HomeMy WebLinkAbout06_062 PC Resolution
PC RESOLUTION NO. 06-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT. AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA FROM MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-11) AND ADOPT
SECTIONS 17.22.220 THROUGH 17.22.228 INCLUDING THE
PDO-11 TEXT AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Section 1. Reza Shera of Pacific Group filed Planning Application No. PA05-0234 on
August 8, 2005, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA05-0234 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA05-0234 on November 15, 2006, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and
did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission's Hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council adopt
an ordinance amending the Zoning Map from Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned
Development Overlay (PDO-11) and adopt Sections 17.22.220 through 17.22.228 including the
PDO-11 Text and Development Standards in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A.
Section 5. Environmental ComQliance. The Planning Commission Recommends
that the City Council Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan
based on the Initial Study for Planning Application Nos. PA05-0109 and PA05-0234, which was
prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15072.
Section 6. Findin.ps. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of
Planning Application No. PA05.0234 (Planned Development Overlay), hereby makes the
following findings:
A. The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the land use
designation of the General Plan of the City of Temecula in which the use is located, as shown
on the Land Use Map. The site is physically suitable for the type of uses proposed for the
project site, and the proposed Planned Development Overlay would further the City's long-term
economic development goals.
B. The proposed Planned Development Overlay conforms to the General Plan and
the use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of
the General Plan. The proposed Planned Development Overlay allows for a use that will
provide the diversity of uses desired in the General Plan and will create a balanced community
with additional housing opportunities available to the community.
G:IPlanning\2005IPA05-0234 Mira Loma PDO - Planned Dev OverlaylPlanninglFINAL PC PDO RESOLUTION.doc
1
Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 15th day of November, 2006.
~ cz%'~_L~ .
Ron Guerriero, Chairman
~ ..
ATTEST:
'7)ehhr~ ~.'lAI~ ~
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
,:'" \ \
. jSEAL]
-L
, .
.' .
.,A
~.'.,
"." "
-.
',.- ~
-,- I,....
-.
-'"
STAT60~ ~lIFORNIA )
.'-. COUNTY.-OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
.. ~CITYOFTEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 06.62 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of
November, 2006, by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
~4,~-~~
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:lPlanning\200SIPAOS.0234 Mira Loma PDO - Planned Dev Ove~ay\PlannlngIFINAL PC PDO RESOLUTION.doc
2
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE 1II0. 06-
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY)
G:lPlanning\200SIPAOS-0234 Mira Loma POD. Planned Dev Ove~ay\Planning\FINAL PC POD RESOLUTION.doc
3
.j
ORDINANCE NO. 06-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCILi OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ZONING~ MAP OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA FROM MEDI~M DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (M) TO PLANNED DfVELOPMENT
OVERLAY (PDO-11) AND ADOPTIN.". SECTIONS
17.22.220 THROUGH 17.22.228 INCLUDING THE PDO-11
TEXT AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS fOR A SITE
,
)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECU1i.A DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
"
Section 1. Reza Shera of Pacific Group filed Planning Application No. PA05-
0234 on August 8,2005, in a manner in accord with the CIty of Temecula General Plan
and Development Code.
,
Section 2. The applications for the Project' were processed and an
environmental review was conducted as required by I~w, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 3. . The Planning Commission of the CiW of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on November 15, 2006, to consi~er the applications for the
Project and environmental review, at which time the City 'staff and interested persons
had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter.
Section 4. Following consideration of the entire record of information received
at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-_, recommending that the City Council
approve a. Planned, Development Overlay to amend the land use designation from
Medium Density Residential (M) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-11) and adopt
Sections 17.22.220 through 17.22.228, including the PDO-11 text and development
standards for property located at 29601 Mira Loma Drive, generally located at the
northeast corner of Mira Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road.
Section 5. On , 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula
held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in
the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.
Section 6. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved PA05-0234 subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 7. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have
occurred.
Section 8. The City Council, in approving the Planned Development Overlay
proposed in Planning Application PA05-0234, hereby makes the following findings:
A. The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the land
use designation of the General Plan of the City of Temecula in which the use is located,
as shown on the Land Use Map. The site is physically ~uitable for the type of uses
proposed for the project site, and the proposed Planned Development Overlay would
further the City's long-term economic development goals. .
B. The proposed Planned Development Overl~y conforms to the General
Plan and the use is in conformance with the goals, policiesl programs, and guidelines of
the elements of the General Plan. The proposed Planned iDevelopment Overlay allows
for a use that will provide the diversity of uses desired (n the General Plan and will
create a balanced community with additional housing opportunities available to the
community.
'\
Section 9. Environmental Compliance. Ado)t a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan based on tte Initial Study for Planning
Application Nos. PA05-0109 and PA05-0234, which was )repared pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15072.
Section 10. The City of Temecula City Council h$reby approves the Planned
Development OVE!rlay proposed in Planning Applicationi PA05-0234 to amend the
Zoning Map (Exhibit A) of the City of Temecula from Medium Density Residential (M) to
Planned Development Overlay (PDO-11) and to adopt sections 17.22.220 through
17.22.228 including the PDO-11 text and development standards (Exhibit B) for
property located at 29601 Mira Loma Drive, generally located at the northeast corner of
Mira Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road, in the form attached to this Ordinance as
Exhibit B.
Section 11. Severabilit\(. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a
court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this
Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts
of this Ordinance.
Section 12. Notice of Adootion. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as re~uired by law.
Section 13. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty
(30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 14. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after
its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of
.
the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper
published and circulated in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by th~ City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of , 2006.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 06- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2006,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of ,2006, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
ZONING MAP
G:lPlanning\200SIPAOS-0234 Mira Lema PDO - Planned Dev Ove~ay\PlannlngIFJNAL PC PDO RESOLUTION.doc
4
,
I
I
I
i
'I
It
I
Zoning
';
II
EXHIBIT B
MIRA LOMA PDO.11
G:lPlannlng\200SIPAOS-Q234 Mira Loma PDO - Planned Dev OverlaylPlanning\FlNAL PC PDO RESOLUTION.doc
S
'il
MIRA LOMA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT O,,*~LAY DISTRICT
,
,
17.22i220
TITLE
:,
,',
;<
~ r
JI
I .
17.22.22
I .' ~
Section 17.22.220 through 17.22.228 shall be known a~!"PDO-ll" (Mira Loma
Planr-jed Development Overlay District). (Ord ), I
q
'if
I
1
PURPOSE AND INTENT
I
The Mira Loma Planned Development Overlay District :PDO-ll) is intended to
meet ~e medium density residential criteria contained 1\ the Land Use Element
of the General Plan. These requirements are intended ~rlprovide regulations for
detached single-family residential development within ~e City.
17.22.~ RELATlONSmp WITH ~E DEVEL4~MENT CODE AND
CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDllUNESi i
~H
"
A.' . The permitted uses for th~ Mira Lom~ I Planned Development
Overlay District is contained in section 17.22.226
,
',1
j:
B . Except as modified by the provisions <ilt section 17.22.228 the
following rules and regulations shall,pply to all planning
applications in this area. ' ,
1. The Citywide Design Guidelines that ar~ in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete. '
2, The approval requirements contained m the Development Code
that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete.
1
,I
3. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect
at the time an application is deemed cOlJlplete.
;
I
1~ZLp6 USE REGULATIONS
I -
The Mira Lorna Planned Development Overlay district (iPOO-ll), located along
Mira :Loma Drive and Rancho Vista Road, is intended to provide for the
devel~pment of 62 single-family detached homes on condominium lots on 7.4
acres With a density of 8.4 duj ac. The proposed project is comprised entirely of
priva~e residential land uses designed to enhance housing opportunities,
i
!
Ii
~ ~
, ~ \
consider natural features, incorporate private and comihon open space, private
recreation, and develop a common community theme. lthe project will provide
housipg opportunities consistent with the City's O>>neral Plan policies in
respoinse to local market demands and. will providel ifor a visually pleasing
envirpnment through adoption of supplemental perf $rmance standards that
have been provided to ensure compatibility with the adj \cent neighborhoods.
, .i
, . ~ '
SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETB~K STANDARDS
17.22\228
!
~ i
: A.
Single Family Residential
to
L
:q
The residential component shall compl)! L~ith the development
standards set forth in th~ Table 17.22!r, ~8.A The maximum
residential density shall be 10 units per gr9ts acre.
'I,
.. ~... at
. " Table17.~228.A (\
Residential Development Standards1!
. , ' MiraLoma Planned Development Overla,,~iStrict
IResid;ntial Development Standards '" dL ,d ,PDO-ll,
ILOT AREA H
:,
IMinimum net lot area (s'Iuare feet) 11
IMaximum number of dwelling units per gross acre i!
ILOT DIMENSIONS
IMinimum average width
IMinin\um lot depth
IBUlLQING SETBACKS
IMinimum front yardl
IMinimumcomer,side yardl
IMinimum interior side yard
IMlnlnjum rear yard'
IMininJum building separation
IOTHER REQVIREMENTS
IMaxinilum height
IOpen ~pace re'luired
IPrlva~ open space/per unit
Notes:
1. Measured from back of curb.
2,400 sq.ft.
10
I
I
I'
I.;
40ft.
60ft.
I
I
I
I
I
Sft.
10ft.
S ft.
10 ft.
10ft.
I
I
I
25 ft.
20%
200 sq. ft.
"
2. Measured from rear of building to rear of private open space easement.
Page 2 ofS
.
I
I
I
I
i
B.
~ii
Architecture .1
, The architecture for the project site shall complt, with the requirements
contained in Section 17.06.070.C of the City'sllMunicipal Code. The
architectural styles for the project shall be an ~ectic mix of Monterey,
. Craftsman and Spanish Colonial. 'I;
i :;
: ; ij,1
The Monterey style is a revival of the Anglo-inflUenced Spanish Colonial
houses of northern California. n is a fusion ~f Spanish Eclectic and
Colonial Revival details. Some identifying featut~s are low pitched roofs
, with second story balconies that are usually cantit~vered and covered by a
: principle roof. 11
I
H
The Spanish Colonial revival style is a collectic ~ of Spanish-influenced
'sub-styles. Designers were inspired by a nUmbl'! of sources such as the
,adobe and colonial buildings of early Califor cia and even Moorish,
, medieval Spanish and Italian architecture. Som" identifying features are
the use' of arches, courtyards and large, distin ltive, sometimes arched
: feature windows on the front fa~ade. 'i
, . 1J
, _ ,~f
The Craftsman style began in the early 1900's iJ.W response to the Prairie
style being developed in the Midwest coast. $metimes referred to as
California Bungalow, Greene and Greene POP~uized the approach by
introducing elements such as predominantly gab ,! roofs, timber detailing,
increased roof overhangs, and porches (where po I ible). Materials such as
: stone, siding and stucco are used to create an ecl:,tic appearance.
The design of the structures shall include provi~lons to comply with the
: following: :f
':)
,;
1. Streetscape:
j;;
; The residential s~.....;"'cape shall be designed in ,11 manner so to create .a
i visually interesting street frontage. A variety of building designs and
model types shall be used to avoid a monotono\,!s appearance along the
, streetscape. Placement of the different models should be varied from
contiguous lots and lots directly across from ea!th other. Following are
: policies to help achieve an attractive and interestfilg streetscape:
ij
a. Minimize the extent to which a garagti y.v~..ldes from other
portions of the house by placing a second ~tory over the garage.
b. Vary garage door treatments with different design details or by
using a combination of single- and two-door garages.
c. Use substantially different fa<;ade designs throughout the
development which will include a variety of complementary but
Page 3 of5
i
'i
I,
contrasting colors, varied entry treatments! Ivaried building heights,
and variety of design details and building forms.
!
"
.,.'
. 2. Visual Appearance: 'i
H
,.
Houses shall be designed W,ith relief in bUildinE') facades. Extensive flat
and unbroken wall planes shall be avoided. Foll . g are policies to help
, achieve variations in wall planes and to provide' attractive elevation:
~ { ~
I (~
a. A variety of building colors and mate4s shall be provided to
provide contrast. ' ~il
b. The use of materials that have a texture or " epth. '
c. Windows and door opening shall be pro \ded in the arr&Ur.;ate
areas to divide facades into s,eparate visu3elements.
d. The use of architectural features such as ,orches, sloping portions
of the roof, and stepping back the uppe! levels shall be used to
provide offsets of the building planes. r
~
. 3. Mass and Scale: .1
, Box like design shall be avoided by using v' iations in the building
footprint. The use of a variety of shapes and fo including architectural
projections, such as roof overhangs or steppe facades which provide
, contrast with vertical walls, and chimneys shall e used were feasible to
. avoid box.like design. Excessive mass and bU~Of the roof area shall be
, broken up into smaller areas that reduce the ap arent scale of the house
, and provide visual interest. This shall be acco pUshed by varying the
, height portions of the roof, varying the orientation of the roof, and by
! using gables, or hip roofs. ,
!
C. ,Landscaping
Landscaping of the project shall confonn with the Section 17.06.060 of the City's
MUnicipal Code. Landscape plans shall be required as part of the Development Plan
for the project and shall include the following:
1. The landscape design of the project consists of combination of ornamental
plant materials and use of drought-tolerant plant ~terials whenever possible.
,
"
2. Streetscape landscape for the major streets, MI4 Loma Drive and Rancho
Vista Road shall-be planted with minimum 24"b* specimen size street trees
spaced at 20'.0" o.c. spacing (maximum) with combination of IS gallon,S
gallon and I gallon shrubs and ground cover. IntrOduction of IS gallon hedge
shrubs spaced to adequately provide fence type screening along the public
right-of-way line. Flowering ground cover to be provided to fill any voids in
the streetscape landscape.
Page 4 of5
Ii
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
, r
3. Project entry at "D" Street shall include pro;" lct entry wall to match
architectural style of the project as well as 48" bo specimen trees, minimum
size evergreen flowering variety and combination: 15 gallon, 5 gallon, and 1
gallon shrubs in a interesting design pattern to p1J?vide visual interest at the
entry. i:
11
. )!
4. Common Area slope shall be provided with lanr'!scape with an a"".u".;ate
trees, shrubs, and ground cover to provide erosion :ontrol purpose to meet the
requirements of City's Municipal Code. All slope banks greater than or equal
to 3:1 shall, at a minimum, be irrigated and landsGl!-ped with al''''Wl'.;ate plant
materials for erosion control and to ,soften their ap~farance' as follows:
1. One fifteen gallon or larger tree per each six ~Illlred square feet of slope
2. ~:; gallon or larger shrub for each one hundreh square feet of slope area;
3. A"".u".;ate ground cover, minimum spacing of 12" on center from flat
size container. ,
4. Slope banks in excess of eight feet in verticall eight with slopes greater or
equal to 2: I shall also prove one five-gallon >r larger tree per each one
thousand square feet of slope' area in addi(on to the requirements of
subsection of this section.' .
5. Common front yard landscape s4all be develoj,ed to provide community
'landscape theme and landscape ch8racter for the ,roject. All common front
yards will have autollllitic irrigation system main,;.ained by the Homeowners
Association. A"l'~ "".;ate ornamental and drou4ht tolerant plant materials
shall be used as follows: ;
1:
a) One - 24"box specimen street tree per unit Imd additional two trees at
street comers. "
b) Two -' fifteen gallon background trees unit~d additional two trees at
street comers. ~
c) Five gallon shrubs for building foundation planting and along the fence
Line.
d) One gallon shrubs as needed for accent color and mass planting.
e) Sodded tiJrf and ground covers as needed.
6. Recreational Center shall be active use facility to provide family oriented
center including the development of children,: tot lot with special play
equipment structure. Recreational pool with gen~us pool activity areas for
social functions. Lush landscape for this facilitY will have ample specimen
size trees and shrubs for summer shading and visual interest.
All Common Landscape areas shall be landscaped per the above standards and
Maintained by the Homeowners Association for the proposed project.
Page 5 of5
i
i
I
,I