HomeMy WebLinkAbout02272025 DH AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the
office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting (28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR'S HEARING MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 27, 2025-1:30 PM
CALL TO ORDER:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development
A total of 15 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Director of Community
Development on items that are not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the
speaker chooses to address the Director of Community Development on an item not listed on the
agenda, a Request to Speak form may be filled out and filed with the staff liaison. Once the speaker is
called to speak, please come forward. For all items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form may be
filed with the staff liaison. On those items, each speaker is limited to five minutes.
Item No. 1
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
1:30 PM
PA23-0341
Development Plan
Texas Roadhouse Restaurant
Texas Roadhouse
A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas
Roadhouse restaurant
40710 Winchester Road
No further environmental review required
Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan)
Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)
Scott Cooper, Case Planner
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting
of the agenda), will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center
during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the
City's website at TemeculaCA.gov and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions
regarding an item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.
ITEM NO. 1
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
DIRECTOR'S HEARI NG
TO:
FROM:
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARE D BY:
PROJECT
SUMMARY:
Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development
Scott Cooper, Senior Planner
February 27, 2025
Scott Cooper, Case Planner
Planning Application Number PA23-034 l, a Development Plan for an
approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located
at 40710 Winchester Road
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of
Approval
CEQA: No further environmental review required
Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan)
Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations)
PROJECT DATA SUMMAR Y
Name of Applicant:
General Plan
Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Texas Roadhouse
Community Commercial (CC)
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP- 7)
Existing Parking Lot/ Community Commercial (CC)
Existing Commercial Buildings / Community Commercial (CC)
Promenade Temecula/ Community Commercial (CC)
Existing Parking Lot/ Community Commercial (CC)
Existing Parking Lot/ Community Commercial (CC)
Existing/Proposed
Landscape Area/Coverage: 18.2%
Parking Provided/Required: 40 Parking Spaces
Min/Max Allowable or Required
15%Minimum
40 Parking Spaces
AFFORDABLE/WORKFORCE HOUSING
Located in Housing Element Vacant Sites Inventory? D Yes IZ! No
Located in Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ)? D Yes IZ! No
AHOZ Gain/Loss: Not Applicable
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On August 24, 2023, Texas Roadhouse submitted a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000
square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project is located within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
which allows for the development of a restaurant. The applicant seeks to construct a new
approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant. The proposed restaurant includes a bar/lounge area
and an outdoor patio dining area
The vehicular access to the project is from existing traffic circulation within the Promenade
Temecula including direct access from Ring Road. Pedestrian access is also provided as there is
an existing cross walk located to the north of the project crossing Ring Road at an existing traffic
signal leading to an accessible route to the front door/waiting area of the restaurant. The project
is required to provide 40 parking spaces for a restaurant use per the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan. The project proposes 40 parking spaces along with motorcycle and bicycle parking.
Architecture
The architectural design of the project features four-sided architecture that incorporates stone,
brick, lap siding, standing seam metal roof, and varying paint colors. The building is
architecturally designed to bring visual interest and articulation to the highly visible portion of the
Promenade Temecula adjacent to Ring Road.
Landscaping
The project would provide 18.2% landscaping which exceeds the rrurumum 15% landscape
requirement of the Specific Plan. Plant types include: Chinese Pistache trees, Spartan Juniper,
Boston Ivy, and Coyote Bush.
Alcohol Service
As this project is located within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan a Conditional Use
Permit allowing for the sale of distilled spirits is not required for this project. The applicant will
2
s t i ll n e e d t o o b t a in t h e p ro p e r C a l ifo rn ia D e p a rt m e n t o f A lc o h o l ic B e v e ra g e C o n t ro l li c e n s e in
o r d e r t o s e r v e w in e , b e e r , a n d d is t i ll e d s p ir it s .
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press-Enterprise on February 14, 2025, and
mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius.
ENVIRONMENT AL DETERMINATION
On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. I to the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan (SP-7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19.
Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved on January 28,
2003 by the adoption of No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan was approved July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment
No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the
adoption of Resolution No. 2025-XX. An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on
September 26, 2006. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the
previously adopted Temecula Regional Center EIR and Addendum. Staff has determined that the
project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed
restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, as
amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that the proposed project
does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the
conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist.
Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the project that will require major
revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the
proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and
Addendum due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information
of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise
of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that:
(a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and
Addendum; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more
severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives
previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one
or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different
from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
The application for a development plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant is
consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is
required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum.
3
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F)
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because a restaurant is an
allowable use within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Therefore,
the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The project is also consistent with
other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Cityw ide Design
Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and
general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other
associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of
those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan,
City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as
conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards
and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS: 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Aerial Map
DH Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Exhibit B - Plan Reductions
Notice of Determination
Notice of Public Hearing
4
9 1 0-420-029 CITY OF TEMECULA PA23-0341
A
1 :2,400 Date Created: 8/29/2023
~
c~
The HNrt of 5oothorn Cal,forn,a
'Wm~ Country
The map PA23-0341 mxd Is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject lo update
and modification. The City of Temecula assurres no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this
map. This map is nol fa reprint or resale. VJSit the City o/ Temecula GIS online at https:/llemeculaca gov/gis
D H RE S O L U T I O N N O . 2 0 2 5 -
A RE S O L U T I O N O F T H E IN T E RI M D I RE C T O R O F
C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T O F T H E C I T Y O F
T E M E C U L A A P P R O V I N G P L A N N I N G A P P L I C A T I O N N O .
P A2 3 -0 3 4 1 , A D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N F O R A N
A P P R O XI M A T E L Y 8 ,0 0 0 S Q U A RE F O O T T E XA S
R O A D H O U S E RE S T A U RA N T L O C A T E D A T 4 0 7 10
W I N C H E S T E R R O A D , A N D M A KI N G A F I N D I N G O F
E XE M P T I O N U N D E R T H E C A L IF O RN IA
E N V I R O N M E N T A L Q U A L I T Y A C T (C E Q A ) (A P N 9 10 -4 2 0 -
0 2 9 )
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Interim Director of Community Development of
the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On August 4, 2023, Texas Roadhouse filed Planning Application No. PA23-0341,
a Development Plan Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan
and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Interim Director of Community Development, at a regular meeting, considered
the Application and environmental review on February 27, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Interim Director of Community Development approved Planning Application No.
PA23-0341 subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application No. P23-0341, conformed to the City ofTemecula's General Plan Development Code.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Interim Director of Community Development, in
approving Planning Application No. PA23-0341, hereby makes the following findings as required
by Development Code Section 17.05.010.F (Development Plan).
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.;
The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation because a
restaurant is an allowable use within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan.
The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local
Ordinances, including the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health
and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with
the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has
been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable
policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development
will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and
welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Interim Director of Community
Developm nt hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in
connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been
determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section
15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative
Declarations);
On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of
Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan
was approved on January 28, 2003 by the adoption of No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment
No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved July 22, 2008 by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-
XX An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on September 26, 2006. The
proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted
Temecula Regional Center EIR and Addendum. Staff has determined that the project is
exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed
restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan,
as amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that the
proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact
Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14
Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by
the project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred
with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that
will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously
identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance,
which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable
diligence at the time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that: (a) the
proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and
Addendum; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially
more severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c) there are mitigation measures or
alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more sign ifi cant effects of the proposed project, but the City
decl ines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or
altern atives which are considerably different fr om those analyzed in the EIR and
Addendum would substantially reduce one or more signifi cant effects on the environment,
but the City decl ines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a
development plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant is consistent with the
project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is required to
meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum.
Section 4. Conditions. The Interim Director of Community Development of the City
of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA23-0341, a Development Plan for an
approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road,
subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, and Plan Reductions set forth on
Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Interim Director of Community Development this 27th day of February, 2025.
Matt Peters
Interim Director of Community Development
I, Denise Jacobo, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that the
forgoing DH Resolution No. 2025- was duly and regularly adopted by the Interim Director of
Community Development of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27th
day of February, 2025
Denise Jacobo, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.:
Project Description:
Assessor's Parcel No.:
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Quimby Category:
New Street In-lieu of Fee:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PA23-0341
A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas
Roadhouse restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road.
910-420-029
Commercial
Service Commercial
Service Commercial/Office
N/A (non-residential project)
N/A (project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area)
February 27, 2025
February 27, 2028
PLANNING DIVISION
Within 48 Hours of the Approval
Page 1 of 17
1. Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption.
APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED:
The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062
within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer
has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will
result in an extended period of time for legal challenges.
FEES:
Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee.
The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions.
FILING:
The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via
email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of
approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be
filed online with the Riverside County Assessor - County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the
CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA.
COPY OF FILINGS:
The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours.
General Requirements
2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and
Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers,
agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials
(collectively "lndemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions,
lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the
Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related
entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy
any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other lndemnitees in
any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of
any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails
to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the lndemnitees. The City shall have the right
to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other
lndemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection
therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be
construed to require the Applicant to indemnify lndemnitees for any claim arising from the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the lndemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall
estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City
or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as
they become due.
Page 2 of 17
3 . E x piratio n. This ap proval shall be used w ithin three years of the appro val date; otherw ise, it
sha ll becom e null and void. Use m e ans the beginning of substantial construction
contem p lated by this appro val w ithin the three year period, w hich is thereafter diligently
pursued to co m p le tio n, or the beginning of substantial utilization contem plated by this
ap proval, or use of a property in conform ance w ith a C onditional Use Perm it.
A m od ificatio n m a de to an appro ved deve lop m ent plan does not affect the original approval
da te of a de ve lo p m e nt plan.
4 . T im e E xt ensio n. T he D irector of C om m unity D evelopm ent m ay, upon an application being
file d prio r to expira tio n, and fo r good cause, grant a tim e ext ension of up to five (5) extensions
of tim e , one ye a r at a tim e .
A m od ificatio n m a de to an appro ved deve lop m ent plan does not affect the original approval
date of a de ve lo pm e nt plan.
5. C o nsiste ncy w ith S pe cific Plans. This pro je ct and all subsequent pro jects w ithin this site shall
be co nsistent w ith Tem ecula Regional C e nter Specific Plan.
6 . C o nform ance w ith A p pro ved Plans. The de velopm ent of the prem ises shall substantially
confo rm to the ap p ro ved site plan and elevations contained on file w ith the Planning D ivision.
7 . S ig nage P e rm its. A se parate building pe rm it shall be required fo r all signage.
8 . Landscape M a intena nce. Landscaping installed fo r the project shall be continuously
m a intaine d to the re asonable satisfactio n of the D irector of C om m unity Developm ent. If it is
dete rm ine d tha t the la ndscaping is not be ing m aintained, the D irector of C om m unity
D eve lo p m e nt sha ll have the authority to require the property ow ner to bring the landscaping
into confo rm a nce w ith the appro ved landscape plan. The continued m aintenance of all
la ndscaped areas sha ll be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
9 . G raffi ti. A ll graffi ti sha ll be rem oved w ithin 24 hours on telecom m unication tow ers,
eq uip m e nt, w a lls, or othe r structures.
10 . Wate r Q ua lity and D rainage . O the r tha n storm w ater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels,
pow de rs, se dim e nt, fert ilize rs, landscape debris, and w aste fro m entering the storm drain
syste m or from le aving the prope rty . To ensure com pliance w ith this C ondition of Appro val:
a. S p ills and le aks sha ll be cle aned up im m ediately.
b. D o not w ash, m a intain, or repair vehicles onsite.
c. D o not ho se dow n parking areas, sidew alks, alleys, or gutters.
d. Ensure tha t all m a te ria ls and pro ducts stored outside are protected fro m rain.
e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all tim e s.
Page 3 of 17
11. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent
specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall
be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of
that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular
cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Fiber Cement Siding
Color
Summer W heat
Trim, Fiashing, Gutters Sherman Vv'illiam (Green)
Brick Veneer
Stone Veneer
Metal Roof
Commercial Brick Corporation (Homestead)
Provia Dry Stack (Ottawa)
Metal Sales, 5V-Crimp, Galvalume
12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or
revisions to the approval of this project.
13. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling
bin, as well as regular solid waste containers.
14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized
on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan.
15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the
construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover in
accordance with T.M.C. 17.10.020.S
16. Roof Mounted Mechanical Equipment Screening. The applicant shall be required to screen
all roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right of ways.
If upon final inspection it is determined that any roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right of way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening that shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of
Community Development.
17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid
waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning
Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for
disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul
demolition and construction debris.
18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public
Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
19. Property Maintenance. All parkw ays, including within the right-of-way, entryw ay median,
landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by
the property owner or maintenance association.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit
20. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground
water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and
double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
Page 4 of 17
21. Placement of Double Detector C heck Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed
at locations that minim ize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and
approval by the Director of Com m unity Developm ent.
Page 5 of 17
22 . In a d ve rt e nt F ind s.. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are
discove red that w e re not asse ssed by the archaeological report (s) and/or environm ental
asse ssm e nt co nd ucted prio r to Pro je ct ap proval, the fo llow ing procedures shall be fo llow ed.
U n iq ue cultural reso urces are define d , fo r this condition only, as being m ultiple artifacts in
clo se associatio n w ith each othe r, but m ay include few er artifa cts if the area of the find is
de te rm ine d to be of sig nificance due to its sacred or cultural im port ance as determ ined in
co ns ultatio n w ith the N ative A m e rican Tribe (s). Tribal cultural resources are excluded from the
de fin itio n of uniq ue cultural resources as those resources are defined by the tribal values
ascrib e d to the m by the ir affi liated co m m unities. Treatm ent of tribal cultural resources
ina d ve rt e ntly dis cove red during the proje ct's gro und-disturbing activities shall be subject to the
co ns u ltatio n process required by state la w ;
i. A ii ground disturbance activitie s w ithin 100 feet of the discovered cultura l resources shall be
ha lted until a m e e ting is conve ned betw ee n the Project A pplicant, the Project A rchaeologist,
the T rib al R e p rese ntative (s), and the Pla nning D irector to discuss the significance of the find.
ii. A t the m e eting , the sig nificance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation
w ith the T riba l R e prese ntative (s) and the Pro ject A rchaeologist, a decisio n shall be m ade, w ith
the co nc urre nce of the Pla nn ing D irector, as to the appro priate m itigatio n (do cum entation,
re cove ry , av oid a nce , etc.) for the cultura l resources.
iii. F u rt he r gro und disturbance , includ ing but not lim ited to grading, trenching , etc., shall not
re su m e w ithin the area of the discove ry until an agreem e nt has been reache d by all parties as
to the ap p ro p riate m itigation. W ork sha ll be allow ed to continue outside of the buffer area and
w ill be m o nitored by add itiona l Triba l M o nitors if needed.
iv. T re atm e nt and avoid ance of the new ly discovered resources shall be consistent w ith the
C u ltura l R e sou rces M a nage m e nt Pla n and M o nitoring Agree m ents entered into w ith the
ap p ro p ria te tribes. This m ay include avoida nce of the cultural resources through project
de sig n , in-pla ce prese rv atio n of cultural resources located in native soils, and/or re-burial on
the Proje ct prope rt y so they are not subje ct to furt he r disturbance in pe rpetuity as identified in
N o n -D isclo sure of R e buria l C o nd itio n/M itigation M easures.
v. If the find is de term ined to be sig n ificant and avoidance of the site ha s not bee n achieved, a
Pha se Ill data re cove ry pla n sha ll be prepa red by the Pro ject A rcheologist, in consultation w ith
the T ribe , and sha ll be sub m itted to the C ity for the ir review and appro val befo re
im p le m e ntatio n of the said pla n .
vi. Pu rsua nt to C a lif. Pub . R e s. C ode § 210 83.2(b) avoidance is the preferred m ethod of
pre se rv atio n fo r archa eolo gical resou rces and cultural resources. If the Pro ject A pplicant and
the T ribe (s) can no t ag ree on the sig n ificance or the m itigation of the archaeolog ical or cultural
re so u rces, the se issue s w ill be prese nted to the Planning D irector fo r de cisio n. The Planning
D ire ctor sha ll m a ke the de te rm inatio n based on the pro visions of the C aliforn ia Environm ental
Q u a lity A ct w ith respe ct to archa e olo g ical resources, and recom m endations of the project
arche o lo g ist and sha ll conside r the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe.
N o tw ithstand ing any othe r rig hts availa b le unde r the law , the decisio n of the Planning D irector
sha ll be ap pea la b le to the C ity Pla n ning C om m ission and/or C ity C ouncil.
vii. E v id e nce of co m p lia nce w ith this m itigation m easure, if a sig nificant archaeological
reso u rce is fo und , sha ll be provid ed to the C ity of Tem ecula upon the com pletion of a
tre a tm e nt pla n and fina l report de tailing the significance and treatm ent find ing .
Page 6 of 17
2 3 . H u m a n R e m a in s . If h u m a n re m a in s a re e n c o u n te re d , C a lifo rn ia H e a lth a n d S a fe ty C o d e
S e c tio n 7 0 5 0 .5 s ta te s th a t n o fu rt h e r d is tu rb a n c e sh a ll o c c u r un til th e R iv e rsid e C o u n ty
C o ro n e r ha s m a d e th e n e c e s s a ry fin d in g s a s to th e o rig in . F u rt h e r, p u rs u a n t to C a lifo rn ia
P u b lic R e so u rce s C o d e S e ctio n 5 0 9 7 .9 8 (b ) re m a in s sh a ll be le ft in p la c e a n d fr e e fro m
d is tu rb a n c e u n til a fin a l d e c is io n a s to th e tre a tm e n t a n d d is p o s itio n ha s be e n m a d e . If th e
R iv e rsid e C o u n ty C o ro n e r d e te rm in e s th e re m a in s to be N a tiv e A m e ric a n , th e N a tiv e
A m e ric a n H e rita g e C o m m is s io n m u s t b e c o n ta c te d w ith in 2 4 ho u rs . T h e N a tiv e A m e ric a n
H e rita g e C o m m is s io n m u s t th e n im m e d ia te ly id e n tify th e "m o s t lik e ly de s c e n d a n t(s )" o f
re c e iv in g n o tifi c a tio n o f th e d is c o v e ry . T h e m o s t lik e ly d e s c e n d a n t(s ) sh a ll th e n m a k e
re c o m m e n d a tio n s w ith in 4 8 h o u rs , a n d e n g a g e in co n s u lta tio n s co n c e rn in g th e tre a tm e n t of
th e re m a in s a s p ro v id e d in P u b lic R e so u rce s C o d e 5 0 9 7 .9 8 a n d th e T re a tm e n t A g re e m e n t
d e s c rib e d in th e se co n d itio n s .
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
24. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of
Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The
City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these
fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the
provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of
contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF
25. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15,
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the
appropriate City fee. Developers may request an audit of impact fees and/or may request
notice for meetings related to the fee account or fund information.
26. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation
Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be
submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These
plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these
conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with
the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of
Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
27. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted
at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment
and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual
conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where
applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the
irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two
hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems
are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape
maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner
shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
Page 7 of 17
28. Agronom ic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the
plans stating, "The contractor shall provide tw o copies of an agronom ic soils report at the first
irrigation inspection."
29. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage
calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Developm ent Code (W ater Efficient O rdinance), the total
cost estim ate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with appro ved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 fo r calculating the maxim um allowable water
budget.
30. Landscape M aintenance Pro gram . A landscape maintenance pro gram shall be subm itted to
the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance pro gram shall detail the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper grovv'th and landscape
developm ent fo r the long-term esthetics of the property . The appro ved maintenance pro gram
shall be pro vided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry
out the detailed program .
31. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Pro gram . Specifications of the landscape
m aintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first
inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will
verify that irrigation equipm ent and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any
adjustm ents or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this tim e and will
require an approval to continue. W here applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be
conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150
psi for a m inim um period of tw o hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will
verify that all irrigation system s are operating pro perly, and to verify that all plantings have
been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third
inspection w ill verify property landscape maintenance fo r release of the one-year landscape
m aintenance bond." The applicanUow ner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule
inspections.
32. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include autom atic irrigation fo r all landscaped areas
and com plete screening of all ground mounted equipm ent fro m view of the public from streets
and adjacent property for private com m on areas; fro nt yards and slopes within individual lots;
shrub planting to com pletely screen perim eter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to
66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard
landscaping which shall include, but may not be lim ited to, private slopes and com m on areas.
33. Precise G rading Plans. Precise G rading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough
grading plans incl uding all structural setback measurem ents.
34. W Q M P Landscape C om pliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with
A ppendix A , Table 31 of the Low Im pact Developm ent (LI D) Manual fo r Southern Californ ia fo r
plant m aterials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the appro ved precise grading plan
for W Q M P features.
35. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction
draw ings shall show and label all utilities and provide appro priate screening. Pro vide a
three-fo ot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department befo re
starting the screen. G ro up utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of
utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities.
Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
Page 8 of 17
36 . S cree ning of Loading A reas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and
ro of m o unted m e cha nical equipm e nt from view of all residences and public right-of-w ays. If
up o n fina l inspectio n it is determ ined that any m echanical equipm ent, roof equipm ent or backs
of bu ild ing parapet w alls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-w ay adjacent to the
pro je ct site , the de ve lo per sha ll provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
m a nsa rd ro of ele m e nt or othe r scree ning review ed and approved by the Director of
C o m m u nity D eve lop m ent.
37 . Land scape In stallation C onsistent w ith C onstruction Plans. A ll required landscape planting
and irrig atio n sha ll have bee n installed consistent w ith the approved construction plans and
sha ll be in a cond itio n acce ptable to the D irector of C om m unity Developm ent. The plants
sha ll be he althy and free of w eeds, disease , or pests. The irrigation system shall be pro perly
constructed and in good w orking orde r.
38 . Pe rf orm a nce Se curities. Pe rf orm ance securities, in am ounts to be determ ined by the
D irector of C om m unity D evelopm e nt, to guarantee the m aintenance of the plantings in
acco rda nce w ith the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with
the Pla nn ing D ivisio n fo r a pe riod of one year from final C ert ificate of Occupancy. After that
ye ar, if the la ndscap ing and irrigatio n system have been m aintained in a condition satisfactory
to the D irector of C om m unity D evelo pm e nt, the bond shall be released upon request by the
ap plicant.
39 . Installatio n of S ite Im p rovem ents. A ll site im provem ents, including but not lim ited to, parking
area s and strip ing sha ll be installed.
4 0 . C o m p lia nce w ith C o nditions of A pproval. A ll of the fo regoing conditions shall be com plied
w ith prio r to occupancy or any use allow ed by this approval.
Outside Agencies
4 1. F lo o d Protectio n. Flo od protectio n shall be pro vided in accordance w ith the R iverside County
F lo od C o ntrol D istricts transm ittal dated Septem ber 14 , 2023, a copy of w hich is attached.
The fee is m a de payable to the R iverside C ounty Flood C ontro l W ater District by either a
cashie r's che ck or m o ney orde r, prior to the issuance of a grading perm it (unless deferred to a
late r da te by the D istrict), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
4 2 . C o m p lia nce w ith D e pt. of E nvironm ental Health. The applicant shall com ply w ith the
recom m e ndatio ns se t fo rt h in the C ounty of R iverside Depart m ent of Environm ental Health
transm ittal dated A ug ust 7, 2024, a copy of w hich is attached.
4 3 . C o m p lia nce w ith G e otechnical. The applicant shall com ply w ith the recom m endations set
fo rth in the Le ig hton C o nsulting , Inc. transm ittal dated M ay 17, 2024, a copy of which is
attache d .
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
44.
45.
C o nd itio ns of A p pro val. The deve loper shall com ply w ith all C onditions of A pproval, the
E ng inee ring and C o nstructio n M anual and all C ity codes/standards at no cost to any
gove rn m e ntal age ncy.
Entitle m e nt A pp ro val. The developer shall com ply w ith the appro ved site plan, the
co nce ptua l Wate r Q ua lity M a nagem e nt Pla n (W Q M P ) and other relevant docum ents appro ved
du ring entitle m e nt. A ny sig nificant om ission to the representation of site conditions m ay
req u ire the pla ns to be resubm itted for further review and revision.
Page 9 of 17
46 .
4 7 .
4 8 .
4 9 .
Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public
right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works.
Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public
roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is
required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's
Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works.
Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction,
encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite
improvements.
Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately
maintained.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
50. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per
the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
51. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion &
sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to
the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls
to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction
Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM
52. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and
entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements.
53. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the
State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Construction Activities and shall provide the following:
a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB);
b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and
c. Tho name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP
Developer (QSD)
Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's
storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated
and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely
updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review
www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml
Page 10 of 17
54. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP} and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit
a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan
submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive
acce pta n ce by P ub lic W orks. A co p y of the fina l proje ct-spe cific WQMP must be kept onsite
at all tim e s. In ad d itio n, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement
sha ll be sub m itt ed fo r revie w an d ap p ro va l. U p o n ap p rova l fr o m City staff, the applicant shall
re co rd the O &M ag re e m e nt at the C o u nty R e corde r's O ffi c e in Tem e cula. Refer to the WQMP
te m p la te an d ag ree m e nt lin k: www .Te m e cula C A.g o v/W Q M P . A s pa rt of the W Q M P ap p ro va l,
the E n g in e e r of R e co rd sha ll re p o rt and ce rt ify B M P co nstructio n pe r C ity of Tem e cula N P D E S
re q u ire m e nts. S h o uld the pro je ct req u ire A lte rn a tive C o m p lia nce , the de ve lo pe r is
re sp o n sib le fo r exe cutio n of an ap p ro ve d A lte rn a tive C o m p lia nce A g ree m e nt.
55 . A re a D rain a g e P la n (A D P } Fe e to R C F C &W C D . T he de ve lo p e r sha ll de m o n strate to the C ity
tha t the flo o d m itig atio n cha rge (A D P fee ) ha s be e n pa id to R C F C &W C D . If the full A D P fee
ha s alre a d y be e n cre d ited to th is pro p e rt y, no ne w cha rge w ill be re q u ired .
56 . D ra ina g e . A ll ap plica b le d ra in a g e sha ll be de p icte d on the grad in g pla n and pro p e rly
acco m m o d a ted w ith onsite d ra in a g e im p rove m e nts an d w a te r qu a lity facilitie s, w h ich sha ll be
priv ate ly m a intaine d . A lte ratio n s to existin g draina g e patt e rn s or co nce ntratio n an d/or
div e rt in g flo w s is no t allo w e d un le ss the de ve lo p e r co n structs ad e q u a te dra in a g e
im p ro ve m e nts and obtain s the ne ce ssa ry pe rm issio ns fro m the do w nstre a m pro p e rt y ow ne rs.
A ll d ra ina g e le a ving the site sh a ll be co nve yed into a pu b lic sto rm drain syste m , if po ssib le .
T he cre atio n of ne w cro ss lo t dra in a g e is no t pe rm itt e d .
57 . D ra in a g e S tud y . A drain a g e stud y sha ll be pre pa re d by a re g iste red civ il e ng in e e r and
su b m itt e d to P u b lic W orks w ith the in itia l grad in g pla n che ck in acco rda nce w ith C ity , R ive rsid e
C o u nty an d e ng ine e ring stan d a rds . T he study sha ll id e ntify sto rm w ate r ru no ff qu a ntitie s (to
m itig a te the 10 and 10 0-ye a r sto rm eve nt for 24 ho u r sto rm du ratio n pe a k flo w ) fro m the
de ve lo p m e nt of this site an d up stre a m of the site . It sha ll id e ntify all ex istin g or prop o se d
off site or on s ite , pu b lic or priv ate , drain a ge facilitie s inte nd e d to discha rge this ru no ff . R u no ff
sha ll be co nve ye d to an ad e q u a te outf all ca p a b le of re ce iv in g the sto rm w ate r ru no ff w itho ut
da m a g e to pub lic or private pro p e rty . T he stud y sha ll in clu d e a ca p a city an a lysis ve rify ing the
ad e q u a cy of all facilitie s. A ny up g rad ing or up siz in g of d ra in a g e facilitie s ne ce ssa ry to
co nv e y the storm w ate r run o ff sha ll be prov id e d as pa rt of de ve lo p m e nt of th is proje ct.
58 . S o ils R e p o rt . A so ils re po rt , pre p a re d by a reg iste red so il or civ il e ng ine e r, sha ll be sub m itt ed
to P u b lic W orks w ith the in itia l grad in g pla n su b m itt al. T he re p o rt sha ll ad d re ss the site 's so il
co n d itio ns and pro vid e re co m m e nd a tio ns fo r the co n structi o n of e ng in e e red structure s and
pre lim in a ry pave m e nt se ctio n s .
59 . Le tt e r of P e rm issio n/E a se m e nt. T he de ve lo p e r sha ll obtain do cum e nts (le tte rs of pe rm issio n
or ea se m e nts) fo r an y offsite w o rk pe rf orm e d on adjo in in g prop e rt ie s. T he do cum e nt's form a t
is as dire cte d by, and sha ll be su b m itt ed to , P u b lic Works fo r acce ptan ce . T he do cum e nt
info rm a tio n sha ll be no te d on the ap p ro ve d grad in g pla n .
60 . H a b itat C o n se rv atio n Fe e . T he de ve lo p e r sha ll co m p ly w ith the provisio n s of C ha p te r 8.2 4 of
the Te m e cu la M u nicip a l C o d e (H a b itat C o nse rv atio n) by pa y in g the ap p rop ria te fee se t fo rt h in
the ord in a n c e or by provid in g do cum e nte d evid e nce tha t the fee s ha ve alre a dy be e n pa id .
6 1. A m e rica n D isa b ility A ct. T he de ve lo p e r sha ll e ns ure tha t all fro ntag e are a s to the prop o se d
de ve lo p m e nt w ithin the pu b lic rig ht of w ay are A D A co m p lia n t. A ny sid e w a lk w ithin the pub lic
rig ht of w ay fo u n d to be no n-co m p lia nt sha ll be the re sp o n s ib ility of the pro p e rt y ow ne r to be
re m o v e d an d re p la ced w ith A D A co m p lia nt sid ew a lk pe r the S tree ts an d H ig hw ay C o d e
S e ctio n 56 10 .
Page 11 of 17
Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s)
62 . P u b lic U tility A ge ncy W ork. The de ve lo pe r shall subm it all relevant docum entation due to
e nc ro a ching w ithin C ity rig ht-of-w ay; and is responsible fo r any associated costs and fo r
m a kin g arrange m e nts w ith each ap plicab le public utility age ncy.
63 . T raffi c C o ntro l Pla ns. A constructio n area traffi c contro l plan (T C P ) w ill be required for lane
clo sure s and de tours or othe r disruptio ns to traffi c ci rculation; and shall be review ed and
ap p ro ved by Pub lic W orks. The TC P sha ll be designed by a registered civil or traffi c engineer
in co nfo rm a nce w ith the latest ed itio n of the C altrans M a nual on U niform Traffi c C ontro l
D e vice s (M U T C D ) and C ity stand a rds.
64 . Im p rove m e nt P!a ns. .t\!! im p rove m e nt pla ns (including but not lim ited to street, storm drain,
traffi c) sha ll be review ed and ap proved by Public W orks.
65 . Stree t T renc hing . A ll street tre nche s shall conform to C ity Standard No. 407; refer to the
C ity's Pav ing N otes.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
C e rt ificatio ns. C e rtificatio ns are req uired from the registered civil engineer-of-record
ce rt ify ing the build ing pad ele vatio n(s) per the appro ved pla ns and from the soil's
e ng in e e r-of-record ce rtify ing co m paction of the building pad(s).
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
66 .
67 . C o m p letio n of Im p ro ve m e nts. The de ve lo per shall com plete all w ork pe r the appro ved plans
and C o nd itio ns of A pp roval to the satisfactio n of the C ity Enginee r. This includes all on site
w o rk (inc lud ing w ater qua lity facilities), public im pro ve m e nts and the executed W Q M P
O p e ratio n and M a intena nce ag ree m e nt.
68 . U tility A ge ncy C le arances. The de ve lo pe r shall receive w ritten cl earance from applicable
utility age ncie s (i.e., R ancho C a lifo rn ia and Eastern M unicipal Water D istricts, etc.) fo r the
co m p le tio n of the ir respective facilitie s and provide to Public W orks.
69 . R e p la ce m e nt of D a m age d Im p rove m e nts/M onum e nts. A ny ap purtena nce dam aged or
bro ke n du ring de velo p m e nt sha ll be re paired or rem oved and repla ced to the satisfaction of
Pu b lic W orks. A ny surv e y m o num e nts dam aged or destroyed shall be. rP.8P.t per C ity
Stan d a rds by a qua lifie d pro fessio na l pursuant to the C alifo rn ia Business and Pro fessional
C o d e S ectio n 877 1.
70 . C e rt ificatio ns . A ll ne cessary ce rtificatio ns and clearances from enginee rs, utility com panies
an d pub lic age ncie s sha ll be sub m itted as required by Public Works.
71. W ate r Q ua lity M a na ge m e nt P la n (W Q M P ) Verification. A s part of the W Q M P approval, the
En g in e e r of R ecord sha ll repo rt and ce rtify BM P construction pe r C ity of Tem ecula N P D E S
re q u ire m e nts. S ho uld the proje ct req uire altern ative com pliance, the developer is responsible
fo r exe cutio n of an ap pro ved A lte rn ative C o m pliance A greem e nt.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Requirements
72 . F ina l Build ing and Safety C ond itio ns. Fina l Building and S afety conditions w ill be addressed
w he n build ing co nstructio n pla ns are sub m itted to Building and S afety for review . T hese
co n d itio ns w ill be base d on occup ancy, use , the C aliforn ia Build ing C ode (C B C ), and related
co d e s w hic h are enforced at the tim e of building plan subm ittal.
Page 12 of 17
73.
74.
Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the
most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California
Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24
Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and
building setbacks on plans to include:
a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building.
c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement.
d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash
enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas.
75. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan
review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside
Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights
and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and
Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin
or below.
Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by
requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family
residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects.
Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified
School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the
payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit
approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards,
and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required
over new and existing trash enclosures.
Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits.
Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate
approvals and permits.
82. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project,
indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section
9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours
of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is
permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
83. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation
of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site.
Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of
exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed.
FIRE PREVENTION
Page 13 of 17
General Requirements
84. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances
per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 ½" outlets) shall be located on fire
access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial projects hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the
street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall
be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a
looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and
Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
85. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building
plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on
occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related
codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
86. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for
this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure for a 2-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided. (CFC Appendix Band Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
87. Fire Requirement (CO2 beverage System). CO2 Beverage System plans shall be submitted
electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Plans must be submitted by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to
the issuance of building permit.
88. Fire Requirement (Hood Extinguishing System). Hood Fire Suppression plans shall be
submitted electronically to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Hood Fire Suppression
plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These
plans must be submitted by a contractor who is licensed and certified to work on said system.
Certificates will be required at time of submittal. These plans must be submitted prior to the
issuance of building permit.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
89. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed
width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
90. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather
surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5).
91. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained
to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide
all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of
AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all
locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC
Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
Page 14 of 17
9 2 . R e q u ir e d S u b m itt a ls (F ir e U n d e r g ro u n d W a t e r ). T h e d e v e lo p e r s h a ll s u b m it e le c t ro n ic c o p ie s
o f t h e w a t e r s y s t e m p la n s t o th e F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u fo r a p p r o v a l p r io r t o in s t a ll a t io n fo r a ll
p r iv a t e w a t e r s y s t e m s p e rt a in in g t o t h e fi r e s e rv ic e lo o p . P la n s s h a ll b e e le c t ro n ic a ll y s ig n e d
b y a r e g is t e r e d c iv il e n g in e e r , c o n t a in a F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u a p p ro v a l s ig n a t u r e b lo c k , a n d
c o n f o r m t o h y d r a n t ty p e , lo c a t io n , s p a c in g a n d m in im u m fi r e fl o w s t a n d a r d s . H y d r a u li c
c a lc u la t io n s w ill b e r e q u ir e d w it h th e u n d e r g ro u n d s u b m itt a l t o e n s u r e fi r e fl o w r e q u ir e m e n t s
a r e b e in g m e t f o r t h e o n -s it e h y d r a n t s . T h e p la n s m u s t b e s u b m itt e d a n d a p p r o v e d p r io r to
b u ild in g p e r m it b e in g is s u e d (C F C C h a p t e r 3 3 a n d C h a p t e r 5 ).
9 3 . R e q u ir e d S u b m itt a ls (F ir e S p r in k le r S y s te m s ). F ir e s p r in k le r p la n s s h a ll b e s u b m itt e d
e le c t ro n ic a ll y t o t h e F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u fo r a p p ro v a l. F ir e s p r in k le r p la n s m u s t b e
s u b m itt e d b y t h e in s t a llin g c o n t r a c t o r t o t h e F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u . T h e s e p la n s m u s t b e
s u b m itt e d p r io r t o t h e is s u a n c e o f b u ild in g p e r m it.
9 4 . R e q u ir e d S u b m itt a ls (F ir e A la r m S y s t e m s ). F ir e a la r m p la n s s h a ll b e s u b m itt e d e le c t r o n ic a lly
t o t h e F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u fo r a p p ro v a l. F ir e a la r m p la n s m u s t b e s u b m itt e d b y t h e
in s t a ll in g c o n t r a c t o r t o t h e F ir e P r e v e n t io n B u r e a u . T h e fi r e a la r m s y s t e m is re q u ir e d to h a v e
a d e d ic a t e d c ir c u it f r o m t h e h o u s e p a n e l. T h e s e p la n s m u s t b e s u b m itt e d p r io r t o th e
is s u a n c e o f b u ild in g p e r m it.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
95. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective
markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
96. Knox Box. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of
six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter
5).
97. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or
approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the
street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background.
Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a
minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code
Section 15.16.020).
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
98. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are
kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking
into the buildings utilizing lower level windows.
99. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at
a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural
ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings.
100. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed
above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination
at ground level, evenly dispersed.
101. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted
light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness.
Page 15 of 17
102. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms,
hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
103. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or
painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula
Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP.
104. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm
system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to
notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant
offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system.
This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7.
105. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with
Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
Page 16 of 17
106 . C rim e Preve ntio n Thro ugh Environm e ntal D esign. C rim e prevention thro ugh enviro nm ental
desig n as de ve lo pe d by the Natio nal C rim e Prevention Institute (N C P I) supports the concept
that "the pro pe r de sig n and effective use of the built environm ent can lead to a reduction in the
fear and incid e nce of crim e and an im provem ent in the quality of life." T he nine prim ary
strategie s tha t sup po rt this concept are include d as conditions below :
a. Provide cle ar bo rder definition of contro lled space. Exam ples of border definition m ay
include fences, shrub be ry or signs in ext erior areas. W ithin a building, the arrangem ent of
furn iture and co lo r definition can serv e as a m e ans of identify ing contro lled space.
b. Provide cle a rly m a rked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they
are m oving fro m pub lic to sem i-public to private space.
c. G athe ring or cong regating areas to be located or designated in locations w here there is
go od surv e illa nce and access contro l.
d. Place safe activitie s in unsafe locatio ns. Safe activities attract norm al users to a location
and subse que ntly re nde r the location less attractive to abnorm al users due to observ ation and
possib le interv e ntio n .
e. Pla ce unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural
surv e illa nce or co ntrolled access w ill help overcom e risk and m ake the users of the areas feel
safer.
f. R ede sig n the use of space to pro vide natural barriers. Separate activities that m ay conflict
w ith each other (o utdoor basketball court and children's play area, fo r exam ple) by distance,
natural terrain or othe r functions to avoid such conflict.
g. Im p rove sche d u ling of space . The tim ing in the use of space can reduce the risk fo r
no rm a l use rs and cause abnorm al use rs to be of greater risk of surv eillance and interv ention.
h. R ede sig n spa ce to increase the pe rception of natural surv eillance. A bnorm al users need
to be aw a re of the risk of detection and possible interv ention. W indow s and clear
line s-of-sig ht se rv e to provide such a perception of surv eillance.
i. O ve rcom e distance and isolation. This strategy m ay be accom plished thro ugh im proved
com m unicatio ns (po rtable tw o-w ay radios, fo r exam ple) and design effi ciencies, such as the
lo catio n of restro o m s in a public building.
10 7 . Bus ine ss Se curity Su rv ey. Businesses desiring a business security surv ey of their location
can contact the C rim e P revention and Plans U nit of the Tem ecula Police Depart m ent at (951)
695-277 3 .
10 8 . Q ue stio ns R e g a rding C onditions. A ny questions regarding these conditions should be
directed to the Tem e cula Police D epartm e nt C rim e Prevention and Plans Unit at (951)
69 5-27 7 3 .
Page 17 of 17
..
.
"'
=
C,
"'
:z
:
CO
:
Cl
..
co
:
..
.
C,
..
.
a:
I
,
I
j
-,-
I.
..
.,
.
·-
..
--
..
3
Ii
' ,
~
~
j;i
•
•
g•
~
i
.
..
~
I
iHi
I
~
I
Si!
S!~
• <
~
§~~
§~~
a
il:i
i
it!"
i
i
~
~
Ill□
,.
.
.
■
c-
,
u
I
i
&
&
-&
~
&
t.
1
f
T
f
r:
j
ii'
~·
;;
4'
,:
l'
f
!1
"
1 I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
~
~
'
"
&
~
-&
~
f
~;
~!
~:
~·
71
~
j'
i"
1;
,,
f1
,·
!
'
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
!II
il
l
l
rn
;:
:
:
-
i
;:
:
:
-
en
L
en
~
UJ
n
;;
:
I
I
t
>-
-
>-
-
a:
I!
::
:
,
0
0
6
~
:z
:z
0
0
.=
;
~
ff
i
>-
-
I
"'
er
~HIUII
l;,Wlil,ti/N~IIINl,f(lti
11...tlllltid.Ni:.io.N.tut
\M!lt li4~1h,l\.lll tlOIMI J
EXTUIOAFINISHSCl£Dut.E
l.ltlUIIA (.l~ SID!Nll, IW>l'IC tEDA~ I,~·
lltl~:=t=.~f::.1
:!~00\'l
COIOll;,LJUIAl"'lilftf.ll
l
'lill!Ot[~lHIILLWDII~
,:'1M~~=~~C0lll"
------
L
~~.~~
"''"; .0
:.,0
,0
,,•-,-:~
·•··,:~
~'l-0
.::·~
"'"'"::~
!&.lW"'-1.~0
REAR ELEVATION (SOUTHEAST)
abOOW.8ryn l.1awr A~r~.Su1ltllOON
Ch11:ago,ID111U1,blltiJI
1:1m:raa.Q10011141.71111.95Jt, 4P TEXAS ROAD~~~S5~ I ~~~~!f~1~~-EVATIONS
TEM:;~3~~~~ A2. 1
Oll/l\111W~
$
&
&
,&
,&
~I
fy
&
~
i·
l'
!!
•:
~:
I
;;
i!
~
f
~'"
~
I I I I
;=
-
U)
~ I
I-
::
,
0 ~
z 0
~ w
I-
I
"'
a:
di
Il
l
t
I;
-
!;,
1
11
!
!
I
!
I~
.,I
I
I
..
.
liij
H
,,11!1
"'
,~
='
8
111
'!
~-·
!
::
:
,
Hi
h
r,
Cl
1;!1
.u
•
i]
"'
:c
H
o-
ljlrl~ll
H
a~
CC
Cl
·'·tt
..
ci
:
ll
i
ii!,
~!•l
!U
~lEi
_;i
i
~!
~t:
"'
Cl
55
~
:.
3
5
~
,1.i
.
'
..
.
a:
/
\
(L
".
:
1:
·
i
<(
::
,
~
X
.\
I
.,
,
•
c:
,
~
~
:
I
I
/
I
,_
I
!.
";
.
..
.
..
I
•"'
"'"
.
·"
i
II
e
.L
~~NADE
MALLE-
z
:5
..
.
C,
..
z
.,
:
;
I
Q
i:
!
C,
)
..
..
.,
..
,
0
ii
i
N
cc
..
I I I I
l
I I
I
jii
I
i"
')
n
• :;i;
:J
.
~ • ~~ r
§i
:i u
~i
~~
:,
),
Ii
w
!~~
>-
0
S
's
~
z
gr•
0
,
e
0
•••
0
~a!
_J
Lg
"-
..
.
"'
=
Cl
en
:c
er
a
><
er
"'
Cl
..
.
a:
= .
co
u
0
z w
(.
'
.
)
w
-'
',,
;
·»
I '
, ' •'• - - . '✓ ' • • • • • • • . • ••••• - ..... •. -------····· ',~~.:~L c=· \ - "'
I
..,, ...... l,MIO ... ,., .. , .... ,_
.. . . - . "\
~,·.w~o1- .
•
. . ..
.
. .
Plo--t Lo:::ion:,
~ IIO T _.,U IC A L r1A M E
~
~ 641 AUIC.AL NAM[
SI-I~ -. ,. ·u••-· . -···-··"·- . ..,,. _ ,., . . ·~·---'···-· • C. C:.:::: ,~ .... -~~•~• ~- . "~·-··-~-.-~ .... "_
~
1 ··--·-·~·-···
1.,UWr11Utl!4AME
t.UM~HINA"'1E
~ I.:!.£!; _I&[ ~ ~
~ !..!:.fl; ~ t.,\ljA.IIVE
l.A,..AIIVI: Y..!.!
~
M v ch -000"0
~'!:Kl~
~ t,..,1,,.,0, l!O• l•IO: "'~"'""•"""•••-"-''"""f"""
....,,..,, ,-~-•"ll •"'•"'•"l-&11 -0....._,Ll.H ,:..o ...... ,"'_, , ..... , ..... ,
... ~--···-·" - '''""""''*" "'
...,., .. ,,..,, ... , .,,.,...,~·-r1o,_ .. ,,,..., ... , ... ••~"""''°"""'"'·•,. .. _,..,._......,.,,.,..,_,_.-••• .. • .. .,.N,,.,, ... ,m ,k "lo ............................. --.:.. ... ,.- - ...• .,,,,
0 10 2C --------
·,, ......
i 1-'.~\
~J ~
NORTH
,I
~
i .,
:,
"' s: w
5 w
0: s a. ... z w
"' a.
0
..J w > w
0
l ~
i
...
~
~
CONC EPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLA N
TEXAS ROADHOUSE
TEMECULA, CA
WOOD ARCHITECTURE ~
- ' 'T
~-C,LP-1 ;
w!q •. ,.,~ ~"·"' hllo) '"' • 'o1n CJ) z a.
<{
~ _:..-:.1
-.j ' ' _z_-~- RENDER VIEWS:
,,,.
ld
I, ·,
, .... 1-1i1,.
':V·.
-~
.j.
-~-
1- :i~:,:
-1'"'· ·--I\~-.
"Ir ~ ..Nltl..,r,, ••
.,>:!.
. ,_ .
l:
l,,.
·--h·" ~1 ... ·:· .
1
-~
cj?·
I. -
.J ..
\ .,_~ ·-
-;-- '·'i'·'·
.,.
-~-
l
~. ';;.~ ':..: ~ ...
.. -6r- :· . - ~ . ., '
·1: l
·Jo,· r
:-!-·--:~"·•
~~ J:·' '.'..
--J-. -~.
~ ~!'- .. · ·-- ..
~:
··+··· ... , ' - '
. '.·--: r_: : :
.. , .. · •. '• .
. ·. • ... , .
. , :.J~l:~
l
- ... i· 1~~: . . . ·- ..
.__ •, .. , ._
. . t. 7·-'
,-'"I
>" .:,_,.Zi·
. '-
Ii'! J'I•
If·t~\121'ilb1bt, '"''•"J:tm ·~ !l . l •j ,.1 ,-,---,
Scale: 1 inch= 30 Ft.
(:::__,_) ,·
'-I-·-·
,-1 ·--· ~-=r~--
:- - :· - ~-~r't t ' ' .,, . }/
-•·1,--: /,~' .. l ·fj
••,~ !- :>/ C'
Design Notes:
Reflectance: Walls - 0.5
Target Requirements:
PARKING AREA: lFC MIN or better - Achieved
ENTRANCE : ZFC MIN or better - Achieved
ceoera! Notes:
The preparer of this study docs not assume respcnst buu v tor the suitability ol this design in acco rdance with ltSNA
reccmmcndanc ns.
Prior to placing an order, it is the customer's resconsrbuu v to carefu lly review and approve this study.
Please note that this analysis ,s based on a mathcmaucal model and its accuracy is co nstrained by the hmit auo ns of
the third-party scuwore and the IES standards employed.
LIGHTING PARAMETERS·
Lumlnaire Schedule
Symbol Label Qty Arrangement LLF Description Arr.W atts Arr. Lum. Lumens Mounting Height Manufacturer -- • 6 SINGLE 0.900 SLPM24LFT 4K 160 233 78 25 ATLA S LIGHTING
-----1·• B 3 SINGLE 0.900 SLPM24LT3 4K 160 23978 25 ATLA S LIGHTING
- -£,;I
C 9 BACK-BACK 0.900 SLPM24LTS4K 320 48048 25 ATLA S LIGHTING • F!7 2 SinR;le 0.900 10PU02E26LED27 ID 9S0 8 Signify
Calcu1atlon Summa.!r
Label Units All,! Ma, Min Av1l Mln Max[Mln I Grid Z PtS_pclr I PtSpcTb
Entrance Fe 6.40 7.0 5.8 1.10 1.21 Io s Is
PARKING Fe 3.54 8.8 1.0 3.S4 8.80 ID I 10
While the d1g1tal CAO data may appear to be precise, it is important to reccgnlz c that this apparent accura cy 1s a result ol
the techniques used to generate it and should not be int erprt tcd as real-world accuracy.
Numerous factors will affect the actual performance ot hghti11g in the constructed space. These factors include the accuracy
of the original source files provided by the manufacturer (.ics files), variations in Input voltage and ballast performance, the
actual finishing values within the constructed en vtr cnmeu t, manufacturing discrepancies in both the light source (lampl i'.lnd
the lummaire, the rinal ptc cemem of the luminairc:., the presence of obstructions, and the quality of installation.
Furthermore, 1t is essential to acknowledge that lield measurements themselves arc susceptible to errors stemming from
selected measurement methods or technology, as well as the expertise and capabilities ot the measuring party. W hile tbe
creator of this lighting study strives for accuracy, they cannot be held accountable lor any errors thal may occur.
The recipient of this lighting study acknowledges and accepts that the likelihood of scaling erro rs increases in the absence
of a .DW G file or other properly dimensioned drawing provtoe d to the designer.
Given that reflective values have a significant impact on li(!ht levels, it is imperative for the end-user of this docu ment to
verily and conlirm these values before accepting the results ot any photometric report.
~
i 0a
I
'§
b.O
C ... ..c
b.O
~
a, .. ~
V)
<t u
n,'
::I u a,
E a,
I-
I
a,
Ill
::I
0 ..c
"C
"' 0 c::
Ill
"' >< a,
I-
llrJwnBy BC
ll.lte:10/3/7.024
l-',1gelot3
0
,<
I
,
.
-
I
I
I
·'
·,
I
____ :.
.
,
_
=
C)
:c
Q
c:
:
:
c
C)
Cl
)
=
c:
:
:
c
><
w
..
.
.
.,
:
.
.
_
•. ,.:
•
-0
'
~~
.,
.>
_
}.-
::
'
-
-,
~-
'
_,.
,
-
-·-
.-
-.c
_
_
.
;
~
~
f _:
~
~
£
.
::
1
-
-
-
-
=, ...
.
.
.
.
__
,
.
.
.
..
.
.
;
;
;
;:
:
:
:
;_
.
.
..
.
,
,
.
;;
;
;
;
;
;:
::
~~~~.:;-i'
;;
;
=~~;,
;
.
.
.
-'
.:
y
,
.!
.
.:
r:
;
,
·
.1 J
.:
\
~--~---
~
'T
,-
.,
.
i:
i
..
.
..
:
.
.:\
---
,-
~-~-
\
-
4n
,
"N
,f
, ..
.
'X
.•
u•-:
:
e
..
.
""C
'
I
"'
·"
'
~
J
,
...
;•
-
in
•N
r
_.
,
:
u-~
.-
,
:;
~
--
.. --
,;
• ..
,
..
.
..
,
.
-.
_,;
,
;
·
(1~- ..
.
~-
..
;;
,
":
..
.
;.
1~
.
.
•I
.
"'
J
I
~,-
:
.
.-
~
.
,i
.,
u
la
.,
-
97
-
-~
\
..
.
.
;
u.
.
\D
.-
i
II
..
c
u
C
.-
i
QJ
"'
u
Vl
u
0
,'
_;
·1
.•
...
.
.
c--.·
•'
1·_
,,
j-
'
.
1·
•
t
:
1-·
'I
,-,
f
·"
:~~-
.,
!
_;
,;
,
,,
L_'
...
"'
-"
~ ±
_'.
,u
~
""
.f
~·
:c
_;u
~;
..
c,
-~
,;
~----
,,;.---~
"
•
I
,-
C
.1
·-
.
.:
..
.
.
.
"'
·
.r
~
~
µ
~-
.
,
~.'
.
;
-__
L
,;
-~
I,·'~
..
,
;
u.
.
\D
..
.
.
.
II
..
c
u
C:
..
.
.
.
.!
!
!
"'
u
V,
Location
Fl S
~tf!~ ~ llfil.'11!111 .. IJID ... ,. w ..
~ , ..
Description
30W WALL WASHER
F15 only SOW WALL WASHER
SKU#
»m- .. -•--
((((
I- ' -hY ,,
•--•- - •I-.,
))») ......... _,.,A ... H~
-••➔·~,T•+•t--••·•=;- ••
111
:;:-
-- J•J•I/IOIIS
))»,) ..... _ ... _,_
Location
F16
Description
LED GOOSENECK
SKU#
MJYP1805
{ES716)
5 VEAR WARRANTY
=
-:+--- cc, {a t -..i;--««<
>n·»- w,01.t.
===--==- •1,. ---- --~
' -- .... =· ... -w
!"~~
,-~
'-1~
..:.~~ ..
===--==-
==--=E.. ::-====
~ 1071 Gd=:J~
FIGURE TYPE ·owe-v· - TYPICAL
·····~--R~ ~ <:.-1
flGVRE TYPE "OWB - FIXTU RE 9 TYPICAL
MATCIIW.: 1E._° CONDUIT T'l'P.
OUIDOOR BRACKET FOR
lYPE "F9" FIXTURE
Location
F17
.......... , .........
::~:..i'11"'·· --•11· ........ ,, ....
BIKE RACK DET AIL
Description
LED GOOSENECK
ABOVE FRONT ENTRANCE
SKU#
RVLT
SKU# MJVP1806
LED 2700k BULB: 10PU02E26LED 27
5 VEAR WARRANTY
SECTION AT
SCREEN WALL
••
,-
.:.*
.. TEXAS ROAD~~~o~~ I ~~L;~~~ICATIONS
TEMECULA.CA SPC1
otorllnUH
8600W.llrynL4.IWl"Avemit.Srnlt800N
Cl11C¥,lllll'l(H¥606Jl
t:8◄7.78H.920011147.78R.Q~36
EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE
ALLURA LAP SIDING, RUSTIC CEDAR 8.25"
FIBER CEMENT (7" EXPOSURE) COLOR: SUMMER WHEAT
SIDING ALLURA VERTIAL PANEL, RUSTIC 8" DC GROOVE,
COLOR: SUMMER WHEAT
TRIM, METAL PAINT #1: 21 FLASHING & SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, GREEN GUTTER!i --
31 DOWNSPOUTS & PAINT #2:
SPLIT-FACE CMU TO MATCH BRICK VENEER
DOWNSPOUTS @ PAINT #2.l
41 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, #6117 "SMOKEY TOPAZ" CEDAR POSTS FINISH COLOR TO MATCH FIBER CEMENT COLOR
METAL DOOHS &
S I FRAMES, DUMPSTER PAINT #3:
GATES, BOLLARDS & SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINTS, GLOSS BLACK
METAL RAILS.
COMMERCIAL BRICK CORPORATION
61 BRICK VENEER "HOMESTEAD"
PROVIA: DRY STACK "OTTAWA"
71
THIN STONE VENEER (OVER 4" OR 8" CMU)
STONE VENEER I 3819 OLD WHEELING RD.
ZANESVILLE, OH 43701
7 40-450-4236
Bl METAL SALES METALRODF I 5V-CRIMP, GALVALUME
8 I r-CJ
00NT ELEVATION (SO OIIQNISO
8600 W. Bryn Maw1 Avenur. Suite BOON
Chlca90,lll,no1s6D631
1·847.788,92001·847.788.9536 ~
TEXAS ROADHOUSE I MATERIAL BOARD
TEMECULA. Cl,
8,000SF MBl 0 PA23·0341 •
06/21/2024
C ity o f Tem e c ula
Communi1y Develop ment
410 00 M a in Stre et • Tem e cula, CA 925 90
Phone (9 5 1) 694 -6 4 00 • Fax (95 1) 694-6 477 • Tem ecula CA.gov
V IA -E L E C T R O N IC SU B M IT T A L
C E O AP ro cessing@ asrclkr ec.com
Febru ary 28, 2025
S upervising Legal C ert ifi cation C lerk
C oun ty of Ri verside
Post O ffi ce B ox 751
Ri verside, C A 9250 1-0751
SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA23-0341, a
Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse
restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road
D ear S ir/M adam :
E ncl osed is the N otice of D eterm in ation fo r the above refe renced project. In addition, pursuan t to
A ssem bly B ill 3158 (C hapter 17 06) the A pplican t w ill pay fo r the C ounty A dm inistra tive fe e to
enable the C ity to file the N otice of D eterm ination required under Public R esources Code Section
21152 and 14 C alifo rn ia C ode R egulations 1507. The paym ent of the $50.00 filing fe e is under
pro test. It is the opin ion of the C ity that the adm inistra tive fe e has been increased in a m ann er
in con sistent w ith the pro vision s of State Law . U nder Public R esources C ode Section 211 52 and
14 C alifo rn ia C ode R egulation s 1507, the C ounty is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fe e.
A lso, please em ail a stam ped copy of the N otice of D eterm ination within five working days aft er
the 30 -day posting to the em ail listed below .
If you have any questions regarding this m atter, please contact Scott C ooper at (951) 506-513 7 or
at em ail scott.cooper@ T em eculaC A.gov .
S incerely,
M att Peters
Interim D irector of C omm un ity D evelopm ent
A tt achm ents: N otice of D eterm ination Form
Electro n ic Paym ent - Filing Fee R eceipt
C i t y o f T e m e c u l a
Com m unity D evelopm ent
P la nnin g D ivision N otice of D eterm ination
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-0751
FR OM : Planning Division
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
SU BJE C T : Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the
Public Resources Code
State Clearinghouse N o.: Not Available
Project Title: Texas Roadhouse (P A23-0341)
P roject Location: APN: 910-420-029
P roject D escription: Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse
restaurant
Lead A gency:
Contact P erson:
City of Temecula, County of Riverside
Scott Cooper Telephone N umber: (951) 506-5137
This is to advise you that the Interim Community Development Director for the City of Temecula has approved
the above described project on February 27, 2025 and has made the following determinations regarding this
project:
1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment.
2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by
the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.
3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project
will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR.
4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will
have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the EIR.
5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the EIR.
6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in
connection with the EIR.
This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report and Addendum that were prepared for the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the
City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590.
Signature: _
Matt Peters, Interim Director of Community Development
Date: ---------
Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office:
C A LI F O RN IA D E P A R T M E N T O F F IS H A ND G A M E
CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEM PTION
De Minimus Impact Finding
Project Proponent: GreenbergFarrow
Project Title: Texas Roadhouse (PA23-0341)
Location: APN: 910-420-029
Project Description: Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse restaurant
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
1. The Project consists of a Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse
restaurant
2. On October 11, 1994, the City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific
Plan (SP- 7) was approved on July 27, 1999 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 99-19. Amendment No. 2
to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved on January 28, 2003 by the adoption of
No. Ordinance 03-02. Amendment No. 3 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan was approved
July 22, 2008 by the adoption of Ordinance No. 08-03. Amendment No. 4 to the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan as approved on February 11, 2025 by the adoption of Resolution No. 2025-XX.
An addendum to the EIR was prepared and certified on September 26, 2006. The proposed project has
been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Temecula Regional Center EIR and
Addendum. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines
Section 15182 as the proposed restaurant development is in conformity with the Temecula Regional
Center Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the EIR and Addendum and has determined that
the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as
none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162)
exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require
major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the involvement of new significant
environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed
project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR and Addendum due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance,
which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the
time the previous EIR and Addendum was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one
or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR and Addendum; (b) there are significant effects
previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR and Addendum; (c)
there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible
and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City
declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or ( d) mitigation measures or alternatives which
are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR and Addendum would substantially reduce
one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure
or alternative. The application for a development plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot restaurant
is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addendum. The proposed project is
required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and Addendum.
C ert ifi cation :
I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not
individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of
the Fish and Game Code.
Matt Peters
Interim Director of Community Development
Date
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to consider the matter
described below:
CASE NO: PA23-0341 APPLICANT: Texas Roadhouse
PROPOSAL: A Development Plan for an approximately 8,000 square foot Texas Roadhouse
restaurant located at 40710 Winchester Road
ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the
proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) and Section 15162
(Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring
further environmental review under the aforementioned Sections exist. The Director
of Community Development will consider adopting a Notice of Determination for
the proposed project.
CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper (951) 506-513 7
PLACE OF HEARING:41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers
DATE OF HEARING: February 27, 2025 TIME OF HEARING: 1:30 PM
0 200 400 Feet
\
B,\NGRo
I I I A
The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area
at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Director of Community
Development Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website - TemeculaCA.gov and will be
available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to the Director regarding any item on the Agenda,
after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center
(41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website
- TemeculaCA.gov - and will be available for public review at the meeting.
Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Director of Community Development shall be filed within time required by,
and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding
seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Director of Community
Development shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.