HomeMy WebLinkAbout06_005 PC Resolution
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING - TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
32468, TO CONSOLIDATE EIGHT LOTS TOTALING 35.31
ACRES INTO 1 PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET
WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-
080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-
0571 )
WHEREAS, Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. (UHS), filed Planning
Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to
PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463 Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with the
City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby
incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres
generally.located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 70 feet west of
Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and
959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project");
WHEREAS, the .project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Project on April 6, 2005, at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff anCl interested
persons had an' opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the
general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this
Project; and
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning
Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental
Impact Report for the Project; and
WHEREAS, a Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with
the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8,
2005; and
A:\Clty Council Agenda Managerl20061012406IReglonal Hospital OriginalIHospital Staff Aeport and AesoslPC Aeso TPM.DOC
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Project on November 16,
2005, and again on January 5, 2006 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify
either in support or opposition to this matter; and
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-01
recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project; and
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. That the above recitations are true and correct and are
hereby incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinas. That the Planning Commission, in recommending approval
of the Application, hereby recommends the following findings as required in Section
16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the
subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, Subdivision Ordinance, General
Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code because the proposed subdivision map is
consistent with the development standards within the Development Code, Subdivision
Ordinance and related General Plan Amendment;
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a
contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land
is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract;
C. The site is physically suitable for the uses and proposed density as shown on
the tentative map as proposed by the Applicant;
D. The design of the proposed subdivision and the proposed improvements, with
appropriate conditions of approval, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage
or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known
fish, wildlife or habitat on the Project site, and the Project will not affect any fish, wildlife or
habitat off-site. In addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and
certified prior to action on the Application;
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems;
A:\clty Council Agenda Managerl2006lO12406\Regional Hospital OrlginallHospltal Staff Aeport and AesoslPc Aeso TPM.DOc
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially
equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
H. The subdivision is a commercial/office Project and is not subject to Quimby
fees.
Section 3. Recommendation of AOl}roval.. Based upon the findings set forth
above, the Planning Commission of the City of T emecula hereby recommends that the CitY
Council approve the Project (Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468) to consolidate eight parcels
totaling 35.31 acres into one parcel subject to the Project specific conditions set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and
all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED
Commission this 5th day of January, 2006.
by the City of Temecula Planning
~.
eavid Mathewson, Chairman
ATTEST:
7}t;1hr~ f/f~~
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
A:\city Council Agenda Managerl2006lO12406IReglonal Hospital OriginallHospital Staff Aeport and AesoslPC Aeso TPM.DOC
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that PC Resolution No. 06-05 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of
January, 2006 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Mathewson,
Telesio
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
~ ~/-e-- ~ Jk-
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
A:\city Council Agenda Managerl2006lO12406IRegional Hospital OriglnallHospital Staff Aeport and AesoslPc Aeso TPM.DOc