The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About041906 PC Agenda II Iln compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE April 19, 2006 - 6:00 P.M. ..****** Next in Order: Resolution No. 06-031 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Roll Call: Chairman Guerriero Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Director's Hearina Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March, 2006 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Presentation of Preliminarv Plans for the Civic Center - Garv Thornhill. Deputv Citv Manaaer R:\PlANCOMMlAgendas\2006\04-19-06.doc PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. New Items 3 Plannina Application No. PA05-0314 a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessitv Findinas. submitted bv Matthew Faaan. to allow the sale of beer. wine. and distilled spirits. located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. Harmonv Linton. Assistant Planner. 4 Plannina Application No. PA06-0011. a Minor Conditional Use Permit. submitted bv Michael Brewer. to allow for the sale of beer. wine. and distilled spirits. located at 41789 Nicole Lane. Stuart Fisk. Associate Planner. 5 Plannina Application No. PA05-0004. a Tentative Parcel Map. submitted bv Scott Cooper. RBF Consultina. to subdivide 17.99 acres 121.22 aross) into six commercial lots. located on the east side of Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Solana Wav. Matthew Peters. Associate Planner. 6 Plannina Application No. PA04-0596. an Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. to amend mixed-use proiect reauirements. preserve existina allevs. add allev auidelines. modifv sian reaulations and historic preservation provisions. aenerallv located in and around Old Town. Dale West. Associate Planner. 7 Plannina Application No. PA05-0390. a Maior Modification. submitted bv Grea Iscas of Sian Methods Inc.. to an approved Comqrehensive Sian Proaram for the Etco Plaza Buildinas. located at 27270 throuah 27290 Madison Avenue. Christine Damko. Associate Planner. 8 Planninp Application No. PA05-0294. a Comprehensive Sian Proaram. submitted bv Vail Properties Butterfield Staae LLC. to construct a 73.306 sauare foot shoppinp center that includes five retail buildinas. located on Hiphwav 79 South between Mahlon Vail and Butterfield Staae Road. Emerv Papp. Senior Planner. 9 Plannina Application No. PA06-0018 and PA06-0019. a Maior Modification to a Development Plan includina the architectural elevations for multi-familv residential buildinas and retail/office buildinas. submitted bv MDMG. Inc. to reqlace two speculative buildina pads with a retail store totalina 17.500 sauare feet. modification of the recreation center. modification of the residential roof plans and a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru pharmacv. located on Rancho California Road aporoximatelv 300 feet east from Moraaa Road. Emerv Papp. Senior Planner. R:\PlANCOMMlAgendas\2006\04-19-06.doc 2 10 Plannina Application No. PA05-0167. a Development Plan. submitted bv Pulte Home Corooration. for a 21 acre multi-familv housina development consistina of 71 buildinas with a total of 213 individuallv owned attached triplex units. located near the westerlv end of Temecula. Emerv Papp. Senior Planner. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJC)I)RNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\PlANCOMMlAgendas\2006\04-19-06.doc 3 ITEM #1 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning April 19, 2006 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for March 2006. Date March 2, 2006 March 9, 2006 March 30, 2006 Attachment: Case No. PA05-0362 PA05-0358 PA05-0330 Proposal An industrial condominium map to subdivide two industrial buildings and one office building totaling 116,506 square feet, located at the northwest corner of Remington Avenue and Diaz Road A proposed condominium map (TPM 33923) to establish 20 office condominiums, currently in construction, on 4.72 acres, located on the west side of Business Park Drive between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road Establish industrial condominium units on a 1.6 acre lot for the proposed parcel map resulting in five condominium units in an existing building, located at 41636 Enterprise Circle North 1 . Action Agendas - Blue Page 2 R:\DIRHEARIMEM0\2006\04-19-2006.doc Applicant David Krzywicki Southern California Investors David Krzywicki Southern California Investors Ryan Waufle, Masson and Associates Action APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED K\DIRHEARIMEM0I2006\04.19-2006.doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 ACTION AGENDA 2 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING March 2, 2006 1 :30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. /I you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item NO.1 Project Information Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: 1 :30 PM PA05-0362 Tentative Parcel Map Legacy Corporate Center David Krzywicki, Southern California Investors An industrial condominium map to subdivide two industrial buildings and one office building totaling 116,506 square feet. Northwest corner of Remington Avenue and Diaz Road Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations Veronica McCoy APPROVED R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2006\03-02~06 Action Agenda.doc ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING March 9, 2006 1 :30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: 1 :30 p.m. PA05-0358 Tentative Parcel Map Temecula Office Center David Krzywicki, Southern California Investors A proposed condominium map (TPM 33923) to establish 20 office condominiums, currently in construction, on 4.72 acres West side of Business Park Drive between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho California Road Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per CEQA Section 15315, Minor Land Division Harmony Linton APPROVED R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2006\03-09-06 Action Agenda.doc ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING March 30, 2006 1 :30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 Project Information Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: 1 :30 p.m. PA05-0330 Tentative Parcel Map Condo Conversion Gupta Industrial Condo Conversion Ryan Waufle, Masson and Associates To establish industrial condominium units on a 1.6 acre lot for the proposed parcel map resulting in five condominium units in an existing building. 41636 Enterprise Circle North Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations Veronica McCoy APPROVED R:\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2006\03-30-06 Action Agenda.doc ITEM #2 l :I-' fr. = i. II PRESENTATION OF PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE CIVIC CENTER PRESENTED BY Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager :t, r- ITEM #3 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 19, 2006 Harmony Linton TITLE: Assistant Planner Planning Application PA05-0314, A Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Findings to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 21 license, off-sale general) to be located within Rite Aide, a 16,836 square foot commercial building to be located on the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road in the Rancho Temecula Town Center ~ Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial ~ Categorically Exempt (Section) 15301 (Class) o Notice of Determination o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan (Section) DEIR G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0314 Rite.Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Matthew Faqan, Matthew Faqan Consuitinq Date of Completion: October 25, 2005 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Specific Plan 1 (SP-1) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Commercial North: South: East: West: Low Medium Residential/Santa Gertrudis Creek AM/PM Gas Station/Retail/Davcare Parkinq/Self-Storaqe Facilitv/Residential Senior Housing/School Lot Area: 1.12 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A Parking Required/Provided: N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. The proposed project is a request to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 21 license, off- sale general) within Rite Aid, a 16,836 square foot commercial building to be built in the Rancho Temecula Town Center. This center was approved by the City Council on November 23, 2004 with a Conditional Use Permit that allowed a total of four drive-thru facilities to be established within the Development Plan. Per condition number eight of those Conditions of Approval, if future tenants request the sales of alcohol, a separate Conditional Use Permit shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Commission. The California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) considers the Census Tract in which the project site is located to be "over-concentrated" in off-sale licenses. For this reason, Public Convenience or Necessity findings will be required. The applicant is requesting the Planning Commission make a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize the retail sales of beer, wine, and distilled spirits at 39782 Winchester Road within the Rancho Temecula Town Center. The use matrix within the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan reverts back to the City of Temecula Development Code. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 2 ANAL YSIS Rite Aid is a retail pharmacy that also carries general merchandise along with pre-packaged foods and drinks, and one-hour photo service. They are proposing to sell alcohol as an additional convenience to the public by facilitating a one-stop shopping experience. The hours of operation stated within their Statement of Operations are 8:00 a.m. to 11 :00 p.m. seven days a week. The Statement of Operations has been attached. Staff has verified through the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control that the project site is within Census Tract 0432.03. Currently a total of 11 Type 21 (off-sale general) licenses are authorized in said Tract and 8 are allowed before the Census Tract is considered over- concentrated by ABC. Because ABC has determined this Census Tract to be over- concentrated with off-sale licenses, Public Convenience or Necessity Findings are required. The proposed project is a request to sell beer, wine, and distilled spirits in a retail setting. This specific use requires a Type 21 license for off-sale general from Alcohol Beverage Control, and a prior approved Conditional Use Permit requires that future tenants obtain a conditional use permit prior to the sale of alcohol. The Development Code also states that any business selling beer or wine shall be no closer than 500 feet from any public park, religious institution or school. The GIS department has provided the necessary maps and staff has verified that the proposed use is not closer than 500 feet from any religious institution, school, or public park based on the measurement criteria within Section 17.10.020 of the Development Code. The nearest such use is Chaparral High School which is located approximately 700 feet southwest of the project across Winchester Road. The Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has provided Conditions of Approval. The proposed project is consistent with Section 17.10 of the Development Code, and the Planning Commission has developed several criteria to determine whether or not a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity can be made. A new criteria was adopted by the City Council on May 24, 2005, and the approval authority shall consider only the following when making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity: 1 . Whether or not the proposed project is consistent with the general plan and development code. 2. Whether or not the proposed use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of adjacent land uses. 3. Whether or not the proposed use will have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses. 4. Whether or not the proposed use will result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. Staff feels that the findings for a Minor Conditional Use Permit can be made and that criteria has been rnet to make the Findings for Public Convenience or Necessity. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15301, existing facilities, no expansion of facilities) CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan. Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the findings for a Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity findings. In addition, staff recommends the Planning Commission determine that the project is exempt from review under CEQA Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301, Existing Facilities. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Specific Plan-1), as well as, the standards within the Development Code. The project exceeds the minimum separation requirement of 500 feet from a religious institution, school, or public park. 2. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community and allow the business to be competitive with other businesses selling beer, wine, and distilled spirits in the vicinity of the project. 3. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to Ihe health, safety and general welfare to the community because the project will provide an additional convenience and service to the community. The site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation 01 sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued Conditions of Approval. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 4 Criteria to iustifv makino a findino of Public Convenience or Necessitv: 1. Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan and the Deveiopment Code? Yes. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Specific Plan-1), as well as, the standards within the Development Code. The project exceeds the separation requirement of 500 feet from a religious institution, school, or public park. 2. Is the proposed use compatible with the nature, condition, and character of adjacent land uses? Yes. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses because the Development Code requires this type of use to be placed away from residences, schools, parks, and religious institutions. 3. Will the proposed use have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses? No. The site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation of any sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued Conditions 01 Approval. The closest land uses which could be considered sensitive is Chaparral High School to the southwest across Winchester Road and a daycare facility to the southeast across Nicolas Road both are over 500 feet from the proposed project. 4. Would the proposed use result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity? No. Per information obtained from Alcohol Beverage Control, there are currently a total 01 11 Type 21 licenses authorized within Census Tract 0432.03 and a total of 8 are allowed before being considered over-concentrated by ABC. However, no off-sale licenses are currently active within this tract and one license is pending. Based on the information provided, staff feels that that we are able to make a finding based on convenience. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution No. 2006-_ - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 4. Statement of Operations - Blue Page 9 5. Statement of Justification - Blue Page 10 6. Common ABC License Types - Blue Page 11 G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-Q314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 6 ", " "" '''-/'''-'' " '", / >"" ", <' ~ '", J---'\/\ '_ .--\~,(>~/, ,/ '>, " ~?>~ ~d~\ ~/' /\..C / "::._...------.-0, \ \ '~, 0 =r7" /\ lS'.r IF___,- /;8"l ' / / ,", 1.~~-Jj:!}I~~~:;?>, i"..)!:.::J / :'\, ~:::; . . 0)...~" ',-~ !'--._,- / /. / ',~/ r~ ~f////'^" / /' /1.......... < / / ) all ... '" ,,/ // .: /1/. " :,~-<, //)', <'$l~.t\ '( / ,.../,0. ''\ /''-", ""Gt- " / /' \ 1y~(J ",,/ / (,------ "I I I '.( j ,/ "/c, , "/'(J)~ / ~" >-~~?>/ .,y;;?\ ~ ----- //\ \ -i", /" \ ') )\ '\ \ / / \ \ '-" ~z ", ", " .. '. -', " ......... /~ . ) " ,/ ./ ~ /' / "., / " ;/ & I I I i I ! I .'----------. ..... I ''.., ! ! ~ ~----...... \,,,"--/', 'r- ~ _i--------"i L \, \ , ----I 'I ~----i 1..'/ ,^,'~ ,- ,: C"l " ---;; '~'<. / \ '(, "'~--J~I I~'! - ~/ ""- .. I j// // ;^, "( .I' t~,I:;" I~_. ,I ,r---------:...\/ ',y /.' """', '~,/., "?~_____.i : 1"-___ , " , ." IYI I ___,--~__.' L. _____ ~.: " (' ---," .... '> (, ''-.;fJ /- . .. ' -1. ........ ' ,/ , .I '" +1-0" / '-, '__, I,' :' _?___/ / '- <'(1\'- /; ~-.. I , . ",v // /',/'>-;00,( /,r,,-.!..' -_../ 1_1/ . " . ,/ ~/ <:", / " - ""'---.L I "'./ / /,,0..,., . . / RA,/fV8o""--< " < '/ / )," .I / >! ~c ',: ,~' / / / <.., / / ,I i-"""r----..!:fl:f!Ir"""< ' /' ,/' """, 'I / h, o~ / / , I , I', " " <" I' / / /", ../,' ~ /~~--l '/" , \.,., , -- <%l ( '. / ^ ' '<" / -' / >-.. :::.:t I-..... '"'' / /' . v'<~./..// ~Ioil-;J /'v:</ ' L---.;:rJ I ',',< I I I l ' I / " '; 1 I, ,I , 1 _.....__ ",,) SHA.OOW~ --<"....' ...----~ I~h- v r / J'. 0~) ..' r '_".' I / /c_.. . ' ,/il ' , ....- j "-//../ >,~ I , ./,. " : ;s:., ,/ /' /'..... I "; / " ; " " " I I / , /', I I I / L I \ '. \ \ \\ \ \ ' \ \! I I ---............ I \ i '~-.l_--../ WINCHESTER RD ----------. ------- \ ,/ ----------_.-------------~ , I --! C j /' . (T-L__~/. L i --I /...... / \, ~ ------------..I ---------- / ""-----J ~ \ " I \ / I~~ I, I ~ I / r----____ \ \ ( I/J I! I __.....\ \ i~~__~ '{J 1]'\'/\7 I .. ----------!-------r /' i I I I ' I , .-I , ..' ~ / r-~~, I / ~~ I ~------ > I ; ". ~',<' " "" " is I) f3~ r-i j& .'-'--.. i / \ JUNECT_;E / (-/II ,/ ," I 'I ~ '. , . -- ----------- ----- ;' r--------...>__> / I ;' () '<'~" / ;-----1 Rf .. " , It 'I(f) I ,', u \~N'j-' ',--i~ \ ,I '\ 1~"~ \. / ~ '-( ,')..' \ ,;.. --i/~- Sle:t:r;;.....,~_ ,'" ,?>,c, ~ \ I / ',_. 4,y ~......... ,,/ / "", ,'--?J~ ,/ \ I,' 1'- "'ID"i'S'o' ,.i /.'....... i,/.: Ll" ", " '1...... ';",0"" /\ (--'; /;.,/ ~; /-..................-.....~<' \ '" "'--/:' <. I " ...................../ /~__./ "/~" .:, I ,1..-............... " I ;' "-...... '-j ........ - - ..., ..:-..........--. ~" ----.....:::----- -r " ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP. PCNIPlanninglPC StaN Report.doc 7 I ~.;~ '-"'00:"1-11' ~o::., lH.) <;I.I....~Il'.n"" rrl( I-..-h....--~- ~~~ _, I...... "/'-1 I....... ,..~~.... j"",...c "UN ...~ ".;:.n:.] l~' '.O\lt ....~ w.....l ....~. ..' ::..,J '-U. ...,~ ,..- WJI-, II.......'.. "':'~"J '-U', Jo.;~W[.1 .".. . ....",,,,, 1-- ".- "1'-' ,,~ ...' 1,."1 .-.... i".;:;.... 1'''/ --I ....... I"".;~." I.... ..- ........1',..":..... ~:: I[ :: I ::: :tl --tr".. jltW' 1- J J .... ,we",n ..., '_If'"" ru.., "'''".lD{~ ..r" /- ,/!,C......... j[ FAR.: ~ J!i,?:'" II :":W;,H Ii L;T COVERAGE: Ii '~",,": ."... II 0( O>C>J'.;;...."..,II t:; "'" " F'.It., j ~ . ~::..::~::..~,~~.. ,".0' fJmt flr......, '.i__Wt: ~ ~ ftK."-O'gu.C1,t.IO. v.... '....5(.."", .I~ ;:;p1':') _ VICINITY MAP: ~ '..:d:~ ..:~''""' ,,~:~ .-"c-----r ,?,'" ~,< l{~' ;j ~ i ~ ',..W\' o < o a: <Il < -' o (.) :z *~?'.~ ,.C.,ATHOf mWL '" '\"0"" ----,o.w"~E.NTIOHINO:- ~(!lENIO~HOlJSll'lO) 0}~i;~4" , F.H./ o. -F.H. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER, '1.-I"-(ltI-t,1 STREET ADDRESS: ~[e -,,"lllCI """w...... ""'0\.1.$ '0>0 (1)1,,",,,, lo~n.o\............l) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: ~"'~~."".,...........cr""'"'OIl''''' I "'1'>OO~l.l"'fIl_'o""""'''''''''I''''''"Y['1 .'.......mln..._.......",..,l<.,CIJU .~..'::..:..,m<""..."O:OVW!Y ,,""".'1.'''1< LEGAL: .lo;.",m.,," ZONING: f!!:',_.....,,,,,,,,.,,,"",,..\ GENERAL PlAN DESIGNATION: !:i.'........-....."""..' EXlSTlNG I PFl.OPOSED LAND USE: ~..... .._.n I __, <,.,n \ AOJACEN1' PROPERTY ZONING: llI'"",""_J,"",.1o.U<T.<<<",,","W,('UIVI<1 / TOTAL GROSS I NET SITE AREA: ~t.t .e.oUI,",I)O 1/,) BUILOING INFO: I~ I~' !"OlOl[ I''''' 1.>01 11"'_ II}I_I '.~ \ ,1':<'0,.. r."",l.l. Yl::: g. - "~,':;~'~ 1~:1. / i;k '\! ilL >f" ~:,. ..... , . o _. "I,."~lll'''''f .~ 1- ...--...... lC..tw..<,1:ol ..,,"'''' L'.l'i...:l\.(~" 1[l ~~ III I i 'll ll~. III ~ ., i "'ll'" :;~~I:~~,~ -- ........,-......"'.....c 1"'."'."" J<:ll""'O""I.'OIll I........'" ......"'"""',,,..,.,, "'" -~ ."."..'" ,,.,........,.VOJJI1' ,,.un...........""'Yl~,U.'" DRAWING INDEX ...,. -.........."""" ...""............... .....^-.....-. ..................... ...1."-......-. ..." .-........... ..,..........-. ,".,,"--.-. '1..._....._' .....-.....- .....-......... '".lII:_""._ .....-......-. ~_......., ." .....-.-,.-'. .... ......-._,....... ~._...-.... .,U ......-.._....,,~, .... .....-.-. DETAILED P ,I..RKINCi SUMMARY """",,,,~(>QT"'~ !!'!:!!'" ... ...\ :::;; :.~':,:'::~''''' "'- .-0' "..."."..,-- ,.... :2::: :;:;~ ~~:: :: ;:-~, :::':"::~.-...... ,~_. ....".."" ."" _. .....v._Jl... --, _" ~- S ; @~ ~ '0100'1' ,_otOUfl.!O; '" ~:':-::i.,"'- ---..... "......"...".. "......".,._... ,~~." ~'"':'.:,:'.... ,y H R.ANCHO TEMECULA TOVIN CENTER ....C'M'lO'I"l.fIWf.'..-:ou's.' Tl"'!C......~_ f'LAtlNING SUBMITTAl ~..cWIC ~M,eoo,,!Nf'Mrn!~' SIHPI..).N -- ,.._" -:""'''...",..... AD,l f=::- ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP. PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF' THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 05-0314, A REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY FINDINGS TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF BEER, WINE, AND DISTILLED SPIRITS (TYPE 21 LICENSE, OFF-SALE GENERAL) FROM AN APPROVED 16,836 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 39782 WINCHESTER ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 920-100-013 Section 1. Matthew Fagan, representing Matthew Fagan Consulting filed Planning Application No. PA05-0314 on October 25, 2006, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0314 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA05-0314 on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA05-0314 subject to the conditions of approval after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA05-0314 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 5. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 6. Findin(ls. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA05-0314 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: Conditional Use Permit ICode Section 17.040.01 OE) A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Specific Plan-1), as well as, the standards within the Development Code. The project exceeds the minimum separation requirement of 500 feet from a religious institution, school, or public park. B. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's,doc 1 The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community and allow the business to be competitive with other businesses selling beer, wine, and distilled spirits in the vicinity of the project. C. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare to the community because the project will provide an additional convenience and service to the community. The site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation of sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued conditions of approval. Criteria to iustifv makina a findina of Public Convenience or Necessitv: A. Code? Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan and the Development Yes. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan (Community Commercial) and Zoning (Specific Plan-1), as well as, the standards within the Development Code. The project exceeds the separation requirement of 500 feet from a religious institution, school, or public park. B. Is the proposed use compatible with the nature, condition, and character of adjacent land uses? Yes. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses because the Development Code requires this type of use to be placed away from residences, schools, parks, and religious institutions. C. Will the proposed use have an adverse effect on adjacent land uses? No, The site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation of any sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued conditions of approval. The closest land use which could be considered sensitive is Chaparral High School located southeast on Winchester Road, over fOOO feet from the proposed project. D. Would the proposed use result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity? No. Per information obtained from Alcohol Beverage Control, there are currently a total of 11 Type 21 licenses authorized within Census Tract 0432.03 and a total of 8 are allowed before being considered over-concentrated by ABC. However, no off-sale licenses are currently active within this tract and one license is pending. Based on the information provided, staff feels that that we are able to make a finding based on convenience. G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, rCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 2 Section 7. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA05-0314 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities, Class 1). The proposed project will not add square footage to an existing commercial building, located at 39782 Winchester Road (APN: 920-100-013). Section 8. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (type 21 license, off-sale general) to be located in a 16,836 square foot commercial building, attached hereto on Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on this 19th day of April 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was dUly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2005\PAOS...Q314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planlling\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 3 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA05-0314 Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Findings to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 21 license, off-sale general) from an approved 16,836 square foot commercial building to be located at 39782 Winchester Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 920-100-013 MSHCP CATEGORY: N/A DIF CATEGORY: N/A TUMF CATEGORY: N/A Approval Date: Expiration Date: April 19, 2006 April 19, 2008 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\PlaniliDg\2005\PA05~0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 6 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 3. The applicant shall comply with the statement of operations for PA05-0314 on file with the Planning Division, unless superceded by these Conditions of Approval. 4. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 5. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 6. Within two years of approval of this permit, commencement of the use shall have occurred or the approval shall be subject to expiration. 7. If commencement of the use has not occurred within two years of approval of this permit, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only. 8. The City, and its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this conditional use permit (including the conditions of approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to the modification of the business, a change in scope, emphasis, size or nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any conditional use permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council is in addition to, and not lieu of, the right of the City, its Director of Planning, Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any conditional use permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such conditional use permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. 9. Prior to the commencement of any alcohol sales, the applicant shall submit verification the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has issued the necessary Type 21 license (off-sale general). G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 7 10. The applicant shall comply with all underlying conditions set pertaining to PA02-0364, PA02-0365, and PA04-0540. 11 . All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Police Department 12. Applicant has applied for a Type 21 (Off Sale General) (Package Store) through the Riverside District Office 01 Alcoholic Beverage Control. Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are allowed on the premises. 13. Applicant will comply with City Ordinance 97-07, (9.14.010 Temecula Municipal Code series). 14. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: a. A valid California Driver's License b. A valid California Identification Card c. A valid Military Identification Card (Active/Reserve/RetirediDependent) d. A valid Driver's License from any of the Fifty States or Territories of the United States e. A valid U.S. Passport f. A valid governrnent issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency 15. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a federal, state, county or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with the below requirements (25660 Business and Profession Code). a. Name of person b. Date of birth c. Physical description d. Photograph e. Currently valid (not expired) 16. Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages is trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees working at Beverages and More. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (951) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training must be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training when new employees/ management are hired. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 8 17. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should be placed in a well- lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones instalied within the interior of the building. 18. Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (by the drink or by the package) between 2:00a.m. and 6:00a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00a.m. and 6:00a.m. (Section 25631 B&P). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00a.m. and 6:00a.m. of the same day (Section 25632 B&P). 19. Authority of Peace Officers/Refusing Inspection: Police officers, sheriffs' deputies, and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at any time during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer. (Sections. 25616, 25753, and 25755 B&P; 148 and 241(b) PC) 20. The following requirements apply to stores (license Type 20 and 21): a. Post "No Loitering" signs upon written notice from the ABC b. Post "No Open Container" signs upon written notice from the ABC c. No alcohol consumption inside a store or outside a bar or tavern d. Illuminate the exterior of the premises, including adjacent public sidewalks and parking lots under the licensee's control, during all hours of darkness when open for business e. Remove litter daily from the premises, adjacent sidewalks and parking lots under licensee's control and sweep/clean these areas weekly f. Remove graffiti from premises and parking lot g. Have no more than 33% of windows covered with advertising or signs h. Have incoming calls blocked at pay phones upon request of local law enforcement or ABC; (see item 6 above) i. Have a copy of the operating standards available during normal business hours for viewing by the general public (Section 25612.5 (c) B&P) G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 9 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc 10 21. The applicant shall comply with the Department of Environmental Health letter dated November 29, 2005. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCN\Planning\Draft PC Reso and COA's.doc II DC. JNTY OF RIVERSIDE . HEAL _-I SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAl. HEALTH November 29, 2005 W~[E illl [E 0 ill [E ~ I lji ~ DEe 0 1 Z005 ~ City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Hannony Bales By_ RE: Development Plan No. PA05-3l4 Dear Ms. Bales: 1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Minor Conditional Use Permit to sell alcohol within a 16,836 square foot retail facility to be located within the Rancho Temecula Town Center and we have no objections. 2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the app,vp,;ate water and sewering districts. b) Ifthere are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fIxture schedule, a fInish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specifIc reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (951) 600-6330. Sincerely, ~artinez,'s~p~sin (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Bnilding Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. vironmental Health Specialist Loedl Enforcement Ageucy . PO Box 1280 Riverside, CA 92S02-12XO . (909) 955 8982' FAX (909) 781,9653 . 4080 Lemor. Street. 9th FlouL Riverside. CA 92501 Land Use and V,h:l.ter Engineerin3 . PO. Sox 120(; Riverside. CA 925U2-1206 . (Y09) 955 8980. FAX (909) 955-890:i . 40DU Lemon Sh"cet. 2rid Flool, RivE'ISid:.-, CA Q2SOl ATTACHMENT NO.4 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-0314 Rite.Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 9 IUJJ3I ~ RITE AID Corporation . MAILING ADDRESS P.O. Box 3165 Harrisburg, PA 17105 . GENERAL OFFICE 30 Hunter Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 . (717) 761-2633 Public Necessity & Convenience Application Proposed Rite Aid #6438 Rancho Ternecula Town Center 39782 Winchester Road T ernecula CA STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Hours of Ooeration - Our proposed hours of operation will be 8:00 AM - 11 :00 PM seven days a week. Number of Emolovees - We intend to ern ploy approximately 20 full or part-time employees at the store. Number of Reauired Parkina - 729 parking spaces are required. 976 will be provided. Averaae Dailv Peak Trips Generated - Anticipated to be approxirnately 700. Tvoe of Eauiornent or Processes I)secj - We intend to use the following equipment: Cash registers, electronic scanners, personal computers, filrn processing equipment, coolers, freezers, and an automatic pill counting machine. We will also use a film development process. Descriotion of Hazardous Materials - Retail sales of general household cleaning products and health and beauty aids including aerosol products, flamrnable and combustible liquids, and toxic solids and liquids. Other Descriotions That Effectivelv Describe Proposed Use - Operation of a retail pharmacy that will maximize convenience to local shoppers by facilitating a 'one-stop' shopping experience. Accordingly, in addition to a broad array of household goods and health and beauty aids in our general merchandise sections, we intend to operate the following departments: . Pharmacy . Pre-Packaged Food & Drink . One Hour Photo . Alcoholic Beverages Securitv Plan - Store associates will supervise the store during business hours and the store will be locked and an electronic alarm will be armed whenever the building is closed. Approximate Percentaae of Products Devoted to Alcohol - We are seeking a Type 21 Off-Sale General Liquor License. We expect alcohol to comprise 4-9% of total sales at the location. . ATTACHMENT NO.5 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-Q314 Rite.Aid CUP. PCNIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 10 Public Necessity & Convenience Application .- '.... ~S; (rr~ !~-.. ~rt;:,~ /7..., '-',. (j if/) ~ " w if2:,......... " !'t.R, - ~1IJ~ : ~j:c>.,. '; '/ l{J!JR 131 i 'Qf) .'-. <,! dhr; ........ 'gD~"'-,. -.Oqrt;:--",- .?e'~1 "'-... i""/ I r'd tI // !-f Proposed Rite Aid #6438 Rancho Temecula Town Center 39782 Winchester Road Temecula CA STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION 1. Does the proposed establishment have any unique features, which are not found in other similar uses in the community? Yes. Thrifty Payless Inc strives to create a unique shopping experience maximizing customer service through store construction, product composition and placement, and associate training programs. 2. Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population li.e. patrons of a different socio- economic class)? No. Thrifty Payless Inc serves the general public. 3. Would the proposed mode of operation of the proposed establishment ILe. sales in coni unction aasoline sales.. tours. etc\ be uniaue or differ from that of other establishments in the area? Yes. Thrifty Payless routinely offers health education and assessment activities to customers and local residents, including diabetes detection and prevention, and flu shot clinics. 4. Are there anv aeoaraphical boundaries Ii.e. rivers. hillsides) or traffic barriers Ifreewavs. maior roads. maior intersections) seoaratina the oroposed establishment from other establishments. Yes, the Rancho Temecula Town Center will be bordered by Winchester, Harrison and Nicholas Roads. 5. Is the proposed establishment located in an area where there is a sianificant influx of population durina. seasonal oeriods? No. 6. Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within the Census Tract of the proposed establishment? Unknown, awaiting data from the CA Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 7. Are there anv sensitive uses ILe. schools. oarks. hosoitals, churches). in close proximity to the proposed establishment? No. There will not be any sensitive uses are located within 500 feet of the proposed store. 8. Would the proposed establishment interfere with these sensitive uses? No. Our processes and procedures will minimize the problems of loitering and littering and prevent sales to minors. 9. Would the proposed establishment interfere with the auiet eniovment of their orooertv bv the residents of the area? No. The provision of adequate parking, distance from residences and use of an automatic, self-closing door all help ensure quiet enjoyment of nearby properties. 10. Will the orooosed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area? No. Thrifty Payless associate training and register technology combine to prevent sales to underage customers. The training our associates receive also prevents sales to visibly intoxicated persons. Additionally, Thrifty Payless Inc accepts by condition that Beer, malt beverages, and wine coolers in containers of 16 oz. or less cannot be sold by single containers, but must be sold in manufacturer pre-packaged multi-unit quantities ATTACHMENT NO.6 COMMON ABC LICENSE TYPES G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-0314 Rite-Aid CUP, PCNIPlanninglPC Sta" Report.doc 11 Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control COMMON ABC LICENSE TYPES AND THEIR BASIC PRIVILEGES State of CalifornIa GRAY DAVIS, Governor Business, Transportation and Housing Agency MARIA CONTRERAS-SWEET, Secrelary LICENSE TYPE 01 02 20 21 23 40 41 42 47 48 49 ABC-GIG (1/02) DESCRIPTION BEER MANUFACTURER - (Large Brewery) Authorizes the sale of beer to any person holding a license authorizing the sale of beer, and to consumers for consumption on or off the manufacturer's licensed premises. Without any additional licenses, may sell beer and wine, regardless of source, to consumers for consumption at a bona fide public eating place on the manufacturer's licensed premises or at a bona fide eating ptace contiguous to the manufacturer's licensed premises. May conduct beer tastings under specified conditions {Section 23357.3\. Minors are allowed on the premises. WINEGROWER. (Winery) Authorizes the sale of wine and brandy to any person holding a license authorizing the sale of wine and brandy. and to consumers for consumption off the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of all wines and brandies, regardless of source, to consumers for consumption on the premises in a bona fide eating place that is located on the licensed premises or on premises owned by the licensee that are contiguous to the licensed premises and operated by and for the licensee. May possess wine and brandy for use in the preparation of food and beverage to be consumed at the bona fide eating place. May conduct winetastings under prescribed conditions (Section 23356.1; Rule 53). Minors are allowed On the oremises. OFF SALE BEER & WINE . (Package Store) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the oremises where sold. Minors are allowed on the oremises. OFF SALE GENERAL. IPackage Store) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumotion off the oremises where sollh Minors are allowed on t'1e cremises. SMALL BEER MANUFACTURER ~ (Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) Authorizes the same privileges and restrictions as a Type 0 I. A brewpub is typically a very small brewery with a restaurant. A micro- brewery is a small-scale brewery operation that typically is dedicated solely to the production of spedalty beers. although some do have a restaurant or Dub on their manufacturinl? Dlant. ON SALE BEER. (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer for consumption on or off the premises where sold. No wine or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Full meals are not required; however, sandwiches or snacks must be available. Minors are allowed on the memises. ON SALE BEER & WINE - EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on Or off the premises where sold. Distilled spirits may not be on the premises (except brandy, rom, or liqueurs for use solely for cooking purposes). Must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Must make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are ooen. Minors are allowed on the orernises. ON SALE BEER & WINE - PUBLIC PREMISES. (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. No distilled spirits may be on the premises. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5 for exception, musicians). Food service is not reouiw.n ON SALE GENERAL - EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the licensed premises. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licensed premises. Must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Must make actual and substantial sales of meals. during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Nomal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are ooen. Minors are al10wed on the oremises. ON SALE GENERAL - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Night Club) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5 for exceution. musicians), Food service is not reouired. -- -- ON SALE GENERAL - SEASONAL. Authorizes the same privileges and restrictions as provided for a Type 47 license except it is issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the license certjficate. <v+,~~~:w,,<:,~ {L'"",,,~ ",,<":;,:: ~ 00ftOl"l,4.o LICENSE TYPE 51 52 57 59 60 61 67 70 75 80 ABC-616 (1/02) DE S CRIPTlO N CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for consumption on the premises where sold. No off-sale privileges. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the orenUses. VETERAN'S CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits. to members and guests only, for consumption on the premises where sold. No off-sale privileges. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the oremises. SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL - Generally issued to certain organilations who cannot qualify for club licenses. Authorizes the sale of beer. wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for consumption on the premises where sold. No off-sale privileges. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the Dremises. ON SALE BEER AND WINE - SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges as a Type 41. Issued for a soecific season. II1c1usivc dates of ooeration are listed on the license certificate. ON SALE BEER - SEASONAL - Authorizes the sale of beer only for consumption on or off the premises where sold. Issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the license certificate=-~in~ _or disfilled ~f'jrits may not be o~ the oremises. Minors are allowed on the oremises. ON SALE BEER - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer only for consumption on or off the license<l premises. Wine or distilled spirits may not be on the premises. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (wamin2: si(!J)s reouired)' Food service is not reouired. -- -- BED AND BREAKFAST INN . i\!1thorizes the sale of wine purchased from a licensed winegrower or wine wholesaler onty to registered guests of the estabtishment for consumption on the premises. No beer or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Wine shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the wine shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation. Removal of wine from the Imlunds is not oennitled. Minors are allowed on the Dremises. ON SALE GENERAL - RESTRICfIVE SERVICE - Authorizes the sale or furnishing of beer. wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises to the establishment's overnight transient occupancy guests or their invitees. This license is nonnally issued to "suite-type" hotels and motels, which exercise the license privileges for guests' "complimentary" happy hour. Minors are allowed on the oremises. ON SALE GENERAL - BREWPUB. (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on a bona fide eating place plus a limited amount of brewing of beer. Also authorizes the sale of beer and wine only tor consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are allowed on the oremises. BED AND BREAKFAST INN - GENERAL - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits purchased from a licensed wholesaler or winegrower only to registered guests of the establishment for consumption on the premises. Alcoholic beverages shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the alcoholic beverage shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation. Removal of alcoholic beverages from lhe grounds is not vennitted. Minors are allowed on the memises. 5;;<e;tEO(JP. r1i~...,.. ".....>;,0 ... "."". "'t. fL", D~ "1- k,:,::;": g "t'<0; ." ~ oItOL"'t<."" ITEM #4 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: April 19, 2005 Prepared by: Stuart Fisk Title: Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning Application No. PA)6-0011 a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 47 On-Sale General - Eating Place) an approved restaurant located at 41789 Nicole Lane, generally located on the west side of Nicole Lane, approximately 400 feet south of Overland Drive (A.P.N. 921-810-025) RECOMMENDATION: [8] Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial CECA: o Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) [8] Subsequent Negative Declaration (Section) 15162 o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan OEIR G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFFREPORTdoc I PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Alcoholic Beveraqe Consultinq Service; Michael Brewer Date of Completion: January 17, 2006 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Community Commercial (CC) North: South: East: West: Vacant (Future Restaurants) Guidant Parkinq Lot Vacant (Future Retail/Restaurant) Retail Lot Area: 6.27 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: 4,026 square feet/N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A Parking Required/Provided: N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project is a request to sell beer, wine and distilled spirits (Type 47 On-Sale General - Eating Place) from an approved restaurant (Frankie's Steak & Seafood) in the Community Commercial zone. The project site is located at 41789 Nicole Lane, generally located on the west side of Nicole Lane, approximately 400 feet south of Overland Drive. Section 17.08.030 of the Development Code requires that a restaurant serving distilled spirits must obtain a conditional use permit from the Planning Commission. G.\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Sleak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT doc 2 The Statement of Operations submitted with this application states that "guests can choose between sitting on the patio, or we also have traditional table seating". The site plan for this center was not approved with outdoor dining for this suite. Staff has requested and anticipates that a minor modification application will be submitted in the future to address outdoor dining. The project has been conditioned that alcohol cannot be sold or consumed from an outdoor dining area until a Minor Modification to the Development Plan for an outdoor dining area has been submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Director of Planning. Staff has verified through the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control that the project site is within Census Tract 0432.16. A total of fifty-four (54) on-sale licenses currently exist in the tract and six are allowed before it is considered "over-concentrated". Although the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) considers this Census Tract to be over- concentrated, ABC does not require that the Planning Commission make Public Convenience or Necessity Findings for restaurants. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designation (Community Commercial), as well as the standards within the Development Code. The project is not less than 500 feet from a religious institution, school or a public park. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community, and will allow the business at the project site to be competitive with other similar restaurants selling beer, wine, and distilled spirits in the vicinity of the project site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The City Council adopted a Negative Declaration in association with the land use designation and zoning amendment from Business Park (BP) to Community Commercial (CC) in 2003. Based on the project description and associated additional information, staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the previously adopted Negative Declaration. Therefore, consistent with Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that no subsequent environmental review is required for the project. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit with the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010.E) 1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the site's General Plan and zoning (Community Commercial), as well as the standards within the Development Code. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc 3 2. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community, and will allow the business at the project site to be competitive with other similar restaurants selling beer, wine, and distilled spirits in the vicinity of the project site. 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. An existing building at the site adequately provides all improvements including walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and all other features as required in the Development Code and by Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. 4. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare to the community because the project will provide an additional convenience to the community, and the site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation of sensitive uses. /n addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued Conditions for Approval. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The project has been reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes and ordinance before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 5 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6 3. PC Resolution No. 06-_ - Blue Page 7 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 4. Statement of Operations - Blue Page 8 G:\Planlling\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:\P!anning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT.doc 5 VICINITY MAP PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak and Seafood \?i51 'Uy -jJ~1 ~J ~~ I Project Site I ----- /' / ~ 820 ~"'" \ 1,640 /~o0 ;.oet' / \ 410 ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\ST AFF REPORT.doc 6 fROfECT REPRfSfNTArMs . , SITE PLAN GENERAt NOTES -- - :::....~'r"__ =::."-" ="--.. =...----........ =?:..::..:J::_ -.,.. '::'~-'" ~ ~~~~~f;' -------...- : ~~ :.:~~:~~ r-: .. ~._---_......_._-- ~ ==::.::.."=""~..:~.....--- ... ::lIl=r.ll~------ .. --..---- 1;'.A~...-....... .E::"~ - ..--......... ~r-"'"'- -- --- =...~~- _..~.....- -- SfTF PIAN WNl?TfS 0----- <D~~-- (!)f~A1JllCl'..ftlZ,......, Iil:==...-:::.---- Gj:=----=-..:.;.----- ffi:"---' :::f!iF'''"-=- 3---- ,~o:.."::::::- -- =.:....- -- --- ---.- =-~...::-_..- ........ PROjEa DATA ..--...- -- ~.==~z:~~=::;.%'":. -- C-=-==:..:"",=::: - -- -.....--- -...." !it""-1.-,::-.c:.- _ ~-_._- @===- (" .- ~ :;:::;"....::.::"'..L...._..... :::-.z.':"'"~_.. -------- ::!: -- 0_- <-",'" ~ :::::-~.:...., . -..- ___.....--... ... Cl =.;. =:~~.:-- a~... ::;-"'-;;:"___"O~O;J -...- ..- -.- ..- -..- ...- , , I" !.""""""'<" -. ,!,-qr-jiIY~ \'" 1t~.i~;I~~\~1' '.,:, - ~~ . '".,...... .. . ,~. ,::<,- ~ ~ .- ,., ~";~ "..,":,<,J>~..' \. ~ ~.:~ "'~~~~'''l" _'.;~?;~'::~,:,.'" ..j>Jr' ~i'.v 1'::"1 ~ \ \" , ,""" '"I, ~~ \.", ,,\:-,,'. '!, ~ --_._~;;.., ~ =-~=.=-..:..~'";- .--.--- ~~ ~_ I ~...~' () IS' fJ(J' 60'.. SITE PLAN -r- mil" . ~- -';:'-J!_:::;- "~~:~.- '-.,~- -//--/ ~~;:O:D lIO'fIlw.u: FA 04 0525 ........,..- _.- ..= ~ ~AllclineAtthl:<<ls ,,,,,,,....,,.,,.,,..., """""'"'''''''''' ,,,,.,,,.,,,,,,,,.,,,.,,,, ~~fII/.<lI'I'I.ICN(f. - ....._JIl. ~~- ~.~-:r_1ILII ,46ReI!()IIt'eI"AACf\.o ........ ....., :::: a:i <:), U..::, cs~i..: -! .. SQ . ttJ eJ ...----. f' SITE PLAN A1.1 .t<:"~k1EJS. .oPT: 13 ~/l-(j' If /1t/()15 ~ NJ ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT. doc 7 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0011, A REQUEST FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE OF BEER, WINE, AND DISTILLED SPIRITS (TYPE 47 ON-SALE GENERAL - EATING ESTABLISHMENT) FROM AN APPROVED RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 41789 NICOLE LANE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NICOLE LANE, APPROXIMATELY 400 FEET SOUTH OF OVERLAND DRIVE Section 1. Michael Brewer, representing Alcoholic Beverage Consulting Service, filed Planning Application No. PA06-0011 on January 17, 2006, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. Planning Application No. PA06-0011 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA06-0011 on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0011 subject to the conditions of approval after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA06-0011 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 5. by reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA06-0011 (Minor Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.04.010.E of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designation (Community Commercial), as well as the standards within the Development Code. B. The proposed minor conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed minor conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed project is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because the proposed project will provide additional convenience for the community, and will allow the business at the project site G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood Minor CUP\Planning\Draft PC Reso - MCUP.doc I to be competitive with other similar restaurants selling beer, wine, and distilled spirits in Ihe vicinity of the project site. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. An existing building at the site adequately provides all improvements including yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and all other features as required in the Development Code and by Planning Commission in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed minor conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The nature of the proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare to the community because the project will provide an additional convenience to the community, and the site is consistent with the City policies regarding separation of sensitive uses. In addition, the City Police Department has reviewed the proposed project and has issued Conditions for Approval. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The project has been reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be Categorically Exempt from further environmental review (Class 1, Section 15301, existing facilities, no expansion of facilities). Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Planning Application No. PA06-0011, a request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 47 On-Sale General - Eating Establishment) from an existing building located at 41789 Nicole Lane, generally located on the west side of Nicole Lane, approximately 400 feet south of Overland Drive, subject to the conditions of approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-001 I Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft PC Reso - MCUP.doc 2 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on this 191h day of April, 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 191h day of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft PC Reso - MCUP.doc J EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft PC Reso - MCUP.doc 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA06-0011 Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits (Type 47 On-Sale General - Eating Establishment) from an approved restaurant located at 41789 Nicole Lane, generally located on the west side of Nicole Lane, approximately 400 feet south of Overland Drive Assessor's Parcel No.: 921-810-025 MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 19, 2006 Expiration Date: April 19, 2008 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). G;\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Sleak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft COA. MCUP.doc 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft COA - MCUP,doc 2 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed copy to the Planning Department for their files. 3. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 4. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 5. Within two years of approval of this permit, commencement of the use shall have occurred or the approval shall be subject to expiration. 6. If commencement of the use has not occurred within two years of approval of this permit, the permittee may, prior to the expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to three one-year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only. 7. The City, and its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this conditional use permit (including the conditions of approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to the modification of the business, a change in scope, emphasis, size or nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any conditional use permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its planning director, planning commission, and City council is in addition to, and not lieu of, the right of the City, its director of planning, planning commission, and City council to review and revoke or modify any conditional use permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such conditional use permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. 8. Prior to an employee selling alcohol from this facility, the alcohol licensee or employer for the facility shall ensure that the employee has received Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (L.E.AD.) training from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafooct - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft COA - MCUP.doc 3 9. An 8.5" x 11" (or larger) sign listing local transportation service providers and corresponding telephone numbers shall be posted at a conspicuous location within the building. Information to assist in the compilation of this sign may be obtained through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (telephone number (951 )-676-5090). 10. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 11. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. 12. No alcohol shall be sold or consumed from an outdoor dining area until a Minor Modification to the Development Plan for an outdoor dining area has been submitted, reviewed, and approved by the Director of Planning. 13. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Police Department 14. The Applicant has applied for a Type 47 (On Sale General- Eating Place) through the Riverside District Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control. A Type 47 license authorizes the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for consumption on the licensed premises and authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licensed premises. The business associated with the licensed premises must operate and maintain as a bona fide eating place. The business must make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., 11 :00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. Minors are allowed on the premises. 15. Applicant will also comply with City Ordinance 97-07, (Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010; Consumption of alcoholic beverages in public prohibited). 16. Identification for alcohol sales will be verified utilizing one of the following: a. A valid California Driver's License b. A valid California Identification Card c. A valid Military Identification Card (Active/Reserve/RetiredlDependent) d. A valid Driver's License from any of the Fifty States or Territories of the United States e. A valid U.S. Passport f. A valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft COA - MCUP.doc 4 17. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with the below requirements (25660 Business and Profession Code). a. Name of person b. Date of birth c. Physical description d. Photograph e. Currently valid (not expired) 18. The Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages is trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employers and employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. Contact the Temecula Police Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (951) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training must be completed prior to the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training when new employees/ management are hired. 19. Prior to the sale of alcohol from this facility, the applicant shall schedule an Alcohol Planning Review Board meeting with members of the Temecula Police Department and a member of the City Planning Department. 20. Miscellaneous: a. After Hours: Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (by the drink or by the package) between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. (Section 25631 B&P code). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day (even if someone bought the drinks before 2:00 a.m.) (Section 25632 B&P). Some ABC licenses have special conditions (restrictions) as to hours of sale that are stricter than the law. Those licenses are marked "Conditional" (23805 B&P). b. Authority of Peace Officers/Refusing Inspection: Police officers, sheriffs' deputies, and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at any time during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace office (Sections 25616,25753, and 25755 B&P; 148 and 241 (b) PC). G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Drafr COA - MCUP.doc 5 c. Disorderly House: Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disorderly house is a licensed outlet (on or off-sale) that (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc., and/or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution, narcotics, etc. The licensed premises include the parking lot (Section 25601 B&P; 316 PC). By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steak&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\Draft COA - MCUP.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.4 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0011 Frankie's Steaic&Seafood - Minor CUP\Planning\STAFF REPORT-doc 8 STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Frankie's Steak and Seafood would like to obtain a Conditional Use Permit to obtain a liquor license. We would like to provide more of a choice to our customers with distilled spirits. Frankie's Steak and Seafood is a high service full restaurant. Our guests can choose between sitting on the patio, or we also have traditional table seating for those who prefer a more intimate meal. We do not want to make our restaurant into a bar. Frankie's Steak and Seafood will not have signs visible on the outside, which advertise the availability of alcohol. We just want to be able to provide more varieties to our clients. We are open seven days a week. We are open from 4:00 P.M. to 12:00 A.M. We have about 20 employees. We will not make any big changes to our floor plan. Location in the Creekside Center, the restaurant has adequate parking. All parking is available on site. ITEM #5 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 19, 2006 Matthew D. Peters, AICP TITLE: Associate Planner Planning Application No. PA05-0004 a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 32924) and associated Mitigated Negative Declaration to subdivide 21.22 gross acres into six commercial lots located on the east side of Ynez Road approximately 2,000 feet north of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road, across from the Temecula Auto Mall (APN 921-300-013) I:8J Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial D Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) D Notice of Determination D Negative Declaration I:8J Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan (Section) DEIR G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT. doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Mr. Scott Cooper, RBF Consultinq Date of Completion: January 6, 2005 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial Zoning Designation: Community Commercial Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Commercial Hiqh Density Residential (Somerset Apartments) Commercial I"Target" Shoppinq Center) Auto Mall Expansion Lot Area: 17.99 Net Acres, 21.22 Gross Acres Net Lot Sizes: Parcel One: Parcel Two: Parcel Three: Parcel Four: Parcel Five: Parcel Six 2.81 Acres 2.71 Acres 2.58 Acres 2.16 Acres 3.46 Acres 1.59 Acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: NA Landscape Area/Coverage: NA Parking Required/Provided: NA BACKGROUND SUMMARY The proposed project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 32924) to create six commercial lots. The minimum lot size is 1.59 acres and an average lot size of 3.0 acres is proposed. An open space easement is proposed along the north side of Parcels 1, 2 and 3 of the subject property. This area is defined by the California Department of Fish and Game jurisdictional water along this unnamed tributary to Empire Creek. The project includes a single access point (Rancho Way) from Ynez Road. Rancho Way will terminate in a temporary cul-de-sac approximately 25 feet from the eastern property line. Parcels 1, 5, and 6 will take direct access from Rancho Way. Parcels 2 and 3 will share access from Rancho Way and Parcel 4 will take access from a north-south private street that is proposed to connect Rancho Way to the existing Temecula Town Center. Staff identified potentially significant environmental impacts to Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise. As a result, staff prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the subject property to reduce all potential impacts below a level of significance. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Environmental Issues As part of the project analysis, staff determined the project was not Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act. Staff was concerned with potential impacts to the existing drainage along the northern property boundary, the fault located on the project site, city-wide non-attainment basin for air quality, and noise impacts resulting from construction activities. An Initial Study was prepared to provide further analysis of these issues and resulted in the preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration with mitigation measures required to reduce impacts for air quality, geology/soils, cultural resources, and noise. These mitigation measures are sumrnarized in the Environmental Deterrnination section and included as attachment No.6. Tentative Parcel MaD The map will create six commercial lots on 17.99 net acres. The lot sizes will range from 1.59 to 3.46 acres, which complies with the minimum lot size requirement of the Community Commercial (CC) zoning district. The topography of the site rises from the west to east approximately 20 feet. The project includes a single access point (Rancho Way) from Ynez Road. Rancho Way is identified as a secondary arterial, 88' right of way. in the City of Temecula General Plan. Rancho Way will terminate in a temporary cul-de-sac approximately 25 feet from the eastern property line; however, additional right of way will be dedicated to the eastern property line to facilitate the eventual extension and construction of Rancho Way. Parcels 1, 5, and 6 will take direct access from Rancho Way. Parcels 2 and 3 will share access from Rancho Way and Parcel 4 will take access from a north-south street that is proposed to connect Rancho Way to the existing Temecula Town Center, commonly referred to as the "Targef' Shopping Center. According to a wetlands delineation study completed by the Thomas Leslie Corporation, 0.06 acres of wetlands and approximately 1.4 acres of riparian Willow-Mulefat habitat are located along the northern portion of the site adjacent to parcels 1. 2, and 3. This area will be protected via an open space easement, and is not proposed to be graded or affected by this project. An Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone is located on the site, and the fault line is located on the western portion of Parcel 6. As required, a 50-foot building setback has been identified on both sides of the fault line. While the fault and setbacks limit the buildable area of the lot, there is an adequate amount of usable pad area to support commercial development of this lot. As conditioned, the proposed map conforms to all applicable City Code requirements in terms of subdivision design, lot size, access, density and improvement. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed parcel map. G:IPlanning\200SIPAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR . PC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. An Initial Study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval. IMPACT MITIGATION Air Quality Comply with AQMD regulations, employ adequate watering techniques, ali earthmoving equipment shall use aqueous diesel fuel, and suspend grading operations when on-site wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. Cultural Resources Require an on-site Paleontological monitor to be present during grading activities. Geology and Soils County Geologist to review 40-scale plans and confirm location of fault line, comply with recommendations set forth in geotechnical and soils reports, and require planting of all slopes Noise All construction equipment will be equipped with properly operating muffling devices, Schedule construction to avoid operating multiple pieces of equipment simultaneously, avoid unnecessary idling for long periods, no loudspeakers, two way radios or music shall be audible to noise sensitive land uses, and grading and construction equipment to be stored on site. Based on the above mitigation, staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, and the project has been conditioned to ensure that ali required public and private improvements are constructed and maintained. Staff recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of PA05-0004 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 FINDINGS 1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The six-lot subdivision of a 21.22 gross acre site will result in a density of .28 units per acre and is within the allowable density range of .25 to 1.0 units per acre specified in the General Plan land use element for the Community Commercial designation. 2. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never entered into any Williamson Act contracts. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The Initia/ Study and special reports prepared for the application indicate that the project will not have any significant impacts to the environment. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the recommendations of the biological, cultural resource, fault hazard, and geotechnical reports have been incorporated as Conditions of Approval. 5. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, because the proposed development has been reviewed and will be inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to occupancy. 6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. During review of the design of the development, staff will ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. The construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conffict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, because the City staff have reviewed the latest title report and all required easements and dedications will be required as Conditions of Approval. 8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby), because the Temecula Community Services District has reviewed the project and found the subdivision of commercial property to be exempt from payment of Quimby fees_ ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 2. Plan Reductions (TPM 32924) - Blue Page 3. Plan Reductions (Conceptual Landscape Plan) - Blue Page 4. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Initial Study - Blue Page 6. Mitigation Monitoring Plan - Blue Page G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINTY MAP G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 \ -"'-..~ " J r -', , ..;( ..... ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTION (TPM 32924) G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 '" 'r f~ Q!l~tifT_TTES ....."". ."."'0.'. .... 'Ice. ". '~1 O.Y """-W'<'l,...'..,lC.' ~x_.....on"""O"'8E"""Q(_yt"'f'1.-OlX:fV,!" c:aou<IlT._'''''.....,.,-O<CO......,...,..OHO'l.>O,.... ELllOl.ZJlI;l: r-_ """"'<*",Ll:l"ro:U -('t-. ;1 ~~~: j ",,::(1' Ar~ V :If-U; ~ I,: ~ : l~ ;_;~~ .~ '1-1 ~ .(;~ g'" I I'{-'\' j 1 ~~Y"'_:\\\ ,',/iF ;1.1 I,.J i i;:if' I~ +11,. ),((:,1 f! [.+~ /1""1' ;,\,,'0' it ~., '.~ I ""~ ---"[".j /"'~ ' . !. _'I f I /' f,,,,,,fT,,.TIlPrY:FUPI-/'(' ...-_SCLTr... "'MThflRO>.O.SlJm<oo m<w..L'."""" (r"I"'_OO<2 .MC.,""l< PL~r-.NING APPLICATION NO. PAO~-OOO~ """"'" T_",,_" n- \.un. l-lIl _.. O]S>. ,.am. r,,""'>.E"lI:.""""TYf: '"1'(.U(Ctl""~rROl<1I1"'n_"OJO<IC...,".."""_,O "ICC$H~TH(."ONIWICtOC..."_""".o'o'>€I'fJtIt5tCfl"" Of ~_ 0....1""'.. AI" "'..,. "",<>, 0.' "'e" ..,on< ...-..:. """"T01lt:"~''''I...<t><>:>I.''rOOl(.'''7T...''.......E PFlr....R(tI~n<r r"'~~i~ CL.s_1_~O"':- ., D"[~ ~ ~, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENT A TI VE PARCEL MAP NO 32924 ~ V1r'IN'T'I'Y Iill J~ ........ ~ llJ:rr~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8,>~.;;:~~:;~ ~,"-G ..~"... JlJf\IE2005 """"'"""" @ ...........-.,,'",,".,-,-.........,'>><. ..........................'''''-..-.- "'""..11.'..'.."...,...."",,,...,,,...._.,,,,... ...-<0."..."..........." ,_...."...., ~,:1:J':;:,:,:;:..~:=:;."'1 ='i"=.i.,=':;:~'.\'t.."\:=.':.~,.,,: ~=~..~T~"l"~~~t;:):~1:?'''=l;.' ~,':"~=-'r:''":-.~''J:~::'.~~:;'''"", .......,,,..._,.........~_.....,,,...u".O",."T Q...:.~t.~ :r.:"'..'::,':...-.:';':"W:;,.~' .......,....."'...-.....""...."""...," ~<O~,'r~':."l~......f'C.l~~~:'i.". ."'"",",....",.."".._""" """'-""" 1 ......"........."........._.''''._ _..... ~ f1... .-,... "... '.-..- __ """" =~~~;;:j:'l.:'::=i.'..::,~ " ,.-.""'-,....,...,--............ ....-',..............."_....."'",,.... __.....,,,""-,"""'.........'........."0 ',...._,..1I........".'"""....~..",,"'" "c.ow.u""_,,_.,,,.,,<u.o... "NI.................,.."'. ...."",""""'".,,,,,, i':..~..:':J..:~~."'<I''".....'''...,........-- _.""""...01.''''1''..'''......''''''''.... TO """""""~'"'''''....'''''..,''"...t,,''' ",'-'''_I'JTWLI_''H~'''''''',''''''''- ._,,~, """" co, _...............,,_ ..,,""""" "" _"....,,"~,.,..o '".........,"""""'""'-.<.,. >>...._"...........0.""...."......."""..,,-"', ~~:;~=,"_,.. ~C--:=,::-'~'''''''''''.. ..........."""'''''''''-.._'''''''':.'i:'I;~~.:".,\ -....."."..''''..''-..-..''''......".''''''....'''''.. ,,""OJ""""'''''' ..,'",,,,,,,,,"-....-,, ... .<..._"~ "-'"" ......., e..."..." "",.. ",-""",<_"''''0' """"" '""n.u'"-c<'T",,,,~_,,,,.,et -,.....""...................,.""'",., ...."""'....,,'-.""'" ",.,,,,,,,,, ,""ID'''''''' ", "". """'<"<M'''''''''''"'',......" =,:':~:": .;.'~;, """~, W!' ,OC"':".'.l'''J''''j ...,,,,,""',"''"''',.....,..,,'''...,,,,,,_.. """"_"','''''-",''1:,'''''''''''''''''''''~''' ""',,",c>l"""" -- SELBY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..,...,'.........."',"'" .'''....,....'''..'''' ,.,.j',"""" I I TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 32924 SHEET 10F 1 SHEET "LA"''''''''' . "'ES,,,.. . ",,,"'''TRU,,T,''.. ~ CDN5UL.TING 275~~ YNEZ ROAD, surre 400 TEMECVlA. CALIFORNI~ a2591.4679 90~6'UO'2' FUij09~767240. """'.AeF_cOm ATTACHMENT NO.3 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 9 I I PUNa<<) LEilEl'IP 0.. ~~::.:::n~~.~= ~_ ><u~a.'..<<-~. .... -~ "......- ~'" at:~~ . .. ~~~....~''''''''''..c....,__,.,''''' .,' ~'t'.."""""''''.' . ,........_.........__...-...,..,_."'wO: =~.k.: l.&',t.ir.'"l?..."'l..". a '-'_'_'__' I1iiI .......r....... .. fM,t3/" ~ -,--. o'~~ . ~~"S'}:..... ~ ~-- -.....,-....",....,......-''''''''''....- \ i.~~=~~~ .~ I '.'~~' ~,/y..//_~....Sfo .~ '\ ..~ \/TrJt,JI'l'Y uo\E \~~~ ~~. ~ ,/ ~ S!;~ ~G - .",,};:: ;:~~:p .-::;-:"-~ -' :.. /, :j .J~ 1.1 ~.~ .~ L_ ~ J .~~ <- tv; .., 100 ''lO ~ ~-= ~ SELBY DEVELOPMENT CORPORA TTON Landscape Concept Plan Tentative Parcel No 32924, T emecula, CA ......-- --- -- CClNauu-,,.1ll ___ ...__.__ NOVEMBER 8. 2005 ATTACHMENT NO.4 PC RESOLUTION 06- G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 10 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0004, (SELBY) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 32924 AND ASSOCIATED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION TO SUBDIVIDE 21.22 GROSS ACRES INTO SIX COMMERCIAL LOTS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD, ACROSS FROM THE TEMECULA AUTO MALL Section 1. On January 6, 2005, RBF Consulting, representing Selby Development Corporation, filed Planning Application No. PA05-0004, Tentative Parcel Map 32924 in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. Section 5. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 6. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 7. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 16.09.140 of the T emecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and the City of Temecula MuniCipal Code. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The six-lot subdivision of a 21.22 gross acre site wiff result in a density of .28 units per acre and is within the allowable density range of .25 to 1.0 units per acre specified in the General Plan land use element for the Community Commercial designation. B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural/and and has never entered into any Wiffiamson Act contracts. G:\Planning\2005\PA05~OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc I C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The Initial Study and special reports prepared for the application indicate that the project will not have any significant impacts to the environment. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the recommendations of the biological, cultural resource, fault hazard, and geotechnical reports have been incorporated as Conditions of Approval. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, because the proposed development has been reviewed and will be inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to occupancy. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natura/ heating or cooling opportunities. During review of the design of the development, staff will ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. The construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, because the City staff have reviewed the latest title report and all required easements and dedications will be required as Conditions of Approval. H. (Quimby). The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby), because the Temecula Community Services District has reviewed the project and found the subdivision of commercial property to be exempt from payment of Quimby fees. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc , Section 8. Environmental Comoliance. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 9. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Application PA05-0004, (Selby) Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 21.22 gross acres into 6 commercial lots, for all 01 the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 10. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 191h day of April 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 191h day of April 2006, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COAdoc 3 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2005\PA05~OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA05-0004 Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map 32924 to subdivide 21.22 gross acres into 6 commercial lots located on the east side of Ynez Road between Rancho California Road and Solana Way across from the Temecula Auto Mall DIF Category: Commercial TUMF Category: Retail Commercial MSHCP Category: N/A Assessor Parcel No.: 921-300-013 Approval Date: April 19, 2006 Expiration Date: April 19, 2008 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Fourteen Dollars ($1,314.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc , GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\200S\PAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Pianning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 6 Planning Department 3. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or prOCeedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 5. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a ohasino plan shall be subrnitted to and approved by the Planning Director. 6. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program. 7. A Homeowners Association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 8. Within six months of Final Map recordation, the landscaping of all slopes and the areas within the right of way of Ynez Road, Rancho Way, and along the private street that is proposed to connect Rancho Way to the existing Temecula Town Center shall be installed. Public Works Department 9. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 10. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 11. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 12. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COAdoc 7 13. Underground all utilities along property boundary less than 34kV per City of Temecula Ordinance No 04-02. Community Services Department 14. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of debris generated by this project. Only the City's franchisee is permitted to haul debris. 15. The developer shall contact the Maintenance Superintendent for a pre-design meeting to obtain TCSD design specifications for the landscaped median on Ynez Road. 16. Construction of the future TCSD landscape maintained landscaped median on Ynez Road shall commence pursuant to a pre-construction meeting with the developer and TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. Failure to comply with the TCSD review and inspection process may preclude acceptance of these areas into the TCSD maintenance programs. 17. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped median until such time as those responsibilities are accepted by the TCSD or other responsible party. 18. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 19. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Fire Prevention 20. All previous existing conditions for this project, Specific Plan, or Development Agreement will remain in full force and effect unless superseded by more stringent requirements here. 21. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 22. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure with 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III.A). 23. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 8 upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix 11I- B). 24. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet ( CFC sec 902 and Ord 99-14). G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA,doc 9 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL PARCEL MAP G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 10 Planning Department 25. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: i. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. ii. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. iii. This project is within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. c. A copy of the recorded Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's): i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. iii. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and it's residents. iv. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. v. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and facilities. vi. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. vii. The CC&R's shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. viii. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. ix. Every owner of a suite or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COAdoc II x. All open areas and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. xi. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by the CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 26. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. Public Works Department 27. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau e. Planning Department f. Riverside County Health Department g. Cable TV Franchise h. Temecula Community Services District i. Verizon j. Southern California Edison Company k. Southern California Gas Company I. Fish & Game m. Army Corps of Engineers 28. The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 12 a. Improve Ynez Road (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' RIW) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised landscaped median. b. Improve Rancho Way (Secondary Highway Standards - 88' RIW) to include dedication of full-width street right-of-way, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. 29. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street irnprovement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. 30. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 31. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Ynez Road on the Parcel Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. 32. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho Way on the Parcel Map with the exception of five openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. 33. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 34. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 35. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR ~ Draft Reso COA.doc 13 36. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. 37. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 38. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 39. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the Parcel Map or the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way. 40. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 41. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 42. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. " Community Services Department 43. The landscape construction drawings for the landscaped median on Ynez Road shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services. 44. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install the landscaped median on Ynez Road. G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 14 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR. Draft Reso COA.doc 15 Planning Department 45. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 46. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deerns reasonably necessary to allow th" City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 47. During excavation activities, a qualified paleontological monitor will be present and have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during grading activities. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding will be provided to collect; curate and report on these resources to ensure the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved. 48. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 49. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. 50. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 51. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 52. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 16 53. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. 54. The Riverside County Project Geologist should review the 40-scale grading plans for the project and the project geologist should be onsite during site grading to confirm the location and orientation of the onsite active faulting and evaluate the condition and distribution of the soil and rock material exposed in the cut and fills. 55. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 56. A Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved for the landscaping of all slopes, and the areas within the R-O-W of Ynez Road, Rancho Way, and along the private street that is proposed to connect Rancho Way to the existing Temecula Town Center. Public Works Department 57. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department 58. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 59. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 60. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 61. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 17 62. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post- construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction- phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 63. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 64. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 65. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 18 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS G:\Planning\2005\PA05-OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 19 Planning Department 66. The Conceptual Landscape Plan shall be modified to reflect the shared access opening between lots 2 and 3 of TPM 32924. 67. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A 3' clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department. Utilities shall be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light poles shall be located on the landscape plans and shall not conflict with trees. 68. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program. Public Works Department 69. Parcel Map 32924 shall be approved and recorded. 70. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 71. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 72. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 73. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Community Services Department 74. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Fire Prevention 75. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 20 presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COAdoc 21 PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS G:\Planning\2005\P A05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COAdoc 22 Planning Department 76. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Public Works Department 77. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 78. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 79. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 80. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Community Services Department 81. The landscaped median on Ynez Road shall be completed, including the maintenance period and accepted by TCSD. Fire Prevention 82. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4). Soecial Conditions 83. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 23 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Sdby SR - Draft Reso COA.doc 24 84. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District's transmittal letter dated March 23, 2005, a copy of which is attached. 85. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Ranch California Water District's transmittal letter dated January 21, 2005, a copy of which is attached. 86. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health's transmittal letter dated January 19, 2005, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Selby SR. Draft Reso COA.doc 25 WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer 1995 MARKET STREEI RlVERSIDE, CA 9250 I 951.955 1200 951.788.9965 FAX 51180.1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERV AnON DISTRICT MAR 2 5 2005 City ofT emecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: V~ \ ..nt-lb ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PA-tJs -0004- (TPJv\ :'2.'1 z'-t) The District does not nonnally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are nonnally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be consiaered a logical comPQl)ent or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the rroposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approva or endorsement of the proposed project With respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such Issue: No comment. ~ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional Interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and ins~on will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be reqUired. This project proposes channels, stonn drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be conSidered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted . Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership.ot sucn taclllues on wnnen request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District stanaards, and District plan check and inspection Will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. ..x.. This project is located within the limits of the District's ......"'f'\2-l1"f!' c.~~ - Tl!""IeoA~p,. .J"Ll-l''f Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopteo; appllcaole tees snoulo De palo oy casnoers check or money order only to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of building or grading pennits, whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate In effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recoraation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been grantea a pennit or IS shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergen<:y Management Agency (FEMAl mapped flood plain, then the City should require \fie applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other Infonnation reguired to meel FEMA requirements, and should further rEl{juire that ihe applicant obtain a Conditional letter of Map Revision (ClOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a letter of Map Revision (lOMR) prior fo occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish ana Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Qualily Certification may be requirea from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, ~~7 ARTURO DIAZ Senior Civil Engineer Date: <-q.~ ~ 3 - ?J.> c: Transportation and land Management Agency Attn: Greg Neal AI->.. @ Bancho Water Bu;trr.'JfDll"'ctors CsahR F. Ko Pro>sident Ben R. Drake Sr Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman Joh.n E. Hoagland Michael R. McMillan Officers' Brian J. Brady General Manager Phillip L. Forbes Director of Finance-Treasurer E.P. "Bob" Lemon~ Director ofEngineenng Perry R. Louck DirectorofPlanlling Jeff D. Armstrong Controller Linda M. Fregoso DistdctSecretary/Administutive Services Manager C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP GeneralCoull3cl ._-~-~~ ; January 21, 2005 JAN 2 7 2005 Dan Long, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY LOT NO. 12 OF TRACT MAP NO. 3334 APN 921-300-013; CITY PROJECT NO. PAOS-0004 [SELBY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION) Dear Mr. Long: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off- site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT .<:~;C'.P Development Engineering Manager 05\MM:.cO 16\FCF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Rancho California Water Distrid 4~135 Winchl'ster Road. Post Office Box 90lj . Temecula, California 92589-9017 . (951) 296-6900 . FAX (951) 2%.6860 o Cc _.HY OF RIVERSIDE · HEAL SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH January 19,2005 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 JAN 2 1 2005 ATIN: Dan Long RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32924 (6 LOTS) Dear Mr. Long: I. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map 32924 and recommends: a A water system shall be installed in accordance with plans and specifications as approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate; with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor's Office. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part I, Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Tentative Parcel Map 3924 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water services, storage, and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such "Tentative Parcel Map". This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it will supply water to such Parcel Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose. A responsible official of the water company shall sign this certification. The olans must be submitted to the .Countv Survevor's Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the reauest for the recordation of the final man. 2. It will be necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final map. Local Enforcement Agency' PO. Box 1280, River~ide, CA 925021280. (90g) 955-8982 . FAX (9091 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street. 9th FicO!. Rlvel':>ide, CA 92501 land Use and Water Engineering' PO Box 1206 RIverside. CA 92502-1206 . \9U9) 955-8980 . FAX (909) 95S-8lJ03 . 4080 Lemon Street 2nd Floor. Rlwr':>ide, CA 92501 ATTACHMENT NO.5 INITIAL STUDY G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR. PC STAFF REPORT.doc 11 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Project Title lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan DesiQnation ZoninQ Description of Project Environmental Checklist PA05-0004, Selby Parcel Map 32924 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Matthew D. Peters, Associate Planner (951) 694-6400 located on the east side of Ynez Road north of Ranch California Road (APN 921-300-013) Mr. Scott Cooper, RBF Consulting, 40810 County Center Drive, Suite 100, Temecula, CA 92591-6022 Community Commercial (CC) Community Commercial (CC) The proposed project consists of a Tentative Parcel Map (32924) to subdivide 17.99 acres (21.22 gross) into 6 commercial lots. The minimum lot size is 1.59 acres and an average lot size of 3.0 acres is proposed. An open space easement, as defined by the California Department of Fish and Game's jurisdiction along the unnamed tributary to Empire Creek is proposed along the north side of parcels 1, 2 and 3 of the subject property. The project includes a single access point (Rancho Way) from Ynez Road. Rancho Way is identified as a secondary arterial, 88' right of way, connecting Diaz Road to Margarita Road in the City of Temecula General Plan. Rancho Way will terminate in a temporary cul-de-sac approximately 25 feet from the eastern property line; however, right of way will be dedicated to the eastern property line to facilitate the eventual alignment and construction of Rancho Way. Parcels 1, 5, and 6 will take direct access from Rancho Way. Parcels 2 and 3 will share access from Rancho Way and Parcel 4 will take access from a north- south private street that is proposed to connect Rancho Way to the existing Temecula Town Center, commonly referred to as the "Target" Shopping Center. On July 5, 2005, the City of Temecula circulated a Mitigated Negative Declaration for a project on the subject property that involved the grading of an area about 5 acres in size along the future alignment of Rancho Way. The project involved the removal of approximately 140,000 cubic yards of material from the east side of Ynez Road and transporting the material across Ynez Road to the west side within the City's Auto Mall Expansion area to complete grading of the reconfigured parcels of Recorded Parcel Map 23496. According to a biological resource and wetlands delineation study completed by the Thomas Leslie Corporation, the areas where grading activities have and are proposed to occur consist primarily of non-native grasslands and ruderal vegetation. No sensitive wildlife species, including the California Gnatcatcher, Quino Checkers pot Butterfly and Burrowing Owl will be impacted by the development of this project. The wetland delineation study identified a small amount of wetlands (.06 acres) and approximately 1.4 acres of riparian Willow-Mulefat habitat alonQ the northern portion of the site. G:IPlanningI2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial StUdy - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 1 Surrounding land Uses and Setting However, this area will be protected via an open space easement, and is not proposed to be qraded or affected by this proiect. North: Commercial East: High Density Residential (Apartments) South: Commercial ("Target" Shopping Center) West: Auto Mall Expansion I Other public agencies whose approval is required None G:\Planning\2005\PA05.0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\lnitial Study. TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the fOllowing pages. Aesthetics Agriculture Resources X Air Quality Biological Resources X Cultural Resources X Geoloqy and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and PlanninQ Mineral Resources X Noise Population and Housing I Public Services I Recreation I Transportation/Traffic I Utilities and Service Systems I Mandatory Findings of Significance I None Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a I NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not X be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by theproject proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothinQ further is required. ~\~ "\),~ Signature 'S h-I.\! olD Date Matthew D. Peters. Associate Planner Printed name Citv of Temecula For G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\ln~ial StUdy - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 3 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: I a. b. Issues and Suooortino Infonnation Sources Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? I Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrop pings, and historic buildings within a state scenic hiqhway? I Substantially degrade the existing visual character or I quality of the site and its surroundinqs? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Significant Imoacl Potentially I Significant Unless Mitigation Incarcorated I Less Than Significant Imoact X No Imoact X I c. d. X X Comments: 1. b. and c.: No Impact: The proposed project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is currently vacant with no structures or rock outcroppings on the site. Portions of the site to be developed have already been graded (5 acres) and do not contain any trees. Existing trees (associated with Willow-Mulefat Scrub) along the unnamed tributary to Empire Creek will be preserved as part of an open space easement on the property as defined by the California Department of Fish and Game's jurisdiction. Future development plans and building elevations will be reviewed for consistency with the City's Design Guidelines. Therefore, this project will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 1. a. and d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located on a hillside that is highly visible along Ynez Road and partially visible from 1-15. Future development plans and building elevations will be reviewed for consistency with the City's Design Guidelines. In addition, landscaping will be required as part of this project. The combination of plantings and future buildings will serve to hide a partially graded site. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. Future development on the project site will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with commercial development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 4 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a. Issues and SUDportin~ Information Sources Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-aqricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-aqricultural use? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X b. X c. X Comments: 2. a.-c.: No Impact: The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the recent and historic past the site has not been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\lnitial Study. TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 5 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. lb. c. I d. Ie. Issues and SupportincJ Information Sources Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Vioiate any air quality standard or contribute substantially I to an existinq or I?rojected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant I concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number I of people? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact X Less Than Significant Impact X X X X Comments: 3. a.: No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with the applicable air quality plan. The project site is comprised of 21.22 acres and will eventually accommodate six commercial lots consistent with the zoning and general plan designations for the site. The General Plan EIR assumed that development would occur on the subject site consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Community Commercial (CC). This General Plan designation is implemented through the City's Community Commercial (CC) zoning designation. The General Plan envisioned target floor area ratios (FAR's) for these designations and the General Plan EIR analyzed the potential impacts from potential uses in the Community Commercial zone. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted with the General Plan EIR for City-wide Air Quality impacts, primarily from mobile sources. The proposed project was anticipated as part of the industrial development in the City. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 3. b, d, and e.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The potential air quality impacts of the Auto Mall/Rancho Way Extension Grading were addressed in a Mitigated Negative Declaration circulated by the City July, 2005 using the Air Quality Management District's URBEMIS 2002 model. This analysis included the incorporation of the following mitigation measures to reduce potential air quality impacts, and will also be incorporated to address the remainder of the grading required to accommodate tentative parcel map (32924). . "Adequate watering techniques shall be employed to mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particulates from both the disturbed areas and haul roufes. The watering techniques shall be done at least three times per day. Portions of the project site that are under-going earth moving operations shall be watered such that a crust will be formed on the ground surface and then watered again at the end of the work day. " . "All earthmoving equipment shall use aqueous diesel fuel. " However, despite these measures, residents of the adjacent multiple family units may experience some additional dust and diesel odors when the grading operation is closest to their units and the wind direction is from the southwest or west, the common afternoon wind direction in this area. To ensure that the potential for construction-generated dust is minimized, the following mitigation measure will be implemented" G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 6 . "Grading operations shall be suspended when on-site wind speeds exceed 25 mph. " As a result of implementing these mitigation measures, the impacts are expected to be less than significant. 3. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in a substantial net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. The proposed project will emit typical emissions and dust associated with the grading and construction of a commercial site. The applicant is required to comply with the mitigation measures outlined above. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 7 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? a. b. c. d. e. f. Issues and Supoortinp Information Sources . Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorooraled No Impact Less Than Significanl Impact X X X X X X 4. a.-f.: Less Than Significant Impact: According to a biological resource and wetlands delineation study completed by the Thomas leslie Corporation, the areas where grading activities have and are proposed to occur consist primarily of non-native grasslands and ruderal vegetation. No sensitive wildlife species, including the California Gnatcatcher, Quino Checkerspot Butterfly and Burrowing Owl will be impacted by the development of this project. The wetland delineation study identified .06 acres of wetlands and approximately 1.4 acres of riparian Willow-Mulefat habitat along the northern portion of the site. However, this area will be protected via an open space easement, and is not proposed to be graded or affected by this project. The site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required to offset the effect of cumulative impacts to the species from urbanization occurring throughout western Riverside County. Finally, the applicant will be required to pay MSHCP mitigation fees. Less than Significant Impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:IPlanningI2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 8 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: c. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeoloqical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Directly or indireclly destroy a unique Paleontological resource or site or unique qeoloqic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred I outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Impact PotentJally Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X I a. lb. X X d. X Comments: 5. a, b and d.: No Impact: According to a Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment completed by BonTerra Consulting, the proposed tentative parcel map (32924) project site does not contain any archaeological sites or potentially significant resources. The study concluded that the site has a low potential to encounter any archaeological sites and archaeological monitoring is not recommended. The City of Temecula includes a standard Condition of Approval prior to issuance of a grading permit in the form of a note on the Grading Plan that states, ""If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeolog ical resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Based on the results of this report and the requirement of the Condition Approval stated above, no significant impacts are expected. 5. c.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The site has a high potential for buried paleontological resources and is covered by the Pauba Formation. Portions of the Pauba Formation are known to contain Pleistocene Era fossils. Due to the high potential for such resources to occur on the property, the following mitigation measure will be implemented: . "During excavation activities, a qualified pa/eontological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during grading activities. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding will be provided to collect; curate and report on these resources to ensure the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved." The same mitigation measure mentioned above was identified in a Mitigated Negative Declaration, July, 2005 for the project site that addressed the grading of an area about 5 acres in size along the future alignment of Rancho Way. The project involved the removal of approximately 140,000 cubic yards of material from the east side of Ynez Road and transporting the material across Ynez Road to the west side within the City's Auto Mall Expansion area to complete grading of the reconfigured parcels of Recorded Parcel Map 23496. As a result of this mitigation measure, no significant impacts are expected. G:\PlanningI2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\lnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 9 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Suooortino Information Sources a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvinq: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and GeoloflY Special Publication 42. I ii. Stronq seismic qround shakinQ? I Iii. Seismic-related qround failure, includinQ liquefaction? I iv. Landslides? I b. I Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? I c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreadinq, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or prof)erty? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation lncoroorafed No Impact less Than Significant Imoact x x X X X X X X 6. a. i.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Tract 3334, Lot 12 (Assessors Parcel Number 921-300-013) by Leighton Consulting, Inc identified evidence of faulting along the southwest portion of the site. A 50-foot setback on both sides of the fault line has been identified on the tentative parcel map (32924). The County Geologist reviewed and commented on the map and Geotechnical Investigation. As a result, the following mitigation shall be required in addition to the recommendations contained in the report that the City of Temecula Public Works Department will require to be followed as a Condition of Approval: . The Project Geologist should review the 40-scale grading plans for the project and the project geologist should be onsite during site grading to confirm the location and orientation of the onsite active faulting and evaluate the condition and distribution of the soil and rock material exposed in the cut and fills. 6. a. ii.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: There may be a potentially significant impact from seismic ground shaking, ground failure, soil erosion or expansive soils. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction, which is consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Further, the project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and if conditions warrant mitigation, recommendations contained in this report will be followed during construction. The soil reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. After mitigation measures are performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlannin911nitial Study. TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 10 6.a. iii., iv., c.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation incorporated: The development plan site is not located within an area delineated as a liquefaction hazard zone. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Tract 3334, Lot 12 (Assessors Parcel Number 921-300-013) by Leighton Consulting, Inc identified that the subject site has a low potential for liquefaction due to the dense physical characteristics of the underlying soils. Surface manifestation of liquefaction related distress to structural improvements are considered low provided the recommendation contained in the report are followed. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report will be utilized in the development of this site and required as a Condition of Approval by the Public Works Department, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from liquefaction. After mitigation measures are performed, no significant effects are anticipated as a result of this project. 6. b.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: To stabilize the manufactured slopes between the lots that will result from the approval of this project, a mitigation measure has been added: . Requiring the slopes to be planted in compliance with the City's "Slope Planting Guidelines," which will require the installation of permanent landscaping. After mitigation is performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6. d., e.: No Impact: Septic sewage disposal systems are not proposed for this project. The project will be required to hook up to the existing public sewer system. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnilial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 11 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Issues and Suooortino Information Sources 'Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existinq or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or publiC use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinq in the J)roject area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinq in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incarcorated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X X 7. a.: Less Than Significant Impact: The streets leading to the project are not transportation routes designated for commercial haulers who may be transporting hazardous materials. However, because the property and the surrounding area are and will be used for commercial buildings, future tenants may include businesses that require the delivery of hazardous materials. When an application is made for future tenant improvements, a Statement of Operations and a Business Plan will be required for review by the City's Fire Department to identify the likelihood of hazardous impacts and to assess the appropriate mitigation measures. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The tentative parcel map (32924) proposes six lots for commercial uses. Since the activities of future tenants will be addressed during tenant improvements as noted in 7.a. above, it is not anticipated that the project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 12 7. C.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project area is beyond one-quarter mile of any existing or proposed schools. The operation of construction equipment and machinery during the development of this site may emit some hazardous emissions. However, these emissions should be of limited quantities over a short duration of time. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 7. d.: No Impact: The project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not result in a significant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. e-f. No Impact: The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport or private air strip. No impact to people working in the area or airport uses is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 7. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. h.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not adjacent to a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. Future development shall comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. This project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 13 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. Ii. Issues and SUDoortinQ Infonnation Sources . Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been i=lranted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodini=l on- or off-site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of ~olluted runoff? I Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? I Place within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? I Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoad Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation InCOl'Dorated No Impact X less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X X X 8. a.: No Impact: The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Development will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8. b., f.: No Impact: The proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals. Future development on the lots created by this tentative parcel map (32924) will reqUired to comply with local development standards, including lot coverage and G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 14 landscaping requirements, which will allow percolation and ground water recharge. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The proposed project will include an on-site drainage plan; however it will not alter off-site drainage patterns or alter the course of a stream or river, and will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The project is also required to comply with Best Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination Discharge System (NPEDS) standards, which addresses drainage, siltation and erosion. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site because the project will not alter the course of a stream or river. The City of Temecula Public Works Department reviews all drainage plans and determines adequate drainage facilities are in place capable of on-site drainage and that off-site drainage facilities can accommodate additional flow. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 8. e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project is required to comply with Best Management Practices (BMP's), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations as well as National Pollution Elimination Discharge Elimination System standards, which address drainage and polluted runoff. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 8. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not a residential project and therefore will not place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project 8. h., i: No Impact: The project will have no impact on people or property to water related hazards such as flooding because the project site is located outside of the 100 year f100dway and any dam inundation areas for both Lake Skinner and Diamond Valley Reservoirs as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8. j.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located near a coast line which would be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanning\lnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 15 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: I a. b. I c. Issues and SUDoortinq Information Sources PhYSically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: Potentially Significant tmoad Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact X X Less Than Significant Impact X 9.a.-c.: No Impact: The proposed parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, currently zoned Community Commercial (CC), and will not divide an established community or conflict with the applicable land use plan. The proposed parcel map is also consistent with the City of Temecula Development Code. The parcel map will allow for the development of community commercial uses to promote the development of attractive comprehensively planned uses that will provide the City with a sound and diverse industrial base.. The project is consistent with the applicable Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition, the proposed parcel map (32924) will include the dedication of a portion of Rancho Way and a connection to the neighboring Temecula Town Center, commonly referred to as the "Target" Shopping Center. Rancho Way is identified as a secondary arterial connecting Diaz Road to Margarita Road in the City of Temecula General Plan, and will eventually provide a much needed east-west connection within the City. In addition, the connection to the Temecula Town Center will provide an additional means of access to alleviate congestion in and around the shopping center. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. b. Issues and SUDoortinq Information Sources Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local Qeneral plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact X Less Than Significant Impact X 10. a.-b.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to include minerals that are considered of value to the region and/or the state. The proposed project will not result in the loss of a locally-important mineral resource because the project site is not identified as an important site known to maintain such resources as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:IPlanningI2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPianningllnilial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 16 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. lb. c. d. e. f. Issues and $upoortina Information Sources Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other aqencies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive I qroundborne vibration or qroundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the I?roiect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the proiect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact . Potentially I Significant Unless I Mitigation Incorporated X No Impact Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X 11. a.-d.: Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The site is currently vacant and development of the land will result in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long-term. However, long term operational noise levels will be required to be within noise level standards established by the Noise Element of the City of Temecula General Plan. According to the Noise Study completed by Weiland Associates for the Auto Mall/Rancho Way Extension Grading, Tables 5-1 and 5-2, it is estimated that the construction operation will generate a community noise equivalent level CNEl of 70-79 dB at the nearest apartment buildings. The following mitigation measures are recommended for compliance with the City's CNEL standard of 65 dB at the adjacent apartments: . To maintain the City's CNEL criteria (from the adopted General Plan), daytime and nighttime grading activities shall not be permitted within the same 24-hour period. . During daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), and prior to any nighttime grading activities, an earthen berm shall be constructed along the eastern and northern sides of the construction area on the "source site". . The construction contractor shall implement a noise awareness program for construction workers. The onsite construction supervisor shall be authorized to receive noise complaints and is responsible for their resolution. . All construction equipment shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffling devices. . To the extent feasible, construction activities shall be scheduled to avoid operating multiple pieces of equipment simultaneously, which causes higher noise levels. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\lnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 17 . The construction contractor shall avoid unnecessary equipment idling for long periods. . Back-up horns shall be replaced with alternatives such as warning lights, hand signals, and/or continuous loop routes. . No construction-related public address loudspeaker, two-way radio or music system shall be audible at any adjacent noise-sensitive land use. . Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented where feasible. . Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be placed away from sensitive receptors in an areas approved by the Department of Public Works. . Grading and construction equipment shall be stored on the project site while not in use. 11. e.-f.: No Impact: This project is not within two miles of a public airport or private airstrip. Therefore, people working in the project are will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport and no impacts will result from this project. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: b. Issues and Suooortinq Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of reolacement housinq elsewhere? Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated Less Than Significant Imoact No Imoact X a. X I c. x Comments: 12. a.-c.: No Impact: The tentative map will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project site is zoned community commercial and residential uses are not allowed as a permitted use. The project site is vacant and will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is developed within a commercial zone. The project will neither displace housing nor people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-Q004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 18 I a. lb. I c. I d. e. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? Issues and SUDoortinQ Information Sources Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? I Other public facilities? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X Comments: 13. a.-e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The tentative map will facilitate commercial development that will have a very minor (less than significant) impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some public services. However, the increase is expected to be a very small increment that can be addressed through the City's budget process. As a result, the project will have a less than significant impact upon the need for new or altered public facilities. The project will not have an impact upon, and will not result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District have been made aware of this project. Sewer and water is currently provided for the surrounding commercial development, so extending service to this site is possible, which would result in less than significant impacts as a result of the project. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14. RECREATION. a. Issues and SUDPortina Information Sources Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporaled No Impact X Less Than Significant Impact b. X Comments: 14. a.: No Impact: The tentative map will facilitate commercial development in a commercial zone. The project will not displace recreationally zoned lands or remove vacant lands that are used for recreational purposes. The anticipated need to increase the neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities as a result of this project is not anticipated. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 14. b.: No Impact: The proposed project does not include an open space or recreational aspect to the project. Furthermore, the project will not require the construction or expansion of additional recreational facilities. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G:\Planning\200SIPAOS-G004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Seiby).doc 19 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. b. c. d. Ie. I f. g. Issues and SuoDortina Information Sources 'Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion manapement aGency for desionated roads or hiohways? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.q., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emerqency access? Result in inadequate parkino. capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X 15. a.-b: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located off Ynez Road, which is identified as a principal arterial (6-lane divided) on the City's Roadway Plan, and on proposed Rancho Way, which is identified as a secondary arterial (4-lanes undivided). There will be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets once the proposed project is developed. The City's Traffic Engineer has indicated that the project would have a less than significant impact to the existing road system because the existing roadways have been developed consistent with the City's General Plan and in anticipation of the area's proposed commercial development and the future access link to the east and west via Rancho Way. Because the land use intensity is consistent with the General Plan, no further traffic studies were required for this project. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. c.: No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on the air traffic patterns and will not result in a substantial safety risk. This site is not within the French Valley Airport influence area. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 15. d-f.: No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed project provides for adequate ingress and egress from the site. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that adequate emergency access has been provided. In addition, on- site circulation has been reviewed using the emergency vehicle turning radius templates and it has been determined that on-site circulation is adequate for emergency vehicles. Future development on the site will meet community commercial use parking requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Temecula Development Code. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 15. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is consistent with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation as identified in the adopted General Plan. Therefore, no impacts will result from this project. G;\PlanningI2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\lnilial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 20 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and $uooortino Information Sources I a. I Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Reqional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? If. I Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to I accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? I g. I Comply with federaL state, and locai statutes and I requlations related to solid waste? Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact X X X X X X X 16. a., b., e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities on site that will connect to the existing system currently in place along Ynez Road. The design of the existing system is sufficient to handle the runoff from this project and will not require the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. In addition, Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying water to 167,640 persons within its service area in 2020 (p. 5.14-3)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16. f., g.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 21 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. b. c. Issues and Suooortinq Infonnation Sources Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or I)rehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current proiects, and the effects of probable future proiects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact X Less Than Significant Impact X X 17. a.: No Impact: This site, which has been previously graded and is located in an area with other commercial development, does not contain any viable habitat for fish or wildlife species. This proposed project is within the boundaries of a planned commercial area and it does not have the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The effects from this project are less than significant with Mitigation Measures incorporated into the project. The project will not have a cumulative effect on the environment since the project will result in commercial development in an urban area, surrounded on three sides by existing commercial and high density (multifamily) development. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures in place, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The cumulative impacts related to the future development of this site will not have a significant impact. 17. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The tentative parcel map will allow for future commercial development on 6 lots that will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code, and General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 22 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. I b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitiqation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 18.a.: A previously completed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Auto Mall/Rancho Way Extension Grading EA 121, July 2005 was referenced during the preparation of this Mitigated Negative Declaration. The previous Mitigated Negative Declaration is available for review at Temecula City Hall, Planning Department. 18. b., c.: There were earlier impacts, which affected this project and were addressed in a Mitigation Monitoring Program. The same mitigation required for Air Quality, Biological Resources and Noise sections were incorporated into this Mitigated Negative Declaration. SOURCES 1. City of T emecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. Biologic and Jurisdictional Investigation, prepared by Thomas Leslie Corporation, July 30, 2004. 4. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Proposed Selby 21.22-Acre Development Project, prepared by BonTerra Consulting, August 16, 2005 5. Preliminary Soil Investigation/Liquefaction Study, prepared by Leighton and Associates, December 17, 1985. 6. Noise Study for the Rough Grading of the Temecula Auto Mall Expansion in the City of Temecula, prepared by Weiland Associates, May 2005. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanningllnitial Study - TPM 32924 (Selby).doc 23 ATTACHMENT NO.6 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel MaplPlanninglSelby SR - PC STAFF REPORT.doc 12 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0004, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 (SELBY) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact AIR QUALITY The proposed project could violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentration, and could potentially create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people working in the nearby area. Mitigation Measure Adequate watering techniques shall be employed to mitigate the impact of construction-generated dust particulates from both the disturbed areas and haul routes. The watering techniques shall be done at least three times per day. Portions of the project site that are under-going earth moving operations shall be watered such that a crust will be formed on the ground surface and then watered again at the end of the work day. All earthmoving equipment shall use aqueous diesel fuel. Grading operations shall be suspended when on-site wind speeds exceed 25 mph. G"\Planning\2005\PAOS.0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Table MMP.doc Page 1 of5 Time Frame I Monitoring Milestones Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be inciuded as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Responsible Monitoring Party City of TemecuJa Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecu/a Planning and Public Works Departments TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact CULTURAL RESOURCES Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological resources. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Mitigation Measure During excavation activities, a qualified paleontological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during grading activities. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding will be provided to collect; curate and report on these resources to ensure the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and . preserved. Time Frame I Monitoring Milestones Prior to issuance of a grading permit and during grading activity as appropriate. Written documentation of agreements and contracts to be submitted to Planning Department. The Project Geologist should review the 40-scale grading Prior to issuance of a grading plans for the project and the project geologist should be permit and during grading onsite during site grading to confirm the location and activities. orientation of the onsite active faulting and evaluate the condition and distribution of the soil and rock material exposed in the cut and fills. G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Table MMP.doc Page2of5 Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning, Building and Public Works Departments General Impact GEOLOGY AND SOILS Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, and landslides. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure Time Frame I Monitoring Milestones The project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior Prior to issuance of a grading to grading and if conditions warrant mitigation, permit. recommendations contained in this report will be followed during construction. The soil reports will also contain recommendations for the compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. Requiring the slopes to be planted in compliance with the Prior to issuance of a building City's "Slope Planting Guidelines," which will require the permit, and prior to occupancy. installation of permanent landscaping. After mitigation is performed, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. G:\PJanning\2005\PAOS.0004 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Table MMP.doc Page 3 of5 Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Public Works Department City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM General Impact NOISE Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Mitigation Measure To maintain the City's CNEL criteria (from the adopted General Plan), daytime and nighttime grading activities shall not be permitted within the same 24-hour period. During daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.), and prior to any nighttime grading activities, an earthen berm shall be constructed along the eastern and northern sides of the construction area on the "source site". The construction contractor shall implement a noise awareness program for construction workers. The onsite construction supervisor shall be authorized to receive noise complaints and is responsible for their resolution. G.\Planning\2005\PA05~OO04 TPM Selby Parcel Map\Planning\Table MMP.doc Page 4 of5 Time Frame I Monitoring Milestones Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments General Impact NOISE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 32924 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measure All construction equipment shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained muffling devices. The. construction contractor shall avoid unnecessary equipment Idling for long periods. Back-up horns shall be replaced with alternatives such as warning lights, hand signals, and/or continuous loop routes. No construction-related public address loudspeaker, two-way radio or music system shall be audible at any adjacent noise-sensitive land use. Construction techniques designed to reduce noise shall be implemented where feasible. Areas reserved for testing and fixing equipment shall be placed away from sensitive receptors in an areas approved by the Department of Public Works. Grading and construction equipment shall be stored on the project site while not in use. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0004 TPM Selby Parcel Mllp\Planning\Table MMP,doc Page.5 of5 Time Frame I Monitoring Milestones Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during !:lradinq and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during Qrading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during 9!adinq and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during gradin!:l and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during grading and construction. Mitigation Measure shall be included as a note on the Grading Plan. To be monitored during !:lradin!:l and construction. Responsible Monitoring Party City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Departments City of Temecula Planning and Public Works Deoartments ITEM #6 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dale West, Associate Planner DATE: April 19, 2006 SUBJECT: Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (PA04-0596) BACKGROUND The City Council originally approved the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) on February 8, 1994. Periodically, since that time, the Specific Plan has been modified to respond to the ever changing environment in Old Town. Staff reviewed the proposed changes to the Specific Plan with the Old Town Local Review Board (OTlRB) on March 13, 2006, at which time the Board provided their comments and recommendations. The OTlRB recommendations have been incorporated into this staff report for discussion by the Planning Commission. ANALYSIS The current amendment originates from a number of issues that have come up since the Specific Plan was updated earlier this year. By addressing these issues staff believes that that the OTSP will enable a more appropriate style of development and that the revitalization of Old Town will be improved. Staff has attached a redline/strikeout version of the proposed changes to the Old Town Specific Plan to this staff report. The proposed changes are summarized as follows: . Allow '10r profit" museums within the Medium Density and High Density Residential Planning Areas . Delete the Conditional Use Permit requirement for mixed use projects, and allow the determination for individual uses within a mixed use project to be based on the use matrix . Require residential uses within mixed use projects to provide on-site parking for each residential unit, or accept an in-lieu parking fee . Provide flexibility in how private open space is provide for mixed use projects . Expand the historic preservation requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan to five designated historic sites outside of Old Town Temecula and to clarify the requirements for making finding of historic appropriateness . Incorporate design standards for the remaining alleys in Old Town and . Make a number of minor clarifications to the sign provisions, design guidelines and the permitted use matrix R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04.QS96 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl1 Staff Report 2.doc "For Profit" Museums Staff proposes to amend the regulations for the Medium Density and High Density Residential Planning Areas to allow "for profit" museums within these districts of the Old Town Specific Plan. This proposed amendment will allow the existing building, located at 41915 Fourth Street (the Arviso House) to be moved to same owner's property along Pujol Street. This will then enable the property at Fourth Street to be better utilized. Mixed Use Proiect ReQuirements At this time the first new mixed use buildings are being proposed within Old Town. While staff reviewed the applications for conformity with the Specific Plan, staff has identified potential unanticipated consequences. Staff is recommending that the conditional use permit requirement for mixed use projects be removed from the Specific Plan. In doing this, residential uses within a mixed use project will be permitted by right, whereas the determination for non-residential uses will be made based on the Land Use Matrix (Table 11I-1), which identifies specific uses as either permitted, conditionally permitted or prohibited in its corresponding columns for Tourist Serving Residential and Tourist Retail Core. The policy that eliminated off-street parking within Old Town in order to stimulate economic development within Old Town has worked as anticipated; however, in the interest of sustaining economic development and vitality of mixed use projects, staff is concerned that the continuation of this policy could have a negative impact on the residential component of mixed use development within Old Town. Therefore, staff is proposing that mixed use projects require one on-site parking space for each proposed residential unit. Staff is also proposing, as part of this provision, that if the parking requirement cannot be met, then the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to pay an "in-lieu" parking fee. The Specific Plan will make reference to this; however the calculation of the in-lieu parking fee will be addressed in a separate resolution to be adopted by the City Council. This on-site parking requirement for residential uses in mixed use development will eliminate the need for residents to compete for parking on the street or in public parking lots and help ensure the viability of residential mixed-use development. Currently the Specific Plan requires that each residential unit have its own private open space; however, staff feels that allowing more flexibility with this requirement could result in more interesting and greater variety of residential lifestyles within mixed use development within Old Town. Therefore, staff is recommending that private open space requirement for mixed use projects in the Old Town area be reduced from 150 square feet to 75 square feet per unit, and to allow the private open space requirement to be met individually per unit, communally for the entire project, or in a combination of both approaches. OTLRB Recommendation/Staff Comments: The OTlRB recommended that staff include the formula for calculating the in-lieu parking fee in the Old Town Specific Plan. However, the City Attorney has reminded us that although it is appropriate to reference the in-lieu parking fee in the Specific Plan, an in-lieu parking fee is subject to Government Code 66000, et. seq. This requires the preparation of a report documenting the need for the fee, and the adoption of the fee through a separate resolution and ordinance by the City Council. Exoan~i(:>n <:>f the Historic Preservation Provisions In recent months, there has been a growing concern that the historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula do not have the same protections as the historic structures within Old Town. As a result, R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0S9S Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\l Staff Report 2.doc 2 staff has identified a mechanism to extend these protection provisions without creating a new Board or Commission. The proposal would modify the historic preservation provisions in Chapter V of the Old Town Specific Plan to apply to designated historic structures within the City. According to the proposed amendment, the Old Town Local Review Board will have the opportunity to review any proposed changes to the ex1erior of the building before the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission considers the proposed changes. The proposed amendment would add the following structures to the list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures: 1. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South. (Built in 1918, the complex served as management seat for all the Temecula area ranchos owned by the Vails.) 2. Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos. (Adobe house built in 1926 by Mohlon Vail; overlooks Vail Ranch) 3. Wolf Tomb located at 45334 Maguey Court. (Monument to Louis Wolf, a prominent early settler of Temecula.) 4. Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue. (Built in 1879 and made of indigenous clay and straw adobe bricks. Home of one of Temecula's most prominent citizens.) The other changes to the historic preservation requirements consist of a minor change to how a determination of historic appropriateness is made; focusing on the determination action rather than on the issuance of a certificate. These changes will not affect how the Old Town local Review Board currently operates. OTLRB Recommendation/Sfaff Commenfs: The OTlRB recommended adding the Mercedes Pujol School to the list of Designated Historic Structures outside of Old Town Temecula. Staff feels that the Mercedes Pujol School qualifies as a historic structure within the City of Temecula because it's architectural style is typical of old town school houses, however, a process for adding and removing structures from the Temecula local Historic Register is not identified within the Specific Plan. Upon further discussion with the City Attorney, staff proposes to add criteria similar to that used in CEQA for determining the historical/cultural significance of a structure. The criteria would be used by the OTLRB when making a finding that a structure is historically significant to the City of T emecula. Additionally, staff proposes to add a process to the Specific Plan for adding and removing structures from the Temecula Local Historic Register. Staff proposes that Section F, for level Two Projects, be revised to identify this process and include the list of criteria and required documentation for adding or removing structures from the Temecula Local Historic Register. Staff proposes to include criteria similar with that criteria used to determine cultural/historical significance for California Environmental Quality Act analysis, as follows: 1. Is the structure associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of Temecula's history and cultural heritage? 2. Is the structure associated with the lives of persons important in Temecula's past? 3. Does the structure embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important individual, or possesses high artistic values? or 4. Has the structure yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history of Temecula? R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\l Staff Report 2.doc 3 Allevs Another area of concern within Old Town is the need to maintain and protect the remaining alleys within aid Town Temecula. Over the years, many of the alleys within Old Town have been vacated and currently only about half of them remain. Staff is recommending that the remaining alleys, as identified in Attachment No.5, be protected from future actions leading to vacating these alleys. To accomplish this, the proposed amendment would require the protection of the remaining alleys and would establish design and improvement criteria within the OTSP. Most of the remaining alleys would retain a primarily vehicular function. The exception is the small alley between Fourth and Fifth Streets that runs between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek. Portions of this alley have been designated primarily for pedestrian use. The exception to this provision is that if development plan is proposed with exceptional architecture that encourages and includes new public pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation to the proposed project and surrounding uses, then the City Council may consider vacating an existing alley within the proposed project site. Other Clarifications/Chanaes The remaining changes represent minor corrections and clarifications that include: updating of the correct title for the color palette, adding Day Spas as permitted uses in the Tourist Retail Core and Community Commercial Planning Areas, revising and updating sign standards, and clarifying that plywood is an unacceptable exterior material. OTLRB Recommendation/Staff Comments: The OTLRB recommended allowing painted building signs and signage along Murrieta Creek. Staff supports this recommendation and as a result has proposed changes to the sign regulations that allow this. The OTlRB also recommended that the Specific Plan be amended to allow signage for commercial tenants above the second floor on buildings that are three or more stories. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff evaluated the proposed amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). An Initial Environment Study (IES) was prepared to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed changes to the Old Town Specific Plan and the expanding of the historic preservation provisions. The I ES identified no potentially significant impacts from this amendment. The IES and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration were circulated for public review between March 30, 2006 and April 19, 2006. No significant comments were received. As a result, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be adopted for this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve a Negative Declaration for, and amendment to, the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\1Staff Report 2.doc 4 ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution No. 06-_ - Blue Page 6 Exhibit A - Proposed City Council Resolution No. 06-_ Exhibit B - Proposed City Council Ordinance No. 06-_ 2. Redline/Strike-Out Revisions to the Old Town Specific Plan - Blue Page 7 3. Initial Environmental Study - Blue Page 8 R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl1 Staff Report 2.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\l Staff Report 2.doc 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE AMENDMENT (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0596) Section 1. On February 8, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan to guide the revitalization and historic preservation of Old Town Temecula. Section 2. revitalization efforts opportunities arise. The City Council has approved subsequent amendments to facilitate the in Old Town Temecula as circumstances have changed and as new Section 3. The City desires to extend the historic preservation provisions to designated historic structures within the City. Section 4. The City desires to ensure that the remaining alleys within Old Town Temecula continue to function as pedestrian and vehicular access to the adjacent properties. Section 5. To accomplish these ends, the City desires to amend the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 6. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 7. Findinos. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA04-0596 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.16.020.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Section 8. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on April 19, 2006 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. Section 9. Recommendation of Approval. The Planning Commission for the City of T emecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution and ordinance approving the proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibits A and B. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04.0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\2PC Resolution.doc Section 10. Environmental Comoliance. An Initial Environment Study (IES) was prepared to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed changes to the Old Town Specific Plan and the expanding of the historic preservation provisions. The IES identified no potentially significant impacts from this proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. The IES and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration were circulated for public review between March 30, 2006 and April 19, 2006. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for this proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 11. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of April 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby that the PC Resolution No. 06_ was duly adopted and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\2PC Resolution.doc 2 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\1 Staff Report 2.doc 8 RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0596 AMENDING THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECUlA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOllOWS: Section 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 2. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on April 19, 2006 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental determination, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter. Section 3. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-_, recommending approval of the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. Section 4. The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on _, 2006 to consider the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. Section 5. On _, 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Section 6. On , 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan when it adopted Resolution No. 06-_. Section 7. Findings. The City Council, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA04-0596 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.16.020.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. R:IOTSPlPlan AmendmentslPA04.0596 Supplemental Clean.uplPC Documents\3CCResolution Exhibit A.doc 1 Section 8. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Environment Study (IES) was prepared to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed changes to the Old Town Specific Plan and the expanding of the historic preservation provisions. The IES identified no potentially significant impacts from this proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. The IES and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration were circulated for public review between March 30, 2006 and April 19, 2006. As a result, the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a Negative Declaration for this proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 9. The City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA04-0596, proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of _, Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\3CCResolution Exhibit A.doc 2 EXHIBIT B PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 06-_ R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean.up\PC Documents\1Staff Report 2.doc 9 ORDINANCE NO. 06-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0596) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Approval. The City Council for the City of Temecula hereby amends the Old Town Specific Plan as described in Exhibit A of this Ordinance. Section 2. Environmental Determination. An Initial Environment Study (IES) was prepared to assess the potential impacts associated with the proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan, including expanding the historic preservation provisions to selected properties outside of Old Town Temecula. The IES identified no potentially significant impacts from the proposed amendment. The IES and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration were circulated for public review between March 30, 2006 and April 19, 2006. No significant comments were received. Based upon the information contained in the Agenda Report and the testimony received at public hearing, the City Council hereby adopts a Negative Declaration for the proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. Section 3. Severabilitv. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Notice of Adootion. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl50rdinance.doc -1- PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 06-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council on the day of , and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the _ day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl50rdinance.doc -2- EXHIBIT A RIOTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl50rdinance.doc -3 - EXHIBIT A 1. Amend second paragraph in Subsection III.C as follows: "Permitted uses for the Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Open Space (OS) Planning Areas shall be the same as identified in the Development Code for the Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential and Opens Space/Conservation zones, respectively, as periodically amended, except that "for profit museums" shall also be conditionally permitted in the Medium Density and High Density Residential Planning Areas." 2. Amend portion of Table 111-1 by adding "Mixed Use Projects" and "Day Spa" to the list of uses and by adding footnote number 6 as follows: TABLE 11I-1 LAND USE MATRIX HT OTC TRC I cc LIST OF USES I TSR" I ID I Day Spa 1M I Mixed Use Projects 6 I P I J I P I 16. Individual uses within each mixed use project shall be determined by this land Use Matrix. P P 3. Amend footnote Number 2 in Table 111-1 to read as follows: "2. These uses are limited to either the second floor (or higher) or to a location that does not front upon or open directly onto either Old Town Front Street or Main Street. " 4. Amend Footnote Number 3 in Table 111-2 to read as follows: "3. Buildings shall be setback exactly ten feet if no covered arcade or porch is provided at the front of the building except in cases of exceptional building- design and material quality and when the Director of Planning determines that a lesser distance will achieve the streetscape goals of this Specific Plan." 5. Amend Footnote Number 6 Table 111-2 to read as follows: "6. Landscaping of the front yard for residential projects in the TSR Planning Area is required. Limited accent landscaping shall be provided whenever possible in all other circumstances, and always between the front of the building and the public right-of-way." R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-DS96 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 6. Amend Table 111-2 by replacing the minimum private opens space per unit in the TRC/TSR zoning district from 150 to 75 square feet per unit and by adding a footnote number 7 beside the "75 sq. ft." under the Minimum Private Open Space/Unit for the TRC/TSR Planning Area to read as follows: '7. In lieu of providing 75 square feet of private opens space per unit for mixed use projects, the amount of private open space may be reduced if combined with common private open space, as long as the total open space required for the project remains the same." 7. Amend the Title for Section III.E.3, by replacing the second "Codes" with "Regulations". 8. Remove Subsection III.F.3.b and renumber the subsequent subsection. 9. Amend Subsection III.F.3.b.iv to read as follows: "iv. Structures with heights greater than three stories shall set back on the street frontage sides for the fourth floor portion of the structure a minimum of 1 0 feet except in cases of exceptional building-design and material quality or when the Director of Planning determines that a distance of less than 10 feet is appropriate. " 10. Amend Subsection III.F.3.b.vi. as follows: "One parking space per residential unit shall be provided on site and screened from public view. If this parking requirement cannot be met, then the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to accept an "in lieu" parking fee in an amount set by resolution of the City Council. Acceptance of an "in-lieu" parking fee is at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Separate access drives and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses whenever possible." 11. Amend Section III.F.7 to read as follows: "7. Loading Facilities Loading and unloading facilities shall be visually screened from access streets and adjacent properties and constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such function. When screening of loading and unloading facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the building. Loading and unloading areas in or adjacent to the alleys do not require additional visual screening." 12. Amend a new Section III.F.15 to read as follows: "1 S. Alleys Designated alleys within Old Town shall be maintained and protected for future public use. The design and components within each alley shall be consistent with the purpose identified within this Specific Plan. Development projects adjacent to the designated alleys will be required to construct improvements in and adjacent to the alley. These improvements shall include paving, lighting, or other necessary components to ensure the functionality and safety of the designated alleys. Limited landscaping should be R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 2 provided when feasible provided that the functionality of the alley is not effected. When resident or business parking is established in the rear yard areas adjacent to the alleys, access to these parking spaces may be provided directly from the alleys." 13. Amend Subsection G of Section III to read as follows: "G. SIGN REGULATIONS The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signage that will ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's. 1. Applicability These regulations shall apply to all signage within the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential areas of the Specific Plan. Signage within the Highway Tourist Commercial District, Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential District, and High Density Residential land Use Districts shall comply with the sign requirements contained in the Development Code and the Signage Design Guidelines contained in Section IV.J of the Specific Plan. 2. Permit Required Unless specifically stated in these regulations, a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Specific Plan. 3. Prohibitions No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to, or in violation of, the provisions of these sign regulations. All signs not expressly permitted by this Section are prohibited. No application for sign permit or other application for a prohibited sign shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved. 4. Prohibited Signs in Old Town o Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of road frontage (except for mini monument signs) o Roof mounted signs o Animated signs, including time and temperature displays o Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs o Balloon signs o Ambient air balloons o Internally illuminated signs, including front and back lit awning and window locations o Neon tube signs o Window signs above the second story o Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting - except holiday decorations o Formed plastic or injection molded signs o Statues used for advertising R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\60rdlnance Exhibit A2.doc 3 o Traffic sign replicas o Vehicle signs o Any sign not permitted by this Specific Plan o Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly permitted in this Specific Plan 5. Permitted Signs o Mini-monument Signs (for buildings constructed before 1994) o Wall Mounted Signs (business identification) o Hanging Signs o Rear and Interior Facing Signs o Supergraphics U Freestanding Signs o Window Signs o Under Canopy Signs o Awning Signs o Projecting Signs o Indirectly Illuminated Signs o Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs o Accessory Signs (examples include building name, directional, menu board, and daily special signs) o Painted Building Signs (The appropriate location is at the discretion of the Director of Planning) 6. Sign Standards a. Allowable Sign Area. Unless specifically exempted for this requirement, the total amount of signage for each business shall be limited to the following. i. Business establishments having a single frontage onto a public street, or buildings with one building entrance, are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of sign per linear foot of business establishment frontage. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section. ii. Business establishments having frontage onto two public streets are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of sign per linear foot of business establishment frontage along the primary street and 0.5 square feet of sign area per linear foot of business establishment frontage along the secondary street. Business establishments that have frontage along the Murrieta Creek shall also be permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of sign per linear foot of business establishment frontage along the creek frontage. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section. RIOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 4 b. Building Surface Signs. Except as specified below, all building surface signage shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. I. Wall Mounted Sions. Maximum of one square foot per linear frontage foot of business establishment. To be located no higher than the lowest of the following points: 25 feet above grade; . Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or . Cornice line of the building. ii. Hanoino Sions. As an alternative to the standard wall sign, an under canopy hanging sign may be used. Hanging signs must be parallel to the street and, in addition, hanging signs may not exceed 75% of the width of the business frontage or be more than 12 inches in height. If located over a walkway, the vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade shall be a minimum of 7 feet. Iii. Rear Facino Sions. If a building has parking or pedestrian access at the rear, each business is permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 3 square feet. The rear facin9 sign can either be located adjacent to the entry point, or on the exterior rear facing wall of the business. iv. Interior Facino Sians. Where a building has a courtyard or interior plaza that can not be viewed from the public right of way, each business shall be permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 5 percent of the total interior courtyard wall area of the business. Interior facing signage shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. v. Suoeroraohics. The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. A supergraphic is a mosaic, mural, painting, graphic art, or combination thereof which is professionally applied to a building that does not contain any brand name, product name, letters of the alphabet spelling or abbreviating the name of any product, company, profession, or business, or any 1090, trademark, trade name, or other commercial message. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of wall surface. Supergraphics shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. c. Other Buildino Sions. All window, awnin9 and projecting signs shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. i. Permanent Window Sions. On ground level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building; on second level: coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are permitted above second floor). R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-Q596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 5 ii. Awninc Sicns. On ground floor level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above: coverage shall not exceed 10 percent of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internal illumination prohibited. . .-- . ;: ...-.........-.....-......- ,'----'-,-,-_._-- '.-.,. ._-_.~._,--,.,.- ,:~'tl,'#.~t~..r.;[~.r~q!J,.'.~t..4r-'~YI,r,',::r..'.:.~-.'k~:',r,I~,\;~~~~~~::,::~;-~'~'" ~. 'j iii. Proiectinc Sicns. One per business allowed; maximum size may not exceed 6 square feet and shall not extend more than 4 feet from the wall surface. No illumination is allowed. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs, and shall maintain at least 7 feet of vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Each tenant may have a projecting sign. No tenant may have both a projecting and mini- monument sign. ';~- l~lct .. --=-~~l~:~: & Gat;d~n iv. Under CanoDv Sicns. One per business allowed. Permitted under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet; minimum of 7 feet of vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-Q596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 6 4 I , , d. Freestandina Sians. Freestanding signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. Only one freestanding sign is allowed per site. For this purpose, "site" is defined as any single parcel or a group of parcels developed under a unified development plan, whichever covers the larger area. i. Multi-tenant Siqns. A maximum of one double sided sign per street frontage if said street frontage is over 150 feet. Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade. Width shall not exceed 4 feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches in height. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated; internal illumination is prohibited. No monument signs are allowed if the street frontage is less than 150 feet. ii. Mini-Monument Sians. A maximum of one double face mlnl- monument sign is permitted if the street frontage is less than 150 feet, if the building existed prior to 1994, and if the building is set back more that ten feet from the street. The maximum sign area shall not exceed 6 square feet. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated; internal illumination is prohibited. The height of the sign shall not exceed 4 feet. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc, the height may be increased consistent with period element at the sole discretion of the Director of Planning. If a building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall still only be one mini-monument sign allowed. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0S96 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 7 e. Temoorarv Sians. Temporary signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. The types of temporary signs are as follows. i. Temoorarv Banners. Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establishment on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other freestanding element (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not permitted. The use of neon colored/day glow banner signs are also prohibited. All temporary signs, except for A-Frame/Sandwich Boards, shall abide by the provisions of the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, as amended. ii. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Sian. One A-frame or sandwich board sign allowed per property on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and designated Monday holidays. The size shall not exceed 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-frame signs shall not block the sidewalk and shall not be illuminated. No permit is required for A-frame and sandwich board signs which comply with these provisions. f. . Accessorv Sians. Accessory signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. The types of accessory signs are as follows. i. Buildina Name Sian. The purpose of allowing building name signs is to allow for the identification of buildings. The maximum size shall not exceed 10 percent of the wall surface. In the event that the building name advertises one or more businesses located within the building, the signage will not be considered a building name sign but will be included in the total square footage permitted for the business or building. ii. Directional Sians. Interior project directional signage may be allowed in interior courtyards or adjacent to stairways or elevators, to guide patrons to rear area and upstairs tenants. The maximum size may not exceed 3 square feet. iii. Menu Boards. One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The maximum size may not exceed 4 square feet. Menu Boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. RIOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Oocumentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 8 Appropriate location tor menu board sign .- iv. Oailv Soecial Sians. One display area size near the primary entrance is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The maximum size is 4 square feet. g. Flaas. A maximum of three colored flags may be displayed at anyone time. The maximum size is 6 square feet. These flags may not contain writing, insignias, or logos." 14. Amend Section IV.B.1 by adding a new bullet item to the list of discouraged materials to read as follows: ". Plywood" 15. Amend Section IV.B.1 by revising the last bullet item for Guideline 7 to read as follows: ". Rough textured vertical wood siding with appropriately spaced wooden battens." 16. Amend Sections IV.B.1 and 3 by replacing the words "Heritage Colors" with "Preservation Exterior Palette." 17. Amend Section IV by adding a new Subsection L to read as follows: "L. ALLEY GUIDELINES The alleys in Old Town Temecula were originally created with the original plat and subdivision in the 1 B80's. Since that time, many of the alleys have been eliminated. As part of the revitalization efforts in Old Town, it has been determined that the remaining alleys should be preserved and integrated into the Specific Plan, unless vacated by the City Council. Under special circumstances, an existing alley may be proposed to be vacated, when extraordinary architecture and site planning result in exceptional pedestrian and vehicular circulation and public access to the proposed project and surrounding uses. The purpose of this Section is to provide guidance on the use of alleys within the Old Town Temecula. RIOTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 9 The primary purposes of the remaining alleys are either for vehicular access or pedestrian access. The primary goal of the vehicular access alleys is to provide service and rear area parking access to adjacent properties. The majority of these alleys are located between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street. The primary purposes of the pedestrian access alleys are to enhance the pedestrian connections between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek. The following alleys between Old Town Front and Mercedes Streets will retain a primarily vehicular function: . Between First and Second Streets . Between Third and Main Streets . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets . Between Fifth and Sixth Streets The following alleys between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek will retain a primary pedestrian function: . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets The locations of these alleys is shown on Exhibit IV-1. Guideline 1 - Functional Desilm for Vehicular Access Allevs The alleys designated for primary vehicular access should comply with the following criteria: . The minimum width of the alley travelway shall be at least a twenty (20) feet. . Parking spaces may back into the alleys with at least 12 feet between the centerline of the alley and the back of the parking space. . Pedestrian amenities may be provided along the vehicular access alleys when the use of the alley for vehicular access is not impaired or restricted. . Additional landscaping may be provided but is not required along the alleys, unless adjacent to pedestrian or resident seating areas and when additional screening is determined to be necessary. . Businesses may establish patron entrances from vehicular access alleys if an area of at least six feet in width is provided to accommodate door swing and safe pedestrian movement into and out of the business. Guideline 2 - Functional Desil!n for Pedestrian Access Allevs The alleys designated for primary pedestrian access should comply with the following criteria: . Pedestrian amenities such as fountains, landscaping and seating areas should be provided when limited vehicle use is anticipated. . Businesses may take access from pedestrian alleys. . Portions of pedestrian alleys used for limited vehicular access should conform to the requirements for vehicular access alleys." R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04~0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 10 I .. ~ ~Allofly'S to be Retained S1lJdV Area ^I HighwoiYS ~.. 'Dpareeli -- --I Old Town T emecula Specific Plan Exhibit IV-1 Alleys /1 " ,. ;.. ;.. ...ft'll --- ~ R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmenlsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 11 18. Amend Section V to read as follows: "V. TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT CONTENTS A. Purpose B. Establishment of the District C. Building Permits and Prohibitions D. Otd Town Locat Review Board (OTLRB) E. Temecula Local Historic Register F. Finding of Historic Appropriateness G. Care and Maintenance H. Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures A. PURPOSE Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town and elsewhere in Temecula is part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old Town and the protection of the community's heritage. The Old Town Specific Plan also gives owners of eligible historic properties relief from the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. Historic structures on the Temecula Local Historic Register that are located outside of Old Town Temecula are also eligible to receive relief from contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition, the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District also includes the following historic structures outside of Old Town Specific Plan: 1. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South 2. Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos 3. WolfTomb located at 45334 Maguey Court 4. Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue C. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROHIBITIONS 1. Within the boundaries of the Temecula local Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish, remove, relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed or modify any designated historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with a Finding of Historic Appropriateness. 2. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no R:IOTSP\Plan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documenlsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 12 person shall relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the Finding of Historic Appropriateness. 3. Within the boundaries of the Temecula local Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall be issued unless a Finding of Historic Appropriateness is first made in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. 4. Interior building changes to non-historic building and structures that do not affect the buildings exterior are required to obtain a building permit; however are not required to obtain a Finding of Historic Appropriateness. 5. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person from complying with any other provision of law. D. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD (OTLRB) 1. The Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall have an advisory review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan and to review any proposed modifications to any historic structure. The Director of Planning may also provide the Old Town local Review Board with information on major projects that are either: adjacent to Old Town that may have the potential to affect the Old Town area or that are adjacent to or have the potential to affect any historic structure or site. 2. The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed of five members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member). Board members shall be appointed by the City Council for terms of 3 years. The member terms shall be staggered so that all the members of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same time. All members shall exhibit an interest in and knowledge of the history and architecture of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. Members shall serve without pay. 3. The Old Town local Review Board shall hold regular public meetings and establish such rules as may be appropriate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman (who will officiate the meetings when the Chairman is absent), who shall serve for terms of one year. 4. The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a. Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. The purpose of these conferences R:\OTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 13 shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes of the district. b. For historic structures within Old Town Temecula, utilize the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in the review of applications as part of process to make determinations of consistency and appropriateness with the Specific Plan. Use the Design Guidelines as a basis for approving or denying applications for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness. For historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula, utilize the best available information for the architectural style of the historic structure to maintain the integrity of existing historic architecture as well as preserve its local historic context. c. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to appropriate legislation and financing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. d. Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the T emecula Local Historic District, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. e. Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, or maintenance of any structure, natural feature, site or area within the district. f. Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and interpretative programs. E. TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER 1. The City Council has identified the following historic buildings and structures in Temecula. These buildings and structures are officially designated on the Local Historic Register for the City of Temecula. All buildings on this list are eligible to receive any and all benefits authorized by the State of California for designated historic structures. The use of the Historic Building Code is specifically authorized for all historic structures. (The dates for the historic structures are approximate based upon the best available information.) 2. The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures is provided below. The locations of the designated historic buildings and structures in Old Town Temecula are shown on Exhibit V-1. Non-Old Town sites are shown on Exhibit V-2. R:IOTSPIPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\60rdlnance Exhibit A2.doc 14 A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. a. Structures in Old Town Temecula Saint Catherine's Church, 1920 Welty Building, 1897 Machado Store, 1910 Clogstone Restaurant, 1932 First National Bank, 1914 Palomar Hotel, 1915 Alec Escallier House, 1927-28 Burnham Store, 1902 Friedeman Meat Market, 1901 Welty Hotel, 1891 J.D. Welty, 1936 Arviso House, 1920 Unnamed residence, 1928 Bill Friedeman House, 1922 Nienke House, 1936 McConville House, early 1890's Albert Nienke House, early 1920's GA Burnham House, early 1880's AI Otto House, 1882 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 28676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 Main Street 42100 Main Street 42081 3rd Street 41915 4th Street 42251 6th Street 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28653 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street b. Structures outside of Old Town Temecula Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex 32095 Highway 79-South (formerly addressed as 32100) 31658 Via San Carlos 45334 Maguey Court 27645 Jefferson Avenue Vail Ranch House WOlfTomb,1887 Gonzalez Adobe, 1879 R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documenlsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 15 '11 Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit V-1 Historic Structures Map A SalOl Caherifle's Church 1920 B Welly8ulldlllg.1897 C MachadoSlore,1910 o ClogstonaReSlauranl.1932 E First National Bmk, 1914 F Palomar Hctel, 1915 G Alec EscallrerHou,>e 191728 H B.Jrnham S1on~, 1002' I. FlIl}demanMeatMarkAt.1f01 J, W~lyHoloj 1891 K J.DWtllty,1936 L ArvrsOHQuse.1920 M unnamed fl'lSldence. 1928 N Bill Frieoeman House, 1922 o NlenkeHoose,1936 P McCollvllle House. eiJ'ly' 1890's o AlbertNienkeHouse,91;ll'ly1920's R G A Burnham HOI,se, eiJ"1y 1880's -". " D. . ~oo 0 ~- "" roOf.., r"'.....m\o"'''G....-'."s\O''"....._s_.'''''~<_".,''''",.. .W 3. The following historic structures in Old Town Temecula have been moved from their original locations. Saint Catherine's Church building (Historic Building "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Freideman House (Historic Building "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part of housing project sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\60rdlnance Exhibit A2.doc 16 EXHIBIT V-2 / / ,';,\,. Historic Sites Outside of Old Town ',,::!~~~ .' ,"~"O,"05 r I ,~.:f ( / . " \. "',1 1-"" <"" /~, y, >.,,<<- / ',',.--;1.:\./"" I y." , \ ,-,,~: ;):~'(~,,~~~~\~;;i~"~i/; " " \ .; in ! ..... J- .. ["''''''''"-. 'I' ,'.:- " \ '. \ ;!, c., ., (""~~;~r'~V': .. \.-' .' .. .\ ,::-:.':;~::-r:,\ /,"".. ,';' \ ',-/ <) e ,/. ~/' '~ ,/\~ ;..\- " i , :,,;~,~~} ~~', .' ,1 ;'.,1: ( 1 i ~/- -~ ,':::< . ,^, \" \ / '< 'I .,'>( ", ~~~<'~1~' /~::~:':" , " \ '/' \ .' \ ,-.';, /f< ',I ~', \ 'Ii:!.") \ . 4 ~., ,\.~" '" \:.~' " " I \''','' --- ~ . /"\-::. ''''\ ~~ ,>-~ '''" " '\~ ',J~.f \"~:i ., ( \' ( "\ '\ .:\ rl-:-.:......,,,~ '~ .. \ i i I (' ,~, i \ ( \ 'f. , .:,' \..,,,/ \~, '>- c' ~:,/ /..;,.'!':""""_;./)' l" ,'," .\ ;> ...... ....___..,.~...........Ilo...... ~,':.":..::.~~~~ ........-.........-"'-- =:=..::.=.-:.-'"::.::::"'...:.... .....-.--..........- ...-..-....-........."'- -Q.o..........-.........-.... -,----"......_~- . "b~..IOllt< -~I.U " . ~"'\ CoSO Lema ". ~ <. -'- > ;t(V~ eattf. rt."clt.) H_IIt,.. ,'1,1; :'~'~:>~~,! ',.' '., ':' ' . Wolf +<lm~ -t", ,> r" ., .r' ( "-,>h~ ~'/' \ '., ,'r ~.~ / " . )/~ ',../ ), c, I ' ':J/ " ~" ;' """ "'$I ..... \1 \11 ...-........,-.........- 0" 4. Additions and removals of structures on the Historic Structures Map shall be at the direction of the Director of Planning upon all requirements for said removal or addition being completed. 5. Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, a number of previously designated historic structures in Old Town Temecula were determined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was determined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The following is a list of designated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's initial adoption 1994. This listing has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. a. Harry Walters House, 1930's, 28535 Pujol Street Removed in 1996 R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 17 b. Unnamed residence, 1920, 28735 Pujol Street Removed in 1999 c. Knott's Garage, 1910,28545 Old Town Front Street Removed in 2000 d. Angel Ramirez House, 1926, 28731 Pujol Street Removed in 2002 e. Fred Ramirez House, 1920, 28725 Pujol Street Removed in 2002 F. FINDING OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS 1. No existing building or structure may be altered or demolished, and no new building or structure constructed without a Finding of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section prior to the alteration or demolition. The Finding shall be incorporated into the review and approval process for the requested change. 2. Finding of Historic Appropriateness within Old Town Temecula may be issued either by the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The approval authority for Finding of Historical Appropriateness shall be based upon the approval authority established by the Development Code for the accompanying application. No development application for level Two projects in Old Town, as described below, may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town Local Review Board. 3. Finding of Historic Appropriateness for structures located outside of the Old Town Specific Plan may be approved by the Director of Planning for Level One projects and by the Planning Commission for level Two projects. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and provide comments on all requests to alter any historic structure. 4. For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan and the requirements of the Temecula local Historic Preservation District, there are two levels of Old Town development project. The first category is the ministerial or minor projects, referred to as Level One projects. The second category is for non-ministerial and major projects, also called Level Two projects. a. level One Proiects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved by administrative (staff only) review following the Director of Planning's determination to grant a Finding of Historical Appropriateness. Typical examples include the following: . Interior alterations to historic structures; . Re-Iandscaping around existing structure; . Re-roofing of an existing building; . Additions and remodels to non-historic single family residences; R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 18 . Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building effecting less than 25% of the front or street side exterior facade; . The demolition to non-historic buildings and structures; New individual signs up to 12 square feet in size; and . Changes in the copy of previously approved signs. The Director of Planning, at his/her sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when unique circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. b. Level Two Proiects have the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town Local Review Board prior to action by the approving authority. Typical examples of Level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the following: . Multi-family residential projects; . New commercial and office projects; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the front or street side exterior facade is affected: . The alteration to a designated historic structure; . The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planning Commission approval); . New individual signs over 12 square feet; Mini-monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement of four feet; and, . The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. 5. All applications shall be tiled in a manner determined by the Director of Planning. Requests for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall not be accepted unless they are accompanied by the appropriate filing fee and such information and drawings as may be required by the Director of Planning. All applications for Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be signed by either the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner. All drawings shall be signed by the architect responsible for the design and must be in sufficient detail to show the proposed design for the site. This includes the architectural design and elevations (including signs), proposed materials, textures and colors (including material samples), and the site layout (including all improvements affecting appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other similar elements). 6. Following the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting of the Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy of the site R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 19 plan and elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or deny, with or without conditions, any requests for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness to the approval authority designated by the Development Code. 7. In considering requests for Findings of Historic Appropriateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the following findings: a. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. b. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a designated historic building or structure, the Board shall also be required to find that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectively repaired or retrofitted. 8. The expiration date for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanying planning application, as may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specify an expiration date, the project for which the Finding of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three years of the date of approval or the Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall become null and void. No extensions of time will be allowed for these projects. G. MAINTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner, occupant, or other person in actual charge of an building or structure on Temecula Local Historic Register shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement, building, or structure, all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified in the designation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothing in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any designated Temecula Local Historic Register building of structure that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance thereof. R:\OTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 20 H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES 1. In addition to the general violation provisions in Section III.H.7 of the Specific Plan, any person who demolishes, alters or removes a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the building, site, or structure to its original condition and setting prior to the violation within ninety days. Any action to enforce this provision may be brought by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided by law. 2 If any person demolishes or removes a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register in violation of this section, no building or construction related (including grading) permits or permits to use the property as a parking area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City Council's discretion, based on the significance of the resource from the date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a designated historic building or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or structure on the Temecula local Historic Register. For the purpose of this section, the demolition shall be presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providing an earlier date, if entitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affirmative obligations to plant and maintain turf grass, to provide a temporary irrigation system to maintain such landscaping, and prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property during the interim period." R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplementa' Clean-uplPC Documentsl60rdinance Exhibit A2.doc 21 ATTACHMENT NO.2 REDlINE/STRIKE-OUT REVISIONS TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl1Staff Report 2.doc 7 PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (New text is shown like this, deletions are shown like this tms.) Medium and Hiah Densitv Residential Plannina Area 1. Amend second paragraph in Subsection III.C as follows: "Permitted uses for the Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), and Open Space (OS) Planning Areas shall be the same as identified in the Development Code for the Medium Density Residential, High Density Residential and Opens Space/Conservation zones, respectively, as periodically amended, except that "for profit museums" shall also be conditionally permitted in the Medium Density and High Density Residential Planning Areas." Mixed Use Proiects 1 Amend portion of Table 11I-1 by adding "Mixed Use Projects" to the list of uses and footnote number 6 as follows: LIst OF USES . TABLE 11I-1 "AND USE MATRIX HT rOTe. I TRCI cc M Mixed Use Projects · I P I I I P I 6. Individual uses within each mixed use project shall be determined by this Land Use I Matrix. 2. Delete Subsection III.F.3.b as follows: "Condjtional U~e Pe_jt Require. P-. milled use prajeGt may only be established after fir-st obtaining a Conditional Use Permit, 3:'0 t!esGFibe:! ::: ~he Development Code, and in Gonte_anGe with the requirements of this seGtion." 3. Amend Subsection III.F.3.c.vi. as follows: "If onsite resident parking is provided, One parking space per residential unit shall be provided on site and screened from public view. If this parking requirement cannot be met, then the applicant may petition the Director of Planning to accept an "in lieu" parking fee in an amount set by resolution of the City Council. Acceptance of an "in-lieu" parking fee is at the discretion of the Director of Planning. Separate access drives and parking facilities should be provided for residential uses and commercial uses whenever possible." R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc Allevs 1. Add a new Subsection III. F .15 to read as follows: "15. Alleys Designated alleys within Old Town shall be maintained and protected for future public use. The design and components within each alley shall be consistent with the purpose identified within this Specific Plan. Development projects adjacent to the designated alleys will be required to construct improvements in and adjacent to the alley. These improvements shall include paving, lighting, or other necessary components to ensure the functionality and safety of the designated alleys. Limited landscaping shall be provided when feasible, provided that the functionality of the alley is not affected. When resident or business parking is established in the rear yard areas adjacent to the alleys, access to these parking spaces may be provided direclly from to the alleys." 2. Amend Subsection III.F.7 by adding an additional sentence: "7. loading Facilities loading and unloading facilities shall be visually screened from access streets and adjacent properties and constructed in a manner to reasonably contain and restrict emission of noises typically attributed to such function. When screening of loading and unloading facilities is physically not possible, the facilities shall be architecturally integrated into the overall design of the building. Loading and unloading areas in or adjacent to the alleys do not require additional visual screening. " 3. Amend Section IV by adding a new Subsection L to read as follows: "L. ALLEY GUIDELINES The alleys in Old Town Temecula were originally created with the original plat and subdivision in the 1880's. Since that time, many of the alleys have been eliminated. As part of the revitalization efforts in Old Town, it has been determined that the remaining alleys should be preserved and integrated into the Specific Plan, unless vacated by the City Council. Under special circumstances, an existing alley may be proposed to be vacated, when extraordinary architecture and site planning result in exceptional pedestrian and vehicular circulation and public access to the proposed project and surrounding uses. The purpose of this Section is to provide guidance on the use of alleys within the Old Town Temecula. The primary purposes of the remaining alleys are either for vehicular access or pedestrian access. The primary goal of the vehicular access alleys is to provide service and rear area parking access to adjacent properties. The majority of these alleys are located between Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street. The primary purposes of the pedestrian access alleys are to enhance the pedestrian connections between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek. R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 2 The following alleys between Old Town Front and Mercedes Streets will retain a primarily vehicular function: . Between First and Second Streets . Between Third and Main Streets . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets . Between Fifth and Sixth Streets The following alleys between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek witt retain a primary pedestrian function: . Between Fourth and Fifth Streets The locations of these alleys are shown on Exhibit IV-1. Guideline 1 - Functional Desian for Vehicular Access Allevs The alleys designated for primary vehicular access should comply with the following criteria: . The minimum width of the alley travelway shall be at least a twenty (20) feet. . Parking spaces may back into the alleys with at least 12 feet between the centerline of the alley and the back of the parking space. . Pedestrian amenities may be provided along the vehicular access alleys when the use of the alley for vehicular access is not impaired or restricted. . Additional landscaping may be provided but is not required along the alleys, unless adjacent to pedestrian or resident seating areas and when additional screening is determined to be necessary. . Businesses may establish patron entrances from vehicular access alleys if an area of at least six feet in width is provided to accommodate door swing and safe pedestrian movement into and out of the business. Guideline 2 - Functional Desian for Pedestrian Access Allevs The alleys designated for primary pedestrian access should comply with the following criteria: . Pedestrian amenities such as fountains, landscaping and seating areas should be provided when limited vehicle use is anticipated. . Businesses may take access from pedestrian alleys. . Portions of pedestrian alleys used for limited vehicular access should conform to the requirements for vehicular access alleys. " RIOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 3 ~ Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit IV-1 Alleys ~ ~ ~AIIeY$ to' b~ Reblned StudyAru ~ ~Hi9hwa~ ~.. L P"". - l1 . -- Jo. ,.. ~. .... l'<<t -..........-..iiI R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 4 Exoansion of the Historic Provisions beyond Old Town Temecula 1. Make the following changes to Section V. "V. OLD TO'NN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT CONTENTS A. Purpose B. Establishment of the District C. Building Permits and Prohibitions D. Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) E. Old Town Temecula Local Historic Register F. CertifiGate Finding of Historic Appropriateness G. Care and Maintenance H. Additional Violation Provisions for Historic Structures A. PURPOSE Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Page V-X Protecting the cultural heritage and historical architectural resources found in Old Town and elsewhere in Temecula is part of the overall goal for the revitalization of Old Town and the protection of the community's heritage. The Old Town Specific Plan also gives owners of eligible historic properties relief from the contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. Historic structures on the Temecula Local Historic Register that are located outside of Old Town Temecula are also eligible to receive relief from contemporary municipal codes, ordinances, taxes, and laws levied on newer contemporary structures. B. ESTABLISHMENT OF THE DISTRICT The boundary of the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall be coterminous with the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan. In addition, the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District also includes the following historic structures outside of Old Town Specific Plan: 1. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex located at 32095 Highway 79 South 2. Vail Ranch House located at 31658 Via San Carlos 3. Wolf Tomb located at 45334 Maguey Court 4. Gonzalez Adobe located at 27645 Jefferson Avenue R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 5 C. BUILDING PERMITS AND PROHIBITIONS 1. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District no person shall demolish, remove, relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed or modify any designated historic building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with without the issuance of a Finding Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. 2-. '."!ithin the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person :5:~z.. .lIter, or cause to be altered, any designated historic building or structure, e~l:ept in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the 'ssl:Zl1ce of a Certificate of Historic .'\ppropriateness. ~2. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Historic Preservation District, no person shall relocate, or cause to be relocated, alter, or cause to be altered, construct, or cause to be constructed, any building or structure, except in strict compliance with the plans approved in conjunction with the issuance of a Cortificate Finding of Historic Appropriateness. 4,3. Within the boundaries of the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, no building permit shall be issued unless a Finding Certificate of Historic Appropriateness is first made issued in compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. ~. Interior building changes to non-historic building and structures that do not affect the buildings exterior are required to obtain a building permit; however are not required to obtain a Finding Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. &.-5. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to exempt any person from complying with any other provision of law. D. OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD (OTLRB) 1. The Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District shall have an advisory review board known as the Old Town Local Review Board to provide input into all major projects within the Old Town Specific Plan and to review any proposed modifications to any historic structure. The Director of Planning may also provide the Old Town Local Review Board with information on major projects that are either: adjacent to Old Town that may have the potential to affect the Old Town area or that are adjacent to or have the potential to affect any historic structure or site. 2. The Old Town Local Review Board shall be composed of five members and one alternate (who shall serve in the absence of any member). Board members shall be appointed by the City Council for terms of 3 years. The member terms shall be staggered so that all the members of the Old Town Local Review Board are not appointed at the same time. All members shall exhibit an interest in and knowledge of the history and architecture of the QlG-l9wf'l Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. At least one member shall be knowledgeable in architectural and construction techniques. Members shall serve without pay. R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-GS96 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 6 3. The Old Town Local Review Board shall hold regular public meetings and establish such rules as may be appropriate or necessary for the orderly conduct of its business. Three members shall constitute a quorum. At its first meeting of the year, the Board members shall elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman (who will officiate the meetings when the Chairman is absent), who shall serve for terms of one year. 4. The Old Town Local Review Board shall have the following powers and duties in addition to those otherwise provided in this ordinance: a. Provide for pre-application conferences with individuals interested in constructing or altering property within the Old Town Temecula Local Historic Preservation District. The purpose of these conferences shall be to familiarize the applicant with the historic significance and related architectural themes of the district. b. For historic structures within Old Town Temecula, utilize the adopted Old Town Specific Plan Design Guidelines in the review of applications as part of process to make findings of consistency and appropriateness with the Specific Plan. Use the Design Guidelines as a basis for approving or denying applications for a Finding CertifiGate of Historic Appropriateness. For historic structures outside of Old Town Temecula, utilize the best available information for the architectural style of the historic structure to maintain the integrity of existing historic architecture as well as preserve its local historic context. c. Explore means for the protection, retention, and use of any significant structures, natural features, sites, and areas in the district including but not limited to appropriate legislation and financing by independent funding organizations, or other private, local, state, or federal assistance. d. Serve as an advisory resource to all agencies of the City in matters pertaining to the Temecula Local Historic District, and to encourage efforts by, and cooperation with individuals, private organizations, and other governmental agencies concerned with preservation of the district's architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage. e. Render advice and guidance, upon request of the property owner or occupant regarding construction, restoration, alteration, decoration, landscaping, or maintenance of any structure, natural feature, site or area within the district. f. Encourage public understanding and appreciation of the unique architectural, environmental, and cultural heritage of the district through educational and interpretative programs. E. OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL HISTORIC REGISTER 1. The City Council has identified the following historic buildings and structures in Temecula. the Old Town ar-ea. These buildings and structures are officially designated on the Local Historic Register for the City of Temecula. All buildings RIOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-Q596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 7 on this list are eligible to receive any and all benefits authorized by the State of California for designated historic structures. The use of the Historic Building Code is specifically authorized for aft historic structures. (The dates for the historic structures are approximate based upon the best available information.) 2. The list of Designated Historic Buildings and Structures is as follows provided below. The locations of the designated historic buildings and structures in Old Town Temecula are shown on Exhibit V-1. Non-Old Town sites are shown on Exhibit V-2. a. Structures in Old Town Temecula A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. Saint Catherine's Church, 1920 Welty Building, 1897 Machado Store, 1910 Clogstone Restaurant, 1932 First National Bank, 1914 Palomar Hotel, 1915 Alec Escallier House, 1927-28 Burnham Store, 1902 Friedeman Meat Market, 1901 Welty Hotel, 1891 J.D. Welty, 1936 Arviso House, 1920 Unnamed residence, 1928 Bill Friedeman House, 1922 Nienke House, 1936 McConville House, early 1890's Albert Nienke House, early 1920's GA Burnham House, early 1880's AI Otto House, 1882 28314 Mercedes Street 28659 Old Town Front Street 28656 Old Town Front Street 28676 Old Town Front Street 28645 Old Town Front Street 28522 Old Town Front Street 41852 Main Street 42051 Main Street 42050 Main Street 421 DO Main Street 42081 3rd Street 41915 4th Street 42251 6th Street 42291 6th Street 28575 Pujol Street 28585 Pujol Street 28649 Pujol Street 28653 Pujol Street 28717 Pujol Street b. Structures outside of Old Town Temecula Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex Vail Ranch House Wolf Tomb, 1887 Gonzalez Adobe, 1879 32095 Highway 79-South (formerly addressed as 32100) 31658 Via San Carlos 45334 Maguey Court 27645 Jefferson Avenue RIOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 8 ~ Old Town Temecula Specific Plan Exhibit V-l Historic Structures Map ",\\\ ", \ \ "",\ " A S<llntCif.llerine's01urch.1920 8 Welty Bulldmg, 1897 C Ms<:hadoStore,1910 o ClogstoneReslaurent,1932 E FirstNationalBIiIlk,1914 f' PalomarHOlel,191'3 (, AlecEscalherHouse,l927-28 H B.JrnhamSlore,l9J2 ,. FflademaoMeal:Markst,19Jl J WaltyHotel.1891 K JDWelty.1936 l ArvlsoHouse 1920 M U1na~dfeSidence, 1928 N BII Fnedomen House. N22 o NienkeHoosliI,1936 P McConllllla House, eat)' 1890's Q Albert NIElnke House, eer1y 1920'~ R G Po. B.Jmham House. e<'Sty 1880's S AIOlloH:lusa 1882 " )l ~ ." .. 1Il0 Fut , '\g....en'\o'<"<"l''''I<cl.Ictdl......_6_h..lon<_..'''''~,<. ...' 3. The following historic structures in Old Town Temecula have been moved from their original locations. Saint Catherine's Church building (Historic Building "A") was relocated to Sam Hicks Monument Park in 1992. The Bill Freideman House (Historic Building "0") was relocated on the same site in 2003 as part of housing project sponsored by the City Redevelopment Agency. 4. Additions and removals of structures on the Historic Structures Map shall be at the direction of the Director of Planning upon all requirements for said removal or addition being completed R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 9 / / EXHIBIT V-2 Historic Sites Outside of Old Town hlgust30,2005 ,- I. \--;~ \,1/-1 I:.: ?" r+~ , " ',I '"",- " \ \ ~_~~~~i~~.A( ~) . \ '\ \ \ \-'- \ ,,,,,", If. \ ~""'/'" ,.~ -~.(., //, "" ~ ,'-\t, , . \\ '\ ,',' , ' \ \ \ \~t, ~.....",\ \\'" 'I' (' ',i\,. \ __.J / j" .;. /' '"cJ. ' / C \//\ ',..., "-,. .,;,_n_' > _~:,,-- // " t.! G ...,--...........................- :-;''t.':;a-:..~.:.:=::==- .......-..-.....-"'-- ..-""'............-..--... -......-....-- ...,,-.---"'....-.. ..._~~...'r._-................'" - -............ _._u_"....._._ ",,--.-"-...-...-.. , r \ , , " \.... i, ,)'-:^ ", '; \. X"~'~:'';. :'(.\' ->~ ~\,' ,(., ,,,, ~ '1; .. -" II ,:~r~.., '. r:J '__'{"f/I, :: ~~':~(r5' f.;~ - " ">\ II' ~ , , \ , "\ , '~: I . .,' ,',r""' !....."..... ..' /-/V'~~~:\:~ .0:"'" ~,",'F j . -. ..,i~:,f . , ""';:,;:,,(; , '".\ Col:llIIl_. "-'" ....7'\" ~'/ ,~~_ttl. R_h) ~~.~-.'~'.,i_\,'-,"';--~: !>--<< i.~jL{5~,~!;,::';<ii~~':~Z\ " ',) , '(~,~::i,~,~<,;?'" i /'- . -;V " ',1/ '-,^, // "-". ./'( '" >-- . "'~lo:Ilt:Il!, -11I:I1..... ---,*... D~ 43. Since the initial adoption of the Old Town Specific Plan, a number of previously designated historic structures in Old Town Temecula were determined to be substantially dilapidated and/or unsafe and it was determined that these historic structures could not be rehabilitated. The following is a list of designated historic structures that were demolished since the Plan's initial adoption 1994. This listing has been provided for historic documentation purposes only. a. Harry Walters House, 1930's, 28535 Pujol Street Removed in 1996 b. Unnamed residence, 1920,28735 Pujol Street Removed in 1999 c. Knott's Garage, 1910,28545 Old Town Front Street Removed in 2000 d. Angel Ramirez House, 1926,28731 Pujol Street Removed in 2002 e. Fred Ramirez House, 1920,28725 Pujol Street Removed in 2002 R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 10 F. CERTIFICATE FINDING OF HISTORIC APPROPRIATENESS 1. No existing designated historic building or structure may be altered or demolished, and no new building or structure constructed without a the pROf' approval of Finding a CertifiGate of Historic Appropriateness pursuant to the provisions of this Section prior to the alteration or demolition. The Finding shall be incorporated into the review and approval process for the requested change. 2. CertifiGates A Finding of Historic Appropriateness within Old Town Temecula may be issued either by the Director of Planning or the Planning Commission or City Council as part of the approval process for any development within the Old Town Specific Plan. The approval authority for a determination of '....ho approves the Certifisates Finding of Historical Appropriateness shall be based upon the approval authority established by the Development Code for the accompanying application. No development application for Level Two projects in Old Town, as described below, may be approved without a recommendation from the Old Town local Review Board. 3. CertifiGates A Finding of Historic Appropriateness for structures located outside of the Old Town Specific Plan may be approved by the Director of Planning for Level One projects and by the Planning Commission for Level Two projects. The Old Town Local Review Board shall review and provide comments on all requests to alter any historic structure. 4. For the purposes of implementing the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan and the requirements of the Temecula Local Historic Preservation District, there are two levels of Old Town development projects. The first category is the ministerial or minor projects, referred to as Level One projects. The second category is for non-ministerial and major projects, also called level Two projects. a. Level One Proiects do not require the review and recommendation of the Old Town Local Review Board. Level One projects may be approved by administrative (staff only) review following the Director of Planning's determination to grant a Finding Certifisate of Historical Appropriateness. Typical examples include the following: . Interior Ghan!les or alterations to historic structures; . Re-Iandscaping around existing structure; Re-roofing of an existing building; . Additions and remodels to non-historic single family residences; Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building affecting less than 25% of the front or street side exterior facade; . The demolition to non-historic buildings and structures; . New individual signs up to 12 square feet in size; and . Changes in the copy of previously approved signs. The Director of Planning, at his/her theil'-sole discretion, may forward Level One projects to the Old Town Local Review Board when unique circumstances, or the sensitivity of adjacent historic structures or land uses indicate the potential for an adverse aesthetic impact. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean~up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 11 b. Level Two Proiects have the potential for significant aesthetic impacts. Level Two Projects shall always require review by the Old Town local Review Board prior to action by the approving authority. Typical examples of level Two projects include, but are not limited to, the following: . Multi-family residential projects; . New commercial and office projects; . Exterior architectural modifications to an existing commercial, office, or residential building when 25% or more of the front or street side exterior facade is affected; . The alteration to a designated historic structure; . The demolition of, or substantial alteration to, a designated historic structure (requires Planning Commission approval); . New individual signs over 12 square feet; . Mini-monument signs located on architectural features that exceed the standard height requirement of four feet; and, . The removal of a specimen oak tree with a 10 inches or greater trunk diameter. 5. All applications shall be filed an the faFms and in a manner determined by the Director of Planning. Requests for a Finding of Historic Appropriateness !\llllliGatians shall not be accepted unless they are accompanied by the appropriate filing fee and such information and drawings as may be required by the Director of Planning. All applications for CertifiGates a Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be signed by either the owner of the property or a person authorized by the owner. All drawings shall be signed by the architect responsible for the design and must be in sufficient detail to show the proposed design for the site. This includes the architectural design and elevations (including signs), proposed materials, textures and colors (including material samples), and the site layout (including all improvements affecting appearances, such as walls, walks, terraces, plantings, accessory buildings, signs, lights, and other similar elements). 6. Following the receipt of a complete application, the Director of Planning shall schedule a meeting of the Old Town Local Review Board within 60 days and provide the Board with a staff report, including a copy of the site plan and elevations. The Board shall review the application material and make a recommendation to approve or deny, with or without conditions, any requests for a CertifiGates Finding of Historic Appropriateness to the approval authority designated by the Development Code. 7. In considering requests allllliGations for CertifiGates a Finding of Historic Appropriateness, the Old Town Local Review Board shall make the following findings: a. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 12 b. That the proposed structure is in conformance with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan, including the goals, objectives and policies, and architectural guidelines and standards. c. In the event of the proposed demolition of a designated historic building or structure, the Board shall also be required to find that applicant has submitted substantial evidence that the structure is imminently dangerous or unsafe and that the structure can not be effectively repaired or retrofitted. 8. The expiration date for a Certificates Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall be the same as expiration date for the accompanying planning application, as may be extended pursuant to the provisions of the Development Code. If the Development Code does not specify an expiration date, the project for which the Certificates Finding of Historic Appropriateness was approved shall commence construction within three years of the date of approval or the Certificates Finding of Historic Appropriateness shall become null and void. No extensions of time will be allowed for these projects. G. MAINTENANCE AND CARE 1. The owner, occupant, or other person in actual charge of an building or structure on Temecula Local Historic Register shall keep in good repair all of the exterior portions of such improvement, building, or structure, all of the interior portions thereof when subject to control as specified in the designation statement, and all interior portions thereof whose maintenance is necessary to prevent deterioration and decay of any exterior architectural feature. 2. Nothing in the requirements of section shall be construed to prevent the ordinary maintenance or repair of any exterior architectural feature in or on any designated Temecula Local Historic Register building of structure that does not involve a change in design, material, or external appearance thereof. H. ADDITIONAL VIOLATION PROVISIONS FOR HISTORIC STRUCTURES 1. In addition to the general violation provisions in Section III.H.7 of the Specific Plan, any person who demolishes, alters or removes a building or structure on the Temecula local Historic Register, that person and the owner shall be required to restore the building, site, or structure to its original condition and setting prior to the violation within ninety days. Any action to enforce this provision may be brought by the city or any other interested party. This civil remedy shall be in addition to, any criminal prosecution and penalty and any other remedy provided by law 2. If any person demolishes or removes aR building or structure on the Temecula local Historic Register in violation of this section, no building or construction related (including grading) permits or permits to use the property as a parking area or other commercial venture shall be issued for a period of up to seven years, at the City Council's discretion, based on the significance of the resource from the date of demolition, except to replicate the lost resource. The failure to adequately maintain a designated historic building or structure can also be considered to constitute the unauthorized demolition of a building or structure on the Temecula Local Historic Register. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 13 For the purpose of this section, the demolition shall be presumed to have occurred on the date the city has actual knowledge of the demolition. The owner shall have the burden of providing an earlier date, if entitlement to an earlier date is claimed. The owner shall have the affirmative obligations to plant and maintain turf grass, to provide a temporary irrigation system to maintain such landscaping, and to prevent the accumulation of debris and waste on the property during the interim period." Sion Standards - 1. Make the following changes to the Sign Standards in Section III. "G. SIGN REGULATIONS The intent of these regulations is to establish specific standards for all exterior signage that will ensure continuity, consistency, and harmony with the architectural quality of the Old Town environment as it may have appeared in the early 1900's. 1. Applicability These regulations shall apply to all signage within the Tourist Retail Core and Tourist Serving Residential areas of the Specific Plan. Signage within the Highway Tourist Commercial District, Community Commercial, Medium Density Residential District, and High Density Residential Land Use Districts shall comply with the sign requirements contained in the Development Code and the Signage Design Guidelines contained in Section IV.J of the Specific Plan. 2. Permit Required Unless specifically stated in these regulations, a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Specific Plan. 3. Prohibitions No person shall erect, re-erect, construct, enlarge, alter, move, improve, remove, convert, or equip any sign or sign structure or cause or permit the same to be done contrary to, or in violation of, the provisions of these sign regulations. All signs not expressly permitted by this Section are prohibited. No application for sign permit or other application for a prohibited sign shall be accepted, acted upon, or approved. 4. Prohibited Signs in Old Town o Freestanding signs on lots with less than 150' of road frontage (except for mini monument signs) o Roof mounted signs o Animated signs, including time and temperature displays o Rotating, moving, emitting, or flashing signs o Balloon signs o Ambient air balloons o Internally illuminated signs, including front and back lit awning and window locations R\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 14 o Neon tube signs o Window signs above the second story o Paper, cloth, or plastic streamers or bunting - except holiday decorations o Formed plastic or injection molded signs o Statues used for advertising o Traffic sign replicas o Vehicle signs o Any sign not permitted by this Specific Plan o Any sign prohibited by the Development Code and not expressly permitted in this Specific Plan 5. Permitted Signs o Mini-monument Signs (for buildings constructed before 1994) o Wall Mounted Signs (business identification) o Hanging Signs o Rear and Interior Facing Signs o Supergraphics o Freestanding Signs n Window Signs o Under Canopy Signs o Awning Signs o Projecting Signs o Indirectly Illuminated Signs o Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs o Accessory Signs (examples include building name, directional, menu board, and daily special signs) o Painted Building Signs (The appropriate location is at the discretion of the Director of Planning) 6. Sign Standards a. Allowable Sign Area. Unless specifically exempted for this requirement, the total amount of signage for each business shall be limited to the following. i. Business establishments having a single frontage onto a public street, creekside or buildings with one building. entrance, are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of sign per linear foot of business establishment frontage. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section. ii. Business establishments that have frontage onto two public streets are permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of per linear foot of business establishment frontage along the primary street and 0.5 square feet of sign area per linear foot of business establishment frontage along the secondary street. Business establishments that have frontage along the Murrieta Creek shall also be permitted a maximum of 1.5 square feet of sign per linear foot of business establishment R:IOTSPIPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 15 along the creek frontage. Each business may use any combination of the following signs to arrive at the total allowable square footage. However, each sign shall not exceed the maximum square footage described in this Section. b. Buildina Surface Sians. Except as specified below, all building surface signage shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. i. Wall Mounted Sians. Maximum of one square foot per linear frontage foot of business establishment. To be located no higher than the lowest of the following points: . 25 feet above grade; . Bottom of the sill line of the second floor windows; or . Cornice line of the building. ii. Hanaina Sians. As an alternative to the standard wall sign, an under canopy hanging sign may be used. Hanging signs must be parallel to the street and, in addition hanging signs may not exceed 75% of the width of the business frontage or be more than 12 inches in height. If located over a walkway, the vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade shall be a minimum of 7 feet. iii. Rear Facin!, Sians. If a building has parking or pedestrian access at the rear, each business is permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 3 square feet. The rear facing sign can either be located adjacent to the entry point, or on the exterior rear facing wall of the business. iv. Interior Facina. Sians. Where a building has a courtyard or interior plaza that can not be viewed from the public right of way, each business shall be permitted a maximum of one sign, not to exceed 5 percent of the total interior courtyard wall area of the business. Interior facing signage shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. v. Suoeraraohics. The purpose of allowing wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. A supergraphic is a mosaic, mural, painting, graphic art, or combination thereof which is professionally applied to a building that does not contain any brand name, product name, letters of the alphabet spelling or abbreviating the name of any product, company, profession, or business, or any logo, trademark, trade name, or other commercial message. Maximum size shall not exceed 60 percent of wall surface. Supergraphics shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 16 c. Other Buildino Sions. All window, awning and projecting signs shall be counted toward the maximum allowable sign area. i. Permanent Window Siqns. On ground level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent of the total window and door area visible from the exterior of the building; on second level: coverage shall not exceed 30 percent per window. (No window signs are permitted above second floor). ii. Awnino Siqns. On ground floor level: coverage shall not exceed 20 percent mallimum Go':erage alloweEl of the total exterior surface area of each awning. On the second floor level and above: coverage shall not exceed 10 percent maximum Gover-age alle'NeEl of the total exterior surface area of each awning. Internal illumination prohibited. !i . - .,., ..._--_. l ' ..~:,"-~",lt~#J,~;;_:;~-:::::":~~i~ "-J iii. Proiectina Sians. One per business allowed; maximum size may not exceed 6 square feet and shall not extend more than 4 feet from the wall surface. No nlumination is not allowed. Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings, not to poles or other signs, and shall maintain at least 7 feet of vertical clearance between the bottom of the sign and walking grade. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of 3 feet subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. No tenant may have both a projecting and mini-monument sign. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.doc 17 :(. 1~1q: .. --: ~RI~-:- ~ ""or The Ilo~l.lC & Card~n iv. Under CanoDv Sians. One per business allowed. Permitted under a canopy, roof, covered walkway, or porch; maximum size of 3 square feet; minimum of 7 feet of vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. A I .j , - ;l' d. Freestandina Sians. Freestanding signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. Only one freestanding sign is allowed per site. For this purpose, "site" is defined as any single parcel or a group of parcels developed under a unified development plan, whichever covers the larger area. i. Monument Multi-tenant Sions. A maximum of one double sided sign per street frontage if said street frontage is over 150 feet. Height of sign shall not exceed 6 feet above grade. Width shall not exceed 4 feet. Each tenant placard shall not exceed 12 inches in height. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated; internal R:IOTSPIPlan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 18 illumination is prohibited. No monument signs are allowed if the street frontage is less than 150 feet. ii. Mini-Monument Sians. A maximum of one double face mini- monument sign is permitted if the street frontage is less than 150 feet, if the building existed prior to 1994, and if the building is set back more that ten feet from the street. The maximum sign area shall not exceed 6 square feet. Sign may only be indirectly illuminated; internal illumination is prohibited. The height of the sign shall not exceed 4 feet. If a sign is placed on a creative, time appropriate architectural element such as a covered wagon, wagon wheel, railroad cart, etc, the height may be increased consistent with period element at the sole discretion of the Director of Planning. If a building has more than one tenant or building per lot, there shall still only be one mini-monument sign allowed. e. TemDorarv Siqns. Temporary signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. The types of temporary signs are as follows. i. Temoorarv SiGns Banners. Temporary grand opening and special event signs are allowed for each business establishment on the exterior wall. Signs shall not be attached to any other freestanding element (porch balustrade, garden wall, tree, monument sign, vehicle, etc.). Signs shall be constructed of cloth, canvas, or other durable material. Plastic or vinyl banner signs are not permitted. The use of neon colored/day glow banner signs is are also prohibited. All temporary signs, except for A- Frame/Sandwich Boards, shall abide by the provisions of the Ordinance Regulating Temporary Signs, as amended. ii. A-Frame/Sandwich Board Sian. One A-frame or sandwich board sign allowed per property on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, and designated Monday holidays. The size shall not exceed 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-frame signs shall not block the sidewalk and shall not be illuminated. No permit is required for A-frame and sandwich board signs which comply with these provisions. f. fliccessorv Siqns. Accessory signs shall not be counted toward the overall total sign area permitted for the business or building. The types of accessory signs are as follows. i. Buildinp Name Sian. The purpose of allowing building name signs is to allow for the identification of buildings. The maximum size shall not exceed 10 percent of the wall surface. In the event that the building name advertises one or more businesses located within the building, the signage will not be considered a building name sign but will be included in the total square footage permitted for the business or building. R:\OTSP\Plan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 19 ii. Directional Sians. Interior project directional signage may be allowed in interior courtyards or adjacent to stairways or elevators, to guide patrons to rear area and upstairs tenants. The maximum size may not exceed , up to 3 square feet. in size, iii. Menu Boards. One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. up--to The maximum size may not exceed 4 square feet. in ar~a, Menu Boards may contain only the name of the establishment and the food available inside. The menu board must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. Appropriate location (or menu boord sign -" M_"" loon! -' ---.c..J ---- 1:. Multi ~!::=::~ ProieG~ Si!lns. !'.ny projeGt that proposes to previde spaGe for mor-e than one tenaR~ s~lll indiGate the size and approximate leGation of all signs to be er-eGted ~~ ~",:, propert)' at the time e< ~~;~'~I ~ppliGatio~. ",'gfU !~:JII be shown on ele'Jation drawings '.vith aGGurate dimensions provided. iv. Oailv SDecial Sians. One display area size near the primary entrance is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The maximum size is 4 square feet. g. Flaqs. A maximum of three colored flags may be displayed at any one time. The maximum size is 6 square feet. These flags may not contain writing, insignias, or logos. R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentsIPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Documentsl7Redllne Strike out Changes.doc 20 Miscellaneous and Tvoocraohic Chances 1. Add the following use to the List of Uses in Table 111-1: I LIST OF USES I Day Spa TSR5 HT OTe TRe ~ ee p 2. In Table 111-1, revise footnote Number 2 to read as follows: "2 The uses are is limited to either the second floor (or higher) or to a location that does not front upon or open directly onto either non-Old Town Front Street or anll non Main Street parcel s." 3. In Section III.F.3.c, revise item iv to read as follows: "iv. Structures with heights greater than two three stories shall set back on the street frontage sides for the fourth floor portion of the structure a minimum of 1 0 feet except in cases of exceptional building-design and material quality or when the Director of Planning determines that a distance of less than 10 feet is appropriate. " 4. Amend Table 111-2 by replacing the minimum private opens space per unit in the TRC/TSR zoning district from ~ to 75 square feet per unit and by adding a footnote number 7 beside the "75 sq. ft." under the Minimum Private Open Space/Unit for the TSR/TSR Planning Area to read as follows: "7. In lieu of providing 75 square feet of private opens space per unit for mixed use projects, the amount of private open space may be reduced if combined with common private open space, as long as the total open space required for the project remains the same. " 5. Amend Table 11I-2 by modifying footnote number 3 to read as follows: "3.Buildings shall be setback exactly ten feet if no covered arcade or porch is provided at the front of the building except in cases of exceptional building-design and material quality and when the Director of Planning determines that a lesser distance will achieve the streetscape goals of this Specific Plan. " 6. Amend Table 11I-2 by modifying footnote number 6 to read as follows: "6. Landscaping of the front yard for residential projects in the TSR Planning Area is required. Limited accent landscaping shoulll shall be provided whenever possible in all other circumstances, and always between the front of the building and the public right-of-way. " R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\7Redline Strike out Changes. doc 21 7. In the Title for Section 1I1.E.3, replace the second "Cedes" with "Regulations". 8. In Section IV.B.1, add a new bullet item to the list of discouraged materials to read as follows: ". Plywood" 9. In Section IV.B.1, revise the last bullet item for Guideline 7 to read as follows: ". Rough textured vertical wood siding (suGt: z::: ;Jlyweed) with appropriately spaced wooden battens." 10. In Sections IV.B.1 and 3, replace the words "Heritage Colers" with "Preservation Exterior Palette". R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-uplPC Dacumentsl7Redline Strike out Changes.dac 22 ATTACHMENT NO.3 INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\1 Staff Report 2.doc 8 I Proiect Title I Lead Agency Name and Address I Contact Person and Phone Number Project Location I Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project Surrounding Land Uses and Setting City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (PA04-0596) City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dale West, Associate Planner, (951) 694-6400 The amendment proposes changes that effect five different locations within the City. The five locations are as follows: 1. Old Town Temecula, generally located between Rancho California Road and Santiago Road, and west of Interstate 15. 2. Vail Ranch Headquarters complex, 32095 Highway 79 South. 3. Vail Ranch House, 31658 Via San Carlos. 4. Wolf Tomb, 45334 Maguey Court. 5. Gonzalez Adobe, 27645 Jefferson Avenue. City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 1. Old Town Temecula - Community Commercial, Highway Tourist Commercial, High Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Public Institutional, and Open Space. 2. Vail Ranch Headquarters - Community Commercial. 3. Vail Ranch House - Low Medium Density Residential. 4. Wolf Tomb - Open Space. 5. Gonzalez Adobe - Community Commercial. 1. Old Town T emecula - Specific Plan. 2. Vail Ranch Headquarters - Community Commercial. 3. Vail Ranch House - Low Medium Density Residential. 4. Wolf Tomb - Open Space. 5. Gonzalez Adobe - Community Commercial. The project proposes to amend the Old Town Specific Plan by 1 )amend the mixed use project requirements to remove the requirement for a conditional use permit, reducing required private open space and requiring on-site parking for residential units; 2) to provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys; 3) to modify the sign regulations; 4) make other minor modifications and corrections; and 5) modify the historic preseNation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. (These sites are described as Locations 2 thru 5.) The project will not approve any specific development proposals and all future development proposals will receive an appropriate level of environmental review based ujlon the soecific oroject details. 1. Old Town Temecula -Community Commercial, High Density Residential, SeNice Commercial, Highway Tourist Commercial, Open Space and adjacent to Interstate 15. 2. Vail Ranch Headquarters -Community Commercial. 3. Vail Ranch House - Low Medium Density Residential and Open Space. 4. Wolf Tomb - Low Medium Density Residential. 5. Gonzalez Adobe -Community Commercial, Highway Tourist Commercial and Service Commercial. (The structure has been integrated into the Adobe Plaza Shoooinq Center.) None. I Other public agencies whose approval is required R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\lOInitial Environmental Study.doc Signature Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages, Aesthetics Aqriculture Resources Air Quality Bioloqical Resources Cultural Resources Geoloqy and Soils I Hazards and Hazardous Materials I Hydroloqy and Water Quality I Land Use and Planninq Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housinq Public Services I Recreation I Transportation/Traffic I Utilities and Service Systems I Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance I v' I None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: Iv' I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be (Jreoared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or , mitiqation measures that are imposed upon the proposed proiect, nothinq further is required. Date Dale West Printed name Citv of Temecula For R:IOTSPIPlan AmendmentslPA04.0596 Supplemental Clean.uplPC Oocumentsl10lnitial Environmental Study,doc 2 I a. b. I c, d. 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supoortina Information Sources I Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: Potentially Significant Irnaae! Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Impact v' v' less Than Significant Irnoael v' v' 1. a-d, The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment, but this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan would result in additional legal protections for these sites. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: lb. a. Issues and Suooortino Information Sources Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Aqency, to non-aqricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-aqricultural use? Potentially Significant Imeact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incarcorated No Imoact v' c. Less Than Significant Imeact v' v' R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 3 Comments: 2. a-c. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. All of the site are currently used for urban land uses or are vacant land in urban settings. None of the historic structures or areas regulated by the Oid Town Specific Plan are used for agricultural purposes and the project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: I a. b. I d. Ie. c. Issues and SupPOrtino_lntormation Sources Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorcorated No Impact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' 3. a-e. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and therefore, will not conflict with the implementation of applicable air quality plans, violate any existing or projected air quality standard, expose sensitive receptors, or create objectionable odors. Because no specific changes to the environment are proposed, no air quality impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnltial Environmental Study.doc 4 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? a, Issues and Suooortinq Information Sources Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filfinq, hydroloqical interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ~reservation I?olicy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? b. c. d. e. f. Comments: Potentially Significant lmoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' v' 4. a-f. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. When specific development projects are proposed for these areas, the potential impacts to biologic resources will be addressed as specific locations and project information is made available. The amendment to the Specific Plan proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and as a result, no impacts to biologic resources are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan, R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 5 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Issues and Su\?oortina Information SOUrces Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique qeoloQic feature? , > Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact v' b. ./ I c, I d, ./ ./ Comments: 5. a-d. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. Finally, the project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment. The project maintains the existing historic resource and architectural design guidelines for the Old Town Area. In addition, the proposal would extend local historic resource protection to four historic sites located outside of Old Town Temecula that currently have no specific legal protections. When specific development proposals on historic sites are proposed, there may be some potential that changes to the historic structures could be approved and these could result in some change or effect on the environment; however, because no specific changes are proposed to any historic structures or sites with this amendment, this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is expected to have no impact on the environment. As a result, no significant impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04.0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 6 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a. Issues and Suooortina Infonnation Sources , Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. The rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geoloqy Special Publication 42.) ii. StronQ seismic Qround shakinq? . . . Iii. Seismic-related Qround failure, includinq liquefaction? iv. Landslides? Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? I I I I b, c, d. e. Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact Less Than Significant Impact ./ ./ v' v' v' v' v' ./ 6, a-e. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula, The Temecula area, along with most of Southern California, is affected by a number of geologic conditions and hazards. These conditions and hazards affect all properties within the region, The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and will not result in any additional exposure to any of these geologic conditions. In addition, there are numerous regulations and requirements in effect already that are aimed at mitigating these potential impacts. Because the proposed amendment does not include any changes to the environment, and is not proposing new development into an area not previously affected by these conditions, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 7 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a. Issues and Suoportino Information Sources Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residinq or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinq in the protect area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? b. c. d. e. f. g. h. Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact ./ Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' v' v' ./ 7. a-h. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and will not interfere with emergency access or expose people to any additional wildland fire hazards. In addition, none of these historic sites is located within the influence area for the French Valley Airport Because the proposed amendment does not include any changes to the environment, and is not proposing new development into an area not previously affected by these conditions, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 8 I h. i. I j. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a. Issues and Suoportinq Information Sources Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially deqrade water Qualitv? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e,g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been qranted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodinq on- or off-site? Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Require the preparation of a Water Quality Manaqement Plan? Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation InCOrPorated No Impact b. c. d. e. If, g. Comments: Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' 8. a-j, The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment, no development in non- urbanized areas, and would not trigger the preparation of a water quality management plan As a result, no water quality impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan, A:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04.0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 9 I a, b. I c, 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and SuppartinCllnformation Sources Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact v' v' Less Than Significant Impact v' 9. a-c. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and would not divide any established communities. The project is consistent with the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula and conforms to Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Because there are no conflicts with local land use or habitat conservation plans, no impacts are anticipated. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. Issues and Supoortio1} Information Sources Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local qeneral plan, specific plan or other land use olan? b. Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Imoact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' 1Q,a-b. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and will not effect the availability or supply of mineral resources. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean~up\PC Documents\101nitial Environmental Study.doc 10 lb. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a. Issues and Suooortina Information Sources Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other aqencies? I Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive \1roundborne vibration or qroundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the proiect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existin\1 without the project? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? c. d. e. f. Comments: Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' v' 11.a-f. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and none of the historic sites are located within the influence area for the French Valley Airport. As a result, no noise impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. I c. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a. Issues ;md SUDcortina Information Sources Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infras~lJctu!El)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housinq elsewhere? Potentially Significant hiloact Potentially Significant .Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Impact v' b. less Than Signilicant Imoact v' v' R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04~0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 11 Comments: 12.a-c. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment. The project will not change the anticipated land uses and would not displace any existing housing units. As a result, no impacts to housing or population growth are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. I a. b. I c. I d, Ie, 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Issues and Supportina Information Sources I Fire protection? I Police protection? I Schools? I Parks? I Other public facilities? Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact v' v' v' v' v' Less Than Significant Impact Comments: 13.a-e. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula, The proposed amendment will also provide requirements to retain the remaining alleys in the Old Town Area. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment that would result in impacts to service ratios, response time or other performance measures affecting public services. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a. Issues and SUDoartino. Information Sources Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Significant Imoact Potentially Significant. Unless Mitigation Incarcorated No Imeact v' Less Than Significant Imeact b. v' R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 12 Comments: 14,a-b. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and the proposal will not affect the supply or demand for local recreational facilities. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. Ie. If, g. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a. Issues and Suqoortlna Information Sources Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or hiqhways? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? I Result in inadequate emerqency access? I Result in inade(luate parkinq capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g" bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? b. c, d. Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' v' -I -I v' v' 15,a-g. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula, The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment and will not result in any additional increase of project traffic volumes or affect the existing circulation network. As a result, no circulation-related impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 13 I a. b. I g. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: c. Issues and Suoportina Information Sources Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Reqional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause siqnificant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing . facilities, the construction of which could cause siqnificant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and requlations related to solid waste? d. e. f. Comments: Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated No Impact ./ Less Than Significant Impact v' v' v' v' v' v' 16.a-g. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula, The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment. The project will also not require the expansion or extension of public service/utility systems. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04~0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Oocuments\10lnitial Environmental Study. doc 14 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: a. Issues ;md StJooortina Information Sources Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beinqs, either directly or indirectly? b. c. Comments: Potentially Significant lmoacl Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated No Impact v' Less Than Significant Impact v' v' 17.a-c. The proposed project consists of minor amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan to reduce required private open space and require on-site parking for residential units in mixed used projects, provide additional guidance and requirements concerning the continued use and functional design characteristics for the existing alleys, to modify the sign regulations, and modify the historic preservation provisions to apply the requirements to four locations outside of Old Town Temecula. The project proposes no specific changes to the physical environment. As a result, no impacts are anticipated with this amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. I Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analvses and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. R:\OTSP\Plan Amendments\PA04-0596 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 15 SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 4. Old Town Specific Plan. 5, The Initial Environmental Study for Specific Plan Amendment No.8. R:\OTSP\Plan AmendmBnts\PA04-GS96 Supplemental Clean-up\PC Documents\10lnitial Environmental Study.doc 16 ITEM #7 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: CECA: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 19, 2006 Christine Damko TITLE: Associate Planner Planning Application No, PA05-0390 a proposal to modify an existing Comprehensive Sign Program for the Etco Plaza Buildings located at the terminus of Sanborn Drive at Madison Avenue also known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 910-272-005 and 006 (PA05- 0390) o Approve with Conditions i:8J Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial i:8J Categorically Exempt (Section) If Denied: Section 15270, (Projects which are Disapproved) If Approved: Section 15311, (Accessory Structures) o Notice of Determination o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan (Section) DEIR G:\Planning\2a05\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Plann[ng Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Greq Iscas, Siqn Methods Inc. Date of Completion: December 19, 2005 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Service Commercial (SC) Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Existinq buildinq (Etco Plaza) North: South: East: West: Existinq Service Commercial Buildinqs Existinq Service Commercial Buildinqs 1-15 Freeway Vacant/Future Service Commercial Buildinqs Lot Area: N/A Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A Parking Required/Provided: N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY On September 1, 2001, the Planning Commission approved PAOO-0448, a 70,800 square foot office/retail project (Etco Plaza). The project consists of two, three-story buildings having frontage along the 1-15 freeway and Madison Avenue. On April 3, 2003, the Planning Commission approved PA02-0426, a comprehensive Sign Program for the project. The Planning Commission adopted a fairly restrictive program relative to upper floor signage, because the project design and its freeway visibility warranted a more professional office appearance. The key provisions of the program are listed below: . Building One - One sign on the North Elevation (north end) of building. Permitted signage listed above is only allowed for a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50 percent of the second floor of each building. No other second-story or third- story signage is permitted under this approval. . Building Two - One sign on the South Elevation (south end) of building. Permitted signage listed above is only allowed for a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50 percent of the second floor of each building. No other second-story or third- story signage is permitted under this approval. G:IPlannlng\2005IPA05-o39o Etco Plaza. Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlannlng Commission 4-19-o6IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 On April 29, 2003, the applicant file an appeal of Planning Commission's April 3'd approval, but the appeal was deemed invalid because the 15-day appeal period had lapsed, On August 6, 2003, the Planning Commission approved PA3-0323, a modification to the previously approved sign program. The applicant had proposed the same second-story designs in association with the original Sign Program submittal. At that time, staff believed that allowing the additional signage would be detrimental to the aesthetics of the building. The Commission concurred with staff on the north and south ends but approved two signs on the second floor on the east (facing 1-15 freeway) and west sides (facing Madison Avenue) of both buildings. The signs would be located below the secondary arched roof elements on both the east and west elevations but the signs would still only be allowed for a single second-story tenant if that tenant occupies at least 50 percent of the second floor. G:\Planning\2oo5IPA05-o390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlanning Commission 4-19-o6IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 ANALYSIS The applicant has modified the Sign Program to include the following changes: I Existing Program / Prohibits logos Color palette consists of off-whites, tan, umber, and bronze colors Required font type: Futura Heavy BT Maximum copy size is four feet for primary tenant signs Maximum copy size is four feet for secondary tenant signs Maximum square footage is 30 feet Second Floor Tenant Sign: These signs are to identify a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50 percent of second floor WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign): One sign located on the second story under the arch of the east and west side of the buildings to identify a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50 percent of the second floor WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign): One secondary sign for the east and west elevation (one each) is allowed for each tenant occupying two or more ground floor tenant spaces I No freeway signage proposed I The quantity of wall signs shall not exceed eleven for each building I No neon and L.ED. permitted I Signage must be located within the architectural banding Proposed Changes to Program Allow logos to be added within the sign fascias Increase approved color palette significantly Allows the type of font to be determined by the Landlord and the City Increase maximum stacked copy height to five feet for primary tenant signs Increase maximum stacked copy height for secondary tenant signs to six feet Increase secondary tenant signage maximum square feet to 50 feet Second Floor Tenant Sign: These signs are to identify a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50 percent of second floor, or otherwise approved by Landlord and City Tenant Signs (Refer to Exhibit A- WS-2 (a,b) Maximum of two WS-1 sign per building Maximum of one WS-1 sign per elevation Maximum of ten WS-2 signs per building Maximum of five WS-2 signs per elevation Proposed freeway sign age on exhibit A <no I additional information provided) The quantity of wall signs shall not exceed I twelve for each buildinq Allow neon and L.ED. and channel lettering I Eliminates language on how signage must be located within the architectural bandinq G:IPlanning\2oo5IPA05-o39o Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlanning Commission 4-19-o6IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 The applicant has applied for a modification to the approved Sign Program because Etco Plaza has a high vacancy rate. According to the applicant, prospective tenants are not able to have adequate signage for their business/office in these buildings, Staff does not support the proposed sign program modifications because the architectural elements and colors of the buildings are elaborate and increasing the color selections, size, and amount of signage will create an overly busy fac;:ade. This is a major concern for staff because of the high visibility of the buildings to the 1-15 Freeway, Despite the applicant's concern of the high vacancy rates, staff believes that the existing sign program is adequate for future tenants. The buildings have been designed to reflect more of a professional office fac;:ade rather than a typical retail shopping center. Therefore, in accordance with the intent of the City's Sign Ordinance, the signage should complement the look and style of the building, such as the existing Sign Program has done, The proposed changes do not take into consideration the detailed building fac;:ade. Alternative methods of advertising this location should be used for this site rather than relying on increased signage. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION If Denied: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be statutorily exempt from further environmental review (Section 15270, Projects which are Disapproved), If Approved: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt form further environmental review (Section 15311, Accessory Structures), CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program revisions for the Etco Plaza buildings do not comply with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code, According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, it is the goal of the City that the design of the community is the highest quality and the quality of signage plays a very distinctive role in achieving this role. Sign programs should preserve and improve the appearance of the City as a place to live, work, trade, do business and visit. They should also protect the City from the blighting influence if excessive signage so as preserve and enhance the economic base of the City and safeguard property values within the City. In addition, the proposed revisions will increase the size, color variation, font type, and overall look of the signage which will negatively impact the aesthetics of the building. This is a concern for staff because of the high profile location adjacent to the 1-15 Freeway. It is the recommendation of staff that the proposed Sign Program Modifications be denied, In case the Planning Commission supports the application, a Resolution of Approval is also attached to this report. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 FINDINGS Sign Program (Section 17,28.080.B) 1. The proposed sign program revIsions do not satisfy the intent or objectives of the Development Code nor enhance the development. According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, when the quality and amount of signage detracts from the aesthetics of the buildings, the signage can create a visual blight which detracts from the quality of the environment and an individual's perception of the City. The proposed revisions result in excessive signage thereby detracting from the building architecture and aesthetics. 2. The proposed sign program will not preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from the Interstate 15 freeway, and the allowable signage exceeds that which is considered necessary for effective business signage. According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, the City must assure that the signs are appropriate to the type of activity and location to which they pertain. ATTACHMENTS 1, Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 7 2, Approved Sign Program - Blue Page 8 3. Planning Commission Minutes from April 9, 2003 - Blue Page 9 4. Planning Commission Minutes from August 6, 2003 - Blue Page 10 5. PC Resolution 06-_ (Denial) - Blue Page 11 6. PC Resolution 06- _ (Approval) - Blue Page 12 G:IPlannlng\2oo5IPA05-o39o Etco Piaza - Sign RevisionlPlannlnglPlanning Commission 4.19.o6IPC STAFF REPORT. doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM G:\Planning\2005IPA05-o390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevlsiOllIPlanninglPlanning Commission 4-19-o6IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 Siltn Proltram ET[O Plaza MADISON AVENUE AND SANBORN ROAD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA Prepared Far: ETCO Investments, LLC 9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD, SUITE 200 BEVERLY HILLS CA. 90212 Prepared By: <:iMi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Signs And Neon 1749 28th Street Signal Hill CA 90755 June 26, 2003 Revision November 20, 2005 Sign Criteria Subject EHO pun , SIGN PROGRAM Page Location: Madison Avenue and Sonbarn Rood Temecula, CA Guidelines, Directory, and Vendors Purpose ond Intent 2 General Landlord / Tenant Requirements 2 General Specifications Prohibited Signs Sign Types Graphic Exhibits Site Pion Building 1 All Elevations Building 2 All Elevations Woll Signs (Prirnary Tenonts) WolI Signs (Secondory Tenonts) Building Address Nurnbers Multi-Tenant Monument Signage Color Specifications Signoge Detoil Specifications 2 3 3 Date: April 11, 2002 A B C I.i.I:':.I.U D ~ E ~ F ~ G .. H .:.. Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 ~Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. Eledri<1IlI1 Signs And Neon 1749 E 28th SI. Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fa" (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods com N D E X SIGN GUIDELINES, DIRECTORY AND VENDORS A. SIGN GUIDELINES MANUFACTURE: All signs must be U,L, Approved and conform to the Electrical code and any municipal building codes. COLORS & FINISHES: Colors ond finishes must be of highest quality over properly primed surfaces and are subject to owner approval. INTERIOR SIGNS. Interior signs may not be visible from a public street and are not regulated by this program unless they are pertinent to or attached to 0 window. REQUIRED SIGNS: Tenont is required to provide ond maintain in good condition at least one wall sign and suite identification sign in conformance with this program during the term of tenant's lease, B. DIRECTORY PROJECT: ETCO Plaza Madison Avenue & Sanborn Road Temecula CA OWNER/DEVELOPER: ETCO Investments, LLC 9952 SOUTH SANTA MONICA BLVD. SUITE 200 BEVERLY HILLS CA, 90212 (310)691.5500 Phone (310)282-8193 Fax ARCHITECT, Konrad Rieger and Associates 40440 Cormelito Circle Temecula CA 92591 (909) 676-3759 Phone/Fax SIGN DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR: Sign Methods, Inc. 1749 28th Street Signol Hill, CA 90806 (562) 9B9.5755 Phone (714) 427-6875 Fox Contact: Jim Bras, Greg Islas 714.925-7205 phone, fax 714-546-8647 C. APPROVED VENDORS EHO PUZA SIGN PROGRAM <JiM''''' Sign Methods, Inc. 1749 28th Street Signol Hill, CA 90755 1562) 989-5755 Phone (714) 427-6875 Fax Contact: Jim Bras, Greg Islas 714-925-7205 Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Rood Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revis!ons: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 JUlle 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 <:iM'-' SIGN METHODS INC. . Electrl(o:l' Signs And Neon 1749 E 28th SI S;9nal H;II, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fox: (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods com and Vendors Pc gel A PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this sign program is to ensure that the signage in ETCO Plaza reflects the integrity and overall aesthetic values of the Landlord and the City of Temeculo, Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, and any non-conforming signs will be removed by the Landlord at the expense of the tenant. B. GENERAL LANDLORD / TENANT REQUIREMENTS Prior to manufacture of any sign in the Plaza, the Tenant shall submit to Landlord for written approval, two copies detailed drawings. These drawings shall include the building elevation to which the signs are to be attached, sign dimensions, graphics, location, colors, and method of attachment. This approval must be obtained prior to submittal to the City of Temecula. 2. All signs sholl be reviewed for conformance with this criteria and overall design quality. Approval or disapproval of sign submittals based on aesthetics of design shall remain the sole right of the landlord, 3. Prior to the 'lnstall and manufacture of any sign, the Tenant shall obtain 0 sign permit from the City of Temecula. 4. The tenant sholl pay for all signs, related materials, and installation fees (including frnol inspection costs). 5. Tenant foscia signs will comply to all requirements of this plan Logos and colors to be approved by landlord, and City of Temecula. 6. It is the responsibility of the tenant's sign company to verify all conduit and transformer locations and service access prior to fabrication. 7 In the event a tenant vacates his premise, it is his responsibility to patch all holes and paint surface(s) to match existing color of fascia. In addition, the tenant shall provide a blank panel for any freestanding sign ne occupies. 8. Landlord reserves the right to periodically hire on independent electrical engineer, at Tenant's sole expense, to inspect the installation of all Tenant's signs. Tenants will be required to have any discrepancies and/or code violations corrected at Tenant's expense. Any code violations, requests for sign removals, or discrepancies not corrected within fifteen (15) days of notice, may be corrected by the Landlord at Tenant's expense. 9 All tenant signs shall be installed after city permits are secured. 1 a. Cooperative tenant advertising, signing or seasonal event signing will require a specialy event sign permit from the City of Temecula. C GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Sign sizes sholl be limited to maximum widths shown on tenant's elevaTion, and o\so sna\1 not exceed the general sizes outlined". 2. Signs shall be fabricated per the specifications shown. 3 All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building and electrical codes. 4 All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved sign company, according to U.L. specifications. 5. Sign company to be fully licensed with fhe city and state and shall have full workman's compensation and general liability insurance. 6. All penetrations of exterior fascia are to be sealed airtight (color and finish to be approved by landlord and City). 7. All conduits, transformers, junction boxes and openings in building surfaces shall be concealed. Exposed hardware shall be fjnished in a manner consistent with quality fabrication practices. no exposed raceways will be allowed. 8. Signs shall be placed in locations as shown on elevations with landlord approval. 9 All signs shall have its sign permit number, nome of fabricator, date of installation and voltage in a visible locahon. 10 Any tenant sign left thirty (30) days after vacating premises shall become the property of the landlord unless previous arrangements have been agreed upon by landlord and tenant. EHO PUlA SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temeculo, CA Dale: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 <'5Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical SiV"s A"d Neon 1749 E, 28th SI Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655.4336 Fax: (562) 427-6875 www.signme1hods com ~ .- Po g e 2 D. PROHIBITED SIGNS Sinn..:: (:nn5:titlJtinn n TraffjC" Hnmrrl No person shall install or maintain, or cause to be installed or maintained, any sign which simulates or imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffjc sign or signal, or which makes use of the words "STOP", "LOOK", "DANGER" or any other words, phrases, symbols or characters in such a manner os to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic. 2 Sinn<: in Prm:imitv to tJtilitv Line<: Signs which have less horizontal or vertical clearance from authorized communication or energized electrical power lines than are prescribed by the Laws of the State of California are prohibited. 3 Pointed Ip-ttprs will nat hI'! rJermitt",cl 4 ~nbinet/flolJrescent illum;natecl siano; will not be nllowerl 5 Mp.tnl faced cnhinet sinn.;: (pxcent 0<; nmt of a Inanl are ornhihited. 6 Fxtprnallv illLJminnff:.d sinn<; nre, nmhihitpd. 7 ThNP. shall be no mofton sian<;. 8 There <:.hnll hR nn fln"hil"(1 mrwinn nr nudihle <;inn<; 9 Sinn!; must be arrhitectum!lv c:omnntihlp with the entire center and receive approval of landlord and city z.oning, planning and building departments. 10 Nn .;:inn shall nroiect nhnve the oOr)roved .;:inn S!nVl'~looe_ 11 Yehide Sinn.. Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers, or other vehicles which advertise, identify, or provide direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful activity are prohibited. 12 liaht RlJlh Strinm: External displays, other than temporary decorative holidoy lighting which consists of unshielded light bulbs are prohibited. An exception hereto may be granted by the landlord when the display is an integral part of the design character of the activity to which it relates. 13 Billhoard Si("n<; C1,re not oprmitted. 14 The liSP of (] nprmonent sale "inn is orohibiterL The temporary use of these signs is limited to a thirty (30) day period and is restncted to signs (affixed to the interior of windows) which do not occupy more than twenty (20) percent of their respective window area. Each business is permitted a total of not more than ninety (90) days' of temporary signs per calendar year. E. SIGN TYPES 1, WAll SIGNS SIGN TYPE WS-l (Prlmarv Tenant Sianl Sign area not to exceed 87.5 square feet. Sign fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in E:<hibit 'D'. Quantitv And LO("{1t!nn' Maximum of one sign located on the East elevation and one on the West elevation. Single-line or stacked copy is permitted. If tenant displays two signs, second sign must be identical to first. SIGN TYPE WS-2(a.bl (Secondarv Slanl. Each secondary sign is not to exceed 50.0 square feet in area. Sign fabrkat'lon, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'E1. Quantitv And Lor:ntinn: . Sign Type WS-2a (Second Floor Tenant Sign) One secondary sign located on the second story under the arch of the East and West elevations of Building 1 and Building 2. These signs are to identify a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of second floor, or otherwise approved by Landlord, and City. . Sign Type WS-2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign) One secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the East elevation and one secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the West elevation is allowed for each tenant. See elevations for acceptable locations for this type of sign. 2 ~ROUND SIGNS SIGN TYPE MON (MULTI.TENANT MONUMENT SIGN! Two (2) monument signs, as shown in Exhibit IG', to be located as shown on the Site Plan. EHO pun SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27/ 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 261 2003 November 1, 2005 <:jM'-' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical ~i"n5 And Neon 1749 E 28th 5t, Signal Hill. CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 (800) 655.4336 Fa" (562) 427.6875 www signmethods com Sign Criteria Sections D & E Page 3 , , I . LJ -----, ; i i ~ '//,ij ~ i , I; ~ : ~~ :~~ ! ~ ~:l L~\ ~, -LJ 2:= n J L -, I N T E R 5 T A, f E 1 5 \,1 ~'-r---am u J u BUILDING 1 ~ l' ,.JA!!L, ~ (low) (high} ~ n LOCATION OPTIONS ""'- 0 IW,S-2bl ~s.~o\~ WS.2b ( ow) (high) (high) (IOWn) LOCATION OPTION1---.- IMONI, \ \ -----~ ~--.- ~ T ----;~ ~-- -- .... MADISON A V E N U E lW5-11- ~o..i~leWS-l (Pri,na'YTeMntW"IISigl'1 Locall<ln 1ws.2(I,Ii~ '" p.,,;ibl.. W$.7. (s..c""j",y Tenont Wetll Signllomt,on Moximo"."IIw<>{2)"''S-l.ign.perbuilding Maximum,,!,,"" (ll\l<S.l "9n p.rel'tv(]~on Moxlmu", "f ten l10j W'!,-7. ,ign, p",p",ldlng Mwim"TV,,\I;-.,..\5}WS.2.ig....pe'..1...cmoo I ADNl ~ Add,.... Numbers [m:J ~ f'e"WIlY Pylon ~=M(]n"menl P~OJECT ~~40' (~ NORTH nco pun SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Rood Temeculo, CA Date: April II, 2002 ili Revisions: Apnl 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 Jvne 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 Januol)' 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 ;2:: <SMi' SIGN METHODS INC. Elect..ic:al Slg.,. And Neon 1749 E 28th St. 5;9nol Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 1800) 655-4336 Fax (562) 427.6875 www signmethods com SITE PLAN Exhibit A ,;b All IW5.2QI I WS-2a I All IW5-2QI --........ BUILDING 1 - EAST ELEVATION (1.15) All IW5-2QI All IW5.2QI I WS~2Q I J "..'"""'- BUILDING 1 - WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE) . , '"""'- WALL SIGN SCHEDULE, The quantity of wall signs (all types tis1ed below) shall not exceed eleven (12} for each building. I W5-1 I Primary T.nont Sign OM WS.l '"iln I"cal~d On 'he ca,' elhot;on 0"" One r;>n lh" We.! "leva""" IWS-2al Secl)nd Floor Ten!;JfI' 51gn One.econdO"l"9nl"cotedonthe.eccnJ..,,"r und.,'heorch,,!fhoeo',ondWUl ele",!lo". 01 Bo,ld;t'lg 1 "ndB",ld,ng2 The.e'''ln' ore to ,denf,fy " ""gl.'80Cnd-.torv leno"t tool "ccvp,,,.,,tl&".tSO~of.emndllo,,, ,or otherw'-'8 oppro.ed by Landlord ondCily ~ Ground Flol)f Tenant Sign ) One <econd<>'YteMnt"9nonll1eg'C"ndIlOMOf Ihe Eo.lelevolton cnd OM ,",condary lena"t.,gn onth@groundfloofo!theWeslelevat;oni,ollowed foreochtenont ~ I I fI ....1] i.t:i.DtJj , . ,/" -~ .. ... UiflIltE rtt:J:i ~J:'.ml. nm SOUTHEASTELEV (1.5VIEW) BUILDING 1 . SOUTH ELEVATION (INT. COURTYARD) BUILDING 1 . NORTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA) ETfO PUU SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14. 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 <:!Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. EledricGI Sign. And Neon 1749 E 28th 5t 5i9nal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 (BOO) 655.4336 Fa" (562) 427.6875 www signme1hods.com SCALE. 1/32"-1'.0" :':1Ii\Jlt~s Exhibit B ALl IWS-2al ALl IWS_2n I IWS-ll I WS-2a I /' ,............ 1t BUILDING 2 - EAST ELEVATION (1-15) WALL SIGN SCHEDULE, ALl ~-~ ALl IWS-2al The quantity of W(]II signs (all types listed below) shall nol exceed eleven (12) for E!och building. IWS-2a f I W5-1 l Primcny Tenont Sign One WS_l ';g" loca'ed on the Em! nle~ah"n and ,me an the W~., elevation IWS.2al 5etond Floor Tenant Sign One .~c"ndary "9n I"C"'nd On the '6<""d ,10'" unoe. ,h~ arch of ,h~ Eo.! and WHI "I~~ation' ,,!Bu,lding1 ondB",ld,ng2. Thn'8"9M,,'e!o ,d_ntIIY""ngln.econd.to'Y'enonllho.1 OCC~P'''' ", 1.0" SC'S. ,,1 ''''''00 \10""_ '" <>the"".." opP'o.'e" by Londlord and C,ty ~ Ground Floor tenont Sign Onn.econdary I9nant sign on the ground IloOf o( th" Ea.t eievotlon and one.econdarylenont.ign ohlhegroundflooroftheWestelevchoni,allow@d fOT ~a~h tenont BUILDING 2 . WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE) . -- ....... Clu U__~V_~ -..,' m ~"'> - , ~ ! p~ NORTHEASTELEV. 11-5VIEIN) BUILDING 2 - NORTH ELEVATION (I NT. COURTYARD) BUILDING 2 . SOUTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA) EHO PUlA SIGN PROGRAM Location: Modison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June '\ 4, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 <iMi' SIGN ME1'HODS INC. Electrical Signs .And Neon 1749 E 28th 5t 5i9nal Hill, CA 90755 (5621 989~5755 (800) 655~4336 Fa" (562) 427~6875 www signme1hods com SCALE: 1/32"-1'.0" BUILDING 2 All ElevCltions Exhibit C 5'-0" Max. Slacked Copy Height ...L- I I PRIRY TENANT Max. SO% of Wall Width ,- 2'.6" Mal(. letter HI. PAINT rnr OR SrHFnI JI F. ~ Frazee S730W "Loggia" (off-white) ~ Frazee 8732W "Frontier Ton" (light Ion) ~ Frazee 7783M "Toasted Ton" (ton) m Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (clay) I!I Frazee 8735D 'Wild Country" (raw umber) ~ Colorsjobedeterminedandoppro~edbyCity (See Exhibit H) EHO PUlA SIGN PROGRAM Location: SIGN TYPE, i:mJ PRIMARY TENANT WALL SIGN - MAX, 87,S SQUARE FEET FONT, AS APPROVED BY LANDLORD AND CITY, SPEr:lFI(:ATIONS. Individual reverse-pan channel letters, and illuminated channel letters fabricated from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three (3) inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in schedule. Internal neon, or LED illumination. No decoration of channel letter face is permitted. Otherwise Letter styles, Colors, and use of Logos are subject to Landlord and City approval. Madison Avenue and 50nborn Rood Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 SIGN TYPE, I WS-l \ (Typ., Placement Varies) . . . ... PRIMARY' '--m-UNANT ___om Revisions: x:x 1:" C I. \~Xlr ~.l";~iQ;r,.lJ ',; .........., ~ I ..!'J April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24. 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 Ho~ember I, 2005 <:jMi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Signs And Neon 1ft 1749 E 28th 51. 5i9nol Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fox< (562) 427-6875 www.signmefhods com SCALE, 3/32"~ I '-0" -- RlmptNG 1 WFST F!FVATI9N (BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE) Exhibit D Mox. 80% of Wall Width FRA7FF PAI~JT r:nlnR '::;rHFnlJl F. IT{O ~UlJ\ --,- 2'.6' Max. letterHt. SICONDARY TENANT -!!J 8730W "loggia" (off.white) ~ 8732W"FrontlerTan" (Iighttanl .~ 7783M "Toasted Tan' (tan) m 8734M "Bark Mulch' (clay) III 87350 "Wild Country" (raw umber) [3 Colors to be determined and approved by lancl\olcl&Crty, (See Exhibit H) SIGN PROGRAM 6'.0" Max. Stacked Copy Height Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temeculo, CA SIGN TYPE: _.j~lJ'~l:JuJJ SECONDARY TENANT WALL SIGN - MAX. 50.0 SQUARE FEET FONT, OTHERWISE APPROVED BY LANDLORD AND CITY SPFClFI('-ATIONS: Individual reverse-pan channel letters, and llluminated charlnelletters fabricated from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three (3) inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in schedule. Internal neon, or LED illumination. No decoration of channel letter face is permitted. Otherwise letter styles. Colors, and vse of Logos are subject to landlord and City approval. Date: April 11, 2002 j ALT. SIGN lYPE, I WS-2., Revisions: 1IIiIAN'I' April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22. 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 ALT. SIGN lYPE, I WS-2. <5Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrh:C1I Signs And Neon SIGN lYPE, EiIIl::: (Typ., Placement Varies) \ 1749 E 28th SI. Si9nal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fa" (562) 427-6875 www signmethods.com SIGN TYPE, ~ (Typ., Placement Varies) SCALE: 1/32""",1'.0" 8111Lf)ING 1 WESJ FI FVAIION (BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE) ~ ~ ALl SIGN TYPE, I:3llJ (Typ., Placement Varies) Exhibit E 4'_0" Apprx. "? '- 0' : ',0" ",0. \ :..0" ",n", - ..'..:"...\i....~....:~ SIGN TYPE, r:J::I3 BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS SCALE, II2"~I'-O" 1" thick PVC, painted as noted. Numbers to be installed flush to building fascia using VHB tape and construction adheSive. Two (2) sets of oddress numbers per building, as indicated on elevations. PAINT COlOR SCHFDIJLi;: .-!!J :,B~!1 ~1",1 ~ 1m liD Frazee 8730W "Loggia" (off-white) Frazee 8732W "FroMtier Tan" (light taM) Frazee 7783M "Toasted Tan" (tan) Frazee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (clay) Frazee 87350 "Wild Country" (raw umber) -SIGN TYPE, IJ:l:I ] ... L ! l L; x XX -JX' IIF2Ilt~J \" "': .,..." ,.,.< 'I~", ,1."'_ -..\:t [II I .'...... ~~. "."", ,", D ~=: co; \,- ~ l:~ : : ~~ ;',/, ] . TYPICAl ADDRESS PLACEMENT SCALE, 1/16"~1'-0" :::rEO EO EHO PUZA SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sonborn Rood Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: _~I April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 E <5Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Signs And Neon 1749 E 281h 51. Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fax. (562) 427-6875 www signmethods com Address Numbers Exhibit F " 8'.0" SIGN ELEVATION SIGN 1YPE: ~ DOUBLE-FACED MONUMENT SPFO FIC':ATIONS "" . "~ m tii Min. 200 sq. ft. landscaping area around base of sign. Landscaping plan must provide for year-round color. Monument ~inn_ cornice and base to be fabricated from aluminum with texcote paint finish as noted in schedule. Tenant cnnv to be routed and backed with white acrylic. Tenant sign cabinet to internally illuminate using flourescent lamps. Adclress numerals to be flat-cut-out aluminum, painted as noted, offixed to base of sign. ET(O PUU SIGN PROGRAM -1'-8"- 6" r ~I." ,.!:""":T", '" ,,,' "]0,: ~ ;! , :]~ , ' ~~ Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Rood Temeculo, CA Date: April ] 1" 2002 c;> '" Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1, 2005 ~ I SIGN PROFILE (Street Side) ~Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Signs And Neon FRA7FF PAINT C':OL()R SC':HFnllll;.;. ~ 8730W "Loggia" (off-while) ~ 8732W "Frontier Ton" (light tan) ,~ 7783M "Toosted Tan" (ton) m 8734M "Bark Mulch" (cloy) III 8735D "Wild Country" (raw umber) [!i Colors to be determined and approved by City (See Exhibit H) 1749 E 28th St Signal HIli" CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655.4336 Fax: (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods com SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" -- Exhibit G lCJ TENANT SIGNAGE COLOR SPECIFICATIONS: The following guidelines are to be adhered to in seleding colors for site and tenant sign age: , Sign color.; should be selected to provide sufficient contrast against building, background colors , Colors within each sign should be harmoniously blended 'Sign colors should be compatible with building background colors , Signage colors should provide voriety and excitement , Color of letter returns should contrast with face colors for a good daytime readability , Neon colors should complement related signoge elements , Color of trim cap retainers must match the color of letter returns and logo returns All sign colors ore subject to review and approval by the Owner as part of the tenant sign submittal 3M COLORS I WHITE #20 - TURQUOISE #236 I I tVORY #005 - EVENING BLUE #317 - BURGUNDY #49 - DARK BLUE #36 - RASPBERRY #133 - BLUE #67 - CARDINAL RED #53 - INTENSE BLUE #127 - RED #33 - PLUM PURPLE #128 - ORANGE #44 - BLACK #012 - YELLOW #015 - APPLE GREEN #106 - EMERALD GREEN #126 ACCEPTABLE COLORS FOR SIGNAGE SHOWN ABOVE. ANY ONE SIGN MAY USE A MAXIMUM OF FOUR COLORS, OTHER COLORS MAY BE ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDLORD AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPT. DUPONT PAINT SYSTEMS FOR PAINTED SURFACES. C SIGNAGE COLORS Exhibit H Signage Detail Specifications II:. CL - NEON 13 (CONCRETE/STUCCO WALL W/O RACEWAY) LISTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600.3, CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS ffilM CAP INSULATING SLEEVES PLASTIC FACE, ~ ruBE SUPPORTS AND CHANNEL LETTER ' SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY 5" OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY =--- LETIER HEIGHT VARIES ruBE SUPPORT_________ NEON ruBE __________ [SPACING MAINTAJNED -......-... PER SPACING 1I\BLE), . PLASTIC FACE )I ELECTRODE INSUlATING / BOOT GTO INSUlATING SLEEVE PROVIDEDWOH / SIGN, CONDun LOCKNUT [TYNCAL), ELECTRODE INSUlATING --.......... BOOT GTO INSUlATING -......-... SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH SIGN, -=- - DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAMP, 7 , WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS, /' WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS -.-/ AND MATERIAL SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION[S) TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, LISTING MARKS: ~ LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION l.P.BEL BE ON EACH LETTER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE. ~ THE FIRSl BLANK SPACE IDENlIFIES THE NUMBER OF EACH SIGN SECTION. ~ THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS, -.... A. BEl'NEEN INSULATED HIGI" VOLTAGE WPING AND 1) PRIt>,/AAY WlNGANO 21 DEAD WETA!. 'NHERE DEAD METAl PAAAJ.lElS THE HIGH VOLTAGE WIRING FOR MOPE TfI,'lN l"lENGTl-I. B BETWEEN NEON TUBING AND NEAREST SURFACE, C. BFTW!:EN UNINSULATED HIGfl VOLTAGE PAJ'lTSANO I) DEAD METAL ANO 211NSULAlED HIGH VOlJAGE OR SU~P'lY CONDUCTORS. D. BETWEEN UIW,SULAIED HIGH VOLTAGE PAAlS AND 1) OTHER INSULATED HIGH, VOLTAGE PARTS AND 21 UNINSULA1ED SUF'PLV AND lOW VOLTAGE PAR~ I VOLTAGE , C D 11001 ,05000 1,'2INCIi 1/41NCfl 3/41NCfl 1 INCH 150011010000 ~4INCH \14 INCH H/e~H j.1/2INCH '1QC:X)11015000 1 INCH '14!NCH HI21NCH 2 INCH __1/4'OX2-1/2'NYLONANCHORS - - fOUR [41 PER LETTER MIN, ____ PRlrvtARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE .. r- NEe 600-5. LISTED FLEX [METAL SHOWNI AND LISTED GTO CABLE (SECONDARY SIDE ONLY). SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL REQUIREMEN1S, FOR NON-METALLIC SEE DWG CM AND C7A, / I- A LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN GROUNDED ENCLOSURE SIGHT [MAXIMUM 50 FT I OF SIGN (MANY INTERPRET TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN) NEC T 10-3[B), 600-6 rl' ) ~ SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING U TABLE ""- SUI1ABLE FOR DAM~ WET, OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR WOOR LOCATIONS ONLY. ACCESSIBLE. ~~ ~ FASTENERS AS REQUIRED '~ BY LOCAL JURISDICTION r - GROUND SCREW TO BACK Of 'LEITER FROM TRANSFORMER CASE. ONE TO EACH LEllER. NEON & CHANNEL LETTER INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAIL ~l #48-Tl DI NOT TO SCALE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES 1~~='~fOOCPNAVl ANDIKSTAUATIONOETAI. 1000TE: 1000WlNG: OtlON-13 I , 11120105 (COtaIlC WAll WKJ RACEWAY) I SCAlE NOT TO SCAlf I I COOROlNA10R I JOE CAVAZOS I DESIGNER: GI I lI\lI~<rl~~daIi;J1 bvSlGNM8J.ClDS.NI%1lTsloraproct.w::e W n vbJl8 ~n p:l'l0I kl pn:dJce.rnr ....tlEWotn:JIlllll"d"llhe~ lIghtolSGN~ CUSTOMER APPROVAlS COMMENTS: I ~PER1Y QWNffi APPROVAL: I ~ER'S Sf3NA'lURt:. , 11l\I;~"opcrIoraC<>Nlt<X:l ~crdwl""'bellllec*ldnb~ \lllll"lJ<Jloo,.,r't<1ll1alli!alloo MfJIIIlaJll! I I REV. # DAlE DESIGNER: ... fleClncal..."Ilf,;,A,na"!if_o" , 749 E. '2arr.SI Tel (5621 gB~ ~1~5 Slg""1 KII. CA 90806 IBOOI 65~.4~~~ WW\N SIGNME'fHO~ COM Fa<- 1~621 427.6875 Exhibit .~~ .,6..:- DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAMP 7 WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS' . 0J!:>i!'/!! WAlL VARIES IN THICKNESS ~ if;' ,c~ AND MA1!RU\li I SEAL BUILOING PENElRATION(SJ10 COMPLYWllH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEC AND LOCAl ELECTRICAL CODE, Signoge Detail Specifications LISTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600-3, CONSISTING OF INSUlATING BOOTS ,1M CAP INSUlATING SLEEVES, PlASTIC FACE, lUBE SUPPORTS AND CHANNELLETIER ' SUITABLE FOR DAMP WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY'S' OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY lUBE SUPPORT _______________ I NEON lUBE ~ ~ (SPACING MI>JNTAINED ~, PER SPACING TABLEJ, ' PlASTIC FAC, ~ ELEClRODE INSUlATING / BOOT. GTO INSUlATING SLEEVE PRO'.1DED WllH / SIGN CONDUIT LOCKNUT (M'ICAL(, LETTER HEiGHT VARIES ELEcmODE INSUlATING ~ BOOT. GTO INSUlATING ~ SLEEVE PRO'.1DED WITH SIGN, LISTING MARKS: .. LISTING MARK SIGI~ SECTION lABEL SHAlL BE ON EACH LETIER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE, .. THE FIRST BlANK SPACE IDENTIFIES lHE NUMBER OF EACH SIGN SECTION, .. THE SECOND BlANK SPACE INDICA1!S THE T01Al NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS, .. -- A. BETWEEN MULATED HIGH VOUAGf Wl~,t.lG AND 1) rnMASlYWlNG M'lD 21 Dt.i\D MHAL wrlERE DEAD METAL PARAl.LELS Tf-lE HIGH VQllAGE WlRING FOI1 MORE fH.l\N I" LENGTl1. B. B8V>'EENNEONruBINGANDNEARI'SJSllf<~ACE. c, BflWEEN UNINSlJLA1EO HIGH VOlTAGE PAATSAND 11 Doo METAL AND 2) JIlSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE OR SUPPlVCONOOCTORS (I, BfTWtEN UNINSULATED HIGH 'JOlTAGE PARTS,llJlJO 1) OTHER INSULArED HIGH VOLTAGE PARTS AND 2]lJNINSlAATED S~'PPlY AND LOWVOlTAGE PARTS. VOLtAGE A C 0 1001 TOSOOO 1(.1 INCH 1{4INCH Ji4INCH' I INCH 5001 TO 10000 314 INCH 1/4 INCH 1 liB INCH H/2INCH 11000l!O15000 1 INCH 1/4 INCH 1.1/2 INCH 2 INCH _ ~ 1/4"OX2-II2'NYLONANCHORS /" FOUR (4) PER LE1TER MiN. /" "/: PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE NEC 600.5. / LISTED FLEX [METAL SHOWN) AND US1!D GTO CABLE , (SECONDARY SiDE ONLY), SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR oETAIL REQUIREMENTS, FOR NON-METALLIC SEE DWG C6A AND C7A, , L.. lIS1!D SIGN SECTION (CONSISTS OF TRANSFORMER AND - ~ t ENCLOSUREI SUiTABLE FOR DAMP WET OR OUmOOR GROUND WIRE LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS GROUNDED ENCLOSURE ~ OI!LY ACCESSIBLE NEC 6003 600-5(cIl1112),600-7 ~ "'" , ' 600-B, 600 9(dJ 600-21 & 600 23, GROUNDED ENCLOSURE ~ ~ m ~ ~ lIS1!D DISCONNECT SWITCH iN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN , 'L "SIGHT (MAXIMUM 50 FT I Of SIGN (MANY INTERPRET r- , _ _ ' TRANSfORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGNI 's_ NEC 110 3(B(, 600-6 ro', \ L SPACING MAINTM@ PER SPACING ~TABLE. SUITABLE FOR DAMP WET. OR OUmOOR . LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY t,~ OR iNDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY, ACCESSIBLE, "- FASTENERS AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JURISDICTION ~ '",ii" C~,~."':., f"'''it1' . . 'Lif' - GROUND SCREW TO BACK Of LETTER fROM TRANSfORMER CASE, ONE TO EACH LETTER. CHANNEL lETIER INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil Jl #48-Tl D UNDERWRITERS lABOAATORIES NOT TO SCALE ~ON CHANNEL LETTERS I MTE: IDRA'MNG: Ct~l& I \1119105 (aJI<)lJI.CWI<l"""",,"A~ !SCAl.f: NOTTOSCAI.E COORDINATOR: JOE CAV!J.OS ~SlGNER: GI lN$1Q'1~~de5Q1 bVsa;Nr.EJlD)S.Al"1lllIo~ WnwllolGcrnpatOltlpod,.J::e.~ IrenelsslherGollh:Jlrefl"l2\llwtllll::llstie ~oI3G11MffiK)OS, CUSIOMER APPROVAll COMMENlS: I ~ERlY QlNNER APPllOlAl.: 1~R'SSlGN.4.lURE: 11t*". '...- . ~~ofQronIIoct ~,cnl"'noltl8.-:ad""~ I"flthOutWter1~ I _rjllll~m REV. I DATE: DESIGNER: .. I_ncor.tgru'~"_ 1749E28!tlS!. lel:j562j989.;)S5 S1gr.I;IlH,,',CAWB06 16001655.4336 WWWSIGM'.1Hi'IODSCOM ,,,,. 1562) 427.6875 Exhibit Signage Detail Specifications E1I RCL - NEON - 17 (CONC/STUC WALL W/O RACEWAY) LETTER HEIGHT VARIES UGHT DIFFUSION~ PVCSPACER~" 3'~2' TUBE SUPPORT_____________ .. .:'; NEON TUBE ____ .. (SPACING rvlAlNTAINED ----- t illill PER SPACING TABLE] j RMRSE PAN OIANNEl t. LETTER .000AWMNUM FACES / ,063 AWMlNUM R~NS = ELECTRODE INSULAT1NG -" BOOT. GTO INSULATING SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH. / SIGN CONDurr LOCKNUT (TYf'ICAlI, CLEAR LEXAN BACK ELECmODE INSULATING _____ BOOT. GTO INSULATING ____ SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH SIGN. 1: ~..'. , ' l' X l' ClIPRMTED TO LEXAN ~~:,,:', BACK AND ATTACHED TO SIDE WI ' #8 X '/':( PHILLIPS SCREW. JIt~ UGHT DIFFUSION -/ . I SEAl BUILDING PENETRA1l0N(S) TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, LISTING rvlARKS _ LISTING MARK SIGN SECTiON LABEL BE ON EACH LETTER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE. _ THE FIRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER OF EACH SIGN SECTION. _ THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS ,:c ~ ,{. -- A, BEl'NEEN INSU1AIED HIGH VOLTAGE \\o1>ING AND 1) PRIMARY WlNGAND 21 DEAD MElAL \\!HERE D!'AD METAL PAAALLELS ftjE HIGH VOLTAGE 'URING FOR MORt Tki<N l' LENGTH B. 8EJ\o\1EEN NEON IUBINGAND NEAAESI SURFACE C, BElWEEN UNINSULATED HIGH ',OlIAGE PAmS AND 1) DEAD METAl AND 21 INSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE OIl SUPPLY CONDUCTORS. D, BfT'WEEN UNINSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE PARTS AND 1) OTI-IER INSULATED HIGH '/OlTAGE PAIlT, AND 21 UNI~JSlILAIED SUPPLY AND LON VOLTAGE PAIlIS. r 1/4" /J X 4-1/2" DR'lWALL SCREW FOUR (4) PER LETTER MIN. IVOUAGE , C 11001105000 112 INCH 1/4 INCH 3/4 INCH 1 INCH 150011010000 3/4 INCH 1/41NCH 1-118INCH 1.]12 INCH 11000'1015000 1 INCH 1/4 INCH 1.112 INCH 2 INCH ______ RACEWAY HOUSING CLASS 2 TRANSFORMER ...---- II II , ~ .'.'-' .-..;. '...,' ':'lli1" LISTED FLEX [METAL SHOWN) AND USTEDGTO CABLE !\--.. {J~;,<,\': :':' '!"-.,:: [SECONDARY SIDE ONLY). SEE OWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAIL Dr ~~~:>" :t ;,';' REQUIREMENTS, FOR NON-METALLIC SEE DWG CM AND C 7 A. ilL _ ~,C,:j! ~ i:~~~(~~~:~;6 ~~'T;~ i~~RI~:~~N~;:':~~" ," ur 2;::;it~~~ih,:' L?,"): .;:X::'~i TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN) ~i:?~}'?':':-:"" ,,~::,:,::,:,,;.L>;i' , NEC 110-3(B), 600-6. ~ta~:;:k,;pt~:~er~ ~. ~ SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING I::':')'" pj.i'-'" ~.'~;:'1;::;::, C TABLE. ~ SUITABLE FOR DAMp, WET, OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY, ACCESSIBLE - GROUND SCREW TO BACK OF LETTER FROM TRANSFORMER PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE CASE. ONE TO EACH LETTER NEC 600-5. "-- WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS AND MATERtAL NEON & CHANNEL LETTER INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAIL UL #48 UNDER'l'mITErlS lABORATORIES NOTTO SCALE NOTE: 12 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES NOT CARRY (REQUIRE) A GREEN GROUND WIRE I DETAIL: NEON SYSTEM CONCISTUCC WALL W/O RACfWA~ AND IN5W.LATlON DETAIL I DATE: IDRAWlNG:IlCt.f.f(W.1J 11120105 (CCltrn1l.CWAIlW/OAIONAY I SCAlE: Nor TO SCAlE I I CCOROltlW01: JOE CAV~OS I I DESIGNER: GI ltIlI"lrIOlIgrCI~aMVl l>'fSIGN~,AI~IO~ ~Jl~Dll\paIDllC>prc:o:l.Oe.a'>f __,,"-orll'd_ll'e~ ..,.,of!IGN~ I ~PERTY DWlIIER APPROVAl.: I;:USTOMER'SSlGNAlURE: l~~~~-~;~~~ ....._m REV. # DATE: DESIGNER: -......,<""..".,'.'"j ~i \i_nN...."".'....na:N-.;\: I 1749 E, 2B!li SI, . lei' 1562) 989.SI~" Signal HI~ CA. 90806 (800 655.4336 WlVWSIGllMtTHODS calvi en< 156~142i'687S Exhibit Signage Detail Specifications .:II I THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN. PR',MARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE, NEe 600.5 r LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY 10 BE WITHIN SIGHT (MAX ;- 50 FT) OF SIGH (MANY INTERPRET TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO ~ BEPARTOFSIGN\ '~E(ll03IBJ6D06 ,.., (;~ ~ LISTED FlEX (METAL SHOWNI ArJO LISTED G10 CIIBlE (SECONDARY \,;~ SIDE ONLY) SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DHAII REQUIREMENTS FOR E ---l ~> J NONMETAllICSEEDWGC6AAr~DC7A TUB SUPPORT ~I - ~~~. '/; - SPACINGS MAINTAINED PER SPACING TABLE NfQN TUBE SPACINGS MA.INTANED ~ ~ == _ LISTED SIGN SECTION (CONSIST) OF TRANSFORMER AND PER SPACING lASLI: -I'" ENCLOSURE) SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS ALUMINUM OR SHEET METAL FACE ~ ,vJ UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY LOCATIONS DIlLY ACCESSIBLE r~EC 600 =. ~- 36005\c)(1112),6007,oOOB 6009(d\60021&60023 +- Ii~ GROUNDED ~NClOSUH ,~=_:; ~. , ~~~~~:\\\iai~D II, = = >~':2~ ~t.~~:~:? 'I _ljh;!\\;;jj):J;, J == ,~~ ~~~,i;;;l. r~~i~~;~;,:~~~:~~BY :J~l ~ ,,,{;,~:,,,,~,:t~ ~J~~~ \'~ /1 iiJt;,'" Il'"~i bt'~~?_T, LISTED SIGN SECTION N~C 600-3 CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS, INSULATING SLEEVES, ALUM. FACE, TUBt SUPPORTS AND REVERSE PAN CHA~INELLETTER. SUITABLE FOR Dmp, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR nmOOR LOCATIONS ONLY lETTER HEIGHT VARIES CLEAR lEXAN BACK. ElECTRODE INSULATING BOOT, GTO INSULATING SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH SIGN CONDUIT LOCKNUT (TYPICAL) DRAiN HOLES IF USED IN DAMp, WET OR OURDOOR LOCATIONS WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS AND MAlERIAL SEAl BUILDING PENETRATIONS TO COMPLY WITH APPUCABLE BUILDING CODE RfQUIRfME~ @lISTED (OR OTHER ACCREDITED TESTING lABORATORY) ELECTRIC SIGN SECTION NO, XX.123456 DORD 1/4" X 3" r-rfLON ANCHORS, MIN FOUR (41 PtR LETTER. 1~IClUDE SPACER , . 'DEm/t 1.112" VARIES SPACING TABLE, A BETWEEN INSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE WIRING AND {I) PRIMARY WIRING AND (2) DEAD METAL WHERE DEAD METAL PAR.A.LLELSlHE HIGH VOlTAGE WIRING FOR MOR!: THAN I.LEI~GTH B. BETWEEN NEO~JTIJBING AND NEAI\i::ST SURFACE C BETWEEN UNINSULATEIJ HIGH-VOlTAGE PARTS AND (1) DEAD METAL AND (2) INSULATED HIGH VOLTAGf 01\ SUPPLY CONDUCTORS. o BHwfEN UN',NSULATED HIGH-VOLTAGE PARTS Ar~D II) OTHER INSULATED HIGH-VOLTAGE PARTS AND {2) UN',NSULATED SUPPlY ANO LOW VOLTAGE PARTS VOLTAGE IOOlT050QO 5001 TO 10000 10001 TO 15000 . 1/4INCH 1/4 INCH ]f4INCH C 3/4INC'rl I 118 INCH I-WINCH LISTING MARKS: LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION LABEL SHALL BE ON EACH LETTER AND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSlIRE, THE FIRST BLANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NlIMBER OF EACH SIGN SECTION, THE SECOND BLANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS, A 1,'21rKH 3/4 INCH 1 INCH D 11~jCH 1-1/2 INCH 2 INCH I SIGN SECTION UL48.Tl D I , PROJECT: HALO LIT lmERS lOCATION. N/A I DATE I DRAWING. 11/19/05 HALOUTLETIERS peALE NOTED ISALES N/A IDE'IGNER GI This is on origino! unpublish~d d~si9n by SIGN METHODS. All rights to reproduce it in whole or in part or to produce any likenass thereof sholl remain the exclusive right of SIGN METHODS. ., "1I.""IL:,..:.,~...:".~j~,,,. COMMENTS PROPERTY OWNER APPROVAL cuSTOMER'S SIGNATURE. ThlI.. ."_. l(llaloloeorco::t ~lm'lllrdbe!lllQ9drmplOl1d:>n wlntt:0./j91~ REVISIONS NUMBER. DATE: DESIGNER Eledrl...I$i9nsAndNe..n 1749E.26!hSt lei: 15621989-5755 S.gnol H,II.CA90755 1800)655_4336 www.,ig~m.thod,.oam Fo.: (562) 427.1>875 Exhibit II::JI I LED - 04 (CONCRETE/STUCCO WALL W/O RACEWAY) Signage Detoil Specifications CL WALL MATER"'L DETERMINED ON SITE DURING INSTALlATION FINISHED SURFACE DEPENDS ON STRUCTURE OF EXISTING BUIlDING ON SITE LETTER HEIGHT VARIES 12 VOLTS D,C. L.ED, STRIPS ~ CUT AS REQUIRED \ PlASTIC FACE \ (COLOR DETERMINED BY COMPANY OR ORGANIZATIONS TRADEMARK) L.ED, SCREWED~ TO CHANNEL LETTER BACK WITH #6 X 114' SCREWS OR TAPED WI V,H,B, CLEAR TAPE TO BACK OF LETTER ,1040 X 112' WIDE), "'='= - DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DA:R "7 WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS, WAll VARIES IN THICKNESS AND MA1ERIAL~ I SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUilDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, lISllNG MARKS: .. LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION lABEL BE ON EACH LETTER AND TAANSFORMER ENCLOSURE, .. THE FIRST BlANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER Of EACH SIGN SECTION, .. THE SECOND BlANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS, 1/4" 0 X 4" NYLON ANCHORS {41 PER LETTER MIN. / PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE / NEC 600 5, /,/ 12 VOLTS DC fOR L.ED, UNITS, QTY AS REQUIRED SECONDARY WIRE #18 AWG CABLE, ! LISTED SIGN SECTION (CONSISTS OF TRANSFORMER AND ENCLOSURE), SUITABLE FOR DAMP WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY, ACCESSIBLE, NEC 600-3, 6OD.5Ic)11 )12),600-7, 600-8, 600.9(dl, 600.21 & 600-23. GROUNDED ENCLOSURE ~ LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHIN SIGHT (MAX 50 Fl) Of SIGN, INOTE MANY INTERPRET TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN) NEC 11 0-3IBI, 600-6 rFASTENERS AS REQUIRED BY LOCAL JUSRISDICTION ,:,,;'. L~~ -Z< ~'m_'," f':;j'W' '- l~1~irafN' ~1<;.".':'.: ~f".x1:-;l'l: ilt{it"'~ ~ll'.,,,A:. ~ r ~: ", ~#f:t;l',~""" c:= ~~\?~tj~ i!>.$.~F;)Ji'~ ' -'\",,:,.~~~ /1 (4) PER LETTER MIN_ 12 VOlTS DC FOR L.ED, UNITS IQUATITY AS REQUIRED), SECONDARY WIRE #18 AWG CABLE. L.ED. & CHANNEL LETTER INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAIL UL #48 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES NOT!O SCALE NOTE: 1 2 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES NOT CARRY (REQUIRE] A GREEN GROUND WIRE IOE1All: LE.D.S'YSTEM I WID RACEWAY & 3 PLY WAll AND INSTAl/AlION DErAIL I CAJE: jOOA'MNG: Cl-lEO{l4 I 11120105 LED. W-RACE/3PlYWA1.l I SOlE: NOT '10 SCAlf I IWES NJA I I DESIGNER: GI I nw~Q"l~~destg'\ DlSGN~.IU~to~ tt II "'lOOl&rxn palO1foplOdu::e.a,.." IkeneI$1Ilel6o/8f'dlltIflUllhe8llCiJsM> ~cfSIGNMrnlOOS CU~OMER APPROVAlS COMMENTS: I ~ERlY OWNER APPROVAl: CUSlOMEJrS SIGNAJURE: x lIiI~~.apcJlof(l~ ~<;nj"'roTbu~tt:;J~ 'Oll!IJOJlbu\oOll'JCJJlh;JliI;IlIQ I 1I:.q1ll1~~ REV. # DAlE: DESIGNER: '.'E~t:r!6tI1J;19h..Ari\:t1fitl$!l' 1149E.281h'st 'Tel:{5621969-S755 ~IS:N~~T:b8~S6co~ax:I~2l)6;i/z:?5 Exhibit .. CL - NEON - 12 (CONC/STUCCO WALL WIRAC E WAY) DRAIN HOLES IF USED IN DAM~ 7 ~ WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS / WALL VARIES IN THICKNESS ...../ AND MATERIAL Sign age Detail Specifications USTED SIGN SECTION NEC 600-3, CONSISTING OF INSULATING BOOTS, INSULATING SLEEVES, PLASTIC FACE, TUBE SUPPORTS AND CHANNEL LETTER SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY, ~,. .- TUBE SUPPORT _________ NEON TUBE -----.......... (SPACING MAINTAINED ________ PER SPACING TABLE), . PLASTIC FACE , LETTER HEIGHT VARIES ELEcrnODE INSULATING / BOOT. GTO INSULATING SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH / SIGN_~ CONDUIT LOCKNUT (TYPICAL(, ELECTRODE INSULATING _______ BOOT GTO INSULATING ~ SLEEVE PROVIDED WITH SIGN, SEAL BUILDING PENETRATION(S) TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, LISTING MARKS: ~ LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION lABEL BE ON EACH LETTER ~ND TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE, ~ THE FIRST BlANK SPACE IDENTIFIES THE NUMBER OF EACH SIGN SECTION, ~ THE SECOND BlANK SPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SECTIONS, -..... A. BEtwEEN INSULATED !-IlGl'! VOLTAGE WlRlNGAND I) f'RIMO.RYWV\IG AND 21 DEAD METAl. WHERE :lEAD METAl. PAAALLELS TrlE HIGH VOliAGE WIllt1G FOR MOI?E THAN I" lENGTH B. BElWEEN NEON TUBNG AND NEAllESl SURFACE C. 88W1:EN UNINSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE ?AATS AND I) DEAD METAl AND 2) INSLJlAl<O H~H VOLTAGE on S\JWLY CONDUCTOOS. D. SEMEN UNINSULATED KIGK VOLTAGE PMTS AND I) OTHER INSULATED HIGH VOLTAGE PAAlS AND 2j UfJINSUlA1ED SUPPLY AND LiYNYOlTAGE PAR'!;;. I VOlTAG~ A C D 11001105000 1i2INeH 1/4 INCH 314 INCH 1 INCH 150011010000 3{4lNCrI 1/41t>CH ].lI!lINCE l-ll'2INCH 1',00011015000 llNeH 11.4 INCH 1 112 INCH 2 INCH , ___1/4' 0 X 2-112" NYlON ANCHORS FOUR (4) PER LETTER MIN~ RACEWAY HOUSING, ~ I' ! -- ------ @ ~',~" - USiED FLEX [METAL SHOWN( AND LISTED GTO CABLE :,11,' (SECONDARY SIDE ONLY(, SEE DWG C6 AND C7 FOR DETAil ~, REQUIREMENTS FOR NON.METALLlC SEE DWG CM AND C 7 A k ~ LISTED DISCONNECT SWITCH IN PRIMARY TO BE WITHII'I , SIGHT (M'XIMUM 50 FT.j OF SIGN, (MANY INTERPRET TRANSFORMER ENCLOSURE TO BE PART OF SIGN( >":i~,~:~"", "" NEC 11O-3(B), 600-6, ,~, <f'~!;1~' ~~ SPACING MAINTAINED PER SPACING -,;]~;,-,,-,""_ TABLE, ~ SUITABLE FOR DAMP, WET, OR OUTDOOR LOCATIONS UNLESS MARKED FOR DRY OR INDOOR LOCATIONS ONLY, ACCESSIBLE, PRIMARY ELECTRICAL SOURCE NEC 600-5 GROUND SCREW TO BACK OF LETTER FROM TRANSFORMER CASE, ONE TO EACH LETTER, NEON & CHANNEL lETTER INSTALLATION & WIRING DETAil Ul # 48 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES NOT TO SCALE NOTE: 12 VOLTS SYSTEM DOES NOT CARRY (REQUIRE) A GREEN GROUND WIRE, I DE1AIl: NEON SYSTEM I CONCISI\1C WN.l W/AACBIIAY AND IN$1/>J.lATION DET'lL ! DATE: !DRAWlNG:CLNEON.I'l I 11120105 (CCNCIS1LC W~,t'l WiR,~CEW~.Y1 'SCALE' I ' I COORDIWl.TQR: JOE CAVAZOS [DESIGNER: GI Ill'IIIlIa'lO!lQlnollrlPlblSt8ddlillql ~StGNtJEIHOOS,AJrtgrtJltl~ WI'l\llt1ol9.Oll'lpcflorlopn:DJc6.r:IP( Il:DlwGlhereotrdlfllf"l'll7llh&~ ~ot1J;;NMElHOOS. NO-TO SCALE ClISiOMER APPROVAlS COMMENJS: I ~mv OWNER APPROVAl: I ;uroMER'S SIGNA.IURE: I 11'011.. .".. llapc:rlolaQCl1rO;:l cq&llITlllI'Itcnadrotbel8lacEd~~ v.thout~'OOIh:I&OlIOn NafJIII_ REv. (1 DAlE DESIGNER: i "!?i-;~"':' .."" El""'-".$:Ne{jn 1749E2SthSl. Tel: (S021989-5755 I ~'$7~N~~~~e~,6coMF~if~iI61i7~li#5 i Exhibit Sign age Detail Specifications .. THIS SIGN IS iNltNDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPliCABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN. lISTEDSIGNlWNSISTSOFPOWERSUPPllCHANNELlETTERS,PlASllC FACE,TLrBESUppom,CONDUI1;ANDlilASS WPQRINSULATING BOOT IF PRDV\OEO,AHD DISCONNEnsWrmt IF PROVIDED,AND INSUlJTlNG SLEEVE IF PROVIDH>),SU1TABlEFOR OUTDOORlOCATlON UNlESS MARKED FOR IIlOOOR ONLY ~ /<:',';",1-,>:" _________ DiSCONNECT SWITCH, MAY BE REMOTE (WIATHERPROOF IFOUTOOORSI, HEC6002 -... A. BETWEEN N.'ilVTEDt<I:i~>IJl!A.GE IIoflNGOO II PflWJ1V\\t.JGANO 2] DOO MEW W><Ene DeAD M'TAlPAAAllml"1fH&\'iOl.TAGE\IfllN(;fOflMCllE~l.l!HGIH. ~. BElWEENNEONl\UIJGANDrlEAA!SIMI'ACl:, C.BElWEENI,t!N5UlAlEDHlGHVOl1AGl'fNlrsANOIIDEA!H"'Wi'N021"SUlATEDHiG~\'lX1AGE O~ ~JPPt; CONDlICIC1lS D, BEIWfEIi~NSUtATEDHlGHVOlJAG<l'AA1\N>Ol]OTHEIlMilIlATEDHIS~va.TAGEPAA1SNIJD 21 ~"'5UlAltD SlJ'PlV OOlOWVOlTAGE PM~ RECOGHllEOCOMPONEHTPUSTiCFACE ~ ~_ TUBESUPPORTPEIIHEC600'33(bj~. - NEOHTUBE(SPACINGMAIHTAlHE~ PERSPACINGTABLEj ~ LETTER HEIGHT VARIES I ~ ! ill ~, , } '" ,. CLfARIlXAHBACK__~_ , t ~ }~ -, li; ~ ,,'~ ~ i" S:\':'.'I} -i:ot DRAIN HOLESIFUSEOi~OAMP -....... Ul i .~A - .. II :~ MECHAHICAl lONHECTION (TWISTED OKI___________. 1.lIr IN MIN.CLfARANCETHRDUGH ' AIR DR ACROSS SURfACE TD TUBE CONNECTION, HEC.O~34(bl DR. GUSS CUP OR IHSUUTlNG BOOT _______ (NOREOUIREDSPACINGI _______ WET DR OUTODDR LDCATIOHS .' I'XI'ClIPRWETEOTDlflAHBACKANOATTACHEDTD SIDE WITH #BX %' PHILLIPS SCREWS I SfAlBUILOINGPENETRATION(SjTOCOMPLYWIT~ APPUCABlE BUIL01NGCODE REQUIREMrnTS. USTINGMARKl, ~ L1STINGMARKSIGNSECTlONUBElSHAlLBEOHfACH LETTERAHOTRANSfDRMEREHCLOSURE ~ THEFIRST BUNKSPACE IOENTlfIEl THE HUMBER Of fACH SIGN SECTlDH, ~ THESECONOBUHKSPACEI~OICATEmETOTAl HUMBEROFSIGHSECT~HS, . 2' f+ ~PRIMARYEllmICALSOURCE ...-- (v, IN,MIN.CONDUlT,METAL 1- SHOWHj.HEC600.6&600.21 I VOlTAGE ',001 T05lXXl WINCH 1/4"01 ~141r>1::H 1 INCH 5001101??oo 3J4INCI< 1/4~ lbfllNCH 1 112 INCH 10001101??oo )I~; 114NCH 1.1121NCll ,K" -------- FIRD WIRING COMPAR1MENT RECTRDNICPDWERIUPPll -SPACIHGSMAIHTAIHEDPERSPACINGTABLE ~ 1I4'TEKSCREWS(#IOIWITHSPACftS / ~6'X4'XlI4"SOUARETUBEFOR ,,/ VERTICAL WINDOW FRAME 1I4'TEK SCREWS (#lOjWITH SPACERS OVERHEAD VIEW NOTTOSCAlE UL #48-E4A FRONT AND BACK LIT SELF-CONTAINED CHANNEL LETTER WITH ENCLOSURE SIGN FACE DETAIL (NEON) NOTTOSCAIE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES @underwrilrrs .L Labgratorhslftc. ~~~ UI.""'II....~_tolll..- .......~_<:oo'IlIl._ _.'"____"'CM~ IPROJECT. FROHliMCU.CXUI I SE[f.CONIAIN!OOOMNElLE1TER WITH ENCLOSURESKiH FA(~(NEONI I DATE: I DRAWING, 11/19/05 DETAIL I SCALE N01'0 , SAlE~ N!A DESIGNER GI This is an original unpublished design by SIGN METHODS. All rights to reproduce it in whole or in port or to produce any likeness thereof shall remain the ;;~ METHODS, . " .... ' COMME~ns. I P~ROPERTY OvVNER APPR.OVAl I :USTOMER'S SIGi1ATURE: 1@2oo5SignMethOdS,lnt 1~0'od",""9'1{""~",.tI>o,,",,..,..,.oIS'g" ..,,"....., 'n,., ><gnal H.II. co. """ ,~oIl no'" u'o~ "'dupl"_d,mollo,po..._;'no""....,p,..".d _""'" oomon' oJ 0" oul~"".106';~""'o'Yof S,ooM"""""I"c,.n(o".oo'.b,coPl'"ghtlow . . NUMBER DATE: DESIGNER: 02i24/05 MB <<Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. fl.drltClI5ignsAndN..n 1749E.2BthSt. Tel (5621 98Q.5755 3ig~ol Hill, CA 90755 (800) 655-4336 WWYollgnmelhod..comFa'.i562)427.6875 Exhibit Signoge Detail Specifications .:II lHlS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTAllED IN ACCORDANCE WI1H lHE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF lHE NATIONAl ELECTRiCAl CODE AND/OR OlHER APPlICABLE lOCAl CODES, lHlS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF lHE SIGN, USTED SIGN (CDNSrm Of POWER SUPPL~ CHANNEll1mRS, PLASTIC FACE,ruBESUPPORTS,CONDUI1ANDGlASS CUP OR INSUlATINGBOIlTIF PROVIDED,lNDDISCONNECfSWlTCH IF PRO\'\OfD,ANO INSUlATING SLEEVE IF PROVIDEDl,surUBlEFOROUTDOOR lOCATlON lINlESSMARKEO FOR INDOOR ONLY RECOGNl1ED(OMPONENTPlASTICFA(E~ lUBESUPPORTPERNEC600-33Ibl~, lETTER HEIGHT VARIES ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ It MKHANICAlCONNECTION(1WISTEDOKI_______________ " l-ln'INMIN,ClEABANCHHROUGH . - ~ AIRORACROSSSURFACET01UBE ~ " CONNEUlON. NECbIl~34lbl ' OR, GlASS CUP OR INSUlATING BOOT -----..... INOREOUIREOSPACINGI, -........... '-,~ NEONTUBE\SPA(INGMAINTAINE~ PER SPACING TABLE). ~ .' DBAINHDLESIFUSEDINDAMP'~' WET OR OUTDOOR lOCATION, SEAL BUilDING PENETBATIONISI TD COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE BUilDING COOE REQUIREMENTS, LISTING MARKS, _ LISTING MARK SIGN SECTION lABEL SNAll BE ON EACH lETTERANDTBANSfORMERENCLDSURE. _THEFlRSTBlANKSPACEIDENTlFIESTlHNUMBEROF EACH SIGN SEC1ION, _ THE SKOND BlANKSPACE INDICATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGN SEUlON, ~ DISCONNECTSWITCH. MAYBE REMOTEIWEATHERPROOF IFOUlOOORS).NEC600-2 -- A. BfTWEENM\.V':;O~iGHvOI.TAGEViIljNGAND 'J "RMlJtI'lMNGAND 21 DEAD MElI<l 'Mi(l>EDtAD METALPAlW.Lml",HIG"VClUAG<WJllNGfO/>~IH"'N\.tENG1H. R. etlWl'ENNEQN 1TJB~.iG MlQNEAAE'lTSUIlFACE C. 9ffi\lffN~"'5U!J..TfD"I3.HVOL.TAGEFWll\M<DlIOEADMETAlANDJI~1~LATEOHG/j\'{JlTAGE OIlSUPl'LYC:lNO\JClOR1. D. i~,t'UNW'lSUL.AJW HlSH VOLTAG'iPAW\ >.ND II OTHER INSULAlED~':;~"'D;.rAG, PAI<J\MD 2] U'~'~sulATWSUPPlY AAJD lOWVOIW>f PAAI'S " ~PRIMARYELECTRICAlSOURCE .tI._____ (YJIN MINCONOUITMmL "- SHOWNI NEC600.6&60~21 IVOLlAGt j 1001 I0500J 1,'2INCIf 1!4INC~ J!4INCH liNe" ISOOlIOICJOC() l'~JNCH 1!4INCH 1.1!8INCH 111,1''JCH 1 10001 IOISOOO ,,~ 1!41NCH llnl~H :lINC~ -------- FIELDWIRINGCOMPARIMENT , ElECTRONICP\lWERSUPPIY SPA(INGSMAINTAINED PER SPADNG TABLE 1/4'NYLONANCHORSFORmlYPEOfWAllSIMIN,Of41, PlUSMIN,OFONE3/B'TOGGLEFDRSTUCCOWAllIORI MIN. OF ONE 5/16" EXPANSION ANCHOR HlR CONCRETE WALL JI8'TOGGlEANO~l6'EXPANSIONANCHORSAREFOR LETTERSOVER4'.O'~IGH I Ul #48.E4A I SELF.CONTAINED CHANNEL LETTER WITH ENCLOSURE SIGN FACE DETAIL (NEON) UNDEnWRITERS lABonA-TonlES I@Undul"lfllfitursl .LLabGr~ HE=SIGN ..........--..11I.- w.tl..~....c...III._ _.....,.-..""'~ NOTTOSCAlE I PROJECT SELF-CONTAINEDCHAMMElLmER WITHENClOSURESIGNFACEINEONI I DATE I DRAWING 11/19/05 DETAIL I SCALE ~JOTED ISALfS NfA I'DESIGI'ER GI This is an onglnal unpublished design by SIGN METHODS, All rights to reproduce it in whole or In part or to produce any likeness thereof shall remain the exclusive right of SIGN METHODS, I ftrJi,~lI{~m~~.l'l.~ _ ]' COMMENTS I ?ROPERTY OWNER A?PROVAL CUSTOMER'S SIGNATURE. I his drawing I document is a part of a contract agreement. and will not be released into production without buyer's authorization REVISION NUMBER: DATE. DESIGNER ,.,,"""'" ' " ~.''''0i'.'''''''''' ' " " "'. .' ." . .'..}..,..,.....(. .." SIGNM!THODS INC. ll<ldrlcal Sign. And Neon 1749 !:. 28th5t Tel (562)989.5755 Signo1Hill,CA90755 (800)655.4336 www'''9nm..lhod.<om"'' 1562) 427.6875 Exhibit EHO PUlA SIGN PROGRAM ROUGH NOTES COMPilED BY JAMIE & GREG ISLAS FOR INTERNAL USE (fROM TEMECULA SIGN ORDINANCE) Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Rood Temecula, CA FRFF<;TANnIN(; -"IGNo; NOTFS' 5' SETBACK OR 17' fROM fACE OF CURB (WHICHEVER IS lESS) OUTSIDE SITE VISITllITY AREA PERP TO STREET, EXCEPT AT END Of CUL-DE-SAC 150 FT BETWEEN SIGNS MEASURE HT fROM NEAREST HARDSCAPE . BERMING UP TO 2 FT II' ADDN TO MAX HT AllOWED FLOOD LIGHTING ENCOURAGED SAME BACKGROUND COLOR All TENANTS CENTER ID SIGNS SHAll BE ONE-SIDED, OTHERS TWO.SIDED LANDSCAPING ~ 300 S.F AROUND BASE Ilf FWY.ORIENTED). IF NOT, 100 IF CENTER ID, 200 If MULTI-TENANT Date: Apn( 1 1, 2002 Revisions: INCLUDE flOWERING PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, OR OTHER COlOR PLANTS, YR-ROUND COLOR REO:D. ADDRESS REQUIRED. NOT COUNTED IN AREA IllUMINATION, ONLY COPY TO ILLUMINATE - NO OVERALL FACE ILlUM MJ.J<.. OF 4 PER BUSINESS PER SIDE DESCENDING AREAS PER SIGN~SEE 1720-15 MIN. B' lETTER HEIGHT, 6' fOR STACKED COpy INT. IllUM, CHANNEL LETTERS. HALO NO EXTERNALlllUM, IS PERMITTED. April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 November 1. 2005 NO EXTERNALILlUM FOR MULTI-TENANT SIGNS NOTE SIGN WIDTH (DEPTH?) TABLE WAll SIGNS NOTF::;';' <:5Mi' SIGN METHODS INC. ElectrlcClI Signs And Neon 1-888- TEMECULA 1749 E 2Blh 51 Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655.4336 Fax (562) 427-6875 www sign methods com ATTACHMENT NO.2 APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM G:\Planning\2005\PA05.0a90 Etee Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 ,,-, Sign Program ET[O Plaza MADISON AVENUE AND SANBORN ROAD TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ".."",,,,....,,,' -, Prepared For: ETCO Investments, LLC 540 Westminster Mall Westminster CA 92683 CONDITIONALLY A P PRO VE 0 by the City of Temecula Prepared By: lannlng Director I nnlnQ l..,nmmlsslon:> City Counciio~-A-.w,.,li~-r C; /~ subject to the Findings cuntalned in Resolution No and A , the Conditions of Approval I Exhibit "1 ~~:: No. fTi6?'''C 3Z:~ ~tt /J.NJr; I a - Case Plannr"*WJ D3~ -.- FILE COpy <!iJllli' SIGN METHODS INC. EI.ctricClI5Ign. And N.on 1749 28th Street Signal Hill CA 90755 June 26, 2003 Sign Criteria Subject Guidelines, Directory, and Vendors Purpose and Intent ~ ETC:O' PLAlll SIGN PROGRAM Page Location: Madison Avenue ond Sonborn Rood Temeculo, CA Generol Londlord / Tenont Requirements ;1 Generol Specificotions Prohibited Signs Sign Types 2 2 2 3 3 Dale: April 11, 2002 Graphic Exhibits Site Plan Building 1 All Elevotions Building 2 All Elevotions Wall Signs (Primary Tenants) WolI Signs (Secondory Tenants) Building Address Numbers Multi-Tenont Monument A B C .I''':"L.J. D ~ E .' ItJ'~. F .I'll-Jlo." G Revisions: April 25, 2002 Moy 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 Apr;! 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 C!!iMi' SIGN METHODS INC. lil.etrical Signa And N.on 1749 E 281h St Signal H;!I, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fa" (562) 427.6875 www.signmethods.com N D E X SIGN GUIDELINES, DIRECTORY, AND VENDORS A. SIGN GUIDELINES MANUFACTURE: All signs must be U.L. Approved ond conform to the Electrical code and any municipal building codes. COLORS & FINISHES: Colors and finishes must be of highest quality over properly primed surfaces and are subject to owner approval. INTERIOR SIGNS: Interior signs may not be visible from a public street and are not regulated by this program unless they are pertinent to or attached to a window. REQUIRED SIGNS: Tenont is required to provide and maintain in good condition at least one wall sign and suite identification sign in conformance with this program during the term of tenant's lease. B. DIRECTORY PROJECT: ETCO Plow Madison Avenue & Sanborn Rood Temeculo CA OWNER/DEVELOPER: ETCO Investments, LLC 540 Westminsler Moil Westminster CA 92683 (714) 379-3279 Phone (714) 379-9223 Fax ARCHITECT: Konrad Rieger and Associates 40440 Cormelilo Circle Temecula CA 92591 (909) 676-3759 Phone/Fax SIGN DESIGNER/CONTRACTOR: Sign Methods, Inc. 1749 28th Street Signal Hill, CA 90806 (562) 989-5755 Phone (714) 427-6875 Fax Eno pun C. APPROVED VENDORS SIGN PROGRAM GMT Location: Sign Methods, Inc. 1749 281h Street Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 Phone (714) 427-6875 Fox Contact: Jim Bras Modison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 Moy 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 ~Nli' SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Sign. And Neon- 1749 E, 28th SI Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fax: (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods.com ~~ - Page A. PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this sign program is to ensure that the signage in ETCO Plaza reflects the integrity and overall aesthetic values of the Landlord and the City of Temeculo. Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, and any non.conforming signs will be removed by the Landlord at the expense of the tenant. 8. GENERAL LANDLORD / TENANT REQUIREMENTS Prior to manufacture of any sign in the Plaza, the Tenant shall submit to landlord for written approval, two copies detailed drawings. These drawings shall include the building elevaflon to which the signs ore to be attached, sign dimensions, graphics, location, colors, and method of attachment. This approval must be obtained prior to submittal to the City of Temecula. 2. All signs shall be reviewed for conformance with this criteria and overall design quality. Approval or disapproval of sign submittals based on aesthetics of design shall remain the sole righl of the Londlord, 3, Prior to the install and manufacture of any sign, the Tenant shall obtain a sign permit from the City of TemeculCl. 4, The tenant sholl pay for 011 signs, related materials, and installation fees (including finol inspection costs). {) Tenant fascia signs will be limited to tenant's name. The use of brand name logos will not be allowed on the s.ign. 6. It is the responsibility of the tenant's sign company to verify all conduit and transformer locations and service occess prior to fabrication. 7, In the event a tenant vacates his premise, it is his responsibility to patch all holes and paint surface{s) to match existing color of fascia. In addition, the tenant shall provide a blank ponel for any freestanding sign he occupies. landlord reserves the right to periodically hire an independent electrical engineer, at Tenant's sole expense, to inspect the installation of all Tenant's signs. Tenants will be required to hove any discrepancies and/or code violations corrected at Tenant's expense. Any code violations, requests for sign removals, or discrepancies not corrected within fifteen (15) days of notice, may be corrected by the landlord at Tenant's expense. 8. 9 All tenant signs shall be installed after city permits are secured. 10. Cooperative tenant advertising, signing or seasonal event signing will require a specialy event sign permit from the City of Temecula. C GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 1. Sign siz.es sholl be limited to maximum widths shown on tenant's elevation, and also shall not exceed the general s'lzes outlined". 2. Signs shall be fabricated per the specifications shown. 3. All signs and their installation shall comply with all local building and electrical codes, 4. All electrical signs will be fabricated by 0 U,L. approved sign company, according to U.L. specifications. 5. Sign company to be fully licensed with the city and state and shall have full workman's compensation and generol liability insurance. 6. All penetrations of exterior fascia are to be sealed airtight (color and finish to match existing building exterior). 7 All conduits, transformers, iunction boxes and openings in bUllding surfaces sholl be concealed. Exposed hardware shall be finished in a manner consistent with quality fabrication practices. no exposed raceways will be ollowed, 8. Signs shall be placed in locations as shown on elevations with landlord approval. 9 All signs shall have its sign permit number, name of fabricator, date of instaltation and voltage in a visible location, 10. Any tenant sign left thirty (30) days after vacating premises shaH become the property of the landlord unless previous arrangements have been agreed upon by landlord and tenant. ..----., EHO I PLAlA SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sonborn Rood Temeculo, CA Dale: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 Moy 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 <liME SIGN METHODS INC. lil.drical Sign_ And N.on 1749 E 28th St Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 (800) 655-4336 Fax: (562) 427-6875 www.signmefhods.com Sign Criteria Sections A, B, & C Po 9 e 2 D. PROHIBITED SIGNS 1. ~ians Cnnstitutina n T~nffic Hazard No person shall install or maintain, or cause to be installed or maintained, any sign which simulates or imitates in size, colqrl lettering or design any traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of the words "STOP" "LOOK", "DANGER" or any other words, phrases, s;mbols or characters in such 0 monner os to interfere with mislead, or confuse traffic. ' 2. Sian'. in P(.n~imitv to IJtilitv UnA" Signs which have less horjzontal or vertical dearance from authorized communicafion or energi~ed electrical power lines than are prescribed by the Laws of the State of California are prohibited. 3. pnintAd IAtters will not be of'!rmitted 4. ~abine1/flC')\JreSLent illuminnted !;rons will nnt np. nll<"'lwP-d 5. Metal fnr:el1 cabinet !>inn<: (Axc:ent as nmt t"lf (J It"ln~ rrnhihitAI1~ 6. Externnllv illlJminnterl <;i"l1LQn'": nmhihitp.Q.. 7. Then'! <;hnll hp. nn rnnftnn<;i':!ll... 8. Tharp. <;hnll be nn flnshino. mrwino. or nlJnihll'" "inn.<;. 9. Sinn.<; mlL<;t hi=! MrhitedIJrnlly rr.mnntihlp with the entire center and receive approval of landlord and city zoning, planning and building departments. 10 Nt"l <:inn <:hnll nmiert nht"lVA thp. nnnmvAH <:inn Anvp.ln~ 11 Y~hic:lp. Sinn<: Signs on or affixed to trucks, automobiles, trailers, or other vehicles which advertise, identify, or provide direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful activity are prohibited. 12. 1inht Bulh Strinas External displays, other than temporary decorative holiday lighting which consists of unshielded light bulbs are prohibited. An exception hereto may be granted by the landlord when the display is an integral part of the design character of the activity to which it relates. 13. Rillht"lnrd Sians orP. not nArmittAr1 14. The 11<:1" of n np.rmf"~le ~inn i_c;. nmhihited. The temporary use of these signs is limited to a thirty (3D) day period and is restricted to signs (affixed to the interior of windows) which do not occupy more than twenty (20) percent of their respective window area. Each business is permitted a total of not more than ninety (90) days' of femporary signs per calendar year. 15. ~,., siont"lnl" i<: nMmittp,j, E. SIGN TYPES r, WAll SIGNS SIGN TYPE WS.l (Primarv T..nant Sianl Sign area not to exceed 87.5 square feet. Sig~ fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'D'. Ounntitv Anrl Locntinn' Maximum of one sign located on the East elevation and one on the West elevation. Single~line or sfacked copy is permitted. If tenant displays two signs, second sign must be identical to first. SIGN TYPE WS.2 (S..<ondarv S;oll1 Each secondary sign is not not fa exceed 30.0 square feet in area. Sign fabrication, design, and placement is outlined in Exhibit 'E' Quantitv Anrl In('"('lfinn' . Sign Typ" WS.2a (S..<ond Floor T..nant Sign) One secondary sign located on the second story under the arch of the East and West elevations of Building 1 and Building 2. These signs are to identify a single second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of second floor. Sign Typ.. WS.2b (Ground Floor Tenant Sign) One secondary · tenant sign on the ground floor of the East elevation and one secondary tenant sign on the ground floor of the West elevation is allowed for each tenant occupying two or more ground floor tenant spaces. See elevations for acceptable locations for this type of sign. QROIIN[) SIGNS 2, SIGN TYPE MON (MULTI.TENANT MONl,IMENT $IGNl Two (2) monument signs, as shown in Exhibit IG', to be located as shown --"~"'., UfO PlAn SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 Morch 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 CiiMi' SIGN METHODS INC. IlectrlcllIl 51111n_ Artd Neon 1749 E. 2Bth 51 Signal Hill, CA 9075S (562) 9B9.S755 (800) 655-4336 Fa" [562) 427.6B7S www.signmethods.com Sign Criteria S..<tions D & E Po 9 e 3 I I i ! .1 '.,i /1 !) fl' I II! ~ ~Jq:-~. r1J . ':~' Ii........ I ~;h~R R~l'~ ..'. '.1'1".".".1 I"'I"II"!I~ r .... .,: '"Uilli; 111~W,i, . '. , ..' ,iil::I!!! 1IIIIi.il-.:. . E j~::: 1:,111111; '" ",."" J ~.I I~=rdif ~ ~ .' 1~~ ~ Lj ~I' "{)Iii , : l:.. I I ~ ~ ,I " I ' , , 'I ~ ~ ' jllllllllC l- ~ ~ . [~ ":. ;~' i5. ! ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ !L i <{ ~ ~ ~ ~ z i ~ ''=:) i ! i I i "' <~ 1 , , i ,-- ~ ~ !J ~ ~ - L.J i~ R- ~ " !: c ... ::> o:l R hJ ""~', . s ., ~i I I Yi';lNQ, ~~~ ( -~', ' J _I I~- I ,\ ' , \) >"~V 11\1. ( 1.~~Ll' ; I IZI' 1 z Inl i : 0 D ' ':l: ~ '" ~ I cl , "I " i;; I', ! . I c::; ! 'I I , . i , II , , I I 10 I, ~'i~~'1 ~ , ~ I I, ! : , I I I ~~I 10 1 I ! I i , I I i .--JI I I i ' )J , I / ! Y .--'""" tj,/ L w > <{ z o o <{ :::; .:lllll.U_lt'f!. SIGN PROGRAM lo,alion: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Teme<.ula, CA DClle: Apnl 11,2002 Reyisions: ~r;125,2002 MoV 13,2002 ~~ H: ~gs3 June 20, 2002 J""e27,2002 J"nv,,;y23,2003 March 2~, 2003 A;>ri12'( 2003 J""elO,2003 Jvne 26, 2003 ~Mt SIGN METHODS INC. _",-__n 1749 E. 28th Sl. Signol Hill, Do 90755 (562) 989.5755 (800) 655.4336 Fax: (562) 427.6875 www..ignm..lhods.com SITE PLAN Exhibit A Q Z w " w ~ Z " in !~fh R in! h _ ~c~"'_ i ii~H c ~gl;o8 ~ {l~r ~ t8l~ l8-s~1 e ..,:s D . A 00 l o z . . ; ~ ~ . 001 o > . , . . . ~ c~~ ~m ..; :!.1!.1 ~ ~]& E .~~ ;:: ~ 0 "~l ~ n~~ ~m!~ ~. ~ H:}! J. .; i~4t~ ~ ... ~-"'..o " ~;~-g'" : in~ .".. .. '" ::-;~ "GCC og~.~ {, ~!.I ~-: ~ ~~ ~~ T IW5-2al ~?M.~ BUILDING 1 . EAST ELEVATION (1.15) WALL SIGN SCHEDULE: The quantity of watt signs (all typer. listed below) shall not exceed .Ieven (ll) for each building. I WS-2" \ ~S.:.!J I WS..l I Primary Tenant Sign Ono WS.l "II" located on the Ea~t !tlavatton a"doneontheWe,1 elevation ~~ ""'.r -~: ' me lZD ~ Ground Floor Tenant Sign (pouibl. location) One SltCOndl;lrytltnanls'gn On lh" ground floor 01 the E,,,,.levot,onond,,n...condory lenon' "gn on thegroynd floo'ollho W..tel'''Qlior"l 'Iollowed lot ltoch fenonl ",cvlly,ng fwo ,,,,",,O'e g'ound !loo,tenont,potU IWS-2al Second Floor Tenant Sign O""secondory sill" locoled On Ill" slIcond story vnderlh/lorcholllletollondWesl elevoflons of Bvildiflg1 ondBvilding2.TheS8sigMoreto ,denli/yosingl...cond-sIClryjenonlthol ot1;:\lp\&lo\\&o.150%ol,&conglloor, hi '-11- - - - - BUILDING 1 . WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE) I111l11J11l c--- ~'" r:J 'II Ii ~:IIIj'mi1rl1itWJMi1i~ ~'i~l:~i~i _.~ Ull:liltl: 11ft ~ iWU~~-J _~ ~ .- ~III .. .. I . iii ~- -< SOUTHEASTElEY. (I.SVlEW) BUILDING 1 . SOUTH ELEVATION liNT. COURTYARD} BUILDING 1 . NORTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA) ETto PlAU SIGN PROGRAM LocCltion~ Madison Avenue ond Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 Moy 13, 2002 Moy 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June- 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 CiiMi' SIGN METHODS INC. llectrlcal SI,n. And Neon 1749 E, 28th 51 5i9nol Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 [800} 655.4336 Fo'. (562) 427-6875 www signmethods com SCALE: 1/32'=1'.0" ~ ~ Exhibit B I WS-2a I T ,~ ,,- t1. ""'~! BUILDING 2 . EAST ELEVATION (1-15) WALL SIGN SCHEDULE: The quantity of wall signs (all types listed below) shall not exceed eleven (11) for each building. ~S.:.!J I WS-2a I WS.l I Primary Tenant Sign One WS.l sign located on the Elut ele~alion and one on the We.1 olo~ation ".... ........... J. Ground Floor Tenant Sign (Possible Location) Onoltlcondarytenantsogn on the gravnd floor 01 the Eost ole~alion ond ono secondary tenant sign on th" g,al/nd floor 01 the Well ele~ohan i. allowed for each tenanl occupying tl'lO o' ma,,, grol/nd floort"nont.pace. ~~ ----'-:,,1' " I WS..2a I Second Floor Tenant Sign On" secondary sjgn locoted on the secand.tary under the arch 01 the EelSt ondWel! ele~altons alBl/ilding 1 andlluilding2. Theu.ignl ore to idenli!Yo"inllles"cond,"torytenanllhat occvpiesatlea,t50%af.ecandllaar ~ BUILDING 2 . WEST ELEVATION (MADISON AVENUE) rrmmm ~ ..... p ~ -......... 7 ~ := ~ I ~~ ~~~~jj~ Ix~ Jt NORTHEAST EI.fY. {1.5VIE'#j BUILDING 2 . NORTH ELEVATION (INT, COURTYARD) BUILDING 2 . SOUTH ELEVATION (LOADING AREA) .--.. Eno PUU SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temeculo, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: Apcil 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 Moy 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 <:!iMP SIGN METHODS INC. Electrical Signa And Neon 1749 E, 28th SI. Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fa" (562) 427.6875 www.signmethods.com SCALE,1/32'=I'-0" ~ Eww,\li.~ Exhibit C ,- 2'-6' Max. letter Ht.. 4'.0' Mo;.::. Slacked Copy Heigh'. ...L- SIGN TYPE: m:I , I I PII IV' , . ,.. ,,'C'. .. .' ','. '.,; . ,........,. . A'" .. -" _c' _." "'. .. ,,', ',. ,. .." N.'.' .....'....14.'... ..Hi..- .... '.:ft'" .... .AIJ Fro'" 7783M "Too".d Too" I''') " :; " i _.. ..: " ' .." . . II Frozee 8734M "Bark Mulch" (cloy) . ~:', ~.: "..' ,~:_ ,: "'. ': :, ; ~ I!I Frazee 8735D ''Wild Country" (row umber) ". ., '.' '.' AS /'I./~fA;' PRIMARY TENANT WALL SIGN. MAX, 87,5,0 SQUARE FEET jt:JJ1>/ ~, ::1..--0'1 FON-T: FUTURA HEAVY BT '" Max. 80% of Wall Width PAINT rnln~ C:CHEDULE. , .!lJ Bl Frazee 8730W 'Loggia" (off-white) Frazee 8732W "frontier Ton' (light tan) c;PFrlFICATI0NS' Individual reverse-pan channel letters fabricated from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three (3) inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive enamel in color noted in schedule. Internal 6500 white neon halo illumination. Letters to be installed pin-mounted '.112" off wall. No decoration of channel letter face is permitted. Logos are not permitted. . Height of sign not to exceed 85% of the height of the sign'iibJe portion of the wall on which it is placed (or maximum height indicated in fhis program, whichever /s Jess) I1J SIGN TYPE: IWS.ll (Typ., Placement Varies) -.!!.I -,="~':I "..' , I ' .. -c ':""'.'. . .,...~...- .... .' . '., ...-.,.,..." '. -"'-,,' i,~'; ....,.... "- '(-S( t . I ~ I m " RIIILDING 1 WFSTFI FVATION (BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGEI EUO PLAn SIGN PROGRAM Location: . Madison Avenue and Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: . April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 Moy 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 Jcmuary 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 <!JiM'" SIGN METHODS INC. lElectrlcal 5111n. And Neon 1749 E, 2Bth St, Si9nal Hill, CA 90755 (5621 989-5755 (800) 655-4336 Fax: (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods.com SCALE: 3/32"~1'-0" ~ ~;11"''-~;1'1 Exhibit D 4'-0" Max. Stacked** Copy Height * SIGN TYPE, ~ SIGN TYPE, ~ (Typ., Placement Varies) ", I I SECONDARY 'NAN~ws'2a . . ..... ~WS.2b ?: A:!> p"J':;2-..of SECONDARY TENANT WALL SIGN. MAX, 30,0 SQUARE FEET .3 FONT FUTURA HEAVY BT Max. 80% of Wall Width --.---- 2'.6' Max. LeHer Ht." , .E.B6lf!= PAINT rQI OR srHFn! H t. .!!l 8730W "Loggia" (off-white) ~ 8732W "Frarltier Ton" (light ton) ~ 7783M "Toasted Ton" (tan) m 8734M "8ark Mulch" (clay) ID 873SD "Wild Country" (raw umber) spECIFIC:ATtON~~ Individual reverse-pan channelleHersJabricated from .063 aluminum with .090 aluminum faces. Return depth to be three {3} inches. Exterior to be painted using automotive ~namel in coJor noted in schedule. Internol 6500 white neon holo illumination. LeHers to be installed pin.rn.(;:WJJte&l_,"l~211.pffwall. No decoration of channelleHer face is permiHed. logos are not permitted. .. Height of sign not to exceed B5% 01 the height of the signable portion of the wall on which it is placed (or maximum height indicated in this program, whichever is less). *'" Sign WS-2o only may be stacked. I--"'-- ~ -* x-x '.ooi,~""",-.."......_,'X'" "Oi~ ~w"""'," "~',"'" . \ F:. I ~ R,I JlI rll,N" 1 WfSI fl.fVl'TION (BUILDING 2 EAST ELEVATION IS MIRROR IMAGE) EUO PLAU SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue ond Son born Rood Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 Moy 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 CiiMF SIGN METHODS INC. ll.ctrical Signa And N.oft 1749 E, 28th 51. Signal Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989-5755 (800) 655.4336 Fa" (562) 427-6875 www.signmethods.com SCALE, 1/32'= 1 '.0' ~ - Exhibit E 4'-0" Apprx. I b '- ---L- SIGN TYPE, IJE BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" 1" thick pye, painted as noted. Numbers to be installed flvsh to building ~oscia vslng YHB tape and construction adhesive. Two (2) sets of address numbers per building, os indicated on elevations. PAINT COlOR SCHFDULE, -!1J Frazee 8730W "Loggia" (off-white) ~ Frazee 8732W "Frontier Ton" {light tan] Ald Frazee 7783M "Toasted Ton" {ton} m Frazee 8734M "8ark Mulch" (cloy) III Frazee 87350 "Wild Country" (row umber) -'-';' .~ -SIGN TYPE: tlmJ \~ 0 n I; ~ I ~l , "'.,,', = =iii:iii,.:,r,,;- TYPICAl ADf1RESS PlACEMFNT SCALE: 1/16"= 1 '-0" ~ ~EQ --L EO EHO I PlAZA SIGN PROGRAM Location: MCldison Avenue end Sanborn Rood Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 Revisions: .!'J April 25, 2002 May 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 Jvne 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 .ell C!iMi' SIGN MfiTHODS INC. ll.ctrlarl Slgtw And N.on 1749 E, 28th Sf. Signal Hill CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 (800) 655-4336 Fax: (562) 427.6875 www sign methods com ~ ~I'mm~ Exhibit F 8'.0" ! SIGN ELEVATION SIGN TYPE, tm:m DOUBLE-FACED MONUMENT SPECIFIC' ATIONS, ~ DJ .!!J . '821 liD Min. 200 sq, ft, landscaping area around base of sign. landscaping plan must provide for year-round color. Mnnumpnt siqn,. cornice and base to be fabricated from aluminum with texcote paint finish as noted in schedule. Tencnt coov to be routed and backed with white acrylic. Tenant sign cabinet to internally illuminate using flourescent lamps. At:ldr"'s,> n~'m""rCIl", to be flot.cut-out aluminum, pointed os noted, affixed to base of sign. 6" r ."", "","I~ , """")J?~ "':, ,...:..,....,: --r;.~ .-1:, J?~ I ';> I .;..1'~8":..i. SIGN PROFILE (S'ceo! Side) ETtO' PLAZA SIGN PROGRAM Location: Madison Avenue ond Sanborn Road Temecula, CA Date: April 11, 2002 '? '" Revisions: April 25, 2002 Moy 13, 2002 May 22, 2002 June 14, 2002 June 20, 2002 June 27, 2002 January 23, 2003 March 24, 2003 April 24, 2003 June 10, 2003 June 26, 2003 <:liME FRA7FF PAINT ('01 OR S('HFr11 /I F" SIGN METHODS INC. Ilectrlcal 518n. And Ne.n .!!J 821 "'II "~:,:' m iii 8730W "Loggia" (off-white) 8732W "Frontier Tan" (light ton) 7783M "Toosted Ton" (ton) 8734M "Bork Mulch" (cloy) 87350 'Wild Country" (row umber} 1749 E 28th 5t, Signol Hill, CA 90755 (562) 989.5755 (800) 655.4336 Fo" (562) 427.6875 www.signmethods com SCALE: 1/4'=1'.0' ~ ~ Exhibit G ROUGH NOTES COMPilED BY JAMIE FOR INTERNAL USE (FROM TEMECUIA SIGN ORDINANCE) fRElliANf'lING sl(';tJS Nnrfs, 5' SETBACK OR 17' FROM FACE OF CURB (WHICHEVER IS lESS) OUTSIDE SITE VISITIUTY AREA PERP TO STREET, EXCEPT AT END OF CUL-DE-SAC 150 FT BETWEEN SIGNS l MEASURE HT FROM NEAREST HARDSCAPE - BERMING UP TO 2 FT IN ADDN TO MJV( HT ALLOWED FLOOD LIGHTING ENCOURAGED SAME BACKGROUND COLOR ALL TENANTS CENTER ID SIGNS SHALL BE ONE-SIDED, OTHERS TWO-SIDED lANDSCAPING ~ 300 S.F, AROUND BASE (IF FWY-ORIENTED), IF NOT. 100 IF CENTER 10, 200 IF MULTI-TENANT. INCLUDE FLOWERING PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, OR OTHER COLOR PlANTS, YR.ROUND COlOR REQ,'O. ADDRESS REQUIRED. NOT COUNTED IN AREA ILLUMINATION: ONLY COPY TO ILLUMINATE - NO OVERALL FACE IlLUM, NO EXTERNAL ILLUM FOR MULTI-TENANT SIGNS NOTE SIGN WIDTH (DEPTH?) TABLE WAil SIGNS NOTFS, MAJOR TENANTS ONLY ON MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS MJV(, OF 4 PER BUSINESS (INCL GROUND SIGNS) DESCENDING AREAS PER SIGN~SEE 17,20-15 MIN. 8" LETTER HEIGHT, 6" FOR STACKED COPY INT. IlLUM. CHANNEL LETTERS, HALO, EXPOSED NEON ALLOWED EXTERNAL ILLUM, IS PERMITTED IF PART OF A SIGN PROGRAM, 1-888- TEMECULA ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM APRIL 9, 2003 G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - 8ign Revision\Planning\Plannlng Commission 4-19-06\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 9 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 9, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:06 P.M., on Wednesday, April 9, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Mathewson, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: Guerriero and Olhasso. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of April 9, 2003. (Item No.5 was continued to May 7,2003, and Item Nos. 6, 7, and 8 were continued to April 23, 2003.) 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 19, 2003. 3 Director's Hearina Case Uodate RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for March 2003. R: PlannlngCommlaslonlmlnutulD40903 1 MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1- 3 (amending Item No. 1 - see page 1). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Telesio and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were absen!. COMMISSION BUSINESS There was no Commission Business. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4 Plannina Aoolication No_ PA02-0426 To establish a sian oropram for Etco Plaza. a shoooino center consistino of two buildinas located at 27270 Madison Avenue (Continued from March 19, 2003) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0426, TO ESTABLISH A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA DEVELOPMENT GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 910-272-005 & 006 Highlighting the Planning Commission's previous modifications (March 19,2003) to the requested sign program, Associate Planner Harris reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material). It was noted that since that time, the applicant has revised the sign program, however, not all the recommendations or determinations of the Commission have been made. The following is a summary of the sign program modifications requested by the Commission versus what the applicant has provided (noting the applicant was not in attendance). . That, as per the Commission, there be one sign on the east and west sides of each building; o The applicant's request-modified the sign program accordingly, however, requesting three location options for the primary tenant sign; o Staff would recommend that the signs be located underneath the prominent arched roof elements of the buildings which represents the most appropriate location based on the buildings architectutural features. Therefore, staff would recommend that the two permitted R: PlannlngCammlsslonlmlnules\040903 2 primary tenant signs be limited to these locations on each building and that the sign program be modified accordingly. SECOND FLOOR SIGNS . The Commission determined that one secondary tenant sized sign may be allowed on the north and south side of each building provided there was one second-story tenant; if there were more than one second-story tenant, no second-story signs would be permitted. o The applicant's request-one secondary tenant sign on the east and west elevations, not the north and south elevations. If the tenant were to occupy at least 50% of the second floor. o Staff stated that the applicant's request would result in an excessive amount of signage on the east and west elevations and would detract from the architectural features. Therefore, staff would recommend that the second-slory signage provisions, outlined by the Planning Commission, be maintained and that the sign program be revised accordingly. GROUND FLOOR SIGNS . The Commission determined that there be one ground floor sign for each secondary tenant on the easl and west elevation for each building per tenant (maximum 4); . That if a tenant were to occupy two spaces or more, only one ground floor sign may be granted; . That the applicant concurred with the proposed recommendation as it relates to ground floor sign for each secondary tenant on the east and west elevation; but with regard to the multiple space issue, the applicant would be requesting, in lieu of a ground floor sign, another sign on the second-story. LOGO SIGNS . The Planning Commission determined that no logo sign should be allowed on the building; o The applicant's request to permit logos; o Staff would recommend that the sign program be modified to reflect the Commission's decision. R: PlannlngCommlsalon'mlnulell1040903 3 MONUMENT SIGNS . The Commission determined that two proposed freestanding monument signs along the Madison Avenue frontage were appropriate as proposed; o The applicant's request-to relocate the originally proposed Freestanding Multi-Tenant Identification Signs adjacent to the two site driveways; o Staff has no objection to the revised sign locations provided the signs comply with the sight visibility requirements; o Staff has determined that the proposed sign program for Etco Plaza Development, as conditioner!., does comply with all applicable sign standards identified in the Development Code. Subsequently, staff would recommend that the sign program be approved as conditioned. Mr. James P. Brass, 1749 E. 28th Street Signal Hill, representing the applicant, Sign Methods, Inc., reiterated the multi-space Issue, requesting one secondary tenant sign be located on the second-story of both the east and west elevations of each building to identify a second-story tenant that occupies at least 50% of the second floor space. Commissioner Mathewson noted that significant changes are being proposed by the applicant, stating that the proposed changes would result in more signage on the west and east sides of the building, that he would support staff's recommendation, and reiterating his desire to follow the proposed font style. Addressing the multiple-space issue on the second floor, it was noted by Commissioner Telesio that the intent of the signs on the north and south ends of the building was for a tenant occupying the entire second floor (100%) that there would be no aesthetic impact or a change in total number of signs per building if such signs were granted to tenant occupying 51 % or more. Recapitulating the Planning Commission's decision, Commissioner Mathewson clarified the total number of allowable signs per building; one primary sign on the west and east sides (two); ground floor signs (8); and a secondary sign on the north or south side (one); plus the monument sign. For Commissioner Mathewson, Associate Planner Harris clarified No. 13 of the design guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons used for advertising purposes) with the Planning Commission concurring to not permit such usage. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation as amended as follows: . Secondary signage on the second floor to grant a tenant occupying 51% or more of the second floor a secondary sign on the north and south ends; R: PlannlnvCommlsslon\m'nuleS\040903 4 . Maximum number of signs on each building 11 which would include one secondary lloor sign on the north and south ends 01 the building; . That No. 13 of the design guidelines (Banners, Pennants and Balloons) be stricken. MOTION: Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtlon 01 Commissioners Guerriero and Olhasso who were absent. 5 Plannina Apolication No. PA02-0340 To establish a Comorehensive Land Use Plan in association with a future retail commercial shopoina center located on the ~outheast and southwest comers of Pechanoa Parkwav and State Hiohwav 79 South (Continued from March 19, 2003) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Requesting a continuance to April 23. 2003 (Continued to May 7, 2003; see page 1.) 6 Planninq AODlication No. PA02-0334 To desian. construct. and ooerate a 27,706 sauare foot two-storY office buildina located on Jefferson Avenue and north of Via Montezuma AECOMMENDA TION: 6.1 Adopt a Notice 01 Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-Q334 pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003"_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0334, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 27,706 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.67 VACANT ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON JEFFERSON AVENUE AND NORTH OF VIA MONTEZUMA KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-400..037 (Conlinued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.) R: PlannlngCOmmlulonlmlnuleslO40903 5 7 Plan nino Aop]cation No. PA02-0652 A VestinR Tentative Parcel MaD located on the south side of Rancho California Road. west of Cosmic Road and east of the Rancho Califomia Road I Moraoa Intersection RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-Q652 (Vesting Tentative Parcel Map) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0652, AN EIGHT LOT VESTING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, WEST OF COSMIC ROAD AND EAST OF THE MORAGA ROAD INTERSECTION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 944-290- 012,013,014. (Continued to April 23. 2003; see page 1.) 8 Planning Aoolication No. PA02-0620 To construct. establish and ooerate an 8.100 s!luare foot multi-tenant retail buildino on 1.01 acres located within the Bel Villaoio shoopino center. west of Maroarita Road. 470 linear feet south of the Mall Access Road and North General Keamev Road intersection RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a Determination of Consistency exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0620 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act 8.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: R: PlaMlngCommlulonlmlnul..1040903 6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02.Q620, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE AN 8,100 SQUARE FOOT MULTI.TENANT RETAIL BUILDING ON 1.01 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, 470 LINEAR FEET SOUTH OF THE MALL ACCESS ROAD AND NORTH GENERAL KEARNEY ROAD INTERSECTION AND ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921- 090-063,071,012 AND 078. (Continued to April 23, 2003; see page 1.) COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS A. Having attended the American Planning Association (APA) Conference in Denver, Colorado, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that it was applicant productive and that next years will be in Washington, D.C. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RF.,PORTS Planning Director Ubnoske advised that the second interviews for the Associate Planner position have been scheduled and noted that Assistant Planner Preisendanz has tendered his resignation and that staff has interviewed consultants to prepare design guidelines. Commissioner Telesio readdressed Ex-Parte Communication with Assistant City Attorney Curley providing an updated version of the Planning Commission's Handbook. Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the Ex-Parte communication topic would Be placed on a future Planning Commission Agenda. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular meetina to be held on Wednesdav. AD.ril23. 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula. ~~i{,.)' , Chairman /)RJhr- {I"~<:A- Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning R: PlannlngComml..ionlmlnutes\040903 7 ATTACHMENT NO.4 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FROM AUGUST 6, 2003 G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlanning Commission 4-19-06IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 10 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P,M., on Wednesday August 6, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Olhasso, and Vice Chair Telesio Absent: Commissioner Mathewson and Chairman Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1,1 Approve the Agenda of August 6, 2003 MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve Consent Item No.1. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of June 4, 2003. 2.2 Approve the Minutes of June 18, 2003. 2,3 Approve the Minutes of July 2, 2003. 2.4 Approve the Minutes of July 16, 2003 1 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Consent Item NO.2, The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtio'l of Commissioner Guerriero who abstained from Item No. 2.3 and Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. 3 Director's Hearina Case Uodate RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for July 2003. MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve Consent Item No.3. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. COMMISSION BUSINESS None. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Continued from July 2, 2003 4 Plannina A.pQlication No. PA02-0702 A Develooment Plan for Plannina AQollcation PA02: 0702 for six 161. sino Ie story industrial buildinas totalino aooroximatelv 82.220 sauare feet !ocated on the north side of Zevo Drive. aporoximatelv 500 feet east of Winchester Road IAPN 909-370-007), Dan Lono. Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA02-0702 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-046 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0702, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT SIX FREE-STANDING, SINGLE STORY INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 82,220 SQUARE FEET. THE SITE IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF WINCHESTER ROAD, ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-370-007 Associate Planner Long provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: 2 . That the applicant has been working with staff to enhance the architecture and to provide more detail on the landscaping plan, as requested at the July 2, 2003 Planning Commission meeting Architecture . That building nos. 1 and 6, located on Zevo Drive, include decorative stone, cornice, and pre-cast concrete columns at the arcade of the main entrance . That the arcade will project two feet from the main building and will include a cornice on top of the arcade, establishing a strong main entrance identity . That functional windows (4' x 6') are proposed on the upper portion of the elevations and that windows will provide natural lighting; . That the southwest corner of building no. 1 and the southeast corner of building no. 6 will include corner treatments of stone and glass windows Landscaoina . That the landscape plan has been revised to indicate the precise types of species, as requested by staff Conditions of Aooroval Associate Planner Long requested that the following conditions of approval be revised: . Proi.ect Descriotion - the following text should be amended: o The site is generally located on the north side of Zevo Drive approximately 150 feet east of Winchester Road . Condition No. 17 - That under Plan nino Division/General Reouirements - delete the following (repeated under Condition No. 25): . Q The electrical transformer, gas meter and all other externally mounted utility equipment shall be located in a discreet location and screened with landscaping as approved by the Planning Djrector. By way of photos, Mr. Long continued with the staff report and advised that staff has determined that the revised plans will be consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and Development Code; that staff would recommend approval of the application with the modified conditions (as noted above); and that the project would be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Ralph Hastings, 5031 Birch Street, Newport Beach, architect for the project, stated that he was available for questions. Mr. David Silver, 20 Rivo Alto Canal, Long Beach, Manager of Hastings Partners, Inc., stated that he was also available for questions. 3 At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the item with staff's recommendation with the noted amendment and deletion as noted on page 3. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceotion of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. New Items 5 Planninq Aoolication No. PA03-0249 To add two out-oarcels into the Harveston Soecific Plan and amend the Official Zonino Map located north of the intersection of Ynez Road and Fauilv Drive within the Harveston Soecific Plan. David Hooan. Princioal Planner RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-047 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO ADD TWO OUT-PARCELS INTO THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN AND INCORPORATE TWO OUT-PARCELS INTO THE APPROPRIATE TEXT AND EXHIBITS OF SPECIFIC PLAN (PLANNING APPLICATION PA03-0249) Principal Planner Hogan provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That Lennar Communities has acquired the two out-parcels and would like to incorporate them into the Harveston Specific Plan; that, thereby, amending the Harveston Specific Plan, adding the out-parcels into adjacent planning areas; that the Zoning Map be amended; and that a determination of consistency be made between the amended project and the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR); . That staff has reviewed and conducted an analysis (included in the staff report) that the environmental impact to the project will meet the guidelines of the original certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Matthew Fagan, 42011 Avenida Vista Cadera, advised that he was available for questions. At this time, the public hearing was closed. 4 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceotlon of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. 6 f'lannino Aoolication No. PA03-0254 A re!luest for a one-vear Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel MaD 29643 to subdivide 4.72 acres of vacant industrial land into three p'arcels located on the west side of Business Park Drive aporoximatelv 600 feet south of the Business Park Drive/Rancho Wav intersection. Thomas Thornslev. Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-Q245 (Development Plan) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act; 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-048 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PlANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-Q254, A REQUEST FOR A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME (THE FIRST ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME) FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 29643, TO SUBDIVIDE 4.72 ACRES OF VACANT LAND INTO THREE (3) PARCELS WITHIN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) ZONE, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SOUTH OF THE BUSINESS PARK DRIVE/RANCHO WAY INTERSECTION AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 921-020-068 Associate Planner Thornsley provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That Tentative Parcel Map No. 29643 was first approved on May 3, 2000, in conjunction with a Development Plan (PA99.0478) to build three industrial buildings for which the applicant is requesting a one-year extension of time. In response to Commissioner Telesio's query regarding updating the indemnification condition, Director of Planning Ubnoske explained that this amendment had been requested by the City Attorney in order to update language. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Dennis Armstrong, 1530 Consumer Circle, Corona, applicant's representative, stated that he was available for any questions. At this time, the public hearing was closed. 5 MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff's recommendation with the proposed modifications to the conditions of approval as requested by staff. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Guerriero and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtlon of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. 7 Plannina Aoolication No. PA03-0323 To revise an aooroved sian orooram for Etco Plaza, a shoqoino center consistino of two buildinos located at 27270 Madison Avenue. Matthew Harris. Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO 2003-049 A RESOLUTION OF THE PlANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PlANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0323, TO REVISE AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE ETCO PLAZA DEVELOPMENT GENERAlLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 910-272-005 AND 006. By way of photos, Associate Planner Harris provided an overview of the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That on April 9, 2003, the Planning Commission, although limiting the amount of second- story signage. approved the request for a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Etco Plaza development; that the property owner/developer attempted to appeal the Planning Commission's decision, but that the appeal period had expired; that the applicant Is now proposing to revise the Sign Program, whereby the second-story signs (one sign on the north elevation and one sign on the south elevation) would be replaced with two second- story signs on each building (both east and west sides). . That staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program revisions for the Elco Plaza development do not comply with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code and, therefore, would recommend denial of the application. Requesting clarification of a primary tenant as opposed to a secondary tenant, Associate Planner Harris, for Commissioner Telesio, advised that those terms are not defined in the sign program nor in the minutes and that, therefore, would assume that such a determination would be made by the ownerlleaser. Commissioner Telesio relayed his concern with the allocation of signage, noting that four tenants may occupy the first floor and that the primary tenant would occupy a majority of the space and be permitted a primary sign. At this time, the public was opened, 6 Mr. Afshin Etebar, Manager, Etco Investments lLC, clarified that the north and south sides of the building are blocked by other buildings (Vista Paint and Billiard Depot); that the third floor will be occupied by a primary tenant; the second floor may be occupied by as many as six tenants but that a lease has been signed with one company for the entire second floor; and that because of restrictive signage, leasing of building space has becorne a problem. In response to Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Etebar stated that the signs would be lit at night. Mr. Jim Nadal, 41623 Margarita Road, Westmar Commercial Brokerage, provided a history of the building; advised of the changes made to the building at the request of the Planning Commission; and reiterated that signage is important in order to lease building space. At this time, public hearing was closed. Commissioner Olhasso commented on the aesthetic appearance of the Vista Paint building; expressed concern with the number of signs proposed for the first floor; and requested that the sign allowance be changed from four signs to three signs. Commissioner Guerriero spoke in favor of the applicant's request. Commissioner Telesio spoke in favor of the applicant's request. Planning Director Ubnoske requested clarification to the applicant's recommendation in that the north and south signs would be omitted. Commissioner Telesio stated that the second floor tenant would be granted the primary sign; that the secondary tenant, pending that the tenant occupy at least 50% or more of the second floor, would be granted signs on the north and south ends; and that a maximum of four signs be granted on the first floor. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to deny the staff's recommendation and approve the applicant's request, deletinq the two north and south elevation signs of both buildings and 8Dll.rovinq two signs, on the second floor, on the east and west sides of both buildings. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval with the exceDtion of Commissioners Chiniaeff and Mathewson who were absent. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS None. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Planning Director Ubnoske reminded Commissioners Guerriero and Telesio that the meeting with the architect to discuss the Design Guidelines has been scheduled for August 13, 2003 from 1 :00 P.M. - 2:30 P.M. 7 'r ADJOURNMENT At 6:42 P.M., Vice Chair Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next regular meeting to be held on Wednesday, August 20, 2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Doo~,~..)l- Chairman 7}~'0-~~ Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning B ATTACHMENT NO.5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ (DENIAL) G:\Planning\2005IPA05-o390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlanning Commission 4-19-06IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 11 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 05-0390 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR ETCO PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE Section 1. Greg Iscas with Sign Methods Inc, filed Planning Application No. PA05- 0390, a Sign Program Modification application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code on April 19, 2006. Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. Section 5. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 6. by reference. The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 7. Findinos. The Planning Commission, in denying the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code. A, The proposed sign program revisions do not satisfy the intent or objectives of the Development Code nor enhance the development. According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, when the quality and amount of signage detracts frorn the aesthetics of the buildings, the signage can create a visual blight which detracts from the quality of the environment and an individual's perception of the City. The proposed revisions result in excessive signage detracting from the building architecture and aesthetics. The proposed revisions result in excessive signage thereby detracting from the building architecture and aesthetics, B, The proposed sign program will not preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from the Interstate 15 freeway, and the allowable signage exceeds that which is considered necessary for effective business signage. According to Section 17.28.010 of the Development Code, the City must assure that the signs are appropriate to the type of activity and location to which they pertain. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19-Q6\PC RESOLUTION.doc 1 Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of April 2006, Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the following vote 0; the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-19.06\PC RESOLUTION.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO.6 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ (APPROVAL) G:IPlanning12005IPA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign RevisionlPlanninglPlanning Commission 4.19.06IPC STAFF REPORT.doc 12 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0390 TO MODIFY AN APPROVED SIGN PROGRAM FOR ETCO PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF SANBORN DRIVE AT MADISON AVENUE Section 1. Greg Iscas with Sign Methods Inc, filed Planning Application No. PA05- 0390, a Sign Program Modification application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 19,2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended denial of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 5. by reference, The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 6. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to: 1. All of the signs included in the sign program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination sign type, or sign shape. 2. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified. 3. Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved sign, The proposed sign program modifications will enhance the development, is in harmony with and visually relates to all the signs included in the sign program by incorporating common design elements such as materials and illumination into the program. The proposed sign program modifications will not adversely affect the surrounding development and land uses or obscure adjacent approved signs. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-]9-06\PC RESOLUTION - approval.doc I B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants, C. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height, the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter. The proposed sign program modifications accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants by specifying that tenants vacating premises shall be responsible for the removal of their sign within 30 days of vacating the premises. This includes the removal of the signs, capping electrical wiring, filling all holes and painting wall surface. No new tenant signage will be approved until the prior signage has been removed and the area restored. Section 7. Environmental Comoliance. This project is exempt from review under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15311 (Class 11 Categorical Exemption - Accessory Structures) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of April 2006, Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza - Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission4-19-06\PC RESOLUTION - approval.doc 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the following vote of the Commission: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: AYES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0390 Etco Plaza ~ Sign Revision\Planning\Planning Commission 4-l9-06\PC RESOLUTION - approvaLdoc 3 ITEM #8 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 19, 2006 Emery J, Papp, AICP TITLE: Senior Planner Planning Application No. PA05-0294 is a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Butterfield Station commercial shopping center (PA05-0254), (A.P.N.'s 952-200-002, 011, 012, and 013) located on Highway 79 South between Mahlon Vail and Butterfield Stage Road ~ Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial ~ Categorically Exempt (Section) 15311 (Class) 11 o Notice of Determination o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan (Section) DEIR G:\Plannlng\2005IPAOS-Q294 Buttertield Station SIGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.docl PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Vail Properties Butterfield Staqe L.L.C Date of Completion: October 4, 2005 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Vail Ranch Specific Plan 10 (SP-l0) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant (Residential) T emecula Creek Community Commercial (existinq shoppinq center) Industrial Park (existinq industrial) Lot Area: 6.58 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: N/A Landscape Area/Coverage: N/A Parking Required/Provided: N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS On December 14, 2005, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application number PA05-0254, a Development Plan to construct a 73,306 square foot commercial shopping center. The project was conditioned that the related Sign Program application PA05-0294 be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. The sign program application was submitted October 4, 2005. The shopping center consists of two major tenants and five in line shop tenants on the main pad located on the south half of the property closest to Wolf Store Road, A bank is proposed for Pad A, which is situated on the northwest corner of the site, and four tenants are proposed for Pad B on the northeast corner of the site, The sign program proposes eight different types of signs, for a combined total of 31 signs. The sign program provides clear direction on the number of signs permitted for each sign type as follows: G:IPlanning12005IPA05.0294 Buttertield Station SIGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT,doc2 . Major Tenant 1 & 2 - Each major tenant is permitted up to two wall mounted signs that may be internally illuminated or non-illuminated. The first wall mounted sign shall not exceed 1.5 square feet per lineal foot and may not exceed thirteen feet in overall height. The second sign shall not exceed 80% of the first sign area and shall not exceed seven in height. However, if the tenants move out, the sign program would revert back to the City of Temecula Development Code of one square foot per lineal foot of store frontage. . Suite A inline shop - This tenant is permitted up to two wall mounted signs, The storefront sign will be constructed of dimensional letters/logo painted approved colors from the approved palette and indirectly illuminated by gooseneck lamps. The wall mounted sign for the rear of Suite A will be non-illuminated letters to follow all guidelines as specified on page 9 of the sign program, . Suites B through E - Store front signs will be internally illuminated hanging cabinet signs designed with shapes and graphics consistent with the nature of the product (Examples are found on page 10 of the attached sign program). Wall mounted signs facing Wolf Store road will be non-illuminated letters to follow all guidelines as written on page 9. . Pad A - Eight proposed signs. This tenant is permitted up to four wall mounted signs one on each elevation, three directional signs designed to resemble a monument sign (page 18 of the sign program) and one traffic control sign to be placed over the drive- thru. . Pad B Tenants - Eight proposed wall mounted signs. Each tenant may have two wall mounted signs (one per east and west elevations) and must incorporate one method of illumination as follows: . Open pan channel letter . Luma Haze channel letters . Reverse pan channel letters . Plex face channel letters No two adjacent tenants shail have the same exact method of illumination. The sign program allows for six colors to choose from with a maximum of three colors for each sign. Logos are exempt from this restriction. The sign program allows for a 10 foot 6 inch foot by 12 foot multi-tenant monument sign with 100 square feet of sign area, The freestanding sign will be constructed of stone, tile and aluminum and surrounded by 200 square feet of landscaping. The minimum panel height allowed for each tenant panel will be 15 inches with the minimum letter height being 5 inches. The sign program also allows for an 8 foot by 6 foot second major tenant freestanding sign with maximum of 100 square feet. The second single-tenant monument sign will be constructed the same as the main freestanding sign. This is consistent with Section 17.28.230 of the Development Code. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0294 Buttertield Station SIGPIPlannlnglPC STAFF REPORT,doc3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be Categorically Exempt from further environmental review. (Class 11, Accessory Structures) pursuant to section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15311 applies when a project consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including on-premise signs. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program, subject to the proposed Conditions of Approval, for the Butterfield Station shopping center complies with the purpose and intent of the sign standards of the Development Code. Staff believes the proposed sign program will enhance the development and more fully accomplish adopted sign standards, As a result, staff recommends approval of the proposed sign program as conditioned. FINDINGS Sign Program (Code Section 17,28.080,B) 1. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to: a, All the signs included in the sign program, This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape; b. The buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified; and, c, Surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs. As conditioned, the proposed sign program will preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from Highway 79 South and the allowable signage is appropriate for effective business signage by combining common design elements. 2. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in the building tenants. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. 3. The proposed sign program satisfies the intent of this Chapter, in that the sign program complies with all the regulations of this Chapter, except that flexibility is allowed with regard to sign area, number, location, and height. Further, to the extent the sign program does not comply with the requirements of this Chapter as to sign area, number, location, and height, the proposed sign program enhances the development and more fully accomplishes the objectives of this Chapter. G:IPlanning12005IPA05-{)294 Butterlield Station SIGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc4 The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of the Development Code and will enhance the development, As conditioned, the proposed program results in appropriate signage that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6 2. Proposed Sign Program - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval G:IPlanning12005IPA05.0294 Buttertield Station StGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.docS ATTACHMENT 1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0294 Buttertield Station SIGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc6 ","--J", ! /, '/" 1! /' _, >.,- /'~ /~ l~: ,'~~(;;' '</:: "F~X,~_"~,";< , \ \ J -!to;, / ,&'&;'" tl .if "- [ '/ \, ,~, \..Y\" > ,,""-'% -.::-'tAiy/ &~ "$ "', " ,f -< :; ~~~'o~~~~' ~~ ' }1'~~~} ~ ' ' ,'\~4; [l~}l~i"\{;~~:\~~~~~;~;'" ,</)'1fd~; ;\~;~~~:'/,~;:~~~i(\;',~jr' .' ;.'~ .....r 41'. .:' /'~ //, <<19r //..... -' /' 0J 1 -" " "-cAS:e..\..l<~ :\ , '\-'rR-~Q\ .,< -:"2; ....W"''<;''', " (/ - ';y'&' ,,;;>. < . V.._ CQ,t~:BU;;ST \ \ I' "S. " )"N', \ \ \, ., --OC~l'\).~ \-./(, \ . ,~6"', ,::'.<::~~>;:<,; /:.)' \ \ ' ;. '1,', i ~,l~\~1 :'!L~c'F=-:)' " t~::_ ':~ " ~\~,\~\ :,\\':;'.l{'~. ~~\}'0'~ \ Ii " '-I .. <. A, 9'40 p,' I ",or, , '<''';~"\\\' ". :'Z!:iro/,~;/Il)~~r!~,\~I"~~ttti\JE\\\ ~\:>~~~~:. ;",:, .'~. /:~~..'''''.-<,-]i ~ - i5:J~\{/-. '(" ,:;.,,j: i \\-!, ~[lr~n', \..-\' '(, /Z3;\ \' '-.J~C~\~;t~ \ r ""'~/,l?,y~'srJ""'~. /~~T<',: '~::>>,<,"'!:"i\",J 'IT,c'-.IF:'H,\ .? ~ \\ '; ~~~ 1'7"'~<3 ':}~~~' ;f.p~ '~~)4CtLApiifT! _-",//,f!,:, ~\\--\\.\/ , ~'. (~~ '; 1:_ '-\\\\\h~~. <,) 1.J j L\ ",,~~<o~^--",,~,/--, \ ;>' / " ' ;J!'NA Wv \ I ' , \ \.' ~ '<" '! I <\ \ ,ilF )';::. '/~ '93-?", A ?V;-/'" '" /' '0\\ \1- ~, ,,' BOf/fJ,1J I ". [1,' '/<1:/' / "~/\ -', l>'1-_'--" ~ I MfSA ' \-2. ''\ , /\ \[~I,> '\ \,~ / \<'>> '--" '?-"i--'/' ISITi.\\-,,"\~:\\\r:~,~::--;J ~O/ ,~,/ ~\~/\\' /.>f'~ ,'-,~ (r l"-fJv:'~'tT,~J'~l\-\\;\ A6~>/~o,,)- I' \,--v>S--\~,,< / ,-''?- <! 11/1~'Wsr' 1,,'~'\ 2\\.,//,?(f-/ , ,~_\/\..i;iJ>:)(J\",/>'\- .-- ,l>' ", I -1 I/~ I, r"'r""'--\-\\\',\ .':-'o'k;:/ I ~'{r'\\ / / ,/' \. l~l^ #'{ I <'.'). I 'JJ,-'-"\-,,,,, / ~,/ '( \) \> /-,\/ ~ ;--, $ir ~ \ i\:"<:i"{' .' ..-.' :c:;;;(;;/\;j'~ M FiL ! :);_; - ~<\ $('/" .... ~ ! j ~ }:::J'i /1 "" --::-tft"i \ ,\~'/>I<\\A/ 7:, ,~;! _II//,,'$(' \ ,\x~' 2''' ," ,~ !lfj~~>I~J~">' ",;>"J{- .... v ,:df;l ,,0, ~. "- .0<., -- f-!:.~fF''-' (1 " '$\\ \\~:-6 ~"4 l',q<'lkO( ;n~'( ~'\ '$.:. I WI" \ ~'~."", /,' ,It.' '( '.~f'" ~., ~ 1 ' \ Y ,:\\>-';.J.,,/'1 '<..II'/' -, ""\.' ~ \ 1 ,~,"<J\^\ \/,J:":-"'~" '< '('~' 1 1"c' '1], ",--(-,\\\\~;;-~~$/<"\ :l-J ,,' \ ~ \-\-'(7\ (\,~\;)).;.- ~~,\\\-,<~\j -/ \\\i~~\. ~\~\:'1 ,,-\~-'.~ \ . .~~'r' --"\'"\\ \ --'<\'r\.\-:.. /1,')_1 - -""_( ~\"_"\-j 'e "C.\ \-\ " . \til-"'ij)"'l ,_-I n\).,,',I.'0r"\;,\ \. _ ~ > rJ q r' --' I - ,A 151 \ ''\ \ /\ :0')-1-_:I~.~rl'--",---I.).':._ t(OIJ'P-'\O'\.\\\-';-' -i/\?)_-1_~:{;~H t-:1;-~~\=~'y\ \~\\\\,~\ ", ~, { ] , f)~":~'l 1 ~"p~ / \ . \ " :~\ \ ~ '1 ''j\ "~~j.~~ \.' '" ' , ;p~ j \ ,_. ~.., \ \ J '\ '0,_ \-''';'''''{/j r'\ \ \ -" ,:.-0; '1\ V:. ---;.~- \\~\!, :;\ }. _.- '-1' \ ''1'- Y" \ \ \ ; , , ~, .------------- \~':./-.- $1\" \~\ \,~~_....-. 't... ..,' -,{\"<>, .~..," '.,{r:\' , . , , , \ , \ , \ /' - ", ,~~ , I ProjectSite I :,\C:.};f~2~i~b\ ,-' \\I~ \1 ,\l 11r~~~\ _";\\'01:n.\~LI.~~I:'Y, \~,/ / , Ct-~~N~I/SJ _1 ~_ ~/,\",y. n,\\\\\\c:-:l,,\:y\ ' Y','\I,qil," III' ..,-0 'Yt"' ~,\\ ~ t'i ' Y Y d" ,- , " , ~\\\,\\~~,\\:. ~1'.:;~~1U~5,~~~",c ,,()?lEORARQJ --: '" "' (~.:LU~,j:~~ rJi~; \",<0;0\\\/ \~(5-\'f;\YII\[D~!IiWl ~~f/,/,<\~1Tl \ llT1T1L/;...<;>\"(':<Z%s~ei ~,~;\~~. "'\ w).~-;\ (\\\\\\~ \ ~ -aQfl,~pb-L~ -'ffy "(/ ,(~~\._\llllllll_;a</~^~,,<), "~'III 7f'----~ <"( ",,/ ~\ ':{ ';:;\\..1 )~\Y~:\1J$ W)J.lJJJ) Q t'0:'<::?/~'~',~\I"II"'5"~'><' ':;-:.~, <,:(;:::' __---- \ \\'.:.A\---'~/)-;--'<'\>-i;9<,---;,...;t/'>I"'l~~C_,::!Pk:"" '_ '-" ,/,,-,-,,1->10/,/' Li,,\~-I X~ <",'-0"'<./""-' /,,1::::/[ --- -O~ A \r'::'> "/ X~\.?iS\"'~ v/ - -- - J 11:'11- - '--(..<, ,'....... "'-( ~. "-~ '/~'~^--""';-' /,,~ '\ \~ "<.." '>'~~ /.J--.:. j "..,.,\:,'.::-,,\v-":.r~""'L, \~~o \(<i:S$~~ ~>(fSS~J~~~0>.;"'~'~' II. : /I'''''!''Y~~~~>''<'~/>'.;~/'''~'~~'; ";:;~/:;;~/::: ~ \( ~\LOWVA1L "'+..r ',</'>'rr~,/ ,.-- '~/\ J \---l'J-t~<.~/""""" '\ - X' (J// /. -// v~/)t:.'<<* ':~~:-' ,~-",,;~//,\, '-/;1 "'-... , \' a <.~..., \/\ -1)-, "f~)0 '~ Ill--: /'~''v''<'''> ''-----,'q:O;<,., II. ~_A' \-~J.l\.tiliIR-~- -'---~ '-',' " \ /n~i~ ' ~~//::"'<\-r"... -/-/1 < ./ ,",/\ ,'~r.,,~--.::---~-::.:,~'9~'~^" \1 ./'::Q~o,\ n' I'IIT''';.<';;' / ,.y.'>r~'y / :::;..) ",~~..).J-<;> '< '<;//; '/\\/.':#. ,/.\ ,,,~'>,i:,:'~"Z.\>'0/,,,' < _'-/';;:\"\~-P-W-'fT _j/f}~'--- c".~ l}l G'i/~'.(--v7-Ji;;-- Y{'>'-<\A.,V')?j'\'(t/f~;"CJ\"'~~'l:~>>'C~C/" l.. .~~ t\ \\;:;z'),ge>~r}%):tl,,\\,. " ltQ~P"::;;<"~}");S ~i.?:;'/!:<~<-'>...Y: ~:<~~}i~{ &:;f/!;):}:;J..~:i71J)j~ ,(> b ;~\'~\-0:Yiyrr:Q,{};:'J/::l <)~f?Z/I'\l)> ....j):!,).-.:Y,Jf,0^~/o' '\' ."')<:~-;?:)'\:>~~"o'lf!hl(("U'" /,,,:~/.(-:; "' Ij'Nlf. '.1....' '''''''<''%('~J6 \ ' ,f'//\:Y r, / y~' YI'~>Y{> -, . / '$J['" ~??, '/, )~~','lf;Y~/j~!$J./~t:,\- -,;-, 'v;ji2l\i~~>j,/:C ~'~~'<,:?S~::;\<i~Jl!f{J~)~t>j;~~;:"" X;:>~(X{l)~c::} v/.........y)-~ /.. (..,'M/"\.Y'';..k'v~\~\~'/,,' ...o~>.~.~'-" .' -;,,%')5flb'!i{/;;,/('y 1:S~('15>;;?lllITII .~ ~\ ~~/()~::;Y~')l;~'\\~'\y\\*~\\'HfH[ffjl;;Y":.f.(:1J:::;/ I:::~ ~~ 'IIi .J".....; 1'1>' y y' ~ 1\1' ",'OJ ' "'\ XlV:';; ..., \, . \' ~ .,<"'.....,v '~--! ,<>- ~!...,,~ (~,I., '>';;A?"/J,f. >'yy7':"~1 ;/~/"\"rn=r'-rY\-_.4\-=j <^-/^\i\\\~r~v-----\\\"1/\-r]~;& '~!,---JL; '---'f:::-':L'1" ~~~~<:;5i#;;j~~'i'\ 0 \~[r~rr~~i\A \~\:Sb ~'~)~~'$~flr~'ml<)\' '\fif::t~'if31lgJ' ,<~5f,~ .' :\\~~/ / ; 'v .z. 'y" >-.- '~l '7 /;:::r;' <--- \';r-' L I. ,/ (/)\; .A, Yl> --<-1\1' \ 1 \ - '.&'}Y ~<y ! I J ,.A/, ' ~l<f /"$;6V~~-\;:'.a(Th\\\.\' :/{ J:\'\3:3rmU !-'I~t(.:' .~'t-:\.:.~~\w~:)\\ \ />~:: :::~\ rv~v'~~;;: ../7\ / r~_-., \/ /lYr(/r<:tR~~~3K C~~lJ ~~::::Y ~rrl~11 rrf~ \:~ ,\~-:i---\. ~I -1. -r--'-~~~\\ '-/ . -,"::'::;;i!'", :\>-','T\ ' ,,~ -'/~ /:. ~:i:'!x>~Cli'/ I':;rjUIf i"llJ.\'\ ~< ~\\1!J1 \\\ II \ ~L\\\V :1:: -l:J-~ii0~~\:~\ ,\~\~~:\.y \-~ ;:' ;" " .(Qlii>r:'::".i .;:::__[J..l., '.).<'(,j "- -'~JiE.G"'AOB.,-/ \"\/, r _.f.l ::\---\1 X/\\' \ /l., (\:\ '< , /-<: 'S'>:> \. '" , /"r_ f !~r\\ \ \ ,....-:;:7/, ,-- \ 11:- -1 )~./-) ~ \ ~ .A__ ,f /----A (\Y.'<:,\'- '-.v, \ \ J \ .,-{'( 'C ~_. ~ \ .~ ,~?":~ . ._J -\ .. - ...-........::".'\\\\\\~$\\ .. .._,/c"-\"\ \ \.k-RQQ'f,.F'\ \ \ \ ",," \ I \\;\i,\I"I~\\ \\\:_cl' >'>i. ~ -r'" ,/"'r'. '. '\-.\",.\:".; \, \ i--.' \, ;"-..".,, : ,..,._\,..,1,,,..),,, OO'~"")~ '/ />~..\.\ \'.j"n\.(\i;<.'''.'''';'''f.'. '-- ).. k ' i"fWl.E,W,.\\, \ , , I , '1>-/ ~~A-:.J /' .' \ 1\\ \ \.\.. '$)>.' "'(''Q''''; Ul..\"'" :" ,// / j Ii", CR'~ ~~\'\\ I (";\~1~::;:: f{~/Ji:~:\'D, \.\\ll..fl;I!f~"-T--'- \ "~' "L~___~ ,.-- -~-'. <1/ /.U :~2i ;.~ .\ \--- / .' .. \' ..,~...- '\ \\ \ \ / i' , \ -\ \ \ \ \' \ \" \ \ \- .' .--\- Y , \. \~--- , .. \ ~~~./ s~Q, / / ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED SIGN PROGRAM G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0294 Bultertield Station SIGP\PlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc7 i, 11 ~ \\i ~;;' '.J l 1 , I l ..' 'I ;" " W EST E/~ N.6. S I III N .' . II YilT EMil I , I '-. . u er Ie . a IOD S G \I ::> ~ 0 G ~A VI HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, TEMECULA, CA 92592 .",I.>I,,",...,,.,lC.,,, "I,IL')~" . -" - -"-~'''''''-''''''''''I;jJf.~\t!w"~.;;t,~",,,!<'::ii.U;;;'',.;~"",,..'",': '.~"..",L"-::. .,....,...".. . ' BUTTERfiELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEVELOPER: ;'" BENSON & BOHL ARCHITECTS 3B61 FRONT S1 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 (619) B58.4D40 INTENTS AND DEFINITIONS APPROVALS SIGN ACCEPTABILITY GENERAL CRITERIA 2 PROHIBITED SIGNS MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING SIGNAGE 3 SITE PLAN. OVERALL ,4 ANCHOR TENANT SIGNAGE .5 ELEVATIONS-ANCHOR 1 TENANT (NORTH & SOUTH) ,6 ELEVATIONS-ANCHOR 1 TENANT (WEST) 7 ELEVATIONS-ANCHOR 2 TENANT (NORTH & SOUTH) 8 ELEVATIDNS.ANCHOR 2 TENANT (EAST) 9 INLlNE SHOP TENANT SIGNAGE 10 INLlNE SHOP TENANT HANGING SIGN DETAILS 11 PLOT PLAN.ANCHDR TENANTS & INLlNE SHOP TENANTS 12 PAD TENANT SIGNAGE 13 ELEVATIDN.PAO TENANT (EAST) 14 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR PAD TENANT SIGNAGE 15 PLOT PLAN-PAD TENANTS 16 BANK PAD TENANT SIGNAGE 17 ELEVATIONS.BANK PAO (SOUTH, EAST, WEST) 18 DIRECTORY SIGN DETAILS 19 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN DETAILS 20 PLOT PLAN-BANK PAD TENANT 21 SIGN COLOR PALLmE 22 METHODS OF ILLUMINATION FOR WALL SIGNS 23 MAIN ENTRY FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN 24 ANCHOR TENANT FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN VAIL ASSOC, INC. 11650 IBERIA PLACE SUITE 130 SAN DIEGO, CA 92128-2431 CONTACT: JERRY D. SWANGER, SR, (858) 376-5656 (858) 376-5757 SDMARKI1.com ARCHITECT: ;~ "., APPROVED SIGN VENDOR: WESTERN SIGN SYSTEMS 1020 LINDA VISTA DR, SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 CONTACT: INCHA LOCKHART (760) 736.6070 (951) 907.1700 PROGRAM WRITTEN AND DESIGNED BY PAULINE PFOHL , - ,/ ,WESTE/RN~SIGN _ .V.VEM. ~ f - , " BUTTERFIE1.D STATION - MARCH 20, 2006 ".~~~:'oJC.~",-:.:.....:.~~:'_....:..'_5 , ~~i , ~ il ! 1 j INTENT& DEFINITIO.NS: ihe intent of this Sign Program is to establish standards for the design, fabrication, and location of all signage at Butterfield Station. hereafter referred to as the "Center." As used herein. "Owner" refers to Vail Assot.lnc., or their official representative. Conformity with this program will be strictly enforced, and any non-conforming signs will be removed by the Owner at the expense oltha Tenant. All signs affixed to Tenants leased space are the sole responsibility of the Tenant, and are hereafter generally referred to as "Tenant Signs," All other signs on the Center property are the Owners responsibility, and are hereafter generally referred to as "Center Signs." These signs include one wall sign and three freestanding monument signs. ~PROVAL~ 1. The Tenant must submit two copies of sign design drawings for Owners review and approval. These drawings must include the building elevation to which the signs are to be attached, sIgn dimensIons, graphics, location, colors, and method of attachment. This approval must be obtained prior to submittal to the City ofTemecula. 2. The sign design drawings submitted to the Owner will be drawn to scale and will indicate exact dimensions, copy layout, type style, colors. materials, sign location, and the position of the sign on the building wall. A detailed section drawing through the sign is also required, This drawing will indicate method of attachment to the wall, construction details and the dimensional projection of all sign elements. 3. A stamped set offinal drawings showing the Owner's and the City's approvals shall be on file in Owner'soffice. 4. Drawings for approval should be submitted to: Vail Assoc. Inc. 11650 Ib,.a Place Sun, 130 San Di,go, CA 92128-2431 5. The Owner must be notified 3 business days in advance prior to sign installation. ~!!!!!l\CCEPTABIL.I.!! Only those sign types and sign locations specIfically described herein are acceptable. There will be no exceptions without specific written approval by the Owner. ! . W EST ~'~ ;.I) ~ ~ T~ M~ l, ".."..",., . ,I",,:' ".,.".."lI,I.,'" ,..... .. .' 'r' ~cI'''''''''' '. :.fll.f...;..: ..._'..i~, ,'~~i-'r_',-"",,,':':'!: _ _;.'_ I!ENERAL CRITERIA: 1. ALL sign age requires approval by Owner and the City ofTemecula before construction or installation. 2. Sign sizes shall be limited to maximum widths shown on Tenant's elevation, and also shall not exceed the general sizes outlined. Owner has the final discretion when reviewing the proposed signage and reserves the rightto not allow signage, even if it meets this criteria herein. 3. Tenant will be responsible for all expenses related to their signage, including design fees, permit submittal and application fees, cost of sign fabrication and installation, and cost of eventual sign removal. including repair of any damage to the building. 4. ALL proposed sianage should reflect a sophisticated corporate image in graphic concept as well as in fabrication and installation. 5. Signage should demonstrate intent to identify the user, not advertise a product. 6. Signs and typography shall fIt comfortably into designated sign or architectural spaces, leaving sufficient margins and negative space on all sides. Wall signs shall appear visually balanced and In scale within the context 01 the sign space and the building as a whole. Thickness, height, and color of sign lenering shall be visually balanced and in proportion to other signs on the building. Within each font style, lenerspaclng shall be consistent. 7. Sign colors selected should provide accent and interest appropriate to the associated use of which they are a part. Sign colors will be carefully regulated by the Ownerto assure harmony with the project design. 8. Sign construction shall be of permanent materials. 9. All sign fabrication work will be of excellent quality. All logo Images and type styles will be accurately reproduced. Lettering that approximates type styles will not be accepted. The Owner reserves the right to reject any fabrication work judged to be sub-standard. 10. Fabrication and installation of electrical signs shall comply with all national and local building and electrical codes. 11. All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved sign company, according to U.L specifications, and bearthe U.L. Label. 12. Joining of materials (seams) will be finished in such a way as to be unnoticeable. Visible welds will be 8UTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 1 , , 'i ~'!; ?~ ~.; ;:~ 'i, -41 i ~:i I continuous and ground smooth. Screws and other fasteners that extend to visible surfaces will be filled and finished so as to be unnoticeable. 13. Rnished surfaces of metal will be free from canning and warping. All sign finIshes will be free of dust, orange peel, drips and runs and will have a uniform surtace conforming to the highest standards of the industry. 14. Internal illumination to be 30 milllamp neon tubing, installed and labeled in accordance with the "National Board of Rre Underwriters Specifications." 15. Dimensional letters and panels will be wall mounted without visible means of attachment. 16. Penetrations into walls will be made waterproof. Damage to existing finishes caused by sign installation or removal will be repaired at Tenanfs expense. 17 .In no case will any sign manufacturer's label be visible from the street or from normal viewing angles, unless required by code. 18. Tenant will maintain all signage in a like.new condition. The Owner may, at Tenants expense, replace, refurbish, or remove any sign that is deteriorated. PROHIBITEO SIGNS: -". .'-- The following sign types and treatments are PROHIBITED within Butterfield Station: 1. Roof signs. 2.Flashingsigns. 3. Animated signs (conveying the illusion of motion). 4. Rotating or revolving signs. 5. Signs painted directly onto fascia. 6.Portablesigns. 7.0ff-s~esigns. w 8. Signs within public right-of-way. No sign shall be so placed, erected, or constructed on a utility pole, I I I E BT~/R ~~~T~M~ i '. ,I""~'". ~~';;,W~'.'i.~;;,;.~.i,,'_:,:_ traffic device, traffic sign, warning sign, or so as to impede access to any public improvement, or to obstruct the vision of any such signs except as may be permitted by the City ofTemecula, 9. Signs blocking doors or fire escapes. 10. Outside lightbulb strings (except holiday lights) and exposed-tube neon not contained in a channel letter. 11. Inflatable advertising devices of a temporary nature. including hot air balloons. 12. Advertising structures, including A-frame signs. 13. Statuary (statues or structures) advertising products or logos of the business that are located outside ofthestructurethathousesthebusiness. 14. The use of decals, stick-on or transler letters, or tape on the walls or parapets of buildings, fences, walls or other structures. ~C.ELLANEOUS BUILOING SIGNAG~: WINDOW SIGNS: Sign(s) indicating hour~ of operation, emergency information, accepted credit cards, code requirements, etc. -Maximum sign area = 4 sJ perTenant -Hand painted, decal, or pressure applied I~ttering SUITE IDENTIFICATION: Sign(s) indicating suite address, letter, etc. -4-high,whtte -Hand painted, decal, or pressure applied I~ttering DELNERY ENTRANCE IDENTIFICATION: Slgn(s) Indicating delivery areas, utility rooms, etc. -Maximum sign area: 2 s.f. per location TEMPORARYWINOOW SIGNS: Sign(s) indicating leasing, construction, seasonal, etc. .Signs located on non-door window surfaces shall note exceed seventy five percent (75%) of the non-door window area. .They may not be displayed for longer than a ninety (90) day period. BUILDING ADDRESS: Sign indicating building address -12" high, Individual numerals, to contrast with building color BUTTERFiELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 2 ,,' " I,': &~ ~~ tl c;i . ~ ~ ~ I MULll.TENANT MONUMENT SIGN . , _ - TENANT WAll SIGN /--1 ,," ) ;WESTE/R~SI13N ~ ! .,.YIIlTe:.... , l.. ~HIGHWAY79 ~ . -,--_::- ~ - 'i""';''';::' r--:~~~ ~l-:m= I ~t~"lI"I.lII"lIl~~~' II""~" 1:( ~ _______ ~ - - r~S.~ I. i PAD A t = = I ~ I <=1 1 ,~" .c~: --I. . '.' I;" . '--~ , ' r~ de! :> [ C J.. ':-.: ~~~:~ .~. -- ~CI<O" (8~STBUYl .IO.011S;F. J SITE PLAN FOR BUTTERFIELD STATION CENTER -------- :D ~~ 25 "b , ",\ -.~ -Ir l ~! 1111111l] ~ .'i-----,-~ - :: WOLF STOR!:' ROAD ~-:=::- ~ --- II, 1,1 " II, h _,',j,',...."", dl"I~~~I',"J""jll".',"L"'~~ll''li''r'''''--i-i:';1<!''~t;:;!~,l~,,-,cU,... () lJ ~ I . SINGLE TENANT MONUMENT SIGN I I All MONUMENT SIGNS WilL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE PUBLIC RIGHT-Of-WAY AND OUTSIDE THE SITE VISIBILITY AREA AS DEFINED IN SECTION 17.D6.05D.K OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. -= BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2005 3 , ~'I ;~ :{ l' :~ ~ I I I ANCHOR TENA,!T SIGNAGE (16,000 SF OR.MORE LEASED) Area: The first Sign placed on a storefront is not to exceed 1.5 square foot of sign area per lineal foot of frontage. The second sign sllatl not exceed 80% of the first sign area. '" Height: Overall height of first sign not to exceed thirteen (13) feet. Overall height of second sign not to exceed seven (7) feet.'" Length: 75% of adjacent sign band length Secondary Sign: Yes (Not to exceed 25% of total allowable sign area.) Only major serviceS/departments allowed. No advertising or slogans. These are 10 be internally illuminated or non-illuminated dimensional letters. Secondary slgnage may NOT appear with primary signage. Stacked Copy: Minimum 4' space between copy. Materials: A variety of wall sign treatments is encouraged. Single type of construction allowed. Copy: Tenant name/logo. In addition, signage describing products and services is allowed. Type Face: Custom Tenant logotype/name with Owner approval. Colors: Registered corporate color scheme with Owner approval. *Note: Anchor Tenant allowable signage. not to exceed 1.5 square feet of sign area per lineal foot of frontage and maximum heights, will be subject 10 modilicallon upon the vacation of the PremJ ses by tI1e Tenant's or their successor's initially occupying the Premises. ftJture Tenants of either Anctlor Premises shall conformt o the then existing sign orcllnances In the Development Code for the City of Temecula. ' ADDRESS: NON.ILlUMINATEDNUM8ERS PAINTED GlOSS 8LACK FONT: SWITZERLAND BOLD COND. NOTTOEXCEED3S.F. PROVlDEDBYOWNER =AI"'~ ~ .:::- lYPICAL MAJOR TENANTELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l' .0' , WEST i/A ~~~TC:M~ ( ,~ ,~ ~..~'~.rJ!ij' ~~c.~;':"':"'-<",,,,',,;f....,,...' I 75%ofadlacentsignbandlen,~ I ~i=c::A:::~::C::U:O::::~::::T:Em:~:A:::~t:: SINGLE OR DOU6LE LINE COP~ 65% of adjacent sign band length I ._r______nn_nn__.......nnhn_______n_nn____.___________.._ ~._ uuS.E.C.O.NuD.ARYuu SINGLE LINE GOP~ SIGN BAND BUTTERFIELO STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 4 ELEVATIONS.ANCHOR 1 125'-0" fRONTAGE ADDRESS: I NON.ILLUM',!CATEONUMBERS PAltmOGUlSS8LACK FQNT:SWrTZERLANOBOLDCONO. NOT TO EXCEEDJ S.F PRO':IDEDBYDWNER SIGN BAND <;- " .,. ~jRjsK~ l' c;; ~ ~ NORTH ELEVATION ! j I ~-------- . OmoeMax' ~ -- J ~ 1"'ff I ..., SOUTH ELEVATION ; . i SCALE: 1/16"~l'-o" : W EST E/R N ~ SIB N _ I ~.VIlTE"'. i \. .J.", II" ~ ,',..,"..1........... -~~.~~;';<;;.:.v;;;;:;~;.; "..;I~;.:,A.;>..';:i;"'.:::;.'-,. .". .,. "."_,' -I I- ".._..... ~,,_....._..'c,._.~~, 26'-2 %~ .--.-;;.;-" ~.."'-~ fRONT ELEVATION SIGN 183 S,F. 22'.0" :rIa. I ~';'L ..tf\!leMax' ._~. .... ...... REAR ELEVATION SIGN 132 SJ, 6UTTERflELO STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 5 i: " ,.., 11' ~ ~; ,; ~ ~~ SIGN BAND :[4 r:_:_::::::::::lll:IlJIOAIlv:::::::::::::-., ~ T~ I J _~I ~ WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" I ~ I ~ ';' 'w EST E/R NilIS I G N ~ : - SYSTEM. , ( , i \. "1."" ..,.." ""~.~',,dl"1 ,''''"''I..'illIli:tIili~.''o.-. ~-'-,..,.~o'.-"~;:t;',".;,;:..;;'..:;,:.;..kic_,,-_ ,~'__,..,-". ~~~;;~ii~.~ ,,",,~~_E 11_ 172'.9" ~1r~"S:'~'i?:<'E, :"," ,.~~"" .>"~ BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 6 x: ,~ ,~ ~ i "', ~ ~ ~ ,1 ~ t" J I j ELEVATIONS-ANCHOR 2 lB6'.6" SIGN BAND STOREFRONT SIGN 275 S.F. SIGN SPECS: "BEST BUY" YELLOW BACKGROUND BLACK LETTERS = BLACK SlOES ADIlRESS: /NOIHllIJMINATEDNUMBERS PAlrflEDGUlSS8l.ACK FON1SWIlZERLANOBOLDCOND, NOT TO EXCEED 3 Sf. PRDVlDEOBYOWNER 21'-21/B" I r ~I ~~~o.BEST':J~ -, .. BUY :J~ , - -. . ~ -,';;:;::::==--- ~ADDREI$.j NORTH ELEVATION .------- t 11'-0. . , I fEll'] { I .....----...~-----== REAR ELEVATION SIGN 74 S.F, SIGN SPECS: "BEST BUY. YELLOW BACKGROUNO - BLACK LETTERS BLACK SIDES SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" , : / , W EST E/R N~, S I G N j ;", oY. H " . ~ I , " ..~j"', J""""u~~: ','....""~-;~.i\;1!;\fu::{>:*"d~~T:::;rr~~. 'i<.r_",.~,',,- j;. BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 200, 7 lB4'.S" SIGN BAND i,. ri ~ ':::::::::J~~~~~Mr:::::::: ~I ~-- ',' ,', ~i E3 D .~ ~ 1 I I --, ~_ '--.J. EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1116"=1'-0" 'WESTE/RN~' SIGN I ... Y. T C,., II , I , , I 'I.", ,'" "'i"'~',O\J,;..,,,,,,,..,,~",~:i!I'~W-,Jot~~i:l.'L'.':...:;JL: mllilllil::::J: BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 8 _.~~.~. INLINE SHOP TENANT SIG"~ Type Face: The use of logos and distinctive type styles is encouraged far all signs. Tenants may adapt established type styles, lagos, and/or images that are in use on similar buildings operated by them in Califomia, provided that said images are architecturally compatible and approved by the Landlord. Type may be arranged in one or two lines of copy and may consist of upper and/or lower case letters. Fabrication: Each suite (with the exception of Suite A) to fabricate and install one internally illuminated hanging cabinet sign on the storefront All copy to be rout-out and push thru with translucent vinyl overlays. Cabinet, background, and brackets must be painted Matthews (or equivalent) semi gloss opaque to complement the colors (earth tones) of the building. Suite A to install dimensional letterS/logo painted approved color(s) from palette on pa~e 20. Size: Copy must fit comfortably on panel or fascia. Height of ca'oinet not to exceed 40", and must be mounted at least 9'-0" above grade. Length of cabinet not to exceed 12'.6". Overall dimensions for Suite A sign to be 3'-0. by 12'-6" with no letter or logo taller than 18". Copy: Tenant name/logo.ln addition, verbiage describing products and services is allowed. Design: The use of shapes and graphIcs consistent with the nature of the product to be advertised is encouraged, i.e. incorporate a hammer shape for a hardware store, a coat hanger shape for a dry cleaneT$. No two adjacent Tenants shaH have similar shapes. Colors: A diversity of colors is encouraged to create visual interest. letter/logo colors shall be selected that provide a significant contrast between them and the background color. Tenant to choose up to three colors (logos ex.empt tram this restriction) from palette on page 20. Other colors may be acceptable subject to the approval of the landlord and the Director of Planning. Tenants with nationally recognized logos are exempt from color restrictions. Illumination: CWHO fluorescent tubes (except lor Suite A, whiCh is illuminated by gooseneck lamps) ~' (;" ~' ~., ~.. rti [ , ~ r<""."T'" _,.....\"..L.! _:......'='l Rear of leasehold: If a Tenant chooses, non-illuminated letters could be installed on the rear of the leasehold space, facing Wolf Store Rd. These guidelines must be followed: . Material: %" clear acrylic painted Matthews (or equivalent) semi-gloss finish, to match color of letters from the front sign. Letters to be mounted directly to fascia. No two adjacent signs shall have the same color. No logos. . Size: Atlletters shall not exceed 15". Overall length not to exceed 60% of the length of leasehold. Single line only. . Font: Approved font is American Garamond upper-case. . No other material or treatment shall be accepted. MAX." ,-- T T T T -. o. .~ t ~~ /-------------~ ~ u u ur ESTE.RNfI\SIGN / ...,.,.eTI:"l!I I I '" ~ d ~ENTEREDDlRfCTlYOVERBACKDODR i~: ~- ~--------.------------.._~------------~---. = .~ j 8I:STBllRGliRS CLE^:NCR:!; TONY.S PIZZA w ..u.....~___""_,,;., J REAR OF LEASEHOLO SIGNAGE BUTTERFIELD STATION - MARCH 20, 2006 9 .,,,,,,,,,,,,,..",,I,,,,,''''U,,.,llh,,,,,;,,,..-,,.~....''.'d''.'''.'.~ INLlNE SHOP TENANT HANGING SIGN DETAILS SIGN EXAMPLES IA1 ~<(),~ ~ _ ~ II l~lLmmmmmm_mm_m__JJ- '1111 ~ I i ~ i- ~ . :.mmmm .~ L-. . , " ''-' ;i ~ } , 1 J I I I ~ 1 j 1 . i . , I I i I w ESTE!R~S I G N I ,o'. '- is Y 1!I T E...!!1 ! I. PLACEMENT OF INLlNE TENANT ILLUMINATED HANGING SIGN SCAlE:3J16"=1'-O' 8' CABINET rnr 2.BRACKET....R b .... PUSHTHRU_ ~ LETTER/GRAPHIC w r ~ .~ -;;._""v,W~~:~" ...,"....~"',~;.:.,.,.,"",- ~~ I I SlOE VIEW SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" (\; C")"j ~,,- ,,":,\. '-;-" ,",,' ...;/ (FLORIgT) '" F;; > ~ ~ '" 3l o '" !!! Iii ~,.."""> ~~L CLEANERS j ~ .~ ~ TONY#J WOOD FIRED PIZZA V BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 10 _ = MAJOR TENANT WALL SIGN LOCATION _ = MAJOR TENANT SECONOARY SIGN LOCATION _ ~ INLlNE SHOP TENANT SIGN LOCATION ~ ij;l o 0\'--"'0 o 'LV t~ ~ ~ ~ ~'l I J ~ "" I I , I "WESTEiRN~S IGN , I" n"H." , '" .."., .~.~~"'l.""i,J.iI;",~... "';Wi'~~~J,;:'~~'ci;'."';'~,",~'. PLOT PLAN. ANCHOR AND INLlNE SHOP TENANTS 0 0 0 .. .. .. .. = = <= <= '" ;;l ;;l ;;l m m ., n ~ SHOPS 11,331 S,F, 'LV 00 " ~= .. <= '" m .. - - - - - ,[]1IIIIIIILu ~- I '~~ ~ WOLF STORE ROAD ~.:...:..' ' '--= ANCHOR 2 (BEST BUY) 30,038 S.F. L v A~ J .1 ~I r..u:;-----;:..:;- ;- l~ ~ ~ ./ BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 2B, 2006 11 PAD T~NANT SIG~~1!! Type Face: Custom Tenant logotype/name with Owner approval. Size: The first sign placed on a storefront is not to exceed 1 square foot of sign area per lineal foot of frontage. The second sign placed on the rear of leasehold shall not exceed 80% of the area of the first sign. Colors: Up to three colors chosen from approved color palette on page 20. Logos are exempt from this restriction. The same color cannot be used on adjacent suites. Other colors may be acceptable subject to the approval of the Owner and the Director of Planning. Tenants with nationally recognized logos are exempt from color restrictions. Height: Maximum letter/logo height not to exceed 24 inches. When two lines of text are used overall height not to exceed 36 inches. Length: 75% of leased frontage Materials: A variety of wall sign treatments is encouraged. Each Tenant must incorporate one method of Illumination shown In the Design Standards as follows: . Open pan channel letters (Transparent face or no face with the inside of channel lettering colored the same color as the neon) . Lurna haze channel letters . Reverse pan channel letters . Plex face channel letters Note: No two adjacent tenants shall have the same exact method of illumination. Exposed tube neon not contained in channel letters is prohibited. ~ . . 0= ~~ = I !=cupAtj'Uf'e'N'AN'f' . ,SE.C,QN,PmLlN.E.C,Q,PY, 75% of leased frontage Copy: Tenant name/logo.ln addition, signage describing products and services Is allowed. SINGLE OR ODUBLE LINE COP~ ~; a: i~' i~ ~ j I I , . ,I :WESTE/~N~. SIGN - I' .Y.TE~. " , . ! AOORESS: NON-ILlUMINATEDNUM8ERS' ; PAINTroGLOSSBLACK "l 2:!.j)'Slt)Il.EfROtlT I fONl SWITZERLANO BOLOCONO. I "- NOTTOEXCEro3S'F.""~~" PROVlOEDIJVOWNER 2~'.". =rf\~~tWlJ -:-..1'" [~J\:O=fE}l~~!J rl - , "lfL 1]'( { I Hl-~' 8B'.6" l'I!IIlIIliI T I "~O~ I ~~~~ II r~I'-~ANT: I []D~I 21'.3"STOREfAONT 21".J.STOREfAOtlT ~ pio- TENANT-' L.________-' .,<':'" ,,,',W-:-r:~r,;~~;t~.t T t WEST ELEVATION -SCALE: 3/32" ~ l' .0" BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 12 ,c. ,h.l.. ,,,,,-" ~$X~Il<'11!..1.'?f:<:'f.0~'::i~'(1"J<i:-:;::,;.;'. :',; ,~ .1' '" !~ ~ :.;^' !j I , I M , . W EST E/R ~ ~! T~.~ , I \. STOREfRONT ~ I ~'l'~ I','.' C ~~I!: f(N~~!J ~i / EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" ~ 1'.0' ,,, " ,.~"."" ," I "'~"'Oi"""~~,'-,l0~.'<~~;~~,,,,,,-Ji';~... ,"""".",,~,. STOREFRONT STOREFRONT Il!II'mI .. C~~l!:f@~!J C ~~D= f(N~~! J E~r-Ti I> f -~ ,~". ~. STOREFRONT ,..---::::::' ~~.. e--------' :'\ C~~~!~N:7J ~ ffi--~D~ BUTTERFIELD STATION ' MARCH 20, 2006 13 ~ESIGN STANDARDS FOR PA~TENANTS: The purpose of establishing these guidelines is to ensure that each Tenant sign will contribute to the Center's success. High quality signage. which reflects the integrity ofthe architecture, will be encouraged. Tenant individual signs should incorporate a diversity of sign styles, icons, and materials to create retail excitement for the visitors. Encouraged sign treatments include: iJ N ~ <';' ;j, ~ ,1, ~t 1i-; ~ ~ j A, MIXED MEDIA FORMS AND EMBELLISHMENTS: - Dimensional, geometric shapes crieco representing a Tenant's production or service. . Sculpted wood, metal, or Sign foam forms. . Painted, polished, etched, or abraded materials. . Etched or sandblasted glass or acrylic. -Grid or mesh screens. - Glazed ceramic tile patterns or mosaic designs. -Cutorfabricatedsteel. - Dimensionalletterforms with seamless edges. . Opaque acrylic materials with matte finishes. -Fauxstoneeffect. - Gold, silver, orcopperJeaformetalllc paint finishes. -Oxidized and patlnafinishes. B.ILWMINATION: Tenant signage must incorporate one of the following methods: - Plex faced channel letters. - Reverse/halo channel neon. - Open and/or exposed channel neon. -Lumahazestyleletlers (No two adjacent tenants shall have the same exact method of illumination.) 'w EST ER ~~!Tr:~ " . ....""..~)~.~-"''''!''--"~~'.Y'.";.;1;>i';W..<:.:....:':::::1'' '." C, SIGN COLORS AND FINISHES: All Tenants' colors must come from approved color palette. and be approved by ttle Owner prior to fabrication. To assist in achieving a harmonious blend of color throughout the Center. the following guidelines are to be adhered to: - Sign colors should be selected to provide sufficient contrast against building background colors and be compatible with them. - Colors within each sign should be compatible. - Sign colors should provide variety and excitement. - Color of letter returns should contrast with face colors for optimum daytime readability. Interior of open channel letters should be colored the same coloras the neon. - Neon colors should compliment related signage treatments. D,lYPE SlYLES, The use of logos and distinctive type styles is encouraged for all Tenant signs. Tenants may adapt established type styles, logos, and/or icons that are used on similar locations operated by them in California andlorthe U.S. These images must be architecturally compatible and approved by the Owner. Type may be arranged In one (1) or two (2) lines of copy and may consist of upper and/or lower case letters. BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 14 , - = PAD TENANT WALL SIGN LOCATION I " . ;R ~ I ~ ~ , , , : . ! 'WESTE/RN~' SIGN _ I' eVSTEMS , I . I r - ) rril ,~~ _u.____) o(l " ~~&{jW=J ,/' o-Q --- ) .~ -~~,.""'''''''.,."".''l''''''....2''''''_..,:.; ,..,;ili,,,~;':<k,.;,,,"";'~"'-":' _ PLOT PLAN - PAD TENANTS " HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH .,...(10....."'.......0(>.......,.........',,.. ~ :::-:::::::::::......:::::::::::.....'::: ( ~JI I illll . Il~ ... ~'~ --.-~--t) ~""~ II~: 1 . ~;~;;;;;;;;;;;!!n1;ili;i~;i;~ii;- ./ ---- 6UIT~~ eulTI!I~ FO:ETAIL BUILDING ! BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 15 BANK PAD TENANT SIGNAGE _.'. <-.'"-- Amount 1 per frontage Height: Not to exceed three (3) feet. E' ~ . "Ii> =~ -'1ij <')~ 0, I -[nB'ANnl(m'pAtff'enN'AN'f 75%ofadjacenlslgn~andlenglh Area: 1 square foot of sign area per lineal foot of leased frontage is the maximum allowable area for all wall signs on each elevation. Length: 75% of adjacent sign band length Secondary Signs: No SINGLE OR DOUBLE LINE COPY, Materials: A variety of wall sign treatments is encouraged. Signs may use any acceptable treatment as outlined In Design Standards. Copy: Tenant name/logo. In addition. slgnage describing products and services is allowed. Type Face: Custom Tenant logotype/name with Owner approval. Colors: Custom colors okay with Owner approval. i,! 78'-0" FRONTAGE li i I ! 1 ! I j ! , ! j i j 'i lWEST&;/R~SIGN I ;' ...,_VIIITI:MII ~ I i \.. ~W~.oIl""'-l,."'''-",' -- -""_~.t;r,,"'~''''''<;,''''~'''',,''''"'' SIGN BAND ~ I ADDRESS: . /NON<ILWMINATEDNUMBERS -..... PAINTED GLDSS BLACK FDNTSWlTZERLANDBDLDCDND, NOT TO EXCEED 3 S,F. " " to ~rn--"/ -:rn~ 1..- ,0, ,0 H o ~ I j YI II ..A:::. , ------ .1 , ~"'--'-'--"-1 . . ':s=-,,=_CC'=j ~ :1 ~ 0 ~ ~~ ~.'II...: . ,~- --,<~< ....- -=- .....J NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" ----1 BUTTERFIELD STATION - MARCH 20, 2006 16 ,,,,",,-,,...,_ . ,~.j'.."..,_..~,"""..~ ,C 65'.2" II . ~--'--- .~Ir."'RAM'I ~ L:.-_ Il::. -1 Innn~~~~ ~o oj -c.<---" ~ __.~n~n\ ~~. .l.~~ ~o 0 I o-~) r- N~I I ;_.-~I~- J SI~N BAND v~L -----' ." ~ ~ \1 I II I . ~ EAST ELEVATION .......... t- ~ I I ".'; I ~ 'Nil ",ftd'(-O -- --- '" i------ --..0:,. - ~-- o =' o OF .J WEST ELEVATION SIGNBANO _____ ____ _______ I __________ ",yl:::i~rn~r-fr .....:..::..:........ . i j W EST EiR ~ '. S I G N .' .. IS YilT II: '" II , , " , i ~ ----:;-.. 7"..'"-'- =1 ~Ti' rn-';j: ~--'" f r '~I ~-$nl JII LJ L---- = = ". I ""","",.,,11II- SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" =1 '.0" BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 17 -- ~'^"~i;:.'.\ik...,~:;.o;~',~'J:.""i.~'="'"".,.""/;';,':;;;~_.,,,,. , f1 ROOFW.TERIAl: EAGLE CONCRffi TILE #5504CEOAA 1[ ~ , I C'i WESTE/R ~~~T~M~ DIRECTIONAL SIGN DETAILS A >0' rt "" J'.n. .." Directional Sign Scale: 11/2"=1'.0" -\" .! 'h'''''',11"", lfI'!".....,....._~."'.'c~":l.w.).~,;:~_ "'''"-'''' ':;.o.,:i;n:~~';":':'1;~,->_./it.;....,.;,:;. ...".",,,,c...,'... "",,-, ....',..~. A >0' f4 ....~~ ... '" Parking > Drive-Up > !"'; ATM 11:. !.. Il'l ~~;?",;"..-",;,,~~:,-,.ia""';~~""~l ~.~?:-ri:~~~.~~~~~~;~~,~:.:-~~ ~~j _ .;;....{::e,~!:T..;.....~!l~ ~c-::_, 0_...."'_...._....___..._- };l~;~~~~;~.crE~~~ .....;;..~;:.:-__1,'..~~';,_,.,.......:..~-;:::r-...." c..;;.i-;........!!'~J~:.,'~~~'!_~!S'LZ;:;...~~!~~ r-c<'~."..rt:. ~1""<-', ..~liG:;1ot.......~.,,'..'.~~...ll.. ~~c.oo.~.~.~.~.....~'O;';",~~.._~'"" .. - ~::. Q_...l!'I--"""'"'~......-.~,... ' - ~~~~~~E..j~~; ~ ......;~...~-rJ/l......,j~'7.'J...--t"~~-';..n . .'.- ":.,~~i11I'1lBll.",'i:..:."~.. 3'.0' .." Directional Sign NOTES: PelimatelSilJrc-ErttlllnCe/Exit f'IIomHv/llmariJd, riDuble-sided Material: Painted aluminum composite sheet metal panel on base with rock to match building material. Eve to be fabricated from wood painted brown to match proposed monument signs. (TBD) 'Colm!: "'11II1":",.,,,11: ""'t;~~jTgmIQOC \l.l.... ......i"_~ ,1>4 Or.,""il_~ ".. ilJltlllll""'--= 'Iit~ ~ ~ IV'Pl': "".rt...lI.~&A.llt"y. ""It.' Mill"''; ~G""iS.; oI~1:1l1l0 . Fabriciltorto confirm ITlOS"QO:l and olrtG'11 diroction with Woll. Fil'gO Baol;, P'IOf Ic1ltblicatrQn BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 18 ~; k~ ;. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" WESTE'R . w~~'" " . ~SIGN "".Vl!ITEMl!I TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGN DETAILS ~, ~~e7' , ;''') I " :;'~,-- Clearance 91-0" ,090 aluminum - Painted to Match Regal Red .J Traffic Control Sign Scale; 11/2"=1'.0" NOTES: o Ma,f1riel; PlliniedalUrTllnum'Omposnllshflat metDlpan,lcm polntsdpost FabricDtDr 10 determine appfoprioto thickneu Dfslllll1tmllt~ljordesilJnedsillnsize o Colors. ,..- ~t''''IIII::i~,1;<<l .\tI.I"...\cojIfool:......~."""',: Iol.,,~ PAN1tlN! x<< A~c."t:S,.,aol" \0'.,.... .~ M..<"rJ.l'jl0NE4~[ III 1~~/~,.~.,~~L';"""~,",,,\~.._,,':' ~..._~' ,;.~. .:..__ . TVIIB ."'" ,.,,,,,,.MI.lIoft~._'~t:lC'IO .FabricatorUlcortfirmmlUlIQQ~and Ilfrowdirel:"llollwithWullsFllqtoB'n~ priortllrntmClllian BUTTERFIELD STATION ' MARCH 20, 2006 19 - = BANK PAD TENANT WALL SIGN LOCATION I r t it ~ I j i - i i W EST' ;' , E/R~"S . .-' I G , !' "YOu.~ I - ( I Ii ~I I -- '1- " ~ \L , @ ~;~.::.:;;(~;:,.,,~;.;)C~,~< ~M"";.. Gl PLOT PLAN . BANK PAD TENANTS ~Ir] I .t SU -l "~ [OJ I S1 [Ol 1 .D'0 ~ :J , BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 20 r , J:i ~ I :; , i , / WESTE/RN~' SIGN .. . Y. T I: M. I ! SIGN COLOR PALETTE WHITE #230.20 BURGUNDY #230.49 YELLOW #230.015 EMERALD GREEN #230.126 REO #230.33 BLUE #230.67 ACCEPTABLE COLORS FOR INLlNE AND PAD TENANT SIGNAGE SHOWN ABOVE, ANY ONE SIGN MAY USE A MAXIMUM OF THREE COLORS. LOGOS ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS RESTRICTION. OTHER COLORS MAY BE ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING. TENANTS WITH NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED LOGOS ARE EXEMPT FROM COLOR RESTRICTIONS, ..,.. I." ,,,...,,,,,, ",,-",..' .....,....~.""s:.&..~~."-;.".~.;,....""i;t:>:,,~'"";:c~::.'J>.....:..~'"'_i.:...,:;: BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 200, 21 , ;; ~.. Ii. '," l"(' 1..\ ~ i1 I I I 1 I METHODS OF ILLUMINATION FOR WALL SIGNS . PLEX FAC~D CHANNELLETIER wllh THRDUGH FACE ILLUMINATIDN Use standard aluminum construction with Matthews (or equivalent) semi- gloss acryliC polyurethane finish. Face color to be from approved color pallette. Trim cap and returns to contrast with face color. Illuminate with 30 ma. neon or LED . REVERSE PAN CHANNEL LETIER with HALD ILLUMINATlDN Use standard aluminum construction with Matthews (or equivalent) semi. gloss acrylic polyurethane finish. Paint faces and returns from approved color pallette. illuminate with 30 ma. neon or LED PLEX FACED CHANNEL LmER REVERSE PAN CHANNEL LmER . DPEN PAN CHANNEL LmER with EXPOSED NEON ILLUMINATION Use standard aluminum construction with Matthews (or equivalent) semi- gloss acrylic polyurethane finish. Paint returns dart:: when against light background Paint Interior to match neon illumInate with '30 ma. neon . LUMA HAZE CHANNEL LmER with THROUGH FACE AND HALO ILLUMINATION Use standard aluminum construction with Matthews (or equivalent) semi- gloss acrylic polyurethane finish. Face color to be from approved color pallette. Trim cap and returns to contrast witt! face color. Illuminate with 30 ma. neon or LED OPEN PAN CHANNEL LmER LUMA HAZE CHANNEL LmER /-'. 'WESTE/RN~"SIGN . ,'.' s v. T II: M. . . ~ , i " BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 22 .. -- ~-_'~'~~'-~<.':"'-,-,. '~';:Li;lli!:!~;,S:~,':"'","'~,",,-1 !il.~ti~~NTRY FREESTANDING MDNUME~I ~Ig'!! Materials: Double sided fabricated freestanding sign with smooth metal finishes. Main sign to be painted Frazee 8214M "Tobacco Road." Center ID to be reverse-pan halo-lit channel letters. Tenant copy to be 2" deep aluminum pans painted Frazee 6212M "Millet," routed out and pushed thru Y2"acrylic with vinyl overlays,lIluminated with fluorescent lamps. Columns to be finished with EI Dorado Stone Durango Mountain Ledge Stone. Quanllly: 1 10'-6" 8',0" 1'-0' TENANT PANELS 38" ROOF WIDTH 18" Sign Area: 12' maximum height 100 square feet sign area location: Entrance drlveway planter Landscaping: 200 square feet required at the base of each sign to Include perennials,' annuals, or other plants that provide additional color and they shall be planted ,and:> "~ replanted seasonally to maintain year-round color. :,;/~~~.:;::;;._', ,,,,::'''''''''''''''': ~ ,:.;~'>, ,-' ',' ROOF:MATEFlIAL: EA LECONCRETE,YILE ~ ,..: ,j' .55~4cE'DAR ':eJ>" All monument Signs will be located outside of the public ri9ht-or:waya~~:' site vISIBILITY area as defined In section 17.06.050.K of the Dev ~ S ,.1 ~ if: '" 6 W \! ~i ~1 ~,~ :~ ~ I / w E ST~,R ~~!T~"'~ , I I SCALE: W' = l' .o~ 8UTTERFIElO STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 23 "!:l:~~.;c~"w:;';~;;.,;,~_,,".,,_,~,. ~!!f~Q.R_ TENANT FREESTANDING MDNUMEN~ SlliN. Malerlals: Double sided fabricated freestanding sign with smooth metal finishes. Tenant copy to be internally illuminated channel letter to match custom colors (tbd). Illuminated with white neon. Background color to match ~Best Buy" blue. Base to match building materials. Colors to match building colors (tbd). Quanllty: 1 Sign Area: Max. 100 square feet Location: Northeast corner of the property, at least 5 feet behind property line. Landscaping: 100 square feet required at the base of each sign to include perennials, annuals, or other plants that provide add~ional color and they shall be planted and replanted seasonally to maintain year-round color. All monument signs will be located outside of the public right-ot.way and outside the site visibility area as defined in section 17,06.050.K of the Development Code. I' (~' ~,' ~ ~ ~ i" '< '} .;o1f,J(;1 F i"FNAf.JT nnlJRI F FAr.F MnNllMFNT ! W EST :/R ~ ~ ~ ,c:.~ '-'lZ__!"Y_~~~~'~":;;:.,,: 3S"FtOOfWIDTH 24" PILlAIlWIOTH ,II ,,~;B~~T" II '" " " BUTTERFIELD STATION . MARCH 20, 2006 24 ATTACHMENT 3 PC RESOLUTION 06-_ G:IPlanning\2005IPA05.0294 Buttertield Station SIGPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.docB PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0294 A COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE "BUTTERFIELD STATION" COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER, (A.P.N.'S 952-200-002, 011, 012, AND 013) LOCATED ON HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BETWEEN MAHLON VAIL AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD Section 1. Incha K. Lockhart, representing Vail Properties Butterfield Stage, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA05-0294, a Comprehensive Sign Program "Application", in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, Section 2. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. Section 5. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 6. by reference, The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated Section 7. Findinos. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.28.080.B of the Temecula Municipal Code: A" As conditioned, the proposed sign program will preserve and improve the appearance of the City as viewed from Highway 79 South Road and the allowable signage is appropriate for effective business signage by combining common design elements" B. The sign program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants" C. The proposed sign program, as conditioned, satisfies the intent or objectives of the Development Code and will enhance the development. As conditioned, the proposed program results in appropriate signage that compliments the building architecture and aesthetics. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0294 Butterfield Station SIGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.docl Section 8. Environmental Compliance. The project is categorically exempt from environmental review (Class 11 - Accessory Structures) pursuant to section 15311 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 15311 applies when a project consists of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory to existing commercial, indus,rial, or institutional facilities, including on-premise signs. Section 9. Conditions, That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Comprehensive Sign Program Application, as set forth on attached Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 10. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19'h day of April, 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No" 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of T emecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19'h day of April, 2006, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2005\PAOS.0294 Butterfield Station SIGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.doc2 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0294 Butterfield Station SIGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.doc3 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA05-0294 Project Description: A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Butterfield Station shopping center (PA05-0254), (A.P.N.'s 952- 200-002, 011, 012, and 013) located on Highway 79 South between Mahlon Vail and Butterfield Stage Road MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: April 19, 2006 Expiration Date: April 19, 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of this Project 1" The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 Oa(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Garne Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents" City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action, The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. G:\Planning\2005\PAOS-0294 Bunerfield Station SlGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.doc4 3. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void, By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 4. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 5. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 6, The applicant shall revise the sign program to state the maximum sign area for the face of the single tenant monument sign shall not exceed 21 square feet per face. 7. The erection of signs on the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Sign Program, contained on file with the Planning Department. 8, Signs placed within the California Department of Transportation (CaITrans) "clear zone" along Highway 79 South shall require a line of sight analysis to demonstrate that vision will not be obscured for vehicles entering and exiting the site. 9. Landscaping installed around freestanding monument signs shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease, The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological /cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work, Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. 11. Illumination of all signs shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance No. 655 to reduce impacts on the Mount Palomar Observatory" G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0294 Butterfield Station SIGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.doc5 Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 12, A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0294 Butterfield Station SIGP\Planning\Draft PC Reso & COAs.doc6 ITEM #9 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION April 19, 2006 Emery Papp TITLE: Senior Planner A Major Modification to a Development Plan including final architectural elevations for the multi-family residential buildings and retail/office buildings, replacing two speculative building pads with a drug store totaling 17,500 square feet (Rite-Aid); modification of the recreation center, and modification of the residential roof plans (PA06-0018), and a Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru pharmacy (PA06-0019) ~ Approve with Conditions D Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial o Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) ~ Notice of Determination o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan (Section) 15162 DEIR G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.0018 Temecula Village. Major MODlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: MDMG,lnc" Date of Completion: January 20, 2006 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 19, 2006 General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Pianned Development Overlav 5. Temecula Vlillaqe Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Hiqh Residential (H)-Portofino Apartments Low Medium Residential (LM)- Starliqht Ridqe Residential Tract Low Medium Residential (LM)- Starliqht Ridqe Residential Tract Medium Residential (M)- Vacant Lot Area: 15.26 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio: 185,993 square feeV 23% Landscape Area/Coverage: 357,260 square feeV 68% Parking Required/Provided: 253 required/ 313 provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY The Temecula Village project is located south of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Road and east of the Moraga Road / Rancho California Road intersection. On March 3, 2000, Barton L, Buchalter, representing The MJW Property Group, submitted Planning Application No. PAOO"0140 to construct 160 multi-family residential units on approximately 15.26 acres and nine (9) retail/office buildings totaling approximately 71,100 square feet on 7,71 acres located on Rancho California Road approximately 300 feet east from Moraga Road and located within the Planned Development Overlay 5 (PDO-5) Temecula Village. The project was presented to the Planning Commission on February 20, 2002 and the Planning Commission moved to approve the project with the following condition: "The applicant shall submit the architectural design of the apartment buildings for the Planning Commission review. The Architecture of the apartment shall be consistent with the architecture of the office/commercial building," The current applications were submitted on January 20, 2006 by Larry Markham, representing MDMG, Inc, Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recornmended Conditions of Approval. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.0018 Temecula Village. Major MODIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 ANALYSIS The Major Modification application consists of five parts: (1) architectural elevations for the retail/office buildings; (2) replace two speculative building pads with a drug store totaling 17,500 square feet (Rite-Aid) and a drive-thru pharmacy; (3) architectural elevations for the multi-family residential units; (4) modification of the roof plans; and (5) modification to the recreation center. Architectural Elevations for Office/Commercial Architecture: The architectural style of the buildings can be described as "Eclectic Mediterranean", which is characterized by clay tile roofs, arches, heavy use of stucco, and flat cornice parapets. The commercial buildings will also incorporate canvas awnings and wood trellises as accent treatment. Each retail/office building will have custom tower elements as distinguishing features. The residentiai buildings will have a complementary architectural style, but have a distinctive "look" that is different from the commercial development. The colors and materials proposed for the development will consist of earth tones similar to colors used throughout Temecula and typical for the architectural styles, The detailed architectural plans are consistent with the underlying concept plans previously approved by the Planning Commission. Retail Store lRite-Aid) Site Plan: The previously approved site plan showed Pad "D" as a restaurant and "E" as retail space. The applicant is proposing to replace Pad "D" and "E" with a Rite Aid drug store. The proposed Rite Aid will be located on Rancho California Road, on the northeast corner of the commercial property. It will be approximately 17,500 square feet. Architecture: The architectural style of this building can be described as "Eclectic Mediterranean", which is characterized by clay tile roofs, arches, heavy use of stucco, and flat cornice parapets. This building will also incorporate canvas awnings and stone veneer as an accent treatment, similar to the other commercial buildings on-site. The building will incorporate stone veneer on the base of the building, and metal trellis work to break up the mass of the building, There will be a canopy over the drive-thru pharmacy window; however, it has been designed to be incorporated into the building. The canopy will have the same base as the building and have the same parapet as the building. Four-sided architecture has been incorporated into the building, The architectural plan is consistent with the architecture plan approved for the entire center. Landscaping: In order for the drive-thru to be approved, a Conditional Use Permit must be approved with the project. The project has been conditioned to provide enhanced landscaping northwest along Rancho California road to screen any stacking of vehicles, The building also proposes a loading dock facing the interior of the parking lot, which has been conditioned to provide enhanced landscaping in order to screen any trucks in the loading dock. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0018 Temecula Village. Maior MODIPlannlnglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 Parking and Circulation: The Department of Public Works has analyzed the proposed traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR and Planned Development Overlay 5. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Access to the proposed Commercial Center and residential will be provided by three access points. The proposed project provides 313 parking spaces, while the parking requirement for this size of use is 253" One loading space has been provided facing the interior of the parking lot, thereby meeting the loading space requirement of Section 17.24.060 of the Development Code. Staff has reviewed the access and circulation of the proposed project and finds that the proposed project will meet the requirements set forth in the City of Temecula's Development Code. Drive-Through: The Development Code requires all drive through facilities to have a Conditional Use Permit. Staff has insured that all requirements have been met in order to provide a drive-through facilities including pedestrian walkways not to intersect the drive through aisles, aisle be a minimum width of eleven feet, sufficient stacking area to accommodate six cars, and that all speakers be located so as to protect adjoining residential areas from excessive noise, Architectural Elevations for Multi-Familv Units Architecture: The proposed architectural styles for each building conform to the City's Design Guidelines and will be compatible with the architectural character of the surrounding area. The project proposes the use of various architectural elements designed to break up the building mass such as awnings, iron work, painted wood beams and painted cement plaster with reveal lines. Techniques such as varying the roof planes, introducing unique elements to each building, and varying the color and materials will help to create "visual interest" in the site" The detailed architectural plans are consistent with the underlying concept plans previously approved by the Planning Commission, Roof Plans: The roof plans were originally approved with an open well roof, the applicant is proposing full enclosed roofs. Full enclosed roof are effortless to maintain and will enhance the quality and look of the building, Recreation Building: The original site plan approved a 3,778 square foot clubhouse with a pool and spa, since then the applicant has modified the plans for the clubhouse, to include an exercise room, pool and spa, As proposed, the clubhouse and exercise room will total a 2,297 square feet, the elevations will look exactly like the apartment buildings. The recreation center will be located on the main entrance of the apartment buildings. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Negative Declaration) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). G:\Planning\2006IPA06.0018 Temecula Village. Major MODIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, Planned Development Overlay 5 and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Major Modification (PA06-0018) based on a finding of consistency with the original findings and the Conditional Use Permit (pA06-0019), based upon the findings and the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Development Plan PA06-0018 (Code Section 17.05-010) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city, The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop an office/retail center and 160 apartment units is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Office Prolessional and Medium Density Residential for the site. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare" The overall development of the land as conditioned is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The development plan for the site is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the Development Code and related Planned Development Overlay document. Provisions have been made to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes. Conditional Use Permit PA06-0019 (Code Section 17.04.010.E) 1, The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code, The proposal for a drive-thru facility is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the land use standards in the General Plan and the City's Development Code, and Planned Development Overlay 5, Temecula Village, The site is, therefore, properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. G:\Planning\2006IPA06.0018 Temecula Village. Major MODlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the project site is a commercial use on commercially zoned land. The building is designed to enhance the surrounding area and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The drive-through facility will provide sufficient vehicle stacking distance and will incorporate landscaping to achieve on.site screening, 3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The conditional use is a request for a drive-through facility on commercially zoned land" The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed drive.through facilities without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code. 4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community" Staff has reviewed the proposed project and feels it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the community. ATTACHMENTS 1, Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7 2. Site Plan - Blue Page 8 3. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 9 4. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 10 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Initial Study - Blue Page 11 6, Mitigation Monitoring Plan - Blue Page 12 7. Original Conditions of Approval- Blue Page 13 G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.001B Temecula Village. Major MOOIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0018 Temecula Village. Major MOOIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 . AvEN\bFvi,5i~J-ADERA T -1 - T~. . > . , I 'I ! I 1 I II: ;: 1 ;_ ~A';'E}~~D~~I~ 'pE~ SOL, , / ~",'f. 0~ ,;f-'<>' S'" . >(,'t'~ S;.,~~;j\S ' ____I :<: 1>1 _.,("), i~'- i~.'- i:;L_ ,." /' I /./, - I~'I'T_ \ ' /< " ~,--, \ '/.J::t:/, -I ! \ \ \_--'''0:: )- , ,~',~i~~g~_~i\5\~>/ ~ / > ': Ji,.)1 \gi jOi -,>-i ;}, lor I; .:'l'__LJJ " ~ 0 " "i'~' ;-~.... / ~Cj #/<:; ~ 1 I i , ..-c' i I I i --j j 111 \~\ \01 "~! Q' ,,"' \-;:0\ ,0\ \. \ \ _____ ~'IFORNI,A. RD RN'lc-t-\OC,...... i '", !-~ \ , '-,~ .--~..-- "j \ .,. \/\./ .-'-- ~----'" \ \ / \fS'90LlNAS F ':..!,\,::-v' ~.)// / -r /~ ~, _; ,r-_ ~ I ". r-"--l le>JP..NQ,E,Pl ,~ ;-. rrl -\ "'\ ,".1 \ ! 111 ) /<:/\~\~~~)/::'2\\\:\\'\ , _'\~',\~'~>:':.""':' ','( >.~- .," \ , //. -< />. <', \.~""',',>> ".-/ ---<.,. \. ' v /", "'/" , y' ~, ,.' /~ , / " I ,:,'/\"-~',.(":/ ,,//\,>-, !! l, \'/ r"'--'-'''-/'' \,\/\ ' i / '" \, , ' "" , ,"\~,-_.J..' \ " --- / ., , "--', .", \...' i- \ " " Fr~ ~- \ , I i I \ '- r---. r, " , -1 , -~",,-----'.- , " \ ''I \ --- " \ \. -----. '''''\ ~\ .//' - // ~\ ;: \./ -\ r .-.-\ , /' . ., '\ "y') ,-' " '././ \", / , \'I---.J1 / '" \ ",,/, \...,~ "-j I~ , . /' '\'~, ~}, :; -', :Joi~~ " ,'., -< " ; >- I Z, , --'" // /', ''>',</~/) :;~ ~<~ ~)--~ /~l~~ -: / / "_' / "' / I'v"\/.c- -'~,. . '" , " ,~" \ I >"" I I - /,/', I /, ,~~y.,." ).." "",,, \~\-\ / ',\ 'J.--./,<", ).fl:' J . \ " ;~", ':," - (t'I~ --- " ./ ,i \ I I \ ":s;:j~ (\ / ' I V ( \1\ / '. , \ \ \.\' \ .,,, '\ .. . -' -j' , ., -' " \\ ~ \'t~"" \' ,~ \ /~7^\/ ,\'\ /:~. /' \-.. ~<----\; 0>/ >'~'<~--z._/,/\\,,/' ,,>-, /' ,-;, , \\\ 1" ,,: 1"'7-_---. <--''1,,/), \ ,F/ 1; 1; 'P '" -'- o ~ ; z -s " ~ Wlll.'Ov.'OR , ''::' \ " A~No,PL "cr-\ l. I , ' ;; , ~, f?:- ' ,- 1_.. ,*.p/ R~'tf,. ,. . _",.___:.,~~'t"; !<" y,/\,/, ,~~'l-#~::i.)<2?-,~~~k,',~' -,1/' .., ,-q;-:" y' " "0~~~~f~:--" , , MER,S~Y CT; CHURCH-tU, 'CT " .-1.- , ' , , NE.~V(A ~N '\ I'; '. , , o -J; ~i '-t,., , ( , \')~+~~~if~ .\ , , ,. . .)/ ~~./ >/ -;~ \ ~/.\ ~:~~o,_/_(:'i , ~c' ,/_' , :><r .' , '. i." ,'\--- \ \ / \, _ ~'pE.cr ,/~':l'--f--_ :iJ' , :0..' -" /,,>,\ -.-'. "'I -'''-. ,,1/ " ''>'~,.l ,'t*~f?;2 " .'"'- ,--. f-. r~r'h-,1!/.__, .~I '0 I ':'-:.::,' , r---:-'-i~' 'I I I .L..' --. ) -t-' /~, L \, ~_i :,____L LI L " lO!"..9. VA!,~EY OR.., ---L ') !--- ';- '.l_J_ ;'! i i I In ~ .J I L...l .J..-1 _ j -I -'}, ~~~:= --, - _!-HL,(y ~ (-.: \ ''''1 \! " -r--WA,YDR" pr~jeC;S'ite I'~, \,..=1 ;'___! i!'> ~ \ ~ r---\'\,//\ I I.. \ v/\Jr..:" , , .\ \.-. .~ ., -<,/ .x/~ '\:~%,,:~ ,',\,,' , J '.--1 /'.~( ~>,/\%v/~<,~,., 4 . i 1/ ,~,- \ /.~\ -'\ .:'-, /),.' --'" /\,~,<_"~-_-'\r~,/ ~ _ /\ ~ _ '~" _).-;/A~,~./~,/ ''". .F\,' .F),:'~, /(.,. , / ' ";---. ,~ " 1'\ i I "J" "_..1 /, './ ,:<,~. , /< '~--........ '-- ',-- 1,320~ Foe< ..J \ ATTACHMENT NO.2 SITE PLAN G:\Planning\2006IPA06.001B Temecula Village. Major MOD\PlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 -- - - - -:-~::;:;~..::.~.::-=- .',c:~',i--~::: ~~t~~~~~ ;:'f':" - - ~-" ;-~ . :~ -=-ll"'iiiiiCiliFCJ.iih7iiijj,':'fijj'-;;",.. i~ ,,'_ .u._. ; __ =~~~~~~~~~ ~~.~~~ __.r:. ~,r~~~'i:l~ JI~; '.~ - .~-- ., :':'.."".;..:.," 'R.iJ.l6.tO~-I~NIAROAO ,..._""'~..iji,T '-'",'Y" ,~, ',""", ;"'." ",' :'.:"t ~~;. .~\ I'; ;'i '~ I' ;t, . .1" 'hi ~- : ..':.:.c..::=--B.@'tl:,;~'" . -EiQT,.11.;!,~-' '-~~~~~i:~ "', . ~7..'. i- ': : "," ,'~"/; :..-..O'.~~~ '~'-'~:::'~- , ""'.." lj1,l,C --~~- ~.;.,~~. , .._" . -+ ;:.._~,~- . ":--~k.;~'~~';l'f( "'~:ic__"' ~..,.=~ ..;.'--< G CON~_EPJUAL G~ADING. PLA}J PA#OO-O/40 p!>r!>"-RrD ;:l\ID M~E"ENTGfiOUl'I~" ~~~~:~~;r;-~~._-- ",,;/-,,::j'''i'~,\:{~.,.:,,',, SH[['lOcl ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.001B Temecula Village. Major MODlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 9 ~"" ': "' 0, " (/.-:~"-~".'''"'-- I u I ,,_ I , ~:'" \',~LY n J~ --~ ~I~~~ nil',li I, LL~ ~.~""L.d l ':!.OO\.UlCl"iTO,..,.......tv4'""'" i""" . i f-,-," ....""............_,.00.. C~T?~J} : L-, ~. ~'" , I '" \.'r ~ ~....'~::; ; L ,{, 'oy U', --, "0.1 -.....-- " ."-l.....-..-..-~ I """OO1I:I~""""'.tA -~~ ~~f~ TtwIlUWPrur-l'G.... 1UI_...........~ c-..hI\,CAI.Jn)""",tlJlllll ''',,_IU' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS" PAD A TEMECULA VILLAGE CENTER SOUTH ELEV A TJON UIl1,filf" ?ir""""';1~ ~.r~~...".; ; ~~ EAST ELEVATION ItlU:I . R..rrE .AID #6477-0:1 R..A.N"CHO CALIFOR..l"-rr..A &. IVlc>RAGC> TE.M..ECULA.~ CA.. .....""n<> '1'"r.I'""O" SIIERWINWILLlAI\.IS SW2l\5~ ""I-IARV[STGOU)" ~Ht.KWIN WILLIA~.S ~W'.J.4~"SUMME~ WHITr::" ~H\:RWIN WilLIAM'S SW~()5()DORMER BROWN ~HERWIN WILUAr>-IS SW"~()I ""GOL.DE.N GAT(" . SUNI3i{Ll..LA COLOItS ~. <;'VNBRELI..A CULOKS "462:: "TERRA COTTA . oLDORAlJOSTONE "S[QUOIA RUSTIC" ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . " > J -, i f~.." I ' , I :!O , I , , . I I ~ ! I i .1.,.. I f; I ,,: , , , , , , ~ I , I I I , ~ > r-, IJ I ' I I , I I ~ Jl.. : I I r .-/;) ~ ~/ : I I : I I t ~ RITE AI D SHOP D PAD c 1109.00+ (RETAIL) 17,500 SF - ( . ii' I / I *-~-- ~ ~--' ,.', ...- -.". ,~~.~ '11I}1II SYMBOL PLANTING LEGEND 8~ 00 06 EBo @ 8 @ D ~ m ABBREVIATION I BOTANICAL NAME TREES: RHU, LAN. RHUS LANCEA KOE, BIP. KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA PLA, A, 'B,G: PLATANUS ACERIFOUA 'BLOODGOOD' LAG" F, 'T: LAGERSTROEMIA FAUERI 'nJSCARORA' COCo PLU, COCOS PLUMOSA PIN, ELD. PINUS ELDARICA SCH, MOL, SCHINUS MOLLE UO, S:P.A: UOUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA ' PALO ALTO' POD. GRA' PODOCARPUS GRACIUOR PYR. C. 'A: PYRUS CALLERYANA 'ARISTOCRAT' LARGE SHRUBS: ESC. FRA. ESCAU.ONIA FRADESI PHO. FRA, PHOTINIA FRASERI PHD, TEN, PHORMIUM lENAX MEDIUM SHRUBS: ABE. GRA. ABEUA GRANDlFLORA 'EDWARD GOUCHER' PIT, T, 'V: PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA 'VARIEGATA' NAN. 001.4, NANDINA DOMESTlCA RAP, I. 'J.E: RAPHIOLEPIS INOICA 'JACK EVANS' PEN, S, 'C: PENNISETUM SETACEUM 'CUPREUM' GRE. NOE" GREVlLLEA NOELU SMALL SHRUBS 8< MULCH: HEM, HYB. HEMEROCALLlS HYBRIDS AGA. A, 'O.A: AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS 'OUEEN ANNE' PIT. T" 'W: PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA 'WHEELERI' WOOD MULCH DESIGNER WOOD CHIPS SLOPE SHRUBS 8< GROUNDCOVER: ACA RED. ACACIA REDO LENS MYO. PAR. MYOPORUM PARVIFOLlUM VINES: CLY. CAL PAR, TRI. LAWN FES, ARU" CLYTOSTOMA CALLESTEGIOIDES PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA I FESTUCA ARUNDIACEA I COMMON NAME AFRICAN SUMAC CHINESE FLAAtE TREE LONDON PLANE TREE RED CREPE MYRTLE OUEEN PALM MONDELL PINE CALIFORNIA PEPPER SWEETGUM FERN PINE FLOWERING PEAR ESCALLONIA FRASER'S PHOTINIA NEW ZEALAND FLAX GLOSSY ABEUA VARIEGATED TOBIRA HEAVENLY BAMBOO INDIAN HAWTHORN PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASS PROSTRATE GREVlLLEA DAYULY ULY OF THE NILE WHEELER'S DWARF TOBIRA WOOD MULCH PROSTRATE ACACIA PROSTRATE MYOPORUM LAVENDER TRUMPET VINE BOSTON rvY I WATERSAVER II I SIZE I NUMBER 5 GAL" 37 15 GAL, 79 15 GAL 24 36" BOX 20 7' CLR.TR. 18 15 GAL, 131 15 GAL, 144 15 GAL 60 24" BOX 162 24" BOX 53 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 5 GAL 1 GAL 1 GAL 5 GAL 2" DEEP I REMARKS DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8' HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN" DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8' HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN, DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8' HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN" DOUSLE STAKE/ 10-12' HEIGHT &: 6-7' SPREAD MIN, PLANT PER DETAIL DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8' HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN" DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8' HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN, DOUBLE STAKE/ 7-8" HEIGHT 8< 2-3' SPREAD MIN. DOUBLE STAKE/ 8-9' HEIGHT 8< 3-5' SPREAD MIN, DOUBLE STAKE/ 8-9' HEIGHT 8< 3-5' SPREAD MIN, FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< SPREADING FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY FULL 8< BUSHY ~ REO'D. APPLY TO ALL PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT SLOPES TYP. 1 GAL FULL 8< SPREADING 0 4' O.C. FLATS ~ REO'D, PLANT TRIANGULAR SPACED 0 12" O.C, (SLOPES ONLY) 5 GAL 5 GAL ATTACH TO WALL ATTACH TO WALL I HYDROSEED I ~ REO'D. I nJRF TYPE TALL FESCUE 0 15 LBS./ 1,000 S,F. .~ ~' _~~_. _ .. . . . . ~.. \I' ViIifu,' ,,, ,~__ ~ _ S':~ .' . r [I .Y1Jlwiiilt'i", ,., '- ~ _,,. , . '1 ' . _ -- .. .fI. <- _" 1Ij:.:J-1:::G.:... ;""11' \ ,[' '" ' ' b1l' ----- ". "" ,,-,-,'~~-'I' ~. " " :7~ 2~ I~: ~;T. ,,'If' ~':;;,,"1.0.'" .. ',' l , , -r ;"i,';' ,,' li,I:WHllliUlIHUiilllllilllllOO' , .- ';;J]f!dl'l~1m! .'" Illi!ljil" ...... __ I!JI'I.~,!,"i:" 'r1"""- _, ---" !i'IL . \ ' I~ J . !IlIil'i: i.], ~ Front Elevation 1/8" ~ 1'.0" \'::';:;'" ,'-- 2.J-g >.....: c = 50:: IIi c ;> :..::: U c; <: DU E c; C ~~]~ ~2~<( "2 ~::; ~ :=J;::M~ (:; , ::: 3f-<"'"\d - ;::! ~ =: .-:(,--o<=.> ~Mf- ,~;:~ -~.' J. "" I' .'. .~." .,. .. ;:F ,. 'rc,c 1 " '1I11l11l'", "I"'" ... - :D .;,::'1\,' "mr "j,.i,i; ",~- - _,,,,,, ""J ~'I' ..l,' ' . ,fL"-'''II'~'''' ~,'--'. Len Sid~ EI ' 0..: evallon 1/8" ~ 1'.0" Right Side Elevatio'n 1/8" ~ 1'.0" ~;~:,:~:~,.'" TCl1lccub \"ilbgc' C,I"r ~d, '".' v",,, ,..""",,' cm~ [A'g~nd ",-,,,, , '" 'Hlillll"ijllttl,_., II r~II~llml~~i~~~'!III:~~I!III!I;irlljjiH;i' , . . r~\",,-,. "'" III ""'":. ""'" '~I Ill. !iI!i!!~iIIlfl:!j~Ii!' lll..a 11\II IIIil .. ""', rv:", ~ Ef1 mE! .' , .," ,CEll'. "I I~,,,,,r TOOl' I 'I'''r'''' I ~ ~_:,~:',:::',5:',;::t ".,", " """" Rear Elevation I/W' ~ 1'.0" A3.A.4 " "\<~I' ""'~"'-"n . . . . 17.[~ . . . . ,:\, liIllmi:,' . .. -,--~<"JI lIP ~ Dr Old ' . rJiABir~1iS'.'~' "-.:-~ . :;i" -- C ~ E lE:' - ~ · ~ ~ ";;il' -:--, . ~,.' ,: ,~,. .,." ".1 " ' ," ,1';i1\\\iIJm\ii~\~i~i\~\\\I\\\\,.!i\\\i\~IiI' , . "".,. "".,. , .-,' =rl'~l ,,', . -n', ip!!III" B::o.;.lJ 15 il~~t." '....~. i --_- " '-'.1' Front Elevation '/8" - ,'.0" . , .~. · n.I\II, 1lll111If.1J>." IP ......,....r-->.'..:.:.::1..'..........'.'..........~': l' " .... .. -'11'" .- )' ~~~~.:~.".~ : .... ,," ,'''.'' '. ~ """"'.-'T"'~~ \:.J :7 ;.::. --':' L--1.. .~ -'" ~ .... --)~:l..;." :;1, == . ::0;:~'-' '::':;:;~.~... ,,, ,aill1\\I\ 'S---... .......-----.r-1l1 II """'.1 ",. ., .--~- Right Side Eleva\lon 1/8'" 1'.0" T~m~Clrl" \'ilb;o;<: ('d"tSdwl1\<; l.q...,,,,,l .",,!ii!\l\fl\'\'m\\l\\\il\~:.... ,t')iil!\i~\~,tllhjlmH,"':" ,":;d.\l 11\\ij(J,; i;',~: "'l,.\,(,;fl:nl""I:"~ .. ill ,ill" .",~,.,;\,;, ;:[i!';i,i'd}.dn,nI1'1J~';< .,; IllfJ l:,W1:;i1\1 "" .' : Ii t~, \!' ' ,':' ,....--"1 - ..- ~~_ l ~ \ , ~ '~:f' ~ 0- .25-l"g - ..: 0 ~c'" "II'.@ 00 ~ ~ WOu ~ gj-5 c: ~.st:.'" ;:::-:: <:':: rl . ~> ~?> Z~o.r,<( _ ? ~ u ~ ~ ~ d ;::; -::. , '3 s~2~ ~ '... 0 c -<~~~ ,,"~,," I', :<<<<' '''''''''' ",:'", .,."""" A3.A.8 ': ",' ~'''I' ,. '1'''1''':'''''' . j G...."'....... 1 ~ - ""..".", ~""-,,,., Lefl Side Elevation 118" - 1'.0" ~,~ .. E"f~ll f:..J.rl1.. ,,' \ ,.. .i_ .I~.' .\ ...r ~, '. .,'. '~" ., . ~ '~ ~ mB Re"rEleva\ion Ill'." = 1'_0" _ I'll'" ;"",_.. ,'......._ .II, ~LLLLL _' " -- f!P" dL--..! ~' - .. ~-~,- !,,' --- _-. ~~.J. -\' _ ,,_.:-,. ~ . c:.:.lii--arL ~:' " ,__., ~ '._.'. lIP , ~.. ,,' . , . . (;,.,lii......, Front Elevation 1/8" ~ 1',0" ..,..0" ~.. '... }J'f.Q,~ "&~= (i",~Ic"" .r~ . l .. .. 11ll]!l, ,im . 0 ..=;ir:c ,..a' '" Left Side Elevation 1/8"" 1'.0" 'I"<:I11<:<:lll.1 \'ilb,,'(" I , ',,,..,,'" ,,"~c .'j "f Selle'lll<: I..'!,<:nd ,mi.".,... ....'.'.".. 1(",,, I "P ~ .'1"'1''''''''' 1I11~!il!flih .,~ ~." !ilL .". ,,(.1.[ . ""i:I'ITI!IIIrj1lljltlij!i!WI!hLi'~" ";,. '1qn,!!,ljlil!l III liil ,!__oI")lI;:,;;::; ". _, ',u, m"l · '':,I''iI''''I'>['' . , IjIIIIiIIIII , ." _~ :;,~/""",l'!Hii:',>, : I ~ ~ '. l ...1 ".., Right Side Elevation 1/8" = ]'-0" -1 . r~-. H m It'] ~ m , , n! Rear Eleva!lon 1/8"" 1'.0" i r-' R If" ,0.: .,2 ...i~ ;>, -: 0 =;::;0::: :::: := '" ~ 6....:::: E.g,2 ~ >'- ()~C C CJ 0 ~ ~O] ~ ~~V1-< ~i~~ ';:I-""u :::: '-' ~ ~ <(~~~ : ;',:,'" " ~ "~::: A3.BA WI -....- :I.,.,.. ..~. ..":::l .. ,.~~)c:.rI:I~,;i .~ Q."~:; .~' h'.'::::':: t..:..:. ~":\d H ::.-< 1 ~'EEEl" .. 'n.b.:~.' ~'".'::: .. . - ,.~-' j I' , , Front Elevation 1/8" < 1'.0" ... -. '~'!JI!I!f" ~pt--"r-o-"-C' :,'.'-,' ,....'..-.-.: ~.--- =. -- '. ~ '.,', _3~ . . .,0 .. .. .. "..~- Left Side Elevation 1/8" = 1'.0" T""I",:,,1.1 \'ill".c:,'C"t",Sdl<:I1Wf.c';:'-11l\ HUm!!H., .. .:.JIIl. ' ;....-:=.''-;.:=. =::f,D., ',,~'-IIi' .... ...,.' ~- , _. . .- . IUll!!lln 1IJI!!!III.~_!ilL .. ==81 ;:..., .., '.J ...:: t--.~.:--. ... ----=-::::11I .~ l ",,'iifn;lj;c. """""I'if!lJilmlliiHIIlHliL:.. , 'qit;IH!iIII!)!~'i'nH .";Jn~i,:W'i"I;'i. ... ~ ---1 . .fi"li ,.,. ,.,. I ... i " - ; i 100' , (~, ,I I 'l'il'il!1111 I ,"'IIIIILU!.11!l!II,II"t1t ._c:L'J]} ,... -.- ... - ~. I" 'J ! 1 1...1 ,.,. Right Side Elevation 1/8" = 1'.0" I" I'HI'l !"liIHiiliIlHiI!IIiHilWiiiUH'''f Ill, 1,11!lm1tmm11mlimrnmWliOOli.iiil\ .. rc::l""l "". "'lIP ---= 1.1 j .' ': ' : ~ ~' t ,; ; : :)~:lLWi ':': ,.. n .....L.; ...~. nI:' ""''''''~ .. .~ m fTI -, ~ rr 1:'~"" '. ;-",ll I,' ! .-.- 1"'-- ,--- "- 1 I j , , .' - i i ~ 9JIlI!!II .. II , , .- -- . !!Il ,....--. m ~iE' 1:1' ~ J " ~;J> M<I<" 1('"'''''I'''I'''i'"''''' Rear Elevation l/~" - 1'-0" -r "- ,~ ~g q;:iC::: ~ ~ ,r: ::: ;::: ::: S 2.a ::; u:":: o ;;. -= v80 !~Q] ~ ~>e::o- ..7:-:"'<:( ,::"3~U 5~~~ c~,",)j ~ ~~ _ <t> 0 = <1::~g~ I,'on..",,- '-"",,'"'1C''''' A3.B.8 , , .~ l"f", I - - . . . '.... --... .. ~ ,I . ~"'''' _ .;-~-:-'':., ":::rrn~'-- ~ , ~". IlU ~ ,;_." .,-,'.1---i>.~"" ~.""< "~'= .. . ,~. -Jrl ;---. ;:::: ""'.r::-~ " - ~,! .-; , ;:' , j;,:.. 'i~,~:~ ~~_:, :....~ (;,.~ ~fi frl~; '\ , ' rl; > 1 i . l 1< l' 1 > ~ , ,,~,"'iI"jl 1JdO<1[tii -.J .' 'lilt;! , I "'I' <' , 1 'l;i,l FronL Elevation 1/8", 1'.0" , 'i,.::;ililill!mll!llm~'I<<I!!I~ljl!llll!ll!imiiJiiH[ii:;'" ". lIP' l'-i' . ' . -'d 1$ _w'" ."'Ul!l!~~IRih<'- . ,; ~ IlIIHDl!llflH:::Jj, 1'" =J ..'.r::: ~ Ill" · ". L ~ ~:;"i "', -I' .. _ :'~,"i:"j. "'., Right Side Elevalio!1 1/8" = ]'-0" ; '" " ,,,It!ljl!lmlllllllllllllll~I~1 ~ ,I. J, 'Jilll! IllijjijmfK.llmli~llllijll~iillll.illl~lil!111 Ii!: in".... . ~ 'UEl' .---:-i "'P ""'" r-T'", ..,';. ..,. ". : ",I ,.I' , LL .JJ ~ ~ - f"rn.'." m..'.. '. . I'Fi !'T"1," '" '''"',~, .~~ c r l(liiil n~J r.::Ll L~'.L i Left Side Elevation 1/8'" 1'.0" T,.'m<:lulot \';\1;\1-'<: Col",- S~hc"K l.cg~nd ~ ,""- f} Rear Elevation 1/8" ~ 1'.0" 1,\,"""1"""1""'"'"''' ~ '-- '-.J"O o 0 -....: :J .~. 1] C::: :; == -~ ;:: c...i= E i g o >- UdG - 0 = IJ ~_ ;:! ~Ju ~ ;: == ~.....1 ;;>C:::o-> ;:-~ or.-< ~~~i 3r=:Bt: -~g~ <t'f-.......f- ,,'I,",,~ '<, ,,,,,, ''''''''~ " :"", A3.CA , """jii:ilHilliill!l!Illfllllt ." '," Ir:l"I'I"~'11 ~jiIWl!jllljtij@ijill~ !lllllmlil~ I!, .': it::!!, ~ rn . ,~~~~~ .'~~i IfI!IIII '~lllllllmllll!l!lI11li"", 1!!"!r'!..,,-,'~ LIJ t:iLJ ~ ,. I ' II . . . . . -. 1 1,- -------, .-a: .. _______ "'" .1".( = '~.~:'-~'.'(~.i..~ : ...:,-_. -"I r:::" ,j.., 1:-1 ", ' - ,.' I " , Fron! Elevation 1/8" == 1'-0" IInl!lJlllnllIll'" .. ,. ... .. .. G","'"'' Left Side Elevation 1/8" ~ 1'.0" Tc'nl",,,b \ Ilb!<,: C"lor Selle'me' I,'gent! GT'I I:.j~~;~ 0, ffi'l ITJ'.'.. : r.lf,J; . , rWIIlI~ '1IIIIWlllli!II!IIHHhii"'" . ,;'imiilHH!hliil " Nil,' · :.;KllIl1jl1illiIH<,.:, l .,.,. IflII!IIi . Jr - Cl It.<:~~i . -K~'!i, I:,,,,, T"I' hj."!'"'''''' ,,, " < Right Side Elevation 1/8" - 1'.0" ., ~ ":' I , , , . "'''M"""l ~ J rn i lIi{ m OJ , i hIJ ITfJ ' ,. ""Ill -j- Rear ElevCltion 1/8". 1'.0" If" ~ ;':.J-o ,C <':: - ...: 0 ;>'t::~ ~ ~"2 ~f~ uoG ~.!O] ~ @>O:::C' c.. <;: or. <c -<:::~u ~~~~ ~f-3~ - 5:! C 8 4::1=;;1- " ~',".~:~' I ~' .;,:',::' A3.C.8 If" Exercise Room ',~l ,.,.r, ,,,.j'iilmllmuHllImljll~lillm!IIUHi!!!;; , , ,- ". ,,' " H '''''."..,.I'L'''''''' ; "" .6 --i -g -"":0 >>::::0,:: '::: CJ ~ ,.... <-: If~ woe 5 ~-5;; s ~ ~;q i;>c::::~ ..z:-::<r)-< ...?:::::v =g~.g ::> - , .... ~~8~ - <'..> ~ ..... 4:~~~ Exercise Room 1/4" ::: 1'-11" ']'C'111c'cub \'ilLl.~C' (-"h,r:..dl<:n1<: I''',~c'nd from EIc\":ttlnn 1/4" - 1'-0 9 ",jplll~IIIt1_.~'UItIH'i"i" ~~l.' ~, l ; ; : ! 1 ~ it; .- ill' Ij 1 i I' i, " 'Y;:"I,,'hJHll ,I. ,d\ J'T """iii!ldl!!iiiiilHI1iIIllllllliihll,i!:',, 3 I,'"'','''''.,''''' ,,,,,',," I ~.. :',,'" Right Side and Rear EIc\'atiol1 1/4" = 1'.0 Left Elc\'atinn 1/4" = 1'.0 A3Fl _ d.HJtttJlID:DnJb.~~ 5 T;I~ 5]{le Elevation Typical 1 Car Deep Garage 1"::: 8' 5 rik ",Illllll:lJllllllllllllDllIllllllfllllfflimmlflllfilnIUlllnnIllllllllilif1",. Front Elevation f1, Car G:nagc \,'itb Double \\"Ilk Space::> 1" ~ 8' 1'.lil\,,,I(;:.,..,:, D,~" . .-rtflllllllllfCllllllllllllfflUlJIlllIII1h1B\lllll1filll1lIlfllilDl:1lltllllfn, ,,,. (:~n>c'nt I'I;"T~' Rear EIe....ation Typical 8 Car Garage 1" ;:: H' ".mHlmmmmIHlll1!!!ilill!Hl!liiilllH!!ll!!:lIi,Wi!:!I!i!:!liii,:i;. [:rom Elevation Typic:\J 8 Car Gara!-,:c I" - 8' 1',,;nt,'d(;.Lr,L,:" D"o' " Typical 1'\\0 Car Deep (;aragc Section 1" - g' 1\-piC;'i1 One Car Deep C;:lLl.lZl' ~L'C(hTll )"::f-l' ;; i l ; ; ~ i J 1111' I . , ~:~lil~H!l;H[:iL)I:ii: i" Typical T\\'tJ ell Deep G:\ragc Elevation 1" :: g' ... .JUI""'''''''; "'11""" II""'," .: &l1,',., ", ______I~,i; TrplC1.l T\\"o Car Deep G:\l;lgC Eb'ation I":: H' If" "- .5 .J -g -"':0 >,:::ci E i:: .::;: ::l ;::: :::: ~ -[ s ;:; >.= 080 IU~ -<wV1-<t: '3~u E~g.i -' :::: , ::l ~~~~ -.-288 <(f-,....,f- \;~''." I\\:;~<<' A3.E.2B i ~ l 11- ,'"11llIBIlIIll ,..-- Front Elevation 3116" ~ 1',0" 1*, ',;~ li~~ "'" m '1I!1llrlllliltl" l ~"l\ml.ll1lil!"" Ii:: III ~ rI; III l J Left Elevation 3116" '" ['-0" 'k,",.,'"I.,\'11 , ",~,'(:"I,,,SdKrn,'1 ''lend "''''mmmmmU1lIID!! l-l ' oiilW1H1lllilii!" ik,.""",'",,,,,,"' ,j . d1!l111111l111 1<."..,......,,,..,,.., It" ~ ..,,":;;:!iHHni!lHlHik! ' -:'mii:::l:i!lI::!.'-;;::.--,".,,~.'.,H"'d' ' 'l!lIllli' "'~r. , ," '~i;'!;. l\!:\~ IT lH\fH' '--") 1 ,~ 2...j~ ~ i :3 ._ '-' c::: I !:j c ,;>":: Gal] ;:: u 0 g ;?J1"5;; ~~~8 ~21~< .~ 9 c c: ;:)E""'~ ~ (.; , ::J ~ ~ '3 ~ <r:~gs Mf- "-iT ~ Rj~ht Elevation 3,16" ~ 1',0" f] r r-- ....- -.....- --- -i~ ,', I' i.i I ;~,;,',:::,r , ~ < ;,~:;" SOlllh Elevation 3116" ~ ['.0" A3,DA ,- : ,- ,i TJ! iJi: ::::::H.}_ ~m A1 " rL. Uum' .' : : : i iuumu?'] : r~: :"mui! : U ~L::::::::,:::'~ !Q1:::::::'u ,@\ u" 19j: uu @ '. 91'~6' ~:::::::-:.J~1::':' . uu:::,,'@,::. ~ : : [", ' i V ~~ - , ' , , .~- II .mmnm.~:':u m""Tu . , !tt~~ ~o~\ , l~ r R'." ' . 7 \ 1 ,""':'~"':r) : ImlI. I-I Or'I&IIIl!II!I 1"J'f' : : _/ T 1,___,' l<~----_______"_':.: i: '----- 'J :r.J ",Jt:":,tC~:: --":::c~ ::l,~J .__mn,,! ! i ",:~ ._, - - [~ CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLAN 3750 sq.ft. SCALE';/4JJ.l'-O" VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ,f'. . ~~ --:) ,,01, 01 'J - .i,-.C ~>~ ': ;-0[ } .n-' . " o[ ;'.J L' ct, ~\I ii, .. I i i l.'.r- , ..u1, -"'" " .nJ'! , ~ - w: .-' ~ ~ I ~ Ii ~ . :l ~ " ~ 'L DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. g IOO'l.UPId.MAAYl!.n,a .w....'..c:.o...:nOT Tn_"..,......:lO A-1 ;, ~ ~, "- /""- -~/-/ -~-~ L. .='- . \1 ~; II I iUI__-i ~ '" N CLUBHOUSE FRONT ElEV A. TIOM ,; ~~ v~~~c ~~'~~~IEilltil,~ DOll! \ 1 REAR ELEVATION v/ L'...- . ~ .-.-. ~LZ ~ , I --i~-~" {I,r~ f ,1 1 ~ I FT , -'==1 ~ ~ ~T ~ --, ~ ~.~ /' - -~ ._,- ~.'-. ~- j - ISIm Eml r I - II ___Ll__:=J _ - '1\. - - ,// .~- . ~ -.=-.. ~---=-=-~ ~ :, , -- --~.-- ~,',~ JJ I U~' - '" " ~L ~~-- LEFT SIPE elEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEV A TIO" VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DENNIS J. FL YHN ARCHITECTS, INC. ~ ...., (. ~::.=. ~~ :'~'o~ Of A - 2 'ftUP'\OWl,'''''''tfQ-Tlt<I . ,j =71 'I Icl'c~ /, fo? ~ ~'\;-fi!ill~I!~~or);~I\ I:s: ~ r;:='(A ~.' ~~~" / I BI~,7 'c ~ W-jIT,i .cJ , ___. __ II II'C A,,-,iCJI,' " I I I ' C \.. I fI I ~ -'-- r B-1R ~L_-_~,~ ~C { A-1R ,~A~3R Lf ~-JJ i ~ ~c~J- I~ I c.:clJO[ B-2R ",-C..ccn I,~ ,i-, L~. --.;c:cJH--'~ I~\ ~'~.\ L =~ . -:- c-'""""""T [p/ 11'-- \JQ I ILJ, ._._, U Wi" t--",Jnn0<- -- " .l, ~~ ~ \ II '--- II Ir'l ; llr1'L' - 110 ~ In 1 ;=J " I " ,,, I, ,:;: - _ I J;::l 10 t--- 'J, c:. I 0l.'s c.L_-."_ =r.f"= -Jr= LL_-_-'J n II , ._["'~ ' i >) / -t ~I'I _ c r~ ~ ~IJ"! -,,:d} r:J: ~C !~;ih :C' :" \ Ii \1 .112 ,IJ\11L---,i1Ulrl ..::::: c'. 0:::10---;1:::'==, Ell' r-i",~" '1\: I 1 : ) r- I\" :! I " < ~~l I -, tl..Jt ~ ~ .. l2i " ^nn] ,/ . - , L:- -, c:::.J " <: I I n' -- ~ " B-1 l}t':i A-1 . \ A-3 L' 'J--~ B-2 :r-.I, b, 11 I ~ I r,- - -f--' t - I \ 1lJ,: l' (I II, " I I~ IL ...III I ,.-__-, .. '\. L_-_. _-J I , , ~J,"--!!l~, J I Ell U ~... ~I ~~>u-,ff~~" ~ )iii1iiiilrt=-- "iAC':>~- .,,,,"-6" . :1 / .( 7 " L ~ .. .. ';~ ,--'-- ~ BUILDING TYPE 'I' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE,'/8"o"-O' VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DENNIS J. FL YNM ~~o?~!T~:"~~!"'~~T~; (-:;j __C....U.o1 OF A-3 "TII._."....,...nt<> ~ Ii (~=~ ~ II II I i .L_-.J I B-1R~--~ ,__c \i;c'J-~, ;i J)~F'J I ~;, ':;:J oLo =t~. .. I.:. , I~ ~i 0 .:1ll" C,' I ,~-- ,_I\l..JI~ 11. m' 1261 -.^ B-1 . ~:.~~ ',i ~~ ~ ~'r----.~ P TY1 -~' ~~ lI----L- 134'-8- llill i II! i :'!I'- --~ ---1 1=' , 'Ii y~~i'f!1 I=~. !. ""I == - I~ : I == ~ I':--~ 'j - i I I' 'I (-3R L. '.~~:C~~1 B-2R r-', J' -- -------., '.. ' C 1;>1 " " <~~.\ !~) ~::r-~=-=-:' .~' I I I,m-.- . - J"" f--l - - --. <, I U . '., n \. ,I v '~ cr- ,1r~~:nn'7:~- r,'_-:" .L- ~ '- -' I l'j: I ! : f: I : I 1 I GI "~ l - L_..... '_ L J ~UJ1 _ (;(, l(il"IJL~..~ i:'-~f.':: ~l}~L, J,l""""l 'Fr. G ! I U '0 r'~-_-,~ ~t=jt~ ~:-=jl::tlit: r~_-,: \...' I 1,1 7J . r I Cl" " <,' ""[' <:1:_ '1' LJ I J- --1 I -l--- : , I L " ~ (1 I r, ~.; L.~.~r, Iml"&-..UJ'7~~i"""j-''-1 II, (" IIL..;:::.::..n--+11(---l1 --, .--- <: I. r"-j---j;';;r" ,I'j : '.J, --.' ",'- "- _( ~' I ~ . i A-3 L '-'I~j ~ I B-2 ~ ~ A-1R .A.."I---. ~' I' ,~) . - r-- 1 ! I r 'I I II II I "'h'~~-..~i=-=In~, " 'I ~- ~- ,I, r (1i. "I ,.j I , ---'I ',,' ',' - -i! ~ IIIIII!III 'Il:- "'-{ r BUILDING TYPE '1' SECOND FLOOR PLAN VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA t ~i ~ J it l- it 'l> '" = ] ~ ~ SCALE.1fE"."-O" DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. FI IOO~~:~I~~ A-4 --------------- = D rL-..:--------~ _ D !I €"-~~------- .---J ri'm'il ' -, . '11=?l . .- rITi-~ ' , ~ I mB11=I+I=I I B . I r=TR 1~1 ~ -nnm~ _~ I =- ~ ~.'.~-i1~-J III m~~I. II =_ m ~ flll /~1~ ------------- , -----~~.n _---- -t_1 ------/-- .:.:>----- .. 1;:' . ~"; . , , ~ " M 1... BUILDING TYPE I ~ FRONT ELEVATION ..--------------- '=' ///.--------------~_ -.----------. _______ R /---- ,,/ ------- --- I I _/ /--------------- -~- -------------1 I ~ ~,' .. /-------:... _ . . . . . . . . . . ~~ . . .~I':-::-::o~ '~ .~..._ _ ___.IJ ._..J ~I'-ml I1Dfl-~' BUILDING TYPE I . SIDE ELEVATION - -- ~--------- 0/'--0 ~tu__mw~ -nffi lllfrTl ~ - - - - ~~------ IB = ~, Ii L_ _I BUILDING TYPE I - SIDE ELEVATION VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. [;J ....la-l~::=,~~'.~t; Of'" A-5 ~'7W'''O.712O " A, ~c ,/l' 7 :~ ------.J I ,'~ /c =- ~ ,-1^" ~}~ r;--711 - () I :'i'::: B-3 co. (7 .' L~--\j : :-1/ . I __J / I -~---- ~~ ..... ~. n-- D lIJ1_ D Ie J:1 ~7 'I .- 00 '~ I ~ '~,,1i i jS'~ 'iTTTTn . -.l I I ----, I I '====c I I r-- "~]ct- r i ~ '- 1:Q~L J_~'~ ~(~ ~ ,~) :F';:: B-3R -! ": 8..::, ' iC-_-_~.J : _Q_fIT - I' \ ~. '.... I - I / :::::t. ~- - .' ,J~{- ( A// ---- ,~ , . \ A, ' '---' ,'C ^" ~ \ C 129'-4' - ~ ' ~ '8 rr=:r- ---~ ~ ::=s A-2R ,'\A-2 II -----==1 -=-:-] II ~~=_=; ~~m ',m,,~ ~=_=~;-ll , I' 'I I . I I r 'I 1'""f 'l:_ i I 'I I . I I! I, J J > '~f- ,/L_..J,I trnr-- '---, ,;--.J I ~~, , I.C.-__~ '" ""11= "- _-'" " > ".,1 '.'" ,; 0, ~"il;, ",,"1' "" 8~_L,' rr---i-: I o,o,,~':- -,-~~, ~ ~ ' 1,----71 J=J> r r ! I I I - I ~, i i: 1 > 'L ,I I . I',.J' ~: =='=-~. -,::..~m DO+1'L'~- cJ. V II "_.1 _- ,I \ 1 L,' : A-2 A-2R I~kr --(6 r , C._ ,'Jc ~ BUILDING TYPE 'lIa' FIRST FLOOR PLAN VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA " 'I ,,' !1 ~ r'1.S:;U-~' 1,)[""11[, 8"" B-~R , ''-,,.J--- I -F v, -J I , ),~. VJRir[:l](rhj~ 'r=:" ',\ ~', " , bI -,'1 ;~ '.. I ' r"'or. , I~ F.i "~ , '~'i , r;:: I CI 1 .~ :1~ q LlJ" 'r,.-J. IDt "y ~ i/ ~ "...,)~ .-. /1,[ 110 -=, B-4 Y I ".-+d ' .~. '-'jpT . I TL >- l:: : L 'J ~ ' '::L.-, r ,1 I y ~ ~ ;;; IT 111'11 . .+'-1 II, I II " ri . I(~ SCA'_E 1/8".1'-0" DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. [;J .l>01E.L~'::~~~~I~.~ OF... A-6 TIlD_, 11141 nC-7ltO L. 1 /JI'7 --::-Lr;-' II C , l... i Gril ~~!] :'f-.--.ii: B-3 0 p, .r" I I I I I I :.:;-- U !!!!!: L~,~~~~ ~--.i'l fBt':i/l- ,} :."" _' ,., u r:J- , I: .- 00 .'~., 'I \j1 ~: ---.....w 1'::1 ~ 1- L I" I - , I - - if-f'..1L:t-. \,,! 2l [': '. '.' J~~~J rbr c Er' , I r,-----i": B 13 R '-1" , 11 III .,. --~ ~t, - 1.1 I. , I.-L--\I I I 0 1.,,' . 1<:....__"":'1 : - _J 1~ll : SYt::~-J --1'--'11 C 'J' " -..J 130'-2' ~; A-2 g A-2R /1 f:= 1\ .----,----- r-- -- ---------." I !:::::I I"'" " "'""'"" 'I ' <: I --.-- I~.... . . -;-:-\ ----.I'-:H; J. 1"_-_.71 I'~crnn '_ me-',,,, ,,-_-:'1 'r I' 'I I , I II 'I "' < I I I I ' I I I I, ~ L ~ --11 . I J- ,I J J > ~ '., ~-=.:J. dA:~ L_=~ .,~; ~ ~=L, l"i-,"71 I --- j-uo r,_-{l J",~ < : r 11 I I I ; I !! I ~ 1: > (~1_~L ~?J--~~~IUU ;l}_~17<,~--l~__-.l~_.t'\ ...... 'r-"' Ii' . " 1,_:) , J ",,1 -.------ A-2R --, ~ A-2 to ~ , .l75 L, ,-, u BUILDING TYPE 'lIa' SECOND FLOOR PLAN VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA , ,I r~ ~I.'~~ ~ "'i Iln c B-.l:IR I J,,--- ' I 'I~ c " ' I p__L___ ,~~. L ::11~ i~~ I"".!' ~"I ' --,' le'l -~- ,-J t,ti . . !nll il . ~J @i.!,l. t'~tJ~,.,I~~. "'. '~J c:::- lji'1i.1ik-U' I I i .1, I~~. I ' ,1 - - - , " ~II L~' ~-r---"'--- - lJ /'" I I :- ,r~ __~ : , B~4 I I I I , 'I \.' ,',' i}l"')~ I r'::-~) -;'-- .... ',I i~ , ---I 1'1'1 0' t 'f '" .. liJ r- C.;., '1-' 5CA'_E'118"~1'-O" DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. ~ ....,l.l~= ~~.~~o; [)fA A. 7 TU~(7")'7o-'UO , .- ~----- ~ ~---------- ~ II -~. ~ I 1-=1 LJ ILJ ~iM~li~~~= ~J_. ,~'. ~l1P(lTCli m~\]jrTr- II ~ ~~J ~ ------ -'-= ~ ~ fr<///-~--=:w:'n~':'~'"' .m"~ ~ ~.!.~lil~MIDD~rr =n m~ III _ . , 'I ' r II ! R=FR, ~., "~'." hE.'. ".." "~ LJL" '. I I r- . ' . 'J :...--......-- - ~-- ~. .- I '!' " ~ / .------- ----- A ____--- -------- - ~,I I -~ - --- ---~->- -- --------,--- i ~---/ ------- - ---,-- _____ ____// -- -~ 1----. I I~\_ . i M I mm. ell lI: ~\;]j, '~..-~m~: II I m 'I J-L' , 'Im1im r'II-:rn-F-ft~ ~EEI '1 II; \ ; .J '. I '-." ,. \ ~--HJ . --------- BUILDING TYPE lie . SIDE ELEVATION /,-- -.~---- ~.// I I ~ --"'" ,= ~ LJI1LJ ~ 1-1imiilM~F-1~1 0_ \, !~~.MjT i}J~~. .~..,/ 1\fJij im -In .~~ I 1'"'1' 1I,__..JllL. " . ~.. I c.~ :1 a~j]!Il'~ ~ t[inl~4ml -r~ 'GE OF TEMECULA OR LEASE ,A, CALIFORNIA ~ / DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. b;) ,~,"'~~'MIIA"'lLn.. A-a ....A_C...U.~7 OF tnEP_,<71o<,e7O-":tO I ____J .t I~, I^, ~ I I (:-F+"A:j ',1_. r=.. " "I' . I : : :}-~J,: ~ IA,~ C1 rr=: A.C ~_I_- I II ~ B_l~}C A-1R .~ A-4R~flt"~ B-2R i 'j"'JiY-:~ , ~\~ __.n ~ :J ;,', 'I :-l\1~ ---, II ~Ti i '~\~' I ',III ' ,-_-.,r,IDOc,.t:~.m'~-l r Jr1C'- f 'T L-.:Iu c, ,.,1 , II' ,1'-1 I'" . I ",,\ I <"-"l I -!l r' I I ~ - J I I ~ rn I ~ _ _ j i Q I ( L I ,,- I I', . ,J'::O, "',.t.-.:c,..."'Mc.c.:f .::)__I,.a...~..,=-__:J...i.~'-.~:4: r. -fe,':, L,'.~~."__, C~;;I-:--~ ~(-~--:--Il~ ~> ~ -+1:;': '1"'1 --r---' r I 0 ',\ ,--" ~h9rt ~~I-r;~r r---o r-f CC ri l) ; \.1 ..' ,~,,/ (~l '....' -' r -, ,'U .'--' 1 l' I I I ~ In L I I I II I' I I, I' r ~ ' I i r--- l,- - I L -J I ,~ I I l _ _ J I . I I - ~I I \ IL 1"11"YI-'l'::__=~'IWC~'~_~~=="...... il I f -. !)(~ ,l ".' , L " , -1'1 ;' , -,', '--0ili.:I '[I ~' B-1 -~,t'ld;'-- .', A-1 L___~: cC~_4~1', c~~';1 Cf', I ~ ..., I, 1911 1 '..-,. - " '" B-2 I:, I II. -I \. I! I;; Ii ''-.--..-J',-, - ~',~: . "u'~ I '~l-' -J-- LL_.-,~, If" I .. ~I'~ ,~? I~in ',. ,I ~ L"" ,I -,_1 ,-J.tt"ff!! III AJ ~Ui --,.~ AI ITI'II'II'I' !- . .-1" ~" J" I.. "I. ,'- , . IA lA, I ~ 137'-11" n ~ , . BUILDING TYPE 'III' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SC"LE 1/8"~:'-O" VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. [;;l .1t<I1Ll~':::.~~:I~O~ Of A-9 ~,(1..,.lo-7110 137'-11- --, llillllill ctc---1- o h r1-:'''' d :-',~ - 01 ',' -$ r1 r ~-~' [Qf,--;, '~~ -=,Ju-L Ci B-1Rr~ A-1R - i A-~R~{ tJ l' :~. .- -- -. =1 , ' .-'Yrml B-2R ~/l ~~i rl ';-' 1 I,YI ',r- --Lif-~ L ~ 'c::cT----~" ' ':';~~~J; IT]' LJ(j' '.:" "1Fi:i'Lil' rl:':c::,~rt:niiSJ::. '100-'7'1 ~r:.:.~l ,jf ~ --I'" " ~ I - I '] U' I c',' I I : t ' ' I I I I r' I __ I ~ 0 _.01 ':.c 1 e, p ll--c.J.J ~lt:' .. :.~~. I ~l-_ -'oJ Qt Cc t) i<<~_l p. L- , 1" I e~ If" ",. '0,:: . . ,00, .. , I .".., , 1.1.. " -tl j':Jl o' -. 01 rei:: ; I .:w ~, ;c-'-,i ill: }~:;::. '~' ,;r.-..-,; ~~ f: cL'~ 7\ ~- ~ I - I -- I - I '" II II " . ,I II L 1 . -' I '- ~. r-' ,- .;1 lJ L_..J ~_i jIL~_j ~ I -u., r\i'" I L,::, ,1" ':.J::",I, ,..L '"11, ~i "LLI'~1..L _:j, '1 ' ''U'",IIc. '=' I '-k\,1 ,~. ./ I .~ 1', :::1 .n:' .~j'~;'~~;-; ~ ~_ f+t L -=': ~:U 1 ' B-1 ,~ : I .A-j -'1 A-4' ~J ~~ B-2 ~-.E ---1 ,_' ~.-.-~: : l ~. I L'-_-_-.J-" I ~L] !D.c::' . i ~"f '.. J;. 'I.' " Lj-J l ~I '- -r.# jH'~ IT! ii' II! I flW~' --=--r-; -S( ----' _-L- BUILDING TYPE '111' SECOND FLOOR PLAN VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA II ~'} j " ~ I .- is l[ ~ ' ~ ~ .. m 1 - SC"'LEli6".I'-:;;' DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. r;:;] uo,...u.~."'..YI<.OT.1 A-10 rnm:~7~,C~7:'~ OF". ~- BUILDING TYPE III FRONT AND REAR ELEVATION BUILDING TYPE III SIDE ELEVATION VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA / ---::,"~--,~ ~-1 g, ~ , -- ,. ~-= "--1 L..J Ul ~ ------ . -=--1. \=i' ~_ I! ---".---.. ; ....___. "---l.J ~_/ --- ------~?::::--- II~i' ' 1m ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~ , , EJ, , I' . I " I L "~ .OAL.."""<"'O" u/ ~--"..r===I ! r-~---- l~~ "- ____ ~ - - -=~I :::.-= - - -_= -::. c-_...:.- _~~~_ --:.:-=:;;::.::"",-~-=,.::~,c;_-=--=--=;.~_;_ 'd!i=i ni' '~~" ;001.'. I:n ' I I I! , ",- I Jl!!IIIWJ)L. . _ __ ._ ' I' ~ _ ~_~~ , b~ rnl ~, I I' liiliil 'illrm ~ ~- tBl, BUILDING TYPE III SIDE ELEVATION 'CA'_O''''''''0' DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. fI e~~..~!l~:~ ~ A-11 ...J .J GrJ: '~ ~i~1 ~} 1 ~~, ;~ c~ I ,.;.. _-_..>J ~ I ,--" ; :- -, I irr """.' A 1R L--/' I ~_~ I I B-1R II; ~ - A-3R L.,..J , I' " : r' ,'I'.-FDd1 B-2Ri'11 I , If- :'-!t=. I' I' t,=i-'~ 1-' I llU' III '--J'J'- ,---' 'C[' \, ''''';____'.Jc-i I::"" ----- ~i-l i ~~I!;~ ') ~ ,'1"" \""""""T ) I\",\ ,I IL~, .~.. -, 1....lID2.t:. m,.. ,. -1 r . -, I-- - I ' \ ~ I I I I \ : -- ; i \'- l \ r-1 r..r ' i" ~- h - ! I 'I i. I I' 'I L~' '-,- 1 ~ e+--o c; 1-- D c!- '-\,J"" --.,~ c,._J" 11=, L -- =i ~I;i~ f= c {]'~III":Jnl.J;j' n~;~.~,~' ~lt~ ;~ '~,~~c;i r '1 IS' " I I~ L I - I ' ' , I - I' I I \ c;: : '~ +r-- , 1)11\ 'IL ,,-,~ I~, ,.,:'--==r:tooF:f. :IW,/,.~~~=_J~ S' r =-'", ;, "'~"'!I' f L :: .l.., r- --r~ 1--:;, ,.J =-=r-tHI i -- -i~~ '- Lee'___, c::- ",: ' I -- ~ B-1 j.: ; A-1 A-3 L -- --~I~,j, y 1"'1' :,~ 'rt; :~ r ;;--..;f: B-2 I 'e:t-..JI; \ \ ' \ I I, I Y 1":1 ~("~:" Xl 1^c1LL..J= , "'\,', LL_-.~"____( ! I' ' ~L=~ ~ p;?J 1-. _ Ii :-. '- -', \~,,' ~- ': I II ' J /e L..J ~ ,";, ~' t,s.L,'..d 0\ '> :'::.J ~ ~ ' 1F----I '- ---;/cl "'1"'1"111'\ of ' j-1r-- ,!,i,III,1 1,,-- ......,j- , !~/'IAI, L~ ' '"""T~--" _ 'J ""'- I --- , I ~ , ly'l / -\ ',>- '" 11:j I b_, I , I I .. is .'11;4'-6" ~I t I-'ei c,"-__ l~ ~~ ~/Cl 'lilll\III': -i.. -. 'g." 1./ :;: I'.;' ~ ~ r ~ j, ; .' I' ,J " ~ ... m BUILDING TYPE 'IV' FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE ;/8"_1'_0" VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. ~ ...,IL..,M,IlA.ULU.. ......=~;~.;:;:.~ OF~ A-12 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 134'-6. ITIIIiIIII =tti--~1 , I <:' '- . :_l, I I' I ,I, I, " I -';-___ I ~'r I~: A-1R C<A 3R L, :CJi', k~' --, B-1R ,n -. Lu." , l' , ___un__ r .-,i-Glrnl B-2R TJ- ~ u.' <fQ" [_ I. i -.. ' \j-- ,~ ~". - 'u u,.J,Y U] _n'; ]H I C::=+~*K'>' '""'iTfJI/'I' '~1J'IL'I' 'K..^'h,'m,)it-CrnC-"--l,n, LI II'. ,) III lj....... , rl ,---,' L. In _ -i . ,-1' - -' ~ - ] L:<.:J II i! . I II II L/ rI /' . " .. -11 ~ . 0 ~,-. 0 .~" 1.\'J,p:.~~',~~., ffi~~' ,.,' ~"J:~~ ~ ~., ell" <o[ h.~ ,. ., J. ". - '-, ~ ,~.r i I 0 7" r. --" ~' :.- u0 I---~ 0 ( I ~5 I J'- I~ \ (I ~: - ,--' I'r-,'I l_J :"_J ',_," _' , .::1].\~.i c::: - '-ll[]lr'dl~J[}.=~~;9',~~:W~\ ~~:,{r1!f' I-'~." I~~ -l . 'I " ~ 'I ,'I ,:_J I [I' ,.--t::fl.8-~~,~L '~I ',---,/'~ j , .. " ,j I "'" I ?'.., "~', ~~~_ -l t - I <I, I I - --~ B-1 ~}'1 ,~ -A~1--.. g -'\-:'-3-- L?~~ I, ~ Iqo " I' ..,: i B-2 ~ ill!" = ~L-" =-1lr] [$11 ;II __ ' '--'\'-., LL_'~I': r = F it 0, iL' l r'I'" Ji"""lll -, <J,;.J"j oW == .---J 1> --. , 't? h (~f-=rl~ : ~---~ ~'- ~ ----, - ) 137] '1"'1'1'1' '1:,1' , I ~_!-.r BUILDING TYPE 'IV' SECOND FLOOR PLAN VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA .. "I =-;', it liri :l I, 'l> " ~ h ~ .'" SCALE :18".-,'-0" DENNIS J. FI.. YNN ARCHITECTS, INC. ~ '''''L~=~~~.,~lD~ OF A-13 rnl!~_'7~"7,,""'''' ~ .. ----------~~ f1 />-J I /~ '--'-------- - ~ ~-- -~-::-_~- BUilDING TYPE I V- FRONT ELEVATION /~ [' /~~ --------------- ~-~-~,-- ~ ------/ ..__- -----_____.. ----_______ I! -".------- .' ,//- -'-----. ',_ ~~----j 1_ ~--- ~------ ----... LJ- - ---..- ~--' ~ . , '.~ ' ~ '" ;do .1 rm m W ,~~ 1 - .... ....u.._._...... ... J ~. -... , , . -- T1. . . .. all ~ III I ~'- BUIL.DING TYPE I V- SIDE ELEVATION -------------. "-------------. ~ 'I 1 I I '---- ---------. - ![----~ '---.J -------~ 1] r ~II' i C:::-l--1i -rj . >---- ,_ I H . I I :1L--LL-- BUILDING TYPE I Y- SIDE ELEVATION VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA m ===0 . ~ " ~ DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. b;] .OO1l-1.A~U"'~""'n.. i A 14 ~~,":;:'~~:'; IDfA.8 . .~ 1 Jm~ ~ ~ f!1 fl' _.../ ;:t'J .n.. r:::WunU I ~, /lLl (1 ~ IR __n._.~.- ~ i----..- D. ~=~ uJ >- -(I l~~~j PLAN B-1 HA81T ABLE ARE.... BUILDJNQ F\.OOR AREA. 954 SO.FT. 988 8Q.FT. ~ ..\., :m;:.~._ "I ' '~ l'E'l] i! - ~~Q '&,~:: ~lc BKn.... ~---j "AN .::-' t. '. HABITABLE AREA. BUILDING FLOOR AREA. 1056 SQ.FT. 1084 SO.FT. I, '5 tV1M\t~ ; j:'~ ~ "~:t'1'l~ .- u~r "nn__, r' :;------( , '- :;- ': ,'--- ~' .':n' '- "1 ' r~''''TM'''' _...... ~LI\:~':I',l'.Ir. PLAN B-2 HABITABLE AREA. BUILDING FLOOR AREA. ,IE 1072 SO.fT. 1103 SO.FT. t '_ .. ~ ,] <-r--- .""",, " " -";""f> -.J .J L = '" I 'I.J" l.::.i!1L~g,g -- = ..' l ;;Ei_1 _. J1T_1 :)1 \ <, ~,,;;;''''~ -- I,l;>>..., :k. /,', ::, " ,,,,,!Tn' ,I lWJIlIJ.l: -II J -""'--: !;t'''. ':, \-t1 ' (1 ~ L ',' : ,- ..H~.G"" PLAN B-4 HA8rT ABLE AREA, VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA L-"\' 1151 SO,FT. ~n~- .... m.... ,'n -,~'" .:~~. " , /~ I: ..0<.""...."". .."'."...,,,'""'".....0.. '''''''O,..,..~'".''',,'^,_<'''''",..". AI. TERNA TE ENTERTAI~ENT CENTER ,. 'L ~ ~Qlt II \~ r1. ~' '1\ -l' .' II ~ I I ~ t !: ~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ !~ ~ I: L..... l ..,.... "II '~ ~ I' Ir, L.' --J ;;'." '=-L::im. B"ti liiii tttt:=I) rr-..L I~ BUILDING TYPE II - TYPICAL 4-CAR GARAGE I,!,NDER B-4 UNIT l' ~ /,. -------------- / - y~ Ii: // ~~, n ,::":n, ~___ ~--'C TYPICAL 4-CAR GARAGE PLAN DENNIS J. FlYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. [;J- .to1l.L~:=~~..~~.o; 'DfA A-15 1~.(7W.'o-71to ~mJ.::tg-H-i Km:HD : ~:: t ,. ~- !dl~ ~ "U -;"~E t ~. "j' ~'9"n.n' , ____u__~ ~-~ \ !'r--u-(! ---, '~rEjlL -;,' r Wi,.., n . . ....u. ,~ ~ L - LEJ:, I)pnn---.'" IU ,:m, i: L,.,.,.,.Innnn___."l ~..--.--::-~~~.-----r '.",",,'"'''''""''''''''' '..,,'"'"".. ~,~ ,.......,"...' <'"'.., ALTERNATE ENTERTAINMENT CENTER ::::..:Tn , ;=::t (:-> - ,,..... '1 i =t::l>...n '" '$ 'F__lIlJU ..:....Ii.l.I.I_~L I --r"",n.'----n ".~ ,....... PLAN A-1 HAalTABLE AREA. BUilDING FLOOR AREA. 7<l<l SO.FT. 731 SO,FT. PLAN A-2 HABIT ABLE AREA. BUilDING FLOOR AREA, 7~6 SO.FT. 775 SO.FT. r :1 U1:R..:1 i';'~'?, 0 L_~ KIT"""" ," " I' ::-:' ,"" -. U~= UUi'-+n' ,,'._._._.-C., $f' A .------0..""--0.::.0..----.-1.."""" i cuan ,- \\__/' \ J . f t f-iggf.j..,---.---- ")' a''l=llil;''='' I u-u::lJ ea.o....-r O:~:-"~lU~ _} .~. u,.. l,r _... ~ _n._ uu__._ ,~__- ~~ , , , , , '~ ' , ' , , ~':)~r ~~:. . ~.---. r- iU '':':'... I 'L 'ml...".".,... ~~. ----I I PLAN A-3 HABITABLE AREA. BUilDING FLOOR AflEA. 700 SO.FT. 727 SO.FT. PLAN A-4 HABIT ABLE AflEA, BUilDING FLOOR AREA, 861 SO.FT. 886 SO.FT. VILLAGE OF TEMECULA HOMES FOR LEASE TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DENNIS J. FLYNN ARCHITECTS, INC. Fl .~::.":!~4~:::'~~~ ~ A-16 ATTACHMENT NO.4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ G:\Planning\2006\PA06.Q018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\PC STAFF REPORT.doc 10 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0018 A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO A DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDING FINAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS FOR THE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS AND RETAIL/OFFICE BUILDINGS; REPLACING TWO SPECULATIVE BUILDING PADS WITH A DRUG STORE TOTALING 17,500 SQUARE FEET (RITE-AID); MODIFICATION OF THE RECREATION CENTER, AND MODIFICATION OF THE ROOF PLANS); AND PA06-0019 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DRIVE-THROUGH PHARMACY Section 1. Larry Markham, representing MDMG, Inc, filed Planning Application No, PA06-0018 and PA06-0019, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. Planning Application Nos. PA06-0018 and PA06-019 were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application Nos. PA06-0018 and PA06-0019 on April 19, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos, PA06-0018 and PA06- 0019 subject to the conditions after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application Nos, PA06-0018 and PA06-0019 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 5. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 6. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. 06-0018 (Major Modification) No, 06-0019 (Conditional Use Permit) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 O.F of the Temecula Municipal Code, DeveloDment Plan PA06-0018 (Code Section 17.05-010) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop an office/retail center and 160 apartment units is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Office Professional and Medium Density Residential for the site, G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Teme<:ula Village- Major MOD\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, The overall development of the land as conditioned, is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, The development plan for the site is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the Development Code and related Planned Development Overlay document. Provisions have been made to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes. Conditional Use Permit PA06-0019 (Code Section 17.04.010"E[ C. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposal for a drive-through facility, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the land use standards in the General Plan and the City's Development Code, and Planned Development Overlay 5, Temecula Village. The site is, therefore, properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). D, The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and develupment of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because the project site is a commercial use on commercially zoned land. The building is designed to enhance the surrounding area and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The drive-through facility will provide sufficient vehicle stacking distance and will incorporate landscaping to achieve on-site screening. E, The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood, The conditional use is a request for a drive-through facility on commercially zoned land, The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed drive-through facilities without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code" G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc F. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed project and feels it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the community. Section 7. Environmental Comoliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations), The project has been analyzed within the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for PAOO-0140. The proposed project has been conditioned to comply with the approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (attached), Section 8. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No, PA06-0018 (Major Modification) to a Development Plan (PAOO-0140) including the architectural elevations for the multi-family residential buildings and retail/office buildings to replace two speculative building pads with a retail store totaling 17,500 square feet (Rite-Aid), modification of the recreation center, and modification of the roof plans and PA06-0019, (Conditional Use Permit) to allow a drive-through pharmacy for a Rite-Aid with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of April, 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 06- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of April 2006, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village~ Major MOD\Planning\PC RESOLUTION.doc EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA06-0018 and PA06- 0019 Project Description: A Major Modification to a Development Plan (PAOO-0140) including the architectural elevations for the multi-family residential buildings and retaiVoffice buildings to replace two speculative building pads with a retail store totaling 17,500 square feet (Rite-Aid), modification of the recreation center, and modification of the roof plans" A Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru pharmacy. Assessor's Parcel No. 944-090-012,013,014 MSHCP Category: Residential! Commercial DIF Category: Residential Attached! Retail Commercial TUMF Category: Residential-Multi-Family! Retail Commercial Approval Date: April 19, 2006 Expiration Date: April 19, 2008 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Garne Code Section 711.4(c)). G:\Ptanning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2006\PA06-Q018 Temecula Village. Major MOD\Planning\COA..doc 2 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action, The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4, The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 5, The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application No. PAOO-0140, 6. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; othelWise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 7. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage (Sign program may be required). 9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 1 D. The conditions of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. G:\Ptanning\2006\PA06-Q018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 3 11, Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 12, The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building, 13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. 15. All downspouts shall be internalized. 16. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage, 17. The project shall conform to all underlying Conditions of Approval for the Development Plan (PAOO.0140). 18. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution, Public Works Department 19, It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision, 20. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 21. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 22. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Fire Prevention 23. During remodeling and/or addition construction ALL FIRE and LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS will be maintained in working order and up to their original design and performance specifications (CFC art.87 et al). G:\Planning\2006\PAOe-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOO\PJanning\COA-.doc 4 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:IPlannlng\2006IPA06.0016 Temecula Village. Major MOOlPlanninglCOA.,doc 5 Planning Department 24. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 25. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning, 26. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease, The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 27. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 28. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. 29. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 30. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 31. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition, 32. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. G:\Planning\2006\PAOe-0016 Temecula ViIlage- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 6 Public Works Department 33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b, Rancho California Water District c. Eastern Municipal Water District d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau t. Planning Department g. Department of Public Works h, Cable TV Franchise i. Community Services District j. Verizon k. Southern California Edison Company L Southern California Gas Company 34. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted, Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - t 10' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median, deceleration lane. (I) The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot. (ii) The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road. The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property, b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works, Dedicate an additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane. c, Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal equipment, loops, and interconnect. d. Design and install a traffic signal and interconnect at the intersection of Rancho California Road and the main entrance. e. Provide an additional 12' of right-of-way on Rancho California Road for future street widening, 35. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Vi11age- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 7 36. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P,C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving, b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos, 207, 207 A and/or 208. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d, Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303. g, All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground, i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. 37. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "AU (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft within a 50-ft. right-of-way. b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76.ft with a 6' sidewalk on each side. c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk on each side. d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on one side. e. Cui de sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. f. 90 degree parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. h, All intersections shall be perpendicular (90 degre.e). i. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul- de-sac or a loop road. G:\Planning\2006\PAOS.0018 Temecula ViIlage- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 8 38. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works, 39, Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Parcel Map with the exception of three openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. a. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main driveway shall have full turning movements. 40. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805, 41. All easements and/or right-ol-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in lorce until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 42. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section, Prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency, 43, Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 44. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The lollowing information shall be on the ECS: a. The delineation of the area within the 1 OO-year floodplain b, Special Study Zones c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report d. Archeological resources found on the site 45. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 46. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision, Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form 01 a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at. the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.0018 Temecula Village. Major MODlPlanninglCOA.,doc 9 47. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone. cable TV. and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 48. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 49. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as determined by the Department of Public Works. 50, A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. 51. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map, 52. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 53. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 54, A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval by the Department of Public Works. 55. Easements. when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities. etc.. shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. 56, As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Riverside County Health Department I. Community Services District g. Verizon h, Southern California Edison Company i. Southern California Gas Company G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 10 57, A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion, 58. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections, 59. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction, 60. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on.site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property, The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 61. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 62. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 63. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid, The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credi1ed to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 64. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-G018 Temecuta Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 11 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:\Planning\2006\PAOa-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 12 Planning Department 65, The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance, The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 66. All downspouts shall be internalized. 67. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions, The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown, The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c, Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans. d, One copy of the approved grading plan, e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). g. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long.term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 68. All utilities shall be screened from public view, Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after- thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities, Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 69. Building Construction Plans shall include details outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director, Public Works Department 70. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village. Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 13 71. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 72. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices, The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan, 73. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 74. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. 75. All proposed and existing utility poles and lines that are less than 33 KV are to be underground. G:\Planning\2006\PA06--o018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 14 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Vi1Iage- Major MOD\Plarming\COA-.doc 15 Planning Department 76, Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 77. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning, The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 78. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 79. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off. street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 951 696-3000." 80. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size, 81. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 82, All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. G:\PJanning\2D06\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 16 Public Works Department 83. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b, Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works d. Southern California Edison 84. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 85. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 86, The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Fire Prevention 87. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum 12 inch numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four-inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, G:\Planning\2006\PAoe-G018 TemecuJa ViIlage- Major MOD\Planning\COA..doc 17 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA..doc 18 88. The applicant shall comply with the letter (attached) sent by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health dated February 6, 2006, 89. The applicant shall comply with the letter (attached) sent by Rancho Water dated February 6, 2006. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MOD\Planning\COA-.doc 19 ~~ .J cau" iY OF RIVERSIDE. I. _ALTh ",ERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH February 6, 2006 City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O, Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Veronica McCoy o~~~ll'W~1' Jl FEB 0 \:) 200fi J RE: Development Plan No. P A06.00 19 By Planning Department Dear Ms, McCoy: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Rite-Aid at the Temecula Village. Although, the site plan indicates that water and sewer services are existing we have no recent information in regards water and sewer availability. 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BIDLDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "WiII-serve" letters from the appropriate water district. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (951) 461.0284, Sincerely, " Sam Martinez, Supervising ental Health Specialist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. Local Enforcement Agency. PO Box 12RO, Riverside CA 92502-1280 . {909} 955-8982 . FAX (909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Sheet 9\0 Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 land Use and Water Engineering. p.o, Box 1206. River::'ld>:. CA 92502-1206. (90Y) 955.898U . FAX (909) 955 8903 . 4030 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor. RiverS'Lde. CA 925[11 (~ Bancha later BoardafDir>octors Ben R. Drake President Stephen J. CO<<Jna Sr. Vic"Presid"nt Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman John E. Hoagland Micbael R. Me-Millan William E. PLumnwr affieen. Bdan J. Brady Gl.lneralManagel Phillip L. Forbes Assistant General Manager I Chief Financial Officer E. P. ''Bob~ Lemons Director of Engine<.Jring Perry R. Louck Diredor of Planning Jeff D. Armstron~ Controller Kelli E. Gatcia District Secretary C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counr<el February 6, 2006 Veronica McCoy City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 D~((;~OW~1 11 FEB 0 8 2006 :!J B" SUBJECT: Planning Department WATER A V AILABILlTY PROPOSED RITE-AID LOT NO. 24 OF TRACT NO. 3334 APN 944-290~012 CITY PROJECT NO" PA06-0019 [MJW PROP) Dear Ms. McCoy: Please be advised that the above. referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements, Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. All on-site public water facilities will require public utility easements in favor of RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office, Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 7J1~~?!1c Development Engineering Manager 06\MM:lmOJO\FEG cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Servlces Supervisor ILmcho California Water District 42135 Winchcsler Road . po~tOmceBox9017 . Temecula, California 92589-9017 . (951l296-6900. FAX(951i296"6860 wv>''''.ranchowaler,com '\ / ATTACHMENT NO.5 INITIAL STUDY G:IPlanning\2006IPA06.001B Temecula Village. Major MODlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT,doc 11 Project Title lead Agency Name and Address Contact Person and Phone Number Project location Project Sponsor's Name and Address General Plan Designation Zoning Description of Project Surrounding land Uses and Setting Other pubic agencies whose approval is required City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Temecula Village Development City of T emecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner (909) 694.6400 The south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive. Unsectioned land within T8S, R3W, located on the USGS 7.5' Topographic Quadrangle. San Bernardino Base and Meridian. (APN # 944-290-012,013,014) TV Development, LP c/o Markham Development Management Group, Inc. 41750 Winchester Road, Suite N Temecula, CA 92590 Professional Office (12.74 acres) Medium Density Residential (7-12 dwellin!] units/acre) (10.23 acres) Same as General Plan The Project consists of the following planning applications: 1. PAOO.0138 proposes a General Plan Amendment which will reorient the current north / south boundaries of (PO) Professional Office (12,74 acres) and (M) Medium Density (10.23 acres) to an east / west orientation of 7.71 acres of (PO) Professional Office and 15.26 acres of (M) Medium Density, 2. PAOO-0139 proposes a Zoning Amendment which overlays the current zoning of (PO) Professional Office and (M) Medium Density with a mixed- use office/retail (PDO-5) Planned Development Overlay, 3. PAOO-0152 proposes a Tentative Parcel Map subdividing the current three parcels, which are a portion of lot 24 of Tract 3334, into 8 individual parcels. 4. PAOO-0140 proposes to construct 160 attached single-family residential units on approximately 15.26 acres. The apartment buildings will consist of two-story structures with stucco exteriors consisting of simple horizontal or gabled parapets. The project also proposes 71,100 square foot of single story and two.story office/retail space on approximately 7,71 acres, Access to the oroiect site will be from Rancho California Road. Rancho California Road serves as the north boundary of the project site, with commercial and multi-family development located on the north side of the road, Single-family residential uses are located to the east and south, Undeveloped open area, approved by the City for multi-family residential use is located to the wes!. The only other agency approval that may be required is an incidental take permit (ITP) from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No stream channels are located on this ridge located south of Rancho California Road, therefore an Army Corps 404 Permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 Agreement appears not to be required. No Regional Board approvals are reauired. R:\D P\2000\Oo-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf I The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Sianificant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the followina. pages. I Land Use Planning X Hazards and Hazardous Materials I IX I I I IX Environmental Factors Potentially Affected Population and Housing Noise Geology and Soils Public Services Water I Utilities and Service Systems I Aesthetics I Cultural Resources I Recreation I Mandatory Findings of Significance I None Air Quality T ransportation/Circulation X Biological Resources Energy and Mineral Resources R:\D P\200Q\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: II find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. II find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentiallY significant impact" or "potentiallY significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothinQ further is required. Signature: Date: Printed Name: Rolfe Preisendanz, Assistant Planner For: City of Temecula R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Inforrration Sources Polen\lally Significant IrflJact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation lnccroorated less Than Signlficanl Impact No Impact a. 'Physically divide an established community? b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the I?urpose of avoiding or miti!)ation an environmental effect? c, Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or , natural communitv conservation plan? x x x Comments: 1.a The project site is surrounded with urban/suburban development. Residential uses exist to the south and east; multi.family residential development has been approved on the vacant property located immediately to the west; and commercial development exists to the north of Rancho California Road which is one of the major east-west arterials in the City of Temecula, The construction and occupancy of 160 residential units and 71,100 square feet of office/retail on this approximate 22.97.acre property will be an urban infill development project. The type of project proposed and the location of the project eliminate any possibility of causing adverse impact from physically dividing an established community. 1.b Based on the site's medium density residential and professional office designations, and the infill character of the project site, the proposed Temecula Village project is consistent with the village center and planned development overlay concepts presented in the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed project does not pose any significant adverse land use impacts with implementation of required mitigation. The project requires the approval of a General Plan Amendment and a Change of Zone. Potential mitigation for other issues is discussed in the appropriate sections of this Initial Study. No mitigation is required for land use issues beyond those that are already included in the proposed project Planned Development Overlay. 1.c The project site constitutes an island of undeveloped property that Is surrounded on all sides by urban and suburban development. The site does contain disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) habitat, but it is not identified in the City General Plan or any other agency plans as part of a habitat conservation plan or a natural community conservation plan. Converting the property to suburban uses comparable to that surrounding the site will require mitigation through acquisition of an incidental take permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, but discussions with the Service biologists indicate that the appropriate solution for this site is not to retain it as permanent habitat due to the surrounding level of development. If mitigation is required based on the presence of the California Gnatcatcher, the Service Staff indicates that it should be acquired offsite at a location determined suitable by the Service (See Biological Resources Section). R:\O P\20QO\QO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supportmg Informal/on Sources Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mtlgation Jncoroorated lessTl'1an Significant Impact No Impact a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example. through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housin~ elsewhere? x b. x c. x Comments: 2.a The City General Plan designated a total of 772 acres of medium density residential land use. The proposed project will convert -15.26 acres of this designation to 160 apartment units. At an occupancy rate of 2.83 persons per unit, the total population that will occupy this project at full occupancy is forecast to be 453 persons, However, as Temecula Village is an infill project where many service needs of residents are provided onsite, it is not forecast to induce population growth that will exceed the capacity of roads, utilities, and other infrastructure anticipated in the General Plan. Additionally, the proposed office/retail uses on site are only approximately two-thirds of the minimum FAR square footage anticipated in the General Plan for this site (.21 compared to a minimum of ,3), and 20% of the maximum FAR (.21 compared to the maximum FAR of 1.0). Based on this evaluation, the proposed project is not forecast to cause significant growth within the City of Temecula. 2.b The project site is presently unoccupied and the proposed project has no potential to displace any existing housing. The project will provide critically needed apartment housing units for the City, and equally important, the adjacent professional and commercial development can reduce 1he overall trip generation by allowing pedestrian trips to replace vehicle trips. 2.c The project site is presently unoccupied and the proposed project has no potential to displace any existing population. The project provides essential rental housing that will serve a portion of the City's residents which relies upon this type of housing which is in very short supply within the City and surrounding area No mitigation is required. R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 3. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and SUPportm9 Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant UnlessMlbgabon Incorporated Less Than Significant l~acl No IfllJact a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvinQ: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on Ihe most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geologv Special Publication 42. ii) I Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) I Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? I iv) I Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreadinQ, subsidence, liquefaction or collaese? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 1801-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soil incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? x x x X X X X X X Comments: 3.a A detailed description of the City's geology and soils is contained in Chapter 4.1 of the City's General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR). According to the GPEIR, the City of Temecula is in Ground shaking Zone II, which will experience moderate to intense ground shaking in the event of a major regional earthquake. Geologic mitigation measure 5 is identified in Section 4.1.3 of the GPEIR and it is deemed adequate to reduce potential ground shaking impacts to a level of no significance. No additional mitigation is required. A review of the City's Fault Hazard Zones in the General Plan (Figure 7-1) indicates that the project site is not located within a fault hazard z:one and it has a very low probability of being exposed to fault rupture. A review of the City's Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazards in the General Plan (Figure 7-2) indicates that the project site is not located within a zone of potential subsidence or liquefaction. The proposed project has a very low probability of being exposed to these geologic hazards. Although the project site is located on a low ridge, no landslides were observed on the property proposed for development. A geotechnical investigation by CHJ Incorporated reached this same conclusion. A copy of this geotechnical study is available at the City Planning Department office for review if desired. The lack of observed landslides, the low vertical relief of the site, and the shallow slopes would indicate a low potential for being exposed to significant landslide hazards on this project site. 3.b Development of the project site will expose it to potential erosion and downstream sedimentation. The General Plan requires mitigation for project to control erosion. Further, specific requirements have been established under the state-wide NPDES program that requires every project to implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction and over the long-tenm. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are identified in the SWPPP to control erosion on a site and any sedimentation R\O P\2000\OO-Q14D Village of Temecula\lnitial Sfudy.rtf generated by disturbing the site for development. Mitigation is required to control potential erosion and sedimentation. The following standard City condition of approval shall be implemented. 3.b. 1 The SWPPP prepared for this project shall implement BMPs identified in the County's Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the performance standard that must be met is to minimize erosion on the site in accordance with DAMP BMPs and to contain all eroded sediment on the project site. 3.c As noted under issue 3.a, the project site has a minimal potential for any instability related to subsidence, liquefaction, or landslides. 3.d Based on a review of the General Plan, the Friant-Lodo-Escondido Association underlies the site and it has no potential to be expansive or create hazards related to expansive soils. 3.e The project site will be served by a sewer collection system so there is no potential for the site to have adverse impacts related to use of subsurface wastewater disposal systems. Implementation of mitigation measure #5 (General Plan) in the General Plan for ground shaking impacts and measure 3.b.1 for erosion/sedimentation impacts will reduce the only potentially significant geology and soil impacts to a level of no significance. R\D P\2000\OO~0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Sludy,rtf 14. I I a. b. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: less Than Significant Impact No Impact Issues and Supporting Jnformallon Sources Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mlllgallon Incoroorated x Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been Qranted)? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in fioodinQ on- or offsite? Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of eolluted runoff? I Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? I Place within 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures, which would impede or redirect fiood flows? Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving fiooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? I Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? x c. x d. x e. x If. g. x x Ih x i. x Ij. x Comments: 4.a The proposed project would permit development of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units and 71,100 sq. fl. of office/retail space. This type of development does not generally generate any wastewater, other than domestic or municipal, which will require treatment or waste discharge requirements. No water quality standards are forecast to be violated by implementing the proposed project. Wastewater will be delivered to the regional treatment plant for treatment under waste discharge requirements established by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. During construction and occupancy implementation of BMPs as outlined in Supplement A of the Riverside County DAMP will be implemented which will control pollution to a level of no significance. See mitigation measure 3.b.1.(See Condition Of Approval, 3.b.1) 4.b The project site is located on a ridge, which has no potential to serve as a recharge location for surface runoff. Therefore, the project has no potential to adversely interfere with groundwater recharge. The proposed project does not include any extraction of groundwater, so no adverse direct impact can result from implementing the proposed project. The GPEIR addresses water demand from development in the City of Temecula, including 772 acres of medium density residential uses and 520 acres professional R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf office uses. Rancho California Water District has confirmed in the "will serve" letter dated May 17, 2000 that water will be available upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assign water rights. The GPEIR concludes that the City's two purveyors can meet cumulative water demand within the City without having a significant adverse impact on the environment, including depletion of the areas groundwater supplies. The proposed development increases the number of dwelling units anticipated in the General Plan by 37 and increases demand for residential uses. However, the decrease in commercial/office acreage (5.03) and actual proposed commercial/office square footage (71,100 square feet compared to a permissible a range of between 100,754 and 335,000 square feet under the applicable Floor Area Ratio (FAR)), and consequent decrease in water demand for commercial/office uses, decreases water demand more than the additional 37 residences will increase demand. Therefore, the proposed project will not contribute to a significant cumulative, indirect adverse impact on the area groundwater aquifers. 4.c The project site presently drains to existing storm drains in Rancho California Road and at the southwest corner of the project site. From there runoff enters the regional drainage system, which terminates in Murrieta Creek and ultimately the Santa Margarita River. The existing drainage pattern will be retained after project development. Erosion and siltation issues are addressed in previous discussions under geology and hydrology. A preliminary drainage/hydrology study prepared by engineers of Markham Development Management Group, Inc. verifies that the existing drainage system is adequate to accept the volume project runoff from the developed site without causing any significant adverse downstream impacts. 4.d As noted in 4.c above, the project would not alter the existing site or area drainage system. It will increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site, but the City imposes standard conditions to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not be significantly increased. No adverse impacts are forecast to affect properties downstream of the site from developing the project as proposed. 4.e Please refer to the discussion under 4.d above. 4.f Please refer to the discussion under 4.a above. 4.g The project site is located on a ridge and is not located in the vicinity of any identified 100-year flood hazard area. No potential for exposure to significant flood hazards will occur from developing the project site as proposed. 4.h The project site is located on a ridge and is not located in the vicinity of any identified dam inundation flood hazard area. No potential for exposure to significant flood hazards will occur from developing the project site as proposed. 4.i-j Since the project is not near any water body and is located on a ridge, no potential exists for the site to be adversely impacted by inundation from seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. R:\D P\2000\OQ-Q140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 5. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the fOllowing determinations. Would the project: I ,,,,., aod S,pporti" "'0'0'0"00 S"""., I a. lb. Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroorated c. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air gualitv plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existinQ or projected air ~uality violation? Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number . of people? x x x x I d. Ie. x Comments: 5.a The land use designations will vary somewhat from that which is contained in the City's General Plan. A total of 37 additional multifamily residential units are being proposed on the project site than would be permitted under the existing land use designations. In addition, the amount of commercial development has been reduced on the project site in order to create a pedestrian scale commercial/office development. The proposed project modification is of such a small scale and meets the objective of providing adequate multifamily housing adjacent to a commercial and job generating development that the overall reduction in trip generation and vehicle miles traveled will be fully consistent with SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG) and the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Development of the project site with mitigation measures as outlined in the SCAQMD "CEQA Air Quality Handbook" will not conflict with any applicable air quality plan. 5.b Air quality within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) is improving, and development of the proposed project will be in full conformance with the RCPG and AQMP because it contains all of the elements identified in these plants to minimize trip generation and vehicle miles traveled. The proposed project's development will ensure that the emissions will be minimized to the maximum extent possible and will contribute to the regional programs being implemented to ensure that air quality emissions in the SoCAB will ultimately be brought within the carrying capacity of the Basin. 5.c The CEQA Air Quality Handbook contains a screening table for operations and construction impacts. Under Table 6-2 of the Handbook, the threshold for potential cumulative significant air emissions is 261 apartment units. The comparable threshold for development of office and commercial development is 96,221 square feet and 50,000 square feet respectively. The project proposes 36,000 square feet of office space and about 35,100 square feet of commercial development, including an -9,600 square foot day care center. The proposed project falls below these thresholds and therefore, this project does not have a potential to cause significant air emissions within the basin during operation. Regarding construction (refer to Table 6-3 in the Handbook), the total area to be graded is approximately -23 acres, which will occur over a period of one to two months. The threshold for significant grading air quality impacts is 177 acres quarterly; therefore, the proposed project falls below these thresholds. Assuming an average of 2,000 square feet for each unit, the total gross floor area (GFA) for the multifamily project is 320,000 square feet of GFA which is also below the threshold of significance for apartments (1,410,000 GFA) and the 71,1000 square foot commercial area falls well below the 975,000 GFA in Table 6-3 of the Handbook. Based on these comparisons, the proposed project will not cause or contribute to cumulative significant increases in air emissions. To prevent nuisance fugitive dust standard erosion/dust control measures are required as conditions of grading and building permits. R:\D P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 5.d None of the activities at the project site (multifamily residences or the commercial/office uses) have a potential to generate significant volumes of pollutants or create substantial pollutant concentrations that could harm sensitive receptors. 5.e None of the activities at the project site have a potential to generate significant odors or create substantial odor concentrations that could harm sensitive receptors. R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 16. I TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC. Would the project: less Than Significant 1l1llact No Impact Potentially Significant Irrpacl Poten\lally Significant Unless Mitigation Incorpor<lted Issues and Supporting Information Sources a. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or conQestion at intersections? Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management aQency for desiQnated roads or hiQhwavs? Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incom~atible uses (e.Q., farm equipment)? Result in inadequate emergency access? I Result in inadequate parking capacity? Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks? x b. x c. x d. x Ie. I f. g. x X X Comments: 6.a A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates (Traffic Impact Analysis Temecula Village Development) for a project with a total of 454 single family units and a mixed-use retail and commercial village center on the project site and an adjacent -21 acre parcel to the west. This study was revised and updated in August 2000. The proposed project consists of 160 apartment units and 71,100 square feet of office/retail use, which fall within the scope of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The proposed project is an infill development. The TIA concluded the following regarding the area circulation system impacts: "Under both year 2001 With and Without Project traffic conditions, the intersections of Rancho California Road at the 1-15 Southbound Ramps, 1-15 Northbound Ramps and Ynez Road are projected to operate at unacceptable levels of service (i.e., worse than LOS D) during the PM peak hour...With roadway improvements planned at these intersections, and with the opening of Overland Drive overpass...the three intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or better, for both the Year 2001 Without Project and With Project traffic conditions. These improvements are now in place. Consequently, WSA does not propose any specific measures to mitigate project traffic impacts." "The developer will be responsible for payment of development impact fees in accordance with the fee schedule established by the City. Prior to project opening, the City may negotiate an agreement with the developer to implement off-site improvements in exchange for fee credits." Based on the data contained in the TIA, the proposed project can be implemented without causing any significant adverse impacts to the circulation system. 6.b Please refer to the discussion in 6.a above. 6.c The project site is not located near any airport and has no potential to adversely impact any air traffic patterns. 6.d Based on the TIA, the proposed project circulation system improvements will not cause any roadway hazards. 6.e Emergency access to the project site will be via Rancho California Road on the north and two private roads, one extending south from Rancho California Road along the west side of the proposed project and another road entering the shopping center. These two roads will provide adequate emergency access. R:\O P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 6.1 The applicant has provided adequate parking spaces to meet the City's Development Code requirements in both the commercial/office (Sub areas A and B) and multifamily development (Sub area C) areas. 6.g The project will be conditioned to provide alternative transportation facilities consistent with the road improvements serving the project site and provides a bus bay and seating with shelter designed to be used as a transit stop No conflict or adverse impact to adopted alternative transportation policies, plans or programs is forecast to occur from implementing the proposed project. R\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 17. I BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources less Than Significant Impact No Impact Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant UnlessMlllgation Incoruorated a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? x b. x c. x d. x e. x f. x Comments: 7.a The letter from United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service dated May 31, 2000, recommends that focused surveys occur within suitable habitat on site prior to any ground disturbing activities. According to the Biological Survey, the project site contains a mix of coastal sage scrub (CSS), ruderal/disturbed lands and non-native trees. Biological surveys were prepared for the project site. No sensitive plants and no Quino Checkerspot Butterflies (QCB) were identified on the property, but a pair California Gnatcatchers (CAGN) were identified. Therefore, based on the current survey, an incidental take permit will need to be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or FWS). Based on initial discussions with the Service's Staff, the preference is for offsite mitigation at a 3:1 ratio for CSS and a 1:1 ratio for the disturbed grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of resources at the mitigation site. Therefore, the following mitigation measure will be implemented. 7.a.1 The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigation acreage off the project site as outlined above for the -23 acre parcel. Prior to grading the project site, the developer shall provide the City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the proposed development. 7.b The project site does not contain any waters of the United States, riparian or wetland resources. Therefore, development of the proposed project cannot adversely impact such resources. 7.c Please refer to the discussion in 7.c above. R:\O P\2000\OO-Q140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 7.d The project site is surrounded by urban/suburban development and as an infill parcel, its development has no potential to adversely impact wildlife movement. 7.e There are non-native tree species on the site that may require acquisition of a permit for removal. The developer is required to obtain such a permit and no mitigation is required to ensure that the permit will be obtained prior to removal of any trees on the property. 7.1 Development of the proposed project does not conflict with the provisions of any habitat conservation plan and, in fact, with the mitigation outlined above should support implementation of such plans. No additional mitigation will be required for the proposed project. 18. I MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources PotenhaJly Significant Impact Potentially Sigmficant Unless Mltigatlon IncoruOfated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local Qeneral plan, specific plan or other land use plan? x b. x Comments: 8.a There are no mineral resource designations nor any known mineral resources on this project site Since the site is located on a ridge, outside of alluvial deposits, no potential for sand and gravel resources exists on the project site. B.b Development of the site has no potential to lose access to known and available mineral resources since none occur on the project site, nor is access required across the site to such resources. No mitigation is required for the proposed project. R\D P\2000\OO-Q14Q Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 19. I HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting tnformatlon Sources No Impact Potentially Significant Unless MlIlgation Incorporated X Less Than Significant Impact Potentially Significant Impact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existinq or proposed school? Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinQ in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wild land fires, including where wild lands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wild lands? X b. x c. X d. X e. X f. X g. X h. Comments: 9.a The proposed project will consist of residential, office and retail uses that do not involve significant potential for routine transport or use of hazardous materials or routine generation of hazardous wastes beyond those normally encountered in urban/suburban "village center" type selling, typically termed "household hazardous wastes". The one exception to this finding is the possibility of installing a gasoline station at the project site. Therefore, a potential does exist for this project to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through its implementation. Gasoline service stations are heavily regulated, regarding both the management of fuel on the site and required operating conditions, which are established through the County and other regulatory agencies, such as the South Coast Air Quality Management District. To ensure that the implementation of a service station on the project site does not pose any significant health hazard through the routine transport of hazardous materials for use and for disposal, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented. 9.a.1 Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or other hazardous petroleum materials, the developer shall provide the City with the following materials: the Business Plan filed with the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how hazardous products will be safely delivered to the site; managed on the site; and removed from the site as hazardous waste, if any. This will include all safety measures required to minimize hazards and public health risks as outlined in the required spill prevention, response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for managing hazardous R\O P\2000\QO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf materials and wastes must conform to local and state public health and safety requirements established by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control. Riverside County and the City of Temecula. ~.b Since significant quantities of hazardous material (petroleum products, including gasoline and diesel fuel) will be used or hazardous wastes generated on the site, a potential exists for significant impacts to the environment from upset or accidental release conditions. The mitigation outlined under 9.a above will ensure that any hazards related to upset or accidental release conditions are managed within the level of safety established by regulatory agencies to ensure such a potential falls below a nonsignificant level of potential safety hazard. Additional requirements may be necessary at the time a specific development proposal is reviewed. 9.c Since substantial quantities of hazardous materials or wastes will be handled on the project site (petroleum fuels), there is a potential to emit hazardous emissions in quantities that could cause a significant public health impact. SCAQMD Rules 461-464 establish the controls for operating gasoline stations, and each station must conduct a public health risk analysis before obtaining operating permits from the District. Regardless, there is no school within 1/4 mile that would be exposed to such emissions. These emission control requirements are in place and mandatory, so additional mitigation is not required to ensure that public health is not adversely impacted. Additional requirements may be necessary at the time a specific development proposal is reviewed. 9.d The project site is not identified as a contaminated site under Government Code Section 65962.5. 9.e The project site is not near any airport or private airstrip and has no potential to adversely impact airport operations. 9.f Please refer to the discussion under 9.e above. 9.g Development of the project site has no potential to modify or adversely affect an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan. 9.h The project site does contain a minimal wild land fire hazard onsite based on the presence of the CSS, but due to the surrounding urban development this fire hazard is not considered significant. The proposed project will eliminate the wild land fire hazard on the property if it is approved. No adverse wild land fire hazard impact is forecast to occur and no mitigation is required. R\D P\2000\Oo-0140 Village ofTemecula\lnitial Study.rtf 110. I NOISE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Unless Mitigalion Incarcorated less Than Signi~cant Impact No Impact Potentially Significant I~act a. Exposure of people to severe noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other aQencies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or Qround borne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the proiect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? x b. x c. x d. x e. x f. x Comments: 10.a According to a summary noise evaluation by Mestre Greve Associates, the project would be exposed to noise levels of approximately 64.7 Ldn from traffic noise on Rancho California Road. However, the residential uses included in the proposed project would not be exposed to noise at this level. The Temecula Village Development design buffers the residential uses from traffic noise on Rancho California Road with the office/retail development abutting Rancho California Road. The landscape elements between the office/retail development and the residential component of the project also buffer noise from Rancho California Road. The future residents of the site will not be exposed to severe noise levels. (Please also see response 10.c). 10.b Based on the discussion in 10.a above, development of the proposed project will not expose future residents to excessive ground borne vibration or noise levels. 10.c Future background noise levels will be dominated at the project site by noise generated from traffic on Rancho California Road, directly north of the project site. The proposed project permits or conditionally permits the development of use such as a restaurant, small health club, small dance/aerobics/martial arts studio (less than 5000 sq. ft.), Laundromat, and specialty retail uses in Sub Area A. These businesses may operate during evening hours causing nuisance noise to residents in the development and in the surrounding area. The proposed project also permits or conditionally permits the development of a fast-food restaurant, health club, dance/aerobics/martial arts studio (greater than 5000 sq. ft.), auditorium, conference facilities, gas station with car wash, market, movie theater, Laundromat, nightclub/teen club, veterinary clinic with overnight facilities, and specialty retail uses in Sub Area B. These businesses may also operate during evening hours, but there is a nuisance ordinance requirement to ensure noise levels are not excessive. 10.d Construction noise levels will be above background noise levels during daylight hours, but the City General Plan requires construction noise mitigation by restricting construction activities to daylight hours. With implementation of this measure the short-term noise impacts are not forecast to be significant to the surrounding land uses. R\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 10.e The project site is not located near an airport or a private airstrip and has no potential to be exposed to significant airport operation noise impacts. 10.1 Please refer to the discussion in 10.e above. 111. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered Government services in any of the fOllowing areas: I Issues and Supporting Inlorl'Tlalion Sources Polenhally Potentially Less Than No Slgmficant Significant Significant Impact Impact Unless Mitigation Impact lncorooraled lb. Ie. I d. Ie. If. a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associates with the provisions of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services? Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? x x X X X X Comments: 11.a The proposed project is an infill development within the central portion of the City of Temecula and all services are already available at the project site. The development of 160 apartment units and 71,100 sq. ft. of office/retail space will place a small increment of cumulative demand on the service systems (fire, police, schools, and parks). Based on a review of the GPEIR all of the service system impacts from developing the proposed project can be mitigated to below a significant level by implementing mitigation measures identified in that document. These measures include: Fire Service, Measures 1 and 2; Police Service, Measures 1-4, and Education Measures 1-1 and 1-6, as appropriate. For park and recreation services, those appropriate mitigation measures for the proposed project from Measures 1-3, 1-8 and 1-12 shall be implemented. With implementation of these measures, the proposed project can be implemented without causing or contributing to a significant cumulative public services impact. 11.b Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above. 11.c Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above. 11.d Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above. 11.e Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above. 11.f Please refer to the discussion in 11.a above. RID P\2000\OO-0140 Village ofTemeculallnitial Sludy.rtf 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact less Than Significant hrpact No Impact Potentially Significant UnlessM'lIgalion lncorooraled a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ReQional Water Quality Control Board? Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the I?roi.ecl's solid waste disposal needs? Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and reQulations related to solid waste? x b. x c. x d. x e. x f. x g. x Comments: 12.a The proposed project will deliver wastewater to the regional treatment wastewater reclamation plant in Temecula. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) operates the facility and it has capacity to meet the demand from the proposed project within its authorized treatment capacity. This facility operates within its waste discharge requirements. Therefore, the proposed project is not forecast to cause a violation of wastewater treatment requirements, either directly or indirectly. 12.b According to the GPEIR, adequate capacity exists within the RCWD water supply and wastewater treatment systems to provide water and wastewater capacity for the proposed project. This conclusion is also supported by urban water master plan adopted by the RCWD. 12.c The site already drains to existing storm drains in the area and a regional storm water system. The connection of this site will not cause the need to expand these facilities based on detention of storm runoff. Future volume of flow from the site would not exceed the current maximum flows due to onsite retention. The drainage analysis for the project site outlines the detailed information regarding existing and future storm water runoff. 12.d Adequate water supplies have been identified by the RCWD to meet the City of Temecula's current and immediate future demands, including the proposed project. See also 12.b above. 12.e Adequate wastewater treatment capacity has been identified by the RCWD to meet the City of Temecula's current and immediate future demands, including the proposed project. See also 12.b above. 12.f According to the General Plan and the County Solid Waste Management Plan adequate landfill disposal capacity exists within the regional landfills to meet current and future demands. 12.g By participating in the City's source reduction and recycling element, the proposed project will comply with all statutes and regulations for management of solid waste. The proposed commercial and residential project does not pose any significant or unique management requirements. R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf Regarding energy supplies to the project and region. the City of Temecula's General Plan identified adequate capacity for energy systems. Since this document was adopted electric and natural gas utilities have been deregulated and short-term shortages in electricity and natural gas will be experienced until new electrical generation and natural gas production have been installed and are in operation. This impact is not considered a significant adverse impact at the level of individual urban developments, because adequate capacity is available but at a higher costs than have occurred in the past, i.e., the commercial systems are functioning but at a much higher cost than forecasted. The energy availability issue will cause short-term inconvenience during the higher electricity and natural gas consumption periods, specifically on the hottest summer days when air conditioning loads are the greatest or during the winter on cold days. The City has adopted building codes that require implementation of energy conservation measures for new development. Implementation of these design and construction standards is considered adequate compliance with energy conservation goals and policies. The additional energy demands resulting from the project would normally be considered a le.ss than significant impact. However, as noted above recent shortages in generation capacity may require the new residents to pay higher costs for electricity or to accept short-term rolling black outs in response to excessive short-term demand. These limitations will be resolved as new generating capacity is brought on line over the next few years. This short-term electricity constraint is not considered to be a significant adverse impact, particularly since the new structures will be constructed with an awareness of these constraints. 113. AESTHETICS, Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources I Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incoroor<lted Less Than Significant Ifll)act No Impact a. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcropping, and historic building within a state scenic hiqhway? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or gualitv of the site and its surroundinqs? n __ Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? x x Ie. jd x x Comments: 13.a The proposed project will infill a small undeveloped area along the Rancho California Road urban corridor. No scenic vistas will be adversely impacted at the project location from developing the proposed project based on the surrounding land uses, which are consistent with that proposed by this project. 13.b No major tree resources, rock outcrop pings or historic buildings exist on the project site. The project site is not located on a scenic highway, but it will be required to meet design requirements along Rancho California Road to be consistent with existing development. This is a planning and design issue for which the City has established design guidelines and no adverse environmental impact or mitigation is required to ensure that the project conforms to local design guidelines. 13.c. The proposed project will be located adjacent to existing single-family units to the east of the project site. Design requirements will be imposed on the proposed project by application of standards in the Planned Development Overlay District in addition to the Community Design Element standards and design plan. Based on the City's requirement to meet these design guidelines, the proposed project has no potential to substantially degrade the existing visual character of the site and surroundings, which is comprised of a combined urban/suburban visual setting. R:\D P\2000\OO.0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 13.d The proposed project must meet the County's Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 requirements for no conflict with Palomar Observatory. Due to proximity to residential uses, the project will be conditioned to not create significant light and glare impacts onsite or impacting the surrounding area and uses. 114. I I a. lb. Comments: Implementation of this measure will ensure that no light or glare sensitive areas are exposed to significant light and glare impacts. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources No IlTllacl Potentially Significant Impacl Potentially Significant Unless Mlhgation IncorDorated less Than Signllical11 Irrpacl c. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 1506.5? Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5? Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique QeoloQic feature? Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? x x x d. x 14.a A cultural resources survey of the project site was conducted by Jean A. Keller and no historical resources are known to occur on the project site. Therefore, no potential exists for the proposed project to adversely impact such resources. 14.b The GPEIR sensitivity map for archaeological resources identified the project site as being within a sensitive area for archaeological resources. Jean A. Keller completed a survey of the site and no resources were discovered on the property. However, due to the potential for such resources to occur in the subsurface of the property, the following mitigation measure will be implemented: 14b.1 During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a qualified cultural resources monitor shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and redirect ground disturbance activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources exposed. 14.b.2 If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground disturbance activities the City shall be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist shall evaluate the resources. If discovered resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report these resources in accordance with standard archaeological management requirements. 14.b.3 If any human remains are encountered during initial grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains. Although the probability is low, any cultural resources discovered during site preparation and grading will be managed to ensure that all resource value is protected and preserved. With implementation of the above measures, the potential for significant cultural resource impact has been reduced to a level of no significance. 14.c The GPEIR sensitivity map for paleontological resources identified the project site as being within a sensitive area for paleontological resources. Due to the potential for such resources to occur on the property, the fOllowing mitigation measure will be implemented: R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study,rtf 14.c.1 During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified paleontological monitor shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the grading activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report on these resources to the ensure the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved. 14.d Please refer to the discussion in 14.a above. 115. I RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant ,,,,,,,ct Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation I.'_~.~v,~:_j Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? x b. x Comments: 15.a The proposed project includes recreation areas as part of the project including swimming pool, clubhouse and play areas. Based on the inclusion of these recreational features as part of the proposed project, existing neighborhood park utilization is not forecast to increase significantly. The residents of the development are likely to increase demand for regional facilities, such as baseball diamonds, basketball courts, etc. However, these are managed facilities where the individual users is typically integrated into existing leagues and the cumulative demand for such facilities is not forecast to increase substantially from implementing the proposed project. No significant adverse impact to recreational resources is forecast to occur from implementing the proposed project. 15.b Please refer 10 the discussion in 15.a above. R:\D P\2000\OO.0140 Village ofTemecula\lnitial Study.rtf 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant UnlessMltlgalion Incorporated less Than Significant '....ct No Impact Potentially Significant IIflI<lct a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number of restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current proiects, and the effects of probable future proiects? Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x b. x c. x Comments: 16.a-c The Temecula Village Development consists of a 160-unit apartment complex and 71,100 sq. ft. office/retail space that is proposed to be constructed on an infill parcel of land located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive. The proposed project is not consistent with the details of the City of Temecula General Plan and zoning designations as delineated on current land use and zoning maps. However, it is consistent with the concept of Village Center and Planned Development Overlay presented in the General Plan as a method of integrating multiple uses over a large site containing more than one land use or zoning designation. For the majority (eight of fifteen) of environmental issues discussed in this Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form (Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Geology and Soils, Mineral Resources, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, and Recreation) no potential for significant adverse impact has been identified and no project specific mitigation, other than standard conditions utilized by the City, will be required. For the remaining seven issues project specific mitigation will be required to ensure that implementation of the proposed project does not cause significant adverse physical changes in the environment. Specifically, mitigation is identified to control erosion and sedimentation on the site for Hydrology and Water Quality issues. Mitigation is established to prevent nuisance fugitive dust from impacting adjacent uses during construction. The project site contains coastal sage scrub habitat that was determined to be occupied by the California Gnatcatcher. Based on discussions with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, this site will not be managed for long-term habitat and offsite compensation is the appropriate mitigation to reduce this impact to a level of no significance. The project's traffic is identified as having a potential to adversely impact the local circulation system and a combination of recently completed improvements and project specific improvements are required to ensure that the circulation system operates at acceptable levels of service in the future. The site is identified as having a potential for significant paleontological resources and the possibility of archaeological resources. Mitigation is identified to reduce the potential impacts to such resources to a no significant level of impact. Mitigation is also provided to reduce the nuisance noise, from evening/night-time uses on the project site, to a less than significant level. Finally, mitigation is identified to control potential commercial lighting impacts on adjacent residential property. Based on the evaluation contained in this Initial Study, the City proposes to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration as the appropriate environmental determination to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). R:\D P\2000\OO-D140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf 17. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. I a. Earlier analyses used. Identif~ earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. I b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitiQation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the proiect. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan, 1993. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, 1993. 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. 1999 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey 45-Day Letter Report Rancho California Road Project, Merkel & Associates, Inc., June 10, 1999 5. Kading/Rancho California Road City of Temecula Biological Constraints Report, Merkel & Associates, Inc. June 4, 1999. 6. Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Temecula VillagelTemecula Ridge Development Temecula, California, Wilbur Smith Associates, August 28, 2000. 7. Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay, Markham Development Management Group, Inc., January 2001. 8. Drainage/Hydrology Study for Tentative Parcel Map No. 29140 Village Commercial and Apartments 9. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) 1997 10. Southern California Association of Governments "Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide", 1996 11. Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment-Temecula Ridge (PA99-0371), Jean A. Keller, 1999 12. Preliminary Noise Analysis for Temecula Ridge, Mestre Greve Associates, February 14, 2000. 13. Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential/Commercial Development City of Temecula, CHJ, Inc., June 8, 1999 14. Riverside County Flood Control District "Supplement A to the Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plans, and Attachment to Supplement A", 1996 15. Rancho California Water District, Steve Brannon, P.E., May 17, 2000 R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\lnitial Study.rtf ATTACHMENT NO.6 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN G:IPlanning12006IPA06-0018 Temecula Village- Major MODlPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 12 Mitigation Monitoring Program Project Description: Planning Application PAOO-0138 General Plan Amendment Planning Application PAOO-0139 Zoning Amendment Planning Application PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map Planning Application PAOO-0140 Development Plan Location: Applicant: Bioloaical Resources General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: South of Rancho California Road, east of Cosmic Drive and west of Moraga Road intersection, (APN# 944-290-012, 013, & 014). The MJW Property Group, Barton L. Buchalter, 7131 Owensmouth Ave, Suite 6-0 Canoga Park, CA 91309-7961 Affect endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals and birds). (1). The project developer shall acquire compensatory mitigatiof} acreage off the project site as discussed with the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service staff whose preference is for off site mitigation at 3:1 ratio for costal sage scrub and a 1:1 ratio for undisturbed grassland, with appropriate endowments and protection of resources at the mitigation site. The developer shall provide the City with a copy of the incidental take permit issued for the proposed development prior to grading the project site. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measures as part of the grading plan check review process. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works and Planning Department Hazards and Hazardous materials General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through routine transportation, use, or disposal or hazardous materials. (2). Prior to authorization to begin operations by receiving fuel or other hazardous petroleum materials, the developer shall provide the City with the following materials: the Business Plan filed with the Department of Environmental Health that outlines how R:\D P\2QOO\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 1 Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: Cultural Resources General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: hazardous products will be safely delivered to the site; managed on the site; and removed from the site as hazardous waste, if any. This will include all safety measures required to minimize hazards and public health risks as outlined in the required spil/ prevention, response and countermeasures plan. All requirements for managing hazardous materials and wastes must conform to local and state public health and safety requirements established by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control. Riverside County and the City of Temecula. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measures prior to the issuance of a building permit for uses producing hazardous materials (e.g. gas station). Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Riverside County Fire Department, Building and Safety Department, Public Works Department and Planning Department Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 1506.5 (3). During initial grading and ground disturbance activities, a qualified cultural resources monitor shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and redirect ground disturbance activities to evaluate the significance of any cultural resources exposed. (4). If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground disturbance activities the City shall be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist sha/I evaluate the resources. If discovered resources merit long-term consideration, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report these resources in accordance with standard archaeological management requirements. (5). /f any human remains are encountered during initial grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measures as part of the grading and building plan check review process. RID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeculalMitigation Monitoring Program.doc 2 Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party Cultural Resources Icont.! General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party Prior to the issuance of a building permit. Department of Public Works and Planning Department Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleotological resource or site or unique geological feature. (6). During excavation and hill-side cutting activities, a qualified paleontological monitor shall be present and shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities to evaluate the significance of any paleontological resources exposed during the grading activity within the alignment. If paleontological resources are encountered, adequate funding shall be provided to collect, curate and report on these resources to ensure that the values inherent in the resources are adequately characterized and preserved. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measures as part of the grading plan check review process. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Department of Public Works and Planning Department Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. (7). If any human remains are encountered during initial grading activities, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery shall be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office shall be contacted to manage such remains. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measures as part of the grading and building plan check review process. During any ground disturbance and prior to the issuance of a building permit. Department of Public Works and Planning Department R:\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO.7 ORIGINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0018 Temecula Vi1lage- Major MOOIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 13 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PAOO-0140 PAOO-0152 Development Plan Tentative Parcel Map Project Description: PAOO-0140 Construct 160 attached single-family residential units on approximately 15.26 acres and a 71,100 square foot office/retail center on approximately 7.71 acres. PAOO-0152 Tentative Parcel Map subdividing the current three parcels, which are a portion of lot 24 of Tract 3334, into 8 individual parcels. Development Impact Fee Category: Residential Attached and Retail Commercial Assessor's Parcel No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: 944-290-012, 013,and 014. TBD TBD PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Community Development Department- Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One thousand three hundred and fourteen dollars ($1314.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty- eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements 2. The parcel map shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of the City of Ternecula's Subdivision Ordinance, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date. 3. The applicant and owner of the real properly subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indernnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection, the City shall be deerned for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul, seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of R:\D P\2000\OQ-Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 16 the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify the both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fUlly in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program and conditions set forth. 5. After grading, all slopes shall be planted in accordance with the City's Slope Planting Guidelines. Jute netting will be required on all slopes greater than ten linear feel. 6. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department for buildings on Pads C, D, and E , prior to issuance of building permits. 7. The final landscape plan shall indicate street trees planted along the Rancho California Road frontage as a minimum of 24-inch box London Plane (Plantus Acerfolia 'Bloodgood'). 8. Areas proposed for development in another phase occurring not within six months of the completion of the previous phase shall be temporarily seeded and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 9. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 10. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 11. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits A through If and the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development Department- Planning Division. 12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer, Property Owner's Association, or any successors in interest. 13. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the lowest level of the surrounding parapet wall. 14. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with the Color and Material Board on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Primary wall exterior: La Habra Stucco "Cortez" (Base 200) La Habra Stucco "Meadow Brook" (Base 100) Entry Doors, Railing, Shutters Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10 Roof Lifetile California "Mission Blend" Fascia, Trim and Garage doors Frazee "Old Porch" LRV 10 R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 17 15. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 16. The applicant shall submit the architectural design of the apartment buildings for Planning Commission review. The architecture of the apartment shall be consistent with the architecture of the office/commercial buildings. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) 17. The apartment building on the east edge of the properly in proximity to Lot numbers 36 and 37 of the Starlight Ridge Development shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the Planning Department in order to reduce the negative view shed impacts. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) 18. Prior to issuance of building permits, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be approved by the Planning Department and recorded with the Riverside County Recorder. The CC&R's shall contain provisions for the creation of a Property Owner's Association for the maintenance of all landscaping on the commercial parcels, and maintenance of all internal roadway and hardscape surfaces within those parcels. 19. The applicant shall provide a pedestrian access from the east portion of the Apartment Complex to Rancho California Road. A Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) 20. The applicant shall insure that all trees planted along the east properly line of the subject development be a minimum size of 24" box trees. The applicant shall revise the landscape plans and resubmit the plans for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) 21. The applicant shall add various tot lots throughout the apartment complex. The size, content and location shall be incorporated in the landscape plans and submitted to the planning Department for approval. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20,2002 public hearing) 22. An Administrative Development Plan application shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department for all (9) nine apartment buildings, garages, carports and clubhouse proposed in this project. The applicant shall revise the architecture of the apartment buildings by incorporating the elements found in the retail/ office buildings proposed. The elevations shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission and be approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) Prior to Issuance of an Occupancy Permit 23. All perimeter and slope landscaping, including the Rancho California Road landscape planter area shall be installed to the approval of the Planning Director, prior to the first certificate of occupancy. 24. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. 25. A one-year landscape maintenance bond of sufficient amount shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 18 26. The applicant and owner of the real property represented by this approval shall join and maintain active membership in the Crime Free Multi-housing Program. (Added by the Planning Commission at the February 20, 2002 public hearing) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 27. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 28. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 29. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. General Requirements 30. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 31. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 32. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 33. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. Prior to issuance of a grading permit: 34. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the fOllowing agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Riverside County Health Department f. Verizon g. Southern California Edison Company h. Southern California Gas Company Develooment Plan 35. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. R:\O P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc 19 36. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 37. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 38. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 39. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National POllutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 40. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 41. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 42. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. 43. Unless otherwise approved the fOllowing minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207 A and/or 208. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801,802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303. R:\D P\2000\00-0140 Village ofTemecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 20 g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. I. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. 44. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "A" (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with 50-ft. right- of-way. b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a 6' sidewalk on each side. c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-fl. with a 6' sidewalk on each side. d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side. e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90). I. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul- de-sac or a loop road. 45. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 46. The westerly and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main driveway shall have full turning movements. 47. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 48. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 49. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The City prior to commencement of the RID P\2000l00-0140 Village ofTemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc 21 appraisal shall have approved the appraiser. 50. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 51. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 52. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. 53. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 54. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval of the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 55. Parcel Map 29140 shall be approved and recorded. 56. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 57. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 58. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 59. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided priorto approval of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 60. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as determined by the Department of Public Works. 61. The Developer shall construct the fOllowing public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R1W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median, deceleration lane. 62. The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot. 63. The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho Califomia Road. The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property. R:\D P\2000\OQ-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and CQAs.doc 22 a. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an additional 10' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane. b. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal equipment, loops, and interconnect. c. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and the main entrance. 64. All street irnprovement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. 65. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the fOllowing agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Departrnent of Public Works 66. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 67. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 68. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Parcel MaD Prior to Approval of the Parcel Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the fOllowing or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 69. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Rancho California Water District c. Eastern Municipal Water District d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District e. City of Ternecula Fire Prevention Bureau f. Planning Department g. Department of Public Workg h. Cable TV Franchise i. Community Services District j. Verizon k. Southern California Edison Company I. Southern California Gas Company 70. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: R:\O P\2000\OO-0140 Village of TemeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc 23 a. Improve Rancho Califomia Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R1W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), 14' raised landscaped median, deceleration lane. i. The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost for the construction of half width of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho Califomia Road) at a rate not to exceed $50.00 per lineal foot. ii. The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road. The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property. b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho Califomia Road at the proposed main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an additional 1 0' of right-of-way for the deceleration lane. c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal equipment, loops, and interconnect. d. Design and install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Califomia Road and the main entrance. 71. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. 72. Unless otherwise approved the fOllowing minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207,207 A and/or 208. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400, 401 and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through curb outlets per City Standard No. 301, 302 and/or 303. g. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground. i. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. 73. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Street "An (private street) shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft within a 50-ft. right-of-way, b. The driveway at the main entrance shall have a minimum paved width of 76-ft. with a 6' sidewalk for each. c. The easterly driveway shall have a minimum paved width of 30-ft. with a 6' sidewalk R\D P\2000\OO..Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 24 on each side. d. The driveway leading to the residential section shall have a minimum paved width of 28-ft. with a 5' sidewalk on each side. e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards. f. 90 parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a minimum safe distance from intersections. g. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. h. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90). I. All driveways providing access to two or more buildings shall be designed as a cul- de-sac or a loop road. 74. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 75. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Parcel Map with the exception of three (3) openings, as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. a. The westerty and easterly driveways shall be restricted to right-in/right-out. The main driveway shall have full turning movements. 76. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 77. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 78. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City Council approval of the Parcel Map, the Developer shall make an application for reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency. 79. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 80. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The fOllowing information shall be on the ECS: a. The delineation of the area within the 1 DO-year floodplain. b. Special Study Zones. c. Geotechnical hazards identified in the project's geotechnical report. d. Archeological resources found on the site. 81. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. R:\D P\2000l00-0140 Village ofTemecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 25 82. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site properly interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreementto complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 83. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 84. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 85. A bus bay within the property frontage will be provided on Rancho California Road, as determined by the Department of Public Works. 86. A minimum 24' easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. 87. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 88. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. 89. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Parcel Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 90. A reciprocal ingress/egress access easement shall be provided for the review and approval of the Department of Public Works. 91. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. " Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 92. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works e. Riverside County Health Department f. Community Services District g. Verizon R:IO P12000l00-0140 Village ofTemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc 26 h. Southern California Edison Company i. Southern California Gas Company 93. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 94. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site. and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 95. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 96. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 97. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 98. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 99. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 100. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 101. Parcel Map shall be approved and recorded. 102. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of T emeculalStaff Report and COAs.doc 27 103. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 104. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 105. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works d. Southern California Edison 106. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility cornpanies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 107. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 108. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. COMMUNITY SERVICES 109. Prior to installation of arterial street lighting, the developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of said street lighting into the respective TCSD maintenance program. 110. All parkway landscaping, slope areas and interior streetlights shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 111. The Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure areas. 112. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 113. Class II bike lanes shall be included on the street improvement plans for Rancho California Road. Any damage caused to the existing Class II bike lanes on Rancho Califomia Road as a result of construction shall be repaired or replaced, as determined by Public Works. Prior to the issuance of building permits: 114. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to .97 acres of parkland, based upon the City's the current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 50% credit for private recreational opportunities provided on-site and shall be pro-rated at a per dwelling unit cost prior to the issuance of each building permit requested. BUILDING AND SAFETY 115. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code; R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village of TemeculalSlaff Report and COAs.doc 28 California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Ternecula Municipal Code. 116. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pOllution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 117. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 118. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 119. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 120. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 121. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 122. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 123. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 124. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 125. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. 126. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Obtain the Division of the State Architect recommendation for the accessible restroom dimensions for toddlers from the Building Official, to implement in the building design. 127. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 128. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 129. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 130. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 131. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 132. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 133. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 134. Show all building setbacks. R:ID P\2000100-0140 Village ofTemeC<Jla\Staff Report and CQAs.doc 29 135. Sign age shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays FIRE DEPARTMENT 136. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes that are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 137. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1875 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2725 GPM with a 3-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 138. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 4 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants'shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any . adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 139. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 140. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020) 141. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 142. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 143. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be buill shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) R:\D P\2000\0Q-0 140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 30 144. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 145. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14) 146. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 147. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 148. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing, and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 149. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 150. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 151. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 152. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter g) 153. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 154. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located in locations approved by the Fire Department. (CFC 902.4) R:\D P\2000\OO-0140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 31 155. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 156. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 157. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81) 158. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) Special Conditions 159. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the wildland- vegetation interface. (CFC Appendix II-A) 160. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block wailS), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A) 161. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C. 162. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 163. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) 164. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) OUTSIDE AGENCIES 165. The applicant shall comply with all the mitigation measures identified in the attached Mitigation Monitoring Plan. (Environmental Mitigation Measures) R:\D P\2000\OO-0 140 Village of T emecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 32 166. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements set forth in the letter from the United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Services dated May 31,2000. (Attached letter) 167. The applicant shall comply with all the requirements setforth in the letter from the Pechanga Cultural Resources dated January 10, 2002. (attached letter) By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read. understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the properly shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed R:\D P\2000\OO..Q140 Village of Temecula\Staff Report and COAs.doc 33 ITEM #10 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Emery J. Papp, AICP, Senior Planner April 19, 2006 Planning Application No. PA05-0167 (Rancho Highlands 11- Maravilla) Planning Application No. PA05-0167 is a Development Plan Application and product review for a proposed multi-family, owner-occupied condominium project that would result in the development of approximately 21 acres in the currently vacant High Density Residential Planning Areas 4/5, 6 and 7 of the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan. The project is located on the west side of Ynez Road and south of Rancho Highland Drive. The development will consist of 71 buildings with a total of 213 individually owned single-family attached triplex units. Staff prepared an Initial Study for this project which was distributed for public review and comment on March 22, 2006. This item was scheduled by staff for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission meeting as a public hearing item, however, not all departments were able to provide Conditions of Approval due to outstanding issues at the time this report was prepared. As a result, staff is requesting a two-week continuance of this item to resolve issues and to prepare Conditions of Approval for the project. Staff recommends this item be continued to the next regular Planning Commission meeting on May 3, 2006. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0167 Rancho Highlands II Multi-Family DP & PRIPlanninglPC Continuation MEMO.doc 1