Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121190 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD DECEMBER 11, 1990 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 PM at the Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Deputy City Clerk June S. Greek. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Nelson, Calvary Chapel. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Moore. PUBLIC FORUM Ray McLaughlin, 30025 Front Street, requested that the problem on La Serena Way, caused by the Buie Development, be placed on the agenda for discussion. Gary Thomhill, Planning Director, reported that the height of the slope in question is actually less than approved on the specific plan. Mr. McLaughlin stated the point of the slope is six feet higher than it should be, and it does not have a shelf. Gary Thornhill reported that staff would be happy to meet with Mr. McLaughlin. Nate Dibiasi, 30445 Mira Loma Drive, objected to the reelection of Mayor Parks for a second term, stating he felt this position should be rotated. Minutes 12/11/90 1 CONSENT CAI,ENDAR It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to approve the Consent Calendar Items 1 - 5. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None e Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. City Treamrer's Report for the Months Ending August 31, 1990, September 30, 1990 and October 31, 1990 2.1 Receive and file. Resolution Approving l,ist of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A. Cancellation of the Regular City Council Meetln_~ of December 75, 1990 4.1 Approve the cancellation of the City Council meeting scheduled for December 25, 1990. Minutes 12/11/90 2 Release of Monument bond for Tract No. 20848 5.1 Authorize the release of monument bond for Tract No. 20848. 5.2 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. PUBLIC HEARlINGS 6. Tentative Tract Map No. ~6549 and Plot Plan No. 10864 Gary Thornhill, Planning Director, reported this is a request by the applicant to subdivide 22 acres into 260 condominium units. He said this project was originally approved by the County, at which time an appeal was filed, which was referred to the City of Temecula. He said the City reviewed it and denied it based on concerns regarding drainage, density, open space and project design issues. He stated after numerous discussions with the applicant, a much superior design and project is before the Council at this time. He stated this project has changed from apartments to condominiums, with a reduction of density. He reported the project was approved by the Planning Commission on a 3/2 vote, and staff recommends the following: Adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Tract Map No. 26549 and Plot Plan No. 10864; Adopt Resolution No. 90-119, approving Tentative Tract Map No. 26549; based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval; and e Adopt Resolution No. 90-120 approving Plot Plan No. 10864, based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. City Attorney Field reported the Council received a letter alleging Commissioner Chiniaeff had a conflict of interest when he voted on this matter before the Planning Commission. As a result, an investigation was launched and Mr. Field reported his findings concluded that no conflict of interest existed. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, reported on the drainage issues for this property. He explained this project currently drains directly on to the adjoining property owned by the Oder family. Mr. Stewart stated after development of the property, none of the site will drain on the adjacent area. Minutes 12/11/90 3 Councilmember Mufioz asked if there had been discussions with the applicant regarding water retention facilities on site? Doug Stewart answered the applicant's representative will present the Council with this information. Mayor Parks opened the public heating at 7:40 PM. Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, representing the applicant, stated the applicant has worked with staff and the Oder family, and agreement has been reached on a series of conditions that would alleviate their concerns. He stated these conditions were offered at the Planning Commission Hearing but were not appended to the conditions, however they are still offered. Mr. Markham stated in regards to a first flush provision, the applicant would propose that down stream catch basins provide for stripping surface trash and sediment. Councilmember Lindemans asked how the question of school children crossing the Oder property would be handled. Mr. Markham answered that the applicant would provide for a ten foot easement dedication, so if developing a walkway can be worked out by the school district, the land will be available. Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 8:02 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 8:03 PM. Robert L. Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Drive, #63, stated his concerns regarding flooding. He said the problem with children crossing his property to go to school is a safety issue, explaining there is a dangerous bank and deep flowing creek, when it rains. Mr. Oder stated that he and Larry Markham agreed upon additional conditions of approval that would satisfy both parties, and requested they be included. He stated he could not understand why the Planning Commission did not include these conditions of approval at their hearing. Mr. Oder asked the City Engineer to address the issue of flood control and the encasement of the 15" Sewer Line. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated the Flood Control District has reviewed this proposal and has accepted the drainage from this project into Empire Creek, and explained the drainage is not a major amount of water. He said the project developer has agreed to put that water into the creek below the existing structure in question. He reported Flood Control is in the process of making the appropriate changes to this structure. Mr. Oder stated he is concerned about erosion control, and although the applicant has agreed to provide erosion control year-round, this condition is not in writing. Mayor Parks asked Mr. Oder if he has a list of conditions that are not listed? Mr. Oder answered he does have a list. Minutes 12/11/90 4 Robert J. Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Drive, //63, stated he had expected adjustments in the conditions of approval from discussions at the Planning Commission hearing, specifically dealing with agreed points. He stated he was disappointed that they did not appear, and asked that they be added to the conditions. Councilmember Lindemans asked why agreed upon conditions were not included in the conditions of approval. Gary Thornhill stated that no additional conditions were imposed by the Planning Commission at the hearing. Helen Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Drive,//63, said she felt there is presently a large vacancy level in apartments which will cause other social problems and approval of this project would only aggravate this situation. Tamar C. Stein, 2049 Century Park East, //2800, Los Angeles, representing the Oder family stated her first request is that the Council direct staff to add the conditions that have been proposed by the applicant and agreed upon by the Oders. She said they were rejected by the Planning Commission, but the Oder's feel they are the right conditions to solve the problems that are present. Mayor Parks asked Mr. Markham if the applicant agrees with the conditions. Mr. Markham stated he has a few minor variations regarding the insurance issue. He stated the applicant would provide proof of insurance to the City, and any adjacent property owner could obtain a copy. He said he does not have a problem with the CC&R condition that this would not be mass leased, but asked that the Council condition future condominium projects in the same way. Councilmember Mufioz stated he feels if a project is approved as condominiums, it should remain as condominiums. He stated he applauds the applicant for initiating first flush measures at the site. Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 8:40 PM. Gary Thomhill stated staff has reviewed the requested conditions of approval and has no problem adding them at this time. He explained some of them are already handled with the normal process, however staff does not object to these being imposed. City Attorney Field said it is not clear that the Oder family and the applicant are discussing the same issues. City Manager Dixon suggested having both parties initial the new conditions. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adopt negative declaration and approve Tentative Tract Map No. 26549 and Plot Plan No. 10864, subject to the addition of conditions of approval; and adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes 12/11/90 5 RF~OLUTION NO. 90-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 10864 TO CONSTRUCT A 260 UNIT TOWNHOUSE COMPLEX ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 22.22 ACRES LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011 RESOLUTION NO. 90-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26549 TO SUBDIVIDE A 22.22 ACRE PARCEL INTO A 260 UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011 Tamar Stein stated she would need to review the conditions before initialing these conditions. Mayor Parks suggested continuing this item until after a recess at which time the parties could meet. City Attorney Field suggested reopening the public hearing so that new testimony could be heard. Mayor Parks reopened the public hearing at 8:50 PM. RECESS Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:50 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:10 PM. 6. (CONT.) Mayor Parks asked Gary Thornhill, Planning Director, if the additional conditions of approval had been reviewed by both parties? Mr. Thornhill asked that the meeting be adjourned to the CSD Meeting to give the parties more time. Mayor Parks adjourned to the CSD Meeting at 9:11 PM. The meeting was reconvened following the CSD meeting at 9:20 PM. 6. (CONT.) Minutes 12/11/90 6 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to withdraw the motion. The motion was unanimously carded. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to continue this item to the end of the agenda. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Parks called a one minute break to change the tape at 9:21 PM. The meeting was reconvened at 9:22 PM. 7. Parcel Map 2521~/Change of Zone No. 5663 Councilmember Lindemans excused himself from discussion and voting due to a conflict of interest. Gary Thomhill, Planning Director, stated the public hearing was continued from the November 27, 1990 meeting, for the purpose of preparing the appropriate resolution for approval of the project, and for staff to make a recommendation relative to the one acre designation. He reported the recommendation is for RR, 1 acre designation. He said in addition, staff is recommending the replacement of Condition No. 37, contained in the staff report. He reported the applicant is in agreement with the additional condition. Steve Doulames, 23769 Five Tribes Trail, Murrieta, stated he is in agreement with all the conditions of approval. Luis Morgan, 240 Liefer Road, stated he and the other property owners were not properly notified. He suggested that if the zone change is approved a condition be placed on the area limiting mobile homes to double-wide units with an age limit on them. City Manager Dixon reported the only way to add such a condition as Mr. Morgan suggests would be by the development of CC&R's for the property. Mayor Parks closed the public hearing at 9:30 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE3'W. CULA APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 25212 TO SUBDIVIDE A 5.02 ACRE PARCEL INTO FOUR PARCELS AND TO CHANGE THE EXISTING ZONING FROM R-R-2.5 TO R-R-1 LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST Minutes 12/11/90 7 CORNER OF NICOLAS AND LIEFER ROADS AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 914-280-012 Councilmember Mufioz expressed a desire to hear from more property owners in the area. City Manager Dixon suggested developing an interim plan for the area, involving all property owners to come back before the Council in 90 days. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-26 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF SAID CITY IN THE CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION CONTAINED IN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 5663, CHANGING THE ZONE FROM R-R-2.5 (RURAL RESIDFANTIAL - 2.5 ACRE MINIMLrM LOT SIZE) TO R- R-1 (RURAL RESIDENTIAL - 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) ON 5.02 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND LIEFER ROAD. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans Minutes 12/11/90 8 It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to move to Agenda Item No. 11. The motion was unanimously carried. 11. Sphere of Influence gtudy City Manager Dixon reported this matter was considered two weeks ago and staff was directed to meet with other groups who would be affected. He stated he and Consultant Bill Meacham met with groups from the East Side, or the new CSA-149, and also met with representatives from the Wine Country. He said the City has come up with a boundary for an easterly sphere. He stated the line was extended to include the Vail Ranch and Red Hawk Development. He said further Council direction was to meet with the Council-elect from Murrieta. He reported it had been resolved that the boundary between the two cities east of Winchester Road would be in the sphere of Temecula, with a caveat that property owners within that area not designated would still have the right to request inclusion, not only in terms of sphere but annexation. He said a boundary was drawn to the west, which is southerly of the wildlife preserves. Mr. Dixon emphasized that inclusion in the sphere does not automatically mean annexation. Bill Meacham stated the map posted shows a revised sphere. He said the areas removed from the original map are the Wine Country and some adjoining properties. He said because of the Indian reservation, Vail Lake was also left out of the sphere. He said Vail Ranch and Red Hawk were included. He said the sphere would include the French Valley area, Lake Skinner, the Santa Rosa CSA area and down to the San Diego County border, including much of the commercial area of Highway 79. Michael Huebner, 45850 Via Vaquero Road, representing 800 people in the Santa Rosa CSA area, stated this area requests exclusion from the City of Tem~ula sphere. He stated this area has its own CSA area which provides services necessary. Allen Barnum, 46569 E1 Vianto Seco Drive, read a statement from the West Side Association Council, opposing being included in the City's Sphere of Influence. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to extend the meeting until 11:00 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Fred W. Grab, 37795 Ashfield Lane, Winchester, opposed being included in the Sphere of Influence. John Moramarcho, P.O. Box 906, asked that Lake Skinner be excluded in the City's Sphere of Influence. Ken Barnes, Sphere. 39695 Berenda Road, asked that Lake Skinner be excluded in the City's Minutes 12/11/90 9 Steve Corona, 29926 Corte Tolano, asked that his property now be included in the Sphere of Influence and requested that Lake Skinner not be included. Wendy Woolum 37850 Ashfield Lane, said she owns property at the gate of Lake Skinner and asked if this is included in the City's Sphere. City Manager Dixon answered at this time it is not included. Councilmember Moore asked if all of Winchester Road is included in the City' s sphere or just to centerline? City Manager Dixon stated it will include all of Winchester Road. Mayor Parks asked about the area surrounding Lake Skinner, and asked if the specific plans that have indicated a desire to annex to the City have been excluded. Mr. Meacham stated that five property owners north of Winchester have indicated a desire to annex. City Manager Dixon stated that the two cities, Temecula and Murrieta, have agreed on the area Temecula will file, however if property owners wish to annex into Temecula, they will not be opposed by Murrieta. Councilmember Mufioz stated that at some point the City needs to submit it's sphere and let further changes be made by LAFCO. Councilmember Birdsall said it does not appear to be advantageous to go beyond the ridgeline on the west side. She stated these residents do not wish to be included in the City, and suggested excluding this area. Mayor Parks called a one minute break at 10:20 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 10:21 PM. A straw vote was taken on extending the City's Sphere of Influence on Rancho California Road up to the ridge line. The vote carried as follows: The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None A straw vote was taken to include Lake Skinner in the Sphere of Influence. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mufioz, Parks Minutes 12/11/90 10 NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None A straw vote was taken on including a corridor on Winchester/Highway 79 with the agreement that the line may vary one side or another along Winchester Road based upon the owners desires. The vote carded as follows: The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemarts to direct staff to make adjustments to the boundaries and to file an application for consideration of the Sphere of Influence by LAFCO. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Solid Waste Haulers Birdsall, Lindemarts, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None City Attorney Field reported Items 8, 9 and 10 constitute a three step process to address solid waste. He recommended giving all haulers notice that permits expire in no later than five years. He stated the second action is to transfer authority of collecting a rate schedule from the County to the City. It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to: Authorize the City Attorney to notify solid waste haulers that their permits expire in no later than five years; and 8.1 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: Minutes 12/11/90 11 RESOLUTION NO. 90-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING FEES PURSUANT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 657 REGULATING THE COLLECTION, TRANSFER AND REMOVAL OF SOLID WASTE The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Inte_~rated Waste Management Ordinance City Attorney Field stated this is an integrated waste management ordinance. He distributed an amended version addressing gardeners who do their own hauling. He said this ordinance would authorize the City to issue franchises and set the franchise fee at eight percent (8%). He reported it would also authorize the City Manager to establish the type of containers to be used, and set the collection as once weekly for residential and twice weekly for food service establishments. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 90-27 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS GOVERNING INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING REFUSE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES WITHIN THE CITY, AUTHORIZING THE FURNISHING OF SUCH SERVICES BY THE CITY OR PURSUANT TO FRANCHISE OR PERMIT, AND REPEALING RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 657 WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks Minutes 12/11/90 12 NOES: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 10. Solid Waste Haulinff and Recyclinff - Request for Proposal~ City Attorney Field asked that the Council not take formal action at this time but continue the matter to the meeting of January 8, 1991, to allow time for consideration of the attached Request For Proposals. He stated this is a time for comments from the Council and the public. Councilmember Lindemans asked that the financial competency of the bidder be seriously considered. Councilmember Moore asked what provisions were made for interruption of service, such as a strike. City Attorney Field answered that in time of a strike, the City would have the authority to take over service responsibilities. City Manager Dixon explained that a cash deposit would be required in a sufficient amount, and if the hauler does not produce, these funds would be used to contract with another provider. City Attorney Field stated this does not include recycling, however the RFP will ask for proposals in that area. Alan Ng, 2955 Avenida Del Sol, representing the Temecula Valley High School Earth Club, asked that curb side recycling be enacted as soon as possible. Councilmember Mufioz asked if the system would require one container for recyclables and another for other items, or some other kind of system. City Attorney Field answered it will be the same system that is used in areas surrounding Temecula, which uses a 17 gallon container for all recyclables and another container for everything else. Joe Hreha, Manager of Information Systems, stated the feeling of Riverside County is that a 25 % reduction will not be attained without green waste recycling. He stated the present trend is to add a container for green waste. Councilmember Mufioz asked how used oil would be collected, and suggested it not be done curbside, but rather at a central collection point. Mr. Hreha stated there is a lot of opposition to curbside oil recycling. He stated there is a plan to locate a permanent local facility to collection oil, car batteries, etc. Councilmember Lindemans asked that information be provided on how many trucks leave Temecula, how many loads are dumped and how much room is available at the current landfill. Minutes 12/11/90 13 Mayor Parks stated he has a problem with the RFP in that there is a requirement for a $500 application fee, and the proposals will not be publicly opened or read. He asked that this be made public record. City Manager Dixon stated this will be a public bid. City Manager Dixon stated the bid will be sent to all haulers who have done any hauling within the City of Temecula, or to anyone requesting a copy. He asked the members of the Council to review the proposal and make any recommendations desired, so a final document can be presented on January 8, 1991. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to continue this item to the meeting of January 8, 1991. The motion was carded by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Mayor Parks to extend the meeting to 11:45. The motion was unanimously carried. Bill Meacham reported that the San Diego Board of Supervisors has rejected the Blue Canyon Landfill, and they have not approved the EIR on the other two dumps, Aspen Road or Gregory Canyon. He stated it appears that these actions will extend the process another two years. He said that further exploration of the Eagle Mountain alternative, has been accelerated. 12. Rancho California Town Center Traffic Signalization City Manager Dixon reported that the City does not have anything firm on this item and it will be brought back on the agenda as soon as the report is received. He stated no formal action is required on this item. 13. Conqderation of F~ab![qhin~ New Position and Classification City Manager Dixon reported this item is to authorize the establishment of an Assistant City Manager/Director of Administrative Services Administration and to adopt an appropriate resolution modifying the personnel classification. He said the salary range has been modified and recruiting would be possible in this range. Minutes 12/11/90 14 Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos Court, asked why an Assistant City Manager is necessary, and stated he felt salaries are too high. Councilmember Birdsall stated she is in favor of establishing this position stating the managing of a City is too much for any one person to accomplish. City Manager Dixon explained the Assistant City Manager would handle the day-to-day administration, in terms of personnel, risk management, and general management. He stated this would give him time to bring together developmental services, work with industrial clients and work more closely with the City Council. Mayor Parks called a one minute break at 11:30 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 11:31 PM. 14. Update Report - Mello-Roos District CFD 88-1~ Tim Serlet, City Engineer, stated at the next meeting the agreement with J.F. Davidson for work on CFD 88-12, for the widening of Ynez Road, the additional on-ramps at Winchester and Rancho California Road and the Apricot Overcrossing will be on the next agenda. He said the second property owners meeting is scheduled for December 20, 1990, at 10:00 AM at City Hall and the environmental assessment work on Ynez Road is proceeding and plans should be submitted on January 4, 1990. He said the aerial mapping for all projects has been done, and it is anticipated that the project study reports for Caltrans will be completed by the end of January. Mayor Parks asked when bond sales are anticipated. Mr. Serlet answered the end of January or first part of February. 6. (Cont.) Tentative Tract Map No. :~6549 and Plot Plan No. 10864 Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineering, stated all parties (the City, the applicant and the adjacent property owners) have agreed to a set of conditions and signatures have been obtained. Mr. Stewart informed the Council that none of the conditions have substantially changed from what has been presented to the Council, including the planning and engineering conditions. He stated it is staff's intent to have these conditions typed and initialed, and recommended the Council adopt them. He explained two exhibits have been added to help clarify some of the conditions, numbered E and F. He stated the wording on the resolution should be changed to read Exhibits A - F. Minutes 12/11/90 15 It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve staff recommendations with the addition of conditions of approval and adding Exhibits E and F as follows: 6.1 6.2 6.3 Adopt a negative declaration and approve Tentative Tract Map No. 26549 and Plot Plan No. 10864. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 10864 TO CONSTRUCT A 260 UNIT TOWNHOUSE COMPLEX ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 22.22 ACRES LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 90-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 26549 TO SUBDIVIDE A 22.22 ACRE PARCEL INTO A 260 UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-290-011 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 C OUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks None None CITY MANAGER REPORTS City Manager Dixon recommended at the conclusion of the meeting of December 18, 1990, Council consider a date to adjourn to a special meeting at City Hall to review site plan and system furniture for the new City Hall facilities. He asked that the Council consider December 19, 20, or 21 to hold this meeting. Minutes 12/11/90 16 Mr. Dixon reported that on Saturday, December 8, 1990, staff interviewed General Plan Consultants. He said specific proposals will be requested and due in January so this consultant can be chosen quickly. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS None given. CITY COUNCH, REPORTS Councilmember Mufioz requested that staff put together a resolution supporting a local f'tim festival. AD.IOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 11:45 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Ronald J. Parks, Mayor ATTEST: Greek, Deputy City Clerk Minutes 12/11/90 17