HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-05 CC Ordinance
I
I
I
ORDINANCE NO. 06-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY
OF TEMECUlA AMENDING SECTIONS 17.06.030,
17.08.030 AND 17.34.010 OF THE TEMECUlA
MUNICIPAL CODE, PROHIBITING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES WITHIN THE
CITY
THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECUlA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOllOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. The Planning Commission considered this Ordinance and the Negative
Declaration on April 5, 2006, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at
which time the City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify
either in support or opposition to this matter.
B. At the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-28 recommending
approval of the Ordinance by the City Council.
C. The City Council considered the Ordinance and Negative Declaration on
April 25, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the
City Staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support
or opposition to this matter.
D. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan and
each element thereof.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines
and declares that:
A. The voters of the State of California approved Proposition 215 (codified as
Health & Safety Code 11362.5 et seq. and entitled The Compassionate Use Act of
1996).
B. The State enacted SB-420 in 2003 (Health & Safety Code Sections
11362.7 to 11362.83) to clarify the scope of the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 and to
allow cities and other governing bodies to adopt and forge rules and regulations
consistent with SB-420.
C. In May 2001, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in
United States v. Oakland Buyers' Cooperative and Jeffrey Jones holding that
R:/Ords 2006/0rds 06-05
I
I
I
distribution of medical marijuana is illegal under the CSA and there is no medical
necessity defense allowed under federal law.
D. On June 6, 2005, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Gonzales v.
Raich which held that Congress, under the Commerce Clause of the United States
Constitution, has the authority and, under the Federal Cohtrolled Substances Act 21
USC Section 841 (CSA), power to prohibit local cultivation and use of marijuana even
though it would be in compliance with California law.
E. In light of these decisions, the City Council finds that it would be
inconsistent and contrary to the public health, safety, and general welfare to permit the
establishment of medical marijuana dispensaries, as defined herein, within the City
insofar as to permit such activities may subject the City and/or its officials and
employees to prosecution under federal law and would otherwise constitute illegal
activity under federal law.
F. Until such inconsistency is resolved between the federal and state laws
with respect to medical marijuana, it is the intent of the Council to prohibit medical
marijuana dispensaries within the City of Temecula.
G. Anecdotal evidence indicates that medical marijuana dispensaries are
subject to a significantly higher incidences of burglaries and robberies at the site than
other businesses, robberies of patrons leaving the dispensaries, loitering and nuisance
activities in and around the sites, and persons without medical need attempting to
purchase marijuana at the sites.
H. Neither the Compassionate Use Act nor its implementing legislation
authorizes medical marijuana dispensaries nor requires the City to provide for medical
marijuana dispensaries.
I. This Ordinance is necessary to preserve the public health, safety and
general welfare of the City of T emecula and is not in conflict with the general laws.
J. This Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan and each
element thereof.
Section 3. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the
City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that City staff prepared an Initial
Study of the potential environmental effects of this Ordinance amending the City's
Development Code to prohibit medical marijuana dispensaries (the "Project"). Based
upon the findings contained in that Initial Study, City Staff determined that there was no
substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment
and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City Staff provided public notice
of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as
required by law. The public comment period commenced on March 4, 2006 and expired
on April 3, 2006. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and
R:/Ords 2006/0rds 06-05
2
I
I
I
inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City
Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92589. The City Council has
reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Negative
Declaration prior to and at the April 25, 2006 public hearing, and based on the whole
record before it, finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance
with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant
effect on the environment; and (3) the Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the City Council. Based on the findings set forth in this
Section, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for the
Project.
Section 4. Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code is hereby
amended to add the definition of "Medical Marijuana Dispensary" to Section 17.34.010
to read as follows:
"Medical Marijuana Dispensary. A facility or location, whether fixed or mobile,
which provides, makes available or distributes marijuana to a primary caregiver,
a qualified patient or a person with an identification card issued in accordance
with California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.5 et seq."
Section 5. The use matrices of Sections 17.06.030 and 17.08.030 of the
Temecula Municipal Code are hereby amended to establish a Medical Marijuana
Dispensary, as defined in Section 17.34.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code, as a
prohibited use in all zones of the City.
Section 6. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares
that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof
irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 7. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be
published and posted in the manner required by law.
R:/Ords 2006/0rds 06-05
3
I
I
I
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 9th day of May, 2006.
.ATTEST:
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
~'MaY",
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 06-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 25th day of April, 2006,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 9th day of May, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: 0
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: 0
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
R:/Ords 2006l0rds 06-05
Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar,
Washington, Roberts
None
None
None
. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
4