management." This section provides best estimates of Plan implementation costs at the time of Plan adoption, including the local funding commitment — the portion of Plan implementation costs that represents the Local Permittees' portion of the overall land acquisition, management, monitoring, adaptive management, and Plan administration costs. Section 8.5 describes the Local Funding Program. The Local Funding Program included a mix of funding sources to provide "an equitable distribution of the cost for local mitigation under the MSHCP." The proposed funding sources included Local Development Mitigation Fees, density bonus fees, regional infrastructure project public contributions (including transportation infrastructure, regional utility projects, local public capital construction projects, and regional flood control projects), and landfill tipping fees. Key components of the overall MSHCP implementation and funding strategy are highlighted below: • The Regional Conservation Authority would implement the MSHCP with funding from different sources. • The permanent protection of 97,000 acres in Additional Reserve Lands by Year 25 of the Plan (2029) would be achieved through direct purchase of habitat lands by the RCA using local funding and through the HANS dedication process.ls • Local funding sources would fund the ongoing management and maintenance costs of the local portion of the Additional Reserve Lands acquired through local funding (97,000 acres by end of acquisition period). • Local funding sources would fund monitoring activities on the pre -Plan local conservation and all the new Additional Reserve Lands (500,000 acers by end of acquisition period). • The permanent protection of 56,000 acres in Additional Reserve Lands by Year 25 would be achieved using state/federal funding sources or contributions. • State and federal funding sources would fund the management and maintenance costs of the State/federal portion of the required Additional Reserve Lands. • Local Development Mitigation Fees (on private development) would fund the Local Permittee MSHCP implementation costs that were not funded by other local/regional funding sources or public contributions for public development project mitigation. • The overall permit period was set at 75 years. Once habitat acquisition was completed by Year 25, remaining funds along with newly created revenue sources were to be used to fund is Section 6.1.1 of the MSHCP describes the HANS process. The Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) process applied to any property owner applying for a discretionary permit for land within a Criteria Area/Criteria Cell. Under the process, the County determined whether portions of the property are needed for conservation and then may send their evaluation to the RCA for Joint Project Review (JPR). During JPR, the project applicant negotiated the terms of the development and conservation of the project. The applicant also paid fees on the new development. This approach was refined when a new fee credit policy, adopted in 2016, provided for fee credits where appropriate lands are dedicated. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 12 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 monitoring and management as well as to fund the establishment of an endowment to cover ongoing post -permit costs (beyond Year 75). Importantly, the MSHCP funding chapter notes that frequent evaluations of the performance of the funding mechanisms and assessments of the funding plan will occur and that any necessary modifications to the funding mechanisms will be developed. MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources The original estimated costs and proposed funding sources were documented in the MSHCP and are summarized in Table S. These were developed based on research and analysis conducted as part of MSHCP development. As shown, Plan implementation costs over the first 25 years of implementation were estimated at about $950 million in 2004-dollar terms. Key assumptions driving the implementation cost estimates included: • Dedications. Direct acquisition using local funding sources would be required to acquire 56,000 acres, with 41,000 acres (or 42 percent) of the required local habitat protection coming through HANS dedication. • Land Cost. Average land value of $13,100 per acre for Additional Reserve Lands purchased by the RCA. • Management and Monitoring: Management and monitoring costs included three key components as follows: Reserve Management, Adaptive Management, and Biological Monitoring.16 • Program Administration. RCA program administration costs would average about $1.2 million each year in 2004 dollars during the 25-year period where land acquisition was required. • Cost Distribution. Overall, land acquisition costs were estimated at 77 percent of total implementation costs, with management and monitoring at 20 percent, and program administration at 3 percent (see Figure 2). 16 See Chapter 5 of the MSHCP for a description of these activities. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 13 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 5 2004 Estimates: MSHCP Implementation Costs and Funding Sources Local Permittee Land Requirements Preservation Requirement 97,000 acres 3,880 acres na HANS Dedication 41,000 acres 1,640 acres na Local Permittee Acquisition 56,000 acres 2,240 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs Land (1) $733,600,000 $29,344,000 76.91 % Management & Monitoring $190,200,000 $7,608,000 19.94% RCA Staff $30,000,000 $1,200,000 3.15% Other Costs na na na Endowment not included not included na Total Costs $953,800,000 $38,152,000 100.0% Local Revenues Private Development Mitigation Fees $539,600,000 $21,584,000 50.1% Density Bonus Fees $66,000,000 $2,640,000 6.1 % Regional Transportation Infra. (2) $250,000,000 $10,000,000 23.2% Local Roads (Measure A) $121,000,000 $4,840,000 (3) 11.2% Tipping Fees (4) $100,000,000 $4,000,000 9.3% Miscellaneous Revenues (5) $0 $0 0.0% Total Revenues $1,076,600,000 $43,064,000 100% (1) Average land value per acre assumed to be $13,100 per acre. (2) Public contributions at specificed % of new road construction. (3) $121 million to be provided over 10 years, so $12.1 million annually over that period. (4) Includes $90 million from El Sobrante Landfill and $10 million from other County landfills. (5) Other potential revenues, including public contributions from other public projects, tipping fees from Eagle Mountain Landfill, and potential new voter -approved regional funding were noted but not estimated. Source: Chapter 8 of MSHCP; Economic & Planning Systems. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 14a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Figure 2 MSHCP Estimated Annual Costs in Millions, 2004 Dollars Mangmnt. RCA Staff, & $1.2 , 3% Monitoring $7.6 , 20% $38.1 million total As also shown in Table 5, MSHCP funding from local/regional sources was estimated to be about $1.0 billion in 2004 dollars through Year 25, sufficient to cover the implementation costs over this period. Key assumptions driving the funding estimates included: • Measure A. Measure A (local sales tax transportation funding measure) would provide $121 million over 10 years in 2004-dollar terms. • Regional Transportation Funding. Public contributions from regional transportation infrastructure projects would provide an average of $10 million each year or $250 million through Year 25. • Tipping Fees. Landfill tipping fees would provide about $100 million in revenue over 25 years, about $4 million each year, primarily from the El Sobrante landfill. • Mitigation Fees. Private development fees, including private development mitigation fees and density bonus fees, would generate over $600 million over the first 25 years, about $24 million annually. • Development Forecast and Participation. The forecast of private development fees was based on a preliminary fee schedule and the forecast of 336,000 new residential units (13,440 units each year) and 371 acres each year of commercial and industrial development. All new development was assumed to pay the private development mitigation fee with a portion paying the density bonus fee. • Other Funding Options. Potential additional funding might come through contributions from other local/regional public entities, other landfills, or new voter -approved funding initiatives. • Funding Distribution. Overall, about 55 percent of the estimated funding was expected to be generated by private development fees, with 45 percent from other funding sources. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 15 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Figure 3 MSHCP Estimated Annual Revenues in Millions, 2004 Dollars Local Roads (Mess. A) , $4.8 , 11 Regional Transp. Infra., $10.0, 23% Tipping Fees, $4.0 , 1 no/- Density Bonus Fees, $2.6 , 6% $43.3 million total Development Mitigation Fees and Calculation The MSHCP notes that "new development affects the environment directly through construction activity and cumulatively through population bases that result from Development." As a result, the cities and County are required to implement a Local Development Mitigation Fee that was expected to represent one of the primary sources of funding for the implementation of the MSHCP. The MSHCP indicates that the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be adopted under California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the "Mitigation Fee Act") that "allows cities and counties to charge new development for the costs of mitigating the impacts of new development." The MSHCP identified preliminary estimates of Local Development Mitigation Fees and indicated that these mitigation fees were expected to generate the majority of funding for Local Permittee obligations. The MSHCP noted that, under the Mitigation Fee Act, "a nexus study is required to demonstrate that the proposed fee is proportionate to the impacts of new development." The Mitigation Fee Act also includes a number of reviewing and reporting requirements. The MSHCP also notes that the fee will need to be "reevaluated and revised should it be found to insufficiently cover mitigation of new development." A nexus study entitled "Final Mitigation Fee Nexus Study Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan" was completed on July 1, 2003 (2003/Original Nexus Study). This nexus study conducted a detailed analysis of the costs of implementing the Plan, identified the Local Permittee funding obligations, determined the portion to be funded through the Local Development Mitigation Fee, and made the necessary nexus findings under the Mitigation Fee Act. The MSHCP and 2003 Nexus Study both indicated that all new development in the Western Riverside County Plan Area affects covered species and habitat and so the Local Development Mitigation Fees would apply to all new development in participating jurisdictions in Western Riverside County. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 16 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Mitigation Fee Schedule and Adjustments All local jurisdictions participating in the MSHCP and obtaining coverage for public and private take in their jurisdictions were required to adopt and implement this mitigation fee schedule through ordinance and resolution and then to pass through the fee funding (minus any additional administrative charges) to the RCA to fund MSHCP implementation. Indexed -increases based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Los Angeles -Anaheim -Riverside area were provided for in the ordinances to allow modest adjustments in mitigation fees to respond to inflationary cost increases. Due to the geographic revision implemented by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, going forward indexed -adjustments will be based on the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario area. Table 6 shows the original 2004 Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule and current 2021 Fee schedule that reflects periodic inflationary fee adjustments using the indexing process. Table 6 2004 and 2021 MSHCP Fee Schedule Residential: Up to 8.0 dwellin units per acre (DUAC) Residential: 8.0-14.0 DUAC Residential: 14.0+ DUAC Commercial (per acre) Industrial (per acre) 004 Fee per unit or per acre 2021 Fee per unit or per acre Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 17a aw000aa��;M,�o=onw; �„�eKxne� a .o ;a�.��Moo��=� aYF;a 3�zoo.d 3. HABITAT PROTECTION TO DATE AND FUTURE CONSERVATION SCENARIO The RCA has achieved substantial levels of habitat protection to date using the funding sources established and the associated variable flows of incoming revenues. The level of habitat protection achieved, because of lower levels of funding and land dedication than expected, has however fallen behind the pace of protection forecast in the Original Nexus Study. This chapter summarizes the achieved protection to (1) establish both the scale of future acquisitions required to meet the overall Additional Reserve Land (ARL) goals, (2) consider the annual pace of habitat protection through acquisitions and dedications in absolute terms and relative to the original MSHCP forecasts, and (3) inform the development of the Conservation Scenario that forms the baseline (project description) for estimating future MSHCP implementation costs and associated funding requirements and updated mitigation fees. Habitat Protection Accomplishments Through 2019 Between the start of the MSHCP program and the end of 2019, the most recent full calendar year, about 40 percent of the 153,000-acre ARL target has been achieved, totaling almost 62,000 acres in acquisitions, easements, or dedications (see Table 7).17 As shown of the 97,000 acres in Local Permittee ARL obligation about 40,200 acres had been protected by the end of 2019. Of the 56,000 acres in State/Federal ARL obligation, about 21,600 acres have been protected to date. Table 7 Conservation Through End of 2019 Local State + Fed Total 97,000 4,531 35,681 40,212 56,788 56,000 12,408 9,200 21,608 34,392 153,000 16,939 44,881 61,820 91,180 Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority MSHCP Annual Reports; RCA information on 2019 purchases; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Conservation Goals and Progress The MSHCP anticipated that acquisition would take place for 25 years, through the end of 2029, with 97,000 acres conserved through local means and 56,000 acres conserved with State/federal funding. To achieve this goal, an average of 6,120 acres of conservation is required each year, 17 Note that while the MSHCP was adopted in 2004, certain conservation which took place between 2000 and 2003 was counted toward the MSHCP reserve. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 18. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 including an average of 3,880 annually from local funding sources/dedications and 2,240 annually from State and federal conservation. Figure 4 illustrates how steady progress would result in achievement of the ARL goals by 2029. Figure 5 shows actual progress toward the goals, through 2019. More than 21,000 acres have been conserved through State/federal means, and over 40,000 acres have been conserved through local actions. These totals sum to about 40 percent of the total ARL goal of 153,000 acres. As shown in Figure 5, with 16 years of the 25-year acquisition period completed, the ARL acquisitions have fallen behind the pace forecast in the Original Nexus Study. Protection through the end of 2019 represents 63 percent of the original forecast (65 percent for Local obligations and 60 percent for State/federal obligations). For the Local Permittee obligations, as discussed further below, the lower level of land dedication relative to the original forecasts account for much of the habitat protection gap that has emerged over the last 16 years. Figure 4 MSHCP Conservation Goals, 2019 and 2029 Goals Highlighted 180,000 — 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 MSHCP Goals, 2019 and 2028 Highlighted V) lD I� M M O -1 N M � V) lD I- M M O r-I N M 1- Vl lD I� M O O O O O O r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I .-I r-I r-I N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N " N N N N N N . N N N N " N N N N N N N N N N Local State/Fed Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 19 230-0— Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Figure 5 Progress Towards ARL Through End of 2019 100,000 100% 90,000 153,000 90% 80,000 80% 70,000 65% 6 70% 60% 60,000 60% u 50,000 41% 97'000 / 50% Q u 39% 40,000 40% 30,000 56,000 30% 20,000 20% 10,000 10% - 0% Fed+State Local Total ■ Acclu. through 2019 21,608 40,212 61,820 ro Remaining Need 34,392 56,788 91,180 • of 2019 Expected Goal Achieved 60% 65% 63% • of Total Goal Achieved 39% 41% 40% Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Land Dedications The MSHCP envisioned a conservation program where land and easements would be purchased by the RCA and land would be dedicated to the RCA through the development process.18 In addition, the potential for no -cost and low-cost donations for tax benefit purposes was also created. The MSHCP did not assume donations or conservation easement acquisitions as part of its financial analysis (this is appropriate given the limited number of such transactions). The MSHCP did, however, anticipate that 41,000 acres would be conserved through dedications, 56,000 acres through purchases on behalf of local permittees, and 56,000 acres through purchases conducted by or funded by federal and State agencies/sources for a total of 153,000 acres. For the local portion of the goal (97,000 acres), this translates into about 42 percent of the goal conserved via dedications associated with the development review process —called Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS)—and the other 58 percent purchased by the RCA from willing sellers. The level of dedication is a key assumption for the MSHCP implementation cost estimate as each acre dedicated through HANS is one fewer acre which must be conserved through land acquisitions at market values. The HANS process was established to apply to developments proposed within the Criteria Cells of the MSHCP Study Area. The Criteria Cells represent areas with high conservation values relative to the areas outside of the Criteria Cells. The HANS process was designed to indicate what conservation (dedication) may be needed from new development from a biological needs 18 This process is known as the Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS). Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 20 uu u .=ma.wvvo==w�nn �o orc wmeaw vrve xne o e r.o naa wa vsnoo x� smer_F; zaa zozo.ao� Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 perspective. Subsequent to that technical analysis, applicants could then proceed to the Joint Project Review (JPR) process during which the parties negotiate an implementation plan for the project, consistent with the HANS findings. The applicants would also pay mitigation fees on the actual development. To date, a modest amount of land (less than 1,000 acres) has been conserved via the HANS/JPR method compared to the 26,000 acres that was forecast to have occurred by this point in the MSHCP implementation. While very little land has been dedicated to the RCA through HANS/JPR, several projects went through the HANS/JPR process and have agreements in place for dedication/conservation of lands, but the start date (if any) for these projects is unknown (i.e., may be far in the future). These projects cover about 35,000 acres in the Criteria Cells and, under the JPR agreements, have set aside about 30 percent of that total or about 10,000 acres for conservation/dedication. The adoption of Resolution No. 2016-003 in September 2016 revised the RCA's fee credit and waiver policy. This resolution indicated that MSHCP fee credit should be provided in exchange for land that contributes to reserve assembly. As a result, after the adoption of this resolution, new development is not be expected to pay mitigation fees and dedicate land in the manner originally envisioned in the MSHCP limiting the likelihood of the types of dedications envisioned in the Original Nexus Study. Future Conservation Scenario This updated financial analysis, nexus study, and mitigation fees estimate require a base description of the additional habitat protection required. In subsequent chapters, cost estimates are developed in reference to, and in application to, this conservation scenario to develop the overall implementation costs and the associated funding required, both in aggregate and through time during the land acquisition period of the program. Four questions are of particular importance: 1. Remaining Habitat Protection. The amount of habitat protection required to meet the MSHCP requirements. 2. Dedications. The amount of land dedication assumed to occur through the HANS/JPR process over the habitat protection period and the associated amount of habitat that must be acquired. 3. Time Frame. The period over which habitat protection goals must be met. 4. Land Characteristics. The characteristics of the land to be protected to meet MSHCP requirements (e.g., goals by Area Plan, habitat cores and linkages etc., land use designations and parcel sizes). The answers to question 1 are provided in the data above (see Table 7). The answer to question 4 is provided in the subsequent chapter on land costs, with illustrative answers coming from RCA data and GIS analysis. The answer to question 2 is addressed below and is based on information on accomplishments to date (described above), discussions with RCA staff, the current Fee Waiver and Credit Policy, and an assessment of realistic opportunities and expectations. Finally, question 3 raises the issue of whether an extension to the MSHCP land acquisition implementation period should be provided. As described below, three different Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 21 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 extension scenarios (5-, 10-, and 15-year extension scenarios) are evaluated, as well as the baseline, "No Extension Scenario," to indicate the outcomes under different scenarios. Habitat Protection, Land Dedication, and Conservation Scenarios As shown in Table 8, there is a total of about 91,200 acres of land protection still required to complete the land protection obligations under the MSHCP and to bring the Additional Reserve Lands to 153,000 acres. Of this, the State/federal requirements is for about 34,400 acres, while the Local Permittee requirement is for about 56,800 acres. The experience of the last 16 years indicates that the MSHCP was overly optimistic in terms of land dedications, assuming that 41,000 acres would be dedicated to the RCA. As noted above, about 10,000 acres of potential future land dedication is associated with a range of previously proposed projects. Based on historical information on actual, dedications agreements on proposed projects, current RCA policy, and consultations with RCA staff, minimal additional dedication is expected or assumed. This analysis, therefore, assumes that the prior agreement concerning dedications, summing to about 10,000 acres, will be secured over the next eight years and prior to the end of the current habitat protection period. Even if the implementation period were extended, no extra land dedication is forecast to occur. As a result, and as shown in Table 8, a total of about 46,800 acres of Additional Reserve Land acquisition is required by Local Permittees for MSHCP implementation once the forecast of dedications is incorporated. As shown in Table 8, the required average annual pace of habitat protection varies considerably under the different acquisition period extension scenarios, as described below: 19 • Baseline/No Extension Scenario. As currently structured, RCA is required to complete land acquisition by the end of Year 25 of Plan implementation in 2029. This provides nine (9) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 5,200 acres each year. • 5-Year Extension. With a 5-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 30 of Plan implementation in 2034. This provides fourteen (14) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 3,300 acres each year. 10-Year Extension. With a 10-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 35 of Plan implementation in 2039 This provides nineteen (19) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 2,500 acres each year. 19 As a point of reference, the historical pace of Local Perm ittee-d riven habitat protection has been somewhat above 2,000 acres each year with availability of funding being an important determinant of the pace of acquisition. The pace of State/federal-driven acquisition has averaged about 1,000 acres each year. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 22 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 15-Year Extension. With a 15-year extension to the acquisition period, the RCA would be required to complete land acquisitions by the end of Year 40 of Plan implementation in 2044. This provides twenty-four (24) years to protect the 47,000 acres through direct land acquisition (distinct from the assumed dedications), an average annual acquisition pace of about 2,000 acres each year. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 23 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 8 Required Acquisition Acres to Achieve ARL Goals NO EXTENSION State/Federal 21,608 34,392 9 3,821 56,000 Local HANS Dedication (1) 715 10,000 9 1,111 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 39,497 46,788 9 5,199 86,285 Total Local Conservation 40,212 56,788 9 6,310 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 61,820 91,180 9 10,131 153,000 5 YEAR EXTENSION State/Federal 14 2,457 56,000 Local HANS Dedication See above 14 714 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 14 3,342 86,285 Total Local Conservation 14 4,056 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 14 6,513 153,000 10 YEAR EXTENSION State/Federal 19 1,810 56,000 Local HANS Dedication See above 19 526 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 19 2,463 86,285 Total Local Conservation 19 2,989 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 19 4,799 153,000 15 YEAR EXTENSION State/Federal 24 1,433 56,000 Local HANS Dedication See above 24 417 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 24 1,950 86,285 Total Local Conservation 24 2,366 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 24 3,799 153,000 20 YEAR EXTENSION State/Federal 29 1,186 56,000 Local HANS Dedication See above 29 345 10,715 Net Local Acquisition 29 1,613 86,285 Total Local Conservation 29 1,958 97,000 State/Federal + Local = ARL Goal 29 3,144 153,000 1. About 10,000 acres of potential future land dedication is associated with a range of previously proposed projects. Based on historical information on actual, dedications agreements on proposed projects, current RCA policy, and consultations with RCA staff, minimal additional dedication is expected or assumed beyond these agreements. This analysis, therefore, assumes that the prior agreements concerning dedications will occur with future dedications summing to about 10,000 acres. The precise timing of these dedications is uncertain, but are assumed to occur over the next eight years. Average annual numbers in this table are shown distributed across the full remaining acquisition period of each extension scenario. Shading indicates acreage to be acquired with fee revenue. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24 ��.Wla�IVPPDa'�.l� ���.„��e� �'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d 4, FORECASTS OF DEVELOPMENT, DEDICATION, FEE PAYMENT Future development within Western Riverside County will both reduce land available for conservation while also serving as a primary funding mechanism for habitat acquisitions. This chapter identifies forecasts of future growth in Western Riverside County and develops an associated forecast of land development that is a key component of the fee calculation. Historic Development and HCP Fees The MSHCP anticipated that 13,000 to 14,000 residential units and about 370 commercial and industrial acres would be developed on average annually. Specifically, between 2005 and 2019, 206,000 residential units were expected in the Plan Area. A review of new units in the Plan Area indicates about 130,000 units were developed over the period (see Figure 6), about 37 percent below the forecast.20 While the substantial volatility in the real estate market over the period (including the housing boom, deep recession, and modest recovery) may explain some of this difference, the slower pace of development means that fee revenues have been similarly constrained relative to the original revenue projections. Figure 6 Residential Unit Development, Western Riverside County, 2005-2019 250,000 200,000 25 150,000 v ;a v 0 100,000 v E 3 z X 76,000 Source: California Department of Finance; MSHCP Projections Projected Actual 20 Actual units developed have been derived from the California Department of Finance (DOF), Demographics Unit information through January 1, 2019. Note that the DOF reports data by city and for the entire Riverside County unincorporated area. Western Riverside's portion of the total unincorporated area has been derived based on the area's historic share of unincorporated County, taking into account the incorporations of new cities that occurred in Western Riverside County since MSHCP Plan adoption (Eastvale, Jurupa Valley, Menifee, and Wildomar). Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 25 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Growth Projections SCAG Forecasts in Context The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)21 representing six counties, 191 cities and more than 18 million residents. MPOs, such as SCAG are charged under California Senate Bill 375 with developing Sustainable Community Strategies (SCSs) as part of regional transportation plans. SCAG's SCS includes population, household, and job projections through 2040 by city and unincorporated area. SCAG consults with local governments within the region, including the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) which represents Western Riverside County, to develop the projections. SCAG adopted the 2012-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Community Strategy (RTP/SCS) in 2016. The 2016 RTP/SCS forms the basis of the SCAG projections; EPS extrapolated an annual growth rate from the SCAG projections and, assuming consistent development trends through 2050, applied the rate in order to estimate development projections through 2050. SCAG forecasts for the future, on an annualized basis, were compared with the MSHCP's original forecast along with historical information (when available) as described further below: • Residential Development Forecast. Figure 7 shows, for Western Riverside County, the annual residential unit count for SCAG projections through 2050, MSHCP projections through 2029, and residential units produced in Western Riverside County between 2005 and 2019. As shown, the SCAG projections suggest about 8,750 units each. This is similar to the average annual historic pace of growth between 2005 and 2019 of about 9,260 units, but well below the original MSHCP projections of about 13,400 units each year. Based on the similarity between the historical average and the SCAG forecast, the SCAG forecast is considered a reasonable basis for determining the future pace of residential development and associated residential land development (based on assumed densities of development). Commercial Development Forecast. The SCAG jobs forecast of about 15,000 jobs each year was converted into an annual gross amount of commercial/industrial development using the employment density and FAR assumptions used in the most recent Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) update documents. As shown in Figure 8, this results in a forecast of about 690 acres of commercial/industrial land development each year (representing an overall average of about 21 jobs per acre of development), considerably above the original MSHCP projections of about 370 acres each year. The higher SCAG number, however, appears reasonable given recent and ongoing trends in Western Riverside County where substantial amounts of new logistics/distribution development have occurred covering substantial land areas and, as such, is considered reasonable as the basis of the future forecast of commercial/industrial land development. 21 Federal law requires that an urbanized area with a population of at least 50,000 be guided by a regional entity known as an MPO. California's Senate Bill 375 expands the role of the State's 18 MPOs to include regional plans that help the State reach its greenhouse gas reduction targets by encouraging compact development and new development near public transit. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 26 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Figure 7 New Housing Units per Year, SCAG and MSHCP Projections and Historic Production (2005-2019) SCAG (2012-2040) and MSHCP Projections (2004-2029) and Historic Production (2005-2019) 16,000 1 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,747 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 13,440 PF I SCAG MSHCP Figure 8 Newly Developed Commercial Acres per Year SCAG (2012-2040) and MSHCP Projections 800 693 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 SCAG Note: SCAG job projections converted into acres by EPS Historic MSHCP Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 27 ��.Wla�IVPPD.I�.l� �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Forecasts for Fee Calculation For this fee program update, the SCAG projections are considered a reasonable basis for forecasting future land development. Because all new development is expected to pay the mitigation fee, all of the forecasted household and job growth is converted into a land development forecast that is, in turn, used to calculate the mitigation fees. Table 9 shows SCAG's overall projections for households and employment in Western Riverside County between 2012 and 2050, and Table 10 shows the implied average annual land development rates, and, in turn, the overall level of residential and commercial/industrial land development that would be expected to occur through the end of the land acquisition period for each of the extension scenarios.22 As shown, all scenarios assume an overall average annual land development of 2,252 acres each year, including 693 acres in commercial/industrial land development and 1,558 acres in annual residential land development.23 • Baseline/No Extension Scenario. Under the no extension scenario, a total of 20,265 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of nine (9) years and would pay the mitigation fees. • 5-Year Extension. Under the 5-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 31,523 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 14 years and would pay the mitigation fees. • 10-Year Extension. Under the 10-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 42,782 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 19 years and would pay the mitigation fees. • 15-Year Extension. Under the 15-year extension to the acquisition period, a total of 54,040 acres of land development is expected to occur during the remaining Plan implementation period of 24 years and would pay the mitigation fees. 22 Under the MSHCP, all new development is required to pay the mitigation fee and contribute to funding the implementation of the MSHCP except where specifically exempted in the Ordinance. 23 The 1,558 acres of residential land development was derived based on the forecasted 8,747 residential units each year and assumptions concerning distribution by density category and an average density level. More specifically, consistent with the recent TUMF analysis assumptions, 70 percent of new residential units are assumed to be in the low density category (less than 8 units per acre) with an average of 4.5 units/acre, 20 percent are assumed to be the medium density category (8 to 16 units per acre) with an average of 10.8 units/acre, and 10 percent are assumed to be the high density category (over 16 units per acre) with an average of 24.4 units/acre. The unit per acre factors are consistent with those indicated in the Original Nexus Study. The overall implied average residential density is 5.6 units/gross acre. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 28 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 9 Projected Growth in Western Riverside County, through 2050 2012 530,970 463,833 2040 Projection 775,882 869,792 2050 Projection (1) 863,350 1,014,777 New Households/Jobs Expected by 2050 332,380 550,944 Average Annual 8,747 14,499 (1) SCAG projections forecast growth through 2040. EPS assumes the annual growth rate from 2012 to 2040 remains constant through 2050 and applies the rate to an additional 10 years in order to project growth through 2050. Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 29a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 10 Projected Developed Acres in Western Riverside County, by Extension Scenario PF SCAG L J Proportionate Share 2020-2028' New Development to Acres2 Acres of New Development Through 2028 Acres per Year Proportionate Share 2020-2034' New Development to Acres2 Acres of New Development Through 2034 Acres per Year Proportionate Share 2020-2038' New Development to Acres2 Acres of New Development Through 2038 Acres per Year Proportionate Share 2020-2043' New Development to Acres2 Acres of New Development Through 2043 Acres per Year Western Riverside IVISHCP Plan Area .-.... Non Residential No Extension 78,722 Households 130,487 Jobs 14,026 Acres 6,239 Acres 20,265 Acres 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres 5 Year Extension 122,456 Households 202,979 Jobs 21,818 Acres 9,705 Acres 31,523 Acres 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres 10 Year Extension 166,190 Households 275,472 Jobs 29,611 Acres 13,171 Acres 42,782 Acres 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres 15 Year Extension 209,924 Households 347,965 Jobs 37,403 Acres 16,637 Acres 54,040 Acres 1,558 Acres 693 Acres 2,252 Acres (1) SCAG forecasts from the 2016 Report have been used for all cities in Western Riverside County. The projections for the entire unincorporated area in Riverside have been split into just the Western part of the County through a review of WRCOG's recent proportion of unincorporated growth, compared to the whole County. (2) Conversion from household projections to residential acres of developed land is based on expected development mix and average residential density by land use type, with an average residential density of 5.6 DUAC. Similarly, conversion from job projections to nonresidential acres of developed land is based on distribution of jobs by workspace type and average employment density by land use type, with an average nonresidential density of 21 jobs per land acre. Residential density assumptions are based on data from the Census and California Department of Finance; Employment density assumptions are based on SCAG data. Sources: California Department of Finance; US Census Bureau; Southern California Association of Governments; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 30a aw000aa��M,�o=onw; �„�eKxne� a .o a�.��Moo��=� aYF;a 3�zoo.d 5. MSHCP IMPLEMENTATION COSTS This chapter describes the analysis and assumptions that underpin the estimation of the total remaining MSHCP implementation costs in 2019 dollars. Key cost factors evaluated include land costs, management and monitoring costs, administration and professional services costs, and endowment costs. Together these cost components form the total MSHCP implementation costs. Because the duration allowed for land acquisition and endowment establishment affect several of these cost items, distinct total implementation cost estimates are provided for all scenarios (i.e., Baseline/ No Extension and the three extension scenarios). Land Costs Planning -level estimates of the per acre values associated with potential Additional Reserve Land (ARL) acquisitions are a critical input into the estimation of total land acquisition costs associated with Plan implementation. Land acquisition costs represented the majority of the original estimates of MSHCP implementation costs. This chapter provides planning -level estimates of per acre land conservation costs in 2019-dollar terms based on available information. In combination with assumptions concerning the characteristics of the Additional Reserve Lands to be acquired and potential levels of dedication, the per acre land value estimates drive the estimate of overall land acquisition costs. Actual per acre habitat conservation costs may vary from the average planning -level estimates presented in this chapter for a number of reasons, including differences in the specific characteristics of the actual parcels acquired as well as fluctuations in economic, real estate, and land market conditions over time. Individual transactions will require appraisals to establish their value at the time of acquisition based on parcel characteristics and pertinent market conditions at the time of appraisal. Over time, per acre and overall cost estimates typically change for a number of reasons as discussed further in Chapter 9. MSHCP/Original Nexus Study The initial adoption of the mitigation fees was based on a nexus study completed in July 2003 that included a land valuation analysis that was completed in December 2002. The land valuation analysis assumed the acquisition of vacant and unentitled lands in the Criteria Cells. The land value analysis provided planning -level estimates of per acre land values by grouped land use designation and by Area Plan. Planning -level land value estimates were based on sales comparables. The land value estimates indicated per acre land values that were primarily driven by differentiation in land use category. The land use designation categories represent groupings of the broad number of land use designations present in the Study Area. Table 11 summarizes the per -acre land value ranges and resulting averages. Based on this analysis, an overall weighted average of $13,100 per acre was applied in the MSHCP financial sections in the Original Nexus Study. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 31 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 11 Per -Acre Land Value Estimates-2003 Dollars (2003 Nexus Study) Land Use Designation Value Range Resulting Average Open Space $2,500 to $10,000 per acre $ 8,000 per acre Rural/Agricultural $5,000 to $25,000 per acre $11,000 per acre Community Development $20,000 to $80,000 per acre $45,000 per acre Overall (1) $2,500 to $80,000 per acre Varied (1) * Per acre values rounded to the nearest 1,000. (1) Reported overall average land value per acre depends on mix of land types. Number varies by documents, though $13,100 per acre was overall value applied in the MSHCP financing sections. Source: Original 2003 Nexus Study RCA Experience to Date Table 12 summarizes average RCA land acquisition costs to date. Including land purchased shortly before the MSHCP was adopted through the end of 2018, costs for Local Permittee land acquisitions summed to $352.5 million in nominal dollar terms, an average of $9,400 per acre. However, for the year 2018, about 2,100 acres were acquired at the higher average per acre cost of $13,200 per acre. Table 12 Local Conservation Costs Through 2018 I Total Acres Acquired (1) 37,547 2,066 Total Cost (millions) $352.5 $27.4 Cost per Acre (Nominal $s) $9,400 $13,200 (1) Includes all acres purchased; does not include acres conserved via easement. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority MSHCP Annual Report 2018; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. To date, the overall historical level of per acre land acquisition expenditures is well below the original 2004 per acre land value estimates. The cost of RCA acquisitions during this timeframe were kept relatively low by concentrating more on lower cost parcels (larger parcels in remote areas with limited development potential). In 2018, as in the future, the average cost per acre is expected to be higher than this historical average due to the characteristics of land still needing to be acquired. New Land Value Analysis and Conclusions New 2019 per acre land value estimates were developed based on recent historical transactions as reported in the sales comparables sections of appraisals conducted for RCA acquisitions. This data set provided a substantial inventory of over 150 land sales between 2012 and 2017 that supported conclusions concerning per acre land values by key land value characteristic. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 32 ��.Wl VPPD.a .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy-�L�� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Similar to the Original Nexus Study, land values were determined to be substantially affected by land use designation and by parcel size. Land values were developed for twelve different value categories based on combinations of three land use designations and four different size ranges. Based on the land valuation data and detailed GIS analysis by RCA staff, parcels were divided into three groups of development potential based on their land use designation:24 • Open Space. Low development potential land use designations included open space, rural mountainous, and rural residential. • Rural. Medium development potential land use designations include agriculture and rural communities land use designations. • Community Development. High development potential land use designations include all community development designations, including residential, non-residential, and other community development designations. In addition to these three land use designation groupings reflecting different levels of development potential, parcels were also divided by parcel size. The land value information indicated a per acre value distinction between the following parcels sizes: • Parcels less than 5 acres. • Parcels between 5 and 20 acres. • Parcels between 20 and 80 acers. • Parcels over 80 acres. Based on the analysis of the sales comparables, Table 13 shows the planning level per acre land value by land use designation grouping/size range in 2017 dollars. Table 13 Planning Level Per Acre Land Value Estimates by Category I" Land Use Designation Open Space $11,761 $5,091 $3,949 $1,866 Rural $33,363 $11,553 $8,337 $5,531 Community Development $177,414 $76,050 $72,369 $24,335 1. Most land sale comparables used for pricing are from 2013 to 2017 and were converted to 2017 dollars using BLS CPI adjustments for the Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County area. Sources: Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 24 RCA staff developed a consistent set of land use designation categories across different jurisdictions in the Study Area for the purposes of this study. These formed the basis of the development potential categories. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 33 ��.Wl w000.Ia .11�.„�Kxn. ��'.o.WWMMoo���ldy-�L�� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 The average land value per acre for future RCA acquisitions is dependent on the different land values per acre as well as the expected distribution of future acquisitions. The actual land to be acquired is uncertain and is dependent on the availability of land through willing sellers. However, based on the conservation needs by Area Plan, the suitable land available for protection, as well as the specific linkages that must be created between the core reserve areas, RCA staff provided sufficient information for EPS to develop a general expression of parcels by characteristic to support the land value analysis. An illustration of the expected distribution of acres by land use designation and size range is provided in Table 14. Table 14 Illustrative Distribution of Land Acquisitions by Land Use and Size Open Space 535 1,531 3,626 4,654 10,346 Rural 1,901 17,241 26,802 29,428 75,371 Community Development 638 1,707 3,613 4,384 10,342 Total Purchases by Acreage 3,074 20,479 34,041 38,466 96,059 1. Conservation scenario analysis was conducted in 2017 so overall acres acquired more than those required as of end of 2019. Sources: RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Applying the per acre land values in Table 13 to the illustrative land conservation distribution in Table 14 provides an estimate of the aggregate land value, supporting the estimate of the average planning level land value per acre in 2017-dollar terms (see Table 15). Table 15 Aggregate Land Value of Remaining Areas (2017 dollars) Open Space $6,292,633 $7,795,633 $14,319,467 $8,682,942 $37,090,674 Rural $63,411,345 $199,183,566 $223,437,526 $162,777,034 $648,809,470 Community Development $113,198,910 $129,817,405 $261,456,200 $106,682,740 $611,155,254 Total Cost of Purchases $182,902,887 $336,796,603 $499,213,192 $278,142,716 $1,297,055,399 % of Total 14% 26% 38% 21 % 100% 1. This table is the average land value per acre multiplied by the Conservation Scenario. See Table E-1 and E-2. Sources: RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 34a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 As shown in Table 15, the aggregate land value of the approximately 96,000 acres remaining to be protected as part of the MSHCP as of 2017 is estimated at about $1.3 billion in 2017 dollars. This represents an average land value of about $13,500 per acre. To convert this land value into 2019 dollars terms (similar to the rest of the analysis), EPS indexed the value to about $14,300 per acre in 2019-dollar terms.25 Other Costs —Administration, Management, and Monitoring Program administration, reserve management, and reserve monitoring are required functions that require annual funding. The forecasts for each of these cost categories are described below. Administration and Professional Service Costs The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority is responsible for implementing the MSHCP. Since 2004, RCA staff members have directed the acquisition, management, and monitoring of the local portion of the Additional Reserve Land (ARL) required by the MSHCP, monitored State and federal Public/Quasi-Public lands and the State and federal portions of the ARL, and undertook all of the administrative tasks associated with maintaining the permit. Costs categorized in this fee study under MSHCP administration include all RCA staff costs and other costs like building rents and average expenditures on non -acquisition related professional services that are not anticipated to vary as the size of the ARL increases. The forecast for the acquisition period assumes that these costs will remain at approximately $4.2 million in constant 2019 dollars, increasing with inflation but not increasing as the size of the ARL grows (see Table 16). This includes salaries and benefits of about $2.3 million annually and about $1.5 million in professional services, supplies, and other costs. 25 Two years of inflation (2017 - 2019) based on by BLS CPI adjustment for Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Metro Area. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 35 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 16 Administrative and Professional Services Costs Total Salaries and Employee Benefits $2,219,261 $2,288,495 Professional Services and Supplies Environmental Legal $394,320 $406,621 Auditing, Accounting & Financial Services $101,717 $104,891 GIS Services $10,000 $10,312 Personnel Services $13,920 $14,354 Real Estate Services $653,774 $674,169 Other Services $247,979 $255,715 Subtotal $1,421,710 $1,466,062 Other Charges $388,145 $400,254 Total $4,029,116 $4,154,811 (1) Three year average CPI -adjusted by one year, the average of the annual CPI adjustments for the three years. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Bureau of Labor Statistics; Management and Monitoring Reserve Management The MSHCP describes reserve management activities focused on maintaining and improving habitat conditions and ecosystem functions including habitat and landscape -based activities and species -specific activities. For the purposes of this analysis, the average per acre cost estimate for Reserve Management as reported in the RCA actual spending for FY 2018-19 has been used to inform cost projections through the full acquisition period. Because RCA staff and relevant contractors have indicated that the current spending on staff capacity is not adequate to accomplish necessary management with existing land holdings, additional staffing and associated expenditures have been added to the current reserve management expenditures. Specifically, three new full time equivalent (FTE) positions are added to the current 2019 spending for reserve management. Overall, the 2019 per acre reserve management cost of $25.39 per acre was adjusted to $32.70 per acre (2019 dollars) to account for three new mid -level park ranger FTEs. While as of the end of 2019 about 40,200 acres were under management, ultimately, reserve management activities will cover the entire 97,000 acres to be acquired by the RCA. Biological Monitoring The purpose of biological monitoring is to provide Reserve Managers with information and data upon which reserve management decisions will be made. According to the MSHCP, the monitoring program must provide "sufficient, scientifically reliable data for Reserve Managers to assess the MSHCP's effectiveness at meeting resource objectives and achieving or maintaining a Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 36 ��.Wl VPPD.a .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy-�L�� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 healthy MSHCP Conservation Area in perpetuity." Unlike the RCA's reserve management activities which are limited to local ARL acres, the RCA will ultimately be responsible for monitoring all 500,000 acres of the reserve lands mandated under the MSHCP. The acreage currently being monitored totals roughly 408,000 acres. For the purposes of this analysis, the $1.1 million annual cost estimate based on FY 2018-19 actual spending was used to inform cost projections through the full acquisition period. Because current staff capacity is not adequate to accomplish necessary biological monitoring with existing land holdings, to address the additional land acquisitions, two new full time equivalent (FTE) positions are added to the current 2019 spending for reserve monitoring. The 2019 per acre reserve monitoring cost of $2.67 was adjusted to $3.01 (2019 dollars) to account for two new entry-level biologist FTEs. (see Table 17). This constant dollar per acre cost was assumed to apply throughout the period of implementation. Reserve Management and Biological Monitoring Costs Table 17 summarizes estimated per acre costs for reserve management and monitoring in 2019 dollars. Applying these per acre costs (in 2019 dollars) to current acreage under management and monitoring projects results in annual costs of $1.32 million and $1.23 million, respectively. The annual reserve management and biological monitoring costs increase as new acquisitions occur. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 37 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 17 Management and Monitoring Anticipated Costs in 2004 and 2019 Dollars Reserve Management' Acres under Management 40,212 Existing Reserve Management Expenses $1,021,000 Additional Staff Capacity Required 294 000 Total Reserve Management Expenses $1,315,000 $/Acre $32.70 $/Acre without additional staff capacity $25.39 Biological Monitoring2 Acres being Monitored 408,820 Existing Biological Monitoring Expenses $1,092,000 Additional Staff Capacity Required 140 000 Total Biological Monitoring Expenses $1,232,000 $/Acre $3.01 $/Acre without additional staff capacity $2.67 1. Reserve Management costs include Parks & Open Space contract fees, maintenance of motor vehicles, and HOA dues. 2. Biological Monitoring costs include SAWA contract fees, office and computer supplies, training, private mileage reimbursement, building rent, and rental vehicles/fuel. 3. Current staff capacity is not sufficient to accomplish necessary management and monitoring. An Expanded staff capacity scenario envisions adding 3 FTE mid- level park rangers to Reserve Management and 2 FTE entry-level biologists to Reserve Monitoring, with salaries and benfits of $98,000 and $70,000 Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Endowment Funding The overall permit period was set at 75 years, ending in 2079. To cover ongoing management and monitoring costs beyond the duration when mitigation fees will be collected, the establishment of a non -depleting endowment is required. In other words, the endowment must be sufficient such that expected average interest revenues (after inflation and transaction costs) can cover the ongoing costs associated with administration, management and monitoring in perpetuity. This section summarizes the estimated cost of establishing this endowment under the different scenarios. A key assumption is that the endowment must be fully established by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 38 2io-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 the end of the land acquisition period as it is assumed that no more mitigation fees will be collected at that time.26 For the purposes of this analysis, we have assumed that habitat management and habitat monitoring costs continue in full, while administration costs are reduced by half following the end of the land acquisition period. All of these costs then continue in perpetuity. As a result and as shown in Table 18, the endowment is sized to cover the expected annual management and monitoring costs and 50 percent of the administration costs, totaling $6.8 million (2019 dollars) once all lands have been acquired. Table 18 Annual Implementation Cost Estimate (2019$) Annual Cost by Last Year of Annual Post -Land Cost Categories Land Acquisition Adjustment Acquisition Cost Period Ongoing Habitat Management Ongoing Habitat Monitoring Administration' Total $3,172,063 100% $3,172,063 $1,506,776 100% $1,506,776 $4,154,811 50% $2,077,406 $8,833,650 $6,756,244 1. Adminsitration includes salaries and benefits, accounting, auditing and reporting, contracts, etc.. Assumes less administration is needed following the land acquisition period; ongoing adminsitrative needs include oversight, auditing and reporting, and board staffing. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Consistent with many regional habitat conservations plans, the average annual net, real (allowing for inflation and institutional fees) interest rate is assumed to be three (3) percent.27 Under all extension scenarios, the total required endowment funding is $225.2 million. Because the longer extension periods provide more time for the accrual of interest revenues, the net endowment cost (that must be funded by mitigation fees) is different for each scenario. Table 19 shows the consistent total endowment funding required by scenario as well as the different levels of aggregate endowment interest and associated net endowment funding requirement. For a detailed time -series accounting of endowment funding by extension scenario, see Appendix II. 26 It is important to note that the RCA has collected a distinct set of endowment funds for situations where specific conservation activities are required over -and -above the core activities covered by this endowment calculation. 27 This assumes that the implementing entity can use investment vehicles that may be not be typical for Riverside County. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 39 ��.Wl VPPD.a .11 �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 19 Endowment Funding (2019$), by Extension Scenario Total Endowment Funding Required $225,208,133 $225,208,133 $225,208,133 $225,208,133 (Less) Endowment Interest ($25,695,187) ($40,679,628) ($54,846,349) ($68,206,990) Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 $184,528,506 $170,361,785 $157,001,144 Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Total Implementation Costs Implementation costs include land costs, administrative and professional services expenses, management and monitoring costs, and the required net endowment funding. The remaining MSHCP implementation costs, as described in detail in the preceding sections, are all estimated in 2019 constant dollar terms. Under the Baseline/ No Extension scenario, as shown in Figure 9, the $702 million in estimated land acquisition costs make up 72 percent of the total implementation cost of $974 million. Administrative costs total about 4 percent of total costs, management and monitoring sum to 3 percent of total implementation costs, and the endowment constitutes 21 percent of total costs. Figure 9 Comparison of Costs by Category Endowment Prof Svcs+Misc 1 21% 2% \ RCA Staff 2 % - M&M J / 3% Land Acqusition 72% Total implementation costs vary by extension scenario. Land acquisition costs are the same for all scenarios. Administrative, management and monitoring costs increase the longer the acquisition period is extended, but the endowment funding required decreases the longer the Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 40 c:iu.Wlam IVPPDz'a .n��wmeaw,vrveKxne�c �'O. Wwavaavenoow��le-e zao O.a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 acquisition period is extended. As shown in Table 20, total implementation costs range from $890 million to $967 million depending on the extension period. Although total costs over time increase with longer extension periods the per -year implementation costs decrease with longer extension periods, as shown in Table 21. For a detailed time -series of all implementation costs excepting the endowment, see Appendix I. Table 20 Total Implementation Costs (2019$*), by Extension Scenario Land' $701,931,902 Management & Monitoring $33,582,193 RCA Staff 2 $20,596,453 Professional Services and Supplies 2 $13,194,561 Loan Repayment 3 $2,000,000 Other Costs 24 $3,602,285 Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 Total Costs $974,420,341 $701,931,902 $701,931,902 $701,931,902 $51,646,790 $69,711,387 $87,775,983 $32,038,927 $43,481,401 $54,923,875 $20,524,873 $27,855,185 $35,185,497 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $5,603,554 $7,604,824 $9,606,093 $184,528,506 $170,361,785 $157,001,144 $998,274,552 $1,022,946,483 $1,048,424,494 1. Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. 3. RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $5 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million starting in FY 2018. 4. Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. NOTE: In some cases numbers may not perfectly sum due to rounding. Sources: Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. * All costs are provided in constant 2019 dollar terms. Costs will change over time due to inflation and other factors. These changes will be addressed through the fee indexing/ updating process that will include automatic inflation -indexed fee changes annually based on the regional Consumer Price Index and periodic comprehensive updates to the Nexus Study. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 41a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 21 Average Annual Implementation Costs (2019$), by Extension Scenario Land' $77,992,434 $50,137,993 $36,943,784 $29,247,163 Management & Monitoring $3,731,355 $3,689,056 $3,669,020 $3,657,333 RCA Staff 2 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services and Supplies 2 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment 3 $222,222 $142,857 $105,263 $83,333 Other Costs 24 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Net Endowment Funding Required $22,168,105 $13,180,608 $8,966,410 $6,541,714 Total Costs $108,268,927 $71,305,325 $53,839,289 $43,684,354 1. Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. 3. RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $5 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million starting in FY 2018. 4. Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. NOTE: In some cases numbers may not perfectly sum due to rounding. Sources: Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 42a aw000aa��M,�o=onw; �„�eKxne� a .o a�.��Moo��=� aYF;a 3�zoo.d 6. RCA NON -FEE REVENUES MSHCP Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues The MSHCP forecast an array of revenue sources, in addition to fee revenue, supporting the conservation program. These sources were anticipated to total about 44 percent of the revenue for the program, including: • Transportation funding - includes the Measure A sales tax which is authorized through 2039 and other transportation funding sources such as the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) charged on new development. Note that the MSHCP envisioned up to $121 million of Measure A money to the HCP. • Other infrastructure projects - funding from this source was not quantified in the MSHCP but reflected the expectation that local public construction projects such as schools, administrative facilities, libraries, jails, and other projects like flood control and utility projects would mitigate the construction through the payment of a per -acre fee.28 Since MSHCP adoption, the standard contribution has been three to five percent of total project costs. • Landfill contributions - Landfill tipping fees have been used in the County since the 1990 for conservation programs. Under county permitting of landfills, the County has committed to divert portions of tipping fees to MSHCP implementation. Table 22 and Figure 10 summarizes the revenue forecasts under the MSHCP. Including the fee revenues, these sources totaled $1.07 billion or an estimated average almost $43 million per year for 25-years (in 2004 dollars). Excluding fee revenues, a total of $18.84 million in annual revenues were forecast, including Measure A funding, $10 million each year from other transportation projects, and $4.0 million from land fill contributions. As described further below, at this point, the average annual funding from non -fee revenues sources are well below the MSCHP forecast. Measure A, a voter -approved 1/2 cent sales tax measure did provide substantial funding as envisioned (though is now fully used/ allocated) and, collectively, the other non -fee funding sources are well beyond what was originally envisioned. 28 See Chapter 8.5.1 Funding Sources in the MSHCP. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 43 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 22 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources Fee Funded Sources: Cities and County Development Mitigation Fees Density Bonus Fees Non -Fee Funded Sources Public Funding Sources $539.6 50% $21,584,000 66.0 6% $2,640,000 $605.6 $24,224,000.0 Local Roads (Measure A) $121.0 11% $4,840,000 Other Transportation $250.0 23% $10,000,000 Other infrastructure Projects unknown 0% $0 El Sobrante Landfill $90.0 8% $3,600,000 County Landfills $10.0 1 % $400,000 Eagle Mountain Landfill unknown 0% $0 New Regional funding unknown 0% $0 Non -Fee Funded Sources $471.0 $18,840,000 Total, Local Funds $1,076.6 100% $43,064,000 Figure 10 2004 MSHCP Anticipated Funding Sources Feefunded 56% Non -Fee Funded 44 % her artation 23% Local Roads 11% El Sobrante/Other County Landfills 10% New Forecast of Non -Fee Revenues Non -fee revenues to the RCA are projected to be $6.85 million annually in 2019 dollars. This estimate was derived from a line by line review of the major revenue items for a 3-year period from FY 2016-17 to FY 2018-19, projections by collection entities (e.g., TUMF revenue), and recent dynamics likely to affect the revenue source (e.g., greater diversion of trash to recycling Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 44 ��.W. VPPDa a .11 �.„�Kx e����'.O�W �WMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 will likely reduce tipping fees). The estimates have been inflated from a three-year average to 2019 dollars, as detailed in Table 23. Table 23 Annual Non -Fee Revenue Projection (2019$s) Non -Fee Revenue Item Transportation Mitigation' TUMF Revenue -Developer Fees $950,000 $979,637 Subtotal $950,000 $979,637 Tipping Fee $3,865,728 $3,986,326 Public Proiect Mitiaation PSE Mitigation Feet NA $500,000 Other Gov MSHCP Infrastructure $284,570 $293,448 Other Gov MSHCP Civic Projects $93,629 $96,550 Flood Control District $293,084 $302,227 Subtotal $671,283 $1,192,225 Other Revenue Interest and Other Sources $467,073 $481,644 Rents $80,531 $83,043 Joint Project Review Fees $124,762 $128,654 Subtotal $672,365 $693,341 Total Revenue NA $6,851,529 1. All Measure A funding was provided prior to 2020 and the associated obligations have been met. 2. Participating Special Entities fees. This does not include Developer Mitigation Fees. These fees vary widely year over year, $500,000 is used as an annual average per the recommendation of RCA staff. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 45. w000aa��M,�o=onw; �„�eKxne� a .o a�.��Moo��=� aYF;a 3�zoo.d 7, MITIGATION FEE CALCULATION The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee is based on a generally similar methodology to the Original Nexus Study that ensures the fee level is proportional to the development impact. This methodology looks at the remaining conservation requirements associated with Local Permittee obligations under the MSHCP and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement, determines the remaining Local Permittee implementation cost, subtracts out reasonable estimates of non -fee revenues and other contributions, to determine the overall fee - funding obligation. This obligation is then divided among the new development forecast to determine the required mitigation fee. In others words, the original 2003 and updated 2020 Local Development Mitigation Fee estimates are the outcome of the following formula (the 2003 and 2020 Nexus Studies differ in their process of allocating funding required between land uses): I. Implementation Costs minus 2. Non -Fee Funding equals 3. Outstanding Funding Required divided by 4. Development Forecast equals 5. Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule Table 24 summarizes the estimated Net Implementation Costs, Expected Acres of Development, and the associated per gross acre mitigation fee. As shown, the average mitigation fee per gross acre decreases with each extension as similar levels of net implementation costs are spread across more development. Tables 25 through 28 provide the detailed calculations that determine the total net MSHCP implementation costs shown in Table 24. As noted in Chapter 1, for residential development, the per -gross -acre fee is translated into a per -unit fee schedule for administrative continuity. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 46 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 24 MSHCP Implementation Costs and Per Acre Mitigation Fees Net Cost $912,756,583 $902,353,150 $892,767,438 $883,987,805 Acres of Development Residential 14,026 21,818 29,611 37,403 Nonresidential 6,239 9,705 13,171 16,637 Total 20,265 31,523 42,782 54,040 Mitigation Fee per Acre $45,041 $28,625 $20,868 $16,358 Sources: Southern California Association of Governments; Western Riverside County RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 47a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 25 Recommended Fee Level —No Extension Local Permittee Land Requirements Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 6,310 acres na (less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 1 111 acres na Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 5,199 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs Land (1) $701,931,902 $77,992,434 72.0% Management & Monitoring $33,582,193 $3,731,355 3.4% RCA Staff (2) $20,596,453 $2,288,495 2.1 % Professional Services and Supplies (2) $13,194,561 $1,466,062 1.4% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $222,222 0.2% Other Costs (2) (4) $3,602,285 $400,254 0.4% Net Endowment Funding Required $199,512,947 $22,168,105 20.5% Total Costs $974,420,341 $1085268,927 100.0% Offsetting Revenues (5) (exc. Private Development Mitigation) Public Project Mitigation (6) $10,730,025 $1,192,225 1.4% Transportation Mitigation (7) $8,816,731 $979,637 1.1% Tipping Fees $35,876,934 $3,986,326 4.6% Other Revenues (8) $6,240,068 $693,341 0.8% Total Selected Revenues $61,663,758 $6,851,529 8.0% Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation Net Cost $912,756,583 $101,417,398 93.7% Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection: Development 2020 - 2028 Annual Residential Units 79,000 8,778 Residential Acres 14,026 1,558 Non -Residential Acres 6,239 693 Total Acres 20,265 2,252 Mitigation Fee $45,041 per acre (1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (3) RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (7) Includes TUMF fees. (8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees. Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 48 ��.Wla�IVPPD.I�.l� �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 26 Recommended Fee Level-5-Year Extension Local Permittee Land Requirements Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 4,056 acres na (less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 714 acres na Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 3,342 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs Land (1) $701,931,902 $50,137,993 70.3% Management & Monitoring $51,646,790 $3,689,056 5.2% RCA Staff (2) $32,038,927 $2,288,495 3.2% Professional Services and Supplies (2) $20,524,873 $1,466,062 2.1% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $142,857 0.2% Other Costs (2) (4) $5,603,554 $400,254 0.6% Net Endowment Funding Required $184,528,506 $13,180,608 18.5% Total Costs $998,274,552 $71,305,325 100.0% Offsetting Revenues (5) (exc. Private Development Mitigation) Public Project Mitigation (6) $16,691,150 $1,192,225 2.1% Transportation Mitigation (7) $13,714,915 $979,637 1.7% Tipping Fees $55,808,564 $3,986,326 6.9% Other Revenues (8) $9,706,772 $693,341 1.2% Total Selected Revenues $95,921,402 $6,851,529 11.8% Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation Net Cost $902,353,150 $64,453,796 90.4% Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Protection: Development 2020 - 2033 Annual Residential Units (4.2 DU/Acres) 122,456 8,747 Residential Acres 21,818 1,558 Non -Residential Acres 9,705 693 Total Acres 31,523 2,252 Mitigation Fee $28,625 per acre (1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (3) RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (7) Includes TUMF fees. (8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees. Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 49 ��.Wla�IVPPD.I�.l� �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 27 Recommended Fee Level-10-Year Extension Local Permittee Land Requirements Preservation Requirement 56,788 acres 2,989 acres na (less) HANS Dedication 10,000 acres 526 acres na Local Permittee Acquisition 46,788 acres 2,463 acres na Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs Land (1) $701,931,902 $36,943,784 68.6% Management & Monitoring $69,711,387 $3,669,020 6.8% RCA Staff (2) $43,481,401 $2,288,495 4.3% Professional Services and Supplies (2) $27,855,185 $1,466,062 2.7% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $105,263 0.2% Other Costs (2) (4) $7,604,824 $400,254 0.7% Net Endowment Funding Required $170,361,785 $8,966,410 16.7% Total Costs $1,022,946,483 $53,839,289 100.0% Offsetting Revenues (5) (exc. Private Development Mitigation) Public Project Mitigation (6) $22,652,275 $1,192,225 2.7% Transportation Mitigation (7) $18,613,099 $979,637 2.2% Tipping Fees $75,740,195 $3,986,326 8.9% Other Revenues (8) $13,173,476 $693,341 1.5% Total Selected Revenues $130,1795045 $658515529 15.3% Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation Net Cost $892,767,438 $46,987,760 87.3% Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection: Development 2020 - 2038 Annual Residential Units (4.2 DU/Acres) 166,000 8,737 Residential Acres 29,611 1,558 Non -Residential Acres 13,171 693 Total Acres 42,782 2,252 Mitigation Fee $20,868 per acre (1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (3) RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (7) Includes TUMF fees. (8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees. Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 50a Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 Table 28 Recommended Fee Level-15-Year Extension Local Permittee Land Requirements Preservation Requirement (less) HANS Dedication Local Permittee Acquisition Local Permittee MSHCP Implementation Costs 56,788 acres 2,366 acres na 10,000 acres 417 acres na 46,788 acres 1,950 acres na Land (1) $701,931,902 $29,247,163 67.0% Management & Monitoring $87,775,983 $3,657,333 8.4% RCA Staff (2) $54,923,875 $2,288,495 5.2% Professional Services and Supplies (2) $35,185,497 $1,466,062 3.4% Loan Repayment (3) $2,000,000 $83,333 0.2% Other Costs (2) (4) $9,606,093 $400,254 0.9% Net Endowment Funding Required $157,001,144 $6,541,714 15.0% Total Costs $1,048,424,494 $43,684,354 100.0% Offsetting Revenues (5) (exc. Private Development Mitigation) Public Project Mitigation (6) $28,613,400 $1,192,225 3.2% Transportation Mitigation (7) $23,511,283 $979,637 2.6% Tipping Fees $95,671,825 $3,986,326 10.7% Other Revenues (8) $16,640,181 $693,341 1.9% Total Selected Revenues $164,436,689 $6,851,529 18.4% Funding Required from Private Development Mitigation Net Cost $883,987,805 $36,832,825 84.3% Mitigation Fee Estimates (per gross acre of development) Growth Projection: Development 2020 - 2043 Annual Residential Units 210,000 8,750 Residential Acres 37,403 1,558 Non -Residential Acres 16,637 693 Total Acres 54,040 2,252 Mitigation Fee $16,358 per acre (1) Land value estimates at $14,288 per acre in 2019 dollar terms plus a 5% transaction cost. (2) RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (3) RCA has "Other Long Term Obligations" totaling $2 million, which was a loan received from the County in FY 2012/13 and is now payable in increments of $1 million over the course of two years. (4) Includes rents and all other miscellaneous expenses. (5) RCA Revenues are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. (6) Includes Flood Control District, PSE mitigation payments, and other government MSHCP infrastructure & civic project revenues. (7) Includes TUMF fees. (8) Includes interest and other sources, rents, and joint project review fees. Sources: MSHCP; RCA; Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 51 ��.Wla�IVPPD.I�.l� �.„�Kxne ��'.o�WWMMoo���ldy �L �� O.d $, MITIGATION FEE ACT (NEXUS) FINDINGS Mitigation fees are utilized in California to finance public facilities necessary to mitigate impacts stemming from new development. In 1987, the California Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act to provide a framework for the application and administration of such fees. Current prevailing practice among the majority of approved and permitted regional multiple -species Habitat Conservation Plans is that any habitat mitigation fees are to be adopted by the relevant jurisdictions (cities and Counties) consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act.29 As discussed further in Chapter 9, the adoption of fees under the Mitigation Fee Act includes a number of auditing and reporting requirements. The Mitigation Fee Act, defined in California Government Code Sections 66000 to 66025, requires all public agencies to document five findings when establishing or increasing a fee as a condition for new development. These findings were made when the Western Riverside County MSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fees were first justified and established.30 This Chapter of the Western Riverside Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study was prepared to describe how the proposed increase in the Local Development Mitigation Fee satisfies the five statutory findings required by the Mitigation Fee Act and is based on the appropriate nexus between new development and the imposition of a mitigation fee. The five statutory findings required for the establishment of a mitigation fee are summarized in the sections below and supported by the technical analysis in the prior chapters of this Study. Purpose of Fee Identify the purpose of the fee. (66001(a)(1)) The purpose of the Local Development Mitigation Fee is to contribute to the funding required to implement the MSCHP and, as a result, help maintain the incidental take permits for new private and public development in Western Riverside County under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Maintaining the incidental take permit is necessary to allow for future development, and without the development community paying for the cost of the MSHCP, individual applicants will need to apply independently for development approval under federal and State law if the project impacts a threaten or endangered species. The federal Endangered Species Act specifically requires that the applicant for incidental take permit "ensure that adequate funding for the plan will be provided."31 In addition, the Local Development Mitigation Fee helps provide the regional benefit of streamlined economic development in Western Riverside County as well as 29 In addition to the current Western Riverside County habitat mitigation fee, see also the Coachella Valley habitat mitigation fee, the San Joaquin County Multi -Species Habitat Conservation and Open Space Fee, and the East Contra Costa County HCP/NCCP mitigation fee. 30 See the Final Mitigation Nexus Report for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, published July 1, 2003. 31 See Section 1539(a)(2)Biii of the federal Endangered Species Act. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 52 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 the provision of contiguous open spaces that will serve as a community amenity to residents, workers, and visitors. Use of Fee Revenues Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specific in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged. (66001(a)(2)). The MSHCP is the public document that outlines the actions required as a whole and the particular set of actions required by the Local Permittees (and the Regional Conservation Agency as their agent) to obtain incidental take permits —associated with State and federal Endangered Species Act requirements —for new public and private development in Western Riverside County. Failure to meet the requirements of the MSHCP will result in an inability to obtain or maintain incidental take permits through the MSHCP, which would require future development to secure individual take authorization if the project impacts a threaten or endangered species. Revenues from the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be used, in conjunction with other local and regional funding sources, to fund the conservation actions identified as the responsibility of Local Permittees in the MSHCP. The revenue from the Local Development Mitigation Fee will be used to help fund the appropriate habitat acquisition (land acquisition and associated transaction costs), maintenance and monitoring of habitat land (preserve management, monitoring, and adaptive management), and program management, administration, and oversight activities and costs.32 Chapter 3 of this report describes the Local Permittee conservation requirements, progress to date, and the remaining actions required under the MSHCP. Relationship Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (66001(a)(3)). The implementation of the MSHCP, and the mitigation fee as a fundamental part of it, will benefit all new development by mitigating their collective impacts on covered species and associated habitat. All new public and private development in the Plan area will affect habitat and species either directly, indirectly, or as a cumulative effect. New infrastructure development, for example, in addition to its direct effects, will support new development on other parcels and other locations in the Plan Area. Similarly, new private development will require new infrastructure and also result in additional demand for new developments through linkages —for 32 Consistent with the interpretation applied to the majority of permitted and approved regional, multiple -species Habitat Conservation Plans in California and guidance from RCA Counsel, the Local Development Mitigation Fee is assumed to fund its proportionate share (as determined by the technical analysis and constrained by the statutory requirements) of applicable MSHCP implementation costs including, but also limited to, habitat acquisition costs (and associated transaction costs), the costs of managing and monitoring the habitat preserves in perpetuity, and the administrative and other costs of managing the overall program. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 53 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 example, the need for new housing to accommodate new workers at commercial developments or the need for new retail developments to serve new residents at residential developments. In other words, all new development in Western Riverside County will benefit from the incidental take permits obtained through the MSHCP and via the use of the mitigation fee revenues. In addition, the incidental take permits are necessary to permit any future development within the Plan Area, and in order to obtain or maintain such incidental take permits, the MSHCP must be fully funded. Because funding the MSHCP is required in order to allow for future development under the MSHCP, there is a direct relationship between the proposed use of the mitigation fee and development within the Plan Area. Need Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed. (66001(a)(4)). Without new development, no MSHCP would be necessary and no further habitat conservation would be required under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. To allow for any future development under the Plan, the MSHCP must be fully funded. New development in the Plan Area, as noted above, will directly, indirectly, or cumulatively affect species and habitat in Western Riverside County. Because of this, development of the MSHCP was undertaken to provide a regional, streamlined approach to benefit future development of all types in Western Riverside County, including the development and improvements envisioned under the numerous General Plans and the Regional Transportation Improvement Program. The requirements of the MSHCP (habitat acquisition, management and monitoring, program administration) are a direct result of the regional approach to mitigation that is engendered by all new development in the Plan Area under the pertinent environmental regulations. Meeting the requirements of the MSHCP is necessary to obtain the necessary federal authorization to develop within the Plan Area. Proportionality Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. (66001(b)). The MSHCP includes detailed conservation requirements based on the scientific evaluations that form the basis of the MSHCP. Based on these evaluations, conservation responsibilities were allocated between the Local Permittees and other agencies, such as the State and federal governments. The Local Development Mitigation Fee appropriately provides funding towards the fulfillment of the Local Permittee conservation requirements. Furthermore, the Local Permittee obligations are not fully funded through the Local Development Mitigation Fee revenues. Other local and regional funding sources, such as the Measure A sales tax and tipping fees, provide additional mitigation and/or offsetting revenues that reduce the overall cost allocation to the Local Development Mitigation Fee Program. In addition, consistent with the relationship between new development in Western Riverside County and the need for the public facilities (conservation program) described above, proportional attribution between new development is ensured Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 54 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 through the determination of a consistent per gross acre Local Development Mitigation Fee.33 As a result, the Local Development Mitigation Fee level calculations are carefully determined to fund only the proportionate (or less than) conservation costs attributable to the new development on which the fee is imposed and to allocate the fee levels proportionally across all new development. It is this process of careful calculation based on the requirements of the MSHCP that is the subject of a substantial portion of this Nexus Study (see Chapters 2 through 7). 33 Determining habitat mitigation fees on a gross acre basis is the clearest way of ensuring proportionate cost allocations among new developments and is a common practice among adopted Habitat Conservation Plans. For purposes of implementation/administrative consistency, for residential uses, the per -gross -acre fee is translated into per unit fees for different density categories. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 55 230-0- 9, FEE IMPLEMENTATION The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee must be implemented consistent with the MSHCP (and associated Incidental Take Permit and Implementing Agreement) as well as the California Mitigation Fee Act. A detailed set of guidance is included in the Fee Implementation Handbook to support clarity and specificity in the implementation of the updated fee program by Local Permittees. The sections below summarize some of the key implementation and administration actions to be consistent with the requirements. Adoption of Revised LDMF • Consistent with the MSHCP and associated documents, each Local Permittee (i.e., all participating jurisdictions) must adopt an updated LDMF ordinance and a fee resolution establishing the revised fee level as prescribed by the Mitigation Fee Act. • Consistent with the Mitigation Fee Act, the revised ordinance and associated fee resolution will become effective after a public hearing and 60 days. • RCA Legal Counsel will prepare a Fee Update Ordinance and Resolution to facilitate the consistent adoption of the updated LDMF by Local Permittees. Securing Supplemental Funding The revised Local Development Mitigation Fee is set at the level that would cover the Local Permittee cost obligations once expected non -fee revenues are subtracted out. To the extent any discounts/exemptions are provided to new Western Riverside County development below the updated fee level, additional funding will be required to backfill the fee revenue losses. To the extent, these revenues do not make up for any fee discounts provided, other sources of funding will need to be sought by the RCA and the Local Permittees to fulfill their Plan obligations. At the same time, if new substantial funding sources become available to the RCA for Local Permittee obligations, the funding required through fees may decrease, in turn reducing the required fee levels through a new update. Annual Review The Mitigation Fee Act (at Gov. C. §§ 66001(c), 66006(b)(1)) stipulates that each local agency that requires payment of a fee make specific information available to the public annually within 180 days of the last day of the fiscal year. In this case, the RCA can play this role on behalf of the Local Permittees. This information includes the following: • A description of the type of fee in the account. • The amount of the fee (the mitigation fee schedule). • The beginning and ending balance of the fund. • The amount of fees collected and interest earned. • Identification of the improvements constructed. • The total cost of the improvements constructed. • The fees expended to construct the improvement. • The percentage of total costs funded by the fee. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 56 230-0- Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Fee Study Update Final Report October 2020 If sufficient fees have been collected to fund specific improvement cost, the agency must specify the approximate date for the cost of that improvement. Because of the dynamic nature of growth and MSHCP implementation costs and consistent with current practice, the RCA should continue to monitor progress towards MSHCP goals. The overall adequacy of the fee revenues and other available funding in meeting these goals should be reviewed annually. Surplus Funds The Mitigation Fee Act also requires that if any portion of a fee remains unexpended or uncommitted in an account for 5 years or more after deposit of the fee, the RCA, acting for the Local Permittees, shall make findings once each year (1) to identify the purpose to which the fee is to be put, (2) to demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it was charged, (3) to identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements, and (4) to designate the approximate dates on which the funding identified in (3) is expected to be deposited into the appropriate fund (§66001(d)). If adequate funding has been collected for specific investments, an approximate date must be specified as to when the cost of the investment will be incurred. If the findings show no need for the unspent funds, or if the conditions discussed above are not met, and the administrative costs of the refund do not exceed the refund itself, the local agency that has collected the funds must refund them (Gov. C §66001(e)(f)). Annual and Periodic Updates Consistent with the current practice, the Fee Ordinance should allow an automatic annual adjustment to the fees based on the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, CA Consumer Price Index (CPI) or a similar inflation factor. In addition, a more comprehensive update should be conducted required periodically. The Nexus Study and the technical information it contains should be reviewed periodically by the RCA (every five years is recommended) to identify any necessary refinements to the Local Development Mitigation Fees to ensure adequate funding to implement the MSHCP. Under certain circumstances, the RCA may wish to conduct a Nexus Study update sooner than after five years. For example, to the extent there are significant and unexpected changes in implementation costs, in the level of non -fee funding, and/ or the level of fee -paying private development over time, a more immediate fee update may be appropriate. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 57 230-0- Detailed Time Series of Implementation Costs All Implementation Costs Over Time - No Extension ACRES Land Acuisition Costs Land Acquisition (Annual) Local (less) HANS/JPR Dedications Total Local State/Fed Total Land Acquisition (Cumulative) Local' State/Fed Local - HANS/JPR Dedications Total Management and Monitoring Costs Reserve Summary State/ Federal POP ARL Total Local PQP ARL Total Total Acres under RCA Management Total Acres under RCA Monitoring COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars) Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, Annual Land Transaction Costs Total, Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, Cumulative Management and Monitoring Costs Management, Annual Management Cumulative Monitoring, Annual Monitoring Cumulative Endowment Costs Net Endowment Funding, Annual Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative Administrative Costs 2 RCA Staff Costs Professional Services Loan Repayment 3 Other Total Annual Cumulative Costs TOTAL ALL COSTS TOTAL Annual TOTAL Cumulative 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 6,310 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 5,060 6,310 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 3,821 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 8,881 10,131 45,272 50,332 55,391 60,451 65,511 70,571 75,630 80,690 87,000 25,429 29,251 33,072 36,893 40,715 44,536 48,357 52,179 56,000 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 71,951 82,082 92,213 102,344 112,476 122,607 132,738 142,869 153,000 Financial Responsibility Monitoring Management RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 RCA State 25,429 29,251 33,072 36,893 40,715 44,536 48,357 52,179 56,000 307,429 311,251 315,072 318,893 322,715 326,536 330,357 334,179 338,000 RCA Non -RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 RCA RCA 46,522 52,832 59,141 65,451 71,761 78,071 84,380 90,690 97,000 111,522 117,832 124,141 130,451 136,761 143,071 149,380 155,690 162,000 46,522 52,832 59,141 65,451 71,761 78,071 84,380 90,690 97,000 418,951 429,082 439,213 449,344 459,476 469,607 479,738 489,869 500,000 $14,288 $/Acre $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $72,294,065 $90,154,055 5% of acquisition costs $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $3,614,703 $4,507,703 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $75,908,768 $94,661,758 $75,908,768 $151,817,536 $227,726,304 $303,635,072 $379,543,840 $455,452,608 $531,361,376 $607,270,144 $701,931,902 $32.70 $/Acre $1,521,340 $1,727,681 $1,934,021 $2,140,361 $2,346,702 $2,553,042 $2,759,382 $2,965,723 $3,172,063 $1,521,340 $3,249,021 $5,183,042 $7,323,403 $9,670,105 $12,223,147 $14,982,530 $17,948,252 $21,120,315 $3.01 $/Acre $1,262,531 $1,293,061 $1,323,592 $1,354,122 $1,384,653 $1,415,184 $1,445,714 $1,476,245 $1,506,776 $1,262,531 $2,555,592 $3,879,184 $5,233,306 $6,617,959 $8,033,143 $9,478,857 $10,955,102 $12,461,878 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $44,336,210 $66,504,316 $88,672,421 $110,840,526 $133,008,631 $155,176,736 $177,344,842 $199,512,947 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $106,015,555 $106,252,426 $105,489,297 $105,726,168 $105,963,039 $106,199,910 $106,436,781 $106,673,652 $125,663,513 $106,015,555 $212,267,981 $317,757,279 $423,483,447 $529,446,486 $635,646,396 $742,083,177 $848,756,829 $974,420,341 1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. 3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed. All Implementation Costs Over Time - 5 Year Extension ACRES _ Land Acuisition Costs Land Acquisition (Annual) Local 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Local 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 2,806 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 4,056 State/Fed 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 2,457 Total 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 5,263 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 6,513 Land Acquisition (Cumulative) Local' 43,018 45,825 48,631 51,437 54,243 57,050 59,856 62,662 66,719 70,775 74,831 78,887 82,944 87,000 State/Fed 24,065 26,521 28,978 31,434 33,891 36,347 38,804 41,261 43,717 46,174 48,630 51,087 53,543 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 6,250 7,500 8,750 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10.000 Total 68,333 74,846 81,359 87,871 94,384 100,897 107,410 113,923 120,436 126,949 133,461 139,974 146,487 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs Reserve Summary Financial Responsibility Monitoring Management State/ Federal PQP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 24,065 26,521 28,978 31,434 33,891 36,347 38,804 41,261 43,717 46,174 48,630 51,087 53,543 56,000 Total 306,065 308,521 310,978 313,434 315,891 318,347 320,804 323,261 325,717 328,174 330,630 333,087 335,543 338,000 Local PQP RCA Non -RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 44,268 48,325 52,381 56,437 60,493 64,550 68,606 72,662 76,719 80,775 84,831 88,887 92,944 97,000 Total 109,268 113,325 117,381 121,437 125,493 129,550 133,606 137,662 141,719 145,775 149,831 153,887 157,944 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 44,268 48,325 52,381 56,437 60,493 64,550 68,606 72,662 76,719 80,775 84,831 88,887 92,944 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 415,333 421,846 428,359 434,871 441,384 447,897 454,410 460,923 467,436 473,949 480,461 486,974 493,487 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars) _ Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, Annual $14,288 $/Acre $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $40,096,188 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 $57,956,178 Land Transaction Costs 5% of acquisition costs $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,004,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 $2,897,809 Total, Land Acquisition Costs $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $42,100,997 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 $60,853,987 Local, ARL, Cumulative $42,100,997 $84,201,995 $126,302,992 $168,403,990 $210,504,987 $252,605,985 $294,706,982 $336,807,979 $397,661,967 $458,515,954 $519,369,941 $580,223,928 $641,077,915 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs Management, Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1,447,647 $1,580,295 $1,712,942 $1,845,589 $1,978,237 $2,110,884 $2,243,532 $2,376,179 $2,508,826 $2,641,474 $2,774,121 $2,906,768 $3,039,416 $3,172,063 Management Cumulative $1,447,647 $3,027,942 $4,740,884 $6,586,474 $8,564,710 $10,675,595 $12,919,126 $15,295,305 $17,804,131 $20,445,605 $23,219,726 $26,126,494 $29,165,910 $32,337,973 Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1,251,627 $1,271,254 $1,290,880 $1,310,507 $1,330,134 $1,349,761 $1,369,388 $1,389,015 $1,408,641 $1,428,268 $1,447,895 $1,467,522 $1,487,149 $1,506,776 Monitoring Cumulative $1,251,627 $2,522,880 $3,813,761 $5,124,268 $6,454,402 $7,804,163 $9,173,551 $10,562,566 $11,971,207 $13,399,476 $14,847,371 $16,314,893 $17,802,041 $19,308,817 Endowment Costs Net Endowment Funding, Annual $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative $13,180,608 $26,361,215 $39,541,823 $52,722,430 $65,903,038 $79,083,645 $92,264,253 $105,444,860 $118,625,468 $131,806,076 $144,986,683 $158,167,291 $171,347,898 $184,528,506 Administrative Costs 2 RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual Costs $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355 TOTAL ALL COSTS TOTAL Annual $63,135,690 $63,287,964 $62,440,239 $62,592,513 $62,744,787 $62,897,061 $63,049,335 $63,201,610 $82,106,873 $82,259,148 $82,411,422 $82,563,696 $82,715,970 $82,868,244 TOTAL Cumulative $63,135,690 $126,423,655 $188,863,893 $251,456,406 $314,201,193 $377,098,254 $440,147,590 $503,349,199 $585,456,073 $667,715,220 $750,126,642 $832,690,338 $915,406,308 $998,274,552 1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars 3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed. All Implementation Costs Over Time - 10 Year Extension ACRES Land Acuisition Costs Land Acquisition (Annual) Local 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 (less) Anheuser Busch purchase 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (less) HANS/JPR Dedications -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 -1,250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Local 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 1,739 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 2,989 State/Fed 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 1 810 Total 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 3,549 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 4,799 Land Acquisition (Cumulative) Local' 41,951 43,690 45,429 47,167 48,906 50,645 52,384 54,123 57,112 60,100 63,089 66,078 69,067 72,056 75,045 78,033 81,022 84,011 87,000 State/Fed 23,418 25,228 27,038 28,848 30,659 32,469 34,279 36,089 37,899 39,709 41,519 43,329 45,139 46,949 48,760 50,570 52,380 54,190 56,000 Local - HANS/JPR Dedications 1 250 2 500 3 750 5 000 6 250 7 500 8 750 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 66,619 71,418 76,217 81,016 85,815 90,614 95,413 100,212 105,011 109,809 114,608 119,407 124,206 129,005 133,804 138,603 143,402 148,201 153,000 Management and Monitoring Costs Reserve Summary Financial Responsibility Monitoring Management State/ Federal POP RCA State/ Fed 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 ARL RCA State 23,418 25,228 27,038 28,848 30,659 32,469 34,279 36,089 37,899 39,709 41,519 43,329 45,139 46,949 48,760 50,570 52,380 54,190 56,000 Total 305,418 307,228 309,038 310,848 312,659 314,469 316,279 318,089 319,899 321,709 323,519 325,329 327,139 328,949 330,760 332,570 334,380 336,190 338,000 Local PQP RCA Non -RCA Local 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 ARL RCA RCA 43,201 46,190 49,179 52,167 55,156 58,145 61,134 64,123 67,112 70,100 73,089 76,078 79,067 82,056 85,045 88,033 91,022 94,011 97,000 Total 108,201 111,190 114,179 117,167 120,156 123,145 126,134 129,123 132,112 135,100 138,089 141,078 144,067 147,056 150,045 153,033 156,022 159,011 162,000 Total Acres under RCA Management 43,201 46,190 49,179 52,167 55,156 58,145 61,134 64,123 67,112 70,100 73,089 76,078 79,067 82,056 85,045 88,033 91,022 94,011 97,000 Total Acres under RCA Monitoring 413,619 418,418 423,217 428,016 432,815 437,614 442,413 447,212 452,011 456,809 461,608 466,407 471,206 476,005 480,804 485,603 490,402 495,201 500,000 COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars) 1h Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, Annual $14,288 $/Acre $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $24,844,562 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 $42,704,552 Land Transaction Costs 5% of acquisition $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $1,242,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 $2,135,228 costs Total, Land Acquisition Costs $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $26,086,790 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 $44,839,780 Local, ARL, Cumulative $26,086,790 $52,173,581 $78,260,371 $104,347,161 $130,433,952 $156,520,742 $182,607,532 $208,694,323 $253,534,102 $298,373,882 $343,213,662 $388,053,442 $432,893,222 $477,733,002 $522,572,782 $567,412,562 $612,252,342 $657,092,122 $701,931,902 Management and Monitoring Costs Management, Annual $32.70 $/Acre $1,412,740 $1,510,480 $1,608,220 $1,705,961 $1,803,701 $1,901,441 $1,999,181 $2,096,921 $2,194,661 $2,292,402 $2,390,142 $2,487,882 $2,585,622 $2,683,362 $2,781,102 $2,878,843 $2,976,583 $3,074,323 $3,172,063 Management Cumulative $1,412,740 $2,923,220 $4,531,441 $6,237,402 $8,041,102 $9,942,543 $11,941,725 $14,038,646 $16,233,307 $18,525,709 $20,915,851 $23,403,733 $25,989,355 $28,672,717 $31,453,819 $34,332,662 $37,309,245 $40,383,568 $43,555,631 Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre $1,246,462 $1,260,924 $1,275,386 $1,289,847 $1,304,309 $1,318,771 $1,333,233 $1,347,695 $1,362,157 $1,376,619 $1,391,081 $1,405,542 $1,420,004 $1,434,466 $1,448,928 $1,463,390 $1,477,852 $1,492,314 $1,506,776 Monitoring Cumulative $1,246,462 $2,507,386 $3,782,771 $5,072,619 $6,376,928 $7,695,699 $9,028,932 $10,376,627 $11,738,784 $13,115,403 $14,506,484 $15,912,026 $17,332,030 $18,766,497 $20,215,425 $21,678,815 $23,156,667 $24,648,980 $26,155,756 Endowment Costs Net Endowment Funding, Annual $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative $8,966,410 $17,932,819 $26,899,229 $35,865,639 $44,832,049 $53,798,458 $62,764,868 $71,731,278 $80,697,687 $89,664,097 $98,630,507 $107,596,917 $116,563,326 $125,529,736 $134,496,146 $143,462,556 $152,428,965 $161,395,375 $170,361,785 Administrative Costs 2 RCA Staff Costs $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 Professional Services $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 Loan Repayment $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 Total Annual Costs $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 Cumulative Costs $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355 $64,322,166 $68,476,977 $72,631,788 $76,786,599 $80,941,410 TOTAL ALL COSTS TOTAL Annual $42,867,213 $42,979,415 $42,091,617 $42,203,819 $42,316,021 $42,428,223 $42,540,425 $42,652,627 $61,517,819 $61,630,021 $61,742,223 $61,854,425 $61,966,627 $62,078,829 $62,191,031 $62,303,233 $62,415,435 $62,527,637 $62,639,839 TOTAL Cumulative $42,867,213 $85,846,628 $127,938,245 $170,142,065 $212,458,086 $254,886,309 $297,426,735 $340,079,362 $401,597,181 $463,227,202 $524,969,425 $586,823,850 $648,790,477 $710,869,307 $773,060,338 $835,363,571 $897,779,006 $960,306,644 $1,022,946,483 1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars 3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed. All Implementation Costs Over Time - 15 Year Extension ACRES Land Acuisition Costs Land Acquisition (Annual) Local (less) HANS/JPR Dedications Total Local State/Fed Total Land Acquisition (Cumulative) Local t State/Fed Local - HANS/JPR Dedications Total Management and Monitoring Costs Reserve Summary Financial Responsibility Monitoring Management State/ Federal POP RCA State/ Fed ARL RCA State Total Local PQP RCA Non -RCA Local ARL RCA RCA Total Total Acres under RCA Management Total Acres under RCA Monitoring COSTS (all constant 2019 dollars) Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, $14 288 $/Acre Annual Land Transaction 5% of acquisition Costs costs Total, Land Acquisition Costs Local, ARL, Cumulative Management and Monitoring Costs Management, $32.70 $/Acre Annual Management Cumulative Monitoring, Annual $3.01 $/Acre Monitoring Cumulative Endowment Costs Net Endowment Funding, Annual Net Endowment Funding, Cumulative Administrative Costs' RCA Staff Costs Professional Services Loan Repayment 3 Other Total Annual Costs Cumulative Costs TOTAL ALL COSTS TOTAL Annual TOTAL Cumulative 1 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 -1�250 -1i50 12i0- -ice -1i50 -1i50 -1i50 -ice 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 1,116 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 2,366 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 1 433 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 2,549 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 3,799 41,328 42,444 43,561 44,677 45,793 46,909 48,025 49,141 51,508 53,874 56,240 58,606 60,972 63,338 65,705 68,071 70,437 72,803 75,169 77,535 79,902 82,268 84,634 87,000 23,041 24,474 25,907 27,340 28,773 30,206 31,639 33,072 34,505 35,938 37,371 38,804 40,237 41,670 43,103 44,536 45,969 47,402 48,835 50,268 51,701 53,134 54,567 56,000 1 250 2 500 3 750 5 000 6 250 7 500 8 750 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 65,619 69,418 73,218 77,017 80,816 84,615 88,414 92,213 96,013 99,812 103,611 107,410 111,209 115,008 118,808 122,607 126,406 130,205 134,004 137,803 141,603 145,402 149,201 153,000 1 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 23,041 24,474 25,907 27_340 28,773 30,206 31,639 33,072 34,505 35,938 37,371 38,804 40,237 41,670 43,103 44,536 45,969 47,402 48,835 50,268 51,701 53,134 54,567 56,000 305,041 306,474 307,907 309,340 310,773 312,206 313,639 315,072 316,505 317,938 319,371 320,804 322,237 323,670 325,103 326,536 327,969 329,402 330,835 332,268 333,701 335,134 336,567 338,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 42,578 44,944 47,311 49,677 52,043 54,409 56,775 59,141 61,508 63,874 66,240 68,606 70,972 73,338 75,705 78,071 80,437 82,803 85,169 87,535 89,902 92,268 94,634 97,000 107,578 109,944 112,311 114,677 117,043 119,409 121,775 124,141 126,508 128,874 131,240 133,606 135,972 138,338 140,705 143,071 145,437 147,803 150,169 152,535 154,902 157,268 159,634 162,000 42,578 44,944 47,311 49,677 52,043 54,409 56,775 59,141 61,508 63,874 66,240 68,606 70,972 73,338 75,705 78,071 80,437 82,803 85,169 87,535 89,902 92,268 94,634 97,000 412,619 416,418 420,218 424,017 427,816 431,615 435,414 439,213 443,013 446,812 450,611 454,410 458,209 462,008 465,808 469,607 473,406 477,205 481,004 484,803 488,603 492,402 496,201 500,000 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $15,947,780 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $33,807,771 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $797,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $1,690,389 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $16,745,170 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $35,498,169 $35,498,159 $35,498,159 $16,745,170 $33,490,339 $50,235,509 $66,980,678 $83,725,848 $100,471,017 $117,216,187 $133,961,356 $169,459,515 $204,957,674 $240,455,833 $275,953,992 $311,452,152 $346,950,311 $382,448,470 $417,946,629 $453,444,788 $488,942,947 $524,441,106 $559,939,265 $595,437,424 $630,935,583 $666,433,743 $701,931,902 - - ft -a-dillill"W" J I �r $1,392,378 $1,469,755 $1,547,133 $1,624,511 $1,701,888 $1,779,266 $1,856,643 $1,934,021 $2,011,399 $2,088,776 $2,166,154 $2,243,532 $2,320,909 $2,398,287 $2,475,664 $2,553,042 $2,630,420 $2,707,797 $2,785,175 $2,862,553 $2,939,930 $3,017,308 $3,094,685 $3,172,063 $1,392,378 $2,862,133 $4,409,266 $6,033,776 $7,735,664 $9,514,930 $11,371,574 $13,305,595 $15,316,993 $17,405,770 $19,571,923 $21,815,455 $24,136,364 $26,534,651 $29,010,315 $31,563,357 $34,193,777 $36,901,574 $39,686,749 $42,649,302 $45,489,232 $48,506,540 $51,601,225 $54,773,288 $1,243,449 $1,254,898 $1,266,347 $1,277,796 $1,289,245 $1,300,694 $1,312,143 $1,323,592 $1,335,041 $1,346,490 $1,357,939 $1,369,388 $1,380,837 $1,392,286 $1,403,735 $1,415,194 $1,426,633 $1,438,082 $1,449,531 $1,460,980 $1,472,429 $1,483,878 $1,495,327 $1,506,776 $1,243,449 $2,498,347 $3,764,694 $5,042,490 $6,331,735 $7,632,429 $8,944,572 $10,268,163 $11,603,204 $12,949,694 $14,307,633 $15,677,021 $17,057,857 $18,450,143 $19,853,878 $21,269,062 $22,695,694 $24,133,776 $25,583,307 $27,044,286 $28,516,715 $30,000,593 $31,495,919 $33,002,695 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $13,083,429 $19,625,143 $26,166,857 $32,708,572 $39,250,286 $45,792,000 $52,333,715 $58,875,429 $65,417,143 $71,958,868 $78,500,572 $85,042,286 $91,584,001 $98,125,715 $104,667,429 $111,209,144 $117,750,858 $124,292,572 $130,834,286 $137,376,001 $143,917,715 $150,459,429 $157,001,144 A i ■ $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $2,288,495 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,466,062 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $400,254 $5,154,811 $5,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $4,154,811 $5,154,811 $10,309,622 $14,464,433 $18,619,244 $22,774,055 $26,928,866 $31,083,677 $35,238,488 $39,393,299 $43,548,111 $47,702,922 $51,857,733 $56,012,544 $60,167,355 $64,322,166 $68,476,977 $72,631,788 $76,786,599 $80,941,410 $85,096,221 $89,251,032 $93,405,843 $97,560,654 $101,715,465 1 $31,077,521 $31,166,348 $30,255,175 $30,344,001 $30,432,828 $30,521,655 $30,610,481 $30,699,308 $49,541,124 $49,629,951 $49,718,777 $49,807,604 $49,896,430 $49,985,257 $50,074,084 $50,162,910 $50,251,737 $50,340,563 $50,429,390 $50,518,217 $50,607,043 $50,695,870 $50,784,697 $50,873,523 $31,077,521 $62,243,870 $92,499,044 $122,843,046 $153,275,874 $183,797,528 $214,408,009 $245,107,317 $294,648,441 $344,278,392 $393,997,169 $443,804,773 $493,701,203 $543,686,460 $593,760,544 $643,923,454 $694,175,191 $744,515,754 $794,945,144 $845,463,361 $896,070,404 $946,766,274 $997,550,971 $1,048,424,494 1. All local land conserved to date, including all HANS dedications to date, are captured in the year 17 number. 2. RCA Administrative Costs are based on a three year average of FY 2016-17 through FY 2018-19 actual costs, adjusted to 2019 dollars. 3. Annual administrative costs decrease in year 19 due to assumption that loan repayment is completed. /_ d ► B MISS Detailed Time Series of Endowment Funding Annual Cost Estimate for Management and Monitoring, Constant 2019$ Annual Cost by Last Year of Annual Post -Land Cost Categories Land Acquisition Adjustment Acquisition Cost Period Ongoing Habitat Management $3,172,063 100% $3,172,063 Ongoing Habitat Monitoring $1,506,776 100% $1,506,776 Administration' $4,154,811 50% $2,077,406 Total $8,833,650 $6,756,244 1. Adminsitration includes salaries and benefits, accounting, auditing and reporting, contracts, etc.. Assumes less administration is needed following the land acquisition period; ongoing adminsitrative needs include oversight, auditing and reporting, and board staffing. Sources: Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority; and Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Endowment Funding — No Extension Scenario New Impact Acres (avg. annual) Average Per Acre Endowment Fee Annual Endowment Funding Endowment Balance Annual Interest Cumulative Interest Earnings Total Endowment Average Annual Post Permit Interest 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $9,845 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,168,105 $22,1683105 $22,168,105 $22,1683105 $22,168,105 $44,336,210 $67,169,359 $90,687,502 $114,911,189 $139,861,586 $165,560,496 $192,030,373 $219,294,346 $0 $665,043 $1,350,038 $2,055,582 $2,782,293 $3,530,804 $4,301,772 $5,095,868 $5,913,787 $0 $665,043 $2,015,081 $4,070,663 $6,852,955 $10,383,760 $14,685,531 $19,781,399 $25,695,187 $22,168,105 $45,001,254 $68,519,396 $92,743,083 $117,693,481 $143,392,391 $169,862,268 $197,126,241 $225,208,133 $6,756,244 (1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post -permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually. 20,265 impact acres developed 9 year plan 3% interest rate (real, net) $6,756,244 annual post -permit cost estimate $9,845 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation Endowment Funding - 5 Year Extension Scenario New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 Average Per Acre $5,854 Endowment Fee Annual Endowment Funding $13,180,608 Endowment Balance $13,180,608 Annual Interest $0 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 Total Endowment $13,180,608 Average Annual Post Permit Interest 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $5,854 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $13,180,608 $26,361,215 $39,937,241 $53,920,547 $68,323,353 $83,158,243 $98,438,180 $114,176,514 $130,386,999 $147,083,799 $164,281,502 $181,995,136 $200,240,180 $219,032,574 $395,418 $802,699 $1,222,198 $1,654,282 $2,099,329 $2,557,727 $3,029,877 $3,516,192 $4,017,096 $4,533,027 $5,064,436 $5,611,787 $6,175,559 $395,418 $1,198,117 $2,420,315 $4,074,598 $6,173,927 $8,731,654 $11,761,531 $15,277,723 $19,294,819 $23,827,846 $28,892,281 $34,504,069 $40,679,628 $26,756,633 $40,739,940 $55,142,746 $69,977,636 $85,257,572 $100,995,907 $117,206,392 $133,903,191 $151,100,894 $168,814,529 $187,059,572 $205,851,967 $225,208,133 (1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post -permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually. Assumptions 31,523 impact acres developed 14 year plan 3% interest rate (real, net) $6,756,244 annual post -permit cost estimate $5,854 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation $6,756,244 Endowment Funding - 10 Year Extension Scenario New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 $3,982 Endowment Fee Annual Endowment Funding $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 $8,966,410 Endowment Balance $8,966,410 $17,932,819 $27,168,221 $36,680,686 $46,478,524 $56,570,297 $66,964,823 $77,671,185 $88,698,738 $100,057,118 $111,756,249 $123,806,354 $136,217,962 $149,001,918 $162,169,393 $175,731,892 $189,701,266 $204,089,722 $218,909,831 Annual Interest $0 $268,992 $546,054 $831,428 $1,125,363 $1,428,117 $1,739,952 $2,061,143 $2,391,970 $2,732,721 $3,083,695 $3,445,198 $3,817,547 $4,201,065 $4,596,089 $5,002,964 $5,422,046 $5,853,699 $6,298,303 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $268,992 $815,047 $1,646,475 $2,771,838 $4,199,955 $5,939,907 $8,001,051 $10,393,020 $13,125,742 $16,209,437 $19,654,635 $23,472,182 $27,673,247 $32,269,336 $37,272,301 $42,694,347 $48,548,046 $54,846,349 Total Endowment $8,966,410 $18,201,812 $27,714,276 $37,512,114 $47,603,887 $57,998,413 $68,704,775 $79,732,328 $91,090,708 $102,789,839 $114,839,944 $127,251,552 $140,035,508 $153,202,983 $166,765,482 $180,734,856 $195,123,312 $209,943,421 $225,208,133 Average Annual Post Permit Interest (1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post -permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually. Assumptions 42,782 impact acres developed 19 year plan 3% interest rate (real, net) $6,756,244 annual post -permit cost estimate $3,982 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation $6,756,244 Endowment Funding - 15 Year Extension Scenario New Impact Acres (avg. annual) 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 Average Per Acre $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 Endowment Fee Annual Endowment Funding $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 Endowment Balance $6,541,714 $13,083,429 $19,821,394 $26,761,499 $33,909,807 $41,272,564 Annual Interest $0 $196,251 $398,390 $606,594 $821,043 $1,041,925 Cumulative Interest Earnings $0 $196,251 $594,642 $1,201,235 $2,022,278 $3,064,204 Total Endowment $6,541,714 $13,279,680 $20,219,785 $27,368,093 $34,730,850 $42,314,490 Average Annual Post Permit Interest 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 2,252 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $48,856,204 $56,667,353 $64,712,836 $72,999,684 $81,535,138 $90,326,655 $99,381,917 $108,708,838 $118,315,566 $1,269,435 $1,503,769 $1,745,134 $1,993,739 $2,249,803 $2,513,548 $2,785,206 $3,065,014 $3,353,216 $4,333,638 $5,837,407 $7,582,541 $9,576,280 $11,826,083 $14,339,631 $17,124,837 $20,189,851 $23,543,067 $50,125,639 $58,171,122 $66,457,970 $74,993,424 $83,784,941 $92,840,203 $102,167,123 $111,773,852 $121,668,781 2,252 2,252 2,252 $2,905 $2,905 $2,905 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $6,541,714 $128,210,496 $138,402,273 $148,899,805 $159,712,262 $170,849,092 $182,320,028 $194,135,092 $206,304,607 $218,839,209 $3,650,063 $3,955,817 $4,270,743 $4,595,116 $4,929,221 $5,273,349 $5,627,801 $5,992,887 $6,368,925 $27,193,130 $31,148,947 $35,419,689 $40,014,806 $44,944,027 $50,217,377 $55,845,178 $61,838,065 $68,206,990 $131,860,559 $142,358,090 $153,170,547 $164,307,378 $175,778,314 $187,593,377 $199,762,893 $212,297,494 $225,208,133 $6,756,244 (1) Endowment fee set to ensure that, at the end of the permit term, the total endowment (Including endowment fee revenues and interest) are sufficient to provide annual interest revenues equal to the post -permit annual cost. The real interest rate is assumed to be 3 percent annually. 54,040 impact acres developed 24 year plan 3% interest rate (real, net) $6,756,244 annual post -permit cost estimate $2,905 Endowment Funding Per Acre of Conservation Appendix G - TUMF 2016 Program Update Disposition of Network Change Requests As part of the 2024 update of the TUMF Nexus Study, the list of proposed improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional impacts of new development in the TUMF Network Cost Estimate table included in the previously adopted Nexus Study was reviewed for accuracy. In particular, the Network Cost table was reviewed to ensure the included projects were consistent with the mitigation needs identified by the RivCoM future year no -build traffic conditions. To assist in the review of the Network Cost Estimate table, participating local jurisdictions, private developers and the Riverside County Transportation Commission were asked to submit requests for changes to the TUMF Network. The various requests for network changes were subsequently reviewed for consistency with the program guidelines for inclusion on the TUMF Network and to determine if future traffic impacts would be sufficient to require mitigation primarily utilizing the RivCoM future no -build scenario outputs to quantify impacts as well as screening the various qualitative measures that have guided the TUMF Network development since program inception. Based on the findings of the review of the entire TUMF network, elements of specific projects were revised to reflect only necessary network corrections, modifications to project assumptions and to incorporate a limited number of additional improvements. The preliminary results of the network review and the associated screening of specific requested projects was presented to the WRCOG Public Works Directors Committee (PWC) in August 2023. Updated screening results were presented to the PWC in February 2024 and the findings endorsed confirming the TUMF Network as the basis for the Draft 2024 Nexus Study that was subsequently presented to the PWC for review and comment in April 2024. A matrix summarizing the disposition of the specific project requests received as part of the 2024 TUMF Nexus Update is included as Exhibit G-1 in this Appendix. With the release of the Draft 2024 Nexus Update Study Report for a formal review period commencing on May 14, 2024, and ending on June 10, 2024, additional comments were provided to WRCOG staff by thirteen participating jurisdictions or other stakeholders. These comments were reviewed by WRCOG staff and responses were provided to each of the parties that submitted comments. The responses included several changes to the TUMF network to remedy typographical errors contained in the draft report, including misreporting in the number of existing lanes, project percent complete and interchange project type for approximately 10 TUMF network segments. The recommended network revisions were presented to the PWC on August 8, 2024, and are reflected in the TUMF network cost table included in Exhibit H-1. WRCOG G-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT G-1 2024 TUMF Ne— Study Update - Network Addition Requests Northwest Zone Pass Zone EasNale Hellman RiVef Road Walter Recommendation Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency EasNale Hellman Schleisman Walter Add to network for continuity and mitigate future We deficiency EasNale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge Add to network for continuity and mitigate future v/c deficiency EasNale River Rd Archibald Hellman Add to network for continuity and mitigate future We deficiency EasNale Limonite ITS Citywide Atltl to network for deficient links with no capacity increase EasNale Hamner ITS citywide Add to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase EasNale Schliesman ITS City Wide Add to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase Eastvale Archibald ITS city wide Atltl to networks for deficient links with no capacity increase EasNale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge Bridge length increased to 500' Riverside Pr d Chicago Iowa Do not add - no V/C deficiency and interchange owmrossing reconstructed to 4 lanes in 2006-2007 Riverside La Sierra ITS SR-91 Victoria Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside Madison ITS SR-91 Victoria Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside University ITS Market S[ Canyon Crest Atltl to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Riverside Tyler ITS California Ave Indiana Ave Do not add - no V/C deficiency Riverside JAIessandro Blvd ITS Fairview Ave Meridian Add to network for deficient links with no capacity increase County I Markham St Mockingbird Canyon Wood Rd Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency rC%1 Street C. Name Hemet Stetson Recommendation IWarren 0.85 Miles w/o Warren Do not add- no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency San Jacinto 7th St Western Terminus Warren Rd Do not atltl - no future v/0 deficiency Sanlacinto 7st St Channel adjacent to Warren bridge Do not add - no future v/c deficiency !I Recommendation Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley ov/c deficiency Banning Cottonwood-10 interchange Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home ov/c deficiency Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge Ntwork- Bridge added WM I Recommendation Lake Elsinore Camino del Norte Summerhill Main Do not atltl -no connectivity to regional network Lake Elsinore Summerhill Railroad Canyon Greenwald Do not add- no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Lake Elsinore Nichols 1-15 Lake Already on TUMF Network Wildomar Inland Valley Dr 1-15 bridge Do not add- no connectivity to regional network Wildomar Palomar Starbuck Washington P�------- Wildomar Bundy Canyon 1-15 City Limits (Sunset) Murrieta Orange Springs Parkway Clinton Keith Scott Do not atltl - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Calle del Oso Oro Vineyard Pkwy Washington Do not add - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Calle del Oso Oro 1500 w/o Vineyard Pkwy bridge Do not atltl - no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Murrieta Adams Murrieta Hot Springs/Hawthorne Cherry Do not add- no regional connectivity or V/C deficiency Temecula ynez Road Rancho California Santiago Do not atltl- no connectivity to regional network Temecula ynez Road/DePortoIa Road Santiago Margarita Do not add - no connectivity to regional network Temecula ITS Major Arterials (Winchester, Rancho California, Butterfield Stage, Temecula Pkwv, Margarita Jefferson City limits Atltl to network for deficient links with no capacity increase Appendix H - TUMF Network Cost Estimate and Evaluation For the purpose of calculating the "fair share" fee to be applied to new development under the TUMF program, a planning level cost estimate was developed to reflect the cost to complete improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials to adequately accommodate future traffic growth. The planning level cost estimate was established by applying the unit cost values (presented in Table 4.1) to the proposed changes identified for the future Regional System of Highways and Arterials. The resultant cost value was tabulated for each unique segment of the network, by improvement type, based on the proposed list of improvements recommended following the review of the TUMF Network (as described in Section 4.3, Appendix E and Appendix G). A separate cost estimate was generated for regional transit improvements based on information provided by RTA and added to the summary table. The TUMF Network cost estimate table is summarized in Table 4.4 of the Nexus Report. The detailed TUMF Network cost estimate table is included in this Appendix as Exhibit H-1. The detailed TUMF transit cost estimate table is included as Table 4.5 of the Nexus Report. Where existing obligated funding has previously been secured through traditional funding sources to complete necessary improvements to the TUMF Network, the cost of these improvements will not be recaptured from future developments through the TUMF program. As a result, the TUMF network cost was adjusted accordingly to reflect the availability of obligated funds. WRCOG staff, in consultation with RCTC staff, reviewed the current Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) to identify transportation projects on the TUMF network that had previously secured alternate sources of funding. Exhibit H-2 identifies those projects included on the TUMF Network having previously obligated funding. To account for existing needs in the original TUMF Nexus Study, the cost for facilities identified as currently experiencing LOS E or F was adjusted by extracting the share of the cost to improve the portion of those facilities identified in the 2018 Baseline network scenario with a volume to capacity ratio of greater than 0.90, which is the threshold for LOS E. The adjustment to account for existing need as part of the TUMF Nexus Study provides for the mitigation of incremental traffic growth on those facilities with existing need. The following approach was applied to account for incremental traffic growth associated with new development as part of the existing need methodology: 1. 1. Facilities with an existing need were identified by reviewing the RivCoM 2018 Baseline scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network and delineating those facilities included on the TUMF Cost Fee Summary Table that have an average directional v/c exceeding 0.90. a. Weighted directional v/c values were used to determine existing need for network segments, which was calculated by: WRCOG H-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 i. Determining the length for the portion of each segment (model link), and calculating the ratio of link length to the overall segment length ii. Generating the average directional v/c for each link, for both directions in AM and PM periods, and multiplying by link/segment length ratio iii. Determining the maximum peak -period peak -direction v/c for each link, representing the highest directional v/c in either AM or PM iv. Calculating weighted average v/c for each TUMF segment, based on the sum of all weighted max v/c values of each link within a segment b. A similar method was used to determine existing need for spot improvements including interchanges, railroad crossings and bridges. However, no weighting was used in the calculation of existing need for spot improvements. For these facilities, the peak -period peak -direction v/c values (highest directional v/c in either AM or PM) were utilized in the existing need calculation. This was based on the individual link within a network segment where a bridge or railroad crossing is located, or on - and off -ramps in the case of interchanges. 2. Initial costs of addressing the existing need were calculated by estimating the share of a particular roadway segments "new lane" cost, or individual spot improvement cost (including all associated ROW and soft costs). 3. Incremental growth in v/c was determined by comparing the average directional base year v/c for the TUMF facilities (delineated under step one) with the horizon year v/c for the corresponding segments and spot improvements calculated based on the RivCoM 2045 No -Build scenario assigned traffic on the 2021 existing network using the same methodology as the base year v/c. 4. The proportion of the incremental growth attributable to new development was determined by dividing the result of step three with the total 2045 No -Build scenario v/c in excess of LOS E. 5. For those segments experiencing a net increase in v/c over the base year, TUMF will 'discount' the cost of existing need improvements by the proportion of the incremental v/c growth through 2045 No -Build compared to the 2018 Baseline v/c (up to a maximum of 100%). Exhibit H-2 includes a detailed breakdown of the existing highway improvement needs on the TUMF network, including the associated unfunded improvement cost estimate for each segment experiencing unacceptable LOS. For transit service improvements, the cost to provide for existing demand was determined by multiplying the total transit component cost by the share of future WRCOG H-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 projected daily bus transit ridership representing existing demand. Exhibit H-3 reflects the calculation of the existing transit need share and the existing transit need cost. To validate the effectiveness of the TUMF Network improvements to mitigate the cumulative regional transportation impacts of new development in Western Riverside County, the future TUMF Network was evaluated. The proposed improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials were coded on the 2021 existing network derived from RivCoM and the model was run to determine the relative impacts on traffic conditions. To quantify the impacts of the TUMF Network improvements, the various traffic measures of effectiveness described in Section 3.1 for the 2018 Baseline and 2045 No -Build scenarios were calculated for the 2045 TUMF Build network scenario. The results for VMT, VHT, VHD, and total VMT experiencing unacceptable level of service (LOS E) were then compared to the results presented in Table 3.1 for the no -build conditions. The consolidated results are provided in Table 4.6. WRCOG H-3 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Ethanac Goetz Murneta Backbone 0.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac Murrieta I-215 Backbone 0.90 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Ethanac 1-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Menifee Ethanac Sherman Matthews Backbone 0.61 2 4 0% 1.23 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,388,000 $601,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $347,000 $199,000 $2,674,000 $2,674,000 Central Menifee Ethanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossinq Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $105,560,000 Central Menifee Menifee SR-74 Winacate) Simpson Backbone 2.50 2 4 88% 0.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $678,000 $294,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $170,000 $97,000 $1,307,000 $1,307,000 Central Menifee Menifee Sall Creek brdge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 315 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,024,000 $0 $0 $302,000 $756,000 $302,000 $4,384,000 $4,384,000 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate Backbone 0.64 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergate Newport Backbone 0.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland Backbone 1.07 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Garbani Backbone 1.03 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Garbani Scott Backbone 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,260,000 $978,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $565,000 $324,000 $4,353,000 $4,353,000 Central Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scott Murneta City Limit Backbone 0.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Murrieta Backbone 1.81 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Murneta 1-215 Backbone 1.99 4 6 87% 0.52 1 3 0 0 0 0 $586,000 $254,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $147,000 $84,000 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 Central Menifee Newport 1-215 Menifee Backbone 1.02 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Menifee Undenbeaer Backbone 0.77 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Lindenberqer SR-79 (Winchester) Backbone 3.58 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott 1-215 Brigqs Backbone 1.98 4 6 0% 3.96 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,483,000 $1,941,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,000 $1,121,000 $642,000 $8,635,000 $8,635,000 Central Menifee Scott 1-215 interchanqe Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott Sunset Murneta Backbone 1.01 2 4 0% 2.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,278,000 $986,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,000 $570,000 $326,000 $4,388,000 $4,388,000 Central Menifee Scott Murrieta 1-215 Backbone 1.94 2 6 0% 7.77 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,799,000 $3,809,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $880,000 $2,200,000 $1,261,000 $16,949,000 $12,949,000 Central Menifee SR-74 Matthews Brigqs Backbone 1.89 4 6 0% 3.79 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,285,000 $1.855,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $429,000 $1,071,000 $614,000 $8,254,000 $8,254,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro 1-215 Penis Backbone 3.52 4 6 75% 1.76 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,992,000 $9,574,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $199,000 $498,000 $1,157,000 $13,420,000 $13,420,000 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason Backbone 2.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach Backbone 0.99 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs Backbone 4.13 2 4 0% 8.26 1 3 0 0 0 0 $9,355,000 $4,049,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $936,000 $2,339,000 $1,340,000 $18,019,000 $18,019,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 Alessandro Backbone 1.67 2 4 0% 3.34 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,785,000 $1,639,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $379,000 $946,000 $542,000 $7,291,000 $7,291,000 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Sprinqs SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Penis Reche Vista Ironwood Backbone 2.09 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead Backbone 0.52 4 4 80% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Penis SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $11,192,000 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus Backbone 2.00 4 4 25% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Penis Cactus Hariev Knox Backbone 3.64 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Vista Country Heacock Backbone 0.44 2 4 0% 0.88 2 2 0 0 0 0 $1,531,000 $4,787,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,000 $383,000 $632,000 $7,486,000 $3,799,000 Central Penis 11 th/Case Penis Goetz Backbone 0.30 2 4 0% 0.60 1 2 0 0 0 0 $680,000 $3,269,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $68,000 $170,000 $395,000 $4,582,000 $4,582,000 Central Perris Case Goetz 1-215 Backbone 2.36 2 4 42% 2.74 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,099,000 $14,893,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $310,000 $775,000 $1,799,000 $20,876,000 $20,876,000 Central Penis Case San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 125 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $120,000 $300,000 $120,000 $1,740,000 $1,235,000 Central Perris Ethanac Keystone Goetz Backbone 2.24 0 2 38% 2.78 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,144,000 $1,361,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $314,000 $786,000 $451,000 $6,056,000 $6,056,000 Central Penis Ethanac San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Central Perris Ethanac 1-215 Sherman Backbone 0.35 2 4 0% 0.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $789,000 $3,793,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $458,000 $5,316,000 $5,316,000 Central Penis Goetz Case Ethanac Backbone 2.16 2 4 84% 0.69 1 3 0 0 0 0 $782,000 $339,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $196,000 $112,000 $1,507,000 $999,000 Central Perris Goetz San Jacinto River brdge Backbone 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $3,398,000 Central Penis Mid-Countv(Placentia) 1-215 Penis Backbone 0.87 0 4 41% 2.05 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,324,000 $11,169,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232,000 $581,000 $1,349,000 $15,655,000 $15,655,000 Central Perris Mid -County (Placentia) 1-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) Penis Evans Backbone 1.57 0 4 52% 3.01 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,412,000 $16,398,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $341,000 $853,000 $1,981,000 $22,985,000 $22,985,000 Central Perris Mid -County (Placentia) Perris Valley Storm Channel brdge Backbone 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Penis Penis Hariev Knox Ramona Backbone 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Ramona Citrus Backbone 2.49 4 6 35% 3.24 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,667,000 $1,587,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $367,000 $917,000 $525,000 $7,063,000 $7,063,000 Central Penis Penis Citrus Nuevo Backbone 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Perris Nuevo 11 th Backbone 1.75 2 4 74% 0.91 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,028,000 $4,942,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $103,000 $257,000 $597,000 $6,927,000 $6,927,000 Central Penis Penis 1-215 overcrossinq bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ramona 1-215 Perris Backbone 1.44 4 6 77% 0.66 1 2 0 0 0 0 $748,000 $3,595,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $187,000 $434,000 $5,039,000 $5,039,000 Central Penis Ramona 1-215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $7,725,000 Central Perris Ramona Perris Evans Backbone 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Ramona Evans Mid -County t2,800 ft E of Rider) Backbone 2.62 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (41h) Ellis 1-215 Backbone 2.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Ethanac SR-74 Keystone Backbone 1.07 0 2 0% 2.14 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,422,000 $1,049,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $606,000 $347,000 $4,666,000 $4,666,000 Central Unincorporated Gilman Sprinqs Alessandro Bridge Road Backbone 5.00 2 4 0% 9.99 2 3 0 0 0 0 $17,389,000 $4.897,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,739,000 $4,347,000 $2,229,000 $30,601,000 $30,601,000 Central Unincorporated Menifee Nuevo SR-74 fPinacate) Backbone 4.07 2 4 6% 7.65 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,662,000 $3,749,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $866,000 $2,166,000 $1,241,000 $16,684,000 $16,684,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County Evans Ramona(2,800 it E of Rider) Backbone 0.77 0 4 0% 3.08 3 3 0 0 0 0 $7,238,000 $1,509,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $724,000 $1,810,000 $875,000 $12,156,000 $12,156,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Pico Avenue Backbone 0.44 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge Road Backbone 5.95 2 6 8% 21.91 1 3 0 0 0 0 $24,800,000 $10,735,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,480,000 $6,200,000 $3,554,000 $47,769,000 $47,769,000 Central Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $24,960,000 $0 $0 $2,496,000 $6,240,000 $2,496,000 $36,192,000 $36,192,000 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon San Bernardino County Reche Vista Backbone 3.35 2 2 0% 0.00 3 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Vista Reche Canyon Country Backbone 1.22 2 2 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Scott Brigqs SR-79 (Winchester) Backbone 3.04 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated SR-74 Ethanac Ellis Backbone 2.72 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Calalco 1-15 Temescal Canyon Backbone 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Calalco 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Paseo Grande Lincoln Backbone 2.60 4 4 0% 0.00 3 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 3 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California Backbone 2.81 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill California 1-15 Backbone 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River SR-91 Dominguez Ranch Backbone 0.52 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Dominquez Ranch Palisades Backbone 0.56 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Paseo Grande Backbone 2.01 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman San Bernardino County 600' e/o Cucamonqa Creek Backbone 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $446,000 $45,000 $112,000 $45,000 $648,000 $648,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Cucamonqa Creek brdge Backbone 0.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison Backbone 0.87 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $597,000 $60,000 $149,000 $60,000 $866,000 $866,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Harrison Sumner Backbone 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $34,000 $84,000 $34,000 $488,000 $488,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Sumner Scholar Backbone 0.50 2 4 0% 1.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,132,000 $5,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $283,000 $657,000 $7,625,000 $7,625,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman Scholar AStreet Backbone 0.31 5 6 95% 0.02 1 2 0 0 0 0 $I8,000 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $5,000 $10,000 $119,000 $119,000 Northwest Eastvale Schleisman AStreet Hamner Backbone 0.27 4 6 95% 0.03 1 2 0 0 0 0 $31,000 $149,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $8,000 $18,000 $209,000 $209,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR-60 Bellegrave Backbone 1.57 4 6 0% 3.14 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,552,000 $17,071,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $355,000 $888,000 $2,062,000 $23,928,000 $10,461,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Bellegmve Santa Ana River Backbone 3.99 4 6 0% 7.99 1 2 0 0 0 0 $9,041,000 $43,446,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $904,000 $2,260,000 $5,249,000 $60,900,000 $0 Northwest Riverside Alessandro Arlington Trautwein Backbone 2.42 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,662,000 $166,000 $416,000 $166,000 $2,410,000 $2,410,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington La Siena Maqnolia Backbone 5.84 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arington Magnolia Alessandro Backbone 2.73 4 6 0% 5.46 2 2 0 0 0 0 $9,504,000 $29,713,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $2,376,000 $3,922,000 $46,465,000 $46,465,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Santa Ana River SR-91 Backbone 3.81 4 6 91% 0.69 1 2 0 0 0 0 $776,000 $3,731,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $194,000 $451,000 $5,230,000 $4,392,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren SR-91 Mockingbird Canyon Backbone 3.08 4 6 16% 5.18 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,863,000 $28,174,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $586,000 $1,466,000 $3,404,000 $39,493,000 $21,292,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Wood Trautwein Backbone 0.43 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Trautwein Orange Terrace Backbone 1.27 5 6 22% 0.99 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,124,000 $5,404,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000 $281,000 $653,000 $7,574,000 $7,574,000 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Trautwein Vista Grande Backbone 1.22 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Alessandro Vista Grande 1-215 Backbone 1.26 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco El Sobrante Harev John Backbone 0.86 2 6 0% 3.46 2 3 0 0 0 0 $6,012,000 $1,693,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $601,000 $1,503,000 $771,000 $10,580,000 $9,817,000 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco Harley John Hall Backbone 5.81 2 6 6% 21.83 1 2 0 0 0 0 $24,716,000 $118,776,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,472,000 $6,179,000 $14,349,000 $166,492,000 $166,492,000 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco Harvil 1-215 Backbone 0.28 4 6 0% 0.57 1 3 0 0 0 0 $643,000 $278,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $161,000 $92,000 $1,238,000 $1,238,000 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco Temescal Canyon La Sierra Backbone 3.21 2 6 2% 12.57 3 3 0 0 0 0 $29,533,000 $6,158,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,953,000 $7,383,000 $3,569,000 $49,596,000 $35,953,000 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco Temescal Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 3 3 0 175 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 $0 $0 $336,000 $840,000 $336,000 $4,872,000 $1,907,000 Northwest Unincorporated Calalco La Sierra El Sobrante Backbone 6.11 2 6 0% 24.44 3 3 0 0 0 0 $57,434,000 $11,976,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,743,000 $14,359,000 $6,941,000 $96,453,000 $96,453,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Mockingbird Canyon Wood Backbone 4.42 4 6 0% 8.84 1 2 0 0 0 0 $10,010,000 $48,104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,001,000 $2,503,000 $5,811,000 $67,429,000 $67,429,000 Northwest Unincorporated Van Buren Orange Terrace 1-215 Backbone 1.89 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Pass Banning Highland Spnnas Wilson (8th) Sun Lakes Backbone 0.76 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs I-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $32,516,000 Pass Banning Highland Springs Oak Valley 04th) Wilson (8th) Backbone 0.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley (I 4th) Backbone 1.53 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning-lOBypass South 1-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) Backbone 3.29 0 2 0% 6.57 1 2 0 0 0 0 $7,439,000 $35,748,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $744,000 $1,860,000 $4,319,000 $50,110,000 $50,110,0130 Pass Banninq-10 Bypass South 1-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Banning -10 Bypass South San Gorgonio bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Pass Banning -10 Bypass South UP/Hargrave railroad crossing Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,400,000 $0 $3,640,000 $9,100,000 $3,640,000 $52,780,000 $52,780,000 Pass Beaumont Beaumont Oak Valley (1 4th) 1-10 Backbone 1.37 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Oak Valley (San Timoteo Cam SR-60 Backbone 0.72 2 4 65% 0.50 1 3 0 0 0 0 $571,000 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $143,000 $82,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $29,561,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero UP railroad crossing Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,600,000 $0 $2,760,000 $6,900,000 $2,760,000 $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Pass Beaumont Potrero Noble Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 4th Backbone 0.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) 1-10 California Backbone 1.15 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) 1-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $7,408,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley 1-10 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $59,773,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley Roberts St Roberti Rd Backbone 0.70 2 4 0% 1.40 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,585,000 $686,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $396,000 $227,000 $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Bellflower Noble Backbone 1.47 0 2 0% 2.94 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,328,000 $1,441,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $333,000 $832,000 $477,000 $6,411,000 $6,411,000 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Vallev Highland Springs Bellflower Backbone 0.44 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Valley Noble Roberts St Backbone 3.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Cherry Vallev San Timoteo Wash bridge Backbone 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated SR-79 (Lamb Canyon) California Gilman Springs Backbone 5.23 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domeniqoni Warren Sanderson Backbone 1.77 4 6 0% 3.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,011,000 $1,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000 $1,003,000 $575,000 $7,726,000 $7,726,000 San Jacinto Hemet Domeniqoni Sanderson State Backbone 2.14 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 Winchester Warren Backbone 2.59 4 6 11% 4.62 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,227,000 $25,117,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $523,000 $1,307,000 $3,034,000 $35,208,000 $35,208,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Warren Sanderson Backbone 1.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemet BvDc interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Sanderson State Backbone 2.39 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona State Main Backbone 2.66 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Main Cedar Backbone 2.40 0 4 57% 4.13 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,679,000 $22,485,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $468,000 $1,170,000 $2,716,000 $31,518,000 $26,928,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Cedar SR-74 Backbone 1.10 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domeniqoni SR-79 )Winchester) Warren Backbone 3.10 4 6 0% 6.20 1 3 0 0 0 0 $7,013,000 $3,036,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $701,000 $1,753,000 $1,005,000 $13,508,000 $13,508,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Domeniqoni San Diego Aqueduct bridge Backbone 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Bridge Sanderson Backbone 2.95 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporated Mid -County (Ramona) Bridge Warren Backbone 2.35 2 4 10% 4.23 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,787,000 $2,072,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $479,000 $1,197.000 $686,000 $9,221,000 $9,221,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-74 Briggs SR-79 )Winchester) Backbone 3.54 4 6 0% 7.07 1 3 0 0 0 0 $8,004,000 $3,465,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $2,001,000 $1,147,000 $15,417,000 $15,417,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 Memet Bvoassl SR-74(Florida) Domeniqoni Backbone 3.22 0 2 1% 6.38 1 3 0 0 0 0 $7,217,000 $3,124,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $722,000 $1,804,000 $1,034,000 $13,901,000 $13,901,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Hemet Bypassl San Diego Aqueduct bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-791Hemet Bypassl Domeniqoni Winchester Backbone 1.50 0 2 0% 3.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,396,000 $1,470,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $340,000 $849,000 $487,000 $6,542,000 $6,542,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (San Jacinto Bypass) Mid -County (Ramona) SR-74 )Florida) Backbone 6.50 0 4 0% 26.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $29,432,000 $12,740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,943,000 $7,358,000 $4,217,000 $56,690,000 $56,690,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-791Sandersonl Gilman Springs Ramona Backbone 1.58 4 6 0% 3.16 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,582,000 $1,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $358,000 $896,000 $513,000 $6,899,000 $2,555,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Sanderson) San Jacinto River bridge Backbone 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 I A00 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $13,440,000 $0 $0 $1,344,000 $3,360,000 $1,344,000 $19,488,000 $7,651,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Domeniqoni Keller Backbone 4.90 4 6 13% 8.53 1 2 0 0 0 0 $9,653,000 $46,387,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $965,000 $2,413,000 $5,604,000 $65,022,000 $65,022,000 Southwest Canyon Lake Goetz Railroad Canyon Newport Backbone 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills Goetz Backbone 1.95 6 6 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon 1-15 Canyon Hills Backbone 2.36 6 6 50% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63.061.000 $24.162.000 Southwest Mumeta Clinton Keith Copper Craft Toulon Backbone 1.31 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest MU meta Clinton Keith Toulon 1-215 Backbone 0.90 4 6 47% 0.95 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,078,000 $466,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000 $270,000 $154,000 $2,076,000 $2,076,000 Southwest Mu Clinton Keith 1-215 Whitewood Backbone 0.75 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest meta MU meta French Valley (Date) Murrieta Hot Springs Winchester Creek Backbone 0.24 0 4 0% 0.96 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,087,000 $5,222,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,000 $272,000 $631,000 $7,321,000 $7,321,000 Southwest Mu French Valley (Date) Winchester Creek Margarita Backbone 0.61 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest meta MU meta Whitewood Menifee City Limit Keller Backbone 0.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whitewood Keller Clinton Keith Backbone 2.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Jefferson Diaz Backbone 0.56 0 2 54% 0.52 1 2 0 0 0 0 $583,000 $2.803,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,000 $146,000 $339,000 $3,929,000 $3,929,000 Southwest Temecula French Vallev (Cherry) Murrieta Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 420 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $4,032,000 $0 $0 $403,000 $1,008,000 $403,000 $5,846,000 $5,846,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Margarita Ynez Backbone 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Vallev (Date) Ynez Jefferson Backbone 0.73 0 2 55% 0.66 1 2 0 0 0 0 $744,000 $3,574,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 $186,000 $432,000 $5,010,000 $5,010,000 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 1 0 0 0 $0 $0 $84,190,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,419,000 $21,048,000 $8,419,000 $122,076,000 $122,076,000 Southwest Temecula SR-791Winchesterl Murrieta Hot Springs Jefferson Backbone 2.71 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,860,000 $186,000 $465,000 $186,000 $2,697,000 $2,697,000 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Westem Bypass (Diazl Cherry Rancho California Backbone 2.14 0 2 93% 0.30 1 2 0 0 0 0 $339,000 $1,630,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $85,000 $197,000 $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Westem Bypass (Vincent Marc Rancho California SR-79 (Front) Backbone 1.48 0 2 15% 2.52 3 2 0 0 0 0 $5,913,000 $13,687,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,478,000 $1,960,000 $23,629,000 $23,629,000 Southwest Temecula Westem Bypass (Vincent Morc 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 3 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Westem Bypass (Vincent Morc Mumeta Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 3 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Unincorporated Benton SR-79 Eastern Bypass Backbone 2.40 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Whitewood SR-79 Backbone 2.54 0 4 75% 2.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,875,000 $1,245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $719,000 $412,000 $5,539,000 $5,539,000 Southwest Unincorporated Clinton Keith Warm Springs Creek bridge Backbone 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated SR-74 1-15 Ethanac Backbone 4.97 4 6 9% 9.05 2 3 0 0 0 0 $15,740,000 $4,433,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,574,000 $3,935,000 $2,017,000 $27,699,000 $26,347,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-791Winchesterl Keller Thompson Backbone 2.47 4 6 9% 4.49 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,079,000 $24,407,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $508,000 $1,270,000 $2,949,000 $34,213,000 $34,213,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Thompson La Alba Backbone 1.82 4 6 0% 3.63 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,112,000 $19,761,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $411,000 $1,028,000 $2,387,000 $27,699,000 $27,699,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-791Winchesterl La Alba Hunter Backbone 0.51 4 6 0% 1.03 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,166,000 $5,602,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $292,000 $677,000 $7,854,000 $3,042,000 Southwest Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) Hunter Mumeta Hot Springs Backbone 1.14 4 6 88% 0.27 1 3 0 0 0 0 $309,000 $134,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $31,000 $77,000 $44,000 $595,000 $442,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundv Canyon 1-15 Monte Vista Backbone 0.22 4 6 0% 0.44 2 3 0 0 0 0 $774,000 $218,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $194,000 $99,000 $1,362,000 $1,362,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Monte Vista Sunset Backbone 3.14 2 4 0% 6.29 3 3 0 0 0 0 $14,778,000 $3,081,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,478,000 $3,695,000 $1,786,000 $24,818,000 $24,818,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundv Canyon 1-15 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $24,613,000 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith Palomar 1-15 Backbone 0.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith 1-15 Copper Craft Backbone 1.96 2 4 58% 1.64 2 3 0 0 0 0 $2,858,000 $805,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $286,000 $715,000 $366,000 $5,030,000 $0 Subtotal Backbone 269.95 318.02 11 8,835 3 7.14 $438,352,000 $682,621,000 $435,330,000 $74,976,000 $136,800,000 $4,901,000 $109,037,000 $272,606,000 $177,298,000 $2,331,921,000 $1,961,707,000 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Central Menifee Briqqs Newport Scott Secondary 3.05 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briqqs SR-74 Winacate) Simpson Secondary 2.54 2 4 73% 1.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,553,000 $672,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $388,000 $223,000 $2,991,000 $2,991,000 Central Menifee Mods Simpson Old Newport Secondary 1.50 0 2 17% 2.49 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,819,000 $1,220,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $282,000 $705,000 $404,000 $5,430,000 $5,430,000 Central Menifee Mods Salt Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 600 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Menifee Garbani I-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $42,483,000 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane Secondary 2.61 2 4 0% 5.22 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,907,000 $2,557,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,477,000 $846,000 $11,378,000 $11,378,000 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanita Secondary 1.36 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Muni Bradley Secondary 1.03 2 4 0% 2.06 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,332,000 $11,206,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $233,000 $583,000 $1,354,000 $15,708,000 $15,708,000 Central Menifee Holland Bradley Haun Secondary 0.75 2 4 0% 1.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,698,000 $8,160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $425,000 $986,000 $11,439,000 $11,439,000 Central Menifee Holland Haun Antelope Secondary 0.31 0 4 0% 1.24 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,404,000 $6,746,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $351,000 $815,000 $9,456,000 $9,456,000 Central Menifee Holland I-215 overcrossinq bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 350 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $6,720,000 $0 $0 $672,000 $1,680,000 $672,000 $9,744,000 $9,744,000 Central Menifee Holland Antelope Menifee Secondary 0.70 2 4 64% 0.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $571,000 $2,742,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $143,000 $331,000 $3,844,000 $3.844,000 Central Menifee McCall I-215 Aspel Secondary 1.23 4 6 0% 2.46 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,780,000 $1,203,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,000 $695,000 $398,000 $5,354,000 $5,354,000 Central Menifee McCall 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee Secondary 0.95 2 4 45% 1.05 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,188,000 $514,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $119,000 $297,000 $170,000 $2,288,000 $2,288,000 Central Menifee Murrieta Ethanac McCall Secondary 1.95 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Munieta McCall Newport Secondary 2.03 2 4 10% 3.65 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,136,000 $1,790,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $414,000 $1,034,000 $593,000 $7,967,000 $7,967,000 Central Menifee Munieta Newport Bundy Canyon Secondary 3.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus 1-215 Heacock Secondary 2.17 4 6 83% 0.74 1 2 0 0 0 0 $834,000 $4,007,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $83,000 $209,000 $484,000 $5,617,000 $5,617,000 Central Moreno Valley Cactus 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR-60 Secondary 0.28 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 Eucalyptus Secondary 0.77 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus 1-215 Townqate Secondary 1.00 4 6 42% 1.16 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,313,000 $6,309,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,000 $328,000 $762,000 $8,843,000 $8.843,000 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Townqate Frederick Secondary 0.67 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock Secondary 1.01 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitchinq Secondary 1.01 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitchinq Moreno Beach Secondary 2.42 4 4 98% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore Secondary 2.28 4 4 47% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Frederck SR-60 Alessandro Secondary 1.63 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele Secondary 2.79 4 4 77% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus Secondary 4.73 4 4 92% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox Secondary 0.74 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood SR-60 Day Secondary 1.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock Secondary 2.01 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle John F Kennedy Oleander Secondary 3.16 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon SR-60 Secondary 1.23 2 4 0% 2.47 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,790,000 $13,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $279,000 $698,000 $1,620,000 $18,797,000 $18,797,000 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR-60 overcrossinq bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 250 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Nason SR-60 Alessandro Secondary 1.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Piqeon Pass Ironwood SR-60 Secondary 0.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Piqeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Salinas Ironwood Secondary 2.66 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust Secondary 0.35 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro Secondary 2.75 2 4 5% 5.22 1 2 0 0 0 0 $5,907,000 $28,385,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $591,000 $1,477,000 $3,429,000 $39,789,000 $39,789,000 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 Eucalyptus Secondary 0.26 2 4 0% 0.52 1 2 0 0 0 0 $589,000 $2,829,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $147,000 $342,000 $3,966,000 $3,966,000 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Central Penis Ellis Goetz Evans Secondary 1.27 0 4 14% 4.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,945,000 $2,141,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,000 $1,236,000 $709,000 $9,526,000 $9,526,000 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Evans Ramona Morqan Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Morqan Rider Secondary 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Evans Rider Placentia Secondary 0.56 2 2 79% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Placentia Nuevo Secondary 1.52 0 4 51% 2.98 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,370,000 $1,459,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $337,000 $843,000 $483,000 $6,492,000 $6,492,000 Central Penis Evans Nuevo Ellis Secondary 2.03 0 4 0% 8.12 1 3 0 0 0 0 $9,192,000 $3,979,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $919,000 $2,298,000 $1,317,000 $17,705,000 $17,705,000 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $7,680,000 $0 $0 $768,000 $1,920,000 $768,000 $11,136,000 $11,136,000 Central Penis Evans 1-215 bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Central Perris Goetz Lesser Ethanoc Secondary 2.04 2 4 12% 3.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,073,000 $1,763,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $407,000 $1,018,000 $584,000 $7,845,000 $7.845,000 Central Penis Harlev Knox 1-215 Indian Secondary 1.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Harlev Knox Indian Penis Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Harley Knox Penis Redlands Secondary 0.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Nuevo 1-215 Murrieta Secondary 1.36 4 6 18% 2.23 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,519,000 $12,107,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $252,000 $630,000 $1,463,000 $16,971,000 $16,971,000 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $19,736,000 Central Penis Nuevo Murrieta Dunlap Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,267,000 $981,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $567,000 $325,000 $4,367,000 $4,367,000 Central Perris Nuevo Penis Valley Storm Channel bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis SR-74 (Matthews) 1-215 Ethanac Secondary 1.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $21,835,000 Central Unincorporated Center )Main) 1-215 Mt Vernon Secondary 1.66 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Center(Main) 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $11,912,000 Central Unincorporated Center Wain) BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,800,000 $0 $1,380,000 $3,450,000 $1,380,000 $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Central Unincorporated Ellis Post SR-74 Secondary 2.65 2 4 0% 5.30 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,996,000 $2,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 $1,499,000 $859,000 $11,550,000 $11,550,000 Central Unincorporated Mount Vernon/CETAP Conido Center Pigeon Pass Secondary 0.61 2 4 46% 0.65 3 3 0 0 0 0 $1,537,000 $321,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $154,000 $384,000 $186,000 $2,582,000 $2,582,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo Dunlap Menifee Secondary 2.00 2 4 0% 4.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,536,000 $1,963,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $454,000 $1,134,000 $650,000 $8,737,000 $2,505,000 Central Unincorporated Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 400 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Central Unincorporated Pigeon Pass/CEfAP Condor Hidden Springs Mount Vernon Secondary 3.95 0 2 74% 2.05 3 3 0 0 0 0 $4,827,000 $1,006,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $483,000 $1,207,000 $583,000 $8,106,000 $8,106,000 Central Unincorporated Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis Secondary 0.44 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit Secondary 3.20 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporated Redlands San Timoteo Canyon Locust Secondary 2.54 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona 6th SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 4.50 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Auto Center Railroad SR-91 Secondary 0.48 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Cold- Bedford Canyon 1-15 Secondary 0.15 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Hidden Valley Norco Hills McKinley Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Lincoln Parkndge Ontario Secondary 3.20 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Maqnolia 6th Sherborn Secondary 0.46 4 6 0% 0.92 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,047,000 $5,032,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,000 $262,000 $608,000 $7,054,000 $6,419,000 Northwest Corona Maqnolia Temescal Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 4 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $3,580,000 Northwest Corona Maqnolia Sherborn Rimpau Secondary 0.53 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Maqnolia Rimpau Ontario Secondary 1.17 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Grand Ontario Secondary 0.88 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Ontario Foothill Secondary 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Hidden Valley Parkridge Secondary 0.35 4 6 0% 0.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $789,000 $3,791,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $458,000 $5,314,000 $4,389,000 Northwest Corona Main Parkndge SR-91 Secondary 0.91 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main SR-91 S. Grand Secondary 0.81 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Hidden Valley Promenade Secondary 0.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Promenade SR-91 Secondary 0.33 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley SR-91 Maqnolia Secondary 0.31 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Arington Channel bridge Secondary 0.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 100 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley BNSF railroad crossinq Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario 1-15 El Cerrito Secondary 0.88 4 6 0% 1.76 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,997,000 $9,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $499,000 $1,159,000 $13,451,000 $13,451,000 Northwest Corona Ontario Lincoln Buena Vista Secondary 0.32 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Buena Vista Main Secondary 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Main Kelloqq Secondary 0.78 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Kelloqq Fullerton Secondary 0.32 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Fullerton Rimpau Secondary 0.42 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Rimpau 1-15 Secondary 0.67 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Auto Club Buena Vista Secondary 2.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad BNSF railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,600,000 $0 $2,760,000 $6,900,000 $2,760,000 $40,020,000 $40,020,000 Northwest Corona Railroad Buena Vista Main (at Grand) Secondary 0.58 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona River Corydon Main Secondary 2.28 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Serfas Club SR-91 Green River Secondary 0.96 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TORO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Eastvale Archibald Remington River Secondary 3.40 4 4 82% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,333,000 $233,000 $583,000 $233,000 $3,382,000 $3,382,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Mission Belleqrave Secondary 3.03 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Belleqrave Amberhill Secondary 0.20 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $137,000 $14,000 $34,000 $14,000 $199,000 $199,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Amberhill Limonite Secondary 0.71 2 6 55% 1.28 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,447,000 $626,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $362,000 $207,000 $2,787,000 $2,787,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Limonite Schleisman Secondary 1.00 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $684,000 $68,000 $171,000 $68,000 $991,000 $991,000 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Schleisman Santa Ana River Secondary 0.82 2 6 23% 2.54 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,873,000 $1,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $287,000 $718,000 $412,000 $5,533,000 $3,675,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walters Secondary 0.55 2 4 90% 0.06 1 2 0 0 0 0 $62,000 $299,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $16,000 $36,000 $419,000 $419,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Walters River Secondary 1.41 2 4 0% 2.82 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,192,000 $15,341,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $319,000 $798,000 $1,853,000 $21,503,000 $21,503,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Cucamonqa Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 275 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,640,000 $0 $0 $264,000 $660,000 $264,000 $3,828,000 $3,828,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 Eastvale Gateway Secondary 0.29 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $199,000 $20,000 $50,000 $20,000 $289,000 $289,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Eastvale Gateway Hamner Secondary 0.26 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $18,000 $44,000 $18,000 $255,000 $255,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Hamner Sumner Secondary 1.00 4 6 75% 0.50 1 3 0 0 0 0 $568,000 $246,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $142,000 $81,000 $1,094,000 $1,094,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Sumner Harrison Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $343,000 $34,000 $86,000 $34,000 $497,000 $497,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Harrison Archibald Secondary 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) Secondary 1.15 0 4 78% 1.01 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,146,000 $496,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $287,000 $164,000 $2,208,000 $2,208,000 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Cucamonqa Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600,000 $0 $0 $960,000 $2,400,000 $960,000 $13,920,000 $0 Northwest Eastvale River Hellman Archibald Secondary 0.75 2 4 48% 0.78 1 2 0 0 0 0 $883,000 $4,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,000 $221,000 $513,000 $5,948,000 $5,948,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Armstronq San Bernardino County Valley Secondary 1.53 2 4 34% 2.02 2 3 0 0 0 0 $3,518,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $352,000 $880,000 $451,000 $6,192,000 $6,192,000 Northwest JUrupa Valley Belleqrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Van Buren Secondary 0.29 2 4 63% 0.21 1 3 0 0 0 0 $241,000 $104,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $60,000 $35,000 $464,000 $464,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville Belleqrave Secondary 1.82 0 2 90% 0.36 1 3 0 0 0 0 $412,000 $178,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 $103,000 $59,000 $793,000 $793,000 Northwest JUmpa Valley Etiwanda Philadelphia SR-60 Secondary 1.05 4 6 67% 0.69 1 3 0 0 0 0 $786,000 $340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $197,000 $113,000 $1,515,000 $989,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda SR-60 Limonite Secondary 2.95 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest JUmpa Valley Limonite 1-15 Wineville Secondary 0.47 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Wineville Etiwanda Secondary 0.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest JUmpa Valley Limonite Etiwanda Van Buren Secondary 2.73 2 4 75% 1.37 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,547,000 $670,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $387,000 $222,000 $2,981,000 $2,981,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Van Buren Clay Secondary 0.79 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest JUmpa Valley Limonite Clay Riverview Secondary 2.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Rubidoux Santa Ana River Secondary 1.19 2 4 0% 2.38 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,690,000 $1,164,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $269,000 $673,000 $385,000 $5,181,000 $0 Northwest JUmpa Valley Market Santa Ana River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,000 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600,000 $0 $0 $960,000 $2,400,000 $960,000 $13,920,000 $6,204,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission Milliken SR-60 Secondary 2.10 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest JUrupa Valley Mission SR-60 Santa Ana River Secondary 7.24 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Riverview Limonite Mission Secondary 0.95 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest JUrupa Valley Rubidoux Pine Mission Secondary 2.90 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux SR-60 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $9,051,000 Northwest JUrupa Valley Valley Armstronq Mission Secondary 0.48 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Ist Parkndge Mountain Secondary 0.26 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Ist Mountain Hamner Secondary 0.26 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 2nd River 1-15 Secondary 1.39 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th Hamner California Secondary 1.71 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $3,489,000 Northwest Norco Arlington Crestview Fairhaven Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 1.99 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,254,000 $976,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $564,000 $323,000 $4,342,000 $4,342,000 Northwest Norco California Arlington 6th Secondary 1.05 2 4 5% 2.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,262,000 $10,870,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $566,000 $1,313,000 $15,237,000 $12,525,000 Northwest Norco Corydon River Stir Secondary 1.46 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River bridge Secondary 0.00 2 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 1,200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $23,040,000 $0 $0 $2,304,000 $5,760,000 $2,304,000 $33,408,000 $11,455,000 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River Hidden Valley Secondary 3.25 4 6 0% 6.50 1 2 0 0 0 0 $7,362,000 $35,378,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $736,000 $1,841,000 $4,274,000 $49,591,000 $49,591,000 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley 1-15 Norco Hills Secondary 1.46 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley Hamner 1-15 Secondary 0.19 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Norco Corydon Hamner Secondary 1.20 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco North California Crestview Secondary 0.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco River Archibald Corydon Secondary 1.14 2 4 90% 0.23 1 2 0 0 0 0 $259,000 $1,243,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 $65,000 $150,000 $1,743,000 $1,109,000 Northwest Riverside 14th Market Martin Luther Kinq Secondary 0.89 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Ist Market Main Secondary 0.08 2 2 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd SR-91 1-215 Secondary 1.34 3 4 81% 0.25 1 2 0 0 0 0 $288,000 $1,385,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $72,000 $167,000 $1,941,000 $1,941,000 Northwest Riverside 3rd BNSF railroad crossinq Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $72,800,000 $0 $7,280,000 $18,200,000 $7,280,000 $105,560,000 $30,560,000 Northwest Riverside Adams Arlington SR-91 Secondary 1.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 Lincoln Secondary 0.54 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $3,262,000 Northwest Riverside Arlington Fairhaven La Sierra Secondary 0.61 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Buena Vista Santa Ana River Redwood Secondary 0.30 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Martin Luther Kinq Central Secondary 0.95 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Central Country Club Secondary 0.59 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Country Club Via Vista Secondary 0.93 2 4 12% 1.63 2 3 0 0 0 0 $2,839,000 $799,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $284,000 $710,000 $364,000 $4,996,000 $1,593,000 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Via Vista Alessandro Secondary 0.68 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Chicaqo 1-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.22 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central SR-91 Magnolia Secondary 0.73 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Alessandro SR-91 Secondary 2.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Van Buren Maqnolia Secondary 3.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicaqo Alessandro Spruce Secondary 3.43 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicaqo Spruce Columbia Secondary 0.75 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia Main Iowa Secondary 1.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia 1-215 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $9,050,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa Center 3rd Secondary 2.26 4 6 12% 3.97 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,494,000 $21,596,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,000 $1,124,000 $2,609,000 $30,272,000 $30,272,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa 3rd University Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa University Martin Luther Kinq Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside JFK Trautwein Wood Secondary 0.48 2 4 10% 0.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $976,000 $422,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 $244,000 $140,000 $1,880,000 $1,880,000 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Arlington SR-91 Secondary 3.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Sierra SR-91 Indiana Secondary 0.19 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $133,000 $13,000 $33,000 $13,000 $192,000 $192,000 Northwest Riverside La Sierra Indiana Victoria Secondary 0.78 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $536,000 $54,000 $134,000 $54,000 $778,000 $778,000 Northwest Riverside Lemon INS One way) Mission Inn University Secondary 0.08 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Van Buren Jefferson Secondary 2.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Jefferson Washinqton Secondary 1.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Washinqton Victoria Secondary 1.43 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison SR-91 Victoria Secondary 0.86 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $588,000 $59,000 $147,000 $59,000 $853,000 $853,000 Northwest Riverside Madison BNSF railroad crossinq Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 2 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,800,000 $0 $1,380,000 $3,450,000 $1,380,000 $20,010,000 $20,010,000 Northwest Riverside Maqnolia BNSF Railroad Tyler Secondary 2.70 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Maqnolia BNSF railroad crossinq Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Maqnolia Tyler Harrison Secondary 0.65 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Maqnolia Harrison 14th Secondary 5.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Main Ist San Bernardino County Secondary 2.19 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Market 14th Santa Ana River Secondary 2.59 2 4 76% 1.24 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,409,000 $6,771,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 $352,000 $818,000 $9,491,000 $9,491,000 Northwest Riverside Martin Luther Kinq 141h 1-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.22 4 6 29% 3.15 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,567,000 $17,144,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $357,000 $892,000 $2,071,000 $24,031,000 $24,031,000 Northwest Riverside Mission Inn Redwood Lemon Secondary 0.79 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside RedwOOd(SB One way) Mission Inn University Secondary 0.08 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Troutwein Alessandro Van Buren Secondary 2.19 4 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 Maqnolia Secondary 0.43 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $21,814,000 Northwest Riverside Tyler Maqnolia Hole Secondary 0.27 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Hole Wells Secondary 1.06 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Wells Arlington Secondary 1.35 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University Redwood SR-91 Secondary 0.86 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $593,000 $59,000 $148,000 $59,000 $859,000 $859,000 Northwest Riverside University SR-91 1-215/SR-60 Secondary 2.08 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,425,000 $143,000 $356,000 $143,000 $2,067,000 $2,067,000 Northwest Riverside Victoria Lincoln Arlington Secondary 0.16 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Madison Washinqton Secondary 0.52 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Washinqton Victoria Hermosa Secondary 2.06 2 4 14% 3.54 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,011,000 $19,274,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $401,000 $1,003,000 $2,329,000 $27,018,000 $27,018,000 Northwest Riverside Wood JFK Van Buren Secondary 0.70 2 4 0% 1.40 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,585,000 $686,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $159,000 $396,000 $227,000 $3,053,000 $3,053,000 Northwest Riverside Wood Van Buren Berqamont Secondary 0.11 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Berqamont Kmmeria Secondary 0.39 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Northwest Unincorporated Cantu-Galleano Ranch Hamner Wmeville Secondary 0.94 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Dos Lagos (Weirick) Temescal Canyon I-15 Secondary 0.17 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Cerrito 1-15 Ontano Secondary 0.56 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated El Sobrante Mockingbird Canyon Caialco Secondary 1.05 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Washington Scottsdale Secondary 0.12 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Harley John Scottsdale Caialco Secondary 1.19 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra Victoria El Sobrante Secondary 2.23 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated La Sierra El Sobrante Caialco Secondary 2.36 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Mockingbird Canyon Van Buren El Sobrante Secondary 3.41 2 4 0% 6.82 2 3 0 0 0 0 $11,860,000 $3,340,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,186,000 $2,965,000 $1,520,000 $20,871,000 $20,871,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon El Cerrito Tuscany Secondary 0.65 2 4 20% 1.03 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,800,000 $507,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $450,000 $231,000 $3,168,000 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Tuscany Dos Lagos Secondary 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dos Lagos Lerov Secondary 1.10 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Leroy Dawson Canyon Secondary 1.89 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Dawson Canyon 1-15 Secondary 0.49 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon 1-15 Park Canyon Secondary 2.02 2 4 10% 3.63 3 3 0 0 0 0 $8,533,000 $1,779,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $853,000 $2,133,000 $1,031,000 $14,329,000 $14,329,000 Northwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail Secondary 2.55 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporated Washington Hermosa Hal John Secondary 3.96 2 4 26% 5.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,638,000 $2,874,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $664,000 $1,660,000 $951,000 $12,787,000 $12,787,000 Northwest Unincorporated Wood Kromeria Caialco Secondary 2.99 2 4 4% 5.75 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,509,000 $2.817,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $651,000 $1,627,000 $933,000 $12,537,000 $12,537,000 Pass Banning 8th Wilson 1-10 Secondary 0.54 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Lincoln Sunset SR-243 Secondary 2.01 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 1-10 8th Secondary 1.70 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 8t1, Highland Springs Secondary 3.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning SR-243 1-10 Wesley Secondary 0.62 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Hiqhland Home Sunset Secondary 1.00 0 4 0% 4.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,528,000 $21,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,000 $1,132,000 $2,629,000 $30,502,000 $30,502,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $5,760,000 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $576,000 $8,352,000 $8,352,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Montgomery Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 0 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $384,000 $960,000 $384,000 $5,568,000 $5,568,000 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Springs Highland Home Secondary 1.33 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset Ramsey Lincoln Secondary 0.28 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Home 81h Secondary 2.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home Secondary 1.01 4 4 100% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Ist Viele Pennsylvania Secondary 1.28 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Ist Pennsylvania Highland Springs Secondary 1.10 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 6th 1-10 Highland Springs Secondary 2.24 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Desert Lawn Champions Oak Valley (STC) Secondary 0.99 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley 1141h) Highland Springs Pennsylvania Secondary 1.13 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley 114th) Pennsylvania Oak View Secondary 1.40 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley 1141h) Oak View 1-10 Secondary 0.65 4 4 50% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley 114th) 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $62,401,000 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley ISTC) UP Railroad Tukwet Canyon Secondary 2.94 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley ISTCI Tukwet Canvon 1-10 Secondary 2.58 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 61h 1st Secondary 0.53 2 4 18% 0.86 1 2 0 0 0 0 $978,000 $4,699,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000 $245,000 $568,000 $6,588,000 $6,588,000 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Bryant County Line Avenue L Secondary 0.38 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa County Line 1-10 Secondary 0.80 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Pass Calimesa County Line 7th Bryant Secondary 1.83 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Pass Calimesa Desert Lawn Palmer Champions Secondary 1.42 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Avenue L Condit Secondary 1.86 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Condit Roberts Secondary 0.85 2 4 0% 1.70 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,926,000 $9,253,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $193,000 $482,000 $1,118,000 $12,972,000 $12,972,000 Pass Calimesa Singleton 1-10 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $0 Pass Calimesa Tukwet Canyon Roberti Rd Palmer Secondary 0.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County Secondary 2.81 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon San Bernardino County UP Railroad Secondary 5.65 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporated San Timoteo Canyon UP Railroad railroad crossing Secondary 0.00 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 1 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,400,000 $0 $3,640,000 $9,100,000 $3,640,000 $52,780,000 $52,780,000 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Acacia Menlo Secondary 0.98 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Domeniqoni Stetson Secondary 1.09 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson RR Crossing Acacia Secondary 0.42 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Stetson RR Crossing Secondary 0.58 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Menlo Esplanade Secondary 1.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Warren Cawston Secondary 1.02 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Columbia Ramona Secondary 2.58 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74/SR-79 (Florida) Cawston Columbia Secondary 4.03 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Domeniqoni Chambers Secondary 1.31 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Chambers Stetson Secondary 0.51 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Florida Esplanade Secondary 1.74 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Stetson Florida Secondary 1.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Cal State Secondary 2.52 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Warren Cawston Secondary 1.00 2 4 0% 2.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,262,000 $979,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $566,000 $324,000 $4,357,000 $4,357,000 San Jacinto Hemet Wanen Esplanade Domeniqoni Secondary 5.02 2 4 9% 9.14 1 3 0 0 0 0 $10,345,000 $4,478,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,035,000 $2,586,000 $1,482,000 $19,926,000 $19,926,000 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Sall Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade Mountain State Secondary 2.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade State Warren Secondary 3.53 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Sanderson Ramona Esplanade Secondary 3.55 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (North Ramona) State San Jacinto Secondary 1.02 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) North Ramona Blvd 7th Secondary 0.25 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) 71h SR-74 Secondary 2.25 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Ramona Esplanade Secondary 1.99 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Gilman Springs Quandt Ranch Secondary 0.76 2 4 0% 1.52 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,722,000 $745,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $172,000 $431,000 $247,000 $3,317,000 $3,317,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto State San Jacinto River bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 500 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Quandt Ranch Ramona Secondary 0.70 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Wanen Ramona Esplanade Secondary 3.47 2 4 11% 6.18 1 3 0 0 0 0 $6,993,000 $3,027,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $699,000 $1,748,000 $1,002,000 $13,469,000 $13,469,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Sanderson State Secondary 2.54 2 4 0% 5.09 1 3 0 0 0 0 $5,761,000 $2,494,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $576,000 $1,440,000 $826,000 $11,097,000 $11,097,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated Gilman Springs Massacre Canyon Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 100 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 $0 $0 $96,000 $240,000 $96,000 $1,392,000 $1,392,000 San Jacinto Unincorporated SR-79 (Winchester) SR-74 )Florida) Domeniqoni Secondary 3.23 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-1 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIST CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO NETWORK MILES EXISTINGLN FUTURELN %COMPLETE INCREASELN MILES TOPO LANDUSE INTERCHG BRIDGE RRXING ITS NEWLNCOST ROWCOST INTCHGCOST BRDGCOST RRXCOST ITSCOST PLNG ENG CONTIG TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARE Southwest Lake Elsinore Corydon Mission Grand Secondary 1.53 2 4 50% 1.53 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,732,000 $750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $173,000 $433,000 $248,000 $3,336,000 $3,336,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Diamond Mission I-15 Secondary 0.24 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Franklin (integral to Railroad C 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $32,698,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Lincoln TO Secondary 1.29 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand To SR-74 (Riverside) Secondary 0.86 2 4 6% 1.61 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,824,000 $789,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $182,000 $456,000 $261,000 $3,512,000 $3,512,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake-15 Lincoln Secondary 3.25 2 4 28% 4.68 2 2 0 0 0 0 $8,144,000 $25,462,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $814,000 $2,036,000 $3,361,000 $39,817,000 $32,726,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 2 2 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32.698,000 $15.771.000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake Temescal Wash bridge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 2 0 180 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,728,000 $0 $0 $173,000 $432,000 $173,000 $2,506,000 $1,150,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Mission Railroad Canyon Bundy Canyon Secondary 2.39 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols-15 Lake Secondary 1.80 2 4 0% 3.60 1 3 0 0 0 0 $4,075,000 $1,764,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $408,000 $1,019,000 $584,000 $7,850,000 $7,850,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols Temescal Wash brdge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 300 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $288,000 $720,000 $288,000 $4,176,000 $4,176,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 2 0 0 0 $0 $0 $43,490,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,349,000 $10,873,000 $4,349,000 $63,061,000 $63,061,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Collier/Riverside)-15 Lakeshore Secondary 2.15 2 4 26% 3.19 1 2 0 0 0 0 $3,608,000 $17,337,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $361,000 $902,000 $2,095,000 $24,303,000 $24,303,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-741Grandl Riverside SR-74(Ortega) Secondary 0.64 2 4 0% 1.28 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,445,000 $6,943,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000 $361,000 $839,000 $9,733,000 $3,691,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-741Riverside) Lakeshore Grand Secondary 1.74 2 4 24% 2.65 1 2 0 0 0 0 $2,995,000 $14,392,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $749,000 $1,739,000 $20,175,000 $20,175,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon 1-15 Lake Secondary 1.21 2 4 0% 2.42 2 3 0 0 0 0 $4,211,000 $1,186,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $421,000 $1,053,000 $540,000 $7,411,000 $7,411,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash brdge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 250 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $0 $0 $240,000 $600,000 $240,000 $3,480,000 $3,480,000 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks Jefferson 1-15 Secondary 0.32 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta California Oaks 1-15 Jackson Secondary 0.50 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta California Oaks Jackson Clinton Keith Secondary 1.76 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta Jackson Whitewood Ynez Secondary 0.53 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta Jefferson Palomar Nutmeg Secondary 1.02 0 2 75% 0.51 2 3 0 0 0 0 $887,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,000 $222,000 $114,000 $1,562,000 $1,562,000 Southwest Munieta Jeff non Nutmeq Munieta Hot Springs Secondary 2.37 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta Jefferson Munieta Hof Springs Cherry Secondary 2.26 4 6 11% 4.02 1 2 0 0 0 0 $4,548,000 $21,854,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $455,000 $1,137,000 $2,640,000 $30,634,000 $30,634,000 Southwest Munieta Keller I-215 Whitewood Backbone 0.75 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta Keller -215 interchange Backbone 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Munieta Los Alamos Jefferson 1-215 Secondary 1.77 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Munieta Hot Springs Jefferson 1-215 Secondary 1.16 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs 1-215 Margarita Secondary 1.45 6 6 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Murrieta Hot Springs Margarita SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 1.01 4 6 8% 1.86 1 3 0 0 0 0 $2,106,000 $911,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $527,000 $302,000 $4,057,000 $3,899,000 Southwest Murrieta Nutmeq Jefferson Clinton Keith Secondary 1.97 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Clinton Keith Los Alamos Secondary 2.01 3 4 56% 0.88 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,539,000 $433,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $154,000 $385,000 $197,000 $2,708,000 $2,708,000 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Los Alamos Munieta Hot Springs Secondary 1.93 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Murrieta Whitewood Munieta Hof Springs Jackson Secondary 0.80 0 2 66% 0.54 2 2 0 0 0 0 $947,000 $2,959,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $237,000 $391,000 $4,629,000 $4,629,000 Southwest Murrieta Ynez Jackson SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 1.22 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Munieta Hof Springs Calle Chapos Secondary 0.82 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $563,000 $56,000 $141,000 $56,000 $816,000 $816,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Calle Chapos La Serena Secondary 0.70 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $48,000 $120,000 $48,000 $696,000 $696,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage La Serena Rancho California Secondary 0.91 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $624,000 $62,000 $156,000 $62,000 $904,000 $904,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Rancho California Pauba Secondary 0.85 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $584,000 $58,000 $146,000 $58,000 $846,000 $846,000 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Pauba SR-791Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 1.69 2 4 93% 0.24 2 3 0 0 0 0 $412,000 $116,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,000 $103,000 $53,000 $725,000 $725,000 Southwest Temecula Jefferson Cherry Rancho California Secondary 2.29 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,575,000 $158,000 $394,000 $158,000 $2,285,000 $2,285,000 Southwest Temecula Margarita Munieta Hof Springs SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 7.68 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,272,000 $527,000 $1,318,000 $527,000 $7,644,000 $7,644,000 Southwest Temecula Old Town Front Rancho California 1-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Secondary 1.45 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanqa Pkwy SR-79 (Temecula Pkwv) Via Gilberto Secondary 1.32 6 6 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanqa Pkwy Via Gilberto Pechanqa Pkwy Secondary 1.44 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Jefferson Margarita Secondary 1.89 4 6 53% 1.78 1 1 0 0 0 0 $2,015,000 $13,938,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $202,000 $504,000 $1,595,000 $18,254,000 $18,181,000 Southwest Temecula Rancho California 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 1 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Margarita Butterfield Stage Secondary 1.96 4 4 0% 0.00 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) 1-15 Pechanqa Pkwy Secondary 0.90 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 liemecula Pkwv) Pechanqa Pkwv Butterfield Stage Secondary 3.08 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,114,000 $211,000 $529,000 $211,000 $3,065,000 $3,065,000 Southwest Unincorporated Bnqqs Scott SR-79 (Winchester) Secondary 3.39 2 4 56% 2.98 1 3 0 0 0 0 $3,379,000 $1,463,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $338,000 $845,000 $484,000 $6,509,000 $6,509,000 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage Tucalota Creek bridge Secondary 0.00 4 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 200 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Butterfield Stage (Pourroy) Auld Munieta Hot Spnngs Secondary 2.27 0 4 17% 7.54 2 3 0 0 0 0 $13,113,000 $3,693,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,311,000 $3,278,000 $1,681,000 $23,076,000 $23,076,000 Southwest Unincorporated Grand Ortega Corydon Secondary 4.96 2 4 10% 8.92 1 2 0 0 0 0 $10,098,000 $48,529,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,010,000 $2,525,000 $5,863,000 $68,025,000 $68,025,000 Southwest Unincorporated Horsethief Canyon Temescal Canyon 1-15 Secondary 0.17 2 2 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Indian Truck Trail Temescal Canyon 1-15 Secondary 0.18 6 6 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Murrieta Hot Sprngs SR-79 (Winchester) Pourroy Secondary 1.75 4 4 0% 0.00 1 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pala Pechanqa San Diego County Secondary 1.39 2 2 0% 0.00 2 3 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporated Pourroy SR-79 (Winchester) Auld Secondary 2.28 2 4 84% 0.73 2 3 0 0 0 0 $1,270,000 $358,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,000 $318,000 $163,000 $2,236,000 $2,236,000 Southwest Unincorporated Rancho California Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks Secondary 4.26 2 4 0% 8.52 1 1 0 0 0 0 $9,645,000 $66,712,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $965,000 $2,411,000 $7,636,000 $87,369,000 $87,369,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Horsethief Canyon Wash brdge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 240 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $2,304,000 $0 $0 $230,000 $576,000 $230,000 $3,340,000 $3,340,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Truck Trail 1-15 Secondary 2.57 2 4 0% 5.14 2 3 0 0 0 0 $8,944,000 $2,519,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $894,000 $2,236,000 $1,146,000 $15,739,000 $15,739,000 Southwest Unincorporated Temescal Canyon Indian Wash brdge Secondary 0.00 2 4 0% 0.00 2 3 0 105 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $1,008,000 $0 $0 $101,000 $252,000 $101,000 $1,462,000 $1,462,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundv Canyon Mission 1-15 Secondary 0.94 2 4 32% 1.27 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,441,000 $6,923,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $360,000 $836,000 $9,704,000 $9,704,000 Southwest Wildomar Grand Corydon Wildomar Trail Secondary 2.02 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Mission Bundy Canyon Palomar Secondary 0.84 4 4 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Clinton Keith Washington Secondary 0.74 2 4 0% 1.48 1 3 0 0 0 0 $1,675,000 $725,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,000 $419,000 $240,000 $3,227,000 $3,227,000 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Mission Clinton Keith Secondary 2.79 2 4 21% 4.41 2 3 0 0 0 0 $7,667,000 $2,159,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $767,000 $1,917,000 $983,000 $13,493,000 $13,493,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail 1-15 Baxter Secondary 0.29 2 4 0% 0.59 1 3 0 0 0 0 $665,000 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,000 $166,000 $95,000 $1,281,000 $1,281,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail 1-15 interchange Secondary 0.00 0 0 0% 0.00 1 3 3 0 0 0 $0 $0 $22,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,255,000 $5,638,000 $2,255,000 $32,698,000 $27,858,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Baxter Palomar Secondary 0.74 2 4 0% 1.48 1 2 0 0 0 0 $1,680,000 $8,073,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,000 $420,000 $975,000 $11,316,000 $11,316,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Palomar Grand Secondary 0.51 2 2 0% 0.00 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal Secondary 469.28 240.56 22 8,650 6 26.75 $303,507,000 $590,248,000 $621,740,000 $101,280,000 $237,200,000 $18,358,000 $128,215,000 $320,544,000 $187,237,000 $2,508,329,000 $1,913,028,000 Totafs Network 739.22 558.58 33 17,485 9 33.89 $ 741,859,000 $1,272,869,000 $ 1,057,070,000 $ 176,256,000 $ 374,000,000 $ 23,259,000 $ 237,252,000 $ 593,150,000 $ 364,535,000 $ 4,840,250,000 $ 3,874,735,000 Transit $ 217,870,000 $ 154,831,000 Adminishalion $ 161,183,000 $ 161,183.000 MSHCP $ 64,606,000 $ 53,859,000 TOTAL � $ 4,244,608,000 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Central Menifee Ethanac Goetz Murrieta $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.27 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee E}hanac Mumeta I-215 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 029 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee E}hanac I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.62 1.21 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee E}hanac Sherman Matthews $2,674,000 $2,674,000 $69,000 0% 0% 0.32 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $69,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee E}hanac BNSF San Jacinto Branch railroad crossing $105,560,000 $105,560,000 $3,640,000 0% 0% 0.32 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee SR-74(Pinacate) Simpson $1,307,000 $1,307,000 $34,000 11% 11% 0.70 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Sal} Creek bridge $4,384,000 $4,384,000 $151,000 01% 0% 0.36 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Simpson Aldergate $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.39 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Aldergate Newport $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.45 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Newport Holland $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Holland Garbani $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.41 0.54 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee Garbani Scott $4,353,000 $4,353,000 $113,000 0% 0% 0.64 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Menifee/Whitewood Scot} Muirieta City Limit $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.44 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Goetz Munieta $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.59 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport m Mueta 1-215 $1,130,000 $1,130,000 $29,000 27% 27% 0.84 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport -215 Menifee $0 $0 $0s=tee==M= 1.e,1-21sss o�xoma mom=roo= 36% 36% 0.93 1.08 85% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Cen}rol Menifee Newport Menifee Lindenberger $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.66 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Newport Lindenberger SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scot} I-215 Briggs $8,635,000 $8,635,000 $224,000 s=ee==se-2iso�xamo aye Amei�e 51%5% 0.45 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $224,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scott -215 interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 1.17 1.54 57% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scot} Sunset Murrieta $4,388,000 $4,388,000 $114,000 0% 0% 0.94 1.32 91% $0 $0 $0 $114,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Scot} Mumeta I-215 $16,949,000 $12,949,000 $336,000 01% 0% 0.72 1.03 $0 $4,000,000 $0 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee SR-74 Matthews Briggs $8,254,000 $8,254,000 $214,000 01% 0% 0.72 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $214,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro I-215 Penis $13,420,000 $13,420,000 $100,000 0% 0% 0.61 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Perris Nason $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.55 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Nason Moreno Beach $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.22 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Alessandro Moreno Beach Gilman Springs $18,019,000 $18,019,000 $468,000 0% 0% 0.24 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $468,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Springs SR-60 Alessandro $7,291,000 $7,291,000 $189,000 0% 0% 0.65 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $189,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Gilman Sprngs SR-60 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.60 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Reche Vista Ironwood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.34 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Ironwood Sunnymead $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.74 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $11,192,000 $0 01% 0% 2.03 2.62 34% $21,506,000 $0 $21,506,000 $0 $0 $0 $21,506,000 Central Moreno Valley Perris Sunnymead Cactus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.62 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Perris Cactus Harley Knox $0 $0 $O 18% 18% 0.69 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Vista Country Heacock $7,486,000 $3,799,000 $39,000 100% 100% 0.92 0.95 51% $3,687,000 $0 $3,687,000 $77,000 $38,000 $38,000 $3,725,000 Central Perris 11 th/Case Perris Goetz $4,582,000 $4,582,000 $34,000 01% 0% 0.76 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $34,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Pertis Case Goetz I-215 $20,876,000 $20,876,000 $155,000 40% 40% 0.80 1.18 $0 $0 $0 $155,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Case San Jacinto River bridge $1,740,000 $1,235,000 $43,000 01% 0% 1.18 1.88 71% $505,000 $0 $505,000 $60,000 $0 $0 $505,000 Central Penis E}hanac Keystone Goetz $6,056,000 $6,056,000 $157,000 01% 0% 0.07 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $157,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Pertis E}hanac San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 01% 0% 0.07 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis E}hanac I-215 Sheman $5,316,000 $5,316,000 $39,000 01% 0% 0.53 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $39,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Goetz Case Ethanac $1,507,000 $999,000 $26,000 100% 100% 1.06 1.38 66% $508,000 $0 $508,000 $39,000 $13,000 $13,000 $521,000 Central Penis Goetz San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $3,398,000 $117,000 01% 0% 1.13 1.50 61% $2,170,000 $0 $2,170,000 $192,000 $0 $0 $2,170,000 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) I-215 Penis $15,655,000 $15,655,000 $116,000 01% 0% 0.05 0.21 $0 $0 $0 $116,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.46 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) Perris Evans $22,985,000 $22,985,000 $171,000 01% 0% 0.03 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $171,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Mid -County (Placentia) Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 01% 0% 0.03 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Pertis Perris Harley Knox Ramona $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.86 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Perris Ramona Citrus $7,063,000 $7,063,000 $183,000 s=re=�eamo�a aye oawe�. a�a eroe,a�awa�=, 39% 39% 0.83 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $183,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Perris Citrus Nuevo $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.66 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Perris Nuevo 11th $6,927,000 $6,927,000 $51,000 0% 0% 0.72 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $51,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Perris I-215 overcrossinq bridge $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.78 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Ramona I-215 Penis $5,039,000 $5,039,000 $37,000 26% 26% 0.77 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Penis Ramona I-215 interchange $32,698,000 $7,725,000 $0 01% 0% 1.80 2.08 24% $24,973,000 $0 $24,973,000 $0 $0 $0 $24,973,000 Central Penis Ramona Perris Evans $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.67 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Pertis Ramona Evans Mid -County (2,800 N E of Rider) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 f4th) Ellis I-215 $0 $0 $0 22% 22% 0.78 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec E}hanac SR-74 Keystone $4,666,000 $4,666,000 $121,000 01% 0% 0.04 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $121,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Gilman Springs Alessandro Bridge Road $30,601,000 $30,601,000 $869,000 41% 41% 0.87 1.43 $0 $0 $0 $869,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Menifee Nuevo SR-74 (Pinacate) $16,684,000 $16,684,000 $433,000 0% 0% 0.69 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $433,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Mid -County Evans Ramona (2,800 N E of Rider) $12,156,000 $12,156,000 $362,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $362,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Mid -County (Ramona) Ramona (2,800 ft E of Rider) Pico Avenue $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.37 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Mid -County (Ramona) Pico Avenue Bridge Road $47,769,000 $47,769,000 $1,240,000 01% 0% 0.82 1.43 $0 $0 $0 $1,240,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Mid -County (Ramona) San Jacinto River bridge $36,192,000 $36,192,000 $1,248,000 0% 0% 0.78 1.33 $0 $0 $0 $1,248,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Reche Canyon San Bemardino County Reche Vista $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.84 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Reche Vista Reche Canyon Country $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.81 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Scot} Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.12 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec SR-74 E}hanac Ellis $0 $0 $0 34% 34% 0.87 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Calalco I-15 Temescal Canyon $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.47 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Calalco I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 1.59 2.08 42% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Paseo Grande Lincoln $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.45 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Wardlow Wash bridge $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.47 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Lincoln California $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.30 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Foothill Califonna I-15 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.29 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River SR-91 Dominguez Ranch $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.53 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Dominguez Ranch Palisades $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.53 0.60 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Green River Palisades Paseo Grande $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.66 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman San Bemardino County 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek $648,000 $648,000 $0 0% 0% 0.65 1.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman Cucamonga Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 1.27 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman 600' e/o Cucamonga Creek Harrison $866,000 $866,000 $0 0% 0% 0.69 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman Harrison Sumner $488,000 $488,000 $0 s=tee==soi=ew ea=ewm=e, 18% 18% 0.62 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman Sumner Scholar $7,625,000 $7,625,000 $57,000 0% 0% 0.85 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman Scholar AS}reef $119,000 $119,000 $1,000 0% 0% 0.50 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eas}vale Schleisman AStreet Hamner $209,000 $209,000 $2,000 0% 0% 0.50 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren SR-60 Bellegrave $23,928,000 $10,461,000 $78,000 100% 100% 1.02 1.10 44% $13,467,000 $0 $13,467,000 $178,000 $100,000 $100,000 $13,567,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Van Buren Belleqrave Santa Ana River $60,900,000 $0 $O 59% 59% 1.03 1.13 44% $19,851,000 $60,900,000 $0 $452,000 $147,000 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Alessandro Arington Trautwein $2,410,000 $2,410,000 $0 73% 73% 1.03 1.16 48% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arington La Siena Magnolia $0 $0 $O 13% 13% 0.68 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Arington Magnolia Alessandro $46,465,000 $46,465,000 $475,000 s=e a==vinana a=a Ai..... 36% 36% 0.80 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Santa Ana River SR-91 $5,230,000 $4,392,000 $33,000 s=e a==eama A-1crone.. 58% 58% 0.94 1.05 72% $838,000 $0 $838,000 $39,000 $6,000 $6,000 $844,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren SR-91 Mockingbird Canyon $39,493,000 $21,292,000 $158,000 95% 95% 1.00 1.10 51% $18,201,000 $0 $18,201,000 $293,000 $135,000 $135,000 $18,336,000 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Wood Trautwein $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.79 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Van Buren Trautwein Orange Terrace $7,574,000 $7,574,000 $56,000 01% 0% 0.69 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $56,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Alessandro Trautwein Vista Grande $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.79 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Alessandro Vista Grande I-215 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.85 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco El Sobrante Harley John $10,580,000 $9,817,000 $279,000 40% 20% 0.95 1.04 64% $763,000 $0 $763,000 $301,000 $22,000 $22,000 $785,000 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco Harley John Harvil $166,492,000 $166,492,000 $1,236,000 63% 31% 0.87 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $1,236,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco Harvil I-215 $1,238,000 $1,238,000 $32,000 01% 0% 0.78 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco Temescal Canyon La Sierra $49,596,000 $35,953,000 $1,071,000 100% 50% 1.06 1.19 45% $13,643,000 $0 $13,643,000 $1,477,000 $406,000 $406,000 $14,049,000 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco Temescal Wash bridge $4,872,000 $1,907,000 $66,000 01% 0% 1.13 1.27 39% $2,965,000 $0 $2,965,000 $168,000 $0 $0 $2,965,000 Northwest Unincorporatec Calalco La Siena El Sobrante $96,453,000 $96,453,000 $2,872,000 01% 0% 0.78 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $2,872,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Van Buren Mockingbird Canyon Wood $67,429,000 $67,429,000 $501,000 47% 47% 0.89 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $501,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Van Buren Orange Terrace I-215 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.71 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Pass Banning Highland Springs Wilson (8th) Sun Lakes $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.46 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $32,516,000 $0 01% 0% 1.16 1.43 52% $30,545,000 $14,698,000 $15,847,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,847,000 Pass Banning Highland Springs Oak Valley (14th) Wilson (Bth) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.29 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Highland Springs Cherry Valley Oak Valley 114th) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.28 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 Morongo Trail (Apache Trail) $50,110,000 $50,110,000 $372,000 01% 0% 0.04 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $372,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 01% 0% 0.73 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South San Gorgonio bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 01% 0% 0.26 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning I-10 Bypass South UP/Hargrave railroad crossinq $52,780,000 $52,780,000 $1,820,000 01% 0% 0.26 0.31 $0 $0 $0 $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.31 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Oak Valley (San Timoteo Car SR-60 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 $29,000 01% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 interchange $63,061,000 $29,561,000 $0 01% 0% 0.39 0.84 $0 $33,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero UP railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 $1,380,000 01% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $1,380,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero Noble Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.01 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Potrero SR-60 4th $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.01 0.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 California $0 $0 $0 100% 100% 1.05 1.18 46% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont SR-79 (Beaumont) I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $7,408,000 $0 01% 0% 2.20 2.37 12% $55,653,000 $0 $55,653,000 $0 $0 $0 $55,653,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $59,773,000 $0 01% 0% 0.93 1.51 95% $3,288,000 $443,000 $2,845,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,845,000 Pass Calimesa Cherry Valley Roberts St Roberts Rd $3,053,000 $3,053,000 $79,000 01% 0% 0.54 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec Cherry Valley Bellflower Noble $6,411,000 $6,411,000 $166,000 01% 0% 0.08 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $166,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec Cherry Valley Highland Springs Bellflower $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.03 0.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec Cherry Valley Noble Roberts St $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.41 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec Cherry Valley San Timoteo Wash bridge $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.26 0.41 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec SR-79 (Lamb Canyon) California Gilman Springs $0 $0 $0 100% 100% 1.21 1.43 42% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Warren Sanderson $7,726,000 $7,726,000 $201,000 01% 0% 0.82 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Domenigoni Sanderson State $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.41 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 Winchester Warren $35,208,000 $35,208,000 $261,000 25% 25% 0.83 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $261,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Warren Sanderson $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.57 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Mid -County (Ramona) Sanderson/SR-79 (Hemet Bypi interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.61 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Sanderson State $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.48 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona State Main $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.58 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Main Cedar $31,518,000 $26,928,000 $200,000 68% 34% 0.93 0.97 57% $4,590,000 $0 $4,590,000 $234,000 $34,000 $34,000 $4,624,000 San Jacinto San Jacinto Ramona Cedar SR-74 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.29 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Domenigoni SR-79 (Winchester) Warren $13,508,000 $13,508,000 $351,000 01% 0% 0.88 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $351,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Domenigoni San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 01% 0% 0.88 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Gilman Springs Bridge Sanderson $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Mid -County (Ramona) Bridge Warren $9,221,000 $9,221,000 $239,000 01% 0% 0.78 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $239,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-74 Briggs SR-79 (Winchester) $15,417,000 $15,417,000 $400,000 14% 14% 0.63 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) SR-74 (Florida) Domeniqoni $13,901,000 $13,901,000 $361,000 01% 0% 0.62 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $361,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) San Diego Aqueduct bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 01% 0% 0.62 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Hemet Bypass) Domenigoni Winchester $6,542,000 $6,542,000 $170,000 01% 0% 0.59 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $170,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (San Jacinto Bypass) Mid -County (Ramona) SR-74 (Florida) $56,690,000 $56,690,000 $1,472,000 01% 0% 0.55 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $1,472,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79(Sanderson) Gilman Springs Ramona $6,899,000 $2,555,000 $66,000 100% 100% 1.18 1.34 37% $4,344,000 $0 $4,344,000 $179,000 $113,000 $113,000 $4,457,000 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Sanderson) San Jacinto River bridge $19,488,000 $7,651,000 $264,000 01% 0% 1.21 1.41 39% $11,837,000 $0 $11,837,000 $672,000 $0 $0 $11,837,000 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Winchester) Domenigoni Keller $65,022,000 $65,022,000 $483,000 01% 0% 0.55 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $483,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Goetz Railroad Canyon Newport $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.35 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Canyon Lake Railroad Canyon Canyon Hills Goetz $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.71 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 Canyon Hills $0 $0 $0 2% 2% 0.86 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Railroad Canyon I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 2.48 3.04 26% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 I-15 interchange $63,061,000 $24,162,000 $0 0% 0% 1.60 2.03 38% $38,899,000 $0 $38,899,000 $0 $0 $0 $38,899,000 Southwest Mumeta Clinton Keith Copper Craft Toulon $0 $0 $0 35% 35% 0.76 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Clinton Keith Toulon I-215 $2,076,000 $2,076,000 $54,000 52% 52% 0.88 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Clinton Keith I-215 Whitewood $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta French Valley (Date) Mumeta Hot Springs Winchester Creek $7,321,000 $7,321,000 $54,000 0% 0% 0.77 1.21 $0 $0 $0 $54,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta French Valley (Date) Winchester Creek Margarita $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.04 0.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whitewood Menifee City Limit Keller $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.39 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whitewood Keller Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.54 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Jefferson Diaz $3,929,000 $3,929,000 $29,000 01% 0% 0.00 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Cherry) Mumeta Creek bridge $5,846,000 $5,846,000 $202,000 01% 0% 0.00 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $202,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Margarita Ynez $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.20 0.34 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) Ynez Jefferson $5,010,000 $5,010,000 $37,000 01% 0% 0.07 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $37,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula French Valley (Date) I-15 interchange $122,076,000 $122,076,000 $0 01% 0% 0.19 0.29 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79(Winchester) Mumeta Hot Springs Jefferson $2,697,000 $2,697,000 $0 84% 84% 0.96 1.24 81% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Winchester) I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 1.58 1.80 24% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Diaz) Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 $17,000 01% 0% 0.18 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Mor Rancho California SR-79 (Front) $23,629,000 $23,629,000 $296,000 01% 0% 0.01 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $296,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Mor I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 2.30 3.07 36% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Western Bypass (Vincent Mor Murrieta Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 01% 0% 0.01 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Benton SR-79 Eastern Bypass $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.26 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Clinton Keith Whitewood SR-79 $5,539,000 $5,539,000 $144,000 01% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Clinton Keith Warm Springs Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec SR-74 I-15 Ethanac $27,699,000 $26,347,000 $749,000 64% 64% 0.93 1.23 92% $1,352,000 $0 $1,352,000 $787,000 $38,000 $38,000 $1,390,000 Southwest Unincorporatec SR-79 (Winchester) Keller Thompson $34,213,000 $34,213,000 $254,000 01% 0% 0.56 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $254,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec SR-79 (Winchester) Thompson La Alba $27,699,000 $27,699,000 $206,000 25% 25% 0.82 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $206,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec SR-79(Winchester) La Alba Hunter $7,854,000 $3,042,000 $22,000 100% 100% 1.10 1.22 39% $4,812,000 $0 $4,812,000 $58,000 $36,000 $36,000 $4,848,000 Southwest Unincorporatec SR-79 (Winchester) Hunter Munieta Hot Springs $595,000 $442,000 $11,000 75% 75% 0.95 1.04 66% $153,000 $0 $153,000 $15,000 $4,000 $4,000 $157,000 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 Monte Vista $1,362,000 $1,362,000 $39,000 75% 75% 0.84 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $39,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Monte Vista Sunset $24,818,000 $24,818,000 $739,000 37% 37% 0.89 1.18 $0 $0 $0 $739,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $24,613,000 $0 01% 0% 1.12 1.77 75% $8,085,000 $0 $8,085,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,085,000 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith Palomar I-15 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.69 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Clinton Keith I-15 Copper Craft $5,030,000 $0 $0 60% 60% 0.89 1.01 $0 $5,030,000 $0 $143,000 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $2,331,921,000 $1,961,707,000 $30,262,000 10.8% $286,635,000 $118,571,000 $251,643,000 $32,508,000 $1,092,000 945,000 252,588,000 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Central Menifee Bnqqs Newport Scott $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.18 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs SR-74 (Pinacate) Simpson $2,991,000 $2,991,000 $78,000 0% 0% 0.05 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $78,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs Simpson Old Newport $5,430,000 $5,430,000 $141,000 01/. 0% 0.35 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $141,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Briggs Salt Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 0% 0% 0.41 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Garbani I-215 interchange $63,061,000 $42,483,000 $0 0% 0% 1.21 1.85 67% $20,578,000 $0 $20,578,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,578,000 Central Menifee Goetz Juanita Lesser Lane $11,378,000 $11,378,000 $295,000 0% 0% 0.70 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Goetz Newport Juanita $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Mumeto Bradley $15,708,000 $15,708,000 $117,000 0% 0% 0.52 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $117,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Bradley Haun $11,439,000 $11,439,000 $85,000 0% 0% 0.62 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Houn Antelope $9,456,000 $9,456,000 $70,000 0% 0% 0.74 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland I-215 overcrossing bridge $9,744,000 $9,744,000 $336,000 0% 0% 0.76 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $336,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Holland Antelope Menifee $3,844,000 $3,844,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.17 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall I-215 Aspel $5,354,000 $5,354,000 $139,000 0% 0% 0.34 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $139,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.58 2.02 39% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee McCall Aspel Menifee $2,288,000 $2,288,000 $59,000 0% 0% 0.38 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $59,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Mumeta Ethanac McCall $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Mumeta McCall Newport $7,967,000 $7,967,000 $207,000 0% 0% 0.60 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $207,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Menifee Mumeta Newport Bundy Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 Heacock $5,617,000 $5,617,000 $42,000 7% 7% 0.66 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Cactus I-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.22 1.43 40% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 1.03 1.21 60% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Day SR-60 Eucalyptus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.45 0.58 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus 1-215 Towngate $8,843,000 $8,843,000 $66,000 0% 0% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $66,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Towngate Frederick $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Frederick Heacock $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Heacock Kitching $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.53 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Kitching Moreno Beach $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.19 0.28 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Eucalyptus Moreno Beach Theodore $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.01 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Frederick SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 $0 5% 5% 0.42 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Cactus San Michele $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.56 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock Reche Vista Cactus $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Heacock San Michele Harley Knox $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.11 0.22 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood SR-60 Day $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.82 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Ironwood Day Heacock $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle Alessandro John F Kennedy $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.68 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Lasselle John F Kennedy Oleander $0 $0 $0 13% 13% 0.72 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach Reche Canyon SR-60 $18,797,000 $18,797,000 $140,000 5% 5% 0.32 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Moreno Beach SR-60 overcrossinq bridge $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.95 1.27 87% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Nason SR-60 Alessandro $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.66 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass Ironwood SR-60 $0 $0 $Oseteeosx-m ore sRsoweoo xomo. ooa Hemlock ova nom,00e 87% 87% 0.94 1.07 74% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Ironwood $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.40 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Reche Canyon Moreno Valley City Limit Locust $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.02 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands Locust Alessandro $39,789,000 $39,789,000 $295,000 27% 27% 0.80 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Redlands SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 Eucalyptus $3,966,000 $3,966,000 $29,000 0% 0% 0.46 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $29,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Moreno Valley Theodore SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 0% 0% 0.44 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Ellis Goetz Evans $9,526,000 $9,526,000 $247,000 0% 0% 0.08 0.14 $0 $0 $0 $247,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Oleander Ramona $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.71 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Ramona Morgan $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.80 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Morgan Rider $0 $0 $0 50% 50% 0.83 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Rider Placentia $0 $0 $0 11% 11% 0.55 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Placentia Nuevo $6,492,000 $6,492,000 $169,000 9% 4% 0.54 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans Nuevo Ellis $17,705,000 $17,705,000 $460,000 01/. 0% 0.00 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $460,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans San Jacinto River bridge $11,136,000 $11,136,000 $384,000 01/. 0% 0.00 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Evans 1-215 bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 01/. 0% 0.00 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Goetz Lesser Ethanac $7,845,000 $7,845,000 $204,000 7% 7% 0.79 1.13 $0 $0 $0 $204,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Haney Knox 1-215 Indian $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.31 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Haney Knox 1-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.99 1.62 88% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Haney Knox Indian Penis $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.12 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Haney Knox Perris Redlands $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.25 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 Munieta $16,971,000 $16,971,000 $126,000 0% 0% 0.51 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $126,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $19,736,000 $0 0% 0% 1.53 2.50 60% $12,962,000 $0 $12,962,000 $0 $0 $0 $12,962,000 Central Perris Nuevo Murneto Dunlap $4,367,000 $4,367,000 $113,000 0% 0% 0.35 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris Nuevo Perris Valley Storm Channel bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.35 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) 1-215 Ethanac $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.69 0.98 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Perris SR-74 (Matthews) 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $21,835,000 $0 0% 0% 1.41 2.42 67% $10,863,000 $0 $10,863,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,863,000 Central Unincorporatec Center (Main) 1-215 Mt Vemon $0 $0 $0 4% 4% 0.39 0.67 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Center (Main) 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $11,912,000 $0 0% 0% 2.38 3.22 36% $20,786,000 $0 $20,786,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,786,000 Central Unincorporatec Center (Main) BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 $690,000 0% 0% 0.46 0.82 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Ellis Post SR-74 $11,550,000 $11,550,000 $300,000 0% 0% 0.20 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Mount Vernon/CETAP Comdc Center Pigeon Pass $2,582,000 $2,582,000 $77,000 0% 0% 0.58 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Nuevo Dunlap Menifee $8,737,000 $2,505,000 $65,000 100% 100% 0.76 1.30 $0 $6,232,000 $0 $227,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Nuevo San Jacinto River bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 0% 0% 0.77 1.36 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Pigeon Pass/CETAP Corridor Hidden Springs Mount Vernon $8,106,000 $8,106,000 $241,000 0% 0% 1.16 1.33 40% $0 $0 $0 $241,000 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Post Santa Rosa Mine Ellis $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Reche Canyon Reche Vista Moreno Valley City Limit $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.02 0.19 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Central Unincorporatec Redlands San Timoteo Canyon Locust $0 $0 $0 100% 100% 1.32 1.51 31% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona 6th SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.43 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Auto Center Railroad SR-91 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.31 0.32 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Caialco Bedford Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.51 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Hidden Valley Norco Hills McKinley $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Lincoln Parkndge Ontario $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.58 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia 6th Sherbom $7,054,000 $6,419,000 $47,000 senweeo sm ore me,co,o 100% 100% 0.91 1.07 91% $635,000 $0 $635,000 $52,000 $5,000 $5,000 $640,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Temescal Creek bridge $4,176,000 $3,580,000 $123,000 0% 0% 0.93 1.08 86% $596,000 $0 $596,000 $144,000 $0 $0 $596,000 Northwest Corona Magnolia Sherborn Rimpau $0 $0 $0 60% 60% 0.93 1.04 77% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Magnolia Rimpau Ontario $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.71 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Grand Ontario $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.78 0.81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Ontario Foothill $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.40 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main Hidden Valley Parkndge $5,314,000 $4,389,000 $32,000 1001/. 100% 0.94 1.12 83% $925,000 $0 $925,000 $39,000 $7,000 $7,000 $932,000 Northwest Corona Main Parkndge SR-91 $0 $0 $0 seteoo sx-vi xomo- o,00a 8% 8% 0.62 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Main SR-91 S. Grand $0 $0 $0 seteoo araomam 8% 8% 0.66 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Hidden Valley Promenade $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.70 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Promenade SR-91 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.61 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.76 0.81 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley Arington Channel bridge $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.81 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona McKinley BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.81 0.89 $0 $105,560,000 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario 1-15 El Cerrito $13,451,000 $13,451,000 $100,000 32% 32% 0.69 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Lincoln Buena Vista $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.67 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Buena Vista Main $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.47 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Main Kellogg $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.39 0.41 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Kellogg Fullerton $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.36 0.42 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Fullerton Rimpau $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.36 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Ontario Rimpau 1-15 $0 $0 $0 7% 7% 0.45 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Auto Club Buena Vista $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.26 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad BNSF railroad crossing $40,020,000 $40,020,000 $1,380,000 01/. 0% 0.31 0.34 $0 $0 $0 $1,380,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Railroad Buena Vista Main (at Grand) $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.69 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona River Corydon Main $0 $0 $0 senweeo cowaoo ooe zoos 25% 25% 0.71 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Corona Serfas Club SR-91 Green River $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.58 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Northwest Eastvale Archibald Remington River $3,382,000 $3,382,000 $0 247. 24% 0.62 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Mission Bellegrave $0 $0 $0 44% 44% 0.86 1.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Belleqrave Amberhill $199,000 $199,000 $0 01% 0% 0.57 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Amberhill Limonite $2,787,000 $2,787,000 $72,000 01% 0% 0.68 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Limonite Schleisman $991,000 $991,000 $0 01% 0% 0.38 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hamner Schleisman Santa Ana River $5,533,000 $3,675000 $96,000 somo Ano 1-100% 50% 1.24 1.41 33% $1,858,000 $0 $1,858,000 $144,000 $48,000 $48,000 $1,906,000 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Schleisman Walters $419,000 $419:000 $3,000 01% 0% 0.86 1.69 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Walters River $21,503,000 $21,503,000 $160,000 01% 0% 0.69 1A4 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Hellman Cucamonga Creek bridge $3,828,000 $3,828,000 $132,000 01% 0% 0.69 1A4 $0 $0 $0 $132,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 Eastvale Gateway $289,000 $289,000 $0 100% 100% 0.93 1.32 92% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite I-15 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.67 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Eastvale Gateway Hamner $255,000 $255,000 $0 100% 100% 0.95 1.36 90% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Hamner Sumner $1,094,000 $1,094,000 $28,000 eer»een xomne,ona s�noio, 50% 50% 0.80 1.16 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Sumner Harrison $497,000 $497,000 $0 01% 0% 0.77 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Harrison Archibald $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Archibald Hellman (Keller SBD Co.) $2,208,000 $2,208,000 $57,000 01% 0% 0.00 0.35 $0 $0 $0 $57,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale Limonite Cucamonga Creek bridge $13,920,000 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.64 0.75 $0 $13,920,000 $0 $480,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Eastvale River Hellman Archibald $5,948,000 $5,948,000 $44,000 01% 0% 0.67 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Armstrong San Bernardino County Valley $6,192,000 $6,192,000 $176,000 eee eon sionoona vonov 33% 33% 0.83 1.14 $0 $0 $0 $176,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Belleqrave Cantu-Galleano Ranch Van Buren $464,000 $464,000 $12,000 01% 0% 0.43 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Cantu-Galleano Ranch Wineville Bellegrave $793,000 $793,000 $21,000 01% 0% 0.14 0.27 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda Philadelphia SR-60 $1,515,000 $989,000 $25,000 eeeeon son aemominocounn ona seso 100% 100% 1.11 1.49 65% $526,000 $0 $526,000 $39,000 $14,000 $14,000 $540,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Etiwanda SR-60 Limonite $0 $0 $0 12% 12% 0.61 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite I-15 Wineville $0 $0 $0 eeeeon-isona-isxeon eomp 15% 15% 0.82 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Wineville Efiwanda $0 $0 $0 9% 9% 0.76 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Efiwanda Van Buren $2,981,000 $2,981,000 $77,000 eeµeen met ona seom 23% 23% 0.80 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Van Buren Clay $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.67 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Limonite Clay Riverview $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.64 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Rubidoux Santa Ana River $5,181,000 $0 $O 40% 40% 0.86 1.06 $0 $5,181,000 $0 $135,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Market Santa Ana River bridge $13,920,000 $6,204,000 $214,000 01% 0% 1.13 1.32 45% $7,716,000 $0 $7,716,000 $480,000 $0 $0 $7,716,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission Milliken SR-60 $0 $0 $0 58% 58% 0.90 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Mission SR-60 Santa Ana River $0 $0 $0 c,o:m,o,00na somo Ano 1- 13% 13% 0.57 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Riverview Limonite Mission $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.55 0.56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux Pine Mission $0 $0 $0 eereonss-eaweone sax, ona zaix one Morcor 9% 9% 0.86 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Jurupa Valley Rubidoux SR-60 interchange $32,698,000 $9,051,000 $0 01% 0% 1.61 1.88 28% $23,647,000 $0 $23,647,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,647,000 Northwest Jurupa Valley Valley Armstrong Mission $0 $0 $0 100% 100% 1.22 1.47 44% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Parkrdge Mountain $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.75 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 1st Mountain Hamner $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.38 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 2nd River I-15 $0 $0 $0 eer»een xomne,ona-ism on eomp 7% 7% 0.74 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th Hamner Califomia $0 $0 $0 eer»een xomne,ona-1 xeon eomp 9% 9% 0.68 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco 6th I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $3,489,000 $0 01% 0% 2.57 2.77 11% $29,209,000 $0 $29,209,000 $0 $0 $0 $29,209,000 Northwest Norco Arington Crestview Fairhaven $4,342,000 $4,342,000 $113,000 eeµeen ae.,miowom roimo.on 100% 100% 0.79 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco California Arington 6th $15,237,000 $12,525,000 $93,000 eeeeon Anmstonom nxona coon r000 78% 78% 0.96 1.14 77% $2,712,000 $0 $2,712,000 $113,000 $20,000 $20,000 $2,732,000 Northwest Norco Corydon River 5th $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.52 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River bridge $33,408,000 $11,455,000 $395,000 01% 0% 1.41 1.67 34% $21,953,000 $21,621,000 $332,000 $1,152,000 $0 $0 $332,000 Northwest Norco Hamner Santa Ana River Hidden Valley $49,591,000 $49,591,000 $368,000 eeeeon oonarona somo Ano m.o, 67. 6% 0.65 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $368,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley I-15 Norco Hills $0 $0 $0 eeeeon-ismeisxeon eomp 37. 3% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Hidden Valley Hamner I-15 $0 $0 $0 eeeeon xomne,ona-is 100% 100% 1.14 1.23 27% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco Norco Corydon Hamner $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.33 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco North California Crestview $0 $0 $0 eeeeon coummo ona oemio.. 100% 100% 0.96 1.19 80% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Norco River Archibald Corydon $1,743,000 $1,109,000 $8,000 79% 79% 1.20 1.56 54% $634,000 $0 $634,000 $13,000 $5,000 $5,000 $639,000 Northwest Riverside 14th Market Martin Luther King $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.66 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 1st Market Main $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.24 0.50 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd SR-91 I-215 $1,941,000 $1,941,000 $14,000 01% 0% 0.49 0.59 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside 3rd BNSF railroad crossing $105,560,000 $30,560,000 $1,054,000 01% 0% 0.77 0.90 $0 $75,000,000 $0 $3,640,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams Arington SR-91 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.49 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 Lincoln $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.44 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Adams SR-91 interchange $32,698,000 $3,262,000 $0 01% 0% 1.46 1.52 10% $29,436,000 $935,000 $28,501,000 $0 $0 $0 $28,501,000 Northwest Riverside Arington Fairhaven La Sierra $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.68 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Buena Vista Santa Ana River Redwood $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.83 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Martin Luther King Central $0 $0 $O 71% 71% 1.02 1.16 55% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Central Country Club $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.70 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Country Club Via Vista $4,996,000 $1,593,000 $45,000 100% 100% 1.30 1.48 32% $3,403,000 $0 $3,403,000 $142,000 $97,000 $97,000 $3,500,000 Northwest Riverside Canyon Crest Via Vista Alessandro $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.59 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Chicago I-215/SR-60 $0 $0 $0 eeeeon cwoosoo.cxopoio, ona convon c,onone won ern 32% 32% 0.80 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 eeeeon 1s-91 ona 1e111.on eomp 67. 6% 0.64 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Alessandro SR-91 $0 $0 $0 eeeeonss-9ionase-9i On eomp.one xomnsxomone azonwe:r 57. 5% 0.75 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Central Van Buren Magnolia $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.43 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Alessandro Spruce $0 $0 $0 43% 43% 0.85 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Chicago Spruce Columbia $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.72 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia Main Iowa $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Columbia 1-215 interchange $32,698,000 $9,050,000 $0 01% 0% 2.96 3.74 28% $23,648,000 $0 $23,648,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,648,000 Northwest Riverside Iowa Center 3rd $30,272,000 $30,272,000 $225,000 11% 11% 0.82 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa 3rd University $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.65 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Iowa University Martin Luther King $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.24 0.36 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside JFK Trautwein Wood $1,880,000 $1,880,000 $49,000 01% 0% 0.54 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Siena Arington SR-91 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.43 0.51 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Siena SR-91 Indiana $192,000 $192,000 $0 01% 0% 0.77 0.85 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside La Siena Indiana Victoria $778,000 $778,000 $0 01% 0% 0.71 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lemon (NB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.11 0.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Van Buren Jefferson $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.23 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Jefferson Washington $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.26 0.49 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Lincoln Washington Victoria $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.39 0.56 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison SR-91 Victoria $853,000 $853,000 $0 01% 0% 0.65 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Madison BNSF railroad crossing $20,010,000 $20,010,000 $690,000 01% 0% 0.81 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $690,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF Railroad Tyler $0 $0 $0i-.n91 aeon eomp. ona sa-91 53% 53% 0.82 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia BNSF railroad crossing $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.90 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Tyler Harrison $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.52 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Magnolia Harrison 14th $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 0.79 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Main 1st San Bernardino County $0 $0 $Oeomprom-m m on romp 43% 43% 0.76 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Market 14th Santa Ana River $9,491,000 $9,491,000 $70,000 eeeeon x.o,00na sonm Ano nice, 21% 21% 0.72 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Martin Luther King 14th 1-215/SR-60 $24,031,000 $24,031,000 $178,000 eeeeon vinonoona soaswi=cony io»•o one-zismoneomp 41% 41% 0.78 0.87 $0 $0 $0 $178,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Mission Inn Redwood Lemon $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.26 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Redwood (SB One way) Mission Inn University $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.59 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Trautwein Alessandro Van Buren $0 $0 $0 43% 43% 0.88 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 Magnolia $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.31 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler SR-91 interchange $63,061,000 $21,814,000 $0 01% 0% 1.56 1.90 35% $41,247,000 $0 $41,247,000 $0 $0 $0 $41,247,000 Northwest Riverside Tyler Magnolia Hole $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.30 0.30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Hole Wells $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.52 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Tyler Wells Arlington $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.59 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University Redwood SR-91 $859,000 $859,000 $0 01% 0% 0.60 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside University SR-91 1-215/SR-60 $2,067,000 $2,067,000 $0 eee„eon ss-m ona sessmon eomp 27. 2% 0.52 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Lincoln Arlington $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.86 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Victoria Madison Washington $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.36 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Washington Victoria Hermosa $27,018,000 $27,018,000 $201,000 34% 34% 0.83 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $201,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood JFK Van Buren $3,053,000 $3,053,000 $79,000 01% 0% 0.81 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Van Buren Berqamont $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.50 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Riverside Wood Bergamonf Kramera $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.55 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DISI CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Northwest Unincorporatec Cantu-Galleono Ranch Hamner Wineville $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Dos Lagos (Weirlck) Temescal Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 22% 22% 0.52 0.72 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec El Cerrito I-15 Ontario $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.15 0.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec El Sobrante Mockingbird Canyon Caialco $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.62 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Harley John Washington Scottsdale $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.38 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Harley John Scottsdale Caialco $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.38 0.73 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec La Sierra Victoria El Sobrante $0 $0 $0 40% 40% 0.85 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec La Sierra El Sobrante Caialco $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.50 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Mockingbird Canyon Van Buren El Sobrante $20,871,000 $20,871,000 $593,000 31% 31% 0.76 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $593,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon El Cerrito Tuscany $3,168,000 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.68 1.07 $0 $3,168,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Tuscany Dos Lagos $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.72 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Dos Lagos Leroy $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.48 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Leroy Dawson Canyon $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.46 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Dawson Canyon I-15 $0 $0 $0 43% 43% 0.66 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon I-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 01/. 0% 0.85 1.35 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon I-15 Park Canyon $14,329,000 $14,329,000 $427,000 27% 27% 0.69 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $427,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Park Canyon Indian Truck Trail $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.02 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Washington Hermosa Harley John $12,787,000 $12,787,000 $332,000 01/. 0% 0.73 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $332,000 $0 $0 $0 Northwest Unincorporatec Wood Krameria Caialco $12,537,000 $12,537,000 $325,000 17% 17% 0.56 0.83 $0 $0 $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning 8th Wilson I-10 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.25 0.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Lincoln Sunset SR-243 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.14 0.16 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey I-10 8th $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.10 0.13 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Ramsey 8th Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.24 0.33 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning SR-243 I-10 Wesley $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.31 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Home Sunset $30,502,000 $30,502,000 $226,000 01/. 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $226,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Smith Creek bridge $8,352,000 $8,352,000 $288,000 01/. 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Montgomery Creek bridge $5,568,000 $5,568,000 $192,000 01/. 0% 0.10 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sun Lakes Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.04 0.05 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset Ramsey Lincoln $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.13 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Sunset I-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 01/. 0% 0.53 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Home 8th $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.06 0.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Banning Wilson Highland Springs Highland Home $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.14 0.24 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Viele Pennsylvania $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.48 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 1st Pennsylvania Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.51 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont 6th I-10 Highland Springs $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.23 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Desert Lawn Champions Oak Valley ISTC) $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.45 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Highland Springs Pennsylvania $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.05 0.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Pennsylvania Oak View $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.14 0.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) Oak View I-10 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.69 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (14th) I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $62,401,000 $0 01/. 0% 0.90 1.14 99% $660,000 $0 $660,000 $0 $0 $0 $660,000 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) UP Railroad Tukwet Canyon $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.01 0.23 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Oak Valley (STC) Tukwet Canyon I-10 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.09 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania 6th 1st $6,588,000 $6,588,000 $49,000 01/. 0% 0.52 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $49,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Beaumont Pennsylvania I-10 interchange $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.51 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Bryant County Line Avenue L $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.38 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa County Line I-10 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.13 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Calimesa I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 01/. 0% 0.54 1.59 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line 7th Bryant $0 $0 $O 13% 13% 0.54 0.71 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa County Line I-10 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 01/. 0% 0.88 1.26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Desert Lawn Palmer Champions $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.04 0A4 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Avenue L Condit $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.43 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton Condit Roberts $12,972,000 $12,972,000 $96,000 01/. 0% 0.74 1.14 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $0 $0 $0 Pass Calimesa Singleton I-10 interchange $63,061,000 $0 $0 01/. 0% 1.04 0.99 0% $63,061,000 $0 $63,061,000 $0 $0 $0 $63,061,000 Pass Calimesa Tukwet Canyon Roberts Rd Palmer $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.71 1.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec Live Oak Canyon Oak Valley (STC) San Bernardino County $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.36 0.47 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec San Timoteo Canyon San Bernardino County UP Railroad $0 $0 $O 22% 22% 0.31 0.66 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Pass Unincorporatec San Timoteo Canyon UP Railroad railroad crossing $52,780,000 $52,780,000 $1,820,000 01/. 0% 0.08 0.48 $0 $0 $0 $1,820,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Acacia Menlo $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.74 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Domeniqoni Stetson $0 $0 $0 26% 26% 0.79 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson RR Crossing Acacia $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.82 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Stetson RR Crossing $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.77 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Sanderson Menlo Esplanade $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.72 0.95 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Warren Cawston $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.62 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74 (Florida) Columbia Ramona $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.47 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet SR-74/SR-79 (Florida) Cawston Columbia $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.38 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Domeniqoni Chambers $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.44 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Chambers Stetson $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.51 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Florida Esplanade $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.33 0.53 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet State Stetson Florida $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.57 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Cawston State $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.49 0.68 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Stetson Warren Cawston $4,357,000 $4,357,000 $113,000 01/. 0% 0.59 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $113,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Esplanade Domeniqoni $19,926,000 $19,926,000 $517,000 31% 31% 0.79 1.10 $0 $0 $0 $517,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Hemet Warren Salt Creek bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 01/. 0% 0.64 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade Mountain State $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.33 0.39 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Esplanade State Warren $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.37 0.55 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Sanderson Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.53 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (North Ramona) State San Jacinto $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.55 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) North Ramona Blvd 7th $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.70 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto SR-79 (San Jacinto) 7th SR-74 $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.32 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Ramona Esplanade $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.60 0.78 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Gilman Springs Quandt Ranch $3,317,000 $3,317,000 $86,000 01/. 0% 0.82 1.01 $0 $0 $0 $86,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State San Jacinto River bridge $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.86 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto State Quandt Ranch Ramona $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.39 0.46 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto San Jacinto Warren Ramona Esplanade $13,469,000 $13,469,000 $350,000 01/. 0% 0.67 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Gilman Springs Sanderson State $11,097,000 $11,097,000 $288,000 01/. 0% 0.83 1.07 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec Gilman Springs Massacre Canyon Wash bridge $1,392,000 $1,392,000 $48,000 01/. 0% 0.85 1.11 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 $0 $0 $0 San Jacinto Unincorporatec SR-79 (Winchester) SR-74 (Florida) Domeniqoni $0 $0 $0 01/. 0% 0.66 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 EXHIBIT H-2 TUMF Network Detailed Cost Estimate - Existing Need and Obligated Funding Updated: July 23, 2024 AREA PLAN DIS CITY STREETNAME SEGMENTFROM SEGMENTTO TOTAL COST MAXIMUM TUMF SHARI MAX TUMF MSHCP SHARE EXIST NEED LOS E&F SEGMENT DESCRIPTION %EXIST NEED >2 LANE ADJST EXIST V/C FUTURE V/C TUMF V/C SHARE EXIST NEED OBLIGATED UNFUND EXIST NEED MSHCP MSHCP EXIST NEED MSHCP UNFUND EXIST NEED COMBINED UNFUND EXIST NEED Southwest Lake Elsinore Corydon Mission Grand $3,336,000 $3,336,000 $87,000 0% 0% 0.73 1.02 $0 $0 $0 $87,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Diamond Mission 1-15 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.73 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Franklin (integral to Railroad i 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $32,698,000 $0 01% 0% 0.66 1.25 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Lincoln Taft $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.65 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Grand Taft SR-74 (Riverside) $3,512,000 $3,512,000 $91,000 01% 0% 0.68 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $91,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake 1-15 Lincoln $39,817,000 $32,726,000 $335,000 senree�«area c,��e aye �nei-issea�eamo 76% 76% 0.99 1.28 77% $7,091,000 $0 $7,091,000 $407,000 $73,000 $73,000 $7,164,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake-15 interchange $32,698,000 $15,771,000 $0 0% 0% 1.08 1.25 48% $16,927,000 $0 $16,927,000 $0 $0 $0 $16,927,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Lake Temescal Wash bridge $2,506,000 $1,150,000 $39,000 0% 0% 1.12 1.31 46% $1,356,000 $0 $1,356,000 $86,000 $0 $0 $1,356,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore Mission Railroad Canyon Bundy Canyon $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.48 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols 1-15 Lake $7,850,000 $7,850,000 $204,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.96 $0 $0 $0 $204,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols Temescal Wash bridge $4,176,000 $4,176,000 $144,000 0% 0% 0.63 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Nichols 1-15 interchange $63,061,000 $63,061,000 $0 0% 0% 0.63 1.12 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-741Collier/Riversidel 1-15 Lakeshore $24,303,000 $24,303,000 $180,000 seeeen cower 31% 31% 0.86 1.05 $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-74 (Grand) Riverside SR-74 (Ortega) $9,733,000 $3,691,000 $27,000 sae aa�emamaa aye ones° 100% 100% 1.19 1.37 38% $6,042,000 $0 $6,042,000 $72,000 $45,000 $45,000 $6,087,000 Southwest Lake Elsinore SR-741Riverside) Lakeshore Grand $20,175,000 $20,175,000 $150,000 saeaan 31% 31% 0.78 0.91 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon 1-15 Lake $7,411,000 $7,411,000 $211,000 0% 0% 0.64 1.17 $0 $0 $0 $211,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Lake Elsinore Temescal Canyon Temescal Wash bridge $3,480,000 $3,480,000 $120,000 01% 0% 0.85 1.28 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Califomia Oaks Jefferson 1-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.47 0.61 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Califomia Oaks 1-15 Jackson $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.76 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta California Oaks Jackson Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.77 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Jackson Whitewood Ynez $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.32 0.62 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Jefferson Palomar Nutmeg $1,562,000 $1,562,000 $44,000 0% 0% 0.07 0.10 $0 $0 $0 $44,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Jefferson Nutmeg Murrieta Ho} Springs $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.46 0.63 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Jefferson Mumeta Hot Springs Cherry $30,634,000 $30,634,000 $227,000 0% 0% 0.47 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $227,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Keller 1-215 Whi}ewood $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.20 0.45 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Keller 1-215 interchange $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.09 0.06 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Los Alamos Jefferson 1-215 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.24 0.38 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Mumeta Hot Springs Jefferson 1-215 $0 $0 $0 saxaanxazaak aye-zis 17% 17% 0.62 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Mumeta Hot Springs 1-215 Margarita $0 $0 $O 11% 11% 0.82 1.08 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Mumeta Ho}Springs Margarita SR-79 (Winchester) $4,057,000 $3,899,000 $101,000 sae aaa..re aaaacauaaaitaea 57% 57% 0.93 1.33 93% $158,000 $0 $158,000 $105,000 $4,000 $4,000 $162,000 Southwest Mumeta Nutmeg Jefferson Clinton Keith $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.45 0.69 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whi}ewood Clinton Keith Los Alamos $2,708,000 $2,708,000 $77,000 0% 0% 0.45 0.76 $0 $0 $0 $77,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whi}ewood Los Alamos Murrieta Hot Springs $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.45 0.75 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mumeta Whi}ewood Mumeta Ho}Springs Jackson $4,629,000 $4,629,000 $47,000 0% 0% 0.15 0.16 $0 $0 $0 $47,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Mume}a Ynez Jackson SR-79 (Winchester) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.62 1.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Mume}a Hot Springs Calle Chapos $816,000 $816,000 $0 0% 0% 0.61 1.15 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Calle Chapos La Serena $696,000 $696,000 $0 01% 0% 0.58 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage La Serena Rancho California $904,000 $904,000 $0i-.nsa sa,a�a a�a ea�ma carramia 100% 100% 0.95 1.21 85% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Rancho California Pauba $846,000 $846,000 $0 saeaan 51% 5% 0.55 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Butterfield Stage Pauba SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $725,000 $725,000 $21,000 0% 0% 0.49 0.84 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Jefferson Cherry Rancho California $2,285,000 $2,285,000 $0 01% 0% 0.34 0.92 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Margarita Mumeta Hot Springs SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $7,644,000 $7,644,000 $0 sae aa�wi„anaea�a�a camna�varoa:. a�a swa�a a�a zsoxxannm aa�ar 5% 5% 0.65 1.04 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Old Town Front Rancho California 1-15/SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.68 1.37 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanqa Pkwy SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Via Gilberto $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 1.02 80 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Pechanga Pkwy Via Gilberto Pechanqa Pkwy $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.42 0.52 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho Califomia Jefferson Margarita $18,254,000 $18,181,000 $101,000 saeaa�i-issso�eamoami-m a�aroa,aea a�a ca:mm 40% 40% 0.90 1.37 99% $73,000 $0 $73,000 $101,000 $0 $0 $73,000 Southwest Temecula Rancho Califomia 1-15 interchange $32,698,000 $0 $0 01% 0% 1.55 2.67 63% $12,098,000 $32,698,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula Rancho California Margarita Butterfield Stage $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.63 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwv) 1-15 Pechanqa Pkwy $0 $0 $0 100% 100% 1.08 1.42 65% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Temecula SR-79 (Temecula Pkwy) Pechanqa Pkwy Butterfield Stage $3,065,000 $3,065,000 $0 0% 0% 0.65 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Briggs Scott SR-79 (Winchester) $6,509,000 $6,509,000 $169,000 0% 0% 0.41 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $169,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Butterfield Stage Tucalota Creek bridge $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.41 0.70 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Butterfield Stage (PourroY) Auld Murrieta Hot Springs $23,076,000 $23,076,000 $656,000 sae aa�n�iaa�e xaaav Pma 23% 12% 0.88 0.99 $0 $0 $0 $656,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Grand Ortega Corydon $68,025,000 $68,025,000 $505,000 saeaa�zi�aea�a sm�aman a�a omaea aye ca.reon 16% 16% 0.80 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $505,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Horsethief Canyon Temescal Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.81 0.64 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Indian Truck Trail Temescal Canyon 1-15 $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.15 0.21 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Mumeta Hot Springs SR-79 (Winchester) Pourroy $0 $0 $0 saeaa�wi„anana,a�a vaa� 4% 4% 0.46 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Pala Pechanqa San Diego County $0 $0 $0 saeaaa Paanaaeaaaa Ram�w oak: 48% 48% 0.88 1.48 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec PourroY SR-79 (Winchester) Auld $2,236,000 $2,236,000 $64,000 01% 0% 0.42 0.57 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Rancho California Butterfield Stage Glen Oaks $87,369,000 $87,369,000 $482,000 0% 0% 0.65 0.93 $0 $0 $0 $482,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Horsethief Canyon Wash bridge $3,340,000 $3,W,000 $115,000 0% 0% 0.66 0.86 $0 $0 $0 $115,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Indian Truck Trail 1-15 $15,739,000 $15,739,000 $447,000 01% 0% 0.64 0.97 $0 $0 $0 $447,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Unincorporatec Temescal Canyon Indian Wash bridge $1,462,000 $1,462,000 $50,000 0% 0% 0.61 0.80 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Bundy Canyon Mission 1-15 $9,704,000 $9,704,000 $72,000 01% 0% 0.60 0.90 $0 $0 $0 $72,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Grand Corydon Wildomar Trail $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.72 0.89 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Mission Bundy Canyon Palomar $0 $0 $0 0% 0% 0.20 0.43 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Clinton Keith Washington $3,227,000 $3,227,000 $84,000 0% 0% 0.59 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Palomar Mission Clinton Keith $13,493,000 $13,493,000 $383,000 0% 0% 0.60 0.88 $0 $0 $0 $383,000 $0 $0 80 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail-15 Baxter $1,281,000 $1,281,000 $33,000 seeeeni-issso�aamata m*�a� 73% 73% 0.87 1.06 $0 $0 $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail -15 interchange $32,698,000 $27,858,000 $0 0% 0% 0.94 1.15 85% $4,840,000 $0 $4,W,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,840,000 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Baxter Palomar $11,316,000 $11,316,000 $84,000 saeaaa sana,amearva,a 35% 35% 0.82 0.94 $0 $0 $0 $84,000 $0 $0 $0 Southwest Wildomar Wildomar Trail Palomar Grand $0 $0 $0 01% 0% 0.87 1.03 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $2,508,329,000 $1,913,028,000 $23,597,000 13.2% $365,640,000 $264,315,000 $330,986,000 $32,098,000 $318,000 $318,000 $331,304,000 Totals Network $ 4,840,250,000 $ 3,874,735,000 $ 53,859,000 12.0% Network unfunded Ewing Need Adjustment $652,275,000 $382,886,000 $ 582,629,000 $ 64,606,000 $ 1,410,000 $ 1,263,000 $ 583,892,000 Transit $ 217,870,000 $ 154,831,000 28.9% Transit E.,, ing Need Adjustment $ 63,039,000 Administration $ 161, 183,000 $ 161,183,000 MSHCP $ 64,606,000 $ 53,859,000 $ 1,263,000 TOTAL $ 5,283,909,000 12.2% Total Unfunded Exi:fins Need Adjustment $ 646,931,000 EXHIBIT H-3 Regional Transit Existing Need Share Summary of Transit Trip Change Year Western Riverside Daily Transit Trips 2023* 16,575 2045** 57,282 Growth 2023 - 2045 40,707 Existing Need Share: 28.9% Future Growth Share: 71.1 Notes: * - 2023 actual average weekday daily ridership provided by RTA staff December 1, 2023 ** - 2045 forecast average weekday daily ridership obtained from SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS Model as provided by Fehr and Peers November Maximum TUMF Transit Component Value RTA Transit Full I MAX TUMF TRANSIT VALUE Mitigation Cost Existing Need Cost $217,870,0001 $63,039,0001 $154,831,000 Total MAX TUMF VALUE $4,297,490,440 Transit Share of MAX TUMF VALUE 3.6% Appendix I - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Distribution In order to ensure an equitable regional/zonal distribution of potential TUMF revenues, the distribution of trips in the WRCOG region was analyzed to determine the distribution between local (intra-zonal) and regional (inter -zonal) trips. This analysis was completed using the Year 2040 No -Build scenario Origin -Destination (O-D) vehicle trip tables from RivCoM. The analysis of vehicle trips based on the respective trip ends as stratified by zone is considered sufficient to establish the rough proportionality between local (intra- zonal) and regional (inter -zonal) trips because this measure is intended to only serve as a guide in the distribution of potential TUMF revenues between regional and local projects, and is not intended to serve as the basis for quantifying the relative magnitude of the impacts of different types of new development on the TUMF network (as described in Appendix J) The first step in the analysis was to create a correspondence table between the traffic analysis zones (TAZ's) in the RivCoM model and the five WRCOG TUMF zones: Northwest, Central, Pass Area, Hemet/San Jacinto, and Southwest. A table detailing the TAZ correspondence for each WRCOG TUMF zone is included as Exhibit 1-1 in this Appendix. The vehicle trip tables by TAZ were aggregated to obtain the trip summary between six districts (five WRCOG TUMF Zones and one for the rest of Southern California region included in the model analysis area) Table 5.1 and 5.2 of the Nexus Study produce a matrix of total combined AM and PM peak period vehicle trips between the six districts. This information is subsequently weighted by TUMF future network lane miles in Table 5.3 to determine the relative share of trips that can be allocated between the backbone network and secondary network. Exhibits 1-2 through 1-9 provide the corresponding peak period vehicle trip matrices for each of the four time periods analyzed by the RivCoM model (AM peak, midday, PM peak and overnight) as well as total daily trips between the six districts. WRCOG 1-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT I-1 RlvCOM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Hemet/San Jacinto TAZ County WRCOG Zone ON 1008 Riverside Central Lake Elsinore 1044 Riverside Central Menifee 1045 Riverside Central Menifee 1046 Riverside Central Menifee 1047 Riverside Central Menifee 1048 Riverside Central Menifee 1049 Riverside Central Menifee 1050 Riverside Central Menifee 1051 Riverside Central Menifee 1052 Riverside Central Menifee 1053 1 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1054 Riverside Central Menifee 1055 Riverside Central Menifee 1056 Riverside Central Menifee 1057 Riverside Central Menifee 1058 Riverside Central Menifee 1059 Riverside Central Menifee 1060 Riverside Central Menifee 1061 Riverside Central Menifee 1062 Riverside Central Menifee 1063 Riverside Central Menifee 1064 Riverside Central Menifee 1065 Riverside Central Menifee 1066 Riverside Central Menifee 1067 Riverside Central Menifee 1068 Riverside Central Menifee 1069 Riverside Central Menifee 1070 Riverside Central Menifee 1071 Riverside Central Menifee 1072 Riverside Central Menifee 1073 Riverside Central Menifee 1074 Riverside Central Menifee 1075 Riverside Central Menifee 1076 Riverside Central Menifee 1077 Riverside Central Menifee 1078 Riverside Central Menifee 1079 Riverside Central Menifee 1080 Riverside Central Menifee 1081 Riverside Central Menifee 1082 Riverside Central Menifee 1083 Riverside Central Menifee 1084 Riverside Central Menifee 1085 Riverside ICentrol Menifee 1086 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1087 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1088 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1089 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1090 Riverside ICentral Menifee 1091 Riverside Central Menifee 1092 Riverside Central Menifee 1093 Riverside Central Menifee 1094 Riverside Central Menifee 1095 Riverside Central Menifee 1096 Riverside Central Menifee 1097 Riverside Central Menifee 1098 Riverside Central Menifee 1099 Riverside Central Menifee 1100 Riverside Central Menifee 1101 Riverside Central Menifee 1102 Riverside ICentral Menifee 03 Riverside Central Menifee 1104 Riverside Central Menifee 1105 Riverside Central Menifee 1106 Riverside Central Menifee 1107 Riverside Central Menifee 1108 Riverside Central Menifee 1109 Riverside Central Menifee 1110 Riverside Central Menifee 1111 Riverside Central Menifee 1112 Riverside Central Menifee Riverside Central Menifee 1113 14 Riverside Central Menifee 1115 Riverside Central Menifee 1116 Riverside Central Menifee 1117 Riverside Central Menifee 1118 Riverside Central Menifee 1119 Riverside Central Menifee 1120 Riverside Central Menifee 1121 Riverside Central Menifee 1122 Riverside Central Menifee 1123 Riverside Central Menifee 1124 Riverside Central Menifee 25 Riverside Central Menifee 1126 Riverside Central Menifee 1127 Riverside Central Menifee 1128 Riverside Central Menifee 1129 Riverside Central Menifee 1130 Riverside Central Menifee 1131 Riverside Central Menifee 1132 Riverside Central Menifee Riverside Central Menifee 1133 34 Riverside Central Menifee Riverside ICentrol Menifee 1135 36 Riverside Central Menifee 1137 Riverside Central Menifee 1138 Riverside Central Menifee 1139 Riverside Central Menifee 1140 Riverside Central Menifee 1141 Riverside Central Menifee 1142 Riverside Central Menifee 1143 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1144 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 45 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1146 Riverside ICentral Moreno Valley 47 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1148 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1149 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1150 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1151 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1152 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1153 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1154 Riverside Central Moreno Valley Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1155 56 Riverside Central Moreno Valley Riverside ICentrol Moreno Valley 1157 58 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1159 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1160 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1161 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1162 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1163 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1164 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1165 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1166 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 67 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1168 Riverside ICentral Moreno Valley 69 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1170 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1171 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1172 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1173 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1174 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1175 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1176 Riverside Central Moreno Valley Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1177 78 Riverside Central Moreno Valley Riverside ICentral Moreno Valley 1179 80 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1181 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1182 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1183 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1184 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1185 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1186 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1187 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1188 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1189 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1190 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1191 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1192 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1193 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1194 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1195 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1196 Riverside Central Moreno Valley TAZ 1197 County Riverside WRCOG Zone Central CIN Moreno Valley 1198 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1199 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1200 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1201 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1202 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1203 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1204 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1205 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1206 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1207 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1208 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1209 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1210 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1211 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1212 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1213 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1214 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1215 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1216 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1217 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1218 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1219 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1220 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1221 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1222 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1223 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1224 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1225 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1226 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1227 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1228 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1229 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1230 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1231 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1232 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1233 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1234 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1235 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1236 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1237 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1238 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1239 Riverside Central Moreno V011ey 1240 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1241 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1242 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1243 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1244 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1245 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1246 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1247 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1248 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1249 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1250 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1251 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1252 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1253 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1254 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1255 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1256 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1257 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1258 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1259 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1260 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1261 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1262 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1263 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1264 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1265 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1266 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1267 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1268 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1269 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1270 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1271 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1272 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1273 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1274 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1275 Riverside Ceniral Moreno Valley 1276 Riverside Ceniral Moreno Valley 1277 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1279 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1280 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1281 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1282 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1283 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1284 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1285 Riverside Central Moreno Valley 1793 Riverside Central Perris 1794 Riverside Central Penis 1795 Riverside Central Perris 1796 Riverside Central Penis 1797 Riverside Central Perris 1798 Riverside Central Penis 1799 Riverside Central Perris 1800 Riverside Central Penis 1801 Riverside Central Perris 1802 Riverside Central Penis 1803 Riverside Central Perris 1804 Riverside Central Penis 1805 Riverside Central Perris 1806 Riverside Central Penis 1807 Riverside Central Perris 1808 Riverside Central Penis 1809 Riverside Central Perris 1810 Riverside Central Penis 1811 Riverside Central Perris 1812 Riverside Central Penis 1813 Riverside Central Perris 1814 Riverside Central Penis 1815 Riverside Central Perris 1816 Riverside Central Penis 1817 Riverside Central Perris 1818 Riverside Central Penis 1819 Riverside Central Perris 1820 Riverside Central Penis 1821 Riverside Central Perris 1822 Riverside Central Penis 1823 Riverside Ceniral Perris 1824 Riverside Central Penis 1825 Riverside Central Perris 1826 Riverside Central Penis 1827 Riverside Central Perris 1828 Riverside Central Penis 1829 Riverside Central Perris 1830 Riverside Central Penis 1831 Riverside Central Perris 1832 Riverside Central Penis 1833 Riverside Central Perris 1834 Riverside Central Penis 1835 Riverside Central Perris 1836 Riverside Central Penis 1837 Riverside Central Perris 1838 Riverside Central Penis 1839 Riverside Central Perris 1840 Riverside Central Penis 1841 Riverside Central Perris 1842 Riverside Central Penis 1843 Riverside Central Perris 1844 Riverside Central Penis 1845 Riverside Ceniral Perris 1846 Riverside Central Penis 1847 Riverside Central Perris 1848 Riverside Central Penis 1849 Riverside Central Perris 1850 Riverside Central Penis 1851 Riverside Central Perris 1852 Riverside Central Penis 1853 Riverside Central Perris 1854 Riverside Central Penis 1855 Riverside Ceniral Pems 1856 Riverside Central Penis TAZ 1857 County Riverside WRCOG Zone Central CIN Perris 1858 Riverside Central Penis 1859 Riverside Central Perris 1860 Riverside Central Penis 1861 Riverside Central Perris 1862 Riverside Central Penis 1863 Riverside Central Perris 1864 Riverside Central Penis 1865 Riverside Central Perris 1866 Riverside Central Penis 1867 Riverside Central Perris 1868 Riverside Central Penis 1869 Riverside Central Perris 1870 Riverside Central Penis 1871 Riverside Central Perris 1872 Riverside Central Penis 1873 Riverside Central Perris 1874 Riverside Central Penis 1875 Riverside Central Perris 1876 Riverside Central Penis 1877 Riverside Central Perris 1878 Riverside Central Penis 1879 Riverside Central Perris 2126 Riverside Central Riverside 2127 Riverside Central Riverside 2128 Riverside Central Riverside 2320 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2327 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2328 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2329 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2330 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2331 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2332 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2333 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2334 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2335 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2336 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2337 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2339 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2341 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2343 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2344 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2345 Riverside Ceniral Unincorporated 2350 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2351 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2352 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2353 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2354 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2359 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2668 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2669 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2673 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2675 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2676 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2677 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2678 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2682 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2683 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2684 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2685 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2686 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2687 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2688 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2689 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2690 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2691 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2692 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2693 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2694 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2709 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2710 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2711 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2712 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2713 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2714 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2715 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2716 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2717 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2719 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2721 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2722 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2723 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2724 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2725 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2727 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2728 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2729 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2733 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2744 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2745 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2746 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2747 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2748 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2752 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2753 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2754 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2755 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2756 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2757 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2758 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2759 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2760 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2761 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2762 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2780 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2781 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2782 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2783 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2784 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2785 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2786 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2787 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2788 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2789 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2793 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2794 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2795 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2796 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2797 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2802 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2804 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2807 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2809 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2825 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2853 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2857 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2862 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2863 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2864 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2869 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2870 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2872 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2875 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2877 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2878 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2879 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2880 Riverside Central I Unincorporated 2905 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2906 Riverside Central Unincorporated 2907 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3177 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3183 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3225 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3227 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3228 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3229 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3230 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3231 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3232 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3233 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3235 Riverside Central Unincorporated 3236 1 Riverside ICentral I Unincorporated EXHIBIT 1-1 (continued) RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Hemet/San Jacinto TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 642 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 643 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 644 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 645 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 646 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 647 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 648 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 649 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 650 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 651 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 652 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 653 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 654 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 655 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 656 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 657 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 658 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 659 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 660 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 661 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 662 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 663 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 664 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 665 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 666 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 667 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 668 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 669 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 670 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 671 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 672 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 673 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 674 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 675 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 676 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 677 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 678 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 679 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 680 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 681 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 682 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 683 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 684 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 685 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 686 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 687 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 688 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 689 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 690 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 691 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 692 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 693 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 694 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 695 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 696 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 697 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 698 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 699 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 700 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 701 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 702 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 703 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 704 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 705 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 706 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 707 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 708 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 709 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 710 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 711 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 712 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 713 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 714 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 715 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 716 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 717 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 718 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 719 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 720 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 721 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 722 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 723 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 724 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 725 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 726 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 727 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 728 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 729 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 730 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 731 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 732 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 733 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 734 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 735 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 736 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 737 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet 735 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Hemet TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 2135 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2136 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2137 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2138 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2139 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2140 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2141 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2142 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2143 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2144 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2145 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2146 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2147 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2148 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2149 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2150 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2151 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2152 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2153 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2154 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2155 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2156 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2157 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2158 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2159 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2160 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2161 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2162 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2163 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2164 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2165 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2166 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2167 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2168 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2169 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2170 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2171 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2172 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2173 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2174 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2175 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2176 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2177 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2178 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2179 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2180 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2181 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2182 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2183 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2184 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2185 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2186 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2187 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2188 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2189 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2190 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2191 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2192 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2193 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2194 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2195 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2196 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2197 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2198 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2199 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2200 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2201 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2202 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2203 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2204 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2205 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2206 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2207 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto San Jacinto 2324 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2325 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2326 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2338 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2340 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2342 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2346 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2347 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2348 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2349 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2358 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2360 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2361 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2362 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2471 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2472 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2491 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2493 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2494 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2625 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2626 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2628 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2630 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2631 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 2625 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2626 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2628 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2630 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2631 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2632 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2633 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2634 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2635 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2641 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2642 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2643 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2644 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2645 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2646 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2647 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2648 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2649 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2651 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2652 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2653 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2654 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2655 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2660 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2670 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2679 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2810 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2811 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2812 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2815 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2816 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2817 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2818 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2819 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2820 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2821 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2822 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2823 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2824 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2826 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2827 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2828 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2829 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2830 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2831 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2832 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2833 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2834 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2835 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2836 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2839 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2840 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2841 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2842 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2843 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2844 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2845 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2848 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2850 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2851 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2856 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2865 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2866 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2867 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2868 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2871 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2873 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2874 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2876 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2881 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2882 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2883 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2884 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2885 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2886 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2887 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2888 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2889 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2890 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2891 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2892 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2893 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2894 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2895 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2919 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2920 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2921 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2922 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2934 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2935 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2936 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2937 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 2938 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3194 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3195 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3196 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3197 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3198 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3242 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3243 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3244 Riverside Hemet/San Jacinto Unincorporated 3245 Riverside Hemet/San Jacin}o Unincorporated EXHIBIT 1-1 (continued) RlyCOM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Northwest TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 332 Riverside Northwest Corona 333 Riverside Northwest Corona 334 Riverside Northwest Corona 335 Riverside Northwest Corona 336 Riverside Northwest Corona 337 Riverside Northwest Corona 338 Riverside Northwest Corona 339 Riverside Northwest Corona 340 Riverside Northwest Corona 341 1 Riverside 1 Northwest Corona 342 Riverside Northwest Corona 343 Riverside Northwest Corona 344 Riverside Northwest Corona 345 Riverside Northwest Corona 346 Riverside Northwest Corona 347 Riverside Northwest Corona 348 Riverside Northwest Corona 349 Riverside Northwest Corona 350 Riverside Northwest Corona 351 Riverside Northwest Corona 352 Riverside Northwest Corona 353 Riverside Northwest Corona 354 Riverside Northwest Corona 355 Riverside Northwest Corona 356 Riverside Northwest Corona 357 Riverside Northwest Corona 358 Riverside Northwest Corona 359 Riverside Northwest Corona 360 Riverside Northwest Corona 361 Riverside Northwest Corona 362 Riverside Northwest Corona 363 Riverside Northwest Corona 364 Riverside Northwest Corona 365 Riverside Northwest Corona 366 Riverside Northwest Corona 367 Riverside Northwest Corona 368 Riverside Northwest Corona 369 Riverside Northwest Corona 370 Riverside Northwest Corona 371 Riverside Northwest Corona 372 Riverside Northwest Corona 373 Riverside Northwest Corona 374 Riverside Northwest Corona 375 Riverside Northwest Corona 376 Riverside Northwest Corona 377 Riverside Northwest Corona 378 Riverside Northwest Corona 379 Riverside Northwest Corona 380 Riverside Northwest Corona 381 Riverside Northwest Corona 382 Riverside Northwest Corona 383 Riverside Northwest Corona 384 Riverside Northwest Corona 385 Riverside Northwest Corona 386 Riverside Northwest Corona 387 Riverside Northwest Corona 388 Riverside Northwest Corona 389 Riverside Northwest Corona 390 Riverside Northwest Corona 391 Riverside Northwest Corona 392 Riverside Northwest Corona 393 Riverside Northwest Corona 394 Riverside Northwest Corona 395 Riverside Northwest Corona 396 Riverside Northwest Corona 397 Riverside Northwest Corona 398 Riverside Northwest Corona 399 Riverside Northwest Corona 400 Riverside Northwest Corona 401 Riverside Northwest Corona 402 Riverside Northwest Corona 403 Riverside Northwest Corona 404 Riverside Northwest Corona 405 Riverside Northwest Corona 406 Riverside Northwest Corona 407 Riverside Northwest Corona 408 Riverside Northwest Corona 409 Riverside Northwest Corona 410 Riverside Northwest Corona 411 Riverside Northwest Corona 412 Riverside Northwest Corona 413 Riverside Northwest Corona 414 Riverside Northwest Corona 415 Riverside Northwest Corona 416 Riverside Northwest Corona 417 Riverside Northwest Corona 418 Riverside Northwest Corona 419 Riverside Northwest Corona 420 Riverside Northwest Corona 421 Riverside Northwest Corona 422 Riverside Northwest Corona 423 Riverside Northwest Corona 424 Riverside Northwest Corona 425 Riverside Northwest Corona 426 Riverside Northwest Corona 427 Riverside Northwest Corona 428 Riverside Northwest Corona 429 Riverside Northwest Corona 430 Riverside Northwest Corona 431 Riverside Northwest Corona 432 Riverside Northwest Corona 433 Riverside Northwest Corona 434 Riverside Northwest Corona 435 Riverside Northwest Corona 436 Riverside Northwest Corona 437 Riverside Northwest Corona 438 Riverside Northwest Corona 439 Riverside Northwest Corona 440 Riverside Northwest Corona 441 Riverside Northwest Corona 442 Riverside Northwest Corona 443 Riverside Northwest Corona 444 Riverside I Northwest Corona 445 Riverside Northwest Corona 446 Riverside Northwest Corona 447 Riverside Northwest Corona 448 Riverside Northwest Corona 449 Riverside Northwest Corona 450 Riverside Northwest Corona 451 Riverside Northwest Corona 452 Riverside Northwest Corona 453 Riverside Northwest Corona 454 Riverside Northwest Corona 455 1 Riverside I Northwest Corona 456 Riverside Northwest Corona 457 Riverside Northwest Corona 458 Riverside Northwest Corona 459 Riverside Northwest Corona 460 Riverside Northwest Corona 461 Riverside Northwest Corona 462 Riverside Northwest Corona 463 Riverside Northwest Corona 464 Riverside Northwest Corona 465 Riverside Northwest Corona 466 Riverside Northwest Corona 467 Riverside Northwest Corona 468 Riverside Northwest Corona 469 Riverside Northwest Corona 470 Riverside Northwest Corona 471 Riverside Northwest Corona 472 Riverside Northwest Corona 473 Riverside Northwest Corona 474 Riverside Northwest Corona 475 Riverside Northwest Corona 476 Riverside Northwest Corona 477 Riverside Northwest Corona 478 Riverside Northwest Corona 479 Riverside Northwest Corona 480 Riverside Northwest Corona 481 Riverside Northwest Corona 482 Riverside Northwest Corona 483 Riverside Northwest Corona 484 Riverside Northwest Corona 485 Riverside Northwest Corona 486 Riverside Northwest Corona 487 Riverside Northwest Corona 488 Riverside Northwest Corona 489 Riverside Northwest Corona 490 Riverside Northwest Corona 491 Riverside Northwest Corona 492 Riverside Northwest Corona 493 Riverside Northwest Corona 494 Riverside Northwest Corona 495 Riverside Northwest Corona 496 Riverside Northwest Corona 497 Riverside Northwest Corona 498 Riverside Northwest Corona 499 Riverside Northwest Corona 500 Riverside Northwest Corona 501 Riverside Northwest Corona 502 Riverside Northwest Corona 503 Riverside Northwest Corona 504 Riverside Northwest Corona 505 Riverside Northwest Corona 506 Riverside Northwest Corona 507 Riverside Northwest Corona 508 Riverside Northwest Corona 509 Riverside Northwest Corona 510 Riverside Northwest Corona 511 Riverside Northwest Corona 512 Riverside Northwest Corona 513 Riverside Northwest Corona 514 Riverside Northwest Corona 515 Riverside Northwest Corona 516 Riverside Northwest Corona 517 Riverside Northwest Corona 518 Riverside Northwest Corona 519 Riverside Northwest Corona TAZ 520 Countv Riverside WRCOG Zone Northwest CWy Corona 521 Riverside Northwest Corona 522 Riverside Northwest Corona 523 Riverside Northwest Corona 524 Riverside Northwest Corona 525 Riverside Northwest Corona 526 Riverside Northwest Corona 527 Riverside Northwest Corona 528 Riverside Northwest Corona 529 1 Riverside 1 Northwest Corona 530 Riverside Northwest Corona 531 Riverside Northwest Corona 532 Riverside Northwest Corona 533 Riverside Northwest Corona 534 Riverside Northwest Corona 535 Riverside Northwest Corona 536 Riverside Northwest Corona 537 Riverside Northwest Corona 538 Riverside Northwest Corona 539 Riverside Northwest Corona 540 1 Riverside I Northwest Corona 541 Riverside Northwest Corona 542 Riverside Northwest Corona 543 Riverside Northwest Corona 544 Riverside Northwest Corona 545 Riverside Northwest Corona 546 Riverside Northwest Corona 547 Riverside Northwest Corona 548 Riverside Northwest Corona 549 Riverside Northwest Corona 550 Riverside Northwest Corona 551 1 Riverside I Northwest Corona 552 Riverside Northwest Corona 553 Riverside Northwest Corona 554 Riverside Northwest Corona 555 Riverside Northwest Corona 556 Riverside Northwest Corona 557 Riverside Northwest Corona 558 Riverside Northwest Corona 559 Riverside Northwest Corona 560 Riverside Northwest Corona 561 Riverside Northwest Corona 562 1 Riverside I Northwest Corona 563 Riverside Northwest Corona 564 Riverside Northwest Corona 565 Riverside Northwest Corona 566 Riverside Northwest Corona 567 Riverside Northwest Corona 568 Riverside Northwest Corona 569 Riverside Northwest Corona 603 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 604 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 605 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 606 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 607 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 608 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 609 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 610 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 611 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 612 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 613 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 614 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 615 1 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 616 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 617 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 618 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 619 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 620 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 621 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 622 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 623 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 624 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 625 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 626 1 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 627 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 628 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 629 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 630 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 631 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 632 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 633 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 634 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 635 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 636 1 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 637 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 638 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 639 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 640 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 641 Riverside Northwest Eastvale 842 Riverside Northwest J—pa Valley 843 Riverside Northwest Juwpa Valley 844 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 845 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 846 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 847 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 848 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 849 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 850 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 851 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 852 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 853 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 854 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 855 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 856 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 857 1 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 858 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 859 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 860 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 861 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 862 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 863 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 864 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 865 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 866 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 867 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 868 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 869 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 870 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 871 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 872 Riverside Northwest Jurupo Valley 873 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 874 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 875 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 876 Riverside Northwest I Jurupa Valley 877 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 878 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 879 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 880 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 881 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 882 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 883 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 884 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 885 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 886 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 887 Riverside Northwest I Jurupa Valley 888 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 889 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 890 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 891 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 892 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 893 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 894 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 895 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 896 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 897 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 898 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 899 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 900 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 901 Riverside Northwest I Jurupa Valley 902 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 903 Riverside Northwest Jurupa Valley 1540 Riverside Northwest Norco 1541 Riverside Northwest Norco 1542 Riverside Northwest Norco 1543 Riverside Northwest Norco 1544 Riverside Northwest Norco 1545 Riverside Northwest Norco 1546 Riverside Northwest Norco 1547 Riverside Northwest Norco 1548 Riverside Northwest Norco 1549 Riverside Northwest Norco 1550 Riverside Northwest Norco 1551 Riverside Northwest Norco 1552 Riverside Northwest Norco 1553 Riverside Northwest Norco 1554 Riverside Northwest Norco 1555 Riverside Northwest Norco 1556 Riverside Northwest Norco 1557 Riverside Northwest Norco 1558 1 Riverside I Northwest Norco 1559 Riverside Northwest Norco 1560 Riverside Northwest Norco 1561 Riverside Northwest Norco 1562 Riverside Northwest Norco 1563 Riverside Northwest Norco 1564 Riverside Northwest Norco 1565 Riverside Northwest Norco 1566 Riverside Northwest Norco 1567 Riverside Northwest Norco 1568 Riverside Northwest Norco TAZ 1910 County Riverside WRCOG Zone Northwest City Riverside 1911 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1912 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1913 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1914 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1915 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1916 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1917 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1918 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1919 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1920 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1921 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1922 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1923 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1924 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1925 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1926 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1927 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1928 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1929 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1930 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1931 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1932 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1933 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1934 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1935 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1936 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1937 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1938 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1939 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1940 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1941 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1942 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1943 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1944 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1945 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1946 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1947 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1948 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1949 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1950 Riverside 1 Northwest Riverside 1951 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1952 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1953 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1954 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1955 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1956 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1957 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1958 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1959 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1960 1 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1961 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1962 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1963 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1964 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1965 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1966 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1967 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1968 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1969 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1970 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1971 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1972 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1973 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1974 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1975 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1976 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1977 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1978 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1979 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1980 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1981 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1982 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1983 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1984 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1985 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1986 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1987 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1988 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1989 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1990 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1991 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1992 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1993 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1994 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1995 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1996 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1997 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1998 Riverside Northwest Riverside 1999 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2000 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2001 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2002 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2003 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2004 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2005 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2006 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2007 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2008 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2009 1 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2010 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2011 Riverside Northwest I Riverside 2012 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2013 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2014 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2015 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2016 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2017 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2018 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2019 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2020 1 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2021 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2022 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2023 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2024 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2025 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2026 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2027 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2028 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2029 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2030 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2031 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2032 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2033 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2034 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2035 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2036 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2037 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2038 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2039 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2040 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2041 Riverside 1 Northwest I Riverside 2042 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2043 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2044 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2045 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2046 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2047 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2048 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2049 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2050 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2051 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2052 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2053 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2054 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2055 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2056 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2057 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2058 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2059 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2060 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2061 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2062 1 Riverside INorthwest Riverside 2063 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2064 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2065 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2066 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2067 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2068 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2069 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2070 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2071 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2072 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2073 1 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2074 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2075 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2076 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2077 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2078 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2079 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2080 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2081 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2082 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2083 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2084 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2085 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2086 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2087 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2088 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2089 Riverside Northwest Riverside TAZ 2090 County Riverside WRCOG Zone Northwest CWy Riverside 2091 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2092 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2093 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2094 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2095 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2096 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2097 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2098 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2099 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2100 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2101 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2102 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2103 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2104 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2105 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2106 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2107 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2108 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2109 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2110 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2111 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2112 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2113 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2114 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2115 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2116 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2117 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2118 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2119 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2120 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2121 Riverside I Northwest Riverside 2122 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2123 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2124 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2125 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2129 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2130 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2131 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2132 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2133 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2134 Riverside Northwest Riverside 2321 1 Riverside I Northwest Unincorporated 2322 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2370 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2371 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2372 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2373 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2374 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2375 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2376 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2377 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2378 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2379 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2380 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2381 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2382 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2383 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2384 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2385 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2386 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2387 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2388 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2389 1 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2390 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2391 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2392 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2393 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2394 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2397 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2398 Riverside Northwest I Unincorporated 2399 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2400 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2401 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2402 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2403 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2404 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2405 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2406 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2407 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2408 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2409 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2410 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2411 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2412 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2413 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2586 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2587 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2588 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2589 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2590 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2591 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2592 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2593 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2594 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2595 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2596 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2597 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2598 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2599 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2600 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2601 1 Riverside 1 Northwest Unincorporated 2602 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2603 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2604 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2605 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2606 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2607 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2664 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2666 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2671 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2672 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2680 1 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2681 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2705 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2706 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2707 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2726 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2730 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2731 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2732 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2734 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2735 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2736 1 Riverside I Northwest Unincorporated 2737 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2738 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2739 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2740 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2741 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2742 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2743 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2749 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2750 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2751 Riverside Northwes} Unincorporated 2763 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2764 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2765 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2766 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2767 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2768 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2769 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2770 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2771 1 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2772 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2773 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2774 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2775 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2776 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2777 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2778 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2779 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2790 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2791 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2792 Riverside Northwest I Unincorporated 2798 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2799 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2800 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2801 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2803 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2805 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2806 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 2808 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3093 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3146 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3147 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3148 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3149 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3152 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3174 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3185 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3186 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3187 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3188 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3189 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3190 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3191 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3192 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3193 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3203 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3204 Riverside Northwest Unincorporated 3206 Riverside Northwest jUnincorporated EXHIBIT 1-1 (continued) RIvCOM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Pass TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 1 Riverside Pass Banning 2 Riverside Pass Banning 3 Riverside Pass Banning 4 Riverside Pass Banning 5 Riverside Pass Banning 6 Riverside Pass Banning 7 Riverside Pass Banning 8 Riverside Pass Banning 9 Riverside Pass Banning 10 1 Riverside I Pass Banning 11 Riverside Pass Banning 12 Riverside Pass Banning 13 Riverside Pass Banning 14 Riverside Pass Banning 15 Riverside Pass Banning 16 Riverside Pass Banning 17 Riverside Pass Banning 18 Riverside Pass Banning 19 Riverside Pass Banning 20 Riverside Pass Banning 21 1 Riverside I Pass Banning 22 Riverside Pass Banning 23 Riverside Pass Banning 24 Riverside Pass Banning 25 Riverside Pass Banning 26 Riverside Pass Banning 27 Riverside Pass Banning 28 Riverside Pass Banning 29 Riverside Pass Banning 30 Riverside Pass Banning 31 Riverside Pass Banning 32 1 Riverside I Pass Banning 33 Riverside Pass Banning 34 Riverside Pass Banning 35 Riverside Pass Banning 36 Riverside Pass Banning 37 Riverside Pass Banning 38 Riverside Pass Banning 39 Riverside Pass Banning 40 Riverside Pass Banning 41 Riverside Pass Banning 42 Riverside Pass Banning 43 1 Riverside I Pass Banning 44 Riverside Pass Banning 45 Riverside Pass Banning 46 Riverside Pass Banning 47 Riverside Pass Banning 48 Riverside Pass Banning 49 Riverside Pass Banning 50 Riverside Pass Banning 51 Riverside Pass Banning 52 Riverside Pass Banning 53 Riverside Pass Banning 54 1 Riverside I Pass Banning 55 Riverside Pass Banning 56 Riverside Pass Banning 57 Riverside Pass Beaumont 58 Riverside Pass Beaumont 59 Riverside Pass Beaumont 60 Riverside Pass Beaumont 61 Riverside Pass Beaumont 62 Riverside Pass Beaumont 63 Riverside Pass Beaumont 64 Riverside Pass Beaumont 65 1 Riverside I Pass Beaumont 66 Riverside Pass Beaumont 67 Riverside Pass Beaumont 68 Riverside Pass Beaumont 69 Riverside Pass Beaumont 70 Riverside Pass Beaumont 71 Riverside Pass Beaumont 72 Riverside Pass Beaumont 73 Riverside Pass Beaumont 74 Riverside Pass Beaumont 75 Riverside Pass Beaumont 76 1 Riverside I Pass Beaumont 77 Riverside Pass Beaumont 78 Riverside Pass Beaumont 79 Riverside Pass Beaumont 80 Riverside Pass Beaumont 81 Riverside Pass Beaumont 82 Riverside Pass Beaumont 83 Riverside Pass Beaumont 84 Riverside Pass Beaumont 85 Riverside Pass Beaumont 86 Riverside Pass Beaumont 87 1 Riverside I Pass Beaumont 88 Riverside Pass Beaumont 89 Riverside Pass Beaumont 90 Riverside Pass Beaumont 91 Riverside Pass Beaumont 92 Riverside Pass Beaumont 93 Riverside Pass Beaumont 94 Riverside Pass Beaumont 95 Riverside Pass Beaumont 96 Riverside Pass Beaumont 97 Riverside Pass Beaumont 98 Riverside Pass Beaumont 99 Riverside Pass Beaumont 100 Riverside Pass Beaumont 101 Riverside Pass Beaumont 102 Riverside Pass Beaumont 103 Riverside Pass Beaumont 104 Riverside Pass Beaumont 105 Riverside Pass Beaumont 106 Riverside Pass Beaumont 107 Riverside Pass Beaumont 108 Riverside Pass Beaumont 109 Riverside Pass Beaumont 110 Riverside Pass Beaumont 111 Riverside Pass Beaumont 112 Riverside Pass Beaumont 113 Riverside Pass Beaumont 114 Riverside Pass Beaumont AZ 128 County Riverside WRCOG Zone Pass SMLMMMMMMW- Calimesa 129 Riverside Pass Calimesa 130 Riverside Pass Calimesa 131 Riverside Pass Calimesa 132 Riverside Pass Calimesa 133 Riverside Pass Calimesa 134 Riverside Pass Calimesa 135 Riverside Pass Calimesa 136 Riverside Pass Calimesa 137 1 Riverside I Pass Calimesa 138 Riverside Pass Calimesa 139 Riverside Pass Calimesa 140 Riverside Pass Calimesa 141 Riverside Pass Calimesa 142 Riverside Pass Calimesa 143 Riverside Pass Calimesa 144 Riverside Pass Calimesa 145 Riverside Pass Calimesa 146 Riverside Pass Calimesa 147 Riverside Pass Calimesa 148 1 Riverside I Pass Calimesa 149 Riverside Pass Calimesa 150 Riverside Pass Calimesa 151 Riverside Pass Calimesa 152 Riverside Pass Calimesa 153 Riverside Pass Calimesa 154 Riverside Pass Calimesa 1278 Riverside Pass Moreno Valley 2323 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2355 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2356 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2357 Riverside I Pass Unincorporated 2363 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2364 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2365 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2627 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2629 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2638 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2639 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2640 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2650 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2656 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2657 1 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2658 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2659 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2661 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2667 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2674 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2858 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2859 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2896 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2897 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2898 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2899 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2900 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2901 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2902 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2903 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2904 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2908 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2909 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2910 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2911 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2912 Riverside I Pass Unincorporated 2913 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2914 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2915 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2916 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2917 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2927 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2939 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2940 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2941 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2942 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2943 1 Riverside I Pass Unincorporated 29" Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2945 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2946 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2947 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2948 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2949 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2950 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2951 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 2952 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3042 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3156 1 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3157 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3158 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3159 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3160 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3161 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3164 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3216 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3217 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3218 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3219 1 Riverside Pms Unincorporated 3220 Riverside Pas Unincorporated 3221 Riverside Pass Unincorporated 3222 Riverside Pass jUnircorporated 3223 1 Riverside I Pass I Unincorporated EXHIBIT 1-1 (continued) RIyCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zone - Southwest TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 155 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 156 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 157 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 158 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 159 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 160 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 161 Riverside Southwest Canyon Lake 938 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 939 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 940 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 941 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 942 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 943 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 944 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 945 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 946 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 947 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 948 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 949 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 950 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 951 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 952 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 953 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 954 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 955 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 956 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 957 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 958 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 959 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 960 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 961 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 962 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 963 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 964 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 965 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 966 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 967 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 968 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 969 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 970 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 971 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 972 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 973 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 974 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 975 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 976 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 977 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 978 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 979 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 980 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 981 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 982 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 983 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 984 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 985 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 986 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 987 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 988 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 989 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 990 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 991 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 992 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 993 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 994 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 995 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 996 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 997 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 998 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 999 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1000 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1001 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1002 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1003 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1004 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1005 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1006 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1007 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1009 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1010 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1011 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1012 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1013 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1014 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1015 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1016 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1017 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1018 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1019 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1020 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1021 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1022 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1023 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1024 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1025 1 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1026 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1027 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1028 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1029 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1030 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1031 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1032 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1033 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1034 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1035 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1036 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1037 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1038 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1039 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1040 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1041 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1042 Riverside ISouthwest Lake Elsinore 1043 Riverside Southwest Lake Elsinore 1286 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1287 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1288 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1289 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1290 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1291 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1292 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1293 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1294 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1295 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1296 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1297 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1298 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1299 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1300 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1301 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1302 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1303 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1304 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1305 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1306 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1307 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1308 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1309 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1310 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1311 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1312 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1313 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1314 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1315 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1316 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1317 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1318 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1319 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1320 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1321 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1322 1 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1323 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1324 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1325 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1326 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1327 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1328 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1329 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1330 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1331 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1332 1 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1333 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1334 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1335 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1336 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1337 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1338 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1339 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1340 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1341 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1342 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1343 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1344 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1345 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1346 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1347 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1348 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1349 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1350 Riverside Southwest Murrieta TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 1351 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1352 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1353 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1354 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1355 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1356 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1357 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1358 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1359 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1360 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1361 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1362 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1363 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1364 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1365 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1366 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1367 Riverside Southwest Murrieta I Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1369 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1370 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1371 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1372 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1373 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1374 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1375 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1376 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1377 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1378 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1379 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1380 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1381 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1382 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1383 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1384 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1385 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1386 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1387 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1388 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1389 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1390 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1391 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1392 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1393 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1394 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1395 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1396 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1397 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1398 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1399 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1400 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1401 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1402 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1403 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1404 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1405 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1406 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1407 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1408 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1409 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1410 Riverside ISouthwest Murrieta 1411 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1412 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1413 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1414 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1415 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1416 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1417 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1418 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1419 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1420 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1421 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1422 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1423 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1424 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1425 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1426 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1427 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1428 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1429 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1430 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1431 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1432 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1433 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1434 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1435 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1436 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1437 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1438 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1439 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1440 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1441 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1442 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1443 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1444 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1445 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1446 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1447 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1448 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1449 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1450 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1451 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1452 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1453 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1454 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1455 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1456 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1457 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1458 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1459 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1460 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1461 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1462 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1463 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1464 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1465 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1466 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1467 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1468 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1469 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1470 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1471 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1472 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1473 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1474 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1475 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1476 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1477 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1478 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1479 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1480 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1481 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1482 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1483 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1484 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1485 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1486 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1487 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1488 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1489 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1490 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1491 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1492 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1493 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1494 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1495 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1496 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1497 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1498 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1499 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1500 1 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1501 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1502 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1503 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1504 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1505 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1506 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1507 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1508 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1509 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1510 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1511 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1512 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1513 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1514 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1515 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1516 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1517 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1518 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1519 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1520 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1521 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1522 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1523 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1524 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1525 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1526 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1527 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1528 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1529 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1530 Riverside Southwest Murrieta TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 1531 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1532 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1533 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1534 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1535 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1536 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1537 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1538 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 1539 Riverside Southwest Murrieta 2208 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2209 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2210 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2211 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2212 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2213 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2214 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2215 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2216 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2217 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2218 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2219 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2220 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2221 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2222 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2223 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2224 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2225 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2226 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2227 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2228 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2229 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2230 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2231 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2232 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2233 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2234 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2235 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2236 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2237 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2238 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2239 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2240 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2241 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2242 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2243 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2244 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2245 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2246 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2247 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2248 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2249 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2250 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2251 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2252 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2253 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2254 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2255 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2256 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2257 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2258 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2259 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2260 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2261 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2262 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2263 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2264 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2265 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2266 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2267 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2268 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2269 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2270 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2271 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2272 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2273 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2274 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2275 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2276 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2277 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2278 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2279 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2280 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2281 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2282 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2283 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2284 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2285 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2286 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2287 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2288 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2289 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2290 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2291 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2292 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2293 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2294 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2295 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2296 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2297 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2298 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2299 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2300 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2301 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2302 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2303 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2304 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2305 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2306 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2307 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2308 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2309 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2310 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2311 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2312 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2313 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2314 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2315 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2316 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2317 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2318 Riverside ISouthwest Temecula 2319 Riverside Southwest Temecula 2395 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2396 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2414 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2422 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2423 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2424 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2425 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2426 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2427 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2428 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2429 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2465 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2466 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2467 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2473 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2474 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2475 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2476 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2477 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2478 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2479 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2480 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2481 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2492 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2495 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2496 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2497 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2498 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2499 1 Riverside ISouthwest Unincorporated 2500 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2501 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2509 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2510 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2511 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2512 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2518 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2519 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2520 Riverside Southwest I Unincorporated 2521 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2522 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2523 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2524 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2528 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2529 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2530 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2531 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2532 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2533 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2534 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2535 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2536 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2537 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2538 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2539 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2540 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated TAZ County WRCOG Zone City 2541 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2542 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2543 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2544 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2545 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2546 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2547 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2548 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2549 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2550 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2551 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2552 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2553 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2554 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2555 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2556 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2557 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2558 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2559 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2560 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2561 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2562 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2563 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2564 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2582 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2583 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2584 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2585 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2662 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2663 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2665 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2695 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2696 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2697 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2698 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2699 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2700 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2701 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2702 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2703 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2704 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2708 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2718 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2720 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2813 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2814 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2837 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2838 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2846 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2847 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2849 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2852 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2854 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2855 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2860 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 2861 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3091 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3092 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3094 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3095 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3096 1 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3097 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3098 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3099 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3100 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3101 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3102 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3103 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3104 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3105 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3106 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3108 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3109 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3110 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3111 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3112 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3113 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3114 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3115 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3116 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3117 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3118 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3119 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3120 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3121 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3122 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3123 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3124 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3125 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3126 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3127 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3128 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3129 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3130 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3131 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3132 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3133 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3134 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3135 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3136 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3137 Riverside ISouthwest Unincorporated 3138 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3145 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3150 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3176 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3199 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3200 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3201 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3202 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3205 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3207 Riverside ISouthwest Unincorporated 3212 Riverside ISouthwest Unincorporated 3213 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3214 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3224 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3226 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3234 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3237 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3238 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3239 1 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3240 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3241 Riverside Southwest Unincorporated 3246 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3247 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3248 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3249 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3250 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3251 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3252 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3253 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3254 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3255 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3256 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3257 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3258 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3259 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3260 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3261 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3262 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3263 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3264 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3265 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3266 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3267 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3268 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3269 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3270 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3271 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3272 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3273 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3274 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3275 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3276 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3277 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3278 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3279 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3280 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3281 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3282 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3283 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3284 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3285 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3286 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3287 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3288 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3289 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3290 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3291 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3292 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3293 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3294 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3295 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3296 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3297 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3298 Riverside Southwest Wildomar 3299 Riverside Southwest Wildomar EXHIBIT 1.1 (continued) RNCaM TAZ Carrespandence by WRCOG TUMF Zones - Riverside CoanN OUhide WRCOG TAI III CovMv Riverside WICOG Zone Oulslde TUMF Zones CIN Blythe 116 117 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zane, Outside TUMF Zones BIyMe Blvthe 118 119 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Blythe Blvthe 120 121 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Blythe Blvthe 122 123 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Blythe Blvthe 124 125 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Blythe Blvthe 1126 2] Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Blythe BNthe 162 163 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral CiN 164 165 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 166 167 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 168 169 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 170 171 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 172 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 173 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 174 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 175 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 176 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 1]] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 178 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 179 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 18D Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 181 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 182 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 183 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 184 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 1:5 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 6 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 187 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 188 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 189 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 190 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 191 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 192 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 193 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 194 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City 195 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Citv 1196 97 Riverside Riverside OutSlde TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 198 199 Riverside Riverside I Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMFZones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 200 201 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 202 203 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 204 205 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 206 207 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 208 209 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 210 211 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Ci Cathedral Citv 212 213 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 214 215 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 216 217 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 218 219 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 220 221 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 222 223 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral Ci Cathedral Citv 224 225 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 226 227 Riverside Riverside OutSlde TUMFZones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 228 229 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 230 231 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 232 233 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 234 235 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 236 237 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 238 239 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Cathedral Citv 240 241 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Cathedral City Coachella 242 243 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 244 245 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 246 247 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 248 249 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 250 251 Riverside Riverside OutSlde TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella .3 253 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMFZones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 254 255 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 256 252 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 258 259 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 260 261 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 262 263 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 264 265 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 266 267 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 268 269 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 270 271 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 272 273 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 274 275 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 276 277 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 278 279 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 28D 281 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 282 283 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 284 285 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 286 287 Riverside Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Outside TUMF Zones Coachella Coachella 288 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 289 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 290 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 291 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 292 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 293 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 294 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 295 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 296 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 297 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 298 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 2" Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 300 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 301 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 302 Riverside Outride TUMF Zones Coachella 303 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 304 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 305 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 306 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 307 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 308 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 309 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 310 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 311 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 312 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 313 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 314 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 315 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 316 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 317 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 318 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 319 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 320 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 321 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 322 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 323 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 324 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 325 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 326 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 327 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 328 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 329 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 330 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 331 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Coachella 570 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 571 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 572 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 573 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Son-, 574 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 5]5 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 576 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Salinas 5]] Riverside I Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 578 Riverside I Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas S79 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 5� Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 581 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Desert Hot Springs 582 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 583 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones DesertHotSan- 584 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Salinas 585 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 586 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 587 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 588 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Salinas 589 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 590 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 591 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 592 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Salinas 593 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 594 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Salinas 595 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonngs 596 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 597 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 598 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 5" Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Son-, 600 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot$pnnas 601 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Desert Hot Sonnas 602 Riverside OUt,ide TUMF Zones Desert Hot $pnnas 0� m 0 0 0 ® � r-3ff?-T3URzU-TM� 0 0 0 1661 —w Riverside WICOG Zone Outside TUMF Zones CBv Palm Desert 1662 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI, Desert 1663 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1664 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1665 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1666 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1667 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1668 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1669 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1670 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1671 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1672 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1673 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1674 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1675 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1676 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 16]] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1678 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1679 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1680 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1681 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1682 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1684 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1686 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1687 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1688 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1689 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1690 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1691 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Desert 1692 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Semsts 1693 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1694 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1695 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1696 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1697 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1698 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1699 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sromgs 1700 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1701 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1702 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1703 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1704 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1705 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones PalmSan- 1]06 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1707 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1708 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1709 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sromgs 1710 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1Jll Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1712 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1713 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1714 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1715 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Swings 1716 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1717 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Snrmgs 1718 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1719 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Si ings 1720 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1721 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1722 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1723 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1724 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Spnnas 1725 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1726 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1727 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1728 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1729 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1730 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1731 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sant, 1732 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sonngs 1733 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones PalmSan- 1]34 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1735 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sn ings 1736 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1]3] Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1]38 Riverside OUt,ide TUMFZones POIm $poops 1739 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1740 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1741 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1742 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas IM Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sant, 1744 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnes 1745 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sprngs 1]46 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sonnps 1]4] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sant, 1748 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1749 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1750 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Spnnas MIRivehide Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1752 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1753 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1754 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1755 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1756 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1757 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1758 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1759 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1760 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1761 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Snrmgs 1762 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Spnnas 1]63 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1764 Riverside OUt,ide TUMFZones POIm $poops 1765 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1766 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1767 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1768 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1769 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1]]0 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1]]I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Snrmgs 1]]2 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1]]3 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1]]4 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1775 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Springs 1]]6 Riverside Outside TUMFZones POI,Spnnas 1777 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1]]8 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1]]9 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Sprngs 1780 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1781 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Stung, 1782 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 17W Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1784 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Spnnas 1785 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1786 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Spnnas 1787 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1788 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Palm Iromes 1789 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Springs 1790 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POIm Spnnas 1791 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Palm Snrmgs 1792 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones POI,Sromns 1880 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1881 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Miaae 1882 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1883 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1884 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1885 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1886 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1887 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1888 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Rancho Mirage 1889 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle MO Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1891 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1892 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1893 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1894 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1895 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1896 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1897 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1898 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1899 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1900 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1901 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1%2 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones an Rancho Mirage 1903 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Rrmcho Made 1904 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1905 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1906 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1907 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 1908 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Mirage 1%9 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Rancho Middle 2366 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2367 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2368 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2369 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2415 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2416 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2417 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2418 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2419 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2420 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2421 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2430 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2431 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2432 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2433 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2434 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2435 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2436 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2437 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2438 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2439 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2440 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2441 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2442 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2443 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2444 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2445 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2446 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2447 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2448 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2449 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2450 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2451 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2452 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2453 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2454 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2455 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2456 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2457 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2458 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2459 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2460 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2461 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2462 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2463 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2464 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2468 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2469 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2470 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2482 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2483 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2484 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2485 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2486 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2487 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2488 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2489 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2490 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2A2 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2503 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2504 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2505 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2506 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2507 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2508 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2513 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2514 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 2515 Riverside 10utside TUMFZones UnlncOrPOrat¢d 251Z6 COVMv Riverside WRCOGZone Outside TUMF Zones CIN Unincorporated 251] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones UninCOMI—d 2525 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2526 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones UninComorated 2527 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2565 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2566 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 256] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2568 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2569 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2570 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 257I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2572 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2573 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2574 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 25]5 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2576 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 25]] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2578 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 25]9 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2580 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2581 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2608 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2609 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2610 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2611 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2612 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2613 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2614 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated M15 Riverside Outride TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2616 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2617 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2618 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2619 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2620 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2621 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2622 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2623 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2624 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2636 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2637 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2918 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2923 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2924 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2925 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2926 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2928 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2929 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2930 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2931 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2932 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 2933 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2953 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2954 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2955 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2956 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2957 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2958 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2959 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2960 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2961 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2962 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2963 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2964 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2965 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2966 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2967 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2968 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2969 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2970 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 297I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2972 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2973 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2974 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2975 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2976 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 29]] Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2978 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2979 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2980 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2981 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2982 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2983 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2984 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 29M Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2986 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 2987 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2988 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2989 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2"0 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2"1 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2992 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2993 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2994 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2995 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2996 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 2997 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 2998 Riverside Outride TUMFZones Unincorporated 2999 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3000 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 30DI Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3002 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3lM Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 3004 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 30D5 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3006 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 30D7 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3008 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 30D9 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3010 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3011 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3012 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3073 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3014 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3015 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 3016 Riverside Ou151de TUMFZones Unincorporated 301] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3018 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3019 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3020 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3021 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3022 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones UnInCOrpOrated 3023 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3024 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3025 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3026 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3027 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3028 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincorporated 3029 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3030 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3031 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3032 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3033 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3034 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3035 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3036 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 303] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3038 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3039 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3040 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3041 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 3043 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3044 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3045 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3046 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3047 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3048 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3049 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3050 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3051 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3052 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3053 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3054 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3055 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3056 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 3057 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3058 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3059 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3060 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3061 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3062 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3063 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3064 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3065 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3066 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3067 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3068 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 3069 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3070 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 307I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3072 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3073 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3074 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3075 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3076 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 30]] Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3078 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3079 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3080 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3081 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3082 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3083 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3084 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3085 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3086 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3087 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3088 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3089 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3090 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3107 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3139 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3140 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3141 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3142 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3143 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3144 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3151 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3153 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3154 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3155 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3162 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3163 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3165 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3166 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 3167 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated 3168 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3169 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3170 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 317I Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3172 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3173 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3175 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3178 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3179 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 31W Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3181 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3182 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3184 Riverside Outride TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3" Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3209 Riverside Outride TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3210 Riverside Outside TUMF Zones Unincomorated 3211 Riverside I Outside TUMF Zones Unincorporated 3215 Riverside Outside TUMFZones Unincomorated EXHIBIT 1-1 (continued) RivCoM TAZ Correspondence by WRCOG TUMF Zones - Outside Riverside County TAZ County WRCOG Zone 3300 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3301 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3302 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3303 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3304 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3305 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3306 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3307 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3308 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3309 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3310 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3311 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3312 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3313 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3314 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3315 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3316 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3317 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3318 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3319 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3320 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3321 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3322 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3323 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3324 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3325 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3326 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3327 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3328 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3329 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3330 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3331 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3332 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3333 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3334 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3335 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3336 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3337 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3338 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3339 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3340 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3341 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3342 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3343 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3344 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3345 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3346 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3347 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3348 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3349 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3350 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3351 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3352 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3353 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3354 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3355 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3356 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3357 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3358 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3359 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3360 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3361 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3362 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3363 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3364 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3365 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3366 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3367 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3368 Orange Outside TUMF Zones 3369 Orange Outside TUMF Zones TAZ County WRCOG Zone 3370 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3371 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3372 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3373 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3374 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3375 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3376 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3377 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3378 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3379 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3380 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3381 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3382 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones 3383 San Diego Outside TUMF Zones EXHIBIT 1-2 - 2045 AM Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 187,280 10,596 40,037 2,900 24,865 25,446 291,124 Hemet/San Jacinto 13,060 93,350 3,815 31847 7,263 8,090 129,424 Northwest 26,655 1,189 333,593 1,239 4,956 86,710 454,342 Pass Area 3,663 3,372 2,768 49,166 402 14,458 73,828 Southwest 25,061 7,304 14,708 914 298,362 27,954 374,302 Outside WRCOG 15,413 3,353 86,546 11,208 14,949 131,469 TOTAL 271,131 119,163 481,467 69,274 350,797 162,658 1,454,490 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-3 - 2045 AM Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64.3% 3.6% 13.8% 1.0% 8.5% 8.7% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 10.1 % 72.1 % 2.9% 3.0% 5.6% 6.3% 100% Northwest 5.9% 0.3% 73.4% 0.3% 1.1 % 19.1 % 100% Pass Area 5.0% 4.6% 3.7% 66.6% 0.5% 19.6% 100% Southwest 6.7% 2.0% 3.9% 0.2% 79.7% 7.5% 100% * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-4 - 2045 PM Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 230,328 12,878 49,743 3,401 30,237 32,112 358,698 Hemet/San Jacinto 16,341 115,656 4,833 41586 8,818 9,988 160,221 Northwest 31,923 1,495 409,641 1,448 6,076 109,331 559,914 Pass Area 4,405 4,214 3,346 61,219 506 17,876 91,566 Southwest 30,752 8,928 18,144 1,062 368,893 34,759 462,537 Outside WRCOG 18,495 4,221 106,166 13,282 18,918 161,380 TOTAL 332,244 147,391 591,872 84,997 433,447 204,065 1,794,017 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-5 - 2045 PM Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64.2% 3.6% 13.9% 0.9% 8.4% 9.0% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 10.2% 72.2% 3.0% 2.9% 5.5% 6.2% 100% Northwest 5.7% 0.3% 73.2% 0.3% 1.1 % 19.5% 100% Pass Area 4.8% 4.6% 3.7% 66.9% 0.6% 19.5% 100% Southwest 6.6% 1.9% 3.9% 0.2% 79.8% 7.5% 100% * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-6 - 2045 Off -Peak Period Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 313,691 17,511 64,577 3,948 39,446 41,718 480,890 Hemet/San Jacinto 21,579 162,035 5,659 6,318 10,987 11,533 218,110 Northwest 43,461 1,848 565,759 1,528 7,406 160,552 780,554 Pass Area 6,068 6,269 4,125 91,253 631 24,354 132,700 Southwest 40,442 11,861 22,506 1,132 508,327 40,698 624,964 Outside WRCOG 25,307 5,301 145,054 16,534 23,061 215,257 TOTAL 450,546 204,825 807,679 120,712 589,859 278,854 2,452,475 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 Table 1-7 - 2045 Off -Peak Period Percent Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 65.2% 3.6% 13.4% 0.8% 8.2% 8.7% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 9.9% 74.3% 2.6% 2.9% 5.0% 5.3% 100% Northwest 5.6% 0.2% 72.5% 0.2% 0.9% 20.6% 100% Pass Area 4.6% 4.7% 3.1 % 68.8% 0.5% 18.4% 100% Southwest 6.5% 1.9% 3.6% 0.2% 81.3% 6.5% 100% * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-8 - 2045 Daily Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 731,298 40,985 154,356 10,249 94,547 99,276 1,130,712 Hemet/San Jacinto 50,980 371,040 14,306 14,750 27,068 29,611 507,755 Northwest 102,039 4,532 1,308,993 4,215 18,439 356,593 1,794,811 Pass Area 14,136 13,855 10,239 201,638 1,539 56,688 298,095 Southwest 96,254 28,093 55,358 3,108 1,175,582 103,410 1,461,804 Outside WRCOG 59,214 12,874 337,766 41,024 56,927 507,806 TOTAL 1,053,921 471,379 1,881,018 274,984 1,374,103 645,578 5,700,982 * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 EXHIBIT 1-9 - 2045 Percent Daily Vehicle Trips by WRCOG Zone* TO FROM Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64.7% 3.6% 13.7% 0.9% 8.4% 8.8% 100% Hemet/San Jacinto 10.0% 73.1% 2.8% 2.9% 5.3% 5.8% 100% Northwest 5.7% 0.3% 72.9% 0.2% 1.0% 19.9% 100% Pass Area 4.7% 4.6% 3.4% 67.6% 0.5% 19.0% 100% Southwest 6.6% 1.9% 3.8% 0.2% 80.4% 7.1 % 100% * Based on RIVCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, February 2024 Appendix J - Western Riverside County Regional Trip Purpose On September 27, 2013, California Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 743 into law, fundamentally changing the way that transportation impacts are to be assessed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The new law requires CEQA guidelines to be amended to provide an alternative to Level of Service for evaluating transportation impacts. The intent of the change is to introduce alternate criteria that "promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses." (New Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1).) The primary effect of the new law is to establish the use of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) as the preferred basis for measuring traffic impacts, in recognition of the fact that VMT more accurately reflects traffic impacts as it takes into account both the number of trips being made and the distance of those trips. Although CEQA and the specific provision of SB 743 do not generally apply directly to impact fee programs (which are governed by the provision of the Mitigation Fee Act), the reasoning behind SB 743 establishing VMT as the preferred basis for CEQA traffic impact measurement is sound and equally applicable for impact fee nexus determination. Linking the TUMF to VMT does enable developers to continue to use TUMF participation as demonstration of partial mitigation for their cumulative regional transportation impacts under the new SB 743 requirements. Furthermore, consistent with SB 743, consideration of travel impacts in terms of peak period VMT more accurately reflects the realities of travel behavior as the basis for determining impacts on the regional transportation system by reflecting the peak demands on the system based on the number of trips and the cumulative distance these trips occupy facilities in the system. Variation in trip length for different trip purposes is important to quantify since the impact associated with a trip is not limited to whether a trip occurs or not. A longer distance trip occupies more roadways over a longer period of time (all else being equal), and therefore goes through more intersections and consumes more capacity, thus requiring greater levels of mitigation. As the purpose of the TUMF is to mitigate the cumulative regional traffic impacts of future growth, a VMT based approach to defining the rough proportionality of impacts resulting from various differing types of new development better aligns with this purpose. RivCoM is the primary analytical toll used to forecast VMT in Riverside County. RivCoM was developed based on the SCAG regional travel demand model, whose underlying model travel characteristics were developed based on national and regional travel behavior surveys, including the U.S. Census and the California Household Travel Survey. The methodology for using travel demand models, including RivCoM, as the basis for calculating and measuring VMT is consistent with NEPA and CEQA guidance, and accepted transportation planning practice. The RivCoM model produces person -trips (irrespective of mode choice) on the basis of five trip purposes including home -based -work (HBW), home -based -other (HBO), home - based -school (HBS), home -based -university (HBU), and non -home based (NHB). Peak period, off-peak period and daily vehicle trips and VMT are derived from the person -trip productions based on mode choice assignments and differing trip length WRCOG J-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 characteristics embedded on the model parameters. Daily VMT results were aggregated into home -based VMT and non -home -based VMT for each scenario to represent the level of travel demand and impact on the transportation system attributable to each trip purpose. The attribution of VMT associated with home -based trip purposes to residential land uses and non -home -based trips to non-residential land uses is consistent with the provisions of NCHRP Report #187 Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters User's Guide (Transportation Research Board, 1978), a widely - referenced source for travel estimation techniques used for travel demand modeling. Chapter 2 of this report, which details trip generation estimation, states that "HBW (Home Based Work) and HBNW (Home Based Non Work) trips are generated at the households, whereas the NHB (Non -Home Based) trips are generated elsewhere." Consistent with NCHRP Report # 187, aggregating person trip productions and associated VMT into home -based (combining home -based -work, home -based -other and home -based -school) and non -home -based (combining work -based -other, and other -based -other) represents an appropriate way to allocate trip generation and associated impacts between residential and non-residential land uses for the purpose of estimating the rough proportionality of the TUMF fee. Exhibits J-1 through J-36 of this Appendix include the RivCoM model data aggregated for peak period, off-peak period and daily person VMT for each trip purpose between the respective TUMF zones, and for both model year scenarios. The growth in daily VMT for each trip purpose was calculated as the difference between the daily VMT in the 2018 Existing scenario and the daily VMT in the 2045 No Build scenario. The growth in home -based daily VMT represents 77.7% of the total growth in daily VMT, and the growth in non -home -based daily VMT represents 22.3% of the total growth in daily VMT, as shown in Table 5.4. The relative share of the growth in daily VMT summarized in Table 5.4 provides the basis for estimating the rough proportionality of the TUMF network impacts and related mitigation costs (and associated fees) attributable to new residential and non-residential development, respectively. WRCOG J-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT J-1 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL PEAK PERIOD TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,084,569 176,144 919,950 98,767 494,843 1,672,280 4,446,553 Hemet/San Jacinto 202,282 474,270 189,620 93,211 207,871 736,736 1,903,990 Northwest 471,239 62,909 3,082,883 69,489 235,185 3,500,199 7,421,903 Pass Area 86,956 66,611 120,609 230,246 31,017 531,753 1,067,192 Southwest 474,113 188,640 635,435 61,535 1,822,831 2,240,495 5,423,048 Outside WRCOG 833,664 293,941 3,584,150 403,303 1,245,556 129,717,014 136,077,627 TOTAL 3,152,824 1,262,514 8,532,646 9561551 4,037,302 138,398,477 156,340,3 4] Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-2 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 165,241 58,992 411,439 65,622 197,893 1,220,777 2,119,965 Hemet/San Jacinto 70,807 53,805 128,758 48,898 103,290 567,394 972,951 Northwest 143,340 37,259 674,676 53,185 136,185 1,920,635 2,965,279 Pass Area 25,983 15,665 65,646 34,287 18,981 304,632 465,194 Southwest 165,236 76,537 376,007 49,330 410,382 1,721,102 2,798,594 Outside WRCOG 420,948 169,433 1,777,239 260,161 753,400 45,139,830 48,521,011 TOTAL 991,555 411,691 3,433,764 511,483 1,620,131 50,874,369 57,842,994 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-3 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 673,880 84,730 364,070 26,370 227,784 361,436 1,738,269 Hemet/San Jacinto 100,994 306,411 50,898 33,509 84,214 146,284 722,311 Northwest 239,023 20,386 1,679,367 13,441 81,648 1,178,130 3,211,995 Pass Area 45,133 33,006 42,321 129,128 10,013 167,567 427,168 Southwest 234,369 82,255 197,098 10,679 1,016,873 402,898 1,944,172 Outside WRCOG 326,013 98,751 1,241,409 108,093 389,492 54,404,000 56,567,758 TOTAL 1,619,412 625,538 3,575,162 321,221 1,810,024 56,660,315 64,611,673 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-4 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 110,735 3,642 21,950 387 16,486 6,055 159,255 Hemet/San Jacinto 8,004 43,231 162 666 2,726 70 54,859 Northwest 20,225 79 221,291 28 2,091 56,821 300,535 Pass Area 1,326 1,697 103 16,564 7 4,939 24,635 Southwest 19,735 3,035 4,593 7 138,861 1,084 167,315 Outside WRCOG 6,136 402 60,940 5,117 10,948 5,978,607 6,062,150 TOTAL 166,161 52,086 309,039 22,769 171,120 6,047,576 6,768,750 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-5 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 116,617 17,407 82,092 6,004 49,146 58,568 329,833 Hemet/San Jacinto 20,422 60,529 6,881 9,918 17,117 18,684 133,551 Northwest 61,455 2,779 414,635 2,683 14,253 282,505 778,310 Pass Area 12,768 11,566 8,715 49,680 1,935 47,061 131,725 Southwest 40,694 13,037 27,856 1,225 237,362 49,558 369,732 Outside WRCOG 65,953 13,263 341,047 28,498 87,982 22,327,971 22,864,713 TOTAL 317,908 118,582 881,227 98,008 407,795 22,784,346 24,607,865 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-6 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 18,096 11,373 40,399 384 3,534 25,445 99,231 Hemet/San Jacinto 2,056 10,293 2,922 220 523 4,304 20,318 Northwest 7,195 2,406 92,914 152 1,007 62,109 165,784 Pass Area 1,747 4,677 3,824 587 80 7,554 18,470 Southwest 14,080 13,775 29,881 293 19,353 65,853 143,236 Outside WRCOG 14,614 12,092 163,514 1,433 3,734 1,866,606 2,061,994 TOTAL 57,788 54,616 333,455 3,070 28,232 2,031,871 2,509,032 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-7 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL OFF PEAK TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 801,662 128,869 640,224 56,860 339,965 988,339 2,955,918 Hemet/San Jacinto 140,692 363,274 109,533 65,159 132,656 415,778 1,227,093 Northwest 340,558 37,798 2,341,566 37,213 141,992 2,394,837 5,293,964 Pass Area 67,550 54,436 80,501 191,165 19,798 353,246 766,697 Southwest 330,176 130,997 414,647 31,788 1,358,749 1,284,306 3,550,663 Outside WRCOG 569,970 187,134 2,517,328 247,784 764,704 97,045,358 101,332,277 TOTAL 2,250,608 902,509 6,103,800 629,968 2,757,864 102,481,863 115,126,612 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-8 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 64,053 23,015 164,150 25,429 78,516 519,620 874,784 Hemet/San Jacinto 27,710 20,523 51,954 19,949 40,698 244,713 405,547 Northwest 57,811 15,473 261,251 21,801 56,354 811,368 1,224,059 Pass Area 10,592 6,429 27,063 12,994 8,220 128,530 193,828 Southwest 65,794 29,706 153,862 20,870 157,689 724,854 1,152,774 Outside WRCOG 187,105 76,293 763,815 115,048 322,353 17,962,924 19,427,539 TOTAL 413,065 171,439 1,422,095 216,091 663,831 20,392,010 23,278,531 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-9 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 518,247 66,043 291,090 21,528 180,073 324,734 1,401,715 Hemet/San Jacinto 77,692 230,275 41,945 28,302 64,944 130,834 573,991 Northwest 181,766 15,629 1,296,905 11,001 63,383 1,010,885 2,579,569 Pass Area 35,416 25,064 34,290 99,409 8,287 138,571 341,037 Southwest 181,290 62,892 165,057 8,746 793,860 357,826 1,569,671 Outside WRCOG 262,051 76,387 1,010,627 87,034 296,373 42,030,568 43,763,040 TOTAL 1,256,461 476,289 2,839,914 256,020 1,406,920 43,993,419 50,229,023 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-10 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 29,899 1,018 5,963 112 4,495 1,879 43,367 Hemet/San Jacinto 2,171 11,723 46 212 743 22 14,915 Northwest 5,315 22 59,984 8 572 16,387 82,287 Pass Area 367 460 31 4,489 2 1,358 6,707 Southwest 5,242 828 1,239 2 37,812 304 45,428 Outside WRCOG 1,679 106 16,999 1,337 2,522 1,608,845 1,631,488 TOTAL 44,671 14,158 84,261 6,159 46,147 1,628,796 1,824,191 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-11 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 171,868 26,165 127,774 9,573 74,861 103,539 513,780 Hemet/San Jacinto 31,023 89,467 11,465 16,561 25,978 33,500 207,994 Northwest 88,808 4,136 620,263 4,317 21,165 472,709 1,211,397 Pass Area 19,327 17,223 13,991 73,960 3,239 74,839 202,580 Southwest 61,789 19,268 45,891 1,951 356,701 84,988 570,589 Outside WRCOG 103,831 20,636 536,313 43,581 141,283 33,374,718 34,220,361 TOTAL 476,647 176,895 1,355,697 149,943 623,228 34,144,292 36,926,701 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-12 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 17,594 12,628 51,247 218 2,019 38,566 122,272 Hemet/San Jacinto 2,097 11,286 4,124 136 292 6,709 24,645 Northwest 6,858 2,539 103,163 86 517 83,488 196,652 Pass Area 1,849 5,259 5,127 313 49 9,947 22,544 Southwest 16,062 18,302 48,598 219 12,688 116,334 212,202 Outside WRCOG 15,304 13,712 189,575 784 2,172 2,068,303 2,289,850 TOTAL 59,764 63,727 401,834 1,755 17,738 2,323,347 2,868,164 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-13 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL DAILY TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,886,231 305,013 1,560,174 155,627 834,808 2,660,619 7,402,471 Hemet/San Jacinto 342,975 837,544 299,154 158,370 340,527 1,152,514 3,131,082 Northwest 811,797 100,707 5,424,449 106,702 377,177 5,895,035 12,715,867 Pass Area 154,507 121,047 201,110 421,411 50,814 884,999 1,833,889 Southwest 804,289 319,636 1,050,082 93,323 3,181,580 3,524,801 8,973,711 Outside WRCOG 1,403,634 481,075 6,101,478 651,086 2,010,260 226,762,371 237,409,905 TOTAL 5,403,432 2,165,023 14,636,446 1,586,519 6,795,166 240,880,340 271,466,925 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-14 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 229,295 82,007 575,590 91,051 276,409 1,740,397 2,994,749 Hemet/San Jacinto 98,516 74,328 180,712 68,847 143,988 812,107 1,378,498 Northwest 201,151 52,731 935,927 74,986 192,540 2,732,003 4,189,337 Pass Area 36,574 22,095 92,709 47,281 27,201 433,163 659,022 Southwest 231,030 106,243 529,869 70,200 568,071 2,445,955 3,951,368 Outside WRCOG 608,054 245,727 2,541,054 375,209 1,075,753 63,102,754 67,948,550 TOTAL 1,404,620 583,131 4,855,859 727,574 2,283,962 71,266,379 81,121,525 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-15 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,192,127 150,772 655,160 47,898 407,857 686,170 3,139,984 Hemet/San Jacinto 178,686 536,686 92,843 61,811 149,158 277,118 1,296,302 Northwest 420,789 36,015 2,976,272 24,442 145,031 2,189,015 5,791,564 Pass Area 80,549 58,070 76,610 228,537 18,300 306,138 768,205 Southwest 415,659 145,147 362,155 19,425 1,810,733 760,724 3,513,843 Outside WRCOG 588,064 175,138 2,252,036 195,127 685,865 96,434,568 100,330,798 TOTAL 2,875,873 1,101,828 6,415,076 577,241 3,216,945 100,653,734 114,840,696 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-16 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 140,634 4,660 27,913 499 20,981 7,934 202,622 Hemet/San Jacinto 10,175 54,954 207 877 3,469 92 69,775 Northwest 25,540 101 281,274 36 2,663 73,208 382,822 Pass Area 1,692 2,157 134 21,053 9 6,297 31,343 Southwest 24,977 3,864 5,832 9 176,673 1,388 212,743 Outside WRCOG 7,814 508 77,939 6,454 13,470 7,587,452 7,693,638 TOTAL 210,832 66,244 393,299 28,928 217,266 7,676,372 8,592,941 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-17 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 288,485 43,572 209,866 15,577 124,008 162,106 843,613 Hemet/San Jacinto 51,445 149,996 18,346 26,479 43,095 52,184 341,544 Northwest 150,263 6,915 1,034,898 7,000 35,418 755,213 1,989,708 Pass Area 32,095 28,790 22,706 123,641 5,174 121,900 334,305 Southwest 102,482 32,305 73,748 3,176 594,063 134,546 940,320 Outside WRCOG 169,784 33,899 877,360 72,079 229,264 55,702,689 57,085,075 TOTAL 794,554 295,477 2,236,924 247,951 1,031,023 56,928,638 61,534,566 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-18 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2018 EXISTING To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 35,690 24,001 91,646 601 5,553 64,011 221,503 Hemet/San Jacinto 4,153 21,580 7,046 356 815 11,012 44,963 Northwest 14,054 4,945 196,077 238 1,525 145,596 362,435 Pass Area 3,596 9,936 8,951 900 129 17,502 41,014 Southwest 30,142 32,078 78,478 512 32,040 182,188 355,438 Outside WRCOG 29,918 25,804 353,089 2,217 5,906 3,934,909 4,351,844 TOTAL 117,553 118,344 735,288 4,825 45,970 4,355,218 5,377,197 Based on RivCOM Year 2018 Existing Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-19 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL PEAK PERIOD TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,799,333 331,707 1,246,839 150,237 725,077 2,074,041 6,327,234 Hemet/San Jacinto 419,876 828,755 285,137 155,667 345,759 1,006,889 3,042,083 Northwest 719,180 87,427 3,652,429 90,736 283,636 3,816,550 8,649,959 Pass Area 166,143 123,928 189,122 408,274 39,950 805,993 1,733,411 Southwest 823,445 350,410 894,926 84,115 3,062,054 3,170,545 8,385,495 Outside WRCOG 1,208,763 420,070 4,001,373 598,622 1,482,553 151,663,404 159,374,786 TOTAL 5,136,740 2,142,297 10,269,827 1,487,652 5,939,029 162,537,422 187,512,968 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-20 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 373,364 119,251 639,446 100,864 284,454 1,576,209 3,093,588 Hemet/San Jacinto 172,286 134,504 208,376 88,310 169,783 827,421 1,600,680 Northwest 244,964 48,849 905,169 66,860 143,376 2,007,531 3,416,748 Pass Area 69,297 34,601 118,258 72,874 25,101 465,215 785,345 Southwest 346,327 152,164 600,641 69,322 654,211 2,572,563 4,395,228 Outside WRCOG 627,554 220,846 2,057,129 369,322 678,800 52,699,890 56,653,540 TOTAL 1,833,791 710,214 4,529,019 767,551 1,955,725 60,148,829 69,945,130 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-21 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,062,642 154,854 432,156 38,451 340,614 392,364 2,421,080 Hemet/San Jacinto 190,962 506,337 65,022 49,916 143,277 154,174 1,109,688 Northwest 352,592 31,203 1,941,227 19,896 116,947 1,347,877 3,809,741 Pass Area 73,295 60,143 56,197 230,606 12,927 245,844 679,013 Southwest 365,033 139,169 213,955 13,093 1,806,167 430,821 2,968,236 Outside WRCOG 473,253 165,371 1,354,389 176,377 669,783 64,072,996 66,912,168 TOTAL 2,517,777 1,057,076 4,062,946 528,338 3,089,715 66,644,076 77,899,927 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-22 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 136,895 5,994 23,940 484 20,215 6,298 193,827 Hemet/San Jacinto 13,675 57,088 301 975 4,113 107 76,259 Northwest 23,198 110 237,602 33 2,279 66,566 329,788 Pass Area 1,880 2,406 139 26,717 7 9,600 40,749 Southwest 24,598 3,842 4,731 7 228,422 1,295 262,895 Outside WRCOG 6,723 624 64,150 5,947 16,481 6,271,751 6,365,676 TOTAL 206,969 70,065 330,863 34,163 271,517 6,355,617 7,269,194 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-23 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 202,038 35,728 103,488 10,029 74,959 74,079 500,322 Hemet/San Jacinto 40,465 115,618 8,342 16,222 27,829 20,983 229,458 Northwest 89,752 4,817 459,879 3,793 19,949 335,223 913,414 Pass Area 19,244 20,136 9,751 77,216 1,839 73,705 201,892 Southwest 63,376 22,555 29,308 1,251 322,054 43,941 482,484 Outside WRCOG 88,138 21,358 372,582 45,519 113,947 26,519,796 27,161,341 TOTAL 503,012 220,212 983,351 154,031 560,578 27,067,727 29,488,911 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-24 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE PEAK PERIOD HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 24,394 15,880 47,809 408 4,835 25,090 118,417 Hemet/San Jacinto 2,488 15,208 3,096 245 757 4,204 25,998 Northwest 8,674 2,448 108,552 155 1,085 59,353 180,268 Pass Area 2,428 6,642 4,777 861 76 11,629 26,412 Southwest 24,112 32,680 46,293 442 51,199 121,926 276,652 Outside WRCOG 13,096 11,872 153,123 1,456 3,543 2,098,971 2,282,060 TOTAL 75,191 84,731 363,649 3,568 61,494 2,321,174 2,909,807 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-25 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL OFF PEAK TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,318,612 243,507 855,399 90,116 512,253 1,362,381 4,382,268 Hemet/San Jacinto 307,848 620,261 182,200 112,414 232,480 632,480 2,087,683 Northwest 514,466 58,795 2,686,245 50,935 187,731 2,945,148 6,443,318 Pass Area 125,325 101,371 126,342 322,595 27,752 586,766 1,290,151 Southwest 594,702 254,789 612,135 48,790 2,229,187 1,999,442 5,739,044 Outside WRCOG 857,986 292,176 2,897,700 380,089 960,617 114,223,362 119,611,929 TOTAL 3,718,939 1,570,899 7,360,021 1,004,939 4,150,019 121,749,579 139,554,395 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-26 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 139,109 48,317 252,879 40,263 116,636 745,260 1,342,464 Hemet/San Jacinto 68,574 47,643 92,129 35,673 67,839 402,851 714,710 Northwest 98,150 23,283 337,214 28,227 65,852 940,673 1,493,399 Pass Area 28,513 15,183 50,763 26,317 12,905 221,065 354,746 Southwest 143,010 60,883 254,955 32,890 244,955 1,155,616 1,892,308 Outside WRCOG 302,064 116,183 938,244 166,464 326,211 21,226,888 23,076,054 TOTAL 779,420 311,492 1,926,184 29,83 3EE�� ,398 24,692,353 28,873,681 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-27 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 817,753 121,802 362,911 33,093 271,714 415,042 2,022,315 Hemet/San Jacinto 161,868 374,441 65,747 46,266 116,874 172,568 937,763 Northwest 270,238 25,096 1,486,279 16,476 90,978 1,281,165 3,170,231 Pass Area 61,546 47,031 50,231 174,731 11,410 223,207 568,155 Southwest 303,367 1 1 1,492 202,017 12,889 1,405,767 465,133 2,500,666 Outside WRCOG 387,066 126,440 1,130,769 140,486 452,722 49,373,980 51,611,462 TOTAL 2,001,838 806,301 3,297,953 423,940 2,349,465 51,931,094 60,810,5 22 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-28 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 37,552 1,684 7,015 142 5,504 2,210 54,106 Hemet/San Jacinto 4,077 15,458 110 341 1,168 42 21,196 Northwest 6,276 32 64,909 10 605 20,422 92,254 Pass Area 563 684 47 7,234 2 2,659 11,190 Southwest 6,927 1,090 1,449 3 62,653 584 72,705 Outside WRCOG 2,040 166 19,074 1,704 3,185 1,683,458 1,709,627 TOTAL 57,435 19,114 92,604 9,433 73,117 1,709,376 1,961,079 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-29 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 299,738 55,092 169,871 16,381 115,948 153,204 810,234 Hemet/San Jacinto 70,174 166,706 18,278 29,966 46,159 47,597 378,880 Northwest 131,414 7,633 681,134 6,136 29,764 610,663 1,466,744 Pass Area 31,940 31,225 18,232 113,898 3,385 123,898 322,577 Southwest 104,433 36,376 55,746 2,580 484,258 98,486 781,879 Outside WRCOG 151,333 34,517 620,329 70,600 176,455 39,604,640 40,657,873 TOTAL 789,032 331,549 1,563,590 239,561 855,969 40,638,488 44,418,188 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-30 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE OFF PEAK HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 24,461 16,612 62,722 237 2,451 46,666 153,148 Hemet/San Jacinto 3,155 16,013 5,936 169 440 9,422 35,134 Northwest 8,389 2,752 116,708 85 532 92,226 220,691 Pass Area 2,763 7,248 7,069 416 50 15,937 33,483 Southwest 36,965 44,949 97,968 427 31,554 279,623 491,486 Outside WRCOG 15,482 14,869 189,285 835 2,045 2,334,396 2,556,912 TOTAL 91,214 102,442 479,690 2,170 37,070 2,778,268 3,490,855 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-31 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE TOTAL DAILY TRIPS FOR ALL PURPOSES - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 3,1 17,946 575,214 2,102,238 240,353 1,237,329 3,436,422 10,709,502 Hemet/San Jacinto 727,723 1,449,016 467,337 268,082 578,239 1,639,369 5,129,767 Northwest 1,233,645 146,222 6,338,674 141,671 471,367 6,761,699 15,093,278 Pass Area 291,468 225,299 315,464 730,869 67,702 1,392,759 3,023,562 Southwest 1,418,147 605,199 1,507,061 132,904 5,291,241 5,169,987 14,124,539 Outside WRCOG 2,066,749 712,246 6,899,073 978,711 2,443,170 265,886,766 278,986,715 TOTAL 8,855,679 3,713,196 17,629,848 2,492,590 10,089,048 284,287,001 327,067,363 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-32 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -WORK TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 512,473 167,568 892,325 141,127 401,091 2,321,469 4,436,052 Hemet/San Jacinto 240,860 182,148 300,505 123,983 237,623 1,230,272 2,315,390 Northwest 343,114 72,132 1,242,383 95,087 209,228 2,948,204 4,910,147 Pass Area 97,810 49,784 169,021 99,191 38,005 686,279 1,140,090 Southwest 489,337 213,047 855,596 102,212 899,166 3,728,179 6,287,536 Outside WRCOG 929,618 337,029 2,995,373 535,786 1,005,010 73,926,778 79,729,594 TOTAL 2,613,211 1,021,707 6,455,203 1,097,385 2,790,123 84,841,182 98,818,811 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-33 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -OTHER TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 1,880,395 276,656 795,067 71,544 612,328 807,406 4,443,395 Hemet/San Jacinto 352,830 880,778 130,769 96,181 260,151 326,742 2,047,451 Northwest 622,829 56,299 3,427,506 36,372 207,925 2,629,041 6,979,972 Pass Area 134,842 107,173 106,427 405,337 24,337 469,052 1,247,168 Southwest 668,400 250,661 415,972 25,982 3,211,934 895,954 5,468,902 Outside WRCOG 860,319 291,810 2,485,158 316,863 1,122,505 113,446,976 118,523,630 TOTAL 4,519,614 1,863,377 7,360,898 952,278 5,439,180 118,575,170 138,710,519 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-34 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -SCHOOL TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 174,447 7,678 30,955 627 25,718 8,507 247,933 Hemet/San Jacinto 17,752 72,546 411 1,316 5,281 149 97,455 Northwest 29,474 142 302,511 43 2,884 86,988 422,042 Pass Area 2,443 3,091 186 33,950 9 12,260 51,939 Southwest 31,524 4,932 6,180 10 291,076 1,879 335,600 Outside WRCOG 8,764 790 83,223 7,651 19,666 7,955,209 8,075,303 TOTAL 264,404 89,179 423,467 43,596 344,634 8,064,992 9,230,272 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-35 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY NON -HOME -BASED TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 501,776 90,820 273,360 26,410 190,907 227,284 1,310,557 Hemet/San Jacinto 110,639 282,324 26,620 46,188 73,988 68,580 608,338 Northwest 221,166 12,450 1,141,014 9,929 49,713 945,886 2,380,158 Pass Area 51,183 51,361 27,984 191,114 5,224 197,603 524,469 Southwest 167,809 58,931 85,053 3,831 806,312 142,426 1,264,363 Outside WRCOG 239,471 55,876 992,911 116,119 290,402 66,124,436 67,819,215 TOTAL 1,292,044 551,761 2,546,941 393,592 1,416,547 67,706,215 73,907,099 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 EXHIBIT J-36 VMT BY WRCOG TUMF ZONE DAILY HOME -BASED -UNIVERSITY TRIPS ONLY - 2045 NO BUILD To From Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest Pass Area Southwest Outside WRCOG TOTAL Central 48,855 32,492 110,531 645 7,286 71,756 271,565 Hemet/San Jacinto 5,642 31,221 9,033 414 1,197 13,626 61,132 Northwest 17,063 5,200 225,260 240 1,617 151,579 400,959 Pass Area 5,191 13,890 11,846 1,278 126 27,566 59,896 Southwest 61,077 77,629 144,261 870 82,752 401,549 768,138 Outside WRCOG 28,578 26,741 342,408 2,292 5,587 4,433,366 4,838,972 TOTAL 166,406 187,172 843,339 5,738 98,564 5,099,442 6,400,662 Based on RivCOM Year 2045 No -Build Scenario, November 2023 Appendix K - Residential Fee Calculation In general, the fee for the TUMF program is calculated based on the following formula: Unit Cost Assumptions x Recommended Network Improvements = TUMF Change in Residential and Non -Residential Development Applying this formula, Unit Cost Assumptions for the various eligible TUMF project types are used to estimate the overall cost to improve the TUMF Network as described in the TUMF Nexus Study. The resultant network improvement cost is then divided proportionally between various residential and non-residential development categories such that each new development type contributes its `fair share' to the program. Any change in one formula variable has a related impact on the overall TUMF fee, although it is important to note that the resultant impact to the overall fee is not necessarily directly proportional to the formula variable change due to the intricacies of the fee calculation. The residential fee was calculated by multiplying the estimated TUMF Network improvements cost attributable to mitigating the cumulative regional impacts of new development (Section 4.0) by the proportion of all regional trips that are generated by residential land uses (Section 5.3), and dividing this number by the projected increase in residential units between 2018 and 2045 (Table 2.3). To account for the difference in trip generation rates between single-family residential units and multi -family residential units, the fee value was normalized for each of these housing types by first multiplying the proposed growth in households between 2018 and 2045 by the existing proportional share of each household type, and then multiplying the resultant values by the respective trip generation rate as published in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition, 2021. The respective uniform fee values are presented in Section 6.1. Exhibit K-1 details the calculation of the uniform single-family and multi -family residential fees (and non-residential fees). On September 28, 2021, California Governor Gavin Newsome signed Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602) approving several changes to the Mitigation Fee Act, including the additional of §66016.5 to the California Government Code (CGC). §66016.5(a)(5)(A) states "A nexus study adopted after July 1, 2022, shall calculate a fee imposed on a housing development project proportionately to the square footage of proposed units of the development...." unless certain findings are made. These findings include: "(i) An explanation as to why square footage is not appropriate metric to calculate fees imposed on housing development project. (ii) An explanation that an alternative basis of calculating the fee bears a reasonable relationship between the fee charged and the burden posed by the development. WRCOG K-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 (iii) That other policies in the fee structure support smaller developments, or otherwise ensure that smaller developments are not charged disproportionate fees." To address these provisions of AB 602, WRCOG analyzed the trip generation characteristics of both single-family and multi -family housing units of various sizes to determine whether there was a variation in trip generation rates based on housing unit size substantiating that TUMF should be imposed based on the square footage of the respective housing type. The findings of the analyses for single-family and multi -family, respectively, were summarized in technical memoranda that are included as Exhibit K- 2 for single-family residential units, and Exhibit K-3 for multi -family residential units. The findings of the analysis of single-family residential units, as presented in Exhibit K-2, indicates that the trip generation rates for these units do vary by housing size, especially for units of 2,500 square feet or less. The findings also noted that variations in trip generation characteristics tended to be more closely correlated to total household population, number of children and number of workers. Figure 9 in Exhibit K-2 illustrates Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Square Footage for Single -Family housing units. The figure generally reflects a linear increase in trip generation rate as housing size increases until the unit size reaches between 2,500 and 2,900 square feet, after which the trip generation rate stabilizes at approximately 10 to 12 trips per day. The figure also indicates some clustering of trip generation rates for housing units below 1,800 square feet, and similarly for housing units between 1,800 and 2,300 square feet. Based on these findings, WRCOG has determined that the fee for single-family residential units should be adjusted in four tiers to correlate to the trip generation characteristics associated with various ranges of single-family housing sizes to demonstrate compliance with AB 602. To develop these tiers, WRCOG reviewed all single-family permits for which TUMF was assessed in the 2022/2023 Fiscal Year, which totaled 3,875 permits. These permit data indicated the square footage for these units ranged from 900 square feet to over 10,000 square feet with the majority of the units being between 1,800 square feet and 3,000 square feet. According to these data, the average square footage of these units was 2,300 square feet. WRCOG then examined the permit distribution to determine how units of various sizes should be grouped for the purposes of assessing TUMF to account for variations in the trip generation rates for single-family residential units of different sizes. An analysis of the different home sizes determined that it would be reasonable to stratify the home sizes into four tiers as presented in Table K.I. As indicated in Table K.1, approximately'/2 of all single-family permits fall into Tier 1 and Tier 2 while the remaining '/2 fall into Tier 3 and Tier 4. WRCOG K-2 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table K.1 - Single -Family Residential Unit Size Distribution in Western Riverside County (based on FY 2022/2023 Single -Family Residential Unit Permits Issued in Western Riverside County) Home Size Range (square feet) Number of Permits Percentage of Permits Less than or equal to 1,800 451 12% 1,801 to 2,300 1,409 36% 2,301 to 2,700 1,121 29% More than 2,700 894 23% Total 3,875 1007 The tiers reflecting the adjustments to the standard uniform single-family residential fee per dwelling unit (as calculated in Table 6.1) for differing ranges of single-family unit sizes are summarized in Table K.2. Consistent with §66016.5(a) (5) (A), the adjustments to the standard single-family residential fee for each tier is roughly proportional to the relative trip generation rates for the units of varying sizes described in each tier. Furthermore, the assessment of the single-family residential fee at the adjusted levels would result in a roughly proportional fee collection for all single-family residential units compared to the assessment of a standard uniform fee across all single-family residential units. This ensures that new single-family residential units continue to contribute their fair share towards the cost of mitigating the cumulative regional impact of new development on the regional transportation system thereby maintaining the program nexus outlined in this document and represented by the fee schedule presented in Table 7.1. Table K.2 - Single -Family Residential Fee Adjustments by Unit Size Adjustment Tier Housing Unit Size Range (in square feet) Standard Fee Adjustment Tier 1 Less than or equal to 1,800 80% Tier 2 1,801 to 2,300 90% Tier 3 2,301 to 2,700 100% Tier 4 More than 2,700 125% Exhibit K-3 presents the findings for multi -family housing units. For multi -family residential units, the results indicate little variation in trip generation rates across the range of multi- family residential unit sizes prompting WRCOG to determine that the fee for multi -family residential units would be most appropriately imposed uniformly across all multi -family dwelling units, regardless of their size. WRCOG K-3 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUNIF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 EXHIBIT K-1 Western Riverside County TUMF Estimate by Percent of TUMF Share Weighted by PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Rate Based on Needed Improvements to the Regional System of Highways and Arterials Dwelling Units PM Peak Hour Trip PM Peak Hour Trip Percentage of PM Residential Generation Rate Change peak Hour Trip Fee/DU 2018 2045 Change Change 9 Single Family Residential 397,407 564,898 167,491 0.99 165,816 78.6% $15,476 Multi Family Residential 157,166 247,501 90,335 0.50 45,168 21.47o $7,816 Total 554,573 812,399 257,826 210,984 100.0% Employees PM Peak Hour Trip Percentage of PM Change in SF of Non -Residential Generation Rate Peak Hour Trip Char Peak Hour Trip GFA Fee/SF of GFA 2018 2045 Change Change Industrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 0.6 45,949 15.1% 61,489,565 $2.33 Retail 73,814 86,929 13,115 1.8 23,607 7.8% 6,557,500 $11.21 6 Service 308,703 482,958 174,255 1.2 209,106 68.8% 66,735,957 $9.76 Government/Public Sector 18,569 30,640 12,071 2.1 25,349 8.3% 3,420,665 $23.07 Total 570,420 846,442 276,022 304,011 100.0% 138,203,688 Notes: -trip generation rates based on ITE Trip Generation 11 th Edition (2021) rates for weekday PM peak hour by generator trip ends -residential formula: [(TUMF cost share) (residential share of VMT) / (change in housing units)] * (percentage of trip change) - non-residential formula: [(TUMF cost share)(non-residential share of VMT) / (change in SF of GFA)] *(percentage of trip change) Calculation Inputs: residential share of daily VMT non-residential share of daily VMT total regional mitigation cost $5,283,909,000 existing obligated improvement funding $382,886,000 unfunded existing need cost $646,931,000 AX TUMF VALUE $4,244,608,000 VAX TUMF SHARE 80.317. Residential Value $3,298,060,000 Non -Residential Value $946,548,000 EXHIBIT K-2 [Single -Family] Residential Trip Generation Memorandum Fehr & Peers, November 16, 2022 WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 FEHR�PEERS Memorandum Date: November 16, 2022 To: Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG From: Mike Wallace, Eleanor Hunts, and Jason Pack — Fehr & Peers Subject: WRCOG Residential Trip Generation Contract No. 2022-65- 7400-004 / Task Order No. 2022-65-7400-004-003 OC22- 0864 This memo summarizes the goals, data and analysis, key findings, and recommendations relating to the evaluation of vehicle trip generation and residential development characteristics. Specifically, this memo is intended to inform the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) guidelines on the relationship between residential trip generation and home size (square footage) as prescribed in California Assembly Bill 602 (AB 602). This draft memo will be followed -up with a phone call to discuss the recommendations and the memo will be revised and finalized based on the call. Key Findings Questions answered through the analysis and the findings are listed below. • Is home size a key predictor of residential vehicle trip generation? Yes, for homes of 2,500 square feet or less the trips increase with the larger home size. After 2,500 square feet the number of trips stay constant with home size, all else being equal. • Are there other characteristics that have a higher predictive relationship than home size? Yes, the trip generation increases with the total household population, average number of children, and average number workers. Home size accounts for approximately 50% of the increase in home size for homes less than 2,500 square feet with the remaining 50% explained by multiple factors of the people within the home. Does the location (i.e. TUMF zone) change the relationship of home size or the other characteristics? No, the home location may influence the size, number of people, or household income, and/or the distance the trips travel, but does not influence the trips generated. Choose an item. Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 2 of 13 • Are there recommended changes to the TUMF based on the findings? If so, what is the potential impact to the TUMF collection and home owners? Yes, it is recommended that smaller homes pay a fee based on home size. The appropriate fee should be evaluated by the TUMF fee consultant to determine the potential impact to fee collected compared to the current fee expectation. Smaller homes paying less could potentially make home ownership less expensive overall compared to larger homes. Data Collection This section describes the data that were used to evaluate the trip generation. Specifically, the identification and selection of study areas, method for obtaining and results of the travel activity, and collection of residential characteristics. Study Area Selection To determine the home characteristics that might influence trip generation, representative residential neighborhoods in each of the TUMF zones were identified. The criteria used for selecting neighborhoods included the following: • Residential land use could be isolated from other uses • Minimal cut through traffic • As close to Census Blocks or Block Groups as possible to obtain demographic information • Minimal construction activity that would change the number of units • Diverse home size, household income Based on local knowledge, aerial photos, Census geography, and home information from Zillow, WRCOG staff identified a preliminary list of potential study locations in each TUMF zone. Through discussions and review of each location, Fehr & Peers narrowed down the list of study locations to 23 neighborhoods, shown on Figure 1. Travel Activity Streetlight Data from smart phones were collected at 23 residential neighborhoods shown on Figure 1 were collected for trips that started or ended within each neighborhood. This method excluded trips that cut through the neighborhood. To avoid holidays, vacations, and to reflect travel when school is in session, data from March 1It through April 30t" and September 15t through October 315t for all weekdays in 2019 were collected to represent the average vehicle trips per day for all homes within each study area. Since Streetlight Data are based on location -based services (LBS) derived from cellular phone applications, 48-hour traffic counts were conducted at eight of the 23 study area locations as a point of comparison. The eight representative count locations were selected to have at least one Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 3 of 13 location in each TUMF zone, minimize the number of roadways accessing the land use, and to allow the most accurate representation of trips associated with the residential homes without capturing cut through traffic. The eight locations where 48-hour counts were collected are shown on Figure 2. As shown on Figure 3, the 48-hour traffic count variation from day to day and the Streetlight Data average are very similar, giving confidence that the Streetlight Data for all study areas would be representative. Residential Characteristics The number of homes and characteristics for the homes within each study area were obtained from multiple sources, as summarized in Table 1. To identify outliers and the range of values for each variable that would be used to estimate the trip generation, plots of each study location by TUMF zone were developed and are summarized below with reference to the appropriate figure. • Figure 4 — Median Square Footage: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone • Figure 5 — Average Persons per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone • Figure 6 — Average Children per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone, including one study area that has very high children per household and another study area that has very low children per household • Figure 7 — Average Workers per Household: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone • Figure 8 — Median Cost per Square Foot: good distribution across study areas and within each TUMF zone Based on the review of each variable, the range across the study areas and within each TUMF zone are appropriate for use in the trip generation analysis. Trip Generation Results The Streetlight Data daily vehicle trips were used to visually display the relationship of each home characteristic for each study area and within each TUMF zone. The appropriate figure number and conclusion for the relationship are listed below. • Figure 9 — Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Square Footage: slight increase in vehicle trips as median square footage increases • Figure 10 — Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Persons per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as total number of people per household increases Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 4 of 13 110 • Figure 11 — Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Children per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as average number of children per household increases • Figure 12 — Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Workers per Household: slight increase in vehicle trips as average number of workers per household increases • Figure 13 — Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Cost per Square Foot: no clear relationship between average number of workers and trip generation In addition to visual representations of the data, statistical analysis was performed to obtain the correlation between the variables to daily vehicle trips and to determine the regression equations. Figure 16 — Correlation Matrix for All Variables: the correlation values in the green box for average and median home size of 0.7 indicate a strong positive correlation and mean as home size increases the number of trips increase. The correlation value of 0.7 results in an R-square of 0.49, meaning nearly half of the increase in trip generation is related to home size. Based on Figures 10 and 11, the relationship between trip generation appeared to be linear, with the relationship possibly changing around 2,500 square feet. The linear regression analysis of average home size was performed for all home sizes, homes 2,500 square feet or smaller, and homes larger than 2,500 square feet. The results of the analysis are summarized in Table 2. The results show for home sizes of 2,500 square feet or less, the influence of the home size (represented by the coefficient) is nearly double that when all home sizes are included in the regression. The nearly zero coefficient and very high constant for the regression of home sizes above 2.500 square feet indicate that the trip generation is nearly constant for homes above 2,500 square feet. Recommendations and Next Steps Although home characteristics other than square footage have a slight increase in trip generation, the ability to forecast or control all of the characteristics other than home square footage is very difficult. Based on the results of trip generation and discussions with WRCOG regarding the feasible size of homes being constructed in the region, WRCOG will work with the TUMF fee consultant to identify and recommend appropriate fee adjustments based on square footage. - - -ONTARIO a JURUPA VALLEY r l _ : - _ _ 19 --1-, 1 1 I. ■_1 a I ; CALIMESA % a EASTVALE _-, - _ , `, CHINO 2 I •_s .� �� _ _ • 1 a� ' 1 BEAUMONT-23� i r� f' - - - NORCO RIVERSIDE , MORENO VALLEY BANNING ` - �_ -1__ ��/ CHINOi +•: HILLS ,jai a`a , a ,'-' �^ - - - _� 1�-^_•• \° '• `a 1, ' ', ; OQNRBA L'INDA a % "� i - �_3 V-5 1 - - - - _ 1 i 1 , San �AHEIMI __ , N -. •— 4 , , ,r a - - - - Jacinto • i 1 Wildlife 1 , 1 1 /� _ + I AreaBLM tl� Ilk1 1 -� 8 • _ _1 11 r 1- �__� •-� _� , •_ 1-12•.•. a SANJACINTO • ' 1 1 _ . 1; • 1 „ PERRIS '1 1 -----" , %22 HEMET �20 13 , 1r", 1 -1 IRVINE _ _ r� 1', CANYON LAKE MENIFEE LAKE FOREST of- ' -, - , z LAKE ELSNORE . _ _, 16. 1 1 , % Cleveland NF r RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA ' MISSION ' 1 ♦- VIEJO ' '1 i' r r WILDOMAR , LAGUNA HILLS MURRIETA per ,18 N 'LAGUNA NIGUEL Study Location by TUMF Zone City Boundaries Central Hemet/San Jacinto Figure 1 Northwest . ` Pass Streetlight Data Collection Locations Southwest ON a F_1 JURUPA VALLEY „ � I � 1 � � CALIMESA ,1 , ♦ � I a a EASTVALE — r �^,1 - , • _ , — — — — —, a - t — — I • t I — , . I+ aM • CHINO . ., 1 ._9 .a RIVERSIDE ' _ I "a BEAUMONT , — — — ; NORCO 1 �- I.` BANNING CHINO 1 ti '. 1 ♦—' — MORENO VALLEY R' ` .a HILLS l ♦ • , �_.___� ' `• ' ' I—• ——_ � 1 ♦ a YORBA L'INDA a ♦ �� ". ♦ — I _ _ _ _ I ♦' 1 j a �ANAHEIMI / al CORONA •San Jacinto 1 �+ + 1 + a _ _ _ 1 I Wildlife ` % 1 . Area _ BLM SAN JACINTO + PERRIS ' ,, 1 1 _. 1• % r — — — I a I I \+ 1 1 _• � � ; � / � 1 1 � HEMET i 1 ML_20 ` 1 ♦. - »a 1 1 as _ 1 IRVINE , _ 1CANYON LAKE MENIFEE , a LAKE FOREST 1-1 LAKE ELSINORE ♦ _ �� _ — , 1 �141 ` Cleveland NF RANCHO SAN TA J ♦ MARGARITA 1 + 1 •'---— 1 — I1 MISSION— VIEJO 1 I ♦ WILDOMAR LAGUNA HILLS , I, ' •1 ''' I %� a — _ ♦` MURRIETA �18 LAGUNA NIGUEL Study Location by TUMF Zone Central Hemet/San Jacinto Northwest . ` Pass Southwest ' _ ; City Boundaries Figure 2 Traffic Count Data Collection Locations Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng - WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 7 of 13 Figure 3 - Comparison of Individual Traffic Counts and Streetlight Data Average 15000 - i0000- N a 5000 - BG Note: Red and green are the two days of manual count collection and blue are the Streetlight Data average. The BG number corresponds to the number on Figure 2. Figure 4 - Median Square Footage 3500 300 250 c v 200 m E d� N 150 100 so s 10 15 20 Location ■ Central Hemet/San Jacinto NW Pass Southwest Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng - WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 8 of 13 Figure S - Average Persons per Household 7 5 10 15 20 Location Figure 6 -Average Children per Household 3.5 2.5 0. 5 10 15 20 Location ■ Central ■ Hemet/San Jacinto ■ NW ■ Pass ■ Southwest ■ Central ■ Hemet/San Jacinto ■ NW ■ Pass ■ Southwest Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng - WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 9 of 13 Figure 7 -Average Workers per Household 0. 5 10 15 20 Location Figure 8 - Median Cost per Square Foot 40 cr W cl 30 a m E W a 20 0 U U 10 s 10 is 20 Location ■ Central ■ Hemet/San Jacinto ■ NW ■ Pass ■ southwest ■ Central ■ Hemet/San Jacinto ■ NW ■ Pass ■ Southwest Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng - WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 10 of 13 Figure 9 - Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Square Footage • Central • Hemet/San Jacinto 1_ • NW • Pass • Southwest 10 • �I • a S ~I am 0 o •• N • 6 4 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 size median Figure 10 - Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Persons per Household cep„a, Hemet/San Jacinto • NW Pass 11 Southwest 10 ir �I 9 • a ~I rn 0 N 7 6 • 5 2 3 4 5 Po pu I atio n_pe r_H H Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 11 of 13 Figure 11 - Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Children per Household Central • Hemet/San Jacinto 12 • NW • Pass • Southwest 10 n 8 F 0 N 6 4 0 1 2 3 Children —per HH Figure 12 - Daily Vehicle Trips per Average Workers per Household • Central • Hemet/San Jacinto • NW • Pass • Southwest to 2 NI n 8 ~I m .ti o N � 6 4 1 2 3 Workers_per_HH Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng - WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 12 of 13 Figure 13 - Daily Vehicle Trips per Median Cost per Square Foot 12 10 NI a $ F �I o• ry 6 4 200 300 400 Cost_ per_median_sgft Figure 14 - Correlation Matrix for All Variables 2019_Trips_HH -0.1 El 0.6 -0.3 0 Median -Household -income -0.4 NE-0.2 0 Workers_per_HH 0 0.3 0.2 -0.2 0.1 Children_per_HH 02 0.4 0.2 -0.4 0.3 Population_per_HH 0 0.2 0 -0.3 0.1 • Central Hemet/San Jacinto • NW Pass Southwest 0.4 ■ 0.5 0.4 . -0.1 0 0 1 . 0.4 bdr aVg -0.2 ■ 0.7 -0.4 M 0.1 0.3 0.1 -U.7•ml cost_per_sgft -0.4 -0.5 C.1 ■ -0.4 -0.3 -0.4 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3 cost_avg V6 0.8 ■ 0.1 0.7 0 0.2 0.2 ■ 0.6 size -median -0.3 ■ 0.8 -0.5 ■ 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.7 Location ■ -02 -0.4 -0.2 0 02 0 -0.4 -0.1 ° 0 N o� o� a4a� Corr 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 -1.0 Suzanne Peterson, Christopher Gray, and Chris Tzeng — WRCOG November 16, 2022 Page 13 of 13 Table 1: Residential Home Data and Sources Median Home Size Average Home Rooms Average Household Population Average Number of Children Average Number of Workers TUMF Zone Average Household Income Zillow Zillow ACS 5 year and 1 year ACS 5 year and 1 year ACS 5 year and 1 year WRCOG ACS 5 year and 1 year Table 2: Daily Total Vehicle Trip Regression Equation Summary All home sizes Median Home Size (KSF) 2.26 4.22 0.507 Homes 2.5 KSF or smaller Median Home Size (KSF) 4.11 1.22 0.553 Homes over 2.5 KSF Median Home Size (KSF) -0.3 11.57 0.007 Notes: KSF= Thousand Square Feet Regression Equations All home sizes. Daily total vehicle trips = 2.26 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 4.22 Homes 12.50 thousand square feet or less. Daily total vehicle trips = 4.11 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 1.22 Homes more than 2.50 thousand square feet. Daily total vehicle trips = -0.3 * Median Home Size in Thousand Square Feet + 11.57 EXHIBIT K-3 Multi -Family Residential Counts and Trip Generation Memorandum Fehr & Peers, May 12, 2023 WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 FEHRtPEERS Memorandum Date: May 12, 2023 To: Christopher Gray - WRCOG Chris Tzeng — WRCOG From: Jason D. Pack, P.E. Delia Votsch, P.E. Raymond Poss Subject: DRAFT TUMF Multifamily Residential Counts and Trip Generation Task Order No. 2022-65-7400-004-007 OC23-0955 This memorandum summarizes the goals, data collection and analyses, key findings, and recommendations regarding the evaluation of multifamily development characteristics and trip generation. This memo is intended to inform the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) guidelines on the relationship between multifamily trip generation, number of bedrooms per dwelling unit, and average size of dwelling unit. Key Findings Questions answered through the data analyses and findings are listed below. • Are the size of the dwelling unit or number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit key predictors of residential multifamily trip generation? No, the size of dwelling unit nor the number of bedrooms in a dwelling unit are key predicters of trip generation. • Are there other characteristics that have a higher predictive relationship than the number of dwelling units? No, the number of dwelling units has the highest predictive relationship. • Are there recommended changes to the TUMF program or fee calculations based on the findings? If so, what is the potential impact to the TUMF collection process and to developers? No, it is not recommended that TUMF be updated from basing multifamily development fees on number of dwelling units. 3750 University Avenue I Suite 225 1 Riverside, CA 92501 1 (951) 274-4800 1 Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG R May 12, 2023 bpiPage 2 of 14 Background Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) provides local roadway funding in part through collection of fees through the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program as part of new developments. These fees vary based on the level of impact the new development will have on traffic as determined by the characteristics of the development. The impact fee for multifamily residential developments is currently determined by the number of dwelling units (DUs). As required by new state legislature (AB-602), agencies are required to account for the size of the dwelling unit when developing impact fees. As such, Fehr & Peers was contracted to evaluate the relationship between trips generated by multifamily apartment complexes to determine if attributes other than number of dwelling units, including number bedrooms per dwelling unit and average size of dwelling unit, significantly affect trip generation. Data Collection This section describes the data used to evaluate multifamily trip generation, including the selection of locations and methods for collecting trip data, apartment characteristics, and regional Census data. Study Selection Area To evaluate the effect of dwelling unit size and number of dwelling unit bedrooms on multifamily trip generation, the following criteria were used to select the apartment complexes within Western Riverside County: • Minimum of one complex per TUMF Zone (five zones total) • Complexes not within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) • Complexes not near a college or university Through discussions and review of each location with WRCOG, Fehr & Peers narrowed the study locations to 12 multifamily apartment complexes as shown on Figure 1. Travel Activity Trips were observed at each of the 12 complexes by collecting vehicle counts during typical weekdays at each driveway over a three-day period. Trip observations for each complex were averaged over the three-day period and summarized below in Table 1 for Daily, AM Peak Period, and PM Peak Period counts. Raw data counts taken over the three-day period can be found Appendix A. Grand Chip io Hills Ci:ino Hills Statt Park iI n NG[f Miss Vie Laguna Niguel Fes\ L — Study Locations E= TUMF Zone Boundary thedral City cultural P--r— Pa lrr Figure 1 WRCOG TUMF Multifamily Trip Generation Study Sites Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 4 of 14 Table 1: Multifamily Complex Trip Observations bpi Oakwood 1 2,089 50% 50% 168 40% 60% 170 56% 44% Apartments Springbrook Park 2 841 50% 50% 68 34% 66% 69 58% 42% Apartments Vista Springs 3 1,117 49% 51% 106 36% 64% 82 55% 45% Apartments Vesada 4 Apartment 1,625 50% 50% 126 35% 65% 126 62% 38% Homes Morning Ridge 5 1,130 51% 49% 88 30% 70% 102 59% 41% Apartments Stonegate 6 952 56% 44% 67 42% 58% 81 64% 36% Apartments River's Edge 7 Apartment 1,045 50% 50% 93 34% 66% 91 57% 43% Homes Mayberry Colony 8 616 50% 50% 49 39% 61% 54 52% 48% Apartments Summit Ridge 9 777 50% 50% 67 39% 61% 57 54% 46% Apartments Riverdale 10 737 50% 50% 65 32% 68% 67 57% 43% Apartments Parkridge 11 Meadows 744 50% 50% 58 34% 66% 54 63% 37% Apartments Hunt Club 12 1,422 51% 49% 143 36% 64% 106 60% 40% Apartments Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 5of14 Residential Characteristics Apartment characteristics, listed below, were obtained from a variety of sources, including conversations with apartment leasing agents, property webpages, Census data, Zillow.com, and the Assessor's Office of Riverside County web page. • Number of dwelling units • Number of apartment styles (i.e., number of one -bedroom units, two -bedroom units, etc.) • Average size (square footage) of dwelling units • Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit • Median monthly household income by Census Tract • Average number of persons per household by Census Tract • Proximity to nearest public school The average size of each dwelling unit was calculated by dividing the total size of all combined dwelling units by the total number of dwelling units. Similarly, the average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit were calculated by dividing the total number of bedrooms by the number of dwelling units. These apartment characteristics are shown below in Table 2. Specific information related to each apartment complex are provided in Appendix B. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 6 of 14 Table 2: Apartment Characteristics bpi 1 Oakwood 241 1,040 3.0 $65,240 3.92 0.2 Apartments 2 Springbrook Park 112 955 2.0 $77,148 3.6 0.5 Apartments 3 Vista Springs 212 822 1.5 $74,333 3.3 0.7 Apartments 4 Vesada Apartment 261 938 1.7 $79,199 4.53 1.1 Homes 5 Morning Ridge 200 850 1.6 $63,279 2.73 0.6 Apartments 6 Stonegate 160 802 1.5 $68,250 3.14 0.7 Apartments 7 River's Edge 184 918 1.5 $78,222 3.74 0.4 Apartment Homes 8 Mayberry Colony 89 896 1.6 $51,653 3.71 0.7 Apartments 9 Summit Ridge 80 529 2.5 $43,100 3.47 0.3 Apartments 10 Riverdale 96 1,015 2.6 $87,532 4.33 0.3 Apartments Parkridge 11 Meadows 88 771 2.0 $74,886 3.53 0.1 Apartments 12 Hunt Club 203 962 2.0 $58,200 4.5 0.8 Apartments Sources: Fehr & Peers (2023), U.S. Census Bureau 5-Year American Community Survey (2016-2021), Zillow.com (2023), Riverside County Assessor (2023) Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 7 of 14 Trip Generation Analysis Using the data described above, a statistical analysis, including a regression and correlation assessment, was performed to evaluate if a statistically significant relationship exists between multifamily trip generation and the following variables to determine if an update to the development fee calculation was justified. • Number of dwelling units • Average size of dwelling units • Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit • Median monthly income • Average number of persons per household • Proximity to nearest public school Correlation Analysis A correlation analysis was also performed to determine if a one-to-one relationship exists between daily trip generation and an apartment characteristic listed above. Figure 2, below, shows the results of the correlation analysis, with darker green cells representing a stronger, positive correlation. R The correlation analysis indicates that daily trip generation has a strong, positive correlation with the number of dwelling units and a moderate, positive correlation with average size of dwelling unit. All other variables are indicated to have a weak or very weak positive correlation with trip generation. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 8 of 14 Figure 2: Trip Generation Correlation Matrix Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) Regression Analysis bpi An ordinary least squares regression at a 95% confidence interval was performed on the above variables against daily trip generation to screen out variables that yielded statistically insignificant results. The results of the first regression are shown in Table 3. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 9 of 14 Table 3: Regression Results Number of dwelling units <0.05 Yes Average size (square footage) of >0.05 No dwelling units Average number of bedrooms per <0.05 Yes dwelling unit Median monthly household >0.05 No income Average number of persons per >0.05 No household Proximity to nearest public school >0.05 No R VA Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) 1. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant. A subsequent regression was run with the least statistically significant (highest P-value) variable removed. This process was repeated until all remaining variables yielded statistically significant P- values (less than 0.05), resulting in the number of dwelling units and average size of dwelling unit as the remaining variables. The P-Values for these variables are shown below in Table 4. Table 4: Filtered Regression Results Number of dwelling units 4.8x10-01 Yes Average size (square footage) of 0.0002 Yes dwelling units Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) 1. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant. The regression analysis indicates that number of dwelling units and average size of dwelling unit are statistically significant predictors of multifamily trip generation. To validate these results, a forward stepwise regression was also completed. A forward stepwise regression is completed by beginning with no variables in the model, and then adding them one at a time based on which has the smallest p-value when tested one at a time. This isolates any possible relationships between the variables and further helps confirm if the vehicle trip rate has a statistically valid correlation to the variables tested. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 12, 2023 Page 10 of 14 Table 5: Forward Stepwise Regression Results M Average size (square footage) of dwelling units 4 0.377 Yes Average number of bedrooms per dwelling unit 1 0.0008 No Median monthly household income 3 0.249 Yes Average number of persons per household 5 0.509 Yes Proximity to nearest public school 2 0.0239 No Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) 1. Relationship rank indicates which variable has the strongest correlation with daily vehicle trip rate. 2. P-Values < 0.05 are considered statistically significant. P-Values > 0.05 are considered statistically insignificant. As noted in Table 5, the variables with the strongest relationship to daily vehicle trip rate (number of bedrooms and distance to nearest school) are not statistically significant. Trip Generation Results In both the regression and correlation analyses, the number of dwelling units was found to be the strongest predictor of daily trip generation. All other variables had positive but weaker correlations to daily trip generation, and none were found to be statistically significant predictors of multifamily daily trip generation under both regression analyses. Table 6: Summary of Trip Generation Results Number of Dwelling Units 1 Yes Yes Average number of bedrooms 2 Yes No per dwelling unit Proximity to nearest public school 3 No No Average size (square footage) of 4 No Yes dwelling units Average number of persons per 5 No Yes household Median monthly household 6 No Yes income Source: Fehr & Peers (2023) 1. Overall relationship rank indicates which variable has the strongest relationship with daily vehicle trip rate under the correlation and forward stepwise regression analyses. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG ri May 12, 2023 bpiPage 11 of 14 Recommendations and Next Steps The results of this statistical analysis indicate that the best predictor of trip generation for multifamily apartment complexes in Western Riverside County is the number of dwelling units (the current basis for development fee calculation). Although other variables showed a positive correlation with trip generation, none yielded as strong a relationship. Based on this statistical analysis, it is not recommended that these other variables be incorporated into the TUMF program. Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 2, 2023 Page 11 of 13 Appendix A: Three -Day Trip Observations A021323 Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AinnTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS79 Southern Dwy east of Perris. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 1 0 1 0 0 2 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:00 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 0 2 0 0 0 2 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 2 2 0 0 0 4 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:00 3 1 0 0 0 4 7:15 0 3 0 0 0 3 19:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 2 1 0 0 0 3 21:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 1 1 0 0 0 2 22:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 11:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 17 5 0 0 0 22 TOTAL 1 29 6 1 0 0 1 36 AM PEAK HOUR 9:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR IAM 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 7 PEAK VOLUME 9 2-AXLE TRUCKS 3-AXLE TRUCKS 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5-AXLE + TRUCKS 46 11 1 0 0 58 79.3 % 19.0 % 1.7 % 0.0 % 0.0 % 100.0 AM PEAK 1 3 0 0 0 4 PM PEAK 5 0 0 0 0 5 A13123 Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS79 Southern Dwy east of Perris. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 1 0 1 0 0 2 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1:00 1 13:00 0 1 0 0 0 1 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 0 2 0 0 0 2 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 1 1 0 0 0 2 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 3 1 0 0 0 4 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 1 17:00 2 0 0 0 0 Z. 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:00 19:00 2 1 0 0 0 3 7:15 0 3 0 0 0 3 19:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 2 1 0 0 0 3 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 10:00 2 22:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 19 5 0 0 0 24 TOTAL 1 32 6 1 0 0 39 AM PEAK HOUR 9:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 7 AM PEAK VOLUME 10 51 11 1 0 0 63 TRUCKS 81.0 r 17.5 r 1.6 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 4 TRUCKS PM PEAK 6 0 0 0 0 6 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS80 Northern Dwy east of Perris. 0:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 12:00 35 0 0 0 0 35 0:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 12:15 42 1 0 0 0 43 0:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 12:30 36 1 1 0 0 38 0:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 12:45 58 0 0 0 0 58 16 0 0 0 0 16 44 1:00 13:00 44 0 0 0 0 1:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:15 39 1 0 0 0 40 1:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:30 38 0 0 0 0 38 1:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 13:45 55 0 0 0 0 55 7 0 0 0 0 7 14:00 44 2:00 44 0 0 0 0 2:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:15 65 0 0 0 0 65 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 51 0 0 0 0 51 2:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 14:45 63 0 0 0 0 63 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:00 53 3:00 53 0 0 0 0 3:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:15 64 2 0 0 0 66 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 66 2 0 0 0 68 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 75 1 0 0 0 76 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:00 73 4:00 73 0 0 0 0 4:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 16:15 67 0 0 0 0 67 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 62 0 0 0 0 62 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 80 0 0 0 0 80 8 0 0 0 0 8 17:00 48 2 0 0 0 50 5:00 0 5:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:15 68 0 0 0 0 68 5:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:30 53 0 0 0 0 53 5:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 17:45 60 0 0 0 0 60 6:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 18:00 79 0 0 0 0 79 6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:15 70 0 0 0 0 70 6:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:30 60 0 0 0 0 60 6:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:45 54 0 0 0 0 54 7:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:00 53 0 0 0 0 53 7:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 19:15 43 0 0 0 0 43 7:30 48 0 0 0 0 48 19:30 38 0 0 0 0 38 7:45 70 0 0 0 0 70 19:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 8:00 52 0 0 0 0 52 20:00 48 0 0 0 0 48 8:15 27 0 0 0 0 27 20:15 38 0 0 0 0 38 8:30 52 0 0 0 0 52 20:30 38 0 0 0 0 38 8:45 36 0 1 0 0 37 20:45 32 0 0 0 0 32 9:00 21 1 0 0 0 22 21:00 47 0 0 0 0 47 9:15 19 1 0 0 0 20 21:15 36 0 0 0 0 36 9:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 21:30 35 0 0 0 0 35 9:45 29 1 0 0 0 30 21:45 25 0 0 0 0 25 10:00 28 1 0 0 0 29 22:00 35 0 0 0 0 35 10:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 22:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 10:30 24 0 0 0 0 24 22:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 10:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 22:45 21 0 0 0 0 21 31 0 0 0 0 16 11:00 31 23:00 16 0 0 0 0 11:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 23:15 30 0 0 0 0 30 11:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 11:45 29 3 0 0 0 32 23:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 TOTAL 815 7 1 0 0 823 TOTAL 2,246 10 1 0 0 2,257 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 201 AM PEAK VOLUME 284 3,061 17 2 0 0 3,080 TRUCKS 99.4 r 0.6 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 201 1 0 0 0 0 201 TRUCKS PM PEAK 282 0 0 0 0 282 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 1 - Oakwood Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS80 Northern Dwy east of Perris. 0:00 5 1 0 0 0 6 12:00 59 1 0 0 0 60 0:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 12:15 38 2 0 0 0 40 0:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 12:30 34 0 0 0 0 34 0:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 12:45 32 1 0 0 0 33 5 1 0 0 0 6 1:00 13:00 40 0 0 0 0 40 1:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 13:15 47 0 1 0 0 48 1:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:30 51 1 0 0 0 52 1:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:45 46 0 0 0 0 46 2:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:00 60 0 0 0 0 60 2:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:15 49 0 0 0 0 49 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 52 0 0 0 0 52 2:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:45 48 0 0 0 0 48 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:00 57 0 0 0 0 57 3:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 15:15 56 0 0 0 0 56 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 61 1 0 0 0 62 3:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 15:45 37 0 0 0 0 37 14 0 0 0 0 14 71 4:00 16:00 71 0 0 0 0 4:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:15 39 0 0 0 0 39 4:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 16:30 53 1 0 0 0 54 4:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:45 53 0 0 0 0 53 15 0 0 0 0 15 17:00 5:00 63 0 0 0 0 63 5:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 17:15 46 1 0 0 0 47 5:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 17:30 48 0 0 0 0 48 5:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 17:45 42 0 0 0 0 42 6:00 28 0 0 0 0 28 18:00 48 0 0 0 0 48 6:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 18:15 57 0 0 0 0 57 6:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 18:30 30 0 0 0 0 30 6:45 38 0 0 0 0 38 18:45 33 0 0 0 0 33 48 0 0 0 0 48 19:00 41 0 0 0 0 41 7:00 7:15 79 0 0 0 0 79 19:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 7:30 82 0 0 0 0 82 19:30 32 1 0 0 0 33 7:45 78 0 0 0 0 78 19:45 33 0 0 0 0 33 57 0 0 0 0 57 20:00 8:00 33 0 0 0 0 33 8:15 61 0 0 0 0 61 20:15 31 0 0 0 0 31 8:30 36 1 0 0 0 37 20:30 32 1 0 0 0 33 8:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 20:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 27 0 0 0 0 27 29 0 0 0 0 29 9:00 21:00 9:15 33 0 0 0 0 33 21:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 9:30 27 2 1 0 0 30 21:30 28 0 0 0 0 28 9:45 44 1 0 0 0 45 21:45 24 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 28 1 0 0 0 29 22:00 19 0 0 0 0 19 10:15 39 1 0 0 0 40 22:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 10:30 27 2 0 0 0 29 22:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 10:45 32 0 0 0 0 32 22:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 36 0 0 0 0 36 23:00 11:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 11:15 37 0 0 0 0 37 23:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 11:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 23:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 11:45 39 1 0 0 0 40 23:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 TOTAL 1,208 11 1 0 0 1,220 TOTAL 1,833 10 1 0 0 1,844 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 296 AM PEAK VOLUME 226 3,041 21 2 0 0 3,064 TRUCKS 99.2r 0.7 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 296 1 0 0 0 0 296 TRUCKS PM PEAK 216 1 0 0 0 217 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS75 Eastern Dwy south of Orange. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 12:45 13:00 7 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 10 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 8 2:00 110 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:15 6 1 0 0 0 7 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 17 1 0 0 0 18 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 3:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:45 22 0 0 0 0 22 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 9 2 0 0 0 11 4:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:00 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 5:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:45 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 6:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:00 6:15 1 3 0 0 0 4 18: 15 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:45 2 1 0 0 0 3 18:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:00 4 2 0 0 0 6 19:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:15 4 3 0 0 0 7 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:45 2 1 0 0 0 3 21:45 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 10:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:00 10:15 6 1 0 0 0 7 22:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:45 23:00 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 11:00 4 1 0 0 0 5 11:15 2 0 1 0 0 3 23:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 10 1 1 0 0 12 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 128 13 2 0 0 143 TOTAL 1 385 5 0 0 0 390 AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 29 AM PEAK VOLUME 59 513 18 2 0 0 533 TRUCKS 96.2% 3.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0 % TRUCKS AM PEAK 29 0 0 0 0 29 TRUCKS PM PEAK 50 0 0 0 0 50 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS75 Eastern Dwy south of Orange. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 6 2 1 0 0 9 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 12:45 13:00 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 2:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 14:45 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 15:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 15:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 15 4:00 16:00 15 0 0 0 0 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 4:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 4 16:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 5:00 4 0 0 0 0 17:00 5 0 0 0 0 5:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 5:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 5 17:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 5 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 18:00 5 0 0 0 0 6:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 Is: 15 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 18:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 10 7:00 5 0 0 0 0 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 7:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:30 19 0 1 0 0 20 19:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 7 19:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 8:00 7 0 0 0 0 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 8:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 4 0 1 0 0 5 20:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 3 20:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 5 9:00 3 0 0 0 0 21:00 5 0 0 0 0 9:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 21:45 22:00 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 10:00 5 0 0 0 0 10:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:00 3 0 0 0 0 11:00 11 1 0 0 0 12 3 11:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 4 1 0 0 0 5 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 234 2 2 0 0 238 TOTAL 1 306 3 1 0 0 310 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 58 AM PEAK VOLUME 50 540 5 3 0 0 548 TRUCKS 98.5 r 0.9 r 0.5 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 57 0 1 0 0 58 TRUCKS PM PEAK 50 0 0 0 0 50 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS76 Western Dwy south of Orange. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 7 1 0 0 0 8 0:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 12 2 1 0 0 15 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 12:45 13:00 6 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 11 1 0 0 0 12 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 13:45 9 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 13 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 14:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 12 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 12 0 0 0 0 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 14 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 13 1 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 4:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 16:45 17:00 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 16 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 5:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:30 24 0 0 0 0 24 5:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 5 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 20 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 18:00 20 0 0 0 0 6:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 Is: 15 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 18:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 18 7:00 2 0 0 0 0 19:00 18 0 0 0 0 7:15 2 0 1 0 0 3 19:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 9 19:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 11 8:00 9 0 0 0 0 20:00 11 0 0 0 0 8:15 6 0 1 0 0 7 20:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 8:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 10 20:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 14 9:00 10 0 0 0 0 21:00 14 0 0 0 0 9:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 9:30 3 1 0 0 0 4 21:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 11 21:45 22:00 15 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 5 10:00 10 1 0 0 0 10:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 10:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 3 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 4 11,00 3 0 0 0 0 23:00 4 0 0 0 0 11:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 2 1 0 0 0 3 23:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 11:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 TOTAL 174 3 2 0 0 179 TOTAL 1 531 5 1 0 0 537 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 41 AM PEAK VOLUME 76 705 8 3 0 0 716 TRUCKS 98.5 r 1.1 r 0.4 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 40 0 1 0 0 41 TRUCKS PM PEAK 70 0 0 0 0 70 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 2 - Springbrook Park Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS76 Western Dwy south of Orange. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 6 0 1 0 0 7 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:3 00 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 6 1 0 0 0 7 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 11 1 0 0 0 12 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 2:00 1 14:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 11 2 0 0 0 13 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 15:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 15:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:00 9 1 0 0_ 0 10. 4:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 16:15 8 1 0 0 0 9 4:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:30 8 1 0 0 0 9 4:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 5:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 5:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 5:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:15 5 3 0 0 0 8 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 7 3 0 0 0 10 7:00 19:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:15 17 3 0 0 0 20 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:45 24 0 0 0 0 24 19:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 20:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:45 1 1 0 0 0 2 21:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 22:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 10:15 12 2 0 0 0 14 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 5 0 1 0 0 6 23:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:45 8 1 0 0 0 9 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 314 14 1 0 0 329 TOTAL 1 384 7 1 0 0 392 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1: 15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 78 AM PEAK VOLUME 56 698 21 2 0 0 721 TRUCKS 96.8 % 2.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 75 1 3 0 0 0 78 TRUCKS PM PEAK 35 3 0 0 0 38 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS77 Dwy east of Clark 0:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 0:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 ::45 5 0 0 0 0 5 12:45 11 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 1:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:00 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 6 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 13 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1545 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:45 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 14 5:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:00 5:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 6:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 6:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 7:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 8:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 9:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 9:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:45 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 10:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 22:00 10:15 4 1 0 0 0 5 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 3 1 0 0 0 4 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 22:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 4 11:00 23:00 4 0 0 0 0 11:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 TOTAL 169 2 0 0 0 171 TOTAL 1 438 0 1 0 0 439 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM 1AM PEAK HOUR 4:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 54 AM PEAK VOLUME 53 607 2 1 0 0 610 TRUCKS 99.5r 0.3 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 54 0 0 0 0 54 TRUCKS PM PEAK 53 0 0 0 0 53 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS77 Dwy east of Clark 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 ::45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 10 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:00 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13: IS 10 0 0 0 0 10 1:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:30 16 0 1 0 0 17 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 19 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14: IS 19 0 0 0 0 19 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 12 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:00 3:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 8 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 5:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:00 5:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 17:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 5:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 18:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 18: 15 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:45 19 1 0 0 0 20 7:00 23 0 0 0 0 23 19:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:15 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 19:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 19:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:00 31 0 0 0 0 31 20:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 20:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 9 20:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 9:00 9 0 0 0 0 21:00 5 0 0 0 0 9:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 14 21:45 22:00 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 6 10:00 13 1 0 0 0 10:15 4 1 0 0 0 5 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 6 1 0 0 0 7 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 11:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 1 11:15 6 1 0 0 0 7 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 398 4 0 0 0 402 TOTAL 1 418 2 1 0 0 421 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM 1AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 115 AM PEAK VOLUME 73 816 6 1 0 0 823 TRUCKS 99.1 r 0.7 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 115 0 0 0 0 115 TRUCKS PM PEAK 42 0 0 0 0 42 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS78 Dwy north of Box Springs 0:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 12:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 17 1 1 0 0 19 ::45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 12:45 12 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 14 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 13:00 1:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:15 16 0 1 0 0 17 1:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:30 9 1 0 0 0 10 1:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 13:45 8 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 20 2:00 3 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:15 22 0 0 0 0 22 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 15 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1545 16:00 13 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 19 4:00 3 0 0 0 0 4:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:00 5:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 23 0 0 0 0 23 5:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:45 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 19 6:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:00 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 6:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 6:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:45 13 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 23 7:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:00 7:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 19:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 7:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:45 34 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 15 8:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:00 8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 8:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:45 21 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 16 9:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:00 9:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 9:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:45 12 1 0 0 0 13 21:45 7 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11 10:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 22:00 10:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:30 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 10:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 13 23:00 -11:00 13 0 0 0 0 7 ._ 0 0 0 0 7 11:15 13 1 0 0 0 14 23:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 13 1 0 0 0 14 23:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 TOTAL 285 7 0 0 0 292 TOTAL 1 748 4 2 0 0 754 AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 7:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 60 AM PEAK VOLUME 92 1,033 11 2 0 0 1,046 TRUCKS 98.8 r 1.1 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 60 1 0 0 0 0 60 TRUCKS PM PEAK 83 0 0 0 0 83 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 3 - Vista Springs Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS78 Dwy north of Box Springs 0:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 0:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 12:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 ::45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 17 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 17 15 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 13:30 8 1 1 0 0 10 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 2:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 11 0 1 0 0 12 2:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:00 — - — - - ...................-- 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 4:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 16:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:45 19 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 14 5:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:00 5:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 5:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 5:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18: 15 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 6:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 18:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:00 29 0 0 0 0 29 19:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 7:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 19:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 8:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 21:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:45 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 10:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:00 10:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 14 2 0 0 0 16 22:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:45 8 1 0 0 0 9 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 11:00 -......- 7 0 0 0 0 7 1 11:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 398 4 0 0 0 402 TOTAL 1 466 2 2 0 0 470 AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 4:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 88 AM PEAK VOLUME 69 864 6 2 0 0 872 TRUCKS 99.1 r 0.7 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 88 0 0 0 0 88 TRUCKS PM PEAK 69 0 0 0 0 69 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS73 Southern Dwy east of Country Village. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 16:00 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:45 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:45 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 0 AM PEAK VOLUME 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRUCKS PM PEAK 0 0 0 0 0 0 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS73 Southern Dwy east of Country Village. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 4 1 0 0 0 5 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 3:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 15:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 5:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 6:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 7:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 7:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 9:00 2 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 69 0 0 0 0 69 TOTAL 1 78 1 0 0 0 79 AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 13 AM PEAK VOLUME 13 147 1 0 0 0 148 TRUCKS 99.3 r 0.7 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 9 1 0 0 0 0 9 TRUCKS PM PEAK 7 0 0 0 0 7 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS74 Northern Dwy east of Country Village. 0 70:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 12:00 33 0 0 0 0 33 5 10 0 0 0 0 10 12:15 33 1 0 0 0 34 5 0 0 0 0 5 12:30 36 1 0 0 0 37 5 4 0 0 0 0 4 7 12:45 13:00 37 34 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 34 1:00 7 0 0 0 0 1:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 13:15 36 0 0 0 0 36 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 1:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 6 13:45 14:00 34 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 33 2:00 6 0 0 0 0 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:15 26 2 0 0 0 28 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 34 0 0 0 0 34 2:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 14:45 39 0 0 0 0 39 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:00 49 0 0 0 0 49 3:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:15 39 0 0 0 0 39 3:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 15:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 3:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 15:45 65 0 0 0 0 65 4:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:00 49 0 0 0 0 49 4:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:15 59 1 0 0 0 60 4:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:30 74 0 0 0 0 74 4:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 16:45 52 0 0 0 0 52 5:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:00 47 0 0 0 0 47 5:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:15 51 0 0 0 0 51 5:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 50 0 0 0 0 50 5:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:45 55 0 0 0 0 55 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 18:00 60 0 0 0 0 60 6:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 18: 15 52 0 0 0 0 52 6:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 18:30 44 0 0 0 0 44 6:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 18:45 51 2 0 0 0 53 7:00 19 0 0 0 0 19 19:00 42 0 0 0 0 42 7:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:15 26 0 0 0 0 26 7:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:30 46 0 0 0 0 46 7:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 19:45 42 0 0 0 0 42 8:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 20:00 44 0 0 0 0 44 8:15 39 0 0 0 0 39 20:15 35 0 0 0 0 35 8:30 28 0 0 0 0 28 20:30 29 0 0 0 0 29 8:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 22 20:45 33 0 0 0 0 33 31 9:00 22 0 0 0 0 21:00 31 0 0 0 0 9:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 21:15 27 0 0 0 0 27 9:30 20 2 0 0 0 22 21:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 9:45 24 2 0 0 0 26 20 21:45 22:00 27 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 22 10:00 19 1 0 0 0 10:15 17 1 0 0 0 18 22:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 10:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 22:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 10:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 22:45 22 0 0 0 0 22 23:00 -11:00 31 0 1 0 0 32 12 0 .... _ 0 0 0... 12 11:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 23:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 11:30 21 1 0 0 0 22 23:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 11:45 23 2 0 0 0 25 23:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 TOTAL 629 9 1 0 0 639 TOTAL 1 1,767 9 1 0 0 1,777 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 131 AM PEAK VOLUME 248 2,396 18 2 0 0 2,416 TRUCKS 99.2r 0.7 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 131 0 0 0 0 131 TRUCKS PM PEAK 234 1 0 0 0 235 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 4 - Vesada Aparment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS74 Northern Dwy east of Country Village. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 27 2 0 0 0 29 0:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:15 33 0 0 0 0 33 0:3 22 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 34 2 0 0 0 36 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:45 28 1 0 0 0 29 2 0 0 0 0 1:00 2 13:00 29 0 1 0 0 30 1:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:15 44 0 0 0 0 44 1:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:30 38 1 0 0 0 39 1:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:45 29 1 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 14:00 24 2 0 0 0 26 2:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 14:15 22 0 0 0 0 22 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 25 1 0 0 0 26 2:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:00 15:00 31 0 0 0 0 31 3:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 15:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 3:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 15:30 29 0 0 0 0 29 3:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:45 29 0 0 0 0 29 17 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 4:00 17 16:00 26 4:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 4:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:30 29 1 0 0 0 30 4:45 20 2 0 0 0 22 16:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 19 1 0 0 0 20 5:00 17:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 5:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:15 34 0 0 0 0 34 5:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 17:30 38 0 0 0 0 38 5:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 17:45 36 0 0 0 0 36 6:00 18 0 0 0 0 18 18:00 37 0 0 0 0 37 6:15 38 0 0 0 0 38 18:15 41 0 0 0 0 41 6:30 34 0 0 0 0 34 18:30 31 0 0 0 0 31 6:45 46 0 0 0 0 46 18:45 21 0 0 0 0 21 46 0 0 0 0 46 31 0 0 0 0 7:00 19:00 31 7:15 82 0 0 0 0 82 19:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 7:30 56 0 0 0 0 56 19:30 40 1 0 0 0 41 7:45 52 0 0 0 0 52 19:45 32 0 0 0 0 32 48 0 0 0 0 8:00 48 20:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 8:15 59 1 0 0 0 60 20:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 8:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 8:45 32 1 0 0 0 33 20:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 9:00 27 0 0 0 0 27 21:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 9:15 26 0 0 0 0 26 21:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 9:30 31 1 0 0 0 32 21:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 9:45 36 0 0 0 0 36 21:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 28 0 0 0 0 10:00 28 22:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 10:15 32 1 0 0 0 33 22:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 10:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 10:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 _.29 0 0 0 0 11:00 29 23:00 5 0- 0- 0- 0 5. 11:15 25 0 0 0 0 25 23:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 11:30 32 0 1 0 0 33 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 11:45 33 2 0 0 0 35 23:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 1 1,080 9 1 0 0 1,090 TOTAL 1,205 12 1 0 0 1 1,218 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 5:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 238 AM PEAK VOLUME 152 2,285 21 2 0 0 2,308 TRUCKS 99.0 % 0.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 238 1 0 0 0 0 238 TRUCKS PM PEAK 138 0 0 0 0 138 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS84 Northern Dwy east of Milky Way. 0:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1:00 1 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 5 1 0 0 0 6 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 7 1 0 0 0 8 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 15:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 8 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 8 5:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 7:00 19:00 6 7:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 5 0 0 1 0 6 19:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 8:00 8 20:00 9 8:15 4 1 0 0 0 5 20:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 8:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 0 0 0 9:00 21:00 8 9:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 22:00 4 10:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 4 11:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 101 1 0 1 0 103 TOTAL 1 367 2 0 0 0 369 AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 24 AM PEAK VOLUME 53 468 3 0 1 0 472 TRUCKS 99.2r 0.6 r 0.0 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 23 1 1 0 0 0 24 TRUCKS PM PEAK 52 0 0 0 0 52 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS84 Northern Dwy east of Milky Way. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 11 1 0 0 0 12 0:3 00 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 1:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 4 2 0 0 0 6 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 8 1 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 15:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 19 0 0 0 0 19 4:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 5:00 2 17:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 5:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:15 5 1 0 0 0 6 5:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 5:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 17:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 18:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:00 19:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 7:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 19:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 19:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 13 0 0 0 0 8:00 13 20:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:00 21:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 4 1 0 0 0 5 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 7 0 0 0 0 _ 7 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:00 5 1 0 0 0 6 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 274 4 0 0 0 278 TOTAL 1 282 6 0 0 0 288 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 62 AM PEAK VOLUME 42 556 10 0 0 0 566 TRUCKS 98.2 r 1.8 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 62 1 0 0 0 0 62 TRUCKS PM PEAK 38 0 0 0 0 38 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS85 Middle Dwy east of Milky Way. 0 70:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 5 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 13:00 12 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 12 13 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 12 1 0 0 0 13 1:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13:45 8 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 12 2:00 2 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 14:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 15 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 15 0 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 18 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 18 0 0 0 0 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 4:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 16:45 18 1 0 0 0 19 20 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 17:00 20 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 17 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 18:00 6:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 18: 15 30 0 0 0 0 30 6:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 18:45 18 23 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 18 26 7:00 3 0 0 0 0 19:00 7:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 19:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 7:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 19:45 20:00 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11 8:00 5 0 0 0 0 8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 8:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 2 20:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 7 9:00 2 0 0 0 0 21:00 7 0 0 0 0 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 21:45 22:00 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 10:00 5 0 0 0 0 10:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 23:00 7 0 0 0 0 11:00 6 0 0 0 0.-. 7. 11:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 11 1 0 0 0 12 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 167 1 0 0 0 168 TOTAL 1 545 7 0 0 0 552 AM PEAK HOUR 10:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 6:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 89 712 8 0 0 0 720 TRUCKS 98.9% 1.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 31 0 0 0 0 31 TRUCKS PM PEAK 75 1 0 0 0 76 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS85 Middle Dwy east of Milky Way. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 0:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 12:45 13:00 14 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 7 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 9 2 0 0 0 11 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 6 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 9 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 10 1 0 0 0 11 2:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 12 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 8 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 17 4:00 16:00 16 1 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:30 5 2 0 0 0 7 16:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 16:45 17:00 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 5:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:30 8 2 0 0 0 10 17:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:45 7 2 0 0 0 9 17:45 12 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9 6:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:00 6:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 19:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 19:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:30 27 3 0 0 0 30 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 19:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 8:00 25 0 0 0 0 25 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 20:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 6 9:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:00 6 0 0 0 0 9:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 5 21:45 22:00 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 10:00 5 0 0 0 0 10:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 22:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 4 0 0 0 0 11:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 4 11:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 295 9 0 0 0 304 TOTAL 1 342 8 0 0 0 350 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 85 AM PEAK VOLUME 47 637 17 0 0 0 654 TRUCKS 974% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 82 3 0 0 0 85 TRUCKS PM PEAK 47 0 0 0 0 47 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS86 Southern Dwy east of Milky Way. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 7 1 0 0 0 8 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 13:00 7 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 9 2 0 0 0 11 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 13 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 7 1 0 0 0 8 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 11 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 7 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 12 1 0 0 0 13 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 5:00 2 0 0 0 0 17:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 9 1 0 0 0 10 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 11 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 6:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:30 1 3 0 0 0 4 19:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 8:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 20:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 8:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 20:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 9 9:00 5 0 0 0 0 21:00 9 0 0 0 0 9:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:45 3 1 0 0 0 4 21:45 22:00 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 10:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 10:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 10:45 2 1 0 0 0 3 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 11:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 11:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 109 5 0 0 0 114 TOTAL 1 398 11 0 0 0 409 AM PEAK HOUR 8:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 23 AM PEAK VOLUME 50 507 16 0 0 0 523 TRUCKS 96.9 r 3.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 23 0 0 0 0 23 TRUCKS PM PEAK 49 1 0 0 0 50 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 5 - Morning Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS86 Southern Dwy east of Milky Way. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1:00 2 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 1 0 0 0 5 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 5 1 0 0 0 6 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 16:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 6 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 6 17:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 5:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 17:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 17:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 5:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 19:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 19:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 7 20:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:15 7 0 0 1 0 8 20:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:00 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 21:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 208 0 0 1 0 209 TOTAL 247 2 0 0 0 249 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 41 455 2 0 1 0 458 TRUCKS 99.3 r 0.4 r 0.0 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 38 1 0 0 1 0 39 TRUCKS PM PEAK 41 0 0 0 0 41 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS71 Northern dwy west of Doolittle 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 1:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 1:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:45 10 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 16 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 10 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 17 3:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:00 3:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 3:45 1 1 0 0 0 2 1545 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 4:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 5:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:15 22 0 0 0 0 22 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:00 20 0 0 0 0 20 6:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 18: 15 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 6:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 7:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 7:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:15 6 1 0 0 0 7 7:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 19:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 8:30 12 1 0 0 0 13 20:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 8:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 9:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 9:45 7 1 0 0 0 8 21:45 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 8 10:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:00 10:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 7 0. 0 0 0 11:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 7 11:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 183 4 0 0 0 187 TOTAL 1 570 1 0 0 0 571 AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM 1AM PEAK HOUR 5:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 46 AM PEAK VOLUME 76 753 5 0 0 0 758 TRUCKS 99.3 r 0.7 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 45 1 1 0 0 0 46 TRUCKS PM PEAK 72 0 0 0 0 72 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS71 Northern dwy west of Doolittle 0:0072r 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:150 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 0:300 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 13 1 0 0 0 14 0:45 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 6 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13: IS 12 0 0 0 0 12 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 14 1 0 0 0 15 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 20 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14: IS 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 6 1 0 0 0 7 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 16:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 17:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 5:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 17:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 18:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 19:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 7:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 8:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:45 8 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 20:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 4 9:00 11 21:00 4 0 0 0 0 9:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:30 7 1 0 0 0 8 21:30 3 1 0 0 0 4 9:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 8 21:45 22:00 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4 10:00 7 1 0 0 0 10:15 5 1 0 0 0 6 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 5 1 0 0 0 6 22:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:45 10 2 0 0 0 12 6 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 11:00 5 1 0 0 0 23:00 6 0 0 0 0 11:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 7 1 0 0 0 8 23:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 309 8 1 0 0 318 TOTAL 1 401 5 0 0 0 406 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM 1AM PEAK HOUR 1:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 68 AM PEAK VOLUME 59 710 13 1 0 0 724 TRUCKS 98.1 r 1.8 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 68 1 0 0 0 0 68 TRUCKS PM PEAK 47 0 0 0 0 47 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS72 Southern dwy west of Doolittle 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 19 1 0 0 0 20 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 16 1 0 0 0 17 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 ::45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 13:00 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 12 1:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13: IS 18 0 0 0 0 18 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 13 1 0 0 0 14 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 18 2:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14: IS 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 17 1 0 0 0 18 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 3:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:15 19 2 0 0 0 21 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 19 1 0 0 0 20 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 24 0 0 0 0 24 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16: IS 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:00 24 0 0 0 0 24 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17: IS 15 0 0 0 0 15 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 18: 15 13 0 0 0 0 13 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:15 4 2 0 0 0 6 19:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 7:30 6 1 0 0 0 7 19:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:00 13 1 0 0 0 14 8:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 8:30 10 0 1 0 0 11 20:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 8:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:45 21:00 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11 9:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 9:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:15 8 1 0 0 0 9 9:30 10 1 0 0 0 11 21:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:45 22:00 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4 10:00 5 0 1 0 0 6 10:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 21 1 0 0 0 22 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 7 1 0 0 0 8 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 0 14 23:00 3 0 0 0 0 11:00 3 11:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 18 1 0 0 0 19 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 225 11 2 0 0 238 TOTAL 1 594 9 0 0 0 603 AM PEAK HOUR 10:30 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 56 AM PEAK VOLUME 83 819 20 2 0 0 841 TRUCKS 97.4 % 2.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 38 1 0 1 0 0 39 TRUCKS PM PEAK 83 0 0 0 0 83 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 6 - Stonegate Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS72 Southern dwy west of Doolittle E 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 ::45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 5 2:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 3:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:00 6 1 0 0 0 7 16:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 17:45 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 18:00 6:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 18:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 7:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 9:00 4 0 0 0 0 21:00 3 0 0 0 0 9:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 3 21:45 22:00 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 10:00 3 0 0 0 0 10:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 22:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 22:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 7 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2 11:00 7 0 0 0 0 23:00 2 0 0 0 0 11:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 23:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 235 1 0 0 0 236 TOTAL 1 296 1 0 0 0 297 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM 1AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 48 AM PEAK VOLUME 42 531 2 0 0 0 533 TRUCKS 99.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 48 0 0 0 0 48 TRUCKS PM PEAK 40 0 0 0 0 40 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS CITY: WRCOG JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS82 Dwy east of Elm. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:3 00 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 0 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 21:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 AM PEAK HOUR 11:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 11:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 1 AM PEAK VOLUME 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 TRUCKS 100.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 TRUCKS PM PEAK 0 0 0 0 0 0 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS CITY: WRCOG JOB #: SC3826 LOCATION: CLASS82 Dwy east of Elm. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 2 1 0 0 0 3 0:3 00 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 3 0 0 1 0 4 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 1 1 0 0 0 2 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:00 19:00 3 0 0 0.... 0 3 7:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 5 20:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 21:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 1 1 0 0 0 2 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 0 1 0 0 0 1 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 38 2 0 0 0 40 TOTAL 1 65 3 0 1 0 69 AM PEAK HOUR 7:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 17 AM PEAK VOLUME 11 103 5 0 1 0 109 TRUCKS 94.5% 4.6% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 100.0 % TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 17 1 0 0 0 0 17 TRUCKS PM PEAK 9 1 0 0 0 10 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS83 Dwy south of Lakeshore. 0:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:00 23 3 0 0 0 26 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 17 2 0 0 0 19 0:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 0 0 0 17 1:00 13:00 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 17 2 0 0 0 19 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 1:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:45 36 0 0 0 0 36 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 29 2:00 29 0 0 0 0 2:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:15 25 2 0 0 0 27 2:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:30 13 2 0 0 0 15 2:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 14:45 32 1 0 1 0 34 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:00 27 0 0 0 0 27 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 25 1 0 0 0 26 3:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 43 0 0 0 0 43 2 0 0 0 0 2 36 0 0 0 0 36 4:00 16:00 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 23 1 0 0 0 24 4:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:30 41 0 0 0 0 41 4:45 2 1 0 0 0 3 16:45 35 0 0 0 0 35 5:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 42 2 0 0 0 44 5:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:15 35 0 0 0 0 35 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 5:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 6:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:00 45 0 0 0 0 45 6:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:15 40 0 0 0 0 40 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 35 1 0 0 0 36 6:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 7:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 19:00 32 0 0 0 0 32 7:15 4 1 0 0 0 5 19:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 7:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 7:45 28 0 0 0 0 28 19:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 8:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:00 37 1 0 0 0 38 8:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 20:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 8:45 14 1 0 0 0 15 20:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 13 0 0 0 0 13 31 0 0 0 0 31 9:00 21:00 9:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 21:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 9:30 12 2 0 0 0 14 21:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 9:45 14 1 0 0 0 15 21:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 15 3 0 0 0 18 14 0 0 0 0 14 10:00 22:00 10:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 22:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 10:30 10 2 0 0 0 12 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 10:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 12 2 0 0 0 6 11:00 14 23:00 6 0 0 0 0 11:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 11:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 23:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:45 26 0 0 0 0 26 23:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 TOTAL 380 17 0 0 0 397 TOTAL 1 1,151 18 0 1 0 1,170 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 94 AM PEAK VOLUME 155 1,531 35 0 1 0 1,567 TRUCKS 97.7 r 2.2 r 0.0 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 94 1 0 0 0 0 94 TRUCKS PM PEAK 153 2 0 0 0 155 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 7 - River's Edge Apartment Homes 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS83 Dwy south of Lakeshore. • 0:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 12:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 20 1 0 0 0 21 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 14 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:00 15 1:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 1:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:30 22 1 0 0 0 23 1:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:45 24 1 0 0 0 25 2:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 23 0 0 0 0 23 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 25 1 0 0 0 26 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 26 1 0 0 0 27 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:00 18 1 0 0 0 19 3:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:15 31 0 0 0 0 31 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 3:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 15:45 31 1 0 0 0 32 4:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:00 15 0 0 0 0 15 4:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 16:15 23 0 0 0 0 23 4:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 16:30 25 0 0 0 0 25 4:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 5:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:00 32 0 0 0 0 32 5:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:15 25 0 0 0 0 25 5:30 15 1 0 0 0 16 17:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 5:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 6:00 12 1 0 0 0 13 18:00 18 0 0 0 0 18 6:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 18: 15 24 0 0 0 0 24 6:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 18:30 25 1 0 0 0 26 6:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 18:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:00 13 2 0 0 0 15 19:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:15 35 0 0 0 0 35 19:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:30 55 0 0 0 0 55 19:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:45 40 0 0 0 0 40 19:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 8:00 35 0 0 0 0 35 20:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 8:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 20:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 8:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:30 15 1 0 0 0 16 8:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 20:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 9:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 21:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 9:15 28 0 0 0 0 28 21:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:30 24 1 0 0 0 25 21:30 6 1 0 0 0 7 9:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:45 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 10:00 21 2 0 0 0 23 22:00 7 10:15 26 3 0 0 0 29 22:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 10:30 16 2 0 0 0 18 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 16 3 0 0 0 19 15 22:45 23:00 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 11:00 15 0 0 0 0 6 11:15 14 1 0 0 0 15 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 656 18 0 0 0 674 TOTAL 775 11 0 0 0 786 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR �AM 4:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 165 PEAK VOLUME 109 1,431 29 0 0 0 1,460 TRUCKS 98.0 r 2.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 r TRUCKS AM PEAK 165 0 0 0 0 165 TRUCKS PM PEAK 109 0 0 0 0 109 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS90 Western Dwy south of Mayberry. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 0:3 22 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1:00 1 13:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 1:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:15 10 0 0 1 0 11 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 18 0 0 0 0 18 4 0 0 0 0 4 3:00 15:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 17 1 0 0 0 18 3:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 16:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 17:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 3 0 0 0 0 6:00 3 18:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 6:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 18:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 8 1 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 7:00 19:00 4 7:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 4 20:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 8:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:00 21:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 10:00 5 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:15 2 2 0 0 0 4 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 135 2 0 0 0 137 TOTAL 1 360 3 0 1 0 364 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 26 AM PEAK VOLUME 56 495 5 0 1 0 501 TRUCKS 98.8 r 1.0 r 0.0 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 26 1 0 0 0 0 26 TRUCKS PM PEAK 44 0 0 0 0 44 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS90 Western Dwy south of Mayberry. JEL 0 70:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 12:45 13:00 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 6 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 13:45 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 12 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 14:45 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 10 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:45 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 15:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 11 4:00 16:00 11 0 0 0 0 4:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 16:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:45 8 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 16 5:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 17:00 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 13 1 0 0 0 14 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 6:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 18:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 19:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 21 0 0 0 0 21 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 20:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:30 8 0 0 1 0 9 20:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 21:45 22:00 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 10:00 9 1 0 0 0 10:15 4 3 0 0 0 7 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 2 1 0 0 0 3 22:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 11 22:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 11:00 11 0 0 0 0 23:00 2 0 0 0 0 11:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 233 5 0 1 0 239 TOTAL 1 348 1 0 0 0 349 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 53 AM PEAK VOLUME 55 581 6 0 1 0 588 TRUCKS 98.8 r 1.0 r 0.0 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 53 0 0 0 0 53 TRUCKS PM PEAK 54 1 0 0 0 55 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS91 Eastern Dwy south of Mayberry. 0:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 0:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 1:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 13:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 0 18:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 12 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 19:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 7:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 19:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 3 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:30 6 0 0 1 0 7 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:00 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:45 3 2 0 0 0 5 21:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:15 3 2 0 0 0 5 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 10:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 127 4 0 1 0 132 TOTAL 1 292 1 0 0 0 293 AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 31 AM PEAK VOLUME 45 419 5 0 1 0 425 TRUCKS 98.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 31 1 0 0 0 0 31 TRUCKS PM PEAK 40 1 0 0 0 41 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 8 - Mayberry Colony Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS91 Eastern Dwy south of Mayberry. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 0:3 11 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 4 0 0 1 0 5 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 15:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 7 1 0 0 0 8 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 5:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 5:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 17:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 18:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:00 19:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 19:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8:00 1 20:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 9:00 2 21:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:15 7 1 0 0 0 8 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 147 1 0 0 0 148 TOTAL 1 181 1 0 1 0 183 AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 39 AM PEAK VOLUME 34 328 2 0 1 0 331 TRUCKS 99.1 r 0.6 r 0.0 r 0.3 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 36 1 0 0 0 0 36 TRUCKS PM PEAK 25 0 0 0 0 25 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS92 DWY west of Hathaway. • 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 6 0 1 0 0 7 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 7 1 0 0 0 8 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:00 10 1 0 0 0 11 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 3:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 5:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:15 1 0 1 0 0 2 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:00 4 1 0 0 0 5 7:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 8:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 20:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:45 3 1 0 0 0 4 21:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 22:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 4 0 0_ 0_ 0 4 11:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 4 1 0 0 0 5 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 101 2 1 0 0 104 TOTAL 1 312 3 1 0 0 316 JAM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM IAM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 22 AM PEAK VOLUME 45 CARS 2-AXLE TRUCKS 3-AXLE TRUCKS 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5-AXLE + TRUCKS 413 5 2 0 0 420 98.3 % 1.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% AM PEAK 1 22 1 0 0 0 0 22 PM PEAK 32 0 0 0 0 32 A13123 Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS92 DWY west of Hathaway. • 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 3 0 1 0 0 4 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 3 1 0 0 0 4 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 9 1 0 0 0 10 4:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:00 4 1 0 0 0 5 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:45 4 0 1 0 0 5 18:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 7:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 19:15 4 1 0 0 0 5 7:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 19:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 8:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 11:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 1 134 0 1 0 0 135 TOTAL 1 219 5 1 0 0 1 225 JAM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 29 AM PEAK VOLUME 36 CARS 2-AXLE TRUCKS 3-AXLE TRUCKS 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5-AXLE + TRUCKS 353 5 2 0 0 360 98.1 r 1.4 r 0.6 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i AM PEAK 1 29 1 0 0 0 0 29 PM PEAK 27 1 0 0 0 28 A021323 Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AinnTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS93 DWY north of George. • 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 12 0 1 0 0 13 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 10 1 0 0 0 11 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 12 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:00 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 10 1 0 0 0 11 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 3 14:00 2:00 3 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:15 1 1 0 0 0 2 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 3:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:00 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 19 1 0 0 0 20 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:00 15 1 0 0 0 16 5:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 17:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 18 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 23 6:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:00 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18: 15 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 7:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 19:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 19:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 8:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 20:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:45 15 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 10 20:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 10 9:00 21:00 10 0 0 0 0 9:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 22:00 7 0 0 0 0 10:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 7 10:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 22:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:45 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 5 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 9 11:00 23:00 9 0 0 0 0 11:15 11 1 0 0 0 12 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 TOTAL 213 2 0 0 0 215 TOTAL 1 527 4 1 0 0 532 JAM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 55 AM PEAK VOLUME 76 CARS 2-AXLE TRUCKS 3-AXLE TRUCKS 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5-AXLE + TRUCKS 1 740 6 1 0 0 747 99.1 % 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% AM PEAK 55 0 1 0 0 0 PM PEAK 62 1 0 0 0 763 A13123 Study Site 9 - Summit Ridge Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AinnTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS93 DWY north of George. • 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 0:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 12 1 1 0 0 14 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 12:45 13:00 20 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 16 1:00 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 9 1 0 0 0 10 1 14:00 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 18 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:30 1 1 0 0 0 2 14:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 14 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 19 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 16:00 17 0 0 0 0 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:00 5 0 0 0 0 5:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 5 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 5:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:45 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 17:45 13 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 12 6:00 18:00 6:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 18: 15 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 7:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 10 7:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 25 19:45 20:00 11 7 0 0 0 ____ 0 0 0 ____ 0 0 11 7 8:00 25 0 0 0 0 8:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 20:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 8:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 10 20:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5 9:00 10 0 0 0 0 21:00 5 0 0 0 0 9:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 21:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 21:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 21:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:00 5 0 0 0 0 10:00 9 1 0 0 0 10 5 10:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 22:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:45 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11 22:45 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 11:00 23:00 11:15 8 1 0 0 0 9 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 19 1 0 0 0 20 23:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 329 4 0 0 0 333 TOTAL 468 2 1 0 0 471 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM JAM PEAK HOUR 12:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 94 AM PEAK VOLUME 67 CARS 2-AXLE TRUCKS 3-AXLE TRUCKS 4-AXLE TRUCKS 5-AXLE + TRUCKS 797 6 1 0 0 804 99.1 r 0.7 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i AM PEAK 94 0 0 0 0 94 PM PEAK 51 0 0 0 0 51 A021323 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS87 Dwy north of Thornton. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 2 1 0 0 0 3 0:3 33 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 3 1 0 0 0 4 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1:00 1 13:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 15:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 6:45 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 7:00 19:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 7:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 7:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 3 20:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 8:45 2 1 0 0 0 3 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 0 0 9:00 10 21:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 21:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 22:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 4 1 0 0 0 5 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:30 4 1 0 0 0 5 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 89 3 0 0 0 92 TOTAL 1 224 2 0 0 0 226 AM PEAK HOUR 8:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 5:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 22 AM PEAK VOLUME 35 313 5 0 0 0 318 TRUCKS 98.4% 1.6 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 16 1 0 0 0 0 16 TRUCKS PM PEAK 30 0 0 0 0 30 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS87 Dwy north of Thornton. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 0 1 0 0 0 1 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 12:45 13:00 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 1:00 1 0 0 0 0 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15:45 16:00 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 17:00 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 5:00 1 0 0 0 0 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 6:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 19:00 5 0 0 0 0 5. 7:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 19:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:00 41 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 5 1 0 0 0 6 6 20:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 9:00 6 0 0 0 0 21:00 2 0 0 0 0 9:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 4 21:45 22:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 10:00 4 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:45 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 11:00 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 11:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 11:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 4 1 0 0 0 5 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 128 2 0 0 0 130 TOTAL 1 194 1 0 0 0 195 AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 37 AM PEAK VOLUME 31 322 3 0 0 0 325 TRUCKS 99.1 r 0.9 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 37 0 0 0 0 37 TRUCKS PM PEAK 29 0 0 0 0 29 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS88 Southern Dwy east of Cawston. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 12 0 0 0 0 12 0:3 33 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1:00 1 13:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 1:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 3:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 5:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 5:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 17:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 5:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 6:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 19:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 7:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 19:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 6 20:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 20:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:00 21:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 21:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 10:00 3 22:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:30 5 1 0 0 0 6 22:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 1 1 0 0 0 2 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 145 2 0 0 0 147 TOTAL 1 340 0 0 0 0 340 AM PEAK HOUR 7:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:45 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 38 AM PEAK VOLUME 52 485 2 0 0 0 487 TRUCKS 99.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 38 1 0 0 0 0 38 TRUCKS PM PEAK 52 0 0 0 0 52 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS88 Southern Dwy east of Cawston. 0:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 0:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:30 7 2 0 0 0 9 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:45 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 8 1:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 7 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 14 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 3:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 4:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 5:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:00 12 0 0 0 0 12 5:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 5:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 7:00 20 0 0 0 0 20 19:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 19:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 19:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:00 41 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 20:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 8:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 20:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 9:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 5 21:45 22:00 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 10:00 5 0 0 0 0 10:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:45 7 1 0 0 0 8 22:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 8 1 0 0 0 9 0 11:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 11:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 5 1 0 0 0 6 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 1 201 3 0 0 0 204 TOTAL 1 282 2 0 0 0 284 AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 78 AM PEAK VOLUME 47 483 5 0 0 0 488 TRUCKS 99.0 r 1.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 75 0 0 0 0 75 TRUCKS PM PEAK 36 0 0 0 0 36 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS89 Northern Dwy east of Cawston. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:3 00 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:00 7 1 0 0 0 8 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3:00 15:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 5 0 1 0 0 6 3:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 4:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 16:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 4:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 5:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 5:45 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 6:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 18:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 6:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:00 19:00 5 0 0 0.... 0 5 7:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 19:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 7:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 20:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 8:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 20:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 9:00 5 1 0 0 0 6 21:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 21:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:45 6 0 0 0 0 6 10:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 11:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 23:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 11:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 11:45 3 1 0 0 0 4 23:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 TOTAL 73 2 0 0 0 75 TOTAL 1 231 1 1 0 0 233 AM PEAK HOUR 8:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 4:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 17 AM PEAK VOLUME 32 304 3 1 0 0 308 TRUCKS 98.7 r 1.0 r 0.3 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 10 1 0 0 0 0 10 TRUCKS PM PEAK 32 0 0 0 0 32 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 10 - Riverdale Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS89 Northern Dwy east of Cawston. 0:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:3 33 0 0 0 0 3 12:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1:00 0 13:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 1:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 2:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 2:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 3:00 15:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 3:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 15:30 5 0 1 0 0 6 3:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 4:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 16:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 4:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 0 0 17:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 5:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 5:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 5:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 17:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 18:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 6:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 18:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 6:45 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 18:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 7 7:00 19:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 7:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 19:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 19:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 7:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 19:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 4 20:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 8:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 20:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 20:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 8:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 20:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:00 21:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 9:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 21:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 9:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 21:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 9:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 21:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 10:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 22:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 10:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 22:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 10:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 22:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 11:45 1 1 0 0 0 2 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 104 1 0 0 0 105 TOTAL 1 183 0 1 0 0 184 AM PEAK HOUR 6:45 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 24 AM PEAK VOLUME 28 287 1 1 0 0 289 TRUCKS 99.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0 % TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 21 1 0 0 0 0 21 TRUCKS PM PEAK 23 0 0 0 0 23 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 11 - Parkridge Meadows Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS70 Dwy east of E Parkridge. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 0:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 0:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 12:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 0:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 12:45 13:00 13 20 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 22 1:00 2 0 0 0 0 1:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 13:15 10 2 0 0 0 12 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 18 1 0 0 0 19 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 13:45 18 19 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 21 2:00 1 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 21 1 0 0 0 22 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 37 1 0 0 0 38 2:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 14:45 15:00 32 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 15 3:00 4 0 0 0 0 3:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:15 22 2 0 0 0 24 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 20 0 0 0 0 20 3:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 7 1545 16:00 17 26 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 17 29 4:00 7 0 0 0 0 4:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 4:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 16:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 4:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 3 16:45 17:00 25 ----- 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 23 5:00 3 0 0 0 0 5:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:15 25 0 0 0 0 25 5:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 17:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 5:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 6:00 4 0 0 0 0 4 18:00 13 0 0 0 0 13 6:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 18: 15 28 1 0 0 0 29 6:30 3 2 0 0 0 5 18:30 14 1 0 0 0 15 6:45 8 1 0 0 0 9 18:45 26 0 0 0 0 26 7:00 6 2 0 0 0 8 19:00 18 0 0 0 0 18 7:15 7 3 0 0 0 10 19:15 9 0 0 0 0 9 7:30 20 0 1 0 0 21 19:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 7:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 12 19:45 20:00 20 14 0 0 0 -_ _ 0 0 0 _ 0 .__ 0 20 - 14 8:00 11 0 1 0 0 8:15 15 1 0 0 0 16 20:15 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:30 11 1 0 0 0 12 20:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 8:45 8 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 11 20:45 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 9 9:00 21:00 9:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 21:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 9:30 9 2 0 0 0 11 21:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 9:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 13 21:45 22:00 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 11 10:00 13 0 0 0 0 10:15 3 1 0 0 0 4 22:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 10:30 9 1 0 0 0 10 22:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 10:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 10 22:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 7 11,00 10 0 0 0 0 23:00 7 0 0 0 0 11:15 7 1 0 0 0 8 23:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 23:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 11:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 23:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 284 17 2 0 0 303 TOTAL 1 790 17 0 0 0 807 AM PEAK HOUR 7:30 AM AM PEAK HOUR 2:00 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 60 AM PEAK VOLUME 113 1,074 34 2 0 0 1,110 TRUCKS 96.8 r 3.1 r 0.2 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 57 1 2 0 0 60 TRUCKS PM PEAK 98 3 0 0 0 101 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 11 - Parkridge Meadows Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS70 Dwy east of E Parkridge. 0:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 12:00 8 0 0 0 0 8 0:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 12:15 12 1 0 0 0 13 0:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 0:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 12:45 13:00 10 16 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 18 1:00 2 0 0 0 0 1:15 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:15 15 2 0 0 0 17 1:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:30 14 0 0 0 0 14 1:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:45 18 16 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 18 19 2:00 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 2:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 20 2 0 0 0 22 2:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 14:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 2:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14:45 15:00 14 16 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 17 3:00 1 0 0 0 0 3:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:15 29 2 0 0 0 31 3:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 15:30 24 0 0 0 0 24 3:45 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:45 21 0 0 0 0 21 4:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 16:00 15 3 0 0 0 18 4:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 16:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 4:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 16:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 4:45 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 5:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:00 -- 18 0 0 0 0 18 5:15 19 0 0 0 0 19 17:15 15 0 0 0 0 15 5:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 17:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 5:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 17:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 18:00 11 0 0 0 0 11 6:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 18: 15 12 0 0 0 0 12 6:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 18:30 15 3 0 0 0 18 6:45 28 3 0 0 0 31 18:45 12 0 0 0 0 12 7:00 12 1 0 0 0 13 19:00 14 1 0 0 0 15 7:15 35 4 0 0 0 39 19:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 7:30 26 0 0 0 0 26 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:45 26 0 1 0 0 27 19:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 8:00 23 0 0 0 0 23 20:00 16 0 0 0 0 16 8:15 10 0 1 0 0 11 20:15 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:30 14 1 0 0 0 15 20:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 8:45 20 3 0 0 0 23 20:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 15 9:00 15 0 0 0 0 21:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 9:15 16 0 0 0 0 16 21:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 9:30 9 1 0 0 0 10 21:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 9:45 16 1 0 0 0 17 10 21:45 22:00 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 10:00 10 0 0 0 0 10:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 8 1 0 0 0 9 22:30 7 0 0 0 0 7 10:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 22:45 3 0 0 0 0 3 23:00 8 0 0 0 0 11:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 8 11:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 23:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 12 1 0 0 0 13 23:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 11:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 511 16 2 0 0 529 TOTAL 1 572 20 0 0 0 592 AM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 115 AM PEAK VOLUME 94 1,083 36 2 0 0 1,121 TRUCKS 96.6% 3.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% TRUCKS AM PEAK 110 4 1 0 0 115 TRUCKS PM PEAK 60 0 0 0 0 60 + TRUCKS A021323 Study Site 12 - Hunt Club Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: W RCOG LOCATION: CLASS81 Dwy west of Goetz. 12:00 29 1 0 0 0 30 0 70:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 5 7 0 0 0 0 7 12:15 34 0 0 0 0 34 9 0 0 0 0 9 12:30 28 0 0 0 0 28 5 6 0 0 0 0 6 3 12:45 13:00 32 20 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 33 22 1:00 3 0 0 0 0 1:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 13:15 40 2 0 0 0 42 1:30 3 0 0 0 0 3 13:30 37 0 0 0 0 37 1:45 7 0 0 0 0 7 13:45 29 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 28 2:00 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:00 2:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 14:15 48 1 0 0 0 49 2:30 5 0 0 0 0 5 14:30 45 0 0 0 0 45 2:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 14:45 33 33 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 3:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 15:00 3:15 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:15 51 0 0 0 0 51 3:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 15:30 48 0 1 0 0 49 3:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 15:45 62 56 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 62 57 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 4:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 16:15 42 0 0 0 0 42 4:30 1 0 0 0 0 1 16:30 49 0 0 0 0 49 4:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 5 16:45 39 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 59 5:00 5 0 0 0 0 17:00 5:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 17:15 43 0 0 0 0 43 5:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 17:30 40 0 0 0 0 40 5:45 5 0 0 0 0 5 17:45 50 38 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 39 6:00 6 0 0 0 0 6 18:00 6:15 3 0 0 0 0 3 18: 15 33 0 0 0 0 33 6:30 8 0 0 0 0 8 18:30 44 0 0 0 0 44 6:45 9 0 0 0 0 9 18:45 35 1 0 0 0 36 7:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 19:00 33 0 0 0 0 33 7:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 19:15 29 0 0 0 0 29 7:30 15 0 0 0 0 15 19:30 27 0 0 0 0 27 7:45 34 0 0 0 0 34 19:45 20 1 0 0 0 21 8:00 44 1 0 0 0 45 20:00 29 0 0 0 0 29 8:15 47 2 1 0 0 50 20:15 25 0 0 0 0 25 8:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 20:30 33 0 0 0 0 33 8:45 37 0 0 0 0 37 14 20:45 21:00 29 0 0 0 0 29 29 9:00 14 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 9:15 13 0 0 0 0 13 21:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 9:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 21:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 9:45 10 1 0 0 0 11 12 21:45 22:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 15 10:00 11 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 10:15 16 2 0 0 0 18 22:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 10:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 22:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 10:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 16 22:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 11 11:00 14 1 1 0 0 23:00 11 0 0 0 0 11:15 20 0 0 0 0 20 23:15 21 0 0 0 0 21 11:30 17 0 0 0 0 17 23:30 10 0 0 0 0 10 11:45 19 0 0 0 0 19 23:45 14 0 0 0 0 14 TOTAL 565 8 2 0 0 575 TOTAL 1 1,571 14 1 0 0 1,586 AM PEAK HOUR 8:00 AM AM PEAK HOUR 3:15 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 155 AM PEAK VOLUME 219 2,136 22 3 0 0 2,161 TRUCKS 98.8 r 1.0 r 0.1 i 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 151 3 1 0 0 155 TRUCKS PM PEAK 192 1 0 0 0 193 + TRUCKS A13123 Study Site 12 - Hunt Club Apartments 24-HOUR ROADWAY SEGMENT COUNTS (WITH CLASSIFICATION) Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888 cs@aimtd.com DATE: THREE DAYS JOB #: SC3826 CITY: WRCOG LOCATION: CLASS81 Dwy west of Goetz. 0:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 12:00 27 1 0 0 0 28 0:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 12:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 0:30 6 0 0 0 0 6 12:30 42 1 0 0 0 43 0:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 12:45 29 1 0 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 33 1:00 2 13:00 31 2 0 0 0 1:15 5 0 0 0 0 5 13:15 24 0 0 0 0 24 1:30 4 0 0 0 0 4 13:30 39 3 0 0 0 42 1:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 13:45 40 1 0 0 0 41 2 0 0 0 0 2 53 2:00 14:00 53 0 0 0 0 2:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 14:15 38 0 0 0 0 38 2:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 14:30 32 0 0 0 0 32 2:45 4 0 0 0 0 4 14:45 25 0 0 0 0 25 4 0 0 0 0 4 39 3:00 15:00 38 1 0 0 0 3:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 15:15 39 1 0 0 0 40 3:30 12 0 0 0 0 12 15:30 38 0 1 0 0 39 3:45 15 0 0 0 0 15 15:45 39 0 0 0 0 39 13 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 4:00 13 16:00 4:15 11 0 0 0 0 11 16:15 32 1 0 0 0 33 4:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 16:30 33 0 0 0 0 33 4:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 16:45 23 0 0 0 0 23 28 0 0 0 0 5:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 17:00 28 5:15 18 0 0 0 0 18 17:15 39 0 0 0 0 39 5:30 21 0 0 0 0 21 17:30 31 0 0 0 0 31 5:45 28 0 0 0 0 28 17:45 27 0 0 0 0 27 6:00 14 0 0 0 0 14 18:00 17 0 0 0 0 17 6:15 25 1 0 0 0 26 18: 15 24 0 0 0 0 24 6:30 37 0 0 0 0 37 18:30 19 0 0 0 0 19 6:45 30 0 0 0 0 30 18:45 24 0 0 0 0 24 7:00 47 1 0 0 0 48 19:00 20 1 0 0 0 21 7:15 65 0 0 0 0 65 19:15 17 0 0 0 0 17 7:30 72 0 0 0 0 72 19:30 13 0 0 0 0 13 7:45 87 0 0 0 0 87 19:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 8:00 53 0 0 0 0 53 20:00 10 0 0 0 0 10 8:15 30 1 0 0 0 31 20:15 18 2 0 0 0 20 8:30 16 2 1 0 0 19 20:30 18 0 0 0 0 18 8:45 17 0 0 0 0 17 20:45 16 0 0 0 0 16 9:00 30 0 0 0 0 30 21:00 9 0 0 0 0 9 9:15 14 0 0 0 0 14 21:15 8 0 0 0 0 8 9:30 23 0 0 0 0 23 21:30 16 0 0 0 0 16 9:45 20 0 0 0 0 20 21:45 8 0 0 0 0 8 25 1 0 0 0 10:00 26 22:00 5 0 0 0 0 5 10:15 27 0 0 0 0 27 22:15 4 0 0 0 0 4 10:30 17 1 0 0 0 18 22:30 11 0 0 0 0 11 10:45 31 0 0 0 0 31 22:45 10 0 0 0 0 10 11:00 24 0 0 0 0 24 23:00 7 0 0 0 0 7 11:15 25 1 0 0 0 26 23:15 6 0 0 0 0 6 11:30 22 0 0 0 0 22 23:30 2 0 0 0 0 2 11:45 16 0 1 0 0 17 23:45 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 987 8 2 0 0 997 TOTAL 1 1,092 15 1 0 0 1,108 JAM PEAK HOUR 7:15 AM AM PEAK HOUR 1:30 PM AM PEAK VOLUME 277 AM PEAK VOLUME 174 2,079 23 3 0 0 2,105 TRUCKS 98.8 r 1.1 r 0.1 r 0.0 r 0.0 r 100.0 i TRUCKS AM PEAK 1 277 1 0 0 0 0 277 TRUCKS PM PEAK 125 0 0 0 0 125 + TRUCKS Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 2, 2023 Page 12 of 13 Appendix B: Apartment Characteristics 15170 Perris Blvd, 1 Central Zone Oakwood Apartments Moreno Valley, CA +1 951-243-0800 N/A 80 93 68 241 711 3.0 832 1,042 1,282 1,052 250,642 1040.01 92551 Springbrook Park 1066 Orange St, 2 Northwest Zone +1951-682-9774 N/A - 40 32 40 - 112 224 2.0 - 800 967 1,100 - 956 106,944 954.86 Apartments Riverside, CA 92501 21550 Box Springs Rd, 3 Central Zone Vista Springs Moreno Valley, CA +1 951-276-0334 N/A 108 104 212 316 1.5 690 960 825 174,360 822.45 Apartments 92557 3390 Country Village Vesada Apartment 4 Northwest Zone Road, Riverside, CA +1 951-462-2198 california.weidner.com 18 72 153 18 261 450 1.7 629 782 1,021 1,168 900 244,863 938.17 Homes 92509 Morning Ridge 30660 Milky Way Dr, 5 Southwest Zone +1951-699-0886 morningridgeapts.com - 74 126 - - 200 326 1.6 680 950 - - 815 170,020 850.10 Apartments Temecula, CA 92592 6506 Doolittle Ave, 6 Northwest Zone Stonegate Apartments (951) 351-9445 stonegateriverside.com 1 79 80 160 240 1.5 300 705 905 - 637 128,395 802.47 Riverside, CA 92503 River's Edge Apartment 2088 E Lakeshore Dr, riversedgeapartmentlivi 7 Southwest Zone +1 951-678-8553 96 88 184 272 1.5 762 1,089 - 926 168,984 918.39 Homes Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 ng.com Hemet/San Jacinto Mayberry Colony 40389 Mayberry Ave # www.mayberrycolony.co 8 +1951-929-3380 - 34 55 - - 89 144 1.6 - 790 962 - - 876 79,770 896.29 Zone Apartments Al, Hemet, CA 92544 m 555 N Hathaway St # Summit Ridge www.summitridgebanni 9 Pass Zone 1101, Banning, CA +1 951-849-3001 - 40 40 80 200 2.5 850 1,058 - 954 42,320 529.00 Apartments 92220 ng.com Hemet/San Jacinto 1250 S Cawston Ave, www.rentriverdaleapts.c 10 Riverdale Apartments +1951-766-5672 - - 36 60 - 96 252 2.6 - - 984 1,033 - 1,009 97,404 1014.63 Zone Hemet, CA 92545 om Parkridge Meadows 219 E Parkridge Ave, 11 Northwest Zone +1951-736-8681 www.allenproperties.net - - 87 1 - 88 177 2.0 - - 780 - - 780 67,860 771.14 Apartments Corona, CA 92879 1355 S Perris Blvd, www.huntclubperris.co 12 Central Zone Hunt Club Apartments +1 951-657-0228 203 - 203 406 2.0 962 962 195,286 962.00 Perris, CA 92570 m I Appendix B: Apartment Characteristics Christopher Gray and Chris Tzeng, WRCOG May 2, 2023 Page 13 of 13 Appendix C: Correlation Plots Daily Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex Total # of Dwelling Units 2,500 2,000 1,500 "o. 1,000 0 soo 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Total# of Dwelling Units Y=5.7897x+162 R' = 0.7617 AM Peak Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex Total # of Dwelling Units 180 160 a 140 120 w 100 a ao f 60 ••� 40 A. • 20 6 0 100 150 200 250 300 Total If of Dwelling Units y=0,4893x+12.967 R' = 0.7277 Daily Trip Generation by Average # of Bedrooms Per Dwelling Unit Average # of Bedrooms per DU Daily Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.) 2,500 2,500 d 2,000 > • - 2,000 - m1,500 • • m 1,500 a 1,000 _ � • n 1,000 • M = 500 0 0 2.5 3.0 3.5 0 per DU y = 249.92x + 601.26 R' = 0.0813 C 500 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Average If of Bedrooms AM Peak Trip Generation by Average If of Bedrooms Per Dwelling Unit Average # of Bedrooms per DU 180 160 • a 140 • 120 • w 100 • a so • �..... f 60 • • • 40 A. 20 6 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Average # of Bedrooms per DU y = 20.854x+ 50.612 R' = 0.0758 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.) y = 1.4463x - 174.18 R2 = 0.2107 AM Peak Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.) 180 160 a 140 120 y 100 a ao H 60 40 20 Q 0 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.) y= 0.1258x- 18.538 R' = 0.2131 PM Peak Trip Generation by Average # of Bedrooms Per Dwelling PM Peak Trip Generation by # of Dwelling Units in Complex PM Peak Trip Generation by Average Size of Dwelling Unit Unit Total # of Dwelling Units Average # of Bedrooms per DU Average DU Size (Sq. Ft.) 180 r 160 140 1zo y100 a so 60 40 a 20 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Total# of Dwelling Units Y=0.4552x+15.198 R' = 0.7495 180 • r 160 140 Izo • y100 li 80 H 60 • 40 • y 20 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Average # of Bedrooms per DU Y=19.26x +50.489 R' = 0.0769 L s 160 140 A 1zo y100 on 80 60 40 a 20 0 Appendix C: Correlation Plots Appendix L - Non -Residential Fee Calculation The non-residential fee was calculated by multiplying the estimated Regional System of Highways and Arterials improvements cost attributable to new development (Section 4.0) by the proportion of all regional trips that are generated by non-residential land uses (Section 5.3), and dividing this number by the projected increase in non-residential land use between 2018 and 2045 (Table 2.3, Section 2.0) and the proportional share of new employees in each sector. In preparation for the fee calculation, SCAG 2020 RTP/SCS employment data by sector was first converted to land use as square feet of gross floor area (SF GFA). Non- residential employee to gross floor area conversion factors were derived from four sources. These sources are: ■ Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (PBQD), Land Use Density Conversion Factors For The Long -Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990. Table 8. ■ Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual, June 2001. Appendix C. ■ Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Employment Density Study, October 31, 2001, Table IIB ■ County of Riverside, General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015, Appendix E: Socioeconomic Build -Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5 The employment conversion factors developed for use in the calculation of the non- residential fee are tabulated in Exhibits L-1 through L-4. The relevant sections of these respective publications are included in this Appendix as Exhibits L-5 through L-8. To account for the difference in trip generation rates between the various employment sectors, the non-residential fee value for each sector was normalized by multiplying by the respective median trip generation rate for the range of associated land use types as published in the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition, 2021. The respective fee values are presented in Section 6.2. The table detailing the calculation of the non-residential fee (and residential fee) is included in Appendix K as Exhibit K-1. WRCOG L-1 Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 SF per Employee TUMF Median Em to t Sector p ymen Business by Lantl Use Category (1) Em to p yees Gross Floor Area (TSF) Conversion Rafe Land Use Category Minimum Range Conversion Rate Land Use Category based on Average Employees per Acre Employeea/TSF Lend Use Category (4) SF per Employee Employees/TSF Employment (Employees/TSF) (2) (Employees/TSF) (3) antl Average FAR Conversion Factors Rlverside Coun (Employees/TSF) Heavy Manufacturing 6.3]9 5.117 1.25 R&D/LI/BP 2.50 R&D/Flex Soace 867 H htlndu51rio1 1030 General Manufacturinq 11.603 6.103 1.90 Heavy Industry 2.00 Licht Manufaoturina 1548 Heavy Industry 1500 Light Manufacturinq 8,624 3.962 2.18 Warehouse 1.00 Warehouse 1195 Manufacturinq. Small Module 5.559 3.038 1.83 Industrial High Tech/Research 954 411 2.32 Wholesale, Trade Industry 6.120 4.140 1.48 Warehousing 119 279 0.43 General Industry 1.023 917 1.I2 Median 1.65 Median 2A0 Median 1195.0 a." Median 1265.0 0.79 1.25 Retail Trade 34.821 20.125 1.73 Regional Retail 268 Commercial Retail 500 Personnal, Rental and Repair 3.452 1.590 2.11 Other Retail/Service 629 Equipment Rental 1'080 453 2.38 Retail General Commercial 12.97E 17.023 0.76 Median 1.95 Median 448.5 2.23 Median 500.0 2.00 2.00 Financial/Insurance/Real Estate 7.738 1.095 7.07 Office 3.00 Low -Rise Office 481 Commercial Office 300 Small Office 3.945 548 7.20 Medical/PO/Bank 3.50 Hotel/Motel 3476 Business Park Soo Professional Services 5,470 1.529 3.58 Hospital 2.50 Service Business Services General Offices 6.680 8,900 1.966 3.886 3.40 2.29 Restaurant 3A0 Medical Services 9.006 3.201 2.81 Restaurant 23.345 4.061 5.75 Median 3.58 Median 3A0 Median 1978.5 0.51 Median 4 0.0 222 2.61 Government/Civic 3A0 Government Offices 206 Government/Public Sector library 1.50 Median 2.25 1 Median 208.0 4.81 3.53 Business by Land Use Categories Wholesale Trade Commercial and Automotive Repair were excluded as there is inconsistencies between the Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Long Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties categonzafion, and the NAILS Major Group categorization. - OCTA Typical Employment Conversion Factors for Commercial excluded as it potentially covers uses in both Retail and Service categories; Hotel/Motel, Schools, Golf Course, Developed Park, Park and Agricultural were excluded as they are calculated from units other than TSF. -TUMF Median Employment Conversion Factor Is the median of Il I through I4I Conversion Rates III Cordoba Corporation/PBQD, Land Use Density Conversion Factors For Lone Rance Condor Studv San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, August 20, 1990. is ble 8. 121 OCTA, Orange Cou.N Subarea Model Cud, - Manual. June 2001. Appendix C. 131 SLAG, Employment Dens'N Study October 31. 2001, Table IIB I41 County of Riverside, General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015, Appendix E: Socioeconomic Build -Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5 EXHIBIT L-2 Po alation and Em Io ment Eatimutea Setter 2018 2045 Change Emplo�eCo}SF rabn CtwnBe In SF of GM Population 1,905.440 2.533.876 628.436 Households Single-FamiN 397.407 564.898 167.491 Multi -Fa mily 554573 812399 Totals Employees Indusfrial 169,334 245,915 76,581 1.25 61,489,565 Retail 73,814 86,929 13, 115' 200 6,557,500 Service 308.703 482,958 174255 261 66,735,957 Government/Public Sector totals 18,569 570420 30,640 1 846442 12,071t 276 3.53 3,421665 139203698 Source; SLAG 2020 RT SCS; RivCOM EXHIBIT L-3 Trip Generation Rate Comparison Non -Residential Median Share PM ITE Median PM Trip Growth Calculated PM Weighted Median Peak Period Pass By Adjusted PM Peak Peak Hour Trips ITE Median PM Peak (SFGrowth - Peak Hour Trips per PM Peak Hour Trips Trips (Retail and Hour Trips Per Employee Growth SF Growth Per Employee Hour Trips per TSF ITEMedion) Employee Per Employee Service Uses) Employee Industrial 76,581 61,489,565 0.7 0.6 36,894 0.5 0.6 0.6 Retail 13.115 6,557,500 3.3 5.0 32,788 2.5 2.9 37% 1.8 Service 174,255 66,735,957 2.2 5.7 380,395 2.2 P.2 44% 1.2 Government/Public Sector 12,071 3,420,665 3.3 3.2 10,946 0.9 2.1 21 276,022 138,203,698 461,022 EXHIBIT L-4 Representative ITE Weekdav PM Peak Hop, Trip Gene,,H,, Rates RESIDENTIAL PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Cateaory ITE Reference Trip Ends per DU Tno Ends per Residents Si all Family ResldenRal Sinale Family Detached Housina 210 D99 0.28 Multi Family Sinale-Family Attached Housina 215 0.61 0.44 Multifamily Housina )Low -Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit 220 0.57 0.27 MUlfifamit, Housina)Mid-Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit 221 0.39 0.23 MUlfifamilv Housina lHiah-Risel Not Close to Rail Transit 222 0.40 Affordable Housina- Income Limits 223 0.so 0.14 Average 0.49 0.27 Median 0.50 0.25 NON-RESIDENTIAL PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Period Land Use Cateaory ITE Reference Tno Ends per TSF* Tria Ends per Emblovee' Pass by Trips** Industrial Intermodal Truck Terminal 30 1.89 0.72 General Liaht lndusiry 110 O.Bo 0.69 Industrial Park 130 0.40 0.42 Manufactunna 140 0.80 0.40 Warehousina Iso 0.23 0.68 Hiah-Cube Transload and Short -Tenn Storaae 154 0.17 Hiah-Cu be Fulfillment Center Warehouse -Non -Sod 155 0.27 Hiah-Cube Parcel Hid Warehouse 156 0.71 Average 0.66 0.58 Median 0.56 0.68 Retall Buildina Materials and Lumber 812 2.65 3.30 Free-Standina Discount Superstore 813 4.39 1.75 29% Variety Store 814 1.42 12.65 34% Free-Standina Discount Store 815 5.42 2.36 20% Hardware/Paint Store 816 ].to 3.77 26% Nursery (Garden Center) 817 8.37 2.55 Nursery )Wholesale) 818 5.01 0.59 Shopping Center 820 4.09 1.91 Shod.ina Center 115DK to 300K1 820 29% Shoaaina Center 1300K to 900 KI 820 19% Shopping Plaza with Supermarket 821 9.72 Shopping Plaza without Supermarket 821 5.40 1.80 Shoaaina Plaza 821 40% Strip Retail Plaza 822 13.24 WAS Factory Oufiet Center 823 1.94 Auto mobile Sales (New) 840 2.65 1.to Auto mobile Sales (Used) 841 4.92 2.27 Automobile Parts Sales 843 5.88 4.27 43% Tire Store 848 3.72 3.05 25% Supermarket 8W 9.19 3.37 24% Convenience Store 851 53.51 34.33 Convenience Marketwith Gasoline Pumps 853 Discount Supermarket 854 Discount Club 857 4.62 3.49 34% Sporting Goods Superstore 861 2.58 0.93 Ho- rho ovement Superstore 862 3.21 42% Electronics Superstore 863 4.48 40% Pet SuppN Superstore 866 2.19 Book Superstore 868 14.00 Department Store 875 2.81 Apparel Store 876 4.20 Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive Through Window BED 8.62 53% Pharmocv/Drugstore with Drive Through Window 881 11.23 7.79 49% Marti... Dispensary 882 24.57 Furniture Store 890 0.70 1.01 53% Liauor Store 899 17.00 5.98 Gasoline/Service Station 944 28.39 57% Convenience Store/Gas Stafion (none) 945 21.31 Convenience Store/Gas Station l9- 15 vehicle fueling positions) 945 56.38 75% Average 9.54 6.87 38% Median 4.97 3.30 37% Service Data Center 160 0.13 Specialty Trade Contactor 1ED 2.18 0.80 Movie Theatre 445 14.06 9.56 Health/Fitness Club 492 3.92 Dal e Center 565 11.82 4.66 44% Hospital 610 0.98 0.33 Nursing Home 620 0.82 0.45 Clinic 630 4.22 2.49 Animal Hospital/Vetennary Clinic 640 3.83 2.26 Free Standina Emeraencv Room 65D 2.24 Small Office Buildina 712 3.15 1.90 MedIc1'1Denfist Office Buildina (Stand -Alone) 720 4.79 1.26 Medic. Dentist Office Buildina)Within/Near Hospital Campus) 720 3.78 1.03 Walk-in Bank 911 26.40 6.18 Drive-in Bank 912 20.92 4.38 35% Hair Salon 918 1.94 Copy, Print and Express Ship Store 920 12.30 6.63 Fast Casual Restaurant 930 18.57 Fine Dining Restauranl 931 8.28 1.79 44% Hot Turnover MirDown)Restaurant 932 16.35 3.66 43% Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through Drive 50.94 5.45 55% Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Through No Seating 935 31% Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Throuah 937 43.65 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive Throuah No Seafina 938 98% Quick Lube Vehicle Shop 941 9.42 2.17 Auto mobile Care Center 942 3.51 1.43 Automobile Parts and Service Center 943 2.61 1.80 Wine Tasting Room 970 6.60 Brewery Tap Room 971 10.93 Drinkina Place 975 15.53 Average 10.85 3.06 50% Median 5.70 2.17 44% GovernmeM/Publle Sector Recreational Community Center 495 2.53 2.71 Element.' School 520 4.60 Middle/Junior Hiah School 522 4.83 Hint School 525 3.32 School District Office 528 2.37 0.84 Private School (K-e) 530 5.72 Private School IK-12) 532 2.82 Private Hiah School 534 2.49 Charter Elementary School 536 10.64 Charter School (K-12) 538 10.66 Junior/Community Colleae 540 1.63 University/Colleae 550 0.81 Adult Detention Facility 571 0.94 0.51 Libra' 590 8.53 6.81 Government Office Buildina 730 3.19 0.91 State Motor Vehicles Department 731 7.68 4.27 Post Office 732 I5.11 3.29 Average 5.76 3.93 Median 3.19 3.29 Notes: *-Average weektlav PM Deak hour of generator trio entl tlatg tlerivetl from IIE Trio Generation Manual II Ith Etlitionl. Semembe, 2021 "- Aver... weekd.v PM Degk..,s-bv MD rates derived from ITE Trio Generation Manual II I its Etlitionl. September 2021 EXHIBIT L-5 Land Use Density Conversion Factors for the Long -Range Corridor Study San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, Table 8 Cordoba Corporation/Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. (PBQD), August 20, 1990. WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 BUSINESS BY LAND USE Manufacturing/Industrial TABLE 8 EMPLOYEES PER ACRE RIVERSIDE COUNTY Employees * Floor Space Square Feet Average �E;mployeesSq. Ft. Per Employee F.A. R Acre 40,383 23,968,000 594 0.251 18 Heavy Manufacturing 6,379 5,117,000 802 0.20 11 General Manufacturing 14,603 6,103,000 526 0.20 17 Light Manufacturing 8,624 3,962,000 459 0.25 24 Manufacturing, Small Module 5,559 3,038,000 547 0.25 20 Iligh Tech Activity and Research 954 411,000 431 0.35 35 Wholesale Trade Industrial 6,120 4,140,000 676 0.25 16 Warehousing 119 279,000 2,345 0.25 5 General Industrial 1,023 917,000 896 0.20 10 Commercial 79,067 46,304,000 586 0.30 1 22 Retail Trade 34,821 20,125,000 578 0.30 23 Restaurants and Bars 23,345 4,061,000 174 0.30 75 Personnal, Rental and Repair Services 3,452 1,590,000 461 0.30 28 Automotive Repair Services 1,870 1,619,000 866 0.30 15 Equipment Rental 1,080 453,000 419 0.30 31 Wholesale, Trade Commercial 1,521 1,434,000 943 0.25 12 General Commercial 12,978 17,023,000 1,312 0.40 13 Office 41,740 12,226,000 293 0.501 74 Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 7,738 1,095,000 142 0.50 154 Finance/Insurance/RE/Small Office 3,945 548,000 139 0.50 157 Professional Services 5,470 1,529,000 280 0.50 78 Business Services 6,680 1,966,000 294 0.50 74 General Office 8,900 3,886,000 437 0.50 50 Medical Services 9,006 3,201,000 355 0.50 61 * Employment figures do not include government, military and sole proprietorships. Source: Urban Decision Systems (1989), Census Zip Business Patterns (1986) Filename: Trans ry .1 0 EXHIBIT L-b Orange County Subarea Modeling Guidelines Manual, Appendix C Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) June 2001 WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 i 1r o F-- L] LL z w z r a v� H m w V a w Q BE rBE r i 1 1 I y L o 00 CDo p. o 0 C 0 a 0 0 C Qi q o a C O G o � 1 �7 ' I j p o C7 I o a C o 0 0 ccpaOa ram+ ❑ 0 p o r r - p o oa paa o r o O o r y a( O W N O C) a G v L Oi o (Dpo 0 0 0 0QQ � p o 0Qa 0 0 IL CY) �r-tiao O �-aQa- o m m aao, - P,00 a a ��RRa�a Ooo- moo a 0C)o H CD co co r C a) E p R 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 �+�+ ��J ;'ooOrj 00 u o o OOQo 0 0 W d p p O O O o 0 O O 'C� 0 1 0 O O O oa a O m U_U- U- L.LLsL U- U- U- U- E m 0 0 a) as uyv)cncnco (nU)(n o-0 (; ci N 4)maa��aa��mlv�Q)a)a)v� a) a) m N m al m 4) m N V7 N vi u1 E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E O ❑ 0 0 0 w w w 0 0 (1) E - 0 w w Q) o LOoaavoo aaa,n m�aa0 ►n G] CVIT C7 N N lf3 � C) rq ! T a O O CD > I1111 1 I11 iiI I I o,s f r- C LC]DOQOOaa0O� cNou�aQa0a0LO�pp�Ln0ol I'OO�f7r V N C"] N N T- M C) M N p p.a a - 0 0 O �C L co CL W i n' c m W I!1 U [a m o' a) U M 0 0 cm] w L a0s y a� ca Q co [] is Q, :3 m !G w c m v[, — m a O❑m> 0ca�' o � o U] y.LU >mAE.y > cl 0 Yco O ❑�=�=�Ca cO m �[6I a) O ❑ O ¢J m 2 07 U) 0 Ia U) D L H 1 EXHIBIT L-7 Employment Density Study, Table IIB Southern California, October 31, 2001 WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 Table II -A Derivation of Square Feet per Employee Based on: --MEDIAN EMPLOYEES PER ACRE --MEDIAN FAR Land Use Category Los Angeles Orange San Riverside Bernardino Ventura Square Feet per Employee Imperial Region Regional Retail -- 2,322 165 1,392 990 -- 1,023 Other Retail/Svc. 730 450 1,148 432 412 796 585 Low -Rise Office 471 352 598 1,014 659 415 466 High -Rise Office 377 235 -- -- 300 Hotel/Motel 1,179 5,273 1,747 -- 808 1,804 R & D/Flex Space 1,717 511 1,121 1,833 277 -- 527 Light Manufacturing 1,214 786 2,221 1,538 202 2,230 924 Heavy Manufacuring -- -- -- -- -- Warehouse 1,518 1,350 819 2,111 149 3,257 1,225 Government Offices 2,182 408 1,475 851 120 407 672 Table II-B Derivation of Square Feet per Employee Based on: --AVERAGE EMPLOYEES PER ACRE --AVERAGE FAR Land Use Category Los Angeles Orange San Riverside Bernardino Ventura Square Feet per Employee Imperial Region Regional Retail -- 704 268 1,009 1,165 -- 857 Other Retail/Svc. 424 325 629 124 271 255 344 Low -Rise Office 319 287 481 697 389 632 288 High -Rise Office 440 218 -- -- 311 Hotel/Motel -- 3,476 2,544 -- 311 1,152 R & D/Flex Space 1,796 466 867 834 269 -- 344 Light Manufacturing 829 558 1,548 705 189 994 439 Heavy Manufacuring -- -- -- Warehouse 1,518 979 581 1,195 131 450 814 Government Offices 1,442 206 208 188 94 322 261 Notes: = Data not available. THE NATELSON COMPANY, INC. Summary Report - Page 4 Employment Density Study EXHIBIT L-8 General Plan, As Amended December 15, 2015. Appendix E: Socioeconomic Build -Out Projections Assumptions & Methodology, Table E-5 County of Riverside, 2015 WRCOG Adopted by WRCOG Executive Committee TUMF Nexus Study - 2024 Program Update September 9, 2024 County of Riverside General Plan Al Socioeconomic Build -out Assumptions and Methodolog y fLRMXINo c..+i N[Ni Table E-3: Net Parcel Acre Factors Land Use Designation Net Parcel Area Commercial Retail (CR) 0.75 Commercial Tourist (CT) 0.75 Commercial Office (CO) 0.75 Light Industrial (LI) 0.80 Heavy Industrial (HI) 0.75 Business Park (BP) 0.75 Net Parcel Square Feet: To convert net acres to net square feet, net acres are multiplied by 43,560 feet per acre. For example, 50 net acres of Commercial Office (66.66 gross acres) equals 2,178,000 net square feet. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): Floor Area Ratio, or FAR, indicates the ratio of gross building square footage permitted on a parcel to net square footage of the parcel. FAR's for Commercial, Industrial and Business Park land uses are identified, in Table E-4, below. See General Plan Glossary for full definition of FAR. Table E-4: Development FAR Factors Land Use Designation FAR Minimum Probable* Maximum Commercial Retail CR 0.20 0.23 0.35 Commercial Tourist CT 0.20 0.25 0.35 Commercial Office CO 0.25 0.35 1.00 Light Industrial LI 0.25 0.38 0.60 Heavy Industrial HI 0.15 0.40 0.50 Business Park BP 0.25 0.30 0.60 *Factor used for theoretical planning estimates. Building Square Footage: Building square footage for the land use designations listed in the table above are calculated by multiplying the Net Square Feet of each land use designation by the corresponding FAR. For instance, 20,000 square feet of Commercial Retail with an FAR of 0.23 would yield 4,600 square feet of building space. Square Feet (SF)/Employee Factor: This factor indicates the number of employees typically associated with a given amount of square feet of building space per employee. It is used to estimate the number of jobs resulting for a given land use designation. These factors for the commercial land use designations are listed in Table E-5 below. Table E-5: Commercial Employment Factors Land Use Designation SF/Employee Commercial Retail (CR)* 500 Commercial Tourist (CT) 500 Commercial Office (CO) 300 Light Industrial (LI) 1,030 Heavy Industrial (HI) 1,500 Business Park (BP) 600 *It is assumed that CR designated lands will build out at 40% CR and 60% MDR. Employment: Employment for commercial, industrial, and business park land uses is calculated by dividing the total number of building square feet by the SF/Employee factor. For example, 300,000 square feet of commercial office building space would yield 1,000 employees. Appendix E-1 Page 3 December 8, 2015 County of Riverside General Plan Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: Adopt a resolution amending the applicable Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) applicable to all developments in the City of Temecula. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council will make a finding that the proposed ordinance and resolution are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines and that there is no possibility that the ordinance and resolution would have a significant impact on the environment. PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 DATE OF HEARING: February 11, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul an ordinance, resolution, or motion adopting a new fee or service charge, or modifying or amending an existing fee or service charge, adopted by the City Council shall be commenced within 120 days of the effective date of the ordinance, resolution, or motion. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Public Works Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to Ron Moreno, City of Temecula Public Works Department, (951) 694-6411. Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Ron Moreno, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Introduce Ordinance Amending the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program to Update Participation PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, TO UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: Proposed amendment to the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ordinance to update participation and revise format. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a Member Agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and eighteen (18) cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, in 2002-2003, WRCOG member jurisdictions developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials due to new development in Western Riverside County could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial, and industrial development. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program. The proposed ordinance would amend Chapter 15.08 to include the 2024 Nexus Study and consolidate all related information. FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the proposed amendment will have no fiscal impacts. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 2. Notice of Public Hearing ORDINANCE NO.2025- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM, TO UPDATE PARTICIPATION IN THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM CEQA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Chapter 15.08, Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program ("TUMF"), is here by amended and restated in full to read as follows: § 15.08.010. Title. This chapter shall be known as the "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program of 2025." § 15.08.020. Findings. In adopting this chapter, the city council finds and determines that: A. The city is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the county of Riverside and eighteen cities located in Western Riverside County. B. Acting in concert, the WRCOG member agencies developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System") could be made up in part by a transportation uniform mitigation fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial and industrial development. A map depicting the boundaries of Western Riverside County and the Regional System is on file in the Office of the City Clerk. C. As a Member Agency of WRCOG and as a TUMF participating jurisdiction, the city participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study," dated October 18, 2002 (the "2002 Nexus Study") prepared in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000 et seq.) and adopted by the WRCOG executive committee. D. The city also participated in the second major update of the TUMF network entitled the "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study; 2009 Update" ("2009 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. Based on the 2002 and 2009 Nexus Studies, the City Council adopted and implemented ordinances amending this Chapter and authorizing the city's participation in a TUMF program. E. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF participating jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG executive committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF program and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF program. The City Council adopted and implemented an ordinance amending this Chapter to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF and adopt the 2016 Nexus Study. F. In 2018, the TUMF Program was altered to adopt a process in which WRCOG calculates and collects TUMF on behalf of member agencies under the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program Ordinance of 2018. The City adopted an ordinance amending this Chapter and allowing WRCOG to calculate and collect TUMF on behalf of the City. G. WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Participating Jurisdictions, has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update" ("2024 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On September 9, 2024, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2024 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF Participating Jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program. H. Consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of ordinances amending this Chapter, the city council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds and determines, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable levels of service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF program is essential. L The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied. J. The City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship 2 between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF. K. The City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2024 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development. L. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter 15.08 shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2024 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements. M. The city council finds and determines that the 2024 Nexus Study proposes a fair and equitable method for distributing a portion of the unfunded costs of improvements and facilities to the Regional System. N. The City Council hereby adopts the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2024 Update and its findings, a true, correct and complete copy of which is on file with the Office of the City Clerk. § 15.08.030. Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, the following words, terms and phrases shall have the following meanings: A. "Class A office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on - site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to, a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class A office shall be as follows: (1) minimum of three stories (exception will be made for March JPA, where height requirements exist); (2) minimum of ten thousand square feet per floor; (3) steel frame construction; (4) central, interior lobby; and (5) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building. B. "Class B office" means an office building that is typically characterized by high quality design, use of high end building materials, state of the art technology for voice and data, on - site support services/maintenance, and often includes full service ancillary uses such as, but not limited to, a bank, restaurant/office coffee shop, health club, printing shop, and reserved 3 parking. The minimum requirements of an office building classified as Class B office shall be as follows: (1) minimum of two stories; (2) minimum of fifteen thousand square feet per floor; (3) steel frame, concrete or masonry shell construction; (4) central, interior lobby; and (5) access to suites shall be from inside the building unless the building is located in a central business district with major foot traffic, in which case the first floor may be accessed from the street to provide entrances/exits for commercial uses within the building. C. "Development project" or "project" means any project undertaken for the purposes of development, including the issuance of a permit for construction. D. 'Disabled veteran" means any veteran who is retired or is in process of medical retirement from military service who is or was severely injured in a theatre of combat operations and has or received a letter of eligibility for the Veterans Administration Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant Program. E. "Government/public buildings, public schools and public facilities" means any owned and operated facilities by a government entity in accordance with Section 15.08.040(F), Exemptions. A new development that is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency for government/ public buildings, public schools, and public facilities shall apply only if all of the following conditions are met: 1. The new development being constructed is subject to a long-term lease with a government agency. 2. The project shall have a deed restriction placed on the property that limits the use to government/public facility for the term of the lease, including all extension options, for a period of not less than twenty (20) years. Any change in the use of the facility from government shall trigger the payment of the TUMF in effect at the time of the change is made. 3. No less than ninety percent (90%) of the total square footage of the building is leased to the government agency during the term of deed restriction the long term and any extensions thereof. 4. The new development is constructed at prevailing wage rates. 5. A copy of the lease is provided to the applicable jurisdiction and to WRCOG. 6. Based on the facts and circumstances WRCOG determines that the intent of the lease is to provide for a long-term government use, and not to evade payment of TUMF. F. "Gross acreage" means the total property area as shown on a land division of a map of record, or described through a recorded legal description of the property. This area shall be bounded by road rights of way and property lines. G. "Guest dwellings" and "detached second units" according to the State of California legal definition as following: 1) Complies with the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook and 2) Are ministerially approved by each jurisdiction's local codes. H. "Habitable structure" means any structure or part thereof where persons reside, congregate or work and which is legally occupied in whole or part in accordance with applicable building codes, and state and local laws. I. "Industrial project" means any development project that proposes any industrial or manufacturing use allowed within certain zones by Title 17, Zoning of the Temecula Municipal Code, including Business Park Zone (BP), Light Industrial District Zone (LI), a specific plan providing for industrial or manufacturing uses, or a planned development overlay district providing for industrial or manufacturing uses. J. "Long-term lease" as used in the TUMF program, shall mean a lease with a term of no less than twenty years. K. "Low income residential housing" means "residential affordable units": (1) for rental housing, the units shall be made available, rented and restricted to "lower income households" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5) at an "affordable rent" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50053); and (2) for for -sale housing, the units shall be sold to "persons or families of low or moderate income" (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50093) at a purchase price that will not cause the purchaser's monthly housing cost to exceed "affordable housing cost (as defined in Health and Safety Code Section 50052.5). Affordable units that are rental housing shall be made available, rented, and restricted to lower income households at an affordable rent for a period of at least fifty-five years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new residential development. Affordable units that are for -sale housing units shall be restricted to ownership by persons and families of low or moderate income for at least forty-five years after the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new residential development. L. "Mixed -use development," as used in the TUMF program, means developments with the following criteria: (1) three or more significant revenue -producing uses; and (2) significant physical and functional integration of project components. M. "Multi -family residential unit" means a structure with two (2) or more legal independent residential dwelling units intended for human habitation. N. "Non-profit organization" means an organization operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial port of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. For the purposes of the TUMF program, the non-profit may be a 501(c)(3) charitable organization as defined by the Internal Revenue Service. O. "Nonresidential unit" means retail commercial, service commercial and industrial development which is designed primarily for non -dwelling use, but shall include hotels and motels. P. "Recognized financing district" means a financing district as defined in the TUMF administrative plan as may be amended from time to time. Q. "Residential dwelling unit" means a building or portion thereof used by one family and containing but one kitchen, which is designed primarily for residential occupancy including single-family and multifamily dwellings. "Residential dwelling unit" shall not include hotels or motels. R. "Retail commercial project" means any development project that proposes any retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project allowed within certain zones by Title 17, Zoning, of the Temecula Municipal Code, including Neighborhood Commercial Zone (NP), Community Commercial Zone (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial Zone (HT) and Service Commercial Zone (SC), Professional Office Zone (PO), Business Park Zone (BP) a specific plan providing for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, or a planned development overlay district providing for retail commercial activity use not defined as a service commercial project, which can include any eating/dining facility residing on the retail commercial development premises. S. "Service commercial project" means any development project that is predominately dedicated to business activities associated with professional or administrative services, and typically consists of corporate offices, financial institutions, legal, and medical offices eating/dining facilities, and other uses related to personal or professional services. T. "Single-family residential unit" means each residential dwelling unit development which is situated on one lot which shares no common wall, foundation, or other interconnection with another dwelling unit. U. "TUMF participating jurisdiction" means a jurisdiction in Western Riverside County which has adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing participation in the TUMF program and complies with all regulations established in the TUMF administrative plan, as adopted and amended from time to time by the WRCOG. V. "TUMF administrative plan" means that the TUMF administration plan adopted by the WRCOG executive committee May 5, 2003, as amended, setting forth detailed administration procedures and requirements for the TUMF program. § 15.08.040. Establishment of the transportation uniform mitigation fee. A. Adoption of TUMF Schedule. The city council shall adopt an applicable TUMF schedule through a separate resolution, which may be amended from time to time. B. Fee Calculation. The fees shall be calculated by WRCOG according to the calculation methodology fee set forth in the WRCOG TUMF Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. In addition to data in the Fee Calculation Handbook, WRCOG Staff may consider the following items when establishing the appropriate fee calculation methodology: 1. Underlying zoning of the site; 2. Land -use classifications in the latest Nexus Study; 3. Project specific traffic studies; 4. Latest standardized reference manuals such as the Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual; 5. Previous TUMF calculations for similar uses; 6. WRCOG staff shall approve final draft credit/reimbursement agreement prior to execution. WRCOG shall have final determination regarding the appropriate methodology to calculate the fee based on the information provided by the local agency. In case of a conflict between the applicant, WRCOG, and/or the local agency regarding the fee calculation methodology, the dispute resolution process in the TUMF administrative plan will apply. C. Fee Adjustment. The fee schedule may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted by the WRCOG executive committee. By amendment to the resolution referenced in subsection A, the fees may be increased or decreased to reflect the changes in actual and estimated costs of the Regional System including, but not limited to, debt service, lease payments and construction costs. The adjustment of the fees may also reflect changes in the facilities required to be constructed, in estimated revenues received pursuant to this chapter, as well as the availability or lack thereof of other funds with which to construct the Regional System. WRCOG shall review the TUMF program no less than every four years after 2025. D. Purpose. The purpose of the TUMF is to fund those certain improvements to the Regional System as depicted in "Exhibit A" and identified in "Exhibit B" of the 2024 Nexus Study. E. Applicability. The TUMF shall apply to all new development within the city, unless otherwise exempt hereunder. F. Exemptions. The following types of new development shall be exempt from the provisions of this chapter and in the TUMF administrative plan: 1. Low income residential housing as described in Section 15.08.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan. 2. Government/public buildings, public schools, and public facilities as described in Section 15.08.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan. Airports that are public use airports and are appropriately permitted by Caltrans or other state agency. 3. Development projects which are the subject of a public facilities development agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq., prior May 28, 2003, the effective date of Ordinance No. 03-01, wherein the imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited, provided that if the term of such a development agreement is extended by amendment or by any other manner after May 28, 2003, the TUMF shall be imposed. 4. The rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of any habitable structure in use on or after January 1, 2000, provided that the same or fewer traffic trips are generated as a result thereof. 5. Guest dwellings and detached second units as described in Section 15.08.030, Definitions, and in the TUMF administrative plan. 6. Kennels (including catteries) established in connection with an existing single- family residential unit. 7. Any sanctuary, or other activity under the same roof of a church or other house of worship that is not revenue generating and is eligible for a property tax exemption (excluding concert venues, coffee/snack shops, book stores, for -profit pre-school day- cares, etc., which would be assessed TUMF.) 8. Any nonprofit corporation or nonprofit organization offering and conducting full- time day school at the elementary, middle school or high school level for students between the ages of five and eighteen years. 9. New single-family homes, constructed by non-profit organizations, specially adapted and designed for maximum freedom of movement and independent living for qualified "disabled veterans," as defined in Section 15.08.030, Definitions. 10. Other uses may be exempt as determined by the WRCOG executive committee as further defined in the TUMF administrative plan. G. Credit. Regional System improvements may be credited toward the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF administrative plan and the following: Regional Tier. a. Arterial Credits. If a developer constructs arterial improvements identified on the Regional System, the developer shall receive credit for all costs associated with the arterial component based on approved Nexus Study for the Regional System effective at the time the credit agreement is entered into. WRCOG staff must pre -approve any credit agreements that deviate from the standard WRCOG approved format. b. Other Credits. In special circumstances, when a developer constructs off -site improvements such as an interchange, bridge, or railroad grade separation, credits shall be determined by WRCOG and the city in consultation with the developer. All such credits must have prior written approval from WRCOG. c. The amount of the development fee credit shall not exceed the maximum amount determined by the Nexus Study for the Regional System at the time the credit agreement is entered into or actual costs, whichever is less. 2. Local Tier. a. The local jurisdictions shall compare facilities in local fee programs against the Regional System and eliminate any overlap in its local fee program except where there is a recognized financing district has been established. b. If there is a recognized financing district established, the local agency may credit that portion of the facility identified in both programs against the TUMF in accordance with the TUMF administrative plan. § 15.08.050. Reimbursements. Should the developer construct Regional System improvements in excess of the TUMF fee obligation, the developer may be reimbursed based on actual costs or the approved Nexus Study effective at the time the agreement was entered into, whichever is less. Reimbursements shall be enacted through an agreement between the developer and the city, contingent on funds being available and approved by WRCOG. In all cases, however, reimbursements under such special agreements must coincide with construction of the transportation improvements as scheduled in the five-year Zone Transportation Improvement Program's adopted annually by WRCOG. § 15.08.060. Procedures for the levy, collection and disposition of fees. A. Authority of the Building Department. The director of building and safety, or designee, is hereby authorized to provide WRCOG with development project specifics for the calculation of TUMF in a manner consistent with the TUMF administrative plan. B. Payment. Payment of the fees shall be as follows: 1. All fees collected hereunder shall be collected by WRCOG for deposit, investment, accounting and expenditure in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, TUMF administrative plan, and the Mitigation Fee Act. 2. The fees shall be paid at the time a certificate of occupancy is issued for the development project or upon final inspection, whichever comes first (the "payment date"). However this section should not be construed to prevent payment of the fees prior to issuance of an occupancy permit or final inspection. Fees may be paid at the issuance of a building permit, and the fee payment shall be calculated based on the fee in effect at that time, provided the developer tenders the full amount of his or her TUMF obligation. If the developer makes only a partial payment prior to the Payment Date, the amount of the fee due shall be based on the TUMF fee schedule in place on the Payment Date. The fees shall be calculated according to fee schedule set forth in this chapter, or resolution adopted pursuant thereto, and the calculation methodology set forth in the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time. 3. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee amounts in effect at the time of payment is due under this chapter, not the date the ordinance adopting this chapter, or any amendment thereto, is initially adopted. The city shall not enter into a development agreement which freezes future adjustments of the TUMF. 4. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee, the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of the fee. The obligation to pay the fee shall run with the land and be binding on all the successors in interest to the property. 5. Fees shall not be waived. C. Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The city shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for any development project until WRCOG has provided written evidence that it has collected the fee. D. Appeals. Appeals shall be filed with WRCOG in accordance with the provisions of the TUMF administrative plan. Appealable issues shall be the application of the fee, application of credits, application of reimbursement, application of the legal action stay and application of exemption. E. Reports to WRCOG. The director of building and safety, or designee, shall prepare and deliver to the executive director of WRCOG, periodic reports as will be established under Section 15.08.070 of this chapter. § 15.08.070. Appointment of the TUMF administrator. A. WRCOG is hereby appointed as the administrator of the transportation uniform mitigation fee program. WRCOG is hereby authorized to collect all fees generated from the TUMF within the city, and to invest, account for and expend such fees in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and the Mitigation Fee Act. The detailed administrative procedures concerning the implementation of this chapter shall be contained in the TUMF Administrative Plan. Furthermore, the TUMF administrator shall use the Fee Calculation Handbook adopted July 14, 2003, as amended from time to time, for the purpose of calculating a developer's TUMF obligation. In addition to detailing the methodology for calculating all TUMF obligations of different categories of new development, the purpose of the Fee Calculation Handbook is to clarify for the TUMF administrator, where necessary, the definition and calculation methodology for uses not clearly defined in the respective TUMF ordinances. B. WRCOG shall expend only that amount of the funds generated from the TUMF for staff support, audit, administrative expenses, and contract services that are necessary and reasonable to carry out its responsibilities and in no case shall the funds expended for salaries and benefits exceed one percent of the revenue raised by the TUMF program. The TUMF administrative plan further outlines the fiscal responsibilities and limitations of the administrator. § 15.08.080. Effect. No provisions of this chapter shall entitle any person who has already paid the TUMF to receive a refund, credit or reimbursement of such payment. This chapter does not create any new TUMF. SECTION 2. PROCEDURAL FINDINGS. The City Council does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 11, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the 2024 Nexus Study, this Ordinance amending Chapter 15.08, and the TUMF fees set forth in Resolution No. 2025-. The public hearing was noticed by publication in a newspaper of general circulation at least ten (10) days prior to this hearing. The City made the following documents available to the public on the City's website at least ten (10) days prior to the public 10 hearing: 1) 2024 Nexus Study; 2) this Ordinance amending Chapter 15.08; 3) the Resolution approving the new TUMF fees; and 4) other data and information concerning the new TUMF. B. On January 27, 2025, the City mailed a Notice of the Public Hearing to interested parties who had filed a written request with the City for mailed notice of the meeting on new or increased fees or service charges within the previous twelve (12) months. C. The City Council duly considered data and information provided by the public and City Staff at the public hearing relative to the cost of the improvements and facilities for which the TUMF is proposed and all other comments, whether written or oral, submitted prior to the conclusion of the public hearing. SECTION 3. CEQA. The amendments to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Program as described in this Ordinance is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The Ordinance does not approve the construction nor cause the construction of any specific transportation improvements within Riverside County. This Ordinance will have no effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(d) and 15062, a Notice of Exemption will be prepared, executed and filed for the foregoing determination in the manner required by law, that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. If any one or more of the terms, provisions or sections of this Ordinance shall to any extent be judged invalid, unenforceable and/or voidable for any reason whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdiction, then each and all of the remaining terms, provisions and sections of this Ordinance shall not be affected thereby and shall be valid and enforceable. SECTION 5. JUDICIAL REVIEW. In accordance with State law, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this Ordinance shall be commenced within the time limits set forth in Government Code Section 66022. SECTION 6. CERTIFICATION. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after passage. m PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Brenden Kalfus, Mayor 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2025- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 111h day of February, 2025, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 13 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: Adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 15.08, Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program to update participation and revise format. Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council will make a finding that the proposed ordinance and resolution are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines and that there is no possibility that the ordinance and resolution would have a significant impact on the environment. PLACE OF HEARING: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 DATE OF HEARING: February 11, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66022, any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul an ordinance, resolution, or motion adopting a new fee or service charge, or modifying or amending an existing fee or service charge, adopted by the City Council shall be commenced within 120 days of the effective date of the ordinance, resolution, or motion. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Public Works Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to Ron Moreno, City of Temecula Public Works Department, (951) 694-6411. Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: February 11, 2025 SUBJECT: Consider Topic of Proposed Safety and Security Plan Measures at City Hall and Provide General Direction Regarding the Same (At the Request of Council Member Schwank) PREPARED BY: Kevin Hawkins, Assistant City Manager Lt. Vic Pierson, RSO RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council consider the topic of proposed safety and security plan measures at City Hall and provide general direction regarding the same. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has placed a premium on public safety as a foundational component to our high quality of life. That same practical approach to safety has also been a point of emphasis for members of the public and staff that work, visit, and do business here at the Temecula City Hall. Since 2021, the City Council has tirelessly supported enhanced/proactive safety measures in City Hall, which includes: • In conjunction with Riverside County Sheriff's Office (RSO), the hiring of a specialized deputy located in the City Manager's Office, providing a direct safety presence and support to the civic center workforce • Creation of a Community Outreach, Resource & Engagement team, which focuses on quality -of -life issues, operating out of City Hall and • Active Shooter Training with components of A.L.LC.E. (A - Alert • L - Lockdown • I - Inform • C - Counter • E — Evacuate). Given the location of RSO personnel in the civic center area, building security is no longer just limited to the safety of the general public, City employees, and elected officials but now extends to the safety and security of law enforcement personnel. While workplace incidents, such as the threat of an active shooter attack are unpredictable, the threat is still very real. Designed for aesthetics and not necessarily from a safety perspective, RSO leadership was approached to provide an internal facility/risk assessment and provide recommendations for improving City Hall security. Like other public buildings, such as county facilities, courthouses, etc., this effort was a logical next step to the aforementioned measures, which would also explore the viability of security weapons detection technology, to include but not limited to walk-through metal detectors and contracted security personnel. Another driver of this effort was Senate Bill 2 (S132), which took effect on January 1, 2024. Some portions of the new law have been bouncing back and forth in court but the hotly contested sections include restrictions on where someone with a CCW license can carry a concealed firearm, with a temporary injunction regarding the "sensitive places" restrictions occurring last September. Moreover, the "good moral character" requirement is no longer in the law, replaced by "reasonably likely to be a danger." The City of Temecula does not allow employees to carry weapons in the workplace, which the City's Workplace Violence Policy provides that authority. It is also recommended that any policy or practice related to CCWs be equally applied to City staff, City Council and City Commissioners. Beginning in August of 2024 - January of 2025, members of the City Council received 1:1 briefings from RSO and City staff regarding the internal assessment that resulted in the proposed measures. This item comes at the request of Council Member Schwank, which reinforces the urgency to enhance the security and confidence in safety at all public meetings (Council, Boards, Commissions, etc.) and operations that occur out of City Hall. It should be noted that the City Executive Team has provided input and overwhelming support, as well as Union stewards/personnel with broader application and benefits for events and activities in the civic center area. FISCAL IMPACT: Based upon implementation, the initial cost for equipment and contract personnel to provide enhanced City Hall security, will range from $250,000 - $300,000. Future operating costs will decrease to $165,000 annually. ATTACHMENTS: Safety and Security Plan for City Hall 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE fisInp Background The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • At the request of the City Manager's Office, Captain Rigali and Lieutenant Pierson were asked to develop a plan to address safety and security at City Hall. • This security plan included walk-through inspections, consulting with SWAT Team members, our personal experiences with critical incidents, and a realistic threat assessment of City Hall. • Cautious versus paranoid mentality. Safety Considerations The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • City Hall is a beautiful building but was not designed entirely from a safety perspective. • Many features, such as the multiple entry / exit doors, the ability to drive vehicles completely around the facility, and exterior glass walls pose security concerns. • The very nature of city government and the reality that not all people are happy with decisions made by elected officials or city employees. ER Current Safety Protocols • Video cameras / key card access. • City Hall has a dedicated deputy sheriff. Aft The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • An RSO Special Team (CORE) is stationed on the second floor of City Hall. • Another RSO Special Team (METRO) is stationed at the Old Town Sheriff's Substation • Deputies are routinely coming and going from City Hall during their shifts. Safety Proposal Key Points • Control the ingress and egress of City Hall. • Designated public and employee entrances and exits. • Review of current entrances and exits used by public and employees. Aft '1 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Point of Entry: City all Public Entrance / Exit -he Heart of Southern California Wine Country Point of Entry: Council Chambers Proposed Employee Entrance / Exit COUNCIL tHAMI3-'-ERS :c Heart of Southern California Wine Country Point of Entry: West Wing Development Services Entry Entrance only used when needed Restroom doors or hallway doors are locked. No dual access. law he Heart of Southern California Wine Country All entrances / exits are on the west side of City Hall. I WAIll IL oil H IP M-7 -low- moo I RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ��1E Rlrcc Safety Proposal Eq1 ' Metal Detectors Walk -Through Metal Detector Quickly detects guns, knives and razor blades at schools, concerts, night clubs and government buildings. • Portable and easy to use. 5-minute setup with no tools required. • Operates up to 40 hours on rechargeable 12V batteries. No cords needed. • 3 sensor zones with LED indicators provide head -to - toe detection. • Carry strap and 2 wheels make transportation quick and easy. • 100 sensitivity settings. Can be adjusted to pick up items as small as a bobby pin. * Free Offer Q More Images `f `l a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Each entrance has a dedicated metal detector. Approximate price is $5k per machine. Total of 3 needed. Safety Proposal Equipment Wands Cost is $250.00 each. Each screening station should have two wands (6 total). :c Heart of Southern California Wine Country '1 • he Heart of Southern California Safety Wine Country X-ray machine C Price varies depending on make, model, and size. • Average cost ranges from $SOk to $75k. Suggested location is the lobby to Council Chambers. E Rlc�, fi sIDE Safety Proposal '1 The Heart of 5outhern California Wine Country • Contracted private security services will be appointed to operate the proposed entrances into City Hall. • RSO's Court Services Division has a professional services agreement with Allied Universal. Cost per hour, per security guard, is $25.67 • A minimum of 3 security guards are needed to operate the employee and public entrances. • Three guards, 40-hours a week, approximately $3,080.40. • Additional security will be needed if the conference center is occupied, and for council and commission meetings. Safety Proposal Additional Considerations for Security Personnel • Workstations: Rubber floor mats, chairs, small desk at or near entrances. • Access to a break room for lunch / breaks. • Communication will be between security and RSO Personnel. The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • Lieutenant Pierson will be responsible for supervising and managing security personnel. ITEMS'' T ALLOW IN c�-T � THAT T47 Handbags, boxes and all personal containers vui11 be searched for weapons or items deemed a potential secttnty concern. •,Alchohol and controlled substances, including marijuana . Weapons of any kind s • Knives or box cutlers with any size blade . Nail clippers, nail files and tweezers • Needles or syringes Scissors or razors Knitting needles or crochet hooks • Glass food containers, picture frames and glass objects _ • Metal forks or spoons • Permanent markers • Tear gas, mace or pepper spray Cigarette fighters, matches and fuel Tools of any kind • Wallets with chains Laser pointers Cameras Excessive clothing Any other personal items deemed a seciaity concern listed at . riverside.courmca_gov for this courthouse. w� k *0 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE Additional Considerations • Signage to name the proper entrances / exits. Aft '1 `f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country • Signage informing of the screening process that bags, backpacks, briefcases will be searched. • Stanchions needed to direct and block off areas. ✓ Need to limit key card access / Alarming exterior exit doors. ✓ Conversations with our City Attorney / Employee Union. • Cultural changes with the public and employees. End Goal • All entrances and exits are on the west side of the building. • Any item deemed suspicious is x-rayed at the employee entrance. '1 The Heart of Southern California Wine Country •Consider the use of a cart from public to employee entrance for heavy or bulky items. • Every person inside City Hall has been screened for weapons. • During city council or commission nights, the only point of entry is through Council Chambers where metal detectors and x-ray machine is located. • During city council or commission nights, the only access to the first floor is council chambers. The front lobby is closed. SNER►�,� ��'rIGE GG� Questions? '1 he Heart of Southern California Wine Country REQUESTS TO SPEAK REQUEST TO SPEAK i�--, 1j CITY OF TEMECULA �Aa I/► �1989 l 2� Date: -9 ( Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item:\ Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. I r �,�,` 1 ' Name: ""� Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. °F TFti'f��<i REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: // - . Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: C Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. , // r SA -L ?)/ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium andte state your name for the recor . (`'/ �. Address: , ?/ / -- .�" % < ;-- Email address: ( , (' If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. 4 L / V All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA iyHo in - iy,hiss..stx oe<'r Date: ; Public Comment: Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: Item Description or Item No. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: v C �(v 1 IL 14'( If Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 4 :40140043 "+„ 1989 s,4- 2/I ) Date: Public Comment Non-Agenda Item: Agenda Item: IV Item Description or Item No. 1 S(° 0--ACH Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: ftS Phone Number: . Address: —�— Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.