HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-094 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 97-94
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RESTATING THE TERMS OF
RESOLUTION NO. 97-45, WHICH ESTABLISHED AND
IMPOSED A PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE, AND CLARIFYING CERTAIN MATTERS IN
RESOLUTION 97-45
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Short Title. This Resolution may be referred to as the "Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee Resolution" of the City of Temecula.
Section ~. lh~rpose. The purpose of this Resolution is to establish the amount of the
public facilities development impact fee and to establish certain standards for the administration
of such fees.
Section 3. Findings. The City Council, after review of the City of Temecula
Development Impact Fee Study (the "DIF Study") dated January 8, 1996 and prepared by David
M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., and after review of additional staff reports, and testimony and
information received at a noticed public hearing on this matter, makes the following findings:
A. Based upon the land uses permitted by the City's General Plan and growth trends of
actual development within the City, the City anticipates that 54,422 dwelling units and 55.526
million square feet of non-residential development will be developed in the City between 1995 and
buildout.
B. The DIF Study analyzes the demand expected to be generated by future development
for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities. Based on
this analysis, the DIF Study contains estimated levels of service for street system, park and
recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities that are necessary to serve anticipated
development within the City of Temecula through buildout.
C. Present and future sources of Federal, State, County and City revenues are insufficient
to fully fund construction of the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and
library facilities needed to accommodate the demands of anticipated residential and non-residential
development.
D. The only fair and equitable method of securing adequate revenue necessary to fund the
construction of these facilities is through a fee based on the extent to which new development
generates additional demand for street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and
library facilities. The fee mounts established in this Resolution pursuant to the requirements of
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code are based on the DIF Study.
E. The purpose of the public facilities development impact fee will be to assist in
providing street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities in
an amount not greater than that required to meet the estimated demand created by residential and
non-residential development constructed in the City through buildout.
F. The public facilities development impact fee will be used to finance a portion the
public facilities listed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan.
G. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for a public facilities development
impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because
the construction of these development projects creates a demand for street system, park and
recreation, corporate, fire protection, and library facilities to serve the needs of the residents and
occupants of these development projects. Such facilities are necessary to facilitate ingress to and
egress from each development project, to provide necessary amenities to the residents and
occupants of each development project, and to protect the structures constructed as part of each
development project.
H. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the public facilities development
impact fee and the construction of residential and non-residential development projects because,
as a result of the fees' use as described in subsection F, residents and occupants of such
development projects will be served by the street system, park and recreation, corporate, fire
protection, and library facilities that will be financed by the fees.
I. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the public facilities
development impact fee and the portion of the total cost of street system, park and recreation,
corporate, fire protection, and library facilities attributed to each development project because the
amount of the public facilities development impact fee was carefully calculated so that the
estimated share of the total cost of the facilities assessed to a development project would equal the
estimated share of the total demand for the facilities generated by that development project. The
general methodology for apportioning the total cost of facilities, and the method for calculating
the portion of the total cost of facilities attributed to each development project is described in the
DIF Study, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4. Amount of the l~blic Facilities Development lnlpact Fee. The public
facilities development impact fee is hereby established and imposed in the amounts set forth in
R¢sos\97-94 2
Exhibit A to this Resolution, subject to modification as provided in Sections 5. and 6. of this
Resolution.
Section 5. A. tomatic Adj..qtments in Amo, nt of Fees for Development.
Commencing on January 1, 1998, the fees as established and imposed by this Resolution shall be
adjusted on January 1 of each year based upon the Dodge Building Cost Index (the "BCI") for the
Los Angeles Metropolitan Area (BCI) unless the fees are otherwise adjusted as part of an update
of the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The Director of Finance shall compute the percentage
difference between the BCI on July 1 of each year and the BCI for the previous July 1. The
Director of Finance shall then adjust by such percentage the fees established and imposed by this
Resolution. The adjusted amounts shall be rounded to the nearest dollar, and shall be submitted
to the City Council for consideration at a public hearing. Upon adoption by the City Council, the
adjusted amounts shall become effective on the following January 1. These amounts shall
constitute the fees authorized by Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and established
and imposed by this Resolution. Should the BCI be revised or discontinued, the Director of
Finance shall use the revised index or a comparable index, as approved by the City Council, for
determining fluctuations in the cost of development.
Section 6. A-tomatic Adjustments in Amo, nt of Fees for Non-Residential
Development. Commencing on July 1, 1998, and on each succeeding July 1 until July 1, 2003,
the fees as established and imposed by this Resolution for non-residential development shall be
increased in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit B to this Resolution. The dollar
amounts of the fees described in Exhibit B. were calculated on the Base Fee described therein and
illustrate how the fees will change each fiscal year. The actual fees for succeeding fiscal years
shall be calculated using the adjusted percentages of the Base Fee for each year as described in
Exhibit B. and shall be applied to the dollar amount of the fees as may have been adjusted by
Section 5. of this Resolution. The adjusted amounts shall be presented to the City Council for
review at a public hearing. The adjusted amounts shall constitute the fees authorized by
Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and were established and imposed by Resolution
97-45.
Section 7. Effective Date. The fees established pursuant to Resolution 97-45 became
effective on July 26, 1997 which date was 60 days following the adoption of Ordinance No. 97-
09.
Section 8. Amendment of Resolution 97-45. This Resolution hereby amends
Resolution 97-45 to the extent its terms differ from those of Resolution 97-45, but is restated in
full for the convenience of the public. This Resolution does not repeal or supersede Resolution
9745 except as slx~fically provided herein. This Resolution does not impose any new fees nor
amend the fees existing under Resolution 97-45, but merely clarifies certain provisions of
Resolution 9745, particularly the findings regarding the purposes of development impact fees and
the use of illustrative dollar amounts on Exhibit B. This Resolution is declaratory of existing law.
R¢sos\97-94 3
~%ction 9. ~verabi!ity. ff any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion
of this Resolution is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of a court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of
the Resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Resolution, and
each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that
any one of more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions be declared invalid
or unconstitutional.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 12th day of August, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATrEST:
J n~. Greek, CMC/~~
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 97-94 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on this 12th day of August, 1997, by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
City Clerk
R¢so8\97-94 4
EXHIBIT A
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
Component
Type of I and Useu
Amount of Fee Per Uni~
Street System
Improvements
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$511
$729
$0.682
$2.099
$1.049
$0.498
Traffic Signals and
Traffic Control
Systems
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$77
$109
$0.103
$0.316
$0.158
$0.075
Corporate Facilities
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$118
$222
$0.035
$0.088
$0.049
$0.029
Fire Protection
Facilities
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$42
$55
$0.010
$0.017
$0.014
$0.012
Park and Recreation
Improvements
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$1,209
$1,611
$0
$0
$0
$0
/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula
General Plan.
/ Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
Rcao~\97-94 5
Component
Libraries
Type of l~and Usea~
Residential (Attached)
Residential (Detached)
Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
Amount of Fee Per Unit4~
$156
$208
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAI, DEVELOPMENT Residential (Attached)
IMPACT FEE PER Residential (Detached)
UNI~/ Office
Retail Commercial
Service Commercial
Business Park/Industrial
$2,113
$2,934
$0.830
$2.520
$1.270
$0.614
/ Land use is determined based on the categories in the Land Use Element of the Temecula
General Plan.
/ Fees for residential development are calculated per dwelling unit. Fees for non-residential
development are calculated per square foot of gross building area.
Re~os\97-94 6
EXHIBIT B
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
FOR RESIDENTIAL AND NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
STREET SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE*
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
729 729 729 729 729 729 729
511 511 511 511 511 511 511
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 729
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 511
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 1.137
RETAIL COMM 3.498
SERVICE COMM 1.749
BUS PARK/IND 0.830
2004/05
729
511
0.682 0.796 0.910 1.023 1.137 1.251 1.364 0.887
2.099 2.449 2.798 3.148 3.498 3.848 4.198 2.728
1.049 1.224 1.399 1.574 1.749 1.924 2.099 1.364
0.498 0.58l 0.664 0.747 0.830 0.913 0.996 0.647
1999/00 2000/0 l 2001/02
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99
2002/03
109
77
0.188
0.580
0.289
0.138
2003/04
109
77
0.205
0.632
0.316
0.150
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 109 109 109 109 109 109
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 77 77 77 77 77 77
"3N-RESIDENTIAL
irFICE 0.171 0.103 0.120 0.137 0.154 0.171
2TAIL COMM 0.527 0.316 0.369 0.422 0.474 0.527
SERVICE COMM 0.263 0.158 0.184 0.210 0.237 0.263
BUS PARK/IND 0.125 0.075 0.088 0.100 0.113 0.125
2004/05
109
77
0.134
0.411
0.205
0.098
CORPORATE FACILITIES
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01
2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
222 222 222 222 222
118 118 118 118 118
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 222 222 222
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 118 118 118
2004/05
222
118
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.059 0.035 0.041 0.047 0.053 0.059 0.065 0.071 0.046
RETAIL COMM 0.147 0.088 0.103 0.118 0.132 0.147 0.162 0.176 0.I 15
SERVICE COMM 0.082 0.049 0.057 0.066 0.074 0.082 0.090 0.098 0.064
BUS PARK/IND 0.049 0.029 0.034 0.039 0.044'- 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.038
* Base fee is 60% of the maximum fee calculated in the Development Impact Fee Study conducted
hv David M. Gr!(fith & ,4ssociates, Inc.
r:\kuhnsa\difikarel 1 .wb2\sphere 04-Aug-97
FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES
BASE
FEE*
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 55
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 42
1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/0l 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04
55 55 55 55 55 55 55
42 42 42 42 42 42 42
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.017 0.010
RETAIL COMM 0.028 0.017
SERVICE COMM 0.023 0.014
BUS PARK/IND 0.020 0.012
2004/05
55
42
0.012 0.014 0.015 0.017 0.019 0.020 0.013
0.020 0.022 0.025 0.028 0.031 0.034 0.022
0.016 0.018 0.021 0.023 0.025 0.028 0.018
0.014 0.016 0.018 0.020 0.022 0.024 0.016
PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENTS
BASE
FEE* 1997/98
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED 1,611 1,611
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED 1,209 1,209
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000
qERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000
LJS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000
1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05
1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611 1,611
1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209 1,209
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
LIBRARIES
BASE
FEE* 1997/98 1998/99 1999~0 2000/01 2001/02 2002~3 2003/04
208 208 208 208 208 208 208 208
156 156 156 156 156 156 156 156
RESIDENTIAL DETACHED
RESIDENTIAL ATTACHED
2004/05
208
156
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
RETAIL COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
SERVICE COMM 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BUS PARK/IND 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
* Base fee is 60% of the maximum/be calculated in the Developtnent Impact Fee Study conductbd
by David M Griffith & Associates, Inc.
r:\kuhnsa\difikare11.wb2\sphere 04-Aug-97