Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout042506 CC Agenda In compliance with the Americans \!\lith Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting v.ill enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APRIL 25, 2006 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:15 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to two matters of pending litigation involving the City. The following claims will be discussed: 1) Citizens Against Noise and Traffic v. City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC 445411 and 2) California Nurses Association v. the City of Temecula, et al. (Riverside Superior Court Case No. RIC 445394). Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 06-05 Resolution: 06-34 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts Prelude Music: The Andrews Sisters Invocation: Pastor Dominic Occhipinti of Temecula Community Church Flag Salute: Council Member Edwards ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Washington, Roberts PRESENTA TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS Mental Health Month Proclamation Miracles for Kids Dav Proclamation Architecture Week Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1 .1 Motion to waive the reading of text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 2006; 2.2 Approve the minutes of April 11 , 2006. 3 Resolution approvinq List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Edward Bvrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application for a total amount of $14,966. 5 A Resolution of the Citv Council of the Citv of Temecula cooperatinq with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as a 2% Strateqv Demonstration Communitv for Communitv-Based Transportation Planninq (at the Request of Mavor Roberts) Recommendation: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COOPERATING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AS A 2% STRATEGY DEMONSTRATION COMMUNITY FOR COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 6 Tract Map No. 29353 (located east of Butterfield Staqe Road inclusive of North Loop Road and South Loop Road within the Roripauqh Ranch Specific Plan) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Tract Map No. 29353 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 3 6.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for the agreement; 6.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. 7 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and authorization to solicit Construction Bids for the Wolf Creek Fire Station. and approval of the Professional Services Aqreement with Vanir Construction Manaqement. Inc. for Construction Manaqement. Material Testinq. and Special Inspections - Proiect No. PW01-11 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Wolf Creek Fire Station - Project No. PW01-11; 7.2 Approve the agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. to provide professional construction management, material testing, and special inspection services in an amount not to exceed $319,460 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 7.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $31 ,946, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. 8 Award the Construction Contract for Route 79 South Medians between 1-15 and Butterfield Staqe Road - Proiect No. PW02-14 8.1 Award a construction contract for Route 79 South Medians between 1-15 and Butterfield Stage Road - Project PW02-14 - including the Base Bid and Additive Bid #2, to Beador Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $4,655,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 8.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $465,500, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 8.3 Authorize an appropriation of $530,000 from Crowne Hill Community Facilities District (CFD) - Caltrans Improvement Fund; 8.4 Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $1 ,728,279 from General Fund Capital Reserves to fully fund this project. 9 Approve Economic Development Event Sponsorship Requests RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $10,000 cash and City support costs in the amount up to $6,100 for the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival; 4 9.2 Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $35,000 for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. In addition, the Festival requests that the City will provide temporary logistical support of traffic control signs and devices to assist with public safety during the Festival estimated at $1 ,400; 9.3 Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $60,000 for the 2006 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival; 9.4 Approve an appropriation of an additional $30,000 to the original budget allocation of $30,000 from the Unreserved General Fund bringing total sponsorship for the 2006 Temecula Valley Film & Music Festival event to $60,000; 9.5 Authorize the Mayor to execute the above-mentioned agreements. 10 Approve a Third Amendment for Plan Review Services. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the Third Amendment for Plan Check Services with Esgil Corporation in the amount of $157,000 plus a 10% contingency. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ******************** 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 06-01 Resolution: No. CSD 06-06 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 11 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 11 .1 Approve the minutes of April 11 , 2006. 12 Communitv Doq Park RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the development of a Community Dog Park on three-quarters of an acre of unused parkland on the southwest corner of Margarita Community Park; 12.2 Authorize staff to begin the installation of improvements to the proposed dog park site. 6 CSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 13 Communitv Services Department Monthlv Report CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 9,2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 06-01 Resolution: No. RDA 06-04 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Edwards, Comerchero, Roberts, Washington, Naggar RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 14 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the minutes of March 28, 2006; 14.2 Approve the minutes of April 11 , 2006. 15 Emerqencv and Larqe Vehicle Access Easement Deed RECOMMENDATION 15.1 Approve the Grant of Emergency Vehicle Access Easement Deed for the Habitat for Humanity property located at 28731 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-016). 8 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 16 Redevelopment Departmental Monthlv Report RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 9,2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 9 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 17 A Citvwide ordinance prohibitinq Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoninq districts in the Citv of Temecula RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030, 17.08.030, AND 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY 18 A Development Plan for Plaza Rio Vista Office Buildinq (PA05-0139) RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0139, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,680 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON A 1.41 ACRE SITE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND BLACKDEER LOOP, KNOWN AS APN 921-030-016 AND APN 921-030-017 COUNCIL BUSINESS 19 Proposed Commission Guidelines (at the request of Council Members Naqqar and Washinqton) RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Adopt the proposed guidelines for the appointment of City Commissioners, for inclusion in the Handbook for Commissions, Committees, and Boards. 10 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 20 Buildinq and Safetv Department Monthlv Report 21 Planninq Department Monthlv Report 22 Public Works Department Monthlv Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 9, 2006 at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 11 PROCLAMA TIONS AND PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, mental health is critical for our well being and vitality of families, communities, and businesses; and WHEREAS, the President's New Freedom Commission declared that mental disorders and mental health problems affect people of all backgrounds and all stages of life; and WHEREAS, the Wodd Health Organization found that mental illnesses rank first in terms of causing disability in the United States and, collectively, are the most prevalent health problems in America today-more common than cancer, lung, and heart disease combined; and WHEREAS, one in 10 children has a serious mental health disorder that, if untreated, can lead to school failure, physical illness, substance abuse, and even suicide; and WHEREAS, mental health disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, and bipolar- disorders are treatable illnesses; and WHEREAS, the U. S. Surgeon General has found that a range of effective mental health treatments exists for most mental disorders; and WHEREAS, the City of Temecula has made a commitment to community-based mental health care for all residents. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf ofthe City Council ofthe City ofTemecula, hereby proclaim the month of May, 2006 to be "Mental Health Month" and call upon all citizens, to recommit our community to increasing awareness and understanding of mental illness, and the need for appropriate and accessible services for all people with mental illness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seat of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 25,h day of April, 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Cterk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, each year over 1,300 children in the T emecula Valley are treated at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles; and WHEREAS, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles is recognized as one ofthe finest pediatric hospitals in the world; and WHEREAS, although many of these children's families do not have the financial resources to pay for their treatment, they are never turned away; and WHEREAS, the inaugural dinner and live auction event in 2005 raised $70,000; and WHEREAS, the sponsors of Miracles for Kids, REIMAX Experience and Children's Miracle Network, ensure that all funds raised support Childrens Hospital Los Angeles. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf ofthe City COlmcil of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim April 25, 2006, to be "Miracles for Kids Day" in the City of T emecula, and urge all citizens to support this annual event with your attendance and generosity. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal ofthe City of Temecula to be affixed this 25'h day of April, 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, more than 2,800 licensed architects practice in California and are entrusted by the State to protect public health, safety, and the welfare of all citizens; and WHEREAS, local architects have worked diligently to serve the public interest on such issues as commllllity disaster assistance, managing growth, housing and homeless, and preserving the architectural heritage our communities; and WHEREAS, architects work with teachers to establish a built environment education program in California's public schools to teach YOllllg people about the relationship between people and their environments; and WHEREAS, in representing architects and the architectural profession in Riverside and San Bernardo COllllties, The American Institute of Architects, Inland California Chapter, has worked with local cities and cOllllties to ensure safe and interesting structures for all of our citizens to enjoy. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ron Roberts, on behalf of the City COllllcil of the City of Temecula, do hereby commend The American Institute of Architects, Inland California Chapter, for their commitment and dedication to our community and proclaims the week of April 23 through April 29, 2006 to be "Architecture Week" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal ofthe City of Temecula to be affixed this 25'h day of April, 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk ITEM NO.1 ITEM NO.2 ITEM NO.3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager JM.~ /J/2 ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Senior Accountant Reta Weston, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. Attachments: Resolution and List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CALIFORNIA, ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, have been reviewed by the City Manager's Office, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1 ,659,209.27. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 25'h day of April, 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, MMC Citry Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City ofTemecula at a meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of April 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk I'Y OF TEMECULA ST OF DEMANDS 04/06/2006 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/13/2006 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 04/06/2006 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 04/25/06 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 1001 165 , 1190 192 193 194 195 196 210 280 300 320 330 340 1001 165 , 1190 192 193 194 196 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA LOW /MOD - 20"10 SET ASIDE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICELEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKEPARKMAINT. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES GENERAL FUND RDA LOW /MOD - 20"10 SET ASIDE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICELEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKEPARKMAINT. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: $ $ $ 492,846.14 18,375.96 151,271.51 112.04 6,717.53 653.63 1,620.00 1,627.27 468,774.21 10,178.47 735.56 73,744.97 2,487.76 17,184.81 $ 283,691.18 5,779.96 79,635.44 11106 4,994.80 636.86 543.70 2,988.14 1,173.38 22,558.08 3,017 .92 7,748.89 $ 917,750.24 328,579.62 412,879.41 1,659,209.27 1,246,329.86 412,879.41 1,659,209.27 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 662 04/06/2006 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 18,806.34 18,806.34 663 04/06/2006 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 75,146.47 75,146.47 664 04/06/2006 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 23,676.58 23,676.58 SOLUTION 665 04/06/2006 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 110,350.06 110,350.06 RETIREMENT) 666 04/06/2006 000389 use M WEST (OBRA), OBRA - Project Retirement Payment 2,944.38 2,944.38 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 667 04/06/2006 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE Child Care Reimbursement Payment 8,924.03 Child Care Reimbursement Payment 0.00 8,924.03 668 04/06/2006 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM PERS Health Admin Cost Payment 69,091.34 Blue Shield HMO Payment 0.00 69,091.34 106631 04/06/2006 006044 A 0 N CONSULTING Actuarial svcs:retiree health care plan 6,310.00 Actuarial svcs:retiree health care plan 2,960.00 9,270.00 106632 04/06/2006 003552 AFLAC AFLAC Cancer Payment 2,393.89 2,393.89 106633 04/06/2006 004765 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE Refund:Brice Reilly:Skateboad Bldg 75.00 75.00 106634 04/06/2006 004064 ADELPHIA 3/26-4/25 high speed internet svcs Sr 84.80 Apr high speed internet svcs CW 55.95 4/2-5/1 high speed internet svcs TT 46.95 187.70 106635 04/06/2006 003679 AEI CASe ENGINEERING Feb Consultant: NPDES Permits 4,139.50 4,139.50 106636 04/06/2006 009840 ALCANTARA, ANN MICHELLE Refund: Tiny Tots-Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106637 04/06/2006 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT Release Retention: Slurry Seal P~t 37,106.05 37,106.05 106638 04/06/2006 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS Lifeguard training supplies:Aquatics 162.95 162.95 106639 04/06/2006 008279 AMERICOMP INFOSYSTEMS INC Computer supplies:LC cable kit 161.63 161.63 106640 04/06/2006 000101 APPLE ONE INC Temp help PPE 3/18 Kasparian 655.20 Temp help PPE 3/18 Shelton 546.00 1,201.20 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106641 04/06/2006 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr svcs @ City Hall 401.42 Bottled wtr svcs @ Mntc Fac 218.58 Bottled wtr svcs @ CRC 129.53 Bottled wtr svcs @ T.Museum 47.73 Bottled wtr svcs @ C.Museum 40.54 Bottled wtr svcs @ City Hall 39.86 Bottled wtr svcs @ Skate Park 17.23 894.89 106642 04/06/2006 004855 BABER, GABRIELE TCSD instructor earnings 672.84 TCSD instructor earnings 311.50 TCSD instructor earnings 117.60 TCSD instructor earnings 81.90 1,183.84 106643 04/06/2006 008995 BALAKRISHNAN, PRIYA Refund:Tiny Tots-Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106644 04/06/2006 009836 BARONE, REBECCA Refund: Tiny Tots-Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106645 04/06/2006 002381 BEAUDOIN, LINDA Retirement Medical Payment 650.74 650.74 106646 04/06/2006 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS Install 8 bollards:VVinchester/Nicolas 6,315.00 6,315.00 INC 106647 04/06/2006 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS TCSD instructor earnings 420.00 420.00 106648 04/06/2006 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES Feb DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 561.77 561.77 106649 04/06/2006 004829 BOB WILSON INC April 06 State lobbyist svcs 3,500.00 3,500.00 106650 04/06/2006 009846 BON DOC, ROSEMARIE Refund: Tiny Tots - Fab 4 &5's 24.00 24.00 106651 04/06/2006 004859 BOWERS, RICHARD A. 3/24 Executive team training 4,704.00 4,704.00 106652 04/06/2006 003222 BROCKMEIER, CAROL Retirement Medical Payment 650.74 650.74 106653 04/06/2006 006908 C C & COMPANY INC EntertainmentVolunteer Recognition 212.50 Bunny costume rental:Sprg Hunt 91.59 304.09 106654 04/06/2006 005911 CA FIRE PREVENTION Membership: Steve Faris 65.00 65.00 INSTITUTE 106655 04/06/2006 003138 CAL MAT P\N patch truck materials 2,900.32 2,900.32 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106656 04/06/2006 009067 CALIF BANK & TRUST Rei Retention Esrw Edge Devel:T.Library 19,560.82 19,560.82 106657 04/06/2006 001267 CALIF DEPT OF MOTOR Renewal Fees:ATV- 501587 25.00 VEHICLES Renewal fees: ATV- 503124 25.00 50.00 106658 04/06/2006 008608 CALIF GANG INVESTIGATORS Regist:Nat'1 Gang Conf:7/11-14:NJ/RD 500.00 500.00 ASSN 106659 04/06/2006 009847 CALIF PRESENTERS Regist/Mb:Artist Cf:5/31-6/1-2:B.Beers 645.00 645.00 106660 04/06/2006 009839 CAMPBELL, REBECCA Refund: Tiny Tots- Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106661 04/06/2006 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION Entersect Police Online unlimited access 150.00 150.00 106662 04/06/2006 009843 CHAIYAKUM, NICOLE Refund: Tiny Tots-Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106663 04/06/2006 009820 CHEATHAM, JEANNIE T.Museum lecture:4/B106 200.00 200.00 106664 04/06/2006 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF Regist:Ann'l Mtg:5/15:MB/CD/GF 210.00 210.00 106665 04/06/2006 009842 CLOVER, MELINDA Refund: Tiny Tots-Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106666 04/06/2006 009849 CLOWDUS, LAURA Refund: Miss Sue's Tap/Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106667 04/06/2006 009837 COLLO, M.C.D. Refund: Tiny Tots-Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106668 04/06/2006 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES Community Health Charities Payment 150.00 150.00 106669 04/06/2006 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET Transfer radio between B&S vehicles 480.17 480.17 106670 04/06/2006 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE Misc Theater equip and supplies 170.57 170.57 106671 04/06/2006 006954 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC Plumbing repairs @ TES 424.23 424.23 106672 04/06/2006 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Apr Lease Chrg: Police Storefront 2,402.57 2,402.57 106673 04/06/2006 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON Plotter Ribbon & Ink:GIS Division 199.26 199.26 COMPANY INC Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106674 04/06/2006 007057 DERNBACH, ESTHER MARIE TCSD instructor earnings 593.32 TCSD instructor earnings 342.30 935.62 106675 04/06/2006 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable Restroom:Riverton Prk 57.98 SRVCS Portable Restroom:Lg Cnyn Prk 57.98 Portable Restroom:Veterans Prk 57.98 173.94 106676 04/06/2006 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS New Employee Glass Mugs 49.46 49.46 INC 106677 04/06/2006 005880 EDGE DEVELOPMENT INC. Mar 06 Prgss Pmt:Public Library 176,046.95 176,046.95 106678 04/06/2006 005251 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE Mobile repair svc:P\N roller 475.78 475.78 106679 04/06/2006 000478 FAST SIGNS Old Town parking lot signs 259.69 259.69 106680 04/06/2006 000165 FEDERALEXPRESSINC Mar 10-21 Express mail services 280.76 Credit: 853502804890 bill recipient -83.54 197.22 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106681 04/06/2006 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER 007028 AMERICAN AIRLINES RR Airiare:Nat'1 LCC Mtg:6/21-25 1,196.80 000871 HILTON RR: HIt:Nat'1 LCC Conf:3/12-15 1,186.24 007359 CHURCHILL HOTEL, THE JC Htl:Nat'1 LCC Conf:3/12-15:Wshgtn 959.20 005027 WYNDHAM HOTEL GR Htl:CSMFO Cf:2-21-24:RobertsG 633.87 009862 MERISTAR MANAGEMENT CO AE Htl:CALBO Conf:2128-3/4/06 464.97 LLC 007836 THINGS REMEMBERED GY Council recognition awards 443.71 002652 PAT & OSCARS RESTAURANT GY Refreshments:lnteragency Council 441.16 005027 WYNDHAM HOTEL GR Htl:CSMFO Conf:2-21-24:Simpson 411.20 005027 WYNDHAM HOTEL GR Htl:CSMFO Conf:2-21-24:BrownP 408.42 008707 BOXWOOD TECHNOLOGY GY Job Posting:Engineer/Dist.Spec. 400.00 001500 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL TRAIN DU Regist:Proof/Edit Trng:1/17:KSNM 270.00 CTR 005119 ROCKHURST UNIV CONTINUING DU Regist:Public Spkg:3/14:Schuma 249.00 EDUC 009865 RAMADA INNS & SUITES JC Htl:Nat'1 LCC Conf:3/12-15:Wshgtn 177.58 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL DU htl:Planner's Institute:3/21-26:Hazen 176.09 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL HP Htl depst:CPRS Conf:F.Hogan 144.16 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL HP Htl depst:CPRS ConfTEdwards 144.16 001500 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL TRAIN DU Regist:Proof/Edit Trng:1/17:KN 135.00 CTR 005908 CALIF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE GY Calif Employee Posters 123.97 009851 TRANSTRONICS, INC. HP T.Museum radio history supplies 114.25 007023 HUNGRY HUNTER DU Refreshments:Plan Comm Mtg 83.08 009851 TRANSTRONICS, INC. HP T.Museum radio history supplies 78.50 009864 BUCA 01 BEPPO MIRA MESA JC Meal:Nat'1 LCC Conf:3/12-15:Wshgtn 72.33 006740 RED ROBIN GY Refreshments:State of City Mtg 65.90 006714 SHERATON HOTEL RR Meal:SCAG Mtg:3/1-2106 63.83 008323 VALET AIR PARK RR: Airprt Prkg:Nat'1 LCC Conf:3/12-15 60.23 007227 MEXICO CHIQUITO DU Refreshments:Plan Comm Mtg 45.65 005786 SPRINT GR Supplies:Treo Leather Case 43.09 008845 SCARCELLAS ITALIAN GRILL GY Refreshments:Trffc Comm. Mtg 39.37 PageS apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 009863 BUBBA GUMP SHRIMP COMANY GY Bubba Gump ball cap for Presentation 30.35 8,662.11 106682 04/06/2006 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Pmt Case # 452379267=$75.00 153.83 153.83 106683 04/06/2006 003792 GRAINGER Theater stage tools & safety equip 626.94 Theater stage tools & safety equip 626.94 Theater stage tools & safety equip 191.80 Theater stage tools & safety equip 152.69 Theater stage tools & safety equip 40.03 Theater stage tools & safety equip 5.96 Credit: returned Locker, 2 Tier -626.94 1,017.42 106684 04/06/2006 008361 GRAPE STOMPERS SQ DANCE TCSD instructor earnings 234.50 CLUB TCSD instructor earnings 122.50 357.00 106685 04/06/2006 006916 GREYSTONE HOMES Refund:Ovrchged Fire Fees 6,148.10 6,148.10 106686 04/06/2006 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS '06 State of the City video production 8,000.00 '06 State of the City video production 600.00 8,600.00 106687 04/06/2006 004133 H D L SOFTWARE LLC HDL business License software licenses 5,400.00 5,400.00 106688 04/06/2006 000366 HARRINGTON, KEVIN Reimb: CPRSAnn'l Conf:3/14-16 192.94 192.94 106689 04/06/2006 001135 HEAL THPOINTE MEDICAL Feb 06 Pre-employment physicals 25.00 25.00 GROUP INC 106690 04/06/2006 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD HP Slim Desktop: Police Storefront 1,581.15 Hp 3380 Allin One Printer:Planning 862.31 2,443.46 106691 04/06/2006 002107 HIGHMARK INC Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment 827.50 827.50 106692 04/06/2006 005748 HODSON, CHERYL A. Support Payment 30.69 30.69 106693 04/06/2006 000963 HOGAN, DAVID Retirement Medical Payment 650.74 650.74 106694 04/06/2006 009850 HONG, MI KYUNG Refund: Miss Sue's Tap/Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106695 04/06/2006 009845 HOUSEHOLDER, I. Refund: Tiny Tots- Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106696 04/06/2006 003624 HOWELL, ANN MARIE Empire visitors/relocation guide layout 969.95 San Diegan tourism brochure layout 75.43 Anaheim tourism brochure layout 75.43 1,120.81 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106697 04/06/2006 009844 HYUN, YOON JIN Refund: Tiny Tots-Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106698 04/06/2006 000194 Ie M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment 11,245.60 11,245.60 303355 106699 04/06/2006 001123 INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION Misc. PW mntc tools & supplies 54.37 54.37 GROUP 106700 04/06/2006 004143 INLAND UNIFORMS Orange reflective vests w/Police imprint 904.80 904.80 106701 04/06/2006 004908 JIFFY LUBE 1878 City Vehicle Oil Chg:Bldg & Safety 33.50 33.50 106702 04/06/2006 004891 KANIGOWSKI, JERZY Reimb:CPRS Ann'l Conf:3/14-15 97.94 97.94 106703 04/06/2006 009841 KNIPPEL, JUSTIN Refund: Tiny Tots-Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106704 04/06/2006 007321 KOPP, JON R. (RANDY) 2/24 Old Town sound sys svcs 150.00 150.00 106705 04/06/2006 008715 KRAMER FIRM INC Jan consulting svcs: Planning 1,140.00 1,140.00 106706 04/06/2006 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE Printer repair:HP OJ 500/800 269.69 269.69 GROUP 106707 04/06/2006 009838 LASHLEY, MARY-LOU Refund: Tiny Tots-Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 106708 04/06/2006 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC Feb Geotechnical Svcs:Library 11,696.00 11,696.00 106709 04/06/2006 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Mar Paramedic Medical Supplies 1,826.75 1,826.75 106710 04/06/2006 009521 LIONEL'S VINYL'S Imprinted banner/tent combo kit: Police 551.63 551.63 106711 04/06/2006 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS street name signs/hardware: P\N Maint 91.59 91.59 106712 04/06/2006 000394 MAINTENANCE Regist:MSA Ann'l Cf:8128-9/1:R.West 475.00 475.00 SUPERINTENDENTS 106713 04/06/2006 004141 MAINTEX INC custodial supplies: City Hall 491.66 custodial supplies: City Hall 265.60 custodial supplies: Maint Fac 265.60 custodial supplies: Park Sites 182.53 custodial supplies: Community Theater 158.82 1,364.21 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106714 04/06/2006 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY temp help PPE 3/26 JD/JH/DH 2,704.49 2,704.49 SERVICES 106715 04/06/2006 005806 MATTHEWS, CATHERINE J. Jan-Mar street addressing svcs 501.00 501.00 106716 04/06/2006 009860 MAURER, ELENI refund: Tiny Tots- Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106717 04/06/2006 005114 MCCARTHY, CATHY Reimb:CPRS Ann'l Conf. 3/14-3/19 46.53 46.53 106718 04/06/2006 009854 MCCONNELL, MICHELLE refund: Miss Sue's Tap & Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106719 04/06/2006 009858 MCLAREN, BARBARA D. & refund:eng deposit/30630 San Pasqual Rd 995.00 995.00 MICHAEL J. 106720 04/06/2006 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS Painted Parasol Festival Event PromolMgm 2,000.00 2,000.00 106721 04/06/2006 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Met Life Dental Insurance Payment 8,169.12 8,169.12 106722 04/06/2006 007210 MIDORI GARDENS irrigation repairs: Sam Hicks Park 274.60 274.60 106723 04/06/2006 007669 MILES, KATRINA TCSD Instructor Eamings 367.50 367.50 106724 04/06/2006 009710 MILLER, RACHEL refund: Creative Beginnings 87.00 87.00 106725 04/06/2006 008091 MILLMORE'S WAX CREW City vehicle detailings services: PVV 125.00 City vehicle detailings services: 100.00 225.00 106726 04/06/2006 004002 MILNER SIGNS Facade Sign Prgm: The Farmers Wife 3,511.01 3,511.01 106727 04/06/2006 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 2000 Envelopes Finance Dept. 323.08 business cards: D. Balley/R. Donoho 86.74 business cards: M. Clark 43.37 453.19 106728 04/06/2006 004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES Apr EOC Stn Satellite Phone Svcs 71.89 71.89 LP 106729 04/06/2006 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS Feb Eng Svcs:F.V. Pkwy/I-15 Overcrossing 45,601.16 45,601.16 106730 04/06/2006 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING remove de-silting ponds/Santiago Rd 5,557.00 Service Level R Grading Dirt Roads 1,620.00 7,177.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106731 04/06/2006 007011 MORRIS MYERS MAINTENANCE Mar maint svcs:Various Prk Sites 5,354.00 5,354.00 106732 04/06/2006 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS parts for drinking fountains: Park Sites 442.00 442.00 106733 04/06/2006 008283 MURPHY, HEATHER refund: Tiny Tots- Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106734 04/06/2006 001986 MUZAK-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Apr "on-hold" phone music:City Hall 124.41 124.41 106735 04/06/2006 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION Mbshp: H. Windsor 86415/001 135.00 135.00 ASSN 106736 04/06/2006 000718 NATIONAL RECREATION PARK annual membership: H.Parkerl21539 130.00 130.00 ASSOC 106737 04/06/2006 000233 NELSON, SHAWN reimb: Mar internet svcs 44.95 44.95 106738 04/06/2006 009852 NO CALIF FRAUD Regist:NCFIA Cf:4/12-14:H.Brown 285.00 285.00 INVESTIGATORS 106739 04/06/2006 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS Apr-Jun bus.prk assn dues:F.V.l115 xx17 329.00 329.00 106740 04/06/2006 009570 o C B REPROGRAPHICS Dup. Blueprints: French Valley 546.83 dup. blueprints: Education Ctr 135.77 Dup. Blueprints: Pechanga Pkwy 103.53 Dup. Blueprints: Sr 79 S Medians 54.52 Dup. Blueprints: Multi-Trail 20.95 Dup. Blueprints: Rainbow Cnyn Guardrail 6.47 868.07 106741 04/06/2006 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS office supplies for Planning Dept. 60.45 DIV credit: item retumed/Planning -6.39 54.06 106742 04/06/2006 006721 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY workstation equipment: Cashier's Office 933.97 933.97 106743 04/06/2006 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 118.09 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 98.92 217.01 106744 04/06/2006 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY '06 4th of July supplies: TCSD 120.48 120.48 INC 106745 04/06/2006 006723 OZBUN, CYNDI Refund:Tiny Tots-Terrific 3's 24.00 24.00 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106746 04/06/2006 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY equipment rental: Park Sites 345.50 345.50 106747 04/06/2006 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PERS Long Term Care Payment 288.55 288.55 PROGRAM 106748 04/06/2006 002498 PETRA GEOTECHNICAL INC Feb Geotechnical Svcs:P.B.Sports Complex 1,507.50 1,507.50 106749 04/06/2006 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 488.42 488.42 106750 04/06/2006 009161 POLETTI, GUSTAVO TCSD Instructor Eamings 378.00 378.00 106751 04/06/2006 005820 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PrePaid Legal Services Payment 437.45 437.45 106752 04/06/2006 009859 PRICE, SARAH refund: Tiny Tots- Fab 4 & 5's 24.00 24.00 106753 04/06/2006 009857 PRITCHETT, KAREN refund: Tiny Tots - Terriffic 3's 48.00 48.00 106754 04/06/2006 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various Water Meters 723.68 Mar 01-08-38009-0 Overland Tr 57.89 781.57 106755 04/06/2006 009725 RAZAVI, MANDIS TCSD Instructor Eamings 560.00 560.00 106756 04/06/2006 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL City R-O-Ws weed abatement/clean up 5,000.00 5,000.00 MANAGEMENT 106757 04/06/2006 009855 RENTNER, THERESA refund: Miss Sue's Tap & Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106758 04/06/2006 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC furnish/deliver electrical supplies: PW 13,055.00 13,055.00 106759 04/06/2006 000352 RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR Mar assessors maps: B&S Dept 57.00 57.00 106760 04/06/2006 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & Facade Prgm: Pac West Group/RDA 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 106761 04/06/2006 003587 RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC fences/pilaster repairs: Harveston Park 6,818.00 6,818.00 106762 04/06/2006 000271 ROBERT BEIN VVM FROST & Feb Prof SVcs:I-15/Sr79s Ultimate Intrch 12,453.59 12,453.59 ASSOC Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106763 04/06/2006 009834 RODECKER, DENISE Support Pmt Account #009000206390 280.00 280.00 106764 04/06/2006 001309 RUSE, PHYLLIS Reimb:CPRS Ann'l Conf 3/14-3/19 24.72 24.72 106765 04/06/2006 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment 993.05 993.05 106766 04/06/2006 008693 SALAZAR, DONALD (SWD 000053) Support Payment 283.50 283.50 106767 04/06/2006 009856 SALVATI, CATHERINE refund: Miss Sue's Tap & Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106768 04/06/2006 005227 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF Support Payment Case # DF099118 25.00 25.00 106769 04/06/2006 001500 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL TRAIN proofreading training: A. Pina 135.00 135.00 CTR 106770 04/06/2006 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Payment Acct # 581095025 12.50 12.50 106771 04/06/2006 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL Support Pmt LO File #2005033893 150.00 150.00 106772 04/06/2006 007342 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGER Feb '06 legal services payment 1,966.45 1,966.45 LLP 106773 04/06/2006 009343 SILVIA CONSTRUCTION INC release retention:Pavement RehablYnez 70,376.19 stop notice:Tri. Control SvclPvmnt Rehab -9,979.80 60,396.39 106774 04/06/2006 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC Aug-Feb Dsgn Svcs:Main St. Bridge 03-05 8,113.06 8,113.06 106775 04/06/2006 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Senior Swing Dance supplies: MPSC 212.38 212.38 106776 04/06/2006 003477 SMITH, BARBARA Reimb: CPRSAnn'l Conf: 3/14-3/19 134.80 134.80 106777 04/06/2006 009861 SO CALIF ASSN OF NON-PROFIT 3rd annual Housing Briefing D.West 4/12 15.00 15.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106778 04/06/2006 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Mar 2-00-397-5042 City Hall 6,790.22 Mar 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac 1,606.04 Mar 2-19-683-3263 various mtrs 1,102.86 Mar 2-00-397-5067 various mtrs 971.82 Mar 2-02-351-4946 MPSC 856.32 Mar 2-18-937-3152 T .Museum 648.22 Mar 2-22-891-0550 various mtrs 326.16 Mar 2-11-007-0455 6th Street 288.76 Mar 2-20-817-9929 Police storefront Stn 281.21 Mar 2-21-911-7892 S. Side Prk Lot 131.00 Mar 2-27-287-5527 various mtrs 100.57 Mar 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chapel 79.13 Mar 2-14-204-1615 Front St Radio 26.88 Mar 2-27-371-8494 Offsite Rcrds Storage 18.69 13,227.88 106779 04/06/2006 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Mar 091-085-1632-0 T.E.S. Pool 3,101.16 Mar City facilities gas meters 1,308.95 Mar 101-525-1560-6 Fire Stn 73 656.53 5,066.64 106780 04/06/2006 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL Mar pest control svcs: City Facilities 451.00 451.00 INC 106781 04/06/2006 005786 SPRINT 02/15/06-03/14/06 cell phone svcslequip 8,019.13 8,019.13 106782 04/06/2006 007762 STANDARD OF OREGON Mandatory Life Insurance Payment 2,660.00 2,660.00 106783 04/06/2006 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS INC Res ImplY Prgm: Baird, Larry and Sara 1,467.54 1,467.54 106784 04/06/2006 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS recreation supplies: C. Museum 72.28 Senior Swing Dance supplies: MPSC 71.61 recreation supplies: MPSC 64.83 208.72 106785 04/06/2006 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Union Dues Payment 4,545.00 4,545.00 106786 04/06/2006 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Code 1,826.13 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Code 491.35 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Medics 239.72 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Fire 125.28 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Fire 13.98 Creditunauthorized wrk:Code Enforce -381.49 2,314.97 106787 04/06/2006 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL Sunshine Fund 193.79 193.79 106788 04/06/2006 009150 TEMECULA GLASS & MIRROR Res ImplY Prgm: Shields, William 4,839.47 4,839.47 INC Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 04/06/2006 11:10:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106789 04/06/2006 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY 2006 Volunteer Recogn Plaques 301.70 recognition award: Anita Pyle 24.24 Nameplates: B.Deyo & C.Carey 16.16 342.10 106790 04/06/2006 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Rekey/Duplicate Keys:Police Storefront 127.94 CENTR locksmith srvcs: Police 16.16 144.10 106791 04/06/2006 005994 TERRY'S VILLAGE '06 4th of July supplies: TCSD 103.60 103.60 106792 04/06/2006 009853 TINDER, TIFFANY refund: Miss Sue's Tap & Jazz Combo 10.00 10.00 106793 04/06/2006 009523 TUTORWHIZ TCSD Instructor Eamings 68.60 TCSD Instructor Eamings 34.30 TCSD Instructor Eamings 34.30 TCSD Instructor Eamings 34.30 171.50 106794 04/06/2006 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 222.15 222.15 106795 04/06/2006 004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA LongTenn Disability Payment 7,890.59 7,890.59 106796 04/06/2006 009081 UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS freight chrgs:TCSD/build skateboard deck 33.00 33.00 INC 106797 04/06/2006 006807 VANIR CONSTRUCTION Feb Constr Mgmt SVcs: Roripaugh Fire Stn 11,725.78 11,725.78 106798 04/06/2006 004261 VERIZON Mar various phones/general usage 1,073.16 Mar xxx-5509 general usage 147.45 Mar xxx-989? general usage 90.06 Mar xxx-0049 general usage 35.85 Mar xxx-1999 general usage 33.28 1,379.80 106799 04/06/2006 003191 WEDEKING, BRUCE CPRS Annual Conf. 3/14-3/19 74.86 74.86 106800 04/06/2006 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES INC maintenance supplies: P\N Maint Div 484.86 maintenance supplies: P\N Maint Div 43.29 maintenance supplies: P\N Maint Div 33.49 561.64 106801 04/06/2006 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL SERVICES, Apr janitorial svcs: MPSC 790.27 790.27 INC 106802 04/06/2006 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Medical Supplies: Paramedics 79.37 79.37 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 917,750.24 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106803 04/13/2006 006044 A 0 N CONSULTING Feb Actuarial svcs:Retiree Healthcare 6,730.00 6,730.00 106804 04/13/2006 009622 A & B DESERT SERVICES Theater mobil catering cart w/cover 26,199.41 26,199.41 106805 04/13/2006 005126 A E G SOLUTIONS Auto CAD drawing supplies:CIP 299.30 299.30 106806 04/13/2006 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS Misc. supplies:Tiny Tots CRC 78.06 78.06 106807 04/13/2006 004973 ABACHERLI, L1NDI TCSD instructor earnings 720.00 720.00 106808 04/13/2006 004765 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE Refund:Clare Sullivan:4Paw Dog Trng 200.00 200.00 106809 04/13/2006 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Mar DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 420.00 Mar DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 210.00 630.00 106810 04/13/2006 000101 APPLE ONE INC Temp help PPE 3/25 Kasparian 667.49 Temp help PPE 3/25 Shelton 511.88 1,179.37 106811 04/13/2006 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE Jan/Feb/Mar Comm. cultural arts grant 10,000.00 10,000.00 106812 04/13/2006 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN Membership: Kanigowski, J. 88552294 47.00 CALIF Membership: Wedeking, B. 88552336 47.00 Membership: Buran, B. 88550918 47.00 Membership:Sterling, S. 88552252 47.00 188.00 106813 04/13/2006 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN Membership:Harrington,K.88552229 47.00 CALIF Membership: Jensen, R. 33069042 46.00 Membership: VViechec, M. 88552195 47.00 140.00 106814 04/13/2006 003466 BASKET & BALLOONS TOO! Eco Devel promotional Gift Baskets 103.10 103.10 106815 04/13/2006 005716 BIRTH CHOICE OF TEMECULA Refund: Security Depst: CRC 448.00 448.00 106816 04/13/2006 005055 BROWN, STEPHEN Reimb:2- shovels & Mtg w/Clark 80.74 80.74 106817 04/13/2006 006908 C C & COMPANY INC High Hopes entertaiment: Amazing Dana 112.50 112.50 106818 04/13/2006 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Regist:Class 101-104:6/9-10 6/23-24 260.00 260.00 Page:1 apChklst Final Check List Page: 2 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106819 04/13/2006 002534 CATERERS CAFE Refreshments:IS Staff Training 94.76 94.76 106820 04/13/2006 001193 COMP U SA INC 3-Digital Canon Camera:Code Enforce. 1,111.91 1,111.91 106821 04/13/2006 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 9/28-12/31 Alarm Monitoring:Theater 93.00 93.00 106822 04/13/2006 009872 CORDERO, MELINDA Refund: Security Depst: TCC 150.00 150.00 106823 04/13/2006 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON Plotter Ribbon & Ink:GIS Division 797.05 797.05 COMPANY INC 106824 04/13/2006 009737 DAWN ENTERPRISES 8 concrete bollards:W1nchester/Nicolas 3,045.00 3,045.00 106825 04/13/2006 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 1,698.89 INC Fuel for City vehicles: FW 1,154.28 Fuel for City vehicles: FW 467.19 Fuel for City vehicles: Bldg & Safety 433.99 Fuel for City vehicles:Code/Police 331.89 Fuel for City vehicles: CIP PW 89.94 Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enforce. 77.17 Fuel for City vehicles: PVV 40.84 4,294.19 106826 04/13/2006 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION Supplies for graffiti removal 170.05 Supplies for graffiti removal 52.54 222.59 106827 04/13/2006 004799 E C S IMAGING INC laserFiche Software Ann'l Renewal 14,600.13 14,600.13 106828 04/13/2006 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS Police Dept Sign w/logo const. depst 3,004.10 3,004.10 INC 106829 04/13/2006 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS Citizen Corps Disaster Drill Banner 161.63 161.63 INC 106830 04/13/2006 003171 EMPIRE ECONOMICS LLC Roripaugh Ranch mrkt absorption study 3,825.00 3,825.00 106831 04/13/2006 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC 3/2: Planning dept van rental 107.74 107.74 106832 04/13/2006 003281 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS Police education supplies: Goodies Bags 692.96 692.96 Page2 apChklst Final Check List Page: 3 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106833 04/13/2006 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office supplies: Bldg & Safety 711.89 INC Office Supplies: Human Resources 634.78 Office Supplies:Tcsd/Crc 618.58 Office Supplies: Council/Cm/Ed 458.04 Office Supplies: City Clerk 410.70 Office Supplies: Records Mgmt 320.51 Office Supplies: Planning Dept 271.90 Office Supplies: Cip Pw 253.95 Office Supplies: Finance 138.54 Office Supplies: Rda/low-Mod 71.38 Office Supplies: eRe 54.63 3,944.90 106834 04/13/2006 009873 GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS Refund: Security Depst: Tee 150.00 150.00 106835 04/13/2006 009713 H 0 N COMPANY, THE Police Mall Storefront Furniture 251.86 251.86 106836 04/13/2006 005311 H20 CERTIFIED POOL WATER CRCfTES March pool svcs 1,700.00 1,700.00 SPCL. 106837 04/13/2006 004053 HABITAT WEST INC Mar Biological SVcs:lg Cnyn Basin 216.67 216.67 106838 04/13/2006 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: TCSD Prks 1,436.94 Hardware supplies: Fire stnslMedic 1,017.00 Hardware Supplies: Bldg & Safety 723.29 Hardware supplies: Theater 638.37 Hardware supplies: C.Museum 330.99 Hardware supplies: Planning 328.81 Hardware supplies: FW 217.72 HARDWARE SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 211.65 Hardware supplies: TCC 204.76 Hardware supplies: CRC 107.99 Hardware supplies:St. MntcfTrffc 96.81 Hardware supplies: T. Museum 66.18 Hardware supplies: City Hall 30.91 Hardware supplies: Mntc Fac 8.58 Hardware Supplies: Sr Center 8.06 Hardware supplies: Aquatics 3.56 5,431.62 106839 04/13/2006 001135 HEAL THPOINTE MEDICAL Mar 06 Pre-employment physicals 75.00 GROUP INC Employee first-aid svcs 42.43 Employee first-aid svcs 13.13 130.56 106840 04/13/2006 006688 HEMET-TEMECULA EAC Employer \Nkshp:4/20: DUBG/SC 60.00 60.00 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106841 04/13/2006 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD GIS Computer workstation supplies 2,114.05 2,114.05 106842 04/13/2006 002126 HILL YARD FLOOR CARE SUPPLY CRC gym floor refinishing supplies 3,194.30 CRC gym floor refinishing supplies 287.89 CRC gym floor refinishing supplies 71.60 Crc Gym Floor Refinishing Supplies 42.93 Credit: Returned Appl Roller Cover -64.40 3,532.32 106843 04/13/2006 008694 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Bluegrass entertainers room rentals 538.93 538.93 TEMECULA 106844 04/13/2006 004217 HYDRO TEK COMPANY Pressure washers parts:PW mntc 233.78 233.78 106845 04/13/2006 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY Mar 06 Pool sanitizing chemicals 2,080.94 2,080.94 INC 106846 04/13/2006 008516 JAMIN ENTERTAINMENT 4 sites-jumper rental:4/15:Egg Hunt 640.00 640.00 106847 04/13/2006 004265 JEWELL FENCE COMPANY Res Imp Prgm: Murphy, Sean & Shannon 4,720.86 4,720.86 106848 04/13/2006 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC Rod Run banners date chg svcs 233.29 233.29 106849 04/13/2006 002789 KIMCO STAFFING SERVICES INC Temp help PPE 4/2 Wedeking 580.00 Temp help PPE 3/26 Wedeking 522.00 Temp help PPE 3/19 Wedeking 456.75 Temp Help PPE 3/19 Shinkle 454.58 2,013.33 106850 04/13/2006 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICES Mar svcs-library system agnnnt 12,031.55 Mar svcs-library system agnnnt 1,383.27 13,414.82 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106851 04/13/2006 006897 LORY, SUSAN, J. TCSD instructor earnings 556.50 TCSD instructor earnings 539.00 TCSD instructor earnings 508.20 TCSD instructor earnings 500.50 TCSD instructor earnings 453.60 TCSD instructor earnings 453.60 TCSD instructor earnings 390.60 TCSD instructor earnings 346.50 TCSD instructor earnings 269.50 TCSD instructor earnings 269.50 TCSD instructor earnings 197.40 TCSD instructor earnings 84.00 TCSD instructor earnings 84.00 TCSD instructor earnings 28.00 TCSD instructor earnings 14.00 4,694.90 106852 04/13/2006 000394 MAINTENANCE MSA's Admin Mtg:10 PVV Staff/C.W. 4/27 220.00 220.00 SUPERINTENDENTS 106853 04/13/2006 008799 MAJEWSKI TRUST Refund: Eng Dpst/42210 Roick Dr 995.00 995.00 106854 04/13/2006 004068 MANALlLI, AILEEN TCSD Instructor Eamings 178.50 TCSD Instructor Eamings 147.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 134.75 TCSD Instructor Eamings 99.75 TCSD Instructor Eamings 50.75 TCSD Instructor Eamings 10.50 621.25 106855 04/13/2006 009869 MARCUM, LARRY refund: security deposit/CRC 150.00 150.00 106856 04/13/2006 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Mar softball officiating srvcs:TCSD 3,000.00 3,000.00 106857 04/13/2006 001256 MARRIOTT HOTEL Htl:CMTA Cf/85365291 K.Grance 4/24-28 770.36 770.36 106858 04/13/2006 002693 MATROS, ANDREA TCSD Instructor Eamings 168.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 84.00 252.00 106859 04/13/2006 009848 MEDIAWORKS RESOURCE "inside/mind of a reporter" presentation 1,500.00 1,500.00 GROUP 106860 04/13/2006 009816 MONDOSOFT INC Search EngineforWebsite: I.S. 5,400.00 5,400.00 106861 04/13/2006 004490 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING INC qty 36 lamps for various Park Sites 2,776.51 2,776.51 PageS apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106862 04/13/2006 001986 MUZAK-SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Apr music broadcast:Old Town 69.11 69.11 106863 04/13/2006 009698 NICHOLAS J. YPHANTIDES, INC Deposit: speaker fee 5/25/06 1,250.00 1,250.00 106864 04/13/2006 009337 NOLTE ASSOCIATES INC 2/17-3/16/06 dsgn svc:Bridge Fencing 7,312.00 7,312.00 106865 04/13/2006 009868 NORTH AMERICAN MEDICAL refund: security depositfTCC 150.00 150.00 MGMT 106866 04/13/2006 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Mar public notices:PW/Planning/City 1,534.50 1,534.50 106867 04/13/2006 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Mar recruitment ads:PlanningfTCSD/PW 1,035.06 1,035.06 106868 04/13/2006 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Mar display ads: Bluegrass Festival 844.37 844.37 106869 04/13/2006 009570 o C B REPROGRAPHICS Blueprint Reproduction: Sr79s Medians 2,395.28 Blueprint Reproduction: Barrier Rail Prj 104.73 2,500.01 106870 04/13/2006 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS office supplies for Planning Dept 13.73 13.73 DIV 106871 04/13/2006 006721 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY office supplies for Finance 54.52 54.52 106872 04/13/2006 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY Recreation Supplies: C. Museum 94.55 94.55 INC 106873 04/13/2006 009712 P S JOBS LLC Mar recruitment ads: PW 198.00 198.00 106874 04/13/2006 008240 PABLlTOS SPANISH ACADEMY TCSD Instructor Eamings 140.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 140.00 TCSD Instructor Eamings 140.00 420.00 106875 04/13/2006 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPANY Special Events Golf Cart Rental:Code Enf 136.80 136.80 106876 04/13/2006 002331 PEP BOYS INC equip parts & supplies for PW Maint 32.30 32.30 106877 04/13/2006 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 400.30 400.30 106878 04/13/2006 000249 PETTY CASH prizes for Spring Egg Hunt 4/15/06 200.00 200.00 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106879 04/13/2006 000253 POSTMASTER Express Mail & Postal Svcs 87.50 87.50 106880 04/13/2006 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY Mar recruitment ads: PlanningfTCSD/PW 5,815.97 INC Mar display ads: Bluegrass Festival 231.20 6,047.17 106881 04/13/2006 003493 PRO-CRAFT Res ImplY Prgm: Lillie, John and Cherie 849.00 849.00 106882 04/13/2006 004529 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY- Mar motorcycle maintlrepair: Tem. Police 2,342.88 2,342.88 DAVIDSON 106883 04/13/2006 002072 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST- aerial imagery/digital elevation data 20,900.00 20,900.00 FEES 106884 04/13/2006 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various Water Meters 3,186.95 Various Water Meters 570.34 Fire stn 73 Water Meters 205.67 Mar 01-05-11040-1 Maint Fac 70.22 Various Water Meters 66.57 4,099.75 106885 04/13/2006 003761 RANCHO METALS & SUPPLY metal supplies for TCSD Maint 12.13 12.13 106886 04/13/2006 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING electrical supplies: Park Sites 77.26 electrical supplies: Old Town 35.43 112.69 106887 04/13/2006 002110 RENTAL SERVICE equipment rental for PW Maint 10.72 10.72 CORPORATION 106888 04/13/2006 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Rod Run patrol svcs: 3/10-11/06 12,224.66 12,224.66 106889 04/13/2006 009652 ROYAL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION Mar tenant implY svcs: Police Stn @ Mall 79,467.82 79,467.82 INC 106890 04/13/2006 001942 S C SIGNS Mar posting public notices: Planning 2,075.00 Feb posting public notices: Planning 2,075.00 Mar posting public notices: City Clerk 1,020.00 Feb posting public notices: City Clerk 935.00 Jan posting public notices: Planning 835.00 Jan posting public notices: City Clerk 455.00 7,395.00 106891 04/13/2006 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE Mar recruitment ads: PlanningfTCSD 3,057.11 3,057.11 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 106892 04/13/2006 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Mar 2-05-791-8807 various mtrs 8,530.91 Apr 2-02-351-5281 CRC 4,861.91 Apr 2-27-805-3194 Theater 4,357.23 Apr 2-20-798-3248 C. Museum 1,148.92 Apr 2-10-331-2153 TCC 774.95 19,673.92 106893 04/13/2006 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL pest control services: R.R Sports Park 84.00 INC pest control services: CRC 84.00 168.00 106894 04/13/2006 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD Instructor Eamings 252.00 252.00 106895 04/13/2006 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS office supplies for P\N Depts 62.90 62.90 106896 04/13/2006 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Fire 1,459.55 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: 591.33 City vehicle repair/maint svcs: Medics 357.50 2,408.38 106897 04/13/2006 009870 TEMECULA VALLEY HOUSE OF refund: security depositfTCC 150.00 150.00 106898 04/13/2006 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & irrigation/plumbing supplies: Park Sites 6.01 6.01 SUPPLY 106899 04/13/2006 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith services: Park Sites 25.41 25.41 CENTR 106900 04/13/2006 003862 THYSSENKRUPP Apr-Jun Elevator Maintllnspect:City Hall 375.00 ELEVATOR.BRNCH 37 Apr-Jun Elevator Maintllnspect:T. Mus. 375.00 Apr-Jun Elevator Maintllnspect: W.V\ling 375.00 Chair Lift Maintllnspect SVc: C.Theater 100.00 Apr-Jun Elevator Maintllnspect: Crc 100.00 Apr-Jun Elevator Phone Monitoring: T.Mus 15.00 Apr-Jun Elevator Phone Monitoring: C.H. 15.00 Apr-Jun Elevator Phone Monitoring:W.V\ling 15.00 1,370.00 106901 04/13/2006 009176 TICKET ENVELOPE COMPANY 20,000 Ticket Envelopes: C. Theater 1,827.20 1,827.20 106902 04/13/2006 002452 TOP LINE INDUSTRIAL equip parts and supplies for P\N Maint 47.41 equip parts and supplies for P\N Maint 4.51 51.92 106903 04/13/2006 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC maint supplies for P\N Maint Div 172.40 172.40 106904 04/13/2006 009726 TRI-M SYSTEMS GPS antennas for City Fire vehicles 323.00 323.00 Page:8 apChkLst 04/13/2006 10:41:53AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 137.60 137.60 106905 04/13/2006 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT Apr undrgrnd svcs alert tickets:PW 106906 04/13/2006 004261 VERIZON Apr various phones/general usage 106907 04/13/2006 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Mar access-C. Mus.phone line Mar access-CRC phone line 106908 04/13/2006 009101 VISION ONE INC Mar Showare ticket sales: C.Theater 106909 04/13/2006 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC Maint. Facility Custodial Supplies 106910 04/13/2006 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 3/1-15/06 Citywide Tree Trimming Svcs 570.00 651.72 352.64 724.80 103.55 5,340.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 570.00 1,004.36 724.80 103.55 5,340.00 328,579.62 Page:9 ITEM NO.4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager V 1112. tf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mitch Aim, Chief of Police DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application for a total amount of $14,966. BACKGROUND: The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) is awarded by Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). It allows local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime. This grant replaces the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) program that has funded law enforcement projects within the CityofTemecula in previous years. Review requirements for submission of the JAG grant proposal to the BJA include: 1. 30 day review period by the community with an opportunity to comment. 2. Approval of the application by the City Council. A notice was published in the local papers on Monday March 6, 2006 outlining the grant application. The notice invited the public to review a copy of the grant application posted in the law library at City Hall and to submit written comments or to make verbal comments in person on the date of action. The 2006 JAG proposal requests funds to purchase equipment to streamline the citation tracking capabilities of the Temecula Police Department traffic division. These funds will be used to purchase handheld citation systems to write traffic citations, record the information into a central database and download the information to the court. This will dramatically reduce the processing time for citations and allow our officers to be on the street keeping our drivers safe, rather than entering information at the station. FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriation of the $14,966 for this grant, along with offsetting revenues will be included in the FY06-07 Police Department operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application. City of Temecula Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application Program Narrative Proposal to Streamline the Citv of Temecula Traffic Division Citation Process Program Challenges As one of the fastest-growing cities in Riverside County, Temecula faces a significant challenge to keep pace with rapid population growth. Between 1990 and 2005, Temecula grew in population from 27,099 to 81,397, a 200% growth rate. As thousands of new homes are built and many new businesses locate within the City, traffic congestion and associated traffic collisions have become a major concem. In addition, as of 2000, 42.6% of Temecula's households were reported to have children under the age of 18. As these children mature and reach driving age we encounter additional traffic challenges such as speed related accidents associated with a lack of experience. The City of Temecula has maintained a proactive enforcement program. Our traffic enforcement division comprised of thirteen motorcycle officers and six automobile officers is the one of the largest in Riverside County for a City of our population. As we grow, however, we need to work smarter to maintain our proactive pattern. Part of our plan is to streamline our citation processing and statistics gathering by implementing an automated citation program. The City of Temecula traffic division currently uses a relational database to track all citations and traffic collisions. This database is crucial to planning future enforcement operations as well as determining road design changes which helps to keep our drivers safe. Data is entered into the database manually by an Officer who enters all citations and reports. This is an extremely time consuming process which requires at least 10 hours a week of Officer time. In addition, there is a greater chance of errors as handwritten citations can be difficult to read and data entry errors are also possible. Program Solutions In this next fiscal year we have applied for grant funding through the Office of Traffic Safety to purchase an interface system. This system comprised of software and thirteen handheld citation devices will feed directly into the Police Department's traffic citation database eliminating the need to manually enter most of our citations. In addition, the system will allow the information to be transmitted directly to the courts. The Police Department database will also synchronize with the City Public Works database, allowing them to have up to date traffic information in order to model design improvements. Due to the cost of implementation, however, we have only requested enough systems to outfit our thirteen motorcycle officers. The Temecula Police Department proposes to use Justice Assistance Grant funds to purchase and outfit our six automobile traffic officers with handheld citation devices. These automobile officers are responsible for regnlar patrol and citation processing and along with our motorcycle officers are responsible for over 90% of the citations written within the City of Temecula. In 2005 our Traffic division wrote and processed a total of 13,949 citations, an increase of 1,398 from the previous year. Automating this citation processing throughout our traffic division will reduce manhours and allow our Officers to focus on what they do best, education and enforcement. City of Temecula Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Proposal Page 2 of5 Budget Narrative E. Supplies - List items by type (office supplies, postage, training materials, copying paper and expendable equipment items costing less than $5,000, such as books, hand held tape recorders) and show the basis for computation. (Note: Organization's own capitalization policy may be used for items costing less than $5,000). Generally, supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the proj ect. The City of Temecula will purchase an automated citation system as part of phase one of our traffic citation technology streamlining project. The first phase will be funded by a grant through the Office of Traffic Safety. This automated system will allow 13 motorcycle traffic officers to input, manage and print traffic citations in the field. This equipment will feed directly into the Police Department's traffic citation database and will allow the information to be transmitted directly to the courts. In addition, the Police Department database will synchronize with the City Public Works database, allowing them to have up to date traffic information in order to model design improvements. Phase two of this project will be funded by the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). The supplies requested in this grant will tie into this new automated citation system and will allow our six automobile traffic officers to utilize the system. Due to this grant we will be able to equip the entire traffic division- which is responsible for over 90% of citations within the City of Temecula - in order to streamline and coordinate the citation process. Supply Items Computation Cost Handheld Traffic Citation System Handheld Bluetooth Printers with Mag. Stripe Readers Handheld Printer Wall Chargers ($57.14/each x 6 sets) Memory Cards for Handhelds ($45. OO/each x 6 sets) Memory Card Readers ($25. OO/each x 6 sets) Thumbprint Readers ($185. OO/each x 6 sets) Handheld Printer Car Chargers ($92. 86/each x 6 sets) Handheld Printer Paper (150 cites/roll) ($324. OO/each x 10 sets) ($678. 57/each x 6 sets) ($871. 43/each x 6 sets) $4,071.43 $5,228.57 $342.86 $270.00 $150.00 $1,110.00 $557.14 $3,240.00 TOTAL $14,970.00 c:\ WINDOWS\apsdoc\nettemp\14528\$ASQpdf797450 .doc City of Temecula Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Proposal Page 3 of 5 Budget Summary - When you have completed the budget worksheet, transfer the totals for each category to the spaces below. Compute the total direct costs and the total project costs. Indicate the amount of Federal requested and the amount of non-Federal funds that will support the project. Budget Category Amount A. Personnel $0 B. Fringe Benefits $0 C. Travel $0 D. Equipment $0 E. Supplies $14,970.00 F. Construction $0 G. Consultants/Contracts $0 H. Other $0 Total Direct Costs $14,970.00 I. Indirect Costs $0 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $14,970.00 Federal Request $14,966.00 Non-Federal Amount $4.00 c:\ WINDOWS\apsdoc\nettemp\14528\$ASQpdf797450 .doc City of Temecula Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Proposal Page 4 of5 Review Narrative On Monday, 3/6/06, the following notice will be published in the local media, on the City of Temecula website and at three locations around City Hall. Notice of Availabilitv for review and comment THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CONSIDERATION OF A GRANT APPLICATION has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter described below. Case No: Grant Application - Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant City of Temecula Police Department Citywide The City of Temecula Police Department is applying for grant funds to streamline the processes of the City's Traffic Division. Applicant: Location: Proposal: Any person may submit written comments to the Temecula Police Department before the date of action or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the grant at the date of action. The proposed grant application may be viewed in the Law Library, in the City Clerk's Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the grant may be addressed to Heidi Schrader, City of Temecula Police Department, (951) 551-5405. PLACE OF ACTION Citv Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula. California April 25. 2006 7:00 PM DATE OF ACTION TIME OF HEARING c:\ WINDOWS\apsdoc\nettemp\14528\$ASQpdf797450 .doc City of Temecula Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Proposal Page 5 of 5 On the date of 4/25/06, the following agenda report will be sent to the Temecula City Council for consent and approval by the local goveming body. TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mitch Aim, Chief of Police DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application for a total amount of $14,966. BACKGROUND: The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program (JAG) is awarded by Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). It allows local governments to support a broad range of activities to prevent and control crime. This grant replaces the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant (LLEBG) program that has funded law enforcement projects within the City of Temecula in previous years. Review requirements for submission of the JAG grant proposal to the BJA include: 1. 30 day review period by the community with an opportunity to comment. 2. Approval of the application by the City Council. A notice was published in the local papers on Monday March 6, 2006 outlining the grant application. The notice invited the public to review a copy of the grant application posted in the law library at City Hall and to submit written comments or to make verbal comments in person on the date of action. The 2006 JAG proposal requests funds to purchase equipment to streamline the citation tracking capabilities of the Temecula Police Department traffic division. These funds will be used to purchase handheld citation systems to write traffic citations, record the information into a central database and download the information to the court. This will dramatically reduce the processing time for citations and allow our officers to be on the street keeping our drivers safe, rather than entering information at the station. FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriation of the $14,966 for this grant, along with offsetting revenues will be included in the FY06-07 Police Department operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Application. c:\ WINDOWS\apsdoc\nettemp\14528\$ASQpdf797450 .doc ITEM NO.5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager JM.~ IJIl tf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Cooperating with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as a 2% Strategy Demonstration Community for Community-Based Transportation Planning (at the Request of Mayor Roberts) PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COOPERATING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AS A 2% STRATEGY DEMONSTRATION COMMUNITY FOR COMMUNITY-BASED TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BACKGROUND: In November 2005 WRCOG was approved to begin work on a grant received from CAL TRANS to study the opportunities and benefits of transit oriented development in Western Riverside County. WRCOG selected 6 proposed transit stations throughout the region to identify the potential for Transit Oriented Development (TOO's) in the quarter mile surrounding the proposed station. The transit stations are located in the cities of Corona, Riverside, Moreno Valley at March, Hemet, Perris and Temecula. This grant included funding to study the market conditions and economic feasibility of transit oriented development at existing and potential rail and bus stations. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) came up with the 2% Strategy Policy to meet requirements under the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) especially as it pertains to air quality. By promoting transit related development (TOO) there is a belief that this will reduce car trips, therefore reducing air pollution and ultimately aiding in controlling air quality. The 2% Strategy relates to 2% of the land available in the SCAG region in urban areas. It is the intent that 2% of the available urbanized land will accommodate this type of development. City staff has been actively involved with the Transit Oriented Development Advisory Group which has been assembled to work with WRCOG in an effort to provide direction and assist in prioritizing problems, develop strategies, and outline goals forthe TOD program. This resolution solidifies this working relationship to further enhance the planning effort for the Temecula Transit Center. The City of Temecula has identified the preferred location for the development of the Temecula Transit Center to be located on the Riverside County Flood Control property northwest of JeffersonlWinchester. Formal agreements for this joint use are still being discussed by both the City of Murrieta and Riverside County Flood Control. In addition, the Temecula Transit Center is the recipient of several Federal Transit Administration Grants that will assist in the development and partnership of this project with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA). FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 06- RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COOPERATING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SCAG) AS A 2% STRATEGY DEMONSTRATION COMMUNITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Temecula is participating with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) and its partners (Southern California Association of Governments, UCR Center for Sustainable Suburban Development, Riverside County Transportation Commission, Riverside Transit Agency, California Department of Transportation, and the County of Riverside) in a study to examine the potential for transit oriented development (TOD) in certain locations in western Riverside County; and Section 2. The City of Temecula has been designated as a priority transit center location for the WRCOG TOD Study; and Section 3. The City of Temecula's transit center is located in a 2% Strategy Opportunity Area; and Section 4. WRCOG submitted an application to the Southern California Association of Governments on behalf of the City of Temecula to be designated a 2% Strategy Demonstration Community in order to leverage its community-based transportation planning grant resources; and Section 5. The Southern California Association of Governments has awarded Demonstration Community Status to the City of Temecula along with consultant services that will be used to perform station area planning; and Section 6. The planning effort will emphasize strategies to better coordinate land use and transportation decision-making, targeting growth around existing and planned transit stations; including: . detail specific local actions that support the 2% Strategy, as well as document impacts and benefits; . increase and facilitate the ease of use of various planning tools that support the goals of the 2% Strategy; . identify regulations that need to be revised to facilitate mixed-use multi-modal station areas/corridors; . develop policies that encourage a variety of housing types to accommodate changing demographic and lifestyle needs; . encourage design standards that focus on the efficient movement of pedestrian traffic and other non-automobile modes of transit. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, the City of Temecula accepts the designation of a 2% Strategy Demonstration Community and is willing to participate and guide the station area planning work, and to provide in-kind staff services to support the planning effort. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of April, 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of April, 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk ITEM NO.6 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~( iJ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 29353, Located East of Butterfield Stage Road inclusive of North Loop Road and South Loop Road Within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Gerald L. Alegria, Senior Engineer - Land Development RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 29353 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for the agreement, and 3) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 29353 is a fifteen (15) lot subdivision located at east of Butterfield Stage Road inclusive of North Loop Road and South Loop Road within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The map contains fifteen (15) lots for a residential development project. Certain street improvements associated with the development of this map are required. The survey monuments are required to be set. On November 26, 2002, the City Council approved the Roripaugh Ranch Project consisting of: Annexation PA94-0073, General Plan Amendment PA99-0298, Specific Plan PA94-0075, Change of Zone PA94-0075, Environmental Impact Report PA94-0076, Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 PA01-0230, Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 PA01-0253, and Development Agreement PA99-0299. A second reading was held on December 17, 2002. The Phasing Map for Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 PA03-0040 was approved on April 7, 2003. Recordation of this map will allow the developer to sell these lots to merchant builders. These lots will be further subdivided in accordance with the land use requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Subsequently, some conditions have been deferred to the recordation of future subdivision maps, as they are more applicable to those maps. Future subdivisions will consist of single family residential lots. The site is currently vacant. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the previously approved tentative map is a mandatory ministerial act under State Law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1) Development Fee Checklist 2) Fees & Securities Report 3) Project Vicinity Map 4) Tract Map No. 29353 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. TRACT MAP NO. 29353 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project. FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Flood Control (ADP) Paid. Development Impact Fee This fee will be collected prior to issuance of building permits. CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT TRACT MAP NO. 29353 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 8,468,500.00 $ 4,234,250.00 Water $ 571,500.00 $ 287,750.00 Sewer $ 39,000.00 $ 19,500.00 TOTAL $ 9,079,000.00 $ 4,539,500.00 Monumentation $ 51,500.00 - DATE: April 25, 2006 DEVELOPMENT FEES RCFC&WCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid Development Impact Fee $ *TBD SERVICE FEES Planning Fee $ 561.00 Fire Fee $ 205.00 TCSD Fee $ 975.00 Plan Check Fee $ 9,526.00 Monumentation Inspection Fee $ 2,575.00 Fees Paid to Date $ 13,842.00 Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00 *To Be Determined PROJECT SITE TEMECULA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w CALlrORN1A 80.1\.0 VICINITY MAP N N. To S. PREPARED BY' ~ ~AVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. 800 North Haven Avenue, Suite 300 Ontario California 91764 TEL: (909)481-5750' FAX: (909)481-5757 CITY OF TEMCULA TRACT MAP NO. 29353 VICINITY MAP ~ I: '- "" ~ rJr ~ "'~ ~ 'Ii V) 5~.~ It:: · ~ 8 ~ " , ~ < z e (Y) ~L[) ~ (Y) sO) ~N " ;to:! z~ o . i=tn ~~ ~N ~ o~ . z~ g~ 2;:r:- ~s <a ~~ z~ O' 0~ >. 60 ~e ~. ~;; <z "g ze wU ~~ ..; o ~ ~ ~O ~Z z ~ o U ~f- ~O ;<( ~a: u ~f- ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ 0,....- - o~ ~~':;Vi ..,"'........ 0,0::>1:)1:) "'<\"-.1-.1 00 ~~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~~~~ :~~~ ~t:;~~ <.:>~~<:: 01; ;,1 ! : i S~~~~; ~ ". ~ ~~ ~ ~~:~ ~ ~~i!: _ ~!;~ : ~~~~ i': ~~'i:~ ~ !~~~ ~~~:;; ~!i~ ii:"'"," h. ~~~~ [;:i 'o,~ ::::i ~~'-;;; ~ ;~~~ " :rtJ:it ~ i~"0 lJoj ~1~~ Yl ;:!"'c,,- i\: ~~~~ ':tJ "'....0:<: '" ..," ~ ~~~~ cs ~"'"o: "- <.> o ~ ~ ~ ,; i!i vig ~o "N 0>- 5l~ ~=> o~ ~.., III ~ > '" o ~ , , ~ ~ - ~ S~ ~ ~ .. -< . 0' ~~ ~ ~ at ~ ~. ~ lSi ~ ~~ ~ . ~ !i : ; ~ ~ ~~ i '" -'- << g ~ ~ ~ 0 .0 ~ , " ~ I , . o ~ . . ~ : - , . ~ ~ ~ ,. ~J <0 ." !i ~~ ., g , . . :i..;~t: ",~~':E: . ~~"';lg~ ~<:.i5,,-,:;~ t..;~~~~ ~~~~$~ """~'-:3 ~~~~~~ l:';>:...:'!$: !lm ~I~....~"", ~<s~::;i ~ ~~~;;~ f..;: "'~-J"'''>- G ~~;t~~~ ;-:::; ~~~~~~ I :-... ~~":O>~'" :i; ;;:: "'",~"..~ r,;: "<",,,,,~...", ~ _~<l.~~o (,,3 ~:~~8~ ~ t:;'.:~:~~ ~ 00'0'- tl"fl~i"~ ..fli5"',," ~ ~;;:~~~~ ~ ~ :~~~~~ ~ ~ ~" ~~ 2~ ~I :~ ~~. ~:"~ ~- ~- ~~ i~ ~i '. .0 '" "'" ",U U). ~~ ~~ v :s~ ~. i; ~~ ~~ ~O; ~~ ~~ ~; ~~ :; ;~ :~ ::lEi' ~l:; ~~ ~~ ~:!l ;t: ~~ ~i!: j ~B, ~~~~~~~:~ ~'S;g~~~l1i~';!i :;)..." ~"'''''",I1'- ~\<;~~~~~;;;~~ <:l/::,,,,_'" >:>' >: ~~€~~~~~:~ ~~:~~~~~~; g~~<=:",~~~-J~ ~~~';(g~~~ ~~t~~6~~~~ ~2~~~~~~~; S!"'_.."'....t:;..."'~ ~i:.:~~15~~:J~5 ~~~~::~-g~~ . i!.~':r<~;::~5~~ ~~'-~15t:i~::.e"'~ "%~,,,,):'.: ~,,;""' ~;[~~=~~~~~ ;-~~~~~'"~i?';t: ~~~~:J~3~~i!:i!: 2~..8~:l1ig::~E 'I:l"'~....,,~........~;,;~ ~~~~n~~~l1i~ ~,,)"~~"~"'"...i3 ~~lsiE"'~~gi!:~'" ~2:~~t:~:::i~.:~:::i ':;:~-:::;::~"'-:;~ ~~~;:::...~~~..~ ~-:~~~~g::g:l:; ;o;':2~..."'''....-....~i5 ~~~<;~::;~~~~;:: ..~P-"...~ '" ;, ~:!~3~~~~~~~ " ~~ ~.,,; l:l:::'';: ~:~ ::::5'" ,.. ~.c ~~~ o.!i!~ ~;! ""' -" Sli'" ~~~ ~i5~ --, "" 00. .," ;~~ ,I ~ , ~ Q'" ,'0 :8~ .:<i;),.. ~~i 0<0 ~ ~ , , i o. i~ " .. '" ~~s .>0 __0: ~~ ~~~ ~p!, ~~;", ~- E~~a ~~ ~i!5i! ~~ "'!O"t;; ~~I~ ~~ "'g::;i!: 8~ e;:<>....2 l'-~ "=::.<:l", '" ~~~~ ~G "''''''- .,,,, "':;':""...", ~~~~ ~B ....'" ..." ~L~ ",. "'''''''- ,.,,, . " tl~<,j'"' .,l:l :~...~ ~~ <:l~l:;::. "'.... i::';::';:~ -Q ~~~= ~~ ~~~~~: ~~ ':;~~l:; "'15. -" ~::-~~ ~:~ ~~ - 0:: i!:... ';t.:':r ~~;g ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~~ i;~: ~;: ;~ ~G~-": 'di ~~ , ~ ~t ,0 . i~ ~~~2~ 1;;<::'5ieU "''''''_0 -...,....." <'>'" -l- \;; ~ ,.-. ~ ~:~~~ ~ 5""'''''< Vj '0'," l(\ ":ao:e'll !Jj .oe," ~i!m t ",,' <J ~5~~~ . < ~a" ~~~i ~~13~ ~~~~ ....""..0. 0_ '" ~~~: ....."''"'" ~~~~ ~~~: ~~~~ I.. ...._"'''' ~ ~i~2 ~ ~i5~~ ~ "'1;"''''' b::: ~~~~ n..: ~"'~~ 8 ;~~~ ~~:~ !(\ e~~~ ~ ...~~..... ti ~l;; ~~ lij "'~15:;: '-I ~~~~~ ~ ~~s~~ ~....~~;:: ~ ~~~~~ ~ ~:;;~;,;:;; ~ '. .. ~o. ~~ ~~ ~~ !5~ "'iE " ~; ~; ~~ :~ ~~ :~ ;1 ~,I ~~ -, ., ~. ~! ~~ ~i:3 .. ,..~ ~~ o. ~8 :::~ ~~ ~~ ~: i: . ~"'e; ::13::; ~....::; ...~~ ~~; "',,",<:': ~[~ "'",<:': ':l:f;'~ ~~ ~i w". -I;:;;'" ....'i&i .t':~1 ~i~~ )..~~~ ~~...i VI";: .,. ,I ~ " J i~ ~s "' ~~ .1 I , " ~ I , ! , ~: s~ , ~~ %~ ~t ~;::s <00 ~:~ ~~.. ",~l!; ~;;;t o::g~ ~~ h ~ ~~ ;::::l ~:f ~~ :;:;:: >.~ ~~ ~L~..:~ :,~.......:;':",,, ~~:~~':r* .:.-::....~;;~-g: i;:;:'i"'i!:';i.,,< ..~313"~~ i$",,,,.'!Ii';;!i ~;~~~~;: ~:~~~~~ "'ii~~"'~8 ~i5 .",l>.i~':r ~~g~~~~ li~~~~:~ s~:e~~i!:13 ~d~~~~ !i'5*a:~~ !-..... ~~"'!S~:::~ ~ "':;':~'iE~';t';t ~ ;@j;~~~ :'"'l: ,,::; .~"i;:'!S ~ ':Ii""""....'" ....... ...\t1~~~0l"- ~ "'''l!toM~:!I: V) ~~~.,,~~~ "'.... ...""...- Y'l ~;;;\5!<,~.'~ s: ,,,',.-. ~ ~~*~~~~i ':-lJ o.~~i::'::.~~\::' ~ ~b~~;:!i:~ """"00' ~ "'~~~\l:j"'l;;~ !Jj !:i CS ~ ~ ~ <::i ~Y> ""~ "C::: &; ~ is,, ~~ ~~ ",<1 C(i.. ..<5 <5,- ..,[;:i ~~ ~C( ! ~ ~ - )~ ~ ~~ ~:~ . . g i!: ~t'e i~t ~15~~ ~%~t'l ~~~~ ~~~!5 ~l:;~~ :;,::i!<:l~ ;g:; ~~!~ _.,l!iu t~lS~ ~~~~ o .. "''''<:>0, ~~~t -,,~'" >:"~'" -~"~ ,;;i~~ ~~~~ . '^ ~n~ ~~~~ >:~~'- :~~i ;::jO;~ ~~l:;g ~!I;15~ ~~~~ :;,:.."'... ~~~.. "'.. ~ ~'el';~ ~i~: ~~~t:' , " ;;l';"'" '...:::;; ~~~~ . ~il1~s:::. o ., -~15~~ 15<>."''''0. st:'~:~ "'''',,'''... "" 0 .............. "''''".... ...~...."'... , H "'''''-'-0'- '0' ~!5t<=:..::l5 ~;~~i . . , ......'-<>'" g~:J~~ ",~~:::l:; ~~~~'t' ~~~'ei;:: 'g~!::n ,,,. .00 ....."'....."'.. "'~O..<>... -'-'<>..'-' .. , ~~~~~ ~~ii:l;;~ - i~ 5~ ~,: ~~ ~~ :~ 0' '" !~ ~~ ~~ ,0 ~ ~~ ct: ~~ :'I G ~'il :---;::; :i: ~ .. ;::<.J ~~ ~ ~~ OJ ~~ '" ., Il :1 ~o ~~ ~~ !;,: " ~~ ~~ .. "' ~: 2~ ~~ :2 ~~ ~ ~~ Q:; ~~ ~ ~.. ~ ';t~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ "" -, Cl5 ~~ to ~ ~ o. ~~~ ~~~ .., '-. l!l~::: 0: ~8~ ~ ,,"''''''' <t <t."::; ~ ~~..~ ,,0;"" i1! ...",", ... ~~~~ ~ \l!S~~ ~ ~~,:~ O'u....':!i !!j ~~~a 0..,' !::l1!U;S _ . , ~"'-.. ..., ~"~8 ~, ~i:'':;", _ ~~~c ~ ;:;~~: '< ....:ill .n", ... o;,,~::'j i -'~~~ .. ~ ,.::f:~'" ~ ~:g::::\;. ~ ......... Il..<:l ~ ,~, ~ ~':i~~ <1 ~ ~ ;;<;i!:e: ~ I,.... ~i<;gl:; 1[ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ;!:~ ~ "," i . o ~ . ~~ ~~ ," ~~ ~~ it ~~ ~~ ., ~~ " ~~ "' o ~~ ~ ~a 9:: ~~ ~ q:; ~fi:~ lI) ::...;'::: ~~~ ~ i'l!~;:; i'X :.. ~ \;; ~ ~ ~ G " ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' . < ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ . . ~~ ~~ ~;:'i ~t ~~ ~~ ~~ S~ <, '. i~ .: g~ I' ., -;::::::: '" ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ .- ct: ~! ~ ~ -:;,: ~ ~:;t~ "' ...... ~f: ' ~ ~~ '" ~ ~'" ~ ~:i ",.' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ il ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ e ~ ~ u IX " ~ , " = :t , ~ M Q., 1-Z~ ~ uOgj !!551- 1:::. o " OCO~ ~~ ~~oc " ;j ~ a.ao l~"S ~ i.~ ~~ r' u , "~ "" ~o . ~ z ~ ('f) a ~ ~ LO "'- 0 ,; U ~ ('f) <iai Q a z~ w a. ~ " 0) ~t;; ~ ~w ... ~ ~ ~. Z w N ~ N 0 a ~ ~ ~ ow ~ 0 w z. ~ > 0 go: '", " "'0 (5:': "'0 ~ ~ ^S \iN a > Z ~a 0>- ~ ~~ " 15' l1l!1i z -~ " \1=> " a z' 0 0" 01i :'i I- -~ "'z :!~ >. ~ " Be 0 U ro, w , " . '" 2 ~- W N :! , <( ~z ~ 00 > 0 z, ... ~ a: ;;;0 Q row 0 ~ ~ w I- ~ . ,-~----------- I I I I I III I W I ::; , Z I I ~ I "'0- I 04: >-::< , W I >>- , !5 9i I III 0 I Z I 0::::> ~ I 00 N I u..(l) Z I 1"")0 0 I I--~ ~ I w W I W C/) I ~ cr.) I t- I <0 I ~ ~ \ 9 I (/'l I 's I I - I ill ~ ~ / I " I~ re. r I .------- b () I'ir-- r ~-:-;:;:__:-.?---=)I~v~=--]l'!;t~~ Il -' ~ ~ g~ --1- joo <'I /-- I I~." '1,1 ~-f0'" )', .at ti I a 9 filII> I I I m ~ II ~ .",1z.~ ...... '-' r--J1F [:i I - - Sl ~ l-o-liiLI~~~ 11'1 vre~ '~~.(07 /~/ ~ ~ Ig ~g~ \ I~;:~~ 1~lg;:<<> <:)11 b~;S; '-,-'::::,-,;:6" I J -'t;"! IbU&1;S;,I~:::;:J!/,J-'tilll '-'>:...\..,-<-\ \ I~' 11..J~N...lfl ~ ~~/~' ;)0'......0.>\... I I III- I- ::oIl. "",,;. ~ I- I. ,,-:- I ' L_--.j'r~:?;.~-::===-===~;j/ '" \.:-~~__ _ _ T:_~ I /(/ ----..: - OVoIJ I/:JII'I<J 'I1S3iij// ~ ~ I: - - - - - - - - - - - - -- I i~1 ^-I, ~"" I, It! /' \ :~l g~; II~ I /.'1 I \ \\\ ~:E /13 'ii I \ I'.' "J)/ I I~I I \ 1\1:- - ~ I IJ/ " ~ ~ I ltil I * ~ I I /~f ,_:;:!; ~; ~I~ 1"1 I d. 0, "("< Ilf I ~ ~ .., ~ r 0 I I;:; I I I- I I I \ I \ I , ~<> ~ ~ >-<':1",';1 ~~:S~~ ~~;~~~ s~';i""'~ "'.~::E~"" " E::s >.~:i i~:~ :~g~ ~:~~ ;;;,:;:'"i.: \;:;: ~<>~;:; ~ ~~~i5 :::i "':;:-15 !.5 ~~t;; ~ ~~:~ ~:N ~ ::;>:"~..: s <>"''' '< ~ .... ~"~'i!~ ~ -";' ~~~iE:~ ~ ~i O>~~::j~ ~~; ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~i;~~ ~ .._ il:t'~~::;>il::; t ~>.~~~~ !5~"''''ct~ 0.. """,ll!_", ~~~~~~ ::;~!C~~ "'.~~...."" ";;:":;ja ::~~i !~~~ ...."'"... ~-"'" \5~h ~ ~;~~ "'..."'... , ,- 00 , ~ ~~~~ " ~ ...~~~ . . 0 il",,,.. ,",~ , . ~;~~~ 0 ~c; ~ ,. . 0 , . ~ *~~~~ , ! ~:;! !1i " ! . ,. ~~1t~c....e: n " .- r~'~' ~ "'< .. ~ "' -, 1;, " "" <:l....e:~ , o. 0' "~i"""'''' , H \5~ - " ..,,, '<-<> i~ ~ "'...."'... ... ~ ~i ~~~~i!!fi ~ ., ~ iS~~~2iS~ . ~ ro u:i s: N ti ~ . ,. '0 C 'c '<,,"'.... '" ......".... - ,,-.. ..,......"'" ~~~~~~ ~~::~~~ ~~~';11i;'i! ~.~~~~ >.-~<>i !~~~ ~~~:.: "'''~''' ~:~~ :2~~ .::~~[S i5~",,;; ~~~~ :N '" ~ ~;@~~ ~ . _ c,'", :;;;;~15 6",~i::", t3 ~~ ~~lE~c';t~ ~ ~~ ~~;~J: ~..ct >.~i...:;:;i:: l:l:: ~~ ::12",~~:;] ~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~8 15~~~~15c ~ ~ ~ ~o; ~~ ~~ 0' -. ~~ ~ ~ 2~ " Ii " .... f- W W I C/) '" f- 9w w I C/) , . " . 0 ~o; i ! ~~ ~~ ~ "' , ~g ~ II 0' n c ~.; !:: ~~~~ ..,....."'" !5::::"''''",i:!i o..~2~~~ ~~'::1';i!.:it .............>.'" :~~~~~ t>-;;~ >.~c>i ~~;~ ~!~~ ~~~~ ;~~il "'...~'!:; ~"i!!~ ;~~~ "'~~[lj (5:5"'';; '$!~~~ N <>'" '" ~ !i! ~:r~~~ ~ J.. ~ ~:~~~ ~ ~~ ~:rlt~c.,.~ ~ ~~ li~~i~~ ~ ,,'" ;~E~~ ...... ~ls -..'" "'_<> ~ ~~ i;~;~~ ~ ~~ il~~~~(5~ , . " 0 , , , ,. ! ., . i~ , " , 0_ " ~ 11 n ~ ~ ~ ,. '0 ~..~~~~ ~~~~~~ !c~::~~~ ~~~~:O~ , c, ' ""'~:~s ..~"i ~"'~~ ~~~'-- ~"'~~ ~~~~ ~m i!:~~2i ~:5"'''; ~~~~ ~ ~ 2::2~": ~ '" <>",... '< ~ ~ 2i ~:~~~ t3 "O! l::;~ati....e: ~ !~ l~~~~i; ~" ~~i~~'" :q;"''1> ,;I::;>",,,~:;] ~ ~~ h~!:i~2 ~ ~~ iSH~~l$~ ~ ~ ~ . Ii 9 i-'" ~~ ~~ ~~ c o:~ f?~ "'~ t:i~ 'l!" "'", '"~ ~~ Q., ~ ~~ ~; "I ~ ill N "" "1m:;; ;:~~ S@<Ji II-lli ~:E , . " 0 i ~~ , ~~ ,. . -, , "' ~~ , II ~ 0' n ~ '" ~ '" $ < " ~('f) ~LO ;i~ ~(V) ~~ w ~~ sO') \i~ ~C\J ~. ~N Ow ffi 5~ . ~O ~. . - o. ~~ 0 0 ~Z 0 <~ ~~ 0 0 ~ 0 u ~~ ~f- ~z ~~ gU ~~ 0_- ~N ;<( <z UQ z~ -u tia: Ww ~~ ~f- . . rsh! ~~ ~~~ :.., ta.';';~ t'~"'i::;", :::::'5~~ ....~rs"'~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~1<'~ ~~~~ll'l i""""''''1€ ~Sl~I3~ l-,~~~ll'l ~~:"""ls ~~*~~ "'........1;3'" >:'<i",<>o:. ""~"'!;;:'"'''; ~~~g~~ "-i::-.;_@::; ;,::[;::;"" V) V)V)F~~\', ~~~.'!;~~ ~ ~~~~~~ l:S8V1!':lls~ ~ij~~f5~ ~ . ~i~~~~ ~ ~ '5 ~i3i~;" ~ ~~~'5t;~ ~ ~ ",..,,,,,~13\'J ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ : fNSIJ()t"Sy ~_ ! 'W"fJ"S'Mly'Ulll"J]SHOJ ':!2'!::l orllof/~1~/j;f#OO:~I.5~00# - - ~:~ - - -1-- - - - - - - - - - - --- ! \!;! I' ~ c , . 1 ~ 1::;<;:;::' <.; HL.-------' J ~~: o ~"1 ~~: o i!s~1 ~ ~~: .... "'-"-I' Oz ~'i.:, "'~, cJ E1~1 il; ~iiZ: vil{')~ ~I 1.&JOli!~' I-a~~, o(N \<.,1 B>- ~: Vl!1i. ~l !lQ~~~: ~~~~\ 0( ~'"ii tf) :::it, l! '~i > ., w <' o I ~ o 11"- "I~ \Is "I~ \~\ I' _ NII\;/ \ ~ M:2 \'\ ~ I 9 &! g \\\ b \ C\I\1 \'\('.10.{)-' '\. __I-<')L-jll~~ \- 0 c:i l'lbl ~ \ .... z~ IV";;!; a!p.!!-__]!)!!E__ q~ b I- 1',-.___ l~'---~":-;::--=\Ir":=---::";[!""!!~/i& ~ -' ~ 'I, ~c:! -- '.--- I , II!r.....::::-;,........ y-. I- "1 I- ~ 11<:1 I.......~ ....... J...Jj, () : ~----j'I~ ',I ""',,.1..; 1/ g ~ ! I ill ii' ',-"""",,07 /4. 9 , I '" I ''''-'/~lJ I ~' I' ",~_ 1,/ '/",,,-,,::, \' - I I_ I " " !j( ~"...., , --~H'~ ~ L ~~ / ....., :- \ \_, --"'-~--'iii.;,!;/iit=~- ------,! - ---X---"~~J~- - '" Olbr,L0'6Ir11 If OIY,!J!T601JFll1Ifdll"6(J(jOStr6tJff , ...'. ...., .OJT6/n I' FYgon"r.()t)N II~d6'6S6D ff)V96(,~3"L;.r[".00# \ ;11 ~.:::: __, ...,Ii f,OIf6f>l/1/3_or,U.ooJI') ,I I.H)'096,,:l,17.['l".tJONJ \::, r~ 1 .. 11/ 'I' \< -, - ~ ' ~~i "/~ \d g:: i~~ @ \ 1 ~ ~ ~~ ~i~ ~~~ flit \,\\ I "~~ ii ~:~ ~V)i -, \ ~ ",,,,.... "Ik \ H::jl~ :;~~ J! _J -~ V\;t- fIt : 2~i? f'f fa~~ '11., ~~.'!; /'/l:: ~~~ 11,1 ~'::1~ I 'Iii -""'. tIt ~~~ ~il::cS'" ~~:~ ~o-es~ ~~~... ;~~~ ~",,,,,,,,, ot~~~ ~~ffi~ ~~~": "''t'~~ ~....,::~ tu~lJ:;; ~til~~ ~;~~ ~, (,~i?' I i O<t;~~;;; ':::~~;;~ ~"'~"'~ "....~ i!i..,'" t~"'":2;; !o~~ t'>:it' IX ~~~~~~ ~~f;l ~~~ I.lj ~~i!.':l1~~ I..,~~ 8:.';: ~ '!l1;l~iliit'!r'! :;:~!i l~~ ~ 0 00 ;: I , ~~~ i~~8~ ""-,"~- ~.,~~~ ~~~~9i ,"...",~t: ~~il'':'l'I o ~ ~ ~~~ fill::! ~ 2il'l'I ~'&.!<t~ ~:s~ ~~~; ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ bl:;,l;:,:~ ~~lI'l 000 I ~ ~ ~~i~ ~~ ~ 'Ii ~ 8~ <!lll~" <4 '" ...;:;1:<l':l is'''::; ",,,,;:; ~ ..:.. ;:':'S~~ ~'Is..;i'i... ;:':..~!.? ~~::Jl; it'it'" ~,&~ ':e.~""~ ;;;..~~~~ .,~~~ ...o;~s ~t;~ il"~~ ~~l;~ ;:!:~~o::;; :o<li:;~l;" s;;;;>~ "':.:, ~~~:: lF~~ ~~~~~'i ~~~g ~~~~~ ~~~ ""',,11' ~........ !\.,~",,,," ""', .. .' ....t;; ",...OJ ~~t... O;~\!;~ ~<'"at~~ ~,~~ ~~':5:~~ ~::ijij ~ .1i~ t:::~.. ~;:rt"';:''' L~~" ~",'1'8~ ':it'll:; ~~!;i'" ~u~ ~i5::;~;;:.l': ~li2~ ~~~:il~ ~j~ 00 @ ~~a~ ~~~!:i ~~~;:, ..o;~::; ~.~!lO~ k2a _..l::_ f ~ S1~~! - ~\',:~ ~:~~ ~~:; ~~~~ ~ ';~g~ ~~lil .._'.~.~~ ~ ::t;;i:r ;-~;:,; -~-_.. ~ ~"'':;" ~~., ~<>,~~ <t :tal;.,;:: .....l' - .~ o 0 ~ , ~~..~~; ~H~~~ ~l~~~~ ~rs~~I): ~"':ll;:;!<'" ~~~~~~ ~1>~'5~'" o o . ~~ I" " ~~~~~'" ~~~~~~ ~l'-Oj"i!;'5 ~E~b~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ "'it'''' "'''' "'''' 1."l? ~.. 1!o<t" ~~~ ~~ ;~~ ~~~ ~a ~~; 0000 o ~ o:i N cri z o i= () w CfJu; ,.... f--' " 0") cb N ;:: '" CfJ rY s: N rY o ~" 00 '_~~ 0 'I<. ~: ~~~~~ :~~ ~~@~~ ~ l::l!i'!e..:fi:!:!I:::',QS:&!:!E!2...... :I=-,......i.>"=-:t!s;~<',..l'<[I9< i ~~!~ ~!~::~~ ~~i .<;:!....~.~.!'>::lr:-:<\I~~~s'::! ~ ;:.: ~'" ",Iii;;.: '" fl: in"';;; ii1 ~ !@i::~~~~t~~~~:t~~ ~~~~~~~E~B~~~~ ~~~~t~~~~~~~~~ ~~:-:f:J:~~~~~~:;~s o "ill"~, -)~~, ~ / 'I - ~:-. \ I , ~ .. ~ ~ \ ...... I I ~ ~~~ \.....~ I ~~e ,?i, In , I ~11SI I' ~~~' \ 'oct ! ~'~l I!::! ~~~ ~~ 1~ (-tlt~1 I :... ~ ~ t:i I V) 1 ~'~~I I 1 -.; CJ I ~ \ I~~ !Z~~:" / 8 \ I ,---- ~I , ~ a'laJ' -.J \ _ lE!lS.!!23/dIJ..L _ __._ / I 'oct , SOd'tH3 1/1 /I / ...... "..J~'t3 "'.) ~ ~i ... - -- -- -- ~ .~ ~ ~y. ~ . ..'" t:i..\ ~~,~ ~~ ",i:!~~~ ;;td:; ~~ ~t.~~l>1 "....t" I( t;- b~;;:*~ ~.~~ i:j~;;:~i ~'if~~~ ..~..\ 8 ~~' M!!l~~ ~~! ~~~~ ~~~a~ ~~i ~~~~1,) 00 ~ i:!~ "', ~,~ ~, .~ :;;1... i' " 9 !i ~ I ij:;' " ~ I ::t . ~,~ ~"- ~ !i ~I" h "I'" ! ~ " <:: ~ SJi~ !i / / / , . ~ N ~ . :r--- :..,:-. ~~ 0~ , ~t ~?; '::i ~~ ~ C ~ It. ~ ~ ~ ~ ",- ~ ~'" "0 ~~ t.:l " ~ ~ <( ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~'Lfltel9Ifd 9 ---.:c-- :;~ _~i__ ,~~ .c~ il':1i!- .. l@ pr>.uBr>. B.!l~Y_ ~~~=----=---- ~~ ,,~ , ! '< B~ ~ 8~ ~ ~~ : ~~ ~ VI ~~ i ~ ~. 0 ~ ~\!. ~ ~ ;;:~ ~ i5 -<i:: <'i ~ ~ iil " oil ~~ "' ~~ <, >^ ~3i ~~ t.~ ~Slvl "-'::"J':' VI':::! ~~~ "," <5"'<>1 .'!;t:;". . ~ 0" , ~~ q> ;:: \\; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 !:!:~ 8:::: .. ;;" ~ '" ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ o:'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'::"J ;;;~;;lj;;lj Cl Cl ~ ;;lj ;~ ;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~~s~; ~ i:t i:t ~ <:i ~ t;jVl~ t>ai ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~bI ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;::"!i~ '.;;;~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!;::~ ~"- ~tJ8 ~'j ;;; Ii! ~ 0': iQ ~ ~ ~ I ~ =~ . "0 ~ ~;~ ~ g I-!i'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ <t.., l;l Vl~15 ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ :~~ "I ;; '" ~' ~C>~ ~ ~~o;le",~Vl~~V) <> Cj," b "'... ;.>l~ ~ <> @'I' n: -' '" _3>~ "" ~ 8:;': t;; ~ ~ ':(~'" ~ i:t ~~ ~ <'i, ~@;:: b ~ ~!i ~ ~ ~ ~~g ~ 1:'j tit <'i tl <:i ~ '" @ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ,; ~ ~S; '. " ~'i' ~~ iE~ 'ti .' ,," ~~ ~~ ~1", ," ~~ .'!;;' '1'''' '" ~~. . Si .~ ~ ~ .r: .r: .r: Q;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l'i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ tt: ~ [> 0:::::::::::::::::::::: ~:~~~ ~ . . " "G~ ~~ '5~ ~. ~:3 .~ -< .~ "Ii ~~ ~~ "" ~~ b~ ~"! ." ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ !~ ~~ " ~ , , " ~ ~n~~~Sl~~ ..c:."""'iil"'lll'" ':t,P::::O;~:';3gru o . ~...... ::> "'..."'''''''.... u4~&~~~~ "-",:...r.,,f.,rr, "'"""'~-- < Z ~(V) ~LO . u ~ " (V) ~..; o z~ o. w -~ I-~I-Vl <V.J~W ~C\Ie ~ l:;: ~ '" ~o~ ~! l:i &:5 Z<o > ~ 'Z \51'- g zQ,. U QVi <il-~z " >~ ~ 150 uom~ ~ ~~ ~<( <z " ",0 o zi= >a:~t:l ~ ~ " ~1- . ~"';,.,:.."''''''' .~ ""!":........ ")., ~~;~~~@ . ~ i:;tltl ~ ~ ~ ~:;!q:lg",~~", ~~~~~~~Q~ o s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~iil~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~"'''''''''''''~_'''''''''",~",'''''''''",",_''''''",'''O~b",,,,~~..._,,,~,,,~",m'''''''''m_'''~'''''''''...'''~..._mO",,,, ._.~~~~~~P~~~~F~~~~~~F~NN'~PP~N_. ~PFF~~~~~~;'NF.N~~F~'F~F~P~ _ @~""~",",,,,o"'~"'''''''''''''''''''~"'~'''-~~'''8~~~o~~....m~o,,,~,,,,,,o'''"'-''''''~~--'''~~"'"'-~ ~~b~~~~b~t~~~tb~~~~~~~~~~",~~~:..._~~~t~~~~~~l~~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~8 "'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~2~~~~~ ~:~~~~~~~~~::S~:::::~5~9~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~!~~~!~~~~S~~~~ ;'-- - - - --;,;c",,, ,_".".00i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _---~---_ cq /1,--__ I r,~~~IIr-=;;';;-~'---::: \ ~ :: /l/~ @cn -I / ' , II -.... ,-.... },1- 'I I-:E I ~~-- 11'1 I ~~'" :-........./'-.11; ~ I ~ I i ~ "'../.o 1~l.<t ~ I )' I ~"" 7 -0. I- l- I dl t:.l I v4",,'-1;!.'" 9 ~l';t [, III A~,f ';;:..,<.....,-0)\:. ~, :.. ~~ _I ,I \''''/(11 1/t"~H (/f"..':-:::'-....~ .... I ~ I ~ ~!!l ~ ~ .!::: H~::'~~~:>>I=II!_~/_ -....,~~ _ _ +-_~ ~ -[", I~- --; / rm---~- ''''~-]----=J--- O 'II l7Vt\Y J.f)Y.1S tl73/.Al3.l11Jll, ' , I ,I ~ ---~, I 'I 'I I """~. r'- U "'I'" "~ / III ii ~n,{ <>: I ~ ~ _ ~,~ t! ~ \ I,; 1,\ '" I'" I;i id ~i~ ~ I/! \\\ :(,) I "1 " III I '" II, I '" III 11'1 II, '" N)[]..l<1,I<1.ooNJ "/lI.LO'9f9<1; ,9O'9f9<: ]n"U<:,OON ~ o ~ ~ z o ~ vi~ ~~ ~>- g!1i ~=> o~ :i~ lJl :i > ... o ~ o ~ lIi ,-,Vl Zw ->- ~o wZ ro>- "-z~ o~~ ~~>- Cf2o~ ro::;o e:::vi'z ow::J "->-0 oro Zo ",~~ >-"' wo w>- Iw tfJ> w"' w::J VlVl 9 ~ ~8 ~~ ~- /,- , I , /~:::: \ I .9 ~ \ , I 'N lTJ \ I~~ j; I Ig~ ~ I :--,~ :~I~ I ~ tt:! ~ I ~ 1"'1-::2 \ g~ B 9 J a: "'~ I \ I- ~ ( I , \ <::;:; 0 / \;::"-''' / , / ! 1 ~ '~ . !e ~ 1- ,~ ~ ~9 . \ i \ ' ~~~ ~ '" ;; - . I - - . ~ ~ / o / ~/ ~ 9 . ~ ~::: ~~-i . - '!.) il: i ~ ~ ~ b; ;;:: i_ _ __ ;;; ..... ~ <1 ~ Ii!l -~j",- ~ ~ --~-- -~; ~~i BI> BNl;!.Y___' ~.!l~\'I~~-=--_- ~ ~ ~ ..."" * ~ " ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ . . i , ~ ~ i C ~ il ~ ~ ~ ~~-- ~~ .... ~~ .', \ 0- \ ~g ~ -J ~'" ~ ~~ oj ~,. ~~ ..... - ""\ g - I '\ \'1/ ,~ "" ~~ '..........;a <:;.....!J-5 _:J~I~~~ON_ ~_ _ _:::==~-:.. _ ~__ '" $ ~ __.:!..rE3.6~ " I-. ~ :t: '" ~ '" IIwlf.or;.OON ,<;609l < Z " C"0 0 . ~ L() ~~ -< U U . d 0 C"0 z~ w o. ~ ~ Q)i=:ii < :'>w .... ~ ". ~ ~ C\J ;: w 0 cJ ..........----..... ~ u ;;: - " "6~ /''\ ~ N , w vi~ , > 0"" ~ / 'f~ ~~ 0- \ ~:i" "'0 / . Q~ ';eN ~~ 0 \ 0 Z<~ 0>- I '- " .... \ ~ I " \ z ~, 5l2i { \ " z" !?::> , . , 0 U 0" $~ , "" , :5 I-~~ o. _z \ { >. ~ " 50 \ , I u UW~ " w " - ~ \ 0- I , ~- b 0 W N \ " / ~ <CZ \ , .... ~ > ~ / . 00 ... \ / 0 a:~~ , I / > ww 0 , - / ~ ~ ~ -----... U w I- 0 ~ " F. ",,,,10 ~ ~ <0"'0,,, 0,.. ..... .. .. l;;cl~::J';;!"'ti~~~~5~~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ji "'V> "'''' ~~ "v> iIJ", ,. E <'5", v>ii; <no: Q5CJ '" is'' "'v> ,..,~ ...~ '" ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~---~~---~~~~-- ~ a ~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~ ~~~~~~~~7~~~~P~P ,!!~~g::.s;~~,::!~~~~:go2 - ~_~~""~~_~~o_~~""~ '-''->L>'''L><.><.>UL>------ '-''-''-''-''-''-' " ,9;rr;01. ~. ~::l l!j,.; ~~ )~ ~ . u> '" ~ ~ ~~ <ot;:1l:l~;1 [(J ~~ -"" :; ~~ uj .......~ "'./ ~f!:. N _ C( \ ...", ~ z :> ~ .. - O :> - ~~ -NS5~~ I- .. ~- o n:: u:i~\" UJ ~ . ~'" U) C/) 0::: 8~ t-- ~1il ,..: , ~ ~! .. 8~~ - -r;;; -~I..... /j b ~:~ f~\ f-',{,{~I-;- -=-' "'l,,~ \:.. r 3~..S.Q".; 1;- - \ \ - ",r r \ ..... ~1i5 ~~I \ 0.... ~I~. t d~s , 00. '- ~I !!J/:.,j""-' .........---- ~h~. ~~&~L.~. ~b~'" ~.~... ~~... bb~~~~.~. ~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Oq~g~qq~q~~~~, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~6~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o o ~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~t~~t~~~~~~~~~~~t~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-_~~~~p~~~~~~~~~~~~p~oP~ ~~~~~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ....ll!o. "-' 8,' &;.~". l"~. foi".. "-0' &;..:0-..... r,.,' ~~i"~& ~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~3~~~~~~:~S~~~~:S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J ., \~ ~~ ~. ~ "" a ~ " '!!.~ ~~ ~ \ \ \ \ I I I \ \ 1,,I,L6S.oo11 ,9()"9[9Z 3.I-U?OON ............- b ~~..... == > /~\ t ~b 2i I ",t'"ILo.l _ / ::J?l~~ ,'J_,/ ...~:;:/ '" .., 0- o ...J ~I <0 I-. llJ ~ '" ~ ... ~ w z ~ N w ~ 0- :.> 0 . .... w " ~ ~ ~, l;~ i;~ )I ~~ j! ~ ~. --t '=---J....... :...I-S,61-.1.,.i'_ ',{[B"9 ~ w z ~ w " 0- :.> 0 .... N N . ~ N ~ TIt3 ~~ " ::: t- o ~ (CD N '" "'"' ~ 00 '" ' N~ 00 b .... ~ b ~ " , ~ . , .. $ t; ~ , ~~ I/~"b' t ' '" I' I 8 \~ /.... ,--.... < ~C') ;;; L{) . u <t~ ... I""'r"t zlli o\,,".J 0 - wO)t=l;i I- !iw < ~. ~C\J~ lI'l. ... N W ow o 0 ~ . a~ WO~~ > ~. a:: f[;= ~ ~ oZ<iii ~ ~,.., ~ 5~ u I- ~~ <: ~~ ~ 00 ~Om~ u ~. w . 1I'l~ , N W <( <z I- 09 ~ Ze Oo:"U mW r ~ ~ ~I- . ~ 5 is ~ " vi'" 'l1~ " < ~ ~~ 15~ ~ ",il: ~': ~~ ~ "'1'1 ~ is< ~ "-,,, .,~ ...~ ~ '" 'l! '" '" ~ i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- h~h.h~~~~' .' ~~~~~~~~@~~~~~Q~~~ti~~~~~~~~~~~N~h~~~h _ ~_~~~~@~~~~~~~~@~~~~~~2~~~ 1.~...888.'." h.. . --"- ~t~m",~q~~~qq .q&q8~~~b~' - .b" h"" ~~~~~S;~~I~m~~~=~o~~~~~&a~~~aaa~_~~~~~ ~ ~__gg~~~~~~~~~~~~@8~~~~~~~'" ~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;;;;;~;:;~~:: ~o~o",~~;~~~~~~~~~t~~~~&~~P~?~~ ~ ~o"'~_"''''~o8~~~~ a~~o~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~o-'" u~~uuuuuuu~~~~~~~~~mo-"'~~ ~ . uuuuu~uOOOOO~o ,lCf9f')Z ~ t::. ,9.L5fJI z ~.., w ::;.... <0 N-' ro m ~ N L ~~ €~ ~ w Z ...~ ~ ....~ O~ -'~ ~ ci ~ ......., ~ -;, ~ ui~ ~O SN 0>- lil~ ~b 0:< ~' VI ~ > ... o 1ii o N .... o ~~ -' ~~ '-I 'll;li ~~ 't\) _ bl "6i~ - ~~...,- "' '1:11"'---- h.. 'X....____ li.J li.J_ OJ:; ,-- Cl)C5 -A,&-\~- ~18~...J ~~;>\~ /' ~I~ CI) \,=-'1;io~\ ';:.,~\<:! ~\ ~'" ~1io:O'i'l -=:0\-'~ _ ~~ <:A-~~ u~ 0"'- /" '!;:I~..... ~\ ,/ 'i"l~ , ;__-."''t-i , I ~p-- - \ I ~ ---I l -: ~', N, ~ ) ~~ \\ \ B~ / ~ , ~ / \$1 '..... ::: ,,/ ' =-\ ..... ___ ' \,6' ---- ~ pV__- ~\\\ c- \~ \ III 1'1 III \, \ III 1'1 II I 1'1 III ::; Z "'~ ~ ....u 0< -,N ~ ~ N '" '" ~:2 '" ' ~ d~ o z'" ~ >- '" ~~ go N 0\ ~~ "'''' ~~~ bON ---l Z;S; >-", ~=< r:r: >- /---- /' \ .....,~;~ I ~ ~I~ I ,MiO.6o..ON u ~I\ { ,r;:~~P -- -- \ i. ~ \ '" I !i: \ ~(~ I \ ~~ ~ I ,,~F- s tl / '..... ~I // ----..... N 0\ ~~ '" '" '" ' '" N'" >- .~ 0010 ...J;:~ 0'" <C=< r:r: >- f ~8B~;,."'8 ~~~1i:!~.':l~ , / --- ~ ~~~t\"'t''t'\'' ~Q:~~8~~8 .... ~........ ~ii'''' ~ ~~~~~~ , ~ :;'.;l:'.~ ~':g :>"pr./i!.oOll 1 ~~ ~~ \.J r,e- ~ "" ~ ';3 ~g "" ;;;~ ~I~ ~12 .... o -' ~ ~ (i I ~' 51 <, ~I 0' -I ~, 81 ~, .I~ .' 21, "'a I~ ~l I I ~~ ~I ~ g, ~I I . ij~ ~~ ::: 1. /.... .0 -' "- f..- ~ OJ:; 0) ~ 0) ,. ~ ~I I ~ ~~ ~~ 1.. 51 .... o -' ~ ~~ ~& ~ is ~ . "" + . , , ~ < z ~ ~ (Y) :3 L() . u. :a!~ o rr\ zvi w \..' J Q . ~ 0) ~~ < u~ ~ <w ~ .' ~ C\I ~N iIi OW ~ U ~ . 5~ ~05~ ~ a.~ rZ<o ~ lL~ ~ 0 o Z~ u OJ: <- I- 0~ :5 ?::~ u 00 wOrn~ ai ~..... ~ N ~ <( ~Q ~ a: ~g " ~I- . "- o o !!i ... ~ <.J ~ ui~ ~o $'" g>- ~~ o~ ~' VI ~ > '" o ~ o , ~~~~~'" /n" ~~~~g~..:~~~ ~ ;! ~~\'J\,""-,\<.I '" ~~i;:~~~~~8t~ tl~~tt~!A~~~ "'31~t;;~~~~~ ~:; ~:: ~~ ,<"...'" '" .....-J.......... ~ ~ ~ ~~ il ~ ~ ~ ~~ M'" ~ ~M -I::: bON ..J ;: ~ 0'" ~:; >- ~~~~8q~~~~~~'" ..' ~2~~~~~~~~~~~~lm~~~. ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~"'~~ "'. "'....." ",;:,j ~""~ ",,~~~~~&;~8" 8'" ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~gb9 ~ ~"'~~.....~~~~~~~~~~g~ ~ '~~101.~,. ~~..,~ i3 ~ '" '" "'...,... it> <",' , . <l1.'l:::~~dJi;;~~:::[g;"l...;"iJ,&":'" , ~~~~fu~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~ '" c...,,,,~..,~~~~t~~~ ~O"O'" , _"0" <..> '" ~",l.'l t')Q:: ~..,... t.Ju'-'oo~n:;~~~~ ..., .... o .... . ... .... o .... '" .... o .... ....--- '" 0\ ~r.f> o en or ~",M >-0;;; g z~ >-", 0:; ~ >- -----.L0'9[9" " ~~ r;:~>-- -'i'it~'<-~ ~>:: "'~~ ~~~~~~ i-.~S: :J.~r,ri!.OO!I r ~I ~~ ~ '3 -- ~ ~~ .~ -j .~ ~ o " t:! .... o .... ,i) .... o .... ~ g ~ " - " ~ .... ~ j .... 0 .... 8 J.33HS 33S ,WiD/> - , w z I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -~ _w ~ ....~ g~ ~ ~ ~ ,6O'6L" IIISf,i!OoOOl/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ I I I I 52 .... o .... 0' ,< ,~ 0' ,:~ I -,"'i5 If. st:>: I .. ~~~ I ~ i'0'l:S I ~ gir~ .oc . , 1: , ~ " . "" '- " ~ ~ ~l:l ii:~ i:i", "'It ...S? c'" i;1~ "" "'~ 15"" "-'" 2~ '" 'J! '" '" ~ i:: " . , to " '" + -ii--\ <\J \"1 i.. ~~<\J I ~r-:fj ~ -., ! ~I .... ~ I~'" I 0 ....,.,,;:! ~ f}~...J ~I :: , , , , \ \1 If f f / ,ln6i]) / f3.e:;.oz.OONJ/ / / II / / / / / I I \ \ \ , , , '.......... O'r/W JOt/iS OUldHl11f}..S/// -------- ~O o Z . / /1 / / / f.... , [ .... ~b \0 ~~ \.... ~~ " 'I , , ' ~:(-I-----~)~:-- , , \ : \# ~ 0 'f ...J / f / / .... o ...J " " " -' ~1~ t::f ~<S .... ~~ o ...J w u if. ~ Z w " b 0 " "'-.: ~~ f" ~~ ~^ 0' ~ > b :; " '" ~ ;wI ~~ .' . ~ " ~I \ ~ ~~~k.~. ~~~~~~~~~~k~~. ~~~~~~~~ ~<\J~~~~~~~~~~~q~~~gq~~~~8~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q~2~~~~~~~~~- -. " 3"H,rr.OON .~6'061. "'- u .,; ~ ~ ~ u 0; ui~ Wo <N g>- 1Il!1i ~" $~ III ~ > W o ::: o / / - I - I ~Ll{j ~ I ~~<.> I l- "I' <i:~ fEr I w w { 9i:~~ I ~~fu I >-.oZ I s~~ I cia I N I~~~ II- ~ M 19ret::: I ~ 1-__(<') I I I I I I I I I I I \ , " , a~~~b~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~t~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~b2~~~9~~~~~~ ~~~~b~~~b~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~~g~~6~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~ .... (:j 5 ~ '^", ~~ "'''' "", llJlt ~~ ~~ " "'" '" is'' ,-", '" :~ '" ~ V> ~ 00:1 Z. 1-2 ;::U g~ I- ~:~~~~~~~~~~:3~~~:~S~5~S~~~~~ ~~ ~~ \,J \ '" ..... ~ ~ CI) " > t ~l ~~ en ~ '" " "1- .... ~~ " ~, .... 0 " 0 ...J @~ ...J N\" ~ ~p ~~ :: I- o ~ N '" ",on "'''' "', N'" .1::: ON Z" '" 1-0) ~2 '" I- ~ ~Je:~ W ~ :.-"'~~....~"'i::- ~",;:::~ ~cg. m~"'1<.~;..~~@fllf!::....2!~ I ~ ",,,.;,,, 0;"'; ~:.:i<:i,,;,'rl",~..;...:ti <>10; ~~..; ",,-: ~ ~ "':2...:...;...; "'...;~ a;::! 1 ~~~~~~__~~~@~~~",~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~",~~.~' :~ I i~a~~~" ~~~~~~~~~a~a~~a~~~~~~~~~~~~!1 I ~Q~O~~~~~~~~~D~~~~D~~~".;~...;D",~D~~~...;~~~~~'\ ~~~~~8~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <:I [)lot \ i a~?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~~~~ A ~~~~~~~~~tt~~ttE~~~~i~~~r~t~~~tf~~~ ~ _~~~~~",__D~~__O-~N~-~~~NNDNN~~~O_N ~ Cl \ - '\ \ \ \ I I I I I \ I I ~' gir I I I //~-J-'\ " \ I I 6 ! I \ ~ \"1<..> I \ j ~I~ / I '- ~~...- ~ I i..... - '!?I- '" / - '" -/- - -- - ~o~~~~~D~~G~Ga~SG~GE~~~a~~~~~~o5065 1\ I ' I I I I I tiw I~~~ I-!illl I .... ~z ~~/ g~~ ~~ r ",'1: I '" lit I <:. :; " r ~ I I i-- I I I I ",, 1-' '3' I I '" I- o ~ ~ .,.Zw -1Il::i wo ....~~ O~z ...J_w ~" .0 ci ~ ~ ~g ~ '( ~G::I;;; ~~~ ~ - r~ " ~ ~ >:: '" ~ I o , ~ '" I g S I ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I : t I I ~ ~ I i ~Ill ~ I "'t::;.... ~~ ~m I "'I VII I u - "" / I , 1 -ct --' ~_I ;.,ii;tl ~~ I __"'-J I I L 133HS 33S , . ~ 13~ ~ ;~ I~ L__ I', ~ . 0 :. ~ I::: '< .6U6l' M.r:r:.?:fkOON ~ ~~ ~~ L ~ w Z O~ _ w ~ ....~ Om ...Jo ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ e~ " ~ ~ :: .... o ...J ~~~ ~"'~ -,- r~ " 0 s",S , " o , ;--''''' g ~ .,. <Xl u n~~n ....~ O~ ...J~ ~ ~ o o I~ " t ~ ~ II02"20'!WW r ~ .0' '~ . ,I ~ ql , ~ -;~ ~i ~~~ i ~&o , ~ ~ I 01 'f}:;' I I i2~1 \"1 ~~ <\i'" i!J1;;S"'''' ...J '" c:::~ 15"" .~ ~ 0 <'l ~ I--r.. :S <.,;.':@ ",I'" ~ ill ~ Z,J, 8 1 1\ ~ -,.... ~ ~I ""'" ....';:,]1 I-ti~ '" f'l~ z " VI g,.... I.... g~g:;i; rlll"'S; { , l::.... ....1 I- c:! 61g:~~ I ... I l :::. Ilci~~ 'C.^C ( ~---_z'o "": _ _::::.- _ _ _ ..:...:":'~ _ _ _ ~.rr.ooll -ltilriW O"lOl:J 19'V.1S 071U!:J3Lina 3 - - - - ~ - - ~::;:~ " ~ . . " 1m )~ \~~ .. I ~ \ ::: I I I I I I I I I I I I I \ I ,I , ~13 '" -' !l~ ~;:: .... ifJr ISll ~ I . o. ;:::~ ~f5 , ~ w Z ....~ W ....~ o~ ...J- m m ci N Lg-z;;ool'S"H ~... ! rt"S"S'MnJ'"Sna'J3SHOtJ ...,,~ U(J;9fJi?':l.!il.6~VJ _ _- '::). _ _Of II' {~~6!!!:~''!:..'':~ ...!!:-ES.oav ~,~ -, I :~ I~ ,- i~ <( R'" <.; ~(Y) ~~( ~LO~Ul .c ~~l u ~t::~ u ~ ~<(~ ",,~', ~1"V*'\>-n.5. 0 . W\"'JL...NOUN~li ~~\ ~()) 0'<1" m ';f ~ I <( "'cZvi~ !;::'e'1 ,.... O:O:.::o:Q _Z 'il!'" ~C\J 1-0(111-1- 0 ~~I W oOt....B~. ",bit ~ ~:O(ll~ ~ ~~, f5 . O-Vl;jN - I~I > OOZ ~l.O "'! -0 ZwlrOW Vto ~ 0:: OoO-t') 1.&1 ' ;:; ~~I:;l~~ ~g~ i ZOUa::a::a: ~ >- o.~wl.J...i"g>- 'Q: 'Z <( ~....~tn~ ~l =:> I..L.'~:::lOO VI::> 1:ii I o O~...JZVl il(Z '-", "-I- Zll':~Q..... 0< ~l <( ow-I- -,.~' ...J (ija.l/}lI:::o..Z ",' a >(fI(01[~ it I 'ilUa<tJ:<ZVl ~, ~ ~c:-i~QE3 ~ ~l <C (I)",~~1- > ~, :s <(~:I: laJ "ii' {')cnl- -I ~o: ZN"l g ~I !:: w'r-, > ~ ()IJ 3tI!...1S u . m~ ct ",( _-.______-: wI- o~, - ..::-..:-:::c-, '1'-- - -- - -; ~ :c ~I-"-- I L {, I ~ .r I ~ ~ ;s;;; ~I -~---j I~ I' I I ii, :1, : I 1'1 J: -~\\~ ~~~(------ -=~~1ffJliffl;__'~-" -=-=~-=---II -OfI"&lrll'!~.O,o.[".tX1II flJPf',,(, Ug6"iJI/1 UJOUXMJ I i r "Ii '" //// \\\ "'f ,/, ,,' III", "1/;, fi'l ",ii ,/, I- W W J: CJ) I- Z <C a: I- CJ) Z o U ..J ~ Z w :! z o a: :> z w ~ ~ ~ " - ~ " ~ ~ ~c ~ " ~ ~ -"" if "' ., Q~ ~ ~~ ~S1"'~'i? ~~\'s~~ ~~~~~ ~~8~~ ~~[;;b~ <,,,u~a:VI ~~~~~ ~~VI\'s\i! ~~~~~ ~;"~li:!~ "'-:t:j-'" ~~,~~ ~~~~\'s "'..,;",(j,VI "'~"'~t:;1ii ;:!15iJ::.:ia: ~E~~~~ """e' ~\'s~~ts:E ~~i'i~~~~ ~ VI <='" - ~l;;~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ \3s:::!i~",;" ~ ~';!~~~~ ~ (tj~~:l;!~~ ~ ~~~~~~ / ' / / ~>- J~~, , ~~ '- ~ ' / ':,1~ ::i N \ I ~ ~~~ \ I ~i~ ,'~> .. \ r ~~I ,~~~ --J Vl \ ~' f !,S ~"~ <~ r (..~~ I, ~ ~ ~ r " ~I~~ !Z'!"',' \ ,'lO~ ;t;; , I \ ~I '-,~-- -, :!!' ,_' ~J2E23Y~_ __~. II " SOd'IH:J II? Il,/ ", ]11ll::J )' "..... ...::::.... ~i - - - ~~ :;,'":...1 ~ ...../- ~., ";~ <~'c ~;I~~ ~ -: lil'/l<l;:: il'lt, ~ !;~~.. ; i ~ ~~i5 ~ ~~~~ ....~~" :~~..~ '" i:1;,,!!~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~bi~ ~~i: a:~S ';t~~~ ~~~ ''''~ ~i~2~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~Il ~~; ~~,,~ Vi o-,~tii!~ ~ ~ 0,,,,,,... 'b. "'"-, ;-;-=:~ 10.1 e~""O;t ...~:'; 8~5&~ "!~I,.~ l..~il: ~ti~:'; ~ ~:;S~~~li' :;s~~ ~~~li'1Q :;Slll~~ :;S~i! ~a~~ ~ & && & & & ~ ~ ~ v~ ~~a ~ '> "'0' "'::;'" ~~ ~ ~;,~~~~ ::i ~~~ ~ :01 -< -. _ -"",~ ~ "",,,,.. ~: ~ ~'O:'l's ~;~ ~ ~~S;~~ s ~~~, ~.'~~ ~~~ii! ~~~ ~~~7~", ~~~~~~ "'"' - ~o;....~ "i'i~ I;;:..::.i~~~ ~~':'Q,;;N 0,:1;",,,, ;-~~ ~~'" "'<l _I>,b___ ~,,~~~ ~>.s~::: :.. ~7 ~ ~;~!;~ l..ti~1il!i~ ~;~h ~~=:~ b:::l ~h~~~ ~~~!;~~ o 0 00 0 I '" ~. ~ ~ ~~~~ <S '" ..~~ ~ ~ "'o;~ ~~~~ ~!;~~i;jo\ ~~~~ ~~~~ ~:l:'!i ~<;si i3~~~~~ ~~o~ ;;J~~~ ~~1 -.,; ..'" t'l '" 1.>"."",,,, ~Oi~S, ~i:::~':2!;~ ~'O:'''-s, ~~o::!;~ =:~~ ,.... ..:7;...", .. ~o;<> ,",' ">.~ "'~'" ~;~~ ~1i~l':'~~ ~~~li ~:a~'l ~~!;1 :::::", '-";b~;::~ l..~!.:< l..'1i, a", ~"'o ~l~~ ~s~<~i': ~iSd~ ~~~::l~ ~j~ <9 & <9 , '; -.,- -'I' ~~":(~ ~~a~ :"151>:": ~~~~ & o <9 ~~.~ ~~ ..~~d o:;t~~~...'1 l!t.~~ii! ~lt~'li:! lI!.. t; " ti~v,'>l....; ~~~ ~~v;12i 'OI",iS!2~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ;::.::! ~\;~~~ 't:~~::;!!2 ~~i': ",~t>l.:~ && "~ ~~ L' ~~ ~~ ..l " " lSo:;:: ..~ .ill "'~.. "'~ ~i".. ~~~ ~: ~,"~ ~iS~ .;~ ~ '" l..g~ ~2 ""~~ ~a:::! c:iS ~;;:12 0000 ::r! cO Nu:) z:;: QN tlti t.U , CJ)CJ) r- f--' i>! ;;; " s j ,. ~~ :r;:: g: ;J; ~ ~ ~2 ~ S, :;: .; ~ k !5~ ~ ~ :;: ~ ~ ill ~~ ~3 i>! Ie ~ Ie ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,~ <b 0 U 0 0 0 ~~ i2~;g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ g;~s ~~ ~ il;' :J! :J! ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~~ Vl~ [3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~::5~ ~g; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~; 0: [<! ~ if ~ ~ i>' ~ ~ 0: o " ~ <:> <:> <:> ~~ ~ ~~ :~~ ;:~~~ ~ ~:>'11'..(!!lg~~tt:~&'~"..., ...-,......,..,..(!!'"'&;:-:-:-::t!st; ~~~~~~~~;:j~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ . . ~ ~. <o~ ~ ~" . ~; , tJ!€ ~ ". ~~ > ~ ~~ 1E ;;!l: k:\5 ~ 111 ;;:~ i:l ~ "'i:: ~ ~ '<5'" Oi ~ ~;:: "" . gO <' f,!D ., " ~~ ", >. ~3 ;::~ ~~....; ~~6 ~~~ ~~~ ~ , 13 ~~ '" .. :g "b -. .' o' -. w ~~ i~ " . , " ~ c ~ ~ ~ . . . . . . < . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i Iii ~~~~~~~~~~~~~t ~;;.,:...:...~~~:...:...:...:...;;.,"'''' ~~~~iii~~~~~~~ ~:;~"J~'::~'::;~~~~:;:: t> ~ 0:::::::::::::: . . , , ~ \ ~ \ t~p m:\ - ~ il: '" / / / / . ~ , ~ " . . r~- ~~ ~ ~;:j ~~ ~, ~~ t! '<i~ ~ ~~ i; ~ =]1== ~I t5 0: hi ~ ~ t: ~~ ~ ~~ I~ ~ ~~ '-<I: "''u :::8 ~ ;2 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ..., <1;:;' F~ ~~ "'~i ~:;; ~~ ~t::", o,~ ",S ~~~ 2 ~ ~(;l~ ~~ r ;)~'" ~~ ",,, ~~~ ,,~ :l:_'. "ti ~~ ~" ~-i,'! i!;'.:J "'~ ...[5... ",<'\ 1;:1;>: lJ!t::~ 'u!j! ~" ">'l:>: ~"::l il'iS 1i~o:'~ ~~~t;~ ~i~"'i' i=~'u {~" a ~o:'~ -~ i ~~~ ~~1S;\i' :::e<l:~ ~~~ ~~... ~ls~ ~li~ ~8 ~ ~~t>; ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~; ~~';I ~~ ~ ~'u~ ;~~ ~~ i ~~~ :\~~ h 0:' ~~~ lili;i~:~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ . '" oi.. 8S-LS'Lll(JJftJ ,~~ ~~~ NC~O p/l.UB!Y~~~-_. ~~-:.:-::-=- ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~l<J ~ ~~ ~ ~;~ i Sj ,\I!", ~ ~ ~ ~!i~ ~ ;;; aJ~ ~ ~::l15... "'-..... _ "'Oi....;;;; ~ ",;; ~ ~ L ~~~ g; >-->--"l<:>",,,,ilj/::t3 ~ ~; ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~!;,i5S!~~~ 8 ~~RJ~~'~~;:: tJtJ~::JI:]~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~:::~~~:;"'ii:!i ~ ^' ~a' ".... .:o:j ~ ~ ITEM NO.7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager V /J1l ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Wolf Creek Fire Station, and Approval of the Professional Service Agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. for Construction Management, Material Testing and Special Inspections - Project No. PW01-11 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer Mayra De La Torre, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Wolf Creek Fire Station, Project No. PW01-11. 2. Approve the Agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. to provide professional construction management, material testing and special inspection services in an amount not to exceed $319,460 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 3. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the contingency amount of $31,946.00, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. BACKGROUND: The Wolf Creek Fire Station project will provide for construction of a three bay heavy urban station on a 1.5 acre site located at the intersection of Wolf Valley Road and Wolf Creek Drive South. More specifically, the project will include construction of the following: wet and dry utilities, precise grading, site drainage systems, erosion control, foundation systems, a new single story fire station totaling approximately 9,062 square feet, a storage structure totaling approximately 576 square feet, trash enclosure, 2 above ground fuel tanks (1 ,000 gallons each), site walkways and hardscape improvements, site landscaping, site concrete masonry unit walls and a parking lot. In addition, the project will provide for procurement and installation of certain furnishings and fixtures necessary to support the fire station. The Construction Plans and Specifications have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for bids. All Contract Documents are available for review in the Department of Public Works. The Architect's Construction Estimate for the project is $3,500,000. Because of the size and complexity of the project, it requires material testing, special inspection and a full time construction manager with recent proven experience in the construction of specialized building projects like the Fire Station. Therefore, the Public Works Department requested proposals from three (3) different firms with extensive experience in construction management of specialized building projects. All three (3) firms responded to the proposal and one of the firms is currently performing similar work for the City. Staff rated Vanir Construction Management, Inc. as the firm providing the most qualified and cost effective proposal. Vanir Construction Management, Inc. (Vanir) has extensive experience with similar projects; they are currently construction managers on the Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station. Perthe attached agreement, they will provide all the construction management, material testing and special inspection services described in the Scope of Work, as shown in Exhibit "A". Vanir's cost proposal is based on the estimated construction duration of thirteen months and breaks down as flows: Total: $ 2,125 $ 4,250 $ 4,250 $ 258,835 $ 45,000 $ 5.000 $ 319,460 Task 1 - Project Validation Task 2 - Construction Management Plan Task 3 - Project Procedures Manual Task 4 - Construction Administration Task 5 - Material Testing & Soils Testing Services Reimbursables FISCAL IMPACT: The Wolf Creek Fire Station Project, Project No. PW01-11, is funded by the Wolf Creek Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 03-03, the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Fire Mitigation, Fire facility, Public Facility and Public Service and other reimbursements from the Developer (i.e., Standard Pacific Homes) and TASIN. The total cost of the original Agreement $319,460, plus a 10% contingency amount of $31 ,946.00, brings the total authorization to $351 ,406. Adequate funds are available in Project Account No. 210- 165-733-5805. ATTACHMENTS: 1. CIP Project Description 2. Location Map 3. Agreement with Vanir Construction Management, Inc. ~ t:: !l... B ~ ~ t ~ .€I::: ll..; " .... ;t:: E-< 1j " 0.- .0 ... ~ .... ~ o i;l ~ >"I E-< .... 00 ~ >"I gj U e5 o ~ z o .... E-< is 00 ~ ~ " 2 ~ 00 <1 o " "Cl g ".~ .... 00 B.::J E ~. @ 'S 4::0"' ..s~ Q; = o E-<'P .... p.. " os:: .Q.i U E ~ A<A ;:j " S p. o - " > " o -'" " " .... U "-< "0 ~ ] ~ "-< o "<t '" " a gp .~ - P. <1 :E ~ 'r;; <1 .S ., ~ 00 " .!:l ~ >> ~ u '" - - . - o ~ >>-< '" '" <-: V) '0 - o - N ci Z d o '.g ~ 00 " J:l '" "-< o <1 .S ~ " E ~ 00 <1 <1 " 0 s . " ~ ] p. '" 13 g; d) "@' .!:l " ~ "Cl >> . ~ <1 S .g o "ti.l U 'S " 0< "Cl " "ti.l ('j .... " ~ .s fg .::J 00 .E 8 " "E .S " ;:::j CI) .~ ..~ t) ~ " o '8' u >>-< ~ o " ~ I ij " ...0' = ~ ,,~ ~'S ~ ~ iQ,} 0 Aa3 ~ u ] ~ "-< o <1 o "-E. o ~ 00 '" " ..cl " o 00 " -B o ~ " rg o 00 " .... " " g ~ " ] <1 .S ~ " " ~ 8 o _N -N 'r;; ...f" ~...... o ....-l " 8 >>-<.... ... '" o U t: " '0' ... S~ :~ -; ~ 'S ~E-< ...f" o 00 ~ ~ 0\... = C::1 ("r) SA C,.l <.B " o .... E-<~ .... Q. '" S o 0 Uu 0000 COON 000("'11 0'" 0'" o.....q-... OONV') NlIlN '" 00 00 0 - V) '" ....... '0 '" o "<to &:I- €A- €A- f:I'7. €A- &'7 <:> .... , '" <:> <:> M '" <:> , 00 <:> <:> M 00 <:> , ...... <:> <:> M ...... <:> . \C <:> <:> M o o \Co <96 on 0 <:> N <:> M o o o o o "'- '" 00 ON o <'"l 0'" ~^ N <rl N 00 00 0 .- <rl <'"l~ "'''' o "<to -€A €A- fA- &'7 &:1 €A- o "<t ...... ,.... '" - .... .... b1l .S E <1 P. .~ tT .g B g i -~ .,..(.;.-.( (L tAut> \;5 :a ~ E 51 ~ '" ~ .~ ~.~ ~ ~ <88Qii::~ r:- 00 0 0 O\'<;;f'OM O\l/")OC'fl 0"' NO'> 0'" ('f1 O'\.q-oV) Nt-...t-'<:t - <rl o N ....... 0\ - 000 O"<tN O-N o"'O'<:::t"' <rl"<t...... "'"<t- "<to €A-fA-GA-fA-€I7€17€A-fA- o N ...... -.D <'"l - '" E o B ~.o,,:r: o,g >. ~ ~ .~ C) bo'~ C) '0 ,,~ ~ 00-4 ~ (,p.( ttI 0 .... g.- ~ C/J ctI ::@ w 0 " " >>-< ~B~~~]'z ii:~t)A-4P-l"'O~ , '1::" g < ..Q~~t)~~r/jE-t Cd Cl) Q) i:S Cl) ll) I ~~~CI)~~~~ ~~g.~gg.s-B ]' ]'] ]' j ~ ~ .. o <1 ~ ~ ~ ~ E E .S o ; " .0 " " " " "Cl 6 a [.@ [ [ ~ ~ & ~.Q..9E..8.E..o..o ~ ~ E ~ ~ .EJ .g s <1)Q) 0 v (\) .<1) (1) 0 ....OOUOO~~E-< .... '" .... '" o '" U'1:l :is g cI/lf:: o 0 " .. ... C,.l ~ g ~.oo '0 '" 00 "Cl " " " ~ ~ U - - :Ii " <1 " 8 U >> ..0 "Cl " l3 "S .w ~ " ..0 ?i- s 00 " g ~ ~ o i> ~ ~ .... lZl :.:: ~ .~ u i z ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ u C '-l t; ~ <:) ~ Ql :E Eo< .... " '" .~ o ... i>-< z~ V) '"' ( AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES WOLF CREEK FIRE STATION PROJECT NO. PW01-11 THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 25, 2006, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Vanir Construction Management, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on April 25, 2006, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein a re completed, but in no event I ater than December 31, 2006, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations' Internet web site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub-contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuantto the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 5. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the scope of work to be performed, payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Three Hundred Nineteen Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Dollars and No Cents ($319,460.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. . R:ICIPIProjeclsIPW01-11IAgreemenlslVanir Contract b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by th~ City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. . The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4. 7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after' the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 2 R:ICIPIProjectsIPW01-11\AgreementsIVanir Contract 8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi- fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of a II work, data, documents, proceedings a nd activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. (2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non-owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Ifthe Consultant has no employees while performing, under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 3 R:\CIPIProjects\PW01-11 IAgreementslVanir Contract (4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written 0 nap olicy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1 ,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1 ,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occLipied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4 R:ICIPIProjeclsIPW01-11 IAgreemenlslVanir Contract (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Acceotabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coveraqe. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms prOVided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, I etters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories 0 r other 5 R:ICIPIProjectsIPW01-11IAgreementsIVanir Contract information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing orsimilar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of T emecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: Vanir Construction Management, Inc. 290 North D Street, Suite 900 San Bernardino, California 92401 Attention: David R. Anderson, Vice President 15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree thatthe laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the 6 R:ICIPIProjeclsIPW01-11IAgreemenlsIVanir Contract other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City ofT emecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. 7 R:ICIPIProjectsIPW01-11IAgreementsIVanlr Contract IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Vanir Construction Management, Inc. 290 North "0" Street, Suite 900 San Bernardino, CA 92401 Mansour Aliabadi, President Alex Leon, CFO (Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations) 8 R:\CIPIProjects\PW01-11\AgreementslVanir Contract EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES WOLF CREEK FIRE STATION PROJECT NO. PW01.11 9 R:ICIPIProjectsIPW01-11\AgreementsIVanir Contract 9~; ......"""-' - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. INC. EXHIBIT A (Revised) Task to be Performed 290 North D Street, Suite 900 San Bernardino, CA 92401 TEL 909 384-1785 FAX 909 381-7534 March 30, 2006 Ms. Mayra De La Torre, PE Associate Engineer - Capital Projects Department of Public Works City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Proposal for Construction Management Services Wolf Creek Fire Station PWOl-ll Dear Ms. De La Torre: Vanir Construction Management, Inc. (VCM) is pleased to submit to you our proposal for construction management services based on our recent telephone conversation. During that conversation you indicated that bid phase services would not be required ofVCM and expressed a desire for us to provide material & special inspection as required by the plans and specifications. It is also our understanding that code compliance inspection would be provided by the City building official(s). Following is our proposal based on the above directions: Construction Phase Services: Task 1 - Proiect Validation VCM will verify public utility coordination (i.e. water, gas, sewer, power etc.) and agency permitting to assure that the project is ready to start construction and be supported as required by utility purveyors and public agencies. Task 2 - Construction Manal!:ement Plan VCM will provide a customized construction management plan in coordination with the City and the architect and other team members. The CMP will provide the city, contractor, subcontractors, architect and their consultants, inspectors and testing labs with detailed information concerning the specific Bellevue Denver Houston . San Diego Sacramento Las Vegas San Francisco Los Angeles San Jose Oakland San Bernardino Richmond San Luis Obispo Tempe Tucson Ms. Mayra De La Torre Exhibit A - Tasks To Be Performed Wolf Creek Fire Station Page 2 of 3 requirements, communications and procedures that will be implemented during construction ofthe fire station. The construction management plan is intended to supplement the contract documents and does not replace or delete the contract obligations or requirements. Task 3 - Proiect Procedures Manual VCM will provide a project procedures manual that will describe the process to be followed in controlling specific requirements outlined in the CMP. System procedures will be addressed for monitoring and controlling project costs, quality assurance, maintenance of the project schedule, method and procedures for payments, change orders, submittals, correspondence, reports, meetings, forms to be used, project acceptance and closeout procedures to name a few. Task 4 - Construction Administration Vanir will provide construction contract management administration as an agent of and representative of the City and will establish and implement coordination procedures between the City, the architect and contractor. Our fee proposal (Exhibit B) for construction administration is structured so that Vanir will be present on the jobsite whenever the contractor is working on the jobsite. Following is a listing oftasks to be performed: Construction Phase Review Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents Verify Public Utility Coordination Verify Agency Permits Photo Documentation of Existing Site Prepare Construction Management Plan (CMP) Issue Approved CMP Prepare Project Procedures Manual Pre-Construction Schedule Meeting Pre-Construction Meeting Review Contractor's SWPPP Review Contractor's Traffic Control Plan Review Contractor's Safety Plan Review Contractor's Submittal Schedule for Completeness Review Contractor's Project Schedule of Values Assist Contractor with Required Permits Assure Posting of Prevailing Wages Review Certified Payrolls for Rate Conformance Review and Monitor Contractors Weekly and Monthly Construction Schedule Prepare Monthly Report Review Contractor's RFIs Review AlE Response to Contractor RFls Ms. Mayra De La Torre Exhibit A - Tasks To Be Performed W oIf Creek Fire Station Page 3 of 3 Construction Phase( continued) Review Submittals for Completeness Post As- Builts Conduct Weekly Progress Meeting Prepare/Distribute Weekly Progress Meeting Minutes Review Contractor's Payment Requests Process Project-related Invoices Review Contractor's Change Order Requests Prepare Daily Log Coordinate Start-up Activities Coordinate Final Punchlist Coordinate Final Inspections with Agency Personnel Post-Construction Phase Obtain Required Close-Out Submittals Draft Notice of Completion Request Publication of Notice of Completion Process Contractor's Final Payment Request Prepare/Distribute Final Project Cost Report Task 5 - Code Compliance Inspections / Material & Soils Testinl!: Services Vanir will also provide, by subcontract, special deputy inspections called for in the plans and specifications as well as material and soils testing services for the Wolf Creek Fire Station project. It should be noted that the costs of these services are highly dependent upon the contractors approved construction schedule. Since the approved construction schedule is not available for review we have based our fees for these services on an estimate of the construction schedule and our collective past experience with similar projects. Consequently, this part of our fee proposal may be subject to revision upon receipt ofthe contractor's proposed schedule. We look forward to working with you on this important City project. If you need any clarification of the tasks described above please do not hesitate to call. Best regards, David R. Anderson, AlA, CCM, LEEDTMAP Vice President! Area Manager San Bernardino Area Office EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 10 R:ICIPIProjeclsIPW01-11IAgreemenlsIVanir Contract !~j CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT. INc. EXHIBIT B (Revised) Fee & Payment Rate Schedule 290 North D Street, Suite 900 San Bernardino, CA 92401 TEL 909384-1785 FAX 909 381-7534 March 30, 2006 Ms. Mayra De La Torre Associate Engineer - Capital Proj ects Department of Public Works City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Proposal for Construction Management Services Wolf Creek Fire Station Dear Ms. De La Torre, Based on Exhibit "A", Tasks to be Performed (copy enclosed), we propose a Time and Material Not-To-Exceed Fee of$319,460. Our fee will be billed according to the following division of tasks: Tasks Fees Task 1 - Project Validation $ 2,125 Task 2 - Construction Management Plan $ 4,250 Task 3 - Project Procedures Manual $ 4,250 Task4 - Construction Administration $258,835 Task 5 - Material & Soils Testing Services $ 45,000 Reimbursables (Fed-Ex, Blueprints, Photo's etc.) NTE Allowance: $ 5.000 Total Not-To-Exceed Fee: $319,460. Bellevue Denver Houston San Diego Sacramento Las Vegas San Francisco Los Angeles San Jose Oakland San Bernardino Richmond San Luis Obispo Tempe Tucson Ms. Mayra De La Torre Exhibit B - Fee & Payment Rate Schedule Wolf Creek Fire Station Page 2 of2 Fees will be invoiced monthly, based on time and material for each task, plus any reimbursable expenses. We have read the City's Standard Consultant Services Agreement attached to RFP No.142 and agree to the terms therein. If Extra Services are required, and approved by the City of Temecula, the following rates would apply: Classification Principal in Charge / Project Director Senior Project Manager Senior Construction Manager Project Manager Construction Manager Constructability Reviewer Estimator Scheduler Assistant Project Manager Assistant Construction Manager Field Engineer Field Coordinator Project Coordinator Clerical/Doc.Control Rate / Hour $ 135 .~ $ 125 ,:;r .$12Sfll.;1.D $ 120 $120 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 95 $ 95 $ 85 $ 80 $ 80 $ 75 Consultants Reimbursables (Fed-Ex, Blueprints, Photo's etc.) Cost x I.l 0 Cost x I.lO Please call me if you have any questions or need clarifications. We look forward to working with you and other city staff on this exciting project! Best regards, 0-' David R. Anderson, AIA, CCM, LEEDTMAP Vice President! Area Manager San Bernardino Area Office Page 2 of2 CI.) - ::::J "C CI.) .s::: o C/) CI.) CI.) u. - tn t: if as - C/) ..... t: o +:i o CI.)~ ~^ .. v, ~ ~ ,. ;,~, ~4~;_ I Jl;;.'. 111 ~. ~ ' Po "ftiil ~m f#i~ or- ~. ~<;\ ,~~ -~~ 1'-' /~;;;i ~ , ~ i" ~~ ~t !ii!..' WF ~] I @;;: ~~ $i~ I ~ ;;; "E . '" .. c ~ '6 e >- ~ o ~ ~ " "" . .. ;; o t I . . II 3:1 . E E , <n . "5 ~ . ~ u <n . . ~ .. c . n: . c . " c ~ u 2 . c o " . " . E , u o o o " "' ~ m c o ~ . . . "' c ~ 'E ",0 ~"' ",>- u;M 88 ~15 "'<n 09,<;;1 eioei en,.,"" " .< ~ Qqqqqq Zga~s:~ ~ t:t ~ " . W . ~ OOO~lI'lll'l <I'lNl()O)a> 0> ....W<lt"'.... "' 0" ~< ~. W -909:0PO ooo,cicio 000000 g!gd~dr8 ~ ! ~o ~ . W ~ Z ~o ~ ~ . W c . ~ i c . o " ~ o 0:>0 CO 00 ~ . W Jl ~o ~ ~ . W ~ " < < ~ m ~o ~ ~ .. ~ c , ~ . ~ < . ~ . . o ~--~if ~~ . w :i:::::'" . W o "' >- i: '" ~ , "' t; . "e- o. g o >- . .; "' o ~ N ;; I ~i J~ ~ , ~ 0<::10.0 odcid "".ffltlOW " ~< . ~qo.qqq z8s:g~g N ~ ~ ~ "' "' "' ) u . ~ ~ ~ 0001010'" lItNlI'lO>O>OI _en"""""" "' i:i ~ . 0.000'0 :00:000 000000 pj~cia:ic;:jo:i . w > . z ~ ~ " o ~ . w . ~ ~ . w , < ~ . w 'l ~ . w . . . . . u c , ~ t;-.: < o ~ ~ -",:: ~:.. . ~ ~o ~ ~ 1>:- <... < c . II o ~ " , . c . o ~ . ~ ~; !b o Iii o ~ m " 888g dgga w:oo~ c:nllicti.n <o....~.... N "'~ "' "' . . ~ , ~ s;~.:.i ~:g'~~ ~tl~ ~5W -..'fit-" lr !Z . . Office Locations Orange Counly CDrporate Branch: 2992 E. La Palma Avenue Suite A Anaheim. CA 92806 Tel: 714.632.2999 Fax: 714.632.2974 Los Angeles Ventura County 13010 San Fernando Road Unit 1 Sylmar. CA 91342 Tel: 818.833.8100 Fax: 818.833.0085 San Diego Imperial Counly 7313 Carroll Road Suite G San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: 858.537.3999 Fax: 858.537.3990 Inland Empire 14320 Elsworth Street Suite C101 Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Tel: 951.653.4999 Fax: 951.653.4666 Central Dispatch 800.491.2990 www.mtglinc.com e@~w Vanir Construction Management 32131 South Loop Road Temecula, CA 92591 Attn: Mr. Larry E. Campbell Geotechnical Engineering Construction Inspection Materials Testing Environmental March 17, 2006 Proposal Log No, P-06-170 RE: PROPOSAL FOR MATERIAL TESTING AND SPECIAL DEPUTY INSPECTION Wolf Creek Fire Station 32211 Wolf Valley Road Temecula, California Dear Mr. Campbell: Enclosed please find my card, our Estimated Hourly Breakdown, Prevailing Wage Fee Schedule dated January 1. 2006, and our General Conditions. We propose on this project with the rates set forth in the attached schedule. The rates have been discounted as detailed in the attached proposal. Our estimated fees of $40,816.00, have been based on a review of the plans, specifications, the billed to date of Roripaugh Fire Station and the minimum requirements of the structural program. Estimates shown are based on work performed eight hours per day, Monday through Friday. All invoicing would be in accordance with the attached Estimated Hourly Breakdown, Basis of Charges and General Conditions. These prices will remain in effect for one year from the date of this proposal. , The opportunity of submitting this proposal is sincerely appreciated. If it meets with your approval, please indicate your acceptance by signing and returning the enclosed copy. We look forward to working with you on this project. ~ Encl,: 2006 Prevailing Wage Schedule of Fees General Conditions Estimated Breakdown CLIENT: Vanir Construction Manaqement BY: TITLE: DATE: RECEIVED MAR 2 OZ006 BY: . ESTIMATED HOURLY BREAKDOWN Wolf Creek Fire Station Proposal No. 06-170 GEOTECHNICAL Geotechical Provide tesllng and observation services for site earthwork, wall backfill, foundation observation and subgrade preparation. All testing will be conducted in accordance with the the original soils report, CBC Chapter 18, plans and specifications. All field observations will be done by a qualified soil echnicians overseen by a Realstered Geotechnical Enalneer. ~ Earthwork . Staff Engineer - Bottom of Footing Check . Soli Technician - Grading . Soil Technician - Backfill . Soil Technician - Grab Sample from Import Site Assuming one import site. . Soil Technician - As Needed Compaction Testing . Nuclear Density GaugelMobile Field Lab ~ Laboratory Testing: . Maximum Density D1557 A . Sand Equivalent . Expansion Index . Sieve Analysis Quantity 4 hours 80 hou rs 24 hours 4 hou rs 24 hours 16 day Rate 120.00 57.00 57.00 57.00 57.00 50.00 3 each 140.00 2 each 65.00 2 each 90.00 2 each 40.00 Geotechnical Subtotal: CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT and CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE Page 1 of 2 Total $480.00 $4,560.00 $1,368.00 $228.00 $1,368.00 $800.00 $420.00 $130.00 $180.00 $80.00 $9,614.00 Concrete Reinforcement and Cast-in-Place Concrete Provide special inspection and testing services in accordance with 2001 CBC Chapter 19. Provide continuous inspection of jobslte all structural concrete >2500 psi. Provide a check of reinforcing steel placement prior to concrete placement for all structural concete > 2500 psi. Perform slump tests and prepare one set of four compressive strength specimens for each 150-cubic yards of concrete. ~ Preconstruction Review . Mix Design Review ~ Field Services: . ICBO Concete Inspector ~ Laboratory Testing: . Concrete Compressive Strength Cylinders wi p/u Quantity 1 each 72 hours Rate 150.00 57.00 44 each 22.00 Concrete Subtotal: Total $150.00 $4,104.00 $968.00 $5,222.00 CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT Concrete Masonry Unit: Provide special inspection and testing services in accordance with CBC Chapter 21. Provide continuous masonry inspection. Sample and test one set of five pre-construction prisms and one set of three prisms for each 5000 square feet of wall throughout the course of construction. Sample and test Mortar samples each day of construction for the first three days and once a week there after. C:::Imnl,:::li ::ann t&lc:t r.:l"r\llt c:::lmnlj:lC: fnr I=lo::arh t:;rnllt nl::ar.om,::r.nt ~ Field Services: . Placement Inspection ;. Laboratory Testing: . Compressive Strength - Grout wi pick up . Compressive Strength - Mortar wi pick up . Compressive Strength - Prisms wi pick up Quantity Rate 164 hours 57.00 18 each 22.00 27 each 22.00 8 each 150.00 Concrete Masonry Unit Subtotal: Total $9,348.00 $396.00 $594.00 $1,200.00 $11,538.00 A ESTIMATED HOURLY BREAKDOWN Wolf Creek Fire Station Proposal No. 06-170 FABRICATION SHOP INSPECTION (LOCAL-ONLY) Page 2 of 2 Fabrication Shop Welding: Review steel mill certificates, welder certifications and weld procedures specifications (WPS's) for compliance the project plans, specifications, CBC Chapter 22, and AWS and ASNT Structural Steel Welding Code. Periodically monitor amperage and voltage of welding equipment and verify that welders are following the prescribed weld procedures and sequence. Provide non destructive examination and welder qualifications per project specifications. Visually Inspect all welds and test all full penetration welded connecllons and splices by ultrasonic method. Steel Inspectors will be certified by AWS. Estimate aoolies to local (within 50 mile radius) fabrication shoos onlv. )> Field 5elVices: . Visual Inspection (Steel Fab Shop) . Ultrasonic Testing Quantity Rate 88 hours 57.00 16 hours 70.00 Fabrication Welding Subtotal: FIELD WELDING Total $5,016.00 $1,120.00 $6,136.00 Field Welding: Review steel mill certificates, welder certifications and weld procedures specifications (WPS's) for compliance with the project plans, specifications, CBC Chapter 22, and AWS and A5NT Structural Steel Welding Code. Periodically monitor amperage and voltage of welding equipment and verify that welders are following the prescribed weld procedures and sequence. Provide non destructive examination and welder qualifications per project specifications. Visually inspect all welds and test all full penetration welded connections and splices by ultrasonic method. Steel Inspectors will be certified by the AWS. )> Field SelVices: . Visual Inspection . Ultrasonic Testing Quantity Rate 88 hours 57.00 8 hours 70.00 Field Welding Subtotal: FINAL REPORTING I PROJECT SET UP )> Administrative I Reporting . Registered Engineer . Registered Geotechnical Engineer . Project Management . Report Distribution I Clerical . Final Affidavid (One per permit) . Project Set Up Quantity Rate 6 hours 90.00 6 hours 120.00 6 hours 70.00 6 hours 50.00 1 each 500.00 1 each 250.00 Administrative Subtotal: PROJECT TOTAL )> Project Total: . Geotechnical . Concrete Reinforcement, Cast-in-place Concrete . Concrete Masonry Unit . Fabrication Shop Welding . Field Welding . Administrative I Reporting GRAND TOTAL: Estimate was based on a review of the pians, specifications and the Roripaugh Are Station. Proposed rate is refiective of prevaiiing wage stancfaros. See attached Basis of Charges and Terms and Conditions. Total $5,016.00 $560.00 $5,576.00 Total $540.00 $720.00 $420.00 $300.00 $500.00 $250.00 $2,730.00 $9,614.00 $5,222.00 $11,538.00 $6,136.00 $5,576.00 $2,730.00 $40,816.00 Corporate Office: 2992 E. La Palma Ave., Suite A, Anaheim, CA 92606 Orange County Tel: (714) 632-2999 Fax: (714) 632-2974 Branch Offices: Los Angeles I Ventura San Diego I Imperial Inland Empire 13010 San Fernando Road, Unit 1 Sylmar, CA 91342 Tel: (616) 633-6100 Fax: (618) 833-0085 7313 Carroll Road, Suite G, San Diego, CA 92121 Tel: (858) 537-3999 Fax: (858) 537-3990 14320 Elsworth Sl. Suite C101, Moreno Valley, CA 92553 Tel: (951) 653-4999 Fax: (951) 653-4666 PREVAILING WAGE SCHEDULE OF FEES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2006 MTGL, Inc. is a woman-owned, minority-business-enterprise. Our facilities have been structured and professionally staffed to provide our clients with comprehensive services in the field of Construction Inspection and Testing, Geotechnical Engineering, Engineering Geology, and Environmental Services. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING Planning and feasibility studies, preliminary and final design, grading and foundation plan reviews, observation, testing, verification and engineering consultation during construction. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION Field inspection by registered deputy inspectors. ROOFING INSPECTION Field inspection by qualified technicians. ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS Evaluation of existing and damaged structures. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT Design, failure investigations, remedial measures. CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING Materials, specifications, quality assurance, expert testimony. PHYSICAL TESTING Construction materials, structural systems. NON-DESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION Ultrasonic, magnetic particle, dye penetrant. RESEARCH Product and process development, reliability testing. ENVIRONMENTAL [INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Asbestos & lead-paint based consultation, project design, monitoring & management, remediation planning environmental site assessments, thermographic imaging, indoor air quality testing, mold screening & consultation, water intrusion & investigation. Prevailing WageSchedule of Fees CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Principal Engin.er / G.oiogist ............................$ 150.00 P.r Hour R.gistered Civil Engin..r / G.ologist.................$ 120.00 Per Hour Staff Engin..r / G.o[ogist ..................................$ 90.00 Per Hour Insp.ction / Laboratory Sup.rvisor.....................$ 90.00 Per Hour proj.ct Manag.r.................................................$ 90.00 P.r Hour Draftsp.rson ......................................................$ 70.00 Per Hour Word Processing................................................$ 50.00 Per Hour Review of files for processing affidavits and certifications required by various Governmental Agencies........,........................$ 90.00 Per Hour Legal Consultation, Expert Witness and Court Appearances (Minimum 4 Hours) ,........$ 250.00 P.r Hour ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES C.rtified Asbestos Consultant............................$ 85.00 P.r Hour Certified Asb.stos Inspector ..............................$ 65.00 Per Hour Certified Asb.stos proj.ct Manag.r ...................$ 75.00 Per Hour C.rtifi.d Asb.stos proj.ct D.slgn.r...................$ 75.00 P.r Hour Certified Site Surveillance Technician ................$ 65.00 Per Hour On-Sit. 582 C.rtifi.d Microscopist.....................$ 65.00 P.r Hour Certified Lead Inspector / Assessor....................$ 65.00 Per Hour Certified Lead Project Monitor............................$ 65.00 Per Hour Certified Industrial Hygienist...............................$ 180.00 Per Hour Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 1)..........$ 95.00 Per Hour Environmental Site Assessment (Phase 11).........$ 95.00 Per Hour Industrial Hygienist.............................................$ 100.00 Per Hour (Prices based on 2 Hour Minimum & Test Samples Additional) PROJECT SERVICES Pile Driving I Deep Foundation Inspection..........$ Special Inspection ...... .... ............ ........... ... .......... $ Roofing Technician ............................................$ Batch Plant (Concrete or Asphait) ......................$ Technician - Laboratory and Field .,....................$ Soils/Asphail Technician .... .... .... .... .... ......... ....... $ Ultrasonic, Dye Penetrant, or Magnetic Particle Inspection .............. ......., ............. ,..".. $ Pachometerl Schmidt HammerlElcometer/ Torque Pull-Out Test on Embedded Bolts/ Anchors and Dowels "....................................$ Concrete, Masonry, Asphalt Coring or Sawing ...$ Floor Flatness / Levelness (Inc. Equipment)......$ Emissivity... ....... ........ ..... ........ .... ........... ........ ..... $ Ground Rod Test ...............................................$ 90.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour $ 65.00 Per Hour 75.00 Per Hour 130.00 Per Hour 0.03 Per sq ft 85.00 Per Hour 85.00 Per Hour EQUIPMENT Pick-Up and Delivery - Miscellaneous ................$ 40.00 Per Hour Skidmore-Wilhelm Bo[t Ce[I................................$ 40.00 Per Day Torque Wrench ..................................................$ 15.00 Per Day Air Meter ............................................................$ 20.00 Per Day Pachometer .......................................................$ 50.00 Per Day Schmidt Hammer ...............................................$ 30.00 Per Day Ultrasonic Equipment.........................................$ 40.00 Per Day Magnetic Particle Equlpment..............................$ 50.00 Per Day Dye Penetrant Equipment..................................$ 30.00 Per Day Jacking Assembly ..............................................$ 25.00 Per Day Nuclear Density Gauge......................................$ 40.00 Per Day Mobile Soils Laboratory......................................$ 40.00 Per Day Coring Equipment ..............................................$ 50.00 Per Day Emissivity Test Kit..............................................$ 40.00 Each Ground Rod Equipment......................................$ 40.00 Per Day TESTING MACHINES Testing Machine with Operator in Laboratory 0- 60,000 Pound Machine (Universal) ...........$ 125.00 Per Hour 800,000 Pound Machine (Universa[) ..............$ 200.00 Per Hour Effective January 1, 2006 Page 2 CONCRETE STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS A.S.T.M. C39 Concrete Cylinders (6" x 12") W/ Mold .....................,............. $ Lightweight FiIi Concrete (3" x 6"). $ Concrete or Gunite Cores, 6" Maximum Diameter, Including Trim .......................... $ Splitting Tensil. ........................... $ 6" x 6" Beams, Modulus of Ruptur................................. $ Handling Charg., Cylinders Not Broken/Hold....................... $ Handling Charge, Beams Not Broken/Hold....................... $ C469 Modulus of Elasticity.................... $ MIX DESIGN A.S.T.M. C192 C495 C39 C496 C78 20.00 Each 25.00 Each 35.00 Each 50.00 Each 50.00 Each, 10.00 Each 40.00 Each 75.00 Each Laboratory Trial Batch with Slump, and 6 Cylinders/Prisms Unit Weight, Air, (Sampling Extra) ...................... $ 350.00 Each Mix Design, Determination of Proportions .............................. $ 150.00 Each Review of Existing Mix Design ..... $ 125.00 Each MISCELLANEOUS TESTING C567 Unit Weight of Hardened Light Weight Concrete ...................... $ 40.00 Each C684 Rapid Cure Concrete Cylinders (Boil Method) ........................... $ 30.00 Each C157 Drying Shrinkage (3 Bars - Four Readings, up to 90 Days)............. $ 200.00 Set C495 Lightweight FiIi Concrete Density. $ 30.00 Each MASONRY STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS C780 Mortar Cylinders (2" x 4") w/ mold $ Cl09 Mortar Cubes (2" x 2") w/ moid..... $ C39 Grout Prisms (3" x 6") w/ moid ..... $ Handling Charge, Mortar or Prisms Not Broken/Hoid........... $ C140 Block Compression $ 8" x 8" x 16................................ $ C140 Block Compression > 8" x 8" x 16" .............................. $ E447 Grouted Masonry Prism Compression Test s 8" x 8" x 16"$ E447 Grouted Masonry Prism Compression Test> 8" x 8" x 16" Handling Charge, Grouted Prisms Not Broken/Hold....................... $ BLOCK A.S.T.M. C140 C140 C67 C426 20.00 Each 20.00 Each 20.00 Each 10.00 Each 35.00 Each 45.00 Each 100.00 Each Quotation 75.00 Each Moisture Content and Absorption. $ 45.00 Each Measurements............................. $ 25.00 Each Masonry Efflorescence................. $ 45.00 Each Linear Shrinkage (CMA Method) ......................... $ 95.00 Each Rapid Linear Shrinkage (British Modified Method) ......... $ 75.00 Each Bond Strength..............................$ 50.00 Each Masonry Core ~ Compression ..".. $ 35.00 Each Masonry Core - Shear.................. $ 65.00 Each C952 C39 Prevailing Wage Schedule of Fees BRICK AS.T.M. C67 C67 C67 C67 C67 C67 C67 C67 STEEL Compression... ... ...... .... ....... ... ...... $ Modulus of Rupture .....................$ Absorption, Soak .........................$ Absorption, Boll ...........................$ Absorption, Saturation Coefficient $ Initial Rate of Absorption ..............$ Efflorescence ..............................$ Efflorescence with Mortar .......,.....$ REINFORCEMENT A.S.T.M. A615 A615 No. 11 Bar and Smaller................$ No. 14, No. 18.............................. Bend Test No. 11 Bar and Smaller............... ..... ..... ..... .... ... $ Processing Mill Certificates (Per Size and Heat)..................$ STRUCTURAL STEEL A.S.T.M. A370 Tensile Strength Up to 100,000 Ibs.........................$ 100,000 to 200,000 Ibs.................$ Bend Test.....................................$ Pipe Flattening Test .....................$ Bolt Tensile Test ..........................$ Bolt Proof Test .............................$ Nut ProofTest..............................$ Nelson Stud Tensile Test .............$ Machining and Preparation of Samples ...............................$ Brinell & Rockwell Hardness Test..........................................$ Processing Mill Certificates (Per Size and Heat)..................$ Chemical Anaiysis ....... .......... .... ...$ PRESTRESS AS.T.M. A416 A416 Prestress Cable, 7 Wire (Yield /Tensile) ........................$ Prestress Wire (Yield /Tensile) ....$ Sample Preparation......................$ 35.00 Each 35.00 Each 25.00 Each 25.00 Each 35.00 Each 35.00 Each 45.00 Each 55.00 Each 35.00 Each Quotation 30.00 Each 20.00 Each 45.00 Each 55.00 Each 35.00 Each 30.00 Each 35.00 Each 25.00 Each 20.00 Each 35.00 Each 35.00 Each 35.00 Each 25.00 Each 75.00 Each 150.00 Each 140.00 Each 45.00 Per Hour WELD PROCEDURE AND WELDER QUALIFICATIONS Welder Certification (AWS)...........$ 75.00 Per Hour STRUCTURAL STEEL COUPON Weld Tensile Test.........................$ 40.00 Each Weld Bend Test............................$ 30.00 Each Weld-Macro Etch..........................$ 50.00 Each Machining and Preparation of Samples...............................$ 35.00 Each FIREPROOFING UBC 7-6 Unit Weight ..................................$ 35.00 Each ASTM-736 Adhesion/Cohesion ......................$ 15.00 Each ROOFING Unit Weight ..................................$ 55.00 Each UBC 15-5 Tile (Breaking Strength/ Absorption)...............................$ 60.00 Each Mineral Shake - Flexural...............$ 35.00 Each Mineral Shake -Absorption ..........$ 25.00 Each SOIL AND AGGREGATE CLASSIFICATION A.S.T.M. C136 C136 D422 01140 D422 0422 Sieve Analysis (> #4 Sieve) ........ $ Sieve Analysis (<#4 Sieve) ......... $ Sieve Analysis ( < #4 Sieve, Washed) .................................. $ #200 Wash .................................. $ Sieve Analysis ~ Combined .......... $ Hydrometer with Sieve Analysis ................................... $ liquid and Plastic Limit ................ $ Page 3 40.00 Each 40.00 Each 50.00 Each 30.00 Each 60.00 Each 125.00 Each 90.00 Each D4318 02419 CAL TM 217 Sand Equivalent (Set ofThree) .... $ 65.00 Set CAL TM 217 Cleanness Value.......................... $ 230.00 Each PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AS. T.M. C127 C128/D854 C127 C128/D854 D2216 03080 03080 D2166 D2435 D2435 UBC 18-2 D2434 D2434 Specific Gravity and Absorption (> #4 Sieve) .............................. $ 75.00 Each SpeCific Gravity and Absorption (< #4 Sieve) .............................. $ 65.00 Each SpeCific Gravity (> #4 Sieve)......... $ 60.00 Each Specific Gravity (< #4 Sieve)......... $ 50.00 Each Moisture Content ........................... $ 15.00 Each Direct Shear Quick Undisturbed ..... $ 100.00 Each Direct Shear Slow Undisturbed ........ Quotation Direct Shear Quick Remolded........ $ 160.00 Each Direct Shear Slow Remolded ........... Quotation Unconfined Compression............... $ 60.00 Each Consolidation - Time Rate.............. $ 275.00 Each Consolidation - WithoutTime Rate. $ 175.00 Each Expansion Index ............................ $ 90.00 Each Permeability - Undisturbed ............. $ 175.00 Each Permeability - Remoided ................ $ 225.00 Each SUBGRADE SUPPORT QUALITY AS.T.M. 01883 Bearing Ratio w/o M. O. Curve - Per Poin!.................................... $ 80.00 Each D2844 CAL TM 301 R-Value (3 Points).......................... $ 190.00 Each Lime, Cement or Bituminous Treatment available upon request. DENSITY CHARACTERISTICS A.S.T.M. 02937 D1557-A,B 01557-C D698-A,B D698-C Moisture / Density (Ring)................ $ Maximum Density .......................... $ Maximum Density .......................... $ Maximum Density ..........................$ Maximum Density.......................... $ Check Point (Maximum Density) .... $ C29 Unit Weight - Loose ....................... $ C29 Unit Weight - Rodded..................... $ CAL TM 216 Maximum Density.......................... $ CHEMICAL PROPERTIES CAL TMs 532/643 Resistivity ...................................... $ 532/643 pH.................................................. $ CAL TM 417 Sulphate ........................................ $ CAL TM 422 Chloride ......................................... $ Corrosivity Series....,...................... $ Chemical Analysis.......................... $ 25.00 Each 140.00 Each 150.00 Each 120.00 Each 130.00 Each 70.00 Each 35.00 Each 40.00 Each 150.00 Each 75.00 Each 45.00 Each 55.00 Each 55.00 Each 165.00 Each 75.00 Each Prevailing Wage Schedule of Fees AGGREGATE PROPERTIES A.S.T.M. C131 LA Abrasion....................................$ 140.00 Each C535 LA Abrasion....................................$ 150.00 Each CBB Soundness.....................................$ 275.00 Each C40 Organic impurities ..........................$ 40.00 Each C142 Clay Lumps I Friabie Particies........$ 90.00 Each C235 Soft Particles..................................$ 75.00 Each C123 Coal & Ligntte.................................$ 100.00 Each CRD 119 Percent Elongation I Flats ..............$ 145.00 Each CAL TM 205 Percent Crushed ............................$ 100.00 Each CAL TM 229 Durability........................................$ 150.00 Each ASPHALT CONCRETE GENERAL TESTING A.S.T.M. 02172 Bitumen Content ..........................$ 100.00 Each D13B, C117 Gradation of Extracted Sample.....$ 50.00 Each 011 BB Unit Weight - Molded Specimen or Cores ...................................$ 50.00 Each 02041 Theoretical Maximum Density ......$ 75.00 Each 01561, CAL TM 304 Compacted Maximum Density - HVEEM ....................................$ 120.00 Each 01559 Compacted Maximum Density- MARSHALL..............................$ 130.00 Each 01664 Stripping...................................,...$ 65.00 Each MIX DESIGN I CONTROL A.S. T.M. 01560 CAL TM 336 Mix Design - HVEEM including Aggregate Tests - Per Design ..$1,000.00Each 01159 Mix Design - MARSHALL includin9 Aggregate Tests - Per Design ..$1,200.00Each 01560 CAL TM 336 Field Mix - HVEEM - Stability Per Point..................................$ 150.00 Each 01559 Fieid Mix ~ MARSHALL-Stability Per Point..................................$ 160.00 Each MISCELLANEOUS Specimen Pick-Up Concrete/Mortar Cylinders and Grout Prisms ($1B.00 Minimum)...........................$ 6.00 Each Flexural Beams ($70.00 Minimum).................$ 35.00 Each Masonry Prism up to a" x 8" x 16" ($70.00 Minimum) ......................................$ 35.00 Each Masonry Prism, Larger than 8" x 8" x 16" ....... Quotation Gunite and Shotcrete Test Panels ($70.00 Minimum) .......................................$ 35.00 Each Fireproofing Sampies.....................................$ 35.00 Per Trip Sample Pick up outside 50 mile radius...........Quotation Page 4 BASIS OF CHARGES 1. A four hour minimum show-up charge will be incurred for all scheduled field services not canceled before 4:00 p.m. of the preceding day. A minimum four hour charge will be incurred for special deputy field services up to four hours and a minimum of eight hours will be incurred for special deputy field services in excess of four hours per day. A minimum four hour charge will be incurred for technician fieid services. A one-hour minimum charge will be incurred for any office services. 2. An overtime premium of time and one-half will be charged for any personnel services in excess of eight hours per day, up to and including twelve hours per day, and Saturday. Double time will be charged for over twelve hours in anyone day, Sunday and HOlida~s. Holidays are New Vears Day, Memorial Day, July 4 , Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day and the Friday after Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day. High priority laboratory testing at the Client's request which requires unscheduled overtime is subject to a 50% increase from the standard rates. 3. Swing (20') and graveyard (3"') shift will be charged at regular rates plus 15% and 20% respectively. 4. Sampling, specification review, discussion, and report preparation for field testing are charged at hourly rates. A minimum charge of $100.00 will be made for issuance of any engineering reports. Engineering review time of all field reports is estimated to be 0.2 hours per report. The charge for weekly report distribution is 1 hour per week. 5. There will be no charge for travel time and mileage within a 50 mile radius of our nearest office for deputy inspection only. For projects outside a 50 mile radius and less than 100 miles, the mileage rate will be 50 cents per mile. Engineers, Consultants, Supervisors and Technicians are charged portal to portal with minimums from the nearest office to site of work and return, unless othelWlse noted. 6. Reimbursable expenses such as. parking, air fare, car rental, food and lodging will be charged at cost plus 20%, unless provided. Subsistence on remote jobs by quotation, unless provided. 7. Outside services performed by others and direct costs expended on the Client's behalf are charged at cost plus 20%, unless othelWise noted. 8. Certified Payrolls will be supplied upon request at a cost of $75.00 per pay period. 9. There will be a minimum project set-up fee of $250 for obtaining plans, specifications, accounting/distribution information and filing of preliminary liens. Invoicing is performed on a monthly basis. Past due account will accumulate interest charges at the rate of 1 % per month 10. Prices for tests not quoted or discounts for volume work will be given upon request. Prices subject to change without notice. ~ GENERAL CONDITIONS a 1. This agreement and the attached Proposal, described by number on the reverse and incorporated herein by reference, constitute the entire agreement between the Client and Consultant. . 2. In the event any of these general conditions shouid be found to be unenforceable, it shall be stricken and the remaining provisions shall be enforceable. This contract is entered into in Orange County California. 3. Client shall secure the permission necessary to allow Consultant's personnel and equipment access to the project site at no cost to Consuitant. 4. Client agrees to notify Consultant twenty-four hours in advance of any necessary tests and observations. If Client assigns this responsibility to a contractor and/or subcontractor, architect, engineer, or job inspector, Client will defend, indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from any and all claims, damages and liability, including defense costs, arising from improper scheduling on the part of the responsible party. 5. Consultant's field investigation may yield samples and specimens. Non-hazardous samples or specimens will be discarded 30 days after testing and reporting unless othelWise instructed by Client. Client shall be responsible for costs of compliance procedures for any hazardous samples or specimens collected by Consultant in performing its services hereunder. 6. Client shall be responsible for advising Consultant of the existence of any hazardous substances or conditions existing in, on or near the project should such facts become known to Client. 7, Consultant shall perform its services in a manner consistent with the standard of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession practicing under similar conditions in the geographic vicinity and at the time the services are performed. No warranty or guarantee, express or implied, is made or intended by this agreement. 8. Consultant agrees to maintain workers' compensation, comprehensive general and automobile liability and professional liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000.00. If requested, Consultant will provide a certificate of insurance evidencing such coverages. Any fees paid by Consultant to name Client as an additional insured or increase basic coverage amounts will be billed to Client. 9. The Client agrees that in accordance with generally accepted construction practices, the construction contractor will be required to assume sole and complete responsibility for job site conditions during the course of construction of the project, including safety of all persons and property, and the Client agrees to defend, indemnify and hold Consultant harmless from all liability, real or alleged, in connection with the performance of work on this project, excepting liability arising from the sole negligence of the Consultant. 10. Consultant shall sign certifications only if Consultant approves the form of such certification prior to the commencement of service, and provided such certification is limited to a statement of professional opinion and does not constitute a warranty or guarantee, express or implied. 11. Client agrees any reliance upon any reports, plans, drawings, or other documents issued by Consultant shall only be for the purpose referenced in Consultant's Proposal and scope of work. 12. Client agrees to limit Consultant's liability due to professional negligence and to any liability arising out of or relating to this agreement to fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) or the amount of Consultant's fee, whichever is lesser. This limit applies to all services on this project, whether provided under this or subsequent agreements. 13. Consultant is not responsible for the completion or quality of work which is dependent upon or performed by the Client or third parties not under the direct control of Consultant. 14. The rates charged for Services are based on the current Consultant's Fee Schedule which is modified periodically. 15. Consultant's construction observation services, if any, shall be limited to observation of construction operations to provide Client with an understanding of the general nature, progress and quality of work based upon applicable standards of practice. Unless othelWise agreed in writing, or unless consistent with the standard of care, Consultant shall not be responsible for continuous or exhaustive inspection of the work. In no event shall Consultant be responsible for the means and methods of construction or for the safety procedures employed by the contractor. 16. Services provided under this agreement, including all reports, information or recommendations prepared or issued by Consultant, are for the exclusive use of the Client for the projeCt specified in the Proposal. No other use is authorized under this agreement. Client will not distribute or convey Consultant's reports or recommendations to any other person or organization other than those designated in Section 306 of the U.B.C., without Consultant's written authorization, and Client releases Consultant from liability and agrees to defend indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from any and all liability for damages arising, in whole or part, from such unauthorized distribution. Consultant's reports, fieid data, test resuits and other similar documents are instruments of professional service, not products. 17. If agreement is terminated before the completion of all services, unless Consultant is responsible for such early termination, Client agrees to release Consultant from all liability for work performed. 18. All fees and other charges will be billed monthly and shall be due at the time of billing unless othelWise specified in this agreement. Client agrees that the periodic billings from Consultant to Client are correct, conclusive, and binding upon Client, unless Client, within fourteen (14) days from the date of receipt of such billing, notifies Consultant in writing of alleged inaccuracies, discrepancies or errors in the billing. 19. If the Client fails to pay Consultant within thirty (30) days after invoices are rendered, Client agrees Consuitant shall have the right to consider such default in payment a material breach of this entire agreement, and upon written notice, the duties, obligations, and responsibilities of Consultant under this agreement are terminated. Client agrees to pay a late payment charge which will be computed at the periodic rate specified on the attached fee scheduie, and will be applied to any unpaid balance commencing thirty (30) days after the date of the original billing. In the event of termination, Consultant reserves the right and shall have the right to notify governmental agencies or other regulatory bodies of the termination of Its services. 20. If Consultant is required to provide services such as depositions, expert witness testimony, etc., related to this project, Client agrees to pay Consultant at hourly rates in accordance with Consultant's fee schedule effective when services are rendered. 21. If litigation is initiated to enforce thi!l agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonabie costs and attorney's fees. ITEM NO.8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ 11/2 tf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Award the Construction Contract for Route 79 South Medians between 1-15 and Butterfield Stage Road, Project No. PW02-14 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council; 1. Award a construction contract for Route 79 South Medians between 1-15 and Butterfield Stage Road, Project PW02-14, including the Base Bid and Additive Bid #2, to Beador Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $4,655,000 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 2. Authorize the City Managerto approve change orders nol!o exceed the contingency amount of $465,500, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 3. Authorize an appropriation of $530,000 from Crowne Hill Community Facilities District (CFD) - Caltrans Improvement Fund; 4. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $1,728,279 from General Fund Capital Reserves to fully fund this project. BACKGROUND: The Route 79 South Median Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 2006-201 O. This project will construct raised landscaped medians on Route 79 South between 1-15 and Butterfield Stage Road. The project will also include adding double left-turns to existing traffic signals and new underground storm drain improvements. The project was advertised for construction bids with a base bid and three additive bids. The base bid covered all median, irrigation and landscape improvements from 1-15 to Margarita Road. Additive bid #1 includes raised median only from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road, (excluding landscaping and irrigation). Additive bid #2 includes full improvements from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Additive #3 is a GPS/GIS irrigation data collection system. The total Engineer's estimate for this project was $4,700,000.00. The specifications allow one hundred and forty (140) working days for the completion of this project. Five (5) bids were received and publicly opened on April 13, 2006. The results were as follows: BIDDER BASE BID TOTAL BID WITH ADDITIVE BID #2 1. Beador Construction Co. $3,214,300.00 $4,655,000.00 2. Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. $3,401,785.00 $4,808,315.50 3. Sully-Miller Contracting, Co. $3,463,100.05 $5,065,000.00 4. Environmental Construction, Inc. $3,552,003.08 $5,463,875.25 5. Riverside Construction Co., Inc. $4,631,690.00 $6,539,475.00 Staff recommends that the Base Bid and Additive Bid #2 be awarded in the amount of $4,655,000.00. This will allow all the median work including landscaping and irrigation from 1-15 to Butterfield Stage Road to be constructed. $140,000.00 is also required to cover the costs for construction engineering, inspection and geotechnical engineering and $136,845.00 in project administration costs. This brings the total amount required for the entire project to $5,397,345.00. The current budget balance is $3,139,066.14. To fully fund this project $2,258,278.86, is required from Capital Reserves. Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Beador Construction Company of Corona, California to be the lowest responsible bidder. Beador Construction Company has extensive experience with roadway projects and has successfully completed similar projects for other public agencies. FISCAL IMPACT: The Route 79 South median project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program funded with Assessment District 159 and Street Development Improvement Fees. Additional funds in the amount of $2,258,279 are required from the General Fund Capital Reserves and the Crowne Hill CFD to fund the entire project. This brings the total construction costs to $5,397,345, which includes construction, project administration, and construction engineering costs in addition to a 10% contingency amount of $465,500. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Description 2. Location Map 3. Contract t- t- oo ~ t:l ~ =: Eo< ~ 0 00 0\ t- o S 0 ..: E 00 ~ ~ 0 / c "l Ql ^ t; ;l E:: z~ [;::I. .... ~ '" ., .~ ~ 0 .. I>.. .... " ~ , N 0 '" ;;:; i3: '" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ OJ 0 0 0 0 0 E-< 0 ..... '-D 0 0 " 0_ E-< OJ ;:;l <l) ~ 0' 0' 0' ,,- '" OJ) ..... Q. 00 N '-D N 00 0 '" '" 6 0_ "l ..... 0 0 ;:;l CIl U U '" '" "d ~ " €A €A €A €A €A <P 5 ..... 1:i 0 A:1 .-< 0 , "" ..... 0 '" 0 ~ .... , .... S 0 "" <i:: 0 , ~ 00 0 0 0 .... CIl '" t- <l) 0 0 0 0 ..d 1:i 00 0 t- o t- o '" 0_ '" 1:i 0 0 0' ",- ,,- J>:: , ~ 0 .... 0 '-D N 00 CIl <l) 0 ~ '-D t- "- '" '" 0 '" '" t- ..... .... CIl <l) €A €A €A €A ..... OJ) '" P l=i 0 0 J>:: OJ ,9 <l) '" '" 00 '" P ~ .... r-- ..... '" g 0 '" CIl '" :0 , ~ .... \C> OJ) N <l) '[) 0 P' '-D S 0 0 '" "d .... Q OJ '-D <l) a ..... r-< '" ~ ~ ..... ::;: P 0 " ..... <l) '" '" ~ P <.B ~ a =: :0 N 0 '" " 0 0 0 0 0 .... ~ <l) ~ '" 0 0 0 0 0 '" f-; S "d " \C> '-D 0 0 " 0 OJ <l) ~ 0 0' 0' 0' ,,- ",- '" <l) '" .2:;> U 0 ..... 101 '8 "-' , <l) ~ ~ ." 00 N '-D N 00 OJ '" <l) '" 5 .... 0 ~ 0 N_ '" ~ .... g t 0 ",- '" ~ "" " !i' .... '" ~ ..... <l) .... 0 -< ~ ..... " ,s " 0 " '" r-< ..... .... €A €A €A €A €A 'I:: jQ "d '" ~ I l'1 ..... <l) .8 '" "i'i '" '" 0 i:5 bb "@ " ..... <l) 0 .g "d ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 5 P .~ ~ 101 :0 ~ ..... a 'Ii t- '" N N '" t- o i3: '" OJ t-_ '" t- '" 0 <l) s '" P " .... -:;; r-< '" 5 P ..... .,f' '" ~ t-- 0;- N- 6 0.. S &: E-< g " OJ) " 00 '" Q '" '-D '" '" o ..0 '" .~ <l) "- ..... ~ '" " s ~ :g ,~ " ~ OJ P '" 0 <l) .... 0 <l) ::: '" < ..... '" :> ,~ ..... iJ '" <l) <l) 0 ~ '" U ~ 0 ~ €A €A €A €A €A €A < OJ>:: E-< ~ OJ) ~ l'1 '1:: <l) '" ~ <l) ..... u P '" ~ fj '" i 0 0 '" U U 'Cl OJ l'1 = ~ ~ 0; ~ 'S ..... 0 ::;: '" " ,~ P P t; ..... = ... OJ '" ,9 .9 0iJ '"' .~ OJ ~ .- .... E-< 0 .... ..... ..... 0 6 .... ... ..... " " 0 f::J ..... 0 ~ ~ '" ~ ~ .... '2 5h~ OJ OJ " ... OJ t;:l .... ..... ..... ... " c OJ '" Q. OJ 's '" '" '" ... .- '" .~ '" ~ 0 0 = .... P l'1 '" ..... .... '" ... OJ " OJ 0 "d 0 0 <l) 0 '" 0 ~ Q '" Il:< E-< < U UOE-< '"' '" CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. PW02-14 79 SOUTH MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 25th day of April, 2006, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and Beador Construction Company, Inc. hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR." WITNESSETH: That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: 1, CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW02- 14, 79 SOUTH MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications for Construction of Local Streets and Roads, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW02-14, 79 SOUTH MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 1612 South Clementine St. Anaheim, California 92802 (714) 517-0970 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW02-14, 79 SOUTH MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions, Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. CONTRACT C-1 R:ICIPIPROJECTSIPW02IPW02.14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2, SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: PROJECT NO. PW02-14, 79 SOUTH MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY. 3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives, 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to bed one, the sum of: FOUR MILLION SIX HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($4,655,000.00), the total amount of the base bid. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed ONE HUNDRED FORTY (140) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY, except for that portion of work from 1-15 Freeway to 200' east of Pechanga Parkway, which shall be completed by July 31, 2006. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY. 5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. 6. PAYMENTS A. LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE: Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's payment requests. B. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Ccide, within thirty (30) days after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or CONTRACT C-2 R:ICIP\PROJECTSIPW02IPW02-14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do' about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms provided by the CITY, C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. D, Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30) days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. E, In accordance with Section 9-3,2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction. and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project is more than 50% complete, The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce the retention to the Engineer. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES - EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract, this also includes all work between 1-15 Freeway to 200' east of Pechanga Parkway, which is required to be completed by July 31, 2006. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY, Within ten (10) calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, CONTRACTOR shall give written notice to CITY. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, CONTRACTOR shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to CITY. CONTRACTOR'S failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute CONTRACTOR'S w<iliver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against CITY, 8, WAIVER OF CLAIMS, On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. CONTRACT C-3 R:ICIPIPROJECTSIPW02IPW02-14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do 9. PREVAILING WAGES, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California Department of Industrial Relation's Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. That portion of all work between 1-15 Freeway to 200' east of Pechanga Parkway shall be completed by July 31,2006. 11, INDEMNIFICATION, All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone. CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY. 12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13, CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an CONTRACT C-4 R:ICIPIPROJECTS\PW02IPW02-14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do' affidavit covering disputed claims 0 r items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15, NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY. 17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers. CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work, 18. DISCRIMINATION, CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation, 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST, No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of t he City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or othervvise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than t he City of T emecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101- 336, as amended. CONTRACT C-5 R:ICIPIPROJECTS\PW02IPW02-14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do' 22, WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the CITY addressed as follows: Mailing Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula P,O, Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Street Address: William G. Hughes Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590-3606 CONTRACT C,6 R:ICIPIPROJECTSIPW02\PW02-14 SR 79 S MedianslAgreementslConstruction Contract.do IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR Beador Construction Company, Inc. 26320 Lester Circle Corona, CA 92883 (951) 674-7352 David A. Beador, President Print or type NAME Print or type TITLE (Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations) DATED: CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Robert, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M, Thorson, City Attorney ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk CONTRACT C-7 R:ICIPIPROJECTSIPW02IPW02-14 SR 79 S MedlanslAgreementslConstruc!on Contract.do' EXHIBiT 'C" - STANDARD PLANS C-l R:\CIP\PROJECTSlPW02.IPW02-14 SR 79 S Medians\AgreementslConstruction Contractdot ITEM NO.9 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /JJL 9g CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jim O'Grady, Assistant City Manager DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Approve Economic Development Event Sponsorship Requests PREPARED BY: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council; 1. Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $10,000 cash and city support costs in the amount up to $6,100 forthe Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival; 2. Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $35,000 for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. In addition, the Festival requests thatthe City will provide temporary logistical support of traffic control signs and devices to assist with public safety during the Festival estimated at $1 ,400; 3. Approve the Event Sponsorship Agreement in the amount of $60,000 for the 2006 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival; 4. Approve an appropriation of an additional $30,000 to the original budget allocation of $30,000 from the Unreserved General Fund bringing total sponsorship for the 2006 Temecula Valley Film & Music Festival event to $60,000; 5. Authorize the Mayor to execute the above-mentioned agreements. BACKGROUND: Staff has received sponsorship requests for the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival, the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival and the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. The City of Temecula has previously sponsored these events. The City of Temecula hosts a wide array of special events year-round all adding to its rich qualityof life. Residents and visitors look forward to attending these popular events each year and the events help make Temecula the unique community that it is. The events increase tourism revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, shopping centers and wineries. Due to the fact that these special events promote tourism in Temecula, the funding would come from the Economic Development Department budget within the City's General Fund. In addition, City support services would come from the General Fund's budget. There will be no commissions, consultant fees and/or salaries paid to any party from the City of Temecula's sponsorship. TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL JAZZ FESTIVAL Staff has received a request from the Musicians Workshop to sponsor the 2006 Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival in the amount of $10,000 cash plus city support costs. Staff estimates that City support costs for police, fire, community services and other staff support will be approximately $6,1 00. The event organizer will pay for all rental costs forthe Temecula Community Theater. The 3'd annual International Jazz Festival will be held July 7 - 9, 2006. This event will provide a combination of free to the public and ticketed concert events featuring internationally acclaimed performers at different venues at several locations throughout Old Town Temecula, as well as music and rhythm workshops and clinics with the performers. A Main Street Art Faire is also planned for the Festival. Estimated attendance for the weekend event is expected to reach approximately 10,000 people. The Musicians Workshop and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency will coordinate some of the entertainment and promotion for the Jazz Festival and Old Town Hot Summer Nights programs. Jazz concerts will kick-off the Hot Summer Nights series on Friday and Saturday evenings. Saturday events will require the closure of Main Street and 3'd Street. The street closures will be brought back to Council for separate action prior to the event. The City of Temecula sponsorship will be used exclusively to produce the "free to the public events" and pay for the entertainment at those venues. Festival proceeds will benefit the Musicians Workshop and the Temecula Valley Cultural Arts & Music Center Building Fund. 2006 MarketinQ and Promotion The 2006 marketing and promotion program will consist of newspaper, magazine, radio, cable, flyers, posters, festival guide and Internet. This yearwill include cross-promotional advertising with the City's Hot Summer Nights program. 2005 Event Recap The 2005 International Jazz Festival was held July 14 -17. Attendance for the weekend event was estimated between 7,000 - 8,000 guests. Twenty bands performed during the Festival and over 100 musicians came to participate from around the world. Some of the International performers included: Ernie Andrews, Richie Cole, Dick Berk, Holly Hofmann, Jeff Hamilton, Mike Wofford, Christoph Luty, Paula West, Scott Martin and Jennifer Scott. Entertainment at The Promenade in Temecula included the Blues Revue Band, Musicians Workshop Advanced Jazz Band, Holly Hoffman Quartet, Renee Lee, Richie Cole, the Alto Madness Orchestra and Paula West. On Saturday, an Arts & Crafts Faire and the Chuck Niles Music Award Competition was held at the Temecula Duck Pond. In addition, entertainers including Common Sense, Piotr Rodowicz and the Mingus Mingus Band, and Scott Martin and the Latin Soul band performed. On Sunday, Mountain View Community Church and Bandido de Amor performed at The Promenade. Piotr Rodowicz Trio and Judy Chamberlain Trio performed at Baily's Restaurant. The festival concluded with a wrap-up party held at the Eagles Nest at Pechanga Resort and Casino, featuring The Jon Laskin Band. The International Jazz Festival media exposure reached over 1.5 million people via radio, newspaper, magazines and cable television. Additional coverage included flyers, posters and 20,000 official festival guides which were inserted in the Californian newspaper. The Festival had television news coverage in San Diego and Riverside Counties on KUSI Channel 9 and CMEX workshops. Event OrQanizers The Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival organizers are The Musicians Workshop, a California Non-Profit 501 (c)(3) public benefit corporation, in collaboration with The Arts Council of Temecula Valley. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL Staff has received a request from The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Association to provide $35,000 for the 2006 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. In addition, the Festival is requesting the City to provide temporary logistical support of traffic control signs and devices to assist with public safety during the event. The Festival will be celebrating its 23rd-year anniversary at Lake Skinner and will be held June 2 - 4, 2006. The 2005 Festival drew approximately 38,000 spectators for the three-day event. Headliner entertainment at the 2005 Festival included Eddie Money, Starship, The Calling, John Waite and Lou Gramm, lead singer of Foreigner. The 2005 media outreach included newsletters, custom book marks, small jigsaw puzzles, flyers, posters, print, radio, television, Internet, and cable. Advertising was purchased in newspapers, USA Today, on San Diego television, and on Los Angeles, Inland Empire, Orange and San Diego County radio stations. Newspaper advertising was sponsored by The Press-Enterprise, Californian and North County Times. A USA Today advertisement was purchased in May and was part of an insert commemorating the 50'h Anniversary of Disneyland. Broadcast media selling sponsorships included Adelphia (cable television in the Inland Empire), K-Frog, and KABC 790 radio. The Festival's media preview and private invitation yielded three television news segments which included KCAL-Los Angeles, CBS-Los Angeles, and La Nuestra. In addition, there was a live broadcast with KTLA-WB's Gayle Anderson, flying in a hot air balloon over the Festival. Additional coverage included: KABC Los Angeles, KGTV San Diego, Today Show/NBC, and KNSD - NBC San Diego. The Festival received more coverage in wine publications, magazines, and daily metro newspapers than previous years. They had over 7 million print impressions. The 2006 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival event will maintain the same format as the 2005 Festival. On June 20d the Festival will kick-off with headline entertainment and a balloon glow. Saturday and Sunday offers a "Festival within a Festival," with top-name concerts, wine tasting in the Wine Gardens, Kids Faire, Arts & Crafts and Commercial exhibits and the food court. The 2006 marketing/advertising campaign will include advertising in newspapers. Commercials and promotions will be lined up with radio stations from Riverside, Orange County, Los Angeles to San Diego Counties: local cable television advertisements and collateral materials. An aggressive publicity campaign will target major television network news, network morning and feature news shows, West Coast magazines and Southern California newspapers. TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM & MUSIC FESTIVAL Staff has received a request to sponsor the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival (TVIFF) in the amount of $60,000. On April 12, 2006, the Economic Development Subcommittee, consisting of Councilmembers Ron Roberts and Chuck Washington, recommended that the City Council approve an additional $30,000 to the original budget allocation of $30,000 bringing total sponsorship for the 2006 event to $60,000. This year the event will be held September 13 -17,2006, at the Movie Experience 1 O-plex atTower Plaza in Temecula. The Festival's Awards Gala Night is planned to return to Pechanga Resort & Casino. The MusicFest component may be held at The Promenade Mall. The Festival will be presented once again by Cinema Entertainment Alliance. Selected films will be limited to 100 with the primary focus on quality produced and directed films by women, area filmmakers and on comedy genre films. The 2006 marketing strategy will include a working partnership with the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and the Temecula Valley Woman's Club to market the festival to help increase festival awareness and attendance. A cross-promotions partnership with KBH Entertainment and the MusicFest component will allow one music showcase per month to be produced solely for TVIFF which will be covered by music trade magazines. The TVIFF will receive marketing support from Paramount Studios. In addition, TVIFF will contact local group sales directors to increase festival awareness. TVIFF will continue its alliances with the American Film Institute, Rome Independent Film Festival, Australia Film Television and Radio School, Film Independent, Chapman University, San Diego State University and the USC School of Cinema and Television. SamplinQ of 2005 Festival Publicitv and HiQhliQhts The 2005 Festival attendance was over 10,000. Award honorees included: Mary Steenburgen, Leonard Martin, Steve Dorff, John Badham, Rick Schroder, Natasha Hentsridge, Lucas Foster and Jean Picker Firstenberg. Media coverage and media hits from print and the Internet ranged from local, regional, national and international coverage. A sampling includes: Clear Channel, Empire Relations 'Market Watch', MSNBC internet site, and Wireless Flash News. Film and music industry trade publications included Hollywood Reporter.com, Billboard.com, Music Connection, and Backstage West. The 2005 Festival publicity included flyers, posters,lnternet, press releases, radio, print media and cable television. A sampling of local print media included: North County Times, The Press Enterprise, The Californian, Valley Business Journal, Neighbors Magazine, and Entertainment Roundup. Radio coverage included live remotes, interviews, and mentions by: KA TY, 101.3 FM, Smooth Jazz 1490, Q103.3, and 94.5 FM. The 2005 Festival received 800 film submissions, 189 of which were selected and screened. The Music Competition selected 12 artists and bands from a field of over 275. Celebrity honorees, presenters and guests were very impressive. Over 300 filmmakers, musicians, producers, directors, writers, judges, casts and crews from as far as China and Russia and as close as our neighbor communities of Corona, Hemet and San Diego were on hand to participate in the festivities. FISCAL IMPACT: The city-support costs for each event will be included in the FY 2006-07 Operating Budget of the various support departments for the recommended sponsorship amounts. Adequate funds for the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival have been included in the FY 2005-06 Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5266) for the recommended sponsorship amount of $10,000 cash. City support costs up to $6,100 for city support costs have been included in the FY2005-06 Operating Budget of the various support departments. Adequate funds for the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival have been included in the FY 2005-06 Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5266) for the recommended sponsorship amount of $35,000. In addition, the logistical support costs are estimated at $1 ,400 and funds are available in the Public Works Budget. Adequate funds for the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival have been included in the FY 2005-06 Operating Budget (Economic Development line item, account #001-111-999-5266) for the recommended sponsorship amount of $30,000. An additional appropriation of $30,000 from the Unreserved General Fund is necessary to fund this agreement. The Economic Development Subcommittee of the City Council (Mayor Roberts and Mayor Pro Tem Washington) has recommended approval of these amounts. ATTACHMENTS: I. Temecula Vallev International Jazz Festival Attachment A - Sponsorship Benefits Attachment B - Estimated City Support Services and Costs Attachment C- 2006 Event & Media Promotions Attachment D -2006 Budget & Financials Attachment E - 2005 Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival Recap Attachment F - Sponsorship Agreement II. Temecula Vallev Balloon & Wine Festival Attachment A - Sponsorship Benefits Attachment B - 2006 Event & Media Promotions Attachment C - 2006 Budget and Financial Statements Attachment D - 2005 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Recap Attachment E - Sponsorship Agreement III. Temecula Vallev International Film & Music Festival Attachment A - Sponsorship Benefits Attachment B - 2006 Event & Media Promotions Attachment C - 2006 Budget Attachment D - 2005 Temecula Valley Int'I Film & Music Festival Recap Attachment E - Sponsorship Agreement Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival Attachments Benefits As a Presenting Sponsor of the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival, The City of Temecula will receive the following comprehensive package of benefits: Logo and Exclusivity . Presenting Sponsor designation ofthe "Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival" . Festival Logo and Presenting Sponsor designation may be used in sponsor's marketing and PR . Category and product exclusivity if desired. On-Site . Two (2) 10' x 10' booths in the prominent locations in Old Town Temecula to include in each booth: (Value of $2,000) . One (I) 10' x 10' canopy . One (I) 8' table . Two (2) chairs . Signage at all Entertainment Stages - must be provided . Two (2) 2' x 8' Banners to be displayed at the event . The City of Temecula name displayed at Information Booth . Public address announcements read on stage throughout event . NEW THIS YEAR - City ofTemecula Logo on souvenir items including Festival T-shirts and wine glasses Advertising . City of Temecula Name and Logo included in all Festival advertising . City of Temecula Name and Logo incorporated into all media releases . City ofTemecula Logo on 25,000 "Official Festival Guide" Programs - distributed through The Californian Newspaper . City of Temecula Logo on 500 event posters displayed throughout the community . City ofTemecula Logo on 250 event double sided "Window Stickers" displayed throughout the community. Website . City ofTemecula Logo will be prominently displayed on the Festival website with hyperlink to http://www.cityoftemecula.org/ Program . City of Temecula Logo prominently displayed on event program . Full page advertisement in event program Tickets/Passes . 30 Tickets - Pre-Festival "TITLE SPONSOR" Party (Value of$I,500) . 100 Tickets - Opening Night "Kick-Off' Party (Value of $6,500) . 30 VIP seating for both Saturday & Sunday (Value of $3,000) . 30 VIP Car Passes for preferred parking in Old Town Temecula On Friday night, July 8th, we will be hosting an opening night reception at the Old Town Temecula Theater. This "Kick-Off' Party will feature the performances by the featured performers of the event. As a Presenting Sponsor, Paradise Chevrolet / Cadillac will be provided 100 tickets to this exclusive reception, which can be given to your employees or most valued clients. In addition, those in attendance will be able to "meet & greet" with legendary jazz performers and network with other sponsors at the festival. . 2 ATTACHMENT I. B TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL JAZZ FESTIVAL ESTIMATED CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the 2006 Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. The following expenses can be anticipated for this event: Police: $1,600 Fire: $ 800 Public Works: $ 450 Community Services: $2,750 Code Enforcement: $ 480 TOTAL: $6,080 i i I Mose Allison i i I I Ernestine Anderson I i Fri. July 7- 9:15 pm Old i I Sat. July 8 - 9:15 pm Old Town I Town Temecula Community i i Temecula Community Theater i Theater (ticketed) - 42051 I' I (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street, - Tel i Main Street, - Tel , I 866.01dTown (866.653-8696) I 866.01dTown (866.653-8696) I i ---.-.......----....--..--..-,.'... .... . '. .... ...-...- ....-- --.. .. . . .. -, I , i [ i i , I i I i i I I Ricl,ie Cole i I Richie Cole ! Sat. July 8 - 7:45 pm with Powder I Blues on the Main Street Saturday I ~~~ti;r;;_~':;~:y. Jul~~:7-, i , i i . I~.I , i i I Sat. July 8 - 7:45 pm with I I Richie Cole & Jon Laskin on I i the Main St. Sat. Night Stage I i i ._.___J ennifer Scott Private Partv for Ed Johnson & Novo Presenting Sponsors. and with Ed Johnson Novo Tempo with Jennifer Scott Tempo reception for Mose i Reception for Mose Allison Concert Allison Concert Fri. July 7 - I Fri. July 7 - 9:15 pm Old Town 9:15 pm Old Town Temecula ! Temecula Community Theater Community Theater ! (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street, - Tel (ticketed) - 42051 Main 866.OldTown (866.653-8696) Street, - Tel 866.OldTown , f!~.6~3-869~L___,.,.",.,_,_______".J ohn W orlev Reception for Mose Allison Concert Fri. July 7 - 9:15 pm Old Town Temecula Community Theater (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street. - Tel 866.01dTown (866.653- 8696) Kris Strom ReceDtion fori Mose Allison Concert Fri. ! ul 7 - 9:15 m Old Town Temecula Community Theater (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street. - Tel 866.01dTown [866.653-8696) I ,,"_.J udv Wexler ulio I Fb!ueroa & Kvrios Opening for Mose Allison Concert ! Sat. July 8 _ 6:30 pm on the Fri. July 7 - 9:15 pm Old Town , T ul C . Th t ! Main St. Sat. Night Stage emec a ommum~ ea er . (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street, - Tel i ~~.6.Old.:rown{ll.6~~~53:~~.9.62._ Sherwood Sled2e Opening for Ernestine- Anderson Concert Sat. July 8 - 9:15 pm Old Town Temecula Communi~ Theater (ticketed) - 42051 Main Street, - Tel ~~6.()I~l'ol'l'll (~~6~~5~:8~96) ......... ...... ......! i I , i i I [ I ul 8 Front St. South Sta Sun. ! dmund I ul 9 1 m Old Town Coffee Housel Velasco Fri. Tulv 7. 6pm i 41915 Third Street - Tel. 951.693- i Front Street North Stage 15909 : I'<_~~ .<.-. M....._.._...._..._~m""_.. ...""-,, "-_.~,--,.~-,,.._,_.,,-~..,-,._-----_._-_.~j I , ! I , I ! ! Sunday Gos~ Jon Laskin. Concerts with i Richie Cole. Dick Berk. Rodena Preston & 75 IJennifer Scott Wrap Partv Sun. members of The G?spel I ul 9- 7 to 11 mE les Nest at Workshop of Amenca Sun. ! Pechanga Resort & Casino _ 45000 ul 9- 1 to 5 m Old Town i Pechanga Parkway Temecula Community I Theater (ticketed) - 42051 I Main Street, - Tel , I i~~6.QldToVl'Il (866.653-8~!~) mJ Congressional Lifetime Achievement Award certificates for: Sammv N estico iiOfnO or lhoe- Chuck Nios,Mot'OOliOi Jou libl'0ly ..~ _____ _ __ _ n_~____ CHUCK NILES JAZZ MUSIC AWARD COMPETITION SPONSORED IN PART BY KJAZZ 88.1 & 89.1 - Click here to enter the Chuck Niles Jazz Award COnrPi!tiJ!o." ... ... ...- Main Street Art Faire 11am - 9:30Dm I Click here for Art or Food Vender ADDlication Old Town Coffee House Stage 41915 Third Street - Tel. 951.693- 5909 OLD TOWNTEMllCULA CZOMMUNITY l'aBATEIl. "C~hfl~~Wcn,' Kicking off Hot Summer Nights North Front Street Stage Friday & Saturday 7pm to lOpmi i South Front Street Stage Main Street , Saturday Night I Stage I i _~:~~E_m _ __~ 9:~Op~i P~OOdby ~I"'I Jeff Stone SUpttrllibt 3td. Dilluili:t Media support As a Non-Profit corporation, we generate over $70,000 in media support from over a dozen different Media sponsors both in print and on air. We have created a strategic media plan that will generate interest in and awareness of the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival with Riverside County as Presenting Sponsor, while specifically targeting our key markets. Because artists are internationally renowned, the Jazz Festival will attract national and international attention. Our media campaign has been developed through in-kind trades with all of our media sponsors. The negotiated media value of this campaign is approximately $70,000. Television In the past, the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival has secured the television support ofKUSI News, a San Diego station. In addition, we have had agreements with Comcast, our local cable provider, to present our public service announcements. We expect more in 2006. Radio KKJZ 88.1 FM, KMET 1490 AM, KMYT 94.5 FM, and KATY 101.3 FM are past media sponsors that have providing radio spots and airtime. We have been given over IS hours of combined airtime on these stations and announcements will run six to ten times daily between the hours of7:00 am and 9:00 pm. . K-Jazz KKJZ 88.1 FM serves Los Angeles County, Orange County and the Inland. Empire with one ofthe highest rated jazz stations in the U.S. · Smooth Jazz KMET 1490 AM is the "Inland Empire's Jazz Relaxation Station." In addition to its focus onjazz music, KMET 1490 AM also has a dedicated sports audience, including the fans of their new show, One Hour Golf. . KMYT 94.5 FM is a classic pop rock station that has a strong listener base in San Diego. . KA TY 10 1.3 FM is an adult contemporary station with upscale listeners between the ages of 25 - 54 who often place bit ticket items high on their shopping list. Newspapers and magazines We have secured numerous full page or part ad commitments from the following publications: The Californian, Neighbors Newspaper, Country Review Magazine, The Valley Business Journal, Valley Living Magazine, Temecula/Murrieta Valley News, Under The Sun Magazine, Los Angeles Times, LA Jazz Scene, Inland Empire Magazine, Press Enterprise and Under the Sun Magazine. Full page color ads will be published in March issues of all the magazines and monthly publications. These ads will run until the festival date. Daily and weekly publications will run multiple ads throughout their papers, with a light emphasis in the upcoming months, but a heavier campaign as the festival approaches. Budget for International Jazz Festival 2006 Summa", of Profit/Loss Actuai otal Revenue $57,550.00 otal Exoenses $49,200,00 Revenue - Exoenses** $8,350.00 Expenses: *"""Slte Estimated Room/Hall/Tent rental $2.500.00 Insurance / Permits I Fees $300,00 Equipment $300,00 T-Shirts $1.500,00 $4,600.00 Refreshments Food $500,00 Refreshments $250.00 linens $200.00 Ice $150.00 $1,100.00 Publicity Graphics $500,00 Photocopying/Printing- $500.00 Postage $250.00 $1,250.00 Light/stage/Sound Sound $0.00 Staging $0,00 lighting $0.00 Backline $0.00 Total Package $7.500.00 $7,500.00 Advertising Californian-inkind match $2,500.00 Print Media $500.00 Radio Media In~Kind $ J .500.00 National Television $0.00 $4.500,00 Thur. Presenting Night Baily's Dinner $1,500.00 Frl Night Kick-off Catering plus In-Kind $0.00 other $1.250,00 $2,750,00 Entertainment Pre Festival Events 2 days of "free concerts" $27.500.00 Transporfation $0.00 $27.500,00 Total Expenses $49,200,00 Revenue: Admissions Actual Actual 200 Mose Allison $25,00 $5,000,00 200 Ernestine Andersor $25.00 $5.000.00 150 Gospel Day Pass $15.00 $2.250.00 $12,250.00 City & Corporate Sponsors I Gity@ $10.000.00 $10.000,00 0 Title@ $0,00 $0,00 1 Presenting $10.000,00 $10.000.00 1 Presenting $10,000,00 $10,000,00 $30,000,00 9ther Sponsors 0 Major Sponsor @ $5,000,00 $0,00 0 Stage Sponsor@ $3,500,00 $3,500,00 1 VIP Sponsor $2,500.00 $2,500.00 3 Display Sponsor $1,000.00 $3.000.00 $9,000,00 Other Income 0 T-shirts/ CD's ete $0.00 $300.00 0 Renfallncome $0.00 $1,500.00 1 Coffee House $1,500,00 $1,500.00 1 RDA funding $3,000,00 $3,000.00 $6,300.00 Total Income $57,550.00 *. Procedes to support Musicians Workshop and Temecula Valley Culfural Arts and Music Center Building Fund 2:59 PM 03122/05 _~._Accrual Basis , , I MUSICIANS WORKSHOP Profit & Loss January 1 through March 22, 2005 Jan 1 - Mar 22, 05 ) Ordinary Income/Expense Income Art Commissions Bank Correction CASH RETURN Donation Donation ~ Restricted Memberships NAMM Parking Fees Rental Income Sales Sponsorship Ticket Sales Tuition Total Income Expense Accounting & Taxes Audio Bank Adjustment CASH Cleaning Drum Circle Instructor Dues and Subscriptions Equipment Rental Food Graphics Insurance Liability Insurance Insurance - Other Total Insurance Interest Expense Loan Interest Interest Expense - Other Totallnteresl Expense Labor Licenses and Permits Mangagement Expense Miscellaneous Moving & Storage Office Supplies Piano Tuning Postage and Delivery Printing and Reproduction Refund Tuition Rent Repairs Security Sound Equipment Rental Teacher Tuition Payment Telephone Use Permit Utilities Total Expense 332.00 44.00 300.00 320.00 1,000.00 2,549.00 355.00 511.00 3BB.00 330.00 2,633.00 7,53B.BB 6,111.00 22,411.BB 423.66 250,00 10.00 300.00 415,00 450,00 190.00 332.94 32B.45 400,00 71B.98 1,003.0B 1,722,06 Net Ordinary Income 116.67 233,34 350.01 BO.OO 0,00 1,500.00 lB.61 4BO,OO 249.72 100.00 231,00 1,B19.51 305.00 490.00 B2.11 175,00 1,500.00 5,667,07 702,32 100,00 347,30 19,019.76 3,392.12 Net Income 3,392,12 Page 1 l. ) 1. Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival 2005 Statistics - Estimated 7000 to 8000 in Attendance from July14-17 - 20 Bands, Four days at 4 locations both free & ticketed events - Over 100 Musicians came to participate from around the world - Exposure to over 1.5 million people via radio, newspaper, magazines and cable TV - Over a dozen Magazine and Newspaper Media coverage - Hundreds of Ads on both FM and AM radio station advertisements (approx, $50,000 donated In-Kind Trade in Advertising) - Television news coverage in San Diego and Riverside Counties . KUSI Channel 9 and CMEX workshops - Over 2000 related phone calls received - Over 7000 unique web site hits from around the world - Over 1500 hits on web site in July 2005 - 20,000 Official Festival Guides delivered by the Californian Newspaper - The Promenade In Temecula was nominated with an Outstanding Performance Award for regional malls in So.Cal. Festival Proceeds and donations benefit the Temecula Valley Cultural Arts and Music Center ,Operating under the umbrella of Musicians Workshop . ) " TEMECULA V ALLEY INTERNATIONAL JAZZ FESTIVAL SUMMARY OF THE EVENT 2005 The International stars included: Ernie Andrews, Richie Cole, Dick Berk, Holly Hofmann, Jeff Hamilton, Mike Wofford, Christoph Luty, Paula West, Scott Martin, Ranee Lee, Richard Ring, Rene Worst, and Jennifer Scott as well as Piotr Rodowicz and his drummer who flew in from Poland to perform. The Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival kicked on Thursday July 14th with a VIP Dinner at Baily's Front Street Bar and Grill, featuring some of Canada's Finest Jazz artists- the Jennifer Scott Trio, The music was beautiful, delicious food and fine wine served from the Temecula valley wineries, The presenting sponsors that attended, experienced a perfect night of fine dining and entertainment. On Friday July 15th another VIP, Sponsor and ticketed event was held at the beautiful estate of Dan and Beverly Stephenson's, There were about 300 people in attendance at the sit down table, out-door a1mosphere, The evening was warm and the air way filled with music, The event was catered by Delytes Catering, serving light food, and the wine was provided by the Wine Growers of Temecula Valley, Each table featured a hand-painted wine carafe that was painted by a local artist. at the end of the night each carafe was auctioned off, A very unique fimdraiser that received great response. The night was said to have a 10 star rating!!! . Saturday July 16th, at The Promenade In Temecula the days events started with the Blues Revue Band from the Musicians Workshop, then the Musicians Workshop Advanced Jazz Band wowed the crowd with their awesome talent Following came the Holly Hoffinan Quartet featuring the great world famons drummer Jeff Hamilton, The band was hot.but so was the day, and the 100% weather turned some people away. At 5:00pm Canada finest Renee Lee and friends played to a fuller house. When evening came, the sun was less intense, and the people arrived to see Richie Cole and the Alto Madness Orchestra. After the performance, Richie Cole was presented with a US Congressional Certificate of Recognition for Lifetime Achievement. The evening ended with Paula West a sensational vocalist from San Francisco, and the great Ernie Andrews. Also, on July 16th, at the Duck Pond, the grounds were transformed into an Arts & Crafts Faire, decorated with booths of handmade items. This made the venue very festive and inviting. The music started at 1 :30 with the Chuck Niles Music Award Competition- Semi Finalist Performances and ran until 9pm. At 6:30 Common' Sense, a popular San Diego Regee Band performed as the heat started to cool down. Following was Piotr Rodowicz and the Mingus Mingus Band, all the way from Poland. Ending the evening featured a high energy Latin band, Scott Martin and the Latin Soul band, During the dayS event, several hindered people attended each perfonrumce, however, the heat and the distance from the Main Stage prevented the large crowds expected. On Sunday July 17th the day stlirted at 2:00pm with the Mountain View Community Church "Voices of Praise" Gospel Chorus. Hundreds of people attended through out the day at The Promenade In Temecula. .From 4to 8pm high energy, festive sounds of gypsy Flamingo music of Bandido de Amor. This band is a favorite and also drew large crowds. , ) # Also on Sunday starting at 4pm the Piotr Rodowicz Trio, from Poland perfonned at Baily's Front Street Bar and Grill. Following with Judy Chamberlain Trio from 7 to JOpm, The festival ended with a wrap up party "an evening of jazz" held in the Eagles Nest at Pechanga Resort and Casino, featuring The Jon Laskin Band, where many of the International Stars, sat in the band through out the evening. All in all the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival was a great success, we feel the attendance would have been larger if there had not been a heat wave. The duck pond would have been more successful if there was more parking available right near the duck pond. The jazz evenings at Baily's would have been better received if there was no cover charge. We received many compliments from the Jazz Festival Musicians applauding us on the event, saying we are on the right track, musicians that have participated in Jazz Festivals around the world. We are looking forward to the 2006 festival, and plan to make some major changes that will benefit the . whole community, and make this event very successful, Jane Laskin . Jon Laskin Musicians Workshop SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE MUSICIANS WORKSHOP This Agreement, made this 25th day of April. 2006, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MUSICIANS WORKSHOP, a California nonprofit corporation, A. MUSICIANS WORKSHOP will operate the third annual 'Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival" on July 7 - 9, 2006, The Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival is a special event held at various locations within Old Town Temecula, The Festival will offer free concerts, an art faire, music and rhythm workshops and clinics with the performers, B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Presenting Sponsor" of the 2006 Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: In exchange for the payment of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), and city support costs in the amount up to $6,100, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Presenting Sponsor" of the 2006 Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. MUSICIANS WORKSHOP shall pay for all rental costs for the Ternecula Community Theater. A. In exchange for being a Presenting Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Exhibit A. B. A. The city sponsorship of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) will be used to produce the "free to the public events" and pay for the entertainment at those venues at the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. C, The Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival proceeds will be distributed as follows: 50% to Musicians Workshop 50% to The Temecula Valley Cultural Arts & Music Education Center Building Fund D, Within 60 days after conclusion of the Jazz Festival, MUSICIANS WORKSHOP shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Jazz Festival event, its attendance, media coverage, description of the materials in which the City was listed as a Title Sponsor. In addition, a complete financial statement to include a balance sheet and income statement of the Festival must be included. E. MUSICIANS WORKSHOP agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by reason of MUSICIANS WORKSHOP's acts or omissions or those of MUSICIANS WORKSHOP's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law. F. MUSICIANS WORKSHOP shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with MUSICIANS WORKSHOP and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; 1, Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. 2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. 3, Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (A) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage provided on ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 4. Minimum Limits of Insurance, Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (A) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Liquor Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 5. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival. 6, Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand. 7, Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or MUSICIANS WORKSHOP shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. G, Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by Chairperson and attest to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival, has hereunto subscribed this Contract day, month, and year hereinabove written. DATED: TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL JAZZ FESTIVAL CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jon Laskin Founder and Executive Director MUSICIANS WORKSHOP 28690 Mercedes Street Temecula, CA 92590 Ronald H. Roberts Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A Benefits As a Presenting Sponsor of the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival, The City of Temecula will receive the following comprehensive package of benefits: Logo and Exclnsivity · Presenting Sponsor designation of the "Temecula Valley International Jazz Festival" · Festival Logo and Presenting Sponsor designation may be used in sponsor's marketing and PR . Category and product exclusivity if desired. On-Site . Two (2) 10' x 10' booths in the prominent locations in Old Town Temecula to include in each booth: (Valne of $2,000) . One (1) 10' x 10' canopy . One (I) 8' table . Two (2) chairs . Signage at all Entertainment Stages - must be provided . Two (2) 2' x 8' Banners to be displayed at the event . The City ofTemecula name displayed at Information Booth . Public address announcements read on stage throughout event . NEW THIS YEAR - City of Temecula Logo on souvenir items including Festival T-shirts and wine glasses Advertising . City ofTemecula Name and Logo included in all Festival advertising . City of Temecula Name and Logo incorporated into all media releases . City of Temecula Logo on 25,000 "Official Festival Guide" Programs - distributed through The Californian Newspaper . City ofTemecula Logo on 500 event posters displayed throughout the community . City of Temecula Logo on 250 event double sided "Window Stickers" displayed throughout the community. Website · City of Temecula Logo will be prominently displayed on the Festival website with hyperlink to http://www,cityoftemecula.org/ Program · City of Temecula Logo prominently displayed on event program . Full page advertisement in event program Tickets/Passes . 30 Tickets - Pre-Festival "TITLE SPONSOR" Party (Value of $1,500) . 100 Tickets - Opening Night "Kick-Off' Party (Value of $6,500) . 30 VIP seating for both Saturday & Sunday (Value of $3,000) . 30 VIP Car Passes for preferred parking in Old Town Temecula On Friday night, July 8th, we will be hosting an opening night reception at the Old Town Temecula Theater. This "Kick-Off' Party will feature the performances by the featured performers of the event. As a Presenting Sponsor, Paradise Chevrolet / Cadillac will be provided 100 tickets to this exclusive reception, which can be given to your employees or most valued clients. In addition, those in attendance will be able to "meet & greet" with legendary jazz performers and network with other sponsors at the festival. . 2 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Attachments 2006 Premier Sponsor $35,000 (Only one Premier Sponsorship available) 1. Identification as Premier Sponsor in all Festival materials 2. Exclusivity in Premier Sponsor's field 3. Full page, color ad in Festival program 4. Inclusion of logo in all Festival print advertising 5. Announcements in all Festival paid radio and newspaper advertising 6. Sponsor representative interviewed on projected radio remote . broadcast 7. Right to use Festival logo on Premier Sponsor's materials (with Festival advance approval) 8. Representative introduced from stage and invited to speak several times during Festival 9. Four signs or banners on-site at event (Sponsor to provide) 10. Separate display tent in high-traffic area 11. Access to VIP Hospitality Tent for twenty guests 12. Linking of Premier sponsor's web site to Festival site 13. Recognized in Festival newsletter 14. Recognized in at least ten Festival news releases to general media 15. Sponsor's name in Festival brochure 16. Fifty adult Festival tickets 17. Twenty Five parking passes 18. Invitation to Sponsor Appreciation Dinner for twelve people 19. Thirty sets of Official Festival souvenir merchandise \ I QUESTIONS Application Page 3a Please respond to the following questions: Event 1. Provide information on your proposed event, goals, promotional program, budget, expected attendance, funding recipients, and location of event. U event venues area held at multiple locations, please list. Prooosed Event: The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival has sunrise hot air balloon launches, evening balloon glows, two entertainment stages and a Kids Faire. The Festival also has food, arts and crafts and commercial product vendors including local regional vendors. Over 20 Temecula wineries participate offering wine tasting. Goals: ) The mission of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival Association is to enhance the charitable, cultural, educational and economic development of the region. That mission is supported throughout the year by the Festival Board members and staff and most prominently at the annual Festival. It is important for the Festival's future to continually evolve by offering a high quality and more diverse entertainment program while increasing the attendance and national recognition of the event. To do this, we must provide a higher caliber of headline entertainment, improve our staging and sound technology, and increase our paid broadcast advertising budget. For 2006 we will be budgeting these increased expenses, while focusing on increasing our sponsorship dollars by adding a paid sponsorship salesperson. Promotional Program: Marketing for the 2006 Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival will include advertising in newspapers (media kits that include CDs of press releases and photos, hard copies of press releases and contact sheets of photos.) Additionally marketing will include commercials and promotions with radio stations from Riverside, Orange County, Los Angeles to San Diego Counties; local cable television advertisements; collateral materials (flyers and posters); and an aggressive publicity campaign targeted for Riverside, Orange County, Los Angeles to San Diego Counties; major television network news, network morning and feature news shows, West Coast magazines and Southern California newspapers. TO: City of Temecula FROM: Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival DATE: March 9, 2006 Traffic Safety Signs and Devices for Temporary Use ) . 300 Traffic Cones . 150 A Frame Barricades . 6 Barricades with "Road Closed" signs . Portable Yellow Flashing Caution units . 12 Stop signs . 4 hand-held stop/slow sign paddles . 2 portable light towers . Portable Red flashing caution units . Signs: 4 No Left, 2 No Right, 2 Merge, 12 No Parking, 6 Road Closed . Miscellaneous material: Caution tape, earplugs, gloves, etc. . Assistance in locating a vendor/contractor with portable traffic safety message boards FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Application Page 2 This Page Must Be Completed And Submitted (Based on your organization's last fiscal year) I \ i This form serves as a guideline of the financial information requested. If your organization has financial statements (balance sheet & income statement) please attach. In addition, please attach the organization's current budget for the proposed event. Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2004 Audited: Y es ~ No Assets Liabilities & Fund Balance Cash and Investments $ 367, 515 Current Payables $ 731, 871 Receivables (detail) 138.447 Inventory 7,402 Fixed Assets 3,079 Other Assets 10,089 Total Assets 526,532 Notes Payable N/A Fund Balance 338,086 Total Liabilities & Fund Balance $~526. 532 \J Event Income Statement for the Year Ended June 30, 2004 Income Expenses Fundraising $ N/A Salaries $ 80.092 Grants $ N/A Operating Expenses $ 89,700 Cash Sponsorships $ 94,500 Advertising! $107,226 In-Kind Sponsorships $ 18,050 Promotions City Funds $ 35,000 *deleted Entertainment $133,261 from cash Souvenirs $ sponsorships $113,000 44,439 Rentals Vendors $ 114,030 InsurancelPermit Fees$ 34,807 Other Sources $ 527,953 Other Expenses $ 189, 785 (Ticket/beverage sales, entry fees, parking fees, etc.) Please note with an asterisk (*) any amounts that require additional explanation, and comment on these items. \\San3\city manager\Wolnickg\Applications\E.D. Funding Program - Special Events.doc 10:51 AM 03/23/05 Accrual Basis , " I: ) Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Profit & Loss Budget Overview July 2005 through June 2006 Jul '05 - Jun 06 f ) Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4100. Sponsor Income 4150' Program sales 4200 . Admissions income 4220 . Outside ticket sales 4230 ' RV tlckeisales 4235 . Friday admissions 4240 . Saturday ticket sales 4250 . Sunday ticket sales 4260 . Vans Ticket Sales 4270 ' Longs Ticket Sales 4280 . Vendor Discount Ticket Sales Total 4200 . Admissions income 4300 . Balloon Income 4320 . Corporate balloons Total 4300 . Balloon Income 4400 . Beverage income 4415. BeerlWlne 4430 . Ice Total 4400 . Beverage Income 4500 . Commercial court income 4510 ' Entry fees Total 4500 . Commercial court income 4600 . Food court income 4610 . Entry fees Total 4600 . Food court income 4650 . Parking income 4655 ' Kids Fare 4658 . Entry Fees Total 4655 . Kids Fare 4700 . Souvenir income 4810 . RV Commission 4900 . Arts and crafts income 4910 . Entry fees Total 4900 . Arts and crafts income 1 B,500,OO 1 B,500.00 . 906,160,00 1B1,OOO.00 1,260.00 10,000.00 33,000,00 29,BOO,OO 145,000.00 43,500.00 36,000.00 20,000,00 1,000.00 31B,300.00 1,700.00 1,700,00 200,000,00 2,000.00 202,000,00 63,000.00 63,000,00 35,000.00 35,000,00 32,000.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 50,000,00 1,900.00 Total Income Expense 5000 . Operating expense 5010. Bank charges and fees 5012. Credit Card Charges/Fees 5015. Copy machine ~025 . Dues 5030 . Equipment repairs 5035. Insurance-liability 5045 . Lease 1 rent 5048 . Utilltes 5056 ' Mileage 5060 . Postage 5065' Printing 5070 . Seminars & travel 5072 . Travel Expenses 50BO . Supplies 50B2 . Taxes 5085 . Telephone / office expense Total 5000 . Operating expense 250,00 3,400.00 2,700.00 2,500.00 350.00 27,000,00 20,400.00 2,400.00 700.00 5,000.00 2,000,00 5.000.00 3,500.00 5,000.00 1 B,OOO.OO 5,000,00 103,200.00 fQ)~~[Fu Page 1 10:51 AM 03/23/05 /,~ccrual Basis ( ) Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Profit & Loss Budget Overview July 2005 through June 2006 Jul '05 - Jun 06 ( ) 5100 . Payroll expense 5110. Wages 5115 . Bonus & Commlsions 5125 . Employee benefit 5130' Workman's compensation 5135. Temporary Staffing Total 5100. Payroll expense 5200 . Board expense 5210' Supplies 5220 . Meetings 5230 ' Shirts Total 5200 . Board expense 5300 . Donation expense 5310. M.H.S. Baseball Program 5320 . Volunteer Fire Dept. 5330 ' High SchoollTrash Detail Total 5300 . Donation expense 5400 . Command expense 5410' Food & beverages 5430 ' Radios 5440 . Supplies 5450 . Telephone Total 5400 . Command expense 5500 ' Facilities 5515. Fencing 5520 . Fuel 5525 ' Electrical 5530 . Golf carts 5535 . Light towers 5550 . RV's & modulars 5555 . Signage 5560 . Equipment rental 5565 . Storage bins 5570 ' Supplies 5575 . Tents 55BO ' Toilets 55B5 . Trash/Clean-Up Total 5500 . Facilities 5700 . Marketing expense 5716 . Flyers/Rack Cards 5722 . Media Kits 5725 . Marketing expense-other 5730 . Marketing supplies 5732 . Postage 5735 . Print marketing 5740 ' Program 5745 . Radio 5750 . Marketing Finn 5757 . Web-Site 5760 . Video Production 5762 . Television 5765 . Assorted Services 5770 . Newsletters Total 5700 . Marketing expense 3.500.00 2,000.00 1,000,00 500,00 1,000,00 4,000,00 14,000.00 60,000.00 27,000.00 3,600.00 650,00 6,500.00 2,500,00 2,500,00 12B,750.00 55,000.00 2,000.00 2,700.00 15,000.00 21,000.00 95,700,00 100.00 1,500.00 310.00 1,910.00 B,OOO.OO 3,000.00 3,500,00 14,500,00 1,700.00 1,500.00 400,00 1,BOO,OO 5,400,00 12,000.00 2.000.00 22,000.00 12,000,00 14,500,00 6,000.00 2,500.00 4,000.00 2,500.00 300.00 22,000,00 12,000,00 B,OOO,OO 119,BOO,OO [Q)fPJ~fF1r Page 2 10:51 AM 03/23/05 ~ccrual Basis \ ) Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Profit & Loss Budget Overview July 2005 through June 2006 ) 5800 . Professional fees 5B10' Accounting 5B20 . Auditing 5B50 . Attorney 5860 . Sponsorship Commissions Total 5800 . Professional fees 5900 . Public safety 5910' Highway patrol 5920 . Security 5940 . Sheriffs 5950 . Supplies Total 5900 . Public safety 6000 . Sponsor expense 6040 . Sponsor Awards 6045 ' Sponsor NlghtlThank You Total 6000 . Sponsor expense 6100. Volunteer 6110' Food 6120, T-shirts 6130. Printing 6135' Meeting Room (s) Total 6100 . Volunteer 6200 . Admissions expense 6210. County fee - parking 6215 . County fees ~ tickets 6220 ' Entry refund 6270 . Ticket printing Total 6200 . Admissions expense 6300 . Balloon expense 6310. Accomodations 6320 . Showaup incentives 6340 . Fuel 6390 . Tethered balloons Total 6300 . Balloon expense 6400 . Beverage expense 6410. ABC license 6415. Beer 6420 . Beverage supplies 6435 . Ice Total 6400 . Beverage expense 6600 . Entertainment expense 6610. Entertainment Backline 6620 ' Producer/Booking Agent 6700 . Main backstage supplies 6710 . Accommodations 6730 . Food 6770 ' Sound & Lights 67BO ' Stages Total 6700 ' Main backstage supplies 6900 . Entertainer acts 6910 . Kids Faire 6920 . Main stage 6930 . Wine stage Total 6900 ' Entertainer acts Total 6600 . Entertainment expense Jul '05 - Jun 06 7,000,00 3,500,00 5,000.00 5,000.00 20,500.00 2,200.00 32,000.00 22,000,00 500.00 56,700.00 6,000,00 3,400.00 9.400,00 2,BOO,OO 2,200.00 1,200.00 600.00 6,BOO.00 7,500.00 12,500.00 250,00 2,400,00 22,650.00 7,000.00 3,000,00 2,500,00 3,000.00 15,500.00 300.00 12,000,00 1,000,00 5,300.00 1 B,600.00 5,000,00 15,000.00 B,OOO,OO 4,000.00 15,000.00 20,000.00 47,000,00 3,200.00 130,000.00 5,000.00 13B.200,OO 205,200.00 [Q)[Rl~~1l Page 3 10:51 AM 03/23/05 ~ ,._~ccrual Basis \ ) ) Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Profit & Loss Budget Overview July 2005 through June 2006 Jul '05 . Jun 06 7300 . Food court expense 7340 . Health Permit Total 7300 . Food court expense 7500 . Parking 7510' Supplies 7520 . Cones Total 7500 . Parking 7600 . Souvenir expense 7620 . Inventory purchases 7640 . Supplies Total 7600 . Souvenir expense 7700 . VIP expense 7720 . Food 7740 . Supplies Total 7700 . VIP expense 7800 . Wine tasting venue expense 7810. Glasses - plastic 7B15' Glasses -tasting 7B60 ' Tickets 7870 . Wine Total 7800 . Wine tasting venue expense 1,500.00 1,500.00 250.00 600.00 B50,OO 2B,OOO.00 250.00 2B,250,OO 4,000.00 600,00 4,600.00 400,00 7,400,00 550.00 3B,OOO.00 46,350.00 Total Expense 906,160.00 Net Ordinary Income Net Income [D)[Rl~rFiJ 0.00 0.00 Page 4 H~/4Ad WOrkS,lnC. PUBliC RElaTIONS AND MARKETING Marketing Report Temecula Valley Balloon &Wine Festival July 2005 PUBLICITY OVERVIEW: The 2005 Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival publicity and marketing campaign began in October 2004. The process began with local publicity on vendors, volunteers and awards. Long lead publicity started in January with calendar notices, targeting over 100 entertainment, in-flight travel and regional publications, as well as a list of travel writers. Target subject related magazines such as Wine Enthusiast, Vineyard and Winery Magazine and Tours and Tastings were sent press releases that focused on the wine tasting portion of our event, while entertainment magazines and travel magazines focused on the balloons and entertainment aspects of the Festival. In March, an aggressive push to obtain maximum print and broadcast media exposure started with over 90 custom book marks produced and sent to entertainment editors, concert hot lines, travel writers, newspaper editors, television news producers and television news anchors. The bookmarks listed some of the entertainment and to watch for the complete line up. Television news feature editors and reporters also received advanced notice of May media days in Temecula. Local Monthly publications also received calendar notices, stories on balloon charters, photo proof sheets and the Friday headliner in March. In April, a small jigsaw puzzle of the Festival's 2005 souvenir poster was mailed with scroll invitations to 20 television news producers and anchors inviting them to a private wine country tour, tasting and balloon flight. A puzzle, full size poster and PSA were also sent to major morning networks. Weekly and daily newspapers received monthly news releases beginning in January. Six weeks prior to the event the same publications received different weekly press releases that included entertainment lineup news, winery news, balloon reservation and volunteer news. Press kits with all articles, entertainment schedules, photos and a CD with all information were assembled and mailed four weeks prior to the event. These were mailed with hand cut and punched invitations to the Friday, June 3 media preview. 21705 COMO STREET .:. WILDOMAR .:. CA .:. 92595 (951) 678-1456 .:. (951) 252-5649 .:. FAX (951) 678-5467 WEBSITE WWW.TEMECULACALlFORNIA.COM Hdc4'4 Ad Works, Inc. PUBliC RElaTIONS AND MARKETING RESULTS: The Festival had more coverage in wine publications than previous years, more magazines, and more daily metro newspapers. In many cases the Festival received two to six page spreads detailing the entire schedule. Over 7 million print impressions of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival in regional, national and local publications publicized the Festival with stories and accompanying photos. TELEVISION: Our media preview and private invitation yielded three television news segments - Two, which appeared on KCAL-Los Angeles and CBS-Los Angeles the week before the Festival, and one segment that appeared on the Caballero network - La Nuestra. The value of these spots estimated at $8,653 worth of advertising. Media that covered our Friday preview included a live broadcast with KTLA-WB's Gayle Anderson, flying in a hot air balloon over the Festival. This was valued at $5600 other media covering the event included newspaper, radio and local television with eight representatives covering the media flights. The Festival also received coverage from KABC Los Angeles, KGTV San Diego (ABC affiliate), Today Show/NBC, and KNSD - NBC San Diego coverage. KGTV had an in- studio interview of a Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival executive while KNSD had a live grape stomping demonstration, and demo on hot air balloons in front of their studios in San Diego. Total Hits: Audience reach: Media Value: 27 6,170,483 $50,394 21705 COMO STREET .) WILDOMAR .;. CA .;. 92595 (951) 678-1456 .;. (951) 252-5649 .;. FAX (951) 678-5467 WEBSITE WWW.TEMECULACALlFORNIA.COM "II QUESTIONS (2007) Application Page 3c County Sheriffs, California Highway Patrol, County Transportation and the City of Temecula. 4. Please describe your rmancial reporting. The Festival Office works with a Certified Public Accountant year round and uses generally accepted accounting principles. All fmancial reporting is prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and reflects all significant receivables, payables and other liabilities. 5. If your organization received City of Temecula Funding in the previous year, please provide a brief recap of the event, attendance, accomplishments and its economic benefit to Temecula. Explain if the event, goals, marketing program, and attendance were consistent with what was proposed to the City. Event Recap: ~ The 2005 Event was the 22nd Annual Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. After a very successfu12l't annual celebration and increased attendance it was a challenge to continue to meet the increasing attendance with a similar budget and initiate new activities to increase and continue interest in the Festival. To ensure media response another very aggressive multi-media campaign that would appeal to print, radio and television news media was undertaken for 2005, This resulted in news coverage throughout the nation including major markets in Miami, Chicago, New York, Dallas, Denver and San Francisco. The Festival website which carries event information and entertainment schedules was linked to radio and television stations covering the Festival. In 2005, the website hit count doubled in both May and June over the previous 2004 record- breaking year. Through a cross channel sponsorship with Adelphia, the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival received over 300 thirty-second commercials per week for three weeks on cable networks broadcasting in Los Angeles County, South Orange County and the Inland Empireffemecula area Early morning balloon rides including some special shape balloons started the Festival day on Saturday and Sunday at 6:00 a.m. as riders floated over vineyards and surrounding areas. ( \.. // /Y ,0;/ //. ,f/ / .~ QUESTIONS 2007 Application Page 3d In addition to the traditional evening Balloon Glows, a Laser Light Show at the Main Stage, highlighted the festivities on Friday and Saturday evenings. Adjacent to the stage was a 60-foot sphere illuminated with lasers and accompanied by music. Twenty-one different wineries provided tasting in the wine venue, which also set a Festival record. Throughout the day, various entertainers provided music on the Wine Stage for the enjoyment of Festival guests. The Main Stage was rocking as several bands provided music in the afternoon and evenings. Guests also enjoyed the vendor booths including, arts and crafts, commercial exhibits and delicious food. To thank the military, Sunday was designated military day and all active military received 50% off their adult admission. Attendance DemolZfaohics: Please see attached. Accomolishments: .--.. \..,~ Festival accomplishments have been integrated throughout the narrative in this document. Economic Benefit to City of Temecula: The Festival provided key economic development activities for the City of Temecula and surrounding areas in the Temecula Valley. It prominently displayed the natural assets and resources of Temecula including its: 1) tourism, 2) retail operations, 3) potential for employment opportunities, 4) industriaVcommerciallocations, and the fact that Temecula is a leading source of high tech job potential, excellent residential living and quality oflife. The activities of the Balloon and Wine Festival generated substantial TOT tax to the city since all hotels/motels, campgrounds, and restaurants in the city were at maximum capacity during the three-day event. Ninety-two percent of Festival operating expenses continued to be spent at Temecula Valley businesses. '. ~_)J ADVERTISING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION This Agreement, made this 25th day of April. 2006, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as ("TVBWFA"). A. TVBWFA will operate the "Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival" on June 2 - 4, 2006, The Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival is a special event located at Lake Skinner featuring approximately 50 hot air balloons, main stage entertainment, arts and crafts fair, tethered balloon rides and a wine venue featuring the Temecula Valley. On June 2dn, the Festival will kick-off with headline entertainment and a balloon glow. Attendance in previous years has been approximately 30,000 - 40,000 people for the 3-day event. Attendance for the 2005 Festival was approximately 38,000. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a Premier Sponsor of the 2006 Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. In exchange for the payment of $35,000.00 and for providing temporary logistical support of traffic control signs and devices to assist with public safety during the event, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Premier Sponsor" of the 2006 Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. In exchange for being a Premier Sponsor, the City of Temecula will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A. B. Any media visits prior to the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival coordinated by the Festival or its public relations representatives will include an invitation to visit all Temecula entities (i.e. Old Town, wineries, golf). Secondly, the Festival shall include in its basic press kit a feature article of no less than two pages, which focuses on the attractions of Temecula, including Old Town, golf, wineries, etc. This informational piece shall be provided to all media working with the Festival or its representatives on Festivai-related stories. C. The TVBWFA shall submit a written request to the Assistant City Manager and the Director of Public Works requesting the use of any City owned light towers, cones, barricades, directional signs, flashing beacons, etc. no later than 60 days proceeding the first day of the Balloon & Wine Festival. Any such materials provided are at the discretion of the City of Temecula and shall be returned in the same condition as received. D. All event tickets, parking passes and official Festival souvenir merchandise shall be submitted to the City Manager no later than one full week proceeding the first day of the Festival. E. Within 90 days following the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival, TVBWFA shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival event, its attendance/demographics, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a Premier Sponsor. The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format. In addition, a complete financial statement to include a balance sheet and income statement of the Festival must be included. F. TVBWFA agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or property by reason of TVBWFA's acts or omissions or those of TVBWFA's emploYees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law. G. TVBWFA shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TVBWFA and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; 1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. 2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. 3. Provide the following minimum limits: (A) General Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. (B) Liquor Liability: $2,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival. 5. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand. 6. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees or TVBWFA shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. H, Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled, I. rvBWA shall promptly furnish the City, a financial review of the TVBWA financial statements by an independent certified public accountant, which will include FY July 1, 2005- June 30, 2006, by December 31, 2006. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. DATED: TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & WINE ASSOCIATION CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Carol Popejoy Ronald H. Roberts Executive Director Mayor Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival Assoc. P.O. Box 1254 Temecuia, CA 92593 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A c '\) LAcJ1,~ ~~ << ~ ~ 2006 Premier Sponsor $35,000 (Only one Premier Sponsorship available) 1. Identification as Premier Sponsor in all Festival materials 2. Exclusivity in Premier Sponsor's field 3. Full page, color ad in Festival program 4. Inclusion of logo in all Festival print advertising 5. Announcements in all Festival paid radio and newspaper advertising 6. Sponsor representative interviewed on projected radio remote broadcast 7. Right to use Festival logo on Premier Sponsor's materials (with Festival advance approval) 8. Representative introduced from stage and invited to speak several times during Festival 9. Four signs or banners on-site at event (Sponsor to provide) 10. Separate display tent in high-traffic area 11. Access to VIP Hospitality Tent for twenty guests 12. Linking of Premier sponsor's web site to Festival site 13. Recognized in Festival newsletter 14. Recognized in at least ten Festival news releases to general media 15. Sponsor's name in Festival brochure 16. Fifty adult Festival tickets 17. Twenty Five parking passes 18. Invitation to Sponsor Appreciation Dinner for twelve people 19. Thirty sets of Official Festival souvenir merchandise Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Attachments - - - - - - 'NT FII.M ---.^ V' TEMECULA v ALL E Y - ERNATIONAl & MUSIC FESIIVAL CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS . Recognition of the City of Temecula's sponsorship in all festival collateral materials · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all applicable broadcast and print media advertising, Festival fliers, brochures and signage. · Acknowledgment of City of Temecula's sponsorship prior to and after every film screening, live music performances, workshops and panel discussions. . Full page, black and white inside Cover Page Advertisement in the Festival Program. · 20 tickets to Opening Night, 20 tickets to the Awards Gala & 20 tickets to MusicFest . 20 Sponsors Passes for access to all screenings, workshops/panels, Hospitality Suite, and all filmmaker/music artists receptions . 50 film screening, MusicFest & workshops/panels tickets for giveaway to City employees, . Access to TVIFF VIP Hospitality Suite . Invitation to TVIFF VIP Pre-Awards Gala Meet and Greet Cocktail Reception. . Hyperlink from the Film Festival website to the City's website. . Prominent City of T emecula logo/name placement in the festival Website and Sponsor Display boards. · Presenting opportunities for City of Temecula officials and staff in various Festival components (from presenters to hosts/hostesses in all prime festival special events). As Host City, the City of Temecula will always be acknowledged as a cooperative entity in the event titling regardless of who, if any, the eventual Presenting or Title Sponsor will be. The Festival will secure from a good and responsible company or companies, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of the event a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City of Temecula is named insured or as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with the Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival. Coverage will provide the following minimum limits: . General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. . Liquor Liability - $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. - - - - - - INTERNATIONAL FIl.M & MUSIC FESTIVAL ~.. TEMECU LA VALLEY Marketing Strategy Campaign for 2006 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival TVIFF's marketing goals for 2006 are: . To increase event awareness and attendance specifically with the continually changing demographic population of Temecula and its surrounding communities and . To raise TVIFF's profile to a higher level and expand its media reach to a broad Southern California audience and potentially, national audience. To achieve these goals, TVIFF has successfully negotiated with the public relations firm of Shepley, Winings, Diamond Public Relations (SWD PR) of Studio City to come on board and manage TVIFF's publicity and media relations. SWD PR's film and music industry contacts solid relationships with national and regional consumer and trade media will bring a smart, strategic sensibility to TVIFF"s media relations efforts and help craft a higher profile and expanded media reach for TVIFF. They will do this through heavy outreach to print and electronic (television and radio) outlets, as well as online. SWD PR will have one of SWD PR company principals as well as an Account executive working with TVIFF. In addition, they intend to have some level of staff in attendance at the Festival to capitalize on media who attend the Festival. SWD PR has conducted successful publicity campaigns for hundreds of television shows including: CSI, The Practice, Alias. Emeril, Ally McBeal, to name a few. They are the agency of record for MSNBC, Turner Network Television, SOAPnet, The Tennis Channel, Mervyn's, Advanta Corp (Mastercard), Target Stores, USA Network, Showlime's Odyssey 5. They handle regularly publicity campaigns for Paramount Network and Domestic Television, CBS Productions, Universal Studios Pay per View, NBC, Twentieth Century Fox, Sony Pictures Television, Sony Imageworks, David E. Kelly Productions, PBS and Disney. Other Marketino Alliances TVIFF will be working closely with the. Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau (TVCVB) and combine resources to aggressively market the festival. In addition, TVCVB will help establish processes for measuring the cultural, educational and economic impact of the festival to the City of Temecula and surrounding communities. The Convention and Visitors Bureau will work to craft an attractive travel and hotel package for our participating filmmakers and music artists and attendees coming from out of town. In our Notice of Acceptances to selected filmmakers and music artists, TVIFF will include a welcome letter from the Convention and Visitors Bureau informing them of different tourist-related activities they can do when they arrive in Temecula. They will also provide the Festival with 'introduction to Temecula' collateral pieces such as Visitors' Guides, maps, discount and gilt certificates our participants and guests can use during their visit. Another exciting Temecula-based alliance we have secured is with the Temecula Valley Woman's Club. The Woman's Club has established a Film Festival Committee primarily to help community wide awareness of the festival and generate participation and attendance. They have committed to talk to different clubs and organizations and Activities Directors of various senior citizen communities to include the Festival in their calendar as a prime event they need to attend. The Temecula Valley Woman's Club has also committed to host the Festival's Hospitality Suite. Marketin!! support from Paramount Studios. Paramount Studios has extended an invitation to TVIFF to organize live TV taping audience and focus groups. For its audience organizing efforts, TVIFF will have an opportunity to distribute TVIFF information materials at these studio tapings. Update: TVIFF and Temecula Valley Woman's Club coordinated the first fundraising trek to Paramount Studios, March 24, 2006. Paradise Chevrolet-Enterprise Rent A Car provided transportation. The Temecula group was welcomed prior to the taping of the show. Then members of the Temecula Group participated in the entertainment segments in betwe,en takes. TVIFF received from Paramount, $450,00. But more important than the money, TVIFF as an event and Temecula as a City are mentioned several times during the taping before an audience of over 300. TVIFF is scheduled for three more taping sessions. MvSpace.com TVIFF will utilize and maximize to the fullest the strength and reach of the festival's new on line media/promotional partner, MySpace.com. MvSoace.com aenerates 15 million hits a dav. As a TVIFF Sponsor, MsSpace.com will place the festival banner on the MySpace Film Focus page and will provide promotion opportunities on several of its other site locations, i.e. "MySpace Specials" placement, in rotation, on their Main Home Page. MySpace.com has also committed to provide a 'featured film' opportunity on the Film Focus platform to one or more of the Festival's Film Competition winners. Sonicbids.com- and WithoutaBox.com are TVIFF"s current on line submissions partner for both film and music entries. Both entities' strength and breadth in terms of worldwide reach are phenomenal. They will provide effective internet cross promotional opportunities for the Festival. Local and regional efforts will be made via our other media partners, which include: Press Enterprise for Riverside County-wide saturation; North County Times/Californian for Southwest Riverside and North San Diego county-wide saturation and area radio stations, KATY, 101.3, KMYT 94.5, KTMQ, 1490Am Smooth Jazz and Classic Rock station, KTMQ, Q103.3 for primarily Riverside County radio audience reach. Direct Mail and Syndication Wires, fee-based wires will be utilized and major trade, tour, travel and national publications for feature stories and calendar listings will be aggressively approached for national and international media reach. Additional info vou miaht want to add in vour report: AWARDS . Distinguished Institution Award to be offered to the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, KODAK and Technicolor. . Acting honors to be offered to: Meg Ryan, John Lithgow, Jodie Foster, Christopher Plummer, Sally Field, Goldie Hawn, Kurt Russell, Christopher Walken, Tommy Lee Jones, Jackie Chan, Halle Berry, John Travolta, Michael Keaton, Jim Carrey, Steve Martin. . Directing honors to be offered to Martha Coolidge, Steven Soderbergh, Sam Mendes, John Woo, Quentin Tarantino, Ron Howard . Producing honors to be offered to Gale Ann Hurd, Amy Pascal, Joel Silver, Tony Scott . Music Artist /Composing/ Producing honors to be offered to Diane Warren, Lionel Ritchie, Dolly Parton, Randy Travis, Sheryl Crow. . The Creation of The Mayor's Visionary Award- to be presented to an individual whose vision and persistence of vision have made a significant mark in the film and music industry. The inaugural honor will be offered to: Music MogulNisionary - Clive Davis and Berry Gordy. CLUBHOUSE KIDS TVIFF has finished post production on this magazine-variety television show for children and will schedule to screen it at the Festival. TVIFF hopes this show, which was produced locally using area production and performing talents, will spur our Film/Music Education series initiative designed to encourage and providing a mentoring, supportive and professional environment for local Temecula Valley aspiring filmmakers and musicians. The TVIFF Film/Music Camp for Aspirina Filmmakers and Musicians Although this project has had its challenges, TVIFF is continuing to pursue to get this project off the ground by end of 2006, in time for a 2007 launch. This s a series of three 7 -day film/music camp where participants learn the elements of music and filmmaking process from film and music industry professional. Students between the ages of 9-13 are the primary target population. The objectives are for the filmmaking students to write, produce, shoot, edit and score film for presentation at the Festival's closing day. For aspiring musicians, the goal is write, record and perform original music for presentation at the Festival's Closing day. The TVIFF Student Scholarship Award As in past years, TVIFF will award two $1,000 scholarships to a Temecula Valley graduating senior who aspire to pursue higher education and have expressed intent to work in any of the related industry categories: Music, film, video or multimedia. Requirements include Temecula Valley residency, a 3.0 GPA and an essay. 2005 recipients are Temecula students, Christa Rowers and Jared Lansford. ~. TEMECU LA VALLEY 2006 TVIFF BUDGET (Revised) EXPENSES Festival Marketing Printing Graphics Design Signage Merchandise Promo Trailer MusicFest CD Production and Replication PR/Media Relations/Marketing (LA & Beyond) Festival Program Writer/Editor Publicity/Advertising Festival Operations Office Rent Theater Rental Video Projection Equipment Rental Transportation Limousines AirFare Cargo Vanfrruck Sound/Lighting Systems Rental Party Equipment Rentals Mailing/Shipping/Film Print Freight Office Supplies/Computer/Copying Expenses Accommodations Security Telephone Website Hosting/Maintenance Trophies/Plaques/Certificates Insurance Hospitality Suite $ 6,000 $ 3,500 $ 2,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,500 $1,000 $ 15,000 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 $7,800.00 $10,000 $6,000 $5,000 $5,000 $500 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $2,000 $3,000 $2,000 $4,000 $1,000 $1,000 $3,000 $1,000 Sub Total: $56,000 Sub Total: $66,300.00 2006 TVIFF Budget, page 2 Special Events Opening Night $1,500' Awards Gala Night $45,000' Closing Wrap Party $1,500' Media Day $1,000' TalenVPerformance Fees $3,000' Sub Total: 52,000 'Festival wi/I make every effort to have these special events underwritten Festival Staff/Administrative Expenses Festival Director $20,000 Film Programming Director $5,000 Sponsorship Development $3,500 Technical Operations Director $2,500 MusicFest Coordination $2,500 Special Events Coordination $2,500 Projectionist $2,000 Scholarships $2,000 Box Office / Volunteers Coordination $1,500 Film Print/Traffic Coordination $1,000 Bookeeping Services $1,000 Miscellaneous/Contingency $5,000 Loan Reimbursements' $17,000' Sub Total: $65,500 Total Festival Expense Budget: $239,800.00 'Loan: Reimbursements spread over 3 years __Gt:^ V TEMECULA VALLEY 2006 TVIFF BUDGET (Revised) Projected Income Sponsorships (cash) General Admissions (5 screenings, 6 screens, 4 days @$7, avg, 25 attendees) $175,000" $ 21,000 Opening Night (150 paid Tix @$25) $3,750 Awards Gala (300 paid tix @$95) $28,500 Entry Fees ( Film 1 Music: 300 paid @ $25/100 @ $10-student entry) $8,500 All Day Film Pass (100 paid lix, 4 days @ $15) Festival Pass (50 paid tix @$175) $6,000 $8,750 Workshops Pass (200 paid lix @ $15) $3,000 Merchandise IT -shirts/Mugs/hats/Programs) $3,000 Total Projected Cash Sponsorships and Sales: Less Event Expenses: $257,500.00 $239 800.00 PROJECTED NET PROCEEDS: $17,700.00 "includes City sponsorship. ~- TEMECULA VALLEY F~ST.'VA~ HIGHLIC;.HTS, FACTSANP Fll1URES .. . The200511thAnnual TemeculaNalley International Film & Music Festival. opened and closed on a high note. Significant highlights of the 2005 event include: 800 film submissions, 189 of which were selected and screened. The Music Competition received over 275 entries, of which 12 were selected as the 2005 TVIFF Top Music Artists Over 300 filmmakers, musicians, producer, directors, writers, judges, workshop presenters, cast and crew from as far as China, Russia and as close as our neighbor communities of Corona, Hemet and San Diego were on hand to participate in the festivities. Attendance topped over 10,000. ) Film and music entries were accepted for the first time using high tech, streamlined and more efficient on line services of Sonicbids.com (for Music) and Without A Box (for Films). Opening Night Film had to be screened in two theaters. The 2005 Opening Night film for the first time had real 'star' power draw with the attendance of Mary Steenburgen and her husband, popular TV star, Ted Danson of 'Cheers' and 'Becker' fame. Also in attendance were its producers, director and some 20 cast and crew members. Ms.. Steenburgen was presented with a Lifetime Achievement Award prior to the screening of the film. The creators, producers, directors and animators of such blockbusters as Lion King, Fantasia, Lilo and Stich, Little Mermaid, 102 Dalmatians, The Simpsons, Rugrats, etc., participated with a panel on Animation aptly titled: The Magic of Animated Disney, For two hours they shared their expertise with our attendees DISNEYTOON STUDIOS ANIMATION SHOWCASE featured: MICKEY, DONALD, AND GOOFY IN THE THREE MUSKETEERS, L1LO & STITCH 2; STITCH HAS A GLITCH; LION KING 1 Yz and POOH'S HEFFALUMP MOVIE. The Inaugural Distinguished Institution Award was awarded for the first time to the American Film Institute. The attendance of Jean Picker Firstenberg, AFI's long time CEO and Director to personally accept the award on behalf of AFI is a huge accomplishment and compliment for Temecula, The first ever' Tribal Gift Exchange' ceremony by two tribal leaders, Sakinu, leader of the Paiwan Tribe of China and Mark Macarro, Tribal leader of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Sakinu was on hand to promote the screening of the film, THE SAGE HUNTER, which was based on his life and his aboriginal Paiwan tribe in China. The movie's HongKong based producers attended the event. The participation of filmmakers from Orange County's 's California Conservatory of the Arts, Idyllwild Arts Academy, Chapman University, Kansas Film Connection and Kansas' Independent Film Coalition" India Shorts, Ten Films (India) and Superfilmes of Brazil, in addition to the return participation of Toronto Int'I Film. Festival and Film Circuit group (Canada), The Rome Independent Film Festival (ITALY) , AFI and USC School of Cinema and Television made for a very impressive' roster of film showcases. Award Honorees ) ,Leonard Martin, Honoree/Film Critic and Author, Lifetime; Steve Dorff, Honoree/Film Composer, Lifetime; John Badham, Honoree/Director, Lifetime; Rick Schroder, Honoree/Actor, Outstanding; Natasha Hentsridge, Honoree/Actress, Outstanding; Lucas Foster, Honoree/Producer, Outstanding; The American Film Institute, recipient of the inaugural Distinguished Institution Award; Jean Picker Firstenberg, CEO and Director of AFI, accepted on behalf of AFI. A full roster of celebrity guests and presenters joined the glamorous night Actor Dorian Harewood, Awards Presentation Host, Actress, Donna Pescow (Saturday Night Fever, Angie), Actor, Robert Forster (Jackie Brown), BMI Songwriter, Bobby Tomberlin (Diamond Rio's One More Day), Screenwriter, Ted Griffin (Ocean's Eleven, Rumor Has It, Best Laid Plans), Actress, Roma Maffia (NiplTuck, Law & Order), Actress, Ally Sheedy (The original Brat Pack - St. Elmo's Fire, Breakfast Club, Short Circuit, War Games) all attended as Presenters for our 2006 honorees. Live entertainment performances featured: Area performing talents led by the Musicians Workshop, American Idol's AJ GiI, Crystal, Floor Plan Krew, On Being Human, Four Way Free, Madrepore, Rebekah Jordan, Farah Zala, Hayley Gene, The Los Angeles Youth Ballet Theater, Theatrics Dance Company, DGC 2 The JUry Award Winners THE GRAND PRIZE WINNER - BEST OF THE FEST 'The Fix' DirectorlProducer, Adam Kane, USA, BEST ACTOR, Robert Patrick - 'The Fix', BEST DIRECTOR, Adam Kane - 'The Fix', BEST SCREENPLAY, Jonny Hirshbein - 'The FIX' THE FUJIFILM STOCK AWARD, Adam Kane - 'The Fix' BEST DOCUMENTARY, 'The Loss of Nameless Things' Director: Bill Rose, USA EST SHORT DOCUMENTARY, 'Road To Kosovo' Director: James Saldana, USA BEST FOREIGN FILM, 'Dual Citizen' Director, Christy Garland, CANADA BEST FEATURE, 'My Big Fat Independent Movie' Director, Phillip ZIotorynsky BEST ANIMATION, 'Milton Is A Sh*tbag' WriterlProducerJDirector, Courtney Davis, USA, BEST STUDENT FILM, 'Chaos Theory' Director/WriterlProducer, Suny Behar, USAAJCLA BEST ACTRESS, Anna Ardova - 'The Huntei', Moscow, Russia BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY,'La Cerca,"Columbla University, ProducerlDirector SJ Main SPECIAL JURY PRIZE - SHORT LITTLE TERRORIST, India, Writerl Directorl Producer: Ashvin Kumar; CAMERA, Canada, David Cronenberg, Director; LimE DICKIE, Canada, Director, Anita McGee SPECIAL FESTIVAL AWARD, The Maggi Allen Filmmaker Award, "The Goal' Produced, Written and Directed by Daria Rae ) The Audience Choice Award Winners IndieFllx, the newest distribution marketplace for independent films, joins TVIFF this year sponsoring cash prizes to the TVIFF Audience Choice Award winners for Best Feature Film ($1,000) Best Documentary ($500), Best Animation ($250), Best Short Film ($250) and Best Student Film ($250). BEST STUDENT FILM: CHAOS THEORY, WriterJDirector Suny Behar BEST ANIMATION: HANDSHAKE, ProducerJDirector, Patrick Smith, USA BEST SHORT: SMART CARD, ProducerJDirector, James Oxford, USA BEST FEATURE: FALLING, ProducerJDirector/Writer, Clayton Allis, USA BEST DOCUMENTARY: Choppertown: The Sinners, WriterlProducerJDirectors: Scott DiLalla & Zack Coffman, USA BEST FOREIGN FILM: Dual Citizen, (from Canada), Director, Christy Garland TWO-DAY MUSIC FEST This year's Music Critique Panelists include an impressive roster of music industry professionals, Heading that list is this year's TVIFF Lifetime Achievement Honoree and three-time Grammy nominee, Composer, Steve Dorff, Art Ford, President, June S1. Entertainment and former . BMG Music Publishing film and television music marketing VP, Review Editor, A&R Reporter and Feature Writer of Music Connection Magazine, Bernard Baur, Co- Founder and Director of the Los Angeles Songwriters Showcase, Author, Journalist, 3 Interviewer and Educator, John Braheny, Tim Sweeney, President of his own successful management company international best selling author, Tim Sweeney's Guide to Releasing Independent Records and Bruce Singer, Owner/Publisher and Editor of Entertainment Roundup The featured music artists are: BRANDON SiLVEIRA (Country) of Hanford, CA; HAYLEY GENE (Pop) of Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; ZACH BROCK (Jazz) of Chicago, IL; FARAH ZALA (Pop) of Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada; BRANDON PATTON (Acoustic) of Brooklyn, New York; REBEKAH JORDAN (Pop) from Cleveland, OH, now in Santa Monica, CA; BOBBY BREAKDOWN (Rock) of Murrieta, CA,; MEZKLAH (Latin Alternative) of Los Angeles, CA; SPOOKY JONES (Rock) of Murrieta, CA; MADREPORE (Alternative) of Los Angeles, CA; ANA LOVE LIS (Pop) of Winnetka, CA and FOUR WAY FREE (Adult Contemporary) of Los Angeles, CA ) NINE WorkshoD Panels & Seminars: Film and Music producers, directors, and writers shared their knowledge and expertise with festival attendees on various subjects such as Writing, Directing, Producing, Marketing, and Distribution. It was a whole weekend of EDUCATION AND INSPIRATION: "CONVERSATIONS WITH Actor/Singer, Dorian Harewood: FROM BROADWAY TO BLACKJACK;" HOW TO GET A MOVIE PRODUCED With Producer, Zachary Feuer "BEFORE AND AFTER - HOLLYWOOD MAKE UP SECRETS, with Makeup Artist, Christina Smith; THE MAGIC OF ANIMATED DISNEY: BEHIND THE SCENES OF DISNEYTOON STUDIOS; "SHORT FILMS FOR THE Y GENERATION" with Director, Nancy Stein; "THE ROLE OF THE MUSIC SUPERVISOR~ with Hollywood Music Supervisor, Maureen Crowe; "WRITING YOUR VISION," with Producer/Educator, David Coie; "DISCOVERING AMERICA'S SONGBOOK," with former Disney Channel President, Jim Jimirro; and "ITS ALL IN THE COSTUME" with Costume Designer, Maria Schicker SIX SDecial Feature Presentations: SATURDAY NIGHT FEVER and WHOSE LIFE IS IT ANYWA V, with Director John Badham in attendance and holding a Q&A. BLACK CLOUD with Actor/Director Rick Schroder in attendance and holding a Q&A; THE SAGE HUNTER. THE US PREMIERE, with lead actor, director and producer in attendance; THE TREASURE ISLAND KIDS: THE BATTLE OF TREASURE ISLAND with Director Gavin Scott in attendance and holding a Q&A.; WHAT A GIRL WANTS with Director Dennie Gordon in attendance and holding a Q&A 4 ) SPONSORS: MAJOR SPONSORS: City of T emecula · Pechanga Resort and Casino · Paradise Chevrolet - Cadillac Callaway Coastal · Rancon Real Estate · Guidant Corporation · The Outdoor Channel · Magnolia Home Theater · Blockbuster Video. Harold Matzner BLACK nE AWARDS GALA PRESENTING SPONSOR: Pechanga Resort & Casino CO-SPONSOR, BLACK TIE AWARDS GALA: Paradise Chevrolet-Cadillac CONTRIBUTING SPONSORS, BLACK TIE AWARDS GALA: Omni Tech TV Services · Callaway Coastal · Valley Events · AlumaWood,com · Murrieta Sound and Picture CO. MUSICFEST SPONSORS: Blockbuster Video · HeyDay Records · FSM, Flight Safe Music Publishing · Timmy d. Productions OPENING NIGHT SPONSORS: California Pizza Kitchen · PRESTO'S Gourmet. Red Bull Callaway Coastal · The Ballet Studio & Studio D · A Flower Factory CLOSING NIGHT SPONSORS: Scarcella's Italian Grill · EI Polio Loco · Red BtllI Callaway Coastal · Timmy d Productions VENUE SPONSORS: The Garrett Group, LLC. NewMark Merrill, Tower Plaza · Movie Experience, Sanborn Theaters Inc. · Miramonte Winery HOTEL SPONSORS: Pechanga Resort & Casino · Holiday Inn Express · Temecula Creek Inn · Embassy Suites · Hampton Inn & Suites MEDIA SPONSORS: The Press Enterprise · The Californian · Neighbors Newspaper · Valley Business Journal. Entertainment Roundup. KATY 101.3FM .KTMO, 0103.3 · KMYT 94.5 Smooth Jazz .SmoothJazz 1490 .Inland Empire Magazine "Travel Host Magazine. Temecula Lcom" Tour ofTemecula Map Guide CONTRIBUTING SPONSORS: FUJIFILM " IndieFlix · Pacific Trust Bank" Affordable Limousines" Magnolia Home Theater · Flight Safe Music" Timmy d Productions · Valley Events" Power House Graphics" A Grape Escape Balloon Adventure California Dreamin'" CR&R" Carom Visual Comrn "951 Eagle's Mark Awards and Signs. CR&R. Class Act Tuxedo & Rental" Target Foundation PRINT & COPY SPONSORS: Valley Printing" FedExKinko's · Rancon Real Estate · Cregar Printing FILM PRINT AND VIDEO SHIPPING SPONSOR: Federal Express HOSPITALITY SUITE SPONSORS: Rent Time" Country Splendor Flowers & Gifts Starbucks Coffee · Murrieta Oaks Nursery" Red Bull FOOD AND BEVERAGE DONORS: Mount Palomar Winery · Budweiser" Red Robin" Ralph's Supermarket. Carl's Jr. Wal Mart. Pizza Factory. Burger King "Vons. California Bagel Bakery" McDonalds " Stater Bros. " Albertson's" Krispy Creme Doughnuts" Romano's Macaroni Grill Food 4 Less · Pick Up STiX · Marie Callenders " Golden Spoon" Pat & Oscars Anheuser Busch 5 ) ~- TEMECUlA v A "L LEY 2005 TVIFF MEDIA COVERAGE AND IMPRESSIONS REPORT This may sound redundant to 2004's final analysis, but based on the actual content, it's true. The 11th annual T emecula Valley International Film & Music Festival took on an even larger arena of new growth compared to 2004, and 2003 respectively. With last year's 10th anniversary celebration - the opportunities which increased the exposure and media impressions to brand the event, helped this year with 'interest' regarding participation and involvement from mainstream and indie film industry. The new visibility and leverage carried the torch from last year's 'growing pain & gain' phase, showing that the festival "has more bright lights and celebrities strolling , down the red carpet" according to an article by Tim O'Leary of Press-Enterprise, dated Sept.12, 2005. CLEARCHANNEL RADIO 101 KGB SAN DIEGO'S CLASSIC ROCK Morning Show, "Dave, Shelly & Chainsaw" with the Dave and Chainsaw's film, The J-K Conspiracy. Clear Channel did their entire morning show at the Movie Experience. The crew set up from Sept. 15, 12 MN to 4AM and the show went on the air on time at 5AM till10AM the next day, Sept. 16. FILM THREAT.COM & Ultimate Film Festival Survival Guide editor and writer, Chris Gore, with the film, My Big Fat Independent Movie. Chris, as the film's Producer and Writer, gave the festival great coverage, This year for the very first time. EMPIRE RELATIONS 'MARKET WATCH' MEDIA picked up our release and many 'money market watch' sites continued to pick up the festival release, This is growth for the festival in that financial reports are calling attention to the festival growth and development as something to keep eye on for continued spiraling success in terms of sponsorship draw. The continued financial media pick-up is a good leveraging tool for sponsorship for next year. CBS Marketwatch, Opinionetics, Excite Money and Yahoo Finance also continued to pick up our release again, like they did in 2003 and 2004. Other 'continued' noteable media coveralle includes being broadcast AND placed as a mention on the Internet site of MSNBC, and the LOS 6 :. . .< , } newsletternnternet blogs. due to Rick Schroder and .Powerless" filmmaker, Matt Daniels' Mormon faith, like last year, when Sons of Provo gave us this additional link of coverage bonus, Other noteworthv 'firsts' include Wireless Flash news syndicated piece on Rick Schroder and Natasha Henstridge, as well as Mary Steenburgen. KBLM.TV 25 Riverside (who gave us on-site coverage, additional blurbs for 'Best of the Fest" encore screenings and a 'full wrap-up show' broadcast, local public access opportunities for Festival organizers to be on-air, KGB Clearchannel radio's constant promotion and on.site remote broadcast, California Film Industry news, Dally Bulletin, Film Festival Channel (on-site broadcast coverage as well as follow-up wrap-up with encore screening coverage the last day 9/22, News2Air Telemundo TV crew, and brand new media outlets: KZSW.TV and 951 Magazine. Out of the box interest: Cycle Magazine - interest tie-in with the documentary, CHOPPERTOWN and OC Weekly (tie-in interest with Chapman University film showcase and the film, LOOKING FOR SOME POSSE. Several youth internet blog sites primarily generated by the participants of the movie, DESTINATION FAME, which premiered at the festival. IndieFlix's participation in the festival brought in the attendance of New York Times journalist, John Anderson. TVIFF as in prior years, enjoyed consistent, extensive coverage by the Press Enterprise, Californian, North County Times, The Valley News. Valley Living, Entertainment Roundup, Temecula Valley Business Journal, Neighbors, Country Review, KATY Radio, 101.3 FM, Smooth Jazz 1490, Q103.3, 94.5FM, the Inland Empire Magazine, TravelHost Magazine, 951 magazine. TVIFF also had press release pick ups by various film and music industry trade publications, (Hollywood Reporter.com, Billboard.com, Music Connection, Indie Backlot, Backstage West,) as well as special niche media like: US Quad Rugby Association for the documentary, THE GOAL; IndlanFM News Bureau. for the Indian film, DEVAKI and for the Chinese produced and directed film, THE SAGE HUNTER. 7 ADVERTISING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM & MUSIC FESTIVAL This Agreement, made this 25th day of ApriL 2006, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM & MUSIC FESTIVAL, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as ("TVIFMF"). A. TVIFMF will operate the "12th Annual Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival" on September 13 - 17,2006. The Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival is a special event located at the Movie Experience 1O-plex at Tower Plaza in Temecula. The Festival's Awards Gala Night is planned for Pechanga Resort & Casino, The MusicFest component may be held at The Promenade MalL If additional subsequent event venues are held outside the City of Temecula they will be subject to the written approval of the City of Temecula. Attendance at last year's event was approximately 10,000 people. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Major Sponsor" of the 2006 Temecula Valley International Film & Music FestivaL AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. In exchange for the payment of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000.00), the City of Temecula shall be designated as a "Major Sponsor" of the 2006 Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. In exchange for being a Major Sponsor, the City of Temecu1a will receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A. The city sponsorship of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) will not be used to pay for any professional independent contractors hired by the Festival for specific functions required to produce the Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival. The City's sponsorship funds will be designated to the following categories: advertising, theater rental, video equipment projection rental, printing costs, special events catering costs and party equipment rentals. B. Within 90 days after conclusion of the Film & Music Festival, TVIFMF shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Film & Music Festival event, its attendance, media coverage, description of the materials in which the City was listed as a Major Sponsor. In addition, a complete financial statement to include a balance sheet and income statement of the Festival must be included. C. TVIFMF agrees that it will defend, indemnify and hold the City and its elected officials, officer, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by reason of TVIFMF's acts or omissions or those of TVIFMF's employees, officers, agents, or invites in connection with the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival to the maximum extent allowed by law. D. TVIFMF shall file a Temporary Use Permit application with the City of Temecula no later than 60 days preceding the first day of The Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. E. TVIFMF shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City is named insured or is named as an additional insured with TVIFMF and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall; 1. Include the City as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with, the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. 2. Include the City, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. 3. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (A) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage provided on ISO-CGL Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 4. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (A) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (B) Liquor Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. 5. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. 6. Bear an endorsement or shall have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of expiration or proposed cancellation of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by registered mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, not less than thirty (30) days beforehand, 7. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its offi~~rs, officials and employees or TVIFMF shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. F. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused its corporate name and seal to be hereunto subscribed and affixed by Chairperson and attest to by the City Clerk, both thereunto duly authorized, and the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival, has hereunto subscribed this Contract day, month, and year hereinabove written. DATED: TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM & MUSIC FESTIVAL CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Jo Moulton Ronald H. Roberts Founder and Advisory Board Mayor Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival 31468 Corte Montiel Temecula, CA 92592 ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney EXHIBIT A - - - - - - IN rERNA-IIONf\1 I I L 1\1 .\. ,'" U....l '- 11-.... I I \,\ I ~, TEMECULA v ALL E Y CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS . Recognition of the City of Temecula's sponsorship in all festival collateral materials · Recognition of City of Temecula's sponsorship in all applicable broadcast and print media advertising, Festival fliers, brochures and signage. · Acknowledgment of City of Temecula's sponsorship prior to and after every film screening, live music performances, workshops and panel discussions. . Full page, black and white inside Cover Page Advertisement in the Festival Program. · 20 tickets to Opening Night, 20 tickets to the Awards Gala & 20 tickets to MusicFest · 20 Sponsors Passes for access to all screenings, workshops/panels, Hospitality Suite, and all filmmaker/music artists receptions · 50 film screening, MusicFest & workshops/panels tickets for giveaway to City employees, . Access to TVIFF VIP Hospitality Suite . Invitation to TVIFF VIP Pre-Awards Gala Meet and Greet Cocktail Reception. . Hyperlink from the Film Festival website to the City's website. · Prominent City of Temecula logo/name placement in the festival Website and Sponsor Display boards. . Presenting opportunities for City of T emecula officials and staff in various Festival components (from presenters to hosts/hostesses in all prime festival special events). As Host City, the City of Temecula will always be acknowledged as a cooperative entity in the event titling regardiess of who, if any, the eventual Presenting or Title Sponsor will be. The Festival will secure from a good and responsible company or companies, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of the event a policy of comprehensive general liability and liquor liability in which the City of T emecula is named insured or as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with the Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival. Coverage will provide the following minimum limits: . General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. . Liquor Liability - $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. ITEM NO.1 0 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ IJIZ Lf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Anthony Elmo, Director of Building and Safety DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Approve a Third Amendment for Plan Review Services PREPARED BY: Diane Ball, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approves: 1. The Third amendment for Plan Check Services with Esgil Corporation in the amount of $157,000 plus a 10% contingency. BACKGROUND: Plan check activity continues to be heavy. Esgil Corporation provides the City with dedicated, professional and efficient turn around times for our customers. Early plan check activity estimates have been excessive thus requiring this proposed third amendment to our professional services contract with Esgil Corporation. This amendment will bring the total contract amount to $506,130. The City has gone through a user fee study that changed the manner in which user fees for building permits and plan check were calculated. Esgil Corporation continued to charge for plan check services under the old fee calculation methodology. As a result, it has been determined that by Esgil Corporation continuing to calculate fees for their services as previously done but using the City's user fee schedule, compensation for their services was inadequate to support the services they provide the City. Therefore, the fee for services calculation methodology proposed in this amendment has been agreed upon as fair and equitable for the level of service Esgil provides the City. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriation is required as adequate funds are available in Account Number 001-162-999-5248. ATTACHMENTS: Third Amendment to agreement with Exhibit B. EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA Esgil Corporation's plan review fee shall be 75% of the inspection portion of the City's Permit Fee. Plan check fee for repetitive identical buildings shall be 75% of the inspection portion of the City's Permit Fee as noted above for the first, or basic building, and 15% of the inspection portion of the City's Per Fee as noted above for each additional building. The single fee includes all rechecks and there are no additional charges for preliminary plan check conferences at our office, expedited processing, or checking plans that are eventually found to be incomplete. Revisions to previously approved plans will be at Esgil Corporation's published hourly rates. THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ESGIL CORPORATION THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 25, 2006 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation and Esgil Corporation. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On Julv 1. 2004 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City ofTemecula Agreement for Plan Review Services" ("Agreement") in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars $200,000 plus a 10% contingency. B. The contract was amended on June 28, 2005 and added an additional One Hundred Forty Nine Thousand One Hundred Thirty Dollars ($149,130). C. The parties wish to amend the existing agreement by adding one hundred fifty seven thousand ($157,000) plus a 10% contingency. D. The parties also desire to change the terms of payment for services and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment Exhibit B. 2. follows: Section 4a. PAYMENT of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as A. "The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporate herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. This Third Amendment amount shall not exceed one hundred fifty seven thousand ($157,000) for a total contract amount of three hundred seventy two thousand eight hundred ($506.130)." 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Cl WINDOWSIAPSDOCINETTEMP\5416\MSQPDF800019.DOC 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA BY: Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT BY: NAME: Richard Esgate, President Cl WINDOWSIAPSDOCINETTEMP\5416\MSQPDF800019.DOC 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM NO. 11 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APRIL 11,2006 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:28 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Edwards, Roberts, Washington, and Comerchero ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Naggar Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Ballreich. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 12 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the minutes of March 21, 2006; 12.2 Approve the minutes of March 28, 2006. 13 Completion and Acceptance for the Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Complex Svnthetic Turf - Proiect No. PlN01-17CSD RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Accept the project, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Complex Synthetic Turf - Project No. PW01-17CSD - Turf as complete; 13.2 File the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one- year Maintenance Bond; 13.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. (Pulled off calendar.) R:\Minutes\041106 14 Acceptance of a Storm Drain Construction and Maintenance Easement Deed alonq Marqarita Road within the Harveston Development RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Accept the Storm Drain Construction and Maintenance Easement Deed and the Parkland/Landscape Faithful Performance Bond and authorize the City Clerk to record the easement document. MOTION: Director Washington moved to approve the Consent Calendar Item Nos. 12 and 14 (Item No. 13 was pulled off calendar). Director Edwards seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Naggar who was absent. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No additional comment. CSD GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT No additional comment. CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No additional comment. CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 25, 2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL R:\Minutes\041106 2 ITEM NO. 12 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /J1l ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Community Dog Park RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1) Approve the development of a Community Dog Park on three-quarters of an acre of unused parkland on the southwest corner of Margarita Community Park. 2) Authorize staff to begin the installation of improvements to the proposed dog park site. BACKGROUND: During the past three (3) years the number of calls from the general public requesting a community dog park has continued to increase as residents move to Temecula from San Diego and Orange County communities where dog parks are available for their use. At the last Capital I mprovement Program (CIP) workshop, the City Council directed staff to work with the Community Services Commission to identify potential locations for the development of a community dog park. As a result, the Community Services Commission selected a sub-committee of the Commission which consisted of Chairman Tom Edwards and Commissioner Felicia Hogan, to serve as a task force working with staff to identify potential dog park locations within the City. Over the past several months the Commission representatives and staff have toured other dog parks in communities such as Poway, Rancho Bernardo, Escondido and others. Staff and the sub- committee then visited several of the existing park sites within the community to identify potential locations for a dog park. In addition, members of staff and members of the Commission attended a special seminar on dog parks at the recent California Parks and Recreation Society Annual Conference. After an extensive review of our existing park sites, and the improvements needed to successfully construct a dog park, staff brought forward an item to the Community Services Commission and the Commission unanimously recommended that the City's first dog park be constructed on an unused portion of park land located at Margarita Community Park. The proposed dog park location is a approximately one acre in size and would be located directly behind where the proposed YMCA facilitywill be constructed at Margarita Community Park. The site already has a concrete walkway leading to the proposed dog park area, security lighting and some fencing is already in place. The construction of a dog park would simply be park improvements to an unused portion of the park site. Improvements would include additional chain link fencing, two chain link double gates with a concrete base, chain link fencing to create a separation of the site for a large dog area and a small dog area, turf and irrigation, water fountains for both human and canines, picnic tables, park signage and lighting retrofits. Ample parking currently exits at Margarita Community Park for easy access to this area. Staff would also insure that appropriate trash cans are available and also appropriate apparatus for the ease removal of animal waste by pet owners. The Community Services Commission has reviewed the site which is currently an unused portion of the park. Constructing a dog park in this area has no conflict with existing uses or public uses of this area. The Community Services Commission feels thatthis would be an ideal location for a dog park. FISCAL IMPACT: Currently the CIP provides $150,000 towards the design and construction of a dog park. The design costs are currently estimated at $8,500. Construction costs are currently estimated at $98,000. ATTACHMENTS: Photograph of proposed dog park site. ~'"'~ Margarita Community Park Dog Park TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 13 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /JJ2 ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report PREPARED BY: Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Assistant Construction of the Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park (Wolf Creek Sports Complex) continues. Installation of the field lighting, installation of artificial turf fields and parking lot are complete. Construction of the buildings and irrigation systems continue. Construction of the Temecula Public Library project is currently underway. Construction of the retainer walls is complete and the structural steel is nearing completion. Staff continues to meet regularly to discuss furniture selections, information systems needs, etc. Construction of the Boys and Girls Club project at Kent Hintergardt Park is currently underway. Standard Pacific has started construction of the parking lot improvements. The Community Services Department releases an RFQ to landscape architect firms for Redhawk Park Improvements forthe four Redhawk park sites acquired on June 30, 2005 with the annexation of Redhawk into the City of Temecula. The City Council approved a contract with RJM Design to begin designing the improvements to the park sites. These improvements include picnic tables, picnic shelters, park benches, sidewalks, tot lots, etc. The Cultural Arts Division is busy conducting spring classes and activities as outlined in the Guide to Leisure Activities. In addition, the Cultural Arts Division is responsible forthe day-to-dayoperations at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, the History Museum and the Imagination Workshop, Temecula Children's Museum. The Development Services Division continue to participate in the development review for projects within the City including Wolf Creek, Roripaugh and Harveston, as well as overseeing the development of parks and recreation facilities, and the contract for refuse and recycling, cable television services and assessment administration. The TCSD Maintenance Division continues to oversee the maintenance of all City parks and facilities, and assist in all aspects of Citywide special events. The Recreation Division staff is currently conducting spring classes, activities and special events as outlined in the Guide to Leisure Activities. The annual Spring Egg Hunt was held on Saturday, April 22, 2006 at four parks sites in the community. Approximately 500 children participated in egg hunts at each park site for a total of approximately 2000 participants. In addition, the Recreation Division is preparing the Summer/Fall edition of the Guide to Leisure Activities. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM NO. 14 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 28, 2006 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:26 PM., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, and Naggar ABSENT: o AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 11 Status Update on the Temecula Education Center RECOMMENDATION 11.1 Receive and file. MOTION: Agency Member Washington moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Agency Member Comerchero seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING 12 Owner Participation Aqreement for Dalton III Mixed Use Affordable Housinq Proiect RECOMMENDATION 12.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BElWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND PALOMAR HERITAGE BUILDING, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY R:\Minutes\032806 12.2 That the Temecula Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 06-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BElWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND PALOMAR HERITAGE BUILDING, LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED COMPANY Council Member Edwards advised that her employer may be providing financing for this project and, therefore, noted that she would be abstaining with regard to this matter. Director of Housing and Redevelopment Director of Housing Meyer presented the staff report (as per agenda material). At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Neil Cleveland, Temecula, expressed his opposition to the proposed project, expressing concern with parking with particular emphasis on on-site parking spaces, balance of parking provided by way of streets, public parking facilities, private properties, and the potential burden to on-street parking and existing public parking facilities. Mr. Cleveland suggested that possibly the formation of an Assessment District should be required for the construction of public parking facilities; questioned whether studies have been conducted to address this matter; and requested a continuance until a comprehensive plan could be completed to ensure public parking will be adequately provided for this project, existing projects, and future projects. Addressing the previously mentioned parking concern, Mr. Bill Dalton, applicant, advised that 25 residential parking spaces will be provided in Dalton II and that in Dalton III, 16 parking spaces will be provided for the majority of the tenants. Mr. Dalton relayed his goal with the proposed project to tie Front Street to Mercedes Street. In response to the Agency Members, Director of Housing and Redevelopment Meyer noted the following: D that parking studies have been undertaken in Old Town o that there are approximately 1,300 parking spaces in Old Town - on-street public parking, off-street public parking, and off-street private parking o that parking studies indicated that even on weekends during special events, parking has never exceeded the 50% mark; that there is currently an adequate parking supply in Old Town D that since the Specific Plan was adopted in 1994, approximately 400 off-street public parking spaces have been created D that as part of the Civic Center Master Plan, a 350 - 400 parking space structure will be included D that there will be sufficient parking in Old Town to accommodate Dalton II and III. City Attorney Thorson noted that under the City's current Zoning Ordinance, no on-site parking is required for the proposed project and that the project will actually be over parked by 13 spaces. R:\Minutes\032806 2 Viewing the Dalton projects as a catalyst to achieving the future vision of Old Town, Council Member/Agency Member Comerchero commended Mr. Dalton and his family; expressed his support of the proposed project; and relayed his opinion that parking will not be a concern. In an effort to create a more pedestrian-oriented Old Town, Council Member Washington viewed the proposed project as visionary and as well noted that he would be of the opinion that there will be sufficient parking in Old Town. In light of the existing available parking spaces and the future parking structure that will be constructed, Chair Person Naggar relayed his support of the proposed project; briefly commented on the function of a Redevelopment Agency; and requested that the press publish an article on the City's Redevelopment Agency and its activities and its accomplishments. MOTION: Council Member/Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mayor/Agency Member Roberts and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Council Member/Agency Member Edwards who abstained. Recessed City Council Meeting DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional comment. RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Nelson commented on the vision that has been developed for Old Town and further commented on efforts that will be undertaken to ensure parking needs will be properly addressed. RDA AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No additional reports. R:\Minutes\032806 3 RDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:55 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 11 ,2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\032806 4 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APRIL 11,2006 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:30 PM., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Roberts, Washington, and Edwards ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and Deputy City Clerk Ballreich. In Chair Person Naggar's absence, Vice Chair Person Edwards presided over the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 15 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the minutes of March 21, 2006. 16 Award the Construction Contract and Approval of a Soil Excavation and Temporarv Entrv Aqreement with the Rancho California Water District for the Temecula Education Center Rouqh Gradinq - Proiect No. PW06-03 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Award a construction contract for the Temecula Education Center Rough Grading - Project No. PW06-03, - to Yeager Skanska, Inc. in the amount of $3,155,810 and authorize the Agency Chairperson to execute the contract; 16.2 Authorize the Executive Director to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $315,581, which is equal to 10% of the contract amount; 16.3 Approve an appropriation of $730,000 and $270,000 ($1,000,000 total) for the Temecula Education Center Rough Grading Project No. PW 06-03 from Developer Reimbursables and Reimbursement from the Rancho California Water District (RCWD), respectively; R:\Minutes\041106 16.4 Establish estimated revenues for the Temecula Rough Grading Project No. PW 06- 03 in the amount of $730,000 and $270,000 ($1,000,000 total) for Developer Reimbursables and for Reimbursement from RCWD, respectively; 16.5 Approve an advance of $1 ,000,000 from Redevelopment Agency Affordable Housing Funds to the Temecula Education Center Rough Grading Project No. PW 06-03; 16.6 Approve a Soil Excavation and Temporary Entry Agreement with the Rancho California Water District, and authorize the Executive Director to execute the Agreement. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Agency Member Washington seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Chair Person Naggar who was absent. RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Nelson commended the Public Works Department for its efforts with moving the Education Center Rough Grading project forward. RDA AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No additional reports. RDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:31 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 25, 2006, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\041106 2 ITEM NO. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /JIL ~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: John Meyer, Redevelopment Director DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Emergency and Large Vehicle Access Easement Deed RECOMMENDATION: Thatthe Agency Members approve the Grant of EmergencyVehicle Access Easement Deed for the Habitat for Humanity property located at 28731 Pujol Street (APN 922-062-016). BACKGROUND: The City Council and Agency Board entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Inc. (Habitat). The project is for the development of up to five single-family homes located at the northwest corner of Pujol and First Street in the Pujol Neighborhood. In January of 2004, the Agency acquired the property adjacent to the north side of the Habitat project. The Habitat project has been designed to expand onto this property. The purpose of the easement is to allow emergency and large vehicle turn around access. When the northerly parcel develops, this easement will become part of Habitat Way. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no Fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: Grant of Emergency Vehicle Access Easement Deed Recording requested by and when recorded mail to: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589 Attn: City Clerk FREE RECORDING REQUESTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE ~~ 6103 and 27383 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE No Documentary Transfer Taxes Due: See Revenue & Taxation Code S 11922 and Government Code S 6103 APN: 922-062-016 []ALL [x] PORTION GRANT OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT DEED THIS EASEMENT DEED (this "Easement Deed") is made as of this 25th day of April, 2006, by the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ("Grantor"), to and for the benefit of the HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INLAND V ALLEY, INC., a California non-profit corporation ("Grantee"). 1. Grant of Easements. For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, and to its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive, appurtenant easement and right over, under and across a portion of that certain real property owned by Grantor located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California (the "Easement Area"), for purposes of emergency and large vehicle access over, under and across a portion of that certain real property owned by Grantor located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California (the "Easement Area"). The Easement Area is legally described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" and, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. Benefit of Easements. The Easements granted hereby are for the benefit of Grantee and its successors and assigns. 3. Grantee Responsible for Costs of Easements. Grantee shall be solely responsible for all costs related to the construction, repair and maintenance of the Easement Area, and any other professional fees associated with the work and all other obligations of Grantee contemplated by this Easement Deed. C\WINDOWS\apsdoc\nettemp\3172\$ASQpdf799909.DOCl1087\OOOI \883317-1 4. Duration of Easements. The Easements shall continue for so long as Grantee shall use the Easement Area for the above-stated purpose. 5. Indemnification bv Grantee. Grantee covenants and agrees that it shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless the Grantor, its officers, directors, members, agents and/or employees from and against any and all liability, loss or damage to which the Grantor, its officers, directors, members, agents and/or employees may be subjected to as the result of the rights granted herein or the existence or presence of the structures and improvements covered and/or contemplated by this Easement Deed or any act or omission by Grantee, its officers, members, agents or employees arising out of the exercise by Grantee, its officer, members, agents or employees of any of the rights granted to Grantee by this Easement Deed. 6. Compliance with Laws. Grantee covenants and agrees that it shall at all times construct, maintain, use, repair and operate the Easement Area in compliance with any and all applicable federal, state or local laws, regulations, codes, ordinances, standards, decisions of the courts, permits or permit conditions. 7. Permitted Use. Grantee shall use the Easement Area solely for the above-stated purposes and for no other use, purpose or purposes whatsoever. 8. Reservation bv Grantor. SPECIFICALLY EXCEPTING AND RESERVING THE RIGHT, to be exercised by the Grantor and its successors and assigns, and by any other party who has obtained, or may obtain, permission or authority from Grantor or its successors and assigns to do so: (a) to operate, maintain, repair, renew and/or relocate any all existing wires, fiber optic cables, piped, and other facilities of like character, over or under the surface of the Easement Area; and (b) from time to time to construct, operate, maintain, repair, renew and/or relocate upon the Easement Area additional facilities of the character described in clause (a) of this paragraph, consistent with the right granted herein, without in any instance being required to obtain the consent of Grantee the same as if this Easement Deed had not been executed; provided, however, that in the exercise of such rights, Grantor shall use reasonable care not to materially interfere with or block the use of the Easement Area or to damage any fencing or other improvements located thereon. 9. Nondiscrimination Clause. BY ACCEPTANCE HEREOF, Grantee covenants, for itself and its successors and assigns, to refrain from restricting the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, sex, marital status, national origin or age of any person, nor shall Grantee establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees, or vendees in the Property. All deeds, leases or contracts entered into with respect to the Property shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscriminationlnonsegregation clauses: IN DEEDS: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation 11087\0001\883317-1 -2- of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or herself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub lessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." IN LEASES: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himself or herself, his or her heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him or her, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of age, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use or occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein leased nor shall the lessee himself or herself, or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants or vendees in the land herein leased." IN CONTRACTS: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person, or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, age, national origin, sex, marital status or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transferee himself or herself or any person claiming under or through him or her, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub lessees or vendees ofthe land." I O. Miscellaneous. a. Waiver. If Grantor or Grantee fails to insist on the strict observance by the other party of any of the provisions of this Easement Deed, neither party shall be precluded from subsequently enforcing this Easement Deed or be held to have waived any such provision. b. Relationship of the Parties. Nothing in this Easement Deed shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto or by any third person to create the relationship of principal and agent, partnership, joint venture, landlord and tenant or any other association between Grantor and Grantee other than the relationship described herein. c. Entire Agreement. This Easement Deed, including all exhibits hereto (which are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes), contain the full and final agreement of every kind and nature whatsoever between the parties hereto concerning the subject matter set forth herein and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of any kind are merged herein. This Easement Deed may not be changed, amended or modified in any manner other 11087\0001\883317-1 -3- than by a written amendment or modification executed by and between Grantor and Grantee or their respective successors and/or assigns. d. Captions. The captions used in this Easement Deed are for convenience only and therefore do not constitute a part of this Easement Deed and do not amplify or limit the meaning ofthe provisions of this Easement Deed. e. Partial Invaliditv. If any provIsion of this Easement Deed or the application thereof shall be held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Easement Deed in its application shall not be affected by such partial invalidity but shall be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law as if such invalid or unenforceable provision was never a part hereof. f. Applicable Law. This Easement Deed shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California and the parties agree that jurisdiction for all actions hereunder shall lie in the State of California. g. Costs of Enforcement. If any legal or equitable action or proceeding is instituted by one party against the other to enforce or interpret any provision of this Easement Deed, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover from the losing party all of the prevailing party's costs of suit, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees awarded by the court. h. Successors and Assigns. All rights, obligations and liabilities herein given to or imposed upon any party hereto shall extend to the permitted successors and assigns of any such party. i. Time of Essence. Time IS of the essence of each prOVlSlon of this Easement Deed in which time is an element. j. Countemarts. This Easement Deed may be executed in one or more identical counterparts and all such counterparts together shall constitute a single instrument for the purpose of the effectiveness ofthis Easement Deed. 11087\0001\883317-1 -4- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Easement Deed to be executed as of the day and year first above written. "GRANTOR" REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA John Meyer Director Attest: Susan Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 11087\0001\883317-1 -5- CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE GRANT OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT DEED The undersigned, being the duly appointed agent of HABIT AT FOR HUMANITY INLAND V ALLEY, INC., a California non-profit corporation, does hereby accept on behalf of HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INLAND V ALLEY, INC., the Grant of Emergency Vehicle Access Easement dated April 25, 2006 by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, and HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INLAND V ALLEY, INC., and the undersigned does hereby certify that the Grantee consents to the recordation of said Grant of Emergency Vehicle Access Easement. HABIT AT FOR HUMANITY INLAND V ALLEY, INC., a California non-profit corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: Date: 11087\0001\883317-1 -6- State of California } } ss. County of Riverside } On ,2006, before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (seal) 11087\0001\883317-1 -7- State of California } } ss. County of Riverside } On , 2006, before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (seal) 11087\0001\883317-1 -8- EXHIBITS A AND B LEGAL DESCRIPTION - EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT LOT 5 IN BLOCK 34 OF THE TOWNSITE OF TEMECULA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 15 PAGE 726 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF AN ANNEXED STREET OF ADJACENT AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SAID LOT AS VACATED BY RESOLUTION FILED DECEMBER 8,1936, IN BOOK 304, PAGE 356 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 11087\0001\883317-1 EXHIBIT B EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS EASEMENT ~ ~ SITE VICINITY NAP No r.s. LEGEND /Wi ". ~ DIETirlOtCY ~ AGtm' iNti l!itlCK JI itA 15f/726 8AfI_t:IlU1I11' I 1P/fJ&J@@/l, ~@ /A1iJfl,1iJ" f/f/@/@@aff'fj) PREPARED BY.- ~ ". 8IIO()I(S ctJNSU.TNG EMJINEEHS l5JO ctJN5UJIER CIW:lE tNT 8 ~tx!l2lJlJ() PH. (951) J72-IHfJ(J FAK (951) J72-8IJ(J BASIS OF BEARING I1FMI1tf'JS ME /MStl) ON TIE CEN1ERUE (JF" FNST S1TiEET /JEHJ NH"2!I:vt" AS SNOIIN If 8fK1II( " (JF" HEtYJIiI) (JF" ~ 1WiES H-I5, ~ (JF" RMHSIJC C()UI(TY. LINE 0A7:4 1UIllER lDQ1( /1FM1NG 11 222.1J 1N5".xJ'51 " l2 tiN NH"2!I'(Jg~ LJ .I2,1J(J NH"2!I'(Jg~ U ,J(J.1J(J 1N5".xJ'51 " i5 .I2,1J(J NH"2!I'(Jg~ L6 ,J(J.1J(J 1N5".xJ'51 " LOT6 IILtlCK 31 1If..e. 1!fI72W 8AfI1JIBI(J ctJ!IIITY I !~ I : I~ I .P. .8. l4H. "1 /f'J~1I 1/f'J~/JItiJ/f'J_ I /f'J.Ii'lkflJ. 31:!1/1IiJJ.1I&1 t;)1 I~ i I ~_ PM. " . iVi'-1 c< -""";p" .i&H~' (WS6 (U)/I//Itr;Sl FO. ,. LP. lAG ILLEGIBLf (ReE 2LJI) ACCEPTED AS BEING IN POSIT/ON OF MOST WESTERLY PROPERTY CORNER SET PER RS 64/44-45 AND REfERENCED ON PMB 116/69-78. ~ I ~ SCALE 1 II = 100' FD. I' LP. NO lAG FOUND. ACCEPTED AS BEING IN POSIT/ON OF MONUMENT FOR C/L fiRST STREET AND WESTERLY R/W LINE OF PUJOL STREET. SET PER RS 64/44-45 AND REfERENCED ON. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /JJ2 ~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: John Meyer, Redevelopment Director DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Redevelopment Departmental Monthly Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of April 25, 2006 for the Redevelopment Department. First Time Homebuvers Proqram Funding in the amount of $100,000 is available for FY 05 -06. Residential Improvement Proqrams The program budget for FY 05-06 is $250,000, with $260,000 funded on 45 units. The amount available to each participant increased from $5,000 to $7500. Habitat for Humanitv Council entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Habitat for Humanity to develop a home-ownership project within the Pujol Neighborhood. The project located on the northwest corner of Pujol and First Streets, will consist of 5 new single-family detached homes. The houses are arranged along Pujol Street and a private lane. Habitat has resubmitted final grading plans, street improvements and final map to Public Works for review. Dalton Mixed-Use II On May 28, 2005, the Council approved an Owner Participation Agreement with D'Alto Partners to build a mixed-use affordable housing project. The project will consist of 24 units over 5,000 sq. ft. of retail/commercial. The project is located on the north side of Fifth Street, west of Mercedes. Vertical construction has begun with the installation of vertical steel. Dalton Mixed-Use III On March 28, 2006, the Council approved an Owner Participation Agreement with D'Alto Partners to build a mixed-use affordable housing project. The project will consist of 22 units over 4,700 sq. ft. of retail/commercial. The project is located on the north side of Fifth Street, west of Mercedes. Temecula Education Center The City Council awarded the construction contract and approval of a soil excavation and temporary entry agreement with the Rancho California Water District for the Temecula Education Center Rough Grading on April 11 ,2006. The grading process will begin May 1,2006 and construction in October 2006. Facade Improvement/Non-Conforminq Siqn Proqram The following facade improvement/sign projects are in process or have recently been completed: . The Farmers Wife Design and install three wood signs Din-Skin Design and Install 3 wood sandblasted signs, D European Cafe Design and Install Five Wood Sandblasted Signs D State Farm Insurance - Design and Install Three Wood Signs. Old Town Promotions/Marketinq Painted Parasol Festival The Painted Parasol was held in Old Town Temecula on April 22, 2006. The Festival enabled children and adults the opportunity to paint their own parasols, then parade them around Old Town Temecula as they listened to both Jazz and Blues bands playing throughout the day. The Children's Imagination Workshop sponsored the activity from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. while supplies lasted. The cost was $4 and included the parasol and paints. The Festival included the electrifying performance of Teresa Russell and the Cocabillis, Cajun Blues from the Bayou Brothers and the award-winning rockin' blues of Aunt Kizzy'z Boyz on the blues stage. The Jazz Stage included Temecula Valley High School Jazz Ensemble, Valley Winds, Vail Ranch Middle School and the Mt. San Jacinto Menifee Campus Jazz Ensemble. The event also included food and craft vendors. Other upcoming events will include Western Days, May 20 & 22 the Street Painting Festival, June 24 & 25 and Hot Summer Nights beginning July 7 through August 12, 2006. ITEM NO. 17 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ /J1l ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all Zoning Districts within the City of Temecula PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030, 17.08.030 AND 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY BACKGROUND: In 1996 the California Voters adopted Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act ("Prop 215"), which allowed the use of marijuana for medical purposes under certain circumstances. Later, the Legislature enacted statues implementing Prop 215. Since that time, advocates of medical marijuana have established medical marijuana dispensaries in cities in California, and the California Supreme Court has stated that Prop 215 makes the possession of marijuana for medical purposes legal. However, complicating this issue is the relationship between Federal and State law regarding medical marijuana. In June 2006, the United States Supreme Court held thatthe Federal Controlled Substances Act authorizes Federal authorities to prosecute persons who cultivate, possess or distribute marijuana within the State of California, even if for medical purposes allowed under Prop 215. The United States Supreme Court also held that Congress, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Consultation, has the authority to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even though such use and cultivation would be in compliance with California law. The Supreme Court's decision did not invalidate Prop 215 or the related implementing statues. Thus, while medical marijuana use appears to be legal under California law, it is clearly illegal under Federal law and nothing under Prop 215 requires a city to allow medical marijuana dispensaries within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. Prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Temecula is a land use decision that does not affect an individual's right to cultivate and possess marijuana for his or her own medical purposes under Prop 215 and State law. The Planning Commission heard this issue at the April 5, 2006 public hearing and took testimony from five individuals in favor of allowing these uses within the City of Temecula. The Planning Commission discussed the conflicting issues between State and Federal law and the City Attorney emphasized that the proposed zoning ordinance is a land use decision of the City and that their role was to make a recommendation on this land use issue to the City Council. The Planning Commission voted 4:0 to forward staff's recommendation to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries within City of Temecula. Environmental Determination: Staff prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Negative Declaration analyzed the potential environmental impacts of this ordinance and determined that there are no adverse environmental impacts. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed City Council Ordinance No. 06- _ Planning Commission Staff Report Dated April 5, 2006 City of Concord Litigation Materials ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030, 17.08.030 AND 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance and the Negative Declaration on April 5, 2006, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. B. At the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-28 recommending approval of the Ordinance by the City Council. C. The City Council considered the Ordinance and Negative Declaration on April 25, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. D. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan and each element thereof. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines and declares that: A. The voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. and entitled The Compassionate Use Act of 1996). B. The State enacted SB-420 in 2003 (Health & Safety Code Sections 11362.7 to 11362.83) to clarify the scope of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and to allow cities and other governing bodies to adopt and forge rules and regulations consistent with SB-420. C. In May 2001 , the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Oakland Buyers' Cooperative and Jeffrey Jones holding that distribution of medical marijuana is illegal under the CSA and there is no medical necessity defense allowed under federal law. D. On June 6, 2005, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Gonzales v. Raich which held that Congress, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, has the authority and, under the Federal Controlled Substances Act 21 USC Section 841 (CSA), power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even though it would be in compliance with California law. E. In light of these decisions, the City Council finds that it would be inconsistent and contrary to the public health, safety, and general welfare to permit the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries, as defined herein, within the City insofar as to permit such activities may subject the City and/or its officials and employees to prosecution under federal law and would otherwise constitute illegal activity under federal law. F. Until such inconsistency is resolved between the federal and state laws with respect to medical marijuana, it is the intent of the Council to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Temecula. G. Anecdotal evidence indicates that medical marijuana dispensaries are subject to a significantly higher incidences of burglaries and robberies at the site than other businesses, robberies of patrons leaving the dispensaries, loitering and nuisance activities in and around the sites, and persons without medical need attempting to purchase marijuana at the sites. H. Neither the Compassionate Use Act nor its implementing legislation authorizes medical marijuana dispensaries nor requires the City to provide for medical marijuana dispensaries. I. This Ordinance is necessary to preserve the public health, safety and general welfare of the City of Temecula and is not in conflict with the general laws. J. This Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan and each element thereof. Section 3. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of this Ordinance amending the City's Development Code to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (the "Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City Staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 4, 2006 and expired on April 3, 2006. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the April 25, 2006 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it, finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on the findings set forth in this Section, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. Section 4. Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the definition of "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" to Section 17.34.010 to read as follows: "Medical Marijuana Dispensary. A facility or location, whether fixed or mobile, which provides, makes available or distributes marijuana to a primary caregiver, a qualified patient or a person with an identification card issued in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.5 et seq." Section 5. The use matrices of Sections 17.06.030 and 17.08.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to establish a Medical Marijuana Dispensary, as defined in Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code, as a prohibited use in all zones of the City. Section 6. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 7. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of April , 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 25th day of April 2006, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk STAFF REPO.RT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dale.West, Associate Planner DATE: April 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries BACKGROUND ihe proposed ordinance defines "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" and prohibits such uses in all zones of the City of Temecula. In 1996, the California voters adopted Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act ("Prop 215"), allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes under certain circumstances. Later, the Legislature enacted statutes implementing Prop 215. Since that time, advocates of medical marijuana have established medical marijuana dispensaries in retail stores in cities in California in reliance on Prop 215.The California Supreme Court has stated unequivocally that Prop 215 makes the possession of marijuana for medical purposes legal. People v. Mower, 28 Cal. 4th 457 (2002). Nothing in Prop 215, however, requires cities to allow medical marijuana dispensaries. Further complicating this issue is the relationship between federal and state law regarding medical marijuana. On June 6, 2005, the United States Supreme Court held in the case of Gonzalez v. Raich that the Federal Controlled Substances Act authorizes federal authorities to prosecute persons who cultivate, possess or distribute marijuana solely within the State of California, even if for medical purposes allowed under Prop 215. The United States Supreme Court also held that Congress, under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, has the authority to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even though such cultivation and use would be in compliance with California law. The Supreme Court's decision, however, did not invalidate Prop 215 or the California statutes implementing it. Thus, while medical marijuana use appears legal under California law, it is clearly illegal under Federal law. Many cities worry that by allowing medical marijuana dispensaries they may be aiding and abetting a violation of federal law. Agents of the Federal Drug Enforcement Agency carried out a raid on December 20,2005 at the Hopenet medical marijuana dispensary in San Francisco. DEA Agents have conducted other raids on medical marijuana dispensaries in Northern California since the U. S. Supreme Court decision in Gonza/es v. Raich. The City Attorneys Department of the League of California Cities conducted an informal survey in January 2006 of how cities are dealing with this issue. The Cities of Rocklin, Lincola, Concord, .Susanville, Pasadena and Fresno have each adopted ordinances prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries from operating in their cities. The Concord ordinance only allows a medical marijuana dispensary in a licensed hospital. All have been sued to invalidate the prohibition on medical marijuana dispensaries by the Americans for Safe Access, an active group advocating changes in the laws concerning medical marijuana use. The City of Concord filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on a number of legal grounds, including the fact that Federal law invalidates the State law. Following this motion, the Plaintiff's dismissed the lawsuit against the City of Concord. The cities of Dixon, Elk Grove, Fairfax, Santa Cruz, West Hollywood, Berkeley, Oakland, Martinez, Plymouth and Santa Rosa have each adopted ordinances permitting medical marijuana dispensaries, but regulate the number of dispensaries and the manner in which they operate. The majority of the cities participating in the survey have adopted a zoning moratorium on medical marijuana dispensaries and are waiting for the legal issues to be resolved. Staff recommends that medical marijuana dispensaries be prohibited in the City of Temecula. At this time, medical marijuana dispensaries are illegal under Federal law and the persons who operate them are subject to Federal prosecutions. Efforts are underway by medical marijuana advocates to change Federal law and regulation. The City's Development Code does not permit other uses which violate Federal law. If Federal law and regulations change, the City can reexamine the prohibitions o~ medical marijuana dispensaries. It is important to note that any City land use decision banning medical marijuana dispensaries within the City does not affect an individual's right to cultivate and possess marijuana for his or her own medical purposes under Proposition 215 and state law. The proposed ordinance prohibits only marijuana dispensaries that provide, make available or distribute medical marijuana to others. An ordinance prohibiting marijuana dispensaries cannot change the rights granted to patients under Prop 215 because Prop 215 and the implementing legislation are state statues adopted by initiative. Persons interested in using marijuana for medical purposes must review Prop 215 to determine the applicable law and should consult with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has prepared and circulated a Negative Declaration in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Negative Declaration analyzed the potential environmental impacts of this ordinance and determined that there are no adverse environmental impacts. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve an Amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code. ATIACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution No. 06-_ - Blue Page 3 Exhibit A - Proposed CC Ordinance No. 06- 2. 'nitial Study and Negative Declaration - Blue Page 4 ATTACHMENT NO.1 PC J;lESOLUTION NO. 06-_ , .I PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030, 17.08.030 AND 17.34.010 OF" THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY (PLANNING APPLICATION PA06-0052)" Section 1. On April 12, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted a comprehensive update to the City General Plan and Certified the Final Environmental Impact Report. Section 2. On January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's Development Code. Section 3. The City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code. Section 4. The Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on April 5, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this \ matter. } Section 5. Recommendation of Approval. That the City of T emecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending portions of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 6. Environmental Compliance. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission recommends that t.he City Council finds that City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of this Ordinance amending the City's Development Code to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (the "Projecf'). Based upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City Staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 4, 2006 and expired on April 3, 2006. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589. The City Council review the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the _, 2006 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it, finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalPC\2PC RESOLUTION Attachment 1.doc1 Section 7. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Tehlecula Planning Commission this 5th day of April 2006. ) Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th qay of April, 2006, by the following vote of the Commission: ( AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalPC\2PC RESOLUTION Attachment 1.doc2 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED CC ORDINANCE 06-_ R:IOrdinances\Medical MarijuanalPC\2PC RESOLUTION Attachment 1.doc3 ORDINANCE NO. 06-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030, 17.08.030 AND 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance and the Negative Declaration on April 5, 2006, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; B. At the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 06- recommending approval of the Ordinance by the City Council; C. The City Council considered the Ordinance and Negative Declaration on , 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; D. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan and each element thereof. Section 2. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of this Ordinance amending the City's . Development Code to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (the "Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City Staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 4, 2006 and expired on April 3, 2006. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative Declaration prior to and at the , 2006 public hearing, and based on R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\P03Tem Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordiance.DOC I the whole record before it, finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on the findings set forth in this Section, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. Section 3. Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby amended to add the definition of "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" to Section 17.34.010 to read as follows: "Medical Marijuana Dispensary. A facility or location, whether fixed or mobile, which provides, makes available or distributes marijuana to a primary caregiver, a qualified patient or a person with an identification card issued in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.5 et seq." Section 4. The use matrices of Sections 17.06.030 and 17.08.030 of the . Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to establish a Medical Marijuana Dispensary, as defined in Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code, as a prohibited use in all zones of the City. Section 5. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase. thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2006. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan Jones, MMC City Clerk R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\PC\3Tem Medical Marijuana Dispensary Orruance.DOC 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 06-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2006, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 2006 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC ) City Clerk R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\P03Tem Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordiance.DOC 3 ATfACHMENT NO.2 INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION i, City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 - ) Environmental Checklist Proiect Title Medical Marijuana Ordinance Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Dale West, Associate Planner (951) 694-6400 Proiect Location Citywide Proiect Soonsor's Name and Address Citv of Temecula General Plan Desicnation Citvwide Zonina Citywide Description of Project An ordinance amending the City's Municipal Code defining "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" and prohibiting such use in all zones of the Citv of Temecula. Surroundina Land Uses and Settinq Citywide Other public agencies whose approval None . is reauired .,~) R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc i. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected !J The environmental factors checked b.elow would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Aariculture Resources Noise Air Qualitv Population and HousinQ . Bioloaical Resources Public Services Cultural Resources . Recreation GeoloQY and Soils T ransportation/T raffic Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Hvdroloay and Water Qualitv Mandatorv Findinos of Sionificance Land Use and PlanninQ ./ None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) . On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find thatthe proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a ./ NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I firid that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to'by the proiect proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is reauired. I find thatthe proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on. the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVI RONMENT AL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analvze on Iv the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequat~ly in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed proiect, nothino further is required. , ) ) ~AJJ:A . Sig ature ~ -d--f --0 &, Date . DaleWest. Associate Planner Printed name For City of Temecula R:\Ordinances\Medlcal Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUPY.doc 2 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a. b: 1S:&_~$._a:tt isY :ortr;-:;!/fuwr."aliQi;l~SbM.t,c:e.S: Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic hi hwa ? Substantially degrade the existing visual character or uali of the site and its surroundin s? Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ~~Jj)~~IIY Siijill!W~ri' lfu~~~t \,.~.T!lan :$llil!. ~liC.'1\\ JIilLaOt Ni;l Jw.aCl .( .( t c. .( d. .( Comments: 1.a-d. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not noticeably affect current views or vistas in this area. No changes or alterations to scenic vistas, highways or substantial visual areas will occur as a result of this project. R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarljuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 3 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural LanP'-' Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation ~ an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: 'Ffd~littIIY'" ~.ele,..I(~ljy .$J~"IJjQ".~j</.le~S 1;\>$.S,-1"O. $Jiillifl~a.1 M,!ii.!~tlQh sti1JaifJ:caot No IssueS.and:SJ.jl:l[}!:lf:linolhform.aUon:S-Q,ur:ce,S rm;;act. Inco orated Imn.act Impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland -/ . of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-aaricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a -/ Williamson Act contract? c. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, -/ due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: 2.a-c. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not result in the conversion of any farmland, conflict with existing zoning for agriculture use or Williamson Act contract, or involve other changes in the existing environment which would result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses, as a result no impacts to agricultural resources are expected to occur. R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.dec 4 ~ \ 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality -') management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: F>hliiiillolly Potentially Signlficaht Uhless Less Than Significant Mitigation Slgpificant No 1~".$~.,.i>!!\,\W"oQrtIJl.(ll>lMn.filj.J"S(ll{(ll.O$.. ..I""lMI. JrwomoX4te.d Im..aol Imoaol a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ./ air auality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ./ to an existing or projected air aualitv violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any ./ criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed Quantitative thresholds for ozorie precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ./ concentrations? . e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ./ of people? Comments: 3.a-e. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not impact or adversely effect air quality as they are minor modifications and clarifications to the existing Development Code necessary to implement the Code. There are no i-'\ proposed modifications that will adversely affect air quality. As a result, ho impacts are expected to ! occur. R:\Ordinmlces\Medical Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 5 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. WOl,lld the project? ..' PO\oQ!!~Jt~ t Pl\!~i;tli!'Uy 'SI9rifft~t.lt48~less '. teas'Than t $~,t::::o~nl Mitig~t1on Significant No . !.'W.",~ . , ' gli..jlj,S."".~, . ..' . "".., 'I'. ..L JD! .d . JillQ,aQ.! . [mO"l a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or v' through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat v' or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected v' wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruDtion, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native v' . resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or imoede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting .{ biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat . .{ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? . . 1 J Comments: 4.a-f. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not significantly affect important biologic resources. The proposed minor Development Code Amendments and clarifications are City wide and will not preclude an independent analysis of biological resources of a site specific development project. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of the City wide code amendments and clarifications. R:IOrd!nancesIMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY,doc 6 J , . . . 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: - r . Potentially PotentiaHy Significant Unless Less Than IS.$u.i;{S;;alil.d:SJJ~~orti.l1"';jJ}l/;l:wlatiQIl~$'Q:U~'i"''''.s,", swcwcant Miti9..c~~iQn SignlfJoant No '"~"i In~[n;eJiU;e:d ''''0.01 'moaet a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of . .(' a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of .(' an archaeoloaical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological .(' resource or site or uniaue qeoloaic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred .(' outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: .5.a-d. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecufa, will not adversely affect significant historical resources, archaeological, paleontological or geological features. No change or modification is being proposed that .would ruin or destroy any significant feature. The proposed minor Development Code Amendments and clarifications are City wide and will not preclude an independent analysis of a site specific development project. As a result, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. . R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 7 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: . Iss.ue.S:.aod::Su _ '.ulI.m iI.n~'l.IlD.ti~o;.So.u~.es.,. a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvin : i. The rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii. Stron seismic round shakin ? Iii. Seismic-related round failure, includin Ii uefaction? iv. Landslides? b. Result in. substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readin , subsidence, Ii uefaction or colla se? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or ro e ? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: PM"-Udlr ".."".Y Sl[n~~!l.~1 . .lill Ill>t. . ~ef.i$'_TIiran- '\ ~iln'ir_1 No . lOO' ..... .101 ....1 v' v' v' v' v' v' v' v' 6.a-e. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not expose people or property to any significant impacts or effects caused by geology or soils. The amendments are minor modifications and clarifications to the existing Development Code. Any future development would be subject to the Uniform Building Code and independent environmental analysis if deemed necessary pursuant to CEQA. As a result, no impacts are expected to occur as a result of the proposed City wide amendments and clarifications. . R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarljuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 8 , j 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: c- I Potentially / P~W~l1ti,a.lI.y Signlffeanl Unle,ss Less Tha,n .ls.su.~'$.od.,s'\Jo'Qi!IJj",I"I.im.i!llili1>SJi,,!O.. $i~"ljic.nt Mit!9ii.tio:n $t9.njfic~nt No "Ihlkact Incciri1btated 1l1JDact' Imoact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the ,(" environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the . ,(" environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ,(" acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- ~Uarter .mile of an existino or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of ,(" hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to . Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, . . .. would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ,(" where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the . project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workinq in.the proiect area? ) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ,(" -' the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workina in the proiect area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ,(" adopted emergency response plan or emergency . evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structurel:; to a significant risk or loss, ,(" injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or Where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 7.a-h. ,. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not expose area residents to any hazardous or materials not commonly transported through the City, nor will the proposed amendments and clarifications expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss involving wildland fires or interfere with an emergency response plan or evacuation plan. The proposed Development Code Amendments are intended to clarify the intent and provide minor modifications to the Development Code which currently acknowledges that development projects must comply with the above environmental hazardous and safety requirements pursuant to GEQA. As a result, no impacts are expected from this Development Code Amendment. R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 9 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: ..:it ~.,~ .. Sig l.E;!s.s Th.an \ IS$".'<M~s"""o"IO"iliif.)"l1.J"'it;:,.,t!l.s' ...... . \VlWH11 , .' .1 t\i1l>~'. . $Igjlfi!;;jnt N9-.IiQPliGt l.h-"lit a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge .( requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water aualiw? . . b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere .( . su.bstanlially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which oermits have been aranted\? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage Pl'!ttern of the site .( or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? . d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site .( or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in floodinn on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed .the .( capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage - systems or provide substantial additional sources of . oolluted 'runoff? . f. Require the preparation of a Water Quality Management .( Plan? g. Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as .( mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation man? . h. Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures which ,/ would imnede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ,/ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a I result of the failure of a levee or dam? If. Inundation 6V seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? I ,/ ) Comment: 8.a~j. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not affect the water quality, drainage patterns, degrade water quality, or increase flood hazard capacity. The proposed Development Code Amendments and clarifications will not change the direction of surface or ground water flows. As a result, no impacts are expected to occur. R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 10 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: ~ ( ) Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than ISSUe<Wla<liSll..i>lliiloiilJ:ifIiiJililalioI11Sotii".. . SigniflGant Mitigation Significant No . liJitr.li;t JIiCP~\'ij('a.:ted' h".act Ilf!oact a. Phvsicallv divide an established community? ./ b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ./ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project . (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ./ . natural community conservation plan? Comments: 9.a-c. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not physically divide an established community, conflict with the applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation, and does not conflict with any. applicable habitat plans. As a result, no impacts are expected to occur. ) R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 11 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a. ISlluascall\t$U '"<llliD JIii,!" "ifuf,sQUll<es Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral lan, s ecific Ian or other land use Ian? b. Comments: ~ \ ~~ Inf~,act .{ .{ 1 O.a-b. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not result in the loss of known mineral resources either locally or at a staie level. The proposed Development Code Amendments are simply to clarify existing standards within the Development Code and minor modifications to implement the intent of the Code. As a result, no effects are expected from this project. R:\Ordinances\Medical Martjuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 12 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: t '\. \ J a. ISSU.""1i\i>su . ,"Iljb~C ~~k.n\So . Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other a encies? Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive roundborne vibration or roundborne noise levels? A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the roO ect? A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? b. c. d. e. f. I"emf\a~ s., "'~.liO.'l .il.!!J1 .100'001 ~p :lm:.act y' y' y' y' y' y' )ornrnents: 11.a-f. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula and does not include an airport component and therefore, could not expose people to increased aircraft noise. In addition, the Development Code Amendments and clarifications will not affect existing or future noise standards as the amendments are intended to provide comprehensive and consistent implementation of the Code, and will not alter or modify any noise standards or requirements. As a result, no impacts are expected. R:IOrdinancesIMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 13 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: ,- '-'. j;~&1>iiltliY 'siii~.~~~s . ~,,~.,'rhil~ ( slliilli,,,,,,,t "Mmgilllbh Sigfliticallt No . . 1~.Ei.u.es..an,d.$"yPPQrtinaJaf.oEm..a1Ian'SQUr~. .Irona.t. 'n""';;~'at.~ ImnBcl 'mn~", a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either -t" directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, -t" necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace substantial numbers of people, neoessitating the -t" construction of replacement housina elsewhere? ) . Comments: 12.a-c. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula~ will not displace any housing units or local residents, nor are they expected to induce substantial population growth in the area. The minor modifications and clarifications are intended, in part, to allow larger secondary dwelling units which will help with the housing needs in the City. As a result, no impacts are expected to occur. R:\Or~'nan.es\Medi.al MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc .14 ~ f- \ 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facUities, need for new or physically Itered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental Impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potenti<;llly Roteotta11y Si9flj.fi~ant '~rifess less Than l's"..,aod,$uoo.o.rtih,,'I"f.riIlafi.~$~.u(.es. S:tgnmq~bt Mitilili:lJib:n SfQ'niiJdal'lt No 1fj,~~~1> Ino.,bbrilte.d Jrri";aot. tml'l,act a. Fire orotection? " b. Police protection? " c. Schools? " d. Parks? " e. Other oublic facilities? " Comments: 13.a-e. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not affect the demand for, or adversely effect, public services. Given the fact that the application is for minor Development Code amendments and clarifications of existing standards, no impacts are expected from this project. \ } R:\OrdioanceslMedical Marijuana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 15 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a. .ISS"""i'l'So ..dlii"i'ltl11aioThSo' ~J' Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse h sical effect on the environment? b. Comments: ) v' 14.a-b. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not affect. the demand for, or adversely effect, recreational facilities. No change or modification r.egarding parks or recreational facilities is being proposed as part of this application. As a result, no impacts are expected as a result of this project. R:\Ordinances\Medical Marijoana\CEQA INITIAL STUDY.doc 16 f \ 15. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC. Would the project: - ) '. ...... .. ...."'~~~ .f1011lmllil11y' .Sigiiifj~'ti.ll1.- less . -ke:S~:1Fh'an J.s~~anlil;SJj.~.ilfird.'fll~iiliiMi1'tl{.Uf,,~ < ... "./ . SWwWit' Miti2atioh . stine.ant No .' '.' r"~t.. Inol>"ib:.!1i'~d. ..a~" I",..c, a. 'Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in .' relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or conaestion at intersections)? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of .' service standard established by the county congestion manallement aaency for desianated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, . including either .' an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? . d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature .' (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or . incompatible uses le.a., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadeauate emeraency access? .' f. Result in inadequate parkina capacitv? .' g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs .' supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? . ". . ..- Comments:" r4s.a_g. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not impact area circulation. The intent of the proposed minor modifications and clarifications are intended to provide clarity and consistency with the existing standards and requirements of the Development Code. As a result, no impac::ts are expected to occur. R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarijuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY. doc 17 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: P01erili,l1Iy '. ,- .1 , PotentiaUy- Sigrllliqant-Unless Le.ss Than " , 1....ul<$;."~,S.u"".ain"tJ"l.i1i>.tJ"o,spi'",.., Slgnifi.Gant "Mitigation Slgnifieant No Imoo.. IQeQrri.QEatftd 'm.act 'm."'" a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the' .{ aoolicable Reaional Water QualitY Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or .{ wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water .{ drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the .{ project from existirig entitlements and resources, or are new or exnanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment .{ provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to .{ accommodate the nroiect's solid waste disnosal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and .( I reaulations related to solid waste? ) Comments: 16.a-g. The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, will not affect public utilities or service systems as it is not a part of the proposed amendments or clarifications. Therefore, no impacts are expected from this project. \ .' R:\Ordloaoces\Medical Marijuaoa\CEQA INITIAL STUOY.doc 18 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: ) a. b. c. ISI'l.ue:s"andiS.u " ,';rllljnlffifi:jJl1i~UQhr:S~tlJt.e.$" ~ "' Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California histo . or rehisto ? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current ro'ects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects? Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directl or indirect! ? Comments: Lelisl'f:!_I:ln . .~J,~nJUi:~#1 IlI]".l No ..IIll'llJ>i' -I" -I" -I" 17.a-c The proposed Ordinance, prohibiting Medical Marijuana Dispensaries in all zoning districts of the City of Temecula, to not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, habitat or result in adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. . The intent of the project is to provide consistency within the Development Code, remove ambiguity and. make minor modifications to implement the intent of the ,standards and regulations within the Development Code. Therefore, no adverse effect will result to the environment, habitat or human beings. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed,in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. . a. Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis. c. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. SOURCES 1. . City of Temecula General Plan. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report. R:IOrdinanceslMedical MarljuanalCEQA INITIAL STUDY,doc 19 HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP THOMAS B. BROWN - SBN 104254 2 AMELIA MIAZAD - SBN 224200 425 Market Street, 26th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 4 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 tbrown@hansonbridgett.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 CITY OF CONCORD 7 8 9 10 II AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, . STEPHEN DeANGELO, and ANDREW 12 GANN, . SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, MARTINEZ 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. No. C-05-02148 NOTICE OF DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 16 17 18 19 TO PLAINTIFFS AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendant. Date: Time: Dept.: Judge April 6, 2006 8:30 a.m. 30 Honorable Diana Becton-Smith CITY OF CONCORD, 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 6,2006 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as the 21 matter may be heard in Department 30 ofthe above-entitled Court, located at 725 Court Street, . 22 Martinez, California, Defendant City of Concord ("the City") will and hereby does move this 23 Court for an Order granting, without leave to amend, Defendants' Demurrer to Plaintiffs' First 24 'Amended Complaint and to each cause of action contained therein pursuant to California Code of 25 Civil Procedure sections 430.10 and 435(b). 26 27 28 NOTICE OF DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237049.1 This Demurrer will be made and is made and based upon the following: this Notice, the 2 accompanying Demurrer, the accompanying Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support 3 of Demurrer, the accompanying Request for Judicial Notice, on the records and files herein, and 4 on such other matter as the Court may consider at the time of hearing of the Demurrer. 5 6 DATED: February -LL2006 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP By; AMELIA MIAZAD Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CONCORD - 2 - NOTICE OF DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237049,1 I HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP THOMAS B. BROWN - SBN 104254 2 AMELIA MIAZAD - SBN 224200 425 Market Street, 26th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 4 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 tbrown@hansonbridgett.com 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 CITY OF CONCORD 7 . 8 9 10 II AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, STEPHEN DeANGELO, and ANDREW 12 GANN, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, MARTINEZ 13 Plaintiff, . No. C-05-02148 CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 15 16 17 18 19 TO PLAINTIFFS AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: Defendant. Date: Time: Dept.: Judge April 6, 2006 8:30 a.m. 30 Honorable Diana Becton-Smith .v. CITY OF CONCORD, 20 Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 430. I O(e) Defendant City of 21 Concord demurs to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint and all causes of action therein on the 22 ground that Plaintiffs fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a claim for relief for the reasons set 23 forth below. 24 //1 25 11/ 26 11/ 27 III 28 1/1 DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237077.1 I FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION 2 Violation of California Constitution, Article 11, ~ 7 and Government Code ~ 37100 3 la. The purported first cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 4 claim for violation of California Constitution, Article II, S 7 and Govenunent Code S 37100 5 because the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.c. section 801 et seq.)(''the CSA") preempts 6 California State laws pertaining to marijuana. 7 lb. The purported first cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 8 claim for violation of California Constitution, Article II, S 7 and Govenunent Code S 37100 9 because City of Concord Ordinance 05-9 ("the Ordinance") is narrowly drafted and is not 10 preempted by any California State law. II SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION 12 Violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (Government Code ~ 12955(1)) 13 2a. The purported second cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 14 claim for violation of California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (Govenunent Code S 15 12955(1)) ("FEHA") because FEHAonly applies to discrimination in employment or housing and 16 the Ordinance on its face does not in any manner address either housing or employment. 17 2b. The purported second cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 18 claim for violation of FEHA because FEHA does not protect the use or distribution of controlled 19 substances, such as marijuana, that are illegal under federal law. 20 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION 21. Violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code ~ 51) 22 3a. The purported third cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 23 claim for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code S 51)("Unruh") because Unruh does 24 not apply to legislative enactments by govenunental bodies. 25 3b. The purported third cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 26 claim for violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code S 51 )("Unruh") because Unruh does 27 not protect the use or distribution of controlled substances, such as marijuana, which is illegal 28 under federal law. - 2- DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237077.1 I The purported third cause of action fails facts sufficient to constitute a claim for 3c. 2 violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil Code 9 51)("Unruh") because Unruh does not 3 apply where another state law expressly authorizes the Ordinance. 4 3d. The purported third cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 5 claim for violation of Unruh because Unruh only protects arbitrary discrimination and the 6 Ordinance does not constitute arbitrary discrimination. 7 The purported third cause of action fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a 3e. 8 claim for violation of Unruh on behalf of Americans for Safe Access because there is no 9 associational standing under Unruh and Americans for Safe Access lack standing to bring a claim 10 for violation of Unruh. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: February ~ 2006 HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP By: ELlA MIAZAD Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CONCORD 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3 - DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237077.1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP THOMAS B. BROWN (SBN 104254) AMELIA MIAZAD (SBN 224200) 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 54 I -9366 tbrown@hansonbridgett.com amiazad(alhansonbridgett.com Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CONCORD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, MARTINEZ AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, STEPHEN DeANGELO, and ANDREW GANN, No. C-05-02148 DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CONCORD, Date: Time: Dept.: Judge April 6, 2006 8:30 a.m. 30 Honorable Diana Becton-Smith Defendant. . CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 22284.6/\237507.\ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 II. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS AND ARGUMENT ...........................~......................................I III. STATEMENT OF FACTS .......................~...........................................................................2 IV. ARGUMENT........................................................................................................................3 A. The City Enjoys Broad Constitutional Police Powers To Pass Ordinances Prohibiting Conduct Deemed Harmful or Offensive By The City Council Acting In Its Legislative Capacity. ...........................................................................3 Under The Supremacy Clause of The United States Constitution, The Federal Controlled Substances Act Preempts The Act And The MMP. ..................3 B. 1. 2. 3. The Controlled Substances Act.....................................................................4 C. The CSA Expressly Preempts The Act and the MMP..................................4 The CSA Also Preempts the Act and the MMP Under Conflict Preemption Principles. ................... ........................ ............................. ..........5 Even If Federal Law Did Not Preempt The Act And The MMP, Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action Fails Because These State Laws Do Not Preempt the Ordinance. ...................... ............... ............ ........................... .............................. ....... 7 1. The Act Is Limited In Scope And Does No More Than Create A Narrow Exemption From Criminal Prosecution.......................................... 7 2. The MMP Is Also Limited In Scope, And Does No More Than Create A Registry Of Qualified Medical Marijuana Users And A Narrow Exemption From Criminal Prosecution. ..........................................9 3, The Ordinance Does Not Duplicate Or Contradict The Act Or The MMP............................................................:................................................9 4. The Ordinance Does Not Enter A Field That Has Been Occupied By California State Law. ............................................................................10 Plaintiffs Overstate The Scope Of The Act And The MMP.......................12 5. D. Plaintiffs' Second Cause Of Action For Violation of The Fair Employment And Housing Act Fails Because FEHA Only Applies To Discrimination In Employment Or Housing, And Also Specifically Excludes The Unlawful UseOfControlled Substances Such As Marijuana. ...............................................13 1. FEHA Does Not Apply Because The Ordinance On Its Face Does Not Apply To Housing Or Employtnent.....................................................13 -i- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORJTIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 22284.611237507.1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IV. II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. FEHA Does Not Protect The Use Or Distribution Of Marijuana, Which Is Illegal Under That Federal Law. .................................................14 E. Plaintiffs' Third Cause Of Action Under Unruh Similarly Fails Because Unruh, Like FEHA, Does Not Protect The Illegal Use Of Controlled Substances, And Because The Ordinance Is An Exercise Of Reasonable Legislative Discretion. .......... ............... ...................... ..................... .............. ......,...14 I. Unruh Applies To Business Establishments, Not To Local Legislative Bodies.....................................:................................................ .14 2. Unruh Does Not Protect The Use Or Distribution Of Marijuana, Which Is Illegal Under Federal Law, Nor Does It Apply Where Another State Law Expressly Authorizes The Ordinance. .........................15 3. The Ordinance Does Not Violate Unruh.Because It Is Not Arbitrary And Is Based On A Compelling Societal Interest. .....................................15 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................15 - ii - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . 25 26 27 28 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Alfaro v. Terhune, 98 CaI.App.4th 492, 510-11 (2002)..............................................................................................3 Buhl v. Hannigan, 16 Cal.App.4th 1612, 1623-1624 (1993)..............................................................................14,15 Burnett v. San Francisco Police Department, 36 CaI. App. 4th 1177, 1191-1192 (1995)..................................................................................14 Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School District, 39 Cal.3d 878, 885 (1985) ........................................................................................................3,7 Carlin v. City of Palm Springs, 14 Cal.App.3d 706, 711 (1971) .............................;......................................................................3 Chavez v. Superior Court, 123 Cal.App.4th 104, 110 (2004) .................................................................................................8 Citizens for Uniform Laws v. County of Contra Costa, 233 Cal.App.3d 1468, 1473 (1991) ...................................................,..................................13,14 City ofOakiand v. Superior Court, 45 CaI.App.4th 740,.755-756 (1996) ............... ..... ........... ..................... .................... .............. ......3 Galvan v. Superior Court, 70 Cal.2d 851, 859 (1969) ..........................................................................................................10 Gonzales v. Raich, 125 S. Ct. 2195 (2005):.............................................................................................................4,6 Great W. Shows v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 853 (2002) ...........................................................................................................;.....12 Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV, 52 CaI.3d 1142, 1168-69 (1991).................................................................................................15 Horton v. City of Oakland, 82 CaI.App.4th 580, 589 (2000) ...........................................................................................10, II' IT Corp. v. Solano County Bd of Supervisors, I Cal.4th 81, 93 (1991) ...............................................................................................................11 Jevne v. Superior Court, 35 Cal.4th 935, 950 (2005) ...................,......................................................................................5, McCullah v. Southern Cal. Gas Co. 82 Cal.App.4th 495, 499 (2000) .................................................................................................14 -1- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIESIN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 22284.6/1237507. I I Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 V.S. 374, 383 (1992)........ .c........... ........,....... .................. ................... ................. .............. .....4 2 People ex rei. Lungren v. Peron, 3 59 Cal.App.4th 1383, 1394 (1997) ...................................................................................5,6,8,9 4 People v. Mower, 28 Cal.4th 457,470 (2002) .................................................................,.....................................8,9 5 6 7 People v. Trippet, 56 Cal.AppAth 1~32, 1550 (1997) ...............................................................................................8 People v. Urziceanu, 132 Cal.App.4th 747, 769 (2005) ...................................................................................5,8,9,13 8 9 Pernice v. City of Chicago, 237 F.3d 783, 785 (7th Cir. 2001) ..............................................................................................14 10' Schmidt v. Superior Court, 48 Ca1.3d 370, 382-283 (1989)...................................................................................................15 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co., 485 U.S. 293, 299c300 (1988) ......................................................................................................4 Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 4Cal.4th 893,897 (1993) ...........................................................................................7, 10, II, 12 Spanish Speaking Citizens' Found v. Low, 85 Cal. App. 4th 1179, 1240 (2000) ...........................................................................................14 United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 532 V.S. 483 (200 I )...... ....:..... ......... .............. ................. .... ..........:......... ................. .................. ...5 Valley Vista Services v. City of Monterey Park, 118 Cal.App.4th 881, 888 (2004) ....:............................................................................................9 Viva! International v. Adidas, 134 Cal.AppAth 133, 144 (2005) ..............:..................................................................................5 Statutes Compassionate Use Act, Health & Safety Code 22 ~11362.5, subd. (b)(I)(C) ..~.............................................................................................................1 23 21 V.S.C. ~ 801..........................................:......................................................................................4 24 21 V .S.C. ~ 873............... ................. ................ ................. ..................... .................. ................. ........ 5 25. 21 V.S.C. ~~ 841(a)(I), 844(a) ..........................................................................................................4 26 . ADA (42 U.S.C. ~ 12101 et seq. ....................................................................................................14. 27 .Cal. Civ. Code~. 51(c) ....................................................................................................................15 28 Health & Safety Code ~ 11362.5 (b)(2).............................:..........................................................1,5 -ii- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT' 1237507.1 Health & Safety Code ~ 11362.83 .......................................................,..........................................12 2 Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 V,S.C. ~ 701 et seq.).....................................................................14. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -iii - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORlTIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 I I. INTRODUCTION 2 Concerned about drug-related crime and the use of marijuana by those without medical 3 need, the City of Concord ("the City") exercised its broad constitutional police power and enacted 4 Ordinance 05-9 ("the Ordinance") to prohibit most medical marijuana dispensaries within the 5 City. In an effort to avoid any possible conflict with California law, the City narrowly drafted the 6 Ordinance to exempt California state licensed facilities. 7 Plaintiffs claim the Ordinance is preempted by the voter-enacted Proposition 215 and the 8 . subsequent legislatively-adopted Medical Marijuana Program, and that it violates the Fair 9' Employment and Housing and Unruh Acts. Plaintiffs are wrong as a matter of settled law. The 10 City respectfully requests that its demurrer be sustained without leave to amend. II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 II. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS AND ARGUMENT Article XI, section 7. of the California Constitution reserves to cities broad "police power" to determine how best to protect the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of its citizens. Aimed at preventing drug-related crimes and the use of marijuana by those without medical need, the Ordinance is a classic example of the proper exercise of this police power. Since the Ordinance is narrowly drafted and does not conflict with State law, there is no legal support for Plaintiffs' challenge to the City's exercise of its police powers here. Plaintiffs' first cause of action alleges violation of the California Constitution, Article II, section 7 and Government Code section 37100, which prohibit the enactnient of municipal laws that conflict with California law. Plaintiffs claim that. the Ordinance conflicts with, and is hence preempted by Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act; Health & Safety Code section 11362.5 ("the Act") and Health & Safety Code section 11362.7 et seq, the Medical Marijuana Program ("the MMP"). This cause of action fails for two reasons. First, the Act and the MMP are preempted by federal law since they conflict with the Controlled Substances Act ("the CSA") which makes the use of marijuana illegal under any circumstances. Second, even if federal law did not clearly preempt the Act and the MMP, the Ordinance does not duplicate, contradict or enter into a field fully occupied by the State, and thus is not preempted by the Act or the MMP. Indeed, in addressing drug-related crime and non-medical marijuana use, the Ordinance does - I - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORlTIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 exactly what the Act and the MMP expressly allow cities to do. 2 Plaintiffs' second cause of action alleges violation of Cali"fornia's Fair Employment and 3 Housing Act (Government Code S 12955(1)) ("FEHA"): Plaintiffs, two of whom 'allege they are 4 disabled, claim that by enacting the Ordinance, the City prevents them from obtaining 5 "medicine," and thus is discriminating against them in violation of FEHA. This cause of action 6 also fails for two reasons. First, FEHA only applies to discrimination in employment or housing. 7 The Ordinance, however, on its face does not in any manner address either housing or 8 employment. Second, even if FEHA did apply, it does not protect the use or distribution of 9 controlled substances, such as marijuana, that are illegal under federal law. 10 Plaintiffs' third cause of action alleges violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civil II Code S 51) ("Unruh"). Plaintiffs again claim that by enacting the Ordinance, the City is violating 12 Unruh by discriminating against them on the basis of their disability. This cause of action fails 13 for two reasons. First, as with the second cause of action under FEHA, it is not discrimination 14 under Unruh for a City to enact an ordinance that prohibits conduct that is both illegal under 15 federal law and expressly authorized by the Act. Second, the Ordinance does not violate Unruh 16 because it is reasonable, not arbitrary. Finally, Plaintiff Americans For Safe Access cannot assert 17 this cause of action because there is no associational standing under Unruh. 18 III. STATEMENT OF FACTS 19 On September 27, 2005, the Concord City Council adopted Ordinance 05-9 prohibiting 20 medical marijuana dispensaries. 1 The Council based its decision on recommendations from 21 medical professionals and the City's Police Department who concluded that these dispensaries are 22 crime-magnets and encourage the use of marijuana by those without medical need? 23 24 25 26 27 28 I Certified copies of Ordinance 05-9, the staff reports submitted to .the City Council, the Council Minutes, and the Benched materials presented to the City Council in cOllllection with the adoption of the ordinance, are attached as Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E respectively, to the accompanying Request for Judicial Notice. Evidence Code sections 451-452. 2 Dr. Fred J. Von Stieff, the Medical DireCtor of the center for Recovery Drug Unit at the Mt. Diablo Hospital and Dr. Wendel Brunner, the Director of the Contra Costa County Public Health Department, provided the City Council with professional medical and public health expertise on the lack of need for and problems associated with medical marijuana dispensaries. The Concord - 2 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 I Conscientious of California State laws allowing immunity from criminal prosecution for the use 2 of medical marijuana, the Council specifically exempted facilities licensed by the State, such as 3 clinics, healthcare facilities, residential care facilities, and hospice facilities. (Ordinance 05-9; 4 Concord Municipal Code section 18-330.) 5 6 A. 7 IV. ARGUMENT The City Enjoys Broad Constitutional Police Powers To Pass Ordinances Prohibiting Conduct Deemed Harmful or Offensive By The City Council Acting In Its Legislative Capacity. 8 Article XI, section 7 of the California Constitution gives cities broad power to "make and 9 enforce within [their] limits all local police, sanitary and other ordinances and regulations..." 10 The legislative "police power" of a city is as broad within the city limits as that of the California II state legislature. Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School District, 39 Ca1.3d 12 878, 885 (1985). In the exercise of its police power, a city has extensive discretion to declare 13 certain activities harmful to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare. City of 14 Oaklandv. Superior Court, 45 Cal.App.4th 740, 755-756 (1996); Carlin v. City of Palm Springs, 15 14 Cal.App.3d 706, 711 (1971). Courts presume local legislative acts to be valid, and "every 16 intendment is in favor of [their] validity." Alfaro v. Terhune, 98 Cal.App.4th 492,510-11 (2002). 17 The City's broad police power to enact the Ordinance is limited only if the Ordinance were 18 preempted by California law. As we establish below, this is not the case. Indeed, the Ordinance 19 addresses the two concerns the Legislature explicitly anticipated cities would confront: drug- 20 related crime and the use of marijuana by those without medical need. But before we respond to 21 Plaintiffs' flawed argument that the Ordinance violates California law, we first address the more 22 fundamental conclusion that the Act and the MMP themselves are preempted by the CSA. 23 B. 24 Under The Supremacy Clause of The United States Constitution, The Federal Controlled Substances Act Preempts The Act And The MMP. 25 The Supremacy Clause of Article VI of the United States Constitution grants Congress the 26 power to preempt state law. Under the doctrine of preemption, a federal law can displace state 27 Police Department also weighed in, and stated its opposition to the medical marijuana 28 dispensaries within the City, noting many crime-related problems. (RJN, Exh. D.) - 3 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 1 law through express preemption, implied preemption, or conflict. preemption. See e.g. 2 Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co., 485 U.S. 293,299-300 (1988). As we discuss below, the 3 CSA preempts these state laws under two of these three tests. 4 1. The Controlled Substances Act. 5 In 1970, Congress enacted the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act. 6 Title II of that Act, the Controlled Substances Act (the "CSA"), 21 U.S.C. 9 801, et seq., imposed 7 a "comprehensive regime to conquer drug abuse and to control the legitimate and illegitimate 8 traffic in controlled substances." To reach these goals, Congress created a regulatory system 9 . making it unlawful to manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess any controlled substance 10 except in a manner authorized by the CSA. 21 U.S.c. 99 841(a)(1), 844(a). The Supreme Court II has held that. under the CSA, marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use at all." 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gonzales v. Raieh, 125 S. Ct. 2195 (2005) (emphasis added). The CSA contains the following language revealing Congress' intent to preempt conflicting state law: Application of State Law. No provIsIOn of .this title shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of the Congress to occupy the field in which that provision operates, including criminal penalties, to the exclusion of any State law on the same subject matter which would otherwise be within the authority of the State, unless there is a positive conflict between that provision of this title and that Slate law so that the two cannot consistently stand together. (21 D.S.C. 903, emphasis added.) 2. The CSA Expresslv Preempts The Act and the MMP. Express preemption exists where Congress enacts an explicit statutory demand that state law be displaced. See Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 504 U.S. 374, 383 (1992). The CSA explicitly demands that state law be displaced when there is a "positive conflict" between the CSA and state law such that the two cannot consistently stand together. Here, as we discuss more fully below, there is clearly a positive conflict between the CSA and the Act and the MMP such that they cannot consistently stand together. In short, because the CSA makes it unlawful to manufacture, distribute, or possess marijuana for any reason whatsoever, while the Act and the MMP create a qualified defense from criminal prosecution under California State law, the Act - 4 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and the MMP are conflict with the plain terms of the CSA and are expressly preempted.3 TheCSA Also Preempts the Act and the MMP Under Conflict Preemption Principles. Conflict preemption arises under two circumstances: (1) when it is impossible for a 3. private party to comply with both federal and state law; or (2) under the circumstances of [ a] particular case, [the challenged state law] stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. See e.g. Jevne v. Superior Court, 35 Cal.4th 935, 950 (2005); Viva! International v. Adidas, 134 Cal.App.4th 133, 144 (2005). The CSA preempts these state laws under both circumstances. The CSA makes it a federal crime to cultivate, possess and/or distribute marijuana for any reason. People ex rel. Lungren v. Peron, 59 CaI.App.4th 1383, 1394 (1997). As the Supreme Court noted in United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 532 U.S. 483 (2001), the CSA lists marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug, which means that marijuana has no currently accepted medical use. 532 U.S. at 491. The Act and the MMP, on the other hand, purport to allow some persons to cultivate, possess and distribute marijuana under some circumstances. The entire premise of the Act, namely, that there are valid medical pUrposes for marijuana (Health & Safety Code section 11362.5), is directly at odds with the CSA. Therefore an individual's use or distribution of medical marijuana under the Act or the MMP necessarily violates the CSA. It is impossible to comply with both. The CSA also expressly provides for programs to encourage federal. officials to cooperate with state and local governmental law enforcement officials for the enforcement of the CSA' s criminal prohibition against scheduled drugs, including marijuana. 21 U.S.C. S 873. The Act, by contrast, encourages "the federal and state governments to implement a plan to provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in medical need of marijuana." SI1362.5, subd. (b)(1)(C); People v. Urziceanu, 132 Cal.App.4th 747, 769 (2005).4 3 The Ninth Circuit recently found express federal preemption based on very similar statutory language in Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. City o/Seattle, (226) DJDAR 1608. . 4 The Court in Viva! International v. Adidas, supra, emphasized the importance of such a federal interest in fostering cooperative efforts to promote the purposes of a federal program, and a state law's inconsistency with such efforts, in finding federal conflict preemption. 134 Cal.App.4th 133 (2005) - 5- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The ballot materials submitted to the voters make explicit that a primary purpose of Proposition 215 was to circumvent the CSNs proscription against the sale of marijuana: "Proposition 215 allows patients to cultivate. their own marijuana simply because federal laws prevent the sale of marijuana, and a state initiative cannot overrule those laws." See People ex reI. Lungren v. Peron, supra, 59 Cal. App. 4th 1383, 1393. Gonzales v. Raich also supports the conclusion that the CSA preempts the Act and the MMP. There in the context of its holding that the purely intrastate use of marijuana under the Act and the MMP fall within Congress' Commerce Clause power to proscribe under the CSA, the Court detailed how the Act and the MMP conflict with the goals of the CSA: Limiting the activity to marijuana possession and cultivation "in accordance with state law" cannot serve to place respondents' activities beyond congressional reach. The Supremacy Clause unambiguously provides that if there is any conflict between federal and state law, federal law shall prevail. [Citations and text omitted] That is so even if California's current controls ... are "[e]ffective," California's decision (made 34 years after the CSA was enacted) to impose "stric[t] controls" on the "cultivation and possession of marijuana for medical purposes," ...,. cannot retroactively divest Congress of its authority... Indeed, ... urgings to the contrary would turn the Supremacy Clause on its head. .. . 125 S.Ct. at 2212-2213. Finally, in determining whether a state law conflicts with a federal law by hindering the complete accomplishment of the federal law's objective, courts give "considerable weight" to the views of the federal agency charged with administering the federal law. Jevne v. Superior Court, supra, 35 Cal.4th 935, 958. The Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA"), the federal agency charged with enforcing the CSA, see .e.g., Gonzales v. Raich 125 S.Ct. 2195, 2203, has made clear its view that state medical marijuana laws like Proposition 215 and the MMP impede its ability to enforce the CSA. In testimony to Congress, for example, the DEA Deputy Assistant Administrator testified to Congress that state laws such as Proposition 215 have "caused conflict and confusion .among the law enforcement community," are "viewed as jeopardizing the historical cooperation between federal, state, and local drug enforcement officials," and "undercut enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act." 5 5 See the DEA report to Congress at the DENs website, http://www.dea.gov/oubs/cngrtestlct032701.htm. Another DEA publication, Speaking Out - 6 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 In short, it is impossible to comply with the Act and the MMP, on the one hand, and the 2 CSA on the other. And the Act and MMP plainly stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment of 3 the CSA's purposes and goals. The Act and the MMP are preempted accordingly. 4 C. 5 Even If Federal Law Did Not Preempt The Act And The MMP, Plaintiffs' First Cause of Action Fails Because These State Laws Do Not Preempt the Ordinance. 6 Plaintiffs' first cause of action claims that the Ordinance conflicts with and is preempted 7 by the Act and the MMP. Whether a local law conflicts with and is preempted by the laws of the 8 State is an issue of law that this Court may decide on demurrer. Candid Enterprises, supra, 9 9 Cal.3d 878, 885. 10 A local law conflicts with state law if it (I) duplicates, (2) contradicts, or (3) enters a field II which has been fully occupied by state law, whether expressly or by legislative implication. 12 Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 4 CalAth 893, 897 (1993).6 As we discuss below, 13 the Act and the MMP are limited in scope and do no more than create a narrow exception from 14 criminal prosecution and an attendant registration system. The Ordinance, which prohibits 15 medical marijuana dispensaries, does not duplicate, contradict or otherwise enter into a field fully 16 occupied by the State in enacting the Act and the MMP. In fact, the Ordinance was enacted to 17 address the exact issues the Act and MMP expressly allow cities to legislate on: drug-related 18 crime and use of marijuana by those without medical need. Health and Safety Code section 19 11362.5(b )(2). It is not preempted. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1. The Act Is Limited In Scope And Does No More Than Create A Narrow Exemption From Criminal Prosecution. The Act provides that Health and Safety Code sections 11357 and 11358, which mitke the Against Drug Legalization, similarly states that agency's concerns vis-a-vis drug legalization programs, characterizing them as an "attack" on federal drug policy. That publication also may be found on the website at http://www.dea.gov/demand/speakout/index.html. The City requests . the Court judicially notice this official report. (Moehring v. Thomas, 126.Cal. App. 4th 1515, 1523 (2005) (websites); Taylor v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 24 Cal. 3d 890, 898 (1979) (official report to Congress).) 6 The mere fact the state, in the exercise of its police power, has enacted certain regulations does not prohibit a municipality from imposing additional requirements, so long as no conflict exists between the two. (California Rifle and Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of West Hollywood, 66 Cill. App. 4th 1302 (1998).) - 7 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 I 2 3 4 . possession and cultivation of marijuana a crime, "shall not apply to a patient, or to a patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician." Because the Act does not refer to any other state law relating to marijuana--including Health and Safety Code section 11360, proscribing the sale of marijuana, it does not legalize the saleof marijuana to qualified patients or primary caregivers. People ex rel. Lungren v. Peron, 59 Cal.AppAth 1383, 1389 (1997). Nor does the Act create any exception to Health and Safety Code section 11360's related proscription against the transportation of marijuana. People v. Trippet, 56 Cal.AppAth 1532, 1550 (1997). The Act (unlike the subsequently-enacted MMP) also does not allow for collective cultivation and distribution of marijuana. People v. Urziceanu, 132 Cal.AppAth 747, 769 (2005). The Act does not even give a patient absolute immunity from arrest and prosecution . and only provides limited immunity allowing the patient or primary caregiver to raise a "medical use" defense to a state criminal prosecution. People v. Mower, 28 Cal.4th 457, 470 (2002); 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Chavez v. Superior Court, 123 Cal.AppAth 104, 110 (2004). Recently, in People v. Urziceanu, supra, the court summarized the scope of the Act: These cases teach us that the Compassionate Use Act is a narrowly drafted statute designed to allow a qualified patient and his or her primary caregiver to possess and cultivate marijuana for the patient's personal use despite the penal laws that outlaw these two . acts for all others. Further, the enactment of the Compassionate Use Act did not alter the other statutory prohibitions related to marijuana, including those that bar the transportation, possession for sale, and sale of marijuana. When the people of this state passed this act, they declined to decriminalize marijuana on a wholesale basis. As a result, the courts have consistently resisted attempts by advocates of medical marijuana to broaden the scope of these limited specific exceptions. We have repeatedly directed the proponents of this approach back to the Legislature and the' citizenry to address their perceived shortcomings with this law. 132 Cal.AppAth at 772-773 25 Finally, the Act expressly anticipates the enactment of additional local legislation. . It 26 provides: "Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede legislation prohibiting persons 27 from engaging in conduct that endangers others, nor to condone the diversion of marijuana for 28 - 8 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 I non-medical purposes." Health & Safety Code 9 11362.5 (b )(2).7 2 3 2. The MMP Is Also Limited In Scope. And Does No More Than Create A Registrv OfOualified Medical Mariiuana Users And A Narrow Exemption From Criminal Prosecution. 4 The MMP, enacted in 2003, is also limited and provides guidelines for qualifying patients 5 and their primary caregivers. The Legislature enacted the MMP because Proposition 215 lacked 6 specificity as to the strength, quality, or quantity of marijuana to be used for medical purposes. 7 People v. Mower, supra, 28 Cal.4th at pp. 471-474. The MMP further extends some of the Act's 8 limited protection from criminal liability. 8 And the MMP provides for a statewide registration 9 program to assist in the implementation of the Act's limited exemption from criminal liability. 10 See People v. Urziceanu, supra, 132 Cal.Appo4th at 782-783. Like the Act, the MMP anticipates II the enactment of additional local legislation and provides, "Nothing in this article shall prevent a 12 city or other local governing body from adopting and enforcing laws consistent with this article." 13 Health & Safety Code section 11362.83. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Ordinance Does Not Duplicate Or Contradict The Act Or The MMP. 3. Since the Ordinance obviously does not duplicate the Act or the MMP, the first question is whether the Ordinance "contradicts" those state laws. Local laws contradict state laws if they "prohibit what the statute commands or commands what it prohibits." Valley Vista Services v. City of Monterey Park, 118 Cal.Appo4th 881, 888 (2004)(internal citations omitted). Courts only find contradiction when the state law and a local act "are irreconcilable, clearly repugnant, and so inconsistent that the two cannot have concurrent operation." Id. (Emphasis added.) . Because the Ordinance does not seek to legalize anything that the State of California has 7 These concerns, and testimony that such non-medical uses were .common at dispensaries in other jurisdictions, informed the City Council's decision to enact Ordinance 05-9. (RJN, Exh. C.) The concern about non-medical marijuana use also has been recognized by the courts. See, e.g., People ex reI. Lungren v. Peron, supra, 59 Cal.Appo4th 1383, 1386-1387; Gonzales v. Raich, 125 S.Ct. 2195, 2214 no43. 8 While under Proposition 215 there is a qualified defense only to prosecution for cultivation and possession, the MMP extends the protections of the Act to possession for sale (911359), transportation or furnishing marijuana (911360), maintaining a location for unlawfully selling, giving away, or using controlled substances (911366), managing a location for the storage or distribution of any controlled substance for sale (911366.5), and limits the provisions declaring a building used for selling, storing, manufacturing, and distributing a controlled substance to be a nuisance (9 I ] 570). - 9- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 declared unlawful, the question is whether the Ordinance prohibits what the CSA or the MMP 2 command. It does not. The Ordinance cannot be said to contradict the Act and the MMP because 3 it confronts exactly what those laws left to cities to address: drug-related crime and non-medical 4 . marijuana use. Health and Safety Code section 11362.5(b)(2). 5 Even if the Ordinance were not thus expressly authorized by the Act and MMP, as noted 6 above, all the voters intended (and did) when they passed the Act was to allow seriously ill 7 patients and their caregivers to cultivate, possess and use limited amounts of marijuana without 8 fear of criminal liability (at least under California law). . And all the MMP does is create a 9 statewide registry and identification card program, and extend the immunity from criminal 10 prosecution to marijuana sales by collectives. That is it. The Ordinance does not undo this II exemption from criminal liability or invalidate the statewide registration system, but simply 12 prohibits most medical marijuana dispensaries while exempting most State-licensed facilities. In 13 . no manner may the Ordinance be characterized under the applicable standard as "irreconcilable" 14 with, or "clearly repugnant" to, the Act and the MMP. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Ordinance Does Not Enter A Field That Has Been Occupied Bv California State Law. The final test for preemption is whether the Ordinance enters a field which has been fully 4. . occupied by state law, either expressly or by implication. Sherwin-Williams, supra; Galvan v. Superior Court, 70 CaL2d 851, 859 (1969). Nothing in the Act or the MMP expressly states an intent to occupy the field of marijuana dispensaries. Thus, the question is whether legislation providing a limited exemption from criminal liability and a registration program to assist in the implementation of the exemption constitutes a clear indication of intent to also occupy the field of marijuana dispensaries sufficient to support a finding of implied preemption Horton v. City of Oakland, 82 CaLApp.4th 580, 589 (2000). The answer is no. There is a three-pronged test for determining an intent to impliedly occupy the field: (I) the subject matter has been so fully and completely covered by general law as to clearly indicate that it has become exclusively a matter of state concern; (2) the subject matter has been partially covered by general law couched in such terms as to indicate clearly that a paramount state - 10 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 concern will not tolerate further or additional local action; or (3) the subject matter has been partially covered by general law, and the subject is of such a nature that the adverse effect of a local ordinance on the transient citizens of the state outweighs the possible benefit to the municipality. Sherwin-Williams Co., supra, 4 Cal.4th 893,897.9 There is no implied preemptive intent under any of these three prongs because, as many courts have found, the Act and the MMP do no more than provide limited criminal immunity and an attendant registration system. They in no manner address whether or to what extent local governments retain their ability to control or prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries, where, as here, there are locally-justified concerns over drug-related crimes. It defies logic to conclude, as do Plaintiffs, that the Legislature intended to strip local governments of their police power merely by creating a limited exemption from criminal liability, (and a registration system to implement the exemption). Indeed, the law is to the contrary. Where, as here, state legislation concentrates on specific areas and leaves other areas untouched demonstrates "a legislative intent to permit local governments to continue to apply their police power according to the particular needs of their communities in areas not specifically preempted." Horton v. City of Oakland, 82 Cal.AppAth 580, 587 (2000). Moreover, it is settled law that courts will not find preemption by implication when the legislative scheme either permits or recognizes local regulation. IT Corp. v. Solano County Bd of Supervisors, I Cal.4th 81, 93; Candid Enterprises, 39 Cal.3d 878, 888 (1991). Here, as set forth above, the Act specifically anticipates local regulation to address the kinds of problems confronted by the Ordinance, drug-related crime and non-medical use. Health and Safety Code section I I 362.5(b)(2). The California Attorney General also has concluded that in enacting the MMP the Legislature did not intend to fully occupy the field of medical marijuana, because the MMP in 9 Courts approach claims of implied preemption carefully, because by definition they involve situations in which there is no express preemption. Hence the rule has developed that implied preemption can properly be found only when the circumstances "clearly indicate" a legislative intent to preempt." California Rifle & Pistoi Assn. v. City of West Hollywood, 66 Cal. App. 4th 1302,1317 (finding no implied legislative intent to preempt a city's ban on the sale of "Saturday Night Special" handguns in the face of extensive State laws regulating only the registration, licensing and many other aspects of firearm distribution)( emphasis added). - 11 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 22 .23 24 25 26 27 28 I fact expressly reserves to cities the power to enact "laws consistent with this article" (Health & 2 Safety Code S 11362.83). Thus, the extent of the Legislature's preemptive intention in enacting 3 theMMP was to occupy "a narrower, more specific field of regulation with respect to the use of 4 medical marijuana, namely, the establishment of a registry and identification card program 5 designed to facilitate the prompt identification of qualified patients and their designated primary 6 caregivers." (88 Op. Atty Gen. Cal. 113.) 7 The Supreme Court decision in Great W. Shows v. County of Los Angeles, 27 Cal.4th 853 8 (2002) is apropos. There, the Court was confronted with the argument that state laws regulating 9 the sale of firearms and gun shows preempted a county ordinance prohibiting gun and 10 ammunition sales on county property. In rejecting the preemption argument under the Sherwin- 11 Williams analysis, the Court framed tlie issue as follows: "Does state law compel counties to 12 allow their property to be used for gun shows at which guns and ammunition are. sold? We 13 conclude that it does not." 27 Cal. 4th at 858. In reaching this conclusion, the Court was careful 14 to recognize the limitations in the state gun and gun show regulations, how the County's 15 ordinance in no manner intruded into those narrowly-framed laws, and that under such 16 circumstances the Legislature is presumed not to have intended to limit the local legislative 17 exercise of the constitutional police power. 18 Here, the issue similarly may be framed "Does state law (the Act and the MMP) creating a 19 limited exemption from criminal liability for medical marijuana use compel cities to allow 20 dispensaries at which marijuana is distributed?" As the Supreme Court concluded in Great W. 21 Shows v. County of L.A, the answer here again is "no." 5. Plaintiffs Overstate The Scope Of The Act And The MMP. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint cites to section 11362.5(b)(l)(A) of the Act as support for their preemption claim. That section states that one purpose of the Act was "[t]o ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana..." (First Amended Complaint, page 5, lines 16-18.) In citing that language in support of their - 12 - CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 preemption claim, however, Plaintiffs not only ignore that the Act expressly authorizes the 2 Ordinance (section I 1362.5(b )(2)), they also invite the Court to take a leap of logic that the 3 appellate courts have rejected consistently. It is well-well settled that the act does not entitle 4 dispensaries "to create a stockpile of marijuana that is to be collectively distributed." People v. 5 Urziceanu, supra, 132 Cal.App.4th 747, 768. Indeed, Proposition 215 (unlike the MMP) did not 6 even create a defense to criminal prosecution for such collectives. [d. at 768-769. In short, it 7 now is settled law in California that the Act created no such right. 8 Plaintiffs' Complaint also cites to Urziceanu for the proposition that under the MMP 9 (Health & Safety Code section 11362.775), there now is such a right to form a collective to 10 furnish marijuana to qualified patients that divests cities of their authority to ban dispensaries. II (First Amended Complaint, page 8, lines 20-23.) Not so. As noted above, the only result of the 12 enactment of Section 11362.775 was to exempt collectives "from criminal sanctions for 13 possession for sale, transportation or furnishing marijuana, maintaining a location for unlawfully 14 selling, giving away, or using. controlled substances, managing a location for the storage, 15 distribution of any controlled substance for sale, and the laws declaring the use of property for 16 these purposes a nuisance." Urziceanu, supra, 132 Cal.App.4th 747, 785. Exempting collectives 17 from criminal liability is hardly, as Plaintiffs assert, tantamount to the creation of an affirmative . 18 right to engage in such activities where a local government prohibits them. And even if the 19 MMP, in creating an exemption from criminal liability, intended to create some "right," that in no 20 manner constitutes any indication, let alone a "clear" one, that the Legislature also intended to 21 compel cities to allow dispensaries, and thereby divest cities of their long-standing constitutional 22 police power. This is especially so given the Act's and the MMP's express authorization to cities 23 to address the very issues addressed by Concord's Ordinance. 24 D. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiffs' Second Cause Of Action For Violation of The Fair Employment And Housing Act Fails Because FEHA Only Applies To Discrimination In Employment Or Housing, And Also Specifically Excludes The Unlawful Use Of Controlled Substances Such As Marijuana. 1.. FEHA Does NotApplv Because The Ordinance On Its Face Does Not Applv To Housing Or Emplovment. FEHA applies only to discrimination in employment and housing. - 13- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORlTIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT Citizens for Uniform 1237507.1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II . 12 13 ]4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I Laws v. County of Contra Costa, 233 Cal.AppJd 1468, 1473 (199]). Because the Ordinance on 2 its face does not in any manner involve either housing or employment, FEHA does not apply. FEHA Does Not Protect The Use Or Distribution Of Mariiuana. Which Is Illegal Under That Federal Law. Even if FEHA applied, it does not protect the use or distribution of illegal drugs. FEHA is 2. modeled on the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. S 701 et seq.) and the ADA (42 U.S.C. S 12101 et seq.); courts have held that decisions interpreting those laws are relevant when interpreting similar provisions of FEHA. McCullah v. Southern Cal. Gas Co. (2000) 82 Cal.AppAth 495, 499. An employer does not violate the ADA by discharging an employee for . the use ofillegai drugs, even if the employee's violation occurred because ofa disability. Pernice v. City of Chicago, 237 FJd 783, 785 (7th Cir. 2001). Similarly here, even if the Ordinance involved housing or employment (it plainly does not), the ADA, and by extension FEHA, do not require' cities to surrender their constitutional police power to legislate to address harms attendant to illegal drug use, especially where, as here, the Legislature expressly envisioned that local agencies would do just that. Health and Safety Code section I I 362.5(b)(2). E. Plaintiffs' Third Cause Of Action Under Unruh Similarly Fails Because Unruh, Like FEHA, Does Not Protect The Illegal Use Of Controlled Substances, And Because The Ordinance Is An Exercise Of Reasonable Legislative Discretion.lO unruh Applies To Business Establishments. Not To Local Legislative Bodies. Unruh on its face applies to certain discriminatory actions against protected classes, including the disabled. Unruh does not apply to legislative enactments by governmental bodies. 1. Burnett v. San Francisco Police Department, 36 Cal. App. 4th] 177,1191-1192 (1995); see also Buhl v. Hannigan, 16 Cal.AppAth 1612, 1623-1624 (1993) (holding that Unruh applies to the provision of public accommodations by businesses, not to statewide safety legislation);' Spanish Speaking Citizens' Found v. Low, 85 Cal. App. 4th 1179, 1240 (2000); California Forms of Pleading and Practice, Volume 11, Civil Rights Discrimination In Business Establishments, Unruh Civil Rights Act, S 116.13, [3]--Legislative Enactments By Governmental Bodies, p.5. 10 There is no associational standing under Unruh. Therefore, plaintiff Americans for Safe Access have no standing to bring this cause of action. Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing v. Westwood Investors, 221 Cal.AppJd 1377, 1383 (199]). - 14- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507. I 2 3 Unruh Does Not Protect The Use Or Distribution Of Mariiuana, Which Is Illegal Under Federal Law, Nor Does It Apply Where Another State Law Expressly Authorizes The Ordinance. Like FEHA, Unruh specifically excludes illegal conduct from its protection: "This 2. 4 section shall not be construed to confer any right or priyilege on a person that is conditioned or 5 limited by law..." Cal. Ciy. Code section 51(c). Unruh, like FEHA, makes no distinction 6 between federal or state law. As explained above, because the use or distribution of marijuana is 7 illegal under federal law, the City did not violate Unruh by enacting legislation addressing 8 harmful impacts associated with such illegal drug use. 9 Unruh also does not prohibit acts that are expressly permitted by another statute. Schmidt 10 v. Superior Court, 48 Cal.3d 370, 382-283 (1989). Because Health and Safety Code section II 11362.5(b)(2) explicitly authorizes Concord's Ordinance, Unruh does not apply. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The Ordinance Does Not Violate Unruh Because It Is Not Arbitrary And Is Based On A Compelling Societal Interest. Although Unruh proscribes any form of arbitrary discrimination, certain types of 3. legislative distinctions are deemed '~reasonable" and, therefore, not arbitrary. See, e.g., Buh/ v. Hannigan, 16 Cal.App.4th 1612, 1623-24 (1993). Whether the discrimination is arbitrary is a question of law that can be decided on demurrer. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV, 52 Ca1.3d 1142, 1168-69 (1991). Plaintiffs' Unruh claim also fails because the Ordinance here, enacted out of a concern for increased drug-related crime, including the use of marijuana by those without medical need, likewise is patently reasonable, and thus does not constitute arbitrary discrimination. V. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, defendant City of Concord respectfully requests that its demurrer be sustained without leave to amend. 24 DATED: February /t ,2006 25 26 27 28 B: T A Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CONCORD - 15- CITY OF CONCORD'S MEMO OF POINTS AND AUTHORlTIES IN SUPPORT OF DEMURRER TO COMPLAINT 1237507.1 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I I AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, STEPHEN DeANGELO, and ANDREW 12 GANN, HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP THOMAS B. BROWN - SBN 104254 AMELIA MIAZAD - SBN 224200 425 Market Street, 26th Floor Sari Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 tbrown@hansonbridgett.com Attorneys fur Derendant CITY OF CONCORD SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, MARTINEZ No. C-05-02148 I3 Plaintiff, 14 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT . 15 16 17 CITY OF CONCORD, Date: Time: Dept.: Judge April 6, 2006 8:30 a.m. 30 Honorable Diana Becton-Smith Defendant. 18 This matter came before the Court upon notice duly and regularly given on the Demurrer 19 to the First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Preliminary I~unction, And Permanent . 20 I~unction filed by Plaintiffs Americans For Safe Access, Stephen DeAngelo, and Andrew Gann 21 against Defendant City of Concord ("the City"). Plaintiffs appeared by counsel and defendant 22 appeared by counsel. The Court having reviewed the pleadings filed by the parties, having heard 23 oral argument and good cause appearing, orders as follows: 24 IT IS ORDERED that the City's Demurrer is sustained without leave to amend as to the 25 First Amended Complaint. 26 1/1 27 III 28 11/ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237056.1 I IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint is hereby 2 dismissed with prejudice. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 . 17 18. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 . , 2006 By: JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT - 2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237056.1 ~ ~";'>'L I 2 HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP THOMAS B. BROWN - SBN 104254 AMELIAMIAZAD - SBN 224200 425 Market Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 777-3200 Facsimile: (4 I 5) 541-9366 tbrown@hansonbridgett.com 3 4 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6' CITY OF CONCORD 7 8 9 10 I I AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, STEPHEN DeANGELO, and ANDREW 12 GANN, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, MARTINEZ No. C-05-02148 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE RE DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 Plaintiff, . 14 v. 15 16 17 CITY OF CONCORD, Date: Time: Dept.: Judge April 6, 2006 8:30 a.m. 30 Honorable Diana Becton-Smith Defendant. 18 Pursuant to Evidence Code Sections 45 I and 452, Defendant City of Concord ("the City") . 19 respectfully requests that this Court take judicial notice of the following: 20 1. A certified copy of Ordinance 05-9 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Long Beach 21 Equities, Inc. v. County of Santa Cruz, 81 Cal.App.3d 244, 255; fn. 2 (1978). 22 2. . A certified copy of Staff Report to the City Council dated September 6, 2005 in 23 connection with the adoption of Ordinance 05-9 attached hereto as Exhibit B. Pan Pacific 24 Properties, Inc. v. County of Santa Cruz, 81 Cal.App.3d 244, 255, fn. 2 (1978). 25 3. Certified copies of Minutes from the City Council meetings of September 6, 2005, 26 September 27, 2005 and October 4,2005 and benched documents submitted to the City Clerk in 27 connection with the adoption of the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibits C, D and E. Pan 28 Pacific Properties, Inc. v. County of Santa Cruz, 81 Cal.App.3d 244, 255, fn. 2 (1978). REQUEST FOR mDICIAL NOTICE RE DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT I 23706U 9 DATED: February L, 2006 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I 4. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Congressional Testimony on 2 March 21, 2001 by Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Assistant Administrator of the Drug Enforcement 3 Administration before the House Committee on Government Reform and The Subcommittee on 4 Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources. (www.dea.gov/pubs/cngrtestl032701.htm.) 5 Moehring v. Thomas, 126 Cal. App. 4th ISIS, 1523 (2005) (websites); Taylor v. Superior Court 6 of Los Angeles County, 24 Cal. 3d 890, 898 (1979) (official report to Congress). 7 5. The DEA publication, Speaking Out Against Drug Legalization. 8 (www.dea.gov/demandlspeakoutJindex.htm) Moehring, supra, 126 Cal.AppAth 1515, 1523. HANSON BRIDGETT MARCUS VLAHOS & RUDY, LLP By: AMELIA MIAZAD Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CONCORD -2- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE RE DEFENDANT CITY OF CONCORD'S DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 1237061.1 Exhibit A o ORIGJNAL . 1 LCUZJ /YIa....- . City Clerk ncord, Caiifornla ORDINANCE NO. 05-9 2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICII)AL CODE CHAPTER 18, (BUSINESSES AND BUSINESS REGULA nONS), BY ADDING ARTICLE 3 XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES), PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN 4 THE CITY OF CONCORD 6 5 WHEREAS, the City Council 'ldopts this Article bascd upon thc following findings: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [7 18 19 20 E. 21 22 23 24 25 F. A. The voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codificd as Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seg. and entitled The Compassionate Use Act of 1996). The State enacted SB-420 in 2003 to clarify the scope of the Compassionate Use Act of B. 1996 and to allow cities and other governing bodies to adopt and forge rules and c. regulations consistent with SB-420, In May 2001, the United Btates Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Oakland Buyers' Cooperative and Jeffrey Jones holding that distribution of medical marijuana is illegal under the CSA and there is no medical necessity defense allowed under federal law. D, On June 6, 2005, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Gonzales v. Raich which held that Congress, under the Commerce Clause of the United Stales Constitution, has the authority and, under the Federal Controlled Substances Act 21. USC Section 841 (CSA), pciwer to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even though it would be in compliance with California law. In light of these decisions, the City Council finds that it would be in'consistent and contrary to the public health, safety, and welfare to permit the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries, as defined herein, within the City insofar as to permit such activities may subject the City and/or its officials and employees to prosecution under federal law and would otherwise constitute illegal activity under federal law. 26 medical marijuana, it is the intent of the Council to prohibit medical marijuana Until such inconsistency is resolved between the federal and state laws with respect to 28 . /1 27 dispensaries within the City of Concord. Ord. No. 05.9 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES 2 HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:. 3 Section 1. Chapter 18 (Businesses and Business Regulations), Article XI (Medical Marijuana 4 Dispensaries), is hereby added to read as follows: 5 Section 18-330. Definitions. 6 "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" or "Dispensary" means any facility or location, 7 whether fixed or mobile, where medical marijuana is made available to or distributed by or 8 distributed to one (I) or more of the following: a primary caregiver, a qualified patient, or a 9 patient with an identification card. All three of these terms are identified in StI;ct accordance 10 with California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 et seq. A "medical marijuana II dispensary" shall not include the following uses, as long as the location of such uses is 12 otherwise regulated by this code or applicable law: A clinic licensed pursuant to Chapter I of 13 Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; A healthcare facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 14 . .0fDivisions 2 of the Health and Safety Code; A facility licensed pursuant to Chapter 2 of 15 Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; A residential care facility for pel'sons with chronic J 6 Ii fe-threatening illness licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.0 I of Division 2 of the Health and 17 Safety Code; A residential care facility for the elderly licensed pursuant to Chapter 3.2 of 18 Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code; A residential hospice, or a home health agency 19 licensed pursuant to Chapter 8 of Di vision 2 of the Health and Safety Code, as long as such 20 use complies strictly with applicable law, including but not limited to, Health and Safety Code 21 Section 11362.5 et seq. 22 Section ]8-331. Medical Marijuana Dispensary as a Prohibited Use. 23 A medical marijuana dispensary as defined in Section 18-330 is prohibited in all zones 24 . and no conditional use permit shall be issued therefore. 25 Section 2. Any action or proceeding to attack. review, set aside, void or annul this ordinance 26 must be commenced and service made on the City no later than 90 days after its effective date. 27 Section 3. This Ordinance No. 05-9 shall become effective thirty (30) days following its 28 passage and adoption. In the event a summary of said Ordinance is published in lieu of the entire Oed. No. 05.9 2 27 28 ,I Ordinance, a certified copy of the fuJltext of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City 2 Clerk at least five (5) days plior to its adoption and within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, 3 including the vote of the Council members. Additionally, a summary prepared by the City Attorney's 4 Office shall be published once at least fi ve (5) days plior to Ihe date of adoption of this Ordinance and 5 once within fifteen (15) days after its passage and adoption, including the vote of the 6 Councilmembers, in the Contra Costa Times. a newspaper of general circulation in the City of 7 Concord. 8 9 10 ATTEST: 11 ~ """""- 12 13 14 (Seal) Mary Rae},Lehman City Cle~ - 15 16 17 18 Ordinance No. 05-9 was duly and regularly introduced at a regular joint meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency held on September 6,2005, and was thereafter duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular joint meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment 19 Agency held on September 27,2005 by the following vote: . 20 AYES: NOES: Counci Imembers - None Councilmembers - H. Allen, M. Peterson, W. Shinn, S. Bonilla 21 22 ABSTAIN: Councilmembers - None ABSENT: Councilmembers - L. Hoffmeister 23 24 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true and CO'l"ect copy of an ordinance duly ,md regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Concord, California. 25 26 Ord. No. 05-9 3 Exhibit B AGENDA rmM No.~~ TO TIlE HONORABLE MA YOR AND COUNCIL: REPORT TO MA YOR A\'f} COUNCIL Icalllly \on i'1Jfumani f/ SEP<\.. ~ DATF.: September 6,2005 SURmCT: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAIYJ'ER 18 (BUSINESS ANI) BUSINESS RRGULATIONS) OF THE CONCORD MUNICWAL CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA D1SI>ENSARIES) PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARI.JUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF CONCORD RellOrt in Brief In 1996, the Calif()miu voters enacted Proposition 215, which protects patients and their primury caregivers from prosecution under Culifomiu "lW if they possess or culiivate murijuuna to treat serious illnesses pursuant to a doctor's rccommendution. The State Legislature has enucted implementing legislation which allows quulitled putients .and caregivers to obtain identificution cards that insulate them from an"Cst for violations of State Juws 'peltaining to mmijuana. Alihough not exprcssly authotized under these laws, some businesses have established medical marijuunu dispensaries where quulitled patients und caregivers cun purchuse mmijuana for medicul use. One such fucility hus been "opened in Concord, and seveml individuals have contacted the City to inquire about establishing additional dispensmies. Federal law, howevcr, has long prohibitcd culiivulian, posscssion or disttibution of mmijuana. Congress has not changed this prohibition despite the pussage of medicul mmijuana laws in several states. The conflict hetween Fedeml and State law on this subject has created a dilemma for local govemments and their law enforcement agencies, particularly with regard to medical marijuana dispensaries. Some cities have allowed these businesses to proliferate with no attempt at regulation. Seveml cities have adopted zoning moratoria which prevent establishment of these facilities pending further sludy. Others have adopted ordinances which either establish regulations goveming the number, location and operation standards far these businesses or prohibit them aliogether. Although Proposition 2JS has been in effect for almost nine years, there is no indication of an imminent rcsolution of the clear conflict between Stare and Federal law. This' situation forces local govemments in Califamiu to consider adopting local ordinances either regularing or prohibiting mcdical mmijuana dispensaries. City staff recommends that the Council enact an ordinance prohibiting the establishment of any medical malijuana dispensaries within the City, consistent with Federal law. A\' ORf)J\,ANCE AMENDING CHAI'TER III (BUSINESS A:-.ID BUSI:\ESS REGULATIO;>;S) OJ'THE CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE BY A DOING ARTICLE Xl (MEDICAL MARI./UANA DISPENSARIES) PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN TilE CITY OF CONCORD September 6, 2005 Page 2 Backl!round Under thc Controlled Substances Act, ennclcd by Congress in 1970, mUlijuana is c1assitied as a Schedule I controlled Subslance. This classification is based on a determination that mwijuana: (I) has n high potential for abuse, (2) hils no eUITently accepted usc for medical trcatment, and (3) is not accepted as safe, even when used under medical supervision. This Federal law makes it illegal to impOlt, manufacture, diSl!ibute, possess, or use mUlijuana in the United States. In 1996, the people of the Stnte of C,lifomia passed Proposition 2/5, the Compassionate Use Act, with the stated intent of ensuling that seliously ill individuals have the light [0 obtain and use malijuana lor medical purposes when rccommended by a physician. This voter initiative exempts patients and their plim;lry caregivers from prosecution under State laws that otherwise prohibit the cullivation or possession of murij uann. Sholtly after the passage of Proposilion 215, the City Council adopted " moratorium ordinance prohibiting thcestablishmenl of medical mUlijuana dispensalies pending consideration of zoning regulations to address this land use. (OrdinaneeNos. 97-8 and 97-11.) This moratolium ordinance expired on July 17, 1998. The State Planning and Zoning Law allows a zoning momtolium to remain in effect for up to two yenrs, but prohibits the City from enacting a subsequent monltolium ordinance goveming the same subject mailer. (Govemment Code *65858.) When medical mUlijuana dispensUlies stwted nppeming in Oakland, Snn Fmncisco, and Santa Cruz, tbe Fedeml Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) took an aggressive role to close these businesses as being in violation of 'fcderal law. This enforcement activity resultcd in a number of significant court decisions. The tirst of these decisions was Ullited States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative, el "ell. (2001) 532 U.S. 483. In that case, the United States Supreme Court beld th~t there is no medical necessity exceplion to the prohibition aguinst possession and use of mu,ijuanu under fedel1ll law even when lhe palient is "seliously ill" and lacks altemate sources of relief. In People v. Mower (2002) 28 Ca1.4'" 457; the Cali fomi a Supreme Court held that although Proposition 2/5 exempts qualified individuals from certain State malijuana laws, it does not gl1lnt an absolute immunity from HIres!. Instead, it provides a limited immunity from prosecution and may provide a basis for a pretlial motion to set aside an indictment or a defense at trial. In 2003, tbe State Legislature passed S8 420, which estublishcd lbe Mcdical Marijuana Program. This legislation creates a voluntary system for qualified patients and their caregivers to obtain idcntitication cards tbat will insulate tbem from arrest for violalions of Stale law relating to marijuana. It does not exprcssly autholize establishment of medical malijuana dispensalies. More recently, the conflict between the Federal Controlled Substances Act and California's CompassiOnHte Use Act led to the United States Supreme Court decision in Gonza/es v. Raich (2005) 125 S. Ct. 220 I. In the Raiclt case, federal agents seized and destroyed malijuana plants'that were being grown for personal medical use. The plaintiffs sued to prohibit enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) to. the eXlent that it intelfered with their medical use of mHliju~na as permitted under California law. Tbe Ninth Circuit COUlt of Appe~ls held tbat federal law enforccment authorities could nO! enforce the Controlled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ]8 (BUS]NESS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF THE CONCORD MUNICII'AL CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES) PROHIIlITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF CONCORD September 6, 2005 Page 3 Substances Act against these individuals because it exceeded the scope of Congressional authority under the. Commerce Clause of the U.S.COnstilUtion. The Suprcme COUll reversed, holding that the Commcrcc Clause docs cmpower Congress to prohibit cultivation or use of marijuana for medical purposes authorizcd by Califomia law. Although the Supreme COUll'S analysis focuscd nan'Owly on the scope of Congressional authOlity under the Commerce Clause, the practical significance of this dceision is that Federal law enforcement officers may continue to cnforce Federal dlug laws against Californians who cultivate or use medical maJijuana. However, the case did not expressly mle on the question whether Proposition 215 and SB 480 are preempted by Federal law. Shortly after the Raiclz decision eame down, the State Department of Health Services brietly stopped issuing medical marijuana identification cards due to concem that issuing such cards might subject its employees to prosecution for aiding and abetting the possession or cultivation of marijuana in violation of Federal law. DIIS requested the State Attomey General to provide legal advice on this issue. The Attorney General responded with a letter advising DHS that its employees were not in danger of federal prosecution and were still obligatcdtocontinuc ean'ying outthcir statutory duties related to implcmcntation of the mcdical marijuana identification card program Notwithstanding the DEA 's enforccmcnt ellons, medical mmijuana dispensaries havc continued 10 be established, paJlieularly within thc cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Bcrkeley. There is at Icast one business operating in Concord in the downtown. Therc havc been several infonnal inquilies about establishing additional medical marijuana dispensmies within the City. This increasing interest may in pan bc a result of regulatory effons here and in other 10caljUlisdictions. Discussinn Based on an infOlmal sUlvey, it appears that several local governments in Northem California al'C taking action to address medical marijuana dispensaries. The City of Oakland pennits the establishment of medical marijuana dispensUlies, but limits the total number to four within that City. Similarly, the Cily of Berkeley recently amended its ordinance to limit the number of pennitted dispensarics to thl'Ce. Other cities including EI Cenito, Fremont,PinOle and Pleasant Hill have adopted temporary moratoriums in order to detennine whether and how they will regulate these facilities. The City of Maninez has an ordinance that pennits and regulates medical marijuana dispensaries within identified commercial districts. Other cities also regulate the establishment of medical marijuana distribution facilities. The City of Elk Grove recently adopted an ordinance which contains not only zoning regulations, but also regulates the operators and employees of these facilities. Alameda County recently approved a plan to permit three new medical marijuana facilities in specitied locations within the County. The plan includes background checks and locational restrictions. AN ORDINANCE A:\1E:\DING CHAPTER ]8 (BUSINESS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF THE CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARl./UANA DlSPENSARlES) PROHIIlITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARI./UANA DISPENSARIES WITI-IIN TUE CITY OF CONCOR() Septcmbcr 6,2005 Page 4 The City of Roseville recently repealed its ordinance which allowed medical marijuana dispensaries to operate within some pans of the city. On June 22, the City intmduced an ordinance pmhibiting the cstablishmcnt of medical mwijuana dispensarics and dcclming it a misdcmcanor to violme the ordinancc. Thc Modesto City Council will consider a proposed ordinance prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries at its Scptcmber 6'11 meeting. . We are aware of four other citics that prohibit thc cstablishmem of medical marijuana dispensalies: . the cities of Fresno, Lincoln, Rocklin, and Susanville. Fresno has been sued by Americans for Safe Access and another named plaintiff who contend that the Fresno ordinance violates Proposition 215. In light of the Raich and CWlIIibis Buyers' Cooperative decisions, we believe that the City of !-'resno will be in a stmng legal position to successfully defend its ordinance. Law enforcement agencies have documented that the establishment of medical mUlijuana dispensUlies can cause adverse secondary effects in the community such as increased crime. Recently a medical marijuana dispensUlY located in unincorporated San Leandro Was robbed at gunpoint. One of the alleged perpetrators of . the crime was shot by an. employee and later died. In City staff's view, Ihe most appropriate response to the proliferation of mcdical malijuana dispcnswics is to adopt an ordinance prohibiting thcsc facilities entirely within Concord, The possession and distlibution of marijuana, even for medical purposes, plainly is unlawful under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. In the absence of a local ordinance, these facilities may continue to be established and operated, subject to discretionalY enforcement effotlS by Federal authOlities which mayor may not occur. The alternative of establishing land use and operational regulations for medical marijuana dispensaries would pUlthe City in the position of approving an activity which violates Federal law. If Ihc City Council decides to pursue the altemativc of adopting rcgulations limiting, but nOI prohibiting, establishment of medical mUlijuana businesses, then staff recommends examining measures such as designating the zoning districts where the facilities are allowed, requiting discretionary review of pmposed facilities thmugh a use pelmit process, prohibiting establishment within a specified distance from sensitive uses such as schools, and requiring background checks for operators. Refen'al to a Council Committee for . funher discussion would be appropriate if Council wishes to consider this alternative. . Fiscal Inmact By pennitting medica) marijuana businesses to locate in Concord, the City could gencrate some minimal revenue in the fonn of business license and sales taxes. The .sale of marijuana is taxable according to the State Board of Equalization. There would be increased costs in regulating, licensing and processing background checks on operators and employees of medical marijuana dispensaries. These costs could potentially be offset by fees. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER ]8 (BUSINESS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) OF THE CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES) PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF CONCORD Seplcmbcr 6, 2005 Page 5 Public Contact The agenda has been.posted as required by Jaw. Individuals requesting special notice of this meeting have becn given a copy of the agenda and this repon. Alternative Courses of Action I. Introduce Ordinance 05-9 prohibiting the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the Ci ty of Concord. 2. Refer the matter to a Council Committee for the formulation of an ordinance that regulates medical marijuana dispensaries through land use controls and operational restrictions. 3. Take no action and gi ve funher direction to City staff. Recommendation for Aetion Introduce Ordinance 05.9 prohibiting the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Concord by reading of the title only and waiving further reading thereof. Prepared by: Mark T. Boehme AssistaJ1l City Allomey Lydia E. u Borg Cily Manager Reviewed by: Craig Labadie City Allomey Enclosure: Attachment I - Ordinance 05.9 Exhibit C I I I I certify thet th. 1.1. a true ":r~ Aidocument~~~ ~ k:.~Ifef.;k S .~ ~-'.'Cityofconcord,CaIlfom'a . REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE CONCORD CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE CONCORD, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 The Concord City Council and Redevelopment Agency met in a regular joint meeting on Tuesday, September 6, 2005 in closed session to confer with Legal Counsel to discuss exposure to potential litigation against the City pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b): Two pending claims filed by EaR Legacy Partners 2000 Concord LLC against Concord Redevelopment Agency and City of Concord. The meeting convened at 5:40 p.m. in the City Council Conference Room, Mayor/Agencymember Hoffmeister presiding. There were no public c(lmments. The meet recessed at 6:10 p.m. to reconvene in the Council Chamber. The Concord City Council and Redevelopment Agency convened in a regular joint meeting at 6:38 p.m. with Mayor/Agencymember Hoffmeister presiding. The pledge to the flag was led by Councilmember Shinn. Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Couneil Minutes of September 26, 1966. ROLL CALL COUNCILMEMBERS PRESENT: Helen Allen, Susan Bonilla, Mark Peterson, Bill Shinn, Laura Hoffmeister COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: None Lydia Du Borg, City Manager; Mary Rae Lehman, City Clerk; Craig Labadie, City Attorney; Mark Deven, Assistant City Manager; David Livingston, Chief of Police; Cherie Rosenquist, Director of Human Resources; Oamar Khan, Director of Public Works- Maintenance Services; Alex Pascual, Director ot Public Works-Engineering Services MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WHO ADDRESSED COUNCtL: Joseph V. A. Partansky, Concord; Cary McReynolds. Concord; Pedro Cruzado, Pitts burg; Isreal Vetez, Pitts burg; Jeff Jones, Oakland; Brandon Semien, Pitlsburg; Brian Rodriquez, Concord; Robin Sidhi, . Concord; Charles Martin, Antioch; Demetrio Ramirez, Concord; David Bickford, Concord; Kevin Brown, Concord; Kirk Shelby, Concord; Daryl Bergman, Concord; Andrew Gann, Concord; JOhn.Harrison; Concord; Eugene T. Meadows, Concord; William McPike, Auberry PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Joseph V. A. Partansky encouraged residents to attend the Civic Engagement series at the Pleasant Hill Library featuring "California Rising - Life and Times of Pat Brown" which begins at 7:00 p.m. on September 7, 2005. ,....--- -. ....----.--. ..---..-..-.......--. ....... --. ....-. - .....-.... City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Hoffmeister announced nine openings on the Commission on Aging, nine openings on the Community Services Commission, seven openings on the Human Relations Commission, and three openings on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission each with staggered terms, and set Friday, November 4, 2005 as the deadline lor receipt of applications by the Administrative Services Coordinator. Mayor Hoffmeister announced the Red Cross and the Salvation Army would be receiving donations to benefit the Katrina Hurricane victims during the September 17th Thursday Evening Music and Market Series. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2005. Motion was made by Ailen and seconded by Bonilla to approve the minutes July 19, AGREEMENT WITH NORTEK - Comouter Aided Disoatch (CADI Svstem Motionwas made by Ailen and seconded by Bonilla to approve an agreement with Nortek in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to serve as project manager and to implement a Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) System; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. AGREEMENT WITH MOTOROLA - Maintenance of Mobile Data ComDuter Hardware Motion was made by Ailen and seconded by Bonilla to approve an agreement with Motorola to perform maintenance of hardware for the mobile data computers at a cost of $117,357.72; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. SETTING FOR PUBLIC HEARING _ Concord Boulevard Rezonino Motion was made by Ailen and seconded by Bonilla to set a public hearing for Tuesday, September 27, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to consider an application to rezone three parcels, 3554, 3556, and 3600 Concord Boulevard, from Single Family Residential to Apartment and Professionai Office District; Assessor Parcel Nos. 113-11 '-051, 113-111-063, and 114-370-060. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-60 - Permit Parkino on Balhan Drive Between Liohtwood Drive and Park Hiohlands Boulevard Motion was made by Ailen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Resolution 05-60 entitled, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZtNG PERMIT PARKING ON BALHAN DRIVE BETWEEN L1GHTWOOD DRIVE AND PARK HIGHLANDS BOULEVARD," authorizing permit parking on Balhan Drive between Lightwood Drive and Park Highlands Boulevard. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. 2 I I I I I I City CouneiVRedEivelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OS-58 - Aoprovino the Final Map and Subdivision Aoreement for Tract 8870, Renaissance Souare Condominiums Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Resolution 05-58 entitled, 'A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR SUBDIVISION 8870, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 126-062-010," approvin9 the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Tract 8870, Renaissance Square Condominiums, located at 1851 Galindo Street at Willow Pass Road; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-59 - Approvlno the Final Map and Subdivision Aareement for Tract 8819. Granada Glen Subdivision Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Resolution OS-59 entitled, 'A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR SUBDIVISION 8819. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 114-154-018," approving the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Tract 8819, Granada Glen Subdivision, located at 3989 Concord Boulevard; and authorizing the City Manager to execute. the agreement. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. . AW ARD OF CONTRACT - Project 2017. Installation of Heaters at Concord Communllv Pool The following bid was opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 19, 2005: Pool Scene, Inc. $ 80,500 Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to award the contract for Project No. 2017, Installation of Heaters at Concord Community Pool, to Pool Scene, Inc. of Sacrament as the lowest responSible bidder in the amount of $80,500, and to approve a related budget transfer in the amount of $41,000. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS - proiect No. 1869. Iron Horse Trail Gap Closure Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to accept improvements for Project 1869, Iron Horse trail Gap Closure (Bancroft/Hookston), constructed by Grade Tech of San Ramon: and to direetthe City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTtON OF REZONING ORDtNANCE 05-425.4 - Villa De La Vista Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Rezoning Ordinance 05- 425.4 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AS FOLLOWS: VILLA DE LA VISTA REZONING (RZ 04-002) OF PARCEL 132-020-035, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1491 LA VISTA AVENUE FROM M-1.8 (MEDtUM DENSITY MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL) TO PO (PLANNED DISTRICT). Motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Council. AMENDED CAPITAL PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH FIRST 5 CONTACOSTA CHILDREN AND FAMILIES COMMISSION - Fundlno the First 5 Center Modular Bulldino Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to approve an amendment to the Capital Purchase Agreement with First 5 Contra Costa Children and Families Commission for funding of the First 5 Center modular building, and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement amendment. Motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Council. 3 ___........_.._ U_Ud~ ......_.n __...__.__ . .....n_ ~.._ ._______ City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 AGREEMENT WITH THE CONCORD POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCATION - Removed from the Calendar I This item was removed from the calendar at the request of the Concord Police Officers Association. AWARD OF CONTRACT - Proieet No. 1284.02. Removal of Barriers to the Mobilitv tmoaired. Prolect No. 1285.02. Curb. Gutter. and Sidewalk Reoair Prooram. and Proiect No. 2002. Bus Benches This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar at the request of Joseph V. A. Partansky who stated that he would like to see benches installed at loeations other than bus stops. Motion was made by Bonilla and seconded by Peterson to award a construction contract in the amount of $160,505 for Project No. 1284.02, Removal of Barriers to the Mobility impaired (FY 2005.06); Project No. 1285.02, Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repair Program (FY 2005-06); and Project No. 2002, Bus Benches; to SpenCon Construction, Inc. of Foster City. Motion was passed by unanimous vote of the Council. . ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-61 - Offer of Reward Chief of Police David Livingston presented a report, referencing his memorandum dated September 6, 2005, regarding a July 24, 2005, ambush attempt on the life of Jose Rosales in the rear parking lot of the EI Rancho Restaurant and Bar, 1450 Monument Blvd., and requested that the Council authorize a reward of up to $5,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible and further stated that the EI Rancho Restaurant would mateh the offer. I Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Peterson to adopt Resolution 05-61 entitled, "A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A REWARD NOT TO EXCEED $5,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO THE ARREST AND CONVICTION OF THE PERSON OR PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE: ATTEMPTED MURDER OF JOSE ROSALES ON OR ABOUT JULY 24, 2005." Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-68 - Namino the Cltv Council as the Local Redevelooment Authoritv for the Concord Naval Weaoons Station City Manager Lydia Du Borg presented a report, referring to her memorandum dated September 6,2005, recommending that the City Council request that the Department of Defense, through the Office of Eeonomic Adjustment, recognize the City Council of the City of Concord as the Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA) for the Concord Naval Weapons Station based on the fact that the portion of the Naval Weapons Station identified for ciosure lies completely within the jurisdiCtion of the City. She further stated that the City Council, as the duly elected body of the City of Concord, is the body having zoning authority over the inland portion of the Naval Weapons Station, and as the LRA, would be responsible for preparing the Reuse Plan for the Concord Navat Weapons Station. Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Resolution 05-68 entitled. "A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, THROUGH THE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUSTMENT, TO RECOGNIZE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD AS THE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AUTH'ORITY FOR THE CONCORD NAVAL WEAPONS STATION (PUBLIC LAW 101-510; 32 CFR Part 174; 32 CFR Part 175; 32 CFR Part 176) I 4 I I I City CouncillRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 05-8 - Adoption of 2004 California Electrical Code. Title 24 The notice of public hearing was published In the Contra Costa Times on August 17, and August 23, 2005 and posted In the Civic Center posting cabinet on August 17, 2005. Building Official Vance Phillips presented a report, referring to. his memorandum dated September 6,2005, regarding amending Chapter 14, Article VII, Section 14-181 and deleting sections 14-183 and 14-184 of the Concord Municipal Code. He stated that the City of Concord was presentiy using the 2001 California Electrical Code and that adoption of the 2004 Eleetrical Code would allow the public to avail themselves to current health and safety provisions revised under the new code. . The public hearing was opened and closed without comment. Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to introduce Ordinance 05-8 by reading of the title only and waiving further reading, entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14, BUILDINGS AND BUtLDING RGULATIONS, ARTICLE VII, ELECTRICAL CODE, SECTION 14-181 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE 2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND DELETING SECTIONS 14-183 AND 14-184 OF THE CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE." The City Attorney read the ordinance title. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-6042.2 - Amendment to the Master Fees and Charoes _ Park Land Dedication Fees The notice of public hearing was published in the Contra Costa Times on August 17, and August 23, 2005 and posted in the Civic Center posting cabinet on August 17, 2005. Director of Public Works - Engineering Services Alex Pascual presented a report, referring to his memorandum dated September 6, 2005, regarding a proposed amendment to the Master Fees and Charges Resolution to Increase Park Land In-lieu Fees, phasing the overall increase over a five-year period. He stated tha1 the Quimby Act and AB 1600, two State laws, gives cities authority to impose the fees and that the Council Committee on Policy Devetopment and Internal Operations recommended the Increase to meet the park and recreation needs of our community. He further stated that the City has 26 parkS and had not adjusted the fees since 1994. The public hearing was opened. Cary McReynolds, representing Anderson and Bonnifield Law Firm, stated that in his opinion the fee should be based on park land acquisition costs, not on property values, because the City will not buy high density land for a park. The public hearing was closed. Following comments by the Council, a motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Hoffmeister to adopt Resolution 05-6042.4, entitled "A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE RESOLUTION OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR VARIOUS MUNICIPAL SERVICES, ITEM D.29, PARK LAND IN-LIEU FEES." Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. The Council recessed at 7:40 p.m. and reeonvened at 7:52 p.m. 5 , City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 JOINT CITY COUNCIU REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS AW ARC OF CONTRACT - Proiect 2018. Demolition of Redeveiopment Properties. Ceramic Studio. and Park Restrooms The following bids were opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 28,2005: Della Oilfield Service, Inc. Yelton Company, Inc. Evans Brothers, Ine. V.E.M. General Engineering, Inc. Thomas D. Euchner Co., Inc. Dunn Landscape Co. $166,170.00 191,440.55 205,900.00 207,260.00 228.245.00 234,165.00 Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Bonilla to award a building demolition eontractln the amount of $166,170 to Delta Oilfield Services, Inc. of Woodland as the lowest responsible bidder for Project No. 2018, Demolition of Redevelopment Properties, Ceramic Studio, and Park Restrooms, and approving a related budget transfer in the amount of $211,500. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Bonilla, Shinn, Hoffmeister NOES: None ABSENT: Allen, Peterson SETTING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment of Cisoosition and Development Aoreement- Concord Redevelopment Aoencv and Leaacv Partners 2273 LLC . Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Bonilla set a public hearing on Tuesday, September 27,2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to consider the amendment of the . November 2000 Disposition and Development Agreement between the Concord Redevelopment Agency and Legacy Partners 2273 LLC by adding a provision eliminating the tax increment rebate if the project converted to condominiums, and to remove provisions that provide for deferred participation payments to the Agency. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Bonilla, Shinn, Hoffmeister NOES: None ABSENT: Allen, Peterson SETTING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - Emeroencv Mobllehome Rental Assistance Prooram for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodoes Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Bonilla set a public hearing on Tuesday, September 27, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to consider the transfer of funds from Capital Improvement Project No. P1168, Affordable Housing Infrastructure, to Emergency Mobllehome Rental Assistanee for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodges, a new project, and amend the Redevelopment Agency Housing Set.Aside 2005-06 Budget and 10.Year Ptan. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Bonilla, Shinn, Hoffmeister NOES: None ABSENT: Allen, Peterson 6 I I I I I I City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 6, 2005 INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCE 05.9 - Prooosed Amendment to Concord Municioal Code- Prohibition of Medical Marijuana Disoensaries The notice of publie hearing was published in the Contra Costa Times and posted in the public posting cabinet at the Civic Center on Augusl26, 2005. Assistant City Attorney Mark Boehme gave a report, referring to his memorandum dated September 6, 2005, stating that while California voters had enacted Proposition 215 in 1996 allowing qualified patients and caregivers to possess and cultivate marijuana to treat serious Illnesses pursua"t to a doctor's recommendation, and were Insulated from prosecution under California's drug laws, the Federal law stili prohibits cultivation, possession, or distribution of rnariJuana. He cited the position several California cities have taken on the issue of medieal marijuana dispensaries and proposed the Council introduce an ordinance to prohibit dispensaries in the City of Concord or option to examine measures which would limit the number of dispensaries In the City. Following questions and comments by of the Council, the public hearing was opened. Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky stated his support of having medical marijuana dispensaries available to patients in their own community and suggested a study be done of the issue. He also stated that a booklet regarding the benefits of marijuana use to patients entitled, "Patients in the Crossfire," is available In the public library. Brandon Semien, Eugene T. Meadows, John Harrison, Andrew Gann, Daryl Bergman, Israel Velez, Pedro Cruzado, David Bickford, Charles Martin, Robin Sidhl and Brian Rodriquez each shared personal stories about the health benefits they have obtained by using medical marijuana and the convenience of having a dispensary near their homes. Kirk Shetby expressed his concern over the increased traffic at a medical marijuana dispensary operating near his place of business. Kevin Brown stated that MariCare, a medical marijuana dispensary operating near his place of business, had adjusted to the community and that he had not seen any adverse effects from the operation. . Jeff Jones, Director of the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative, reeommended the City Council postpone any immediate action and consider proper regulation of dispensaries instead of prohibition. Demetrio Ramirez, owner of MariCare, a medical marijuana dispensary operating in the City of Concord without a business license, expressed his desire to be an example of a well run dispensary In the community, stating that he would like the Council to study the matter in committee and work out a way for his business to operate legally in the community. In addition. he answered several questions posed by the City Council about his present operation. William McPike, attorney at law, shared his opinions and experience with medical marijuana dispensaries and encouraged the Council set up a committee to study the matter further. Cary McReynolds, legal Counsel for MariCare in the relocation of the medical marijuana dispensary, expressed his opinions about a properly operated dispensary versus the unlawful acquisition and use of marijuana, and encouraged the Council to carefully look at the issue of prohibition. The public hearing was closed 7 , City CouneillRedevelopment Ageney Minutes September 6, 2005 Councilmembers Allen and Bonilla suggested the issue of allowing or prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries be studied at the committee level. Councilmember Peterson stated that the law says marijuana use and sales are iliegal. Councilmember Shinn objected to the fact that a business would operate without support of a business license, and questioned why pharmacies and medical elinlcs didn't dispense marijuana. He stated that he supported review of the issue at the committee tevel. Mayor Hoffmeister expressed her. concern that delaying action on the ordinance to take the matter to committee would allow others to set up a business In the community and asked City Attorney Craig Labadie for an opinion. City Attorney Labadie explained that the City had received Inquiries from others who desired to set up businesses in the community. A motion was made by Peterson and seconded by Allen to introduce Ordinance 05-9 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 16 (BUSINESS AND BUSINESS REGULATIONS) BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES) PROHIBITING THE ESTABLtSHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHtN THE CITY OF CONCORD," stating that it would stop the establishment of additional dispensaries. Following comments by the Council, Councilmember Allen offered a friendly amendment to the motion, with a second by Bonilla, to allow the two dispensaries currently operating in the City to continue operations until a review could be conducted, to prohibit the opening of any additional medical marijuana dispensary businesses In the community, and to bring the introduced Ordinanee back to the Council for adoption under the normal course of business. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. . COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS The Mayor and Councilmembers shared their participation in various community events. CORRESPONDENCE a. August 31, 2005 memorandum from City Manager Lydia Du Borg entitled "Marijuana Dispensaries, Supplemental Information." b. Information dated September 1, 2005 from Joseph V. A. "Joe" Parlansky enlilled "Public Hearing, Sept. 6'" to Prohibit All Medical Marijuana Dispensaries." c. Letter from Gary l. Wheeler, Architect from Arete, fne. regarding Ordinance amending Chapter 16 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries. d. Memorandum date September 6, 2005 from David Livingston, Chief of Police, entitled "Removal of Item 2.m - POA Lease Agreement - 9/6/05 Council . Agenda." e. Letter dated September 6, 2005 from Cary McReynolds of Andersen & Bonnilield Law Firm concerning Item 4.b on the evening's agenda. f. Letter dated September 6, 2005 from Cary McReynolds of Andersen & Bonnilield law Flrm concerning Item 4.c on the evening's agenda. WebMD Health Material on Marinol submilted by David Bicktord. g. 8 I I I I I I City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes h. September 6, 2005 Copy of Superior Court Civil Action pleading "Americans For Safe Access and William McPike, Plaintiffs v. City of Fresno, a municipal corporation, Defendant" submitted by Joseph Partansky. i. Copy of United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pleading "Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment, Inc; California Detoxification Programs, Inc.; Aon Kletter, Ph.D.; Vicki Roe; Susan Coe; Rhonda Loe; Ray Doe; Oscar Voe; Cindy Moe; Robin Poe; Mary Foe;. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v City of Antioch, Defendant-Appellee" submitted by Joseph Partansky. j. Voice Mail Correspondence from Margery Kane favoring the ban on cannabis clubs. By order of the chair, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 p.m. ~ ~~ MARK TEASON COUNCtLMEMBERlAGENCY CHAIR 9 ANNOTATED AGENDA REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE CONCORD CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Tuesday, September 6, 2005 6:30 p.m. - Council Chamber 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord, CA 5:30 p.m. - City Council Conference Room I. ROLL CALL II. CLOSED SESSION a. Conference with Legal Counsel to discuss significanf exposure to potential litigation against the City pursuant to Government Code Seetion 54956.9(b). Two pending claims filed by EQR Legacy Partners 2000 Concord LCC against Concord Redevelopment Agency and City of Concord. ACTION: Closed Session held. 6:30p.m. - Council Chamber ROLL CALL - All Present . PLEDGE TO THE FLAG - Councilmember Shinn PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Joseph V. A. Partansky encouraged residents to attend the Civic Engagement series at the Pleasant Hill Library featuring "California Rising - Life and Times ofPat Brown" whieh begins at 7:00 p.m. on September 7,2005. City CouncillRedevelopment Ageney Agenda September 6, 2005 1. ANNOUNCEMENTS Announcement - of nine openings on the Commission on Aging, nine openings on the Community Serviees Commission, seven openings on the Human Relations Commission, and three openings on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission each with staggered terms,and setting Friday, November 4, 2005 as the deadline for receipt of applications by the Administrative Services Coordinator. Report from Mayor Hoffmeister. ACTION: Mayor Hoffmeister announced nine openings on the Commission on Aging, nine openings on the. Conununity Services COmmiSSiOll, seven openings on the Human Relations Commission, and three openings on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space . Commission each with staggered terms, and Set Friday, November 4, 2005 as the deadline for receipt of applications by the Administrative Services Coordinator. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS 2. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR a. Approval of Minutes - ofJuly 19,2005. Recommended by City Clerk. ACTION: Minutes approved. b. Approving - an agreement with Nortek in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to serve as projeet manager and to implement a Computer Aided Dispateh (CAD) System; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. . Recommended by Chief of Police. . ACTION: Agreement approved; City Manager authorized to execute it. e. Approving - an agreement with Motorola to penorm maintenance of hardware for the mobile data computers at a cost of$117,357.72; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Recommended by Chief of Police. ACTION: Agreement approved; City Manager authorized to execute it. 2 City Couneil/Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 6, 2005 d. Matter to be set for Public Hearing on September 27, 2005 - Concord Boulevard Rezoning - consideration of an applieation to rezone three parcels, 3554, 3556, and 3600 Concord Boulevard, from Single Family Residential to Apartment and Professional Office District. Assessor Parcel Nos. 113-111-051, 113-111-063, and 114-370-060. Recommended by the Planning Commission. ACTION: Public Hearing set for September 27,2005. e. Approving - authorization for permit parking on Balhan Drive between Lightwood Drive and Park Highlands Boulevard. Resolution 05-60 for. adoption. Reeommended by the Direetor of Public Works - Maintenance Serviees. ACTION: Resolution 05-60 adopted. f. Approving - Final Map for Renaissance Square Condominiums (Tract 8870), Assessor's Parcel No, 126-062-0 I 0, approving a Subdivision Agreement for up to 314 condominium units in three buildings at 185] Galindo Street; and authorizing the City Manager to exeeute the Subdivision Agreen1ent. Resolution 05-58 for adoption: Reeommended by Director of Public Works - Engineering Services. ACTION: Resolution OS-58 adopted, approving the map and agreement. g. Approving - Final Map for Granada Glen SubdiVision (Tract 8819), Assessor's Pareel No.1 14-154-018, approving the Subdivision Agreement for 7 single- family residential lots at 3989 Concord Boulevard; and authorizing the City Manager to exeeute the Subdivision Agreement. Resolution 05-59 for adoption. Recommended by Director of Public Works - Engineering Serviees. . ACTION: Resolution OS-59 adopted, approving the map and agreement. h. Awarding ~ a construetion contract in the amount of $ I 60,505 for Project No. 1284.02, Removal of Barriers to the Mobility Impaired (FY 2005-06); Projeet No. 1285.02, Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk Repair Program (FY 2005-06); and Project No. 2002, Bus Benehes; to SpenCon Construction, Ine. of Foster City. Bids were opened on July 11,2005. Recommended by DireetorofPublie Works- Engineering Serviees. ACTION: Award of Contraet approved. 3 City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Agenda September 6, 2005 i. Awarding - a construction eontract in the amount of $80,500 for Project No. 2017, Installation of Heaters at the Concord Community Pool, to Pool Seene, Inc. of Sacramento as the lowest responsible bidder; and approving a related budget transfer of $4] ,000. Bids were opened on July 19, 2005. Recommended by Director of Public Works - Engineering Serviees. ACTION: Award of Contract approved; Budget Transfer authorized. j. Accepting - improvements for Project No. 1869, Iron Horse Trail Gap Closure (Bancroft/Hookston),constructed by Grade Teeh of San Ramon; and directing the City Clerk to file the Notiee of Completion. Recommended by Director of Publie Works - Engineering Services. ACTION: Improvements accepted; Notice of Completion to be f11ed. k. Adoption of Rezoning Ordinance 05-425.4 - Villa De La Vista - to amend the zoning designation on a 0.85 acre site loeated at 149] La Vista Avenue from Medium Density Residential (M-1.8) to Planned District (PD) to provide for the proposed construction of ] 2 single-family homes: Rezoning Ordinance introdueed on August 2, 2005. . ACTION: Ordinance 05-425.4 adopted. I. Approving - an amended Capital Purchase Agreement with First 5 Contra Costa . Children and Families Commission for funding of the First 5 Center modular building; and authorizing the City Manager to exeeute the agreement. Recommended by Director of Community and Reereation Serviees. . ACTION: Amendment to. Agreement approved; City Manager authorized to execukit. m. Approving - a lease agreement with the Concord Police Officers Association for use of their firearms range and meeting hall facilities for FlY 05/06 at a cost of $24,999.96; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Recommended by Chief of Police, ACTION: This item was removed from the calendar at the request of the Concord Police Officers Association. 4 City Couneil/Redevelopment Ageney Agenda September 6, 2005 3. CONSIDERATION a. Consideration - of an offer of a reward of up to $5,000 for information leading to the arrest and conviction of the person(s) responsible for the attempted murder of Jose Rosales. Resolution 05-61 for adoption Report from Chief of Police. ACTION; Resolution 05-61 adopted authorizing the offer of a reward. b. Consideration - of a request to the Department of Defense, through the Office of Economic Adjustment, to recognize the Concord City Council as the Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA) for the Concord'Naval Weapons Station. Resolution 05-68 for adoption. Report from City Manager. ACTION: . Resolution 05-68 adopted requesting the Department of Defense, through the Office of Economic Adjustment, to recognize the Concord City Council as the Local Redevelopment Authority for the Concord Naval Weapons Station. . 4. CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Proposed Amendment to Concord Municipal Code - Adoption of 2004 California Electrical Code, Title 24 - amending Chapter] 4, Article VII, Section 14-18 I and deleting sections ] 4-] 83 and 14-184 of the Concord Municipal Code. Ordinanee 05-8 for introduction. Report from Chief Building Official Vance Phillips. ACTION: Ordinance 05-8 introduced by reading of the title only and waiving further reading. b. Proposed Ainendment to the Master Fees and Charges Resolution - Park Land Dedication Fees - approving increases in Park Land In-lieu fees, phasing the overall increase over a five-year period. RecOmmended by the Council Committee on Policy Development and Internal Operations, Item continued from the meeting of July 5, 2005. Data is available for public review at Publie WorkslEngineering Services. Resolution 05-6042.4 for adoption. Report froin Public WorkslEngineering Services Director Alex Pascual. ACTION: Resolution 05-6042.4adopted. 5 City Couneil/Redevelopment Ageney Agenda September 6, 2005 e. Proposed Amendment to Concord Municipal Code - Prohibition of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries - amending Chapter 18 (Business and Business Regulations) by adding Article XI (Medical Marijuana Dispensaries) prohibiting the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Concord. Ordinance 05-9 for introduction, Report from Assistant City Attorney Mark Boehme. ACTION: Ordinance 05-9 Introduced by reading of title only and waiving' further reading. JOINT CITY COUNCILI REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS 5. JOINT CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR a. Awarding - a building demolition contract in the amount of $ 166, I 70 to Delta . Oilfield Services, Inc. of Woodland as the lowest responsible bidder for Project No. . 20 I 8, Demolition of Redevelopment Properties, Ceramie. Studio, and Park Restrooms, and approving a related budget transfer in the amount of$2 I 1,500. Bids were opened on July 28, 2005. Recommended by Director of Publie Works _ Engineering Services. . ACTION: Contract awarded; Budget Transfer approved. (3-0-2; Allen, Peterson Absent) b. Matters to be.set for Public Hearing on September 27,2005 I) Amendment of November 2000 Disposition and Development Agreement between the Concord Redevelopment Agency and Legacy Partners 2273 LLC - to add a provision eliminating the tax increment rebate if the projeet eonverted to condominiums, .llIid to remove provisions that provide for defetTed partieipation payments to the Agency. . Recommended by Director of Planning and Economic Development. ACTION: Public Hearing set for September 27,2005. (3-0-2; ADen, Peterson Absent) 6 City CouncilJRedevelopment Ageney Agenda September 6, 2005 2) Emergency Mobilehome Rental Assistance Program for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodges - Transfer of funds from Capital Improvement Project No. P] 168, Affordable Housing Infrastructure, to Emergency Mobilehome Rental Assistance for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodges, a new projeet, and amend the Redevelopment Agency Housing Set-Aside 2005-06 Budget and IO-Y ear Plan, Recommended by Director of Building and Neighborhood Serviees. ACTION: Public Hearing set for September 27, 2005. (3-0-2; Allen, Peterson Absent) 6. CORRESPONDENCE a. August 3 I, 2005 memorandum from City Manager Lydia Du Borg entitled. "Marijuana Dispensaries, Supplemental Information." b. Information dated September I, 2005 from Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky entitled "Public Hearing; Sept. 6th to Prohibit All Medical Marijuana Dispensaries." c. Letter from Gary L. Wheeler, Architect from Arete, Ine, regarding Ordinance amending Chapter 18 Medieal Marijuana Dispensaries. d. Memorandum date September 6, 2005 from David Livingston, Chief of Police, entitled "Removal of Item 2.m - POA Lease Agreement - 9/6/05 Couneil Agenda." e. Letter dated September 6, 2005 from Cary MeReynolds of Andersen & Bonnifield Law Firm coneerning Item 4.b on the evening's agenda. f. Letter dated September 6, 2005 from Cary McReynolds of Andersen & Bonnifield Law Firm concerning Item 4.e on the evening's agenda. g. . WebMD Health Material on Marinol submitted by David Bickford. h. Copy of Superior Court Civil Action pleading "Americans For Safe Access and William McPike, Plaintiffs v. City of Fresno, a municipal corporation, Defendant" submitted by Joseph Partansky. . i. Copy of United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pleading "Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment, Ine; California Detoxification Programs, Ine.; Ron K1etter, Ph.D.; Vicki Roe; Susan Coe; Rhonda Lae; Ray Doe; Osear Voe; Cindy Mol'; Robin Poe; Mary Foe;. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v City of Antioeh, Defendant-Appellee" submitted by Joseph Partansky. 7 City Council/Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 6, 2005 7. . CLOSED SESSION REPORTS - None .8. COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS a. Mayor Hoffineister and Councilmember Shinn reported on their recent participations' in community events. . 9. ADJOURNMENT - at 10:20 p.m. NOTICE There is a 90-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Superior Court to certain City administrative decisions and . orders which require a hearing hy law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on . the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6): Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but not limited to Government Code Section 65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else rsised in the public hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting (policy and Procedure No.2, Section 4.24), For information on the next regular or special City Council meeting, please call (925) 671-3495. NEXT REGULAR CITY C.oUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, Septemher 13, 200S MEETING RECORDS Audio cassette tapes and videotapes of most City Council meetings are available for listening or viewing at the City Clerk's office. Copies of the videotapes may be purchased. Contact the Community Relations Manager at (925) 671-3272 for further information. 8 . .,c;;>- ~ -- ... Pot Club (;Ioscs Following Robbery ~ Cannabis News Inrormlng the public about cannabis WI'NJ.cannabisne"y.s.com Posted by CN Staff on J'une ] 4,2002 at ] 6:06:30 PT By David Scharrenberg, Daily Planet Starr Source: Berkeley Daily Planet I C811ffy that fhl. ~ment"'jl,tsJI'"I' .' Y/l~ . ~~ SEAl. () . cre'" CIIy of Concord, California The University A venue medicinal marijuana club that was robbed last week for the third time in a year closed its doors pennanently Tuesday. "We + wanted to make sure that we weren't putting patients at risk, and we wanted to keep neighbors safe," said Berkeley Medieal Herbs office manager Dorrit Geshuri. . The elub, which. has attracted a spate of negative publicity with the robberies, was closed also because the club wanted to protect the medicinal marijuana movement and the other four pot clubs in town, Geshurj said. The financial losses incurred in the robberies did not playa role in the closure, she said. . "I think it's a responsible decision," said City Councilmember Linda Maio, who had vowed to shut down Medical Herbs after last week's robbery. The heist took place Wednesday afternoon when two Latino men said they knew owner Ken Estes then forced their way into the club, brandishing a gun and a knife. The robbers told everyone to lie on the ground and made off with about $1,500 in cash and over a pound of marijuana, valued at $3,500. After a December robbery, neighbors and city officials raised concerns about security on site and the safety of residents. The club responded by shortening its hours of operation, hiring a licensed security guard and installing cameras, among other measures. The club was considering additional measures, Geshuri said, when the June 5 robbery occurred. The Medical Herbs ownership announced the closure in a weekly meeting of the Alliance of Berkeley Patients, an umbrella group for the dispensaries in town. Don Duncan, who operates Berkeley Patients Group,.another marijuana club, welcomed the decision. . "I think in this instance, it's for the best," he said, noting that he would normally be upset with the move because there is "safety in numbers" for a movement under constant political pressure. Duncan said he is pleased that the Medical Herbs management is eommilled to putting patients in touch with other clubs. http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/threadI3131 .shtml 9/22/2005 . "c;"" ~ Vl.) "The patients will be taken care' of," he said. "That's great." "I am so grateful that the management of that group has decided to shut its doors," said City Councilmember Dona Spring. "Public safety comes first." Spring argued that the decision will serve the medicinal marijuana movement in Berkeley. By pre-empting new robberies, she said, the closure will help prevent neighbors of other. clubs from becoming overly eoncerned. "My reaction is one of relief," added Mayor Shirley Dean. "I think it was a good decision on their part, a responsible decision." Several neighbors made efforts to close down the club in the wake of the robberies. But Geshuri said most have been supportive. Stan Eby, who manages a number of apartments on University Avenue, said a drug store and. meat market that used to be in the neighborhood were robbed far more often than the pot . elub. He said he was sad to see Medieal Herbs go. "It's a shame that it's closing up," he said. "We need clubs like thal." Geshuri said the management of Medical Herbs may re-open as a '~uice bar and herbal medicine establishment." The new store would not sell marijuana, she said. . Note: Club aims to protectpublic, patients and marijuana as medicine. Source: Berkeley Daily Planet (US CA) Author: David Scharfenberg, Daily Planet Staff Published: June 12,2002 Copyright: 2002 The Berkeley Daily Planet Contact: QJ2IDiont(i)berkeleydailvplanel.riet Website: http://,,';ww.hcrkelcydailyplancl.com/ Related Artieles: Pot Club Robbed for ThirdTime in a Year b.uv.:/ /canna bisnews.com/ncws/thread 1 3072 .sh 1m I Armed Robbers Take Over Medical Marijuana Club hJ.tp://cannabisnews.com/ncws/thread 13 066.shtml HOllie Comment Email Register Recent COl!!ments Heln Post Comment Name: Password: E-Mail: . http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/lhreadI3131.shlml 9/22/2005 oJ .... ._~ rage J 01 j Subject: Comment: (Pleasc rcfrain Irom using profanity in your message] II I I Link URL: http:// Link Title: ( Post Message ) I Reset I Retum to Main Menu So 'v'O)'on, ""y '''';y 'III, 'mice ",' 10 keep it ",nnlng. II", '" ,om' GUid,h..,,: NO 'I"",,,,ing. NO "mmerci,' ,,',ml,lI,g. NO n,mming. NO ill,ll'I' ",'vl!y. and NO ~t'xllalJr l'xplicil nlillcri..J~. La:.!I)', W\l r..:ser\,,,: lh(! ri~hl ttJ rt'nll'J\'~ IIn\' mt'~~11!1! lin :IIlV reas(lnl This 'ft'eb plgr and rebted elemenu art tor ilJtonnali~'e purposes only and thus fht' USt' otan)'Orlbis lnrormalion is 81 your ..uk! Wt"do nor 0"11 nor are rt'spons;blt" rorl'i5l1or c:omments.1n accorduce ,,'itb Tille 17 V.S.C. Seclion 107 IlId Tht" Berne Convenlion on Uterary and Artistic Works. Arcide 10. CIC~"" clippings on Ibis site: art mil de IVlllable wilbout profit rOt nsutch and tduntkmal purposes. An)' trademarks, trade names, nn'ict' marlui, or senice Dames vsrd on thlssilt art Iht' proprrt)' orlbt'Jr tetpedlnowneJ"$. Page updatf'd on Junt' 14,20021116:06:30 http://www.cannabisnews.com/news/threadI3131.shtml 9/22/2005 , ':-. :~:': .:.;:':. '. . ...... .. :.' ...:.---:. .':,-..,-.', .. ,....:.;,...;. J .. ....~. . .; ~~~~-:-~~;\~r:+?;if;F<'::;: ,. -.. .: :~,. '~.... '''''.'. ~ . , ,..;- '(.~.J.~ . .'. . .' .~ . ., \ .(. "~.'.. ".. .' '.;"1::. )~{~;\!: <:r.;-" '.; '.. '. ~ . : ....,.;;.;.- ....- fRED'S fRIENDS GHETTO TO GO ..wWw.eastbayexpress.com How one milll m.,lccs mOlley _ ruld fJills - Jt J.I"el1 colleges. FAGE :!I ISRAELI GEARS High-end t"l(eollt food is the post-9/11 dininQ In:~mj Tlle Jewish Fanl Festi....al declJrcs its OWl! truce. PAGE .n PAG E. .1 ATTAO-rr-lENl' 1 (, . '., " . ..:; '..\~':; .~.~ '~::'" ..........;; .. .. ;.:~:: . 7:'. .,....-. . ..~ '."..', . ,~"... . .. -~------. ..~---- . " u~tbaY~.prns.tom ~..__._.__.__._-..... -..--.--...--.. . - _.~. en . . 1"'.': .1.' '.. ., ~EIGHBORJfOOD lo~ has J it thou be.(ort Ken Estes sel . up 'his m"ical-marijuana club, the property used to ;\.1 - be ,. whorehouse. The .,,~ neighbors wish it ,till was. . . Back then, the cUltome,. " waJl;ed in, took care of businel:J., and got out. Bad shit never went down al centralllerkele,,'s local brothel ~ cert.inly nothing like whu happened on the afternoon or June S. At 2:37 p;m.,roughJy,ninety muutln befOR closing time, I gray fiond. puUed to the curb and I.\VO Latino men got out the ear and. stepped up to the guard. One lopped out It250 . pounds and wore a plaid button.downshift; the' Other wu . skinn", kid in a T-shirt. The guard willc;ed back to the door, and ,houted (or !;He!'''rothtrth:ltthtl'f\l;',,~tWflgtlY''fttthe . door to see Ken. His brother cra~ktd open the doof, took a look, and lun~d back to yell for Esles.Atthat potat, the guard,noticed the two mf:n ncepingllp to lilt: door. ~No no. ygou can't come in hen!. he rll!ponrdly shollud. Then hll! .':I\\'lhegufL Mr. PI.id jammed a black plst~1 into the guard's back, lIond the T.shlrt: pulled out 1 kitchen knife with a (our-Inch bbde. According 10 the police report. they forced the b"Uard throuih the door, rushed Into the club, and SCrt':Ulh:d at everyone to Ik face down on the OOOt. Everyone did "xc-ept for one mau, a wheelchair.bound Piltient who had coDle to get his legally prescn'bed dose of Rer~ a.ad hOW had. gun in his face. The two ~n trashed the pIKe and finally found the stash alter prying open & locked file c.binet. As terrified neigh- bors called the cops. the thieva ran out ohhe qub,jumped in thecar. and lJcKm.d It. It was the third antIed robbery 1116n Uni- venit)' Annue in ten tmmths. YOIt get into .Iotof creepy sruff !t"henyou hang out with KeD Estes. You get burglaries. armed robberies, polic~ nids, Ind felony charges. You also get ..negations of coca.llle dnJjng. tax fraud, and spousaJ abuse. The thing Is, Ken'! a really nice guy. With. tanned (Jce defined by 1 W1dy goatee, long blond hair, and a disuminrair of Wldor and vulnerabiliry, he' seems the very picture or Cal- ifornia euv livinl!'. It's onh' when 'au norice thll! wheeldtair supporting his shriveled legs. or the limp hand- shake born o( two decades at" nerve. damage, tbat you c3tl;haglimp~oCthe tragedy thu has been his companion since '1976. ShonJy Iher a motorcye!t- accident leh E$tes paral~ed below his chest. he btcarue 1 devoted lldvocaie of medklllll:nlj~lIona. He t'ar~nl"Y orS;lnized his c1cbto offer~\'e'1' 1'<"'- siblecomfon to the aid or dying. Berkel~y Medicll Herbs. which didn't ~;(Icdy h"lIffic in Sr.-John's-won. oprraf~d out of a cUle Iinle cottage that neighbors call the ~"hobbit WUTtIl. .. II. modest woodenlence frona Ihe street Ind a path leads through a mulch " ~.~Yi~SnldiSl 'I1rio~W$o'rn' o o lJwn to a whhe S<<Wity door. Beneath the rich, sloping redwood <<ilin& a spacious brick fire. place kee:ps patients ioany.-warm in the winter. OnCe I week. woman comes in Uld providu (re~ massages 00 , table in the comer. And ~ other East Bay pot clubs., moU of which IIren 1 clinical pharmacy's ItmoJphen, padellfl can sit down and light up right theft. beneath rustic paintings of JimJ, Janis, and J~ny. Uit \Wren'&: (or the aime that has plagued his club's operation, ESla might be the paO'OQ saint o( Be'rkel~y stoners. "We have tbr lien prices and the bestmedicint."'heboasts. -((you know buds,. we lmoe the bomb. .. But ever since Estes tint got In,olved ia the mcdical.mlU"ijuan. movement, men with drup, guns. and evil intent have (ollo~d hiin everywhere he goes. They have robbed him, exploited his generosity, a.nd endan~rtd the U\'esof evervone around him"':' evt'n his thret children. But "Compusionate Ken,. IS his (riellds call him, doesn't seem 10 I".rn. Ht .always pides tht:' wrong friends. At leut that's Ken's side of the- story. His estranged lover. Stacey Trainor, loJd a darker version 10 the Contra Costa district attorney's office. She alleged tIt:1I Estu is a former coke , dealer who lied to seCUle bls c:Illb'..leasto, that he ha.s Illerkeley doctor in his pockct:whqwiU . St'1I pol prescriptions (or: S21S 1 pop, and that up to fhirty perceJ1,f of his Cllslnmers huy hb ptoduct withOut any medical notes If all. Police and University Ave-nut Dle-nh,ots, meanwhile. d3im dut high.schoollclds ~ed 10 line up (or a taste olllside Estu' club, and m:lt hissecuriry guuds sc-a.red away neighbor. hood_ shoppen and even MIIU,*" _jIap 14 U$tb.vu!,r!n.c,~~c.JU~Y_Z~.J.O.2002 U~! .A,'I'<P"~\[H, U GOLDEN BEAR ART &' GIFT NOW OPEN! 'Unique nature painlings by 9 mists . :Flgu~llvtand lriha!a"- : Over 300 animal KUlpluru Sb-~oll!'lGS ~roNTIl O}' JULY! ~"<TI"1 olCBJOLAGEo .. ...~t''''IU'h''4'' $209.lL Downlown Berkeley 1944 University Ave 510.540.1160 Tu c. F rl II:) 0 ~ 5: J 0 Sat 12. S ~ ~ 14 tAST lAY EX.RIESS JUlV 24.30, 2002 ustb~yuprUI.I.Qm Estes advertised: Fi... Pot Club ~ntlllll"'frvmp.(.U got involved in fighu on the Street. His fel. low t:annllbis.dub operators C\'en tried to drive Estes out of town. Whether Estes is a character out O(The French Connection or one o'ut of The Gang Thor Couldn't Shoot Straight, he couldn't . nisI without the pecuJiu politics or Proposition 215. which decriniinalited medical marijuana in California. In the six )'CUS since ils passage, ma>.ors. di$lricl l!tomevs, and state offidals have been 50 focused on protecting patients (rom fed- eral prosecution thlt they've neglected to implement any son o( regulations about how pol should be distributed. No statt or local JPncy or.mainmcam medical group has offered any comprehensive guidelines OR who should hand out pot in what man. nero As a result, mediul pot is not just legal, bur luperlep/, perhaps California's least-ngulated Ingestible substance, And yet marijuana remains I powerful intoxi- cant with I vast uf'lderground market, one who~ dealers inhabit a shadowy criminal world populated bydangcTOUs men. In the absence of official telUlalion, it has (alien to pot.dub operators thrm~ selves to craft some son of S)'Uem. OYer the lut six years. groups like the Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperalive and Ihe Alliuce of Berkeley Patients have, Ihrough a series of trials and sometimes emburwing errors. arriYed ar a prolO('ol for verifying medical ailments, pro\iding security (rom criminals, .nd operaring safel)'ln quiet residenrlal and commel'tiaJ neighborhoods, But however sensible their rules milY be. they have no means of (orcing club operators to abide by them, All the)" have is.. gentlemen', agreement. Ken Estes broke that agr~ement, whether by design or neglect. And no one may have the legal power to make him stop. ~ STES Is that rare breed of B.y ~; AteaNltivewhos~nth.:ist<<nagr 'd ~ )'ears here in the '70s and didn't -it ":t smoke pO;t. Bom in Martinez. he c;~movrd to Concord and became a Star athlete If Ygnaeio Valley High, He excelled atsocc:er andwuoffered II scholar- ship to Sanla Clara Univet$ity, but that.1I c:han~d one day in 1976,,, month after he gndullled from high Khool Estes was rid. Ing his mOlorcrc1e back (rom a Walnut Creek McDonald's, where he worked as I m:1n3I:e'r. when a elf swer\"(.d into his bne W\1 hit him heiuJ on. Esees tlew over the C:ll" and broke his neck, The damage was so extensive that for lhenext two rUrs, he couldn't even move his aims. He struggled through physical therapy hoping to rtpin jUst enough mobility 10 kill hJnuel( Esles was wracked with chronic p:Jln,liv_ ingin I rehab c:enter a.nd dependent Dn oth- .... to bathe and clothe hlm. The morphinl! and ehe pills didn't help, and he began to Wa,<jle Dw:lr, "I probllblr,trot dOWTll0 II hun_ dred pounds, md I'm six feet," he u.ys. "I couldn't eat. 1 couldn't sleep. the physic:d pain was horrible, I nightmare. But aboUlsix or eighe moow into it, a group of Viem:un Vets 1 was in rehab wim wert smoking mar- Ijunu. They uid, 'Look, man. we know you'te not rao'l' or sleeping. why don~ rou com~ over here \\ith us" I said no, 'c:!.u$e 1 ..- was still thinking abouf ke~ping mr bod} clean. Bur they ~d, 'Nan., they're poppinE pilb in you and morphine. This is 1 lot leS5 . th:uJ that.' Sa I uid, 'Alright, lemme smol-e: Th;1l nJght,J slept all night. When I woke up. I afe. Thq' brought che dOC'tOrs in. the)' said, 'Looldt, he's eating!' M~' dOCtor wrote it on the chart, he wrote that this marijuana is doing what yt)U WVlt the pills to do." Aherthatlim(Qke, Estes put his Iile ba.ck together. He rerained limited use of his mns, enrolled in junior coUege, and by lhe early 'SOs was offered another scholarship. thiJ time 10 UC Smu CI'\IZ, Estes decided instead to open Utringoi'ta.nn.ing. hair, and naihalons inConcgrdand Davis. He met his future girlfriend Stacey Tf'llinor while she was working at I mini mart next to one ofhiJ SalOM. "J kept c:omingover there, and she would alwlYS ~ the banana drink rea.dy (or me, gel the burrito ready,. he SlYS, Within a month o( their lint date, Trainor left her husband and moved in with Estes:, Together they would raise' three children. But something always botht'red Estes. 8efore he began growing his own. he t}'Pi- cally took his business [0 Haight Slnet or Telegraph Avenue.lt was. dangerous pas- rilDeljuatbecawehe wanted to rdieye his dlscomfart, he wu mURed.thiee times and occ:asiona:Jly suffered the indignity of heingdumped Olltofhis chair. In the '1I0s, as AIDS swept through the country, Estes began clipping press l!ccounts of "Brownie Mary," the elderly wornan who used to walk the halls ofSu Franci,coGeneral Hospital, handing out marijuana.laced . treats 10thetenn.InaJly ilt Slowly, he began to think that this wasu't just 1 drug, but a cause. In 1992, he signed over his share o( the ulon' to his business partner and statted distributing pot, going to demon. stndons, and working to decriminalize medicaJcl1Ulabis. ~Evtryone thought I was crazy, but I said I wanted to pursue this,'" he recalls, "I'm tired of being looked It 15 a doper,.iIS a pothud, as somebody less titan somebody else btc:ause I used marijuana." Yet as Estes became a fixture in the med. i~alcD.l\nablsscene.hislifet,e.c:!.tneincre:lS. ingly chaotic and dangerous, At the very time thu P'Opolilion 2J5libef3ted thou. sands of medicaJ.muijuanl smoker$ from prosecution, Estes bepa a long. almost (:11- dcal slide into crime. Even $Coring on Strefl corners didn't compare tt';l what was to come. "No guns intherace II thatpoinf,~ he sayso(hise.arlyyears. "Thatcamelarer.with the medical.mariju:ull movement." ---""'"""I) STES began Ius cannabl$ aClh-ism L: .. by volunteering at the Oakland i~ Cannabis Buyers Cooperative. -'1 . a From the beginning, The co-op ~hlSbeenatthecuttinged~o(the movemcn~ Whert Slit Francisco dubs have a looser. anarc:hic$pirit. it's l\1l business at the Oakland Co-op. whose memben have pion~ere-d l;e~Qrll)" and m~dic"" prolocols with I determinC'd air of professionali,m. Jeff,Jones, fhe co-op's exeCll1j,.e Jirec:tor. doesn', even Imoke POt. Growing up in South D:akou., Jones watched his father waste aWlv and die from a terril>le illness IInd. vowed to find ~ way fO bring medical marljulU\a [0 the lerminall}' ill. Jones firSI JQinlld the co.op in 1995 ;ll1d soon (ound himself making home deliv~riel of dope 10 AIDS Ind canctrpllcient$, If Estel i$" cre.ui\'e bu.t befuddled libertine. Jones is rigid and dogmaoc. From the srarr, the two rubbfd ant' another the wrongwa)'. After passage of Proposition 215, the co- op emerged from th!' shadows and began distributing pol out in the open. But no one had any idea how togo about ie. There were simply no rules; one day medical pot was illegal. the ne",t day it wasn't. . Proposition 21S is one in a long series of brief, poorly conceived initiatives whou implementation has prOfen to be I giant headache. The ''Compassionate Use Act of 1996" offers no guidance on how pOI should be disrributed; indetd, the initiative is a sin- gle page in length and metely encourages the ft1feraJ and sClte guvenunents to "imple.- ment a plan to provide fOr the ufe and affordable disaiburion o( marijuana to aU patients." Six years lartr, no one in Sa~- mento has figured out what this means. No state agency haHver issued binding direcrives on how to distribu~ pot, or to whom, Untit the California legislature panes a law to govern distribution. nei- ther the anorne)' fenenl, nor the stlte health department hIS Iht JepJ au.thority to innovate any such protocols. "Pl1lposi- tion21S did not add<<ssprcscriptioM," rears bter, we'd sriU be openring in a vac- uum!' Others WOI1')' that jf the sbte t3kes II firmer hand,ll conservative governor or attorney general might intctpret the la""'.50 narrowly as 10 effectively recriminalizt medicalc&nIlabis. But "eryone Ig:rees that since the gov. ernment hasn't set up rules, dub opentot$ must pollee themselves. The Oakbnd Cannabu Buyt'rs Collective wu at the fore- front of this effon, keeping and verifying padem reeords, hiring security guards, and eS(!ilblishing a rigorous duaJ-idenrificadon system, in which palients had to pass through multiplr checkpoints. "To be a member, they had to nun in a nott from a licensed physician Ihlt we could verify," Jones s.ays. "EVen cancer and AIDS patients had to renew the noteeveryyear. Th~were II little mad abounhis, but we had to conlinn that their medical liU:t\!S hadn't changed, and the\' stiU nef"ded our services-" On~ Oakland officialswere ISsun:d that, un1ike at San Francisco dubs, patients. "''Quid never smoke dope at the site, rela. tions between the co-op and the citY hive g!n1inllybet'ncordiaJ. The city cOWlcilcon- tracted with the co-op to distribute por to sevt'ft thouund patients on its behalf, and 'Yis it, firs t graIl free'. sa)'s Hallre Jord:lO. spokrswoman (or Attorney GeneralBllI Locl)'er. "The initia- tive did nOI authorizt or spell out any ,pe. eifie scheme (or dispensing marijuana. Nor did i~ say who is tntitled to it. or how much marijuana is required (or which ail- me.\t. J think f"\'eryone recognh:ts that Proposition 2JS wu not Ute besl-written initiatiVe!. But tbe voters pused it." With the state panl}ozid, it hu (:illen to local governmentS to regulue medinJ mar. ijuana, But most localities have adopted . strictly laissez-faire approach and done vir- tuallynothingto ensure thatlhe distribution of po, adheres to the spiril ot Proposition 2J5. The: portion o( the Berkeley munic:ipaJ code govemingmedical pot, for example, is so ridiculously lax fhat it pu)'$ right Into the cit)-'swomsfcreotypes, and ret it'su strict as virtulllly ..ny other BlIY Arta city. Although th~ code IimllSrheamOllRto(pota dub can have on h;md. mer! art no provi. sions Jimirio!:how close a pot dub can be to a school. or requlringdoaors to conduct an aCtuaf evaluation of patients. or requiring bacl.ground checks (or pal disrributors _ . which is standard pnctice fur anyone who wants to run a liquor store. Yetthe codt does tncourage pot clubs to '1lSt their best eKoru to determine whether Dr nOt cannabis is organically grown." city Countilmembetlllinda Maio and ;)",\;. ~t" ;,,0,: ....~ Ih" ..il~ ..,1.\ t \:\':'1 \,.,-il.. up a specific.use permit (or cannabis clubs, because doing $0 would ..;olare {edera.llaw. The end resuh b thai medical par is aCl\laJly Itss regubted than candy WI, which must at lellit h::t~ their ingredienrs printed on the wr.1Jlpe'r. Anyone can di5trihute medical pot anrwhtre, in :my (ashion they ple:ue, 1lJ1d ..;rtually no one is watchingthern. ,':"M LUn OPERATORS Jisal;ne on Wh~lh"T (ilis j!l~ulla or bod. Jdr . Jones ....ants the ~mmenl fO Jtep _ in and bringsomeconunon sense ro . ,~,..' rot'~ distributinn. '.Wt thou~tllthe \lo\'cmmenc .....ould ':I:'t invoked in diso-ihut- i,..~ mt-dical mou'ijuana as per the state law," ht U.Y5.'" never though that five or ten the co-op's membl!nhip cuds became Ihe definitive means of ident:i!ying medical pot patients throuihollt the Eut Bay. Jones tven lea cites classes on medical marijuana to recruiu It the Oakland police academy, "We've never givcn them a n'ason to ques. tion what we're doing here," he 53)'1, "The local police like us because!: we give them an alternative to going CUI on the strert. Our group have never done an}'thing that has beeadeemed illepl, and we~ never gonen complaints from anyone: - except the (ed. er:d go\'enunent." Berkeley's three clubs went through the same pnxen, experimtnting with various ffi:wlly and palienl:verifil;:ation protocols.. In the beginning of200J. che Berkeley Patients Group on San Pablo Avenue, the Cannabis Buyers Cooperative on Shattuck. and the Patients Cue Collective on Tele. gnph (ormed the Allianct af Berkeley Patienu and agreed upon a ten-painE pial_ (arm, This included organizing as a eoll~. rive or nonpro6t.conracting physicians to confirm a patient's mediul condition, saupulously keeping patienl records, hir. ing kcurity guards. and maintaining good relations with their ndghbon. "'We agreed fopolice ourselves, &0 wedon'l baveto haw :In)' outside regulators that might not have the patient" best interests In mind," says Btrlcele)' Patients Croup membtr Don D.mC:l..i. Thcr~ was just one problem: nont of these regulations had the (orce of l~w behind them. Even the police, ha.mStnlllg by a tit). council cogninnt of the over. whelming public support for medical pot, can do \.inually norhingto crack down on rogue clubs. If someone wanttd to hOlndnOU( poc like cUld)', no Ofle could stop him His neighbors afong university Avenue ~on filNred (his 01.1(. q. CCOUNTS DIFFER a$ to what .}., .E5tesdid when he first ~ho",'ed up '~...1 3t the O:lkland co-op's door In .1. ~ 1995. Some say he Illut:ht the co. .~ -:...op'1 pot culriv:ltion classes: others claim he wei@:he~ our contlnll," 0" pac:_ 16 . '" ",..1 .':1 ,., ~ I: .., ... - -.-- ----. --.--- -.-.. .~._- ~$37995 lull5iltlram~ & FREE luni lulon I 5hiltu&'Ave~'._:"""" CONCORD.SCft Ccmtrt. Costa Blvd: IIUIUN678:iDubliIlBlvd:- FIIItHONf.3911i r..~l( tit.' '. . p.u.o AlTO 2D9B EI Camino fl'il SAN FIUNasCO J~S Geary Blvd. U, OvnET 21SD Cnar Chavu SAN MAno 1311 5.EI Cimino Rnl SANU,,u1,91"lh5t. UHf" 1054 3'99 Indumial Dr r"lFOto~ --- "u"~a"'nylra"'.I"'I""OII S;12'1gr"'.rraft~f!'C'..." .,.n l,Jftal..IOttg,.. I ....nl...'g..'..ol..,.'I'I"lu.....ou.r~f.'" . <U.Hb_"n..,.n\5l.~~tlVI,'!J4\~OJ~~0+J.~ 1.f;~Jrs~-,o;.....(SS LS ".:.::!'::'~~~fl;'P~ ~')1:: ,. f' ... :: 'r:~,.l .(.\~ tlA:. Pot Club at 1h~ co-op kn~w Ih~ two had done this; conUnll'clltoIltP.te1S ceruinly Ihe p.:uienu had no idea thiu Iheir confidential information wu being the bawes and sampled the Warts 10 cate- bandied about like just another mailing IWrize their poren~~Estes says he did both. list. Estes concedes he made no effo" to But one thing seems de.v: he and Jeff Jones cali their doe;ors and confirm their med. didn't gef :oliong. ':.Ieff always thought Ken ic:-.I condition _ he just starttd making ~hould cui his hair-Ioo~ mort Ippropriate delivtries to 100'one with a card from the (or you guys. the medIa," says one co-op Oakland club. . member who asked not to be named. "Ken . wulike,'Youknow,Jdon'thayetolookright ~'; y THE TIM:E thai Estes Went into for Ihe press. I'm a patient.... Jones won't say r-. J busineliS {or himself, he, Trainor, much 'about what he thoughl of Esres, but ~,OUld their three children had moved Estes recalls, ':Jeffs;lld, 'Look. i1you cut your Fto . house in Concord. where he hair, you'll go places around here.' I said, ~ began growing pot to supply his 'C'mon. you're sounding lih the people on (rowing army of patienes. On Seprember 20. the streets I'~ been deaJingwith for years. Concord polke officer David SZY~ toOk a YOI.l're sounding like the COtUel'V1lDve white call: f.sles' neighbor dUmed that she could guy who doesn't like anyone lookin'differ. see a bumper crop of pot plmts growing in enl from himself.' So yeah, .....e had a lot of his backyard. S.avage nopp~ by and peeked Irouble, J lold him one time, 'I wannaget OUI over the fence. L3ter that afternoon,hc of my chair and btatyour I.!II,'" rtturn~ wicha search WarratlL Whether the Oakl.:ind co-op itself was Snage's police repo" indicaces that he entirely abow-board is a manerofsome d.s- found pot evel'}owhere. He found roughly pute, Accor.ding to Trainor's statement to fifty plants in a makeshift greenhouse in the the ContraCosu DA, the co-op paid f.stes in baclcyvd, He found an elaborate hydroponic pot.-nd unreported cash. "Part ohhe marl. rynem in the gang'e; behind meecs of dark juana'he ncei~ ~ payment from the club pludc, dOzens of planes were growing on hewouJdseUtoomerpeop1e.inc:ludingper- plastic trays and in children's swimming sons who had no medical prescription for lTllriJuana." her statement readt, Jones denies paying Estes in under-the. table cash. but refuses to comment on whether he paid ESles with dope. Esles claims he receiy<<f. paycheck. nor cash. But he acknowledges the pot-for-I.bor lITang'e. ment, -I gOt herb for working," he says. "They gave me herb, chac,was che trade.off. I work~ th~re till it d~5td. ::.nd chen I 'l'em outand opened my new shop." In October 1998. the feds mana~ co get an injunction prohibiting the Oakland co-op from dispensing marijuana, The co-op foughdt all the way to the Supreme Court, where it eventually lost, Jones ;and his lawyers are preplll'ing a new challenge, but except fora one-month pcoriod during which ~c Injunction wu lifrn, the (O-OP n..s not handed out a dime b~g since 199R, Seven rhO~JhJ p~tiClll.s lIccJt..J <.Uloulcr 5upplkl', and Estes jumped in ro fill the void. But he needed cusromers, so Tr:ainor !llVS Estes ("lIlled , friend who worked Ine-re. This emplo)'ee gave Estes the names, 3ddreues, and phone numbers of fiVe hundred p<1tienlS, and Enu Soon Jra"ed drumming up customer:!. No one 16 EAST SA\' [X"I[SS JULY U.30, - - -- .---.---------.--- Child Prorecth'e Ser'\'ices. In deference- to PropO$ition21S, the)' leh Estes with three plants and an ounce tor his O~Tl use, But Estes complains Savage took aU the kind buds, and kft him iuS! a b.g of leafy shit. . ,Fifteen months later, the cops would be bad:. 8y then, Estes had boug-hc some property near Cleu LU:e, and Trainor had moved up north with the kids, growing m01e dope in a shed behind the house, Meanwhile, Estes' cousin Tim Crew had moved into the house to help liim gTOW . crop thai dwarfed his prior stash. This periCld marks the beginning of one of Esees' mon foolish habits: keeping massive ~ountS o( drop and mone}'lying uound. "People lold me, 'Don'r put more than a cenaia amount in che bank, or you could get In trouble.... he nys. .We had a lot of money, and I kept it with Ine, I'd hide it in my closet, hide it in my suitcase. I just did. n't want to pur it in a bank." As more and more people gOt hip to Esces' stash, his cavalier attitude would provoke.. spate of armed robberies that left his University A\'enue neigh bon lerritit'd. The first robbery happened in Concord on January J, 2000. Neighbors called che cops and reponed that sevenl men had pooh; grow lights wh<<led b~ck and forth on . track h"anging from the ceiling. He found baggies o{ .....eed stuffed in desk draw. ers and scattered along the floor, and plants hanging in the closets. In che 'master bed- . room, underneath a crib where one of the children slept. Savage {ound two garbage bagswirhdritd marijuana in them. NNone or Ihe growing and dried marijuam. was in a H'c'.:re p!:to::e," 5~\'~S"e Wr{ltf' in hi~ rerfJrt. "Most of the marijuana wlSaccessible to the children in the resideoc.e, Estes told [me] he wu notconcemed with thech~dren having accns rothe marijuana be'cause 'The}' know it is for daddy,''' ESles denies le;lYing bags or dope ~1lI' his children's cribs. But Savage didn't know wh::tc to do with 1;,. IJ' ITH THE HEAT coming down in Estu. E.:stc-s had an Oakland co-op card Ii.:t. ConCQrd. Estnq~~d:c-Iey. Tal<. certifying him ;as a patient, as well as 'bf1 ingourabusinessUCCl\Sunduon. palientrecords Indkarin~l-,e was a le~ally -., Il'\gpennit to sdl "herbs and other \':alid c;1regh'cr. How much Jupe JiJ : Ilomllop:tthic rem(.'<.!ie5.M J:~:.:s ~et Proposition 21S allow him to h"YeI' "Th~y upshopal1672 Universil')' Avenue. From the got a judge on the phone, and I talked to "ery beginning, Berkeley Medical Herbs was che judre," [SIrs says. "r said. 'Please don't chn~ctC'rized by his permissive business mm ml; pulllhe5e plOln{s our. These are 5ryle. i\tic~e1"RodC)'" Gru~er showed up good strains with mt'dkal ~ne{jts.'~ In the :n Estes' door just months into his newope.r' end. .he cops confiscated rhe plants and ;1non and handed him a bago(Quality prod. the gI'Owing~rstem. and TIned him out to \let. Estes U}'S enmner rold him there was 2002 eutlulY'.lIren.eom burst out of Estes' house and rKed dOWTl the street, luving the door Ijar. When Concord officers lUTived at the Itene, they fouod that the front door had been foiced o~n. They also found no fewer than 1,780 marijuana plants in various stages of culti- vation, ~en aher the break-il'. This time, the cops wouldn't be satisfied with confis- cuing his stuh. The' DA charged Elites "...!~ (<;Ollr fek'!l:' O::'='~I.'ltS of p~s~s!i('ln ltnd cultivation o( marijuana for sale. and .....iII probably argue that the Yolume of pOt on hand proved that he wu an outright dealer, nor I medicinal caregiver, His triaJ is set to b~gin on August S. - ... .-.-.-.---- more where thac carne from.;lJ1d he wascCI uinl)' happy to buy it. GruMer.!H'pn hant in.golll at tile dub-and Estes thought every thing was working jUJt fine. The nwsag 13bJe wu Up' and running, pacienl$ wer streaming through the door, the smoke wa flowing fredy. But oYll:t time, a tense, nerv ous atmosphere in{ected the club. finall) Esttsda.ims,afriendt:ame to him and brok! the bad news; Grunner was dealing cranl 01.11 of the back 100m. F..stes says he prom pill threw Grunnerautofthe club. But the t1ub's neighbors v,'ere bc~nnin( to wort')' abouc the sketchy new element Machinist Richard Graham is a longriml atea tesident and has been knawu to take, hitupon occuiGn. Buthe even he draws the line at Estes' way of dOing bu,i.ne~ A few months after Estes opened the club, Gra. ham dropped off a pack.ge miStakenly delivered lothe YoTong addrrss. When Gra. ham lSK~the lll.1I1 behind thecoWlrer how business was holdinc up, he offer~ 10 set him up with a physici.a.n for $Zoo. ~l asked them how their openoon works. and they told me you just need a note from the doc- tor, and ~ hr.ot. doctor. and you can get a nore for jwt about anything... G~am lIys. -Then he told me the pric-~s. the registra. tion fee to gn the note. $200 per year. J got whit I thought was an ;aggressive s.les pilch. He said their doctor wiU help me gel it. He looked at me IIld profiled me, said 'You're 51. you'" got uthritis. ,...e can help you.'_1 just got the wpreuion that the$!! are people in it 10 seU marijuana l.i a busi- ness. I didn't feel thai these were people motivated to help sid people. wh:ch I think !'fher pt'(\ple are. lr w~~ ~ d~dJ~'::"undif!_ ical aunosphere, let's put it that "'3'V:' . In fact, Esfu'cpe-raoon was soundinical that it even adveltised in the B~'Tkdory Daily Planee. Superimposed Over the image of a big fu bud, the club announced tholt it h:ad plcnry o{ poc for s:tle, li.sting killer strains such as "Jad frost, Mad M:u. ~:nulin, G. Spot, .nd more.~ Olnt'r club opernors groaned in dismay when the~' read the notice: ''One. source shopping fC'~ all )'OUr Ill1,'Jlcin:allleeJs!fir:>1 \'isi[.lin: =.l1O fret v,ithtnllnaonofthisad:N ' Soon. kids wt~lining up oUt!;;de, neigh_ bors and police report. Vld the du~'s btisie:;t hour "'as berween three ;llhl i~';.Ir in Ih~ .fte~n, wilen Berk~ley High sr.ld~nts gO( out of e1nss. 'Thebiggest complac;l was the kids goin, in and out Df Ihert. ~ uys Li(!u_ tenant Al Yuen, head of the Berkeley Police Department's Special Enforcem~nt Unit, \vruch handlcsnarc()liC$im'e~tig3lioru, "We looked into that and WItched kids going in Mid out. We never caught him selling to kids without a card He claims thar the kid:s had medicin.:l.l card~, buthe doesn't l.:etp records on wbo he sel11lO, _ He was advertising in the papers, he allowed Ions oHids going though his place. He didn't have a screening process, didn't have seauity," In fact, Tn.inor told the DA's office that Estts J;old his product to lInyone with the c:lSh. Sbe esdmared th~t seventy percent of the club's buyt'r5 were palienlS from the O~md co.op.,)J1d tNl the otherthiny per- cent werr recnationa.! U5ers. And Trainor 311eged that evlt'n mlny oC the so.caUed patients mOlY hIVe had fraudulent doctor's notes. She claimed Ihat Estes nCerred everyone .....ithout a card to Dr, Frank Lucido, a Berkeley famiJy pn,ctitioner who allegedly ciwxed a fee for every note. "Estes would tell his buyers 10 go to Lucido, gin him $2IS, and he would give the peNOn a prescription. _ Trainor said that regudJess ol whether a buyer told Estes they had a medical problem or not, Estes would refer the buyer to Lucido to gl!tthe pr","pooo." one such nOle from Lucido's ornde. The p~rient is a mere 21 years old 3.nd suffers from back pain. Lucido says he used 10 "Tife such nOles IUId rei}' on patiena to provide verification later. Bur he says he discontinued tlm prac. lice two years ago, and now requires inde. pendent verification of his paliencs' Iii. ments from another physician. Lucido SIYS Estes has been a headache Cor his medici1l practice, Two yeus ago, the doctor says, Esles printed bwinesscards that claimed he wu working in conjunction with Lucido. Thf physiclan S<I)'S thac as soon as hit lound out, he had ala'ol.-yer call Esles and tell him to $topmakingthacclaim immed~lely. "I'm not cOMected with the clubs, and 1 don't re/tr people to che dubs," he says. "l.rn sure people mention my name, but it"s nevltr the , case that we work in conjWlction ~;th each other," Lucido said he couldn't remember Stacey Trainor. Why Is Trainor telling so many wes out of schoon It aU bepn two years ago. when she began an affair with Rocky Gnmner. The feud culminated on August .n, 2000, when Trainor swore out a temporary restraining order against Estes, claiming that Estes threatened to kill her. When the custody dispute. "That's false, not O'Ue at :Ill," he says. "No, I didn't sell the salons. J dido't sell cocaine. She .....as lying bltcause she thought she was moVing to Canada with che kids, and she thoughl that belore she leh, she could thiow a bunch of stuff in the mix to mess me up in COUrt. Because she downright hates: me (or dumpirag her.'" It was bad enough when neighbors lVatched police r-aid the dub and kids line up for .....eed - then me robberies began. ON THE EVENING of Friday, Octo- +. . ber U, 2001, the dub.....as winding '.\ down alter a long day when some. one knocked on the door. An , employee pulled the: door open and stared nralght down the bllJ"rd of a siI. ver hllld~ "We opened up thedoor,same as rot everybody: 'Hey, what's upr" Estes uys. "The guys came in. They put every. body on th1! ground and took everything," Timewas nuuUngOUt for E.stes. Tbe kids and the police raids were bad enough, but nowmenwcf'twzVinggwu: arDWld and rac. ingoff with drugs. At the time, Estes had no ,security guards, no ironpte on the door. just I lot of cuh and pOl. Soon, the other pot-club operators came a~'. The rob- scrutinized :is much as me." Not only did the guards nOI sit ""eO with the neighbotJ, they also didn'~ Hop the crime. On the evening o( Decembu 13, 2001, as the guards had drifted back into the club and Estes' employees began suck- ing the chair" one last patient, a }'oung woman, knocked on the door. As an emplo)'ee opened the door lor hu, he glanced down 10 his leEt Uld saw welt men crouched low. The woman tllrned and walked back to the sidewalk and the men rusht'd through the door. One puUed Qut an Uzi submachine gun, IDd the sf:(ond rob- bery in two months was UDder way, ThedUtves probably wouldD't ~ kept comlogbad: if there bada', beenso Dluch to steal Estes tthacs tonyhow much pot was lost during the first robbery, but he says he kepi an average of three pounds of dried marijuan. in his SUll't at alJ t:i.n:lu "Some or it wu in'ountes, some o( it In eighths, prepackaged in I "mety ol amounts," he says. "Plus we had Iwh. we had kiltC we had oils and other t'XtrICtS from marijuana. We had bued goods. brownies, carrot cakes, Reese's peanut butter cups that were done like that, We had everything." At S65 an eighth, that meant thugs-could make of( Trainor ~d she kne..... how Lucido oper. aled because she Went through the process ll~f'1t!/f, During her interview. she medcu. lously described her visit from stan to fin. Ish. "Trainor,went to the doctor's oflice, where she meta nurse who collected $215 from her, She wa:s brought into an eum room. where she wailed llntil Lucido came in and asked herwhal she wanted. She told him she hlld a bId b3Ck md 'ol',)J1ted 3 pre. :~'riplion fO! m~rijl'~na. Tr~lnM "l\id th~ doclor performed a mini phrsit"a1, checked. hltr blood pressure. 3nd had her bend over backward to check the condition of her back. .~ Lucido then wrote her a prescrip- tion for marijuana. Lucido did not ask her questions about aeatmfntordiagnosis from 3ny other ph,'sidan, Lucido ga,'e her no advice on the :Ilflountofm3J"ijuana 10 use IUld did not od\'i~ her oran)' other ther.ll,py or mt"Jic,:lIioo lhlt mi,hr lTe~r b:H:~k rmb. i"llIs. LudJo JiJ not Icllller 10 etome h:Jck , for D follow-up eXam." for a while. Estes n.ys, he even accepted photocories of Lucido's notes. IInd neil,!'h. bors used 10 lind them Iinerin!(: lhe side. walk in fronl ofru, club. One f1eighoor, who ;asked not 10 be OAmltd, slill has a copy or ' L:lf;a)'1I!ne cops arrived at his house co serve It, they lound morlf: plants growin~ in the basement, Back went Estes into the pokey, and the cops even raided the club and seized prodUC1 and fUW\Cial records. 1\\'0 months later, Ldayerce narcotics agents raided CruMer's owo houSlf: and seized sr\'enteen pounds of ma.rijuan~. Trainor enntu311y broke otfher affair, Cronner cDuld not be reached for comment, !;b:: m'mths :IIW. as !:5t~S beO:Jme -the subject of a I.:ontr:l COSta district ;U'lorney investigation, Trainor met with assistant district attorney Phyllis frWS8Jld County in\"tstigafor Tony Arc3do. Over the coune of several hours, she lold the ston' of Iheir life together, ^~cordine 10 her stalement, ESfes didn'l 5t3ft his nil"" clreltr de~ling medica..! pot - but cocaine. "After sellh;g thc titnninguJon, Estes eamed income by selllngr:ocJl,ine," Arc:1dll wrOle in his sum. nul"}' QfTr:'linor'~ inh:n'irw. "Tr,\:;Jer (sic] ~aid the incume from Ihe coc3in~ ousino:u rlln out in ~9"'3, Jl,nd ESlessl,-ilchltd loslIlI. inrmariju::rna," . ESlt's ...ehllm~mlr denies ih... cn.lJ'J:e 3J1d claims that Trainor, who declined 10 com- ment ror this scory, is lyingas pan of 3 child. bel')' pUI new hut on 311 of them us Citr 'with about 525,000 with one quick hit, to CouneUmember Linda Maio scarted making say nothing of the casb he kept on hmd. noises. Don Duncan from ,the Berkeley with this, the city had fiully h3d Pa.tients Croup visited the club and found it enough. City Councilmember Lind:t M:tio pleasant enough. but Esteshad dearly failed convened a neighborhood meering about fO implemenl even basic security proce. the ~Iub - .....hich Estes didn't bother to dures. "There weren't a lot of people attend - snd told the rest o{ Berktley's around, the club W:IS rairly desened. :lnd c:mnabis di~pen5lries 10 bring their col. thai was a secwilychallenge." Duncan says. league 10 heel ~I called Don DW\(iJQ and his "And the front pte was a problem." folks and said, you 8U)"S have to be part or When Duoe",n sU.l!,\tesled ret~ininl!sltcu. Ihl.' solution hltre,~,she SlVS. "It'! ~ot Ok3v ri", p~rsoMel, Estes rrspolllJt1J b)' hlrmg a th.u fhis n3pp(n~, ilmi its .noc ;)<.:~c~'~~olt:' if couple of guys h~ knew from around town. chis is just a rare thing. Don kno\\'s that thisNelghborsand police representarives claim is not accepuble - he Utlderstand$ Ul3t this that this jUst made thingt worse. The men wouldjeopardizethewhoJemo\~ment ifil's ~'ere not professional guards, and scared nltowed to get worse,'" people ;)Way from the neighborhood by loi. Estes' new office managft. Dord: lerine on the sid~walk ,jurin~ bu'iness Geshuri, sat dnwn with Cit}, ~I~nager houT$. E.ues S3)'S the neighbors .are giving ''Iddon Rucker aod police ortki:lJs, ~od wayt!) dleirown racist (e:&n. "Uyou talk to other Alliance members, and logether Ihem. they're big, soft, easygoing guys," he the)' hammered out a series of reforms, ~:l,'5. "Bllt unfonun:nelv Ihe,"re t.1:lck. And Oil J311U3f\' 2, Geshuri ~v:ret'd 10 fhe fo]- in Ihis society, \'Ou thWt of black :u: crimi. lu\\'inglerms: Ihe club \>'o'uld ooiy oper:1!e n31. So the ~o~enl you see black people five hours:l day; less th:tn a pound of dope st:tJldinil' o1/'ound, looking:tt rour 10.1 guess '\'ould ,be on Ihe premises: newspapl!r it looks liLt" II crllck houst. I 03\'e bl;)ck :rd\'crtisinK .....ould stop immedi:llely: ;a (riends, ~d th:lt seems 10 be ho:ld llj:::linSI professional security compan)' would be me, None or Ihe olher dubs seems (0 be retained: and security _"nU"",p.C.18 usthynpt"us..:om JULY 24.30. 2002 EAST frAY ~1~rru~7$S 17 , . " '". 1'.. ...' , A 8 ~ - Wide variety of toys and treats I~ .- . - Friendly, knowl~dgeable service ~- . - Servmg the Ber1<eley r ~'~ . community for o~e~ ten y~ars . -Competitive pnces \ '.Fair trade coffee and tea ANI L FARM.~'T: .;p'ET s. D AND SUPPLIES I"", '1531 SAN . BERKELEy' 526-2993 OPEN 9-7 .,......":1!::II"'I'.1.1.'.I".'t',!.:"'!;'I!t'!11'"'J",III"fllll" I Pot Club Californians for Compassionue Vse. WttIIlDe4mlll p;olAl17 orpniurion th~t thought up Proposh 215. has joined zhe"Comminer an MI Concenu in opposinrthe bill. But get this: the registry syslen strictI)' ,oluntary, Vasconcellos' hi! mo~ fOCUsed on reining in W police.. so it barely dwells on reining in mediI pot cuhivllors. The new cards of absolute protection (rom scary Mac County sheriffs. but in refurn h( porienu and nregivtrs must operl usponsiblr. For oper.to,", in progress cirie, tUth as B~keley and Oakland. w already co lrIO'I'e in the IighCof day, thel no incentive to sign onto Ute du!. And through I unnge accident ofhirtory, m~ ijuan.a SftmsLlytortmain the least.n uJated ingtilible substan~ in Califomii . Of Course, good old.(ashioiled dr laws fI'UIy solve the Ken Estes problem I us. Assistant diuricc anorney Phy!: Franh ofCobtTa Costa Coun~il prepJ Ing to try EsttS 00 f(lur felonies stll'auni from the Concord uids, .and if conviCf( he'll bc OUt olbuslncu. This brinp PI' the final lepl quenil . unresolved by Proposition 2JS: how I prOSecutors determine whttbtr som one it altgaJly sanctioned cartgiver, or dnlg de..lrrr The aoswer is then is t anSWet. District anoroeys arouod t} nate have relied 00 couoting pot plant If you've gOt too many, you mun be dealer. Howmany planu is too manrr l\ one knows. While I handful of chit n,ch as Br-rkeley have capped th amount of 1'01 clnoabis clubs can ha~ on hand. pro.~tors more t}"'JIically CY' bat! the plaJIls and make a simple jud( ment calL Thn's what tbey"lI'e done wit Eues, but the sr-tem Is bardlr predse. UEstesis (onvicted, he v.iII pay a te/"ri ble p.riee for this lack of precision; th chuges Carryl possible pri$Oo seatence (; thru years and eight months. But IW C'OtlI pin reputation also could be '.undcre, overnight \\'hen ESfts Nmed hirnseU I~ fort)' deluolUtt'ltors accompa.o.ied him to the station. lind'his UugC' _ the mlftyt 0 medk:aI D:luijuana., ptnteUted by vindi<: . rive prosecutors - wu fluhed acrou thl nighdy news throughout me Bay Are3. Stacey Tninor's: alIegatioDS 2..\ide', Kel ESIes Stems a kind, ~ntrous man, nad] to take YOII Into his comp.ny at I moment!s notice. But norhin;: out thett ciln protetl us from his tendency to truS! the wrong people, of whom there are stili plenty in Ihe ahadowy, twilight world 01 marijuana. Estes admits be's made somt mistakes, and vows to improve his operl' tion. .We beg:ln 'something here-, and we didn't how where it would gc," he says. "I've made miu;lIl.:ts in UtrOSPC1:1. but we tried to work it out, Stacey and all that stuff "'.as a bill; problem - I h~J no prob. Il!ms bd(lfe rhat. J bclil!'ve J know who's behind this, the robberies. All Ihis sruff that's lone on has happened since Stilcer wcnt to the police, ;lInd Ihe police believed her. They told me Ih3t many times women tllm on Iheir drug.duling boyfriends, OInd this seems lile a case o( that. J wi,,. I couJd ha~ hired ~tter peo- ple-but I c.n'tuy that I would h:rve done' IInythin~ differenc. I reallr didn.t foresee' the (riminal c1em~nt m.:tkinl!" !!:' orel'l:nn' like it did. BUf I c..n onl)'do so :nuch.~ And should Elte's re'vert 10 his old, seu~o(-his.pants W.:trs, we mil' h"'e no choi('~ bUI to pur up wilh him. . . camcraS would be installed. The final robbery on June 5 spelled the end fOf Ken Estes. Despite his promi.s~ not to kee'p more rhan a pound o( pot It th~ store. neighbors reporr that during the' getaway, the robbers' duffel bag wu so hravy that they h.ad (f) drag Ir down to the. cu. As for the security CQm~rQS, club offi. cials claimed tbat the'Y had mysteriously brolr;en down chat dav. and there was no film o( rhe incident. E~tes had used \Jp his last store o( good faith. and even the other dubs a~d he had to go. "I don't think Ken is a bad guy, bur if's no longer approprilte for him tooperate in Ber1cele'Y" DUnCUi hyS. "Theconsensw of th~ Alliance is (or Ken to leave the city, to either mo'e on or find another career. That coridusion has been some time in coming. We're happy to hollVe him as ;, hiend. but it's II'- the best intcrest of the patiel'-ts dut Ken dose (or re..J." Duncan's Ibandonment has left Estes fairly bitter. .Yuh, they don't wlnt the competition," he' says. "TMyun keep the . prices high, and thty can control the pme. Jt'sbusiness, it's.a1J about busin~ss. If you're Starbuck. you want het"t out of . town.. Still. Estes has finally agre:ed to get. outO(lown. He, his brother ~dv Moses, and Geshuri have signed .. Ie'ase ~t I new ~Iub in Oakland, near the corner of)Sth So-e'ec and Broadway, where he promise'S to.tighten up security. The numerous car deaJerships have given in this POI" of town its historic name. "Auto Row," but it should ruJlv bc called "Pot Row." Virtu. &1ly aJl the Pot clubs In Oakland a~ c1us. tcrtd in this ncighborhood, and they'rc not happy to se~ Estes join them. If Estes wants to defy Jones. his new neighbors, the cops, and "the entire cit), of OnkJaad, there's not much Ulfcne clln do about it. Linda Maio WllS a~ ,..1031 when it brlefh'looked likc Estes h;lld decided to nay U; Berkeley; she ineffecruaJlr thrcat_ ened 10 circ:ulate 31 petition and prepau a nuisance complaint. As (at, say, an under- (O'.cr operation to catch Estes selling to customers without. v;lllid doctor's notc, she never considered that option for a sec. and, and police won't say whether they did. If this the hest"locaJ gO'tmrnent can do. Estes is in the de.:tr. But medical marijuana's e:r:r of r:rw capitalism rn.ry he coming 10 an end. State Senuor John Vlsconcdlos h:rs drafted I new bill regularingthe industry, and now that it has the support orboln the Califor- ni;ll District Attamers' Associ,arion and thc C.:tli(ornia Slate Sheriffs' ASSod:rdon, Governor Davis has indk..ted that he might sip' it. The bill would est.rblish a Hatewide re!rlstry of medkal-m:rrijuan;ll Ntic!D1S :Jnd caregiven. who would rteeh.e' a card C'crtifyingtheir mediCtlI sta. tus. Phvsici.rns would submit candidates for medical pot to Ihe county HC:lhh Departmenl, which would appro"e or reject Ilpplicanl$ bUe'd on a review of the .:Jeeut3l:'\'oftht medical records. The' state Depari~ent.of Health Services would develop ngularions that define' how much rot dlspens:rries cOIn /trow .nd store, "~.J':I!1:,illc Ihe m.:tn\' nebullllls OIll.'Stjttn5 ~urrounding how pot clubs currently get Iheir wholesale producl. AI.rhollgh the bill's primllt). illtent is to pro,ceet pnienrs fJcin~ rt';)ctinn311. :Jnu unjusr IIrrests. che bill couldh3Ve the second:uy effect o( reg- ul.:tlin~ c\llth'lIlon. This m:rr expl::lin why E......dIllt.""""~__DDm P LA 11 N U M lliffmnt desilJll3for difJerrnt peoPle~.~ .~ " . , . ~~';.l' ~ . .'...,:t...., .. . e: ~ .' ,,' ". .. 7k14~ m~IU~H~IU CoUl, Pun'UM. & CEMS . O~lU<esda'-Saturday " 644-1&40 ' . .2:910 Canep AftnlH,. BotRc!.y '-1 . ~~.. .:~~:' .:. I '.'~',~.~, ~~lli~-Mi b.f;if1:~'. .\.~ .,," . . .. '("~'. til'! .;I@m !l" . . . !~r:m!~mIJS 4ll 9Illlml . m.III.lOll .::.::m:i!U. Tas::illlJ:.lll, rr:m':1f:llRf t_.......IiIit....~I.."""'.._, .. EAST'I"\' [X'JlESS JULY 2e.)0, 2002 .u;'b<lvupr.n.c:o... Concord Police Departn.,nt Date: August 29, 2005 To: Mayor and Council Members From: David Livingston, Chief of Police. Subject: Medical Marijnana Dispensarie., - Potential Secondary Impacts Thc purpose of this memorundum is 10 provide a summary .of additional background information regarding the pvoposed ordinance which would prohibit the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Concord. Police Department staff believes it is important to identify some onhe pOlenlial secondary effects on public safety by the opcration of marijuana dispensaries. In researching this issue, Captain Crain reviewed a memorundum from ~ocklin Policc Chicf Mark Siemens dated July 13,2004, which addressed the sccondary effects as observed by Rocklin police staff. The memorandum was in reference to pending consideration by the Rocklin City Council of a proposed ordinance to rcgulate the establishment of mcdical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Rocklin. In Ilis memordndum. Chief Siemens addressed a variety of community safety concerns that had been expressed by a number of agencies .throughout Northern California. While the City of Rocklin had no experience with dispensarics, othcr ncurby communities did. The ugencieshe polled were Roseville, Oakland, Hayward and Fairfax police departmenls as well as Ihe Lake County Sheriff's Omce. All five agencics expressed similar conccms or experiences. Thosc concerns included, but were not limited to: l> Street level dealers attempting to sell to people cntering the business l> Smoking of marijuana in public areas )> Increased "driving while under the influence of marijuana" violations l> Altcmpted burglaries of marijuana establishments )> Robberies of clicnts as they lelt businesses with their purchase l> Adverse impact on neighboring businesses . ')> Presence of a physician on the premises issuing prescriptions for use, which drew numeroas people from out of the area . )> Lack.of effort on the part of dispensary owners/employees to control unlawful or nuisance behavior in and around the business l> Increased loitering and associated nuisances )> Complaints that other illegal drugs were sold from the dispensaries )> Truding of murijuana purchused at a dispensary to a minor for sex )> Purchuscrs congregating and smoking marijuana in arcijs frequented by children )> . Sales of malijuana to persons not holding the nppropriute cellificate . ...... . The representativcs of each of the agencies polled by Chief Siemens expressed regret thutthe dispensaries existed in thcir respective communities. Elich was struggling wilh the immedi(lle impacts and developing a method by which to regulute such businesses. DISCUSSION There are two medical marijuuna dispensaries currently operating in the Cily of Concord. Onc. is located al2155 Colfax Street, and the olhcr is located ut 1120 Contra Costa Blvd. While the Police Depanment has no rccord of any complaints related to the busincss on Colfax Streel, the dcpartment has responded to a citizen's complainl rcgarding activity associated with Ihe business on Contra Cosea Blvd. That complaint was referred to the Police Depanment by the City Attorney's Orlice, on July 26, 2005. A representalive of a neighboring business called to report that a "bad element" was loitering near the dispensary and "harassing" femule customers of the complaining business. Officer Ken <;:arlson investigated the complaint and found no such activity at thc time of his conta,cJ; however, Officer Carlson has continued 10 monitor the activity near the dispensary and is prepared to lake the appropriate action against any criminal violations or nuisunce issucs. While the City of Concord has responded 10 only the one complaint to date, it is likely thut the cily would cxperiencc an increase in complaints similar to those reponed hy the agcncics referenced in this memorandum if additional dispensaries wcre authorized. The chance of such activity will also Iikcly increase lIS word sprcads about the existencc of the two dispensaries currently operating in the City of Concord. In addition to facts provided in Chief Siemens' mcmor~ndum, thcrc have been two recent evcnts of particular note in our region. The first incident was a recent robbery of a dispensary und . homicide in unincorporated San Leandro and the second was a revocation of op'erating aUlhorization for a dispensary by lhe Ci:.' of Modesto. Sail l.ealldro - UI/incorporated Area On August 19,2005, a number of subjccls concealcd themselves near the cntrancc 10 the facility prior t.o the opening of the business. The subjects then confronted arriving employees at gunpoint and forced them into the building where they committed a "luke over" robbery of marijuana and cash. An employee retrieved a firearm that was kept althe busin'ess for protection and exchanged gunfirc with the robbers. One of the suspected robbers later died fmmwounds received in the shootout, . A representative of lhe Alameda County Sheriff's Office advised Concord staff that not unlike Concord's experience, the Sherifrs Orlice had also received very few complaints relative to thc. operation of the medical marijuana dispensaries in the unincorporated area. In fuet, mQst eri minul invcstigations did not involve the actual operation of the dispensary but inslead the robberies of individuals after they left the facility. The victims were targeted for the marijUana they had just purchased. Mi:l.lki.1 M;"iJllUII:lI)jsr~ns:lri(ll- ~11;IlJUl'lllt&lIm III ('('lInl'ill'\lll=\J~1 ~S. ~nos) 2 0" .. In July of 2005, the Alameda County Bo~rd of Supervisors passed ~n ordinance regul~ling the c"istence of medical marijuana dispensmies. The ordinancc calls for a three-part, comprehensive inspection. First, lhe Shetiffs OfFice is also now authorized to conduct thorough background investigations on .ull dispensary operators. The other two componcnts arc a facilily inspection by the County Health Department and II code inspection by ihe County Building Depanmenl. Alameda County limits the number of dispensaries to a total of lhree in the unincorporated area, bascd on total populalion of those areas. City of Modesto The City of Modesto had adopted an ordinance that allowedmatijuana dispensaries hUI required regulation of'lhose dispensaties. Their ordinance also included provisions for the revocation of a previously issued permit, however, there was very Iilllc enforcemenl. The ordinance w.s vaguely wrillen allowing a dispensary to open as long as Ihe owner/operalor complied with somc very general provisions. In fact, two dispensaties set up operJtion without knowledge of the Police Depanment and with no real desctiption of the true purpose of Ihe businesses. One of the two eventually ceased doing business in the city. . . The city began to reexamine its ordinance and (he City Council ultimately enacted an emergency ordinance placing a moratotium on all such operations. The .citythcn used the time petiod of the moratorium to proceed with a full prohibition on such busincsscs. The onc remaining marijuana dispensary was granted a grace petiod in which to prepare for pennanent closure. A Modesto Police Department representative reported that other than the potenlial for secondary public safety impacts, there were no issues of concern relative to either of the dispensaries. The actions by the City Council 10 enact a prohibition against such establishmenls were pmmptcd by Ihe June 6, 2005, U.S, Supreme Court decision in GOl/tilles v. R"i<'h. . The Concord Police Department joins in the recommendalion that the City Council enaclan ordinance prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Concord. . . cc. Lydia Du Borg, Cily Manager. Craig Labadie, City Allorney lI.'h:dicnlll.l:tfijuan:1 Oj~11(1~rie~ -1\1emm:InUo.lm htCmlnci' (A"$!tlJ:I.1S. 201151 .1 tie. b~ MEMORANDUM August 31, 2005 TO: Mayor Hoffmeister ,md Members of the City Council ,I !)t:!.. Lydia E. Du Borg, City Manager;\,.! C) FRO:\1: SUB,JECT: Marijuana Dispensaries, Supplemental Information This is to transmit a memo from Chief Livingston on pOlential gencral poblic safety effects of medical marijuana dispensary locations, and to provide a response to other questions raised regarding the proposed ordinance prohibiting the loculing of medical marijuana dispcnsories in Concord. The proposed ordinance is scheduled for hearing before the Council on September 6, 2005. To clarify, staff is not asking the Council to make a decision on medical use of malijuana, but on whether commercial marijuana dispensllricsshould be located in Concord. Peter Dragovich, Director of City Management, researched the issue of whethcr there is a "synthetic marijuana" available through regular medical prescription. Staff does not purponto be medical expens, but did discuss this information with a local medical professional. and staff provides the infonnation below and attoched. Marinol is an FDA approved "synthctic marijuana" also known as Dronabinol. The actil'e ingredient in Marinol is a synthctic form of delta-9-THC, the active natural compound in marijuana. Marinol is available by prescription in Califomia and other states and is used to treat nausea and vomiting in cancer and other patients and is also prescribed for appetite stimulation. "Mediclll marijuana" advoclltes will argue that while Marinol contains a synthetic form of the active ingredient in marijuana, it is not adequate for treating glulIc6ma, neurological conditions, or pain. Additional infonnation is available at www.marinol.com. (Web face page attached). Staff has also looked into the business license and taxable sales issues. Maricarc, the self- described medical marijuana dispensary on Colfax Street, has come into City offices to apply for a business license, and was referred to Planning fo.r zoning review. No application was made to Planning for review of confonnance of the use with zoning. as is required us pall of the pmcess. August ~ J, 2005 Page 2 Without zoning review, a business license is not issucd. Holistic Solutions on Contra Cosla Boulcvurd idcntif'ies itself as a rctail seller of health carc products, and was reviewed aS5ueh by Planning, and wus issucd a business Iiccnsc in May 2005. According the State Board of' Equalization, marijuana sales arc laxablc. Maric:tre and Holislic Solutions have nnl registcrcd with thc Board of Equalization, and 'Irc therefore not reponing any taxable s:des. Allachmcnts cc: Craig Labadie, City Allomcy Mark Boehme, Assistant City Allomey Chief Dave Livingston 1 Sept OS ~"',(~ . 9-/-0 S; /~ '-f*:c..- ~~ TO: CONCORD CITY COUNCIL AND CLERK FR: JOSEPH V. A. "Joe" PARTANSKY FRAIL ELDERL Y AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ADVOCATE SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING, SEPT. 6TH TO PROHIBIT ALL MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES In order to present a " balance" of materials and arguments to the City Attorney's staff report, please find the following: I) MariCare's "We Need Your Support" flier; 2) "Marijuana Dispensary Maintains Low Profile," Contra Costa Times, May, 2005; 3) Patients in the crossfire: Casualties in the War on Medical Marijuana (www.safcaccessno~.org, November, 2004, 78 pages); 4) Concord City Council Minutes, July 22 and Sept. 2, 1997; City Attorney's staff report, July 22, 1997. 5) "Talking Points: Medical Cannabis Dispensary Bans"; 6) Condition-Based Booklets on HlV/AIDS... total of 8, which are "peer reviewed." See web site w\vw.safeaccessnow. ore: 7) SALIS Conferees Guide to Medical Marijuana By Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky (lp., April, 2004). I bring to your attention the City Council minutes of July 22 and Sept. 2, 1997. Under California Government Section 65858, an initial moratorium and an extension, such as the one to Prohibit ADI Medical Marijuana Dispensaries, until July 17,1998, required two study group reports (10 days before each expiration date). They could have come from a joint Police .and Department of Community Development study group (as implied in staff report for July 22, 1997). There could have been contributions from an AD Hoc Community Task Force,with additional input from the Council's own Policy Development and Internal Operations Committee. Also ignored were Joseph Partansky's July 22, 1997 suggestion for a study group involving community members and pre-current Mayor Laura Hoffmeister's plea/suggestion "that the Mt. Diablo Unified School District be included in a study group if established "(Sept. 2'97). Consider MariCare's flyer. Sep as as 04:s4p ,. arete, inc. architecture ~irl: o. shelby. architect gary I. wheeler. architect tj'c t!J~~ Concord City Council City of Concord 1950 Parkside Drive Concord, CA 94520 C-c /!::1J~- <./17 ~/ tJ--Lc.. :l:"..L 'C ,y~' (2;4 (.~ September 6, 2005 RE: Ordinance amending Chapter] 8 Medical Marijuana Dispensaries To the Honorable Mayor and Council, I am unable to aHend this evening's City Council Meeting but would like to add my comments to tonight's discussion via this leHer. I am a business and properly owner in downtown Concord. near the site of an unlicensed Medical Marijuana Dispensary (MMD). While I support the concept of providing medicinal marijuana for real medical needs, I do not support the current MMD because of several reasons. When my company decided to purchase the building that we currently occupy os our office, we spent many hours developing fhe plans idenfifying the site layout. parking, and office spaces and presented them to the City of Concord Community Development Department for the proper approvals to convert a residence into a commercial building. We met wifh the neighbors. noticed all neighbors within the required distance and attended a pUblic hearing to obtain the required conditional use permi!. The process took almost five months. It is my understanding that the Current MMD does not have the proper approvals for its location. Parking is a major concern in the area where my office is located. Several other residential buildings have been converted to commercial use; the result is an ongoing daily parking problem. Now enter the current MMD. . There is a steady stream of cars coming and going daily. In front of our office is 0 !wo- hour commercial parking space that we had requested in order to provide 2289 bonifocio street concord, co 94520 925 692 5888 Sep 06 05 OS:07p an olt-street parking space for our clients to use when visiting our office. That space is often not available lor our use os cars pork there continually. In addition, usually the cars thaI come and pork here have occupants who remain behind while someone is purchasing their medicinal marijuana. This adds a certain character to our neighborhood that is unappealing. And we have hod on many occasions, the occupants sit outside their vehicles on our lown or on their cars. and they frequently deposit their trash and cigarette butts on our lawn area. Many times our clients have commented about the people sitting around in their cars. I firmly believe lhat if someone wants to open an MMD, lhey should seek and obtain the necessary approvals prior to opening. I also believe that they should not be located so Close to schools. as this one is. And. I do not believe that they. should be located in 0 residential neighborhood. but should be located instead inside 0 retoil space with adequate porking. The situation at our office is detrimental to running a professional office given the current problems related to this issue. One principal 01 our firm lives in Concord and wishes to have lhe business located in Concord. AI present. we would consider relocating out at Concord if the situation cannot be corrected. Thank you for your consideration and attention to this difficull and very sensifive subject. I look forward to hearing who I aclions you decide to take. eler. Architect p.l l-k.t ~",.vl>j . q_V-Or; (0. J-U"t'l.1 ANDERSEN & BONNIFIELD TELEPHONE: (925) 602.1400 ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CORPORATE CENTRE '320 WILLOW PASS ROAD. SUITE 500 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94520-5269 ifc ~~ ()/-^-1 It1.<- l;"",~ '- / FACSIMilE: 19251 825.Q143 September 6, 2005 Mayor Laura Hoffmeister City of Concord ] 950 Parkside Drive Concord, California 94519 Council member Mark Peterson City of Concord 1950 Parks ide Drive Concord, California 94519 Vice Mayor Susan Bonilla City of Concord 1950 Parkside. Drive Concord, California 94519 Councilmember William Shinn City of Concord 1950 Parkside Drive Concord, California 94519 Councilmember Helen Allen City of Concord 1950 Parks ide Drive Coneord, California 94519 Re: September 6, 2005 City Council Meeting Dear Councilmembers: Our office represents the legal interest of MariCare, a medical marijuana dispensary presently located in the City of Concord. We are writing to you today in reference to the September 6, 2005 City Council Meeting Item 4C proposing to amend the Concord Municipal Code to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries. We would strongly encourage the Council to study this issue further prior to voting on the proposed ordinance prepared by Staff. As Council is no doubt aware, medical marijuana has become an increasingly visible issue in the State of California as well as on a federal level. The application of marijuana as a medicinal drug has changed considerably over the years. Fifteen years ago, physicians would not recommend marijuana for medical use because few believed in its medicinal uses and those that did feared having their licenses to practice medicine revoked. Today, marijuana is seen as a drug with considerable medical value by mainstream physicians. In fact, the California Medical Board (the agency that licenses physicians in the State of California) provides information to physicians to assist in writing prescriptions for medical marijuana and advises Councilmembers September 6,2005 Page 2 that physicians who recommend the drug to their patients will not be subject to investigation or disciplinary action by the Medical Board. t . The California Medical Association has gone so far as to issue a 21-page document discussing the issuance of prescriptions to patients that have medical needs for marijuana.2 The support for medical marijuana extends far past the Medical Board. In 1996; Proposition 215 authorizing the use of medical marijuana was overwhelmingly passed by the voters of the State of California. . In the City of Concord, 30,416 voters representing over 64% of the vote, voted in favor of medical marijuana. Since 1996, support for medical marijuana has continued to grow, In 2002, Time Magazine reported that 80 % of the respondents supported allowing adults to legally use marijuana for medical purposes..3 In 2003, the State Legislature took up . Senate Bill 420 coneerning medical marijuana in an attempt to address some of the shortcomings of Proposition 215. This bill was passed 42 to 32 in the Assembly and 24 to 14 in the Senate and signed into law by the Governor on October 12,2003. . The ehief law enforcement officer in the State of California, Attorney General Bill Lockyer, has issued numerous opinions supporting medical marijuana under Proposition 215 and Senate Bill 420 including, but not limited to, recommending that law enforcement not arrest nor charge legitimate medical marijuana users' and advising the California Department of Health Services that they could continue to.issue identification cards for medical marijuana users without violating Federal Law.' Unfortunately, the United States Govenunent has chosen to ignore the growing evidence concerning the redeeming medicinal use of marijuana and continues to pursue its decades long policy of treating marijuana as a drug with no medicinal value. So while medical marijuana 1 May 12, 2004 news release by the Medical Board of California, "Medical Board Reaffirms its Commitment to Physicians Who Recommend Medical Marijuana." 2 California Medical Association, Document #1315 "The Compassionate Use Act of 1996: The Medical Marijuana Initiative" June 9, 2005. 3 Time Magazine, November 4,2002, "The New Politics of Pot." , Attorney General of California "Bulletin to All California Law Enforcement Agencies" dated June 9, 2005 and June 22,2005. . 5 July 15, 2005 Attorney General of California letter to Robert D. Tousignant, Deputy Director and Chief Counsel, Department ofHe:l!th Services, concerning "Department of Health Services's Questions Regarding Medical Marijuana Identification Cards and Federal Law." Councilmembers . September 6. 2005 Page 3 usage is permitted under state law' and supported by the medical community, it remains unlawful under Federal Law. City Staff has chosen to take the position of recommending that the Council follow federal law rather than the will of the people of Contra Costa County, the State of California, the Medical Community, and the Attorney General of California and recommend City Council ban any dispensary that provides medical marijuana for patients with a doctor's prescription although a physician has deemed it medically necessary. It is ironic that the Staff Report takes the position that "the alternative of establishing land use and operational regulations for medical marijuana dispensaries would put the City in the position of approving an activity which violates Federal law ." In the past the City has taken the position of ignoring strict enforcement of Federal Law. In 2000. the City pledged $120.000 to establish a day labor center on Monument Boulevard the primary purpose of which was to provide for a gathering place for day laborers who at the time gathered on Monument Boulevard. This funding was provided with the knowledge that many of these workers are undocumented and reside and work in California in direct violation of Federal immigration laws. Yet in acting in a forward-thinking manner, the City decided to support such a center and benefit the enti~e community. ' Medical marijuana is remarkably similar to the issue the City faced with day laborers in 2000. Does the City choose to enforce Federal law which the Federal Goverrnnent is not actively enforcing or instead act in a forward-thinking manner and look for viable alternatives that serve the needs of its community prior to voting on this issue? I would strongly encourage the council to consider their alternatives. I) The Council could vote against the present proposal. 2) The Council could examine this issue more carefully before making a final decision concerning dispensaries. There are many factors that the Council should consider prior to passing such an ordinance concerning dispeusaries, such as the medical needs of the local community and the impact in the City. A City Council Committee could be formed to review and investigate the issues carefully and make an informed recommendation to the full City Council. 3) The City could pass the present Ordinance as proposed by Staff. Passing such an Ordinance would be premature given the limited information that has been provided in the Staff Report. Specifically, Staff fails to address effects that such Councilmembers September 6,2005 Page 4 a passage may have. Patients who presently require medical marijuana will continue to need medical marijuana regardless of what action the City takes. 4) The City should also seek the advice and recommendations of medical professionals since this is truly a medical issue. MariCare wishes to be a productive member of the community, wishes to work with the City to provide the needed medical service and would like to relocate to a different location within the community that is zoned as retail commercial and not located near any residences or schools. Since its opening in January, 2005, MariCare has had stringent standards for how medical marijuana is provided to its members. It requires that the member present a written prescription from a licensed physician as well as a photo ID. That prescription is then received, MariCare looks up the name of the issuing physician on a separate list and contacts that physician to confIrm that the prescription is valid. Once a patient has met those requirements, MariCare then issues them a tamper-proof photo ID that identifIeS the patient as having been through the screening process and eligible to receive medical marijuana. The Staff Report also refers to a potential increase in crime resulting from the establishment of dispensaries and cites a dispensary that was robbed in San Leandro. It interesting that the Staff Report is silent a/.lout increased crime as a result of MariCare operating in the City, presumably because there has not been any increase. MariCare believes that because it self-regulates itself stringently that it has not created any additional burden on the City's police department and is unaware ofany crime issues associated with its business. The City is in a unique position of being able to move forward with this. issue in a proactive manner even though the Federal Government has not advanced with the times. It is not unusual for the Federal Government to trail medical science and the needs of society. Let us not forget a few other issues thai the Federal Government failed to address in a proactive manner slavery, allowing women the right to vote, and giving equal protection and access to individuals as part of the civil rights movement. At one time in this country,' it was considered acceptable for individuals to hold slaves, for women to be excluded from voting or holding political offIce, and to discriminate against minorities. As we reflect on the past, it is clear that while Federal law allowed such acts to occur, the Federal Government was wrong in doing so. The Council should ask itself, when they review their action in 10 - 15 - 20 years, will they be able. to look back at themselves as being leaders that helped effect a change for the better? Or were they merely followers that helped to continue a policy that in the end will likely be found to be wrong. I think this question cannot be answered without the Councilmembers September 6, 2005 Page 5 Council taking the time to form a Committee to review this issue fully arid report back to the full Council. Very truly yours, CARY D. McREYNOLDS CDM:kc cc: Client J:\MARICARE\L TR\CONCORD2. wpd Exhibit D I I I ~---- I celtify ~r~btie //Ji~ume~n~,s,~ff: SEAL ~ ..,...' . u . Cilyo( REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE CONCORD CtTY COUNCtL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER 1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE CONCORD, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 27,2005 The Coneord City Council and Redevelopment Agency met In a regular joint meeting on Tuesday, September 27,2005 in the Council Chambers. The meeting convened at 6:40 p.m. with Vice Mayor/Agencymember Bonilla presiding. Mayor Hoffmeister was absent. The pledge to the flag was led by Councilmember Allen.. Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of September 26, 1966. ROLL CALL COUNCllMEMBERS PRESENT: COUNCtLMEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE WHO ADDRESSED COUNCil: PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Heten Allen, Mark Peterson, Bill Shinn, Susan Bonilla Laura Hoffmeister Lydia Du Borg, City Manager; Mary Rae Lehman, City Cierk;Mark Deven, Assistimt City Manager, Graig . Labadie, City Attorney; David Livingston, Chief of Police, Peggy Lefebvre, Director of Finanee, Joan Carrico, Director of Community and Recreation Services, Cherie Rosenquist, Director of Human Resources; Ron Puccinelli, Direetor of Information Technology; Peter Dragovich, Director of City Management; Jim Forsberg, Director of Planning and Economic Development Phillip Arndt, Concord; Gary Wheeier, Concord; Scott Wilson, Concord; Michaet Snow, Concord; Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky, Concord; Dan Helfrey, Concord; Charlotte Taliaferro, Concord; Chuck Carpenter, Concord; Jeanae D. Hope, Concord; Ed Streto, ConcOrd: Gram Hodess, Martinez; Scott Kronland, San Francisco; Cary McReynolds, Concord; Kirk Shelby, Concord Phillip Arndt, employee of Comcast and Chair of the Chamber of Commerce, announced Comcast's upcoming "Comcast Cares Day" scheduled for Saturday, October 1, 2005 at the MI. Diablo High School from 8:30 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. He explained that this annual event allows the Comcast employees to partner with high school students, teachers, and administrators to do landseaping, painting, and other light maintenance, and invited the Council to attend. He also announced that the Concord Greater Chamber of Commerce had recently hired new President and CEO, Keith McMahon, a Concord resident, who will begin his duties onOctober 17, 2005. City CouneiVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 27, 2005 PRESENTATION - Concord Business Recoonition Awards Following a report by Dwayne Dalman, Redevelopment Specialist, Vice Mayor Bonilla, with the assistance of Councilmembers Peterson and Allen, presented recognition awards to Cynthia Liu, President and CEO of En9ineering Remediation Resource Group; Jeff Woods, JCM Partners; and Adrees Sharza, General Sales Manager, Concord Hyundai. ANNOUNCEMENTS Vice Mayor Bonilla announced an opening for Concord's representative on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Citizens' Advisory Committee for a two-year term ending January 31, 2008, and advised Friday, December 2,2005 as the deadline for receipt of applications. City Manager Lydia Du Borg, introduced the City's new Finance Director, Margaret "Peggy" lefebvre, and welcomed her to the City. CITY COUNCil MATTERS ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 05-8 - 2004 California Eleclricat Code. Titie 24 Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to adopt Ordinance 05-8 entitled, "AN. ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 14, (BUilDINGS AND BUILDING REGULATIONS), ARTICLE VII (ELECTRICAL CODE), SECTION 14-181 ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE 2004 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE AND DELETING SECTIONS 14.183 AND 14.184 OF THE CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE." Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peter.son, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05.63 - Skvler Estates Residentiat Subdivision Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to adopt Resolution 05-63 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 7919, SKYLAR ESTATES SUBDIVISION, ASSESSOR'S ~ARCEL NO. 120-121-028;" to approve the Subdivision Agreement for the 3-acre parcel located at 1106 Alberta Way; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote. of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister ADOPTION OF RESOlUnON 05.66 -Montecito Subdivision ~"j '. :, , . Motion was' made by Allen and seconded by Shinn t6 adopt HesoliJtion 05-66. entitled, "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 8437, MONTECITO SUBDIVISION," 'an 85-acre parcet on the south side of Ygnacio Valley Road at Cowell Road, Assessor's Parcel Nos. 135-120-022 and 135-120-023, including drainage facilities, sewer facilities, street widening, and other improvements required for the development of 183 single family .. residential lots; and to release the obligation of the bonds posted with the Subdivision Agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister 2 I I I City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 27, 2005 I ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-64 - Silverleaf Residential Subdivision Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to adopt Resolution 05-64 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 8759, SILVER LEAF SUBDIVISION, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 116-070-006 AND 116-203-006," a 4.04.acre property located on the northeast side of Ctayton Road opposite Newhall Parkway; to approve the Subdivision Agreement; ,and to authorize the City Manager to ex~cule the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council. A YES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Holfmeister ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-62 - Centre Pointe Subdivision Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to adoplResolution 05-62 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP FOR TRACT 8815, CENTRE POINTE SUBDIVISION, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 113-241-061,-063, -065, -066, AND -079," at the northeast intersection of Clayton Road and The Alameda consisting of 9.9 acres; to approve the Subdivision Agreement; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council. A YES: 'Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT:. Hoffmeister ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS - 2005 Slurrv Seal Prooram. RFO# 2008 I Motion was made by Allen and seeonded by Shinn to accept improvements for the 2005 Slurry Seal Program, RFO #2008, constructed by Bond Blacktop, Inc.; and to direct the City Clerk to file a Notic:e of Comptetlon. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None SETTING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - Seren Innovations, Ine. ABSENT: Holfmeister Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to set a public hearing for Tuesday, October 11, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to review a request by Seren tnnovations, Inc. to transfer its cable television franchise for the cable television system it operates in Concord, California to Astound Broadband, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of WaveDivlsion Holdings, LLC of Kirkland, Washington. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: A YES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: HOffmeister ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE 05-9 - Amendment to Concord Municipal Code - Prohibition of Medical Mariiuana Dispensaries This item was pulled from the agenda by Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky who stated that medical marijuana is used as a pain and nausea medication and that the people who need this medicine, in his opinion, should be able to obtain it. I DM Helfrey, a 12-year resident of the community, expressed his desire to establish a marijuana dispensary business, stating it was "no fun" obtaining the substance illegally. Scott Wilson, Concord, stated that he represented all the people who could not be at the meeting, and expressed his opinion favoring medical marijuana dispensaries in Concord. Michael Snow, resident, urged the Council to adopt Ordinance 05-9 prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries in Concord. 3 City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes September 27, 2005 Kirk Shelby and Gary Wheeler, business owners, shared the problems they have experienced with traffic, trash and loitering because of the medical marijuana dispensary operating next to their place of business. Cary McReynolds, legal representative lor MariCare, a medical marijuana dispensary operating in Concord, stated that his client was taking steps to abate the tralfic and trash issues at their place of operation and asked the Council to reconsider action on the item. Councilmember Shinn stated that Mayor Hoffmeister had appointed an Ad Hoc Committee consisting of himself and herself to review the matter. He advised that the committee had met with local professionals on Monday, September 26, 2005, and stated that he concluded that there was no significant practice on the part of medical professionals to use marijuana for pain and that medicai professionals are not prepared to embrace medical marijuana. He further stated that he had periodically monitored the operations of MariCare and had witnessed the same negative . impacts as had been described. Councilmember Peterson stated that it is his opinion, based upon various reports that he had reviewed, that the use of marijuanais more hazardous to your health than the illness or condition that patients are trying to treat. Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Peterson to adopt Ordinance 05-9 entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 18, (BUSINESS AND BUStNESS REGULATIONS), BY ADDING ARTICLE XI (MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES), PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE CITY OF CONCORO." Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peterson; Shinn, Bonilla ABSENT: Hoffmeister NOES: None" LEASE AGREEMENT WITH D1ANDA ENTERPRISES. L.P. - Police Deoartment Vallev District Office This item was pulled by Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky who stated he would like to see the monthly lease fee shown in the agenda description and recommended a recycling opportunity be added at the Dianda Plaza Shopping Center. Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to approve a lease agreement with Dianda Enterprises, L.P. for relocation of the Police Department Valley District Offiee to Dianda Plaza Shopping Center at 4467 Clayton Road; and to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: . AYES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla ABSENT: Hoffmeister NOES: None ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS - Galindo House Paintino. Proiect No. 1752.1 This item was pulled by Councilmember Peterson to confirm the total cost of the project. Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to accept the improvement for Project No., 1752.1, Galindo House Painting; constructed by River City Painting, Inc. of Sacramento; and to direct the City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister 4 I I I I I I City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 27, 2005 FEDERAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT - Familv Violence-Victim Advocate oosition This item was pulled by Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky who opined the agenda item was incompletely stated. Motion was made by Alien and seconded by Shinn to approve the acceptance of a Federal Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in the amount of $51,000 to partially fund the Police Department's Family Violence-Vietim Advocate position; to appropriate the acceptance; and to authorize the City Manager to "xecute the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council: AYES: Alien, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None. ABSENT: Hoffmeister PUBLIC HEARING - Concord Boulevard Rezonino The notice of public hearing was published in the Contra Costa Times, mailed to affected parties, and posted in the Civic Center posting cabinet on September 16, 2005. Planning Manager Deborah Raines presented a report, referring to her memorandum dated September :!7, 2005, stating that property owners of three parcels of approximately 1.03-acre totat land area along the south side of Concord Boulevard and Farm Bureau Road applied to rezone their properties from Singie Family Residential (R-B and R-10) to Apartment and Professionai Office . (APO). She noted that the properties were developed with office uses prior to annexation into the City in 1967, that with adoption of the General Pian in 1995, the three properties were designated Community Office, and ratained the original R-a and R-10 zoning. She went on to say that this limits repairs" remodeling and expansion that the property owners may undertake for the existing offices. She concluded that Planning Commission had considered the applieation at a hearing on August 17, 2:005 and unanimously recommended Council approval for this rezone. The public hearing was opened and closed without comment. Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to introduce Ordinance 05-425.5 by reading of the title only and waiving further reading, entitled, "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AS FOLLOWS: CONCORD BOULEVARD REZONtNG (RZ 05-002) OF PARCELS t13-111-051, 113-111-063, AND 114-370-060, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3554, 3556, AND 3600 CONCORD BOULEVARD, FROM R.B AND R-10 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) TO APO (APARTMENT AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT)" The City Attorney read 1he ordinance title. Motion passed by the foliowing vote of the Couneil: A YES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister AGREEMENT WITH McDONOUGH. HOLLAND AND ALLEN PC - Redevelooment Area in the Iniand Portion of the Concord Naval Weapons Stations Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to approve an agreement with McDonough. Holland and Allen PC in the amount of $70,000 to provide legal services to the Concord Redevelopment Agency relating to the formation of a new redevelopment area in Ihe inland portion of the Concord Naval Weapons Station; and to authorize the Executive Director to exeeute the agreement. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council/Agency: A YES: Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None ABSENT: Hoffmeister 5 City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes September 27. 2005 PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment of November 2000 Disoosition and Develooment Aoreement (oDA) between the Concord Redevelopment Aoencv and Leoacv Partners 2273 LLC This item was continued by the City Attorney in a memorandum dated September 26, 2005, stating that the Cily Attorney's office was still working with the Legacy attorneys and that il was preferable to postpone hearing the item at this time. Seott Kronland, attorney representing Local UA 159, IBEW 302, and Sheet Metal Workers 104, addressed the Council and stated the Unions were opposed to amending the DDA which, in his opinion, would benefit Legacy Partners. He went on to state that the Legacy project was a pUblic work, and that while the Redevelopment Agency did not require Legacy to comply with labor laws, because Legacy did not require Union waging It has resulted in tegal problems. He urged the Council not to amend the DDA, which, in his opinion, might subject the City to liabilities. Gram Hodess, Business Manager for Plumbers/Steamfitters Loeal 159, who. had 302 sheetmetel workers on the project, and resident Ed Strelo, urged the Council not to adopt the amendment.to the DDA. After discussion, the Council requested the item be continued to a Closed Session, and stated that the matter would be renoticed for a future Council meeting, if one were required and could not be rescheduled within 30 days. The Council recessed at 7:58 p.m. and reconvened at 8:10 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING - One-Time Emerdencv Mobilehome Rental Assistance Prooram for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodoes Housing Manager Amy Hodgett presented a report, referring her memorandum dated September 27, 2005, regarding the feasibility of providing Emergency Rental Assistance for those residents of Adobe and Diablo Mobile Lodges who might be ina position of losing their homes as a result of the imposition of the retroactive rent increase payments ordered by the Mobile Homes Rent Review Board and a recent basic rental inereases imposed by the landlord. She advised that. the matter had been reviewed by the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development and that the recommended Emergency Rental Assistance alternatives were loans that would place a lien against the mobilehome units and would be paid off when the mobilehome was sold. The program, she stated, is designed to target one-time assistance which would cease at the end of a proposed one or five-year program. She also stated that there were three levels of threshold eligibility proposed; at 50% of Area Median Income, at 30% of Area Median Income, and eligibility limited to households who moved into either of the mobilehome parks since 1994. She emphasized that the assistance would be available only at the Adob.e and Diablo parks. Following cqmments by the Councilmembers and ctariflcatlon of questions eonceming the proposed program alternatives, the public hearing was opened. Jeanae D. Hope and Chuck Carpenter, residents, urged the Council to approve the 50% of Area Median Income threshold eligibility option with a one-time payment. Charlotte Taliaferro, resident, expressed her concern that the landlord may not accept the paymen' and asked who prepared the calculations defining what each tenant owed. City Attorney Labadie explained that the figures were prepared by the park owner. The publie.hearing was closed. Following discussion, motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to approve an Emergency Rental Assistance Program for Adobe and Diablo Mobile Lodges with an eligibility threshotd set at 50% of Area Median Income, consisting of a one-time payoff, and to authorize a 6 I I I City Couneil/Redevelopment Agency Mlnute~ . September 27, 2005 I budget transfer of $200,000 from Project No. 1168 and other changes specified in the Ten-Yea'" Plan. Motion passed by the following vote of the Council; . AYES: . Allen, Peterson, Shinn, Bonilla NOES: None. ABSENT: Hoffmeister JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS CORRESPONDENCE I f. g. h. i. j. k. I. m. a. Treasurer's Report for the month of July, 2005. b. Memo dated September 27, 2005 removing item 3.1 from the Consent Calendar. c. Me,mo dated September 26, 2005 removing item 6.a from the agenda. d. Paul Broadman's September 27, 2005 telephoned comments concerning medical marijuana dispensaries. e. Benched comments. regarding the Concord Boutevard Rezoning from: - Ronald J., Marilou C., and Charles R. Stewart received Sept. 26, 2005 - Barbara Catdera received Sept. 25, 2005 . - Mark Caldera received Sept. 25, 2005 -Leslie Finerty received Sept. 25, 2005. Photographs submitted by Gary Wheeler of activities near MarlCare business. Sept. 14; 2005 letter from Ellen Hague regarding medical marijuana business. Sept. 9, 2005 letter from Charles Martin regarding medical marijuana. .... .~J.~~'.' Sept. 16, 2005 telephone message: from Stephen Driscoll regarding MariCare, . . Sept. 5, 2005 submittal by Dr. FredVon Stleff entitted "Marijuana Abuse". Sept. 8, 2005 letter to Mayor Hoffmeister from Dr. Fred J. Von Stleff expressing his professional opinions about marijuana use Sept. 6. 2005 Internet citing entitled "Medical Marijuana: An Overview" Article entitled "Cocatne-Retated Environmental Cues Elictt Physiological Stress Responses" COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS Councilmember Peterson referred to the recent article In the Contra. Costa Times concerning the revitalization of Coneord's downtown area. I Councilmember Allen announced the success of this year's Symphony in the Park Coneert. Councilmember Shinn advised that there was a 4-day Emergency Preparedness Class being held and stated that he and several of the City's staff were attending. 7 City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes September 27,2005 By order of the chair, the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m. I APPROVED: ...')-il-;Y~A&n",~~ ~ '-.'SUSAN BONILLA' N1A K PETERSON VICE MA YOR/AGENCYMEMBER COUNCtLMEMBER/AGENCY CHAtR I I 8 ANNOTATED AGENDA REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE CONCORD CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY --- Tuesday, September 27, 2005 . . llll" "" iit~~ 6:30 p.m. - Council Chamber ]950 Parkside Drive 6:30 p.m. - Council Chamber ROLL CALL - Mayor Hoffmeister absent PLEDGE TO THE FLAG - Councilmember Allen PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Phillip Arndt, employee of Comcast and Chair of the Chamber of Commeree, llIUlouneed Comeast's upcoming "Comeast Cares Day" scheduled for Saturday, October 1,2005 at the Mt. Diablo High School from 8:30 a.m. - 3 :00 p.m, He explained that this llIUlual event allows the . Comeast employees to partner with high school students, teachers, and administrators to do landscaping, painting, and other light maintenance, and invited the Council to attend. He also llIUlounced that the Coneord Greater Chamber of Commerce had recently-hired new President and CEO,Keith MeMann, a Concord resident, who will begin his duties on October ]7,2005. 1. PRESENTATION.,.. of Concord Business Recognition Awards to JCM Partners, Engineering Remediation Resource Group, and CoIieord Hyundai. Report from Dwayne Dalman, Redevelopment Specialist. ACTION: Vice Mayor Bonilla, with the assistance of Councilmembers Peterson and Allen, presented the recognition awards. City CouneilJRedevelopmentAgency Agenda September 27, 2005 2. ANNOUNCEMENTS a. Announcing- an opening for Concord's representative on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Citizens' Advisory Committee for a two-tenn ending January 31, 2008, and establishing Friday, December 2, 2005 as the deadline for reeeipt of appiications. Report from Mayor Hoffineister. ACTION: Vice Mayor Bonilla announced the opening on the Contra Costa Transportation Authority Citizens' Advisory Committee and advised Friday, Deeember 2, 2005 as the deadline for receipt of applications. CITY COUNCIL MATTERS 3. CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR a. Adopt Ordinance 05-8 - Amendment to the Concord Municipal Code by adopting the 2004 California Electrical Code, Title 24 - amending Chapter 14, Artiele VII, Seetion 14-18] and deleting sections 14-183 and 14-184 of the Concord Municipal Code. Ordinance was introduced on September 6, 2005. ACTION: Ordinance 05-8 adopted. (4-0-1, Hoffmeister absent) b. Adopt Ordinance05~9 - Amendment to Concord Municipal Code- Prohibition of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries - amending Chapter 18 (Business and Business Regulations) by adding Article XI (Medieal Marijuana Dispensaries) prohibiting the establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries within the City of Concord. . Otdinanee was introduced on September 6, 2005. ACTION: Ordinance 05-9 adopted. (4-0-1, Hoffmeister absent) e. Approving - a lease agreement with Dianda Enterprises, L,P. for relocation of the Police Department Valley District Office to Dianda Plaza Shopping Center at 4467 Clayton Road, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Recommended by Chief of Police. ACTION: Lease Agreement approved; City Manager authorized to eJl:ecute it. 2 City Council/Redevelopment Ageney Agenda September 27,2005 d. AcceptiJig - improvements forProjeet No, 1752.1, Galindo House Painting, constructed by River City Painting, Inc. of Sacramento; and directing the City Clerk to file the Notiee of Completion. Recommended by the Director of Public Works - Engineering Services. ACTION: Improvements accepted; City Clerk to me the Notice of Completion. I e. Approving - the Firial Map for Tract 7919, Skyler Estates Residential Subdivision, Assessor's Parcel Nwnber 120-121-028; approving the Subdivision Agreement; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Resolution 05.63 for adoption. Recommended by the Director of Public Works- Engineering Services. . ACTION: Resolution 05-63 adopted, approving Subdivision Agreement and Final Map for Tract 7919, Skyler Estates Residential Subdivision, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. f. Accepting - the public improvements construeted for Traet 8437, Monteeito Subdivision, including drainage facilities; sewer facilities, street widening, and other improvements required for the development of 183 single family residential lots; and releasing the obligation of the bonds posted with the Subdivision Agreement. Resolution 05-66 for adoption. Recommended by Director of Pub lie Works - Engineering Services. ACTION: Resolution 05-66 adopted aecepting the improvements for Tract 8437, Montecito Subdivision, and releasing the obligation of tbe bonds posted with the Subdivision Agreement. g. Approving - the Final Map for Tract 8759, Silverleaf Residential Subdivision, Assessor's Parcel Nos. 116-070-006 and 1 ]6-203-006; approving tbe Subdivision Agreement; aild authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Resolution 05-64 for adoption. Recommended by Director of Public Works...; Engineering Services, ACTION: Resolution 05-64 adopted, approving Subdivision Agreement and Final Map for Tract 8759, SUverleafResidential Subdivision. 3 City Council/RedevelopmentAgeney Agenda September 27, 2005 h. . Approving - the Final Map for Tract 8815, Centre Pointe Subdivision, Assessor's Parcel Nos. 113-241-061, -063, -065, -066, and -079; approving the Subdivision Agreement; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Resolution 05-62 for adoption. Recommended by Direetor of Public Works - Engineering SerVices. ACTION: Resolution 05-62 adopted, approving the Subdivision Agreement and Final Map for Tract 8815, Centre Pointe Subdivision, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. i. Approving - the Final Map for Tract 8872, Vista Kellyoaks Subdivision, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 134-032-012, 134-051-023, and -024; approving the SubdiVision Agreement; and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Resolution 05-65 for adoption. Recommended by Director of Public Works - Engineering Services. . ACTION: This item was removed from the Consent Calendar. j. Accepting - improvements for the 2005 Slurry Seal Program, RFQ #2008, constructed by Bond Blacktop, Ine., and directing the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. Recommended by the Director of Pub lie Works - Maintenance Services. ACTION: Improvement accepted; City Clerk to file the Notice of Completion. k. Matter to be set for Public Hearing on October 11, 2005 - Seren Innovations, Inc. - to review a request by Seren Innovations, me. to transfer its eable television franchise for the cable television system it operates in Concord, California to Astound Broadband, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of WaveDivision Holdings, LLC of Kirkland, Washington. For further infonnation contaet (925) 671-3085. Recommended by Director of City Management. ACTION: Public Hearing set for Tuesday, October 11, 2005. 4 City Council/RedevelopmentAgency Agenda September 27, 2005 I. Approving - the acceptance and appropriate the aceeptance of a Federal Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) in the amount of$51,000 to partially fund the Police Department's Family Violenee- Victim Advocate position and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement. Recommended by the Chief of Police. ACTION: Federal Justice Assistance Grant accepted and appropriated; City Manager authorized to execute the Grant. 4. CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING a. Concord Boulevard Rezoning - consideration of an application to rezone three parcels, 3554, 3556, and 3600 Concord Boulevard, from Single Family Residential to Apartment and Professional Offici: District. Assessor Pareel Nos. 113-11 ]-051, 113-11 ]-063, and 114-370-060. Approval recommended by the Planning Commission. Report from Planning Manager, Deborah Raines. ACTION: Ordinance 05-425.5 introduced by reading of the title only and waiving further reading. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS 5. JOINT CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSENT CALENDAR. a, Approving - an agreement with McDonough, Holland and.A1len PC in the amount of $70,000 to provide legal services to the Concord Redevelopment Agency relating to the fonnation of a new redevelopment area in the inland portion of the Concord Naval Weapons Stations and authorizing the Exeeutive Director to execute the agreement. Recommended by Director of Planning and Economic Development. ACTION: Agreement approved; Executive Director authorized to execute it. 5 City CouneillRedcvelopment Agency Agenda September 27, 2005 6. JOINT CITY COUNCILIREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARINGS: MAYOR: Madam Clerk, have aU the publications been completed and appropriate parties notified? . . . a. Amendment of November 2000 Disposition and Deveiopment Agreement between the Concord Redeve]opment Agency and Legacy Partners 2273 LLC - to add a provision eliminating the tax increment rebate if the project converted to condominiums, and to remove provisions that provide for deferred participation payments to the Agency. City Couneil Resolution 05-71 and Redevelopment Ageney Resolution 05-677 for adoption. Report by Director of PI arming and Economic Development. ACTION: Item referred back to Closed Session. b. One-Time Emergeney Mobilehome Rental Assistance Program for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodges - authorizing the establishment of a one-time Emergency Mobilehome Rental Assistanee Program by transferring funds from . Capital ImprovementProjeet No. P-1168, Affordable Housing Infrastructure, to Emergency Mobilehome Rental Assistance for Adobe and Diablo Mobilehome Lodges, a new project, and amending the Redevelopment Agency Housing Set-Aside 2005-06 Budget and ] 0- Y ear Plan. Recommended by the Council Committee on Housing and Economic Development. Report by Housing Manager Amy Hodgett; ACTION: Emergency RentalAssistance Program forAdobe and Diablo Mobile Lodges approved with an eligibility threshold set at 50% of Area Median Income, consisting of a one-time payoff, and authorizing a budget transfer of $200,000 from Project No. 1168~ 7. CORRESPONDENCE ' a. Treasurer's Report for the month of July, 2005. b. Memo dated September 27,2005 removing item 3.i from the Consent Calendar. c. Memo dated September 26, 2005 removing item 6.a from the agenda. d. Paul Broadman's September 27,2005 telephoned eomments concerning medical marijuana dispensaries. 6 City Council/Redevelopment Ageney Agenda September 27, 200S . e. Benehed comments regarding the Concord Boulevard Rezoning from: - Ronald J., Mariloil C., and Charles R. Steward received Sept. 26, 2005 - Barbara Caldera received. Sept. 25, 2005 - Mark Caldera received Sept. 25, 2005 - Leslie Finerty reeeived Sept. 2S, 200S f. . Photographs submitted by Gary Wheeler of activities near MariCare business. g, Sept. ]4,200S letter from Ellen Hague regarding medical marijuana business. h. Sept. 9, 200S letter from Charles Martin regarding medieal marijuana. i. Sept. 16, 2005 telephone message from Stephen Driscoll regarding MariCare. j. Sept. S, 2005 submittal by Dr. Fred Von Stieff entitled "Marijuana Abuse". k, Sept. 8, 2005 letter to MayorHoffmeister from Dr. Fred J. Yon Stieff expressing his professional opinions about marijuana use I. Sept. 6, 2005 Internet citing entitled "Medical Marijuana: An Overview" m. Article entitled "Cocaine~Related Envirorunental Cues Elicit PhySiological Stress Responses" 8. CLOSED SESSION REPORTS - None 9. COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS Couneilmember Peterson referred to the reeent artiele. in the Contra Costa Times concerning the revitalization of Concord's downtown area. Couneilmember Allen announced the suceess of this year's Symphony in the Park COIicert. Couneilmember Shinn advised that there was a 4-day Emergency Preparedness Class being held and stated that he and several of the City's staff were attending. 10. ADJOURNMENT at 8:50 p.m. 7 City Council/Redevelopment Agency Agenda September 27, 2005 NOTICE There is a 9o-day limit for the filing of a challenge in the Snperior Court to certain City administrative decisions and orders which require a hearing by law, the receipt of evidence, and the exercise of discretion. The 90-day limit begins on the date the decision is final (Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6). Further, if you challenge an action taken by the City Council in court, you may be limited, by California law, including but notlimiled to Government Code Section 65009, to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in the publie hearing, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council prior to or at the public hearing. The City Council may be requested to reconsider a decision if the request is made prior to the next City Council meeting, regardless of whether it is a regular or special meeting (policy and Procedure No.2, Section 4.24). For information on the next reguiar or special City Council meeting, pieaSe call (925) 671-3495. . NEXT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING: Tuesday, October 4, 2005 MEETING RECORDS Audio cassette tapes' and videotapes of most City Council meetings -are available for listening or viewing at the City . Clerk's office. Copies of the videotapes may be purchased. Contact the Conununity Relations Manager at (925) 671-3272 for further information. 8 Page I of J Du Borg, Lydia From: Dennis Packer [packer@altrionel.com] Sent: Wednesday. September 07, 2005 9:59 PM . To: cityeouncil@ei.concord.ea.us Subject: ATTN Councilman Peterson I read with interest your feelings regarding whether your city council should allow medical marijuana dispensaries in your city. I may be able to sh.ed some light on the subject of medical marijuana dispensaries for you....What woutd you say if one single medieal marijuana dispensary grossed $71,000 a day and that does not include credit card sales? One of the reasons a robberies occur at these facilities, like the one in San Leandro a couple of weaks ago, is the. fact crooks are aware of tha profitability of medical marijuana. In addition, don't lat anyone fool you, anybody ean seore marijuana at thase places. I briefed.the Los Angeles County counsel as they studied the. same questions you are pondering. \canned ATIACHMENI' 7 09113/200S RECE~!ED "Its against the law, We might /lot like the law. But it's against the law. Mark Peterson SEP ! 3 Z005 CITY MGR'S. OFFICE !?t'. , i~Jo) UF,I . ~l6j~;'}' The federal government has long opposed the legalization of marijuana for medical use. The federal government continues to list marijuana as a schedule I drug." Unsafe, highly subjected to abuse and has no possible medical value, (Now is that value for the government or use for the patient?) The federal government has excepted the legalization of Marino I for medical use and in so dropping the drug to a schedule'H drug and its being sold today by the Solvay Pharmaceutical company and at a cost that most people cant afford: The main drug in marinol isTHC; the only drug in marijuana is THe. In 1972" President Nixon National Commission on Marijuana and drug abuse" after years of research, that there is little proven danger of physical or psychological hann in the experimental or intennittent use of natural marijuana. For the above reasons I/we are hoping that we can count on your vote to keep Maricare Medical Marijuana providers open for legal patients. Tha~'~~ ~ _/ '~~4'~~- O~~yb~- ~\~s mC\r~~f\ d.-30l ~.efJu.()\.'c~ \), AV\~~ocJ\\ m\~C ~Y.'509 Concord Police Department Memotandum David 0, Livingston, Chief of Police RECEIVED SEP 1 5 ZOGS September 15, 2005 To: From: Subject: Attached you will find an article by Karen Tandy, The Administrator of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, (DEA). This article was published in the official magazine of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, The Police ChIef, in the March, 2005 issue, The article sets out the view of the DEA and other Federal Agencies that marijuana is. not medicine. Although I understand the issue before Council Is not the validity of "medicinal" marijuana, I thought the article would nonetheless provide some context and might be helpful as you deliberate this issue now before you. Obviously others may have different views from those set out by the DEA. However, the information contained In the article is fully supported as evidenced by the exhaustive footnotes. It does provide somewhat of a balancing perspective. Thank you. cc, j Lydia Du Borg, City Manager Craig Labadie, City Attorney ATIAGHMENr 5 . ... VII"'''' '-"U"'l LY.lU5u,,",IU,", ~ , . u~n"....... . "Q'. - - - . r;;;;di~-;;-r~d -1S5"'~ L____._.___._.... . leo From The Administrator .. ~Oc'U,.f Marijuana: The Myths Are Killing Us . ~ ~ "'on on · '" By Karen P. Tandy, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, .s~ .ft. Washlnglon, D.C., and Chair, IACPNareotics and Dangerous Drugs Committee Karen P. Tandy" Admlnistralor,U.S. Drug Enforcement Adminjslralion Irma Perez died from taking ecstasy; but compounding Ihat tragedy was the deadly decision 10 use marijuana to "treat" her Instead of making what could have been a lifesaving. call to 911. Irma was a victim ~f our society's stunning misinformation about marijuana.a society that has come 10 believe Ihalmarljuana use is not only an individual's free choice but also Is good medicine, a cure.all for a variety of ills. A recent poll showed that neariy three-fourths of Americans over the age of 45 support legalizing marijuana for medical use.3 . ....~......"'.,.,'...".'w . .. . ',:,!~:..\\'.. ..:: hen 14-year-old Irma Perez of Belmont, . .' ::.. California, took a single ecstasy pill one . :..:'. . , evening last April, she had no idea she would .. . become one of the 26,000 peopte who die every . year from drugs.' Irma took ecstasy wllh two of her 14-year-old friends in her home. Soon efter taking the tiny blue pill, .Irma complained of feeling awful .. and said she felt like she was "going to die: Instea.d of seeking medical care, her friends calied the 17. year-old dealer who supplied the pills and asked for .advlce. The friendinried to get Irma to smoke marijuana, but when she couldn't because she was vomillng and lapsing Into a coma, they stuffed . marijuana leaves Into har mouth because, according to news sources, "Ihey knew that drug Is somellmes used to treat cancer patients,-2 o{~--. .....,. "'q;" o{~ ~. '\:>rQ' Clo~ , Ooq,.. . 'v'% ." .1I's a belief that has fillered down 10 many of our teens, If what t'm hearing during my visits wilh middle school and high school students across the country Is true, I'm amazed at how well versed In drug legalization these teens are. It Is as If legalization advocates stood outside their schools handing out their leanets 01 lies. Here Is what students have told me about marijuana: "Irs natural because it grows In the ground, so II must be good for you: "II must be medicine, because it makes me feet beller: "Since everybody says It's medicine, It is." . . legaliZation advocates themselves have alluded to the facl that so-called medical marijuana Is a way of achieving wholesale drug legalization. A rew years ago, the New York Times interviewed Elhan Nadelmann, director of the lindesmilh Center, a drug pOlicy research .center. Responding to criticism that the so-called medical marijuana Issue is a stalking horse for drug legalization, Mr. Nadelma'nn did not disagree. "Will it help lead toward marijuana legalization?" he asked. "' hope SO:4 . The issue of martJuana as medicine has captured lhe nation's allentlon and has now made its way to the U, S. Supreme Court, with Ashcron v. Ratch stlil pendlng.S The natural extension of this myth Is that, if marijuana Is medicine, It must also be safe http://www.policechiefmagazine.org/mngazine/index.cfl11?fuseacti~n=prinl_ di sp 1 ay &a rti c [... 9/ IS/2 00 S rUllC"'-'lllcllVluga:GIllC' w /'\,flICle rageL 011 lor recreallonal use. This pervasive mindsel has even reached our courts. .tn January 2005, for example, Governor Frank Murkowskl of Alaska had to ask Ihe I.egislalure "to overrule a court ruling thai adult Alaskans have the right 10 possess man]uana for personal use In their homes."6 There was no pretense of medical use in this ruling; II gave Alaskans the legsl right to smoke marijuana ror any reason. lending credence 10 the belief Ihat marijuana is nol only safe to treal serious IItness bul somehow sare for general use and ror all society. . Whal is Ihe antidote? Spreading Ihe truth. As a prominenl spokesperson in your communily, you have the opportunity and, I would argue, the responsibility 10 Inrorm your neighbors. America is nol sufferinglrom anything lhatthe truth can't cure. To help you set the record stratght, Ihis article seeks to rebulthe rhetoric and recap the reality. Myth: Marijuana Is medicine. .Reallty: Smoked marijuana is not medicine. . The scienllfic and medical communities have determined that smoked marijuana Is a . health danger, not a cure. There is no medlcat evidence lhal smoking marijuana' helps pallents. In ract, Ihe Food and Drug Administration (FOA) has approved no medications that are smoked, primarily because smoking Is a poor way to-deliver medicine, Morphine, for example has proven 10 be a medically vatuable drug, but the FDA does not endorse smoking opium or heroin. Congress enacted laws against marijuana In 1970 based In part on lis conciusion that madjuana has no scientifically proven medical value, which the U.S. Supreme Court affifl)led more Ihan 30 years later in Uniled States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, el aI., 532 U.S. 4B3 (2001). Marijuana remains in schedule 1 or the Controlled Substances Acl because II has a high pOlential for abuse, a lack of accepled safety for use under medical supervision, and no currently accepted medical value.7 The American Medical Associ~1I0n has rejected pleas 10 endorse marijuana as medicine, and Instead urged thai marijuana remain a prohiblled schedule 1 drug at teasl untillhe results of controlled studies are in,S The National M~llIple Sclerosis Society slated that sludies done to date "have not provided convincing evidence Ihal marijuana benefils,people with MS" and does nol r~commend n as a Ireatment.9 Further, Ihe MS Society states thai for people with MS "lon9-lerm use of marijuana ma.y be associated with si9njfjcan~ serious side effecls,-10 The Brillsh Medical Association has taken a similar poslllon, voicing "extreme concem" that downgrading the criminal status of marijuana would 'mislead" the public into thinking Ihalthe drug is safe 10 use when, "In fact, it has been linked to greater risk of heart disease, lung cancer, bronchitis, and emphysema."l1 In 1999 the Instilule of Medicine (10M) undertook a landmark study reviewing the alleged medical properties of marijuana. Advocates of so-catled medical marijuana . frequenlly toutlhis study, but the study's findings decisively undercut their ar9uments. In truth, Ihe 10M expliCitly found that marijuana Is not medicine and expressed concem aboul palients' smoking it because smoking Isa harmful drug- delivery system. The 10M further found Ihatthere was no scientific evidence that smoked marijuana had medical value, -even for the chronically ill, and concluded that "there is lillle fulure In smoked marijuana as a medlcatly approved medicalion."12 In facl. the researchers. who conducled Ihe sludy could find no medical value to . marijuana for virtually any ailment they examined, .Including ihe treatment of wasting syndrome in AIDS patients, movemenl disorders such .as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy, or glaucoma. The 10M found that THC'. (Ihe primary psychoactive ingredient in marijuana, in . smoked marijuana provides only temporary reliel from intraocular pressure (tOP) associaled with glauc;oma and would have 10 be smoked el9htto 10 limes a day to achieve consistent results. And there exists another Ireatment for lOP, as the hit p:llwlVlV.po I icech ie fmagazi Ill'. orglmagazine/index.cfm? fuseaction=print _ d isp la y &artic I:.. 9/1512005 rUl1C~ \.,mer lVIagazme - v AmCle Page 3 of7 availability of medically approved once- or twice.a-day eye drops makes lOP control a realilyfor many patients and provides round-the-clock lOP reduction.'4 For tWo other conditions. nausea and pain, the report' recommended against marijuana use, while suggesting further research in timited circumstances for THC but not smoked marijuana. 15 Before any drug can be marketed in the United States, II must undergo rigorous' scientific scruUny and clinical evaluation overseen by the FDA. For example, the FDA has approved Marinol (dronabinol)-a safe capsule form of synthetic THC that meets the standard of accepted medictne and has the same properties as culllvated marijuana without the high-: (or the treatment of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy and for the treatment of wasting syndrome in AIDS paUents. The federal government has approved and continues to approve research into the possible use of marijuana as medicine and any new delivery systems of marijuana's active ingredients. To quote U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer's remarks during lhe November 2004 Raich oral argument, "'Medicine by regulation is better than medicine by referendum."'6 Proving that the regulatory process does work, DEA has regislered every researcher who meets FDA standards to use marijuana in scienllfic studies. Since 2000, for example, the Californla.based Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research (CMCR) has gained approval for 14 trials using smoked marijuana in human beings and three trials in laboratory and animal modeis.ll This CMCR research is the first effort to study the medical efficacy of marijuana. But researchers have not endorsed smoking marijuana and instead are attempllng to isolate marijuana's acllve Ingrediilnts to develop altemalive delivery systems to smoking.'6 Not one of these researchers has found scientific proof that smoked marijuana is mediCine.'. Myth: Legalization of marijuana In other countries has been a success. Reality: Liberalization of drug laws In other countries has often resuUed In higher use of dangerous drugs, Over the past decade, drug policy In some foreign countries, particularly Ihose In Europe. has gone through some dramatic cha-nges toward greater liberalization with . failed results. Consider the experience of the Nethertands, where the government reconsidered ils legal/zation measures In Iighl of thai country's experlence. Mer marljuana use became legal, consumption nearly tripled among 18.10 20-year-olds. As awareness of the harm of marijuana grew, Ihe number Of cannabis coffeehouses in the Ne.lherlands decreased 36 percent in six years. Almost aI/ Dutch lowns have a cannabis policy, and 73 percent of them have a no-tolerance pol/cy toward the corteehouses.20 In 1987 Swiss officials permitted drug use and sales In a Zurich park, which was soon dubbed Needte Park, and Switzerland became a magnet for drug users the world over. Within five years, Ihe number of regular drug users at the park had reportedly swelied from a few hundred to 20,000. The area around the park. became crime-ridden to the point that the parK had to be shut down and the experiment terminated.21 Marijuana use by Canadian teenagers is at a 25-year peak in Ihe wake of an aggressive decriminalization movement. Atlhe very lime a decriminalization bill was before the House or Commons, the Canadian government released a report showing that marijuana smoking among teens Is "at levels that we haven't Seen since the late '70s when rales reached their peak."22 After a large decline In the 1980s, marijuana use.among teens increased during the 1990s, as young people apparentty became "confused aboul the state of federal pot laws. "2' Myth: MarijUana Is harmless. Realily: Marijuana Is dangerous 10 the user. h IIp:llwww.policechiefmagazine.orglmagnzineli ndex. cfm?fuscaction=prin t_ d ispl ny &articI.~, 9/15/2 005 J. VII\.c; ""we! LVU1~aL.IJJI: -" 'W MUCH:: Page 4 of7 Use of marijuana has adverse heaUh, safety, social, academic, economic, and behavioral consequences; and children are the most vulnerable to Us damaging effects. Marijuana Is the most widely used illicit drug In America24 and Is readily. available to klds.25 Compounding the problem Is that the marijuana of today is not the man]uana of the baby boomers 30 years ago. Average THC levels rose from less than 1 percent in"the mld-1970s 10 more than S percent in 2004.26 And the potency . of B.C. Bud,a poputar type of marijuana cultivated In British Columbia, Canada, Is roughly twice the national average.ranging from 15 percent THe content to 20 percent or even hlgher.27 . Marijuana use can lead to dependence and abuse. Marijuana was the second most common illicit drug responsible for drug treatment admissions in 2002- outdistancing crack cocaine, the next most prevalant cause.28 Shocking 10 many Is that more teens are In treatment each year for marijuana dependence than for alcohot and all other illegal drugs comblned.29 This Is a irend that has been Increasing for more than a decade: In 2002, 64 percent of adolescenltreatment admissions reported marijuana as their primary substance of abuse, compared 1023 percenUn 1992.30 Marijuana is a gateway drug. In drug law enforcement. rarely do we meet heroin or cocaine addicts who did not start their drug use with marijuana. Scientific studies bear out our anecdotal findings, For example, the Journal of the American Medical Associallon reported, based on a study of 300 sets of twins, that marijuana-uslng twins were four times more likely than their siblings to use cocaine and crack cocaine, and five limes more likely to use hallucinogens such as LSD.3' Furthermore, the younger a person is when he or she first uses marijuana. the more . likely that person is to uSe cocaine and heroin and become drug-dependent as an adull. One study found that 62 percent of the adulls who first tried marijuana before Ihey were 15 were likely 10 go on to use cocaine. In contrast, only 1 percent or less . of adulls who never tried marijuana used heroin or cocaine.32 Smoktng marIjuana can cause significant health problems. Marijuana eon.tains more than 400 chemicals, of which 60 are cannablnoids.33 Smoking a marijuana cigarette deposits about three to five Urnes more tar Into the lungs than one filtered tobacco cigarelle.34 Consequently, regular marijuana smokers suffer from many of the. same health pro~lems as tobacco smokers, su.ch as chronic coughing and wheezing, chest colds, and chronic bronchitis.3S In fact, studies show that smoking three to four Joints per day causes at least as much harm to the respiratory system as smoking a full pack of clgarelles every day.3SMariJuana smoke also conlains 50 to 70 percent more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke'and produces high levels of an en2}'me that converts certain hydrocarbons Into malignant cells.37 tn addition, smoking marijuana can lead to Increase~ anxiety, panic allacks, depression, social wiihdrawal, and other mental heallh problems, particularly for teens.38 Research shows that kids aged 12 to 17 who smoke marijuana weekly are three Urnes more likely than nonusers to have.sulcidalthoughts.39 Marijuana use also can cause cognitive Impairment, to include such short.term effects as distorted perception, memory loss, and trouble with thinking and probiem solving. Students with an average grade of 0 or below were found to be more than four Urnes as likely to have used marijuana In the past year as youths who reported an average grade of A.4o For young people, whose brains are still developing, these effects are particularly problematic and jeopardize their ability to achieve theIr full potenUal." Myth: Smoking marijuana ha.rms only the smokers. Reality:" Marijuana use harms nonusers. We need to put to rest the thought that there Is such a thing as a lone drug user, a person whose habits affect only himself or herself. Drug use, inclUding marijuana use, Is not a vlcUmless crime. Some in your communiiles may resist involvement because they think someone else's drug use Is nolhurting them. But this kind of not-. hit P :llwww.policechiefmagazine.org/magazinelindex.cflll?fuseactionC.prin 1_ di sp I a y&a rtj cr.... 9/ IS/2 00 S ~ VII,",,,,,, \".1.:11\,,,4 lndOd.GII1C - 'W 1\HICJt: Page 5 of7 my.problem thinking Is tragically misguided. Ask those same people about . secondhand smoke from cigarettes, and they'll quickly acknowledge the harm that befalls nonsmokers. Secondhand smoke Is a well.known problem, one that Americans are becoming more unwilling to bear. We need to apply the same common-sense thinking 10 the even more pernicious secondhand effects or drug use. Take for Instance the disastrous effects or marijuana smOking on driving. As the National Highway Traffic Sarety Administration (NHTSA) noled, 'Epidemiology data from. . . traffic arresls and fatalities Indicate that after alcohol, maiijuana is the most frequenlly detected psychoactive substance among driving populations:42 Marijuana causes drivers to experience decreased car handling performance. . increased reaction limes, distorted time and distance estimation, sleeplr)ess, impaired motor skills, and lack of concentration.43 Th~ exlent of the problem of marijuana.impaired driving is startling. One In six (or 600:,000) high school students drive under the Inlluence or marijuana, atmosl as many as drive under the lnlluence of alcohol, according to estimates released In Sedtember 2003 by the Office of National Orug Control Policy (ONOCp).44 A study . or motorists pulled over for reckless driving showed that, among those who were not imp~lred by alcohol, 45 percent tested posilive for marijuana.45 For those of you who palrol streets and highways, you know that the consequences of marijuana-impaired driving can be tragic. For example, four children and their van driver-nicknamed Smokey by the children for his regular marijuana smoking-died In April 2002 when a Tippy Toes Learning Academy van veered off a freeway and hit a concrete bridge abutment. He was found at the crash scene with marijuana in his pocket.46 . Some such drug-impaired drivers will be detected through the Drug Recognition . Expert program, which operates under the direction of the IACP and is supported by NHTSA.47 However, If we are to bolster cases against drugged drivers, greater protection for innocents on the road requires the development or affordable roadside drug deteclion tests, and some are in. the testing phase now. Secondhand smoke from marijuana kills other innocents as well. last year. two Philadelphia firefighters were killed when they responded to a residential fire stemming from an Indoor marijuana grow.48 In New York City, an elghl-year-old boy, Deasean Hill, was killed by a stray builet Just steps Irom his Brooklyn home aller a drug dealer sold a dime bag of marijuana on another dealer's turf.49 ." Chief: Help Spread the Truth about Marijuana Debunking these myths and arming our young people and their parents with the facts do work. We have proof. It came In the fonn or good news from the Monitoring the .Fulure survey that reveals that marijuana USe has dropped 36 percent among eighth graders since 1996, and modestly declined among 10th and 12th graders.50 II is no coincidence that while marijuana use declined, the proportion of students perceiving marijuana use as dangerous increased.51 "Quite possibly, the media campaign aimed at marijuana use that has been undertaken by ONOCP, In coilaboratlon with the Partnership for a Drug Free America, has been having its intended effect,' Universily 01 Michigan researcher Lloyd Johnston, the study's principal investigator, said.S2 Research also shows that parental disapproval can. prevent teen drug USe. Most young people (69 percent) reported that their parents strongly disapprove of their trying marijuana. Among these youths, only 5 percent had used marijuana in the past month.53 Spread the truth. Join with your.community leaders. Clear the smokescreen by educating the children, parents, leachers. physicians, and legislators In your . community berore the myths kfll any more Irma Perezes or Deasean Hflls. .. 1 Centers for Disease Control 31)d Prevention. -Deaths; Final Data for 2002," National Vital Slatistics, Repof1S. vol. 53. no.-5: 11. h ltp://www.policechiefl1lugazine.orglmagazine/indcx.efm? fuscaction=pri n t _ d isp lay &arti c I~.. 9/1 5/2005 rUIIl;t: ~1Il~1 magazme . W,Artlcle Page 6 00 2 Mallhew B. Stannard. -Ecstasy Victim Told Friends She Fell like She Was 'Going 10 Die,'"San Francisco Chronicle, May 4,2004. 3 Elizabeth Wolfe, -AARP Finds Support tor Medical Marijuana,. (Balon Rouge) Advocate, December 19, 2004, . . . 4 Christopher Wren, .Small but Forcerul Coamion Works 10 Counter U.S. War on Drugs,- New York TImes, January 2, 2000. 5 Ashcroftv. Ralch, elal., 3S2 F.3rd 1222 (91h Clr, 2003). cert. granted, June 26, 2004, No. 03-1454, 6 Sean Cockerham. -Governor Moves 10 Change Pol LIIW,. Anctuxagfl Dally News; January 22, 2005. . 721 U.S.C. 612(b)(1). 8 American Medical Association. Policy H.95.952 Medical Marijuana. ~ National Mulllpre Sclerosis Society Informalion Sourcebook, avanable al (www.nalionalmssociely.org/pdflsourceboolslmarijuana.Pdf). 10 National Multiple Sclerosis SocIely Information Sourcebook. 11 -Doctors' Fears al Cannabis Change: BBC News. January 21. 2004. 12 Institule or Medicine. "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing lhe Science Base" (1999): 159, 178. 130ella.g.lelrahydrocannabinol. 141nslitute 0' Medlcine,'''Marijuana and Medlclne": 173.177. 151nstilute of Medicine. "Marijuana and MedicIOli": chapter 4 and summary. A single narrow exceplion was the recommendation thai shor1-lerm use of smoked marijuana of less than six months should be I;onsldered under closely monilored and documented I;ondltions for potenllal use by terminal canCet and AIDS pallents. for whom it said the benefits might outweigh the harms of smoking marijuana. See page 179. 16 Ralch. supra, oral argumenl transcrlpl, 50.S1. 17 CMCR. National Advisol)' Council Conference Call, November 19, 2004. 18 CMCR Mission Slalemenl, available al (www.&I1l~!igi.d.edu'genir\!9lmL~n-hl!!!l. 19 OEA Office of Diversion Cootrol. 20 While House Office of National Drug Control Policy, "Whal Americans Need to Know about Marijuana: 10; Dutch Health, Welfare, and Sports Minist!)', report, Aprit 23; 2004; University of Tilburg (Netherlands), "Coffeeshops in the Nelherlands 2003: September 2004. 21 Roger Cohen, .Amid Growing Crime, Zurich Closes a Park" Reserved for Drug Addicts: New York limesj Februa!)' 11, 1992. 22 Janice Tibbells. "More Teens Gelling Sloned:Ollawa Citizen. October 29,2003. 23 Janice TIbbetts, .More Teens Getllng Sloned: , . 24 Of lhe nearly 20 million current illicit drug users, 14.6 million (aboul75 percent) are using marijuana. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Subslimce Abuse and Menial Health SeNlces Administration, 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Heallh (2004). 25 U.S. Departmenl of Health and Human SelVlces. Nalionallnslilules of Health, "Monitoring !he Fulure National Results on Ado!escent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings: NIH publicaUon 04.. 55062003, by L. D. Joh03lon, el al. (2004); 10. 26 While House Office of National Drug Control Polley, quarterly report (University of Mississippi Potency Monitoring Project), no. 87 fNovember 8, 2004): figure 1C and figure 2. 27 Drug Enforcement AdmlnlslraUon,(~,de~,90Y). . 28 V.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Menial Health Services AdmlniSlration, Qfflce of Applied Studies, Trealmanl Episode OalaSel, National Admissions to Subslance Abuse Treatment Services, 1992.2002: 39,Iable 3.1b. 119. 29 U.S, Department of Health and Human Services. Subsfance Abuse end ~ental Health Services Administration. Office of Applied S!udies,Tlealmenl EpiSOde Oata Sel. National AdmIssions to Substance Abuse TreatmeAt Services, 1992~2001: lable 5.1 a, table S.1b, 156.157. 30 U.S. Oepar1menl of Heallh and Human Servfces. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administralion," -Adolescent Treatment Admissions: 1992 and 2002," Drug and Alcohol Services fnfolmalionSystem (OASIS) Report (October IS, 2004). . 31 While House Office of Nalional Drug Control Policy, "What Americans Need 10 Know aboul Marijuana: 9. 32 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Menlal.HeaJlh Services Adl11inlstrallon, Iniliatlon of Marijuana Use: Trends, PaUetns and Implicalion~. by Joseph C. Gfroerer, el al. (July 2002): 62. . 33 Slalement by Nora D. VOlkow, M.D.. director of the Nationallnsl1tute on'Orug Abuse on . .Marijuana and Medicine: The Need for a Sl;lence-Based Approach" before the House Commfllee On Governmenl Reform, Subcommittee on .Crimina! Justice, Ort,l9 Policy. and Human Resources, U.S. House of Represenlalives, April 1, 2004. 34 T. C. Wu. et cd.. "Pulmonary Hazards or Smoking Marijuana as Compared with Tobacco: New England Journal of Medicine 318 (1988): 347-351; cited In While House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Marijuana Myths & Facts, 9. 35 Nationallnslilute on Drug Abuse. -mDA Info Facts: Marijuana- (MARCH 2005): 3. 36 D. P, Tashkfn, -Pulmonary Complications of Smoked Substance Abuse," Western Journal of Medicine 152 (no. 5) (1990): 525-530; clled In While House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Marijuana Mylhs & Facts, 9. 37 Natiooallnslitute on Drug Abuse, -NIOA Info Facts: Marijuana": 3. 38 J. S. Brook, et al., .The Effect 0' Early Marijuana Use on Later Anxlely and Depressive Symptoms: NY$ Psycholog!st (2001): 35-39: cited in While House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Marijuana Myths & Facls, 4. 39 J. Greenblall. - Adolescenl Self.Reported Behaviors and Their Association wllh Marijuana Use: . based ondala from SAMHSANallonal HousehOld Su.....eyon Drug Abuse, 1994.1996 (1998): cited in While H<luse Office of Nalional Drug Control Policy, Marijuana Myths & Facts, 4. . 40 U.s. Department of Health and Humall SelVlces, Substance Abuse and Menial Heallh Services Adminislration, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, "Marijuana Use among Youlh- (July 19, 2002): ciled in While House Office of National Orug Conlrol Policy. Marijuana Myths & Facts, 3. 41 While House Office of Nalional Drug Control Policy, Marijuana Myths &" Facts, 3-4. 42 U.S. Oepartment of Transportalion. National Highway Traffic Safely Administration, "Orugs and .' o. . " . c h Up ://www.policechiefmagnzine.org/nmgnzinefindex.cfm? fuseaction=prinl_ display &arti c I..: 9115/2005 . _n.._ -'--0-".- ., .&"."'......... Page 7 of? Human Performance Fact Sheets; by Fiona J. Couper and Bany K. Logan (March 2005). 43 U.S. Oepartmenl'of Transportalioo, Nalional Highway Traffic Safely Administration, .Drugs and Human Performance Fact She-ets" 4-4 While House Office or National Drug Control Polley, .Marijuana and Kids: Sleer Clear of POI,. fact sheet. 45 'Nhile House Office of National Drug Control Policy, "\'Vhile House Drug Czar Launches Campaign to Stop Drugged Driving.. press release. citing the New England Journal of Medicine. 46 Aimee Edmondson, .Orug Tests Required of Child Care Drivers.Falal Crash Stirs Change; Many Already Test Positive,. (MemphIs) CommerCIal Appeal, July 2, 2003. 47 See Chuck Hayas, .Drug Recognillon Experts; A Public Safety Resource: The Police Chief 70 .(Oclober2003): 103.106. 48 David 8. Caruso. .Murder Charged In Blaze thai Killed Two F1refighlers,. Assoclated Press, August 21. 200-4. 49 Ali$ha Berger, el al., -rragie 'Pol' Shots;- New York POSI, November 19, 2003. 50 Moniloring the FUlure, .Overall Teen Drug Use Conlinues Gradual Decline: University of Michigan News Service press release (December 21. 2004): 2; available at (WWIV.mo~!\or!nglh.eMure.org). .. 51 MonitOring the Future, .Overall Teen Drug Use-: 2. 52 Monitoring the future, .Overall Teen Drug Use.; 2. 53 U.S. Oepar1ment or-Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and MenIal Health Serv!ces AdmlnlstrallOl1. 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Heallh: Nallonal Findings; 4. Top From The Police Chief, vol. 72, no. 3, March 2005. Copyright held by the Inlemalional Association of Chiefs of Police, 515 North Washington Street. Alexandlia, VA 22314 USA. Return. to Article . The official publication of Ihe Internalional Asseelalien of Chlers of Police. Thl3 online version or the Police Chief Magazine is possible Ihrougha gfilnl from the IACP Foundation. To leCl~n more aboullhc IACP FoundaliOlt click here. . i:"~~di~ . I"!~d lSZJ All eonlenls Copyrighl Cl2003 ~ 2005 Inlernalional Associalion 01 Ct;iels of Police. All Righls Reserved. Copyright and Trademark Notice I Member and Non.Member Supplied Informalion I Links Policy 515 North Washington St.. Alexandri3. VA USA 22314 phone: 703.836.6767 or 1.60lJ.THE IACP fax: 703.831).4543 Cmaled by Matrix Group Inltunalional. Inc.@ hI tp://www.policechiefmagazine.org/magazine/index.c fm ?fuseact i on=prin t_ d ispla y&articl.,. 9( 15(2005 Lehman, Mary Rae 1, /m-#--f-L? Page lof I . Message 'J. --' .d.h From: Wilson, Jolene . Sent: Tuesday, September 27,20054:34 PM To: Du Borg, Lydia; Deven, Mark; Lehman, Mary Rae Subject: Citizen Comments re: medical marijuana dispensaries (Item 3B Importance: High Paul Broadman - resident and business owner in Pleasant Hill, called to share his comments regarding the above issue on tonight's agenda. He said that the CU1Tent dispensary in Concord had no business license until a few months ago, that the employees there are working under the table, no taxes are being raised, and he feels that this type of business needs to be regulated by the government. He a) so said that even people who are well can obtain "cards" for medical marijuana. MrBroadman also indicated that he sent his comments to Supervisor De Saulnier. Jo[ene .Jolene Wilson Confidential Secretary City Manager's Office 1950 Parkside Drive Concord, CA 94519 (925) 671-3150 or 3490 (vm) v VZ;tqi. . /J1~{ ~JJt-~ 09/2712005 - -.J ___n_ - ~----. h!eC J UJ.> !:!]Qg calendar !;Iubs . pownloads ecQ!Qgl1 ener911 facts fQlli!!1 history !lome letters links manifesto nLe.!!.@ Bast neWI; m19nsors studies !!.Illli I;l!!!ll!li!lll yideQ . Please help to fight for your ._r!.r!.~~~~ . IVlu.J= DONATE We are a 501 (c)3 tax- deductible nonprofit corporation. . See 1l.i<!.M QLC_an!1i!.P.il; ErMdorn [JJly..2Q.Q;JJn S.F. Robberies make medical pot-selling a b~ce' .1I1at thts i "'" 01 .' . . . mentonfl il . offl . . . .' ff1~ Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross ?foate.co'SEAL Itycterk .' . rd, Callfomla o:.tMIlIc:I,j'o1li"tt"r--". Angel Pasillas and Levi Williams guard the Health Center in San Leandro, which has had two burglary attempts' in recent months. San Francisco, CA Aug 29, 2005 -- Unlike their mellow brethren in San Francisco, the half-dozen or so medical marijuana clubs that have sprouted up in the urban no-man's-land between San Leandro. and Hayward have turned into something out of the Wild West. There's been a rash of armed robberies, a shooloutthat left one robber dead, and the possible attempted hit of a worker for cooperating with police. "I don't think this is what the voters had in mind when they passed the medical pot law, but that's what we're dealing with," said Alameda County Sheriff's U. Dale Amaral, whose Eden Township beal includes the 2 square miles of unincorporated land where most of the clubs are. The motivation behind the robberies -- big cash and big marijuana. Here's a summary of the incidents Ihalhave occurred in recent months. Thp-firc:::t hin hit wj:lnt rlnwn nn ~lInpr Rn\AtI ~11nr1A\1 I=p.h Fi. ~t tho r.nmn:::a~~inn~tj:l http://www.hempevo)ution.orglmedialsfgate/sfgate050829.htm ,.:"..j..,'.........- Search Hem, [J! ~. ~ (~1II0IUI~/ll' ... ..a' .if _...~-:... III ~ 9/22/2005 """""~-". ~tl>~~It'.M . courtesy of . R.Mott ~ o. ..0 . . ..... ...... ....:1 .... ........ ....... .... ...... .......,..-. oJ....... ....... '--J I 0 ....... "', _. ...... .................__.............. Collective of Alameda County, a medieat marijuana club on Mission Boulevard near San Leandro. According to sheriffs reports, a team of armed hoods busted in, tied up everyone and robbed the place of about $50,000 in cash and an undisclosed amount of "product" i.e., marijuana. . The bandits didn't move fast enough, however, and were caught making their escape by Hayward police. Last month, one of the same club's employees, while pulling into the parking lot. spied a masked man hiding in the bushes. No sooner did the worker hit the gas than the masked figure sprang out and fired four slugs into the car. The worker plowed through cyclone fence to make his getaway unharmed. Sheriffs detectives suspect the shooting was in retaliation for the club cooperating with the cops on the Super Bowl'robbery. About a month later, on Aug. e, three armed robbers burst into the. nearby Hayward Patient ResourCe Center. Again everyone was ordered to hit the floor, and again the robbers cleaned out all the cash and drugs they could grab. It was the second armed robbery of the club within three months. Only this time, an employee hit a silent alarm, so Hayward police were waiting for the robbers as they came out the door, The outcome was much bloodier Aug. 19 at a third club, A Natural Source, on Foothill Boulevard in u.nincorporated San Leandro. This time five men, several of them armed with pistols and semiautomatic rifles, dropped down from the roof behind workers and stormed in as they were opening the club. After forcing the owner to open the safe, the bandits made' off with an undisclosed amount of cash and pot. The owner, however, grabbed a .357 . Magnum and went after the robbers, ordering them to. freeze. The robbers answered with a volley of gunfire. The owner fired back, mortally wounding. one of the assailants. No one else was hurt, but investigators shuddered when they found three slugs embedded in the wall of a neighboring apartment complex. Another club, the Health Center. on East 14th Street, has reported two attempted after-hours burglaries in recent months, including one in which the bandit cut all the wires going into the club, then tried cutting through the wall of the club with power saw. No one keeps tabs on the daily take at the various clubs, but cops have been told by the operators that they take in upward of $25.000 a day - most, if not all of it, cash. "Do the math," said Sheriffs Detective Steve Lenthe. "All day tong there's a steady stream of customers going in, and each spends about $100. You could sit thp.rp. with a r:lir:kp.r ;:Jnn r.nunt thp. r.RRh " http://www.hempevolution.org/medialsfgate/sfgate050829.htm "....0..."" v...1 '~AJ!j . J ~l I) eri May 6 tf St>.lrch fL~t' I 9/2212005 ....b...-~ VI oJ ...-.- ,..... -. -...,.-. ....- .. ..... .,._ ___.n "II's one of the reasons we have an armored service come and why we're starting to take credit cards," said Jack NOr1on, who runs the Health Center. Angel Pasillas, whose HP Security guards watch over Norton's clinic and two other clubs in the area, likened the marijuana establishments to banks. "But a bank has guards and all these cameras." Pasillas said. "Some of these clubs only have some big friend of the owner at the door." The cops, however, said that there's another issue at play here -- one that may be going on far from the clubs themselves. "I can't say there's any direct connection to the clubs. but the number of arrests for possession of marijuana at schools in the neighborhood went up from 21 to 34 last year," Amaral said. The fear is that small-lime dealers are getting medical cards, then using the clubs as their personal wholesale outlet. These and other concerns prompted county supervisors to pass an ordinance limiting customers to 8 ounces of pot a month per club, and selling a 20-pound limit on the amount of marijuana that a club on unincorporated land may have on the premises. The county is going to allow only three clubs to operate on unincorporated land. With the deadline for applications set for Tuesday, only one of the clubs now operating near San Leandro has applied. Perhaps the others are wondering if staying in business is worth the risk. http://wv.w.hempevolulion.org/medialsfgale/sfgale050829 .hlm 9/22/2005 Marijuana Abust. <~-+'-:~9) F' Ci.) . -, By NIDA Director Nora D_ Volkow, M.D. (\ cJ O.JvO-V\A( ~Ji'l \ rzr::re, J1 0 VU-tj cJ;-tvz-~,' il lj tJ More than 96 million Americons have on the effect of marijuana during all phases of smoked n13rijuana at least once. neurological development, rrom the neurogcnesis Marijuana abuse is particularly prevalent and cell differentiation that takes place in Ihe among adolescents: Of the more than 2 million womb to the refinement of cOnl~ections ;\I11ong people who abuse the drug for the first lime every cells Ihat conlinues past adolescence. Our . }'ear, two-thirds are between] 2 and 17 ye;Jrs of research iniliative will produce a fuller under- 'age, ."anding of normative brain devetopment. it also The damaging effects of marijuana fall heavily will illuminate the importance of f:lInily and social on adolescents and young adulls. Half of ..II COJ1lexts in adolescence as well os the differing potienls admilled to Ireatment for nmrijuana abuse biological and environmem..1 factors that precede are younger lhnn 21. Cognitive impairments marijuana use or nonuse. caused by inarijuana linger a mOJ1lh or more after NIDA also is exponding support of research an individual's last exposure, and the damage is to develop treolments for marijuana abuse (see dose dependem-Ihe more a person snioked prior RFA DA-04.014, "Medications Development lor . to abstinence, the more marked are the deleteri- Cannabis-Related Disorder," m bllp:llgmllls2.l/ib.gov/ ous effects on visual perceplion, verbal and visuat grallls/gllide//:/ajiles/RFA-DA-04-014.blllll). There memolY, executive function, :.Inti manual dexterity, is n delr public health need for interventions 10 ~mong other mental capabilities (see "Cognitive alleviate withdrawal symptoms and to help Deficits in Marijuana Smokers Persist After Use chronic ~busers deal wilh social and other factors SlOpS," ,vIDA NOTES, Vol. ]8, No.5, p. 8). Loss of that m;lke stOpping marijuana abuse difficult. social and intellectuo! growlli because of these NIDA's expanded research 'lgenda wiil encourage impainnems may h:lve a lifelong imp:lct on a development of medications to counter l11;Jriju:J.nJ person's experience and achievement. As well, dependence Ihrough animal studics as well ;IS compared with teens who never smoke marijuana, Phase I ami Phase II dinical triaJs with hUI11:ms. a boy or girl who smokes marijuana before age] 7 Some medications will be aimed at l1l;lfijuan,. is more th:1n t~vice as likely to abuse opioids,' associated disorders such as intoxication, delirium. thrce times as likely to abuse cocaine or other psychosis: and anxiety. Other medicotions m,y stimulants, and nearly four times as likely to abusc address specific aspects of ~ddiction recovery, hallucinogens later in life (see "Twins Study Links such as withdrawal, craving, relapsc, and compli- Early Marijuana Use to Incre~sed .Risk of Abuse cations such as cognitive impairment, sleep or Dependence," NIDA NOTES, Vol. ]8, No.4, disorders, and depression and other mood p. 1 I). disorders that often accompany marijuana abuse. NIDA is intensifying efforts. to fully understand Successful comprehensive treatment of the effects of m~rijuana exposure from the earliest marijuana-rel:lled disorders will require a multidis. :lges through adolescence and young adulthood. ciplinary approach. Therefore, NlDA's marijuan' .This research (see RFA DA-04-0]6, "Consequences medications development initiative will encomge of Marijuona Use on Ihe Developing Brain," at invesligation of trealments th;t include beha"iOrJl http://gml11s2.llih.govlgrall/s/gllidellja-jileslintervention.This broad focus, building on the RFA-DA-04-016.b/mO will provide new insight insights to ,be gained through increased under. into the mechanisms by which mariju,ma affects st:lnding of marijuana's developmental impact, bmin development, ~ continuum that begins will help reduce the heatth costs and alleviole bcfore birth and lasts into early adullhood. We the damage innicted by widespread abuse 01 this are encour:lging research projects that focus d~ngerous drug. ~ RoM:. "Dv fYC!-J.. I' I ~ \ J './ !)( '-"\ S ,'! e'i"~--"- '., 'j I , ']' Ij , 1~ ~ 'f ., fl. 1 ':1 J/:s.Jj./ l..f.t.)( 7'1 Volume 20, Number 1 NIDA NOlES .' . . 1 "~(J: ?l' ~.' \',~ I' f'- ,'. -:""',..- . ;, ; I. f' .!. J "'/' . / " .i.-, \,'. 1)'71.t..J /I ,lL" J.!. ~ECElVED :p 152005 ~*~.;, ,,<4~~ Il., I' "~I c/ ) liJ)t~ U{'I,).,' 'J.l/t "I ~>; v (~I,J>f 3 MGR'S. OFFiCE ," "~ :.1 ..] ; 'i 1 j ! , ; .- .' SEP 14 '05 11'26 f ~ED J VONSTl EF MD 9256807635 TO 536 P.01'-03 A V7949540 FRED J, VON STIEFF, M.D.jA.A.F.P. A PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL CORPORATlON PHYSICIAN' & SURCEON BOARD CERTlF'IED FAMILY PRACTICE OCCUPATIONAL/INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE 2481 PACHECO STREET CONCORD. CA 94520 PHONE (925) 680-8933 FAX (925) 680-7635 CA G34928 September 8. 2005 Honorable,Laura M. Hoffmeister Mayor of Concord ] 950 Parkside Drive Concord, California 94519 Rc: Marijuana club in Concord. Dear Mayor Hoffmeister: I recently had the Opportunity to read the Contra Costa Times and understand that there are political pressures that were outlined in that newspaper article about a marijuana club wanting to Open up in the City of Concord. r am very concerned about a marijuana club opening up in the Concord area for many reasons. One reason is that I have been in family practice associated with Mt. Diablo Hospital for the last 25 years. Currently,] am Medical Director of John Muir/Mt, Diablo Health System's Center for Recovery Drug Unit on the north campus of Mt. Diablo Hospital. We have dctoxified 15,000 patients there an.d are cognizant of the drug/alcohol problems in this district. Marijuana is definitely One drug that has becn devastating to the population. This illegal drog is definitely addictive, causing family consequences, health Conscquences, lega.l consequences, psychological consequences, and job consequences. Many people describe this drug as a medicinal to many ailments. The physicians at Mt. Diablo and John Muir Hospitals have not seen any benefit for marijuana in its patients, We are not using it for glaucoma; We rarely Use it for cancer pa.tients who cannot eat. Its consequences far outweigh the benefits of the drug. and it is an illegal drug. Page I 01' 3 . j' ~ i . '0'.l) t\'. ,j jl V,," l:).1 J.' . / )') .J I)' --I "l' . )1).. , VI V;' J ,. ., '. 1 ., :, ii :j :~ 'l -J' , 1. , i ; , , !. SEP 14'05 11=26 F . "I) J IJONSTIEF MD 9256807635 TO " _ .636 P, 02/03 To: The Honorable Laura Hotfmeister I am very familiar with the endocannabinoid research, which is a billion dollar market opening up, We have OVer 400 different chemicals in OUr body, and those are associated with receptor sites that are also in the brain and in almost every cell in the body. Onc of those chemicals is caJledour oWn endocannabinoids. Endocannabinoid is a chemical located in the brain that everyone has to a certain extent. The receptor sites are needed. Alcohol increases endocannabinoids and has an effect on that system. New research in the endocannabinoid system is directed towards obesity, pain control, and many other factors that are too complicated to list at this point in time, Marijuana is an extemaJ plant; we call it an exogenous chemical, and it does activate OUr iI'lherent or endogenous receptor sites one way or. another as an agonistic or a heightened stimulus to those receptor sites. In the future, we will sce new drugs coming out that are legal and that will be tested in a Correct way to be an adjunct and facilitate these receptor sites in a medical way; research will telL I believe that it is too early for the City of Concord representatives to okay a marijuana club. when this is a drug that cannot be controlled in its quality and/or be utilized in a correct manner on a scientific basis. That is for research to work out for u.s in the next several years when we will have significant scientific findings. During my experience in the chemical dependency field locally, I have seen many abuses of marijuana clubs. Many patients who 90 not have chronic pain who are detoxified by me are getting marijuana from these clubs, and they have no chronic pain or other conditions for which they obtain these drugs. I belie\'c that the methodology of dispersing marijuana by these.c1ubs leaves much to bc desired. When push comes to shove in this situation in this area, ] am very uneasy with marijuana clubs and how they disperse their medications and what their medications are dispersed for. Again, it is illegal; It also is not a healthy method of medicinal regulation, and it is definitely another factor that decreases the abIlity of oUr children to get an education. The proponents of marijuana state that marijuana stays in your system for only three hours, but people continue to have positive urine drug screens for one month, Urine drug sCreens do not tell us whether a person' has a health and safety issue while on these drugs. Marijuana recommendation cards indicate that you cannot drive a vehicle under the influence of marijuana. The question is when are the levels high and when are the levels low? Scientific methodology in the quality regulation and understanding toxicity is out of the Page Z of 3 SEP 14 'OS 11:26 Fl. ,~ J VONSTlEF ~lD 9256807635 TO 7. ,36 P.03/03 '. .~ .,,; .. ) , :! , ., , , 1 i j ! ; ! I I. ~ To: The r lonorable Laura Hoffmeister question at tI1is time. There are too many questions involved at this point in time. Again, I would not want a marijuana club or the dispersing of mariJuana . in the City of Concord. If I can be of any further help, please contact me, Sincerely, l~:iJv~~n ~ Frea J. Von Stieff, M.D. . Medical Director, C.enter for Recovery, Mt. Diablo Hospital/John Muir Hospital American Society of Addiction Medicine Califomia Society of Addiction Medicine FJV/lo/kl D: 09/08/05 T: 09/08/05 '. '. Page 3 of 3 :. ** TOTAL PAGE.03 ** ,\mcric:\I1 Civil Libmic$ Uni dcdical ~13ri.illana: An Ovc;\iew Page I ('of 2 URL: Medical Marijuana: An Overview November 15. 2000 Marijuana has been found to relieve symptoms of many serious diseases, including asthma, glaucoma, muscle spasms, and toss of appetile and.nauseadue to AIDS wasling syndrome and chemotherapy treatment. Many professional medical associations, including the American Medical Association, the American Public Heallh Association, and the New England Journal of Medicine have publically supported prescriptive access to marijuana. The federal government, however, has tong opposed the tegalization of marijuana lor medical use. It continues to list marijuana asa Schedule I drug: "unsafe, highly subject to abuse, and possessing no medical value." Source: ACLU Spring Spotlight 98, among others. Health Dangers of Marijuana Use Largely Myth: Although the government has long opposed marijuana legalization in the name of public health and safety, every independent commission appointed \0 evaluate the dangers of marijuana use has found this claim to be unsubsta ntialed: . . For example, ,. . concluded in 1972, after years of research, that, ~It]here is little proven danger of physical or psychological harm from the experimental or intermittent use of natural preparations of cannabis." Despite the fact that it had been established in the hopes of finding fuel for just the cpposite conclusion, the commission recommended the decriminalization of marijuana for personal use. Nixon ignored the recommendation of the commission his administration had appointed. Source: "Marijuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding," lhe Report of the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (available at above site) . In 1982, the National Academy of Sciences released its i ,. ,., ,i. . that, "[o]ver the last forty years marijuana has been accused of causing an array of anti-social effects including. , . provoking crime and violence, . . . leading to heroin addiction, . . . and destroying the American work ethic in young people. [These] beliefs. . . have not been substantiated by scientific evidence." . Source: Analysis of Marijuana laws conducted by National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine, 1982 (available at above site). . A report released in March of 1999 by the National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine, the end result of two years of government-funded research, concluded that marijuana has beneficial medical effects, ranging from pain reduction, particularly for cancer patients, to nausea reduction and appetite stimulation, in certain circumstances. The report strongly recommended moving marijuana to the status of a schedule" drug, available for prescription by doclors. it also slated that many of the drug's supposed ill affects are false or unsubstantiated by scientific evidence. Among these are: o the supposed anti-motivational or anti-soeiat affects of the drug; http://w\Vw.aclu.org!news/NewsPrinl.cfm?ID~ II OJ8&c~81 9/6/2005 ,\mencan Civil Liberties lJ. '. i\1edical ~fnrijuai1a: "An Overview Page 2 of2 o that legalizing medical marijuana will increase overall use of the drug; o that the drug more addictive than other drugs available for prescription; o that its side affects are more harmful than those of other drugs; o that marijuana serves as a gateway drug; o that marijuana causes brain damage; o that marijuana causes fertility problems; and o that marijuana shortens life expectancy. Source: National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine 1999 report: "Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base" and the I~arijuana Poiicy Project. . To find out more about this important study, and its reassuring answers to many common questions concerning the dangers of marijuana use, visit the . Also read the Project's . . Popularity of Medical Marijuana Legalization: . A 1999 doctors. found that 73% of Americans favored legalizing the prescriplion of marijuana by Source: Aprit 9,1999 Gallup Poll Press Release (available at above site). . Since 1996, Alaska, Arizona, California, Cotorado, the District of Columbia, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington State have approved ballot initiatives legalizing medical marijuana. Government Strong-arming in Response to Medical Marijuana Initiatives: . The federal government, worried that the states were breaking rank, was quick to respond. When California passed its medical marijuana initiative in 1996, the government responded by threatening to arrest doctors who recommended the drug to patients. It again used gag-tactics in its attempt to shut up the voters of the District 01 Columbia, blocking the release 01 the election results of their medical marijuana ballot initiative in 1998. @ACLU, 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 This is the Web site of lheAmel Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation. :. ,:.;. ::: ".: ,; about the distinction between these two components of the ACLU. I ,. http://www.aclu.org/news/NewsPrint.cfm?ID=II038&c=81 9/6/2005 Exhibit E .-.~_.._- I I certify ~a(tf1I. Is a 'AdOCU enton SEA~ ~ REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE CONCORD CtTY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY COUNCIL CONFERENCE ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBER 1950 PARKSIDE DRIVE CONCORD, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 4, 2005 The Concord City Council and Redevelopment Agency met in a Closed Session meeting on Tuesday, October 4, 2005 to confer with Legal Counsel pursuant to Government code Section 54956.9(b)(3)(C} - potential litigation. The meeting convened at 5:40 p.m. in the City Council Conference Room, Mayor Hoffmeister presiding. All Couneilmembers were present and there were no public comments. The meeting recessed at 6:00 p.m. to reconvene in the Council Chamber. The Concord City Council and Redevelopment Agency reconvened at 6:35 p.m. in the Council Charnber, Mayor/Agencymember Hoffmeister presiding. The pledge to the flag was led by Councilmllmber Allen. Minutes follow in abbreviated form per Resolution 3361 and Council Minutes of Sllptember 26, 1966. ROLL CALL COUNCILME'MBERS PRESENT: . I COUNCILME'MBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE . WHO ADDRESSED COUNCIL: PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD Helen Allen, Susan Bonilla, Mark Peterson, Bill Shinn, Laura Hoffmeister None Lydia Du Borg, City Manager; Mary Rae Lehman, City Clerk; Craig Labadie, City Attorney; Mark Deven, Assistant City Manager; Peggy Lefebvre, Director of Finance; Cherie Rosenquist, Director of Human Resources; Oamar Khan, Director of Public Works- Malntenanee Services; Ron Puccinelli, Director of Information Technology; Deborah Raines, Planninn Manager: Frank Abejo, Associate Planner Staeey Street, Walnut Creek; David Johnson, San Francisco; Jesse Couch, Foster City; Robert Raich, Oakland; Demetrio Ramirez, Concord; Ted Meadows, Concord; Bill McPike, Auberry; Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky, Concord Staelly.Street, representing the California Symphony, extended thanks to the City for the support of the suceessful Symphony in the Park event held on September 18, 2005 in T odos Santos Plaza and presented a framed memento. I City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes October 4, 2005 PRESENTATION - BiNationat Health Week Mayor Hoffmeister presented a proclamation to Raul Rojas, representing the Monument Community Partnership, proclaiming October 8 -16, 2005 as BiNational Health Week and noted the annual Monument Community Health Fair would be held on SatUrday, October 8, 2005 from 11 :00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at Meadow Homes Park encouraging all persons to attend. PRESENTATION - 25-Vear Service Award o Mayor Hoffmeister presented a plaque to 25-year employee Marilyn Wilburn, Microcomputer Coordinator with the Information Technology Department, and congratulated her for her accomplishments. Ron Puccinelli, Director of Information Technology, gave a brief overview of Ms. Wilburn's career. PRESENTATION - U. S. Flao Flown over Baohdad. Irao Adair Macfarlane. Building Inspector, on behalf of Voodoo 06,1" Battalion, 3,d Aviation Regiment,,3'd Infantry Division in which her son proudiy serves, presented a U. S. Flag flown by the battalion over Baghdad, Iraq on June 21, 2005 and a supporting certificate to the City. She stated the flag was an expression of appreciation by the battalion for the support Concord emptoyees have shown to all the men and women serving in the military. PRESENTATION - Recoqnition of Employees or FamilY Members Servino the Mililarv in Iraa and Afohanistan Mayor Hoffmeister presented Certiiicates of Recognition to employees Adair Macfarlane, recognizing her son who is currently serving his second tour of duty in Iraq; and to John Rego, whose nephew served duty in Iraq. The Mayor also recognized employee James Gravely, who served a tour of duty in Irag, and employee Bob Goss, whose son served a tour of duty in Iraq. o CITY COUNCil MATTERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Allen to approve the minutes of September 6, 2005, and September 13, 2005. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. LEASE AGREEMENT WITH 1957 PARKSIDE L.L.C. - Office and Storaoe Space Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Allen to approve a three-year building lease with 1957 Parkside L.L.C. for Public Works-Engineering Services and Building and Neighborhood Services' office and storage space at 1957 Parkside Drive (APN 111-230-019) eommencing December 1,2005; and. to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement and future yearly lease options. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-72 - Application for Fundina for Owner-Occupied Home Rehabilitation and First-Time Homebuver Mortoaoe Assistance Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Allen to adopt Resolution 05-72 entilled, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITVDEVELOPMENT FOR FUNDING UNDER THE CAlHOME PROGRAM; THE EXECUTION OF A STANDARD AGREEMENT IF SELECTED FOR SUCH FUNDING AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO; AND ANY RELATED DOCUMENTSNECESSARV TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CALHOME PROGRAM," and to o 2 I I I City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes October 4, 2005 authorize the City Manager to execute the ioan documents. Motion passed by unanimous vote of . the Council. SETTING FOR PUBLIC HEARING - Proposed Amendment to Concord Municipal Code- Parktand In-Lieu Fees Motion was made by Shinn and seconded by Allen to set a public hearing for Tuesday, October 25, 2005 at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber to consider a proposed amendment to the Concord Municipal Code regarding Parkland In-Lieu Fees, amending Chapter 78 (Planning and Development), Article IV (Parktand Requirements), Section 78-94 relating to a 50% reduetic,n in Parkland In-Lieu Fees for projects which provide for affordable housing. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. . ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 05-69 - Wisteria Residential Subdivision (Formerlv Beach Street) The notice of public hearing was published in the Contra Costa Times and posted in the posting cabinet at the Civic Center on September 23, 2005. Franl< Abejo, Associate Planner, presented a report, referring to his memorandum dated October 4, 2(105, concerning an application by Legacy Partners for a Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) to construct 39 single family homes on a 2.56-acre site at 2611 Willow Pass Road and 1935 and 1954 Beach Street. He stated the City Council had previously approved an application to Rezonethe subject properties to Pianned District and certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration, however had remanded the PDP to the Planning Commission and Design Review Board for revisions to the project architecture. He went on to say that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the PDP and had approved an application for a Use Permit, Vesting Tentative Map, Tree Removal and Final Design .Review application pending the Council's approval. He eoncluded by saying the project would enhance the property and the neighborhood. DilYiCI Johnson, Architect for the project, and Jesse Couch of Legacy Partners, gave an overview of the architectural changes. The public hearing opened and closed without comment. Followin9 discussions, motion was made by Peterson and seconded by Shinn to adopt Resolution 05-69 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE WISTERIA RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION," with conditions to add design details 10 the gables, windows to the garage doors, and to modify the roof styles on the patios from a shed roof to a hip roof. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. REPORT FROM THE COUNCiL AD HOC COMMITTEE ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES Mayor Hoffmeister announced that there were a number of persons wishing to addn~ss the Council on this item. Robel1 Raich, attorney representing MariCare, stated that he felt the report provided by the Ad Hoc Committee was one-sided by not stating what effect closure of the medical marijuana dispensaries would have on the people who depend upon the ability to purchase from the dispensaries operating in Concord and by not taiking about physician support for the use of medical cannabis. Demetrio Ramirez, owner of MariCare, stated that they were looking for a new location and had hoped that the Council would support his operation. 3 - City Council/Redevelopment Agency Minutes October 4,2005 Ted Meadows. resident, and Bill McPike, attorney, each requested the Council reconsider the prohibition of medical marijuana dispensaries in the City of Concord. o Mayor Hoffmeister reported that she and Councilmember Shinn has met as an Ad Hoc Committee with two John Muir/Mt. Diablo Health Care professionals to gain an understanding of how doctors recommend the use of marijuana and why clinics and pharmacies do not dispense it. She stated that the doctors admit there is a difference of opinion within the medical profession regarding the benefits of use, and confirmed that doctors can not prescribe marijuana but can recommend its use. She further stated that the committee felt that the ordinance was appropriate and that the two dispensaries currently operating in the City without benefit of a business license should be given 60 days following the etfective date of the ordinance to suspend their operations. Coun.cilmember Shinn stated that the Committee was requested to expiore alternative avenues to dispense. medical marijuana to residents, and further stated that the City Council was not the level of government to be making decisions about allowing medical marijuana dispensary operations. He encouraged those opposed to the iocal prohibition of dispensaries to take the issue to the State and Federal governments to get the laws changed. Motion was made by Hoffmeister and seconded by Shinn directing the currentty operating medical marijuana dispensaries in the Cily of Concord to terminate business operations within sixty (60) days following the effective date of Ordinance 05-9, which was adopted on Sgptember 27, 2005, and to authorize the City Attorney and City staff to enforce Ordinance 05-9. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MATTERS. o ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS 05-4735.2 AND 05-678 - Pav Rance Increase in the Executive and Manaoement Pav Schedule Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Bonilla to adopt Resolution 05-4735.2 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN THE EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT PAY SCHEDULE," and Redevelopment Agency Resolution 05-678 entitled, A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN THE EXECUTIVE AND MANAGEMENT PAY SCHEDULE, " approving an increase in the Executive and Management Pay Schedule in the amount of 2.5%, and an increase in the Sworn Management Pay Schedule in the amount of 3.0%, effective October 10, 2005. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Counell. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS 05.4735.3 AND 05-67.9 - Increase. in the Confidential Emolovee Pav Schedule This item was pulled from the agenda by Joseph V. A. "Joe" Partansky who stated that he would like to see agenda items include amounts: Motion was made by Allen and seconded by Shinn to adopt Resolution 05-4735.2 entitled,"A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN THE CONFIDENTIAL PAY SCHEDULE," and Redevelopment Agency Resolution 05-679 entitled, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN tNCREASE IN THE CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE PAY SCHEUDLE," approving a pay range inerease in the Confidential Employee Pay Schedul.e in the amount of 2,03% effective October 10, 2005. Motion passed by unanimous vote of the Council. o 4 City CounciVRedevelopment Agency Minutes October 4, 2005 I . COUNCIL AND STAFF REPORTS Vice Mayor Bonilla reported on her altendance at the World Communion Sunday event, recently held at Todos Santos Plaza. Mayor Hoffmeister reported on her attendance at SI. Francis Assisi's Centennial celebration. By order of the chair, the meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. ;-{J Yl'I&lM1.L~"C/ _ V~OFFMEIST MAYORMGENCYMEMR ~RSON ~ ----- COUNCILMEMBER/AGENCY CHAIR. IIn MARY 'E LEHMAN CITY L RKIAGENCY SECRETARY I 5 ITEM NO. 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager pu.r /J1l ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: PA05-0139 - A Development Plan for Plaza Rio Vista Office Building PREPARED BY: Harmony Linton, Assistant Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULAAPPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05- 0139, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,680 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON A 1.41 ACRE SITE IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND BLACKDEER LOOP, KNOWN AS APN 921-030-016 AND APN 921-030-017 BACKGROUND: Planning Application No. PA05-0139 is a Development Plan to design and construct an 18,680 square foot office building on 1.41 acres, located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop in a Light Industrial Zone (L1). New office buildings in the LI Zone are subject to the performance standards contained in Section 17.08.070E of the Development Code (see attached). The proposed building is an office building less than 50,000 square feet and, therefore, the project requires review by the City Council per Section 17.08.030 of the Development Code. Planninq Commission Action This project was presented to the Planning Commission on March 15, 2006. The Planning Commission reviewed the staff report of record and held a public hearing. The project architect spoke in favor of the project, and advised that he would be in agreement of the Conditions of Approval. The public hearing was closed, and the Planning Commission voted 3-0 recommending the City Council approve the project. Commissioner Chiniaeff was absent. Development Plan The project conforms to the development regulations of the Light Industrial (L1) zoning district. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and the 0.30 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district. The proposed 19.47 percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40 percent. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site, as well as for emergency vehicles. Access to the proposed building will be provided from a 24-foot wide drive aisle off Slackdeer Loop. The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 10,016 square feet or 23.34 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum landscaping requirements in the LI (Light Industrial) zone. The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The exterior architecture is enhanced with the use of arched pop-out elements, stone veneer and arched window accents. The building design includes a concave element on the corner of Diaz Road and Slackdeer Loop. This element includes a pergola supported by pre-cast Tuscan columns. A raised stone veneer planter will be planted with an ornamental tree to punctuate the concave curve of the building adding a focal point. The main building entrance is located internal to the site and is accentuated by another pergola. The building includes various breaks in the wall planes and parapet design, which in conjunction with landscaping, breaks up building mass from street view. Environmental Review In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review per Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. FISCAL IMPACT: paid by the developer. None. All costs associated with the proposed development will be ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 06-_ Excerpt from Development Code Section 17.08.070E Planning Commission Staff Report of March 15,2006 Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes (March 15, 2006) RESOLUTION NO. 06- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05-0139, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN 18,680 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.41 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND BLACKDEER LOOP THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. James Horecka, filed Planning Application No. PA05-0139, Development Plan for the property consisting of approximately 1.41 acres generally located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop known as Assessor's Parcel No(s). 921-030-016 and 921-030-017 ("Project"). B. The application for the project was processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on March 15, 2006 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter. D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-26 recommending approval of a Development Plan to the City Council. E. On April 25, 2006 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. F. On April 25, 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Development Plan for the Project when it approved Resolution No. 06-_. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. The Project, including the Development Plan, has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are adequate for emergency vehicles. B. The Project, including the Development Plan, is compatible with surrounding land uses. C. The Project, including the Development Plan, will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project does not represent a significant change to the planned land uses for the site and represents a relocation of existing land uses. Section 3. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development Code and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the project has been reviewed and it has been determined that the project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the General Plan. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application for a Development Plan (PA05-0139) for the construction of a two-story, 18,680 square foot office building located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop, (Assessor's Parcel No. 921-030-016 and 921-030-017), subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 25th day of April , 2006. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 06- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 25th day of April 2006, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA05-0139 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a two-story, 18,680 square foot office building on 1.41 acres located on the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop Assessor's Parcel No. 921-030-016 and 921-030-017 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Office Office Office Approval Date: Pending City Council Determination Expiration Date: Pending City Council Determination WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and G.ame Code Section 711.4(c)). G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPianninglDraft COA's.doc 3 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the Final Conditions of Approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. The applicant shall submit a sign program to be approved by the Planning Commission prior to any signs being permitted. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\PlanninglDraft COA's.doc 4 Material Main Body texture and color Color Color Coat, Sand Finish; "Dover White" SW6385 Color Coat, Sand Finish; Feature Walls Cornice, Trim and Trellis Columns "Bagel" SW6114 "Porto bello" SW61 02 "Tuscan" Pattern Roofing Tile Stone "Shortbread" SW8135 Mission Tile; Eagle Roofing #3522 Eldorado Stone, Cascade Rustic Ledge 10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. Public Works Department 12. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way. 13. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right of way. 14. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted 'on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 15. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. 16. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the City. The WQMP will include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment mechanisms. Fire Prevention 17. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 5 California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 18. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 3250 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM for a total fire flow of 3650 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 19. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off- site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 440 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 20. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 21. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Community Services Department 22. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 23. The developer shall contact the City's franchised. solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 24. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. 25. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the maintenance association. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\PlanninglDraft COA's.doc . 6 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPianningIDraft COA's.doc 7 Planning Department 26. The applicant shall submit and have approved a Certificate of Parcel Merger with the Planning Department to legalize the Parcel Merger for the property. 27. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Colors and Materials Board and colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Colors and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 28. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 29. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property oWner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Public Works Department 30. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 31. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 32. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Sailor Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 33. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\PlanninglDraft COA's.doc 8 34. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. 35. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. 36. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works 37. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 38. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 39. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 40. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 9 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 10 Planning Department 41. All downspouts shall be internalized. 42. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans. d. One copy of the approved grading plan. e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). g. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 43. Crape Myrtle street trees along Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop shall be revised to Platanus acerifolia 'Bloodgood'. 44. Phormium tenax 'Jack Sprat' spacing shall be revised to 24" on center. 45. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in orderto reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is nol!o look like an after- thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 46. Building Construction Plans shall include details outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, and hardscape to match the style of the building subjectto the approval of the Planning Director. 47. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". 48. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 11 Public Works Department 49. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 50. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Diaz Road (Major Highway Standards - 100' RIW) to include installation of sidewalk, street light, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), and raised landscaped median. i) The Developer shall design and construct or provide an in lieu of construction fee for half-width raised landscape median on Diaz Road from Blackdeer Loop to the northerly property boundary. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. b. Improve Blackdeer Loop (Collector Road Standards - 66' RIW) to include installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 51. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter, median, sidewalk, drive approach, street lights. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Sewer and domestic water systems. 52. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\planninglDraft COA's.doc 12 53. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 54. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 ofthe Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 55. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney. 56. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Building and Safety Department 57. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 58. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 59. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 60. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 61. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 62. Show all building setbacks. 63. Developments with Multi-tenant Buildings or Shell Buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\PlanninglDraft COA's.doc 13 64. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998) 65. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 66. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 67. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 68. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays 69. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 70. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 71. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 72. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 73. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. 74. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 75. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Fire Prevention 76. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 14 77. Prior to issuance of buildinQ permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) Community Services Department 78. If new streetlights will be installed as a result of this project then the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. 79. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\planninglDraft COA's.doc 15 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\planninglDraft COA's.doc 16 Planning Department 80. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 81. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the apprqved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, orpests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 82. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 83. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorizedsign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parkea in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." . 84. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 85. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 86. All ofthe foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Public Works Department 87. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans .and are ready for immediate implementation. G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Piaza Rio Vista DP\PlanninglDraft COA's.doc 17 88. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 89. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 90. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention 91. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 92. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 93. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 94. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire riser room shall have direct access to exterior of the building. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 95. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 96. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 97. Prior to final inspection of anv buildino. the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for aPDroval. a site plan desionatino Fire Lanes with appropriate lane paintino and or sians. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 18 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\planninglDraft COA's.doc 19 98. The applicant shall comply with the Department of Environmental Health letter dated May 20, 2005. 99. The applicant shall comply with the Rancho California Water District letter dated May 27, 2005. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Printed Name Date Applicant's Signature G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglDraft COA's.doc 20 May 23 2r-c 16:51 P.03 o COUNTY OF RlVERSIDt: · HFALTH SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTP May 20, 2005 City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O. BOK 9033 Temecula; CA 92589.9033 Attention: Hannony Bales i , RE: D.evelopment Plan No. P A05-O 139 (pre-DRC Meeting date June 9, 2005) Dear Mr. Fisk: 1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Development Plan No. PA05.0139 co~structs a 19,650 sq. ft. commercial building on .99 acres and has no objections. Although we hare no recent information in regards water and sewer availability, water and sewer servioes should be available in this area. . 2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: . a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water.and sewering.districts. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (inoluding vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be subtnitted including a fixture schedule, a fmish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Ulrlform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific refer~ce, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (951) 600-6330. . c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (955.5055) will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: . Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. . . Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. . Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2). . Waste reduction managenient. ; Gregor I. rjellenbach, Environmental Health Specialist IV (951) 95548980 NOTE: i Any current additional requirements not COVeTed can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for finsl Department of Environmental Health clearance. cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Local Enforcement Agency' P.O. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502.1280 . (9091955.8982 ' FAX (909) 781.9653 . 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor. Riverside, CA 92501 Land U.. and Wate, En~ine.'ing . P.O. Box 1206. River.de, CA 92502-1206 . (9091955-8980 ' FAX 1909) 955-8903 '.4080 L.mon Su..\, 2nd Ftoor, River.de, CA 92501 I@ Rancho Water Board of Directors Csaba F. Ko President Ben R. Drake Sr. Vice President Stephen J. Corona Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman John E. Hoagland Michael R. McMillan Officers: Brian J. Brady Gt!neral Manager Phillip L Forbes Director-of Finance-Treasurer EP. "Bob~ Lemons Duector of Engineering Perry R. Louck Director of Planning JeffD.Armstrong Controller Linda M. Frego,so District Secretary! Administrative Services Manager C. Michael Cowett Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel -. ----- ." May 27, 2005 HaImony Bales, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 :;'TH~\\ .:\li JUN 0 2 Z005 i li i! ~~ !; , '~'. i I ! \:?':t _~___.;::-::-:~::::--:-:::~,~::=:::~"-:;:;-J ,...,',,<.--' SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PLAZA RIO VISTA; .PARCELS NO. 10 AND NO. 11 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 12890; APN NO. 921-030-016 AND NO. 921-030-017; PA05-0139 [ALFRED AND INGE HEINZELMANN] Dear Ms. Bales: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site water facilities and the completion of fmancial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer. will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability-would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. The project should be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape irrigation. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. . Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT IYlJflIt. . . I ~icCel G. Meyerpeter, P.E. Develop-ment Engineering Manager 05\MM:lm040IFEG 4~(ot '-"'., 'RANCUU . ..#-~'\ ClI.Ln'ORNJA , ~ 'VATER ~ I)I~TJUGI' ..~;~~....".......~1>-. c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Rancho California Water District 42135WinchesterRoad . Post Office Box 9017 . Temecula,California92589-9017. (951)296-6900 . F~{951)296-6860 17.08.070 COMMERCIAUOFFICE/INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to prqvide for uniform performance standards and criteria for the design of commercial buildings within the city in accordance with the cognition that the quality and compatibility of building design directly impacts the health, s ety and welfare of the residents of. the community. Moreover, quaiity and compatible buil 'ng design promotes and preserves the stability of the city through orderly growth and enha ement of a quality business environment. These purposes are further achieved througH he following: . - 1. The enhancement of the physical character of the community and quality of life throu sound planning and coordinated development. 2. The bala ing of aesthetic design qualities with functional development. 3. The preserva . on and enhancement of the physical character, integrity and quality of commercial/of e/industrial areas. 4. The enhancement nd protection of property values and the adherence to the goals . and policies of the g eral plan. 5. The stimulation of imp vements and maintenance of surrounding properties, thereby preventing and re rsing the effects of urban blight. B. General Performance Standards. De lopments in the commercial/office/industrial districts should be designed to provide variety a visual interest while still creating a unified overall image. Performance standards to achie this image include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Use creative entry treatments with such atures as canopies, awnings, cornices or atriums. 2. Use a variety of complementary colors and a id the use of just one color and dark colors. 3. Use various window shapes and sizes. 4. Vary the building shapes by using curved or angled w 5. Separate buildings or accessory structures should be desi ed as an integral part of the primary building by using complementary materials, ammon architectural elements, and special landscape design techniques. 6. Use a consistent design theme throughout the project. Employ c plementary or consistent details, shapes, materials and colors. In addition, con . tent signage should be provided with complementary colors, lettering, placement a d materials. 7. The bulk of the building should be divid.ed to redUCe the apparent scale an provide visual interest. Box"like designs shOUld be avoided. This can be accom fished through the following: a. Use variations in the building footprints and facades. Such variations shou be proportional to the overall bulk of the buildings with variations beirlg greater for large buildings. ..-/ Includes Amendments as of July 1, 2005 Chapter 17.08 . 18 b. Use a variety of shapes and forms including architectural projections such as roof overhangs, box windows, stairways, balconies, and cantilevers that create shadows on the buildings. c. Use contrasting vertical and horizontal elements that help to break the visual mass of the facade into smaller areas. Divide the bulk of the roof into smaller areas to reduce the apparent scale of the building and provide visual interest. The roof can be designed with varying heights and slopes to contrast with a flat roof. 8. Where e character or scale is identifiable, new development should be designed to maintain at character and to be compatible with that scale. In areas where the character' not identifiable, new development should be designed to be complement rY or consistent with desirable characteristics of the surrounding area in a way that con ibutes to the establishment of a positive character and scale for the' area through the se of similar or complementary materials, colors, or building forms and design detail 9. Development should designed to minimize detrimental impacts on surrounding properties, including, t not limited to, visual, noise, air quality and other environmental impacts. rategies for minimizing the impacts include protecting residential areas adjacen to commercial development through screening of circulation areas, loading are and trash collection points or other areas that could potentially be disruptive to the sidential character of the adjacent area. 1. Circulation. C. Commercial Development Performance S .a. Limit egress and ingress to comm cial areas to common entrance points. Orient most of the vehicular access fr side streets rather than directly from major arterial. b. Separate vehicular and pedestrian circulatl n systems should be provided if possible. Pedestrian linkages between uses the cornmercial areas should be provided. In shopping centers, provide se arate pedestrian walkways from parking areas to the major commercial te nts. Whenever possible, parking lots should be designed to separate vehic r circulation routes from parking aisles. 2. Architeciural Design. a. Large buildings should be designed in such a manner to 1Joid excessive mass and bulk. This can be accomplished by dividing the uilding form, varying the height of the roof structure and by creating offsets i he exterior walls. b. The lower floors of commercial structures should not have blank ails. Windows, trellises, wall articulation, and entrances can provide relief a expansive wall surfaces. Includes Amendments as of July 1, 2005 Chapter 17.0B - 19 c.. Upper portions of multistory commercial structures can be stepped-back to reduce the bulk and mass of the buildings and to preserve pedestrian scale. '-....; d. Long unarticulated walls should be avoided. Wall planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty (50) feet with an offset or enhanced architectural articulation. 3. Pedestrian amenities in commercial developments should be provided to enhance the opportunities for pedestrian circulation and social activities. Strategies to achieve this high degree of pedestrian orientation and activity i elude, but are not limited to, the following: i. Orient the design of the buildings to the scale of pedestrian. First loor uses should be primarily retail commercial, restaurants, or public e areas. Windows and door entrances should be located on the gr nd floor to encourage pedestrian activity. Large expanses of unin rrupted wall surfaces should not be permitted. ii. vered or enclosed walkways between the buildings on the iii. Provide pede ian plazas and sidewalks of sufficient width adjacent to buildings alon with amenities such as special lighting, interesting paving materials, ndscaping benches and other street furniture. b. Whenever possible, new stru ures should be clustered. This creates plazas or pedestrian malls instead 0 ows of commercial or "Strip commercial." Separate structures can be link with arcades. trellis or clearly defined walkway. ',"-./ c. Minimize conflicts between pedestria and vehicular traffic as much as possible by orienting pedestrian circula n areas parallel with the flow of traffic through the parking areas. d. Loading facilities shall not be located in front 0 tructures without screening. These facilities are most appropriately located the rear of the structures where screening can be minimal or not needed. e. Open space areas should be concentrated or c1ust ed into larger more meaningful spaces at areas of significant activity, rather small areas of low impact or on the periphery of the site. ......." 4. Compatibility. When a commercial structure is located adjacent to . neighborhood additional setbacks from the residentially zoned ar required. Multistory buildings may be stepped back to preserve the sc adjacent low rise structures. . Includes Amendments as of July 1, 2005 Chapter 17.08.20 D. Industrial Development Performance Standards. 1. Circulation. a. The circulation plan for an industrial development should clearly differentiate circulation plans for employees, visitors, truck traffic, loading areas and pedestrian circulation. Facilities should be provided, when appropriate, for access to bus routes, bus stops. . c. icycle parking areas should be provided for employees. ated walls should be avoided. Wall planes should not extend in ection for greater than fifty feet without an offset. d. Wa ways and paths should be provided opportunities for walking or jogging for e loyees. . 2. a. b. and roof forms, and distinctive windows patterns. c. Blank wall elevations auld be avoided on street frontages. d. Highly reflective surfaces e discouraged especially at the ground level. e. Wall materials should be s ected that are resilient to damage from machinery. f. If rolling shutter doors are require ,the doors should be mounted on the inside of the building to create an unc ttered appearance from the exterior. 3. Site Planning and Design. a. Placement of structures which creates opp unities for plazas, courts or gardens, lunch areas for employees with amen 'es such as outdoor seating and garden areas. b. Design features which contribute to the design cha cter of a project may include: ceremonial entrance drives, enhanced vi 'tor parking areas, highlighted visitor entrance areas, decorative pede rian plazas and walkways, focal landscape treatments, site sculptures, emp ee recreational facilities (exercise courses, jogging paths). c. In order to provide security, lighting should be provided at minimum illumination of one. footcandle across parking areas and two footc ndles at entrances. Lighting fi?<tures should be shielded to confine the sprea flight to adjoining properties. The design of the lighting fixtures shou be compatible with the architecture of the building. '-- Includes Amendments as of July 1, 2005 Chapter 17.08 - 21 d. Loading areas should generally not be located in the front of the building where it is difficult to adequately screen the loading areas from public view. These areas are most appropriately located in the rear or side of the property so that the loading docks and doors are not directly in the public view. ---- e. When walls or fences are necessary in the frontage of the property to conceal storage and mechanical equipment areas, walls should be architecturally treated on both sides and should be designed to complement and blend with the architectural design of the building. i. Long expanses of fencing or walls should be avoided unless offsets are provided, height variations, and combinations of materials are used to avoid monotony. Landscaping along the fences and at specific pockets should be provided. ii. Screening for outdoor storage should be a minimum of eight feet and a maximum of twelve feet high depending on the height of the material being screened. Exterior storage should be in the portions of the site leastvis,ible from public view. iii. Chain link fencing with wood or metal slatting between the links is acceptable fofareas that are not visible from the street. iv. When screening is required, a combination of screening techniques may be used, including solid masonry walls, landscaped berms and landscaping. -. f. Mechanical or other utility equipment shall be screened whether it is located on the roof, side of building or on the ground. The method of screening shall be architecturally integrated in terms of materials, color and form. Roof top equipment should:be integrated into the design of the building. 4. Compatibility. Where industrial. uses are adjacent to nonindustrial uses, appropriate buffering techniques such as increased setbacks. screening;berms and landscaping must be provided to mitigate any negative effects of industrial operations. E. Additional Performance Standards for Office Buildings in the Business Park (BP) and Light Industrial (L1) Zones. In order to encourage desirable characteristics of these zones, multiple free standing office buildings must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding scale. Performal1ce.standards to achieve this include but are not limited to the following: . 1. Larger single and multi-tenant office buildings are preferred. 2. If multiple freestanding office buildings on.a single site are proposed, they should be clustered aroundacourtyard.or common area sufficient to retain a pedestrian scale and ,to . prevent lQl1g'!barrack.like" rows of buildings. 3. The site shpuld..bedesigned with features that reinforce the visual and spatial relationship ofeach.buildil1gand courtyard area, such as the use of decorative paving, landscaping, and pedestrian amenities that complement the architectural design of the buildings. ,.0_" Includes Amendments a501 July 1, 2005 Chapter 17.08 - 22 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 15,2006 Harmony Linton TITLE: Assistant Planner Planning Application No. PA05-0139 is a Development Plan to construct a two-story 18,680 square foot office building on 1.41 acres located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop o Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: I:8l Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial I:8l Categorically Exempt (Section) 15332 Infill Development (Class) . 32 o Notice of Determination (Section) o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: James Horecka Date of Completion: May 5, 2005 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: March 15, 2006 General Plan Designation: Industrial Park (IP) Zoning Designation: Light Industrial (L1) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant, Previously Graded North: South: East: West: Existing fueling facility Existing office building Murrieta Creek Existing industrial building Lot Area: 1.41 acres (gross) .99 acres (net) Building Summary: Proposed 18,680 square foot, two-story building Building Height: 34 feet Total Floor Area/Ratio: .30 Landscape Area/Coverage: 10,016 square feet /23.34% Parking Required/Provided: 50 spaces required / 55 spaces provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. Planning Application No. PA05-0139 is a Development Plan to design and construct a two- story 18,680 square foot office building on 1.41 acres located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer loop. The Development Code requires office buildings that are less than 50,000 square feet to be approved, conditionally approved or denied by the City Council. In order to move the application up to City Council, the Planning Commission will need to provide a recommendation. . A Development Plan application was submitted on May 10, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on June 23, 2005. Staff worked with the applicant through several conceptual reviews of the plans to achieve a design that could be supported by staff. The applicant resubmitted revised plans on January 12, 2005. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 ANALYSIS Site Plan The project conforms to the development standards for the Light Industrial (L1) zoning district. The building setbacks meet the minimum requirements of the Development Code and the 0.30 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of .40 for this zoning district. The proposed 19.47 percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40 percent. The proposed building is located on the corner of the site near the Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop intersection. The parking has been positioned on the interior of the site to the rear of the building. This allows the building to screen a portion of the parking lot. The proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site, as well as for emergency vehicle access. Architecture The original building proposed consisted of an exterior with a plain convex treatment at the corner of Diaz Road and Slackdeer Loop. The building had an ogee patterned cornice and diamond accents on the wall planes. All of the windows were the same size and gave the building a squatting appearance. Furthermore, the stone treatments on the pop-outs were approximately 30 inches high from ground level. Staff was not in support of the architecture that was provided in the initial submittal, but has worked with the applicant to achieve a mutually acceptable design. Staff feels that the current concave appearance with enhancements better meet the intent of the Design Guidelines and the Performance Standards within Section 17.08.070 of the Development Code. The building will be constructed with a wood frame, and the main walls will consist of an exterior cement and lath system. The concave treatment and pop-outs work together to break up the wall planes of the' building. The building design includes pergolas with precast Tuscan style columns at both the front and the rear to tie the project together, and the building cornice is now proposed to have a cove profile. The windows have been lengthened at the ground floor within the pop-out areas and arch elements have been added to the second story windows within the pop-out elements. Additional stone veneer has been added to now reach the second level and add a more enhanced appearance and to improve on the original squatting effect. The raised stone continues around both sides of the building and onto the rear enhanced corners. The exterior stairway which leads up to the second floor has been revised from the original semicircular plainer layout to feature a more cove motif in order to blend with building. LandscapinQ The landscaping plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and . Design Guidelines. The project proposes to landscape 10,016 square feet or 23.34 percent of the site. This exceeds the minimum 20 percent minimum landscaped area required in the Light Industrial (L1) zone. The project provides landscaping around the perimeter of the site with a 20-foot landscaped setback along Diaz Road, and a ten-foot landscaped setback along Blackdeer Loop. Varied landscaped setbacks are proposed around the entire building footprint. An outdoor eating area is provided under the pergola at the rear of the building. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and soften building elevations. At the southeast corner of the building, a raised planter with stone veneer G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 will be planted with 36-inch box Australian Tea tree to punctuate the concave curve of the building and add a focal point for this view of the project. A total of six London Plane trees, five Red Crepe Myrtle trees, 19 Fern Pines. and 16 Flowering Pears have been placed around the perimeter of the site and building. Additionally, six Queen Palms have been placed at the rear of the building. Access, Circulation and ParkinQ Access to the proposed building will be provided from a 24-foot wide drive aisle off of Blackdeer Loop. The project requires a minimum of 50 vehicle parking spaces and 55 have been provided. In addition, four motorcycle spaces and four bicycle spaces have also been provided. A loading space has been provided at the rear of the building meeting the requirements within 17.24.060 of the Development Code. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be Categorically Exempt from further environmental review per Class 32, Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Development Plan PA05-0139 based upon the findings and with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for /ndustrial Park (IP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including professional offices, research and development, laboratories, light manufacturing, storage, industrial supply, and who/esale businesses as typical uses in the /ndustrial Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined and conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicab/e Building and Fire Codes. G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 2. The overall development ofthe land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Light Industrial Development Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page - 6 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution 06-_ - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Draft City Council Resolution 06-_ G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 , \ \ - \\ '\ , , .~ "- " ~ / /~ /' ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:IPlanning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 --_.._-_.~~~----_._------- .------..-------.---.---..--.-------.-. .---..---.-----.---.---.----.------- BEI~1SEi :xII;I puR"- ^ 6e9E2-:J. asua::lf1 96S26 'Y.J .~.....~ '~5 ~ 2062E ~::::J3.l.IH::::JHV "VTV "'o'>D3HOH "3 53WW IOIEiS2Ei "Oll..L.llc..nlg' 'QI...-.::.alLLla.L 1:Soo,. ~ela SiioE:..... ~ SSOEt;.o) fiulPllns a:JUl(] N\aN HV~I^ DIU vzv-1d.. ~ : ~ !! ~-i -~ -~ :- ~ ~ ~ i .flU i t ~ ~ ~ IS s' ~ ~~<i~~ ~~~~~ ~: c.i ~ ,,; - ~ ll.....;!' " ~::t:: II: ~ :Wl e ~~,;, ,;-.. ,,=" ~;;fI;~" j':'1 ",'- t:l:til! l:ill '~n.; ~ ~ f~ ~ ",Hi,' . .j Of!.! . a fi ~ :: " , i " . . ~ ia ,; . ~ ",u ",.. !I~" '.; . ~ , f ~oI..<> ,:. ::~ ~~ -.-.' t: ..,,"'.... !i ,:~~ ~i! i!~ ;#.!l~ o:l.a:F .it! l;:llc& :=~ ~;~...... ;:. ~:-~: "I' ~.. - . . t . 0., ~..~ tia! I ~!i ~:iS ~"~ !"l' ~ ., H:; ., ,. .." ill. "..." 0 ~;i1 _ l"l~~~~x~r~ I=..~ ~"'io;:;;' 4i~~ ~~~3i",i !i!_~ ;I~~!I! .k!;!!!5 ~.~-ijd. i2~E;:~" i~!i'~"J<"! oi"'~'''i li a J& r i5 ~ ~ ~ ~'I- 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~!.d 9 ~ 'l~!'l""" -'0' ."""., ~"'~3i '.i:!~"'giil1~i~~~~i~ !,! ~l!! ~ !,ll ~ !,'! WF l! i II Ii . _.... T'" ",..,.., :i! L L L :i. "'.. ~..... @.. oil';..": .. r9,;!!J!:te:icJ!~tir:R=~:U~~~ x~g=::::t.t;; Z :: Q Z <<zr- -( Oz('l JIll<r-(~ w::! -I:I'I _Nz<{-lt<l I-zlllzllll ziii>It:NO -(.I-(O~fii ~.::-(~~! 1l.1ll~<{ox ~"::JUlll<{ z-( .a::lI.. ,-IlIIl- o UJ It:zI-{-(oa W{I-W III ~ .~IO~~ Q3Z0~~ o....ol-~ ~:zZI It oOQ ~ gUjii -( It: ! .. ~1 ~~ ~ ~ ~.;g z! ..~ 11" ~ lFl! j. (! :;;:...:: 0 ~ l< ~ ~ ~ ~i~ili~~ U' ~ ~ ~ :.. sgflu;!o ...,.., ~.. :i!:;si>- leU L L" ~ i"'r...",,,.. ..~qli ..~ '" i3" 0 .!! t L~ ~: ~~ i!!; l"'.' 0., _;!J; _ :i iI ~ .. ------- ------- . ~ : . . ~ ~ <. : ~ ..-~ -. Z $- ~ " :~. "'l:Y . ~.. ... . ~ , '" 1 , ; t,; ~~ ~ . ." . ." ~ , ~ t . ~ ~: u , ~~~ < 0 ;t > ;' . %Q ;oi I~ . ~ ., :'.~ i r~ .v, ~." .c g> I\J~ I ~ <n . t ~ o x '" oJ I- o z I- oJ >L Z <: .J 0. '" o o .J lL .. ~ , z <: .J 0- '" o o -' lL l- f< o I- '" o z o u w '" f- '- W U ZZ <{O -,u- '- N Z~ "0: OiJ)" Ow' ..10"- lL _ -<(d~ "z< I-i=M x<{ w" f- .. :J .-' c! BElV926-1S6 ~ puz mtD^ 6B9E2-:n a5UiDf1 96S26 \1:1. ."""1-=-r'VA ~S ~ 2062E: .L::J3.LIH::JMV 'VTV "V>D3HOH '3 53Mtr oGS26 ~~III..LAcy.111E!3 ~121":3al..l...la.L dDlT1 ...aa~I;!!IB SIOEt:>- ll5I' SiSOEt>-) fiUIPII"a a::JIJJ(J N\aN ..V.J.SIA DIM ~d.. <l Ij ~ ", " (! ti-~ -f~ ;- ~ ~ ~ Z ::: 9 z <<zr <{ Oz" 3w"-<{J- Ill::!-}:<< _Nz<{...lt<\ ""zWzllll Zjji>ll!l-lO <{J:{o:2!:iti g-,<{~~1. 1l..1ll~<{ox ~(l:Jow<{ "'zo( "O!IL ,-Il..J:JI. o 0" ~z:r<{<{<II w<{hll <II ~ .~IO':~ o3zo~i- OTO....:;1 ~"~5J II.. ouQ " . . <{ ~ 1. ~ IIi>" .. ~ a ~i~ 8;~ ::,' ~ f'i~ fo~ ! . ; ~;~ ~~~ .... ~:l!:~~ ~"= ! s~g~tg~~ I i i ~ ~:~:s: ~">!ii~ . , i;~~ ;."'~ ~~~~~ ;~~ .. ..~ .~ :lt~ on~r;r~~4 ~2.. u:r..:J'....;~~~~ ~~f ....~<O:~..<O::I""i! '". gl!::;I"~~~f" ~I!,~ ,.Rl.. .d ~=:i~I:il~ tr:l:i III "'....g<'!<J <1:.,0: c..:! 1.1::5: ~ gE<l:O L!l<~ ~!Ii:: ~~~!l~~::~ ~!:i)5 ~!"'~;:.~2!~~?i~ .... ~! f~e ,...<:18 t: ~ o~~~to"g~<>"E~ ~ll<>tl""ut~<<>OtQ :i! &d@""'u~ ~ ~ 1l' o . i ! ~~ ~.. l:...bl~ ~<.,,~ <O:o-!o"" ~~ ijf ~ '" ~. t: ~ 1> " " c;~.. ~ ~ ;~ !-:l' ~!.. ~ I'l~tt ~ '< "~~ ~ ~ :il r- < ':g, Q~~ t: ~ z e: Q,o'Ij ,..,. ~ . i;l!:~ ~ ; g : ~~ ij.. ~ ...l,<~ ~ 5 Zg~"'t:~ !l,,' <{;_~"x i~~"'i~ I" ,,--""f;!! l'i lL~.~~~ g i ffi~"~ i. O!:i!;:;:1;1~~ '1. "' ,.,., ~: ~ !hi ;~ : ~1 I~ [j~ ~ :;~ ~ .. '. ." " .... .0 'I ~i:; I ~E (~' t o u. ~ < u . Q % ., W f- a z >- W >L Z -{ -' 0- 0. a a ll' In 2 . ~ z -{ -' 0- 0. a a ll' BEl~lS6 'XJil::f plJIi. t\ 6EI9E2-':l* a5Ui:Of1 96S2G V:J .co-:JC:>OO......~ ..iIraLIs ~ 2062E .L ::J 3 .1. I H ::J l:I V "VTV .V>D3HOH "3 53W\fr OEiS2Ei .1211U-1cy.lliG-:- ell'"l3al'-L.I~..L 000, ...Jaap>pIl3lIEl SI02i>- [!il SiSiOEt>-J flUIPUna 8::JWO nV.LS1A. DIU ^A8N "\f.Z"\r1dn " Q . " . . rl ~-: u . -r~ ;- ~ ~ ~ 111 <( ~m x- O. ~ o~ o. ,.. ? . _W < '" w. - "3 " W .. . ~. :i;":!" , .- e . . ~~ .3 ". <. S S ". "" OW o~. ~ . ~f) 3 x< " . 0 <. ~ 0 ~ .' .- e :!!:f ~:f W .. .' W .; - " <" . 3 . ". "" 0 0 0 '0 '0 e 0 e . X . ez ez ~~ ~:;i~. Z< Z< W. .,jl1lm , - "' . e 'e' We "We ~Iii iK~Pi' ~~~ <0< .g ......,s 30 <gU :t~~ tl~3 ~~8 3" ,.. z......... ffi......... 2:il'-!9 eWO <"" O!",O!: hDi!;; <xo wXO 0<< XL< nO ..0 OW. ow. @ @i @ @ ,. ~ l' '" ." ~ !.: ~ " ~ I/o '" -; , l- a' '. z~ o~ j:~ <('~ >19 w ~~ oc u. " 0 0 " ~ " . 0 : " . . , g . - 0 0 0 .< ~ CO .. w. ww "< "" .0 j::~ ~. . . -~ ~. Zo iiia Oe .z Ii- i:ii: ~eg -8 <:ilUo.:: UIIt:~ i!;lltw ;g~g .o~ ozo <," 00< 30_ .0_ 0 G .~ ~ ~ ~ -<:. ~ ~ ~ . ~.. I! & rl ~ ~ ~~5; i!:""j ~iiil~ ..":l!l ".. 0....... W Z ;: 9 :;( ~ g~r; ~ ~Ulr<{J. ~ ~~:i'{J~ t-zlllzllll Ziii>lI!NO <{r<(O!;fi g..;(~~.L lI..lll~<{ClX ~03UIU<{ ,~~:rtl.. o U" ffi~t~<{: ~.~dlt=:; 03:Z0~':' g!~~:;t 0 G':""OO' Z .. ClU2 1U ~ ~ ~ " W J .. 2 c ... .... .~~ ."" ~::~ .o("t: " < ~> ~ ~R "(11<1 t~~ ~~ ..<'<:( t-~1. ~~~( ~g~ o.o~ "11' .... "I.' :o~~ ~ _..:41 ..~ ~Oii n! """"Q,;rl '~"i""'!'" :~~~. :~ ~-"''':. ...,a,:'-R"-<- ~~~:... :jf !ill-:! i ~~1~~~ *~~~j: .,..... Oli _~ :l ~ ~~f~: ~!l:~i~ ~N~~il~ (3) ri <Ii.... . , z o i= <( > W -' w o z w 11 z ;; I- "' W 3 z o i' <( > W .J W o z w 11 z ;; I I- OC o z .. ~ . , :.( N <( J lL 1: o OC U. 3 W '> z o i= <( > W J W 11 z ;; I- "' W 3 ~--~-----------------~-----,--------------------~-------------------._----------- ---_.----_._._-,--------------~-~~----------- BEU>-926-156 ~ pt.:: ,oA 6B9E2":J' asua::J(l 96S26 "-l'~-=-f""'6.~i'~5:lf:lD1Jp1eH 2062E .1. ::J 3 .1. I H ::J 1:1 V 'VTV 'V>03HOH-3 53l1Wr I . < g ~ . I ClEiS2Ei ~1g1u...Jc:y.II' ~1Q1.-.::.a.........iSI.L doo, ..saap>pQIB Sl':"'C:t:>o: l'!5I' !:is(]Et:>o) fiulPllna a::JWD /\/\aN . ..V.1.51^ 011:1 VZ'l71dn " . . . , " I! ~-l -j ~~ :- . , . ~ 0( ~ lD-. 8. ". I !i:~ <( 9, tll:1 0; u. l . z :: Q z "zr -( OZI'1 .. JWlr-(} Ul 1Il:J -J:" I- ~NZ'!t.J(f\ 0 I-ZIUZIllI Ziii>Il!NO Z -(:r-(O;?;iii ~~-(~~! }- II.lll~-(OX Ul ~ll:JUlll-( "- z{ ;UII. Z ,-II.Xu.. o OJ 0 a:::zI<{<l:1I) i= lll-(I-Ill II) z <<lilt=::; 0 330 UI Ul o ZO-(" g~~r .. .. ~ o3Q .. J . . 0 < . ' 0' 0 .. b '- . , Ul .J 0 0 I' ~ . ~ Z . 0 , ;:: U Ul .. .. .. 0 0' U . , , ~ :i. 1jl1 . i I .H , : : f. i ~ : ; " .. li -c.. rr e:: i~i!~ ~ ~l~i i!i~~g i~ ~~ Eo~;p .(.. I! l! ~ 15:i: Q" ~ ::i! 55! . : a I ~ !; ii33~~i3"=~ " 0 Q 9 "i ~ "'!! ~ ; z Illliil_>-,.":i !=U:q'il' illi~~~~~i~i Gri ,(i.4":.o'!i . ~ ~ ~ ~ ",:i. ~ ~ ~:;: .. ~:: ~ :... .., t ~~ I~il : ~.~ _~i " ~ g ~ 2 ~ " c:i .. ~ :l: 0 . Q lo '" ~ :;or :~::~ ~~ ~~: ~ !!!!S v 0" ....L.. .. .."''< I' ..".. Il ~'f~i!8g .;e ~:.." i ~S: o o&~ ....or ".~ ~~a" .. "p~ r :8" "'.... ;..~ "'.(~a ~ 1!"5 ~a .",orE~:~l u~t _fl:~ = ~i.. .. S .. ;r /11" Q: z .. .. li!! .... z .. c:i ~ .. r" ~~~ i;~~~~!~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~!~i-:f ~,,~ :E~t:~i~_&~!~f"::..~.~~:..~~c ..~~ 2~i ~...~ift(~..~i~~~5L-;f..~> !~L 'k~'~~=~ t~~3~",~~~~~..~:~g ~~~ ~!~!~!J~!~r:ii~E~g~2~!i~!i ~:.. ~~~D~.~~~~..~ ~~~=i~: ~~D ~~i~.~~~:~~gC:1i~~~;..i~~:r=~~i .,u....~.....l.E"J%.. DO"E .~~.i~- . ..l,!.\ ,.!....;;,...". '33~ I!l;"v~ ,,~;uu"~l!l!~r:n:< 2"'II!ltil;...... ~~~~~j2i.i8~f~~f~~~~3Z!~i~l~!~ ~i~i~iia~R~~g~~~~g~;:i~~~:~oi~~i; " " " 0- "' @ 0-- "' "' @ " ; ; " " "' "' "' 0 ~ 3 3 3 W W U U iL f1..~ iL "- "- 0 ~~ 0 * ~:..~ .,'1, ,,! j"''''> ::":;.:: 0-'- 0--- 0- 0- C C . 5 0- 0--- z o j:: .. W U w "' r ~ ~ " U o ~ '" o z w ~ z o ~O- Mo--- .. .. .. o "' u ~~ " d .- r !i , I !, , \ .' h I ,~ -, ! I k~ . 11 , i~ ~ ~~ !~ !a . :~~., gr ' I .; ! i ! ~faa 1/ !t~ ~~s '<... .. ~ lit " 'r r ' ~ ! ~ il~ d'l i i. illl ; ~ I~ !!!!~ ~ 1~'I' ..l!ji Q,;~ [~~ iv !!' ! 11' i li; I. ~ ~l!! II! "" tt'';' it ..~~~ ffi Ill.! ~ Il~"l ~; I ~~Ii Ii 9 ~ I 1-, ~ 0..... g-~ 1!i "~i:?" H ~ ~ !,I~i ~I ~l!i@! ~1i ~!.~ I., ~l,"' ,. ~ iJ'l ~a.l I~~ ~ 'il , w "' hl 111 ( I!;I I ! J , Sf l.: j "~-r (!) ~ Q :::::! :::J CQ ~s Q::a LJ.:~ O~ S::~ ~. ~ I ~ ~~ ~ u:l ~ . ,....;; ~ , --- -__ u --- 'I /-.!--.._-~ \/ --- --- --- --- <( ! -II '! . \ 'I , I ....., ~ Ii I i ~I I 'I' m Z ~ Q. ~ "' , i ~ i ---- ~"\~- /\I",J\'?' \~/'1.:t ll~ - ~ ., I s c .. " , , ~ ! , 0 5 g i I i I i I j ; \ ~i ~ fO hi o . ,; 2: I IE" llO:!j \ ' , I I , I I ~ ~ - , - o g ~ , 3 <( o~ ~~ ~. ",<l: ~~ &3 -~- ~- o . ~ ~ ~ ~ , 3 o . ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~;' . ? , ~ ~ ~ ~ ...;!!l' 1'-'" f ! l~ ~i j "-~-; I- i ! . ~ . i . , ~ , . ! I ! , , ~! I I~ ! ' ! I . -1- :>..<: " ~~ " ~~ " ~ ~<: I; ufo 8:~ ~ I I I ""I ......""'i'......~".f-'O':'~...'l~.-'...,~.''f'\..........? ~""Jli>/O-"'(''''lOOOUY.l''''''''''Ji:J ~""'_"""P~S'<I,t ," 9NINNVld S3IJnI:)VJ NOIIV311:)3!:l . LtOll;>~u"~!I~o,goO 3N01031IH3NV 3d't'JSONVl dOO!lO VlJ8I'NH1V ~(BtI'n".l:)VJ/<<XIQ.a-<<,.,':.:,'::I_i(lClHol UZOIS'VHl<r.nf:J'K>'aaOO<<XJ3l',:--.'tvtlTlV.lliUlCfttlt' ~~~ >> I '" ~ -" __ 'I' ...:; d~ ..]'B ti.J{i zJ. i]:liw -mO ~1i.g ~ '0 ~ ti'M"f13ZN311 3'aII ~ 'M CB:i:f1V ~ ONIOlIfl8 3OWO - V.I.StA 0Ill VZVld ,""""" !;ooZ31'J3B Z <( ..J 0.. 0' II- ~ z! , ( I ~i I"~I~ l ~ I !! ~ ilil! !' @ ~, , .. . i ,! ! ! l ! <(, ; ~ 5 I !I!I ~ ~ tel ~'" -I' Ill! I > -l~ill ~.K - >-1 t;;t:t:to:t: iliilM I i!l!! 0:- s i a g R ~ ~!i <(~ ~ ii a i : z. ~ -'''; ~ -' Ii!: Iii -! ~ , :::2;, Ime ;s ~ e!iil!l'~ :Ji '. Ii$ . ~ i i d; 'hi ,I, ~I ~~!! ~ "''' of.. 0.., ~ nih I , ! 1 , t. " .' " " " " " " I II !! ~ 1 r--H--n-n------------ I, I , I ! ! . i ! ;. j;.~ . j ~i i i . ~~ i ; , .. ! , , i . ~ f , I ~; . . I , l l~ . a . I I < I I g H . ! <" ! ; , .1 ii, ~ii~!I!i 1 ~ , I .. , , g I , l ~ , l Ii ..44..44.... a ! _! ~H~~~~~ - , " iii * p I w I .."..~~- ~:afi:;::!.'!O:~ ~ I 0 ~ , , . ~ H~ ~ I w i. ". . ~~u.... ~ i i I . -""-,,...... , . . 1 i i i , ! i 1 i'l ! . ! I , I g II ! I , i I ~ . . II . I . 1'1 , ! ! i ! ! ~ I , i i I U~ i I z. <! <,:. i ~ 3 - .. ~.: 0: <! I ~in ~ii-I~~ . 2.000 '0@0 I f ~H!l , ~i 000 e " 0 . , I " I ! i I 1 , 1i iJ Ii <JltO!:lZVlQ ----- o ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ G:\Planning\2005IPA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DPIPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05- 0139, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 18,680 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.41 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND BLACKDEER LOOP Section 1. James Horecka, filed Planning Application No. PA05-0139 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0139 was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application No. PA05-0139 on March 15, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. Section 4. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA05-0139 subject to the conditions after finding that. the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA05-0139 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. Section 5. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 6. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. 05-0139 (Development Plan) hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 O.E and F of the Temecula Municipal Code: Development Code (Code Section 17.04.010.Fl A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City; The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for Industrial Park (IP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including professional offices, research and development, laboratories, light manufacturing, storage, industrial supply, and wholesale businesses as typical uses in the Industrial Park designation. The proposed project is consistent with the use regulations outlined and conditioned by the Building and Safety Department and the Fire Prevention Bureau to comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\Planning\Draft PC Reso.docl The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing the Lightlndustrial Development Performance Standards of the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 7. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to have no significant environmental effects and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 8. Recommendation. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No.PA05-0139, a request to construct a 18,680 square foot two-story office building on 1.41 acres with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A of the City Council Resolution, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 9. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of March 2006. Ron Guerriero, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] G:\Planning\2005\P A05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista D~lanning\Draft PC Reso.doc2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ") COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA . ) I Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 06-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of March 2006, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: G:\Planning\2005\PA05-0139 Plaza Rio Vista DP\Planning\Draft PC ResQ.doc3 Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary Chairman Guerriero thanked the applicant for the unique architecture. MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation as presented. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff who was absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING APPLICATION NO. PA05- 0105, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 11,271 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON .987 ACRES LOCATED AT 41755 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH 7 Planninq ADPlication No. PA05-0139. a Development Plan. submitted bv James Horecka. to construct a two-storv 18.680 square foot office buildinq on 1.41 acres. located on the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Blackdeer Loop Assistant Planner Linton provided the Planning Commission with a staff report (of written material). At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. James Horecka, project architect, spoke in favor of the proposed project, and advised that he would be in agreement of the Conditions of Approval. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Telesio thanked the applicant and staff for delivering a great product to the community. Cornmissioner Harter concurred with comments made by Commissioner Telesio and voiced his enthusiasm for the proposed project. MOTION: Commissioner Harter moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Cornmissioner Chiniaeff who was absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-026 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA05- 0139, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 18,680 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.41 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND BLACKDEER LOOP R:IMinutesPCI031506 5 ITEM NO. 19 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ 1112.. tf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Proposed Commission Guidelines At the request of Council Member Naggar and Council Member Washington PREPARED BY: Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the proposed guidelines for the appointment of City Commissioners, for inclusion in the Handbook for Commissions, Committees and Boards. BACKGROUND: Council directed staff to further define and enhance the process for the appointment of Commissioners. Term limits were discussed by the City Council, but not generally supported. Alternate Commissioners were also discussed, but are not being recommended, due to legal concerns on the Planning Commission and the lack of continuity for the other Commissions. Staff is recommending that the following guidelines be included in the Handbook for Commissions, Committees and Boards: o Establish a formal interview process with the Mayor and Council Liaison with standard core questions for both new candidates and incumbents o Encourage letters of recommendation and/or references with the application process o Encourage Council Liaison to attend Commission meetings to develop an overview of the incumbent Commissioner's performance o Review absentee record of all Commissioners as part of the incumbent performance review, with the understanding that if three absences occur within a 12 month period, the Council Liaison to that Commission will be notified for further review. If these absences are not acceptable to the Council Liaison, a recommendation to the City Council will be made by the liaison for removal from the Commission. This is in addition to the existing ordinance which stipulates that should any commission member be absent from any three consecutive meetings of the commission, without excuse acceptable to the city council, that member shall vacate his or her seat on the commission. The Council may also wish to consider the following previously discussed options. After serving two full terms, appointment to subsequent terms should only be given consideration under the following guidelines: D The incumbent shall have served as Chair or Vice-Chair of their respective Commission. D The incumbent shall have served on at least one sub-committee of their respective Commission. D The incumbent can only be appointed to a third term and beyond with a 4/5ths vote. The City Council also asked staff to define the qualities and attributes of an effective Commissioner. These attributes could be published in the announcement of a vacancy, as well as used by the City Council in the appointment process. These attributes include the following: D Informed citizen (someone knowledgeable about local affairs) D Ability to have a good rapport with citizens D Genuine concern for the community as a whole D Be a good listener D Served in another capacity prior to commission service (i.e. volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.) D Relates well to other people, including other commissioners D Has the ability to accept decisions not of their own personal view if that is the will of the majority Staff also recommends the implementation of a formalized orientation program as follows: D Provide a thorough review of the Handbook for Commission, Committees and Boards, including the Brown Act. D Povide more detailed orientation related to specific Commission issues, to be addressed by the lead department. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Current Handbook for Commission, Committees and Boards CITY OF TEMECULA HANDBOOK FOR COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS THE COMMISSIONER'S ROLE AND AUTHORITY The primary role of the City Committees, Commissions and Boards is to encourage increased public input and citizen participation in the determination of City policies and procedures. City Committees/Commissions/Boards are not involved in the administration or operation of City departments. Committee/Commission/Board members may not direct administrative staff to initiate programs, conduct major studies, or establish official policy without the approval of the City Council. However, City staff members are available to provide general staff assistance to Committees/Commissions/Boards. Despite Committees, Commissions, and Boards differing tasks, all share some basic responsibilities. Members need to stay informed on subjects of interest to their specific Committee/Commission/Board. The City Council of the City of Temecula encourages and provides opportunities for continuing education to assist the members of City Commissions in the conduct of their duties. Conscientious attendance is also a fundamental responsibility, as irregular attendance lessens one's ability to study all aspects of items under consideration. Three unexcused, consecutive absences constitute a vacancy of office. CommissionlHandbook RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR CITIZEN MEMBERS It is not appropriate for individual members to present their personal views or recommendations as representing the Committee/Commission/Board unless such body has voted to approve such action. Members expressing views not approved by the majority of a Committee should indicate their opinions are viewed as "private citizens." Individual opinions must be identified as such. Public statements should not include promises that may be construed to be binding on the Committee, City Councilor City staff. When making a public statement, members should indicate that Committee actions are recommendations and that final action will be taken by the City Council. Committee members may be selected on the basis of representing defined groups; however, each member should represent the overall "public good" and not an exclusive group or special interest. GUIDELINES FOR CITIZEN MEMBERS . Work to establish a good relationship with other committee members. The success or failure 01 committee efforts may be dependent upon the degree of cooperation evident among the individual members of the body. . Each member should keep in mind these important points: . Show respect for another's viewpoint. . Allow others adequate time to fully present their views before making comments. . Be open and honest. . Make new members welcome and help them become acquainted with their duties. . Strive to minimize political action among members. Commissionkiandbook 2 I. ROLE. AUTHORITY AND STAFFING OF COMMISSIONS The City Council is empowered to establish commissions and to appoint members to assist the Council in the conduct of City business. Members usually represent a cross- section of the community. No member of any commission shall be a City employee, nor shall any person be a member of more than one commission at anyone time. The primary role of any City Commission is to review and make recommendations to the City Council on matters within their scope of responsibility and to promote increased public input and citizen participation in the determination of City policies and program implementation. The specific role of City Commissions is basically to serve as a citizens' advisory to the City Council, focusing attention on specific program areas of the City. The City Council may authorize certain "commissions" to take final actions in prescribed areas, for example the Planning Commission is authorized to grant final approval of certain projects and is required to provide a recommendation to the City Council on other projects. In addition, staff may bring various projects to a commission for their review before taking that matter to the City Council for final approval. Boards, committees and commissions serve as a principal reviewing body for specific matters referred to them by the City Council. All decisions. however, are subiect to call UP and review bv the City Council. Commissioners should represent the general interest of the City as a whole and not specific program areas and their special interest groups. Appointments and Removals Chapter 2.40.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code, City Commissions Generallv provides that appointments are subject to the approval of a majority of the City Council. A majority of the council may remove an appointee for good cause. Rules of Procedure/BY-Laws Rules of procedure or by-laws for the proper conduct of business should be adopted. OrQanization and Officers As set forth in the by-laws, there shall be an annual election of a chairperson and vice- chairperson. The position of chairperson and vice~chajrperson should be rotated among members on an annual basis. The Chairperson The Chairperson is the key to the entire group process. The Chairperson must balance being strong enough to make certain the meeting is conducted in an orderly fashion and democratic enough to use the power and authority of the position wisely. The Chairperson's ability to handle meetings will have a significant impact on morale, operation and effectiveness. The Chairperson must make sure that discussions do not CommissionlHandbook 3 get sidetracked on minor issues and must have the ability to see the "whole picture". The most important duty of the Chairperson lies in his/her ability to find a common ground and achieve workable compromises if appropriate. The Chairperson must be able to represent the entire group to the City Council and community groups. Minutes Minutes shall be taken for all Commission, Committee and Board Meetings. The Council has provided that these minutes shall be "action minutes" and not "verbatim" whicn briefly describe the issues and actions taken. Minority opinions of members may also be recorded in the minutes if desired. Comments by all members on every agenda item cannot practicably be included in the minutes. Also, members abstaining for legal conflict of interest requirements are required to state their reason for recordation in the minutes. Minutes must be approved at a subsequent meeting and then become part of the City's official records in the office of the City Clerk. Development and Review of Commission Goals and Department Policies The City of Temecula prepares and operates on an annual budget cycle. Boards, committees and commissions are encouraged to annually review and comment on department programs and capital projects that may be related to their scope of interest. This evaluation is intended to focus attention on the overall program and service priorities and commission objectives; and is not intended to be an evaluation of the administration or operation of City Departments. Involvement in Administrative Matters Commissions should not become involved in the administrative or operational matters of City departments unless specifically provided in the prescribed powers and duties. Members may not direct staff to initiate major programs, conduct large studies or establish department policy without approval of the City Council. City staff assigned to furnish staff services shall be available to provide general staff assistance, such as preparation of agenda materials, general review of department programs and activities, to perform limited studies, program reviews and other services of a general staff nature. Commissions may not establish department work programs or determine department program priorities unless specifically authorized in their prescribed powers and duties. The responsibility for setting policy and allocating City resources rests properly with the City's duly elected representatives, the City Council, and cannot be delegated to an outside group, however capable and interested it might be. Communication with the City Council To avoid possible compromising situations, the invitation to individual commission members to address the Council on matters relating to their official capacity rests solely with the City Council. [t should be emphasized, additionally, that when a member is present at a Council meeting and is asked to address the Council on a matter, the member should represent the viewpoint of the commission as a whole (not a personal opinion), unless a proper qualification is made. CommissionlHClndbook 4 Workinq with Other Members Members should make every effort to uphold their reputation for honesty, fairness and openness with the citizens of the community. Each group will undoubtedly consist of diverse personalities; it is important that we work together to accomplish common goals. Workinq with Staff Commission members are individually appointed by the City Council. City staff assigned to work with the groups report to the City Manager, who in turn, reports to the City Council. A department director or administrator usually arranges staff support for each group. If a commissioner wishes to initiate a project that requires staff development, it is necessary that it be placed on the commission agenda for discussion and a recommendation to the City Council that the project be authorized. Only after City Council authorization may staff begin preparing the necessary reports and studies. Staff support also means facilitating operations. Staff is aware of their responsibilities, and the members should be aware of the time involved on the part of staff in preparing studies and reports requested. If friction develops, individuals should make every attempt to clarify differences and make certain that clear communication is taking place. The public meeting should not be used to express anger or disagreement. If differences cannot be resolved by this method, the Councilmember serving as Commission Liaison and/or City Manager should then be consulted in an effort to resolve the matter. Staff Reports to Council on Commission Actions There will be occasions when City staff will be required to prepare an agenda report on either a commission action or appeal for City Council review. In preparation of such a report the staff member should present both the staff position and the commission's position. The position of members not voting in the majority on an item should also be presented in the staff report if so indicated by the member. It is the desire of the City Council to have an opportunity to hear and consider all sides of an issue and alternative recommendations to assist in their decision-making process. Procedure for Handlina Public or Appeal Hearings In some instances, commissions will have to conduct a public hearing, either on a major issue of concern to the community or on a permit application or appeal of a staff decision. It is recommended that the procedure established by the City Attorney be followed at all times during the conduct of this kind of hearing. CommissionlHandbook 5 leqal Assistance Some commissions require the presence of a City Attorney. When there is doubt concerning the legality of an issue, the Attorney should advise members as to the legality of the proposed action. Great care must be taken in the maintenance of records of the proceedings when litigation is a possibility. The direction of the City Attorney should be followed closely. Remember the adage, "Discretion is the better part of valor", and when in doubt about the legality of a procedure, wait until the legal opinion is rendered. If necessary, a hearing may have to be continued until matters can be clarified. Counsel must control the circumstances surrounding a particular matter since he/she may be required to defend the action in court. Council Review of Action Most actions and recommendations of commissions may be appealed to the City Council for review and approval. Certain actions are final with the Commission with no right of appeal. Public Appearance of Members When a commission member appears in a non-official, non-representative capacity before any public or private body, the member shall not identify or disclose his/her membership on a commission. If a question of membership arises, the member shall indicate that he/she is appealing and speaking only as an individual. If a commission member appears as the representative of the applicant or a member of the public, the Political Reform Act governs this appearance, The City Attorney should be consulted. Members should take notice that the Brown Act makes punishable as a misdemeanor, the attendance by a member at a meeting at which action is taken in violation of the Brown Act. "Action taken" is defined to mean a collective decision, commitment or promise by a majority of the members of such a body when setting as a body, upon a motion, proposal, resolution, order or ordinance. Further, the Brown Act provides that the City can be enjoined by the courts from violating the Brown Act. fA summary of the major provisions and requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act is included in this handbook}. Commission Members Runninq for Elective Office Members of the City's commissions shall be permitted to retain membership on such appointive bodies while seeking any elective office. Members of appointive bodies shall not, however, use the meetings, functions or activities of such bodies for purposes of campaigning for elective office. CommissionlHandbook 6 Commission Positions on Ballot Proposals and LeQislation Commissions may review and make recommendations to the City Council on ballot proposals and legislation. The City Council shall review all such recommendations. Commission member shall only represent the majority position of the City Council on such matters unless speaking as an individual or indicating a minority opinion. CommissionlH!lndbook 7 Cbapter 2,40 CITY COMMISSIONS GENERALLY Sections: 2.40.010 2.40.020 2.40.030 2.40.040 2.40.050 Commission established. Number of members. Qualifications. Applications. Members-Appointment and removal. Term. Vacaudes. Meetings/quorum. Absence from meetings. Compensation. 2.40.060 2.40.070 2.40.080 2.40.090 2.40.100 ) 2.40.010 Commission established. There shall be established within the city a plan- ning commission. For purposes of state planning law, the planning commission shall serve as the planning agency, Wlless another official or body is specifically designated to perfonn that function or make a particu- lar decision as provided by ordinance of the city. Division of land use decisionmaking authority shall be as set forth in Ordinance No. 92~14. The city council may establish by ordinance and resolution such other commissions as it deems necessary. (Ord. 93-04! 10: Ord. 9\)-02 ! 1 (2.06.0 I 0)) 2.40.020 Number of members. Unless otherwise specifically provided, each commission shall consist of five members. (Ord. 90- 02! 1(2.06.010)) I 2.40.030 Qualifications. Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, or by ordinance or resolution of the city council, all members of commissions of the city shall, at all times during their incumbencies, be bona fide residents and registered voters of the city. No member of any commission shall be a city employee, nor shall any person be a member of more than one conunission at anyone time. (Ord. %-OS ! 2: Ord. 90-02 ~ 1 (2.06.030)) " 2.40.0 to 2.40.040 Applications. The city clerk shall maintain all applications submitted to the city for commission positions for a period of two years. (Ord. 90-02! 1 (2.06.040)) 2.40.050 Members-Appointment aDd removal. Members of each commission shall be nominated by an ad hoc committee of two council members subject to the approval of a majority of the city council. A majority of the council may remove an appointee for good cause. The chairperson and vice- chairperson of each commission shall be selected by a majority of the membership of that commission. (Ord. 2000-08 ~ 2: Ord. 90-02 ! 1 (2.06.050)) 2.40.060 Term. The tenn of each commission member shall be three years with staggered terms. lnitially, all five members may be selected at once. In order to achieve staggered terms, one member shall be appointed for a tenn of three years; two for tenns of two years; and two for tenos of one year. such terms to be determined by drawing lots. At the completion of any term, a commission member may be reap- pointed pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 2.40.050. (Ord. 90-02! I (2.06.060)) 2.40.070 Vacancies. If vacancies in any commission occur, other than by ex.piration of term, such vacanci~s shall be filled by appoinbnent for the unexpired portion of the term. (Ord. 90.02 ! 1 (2.06.070)) 2.40.080 Meetings/quorum. The city council shall establish meeting schedules for each commission by resolution. A quorum of three shall be required for the transaction of anybusiness. (Ord. 90-02 ~ t (2.40.080)) 2.40.090 Absence from meetings. Should any conunission member be absent from any three consecutive meetings of the commission, without excuse acceptable to the city council, that member shall vacate his or her seat on the cornmis- 27 (TCIIlCCIIla3-02) 2.40.090 sicn. The vacancy shall be fined in the same manner as any other vacancy. (Ord. 90-02 ~ I (2.06.090)) 2.40.100 Compensation. City commissioners shall receive monthly com- pensation as follows: Planning commission $50.00/meeting attended, Public traffic/safety commission 50.00/meeting attended, and Community services commission 50.00/meeting attended. (Ord. 01-t2 ! t: Ord. Ot-ll ! 1: Ord. Ol-OS ~ 2, 2001: Ord. 99-09 ~ 1: Ord. 96-09 ~ 2: Ord. 90-02 ~ t (2.06. toO)) ,. L lC i. I' ,. " (lemec1ll.3~) 28 Chapter 2.44 PUBLIcrrRAFFlC SAFETY COMMISSION* Sections: 2.44.010 2.44.020 2.44.030 2.44.040 2.44.050 2.44.060 2.44.070 Estahlished. Composition and membership. Terms of office. Time and place of meetings. Powers and duties. Public hearings. Staff assistance. . PriorordinanochirtOl}': 001.90-67. 2.44.010 Established. Pursuant to Section 2.40.010, there is created an advisory commission to the city council which shall be known as the Temecula public/traffic safety com. mission. (ani. 93-18. I (12.01.010): Ord. 92-171 I (12.01.010)) ) 2.44.020 Composition and membership. The pubIiC/traffic safety commission shall consist of five members appointed by the city council pur- suanlto Section 2.40.050. No officers or employees of the city or person under an employment contract subject to the jurisdiction of the city council shall be members of such commission. (Ord. 93.18 ~ 1 (12.01.020): ani. 92-17 . 1 (12.01.020)) I. 2.44.030 Terms of office. Tenus of office for public/l:raffic safety commis- sioners shall be three years with staggered tenus. Initially, all five members may be selecled at once. In order to achieve staggered tenos, one member shall be appointed for a tenn of one year, two mem- bers for terms of two years; and two members for terms of one year, such termS to be detennined by !he dlllwing of lots. Al the completion of any term a commission member may be reappointed pUl"SUant to the procedures set forth in Section 2.40.050. (ani. 93-18 ~ 1 (12.01.030): ani. 92-t7. 1 (12.01- .030)) , I. 2.44.010 2.44.040 Time and place of meetings. The public/traffic safety commission shall estab- lish a regular date, time and place for commission meetings, which shall be open to the public. Such meetings shall occur no less frequently than once a month. (Ord. 93-18 ~ t (12.01.050): ani. 92-t7 ~ 1 (12.01.050)) 2.44.050 Powers and duties. The public/traffic safety commission shall advise the city council on all matters subject to the jurisdic- tion of the council pertaining to the public and tnlffic safety. The duties of the pUbliC/traffic safety commission shall be established by resolution oithe cily council. (Ord. 93-18 fi I (12.01.060): Onl. 92- 17 11 (12.01.060)) 2.44.060 Public hearings. Whenever the commission detennines, by a two- thirds majority of those members present, that its deliberations with respect to a particular matter or matters would be substanfially aided by lhe preseo- tafion of testimony from the citiz.c.ns of the city, or of a certain area of the city, the commission may direct a public hearing be held concerning such matter or matters. Notice of such a hearing shall be provided by publication in a newspaper of general circulation published in the city. amI/or by posting the same in at least three public places, not later than seven days prior to the date of the hearing, Such hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the rules established for the conduct of hearings before the city council unless lhe council, by resolu- tion, shall othelWise provide. (Oed. 93-18 f 1 (12.01.070): Onl. 92-17 I t (12.01.070)) 2.44.070 SlatT assistance. The city manager shall ensure that adequate staff will be allocated to provide necessary technical and clerical assistance to the commission. (Oed. 93-18 ~ 1 (12.01.040): ani. 92-17 . 1 (t2.0I.040)) 29 (I'1:IIlllCUllS-~1 2.48.0tO Chapter 2.48 COMMUNlTY SERVICES COMMISSION Sections: 2.48.010 2.48.020 2.48.030 Established. Time and place of meetings. Powers and duties. 2.48.010 Established. There is established a Temecula community ser- vices commission. (On!. 93-Q6 t 1 (13.01.010): On!. 90-05 t I (13.10.010)) 2.48.020 Time and place of meetings. The time and place of the meetings of the Tem- ecula community services commission shall be established by resolution of the commission. (Ord. 93-Q6 t 1 (13.01.020): On!. 90-05 t I (t3.01.020)) 2.48.030 Powers and duties. The duties of the Temecula community services commission shall be eSlablished by resolution of lhe city council. (On!. 93-Q6 f I (13.01.030): Ord. 90- 05 f 1 (13.01.030)) (TemccalaS.~) l( , .' I I' I. ,. I. '" 30 SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT JANUARY 2006 The Ralph M. Brown Act. commonly referred to as the "Brown Act," is California's "sunshine" law for local government. It is codified in the Government Code begiIUling at Section 54950. In a nutshell, the statute requires local govenunent business to be conducted at open and public meetings, except in certain limited situations. The Brown Act is based upon state policy that the people must be informed so they can keep control over their government. Any gathering of three or more COWlcil members in person, or by serial discussions, or by telephone, or by cmail to "hear. discuss or deliberate" on matters within the jurisdiction of the city constitutes a meeting and requires compliance with the Brown Act. This paper briefly summarizes and discusses the major provisions and requirements of the Brown Act. All citations to "Section "refer to the Government Code. I. Application to "Legislatin Bodies" The requirements of the Brown Act apply to "legislative bodies" of cities and other local agencies. The term "legislative body" is defined to include the governing body of a local agency (e.g., the city council) and any commission, committee, board or other body of the local agency, whether permanent or temporary, decision making or advisory, that is created by formal action of a legislative body (Section 54952). Standing committees of a legislative body are subject to the requirements of the Brown Act if they have either a "continuing subject matter jurisdiction" or a meeting schedule fixed by formal action of the legislative body. Such standing committees exist to make routine and regular recommendations on a specific subject. They sU[\i'ive resolution of anyone task, and are a regular part of the govenunental structure. The Brown Act does not apply to an "ad hoc" advisory committee of a legislative body if the ad hoc advisory committee is composed solely of members of the body and it does not have a continuing subject matter jurisdiction or a meeting schedule fixed by formal action of a legislative body. Such ad hoc advisory committees generally serve only a limited or single purpose. They are not perpetual and they are dissolved when their specific task is completed. Ad hoc advisory and standing committees may, but are not required to, have regular meeting schedules. Even if a standing committee does not have a regular meeting schedule, its agendas should be posted at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. If this is done, then the meeting is considered to be a "regular" meeting for all purposes. If not, then the meeting must be treated as a "special" meeting, and all of the limitations and requirements for special meetings apply. The differences between regular and special meetings are explained in Parts VI and VII below. - 1 of14- co 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86~I04-1 Governing boards of private entities are subject to the Brown Act under certain circumstances. Specifically, a private entity's governing board constitutes a Brown Act legislative body if either of the following applies: (i) the private entity is created by an elected legislative body to exercise lawfully delegated authority of the legislative body; or (ii) the private entity receives funds from a local agency and the private entity's governing board includes a member of the legislative body who was appointed by the legislative body to the governing board as a full voting member (Section 54952). Finally, the Bruwn Act applies to persons who are elected to serve as members of a legislative body ofa local agency even before they asswne the duties of office (Section 54952.1). Under this provision, the statute applies to newly elected, but not-yet-swom-in, cOWlcihnembers. II. Definition of ~'Meetings" and Exceptions to Meetings The central provision of the Brown Act requires that all "meetings" of a legislative body be open and public. The Brown Act meaning of the term "meeting" (Section 54952.2) is a very broad definition that encompasses almost every gathering of a majority of legislative body members and includes: "any congregation of a majority of the members of a legislative body at the same time and place to hear. discuss. or deliberate upon any item that is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body or the local agency to which it pertains." [Emphasis added. ] In plain English, this means that a meeting is any gathering of a majority of councilmembers (or commissioners) to hear or discuss any item of city business or potential city business. A meeting occurs even ifno action is taken. There are six types of gatherings that are exceptions to the Brown Act's meeting definition and therefore are not subject to the statute. We refer to these exceptions as: (I) the individual contact exception; (2) the seminar or conference exception; (3) the community meeting exception; (4) the other legislative body exception; (5) the social or ceremonial occasion exception; and (6) the standing committee exception. Unless the gathering falls within one of these exceptions, if a majority of councilmembers (or commissioners) are in the same room and merely listen to a discussion of city business, then they will be participating in a Bwwn Act meeting that requires notice, an agenda, and a period for public comment. A. The individual contact exception Conversations, whether in person, by telephone or other means, between a legislative body member and any other person do not constitute a meeting (Section 54952.2(c)(I)). However, such contacts may constitute a "serial meeting" in violation of the Brown Act if they are part of a series of individual contacts with other members of the legislative body for the purpose of "developing a collective concurrence." An explanation of what constitutes a serial meeting follows in Part V below. - 2 of14- @2006 Richards, Watson & Ger~hon 869104-1 B. Tbe seminar or conference exception I. The attendance by a majority of legislative body members at a seminar, conference or similar educational gathering also is generally exempted from Brown Act requirements (Section 54952.2(c)(2)). In order to qualify under this exception, the seminar or conference must be open to the public and must involve issues of general interest to the public or to cities. A League of California Cities seminar is an example of an educational gathering that fulfills these requirements, However, this exception will not apply to a seminar or conference if a majority of legislative body members discuss among themselves items of specific business relating to their own local agency other than as part of the scheduled program. C. Tbe community meeting exception The community meeting exception allows a majority of legislative body members to attend privately-sponsored neighborhood meetings, town hall forums, chamber of commerce lunches or other community meetings at which issues of local interest are discussed (Section 54952.2(c)(3)). In order to fall within this exception, though, the community meeting must be "open and publicized." This means that attendance by a majority oflegislative body members at a homeowners association meeting that is limited to the residents of a particular development and only publicized among members of that development would not qualify for this exemption. Also, as with the other meeting exceptions, a majority of legislative body members cannot discuss among themselves items of business of their own local agency other than as part of the scheduled program. D. The other legislative body exception This exception allows a majority of members of any legislative body to attend meetings of other legislative bodies of their local agency, or of another local agency, without treating such attendance as a meeting of the body (Section 54952.2(c)(4)). Of course, as with other meeting exceptions, the legislative body members are prohibited from discussing items of business of their local agency among themselves other than as part of the scheduled meeting. E. The social or ceremonial occasion exception Brown Act requirements do not apply to attendance by a majority of legislative body members at a purely social or ceremonial occasion (Section 54942.2(c)(5)). This exception only applies, though, if a majority of legislative body members do not discuss among themselves items of business of their local agency. F. The standing committee exception This exception allows members of a legislative body who are not members of a standing committee of that body to attend an open and noticed meeting of the standing c.omrnittee without making the gathering a meeting of the fulllegistative body itself (Section 54952.2(c)(6)). The -3 of14- ~ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104-1 standing committee exception addresses the situation where the attendance at a standing committee meeting by legislative body members who are not standing committee members would create a gathering Df a majority of the legislative body (and therefore, a "meeting" of the legislative body). In order to fall within the standing committee exception, the legislative body members who are not members of the standing committee may attend only as "observers." This means that such persons should not speak at the standing committee's meeting, sit in their usual seat on the dais or otherwise participate in the meeting. To avoid this awkward situation, we generally recommend that, if a standing committee meeting is likely to be attended by other legislative body members, then the meeting should be agendized as a meeting of the whole legislative body. This will allow participation by all the legislative body members. III. Permitted Locations of Meetings and Teleconferencing The Brown Act generally requires all meetings of a legislative body to occur within the boundaries of the local agency (Section 54954(b)). There are exceptions to this rule, however, such as one to allow meetings with a legislative body of another local agency in that agency's jurisdiction. Meetings held outside of a local agency's boundaries pursuant to an exception still must comply with agenda and notice requirements, which are discussed in Part VI below. "Teleconferencing" may be used as a method for conducting meetings whereby members of a legislative body may be counted towards a quorum and participate fully in the meeting from remote locations (Section 54953(b )). The following requirements apply: the remote locations may be connected to the main meeting location by telephone, video or both; the notice and agenda of the meeting must identify the remote locations; the remote locations must be posted and accessible to the public; all votes must be by roll call; and the meeting must in all respects comply with the Brown Act, including participation by members of the public present in remote locations. A quorum of the legislative body must participate from locations within the jurisdiction, but other members may participate from outside the jurisdiction. The teleconferencing rules only apply to members of the legislative body; they do not apply to staff members, attorneys or consultants who can participate remotely without following the posting and public access requirements. IV. ADA Compliance All meetings of a legislative body, other than closed session meetings or parts of meetings involving a closed session, are required to be held in a location and conducted in a manner that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the federal rules and regulations implementing that law (Section 54953.2). In addition, if requested, the agenda and documents in the agenda packet must be made available in alternative formats to persons with a disability (Section 54954.1). The agenda must include information regarding how, to whom, and when a request for disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, may be made by a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in the meeting (Section 54954.2). V. Serial Meetings -4 of [4- @ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869]()4-1 In addition to regulating gatherings of a majority of legislative body members, the Brown Act also addresses some contacts between individual legislative body members. As explained in Part II above, the individual contact exception to the "meeting" definition specifically states that nothing in the statute is intended to impose requirements on individual contacts or conversations between a legislative body member and any other person (Section 54952.2(c)(1)). Despite this exception, however, the Brown Act does prohibit a series of such individual contacts (commonly referred to as a "serial meeting'') if they result in a majority of legislative body members developing a "collective concurrence as to action to be taken on an item by the members of the legislative body" (Section 54952.2(b)). A serial meeting is a series of meetings or communications between individuals in which ideas are exchanged among a majority of a legislative body (such as three councilmembers) through either one or more persons acting as intermediaries or through use of a technologicaJ device (such as a telephone answering machine, e-mail or voice mail). A serial meeting can occur even though a majority of legislative body members never gather in a room at the same time, and it typically results in one of two ways. The first is when a staff member, a legislative body member, or some other person individually contacts a majority oflegislative body members and shares ideas among the majority ("I've talked to members A and B and they will vote 'yes.' Will you?"). Alternatively, without the involvement of a third person, member A calls member B, who then calls member C, and so on, until a majority of the legislative body has reached a collective concurrence on a matter. In order to avoid inadvertent violation of the serial meeting rule, we reconunend the following guidelines be followed. These rules of conduct apply only when a majority of a legislative body is involved in a series of individual contacts or communications, whether with local agency staff members, constituents, developers, lobbyists or other members of the legislative body. A. Contacts with staff Staff can inadvertently become a conduit among a majority of a legislative body in the course of providing briefings on items of local agency business. The Attorney General has taken the position that, when local agency staff individually brief a majority of legislative body members, such briefing necessarily constitutes an illegal serial meeting. We do not agree with this highly restrictive interpretation, but there is no doubt that staff briefings can easily lead to a collective concurrence if not handled carefully. To avoid development of a collective concurrence in contacts with staff: Staff briefings of legislative body. members should be "uni-directional" when done on an individual basis for a majority of the legislative body members. This means that information should flow from staff to the member, and the member's participation should be limited to asking questions and acquiring information. Otherwise, multiple members could separately give staff direction thereby causing staff to shape or modify their ultimate recommendations in order to reconcile the views of the various members, resulting in a collective concurrence. - 5 of14. @2006Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104-1 . A legislative body member should not ask staff to describe the views of other legislative body members, and staff should not volunteer those views ifknown. Staff may present their views to a legislative body member during an individual contact, but staff should not ask for that member's views. Additionally, that member should avoid disclosing his or her views unless it is absolutely clear that staff is not discussing the matter with a majority of the legislative body. B. Contacts with constituents, developers and lobbyists A constituent, developer or lobbyist can also inadvertently become an intermediary who causes an illegal serial meeting. Such persons' unfamiliarity with the requirements of the Brown Act aggravate this potential problem because they may expect a legislative body member to be willing to commit to a position in a private conversation in advance of a meeting. To avoid development of a collective concurrence in contacts with constituents, developers and lobbyists: State the ground rules "up front." Ask if the person has talked, or intends to talk, with other members of the legislative body about the same subject. If the answer is "yes," then make it clear that the person should not disclose the views of other legislative body members during the conversation. Explain to the person that you will not make a final decision on a matter prior to the meeting. Here is our suggested explanation: "State law prevents me from giving you a commitment outside a meeting. I wi1l1isten to what you have to say and give it consideration as I make up my mind." Do more listening and asking questions than expressing opinions. If you disclose your thoughts about a matter, counsel the person not to share them with other members of the legislative body. C. Contacts with fellow members of the same legislative body Direct contacts concerning local agency business with fellow members of the same legislative body (such as through face-to-face or telephonic conversations, notes, letters, e-mail or staff members) are the most obvious means by which an illegal serial meeting can occur. This is not to say that a legislative body member is precluded from discussing items of local agency business with another legislative body member outside of a meeting; as long as the communication does not involve a majority of the legislative body, no "meeting" has occurred. There is, however, always the risk that one participant in the conununication will disclose the views of the other participant to a third or fourth legislative body member, creating the possibility a collective concurrence will be achieved outside a public meeting. Therefore, we recommend a cOWlcilmember (or commissioner) avoid discussing city business with a majority of councilmembers (or commissioners), and that a councilmember (or commissioner) also avoid communicating the views of other councilmembers (or commissioners) outside a meeting. -6 of14- IV 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104-] We recognize that these suggested rules of conduct may seem unduly restrictive and impractical, and may make acquisition of important information more difficult or time- consuming. Nevertheless, following them will help assure that your conduct comports with the Brown Act's goal of achieving open government. If you have questions about compliance with the statute in any given situation, please ask us for advice. VI. Notice and Agenda Requirements A. Time of notice and content of agenda In order to ensure that the public's business is conducted openly, the Brown Act requires that legislative bodies publicly post agendas prior to their meetings (Sections 54954.2, 54955 and 54956), The time by which an agenda has to be posted in advance of a meeting, and the content ofthe agenda, depends on whether the meeting is "regular," "special," or "emergency." Legislative bodies, except advisory committees and standing committees, are required to establish a time and place for holding regular meetings (Section 54954(a)). A "regular" meeting is a meeting that occurs on the legislative body's established meeting day. Agendas for a regular meeting must be publicly posted 72 hours in advance of the meeting (Section 54954.2(a)), and must contain a brief general description of each item of business to be transacted or discussed (Section 54954.2(a)). The description need not exceed 20 words. A "special" meeting is a meeting that is held at a time or place other than the time and place established for regular meetings. For special meetings, the "call and notice" ofthe meeting and the agenda (which are typically one and the same) must be posted at least 24 hours prior to the meeting (Section 54956). Additionally, each member of the legislative body must personally receive \vntten notice of the special meeting either by personal delivery or by "any other means" (such as facsimile, e-mail or U.S. mail) at least 24 hours before the time of the special meeting, unless they have previously waived receipt of written notice. Members of the press (including radio and television stations) and other members of the public can also request written notice of special meetings and, if they have, that notice must be given at the same time notice is provided to members of the legislative body. An "emergency" meeting may be called to address certain dire situations, such as a terrorist act or crippling disaster, without complying with the 24.hour notice requirement for special meetings. Certain requirements apply for notifying the press and for conducting closed sessions as part of those meetings, and except as specified, all other rules governing special meetings apply (Section 54956.5). Both regular and special meetings may be adjourned to another time. Notices of adjourned meetings must be posted on the door of the meeting chambers where the meeting occurred within 24 hours after the meeting is adjourned (Section 54955). If the adjourned meeting occurs more than five days after the prior meeting, a new agenda for that adjourned meeting must be posted 72 hours in advance of the adjourned meeting (Section 54954.2(b)(3)). -7 of14- rg 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104.1 The Brown Act requires local agencies to mail the agenda or the full agenda packet to any person making a written request no later than the time the agenda is posted or is delivered to the members of the legislative body, whichever is earlier. A local agency may charge a fee to recover its costs of copying and mailing. Any person may make a standing request to receive these materials, in which event the request must be renewed annually. Failure by any requestor to receive the agenda does not constitute grounds to invalidate any action taken at a meeting (Section 54954.1). B. Action on and discussion of Don-agenda items The Brown Act also ensures the public's business is conducted openly by restricting legislative bodies' ability to deviate from posted agendas. The statute affords legislative bodies limited authority to act on or discuss non-agenda items at regular meetings, but forbids doing so at special meetings. As a general rule, a legislative body may not act on or discuss any item that does not appear on the agenda posted for a regular meeting (Section 54954.2). This rule does not, however, preclude a legislative body from acting on a non-agenda item if it detennines by a majority vote that an emergency situation exists. For purposes of this exception, the tenn "emergency situation" refers to work stoppages or crippling disasters that severely impair public health, safety or both. The rule also does not preclude a legislative body from acting on a non- agenda item that the body finds came to the local agency's attention subsequent to the agenda posting and requires immediate action. In order to utilize this exception, the legislative body must make these findings by a two-thirds vote of those present (by unanimous vote if less than two-thirds of the body is present). This means that if four members of a five-member body are present, three votes are required to add the item; if only three afe present, a unanimous vote is required. Legislative bodies may, notwithstanding the general rule set forth above. discuss non. agenda items at a regular meeting pursuant to certain exceptions. These exceptions are as follows: Legislative body members or staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons during public comment periods; Legislative body members or staff may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement or make a brief report on their own activities; Legislative body members may, subject to the procedural rules of the body, provide a reference to staff or other resources for factual information; . Legislative body members may, subject to the procedural rules of the body, request staff to report back to the legislative body at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter; and - g ofl4- @2006Richards, Watson & Gershon 8(911)4-1 . Legislative body members may, subject to the procedural rules oftht body. take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda. The legislative body may not discuss non-agenda items to any significant degree under these exceptions. This means there should not be long or wide-ranging question and answer sessions on non-agenda items between the legislative body and the public or benveen the legislative body and staff. It is important 10 follow these exceptions carefully and construe them narrowly to avoid tainting an important and complex action by a non-agendized discussion of the item. The Brown Act contains even more stringent regulations to restrict action on and discussion of non-agenda items at special meetings. In particular. the statute mandates that only business that is specified in the "call and notice" of the special meeting may be considered by the legislative body (Section 54956). There are no exceptions to this rule. VII. Public Participation A. Regular meetings The Brown Act requires that agendas for regular meetings allow for rn'o types of public comment periods. The first is a general audience comment period, which is the part of the meeting where the public can comment on any item of interest that is within the suhject matter jurisdiction of the local agency. This general audience comment period may come at any time during a meeting (Section 54954.3(a)). The second type of public comment period for regular meetings is the specific comment period pertaining to items on the agenda. The Brown Act requires a legislative body to allow members of the public to comment on agenda items either before or during the body's consideration of that item (Section 54954.3(a)). Some local agencies accomplish both requirements by placing a general audience (;Omment period at the beginning of the agenda where the public can comment on agenda and non-agenda items. Others provide public comment periods as each item or group of items comes up on the agenda, and then (eave the general public comment period to the end of the agenda. Either method is permissible, though public comment on public hearing items must be taken during the hearing. Caution should also be taken with consent calendars. A legislative body should have a public comment period for consent calendar items before the body acts on the consent calendar, unle~s it permils members of the audience to "pull" items from the calendar. The Brown Act allows a legislative body to preclude public conunents on an agenda item in one situation - when the item was considered by a committee, composed solely of members of the body. that held a meeting where public comments on that item were allowed. So, if the legislative body has standing committees (which are required to have agendized and open meetings with an opportunity for the public to comment on agenda items) and the committee has previously considered an item, then at the time the item comes before the full legislative body, the body may choose not to take additional public comments on that item. However, if the -90fI4- ~ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104-1 version presented to the full legislative body is different from the version presented to and considered by the committee, then the public must be given another opportunity to speak on that item at the meeting of the full body (Section 54954.3(a)). ~ lOof 14- ~ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon M9104-1 B. Special meetings The Brown Act requires that agendas for special meetings provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the legislative body concerning any item listed on the agenda before or during the body's consideration of that item (Section 54954.3(a)). Unlike regular meetings, though, in a special meeting the legislative body does not have to allow public comment on non-agenda matters. c. Limitations on the length and content of public comments A legislative body may adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated to each person for public testimony. For example, typical time limits restrict speakers to three or five minutes. A legislative body may also adopt reasonable regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated for public testimony on legislative matters, such as a zoning ordinance or other regulatory ordinance (Section 54954.3(b)). However, we do not recommend setting total time limits per item for any quasi-judicial matter, such as a conditional use pennit application, because such a restriction could result in a violation of the due process rights of those who were not able to speak to the body during the time allotted. The Brown Act precludes a legislative body from prohibiting public criticism of the policies, procedures, programs, or services of the local agency or the acts or omissions of the body (Section 54954.3(c)). This does not mean that a member of the public may say anything. If the topic is not within the subject matter jurisdiction of the local agency, then the member of the public can be cut off. A legislative body also may adopt reasonable rules of decorum that preclude a speaker from disrupting, disturbing or otherwise impeding the orderly conduct of its meetings (Section 54954.3(b)). The right to publicly criticize a public ofliciat does not include the right to slander that official, though the line benveen criticism and slander is often difficult to detennine in the heat of the moment. Care must be given to avoid violating the free speech rights of speakers by suppressing opinions relevant to the business of the legislative body. Finally, in some circwnstances, the use of profanity may be a basis for stopping a speaker. It \vill depend, ho\vever, upon \\lhat profane words or conunents are made and the context of those comments. Therefore, no one should be ruled out of order for profanity unless the language both is truly objectionable and causes a disturbance or disruption in the proceeding. D. Additional rights of the public The Brown Act grants the public the right to videotape or broadcast a public meeting, as well as the right to make a motion picture or still camera record of such meeting (Section 54953.5(a)). A legislative body may prohibit or limit recording of a meeting, however, if the body finds that the recording Calliot continue without noise, illumination or view obstruction that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption of the proceedings (Section 54953.6)). - 11 of14- (k) 2006 Richards, Warson & Gershon 869lO4.t Any audio or video tape record of an open and public meeting that is made, for whatever purpose, by or at the direction of the local agency is a public record and is subject to inspection by the public consistent with the requirements of the Public Records Act (Section 54953.5(b)). The local agency must not destroy the tape or film record for at least 30 days following the date of the taping or recording. Inspection of the audiotape or videotape must be made available to the public for free on equipment provided by the local agency. The Brown Act requires written material distributed to a majority of the body by any person to be provided to the public without delay. If the material is distributed during the meeting and prepared by the local agency, it must be available for public inspection at the meeting. If it is distributed during the meeting by a member of the public, it must be made available for public inspection after the meeting (Section 54957.5). This role is inapplicable, however, to attorney-client memoranda. The California Supreme Court affirmed the confidentiality of such documents in the case of Roberts v. City of Palmdale, 5 CalAth 363 (1993), which was litigated by our firm. One problem in applying this rule arises when v>'litlen materials are distributed directly to a majority of the legislative body without knowledge of staff, or even without the legislative body members knowing that a majority has received it. The law still requires these materials to be treated as public records. Thus, it is a good idea for at least one member of the legislative body to ensure that staff gets a copy of any document distributed to members of the legislative body so that copies can be made for the local agency's records and for members of the public who request a copy. VIII. Closed Sessions The Brown Act allows a legislative body to convene a "closed session" during a meeting in order to meet privately with its advisors on specifically enumerated topics. Sometimes people refer to closed sessions as "executive sessions," which is a holdover tenn from the statute's early days. Examples of business that may be discussed in closed session include personnel evaluations, threats to public safety. labor negotiations, pending litigation, confidential final draft audit reports by the Bureau of State Audits, real estate negotiations, and specific pension fund investments (Sections 54956.75, 54956.8, 54956.81. 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6). Potitical sensitivity of an item is not a lawful reason for a closed session discussion. The Brown Act requires that closed session business be described on the public agenda. And, there is a "bonus" of sorts for using prescribed language to describe closed sessions in that legal challenges to the adequacy of the description are precluded (Section 54954.5). This 50- called "safe harbor" encourages many local agencies to use a very similar agenda format. Tape recording of closed sessions is not required unless a court orders such taping after finding a closed session violation (Section 54960). Closed sessions may be started in a location different from the usual meeting place as long as the location is noted on the agenda and the public can be present when the meeting first begins. Moreover, public comment on closed session items must be allowed before convening the closed session. .12 of 14 ~ <9 2006 Richard~. Watson & Gershon 869\04-1 After a closed session, the legislative body must reconvene the public meeting and publicly report certain types of actions if they were taken, and the vote on those actions (Section 54957.1). There are limited exceptions for specified litigation decisions, and to protect the victims of sexual misconduct or child abuse. Contracts, settlement agreements or other documents that are fina1ty approved or adopted in closed session must be provided at the time the closed session ends to any person who has made a standing request for all documentation in connection with a request for notice of meetings (typically members of the media) and to any person who makes a request within 24 hours of the posting of the agenda, if the requestor is present when the closed session ends (Section 54957.1). One perelUlial area of confusion is whether a legislative body may discuss salary and benefits of an individual employee (such as a city manager) as part of a performance evaluation session under Section 54957. It may not. However, the body may designate a negotiator to negotiate with that employee and meet with its negotiator in closed session under Section 54957.6 to provide directions. The employee in question may not be present in such a closed sessIOn. The Brown Act prohibits any person ITom disclosing confidential information obtained during a closed session, unless the legislative body authorizes the disclosure. Violations can be addressed through injunctions, disciplinary action, and referral to the grand jury (Section 54963). IX. Enforcement There are both civil remedies and criminal misdemeanor penalties for BrO\\l1 Act violations. The civil remedies include injunctions against further violations, orders nullifying any unlawful action, orders detennining the validity of any rule to penalize or discourage the expression of a member of the legislative body, and remedies for breaching closed session confidences. (Sections 54960. 54960.1 and 54963). Prior to filing suit to challenge an alleged Brown Act violation, the complaining party must make a written demand on the legislative body to cure or correct the alleged violation. The written demand must be made within 90 days after the challenged action was taken. Ho\vever, if the challenged action was taken in open session and involves a violation of the agenda requirements of Section 54954.2, then the written demand must be made within 30 days. The legislative body is required to cure or correct the challenged action and inform the party who filed the demand of its correcting actions, or its decision not to cure or correct, within 3D days. A suit must be filed by the complaining party within 15 days after receipt of the written notice from the legislative body, or if there is no written response, within 15 days after the 3D-day cure period expires. A member of a legislative body will not be criminally liable for a violation of the Brown Act unless the member intends to deprive the public of information to which the member knows or has reason to know the public is entitled to under the statute (Section 54959). This standard became effective in 1994 and is a different standard from most criminal standards. Until it is - 13 of 14- @ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104.1 applied and interpreted by a court, it is not clear what type of evidence will be necessary to prosecute a Brown Act violation. Conclusion The Brown Act can be confusing, and compliance with it can be difficult, due to the statute's many rules and ambiguities. In the event that you have any questions regarding any provision of the law, please ask us for advice. -]4 of 14- @2006Richards, Watson & Gershon 869104-1 SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRINCIPAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAWS JANUARY 2006 Conflict of interest laws regulate public officials' decision-making, as well as their receipt of gifts, honoraria and loans. This paper briefly summarizes and discusses the major provisions and requirements of the principal conflict of interest laws. I. Laws Regulating Decision-making A. Political Reform Act of 1974 The Political Reform Act of 1974 ("PRA") is the principal law in California governing conflicts of interest for public officials. The PRA was enacted by initiative measure to ensure, among other things, that public officials abstain from decisions in which they have a conflict of interest and is codified in the Government Code at Section 81000 et seq. The Fair Political Practices Commission ("FPPC") has interpreted the PRA in a series of regulations found in Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations at Section 18110 et seqY The PRA prohibits public officials (including city councilmembers and conunissioners) from making, participating in the making, or in any way attempting to use their official position to influence a decision in which they know or have reason to know they have a financial interest (Section 87100). The FPPC has promulgated an eight-step test for determining when disqualification is required by this prohibition. For purposes of the PRA, a public official has a conflict of interest if the particular decision will have a reasonably foreseeable material financial effect on certain enumerated economic interests, unless that effect is indistinguishable from the effect on the public generally. Those financial interests are: "(a) Any business entity in which the public official has a direct or indirect investment worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more. (b) Any real property in which the public official has a direct or indirect interest worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more. (c) Any source of income, except gifts or loans by a commercial lending institution in the regular course of business on terms available to the public without regard to official status, aggregating five hundred dollars ($500) or more in value provided 1/ In this paper, citations to the Government Code are made in the following fonnat: "Section _." Citations to the FPPC's regulations are made in the following format: "Regulation Section " - 1 of20- (SJ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105.1 or promised to, received by the public official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. (d) Any business entity in which the public official is a director, officer. partner, trustee, employee, or holds any position of management. (e) Any donor of, or any intermediary or agent for a donor of, a gift or gifts aggregating three hundred sixty dollars ($360) or more in value provided to, received by, or promised to the public official within 12 months prior to the time when the decision is made. . .." [The dollar amount in this paragraph (e) is adjusted biarmually using the California Consumer Price Index] (Section 87103). A conflict of interest is disqualifying if the public official's participation is not legally required (Regnlation Section 18700). The regulations of the FPPC provide interpretation and guidance for most of the terms used in the PRA as well as standards for determining if each element of the PRA's prohibitions has been satisfied. Some of the most significant regulations address standards for determining if a decision has a material financial effect on a business entity (Regulation Section 18705.1) or on various types of interests in real property (Regulation Section 18705.2). These regulations have been recently revised and a summary is provided below? 1. Decisions affecting business entities There are a number of economic interests that may result in a conflict of interest for a public official. For example, a public official has an economic interest in any business entity in which either (i) the official has a direct or indirect investment worth two thousand dollars ($2,000) or more; or (ii) the official is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or holds a management position (Regulation Section 18703.1), In order to determine whether a decision ,....i11 have a material financial effect on a public official's economic interests, it is necessary to evaluate whether those interests are directly or indirectly involved in the decision. A business entity interest is deemed directly involved if it initiates, is a named party in, or is the subject of, the proceeding (Regulation Section 18704.1). The financial effect of a decision on a directly involved business entity interest is presumed to be matet1al unless the official's only economic interest is an investment \....orth $25,000 or less. When the interest of a business entity is indirectly involved, the materiality of a [mancial effect hinges on the size of the entity and the decision's impact on the entity's gross revenue, expenses, assets and liabilities (Regutation Sections 18704.1 and 18705.1). 2 / Since 1998, the Fair Political Practices Commission has been engaged in a thorough review of the regulations pertaining to conflicts of interest. As other changes occur, we will provide further written advice. ~ 2 of20- Cbl2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86'1I05,l For large "FortlUle 500" business entities, a decision will be found to materially affect the business entity if the decision will affect the gross revenues, expenses, assets or liabilities by $10,000,000 or more in a fiscal year or result in an increase or decrease in expenses by $2.500,000 or more in a fiscat year (Regulation Section 18705.1(c)(I)). Lower thresholds apply for companies that are listed or meet the criteria for listing on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ!AMEX (Regulation Section 18705.1(c)(2) and (3)). For small companies that are not listed on the Fortune 500, New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ! AMEX or do not meet the criteria for listing on the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ!AMEX. the decision is regarded as materially affecting the company if the decision will result in an increase or decrease in gross revenues for a fiscal year of $20,000 or more, or increase or reduce expenses by $5,000 or more in a fiscal year, or result in an increase or decrease in the value of its assets or liabilities by $20,000 or more (Regulation Section 18705.1(c)( 4)). Certain other standards apply if the source of income is a non-profit entity (Regulation Section I 8705.3(b)(2) or an individual (Regulation Section 18705.3(b)(3)). Lastly, if the public official receives or is promised to receive income to achieve a goal or purpose that would be achieved, defeated, aided, or hindered by the decision, then any reasonably foreseeable effect of the decision on that person (including a business entity) that is a source of income or promised source of income to the public official is deemed material (Regulation Section 18705.3(c)), This is the so-called "nexus" test and is likely to apply in situations where the public official is employed by a business entity where the job description involves accomplishing goals that would be achieved by the public official's decision. 2. Decisions affecting real property The FPPC revised its regulations governing conflicts of interest due to a real property interest a few years ago (Regulation Sections 18704.2 and 18705.2). As with business interests, whether decision will have a material effect on a real property interest depends upon whether the real property interest is directly or indirectly involved in the decision. A real property interest is deemed directly involved if it is the subject of the decision. The financial effect of a decision on a directly involved real property interest is presumed to be material, without regard to the effect of the decision on the value of the real prope11y. However, the presumption may be rebutted by proof that it is not reasonably foreseeable the decision will have any financial effect on the property. When a real property interest is indirectly involved, there are three standards for determining whether the financial effect on the official's interest is material. First, if a decision involves construction of, or improvements to, streets, water, sewer. storm drainage or similar facilities, and the official's real property will receive a new or substantially improved service, the decision is regarded as having a material financial effect on the official's property. - 3 of20 ~ ~ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105.) Second, if the official's property is within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property subject to the decision, the decision is presumed to have a material financial effect on the official's property. nus presumption may be rebutted, by proof that specific circumstances make it reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have no financial effect at all on the official's real property interest. Third, if the official's real property is located outside a radius ofSOO feet, the official's real property is considered to be indirectly involved and the decision is presumed to have no material financial effect on the official's property. This presumption may also be rebutted, however, by proof that specific circumstances make it reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect on the property. Such circumstances include situations where the decision affects: (i) the development potential or income producing potential of the official's real property; (ii) the use of the official's real property; (iii) the character of the neighborhood including, but not limited to, substantial effects on traffic, view, privacy, intensity of use, noise levels, air emission or similar traits of the neighborhood (Regulation Section 18705.2). lithe official's interest in real property is a leasehold interest (a leasehold of more than one month or a leasehold that is more than a month-to-month lease), then a decision that does not directly affect that property would have to substantially affect the use, enjoyment or term of the lease or affect the rent by five percent (5%) during any 12-month period, before the official would have a conflict of interest. If the property to which the leasehold interest applies is directly involved in the decision, the effect on the leasehold interest is presumed to be material unless there is proof that the decision will have no financial effect on the leasehold interest, or the leasehold is a month-te-month lease or shorter. (Regulation Sections 18233, 18705.2). 3. Decisions affecting prospective employers On January 1, 2004, an amendment to the PRA went into effect, which prohibits all public officials from making, participating in making, or using their official positions to influence, any governmental decision directly relating to or likely to financially impact a prospective employer. Gov't Code S 87407. Accordingly, in the event a councilmember is engaged in negotiations with a prospective employer, or has a preexisting arrangement for future work for an employer, and that employer then seeks a penmt or other approval from the City, the Councilmember should abstain from any participation in that decision. Where a Coul1cilmember has rejected an offer of employment, or been rejected by an employer, abstention is not required (Regulation Section t8747). 4. The "public generally" exception Once it is detennined that it is reasonably foreseeable that a decision will have a material financial effect on a public official's economic interest, it is necessary to evaluate whether an exception to the disqualification requirement is applicable. One exception is that disqualification is not required when the offidal's economic interest will be affected in substantially the same manner as a significant segment of the public (Regulation Section 18707). This exception is known as the "public generally" exception and provides that even if the decision will have a -4 of20- @2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 reasonably foreseeable material financial effect on the official's financial interest, disqualification is required only if the effect on the public official is distinguishable from the effect on the financial interests of the public generally or a significant segment of that public. The "public generally" is comprised of the entire jurisdiction of the city (In re Legan, 9 FPPC Op', t (1985)). Pursuant to Regulation Section 18707.1, if the official's financial interest is the official's personal expenses, income, assets or liabilities, a governmental decision will affect a significant segment of the public if the decision will affect ten percent or more of the city's population or 5,000 individuals who are residents of the city. If the official's financial interest is real property, a governmental decision will affect a significant segment of the public if the decision will affect ten percent or more of the city's property owners or homeowners or 5,000 property owners or homeowners of the city. Lastly, if the official's financial interest is a business entity, a governmental decision will affect a significant segment of the public if the decision will affect 2,000 or twenty-five percent of all businesses in the city. Certain additional rules apply if the city has a population of less than 25,000 (Regulation Section 18707.3) or if the decision affects a predominant industry, trade or profession in the city (Section 18707.7). Another exception is that disqualification is not required when the official's participation is legally required (Regulation Section 18708). This "rule of legally required participation" addresses the situation where there is no quorum due to a conflict of interest disqualification (as opposed to a decision maker's absence or abstention), and it cannot be used to break a tie. This exception may be invoked under very limited circumstances. 5. Rules for abstention The PRA was amended. effective January 1, 2003, to establish specific rules of procedure when a public official has a conflict of interest and is required to abstain from the decision. Immediately prior to the consideration of the matter, the official is to: (i) identify the financial interest that gives rise to the conflict in detail sufficient to be understood by the public except that disclosure of the exact street address of a residence is not required; (ii) publicly state his or her recusal from the matter; and (iii) leave the room until after the disposition of the matter unless the matter appears on a consent calendar or other similar portion of an agenda for uncontested matters (Section 87105. Regulation Section 18702.5). The new law allows the public official to comment on the item as a member of the public during the public comment period. However, other provisions of the contlict of interest laws limit the ability of a disqualified official to speak as a member of the public on the item. Specifically, the public official may speak as a member of the general public solely to represent himself or herself on a matter that is related to his or her "personal interests." A "personal interest" includes an interest in real property or a business entity that is wholly o\vned by the official or his or her immediate family (Regulation Section 18702.4). If a public official wishes to speak on a matter related to his or her "personal interests," the official may wish to observe the comments of other speakers via closed-circuit television, so that he or she may effectively rehut anything those speakers discuss. - 5 of20- @2006Richards, Watson & Gershon 81j9105-1 B. Government Code Section] 090 Government Section 1090 provides in relevant part: "Members of the Legislature, state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees shan not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members. . . ." The prohibition contained in Section 1090 is intended to preclude a public official from using his or her official position as a government officer or employee to obtain business or fmancial advantage. The purpose of the prohibition is to remove the possibility of any personal influence that might bear on an official's decision-making activities with respect to contracts executed by the governmental entity. The prohibition contained in Section 1090 involves three principal components: (1) the person subject to the prohibition must be regarded as an officer or employee of one of the types of governmental entities listed; (2) the public officer or employee must be financially interested in the contract; and (3) the contract must be made by either (i) the public official in his or her official capacity; or (ii) the body or board of which the official is a member. Section 1090 is unlike the PRA (discussed in Sub-Part A above) and the common law doctrine against conflicts of interest (discussed in Sub-Part C below). Those laws obligate the public official with the conflict of interest to abstain from participation in the decision, but otherwise allow the decision to go forward. By contrast. Section 1090 prevents a municipality from entering into a contract in which one of its officers or employees has a financial interest unless certain exceptions apply. Over the years, the courts have broadly interpreted the key provisions of Section 1090. For example, the California Supreme Court has ruled that the term "financially interested" include" any direct interest, such as that involved when a public official enters directly into a contract with the body of which he is a member (17:ompson v. Call, 38 Ca1.3d 633 (1985)). The California Court of Appeal has interpreted "financially interested" as including indirect financial interests in a contract where, for example, a public official would gain something financially by the making of the contract (Fraser-famor Agency, Inc. v. County of Del Norte, 68 Ca1.AppJd 201 (1977)). Additionally, the California Court of Appeal has construed the tenn "made" as encompassing such elements in the making of a contract as preliminary discussions, negotiations, compromises, reasoning, planning, drawing of plans or specifications and solicitation for bids {Mi/brae Association for Residential Survival v. City of Milbrae, 262 Cal.App.2d 222 (1968); City Council v. McKinley. 80 Cat.AppJd 204 (1978)). There are two categories of exceptions to Section 1090. The first, encompassing what are commonly referred to as "remote interests," is set forth in Section 1091. If an official has only a remote interest in a contract, then a municipality may enter into the contract as long as the official abstains from participating in any way in the decision. The second category of .60f20- <<J 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105.1 exceptions is found in Section 1091.5. These exceptions are called "non.interests" and are excluded from the scope of Section 1 090 altogether. The penalties for violating Section 1 090 are very severe. In particular, the contract will be deemed void (Section 1 092), and the public official with the financial interest in the contract may be subject to civil and criminal penalties and may be fined and forever barred from holding public office (Section 1 097). C. Common law doctrine against conflicts of interest The common law doctrine against conflicts of interest constitutes the courts' expression of the public policy against public officials using their official positions for their private benefit (Terry v. Bender, t43 Cat.App.2d 198 (1956)). This doctrine provides an independent basis from the PRA for requiring public officials and employees to abstain from participating in discussions or decisions involving matters in which they have a financial interest. Violation of the doctrine can amount to official misconduct and can result in loss of office (Nussbaum v. Weeks, 214 Cat.App.3d 1589 (1989)). By virtue of holding public office, an elected official "is impliedly bound to exercise the powers conferred on him with disinterested skill, zeal, and diligence and primarily for the benefit of the public." (Noble v. City of Polo Alto, 89 Cat.App. 47, 51 (1928)). An elected official bears a fiduciary duty to exercise the powers of office for the benefit of the public and is not permitted to use those powers for the benefit of a private interest (Jd.; see also Nussbaum v. Weeks, 214 Cal.App.3d 1589, 1597-98 (1989)). The common law doctrine against conflicts of interest has been primarily applied to require a public official to abstain from participation in cases where the official's private financial interest may conflict with his or her official duties (64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 795, 797 (1981)). However, the doctrine also applies when specific circumstances preclude a public official from being a disinterested, W1biased decision maker for a quasi-judicial matter. In one case, a councilmember who voted to deny permits for a condominium project was deemed to have a common law conflict of interest due to his interest in preserving his ocean view and his personat animosity toward the applicants (Clark v. City of Hermosa Beach, 48 Cal.AppAth 1152 (1996)). However, courts are reluctant to find a common law conflict of interest except in particularly egregious circumstances (Breakzone Billiards 1'. City of Torrance, 81 Cal.App.4th 1205. 1233 (2000)). II. Laws Regulating Receipt of Political Contributions, Gifts, Honoraria and Loans The PRA provisions and other conflict of interest laws discussed above do not prohibit a public official from having an interest in a business or real property. Instead, they merely limit the official's ability to participate in a decision that would materially affect those interests. There are additional restrictions in the PRA, however, with regard to certain gifts, honoraria and loans. The statute precludes local officials (including city councilmembers and planning commissioners) from receiving certain gifts, honoraria and loans. These prohibitions -70f20- ~ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86'1[05-1 apply whether or not the source of the gift, honorarium or loan is, or will ever be, affected by a decision of the official's agency. This Part outlines these prohibitions. A. Conflicts arising from political contributions Campaign contributions do not constitute a gift within the meaning of the PRA. Campaign contributions also are not considered "income" for purposes of the statute. [Government Code Section 82030(b)(1).] For this reason, receipt of a campaign contribution does not create a conflict of interest that disqualifies a Council Member from voting on a City Council decision involving the contributor. [Woodland Hills Residents Assn., Inc. v. City Council, 26 CaUd 938 (1980); Breakzone Billiards v. City of Torrance, 81 Cal.App.4th 1205 (2000).) In other words, City Council Members acting in their capacity as elected City Council Members are not prohibited from acting on a matter which involves someone who has given them a political contribution. Council Members act in their elected capacity as members of the City Council, Board of Library Commissioners, or the Financing Authority. Receipt of a campaign contribution can, however, disqualify a Council Member from a non-City Council decision involving the contributor. Under the "Levine Act" (Government Code Section 84308), when a Council Member is appointed to another board, a political contribution may disqualify the member from acting on the matter. A Council Member acting on behalf of an agency other than the City must abstain from a license, pennit or other use entitlement decision involving an applicant, proponent or opponent who has made a campaign contribution in excess of $250 within the preceding 12 months. The fact of the campaign contribution must be disclosed prior to the abstention. This disqualification is inapplicable if the campaign contribution is returned within 30 days ofreceipt. [Section 84308.] COWlcil Members do not act in their elected capacity when they serve, for example, on the Orange County Fire Authority Board, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Authority, Foothill~ Eastern Transportation Authority, or El Taro Reuse Planning Authority. B. Limitations on rrceipt of gifts 1. General Gift Limitation - Govenunent Code Section 89503 (a) provides: "No elected state officer, elected officer of a local government agency, or other individual specified in Section 87200 shall accept gifts from any single source in any calendar vear with a total value of more than [$360]." (Emphasis added). (Section 89503(a); Regulation Section 18703.4.) Officials listed in Section 87200, in turn, include mayors, city councilmembers, planning commissioners, city managers, city attorneys, city treasurers, and candidates for any of these offices. - g of20- ::g 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869]05-1 A similar limitation prohibits a city employee designated in a conflict of interest code from accepting gifts from a single source totaling more than $360 in value in any calendar year, if the gifts would be required to be reported on his or her statement of economic interests (Section 89503(c); Regulation Section 18703.4). 2. Biennial Gift Limit Adjustment - The PRA authorizes the FPPC to make an inflationary adjustment of the limitations set forth in Section 89503 every two years (Section 89503(f)). The most recent adjustment became effective on January 1, 2005, and the gift limitation is now $360, This figure will be further adjusted in future odd-numbered years, 3. Exceptions to Gifts and Gift Limitations - None of the following is a gift and none is subject to any limitation on gifts (Regulation Section 18942): a. Informational Materials - such as books, calendars, videotapes, and free or discounted admission to educational conferences that are provided to assist the official in the perfonnance of official duties. b. Returned Gifts - a gift that is not used and that, within 30 days after receipt, is returned or donated pursuant to Regulation Section 18943, or for which reimbursement is paid pursuant to Regulation Section 18943. c, Family Gifts - a gift from an individual's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in~law, hrother-in-law, sister-in-lav,r, nephew, niece, aWlt, uncle, or first cousin or the spouse of any such person, Wlless the donor is acting as an agent or intermediary for any other person. d. Campaign Contributions - Discussed in section "A." Please note, however, campaign contributions are required to be reported. e. Inherited ft-Ioney or Property - any devise or inheritance. f. Awards - a personalized plaque or trophy with an individual value ofless than two hundred fifty dollars ($250). g. Home Hospitality - hospitality (including food, beverages, or occasional lodging) provided to an official by an individual in his or her home when the individual or a member of the individual's family is present. h. Presents on Personal or FamilJ.' Occasions - presents exchanged between an official and an individual, other than a lobbyist, on holidays, birthdays, or similar occasions provided that the presents exchanged are not substantially disproportionate in value. 1. Admission and Incidentals at Speaking Events - free admission, and refreshments and similar non-cash nominal benefits provided to an official during the entire event at which the official gives a speech, participates in a panel or seminar, or provides a similar service, and actual intrastate transportation and any ne.cessary lodging and subsistence provided -90f20- !Q 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 directly in connection with the speech, panel, seminar, or service, including but not limited to meals and beverages on the day of the activity. These items are not payments and need not be reported by any official. j. Campaign Travel - the transportation, lodging, and subsistence provided in direct connection with campaign activities, including attendance at political fundraisers. 4. Gifts to Your Family - Regulation Section 18944 provides (in summary): a. Gifts given directly to members of an official's immediate family are not gifts to the official unless used or disposed of by the official or given by the recipient member of the official's immediate family to the official for disposition or use at the official's discretion. b. Gifts delivered by mail or other written communication are given directly to members of the official's immediate family if the family members' names or familial designations (such as "spouse") appear in the address on the envelope or in the communication tendering or offering the gift, and the gift is intended for their use or enjoyment. c. A gift given to the official, but designated for the official and spouse or family, is a gift to the official if the official exercises discretion and control over who will actually use the gift. d. If the official enjoys direct benefit from a single gift, as well as members of the official's family, the full value of the gift is attributable to the official. 5. Tickets to Political and Charitable Fundraisers - Regulation Section 18946.4 provides (in summary): a. Nonprofit Fundraiser - Except as provided in subdivision (b), a ticket to a fund-raising event for a nonprofit, tax-exempt organization (that is not a political campaign committee) shall be valued as follows: (1) Where the event is a fund-raising event for a nonprofit organization, and the ticket clearly states that a portion of the ticket price is a donation to the organization, then the value of the gift is the face value of the ticket or admission reduced by the amount of the donation. (2) If the ticket has no stated price or no stated donation portion, the value of the gift is the fair market value of any food, beverage, or other tangible benefits provided to each attendee. b. Fundraiser for a religious, charitable, scientific, literary or educational organization - Where the event is a fund-raising event for an organization exempt -10 of20- @2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 from taxation under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), the ticket or other admission privilege has no value. c. Political Fundraiser - Where the event is a fund-raising event for a campaign committee or candidate, the ticket or other admission privilege has no value. 6. Prizes and Awards from Competitions - Regulation Section 18946.5 provides (in summary): A prize or an award received shall be reported as a gift unless the prize or award is received in a bona fide competition not related to the recipient's status as an official or candidate. A prize or award that is not reported as a gift shall be reported as income. 7. Certain Gifts of Travel Exempt from Gift Limitations a. Travel In Connection With Speeches, Panels, and Seminars - a payment made for travel, including actual transportation and related lodging and subsistence, is not subject to the prohibitions or limitations on honoraria and gifts if: (1) The travel is reasonably related to a legislative or governmental purpose, or to an issue of state, national, or international public policy, and (2) The travel, including actual transportation and related lodging and subsistence, is in connection with a speech given by the official or candidate; the lodging and subsistence expenses are limited to the day immediately preceding, the day of, and the day immediately following the speech; and the travel is within the United States. b. Travel Provided by Governmental Entity or Charity - A payment made for travel, including actual transportation and related lodging and subsistence, is not subject to the prohibitions or limitations on honoraria and gifts if: (1) The travel is reasonably related to a legislative or governmental purpose, or to an issue of state, national, or international public policy; and (2) The payment is provided by a government, a governmental agency, a foreign govenunent, a govenunental authority, a bona fide public or private educational institution, defined in California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 203, or by a nonprofit charitable or religious organization that is exempt from taxation under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), or by a person that is domiciled outside the United States and that substantially satisfies the requirements for tax exempt status under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). c. Travel Paid From Campaign Funds - A payment made for transportation and necessary lodging and subsistence, which payment is made from campaign funds as pennitted by Section 89513, or which is a contribution, is not an honorarium or a gift. - II of20- CD 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-[ d. Travel Provided By Official's Agency - A payment made for transportation and necessary lodging and subsistence, which payment is made by the agency of an official, is not an honorarium or a gift. e. Travel In Connection With Bona Fide Business - A payment made for transportation, lodging, and subsistence, which payment is reasonably necessary in connection with a bona fide business trade, or profession, and which satisfies the criteria for federal income tax deductions for business expenses specified in Internal Revenue Code Sections 162 and 274, is not an honorarium or gift unless the sole or predominant activity of the business, trade or profession is making speeches. C. Prohibitions on receipt of honoraria 1. Basic Prohibition - Section 89502 provides that no elected officer of a local government agency nor any official listed in Section 87200 shall accept an honorarium. 2. Definition. An "honorarium" means any payment made in consideration for any speech given, article published, or attendance at any public or private conference, convention, meeting, social event, meal, or like gathering. 3. Summary of Exceptions to Prohibition 0" Honoraria a. Earned Income Exception - "Honorarium" does not include income earned for personal services if; {l) The services art: provided in connection with an individual's business or the individual's practice of or employment in a bona fide business, trade, or profession, such as teaching, practicing law, medicine, insurance, real estate, banking, or building contracting; and (2) the business, trade, or profession. The services are customarily provided in connection ",'ilh b. Informacion Materials - "Honorarium'. does not include information materials such as books, calendars, videotapes, or free or discounted admission to educational conferences that are provided to assist the official in the performance of official duties. c. Family Payments - "Honorarium" does not include a payment received from one's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-la\v, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle or first cousin or the spouse of any such person. However, a payment from any such person is an honorarium if the donor is acting as an agent or intermediary for any person not listed in this paragraph. d. required to be reported. Campaign contributions - However, campaign contributions are - 12000- rg 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86G\05-1 e. Personalized Plaque or Trophy - Honorarium does not include a personalized plaque or trophy with an individual value of less than two hundred and fifty dollars ($250). f. Admission and lncidentals at Place of Speech. "Honorarium" does not include free admission, refreshments and similar non-cash nominal benefits provided to an official during the entire event at which the official gives a speech, participates in a panel or seminar, or provides a similar service, and actual intrastate transportation and any necessary lodging and subsistence provided directly in connection with the speech, panel, semmar, or service, including but not limited to meals and beverages on the day of the activity. g. lncidentals at Private Conference - "Honorarium" does not include any of the following items, when provided to an individual who attends any public or private conference, convention, meeting, social event, meal, or like gathering without providing any substantive service: (I) Benefits, other than cash, provided at the conference, convention, meeting, social event. meal, or gathering. (2) Free admission and food or beverages provided at the conference, convention, meeting, social event, meal, or gathering. h. Travel That Is Exempt From Gifts - Any payment made for transportation, lodging and subsistence that is exempted by the gift exceptions. D. Prohibitions OD receipt of certain i)'pes of loans 1. Prohibition 011 Loans Exceeding $250 from Other Cit}" Officials, Emplo)'ees, Consultants and Contractors - Elected officials and other city officials specified in Section 87200, including city cmmcilmembers, may not receive a personal loan that exceeds $250 at any given time from an officer, employee, member or consultant oftheir city or any local government agency over which their city exercises direction and control {Section 87460 (a) and (b)). In addition, elected officials and other city officials specified in Section 87200 may not receive a personal loan that exceeds $250 at any given time from any individual or entity that has a contract with their city or any agency over which their city exercises direction and control (Section 87460 (c) and (d)). 2. Requirement for Loans of $500 or JJ.fore from Other Persons and Entities to be in Writing - Elected local officials may not receive a personal loan of $500 or more unless the loan is made in v.Titing and clearly states that terms of the loan. The loan document must include the names of the parties to the loan agreement, as well as the date, amount, interest rate, and term of the loan. The loan document must also include the date or dates when payments are due and the amount of the payments (Section 87461). - 13 of20- @ 2006 Richards. Watson & Gershon 869105-1 3. Exceptions to Loan Limits and Documentation Requirements - The following loans are not subject to the limits and documentation requirements specified in subparts I and 2 above: a. Loans received from banks or other financial institutions, and retail or credit card transactions, made in the Donnal course of business on tenns available to members of the public without regard to official status. b. Loans received by an elected officer's or candidate's campaign conunittee. c. Loans received from the elected or appointed official's spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, parent-in-law, brother-in~law, sister-in-law, nephew, niece, aunt, uncle, or first cousin, or the spouse of any such person unless he or she is acting as an agent or intennediary for another person not covered by this exemption. d. Loans made, or offered in writing, prior to January 1, 1998. 4. Loans that Become Gifts Subject to the Gift Prohibition - Under the following circumstances, a personal loan received by any public official (elected and other officials specified in Section 87200, as well as any other local government official or employee required to file a Statement of Economic Interest) may become a gift and subject to gift and reporting limitations: a. If the loan has a defined date or dates for repayment and has not been repaid, the loan will become a gift when the statute of limitations for filing an action for default has expired, b. If the loan has no defined date or dates for repayment, the loan will become a gift if it remains unpaid when one year has elapsed from the later of: (I) the date the loan was made; (2) the date the last payment of $1 00 or more was made on the loan; or (3) the date upon which the official has made payments aggregating to less than $250 during the previous 12-month period. s. Exceptions -- Loans that Do Not Become Gifts - The following loans will not become gifts to an official: a. A loan made to an elected officer's or candidate's campaign committee. - 14 of20- (Q 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 b. A loan on which the creditor has taken reasonable action to collect the balance due. c. A loan described above on which the creditor, based on reasonable business considerations, has not undertaken collection action. (However, except in a criminal action, the creditor has the burden of proving that the decision not to take collection action was based on reasonable business considerations.) d. A loan made to an official who has filed for bankruptcy and the loan is ultimately discharged in bankruptcy. e. A loan that would not be considered a gift as outlined in paragraph 3 above (e.g. loans from fanlily members) (Section 87462). E. Other specialized conflict of interest laws 1. Incompatible Outside Activities (Government Code Section 1126 et seq.) - California Government Code Section 1126 provides; "(a) Except as provided in Sections 1128 and 1129, a local agency officer or employee shall not engage in any employment, activity, or enterprise for compensation which is inconsistent, incompatible, in conflict with, or inimical to his or her duties as a local agency officer or employee or with the duties, functions, or responsibilities of his or her appointing power or the agency by whic.h he or she is employed. . . ." The provisions of Section 1126 prohibit officials and employees of a local government agency from engaging in outside employment or activities where any part of the employment or activity will be subject to approval by any other officer, employee, board or connnission of lhe local agency. Exceptions are created to permit a public official to engage in outside employment by a private business (Section 1127), and to pennit an attorney employed by a local agency in a non-elective position to serve on an appointed or elected governmental board of another agency (Section I t2S). However, the court in Ma::zola v. City and County of San Francisco, 112 Cal.App.3d ] 41 (I 980), ruled that Section 1126 provides only authorization to implement standards for incompatibility pursuant to paragraph (b) of Section 1126. The court concluded that the restrictions of Section 1126 are not self-executing because existing and future employees should have notice that specific outside activities are or are not compatible with their duties as an officer or employee of the local agency. Thus, Section 1126 would not bar a public official from holding a position outside their public agency unless the public agency in which he or she serves adopts an ordinance in compliance with the requirements of Section 1126 that specifies that the two positions or activities are incompatible. fn light of the court's decision in Mazzola, the Attorney General ruled that Section 1126 did not apply to any elected official, such as a city councilrnember, since elected officials do not - 15 ono. rg 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86910:'.\ have an "appointing power" that can promulgate guidelines for their activities pursuant to Section 1126. However, if a local agency adopts such guidelines, they can be made applicable to officers and employees subordinate to the legislative body of the local agency, including members of advisory boards and commissions. 2. Doctrine Against Incompatible Offices - The common law doctrine against incompatibility of offices arose from a concern that the public interest would suffer where one person holds two public offices that might possibly come into conflict. The California Supreme Court set forth the following test for incompatibility of office in People ex re!. Chapman v. Rapsey. 16 Cal.2d 636 (1940): "Two offices are said to be incompatible when the holder cannot in every instance discharge the duties of each. Incompatibility arises, therefore, from the nature of the duties of the offices, when there is an inconsistency in the functions of the two, where the functions of the two are inherently inconsistent or repugnant, as where antagonism would result in the attempt by one person to discharge the duties of both offices, or where the nature and duties of the two offices are such as to render it improper from considerations of public policy for one person to retain both." (16 Cal.2d at 641-642). Incompatibility of offices is not measured only by conflicts that do exist, but also by those conflicts that might arise (People ex rei. Chapman, 16 Cal.2d 636. 641-642 (1940); 66 Cal.Atty.Gen. 382. 384 (1983); 64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 288, 289 (1981)). In order to determine whether two positions are in conflict, it is necessary to determine first whether the positions are public offices. No statutory definition is given to the term "public officer." However, in People ex rei. Chapman v. Rapsey. supra, the court stated: "{A] public office is said to be the right, authority, and duty, created and conferred by law~the tenure of which is not transient, occasional, or jncidental~by which for a given period an individual is invested with power to perfonn a public function for public benefit . . . One of the prime requisites is that the office be created by the Constitution or authorized by some statute. And it is essential that the incumbent be clothed with a part of the sovereignty of the state to be exercised in the interest of the public." (citation) (16 CaL2d al640). Incompatibility can be triggered if the duties of the two offices "overlap so that their exercise may require contradictory or inconsistent action, to the detriment ofthe public interest." (People ex. reI. Bagshaw v. Thomson, 55 CaLApp.2d 147, 150 (1942)). Only one significant clash of duties and loyalties is required to make offices incompatible (37 Ops. Cat. Atty. Gen. 21,22 (1961). The policy set forth in People ex reI. Chapman v. Rapsey includes prospective as well as present clashes of duties and loyalties (63 Ops. CaL Atty. Gen. 623 (1980)). . 160f20- @2006 Richards, Wat~on & Gershon 869105-1 Disqualification of oneself from participating in those situations of potential conflict has not been authorized as a remedy for incompatible offices. The general rule provides: <<The existence of devices to avoid. .. [conflicts] neither changes the nature ofthe potential conflicts nor provides assurances that they would be employed (38 Ops. Ca/. Atty. Gen. 121, 125 (1961)). Accordingly, the ability to abstain when a conflict arises will not excuse the incompatibility or obviate the effects of the doctrine." (66 Gps. Cal. Atty. Gen. 176, 177 (1983)). The effect of the doctrine of incompatibility of offices is that a public official who enters upon the duties ofa second office must vacate the first office if the two are incompatible (People ex rei Chapman v. Rapsey, 16 Cal.2d 636, 644 (1940)). Government Code Section 1099, which codified the common law rule prohibiting an individual from holding incompatible offices, provides that offices are incompatible when any of the following circumstances are present, unless simultaneous holding of the particular offices is compelled or expressly authorized by law: a. Either of the offices may audit, ovenule, remove members of, dismiss employees of, or exercise supervisory powers over the other office or body; b. Based on the powers and jurisdiction of the offices, there is a possibility of a significant clash of duties or loyalties between the offices; c. Public policy considerations make it improper for one person to hold both offices. Government Code Section 1099 also provides that when two public offices are incompatible, a public officer shall be deemed to have forfeited the first office upon acceding to the second office. 3. Redevelopment Conflicts - Health and Safety Code Section 33130 requires any officer or employee of a city or redevelopment agency who is required to participate in the formulation of, or to approve plans or policies for, the redevelopment of a project area, to immediately disclose his or her ownership interest in any real property located within the proposed project area. This requirement applies to members of a city council, a planning commission and other officers and employees of a city or redevelopment agency. Failure to make the disclosure constitutes misconduct in office. Section 33130 also precludes any city or redevelopment agency official who is required to participate in the formulation of, or to approve plans or policies for, the redevelopment of a project area, from acquiring any interest in property located within the boundaries of the project area. This means that redevelopment agency employees and persons elected to the city council and serving as agency board members may not purchase property in the redevelopment agency's project area. Also, if the redevelopment agency conunences the process to establish a new project area, city and redevelopment agency employees and officials involved in redevelopment -170f20- It, 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 decisions are precluded from acquiring any additional or new interests in property within that new project area boundary. As discussed below, there are three exceptions to the prohibition against acqumng interests in property in a project area. Upon acquiring any interest under one of these exceptions, disclosure of the interest is required. The first exception allows an officer or employee to acquire an interest for the purpose of participating as an owner or re-entering into business if that officer or employee has owned a substantially equal interest to that being acquired for three years immediately preceding the setection oflhe project area (Section 33130(b)). The second exception allows an officer or employee to enter into a rental agreement or lease of property for the purpose of the principal business, occupation, or profession of the officer or employee. However, this exception is limited to rental agreements or leases that have terms substantially equivalent to those offered the general public. Also the rental agreement or lease may not allow the property to be sublet at a rate in excess of the rate in the original rental agreement or tease (Section 33130(c)). The third exception allows for the purchase or lease of property for personal residential use, but only after the redevelopment agency has certified that all construction or improvements to the property have been completed (Section 33130.5). 4. Discount Passes on Common Carriers (Califomia Constitution, Article XII, Section 7) - Article XII, Section 7 of the California Constitution states: "A transportation company may not grant free passes or discounts to anyone holding in office in this state; and the acceptance of a pass or discount by a public officer, other than a Public Utilities Commissioner, shall work a forfeiture of that office. A Public Utilities Commissioner may not hold an official relation to nor have a financial interest in a person or corporation subject to regulation by the commission." The Attorney General has explained this provision applies in the following Jllanner: a. The prohibition applies to public officers, both elected and nOll- elected, but not employees. b. The prohibition applies to interstate and foreign carriers as well as domestic carriers, and to transportation received outside California. .180f20- Ir) 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-1 c. The prohibition applies irrespective of whether the pass or discount was provided in connection with personal or public business, d, Violation of the prohibition is punishable by forfeiture of office. There have only been a few decisions that address this Constitutional prohibition. In one opinion, the Attorney General granted leave to sue two members of a city council who accepted free airline tickets to London given by Laker Airlines as part of the airline's promotion of its new Los Angeles to London service. Despite the fact that the councilmembers were unaware of the prohibition, the Attorney General allowed a quo warranto suit that subsequently settled before judgment (cited in 76 Op', Ca!. Atty. Gen. 1.3 (1993)). In another opinion, the mayor of a city received an upgrade from a coach seat to a first class seat on Hawaiian Airlines (76 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 1 (1993)). There, the mayor's ticket was one of20 first-class upgraded tickets that the airline was allowed to provide to "high profile, prominent members of the community." At issue was whether that situation fit within an exception to the constitutional prohibition for situations when the free transportation or discount is provided to a public officer as a member of a larger group unrelated to tIle official's position. The Attorney General ruled that the facts did not satisfy the exception and that a violation of the prohibition had occurred. The exception considered in that opinion stenuned out of a 1984 Opinion of the Attorney General, which held that a public officer could accept first-class ticket upgrades by virtue of the airline's policy to do so for all persons on their honeymoon. In 67 Ops. Cal. Atty. Gen. 81 (1984), the Attorney General concluded that a public officer, whose spouse \\fas a flight attendant, could accept a free transportation pass or discount when such was offered to all spouses of flight attendants without distinction to the official status of the recipient. Consequently, if the pass or discOlmt is provided to the official because of his or her position as a governmental official, the prohibition applies. If it is provided to the official as a member of a larger group that is not related to the functions of his or her office. the prohibition may not be applicable. 5. Prohibition Against Former Officials Lobbyingfor Compensation Effective July 1, 2006, Government Code Section 87406.3(a) requires that a local elected official or a city manager who held that position with a city shalt not, for a period of one year after leaving that office or employment, act as an agent or attorney for, or othef\\'ise represent, for compensation, any other person, by making any formal or infomlal appearance before or by making any oral or written communication to that city or any present member, officer or employee of that city if the appearance or communication is made for the purpose of influencing an administrative or legislative action. This rule also applies if the appearance or communication is made for the purpose of influencing any action or proceeding involving the issuance, amendment, awarding, or revocation of a permit, license, grant or contract, or the sale or purchase of goods or property. - 19 of20- (Q 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 869105-\ This prohibition against compensated lobbying does not apply to any individual who is, at the time of the appearance or communication, a board member, officer, or employee of another local government agency or an employee or representative of a public agency and is appearing or communicating on behalf of that agency. Ca!. Gov'! Code ~ 87406.3(b) Conclusion More often than not, detennining the application of conflict of interest laws in particular circumstances requires complicated analysis. Because the consequences for a violation of these laws can be very serious, it is important that potential conflicts be identified as soon as possible to ensure that the appropriate analysis can be perfonned. We encourage you to seek advice from our office whenever you are in doubt about a conflict of interest issue. - 20 of20- iQ 2006 Richards, Watson & Gershon 86~l05-1 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ITEM NO. 20 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ PJL ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Anthony Elmo, Director of Building and Safety DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Departmental Report - March 2006 PREPARED BY: Diane Ball, Administrative Assistant The month of March 2006 showed a gain of construction activity as compared to previous months. The following is an overview of permit and inspection activity for March. Sinqle Family Development - Tracts In March, the City issued 36 new single family home permits for a total square footage of 128,246. These homes are primarily in Wolf Creek which currently has 174 homes under construction in addition to 109 homes under construction in Harveston. There are a total of 434 single family homes under construction throughout the City at the current time. Custom Sinqle Family Homes As of March, we have 25 custom homes under construction for a total of 126,048 square feet. Multi-Family Development Temecula Ridge is in the building process with 21 buildings. Temecula Creek has completed most of their condo construction and have 9 buildings with 20 units each left to complete in the second phase. Cape May Apartments in Harveston is constructing 270 units and should be complete by July. Commercial Development There were 7 new commercial permits issued in March for a total valuation of $13,711 ,562. Plan check activity included submittals for Rancho Temecula Town Center at 39584 Winchester Road, Meadows Village at 31795 Rancho California Road, and Well's Fargo Bank at 32881 Highway 79 South. Total Permit and Inspection Activity During the month of March inspection staff performed 3,482 inspections and 375 permits were issued representing a construction valuation of $24,722,675. The total building permit and plan check fees collected in the month of March were $209,499.47. ITEM NO. 21 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager JM.r- /JIZ ~ (]jJ~ r- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: April2 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department for the month of March. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 88 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations including 8 applications for public hearings during the month of March. The new public hearing cases are as follows: MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAJOR MODIFICATION MINOR MODIFICATION EXTENSION OF TIME SIGN PROGRAM 2 1 2 1 1 1 Status of Maior Proiects New Proiects . Olive Garden - A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the sale of distilled spirits at a full service restaurant located at 29025 Overland Drive. The application was submitted on March 6, 2006. Staff anticipates a May Planning Commission hearing for the project. (PA06-0059- FISK) . DCH Chrysler Jeep - A Major Modification to a Development Plan to add building square footage under an existing canopy, to add a new parapet wall along the new building areas, and to revise the exterior wall configuration for the service writer area of the building located at 26799 Ynez Road. The application was submitted on March 16,2006 and is scheduled for an April 11 , 2006 DRC meeting. (PA06-0079 - FISK) . DCH Dodge - A Major Modification for the addition of 3,089 square feet of building area and fayade improvements for an existing 27,101 square foot building located on the west side of Ynez Road approximately 600 feet north of DLR Drive. The application was submitted on March 30, 2006 and is scheduled for a May 18, 2006 DRC meeting. (PA06-0082 - LINTON) . Beacon Auto Park - Sign Program to establish and implement for the Beacon Auto Park. This project is located at 421 03 Rio Nedo. The application was submitted on March 1,2006. A DRC letter will be sent to the applicant on April 13, 2006. (PA06-0057 - SCHUMA) . Career Gateway College - A Minor Conditional Use Permit submitted March 22, 2006 to conduct business at a professional school. This project is located at 43178 Business Park Drive. A DRC is scheduled April 20, 2006. (PA06-0074 - SCHUMA) . Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan PA4B -An Extension ofTime application submitted March 23, 2006 for a previously approved Home Product Review for the construction of 113 single family homes. This project is located within Planning Area 4B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Staff is currently reviewing the application and anticipates scheduling the project for the June 7, 2006 Planning Commission. (PA06-0079 - SCHUMA) . Redhawk Specific Plan PA 13 - A Development Plan application submitted on March 8, 2006 for a multi-family residential project to construct 98 condominium units on 8.9 acres. The project is located at the corner of Deer Hollow Way and Peach Tree Street. A DRC is scheduled April 13, 2006. (PA06-0060 - SCHUMA) . Mountain View Community Church - A Minor Modification submitted on March 9, 2006 to add four modular buildings to an existing site at Mountain View Community Church (formerly Hope Lutheran) located at 29385 Rancho California Road. DRC meeting was held on April 6,2006. Staff has drafted a comment letter. Staff is waiting for re-submittal of appropriate revisions. (PA06-0062 - LECOMTE) Recentlv Approved Proiects . Schafer Building - A Major Modification application to an approved Development Plan to change materials and add stucco to an approved building. The project is located at 41273 Margarita Road. This project was submitted October 5, 2005. The project was taken to the February 1, 2006 Planning Commission and was continued to the March 1,2006 hearing. This project was continued again to the March 15,2006 Planning Commission Hearing. The project was approved at the March 15, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-029- MCCOY) . Jefferson Avenue Inn - An Application for an Extension of Time of an approved Development Plan (PAOO-0507). PAOO-0507 is an approval for a three-story hotel building located on Jefferson Avenue. This project was approved at the March 15, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0312 - MCCOY) . Gupta Industrial Condo - A Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes to create five industrial condominium units in an existing building. The project was submitted on October 31,2005. The building is located at 41636 Enterprise Circle North. A DRC letter was mailed out on January 9,2006. Applicant resubmitted on March 8, 2006 and was approved at the March 30, 2006 Director's Hearing. (PA05-0330 - MCCOY) . Roripaugh Ranch PA4A EOT - An Extension of Time for a previously approved Home Product Review (Development Plan - PA03-0347) for the construction of 100 single-family homes located within Planning Area 4A of the Roripaugh Specific Plan. This project was submitted on December 19, 2005. The project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 15, 2006. (PA05-0391 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA3 Extension of Time - An Extension of Time application for a previously approved Home Product Review (Development Plan, PA03-0551 for Shea Homes) for the construction of 99 single-family homes located within Planning Area 3 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The application was submitted on January 23, 2006, and was approved at the April 5, 2006. (PA06-0022 - SCHUMA) . Temecula Lane -A Conditional Use permit, Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map to construct 59, four-plex buildings totaling 236 units, 32 three-plex buildings totaling 96 units, and 96 single-family detached units on a 47.5 acre site, located atthe northeast corner of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane. The project was submitted on August 8,2004. A DRC meeting was held with the applicant on October 21, 2004. Plan revisions were submitted on March 3, 2005. Staff provided revision comments to the applicant on March 31, 2005. The project was approved at the January 18, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. The project was appealed to City Council at the March 21, 2006 City Council Hearing where the Council upheld the Planning Commission decision. (PA04-0496- DAMKO) . Avis Car Rental- A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a rental car agency to operate within the Embassy Suites Hotel located at 29345 Rancho California Road. This project was submitted on January 23,2006. The project was approved at Director's Hearing on April 6, 2006. (PA06-0021 - NOLAND) . Budget Rent-A-Car-A MinorConditional Use Permitfora rental car agency to be located in the Adobe Plaza Shopping Center at 27645 Jefferson Avenue, Suite #113. This project was submitted on January 23,2006. This project was approved at the Director's Hearing of April 6, 2006. (PA06-0020 - NOLAND) . Temecula Glass Company - A Development Plan to construct an 11,271 square foot commercial building on .987 acres located at 41755 Enterprise Circle. The application was submitted on April 12, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on May 19, 2005. A DRC letter was sent on May 20,2005. Revised plans were submitted on December 7, 2005. This project was approved at the March 15, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0105- LINTON) . Temecula Creek Plaza Sign Program - A Comprehensive Sign Program for seven commercial/office/retail buildings at the southeast corner of Jedediah Smith Road and Highway 79 South. The application was submitted on February 9,2005. Comments were sent to the applicant on July 25, 2005. Revised comments were sent to the applicant on December 7, 2005. A revised sign program was submitted on January 18, 2006. This item was approved at the April 5, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA5-0040 - PAPP) . Plaza Rio Vista -A Development Plan to construct a 19,650 foot office building on .99 acres at the corner of Black Deer Loop and Diaz Road. The application was submitted on May 1 0, 2005. The DRC meeting was held on June 23, 2005. The Planning Commission recommended approval at the March 15, 2006 Hearing. The item is scheduled for the April 25, 2006 City Council Hearing. (PA05-0139 - LINTON) Proiects Under Review Commercial . Redhawk Car Wash and Tire Store - A Development Plan and a Conditional Use Permit submitted on June 8, 2005 for three buildings totaling 8,354 square feet used for a self-serve carwash and tire store. The project is located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and De Portola Road. A DRC meeting was held on August 18, 2005. A DRC letter was mailed on August 23, 2005. Applicant has been working with Staff on the design. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0172 - DAMKO) . Etco Plaza Sign Revision - The Application submitted on December 19, 2005, is a request to revise the existing sign program to allow additional signage and sign colors. Staff has scheduled the project for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing recommending denial. (PA05-0390 - DAMKO) . Paseo Del Sol Recreation Building - A Development Plan to construct a recreation center consisting of a 1,962 square foot building and swimming pool on 1.2 acres generally located on the north side of Sunny Meadows Drive, approximately 900 feet east of Meadows Parkway. The application was submitted on January 5, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on February 9, 2006. Revised plans were submitted on March 17, 2006. Staff anticipates a May Directors Hearing for the project. (PA06-0004 - FISK) . Pujol Condos - A Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes for a residential condominium project located approximately 1 ,800 feet south of First Street on the west side of Pujol Street. The application was submitted on July 7, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on September 1, 2005, and a DRC letter was mailed on September 1, 2005. Revised plans were submitted on October 26, 2005. A second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on December 13, 2005. A Development Agreement must be approved by City Council prior to Staff scheduling the project for a Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0209 - FISK) . Temecula Professional Building - A Development Plan to construct a 9,500 square foot office building on 0.91 acres located on the west side of Margarita Road, approximately 300 feet south of De Portola Road. The application was submitted on October 5,2005. A DRC was held on December 12, 2005, and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on December 12, 2005. A second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on February 24, 2006. Revised plans were submitted on March 23, 2006. A 30-day no response letter was sent to the applicant on March 13, 2006, and a 60-day no response letter was sent on April 3, 2006. Staff anticipates a May Director's Hearing for the project. (PA05-0297 - FISK) . YMCA - A Development Plan to construct a 38,540 square foot YMCA building within a 0.66 acre lease area of a 20.2 acre site located at 29119 Margarita Road. The application was submitted on November 29, 2005. Staff is currently reviewing the application. A DRC meeting was held on January 26, 2006. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans. (PA05-0365 - FISK) . Carpet One - A Development Plan submitted on January 19, 2006, for the construction of a 4,800 square foot retail building located in the Creekside Shopping Center on Highway 79 South and Pechanga Parkway. This project was scheduled for Pre-DRC on March 14, 2006, and DRC on March 16,2006. Comments were mailed to the applicant and Staff is waiting for revised plans. (PA06-0016 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . U-Store-It U-Haul Rentals - A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow U-Haul truck rentals at U-Store It located at 28401 Rancho California Road (APN 921-281-019). This project was submitted on November 15, 2005. A DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on December 28, 2005. Staff is waiting for response back from applicant. A 30-Day No Response letter was sent to applicant on January 31, 2006. Applicant has resubmitted revised plans on March 6, 2006. Staff is waiting on acceptable elevator for proposed covered carport. (PA05-0349 - LECOMTE) . Dr. Levi's Office and Retail - A Major Modification to renovate the former 5 & Diner into offices and retail facilities located at 26460 Ynez Road. The application was submitted on October 31, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on December 22, 2005. Staff is currently awaiting revised plans. (PA05-0329 - LINTON) . Lyndie Lane Speculative Building - A Development Plan to construct a 9,265 square foot commercial building located at 29748 Rancho California Road. The application was submitted on October 14, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on December 8,2005. Staff is currently awaiting revised plans. (PA05-0305 - LINTON) . Rite-Aid - A Minor Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience and Necessity application to sell alcohol within a 16,836 square foot retail facility to be located within the Rancho Temecula Town Center at the northeast corner of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road. The application was submitted on October 25, 2005. A Pre-DRC meeting was held on November 15, 2005. The applicant resubmitted on February 17, 2006. This item is scheduled for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission. (PA05-0314 - LINTON) . Rite-Aid Drive Thru - A Conditional Use Permit for a proposed pharmacy drive thru for the Rite-Aid within the Temecula Village. The project is located on Rancho California Road and Moraga. The application was submitted on January 20,2006. The project is scheduled for Planning Commission on April 19, 2006. (PA06-0019 - PAPP) . Temecula Community Church - A Conditional Use Permit application with a Development Plan for the addition of three buildings and the removal of existing modular buildings and trellises. The project is located at 28871 Santiago Road. The project was submitted on December 15, 2005. A DRC letter was sent out on February 3, 2006. The applicant resubmitted plans on March 13,2006. This project is tentatively scheduled for the May 17, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0389 - SCHUMA) . Down's Energy - A Development Plan application for a liquid natural gas distribution facility and a 14,776 square foot office speculative building. The project is located at the northwest corner of Rancho Way and Diaz Road. The project was submitted on December 22,2005. A DRC meeting was held on January 26, 2006. Staff is waiting for revised plans. (PA05- 0402 - SCHUMA) . Redhawk Pavillion - A Development Plan application for a proposed commercial center consisting of three buildings totaling 29,498 square feet located on the southeast corner of De Portola and Margarita (APN 959-050-006). The application was submitted on February 22,2006 and comments are due on March 22, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on April 6, 2006. Staff is awaiting for applicant to resubmit. (PA06-0046 - SCHUMA) . Ace Hardware at Creekside Plaza - A Development Plan for a proposed 13,125 square foot retail building (Ace Hardware) located at 30715 Highway 79 South, in the Creekside Plaza Shopping Center. The application was submitted on February 16, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on April 6, 2006. Comments were sent to the applicant and Staff is waiting for a resubmittal. (PA06-0044 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Frankie's Restaurant - A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the sale of distilled spirits at a full service steak and seafood restaurant located at 41785 Nicole Lane. The application was submitted on January 17, 2006. Staff anticipates an April Planning Commission Hearing for the project. (PA06-0011 - FISK) . Hine Mazda - A Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a 32,560 square foot automobile dealership to be located on 3.7 acres at the southwest corner ofYnez Road and DLR Drive. The application was submitted on February 22, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on March 9, 2006, and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on March 9, 2006. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans. (PA06-0048 - FISK) . Temecula Village - A Second Extension of Time for approved Development Plan application PAOO-0140. The project is located on the northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road. The application was submitted on November 16, 2005. The project is scheduled for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0352 - PAPP) Subdivisions . Parcel Map 28049 - An Application for an Extension of Time for Parcel Map 28049. The project site is located on the west side of Pujol Street, approximately 2,200 feet south of First Street. The application was submitted on October 13, 2005. Staff anticipates an April Director's Hearing for the project. (PA05-0304 - FISK) . Selby Parcel Map - A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 21.22 acres into six parcels at the east side of Ynez Road north of Rancho California Road and south of Solana Way. This project was submitted on January 6,2005. Comments were due January 28, 2005, and a Pre-DRC was held February 1,2005. A DRC was held February 10,2005, and a DRC letter was sent on February 10, 2005. On June 30, 2005, Staff requested additional information to complete an I nitial Study for this project. A DRC meeting was held August 4,2005. Revised plans were submitted on September 16, 2005. A third comment letter was mailed November 2,2005, with a third submittal received on September 15, 2005. This project is scheduled forthe April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0004 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA16-18 TTM - A Tentative Tract Map (No. 29368) to subdivide 100.07 gross acres into 399 lots (389 single-family residential lots) located in Planning Area 16, 17, and 18 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The application was submitted on December 7, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 7, 2006, and comments were mailed to applicant. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0375 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA 10 TTM - A Tentative Tract Map (No. 30766) to subdivide 8.1 gross acres into 15 lots (14 single-family residential lots) within Planning Area 10 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The project was submitted on December 12, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on January 26,2006, and comments were mailed to the applicant. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0384 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA19 TTM - A Tentative Tract Map (29367) to subdivide 28.03 gross acres into 27 lots (25 single-family residential lots and 2 open space lots) located in Planning Area 19 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The project was submitted on December 12, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 9, 2006, and comments were mailed to the applicant. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0384 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA 23and 24 TTM - A Tentative Tract Map (30768) to subdivide 21.5 gross acres into 123 lots (122 single-family residential lots/one open space lot) located in Planning Areas 24 and 25 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Minimum lot size is 4,000 square feet, with an average lot size of 5,443 square feet. The project was submitted on December 13, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on February 9,2006, and comments were mailed to the applicant. Staff is awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0387 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch PA33A - A Tentative Tract Map (No. 90767) to subdivide 10.96 gross acres into 15 lots (14 residential lots) located within Planning Area 33A in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (generally located at the terminus of Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road). The application was submitted on January 4,2006. A Pre-DRC meeting was held on February 21, 2006, and a DRC meeting was held on February 23, 2006. Comments were mailed to the applicant on February 27, 2006, and staff is currently awaiting resubmittal. (PA06-0002 - KITZEROW/PETERS) Industrial . Winchester Gilcrest - A Development Plan submitted on April 5, 2005, for a total of 55,956 square feet of industrial office/warehouse space in three, one story buildings. The project is located on the south side of Winchester Road, west of Diaz Road. A DRC was scheduled for May 12, 2005, and a DRC letter was mailed on May 17, 2005. Applicant resubmitted on October 5, 2005. Comment letter was sent on October 20, 2005. Applicant resubmitted on March 1, 2006. A Planning Commission Hearing is tentatively scheduled for May 3,2006. (PA05-0096 - DAMKO) . Asher Business Park - A Pre-Application for a proposed high-tech research and development campus consisting of six buildings totaling 62,209 square feet, located at the southeast corner of Calle Empleado and Winchester Road. Comments were due from other departments on January 10, 2006. The project is under staff review. A DRC was held on February9, 2006. Applicant has resubmitted revised site plans and staff is currentlywaiting for comments from other departments so applicant can formally submit a Development Plan Application. (PR05-0023 - LECOMTE) . Storage 2 U - U-Haul Rental- A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for U-Haul rentals at Storage 2 U, located at 27731 Diaz Road. The application was submitted on October 26, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on December 15, 2005. Staff is currently awaiting revised plans. (PA05-0318 - LINTON) Mixed Use/Residential . Barrington Product Review - A Development Plan submitted on December 18, 2005, for 130 single-family homes located within Tract 32437-1 ,2,3, -and, F of the Harveston Specific Plan located on Ynez Road and Date Street. A DRC letter was mailed on December 27, 2005. Staff is waiting for resubmittal. (PA05-0378 - DAMKO) . Temecula Lane II - A Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan and Vesting Tract Map submitted on December 20,2005, for the development of 297 multi-family residential units located on the southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road. A DRC meeting held on February2, 2006, and a DRC letter was mailed on February 9, 2006. Staff is waiting for applicant response. (PA05-0395, PA05-0396, PA05-0397 - DAMKO) . Rancho Highlands III-A Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Map submitted on December 21, 2005, to allow a subdivision for condominium purposes and development of 137 multi-family units located near the northeast corner of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road. A DRC was held on February 16, 2006, and a DRC letter was mailed on March 3, 2006. Staff is waiting for the applicant's response (PA05-0398, PA05- 0399, PA05-0400 - DAMKO) . Dalton III-A Conditional Use Permit / Development Plan submitted on February 7,2006, for a 22,522 square foot mixed use building located on Fifth Street within the Old Town Specific Plan. A DRCwas held on March 2, 2006, and the DRC letter was mailed on March 3, 2006. The project is scheduled forthe April 10, 2006 Old Town Local Review Board and a May 17, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA06-0037 - DAMKO) . Tierra Vista Condominiums - An Administrative Development Plan to construct 23 residential condominiums on 1.5 acres. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Tierra Vista Road and Ynez Road. The application was submitted on September 30, 2003. Revised plans were submitted on July 7, 2004. A second DRC letter was provided on September 10, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on February 7,2005. A third DRC letter was provided to the applicant on April 8, 2005. Revised plans were received on August 2, 2005. Staff is currently awaiting submittal of correspondence from the county geologist regarding earthquake fault line setbacks. (PA03-0552 - FISK) . Pujol Condos - A Development Plan to construct nine multi-family condominium buildings totaling 134,213 square feet on 7.85 acres located on the west side of Pujol Street, approximately 1,800 feet south of First Street. The application was submitted on July 21 , 2005. A DRC meeting was held on September 1 , 2005, and a DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on September 1, 2005. Revised plans were submitted on October 26, 2005. A second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on December 13, 2005. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans. A 30-day no response letter was sent to the applicant on March 15, 2006 and a 60-day no response letter was sent on April 3, 2006. (PA05-0208 - FISK) . Renaissance Villages - A Residential Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map to construct 58 condominium units totaling 78,397 square feet on 3.98 acres generally located on Pujol Street, approximately 100 feet north of Main Street. The application was submitted on August 3, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on September 26, 2005, and a DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on September 27,2005. Revised plans were submitted on October 26, 2005. A Development Agreement must be approved by City Council prior to Staff scheduling the project for a Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0229 - FISK) . Mira Loma PDO -A Planned Development Overlay to change the zoning ofa 7.24 acre site from High Density Residential (H) to PDO -11 to change the development standards forthe site. The project site is located at 29601 Mira Loma Road. The project was submitted on August 8, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on September 29, 2005, and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on October 4, 2005. A second DRC meeting was held on February 16, 2006. A second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on February 24, 2006. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans. (PA05-0234 - FISK) . Naron Pacific Tentative Tract Map 30434-A proposal for a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 32 gross acres into 13 residential and 2 open space lots in the Chaparral area. The application was originally submitted on April 18, 2002. The CAD has made a recommendation on policy for the Chaparral Area allowing one-half acre lots if it does not increase the "net" density. Staff met with applicant in April to discuss grading issues and begin preparation of an Initial Study. An environmental constraint map was submitted on February 9, 2005. Staff met with the applicant on March 22, 2005 to discuss grading impacts and received revised plans and constraints map. A letter was mailed to the applicant on April 7, 2005, informing him that the submitted plans are not adequate, the project is still considered incomplete, and additional information is still required in order to proceed with processing. Staff met internally on April 8, 2005, to discuss General Plan update. A letter was sent to the applicant on April 13, 2005, to explain City Council decision not to modify Chaparral Policy; therefore, project plans must be revised to adhere to existing policies within the General Plan. Staff is currently awaiting submittal of revised plans. A 30- day close-out letter was sent certified mail to the applicant on September 16, 2005, and the applicant requested additional time to revise plans. A 60-day follow up letter was mailed on January 23, 2006. Required studies were submitted on March 23, 2006. Staff is currently reviewing and comments are due on April 12, 2006. (PA02-0204 PA02-0193 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . R. Alison TM -A Tentative Tract Mapto subdivide 3.71 acres into 11 residential lots located at 31670 Rancho California Road. The application was submitted on June 9, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on July 21, 2005, and a letter was mailed to the applicant on August 1, 2005. The applicant submitted revised plans. A second DRC letter was sent on January 30, 2006. Staff is awaiting revised plans. (PA05-0176 - LINTON) . Woodcreek Apartments - A Minor Modification application to build 35 tenant covered parking spaces/garage ports to be located at 42200 Moraga Road. The application was submitted on May 31, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on July 14, 2005. Revised plans were submitted on August 4, 2005. A second DRC letter was sent on August 25, 2005. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans. (PA05-0160 - LINTON) . Silver Oaks - A Development Plan/Tentative Tract Map to construct 112 age restricted condominiums on 7.5 acres on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Dartola Road. The project was submitted on August 9, 2005. A third DRC was held on February 23,2006. The project is tentatively scheduled for a May 17, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0235, PA05-0236 - LINTON) . Tentative Tract Map 32780 - A Tentative Tract Map to divide 22.45 acres into 38 single- family lots on Walcott Lane north of La Serena. The project was submitted on August 10, 2005, and is awaiting applicant response. A DRC meeting was held and a DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on December 13, 2005. The project is tentatively scheduled for a June 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0240 - SCHUMA) . PA 13 Redhawk - A Development Plan application to build 98 condominium units on 8.9 acres. The project is located on the northeast corner of Peachtree and Deer Hollow (APN 962-020-012). The project was submitted on March 8, 2006, and comments are due on April 5, 2006. A DRC meeting is scheduled for April 13, 2006. (PA06-0060 - SCHUMA) . Stonebriar - Wolf Creek - A Home Product Review for 112 single-family homes in PA21 of the Wolf Creek Specific Plan. Elevations include three floor plans and elevation types ranging from 3022 to 3446 square feet. Application was submitted November 4, 2005. A DRC letter was sent out on December 27, 2005. The applicant resubmitted plans on March 8,2006, and comments were due on due on March 22, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on March 30, 2006. Staff is awaiting resubmittal of revised plans. (PA05-0332 - FISK) . Rancho Highlands Maravilla - A Development Plan and Product Review for 71 tri-plex buildings totaling 213 units on 23.3 acres in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan along the extension of Tierra Vista and Rancho Highlands Road (APN 944-330-001, 003 and 017). The applications were submitted on June 6, 2005. A DRC meeting was held on July 14, 2005. Staff is currently preparing an I nitial Study for this project. This project has been scheduled for the May 3,2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0167 - PAPP) . Harveston Product Review, Emery Place -A Development Plan (Product Review) submitted on February 28, 2006, for 76 single-family cluster homes located within Tract 32436-1 and 32436-F of the Harveston Specific Plan (Noah and Date Street). Staff has tentatively scheduled a June 7,2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA06-0055 - DAMKO) Miscellaneous . Cingular Mono-Pine Wireless Antenna - A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 50-foot high monopalm on Greentree Road, approximately 500 feet east of Via Sierra. The project was submitted on April 19, 2004. Staff has received third-party review comments. Staff has postponed scheduling the project for a Planning Commission Hearing at the applicant's request. Plans have been submitted for a Planning Commission Hearing and Staff anticipates a June Planning Commission Hearing for the project. (PA04-0285 - FISK) . Margarita Crossings - A Sign Program for the proposed Margarita Crossings Shopping Center located at the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Overland Drive. The application was submitted on March 1,2005. A DRC letter was sent on March 28, 2005, and staff met with the applicant to review the DRC comments on April 22, 2005. The applicant submitted a revised sign program on July 1,2005. The project was heard at the September 21, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing and was continued to the December 7, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing so that the applicant could revise the program and address the Planning Commission concerns. The sign program was approved at the December 14, 2005 Planning Commission Hearing. The applicant has filed an appeal of the Conditions of Approval placed on the project. The appeal was scheduled for the April 11 , 2006, Council Hearing, but the appeal has been withdrawn by the applicant. (PA05-0064 - FISK) . Doghouse/Lolita Road Monopalm Wireless Antenna - A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 50-foot high monopalm with 12 panel antennas, on two-inch microwave dish, a shelter to match residence, a generator pad for emergency use, and two live palm trees with irrigation located at 30984 Lolita Road. The application was submitted on June 24, 2005. A DRC letter was mailed on July 23,2005. This project was resubmitted in November and a second DRC letter was sent December 16, 2005. A meeting was held with the applicant on January 26, 2006. Staff is currently awaiting resubmittal. (PA05-0195 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch Mega Center - A Development Plan for the Roripaugh Mega Center including a 16,343 square foot Community Center, a 1,414 square foot restroom/pool equipment building, and a 640 square foot cabana totaling 18,397 square feet on 3.88 acres in PA 30 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The project was submitted on November 14,2005, and comments were mailed to the applicant on December 29,2005. The project was resubmitted on January 25,2006. Comments were sent to the applicant on February 28,2006, and revised plans were submitted on March 17, 2006. Staff is currently reviewing. (PA05-0345 - KITZEROW/PETERS) . General Kearney Reservoir Wireless Facility - A Conditional Use Permit to replace an existing non-disguised unmanned wireless monopole with a new 65 foot tall unmanned wireless mono pine with 12 antennas, four-foot diameter microwave dish and associated 336 square foot shelter and a back-up generator. The property is east of Placer Lafite and south of Chemin Coutet. The application was submitted on March 1,2005. A DRC meeting was held on April 21 ,2005. A second meeting was held on January 24,2006. Staff is currently awaiting revisions. (PA05-0063 - LINTON) . T -Mobile Monopine - An application for a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 70 foot mono pine within a 676 square foot enclousure, to be located at Orchard Christian Fellowship, 42101 Moraga Road. The application was submitted on January 26, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on March 9, 2006. Staff is currently awaiting submittal of revised plans. (PA06-0026 - LINTON) . Brightstart Daycare - A Minor Conditional Use Permit for a large family childcare proposed in a 1,639 square foot home located at 31862 Via Barraza. This project was submitted on July 26, 2005, and is currently under review. A DRC meeting was held on September 1, 2005, and a DRC letter was sent on September 13, 2005. Staff is still awaiting applicant response. (PA05-0213 - SCHUMA) . Butterfield Station Sign Program - To establish and implement a sign program for the Butterfield Station shopping center. The property is located on Highway 79 South and Butterfield Stage Road. The application was submitted on October 4,2005. A revised sign program was submitted on March 9, 2006. This project is scheduled for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing. (PA05-0294 - PAPP) . Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan EIR Addendum - An EIR Addendum to the Certified Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan for offsite improvements including the Nicolas Road Bridge and related Channel Improvements to Santa Gertrudis Creek. The application was submitted on February 24, 2006. Staff is reviewing and will provide comments by April 15, 2006. (PA06-0051 - KITZEROW /PETERS) . Roripaugh Ranch Conditions of Approval Modification - A Major Modification to Conditions of Approval for Tracts 29661 (Conditions of Approval Nos. 17, 19, and 27), Tract 29353 (Condition of Approval 15), and Tract 32004 (Condition of Approval Nos. 8, 9,10,24,37,38, and 39) relative to issuance of building permits and timing of landscaping bonds for Roripaugh Ranch. The application was submitted on February27, 2006. Staff is reviewing and will provide comments by April 10, 2006. (PA06-0053 - KITZEROW/PETERS) Small Business Assistance . Wine Sellars - An Administrative Development Plan for an outdoor dining area has been submitted for this wine tasting facility at the southeast corner of Sixth Street and Old Town Front Street (The Hitching Post Center) in Old Town Temecula. Staff is waiting for a response from the owner and applicant to a comment letter that was sent to them outlining the requirements for the Public Works and Community Services Departments. (PA05'{)269 - NOLAND) . The Golf Store - Planning staff is working with the owner of this Old Town business to develop new signs that are consistent with the sign program for the Penfold Building. (PA05-0340 - NOLAND) . Bob & Gary's Field Fresh Berries - Staff is working with this applicant for approval of a Major Temporary Use Permit to establish a strawberry stand in the Palomar Shopping Center at Margarita Road and Rancho California Road. (PA06-00n - NOLAND) . Lonnie Smith Construction - A new sign and landscaping plan has been proposed for this new commercial office use in Old Town Temecula. This project is tentatively scheduled to go before the Old Town Local Review Board on May 8, 2006. (PA06-0072 - NOLAND) Special Event Permits . Bluegrass Festival- A Major Temporary Use Permit was approved for this Old Town event organized by the Redevelopment Department that took place on March 18, and 19, 2006. Staff coordinated comments from all concerned City departments and held an organizational meeting. (PA06-0029 - NOLAND) . 2006 Rock'n Rod Run & Old Town Cruise - Staff worked with P & R Productions to help them with a Major Temporary Use Permit for this Old Town Event that took place on March 10 and 11, 2006. A site plan for the event was developed and organizational meetings with the applicant were held on a regular basis. (PA06-0007 - NOLAND) . Painted Parasol Festival - The Redevelopment Department has applied for a Major Temporary Use Permit for this event scheduled for April 22, 2006 in Old town Temecula. Vendors, entertainment and children's activities are included. (PA06-0081 - NOLAND) . MS Walk - The National MS Society has applied for a Major Temporary Use Permit for a walk that will take place at City Hall and the streets of the Rancho California Business Park on April 22, 2006. A license agreement has been signed by the applicant for the use of all City facilities. (PA06-0080 - NOLAND) Special Proiects & LonQ RanQe PlanninQ Activities The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities currently in progress are described in the paragraphs below: . Medical Marijuana Dispensaries Ordinance - An Ordinance amending the Municipal Code defining "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" and prohibiting such use in all zones of the City. This item went to the April 5, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing and is scheduled for the April 25, 2006 City Council Hearing. (WEST) . Development Code Clean-Up Amendment - Staff has finalized the proposed amendment to the Development Code. The proposed amendment includes amending front yard setback requirements in residential districts, integrating state law requirements for density bonuses and creating new sign standards for existing developments, and other minor modifications and clarifications. This item went to the April 5, 2006 Planning Commission Hearing and is tentatively scheduled to City Council in May. (PA05-0041 - WEST) . Old Town Specific Plan Amendment - Staff has finalizing the draft amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to expand the protection for historic structures throughout the City, as well as make a number of other clarifications related to alleys, signage, and mixed use projects within the Old Town Area. This item is scheduled for the April 19, 2006 Planning Commission meeting. (PA04-0596 - WEST) . Mixed Use Development Standards and Traditional Neighborhood Design Criteria - Staff has started the development process for Mixed Use Development Standards by reviewing existing projects and guidelines. This is expected to result in a recommended approach for areas of the City that are designated for Mixed Use development. (WEST) . Hillside Development Policy - The policies are being examined for integration into the draft- grading ordinance. Staff is working with GIS to analyze topography, soil types, environmental (habitat), and other constraints. . Procedures to Implement CEQA - Staff initiated project to develop local guidelines and procedure manual for processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of local exemptions. This is expected to include significance thresholds and procedures for the City to contract for the preparation of environmental impact reports. . Project environmental reviews and permitting: .:. Diaz Road General Plan Level Improvements - Staff has prepared an Initial Study to determine the impacts of constructing ultimate improvements on Diaz Road. Staff is recommending that a Negative Declaration be prepared, the scheduling of this item for the City Council will be coordinated with Public Works Department. (EA07 - PAPP) .:. 1-15/ SR79 South Ultimate Interchange Project - Staff continues to provide comments to the Public Works Department on the issues that need to be addressed in the NEPA/CEQA document that is to be prepared for this project. (EA111 - WEST) .:. Civic Center Initial Environmental Study - Staff is reviewing the proposed Civic Center and Mercedes Street improvements pursuant to CEQA guidelines. (EA125 - WEST) .:. Rancho Vista Sidewalk Project - Staff is reviewing the proposed sidewalk improvement project along Rancho Vista Road pursuant to CEQA guidelines. (EA126 - WEST) General Plan Amendments . Map 32780 - A General Plan amendment to amend the Land Use Designation from Very Low (VL) to Low Density (L) for a 22.45 acre parcel located on Walcott Lane north of La Serena (APN 957-170-032-033-034-035-036). This application was submitted on August 13, 2005. A DRC is scheduled for November 15, 2005. A DRC was held and a DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on December 13, 2005. (PA05-0283 - SCHUMA) ITEM NO. 22 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ 11/2 tf CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 25, 2006 SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the attached Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Reports for the month of March, 2006. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report March I April 2006 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: April 25, 2006 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. Old Town Community Theatre This project will construct a 20,000 square foot community theater complex and refurbishes the existing Mercantile Building. Construction started on 3-3-04. This project is complete. The grand opening took place on 10/04/05. Punch list items and close out items will likely be on-going for next one to two months. In the process of negotiating disputed work items. 2. Fire Station - Northeast Site (Roripaugh Ranch) This project will construct a new fire station in the north part of the City. Contract completion date is March 2006. Work is focused on punch list items. Although the station will be complete in March, it will be roughly 6 to 12 months before the Roripaugh Ranch Developer can provide access and utilities to the site. As a result, there will be a cost to re-mobilize and complete the project when the aforementioned items are complete, which the Developer is responsible for. In addition, a fire engine/truck venting system (requested added on 2/06) will be installed when the Contractor is re- mobilized. 3. Winchester Road Widening Between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson This project will widen Winchester road between Enterprise Circle and Jefferson Avenue. It will also add a right turn lane from Eastbound Winchester to Southbound Jefferson, starting at Enterprise Circle. The project is complete. Roadway improvements accepted at City Council meeting on 4/11/06. 4. Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park A new 40+ Acres sports complex will be built at the corner of Pechanga Parkway and Deer Hollow Way. Bids were opened on September 16, 2004. The contract was awarded to Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. at the September 28, 2004 Council meeting. The contract award amount is $13,365,055.51. Many of the remaining items of work are unchanged from the last two months, though the quantity has been further reduced, and include scattered areas of concrete f1atwork, some stairways at ball fields, basketball baskets & boards, shade structure fabric, walkway lighting, playground lighting, equipment, and resilient surfacing, BBQs, basketball court and parking lot striping, and landscaping. Work completed since last month includes setting ball field scoreboards, building interior finishes, and planting of approx. 20% of trees. Periods of heavy rain throughout the month of March resulted in site work being possible on only 9 of 23 available working days. The Contractor's request for contract days extension, which will likely extend contract completion into May, is still under review by the City. When weather has permitted working, the landscape contractor's performance has improved markedly from previous months. 5. Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf As part of the sports park project, a separate contract to install synthetic turf on four fields, three soccerfields and a championship field that includes football overlay, was awarded to Byrom-Davey. Project acceptance is postponed until the contractor completes all the required work on all the fields. 6. Temecula Library A full service library, approximately 34,000 square feet in area, has been designed and will be built on Pauba Road, just west of Fire Station #84. The City was successful in obtaining State grant to aid in funding the library. The structural steel is has all been erected and welding is scheduled for completion by 4/17/06. The metal decking is being installed and will be complete by 4/21/06. The parking lot is now scheduled for paving at the end of April. Work continues on the buildings interior including framing, plumbing, fire sprinklers, ductwork and electrical rough in. Scaffolding is set on the south side of the building and the lath and plaster will follow. 7. City Field Operations Center (Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard) - Phase 1 Under this project, an expansion of the maintenance facility will be built on the property adjacent to City Hall. Western Rim Constructors (WRC) was awarded the project with a low bid of $636,094.80. The pre-con meeting was held on 10-6-05. Notice To Proceed was issued on 10-10-05. There will be 100 working days. The construction activities are moving along per schedule. The contractor has placed all curb & Gutter. Placement of base will be done by 04-14-06. Paving is scheduled for Saturday 04-15-06 (if it does not rain on Friday-forecast is 80% chance of rain). Landscaping work is moving along. Project completion is scheduled for 05-01-06. 8. Guardrail Installation and Replacement On Rainbow Canyon Road In this project, old guardrails will be replaced and new guardrails will be installed in needed locations on Rainbow Canyon Road within the City of Temecula. Bids were opened 10/27/05. Apparent low bidder was D.C Hubbs Construction with a bid amount of $245,325.00. The City Council awarded construction contract to D.C. Hubbs Construction on 11/22/05. Construction is complete. The City Council accepted the project 04/11/06. 9. Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II (Margarita Road to Showalter Road) This project will widen Pauba Road from Showalter to just west of Margarita Road to its ultimate width. Bids were opened on 01/09/06. Apparent low bidder was Grade Pros Inc. DBA McKenna with a bid amount of $1 ,367,663.15. Construction contract was awarded at the City Council meeting on 01/24/06. The Preconstruction Meeting was held on 02/15/06. The construction began on 02/27/06. Contractor has mobilized. They are working on erosion control, traffic control and grading. 10. Pavement Rehabilitation Program - FY 2005/2006 This project will rehabilitate Diaz Road between Rancho California Road and Winchester road, including replacement of storm drain pipes. City Council awarded the construction contract to R.J. Noble Company on 03/28/06. The Preconstruction meeting is scheduled for early May with construction beginning in mid May. 11. Citywide Concrete Repairs FY 05-06 This project will remove and replace various concrete improvements including sidewalk, curb and 2 gutter, cross gutters, driveways approaches, and under sidewalk drains. This project will remove and replace various concrete improvements including sidewalk, curb and gutter, cross gutters, driveways approaches, and under sidewalk drains. Contract was awarded on 03/21/06. 12. Temecula Education Center- Rough Grading This project will provide for the grading of the proposed Temecula Education Center. Project was awarded on 4/11/06. Construction is scheduled to begin May 1,2006. Staff is working with the utilities companies to resolve the long term feasibility of their facilities on Diaz Road from Dendy (Campus) Pkwy to Cherry Street. 13. State Route 79 South Medians Under this project medians will be constructed on Route 79 South within the City of Temecula limits. Award for the Construction Contract is going to the City Council on April 25th. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS 1. Rancho California Median Modifications This project will add an additional through-lane on Rancho California between Ynez Road and the 1- 15. The landscape median will be modified in order to accomplish this; no additional R!W will be needed. Authorization to solicit bids took place on 3/21. JMD submitted mylars on 3/23 and the plans & specs went out to bid; bids are due 4/24/06. Contract will be awarded on the 5/9 CC mtg. The City ordered the traffic signal pole on 3/31; approx. delivery time is 10-12 wks. This work will be performed at night. 2. Bridge Fencing Fences will be installed on bridges over 1-15. Proposed fencing locations are the eastbound sides of the Overland Drive and Rancho California Road bridges over Interstate 15. Construction bids are expected to be opened on 04/20/06 and awarded on 05/09/06. PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pechanga Parkway Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pala Road) to its ultimate width from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The Preliminary Environmental Document (NEPA) of the project is classified as a Categorical Exclusion with required technical studies (involving Federal action). Caltrans (Local Assistance) has approved the noise, traffic, and HPSR-ASR studies. The City expects the following environmental documents to be approved during the week of April 17: Air Quality, NES/MI, and the ISA (Hazardous Waste) Studies. The City recently filed the final CEQA- NOD for the project. The City is expecting minor comments from Caltrans during the week of April 10. The City will then resubmit to Caltrans during the week of April 17 for final approval. Once Caltrans (Local Assistance) approves the Environmental Document (ED) and PS&E package, they will submit the ED and PS&E package to FHWA for their review period of approximately 3 to 4 weeks. After FHW A approves the ED and PS&E package, the City can then start the public bid 3 process and proceed with the acquisition of three properties along Pechanga Parkway. 100% design plans (Mylars) will be signed by the City during the week of April 21. 2. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road This project will entail alignment studies and the design of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, which includes a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. The project includes the widening of Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, and the extension of Overland Drive across Murrieta Creek to Diaz Road. Coordination with RCFC & WCD and the Corp of Engineers is required. The City sent copies of the 70% design plans to the utility companies for comments during the week of April 3. Also, staff will send copies of the 70% design plans to other City Departments for comments during the week of April 1 O. 3. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site A 9,000 SF fire station will be built @ the corner of Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek Drive South. STK submitted the 1st 100% CD submittal on 8/05 & are currently addressing the 4th plan check comments & will resubmit in April. The developer is processing a legal description to identify a new parcel for the monument wall. They are scheduled to start wall construction before the construction of the fire station. The wall shall be on a separate parcel (owned & maintained by the HOA). Vanir was selected to provide CM services; it goes to CC on 4/25. The Fire Permit application has been submitted. 4. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail This project will build portions of the equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek within City limits. The City has received a federal grant of $1 ,214,000. Caltrans (the administrator of the federal funds) has given the City the "Authorization to Proceed with Preliminary Engineering." The City is working with Caltrans, US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Riverside County Flood Control to coordinate the trail design with the Murrieta Creek Improvement project. The signed Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (approved environmental document) was received from Caltrans on April 15, 2005. Final Design is underway and the 90% Plans were reviewed and comments returned to Kimley-Horn, the design consultant. The next submittal was received in late September and comments were returned to K-H on Oct. 19, 2005 for revision. Revised Plans and Specifications were received in late December 2005 and were reviewed by City staff. Comments went back to the Consultant for revisions. The City has received construction authorization from Caltrans. 5. Rancho California Road Widening, Old Town Front Street to 1-15 (Southside) This project will provide a right turn lane for southbound 1-15 motorists and provide a dual left turn lane from westbound RCR to southbound Front Street. The Caltrans permit is being finalized, with the consultant addressing final plan check comments. Caltrans delays/issues are impacting the scheduled start date. We anticipated final clearance of the plans in April/May of 2006. Union 76 and Denny's have approved their right of entries. 6. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement) This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. A meeting was held on 8/24/05 with Corps of Engineers regarding pursuing the project as stand-alone. Design consultant Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) is continuing to pursue environmental permitting and coordination issues associated with pursuing the bridge replacement as a project separate from the Corps of Engineer's channel improvement project. SWE has also revised their original design proposal for 4 this project in light of these additional efforts required; additional funding will be required to cover these revisions. A meeting was held with SWE on 3/16/06 to discuss the revisions and compare to scope of original contract. A decision is forthcoming on a contract amendment. 7. City Field Operations Center (Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard) - Phase 2 This project will construct the second phase of the City's Field Operation Center, which include the building. SCE advised that the existing conduit to City Hall transformer may be used for primary electrical feed. The consultant is addressing final plan check comments and technical spec comments and anticipates submitting mylars the week of March 20. 8. Diaz Road Extension to Cherry Street This project was previously "On-hold'" pending data from Riverside County Flood Control. With the construction of the proposed Education Center, this project has become developer driven. Plans have been routed to various utilities for identification of possible conflicts and to Riverside Flood Control and Army Corp of Engineers for verification that the proposed roadway is in conformance with the proposed detention basin within Murrieta Creek. 9. Santa Gertrudis Bicycle/ Trail Undercrossing at Margarita Road This project will construct a trail for bicycles and pedestrians along Santa Gertrudis Creek under Margarita Road. Data regarding existing utilities are being incorporated into the design. Consultant is continuing the environmental review process while City staff reviews the 100% plan submittal. 10. Western Bypass Corridor Alignment Study This project will provide for an alignment stud for the Western Bypass Corridor. A kick-off meeting is scheduled for April 20, 2006 with the design consultant URS Corporation. 11. Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek This project involves the design and environmental clearance of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the terminus of SR-79S and an extension of Pujol Street to the new structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly connection of the Western Bypass Corridor. Staff has completed review of a proposal by TV-UN International, and provided comments for consideration. A revised proposal is expected late April. 12. Localized Storm Drain Improvements This project will fix the drainage problem at the south end of Front Street (at the MWD easement). Baseline right of way, utilities, and mapping are established. This project is currently on hold. 13. Long Canyon Detention Basin -Access Road This project will construct an access road to the Long Canyon Detention Basin. Plans and specifications are 90% completed, however winter rains have affected the project conditions and the scope of work will need to be reevaluated. Project is on hold. 14. Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk This project involves design and environmental clearance of a new sidewalk along the south side of Rancho Vista Road between Ynez Road and Mira Loma Drive (east). The Planning Department is 5 examining a Categorical Exemption under CEQA. PS&E is 40% complete. 15. Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis Creek This projeclincludes the construction of an approx. 200' ped/bike bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek near Chaparral H.S. An RFP was sent out; three proposals were submitted. All included costs that were beyond the budgeted amount for the project. The City processed an agreement with Nolte Associates for a "Preliminary Planning Study" to further review the available alternatives & potential costs on the project and re-budget accordingly. The kick-off meeting with Nolte was held in Feb; next meeting took place March 28th. Nolte expects to submit their final report identifying bridge alternates, costs & their recommendations, at the end of April. This is a federally funded project, which will involve specific steps/actions to environmentally clear it. 16. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal & Desiltation Pond This project includes restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and the RWQCB by desilting the channel & pond located near the Sports Park. An internal meeting took place in Dec, 2005 to clarify the scope of work. Internal research is continuing. Communication has been made with US Army Corps of Engineers to determine what permits will be required; Staff is completing a Nationwide Permit application. 17. Slurry Seal Project FY 2005-2006, Redhawk Area' This project includes cleaning & sealing cracks in the road surface, removal & replacement of all pavement delineation, furnishing & installing Rubberized Emulsion - Aggregate Slurry (REAS) Type II and all necessary traffic control. There are approx, 3,571,850 sf of roadway involved. Bid authorization was given on 1/24/06. Bids were opened on 2/21/06. All American Asphalt was the lowest bidder w/a bid of $563,690.50. Award of contract took place 3/21/06. The Pre-Con meeting is set for 4/13/06. This work cannot start until May, 2006 or as directed by the City (weather dependent). 18. Erie Stanley Gardner Exhibit This project will create an exhibit for the famous author in the museum. Newly down-scoped construction plans were just submitted by the architect. These plans are being reviewed. The project will be advertised for bids once the plans and specifications are finalized. PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE 1. 1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange - Project Report (PR) This project will modify the 1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic. This is the next step of project development after the completion of the Project Study Report. City continued development of design geometrics and environmental technical studies. Status is as follows: ).> 1st submittal of Project Report - Received comments by Caltrans; City is addressing comments. ).> 2nd submittal of Design Exceptions - Received comments by Caltrans; City is addressing comments. 6 ).> 2nd submittal of Storm Water Data Report - Under review by Caltrans. ).> 2nd submittal of Natural Environmental Study (MI) - Under review by Caltrans. ).> 2nd submittal of Visual Impact Analysis - Under review by Caltrans. ).> 3rd submittal of Traffic Analysis - Under review by Caltrans. 2. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 split. The project is moving through the Caltrans process. Comments for Geometric Approval Drawings (GAD) have been addressed and resubmitted to Caltrans for review on 04-11-06. The Draft Project Report has been submitted for review. Draft Visual Analysis has been submitted to Caltrans for review. Utility conflict plans have been prepared and copies submitted to utility companies for review. New Connection Report, Draft Project report, Fact Sheets and Traffic Analysis have been submitted to FHWA for review. R!W data sheet is being prepared. 3. French Valley Parkway Interim Southbound Off-Ramp to Jefferson, Auxiliary Lane, and Widening the Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester Southbound Off-ramp - Phase I The City and Caltrans have agreed that immediate action is required to relieve congestion at the Winchester Road southbound off-ramp. Caltrans has even agreed to contribute $750,000 to the construction of an auxiliary lane and widen the bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek. A southbound off-ramp to French Valley Parkway will be included in the construction of the improvements at the Winchester southbound off-ramp provided that all the environmental clearances can be obtained in time. The 30% design package for phase 1 has been ready since mid. January. Caltrans refuse to accept the package pending the out come of the GAD. Utility plan for this location is prepared and conflicts are being analyzed. Consultant is working on the environmental issues. 7 co u. o ~ w ~ D.. ..... w W J: o o o w 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: ~ >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w. .....0 u...... 00 >-w !::o 00:: a. o ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ ~ ii: C3 CD o o ~ ~ ~ o ~ E ~E: -fi v.i cE ~ c "- 0 cO E 00 "'~ ~ B ~ c c 00 ~1l 00 c o.~ ~.g 0", .9 "6 ~9lcti '2 r:::: E ~ 0 ~ a.w~ 0.0" "0 >- 0 [ijID~ l5lB u w:= 2 ~ ~ ~ J-</llF l1SE'C -a> 20) -.- c ES ~ 8~:g .~ ~ g> u13~ ~"O 0 .~ ffi ~ o.",~ :E~e 1-:'-' a. '" ... ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 "0 'S: .~ 00 In 0 u :;; '" >- 00 o 0" 0'" 2~;' ~(O'<t ..r::::~"": f-..... ~~::g .~ E~ E c.. E 0 ~ 0;;;;; W OU"O .!!!.5 0 ~ 5 ~ ~.gj Q) 0 r:::: L.. EOroG) ~~G~ c.Euw 5:W Q) 3: ~ ~e~ :g ~ 8:-g 01-<(00 ~ ...: fIl"iij ~.s ",:5(1) w Eg:65,i...:.o ~Eo..r::::.E= t)C'l~3:~! =......~ ts:E co i3.s ~ '5- ~ e 5 (0 :J 5. ~ ~ a.~-g Q) fIl 0 r::::~ro:5~"C o :::::I 1Il Q) .~ ~ -gEm~~"C WQ)Oa.a.ro ::I..a~EO"O u_ 80; ~ .e~Q) >0 .~.....~u~~ ~;'EffiQ)ar g 1: ~.~:5-=-.-o >mrn=..r::::Ew .::E (.):c.~ Q) ~ ~.5QiE~j,:g ~.$ g-, - (/) E ..r::::~ ID ~ '* ~d.l l:Ea;.9a.:g~ 00 80 t) E Q)'- ::iE ~88>5 .~Q)g TIO 2~ro~~2~ ro.- O:::.c ell ~ r:::: U5:..r::::_lIlQlO cCOl=E.50 ,2,2 ffi 3: 2 g' CD ~ 19.Q. ~:;; Q):5 a.cn.... Q) Q) Q) r:::: E~&;:5~~ 8.....Q)3~(lJ:s: 'Oa-:5 <Il Q) CU ~:J~@E.Q~ c2oro@"-=j9 O.:!=4;<Il.g:gCl) () <( .a <( ro co.c: ... o o ~ ... '" "' iD ~ ... ~ '" S "' '" ~ "0 ~ :E .~ m 0 u :;; '" .S 10 ~ E ." c ~ o o -'" (3 1;; "0 ~ 15. 1l 00 J!l c ~ E ~ > ~ 0. .~ >- ~ "0 00 o '" ID 10 0. E 8 ." 0", .~e ~~ 0.:0:: ~.. ~ c f- 0 w ~ c ~ c o f! ::gg ~:a 1il 2 ",J;; .!:: g ijo :2 Q) $" "Of! ~ .~ ",,,, Qi;..:R (;j~1O ~~r-: u_o r:::: c co. ~80 Q) . Ql z,:U -g ~.Q:5 ~:5 ..r:::: 0....- =m - (1)-525 =:5': J?'O q;.~ ..5"5~ 3: c-g C(/)"O~g>g>:J.g-fi~e E ~ ~ l:!:?'5.u E'fO:CS Co o ctl..cuB:s-5 > 3: E ~ u ~ c: (I).c c: ro C .io';;) .G l!:! U) ctI U -'~ ('t) 0.- t'll 00 0) ID..;' t: 00 C\I._ U..t: .!!:!:t:::"ti ~ 12 ~ ~o ~ 0) 8 O)Bt'llE"'Oot'llO)~-5t: -5 00.0 a.ffi~1:! >-~ >-(\] EO)=.:; ~....._'E 'cE -gjgO"g>80o~:s:0 e - - 0)._ 00 00 t: t'll 0) 't: '+-= g ~ ci).g-"'O"'O O"'C.S; 0) -g.- OO.SihQ).g~u ~ a. OJ"'C t'll_ l,:= 0).0 f!!..... 00 ffi ffi.o~~:2=a.'m"E~1s ..t: ~OO-OJ.f!l .08t:u g~~-g.s OJlfl a......~ f!! ;:,;:,~ 5~.sg g>J2tic ~ -g rn 6, a.:m 't5 .Qi ih 00 8 t'll ......0 >-"'0 00 .0 0).- 0) ~~1iiCllt:oo~~:::l::>.a. O..t: Q.CIlO)oo:ift'llB :s:t::~ci)t::-g~:s:""':::2oo . '0.2 ~.s Sg ~S-EB-g1? 00 ~.ffi ~= ~ o...w -fl.s.!!:! '8 E O)ih= t'll_ lij-t: t'll,g 0) E ~ ~ 0) ~~ 5 _ ; ~ Q) -s~ 00 OJCIlE:s:..:::.:EoSoo.OJ;:' .s.t: 0":::': mih g>'3U E.s.Q .s~OO~1i!.c12:;:::: lfl 0) o~ a; t'll _..:::.::> ~ t:.......t: u 0 ..... Effioo<38.!!:!.t:l-u:S:a. ~ ;:, ~.;:: t: c.. ~ . t'll"'O E 0) O"iii'c~.w"'C (\] ~J:; 0) 0 -S~li=~ ~"'Cffi~~C:8'"'E-t --s~g>suroC) .....:0 O.t: 0) ::::J.o ~ O).t: c:"'O 0) 0) ~g>hu (\] a.-5ic~ ~ a.~ (\]0C:2't:E.-ooxOOt'll :::2-S8ih~8tEE:S:Q)~E ... o o ~ ... '" '" o o o 00.. ",0 ",' -'" <'>''' ".0> .": c:go 0- ~ .- ~ (:A- S 5 f!.! CI):;::::O) ",U"O ~ ;:, ..... u::tiQ ~ c ~ uO'" c:U ffi ~1;fG .t:~"'O "'00 ~ ffi >- > .g- g? [ 000. "'f-< '#.tii ~~ iD '#.0 "''<f "'80 ~ 00 N .. .. <J) c o .., ~ .. ~ .. <J) c o .., o o ~ -0 ~:g ". - , 0 ~ a.'" ..... :::l T"""~ "0'" "-~~ ","'''' "t:c"t: 8..~ ~ oo~c =O(ij m:::2m "E"""')W .- a::: 0 "' .. . C L: ImB ctI.:!::! u .0 :::l f!! .1: 00_ _ c c &88 ~ '" ~ .... '" '" 0 '"I 0 '" ,:, 0 .... '"I 0 0 :;: '" ~ ~ 0 0 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ "0 I!? 'S <T I!? ~ E c o c ~g~ ~ a. -. 0) "'C E r: ::::J t: 0) 8~.s t'll-5 '<tC':"'O .e~8~ffi "'OS,:ug> ~ ~ 0 ::1._ .go.E5"'C~;g 0) .f!.!:::l -58~.9:!~ OOO)<(-2.t: -~ ~'t5 .;::;::: g>~"'C g. ~ :O"'O~~~, Q)ffiO)~; :S:"'O -S g>5 -g~1ii:ag (\].I9 OJ E ~~.S.21? 1:5.- > 0.- ~g>~o;5 O).Qi o.s ID c:.c"""Eoo m.~ -g ~.~ 'cC)'3C)C) 'iU~~.s,g ooU.t:"'O- ~-8~-5g 00 rn 3:.S B :S:o' .- Q) g 0 CI) ]Eoo]l.s;E 00 1?~.s ~= f!! I- ~ ~5 ~ -B~ ~ .s.::.m ~r::::(ij;gBm 0"- a.~Ea. O):;;r 0) 0"'0 j5~j5~"*ffi "iij '" ~ 10 0. E 8 E jg c 8 ~ E C ~ "0 ~ C o 0. J;; o 0. ." ~ c lll.. 0."0 8;m M1? 0- ~= '_00 ~ c "- 0 ,. Q o ~ ... '" .. '#.iii" g~ -:!:. '#.(Q tn~ "'~ 5 .. .. <J) c o .., ~ .. .. :( u :;; iii 't ~ f- u :mg ~ /"-. >-~ oo~ ,,"'- 00'" ,,-,? '" >- "t: ~ 0> 0." 000 =e me "E>- ffiCO :i~ .~ f!! Ec .. 0 "-0 ..; .!: c", Ero ~li g? t'-~ ~~ 0;;; "'W f!! g 3 :3~~ (\]0<( :;-0-0 ~.m .m E c c ~ 0 0 f-OO ~ u ~'5 "f-< ~ '" '" ~ o .. ~ .. "0 ~ "S .~ "'C '" ~ ~.~~ ~ > '" '" -fl ~.~.~ f!!<cit)g cOBO) 8...t 0) a. O)"7oE .t:;;'t8 ~ >-~ 1:5 O).c._ 0) '30)t.t.0' "'C c: c:..... 1?.go~ ~ ~ .s g> ....._ f!! 0 &~ 15 rn c>0)c:g> 5 m lfl .S; rn.coO O)_"'C E t: 0 ~ 00 .~ "t3e~ E E ~ 0 I!? ~ "" ~ CIl.!!:!"7 c: ooa.~.a. .!!:!....: 0 B 3 0) ~oo n=5-e"g (\)C).aj 5 ~ &g--, n -e o.s . 2i3-f!!~ ~'iU~'t5,,!. 88~g~ 1?.!!:!-fi~"'" l-a.oou.E ... o '" '#.~ ..... "'0 :2 c Cl g:E ~~ x ~ ." 00 u.. ~ c 00 c j!! c 'm ::iE~ -~ ~ '" - .. ~it 0, "'- C"O o ~ e~ ~j!! 0. I!! 00 "e- .!!:! 0 u..O ;;""0 C3 ffi ..; .!: l'! ~ .s '" c o o E ii: E j!! '" ~ $0 '" -fl~ ~o cr.D 0'" o~ H '" 9 ~ ~ .. '" o "" :;;: o en "- ;s: CD o o ~ "'~ ~ o co u. o w ~ D.. ..... w W J: C/) C/) C/) W 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o 3: >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....C/) u...... 00 ~~ O~ a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ ~ a. oC( o - ~e o~ ~o :;. "<D g~ _0 ~ ~ 'S; " o .= ~ C <P 5 Q) ~ n ~ ~ t'l) .E "E ~ g. :g 0 a:: 8 ~ " c ffi~.2o~ c:o..ooo 0~.;2 ._ u....... ~ ts ~5t>C<le .m i:'o ~ c .58~~8 ~::.g+.:~ "02esi; ....c-o.... ~"(ij :5 E 2:: "0:::0<(<( -ga* <("E::g >- co (lJ Q) Q) Cl~-;~ ~m~-o ell:;: C1.g} eO:5:5 a.. ~ :B EO ~C "8:;;0 e C (IJ (958-= m:n2~ 3:.5 t) e . lD~C:8cg> "C 0 0.- ~()~o~ ..c .Cl.a;; Cl 3:l.O<P!;2"'C ~~~~1ij ~~tO~e ~~ ~ 5 c a.C<l ~ c: 8 <C.......-mo . EI'} 0 e>>!!:: ~~5.8~ ~cC)5"': ;::a:sng a E Q) :::I C C ct:I Q).::: 8 o"CErn "C:C'13 c8 a ~ t'll C "00 2i; a ~ e o'3EOI-~ ~~~<<:io ~coeg> ... Q) (J,) It) -- ~n:5:!::t Q'i~(Q~~ ,. . o ,.<D ~~ -- Cl Cl ~ ID ~ ~ ~ ..J o o cO '" o .; '" '" = ro c c ~ '" u :;; Cli o "'" m ~ ~ Cl" c: "1jj :a L.. ~ ~ -g-g .- ~ 0", ~ ai E .. ~ ~ e13 o.ro .~ K ~g. ~ ~ c ro n 0> 6 =?j ~ '\: -- ~~~ B=S8 J2 C) c: 0.00 ee-g -gu"O ell CD Co ~:g~ o Cl 0 E", ro e c 3: -roll ~-e!!! :>.oi3~ ~ '~:.iO o::;(ij . a.3:~ :E ~.~ I- '(i) -0 Cl C . "2 <D c !2-61 "'~ ",.e O';c 00 eU ~E c 0 ro c 0.8 E.c 8:!::: ~~ .ero 0:;; 2>> ~m as ll", ~"* c'" 8,2! c u 00 ti .~ 2'" _ c :g~ 8 ill ",E ~ c "E .2 roll ~.E o "(3 C 'i 8 o ~ oa.:g ",~E o~ .~ ,. = - "' ffl,o 00; o ~ ro 'S; " o .= ~ '" '" N ro is <D <D 0 o J,rn i?i >. 0 c: or:: >'C o ~ LL ~ C\I E lb'S (;:8 -ffig> g>~?i3g.~ a:-ggO::~:5 .c Z o_.$! Co,...: Jg-;'Veo...lO Q) .00 (.) .N o:::O:::tq,CCf.latf _i..:~8i..:~ coo III t5.o.; III 1:$.;..; Ees:2es ~cobco rooE._oE a...0<(004: <ci o ~o .......~ ia';g .... :2: rJ lB" .S .2:! Qj ~E~ .0,,_ o-~ - ",.c ",co ~.Qo ~~;, ~;~ ~~a. .~ ga;- B e a n.9~ .5.~~ ~~~ 8 ~:ij .80 <00E e:&,g :;;r~~ 51?& ",~N ~EB ffi:;: I: ~.~ ~ w -c /1) ~~~ 'O.~ .M .!R:=: .... 2 ~.ii) a..W.p ... o "' ~~ e. E ~ " u " ID ~ o ~~ :s:g E_ <.9.; .c'" ~o oE; ~ci 2~ c c 13J:l cOO .2 iD ~g> .fi~ UJ ;..: l2~ G E ~c ~ 0 1-0 ... o _. <D .- 0 oe ~ ;2"C ro~ Q~ o c ro 'a ~ :;; E ~ o 000 mID 1'-1- 2 i5~ '" ~J:l - c &38 _ c o 0 .~13 oc ~ " 0 Eo "~ ~ -50 .~ /1) .cE '50 0- 00'" 0) .~ I'- 0 '" 2 0 ~ .- &g c~ o c o "jlO '05 2 .- 1;;1l cS 8 ~ ~ 0 .eo == /1) ~E 0_ ~.e 'O"E ~ ro !;~ u . .~~ - E 0.= "~ ca ::~ ~ ~ '" E c ~ ::JI- c .. ",0 ~ ~-g~ NOLriM"E~ ~~e~~~ >--g~Mca"'C I:!EN 5.2;l x $"'C..... ~ _ 2 ~~5l2~~ .2;l =c ~ E'O ca ca2"'C"'C~"'" .E ~ ffi:! c ~ 0'-~'-8 :E.~(\)B 5 8Q)m:3u:iQ)~ Q):;:CI)eo"5 ~::'Oo~a."c g~g~:;;r~ro & ~ 1:8~ ~.~~ I::S ~"'CuE 0Q)1:Ct)Q)ij:.... Q) E .!:!l I: ffi ca .g I: /1) ID 0 w.b Q) ~a."o!'3:2Q)0' J::BQ)ca.o.pQ) g>~j5a.:Q-g~ 2 I: ".:.::.o.....s: = ca"'C g 0/1);;' ::;::>-Q)........-e..::.:: ;0 ~~ w S 0 i5 "'C:;:lQ):20~:;: ca.~~~co.~ ;;Q)..c;g~/1)~ 'OQ)-o J:: caJ::=ww]-cn -.:: :;: 0 ~ ..:.:: =0~""0.9:;: :;:1: CWEN '0.0 S ~ t> ";' ..c:: .!Po. 1:: ro ca w t> 0 ~ E &.5.~ ~c>>:; ~<( E ~ a.U5.~ c..:CLri:gS/1)/1)E <c ]-..... ca <c .p .p :;:l '" ~ '" ~ co. ro x ~ ~ > ~ 5(\) -g~ ro.e "C c ~ 0 >:;:l o u ~ 2 .c1;; - c -0 ~ t> cO ~~a5 (1)Q)e -g!9~ ~ 0 c ~SO t)..5~ miD-e ~ ~ ~ - 0 ro ~ ~-g (/):g ca c.e <0 Sue B~~ ,Qo::::;;r ",roO "~"E 5 gg"'C .s!ro~ "'o~ ~ ~ g- o u ~ g.c.c 0:&.9 c '" ~ c 0 .13 E miS<c LLllll /1) ~ ~ "'- ~ '" c c -c 0 0 moo ,. . o ,. = ~ Il " ID ~ n g c - Q)~ui"1l) ~~2"'""": >..c a...M 2:::i Q) ~ a. '0 '0 ~ EQ)~r-- :o~C)~ ca eiS;;; & 0.'0';"; ~ ~~ 5 :::::I 0 C 0 ~~8~ ... o ... o .. '" <0 0 "- :;;: 0 .. <D '" ... (/) '" .... .... '" D.. - 'i' 0 0 'i' ';' 0 Q ;;: N Q ,;, ,;, <D '"' ,;, .;. 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ s: ~ ~ s: .. 11. 11. .. ... o *8 15" _ 0 ~ ~ ro J: '5 u '" ~ ..J ~t! ~ ~ 0 !;,I- ~ :;; o c o '" i3 '" 'a o :;; c ro 'a ~ :;; " '" o '" ro 'E g m o o .c u c &. co u. o CD o o ~ "'~ ~ o w ~ D.. ..... w W J: C/) C/) C/) w 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o 3: >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....C/) u...... 00 ~~ O~ a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w E; 0:: a. ::a: ~ ii: <( o u) Q) ~ Q) .>> ro ~~ OJ ~~ .s~~:g ~ '2 ~ .~ m .5 c: ~ ~ - ~:5 ~ o C:.- 1:) Q) Co 0 ro..... Ol -g::.::::dl::::J"g 1U.J::()rnw"0":::': o"iij ~O(f)'O.....a._ o~c: -- co <( "0 CI) X = Q) 0.:5"1: <u 0 Q) ~e!a: ~-~.~ g~ !~:=~ ~ Q)OO o2'-Z-0 ~0.:5.!:!?:.- o-ac..a.lQ~l5 -gQ)(/)5-! .S!l Q)I 0.5:0 ....:: <<I ":;: a.. 0 ~ -UL1.-cm Q)~~-@-ororn Q)OlcmCl>..cl-eO C:Q)- '0'.5 ro.c 5!-- W'!:::ro..c~ a.~6.s"E .ci~=~O~- Q)>a=rnrot)T"""roai::w~1J) :5g~"E~'~'C~E.e~~j ..... l/J ~~::I: e~l,:: ::J<(_-g a. ~.~ 3:l :::I:;{ c...... L.. g 3: (/) 115 c <('0"0 ()CI)~ o.eOI_g? 0.2> a....ac:o--..:::.:,...-u.oCi~ W(I)Q)'OQ)l5:B"-So5. "0 6B~~E- 3=~ffi; g.-g~ c'c"'O ai-gCl ID<( E 01<( roo Q)..cg?E<<l~:5-5]1s:~o E~oc:--=,C)o.!::oJ:~ ::J.........2::2<(c..:::.:>ctl >. 0-00..__0-;:: Q) r:::: o.L1. e ~T""" o e g->(/)UJ::J Q)ww li5 o.3;N CJ __ :ijwo -03= 0)0.:5,;:: "C -c: = ~ 5-~ C)Z1i] ~~:5~<(:O co c. ce..cC$cl!!-tn .00..<( ~Eff"~ro~'iij.~~-g~:g ~o c3=c=::J.J::t)L..emmQ.c,,::,::: e c~.eO'; E~ 8:0 S: Q)~ al '>o._Q).!::Q)olJ)mw~..cos: C"(ij ~:5<(ii=~ C_<P o;~ Q) ~-fi::: CIl~~S~ 8=;;;.f9 0):5 t;.," x ell 1:) T""" c: C m c: .- I/) c: 0) ~wo~=Q)Q)ogE.?:-c:..Qc --- 0 x Ci.o E Q.S!l.og Q) roo;:: .~~dQ)<(eE::::~ii::ro:5lJ)~ Qi "C f/l ~_ ~ S -- <( - E C ~ ....oc._o._ E ='xm:ez.. a.. Clf!!O.:.:::O 0.015 3: 0 0 Q)U Q)!!~Q)Q)Q)c::Io>.a.z..a. ~88.= ~~'E ~.3~ la-u K~ E .g _ x ~ 0 ~ u. rn " .c C '75& ~ ~~13 ~ Q)::I-o 0 ~~~ oa ~:2~ .~ 0.'50 . ~ EoO:::~::z:: ~~ ~&i ~ffi~ g~ 8:.-0 m.. m!~~~ ~.;:: On.~ moo"EUs::l i3~~~~ Q)co"UEo a.. a.. w::Jo ... .. .. ... .. .. "2 ~ ,!:! C( .s ~ ; "&l~ ~- '"l- il: ~ ~.: ..e;,. ~cfi~ .~~~5 ;58R<( ~z.Qi~g~'._~_ .... S Q) M Q)..... a. ... co S .c_.... 05j0=c5S>o. cotj::.;::o ....Q)3:en a. Ql 0 0 a...... 15:J a>..... ~ ;;t.2 0u..en<(2 >O"UCIt::O'- lSo.~'55j >~Q)EQ):cE ~"''''S':':::E oam~::I-5Q)Q) EE..~~ ::soa-:C'5-5a.. :> _ ;> '.. LL. ll)';:: 0 ~ E ;> C a. ~Q a. E 5 ~iL 8551~~ =<<><(~u"UQ) E~'~~z.. ~c.5""'::I~-c e.50'20 0~0.::..-1- ...."EQ)::I.... ~~E....~Sl() Q) 0..c"U Q) s,-.g"'8 S'~~ >ol-(/)-5....E(/).... E-.:t ;5O-oco o.cQ)mQ) C 'Q)Q)O ....~..=a.-5otjo -g1'sE;; EO~~~~~ m....o-Effi 80oac.ec ~0~8o.. Q)cfism~~.9 o~';.e g, -58 5j~c:::-13 ""'E.:.: .- &:\\..- E c.Q lS & 0::1 :E.~ 13.;:t:i E ~ g Co ~ 5:2: C c"'O =..-s.-....o. .- 'a,CO~::IQ) ot:iQ)w ~ Q) c a.b .c..c.:.::: ~ c..... lS ~i;~~1'- 2;lrl~8~.~ Q)~o ~ =:m-5.~=tijg.51 ~ -0 e-~:: 3:'E c 0 3: (/) """ ......;::0;0 c.ocoent::m":::: en~o::l13 g::lo..~!9co. Q)..c~~.c. g(/):5ro(/)O~-g -g~ 1::..... S (/)~-.:t 0)0 Q)._~ 03:<(13 '~~Q).!!;::~E .5 -0 en en -g r.= . -5 m Q) ro o..g ~ ~::J~ 5l ~~ ~~:g~13 en '0'0::: 0.= 00'00'00 Q)= -0 5j ....NQ)C.3: oCl)(/)(/)..ccoQ)Q) a..~-5.Ql:t:::; o~~ ~ lS ~ 3:~.c ~O-g:gg ()).;:::ge~J:!Q5m l-13al"U(/) <(Oma.ml-(/)-c ... c .. ~~ Co> "'c ~ :i!" CbO:S .!! 'j CO ~'" U)~e to C o '0; C -Ii w ~ > 'C " " c rn "C ~ > o 6" " ~ ~ "E .l9 ~ "3 '" ~ :g c m 8 ~ c ~~.~ ()o~ rn '" " (j)NU 'E ~.!!!. ~ ~ 0 :2:.90: S- .- 0 rnrn ~ ~ ~" ~.:.:::o () ~ c ~- ~.... R o 0 ~ $~::I ,ou c;;. S 0':::: .- ~~-5 !9 >. 4:: rn~ e =" ._ m I- u.>rn '" '"I c c ~ ~ Z ?f!.'" U')~ ..c j '" e ~C); '" l! e ,:, ",~IIl rn 0 lEI- - o :;: '0 :;; c 8 w rn @ ~ :l c ~ ~ ~ ~-g.9 ~~ 0>"'0 Q)I- -ocoeroQ) c3: c (j) 0..5 E Q).Q"U u) co';:: a.u.. ::I......~ c c w:J~ . (j)~ a> al.Q 0:2:5~$.5~~.~ <(Q).oooc"U.e~Q) CI):5::1C\lQ)~ll)",,"" ~.cot6E.-oQ)o ';;~x"""ElSo.o:: ....3:w=oQ)NEc $croi5..0;;oilSS c.2l.Q<(-o CO""" Q)"S iii 'a,13oc~3:T..10~c c"UC)o _....Q)o~ w=S(/)-gJgO.....O..... '5~alc3:.-cl!!Q)ro (/).....0~Q)Eo.5..c0 a.Q)o~.s;:.c:c .....E 0:5~8~~~~13o OSEE~xo.~.:.:::./:: >,coE Q)Q).....lSalc E.5~.g3:C~~.c~ <("E C)"U (/)~ E ~c IS CI) 8d:'~~~.a Q) ~.g ::J lS a.. c ~ 3: ..c rn"'13~!ll~gQ)~~"5 c-c....o_.... Q)co f!!g.Qlmg~~gEc ~C(/)3:Q)cen~Eg mow .r.S.....It::OO 00..cZ'+:l c'-02 :5"UI-5j-g a, wE lrl .t) '3: g t5 E co'oo E c%1ij c C)i:i: Q) a ~~ 8"'0 t) 8 .5z..'O'o~ C"U ~ca.-ocJ:!-oCOE'Q) 0::1 -w.....ceno> 3: 0 c!9 -0 R co C '(5 (/)ow5j~E....l!!~~ .- Q) E II) 0 wa.. .... ~"U Q) E'-:ii=.c-o~ (/) ,-,oo>cc>.Ew:>co 0.... e e.2l.!!jg.~ ij)..c Q)wa.'S;:(/)Eo.>.-z.. ~~E5j~2~~~0 .~ 0 1-5 5lrn"' oS e-.~ ~ " "- ill ~ "3<( :>;" ~ c ~ rn e c 000 g:ii=co .~ ~~ ~ECt) :22~ "'- in .. ";fl.'" U')~ "c "'~ "'J!! E<( III ~ E" " E j<( <- ::;: = ~ .. <D o r-- :;: o en a. ;:;: co u. o '<t W ~ ..... w W J: tI) tI) tI) W 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o 3: >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....C/) u...... 00 ~~ O~ a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ <( ..... ~ o CD o o ~ ~ ~ o .. ~ N o ~ .. .. ~~~ "0 ~ B !1 "'ffi~ca e -5 0.0 0- .. 0. -gc.l!iroctl ro ~ r:::: ~ w> CI).:!::: Q) -rnE-g~ .~ 0 Ern.Ul .9W80.>- ~~~:Q2 I.O"'~~~ _~.c ~~o~-g -gcnffi>ca 5ca.Q)~ .oe"ffirnc =5~~ ~.~ g 5 ~~::J .e~'m~~ w....2?-o c::::J"O.gN .mli:-g~o ~.9c~~ -a::J:9(1);:E .1:::0:;.1:::::' .0)0:: :g ~.~ ~ -g 8.1:: <( w ::::J cD 'O.s "C O..c to en "> ~~ E"ffi . o Q)"""'_ _ VI ~::'3: 2! ~E =E-ci"ctI..cc 30~N~=~ ti':= = ::::J 0 0 .~m~m~:E ....ci.j::<:::::crn a...!!! O)~l:!!';:: .~ c:.!::..!!! m'w ~.a~~o:5 '" N .. "'''' :he ..!!). ~ ...... .~ ~ c:li! '" o '" .0 .. ;;; ~ rn '" "c ~ I """ 30! r:::: .....~ro ~-E .~ 5 ~ E~Q) ~l.l')1Il 8:i:~ o.9~ .c_~ u ~ .. c ~ c ro.bO "'CI)U (I) @ Q) to _ ~"5:5 g ~~....gmO) -c,Ec;::::Jc ~g>~(ij~1il'E l!?"5 o.:g = '68 5.l!?-rg.'~.9€ .9 a$ s..g>~.E g'E'~~:g co.!Q "53: C:"oo ::::l ~ r:: .S -0 ~ Q)::: C').~ "E-mo~~g'u 8T5~~.QW~ .!Q Sl a :Ql=6 S: <( wrdOi5alWu s:m~'ffiiiE~ CI) ~ E J:: ~ 3: c -;;~o;'5~8 .~'~.:::~g~(ij Q) 0 Q)"S;: .... II) r:::: ~~~~~(\]'5 .- r:::: rn 0 0 3:'c g'~ g-J2l$ g>2 UJOlJ)ro_~o C)8o(/J~Q)Q) r:::: Q) ca 0 Q) a. o-o.~..c._ E 8 ~ffiew:s<(U) r::::tD~3:CI)-g ..9 Or::::'" (f) .SErd...~g*..... ~Ec~~:iaa.li5 cQ)Q)'.,.,.->EE ga.eK'Oeg-o -sJ98-.:c~-o~ :g~.mlB.!2>~ffiE 8Eg.E~-(Ilro .... Q)'- .... c: 0 5>gQ)i:)o~.Q~ 'w.5.g>a..~8.~'C ~ai:g.~a..ge8 "#. o '" ~~ o~ ..~ " ~ a! .. ~ "'~ l5~ ..., '" ;:: r-.: ;;; '" ., II) CD e _s U i;; J!l ~ ~ c .E .5 ~ c :2 w CD g> > 0 o ;:: ~ c '" 0 :2_E m'Coo (j)~'C ellJ~ Ci5 ea:J cl5.~ .as ~ 0 :2 _U '" o .:, o ~ .: j!j ~ c E ~ ~ U"'rn c~>. O.c E 16 u w C g> c..!!! =: 00..- -ernE -c.o .~ ti: ~ LL", .l/J.S m ~:Z1O o ~.g- ~:g+.l ;;::roffi o .~ '0 m'C ffi ro~ .$ -a~ai -0 c E c8 8 E ~ 8 m ~ u ~ ~ -5 ~ @- ~'E1j iil -s -c c.o.c 8~2~ .~ m"g ~ u"groea .~o.$ :E e.s ai '0 o.,.e E.:.::: ~~ElD f- 3 8 ~ ~:g "'i'; "0 ~ ." ro LL ~ C rn c j!j c 'ffi :2N -~ ~ w 'C~ ~'7 ..- .~ ~ ~>- ~~ 00 :>>e- .~ 0 LLU -"'-0 offi "#. '" .. ~ " '5 "' '" II? '" o o .,; '" '" <'i '" .... ., o o W ~ "" '" -0 l!! "' 11 rn .c u 0: '-' c J!l " W c 8 ~ ~ 'T ~ !i .. 'Oil) '0 o ro e- II) O..c o,.e U:O 0- ~.g?" >>.€ 5-e.... E 3: o a.,E<( 1lJ () .~ II) '0 C II);;.~ C ro :s! ..:~ ea E ~SS2.e > C II) 'C C .- Q) :J 0 8 O:::O.Qo E C Cii -e.S o.Q>o.~ .:= ~ .9 .Q >> S:J-eL1..~ ea-e II) Q);:. -ews:s!-g~ g>-ee~oll) 'Bmc~""e cOIl).- -e 0 II) 0.11)0::: ms a.e..c.9 0 II) ~a.~-eg..E oll)roCa:J ..c-5..croll):E c'O:g t$ -5.S 9C~ij;:--5 .0Q.cea-- ~u .8-53: ~ 2 ai II) C.S .Qt).E::O~~ iii C '0 .w ~ ..c a.8CD:g!gg II) II) a. a. 1I):;::l ro-5.Q'O>ai 3:-5~c5(j) 0.-11)0-'0 .g?,,5'O~~'O o....;lI)ull)lI) aeE~~:g .~c8c.5a. ..c 0 II) II) c e 1-0..c:s!Wa. o ~ ;; r-.: '" ~., ~ . ~ g CI) ill 2:'< CD"g B rn .9 ~ cI o !- -~ ~ ~ E jp2 ... c 1lJ!l "'" N ~ .f!:! 0 OU -0 wj!j 'B~II) 2 - ~ e.~ 08.. s .s 8 ffi g> 0 (f) .0) a. ",.0 3 g e_~ rn ea iii w W ~ ffi~rn ti:g]5 ~ '" E -0 C c 8- 1il J~ -g'~ E: rn '" ~ II)cII)....; ~~-5ro g.rog>E ~ ?f'S.E 5S,g~ ~rnc =o8ffi g -ri.~ l5. roro_;:R _oco go:::~o ....ro:J..... ~~~~ 8 e>8-;;; =~c~ 3: .... .2>.S: ~~me .0' c '0 it: ....:JII)s o.~-5 II) ~e.9~ I-O.S 0 '" :n ... "#. .. ~cD ~e ",'" e. I! ~ ~ U ~ "' 3: i;; ... c ::J -0 ro ~ ~ C)~ Cii c co 21 -eN ea $...... :2 c" , "'~ E tTI~ s zc ~ ::s is en .;..;E ~ c <( ~g>~o ~.~ ~ g 3 egg ::Eooo o ";' o o ~ CI) '" ::J c J!l " .. c 8 c '" "in ~ -0 ~ E E .~ '" o o N <5 N ~ ~ .<? ... ~ " -0 ~ .c u .. .~ '" .S Q; 1M c o ~~ '" 0 ~~ <u '" Q .. '" o o .. '" "'0 ON ~ ~ ~ ~ "' ~ ~ rn J: 'll u CI) 3: '" -0 ~ Iii c ~ E c OJ c CD ~:8 ~ 0> 5~"-: -e 0 Il) II) -E e-co .g> 00 N __ oO~m :z 1Q ~ :z !l:J 0 ~ >. .. E >- m1:<(lIl E ~ 0 E II) :J ~ II) m~'Cm ;::88;:: ~ s ~ ";' .. o ~ .. ~ '" o ~ .. CD II) II) ~:5; II) 0 '0 ~.~ .g>::g-trn -c 1I):;::l >- g ..c~u1-a. ~Ci5~~K 1::-1::- ro.Q.8m'O 'O~.?;o8..~ II)'OCDeiii u ..c a. .... ffi.~ ~ ro <( Cii~l/J'Oc ~~~3:~ rn II) -;.~ ~ 1:l::ea~~ II) ea II) .- E-gi::-g~ grom~8 -5~.~E.e ai "; l/J 8.$ -ggj;Sl/Jai ro'O-o~E ~ l/J $.~ E -~_~2~8 'OEt)o~il Q) .... C -e ..c.$ 8 -e.s: -; II) II).E e ~~g8~:E g ~o:z I:: ~ .s II) ~ ~~ Q) o~:J.a-~]! 11)0 0 LLI .2'S.sE~-g a. II) (1).$ Ernts II).E 3: II) II) 8- ~~~~1:~ ~~ oz '" ~ II? U J!l ~ 'C '5 :2 ~ ;; j!j I! ro 0. ~ .. .!l '" c :ii o 51 ~ ro", ~G; s: .. i~ rn '" ....0 ,,~ 5:2 ;a~ rn c "Iii ro ;; ... 0 :i? I:: II? 0 (1)1:: .0 8. .j ~ rn W u ~ .0 E iis ~ .. ~~ ~ z ~ z *-11'> 00 0", ~ 0 ~ ro 'S: ... o .5 ~ ~ ~ rn J: 'll u '" rn '" l!! o :2 c ~ c :> .9g cO ~<5 Eo c'" .21U')- m~ "'8 ..." ~2 '" rn N .s .f!:!iil ow ~ ~ o -h o ~ .- M .;. ~ .. <0 o .... ~ CI) a. s: co u. o CD o o ~ It)~ ~ Wo Cl <C D.. ..... w W J: C/) C/) C/) w 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o 3: >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....C/) u...... 00 >-w t::O 00:: a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ ~ ~ o ... g ... '" ... .. ... .. .. '" .. ~ ~ ... 0 ... <> <> <> <> ~ ~ <> <> z '" <> N <> OJ .. <> '" <> .. - - - M ~ M :;; M M ... ... .;; .;; - ~ ~ e " ~ ~ ." C ." C U C 0 '" 0 ~~ " .5 I- .5 '" M 0 ::; ~I- ~ ~ M ~ M iii ::; ::; ~ '" w 0 ~ ." 'C E '" ~ &. '" Ii t- ~ ~ ~ w (!) Cii .c ." w g Q; " ~ c c '" :t '" c <0 '" M 0 :;; .c 0 -< c () ')l <i' 'in '" > m 0 -lO '" -- C M .0 m ~ ~ M 0 :2 0 ~ '" "- 0 J1:E c ." ." ,'!! N .Q Cii .~ >- ~ ~ C ." m 0 "- S ~ 0.." tl cO '" ~ "'c "'c ~ Ii ~ 0 cO "e' ffirno ",,,- (!)~m c g IE "'c "- 01- g, w '" 0 [).;..l ~ :> c ~ -- m c '" "'2 " cs~ '" 0 E '" 0 .c w'" "0= i\1-sg - w ~ '" u ~ ~ '" ~ w c C .,,~ :So ~ ~ ~ .3 '" ~ - ~ ~ 0 0 '" "-0 "''''' Cii woo = = '" 0 ,... ~ 0 OJ ... '" UJ - - - on D- <> '9 '9 - - 0 ~ :s: ... ... '" ,;, ,;, <b ... ~ <> ~ ~ <> <> <> ~ ;;: ~ ~ 0. 0. .. c e "- '5 ." C ~ .c "5 o w", ~ ~ ~;g m~ E ,;, ~ '" :a ~ e- 0.0 ~"' "''''' ro"C-o .S lUO {!! .S .l: "O"Q)l:: ~ W 0 E.l'l x <c '" :2 I- ~g E '[ l!1o. B Ul-g -g e .;:!w ~ ~ wM "- ~ "'.c c ~ ::2 0) ~ c mn : 2,; ~~ .~ 08.. .2i~~ ~ ~.!! 0..0 c E c 0 8"rJ :; ,#.oc g ~.~ e r::::.s :;S.g g'~ <C ~2f5 c ~"(i) IL f!! 'u 0 = ... ~ g-c i3 II) "U ~ .!:!! -g ~ ~ U(\](I).c Q) (I) en C 0(1 ffi ~ 0 an: ~.!!! ~ ~ z z '" c .Q ~ rn of: CD ~o-g ~ ~ ~ ~.3g ~ ~ 0. 0)'- E c::2 ~ ",."w _ c ocu"B ~ ~.~ e & aP m~m (jC{) ->-'" g c '" c ~ c Q) Q) "2 g ~"E e.o ~ "S: "C Q) 55 ~.!:2 "'C 0:: C . c.eQl,$ tllU)E~ .2>5ffi ~ lB,g 5r8 "U u 0 CI m ~:?~ > a:::._ '<t go 2.!:2 CQlE!w .- "C a... <<5 'O"1ij Q)(f) .92.,.c~a... ~~.-:.<c rJjU)t)O :2Q)<<lw 1-:5ll)c.> -EE5 m S: U) .?;>";: ~-o1ii-a ~m ~~8.9~~TI ~ e ~ ~:g J:!.?:o 0) a. C +=l-.o ctl 19 :g.9 2 $ ~_!:2 ffi .0'0 &.E~.!!! E ~~06x:g~e :OC(l)~Q)-='> ::08~.~:Q'5..c ~ro~-gt<(6 balE~Ro; ~"E~~e-gg . co ct:I - rn Q)'_ ~~~~~Q)~ 0..(1) Cll w",.!=:Eii'i a. (\]:= ".. Q) +-' Co ttlS:~;>:5~2 cQ)(IJ<P.....w/IJ 2'6Q)'6'Eg~ oz.;;z-g:;:::;'o c . 3::5 (I).{g Q) .QcnQ)'_ co. 'O:C":;: s:.9 Q) f/) .Em~~J9E~ f/) E ....;;::;; U E 0 C ca 1! :B ~ 8 ~ 80." E x Q)'- ca:::l Q).... = 5B~15~'1V'~ (I)....-.O..c..c Q)m=(I)-5Z--~ "'0 C Q):i2 - c{j..c .2~:OQ)=$3: gQ).a..c~entf :.::; ~ (j) I-..c 8.~ ~(.)"OUf::?ui"2 ........!a ~ Q) ca Q) a. 2'Oc'n-::E- 0.2cac; m-g (I) t:: > 0. ~ E"'O .- Q) '0 Q) ca.$ C ~<9~:5o..(ij~ . E 6, - Q) <: C ~5o(j)m Q)w<uQ):Ja. :5C)~85E o~'Oen-~8 ii:'~.& Q) Q).~ ::E ~~:5~:t: CD=.Q~Ej9 - ca '0 oc W f/) :::l C ca C .~ ~Oo13m-g U Q) o..9.c's ~ rn ~ to gj C" a..~~8..c:~ CQ)cNSQ) Q)5~ u:;:::::: w~~~.~~ g>0.5_~ 5~ ffi~g>~EE ::E>;mEQ) t)~~a.8.e- Q) c Q) ~ . ca CD .!!! "C g g>..c Q) 0. ~_._ 3: :5 S CD ~.2! ~ g>~(.)m~oEC:: oc Q) 0 Q) 8 .... 0 .9>3:Een.&.~_ :g~O::(ij~~ ....a..Q)cuo2: :gs:52a;-ca 'O;"'OcQ)~ :::l :::l C .- en Q) E 13 =0 ca C ~ Q) 0: -~ 0. ii:'<: ca-~~ o....::E~ECQ) Q).&ocaQ)w"'O 'e~s~E;o'~ ~E~t::~~O :c.9 ~ 8. 00 rn I-wa..w3:(.)z ca 0 -60 Q) co __.... Q) ....~'O-5 c{j ~~~mm "ffi '0 '"": ~ ~.!a z.. i;18ocQ)g'>.. E'c':::: o:g;;::;;~. Q) Q) C C 0_ Q) (.) ":~ 8 g? ~ Q) Q) Q) :::l u'- f/) E..c: oo::a::~Q)c>. {gC)roca~o.c :::lc'::>3:-<.("O en= ~C Q) Q) Q) -g~m_Q:5O:~ 2.s(l)TSgj~:6 Q) c{j ~ -c 3: I- en ..c: 0) Q) O.:!:: . m .~.~';5~~o (I) ~ ca m g.;:: co ~.cc{j:E<(~O ~:;=CDcM~ u-~~-ci~~>; C)s>-g?-c.!!!m :E~~o~~::E mQ)CI)~<(o;;i (l)C<('__OC c{j~~~<(;~ C)"O-3:c6e;!ca '2~ ~-g~ct) mE.22N8g TIg?CI)'QN'Qc f/) ca.& _ C ~ Q)o.caeno"E -gm~g-g~~ -g'Q81~~<(3: -- - <( r--. o.c:i.!a '0 ~ . r.n 0 to..c: C o~Ecrn~c:iI-Q) K~'~><~$.~-g enca:;2f/)M(QQ) :cg.E 8:::Effi:!:: g. I-....WcaCDw"<t'"O $ z ... '" OJ $ z $ z ~." W ~ ~ '" .c'" I-C u! ~~ .c_ l! 1l '" c ~ 0 E w >":2 .0.0 ." - :m.E 'E -g .0 .~ ~" W ~ ~ > w." .am ~ ~ -.0 ~= W ~ ~~ 0."(5' 5 c. u~ 2 I- . ~-ci-g 8~~ ~ '" -g's: ~ a.~Q) 80la; cr.S (I) c ~ c 3:.c .Q -81!1~ ~~~ ~ ffi ~ za.g. '" ::. co CD o u.o o~ CD~ W~ C)O <C D.. ..... w W J: C/) C/) C/) W 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o s: >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w. .....C/) u...... 00 >-w !::O 00:: a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ ~ ii: <C o B '2 .c o l'l .~ z. G 19 in" C C ~ ~ C OJ e 0 .~ ~ ~ J!l "0 C C ~ '" E 11 E 0; 8 E "0 o ~ ~ > '" 'ij ~ ~ ~ 'w 0 " ~ "0 " 0. '0 &. ~ c;~ Jj ~gu 5, g-.E '~J:1'w - (/,I e c (I) ~ctla..(I)o (I) .!Q'O E '0 "O(/,I_Ectl "o~"'8" (I) 19 t:: -- _~ (I)'E ~~ ..... .0'-:::::1 c8 :B ~ :z (/,I ._..... e "0 z.-o (/,1-0 C o~:::-gc;:' o o 0<0 ~ q~ ~ ~~ e 8;60 2 .q:o>;,: .s ~~ci (I) 10...... C ..... N.' ~C?Zigs ;;;a.. .....ctl 5~~ffi~ (l)o;;;Eo 0> c.S "03: f".. (I) (/,I c ctl ~0::5~~ (l)UUctlQ) -~ ~'2'~~~ 'a..o::~~ .~ z. G ~ C ~ OJ ~o c>- @ .0 u) ~ 3: c ,~.Q? g ~>- ~e~ _ ~ ~ 3: (I) >- C Q)"O..c@ '~:5 ~ ~ :: I -:;: U Q):::::-(I)>- -o~::..c c-(I)3: =?~-g.Q? t::3::>5; 0(1) . c;. ars -!Q Q) 0:: C ~-g S(l)ctl::::> ctl E C I oC<((/,I L.. e u'w ~.~ [~ ::;..wEc >--<: e@(ijo u)o3~!!:: .......... m._ @ ffi(l)Z> I- E'O'O'O'O ~jgH- o ._ ._ ._ Jl! ~~~~'E 'w :::::I :::::I :::::I .g (/,I (/,I (/,I (/,I (/,I ~-g-g-g'E "ONNNM m ^ ^ ^ ^ iD C ~ OJ o >- .0 J!l C ~ E E 8 "0 g! ij II! ... o '" ~~ "'<il "'0 ~ '" .;; "0 o .5 ~ s '" 'i' .... Q ~ ~ ffi ~ m (I) 5 .c .0 0"'" 0 (/,I Q) :s~~~ ~ ~g_Q?a. -; g8~~~-!i C) 5~~(ij L.. g.... 8 3: C 2-0-0 (1)<(-0 j:1(1)(I)z,-:;:oe cEE=e!!::ctl ~E.oE5L..@o. E..c:::::l .21-e E~(/,I~(/,I-oC. oec.:;:_Q?~~ U"O (I) (I) c .- u) c ~:: ~{i~ U) ro (/,I 0 E (I) U) ~ "0 ctl"" 8.c'- e~.c~ (1)10 o.m5@~u~ (/,I L.. a...... = ctl (/,I ~:g(l)8:;U.~s ~m~ gt::m 16 ffi g g "0 8..-0 U (1)......-0(1) (1)5 Q).oe:!EL..i:2 :5 (I) a.. 'E~ ~ . -5~iij.o:::::l'2'~ 5~O~:CL':;: -.20 (I) c (l)ot::e :;::> <( ..c :B -a. @ L.. g>~~..c8Cl.E .- (/,I CD (/,I "0 -d" <( 60l9jgco$' E.s...... roo.:r (/,I 3: '"7 -~ "0,& U. .- @"<t >. e..... 0 uoo(ijmc..... (1)_ c c ar.2-o .00ctlo<(L..t):! 0..63::-0.(1).- (I) 0...Q? g: ffi 2 ~ ~~~5~8~ ... o .... ~~ "'.. "0 - ~ .c '" g ,!?~ ~at ~ E ~<: "0 C '" '" C ." ~ e " ~- >"'0 0"-0 IO~M '"7 om - 0. - >.,&0; "'~o ~o": L...~0 ctl 0 .. CLL..o >- "- .c .S!! Q)'~ (ij OlZ >~~ -5-5t:: CL..~ e20 "-c:;; - ";' ... Q ~ ~ ~~~ - - 8.95 . C '" ~ ro_S ma.~ ~z.o ~:= 3: -::5 .!Q ~~~ ~ C) ~ C ~ C '~~8 -g~-o eE~ c8rn ~ C ~~ro ~ '" '" ~ C .c :5 -v ~ ",.0 ~ :5 * '" C ~ -a. ~:Y .2 ~ ~ ~ '" 8 01 t3 "0 ~ ctl c o a. ro u) ~~ ~ ~ c..... L.. (/,I .2l 0.. ~.!Q i3~ejjj -0 0 C. c '# ~ .~ ~ O.....cc M~ge ~.2 ~.:;: I- e 0 ffi ~ z ffl,CO ",!;! "';: c:Ei gE~ '" Ol " "':l!~ '" 8~ ~ ~ -gB:5(1) :::::I5ro(/,l ..8"O,:t:.jg :5~!p.c.. :::::I _ ~ i O(l)()o. (I) C U) E E~:a@ 'Iii ~2,", c.!!! 't30 >.~C)-g ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ g ~;S c..~Q)5o ~~6~:Q rn-;'l(l)2Z > 0 C) U) oi'j -5-;.:g~t:: cEmg:2 .l!&!~H N '0 ~ 56~ .~ (l)1.L 3::"0 :5~5~ E:::-~~ ~g>o -OC~I.L (I) 0 (l)U rou-go:: ,g-gro~ 5.Q5~ 8 "-_~ <: ~$~(J) ..cQ).Q::J g'~ g>~ -g~'w-o ~c'Og~ ~ '" :== Z. ~-w 3:o.c~ 5 ~ ~.~ B~LU.S o ~ U Kl -3::<(.0 C) C (I) c .S.22.o (/,I..... +::: (/,I ctl ~ c e .S (I) 2 0'2 Q) Q.lt--: (l)O_S-oo -58g>(I)o ..... w-5N o-g.....=:Q 5ctlOcE rd 5 e.~.s C'w 0 (I) "0 '~ffiU.S2 (I) x>' E ~ ..... wE (1)'13 ~"O<(1O+::: (l)ro"O"O~ ~& ~~_U) C III I- -ci '" ~ l'l ~ ~ "5 c ~ c ~ ~ ~J!l ~ 'E Q)::J .g>g 'CO III ~ ~l2 e a o ~ III E .~ ~ ::;-g :;; '" 1i ~ 'e- o. ~ ~ z ~ z ... ~ ~ m :I: '5 o U) '" -' "0 C '" E ~ o (J) '" .... '" (J) @ ~ "0 Ii: E ~ "0 'w C '" '" c ~ ~ "- (') ctl 10 c S @ g ~ us l- E N "0 ~~5 = .... o o ~ Q Q '" ~ z " . ~. .... ~. .... .... .... .... .... = ~ Z " . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ E ~ E ~ > e 0. .E >- ~ "0 '" o '" c .2 i!! o l<' o o E '" "0 'S (') .... o o '1 '" o o '" c .~ "0 ~ E .c _ . -0- >-..... m .o~O ~m~ :1a e g " 0.'" ~ g-o:: -g()g ~ "- "0 2~~ "0 '" @ ~ (I) "'c'" 0.0$ @ ~ (J) ~~ :2 c 0. ~ 'v ffi ~ .o~" e.o :::::I ",~Ill ~ > '" ~ '" c Ol.c:a "'~"O ~ (1)-- o~.o '" ~ ~ ~-u -~ :a~E z.o:; ~~~ J2 ~';; ornz. ~ q5"o - 0. ~ @.Q~ (I) (I) ._ [)6}15 (I)-oJ!:! '" c ~ "0 " "0 c ~ 0. ~ ~ U) ~ z ~ z " . " . " ~ '~ U)" III '" ,,-' ~8~ &l1IJ a (!) ~f- :; III 'C '" e> 0 '" "- :;; 0 '5 ~ ~ ~ '" [ w 'C ~ 0 E '" ~ E "0 ~ '" 2(1)& E-B ~ -(J)lll al€CP ~~~ '" _'E .o"O~ ~ '" " '" 0 ~ "-"'Ill '" '1 '" Q ;:: 0. co o .... :;; o (J) "- ;;: co u. o CD o o N ~ ...~ ~ o w ~ D.. ..... w W J: C/) UJ UJ W 0:: C) o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o ~ >- ::S:i! :J..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....C/) u...... 00 >-W !::O 00:: a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ <( ..... ~ o f; ,_::l ~ C (',g., .$ lie II) ':al m P ::2 !,;s: Q) to "0 ::g ~~ '~~ t5 .,; ~ c o 0. ~ .. ,.. " E "O~ ~ 0> :g:2 g..s ~ ~ ~;S -510 ~~ 0- 1: ~ 0>0 =..c c ~ Uro "E -0'0> Cig> ~ " :c..c: - ~ 02 ~ c - - ";:: >- ~ ~ E(ij ,,> . :5..c:~ O>cg~ "_ 0>- ]iu::~ > ~- (!! .E .~ .~ ~-c '" 0. ~ l!!~l) 00 ,.. E ,;-o2:! Q).3Q) "00.0 ;u2 g..~ Q) :l 0 > cna:jg ~ z '" . *~ "'in "0 ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... c " a: ~ 0> " c 'i! Cl ~ c o ~"O ~ ,~ .E ll).. ....!..OJ ro () o>-S c . "2 ~ 0 ~-o :2 g>o 3:06 (1)012 0>00 U> :gIllUi lD"O- " ~ ~ ~ 0 '0'-00 ~ 15.~ Q)€ U (9 Q)'=' m"'''' ~,,~ C C C al"C 0 OOlDU = ., 'l' o o ;:: .. ~ Z ~ ~ .. J: '5 u '" ... ~ ,;, o ~ u ~ "e- o. c o '" .;; U " ,.. E @ ~ cU ~ Q) (ij"e Uo. E 6 .g :G c " .~ 'i ~ 6 ~~ "'C .S ~ 8" .~ " ~.e oB:: ~'" > ~ " ~ ~~ C15~ ~ o ~ o If 51 ~ i >- ~ ~ .... :t: (!) ii: "0 C " 0> c 'in ~ e ~ ~- >'" 0"- ,,;; "';" 0 - 0. :>.~ "", ~-g ~.e ,.."- ~ . - ~ ,,0> > C " ~ ~ " " c ~ ~2 "- c .~ ~ z ~ z o "0 o :;; o "0 :; o - - M ~ '" o - ~ 0> 'C B ~ 0> " c 'i! "0 E g 0> . 00 c 5 J- ~B~ -g ~~ffi Ec.:!: "5i,s gee.!) ~.mB moo :::~C9 13"1ij ~ ~(ij- aiO~ fEW- UJ'~~Eo =a~~ ~e!(O:1OCU rn.s:(5 Q)~a.gEz .S>.!: "El(l)roE6O:: >a>Q) rog>Q)"OwO ~Ein wc.>.coffi.s~ liP~..c L-ctI__E<( cnCll::l j!lJ::;:'l: > 'm~.a mo-_met- i.: Q) lll-;::O e-- C.cE 5:.Qj9<Pmo g.;S:o .....c!e.-.....: .- 0.... ~.e- m CD 't=i 0 ~.s 13 '0 c: 3: Q) c.~ C =:::l C>> <P c: Co e 3:~0'" cE~Bc."': o ~ oE.~~-g"fi o ~ f/.I ~ Q) g r::::"'O .... i: ctI "E ctl rn I/) Cll Q) (\] .s.!: 8 Ole.. U) -:-: Q)~ -c3:$ m.s E~ ~ ~oa.: ;>......~-g~U)Qj:5C1l~ m i6~ 0) ~~.~ 2'0 ~<( Q)Q).cEo..=fhalcOt- .~Eoif.o.c 3:::l60:';::;0 ~o...c (1)'- g >-~ L.. "1ii{gw .- Q)"'C 0 en r::::'" a.o~ffimEQ)O~::::JO ~~EO: Eg[~2~g: ~ ~ B :5 ~ ~ ~ 0 a..$! u. 0"-"0:;:::::; r::::::::Ja..s="OC)O "i.ilBQ)m8..cw:t:::Q)m "13en=g E<>i!S~";::wZ Q)"E B Q5 ""ffi U. en B E Q o Q) IV 0::: :g,13<>i!S:5 ~!!! I- oEr:::: ffi==~Z'~~ 2l'co- ~ ~.s= ~ :;::;:::::;u;s:ll. >':;:::::;o.Q)::::Jo"O"'Co :E mOo.r::::CTOggfir~-go ~Zmo~ZC)C)r::::l-mO ~ c ~ E ~ ~ " ~ '0 ~ 0> C " ~ " @ ~ ~ c ~ €' ~ 0. e 0. ~ > '" B E ~ ~ ~ ~ .3 o "0 o :;; <J e .. o o " o :;; o e .. o o " o :;; o e .. o Cl "- U ~ 0> ~ " 0. -;5 '" ,.. ~ " "- " 0> C " ~ " ~ "- "0 " Ii ~ 0> .llI 00 "0 -.; 'E ~ ~ lD E ~ E c .Q> m tl. N " is , '" ~ '" N '" ~ '" Q .. U .... 'I g: ~ '" "0 2 ~ ~ ~ C" E c ~ ~ .0 ~ " ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ t .;:l o c ,.. ~ '0 ~ en ~ Q)"- ~~ "'C~~CD !!!r::::mt--. 2 "Q 5 5 t):3 E"2 r:::: C)::g => 8r::::m"O Q).Qoffi .0 " C r:::: ~~-~ B :;:.E r:::: en"'C~55 ->, ~ Q) Cl 2"'~E c3~~.g g>~>:5 .Q:;:mU m Q) ~ 2 "'C.s=L.._ m-men O"'C a. r:::: ~ffio8 ~c.Eo Q)Q)00- :gE-;:m ~~m:S "Om:;:r:::: r:::: Q)4- Q) ~ 2i.8'O ro.Q~.:c :;: en";:: C) ~ ~ ~a:: :~titi-ci-ci .s"x"x ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) IV -- i~~~:5 ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ Q) .s= .s= >. Q) ~~~~~ ~ ~ 1ii E ~ ;S @ E ~ C9 B c ~ ~ c o '" " E .l' .E <( o "0 o :;; o e " o " ~:g "lD Cl~ ~ ~ :E €' ~ 0. e 0. .: 2 c ~ U c .2 B ~ "0 W " ~ i 2 -S B c e "- 0> C '" ~ "0 ~ '" U '" ... . Iii ~ is '" - M '" ~ "0 l! 2"CJm C'II.!2 t! 0<3= j 0> C '" ~ "0 .~ "0 " o '" " .0 ~ " "- .l' 2 " & ~ ~ ~ 8 E " 0. E 0. B U 2 :c ~ " E .~ o>~ c ~ ~ ~ o .- ~ 1!. i!~ :go> ~ ~ 0"" _ 0 ~ ~ - 0 E- ~ 2l ",ai ~~ ~ E 0_ ~~ .:c"g> .~~ ;; 32 o o lD c o '" ~ o -.; '" '0 c o '" i" " 0. E 0. 2:" B c ~ > .S €' ~ 0. e "- ~ Z 01 c '15 'i' c o o " o :;; o e .. o ~ E ~ "0 2 " -.; '" ,.. " ;;: '0 :;; 0> i'( ~ ~ o ~ c -"! -.; " ~ ~ /, (/ iI-A '.~ o '.~ o If ~ o '!1;! ;i'..... t:5 ill <:-.:0 'C/) :e ~ .'0:( ~.~ ~;);~ <a. ;?(f.) W ;\'/. "0 C " ~ c " a: " c u:: " o 1:5 S ~ c 8 ~ ~ "e "- ~ ~ o .~ > ~ .l' "0 ~ > e 0. 0. " C ~ ~ .0 ~ " .,; ~ ~ .c ~ "Q e ~"~ ~ l!! "5 " <( ~ .E .Q ~B ~'" ::::J "13 C"~ ~ 0. "'00 ~ Z ~ Z 01 c '15 01 C o ~ Z ~ ~ . Cl .~ "5 .., ~ ~ " Cl .~ "5 .., "0 C " Ii; ~ u ~ "- 0> .~ "~ ~ I- ~ 2 Q) ~ 55 2 u E e- c ~ ~ " ~ "- . ~ C).o "3 .!: E :E Cii .0) ~ ~';; ~ a.-g 0 ~~ ~ ~!!! L.. ~ j;l ~ 1-00:2 ~ ~ o .~ .. > ... 'l' ~ <0 o ... ~ 00 tL ;;: co u. o co W (!) < D.. ..... w W :I: C/) C/) C/) w 0:: Cl o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o s: >- ::S:i! ::I..... OZ wO ::a:::a: w, .....tJ) u...... 00 >-w !::O 00:: a. C/) ..... Z w ::a: w > o 0:: a. ::a: oJ <C ..... ~ o CD o o ~ ~ ~ o '0 C ~ E ~ ~ ~ .0 E .~ .l2 '" @ :0 ~ ~ I!? '" e 0. "0 C 8 ~ ~ "0 I!? .J'l ~ 0 ~ <Ii a. c.~~ <("2;ro ~ Q) .S I~LL ~.~ i @ CD ~ ~ ~ E <3"8> 8 '5 Q) t:: - ~g ~ ~ g ::1._ L.. ~~ ~ ~ *-8 ~ z ~ z :;; " '" o .!! "5 -, on c jg 0; () B 0,.2 l1l ~ ~ '" 0-0. ~ l!! 0;0. wB ~~ Ell. ~ ~ gr< "00; ~~ :8 a) 'COJ "0 '" "'TI "'''' c,,- "iij-e 0.", I!? ~ 0..0: otii wE w c l'l -;: e..2 a... c c -;;~ Q) (Q v.i a.2.~ El'l" 8ern clll() ow 0 u"1i) ~ 2~~ 'li) m"E c".o 8.9~ jji 'E .0 ~ w ~ .l2 I!? '" 0. I!? 0. .s ~ Z ~ Z ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, ~ -~ o C co Q) .g .Q c l!! 'co '_~ g,O r< c" ~:.. :c 8"6- 5c ~ ~E u. Ql ~ oW _E .ocO; OOl'l "" ~.!2 C ~~ -;:: fit E I 0 ~'O::: err: 'tii oCj ~ Q) (ii We a. Eo c.Q Q) ~-oCj 0- 0:: _co..:.:: 15 ~ Q) 0::: a. Q) c: g -0 ~O:::.$ l!! 'E~ttl'i::~~O ==~aJ-ctIro w~c:>>EO:::~ -o"Uo~e:!QiCtl ~ Co ~~ g"E TI ~c98:fd:~~ ~ ~ .;, ~ 0. .. ~ N ~ 0. .. <;> ~ C> ;;:: 0. g> -g-"g III en u'glB rn: c: c $.2 € g--g ~ g 8.51.a c..2 0 ro erna co .9 o c.!!!::: g.E -0 € mOl:: .213 ~ .~ u.s.a g1ii .- .92...9 ~ Q) E E ~ 2(1)c 0::_ .g .::; ~g8 oo'_g w l!! ~a>- 0_ -g .S III 0 ~ C"i 0 ctl ..2 @ ~g>l!! ~~~ 8 (J) ~~'~~;';;.E'gll c _.~l!! ~'E- E '2' rooa:;o.~ (ijo. 1 ~~.~ ~g ~ B a. Ec..c !is -0 ~ i ~~ ~~ ~ i Q) ClI II) CJl 0 @ a. Q) .!: '08 .S 0.. .a E ..Cl -c22 '00. :c 8 gz Q) (J,) 0. 5 ro c "C ctIg~.g.E LLg ~ l: ~oR~E.~ui~co tti ~ Eoro_>._r-e c: .....~cro-oU)8Cii'<:t '0 ~ 2e')$"s,a a.:!::c1:::J :;:oo..o';::C/)-o-g~:8&. 0 .~.g ~ ~ g>@"E.!;;;$ Q) .0 a;c..c:a'co~~5j~",l'll: O::2Cl-o~''''''OQl ffi~E.c~"~ "Or!"!::Q)([ Q)_..o;;Q) Q)......."'CQ) a.~:-0-0..u.."~L.. 11: co c a cD .... "'C v, Q) _..:z:.a fil:cS 3 3"~ ~~:J "'" en co co '<- .Q >. co .!:: enSC'\l$=~suQ) 0.131: wor!lJ)co> oL..E ~oo a..l-en8~Q)1-2;,;;;a.....Jo ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, w c :s o ~ :_~ 1:: , ~ DQ)EC) jg.gf!!j!! Q).,:: Cl c r! III 0 ro ~G:ld:~o 1:~o~~ ~Ci5.g~~ ~"~ en tnJ: l2:2o:g.Q> 5r,~1ll= r!_S~~ ~~&~~ .':::r: Q)-.J: OJ_1iilijO ~EenE.9 ;;f!!<h~.:.:: ~e~~~ :z:a..ena..O "' <;> ... ~ ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, ~ " " '" o .!! "5 -, o "0 'E <3 ~ u " ~ o c _ Z c :B ~ ~ E Q) S ~"5 .s ~~ ~ Wj!!nQ) c en Q) U .Q=a.e~ ~ COo.. f!! o&cl- g. Qj go ctlB<c f!! Q) !E :2 ~-5:gQ UJ .!:: m en I- S: OJ I- ~ ~ ,;, C> ;;:: 0. o '" f- ~ z ~ z ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, "' <;> .. .. ;;:: 0. c, c ." :E ~ '" 18 m .2 Q) ~-g 0.. -g ornE ro C/j 8 ~~ ~ E lJ) C... c:~"~ ::-g o~ (ij ~-e :~ a. > tnS 01: 2 Ol L.. ~ ~ ~ =6 m OQ) c c>. > 0 j!! m ~:g ..0 $~ -:: ro '0 :Jq:: 2 "'C ~ 0;; ~ lij m m ~ lE1: ~ S"'C ..... Q) _ ro c Cl:; 2 Rro f!!:J ro :J1: Ol U c .9 ~ 1ij..2 :e .....:J tnlJ) 0 :B~ ... l'l 8 E.l2 m:B .9 t Q) "0 L.. Q) ~:c %.,& 0 Q) ro "OI!? '" "'ffi lij ~ ~ ~ ~ tn~ ~ Cc/j .~~ c3 -~~ Q) C U. :J .~ro ()~ E~ L.. ~ ;; tn '0 Q) :6 u) tn.!:: la:C>-ui-~~~"gu) ~ o~ tn.i5'~.a Q) oc..u.!::a:s;;g a."'C'~ -g a.. :5.~ a. c1ij~s:l58~~ ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ Z ~ Z ~ " " '" o .!! "5 -, ~ ~ " '" o .!! "5 -, ~ ~ ~ '" o .!! "5 -, w .!! u:: U ~ "e- "- "- l5 w 1D ~ ~ oo 1D '" "0 ~ '" U ~ "e- "- "- ~ ~ ." ~ r< 1D '" "0 ~ '" '" c l'! (') w .!! u:: C l'! (') w ~ w '" ~ &i "0 C o '" w " .2 ~ w ~ o ~ w ~ o 'C '" > ~ S", 2.9'5 S 0.. c/j "'C C o L..:5 ~ ~ tiOl ~ E~;; r!.!:: :g -g c;;: g"g Q) 8g"~ C/j.a ~ cn 2Q) 3Q)Q) ~~ -g '9.8"e- c...... "0 II) L.. a. :J 5 C <C ~ "'C _ Q) J: Q) C -~~ ~ j~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L.. "'C (ij II) L.. :J~ Q) E:5.E ~~.9:rg ~0~"'C .;; ~ Q)_ g. . ~ C '* :JcOOl~u8~ II) g <c c..... ~..... u .~:g:2'lD ~ C = Q) (O=o..cc.8~.c E - >.:J ,.- .9 1:) 0 (i)"O i::' II) ;; ~Q)r551ij~~~ " -5"e-o~~ ~l2:5 ~~..J:g ~ E:6.e-"w u....a.. Q).g,<-="~ II)cI-8"- O:JE Cl rn Cf.) II) a; $ Q) CP..c -E ~ n- "- L.. CEil) :J co co!::!:: '='g'"l5. 0 ~~ a."'CI-f!!"-Q)Cf.)~o ~ c.Cf.) g.8 ..:! 1i rn Q) .e~.{~~~~~~ o.a w 0 ro Q)'O' Q) lZ.m~B"~-~a.~:5 ~1:)_!::q::cOIl)Bm ~.~ -g TS.Q ~ 5 c.. Q) 013 ~~~"~ Q) 5 Ca..!::enC/jO>5"O ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ Z '" c '0 '" c o ~ z ~ " ~ '" o .!! "5 -, !~ ~'" ~ H ~ " " '" o .!! "5 -, w ~ c .s w .!! ~ U ~ "e- "- 0; ~ .l2 w c o ~ '" -" " 0. oo ~ E '0 0; E .l2 ~ E ~ N ~ '" "0 C '" Iii .l2 w c ~ '6 c o () - '5 ~ w .0: U ~ '" ~ r< .9~ ~ ~ rn "e- 0:,,- ~$1: .~~ ~ Kg~ " .. ~ o 'C '" > w " o ~ ~ z '" c '0 '1' c o ('- ('- ('- ('- ('- ('- .~ ~ c '" Ow tJ$ E 5 Sg. .s ~ ..."0 W c ::::i co :5~ U Q) ~E 0; oo c o . "0 c"o~ 1lI l'l.~ "5~~ w 0. ~ C ~ 8.8~ ~ 0 '" ~ - ,., o ~ ~ o~:6 ~ w "0 C '" ~ 0 ~ m22 ~ "w 5- U.D. E m ~ 8 ~ w ~ $~:5 ~og j!! Q).!:: co:5"O "Oc~ w 0 ~ :<<~1: o .0 ~ 0",,,, <C=c C co"_ <(~~ ~ Z .. c '0 '1' c o '" '" l'! '" l'! " j c o ti ~ v oo - c 1lI "5 w c o () w " .2 ~ <0 o "- ::;: o oo "- :s: TO: MEMORANDUM Bill Hnghes, Director of Pnblic Works/City Engineer FROM: r/J/f; Brad Bnron, Maintenance Snperintendent DATE: SUBJECT: April 3, 2006 Monthly Activity Report - March, 2006 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of March, 2006: I. SIGNS II. TREES A. B. C. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired ~ -----1l ~ A. Total trees trimmed for sight distauce and street sweeping concerns ~ III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. B. Total square feet of A. C. repairs Total Tons 6.475 42 A. IV. CATCH BASINS 262 Total catch basins cleaned A. V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT o Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. B. Total locations 82 14,040 Total S.P. VII. STENCILING A. ---..!! New and repainted legends B. 200 L.P. of new and repainted red curb and striping R:\MAINT AIN\MOACTRPT\05.06\MARCH.OCi Also, City Maintenance staff responded to ...1L service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 2L service order requests for the month of Februarv, 2006. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 196 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of March. 2006 was $23,736.00 compared to $67,462.00 for the month of Februarv. 2006. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 11,315.00 $ 7,561.00 $ 4,860.00 cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer (Traffic) Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development) R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTRPT\05.06\MARCH.06 STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of March, 2006 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE OF WORK SIZE ,>i ......'.'i'.... .......i.ii.i.'i......i .de'.'::.. ":i.' i.J..'. " ',,,",,' LL ..'i"'" .i.... Date: 03/06 CITYWIDE TRASH & DEBRIS REMOVAL ALONG CITY ROW.'S # 4302 TOTAL COST $ 5,000.00 .' ..: , ..i..i...... '. '" !,'~' '/M.i> i: i'i i.'i"", ...ii' . .'. ....... . Date: 03/07/06 JOHN WARNER DESILTING POND REMOVAL OF APPROXIMA TEL Y 25 YARDS OF SILT FROM BASIN #5401 TOTAL COST $ 2,004.00 Date: 03/30106 WINCHESTER ROAD AT NICHOLAS INSTALL BOLLARADS ON CORNERS PER ROAD N/W & S/W CORNERS TRAFFIC REQUEST # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 6,315.00 .i, > '., ,.i;~+INC. CONTRACTOR: . .,lv.\m < ... Date: 03120106 SANTIAGO DESILTING PONDS REPAIRS TO DESILTING PONDS DUE TO HEAVY RAINS # 5401 TOTAL COST $ 5,557.00 Date: 03/06 SERVICE LEVEL "R" AREAS GRADED AREAS 3 TIMES DURING MARCH # 999-5402 I TOTAL COST $ 4,860.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $ 7,561.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 11,315.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 4,860.00 R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTRPT\05.06\MARCH.06 ~ ~ a o .c ~ N Ol => M"::lc::J 'E=~ C. = .... ..; lD it. -g ..~\ - ,.,'" ;!:: OJ ;;:io. EallD -@:::::a:l en"- .... <D E 2i _.0", '" => ~ ClCllo.. CIl ~t- <0 ~o:: !i2owg >a..oC";'l OWZIO :Ja::<co rc>Z~ ::)!:::~a:: o..;:::z<( lLl--W OU<(>- ....<(::;:...J z>-....<( W..JW(J ::;::J:W'" ........0::- O::ZI-LL <(0'" fh::;: Cl 0::", l!o ~~ 0::;: U Cl W ~....'" ~Wo O::...J . o "-!If 3:::;:::;: o U 0:: W ~ ::l a o 0:: s: "'" ~ 0:: ~ u. o w "- o U III '" '" cO .... ~ N- ~ ~ '" "'... .... ,.: CD Ui OlC So 0.... o u. ~ .. " 0" III ~ .... <i! :J: 0.. ~ '" o '" '" '" ~ '" ~ '" 00 00 &tic ~'" .., ",- '" '" ... ,..: .., '" .,; ... ~ '" 00 "'0 c:id ..,'" '" oS '" '" '" N cD o '" ,.: ~ '" 00 00 dci "'''' "'N ....... ... <Ii 00 ~ ~ @j " M '" 00 00 do "'''' ..,'" ...~ N oS 00 00 00 cio "'''' 00 CD en ~ g''E ;;:-.. c..g> wU.u o::"u tt:;D.. w" I:g ::J Cll O/l lD 0:: ::J U ~ ~ W o 0; .:: w w u. !If w z ::; Cll z ii: 12 ~ ... "l ~ ... Cl ,.: '" '" '" '" ol .., N .,; '" ~ '" o o o '" o o o o '" o '" '" ol .., N .,; '" ~ '" N .., Cl <Ii ... O'!. ~ 0; o z w Cll W ...J Cll Z >= Z ~ W III ::J o :r: 3!: o o o ... '" .,; ~ '" o~ OCl oeD "'''' Cl'" cD o~ Z;~ o o ol .., N <Ii ~ '" 00 0'" cici ON "'''' .c:<<:i ..,~ "'''' o o o '" 00 O~ dci 0'" Cl.., C'Ii~ "'... o '" '" o o o '" 00 o ~ c:icri ON Cl'" M~ "'''' o '" .... o o ~ "l. ~ '" 00 0'" ci~ 0.., ON .;'" '" .., '" ~ o '" - i.: .~ .8 " .. ;;...J ::;: o w ~ ...J "- w 0:: III Z Cll 0; 0'" o ~ ci~ o Cl N'" cON' "'''' 0'" OCl ocd '" '" ....., _~ Lri' ~'" '" ,0'" 0'" g~ '" .., "'''' .., ~ 00 0'" cici '" ~ ;;r;~ Cl 00 0'" d~ 0.., "'N "'''' o ~ ..:.: i.: .!i 0 ~.o $ .. .....J ::;: o W ...J ~ '" ~ III Z Cll 0; o ... o ... ~ '" Cl Cl ... :s '" <Ii ~ a;,;..i Olin .. 0 'Ou o u. ~ .. " 0" III >= ~ Cll '" .... 06 Cl o tf '" ~N ...'" LON "'''' "'... cn~ ~ ....... "'... '" o '" ,..: ~ "'- ~ ;;Ii '" 00 ClO cicci ClO ..,'" V~M ;;r;~ '" o o o ~ '" ai .., '" 00 ~C! ...~ ~'" tl5r-: "'''' NN '" N '" N cD .., .... .; ~ '" "'0 ~O <Do ~'" Cl .; '" .... 0 '" ~ '" .... ol '" '" .,; ... '" "'0 ....0 coiN 0'" ~... "';M "'''' "'~ .... ~ in u; .5 a; In C .. c olD" w .c :J: U W ...J U III ...J W z :J: :J: U W ~ Z ;;! o o w ::;: ::;: 12 .... III W w 0:: .... W III ::J o :r: 3!: Cl "! ~ ... ~ .,; '" o ... .,; ~ ~ '" '" N ,..: ~ ~ '" '" o Cl cD ... '" N o Cl cD ... '" N 0; ~ W ::J a W 0:: 0:: w o 0:: o W U :;; 0:: w III o o o ... o o o '" o o o '" N ... o o o '" ... .., o o o '" .., ... 0; .... ::J o ...J <i! U III 0:: ::J o :J: 0:: w .... !Ii: .., Cl ~ '" o .... '" Cl N .,; Cl ... o '" '" '" N .,; Cl '" ",- '" '" Cl ~ N N .,; .... .... .,; '" ~ o '" ol '" ... .,; '" o .... .., ... .,; '" q ~ '" a' :Ii ai w "- ~ OJ I- "- '" <.J 1l '" z " I- Z ~ '" N '" cD Cl .., ai o q ~ '" o o o o '" '" Cl ~ ol ~ '" :f Cl '" o .., o '" c:i cO '" ... .., .,; '" '" o o .... o .... ci c:i '" '" .., o '" '" o o ~ o N ci N '" '" '" ai ... N '" o .:: z w ::;: w < !a! o W w 3: ;;: d Ii III <i! l3 .... o.......r-...o NO", 1'-"'0 "'0 C\lO)C\lC\lCOLQCO "'''' ~ ~l2 l!? ~ ~ ~ N", "'0 C"')C\lCOLQCOC\lcn '" ~ 1'-- . ~N COC\l~ CO~ C\l_ '" ...'" """':c6 N <6 N '" 0 Nu? 0 w '" ... '" '" '" "'0> '" z ... q N ... '" '" N " ",Z <6 <6 <<i '" 0 " wO N '" '" '" 0> '" ~ "'" <;; '" '" I' "" '" '" ~ "m >- ~ "0 '" ;;;!~ "' ~ ~ Q mm Z ~ 00.......0 NO", N"'O "'0 ~~~cno~ '" 0> '" "i "'''' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ "'0 ;;l; ~ '" ~ " "'- . ~ . ~ '" ~ '" '" <6 ~ 0 N cO N ~ '" ~ ,,~ I'- .". .". 0 '" '" " '" q N '" '" '" 13 'E ~m oJ cO <6 '" '" N '" '" '" ~ :;; ~ IDU '" <;; '" '" Z ~ $:! ~ '" ;! '" E ro ID ~~ Z " ~ e <' 0 "'''- :;; 0' 0 tIl W OOC\lO 000 000 00 COC"')C\lLQOO '" N 0 '" .... "'~'" 0> .". .". lI:: w ~ 0 0 0 N 0 '" 0: ....... :J: 10 0 0 0 ~ .-: 0 "-0 '" '" '" '" ;;: :;0 ~ '" I'- O'l' ~ .". 0 '" I'- :; O:g :; '" III lI::O 0:'" ::> O~ "- u. ;;:W 00 00 0 00 1'-"'0 ~O cocnr-...C\lOO 0> .". '" I'- 0 W>- "'''' '" 0 "'0 I'- '" I'- '" 0> "'- 0 0 I'- . ~ 0> I'- .... O:;;! <ri 0 '" <ri ~ 0 Z '" '" '" '" '" W ~O '" N 0_ '" :; ZtIl ~ ~ ~ 0 W- <;; N <;; '" ~ ....u. '" '" Z "- <! w :; 0 00.......0 NO", "''''0 NO 00 "'N 0'" '0 '" 0 0 ~ ~ '" 0 NO "'~ I'- '" I'- ... N N . ~ . ~ ~ '" N <6 N '" I'- <6 ->i '" .". '" '" .". ~ ~ .". 0>_ N 0 I'- <<i '" en oJ '" '" '" '" N 0> <;; '" ~ 10 '*~~ lL. ~ ~ Q) I- een I- CO e.... CO 6-~en 6-CI)()O CI) Q) Q)(,) '" 10 Cl.... CO I- ro oCt -a g .ffi.... (f) 0 1-0 <(()O.... Cl Z ;;: ii! lii .... ~ .... Z o o "$ lL. H u. .~ en ~......... ill Cltll e .~O ::i 't)() ClJ!1.... .5 :g oCt .9- e.... .::: roO 00 00.... "ll"ll~ E ij en E EO .C Q)(,) f-O:..... :G [fit!: ~ ~O .... f-.... tIl 0: o .... ~ .... Z o o w w 0: .... 00 w 0: ~ , (9 Z ~~ "-0 000 ,,::;;! c:i13 0::.... ;;: w 0: o w o ~ Z W .... Z <! :; >- .... C3 -'" <::'0 " <:: '0 E ~ :g 2 iil'.l!J m E....I <3 '0 " <c"ll= ~'O~'O - '" UQ)(f)Q)E~'~() ctl = e Q) ctl 15...s'Ci.iE5:ar~ ~~~~ .0:: 5 (f)(f)J::(I)S~I ceO Q) .;:: I- .2>.2>m ~ q Q) .m Cl)CI)()I-O::Z<( "'- lOlL. " C" 5-00 ~ ' o::~ E ~ 0:: tIl .... tIl o o g .... Iii "E o ~ U:!:: .~ ::::: " 1: 00(9 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 {/UU.......,...yyyyUj._..,....,.,.lIII'.....{ .....',Ciii..'.'.... ',.', .'. .' '. DATE I.............",..'.', /10 ,TJ!,L" 03/01/06 TIERRA VISTA REMOVED 41 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/01106 28860 OLD TOWN FRONT REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/01106 L YNDIE LANE AT TARGET CENTER REMOVED 125 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/01106 STONEWOOD APARTMENTS REMOVED 50 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 03/02/06 RANCHO VISTA ROAD AT MARGARITA ROAD REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/02/06 VIA CORDOBA AT THE PARK REMOVED I S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/02/06 OLD TOWN THEATER REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/02/06 CALLE MEDUSA AT ENFIELD REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/02/06 MARGARITA ROAD AT CALABRIA DRIVE REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/03/06 FELIX VALDEZ AT 6TH STREET REMOVED 290 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BRIDGE AT OLD TOWN FRONT REMOVED 20 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 FELIX VALDEZ AT 6TH STREET REMOVED 142 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 28860 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 28900 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 PEACH TREE AT VINE REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 27911 JEFFERSON REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/06/06 NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT NICOLAS REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 27423 YNEZ ROAD REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 SANTIAGO BRIDGE REMOVED 60 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 PIO PICO AT AMARIT A REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 VIA RIO TEMECULA / A VENIDA DE MISSIONES REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 VIA CORDOBA AT VIA DEL CORONADO REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 MUlRFIELD DRIVE AT PECHANGA PARKWAY REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:\MAINT AIN\WKCMPL TD\GRAFFlTJ\OS.06\MARCH ~;;i\,i_ i'.iiD ,DiTiiii,;<;D)< 1.<.".;,..'< . ." ," > DATE ,'. i ". '. i";;;!i.;i ,'i.,.'.'" '<"Y'.;DW! 03/07/06 CALLE PINA COLADA REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/07/06 ENFIELD AT RIVERTON REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/08/06 PIO PICO AT AMERIT A REMOVED 210 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/08/06 MIRA LOMA AT EDISON PLANT REMOVED 885 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/09/06 WINCHESTER CREEK AT RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 36 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/09/06 PUJOL STREET AT MAIN STREET REMOVED 40 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 03/10/06 SANTIAGO AT QUIET MEADOW REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 3/06 6TH STREET AT FELIX VALDEZ REMOVED 50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI O3/I3/06 PUJOL LOT REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 3/06 MIRA LOMA AT EDISON PLANT REMOVED 145 S.F. OF GRAFFITI O3/I3/06 K MART ON YNEZ REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I3/06 28860 FRONT STREET REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/13/06 VIA NORTE AT CALLE PINA COLADA REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 5/06 CAMPANULA AT SUNNY MEADOWS REMOVED 55 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 5/06 VIA PUEST A DEL SOL AT PASO RA YO DEL SOL REMOVED 104 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/16/06 YNEZ COURT ON STORAGE BUILDINGS FACING YNEZ RD. REMOVED 1,395 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 6/06 SASSARI COURT AT CAPRI WAY REMOVED 90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/16/06 DEL REY W/O PINA COLADA REMOVED 70 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/I 7/06 NO. GENERAL KEARNY BRIDGE REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 42 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 NO. GENERAL KEARNY AT CAMINO CAMPOS VERDES REMOVED 380 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 FELIX VALDEZ AT 6TH STREET REMOVED 225 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 PUJOL STREET AT MAIN STREET REMOVED 425 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 28465 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET REMOVED 155 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20106 GRANNY'S ANTIQUES / FELIX VALDEZ REMOVED 460 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 LOMA LINDA AT VIA DEL CORONADO REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 CAMINO OLITEATWOLFVALLEY REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/20/06 DIAZ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAfFJTIIO;'i.06IMARCH , .....', ,.. ');':.;.;.W._Y... \......\.'j.w6i... ...' .....'...',' ......T; ,~~+c,u 03/20106 YNEZ AT OVERLAND REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/2 I 106 RAINBOW CREEK BRIDGE REMOVED 667 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/21/06 RANCHO WEST APARTMENTS ON PUJOL STREET REMOVED 49 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/2 1/06 APPLEBEE'S ON HWY 79 SO. REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/21/06 SHARON STREET AT LIANNE COURT REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/21/06 JEFFERSON SIO DEL RIO (FAST SIGNS) REMOVED 365 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/21/06 KOHL'S ON HWY 79 SO. REMOVED 69 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 03/22/06 MIRA LOMA AT EDISON PLANT REMOVED 920 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/22/06 NICOLAS ROAD AT NO. GENERAL KEARNY REMOVED 125 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/22/06 28800 FRONT STREET REMOVED 245 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/22/06 JOSEPH ROAD AT SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/22/06 40945 WINCHESTER REMOVED 10 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 346 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 362 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 1-15 AT WINCHESTER REMOVED 226 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 A VENIDA DE MISSIONES REMOVED 700 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 RENAISSANCE VILLAGE PUJOL STREET N/O MAIN ST E/S REMOVED JO S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 28500 PUJOL STREET BEHIND BLOCK WALL REMOVED 140 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 I ST STREET BRIDGE UNDERSIDE REMOVED 56 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 28322 OLD TORN FRONT STREET IN ALLEY REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 BUTTERFIELD STAGE BRIDGE REMOVED 1,335 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 TEMECULA LANE AT TEMECULA CREEK SLOPES REMOVED 112 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/27/06 WINCHESTER AT RUSTIC GLEN UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/28/06 29502 SOLANA REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/29/06 YNEZ AT PREECE REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/29106 MIRA LOMA AT EDISON STATION REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/29/06 MARGARITA AT RANCHO VISTA REMOVED JO S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFfTlIO).06\MARCH '..,i.....<..<_.'.'.<.'.,.." <i.\...> " ,D,\,TE .', '.,,' 03/29/06 WOLF V ALLEY ROAD REMOVED 90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/29/06 PECHANGAPARKWAY REMOVED 134 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 03/3l/06 CALLE MEDUSA AT LA SERENA REMOVED 36 S,F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 14.040 TOTAL LOCATIONS 82 R;\MAJNT AIN\WKCMPLTDlGRAFFlTJIO).O(,IMARCH ~ ~~ ~> ~o U~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~t= ~~ o~ ~~ ~~ ~'" Uo o ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (') W c . > 0 z b 0 I- D.. W (fl I- el u... ::l <I: 0 > en ...J + ::l ..., w I- z ::l en ..., 0 > () <I: + :;; ...J 1C D.. <I: I- a: <I: :;; t-- r"-J'.. ~ t-- m 104 b w v u. .....v z ~ <I: ..., ~ t-- I- 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 ~m~~M~m~~M~m~~M~m~~M~m~~M~ ~~~~~~MMMMMNNNNN~~~~~ "'>nN 00 '" 00 rJ) ...:i ...:i < U ...:i ~ o Eo; ~ ~.<:: ,,28'2>.'" "..0 '" "" '" " ~~::E<::E~ .... ........ '" '" '" ~"S..ob"S"S :;:S<U Q) Q) >,'~~.8;>o -,.., -0 0 <U ~<~OZQ 'D '"'0 0;0 "'N >< ",<:'"l ;~ '"'< oS fI'J. ~ -,., .sQ o E-<~ '<>00 !"l00 ~Q\N lrlO\ !"l0\ r-:' 0\ fA- .... o o .......'" .00= 0< 0 0; CIlUU '" ""' '" o u trll.rlO t"-NO N0d V) '" _ \Or---\O lI"l'e1l~ 00 -::::t-('f') Y3-~~ ~1:S << ;;;,""' 0'0 ",0 ~ _l.rlO O'V'J'-:::;t "',,",0 0.".f.q-~ - - l-.< .I-o"'l-r ([) Od) r ,.D-.l-r..D..D ~"'~'.~ <;;;" E~S S g .E ~.~. ~ ~ ~5h ~ 8 ~ B ro(])~p.;.~:::I~:::IouoQ) ,...,~""<"",...,,...,<"'OZO .... ........ '" <1J <1J r ..DI-;..D,.o >'01.<::_ ~8]88 a 2 u.- :;:10 0 Q) ([) g...D ~ ~ f;' ~ ~ 0.00...... ;;> u ro(])'~<"=:::l=:::I;::louo.ll) ........~~ .o<';1--,1--,-<r:cnOZO CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 L: ..,y",i%;'~;;,frif.(f~~~f_ ff)!i0;~~';';'~: f~i:f;!~~II'~I~~ii~~~~lfci.rif TOTAL VALl;, ,',. !ii . fXi; 'f ";f', f'ffff '.','.'.. 'T I.XY!"W'Y TONS . . ,.'...fK!y!e! 03/0 1/06 DIAZ ROAD AND A VENIDA ALVARADO POTHOLES 12 TEMP AC 03/0 1106 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD AT GOLF COURSE POTHOLES 8 TEMP AC 03/01/06 JEDEDIAH SMITH POTHOLES 6 TEMP AC 03/01/06 ASTEROID AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD POTHOLES 6 TEMP AC 03/02/06 MARGARITA ROAD AT RANCHO VISTA ROAD POTHOLES 4 TEMP AC 03/02/06 NICOLAS ROAD AC OVERLAY 929 5 03/02/06 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD ACOVERLAY 274 t 03/06/06 OLD TOWN AC OVERLAY 235 2.5 03/08/06 OLD TOWN AC OVERLAY 315 3 03/09/06 PAUBA / NICOLAS ROAD AC OVERLAY 1,295 5 03/l5/06 CORTE SALINAS R&RA.C. 108 4.5 03/l6/06 MARGARITA AT SOLANA R & R A.C. 48 5.5 03/l6/06 TIERRA VISTA AT RIO NEDO A.C. OVERLAY 123 t 03/20/06 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD E.P. REPAIR 320 4.5 03/22/06 RANCHO VISTA W/O BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD A.C. OVERLAY 1,084 5.5 03/23/06 RANCHO VISTA AT CALLE RESACA A.C. OVERLAY 860 2.5 03/27/06 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AT RANCHO VISTA A.C. OVERLAY 848 4 TOTALS.F.OFREPAIRS 6.475 TOTAL TONS 42 R:\MAINTAINIWKCMPL TD\ASPHALT.RrR\O~.06\ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 DATE ..;ci>iiMis;s.!,.,_"CiC;RII.'y'C);>Y2SSS_'.,..".,C,.",'.'",,> . 03/01/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 39 CATCH BASINS 03/02/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED IS CATCH BASINS 03/06/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 03/07106 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 03107/06 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED IS CATCH BASINS 03/09106 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 6 CATCH BASINS 03/13/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 14 CATCH BASINS 03/15/06 AREAS #1 & #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS 03120/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 03/21/06 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 32 CATCH BASINS 03/23/06 AREAS #1 & #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 32 CATCH BASINS 03/27106 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS 03/28/06 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS 03/29/06 CITYWIDE "RAIN" CLEANED & CHECKED 7 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 262 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLETD\CA TCHBASI05.06\MARCH CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 ~ i ",'!ilii~l;[Jli,d_;;;;;)W!)(i; X;".~ ; , '-- , I 03/07/06 RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA TRIMMED 2 R.O.W. TREES 03/1 0/06 V AIL RANCH TRIMMED 3 R.O.W, TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED ~ R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTDlTREES\05.06\MARCH.06 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 DATE DATE WORK REC'D . ... ,..',' LQCA]IQl'l '., REQl]EST COMPLETED 02/17/06 31855 CALLE NOVELDA NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH SIGNS 02/1 7/06 02/28/06 RANCHO CALIFORNOIA ROAD AT MARGARITA TREE TRIM 03/01/06 02/28106 30835 LOLITA ROAD MUD 03/01/06 02/28106 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD & LA SERENA 2 MATTRESSES 02/28/06 03/02/06 42591 ESMERADO COURT ROOT PRUNE 03/20/06 03/03106 31928 CERCLE CHAMBERTIN TREE TRIMMING 03/03/06 03/06/06 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT HOPE WAY DEBRIS REMOVAL 03/06/06 03107/06 30360 COLINA VERDE TREE TRIMMING 03/07/06 03107/06 30960 JEDEDIAH SMITH TREE REMOVAL 03/07/06 03/07/06 43318 CIELO DE AZUL TREE TRIMMING 03/07/06 03/07/06 CORTE ALMERIA SNS MISSING 03/07/06 03107/06 PAUBA AT MARGARITA POTHOLE 03/0706 03/10106 45884 HOPACTONG DEBRIS REMOV AL 03/1 0/06 03/1 0/06 31024 OAK HILL DRIVE TREE PLANTING 03/1 0/06 03/10/06 33042 ROMERO DRIVE DOWN TREE 03/10/06 03/13106 PAUBA ROAD AT VIA DEL MONTE POTHOLES 03/13/06 03/13/06 NICOLAS ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/13/06 03113/06 LIEFER ROAD ROAD GRADING 03/13/06 03/14/06 WINCHESTER ROAD POTHOLE 03/14106 03/15/06 30360 COLINA VERDE A.C. REPAIRS 03/15/06 03/15/06 42114 SWEET SHADE LANE DEBRIS REMOVAL 03/15/06 03/16/06 43522 TIRANO DRIVE OIL SPILL 03/16/06 03/17/06 30099 LA PRIMAVERA TREE TRIMMING 03/17106 03/17/06 KOHL'S ON HWY 79 SO. SIGN DOWN 03/17/06 03/17106 CAMINO SAN DIMAS TREE TRIMMING 03/17/06 R:\MAINT AIN\WRKCOMPLTDlSORSIO.:l.OfiIMARCl-IJ)() ..,".....'. . '.",..,.... ... .....;0;. .0i{',!'" I....e i0~i2<. "0> DATE ? ./..i,{ DATEWORK [i.i!! ..'.'.,.. . '.", REC'D '. , ' '., .. ',." COMPLETED 03/20/06 33040 ANASAZI DRIVE TREE TRIMMING 03/20/06 03/20/06 DEL RIO ROAD DEBRIS PICK-UP 03/20/06 03/20/06 PEACH TREE POTHOLE 03/20/06 03/20/06 31359 BRITTON CIRCLE ROOT PRUNING 03/20/06 03/22/06 42368 RIO NEDO DRIVE STANDING WATER 03/22/06 03/22/06 CABO STREET AT VALLEJO TREE TRIMMING 03/22/06 03/23/06 29685 VIA MONDO WATER LINE BROKEN 03/23/06 03/23/06 STARLIGHT RIDGE TREE TRIMMING 03/23/06 03/23/06 30184 MIRA LOMA TREE TRIMMING 03/23/06 03/24/06 41872 CASCADE COURT A.C. REPAIR 03/24/06 03/24/06 46169 JOHN WILLIAM WAY DEBRIS PICK-UP 03/24/06 03/24/06 32012 CAMINO MAREA ROOT PRUNING 03/24/06 03/24/06 42235 AGENA STREET TREE TRIMMING 03/24/06 03/24/06 31600 CORTEPADRERA LIFTED SIDEWALK 03/24/06 03/27/06 CORTE EL DORADOO S.N.S. MISSPELLED 03/27/06 03/28/06 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT BUSINESS PARK DRIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL 03/28/06 03/29/06 41731 BOREALIS DRIVE TREE DOWN 03/29/06 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 42 I R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTDlSORS\05.06\MARCH.06 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 HA'I'l<, .....,.e,.e;v;u....', -"5 " 'i .'.. '..".,.. '.' i.......u... ',.2!>...... 03/02/06 VILLAGE ROAD AT TOWNSHIP ROAD REPAIR 2 SIGNS 03/02/06 SOLANA 250' PAST MARGARITA ROAD INSTALL I SIGN 03/02/06 VIA EDUARDO AT END OF STREET REPLACE I SIGN 02/03/06 WINCHESTER ROAD E/O YNEZ ROAD REPAIR 2 SIGNS 03/06/06 MAIN STREET BRIDGE REPLACE 2 DELINEATORS 03/07/06 MIRA LOMA AT RANCHO VISTA REPLACE R4-7 03/07/06 DE PORTOLA AT LA PAZ REPLACE R-l 03/07/06 PECHANGA PARKWAY REPLACE R2-50 03/08/06 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ REPLACE R4-7 03/09/06 VIA ALHAMBRA AT CORTE ARGENTO INSTALLED 3N.W.S. 03/09/06 JEFFERSON N/O WINCHESTER REPLACED 2 R4-7, 2 "K" MARKERS 03/13/06 MARGARITA AT SOLANA REPLACED R4-7, "K"MARKER 03/1 3/06 OVERLAND AT YNEZ REPLACED R4-7, "K"MARKER 03/1 4/06 WINCHESTER AT ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH REPLACED R-26 03/1 4/06 CAMINO GALLEGOS AT VIA ALLRIZO REPLACED S.N.S. 03/14/06 CALLE BALLENTINE AT MONTELEGRO REPLACED R-l 03/1 4/06 SWALLOW COURT AT RORIPAUGH RANCH REPLACED S.N.S. 03/15/06 REDHAWKAREA REPLACED 5 R-26, 2 R4-7, R-I, SNS 03/1 6/06 MEADOWS N/O McCABE REPLACED 4 R4-7, 4 "K" MARKERS 03/20/06 CITYWIDE REPAIR II SIGNS 03/21/06 CAMPANULA S/O DE PORTOLA REPLACE R-26 03/21/06 CALLE PIEDRA ROJO REPLACE RI-I 03/21/06 V AIL RANCH PARKWAY AT CALLE PIEDRA ROJO REPLACE R4-7 R:\MAINT AINIWKCMPLTDlSIGNS\.05.06\MARCH.06 i;; ,'..eLi'.. (J~~iNiJ\{ij;j;i;i!{iC\'''\;! ~;' " , DATE i', << ..'" <<!J!; 03/21/06 MARGARITA AT MORAGA INSTALL "C"PKG 03/21/06 NICOLAS AND WALCOTT REPLACED 24 CARSONITES R4-7, R3-4, 3 TYPE "K", RIO-20A, 03/22/06 WINCHESTER AT YNEZ INSTALLED 2 RIO-ll 03123/06 REDHA WK AREA REPLACE 4 SIGNS 03/28/06 REDHA WK AREA REPLACE 5 R-26, W-17 03/29/06 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE REPLACE 6S.N.S. 03/29106 REDHAWKPARKWAY AT PASEOPARALLON REPLACE W-31, 2 R-26 , TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED -2l! TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED ---1J TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED ~ R:\MAINT AIN\WKCMPLTD\SIGNS\.05.06\MARCH.06 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF MARCH, 2006 DATE ij'.,. ..'."".'.'i.j;.;j'~;j;jii~ i,?? ,"..',...'? l\;''!;;;;i~~ili i.,..';, ". .."...... i,! ii';ii;i<"'<<j:'i I" ' " 03/02106 VIA EDUARDO - PECHANGA PARKWAY TO PARSIPPANY COURT INSTALL 200 LF. RED CURB TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS --.!! NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 200 R:\MAINT AIN\WRKCOMPLTD\STRIPINGl05.06\MARCH.06