HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-006 CC Resolution
I
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 06-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND
USE ELEMENT TO REMOVE EIGHT (8) SUBJECT
PARCELS FROM THE Z "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN"
OVERLAY DESIGNATION AND CORRESPONDING TWO
STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR A SITE ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH,
APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA
ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS.
959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007
THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462)
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECUlA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOllOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findinas. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc.(UHS), filed Planning
Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to
PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463 Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are
hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31
acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 70 feet
west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 959-080-001 through 959-
080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project").
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C. The Planning Commission considered the Project on April 6, 2005, at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition
to this matter.
D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general
public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this
Project.
E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning
Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental
Impact Report for the Project.
R:/Resos 2006lResos 06-06
I
I
I
F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8,
2005.
G. The Planning Commission considered the Project on November 16, 2005,
and again on January 5, 2006 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at
which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify
either in support or opposition to this matter; and
H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-001
recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-002, recommending approval of a General Plan
Amendment.
J. The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 24,
2006, to consider the proposed General Plan Amendment.
K. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due
consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-05,
entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR
THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING
THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR
THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY
700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD," AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NOS. 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-
010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )." The Final Environmental
Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program accurately addresses
the impacts associated with the adoption of this Resolution.
L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
R:/Resos 2006/Resos 06-06
2
I
I
I
Section 2. Findinas. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes
the following findings:
A. The amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the
adopted General Plan. The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the General
Plan encourage "a complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial,
public and open space land uses (Goal 1 )," "a City of diversified development character
where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban
development (Goal 2)," and "A City which is compatible and coordinated regional land
use patterns (Goal 8)." The Project provides a regional use that is needed in the
community and surrounding region. There is currently a lack of medical treatment
facilities in the community capable of providing adequate medical care for the general
population. The Project integrates public medical facilities necessary for the demand of
the current and future population. The Project is situated adjacent to residential uses
and a state highway. The Project has been designed to mitigate various potentially
significant impacts via an environmental assessment in which circulation, noise, light
and glare, biological and air quality has been reviewed the conditioned so the Project
can co-exist with the surrounding rural residential area. The Project is consistent with
the purpose and intent of the Professional Office (PO) designation, which allows low
and mid rise structures that provide uses such as community facilities. In addition, the
Project is consistent with the development standards of the Development Code and
associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking,
landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The site is therefore properly planned
and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use. The
Project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
B. The amendment will not have a significant impact on the character of the
surrounding area. The amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The Project
allowed by the amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and as designed and conditioned the proposed
conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures
because there was an initial study prepared, which identified potentially significant
environmental impacts and a mitigation monitoring program was adopted that mitigates
potentially significant impacts such as traffic, air quality, noise, light and glare, and
biological to a less than significant level. For example, access points have been
designed to reduce the amount of traffic leaving the Project site towards residential
areas by eliminating left turn options and focusing the primary access points along the
state highway. Additional landscaping and berming are included in the conditions of
approval to screen the height and reduce noise. The tallest buildings were relocated
closer to the state highway, away from the residential area to reduce the appearance of
the height; this will also reduce the noise from the emergency room area. Sound
blankets are required during initial grading and construction activities to mitigate
construction noise. There are conditions in place requiring helicopters arriving and
leaving the Project site to utilize commercial and the state highway corridor rather than
R:/Resos 2006/Resos 06-06
3
I
I
I
residential areas. Emergency vehicles are required to turn off sirens no less than Yo
mile from the Project site. The Project is a conditionally permitted use as has been
designed and conditioned (including mitigation measures) in manner that will reduce
any potentially significant impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The building and
the site are designed to respect the surrounding area and uses and therefore will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
C. The nature of the Project allowed by the amendment is not detrimental to
the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The Project is a 320-bed
hospital and a helipad. The nature of this use, as conditioned, is not detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the community because the Project is providing a
service that is needed in the community and region and it has been designed to
minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the
surrounding community. The Project will actually contribute to the long term viability
and longevity of the community by providing additional medical care facilities. In
addition, prior to the issuance of any building permit, the California Office of Statewide
Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) as well as the City of Temecula Building
Department and Fire Department will review the construction plans for compliance with
the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code.
D. The heliport is consistent with the requirements described in subsection 2
and 3 of Section 17.10.020.P City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed
helipad facility is consistent with the requirements described in Section 17.10.020.P of
the City of Temecula Development Code, including setbacks from parks, school and
residentially zoned parcels.
Section 3. Amendments to the General Plan Text. The City Council hereby
amends the Land Use Element of the General Plan to remove eight subject parcels
from the Z "Future Specific Plan" overlay designation and corresponding two-story
height restriction for a site located on the north side Highway 79 South, approximately
700 feet west of Margarita Road, generally known as Assessor Parcel Numbers 959-
080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (Amending
Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A,
Existing General Plan; Exhibit B Proposed General Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.)
Section 4. Severabilitv. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions
of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
R:/Resos 2006lResos 06-06
4
I
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 24th day of January, 2006.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Ron Roberts, Mayor
I
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. 06-06 was duly and regularly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 24th day of January,
2006, by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 1 COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS:
I
R:/Resos 2006/Resos 06-06
Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar,
Washington
None
Roberts
~
Susan Jones, MMC
City Clerk
5
I
I
EXHIBIT A
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 06-06
(EXISTING GENERAL PLAN)
I
,~i~~~'~:;
.,J:"-'i..-"I,.\,
, "'-'-.
I
L
A
N
D
u
S
E
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN
Approved Specific Plans
SP- 1 RoripaughHills
SP. 2 Rancho Highlands
SP. 3 Margarita Village
SPA 4 PalomalPaseo Del Sol
5P. 5 ad Town
SP. 6 Campos Verdes
SP. 7 TemeaJla Regional Conler
SPA 8 WeslllldeNUragas at Old Town
SP- 9 Redhawk
SP-10 Vall Ranch
SP-11 Roripaugh Ranch
SP-12 Wolf Creek
5P-13 HaNestOll
PD04 TemeoJla Creek Village
PDO-5 Ranmo Pueblo
#106 DutchViUage
#184 Rancho BelJaVlsla
#213 Wilchesl8r PltlperlieslSrtverhav.1l
fl265 BorelAirpark
# 284 Qulnta Do Lago
#286 W.,chesler 1800
#238 Crown VallayVBlage
#313 Morgan HiD
Future Speclflc Plans
Y Speclic Plan Area Y
Z Specllc Plan Area Z
"
~
..
'fo
~
/
/ Figure LU-4
Specific Plan Areas
.~,.,,,,..
o\J';fl.O~~~'
_ .o~J>ofl."'
/
.'
"
/
...-.......
_. _ TemecuJa City Boundary
_ _ _ _ I Sphere of Influence Boundary
_ Planning /Vea
Swrce: TemllCUl. GIS and Cotton'Brk:lIlll"Assodatel
W+EO
250
C I T Y
() F
500
I Feet //
.-",
eMAU"'DARo--~-----""'-
------ \:;
.--_.e.
/
,/"
CE?.JER....l.. I'LAN
TEI\iIECLlLA
C ENE R. A L
f' LAN
LlI-28
I
I
EXHIBIT B
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 06-06
(PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN)
I
..>~'.',
j';~:~'.::)
,,%y'0,~
Xf{f2~~
I
L
A
N
D
u
S
E
I
I
/ Figure LU-4
Specific Plan Areas
CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN
Approved Specific Plans
5P- 1 Roripaugh HiUs
5P. 2 Rancho Highlands
SP. 3 Margarita Village
5P- 4 PalomalPaseo Del Sol
5P- 5 ()d Town
5P- 6 Campos Verdes
Sp. 7 Temecula Regional Center
SP- 6 WestsideNUlages at Old Town
SP- 9 Redhawk
SP-10 Vall Ranch
SP-11 Roripaugh Ranch
SP-12 Wolf Creek
SP-13 Harveston
POO4 TemeaJla Creek Village
POO-S Rancho Pueblo
#106 DutchVlDage
#164 Rancho Bella Vista
#213 Wi'lchester PlOpertieslSJlverhav.il
#265 Borel Airpark
# 264 Quints 00 Lage
#286 Wi'lcheslor1800
#238 ClOwnVaUeyVurage
#313 MorganH1U
Future Specific Plans
y Specilic PlanA~a Y
Z Specific Pliln Area Z
~
~
\
~
,,'
r"....
,..o~~$_..
~O&'~
.-c~.
-.-.\
\
\
--
~
\
o
\ .\
I " _..",
,,,~S"'H-1'MNE.5 ---
.-_...---.~.
_ . _ Temecula City Boundary
_ _ _ _I Sphere of Influence Boundary
_ PlaminglVe8
SaJr~;TemacuIIGIS.ndCouo~8rldlllllIAuocllltul
,
........,,~
\
W+EO
.-.-'
\;OMA.-l1ND~RO
250
500
I Feet
/,/"
,"
\
\1
/",'
c
T Y
.~
l,
F
T
F M
E C
LI
L i\
c-
."
E N
E R
!\
L
r
LA
N
LlI-28