HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-03 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 2025-03
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA23-0497, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
(TTM 38813)TO SUBDIVIDE TWO(2)EXISTING PARCELS
INTO NINE (9) PARCELS ON 11.4 ACRES LOCATED ON
THE SOUTH SIDE OF PAUBA ROAD APPROXIMATELY
600 FEET EAST OF SHOWALTER ROAD AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (APNS: 945-090-001,
020)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On December 21, 2023, Beam Management, LLC filed Planning Application No.
PA23-0497, a Tentative Tract Map, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan
and Development Code.
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time
and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and
environmental review on March 19, 2025, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA23-0497,
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Tentative Tract Map (Development Code Section 16.09.140):
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and City of Temecula Municipal Code.
Tentative Parcel Map No. 38813 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and
meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision
Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code. The property associated with
Tentative Parcel Map No. 38813 is identified within the City of Temecula Housing Element
Vacant Lands Inventory for residential development and achieves Policy 1.1 of the General
Plan Housing Element by providing inventory of land at a low density that will
accommodate the existing and projected housing needs in the City.
B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has
not been designated for conservation or agricultural land, and is not subject to the
California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Map.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed
by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed
by the Municipal Code. Specifically, the Municipal Code allows for 0.5 to 2.9 dwelling
units per acre with a minimum lot size of 1.0 acre. The proposed project's density is 1.27
dwelling units per acre with a minimum lot size of 1.0 acre and an average lot size of 1.27
acres. As such, the site is suitable for the proposed development.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of
Approval are either:
1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or
2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made,
pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or
other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the
environmental impact report.
The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and based on a Section 15183 analysis, it has been determined the project
could not have a more significant impact on the environment than what was analyzed in
the GPU EIR (SCH No. 2003061041).
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious
public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable
building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health,
and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable
building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or
occupancy permits.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The project consists ofa Tentative Parcel Map on vacant property. Any future development
on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building
Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those
previously acquired by the public will be provided.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The
City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts.
H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
(Quimby).
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby
Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the
project.
Section 3. No Net Loss Findings.
Government Code section 65863(b)(1)states that"No city,county,or city and county shall,
by administrative, quasi-judicial, legislative, or other action, reduce, or require or permit the
reduction of,the residential density for any parcel identified to meet its current share of the regional
housing need or any unaccommodated portion of the regional housing need from the prior planning
period to, or allow development of any parcel at, a lower residential density, as defined in
paragraphs(1)and(2)of subdivision(g),unless the city,county,or city and county makes written
findings supported by substantial evidence of both of the following:
1) The reduction is consistent with the adopted general plan, including
the housing element.
2) The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate
to meet the requirements of Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the jurisdiction's share of the
regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The finding shall include a quantification of the
remaining unmet need for the jurisdiction's share of the regional housing need at each income level
and the remaining capacity of sites identified in the housing element to accommodate that need by
income level."
The project site is identified on the City's Housing Element site inventory. The site
inventory provides that APN 945-090-001 is anticipated to produce 3 above moderate income units
and APN 945-090-020 10 is anticipated to produce 10 above moderate income units. The project
is proposing to construct 9 above moderate income units in total and,therefore,there is a shortfall
of 4 above moderate income units from what was projected in the Housing Element.
The reduction in units is consistent with the General Plan as the project is proposing a
development that is within the density range permitted by the General Plan. The Low Density
Residential district has a density range of 0.5 to 2.9 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project's
density is 1.27 dwelling units per acre which falls within that density range. Moreover, while the
Housing Element projected that 13 above moderate income units in total would be constructed on
these two parcels, the Housing Element included a buffer of 851 above moderate income units.
Therefore,the reduction is consistent with the General Plan and the Housing Element.
The remaining sites in the Housing Element site inventory are adequate to meet the City's
Regional Housing Needs Assessment("RHNA"). The City's RHNA allocation for the 2021-2029
planning period identified that the City needed to plan for 658 extremely low income unit, 671
very low income units, 702 low income units, 757 moderate income units and 1, 249 above
moderate income units for a total of 4,034 housing units. As noted above, the site inventory
identified that there would be 13 above moderate income units constructed on the property.
However, the City's Housing Element also identified a surplus of 851 above moderate units.
Therefore, the 4 unit deficit in above moderate units that is being proposed by this project can be
accommodated by the surplus. As such, there will be no net loss in the residential capacity in the
City.
Section 4. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the
Tentative Tract Map Application:
A. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 provides that projects which are consistent
with the development density established by a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which
an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified "shall not require additional
environmental review except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific
effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The City of Temecula General Plan Update
(GPU) EIR was certified in May 2005 (SCH No. 2003061041). The EIR examined the potential
environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the build-out of the project site. The proposed
project is consistent with the 2005 GPU, and because the proposed project would not result in any
new or more severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and
disclosed as part of the GPU EIR, no additional environmental review is required for the proposed
project beyond the analysis and conclusions provided in Section 15183 analysis.
Section 5. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
Planning Application No. PA23-0497, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 38813) to subdivide two (2)
existing parcels into nine(9)parcels on 11.4 acres located south side of Pauba Road approximately
600 feet east of Showalter Road, and makes a finding of exemption under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Final Conditions of Approval set forth on
Exhibit A, Plan Reductions set forth in Exhibit B, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183
Compliance Memorandum set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
PASSED,APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission
this 19th day of March, 2025.
Lance Turl rejo, C it
ATTEST:
tko,1*
Matt Peters
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Matt Peters, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the
forgoing PC Resolution No. 2025-03 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of March,2025,by the following
vote:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Solis, Turley-Trejo, Watson, Watts
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
)4 drN,#)'1('
V
Matt Peters
Secretary
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE
Planning Application Number: PA23-0497
Parcel Number(s):
945-090-001
945-090-020
By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not
limited to) any referenced documents, local, state, or federal regulations, statement of operations,
hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or
reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and
understand them. I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of
Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the
Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval
to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we
will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification
requirements imposed by those conditions.
Property Owner Printed Name Property Owner Signature & Date
Beam Management LLC 3/20/25
Applicant Printed Name Applicant Signature & Date
Bill Parker052c— 3/20/25
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
FINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA23-0497
Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38813) to subdivide two existing parcels into
nine (9) parcels on 11.4 acres located on the south side of Pauba Road
approximately 600 feet east of Showalter Road.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 945-090-001
945-090-020
MSHCP Category: Less than 8.0 dwelling units
DIF Category: Residential-Detached
TUMF Category: Residential-Single Family
Quimby Category: Single Family Residential (Attached Garage)
New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A(Project Not Located in the Uptown Specific Plan Area)
Approval Date: March 19, 2025
Expiration Date: March 19, 2028
PLANNING DIVISION
Within 48 Hours of the Approval
Page 1 of 15
1. Applicant Filing Notice of Exemption. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED:
The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Exemption as required under
Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062
within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer
has not filed the Notice of Exemption as required above, the approval for the project granted
shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will
result in an extended period of time for legal challenges.
FEES:
Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee.
The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions.
FILING:
The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of approval via
email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Exemption within 24 hours of
approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be
filed online with the Riverside County Assessor— County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the
CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA.
COPY OF FILINGS:
The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours.
General Requirements
2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and
Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers,
agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials
(collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions,
lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without
limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the
Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related
entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy
any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in
any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of
any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the
City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails
to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to
defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right
to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other
Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection
therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be
construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed
challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall
estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City
or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as
they become due.
Page 2 of 15
3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three (3) years of the approval date; otherwise,
it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the three (3) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit.
A modification made to an approved Tentative Map does not affect the original approval date
of a Tentative Map.
4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being
filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions
of time, one (1) year at a time.
A modification made to an approved Tentative Map does not affect the original approval date
of a Tentative Map.
5. Compliance with 15183 Memorandum. The project and all subsequent projects within this
site shall comply with all requirements identified within the 15183 Memorandum dated
February 18, 2025.
6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially
conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division.
7. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan
check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than
30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed.
8. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or
revisions to the approval of this project.
9. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public
Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit
10. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the
Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site,
archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears
to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall
immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community
Development at their sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of
money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an
independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to
assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an
archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Community Development shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Community Development shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or
development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been
approved by the Director of Community Development."
Page 3 of 15
11. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural
Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place
prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the
Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading
permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the
designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development
scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any
cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga
monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the
project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources
discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to
monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited
authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be
identified.
12. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction
(inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified
archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make
recommendations as to treatment."
13. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to
stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their
designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered
on the property."
14. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading
Plan: "A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and
redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated
monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property."
15. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section
of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe
for proper treatment and disposition."
16. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved."
17. Non-Disclosure. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site
of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be
disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public
Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption outlined in California
Government Code 7927.000, parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public
disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption outlined in
California Government Code 7927.000.
Page 4 of 15
18. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the
Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the
pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for
burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that
shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing
owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the
project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls
are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following
recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur
during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following
exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion
and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory
agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must
be made by a qualified biologist." If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30
days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed.
19. Precise Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved
by the Planning Division.
Page 5 of 15
20. Final Disposition. If Native American cultural resources are discovered during
ground-disturbing activity, the following procedures shall be carried out in consultation with the
Pechanga Band of Indians, for the final disposition of the discoveries:
a) One or more of the following treatments, which are listed in order of priority, shall be
employed, and evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula:
i. Preservation-in-place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means
avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no
development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at
least, the recording of a legal instrument to protect the future reburial area from any future
impacts in perpetuity, such as a conservation easement or other binding restriction,
covenant or condition agreed upon in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Indians.
Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have
been completed, with the exception that sacred items, burial goods, and Native American
human remains are excluded from this process. The reburial process shall be culturally
appropriate. The listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the
confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a
confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Requests.
iii. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a
culturally appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation facility that meets State
Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of
Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The
collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be
accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of
curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological
materials have been received and that all fees have been paid shall be provided by the
landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items,
burial goods, and Native American human remains. Results concerning findings of any
inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report. Evidence of
compliance with this mitigation measure, if a significant archaeological resource is found,
shall be provided to the City of XXX upon the completion of a treatment plan and final
report detailing the significance and treatment finding.
21. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall
retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to
monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological
resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural
resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will
be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of
any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors
shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall
also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent
cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the
end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern
Information Center at UC, Riverside.
Page 6 of 15
22. Human Remains. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a
Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all
ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any
newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resource's
evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be
exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any
potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall
be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also
have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural
resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of
all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the South Coastal
Information Center at UC, San Diego.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
23. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of
Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The
City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these
fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the
provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of
contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF
24. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15,
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the
appropriate City fee. Developers may request an audit of impact fees and/or may request
notice for meetings related to the fee account or fund information.
25. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough
grading plans including all structural setback measurements.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
26. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure
of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level
rates and charges to all prospective purchasers.
27. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied
with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
28. Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning
Division.
29. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication (Quimby)
requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 0.14 acres of parkland, based
upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement does not include a credit for
private recreational opportunities as no facilities are proposed.
Page 7 of 15
30. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall
be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes:
a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed
outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar
Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
b. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone.
31. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall
be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall
include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking
areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including
parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new
CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of$2,000. The applicant shall be responsible
for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required
during the course of the review.
32. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the
Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include
such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to
protect the interests of the City and its residents.
33. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and
expense.
34. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners
Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public
Works Director, and the City Attorney.
35. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the
effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common
areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project's Water
Quality Management Plan.
36. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed,
operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
37. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated
without prior City approval.
38. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not
maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making do demand
and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the Temecula Municipal Code.
The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not
promptly reimbursed.
39. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an
appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the
common areas and facilities.
Page 8 of 15
40. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the
Declarant's signature, to read as follows:
CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA
The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. (insert#) require the City of Temecula
to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has
been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the
requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these
CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other
provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements
and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls,
assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters.
Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs.
Matt Peters
Community Development Director
Approved as to Form:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
41. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as
follows:
Article
CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA
1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number 38813 requires the City to
review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel.
2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review
is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the
requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these
CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other
provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements
and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls,
assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural
matters.
3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use
entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and
regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State
or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the
CC&Rs.
4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the
express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula.
Page 9 of 15
42. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the
right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such
assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to
control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development.
Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership
of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of
maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City
for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of
compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any
such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
43. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map
Recordation.
44. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the
Planning Division.
Outside Agencies
45. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County
Flood Control Districts transmittal dated January 9, 2024, a copy of which is attached. The
fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's
check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit(unless deferred to a later date
by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
46. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the
recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's
transmittal dated August 9, 2024, a copy of which is attached.
47. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set
forth in the Verdantas'transmittal dated July 1, 2024, a copy of which is attached.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
48. Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Final Map submittal for review and
approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to
be resubmitted for further review and revision.
49. Permit restriction. No permits shall be issued unless future Development Plan applications
are submitted for approval.
50. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from
Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading
shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City
codes/standards.
51. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction,
encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite
improvements.
Page 10 of 15
52. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include
private street plans, storm drain plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review
and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards.
53. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately
maintained.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
54. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the
Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any
governmental agency.
55. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans,
executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities.
56. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with
the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply
with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the
property.
57. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District;
b. Eastern Municipal Water District; or other affected agencies
58. Easements. Note the following:
a. A 34-foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access
for all private streets and drives.
b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map.
c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities,
etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary.
All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as
directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way
shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall
be added to the Tract Map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings
and obstructions."
59. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained.
60. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless
otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private
streets:
a. Improve Street - Carol Ann Circle (Private Street — 34' R/E) to include installation of
full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative
Tract or Parcel Map.
b. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards.
c. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be
identified on the site plan).
d. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration,
stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the
Fire Department and the Department of Public Works.
e. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees.
Page 11 of 15
61. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines,
except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15,
Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The
developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility
agency and for obtaining the necessary easements.
62. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water,
sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall
be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider's standards.
Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The
developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall
be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements.
63. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
64. Election Proceeding. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Finance
Department to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of street lighting into the
appropriate maintenance program (Service Level B). All cost associated with this process
shall be borne by the developer.
65. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the
parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards).
Prior to final approval, the City's GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify
accuracy and compatibility.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
66. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion &
sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to
the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all
construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff.
Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at:
www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM
67. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and
entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion &sediment control improvements.
68. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the
State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for
Construction Activities and shall provide the following:
a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB);
b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and
c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP
Developer(QSD).
Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's
storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated
and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely
updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review
www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link:
http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml
Page 12 of 15
69. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit
a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan
submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive
acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite
at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement
shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall
record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP
template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval,
the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES
requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is
responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement.
70. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City
that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee
has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required.
71. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and
submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside
County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to
mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the
development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed
offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff
shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without
damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the
adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to
convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project.
72. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted
to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil
conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and
preliminary pavement sections.
73. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist's
requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during
entitlement.
74. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission
or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format
is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document
information shall be noted on the approved grading plan.
75. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of
the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
76. American's with Disabilities Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the
proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within
the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property
owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway
Code Section 5610.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
77. Final Map. Tract Map Number 38813 shall be approved and recorded.
Page 13 of 15
78. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan — Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the
latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the
City Engineer.
b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance — All proposed public and
private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and
specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have
ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated
appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design
shall be incorporated in the project's street improvement plans or in a separate street light
plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer.
c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights—All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety
lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and
specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer.
d. Street Light Service Point Addressing — The developer shall coordinate with the PW
Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required
street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City
and shall be located within public's right of way or within duly dedicated public easements.
79. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review
and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading
plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer
for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
80. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans
and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site
work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP
Operation and Maintenance agreement.
81. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable
utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the
completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works.
82. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or
broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of
Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City
Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional
Code Section 8771.
83. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies
and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works.
84. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Verification. As part of the WQMP approval, the
Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES
requirements. Should the project require alternative compliance, the developer is responsible
for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
Page 14 of 15
85. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the
construction of all residential maps per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. The fire flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal
Code Section 15.16.020).
86. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances
per CFC Appendix C. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on fire
access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single-family dwellings and tract homes
hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on
the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow
shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to
be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C
and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
87. Turning Radius (Cul-de-sac). Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1,320 feet.
Minimum outside turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 37-feet for single family dwelling
tracts. (CFC Chapter 5 along with the Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
88. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained
to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide
all-weather driving capabilities of asphalt or cement. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW
with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to
building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus
access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020)
89. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads/streets shall have an
unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for residential home developments which also
includes account for any trash bins and parking on the street roads and 20 feet for custom
homes residential driveways with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6
inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
90. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15
percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020).
Page 15 of 15
Imo,
!��►�� City of Temecula
Community Development
,..,......._.
,. ' ; ' 41000 Main Street • Temecula,CA 92590
%, 1989 -`,:.- Phone(951)694-6400 • Fax(951)694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov
VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL
CEQAProcessi ngna,asrclkrec.com
March 20, 2025
Supervising Legal Certification Clerk
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751
Riverside, CA 92501-0751
SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA23-0497, a
Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38813) to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into
nine (9) parcels on 11.4 acres located on the south side of Pauba Road
approximately 600 feet east of Showalter Road
Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to
Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to
enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section
21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under
protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner
inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and
14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a$25.00 filing fee.
Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after
the 30-day posting to the email listed below.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or
at email scott.cooperra?TemeculaCA.gov .
Sincerely,
tik
Matt Peters
Director of Community Development
Attachments: Notice of Exemption Form, Electronic Payment- Filing Fee Receipt
City of Temecula
Community Development
Planning Division Notice of Exemption
TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division
County of Riverside City of Temecula
P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street
Riverside,CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590
Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 38813 (PA23-0497)
Description of Project: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38813) to subdivide two (2) existing parcels into nine
(9)parcels on 11.4 acres.
Project Location: APNs: 945-090-001, 945-090-020
Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside
The Planning Commission approved the above described project on March 19, 2025, and found that the project
is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
Exempt Status: (check one)
❑ Ministerial(Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268);
El Declared Emergency(Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a));
❑ Emergency Project(Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c));
❑ Statutory Exemptions(Section Number: )
® Categorical Exemption: (Section Number 15183,Projects Consistent with the General Plan)
El Other:
Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt:
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 provides that projects which are consistent with the development density
established by a Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR)has
been certified "shall not require additional environmental review except as might be necessary to examine
whether there are project-specific effects which are peculiar to the project or its site." The City of Temecula
General Plan Update (GPU) EIR was certified in May 2005 (SCH No. 2003061041). The EIR examined the
potential environmental impacts that may occur as a result of the build-out of the project site. The proposed
project is consistent with the 2005 GPU, and because the proposed project would not result in any new or more
severe impacts to the environment beyond what was previously evaluated and disclosed as part of the GPU EIR,
no additional environmental review is required for the proposed project beyond the analysis and conclusions
provided in Section 15183 analysis.
Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137
Signature: IA ikk Date: 3114/Vi
Matt Peters
Director of Community Development
Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: