Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSupplementalGeotechInvestigation(May19,1998) I ~ I I I 'I I I I -c- I .- I I I I I I , I - I I , I o Plinle<l on Recycled Pape, Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Tracts 24182-1 and-2 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Prepared for: Newland Associates, Inc. 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, CA 92591 Converse Project No. 96-81-420-06 May19,1998 10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, California 92374 Telephone: (909) 796-0544 . Facsimile: (909) 79E)..7675 . e.mail: ccieconv@aol.com \ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Converse Consultants Over 50 Years of De.dication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences May 19, 1998 Mr. Dean Meyer, R.C.E. Director of Engineering Newland Associates, Inc. 27393 Ynez Road, Suite 253 Temecula, CA 92591 Subject: SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Tracts 24182-1 and -2 Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community Temecula, California Converse Project No. 98-81-420-08 Dear Mr. Meyer: Enclosed is the supplemental geotechnical investigation report prepared by Converse for Tracts 24182-1 and -2, located in the city of Temecula, California. The purpose of this supplemental investigation was to review proposed rough grading plans for the subject tracts, and to evaluate subsurface conditions and provide geotechnical grading recommendations for Lot Nos. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1. This report was prepared in accordance with our proposal dated April 21, 1998. Based on our review, the proposed grading plans for the subject tracts are in substantial conformance with the recommendations of the project geotechnical report dated April 26, 1996, except for Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1. The Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1 are suitable, from a geotechnical point of view, for the proposed residential development provided the findings and conclusions presented in this report are considered in the grading, design and construction. Converse may be required to augment or modify the recommendations for these lots presented herein, based on observation of the field conditions during grading. The design recommendations presented in this report and in the report dated April 26, 1996 are for preliminary design only. An additional geotechnical report should be prepared at the completion of grading to provide final design recommendations. OPlin~on ReC1cled Pape, 10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, California 92374 Telephone: (909) 796-0544 . Facsimile: (909) 796-7675 . e-mail: ccieconv@aol.com -z.. I I I I I ';;v I I I I, I! It I. I' I! I; I 11 II I] We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to Newland Associates. If you have any questions, please feel to contact the undersigned at (909) 796-0544. CONVERSE CONSULTANTS vIE..e - fL "1 Y; s,..... Kl-_ Hashmi S. E. Quazi, Ph.D., P. E. Senior Vice President/Principal Engineer Dist.: 2/Addressee MSI/HSQ/MOC/bac 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CCI ENTlO FFICEIJ08FI LE\NEWLANO\96.420\96.420-6. SGIR ii ':? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION This report has been prepared by the staff of Converse Consultants under the professional supervision of the registered engineers and the certified engineering geologist whose seals and signatures appear hereon. The findings, recommendations and professional opinions presented in this report were prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional geological and engineering practice at this time in Southern California. There is no other warranty, either express or implied. Jl.J!. - I:.. "I"{; ~ ~- Mohammed S. Islam, Ph.D., P.E Senior Project Engineer fVl.:JJOtU Michael O. Cook, C.E.G. 1716 Project Geologist 93-81.420-08 Converse Consultants ICCI ENTIOFFICE\JO BFILEINEWLAND\9 6-42019 6-420-6. SG IR iii l>t. 1 I I I I I I I I. Il Ii I I: I' I, I, I I I I T ABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1 2.0 BACKGROUND...... .......................... ......................................................2 3.0 PLAN REVIEW ....................................................................................... 2 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK...................................................................................3 4.1 REVIEW EXISTING REPORTS/PLANS AND PROPOSED ROUGH GRADING PLANS............ 3 4.2 FIELD EXPLORATION ................ ............................................ ..... ................ 3 4.3 LABORATORY TESTING ...................... ..................... ..... ............................. 4 4.4 REPORT PREPARATION ................ ................... ................... ..... ..... .............. 4 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS .................................................................................4 5.1 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS........................................................................ 4 5.2 GROUNDWATER ........ ........ .............................. ......... ......... ....... ..... ..........5 5.3 EXCAVATABILlTY ............ ........ ......... ................ ......... ............... ..... .......... 6 5.4 COLLAPSE/EXPANSION POTENTIAL ......... ..................... ........ ..... .................... 6 5.5 SLOPE STABILITY .................................................................................... 6 5.6 SUBSURFACE VARIATIONS ......................................................................... 7 6.0 GRADING/EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS .........................................7 6.1 GENERAL ................................. ....... ............... ......... .... ..... .......... ........... 7 6.2 OVEREXCAVATION/REMOVAL.................. ...... ..............................................8 6.3 PERMANENT SLOPES ..................... ....... ........... ........ ........ ...... .............. ..... 9 7.0 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................10 8.0 CLOSURE ............................................................................................11 REFERENCES................. ....................... ...... .......................... ....................... 12 93-81 -420.08 Converse Consultants \CCIENTlOFFICEIJ 0 BFILE\NEWLAN DI96-420\96-420-6. SGIR iv ~ I I I I I I I I: I I j I I I I I ~, I I I I APPENDICES APPENDIX A ............................................................................... Field Exploration APPENDIX B................................................................ Laboratory Testing Program APPENDIX C...................................................................... Slope Stability Analysis ILLUSTRATIONS Figures Figure No. ..................................................................................... Following page Figure No.1, Site Location Map.......................................................................... 1 Figures No.2 through 6, Geologic Cross Section ..................................................4 Figure No.7, Fill Over Natural Slopes .................................................................. 9 Figure No.8, Typical Fill Over Cut ...................................................................... 9 Drawings Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map (Sheet 1 and 2) ..... in map pocket 93-81-420.08 Converse Consultants ICCI ENTlOFFICEIJO BFILEINEWLAN 0\96-420\96-420-6. SG I R v <,. I I I I I I I I Ii I II .. I' I I; I; I I I; I, 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of a supplemental geotechnical investigation performed by Converse for Tracts 24182-1 and -2 in the city of Temecula, California. The purposes of this supplemental investigation was to review proposed grading plans for the subject tracts, determine the nature and engineering properties of the subsurface soils and to provide grading recommendations for Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1. The location of the subject project is shown in Figure No.1, Site Location Map. The subject tracts are bounded on the north by De Portola Road and Campanula Way, on the west by Campanula Way and Tract 24182-3, on the south by Highway 79, and on the east by Tract 24182-5. In preparing this report, we have utilized the following reports and grading plans as references: · Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Eastern and Southern Portion of the "Meadows", Approximately 800-acre site, City of Temecula, California, Dated April 26, 1996, prepared by Converse for Newland Associates, Converse Project No. 96-81-420-01. · As Built Geology and Compaction Report of Rough Grading, Tracts 24182 through 24186 and 24188-1, Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, Temecula, California, Dated August 20, 1997, Prepared by Converse for Newland Associates, Converse Project No. 96-81-420-03. . Rough Grading Plan, Tract 24182-1, -2, -3, & -4, Sheets 5 through 7, Dated March 6, 1998, Prepared by Keith International, Inc., Moreno Valley, California. The Sheets No.6 and 7 of the above-referenced proposed rough grading plan are included as Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map (Sheets 1 and 2), in the map pockets at the end of this report. This report is written for the proposed residential project described herein and is intended for use solely by Newland Associates and its designated agents. It may not contain sufficient information for use by others andlor for other purposes. It should not be used as a bidding document but may be made available to the potential contractors for information on factual data only. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CCIENTlOFFIC E\JO BFILE\NEWLANO\9 6-420\96-420-6. SG I R 1 "'\ I '. I I I I I I I I I I I~ .c I I~ . " Ii ~ . > Ii I I TO RIVERSIDE TO CORONA ~ S6 ~ ~ -< ('"\ z ,." Ul City of TO SAN DIEGO ~'?' ~ l.!>-RGARI?, c5f ~ c1 \J' CD C ::j ,." ::0 21 ,." r- o ~ PROJECT SITE SITE LOCATION MAP SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Tract 24182-1 and -2 Temecula, California @ Converse Consultants :2.?- VI PrOtect No 96-81-420-08 Figure No. 1 .~ ?I>-U8A RD. ~ ll' ?OR101.}. DE. 79 r\IGr\','II>-Y '\ ~\A\ ) VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE . . I . I I I I I; - I I I .i I I I I For bidding purposes, the contractors should be responsible for making their own interpretation of the data contained in this report. 2.0 BACKGROUND The subject tracts are located within the Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community in the city of Temecula, California. These tracts, except Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1, had been mass graded in accordance with the above-referenced project geotechnical report dated April 26, 1996 and the following mass grading plans: · Tracts No. 24181 & 24183, Mass Grading Plan, Sheets 1 through 3, dated August 13, 1997, prepared by Keith International, Inc., Moreno Valley, California. Mass grading was performed by ACI, Corona, California, during the period from October 1996 through June 1997. Converse performed full-time observation and field density testing during mass grading. Results of field observation and field density testing were presented in the above-referenced as-built geology and compaction of report of rough grading dated August 20, 1997. At this time, the subject tracts are proposed to be rough graded in accordance with the above-referenced rough grading plans dated March 6, 1998. The purpose of this investigation was to review these proposed rough grading plans and to provide supplemental site grading recommendations. 3.0 PLAN REVIEW Converse performed a review of the proposed rough grading plans for the Tracts 24182-1 and -2. Based on our review, grading for Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1 will extend beyond the limits of the previously completed mass grading as shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. For the remaining lots, including the park area, additional site grading will include cut and fill on the order of four (4) feet and nine (9) feet, respectively. Additional site grading associated with Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1 will involve, exclusive of any remedial overexcavation, cut and fill on the order of 25 feet and nine (9) feet respectively. Grading for each of these lots will also include a rear yard cut or fill slope. These slopes are proposed to be constructed at a gradient of 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants ICCI ENTIOFFICEIJO BFILEINEWLAND\96.420196-420-6. SGIR 2 I a.. I I I . I I I I I. IL Ii I I I I, I~ II I: I 2:1 (Horizontal to Vertical). The maximum height of the proposed cut and fill slopes will be on the order of 40 and 1 0 feet, respectively. A supplemental geotechnical investigation was performed to evaluate the subsurface conditions and to provide general site grading recommendations for Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1. For subsurface conditions for the remaining lots of the subject tracts prior to grading, see the above-referenced project geotechnical report dated April 26, 1996. The scope of the following sections of this report unless noted otherwise, is limited to Lot Nos. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1 only. 4.0 SCOPE OF WORK The scope of our present investigation included a review of existing information, site reconnaissance, review of the proposed rough grading plans, field exploration, soil sampling, laboratory testing, engineering and geologic analyses, and preparation of this report. The scope of work included the following tasks: 4.1 Review Existing Reports/Plans and Proposed Rough Grading Plans As part of this supplemental investigation, we have reviewed available pertinent geologic and geotechnical reports and maps included in the References, and the proposed rough grading plans. 4.2 Field Exploration Our field exploration included site reconnaissance, geologic mapping and excavation of five (5) exploratory test pits. The test pits were excavated using a backhoe equipped with a 24-inch wide bucket. The depth of the exploratory test pits ranged from six (6) to eight (8) feet below existing ground surface. The approximate locations of the test pits are shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. A Converse engineering geologist visually logged the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory test. Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples of the subsurface materials were obtained from the test pits at frequent intervals for the purpose of laboratory testing. A more detailed description of the field exploration procedures and logs of test pits are presented in Appendix A, Field Exploration. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CCI ENTlOFFIC E\J OBFILE\NEWLAND\9 6.420\96.420-6. SGIR 3 \0 I I I I I I I I '. I I' If I' I I I I r Il Il 4.3 Laboratory Testing Laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples. The tests included moisture-density determinations, compaction, direct shear and consolidation tests. Descriptions and results of the laboratory tests are presented in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing Program. 4.4 Report Preparation Data obtained from the field exploration and laboratory testing program were evaluated. Geotechnical analyses were performed and this report was prepared to present results of the grading plan review, field exploration, findings, conclusions and recommendations. 5.0 SITE CONDITIONS 5.1 Subsurface Conditions The subject lots are located on a hillside. The original ground surface elevation ranges from approximately 1,004 feet at the southwest corner of Lot No. 24 to approximately 1,070 feet at the top of the hill. The existing ground surface conditions within the subject lots comprise previously mass graded areas and undeveloped hillside area. The approximate limits of the mass grading around the hill is shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. The undeveloped hillside areas are covered with moderate to heavy growth of vegetation. An approximately 40-foot by 180-foot wide abandoned concrete slab is buried at the location of the proposed Lots No. 28 through 31 of Tract 24182-1. The mass graded areas are covered with light vegetation. Existing topographic and geologic conditions, and proposed ground surface along the rear yard slopes are depicted in Figures No.2 through 6, Geologic Cross Section. The frqnt yard areas of the majority of these lots had been mass graded as shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Locations Maps. Compacted fills (map symbol Af) underlie the existing fill areas over Pauba Formation Bedrock (map symbol Qp). The Pauba Formation bedrock is comprised of mainly weathered, soil-like sandstone and siltstone with some claystone. The depth of remedial overexcavation within the limits of these lots prior to placing any fill during mass grading ranged from about five (5) to 10 feet below existing ground surface. 93-81.420-08 Converse Consultants IC CI ENTlO FFI C EIJ08FIlEINEWlANDI96-420\9 6.420.6. SG IR 4 \\ ~ il , I ., J 1 , 1 I I I I ;1 .. I '1 Elevation (feet) - - - - - - - - - - 0 '" ... co '" 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~OXIMATE UMIT OF MASS GRADE FILL I I I I I I z """ """ m ! CIJ C"l > r :J:m II .. < - . " ... q ~ . ClJm ~~ 'lICIJ >::l C"lZ mC "c :D:D 00 "'c r=z mo < I o ::j C"l \ :J: ~ \ )1 \ \ t:) "0 t:)1 "0 . I . r ,--1. ~ ~:ll I \ :DO "''' I >0 C"lCIJ mm ,,0 :Dc O:D :!l0 fii~ o '" mc Om !2z zm C:D ~~ mO CIJ 0> c" :D" -:D Zo Cx ;:3: "> en.... enm "'r =- ..~ CI::j i!CIl "'0 ." :D m ~ 51 > r ~~ (") -1-1'" o mOle .. 3o"1l ~ CD-""C < C"l/\)r (I) 5.oI>-m ... o>~:;:: - CIl m ~ OI\)Z G) .., 0>1-1_ =.....:> LAi (") Co> r 0 o 3 ::lc.Gl r- :l i>> m 0 1Il I 0 '"' C I\) -I \.lJ - m _ .. 0 '"' III :I: \ J a ~(") 1Il ~ :x:l r 0 Z C/) iii C/) ~ C/) G5 m > (") :j -l o _ Z 0 :z ~ I ~ . " ~ !! z " co Cl I CIl ~ I 01>- /\) o I o CIl ." ! z " N 1,\ [I 11 II II 'I I ~I rI L tl II I I I I I I I I 'I Elevation (feet - - - - - - - - - - ON. C CD o 0 0 0 0 ~ TER~O STREET ..... - c:c r- o .... '" .... APPROXIMATE UMIT OF MASS GRADE-FILL z (J)Co) "Ul ~m ;T : ~ < . " ... q " o F c < 2: ;:: '\ (J)~ c~ I '" 0 . ~(3 I ~~ .0 ",e '0 "'Gl 0", ::!!O I r-c mz e Olr~. if ~~ r-(J) .~ Nm \......... ~e ";11\ ~ \\ ~ ~ '" o (J) (J) ijj r- m ... ;= r- e> $:g -'" Zo Glx ;::f >> ...... "m Gle; "';:: >- e.... -(J) Zo Gl... :c m ;:: o < > r- mm cx "'- ...(J) >;:j "z mGl "'Gl "'''' 00 ~?i me r " o F c < 2: ;:: .0 '0 '" >mGl ",em ",ez >zm ~G)~ Z"'r- -tIN e>m -ffic "'(J) ~~ (") -i-iCll "'--C o "'-0 :;, ~g.-o < "I\)r CD !:..;.~ .., "'~ 'A - <Xl m '"" v. 0 I\) Z "J CD ~..!.~ m (') O'",ro o 2.5.ffio r- :;, '" 10 III I\) -i C') 5. m .... .. On III ::I: :;, Z n c;r ~ ::0 ~ 0 Z (J) rii (J) ~ (J) 15 m :l> n ::! -l o _ Z 0 Z c:c , c:c . c:c . ~ ~ " z ~ co Ol I <Xl ~ 1 .;. I\) o I o <Xl ~ ~ z ~ W 4,\ rl 11 II tl I II I I I ~I I I I I rl 1- I I 1 11 t z ... I\) m (J) o > fn :I: .. II < - . II ... q n n . Elevation (feet - - - - - - - - - - 0 II) ... Ol Ol 0 0 0 0 0 ..1- - Dl m G) \ Om Oz I:) ~~.\ I:) 'C "D,.. (") \ \ ~~ \ I 2- 0 I :xl m > x Z 0; -t l Z G) G) "D :xl :xl 0 "D 0 C :xl "D Z 0 0 0 "D (J) (J) 0 m c (J) 0 " m G) ." 0 > (J) :xl 0 -t 0 m > c "D Z Dl 0 :xl ;= 0 N (J) ." > C ;= -t :xl m 0 ." > Z 0 ." m ,.. 0 ;= "D -t ,.. " 0 '" ." - ;= m j '"""- CURB I:) 'C - TERANO ST. (St) (') -i-ien o <IliilC ... 30" .J CD - '1J <: ON' CD 5,.j>.m ... m~~ - m !!! ()~Z ~ ... D> I -i [Tl (') 3';;;~ 0 o 3::l G) t"'" :;, iij'c'm 0 en I 0 '" C N -i "J - m - .... () n III J: a ;;s; n en () ::0 ~ 0 z C/l <: C/l m en C/l :::j [Tl ~ n :::j """l o - Z 0 Z n I <"1 'l' ~ !l z ~ CD Cl I Ol ~ I .j>. N o r o Ol ." f z ~ ... 1tq\ I I I J 'I I .1 I 'I 11 ., '" ~I I I I I I I I I z~f " <~Z ".... ~Ol Om o t:) "0 0 o F ~ ~ , cnm ex JJ- ."cn >:::! oz mQ "Q JJJJ 00 :!le r-z r- me ~ ~ . APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF -I MASS GRADE FILL . - -- - PROPEFUY UNE . I . 5 I ~ . ~ I Elevation (feet) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 '" ... '" ~ 0 0 0 0 c> c" =" -JJ 20 "x ;:- >3: ",> "'.... .,m =JJ >m c3: ;;;0 .,< ~ r- f ;;j ~ SECTION E-€' I ~"1 "C) >- '"tt :0:0 -0 :0 -0" 0 Oc:O "'1] JJzO 0 -10 X en Oc/) 3: m ;:e> c >::0 -t G) rn"TI m :0 '" >;: 0 mO _ c :amen Z > '1J rn C 5!:tJ II) en zO:a c cn:!!E; ~ fnm > ... 0 ;:: m ... " JJ o ." ;= m <!~ (') ..........00 o <DOle ::::l ~ ~ ~ < "1\)0 CD s'.;.m .., m-.3: Ul - CD m . "" 01\) Z "J CD ~~;! ['T1 (') o III 0 0 o 3 "0. Gl r-' ::::l S' m 0 Ul I 0 "" c: 1\)..... "J - m_ ... 0 "" III :r \ J a ~(') Ul ~ :::l:l o 0 Z (J) rii (J) ~ (J) 15 ['T1 )> (') ::! -l o _ Z 0 2 o , o . ~ fi '" ? co Cl I CD ~ I .;. I\) o , o CD ." f '" ? <:J1 7' tTl "'z ~(Q 7,= fiim ~ <~ . " ... q t'T'! SECTION 0-0' Elevation (feet ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ii o 0 0 \ "'m~ "'x \ >- Ocn:ll ~::lo . ~zx ~ ~~i: I -., r;;~ "''"0 '" . CJJ I JJO "''"0 >0 0", . mm '"00 I JJ", OJJ :!I 0 . ~~ I 0 , I , \ ,... o .... ... ~ --I[ DE PORTOUA ROAD ~ ~ g D '0 r--..,: >I> t ~:jl , zi'l 1 "'x I O:;i: 1 ~~ 1 55c >0:; 0_ -.... z'" "'0 ." :Il ~ Q ~ ....'" OJJ 0:;0 >c "'Z ",0 '" '" I "'c >JJ 0." -> ... D ~~ I ~ '0 '"0 ~ i'l I :!! ... In I '"0 ~ I ~ ~ g ~~ (") -t-tCIJ o mOle: :J ~g,:g < oll;)r CD S.,. m .., Q)...6.S:: en . cem,,.... 011;) Z I.ll (I) ~.l:;! tTl (") CD> r 0 o 3"c.G) t"'" :J iii' m 0 ~ ri,~ ~ - m_ - 0 n III I a ~ n en 0::0 ~ 0 z (J) < (J) m ~ (J) - tTl ~ n ::! ..., o _ Z 0 2: tTl . tTl . " I z ? co C) I ce ~ I .,. II;) o I o ce ." f z ? '" "1\ il I I I I I I Ii 11 - 11 r I' I I; I I I: I] The undeveloped areas with the proposed grading limits are underlain by mainly colluvium (map symbol Qcol) and Paubla Formation Bedrock. The thickness of the colluvium soils ranges from about three (3) feet to five (5) feet at the locations of the exploratory test pits. Minor amounts of alluvium soils overlie the Pauba Formation bedrock in the southern portion of the hill. The colluvium are comprised of mainly loose silty sand with some clay and sandy silts. The Pauba Formation bedrock, to the maximum explored depth of eight (8) feet; comprised of mainly soil-like weathered sandstone and siltstone. The backyard areas of Lots No. 16, 17,41 and 42 of Tract 24182-1 are underlain by artificial fills (map symbol Ad associated with De Portola Road construction. These fills are considered to be undocumented. Results of relevant laboratory tests performed on representative samples of site soils are include in Appendix B, Laboratory Testing. A typical gradation of the site soils is shown in Figure No. B-1, Grain Size Distribution. Results of a laboratory maximum density test are shown in Figure No. B-2, Compaction Test. The maximum dry density and the optimum moisture content of the sample tested was found to be 125.4 pounds per cubic-foot (pcf) and 9.0 percent, respectively. Results of direct shear tests on relatively undisturbed samples of the site soils are presented in Figures No. B-3 through B-7, Direct Shear Tests. Based on these results, the effective cohesion and friction angle of the earth materials at the site range from 0.0 to 176 pounds per square-foot and 23.3 to 36.6 degrees, respectively. Results of a consolidation test are shown in Figure B-8, Consolidation Test. Based on the test results, the coefficient of consolidation (Cc) of the soil-like sandstone materials is about 0.12. 5.2 Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory test pits. No perched water seepage conditions were encountered within the test pits. However, perched water may be encountered during grading around the hill, which may result in seepage. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants ICCI ENTlO F FI CEIJOBFI LEINEWLANDI9 6-42019 6.420.6. SG IR 5 \"\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 5.3 Excavatability The subject lots are underlain by soil-like Pauba Formation Bedrock. Based on our field exploration and previous experience, subsurface materials to the anticipated depth of excavation should be excavatable with conventional heavy-duty earth moving equipment. 5.4 Col/apse/Expansion Potential The colluvial soils overlying the bedrock are generally loose and porous. These materials are susceptible to significant collapse under load. The underlying bedrock materials are slightly susceptible to collapse upon wetting. Based on previous site experience, the expansion potential of the soil-like Pauba Formation bedrock may range from very low to high depending on the fine content. The expansion potential of the building pad soils should be evaluated at the completion of rough grading. 5.5 Slope Stability Based on the proposed grading plan included as Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map, site grading will involve cut and fill slopes on the order of 40 feet and 10 feet, respectively. These slopes are proposed to be graded at a gradient of 2:1 (horizontal:vertical). Typical cross-sections of the slopes are shown in Figures NO.2 through 6, Geologic Cross Section. The locations of these cross-sections are shown on Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. Depicted in these figures are existing ground surface, proposed final grade and the generalized geology at the location of each cross section. Based on our field exploration and review of the rough grading plans, the proposed cut slopes will comprise mainly Pauba Formation bedrock overlain by a thin layer of colluvium at some locations. The observed generalized bedding orientation is generally favorable to the orientation of the proposed cut slopes. A detailed static and pseudo-static slope stability analysis was performed to evaluate the stability of the proposed cut and fill slopes at the most critical sections shown on Figure No.3, Geologic Cross Section (B-B') and Figure No.6, Geologic Cross Section (E-E'). Results of the slope stability analysis are included in Appendix C, Slope Stability Analysis. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CC I ENTlOFFICE\JOBFI LE\N EWLANO\9 6.420\9 6-420-6. SG I R 6 \ttJ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I : I Based on the results of this analysis, the proposed cut slopes should have a static and pseudo-static factor of safety of about 2.0 and 1048, respectively against gross stability. The corresponding factors of safety for the proposed fill slopes are about 2.0 and 1046, respectively. The gradient of the natural slopes above the proposed cut slopes ranges from about 12: 1 (Horizontal to Vertical) to 3: 1. Based on additional static slope stability analysis, the surficial stability of these slopes should be at least 1 A. Based on the proposed grading plans, site grading may result in partial or no removal of unsuitable colluvial soils from the cut slope faces at some locations. The static factor of safety of these colluvial soils on a 2: 1 slope is about 1.1 against surficial failures. Based on the above results, the proposed cut and fill slopes are grossly stable. The natural slopes above the proposed cut slopes are also stable against surficial failures. Natural colluvial soils on a 2:1 cut slopes are marginally stable against surficial failures. 5.6 Subsurface Variations Some variations in the continuity and nature of subsurface conditions within the project site should be anticipated. Because of the uncertainties involved in the nature and depositional characteristics of the earth material, care should be exercised in interpolating or extrapolating subsurface conditions between or beyond the test pit locations. 6.0 GRADING/EARTHWORK RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 General This section contains our general recommendations regarding earthwork and site grading for the subject lots. These recommendations are based on the results of our field exploration, laboratory testing and data evaluation as presented in the preceding sections. These recommendations may need to be augmented or modified based on field observation during grading. . 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants ICC I ENTlOFFICEIJOBFILEIN EWLAND\9 6-420196.420-6. SGIR 7 \'\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Prior to the start of any earthwork, the areas to be graded areas should be cleared of all vegetation and debris including .the abandoned concrete foundation at the location of the Lots No. 28 through 31. Organic and non-organic materials resulting from the clearing and grubbing operations should be hauled off the site. All additional fills placed over existing slopes should be keyed into firm and unyielding materials at the toe. These fills should also be benched into the firm native and/or existing fill materials. The final bottom surfaces of all excavations should be observed and approved by the project geotechnical consultant prior to placing any fill and/or structures. All fills should be placed on competent native materials as determined by a Converse representative and in accordance with the recommendations presented in this and the above-referenced report dated April 26, 1996. 6.2 Overexcavation/Removal Earthwork in accordance with the proposed rough grading plan will result in cut, fill and cut/fill transition conditions within the subject lots. The following overexcavation/removal recommendations are provided as general guidelines for removal of the surficial loose earth material materials from the grading areas. Actual overexcavation/removal should be based on field observation during grading. All overexcavation should be backfilled with compacted native soils. At least the upper six (6) inches of all excavated surfaces should be scarified and moisture conditioned, if necessary, and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as per ASTM Standard D1557-91 prior to placing any fill and/or structures. The cut Lots No. 18 and 29 through 31 should be overexcavated to a depth of at least five (5) feet below existino oround surface. At least the upper 18 to 24 inches of the fill Lots No. 24, 25 and 42 located within the previously mass graded areas be overexcavated and recompacted prior to placing any additional fill. The cut/fill transition lots should be overexcavated to provide at least 2B (feet), where B is width of footing in feet, below the footing foundations. Assuming a 24 inch-wide footing foundation to be founded to a depth of 18 inches below final grade, we recommend that the cut/fill transition lots be overexcavated to a depth of at least five (5) feet be/ow proposed final orade. 93.81 -420-08 Converse Consultants ICC I ENTIOFFICEIJOBFILEINEWLANDI9 6.420196-420.6. SG IR 8 7,P I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I' I 11 I I I I Existing fill along the limits of the mass grading (see Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map) around the hill area should be overexcavated to remove unsuitable materials from the contact zones of the existing fill and native materials. All additional fills placed over the contact areas should be keyed and benched into competent existing fill andlor native materials as shown in Figure No.7, Fill Over Natural Slopes andlor Figure No.8, Typical Fill Over Cut Slope. The above recommendations are applicable for Lots No. 17 through 42 of Tract 24182-1: For the remainder of the Tract 24182-1 and -2, site grading should include removal and recompaction of the upper 18 to 24 inches of existing fills before placing any additional fills. Where existing fill soils will be cut to reach the proposed final grade, the subgrade soils should be overexcavated andlor scarified, and compacted to a depth of at least 24 inches below existing grade or 12 inches below proposed final grade, whichever is deeper. Removal deeper than that documented in this report may be required based on field observation during grading. Removal areas will include existing roadway fills during grading of the lots adjacent to De Portola Road, 6.3 Permanent Slopes Site grading will include cut and fill slopes on the order of 40 feet and 10 feet. These slopes are proposed to be constructed at a slope of 2: 1 (horizontal :vertical). The fill slopes at the backyard of Lots No. 17, 41 and 42 will include placement of additional fill over existing roadway fills. Earthwork will also include placement of compacted fill over a steep segment of the existing natural slope at the south side of the hill. A stabilization fill with a backdrain is recommended along this segment of the slope. The recommended limits of the stabilization fill and the subdrain location is shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. Two cross-sections depicting detailed geometry of the recommended stabilization fill are shown in Figure No.3, Geologic Cross Section (B-B') and Figure No.4, Geologic Cross Section (C-C'). The subdrain should be comprised of a six (6)-inch diameter perforated pipe encased in a minimum of nine (9) cubic feet per feet of filter materials as recommended in the above-referenced project geotechnical report dated April 26, 1996. The filter materials should be wrapped by a Mirafi 140 or equivalent filter fabric. The perforated drain pipe should be placed at gradient of at least 1.0 percent. 93.81.420.08 Converse Consultants \CCIENT\OFFICEIJO SFI LE\NEWLAN 0\96-420\96.420.6. SGIR 9 <p. I '. I I I I I I I I I I I'~ .c I Ig . " I~ . > 11 I I . . - . .' .' ...... . . .. : ..:: :~OMPAC:ra 'F~" :". -. \ ... . ~.. "-'.: ':=':,:,,::.:' ~;;."-:.'.~~::::i.'<'. . .., ....'S--. _._,...:.:.;,r.;-:\'I(q/ PROJECTED PLANE .' .~. .:.:.':>:..: 0c:.~-;':;~': ~~:-. < -:"'J,\! 1 to 1 ma;r;imumfrom .: ......;...-?:.~:::::.- . _l':.:'_ apt~:~SI~~ \ '.: ~'-:-:-::::'; ;?"'2:~': . _.':-:~"'2~r-~~>.. t ,- Ty~Jc..aJ NATURAL .->:=:" .'. ;,,::.;.-. P' -r GROUND ".: . . ~;:::..:..:'<~."::> L I LSENCO HElGHT .-.. I /. ........... . . """-' - '/ .... . ..' . .' BENCO - I~ '<". : 2'Io _IH..:....., I ~-'.f....... _ =_ :::. i l~\ .... ~~J.q~ Jr::EY DE?TH - 15' 1oI1H.. I LOWEST BENCH J exay) REMOVE 'UNSUIT ABLE MA TE"JAL FILL OVER NATURAL SLOPE SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Tract 24182-1 and -2 Temecula, California @ Converse Consultants PrOJeCl No 96- 81-420-08 Figure No 7tv I . I I I I I I I~ 11 I I li~ .c I; I'g ;; ~ lo:g -"- '0 ~- ~ . > (-~ ."- ~c( Ij Ij CUI/FiLL CONTACT SHOWN ON GiUOING Pv.N . .' CUT.'F!LL CONT).CT TO 3E SHOWN ON - AS-3Ullr wlJ?SC:iT lJ).1E;:IlAL , d.:;;:;r,.-:::://_Y_:/,....c:;:--U:: ",'cd O"'~""" \ COI.l?:TE.'/T lU 1E"IAl CUT SLOP: TO BE CONSTRUw~ PRIOR TO ?........CEllE~j; OF FiL!.. (F:f'/IAY IN COI.l?:TE:iT IIAT- E"IAL IIINllJUlJ WIDTH OF 15 FE:' OR .LS RECOlJI.lE~OE~ 3Y rrlE Sail E~G;NEER wlJ?Aw~ ;:IU . . . ':"-;-"7 . .\. - --- . ". .~. . . ~ , . '. . 0 .......\i.."v-L - . . ~ '. ~llS\J\iI-~I.: . . .- '. \\:.",crk ~-- ,=-/_Z 1 VARIABlE. _'0 _ . . . . (. . . _-. . .' .. IIIN '. . . . . . /A'/_ _/. % y/ I.IINII.IUI.I HEIGrIT OF 3E~C:-iES 15 ( FE::r OR AS RE':OlJ- I.lENOD 3Y irlE Sail E%i- HE::" t LIIINllJUJ.l r TILi g;.cx OR Z~ SLOPE (WliIOlEYB !oS Gii, IE:I) TYPICAL FILL ABOVE CUT SLOPE SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Tract 24182-1 and -2 Temecula, California @ Converse Consultants Project No. 96-81-420-08 Figure No. 8-zi? I . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Unsuitable colluvial soils from the faces of the cut slopes may be required to be removed and replaced as compacted fill. Such replacement or any other fill placed over cut or natural slopes should be keyed into the competent native materials as shown in Figure No.7, Fill Over Natural Slopes andlor Figure No.8, Typical Fill Over Cut Slope. The buildings should be setback from the slope in accordance with Figure No. 29-1 of the Uniform Building Code (1994). 7.0 CONCLUSIONS The following conclusions are based on our review of the proposed grading plans, field exploration, laboratory testing, data analysislinterpretation, and our previous experience with similar projects and professional judgement. . The proposed grading plans, except for Lots No. 17 through 42, are prepared in substantial compliance with the recommendations provided in our report dated April 26,1996. · The Lots No. 17 through 42 are suitable for the proposed development, from a geotechnical point of view, provided recommendations provided in this supplemental geotechnical investigation report and the report dated April 26, 1996 are incorporated into grading, design and construction. · Remedial overexcavation to a depth of above five (5) feet is required for the cut lots and cutlfill transition lots to either remove unsuitable surficial soils or reduce significant differential settlement. Actual removal depth should be based on field observation during grading. . Site grading will result in significant variations in the fill thickness underneath the cut/fill lots adjacent to the hills. The thickness of compacted fills within a single lot adjacent to the hill will range on the order of five (5) to 25 feet. Potential damages to structures over these cutlfill lots may be reduced by strengthening structures and foundations such as by constructing post-tensioned slabs or conventional slabs with stiffened grade beams. . The proposed cut and fill slopes should be grossly stable under static as well as dynamic loading conditions. Colluvial soils on 2:1 slopes are considered to be marginally stable against shallow surficial failures. Sandstone materials, when 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants ICCI ENTIOFFICEIJ OBFILEINEWLAN DI96-420196-420-6 .SGIR 10 f,,~ I I I I I I I I f exposed at the slope face, are prone to erosion. Some surficial raveling and erosion of the slope requiring periodic maintenance should be anticipated. . All fill over natural and cut slopes should be keyed/benched into competent native materials as recommended in this report. . Based on the time elapsed since the completion of previous grading, fill thickness, consolidation characteristics of the subsurface soils and the results of the settlement monitoring, it is our opinion that the majority of the primary consolidation settlement under existing fills has occurred over the subject tracts. . Final design recommendations should be based on additional investigation of the actual soil conditions at the completion of rough grading. 8.0 CLOSURE II The site development recommendations and limitations except as modified herein, provided in the above-referenced preliminary geotechnical report dated April 26, 1996 are still applicable. These recommendations include earthwork specifications, observation and testing during grading, site drainage, slope protection and maintenance, buried utilities and structural design recommendations. I~ I' I' I I. I; I I: I] Site grading recommendations provided in this and the report dated April 26, 1996, may need to be augmented or modified based on field observation during grading. An additional geotechnical report should be prepared to provide final design recommendations based on additional studies of the actual soil conditions at the completion of grading. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CCI ENT\OFFI CEIJOBFI LE\NEWLAN0\96-420\96.420-6. SG I R 11 1fi I II I I I I I I II II II I' I: 1_: I, Il [ II IJ REFERENCES American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM), Annual Books of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08 and 04.09. Converse Consultants (1996), Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Eastern and Southern Portion of the "Meadows", Approximately 800-acre site, City of Temecula, California, Dated April 26, 1996, prepared by Converse for Newland Associates, Converse Project No. 96-81-420-01. Converse Consultants (1997), As Built Geology and Compaction Report of Rough Grading, Tracts 24182 through 24186 and 24188-1, Paseo Del Sol Master Planned Community, Temecula, California, Dated August 20, 1997, Prepared by Converse for Newland Associates, Converse Project No. 96-81-420-03. 0' Hungr Geotechnical Research, Inc. (1992), Clara, Slope Stability Analysis in Two or Three Dimensions for IBM Compatible Microcmputers, Version 2.31. International Conference of Building Officials (1994), Uniform Building Code, Whittier, California. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \C CIENT\O FFICE\JOBFILE\NEWLAN D\9 6.420\96-420-6. SGIR 12 JjP I I I 1 I I I I I~ I~ 11 I' I: I" I; I: .: iii II IJ APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION 1/" 1 I I I 1 I 1 I APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Our field investigation included a site reconnaissance of the subject tracts and a subsurface exploration program consisting of five (5) exploratory test pits within the undeveloped area adjacent to the hill. During the site reconnaissance, the surface conditions were noted and the locations of the test pits were determined. The test pits were located using existing topography and boundary features as a guide. The test pits were excavated using a backhoe equipped with a 24-inch wide bucket. Soils were continuously logged and classified in the field by visual examination in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The field descriptions have been modified where appropriate to reflect laboratory test results. II Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples of the subsurface soils were obtained at frequent intervals in the test pits. The undisturbed samples were obtained using a hand auger equipped with a Modified California Sampler (2.4-inch inside diameter, three-inch outside diameter) lined with thin ring samples. The soil was retained in brass rings (2.4 inches in diameter, one inch in height). The central portion of the sample was retained and carefully sealed in waterproof plastic containers for shipment to the laboratory. Bulk soil samples were collected in plastic bags and brought to the laboratory. Sand Cone tests were also performed at selected depths in the test pits to determine in-situ density and moisture content of site soils. Results of the sand cone tests are summarized in Table No. A-1, Summary of Field Density Test Results. . . -I iii. II If I, I" 11 II 11 IJ 93.81 -420.08 Converse Consultants ICCIENTIOFFICEIJ OBFILEINEWLANDI96-420\96-420-6. SGIR A-1 ~ 1 I I I' 1 I I I: I: IF ..~ II I, I: I; I" I~ , . 11 Ii IJ Table No. A-1, Summary of Field Density Test Results Test Pit IT est Depth Moisture (%) Dry Density (pet) , Tp.l/l ' 15.2 113.0 TP-1/4' 16.4 108.8 TP-1/6.5' 25.7 96.0 TP-2/2' 7.4 104.0 TP-2/4' 10.3 103.9 TP-2/6' 25.7 92.3 TP-3/l ' 10.5 116.9 Tp.3/3' 7.8 117.,4 Tp.3/5' 10.9 119.6 TP-4/2.5' 17.6 88.7 TP-4/l2.7 12.7 94.9 Tp.4/8' 21.7 87.7 Tp.5/2.5' 11.0 114.2 TP-5/2.5' 13.6 103.4 Tp.5/2.5 10.7 93.5 TP-5/6.0 16.9 104.5 For logs of the test pits, see Drawings No. A-1 through A-5, Logs of Test Pits. A key to soil symbols and terminology used in the boring logs is included as Drawing No. A-6, Unified Soil Classification and Key to Boring Log Symbols. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CCIENT\OFFI C EIJOBFI LE\N EWLAN 0\96-420\96-420.6. SG I R A-2 -#- I I I I I I' I I' I I 11 I'. Ii IJ I; 11 I 11 IJ Log of Test Pit No. TP- 1 Dates Drilled: 4/23/98 Logged by: MBS Checked by: 40 Ib / 12 inch MSI Equipment: Backhoe/Case 580 Driving Weight and Drop: Ground Surface Elevation(ft): 1140.0 Depth to Water(ft): None Encountered SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS , , SAMPLES I- :i< I- 0 This log is pan of the repan prepared by Converse for this project and should be 0 S ;:: read together with the repan. This summary applies only at the location of the 0 w - U LL ce I- boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other ~ ~ I I locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data CfJ I- Z ce 0.. w S ~ I- presemed is a simplification of aelUa] conditions encountered. > '" CfJ W 0.. <(t9 ..J 0 >-;;: I w ceo ce ~ ..J 0 ceu I- 0 t9..J 0 Cll Cll 2 oE- 0 CQUJNTTJM (lEol) 18 13 118 ds Silty Sand/Sandy Silt (SMJML): fine - to coarse - grained, with roots and rock clasts, moist, brown. "" " " REDRorK' Pauha Fonnation (Qp) ^ )( x " " " " " " " " " Silty Sandstone: weathered, fine - to medium - grained, with 39 13 116 ds 5 x x x " " x x " gravel and rock clasts to 5", brown. x x x x x x)( x )( x x End of test pit at 7 feet. No groundwater or seepage encountered. Trench backfilled and tamped on 4-23-98. 10 15 - I SCALE: I Inch;5 reef (H;VI SKETCH N75E _ .----..---....--F--..---- .--.-.-.-.-..........-..--.. . .--..... ........... ..-- .__1.. .......--.......-.----..-- -.- TOE OF SLOPE , I , [WEEDS I I I fOLLUVI4t-S 1[7(--- -......-- . .o..~I. -- - - -.!Q~I) . . I . . '1 . . I Qp '.\1'0,,:' - ~-----I'-- EXISTING " FILL (At) " Qp \ ....!m-------.~h~... I I - DENSITY TES~r~ DRIVE SiPLE I I ---..-------..- ------.--.-...--!----.......-..--..--.!.---------. ! I I ' ! I I i I .L @ Converse Consultants Project Name. SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONiTRACT 24182-1&2 Temecula, California I For: Newland A<:<:nri:-.tl'<: Project No. 98-81-420-08 Drawing No. A-I ?O I I I I I I I I. I I 11 I' I' I I. I I I; IJ Log of Test Pit No. TP- 2 Dates Drilled: 4/23/98 Logged by: MBS Equipment: Backhoe/Case 580 Driving Weight and Drop: Ground Surface Elevation(ft): 1130.0 Depth to Water(ft): None Encountered Checked by: 40 lb / 12 inch MSI SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS AMPLE I- "if- I- This log is part of the report prepared by Converse for lhis project and should be 0 S -;:; read together with the report. This summary applies only at the location of the 0 W - U l.L a: I- boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at Olher ~ :J Z I I locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data (J) I- a: 0- W S :J I- presemed is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. > ><: (J) W 0- <((9 -' 0 >-~ I W a:O a: :J -' 0 a: " I- 0 (9-, 0 a:l a:l :2; 0.3- 0 5 " , , , , " , >< " >< x x x x ^ ^ " , " , " , A I I I IVTlIM (Q1Il} Sandy Silt (ML): fine - grained sand with roots, loose, moist, brown. : REOROf:K' Pallha FOnTIatlon (Qp) : Sandstone: weathered, fine - to medium - grained, poorly ':graded to well graded, some lenses and layers of gravel and ":clasts, moist, brown. siltY -SandSiOne: -w-eafuer-ed:' fine: -tomed,um~' gramed,- c-IastS-,- -. brown. End of test pit at 6.5 feet. No groundwater or seepage encountered. Trench backfilled and tamped on 4-23-98. 10 15 SCALE, I Inch= 5 feet IH=Vl SKETCH TlNG SlOPE WE OS 12 7 102 ma,c max 26 8 107 N30E - BUILDING PAD ,""" ..., Qal 0 " : '. Qp c , I I -r ~ D I I .L ;- ~ I~ .--- , ... . ;.~ ,,'.y. r Qp DENSITY TEST ~ / . DIVE SAMPlE ~ Converse Consultants Project Name. SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONITRACT 24182-1&2 Temecula. California I For: Newland A.<:<:nri::1t...<: ~ Project No. 98-81-420-08 Drawing No. A-2 ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I. I I I I Log of Test Pit No. TP- 3 Dates Drilled: 4/23/98 Logged by: MBS Equipment: Backhoe/Case 580 Driving Weight and Drop: Ground Surface Elevation(ft): 1130.0 Depth to Water(ft): None Encountered Checked by: 40 Ib / 12 inch MSl SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ' I SAMPLES f- ~ f- I 0 3: This log is pan of the report prepared by Converse for this project and should be - read together with the repon. This summary applies only at the location of the 0 UJ :s u u. 0: f- boring and at the rime of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at orher ~ ::J I I locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data CJ) f- Z 0: a. UJ 3: ::J f- presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. > ><: CJ) UJ a. <(0 ...J 0 0 >-;;:- I UJ 0:0 0: ::J ...J 0:" f- 0 O...J 0 ro ro 2 oE, 0 5 X)( x x x )( x x x x x x x x ><)( x x x)( x x x)( )()( x)( rOT T T IVTT 1M (Qcol} Silty Sand (SM): fme - to medium - grained, with clay, porous with small pinhole size voids, roots and animal burrows near surface, moist, brown to dark brown. BEDROCK' V.lIh. Form.tion (Qp) Silty Sandstone: weathered, fine - to medium - grained, massive, some clay binder, occassional clasts. brown to light brown. End of test pit at 6 feet. No groundwater or seepage encountered. Trench backfilled and ramped on 4-23-98. 10 15 l SCALE, I inch;5 reef (H;VI SKETCH 25/10' 5 119 45 10 125 I FENCE POS I I .---- ..-----..-.-----..-..r..-.-..-----.---.I"".--------..-..------ .- I DENSITY TEST--:1 [J Qcol -----.-.- --~ ..-.-.- .-...--.-.------.....---. .-.-.-.-..---..--..-...-..-.....i.... - ____ I I "., ~ l . Qp o . _,.t:. ". Qp ---- ---... DRIVE SAMPLE -. " ----------1-------------- ---.---------r- - --- --~~--~! ~ Converse Consultants Project Name. SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGA T10NrrRACf 24182.1&2 Temecula, California I For: Newland A~~nri~t~~ " ----.-.------j--- I I Project No. 98-81-420-08 Drawing No. A-3 Y" I Dates Drilled: 4/23/98 I Equipment: Backhoe/Case 580 I Ground Surface Elevation(ft): 1135.0 Log of Test Pit No. TP- 4 Logged by: MBS Driving Weight and Drop: Checked by: 40 Ib / 12 inch MSI Depth to Water(ft): None Encountered SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ~AMPLES I- >R l- I 0 This log is pan of the report prepared by Converse for lhis project and should be a S .:= read together with the report. This summary applies only at the location of [he 0 LU U LL a: I- boring and at [he time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other - ::J Z I I locations and may change at this location with the passage of time. The data CJ) I- a: 0.. LU S ::J I- presented is a simplific~[ion of actual conditions encountered. > ~ CJ) LU 0.. <<<.9 -' a >-;;:- I LU a:a a: ::J -' a a: " I- 0 <.9-, 0 co co 2 o.s, a I I I cm I ITVlTTM (Qcol) Silty Sand/Sandy Silt (SMIML): fine - to medium - grained, roots, an imal burrows, buried fence post, moist, brown. BEOROCK' P,uh, Fonn,tion (Qp) Sandstone: weathered, fine -' to medium - grained, massive, moist, brown. I 5 I I 10 End of test pit at 8 feet. No groundwater or seepage encountered. Trench backfilled and tamped on 4-23-98. I I 15 SCALE: I Inch= 5 feet (H=Vl I I: I. ";-... II II II \ : ,I -.... " I DENSITY TEST ----0 .1 I DRIVE SAMPLE I Qp I I @ Converse Consultants I SKETCH Qeol Q"'--- " " I "- ' . '." I Qp' .', "~ I 1 Project Name. SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTtGA TtON/TRACT 24182,1&2 Temecula. California I For: Newland A ~~nri'lfl"~ Project No. 98-81-420-08 12 11 113 ds 24 10 98 ds N55W_ Drawing No. A-4 ?) I Log of Test Pit No. TP- 5 Dates Drilled: 4/23/98 Logged by: MBS Checked by: 40 Ib / 12 inch MSI I Equipment: Backhoe/Case 580 Driving Weight and Drop: I Ground Surface Elevation(ft): 1135.0 Depth to Water(ft): None Encountered I SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS , SAMPLE I- oR I- 0 This log is part of the report prepared by Converse for this project and should be 0 S ~ read together with the report. This summary applies only at the location of the 0 w - U u. 0: I- boring and at the time of drilling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other ~ ::J Z I I locations and may change at this location with [he passage of rime. The data (jJ I- 0: a. w S ::J I- presented is a simplification of actual conditions encountered. > ><: (jJ w a. <(('J ...J 0 >-;;:- I w 0:0 a: ::J ...J 0 0:" I- 0 ('J...J 0 <0 <0 2 0.3- 0 FIT T (At?) 12 11 Silty Sand (SM): fine - to medium - grained, moist, muttled, 101 loose to medium dense, brown. r 18 8 105 ds 5 25 12 105 End of test pit at 7 feet. No groundwater or seepage encountered. Backfilled and tamped on 4-23-98 10 I I I I I I 15 I SCALE: I Inch=S feet (H=Vl SKETCH N20E - I I Fill SLOPEl I ----.------1--....-.....-------. r- r PROPOSEDIFILl _!__--1-1-_ _ I I ? DRIVE SAMPLE I ? OEOF I SLOPE I ~______~f21______L- ? I I I I I DEEPENED TRENCH J. I FOR nilRO TESlj EXISTING Fll(Af) \'- / -::' \ 1-/ ,; "" 11/ I -.-___._______.....1_.._______.....___...._.....__.____ , _"_"I__ I I ~ Converse Consultants Project Name. SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION/TRACT 24182-1&2 Temecula, California I For: Newland A ~<:nri~rp.<: Project No. 98-81-420-08 Drawing No. A-5 7A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ . o e -+- ~ I I SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBDLS IYPICAL GRAPH LETTER DESCRIPTIONS .'.'.0. .....-""""........ CLEAN 000 GW cw.'oU - SoI.ND WDm.IItf3, GRAVEL GRAVELS 0-0.0.0 um.E OR NO f'I€S AND GRAVELLY (umE OR NO GP POORLY....cIWlEII cw.VELS. SOILS FlNES) lORA'JEl. - SAND WlXT1.RES. um.E OR NO FN3 COARSE GRAVELS GM SOY lORAVEl.$, l;RA.'o'El,.- GRAINED tr.40RE THAN 50% WITH FlNES $IKl-SLT~ SOILS OF COARSE FRACTlON RETAINED ON &APPRECIA8L.E GC aAYEY CRA'o'D..$, CMVEL - NO. 4 SIEVE At.! UNT Of FINES) SAND - ClAY IolDCT\MES MORE THAN SOX OF MATERIAl. IS LARGER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE FlNE GRAINED SOILS l.lORE mAN sox OF WATERLIJ.. IS sw.u.ER THAN NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE CLEAN SANDS SAND AND SANDY SOILS (umE OR NO FINES) SW WELL-QRADEI)~os. roRA'JELly !WIllS, um.E OR "" .... SP POOIl1.Y-cRADED $lHlS, Q!AVEl..I..Y WID, urnL OR "" .... SM SUY 5N<<lS, So\ND -:5I.T """"'" SC CLAYEY s.\NnS, SANtI - aAY """"" NORGAHIC SIJ$ NlO VERT ML FN: SANlJS, R<XX f1.OI.M. SILlY OR QAY[Y FH.: _llRa.AmSUSMlKlIl.DfT NJACNllC QA'YS Of" LOWlD CL ......"'^""". '*Yl1.LYaAYS, $l.N0'l' ClAYS, SIt.JY ClAYS, LEAN CLA'l'S OL ORCANI: $US 1HJ ORCAHIC SIlTY aAYS Of" LOW ......,."., MH -""'''''''''''' OIII~flNESAND 011 $I..T'/' SOLS CH IN:;lRCA.NIC aAYS Of" HOlP1.ASTClY OH ORCANI: aAYS OIF IolEOIJIlltl 1IIQtPlAS'nCfTT,OACI.NC "'" PT F'tAT,HlUJ$,5'IINII"SOCLS WlTlil<<.:HOflGANI:COtm>ll'5 NOTE: DUAl sn.laOLS ARE USED TO INDICATE BORDERUHE SOIl ClASSlFlCATIONS ~UP1. lYP. c:.a.I.IO mN. ~ l.lnl-lnn AS110l 0-1557-91 StandQn:l Tut Wethod !qANrwm PF"NF'T1UTInN rr<rr Spilt b<u-r.l IIOmplw In oecorda~ with AS1V 0-1 ~88-84 Standord T.at IolMhod Z!Ht~"'1P::"9~L42;81.~.. ~:lw. driven DR~ ~uP'r No ~ O!~JRArn RlllK "'-'UP!. GROlJNOWAn:ll WHll F' DRillING CROIINnw...~ An1=R DRIIIINC MORE THAN 50" OF' COARSE FRACTlON PASSING ON NO. 4 SIEVE SANDS WITH FINES BORING LOG SYMBOLS SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL Tract: 24182-1 &2, Temecula. Colifornio For: Newlond Associates (APPRECLA.8LE AMOUNT OF' FINES) SILTS AND CLAYS UQUJD UMIT LESS """ 50 lABORATORY' TESTING ABBREVIATIONS (k:U;:':hown In Appendix B) C1 A.~FlCAT10N Plosticity Crain S'IZ. Anolyeie PO"Ir\9 No. 200 51_ SQnd Equivalent Specific Gravity U:pcIlU1lon Indu Compoetlon Curve pi ~ wo H ., " m~ .smE!IliJJj Pock.ri PIII"1.trometer Direct Sheer Direct Sheer (Bingl. point) Unconrmed Comprell8ion Trioxlol Compra8ion Yon. Shear , d. do' " '" w SILTS AND CLAYS UQUlD UNIT GREATER THAN 50 CON~ IOATlON ~i:~F'9,)iVAIIIF CHFUIC'.AI ANA! ~I~ flFt":'TR'1r.J.1 Rf":;l<;'TMTY , ", , " " HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS I UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION AND KEY TO BORING LOG SYMBOLS I .~ I C:\Ilom.\~~ Project No. INVESTIGATION 98-81 -420-08 Converse Consultants Drawing No. ~ A-6 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I. I I I I APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM ?jIJ I I I I I I I I I I I I. I I' .' I I I I I APPENDIX B . LABORATORY TESTING PROGRAM Representative samples of the site soils were conducted for the purpose of evaluating their physical properties and engineering characteristics. Test results are presented on the exploration logs and in this appendix. A summary of the various laboratory tests conducted is presented below. In Situ Moisture Content and Drv Densitv Data obtained from these tests, performed on relatively undisturbed ring samples obtained from the field, was used to aid in the classification and to provide qualitative information regarding strength and compressibility. The percent of moisture as a function of dry weight, and the dry density in units of pounds per cubic foot (pcf) are provided in the right-hand columns on the exploratory test pit logs. Grain-Size Analvsis A representative sample was tested in accordance with the ASTM Standard D422-61 to determine its grain-size distribution. The grain-size distribution is used to aid in the classification of the soils. Tests results are presented in Figure No. B-1, Grain-Size Distribution. Laboratorv Maximum Densitv and Optimum Moisture Tests A laboratory maximum density and optimum moisture content test was performed on a representative bulk samples of the site soils. This tests was performed in accordance with the ASTM Standard D1557-91, Method A procedure. The results are presented in Figure No. B-2, Compaction Test. Direct Shear Tests A total of five (5) direct shear tests were performed on representative relatively undisturbed ring samples of the site soils. Individual rings were soaked prior to shearing. Each ring was sheared under a given normal stress and at a constant rate of strain. Three rings, each under a different normal load, were tested for each test to determine the shear strength properties. Results of the tests are presented on Figures No. B-3 through B-7, Direct Shear Test. 93-B1 -420.0B Converse Consultants ICCI ENTIO FFIC EIJO BF] LEIN EWLAN DI96-420\96-420-6. SG] R B-' "?"\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I Consolidation Test A representative undisturbed sample of the Pauba Formation bedrock material was tested to evaluate the settlement characteristics of on-site soils. This test involved loading a specimen into the test apparatus, which contained porous stones to accommodate vertical drainage during testing. A porous stone was also placed over the sample to accommodate upward drainage. The specimen was then loaded with normal loads. Resulting vertical deflections were recorded at various time periods. The load was increased after the sample reached a reasonable state of equilibrium. The sample was tested under field moisture conditions up to a normal load of 2 kips per square-foot. The samples were then submerged with water. Test results are presented on Figure No. B-8, Consolidation Test. Sample StoraQe Soil samples presently stored in our laboratory will be discarded 30 days after the date of this report unless this office receives a specific request to retain the samples for a longer period. 93-81-420-08 Converse Consultants \CC I ENT\O FFI CE\JOBFI LE\NEWLA N D\96-420\96-420-6. SG IR B-2 7Jb I II I I I I I I I I: , It I" I I~ I, I I I: IJ COBBLES UNIFIED SOIL CLA.SSIFICATION GRA VEL SAND COARSE FINE COARSE SILT OR CL4Y U.S. SIEVE SIZE IN INCHES HYDROMETER 3 3/4 3/8 4 10 20 40 60 140 200 100 "'""- \ (Q 1\ , 1\ 1\ ~ \ ~N 1 1 I' 80 E-< :c Cl - "" ;;:. >- m 60 Cl z - Ul Ul ~ D.. E-< 40 z "" u cr:: w D.. 20 o 10' 100 10-2 10-" 102 10 1 10-1 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETER SYMBOL BORING o TPZ/Blk 1 DEPTH (it) 0-5 DESCRIPTION Silty Sand (SM) GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION o 20 E-< :c Cl - w :;= >- m 40 Q W Z - <r: E-< "" cr:: 60 E-< Z "" U cr:: w D.. 80 Tract 24184-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figure No. 1 ?o.. ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I "-- 130 u 0.. Z - b :r: 0 &l 125 >= t; Z ~ >- Cr: Q 120 SAMPLE DEPTH SYMBOL LOCATION (it) o TP2/Blk 1 0-5 140 1\ \ '\ \ \ 100 PE SPECIFl \ e;..--... 1\ / \ \ <3 ~ 1\ \ \ \ \ \ 1\ \ 135 RCENT SATURATION C GRAVITY = 2.70 115 110 o 5 10 15 MOISTURE CONTENT IN PERCENT 20 DESCRIPTION TEST METHOD OPTIMUM MAXIMUM DRY MOISTURE (50) DENSITY (pc!) Silty Sand (SM) o I 557(A) 9.0 125.4 COMPACTION TEST Tract 24186-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Em.pire Figure No. B-2 ~ I I I I I I I I I, I I I I' I I. I I I, 11 2.0 / ~ /v /' V / / ~ Ul ~ z Ul g] 1.0 0:: E-< Ul 0:: ~ '" ::r; rn .0 .0 1.0 2.0 3.0 NORMAL STRESS IN KSF 4.0 5.0 4.0 ~ rn ~ Z ~ Ul Ul '" 2.0 0:: E-< rn 0:: ~ '" ;r:: rn ^- ;( v~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 0 .0 .0 .2 .3 .1 .4 .5 HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION IN INCH BORfNG/SAMPLE : TP-1/S1 DEPTH. (It) DESCRIPTION : Silty Send (SM) STRENGTH INTERCEPT (ks!) .000 FRICTION ANGLE (degree) 29.7 1-2 (PEAK STRENGTH) (PEAK STRENGTH) MOISTURE DRY DENSITY VOID NORMAL PEAK RESIDUAL SYMBOL CONTENT (,,;) (pef) RATIO STRESS (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) 0 14.0 120.9 .393 1.00 .57 .54 0 19.5 113.6 .483 2.00 1.11 1.01 6. 19.2 113.6 .483 3.00 1.73 1.61 DIRECT SHEAR TEST Tract 24186-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figure No. B-3 1>.\ I I I I I I I I I: I~ Ii I I I I~ I. I~ I: , I 4.0 /' V / / roo. Ul ~ z Ul g] 20 C<:: E- Ul C<:: ~ '" ~ Ul .0 .0 10.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 NORMAL STRESS IN KSF 8.0 4.0 ""' Ul ~ Z ~ Ul Ul IC=l 2.0 C<:: E- Ul C<:: <: IC=l ::r: Ul ~ ", 1 ~ ~~ ~ - ~----' r' ~ y:7 o .0 2 .3 .1 .4 .5 HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION IN INCH BORING/SAMPLE : TP-1/S2 DEPTH (It) DESCRIPTION : Silty Sandstone STRENGTH INTERCEPT (ksf) .160 FRICTION ANGLE (degree) 36.3 4-5 (PEAK STRENGTH) (PEAK STRENGTH) MOISTURE DRY DENSITY VOID NORMAL PEAK RESIDUAL SYMBOL CONTENT (%) (pef) RATIO STRESS (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) 0 18.5 110.5 .524 1.00 .88 .51 0 17.7 109.7 .536 2.00 1.56 1.48 6 17.5 109.9 .533 3.00 2.34 2.12 DIRECT SHEAR TEST Tract 24186-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland En~pire Figure No. B-4 14' '~ I I I I I I I I I' " [' "f ; 11 I' I In I: Il I 1\ 11 2.0 I I ./" ~ V ~ V~ (0. If! ~ z Ul ~ 10 c:::: f-- If! c:::: < f=J -'- If! .0 .0 1.0 2.0 3.0 NORMAL STRESS IN KSF 4.0 50 4.0 (0. If! ~ Z If! If! C=:l 2.0 c:::: I b If! " T < -'- f=J If! .1 I T I I T , T I T I I I ~ 2J T T .2 ..3 .4 .5 HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION IN INCH BORING/SA);JPLE : TP-4/S1 DEPTH (a) DESCRIPTION : Sandy Sill (Ml) STRENGTH INTERCEPT (ksf) .055 FRICTION ANGLE (degree) 23.3 2-3 (RESIDUAL STRENGTH) (RESIDUAL STRENGTH) MOISTURE DRY DENSITY VOID NORMAL PEAK RESIDUAL SYMBOL CONTENT (%) (pef) RATIO STRESS (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) 0 29.9 95.2 .756 1.00 .52 .49 0 3c..B 92.5 .808 2.00 1.00 .91 '" 4-0.7 90.7 .844- 3.00 1.4:- 1 .35 DIRECT SHEAR TEST Tr2ct 2-.1162-1 and ., for: Ne'.vl.~=-ld Asscciates PrClject. No. 96-61-420-C8 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figu:.e No. 8-5 bt".7 '/ I I I I' 1 I I I I I I I' I I I, I; I 1\ IJ 4.0 /' V / l/ ~ Ul ~ z Ul gJ 2.0 ~ b Ul ~ <<: kI ::r: Ul o .0 10.0 4.0 6.0 NORMAL STRESS IN KSF 2.0 8.0 4.0 ~ ~ ~ T /2F ~ ~ ~ Ul ~ z ~ Ul Ul "-l 2.0 ~ b Ul ~ <<: kI ::r: Ul .0 .0 ..3 .2 .1 .4 .5 HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION IN INCH BORING/SAMPLE : TP-4/S2 DEPTH (It) 7-8 DESCRIPTION : Sandstone STRENGTH INTERCEPT (ksf) .176 (PEAK STRENGTH) FRICTION ANGLE (degree) 36.6 (PEAK STRENGTH) MOISTURE DRY DENSITY VOID NORMAL PEAK RESIDUAL SYMBOL CONTENT (%) (pet) RATIO STRESS (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) 0 J2.1 90.4 .86J 1.00 .91 .68 0 J2.5 97.6 .727 200 1.68 1.50 " 26.9 96.1 .754 300 2.40 2.21 DIRECT SHEAR TEST Tract 24186-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figure No. 8-6 At>.. I I I I I I I I I. I; " I. I I I, I. Il I~ Ii IJ 2.0 ./ / /' ~ / /' ./ / V [c, (f) ~ z (f) g;] 1.0 e::: E- (f) e::: <l; r=:I :r: (f) .0 .0 5.0 2.0 3.0 NORMAL STRESS IN KSF 1.0 4.0 4.0 L-- = I ^-'" & ~--o [c, (f) ~ z ~ (f) (f) w 2.0 e::: E- (f) C<: <l; r=:I :r: (f) .0 .0 .2 .3 .4 .1 .5 HORIZONTAL DEFORMATION IN INCH BORING/SAMPLE : TP-5jS2 DEPTH (It) DESCRIPTION : Silty Sand (SM) STRENGTH INTERCEPT (ksf) .119 FRICTION ANGLE (degree) 27.2 3-4 . (PEAK STRENGTH) (PEAK STRENGTH) MOISTURE DRY DENSITY VOID NORMAL PEAK RESIDUAL SYMBOL CONTENT (%) (pel) RATJO STRESS (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) SHEAR (ksf) 0 15.1 97.4 .717 1.00 .64 .63 0 14.7 94.4 .771 2.00 1.13 1.10 6 18.9 89.2 .875 3.00 1.67 1.62 DIRECT SHEAR TEST Tract 24182-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 96-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figure No. B-7 A.-6 I I I I I I I I. . I: I~ I- I' I I, I, I I Ii I 2 c.... :r:: " ~ ~ :r: z ~ 4 ~ " Z "" :r: u E-' Z 6 '" U 0:: '" c.. 10-1 o LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 1 10 102 .719 .684 .650 o E=: <<: 0:: Q - o .616 > .581 .547 8 I '\ "- ~ \ 1\ \ ... \ - -- - - -- \ f._ _ - 1-- 10 BORrNG DEPTH (ft) TP-2/S1 2-3 DESCRIPTION Sandstone MOISTURE CONTENT (%) DRY DENSITY (pet) PERCENT SATURATION VOID RATIO INITIAL FINAL 6.5 20.2 98.1 105.3 24 91 .719 .602 Note: Solid circles indicate readings after addition of water CONSOLIDATION TEST Tract 24182-1 and -2 For: Newland Associates Project No. 98-81-420-08 Converse Consultants Inland Empire Figure No. B-8 AlP I I I I I I I I I. Ie . II~ I I I. Ie II I I; IJ APPENDIX C SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS bl\ I I I I I I I I I 11 II: I~ I I~ I. I II I( APPENDIX C SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Stability analyses of the proposed cut and fill slopes were performed for both static and pseudo-static conditions. A repeatable high peak horizontal acceleration of 0.15g was used for the pseudo-static analysis. The computer program "CLARA," developed by 0' Hungr Geotechnical Research, Inc., of Vancouver, Canada, was used to perform these analyses. This program offers the option of using various material strength and geometry to model the sliding surfaces. The cut slope at section B-B' shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map, was analyzed as a three (3) material system comprising colluvium and fills over Pauba Formation bedrock. Results of the slope stability analysis with selected shear strength parameters and unit weights for soils are included in this appendix. The Colombo's isotropic material strength model was adapted for this analysis. The slopes stability analysis was performed in accordance with Bishop's simplified method. The cut slope at section E-E' was analyzed for static as well as pseudo-static stability. The location of the section E-E' is shown in Drawing No.1, Geologic and Test Pit Location Map. The fill slope was modeled as a two layer system comprising fill over Pauba Formation bedrock. Results of the slope stability analysis with selected soil unit weight and shear strength parameters are also included in this appendix. Based on the results of this analysis, the proposed fill slopes should have a static and pseudo-static factor of safety of about 2.0 and 1.46, respectively. The stability of the cut slopes may need to be reevaluated based on field observation during grading. 93~81 ~420~08 Converse Consultants IC CI ENTIOFFICEIJO BFILEINEWLAND\96~42019 6~420~6. SGIR C-1 11 t>{b ;' I I I I I I I I I- I; I; I I I, I I: I~ I~ II Converse Consultants, Irvine, California CLARA - SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Project: Data File: Data Set: Tract 24182-1 and -2 4208a.CLA Analysis by: MSI MSI Da t e: 05 -13 -1998 RUN IDENTIFICATION LABEL: Static Analysis (Section B-B') Number of Active Columns 16 Max. No. Columns in Y-dir. 16 Slide Volume........... 9.37E+02 Weight of Slide Mass... 1.07E+05 Sliding Surface Area... 9.96E+01 Earthquake Acceleration 0.00 Axis of Rotation Y-coordinate Axis of Rotation Z-coordinate Total Water Trust Force ..... Unbalanced Transverse Force . Z-coord. of unbalanced force -Nega t i ve Norm. Forces O. 00 % 160.00 230.00 O.OOE+OO 1.81E+00 134.66 OF WEIGHT !! NUMBER OF WARNINGS ISSUED CONCERNING THE PRESENT SOLUTION: ... 1 FACTOR OF SAFETY: Bishop's... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.078 SUMMft_RY OF ~ATERIAL PFD DISCONTINUITY PROPERTIES - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NO. LABEL UNIT WEIGHT AI MA.TERIALS: 1 Pauba Format 2 Colluvium 3 Fill 115.00 110.00 125.00 150.0 50.0 100.0 COHESION BOR. VERT. FRICTION HOR. VERT. PORE-PRESS. R.Zl.TIO* B-BAR 150.0 50.0 100.0 35.0 23.0 25.0 35.0 23.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NOTES: Material layers are numbered from bottom up Negative integer signifies the applicable piezometric surface number * M I I I I I I I I 11 II II I' I' II, 11 11 I I~ I] Al FILE 4208a.CLA, x = II Ocol Op 012 Op o CRITICAL SLIP SURFACE F. S. (Static) ~ 2.0 ONE DIVISION SECTION B-B' 40 -so I' I I I I I I I, I: I Ij I 1 I. I' I I, I I I: I: Converse Consultants, Irvine, California Ch~RA - SLOPE STABILITY ~~ALYSIS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Project: bata File: Data Set: Tract 24182-1 and -2 4208a.CLA Analysis by: MSI MSI Date: 05-13-1998 RUN IDENTIFICATION LABEL: Static Analysis (Section B-B') Number of Active Columns 16 Max. No. Columns in Y-dir. 16 Slide Volume........... 9.37E+02 Weight of Slide Mass ... 1.07E+05 Sliding Surface Area... 9.96E+Ol Earthquake Acceleration 0.15 Axis of Rotation Y-coordinate Axis of Rotation Z-coordinate Total Water Trust Force ..... Unbalanced Transverse Force . Z-coord. of unbalanced force Negative Norm. Forces 0.00 % 160.00 230.00 O.OOE+OO 1.68E+00 134.39 OF WEIGHT !! NUMBER OF WARNINGS ISSUED CONCERNING THE PRESENT SOLUTION: ... 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FACTOR OF SAFETY: Bishop's... 1.486 SUMMARY OF MP.TERIAL AND DISCONTINUITY PROPERTIES NO. LJI.BEL UNIT WEIGHT COHESION HOR. VERT. FRICTION HOR. VERT. PORE-PRESS. RATIO* B-BAR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AI MATERIALS: 1 Pauba Format 2 Colluvium 3 Fill 115.00 110.00 125.00 150.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 50.0 100.0 35.0 23.0 25.0 35.0 23.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOTES: Material layers are numbered from bottom up Negative integer signifies the applicable piezometric surface number * 5' ,'/ , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I AI FILE 4208a.CLA, Op x = II Ocol Op Op ~ CRITICAL FAILURE SURFACE F. S. (pseudo - Staticl ~ 1.48 o ONE DIVISION 40 SECTION 8-8' 6Z, '/ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Converse Consultants, Irvine, California CLARA - SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------- Project: Data File: Data Set: and -2 Analysis by: MSI Tract 24182-1 4208Fill.CLA MSI Date: 05-13-1998 RUN IDENTIFICATION LABEL: Static Analysis (Section E-E') Number of Active Columns 8 Max. No. Columns in Y-dir. 8 Slide Volume '" ........ 6.48E+01 Weight of Slide Mass... 7.13E+03 Sliding Surface Area... 2.45E+01 Earthquake Acceleration 0.00 Axis of Rotation Y-coordinate Axis of Rotation Z-coordinate Total Water Trust Force ..... Unbalanced Transverse Force . Z-coord. of unbalanced force Negative Norm. Forces 0.00 % 131.00 168.00 O.OOE+OO 1.21E-01 142.00 OF WEIGHT !! NUMBER OF WARNINGS ISSUED CONCERNING THE PRESENT SOLUTION: ... 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTOR OF SAFETY: Bishop's... 2.008 SUMMARY OF MATERIAL AND DISCONTINUITY PROPERTIES NO. LABEL UNIT WEIGHT COHESION FRICTION HOR'. VERT. HOR. VERT. PORE-PRESS. RATIO* B-BAR ------------------------------------------------------------------------- AI MATERIALS: 1 Pauba Format 110.00 2 Fill 110.00 150.0 100.0 150.0 100.0 35.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * NOTES: Material layers are numbered from bottom up Negative integer signifies the applicable piezometric surface number 6'0 - / I I I I I I I il. .I~ , .t - f- Ii At =f At2 CRITICAL SLIP SURFACE F. S. (Static) = 2.0 - ,I I I Ii , i 11 I; I ii, I I. I I I I Qp - I I I FILE 4208Fill.CLA, X = / / Op I I o ONE DIVISION SECTION E - E' - - - I 40 , ~A. 'J I I I I' I- I I I II 11 , 111 I; I I ii, I. Il~ , > Ii 11 Ii Converse Consultants, Irvine, California CLARA - SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS -------------------------------------------------------------------- Project: Data File: Data Set: Tract 24182-1 4208Fill. CLA MSI and -2 Analysis by: MSI Date: 05-13-1998 RUN IDENTIFICATION LABEL: Pseudo-Static Analysis (Section E-E') Number of Active Columns 9 Max. No. Columns in Y-dir. 9 Slide Volume........... 9.44E+Ol Weight of Slide Mass... 1.04E+04 Sliding Surface Area... 2.72E+Ol Earthquake Acceleration 0.15 Axis of Rotation Y-coordinate Axis of Rotation Z-coordinate Total Water Trust Force ..... Unbalanced Transverse Force . Z-coord. of unbalanced force Negative Norm. Forces 0.00 % 134.00 168.00 O.OOE+OO 1.49E-Ol 141.64 OF WEIGHT !! NUMBER OF WARNINGS ISSUED CONCERNING THE PRESENT SOLUTION: ... 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FACTOR OF SAFETY: Bishop's... 1.461 SUM~~~Y OF MATERIAL AND DISCONTINUITY PROPERTIES NO. LABEL UNIT WEIGHT COHESION FRICTION HOR. VERT. HOR. VERT. PORE-PRESS. RATIO* B-BAR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AI M.ATERIALS: 1 Pauba Format 110.00 2 Fill 110.00 150.0 100.0 150.0 100.0 35.0 25.0 35.0 25.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * NOTES: Material layers are numbered from bottom up Negative integer signifies the applicable piezometric surface number ~ / 'I I I I I I 1 -1-" I~ I',' .' J I ~I I. , ' Ii 'I I' 'I '- '- '- Ii AI '- Qp '- , , , FILE 4208Fill.CLA, / / Qp , X ~ 0 - - - t AI2 CRITICAL SUP SURFACE F. S. {Pseudo - Staticl ~ 1 .46 - - , , , ONE DIVISION ~ 40 SECTION E - E' ~