HomeMy WebLinkAbout031704 PC Agenda
..
~
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk' (909) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MARCH 17, 2004 - 6:00 P.M.
********
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Mathewson
Roll Call:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. It you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all wilt
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 17, 2004
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\03-17 -04.doc
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued from February 18, 2004
2 Planninq Application No. PA03-0429 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to
construct two 8.573 square foot office/warehouse buildinqs on 1.87 acres of land located at
the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West, Rick Rush. Associate
Planner.
New Items
3 Planninq Application No. PA03-0707 a Second Extension of Time for Planninq Application
No. PAOO-0276 a Development Plan to desiqn and construct a 15. 883 square foot office
buildinq on a .64 acre lot located on the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North.
Matthew Harris. Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: April 7, 2004
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2004\03-17 -04.doc
2
,
,
ITEM #2
"
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 17, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Ternecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Chiniaeff, and Chairman
Telesio.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 17, 2004.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Continued from February 18, 2004
2 Planninq Application No. PA03-0429 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to
construct two 8.573 square foot office/warehouse buildinqs on 1.87 acres of land located at
the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West
At this time the Public Hearing was opened.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
1
Mr. Dean Davidson, 40023 Myrtlewood Court, architect for the project relayed that the applicant
has made changes as requested by staff.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner. Chiniaeff moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-013.
Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0429, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO 8,573 SQUARE
FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS ON 1.87 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE
SOUTH AND ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL,NUMBERS 921-480-079 & 921-480-08
New Items
3 Planninq Application No. PA03-0707 a Second Extension of Time for Planninq Application
No. PAOO-0276 a Development Plan to desiqn and construct a 15. 883 square foot office
buildinq on a .64 acre lot located on the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North
Associate Planner Harris presented staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following:
. That the planning application is a second extension of time;
. That staff determined that there are no outstanding issues in terms of Development
Code provisions;
. That during review of the time extension request, the Public Works Department
requested that one additional condition of approval be added to address the
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (see Condition of Approval no. 39);
. That all previous conditions of approval have remained the same.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael Richter, 41635 Enterprise Circle, spoke on behalf of the applicant relaying that the
applicant concurs with the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-014.
Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULAAPPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0707 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF
TIME) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-0276
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A
15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING (KEETON
BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
For Commissioner Guerriero, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed she would explore the gas
station issue on Del Rio.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that there will be a meeting held with Bill
Storm, Shawn Nelson, Gary Thornhill, and Bill Hughes in regard to Harveston, on Monday,
March 22, 2004.
Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with the dress code not being enforced at the
Promenade.
For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she has passed her dress
code concerns to Steve Brown, who has contacted the Police Department.
Chairman Telesio relayed that the State of the City Address will be held March 25, 2004, at .
Pechanga.
Chairman Telesio also noted that he spoke with Jean and Elton Ward and they will be returning
to the next Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske reminded the Commissioners to turn in their Form 700.
Ms. Ubnoske also noted that she has some very good candidates for the assistanVassociate
and senior planner positions.
Ms. Ubnoske queried if the Commissioners would be interested in name badges. .
R:IMinutesPCI031704
3
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:12 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular meetina to
be held on Wednesdav. April 7, 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula. .
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
John Telesio
Chairman
.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
4
ITEM #3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
March 17, 2004
Prepared by: Rick Rush
Title: Associate Planner
File Number PA03-0429
Application Type: CUP/Development Plan
Project Description:
A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct two 8,573
square foot office/warehouse buildings on 1.87 acres of land located at
the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West
i:8J Approve'with Conditions
Recommendation:
(Check One)
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
CEQA:
(Check One)
i:8J Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15332
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cif Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
t
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
W. Dean Davidson Architect
Completion Date:
September 8, 2003
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
March 17,2004
General Plan Designation:
Business Park
Zoning Designation:
Business Park
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Warehousing
Auto Body Shop
Warehousing
Open Space
Lot Area:
1 .87 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio .22
Landscape Area/Coverage 25%
Parking Required/Provided 34 Spaces/44 Spaces
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
i:8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
(or)
o 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff.
i:8J 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and
staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-
wide Design Guidelines and the Development Code.
(or)
o 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheef' (Attachment A) has been completed and
indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cif Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
2
ANALYSIS
At the February 18, 2004, Planning Commission meeting the applicant was encouraged to make
the following changes to the proposed project:
. Increase the landscaping along the south property line (visible from Diaz Road)
. Relocate the Fire Department connection valve, detector check and'the post indicator
valve
. Add articulation to the north Building elevation on Building A and the east building
elevation on building B
In response to the Planning Commission's concern with the lack of screening along the south
property iine, the applicant has added seven 15-gallon trees. The original plan called for a
mixture of Coast Live Oak, Fern Pine and California Sycamore. The applicant, in keeping with
these tree species, has added 5 90ast Live Oaks and 2 California Sycamore's to the south
property line. The Coast Live Oak trees are evergreen and will provide screening all year
around. It is the opinion of staff that the additional trees have addressed the Planning
Commissions previously stated concerns.
The applicant has relocated the Fire Department connection valve, detector check and the post
indicator valve to a location acceptable to staff. The project has also been conditioned to group
and screen all utilities from public view.
Lastly, the Planning Commission gave clear direction to the applicant in regards to the lack of
articulation on the north elevation of Building A and the east elevation of Building B. The
applicant addressed these concerns by adding an element to both buildings that projects out
from the buildings and extends past the rooflines. This element is a repeat of an element found
on both buildings. It is the opinion of staff that the applicant has addressed the concerns stated
by both the Planning Commission and staff in regards to the lack of articulation for the building
elevations visible from the public view.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
i:8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class
15332, In-Fill)
(or)
o 1. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental
Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
(or)
o 1. An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following
potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption
of the mitigated Negative Declaration'for the project.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cif Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
. 3
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
In staff's opinion the applicant has addressed the comments and concerns raised by both the
Planning Commission and staff in regards to consistency with the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. The proposed project as designed is now consistent with the Development
Code and the City Wide Design Guidelines as they relate to architectural design. Therefore,
staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010E)
1 . The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development
Code.
The proposal for two office warehouse buildings is consistent with the land use .
designation and policies reflected for the Business Park (BP) land use designation within
in the City of Temecula's General Plan, as well as the development standards for the
Business Park (BP) located in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is
therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and
density of the proposed warehouse use. -
2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the
General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed warehousing use against the adjacent
land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be consistent with the
surrounding uses. The area in wtiich the project is to be located has a mixture of uses
which includes auto related uses and warehousing uses. The proposed use will not
adversely affect any of the surrounding properties as all of the loading and unloading
activities for the building have been located to the rear of the site.
3. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and
other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the
Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
Staff has reviewed the proposed project against both the Development Code and the City
Wide Design Guideline requirements for a warehousing use and has found that the
project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. The loading for the building will take
place at the rear of the site not visible from the public right of way. The majority of the
on-site parking has been located at the rear of the site and will be screened by both of
the buildings.
4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
4
Staff has reviewed the proposed warehousing use and. found that' it will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention
has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able
to be adequately served by the Fire Department in an emergency situation.
5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole
before the Director of Planning.
This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing
where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before
the Planning Commission renders their decision.
Development Plan (17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the
Business Park (BP) land use designation within in the City of Temecula's General Plan,
as well as the development standards for the Business Park (BP) within the Development
Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically
suitable for the type and density of the proposed 8,573 square foot buildings.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed architecture is consistent with the Development Code and the City Wide
Design Guidelines. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been
found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building shapes and
offsets provided serve to break up the massing of the building visible from the public
view.. The project has been reviewed against the Community Design Element goals and
policies found in the General Plan and have been found to meet the goals and policies.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6
2. PC Resolution No. 2004-_- Blue Page 7
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
3. Staff Report (February 18, 2004) - Blue Page 8
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
6
!'!Ii!
.i~,!! I .' 11m!!!!!!,'
~ !l~~ I! lu!!l: ,: ;lli!lIl!!i!!!
~ I!~~ 111liiliilli,11 !ililnm!n l~'!
II HI', . !. I IIi/II!! Ill'
ill lliild III !Ii iil m:
.' ! liil
II
Ip I
lil!
Ill!'l
!lltl!
"
f.-
a
--'
-........
,
II
n...
W
.J
o~
~~ Ii
~~h
~ ~ Ii
[W
~~
woo,
~ffi'
w
e
i
. ~~ ~ii"
l r-~ i Ilnl
,1_ ~ ill h
~ L \ !
,
0i
ili
IIJ
1I=-
Lll"9
..~...N
" 'P
! ~ 'I
/; I
~ i
~ I'
~
. ,
~ I
~ ,
-~
I
lllLU ' II
I -, I
II I
II '
----4
,
--'
-I
-,
i !
.
. I,
I I
I
!
.
I' I'
"
. !
..","'..",,"'.
-~.-..
.....,m~[IM...,,_-...,.,,-h1-,,"'''
. ,r." i .a-.~Ol
,.~
.<>-,0;-
I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
~ I ~
I ~ ,I I
.
I ~~
I ~~ \oj ~-
I .' I
~~~ ~
"- <:J ~J ..~
d., :h, I
II I
I, I
I I I
I I ,
I I
I I
II
~ .lh~1 L
,t-." .'0-."
.9-.9'0 .....,s,
.t-,SI"
j'D
, "
j
/;
.i)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
I
,
I
I
I D
I
1 -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
"fi
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
hi:
t ~ ~ I
I
I
I
I
'"
\;
Ii
, C\I
I I
lL
~
.
~ ~
~ ~ ~lh w
): g ~
, , ~~ u~
J . . ~~ II
u~i
~ ~ II
~~i
w
e
t
z ~ !.
~ !l' !
" 51; II
~
0 ~ 1'1
0
~ I
~~ i I h
0
;i
I .
I I !
.
, ~ I R
; ! I
J I
!
; .
, I' "
I'
. !
~
.
1- j
;.
"""'''''--''-
""<<'fRO""'"
_--.-.-......-o.-.-,ct
f'D
'P ~i
f/\U?"
<1
/l
~ ;
'1_______
is
IU~
--------~
<.,;
~
z
~
0,
~
~ ~~
.II-.OS ffi
.~-.L~ I ~ l
,
I
,
.
,
,
~ ~
--- ,~,
-- .>11
I <~,
t:l1r--
II ..)1
lb.d ~
~
~
r'
L
.!'-,I
I~~,
"-~__ _ _ _ _~k-11_ ___
I!\TEN - - -
LJi
iD
0;: IL
\!)Ul
~(()
Dr-I)
--.1' .
50;)
0)-
<~~
,,,,,,,1.,
.o-.~
~
,
,
,
~ b
.
,
,
7
~
a
"
0
a
.,
~ "
~ ,
I " !.
~
,
f'
(")
I
0...
~ "
Ii ;2"-
~ fi~
( ~~-
W
~~
~~ I!
-~l
O~!
WOOl
f~ i
~'"
W~'
~m
W
e
~
() Ii
~ IS i"
~ ~ ~I
i'l ,II
" "
c5 R~ ~
~ !
;i
i !
.
. I!
I I
I
!
I', Ii
"
.1
..""".OI""'.._m_..WY"""""""".......,~,,-.-NVl<-<~-'''o;t
z
o
~
w
"
@
.\I-.~
.~-,"
ill-
Iii
z
o
c
<
~
i
"~-,"
.t-,"
z .
~4'
<J),,'
~'"
&~
~ D
5::=1
~::>
~ill
~
Ii
~
.i
~
.
<
w
III ! I
Ill! In!
1 'PI I 1,1
! illf '!lll
'!!!!!I!lnl
!ii!! l!11
ElBBI!I~~ Ell!Il!ltm
i
~
'i
l'
.1
.}.____.______l_
.~-,,~
.----:O::-91-~
Ii
!l!
~il
!\
z
o
c
<
~ ~-.';:, -- . ttI"~
,----
~ '
,
'<t
I
a..
W
J
o~
~~ II
o~h
nil
~m ,!
W~,
~m
w
€)
~
I) I"
; II!i
~ i! II
8,11l
z !
.:Ii
o
;i
!
L
!
I
l
I:
!I
<
z
o
~ I
.....,.."'",<.>I""'_"'_.~."..'''''''''''''''~...'''.MO-v"h111'H.''"'',z
'L()
Id...
.~...GC
iliin9
"'- "
w .
n \l) ~
}- z -
~ a ~i
z --1 <C.
~ S ~
WID
~
W
~
u~,
ococ'!
-<I
u~
~Ul
oc -,~
WOO,
~ffi
W
I
II 'II
I Ii I h!
;! I In
i!1I 1,,11
ll!l!dllll
ili HIli
~ ~ - ,-, ~ 8 ElI!II!l mJ
ElB~<.:J
e
t
~ I
! 1111
~ : II
~ i Ii
Djl
~
0
'"
,
I I
,
~ I ~
I I
I
I
. I ;
I !I
,
~
"
o
o
z
G
~
~
w
rri
c
~
<
w
.r...;c
.0-.91
1<'0'1".9-," 1- ,i:tl~
!\
z
o
~
~
W
I
~
o
z
z
2
c
<
~
w
c
~
"'
<
---.........-,........"
..........
-.-
_...,.-.-""",
, J.II-':'"''''
. ~ ~
~ .
~ 1'2:: U J!I
" !
! i
t\~ ''I' I II
~ I !!
; ~ "I "! I, i
<'I ~ " 1; ~ ; l <'i '" I
" II! 'I
I ~ I lP'11j Ii II
0 .. iI .. ~ !Ii ~J
.- ~, I: ''Iii!! 8 a2
. .
, 0 !! '" II'
l! ~ ill i' i ,.
.............. l ... ~ I:i milllll
~ ~
, Gll3eJee.se0
1'1
"1 l~ ;
I
j &i It ! I Ji~
)', II ! '" fi
:{; ]"'"IS'"'' f- ~
.0 <f () ~l ' .
0-;" '-' I,
* . 1
E !r
/. .I! !l
','
,
~
,~I
I
1
I'~I'
, .
(l "
f-
a
-'
,
~
w
~
gi
o
w
'"
tj :l::lt
3~
'<( 9";"
Q -~
.
-"
I'
,:1 :i
",1
.,
'"
~ 4; ~
ct !f~
<< ~ ""
Q l6 22
\
0'_
Q
~
Q
,,,
0'
~
wi
~I
0:
1"1
z
w
............
1.Jl;,..~,.JJ'..-!'
~
4 ~
Olil""""'''t.--.<.~
~" :
, i'ijl ~
" 1 I r j. i1 r
I I ,
,
i1
l:~i
.
i
! I
i I Ii
,
!'i!l!!! '
51!!!.!!
II '11 '
I
tUb~~~
~~ I '~-"'''' ""-,,,'-,~,, '-'0
~.~ .. ~ ,..'s .......''''..'''''...,,,,,,
. '. i,'~~~I'. ~NINN""J S3UI1I:JV;I NOll'o'J~J3~ ,/' -'
<~~6.~ (LOa .,u~o'l C'~JOJ!IOJ
&! ~_ : I :3~n1031IHO~'" 3d'r-lSONYl -.,' r-'"
, r"<l dnO~ VHS....Hl.. ' , I
""""""""tM<:I-1:n'IICOtJU-_-....'OPOO-K<:_......>':I-~
~~-
l)(SM3fVVi !:lIVl:O I9lMO
"
-E <>
",] w.J-t; ~
. ~ I.ij -
~u 3i '0
I>ISM3rVV'l 2: ptJlll S1301:fv'd ,~
III:
,
,
il.! Ii
11I1! >
,Ii!,i!!
lill Iii
~1:1I1!'!
~ ~hf ~i~
~ ~ ~ t;
II 2 ~ ~
t't't't't't't'
:ilSlilllill!:iI
~ ~ 3 ~ ~ 2 :
I
~ ! II
S I! II
~ 1111,' i
sllll II
~[;F:~~:~~~~::;~~:=~----~~:~}~~.~-~~.~~~~i~~~
I "
, " I I
;-+--;,--:=_ :...~=:~.L===-= - - -~~~.~ ~ ~,~ -=--=---=::f1~'f;: ~"
!------~-r_-------'>.'1[~r-.fr I,
, : :--
I
..
,<
~~
~~
..
;<
~
-'.
~! I']
!in,:
q,!, I
Il,! ':
Ill! I: I
,/-~
: '- - - ~
_-;, I
-:~d I
" '!
-->1
')
cici
:>:>
~
~. ~
,
I.
z
<(
...J
IL
~i
~:
j!
ILl
>-1
a:'
<(,
z:
-I
=<,
:J.
WI
a:1
IL,
I
I
,
i
1
I
I
I
!
!
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
j,
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
\
Ii; !
,
Iii! I I
! I
il 'i 'i ~ .
;11I ,
. " I !
'lp !Ii iil
1" . ,
! 1m .. , ! ,
III III
i , I
i e!!l1~" ~J::~ .,~~ , ~ i
. .
~~~~: HI II' I I I I
,
< . , I
.11 I i , ;
! I II , I
I ~b I I
n~p , I I
! ill! ii! I ! ,
, ,
\ !
I !
! 'I i I
,II i I iii ill I ! I
I ill I I !
I I!! I Ih i ~ i
I ,
1,IWij:/! ~o! i ~ ,
~iH! l~! ",l1hll
080. . '" I !t] I
180 0 @ . I
-- '
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Or Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
7
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA03-0429, A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
TWO 8,573 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE
BUILDINGS ON 1.87 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT
THE CORNER OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH AND
ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST KNOWN AS ASSESSOR
PARCEL NUMBERS 921-480-079 & 921-480-080
WHEREAS, W. Dean Davidson filed Planning Application No. PA03-0429
(Conditional Use PermiVDevelopment Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but,not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application on February 18, 2004 and March 17,2004, at duly noticed public hearings as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity
to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing on March 17,2004 and
after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have
occu rred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving the Application,
hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.04.010E of the,
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code.
The proposal for two office warehouse buildings is consistent with the land use
designation and policies reflected for the Business Park (BP) land use
designation within in the City of Temecula's General Plan, as well as the
development standards for the Business Park (BP) located in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed
warehouse use.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
1
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional
use will not adversely affect the adjacent use~, buildings or structures.
The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in
the General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed warehousing use against the
adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be consistent
with the surrounding uses. The area in which the project is to be located has a
mixture of uses which includes auto related uses and warehousing uses. The
proposed use will not adversely affect any of the surrounding properties as all of
the loading and unloading activities for the building have been located to the rear
of the site.
C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and
required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other
uses in the neighborhood.
Staff has reviewed the proposed project against both the Development Code and
the City Wide Design Guideline requirements for a warehousing use and has
found that the project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. The loading for
the building will take place at the rear of the site not visible from the public right of
way. The majority of the on-site parking has been located at the rear of the site
and will be screened by both of the buildings.
A. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the community.
Staff has reviewed the proposed warehousing use and found that it will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire
Prevention has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined
that the site will able to be adequately served by the Fire Department in an
emergency situation.
B. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the
application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the
record as a whole before the Director of Planning.
This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public
Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on
this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision.
Section 3. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving the Application,
hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.05.010F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of state iaw and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
the Business Park (BP) land use designation within in the City of Temecula's
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
2
General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Business Park (BP)
within the Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned
and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed 8,573
square foot buildings.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare.
The proposed architecture is consistent with the Development Code and the City
wide Design Guidelines. The proposed building architecture and building
materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The
varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the massing of
the building visible from the public view. The project has been reviewed against
the Community Design Element goals and policies found in the General Plan and
have been found to meet the goals and policies. The project has been reviewed
for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable
policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to
Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines.
Section 5. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan
to construct two 8,573 square foot office/warehouse buildings on 1.87 acres of land
located at the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West with
conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed
necessary.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17'h day of March 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\C U 1'\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, 'Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of.
March 2004, by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\C U P\2003\03.0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
5
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0429
Project Description:
A Conditional Use Permit and Development
Plan to construct two 8,573 square foot
office/warehouse buildings on 1.87 acres of
land located at the corner of Enterprise Circle
South and Enterprise Circle West
DIF Category:
Business Park/Industrial
TUMF Category:
Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
921-480-079 & 921-480-080
Expiration Date:
March 17, 2004
March 17, 2006
Approval Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. ' The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicabie and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
6
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this development plan.
4. This 'Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6. The Director of Planning may; upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
7. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved ,Site Plan,
Grading Plan, Building Elevation, Floor Plan, and Landscape Plan contained on file with
the Planning Department.
8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. It it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
9. All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the surrounding parapet wall.
10. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
11. All downspouts shall be internalized.
12. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all
utilities, which ar'e to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines.
13. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
7
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
14. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
15. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
16. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
17. A separate permit shall be required for any window awnings.
18. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Development Plan.
19. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
20. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inch apart. The
numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street
and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
21. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
22. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which
meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance.
The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact
the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
23. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
24. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
25. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
26. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the
Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
8
27. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially to the
approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants.!5hall be shown. The plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The' plans shall be accompanied by the following
items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
28. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and
appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. '
29. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
30. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans.
31. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the
project, which shall consist of masonry walls and metal or wood doors, a trellis structure
over the top of the enclosure, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce
pavement damage from disposal trucks.
32. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International
Orange".
33. The applicant shall submit details of the employee patio areas to include type of furniture
to be installed, shade structures and paving materials.
Prior to Release of Power
1. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning
Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
2. Prior to release of power, all site improvements including but not limited to parking areas
and striping shall be installed.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
9
3. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
General Requirements
4. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to cO]llmencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
5. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
6. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
7. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter,
sidewalk, drive approach, storm drain facilities and sewer and domestic water
systems
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
8. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
9. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their right-of-way.
10. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
11. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
12. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
R:\C U P\2003\03.0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
10
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
13. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
shali provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and
liquefaction.
14. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
15. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
16. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
f. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
17. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
18. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
19. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
20. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone AE.
This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
It
which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain
Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
21. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
a. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
b. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
22. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Enterprise Circle West (Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include
installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach, drainage facilities,
signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
23. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
24. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
25. The Developer shall provide a reciprocal easement for ingress and egress.
26. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
27. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
12
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
28. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
a. Eastern Municipal Water District
b. Department of Public Works
29. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
30. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
31. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
32. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-l. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
33. ' The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-l. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
34. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required, (CFC 903.2)
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
13
35. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
36. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
37. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
. Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
38. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
40. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
41. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
42. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Articie 10, CBC Chapter 9)
43. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
R:\C U 1'\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
14
44. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
45. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
46. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
47. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
48. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
49. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
50. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
51. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Requirements
52. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
15
53. All parkways including areas within the ROW, fencing, landscaping and on site lighting
shall be maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
54. The Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan identifies a Class 3 Bicycle lane, which is
designated by signage only, on Enterprise Circle West and Enterprise Circle South. The
street improvement plans shall include the sign age and the developer shall provide.
Prior to Building Permits
55. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
56. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
57. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
58. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrics;1 plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
59. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
60. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
61. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
62. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998)
63. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
\
64. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
16
65. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
66. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
67. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
68. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
69. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
70. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
71. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
72. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
73. Show all building setbacks.
107. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
1. The applicant' shall comply with the attached letter dated August 21, 2003, from
Miranda, Tomaras and Ogas, LLP representing The Pechanga Banc of Luiseno Indians.
2. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 21, 2003, from the
Department of the Army.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
17
"-~
110. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 21, 2003, from
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conversation District.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
,
I
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Or Business Park\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc
18
'. ' j ,
MIRANDA, rOMARAS, OGAS & WENGLER, LLP
, - . . j . .~ <
\ . -: -- ~'.'
10755-F SCRIPPS POWAY PARKWAY #281 0 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92131
j I ' ji
TELEPHONE (858) ~54-0550 0 FACSIMILE (858) 777-5765 of WWW.MTOWLAW.COM
. ' . "
August 21, :2003
,
Mr. Rick Rush
Planning Department
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
f
t
i.
Via faLmileto (909) 694-6477
and U1.S. Mail'
I
I
Writers' Direct Dial
(760) 845-5422
Re:
Comments on 'Project Transmiua:IPrOject InfoJmation for Enterprise Circle
Business Par~ (P A03-429)
Dear Mr. Rush:
~
,
,
,
, . I
The PechaDl!3 Band of Luiseiio Indians (hereinafter, "PechaDl!3"). a federallv
reco2nized Indian tribe and! soverei2n 2overnment. is formally reauestin2, pursuant to
Public Resources Code !I 21092(b)(3). to be notified and invol~ed in the CEOA
environmental review process for the duration Or the Enterpri:se Circle Business Park (P A
03-0429) (hereinafter. the "Proiect".) \
, . [
Pechanga is in receipt of a Project Transmittal/Project Information issued for this Project,
We understand that this is a preliminary information-gathering request by the City, to determine
whether further environmental assessment is required for this Project under CEQA. Should
further environmental review occur, Pechanga looks forward to providing more extensive
comments on this Project. ' . \
PROJECT GENERALLY
As you know, Pechanga has a long history of involvement with development projects
within the City ofTemecula. Pechanga is not opposed to this Pr<;Jject, but would have serious
concerns about the Project's likely impacts on Native American cultural resources, due to the
Project's location adjacent to Murrieta Creek, and nearby recorded Native American
archaeological sites, Pechanga is concerned about both the protection of unique '!;-,n,._d__.____-- m ['i; ~
ifi\! ~ \~ ~ Q \!J U; ~
11 U I
\\ <, 1
'iD\ AUG 2 5 Z003 :1
1"11'
lU,-,
Mr, Rick Rush
August 21,2003
Page 2
(
I
I
t
f
irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luiseno village sites and ~rchaeological items which
would be displaced by ground~disturbing work on the Project, andf on the proper and lawful
treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains, and ,Isacred items likely to be
discovered in the course of the work. I
, I
Based on the cursory information in the Project TransmiWil/Project Information, it is
unclear whether this Project requires ground-disturbing work in pteviously undisturbed soils. If
so, the likelihood of impacts to cultural resources greatly increase~,
Further, the Temecula,area itself was part ofthe peChanga!Tribe'S aboriginal territory.
Consequently, it follows that, 'because this Project area is rich with cultural items, sacred cultural
items, and Native American remains, development of this Project/area may have a direct and
significant impact on cultural resources if the Project requires ground-disturbing activities in
previously undisturbed soils. f
Should further enviro~mental review ofthi~ Project occurl Pechanga requests that the
City and developer take steps' for the protection of any uncoveredlresources in the process of any
such assessment. Surveys may reveal significant archaeological Jesources and additional sites
which may be eligible for inclusion in the historic site register, m~y contain human remains,
and/or may be sacred Luiseno sites. If warranted, Pechanga will bngage in further assessment of
the Project area, in consultation with tribal elders, to identify moie specific concerns,
, I
I,
REQUESTED INVOLVEMENT
Given that Native American cultural resources may be affected by the Project, Pechanga
requests it be allowed to be involved and participate with the City and developer in developing
all monitoring and mitigation plans for the duration of the Project under California Public
Resources Code S 21081. Further, given the significant potential! for archaeological resources
within-the Project area, it is the position ofPechanga that pechan'ga tribal monitors should be
required to be present during all ground-disturbing activities in previously undisturbed soils,
conducted in connection with the Project, including any archeolqgical testing performed,
Pechanga requests that any further environmental review specifically commit to the inclusion of
Pechanga as a partner in negotiating the monitoring and mitigation; that it explicitly call for
Native American monitoring of all ground-disturbing activities; and that it commit to allowing
either in-place location or ori-site reburial of Native American human remains if any are
discovered during the Project.
~
According to the California Public Resources Code S 50?7,98, if Native American human
remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage commission must name a "most likely
descendant," who shall be consulted as to the appropriate disposition of the remains, Given the
Project's location in Pechanga territory, Pechanga intends to assert its right pursuant to
California lawwith regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this Project.
Accordingly, Pechanga further requests that the City and developer work with them to draft an
Mr. Rick Rush
August 21, 2003
Page 3
I
,
agreement which will address any inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources, including human
remains,
,
~
Pechanga looks forward to working together with the City pfTemecula, the developer,
and other interested agencies in protecting the invaluable Luisei'io ~ultural resources found in the
Temecula area,
Sincerely,
MIRANDf':" TO
i
GAS & WENGLER, LLP
i
,
Eve M, Wengler
Attorneys for the
anga ~and ofLuisei'io Indians
f
f
-t.
"
.
...~.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEE!lS
P.O BOX 532711
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
August 21, 2003
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
City of Temecula Planning Dept.
Attention: Rick Rush
Temecula Planning Dept.
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
If) It@
ttJ 4UC It tJ /!j !!
'~l)
Dear Mr. Rush,
i
I
It has come to our attention that you plan to construct a 9,090 square foot
office/warehouse building and a 8,898 square foot office/warehoUse building on 1.87 acres
near Murrieta Creek in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, <;:alifornia. This activity may
require a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit. '
A Corps of Engineers permit is required for the discharge of dredged or fill material into,
including any redeposit of dredged material within, "waters of the United States" and adjacent
wetlands pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972. Examples include, but are not
limited to,
1. creating fills for residential or commercial development, placing bank protection,
temporary or permanent stockpiling of excavated material, building road crossings, backfilling
for utility line crossings and constructing outfall structures, dams, levees, groins, weirs, or other
structures; ,
2. mechanized landclearing, grading which involves filling low areas or land leveling,
ditching, channelizing and other excavation activities that would have the effect of destroying
or degrading waters of the United States;
3. allowing runoff or overflow from a contained land or water disposal area to re-enter a
water of the United States;
4. placing pilings when such placement has or would have the effect of a discharge of fill
material.
Enclosed you will find a permit application form and a pamphlet that describes our
regulatory program. If you have any questions, please contact me at (213) 452-3418. Please
!
'.1 '."
I
-2-
refer to this letter and 200301472-CLM in your reply.
Sincerely, 1
C
Crystal Marquez
Project Manager
Enclosures
,
,
.I
WARREND, WILLIAMS
General Manager~ChiefEngineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501,
909,955.1200
909,788,9965 FAX
83927,\
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
August 21, 2003
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Rick Rush
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
\
Enterprise Circle Business Park
PA03-0429
The District does not usually review land divisions/land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate
letterslflood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporat~d Cities. Exceptions are made for
cases with -items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other
regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a
master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not
reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do 'not in any way constitute or imply
District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety
,or any other such issues. '
PA03-0429 is a proposal to construct two office/warehouse huildings totaling 17,958 square feet on a 1.87-
acre site located on the comer of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West within the City of
Temecula. -
The entire site is located within a combination of Zones AE and un shaded X boundary as delineated on Panel
No. 0607420005B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance
Program, administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
The US Army Corps of Engineers completed a Murrieta Creek Flood Control Feasibility Study on September
2000. Based on information obtained from the feasibility study, the water surface elevation for the ultimate
flow rate of37,300 cubic feet per second (cfs) is 102\.5 feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929). New
buildings should be floodproofed by elevating the finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the water
surface elevation for the ultimate flow rate of 37,300 cfs as determined in the Murrieta Creek Flood Control
Feasibility Study.
The project does not have any impact on the Murrieta Creek right of way, but due to the extreme hazard posed
by Murrieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing the development to proceed adjacent to the Creek
until the ultiriilite improvements can be constructed. Property within the floodplain sh(;>uld be conditioned to
construct the required improvements or participate in a finaricing mechanism such' as an assessment district to
ensure necessary improvements are constructed. If the City chooses to allow development to proceed, we
recommend that the City should condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other
pertinent information as needed to meet FEMA requirements.
,-- ,-" r" R G vD ~~\
.\, \, . rw ....
"., \.2 l'n l~ 1
i\ii" " 1\
II !.;' AUG Z 7 2003 I,D 1\
II".." ,.-1
,,'
~~__=- J
i
,
l
83927,1
City of Temecula
Re: Enterprise Circle Business Park
PA03-0429
-2-
August 21, 2003
The project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta CreeklTemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan
for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid for by cashier's check or money
order written to Flood Control District prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. Fees to be paid
should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
The follov.:ing information of a general nature is provided herewith for yo~r use:
. This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Disc.harge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit coverage from the State Water Resources COl)trol Board or the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval
should not be given until the City lias determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to
be exempt.
i
. If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City shortld require the applicant to obtain a
Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or ,written correspondence from these
agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. AClean Water Act Section 401 Water
Quality Certification may be required from the RWQCB - San Diego Region prior to issuance of the
Corps 404 permit.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Teresa Tung at 909.955.4050.
s::: n~ ~L
~'
STEPHEN C. THOMAS
Senior Civil Engineer
TT:!ib
'r'
ATTACHMENT NO.3
STAFF REPORT
R:\C U P\2003\03-Q429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT 2.doc
8
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
February 18, 2004
Prepared by: Rick Rush
Title: Associate Planner
File Number PA03-0429
Application Type: CUP/Development Plan
Project Description:
A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct an 8,862
square foot office/warehouse building and an 8,560 square foot office/
warehouse building on 1.87 acres of land located at the corner of
Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West
o Approve with Conditions
Recommendation:
(Check One)
o Deny
i:8J Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
CEQA:
(Check One)
i:8J Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15332
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
W. Dean Davidson Architect
Completion Date:
September 8, 2003
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
March 8, 2004
General Plan Designation:
Business Park
Zoning Designation:
Business Park
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Warehousing
Auto Body Shop
Warehousing
Open Space
Lot Area:
1.86 acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio .22
Landscape Area/Coverage 25%
Parking Required/Provided 34 Spaces/44 Spaces
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
o 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
(or)
i:8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff.
02. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and
staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-
wide Design Guidelines, the _ Specific Plan, PDO, and the Development Code.
(or)
i:8J 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheef' (Attachment A) has been completed and
indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval.
R\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
2
ANALYSIS
The City Wide Design Guidelines identify desirable elements for industrial buildings. It is staff's
contention that the proposed design is not meeting the following elements:
. Variety of building indentations and architectural details
. Building entry accentuation
As stated in the Project Review Worksheet (see attached) the proposed project is not employing
a variety of building forms to create entry character. As proposed the applicant requests to
utilize awnings to define the entrances to the individual suites as well as entry columns at a few
of the entrances. The entry columns project out one foot from the exterior building elevation,
while the adjacent windows recess one foot. This two foot break does not create visual interest
for the building. The project as proposed does not provide a creative entry treatment for the
buildings. The project as proposed falls short of the intent of the Design Guidelines for creative
entry treatments.
These Design Guidelines also identify undesirable elements as well. Large blank and flat
surfaces are identified as undesirable elements. It is staff's opinion that the north building
elevation on Building A and the east building elevation on Building B need further articulation.
Further articulation to these elevations will provide needed relief to an area that will be highly
visible from the public right of way. The Development Code also discourages blank wall
elevations located on street frontages.
The Development Code requires that long unarticulated walls surfaces be avoided. Wall planes
should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty-feet without an offset. As a part
of the development review staff recommended that the applicants use contrasting vertical and
horizontal elements to break the visual mass of the fagade into smaller areas. The applicant
made revisions to the plans, but in staff's opinion this comment has not been addressed.
As proposed the rooflines do not create any opportunity for providing shadows. The
Development Code requires a variety of shapes and forms including roof overhangs be provided
to create shadowing.
Lastly, staff recommends that the applicant relocate the Fire Department Connection Valve,
Detector Check and the Post Indicator Valve from their current locations on site. It is the opinion
of staff that their current location on site is in an area that would be better served by upgraded
landscaping.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
i:8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class
15332, In-Fill)
(or)
o 1. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental
Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
3
(or)
o 1. An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following
potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption
of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project as designed is not consistent with the Development Code or the City Wide
Design Guidelines as they relate to architectural design. Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission provide comments and direction to staff in regards to the architecture.
FINDINGS
Development Plan
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Tentative Parcel/Tract Map
(Code Section 17.05.010F)
(Code Section 17.04.040F)
(Code Section 17.040.010E)
(Code Section 16.09.1400)
ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 5
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6
3. Development Review Comment Letters - Blue Page 7
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eir Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
4
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
R:\C U P\2003\03-Q429 Enterprise Or Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
5
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Industrial
Planning Application Number: PA03-0429
1. General Plan Designation: Business Park
Consistent?
Yes
, Consistent?
2. Zoning Designation: Business Park
Yes
3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination:
i:8J General Plan EIR
i:8J Sensitive Biological Habitat Map
i:8J Sensitive Archeological Area Map
i:8J Sensitive Paleontological Area Map
i:8J Fault Hazard Zone Map
i:8J Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map
i:8J 100 Year Flood Map
i:8J Future Roadway Noise Contour Map
o Other (Specify)
o Previous EIR/N.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date):
o Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date):
o Other:
4. Environmental Determination:
C8J 10 Day Review
i:8J Exempt
o Mitigated Negative Declaration
o Negative Declaration
o EIR
o 20 Day Review
o 30 Day Review
5. General Plan Goals Consistency:
Consistent
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
i:8J
Inconsistent
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Land Use
Circulation
Housing
OS/Conservation
Growth ManagemenVPublic Facilities
Public Safety
Noise
Air Quality
R:IC U P\2003103-0429 Enterprise Cir Business ParklPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
1
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Industrial
Consistent
o
i:8J
Inconsistent
i:8J
o
Community Design
Economic Development
6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency:
i:8J Site Planninq:
A. Are the service areas located at the sides and rears of buildings?
i:8J Yes 0 No
B. Is there a variety of building and parking setbacks provided in order to
avoid long monotonous building facades and create diversity?
i:8J Yes 0 No, why?
C. Are the buildings located on ''Turf Islands" where the office portion of the
building does not directly abut paved parking areas? 0 Yes i:8J No
Is there a 5 to 7 foot landscape strip provided between parking areas and
the office portion of the building? 0 Yes i:8J No
i:8J Parkinq and Circulation:
A. How has the plan been designed to ensure that parking lots and cars
are not the dominant visual elements of the site?
The subject site is located at a street knuckle with a 3D-foot ingress and egress
driveway located at the center of the knuckle. Only 11 parking spaces have
been located towards the front of the site. The remainder of the parking and
loading zones have been located to the rear of the site not visible from the public
view.
B. How does the plan provide screening of parking lots adjacent to, and
visible from public streets?
The building placement will serve to screen the majority of the parking from view
from the public streets.
i:8J Loadinq Facilities:
A. How does the plan alleviate the unsightly appearance of loading/storage
facilities from public review?
The project calls out one loading space per building and locates them to the rear
of the site not visible from the public view.
R:IC U P\2003103-0429 Enterprise Cir Business ParklPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc
2
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Industrial
i:8J Landscapinq:
A. How does the plan use landscaping to define areas such as entrances to
buildings and parking lots?
Landscape planters and decorative paving treatments have been provided at the
entrances to the individual units for both buildings.
B. Does the plan provide the following ratios of plantings?
i:8J Yes 0 No, why?
Trees
10% 36" Box
30% 24" Box
60% 15 Gallon
Groundcover
100% Coverage
In One Year
Shrubs
100% 5-Gallon
i:8J Architecture:
A. How does the plan employ variety in building forms to create entry
character and visual interest?
The proposed project as designed does not employ a variety of building forms to
create entry character. As proposed the applicant requests to utilize awnings to
define the entrances to the individual suites as well as entry columns at a few of
the entrances. The entry columns project out one foot from the exterior building
elevation, while the adjacent windows recess one foot. This two foot break does
not create visual interest for the building.
B. How does the plan avoid long (over 200') unbroken building facades, and provide
facades with varied front setbacks?
The proposed project does not have any facades that are greater than 200 feet
with out on offset.
7. Development Code Consistency:
A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code
Section 17.08.070?
Circulation:
The loading areas of the project have been located outside of the pedestrian
pathways for the site. The site locates parking adjacent to the buildings that will
be utilized for customer parking and parking spaces to the rear of the site for
employees. As proposed the project has provided bicycle parking spaces for the
project per the Development Code requirements.
R:IC U P\2003103-0429 Enterprise Cir Business ParklPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
3
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Industrial
Architectural Desiqn:
The Development Code requires that long unarticulated walls surfaces be
avoided. Wall planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater
than fifty feet without an offset. This can be accomplished by using contrasting
vertical and horizontal elements to break the visual mass of the fat;ade into
smaller areas. As proposed the rooflines do not create any opportunity for
providing shadows. The Development Code requires a variety of shapes and
forms including roof overhangs be provided to create shadowing. The project as
proposed does not provide a creative entry treatment for the buildings.
Site Planninq and Desiqn:
An outdoor dining area for each building has been provided on the site plan.
The areas appear to be large enough to accommodate the needs of future
employees. As a part of the exhibits the applicant calls out enhanced paving
areas, but does not provide details. The loading areas are located to the rear of
the site and will not be visible from the public view. No mechanical equipment
will be located at grade level. The applicant has sited the above ground detector
check, P.I. V and F.D. C within a prominent location of the front setback and will
need to be relocated.
Compatibilitv:
The proposed project is two warehousing buildings located amongst existing
industrial buildings and is compatible.
B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the
applicable minimum development standards?
i:8J Yes, with conditions
o No
Net Lot Area:
Total Floor Area:
Floor Area Ratio:
Lot Coverage:
1 .86 acres
17,958 square feet
.22
22%
~SetlitacRs:BUildirn!;~':u;,~if~i\;~ii0w
Front
Side
Side
Rear
Parkin
20 Feet
o Feet
o Feet
10 Feet
17 S aces
Front
Side
20 Feet
o Feet
21 Feet
5 Feel
30 Feel
47 Feet
19 S aces
R:IC U P\2003103-0429 Enterprise Cir Business ParklPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc
4
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Industrial
I~;rp'
Traffic
Habitat
Stream/Creek
Subs./Liqfctn
Air Quality
N/A
N/A
N/A
Applicable
N/A
North
East
West
South
'.SiJiii'oj?iiirdiri".ZOriioWEWEJII iH,G.eD!:lialiHlil,laF,\]l!le~i'~iJ'a.ti5f)1-Et
Business Park Service Commercial
Service Commercial Service Commercial
Conservation 0 en S ace
Li ht Industrial Business Park
R:IC U P\2003103-0429 Enterprise Cir Business ParklPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET doc
5
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:\C U P'\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT doc
6
~ UIl'l$ ,q'lJ
It
:~
~
'j
ill
i'
~
~
~
.
~ .
~ ~
o ~
~, .
~. '
_ 0
~~
~a
"
,
'II ~
'll\!, ~
! "
! ~I
.. I: IiiiiI
kO"It 141
~
~
.
""""'"
i .
I i I
I',' 'I j
I I I
Ii! ll!
II" ,p
II n I.'
lllllq II
!! I, III
Iln II i i
G6~\3eSee
i
J
II
I,
; ,
I ~ !
.
I~
[1- i ~~,
[I i II ==---'
. ~ ~ .".
". I ~~ g
LI ~ g~~ E3 .'-'
I~
I
i
II!
IIi
"
Ii
II
= at:>
~ "'"
@ ~
-,
~
~
'"
co
;'!
l-
e
,...,
!
~
12
, I-
fll '" e
" ...,
! :z
g~
~
.
.:
I
i t ..r,~.1l
---@ ~
" i
" fJ:- ......::::-
~ :.~ 'J.....~.::::--::.J
'" .~ ..... j
~""
c;: ~~ >--. .....SJ ·
....."
~,~ ~
wi 3.n:,,;.... "'~
" @ !
15 ~I \ ;
; rsI l<lU"'l.....,~t r :
l!iil!lI ", , .
<.>' ~I , ,
:g ~ , ~
I' .
II' '11 - z '" <.>
w 15. t " ~
I ,,' II /; ill I.
" l' ~ "
~ II d
t:~.b"~1l' I i I
!
,
lil!!1dllW
i,bil Iii li!!iU!!!I!! II I
~ !i.i,ll~ll.iu :r:!~I!!i~ ~ ilii
~ 'II hlllll :I !II I !ill
h! 1lI11 h II ,
11,1
lis I
1111,11'
! III
...
'....
a
--J
, lit liiiii:
, ..-
leL
<T
o
R.
~ 'P dO
dl~ = .....
O~h ~ ~
~mli @ ---,
i!! ~
w
~e
hi
~ I~ Ii
~ ii ,:
o I~
~
~l
f.-
a
~
"I'
[;j i
~i.
i!
~
I
I 0~
I ,
"
II
!
I
.
I
· -l
~~ 31JHO 3SIl:fdl:f31N3 ~8lil~
I gd~
I ~B"
, '
~ I
" '
~ I
d ,
~ I
IX
~ ,
~ I
'" ,
;Ii
.
I !
.
. II
I !
I
l
. I'
I ! i
~"Ul.-.~,~"-,-.-",,,,-.
. -..-.......""""....''''.
..~Il."."""""
C\l
I
[L
!D 'l' fi~ ~ ~
, I ! lj~ ~~.I ~ g
I I ! a.
I wo.i ~ c--J
I
I ~Ui c::J ~
/;
liiie ~-Z-
:> @ 4.
I ID .-,
. ~ 7'
i o:!
a
~ Iii II
~ II
~ ~~ i I Ii
01
~
'3<
1 ..". f
.t'-J' .~'" ","," !
.
I I I,
I I I I
I I I
I I I
I I I
I I . I ~
I I . II
I I . . II
I I ~
I
I #I-
I
I ~ I I
~ I ' I
t b~
. I . I
~ I ~ ~. ~
[~t) ,E-,Oi I
I
do ,h, I
I I l
I
I ~ .
I "
I .~/ ~
I
I
I ~
Q
----- ~
.hlG .t-,Q: .;",0
.Q-.~
Mfi<'1.....<CI,..._.._....rr.'.....,.".-.~..y___.
~
~
...
f'D
.
!
~
1 \~--- -----1~-----~
/l~
... .,;t;
-- '
---
"
/!
?=Ji
I
<0;
...,,,
.,;t;
IL
'"
"'
'"
!!2
...
.r.Ul
IF""" ,
~------~--
'1')I:l1f ----
II i -
fl...!
IL
'"
tr'
'"
N
N
F?"\"
_____ !1,.;,;,u
-"--
~Il
gl
\i)tL
zU1
DN
-1~
:::::,OJ
~-
.o-,tl:;
.'i(.hkoW
IL
<J)
o
N
...
N
IL
<J)
o
o
:Q
,I-.U.
i
.!
I
~~
---,
m
.
~
.
I , (")
I I
! D..
~;J
l~i 1':!0 ....
!h 0
~ 0
~ ,'..l
9~ c:' <I:J
.~ ~>I.
o~ gl 1':!0 ~
a
mUi @ --->
~
~~e
w
~
~ ~~
l
,
,
I
~
"
.
~
, .
~ b
*
9
~
.
~
~
~
e
I ~h.
! Iii!
~
',"
,
I !
.
, II
I I
I
l
.
I' Ii
I'
. !
~
..',w."t:lI"'"...._...._"'.. . "
....".,"......,""~..-...".,.-I<<l.-... -
OO'lO""."
~
"
~
,..
cQ
z
Q
JO
~
"
~
~
~
I
~
JO
~ I
II! f
III il
~
, JO
~ ""';;' - Oi'i'
~ ~
.
<
.C-."
_"~I-"""",~""1I-.-t>a"Ul-!.I"'i'
......~'''''...'''.
"""""0""'_",_
.C-.GC
z
Q
!i'
?;
ill
~
.C".1it
(j
!i'
, ?;
~
'"
~
z
.t-.lZ
In
'"
Z
ij ,
ill
(j
~
~
"
Z
~[o9
Ifi" J1
a l2 ~
i - -:
;:9~
~ill
I
II III
111,1 i I
i III' 11111
drill
IIII! 1!!H
see!!Jl!I!!I
.t".~
.l;-,Gl:
.0-.91
, l()
I I
lL
( ='"::J I;
,
g~1 ~ "'"
<:::>
o~d s c::> I
;'-..J
1111 = co
~ O><l I
:z:
~e @ <{
III -,
W ~ >,
(=y : CD..
-
IIII
~ ~~ II
~ i!' I:
01
~
o
3i
I ~
! !
.
.....__'../OnI".....-_,.
-...-......"'...... --
. ". ~'''''-~:... ---
"
il
z
Q
~
~
~
__!JITID-l:I'I'.I/IXI___IlT"~"'r.I"f""rD;Io'l;
~--
DlIlM3"ffl"""" """"
IlI8M3rvrt ~ PUV I 8l3Olf1d ."""",,
~~~
~ _ i! ,i!
.., l..c i-
lJa-'~~a
mUH'1f
z
~
~ f. '\
~~ .".
0
c::>
~l= N
ao
~ ~
<l: Z
Z @ <(
::!! ....,
::J ~
ll! ~ >.
en
Q..
I
.
i
i
I
I
I
!
.
I
.
,
I
,
i
III:
bbllll ~~.
I !! ! II ft
tttlitlit i.
i ,!i I ilIIiiillflfil
i'!i I, lImp
lli&lll1 I
,Ii: Iii
gnUII.1 ~ ! Ii
..hl..h j I 'I I
"'.. .. ~ III I I I
~;l!l II
T_[~=-n ~~_-~=~=~-_-=-n_nT----------l /
~_L_______~____ r ---__ ~... - ... -~J:-
I 0 ---~ ~....
! I i-~---------- r
~j :: /
11 tb -----~-----~-l~.~~~.~-----Q~p:i~/ i,
I I I.!....
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'-
I
\
~
Ii
I
I
I
~Iq')
Ii I '
~III! i
!I,/, '
~I I, i
--,
I~/-q/
I \ .-.-'
I -.-'-
::iJ' I
, I
---""<1
,
)
,...
:O------~-,----------------
*
~
i
i i i i :
llil !
IIIH i
i"lI -- I
,,- - l I
~IIII ; E
!iili'!!!!11 ! ~ I
I ~iiii iii;;i ~ ~ I
I "". ;..,tft ' i I
, ,
; ~!!:: !!!!!! ! I ~
.
I
I
I III! I, q I
I lil:1 illi!i i I ! ;
j
: I I ~ I
I H:li iIIlII I f i 1
! i <<i l I' ' ! :
!I!:ll'll~ll;:ll:!:ll "
k000' 0 '" f' I!Jl!
~i 00 0'" !PJJlI
=
'---
);>
:z
~
Co
r--'
=
=
....
~~' i
~I.
I' I,
I' ,: I!
I'll I,
,Ii:,!il
Iii: !Ii
!'II'II,
81 6Ii"!
21 ~!:' li:
I~;~~::~~~::~~:'::=::~~-~;t~~~~~~-~:~~;~
I ~ ' ,
, . I I
I 8 ' 1
I "
,--r-----~~===_=!-----------~----------~- r----
~' & ------ ~ i.-;-;--:-;,-;--- I -;7)
----------- ~ ,~-
--'-----,- I a I "'-
-- -~.:'
,
,
gii! d
~; ~ Ii
~'I.. ii
I~! ~ i~
w~ ~ l~
~j ~ ~3
~8 ~ ~o
~ ~ '1
~
z-
j~
~~
z"")
~<(
j~
a..C\l
>-""0
a:c
<l:al
z.....
::2(1)
...J..J
li!w
a.. 0
a::
<(
lL
JS~~>IO~~l ~
III
~ i; ','I
'\ ~ II i
~! I I ! ~ 'II: 'l
rl ~ i U: l[/',;_"_m ......
-<
o ~o
i'5~100VlO
~ a:: 01 1O0:> ~ N
_1-U)O~W'
::.:: z N I 1"1 ~n
g60"1;S.h::;~
~ <w<lM$~-
~ - -
~O::<iCJl.-.~O
Q8se~U~
~ ~O'l~LJetj~
ucn::!!z,,<(o
o~o~~-
,..., rL...oCl
0.. u~
Ii i i !
. , ,
.~ ... 1 J, I
Hili .
iT;: ~i I ! I
. ........1._ .
;IW ; ~
hii' n, 1Il I ! I
I !' i III , !
lilii iii . .. ! i
", ,
! ~ !' ::! ~ N ii Il ~ ~Ul , S i
, ,
;~m I!; H! ! ! i
I -"- "'" "
.
I I i ~
II I . i !
I IlI'I HI , I ~
I II ! ill I I
I i
i j ~
.
iU11 IIi ill i I i
I I I
I lull III Iii ,
! I i
Iii i i i! 1:1i "i '!
~ ~,,~, i ' ~
I,H! lii iHid~~~
.~@. . '" f mill
! @)(D ,) o .
~
!
~ 'jJ
""
_.l,H
z
o
.~
.~
,w
~
~
.!i;'
z
o
"
~
d
~
o
z
",z
,0
,~
,~. ~
.. ~
:0, w
~
~
<
w
,,,
1
<
o
~
~
~
~
;:i
iE
~
,
'I
i I
I'
:.1 -c.j
'~,.! ',' jtl
, I
~ I Ii_
I:
: i '
:0 ~:lll: I
__;;1 tiff
III ;,
i,i ,I
'!'!', 1'.
e (: .,:
IH. lar
nlll k 1'1
~1lI1 'n!,
Iii! Iii Ilill
willll
881"1668 BSSeI
r'
.i::XZ-----
v
.~.
r;--
'.,
:~!i
: "...~
~~;
~~~
i\ I
~ '
I
l
i5
r-
.
>
d
iE
~
"
~
:Xv-';.il:'~ff:.:-. hi ~
r-i__
,
o
t5 -<( I
Vi ~ _II
w in
00,-
>-Z
~ (5 ~
~::::::' 2'.i
a ~ VJ
~
~
,-
I
i
'Cj-
I
~
W
.J"
Ucr-
"<>
UO- g
w[{);:
(f)[j)~
Q;:W ~j
(l ~:3~
0:: {f} ~~
CJ "
I---:J;:;
z[l]
W
.a
~--~
u
w
e-
o:
U
'"
-<
e
,
ON
00 _
u~ g~
aa> ,"'
o -'
~ ~< ~:1
VJ wU gg-
o r!<(' ee
50::1-
<{ ~i ~"
o ::l~ .f~
Z 0>
-< ~
W
o
'"
~~
. J
L
i '
!
I
I I
J ,"
., !
!
i
!
I' ,
1- ;
ATTACHMENT NO.3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENT LETTERS
R\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\STAFF REPORT.doc
7
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive PO Box 9033 Temecula California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 FAX (909) 694-6477
September 8, 2003
W. Dean Davidson Architect
40023 Myrtlewood Court
Murrieta, CA 92562
SUBJECT: DRC Comments for Planning Application Case No. PA03-0429 for Enterprise Circle
Business Park located at corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle
West
Dear Mr. Davidson:
Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you regarding the above-referenced project. As a result
of the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting held on September 4,2003, the following list
of changes will need to be made and resubmitted for staff's review.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT-Rick Rush, Project Planner 694-6400
General Comments
1. The proposed project is located within the Business Park (BP) zoning district. Per the
Development Code requirements for this zoning district all warehousing uses require a
conditional use permit. In order to keep warehousing a part of the application your
Development Plan application must be changed to a Conditional Use Permit. Please
provide staff with a letter from the property owner requesting this change.
2. Please be advised that the Development Code does not permit certain types of
manufacturing within the BP zoning district. Staff has attached a copy of the Development
Code section (Chapter 17.08-7) for your information.
3. The minimum required landscaped open space for the BP zoning district is 25%. The
proposed project is only providing 20%.
4. The public hearing notice packet does not meet the requirement for 30 different property
owners. This will need to be corrected prior to scheduling the item for public hearing.
Site Plan
5. The proposed site plan does not indicate an area designated for loading for either building.
Staff is aware of Table 17.24.060 located in the Development Code, which provides a
minimum number of loading spaces required per building. The table indicates that buildings
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter.doc
less than 10,000 square feet do not require a loading space. However, the text portion gives
the ability to require spaces to adequately serve the use. It has been determined by staff that
the proposed buildings uses (warehousing and manufacturing) wiil require loading spaces at
each building. Please indicate at ieast one designated loading area (ten feet wide, twenty-
five feet long, and fourteen feet of unobstructed vertical height) per building not to be visible
from the public right of way.
6. The Development Code requires outdoor areas designated for employee gathering areas
such as plazas, courtyards and garden areas. These areas should include covered outdoor
areas for the employees to utilized year round. This is not being proposed as a part of the
application; please revise the site plan to meet this requirement.
7. The Development Code encourages design features that will contribute to the design
character of the entire site. The following examples are provided in code: ceremonial
entrance drives, enhanced visitor parking areas, decorative pedestrian plazas and
walkways, focal landscape treatments, and site sculptures. Please revisit the site plan to
see if any of these design features could be incorporated into the project.
8. In reviewing the site plan it appears that there is only one light pole being proposed. Please
be advised that the Development Code requires a minimum Illumination of one foot-candle
across parking areas and a two foot-candle at entrances. Lighting shall be consistent with
the requirements established by Riverside County to reduce impacts upon the Mount
Palomar Observatory. Provide all proposed light poles not only on the site plan but also on
the landscape plan for coordination with any proposed landscaping.
9. Bicycle spaces shall be required at a rate of 1 bicycle space for every 20-vehicle spaces
required. The bicycle spaces can either be Class I lockers or Class II racks (Development
Code Section 17.24.040Flb and c defines Class I and Class II).
10. Motorcycle spaces shall be required at a minimum of one motorcycle space per every
twenty-five required parking spaces for the entire site. This requirement is not being met.
11. Staff has concerns with the pedestrian walkways being provided to both buildings (not the
ADA required path of travel). The elimination of these areas may provide the opportunity to
provide more landscape along the front elevations of the buildings while still providing
access to the individual suites.
12. The site plan calls out two future monument signs. Section 17.28.440B allows only one
multi tenant monument sign per center. Please revise the site plan to indicate the location of
the monument sign.
13. Please be advised that the proposed buildings will be required to submit a comprehensive
sign program per Section 17.28.080 (a separate Sign Program application will need to be
submitted).
14. Staff has concerns with location of the trash enclosure nearest to Building "A". In this
location the trash truck will need to back up approximately 130 feet before being able to turn
around.
15. When a parking space is directly adjacent to a landscaped area, the plan calls for a two-foot
overhang into the landscaped area. Please be advised that the areas where the vehicles
over hang will not be counted towards the overall landscape requirement.
16. Please correct the net lot area for both parcels.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Lctter.doc
2
17. Please correct the FAR.
Elevations
18. The Development Code requires that long unarticulated walls surfaces be avoided. Wall
planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty feet without an offset.
The east and south wall elevation on Building "A" is not meeting this requirement as well as
the west and south elevation on Building "B". Please revise the project to meet this
requirement. This can be accomplished by using contrasting vertical and horizontal
elements to break the visual mass of the fayade into smaller areas.
19. Staff has concerns with the proposed parapet rooflines. As proposed the rooflines do not
create any opportunity for providing shadows. The Development Code requires a variety of
shapes and forms including roof overhangs be provided to create shadowing.
20. The project as proposed does not provide a creative entry treatment for the buildings. The
code suggests utilizing canopies, awnings, cornices or atriums to meet this concern.
21. The proposed window sizes and shapes are very similar. The Development Code
encourages varying the size and shape of windows. Staff recommends recessing the
windows and not bringing the storefront glass all the way to the floor. Also, please explore
options in providing natural lighting into the proposed rear area for each building. As
proposed no windows other than the storefront glass is being provided.
22. Please verify that the proposed roll up doors will be mounted on the interior of the building
per Development Code requirements.
Landscape Comments
Bold comments refer to site planning or grading issues. Non-bold comments refer to landscape
issues. The numerals in parentheses coordinate with the numerals on the red line landscape plan
attached.
23. A minimum 25% of the site is required to be landscaped in the BP zone. The applicant
proposes only 20%. Please provide additional landscape area as required to meet code
requirements (1).
24. It appears that the existing trees are mislabeled. Please correct (2). '
25. As planned, one existing large Pepper tree will need to be removed. It is recommended that
this Pepper be saved and the site plan be revised to save it in place (3).
26. Code requires pedestrian plazas and walks with planting, decorative paving and benches as
well as outdoor areas for employee lunches. Please provide for these requirements. The
outdoor lunch area should be located so that it is within a pleasing environment and will be
shaded in summer (4).
27. Code requires landscaping to be provided along long expanses of fencing and/or walls.
Code also requires large wall masses to be screened/broken up. It is recommended that
Building 'A' be setback a minimum of 5' from the east property line to allow space for
landscaping. The landscaping should include evergreen trees and shrubs to screen this 2-
dimensional east elevation. Please provide for this requirement (5).
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eir Business Park\DRC Letter.doc
J
28. All utilities are required to be screened. The applicant will be required to show and label all
utilities on construction landscape drawings and provide appropriate screening. Please
provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department
before starting the screen. Please group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design
around utiiities. Please also locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no
conflicts with trees (6).
29. Street trees are required at the rate of one per 30' of street frontage. Please provide street
trees as required (7).
30. Code requires a minimum 5' width planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking
areas. Curbs, walks, etc. are not to infringe onthis area. The parking lot curb appears to be
installed inside the 5' landscape area along the south property line. Please revise the site
layout as required to provide the full 5' width landscape area (8).
31. The site pian proposes a 2' car overhang into the landscape area to the south and west. It is
recommended that cars not overhang the required 5' landscape area. It is recommended
that the site plan be revised to show no overhang into the landscape areas (9).
32. Please provide sizes of trees at the following minimum ratios as required by the City-Wide
Design Guidelines: 10% @ 36" box, 30% @ 24" box, and 60% @ 15 gallon (10).
BUILDING DEPARTMENT- Mark Harold, Deputy Building Official, 694-6439
33. Curb ramps may not encroach into accessible parking spaces. Piease revise plans to reflect
a curb cut condition to provide access to parking space. California Building Code Section
1129B.4.3.
34. Please provide a clear identification of all proposed property lines for the project.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT- Annie Bostre- Le, Assistant Engineer, 694-6411
The following comments and requirements shail be complied with and submitted for review and
approval prior to our setting the Conditions of Approval for the above project.
Please revise the Site Plan to show the following:
35. A legible vicinity map
36. Accurate metes and bound
37. Label all easements with dimensions
38. Limits of Flood zone
39. Pad and Finished floor elevation
Please revise the Conceptual Grading Plan to show the following:
40. A legible Vicinity Map
41. Fill in Appiicant's Name and address information
42. Accurate Legal description in the title block
43. Accurate Assessor Parcel Numbers
44. Clarify the limits of the Flood Zone
This project may be conditioned for the following:
R:\C U P\2003\03.0429 Enterprise Cir Business Parl'\DRC Letter.doc
4
45. Permission to drain into the drainage easement
46. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing City right-of-way for the sidewalk on
Enterprise Circle West along property boundary and drive approach.
47. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
48. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
49. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU- Jim McBride, Deputy Fire Marshall- 694-6405
All questions regarding this letter shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau staff. A Fire
Department representative has reviewed the above referenced case and has the following
informational comments and corrections:
SITE PLAN
50. Provide site plan in engineering scale fo 20, 30, of 40.
51. FDC(s) shall be located within 50ft. of a public hydrant, on the right of way, and a minimum
of 40ft. away from the building (and grouped if multiple appliances). Show on resubmittal.
52. Provide Fire Department access to within 150 ft. of the surface of all portions of the
buildings.
53. Show the location and size of any aboveground or underground fuel tanks, waste oil tanks,
and LPG tanks.
54. Show all bus, loading, unloading, and delivery zones.
55. Show the types and widths of all gates. Manual and electronic gates shall be provided with
the Knox Rapid Entry System.
FLOOR PLANS
56. Show location of fire sprinkler riser. (Note, riser must be located in a separate room with
direct access to the outside of building.
57. Show location of fire alarm control panel (Note, must be located with fire sprinkler riser).
58. Short property line setbacks may require protected/rated walls and or openings.
R:\C U 1-'\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC L.etter.doc
5
TCSD- Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator- 694-6480
The TCSD has reviewed the Development Plan for the aforementioned project and has the following
conditions of approval.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
59. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
60. All parkways including areas within the ROW, fencing, landscaping and on site lighting shall
be maintained by the property owner or an established maintenance association.
61. The Multi-use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan identifies a Class 3 Bicycle lane, which is
designated by signage only, on Enterprise Circle West and Enterprise Circle South. The
street improvement plans shall include the signage and the developer shall provide.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
62. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
In summary, this letter serves to notify you of the results of the DRC meeting. Upon resubmittal
please submit 5 copies of the site plan, landscape plan, floor plans and elevations as a set. Should
you have any questions regarding this letter, please call me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Rick Rush
Associate Planner
Enclosures:
Table 17.08.030 of the Development Code
Redlined Landscape Plans
Letter from Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians dated 8-21-03
Letter from Riverside County Flood Control District dated 8-21-03
Letter from the Department of the Army dated 8-21-03
Regulatory Program Applicant Information Packet
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Or Business Park\DRC l..euer.doc
6
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive PO Box 9033 Temecula California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 FAX (909) 694-6477
December 2, 2003
W. Dean Davidson Architect
40023 Myrtlewood Court
Murrieta, CA 92562
SUBJECT: DRC Comments for Planning Application Case No. PA03-0429 for Enterprise Circle
Business Park located at corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle
West
Dear Mr. Davidson:
Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you regarding the above-referenced project. As a result
of the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting held on November 13, 2003, the following
list of changes still need to be made and resubmitted for staff's review.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT-Rick Rush, Project Planner 694-6400
General Comments
1. The proposed project is located within the Business Park (BP) zoning district. Per the
Development Code requirements for this zoning district all warehousing uses require a
conditional use permit. In order to keep warehousing a part of the application your
Development Plan application must be changed to a Conditional Use Permit. Please
provide staff with a letter from the property owner requesting this change. A letter will need
to be provided prior to any resubmittals.
2. Please be advised that the Development Code does not permit certain types of
manufacturing within the BP zoning district. Staff has attached a copy of the Development
Code section (Chapter 17.08-7) for your information.
3. Tho minimum roquirod landscapod open space for tho BP zoning district is 25~('. Tho
proposod projoct is only providing 20~('.
4. The public hearing notice packet does not meet the requirement for 30 different property
owners. This will need to be corrected prior to scheduling the item for public hearing. The
public hearing notice packet was sent back November 5, 2003.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doc
Site Plan
8. The proposed sile plan do os not indicate an area dosignatod for loading for either building.
Staff is aware of Table 17.24.9139 looated in the Developmont Code, whiGh providoEl a
minimum number ef leadin!:) spaGeEl required per building. The table inEliGatoEl that buildingEl
10Els than 10,000 squaro foot do not roquire a loading spaGe. However, tAe toxt portion givos
tAe ability te roquiro spaces te adoquately Elorve the use. It haEl boon determined BY staff that
the propoElod buildingEl usoc (warehouEling and manufactuFing) will roquiFo loading cpaoec at
each building. Pleaso indicate at loast one dosignatod loading area (ton foot wide, twenty
five feot long, and fourtoon foot of unobstruGtod vortiGal height) per Building net to be viElible
from the publiG ri!:)ht of way.
e. The DevelepFRont Code requiros outdoor areac designated for employoe gathoFing aroaEl
such aEl plazac, oourtyards and garden aroac. ThOEle areas sAeuld include Gave red eutdoer
aroaEl for the employeeEl to utilizod yoar Fl3und. ThiEl is not boing pFopoElod as a part of the
appliGation; please revico tho cito plan to FReot thiEl requireFRonl. Staff has concerns with
the proposed location of the outdoor areas. Staff recommends relocating both areas
as discussed in the DRC meeting.
7. The Development Code encourages design features that will contribute to the design
character of the entire site. The following examples are provided in code: ceremonial
entrance drives, enhanced visitor parking areas, decorative pedestrian plazas and
walkways, focal landscape treatments, and site sculptures. Please revisit the site plan to
see if any of these design features could be incorporated into the project. The applicant
provided decorative paving, please provide details of the paving.
8. In reviewing the site plan it appears that there is only one light pole being proposed. Please
be advised that the Development Code requires a minimum Illumination of one foot-candle
across parking areas and a two foot-candle at entrances. Lighting shall be consistent with
the requirements established by Riverside County to reduce impacts upon the Mount
Palomar Observatory. Provide all proposed light poles not only on the site plan but also on
the landscape plan for coordination with any proposed landscaping. This comment
appears to have been addressed with the location of more light standards on the site
plan, but not on the landscape plan. This will need to be done prior to the next
submittal.
9. BiGYGle spaoeEl shall be requirod at a rate of 1 bisyclo Elpaoe for ovory 20 '/ehiolo Elpaoes
roquired. The bioyele cpaoec Gan either bo Class Ilesl<erc or Class II raol<El (Dovolopment
Codo Section 17.24.040Fl BaRd 0 definoEl ClaElEl I and ClaElEl II).
10. MotorGyole spaGoEl Elhall be required at a minimuFR of one meteroycle Elpace por ovory
twonty five required parl,ing cpacoEl for tho entire Elite. This roqllirement is Rot being mot.
11. Staff has CeROOrnEl with tho podoctrian .....allw:ayc boing pro,..ided to both buildingEl (not tho
AD.^. reqllired path of tra'lol). The elimination of thoElo areaG may provido the opportllnity to
provido more landccape along tho front olovationc of tho buildings whilo clill pFoviding
aOGeCEl to the individllal Eluiles.
12. The site plan callEl Ollt twe futllro monument signEl. Soction 17.28.110B allO'....s only one
FRuiti tenant FROnllFROnt sign per sentor. Please rO'/iEle the site plan to indicate the locatien of
tAe FROnllmont sign.
13. Please be advised that the proposed buildings will be required to submit a comprehensive
sign program per Section 17.28.080 (a separate Sign Program application will need to be
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doc
2
submitted). This comment was not addressed, if the comment is not addressed staff
will condition the project to have a sign program approved prior to any building
permits.
14. Staff has concorns with location of tho tr-ash onolosure Aearest to Building ".'\,". In this
leeation tho trash truok will nood to back up apl'lroximately 1:39 feet gofere going agio to turn
arcluml. The trash enclosure was relocated, next to the outdoor patio area. Please
revisit this issue.
15. When a parking space is directly adjacent to a landscaped area, the plan calls for a two-foot
overhang into the landscaped area. Please be advised that the areas where the vehicles
over hang will not be counted towards the overall landscape requirement. Please eliminate
all landscaping within the two foot overhang from the landscape percentage on both
the site plan and landscape plan.
16. Please correct the net lot area for both parcels.
17. Please correct the FAR.
Elevations
18. The Development Code requires that long unarticulated walls surfaces be avoided. Wall
planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty feet without an offset.
The east and south wall elevation on Building "A" is not meeting this requirement as well as
the west and south elevation on Building "B". Please revise the project to meet this
requirement. This can be accomplished by using contrasting vertical and horizontal
elements to break the visual mass of the fayade into smaller areas.
19. Staff has concerns with the proposed parapet rooflines. As proposed'the rooflines do not
create any opportunity for providing shadows. The Development Code requires a variety of
shapes and forms including roof overhangs be provided to create shadowing.
20. The project as proposed does not provide a creative entry treatment for the buildings. The
code suggests utilizing canopies, awnings, cornices or atriums to meet this concern.
21. Tho prcll'losod window sizos and shapos aro 'lory similar. Tho Dovolopmont Codo
onoourages varying the size aAEl sRapo of '::iAdo','/s. Staff reoommonds recossing tho
windo.....s and not bringing tho storofront glass all the way te tho floor. Also, plaaso OJeplore
eptions in I'lrclviding natural lighting into tho proposod mar aroa for oach guilding. /\s
proposes AO windows othor than tho storofront glass is boing pro'/idod.
22. Ploase verify that tho proposod roll up deors will gO mountod on tho intorior of tho building
por Dovolol'lmeAt Cese reEluiromonts.
Landscape Comments
Bold comments refer to site planning or grading issues. Non-bold comments refer to landscape
issues. The numerals in parentheses coordinate with the numerals on the redline landscape plan
attached.
2:3. ^ minimum 2a~(. of the sito iE roquirod to bo landEcaped in the BP zeno. Tho applicant
propoEes only 20~<" PloaEo provido additionallandEcapo area aE requirod to moot codo
roquireR'lentG (1 ).
R\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eif Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doe
]
24. It aJ3poaFB that tho cxisting trocs are FRislabclod. Ploase correct (2).
25. .'IS planned, one existing large Pepper troe will need to be rome'lod. It is rooommended that
this Peppor bo saved and tho sito plan be rovised to save it in J3laoe (d).
213. Cese FGE!!liros J3odostrian plazas and walks with planting, decorative paving ans benohes as
'Nell as o\,!tseer aroas for omployoa l!lnohos. Ploasc pro'/ido for these roq\'!iromonts. Tho
olltdoor Illnoh aroa should be looates so that it is ':Iithin a pleasin€l environmont and will bo
shaded in summcr (4).
27. Code requires landscaping to be provided along long expanses of fencing and/or walls.
Code also requires large wall masses to be screened/broken up. It is recommended that
Building 'A' be setback a minimum of 5' from the east property line to allow space for
landscaping. The landscaping should include evergreen trees and shrubs to screen this 2-
dimensional east elevation. Please provide for this requirement (5). Staff has determined
that this comment still applies. Revise the site and landscape plan to show this
requirement is being met.
28. All utilities are required to be screened. The applicant will be required to show and label all
utilities on construction landscape drawings and provide appropriate screening. Please
provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department
before starting the screen. Please group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion.
Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design
around utilities. Please also locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no
conflicts with trees (6).
29. Street trees are required at the rate of one per 30' of street frontage. Please provide street
trees as required (7).
30. Code requires a minimum 5' width planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking
areas. Curbs, walks, etc. are not to infringe on this area. The parking lot curb appears to be
installed inside the 5' landscape are'a along the south property line. Please revise the site
layout as required to provide the full 5"width landscape area (8).
31. The site plan proposes a 2' car overhang into the landscape area to the south and west. It is
recommended that cars not overhang the required 5' landscape area. It is recommended
that the site plan be revised to show no overhang into the landscape areas (9).
32. Please provide sizes of trees at the following minimum ratios as required by the City-Wide
Design Guidelines: 10% @ 36" box, 30% @ 24" box, and 60% @ 15 gallon (10).
BUILDING DEPARTMENT- Mark Harold, Deputy Building Official, 694-6439
dd. Curb raFRps may not onoroaeh intc aoccssiblo parking spaoos. Ploaso reviso plans te rofleot
a ollrb cut conditien te J3re'lisc aoooss to parl'.ing spaoe. California Building Cedo Sootien
1129B.4.2.
34. Plaase provide a oloar idontifioation of all proposes J3roporty Iinos for the J3rejoot.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT- Annie Bostre- Le, Assistant Engineer, 694-6411
R:\C U P\2003\03.0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doc
4
The following comments and requirements shall be complied with and submitted for review and
approval prior to our setting the Conditions of Approval for the above project.
Please revise the Site Plan to show the following:
35. A legible vicinity map
213. /\ecurate metes ans Beund
37. Label all easements with dimensions
38. Limits of Flood zone
39. Pad and finishes fleer elevation
Please revise the Conceptual Grading Plan to show the following:
40. A legible Vicinity Map
11. fill in Applicant's Name and adsross inferr'Ration
42. .'\eeurate Legal seseril3tion in the title blook
43. Accurate Assessor Parcel Numbers
44. Clarify the limits of the Flood Zone
This project may be conditioned for the following:
45. Permission to drain into the drainage easement
46. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing City right-of-way for the sidewalk on
Enterprise Circle West along property boundary and drive approach.
47. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
48. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
49. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU- Jim McBride, Deputy Fire Marshall- 694-6405
All questions regarding this letter shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau staff. A Fire
Department representative has reviewed the above referenced case and has the following
informational comments and corrections:
SITE PLAN
50. Provide site plan iR engineoring soale fe 20, 20, of 10.
51. FDC(s) shall be located within 50ft. of a public hydrant, on the right of way, and a minimum
of 40ft. away from the building (and grouped if multiple appliances). Show on resubmittal.
52. Some turning radi are inadequate.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eir Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doc
5
53. Provide Fire Department access to within 150 ft. of the surface of all portions of the
buildings.
54. Show tho location and sizo of any aboveground or underground luol tanks, 'Naste oil !ank~,
and LPG tanks.
55. Show all bus, loading, unloading, and delivery zones.
56. Show the types and widths of all gates. Manual and electronic gates shall be provided with
the Knox Rapid Entry System.
FLOOR PLANS
57. Shsy/Iscation of liro sprinklor riser. (Note, riser must be locates in a separate roem 'Nith
siroct accoss te tRS sutGide ef building.
58. Shew location of firo alarm control panel (Note, mUG! be lecated with firo sprinklor riGor).
59. Short property line setbacks may require protected/rated walls and or openings.
TCSD- Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator- 694-6480
The TCSD has reviewed the Development Plan for the aforementioned project and has the following
conditions of approval.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
60. The deyoloperGhall contact the Cily'G IranchiGod solid waste Raulor lor dispsGal of
sonstruction dobris. Only tho City's franchiGoo may halJl ssnstruction dobris.
91. All paril'lIaYG including aroas within tho RO'N, foncing, landssaping and on site lighting shall
be maintained by ths proporty owner or an ostalllisRes maintenance assosiation.
92. The Multi lJSO Trails and Bil(o'....ays Master Plan identifios a Class a l3isycls lane, '....hich is
designated by signago only, en Entorprise Circle 'Nest and Enterprise Cirslo South. The
stroet iFflprsveR'lent plans sRall inslj,jse tRO signago and tho sevsloper shall provide.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
9a. TRo doyoloper shall pro'lide TCSD vorifioation of arrangomonts made with tho City's
franchise solis '/Iaste haj,jlor for disposal of ssnstruction dobris.
In summary, this letter serves to notify you of the results of the DRC meeting. Upon resubmittal
please submit 5 copies of the site plan, landscape plan, floor plans and elevations as a set along
with a response letter to the outstanding issues. If you have any questions regarding this letter,
please call me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Rick Rush
Associate Planner
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 2.doc
6
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive PO Box 9033 Temecula California 92589-9033
(909) 694-6400 FAX (909) 694-6477
January 29, 2004
W. Dean Davidson Architect
40023 Myrtlewood Court
Murrieta, CA 92562
SUBJECT: Third DRC Comments for Planning Application Case No. PA03-0429 for Enterprise
Circle Business Park located at corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise
Circle West
Dear Mr. Davidson:
Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you regarding the above-referenced project. As a result
of the Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting held on January 13, 2004, the following list
of changes still need to be made and resubmitted for staff's review.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT-Rick Rush, Project Planner 694-6400
General Comments
1. The I3rel3esed projeot is looated wilhin the BUGinoss Park (BP) zoning diGtriel. Per tho
DO'/olepR'lent Cedo roqllireR'lents for thiG zoning Elistriet all .....arei'lellsing llSeG require a
sondilienal llGe perR'lit. In ordor te 1'.0013 l'IarohouGing a l3ar:t of the applioation YOllr
DO'/olel3R'1ent Plan application R'lust bo shangod to a Conditional UGO Permit. PloaGo
provide Glaff with a lottor from the property ewner re(JllOGlin€l 'hiG ohango. A letter will need
10 be pro\'ided prior to any resllbmittals.
2. Please be advised that the Development Code does not permit certain types of
manufacturing within the BP zoning district. Staff has attached a copy of the Development
Code section (Chapter 17.08-7) for your information.
3. Tho minirflllm roqllirod landsoaped opon spaco for tho BP zoning diGtrict is 28~C Tho
I3roposed projeot iG only providing 2g~C
1. Tho pUBlio hoaring notice pacl,<ot dOOG not meot the requireR'lent fer 20 difforent property
ewnors. This will neod te be eorrocted prior to Geheduling the item for public hearing. The
pllBlis hearing notise paske! was sent bask November 5, 2003.
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 3.doc
Site Plan
6. Tho proposod €lito plan do os not indisato an aroa dosignatod for loading for oithor building.
Staff is awaro of TaBlo 17.24.0eO locatod in tho Dovoiopmont Codo, which pro'/idos a
minim<lm numb or of loading spaooEl roqlJirod por blJilding. Tho table indicateEl tRa! Buildingo
leElEl than 10,000 Elq<laro feet do not roquire a loading spaoo. Ho'tlo'lor, tRe tOll! peRien !3ives
tho ability to roquire spaoos to adoquatoly seFVe the <lse. It Fias Boen dotorminod by staff that
tho prElpesed buildings usos (.,..<arehe<lsing and man<lfaot<lring) will roquiro loading spacos at
oach building. Please indioate at least one dosignated loading area (ton foot .....ide, t\\<enty
five foot long, and fourtoon foot of unobstruotod vertical hoight) per building not to bo visiblo
from the publio right of way.
e. Tho Do\'olopmont Codo roquiros outdoor areas dosignatod for omployoo gathoring aroas
suoh as plazas, oourtyards and gardon aroas. Thoso aroas should inoludo cO'o'orod outdoor
aroas for tho omployoos to utilizod yoar round. ThiEl is not boing proposod as a part of tho
applioation; ploaso roviso tho €lito plan to moot this roquiromont. Staff has concerns with
the proposed location of the outdoor areas. Staff recommends relocating both areas
as discussed in the DRC meeting.
7. The Development Code encourages design features that will contribute to the design
character of the entire site. The following examples are provided in code: ceremonial
entrance drives, enhanced visitor parking areas, decorative pedestrian plazas and
walkways, focal landscape treatments, and site sculptures. Please revisit the site plan to
see if any of these design features could be incorporated into the project. The applicant
provided decorative paving; please provide details of the paving.
g. In roviowing tho site plan it appoam that thom is enly ono light polo boing proposod. Ploaso
Be advised that tho DO'/olopmont CeEle roquiros a minimum Illumination of one foot oandlo
aoross parking aroas and a twe feet sandia at ontranoos. Lighting shall bo consistont '....ith
tho roquiromonts ostablisheEl BY Ri'/omide Ceunt)' to roduoo impaots upon the Mount
Palomar Obsorvatory. Provido all propoElod light J3eles not enly on tho €lito plan but also on
tho landscapo plan for ooordination '!lith any propesod landsoaping. This Gomment
appears to ha'/e been addressed with the 10Gation of mere light standards on the site
plan, but not on the landsGape plan. This will need to be done prior to the next
submittal.
O. BioYGle spaoos Elhall bo roquirod at a KltO of 1 bioyole Elpace for o'/ory 20 '/ohicle !Jpacos
roquirod. Tho biGyole spaoos oan oithor be ClaEls Ilool{Qrs or Class II raokEl (Devolopment
Cede Sootien 17.24.040Fl band 0 dofinos ClaEls I and Class II).
10. Motoroyole spaooEl Elhall bo requirod at a minimum of one metercyole spaco por ovory
twont)' five roquired parking spaooEl for tho entiro site. This requiromont is not boing met.
11. Staff Ras oonoornEl '/lith tho podoEltrian walkways being provided te Both buildingEl (not tho
.^.D/\ roquirod path of travoll. Tho elimination of tRese areas FRay pro'iiee tho opportunity te
provido moro landsoapo along tho front olevations of the buildings whilo still providing
aOOOSEl to the individual Eluitos.
12. Tho €lito plan calls out two future FRenumont signs. Seotion 17.2g.440B allow!J only one
m\llti tonant monUFRont Elign per oontor. PIQa!JQ rovi!Je the site plan te indioato the location of
the FRQnuFRont Elign.
13. Please be advised that the proposed buildings wi/I be required to submit a comprehensive
sign program per Section 17.28.080 (a separate Sign Program application will need to be
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir ~usiness Park\DRC Letter 3.doc
2
submitted). This comment was not addressed, if the comment is not addressed staff
will condition the project to have a sign program approved prior to any building
permits.
14. Staff has sensorns with location of the trash onolosuro noarost te Buileling "I'.". In this
iocation tho trash truck will nood to baek I,Jp approximatoly 1 dO foet boforo being able te tl,Jrn
arol,Jns. The trash enGlosure was reloGates, next to the outdoor patio area. Please
re\'isit this issue.
15. '.^.'hen a parl(ing spaoe is dirootly aEljasent to a landsoapod aroa, tho plan calls for a two foot
ovorhang into tho landscaped aroa. Ploaso be advised that tho aroas .....horo the vohioles
over hang will net bo oounted towardo the ovemlllandooapo reEllliromont. Please eliminate
alllansscaping within the I\\'o foot o'Jerhang from the landsoape perGentage on both
the site plan andlandsGape plan.
1 e. Ploase Elorrect the net lot aroa for 80th paroels.
17. Please corroot the F I'.R.
Elevations
18. The Development Code requires that long un articulated walls surfaces be avoided. Wall
planes should not extend in a continuous direction for greater than fifty feet without an offset.
The east and south wall elevation on Building "A" is not meeting this requirement as well as
the west and south elevation on Building "B". Please revise the project to meet this
requirement. This can be accomplished by using contrasting vertical and horizontal
elements to break the visual mass of the fat;:ade into smaller areas.
19. Staff has concerns with the proposed parapet rooflines. As proposed the rooflines do not
create any opportunity for providing shadows. The Development Code requires a variety of
shapes and forms including roof overhangs be provided to create shadowing.
20. The project as proposed does not provide a creative entry treatment for the buildings. The
code suggests utilizing canopies, awnings, cornices or atriums to meet this concern.
21. Tho proposed windo'l,' si;!eo anel shapeo are 'lOry similar. The Development Coele
onoeurageo varling tho oiza anel shape ef winse.....o. Staff rooommenels rooesoing tho
winelew6 anel net bringing the storefront glass all the 'tIay to the floor. 1'.160, ploaso eXI"lero
eptions in previeling natural lighting inte tho proposoel roar area for eaoh building. As
I"reposed ne '.'.'inse'Ns othor than the storefront glass is boing previeleel.
22. Pleaso verify that tRO proposeel roll lip doem will bo mellnteel on the intorior ef the bllileling
per Developmont Codo reqlliremonts.
Landscape Comments
Bold comments refer to site planning or grading issues. Non-bold comments refer to landscape
issues. The numerals in parentheses coordinate with the numerals on the redline landscape plan
attached.
2d. A minimllm 25~(' of tho €lito is rOEll,Jiroel to bo landsoapod in tho BP zono. Tho applioant
I"ropo€les only 20~<" Ploaoo provido additionallanelscapo aroa as roquiroel to moot ooelo
roquirements (1).
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eir Business Park\DRC Letter 3.doc
3
24. It appear!) that the existing trees are R'lislabelea. Pleaoo oorreot (2).
25. .^.s J3lannea, one existing large Peppor tree will nood to bo reR'levea. It is FOcommondod that
thio Pepper be oaved ans tRe site plan be revised to oave it in place (d).
26. Coae reEluireo peaeotrian plazas and walks vlitR !'llanting, decorativo !'laving and benches as
l'Iell as eutdoor aroas for eR'l!'lleyee lunsheo. Please proviae fer tRooe reqlJiremonts. TRe
outdoor lunoh area should be lesates so that it is within a ploaoing onvironment ana will eo
shaded in oummor (1).
27. Coae requireD lansssapin!l to be provided alon!llen!l expansoG of fonoing and.'er walls.
Code alse reEllJiroG large wall masses to bo ooreenea/broken lJp. It is rocomFRenaoa that
Builsing ',I'.' bo setbaol< a miniFRuR'l ef 5' from the east proper-ty line te allow Gpaoe for
lanaooapinl'l. TRe lanaGoaping GhelJla inollJde evorgroen troeG ana shrlJbs to soroen this 2
dimonsionaleast elovation. PleGGo provide for thio reqlJiroFnent (5). Staff Ras determined
that this semment still a!'lplies. Re'Jise the site and lamlssape plan te shew this
requirement is being met.
28. /'.lIlJtilitios aro reqlJirea te bo soreenoa. The applioant will be roquired to she'.... ana label all
utilitieo on eonGtrlJotien landsoape dm.....ings ana prevido appropriato ooreonin!l. Pleaso
provide a d' slear zone aFOuna fire oheoll doloctors as FOquiroa by the Fire DepartR'lont
befere starting the soreen. Please group utilitioG together in order to roduGO intrusion.
Soreoning ef utilities Is net te look like an after theught. Plan !'llanting boaG and aOGign
arouna utilities. Please alGe looato all light pol os on plans ana inslJre that there are no
, oonflicts with trees (6).
29. Street trees are reEluirea at the rate of one per dO' ef street frentage. Please proviae street
trees as reEluiroa (7).
dO. Coae requiros a minimum 5' wiath planter to be installos at tho porimoter of all parking
areas. Curbs, wallIS, eto. are not te Infringo on this area. The parl<ing let surb appearG to be
Installoa insiae the 5' lansssapo area along the south proper:ty line. PloaGo revise the site
layout as roquires te j:lfeviao tho full 5' wiath landsoape area (8).
d1. The €lito plan !'lropeGos a2' oar overhang inte tRelanaGcapo aroa to tho south and '/Jest. It is
resemmonaea that oars not overhang tRe reEluirea 5' landGcape area. It is reoommonded
that tho €lite plan be revised te sRe-:: ne everhang inte the landscape areas (9).
d2. Please previae sizos of trees at tho fellewing minimum m.tios ao requires ey tRO City 'Nido
Design GuisolinoG: 10% @ d6" box, dO~(' @ 21" eel(, ana 60% @ 15 gallon (10).
BUILDING DEPARTMENT- Mark Harold, Deputy Building Official, 694-6439
dd. Cure Famps may not onoreach into aooossible parl<ing spacoG. PloaGo reviso plans to reflect
a ourb cut oondition to proviae aOOOSG to parking spaoe. California Building Codo Seotion
1129B.0.
34. Ploase proviae a clear iaontification ef all prepesed property lines for the projoct.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT- Annie Bostre- Le, Assistant Engineer, 694-6411
The following comments and requirements shall be complied with and submitted for review and
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cif Business Park\DRC letter 3.doc
4
approval prior to our setting the Conditions of Approval for the above project.
Please revise the Site Plan to show the following:
35. ,^. logiblo 'Jisinity R1ap
36. i\ssurato molos and bound
37. Labol all easen:Jonts '....ith dimonsions
3ll. LiR1its of Flood zono
39. Pas ans Finished floor olovation
Please revise the Conceptual Grading Plan to show the following:
10. .^. le€liblo Vioinity Map
41. Fill in !'.pplioant's NaR10 and address information
12. ,^,oouralo Logal dosoription in tho titlo blook
13. !\osuFate J'.ssossor Parool NUFRbors
11. Clarify tAg IiFRits of tho Flood lon~
This project may be conditioned for the following:
45. Permission to drain into the drainage easement
46. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing City right-of-way for the sidewalk on
Enterprise Circle West along property boundary and drive approach.
47. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
48. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
49. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU. Jim McBride, Deputy Fire Marshall- 694-6405
All questions regarding this letter shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau staff. A Fire
Department representative has reviewed the above referenced case and has the following
informational comments and corrections:
SITE PLAN
50. Provido sito plan in onginooring soalo fo 20, 30, of 10.
51. FDC(s) shall be located within 50ft. of a public hydrant, on the right of way, and a minimum
of 40ft. away from the building (and grouped if multiple appliances). Show onsite plan on
resubmittal.
52. Some turning radi are inadequate.
53. Provido FiFO Dopartmont accoss to wilhin 150 fl. of tho surfaco of all portions of tho
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise eir Business Park\DRC Letter 3.doc
5
buildin€!s.
54. Show tRe lecation ami size of any abevoground or underground fuol tanks, wasto oil tanks,
ans LPG tanks.
55. Show all bus, loading, unloading, and delivory zl3nes.
513. Show tho types ans widths ef all gatos. Manual and olootmnic gatoc chall bo providod with
tho Knox Rapid Entry Syctom.
FLOOR PLANS
57. Show looatien ef fire cprinkler ricer. (Note, ricor muct bo looated in a ceparate reeR'! .....itR
diroot aeeesc to the outside of builcling.
58. She'....looation of fire alarm control panel (Note, muct be located with firo sprinl(lor ricor).
59. 8Rort property line setbal3kc may roquire protocted/ratod wallc and or openings.
TCSD- Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator- 694-6480
The TCSD has reviewed the Development Plan for the aforementioned project and has the following
conditions of approval.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
130. The developer chall contaot the City's franchisod solid .....aste haul or for dicpooal of
eenctruction debris. Only tho City's franchicoe may haul construotion sebric.
131. .'\11 parkways including areas within tho ROW, fenoin€!, landccaping and on cite lighting shall
813 R'!aintained by the proporty owner er an ostablished R'!aintenance assooiation.
132. The Multi uso Trails ans Bikoways Mastor Plan identifios a Class d Bicyclo lana, 'Nhioh is
docignated by signago only, on Entorprise Cirolo \^lost ans Entorpriso Cirolo South. Tho
stroet improvemont plans shall inoluso the signage and the clo'lolopor cRail previde.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMITS
13:3. Tho Eloveloper chall previse TCSD vorification of arran€!8R'!ents made with tho City'c
franohise selis waste hauler for sispesal of conctruotion dobric.
In summary, this letter serves to notify you of the results of the DRC meeting. Upon resubmittal
please submit 5 copies of the site plan, landscape plan, floor plans and elevations as a set along
with a response letter to the outstanding issues. If you have any questions regarding this letter,
please call me at (909) 694-6400.
Sincerely,
Rick Rush
Associate Planner
R:\C U P\2003\03-0429 Enterprise Cir Business Park\DRC Letter 3.doc
6
L
ITEM #3
,
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date of Meeting:
March 17, 2004
Prepared by: Matt Harris
Title: Associate Planner
File Number PA03-0707
Application Type: Extension of Time
Project Description:
A Second Extension of Time for Planning Application No. PAOO-0276, a
Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a 15,883 square
foot office building on a .64 acre site located at the southwest knuckle
of Enterprise Circle North (APN 909-282-013).
Recommendation:
(Check One)
i:8J Approve with Conditions
o Deny
o Continue for Redesign
o Continue to:
o Recommend Approval with Conditions
o Recommend Denial
CEQA:
(Check One)
i:8J Categorically Exempt
(Class) 15332
o Negative Declaration
o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:\E01\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\STAFF REPORT. doc.
I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant: Bruce G. Keeton Trust
\
Completion Date: ' December 10, 2003
General Plan Designation:
Business Park (BP)
Zoning Designation:
Business Park (BP)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial
Bank
Office
Industrial
Lot Area:
.64 Acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio 15,883/.57
Landscape Area/Coverage 5,995/22%
Parking Required/Provided 39 Spaces / 34 Spaces
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The Planning Commission approved Planning Application PAOO-0276 on December 20, 2000.
The expiration of this approval was December 20, 2002. The first time extension was approved
retroactively on March 19, 2003. Prior to the expiration of the first extension, the applicant
applied for a second extension of time. This second time extension request was submitted to
the Pianning Department on December 10, 2003.
i:8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
(or)
o 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff.
R:\EOT\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\STAFF REPORT-doc.
2
o 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet " (Attachment A) has been completed and
staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-
wide Design Guidelines, the ~ Specific Plan, PDO, and the Development Code.
(or)
o 2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and
indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing a two story, 15,883 square foot office building referred to as the
Keeton Building on a .64 acre site. Shared points of ingress and egress to the streets are at the
northwest and southeast corners of the site providing access to this site and the bank to the
south. Parking is provided adjacent to the building and a single row of parking is provided in
front of the building parallel to the western entry drive aisle.
As calculated by the City's parking standards for office use there should be 39 parking spaces
provided on the site. As designed, the applicant is proposing 34 parking stalls. As a part of the
original Planning Commission approval, the applicant requested and was granted a minor
exception for the required parking requirements.
Additionally, the applicant was granted a FAR increase and a Minor Exception for a reduction of
a building setback.' The total square footage of this building, based on the outside dimensions,
puts the floor area ratio (FAR) at .57 while the Development Code has a target ratio set at .40
FAR. The Development Code requires a to foot building set back from the street under the
Business Park zoning. A minor exception allows for a 15% reduction that permits a setback of 8
Y2 feet and the applicant proposed 9 feet. The building's encroachment into the setback involves
architectural relief features and the second floor overhang.
The project as proposed complies with the City's Development Code and the findings for a
Development Plan. However, during review ot'the time extension request, the Public Works
Department requested that one additional Condition of Approval be added to address the
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) approved by the City Council in July 2003 (See
Draft Condition No.39). All other previous conditions of approval have remained the same.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
i:8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 32,
In-Fill Development)
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
The project, as conditioned, is consistent with all applicable City ordinances, standards,
guidelines, and policies. The project is compatible with surrounding developments in terms of
, design and quality, and staff recommends approval of the second time extension as originally
conditioned along with noted modifications/additions.
R:\E01\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\STAFF REPORT.doc.
3
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal, an office building, is consistent with the land use designation and policies
reflected in the Business Park (BP) land use standards in the City of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) contained in the
City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to
be physically suitable for the type and density of officelcommercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mf. Palomar
Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and
building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health
and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for,
and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and
welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Originally Approved Plans - Blue Page 5
2. PC Resolution No. 2004-_- Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
R:\E01\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\STAFF REPORT.doc.
4
J
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ORIGINALLY APPROVED PLANS
R:\EOT\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park: Office Center\STAFF REPORT.doc.
S
,;'1.
. ...L"
::~:.~'J.~_:5;:::~;'~;;:1:r;, ,~,~I:~~~{~~:~~~MJk~~~11W{iittt~J~;~~~~.~{ii~:-~1~~~~!W.~~~~t;f::::;}j::~'.):,)'.; ,L~' -"~.~;i'<: >~\:'- ',;.',', '
\ .
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
I '
PLANNING APPLICATION NO, 00-0276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A I t
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE. December 2q, 2000
I
R:\D P\00-027B Keeton Truetl5taff report 27BpaOO.doe
I 21'
,
VICINITY MAP
, /,"::'X~,,; ,:it~',1:2:~f.~;:~:~~f1~~~:t;2:~~;;:;;';;~~i;~l;;g:N)~tt\:>:~}J1~>E~gt\\; ~ '. ~~';:
" ("\
"i',"
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
..^._....^..^__;; ^ " ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ..;.. .:..;r--"~ .-' -, . .~~~~.- '1.. .~. )( ~\- ,--
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ " " " ^ ^ ^ " ^ " '.':' ,.,.. .' '~. ~
^ ^ '^ ^ ^ .... '^ ^ ^ ^ A ^ ^ r ...... ""-",," ~ " ..".
^ " ^ .. ^ ^ ^ .. ^ ^ ^ "" ~. .......,~. ~. ., ........ / \
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ A ^ ^ ^ Al I""" ~ ~
^ ^ ^ II. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^.... ^ ,....."".. t-C ~~.... "L:--
..^",,^,,^^^^,,^,,^^^,,^^^^^ ^^ ,,, ':.::.:::'.~m"" PROJECT SITE W...
^ ^ " ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ "" ",,'. ~~,
^ ^Qliv^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .."1'.....'... :'\~~ . . . . . . '-
, ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' ",,,, A. J ......~
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ,.. ,"'...... ~ . . . ., ...
,^^^^^^^^ """,~", ~~ ~
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ A ....) '" "'! Y ~ I: ]. .,
. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^,r' " A. A. A. 1 1 ." ....
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^... ... ....'\ '.."..";; ..'\'" ~....V .., .......
. ^ ^ ... ^ ^ ^ ^ """, ~~~ ' , \.~ y ~
^ II. ^ II. A ^ II. ........".... j '\.., :'. W::, ~. . . .
. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ' """,. J. ' ..:...:. ~: r,,]
^^^^^ ^ ... .... .. .:.:. ". . ....~ ,>-(.
. ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ " " , , , , ,,,. ........... V ....
^^^^ ^ ....... ,.. ...:': :.: .. ,.:.. .....
. ^ ^ ^ A""'" "f"" .':''':''~.. ," ~
^ ^ ^.. ^ ^ .., .... ...... ....... .. 'I.;~", .., ." .
. ^ ^ ^ ^.""" ",("" .-:-'-:-. ."+": ", . ., . ~
It It ^ It ...,..., '" '\ .... ~.." . . . : . : . : . .U... . .....
, ^ ^ ^ """ "" " ..:...:... ...:..':..':.. '" "'C ~
^ It ^ ^ "".. ..,........., :.~. ....... ." ., ., . .
~ ^ ^ ^t~"" """. ...1i3I ...:. :...:...:. . Y r.ttilf.
^ ^ ^ .... . ..... .'. :ol!.!.,.!.'! ......... . . ...,
to ^ ^ lit .I" ."", ..:....:. ..... . p..;
..110 ^ ^ ....^ ~;;;;;; ;;;;;, '..l.:.j.:,l':"j ..l.:~: '.l,:.j: ....1.:.1.. " ' .. ~ -fi ..~
.."',.^ ^,/ ""o,..., ".-,",",',"," :...:.i.:.:: :.:.:.:.:.:.....:.:.:.:.::;Z.!,:.' J'" ~~: ... A.A
^ ^ ^ .. . ..... !.! :.VF./...!.!.'...!'!.: /~. . .~..<lv..,.V!~...... V"'<lj
'II ^ ^""", ",,,, ......... .. ~fl;F...... ....... .... ........ A ~"lI rol8l!
.. ^ ^ ,,,... , """ "...",.:.,:.... I. ;.:..,.-::..:,.... . \.""!"
_ _ . . _ . . .. .. . l . --......! ..._...._....11../ . . .A. .b. A A~ .b. A -
~~B I ~~~
DESIGNATION - BP (Business Park\
~OOoOoOQOOoOoOoOoOoOoOoQ 00 ..i :':: , . .m. ..r\ \ 7 ~\
>000000000000000000000000.. Oo,,~~~';; ~'Io4:f. . /~'\, ^ ..".
~OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO 00 ....... ~ Jl~ l-I.:L ~y :-..:\
)000000000000000000000 00.,.. ':::.:::.~ ..~~. PROJECT SITE ::-;~
)OoOo~OoOoOoOoQ 00 ':::'::.. '':'" ,......~ ""'- ... .~.... .
>0000<)'0'1000000000 00 :.'" , , . .. ~ I' v'I' , . . . :-...
>0000000000000 00 ::::,::.'. ~. ., .' . ., -........ "
)00000000000 <>:.. ':.:.~.:~' '':.. :.+~. . -y Fi<. .~:--
)0000000000 <> :.:::.:.. '~~~'/..:.. '.: "'~' ., ,., .' lI.
)00000000 00, ""''7,/,/''''' ',+'+' . , , . . Z .,
,.... ...,.... , ,..."......., ., I" . ... ... ,,"
>0000000 00 """, , .I'" ;.. '.i...:..' .. ... "
............,... ~,.. '\; ..,.. :.: I . .. : :. .'t....J. .
)000 00 "",1' ''f'''' ":"':'~'.. .....~.~ . .., ......
>0000..1:1'- ,"',",,', """"'Ii" , ',..j...,..,",...... :.:.:.~:.~ ... ... ....:.:1~ "1. . .. ..
"v...... .. .1...... :.: : . :.:.: , r. ..).(~...
>OoOo~jI..Oo "".I, """ ..!...:.. . .'~.. ,.'i'.'!'''!'' .., . .. ~
-- V ..,..., "8..~........,J :':':.", ..:':':' .
)00 - "" , ,. ....'.....f;;4'. ..... .......... ;l:\I . ~ . . ',..0
>Oo,~l~o~ "$-:"; ;Jl!f,': ,;, ,,'..1.:.:. !,:.! ,~:..: L:,j.:.:: l: :...j.,.' ., :.'/: '.' '.' -fi' .>-<,').,j~';R.
,...... ...... :,1:':'. : . :: ':.:. :.: . ~ "I'
> 0 ~ '00 ,'1''' 1" ,,1" , I' ............... .. ....... ....... ........... I"'( As
>00 ')'Q 'S:::; 'Jf.~;;;;; .... I". .:: :.:.:.:.~' :.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:'.. .~""'~ ::::
po.... .. ,........ :..,: . i::.i!iI '.:.:.: . Y"'\llIf T"W
> 00 "", "", ..;...:...: ,...:. ;"~.:.. ..., .;...:..' . ',,' A.A. \db"A..
,.......... ........ ..:.;.h' :'!'.~: !.:.... :.... ~ YV Vy. .. ;; .. ,.I"'" "", ...........~... ............1 ............ "'. ~ v ..A.....A...A;::......
EXHIBiT C !
DESIGNATION - BP /Buslness P~rk)
i
PLANNING APPLICATION NO, 00.0276 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE ~ December 20; 2000
, ,
;
GENERAL PLAN
I
R:\D P\00-0276 Keeton TnlstlStalf reporl276paOO.doc
I
(
22
i'
a
~
.",1'
L
I '\
CITY OF TEMECULA
r-
r-' ."'\'~-
.--~~~~.
I
I-
FRONT ELEVATION
nr..:..-
. ~
,
1
I
,o:I!PI~-JlMl!i'_~_.1!!!..
~
REAR ELEVATION
...........
~.=.
'''!!~~
,
,
;
I
\I I
,
,
,
!
I
!
~
" :
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. O(l-'l276 (Development Plan>
EXHIBIT E ! I
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE t December 20,2000
I
R:ID PIOO-0276 Keeton TrusllSlafl report 276paOO.doc
!
SIDE ELEVATION
V.l..I\....
SIDE ELEVATION
VI..II...
24
.
I _+f!iJr......,.......
I
~,...f.#.~
I \......u,.,_...,
.,.tt'.df.'.
I
ELEVATIONS
I
II
/i""".
.....:....
( \
'4,
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
~
8
I
J..::..:.~.~:,
I
I .1'11111$:\ I III!
'~________--L_____-'-':' ___________~
l ,
I ':
~
:.~'::""". . - .:',
~ I
- ,
... 1
;' i .
. "
- I'
IJJJlilWo D11
i
,
~
~ i
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. OO~276 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F ~,
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE i December 20; 2000
~
R:\D PlOo-0276 Keelan TrusllStaff report 276paOO.doc
!
\
LANDSC~E PLAN
I
25
)...,
I
/" \.
.
.'
CITY OF TEM,ECULA
i
i
,
,
\
\
c." . <,>v'
'I ~vvv
!, '1rJ-A-,&",if /v
~_ CJ'.~'" v
\ ~. 1: >:J9-
1 ",-1>-~_
-, ..Q::ouj ,,---
~.._ r~'~. _..... _
..., ,.''__ '. - -. .. . - ----..';,;. ft...._~..""'--,~_ ...---_......~.L
t~r:l~llQtl . -" -'~~'_ I .-. ".-.. ..
_ Ii. "'. .-.-.-..--.-. ..~-....- --. to. .. "-'-"--
{~~"J. ,~:-...._\)l"~\;ifI.I"'~"I:".':.l"W~''''__\ ~tJlIITlI'''''1(lI I -~_
---~ '-. ~ ~
f; --- ";~7. FiU.rKrBCC ',:.!,.
~ --- , .~
I~\,,,..,, - ---
.:.', t.t~tr~.,.P --) ) I.'l' U f't K'f;ttt.. .., ~. . I
~..~ j ~...:'". (Q..~ /~.. I ...... ~"'J~ DlSfrstwar-/
~... _..;L___ _ ,,~'-' {.. ~. '<1:" ,..11." D.... 11''' I
......---- . .'......,. ffi'- --.--.-'--- .X.' ~./.-."..~ '.".tUs.""
"....<r_....... "'1.<' .' ~ _..,_~~ '~ .- --... \;,i ...~...
.,,:\:'..." ,---".". ....' ..- .'.;,., ,. ,.,.... J"" - ", - -'" -.... ------"""- ;jt' "'," """
~. . . : ~__ _.t~_.~ ,..,) '.. "' '. ... ,_ I , - ".-.... _. -.
/ ..' .....,.W'I --........ .o.J.. ~.,. "ill, 'J.:l"'N' ..... .TCi.:.;..:...'........-
;;{'~ '~;;~- ~ .' ...... Il'I ;1' ',~;:\; -WJf\ :,~''',.r._;';r\.' ..~:~f-'-.:...~..,~.;:::;
',.b"," ,/ I' -->.,.1- ,- . l.:. ..,.' '. !
./.'. .;_ ..~, .' :.J ... __ . ,..." :-~. ..,''',!: " I
'~:J I r.!lotll'l.,.:....'. ~ ''C.'..Il:" ,:!;,/~~ -'";,,,., 'I
"I w. ~~..(.' \!!..~' '''''', ...~....' -l...~l
I" . ,. it " 'T{l"- .....:1> '
" i ...JU ,i':1 ,I '. " ,1. I
\ \ 't:' II Q; i~~'1 l' CJ ~'
',S u \~ 1 J ,I ,I>
,> ~ ~ i.":j J ; r, ~\ qc,'- ",of-
I~ ""-1 :~~ o~ </)t-'-
'~I';lft ~';tll~l I c ~ ,'1",~~~(;~:~ <i
I l g: !t.:~ll ~ f. -v\.t-~~ \)
: .. ffj...-ttf ~ ~! I::,'
i I' ~:f.t ..l:..:~~',... R~t.",'o.,',. 'I
j '~.l "...', ;9.'. :J'). I
I ....~, '..... :;... ::"'l"~' ,... -\
I "~f >:'-:'.~ ~:.. " ..--..-..,-'
.l~':" ' ~~ .i!... ,,:-;ll
'1.\ . '4'~~
, ?'~
---J.
\
---
,'"
'Iv" V
.A }Jv
'1U' ~~v c/
t~ \)9-
"I .
nGf.,,"fM
......
. .
31/'
28' '.
!:~ " , I
i
r,
!
I
"
II
i i
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 001'0276 (Develo~ment Plan>
EXHIBIT D I'
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE .;December20,[2000
I',; I
I ' ~
'[:1
I,.,
iV"
;r,.';
Ii:,
I ~ ~'I
...
U'
. ,," ~ v </)-3>
,?c,\. if'l) <,' ot-\.
&~ \)9- ~"'~
1) "t-~~ v~
~,\.
",-1>
PRf:'PARFO B~
MARKHAM .!Ie ASSOCIA ITS
111lO_1IcoI-~,M
",,",*-CdIInio9l59ll
lIiIIIW-lIIll .lIiIIIW-lI1I'"
, i" \ I
: .... ~-, I
....--I
,
.~
- --- n -f'..{-
Ib."\
.1'\ ,'I
<?J~ c.\. ",c, /
~ I q if <:;
~ o~~ ,,<:;'"
I 1: ~~
,,'r'
I
I
>D'
I~'
:ro'
I
SITE PLAN
I
~
R:ID PIOO-0276 Keeton TrustlStafl report 276paOO.doc
23
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_
R:\E01\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\STAFF REPORT.doc.
6
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0707 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF
TIME) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-0276
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A
15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING (KEETON
BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013.
WHEREAS, Keeton Construction, filed Planning Application No. PA03-0707 (Extension
of Time Application), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on March 17,2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal
Code:
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal, an office building, is consistent with the land use designation and policies
reflected in the Business Park (BP) land use standards in the City of Temecula General
Plan, as well as the development standards for Business Park (BP) contained in the
City's Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to
be physically suitable for the type and density of office/commercial development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
Lighting Ordinance), the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and fire and
. building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and .
other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health
and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for,
and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and
welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant
environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt, Pursuant to Section
15332 class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03.0707 (the Second Extension of Time for
a Deveiopment Plan) to design, construct and operate a 15,883 square foot office building on a
.64 acre lot located at the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North, and known as Assessor
Parcel No's. 909-282-013 subject to Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference made a part hereof.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 17th day of March 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of March, 2004, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
I
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0707
Project Description:
A Second Extension of Time for Planning Application
No. PAOO-0276, a Development to construct, establish
and operate a 15,883 square foot office building on a
.64 acre site located at the southwest knuckle of
Enterprise Circle North.
DIF Category:
Office
TUMF Category:
Non-Residential
Assessor Parcel No.:
909-282-013
Approval Date:
March 17, 2004
Expiration Date:
December 20, 2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Community Development Department. Planning Division the' check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of City's own election, and
hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its
officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against
. the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and
agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of
limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et
seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City
shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought
forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Ccnter\RESO & COA's.doc
5
and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused
portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to
either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be
responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
3. This approval shall be used by the Expiration Date noted above; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or
the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
4. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Planning Department Additionally, the following
criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they
are not placed in prominent locations visible to the public.
b. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans
and electrical plans for verification of acceptable placement of the transformer
and the double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
c. If the limited landscape area between the right-of-way and the building make
screening difficult or ineffective the Director of Planning may request more
stringent screening methods such as screen/retaining walls and/or
undergrounding of the utility/mechanical equipment.
d. All compact size off-street parking spaces shall be converted to standard size
parking spaces.
5. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. Those lights shown on the
elevation plan as '1ypical exterior building lighting" shall be a decorative type
complimentary to the building. Details of these lights shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for review prior to installation.
6. All parking lot lights and other exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans
submitted to the Department of Building and Safety lor plan check approval and shall
comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
7. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Planning Department. All mechanical and roof-
mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that
purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the
Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening.
8. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "P' (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not
being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the
property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape
R:\E 0 T\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
6
plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of
the developer or any successors in interest. Additionally, the following criteria must be
met prior to development of the project:
a. All trees installed on this site shall be 24-inch box size.
9. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file
with the Community Development Department. Planning Division. Any deviation from
the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
10. The long expanse of the raised center portion of the second floor running the depths of
the building shall be finished with same gazing system used on the exterior of the
building.
Material Color
Windows, doors
Cornices
Stucco first floor projections
Base and column accent veneer
Aluminum frames with dark blue glazing
La Harbra Stucco, Aspen X-23
La Harbra Stucco, Aspen X-23
Red Sand Stone (Morning Glory, Sandstone)
11 . The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The
numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The addresses(s) shall be oriented to the
street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
12. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and
return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files.
13. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
14. An application for a lot merger shall be submitted for the parcels involved with this
project.
15. The applicant shall revise Exhibits "D, E & F", (Site Plan, Elevations, Landscape Plan,
Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and submit five (5)
full size copies.
16. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department . Planning
Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the
approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E",
the colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department .
Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Cenler\RESO & COA's.doc
7
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
18. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and IrrigationPlans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "H1" and "H2," or as amended by
these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants
shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The
plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
19. The applicant or owner of this project shall submit a use and parking ratio synopsis, for
any propqsed tenant(s), for staff's review and approval to ensure that the proposed
tenant use .of the building is compliant with the use and parking ratios approved by the
Planning Commission.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
,
20. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
21. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of
occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been
maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be
released.
22. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The" sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in are and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at
a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
8
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
23. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
General Requirements
24. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work
and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
25. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
26. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
27. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
28. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
29. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
30. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
9
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
31. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
32. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
33. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
34. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
35. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
36. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over.
A.C. paving.
b. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
c. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through undersidewalk drains.
37. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
38. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
10
39. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code an all Resolutions implementing Chapter
15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
40. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
41. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
42. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
43. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical
Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations
and the Temecula Municipal Code.
44. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance
with Palomar Lighting Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All
streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the
Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so
as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public. rights-of-way.
45. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work. .
46. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to
commencement of any construction or inspections.
47. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the buildings is required.
The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of
cross slope, travel slope, stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California
Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). Provide precise grading plan
for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility
48. All buildings shall comply with the applicable provisions of the California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998.
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESQ & COA's.doc
tl
49. Provide the proper number of disabled parking spaces located as close as possible to
the main entries in accordance with California building Code Table 11 B-6. Provide a site
plan as requested above which indicates compliance with this.
50. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
and structural calculations submitted for plan review.
51. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review.
52. Provide house-electrical meters at each building for the purpose of providing power for
fire alarm systems and exterior lighting.
53. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original
signed by an appropriate registered professional.
54. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan
review.
55. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrant to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-
90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
56. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
57. Restroom fixtures, number and type shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
1998 edition of the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter 29.
58. Provide an approved precise grading plan for plan check submittal for checking of site.
disabled accessibility.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
59. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC). California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
60. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM
for a total fire flow of 1900 GPM with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
12
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
61. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
62. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC see 902)
63. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
64. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
(CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
65. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
66. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
67. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch' high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Ccnter\RESO & COA's.doc
13
68. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
69. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
70. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
71. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
72. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
73. All parkways, landscaping, on site lighting and fencing shall be maintained by the
property owner or maintenance association.
74. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
Prior to Building Permit
75. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
OTHER AGENCIES
76. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated July 28, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
77. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 1, 2000, a
copy of which is attached.
R:\E 0 1\2003\03-0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
t4
78. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control's transmittal dated August 4, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant Signature
Date
Applicant Printed Name
R:\E 0 1\2003\03.0707 Ridge Park Office Center\RESO & COA's.doc
15
I
-,..,.....:~\
I
.'./",
! .
Thomas Thomsley, Case Planner
City of TemecJla
Planning Depart,ment
43200 Business!Park Drive.
Post Office Boxj9033 .
Temecula, CA i92589-9033
I
. I
SUBJECf: WATER AVAILABILITY
,
PpRTION OF PARCEL 26 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19582-2
tWN 909-282-013
,
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-276
I .
1-
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
. !
Please be adviJed that the above-referenced property is located within the
,
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water sl;rvice,
therefore, would \be available uPon completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the ptoperty owner. .
I . .
If fire protection is, required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
Pt-ny K. Luuck D
('~,".~, requirements. II .. ..
L1nda.)I.l-.h....~). !I
1t,,"ln., :o;,'C;''''lun'''A.lminiMtnUl\''' " '. ! '. .
""",.-.",,..,..~ Water availability would be contingent upon .the property owner slgnmg an
(". 'II~''''" ("...."ll Agency Agreemep,t that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
Ik,rt Iklot &: lirh.'M'~r UP 11 '.'
(;,or,..r:III....Jl:1,po, ,
If you have any qLestions, please .contact an Engineering Services Represen~tive
. a~ this office. Ii. ... . .
Smcerely, ! ..
i
RANCHO CALIFpRNIA WATER DISTRICT
t .
. .i..L- ..k~
A l..bu<... ~
Steve Brannon, P .E.
li
Development Engreering Manager
OOISB:.UI1\F012-T6\FCF I .
I
i
1
~
I
,
~
J
I~
Rancho
Water
'I
t
I
"
U,.'Ifftl"tUi"''('I'/hI
I . Dnu,cl811 \".liulbt.>r<<
! ftr..~I(iI'nl
,
,
i
!
f;.mrl(e ~I. Woad"
:;,. \'k~ Pt'wlrn..nt
. Ralph Ii. DaU)"
i
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
i
U,. I). H~rman
('lIUho 1o....Ko
Scott A. :\Idnt:-'f't.'
.llof'f1"l..;~' 1_ ~tlnklu
tllti.....r.:
.I~n "'. Ht:r.nllOlr
(i.-n..rlll.:\llItlt\l.",:r
Phfllfp (~ t-'(trtw"
1)i~'1,.r..Jfin"n."..
Tn.;...i..u't.r.
f-:....1Joh..I..t.'motllO
lli......o:...r..rl:::l1ltin...-rinl!
&nnt.th t\ IhoMI)"
1~rw:"r_'ft"I"l'QtiootW
III:: ~llIinl.-nulk't!
i
July 28, 2000 I
;
i
I
I
;
I
I
I
I
,
I
l
I
i
I
I
t ;:.; ~.~ ~:.. '..~ "-7~.~-:-~ :~~]
11"\ ,I,.,
,II! i JUL 3 1 2000 ;.I!.I;I'
tU~.; _-
I . :
18 .. .
_ ....i. -_.....~. "W'_h.. ~.._:
._-~~..... - -~.;
ltulwhu I 'ulUurnin Wllh-r IU.....'...
. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
f
~,
I DATE: August l, 2000
>
t
TO: CITY OF TEMECUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I
. FROM:
RE:
I
R T ,.. pervisor
PLOT PLAN NO. pAOO-0276
i
!
l:
\
I
k . .
l. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PAOO-Q276 and has no
objections, Sanitary sewer nhd water services may be available in this area. . .
. f: . .
~ .
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL for health clearance. the following items are
. .! .
required: . l .. .
~ .
a) "Will-serve" letters fromtbe appropriate Water and sewering agencies.
. I .
i
,
3. Waste Regulation Branch (Wilste ColIection/LEA),
. I
I
t
I
Any current additi~nal requirements not covered can be applicable at time ofBuiiding
Plan review for finltl Department of Environmental Health clearance. ..
Ii' .
1
Ii
{
~
I
I
!
I
I
t'
\
j
,.
I
SM:dr
(909) 955-8980
NOTE:
StandJb.~
~ ~ ~-~::-:'~~--:-~-:-~: ;-~',:
Ii I~'i AUG 0 4 2000 :::;1
b.. .".t
. - . ../(
8;. _._ '__.' ... '.. _____._._...;
-_......_~---:--..._....l
"
i:
"
'-,(~
1995 MARKET STREE
RIVERSIDE, CA 9250
909/955- I 200
909n8S.9965 FAX
_a...._................
\:-~,
, "
G~eral Manager.(;bicf Engineer
\'l'~~~
~\.
. ~~
i
i
\
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
"
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
I .
City ofTemecula I
PI8I'Inlnjl Deoartment \
Post Offioe Box 9033 i
Temecula, California 92589-9033 I
Attention: . '1HOMAS Jh{'J~N<I:,LF..'1
Ladles 8I'Id Gentlemen: I . Re: -E.8 Of) - /) '2... 76
. I . . .
The District does not nonnally recominend conditions for land dlvlslons or other land use cases in Incol"P.!lrated
dtles. The District also does not Plan \!:heCk citY /and use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazald reports for such C8l!es. Distilct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally IImlted
to Items of s~ interest to the DI$trict Including District Master Dralnage Plan facilities, other regional flood
control and dtalnaile facilities which COUld be considered a logical com.llOl18nf or extension of a mas.ter p\l!n SYStem,
and DIstrict Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, Information of a general nalu~ Is
provided. !
The Dis~ct has not reviewed the Pf.O~sed project In detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constltutlil or Imply District approval 0Ij endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health arid safety or any other such Issue: . .
~ This pro/ect would not be Im~acted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor 'ara other facilities of
, , ragloilallnterest proposed. I . .
This project Involves DIstrict Master Plan facilities. The DIstrict will accept ownershJp of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan,check and
'Ins~on will be required for'Dlstrfct acceptance. Plan check, inspection end administrative fees will be
reqUired... ..~ .. ..
. '. ~ . .
This Dt'ofect prl!POSes channels, storm drains 36 Inches or larger In diameter, or other facilities that could be
consldeied regional In nature !104'or a logical extension of the adopted .
Master Dralnage Plan. The DIStrict would consider accepting ownersl!!p ot sucn laClIIUeS on wnuen reqWlSt-
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standlii"ds, and OlStrIct pjen check and Ins~on will
.j'. be required for District acceptare. Plan check,'lnSpectlO~n and admlnlstratl~~ees~will be reqUI~'8tfltlJDI.s VAL.l..d";
.J.L... ThIs project Is located withIn the limits of the District's F;rt ~ I<. ~A fi!lclt Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adop ; app lea Ie fees s e pa a by CiiShIer's
check or money order only to \tfie Flood Control DistriCt prior to Issuance of bull ng or gradil)!l permltsl
whichever comes flrst Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of Issuance of the actua
permit. 'I
GENERAL INFORMATION : .
This project may f!lguire ,a. National Pollutant Discharge i ElimInation System (NPDES) P.8rmlt from the State Water
. Resources Control Boarlf. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given 'until the
,City ~s detennlned that the project hasl~een granted a 'rrmlt or Is shown to be exempt " .
If this prolect Involves a Federal Emergengy Management Agency (FEMAl mapP-8d'flood plain, then the Cltv should
require t1ie applicant to PrOvide 'all ~Ies calculations, plans and other lriformatlon I!l!lulred to meel FEMA
fe!lulrements, and should further require thai the aPPlicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to gradlng, recordation or other flilal approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
" ::U:a::' watercourSe or mapped flJ .plaln 1~llT\Ilact~d by this project. the qny shouid require the aDDllcant to
. obtain a Section 1601/1603 AgreementlfrOm the Callfomla Department of Fish and GameanCl a Cle8l'l Water Act
Section. 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these ag,encles
Incllcating the project Is exem~ from these reqUIrements. :A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certllicetlon
may be required Trom the loCal California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to Issuance of tf)e Corps 404
perm~ 1 '
SIIao..
$1<;:11.
e:
t
,
I
I
c(~:; . .~~.bt
STUART E. MCKl~BIN 1 .
. Senior CIvil Eriglneer
Date: 8 - 4 ~ z;ooo