Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParcel Map 23561-2 Parcel 23 Addendum Soils Report March 7, 2024 Mahir Investments, Inc. CWE 2220384.04 2661 Pummelo Ct. Escondido, California 92027 Attention: Mr. Chintu Patel Subject: Addendum and Update Geotechnical Report Proposed Self-Storage Facility, Assessor’s Parcel Number 910-272-002 Madison Avenue, Temecula, California References: 1) Christian Wheeler Engineering “Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Self-Storage Facility Assessor’s Parcel Number 910-272-002, Madison Avenue, Temecula, California”, dated September 23, 2022 (CWE 2220384.01) 2) Christian Wheeler Engineering “Preliminary Storm Water Infiltration Feasibility Study, Proposed Self-Storage Facility Assessor’s Parcel Number 910-272-002, Madison Avenue, Temecula, California”, dated September 26, 2022 (CWE 2220384.02) 3) Christian Wheeler Engineering “Response to Third-Party Geotechnical Peer Review, Proposed Self-Storage Facility Assessor’s Parcel Number 910-272-002, Madison Avenue, Temecula, California”, dated November 28, 2022 (CWE 2220384.03) Ladies and Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have prepared this updated geotechnical report to for the subject project. This report has been prepared as an addendum to our referenced geotechnical reports. As such, unless specifically modified or addressed herein, all of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in the above referenced reports remain applicable. PRELIMINARY SITE INFORMATION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION The subject site is an undeveloped commercial lot, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 910-272-002, which is located adjacent to and northeast of Madison Avenue, Temecula, California. Topographically, the site is characterized by a relatively level pad with an elevation of about 1052 to 1055 feet. An engineered slope CHRISTIAN WHEELER E N G I N E E R I N G Geotechnical & Geological Consulting ✦ Materials Inspection & Testing ✦ Building Envelope Consulting ✦ Laboratory Services www.christianwheeler.com ✦ info@christianwheeler.com ✦ (619) 555-1700 CLEARED BY CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC WORKS valerie.caragan 04/04/2024 04/04/2024 04/04/2024 04/04/20 CWE 2220384.04 March 7, 2024 Page No. 2 up to approximately 10 feet in height ascends from the northeast perimeter of the lot at an approximate inclination of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) to the Interstate 15 Freeway. The site was mass graded approximately 30 years ago and review of the referenced aerial photographs indicates that the site was first used for agricultural purposes since at least the 1930s. As noted during our surface reconnaissance of the site conducted on March 7, 2024, the current site conditions are generally the same as they were at the time of our field investigation and the preparation of the above refenced geotechnical report (CWE, 2022a). We understand that the subject project will consist of the construction of an approximately 28,000-square-foot, four-story, concrete and/or masonry structure with parking and drive areas. The self-storage building and associated improvements are expected to be supported by conventional shallow foundations and the structure will have a concrete slab-on-grade floor. Planned site grading is expected to consist of cuts and fill less than five feet from the current grades. As part of the storm water management for the project two bio-retention basins have been proposed within the northerly and southerly portions of the site. CONCLUSIONS In general, it is our professional opinion and judgment that the subject property is suitable for the construction of the subject project. The recommendations contained in the referenced report remain applicable unless superseded by the recommendations contained herein. RECOMMENDATIONS SEISMIC DESIGN FACTORS Updated Seismic design parameters were determined in accordance with Chapter 16 of the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and the applicable sections of ASCE/SEI 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. For the subject site, correlated shear wave velocities measured/estimated in our CPT-1 indicate that the upper 100 feet of geologic subgrade can be characterized as Soil Site Class D (CWE, 2022a). It can be noted that sites underlain by liquefaction-susceptible soils should be designated as Soil Site Class F, requiring a site response analysis. However, as discussed in Section 20.3.1 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, for structures having a fundamental period of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 second, it is not required to perform a site response analysis and the site classification can be determined based on the code. We anticipate that the proposed structures will have a fundamental period less than 0.5 second and can therefore be designed using Soil Site Class D as described above. CWE 2220384.04 March 7, 2024 Page No. 3 In accordance with Section 11.4.8 of ASCE/SEI 7-16, structures on Soil Site Class D or E sites that have a mapped MCER spectral response acceleration parameter (S1) value greater than or equal to 0.2 require a site- specific ground motion hazard analysis or the seismic response coefficient (CS) must be adjusted to adequately characterize the site response (Exception 2). As noted in the Commentary for Section 11, “In general, this exception effectively limits the requirements for site-specific hazard analyses to very tall and or flexible structures at Site Class D sites.” The following Table I presents the updated seismic design parameters based on Exception 2 in Section 11.4.8. TABLE I: CBC 2022/ASCE 7-16 – SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS CBC – Chapter 16 Section Seismic Design Parameter Recommended Value Section 1613.2.2 Soil Site Class D Figure 1613.2.1 (1) MCER Acceleration for Short Periods (0.2 sec), Ss 1.578 g Figure 1613.2.1 (2) MCER Acceleration for 1.0 Sec Periods (1.0 sec), S1 0.589 g Table 1613.2.3 (1) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.000 Table 1613.3.3 (2) Site Coefficient, Fv 1.711 Section 1613.2.3 SMS = MCER Spectral Response at 0.2 sec. = (Ss)(Fa) 1.578 g Section 1613.2.3 SM1 = MCER Spectral Response at 1.0 sec. = (S1)(Fv) 1.008 g Section 1613.2.4 SDS = Design Spectral Response at 0.2 sec. = 2/3(SMS) 1.052 g Section 1613.2.4 SD1 = Design Spectral Response at 1.0 sec. = 2/3(SM1) 0.672 g Section 1613.2.5 Seismic Design Category D ASCE 7-16 Fig. 22-14 Mapped Long-Period Transition Period, TL 8 sec Section 1803.2.12 PGAM per Section 11.8.3 of ASCE 7 0.73 g Probable ground shaking levels at the site could range from slight to moderate, depending on such factors as the magnitude of the seismic event and the distance to the epicenter. It is likely that the site will experience the effects of at least one moderate to large earthquake during the life of the proposed improvements. CLOSURE If you have any questions after reviewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, CHRISTIAN WHEELER ENGINEERING David R. Russell, C.E.G. #2215 Shawn Caya, R.G.E. #2748 DRR:scc:drr ec: chintupatel80@gmail.com; dcamargo@noaainc.com; jch@noaainc.com